SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.___)
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee required.
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
| 1. | | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
| 2. | | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
| 3. | | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
| 4. | | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
o | | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o | | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
| 6. | | Amount Previously Paid:
|
| 7. | | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
IDM Pharma, Inc.
9 Parker, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held On June 25, 2008
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders ofIDM Pharma, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“IDM Pharma”). The meeting will be held on Thursday, June 25, 2008 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time at our offices at 9 Parker, Suite 100, Irvine, California 92618 for the following purposes:
| | |
| 1. | To elect six directors to serve for the ensuing year and until their successors are elected. |
|
| 2. | To approve an amendment to the IDM Pharma, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan to increase the number of shares of IDM Pharma’s common stock available for issuance under such plan from 2,828,571 to 3,228,571 shares. |
|
| 3. | To ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, as the independent auditors of IDM Pharma for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. |
|
| 4. | To conduct any other business properly brought before the meeting. |
These items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice.
The record date for the Annual Meeting is April 26, 2008. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date may vote at the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Timothy P. Walbert
President and Chief Executive Officer
Irvine, California
May 1, 2008
You are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, please complete, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy, or vote over the telephone or the Internet as instructed in these materials, as promptly as possible in order to ensure your representation at the meeting. A return envelope (which is postage prepaid if mailed in the United States) is enclosed for your convenience. Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still vote in person if you attend the meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
IDM PHARMA, INC.
9 Parker, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
FOR THE 2008 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
June 25, 2008
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THIS PROXY MATERIAL AND VOTING
Why am I receiving these materials?
We have sent you this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card because the Board of Directors of IDM Pharma, Inc. (sometimes referred to as the “Company” or “IDM Pharma”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders. You are invited to attend the annual meeting to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement. However, you do not need to attend the meeting to vote your shares. Instead, you may simply complete, sign and return the enclosed proxy card, or follow the instructions below to submit your proxy over the telephone or on the Internet.
The Company intends to mail this proxy statement and accompanying proxy card on or about May 1, 2008 to all stockholders of record entitled to vote at the annual meeting.
Who can vote at the annual meeting?
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 26, 2008 will be entitled to vote at the annual meeting. On this record date, there were 25,170,789 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.
Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name
If, on April 26, 2008, your shares were registered directly in your name withIDM Pharma’s transfer agent, American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, then you are a stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to fill out and return the enclosed proxy card or vote by proxy over the telephone or on the Internet as instructed below to ensure your vote is counted.
Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Bank
If on April 26, 2008your shares were held, not in your name, but rather in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered to be the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the annual meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or other agent regarding how to vote the shares in your account. You are also invited to attend the annual meeting. However, because you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from your broker or other agent.
What am I voting on?
There are three matters scheduled for a vote:
| | |
| • | Election of six directors to serve for the ensuing year and until their successors are elected; |
|
| • | Approval of an amendment to our 2000 Stock Plan to increase the number of shares of our common stock available for issuance under such plan from 2,828,571 to 3,228,571 shares; and |
|
| • | Ratification of the selection by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. |
1
How do I vote?
You may either vote “For” all the nominees to the Board of Directors or you may “Withhold” your vote for any nominee you specify. For each of the other matters to be voted on, you may vote “For” or “Against” or abstain from voting.
Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name
If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the annual meeting,vote by proxy using the enclosed proxy card, vote by proxy over the telephone, or vote by proxy on the Internet. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the meeting and vote in person even if you have already voted by proxy.
| | |
| • | To vote in person, come to the annual meeting and we will give you a ballot when you arrive. |
|
| • | To vote using the proxy card, simply complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If you return your signed proxy card to us before the annual meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct. |
|
| • | To vote over the telephone, which is available only for stockholders in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico, dial the toll-free 800 number printed on your proxy card using a touch-tone phone. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and follow the recorded instructions. Your vote must be received by 11:59 P.M., Eastern Daylight Time on June 24, 2008 to be counted. |
|
| • | To vote on the Internet, go towww.voteproxy.com to complete an electronic proxy card. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the enclosed proxy card. Your vote must be received by 11:59 P.M., Eastern Daylight Time on June 24, 2008 to be counted. Have the proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to create an electronic voting instruction form. |
Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank
If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank, or other agent, you should have received a proxy card and voting instructions with these proxy materials from that organization rather than from IDM Pharma. Simply complete and mail the proxy card to ensure that your vote is counted. Alternatively, you may vote by telephone or over the Internet as instructed by your broker or bank. To vote in person at the annual meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank, or other agent. Follow the instructions from your broker or bank included with these proxy materials, or contact your broker or bank to request a proxy form.
We provide Internet proxy voting to allow you to vote your shares on-line, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions. However, please be aware that you must bear any costs associated with your Internet access, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies.
How many votes do I have?
On each matter to be voted upon, you have one vote for each share of the Company’s common stock you own as of April 26, 2008.
What if I return a proxy card but do not make specific choices?
If you return a signed and dated proxy card without marking any voting selections, your shares will be voted “For” the election of all six nominees for director, “For” the approval of an amendment to our 2000 Stock Plan to increase the number of shares of our common stock available for issuance under such plan from 2,828,571 to 3,228,571 shares and “For” the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. If any other matter is properly presented at the meeting, your proxyholder (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares using his or her best judgment.
2
Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?
We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to these mailed proxy materials, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone, or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may also reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.
What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?
If you receive more than one proxy card, your shares are registered in more than one name or are registered in different accounts. Please complete, sign and return each proxy card to ensure that all of your shares are voted.
Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?
Yes.You can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the meeting.If you are the record holder of your shares, you may revoke your proxy in any one of three ways:
| | |
| • | You may submit another properly completed proxy card with a later date. |
|
| • | You may send a timely written notice that you are revoking your proxy to our Secretary at IDM Pharma, Inc., 9 Parker, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92618. |
|
| • | You may attend the annual meeting and vote in person.Simply attending the meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy. |
If your shares are held by your broker or bank as a nominee or agent, you should follow the instructions provided by your broker or bank.
When are stockholder proposals due for next year’s annual meeting?
To be considered for inclusion in next year’s proxy materials, your proposal must be submitted in writing by January 2, 2009, to our Secretary at IDM Pharma, Inc., 9 Parker, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92618. If you wish to bring a matter before the stockholders at next year’s annual meeting and you do not notify IDM Pharma before March 17, 2009, our management will have discretionary authority to vote all shares for which it has proxies in opposition to the matter.
How are votes counted?
Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the meeting, who will separately count “For” and (with respect to proposals other than the election of directors) “Against” votes, abstentions and broker non-votes. Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total for each proposal and will have the same effect as “Against” votes. Broker non-votes have no effect and will not be counted towards the vote total for any proposal.
What are “broker non-votes”?
Broker non-votes occur when a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” does not give instructions to the broker or nominee holding the shares as to how to vote on matters deemed “non-routine.” Generally, if shares are held in street name, the beneficial owner of the shares is entitled to give voting instructions to the broker or nominee holding the shares. If the beneficial owner does not provide voting instructions, the broker or nominee can still vote the shares with respect to matters that are considered to be “routine,” but not with respect to “non-routine” matters. Under the rules and interpretations of the New York Stock Exchange, “non-routine” matters are generally those involving a contest or a matter that may substantially affect the rights or privileges of shareholders, such as mergers or shareholder proposals.
How many votes are needed to approve each proposal?
| | |
| • | For the election of directors, the six nominees receiving the most “For” votes (among votes properly cast in person or by proxy) will be elected. Broker non-votes will have no effect. |
3
| | |
| • | To be approved, Proposal No. 2, approval of an amendment to our 2000 Stock Plan to increase the number of shares of our common stock available for issuance under such plan from 2,828,571 to 3,228,571 shares, must receive a “For” vote from the majority of shares present and entitled to vote either in person or by proxy. If you “Abstain” from voting, it will have the same effect as an “Against” vote. Broker non-votes will have no effect. |
|
| • | To be approved, Proposal No. 3, ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008, must receive a “For” vote from the majority of shares present and entitled to vote either in person or by proxy. If you “Abstain” from voting, it will have the same effect as an “Against” vote. Broker non-votes will have no effect. |
What is the quorum requirement?
A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present if at least a majority of the outstanding shares are represented by votes at the meeting or by proxy. On the record date, there were 25,170,789 common shares outstanding and entitled to vote. Thus 12,585,395 shares must be represented by votes at the meeting or by proxy to have a quorum.
Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy (or one is submitted on your behalf by your broker, bank or other nominee), or if you vote in person at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, the chairman of the meeting or a majority of the votes present at the meeting may adjourn the meeting to another date.
How can I find out the results of the voting at the annual meeting?
Preliminary voting results will be announced at the annual meeting. Final voting results will be published in the Company’s quarterly report onForm 10-Q for the second quarter of 2008.
4
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our certificate of incorporation permits the Board to fix the number of members comprising the Board of Directors. Currently, the number of members is fixed at eight and the Board has approved a reduction in the number of members of the Board to six effective as of the date of the 2008 Annual Meeting. There are six nominees for director this year. Votes may not be made for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named herein. Each director to be elected will hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is elected, or until the director’s death, resignation or removal. Each nominee listed below is currently a director of IDM Pharma and, except for Mr. Walbert and Mr. Tibbitts, was previously elected by the stockholders. Mr. Tibbitts was suggested for consideration for election to the Company’s Board by Robert J. De Vaere, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and was interviewed by Mr. Walbert and the members of the Audit and Nominating Committee of the Board and recommended for election to the Board.
It is our policy to encourage nominees for director to attend the Annual Meeting. Six of the seven nominees for election as a director at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders attended the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes properly cast in person or by proxy. The six nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes will be elected.Shares represented by executed proxies will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of the sixnominees named below. If any nominee becomes unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, your shares will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee proposed by IDM Pharma’s management. Each person nominated for election has agreed to serve if elected. Our management has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve.
Nominees
The following is a brief biography of each nominee for director.
| | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Occupation/
|
Name | | Age | | Position Held With the Company |
|
Timothy P. Walbert | | | 41 | | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Robert Beck, M.D. | | | 54 | | | Director |
Michael G. Grey | | | 55 | | | Director |
John P. McKearn, Ph.D. | | | 54 | | | Director |
Edward E. Penhoet, Ph.D. | | | 67 | | | Director |
Gregory J. Tibbitts | | | 41 | | | Director |
Mr. Walberthas served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since May 25, 2007, and as a member of the Board since July 18, 2007. Prior to joining IDM Pharma, Mr. Walbert was with NeoPharm, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from January 2006 until May 2007 where he was Executive Vice President Commercial Operations. Prior to NeoPharm, Inc., Mr. Walbert was at Abbott, a pharmaceutical company, from June 2001 to August 2005 where he served as Divisional Vice President and General Manager of Abbott Immunology and Divisional Vice President of Global Cardiovascular Marketing. Mr. Walbert was responsible for Abbott’s Immunology franchise and under his leadership, Abbott Immunology successfully obtained approval, launched and commercialized HUMIRA® for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and built a successful life cycle management plan in the United States, Europe and other countries. From April 1998 to June 2001, Mr. Walbert served as Director, Celebrex North America, Arthritis Team Leader, Asia Pacific, Latin America and Canada and Team Leader, Associate Director and Senior Product Manager and Product Manager, Arthrotec/Cytotec at G.D. Searle and, after its acquisition, Pharmacia Corporation, each a pharmaceutical company. From August 1997 to April 1998, Mr. Walbert was manager, market integration at Merck & Co., Inc, a pharmaceutical company. From February 1995 to August 1997, Mr. Walbert was in product management and sales roles at G.D. Searle and Co. Mr. Walbert also was a Territory Manager with Wyeth, a pharmaceutical company, from September 1991 to February 1995. Mr. Walbert earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in business from Muhlenberg College in Allentown, Pennsylvania.
5
Dr. Beckhas served as our director since August 2005. He has been the Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the Fox Chase Cancer Center since September 2001 and Deputy Director of the Population Science Department since January 2006, and served as a senior faculty member since July 2003. From October 1992 to August 2001 he served as a director for the Houston Academy of Medicine — Texas Medical Center Library, where he was the Chair from July 1998 to August 1999 and Interim Executive Director from August 1999 to August 2001. From August 1992 to September 2001, Dr. Beck served as a Professor of Pathology with the Baylor College of Medicine, where he also served as a Professor of Family and Community Medicine from July 1997 to September 2001, Vice President for Information Research and Planning from July 2000 to September 2001 and Vice President for Information Technology from August 1992 to June 2000. Since July 1999, Dr. Beck has served as an Adjunct Professor of Health Informatics with the University of Texas — Houston Health Science Center. Since March 2000, Dr. Beck has served as a director for RosettaMed, astart-up company based in Houston developing automated patient data entry forms and devices. From July 1997 to June 2000, Dr. Beck served as a director for VidiMedix Corporation, astart-up telemedicine company that was acquired bye-MedSoft.com in June 2000. In 1974, Dr. Beck received a Bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Dartmouth College. In 1978, Dr. Beck received a Medical degree from Johns Hopkins University.
Mr. Greyhas served as our director since July 1999 and since December 2007, as our Non-Executive Chairman of the Board. Since January 1, 2005, he has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of SGX Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biotechnology company, where he previously served as President from June 2003 to January 1, 2005 and as Chief Business Officer from April 1, 2001 until June 2003. In addition, Mr. Grey has been a member of the Board of Directors of SGX Pharmaceuticals since September 2001. Between January 1999 and September 2001, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Trega Biosciences, Inc., a biotechnology company. Prior to joining Trega, Mr. Grey served as President of BioChem Therapeutics, Inc., a division of BioChem Pharma, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, from November 1994 to August 1998. During 1994, Mr. Grey served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Ansan, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company. From 1974 to 1993, Mr. Grey served in various roles with Glaxo, Inc. and Glaxo Holdings, plc, a pharmaceutical company, culminating in his position as Vice President, Corporate Development. Mr. Grey serves on the Board of Directors of Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and BioMarin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Mr. Grey received a B.Sc. degree in chemistry from the University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Dr. McKearnhas served as our director since April 2000. Dr. McKearn has served as a consultant for Pennyhead, LLC, a biotechnology consulting firm, since September 2007. From January 2007 to August 2007, Dr. McKearn served as an advisor to Kalypsys, Inc., a privately held biotechnology company, where he served as Chief Executive Officer from March 2005 to December 2006. He also served as President and Chief Scientific Officer at Kalypsys from August 2004 to March 2005 and Chief Scientific Officer from July 2003 to August 2004. In addition, Dr. McKearn was a member of the Board of Directors of Kalypsys from July 2003 to December 2006. Prior to that, he was with Pharmacia Corporation, formerly G.D. Searle and Co., a pharmaceutical company, from 1987 to 2003. From August 2000 until June 2003, he served as Senior Vice President, Pharmacia Discovery Research, responsible for worldwide research activities. Prior to that he served as Vice President, Searle Discovery Research from 1999 to 2000, Executive Director of Oncology from 1995 to 1999, and directed all arthritis, inflammation and oncology research from 1987 to 1995. Dr. McKearn was a Senior Scientist at E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, a pharmaceutical company, from 1985 to 1987 and a member of the Basel Institute for Immunology from 1982 to 1985. Dr. McKearn received a Bachelor’s degree in biology from Northern Illinois University and a Ph.D. in Immunology from the University of Chicago.
Dr. Penhoethas served as our director since April 2007. Dr. Penhoet has served as a director of Alta Partners, a venture capital partnership investing in information technologies and life science companies, since August 2000. From July 1998 until July 2002, Dr. Penhoet served as the Dean of the School of Public Health and as a professor of Public Health and of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Penhoet was a co-founder of Chiron Corporation, a biotechnology company, where he served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director from its formation in 1981 until April 1998. From 1971 until 1981, Dr. Penhoet was a faculty member of the Biochemistry Department of the University of California, Berkeley. From September 2004 to February 2008, Dr. Penhoet served as President of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. From July 2002 to September 2004, he served as its Chief Program Officer, Science and Higher Education. Since December 2004, Dr. Penhoet has served
6
as the Vice Chairman of the Independent Citizens Oversight Committee of the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine. Dr. Penhoet currently serves as a director of Renovis, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, Zymogenetics, Inc., a biotechnology company, and several privately held companies. Dr. Penhoet received an A.B. in biology from Stanford University and a Ph.D. in biochemistry from the University of Washington. From 1968 until 1970, Dr. Penhoet was a post-doctoral fellow at the University of California, San Diego.
Gregory J. Tibbittshas served as our director since April 2008. Since July 2004 he has served as Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Cryocor, Inc., a medical technology company. From April 2000 to June 2004, he held various positions including Chief Financial Officer with Elitra Pharmaceuticals Inc., a biotechnology company. From December 1996 to March 2000, Mr. Tibbitts was a senior manager in the audit department of Ernst & Young LLP, an accounting firm, specializing in the biotechnology, medical device and other high technology industries. He also worked with Ernst & Young LLP from September 1989 to April 1993 before joining the mortgage banking division of ITT Financial, a financial services company, as Controller. Mr. Tibbitts received a B.A. degree in business administration from the University of San Diego and a Master of Business Administration degree in finance from San Diego State University. He is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of California.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE IN FAVOR OF EACH NAMED NOMINEE.
7
Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2008 Annual Meeting
The following is a brief biography of each of our directors continuing in office until the 2008 Annual Meeting. Drs. Grégoire and Deleage have elected not to stand for re-election at the 2008 Annual Meeting due to other business obligations.
Dr. Grégoirehas served as our director since August 2005 and was Executive Chair of the Board from August 2006 until December 2007. Dr. Grégoire has served as the President of the Human Genetic Therapies business of Shire plc, a specialty biopharmaceutical company, since September 2007. She was Chief Executive Officer of GlycoFi, Inc., a biotechnology company, from October 2004 until August 2005. Dr. Grégoire served as a consultant to the biopharmaceutical industry from December 2003 to September 2004. Prior to that, Dr. Grégoire was with Biogen (now Biogen Idec), a pharmaceutical company, from 1995 through 2003, where she led the European development and approval of AVONEX and served as Vice President, Regulatory Affairs from January 1999 to October 2000. She subsequently served as Biogen’s Vice President of Manufacturing from October 2000 to August 2001 and as Executive Vice President of Technical Operations from August 2001 to December 2003. Dr. Grégoire is an independent director of Cubist Pharmaceuticals, a public company with a commercial product in infectious disease. Dr. Grégoire received a college degree in sciences from the Seminaire de Sherbrooke, a pharmacy graduate degree from the Universite Laval and a Pharm.D from the State University of New York at Buffalo.
Dr. Deleagehas served as our director since August 2005. He has been the managing director of Alta Partners, a venture capital partnership investing in information technologies and life science companies, since founding the company in February 1996. From 1979 to 1996, Dr. Deleage served as a managing partner of Burr, Egan, Deleage & Co., a venture capital firm of which he was a founder. In 1971, Dr. Deleage founded Sofinnova, a venture capital firm in France, and in 1976 he founded Sofinnova, Inc., the U.S. subsidiary of Sofinnova. Dr. Deleage currently serves as a director of Kosan Biosciences Incorporated, a biotechnology company, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceuticals company, TorreyPines Therapeutics, Inc., a biotechnology company, Xcyte Therapies, Inc., a biotechnology company, and several privately held companies. Dr. Deleage received a baccalaureate degree in France, a master’s degree in electrical engineering from the Ecole Superieure d’Electricite, and a Ph.D. in economics from the Sorbonne.
INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Independence of the Board of Directors
As required under the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) listing standards, a majority of the members of a listed company’s Board of Directors must qualify as “independent,” as affirmatively determined by the Board of Directors. The Board consults with the Company’s counsel to ensure that the Board’s determinations are consistent with relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of “independent,” including those set forth in pertinent listing standards ofNasdaq, as in effect time to time.
Consistent with these considerations, after review of all relevant transactions or relationships between each director, or any of their family members, and us, our senior management and our independent auditors, the Board affirmatively has determined that all of our directors are independent directors, as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Nasdaq listing standards, except for Mr. Walbert, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Dr. McKearn, who had a consulting agreement with the Company from May 2007 through July 2007 to assist us with management and operational matters on an interim basis, and who, as a result of the compensation paid to him under the agreement, is no longer considered an independent director. Dr. McKearn resigned from each of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee when he entered into the consulting arrangement with us, and the Board appointed Dr. Beck, who meets the requirements to be a member of the Audit Committee under applicable rules to replace Dr. McKearn on the Audit Committee, and Mr. Grey, who meets the requirements to be a member of the Compensation Committee under applicable rules to replace Dr. McKearn on the Compensation Committee.
8
Meetings of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors met fourteen times during the last fiscal year. All directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they served, held during the period for which they were directors or committee members, respectively.
In fiscal 2007, the Company’s independent directors met on a number of occasions in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors were present, in accordance with applicable Nasdaq listing standards.
Information Regarding Committees of the Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors currently has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating Committee. Below is a description of each committee of the Board of Directors and information regarding committee meetings held in 2007. The Board of Directors has determined that each member of each committee meets the applicable rules and regulations regarding independence and that each member is free of any relationship that would interfere with his or her individual exercise of independent judgment with regard to us. The charters for the Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees can be found on our corporate website atwww.idm-pharma.com.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee of the Board oversees our corporate accounting and financial reporting process. The Board of Directors has adopted an Audit Committee Charter, which among other responsibilities, requires that this committee monitor our financial reporting process and internal control systems, review audit and management reports and review and approve the engagement of the independent auditors. The Audit Committee is currently comprised of four Board members, Drs. Deleage and Beck, and Messrs. Grey and Tibbitts. Dr. Deleage currently chairs the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met a total of six times in 2007. Prior to April 27, 2007, the Audit Committee met a total of two times and was comprised of Drs. Deleage and McKearn and Mr. Grey. Dr. McKearn worked as a consultant for the Company from May 2007 through July 2007 and was replaced on the Audit Committee by Dr. Beck on April 27, 2007, as he was no longer considered independent under the applicable Nasdaq listing standards. The Audit Committee met a total of four times after April 27, 2007. Mr. Tibbitts was appointed to the Audit Committee on April 3, 2008 and will become Chairman of the Audit Committee effective as of the 2008 Annual Meeting. The Audit Committee selects the independent auditors and provides a direct line of communication between the auditors and the Board. The independent auditors separately meet with the Audit Committee, with and without our management present, to review and discuss various matters, including our financial statements, the report of the independent auditors on the results, scope and terms of their work and their recommendations concerning our financial practices and procedures.
The Board annually reviews the Nasdaq listing standards definition of independence for Audit Committee members and has determined that all members of our Audit Committee are independent, as independence is currently defined in Rule 4350(d)(2)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Nasdaq listing standards. The Board has determined that each of Dr. Deleage and Mr. Tibbitts qualifies as an audit committee financial expert, as defined in applicable Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, rules. The Board made a qualitative assessment of Dr. Deleage’s and Mr. Tibbitts’ level of knowledge and experience based on a number of factors, including in the case of Dr. Deleage, his formal education and experience as a managing partner for venture capital firms and his prior experience as a member of numerous other public and private boards and audit committees, and in the case of Mr. Tibbitts, his formal education, his experience as a Chief Financial Officer in both public and private companies, and his status as a Certified Public Accountant.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors reviews and approves our overall compensation strategy and policies. The Compensation Committee administers our stock option plans, employee stock purchase plan and 401(k) plan, approves (or recommends to the Board for approval) salaries, bonuses and other compensation arrangements for our officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, and performs such other functions regarding compensation as our Board of Directors may delegate. All members of the Compensation Committee are independent, as independence is currently defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Nasdaq listing standards. The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of three Board members, Mr. Grey, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee, and Drs. Beck and Penhoet. The Compensation Committee held a total of six meeting in 2007. Prior to April 27, 2007, the Compensation Committee met a total of four times and was
9
comprised of Dr. McKearn, the Chairman of the Committee, and Drs. Beck and Drakeman. Dr. McKearn worked as a consultant for the Company from May 2007 through July 2007 and was replaced on the Compensation Committee by Mr. Grey on April 27, 2007, as he was no longer considered independent under the applicable Nasdaq listing standards. Dr. Penhoet was appointed to the Compensation Committee when he joined the Board in April 2007. The Compensation Committee met twice after April 27, 2007.
Commencing in 2007, the Compensation Committee also began to review with management the Company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis and to consider whether to recommend that it be included inproxy statements and other filings.
Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee, comprised of Drs. Deleage and Beck during 2007, met one time during 2007. Mr. Tibbitts was appointed to the Nominating Committee on April 3, 2008. The Nominating Committee is responsible for interviewing, evaluating, nominating and recommending individuals for membership on our Board and committees thereof and nominating specific individuals to be elected as our officers by the Board. Dr. Deleage currently chairs the Nominating Committee. All members of the Nominating Committee are independent, as independence is currently defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Nasdaq listing standards.
The Nominating Committee believes that candidates for director should have certain minimum qualifications, including the ability to read and understand basic financial statements, being over 21 years of age and having the highest personal integrity and ethics. The Nominating Committee also considers such factors as relevant experience for offering advice and guidance to management, sufficient time to devote to the affairs of IDM Pharma, demonstrated excellence in his or her field, the ability to exercise sound business judgment and the commitment to rigorously represent the long-term interests of our stockholders. However, the Nominating Committee retains the right to modify these qualifications from time to time.
The Nominating Committee uses its network of contacts to compile a list of potential director candidates, but may also engage, if it deems appropriate, a professional search firm. The Company has not used a professional search firm to identify potential director candidates in 2007 and to date in 2008. The Nominating Committee conducts any appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates after considering the function and needs of the Board. Candidates for director nominees are reviewed in the context of the current composition of the Board, our operating requirements and the long-term interests of our stockholders. In conducting this assessment, the Nominating Committee considers experience, skills, age, diversity and such other factors as it deems appropriate given the current needs of the Board and the Company, to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and capability. The Nominating Committee also determines whether the nominee is independent for Nasdaq purposes, which determination is based upon applicable Nasdaq listing standards, applicable SEC rules and regulations and the advice of counsel, if necessary. The Nominating Committee meets to discuss and consider the candidates’ qualifications and then selects a nominee for recommendation to the Board of Directors by majority vote. In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the Nominating Committee reviews these directors’ overall service to us during their terms, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance and any other relationships and transactions that might impair the directors’ independence.
The Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. The Nominating Committee does not intend to alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates based on whether or not the candidate was recommended by a stockholder. Stockholders who wish to recommend individuals for consideration by the Nominating Committee to become nominees for election to the Board may do so by delivering a written notice to our Secretary at IDM Pharma, Inc., 9 Parker, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92618 at least 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the mailing of the Company’s proxy statement for the last Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Submissions must include the full name of the proposed nominee, a description of the proposed nominee’s business experience for at least the previous five years, complete biographical information, a description of the proposed nominee’s qualifications as a director and a representation that the nominating stockholder is a beneficial or record holder of the Company’s stock and has been a holder for at least one year. Any such submission must be accompanied by the written consent of the proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected.
10
Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors1
Management is responsible for IDM Pharma’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, as the independent auditors of the Company is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States and to issue a report thereon. The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring and overseeing these processes, as well as selection of the Company’s independent accountants.
In this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and the independent accountants. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 with management and the independent accountants. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent accountants matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol.1 AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB, in Rule 3200T.
The Company’s independent accountants also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), as adopted by the PCAOB in Rule 3600T, and the Audit Committee discussed with the independent accountants that firm’s independence.
Based on the Audit Committee’s discussion with management and the independent accountants as well as the Audit Committee’s review of the representation of management and the report of the independent accountants to the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board include the audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC.
From the members of the Audit Committee of IDM Pharma, Inc.:
Jean Deleage, Ph.D.
Robert Beck, Ph.D.
Michael G. Grey
Gregory J. Tibbitts
Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on Executive Compensation1
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”) contained in this proxy statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement and incorporated into our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
From the members of the Compensation Committee of IDM Pharma, Inc.:
Michael G. Grey
Robert Beck, Ph.D.
Edward E. Penhoet, Ph.D.
1 The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference in any such filing.
11
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
As indicated above, the Compensation Committee consists of Mr. Grey and Drs. Beck and Penhoet. No member of the Compensation Committee has ever been our officer or employee. None of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last completed fiscal year, on the compensation committee or board of directors of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.
Stockholder Communications With The Board Of Directors
Historically, the Company has not provided a formal process related to stockholder communications with the Board. Nevertheless, every effort has been made to ensure that the views of stockholders are heard by the Board or individual directors, as applicable, and that appropriate responses are provided to stockholders in a timely manner. We believe our responsiveness to stockholder communications to the Board has been excellent. Nevertheless, during the upcoming year the Nominating Committee will give full consideration to the adoption of a formal process for stockholder communications with the Board and, if adopted, publish it promptly and post it to the Company’s website.
Code Of Business Conduct and Ethics
On December 9, 2003, we adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all of our officers, directors and employees. If we make any substantive amendments to the Code of Business Conduct or grant any waiver from a provision of the code to any executive officer or director, we will promptly disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver on our website atwww.idm-pharma.com.
12
PROPOSAL 2
APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE IDM PHARMA, INC. 2000 STOCK PLAN
In April 2000, the Board adopted, and our stockholders subsequently approved, our 2000 Stock Plan (the “2000 Plan”), which initially included a reserve of 700,000 shares of common stock for issuance under such plan. As a result of a series of amendments and taking into account a one-for-seven reverse stock split of our outstanding shares of common stock, effected on August 15, 2005, there were 2,828,571 shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the 2000 Plan as of April 26, 2008 (excluding the Additional Pool, as defined below). All references to share numbers below are post-reverse split.
In April 2008, the Board approved , subject to stockholder approval, a 400,000 share increase in the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2000 Plan. The increase is referred to as the “Additional Pool.” The amendment adding the Additional Pool is referred to as the “Amendment.” As of April 26, 2008, 2,521,799 shares of common stock related to stock options and deferred issuance restricted stock awards were outstanding under the 2000 Stock Plan, 212,768 shares had been issued pursuant to option exercises and direct stock issuances, and excluding the Additional Pool, 94,004 shares (plus any shares that might in the future be returned to the plan as a result of cancellation or expiration of options) remained available for future grant under the 2000 Plan.
The Board believes the Amendment is necessary to ensure that the number of shares remaining available for issuance under the 2000 Plan is sufficient, in light of our current capitalization, to allow us to continue to attract and retain the services of key individuals essential to our long-term growth and financial success. We rely significantly on equity incentives in the form of stock awards to attract and retain key employees, and we believe that such equity incentives are necessary for us to remain competitive in the marketplace for executive talent and other key employees. We grant options or other stock awards to newly hired or continuing employees based on both competitive market conditions and individual performance.
Stockholders are requested in this Proposal 2 to approve the Amendment to the 2000 Plan. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting will be required to approve the Amendment to the 2000 Plan as described in this Proposal 2. Abstentions will be counted toward the tabulation of votes cast on proposals presented to the stockholders and will have the same effect as negative votes. Broker non-votes are counted towards a quorum, but are not counted for any purpose in determining whether this matter has been approved.
MANAGEMENT AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RECOMMEND A VOTE IN FAVOR OF PROPOSAL 2.
The essential features of the 2000 Plan are outlined below:
General
The 2000 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options to employees and the grant of nonstatutory stock options, rights to purchase restricted stock and stock bonuses to consultants, employees (including officers) and directors. Incentive stock options granted under the 2000 Plan are intended to qualify as “incentive stock options” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. See “Federal Income Tax Information” below for a discussion of the tax treatment of the various stock awards permitted under the 2000 Plan, referred to as Stock Awards.
Purpose
The 2000 Plan was adopted to (i) provide a means by which selected employees and directors of and consultants and advisors to us and our affiliates could be given an opportunity to benefit from increases in value of our common stock through the granting of Stock Awards, and (ii) assist in retaining the services of persons holding key positions, assist in securing and retaining the services of persons capable of filling such positions, and provide incentives for such persons to exert maximum efforts for our success. All of the approximately 23 employees, directors and consultants of IDM Pharma and its affiliates are eligible to participate in the 2000 Plan.
13
Administration
The Board administers the 2000 Plan. The Board has the power to construe and interpret the 2000 Plan and, subject to the provisions of the 2000 Plan, to determine, among other things, the following: the persons to whom Stock Awards will be granted; when and how Stock Awards will be granted; the form of Stock Awards; the provisions of each Stock Award granted, including the time or times when a person will be permitted to receive stock pursuant to a Stock Award, the number of shares of common stock subject to each Stock Award, and the time(s) at which shares of common stock subject to each Stock Award shall vest,and/or become exercisable, if applicable, the exercise or purchase price, the type of consideration that may be used as payment for the Stock Awards, and the other terms of the Stock Awards.
The Board has the power to delegate administration of the 2000 Plan to a committee composed of one or more members of the Board. In the discretion of the Board, a committee may consist solely of two or more “non-employee directors” within the meaning ofRule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, or solely of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. For this purpose, a “non-employee director” generally is a director who does not receive remuneration from us other than compensation for service as a director (except for amounts not in excess of specified limits applicable pursuant toRule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act). An “outside director” generally is a director who is neither a current or former officer of IDM Pharma nor a current employee of IDM Pharma, does not receive any remuneration from us other than compensation for service as a director, and is not employed by or have certain ownership interests in an entity that receives remuneration from us (except within specified limits applicable under regulations issued pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code). If administration is delegated to a committee, the committee has the power to delegate administrative powers to a subcommittee. As used herein with respect to the 2000 Plan, the “Board” refers to any committee the Board appoints or, if applicable, any such subcommittee, as well as to the Board itself. In accordance with the foregoing provisions, the Board has delegated administration of the 2000 Plan to the Compensation Committee.
Eligibility
Incentive stock options may be granted under the 2000 Plan to employees (including officers) of us and our affiliates. Stock Awards other than incentive stock options may be granted under the 2000 Plan only to employees (including officers) and directors of, and advisors and consultants to, us or our affiliates. The 2000 Plan specifically provides that Stock Awards other than incentive stock options may be granted to our Non-Employee Directors. For this purpose, a “Non-Employee Director” is defined in the 2000 Plan as a director of IDM Pharma who is not otherwise an employee of us or our affiliate. Each of our current directors except Mr. Walbert and Dr.s McKearn and Grégoire are currently a Non-Employee Director.
No incentive stock option may be granted under the 2000 Plan to any person who, at the time of the grant, owns (or is deemed to own) stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of us or our affiliate, unless the option exercise price is at least 110% of the fair market value of the stock subject to the option on the date of grant, and the term of the option does not exceed five years from the date of grant. In addition, the aggregate fair market value, determined at the time of grant, of the shares of common stock with respect to which incentive stock options are exercisable for the first time by an optionholder during any calendar year (under all plans of us and our affiliates) may not exceed $100,000.
Under the 2000 Plan, no employee may be granted options and restricted stock purchase rights covering, in the aggregate, more than 500,000 shares of common stock during any calendar year.
Stock Subject to the 2000 Plan
Subject to stockholder approval of Proposal 2, an aggregate of 3,228,571 shares of common stock is reserved for issuance under the 2000 Plan. Stock subject to the 2000 Plan may be unissued shares or reacquired shares, bought on the market or otherwise. If any Stock Award granted under the 2000 Plan expires or otherwise terminates without being exercised in full, the shares of common stock not acquired pursuant to such Stock Award again become available for issuance under the 2000 Plan. As of April 26, 2008, the closing price of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market was $2.14 per share.
14
Terms of Options
The following is a description of the permissible terms of stock options under the 2000 Plan. Individual option grants may be more restrictive as to any or all of the permissible terms described below. In addition, the Board may at any time amend outstanding options. The 2000 Plan requires, however, that we obtain stockholder approval before repricing any stock options or engaging in any option cancellation or regrant program providing for the grant of Stock Awards at a lower price.
Exercise Price; Payment. The per share exercise price of an incentive stock option granted under the 2000 Plan may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of the option grant, and in some cases may not be less than 110% of such fair market value (see “Eligibility” above). The per share exercise price of nonstatutory options granted under the 2000 Plan may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of the option grant. Any change to this requirement regarding the exercise price of nonstatutory stock options requires stockholder approval.
The exercise price of options granted under the 2000 Plan must be paid either in cash at the time the option is exercised or, at the discretion of the Board, by delivery of other common stock, pursuant to a deferred payment arrangement, or in any other form of legal consideration acceptable to the Board.
Transferability. Under the 2000 Plan, an incentive stock option may not be transferred by the employee to whom the option was granted other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. During the lifetime of the employee, an incentive stock option may be exercised only by the employee. A nonstatutory stock option is transferable to the extent provided in a participant’s option grant agreement. If the nonstatutory stock option does not provide for transferability, then the nonstatutory stock option is not transferable other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a domestic relations order. An optionholder may designate a beneficiary who may exercise the option following the optionholder’s death.
Option Exercise. Options granted under the 2000 Plan may vest, or become exercisable in cumulative increments, as determined by the Board. Vesting typically will occur during the optionholder’s continued service with us or our affiliate, whether such service is performed in the capacity of employee, director or consultant (collectively, referred to as service) and regardless of any change in the capacity of such service. Options granted under the 2000 Plan may be subject to different vesting terms. The Board has the power to accelerate the time during which an option may vest or be exercised. In addition, options granted under the 2000 Plan may permit exercise prior to vesting, but in such event the optionholder may be required to enter into an early exercise stock purchase agreement that allows us to repurchase unvested shares, generally at their exercise price, should the optionholder’s service terminate before vesting. Shares subject to repurchase by us under an early exercise stock purchase agreement also may be subject to such restrictions on transfer that the Board deems appropriate.
To the extent provided by the terms of an option, an optionholder may satisfy any federal, state or local tax withholding obligation relating to the exercise of such option by a cash payment upon exercise, by authorizing us to withhold a portion of the stock otherwise issuable to the optionholder, by delivering already-owned stock of IDM Pharma or by a combination of these means.
Term. The maximum term of options under the 2000 Plan is ten years, except that in certain cases the maximum term is five years (see “Eligibility”). Unless a shorter term is established by the Board and specifically provided in the option grant agreement, nonstatutory options granted to Non-Employee Directors have a term of ten years. Options under the 2000 Plan generally terminate three months after the optionholder’s service terminates, unless (i) termination of service is due to the optionholder’s disability (as defined in the 2000 Plan), in which case the option may, but need not, provide that it may be exercised (to the extent the option was exercisable at the time of the termination of service) at any time within twelve months of such termination; (ii) the optionholder dies before termination of service, or within not more than three months after termination of service, in which case the option may, but need not, provide that it may be exercised (to the extent the option was exercisable at the time of the optionholder’s death) within eighteen months of the optionholder’s death by the person or persons to whom the rights to such option pass by will or by the laws of descent and distribution; or (iii) the option by its terms specifically provides otherwise. With respect to nonstatutory options granted to Non-Employee Directors, the 2000 Plan provides that such options may be exercised within (to the extent the option was exercisable at the time of the
15
termination of service) twelve months after the termination of the Non-Employee Director’s service to IDM Pharma, unless otherwise determined by the Board and provided in the option grant agreement. The option agreement may provide that the option term will automatically be extended in the event that exercise of the option within these periods is prohibited. In no event, however, may an option be exercised beyond the expiration of its term.
Additional Terms of French Qualified Options
On March 15, 2005, the Board approved an amendment of the 2000 Plan, referred to as the French annex, to provide for additional terms of stock options granted under the 2000 Plan to certain persons who are employees, managers or directors of IDM Pharma subsidiaries organized under the laws of France so that such stock options will qualify for the favorable tax and social security treatment applicable to stock options under French law. Options granted pursuant to the terms of the French annex are referred to as the French qualified options.
Share Limitation. The total number of shares of common stock underlying French qualified options granted pursuant to the French annex may not exceed one-third of our share capital, as defined under French law, on the date of grant. However, the foregoing limitation does not increase the total number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2000 Plan.
Eligibility. Provided that on the date of grant such persons are residents of France and do not hold more than 10% of our share capital (as defined under French law) the following individuals are eligible to receive French qualified options pursuant to the terms of the French annex: the Chairman (Président du Conseil d’administration), the CEO (directeur général ou directeur général délégué), members of the Directorate (Directoire), and managers (Gérant) of a French affiliate, and persons who are employed pursuant to an employment contract by a French affiliate. For eligibility purposes, a French affiliate means an IDM Pharma affiliate that is also an IDM Pharma subsidiary organized under the laws of France. For such purposes, an IDM Pharma subsidiary means, if the shares of IDM Pharma are not listed on a public stock exchange on the date of grant, a company 10% of the share capital or voting rights of which are held directly or indirectly by IDM Pharma, and, if the shares of IDM Pharma are listed on a public stock exchange on the date of grant, a company 10% of the share capital or voting rights of which are held directly or indirectly by IDM Pharma or a company holding directly or indirectly 10% of the share capital or voting rights of IDM Pharma or a company at least 50% of the share capital or voting rights of which are held directly or indirectly by a company holding itself directly or indirectly at least 50% of the capital or voting rights of IDM Pharma, in each case as determined under French law.
Additional Restrictions. The terms of French qualified options will contain additional restrictions that are intended for such options to qualify for the favorable tax and social security treatment applicable to stock options that comply with French law, the material terms of which are described below. Individual option grants may be more restrictive as to any or all of the permissible terms.
Amendments. The Board may at any time amend outstanding French qualified options to the extent permitted by French law, although certain amendments that would impair the rights of the optionholder to whom the option was granted will also require the optionholder’s consent.
Exercise Price. The per share exercise price of a French qualified option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of the option grant. Additionally, the per share exercise price of a French qualified option may not be less than (i) 80% of the average opening share price on the 20 trading days the date of grant, if the common stock is admitted to trading on a regulated stock market, and (ii) as determined by the Board according to objective methods used for the valuation of the shares, taking into account our net accounting situation, profitability and business prospects by means of an appropriate weighting in each case, if the common stock is not admitted to trading on a regulated stock market. These criteria will be assessed on a consolidated basis if necessary or, failing that, by taking into account the financial statements issued by any significant IDM Pharma subsidiaries. In the event these methods cannot be used, the share price will be determined by dividing the total amount of the revalued net assets, calculated according to the most recent balance sheet, by the number of existing shares. Notwithstanding the preceding, with respect to French qualified options to purchase existing shares (as opposed to newly issued shares), and in addition to the above limits, the per share exercise price
16
must be no less than 80% of the average share price of the shares repurchased by us in order to satisfy the exercise of French qualified options.
Transferability. French qualified options may not be transferred by the individual to whom the option was granted other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution and during his or her lifetime, may be exercised only by such individual.
Term. The maximum term of French qualified options is 10 years. In the event of the optionholders’ death, the French qualified option will expire upon the earlier of six months following the date of death or the expiration of the term of the French qualified option as set forth in the option agreement.
Lock-Up Period. Generally, any shares acquired upon exercise of a French qualified option may not be sold, assigned or donated until the fourth anniversary of the date of grant. However, suchlock-up period will not apply in the event of the death or disability of the optionholder. Additionally, suchlock-up period will not apply in the event of the retirement or dismissal of the optionholder, provided that the option was exercised at least three months prior to the date of retirement or dismissal. Thelock-up period also will not apply to any shares of common stock received upon exercise of qualified options, provided that the relevant options were exercised after the date of the termination of the optionholder’s continuous service in accordance with Article 6(h) of the 2000 plan.
Adjustment Provisions. Transactions not involving receipt of consideration by us, such as a merger, consolidation, reorganization, stock dividend, or stock split, may change the outstanding French qualified options as to the class, number of shares and price per share of common stock subject to such options to the extent allowed by French law. Additionally, the Board may make such other similar adjustments to French qualified options in order to comply with French law.
Effect of Certain Corporate Events. The 2000 Plan provisions relating to a “corporate transaction” and other significant corporate events (as described below) that would provide for the assumption, continuation, substitution, terminationand/or acceleration of vesting of outstanding options under the terms of the 2000 Plan will apply to the French qualified options unless otherwise determined by the Board, in its sole discretion.
Duration and Termination. The Board may suspend or terminate the French annex without stockholder approval or ratification at any time or from time to time. The French annex will terminate on May 15, 2008.
Terms of Stock Bonuses and Restricted Stock
The following is a description of the permissible terms of stock bonuses and purchases of restricted stock under the 2000 Plan. Stock bonus and restricted stock purchase awards may contain such additional terms and conditions as the Board shall deem appropriate, not inconsistent with the following terms and conditions. Individual stock bonuses or purchases of restricted stock may be more restrictive as to any or all of the permissible terms described below. In addition, the Board may at any time amend outstanding stock bonuses and restricted stock, although certain amendments that would impair the rights of the person to whom the award was granted require the award holder’s consent.
Purchase Price; Payment. The purchase price for restricted stock is determined by the Board, but in no event may it be less than 100% of the fair market value on the date of the grant or at the time the purchase is consummated. This requirement may be modified so that the purchase price for restricted stock may be not less than 85% of the fair market value on the date of grant or at the time the purchase is consummated if stockholder approval of this change is obtained. The Board may determine that eligible participants may be awarded stock pursuant to a stock bonus agreement in consideration for past services rendered to us.
The purchase price of stock acquired pursuant to a restricted stock purchase agreement must be paid either (i) in cash at the time of purchase; (ii) at the discretion of the Board, according to a deferred payment arrangement, or (iii) in any other form of legal consideration acceptable to the Board.
Repurchase Option. Shares of common stock sold or awarded under the 2000 Plan may, but need not, be subject to a repurchase option in favor of us in accordance with a vesting schedule to be determined by the Board. In the event a participant’s service terminates before the shares of common stock subject to such participant’s Stock Award have vested, we may repurchase or otherwise reacquire any or all of the unvested shares of common stock
17
held by that person on the date of termination, if such repurchase is provided for pursuant to the terms of the stock bonus or restricted stock purchase agreement.
Transferability. No rights under a stock bonus or restricted stock purchase agreement may be assigned by any participant under the 2000 Plan, except as expressly authorized by the terms of the applicable stock bonus or restricted stock purchase agreement.
Deferral. Stock bonus and restricted stock purchase awards may include a deferral feature whereby issuance of the shares subject to the award will occur on a date following the award’s vesting date, subject to such terms and conditions as the Board shall deem appropriate. Dividend equivalent rights may be credited with respect to the shares subject to such awards.
Adjustment Provisions
Transactions not involving receipt of consideration by us, such as a merger, consolidation, reorganization, stock dividend, or stock split, may change the class and number of shares of common stock subject to the 2000 Plan and outstanding Stock Awards. In that event, the 2000 Plan will be appropriately adjusted as to the class and the maximum number of shares of common stock subject to the 2000 Plan and the limitation, pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code, on the total number of shares subject to stock awards under the 2000 Plan that an employee is eligible to be granted during any calendar year, and outstanding Stock Awards will be adjusted as to the class, number of shares and price per share of common stock subject to such Stock Awards.
Effect of Certain Corporate Events
The following treatment shall apply in the case of certain corporate events, as described below, unless otherwise provided in a written agreement between us or an affiliate and a participant.
The 2000 Plan provides that, in the event of our dissolution or liquidation, then with respect to Stock Awards held by participants whose service with us or our affiliate has not terminated, the vesting and, if applicable, the time during which such Stock Awards may be exercised, shall be accelerated in full and such Stock Awards shall terminate if not exercised (if applicable) prior to such dissolution or liquidation, except to the extent that such Stock Awards are assumed or substituted by a surviving or acquiring corporation. The 2000 Plan further provides that, in the event of a sale, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets or certain specified types of mergers (as more fully described in the 2000 Plan) (such events individually referred to herein as a “corporate transaction”), any surviving corporation may either assume Stock Awards outstanding under the 2000 Plan or substitute similar awards for those outstanding under the 2000 Plan. If any surviving corporation does not either assume Stock Awards outstanding under the 2000 Plan, or substitute similar awards, then (i) with respect to outstanding Stock Awards held by participants whose service has not terminated, the vesting and, if applicable, the time during which such Stock Awards may be exercised, will be accelerated in full as of or prior to the occurrence of such corporate transaction and shall terminate if not exercised (if applicable) at or prior to such corporate transaction and (ii) any other outstanding awards shall terminate if not exercised (if applicable) prior to such corporate transaction. The acceleration of Stock Awards in the event of an acquisition or similar corporate event may be viewed as an anti-takeover provision, which may have the effect of discouraging a proposal to acquire or otherwise obtain control of us.
In addition, in the event there occurs a securities acquisition representing 50% or more of our combined voting power or a change in the Board composition representing 50% or more of the incumbent Board members, other than in a corporate transaction, then, with respect to participants whose service has not terminated, the vesting and, if applicable, exercisability of outstanding Stock Awards will be accelerated in full.
If there occurs any dissolution or liquidation of IDM Pharma, or any corporate transaction or other event described above occurs, the vesting and exercisability of nonstatutory options held by Non-Employee Directors whose service has not terminated shall be accelerated in full, unless otherwise specifically provided in the applicable option grant agreement.
18
Duration, Amendment and Termination
The Board may suspend or terminate the 2000 Plan without stockholder approval or ratification at any time or from time to time. Unless sooner terminated, the 2000 Plan will terminate on April 20, 2010.
The Board also may amend the 2000 Plan at any time or from time to time. However, no amendment will be effective unless approved by our stockholders to the extent that stockholder approval is necessary in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Code or any Nasdaq or other applicable securities exchange listing requirements. In addition, the provisions of the 2000 Plan regarding the exercise price of nonstatutory stock options, the pricing of restricted stock purchases and the limitations on option repricing and option cancellation and regrant programs may not be amended without stockholder approval. The Board may submit any other amendment of the 2000 Plan for stockholder approval, including, but not limited to, amendments intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code regarding the exclusion of performance-based compensation from the limitation on the deductibility of compensation paid to certain employees.
Federal Income Tax Information
The tax treatment afforded the specific types of Stock Awards granted under the 2000 Plan is briefly described below. With respect to the respective tax rates applicable to such Stock Awards, currently the maximum ordinary income rate and short-term capital gains rate is effectively 35%, while the long-term capital gains rate for federal income tax purposes is currently 15%. Slightly different rules may apply to optionholders who acquire stock subject to certain repurchase options or who are subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.
Incentive Stock Options. Incentive stock options under the 2000 Plan are intended to be eligible for the favorable federal income tax treatment accorded “incentive stock options” under Section 422 of the Code.
There generally are no federal income tax consequences to the optionholder or us by reason of the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option. However, the exercise of an incentive stock option may either cause the optionholder to incur liability for alternative minimum tax in the first instance or result in an increase in the amount of alternative minimum tax otherwise payable by the optionholder, if any.
If an optionholder holds stock acquired through exercise of an incentive stock option for more than two years from the date on which the option is granted and more than one year from the date on which the shares are transferred to the optionholder upon exercise of the option, any gain or loss on a disposition of such stock will be a long-term capital gain or loss.
Generally, if the optionholder disposes of the stock before the expiration of either of these holding periods, or a disqualifying disposition, then at the time of disposition the optionholder will realize taxable ordinary income equal to the lesser of (i) the excess of the stock’s fair market value on the date of exercise over the exercise price, or (ii) the optionholder’s actual gain, if any, on the purchase and sale. The optionholder’s additional gain or any loss upon the disqualifying disposition will be a capital gain or loss, which will be long-term or short-term depending on whether the stock was held for more than one year.
To the extent the optionholder recognizes ordinary income by reason of a disqualifying disposition, we will generally be entitled (subject to the requirement of reasonableness, the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Code and the satisfaction of a tax reporting obligation) to a corresponding business expense deduction in the tax year in which the disqualifying disposition occurs.
Nonstatutory Stock Options. Nonstatutory stock options granted under the 2000 Plan generally have the following federal income tax consequences:
There are no tax consequences to the optionholder or us by reason of the grant of a nonstatutory stock option. Upon acquisition of the stock, the optionholder normally will recognize taxable ordinary income equal to the excess, if any, of the stock’s fair market value on the date of acquisition over the purchase price. However, to the extent the stock is subject to certain types of vesting restrictions, the taxable event will be delayed until the vesting restrictions lapse unless the participant elects to be taxed on receipt of the stock. With respect to employees, we are generally required to withhold from regular wages or supplemental wage payments an amount based on the ordinary income recognized. Subject to the requirement of reasonableness,
19
the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Code and the satisfaction of a tax reporting obligation, we will generally be entitled to a business expense deduction equal to the taxable ordinary income realized by the optionholder.
Upon disposition of the stock, the optionholder will recognize a capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the selling price and the sum of the amount paid for such stock plus any amount recognized as ordinary income upon acquisition (or vesting) of the stock. Such gain or loss will be long-term or short-term depending on whether the stock was held for more than one year. Slightly different rules may apply to optionholders who acquire stock subject to certain repurchase options or who are subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.
Stock Bonuses and Restricted Stock. Stock bonuses and restricted stock purchases granted under the 2000 Plan have the following federal income tax consequences:
Generally, at the time of receipt of the stock, the recipient’s tax treatment depends on whether the shares are then subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (e.g., vesting) and, if so, whether he or she timely files an election under Section 83(b) of the Code. If the shares are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, and a Section 83(b) election is timely filed, the recipient will recognize ordinary income in the amount of the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares at the time of the purchase or other transfer over the purchase price. If the election is not timely filed, the recipient will recognize ordinary income at the time of receipt only in the amount of the difference between the purchase price and the fair market value of any shares that are not at the time subject to our repurchase option. Thereafter, whenever our repurchase option lapses with respect to a given number of shares, the recipient will recognize ordinary income in the amount of the excess of the fair market value of the shares with respect to which the repurchase option has just lapsed over the purchase price. With respect to employees, we are generally required to withhold from regular wages or supplemental wage payments an amount based on the ordinary income recognized. Subject to the requirement of reasonableness, the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Code and the satisfaction of a tax reporting obligation, we will generally be entitled to a business expense deduction equal to the taxable ordinary income realized by the participant.
However, no taxable income is recognized upon receipt of a stock bonus or stock purchase award that includes a deferral feature. The participant will recognize ordinary income in the year in which the shares subject to that award are actually issued to the participant in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of issuance. The participant and IDM Pharma will be required to satisfy certain tax withholding requirements applicable to such income. Subject to the requirement of reasonableness, Section 162(m) of the Code and the satisfaction of a tax reporting obligation, IDM Pharma will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant at the time the shares are issued. In general, the deduction will be allowed for the taxable year in which such ordinary income is recognized by the participant.
Upon disposition of the stock, the participant will recognize a capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the selling price and the sum of the amount paid for such stock plus any amount recognized as ordinary income upon acquisition (or vesting) of the stock. Such gain or loss will be long-term or short-term depending on whether the stock was held for more than one year. Slightly different rules may apply to participants who acquire stock subject to certain repurchase options or who are subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.
Potential Limitation on Company Deductions. Section 162(m) of the Code denies a deduction to any publicly held corporation for compensation paid to certain “covered employees” in a taxable year to the extent that compensation to such covered employee exceeds $1 million. It is possible that compensation attributable to Stock Awards, when combined with all other types of compensation received by a covered employee from us, may cause this limitation to be exceeded in any particular year.
Certain kinds of compensation, including qualified “performance-based compensation,” are disregarded for purposes of the deduction limitation. In accordance with Treasury regulations issued under Section 162(m), compensation attributable to stock options will qualify as performance-based compensation if the award is granted
20
by a compensation committee comprised solely of “outside directors” and either (i) the plan contains a per-employee limitation on the number of shares for which such awards may be granted during a specified period, the per-employee limitation is approved by the stockholders, and the exercise price of the award is no less than the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant, or (ii) the award is granted (or exercisable) only upon the achievement (as certified in writing by the compensation committee) of an objective performance goal established in writing by the compensation committee while the outcome is substantially uncertain, and the award is approved by stockholders.
Compensation attributable to restricted stock and stock bonus awards will qualify as performance-based compensation under the Treasury regulations only if (a) the award is granted by a compensation committee comprised solely of “outside directors,” (b) the award is granted (or exercisable) only upon the achievement of an objective performance goal established in writing by the compensation committee while the outcome is substantially uncertain, (c) the compensation committee certifies in writing prior to the granting (or exercisability) of the award that the performance goal has been satisfied and (d) prior to the granting (or exercisability) of the award, shareholders have approved the material terms of the award (including the class of employees eligible for such award, the business criteria on which the performance goal is based, and the maximum amount, or formula used to calculate the amount, payable upon attainment of the performance goal).
Compliance with Section 409A of the Code. IDM Pharma intends that any stock bonus or restricted stock purchase awards granted under the 2000 Plan that include a deferral feature shall contain such provisions so that such awards will comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. Generally, if at any time during a taxable year a nonqualified deferred compensation plan fails to meet the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, or is not operated in accordance with those requirements, all amounts deferred under the 2000 Plan for the taxable year and all preceding taxable years, by any participant with respect to whom the failure relates, will be includible in gross income for the taxable year to the extent not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and not previously included in gross income. If a deferred amount is required to be included in income under Section 409A, the amount also is subject to interest and an additional income tax. The interest imposed is equal to the interest at the underpayment rate plus one percentage point, imposed on the underpayments that would have occurred had the compensation been includible in income for the taxable year when first deferred, or if later, when not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. The additional income tax is equal to 20% of the compensation required to be included in gross income.
Other Tax Consequences. The foregoing discussion is not intended to be a complete description of the federal income tax aspects of Stock Awards granted under the 2000 Plan. In addition, administrative and judicial interpretations of the application of the federal income tax laws are subject to change. Furthermore, no information is given with respect to state, local or foreign tax laws that may be applicable.
New Plan Benefits
As of April 26, 2008, no options or other Stock Awards have been granted on the basis of the 400,000 share increase for which stockholder approval is sought under this Proposal 2. At the 2008 Annual Meeting, each individual who will continue to serve as a director, other than Mr. Walbert, will receive an option grant under the 2000 Plan to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value per share of common stock on the grant date.
21
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2007 regarding our equity compensation plans.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | (c)
| |
| | (a)
| | | | | | Number of Securities
| |
| | Number of Securities
| | | (b)
| | | Remaining Available
| |
| | to be Issued Upon
| | | Weighted-Average
| | | for Issuance Under
| |
| | Exercise of
| | | Exercise Price of
| | | Equity Compensation Plans
| |
| | Outstanding Options,
| | | Outstanding Options,
| | | (Excluding Securities
| |
Plan Category | | Warrants and Rights | | | Warrants and Rights(1) | | | Reflected in Column (a)) | |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | | 2,213,463 | | | $ | 9.66 | | | | 577,513 | |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 2,213,463 | | | $ | 9.66 | | | | 577,513 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Calculation of weighted-average exercise price does not include 232,141 shares issuable pursuant to deferred issuance restricted stock awards, which have no exercise price. |
We do not have in effect any equity compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance that were adopted without the approval of our stockholders.
PROPOSAL 3
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 and has further directed that management submit the selection of independent auditors for ratification by our stockholders at the annual meeting. Ernst & Young LLP has audited our financial statements since our inception in 1987. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Neither our bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors. However, the Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of different independent auditors at any time during the year if they determine that such a change would be in our best interest and the best interest of our stockholders.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be required to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP. Abstentions will be counted toward the tabulation of votes cast on proposals presented to the stockholders and will have the same effect as negative votes. Broker non-votes are counted towards a quorum, but are not counted for any purpose in determining whether this matter has been approved.
22
Auditors’ Fees
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed or to be billed by Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, to us for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
|
Audit Fees(1) | | $ | 602,000 | | | $ | 610,000 | |
Audit-related Fees | | | | | | | — | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 39,000 | | | | 39,000 | |
All Other Fees | | | | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Fees | | $ | 641,000 | | | $ | 649,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Audit fees relate to the audit of our consolidated financial statements and reviews of our consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports onForm 10-Q for 2007, accounting consultations, and review of documents filed with the SEC. |
|
(2) | | Tax related fees are for services related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. |
All fees described above were approved by the Audit Committee or the Chairman of the Audit Committee pursuant to the pre-approval policy previously adopted by the Audit Committee.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.
The Audit Committee has adopted a policy and procedures for the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services rendered by our independent auditor, Ernst & Young LLP. The policy generally pre-approves specified services in the defined categories of audit services, audit-related services, and tax services up to specified amounts. Pre-approval may also be given as part of the Audit Committee’s approval of the scope of the engagement of the independent auditor or on an individual explicitcase-by-case basis before the independent auditor is engaged to provide each service. The pre-approval of services may be delegated to one or more of the Audit Committee’s members, but the decision must be reported to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
The Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of the services other than audit services by Ernst & Young LLP is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE IN FAVOR OF PROPOSAL 3.
23
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Our officers, their positions, and ages are as follows.
| | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Occupation/
|
Name | | Age | | Position Held With the Company |
|
Timothy P. Walbert | | | 41 | | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Robert J. De Vaere | | | 50 | | | Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
Timothy C. Melkus | | | 48 | | | Senior Vice President, Business Development and Operations |
Jeffrey W. Sherman, M.D. | | | 53 | | | Senior Vice President, Research and Development, Chief Medical Officer |
Biographical information regarding each of our officers who are not also directors of the Company is as follows:
Mr. De Vaerehas served as our Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer since May 2007, was our Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer from May 2000 to March 2006, and was our Vice President, Finance and Administration from December 2001 to March 2006. From August 2006 to April 2007, Mr. De Vaere was Chief Financial Officer of Nexa Orthopedics, a medical device manufacturer. Prior to joining us in May 2000, Mr. De Vaere was with Vista Medical Technologies, Inc., a medical device company, from January 1996 to 2001, where he served as Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to his employment with Vista, he was Director of Finance and Business Management for Kaiser Electro-Optics from April 1993 to January 1996 and Controller for Kaiser Rollmet, an aerospace company, from January 1991 to April 1993. In 1980, Mr. De Vaere received a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of California, Los Angeles.
Mr. Melkusjoined IDM Pharma as Vice President, Business Development and Operations in July 2007 and was named Senior Vice President, Business Development and Operations in December 2007. Prior to joining IDM Pharma, Mr. Melkus was with NeoPharm, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from November 2006 until June 2007 where he served as Vice President, Business Development. Prior to NeoPharm, Mr. Melkus served as an Executive Consultant from January 1999 until November 2006, advising a number of clients on business planning, strategy and operational issues. From October 1995 until December 1998, Mr. Melkus served as Vice President, VIHMS Commercialization where he was responsible for Sales, Marketing, Business Development and Intellectual Property for the innovative health care services business of Monsanto. From October 1983 through September 1995, Mr. Melkus held various positions at G.D. Searle and Co., a pharmaceutical company, including Corporate Financial Analyst, U.S. Operations Field Analyst, Manager, Financial Analysis, Assistant Controller, U.S. Pharmaceutical Operations, Foreign Exchange and Investment Manager, and Associated Director, U.S. Business Development. Mr. Melkus earned a Masters in Business Administration from the J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management and earned a Bachelor of Science degree, with honors, from Northwestern University.
Dr. Shermanhas served as Chief Medical Officer and Senior Vice President Research & Development at IDM Pharma since August 2007. Before joining IDM Pharma, Dr. Sherman was Vice President of Clinical Science at Takeda Global Research and Development, a pharmaceutical research and development center, from June 2007 to August 2007. Prior to Takeda, he served as Chief Medical Officer and Executive Vice President at NeoPharm, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from September 2000 to June 2007. Dr. Sherman held various positions in Clinical Research and Development at G.D. Searle and Co. and, after its acquisition, Pharmacia Corporation, each a pharmaceutical company, including Director, Senior Director, and Executive Director of Clinical Research, for a variety of therapeutic areas, including infectious diseases, women’s health, sleep, central nervous system, and oncology from October 1992 to January 2000. He also served as Head, Oncology Global Medical Operations from January 2000 to August 2000. Prior to joining Searle/Pharmacia, Dr. Sherman worked at Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a pharmaceutical company, in Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Research from April 1988 to October 1992. Dr. Sherman received his Medical degree from The Chicago Medical School. He completed an internship and residency in internal medicine at Northwestern University, where he also served as chief medical resident. Additionally, he completed fellowship training at the University of California-San Francisco (UCSF) and was a research associate at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute at UCSF. Dr. Sherman is an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Medicine at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and a member of several professional societies as well as a Diplomat of the National Board of Medical Examiners and the American Board of Internal Medicine. Dr. Sherman is a member of the Drug Information Association (DIA) Board of Directors and chairperson of the 2008 Annual Meeting.
24
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the ownership of the Company’s common stock as of February 29, 2008 by: (i) each director and nominee for director; (ii) each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table; (iii) all executive officers and directors of the Company as a group; and (iv) all those known by the Company to be beneficial owners of more than five percent of its common stock.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Beneficial Ownership(1) | |
| | Number of
| | | Percent of
| |
Beneficial Owner | | Shares | | | Total | |
|
Palo Alto Investors, LLC and its affiliates(2) 470 University Ave. Palo Alto, CA 94301 | | | 8,337,214 | | | | 31.90 | % |
Medarex, Inc. 707 State Road Princeton, NJ 08540 | | | 2,624,279 | | | | 10.43 | % |
Sanofi-Aventis S.A. 174 Ave de France 75635 Paris CEDEX 13 France | | | 1,986,740 | | | | 7.89 | % |
Dr. Sylvie Gregoire(3) | | | 294,072 | | | | 1.15 | % |
Dr. Jean Deleage(3)(4) | | | 203,790 | | | | * | |
Dr. Edward Penhoet(3)(4) | | | 190,253 | | | | * | |
Dr. Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne | | | 188,240 | | | | * | |
Mr. Herve Duchesne de Lamotte(3) | | | 119,776 | | | | * | |
Dr. John P. McKearn(3) | | | 112,821 | | | | * | |
Dr. Bonnie Mills(3) | | | 82,047 | | | | * | |
Mr. Timothy P. Walbert(3) | | | 45,781 | | | | * | |
Mr. Michael G. Grey(3) | | | 45,499 | | | | * | |
Mr. Robert J. De Vaere(3) | | | 24,846 | | | | * | |
Dr. Robert Beck(3) | | | 19,072 | | | | * | |
Dr. Jeffrey W. Sherman | | | — | | | | | |
Mr. Timothy C. Melkus | | | — | | | | | |
Mr. Gregory J. Tibbitts | | | — | | | | | |
All executive officers and directors as a group (14 persons)(3)(4) | | | 1,326,197 | | | | 5.03 | % |
| | |
* | | Less than one percent. |
|
(1) | | This table is based upon information supplied by officers, directors and principal stockholders and Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table and subject to community property laws where applicable, the Company believes that each of the stockholders named in this table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Applicable percentages are based on 25,170,789 shares outstanding on February 29, 2008, adjusted as required by rules promulgated by the SEC. |
|
(2) | | Includes shares held by Palo Alto Healthcare Master Fund, L.P., Palo Alto Healthcare Master Fund II, L.P, Micro Cap Partners, L.P., Palo Alto Fund II, L.P., Palo Alto Small Cap Master Fund, L.P., and UBTI Free, L.P. William L. Edwards and A. Joon Yun, M.D. share voting and investment power with respect to the shares held by Palo Alto Investors, LLC, and one or more of its affiliates, and each of such individuals disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Also includes 964,805 shares subject to warrants of which 539,765 shares will terminate in February 2012 and 425,040 shares will terminate in June 2012. |
25
| | |
(3) | | Includes shares, which certain of executive officers (including a former executive officer who is a named executive officer) and directors have the right to acquire within 60 days after February 29, 2008 pursuant to outstanding options, as follows: |
Dr. Grégoire, 294,072 shares;
Dr. Deleage, 19,072 shares;
Dr. Penhoet, 6,379 shares;
Dr. Romet-Lemonne, 162,569 shares;
Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte, 50,239 shares;
Dr. McKearn, 92,821 shares;
Dr. Mills, 82,047 shares;
Mr. Walbert, 45,781 shares;
Mr. Grey, 25,499 shares;
Mr. De Vaere, 24,846 shares; and
Dr. Beck, 19,072 shares.
| | |
(4) | | Includes 182,045 shares subject to warrants that will terminate in February 2012. The warrants are held by Alta BioPharma Partners, L.P., IDM Chase Partners (Alta Bio), LLC, Alta Embarcadero BioPharma Partners, LLC, Alta Bio Pharma Partners III, L.P., Alta BioPharma Partners III GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG and Alta Embarcadero BioPharma Partners III, LLC. Edward Penhoet, Ph.D. and Jean Deleage, Ph.D., each of whom currently serves on our Board, and Guy Nohra, Garrett Gruener, Daniel Janney, Alix Marduel, M.D., Farah Champsi and Edward Hurwitz share voting and investment power with respect to the shares held by Alta Partners and one or more of its affiliates, and each of such individuals disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of his or her pecuniary interest therein. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports in changes in ownership of our common stock and other of our equity securities. Specific due dates for these reports have been established, and we are required to disclose any failure to file by these dates during 2007. Our officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, during the year ended December 31, 2007, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with; except that a report on Form 4, Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership of Securities, covering one transaction relating to an automatic annual stock grant to a member of our Board of Directors was filed late by Dr. Deleage, and a report on Form 3, Initial Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities was filed late by Dr. Mills.
Compensation of Directors
Our directors, other than Mr. Walbert, receive annual retainer fees, payable in equal quarterly installments, for service as shown in the table below. In April 2008, our directors approved a change in the compensation to be paid to directors, effective June 25, 2008, which is also reflected in the table below.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Annual Fee | |
| | Before
| | | Effective
| |
Director Position | | June 25, 2008 | | | June 25, 2008 | |
|
Member of the Board of Directors | | $ | 20,000 | | | $ | 30,000 | |
Audit Committee Chairman | | $ | 8,000 | | | $ | 15,000 | |
Audit Committee Member | | $ | 4,000 | | | $ | 7,500 | |
Compensation Committee Chairman | | $ | 4,000 | | | $ | 10,000 | |
Compensation Committee Member | | $ | 2,000 | | | $ | 5,000 | |
Nominating Committee Chairman | | $ | 3,000 | | | $ | 5,000 | |
Nominating Committee Member | | $ | 1,500 | | | $ | 2,500 | |
26
In addition, our directors receive $2,000 for each regularly scheduled Board meeting attended in person and $1,000 for the first hour and $500 for each additional hour for each regularly scheduled Board meeting attended by telephone, and receive $750 for each regularly scheduled committee meeting. Effective June 25, 2008, with the change in retainer fees paid to Board and committee members, we will no longer pay our directors separate fees for meetings attended, either in person or by phone. We also reimburse our directors for their reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of our Board of Directors. The Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan allows participating directors to elect on an annual basis to defer a percentage of their cash compensation in a deferred compensation account pursuant to which the deferred fees are credited in the form of share units having a value equal to shares of our common stock share units, based on the market price of the stock at the time the deferred fees are earned. When a participant ceases serving as a director, the participant will be entitled to receive the value of his or her account either in a single lump-sum payment or in equal annual installments, as determined by us, in our sole discretion, provided that if the distribution amount is less than $50,000, we are required to pay it in a lump sum.
Directors are eligible to receive option grants under our stock option plan in accordance with the policy regarding non-employee director compensation adopted by the Board of Directors. This policy calls for each non-employee director to be granted annual options to purchase 5,000 shares of our common stock as of the date of each annual meeting of our stockholders, which has been increased to 10,000 shares of our common stock effective as of June 25, 2008. The shares subject to such option vest monthly over a 12 month period, provided the director remains a director upon the date of his re-election to our Board. Newly appointed or elected non-employee directors are eligible for a 20,000-share option grant under this policy with monthly vesting over a 48 month period. In January 2008, Michael G. Grey, a current member of the Board, received a restricted stock grant of 20,000 shares in his capacity as newly appointed Non-Executive Chairman of the Board.
The following table shows for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 certain information with respect to the compensation of all non-employee directors of the Company:
Director Compensation for Fiscal 2007
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change in
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Pension
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Value and
| | | | | | | |
| | Fees Earned
| | | | | | | | | Non-Equity
| | | Nonqualified
| | | | | | | |
| | or Paid
| | | Stock
| | | Option
| | | Incentive Plan
| | | Deferred
| | | | | | | |
| | in Cash
| | | Awards
| | | Awards
| | | Compensation
| | | Compensation
| | | All Other
| | | Total
| |
Name
| | ($)
| | | ($)(1)
| | | ($)(1)
| | | ($)
| | | Earnings
| | | Compensation
| | | ($)
| |
(a) | | (b) | | | (c) | | | (d) | | | (e) | | | (f) | | | (g) | | | (h) | |
|
Dr. Robert Beck | | | 51,092 | | | | — | | | | 28,048 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 79,140 | |
Dr. Jean Deleage | | | 51,250 | | | | — | | | | 28,048 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 79,298 | |
Dr. Donald Drakeman(2) | | | 23,871 | | | | — | | | | 14,730 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 38,601 | |
Dr. Sylvie Gregoire(3) | | | 39,000 | | | | — | | | | 164,796 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 203,796 | |
Mr. Michael G. Grey | | | 50,357 | | | | — | | | | 28,048 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 78,405 | |
Dr. David Haselkorn(4) | | | 1,467 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,467 | |
Dr. John P. McKearn | | | 45,099 | | | | 56,001 | (5) | | | 351,235 | (5) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 40,500 | (6) | | | 492,835 | |
Dr. Edward Penhoet(7) | | | 27,698 | | | | — | | | | 21,654 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 49,352 | |
Mr. Gregory J. Tibbitts(8) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | |
(1) | | Amounts are calculated utilizing the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, “Share-based Payments”. See Note 4 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for a discussion of the assumptions underlying valuation of our equity awards. |
|
(2) | | Dr. Drakeman resigned from the Board in June 2007. |
|
(3) | | Dr. Grégoire also received compensation during the year ended December 31, 2007 for consulting services in her role as Executive Chair, which ended on June 30, 2007. See “Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2007” below for further details relating to such compensation. |
|
(4) | | Dr. Haselkorn resigned from the Board in January 2007. |
27
| | |
(5) | | Dr. McKearn also received a stock option to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and 20,000 restricted stock awards in connection with his services as a consultant, resulting in an option award compensation and stock award compensation of $326,815 and $56,001, respectively, which was considered as a general and administrative expense. |
|
(6) | | Dr. McKearn provided consulting service to the Company from May 2007 to July 2007. This compensation represents $40,500 of consulting fees during the consulting period. |
|
(7) | | Dr. Penhoet was elected to the Board in April 2007. Pursuant to the policy regarding non-employee director compensation previously adopted by the Board, Dr. Penhoet received an initial option grant to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock under the 2000 Plan upon his election to the Board. |
|
(8) | | Mr. Tibbitts was elected to the Board in April 2008. Pursuant to the policy regarding non-employee director compensation previously adopted by the Board, Mr. Tibbitts received an initial option grant to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock under the 2000 Plan upon his election to the Board. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This section discusses the principles underlying our executive compensation decisions and the most important factors relevant to an analysis of these decisions. We are providing this information regarding the manner and context in which compensation is awarded to and earned by our executive officers to place in perspective the data presented in the tables and other quantitative information that follows this section.
Executive compensation philosophy and objectives
The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for establishing, implementing and overseeing our executive compensation and benefit policies, including our 2000 Plan. The compensation of our executive officers is designed to attract executives with the ability, skills and commitment necessary for IDM Pharma to achieve its strategic goals, to reward those individuals adequately and fairly over time, and to retain those individuals who continue to perform at or above our expectations. The Compensation Committee’s overall objective is to make compensation decisions that motivate and reward achievement of the Company’s business objectives, particularly focused on the objective of obtaining marketing approval of our lead product candidate, L-MTP-PE (mifamurtide) for the treatment of osteosarcoma, and disciplined management of our financial resources. Our executive officers’ compensation has three primary components — base salary, discretionary cash bonuses, either based on annual achievement of target objectives or achievement of a specific performance milestone or strategic objective, and long-term incentive compensation primarily in the form of stock options and restricted stock awards. In addition, our executive officers are provided with benefits that are generally available to all of our salaried employees.
Our Compensation Committee views the three components of our executive compensation as related but distinct. Although our Compensation Committee does consider total compensation, we do not believe that significant compensation of one type should necessarily negate or reduce other types of compensation because each component of compensation serves a purpose in rewarding and motivating our executives. Our Compensation Committee has not adopted any formal or informal policies or guidelines for allocating compensation between long-term and currently paid-out compensation, between cash and non-cash compensation, or among different forms of compensation. This is due in part to the small size of our executive team and the need to tailor each executive officer’s award to attract and retain that executive officer. Our Compensation Committee determines the appropriate level for each compensation component based in part, but not exclusively, on our Company view of internal equity and consistency, individual performance and other information the Compensation Committee deems relevant, such as compensation survey data from Radford and compensation data of comparable companies, including Dendreon, Cell Genesys, Avax Technologies, Antigenics, Micromet, Novacea, and Favrille.
During 2006, our Board of Directors appointed an Executive Chair of the Board, who served as a consultant to the Company through June 2007, responsible for advising and consulting with the Company’s management with regard to operations of the Company, including particularly the Company’s achievement of defined milestone events and such other duties and responsibilities as the Board or any committee of the Board prescribed. The
28
compensation for consulting services provided by the Executive Chair were determined by the Board, with the Executive Chair abstaining from the determination, and were set forth in a consulting agreement between the Company and the Executive Chair. Although the consulting services of the Executive Chair ended in June 2007, the director continued in the role of Executive Chair through December 2007.
Primary components of executive compensation
As described above, the aggregate compensation paid to our executive officers is comprised of three primary components: base salary, discretionary cash bonuses, and long-term incentive compensation primarily in the form of stock options and restricted stock awards. Each component is described below in more detail.
Base salary. Our Compensation Committee fixes the base salary of each of our executive officers at a level it believes enables us to hire and retain these individuals and reward our executive officers for satisfactory individual performance and a satisfactory level of contribution to our overall business goals. In determining the base salaries of our executive officers, the Compensation Committee also takes into account the base salaries paid to executives of other companies with which we believe we compete for talent, including companies of similar size and stage of development in the biotechnology industry, as well as other private and public companies located in our geographical location and which take part in annual compensation surveys. The base salary of each of our executive officers was initially established under employment agreements with those executive officers that took these factors into account. We entered into employment agreements with Drs. Romet-Lemonne and Mills in connection with the Combination (as described below) completed in August 2005, and Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte entered into an employment agreement with our subsidiary, now named IDM Pharma S.A., in 1998 which was amended in August 2005 to provide him with certain benefits upon termination of his employment We entered into employment agreements with Mr. Walbert and Mr. De Vaere in May 2007, with Dr. Sherman in July 2007, and Mr. Melkus in December 2007. For newly hired executive officers, the base salary would be initially established through negotiation at the time the executive officer is hired, taking into account the executive officer’s qualifications, experience, prior salary and competitive salary information and any particular circumstance that motivated the executive officer to leave his or her prior position and join IDM Pharma. Year-to-year adjustments to each executive officer’s base salary, if any, are based upon individual performance for that year, changes in the general level of base salaries of persons in comparable positions within our industry and geographical location, and the average merit salary increase for such year for all of our employees, as well as other factors the Compensation Committee judges to be pertinent during that assessment period. Generally, the salaries for our executive officers are adjusted effective in the last quarter of each year or the first quarter of the following year. When reviewing executive compensation and making executive hiring decisions, the Compensation Committee takes into account publicly available data relating to the compensation practices and policies of other companies within and outside of our industry as well as input from other sources, including input from other independent members of our Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee has in the past engaged compensation consultants to provide information for use in establishing or revising executive compensation and may do so in the future but did not use a compensation consultant to establish compensation for 2007. Our Compensation Committee realizes that benchmarking the Company’s compensation against the compensation earned at comparable companies may not always be appropriate, but believes that comparison of the Company’s compensation practices is useful because it defines the competitive environment for hiring and retaining executive officers that the Company faces.
Discretionary cash bonuses. Although the employment agreements with our executive officers established target bonus amounts for any fiscal year, the annual cash bonus payments to our executive officers are entirely discretionary for 2007 and any subsequent year. We use annual incentive bonuses to compensate our executive officers for achieving Company financial and operational goals. These objectives relate generally to Company-wide goals and performance objectives and other strategic factors including progress on development and regulatory objectives with regard to our product development candidates, particularly L-MTP-PE and for 2007, UVIDEM, financial objectives such as raising capital and managing our existing resources, and strategic business development or corporate development objectives. Our Compensation Committee believes that it is most appropriate and meaningful at this point in the life cycle of the Company to determine discretionary cash bonus amounts, if any, of our Chief Executive Officer based in part upon our management team’s performance and achievement of Company-wide goals as a whole, as well as the Chief Executive Officer and management team’s performance against specific
29
business development or corporate development transactions. Our Compensation Committee bases its determination of discretionary cash bonus amounts, if any, to our executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer, on our management team’s performance and achievement of Company-wide goals as a whole, performance against specific business development or corporate development transactions, as well as achievement of individual objectives that focus on the executive officer’s operational responsibilities. Bonus payment recommendations for executive officers are initiated by the Chief Executive Officer and submitted to the Compensation Committee for review.
Long-term equity incentive awards. We primarily use stock options and restricted stock awards to reward long-term performance. Our grant of stock options and restricted stock awards is intended to produce significant value for each executive officer if our performance is outstanding and if the executive officer stays with the Company. To conserve our cash resources, we place special emphasis on equity-based incentives to attract, retain and motivate executive officers as well as other employees. The Compensation Committee provides our executive officers with long-term incentive compensation through grants of stock options and restricted stock awards, generally under the 2000 Plan. We believe that stock options provide our executive officers with the opportunity to purchase and maintain an equity interest in IDM Pharma and to share in the appreciation of the value of our common stock. We believe that stock options align employee incentives with the interests of our stockholders because options have value only if our stock price increases over time. The stock options also utilize vesting periods, generally daily vesting over a four-year period following the date of grant for existing employees, that encourage executive officers to continue their employment with us. We also use stock awards, primarily in the form of deferred issuance restricted stock awards, as additional incentive for our executive officers. These stock awards may vest over a period of time, or earlier upon achievement of a significant corporate objective or event, as was the case with the stock awards granted to our executive officers in January 2008. They may also vest only upon achievement of a significant corporate objective or event and otherwise expire if the objective or event is not met by a certain date, as is the case with the stock awards granted to our executive officers in April 2008. This provides added incentive for our executive officers to focus on and achieve milestones which our Board has established and which we believe are in the best interests of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee considers the grant of each option or other stock award subjectively, considering factors such as the individual performance of the executive officer and the anticipated contribution of the executive officer to the attainment of our long-term strategic performance goals. Long-term incentives granted in prior years are also taken into consideration. Grants are made to all employees when hired based on salary level and position. All employees, including executive officers, are eligible for subsequent, discretionary grants, which are generally based on either individual or corporate performance as well as position within the Company. All of the stock option grants made to our executive officers in 2007 and to date in 2008 were made at the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, determined by the closing market value of our common stock as reported on The Nasdaq Global Market on the date of grant. We do not have any program, plan or obligation that requires us to grant equity compensation to any executive officers on specified dates. The authority to make equity grants to executive officers rests with our Compensation Committee, although, as noted above, the Compensation Committee does consider the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer in setting the compensation of our other executive officers.
Severance benefits
Each of Messrs. Walbert, De Vaere, Melkus, Duchesne de Lamotte and Drs. Sherman and Mills has a provision in his or her employment agreement providing for certain severance benefits, including accelerated vesting of certain stock awards, in the event of termination of the executive officer’s employment without cause or the executive officer’s resignation of employment with good reason. These severance provisions are described in the “Employment, Change of Control and Severance Agreements” section below, and certain estimates of these change of control benefits are provided in “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” section below.
Other benefits
Our executive officers are eligible to participate in all of our employee benefit plans, such as medical, dental, vision, group life and disability insurance and our 401(k) plan, in each case on the same basis as our other employees. Except for Mr. Walbert, who was provided with temporary living expenses of $4,500 per month for six
30
months when he joined the company in May 2007, and extended for a further six months in January 2008, there were no special benefits or significant perquisites provided to any executive officer in 2007.
Material tax and accounting implications of executive compensation policies
We account for the equity compensation expense for our employees under the rules of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” as interpreted by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, “FAS 123(R),” which requires us to estimate and record an expense for each award of equity compensation over the service period of the award. Accounting rules also require us to record cash compensation as an expense at the time the obligation is accrued. Unless and until we achieve sustained profitability, the availability to us of a tax deduction for compensation expense is not material to our financial position. We structure discretionary cash bonus compensation so that it is taxable to our employees at the time it becomes available to them. Federal income tax law prohibits publicly held companies from deducting certain compensation paid to a named executive officer that exceeds $1 million during the tax year. To the extent that compensation is based upon the attainment of performance goals set by the Compensation Committee pursuant to plans approved by our stockholders, the compensation is not included in the computation of this limit. Although the Compensation Committee intends, to the extent feasible and where it believes it is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders, to attempt to qualify executive compensation as tax deductible, it does not intend to permit this tax provision to dictate the Compensation Committee’s development and execution of effective compensation plans.
Executive compensation review process
Our Compensation Committee currently performs an annual review of our executive officers’ cash compensation and share and equity incentive holdings to determine whether they provide adequate incentives and motivation to our executive officers and whether they adequately compensate our executive officers relative to comparable executive officers in other companies. Compensation Committee meetings have sometimes included, for all or a portion of each meeting, not only the committee members but also our Executive Chair and our Chief Executive Officer. For compensation decisions relating to executive officers (other than our Chief Executive Officer) including decisions regarding the grant of equity compensation, the Compensation Committee typically considers the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer. The charter for our Compensation Committee provides for the Compensation Committee to evaluate the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers in light of relevant corporate performance goals and objectives and to recommend to the Board for determination and approval the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. Our Compensation Committee has authority under its charter to administer the Company’s stock plans and approve grants and awards under those plans.
2007 Executive compensation decisions
December 2006 and March 2007 Compensation Committee meetings. Our Compensation Committee reviewed compensation matters in December 2006, at which time it approved stock option grants to employees other than the Chief Executive Officer, including Dr. Mills and Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte, to recognize employee achievements, but the Compensation Committee postponed its annual compensation review for 2006 pending completion of a financing of the Company. At meetings held in March 2007, our Compensation Committee recommended, and our Board approved compensation for our executive officers for 2007, as well as discretionary cash bonuses and stock awards for performance in 2006. The 2007 base salaries, and cash bonuses and stock awards for performance in 2006 for our named executive officers, were reflected in the summary compensation table in our proxy statement for our 2007 annual meeting of stockholders.
December 2007 and March 2008 Compensation Committee meetings. Our Compensation Committee reviewed compensation matters in December 2007, at which time, and in consideration of the Company’s decision to restructure and seek strategic alternatives available to it, the Compensation Committee approved a retention program for certain key, non-executive employees, and made a recommendation to the Board regarding a retention plan for the executive officers of the Company and the Compensation Committee postponed its annual compensation review for 2007. The Board approved the recommendations of the Compensation Committee regarding a retention plan for the executive officers of the Company in January 2008. Under the terms of the retention plan, if a
31
specified executive officer is terminated without cause prior to August 31, 2008 (8 months), the executive officer will be entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to his base salary, less standard deductions and withholding, for the period from the date of termination through August 31, 2008. This cash payment would be in addition to any payment to which the specified executive officer is entitled under his employment agreement. Upon a change of control of the Company or a financing of at least $7,000,000 in gross proceeds to the Company, a cash bonus will be payable to those specified executive officers who are employees of the Company immediately prior to the closing of such change of control or financing of at least $7,000,000. The specified executive officers were also granted a deferred issuance restricted stock unit award. The shares of common stock subject to each award vest one year from the date of grant with vesting accelerated in connection with a change of control or termination without cause, and will be issued upon the earlier of (a) the60-month anniversary of the date of grant, (b) the specified executive officer’s termination without cause, or (c) the executive’s death or disability. In approving the retention programs for its employees, the Board and the Compensation Committee intended to provide appropriate incentives for the Company’s employees to remain with the Company through a time period that is critical to the Company’s ability to attain its regulatory objectives with regard to L-MPT-PE and to potentially facilitate the achievement of a strategic transaction involving the Company.
At a meeting held in March 2008, the Compensation Committee performed a review of our executive officer’s cash compensation and share and option holdings in order to recommend to the Board the compensation for our executive officers for 2008. After completing its review, our Compensation Committee took the following compensation actions at this meeting:
| | |
| • | 2008 base salaries: In arriving at its recommendations regarding base salaries, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s executive officers’ compensation relative to the 50th percentile in base salaries for comparable positions at comparable companies, according to the Radford Survey, as well as reviewing base salaries paid to executive officers at peer biotechnology companies which compete in the oncologyand/or immunotherapy sector. Following its review, in order to bring the base salaries of the Company’s executive officers (in the context of overall compensation to executive officers) in line with the comparable measures described above, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board an increase of $20,000, or 5.1%, in Mr. Walbert’s base salary, an increase in Mr. De Vaere’s base salary of $11,000, or 2.6%, an increase in Mr. Melkus’ bases salary of $15,000, or 6.8%, and an increase in Dr. Sherman’s base salary of $11,000, or 2.6%. All of the recommended increases were to take effect on April 1, 2008. The Board ratified the recommendation of the Compensation Committee with regard to executive officer base salaries for 2008. The 2008 base salaries for our named executive officers are as follows: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Jan-Mar 2008
| | | Apr-Dec 2008
| |
Executive Officer | | Base Salary | | | Base Salary | |
|
Timothy P. Walbert, President and Chief Executive Officer | | $ | 390,000 | | | $ | 410,000 | |
Robert J. De Vaere, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 311,000 | |
Timothy C. Melkus, Senior Vice President, Business Development and Operations | | $ | 220,000 | | | $ | 235,000 | |
Jeffrey W. Sherman, M.D., Senior Vice President, Research and Development, Chief Medical Officer | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 311,000 | |
| | |
| • | 2007 discretionary cash bonuses: In determining the 2007 discretionary cash bonus amounts for our executive officers, the Compensation Committee reviewed performance assessments and compensation recommendations made by our Chief Executive Officer at meetings held in December 2007 and March 2008. In light of the Company’s decision to restructure and seek strategic alternatives available to it, the Chief Executive Officer recommended and the Compensation Committee determined not to provide a 2007 bonus to the Company’s executives. The Compensation Committee determined that the executive officers should be provided with the opportunity to receive performance bonuses in the future in the event the Company |
32
| | |
| | completed a qualifying transaction resulting in a change in control of the Company, or a financing of at least $7,000,000 in gross proceeds to the Company. The potential performance bonus which could be achieved by Mr. Walbert under this plan is $300,000, by Mr. De Vaere is $150,000, by Mr. Melkus is $75,000 and by Dr. Sherman is $75,000. The Board ratified the recommendation of the Compensation Committee not to award discretionary cash bonuses for executive officer performance in 2007 and to allow for potential performance bonuses as part of the retention plan for executive officers approved by the Board. |
| | |
| • | Equity compensation: In light of the Company’s decision to restructure and seek strategic alternatives available to it, and in connection with the implementation of an executive officer retention plan, the Compensation Committee also recommended, and the Board approved, the grant of deferred issuance restricted stock units for 135,000 shares to Mr. Walbert, 60,000 shares to Mr. De Vaere, 30,000 shares to Dr. Sherman, and 25,000 shares to Mr. Melkus. The shares vest over one year and vesting will accelerate in connection with a qualifying transaction resulting in a change in control of the Company. The Compensation Committee also recommended, and the Board approved, the grant of performance or milestone based deferred issuance restricted stock units of 98,000 shares for Mr. Walbert, 54,000 shares for Mr. De Vaere, 43,000 shares for Dr. Sherman, and 43,000 shares for Mr. Melkus. The milestone based shares will only vest upon achievement of the related performance objective. In reaching its decision to provide multiple stock grants to the Company’s executive officers as part of total compensation for 2008, the Board considered several factors. The initial stock grant was made in connection with a retention plan aimed at providing incentives to retain the services of the executive officers through August 2008 in order to assess alternatives available to the Company and potentially complete a strategic transaction during that time. The second stock grant was made to provide added incentive to the executive officers to achieve a specific milestone and the shares will only vest if the Committee for Human Medicinal Products (“CHMP”) issues a positive opinion with respect to L-MTP-PE by December 31, 2008, provided that the vesting of the shares will be accelerated in connection with a change of control of the Company or termination without cause of the specified executive officer prior to the date the CHMP issues a positive opinion with respect to MTP-PE or December 31, 2008. The Board also considered the number of shares included in prior grants to the executive officers, the current value and potential value of those shares, the number of shares awarded in stock grants to non-executive employees at the same time and with the same vesting terms, and the expense to the Company relative to other options available to it in making its decision to provide multiple stock grants, as well as survey data and equity compensation at comparable companies. |
Compensation of Executive Chair
During a portion of 2007, we had a consulting agreement with the Executive Chair of our Board of Directors which provided for compensation for the consulting services provided by the Executive Chair as determined by the Board. The Executive Chair was not an employee of the Company and was not entitled to the compensation and benefits provided to our executive officers as described above. As described above, the Executive Chair was engaged as a consultant over a limited period of time to advise and consult with the Company’s management with regard to operations of the Company, including particularly the Company’s achievement of defined milestone events and such other duties and responsibilities as the Board or any committee of the Board may prescribe. The Executive Chair’s compensation under the consulting agreement included cash compensation of $10,000 per month and stock options for 600,000 shares that would vest and become exercisable only upon the achievement by the Company of defined milestone events, the achievement of which are determined in the sole discretion of the Board. As of December 31, 2007, milestone events related to vesting of 300,000 shares were achieved and the remaining options expired without vesting. The stock options granted to the Executive Chair had an exercise price equal to the closing price per share of the Company’s common stock on the applicable date of grant as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market.
Compensation of former Chief Executive Officer
Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne, M.D. became our Chief Executive Officer upon the closing of the share exchange transaction between Epimmune Inc. and the shareholders of IDM S.A. (now referred to as IDM Pharma S.A., our wholly-owned subsidiary), completed on August 16, 2005, referred to as the Combination, and served as Chairman of the Board
33
from the closing of the Combination in August 2005 to 2006. Dr. Romet-Lemonne terminated service with the Company on May 25, 2007 and resigned from the Board of Directors on July 18, 2007. In 2007, prior to his termination of service, Dr. Romet-Lemonne’s base salary was unchanged from 2006 at $385,000. Dr. Romet-Lemonne also received a discretionary cash bonus of $50,000 in 2007 related to performance in 2006, as approved by the Board following the February 2007 financing. Under his employment agreement with the Company entered into in connection with the closing of the Combination in August 2005, as amended in July 2007, Dr. Romet-Lemonne was entitled to severance benefits upon termination of his employment by the Company without cause or his resignation with good reason. These severance provisions are described in the “Employment, Change of Control and Severance Agreements” section below. Under the terms of his amended employment agreement, Dr. Romet-Lemonne received $176,861 in total salary through the date of his resignation, a discretionary bonus of $50,000, severance payments of $223,735, and payout of accrued vacation, 401(k) plan obligations, and life insurance of $68,099.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table shows for fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, compensation awarded to or paid to, or earned by, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and its three other most highly compensated executive officers at December 31, 2007 (including Dr. Romet-Lemonne, who served as our Chief Executive Officer until May 25, 2007, Mr. de Lamotte, who served as our Principal Financial and Accounting Officer until May 9, 2007, and Dr. Grégoire, who served as our Executive Chair until December 3, 2007.) (the “Named Executive Officers”).
Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2007 and 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Stock
| | | Option
| | | All Other
| | | | |
| | | | | Salary
| | | Bonus
| | | Awards
| | | Awards
| | | Compensation
| | | Total
| |
Name and Principal Position
| | Year
| | | ($)
| | | ($)(1)
| | | ($)(2)
| | | ($)(2)
| | | ($)
| | | ($)
| |
(a) | | (b) | | | (c) | | | (d) | | | (e) | | | (f) | | | (g) | | | (h) | |
|
Mr. Timothy P. Walbert, | | | 2007 | | | | 216,000 | | | | — | | | | 80,338 | | | | 76,454 | | | | 19,833 | (3) | | | 392,625 | |
President and Chief Executive Officer | | | 2006 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Mr. Robert J. De Vaere, | | | 2007 | | | | 186,923 | | | | — | | | | 41,892 | | | | 95,707 | | | | 5,919 | (5) | | | 330,441 | |
Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(4) | | | 2006 | | | | 84,224 | | | | 141,000 | | | | 79,385 | | | | — | | | | 113,218 | (6) | | | 417,827 | |
Dr. Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne, | | | 2007 | | | | 176,861 | (7) | | | 50,000 | | | | 70,722 | | | | 267,841 | | | | 291,834 | (8) | | | 849,362 | |
Former Chief Executive Officer | | | 2006 | | | | 385,000 | (7) | | | 50,000 | | | | 75,527 | | | | 111,729 | | | | 14,336 | (9) | | | 636,592 | |
Dr. Jeffrey W. Sherman, | | | 2007 | | | | 117,692 | | | | — | | | | 5,530 | | | | 9,118 | | | | 2,804 | (5) | | | 135,144 | |
Senior Vice President, Research & Development and Chief Medical Officer | | | 2006 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Mr. Timothy C. Melkus, | | | 2007 | | | | 128,996 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14,806 | | | | — | | | | 143,802 | |
Senior Vice President, Business Development and Operations | | | 2006 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Mr. Hervé Duchesne de Lamotte, | | | 2007 | | | | 268,910 | (10) | | | 43,644 | (10) | | | 19,362 | | | | 96,429 | | | | — | | | | 428,345 | |
General Manager and Vice President Finance, Europe | | | 2006 | | | | 240,335 | (10) | | | 40,000 | | | | 15,607 | | | | 41,441 | | | | — | | | | 337,383 | |
Dr. Sylvie Grégoire, | | | 2007 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 164,796 | (12) | | | 60,000 | (13) | | | 224,792 | |
Executive Chair(11) | | | 2006 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 592,169 | (14) | | | 43,796 | (13) | | | 635,965 | |
Dr. Bonnie Mills, | | | 2007 | | | | 231,789 | | | | 50,000 | | | | 14,826 | | | | 105,755 | | | | 6,750 | (5) | | | 409,120 | |
Vice President, Clinical Operations | | | 2006 | | | | 230,000 | | | | 45,500 | | | | 11,949 | | | | 35,664 | | | | 6,600 | (5) | | | 329,713 | |
| | |
(1) | | The Compensation Committee approved a bonus to the Company’s executives for 2006 performance in February 2007 upon the completion of the February 20, 2007 financing. |
|
(2) | | Amounts are calculated utilizing the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-based Payments”. See Note 4 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for a discussion of the assumptions underlying valuation of our equity awards. |
|
(3) | | This amount represents reimbursement for temporary living expenses. |
34
| | |
(4) | | Mr. De Vaere served as our Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer beginning in May 2000 and resigned effective March 31, 2006. He worked as a consultant for the Company from April to June 2006. Mr. De Vaere rejoined the company in May 2007 as Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
(5) | | This amount represents a 401(k) matching contribution. |
|
(6) | | Includes $94,418 paid in connection with a retention plan and $18,800 in consulting fees. |
|
(7) | | 12% of this amount is paid by IDM Pharma S.A. in compensation for the position of President and CEO of IDM Pharma S.A. |
|
(8) | | This amount includes severance from June 13, 2007 to December 31, 2007 of $223,735, vacation payout in connection with termination of $57,751, 401(k) matching contribution of $6,750 and life insurance paid by IDM Pharma S.A. of $3,598. |
|
(9) | | This amount includes a 401(k) matching contribution of $6,600 and life insurance premiums paid by IDM Pharma S.A. of $7,736. |
|
(10) | | This amount, paid in euros, was converted using the average euro to dollar exchange rate per the Federal Reserve Bank of New York noon buying rates. For the year 2007 and 2006, the exchange rate was 1.37074 and 1.2563 dollar per euro, respectively. |
|
(11) | | On August 10, 2006, Dr. Grégoire was appointed the Executive Chair of the Board of Directors and entered into a consulting agreement with the Company. Dr. Grégoire’s compensation under the terms of the agreement included both cash compensation of $10,000 per month and 600,000 nonstatutory stock options that vested and become exercisable upon the achievement by the Company of defined milestone events by specified dates through June 30, 2007. If a particular milestone event was not met on or before the date specified in the agreement, all options related to that particular milestone event terminated. During the fourth quarter of 2006, three of the milestones were met. The milestones with specified achievement dates occurring in the first six months of 2007 were not achieved and the agreement was terminated on June 30, 2007. |
|
(12) | | Dr. Grégoire also received a stock option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in April 2007 in connection with her services as a consultant, resulting in this compensation expense which is considered as a general and administrative expense. |
|
(13) | | Amount represents consulting fees paid in connection with specific missions undertaken as Executive Chair. These fees are separate from compensation received by Dr. Grégoire for services as a non-employee director, which are set forth in the table entitled “Director Compensation for Fiscal 2007” above. |
|
(14) | | During the fourth quarter of 2006 three of the milestones were met, resulting in this compensation expense which is considered as a general and administrative expense. |
35
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table shows for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, certain information regarding grants of plan-based awards to the Named Executive Officers:
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2007
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | All Other
| | | All Other
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Stock
| | | Option
| | | | | | Grant
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Awards:
| | | Awards:
| | | Exercise
| | | Date Fair
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Number
| | | Number of
| | | or Base
| | | Value of
| |
| | | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive
| | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive
| | | of Shares
| | | Securities
| | | Price of
| | | Stock and
| |
| | | | | Plan Awards | | | Plan Awards | | | of Stock
| | | Underlying
| | | Option
| | | Option
| |
| | Grant
| | | Threshold
| | | Target
| | | Maximum
| | | Threshold
| | | Target
| | | Maximum
| | | or Units
| | | Options
| | | Awards
| | | Awards
| |
Name
| | Date
| | | ($)
| | | ($)
| | | ($)
| | | ($)
| | | ($)
| | | ($)
| | | (#)
| | | (#)
| | | ($/Sh)
| | | ($)(1)
| |
(a) | | (b) | | | (c) | | | (d) | | | (e) | | | (f) | | | (g) | | | (h) | | | (i) | | | (j) | | | (k) | | | (l) | |
|
Mr. Timothy P. Walbert | | | 6/14/07 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 200,000 | | | | 3.18 | | | | 636,000 | |
| | | 6/14/07 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 80,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | 254,400 | |
Mr. Robert J. De Vaere | | | 5/2/07 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 88,082 | | | | 8.02 | | | | 706,418 | |
| | | 6/13/07 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11,918 | | | | 8.02 | | | | 95,582 | |
| | | 6/13/07 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 40,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | 320,800 | |
Dr. Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne | | | 4/9/07 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 50,000 | | | | 7.18 | | | | 359,000 | |
Dr. Jeffrey W. Sherman | | | 8/29/07 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 100,000 | | | | 1.64 | | | | 164,000 | |
| | | 8/29/07 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 20,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | 32,800 | |
Mr. Timothy C. Melkus | | | 7/16/07 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 62,500 | | | | 2.59 | | | | 161,875 | |
Mr. Hervé Duchesne de Lamotte | | | 4/9/07 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 50,000 | | | | 7.18 | | | | 359,000 | |
Dr. Sylvie Grégoire(2) | | | 4/9/07 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 25,000 | | | | 7.18 | | | | 179,500 | |
| | | 6/14/07 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,000 | | | | 3.58 | | | | 17,900 | |
Dr. Bonnie Mills | | | 4/9/07 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 50,000 | | | | 7.18 | | | | 359,000 | |
| | |
(1) | | Amounts are calculated utilizing the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-based Payments”. See Note 4 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for a discussion of the assumptions underlying valuation of our equity awards. |
|
(2) | | Dr. Grégoire also received compensation during the year ended December 31, 2007 for services as a non-employee director. See the table entitled “Director Compensation for Fiscal 2007” above for further details relating to such compensation. |
Employment, Change of Control and Severance Agreements
Current Agreements. On June 6, 2005, we entered into an employment agreement with Bonnie Mills, Ph.D., Vice President, Clinical Operations. The employment agreement became effective upon the closing of the Combination and provides that Dr. Mills will serve as our Vice President, Clinical Operations. The agreement provides for a minimum annual salary of $230,000, as well as an annual performance-based bonus in a target amount of 25% of base salary. In addition, the agreement grants Dr. Mills the right to receive a restricted stock grant of up to 7,142 shares. The restricted stock grant is subject to the following terms:
| | |
| • | the restricted stock vests as to 100% of the underlying shares on the date 42 months after the effective date of the employment agreement; |
|
| • | the restricted stock is subject to accelerated vesting upon the closing of one or more transactions providing a specified level of financing to us, the timely filing of a marketing approval application with the appropriate agency with respect to L-MTP-PE, and the regulatory approval in the United States or Europe of L-MTP-PE; and |
|
| • | shares subject to the restricted stock grant that become vested will be issued to Dr. Mills on the earlier of (i) Dr. Mills’ termination, or (ii) 48 months from the effective date of the agreement. |
36
The agreement also provides for the grant of an option to purchase up to 21,428 shares of our common stock. The option grant shall vest over a four-year period with 25% of the underlying shares vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date and the balance vesting ratably on a daily basis thereafter, subject to Dr. Mills’ continuous employment with us through the applicable vesting date.
The agreement provides for continued exercisability of outstanding options to purchase ordinary shares of IDM Pharma S.A. granted to Dr. Mills prior to the effective date of the agreement which were replaced with substitute options to purchase our common stock in connection with the Combination, to the extent the current market price of the shares underlying the options is less than the exercise price of the options on the effective date of the agreement, generally until the later of (i) three months after employee’s employment termination, or (ii) December 31, 2008.
In case of termination of Dr. Mills’ employment due to death or disability, she will be entitled to full acceleration of vesting and exercisability of any outstanding options granted before the effective date of the agreement. In the event that we terminate her employment without cause (as “cause” is defined in the employment agreement), or Dr. Mills terminates her employment with good reason (as “good reason” is defined in the employment agreement), Dr. Mills will be entitled to, subject to the execution by her of an effective waiver and release of claims:
| | |
| • | severance payments, consisting of her base salary in effect at the time of termination, paid for a period of 12 months (or, at her option, payment in a lump sum of such amount), in the case of termination without cause, and, in the case of termination by Dr. Mills with good reason, such severance shall be paid from the date of termination until the earlier of 12 months or until the date she begins full time employment with another entity; |
|
| • | reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums, for up to 12 months in the case of termination with good reason or termination without cause, or until the date she begins full time employment with another entity, up to the maximum period permitted under COBRA; |
|
| • | full acceleration, as of the date of termination, of vesting and exercisability of any outstanding options granted before the effective date of the agreement; and |
|
| • | full acceleration of vesting and exercisability of any unvested restricted stock or options granted pursuant to the agreement. |
On March 15, 1998, IDM Pharma S.A., now our wholly owned subsidiary, entered into an employment agreement with Hervé Duchesne de Lamotte, then its Vice President and CFO. The employment agreement became effective on April 1, 1998 and provided for a minimum salary of $100,840 (this amount was stated in French Francs (560,000 FF) and converted into US Dollars using the French Franc to Euro parity (6.55957 Francs per Euro) and the Euro to Dollar exchange rate upon creation of the Euro (1.1812 US Dollar per Euro)), as well as a performance-based bonus in a target amount of 30% of base salary for the year 1998, 10% of which were immediately paid as a sign-on bonus. The minimum salary would increase by 10% in 1999, and subsequent increases as well as bonuses would be set by the board of directors on an annual basis. The agreement also provided that Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte would benefit from a company car.
On September 2, 2002, this employment agreement was amended to reflect changes in French labor laws and reflected an increase in Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte’s minimum salary to $122,902 (this amount was stated in Euros (€130,000) and converted into US Dollars using the average exchange rate for the year 2002 (0.9454 US Dollars per Euro)).
On November 21, 2005, subsequent to the Combination, this employment agreement was further amended. The amendment became effective upon the closing of the Combination and provides that Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte will be entitled to :
| | |
| • | severance payments, consisting of his base salary in effect at the time of termination, paid for a period of 12 months in one lump sum payment at the end of the legal3-month notice period, in the case of termination by the Company without cause or at Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte’s initiative with specific reason (such specific reason is defined in the agreement) further to a change of control of IDM Pharma S.A. or IDM Pharma, and, |
37
| | |
| | in the case of termination by Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte with specific reason (such specific reason is defined in the agreement), such severance shall be paid by monthly installments from the date of termination until the earlier of 12 months thereafter or until the date he begins full time employment with another entity; and |
| | |
| • | benefit from the same health insurance plan that is provided by the Company to its employees until the earlier of 12 months after termination or until the date Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte begins full time employment with another entity. |
On May 2, 2007, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. De Vaere, our Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. The employment agreement provides for a minimum annual salary of $300,000, an annual discretionary performance based bonus in a target amount of 40% of base salary, an option grant for 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and a deferred issuance restricted stock grant for 40,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The stock option grant was subject to the following terms:
| | |
| • | the stock options vest daily over four years, subject to continuous employment with us; |
|
| • | the stock options are subject to accelerated vesting if Mr. De Vaere is terminated without cause (as “cause” is defined in the employment agreement) by the Company or voluntarily terminates service with the Company for good reason (as “good reason” is defined in the employment agreement); and |
|
| • | the stock options were granted at an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock as quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market on the date of the grant. |
The restricted stock grant was subject to the following terms:
| | |
| • | half of the restricted shares, or 20,000 shares, shall vest on the one year anniversary of the date of the employment agreement and the remaining half, or 20,000 shares shall vest on the two year anniversary of the employment agreement, subject to continuous employment with us; |
|
| • | the restricted stock is subject to accelerated vesting if Mr. De Vaere is terminated without cause by the Company or voluntarily terminates service with the Company for good reason; and |
|
| • | shares subject to the restricted stock grant that become vested will be issued on the earlier of (i) the executive’s termination, or (ii) 60 months from the date of the employment agreement. |
In the event that we terminate Mr. De Vaere’s employment without cause, or Mr. De Vaere terminates his employment with good reason, in each case during the term of his agreement, or upon the expiration of the term of his agreement, Mr. De Vaere would be entitled to, subject to the execution by Mr. De Vaere of an effective waiver and release of claims:
| | |
| • | severance payments, consisting of Mr. De Vaere’s base salary in effect at the time of termination, paid for a period of 6 months if such termination occurred before the one year anniversary of the agreement, or for a period of 12 months if such termination occurred after the one year anniversary of the agreement; |
|
| • | reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums for a period of up to 12 months; |
|
| • | accelerated vesting of the restricted stock such that 20,000 of the restricted shares shall be fully vested and immediately exercisable in the event that Mr. De Vaere is terminated before the first anniversary of the effective date of this agreement, and such termination is not effected within the ninety (90) days immediately preceding or the 12 months immediately following a change in control (as defined in the agreement); and |
|
| • | accelerated vesting of the stock options and the restricted stock such that on the effective date of such termination 100% of the stock options and restricted stock shall be fully vested and immediately exercisable in the event that Mr. De Vaere is terminated immediately preceding or the 12 months immediately following a change in control (as “change in control” is defined in the employment agreement), of the Company, which change in control is consummated after the first anniversary of the effective date of this agreement, or accelerated vesting of the stock options and restricted stock such that on the effective date of such termination 50% of the stock options and restricted stock that are unvested as of the effective date of such termination shall be fully vested and immediately exercisable in the event that Mr. De Vaere’s employment is |
38
| | |
| | terminated within the 90 days immediately preceding or the 12 months immediately following a change in control of the Company which change in control is consummated on or before the first anniversary of the effective date of the agreement. |
On May 25, 2007, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Walbert, our President and Chief Executive Officer. The employment agreement provided for a minimum annual salary of $390,000, an annual discretionary performance based bonus in a target amount of 50% of base salary, temporary living expenses of $4,500 per month for six months, a relocation allowance of up to $25,000, an option grant for 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and a deferred issuance restricted stock grant for 80,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The term of the temporary living expenses was subsequently extended from six to twelve months in exchange for cancellation of the $25,000 relocation allowance. The stock option grant was subject to the following terms:
| | |
| • | the stock options vest daily over four years, subject to continuous employment with us; |
|
| • | the stock options are subject to accelerated vesting if Mr. Walbert is terminated without cause by the Company or voluntarily terminates service with the Company for good reason (as “good reason” is defined in the employment agreement); and |
|
| • | the stock options were granted at an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock as quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market on the date of the grant. |
The restricted stock grant was subject to the following terms:
| | |
| • | half of the restricted shares, or 40,000 shares, shall vest on the one year anniversary of the date of the employment agreement and the remaining half, or 40,000 shares shall vest on the two year anniversary of the employment agreement, subject to continuous employment with us; |
|
| • | the restricted stock is subject to accelerated vesting if Mr. Walbert is terminated without cause (as “cause” is defined in the employment agreement) by the Company or voluntarily terminates service with the Company for good reason; and |
|
| • | shares subject to the restricted stock grant that become vested will be issued on the earlier of (i) the executive’s termination, or (ii) 60 months from the date of the employment agreement. |
In the event that we terminate Mr. Walbert’s employment without cause, or Mr. Walbert terminates his employment with good reason, in each case during the term of his agreement, or upon the expiration of the term of his agreement, Mr. Walbert would be entitled to, subject to the execution by Mr. Walbert of an effective waiver and release of claims:
| | |
| • | severance payments, consisting of Mr. Walbert’s base salary in effect at the time of termination, paid for a period of 12 months; |
|
| • | reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums for a period of up to 12 months; |
|
| • | accelerated vesting of the restricted stock such that 40,000 of the restricted stock shares shall be fully vested, and accelerated vesting of the stock options such that 25% of the stock option shares shall be deemed vested and immediately exercisable in the event Mr. Walbert is terminated before the first anniversary of the effective date of the agreement, and such termination is not in connection with a change in control (as “change in control” is defined in the employment agreement), or accelerated vesting of the restricted stock such that 100% of the restricted stock shall be fully vested in the event Mr. Walbert is terminated on or after the first anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, and such termination is not in connection with a change in control; and |
|
| • | accelerated vesting of the stock options and restricted stock such that on the effective date of such termination 100% of the stock options and restricted stock shares shall be fully vested and immediately exercisable in the event Mr. Walbert is terminated within the 90 days immediately preceding or the 12 months immediately following a change in control of the Company. |
39
On August 27, 2007, we entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Sherman, our Senior Vice President, Research and Development and Chief Medical Officer. The employment agreement provided for a minimum annual salary of $300,000, an annual discretionary performance based bonus in a target amount of 35% of base salary, an option grant for 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and a deferred issuance restricted stock grant for 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The stock option grant was subject to the following terms:
| | |
| • | the stock options vest daily over four years, subject to continuous employment with us; |
|
| • | the stock options are subject to accelerated vesting if Dr. Sherman is terminated without cause (as “cause” is defined in the employment agreement) by the Company or voluntarily terminates service with the Company for good reason (as “good reason” is defined in the employment agreement); and |
|
| • | the stock options were granted at an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock as quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market on the date of the grant. |
The restricted stock grant was subject to the following terms:
| | |
| • | half of the restricted shares, or 10,000 shares, shall vest on the one year anniversary of the date of the employment agreement and the remaining half, or 10,000 shares shall vest on the two year anniversary of the employment agreement, subject to continuous employment with us; |
|
| • | the restricted stock is subject to accelerated vesting if Dr. Sherman is terminated without cause by the Company or voluntarily terminates service with the Company for good reason, as defined in the employment agreement; and |
|
| • | shares subject to the restricted stock grant that become vested will be issued on the earlier of (i) the executive’s termination, or (ii) 60 months from the date of the employment agreement. |
In the event that we terminate Dr. Sherman’s employment without cause or Dr. Sherman terminates his employment with good reason, in each case during the term of his agreement, or upon the expiration of the term of his agreement, Dr. Sherman would be entitled to, subject to the execution by Dr. Sherman of an effective waiver and release of claims:
| | |
| • | severance payments, consisting of Dr. Sherman’s base salary in effect at the time of termination, paid for a period of 6 months if such termination occurred before the one year anniversary of the agreement, or for a period of 12 months if such termination occurred after the one year anniversary of the agreement; |
|
| • | reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums for a period of up to 12 months; |
|
| • | accelerated vesting of the restricted stock such that 20,000 of the restricted shares shall be fully vested and immediately exercisable in the event that Dr. Sherman is terminated before the first anniversary of the effective date of this agreement, and such termination is not effected within the 90 days immediately preceding or the 12 months immediately following a change in control (as defined in the agreement); and |
|
| • | accelerated vesting of the stock options and the restricted stock such that on the effective date of such termination 100% of the stock options and restricted stock shall be fully vested and immediately exercisable in the event that Dr. Sherman is terminated immediately preceding or the 12 months immediately following a change in control (as “change in control” is defined in the employment agreement), of the Company, which change in control is consummated after the first anniversary of the effective date of this agreement, or accelerated vesting of the stock options and restricted stock such that on the effective date of such termination 50% of the stock options and restricted stock that are unvested as of the effective date of such termination shall be fully vested and immediately exercisable in the event that Dr. Sherman’s employment is terminated within the 90 days immediately preceding or the 12 months immediately following a change in control of the Company which change in control is consummated on or before the first anniversary of the effective date of the agreement. |
On December 3, 2007, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Melkus, our Senior Vice President, Business Development and Operations. The employment agreement provided for a minimum annual salary of $220,000 and an annual discretionary performance based bonus in a target amount of 30% of base salary.
40
In the event that we terminate Mr. Melkus’ employment without cause (as “cause” is defined in the employment agreement), or Mr. Melkus terminates his employment with good reason (as “good reason” is defined in the employment agreement), in each case during the term of his agreement, or upon the expiration of the term of his agreement, Mr. Melkus would be entitled to, subject to the execution by Mr. Melkus of an effective waiver and release of claims:
| | |
| • | severance payments, consisting of Mr. Melkus’ base salary in effect at the time of termination, paid for a period of 6 months if such termination occurred before the one year anniversary of the agreement, or for a period of 12 months if such termination occurred after the one year anniversary of the agreement; |
|
| • | reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums for a period of up to 12 months; |
|
| • | accelerated vesting of the stock award such that 100% of the stock award shall be fully vested and immediately exercisable in the event that Mr. Melkus is terminated before the first anniversary of the effective date of this agreement, and such termination is not effected within the 90 days immediately preceding or the 12 months immediately following a change in control (as defined in the agreement); and |
|
| • | accelerated vesting of the stock award such that on the effective date of such termination 100% of the stock award shall be fully vested and immediately exercisable in the event that Mr. Melkus is terminated immediately preceding or the 12 months immediately following a change in control (as “change in control” is defined in the employment agreement), of the Company, which change in control is consummated after the first anniversary of the effective date of this agreement, or accelerated vesting of the stock award such that on the effective date of such termination 50% of the stock award that is unvested as of the effective date of such termination shall be fully vested and immediately exercisable in the event that Mr. Melkus’ employment is terminated within the 90 days immediately preceding or the 12 months immediately following a change in control of the Company which change in control is consummated on or before the first anniversary of the effective date of the agreement. |
Prior Agreements. On April 21, 2005, we entered into an employment agreement with Jean-LoupRomet-Lemonne, M.D., then the President and Chief Executive Officer of IDM Pharma S.A. The employment agreement became effective upon the closing of the Combination and provided that Dr. Romet-Lemonne would serve as our Chief Executive Officer. The agreement provided for a minimum annual salary of $385,000, as well as an annual performance-based bonus in a target amount of 35% of base salary. In addition, the agreement granted Dr. Romet-Lemonne the right to receive a restricted stock grant of up to 25,671 shares. The restricted stock grant was subject to the following terms:
| | |
| • | the restricted stock vested as to 100% of the underlying shares on the date 42 months after the effective date of the employment agreement; |
|
| • | the restricted stock was subject to accelerated vesting upon the closing of one or more transactions providing a specified level of financing to us, the timely filing of a marketing approval application with the appropriate agency with respect to L-MTP-PE, the regulatory approval in the United States or Europe of L-MTP-PE and the closing of a transaction providing a specified level of funding to our infectious disease business; and |
|
| • | shares subject to the restricted stock grant that become vested would be issued to Dr. Romet-Lemonne on the earlier of (i) Dr. Romet-Lemonne’s termination, or (ii) 48 months from the effective date of the agreement. |
The agreement also provided for the grant of an option to purchase up to 77,757 shares of our common stock. The option grant vested over a four-year period with 25% of the underlying shares vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date and the balance vesting ratably on a daily basis thereafter, subject to Dr. Romet-Lemonne’s continuous employment with us through the applicable vesting date.
The agreement provided for continued exercisability of outstanding options to purchase ordinary shares of IDM Pharma S.A. granted to Dr. Romet-Lemonne prior to the effective date of the agreement which were replaced with substitute options to purchase our common stock in connection with the Combination, to the extent the current market price of the shares underlying the options was less than the exercise price of the options on the effective date of the agreement, generally until the later of (i) three months after employee’s employment termination, or (ii) December 31, 2008.
41
In case of termination of Dr. Romet-Lemonne’s employment due to death or disability, he would be entitled to full acceleration of vesting and exercisability of any outstanding options granted before the effective date of the agreement. In the event that we terminated his employment without cause (as “cause” is defined in the employment agreement), or Dr. Romet-Lemonne terminated his employment with good reason (as “good reason” is defined in the employment agreement), Dr. Romet-Lemonne would be entitled to, subject to the execution by him of an effective waiver and release of claims:
| | |
| • | severance payments, consisting of his base salary in effect at the time of termination, paid for a period of 24 months (or, at his option, payment in a lump sum of such amount), in the case of termination without cause, and, in the case of termination by Dr. Romet-Lemonne with good reason, such severance shall be paid from the date of termination until the earlier of 12 months or until the date he began full time employment with another entity; |
|
| • | reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums until the earlier of 12 months in the case of termination with good reason, 24 months in the case of termination without cause, or until the date he began full time employment with another entity, up to the maximum period permitted under COBRA |
|
| • | full acceleration, as of the date of termination, of vesting and exercisability of any outstanding options granted before the effective date of the agreement; and |
|
| • | full acceleration of vesting and exercisability of any unvested restricted stock or options granted pursuant to the agreement. |
On July 16, 2007, we entered into a first amendment to the employment agreement with Dr. Romet-Lemonne in connection with his termination of service with the Company. Pursuant to the amendment, we agreed to pay Dr. Romet-Lemonne severance payments for a period of 24 months and reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums for up to 24 months. In addition, we agreed that Dr. Romet-Lemonne’s outstanding, unvested stock options and stock awards shall be fully vested and immediately exercisable as of the date of the amendment.
42
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year – End.
The following table shows for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, certain information regarding outstanding equity awards at fiscal year end for the Named Executive Officers.
Outstanding Equity Awards At December 31, 2007
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Equity
| | | Equity
| |
| | | | | | | | Equity
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Incentive
| | | Incentive
| |
| | | | | | | | Incentive
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Plan
| | | Plan Awards:
| |
| | | | | | | | Plan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Awards:
| | | Market or
| |
| | | | | | | | Awards:
| | | | | | | | | | | | Market
| | | Number of
| | | Payout Value
| |
| | | | | | | | Number of
| | | | | | | | | | | | Value of
| | | Unearned
| | | of Unearned
| |
| | Number of
| | | Number of
| | | Securities
| | | | | | | | | Number of
| | | Shares or
| | | Shares, Units
| | | Shares, Units
| |
| | Securities
| | | Securities
| | | Underlying
| | | | | | | | | Shares or
| | | Units of
| | | or Other
| | | or Other
| |
| | Underlying
| | | Underlying
| | | Unexercised
| | | Option
| | | | | | Units of
| | | Stock That
| | | Rights That
| | | Rights That
| |
| | Unexercised
| | | Unexercised
| | | Unearned
| | | Exercise
| | | Option
| | | Stock That
| | | Have Not
| | | Have Not
| | | Have Not
| |
| | Options (#)
| | | Options (#)
| | | Options
| | | Price
| | | Expiration
| | | Have Not
| | | Vested
| | | Vested
| | | Vested
| |
Name
| | Exercisable
| | | Unexercisable
| | | (#)
| | | ($)
| | | Date
| | | Vested
| | | ($) (1)
| | | (#)
| | | (#)
| |
(a) | | (b) | | | (c) | | | (d) | | | (e) | | | (f) | | | (g) | | | (h) | | | (i) | | | (j) | |
|
Mr. Timothy P. Walbert | | | 21,729 | | | | 122,574 | | | | | | | | 3.18 | | | | 5/25/17 | | | | 80,000 | | | | 63,200 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 7,625 | | | | 48,072 | | | | | | | | 3.18 | | | | 6/14/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mr. Robert J. De Vaere | | | 14,650 | | | | 73,432 | | | | | | | | 8.02 | | | | 5/1/17 | | | | 40,000 | | | | 31,600 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,982 | | | | 9,936 | | | | | | | | 8.02 | | | | 6/12/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dr. Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne | | | 68,647 | (2) | | | 0 | | | | | | | | 25.46 | | | | 3/5/12 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 16,165 | (2) | | | 0 | | | | | | | | 29.47 | | | | 12/10/13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 77,757 | | | | 0 | | | | | | | | 6.99 | | | | 8/15/15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dr. Jeffrey Sherman | | | 8,333 | | | | 91,667 | | | | | | | | 1.64 | | | | 8/28/17 | | | | 20,000 | | | | 15,800 | | | | | | | | | |
Mr. Timothy C. Melkus | | | 0 | | | | 62,500 | | | | | | | | 2.59 | | | | 7/15/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mr. Herve Duchesne de Lamotte | | | 10,776 | (3) | | | 0 | | | | | | | | 12.04 | | | | 12/10/09 | | | | 4,664 | | | | 3,685 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 53,398 | (3) | | | 0 | | | | | | | | 25.04 | | | | 3/6/12 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 8,083 | (3) | | | 0 | | | | | | | | 28.99 | | | | 12/11/13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 16,528 | | | | 11,743 | | | | | | | | 5.25 | | | | 8/28/15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 12,697 | | | | 12,303 | | | | | | | | 3.36 | | | | 12/18/15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,608 | | | | 7,392 | | | | | | | | 3.05 | | | | 12/14/16 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 9,103 | | | | 40,897 | | | | | | | | 7.18 | | | | 4/8/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dr. Bonnie Mills | | | 8,082 | | | | 0 | | | | | | | | 25.46 | | | | 9/17/12 | | | | 3,572 | | | | 2,822 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 18,859 | | | | 0 | | | | | | | | 29.47 | | | | 8/28/15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 12,697 | | | | 12,303 | | | | | | | | 3.36 | | | | 12/18/15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 12,527 | | | | 8,901 | | | | | | | | 5.25 | | | | 8/28/15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 9,779 | | | | 27,721 | | | | | | | | 3.05 | | | | 12/14/16 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 9,103 | | | | 40,897 | | | | | | | | 7.18 | | | | 4/7/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dr. Sylvie Gregoire(4) | | | 1,667 | (5) | | | 1,190 | | | | | | | | 6.99 | | | | 8/15/15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 9,643 | (5) | | | 7,500 | | | | | | | | 5.29 | | | | 9/14/15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 5,000 | (5) | | | 0 | | | | | | | | 3.97 | | | | 6/13/16 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 250,000 | | | | 0 | | | | | | | | 2.75 | | | | 8/9/16 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 25,000 | | | | 0 | | | | | | | | 7.18 | | | | 4/8/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 684 | (5) | | | 4,316 | | | | | | | | 3.58 | | | | 6/13/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Based on $0.79 per share, using the closing price of IDM Pharma common stock on December 31, 2007, the last trading day of the year. |
|
(2) | | These options were granted in relation with the closing of the Combination in substitution of IDM Pharma S.A. options granted prior to the Combination. The corresponding IDM Pharma S.A. options were cancelled. |
|
(3) | | These options represent IDM Pharma S.A. shares. Upon exercise, the IDM Pharma S.A. shares are immediately exchangeable for IDM Pharma shares. The number of shares disclosed represents the number of IDM Pharma common stock for which the IDM Pharma S.A. shares subject to this option are exchangeable. |
|
(4) | | These amounts represent all equity awards held by Dr. Grégoire, including director awards that are also reflected on the table entitled “Director Compensation for Fiscal 2007” above. |
|
(5) | | This amount reflects a stock option grant to Dr. Grégoire for her services as a director. |
43
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table shows for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, certain information regarding option exercises and stock vested during the last fiscal year with respect to the Named Executive Officers:
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2007
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Option Awards | | | Stock Awards | |
| | Number of
| | | | | | Number of
| | | | |
| | Shares
| | | | | | Shares
| | | | |
| | Acquired
| | | Value Realized
| | | Acquired
| | | Value Realized
| |
| | on Exercises
| | | on Exercises
| | | on Vesting
| | | on Vesting
| |
Name | | (#) | | | ($) | | | (#) | | | ($)(1) | |
|
Mr. Timothy P. Walbert | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mr. Robert J. De Vaere | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dr. Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne | | | | �� | | | | | | | 15,403 | (2) | | | 47,441 | |
Dr. Jefferey W. Sherman | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mr. Timothy C. Melkus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mr. Hervé Duchesne de Lamotte | | | | | | | | | | | 2,332 | (3) | | | 6,716 | |
Dr. Bonnie Mills | | | | | | | | | | | 1,786 | (4) | | | 5,144 | |
Dr. Sylvie Gregoire | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Represents the number of shares vested times the market value of the underlying shares on the vesting date. |
|
(2) | | Receipt of these shares was deferred until January 16, 2008, the earlier of August 16, 2009 or 6 months following Dr. Romet-Lemonne’s resignation from the Board on July 16, 2007. |
|
(3) | | Receipt of these shares is deferred until the earlier of August 29, 2009 and Dr. Mills’ separation from service to the Company. |
|
(4) | | Receipt of these shares is deferred until the earlier of August 29, 2009 and Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte’s separation from service to the Company. |
Pension Benefits
None of our Named Executive Officers participates in or have account balances in qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans sponsored by us. The Compensation Committee may elect to adopt qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans in the future if the Compensation Committee determines that doing so is in our best interests.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The following table shows for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007, certain information regarding non-qualified deferred compensation benefits for the Named Executive Officers.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 2007
| | | | | | | | |
| | Aggregate Earnings
| | | Aggregate Balance
| |
| | in Last FY
| | | at Last FYE
| |
Name | | ($) | | | ($)(1) | |
|
Mr. Timothy P. Walbert | | | — | | | | — | |
Mr. Robert J. De Vaere | | | — | | | | — | |
Dr. Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne | | | (35,272 | )(2) | | | 20,280 | |
Dr. Jefferey W. Sherman | | | — | | | | — | |
Mr. Timothy C. Melkus | | | — | | | | — | |
Mr. Hervé Duchesne de Lamotte | | | (4,847 | )(2) | | | 3,685 | |
Dr. Bonnie Mills | | | (1,107 | )(2) | | | 2,821 | |
Dr. Sylvie Grégoire | | | — | | | | — | |
| | |
(1) | | Amount represents the market value of vested but unreleased shares multiplied by the closing price for the Company’s Common Stock of $0.79 on December 31, 2007, the last trading day of the year. |
|
(2) | | The amount shown represents the loss in share value from the share vesting date to December 31, 2007, for shares vested in 2007 and deferred past 2007. |
44
Potential Payments Upon Termination orChange-in-Control
The summary below sets forth potential payments payable to certain of our current Named Executive Officers upon termination of employment or a change in control of the Company, assuming the triggering event has taken place on the last business day of the Company’s prior fiscal year, December 31, 2007, and that the Company’s stock price is $0.79 per share, the closing market price on that date. The information provided regarding potential payments to be made includes the value of restricted share grants approved by our Board in January and April 2008. The Compensation Committee may in its discretion revise, amend or add to these benefits in the future if it deems doing so advisable and in our best interests. Timothy P. Walbert, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Robert J. De Vaere, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Dr. Jeffrey W. Sherman, our Senior Vice President, Research and Development and Chief Medial Officer, Mr. Timothy C. Melkus, our Senior Vice President, Business Development and Operations, Mr. Hervé Duchesne de Lamotte, our Vice President, Finance Europe, and Dr. Bonnie Mills, our Vice President, Clinical Operations, are the only Named Executive Officers who currently have any severanceand/or change of control arrangements.
Mr. Walbert
In the event that we terminate Mr. Walbert’s employment without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason, he will be entitled to, subject to the execution by him of an effective waiver and release of claims:
| | |
| • | severance payments, consisting of his base salary in effect at the time of termination, paid for a period of 12 months. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Walbert’s annual base salary was $390,000. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007 he would be entitled to receive $390,000, less standard deductions and withholdings, to be paid in a lump sum promptly following termination; |
|
| • | reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums, for up to the shorter of (i) 12 months, or (ii) the date he begins full time employment with another entity. Currently, Mr. Walbert’s COBRA health insurance premiums are $1,163 per month, $1,048 being paid by us and $115 paid by him. He would therefore be entitled to receive a total of $12,576 assuming that the longest 12 month period applies; |
|
| • | in the event the termination is not in connection with a change in control, acceleration of vesting and exercisability of 40,000 restricted shares, and acceleration of vesting and exercisability of a total of 25% of Mr. Walbert’s outstanding stock options, or 50,000 stock option shares. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007, Mr. Walbert would be entitled to the acceleration of vesting of $31,600 related to restricted stock and $0 related to stock subject to outstanding unvested stock-options as of December 31, 2007, based on the spread between the $0.79 closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2007, and the exercise price of the stock-options; and |
|
| • | in the event the termination is in connection with a change in control, acceleration of vesting and exercisability of 313,000 restricted shares, and acceleration of vesting and exercisability of 100% of Mr. Walbert’s unvested, outstanding stock options, or 170,646 stock option shares. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007, Mr. Walbert would be entitled to the acceleration of vesting of $247,270 related to restricted stock and $0 related to stock subject to outstanding unvested stock-options as of December 31, 2007, based on the spread between the $0.79 closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2007, and the exercise price of the stock-options. |
Mr. De Vaere
In the event that we terminate Mr. De Vaere’s employment without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason, he will be entitled to, subject to the execution by him of an effective waiver and release of claims:
| | |
| • | severance payments, consisting of his base salary in effect at the time of termination, paid for a period of six months. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. De Vaere’s annual base salary was $300,000. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007 he would be entitled to receive $150,000, less standard deductions and withholdings, to be paid over a period of six months following termination; |
45
| | |
| • | reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums, for up to the shorter of (i) six months, or (ii) the date he begins full time employment with another entity. Currently, Mr. De Vaere’s COBRA health insurance premiums are $1,194 per month, $1,076 being paid by us and $118 paid by him. He would therefore be entitled to receive a total of $6,456 assuming that the longest six month period applies; |
|
| • | in the event the termination is not in connection with a change in control, acceleration of vesting and exercisability of 20,000 restricted shares. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007, Mr. De Vaere would be entitled to the acceleration of vesting of $15,800 related to restricted stock; and |
|
| • | in the event the termination is in connection with a change in control, acceleration of vesting and exercisability of 154,000 restricted shares, and acceleration of vesting and exercisability of 50% of Mr. De Vaere’s unvested, outstanding stock options, or 41,684 stock option shares. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007, Mr. De Vaere would be entitled to the acceleration of vesting of $121,660 related to restricted stock and $0 related to stock subject to outstanding unvested stock-options as of December 31, 2007, based on the spread between the $0.79 closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2007, and the exercise price of the stock-options. |
Dr. Sherman
In the event that we terminate Dr. Sherman’s employment without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason, he will be entitled to, subject to the execution by him of an effective waiver and release of claims:
| | |
| • | severance payments, consisting of his base salary in effect at the time of termination, paid for a period of six months. As of December 31, 2007, Dr. Sherman’s annual base salary was $300,000. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007 he would be entitled to receive $150,000, less standard deductions and withholdings, to be paid over a period of six months following termination; |
|
| • | reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums, for up to the shorter of (i) six months, or (ii) the date he begins full time employment with another entity. Currently, Dr. Sherman’s COBRA health insurance premiums are $1,163 per month, $1,048 being paid by us and $115 paid by him. He would therefore be entitled to receive a total of $6,456 assuming that the longest six month period applies; |
|
| • | in the event the termination is not in connection with a change in control, acceleration of vesting and exercisability of 20,000 restricted shares. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007, Dr. Sherman would be entitled to the acceleration of vesting of $15,800 related to restricted stock; and |
|
| • | in the event the termination is in connection with a change in control, acceleration of vesting and exercisability of 93,000 restricted shares, and acceleration of vesting and exercisability of 50% of Dr. Sherman’s unvested, outstanding stock options, or 50,000 stock option shares. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007, Dr. Sherman would be entitled to the acceleration of vesting of $73,470 related to restricted stock and $0 related to stock subject to outstanding unvested stock-options as of December 31, 2007, based on the spread between the $0.79 closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2007, and the exercise price of the stock-options. |
Mr. Melkus
In the event that we terminate Mr. Melkus’ employment without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason, he will be entitled to, subject to the execution by him of an effective waiver and release of claims:
| | |
| • | severance payments, consisting of his base salary in effect at the time of termination, paid for a period of six months. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Melkus’ annual base salary was $220,000. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007 he would be entitled to receive $110,000, less standard deductions and withholdings, to be paid over a period of six months following termination; and |
|
| • | reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums, for up to the shorter of (i) six months, or (ii) the date he begins full time employment with another entity. Currently, Mr. Melkus’ COBRA health insurance premiums are $389 per month, $350 being paid by us and $39 paid by him. He would therefore be entitled to receive a total of $2,100 assuming that the longest 6 month period applies; and |
46
| | |
| • | in the event the termination is in connection with a change in control, acceleration of vesting and exercisability of 68,000 restricted shares. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007, Mr. Melkus would be entitled to the acceleration of vesting of $53,720 related to restricted stock. |
Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte
Under Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte’s employment agreement, in case of termination of his employment, he will be entitled to full acceleration of vesting and exercisability of any unvested restricted stock or options granted pursuant to the Combination. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007, Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte would be entitled to the acceleration of the vesting of (i) 11,743 shares of common stock subject to outstanding unvested options granted pursuant to the agreement, as of December 31, 2007, with an aggregate value equal to $0 (based on the spread between the closing price $0.79 of our common stock on December 31, 2007, and the exercise price of the stock-options), and (ii) 9,328 shares of common stock subject to outstanding unvested restricted stock granted pursuant to the agreement, as of December 31, 2007, with an aggregate value equal to $7,369 (based on the closing price of $0.79 of our common stock on December 29, 2007).
In connection with the closing of our operations in France and the termination of all of our employees at that location, we have notified Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte that he will be terminated June 30, 2008. In connection with his termination, Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte will be entitled to:
| | |
| • | severance payment, consisting of his annual gross base salary in effect at the time of termination, paid in one lump sum payment. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte’s annual base salary was $286,625 (based on an annual salary stated in euros of €196,278 and converted into US Dollars using the euro to dollar exchange rate on December 31, 2007 (1.4603 dollars per euro, Federal Reserve Bank of New York noon buying rate)). Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007 he would be entitled to receive $286,625 in one lump sum payment; |
|
| • | conventional legal indemnity, consisting of a percentage of his annual salary, taking into account his age and seniority at the time of termination and calculated according to the French pharmaceutical industry conventional index. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007 he would be entitled to receive $128,981 in one lump sum payment (based on an indemnity stated in euros of €88,325 and converted into US Dollars using the exchange rate on December 31, 2007 (1.4603 dollar per euro, Federal Reserve Bank of New-York noon buying rate)); |
|
| • | additional legal indemnity resulting from negotiated settlement with all of the employees at the Company’s French subsidiary, consisting of a fixed amount plus a percentage of his annual salary, taking into account his age and seniority at the time of termination. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007 he would be entitled to receive $183,767 in one lump sum payment (based on an indemnity stated in euros of €125,842 and converted into US Dollars using the exchange rate on December 31, 2007 (1.4603 dollar per euro, Federal Reserve Bank of New-York noon buying rate)); |
|
| • | severance period indemnity resulting from negotiated settlement with all of the employees at the Company’s French subsidiary, consisting of 3 months of salary. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007 he would be entitled to receive $71,656 in one lump sum payment (based on an indemnity stated in euros of €49,069 and converted into US Dollars using the exchange rate on December 31, 2007 (1.4603 dollar per euro, Federal Reserve Bank of New-York noon buying rate)); and |
|
| • | benefit from the coverage provided by IDM Pharma S.A.’s complementary health and life insurance for 12 months. Currently, Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte’s complementary health and life insurance premiums are $607 per month (based on premiums stated in euros of €416 and converted into US Dollars using the exchange rate on December 31, 2007 (1.4603 dollar per euro, Federal Reserve Bank of New-York noon buying rate)). He would therefore be entitled to receive a total of $7,284. |
47
In the event that we terminate Mr. Duchesne de Lamotte’s employment at his initiative with specific reasons, he will be entitled to:
| | |
| • | severance payments, consisting of his annual gross base salary in effect at the time of termination, paid in one lump sum payment further to a change of control, or in monthly installments equal to his monthly gross base salary paid up to the shorter of (i) 12 months, (ii) the date he begins full time employment with another entity if there is no change of control. Assuming that the longest 12 month period applies, he would be entitled to receive $286,625 in one lump sum payment, or in equal monthly installments as the case may apply; and |
|
| • | benefit from the coverage provided by IDM Pharma S.A.’s complementary health insurance for up to the shorter of (i) 12 months, or (ii) the date he begins full time employment with another entity. He would therefore be entitled to receive a total of $2,477 if the 12 month period applies. |
Dr. Mills
Under Dr. Mills’ employment agreement, in case of termination of her employment due to death or disability, she will be entitled to full acceleration of vesting and exercisability of any outstanding options granted before the effective date of the agreement. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007, all of Dr. Mills’ pre-agreement options were vested and no further vesting would occur.
In the event that we terminate Dr. Mills’ employment without cause, she will be entitled to, subject to the execution by her of an effective waiver and release of claims:
| | |
| • | severance payments, consisting of her base salary in effect at the time of termination, paid for a period of 12 months. As of December 31, 2007, Dr. Mills’ annual base salary was $235,000. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007 she would be entitled to receive $235,000 either by monthly installments over a 12 month period or in one lump sum payment within 5 business days of the termination; |
|
| • | reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums, for up to the shorter of (i) 12 months, (ii) the date she begins full time employment with another entity, or (iii) the maximum period permitted under COBRA. Currently, Dr. Mills’ COBRA health insurance premiums are $874 per month, $787 being paid by us and $87 paid by her. Assuming that the longest 12 month period applies, she would be entitled to receive a total of $9,444; |
|
| • | full acceleration, as of the date of termination, of vesting and exercisability of any outstanding options granted before the effective date of the agreement. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007, all of Dr. Mills’ pre-agreement options were vested and no further vesting would occur; and |
|
| • | full acceleration of vesting and exercisability of any unvested restricted stock or options granted pursuant to the agreement. Assuming a termination effective December 31, 2007, Dr. Mills would be entitled to the acceleration of the vesting of (i) 8,901 shares of common stock subject to outstanding unvested options granted pursuant to the agreement, as of December 31, 2007 with an aggregate value equal to $0 (based on the spread between the closing price of $0.79 of our common stock on December 31, 2007, and the exercise price of the stock-options), and (ii) 3,572 shares of common stock subject to outstanding unvested restricted stock granted pursuant to the agreement, as of December 31, 2007 with an aggregate value equal to $2,822 (based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2007, of $0.79). |
In the event that Dr. Mills terminates her employment with good reason, she will be entitled to severance payments and reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums up to the shorter of (i) 12 months, or (ii) the date she begins full time employment with another entity. Assuming that the longest 12 month period applies, Dr. Mills would be entitled to receive the same amounts as described above, by monthly installments over that 12 month period.
If Dr. Mills terminates her employment with good reason, the amounts related to accelerated vesting of applicable unvested options and restricted stock would also be the same as those described above.
48
Dr. Romet-Lemonne
On July 16, 2007, we entered into a first amendment to the employment agreement with Dr. Romet-Lemonne in connection with his termination of service with the Company. Pursuant to the amendment, we agreed to pay Dr. Romet-Lemonne severance payments for a period of 24 months and reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums for up to 24 months. In addition, we agreed that Dr. Romet-Lemonne’s outstanding, unvested stock options and stock awards shall be fully vested and immediately exercisable as of the date of the amendment.
In connection with his resignation and execution of a waiver and release of claims, and the first amendment to the employment agreement, Dr. Romet-Lemonne will receive, (a) 24 months of severance totaling $770,000, (b) up to $25,131, reflecting reimbursement for a portion of COBRA health insurance premiums for a period of 24 months, and (c) acceleration of the vesting of (i) 113,117 shares of common stock subject to outstanding unvested options, which as of July 16, 2007, had an aggregate value equal to $0 (based on the spread between the closing price of our common stock on July 16, 2007, of $2.71 and the exercise price of the stock options), and (ii) 10,268 shares of common stock subject to outstanding unvested restricted stock granted pursuant to the agreement, as of July 16, 2007, with an aggregate value equal to $27,826 (based on the closing price of our common stock on July 16, 2007 of $2.71).
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
Related-Person Transactions policy and Procedures
For the fiscal year 2007, the Company adopted a written Related-Person Transactions Policy that sets forth the Company’s policies and procedures regarding the identification, review, consideration and approval or ratification of “related-persons transactions.” For purposes of our policy only, a “related-person transaction” is a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which the Company and any “related person” are participants involving an amount that exceeds $120,000. Transactions involving compensation for services provided to the Company as an employee, director or consultant by a related person are not covered by this policy. A related person is any executive officer, director, or more than 5% stockholder of the Company, including any of their immediate family members, and any entity owned or controlled by such persons.
Under the policy, where a transaction has been identified as a related-person transaction, management must present information regarding the proposed related-person transaction to the Audit Committee (or by such other committee of the board, including where Audit Committee approval would be inappropriate, to another independent body of the board) for consideration and approval or ratification. The presentation must include a description of, among other things, the material facts, the interests, direct and indirect, of the related persons, the benefits to the Company of the transaction and whether any alternative transactions were available. In considering related-person transactions, the Committee takes into account the relevant available facts and circumstances including, but not limited to (a) the risks, costs and benefits to the Company, (b) the impact on a director’s independence in the event the related person is a director, immediate family member of a director or an entity with which a director is affiliated, (c) the terms of the transaction, (d) the availability of other sources for comparable services or products and (e) the terms available to or from, as the case may be, unrelated third parties or to or from employees generally. In the event a director has an interest in the proposed transaction, the director must recuse himself or herself from the deliberations and approval. The policy requires that, in determining whether to approve, ratify or reject a related-person transaction, the Committee look at, in light of known circumstances, whether the transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, as the Committee determines in the good faith exercise of its discretion.
Certain Related-Person Transactions
Our bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and executive officers and may indemnify our other officers, employees and other agents to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. We are also empowered under our bylaws to enter into indemnification contracts with our directors and officers and to purchase insurance on
49
behalf of any person whom it is required or permitted to indemnify. Pursuant to this provision, we have entered into indemnity agreements with each of our directors and executive officers.
In addition, our certificate of incorporation provides that to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, our directors will not be liable for monetary damages for breach of the directors’ fiduciary duty of care to us and our stockholders. This provision in the certificate of incorporation does not eliminate the duty of care, and in appropriate circumstances equitable remedies such as an injunction or other forms of non-monetary relief would remain available under Delaware law. Each director will continue to be subject to liability for breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to us, for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional misconduct or knowing violations of law, for acts or omissions that the director believes to be contrary to our best interests or our stockholders, for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit, for acts or omissions involving a reckless disregard for the director’s duty to us or our stockholders when the director was aware or should have been aware of a risk of serious injury to us or our stockholders, for acts or omissions that constitute an unexcused pattern of inattention that amounts to an abdication of the director’s duty to us or our stockholders, for improper transactions between the director and us, and for improper distributions to stockholders and loans to directors and officers. This provision also does not affect a director’s responsibilities under any other laws, such as the federal securities laws or state or federal environmental laws.
We have entered into certain additional transactions with our directors and officers, as described under the captions “Compensation of Directors” and “Executive Compensation.”
In July 1999, IDM Pharma S.A. entered into an initial agreement with sanofi-aventis, which beneficially owned greater than five percent of our common stock as of February 28, 2008, as amended in November 2001, under which sanofi-aventis agreed to provide the Company with a non-exclusive license to intellectual property for interleukin-13, referred to as IL-13, a compound that contributes to the transformation of white blood cells into specialized immune cells called dendritic cells, including a right to sub-license with sanofi-aventis’ approval. In exchange, the Company issued shares and warrants to sanofi-aventis. In July 2001, the Company entered into another agreement with sanofi-aventis to cooperate in cellular immunotherapy research for the development and marketing of immunologic treatment for cancers. Under this agreement, sanofi-aventis has the right to select up to 20 Cell Drug development programs (individually an “option”) from the Company’s line of research and development activities. In December 2007, sanofi-aventis notified the Company of its decision to terminate its participation in the UVIDEM development program and the Company put on hold further development of the program. In the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recorded $14.2 million in revenues from sanofi-aventis for reimbursement of current expenses related to the development of UVIDEM.
On August 10, 2006, Sylvie Grégoire, Pharm. D., was appointed the Executive Chair of the Board of Directors and entered into a consulting agreement with the Company. Dr. Grégoire’s compensation under the terms of the agreement included both cash compensation of $10,000 per month and 600,000 nonstatutory stock options that could vest and become exercisable upon the achievement by the Company of defined milestone events by specified dates through June 30, 2007. The agreement terminated as of June 30, 2007, and Ms. Grégoire vested a total of 300,000 stock options with the balance terminating unvested.
On February 20, 2007, we entered into a unit purchase agreement with certain purchasers pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 4,566,995 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase up to 782,568 shares of common stock for a total of $12,896,142 (excluding any proceeds that might be received upon exercise of the warrants). The purchase price of each share of common stock sold in the financing was $2.82 and the purchase price for the warrants was $0.022 for each share of common stock underlying the warrants. The closing of the financing occurred on February 20, 2007. Alta Partners, with which Dr. Deleage and Dr. Penhoet, members of our board of directors, are both affiliated, and Palo Alto Healthcare Fund, whom, with their affiliates, beneficially owned greater than five percent of our common stock as of February 28, 2008, participated as investors in the financing. Alta Partners purchased a total of $3,000,000 of common stock and warrants in the transaction and Palo Alto Healthcare Fund purchased $8,895,000 of common stock and warrants.
We entered into a consulting arrangement with Dr. McKearn on May 1, 2007 to assist us with management and operational matters on an interim basis and the compensation we paid Dr. McKearn as a consultant meant that he was no longer an independent director. Dr. McKearn resigned from each of the Audit Committee and Compensation
50
Committee when he entered into the consulting arrangement with us, and the Board appointed Dr. Beck to be a member of the Audit Committee under applicable rules to replace Dr. McKearn on the Audit Committee, and appointed Mr. Grey to be a member of the Compensation Committee under applicable rules to replace Dr. McKearn on the Compensation Committee.
On June 20, 2007 we entered into a unit purchase agreement with certain purchasers pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 7,142,855 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 2,357,139 shares of common stock for a total of $24,999,998 (excluding any proceeds that might be received upon exercise of the warrants). The purchase price of each unit sold in the financing, where each unit included one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one third of one share of common stock was $3.50 per unit. The closing of the financing occurred on June 25, 2007. Palo Alto Healthcare Fund, whom, with their affiliates, beneficially owned greater than five percent of our common stock as of February 28, 2008, participated as investors in the financing. Palo Alto Healthcare Fund purchased a total of $4,508,000 of common stock and warrants in the transaction.
HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (e.g., brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.
This year, a number of brokers with account holders who are IDM Pharma stockholders will be “householding” our proxy materials. A single proxy statement will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be “householding” communications to your address, “householding” will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in “householding” and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement and annual report, please notify your broker. Direct your written request to Secretary, IDM Pharma, Inc., 9 Parker, Suite 100, Irvine, California 92618 or contact IDM Pharma’s Secretary at(949) 470-4751. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the proxy statement at their addresses and would like to request “householding” of their communications should contact their brokers.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Timothy P. Walbert
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 1, 2008
A copy of the Company’s Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 is available without charge upon written request to: Corporate Secretary, IDM Pharma, Inc., 9 Parker, Suite 100, Irvine, California 92618.
51
APPENDIX A
IDM PHARMA, INC.
2000 STOCK PLAN
Adopted: April 21, 2000
Approved by Stockholders: June 9, 2000
Amended by the Board: December 4, 2001
Amended by the Board: January 14, 2002
Amendment Approved by Stockholders: June 18, 2002
Amended by the Board: June 4, 2003
Amendment Approved by Stockholders: July 15, 2003
Amended by the Board: March 3, 2004
Amendment Approved by Stockholders: June 15, 2004
Amended by the Board: March 15, 2005
Amendment Approved by Stockholders: August 11, 2005
Amended by the Board: March 23, 2006
Amendment Approved by Stockholders: June 14, 2006
Amended by the Board: April 9, 2007
Amendment Approved by Stockholders: June 14, 2007
Amended by the Board: April 3, 2008
Termination Date: April 20, 2010
A-1
1. Purposes.
(a) Eligible Stock Award Recipients. The persons eligible to receive Stock Awards are the Employees, Directors and Consultants of the Company and its Affiliates.
(b) Available Stock Awards. The purpose of the Plan is to provide a means by which eligible recipients of Stock Awards may be given an opportunity to benefit from increases in value of the Common Stock through the granting of the following Stock Awards: (i) Incentive Stock Options, (ii) Nonstatutory Stock Options, (iii) stock bonuses and (iv) rights to acquire restricted stock.
(c) General Purpose. The Company, by means of the Plan, seeks to retain the services of the group of persons eligible to receive Stock Awards, to secure and retain the services of new members of this group and to provide incentives for such persons to exert maximum efforts for the success of the Company and its Affiliates.
2. Definitions.
(a) “Affiliate” means any parent corporation or subsidiary corporation of the Company, whether now or hereafter existing, as those terms are defined in Sections 424(e) and (f), respectively, of the Code.
(b) “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
(c) “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
(d) “Committee” means a committee of one or more members of the Board appointed by the Board in accordance with subsection 3(c).
(e) “Common Stock” means the common stock of the Company.
(f) “Company” means IDM Pharma, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
(g) “Consultant” means any person, including an advisor, (i) engaged by the Company or an Affiliate to render consulting or advisory services and who is compensated for such services or (ii) who is a member of the Board of Directors of an Affiliate. However, the term “Consultant” shall not include either Directors who are not compensated by the Company for their services as Directors or Directors who are merely paid a director’s fee by the Company for their services as Directors.
(h) “Continuous Service” means that the Participant’s service with the Company or an Affiliate, whether as an Employee, Director or Consultant, is not interrupted or terminated. The Participant’s Continuous Service shall not be deemed to have terminated merely because of a change in the capacity in which the Participant renders service to the Company or an Affiliate as an Employee, Consultant or Director or a change in the entity for which the Participant renders such service, provided that there is no interruption or termination of the Participant’s Continuous Service. For example, a change in status from an Employee of the Company to a Consultant of an Affiliate or a Director will not constitute an interruption of Continuous Service. To the extent permitted by law, the Board or the chief executive officer of the Company, in that party’s sole discretion, may determine whether Continuous Service shall be considered interrupted in the case of any leave of absence approved by that party, including sick leave, military leave or any other personal leave. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a leave of absence shall be treated as Continuous Service for purposes of vesting in a Stock Award only to such extent as may be provided in the Company’s leave of absence policy or in the written terms of the Participant’s leave of absence agreement, to the extent permitted by law.
(i) “Covered Employee” means the chief executive officer and the four (4) other highest compensated officers of the Company for whom total compensation is required to be reported to stockholders under the Exchange Act, as determined for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.
(j) “Director” means a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.
(k) “Disability” means the permanent and total disability of a person within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code.
A-2
(l) “Employee” means any person, including Officers and Directors, employed by the Company or an Affiliate. Mere service as a Director or payment of a director’s fee by the Company or an Affiliate shall not be sufficient to constitute “employment” by the Company or an Affiliate.
(m) “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(n) “Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of the Common Stock determined as follows:
(i) If the Common Stock is listed on any established stock exchange or traded on the Nasdaq National Market or the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock shall be the closing sales price for such stock (or the closing bid, if no sales were reported) as quoted on such exchange or market (or the exchange or market with the greatest volume of trading in the Common Stock) on the day of determination, as reported inThe Wall Street Journalor such other source as the Board deems reliable;provided,however, that if the day of determination is not a market trading day, then the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock shall be the closing sales price for such stock (or the closing bid, if no sales were reported) as quoted on such exchange or market (or the exchange or market with the greatest volume of trading in the Common Stock) on the last market trading day prior to the day of determination, as reported inThe Wall Street Journalor such other source as the Board deems reliable.
(ii) In the absence of such markets for the Common Stock, the Fair Market Value shall be determined in good faith by the Board.
(o) “Incentive Stock Option” means an Option intended to qualify as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
(p) “Non-Employee Director” means a Director who either (i) is not a current Employee or Officer of the Company or its parent or a subsidiary, does not receive compensation (directly or indirectly) from the Company or its parent or a subsidiary for services rendered as a consultant or in any capacity other than as a Director (except for an amount as to which disclosure would not be required under Item 404(a) ofRegulation S-K promulgated pursuant to the Securities Act(“Regulation S-K”)), does not possess an interest in any other transaction as to which disclosure would be required under Item 404(a) ofRegulation S-K and is not engaged in a business relationship as to which disclosure would be required under Item 404(b) ofRegulation S-K; or (ii) is otherwise considered a “non-employee director” for purposes ofRule 16b-3. In addition, for purposes of Section 8 only, “Non-Employee Director” also shall include any Director who is not an Employee of the Company or an Affiliate at the time an Option is granted to such Director.
(q) “Nonstatutory Stock Option” means an Option not intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option.
(r) “Officer” means a person who is an officer of the Company within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
(s) “Option” means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonstatutory Stock Option granted pursuant to the Plan.
(t) “Option Agreement” means a written agreement between the Company and an Optionholder evidencing the terms and conditions of an individual Option grant. Each Option Agreement shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
(u) “Optionholder” means a person to whom an Option is granted pursuant to the Plan or, if applicable, such other person who holds an outstanding Option.
(v) “Outside Director” means a Director who either (i) is not a current employee of the Company or an “affiliated corporation” (within the meaning of Treasury Regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) of the Code), is not a former employee of the Company or an “affiliated corporation” receiving compensation for prior services (other than benefits under a tax qualified pension plan), was not an officer of the Company or an “affiliated corporation” at any time and is not currently receiving direct or indirect remuneration from the Company or an “affiliated corporation” for services in any capacity other than as a Director or (ii) is otherwise considered an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.
A-3
(w) “Participant” means a person to whom a Stock Award is granted pursuant to the Plan or, if applicable, such other person who holds an outstanding Stock Award.
(x) “Plan” means this IDM Pharma, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan.
(y) “Rule 16b-3” meansRule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act or any successor toRule 16b-3, as in effect from time to time.
(z) “Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
(aa) “Stock Award” means any right granted under the Plan, including an Option, a stock bonus and a right to acquire restricted stock.
(bb) “Stock Award Agreement” means a written agreement between the Company and a holder of a Stock Award evidencing the terms and conditions of an individual Stock Award grant. Each Stock Award Agreement shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
(cc) “Ten Percent Stockholder” means a person who owns (or is deemed to own pursuant to Section 424(d) of the Code) stock possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or of any of its Affiliates.
3. Administration.
(a) Administration by Board. The Board shall administer the Plan unless and until the Board delegates administration to a Committee, as provided in subsection 3(c). Any interpretation of the Plan by the Board and any decision by the Board under the Plan shall be final and binding on all persons.
(b) Powers of Board. The Board shall have the power, subject to, and within the limitations of, the express provisions of the Plan:
(i) To determine from time to time which of the persons eligible under the Plan shall be granted Stock Awards; when and how each Stock Award shall be granted; what type or combination of types of Stock Award shall be granted; the provisions of each Stock Award granted (which need not be identical), including the time or times when a person shall be permitted to receive Common Stock pursuant to a Stock Award; and the number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which a Stock Award shall be granted to each such person.
(ii) To construe and interpret the Plan and Stock Awards granted under it, and to establish, amend and revoke rules and regulations for its administration. The Board, in the exercise of this power, may correct any defect, omission or inconsistency in the Plan or in any Stock Award Agreement, in a manner and to the extent it shall deem necessary or expedient to make the Plan fully effective.
(iii) To amend the Plan or a Stock Award as provided in Section 13.
(iv) To terminate or suspend the Plan as provided in Section 14.
(v) Generally, to exercise such powers and to perform such acts as the Board deems necessary or expedient to promote the best interests of the Company which are not in conflict with the provisions of the Plan.
(vi) To adopt such procedures and sub-plans as are necessary or appropriate to permit participation in the Plan by Employees and Consultants who are foreign nationals or employed or providing services outside the United States.
(c) Delegation to Committee.
(i) General. The Board may delegate administration of the Plan to a Committee or Committees of one (1) or more members of the Board, and the term “Committee” shall apply to any person or persons to whom such authority has been delegated. If administration is delegated to a Committee, the Committee shall have, in connection with the administration of the Plan, the powers theretofore possessed by the Board, including the power to delegate to a subcommittee any of the administrative powers the Committee is authorized to exercise (and references in this Plan to the Board shall thereafter be to the Committee or subcommittee), subject,
A-4
however, to such resolutions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as may be adopted from time to time by the Board. The Board may abolish the Committee at any time and revest in the Board the administration of the Plan.
(ii) Committee Composition when Common Stock is Publicly Traded. At times when the Common Stock is publicly traded, in the discretion of the Board, a Committee may consist solely of two or more Outside Directors, in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code,and/or solely of two or more Non-Employee Directors, in accordance withRule 16b-3. Within the scope of such authority, the Board or the Committee may (1) delegate to a committee of one or more members of the Board who are not Outside Directors, the authority to grant Stock Awards to eligible persons who are either (a) not then Covered Employees and are not expected to be Covered Employees at the time of recognition of income resulting from such Stock Award or (b) not persons with respect to whom the Company wishes to comply with Section 162(m) of the Codeand/or (2) delegate to a committee of one or more members of the Board who are not Non-Employee Directors the authority to grant Stock Awards to eligible persons who are not then subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
(d) Delegation to an Officer. The Board may delegate to one or more Officers of the Company the authority to do one or both of the following (i) designate Officers and Employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to be recipients of Stock Awards and the terms thereof, and (ii) determine the number of shares of Common Stock to be subject to such Stock Awards granted to such Officers and Employees of the Company; provided, however, that the Board resolutions regarding such delegation shall specify the total number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to the Stock Awards granted by such Officer and that such Officer may not grant a Stock Award to himself or herself. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 3(d), the Board may not delegate to an Officer authority to determine the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock pursuant to Section 2(n)(ii) above.
4. Shares Subject to the Plan.
(a) Share Reserve. Subject to the provisions of Section 12 relating to adjustments upon changes in Common Stock, the Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Stock Awards shall not exceed in the aggregate three million two hundred twenty-eight thousand five hundred seventy-one (3,228,571) shares of Common Stock.
(b) Reversion of Shares to the Share Reserve. If any Stock Award shall for any reason expire or otherwise terminate, in whole or in part, without having been exercised in full, the shares of Common Stock not acquired under such Stock Award shall revert to and again become available for issuance under the Plan.
(c) Source of Shares. The shares of Common Stock subject to the Plan may be unissued shares or reacquired shares, bought on the market or otherwise.
5. Eligibility.
(a) Eligibility for Specific Stock Awards. Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to Employees. Stock Awards other than Incentive Stock Options may be granted to Employees, Directors and Consultants.
(b) Ten Percent Stockholders. A Ten Percent Stockholder shall not be granted an Incentive Stock Option unless the exercise price of such Option is at least one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock at the date of grant and the Option is not exercisable after the expiration of five (5) years from the date of grant.
(c) Section 162(m) Limitation. Subject to the provisions of Section 12 relating to adjustments upon changes in the shares of Common Stock, no Employee shall be eligible to be granted Options subject to Section 6 and restricted stock purchase rights subject to subsection 7(b) covering, in the aggregate, more than five hundred thousand (500,000) shares of the Common Stock during any calendar year.
(d) Consultants.
(i) A Consultant shall not be eligible for the grant of a Stock Award if, at the time of grant, aForm S-8 Registration Statement under the Securities Act(“Form S-8”) is not available to register either the offer or the sale of the Company’s securities to such Consultant because of the nature of the services that the Consultant is providing to the Company, or because the Consultant is not a natural person, or as otherwise provided by the
A-5
rules governing the use ofForm S-8, unless the Company determines both (i) that such grant (A) shall be registered in another manner under the Securities Act (e.g., on aForm S-3 Registration Statement) or (B) does not require registration under the Securities Act in order to comply with the requirements of the Securities Act, if applicable, and (ii) that such grant complies with the securities laws of all other relevant jurisdictions.
(ii) Form S-8 generally is available to consultants and advisors only if (i) they are natural persons; (ii) they provide bona fide services to the issuer, its parents, its majority-owned subsidiaries or majority-owned subsidiaries of the issuer’s parent; and (iii) the services are not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction, and do not promote or maintain, directly or indirectly, a market for the issuer’s securities.
6. Option Provisions.
Each Option shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as the Board shall deem appropriate. All Options shall be separately designated Incentive Stock Options or Nonstatutory Stock Options at the time of grant, and, if certificates are issued, a separate certificate or certificates will be issued for shares of Common Stock purchased on exercise of each type of Option. The provisions of separate Options need not be identical, but each Option shall include (through incorporation of provisions hereof by reference in the Option or otherwise) the substance of each of the following provisions:
(a) Term. Subject to the provisions of subsection 5(b) regarding Ten Percent Stockholders, no Incentive Stock Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date it was granted.
(b) Exercise Price of an Incentive Stock Option. Subject to the provisions of subsection 5(b) regarding Ten Percent Stockholders, the exercise price of each Incentive Stock Option shall be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock subject to the Option on the date the Option is granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Incentive Stock Option may be granted with an exercise price lower than that set forth in the preceding sentence if such Option is granted pursuant to an assumption or substitution for another option in a manner satisfying the provisions of Section 424(a) of the Code.
(c) Exercise Price of a Nonstatutory Stock Option. The exercise price of each Nonstatutory Stock Option shall be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock subject to the Option on the date the Option is granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Nonstatutory Stock Option may be granted with an exercise price lower than that set forth in the preceding sentence if such Option is granted pursuant to an assumption or substitution for another option in a manner satisfying the provisions of Section 424(a) of the Code. This Section 6(c) may not be amended without the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present and represented and entitled to vote at a duly convened meeting of stockholders of the Company.
(d) Consideration. The purchase price of Common Stock acquired pursuant to an Option shall be paid, to the extent permitted by applicable statutes and regulations, either (i) in cash at the time the Option is exercised or (ii) at the discretion of the Board (such Board discretion may be exercised either at the time of the grant of the Option or at any time following the grant of the Option to permit the following payment alternatives) (1) by delivery to the Company of other Common Stock, (2) according to a deferred payment or other similar arrangement with the Optionholder or (3) in any other form of legal consideration that may be acceptable to the Board; provided, however, that at any time that the Company is incorporated in Delaware, payment of the Common Stock’s “par value,” as defined in the Delaware General Corporation Law, shall not be made by deferred payment.
In the case of any deferred payment arrangement, interest shall compound at least annually and shall be charged at the minimum rate of interest necessary to avoid (i) the imputation of interest income to the Company and compensation income to the Optionholder under any applicable provisions of the Code, and (ii) adverse financial accounting treatment of the Option.
(e) Transferability of an Incentive Stock Option. An Incentive Stock Option shall not be transferable except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution and shall be exercisable during the lifetime of the Optionholder only by the Optionholder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the Optionholder may, by delivering written notice to the Company, in a form satisfactory to the Company, designate a third party who, in the event of the death of the
A-6
Optionholder, shall thereafter be entitled to exercise the Incentive Stock Option, and (ii) the Incentive Stock Option may be transferred pursuant to a domestic relations order.
(f) Transferability of a Nonstatutory Stock Option. A Nonstatutory Stock Option shall be transferable to the extent provided in the Option Agreement. If the Nonstatutory Stock Option does not provide for transferability, then the Nonstatutory Stock Option shall not be transferable except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution and shall be exercisable during the lifetime of the Optionholder only by the Optionholder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the Optionholder may, by delivering written notice to the Company, in a form satisfactory to the Company, designate a third party who, in the event of the death of the Optionholder, shall thereafter be entitled to exercise the Nonstatutory Stock Option, and (ii) the Nonstatutory Stock Option may be transferred pursuant to a domestic relations order.
(g) Vesting Generally. The total number of shares of Common Stock subject to an Option may, but need not, vest and therefore become exercisable in periodic installments that may, but need not, be equal. The Option may be subject to such other terms and conditions on the time or times when it may be exercised (which may be based on performance or other criteria) as the Board may deem appropriate. The vesting provisions of individual Options may vary. The provisions of this subsection 6(g) are subject to any Option provisions governing the minimum number of shares of Common Stock as to which an Option may be exercised.
(h) Termination of Continuous Service. In the event an Optionholder’s Continuous Service terminates (other than upon the Optionholder’s death or Disability), the Optionholder may exercise his or her Option (to the extent that the Optionholder was entitled to exercise such Option as of the date of termination) but only within such period of time ending on the earlier of (i) the date three (3) months following the termination of the Optionholder’s Continuous Service (or such longer or shorter period specified in the Option Agreement), or (ii) the expiration of the term of the Option as set forth in the Option Agreement. If, after termination, the Optionholder does not exercise his or her Option within the time specified, the Option shall terminate.
(i) Extension of Termination Date. An Optionholder’s Option Agreement may also provide that if the exercise of the Option following the termination of the Optionholder’s Continuous Service (other than upon the Optionholder’s death or Disability) would be prohibited at any time solely because the issuance of shares of Common Stock would violate the registration requirements under the Securities Act, then the Option shall terminate on the earlier of (i) the expiration of the term of the Option set forth in subsection 6(a) or (ii) the expiration of a period of three (3) months after the termination of the Optionholder’s Continuous Service during which the exercise of the Option would not be in violation of such registration requirements.
(j) Disability of Optionholder. In the event that an Optionholder’s Continuous Service terminates as a result of the Optionholder’s Disability, the Optionholder may exercise his or her Option (to the extent that the Optionholder was entitled to exercise such Option as of the date of termination), but only within such period of time ending on the earlier of (i) the date twelve (12) months following such termination (or such longer or shorter period specified in the Option Agreement) or (ii) the expiration of the term of the Option as set forth in the Option Agreement. If, after termination, the Optionholder does not exercise his or her Option within the time specified, the Option shall terminate.
(k) Death of Optionholder. In the event (i) an Optionholder’s Continuous Service terminates as a result of the Optionholder’s death or (ii) the Optionholder dies within the period (if any) specified in the Option Agreement after the termination of the Optionholder’s Continuous Service for a reason other than death, then the Option may be exercised (to the extent the Optionholder was entitled to exercise such Option as of the date of death) by the Optionholder’s estate, by a person who acquired the right to exercise the Option by bequest or inheritance or by a person designated to exercise the option upon the Optionholder’s death pursuant to subsection 6(e) or 6(f), but only within the period ending on the earlier of (1) the date eighteen (18) months following the date of death (or such longer or shorter period specified in the Option Agreement) or (2) the expiration of the term of such Option as set forth in the Option Agreement. If, after death, the Option is not exercised within the time specified, the Option shall terminate.
(l) Early Exercise. The Option may, but need not, include a provision whereby the Optionholder may elect at any time before the Optionholder’s Continuous Service terminates to exercise the Option as to any part or all of the
A-7
shares of Common Stock subject to the Option prior to the full vesting of the Option. Any unvested shares of Common Stock so purchased may be subject to a repurchase option in favor of the Company or to any other restriction the Board determines to be appropriate. The price paid for all shares of Common Stock so repurchased by the Company may be at the lesser of: (i) the Fair Market Value on the relevant date, or (ii) the Participant’s original cost for such shares. The Company shall not be required to exercise its repurchase option until at least six (6) months (or such longer or shorter period of time necessary to avoid a charge to earnings for financial accounting purposes) have elapsed following exercise of the Option unless the Board otherwise specifically provides in the Option.
(m) Re-Load Options. Without in any way limiting the authority of the Board to make or not to make grants of Options hereunder, the Board shall have the authority (but not an obligation) to include as part of any Option Agreement a provision entitling the Optionholder to a further Option (a “Re-Load Option”) in the event the Optionholder exercises the Option evidenced by the Option Agreement, in whole or in part, by surrendering other shares of Common Stock in accordance with this Plan and the terms and conditions of the Option Agreement. Any such Re-Load Option shall (i) except as provided in this subsection 6(m) below, be exercisable for a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the number of shares of Common Stock surrendered as part or all of the exercise price of such Option; (ii) have an expiration date which is the same as the expiration date of the Option the exercise of which gave rise to such Re-Load Option; and (iii) have an exercise price which is equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock subject to the Re-Load Option on the date of exercise of the original Option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Re-Load Option shall be subject to the same exercise price and term provisions heretofore described for Options under the Plan.
Any such Re-Load Option may be an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonstatutory Stock Option, as the Board may designate at the time of the grant of the original Option; provided, however, that the designation of any Re-Load Option as an Incentive Stock Option shall be subject to the one hundred thousand dollar ($100,000) annual limitation on the exercisability of Incentive Stock Options described in subsection 11(d) and in Section 422(d) of the Code. There shall be no Re-Load Options on a Re-Load Option. Any such Re-Load Option shall be subject to the availability of sufficient shares of Common Stock under subsection 4(a) and the “Section 162(m) Limitation” on the grants of Options under subsection 5(c) and shall be subject to such other terms and conditions as the Board may determine which are not inconsistent with the express provisions of the Plan regarding the terms of Options.
7. Provisions of Stock Awards other than Options.
(a) Stock Bonus Awards. Each stock bonus agreement shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as the Board shall deem appropriate. The terms and conditions of stock bonus agreements may change from time to time, and the terms and conditions of separate stock bonus agreements need not be identical, but each stock bonus agreement shall include (through incorporation of provisions hereof by reference in the agreement or otherwise) the substance of each of the following provisions:
(i) Consideration. A stock bonus may be awarded in consideration for past services actually rendered to the Company or an Affiliate for its benefit.
(ii) Vesting. Shares of Common Stock awarded under the stock bonus agreement may, but need not, be subject to a share repurchase option in favor of the Company in accordance with a vesting schedule to be determined by the Board.
(iii) Termination of Participant’s Continuous Service. In the event a Participant’s Continuous Service terminates, the Company may reacquire any or all of the shares of Common Stock held by the Participant which have not vested as of the date of termination under the terms of the stock bonus agreement.
(iv) Transferability. Rights to acquire shares under the stock bonus agreement shall be transferable by the Participant only upon such terms and conditions as are set forth in the stock bonus agreement, as the Board shall determine in its discretion, so long as Common Stock awarded under the stock bonus agreement remains subject to the terms of the stock bonus agreement.
(b) Restricted Stock Awards. Each restricted stock purchase agreement shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as the Board shall deem appropriate. The terms and conditions of restricted stock purchase agreements may change from time to time, and the terms and conditions of separate restricted stock
A-8
purchase agreements need not be identical, but each restricted stock purchase agreement shall include (through incorporation of provisions hereof by reference in the agreement or otherwise) the substance of each of the following provisions:
(i) Purchase Price. The purchase price under each restricted stock purchase agreement shall be such amount as the Board shall determine and designate in such restricted stock purchase agreement. The purchase price shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Common Stock’s Fair Market Value on the date such award is made or at the time the purchase is consummated; provided, however, that this Section 7(b)(i) may be amended to provide, or any restricted stock purchase agreement granted under the Plan may provide, that the purchase price shall not be less than eighty five percent (85%) of the Common Stock’s Fair Market Value on the date such award is made or at the time the purchase is consummated if such amendment or grant is approved by the holders of a majority of the shares present or represented and entitled to vote at a duly convened meeting of stockholders. This Section 7(b)(i) may not be amended without the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present and represented and entitled to vote at a duly convened meeting of stockholders of the Company.
(ii) Consideration. The purchase price of Common Stock acquired pursuant to the restricted stock purchase agreement shall be paid either: (i) in cash at the time of purchase; (ii) at the discretion of the Board, according to a deferred payment or other similar arrangement with the Participant; or (iii) in any other form of legal consideration that may be acceptable to the Board in its discretion; provided, however, that at any time that the Company is incorporated in Delaware, then payment of the Common Stock’s “par value,” as defined in the Delaware General Corporation Law, shall not be made by deferred payment. Additionally, in the case of any deferred payment arrangement, interest shall compound at least annually and shall be charged at the minimum rate of interest necessary to avoid (i) the imputation of interest income to the Company and compensation income to the Participant under any applicable provisions of the Code, and (ii) adverse financial accounting treatment of the restricted stock award.
(iii) Vesting. Shares of Common Stock acquired under the restricted stock purchase agreement may, but need not, be subject to a share repurchase option in favor of the Company in accordance with a vesting schedule to be determined by the Board.
(iv) Termination of Participant’s Continuous Service. In the event a Participant’s Continuous Service terminates, the Company may repurchase or otherwise reacquire any or all of the shares of Common Stock held by the Participant which have not vested as of the date of termination under the terms of the restricted stock purchase agreement. The price paid for all shares of Common Stock so repurchased or reacquired by the Company may be at the lesser of: (i) the Fair Market Value on the relevant date, or (ii) the Participant’s original cost for such shares. The Company shall not be required to exercise its repurchase or reacquisition option until at least six (6) months (or such longer or shorter period of time necessary to avoid a charge to earnings for financial accounting purposes) have elapsed following the Participant’s purchase of the shares of stock acquired pursuant to the restricted stock award unless otherwise determined by the Board or provided in the restricted stock purchase agreement.
(v) Transferability. Rights to acquire shares under the restricted stock purchase agreement shall be transferable by the Participant only upon such terms and conditions as are set forth in the restricted stock purchase agreement, as the Board shall determine in its discretion, so long as Common Stock awarded under the restricted stock purchase agreement remains subject to the terms of the restricted stock purchase agreement.
8. Non-Employee Directors.
(a) Non-Employee Directors shall be eligible to receive any form of Stock Award provided for by the Plan, other than Incentive Stock Options, and such Stock Awards shall be subject to all the terms of the Plan, including Sections 6 and 12, except as modified by this Section 8. Unless otherwise specifically provided in the applicable Option Agreement, Nonstatutory Options granted to Non-Employee Directors (“Non-Employee Director Options”) shall be subject to the provisions of this Section 8.
A-9
(b) The term of each Non-Employee Director Option shall commence on the date it is granted and expire on the date ten (10) years from the date of grant, unless sooner terminated due to the Non-Employee Director’s termination of Continuous Service. Non-Employee Director Options may be exercised following the Optionholder’s termination of Continuous Service, for whatever reason (to the extent such Optionholder was entitled to exercise such Option on the date of such termination), within the period of time ending on the earlier of (i) the date twelve (12) months following such termination or (ii) the expiration of the Option as set forth in the Option Agreement.
(c) The exercise price of each Nonstatutory Option granted to a Non-Employee Director Option shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock subject to the Option on the date of grant.
(d) In the event of a transaction or event described in any of subsections 12(b), 12(c), 12(d) or 12(e), then, with respect to Non-Employee Director Options held by Participants whose Continuous Service has not terminated, the vesting of such Non-Employee Director Options (and, if applicable, the time during which such Non-Employee Director Options may be exercised) shall be accelerated in full.
9. Covenants of the Company.
(a) Availability of Shares. During the terms of the Stock Awards, the Company shall keep available at all times the number of shares of Common Stock required to satisfy such Stock Awards.
(b) Securities Law Compliance. The Company shall seek to obtain from each regulatory commission or agency having jurisdiction over the Plan such authority as may be required to grant Stock Awards and to issue and sell shares of Common Stock upon exercise of the Stock Awards; provided, however, that this undertaking shall not require the Company to register under the Securities Act the Plan, any Stock Award or any Common Stock issued or issuable pursuant to any such Stock Award. If, after reasonable efforts, the Company is unable to obtain from any such regulatory commission or agency the authority which counsel for the Company deems necessary for the lawful issuance and sale of Common Stock under the Plan, the Company shall be relieved from any liability for failure to issue and sell Common Stock upon exercise of such Stock Awards unless and until such authority is obtained.
10. Use of Proceeds from Stock.
Proceeds from the sale of Common Stock pursuant to Stock Awards shall constitute general funds of the Company.
11. Miscellaneous.
(a) Acceleration of Exercisability and Vesting. The Board shall have the power to accelerate the time at which a Stock Award may first be exercised or the time during which a Stock Award or any part thereof will vest in accordance with the Plan, notwithstanding the provisions in the Stock Award stating the time at which it may first be exercised or the time during which it will vest.
(b) Stockholder Rights. No Participant shall be deemed to be the holder of, or to have any of the rights of a holder with respect to, any shares of Common Stock subject to such Stock Award unless and until such Participant has satisfied all requirements for exercise of the Stock Award pursuant to its terms.
(c) No Employment or other Service Rights. Nothing in the Plan or any instrument executed or Stock Award granted pursuant thereto shall confer upon any Participant any right to continue to serve the Company or an Affiliate in the capacity in effect at the time the Stock Award was granted or shall affect the right of the Company or an Affiliate to terminate (i) the employment of an Employee with or without notice and with or without cause, (ii) the service of a Consultant pursuant to the terms of such Consultant’s agreement with the Company or an Affiliate or (iii) the service of a Director pursuant to the Bylaws of the Company or an Affiliate, and any applicable provisions of the corporate law of the state in which the Company or the Affiliate is incorporated, as the case may be.
(d) Incentive Stock Option $100,000 Limitation. To the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined at the time of grant) of Common Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by any Optionholder during any calendar year (under all plans of the Company and its Affiliates)
A-10
exceeds one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), the Options or portions thereof which exceed such limit (according to the order in which they were granted) shall be treated as Nonstatutory Stock Options.
(e) Investment Assurances. The Company may require a Participant, as a condition of exercising or acquiring Common Stock under any Stock Award, (i) to give written assurances satisfactory to the Company as to the Participant’s knowledge and experience in financial and business mattersand/or to employ a purchaser representative reasonably satisfactory to the Company who is knowledgeable and experienced in financial and business matters and that he or she is capable of evaluating, alone or together with the purchaser representative, the merits and risks of exercising the Stock Award; and (ii) to give written assurances satisfactory to the Company stating that the Participant is acquiring Common Stock subject to the Stock Award for the Participant’s own account and not with any present intention of selling or otherwise distributing the Common Stock. The foregoing requirements, and any assurances given pursuant to such requirements, shall be inoperative if (1) the issuance of the shares of Common Stock upon the exercise or acquisition of Common Stock under the Stock Award has been registered under a then currently effective registration statement under the Securities Act or (2) as to any particular requirement, a determination is made by counsel for the Company that such requirement need not be met in the circumstances under the then applicable securities laws. The Company may, upon advice of counsel to the Company, place legends on stock certificates issued under the Plan as such counsel deems necessary or appropriate in order to comply with applicable securities laws, including, but not limited to, legends restricting the transfer of the Common Stock.
(f) Withholding Obligations. To the extent provided by the terms of a Stock Award Agreement, the Participant may satisfy any federal, state or local tax withholding obligation relating to the exercise or acquisition of Common Stock under a Stock Award by any of the following means (in addition to the Company’s right to withhold from any compensation paid to the Participant by the Company) or by a combination of such means: (i) tendering a cash payment; (ii) authorizing the Company to withhold shares of Common Stock from the shares of Common Stock otherwise issuable to the Participant as a result of the exercise or acquisition of Common Stock under the Stock Award; provided, however, that no shares are withheld with a value exceeding the minimum amount of tax required to withheld by law; or (iii) delivering to the Company owned and unencumbered shares of the Common Stock.
(g) Cancellation and Re-Grant of Options. The Board shall not have the authority, at any time, without obtaining the approval of a majority of the shares present or represented and entitled to vote at a duly convened meeting of stockholders, to (1) reduce the exercise price of any Options under the Plan that are either currently outstanding or will be granted in the future; (2) cancel any outstanding Options under the Plan and grant in substitution therefor new Options under the Plan at a lower exercise price (including entering into any “6 month and 1 day” cancellation and re-grant scheme), regardless of whether or not the cancelled Options revert to and again become available for issuance under the Plan; (3) replace Options having an exercise price higher than the then current Fair Market Value with rights to acquire restricted stockand/or stock bonus awards in an exchange, buy-back or other scheme; or (4) replace any outstanding Options under the Plan with new Options under the Plan having a lower exercise price or accelerated vesting schedule in an exchange, buy-back or other scheme. This Section 11(g) may not be amended without the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present or represented and entitled to vote at a duly convened meeting of the stockholders of the Company.
12. Adjustments upon Changes in Stock.
(a) Capitalization Adjustments. If any change is made in the Common Stock subject to the Plan, or subject to any Stock Award, without the receipt of consideration by the Company (through merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, reincorporation, stock dividend, dividend in property other than cash, stock split, liquidating dividend, combination of shares, exchange of shares, change in corporate structure or other transaction not involving the receipt of consideration by the Company), the Plan will be appropriately adjusted in the class(es) and maximum number of securities subject to the Plan pursuant to subsection 4(a) and the maximum number of securities subject to award to any person pursuant to subsection 5(c), and the outstanding Stock Awards will be appropriately adjusted in the class(es) and number of securities and price per share of Common Stock subject to such outstanding Stock Awards. The Board shall make such adjustments, and its determination shall be final,
A-11
binding and conclusive. (The conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be treated as a transaction “without receipt of consideration” by the Company.)
(b) Dissolution or Liquidation. In the event of a dissolution or liquidation of the Company, then, with respect to Stock Awards held by Participants whose Continuous Service has not terminated, the vesting of such Stock Awards (and, if applicable, the time during which such Stock Awards may be exercised) shall be accelerated in full, and the Stock Awards shall terminate if not exercised (if applicable) at or prior to such event, except to the extent that such Stock Awards are assumed or substituted by a surviving or acquiring corporation pursuant to subsection 12(c). With respect to any other Stock Awards outstanding under the Plan, such Stock Awards shall terminate if not exercised (if applicable) prior to such event.
(c) Asset Sale, Merger, Consolidation or Reverse Merger. In the event of (i) a sale, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, (ii) a merger or consolidation in which the Company is not the surviving corporation or (iii) a reverse merger in which the Company is the surviving corporation but the shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately preceding the merger are converted by virtue of the merger into other property, whether in the form of securities, cash or otherwise, then any surviving corporation or acquiring corporation may assume or continue any Stock Awards outstanding under the Plan or may substitute similar stock awards (including an award to acquire the same consideration paid to the stockholders in the transaction described in this subsection 12(c)) for those outstanding under the Plan. In the event any surviving corporation or acquiring corporation does not assume or continue such Stock Awards or substitute similar stock awards for those outstanding under the Plan, then, with respect to Stock Awards held by Participants whose Continuous Service has not terminated, the vesting of such Stock Awards (and, if applicable, the time during which such Stock Awards may be exercised) shall be accelerated in full, and the Stock Awards shall terminate if not exercised (if applicable) at or prior to such event. With respect to any other Stock Awards outstanding under the Plan, such Stock Awards shall terminate if not exercised (if applicable) prior to such event.
(d) Change in Control — Securities Acquisition. In the event of an acquisition by any person, entity or group within the meaning of Section 13(d) or 14(d) of the Exchange Act, or any comparable successor provisions (excluding any employee benefit plan, or related trust, sponsored or maintained by the Company or an Affiliate) of the beneficial ownership (within the meaning ofRule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, or comparable successor rule) of securities of the Company representing at least fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power entitled to vote in the election of Directors, then with respect to Stock Awards held by Participants whose Continuous Service has not terminated, the vesting of such Stock Awards (and, if applicable, the time during which such Stock Awards may be exercised) shall be accelerated in full; provided, however, that this subsection 12(d) shall not apply if the securities acquisition described in this subsection 12(d) is the result of or also constitutes a transaction described in subsection 12(c) above, in which case the provisions of subsection 12(c) shall apply.
(e) Change in Control — Change in Incumbent Board. In the event that the individuals who, as of the date of the adoption of this Plan, are members of the Board (the “Incumbent Board”), cease for any reason to constitute at least fifty percent (50%) of the Board, then with respect to Stock Awards held by persons whose Continuous Service has not terminated, the vesting of such Stock Awards (and, if applicable, the time during which such Stock Awards may be exercised) shall be accelerated in full; provided, however, that this subsection 12(e) shall not apply if the change in the Incumbent Board described in this subsection 12(e) occurs solely as a result ofand/or following a transaction described in subsection 12(c), in which case the provisions of subsection 12(c) shall apply. If the election, or nomination for election, by the Company’s stockholders of any new Director was approved by a vote of at least fifty percent (50%) of the Incumbent Board, such new Director shall be considered as a member of the Incumbent Board.
(f) Individual Agreements — Asset Sale, Merger, Consolidation, Reverse Merger or Change in Control. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of this Plan, the provisions of this Section 12 shall not apply to Stock Awards if otherwise provided in a written agreement between the Company or any Affiliate and the holder of the Stock Award. A Stock Award may be subject to additional acceleration of vesting and exercisability as may be provided in the Stock Award Agreement or as may be provided in any other written agreement between the Company or any Affiliate and the Participant.
A-12
13. Amendment of the Plan and Stock Awards.
(a) Amendment of Plan. The Board at any time, and from time to time, may amend the Plan. However, except as provided in Section 12 relating to adjustments upon changes in Common Stock, no amendment shall be effective unless approved by the stockholders of the Company to the extent stockholder approval is necessary pursuant to the terms of the Plan or necessary to satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Code,Rule 16b-3 or any Nasdaq or securities exchange listing requirements.
(b) Stockholder Approval. The Board may, in its sole discretion, submit any other amendment to the Plan for stockholder approval, including, but not limited to, amendments to the Plan intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations thereunder regarding the exclusion of performance-based compensation from the limit on corporate deductibility of compensation paid to certain executive officers.
(c) Contemplated Amendments. It is expressly contemplated that the Board may amend the Plan in any respect the Board deems necessary or advisable to provide eligible Employees with the maximum benefits provided or to be provided under the provisions of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder relating to Incentive Stock Optionsand/or to bring the Planand/or Incentive Stock Options granted under it into compliance therewith.
(d) No Impairment of Rights. Rights under any Stock Award granted before amendment of the Plan shall not be impaired by any amendment of the Plan unless (i) the Company requests the consent of the Participant and (ii) the Participant consents in writing.
(e) Amendment of Stock Awards. Subject to Section 6(c), 7(b)(i) and 11(g), the Board at any time, and from time to time, may amend the terms of any one or more Stock Awards; provided, however, that the rights under any Stock Award shall not be impaired by any such amendment unless (i) the Company requests the consent of the Participant and (ii) the Participant consents in writing. Notwithstanding the foregoing, subject to Section 6(c), 7(b)(i) and 11(g), any action by the Board to (A) reduce the exercise price of outstanding Options previously granted, (B) cancel outstanding Options and replace them with Options with a lower exercise price, or (C) effect an exchange of outstanding Options for new Options with a lower exercise price, shall be effective only if approved by the Company’s stockholders, unless taken pursuant to subsection 12(a), in connection a transaction described in subsection 12(c) or otherwise in a manner that would satisfy the provisions of Section 424(a) of the Code or regulations promulgated thereunder.
14. Termination or Suspension of the Plan.
(a) Plan Term. The Board may suspend or terminate the Plan at any time. Unless sooner terminated, the Plan shall terminate on the day before the tenth (10th) anniversary of the date the Plan is adopted by the Board or approved by the stockholders of the Company, whichever is earlier. No Stock Awards may be granted under the Plan while the Plan is suspended or after it is terminated.
(b) No Impairment of Rights. Suspension or termination of the Plan shall not impair rights and obligations under any Stock Award granted while the Plan is in effect, except with the written consent of the Participant.
15. Effective Date of Plan.
The Plan shall become effective on the date the Plan is approved by the stockholders, which approval shall be within twelve (12) months before or after the date the Plan is adopted by the Board.
16. Choice of Law.
The law of the State of California shall govern all questions concerning the construction, validity and interpretation of this Plan, without regard to such state’s conflict of laws rules.
A-13
IDM PHARMA, INC.
PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 25, 2008
The undersigned hereby appointsTimothy P. WalbertandRobert De Vaere, and each of them, as attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote all of the shares of stock of IDM Pharma, Inc. which the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of IDM Pharma, Inc. to be held at our offices at 9 Parker, Suite 100, Irvine, California 92618, on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time, and at any and all postponements, continuations and adjournments thereof, with all powers that the undersigned would possess if personally present, upon and in respect of the following matters and in accordance with the following instructions, with discretionary authority as to any and all other matters that may properly come before the meeting.
Unless a contrary direction is indicated, this Proxy will be voted for all nominees listed in Proposal 1 and for Proposals 2 and 3 as more specifically described in the Proxy Statement. If specific instructions are indicated, this Proxy will be voted in accordance therewith.
Voting Instructions:
Vote By Mail:Complete, sign, date and promptly return this proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.
Vote By Phone—1-800-776-9437:Call toll-free (in the United States), using any touch-tone telephone, to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on June 24, 2008. Have the proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the recorded instructions.
Vote By Internet—www.voteproxy.com:Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on June 24, 2008. Have the proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to create an electronic voting instruction form.
DO NOT RETURN THE PROXY CARD IF YOU ARE VOTING BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET
The Board of Directors recommends a vote for the nominees for director listed below.
| | |
Proposal 1: | | To elect six directors to serve for the ensuing year or until their successors are elected. |
o For the nominees listed below (except as marked to the contrary below).
| | |
Nominees: | | Robert Beck, M.D.; Michael G. Grey; John P. McKearn, Ph.D.; Edward E. Penhoet, Ph.D.; Gregory J. Tibbitts, Timothy P. Walbert |
o Withhold Authority.To withhold authority to vote for any nominee(s), write such nominee(s)’ name(s) below:
(Continued and to be signed on other side)
(Continued from other side)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote for Proposals 2 and 3. | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proposal 2: | | To approve an amendment to the IDM Pharma, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan to increase the number of shares of IDM Pharma’s Common Stock available for issuance under such plan from 2,828,571 to 3,228,571 shares. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | o | | For | | o | | Against | | o | | Abstain |
|
Proposal 3: | | To ratify the selection of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors ofErnst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, as the independent auditors of IDM Pharma for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | o | | For | | o | | Against | | o | | Abstain |
| | | | | | |
DATED | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | SIGNATURE(S) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Please sign exactly as your name appears hereon. If the stock is registered in the names of two or more persons, each should sign. Executors, administrators, trustees, guardians and attorneys-in-fact should add their titles. If signer is a corporation, please give full corporate name and have a duly authorized officer sign, stating title. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. |
Please vote, date and promptly return this proxy in the enclosed return envelope which is postage prepaid if mailed in the United States.