UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
Certified Shareholder Report of
Registered Management Investment Companies
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-5364
American High-Income Trust
(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in charter)
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (213) 486-9200
Date of fiscal year end: September 30
Date of reporting period: September 30, 2005
Julie F. Williams
Capital Research and Management Company
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
(name and address of agent for service)
Copies to:
Michael Glazer
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
515 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
(Counsel for the Registrant)
ITEM 1 - Reports to Stockholders
[logo - AMERICAN FUNDS (R)]
The right choice for the long term®
American High-Income Trust
More than just yield:
Building a portfolio for the long term
[photo - close up of alphabetical accordion file]
Annual report for the year ended September 30, 2005
American High-Income TrustSM seeks a high level of current income and, secondarily, capital appreciation through a diversified, carefully supervised portfolio consisting primarily of lower rated, higher risk corporate bonds.
This fund is one of the 29 American Funds. The organization ranks among the nation’s three largest mutual fund families. For more than seven decades, Capital Research and Management Company,SM the American Funds adviser, has invested with a long-term focus based on thorough research and attention to risk.
Table of contents | |
Letter to shareholders | 1 |
Results at a glance | 1 |
Chart: The value of a long-term perspective | 3 |
Feature — More than just yield: Building a portfolio for the long term | 4 |
Summary investment portfolio | 9 |
Financial statements | 14 |
Board of Trustees and officers | 31 |
The American Funds family | back cover |
Figures shown are past results for Class A shares and are not predictive of results in future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. Investing for short periods makes losses more likely. Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity. For the most current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com. Fund results shown, unless otherwise indicated, are at net asset value. If a sales charge (maximum 3.75%) had been deducted, the results would have been lower.
Here are the average annual total returns on a $1,000 investment with all distributions reinvested for periods ended September 30, 2005:
Class A shares | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years |
Reflecting 3.75% maximum sales charge | +3.49% | +6.92% | +7.30% |
The fund’s investment adviser waived 5% of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through March 31, 2005, and increased the waiver to 10% on April 1, 2005. Fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. Please see the Financial Highlights table on page 23 for details.
The fund’s 30-day yield for Class A shares as of October 31, 2005, calculated in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission formula, was 6.45%, which reflects a fee waiver (6.42% without the fee waiver). The fund’s distribution rate for Class A shares as of that date was 7.13%. Both reflect the 3.75% maximum sales charge. The SEC yield reflects the rate at which the fund is earning income on its current portfolio of securities while the distribution rate reflects the fund’s past dividends paid to shareholders. Accordingly, the fund’s SEC yield and distribution rate may differ.
Results for other share classes can be found on page 30. Please see the inside back cover for important information about other share classes.
The return of principal in bond funds is not guaranteed. Bond funds have the same interest rate, inflation and credit risks that are associated with the underlying bonds owned by the fund. High-yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing outside the United States is subject to additional risks, such as currency fluctuations, political instability, differing securities regulations and periods of illiquidity, which are detailed in the fund’s prospectus.
[photo - white coffee mug and pair of glasses]
Fellow shareholders:
Low inflation, strong corporate fundamentals and easy access to capital created a favorable climate for high-yield bonds in fiscal 2005. Yet, after two prior fiscal years of stronger-than-average results, the past 12-month period produced returns more in line with the fund’s historical average.
Shareholders who reinvested monthly dividends totaling 89 cents a share earned a total return of 7.5% for the 12 months ended September 30, 2005, which was in line with its income return of 7.5%. Those results surpassed the 6.9% gain for the Lipper High Current Yield Bond Funds Index, a benchmark of similar funds, and the 6.3% return for the Credit Suisse First Boston High Yield Bond Index, which attempts to mirror the high-yield debt markets. The Citigroup Broad Investment-Grade (BIG) Bond Index, which measures high-quality bond markets including Treasuries, posted
a 2.9% return. The latter two indexes are unmanaged and include no expenses.
Shareholders who elected to take their dividends in cash saw the value of their holdings increase 0.1% while earning an income return of 7.3%.
Industry trends influence results
Helping fund results this period were many issuers in the telecommunications sector, particularly wireless companies, which benefited from continued strong growth in revenues and subscribers, as well as declining debt levels.
On the negative side, the auto and airline sectors struggled with several high-profile credit downgrades and bankruptcy filings, as well as a slight upturn in defaults. In the auto industry, news of General Motors and Ford being downgraded to below investment grade in May rattled corporate bond markets. In addition, several auto parts suppliers have filed for bankruptcy protection due to rising steel costs and the inability to raise prices in the face of car companies’ continued pressure for more supplier price concessions.
[Begin Sidebar]
Results at a glance
Average annual total returns for periods ended September 30, 2005, with all distributions reinvested. The market indexes are unmanaged.
Returns | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years |
American High-Income Trust | +7.5% | +7.7% | +7.7% |
Credit Suisse First Boston | |||
High Yield Bond Index | +6.3 | +8.6 | +7.4 |
Citigroup Broad Investment- | |||
Grade (BIG) Bond Index | +2.9 | +6.7 | +6.6 |
Lipper High Current Yield | |||
Bond Funds Index | +6.9 | +5.0 | +5.5 |
For the 10 years ended September 30, 2005, American High-Income Trust ranked 9th in total return among the 99 high current yield funds in existence throughout the period, according to Lipper. For the five years ended September 30, 2005, it ranked 50th of 297, and for the 12 months ended September 30, 2005, the fund ranked 72nd of 424. Lipper rankings do not reflect the effect of sales charges.
[End Sidebar]
In the airline industry, high labor and fuel costs were factors in the bankruptcy-protection filings for Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines. Even with troubled industries, however, there can be solid investments for bondholders. In the airline industry, for example, we have found opportunities in bonds collateralized by high-quality aircraft.
[Begin Pull Quote]
Now that financial markets have regained their footing and corporate fundamentals are stronger, we recognize that the credit cycle could be nearing a turning point.
[End Pull Quote]
A turning point in the credit cycle
The past three years have been rewarding for bondholders, in large part due to an active deleveraging cycle in which a period of financial market stress forced many companies to focus on paying down debt. This helped them to improve their credit quality, which helped their bond prices to increase. In addition, default rates for high-yield bonds remained at historic lows for much of the period.
But now that financial markets have regained their footing and corporate fundamentals are stronger, we recognize that the credit cycle could be nearing a turning point. More companies are showing signs of adding debt and increasing leverage to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions and dividend payments. In addition, an increasing number of lower quality companies are adding to their bond market debt.
Rising interest rates are also putting pressure on corporate bond markets. The Federal Reserve Board increased the federal funds rate eight times during the period, from 1.75% to 3.75%. These were followed by another quarter-percentage point increase in November, after the close of the period. While these increases pushed short-term rates higher, long-term rates remained at relatively low levels, which has continued to provide attractive financing opportunities for many companies. Although it is likely that the Fed will continue to raise short-term rates, which could eventually put pressure on long-term rates, we believe our focus on finding companies with stable or improving credit can still produce attractive returns.
Maintaining a long-term perspective
Over the past three years, American High-Income Trust shareholders have enjoyed an average annual total return of 16.9%, surpassing the 14.7% return for the Lipper High Current Yield Bond Funds Index and the 15.5% return for the Credit Suisse First Boston High Yield Bond Index. That’s almost double the fund’s average annual total return of 9.2% since the fund’s inception on February 19, 1988.
Of course, we cannot expect the fund to report such strong results indefinitely. As we begin the new fiscal year, we expect nominal yields to be lower and significant capital appreciation to become harder to achieve. During periods of low yields, many investors have a tendency to stretch for yield by taking greater risks. But we don’t believe this is the time to take greater risks. Rather, our focus is on producing solid long-term results by balancing attention to yield with a view to long-term value. (See our feature on page 4.) While we don’t expect total returns to be as high going forward, we believe they will continue to be attractive compared with other parts of the bond market.
As always, we appreciate your continued support.
Cordially,
/s/ Paul G. Haaga, Jr. | /s/ David C. Barclay |
Paul G. Haaga, Jr. | David C. Barclay |
Vice Chairman of the Board | President |
November 15, 2005
For current information about the fund, visit americanfunds.com.
Martin Fenton, an independent Trustee of the fund since 1989, has been elected non-executive chairman of the Board. Paul G. Haaga, Jr., the previous chairman, has been elected vice chairman. As independent Board chair, Mr. Fenton will chair Board meetings, including executive sessions of the independent Trustees, and will be responsible for Board agendas, but will not have other executive or management responsibilities with the fund. He will remain unaffiliated with Capital Research and Management Company, the fund’s investment adviser, and any of its affiliates.
The value of a long-term perspective
Here’s how a $10,000 investment in American High-Income Trust grew between February 19, 1988, when the fund began operations, and September 30, 2005, the end of its latest fiscal year. As you can see, that $10,000 grew to $45,421 with all distributions reinvested.
Fund figures reflect deduction of the maximum sales charge of 3.75% on the $10,000 investment.1 Thus the net amount invested was $9,625.2
[begin mountain chart]
Year ended September 30
Year Ended | American High-Income Trust | Credit Suisse First Boston High Yield Bond Index (3) | Lipper High Current Yield Bond Funds Index (4) | Citigroup Broad Investment-Grade (BIG) Bond Index (3) | Consumer Price Index (inflation) (5) | Original Investment | |||||||||||||
1988(6) | $ | 10,182 | $ | 10,447 | $ | 10,475 | $ | 10,222 | $ | 10,328 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
1989 | $ | 11,189 | $ | 11,026 | $ | 10,935 | $ | 11,367 | $ | 10,776 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
1990 | $ | 10,735 | $ | 10,047 | $ | 9,570 | $ | 12,237 | $ | 11,440 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
1991 | $ | 13,873 | $ | 13,757 | $ | 12,290 | $ | 14,198 | $ | 11,828 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
1992 | $ | 16,376 | $ | 16,573 | $ | 15,132 | $ | 15,999 | $ | 12,181 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
1993 | $ | 18,764 | $ | 19,172 | $ | 17,473 | $ | 17,627 | $ | 12,509 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
1994 | $ | 19,066 | $ | 19,831 | $ | 17,899 | $ | 17,063 | $ | 12,879 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
1995 | $ | 21,604 | $ | 22,619 | $ | 20,178 | $ | 19,461 | $ | 13,207 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
1996 | $ | 24,570 | $ | 25,054 | $ | 22,644 | $ | 20,423 | $ | 13,603 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
1997 | $ | 28,176 | $ | 28,994 | $ | 26,120 | $ | 22,406 | $ | 13,897 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
1998 | $ | 27,491 | $ | 28,842 | $ | 25,688 | $ | 24,975 | $ | 14,103 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
1999 | $ | 29,721 | $ | 29,980 | $ | 27,037 | $ | 24,908 | $ | 14,474 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
2000 | $ | 31,295 | $ | 30,555 | $ | 27,021 | $ | 26,632 | $ | 14,974 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
2001 | $ | 30,218 | $ | 29,050 | $ | 23,569 | $ | 30,110 | $ | 15,371 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
2002 | $ | 28,442 | $ | 29,877 | $ | 22,814 | $ | 32,632 | $ | 15,603 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
2003 | $ | 38,197 | $ | 38,257 | $ | 28,862 | $ | 34,423 | $ | 15,966 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
2004 | $ | 42,235 | $ | 43,352 | $ | 32,215 | $ | 35,738 | $ | 16,371 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||
2005 | $ | 45,421 | $ | 46,089 | $ | 34,422 | $ | 36,783 | $ | 17,138 | $ | 10,000 |
1 As outlined in the prospectus, the sales charge is reduced for accounts (and aggregated investments) of $100,000 or more and is eliminated for purchases of $1 million or more. There is no sales charge on dividends or capital gain distributions that are reinvested in additional shares.
2 The maximum initial sales charge was 4.75% prior to January 10, 2000.
3 The market indexes are unmanaged and do not reflect sales charges, commissions or expenses.
4 Calculated by Lipper. The index does not reflect sales charges.
5 Computed from data supplied by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
6 For the period February 19 through September 30, 1988.
Past results are not predictive of results in future periods. The results shown are before taxes on fund distributions and sale of fund shares.
[end mountain chart]
Average annual total returns based on a $1,000 investment (for periods ended September 30, 2005)*
1 year | 5 years | 10 years | |
Class A shares | +3.49% | +6.92% | +7.30% |
*Assumes reinvestment of all distributions and payment of the maximum 3.75% sales charge.
The fund’s investment adviser waived 5% of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through March 31, 2005, and increased the waiver to 10% on April 1, 2005. Fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. Please see the Financial Highlights table on page 23 for details.
More than just yield:
Building a portfolio for the long term
[photo - hand holding green file folder]
[photo - David Lee]
[Begin Photo Caption]
David Lee
[End Photo Caption]
[photo - Ellen Carr]
[Begin Photo Caption]
Ellen Carr
[End Photo Caption]
[photo - Richard Lewis]
[Begin Photo Caption]
Richard Lewis
[End Photo Caption]
Figures shown are past results for Class A shares and are not predictive of results in future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For the most current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com. Fund results shown, unless otherwise indicated, are at net asset value. If a sales charge (maximum 3.75%) had been deducted, the results would have been lower.
Most investors buy shares in a high-yield bond fund for the purpose of earning income. But in their desire to maximize that income, many make a critical mistake: They measure funds primarily by their yield, or the interest income a fund pays. What they may not realize is that a portfolio that focuses strictly on yield may deliver high income for a time, but maintaining that yield usually proves to be difficult.
“To sustain a yield over the long term, a fund has to own holdings that can make it through unanticipated credit cycles,” says David Barclay, president of American High-Income Trust. “From a top-down standpoint, the highest yielding bonds have high yields because the market thinks they have a higher risk of default. If they do default, investors not only lose that yield, but also their principal.”
Although American High-Income Trust’s primary goal is to produce a high level of current income for shareholders, bonds in the fund’s portfolio are never judged solely against current yield. Instead, the fund focuses on producing solid long-term results by balancing attention to yield with a view to long-term value. “We buy holdings on an issuer-by-issuer basis,” says David. “We first look for companies that can service their debt and then, from those companies, we search for those with the highest yield.”
A look at the fund’s long-term results helps to illustrate this point: Over the past 10 years ended September 30, 2005, the fund’s 12-month dividend yield has averaged about 9%, which is similar to that of the Lipper High Current Yield Funds Average; however, the fund’s average annual total return over the same 10-year period was 7.7%, exceeding the 5.8% return of the Lipper average.
We spoke with three of the fund’s analysts — David Lee, Ellen Carr and Richard Lewis — to discuss the various factors they take into consideration when building the portfolio, and how the fund’s investment approach helps to produce a high level of current income while limiting the risk to a shareholder’s principal over time.
[photo - David Lee]
[Begin Photo Caption]
David Lee
Los Angeles
[End Photo Caption]
[Begin Pull Quote]
“Investors should think of bonds as a loan to the company. The best loans are to those companies that can pay us back with a relative degree of certainty.”
[End Pull Quote]
When fixed-income analyst David Leeevaluates bonds for American High-Income Trust’s portfolio, the single most important question he asks himself is: Can this company pay back its debt as promised? “Investors should think of bonds as a loan to the company,” he says. “The best loans are to those companies that can pay us back with a relative degree of certainty.”
To answer that critical question, he looks at several factors, including whether the company’s business model is logical and sustainable, what the company’s cash flows are after all expenses, and whether the yield adequately compensates for the level of risk and volatility of cash flows.
Only after weeding out the cases he feels are more likely to fall victim to bankruptcy does David look for yield. “In my view, what makes or breaks a bond fund is avoiding bankruptcies,” he says. “Bond-holders do not participate in the upside like equity investors. No matter how good an investment, the return potential of a bond is limited by the fact that it will mature at par. With stocks, an investor can make up for a terrible investment with a spectacular one, but that’s much harder to do in the bond market.”
David prefers companies that are improving in a controlled manner, focusing on improving credit quality, not just earnings. Such was the case with Host Marriott, a real estate investment trust focused on the lodging market. After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, travel demand from business travelers and corporate meetings declined significantly due to both a weak economy and a general fear of travel. The poor outlook for room demand resulted in the property owner’s bonds being downgraded.
From late 2002 into early 2003, David started to accumulate Host Marriott bonds for American High-Income Trust’s portfolio, despite the fact that they were not among the higher yielding leisure bonds at the time. David’s optimistic view on Host Marriott was based on the fact that the company would be able to generate positive cash flow even in depressed market conditions and that there was considerable asset value inherent in hard-to-replace hotel assets that were located in urban markets. Furthermore, David felt that management’s commitment to protecting the company’s balance sheet in uncertain times was credible, as evidenced by its elimination of the common dividend and curtailment of capital expenditures.
“Even if the travel market remained poor,” he says, “the company still generated sufficient cash to service its debt obligations. Host Marriott also provided backup collateral value in its real estate assets.”
By late 2003, the economy began to improve, as did the travel market. “While an improvement in the sector was not required for my investment thesis on the bonds, it was a nice bonus,” David says. Since then, the company has continued to take a balanced approach to credit quality by issuing equity to fund the purchase of additional assets.
Although the initial yields at which David bought Host Marriott’s bonds were already attractive, an even higher return occurred as the company improved its credit quality and ratings. “Shareholders ultimately earned a total return in excess of the yield,” says David. The lesson: “If you focus solely on a bond’s yield, you can easily miss the price appreciation you get from the bonds if the company improves and the bonds are upgraded.”
[Begin Pull Quote]
“Every decision is risk-reward, not just reward. If you stretch for a higher yield, it’s easy to get carried away with the reward portion by ignoring the risks.”
[End Pull Quote]
[photo - Ellen Carr]
[Begin Photo Caption]
Ellen Carr
Los Angeles
[End Photo Caption]
The key to investing in the high-yield market, says retail analyst Ellen Carr, is discipline: “You have to be willing to wait out a frothy market and buy when things look their worst.”
That’s exactly what Ellen did when she began to add J.C. Penney’s bonds to the fund’s portfolio five years ago. For some time, the department store chain struggled with poor sales, weak merchandising and an inability to keep up with certain shifts in customer shopping habits. Then, in 2000, a new CEO was hired whose goal was to improve the company’s credit rating. But J.C. Penney already had substantial debt maturities looming, which raised fears in the corporate bond market that the company would face a liquidity crisis.
Although the situation looked dire, Ellen’s conviction in the underlying asset value of the company as well as subsequent conversations with her equity counterparts led her to invest in a significant amount of the retailer’s bonds for the fund’s portfolio, some at 50 cents on the dollar.
Ellen’s research gave her confidence in the new management’s ability to turn the company around. Returning the company to investment grade was critical, she believed, because of how retailers worked. Most retailers’ profits come in the fourth quarter during the busy holiday season. Stores must buy their inventory up front, which means there is generally a 60- to 90-day gap before selling merchandise. While an investment-grade company can easily obtain cheap financing to cover the gap, a high-yield company has to have either a huge cash balance or a revolving line of credit from a bank, which allows the amount loaned to be borrowed again once it has been repaid, but is a more costly form of financing.
During 2001, after the company realigned and its credit profile began to improve, its options for generating cash increased. As a result, Ellen continued to purchase J.C. Penney’s bonds over the next year-and-a-half, even as yields dropped to 8%. “Because that was lower than the average high-yield bond at that time,” she says, “we asked ourselves if an 8% yield was high enough for the risk.”
After much analysis, Ellen felt that the company’s upgrade potential as it continued to evolve back to investment grade would result in a solid total return for shareholders and offered good relative value for the risk. For the next two years, Ellen continued to add J.C. Penney bonds to the fund’s portfolio, which were declining in risk even as prices rose. “I spent enough time in J.C. Penney stores to understand the merchandising strategy,” she says. “The stores had begun stocking more fashionable clothes priced at a good value, and it was easier for customers to find what they wanted.”
Her evaluation proved correct. In mid-2004, about four-and-a-half years after her original investment, Ellen sold most of her J.C. Penney holdings, earning a total return that made the retailer one of the top five contributors to American High-Income Trust’s overall return for the period from January 2000 to June 2004. “Every decision is risk-reward, not just reward,” she says. “If you stretch for a higher yield, it’s easy to get carried away with the reward portion by ignoring the risks. In many cases, sacrificing yield to own a company with an improving credit profile is worth it.”
Ellen says more than half of her holdings in the fund’s portfolio are invested in companies like J.C. Penney that may be average or below-average in terms of yield, but have good management and lots of liquidity. Less than half of her holdings are invested in higher risk names that provide above-average yields. “If you focus only on the highest yielding companies,” says Ellen, “you would leave behind a lot of good investments.”
[photo - Richard Lewis]
[Begin Photo Caption]
Richard Lewis
New York
[End Photo Caption]
[Begin Pull Quote]
“Some investors [would have sold] the bonds as soon as they were yielding below the market average. But by holding onto them, our shareholders were able to make a good total return without taking on much risk.”
[End Pull Quote]
Richard Lewis doesn’t think of his job as a fixed-income analyst any differently than he would if he were an equity investor. “I just invest in different securities,” he says. “I still look at a company’s operations, its competitive position and growth opportunities going forward.”
He particularly loves to find the undiscovered bargain. “If a company’s valuation is extraordinarily cheap because the market has ignored it, that’s a company that piques my interest,” Richard says. But evaluating a company’s financials is just part of his analysis. Richard spends about 30% to 40% of his time on the road, visiting with managements and seeing firsthand how companies’ operations work.
Often, it’s a factor beyond the balance sheet that guides his decision of whether or not to invest. In the case of Premcor Refining, an independent petroleum refiner, the crucial factor was a change in management.
Traditionally, the company carried too much debt and tended to ride the fundamentals of the industry, which meant it would do well during certain business cycles and then do very poorly during others. But Richard took note when the company hired a new CEO, whose track record at a previous firm led Richard to believe he would concentrate on improving Premcor’s credit rating.
In April 2002, the new management took Premcor public, a goal the company had been trying to accomplish for some time. That’s when Richard recommended that the fund make a significant investment in the company’s bonds, which were trading at yields between 9% and 10%. “It was clear it would be a different company,” says Richard. “I was confident that following the IPO, the new management would clean up the company’s balance sheet and guide it to investment grade.”
Soon after, Premcor’s new management slowly began to purchase other refineries, using a combination of debt and equity to finance the acquisitions. For the first time, the company was able to reduce its financial leverage in a meaningful way. Richard continued to recommend the bonds as the company improved. “Instead of being at the whim of the market and riding the fundamentals of the industry,” says Richard, “Premcor was able to clean up its balance sheet and gradually climb its way to investment grade.”
As in equity analysis, understanding a company’s management team is critical when investing in bonds. “Modeling Premcor was part of the picture, but it didn’t tell you what drove the new CEO,” he says. “What drove him was creating value by making acquisitions. It was important to him that Premcor become an investment-grade company because that would make it easier for him to get the financing necessary to make these acquisitions. And that was good for bondholders.”
This year, Valero Energy, another independent petroleum refiner and marketer, acquired Premcor at a higher-than-expected valuation. That caused the price of Premcor’s bonds to increase and their yields to decline. As of September 30, 2005, yields of outstanding Premcor bonds hovered between 5.1% and 5.8%. Some high-yield investors would have sold then, and proceeded to look for the next higher yielding bond. But Richard saw value in holding onto the bonds. He figured that either Valero would tender for the bonds and pay them off at a premium, or spreads would tighten to Valero’s levels and the bonds’ prices would rise further. Either way, the fund’s shareholders would profit.
“The temptation of looking just for yield would have led some investors to sell the bonds as soon as they were yielding below the market average,” says Richard. “But by holding onto them, our shareholders were able to make a good total return without taking on much risk.”
Summary investment portfolio, September 30, 2005
The following summary investment portfolio is designed to streamline the report and help investors better focus on a fund’s principal holdings. For details on how to obtain a complete schedule of portfolio holdings, please see the inside back cover.
[begin pie chart}
U.S. corporate bonds & notes | 69.7% |
Non-U.S. corporate bonds & notes | 14.2 |
Non-U.S. government bonds & notes | 4.7 |
Convertible securities | 2.6 |
Preferred securities | 2.0 |
Common stocks & warrants | 1.1 |
Other | 0.6 |
U.S. government bonds & notes | 0.5 |
Cash & equivalents | 4.6 |
[end pie chart]
Principal | Market | Percent | ||||||||
amount | value | of net | ||||||||
Bonds & notes - 89.66% | (000 | ) | (000 | ) | assets | |||||
Corporate bonds & notes - 83.90% | ||||||||||
Consumer discretionary - 27.08% | ||||||||||
General Motors Acceptance Corp.: | ||||||||||
7.00% 2012 | $ | 42,644 | $ | 38,558 | ||||||
5.85%-8.00% 2007-2031 (1) | 130,231 | 119,240 | ||||||||
General Motors Corp.: | ||||||||||
7.25% 2013 | € 3,000 | 2,997 | ||||||||
7.20%-8.25% 2011-2023 | $ | 38,335 | 33,336 | 1.93 | % | |||||
CCH II, LLC and CCH II Capital Corp. 10.25% 2010 | 14,105 | 14,528 | ||||||||
Charter Communications Operating, LLC and Charter Communications Operating Capital Corp.: | ||||||||||
8.00% 2012 (2) | 39,950 | 40,449 | ||||||||
8.375% 2014 (2) | 22,800 | 23,028 | ||||||||
CCO Holdings, LLC and CCO Holdings Capital Corp. 8.75% 2013 | 24,625 | 24,440 | ||||||||
Charter Communications Holdings, LLC and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corp. 0%/11.75%-0%/13.50% 2011-2012 (3) | 14,375 | 10,743 | 1.13 | |||||||
CanWest Media Inc., Series B, 8.00% 2012 | 60,258 | 64,250 | .64 | |||||||
Cinemark USA, Inc. 9.00% 2013 | 56,718 | 58,845 | .58 | |||||||
Kabel Deutschland GmbH 10.625% 2014 (2) | 45,105 | 50,067 | .50 | |||||||
Young Broadcasting Inc. 10.00% 2011 | 52,060 | 49,457 | .49 | |||||||
Tenneco Automotive Inc. 8.625% 2014 | 47,250 | 47,841 | .48 | |||||||
Grupo Posadas, SA de CV 8.75% 2011 (2) | 44,095 | 47,402 | .47 | |||||||
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority 6.375% 2009 | 45,040 | 45,265 | .45 | |||||||
Telenet Group Holding NV 0%/11.50% 2014 (2) (3) | 47,145 | 38,777 | .39 | |||||||
Quebecor Media Inc. 11.125% 2011 | 33,328 | 36,577 | .36 | |||||||
Other securities | 1,978,739 | 19.66 | ||||||||
2,724,539 | 27.08 | |||||||||
Telecommunication services - 11.23% | ||||||||||
Qwest Services Corp.: | ||||||||||
13.50% 2010 | 46,785 | 53,803 | ||||||||
14.00% 2014 | 25,375 | 30,894 | ||||||||
Qwest Communications International Inc. 7.25% 2011 | 24,375 | 23,857 | ||||||||
Qwest Corp. 8.875% 2012 | 3,600 | 3,951 | ||||||||
Qwest Capital Funding, Inc. 7.00%-7.90% 2006-2031 | 63,845 | 62,502 | ||||||||
U S WEST Capital Funding, Inc. 6.375%-6.875% 2008-2028 | 18,834 | 16,184 | 1.90 | |||||||
American Cellular Corp., Series B, 10.00% 2011 | 57,575 | 63,045 | ||||||||
Dobson Communications Corp.: | ||||||||||
8.875% 2013 | 37,250 | 37,436 | ||||||||
8.10%-10.875% 2010-2012 (1) (2) | 30,825 | 31,323 | ||||||||
Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. 8.443%-9.875% 2011-2012 (1) | 24,375 | 26,578 | 1.57 | |||||||
US Unwired Inc., Series B, 10.00% 2012 | 17,150 | 19,808 | ||||||||
Nextel Communications, Inc.: | ||||||||||
6.875% 2013 | 14,500 | 15,405 | ||||||||
7.375% 2015 | 88,378 | 94,693 | 1.29 | |||||||
Triton PCS, Inc.: | ||||||||||
8.75% 2011 | 35,425 | 29,137 | ||||||||
9.375% 2011 | 49,810 | 41,093 | ||||||||
8.50% 2013 | 55,625 | 53,261 | 1.23 | |||||||
American Tower Corp.: | ||||||||||
7.125% 2012 | 62,860 | 66,317 | ||||||||
7.25%-7.50% 2011-2012 | 23,725 | 25,281 | .91 | |||||||
Cincinnati Bell Inc. 7.25% 2013 | 38,425 | 41,019 | .41 | |||||||
NTELOS Inc. 9.03% 2012 (1) | 40,250 | 40,049 | .40 | |||||||
SBA Communications Corp. 8.50% 2012 | 35,905 | 39,226 | .39 | |||||||
Centennial Communications Corp. and Centennial Cellular Operating Co. LLC 10.125% 2013 | 32,555 | 36,787 | .37 | |||||||
Other securities | 278,404 | 2.76 | ||||||||
1,130,053 | 11.23 | |||||||||
Materials - 10.71% | ||||||||||
Millennium America Inc. 9.25% 2008 | 30,825 | 33,291 | ||||||||
Lyondell Chemical Co. 9.50% 2008 | 10,000 | 10,525 | ||||||||
Equistar Chemicals, LP 10.125% 2008 | 15,650 | 16,902 | ||||||||
Equistar Chemicals, LP and Equistar Funding Corp.: | ||||||||||
8.75% 2009 | 10,265 | 10,727 | ||||||||
10.625% 2011 | 44,875 | 49,138 | 1.20 | |||||||
Abitibi-Consolidated Finance LP 7.875% 2009 | 14,500 | 14,464 | ||||||||
Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. 8.55% 2010 | 16,045 | 16,406 | ||||||||
Abitibi-Consolidated Co. of Canada 5.25%-8.375% 2008-2015 (1) | 75,890 | 73,628 | 1.04 | |||||||
JSG Holdings PLC 11.50% 2015 (4) | € 44,087 | 47,179 | .47 | |||||||
Gerdau Ameristeel Corp. and GUSAP Partners 10.375% 2011 | $ | 30,775 | 34,391 | .34 | ||||||
Other securities | 771,349 | 7.66 | ||||||||
1,078,000 | 10.71 | |||||||||
Industrials - 7.82% | ||||||||||
Dyncorp International LLC 9.50% 2013 (2) | 38,815 | 40,756 | .41 | |||||||
Horizon Lines, LLC and Horizon Lines Holding Corp. 9.00% 2012 | 36,745 | 39,547 | .39 | |||||||
Accuride Corp. 8.50% 2015 | 35,995 | 35,455 | .35 | |||||||
Jacuzzi Brands, Inc. 9.625% 2010 | 33,155 | 35,310 | .35 | |||||||
Other securities | 635,906 | 6.32 | ||||||||
786,974 | 7.82 | |||||||||
Utilities - 6.01% | ||||||||||
Edison Mission Energy: | ||||||||||
10.00% 2008 | 29,150 | 32,429 | ||||||||
7.73% 2009 | 43,250 | 45,845 | ||||||||
9.875% 2011 | 38,850 | 46,232 | ||||||||
Mission Energy Holding Co. 13.50% 2008 | 38,350 | 45,349 | ||||||||
Midwest Generation, LLC, Series B, 8.56% 2016 (5) | 23,985 | 26,398 | ||||||||
Homer City Funding LLC 8.734% 2026 (5) | 9,444 | 11,286 | ||||||||
Midwest Generation, LLC and Midwest Finance Corp. 8.75% 2034 | 19,250 | 21,536 | 2.28 | |||||||
AES Corp.: | ||||||||||
8.75% 2013 (2) | 43,985 | 48,384 | ||||||||
8.875%-9.50% 2009-2015 (2) | 60,501 | 66,479 | ||||||||
AES Gener SA 7.50% 2014 | 18,350 | 18,696 | ||||||||
AES Red Oak, LLC, Series B, 9.20% 2029 (5) | 7,000 | 8,015 | 1.41 | |||||||
Dynegy Holdings Inc. 10.125% 2013 (2) | 37,315 | 41,793 | .42 | |||||||
Other securities | 191,850 | 1.90 | ||||||||
604,292 | 6.01 | |||||||||
Consumer staples - 5.37% | ||||||||||
Burns Philp Capital Pty Ltd., Series B, 9.75% 2012 | 60,322 | 67,862 | ||||||||
Burns Philp Capital Pty Ltd. and Burns Philp Capital (U.S.) Inc., Series B, 9.50%-10.75% 2010-2011 | 34,575 | 38,646 | 1.06 | |||||||
Spectrum Brands, Inc. 7.375% 2015 | 40,645 | 36,784 | .37 | |||||||
Delhaize America, Inc. 8.125% 2011 | 33,645 | 36,633 | .36 | |||||||
Other securities | 360,795 | 3.58 | ||||||||
540,720 | 5.37 | |||||||||
Energy - 4.39% | ||||||||||
Port Arthur Finance Corp. 12.50% 2009 (5) | 1,386 | 1,587 | ||||||||
Premcor Refining Group Inc. 6.125%-9.50% 2010-2015 | 98,475 | 107,242 | 1.08 | |||||||
General Maritime Corp. 10.00% 2013 | 42,925 | 47,432 | .47 | |||||||
Petrozuata Finance, Inc., Series B, 8.22% 2017 (2) (5) | 39,405 | 37,829 | .38 | |||||||
Other securities | 247,237 | 2.46 | ||||||||
441,327 | 4.39 | |||||||||
Health care - 4.35% | ||||||||||
Quintiles Transnational Corp. 10.00% 2013 | 47,775 | 53,986 | .54 | |||||||
Tenet Healthcare Corp. 9.875% 2014 | 38,700 | 40,635 | .40 | |||||||
Warner Chilcott Corp. 8.75% 2015 (2) | 38,150 | 36,815 | .37 | |||||||
Other securities | 306,483 | 3.04 | ||||||||
437,919 | 4.35 | |||||||||
Information technology - 4.01% | ||||||||||
Sanmina-SCI Corp. 10.375% 2010 | 51,750 | 57,313 | .57 | |||||||
Electronic Data Systems Corp., Series B, 6.50% 2013 (1) | 41,040 | 42,104 | .42 | |||||||
Other securities | 304,216 | 3.02 | ||||||||
403,633 | 4.01 | |||||||||
Financials - 2.93% | 295,098 | 2.93 | ||||||||
Non-U.S. government bonds & notes - 4.65% | ||||||||||
Russian Federation 5.00%/7.50% 2030 (3) | 32,365 | 37,220 | .37 | |||||||
Argentina (Republic of) 6.501% 2033 (4) (6) | ARS 95,591 | 36,716 | .36 | |||||||
Other securities | 394,029 | 3.92 | ||||||||
467,965 | 4.65 | |||||||||
Other - 1.11% | 111,258 | 1.11 | ||||||||
Total bonds & notes (cost: $8,837,898,000) | 9,021,778 | 89.66 | ||||||||
Shares or | Market | Percent | ||||||||
principal | value | of net | ||||||||
Convertible securities - 2.63% | amount | (000 | ) | assets | ||||||
Consumer discretionary - 1.16% | ||||||||||
Amazon.com, Inc. 6.875% PEACS convertible subordinated notes 2010 | € 42,233,000 | 51,530 | .51 | |||||||
General Motors Corp., Series B, 5.25% convertible senior debentures 2032 | $ | 35,000,000 | 24,192 | .24 | ||||||
Other securities | 41,452 | .41 | ||||||||
117,174 | 1.16 | |||||||||
Other - 1.47% | ||||||||||
American Tower Corp. 5.00% convertible debentures 2010 | $ | 25,925,000 | 25,893 | .26 | ||||||
AES Trust VII 6.00% convertible preferred 2008 | 439,925 | 21,402 | .21 | |||||||
Other securities | 100,254 | 1.00 | ||||||||
147,549 | 1.47 | |||||||||
Total convertible securities (cost: $219,305,000) | 264,723 | 2.63 | ||||||||
Shares | Market | Percent | ||||||||
value | of net | |||||||||
Warrants - 0.12% | (000 | ) | assets | |||||||
Other - 0.12% | ||||||||||
American Tower Corp., warrants, expire 2008 (2) (7) | 38,250 | 12,661 | .12 | |||||||
Other securities | 28 | .00 | ||||||||
Total warrants (cost: $1,126,000) | 12,689 | .12 | ||||||||
Shares | Market | Percent | ||||||||
value | of net | |||||||||
Preferred securities - 1.98% | (000 | ) | assets | |||||||
Financials - 1.95% | ||||||||||
Fuji JGB Investment LLC, Series A, 9.87% noncumulative preferred (1) (2) | 52,248,000 | 58,327 | .58 | |||||||
Other securities | 137,368 | 1.37 | ||||||||
195,695 | 1.95 | |||||||||
Other - 0.03% | 3,395 | .03 | ||||||||
Total preferred securities (cost: $169,497,000) | 199,090 | 1.98 | ||||||||
Shares | Market | Percent | ||||||||
value | of net | |||||||||
Common stocks - 0.96% | (000 | ) | assets | |||||||
Other - 0.96% | ||||||||||
Dobson Communications Corp., Class A (2) (7) | 3,435,685 | 26,386 | .26 | |||||||
Sprint Nextel Corp. | 777,508 | 18,489 | .19 | |||||||
Other securities | 51,705 | .51 | ||||||||
Total common stocks (cost: $114,385,000) | 96,580 | .96 | ||||||||
Principal | Market | Percent | ||||||||
amount | value | of net | ||||||||
Short-term securities - 3.28% | (000 | ) | (000 | ) | assets | |||||
Procter & Gamble Co. 3.57%-3.69% due 10/11-10/24/2005 (2) | $ | 95,600 | 95,394 | .95 | ||||||
DuPont (E.I.) de Nemours & Co. 3.55% due 10/18/2005 | 40,000 | 39,929 | .40 | |||||||
Other securities | 194,449 | 1.93 | ||||||||
Total short-term securities (cost: $329,756,000) | 329,772 | 3.28 | ||||||||
Total investment securities (cost: $9,671,967,000) | 9,924,632 | 98.63 | ||||||||
Other assets less liabilities | 137,789 | 1.37 | ||||||||
Net assets | $ | 10,062,421 | 100.00 | % |
"Other securities" includes all issues that are not disclosed separately in the summary investment portfolio.
Investments in affiliates |
A company is considered to be an affiliate of the fund under the Investment Company Act of 1940 if the |
fund's holdings in that company represent 5% or more of the outstanding voting shares of that company. |
The market value of the fund's holdings in affiliated companies is included in "Other securities" under |
their respective industry sectors in the preceding summary investment portfolio. Further details on these holdings |
and related transactions during the year ended September 30, 2005, appear below. |
Market value | |||||||||||||||||||
Beginning shares | Ending shares | Interest | of affiliates | ||||||||||||||||
or principal | or principal | income | at 9/30/05 | ||||||||||||||||
Company | amount | Purchases | Sales | amount | (000 | ) | (000 | ) | |||||||||||
ZiLOG, Inc. (7) | 1,140,500 | - | - | 1,140,500 | $ | - | $ | 3,022 | |||||||||||
ZiLOG, Inc. - MOD III Inc., units (7) (8) | 1,868 | - | - | 1,868 | - | 0 | |||||||||||||
Clarent Hospital Corp. (7) (8) | 576,849 | - | - | 576,849 | - | 289 | |||||||||||||
AirGate PCS, Inc. 9.375% 2009 (2) (9) | $ | 16,253,200 | $ | - | $ | 11,719,900 | $ | 4,533,300 | 1,332 | - | |||||||||
AirGate PCS, Inc. 9.375% 2009 (9) | $ | 6,000,000 | $ | - | $ | 6,000,000 | $ | - | 451 | - | |||||||||
AirGate PCS, Inc. (9) | 671,293 | - | 671,293 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||
NTELOS Inc. (9) | 1,983,310 | - | 1,983,310 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||
NTELOS Inc. 9.03% 2012 (1) (9) | $ | - | $ | 40,250,000 | $ | - | $ | 40,250,000 | 1,950 | - | |||||||||
$ | 3,733 | $ | 3,311 | ||||||||||||||||
The following footnotes to the summary investment portfolio apply to either the individual securities noted or one or more of the securities aggregated and listed as a single item. |
(1) Coupon rate may change periodically. |
(2) Purchased in a private placement transaction; resale may be limited to qualified institutional buyers; resale to the public may require |
registration. The total value of all such restricted securities, including those in "Other securities" in the summary investment portfolio, |
was $1,739,799,000, which represented 17.29% of the net assets of the fund. |
(3) Step bond; coupon rate will increase at a later date. |
(4) Payment in kind; the issuer has the option of paying additional securities in lieu of cash. |
(5) Pass-through securities backed by a pool of mortgages or other loans on which principal payments are |
periodically made. Therefore, the effective maturities are shorter than the stated maturities. |
(6) Index-linked bond whose principal amount moves with a government retail price index. |
(7) Security did not produce income during the last 12 months. |
(8) Valued under fair value procedures adopted by authority of the Board of Trustees. |
(9) Unaffiliated issuer at 9/30/2005. |
See Notes to Financial Statements |
Statement of assets and liabilities (dollars and shares in thousands, except per-share amounts) | ||||||||||
at September 30, 2005 | ||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||
Investment securities at market: | ||||||||||
Unaffiliated issuers (cost: $9,649,514) | $ | 9,921,321 | ||||||||
Affiliated issuers (cost: $22,453) | 3,311 | $ | 9,924,632 | |||||||
Cash | 7,686 | |||||||||
Receivables for: | ||||||||||
Sales of investments | 6,749 | |||||||||
Sales of fund's shares | 25,845 | |||||||||
Open forward currency contracts | 1,988 | |||||||||
Closed forward currency contracts | 270 | |||||||||
Dividends and interest | 189,001 | 223,853 | ||||||||
10,156,171 | ||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||
Payables for: | ||||||||||
Purchases of investments | 69,373 | |||||||||
Repurchases of fund's shares | 12,699 | |||||||||
Dividends on fund's shares | 4,013 | |||||||||
Open forward currency contracts | 19 | |||||||||
Investment advisory services | 2,505 | |||||||||
Services provided by affiliates | 3,903 | |||||||||
Deferred Trustees' compensation | 110 | |||||||||
Other fees and expenses | 1,128 | 93,750 | ||||||||
Net assets at September 30, 2005 | $ | 10,062,421 | ||||||||
Net assets consist of: | ||||||||||
Capital paid in on shares of beneficial interest | $ | 10,012,473 | ||||||||
Undistributed net investment income | 49,132 | |||||||||
Accumulated net realized loss | (253,350 | ) | ||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation | 254,166 | |||||||||
Net assets at September 30, 2005 | $ | 10,062,421 | ||||||||
Shares of beneficial interest issued and outstanding - unlimited shares authorized (819,826 total shares outstanding) | ||||||||||
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share (1 | ) | |||||||
Class A | $ | 7,447,841 | 606,805 | $ | 12.27 | |||||
Class B | 771,089 | 62,824 | 12.27 | |||||||
Class C | 803,719 | 65,482 | 12.27 | |||||||
Class F | 636,539 | 51,861 | 12.27 | |||||||
Class 529-A | 66,498 | 5,418 | 12.27 | |||||||
Class 529-B | 15,265 | 1,244 | 12.27 | |||||||
Class 529-C | 31,979 | 2,605 | 12.27 | |||||||
Class 529-E | 4,092 | 333 | 12.27 | |||||||
Class 529-F | 2,795 | 228 | 12.27 | |||||||
Class R-1 | 6,000 | 489 | 12.27 | |||||||
Class R-2 | 74,499 | 6,070 | 12.27 | |||||||
Class R-3 | 96,948 | 7,899 | 12.27 | |||||||
Class R-4 | 42,427 | 3,457 | 12.27 | |||||||
Class R-5 | 62,730 | 5,111 | 12.27 |
(1) Maximum offering price and redemption price per share were equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for classes A and 529-A, for which the maximum offering prices per share were $12.75 for each. |
See Notes to Financial Statements | |||||||
Statement of operations | |||||||
for the year ended September 30, 2005 & #160; (dollars in thousands) | |||||||
Investment income: | |||||||
Income: | |||||||
Interest (net of non-U.S. withholding tax of $530; also includes $3,733 from affiliates) | $ | 757,657 | |||||
Dividends | 12,011 | $ | 769,668 | ||||
Fees and expenses:(1) | |||||||
Investment advisory services | 32,867 | ||||||
Distribution services | 36,154 | ||||||
Transfer agent services | 6,937 | ||||||
Administrative services | 3,461 | ||||||
Reports to shareholders | 358 | ||||||
Registration statement and prospectus | 404 | ||||||
Postage, stationery and supplies | 811 | ||||||
Trustees' compensation | 62 | ||||||
Auditing and legal | 110 | ||||||
Custodian | 290 | ||||||
State and local taxes | 118 | ||||||
Other | 81 | ||||||
Total fees and expenses before reimbursements/waivers | 81,653 | ||||||
Less reimbursement/waiver of fees and expenses: | |||||||
Investment advisory services | 2,473 | ||||||
Administrative services | 268 | ||||||
Total fees and expenses after reimbursements/waivers | 78,912 | ||||||
Net investment income | 690,756 | ||||||
Net realized gain and unrealized depreciation on investments and non-U.S. currency: | |||||||
Net realized gain on: | |||||||
Investments (including $44,540 net gain from affiliates) | 232,078 | ||||||
Non-U.S. currency transactions | 5,145 | 237,223 | |||||
Net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on: | |||||||
Investments | (234,827 | ) | |||||
Non-U.S. currency translations | 2,319 | (232,508 | ) | ||||
Net realized gain and unrealized depreciation on investments and non-U.S. currency | 4,715 | ||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | $ | 695,471 | |||||
(1) Additional information related to class-specific fees and expenses is included in the Notes to Financial Statements. | |||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements | |||||||
Statements of changes in net assets (dollars in thousands) | |||||||
Year ended September 30 | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Operations: | |||||||
Net investment income | $ | 690,756 | $ | 638,825 | |||
Net realized gain on investments and | |||||||
non-U.S. currency transactions | 237,223 | 75,234 | |||||
Net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation | |||||||
on investments and non-U.S. currency translations | (232,508 | ) | 164,287 | ||||
Net increase in net assets | |||||||
resulting from operations | 695,471 | 878,346 | |||||
Dividends paid or accrued to shareholders from net investment income | (694,615 | ) | (614,168 | ) | |||
Capital share transactions | 664,719 | 751,870 | |||||
Total increase in net assets | 665,575 | 1,016,048 | |||||
Net assets: | |||||||
Beginning of year | 9,396,846 | 8,380,798 | |||||
End of year (including undistributed | |||||||
net investment income: $49,132 and $25,548, respectively) | $ | 10,062,421 | $ | 9,396,846 | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements |
Notes to financial statements
1. | Organization and significant accounting policies |
Organization - American High-Income Trust (the "fund") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end, diversified management investment company. The fund seeks a high level of current income and, secondarily, capital appreciation through a diversified, carefully supervised portfolio consisting primarily of lower rated, higher risk corporate bonds.
The fund offers 14 share classes consisting of four retail share classes, five CollegeAmericaÒ savings plan share classes and five retirement plan share classes. The CollegeAmerica savings plan share classes (529-A, 529-B, 529-C, 529-E and 529-F) can be utilized to save for college education. The five retirement plan share classes (R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 and R-5) are sold without any sales charges and do not carry any conversion rights. The fund’s share classes are described below:
Share class | Initial sales charge | Contingent deferred sales charge upon redemption | Conversion feature | |
Classes A and 529-A | Up to 3.75% | None (except 1% for certain redemptions within one year of purchase without an initial sales charge) | None | |
Classes B and 529-B | None | Declines from 5% to 0% for redemptions within six years of purchase | Classes B and 529-B convert to classes A and 529-A, respectively, after eight years | |
Class C | None | 1% for redemptions within one year of purchase | Class C converts to Class F after 10 years | |
Class 529-C | None | 1% for redemptions within one year of purchase | None | |
Class 529-E | None | None | None | |
Classes F and 529-F | None | None | None | |
Classes R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 and R-5 | None | None | None |
Holders of all share classes have equal pro rata rights to assets, dividends and liquidation proceeds. Each share class has identical voting rights, except for the exclusive right to vote on matters affecting only its class. Share classes have different fees and expenses ("class-specific fees and expenses"), primarily due to different arrangements for distribution, administrative and shareholder services. Differences in class-specific fees and expenses will result in differences in net investment income and, therefore, the payment of different per-share dividends by each class.
Significant accounting policies - The financial statements have been prepared to comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the fund:
Security valuation - Equity securities are valued at the official closing price of, or the last reported sale price on, the exchange or market on which such securities are traded, as of the close of business on the day the securities are being valued or, lacking any sales, at the last available bid price. Prices for each security are taken from the principal exchange or market in which the security trades. Fixed-income securities, including short-term securities purchased with more than 60 days left to maturity, are valued at prices obtained from an independent pricing service when such prices are available. However, where the investment adviser deems it appropriate, such securities will be valued at the mean quoted bid and asked prices (or bid prices, if asked prices are not available) or at prices for securities of comparable maturity, quality and type. Securities with both fixed-income and equity characteristics, or equity securities traded principally among fixed-income dealers, are valued in the manner described above for either equity or fixed-income securities, depending on which method is deemed most appropriate by the investment adviser. Short-term securities purchased within 60 days to maturity are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. The value of short-term securities originally purchased with maturities greater than 60 days is determined based on an amortized value to par when they reach 60 days or less remaining to maturity. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities held by the fund to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry, state or region. Forward currency contracts are valued at the mean of representative quoted bid and asked prices. Securities and other assets for which representative market quotations are not readily available are fair valued as determined in good faith under procedures adopted by authority of the fund's Board of Trustees. Various factors may be reviewed in order to make a good faith determination of a security’s fair value. These factors include, but are not limited to, the type and cost of the security; contractual or legal restrictions on resale of the security; relevant financial or business developments of the issuer; actively traded similar or related securities; conversion or exchange rights on the security; related corporate actions; significant events occurring after the close of trading in the security; and changes in overall market conditions.
Security transactions and related investment income - Security transactions are recorded by the fund as of the date the trades are executed with brokers. Realized gains and losses from security transactions are determined based on the specific identified cost of the securities. In the event a security is purchased with a delayed payment date, the fund will segregate liquid assets sufficient to meet its payment obligations. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. Market discounts, premiums and original issue discounts on fixed-income securities are amortized daily over the expected life of the security.
Class allocations - Income, fees and expenses (other than class-specific fees and expenses) are allocated daily among the various share classes based on the relative value of their settled shares. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily among the various share classes based on their relative net assets. Class-specific fees and expenses, such as distribution, administrative and shareholder services, are charged directly to the respective share class.
Dividends and distributions to shareholders - Dividends paid to shareholders are declared daily from net investment income and are paid to shareholders monthly. Distributions paid to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Non-U.S. currency translation - Assets and liabilities, including investment securities, denominated in non-U.S. currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Purchases and sales of investment securities and income and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates on the dates of such transactions. In the accompanying financial statements, the effects of changes in non-U.S. exchange rates on investment securities are included with the net realized gain or loss and net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments. The realized gain or loss and unrealized appreciation or depreciation resulting from all other transactions denominated in non-U.S. currencies are disclosed separately.
Forward currency contracts - The fund may enter into forward currency contracts, which represent agreements to exchange non-U.S. currencies on specific future dates at predetermined rates. The fund enters into these contracts to manage its exposure to changes in non-U.S. exchange rates arising from investments denominated in non-U.S. currencies. Upon entering into these contracts, risks may arise from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts and from possible movements in non-U.S. exchange rates. Due to these risks, the fund could incur losses up to the entire contract amount, which may exceed the net unrealized value shown on the accompanying financial statements. On a daily basis, the fund values forward currency contracts based on the applicable exchange rates and records unrealized gains or losses. The fund records realized gains or losses at the time the forward contract is closed or offset by another contract with the same broker for the same settlement date and currency.
2. | Non-U.S. investments |
Investment risk - The risks of investing in securities of non-U.S. issuers may include, but are not limited to, investment and repatriation restrictions; revaluation of currencies; adverse political, social and economic developments; government involvement in the private sector; limited and less reliable investor information; lack of liquidity; certain local tax law considerations; and limited regulation of the securities markets.
Taxation - Dividend and interest income is recorded net of non-U.S. withholding taxes paid. Realized and unrealized gains on securities in certain countries are subject to non-U.S. taxes. The fund records a liability based on realized and unrealized gains to provide for potential non-U.S. taxes payable on these securities. For the year ended September 30, 2005, non-U.S. withholding taxes paid on realized and unrealized gains were $313,000. In addition, as of September 30, 2005, the liability for non-U.S. taxes based on realized and unrealized gains was $211,000.
3. Federal income taxation and distributions
The fund complies with the requirements under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to mutual funds and intends to distribute substantially all of its net taxable income and net capital gains each year. The fund is not subject to income taxes to the extent such distributions are made.
Distributions - Distributions paid to shareholders are based on net investment income and net realized gains determined on a tax basis, which may differ from net investment income and net realized gains for financial reporting purposes. These differences are due primarily to differing treatment for items such as non-U.S. currency gains and losses; short-term capital gains and losses; capital losses related to sales of certain securities within 30 days of purchase; unrealized appreciation of certain investments in non-U.S. securities; deferred expenses; cost of investments sold; paydowns on investments; and net capital losses. The fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the year in which the net investment income and net realized gains are recorded by the fund for financial reporting purposes. As of September 30, 2005, the cost of investment securities, excluding forward currency contracts, for federal income tax purposes was $9,684,233,000.
During the year ended September 30, 2005, the fund reclassified $27,443,000 to undistributed net investment income and $16,000 to capital paid in on shares of beneficial interest from undistributed net realized gain to align financial reporting with tax reporting.
As of September 30, 2005, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Undistributed net investment income and non-U.S. currency gains | $60,277 |
Short-term capital loss deferrals | (245,387) |
Gross unrealized appreciation on investment securities | 531,855 |
Gross unrealized depreciation on investment securities | (291,456) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investment securities | 240,399 |
Undistributed net investment income and currency gains above include currency losses of $874,000 that were realized during the period November 1, 2003, through September 30, 2004. Short-term capital loss deferrals above include a capital loss carryforward of $245,387,000 expiring in 2011. These numbers reflect the utilization of a capital loss carryforward of $215,871,000 during the year ended September 30, 2005. The remaining capital loss carryforward will be used to offset any capital gains realized by the fund in future years through the expiration date. The fund will not make distributions from capital gains while capital loss carryforwards remain. During the year ended September 30, 2005, the fund realized, on a tax basis, a net capital gain of $215,871,000.
Ordinary income distributions paid or accrued to shareholders from net investment income and non-U.S. currency gains were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year ended September 30 | |||||||
Share class | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
Class A | $ | 523,835 | $ | 464,208 | |||
Class B | 51,233 | 48,283 | |||||
Class C | 52,182 | 50,116 | |||||
Class F | 42,973 | 36,395 | |||||
Class 529-A | 4,127 | 2,700 | |||||
Class 529-B | 879 | 603 | |||||
Class 529-C | 1,818 | 1,260 | |||||
Class 529-E | 240 | 150 | |||||
Class 529-F | 176 | 106 | |||||
Class R-1 | 301 | 146 | |||||
Class R-2 | 3,992 | 1,818 | |||||
Class R-3 | 5,166 | 2,365 | |||||
Class R-4 | 2,449 | 1,061 | |||||
Class R-5 | 5,244 | 4,957 | |||||
Total | $ | 694,615 | $ | 614,168 | |||
4. Fees and transactions with related parties
Capital Research and Management Company ("CRMC"), the fund’s investment adviser, is the parent company of American Funds Service Company ("AFS"), the fund’s transfer agent, and American Funds Distributors, Inc. ("AFD"), the principal underwriter of the fund’s shares.
Investment advisory services - The Investment Advisory and Service Agreement with CRMC provides for monthly fees accrued daily. These fees are based on a declining series of annual rates beginning with 0.30% on the first $60 million of daily net assets and decreasing to 0.14% on such assets in excess of $10 billion. The agreement also provides for monthly fees, accrued daily, based on a declining series of rates beginning with 3.00% on the first $8,333,333 of the fund's monthly gross income and decreasing to 1.50% on such income in excess of $50,000,000. CRMC is currently waiving a portion of investment advisory services fees. At the beginning of the period, CRMC waived 5% of these fees and increased the waiver to 10% on April 1, 2005. During the year ended September 30, 2005, total investment advisory services fees waived by CRMC were $2,473,000. As a result, the fee shown on the accompanying financial statements of $32,867,000, which was equivalent to an annualized rate of 0.334%, was reduced to $30,394,000, or 0.309% of average daily net assets.
Class-specific fees and expenses - Expenses that are specific to individual share classes are accrued directly to the respective share class. The principal class-specific fees and expenses are described below:
Distribution services - The fund has adopted plans of distribution for all share classes, except Class R-5. Under the plans, the Board of Trustees approves certain categories of expenses that are used to finance activities primarily intended to sell fund shares and service existing accounts. The plans provide for payments, based on an annualized percentage of average daily net assets, ranging from 0.30% to 1.00% as noted below. In some cases, the Board of Trustees has limited the amounts that may be paid to less than the maximum allowed by the plans. All share classes may use up to 0.25% of average daily net assets to pay service fees, or to compensate AFD for paying service fees, to firms that have entered into agreements with AFD for providing certain shareholder services. The remaining amounts available to be paid under each plan are paid to selling dealers to compensate them for their selling activities.
For classes A and 529-A, the Board of Trustees has also approved the reimbursement of dealer and wholesaler commissions paid by AFD for certain shares sold without a sales charge. These classes reimburse AFD for amounts billed within the prior 15 months but only to the extent that the overall annual expense limit of 0.30% is not exceeded. As of September 30, 2005, there were no unreimbursed expenses subject to reimbursement for classes A or 529-A.
Share class | Currently approved limits | Plan limits |
Class A | 0.30% | 0.30% |
Class 529-A | 0.30 | 0.50 |
Classes B and 529-B | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Classes C, 529-C and R-1 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Class R-2 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
Classes 529-E and R-3 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
Classes F, 529-F and R-4 | 0.25 | 0.50 |
Transfer agent services - The fund has a transfer agent agreement with AFS for classes A and B. Under this agreement, these share classes compensate AFS for transfer agent services including shareholder recordkeeping, communications and transaction processing. AFS is also compensated for certain transfer agent services provided to all other share classes from the administrative services fees paid to CRMC described below.
Administrative services - The fund has an administrative services agreement with CRMC to provide transfer agent and other related shareholder services for all share classes other than classes A and B. Each relevant share class pays CRMC annual fees up to 0.15% (0.10% for Class R-5) based on its respective average daily net assets. Each relevant share class also pays AFS additional amounts for certain transfer agent services. CRMC and AFS may use these fees to compensate third parties for performing these services. CRMC has agreed to pay AFS on the fund's behalf for a portion of the transfer agent services fees for some of the retirement plan share classes. For the year ended September 30, 2005, the total administrative services fees paid by CRMC were $3,000, $263,000 and $2,000 for classes R-1, R-2 and R-3, respectively. Administrative services fees are presented gross of any payments made by CRMC. Each 529 share class is subject to an additional annual administrative services fee of 0.10% of its respective average daily net assets; this fee is payable to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the maintenance of the CollegeAmerica plan. Although these amounts are included with administrative services fees on the accompanying financial statements, the Commonwealth of Virginia is not considered a related party.
Expenses under the agreements described on the previous page for the year ended September 30, 2005, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Share class | Distribution services | Transfer agent services | Administrative services | ||
CRMC administrative services | Transfer agent services | Commonwealth of Virginia administrative services | |||
Class A | $17,033 | $6,189 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Class B | 7,954 | 748 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Class C | 8,128 | Included in administrative services | $1,141 | $194 | Not applicable |
Class F | 1,509 | 810 | 155 | Not applicable | |
Class 529-A | 100 | 75 | 10 | $58 | |
Class 529-B | 140 | 18 | 8 | 14 | |
Class 529-C | 290 | 37 | 13 | 29 | |
Class 529-E | 17 | 5 | 1 | 4 | |
Class 529-F | 3 | 3 | -* | 2 | |
Class R-1 | 48 | 7 | 5 | Not applicable | |
Class R-2 | 471 | 94 | 431 | Not applicable | |
Class R-3 | 383 | 112 | 104 | Not applicable | |
Class R-4 | 78 | 50 | 7 | Not applicable | |
Class R-5 | Not applicable | 71 | 3 | Not applicable | |
Total | $36,154 | $6,937 | $2,423 | $931 | $107 |
* Amount less than one thousand.
Deferred Trustees’ compensation - Since the adoption of the deferred compensation plan in 1993, Trustees who are unaffiliated with CRMC may elect to defer the cash payment of part or all of their compensation. These deferred amounts, which remain as liabilities of the fund, are treated as if invested in shares of the fund or other American Funds. These amounts represent general, unsecured liabilities of the fund and vary according to the total returns of the selected funds. Trustees’ compensation of $62,000, shown on the accompanying financial statements, includes $46,000 in current fees (either paid in cash or deferred) and a net increase of $16,000 in the value of the deferred amounts.
Affiliated officers and Trustees - Officers and certain Trustees of the fund are or may be considered to be affiliated with CRMC, AFS and AFD. No affiliated officers or Trustees received any compensation directly from the fund.
5. Capital share transactions
Capital share transactions in the fund were as follows (dollars and shares in thousands):
Share class | Sales(1) | Reinvestments of dividends | Repurchases(1) | Net increase (decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | ||||||||||||||||||
Year ended September 30, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 1,717,183 | 138,578 | $ | 406,479 | 32,844 | $ | (1,596,907 | ) | (129,264 | ) | $ | 526,755 | 42,158 | |||||||||||
Class B | 98,256 | 7,936 | 34,967 | 2,824 | (157,417 | ) | (12,748 | ) | (24,194 | ) | (1,988 | ) | |||||||||||||
Class C | 192,388 | 15,519 | 36,227 | 2,926 | (236,808 | ) | (19,190 | ) | (8,193 | ) | (745 | ) | |||||||||||||
Class F | 313,820 | 25,362 | 31,571 | 2,550 | (286,463 | ) | (23,196 | ) | 58,928 | 4,716 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529-A | 21,884 | 1,765 | 4,106 | 332 | (6,883 | ) | (557 | ) | 19,107 | 1,540 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529-B | 2,891 | 233 | 876 | 71 | (802 | ) | (64 | ) | 2,965 | 240 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529-C | 9,408 | 759 | 1,809 | 146 | (4,153 | ) | (336 | ) | 7,064 | 569 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529-E | 1,309 | 106 | 239 | 19 | (317 | ) | (26 | ) | 1,231 | 99 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529-F | 944 | 76 | 174 | 14 | (378 | ) | (30 | ) | 740 | 60 | |||||||||||||||
Class R-1 | 3,243 | 261 | 298 | 24 | (868 | ) | (70 | ) | 2,673 | 215 | |||||||||||||||
Class R-2 | 45,263 | 3,652 | 3,965 | 321 | (18,208 | ) | (1,476 | ) | 31,020 | 2,497 | |||||||||||||||
Class R-3 | 81,319 | 6,577 | 5,107 | 413 | (47,837 | ) | (3,844 | ) | 38,589 | 3,146 | |||||||||||||||
Class R-4 | 35,411 | 2,847 | 2,410 | 195 | (18,452 | ) | (1,500 | ) | 19,369 | 1,542 | |||||||||||||||
Class R-5 | 20,105 | 1,623 | 3,958 | 320 | (35,398 | ) | (2,867 | ) | (11,335 | ) | (924 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total net increase (decrease) | $ | 2,543,424 | 205,294 | $ | 532,186 | 42,999 | $ | (2,410,891 | ) | (195,168 | ) | $ | 664,719 | 53,125 | |||||||||||
Year ended September 30, 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 1,862,662 | 152,602 | $ | 359,214 | 29,474 | $ | (1,731,964 | ) | (142,224 | ) | $ | 489,912 | 39,852 | |||||||||||
Class B | 167,188 | 13,713 | 33,715 | 2,766 | (165,278 | ) | (13,595 | ) | 35,625 | 2,884 | |||||||||||||||
Class C | 272,859 | 22,356 | 35,669 | 2,926 | (292,482 | ) | (24,036 | ) | 16,046 | 1,246 | |||||||||||||||
Class F | 376,997 | 30,929 | 26,986 | 2,214 | (312,222 | ) | (25,587 | ) | 91,761 | 7,556 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529-A | 20,309 | 1,663 | 2,696 | 221 | (4,860 | ) | (398 | ) | 18,145 | 1,486 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529-B | 4,872 | 399 | 601 | 49 | (630 | ) | (52 | ) | 4,843 | 396 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529-C | 10,770 | 882 | 1,253 | 103 | (3,804 | ) | (312 | ) | 8,219 | 673 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529-E | 1,398 | 115 | 149 | 12 | (274 | ) | (23 | ) | 1,273 | 104 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529-F | 1,069 | 88 | 105 | 9 | (168 | ) | (14 | ) | 1,006 | 83 | |||||||||||||||
Class R-1 | 2,961 | 244 | 144 | 12 | (901 | ) | (74 | ) | 2,204 | 182 | |||||||||||||||
Class R-2 | 37,305 | 3,059 | 1,799 | 148 | (10,667 | ) | (875 | ) | 28,437 | 2,332 | |||||||||||||||
Class R-3 | 53,552 | 4,384 | 2,343 | 193 | (12,081 | ) | (993 | ) | 43,814 | 3,584 | |||||||||||||||
Class R-4 | 18,450 | 1,510 | 1,056 | 87 | (5,080 | ) | (418 | ) | 14,426 | 1,179 | |||||||||||||||
Class R-5 | 30,926 | 2,547 | 3,159 | 259 | (37,926 | ) | (3,102 | ) | (3,841 | ) | (296 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total net increase (decrease) | $ | 2,861,318 | 234,491 | $ | 468,889 | 38,473 | $ | (2,578,337 | ) | (211,703 | ) | $ | 751,870 | 61,261 | |||||||||||
(1) Includes exchanges between share classes of the fund. |
6. Forward currency contracts
As of September 30, 2005, the fund had outstanding forward currency contracts to sell non-U.S. currencies as follows (dollars in thousands):
U.S. valuations at September 30, 2005 | ||||
Non-U.S. currency contracts | Contract amount | Unrealized | ||
Amount | appreciation | |||
Non-U.S. | U.S. | |||
Sales: | ||||
Euros expiring 10/5/2005 to 5/10/2006 | €76,609 | $94,427 | $92,458 | $1,969 |
7. Investment transactions and other disclosures
The fund made purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, of $4,224,542,000 and $3,658,377,000, respectively, during the year ended September 30, 2005.
The fund receives a reduction in its custodian fee equal to the amount of interest calculated on certain cash balances held at the custodian bank. For the year ended September 30, 2005, the custodian fee of $290,000, shown on the accompanying financial statements, includes $281,000 that was offset by this reduction, rather than paid in cash.
CollegeAmerica is a registered trademark of and sponsored by the Virginia College Savings Plan.SM
Financial highlights (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | Net investment income | Net gains (losses) on securities (both realized and unrealized) | Total from investment operations | Dividends (from net investment income) | Net asset value, end of period | Total return (3) | Net assets, end of period (in millions) | Ratio of expenses to average net assets before reimbursements/waivers | Ratio of expenses to average net assets after reimbursements/waivers (4) | Ratio of net income to average net assets | |||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | $ | 12.26 | $ | .89 | $ | .01 | $ | .90 | $ | (.89 | ) | $ | 12.27 | 7.54 | % | $ | 7,448 | .68 | % | .65 | % | 7.17 | % | ||||||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .87 | .35 | 1.22 | (.84 | ) | 12.26 | 10.57 | 6,920 | .67 | .67 | 7.19 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2003 | 9.62 | .93 | 2.25 | 3.18 | (.92 | ) | 11.88 | 34.30 | 6,235 | .75 | .75 | 8.49 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2002 | 11.27 | 1.08 | (1.65 | ) | (.57 | ) | (1.08 | ) | 9.62 | (5.88 | ) | 3,327 | .88 | .88 | 9.99 | ||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2001 | 12.93 | 1.20 | (1.61 | ) | (.41 | ) | (1.25 | ) | 11.27 | (3.44 | ) | 2,936 | .83 | .83 | 9.75 | ||||||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .80 | .01 | .81 | (.80 | ) | 12.27 | 6.72 | 771 | 1.45 | 1.43 | 6.39 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .78 | .35 | 1.13 | (.75 | ) | 12.26 | 9.71 | 794 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 6.40 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2003 | 9.62 | .84 | 2.25 | 3.09 | (.83 | ) | 11.88 | 33.28 | 736 | 1.51 | 1.51 | 7.63 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2002 | 11.27 | 1.00 | (1.65 | ) | (.65 | ) | (1.00 | ) | 9.62 | (6.57 | ) | 294 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 9.28 | ||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2001 | 12.93 | 1.10 | (1.61 | ) | (.51 | ) | (1.15 | ) | 11.27 | (4.17 | ) | 123 | 1.57 | 1.57 | 8.75 | ||||||||||||||
Class C: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .79 | .01 | .80 | (.79 | ) | 12.27 | 6.65 | 804 | 1.51 | 1.49 | 6.32 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .77 | .35 | 1.12 | (.74 | ) | 12.26 | 9.62 | 812 | 1.54 | 1.54 | 6.31 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2003 | 9.62 | .83 | 2.25 | 3.08 | (.82 | ) | 11.88 | 33.17 | 772 | 1.60 | 1.60 | 7.49 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2002 | 11.27 | .99 | (1.65 | ) | (.66 | ) | (.99 | ) | 9.62 | (6.65 | ) | 262 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 9.21 | ||||||||||||||
Period from 3/15/2001 to 9/30/2001 | 12.48 | .53 | (1.15 | ) | (.62 | ) | (.59 | ) | 11.27 | (5.11 | ) | 44 | 1.70 (5 | ) | 1.7 0(5 | ) | 8.54 (5 | ) | |||||||||||
Class F: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .88 | .01 | .89 | (.88 | ) | 12.27 | 7.45 | 637 | .76 | .74 | 7.07 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .86 | .35 | 1.21 | (.83 | ) | 12.26 | 10.44 | 578 | .79 | .78 | 7.05 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2003 | 9.62 | .92 | 2.25 | 3.17 | (.91 | ) | 11.88 | 34.17 | 470 | .84 | .84 | 8.26 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2002 | 11.27 | 1.07 | (1.65 | ) | (.58 | ) | (1.07 | ) | 9.62 | (5.95 | ) | 156 | .93 | .93 | 9.95 | ||||||||||||||
Period from 3/15/2001 to 9/30/2001 | 12.48 | .57 | (1.15 | ) | (.58 | ) | (.63 | ) | 11.27 | (4.86 | ) | 32 | 0.93 (5 | ) | 0.93 (5 | ) | 9.32 (5 | ) | |||||||||||
Class 529-A: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .88 | .01 | .89 | (.88 | ) | 12.27 | 7.44 | 66 | .77 | .75 | 7.09 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .86 | .35 | 1.21 | (.83 | ) | 12.26 | 10.48 | 48 | .76 | .76 | 7.12 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2003 | 9.62 | .92 | 2.25 | 3.17 | (.91 | ) | 11.88 | 34.17 | 28 | .77 | .77 | 8.36 | |||||||||||||||||
Period from 2/19/2002 to 9/30/2002 | 11.37 | .65 | (1.76 | ) | (1.11 | ) | (.64 | ) | 9.62 | (10.11 | ) | 7 | 1.07 (5 | ) | 1.07 (5 | ) | 10.4 0(5 | ) | |||||||||||
Class 529-B: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .77 | .01 | .78 | (.77 | ) | 12.27 | 6.52 | 15 | 1.64 | 1.61 | 6.22 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .75 | .35 | 1.10 | (.72 | ) | 12.26 | 9.47 | 12 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 6.20 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2003 | 9.62 | .82 | 2.25 | 3.07 | (.81 | ) | 11.88 | 33.01 | 7 | 1.73 | 1.73 | 7.36 | |||||||||||||||||
Period from 2/25/2002 to 9/30/2002 | 11.23 | .59 | (1.63 | ) | (1.04 | ) | (.57 | ) | 9.62 | (9.54 | ) | 2 | 1.82 (5 | ) | 1.82 (5 | ) | 9.67 (5 | ) | |||||||||||
Class 529-C: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .77 | .01 | .78 | (.77 | ) | 12.27 | 6.53 | 32 | 1.63 | 1.60 | 6.23 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .75 | .35 | 1.10 | (.72 | ) | 12.26 | 9.49 | 25 | 1.66 | 1.66 | 6.21 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2003 | 9.62 | .82 | 2.25 | 3.07 | (.81 | ) | 11.88 | 33.03 | 16 | 1.71 | 1.71 | 7.43 | |||||||||||||||||
Period from 2/19/2002 to 9/30/2002 | 11.37 | .60 | (1.76 | ) | (1.16 | ) | (.59 | ) | 9.62 | (10.52 | ) | 4 | 1.80 (5 | ) | 1.80 (5 | ) | 9.65 (5 | ) | |||||||||||
Class 529-E: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .84 | .01 | .85 | (.84 | ) | 12.27 | 7.09 | 4 | 1.10 | 1.07 | 6.77 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .82 | .35 | 1.17 | (.79 | ) | 12.26 | 10.06 | 3 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 6.75 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2003 | 9.62 | .88 | 2.25 | 3.13 | (.87 | ) | 11.88 | 33.73 | 2 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 7.94 | |||||||||||||||||
Period from 3/15/2002 to 9/30/2002 | 11.57 | .57 | (1.96 | ) | (1.39 | ) | (.56 | ) | 9.62 | (12.29 | ) | - (6) | 1.27 (5 | ) | 1.27 (5 | ) | 10.45 (5 | ) | |||||||||||
Class 529-F: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .88 | .01 | .89 | (.88 | ) | 12.27 | 7.45 | 3 | .75 | .72 | 7.13 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .85 | .35 | 1.20 | (.82 | ) | 12.26 | 10.34 | 2 | .88 | .88 | 6.99 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2003 | 9.62 | .91 | 2.25 | 3.16 | (.90 | ) | 11.88 | 34.06 | 1 | .92 | .92 | 7.96 | |||||||||||||||||
Period from 9/16/2002 to 9/30/2002 | 9.88 | .08 | (.30 | ) | (.22 | ) | (.04 | ) | 9.62 | (2.23 | ) | -(6) | .05 | .05 | .77 | ||||||||||||||
Class R-1: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | $ | 12.26 | $ | .78 | $ | .01 | $ | .79 | $ | (.78 | ) | $ | 12.27 | 6.61 | % | $ | 6 | 1.61 | % | 1.52 | % | 6.35 | % | ||||||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .76 | .35 | 1.11 | (.73 | ) | 12.26 | 9.59 | 3 | 1.68 | 1.56 | 6.32 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2003 | 9.62 | .83 | 2.25 | 3.08 | (.82 | ) | 11.88 | 33.16 | 1 | 2.01 | 1.60 | 7.20 | |||||||||||||||||
Period from 7/11/2002 to 9/30/2002 | 10.00 | .23 | (.40 | ) | (.17 | ) | (.21 | ) | 9.62 | (1.70 | ) | -(5) | 2.07 | .38 | 2.32 | ||||||||||||||
Class R-2: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .79 | .01 | .80 | (.79 | ) | 12.27 | 6.64 | 74 | 1.94 | 1.49 | 6.36 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .77 | .35 | 1.12 | (.74 | ) | 12.26 | 9.63 | 44 | 2.10 | 1.53 | 6.36 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2003 | 9.62 | .84 | 2.25 | 3.09 | (.83 | ) | 11.88 | 33.21 | 15 | 2.31 | 1.57 | 7.34 | |||||||||||||||||
Period from 6/18/2002 to 9/30/2002 | 10.76 | .31 | (1.18 | ) | (.87 | ) | (.27 | ) | 9.62 | (8.05 | ) | -(5) | .85 | .48 | 3.17 | ||||||||||||||
Class R-3: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .84 | .01 | .85 | (.84 | ) | 12.27 | 7.06 | 97 | 1.13 | 1.10 | 6.74 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .82 | .35 | 1.17 | (.79 | ) | 12.26 | 10.05 | 58 | 1.15 | 1.14 | 6.76 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2003 | 9.62 | .88 | 2.25 | 3.13 | (.87 | ) | 11.88 | 33.71 | 14 | 1.28 | 1.18 | 7.74 | |||||||||||||||||
Period from 6/21/2002 to 9/30/2002 | 10.60 | .31 | (1.01 | ) | (.70 | ) | (.28 | ) | 9.62 | (6.63 | ) | 1 | .51 | .36 | 3.21 | ||||||||||||||
Class R-4: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .88 | .01 | .89 | (.88 | ) | 12.27 | 7.46 | 42 | .75 | .72 | 7.14 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .86 | .35 | 1.21 | (.83 | ) | 12.26 | 10.45 | 24 | .79 | .78 | 7.11 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2003 | 9.62 | .92 | 2.25 | 3.17 | (.91 | ) | 11.88 | 34.17 | 9 | .86 | .83 | 8.13 | |||||||||||||||||
Period from 7/19/2002 to 9/30/2002 | 9.97 | .22 | (.38 | ) | (.16 | ) | (.19 | ) | 9.62 | (1.58 | ) | -(5) | 9.55 | .14 | 2.25 | ||||||||||||||
Class R-5: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .92 | .01 | .93 | (.92 | ) | 12.27 | 7.78 | 63 | .46 | .43 | 7.37 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .90 | .35 | 1.25 | (.87 | ) | 12.26 | 10.80 | 74 | .47 | .47 | 7.39 | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2003 | 9.62 | .95 | 2.25 | 3.20 | (.94 | ) | 11.88 | 34.61 | 75 | .52 | .52 | 8.77 | |||||||||||||||||
Period from 5/15/2002 to 9/30/2002 | 11.30 | .42 | (1.70 | ) | (1.28 | ) | (.40 | ) | 9.62 | (11.41 | ) | 42 | .23 | .23 | 4.25 |
Year ended September 30 | |||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||
Portfolio turnover rate for all classes of shares | 39% | 39% | 41% | 34% | 44% |
(1) Based on operations for the period shown (unless otherwise noted) and, accordingly, may not be representative of a full year. | ||||||||||||
(2) Based on average shares outstanding. | ||||||||||||
(3) Total returns exclude all sales charges, including contingent deferred sales charges. | ||||||||||||
(4) The ratios in this column reflect the impact, if any, of certain reimbursements/waivers from CRMC. | ||||||||||||
During some of the periods shown, CRMC reduced fees for investment advisory services for all share classes. In addition, during the start-up period | ||||||||||||
for the retirement plan share classes (except Class R-5), CRMC agreed to pay a portion of the fees related to transfer agent services. | ||||||||||||
(5) Annualized. | ||||||||||||
(6) Amount less than $1 million. | ||||||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements |
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of American High-Income Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of American High-Income Trust (the “Fund”), including the summary investment portfolio, as of September 30, 2005, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of September 30, 2005, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of American High-Income Trust as of September 30, 2005, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Costa Mesa, California
November 9, 2005
Tax information unaudited
We are required to advise you within 60 days of the fund’s fiscal year-end regarding the federal tax status of certain distributions received by shareholders during such fiscal year. The information below is provided for the fund’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2005.
Individual shareholders are eligible for reduced tax rates on qualified dividend income. The fund designates $4,307,000 of the dividends received as qualified dividend income.
Corporate shareholders may exclude up to 70% of qualifying dividends. The fund designates $4,738,000 of dividends received as qualified dividend income.
For state tax purposes, certain states may exempt from income taxation that portion of the income dividends paid by the fund that were derived from direct U.S. government obligations. The fund designates $3,654,000 as interest derived on direct U.S. government obligations.
Individual shareholders should refer to their Form 1099-DIV or other tax information, which will be mailed in January 2006, to determine the calendar year amounts to be included on their 2005 tax returns. Shareholders should consult their tax advisers.
Expense example unaudited
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs such as initial sales charges on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions (loads); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund so you can compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (April 1, 2005, through September 30, 2005).
Actual expenses:
The first line of each share class in the table on the next page provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled "Expenses paid during period" to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period. There are some account fees that are charged to certain types of accounts, such as Individual Retirement Accounts and CollegeAmerica accounts (generally, a $10 fee is charged to set up the account and an additional $10 fee is charged to the account annually) that would increase the amount of expenses paid on your account. In addition, retirement plan participants may be subject to certain fees charged by the plan sponsor, and Class F and Class 529-F shareholders may be subject to fees charged by financial intermediaries, typically ranging from 0.75% to 1.50% of assets annually depending on services offered. You can estimate the impact of these fees by adding the amount of the fees to the total estimated expenses you paid on your account during the period as calculated above. In addition, your ending account value would also be lower by the amount of these fees.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes:
The second line of each share class in the table on the next page provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio for the share class and an assumed rate of return of 5.00% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of the share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5.00% hypothetical example with the 5.00% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. There are some account fees that are charged to certain shareholders, such as Individual Retirement Accounts and CollegeAmerica accounts (generally, a $10 fee is charged to set up the account and an additional $10 fee is charged to the account annually) that would increase the amount of expenses paid on your account. In addition, retirement plan participants may be subject to certain fees charged by the plan sponsor, and Class F and Class 529-F shareholders may be subject to fees charged by financial intermediaries, typically ranging from 0.75% to 1.50% of assets annually depending on services offered. You can estimate the impact of these fees by adding the amount of the fees to the total estimated expenses you paid on your account during the period as calculated above. In addition, your ending account value would also be lower by the amount of these fees.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line of each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning account value 4/1/2005 | Ending account value 9/30/2005 | Expenses paid during period 1 | Annualized expense ratio | |||||
Class A -- actual return | $1,000.00 | $1,042.59 | $3.33 | .65% | ||||
Class A -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,021.81 | 3.29 | .65 | ||||
Class B -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,038.62 | 7.26 | 1.42 | ||||
Class B -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,017.95 | 7.18 | 1.42 | ||||
Class C -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,038.41 | 7.46 | 1.46 | ||||
Class C -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,017.75 | 7.38 | 1.46 | ||||
Class F -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,042.27 | 3.63 | .71 | ||||
Class F -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,021.51 | 3.60 | .71 | ||||
Class 529-A -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,042.14 | 3.74 | .73 | ||||
Class 529-A -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,021.41 | 3.70 | .73 | ||||
Class 529-B -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,037.73 | 8.07 | 1.58 | ||||
Class 529-B -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,017.15 | 7.99 | 1.58 | ||||
Class 529-C -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,037.79 | 8.02 | 1.57 | ||||
Class 529-C -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,017.20 | 7.94 | 1.57 | ||||
Class 529-E -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,040.58 | 5.32 | 1.04 | ||||
Class 529-E -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,019.85 | 5.27 | 1.04 | ||||
Class 529-F -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,042.83 | 3.07 | .60 | ||||
Class 529-F -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,022.06 | 3.04 | .60 | ||||
Class R-1 -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,038.15 | 7.72 | 1.51 | ||||
Class R-1 -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,017.50 | 7.64 | 1.51 | ||||
Class R-2 -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,038.26 | 7.56 | 1.48 | ||||
Class R-2 -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,017.65 | 7.49 | 1.48 | ||||
Class R-3 -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,040.29 | 5.58 | 1.09 | ||||
Class R-3 -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,019.60 | 5.52 | 1.09 | ||||
Class R-4 -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,042.37 | 3.53 | .69 | ||||
Class R-4 -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,021.61 | 3.50 | .69 | ||||
Class R-5 -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,043.79 | 2.15 | .42 | ||||
Class R-5 -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,022.96 | 2.13 | .42 | ||||
1 Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period (183), and divided by 365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Approval of renewal of Investment Advisory and Service Agreement
The fund’s Board members have approved the renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory and Service Agreement (the “agreement”) with Capital Research and Management Company (“CRMC”) for an additional one-year term through October 31, 2006. The renewal of the agreement was approved by the Board following the recommendation of the fund’s Contracts Committee (the “committee”), which comprises all of the fund’s independent Board members. The information, material facts and conclusions that formed the basis for the committee’s recommendation and the Board’s subsequent approval are described below.
1. Information received
Materials reviewed — During the course of each year, the independent Board members receive a wide variety of materials relating to the services provided by CRMC, including reports on the fund’s investment results, portfolio composition, portfolio trading practices, shareholder services and other information relating to the nature, extent and quality of services provided by CRMC to the fund. In addition, the committee requests and reviews supplementary information that includes extensive materials regarding the fund’s investment results, advisory fee and expense comparisons (including comparisons to advisory fees charged by an affiliate of CRMC to institutional clients), financial and profitability information regarding CRMC, descriptions of various functions such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and information about the personnel providing investment management and administrative services to the fund.
Review process — The committee received assistance and advice regarding legal and industry standards from independent counsel to the independent Board members. The committee discussed the renewal of the agreement with CRMC representatives and in a private session with independent legal counsel at which no representatives of CRMC were present. In deciding to recommend the renewal of the agreement, the committee did not identify any single or particular piece of information that, in isolation, was the controlling factor. This summary describes the most important, but not all, of the factors considered by the Board and the committee.
2. Nature, extent and quality of services
CRMC, its personnel and its resources — The Board and the committee considered the depth and quality of CRMC’s investment management process, including its global research capabilities; the experience, capability and integrity of its senior management and other personnel; the low turnover rates of its key personnel; the overall financial strength and stability of its organization; and the ability of its organizational structure to address the recent growth in assets under management. The Board and the committee also considered that CRMC made available to its investment professionals a variety of resources and systems relating to investment management, compliance, trading, results and portfolio accounting. They considered CRMC’s commitment to investing in information technology supporting investment management and compliance. They further considered CRMC’s continuing need to attract and retain qualified personnel and to maintain and enhance its resources and systems.
Other services — The Board and the committee considered CRMC’s policies, procedures and systems to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations and its commitment to these programs; its efforts to keep the Board members informed; and its attention to matters that may involve conflicts of interest with the fund. The Board and the committee also considered the nature, extent, quality and cost of administrative, distribution and shareholder services provided by CRMC to the fund under the agreement and other agreements, including the information technology, legal, and fund accounting and treasury functions.
The Board and the committee concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by CRMC have benefited and will continue to benefit the fund and its shareholders.
3. Investment results
The Board and committee considered the investment results of the fund in light of its primary objective of providing a high level of current income and its secondary objective of capital appreciation. They compared the fund’s total returns with the total returns of the Lipper High Current Yield Bond Funds Index (the Lipper category that includes the fund), the averages of the funds included in the index each year, and the total returns of the Credit Suisse First Boston High Yield Index.
The Board and the committee noted that for the seven months ended July 31, 2005, and the three-, five- and 10-year periods ended July 31, 2005, the fund’s investment results exceeded those of both indexes (except the Credit Suisse Index for the five-year period) and the averages of the comparable funds in the Lipper Index. The Board and the committee ultimately concluded that CRMC’s record in managing the fund indicates that its continued management will benefit the fund and its shareholders.
4. Advisory fees and total expenses
The Board and the committee compared the advisory fees and total expenses of the fund (each as a percentage of average net assets) with the median fee and expense levels of all other funds in the Lipper High Current Yield Bond Funds Index. The Board and the committee observed that the fund’s advisory fee and total expenses were well below the median fees and expenses for all such other funds for the entire 10-year period ended September 30, 2004. The Board and the committee also noted the complexwide 5% voluntary advisory fee waiver that CRMC put into effect during 2004, and the additional 5% advisory fee waiver implemented effective April 1, 2005. The Board and the committee concluded that the relatively low level of the fees charged by CRMC will benefit the fund and its shareholders.
The Board and the committee also reviewed information regarding the advisory fees paid by institutional clients of an affiliate of CRMC with similar investment mandates. They concluded that, although the fees paid by those clients generally were lower than those paid by American Funds, the differences appropriately reflected CRMC’s significantly greater responsibilities with respect to American Funds and the more comprehensive regulatory regime applicable to mutual funds.
5. Adviser costs, level of profits and economies of scale
The Board and the committee reviewed information regarding CRMC’s costs of providing services to American Funds, as well as the resulting level of profits to CRMC, noting that those results were comparable to the reported results of several large, publicly held investment management companies. The committee also received information during the past year regarding the structure and manner in which CRMC’s investment professionals were compensated and CRMC’s view of the relationship of such compensation to the attraction and retention of quality personnel. The Board and the committee considered CRMC’s willingness to invest in technology, infrastructure and staff to reinforce and offer new services and to accommodate changing regulatory requirements. They further considered that breakpoints in the fund’s advisory fee structure provide for reductions in the level of fees charged by CRMC to the fund as fund assets and gross income increase, reflecting economies of scale in the cost of operations that are shared with fund shareholders. The Board and the committee concluded that the fund’s cost structure was reasonable and that CRMC was sharing economies of scale with the fund and its shareholders, to their benefit.
6. Ancillary benefits
The Board and the committee considered a variety of other benefits received by CRMC and its affiliates as a result of CRMC’s relationship with the fund and the other American Funds, including fees for administrative services provided to certain share classes; fees paid to CRMC’s affiliated transfer agent; sales charges and distribution fees received and retained by the fund’s principal
underwriter, an affiliate of CRMC; and possible ancillary benefits to CRMC’s institutional management affiliate. The Board and the committee reviewed CRMC’s portfolio trading practices, noting that, while CRMC receives the benefit of research provided by broker-dealers executing portfolio transactions on behalf of the fund, it does not obtain third-party research or other services in return for allocating brokerage to such broker-dealers.
7. Conclusions
Based on their review, including their consideration of each of the factors referred to above, the Board and the committee concluded that the agreement is fair and reasonable to the fund and its shareholders, that the fund’s shareholders received reasonable value in return for the advisory fees and other amounts paid to CRMC by the fund, and that the renewal of the agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
Other share class results unaudited
Figures shown are past results and are not predictive of results in future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For the most current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Class B, Class C, Class F and Class 529 | |||
Average annual total returns for periods ended September 30, 2005: | 1 year | 5 years | Life of class |
Class B shares — first sold 3/15/00 | |||
Reflecting applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC), maximum of 5%, payable only if shares are sold within six years of purchase | +1.72% | +6.63% | +6.09% |
Not reflecting CDSC | +6.72% | +6.92% | +6.21% |
Class C shares — first sold 3/15/01 | |||
Reflecting CDSC, maximum of 1%, payable only if shares are sold within one year of purchase | +5.65% | — | +7.33% |
Not reflecting CDSC | +6.65% | — | +7.33% |
Class F shares1— first sold 3/15/01 | |||
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged by sponsoring firm | +7.45% | — | +8.10% |
Class 529-A shares2— first sold 2/19/02 | |||
Reflecting 3.75% maximum sales charge | +3.39% | — | +9.29% |
Not reflecting maximum sales charge | +7.44% | — | +10.44% |
Class 529-B shares2— first sold 2/25/02 | |||
Reflecting applicable CDSC, maximum of 5%, payable only if shares are sold within six years of purchase | +1.52% | — | +9.22% |
Not reflecting CDSC | +6.52% | — | +9.88% |
Class 529-C shares2— first sold 2/19/02 | |||
Reflecting CDSC, maximum of 1%, payable only if shares are sold within one year of purchase | +5.53% | — | +9.51% |
Not reflecting CDSC | +6.53% | — | +9.51% |
Class 529-E shares1,2 — first sold 3/15/02 | +7.09% | — | +9.57% |
Class 529-F shares1,2 — first sold 9/16/02 | |||
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged by sponsoring firm | +7.45% | — | +15.61% |
The fund’s investment adviser waived 5% of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through March 31, 2005, and increased the waiver to 10% on April 1, 2005. Fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. Please see the Financial Highlights table on page 23 for details.
1 These shares are sold without any initial or contingent deferred sales charge.
2 Results shown do not reflect the $10 initial account setup fee and an annual $10 account maintenance fee.
Board of Trustees
“Non-interested” Trustees | ||
Year first elected a Trustee of the fund1 | ||
Name and age | Principal occupation(s) during past five years | |
Ambassador | 1999 | Corporate director and author; former U.S. |
Richard G. Capen, Jr., 71 | Ambassador to Spain; former Vice Chairman, Knight-Ridder, Inc. (communications company); former Chairman and Publisher, The Miami Herald | |
H. Frederick Christie, 72 | 1987 | Private investor; former President and CEO, The Mission Group (non-utility holding company, subsidiary of Southern California Edison Company) |
Diane C. Creel, 57 | 1994 | Chairman of the Board and CEO, Ecovation, Inc. (organic waste management) |
Martin Fenton, 70 | 1989 | Chairman of the Board and CEO, Senior Resource |
Chairman of the Board | Group LLC (development and management of senior | |
(Independent and | living communities) | |
Non-Executive) | ||
Leonard R. Fuller, 59 | 1994 | President and CEO, Fuller Consulting (financial management consulting firm) |
R. Clark Hooper, 59 | 2005 | President, Dumbarton Group LLC (consulting); former Executive Vice President — Policy and Oversight, NASD |
Richard G. Newman, 71 | 1991 | Chairman of the Board, AECOM Technology Corporation (engineering, consulting and professional technical services) |
Frank M. Sanchez, 62 | 1999 | Principal, The Sanchez Family Corporation dba McDonald’s Restaurants (McDonald’s licensee) |
“Non-interested” Trustees | ||
Number of portfolios in fund complex2 overseen by Trustee | ||
Name and age | Other directorships3 held by Trustee | |
Ambassador Richard G. Capen, Jr., 71 | 14 | Carnival Corporation |
H. Frederick Christie, 72 | 19 | Ducommun Incorporated; IHOP Corporation; Southwest Water Company |
Diane C. Creel, 57 | 12 | Allegheny Technologies; BF Goodrich; Foster Wheeler Ltd.; Teledyne Technologies |
Martin Fenton, 70 | 16 | None |
Chairman of the Board | ||
(Independent and | ||
Non-Executive) | ||
Leonard R. Fuller, 59 | 14 | None |
R. Clark Hooper, 59 | 15 | None |
Richard G. Newman, 71 | 13 | Sempra Energy; Southwest Water Company |
Frank M. Sanchez, 62 | 12 | None |
"Interested" Trustees4 | ||
Year first elected | ||
a Trustee | Principal occupation(s) during past five years and | |
Name, age and | or officer | positions held with affiliated entities or the |
position with fund | of the fund1 | principal underwriter of the fund. |
Abner D. Goldstine, 75 | 1987 | Senior Vice President and Director, Capital Research |
Vice Chairman of the Board | and Management Company | |
Paul G. Haaga, Jr., 56 | 1987 | Executive Vice President and Director, Capital |
Vice Chairman of the Board | Research and Management Company; Director, The Capital Group Companies, Inc.5 | |
David C. Barclay, 49 | 1995 | Senior Vice President, Capital Research and |
President | Management Company; Director, The Capital Group Companies, Inc.5 | |
“Interested” Trustees4 | ||
Number of | ||
portfolios | ||
in fund | ||
complex2 | ||
Name, age and | overseen by | |
position with fund | Trustee | Other directorships3 held by Trustee |
Abner D. Goldstine, 75 | 12 | None |
Vice Chairman of the Board | ||
Paul G. Haaga, Jr., 56 | 16 | None |
Vice Chairman of the Board | ||
David C. Barclay, 49 | 1 | None |
President |
The statement of additional information includes additional information about fund Trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling American Funds Service Company at 800/421-0180. The address for all Trustees and officers of the fund is 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071, Attention: Fund Secretary.
1 Trustees and officers of the fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.
2 Capital Research and Management Company manages the American Funds, consisting of 29 funds. Capital Research and Management Company also manages American Funds Insurance Series,® which serves as the underlying investment vehicle for certain variable insurance contracts, and Endowments, whose shareholders are limited to certain nonprofit organizations.
3 This includes all directorships (other than those in the American Funds) that are held by each Trustee as a director of a public company or a registered investment company.
4 “Interested persons” within the meaning of the 1940 Act, on the basis of their affiliation with the fund’s investment adviser, Capital Research and Management Company, or affiliated entities (including the fund’s principal underwriter).
5 Company affiliated with Capital Research and Management Company.
Other officers
Year first | ||
elected an | Principal occupation(s) during past five years | |
Name, age and | officer | and positions held with affiliated entities or the |
position with fund | of the fund1 | principal underwriter of the fund |
Susan M. Tolson, 43 | 1997 | Senior Vice President, Capital Research Company2 |
Senior Vice President | ||
Jennifer L. Hinman, 47 | 2001 | Vice President and Director, Capital Research |
Vice President | Company;2 Director, Capital International Research, Inc.2 | |
Kristine M. Nishiyama, 35 | 2003 | Vice President and Counsel — Fund Business |
Vice President | Management Group, Capital Research and Management Company; Vice President and Counsel, Capital Bank and Trust Company2 | |
Julie F. Williams, 57 | 1987 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Secretary | Group, Capital Research and Management Company | |
Susi M. Silverman, 35 | 2001 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Treasurer | Group, Capital Research and Management Company | |
Kimberly S. Verdick, 41 | 1994 | Assistant Vice President — Fund Business |
Assistant Secretary | Management Group, Capital Research and | |
Management Company | ||
Sharon G. Moseley, 37 | 2003 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Assistant Treasurer | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
1 Trustees and officers of the fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.
2 Company affiliated with Capital Research and Management Company.
Offices of the fund and of the
investment adviser
Capital Research and Management Company
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
135 South State College Boulevard
Brea, CA 92821-5823
Transfer agent for shareholder accounts
American Funds Service Company
(Please write to the address nearest you.)
P.O. Box 25065
Santa Ana, CA 92799-5065
P.O. Box 659522
San Antonio, TX 78265-9522
P.O. Box 6007
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6007
P.O. Box 2280
Norfolk, VA 23501-2280
Custodian of assets
JPMorgan Chase Bank
270 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017-2070
Counsel
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
515 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228
Independent registered public
accounting firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
695 Town Center Drive
Suite 1200
Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7188
Principal underwriter
American Funds Distributors, Inc.
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
There are several ways to invest in American High-Income Trust. Class A shares are subject to a 3.75% maximum up-front sales charge that declines for accounts (and aggregated investments) of $100,000 or more and is eliminated for purchases of $1 million or more. Other share classes, which are generally not available for certain employer-sponsored retirement plans, have no up-front sales charges but are subject to additional annual expenses and fees. Annual expenses for Class B shares were 0.78 percentage points higher than for Class A shares; Class B shares convert to Class A shares after eight years of ownership. If redeemed within six years, Class B shares may also be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) of up to 5% that declines over time. Class C shares were subject to annual expenses 0.84 percentage points higher than those for Class A shares and a 1% CDSC if redeemed within the first year after purchase. Class C shares convert to Class F shares after 10 years. Class F shares, which are available only through certain fee-based programs offered by broker-dealer firms and registered investment advisers, had higher annual expenses (by 0.09 percentage points) than did Class A shares, and an annual asset-based fee charged by the sponsoring firm. Expenses are deducted from income earned by the fund. As a result, dividends and investment results will differ for each share class.
Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the American Funds and CollegeAmerica. This and other important information is contained in the fund’s prospectus and the CollegeAmerica program description, which can be obtained from your financial adviser and should be read carefully before investing. You may also call American Funds Service Company (AFS) at 800/421-0180 or visit the American Funds website at americanfunds.com. If you reside in a state other than Virginia, there may be an in-state plan that provides tax and other benefits not available through CollegeAmerica. Talk to your tax adviser. CollegeAmerica is distributed by American Funds Distributors and sold through unaffiliated intermediaries.
“American Funds Proxy Voting Guidelines” — which describes how we vote proxies relating to portfolio securities — is available free of charge on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) website at www.sec.gov, on the American Funds website or upon request by calling AFS. The fund files its proxy voting record with the SEC for the 12 months ended June 30 by August 31. The report also is available on the SEC and American Funds websites.
A complete September 30, 2005, portfolio of American High-Income Trust’s investments is available free of charge by calling AFS or visiting the SEC website (where it is part of Form N-CSR).
American High Income Trust files a complete list of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. This filing is available free of charge on the SEC website. You may also review or, for a fee, copy this filing at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. (800/SEC-0330). Additionally, the list of portfolio holdings also is available by calling AFS.
This report is for the information of shareholders of American High-Income Trust, but it may also be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus, which gives details about charges, expenses, investment objectives and operating policies of the fund. If used as sales material after December 31, 2005, this report must be accompanied by an American Funds statistical update for the most recently completed calendar quarter.
[logo - AMERICAN FUNDS (R)]
CollegeAmerica is sponsored by
Virginia College Savings PlanSM
What makes American Funds different?
For more than 70 years, we have followed a consistent philosophy that we firmly believe is in our investors’ best interests. The range of opportunities offered by our family of just 29 carefully conceived, broadly diversified funds has attracted over 30 million shareholder accounts.
Our unique combination of strengths includes these five factors:
• | A long-term, value-oriented approach |
Rather than follow fads, we pursue a consistent strategy, focusing on each investment’s long-term potential. |
• | An unparalleled global research effort |
American Funds draws on one of the industry’s most globally integrated research networks. |
• | The multiple portfolio counselor system |
Every American Fund is divided among a number of portfolio counselors. Each takes responsibility for a portion independently, within each fund’s objectives; in most cases, research analysts manage a portion as well. Over time this method has contributed to a consistency of results and continuity of management. |
• | Experienced investment professionals |
The recent market decline was not the first for most of the portfolio counselors who serve the American Funds. More than half of them were in the investment business before the sharp market decline of 1987. |
• | A commitment to low operating expenses |
American Funds’ operating expenses are among the lowest in the mutual fund industry. Our portfolio turnover rates are low as well, keeping transaction costs and tax consequences contained. |
29 mutual funds, consistent philosophy, consistent results
• Growth funds
Emphasis on long-term growth through stocks
AMCAP Fund®
EuroPacific Growth Fund®
The Growth Fund of America®
The New Economy Fund®
New Perspective Fund®
New World FundSM
SMALLCAP World Fund®
• Growth-and-income funds
Emphasis on long-term growth and dividends through stocks
American Mutual Fund®
Capital World Growth and Income FundSM
Fundamental InvestorsSM
The Investment Company of America®
Washington Mutual Investors FundSM
• Equity-income funds
Emphasis on above-average income and growth through stocks and/or bonds
Capital Income Builder®
The Income Fund of America®
• Balanced fund
Emphasis on long-term growth and current income through stocks and bonds
American Balanced Fund®
• Bond funds
Emphasis on current income through bonds
> American High-Income TrustSM
The Bond Fund of AmericaSM
Capital World Bond Fund®
Intermediate Bond Fund of America®
U.S. Government Securities FundSM
• Tax-exempt bond funds
Emphasis on tax-free current income through municipal bonds
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund®
Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of AmericaSM
The Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America®
State-specific tax-exempt funds
The Tax-Exempt Fund of California®
The Tax-Exempt Fund of Maryland®
The Tax-Exempt Fund of Virginia®
• Money market funds
The Cash Management Trust of America®
The Tax-Exempt Money Fund of AmericaSM
The U.S. Treasury Money Fund of AmericaSM
The Capital Group Companies
American Funds
Capital Research and Management
Capital International
Capital Guardian
Capital Bank and Trust
Lit. No. MFGEAR-921-1105P
Litho in USA RCG/L/8049-S4698
Printed on recycled paper
ITEM 2 - Code of Ethics
The Registrant has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. The Registrant undertakes to provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of the Code of Ethics. Such request can be made to American Funds Service Company at 800/421-0180 or to the Secretary of the Registrant, 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California 90071.
ITEM 3 - Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Registrant’s Board has determined that H. Frederick Christie, a member of the Registrant’s Audit Committee, is an “audit committee financial expert” and "independent," as such terms are defined in this Item. This designation will not increase the designee’s duties, obligations or liability as compared to his or her duties, obligations and liability as a member of the Audit Committee and of the Board; nor will it reduce the responsibility of the other Audit Committee members. There may be other individuals who, through education or experience, would qualify as "audit committee financial experts" if the Board had designated them as such. Most importantly, the Board believes each member of the Audit Committee contributes significantly to the effective oversight of the Registrant’s financial statements and condition.
ITEM 4 - Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Registrant: | ||||
a) Audit Fees: | ||||
2004 | $70,000 | |||
2005 | $76,000 | |||
b) Audit-Related Fees: | ||||
2004 | $10,000 | |||
2005 | $2,000 | |||
The audit-related fees consist of assurance and related services relating to the examination of the Registrant’s investment adviser conducted in accordance with Statement on Auditing Standards Number 70 issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. | ||||
c) Tax Fees: | ||||
2004 | $6,000 | |||
2005 | $6,000 | |||
The tax fees consist of professional services relating to the preparation of the Registrant’s tax returns. | ||||
c) All Other Fees: | ||||
2004 | none | |||
2005 | none | |||
Adviser and affiliates (includes only fees for non-audit services billed to the adviser and affiliates for engagements that relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant and were subject to the pre-approval policies described below): | ||||
a) Not Applicable | ||||
b) Audit-Related Fees: | ||||
2004 | $323,000 | |||
2005 | $338,000 | |||
The audit-related fees consist of assurance and related services relating to the examination of the Registrant’s transfer agency and investment adviser conducted in accordance with Statement on Auditing Standards Number 70 issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. | ||||
c) Tax Fees: | ||||
2004 | none | |||
2005 | none | |||
d) All Other Fees: | ||||
2004 | none | |||
2005 | none |
The Registrant’s Audit Committee will pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services that the Committee considers compatible with maintaining the auditors’ independence. The pre-approval requirement will extend to all non-audit services provided to the Registrant, the investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant. The Committee will not delegate its responsibility to pre-approve these services to the investment adviser. The Committee may delegate to one or more Committee members the authority to review and pre-approve audit and permissible non-audit services. Actions taken under any such delegation will be reported to the full Committee at its next meeting. The pre-approval requirement is waived with respect to non-audit services if certain conditions are met. The pre-approval requirement was not waived for any of the non-audit services listed above provided to the Registrant, adviser, and affiliates.
Aggregate non-audit fees paid to the Registrant’s auditors, including fees for all services billed to the Registrant and the adviser and affiliates that provide ongoing services to the Registrant were $886,000 for fiscal year 2004 and $1,048,000 for fiscal year 2005. The non-audit services represented by these amounts were brought to the attention of the Committee and considered to be compatible with maintaining the auditors’ independence.
ITEM 5 - Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable to this Registrant, insofar as the Registrant is not a listed issuer as defined in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
ITEM 6 - Schedule of Investments
[logo - AMERICAN FUNDS (R)]
American High-Income TrustSM
Investment portfolio
September 30, 2005 | ||
Principal amount | Market value | |
Bonds & notes — 89.66% | (000) | (000) |
CORPORATE BONDS & NOTES — 83.90% | ||
CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY — 27.08% | ||
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 6.125% 2007 | $ 5,000 | $ 4,924 |
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 6.15% 2007 | 10,000 | 9,927 |
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 5.85% 2009 | 1,200 | 1,118 |
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 6.875% 2011 | 31,590 | 28,769 |
General Motors Corp. 7.20% 2011 | 28,435 | 25,449 |
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 7.25% 2011 | 35,260 | 32,823 |
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 6.875% 2012 | 33,531 | 30,049 |
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 7.00% 2012 | 42,644 | 38,558 |
General Motors Corp. 7.25% 2013 | €3,000 | 2,997 |
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 6.07% 20141 | $ 9,650 | 8,129 |
General Motors Corp. 7.70% 2016 | 6,250 | 5,031 |
General Motors Corp. 8.25% 2023 | 3,650 | 2,856 |
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 8.00% 2031 | 4,000 | 3,501 |
CCH II, LLC and CCH II Capital Corp. 10.25% 2010 | 14,105 | 14,528 |
Charter Communications Holdings, LLC and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corp. 0%/13.50% 20112 | 5,525 | 4,613 |
Charter Communications Holdings, LLC and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corp. 0%/11.75% 20112 | 6,000 | 4,320 |
Charter Communications Holdings, LLC and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corp. 0%/12.125% 20122 | 2,850 | 1,810 |
Charter Communications Operating, LLC and Charter Communications Operating Capital Corp. 8.00% 20123 | 39,950 | 40,449 |
CCO Holdings, LLC and CCO Holdings Capital Corp. 8.75% 2013 | 24,625 | 24,440 |
Charter Communications Operating, LLC and Charter Communications Operating Capital Corp. 8.375% 20143 | 22,800 | 23,028 |
CanWest Media Inc., Series B, 10.625% 2011 | 16,100 | 17,589 |
CanWest Media Inc., Series B, 8.00% 2012 | 60,258 | 64,250 |
CanWest Media Inc., Series B, 7.625% 2013 | 3,625 | 3,965 |
Ford Motor Credit Co. 7.375% 2009 | 29,000 | 28,037 |
Ford Motor Credit Co. 5.70% 2010 | 12,000 | 10,911 |
Ford Motor Credit Co. 7.875% 2010 | 26,575 | 25,885 |
Ford Motor Credit Co. 7.25% 2011 | 16,000 | 15,205 |
Cinemark USA, Inc. 9.00% 2013 | 56,718 | 58,845 |
Cinemark, Inc. 0%/9.75% 20142 | 26,750 | 18,859 |
J.C. Penney Co., Inc. 8.00% 2010 | 19,495 | 21,396 |
J.C. Penney Co., Inc. 9.00% 2012 | 22,104 | 26,138 |
J.C. Penney Co., Inc. 7.65% 2016 | 2,650 | 3,008 |
J.C. Penney Co., Inc. 7.95% 2017 | 9,301 | 10,836 |
J.C. Penney Co., Inc. 7.125% 2023 | 850 | 939 |
J.C. Penney Co., Inc. 8.125% 2027 | 5,100 | 5,400 |
J.C. Penney Co., Inc. 7.40% 2037 | 725 | 788 |
J.C. Penney Co., Inc. 7.625% 2097 | 5,500 | 5,665 |
Six Flags, Inc. 8.875% 2010 | 26,130 | 25,999 |
Six Flags, Inc. 9.75% 2013 | 21,975 | 21,755 |
Six Flags, Inc. 9.625% 2014 | 19,350 | 19,157 |
Tenneco Automotive Inc., Series B, 10.25% 2013 | 16,725 | 18,774 |
Tenneco Automotive Inc. 8.625% 2014 | 47,250 | 47,841 |
Technical Olympic USA, Inc. 9.00% 2010 | 24,861 | 25,855 |
Technical Olympic USA, Inc. 9.00% 2010 | 5,930 | 6,167 |
Technical Olympic USA, Inc. 7.50% 2011 | 10,600 | 9,991 |
Technical Olympic USA, Inc. 10.375% 2012 | 22,180 | 23,455 |
Telenet Communications NV 9.00% 2013 | €16,575 | 22,515 |
Telenet Group Holding NV 0%/11.50% 20142,3 | $47,145 | 38,777 |
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority 6.375% 2009 | 45,040 | 45,265 |
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority 8.00% 2012 | 7,775 | 8,242 |
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority 7.125% 2014 | 6,275 | 6,526 |
AMC Entertainment Inc. 9.50% 2011 | 8,282 | 7,909 |
AMC Entertainment Inc., Series B, 8.625% 2012 | 15,825 | 15,983 |
AMC Entertainment Inc. 9.875% 2012 | 18,150 | 17,560 |
AMC Entertainment Inc. 8.00% 2014 | 16,340 | 14,461 |
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. 7.00% 2007 | 10,293 | 10,679 |
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. 6.75% 2008 | 1,840 | 1,907 |
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. 8.00% 2010 | 12,850 | 13,974 |
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. 8.75% 2011 | 15,350 | 17,307 |
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. 6.875% 2013 | 9,500 | 9,904 |
William Lyon Homes, Inc. 7.625% 2012 | 11,250 | 10,716 |
William Lyon Homes, Inc. 10.75% 2013 | 20,395 | 22,078 |
William Lyon Homes, Inc. 7.50% 2014 | 22,260 | 20,813 |
Delphi Automotive Systems Corp. 6.55% 2006 | 9,650 | 7,141 |
Delphi Automotive Systems Corp. 6.50% 2009 | 33,825 | 23,508 |
Delphi Corp. 6.50% 2013 | 17,190 | 11,603 |
Delphi Automotive Systems Corp. 7.125% 2029 | 14,300 | 9,224 |
Delphi Trust II, trust preferred securities, 6.197% 20331 | 4,500 | 1,373 |
Young Broadcasting Inc. 10.00% 2011 | 52,060 | 49,457 |
Young Broadcasting Inc. 8.75% 2014 | 2,325 | 2,075 |
Kabel Deutschland GmbH 10.625% 20143 | 45,105 | 50,067 |
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 10.50% 2007 | 10,855 | 11,859 |
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 6.00% 2010 | 5,275 | 5,082 |
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 8.875% 2012 | 13,475 | 14,284 |
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 7.75% 2013 | 6,900 | 7,064 |
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 6.375% 2014 | 4,625 | 4,422 |
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 6.25% 20163 | 6,000 | 5,617 |
Grupo Posadas, SA de CV 8.75% 20113 | 44,095 | 47,402 |
Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc. 7.00% 2012 | 16,210 | 14,913 |
Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc. 8.375% 2014 | 35,770 | 30,226 |
Mirage Resorts, Inc. 6.75% 2007 | 5,700 | 5,828 |
Mandalay Resort Group, Series B, 10.25% 2007 | 5,000 | 5,400 |
Mirage Resorts, Inc. 6.75% 2008 | 4,800 | 4,902 |
MGM MIRAGE 6.00% 2009 | 18,500 | 18,361 |
Mandalay Resort Group 6.50% 2009 | 900 | 909 |
MGM MIRAGE 8.50% 2010 | 3,100 | 3,387 |
MGM MIRAGE 6.75% 2012 | 1,700 | 1,736 |
MGM MIRAGE 6.625% 20153 | 1,550 | 1,540 |
MGM MIRAGE 6.625% 20153 | 1,000 | 994 |
Quebecor Media Inc. 0%/13.75% 20112 | 1,520 | 1,552 |
Quebecor Media Inc. 11.125% 2011 | 33,328 | 36,577 |
Sun Media Corp. 7.625% 2013 | 4,250 | 4,468 |
D.R. Horton, Inc. 5.00% 2009 | 4,000 | 3,967 |
D.R. Horton, Inc. 8.00% 2009 | 18,270 | 19,684 |
D.R. Horton, Inc. 9.75% 2010 | 3,000 | 3,429 |
D.R. Horton, Inc. 7.875% 2011 | 2,030 | 2,227 |
Schuler Homes, Inc. 10.50% 2011 | 4,280 | 4,644 |
D.R. Horton, Inc. 6.875% 2013 | 4,075 | 4,290 |
Gaylord Entertainment Co. 8.00% 2013 | 20,509 | 21,637 |
Gaylord Entertainment Co. 6.75% 2014 | 13,600 | 13,226 |
WCI Communities, Inc. 10.625% 2011 | 21,925 | 23,405 |
WCI Communities, Inc. 9.125% 2012 | 8,450 | 8,746 |
WCI Communities, Inc. 6.625% 2015 | 1,925 | 1,752 |
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. 9.00% 20153,4 | 29,085 | 29,303 |
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. 10.375% 20153 | 4,000 | 4,000 |
NTL Cable PLC 8.75% 2014 | 21,325 | 22,125 |
NTL Cable PLC 8.75% 2014 | €4,500 | 5,680 |
NTL Cable PLC 9.75% 2014 | £3,000 | 5,342 |
Boyd Gaming Corp. 7.75% 2012 | $23,450 | 24,769 |
Boyd Gaming Corp. 8.75% 2012 | 4,500 | 4,871 |
Boyd Gaming Corp. 6.75% 2014 | 3,000 | 3,026 |
Emmis Operating Co. 6.875% 2012 | 21,750 | 21,777 |
Emmis Communications Corp. 9.745% 20121 | 10,550 | 10,682 |
Wynn Las Vegas, LLC and Wynn Las Vegas Capital Corp. 6.625% 2014 | 33,010 | 31,731 |
ITT Corp. 6.75% 2005 | 10,500 | 10,566 |
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. 7.375% 2007 | 3,875 | 4,015 |
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. 7.875% 2012 | 15,325 | 16,781 |
Dollarama Group LP 8.875% 20123 | 31,375 | 30,748 |
Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Resort Casino 10.125% 2012 | 28,180 | 29,589 |
Dillard’s, Inc. 6.69% 2007 | 1,075 | 1,094 |
Dillard Department Stores, Inc. 7.15% 2007 | 2,100 | 2,142 |
Dillard’s, Inc. 6.30% 2008 | 3,182 | 3,214 |
Dillard’s, Inc. 6.625% 2008 | 8,365 | 8,428 |
Dillard Department Stores, Inc. 9.125% 2011 | 8,230 | 9,012 |
Dillard’s, Inc. 6.625% 2018 | 3,000 | 2,805 |
Dillard’s, Inc. 7.00% 2028 | 3,000 | 2,775 |
American Media Operations, Inc., Series B, 10.25% 2009 | 13,190 | 12,893 |
American Media Operations, Inc. 8.875% 2011 | 17,615 | 15,677 |
Visteon Corp. 8.25% 2010 | 27,250 | 26,024 |
Visteon Corp. 7.00% 2014 | 2,615 | 2,282 |
Liberty Media Corp. 7.75% 2009 | 4,750 | 5,002 |
Liberty Media Corp. 7.875% 2009 | 2,500 | 2,643 |
Liberty Media Corp. 5.70% 2013 | 18,590 | 17,010 |
Liberty Media Corp. 8.25% 2030 | 3,075 | 2,960 |
Blockbuster Inc. 9.50% 20123 | 32,150 | 26,685 |
Carmike Cinemas, Inc. 7.50% 2014 | 30,025 | 26,197 |
Stoneridge, Inc. 11.50% 2012 | 24,442 | 26,031 |
Payless ShoeSource, Inc. 8.25% 2013 | 25,250 | 25,944 |
Argosy Gaming Co. 7.00% 2014 | 22,030 | 24,550 |
Warnaco, Inc. 8.875% 2013 | 22,375 | 24,277 |
Iesy Repository GmbH 10.125% 2015 | €4,750 | 6,110 |
Iesy Repository GmbH 10.375% 20153 | $16,425 | 17,452 |
Sealy Mattress Co. 8.25% 2014 | 23,000 | 23,230 |
Gray Communications Systems, Inc. 9.25% 2011 | 20,800 | 22,620 |
Dex Media East LLC, Dex Media East Finance Co., Series B, 9.875% 2009 | 5,000 | 5,462 |
Dex Media West LLC and Dex Media West Finance Co., Series B, 5.875% 2011 | 6,400 | 6,368 |
Dex Media, Inc., Series B, 0%/9.00% 20132 | 9,000 | 7,132 |
Dex Media, Inc., Series B, 8.00% 2013 | 3,075 | 3,175 |
DIRECTV Holdings LLC and DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. 8.375% 2013 | 18,759 | 20,565 |
AOL Time Warner Inc. 6.15% 2007 | 20,000 | 20,449 |
KB Home 6.375% 2011 | 4,000 | 4,029 |
KB Home 6.25% 2015 | 16,775 | 16,350 |
Buffets, Inc. 11.25% 2010 | 17,900 | 18,079 |
Adelphia Communications Corp. 10.25% 20065 | 9,955 | 7,416 |
Adelphia Communications Corp. 10.25% 20115 | 6,850 | 5,240 |
Century Communications Corp. 0% 20036 | 4,565 | 4,360 |
Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC and Atlantic Broadband Finance, Inc. 9.375% 2014 | 17,450 | 16,577 |
PETCO Animal Supplies, Inc. 10.75% 2011 | 14,685 | 16,227 |
NextMedia Operating, Inc. 10.75% 2011 | 15,000 | 16,144 |
CSC Holdings, Inc., Series B, 8.125% 2009 | 1,750 | 1,772 |
Cablevision Systems Corp., Series B, 8.00% 2012 | 14,540 | 14,176 |
Vidéotron Ltée 6.875% 2014 | 8,450 | 8,714 |
Vidéotron Ltée 6.375% 20153 | 7,235 | 7,217 |
Aztar Corp. 7.875% 2014 | 14,750 | 15,487 |
RH Donnelley Inc. 8.875% 20103 | 10,605 | 11,427 |
RH Donnelley Inc. 10.875% 20123 | 3,000 | 3,382 |
MDC Holdings, Inc. 7.00% 2012 | 10,000 | 10,770 |
MDC Holdings, Inc. 5.50% 2013 | 4,000 | 3,940 |
Harrah’s Operating Co., Inc. 7.875% 2005 | 10,875 | 10,970 |
Harrah’s Operating Co., Inc. 8.00% 2011 | 3,189 | 3,570 |
Toys “R” Us, Inc. 7.875% 2013 | 14,388 | 12,913 |
Toys “R” Us, Inc. 7.375% 2018 | 1,500 | 1,207 |
Regal Cinemas Corp., Series B, 9.375% 20127 | 13,300 | 14,071 |
Standard Pacific Corp. 5.125% 2009 | 8,625 | 8,151 |
Standard Pacific Corp. 6.50% 2010 | 2,000 | 1,945 |
Standard Pacific Corp. 9.25% 2012 | 1,000 | 1,075 |
Standard Pacific Corp. 6.25% 2014 | 3,000 | 2,794 |
Riddell Bell Holdings Inc. 8.375% 2012 | 14,000 | 13,860 |
Hilton Hotels Corp. 7.625% 2008 | 4,700 | 4,999 |
Hilton Hotels Corp. 7.20% 2009 | 5,885 | 6,363 |
Hilton Hotels Corp. 8.25% 2011 | 115 | 130 |
Hilton Hotels Corp. 7.625% 2012 | 2,050 | 2,311 |
EchoStar DBS Corp. 9.125% 2009 | 12,749 | 13,450 |
LBI Media, Inc. 10.125% 2012 | 12,140 | 13,142 |
Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. 8.375% 2013 | 12,170 | 12,809 |
Jostens IH Corp. 7.625% 2012 | 12,025 | 12,205 |
La Quinta Properties, Inc. 8.875% 2011 | 3,000 | 3,225 |
La Quinta Properties, Inc. 7.00% 2012 | 8,500 | 8,776 |
Radio One, Inc., Series B, 8.875% 2011 | 11,100 | 11,849 |
Fisher Communications, Inc. 8.625% 2014 | 9,565 | 10,258 |
Lenfest Communications, Inc. 7.625% 2008 | 6,750 | 7,145 |
Comcast Corp. 10.625% 2012 | 2,245 | 2,862 |
ArvinMeritor, Inc. 8.75% 2012 | 7,500 | 7,387 |
ArvinMeritor, Inc. 8.125% 20153 | 2,200 | 2,024 |
GSC Holdings Corp. and GameStop, Inc. 7.875% 20111,3 | 9,300 | 9,358 |
Lighthouse International Co. SA 8.00% 2014 | €7,300 | 9,313 |
Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. 6.50% 2011 | $8,225 | 8,389 |
WDAC Subsidiary Corp. 8.375% 20143 | 8,250 | 8,023 |
Seneca Gaming Corp. 7.25% 20123 | 5,300 | 5,459 |
Seneca Gaming Corp. 7.25% 2012 | 2,440 | 2,513 |
Warner Music Group 7.375% 2014 | 7,760 | 7,818 |
Loews Cineplex Entertainment Corp. 9.00% 2014 | 7,475 | 7,307 |
TRW Automotive Acquisition Corp. 9.375% 2013 | 6,697 | 7,300 |
Entercom Radio, LLC 7.625% 2014 | 6,500 | 6,744 |
Toll Corp. 8.25% 2011 | 5,500 | 5,857 |
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. 8.375% 2012 | 4,650 | 4,929 |
Dana Corp. 5.85% 2015 | 5,500 | 4,342 |
Mediacom LLC and Mediacom Capital Corp. 9.50% 2013 | 3,525 | 3,516 |
RBS-Zero Editora Jornalística SA 11.00% 20103 | 3,410 | 3,513 |
News America Inc. 6.75% 2038 | 2,990 | 3,265 |
Ameristar Casinos, Inc. 10.75% 2009 | 2,000 | 2,147 |
Boyds Collection, Ltd., Series B, 9.00% 20087 | 8,122 | 2,112 |
Key Plastics Holdings, Inc., Series B, 10.25% 20077,8 | 9,650 | 0 |
2,724,539 | ||
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 11.23% | ||
Qwest Capital Funding, Inc. 7.75% 2006 | 9,750 | 9,896 |
U S WEST Capital Funding, Inc. 6.375% 2008 | 3,770 | 3,704 |
Qwest Capital Funding, Inc. 7.00% 2009 | 18,625 | 18,299 |
Qwest Capital Funding, Inc. 7.90% 2010 | 16,835 | 16,793 |
Qwest Services Corp. 13.50% 2010 | 46,785 | 53,803 |
Qwest Communications International Inc. 7.25% 2011 | 24,375 | 23,857 |
Qwest Capital Funding, Inc. 7.25% 2011 | 14,980 | 14,343 |
Qwest Corp. 8.875% 2012 | 3,600 | 3,951 |
Qwest Services Corp. 14.00% 2014 | 25,375 | 30,894 |
U S WEST Capital Funding, Inc. 6.50% 2018 | 2,000 | 1,670 |
U S WEST Capital Funding, Inc. 6.875% 2028 | 13,064 | 10,810 |
Qwest Capital Funding, Inc. 7.75% 2031 | 3,655 | 3,171 |
Dobson Communications Corp. 10.875% 2010 | 10,975 | 11,647 |
Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. 8.443% 20111 | 4,000 | 4,165 |
American Cellular Corp., Series B, 10.00% 2011 | 57,575 | 63,045 |
Dobson Communications Corp. 8.10% 20121,3 | 19,850 | 19,676 |
Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. 9.875% 2012 | 20,375 | 22,413 |
Dobson Communications Corp. 8.875% 2013 | 37,250 | 37,436 |
US Unwired Inc., Series B, 10.00% 2012 | 17,150 | 19,808 |
Nextel Communications, Inc. 6.875% 2013 | 14,500 | 15,405 |
Nextel Communications, Inc. 7.375% 2015 | 88,378 | 94,693 |
Triton PCS, Inc. 8.75% 2011 | 35,425 | 29,137 |
Triton PCS, Inc. 9.375% 2011 | 49,810 | 41,093 |
Triton PCS, Inc. 8.50% 2013 | 55,625 | 53,261 |
American Tower Corp. 7.25% 2011 | 5,425 | 5,791 |
American Tower Corp. 7.125% 2012 | 62,860 | 66,317 |
American Tower Corp. 7.50% 2012 | 18,300 | 19,490 |
Centennial Communications Corp. and Centennial Cellular Operating Co. LLC 10.125% 2013 | 32,555 | 36,787 |
Centennial Communications Corp. and Centennial Cellular Operating Co. LLC and Centennial Puerto Rico Operations Corp. 8.125% 20141 | 18,175 | 19,311 |
Intelsat, Ltd. 8.695% 20121,3 | 18,150 | 18,558 |
Intelsat, Ltd. 8.25% 20133 | 22,605 | 22,859 |
Intelsat, Ltd. 8.625% 20153 | 12,400 | 12,710 |
Cincinnati Bell Inc. 7.25% 2013 | 38,425 | 41,019 |
NTELOS Inc. 9.03% 20121 | 40,250 | 40,049 |
SBA Communications Corp. 8.50% 2012 | 35,905 | 39,226 |
Rogers Wireless Inc. 7.25% 2012 | 11,725 | 12,458 |
Rogers Wireless Inc. 7.50% 2015 | 17,950 | 19,431 |
Rogers Cantel Inc. 9.75% 2016 | 1,625 | 1,970 |
MetroPCS, Inc. 10.75% 20071 | 18,000 | 18,900 |
MetroPCS, Inc. 8.25% 20111 | 10,500 | 10,815 |
Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. 9.75% 20133 | 20,350 | 20,859 |
Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. 12.50% 20153 | 6,800 | 6,902 |
Nextel Partners, Inc. 12.50% 2009 | 3,587 | 3,847 |
Nextel Partners, Inc. 8.125% 2011 | 16,000 | 17,360 |
Cell C Ltd. 8.625% 2012 | €14,700 | 18,513 |
Millicom International Cellular SA 10.00% 2013 | $16,550 | 17,171 |
AT&T Corp. 9.05% 20111 | 13,858 | 15,677 |
Valor Telecommunications Enterprises, LLC and Valor Telecommunications Enterprises Finance Corp. 7.75% 2015 | 15,780 | 15,386 |
UbiquiTel Operating Co. 9.875% 2011 | 10,125 | 11,289 |
iPCS, Inc. 11.50% 2012 | 6,500 | 7,540 |
AirGate PCS, Inc. 9.375% 20093 | 4,533 | 4,783 |
Alamosa (Delaware), Inc. 8.50% 2012 | 1,925 | 2,065 |
GT Group Telecom Inc. 13.25% 20105,7 | 11,000 | 0 |
1,130,053 | ||
MATERIALS — 10.71% | ||
Millennium America Inc. 9.25% 2008 | 30,825 | 33,291 |
Lyondell Chemical Co. 9.50% 2008 | 10,000 | 10,525 |
Equistar Chemicals, LP 10.125% 2008 | 15,650 | 16,902 |
Equistar Chemicals, LP and Equistar Funding Corp. 8.75% 2009 | 10,265 | 10,727 |
Equistar Chemicals, LP and Equistar Funding Corp. 10.625% 2011 | 44,875 | 49,138 |
Abitibi-Consolidated Co. of Canada 5.25% 2008 | 6,250 | 6,047 |
Abitibi-Consolidated Finance LP 7.875% 2009 | 14,500 | 14,464 |
Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. 8.55% 2010 | 16,045 | 16,406 |
Abitibi-Consolidated Co. of Canada 7.37% 20111 | 20,500 | 20,603 |
Abitibi-Consolidated Co. of Canada 6.00% 2013 | 14,740 | 13,008 |
Abitibi-Consolidated Co. of Canada 8.375% 2015 | 34,400 | 33,970 |
Smurfit Capital Funding PLC 6.75% 2005 | 3,175 | 3,191 |
JSG Funding PLC 9.625% 2012 | 6,517 | 6,582 |
JSG Funding PLC 7.75% 2015 | €18,250 | 19,306 |
JSG Funding PLC 7.75% 2015 | $3,500 | 2,992 |
JSG Holdings PLC 11.50% 20154 | €44,087 | 47,179 |
Smurfit Capital Funding PLC 7.50% 2025 | $ 1,325 | 1,212 |
Stone Container Corp. 9.25% 2008 | 6,425 | 6,586 |
Stone Container Corp. 9.75% 2011 | 6,075 | 6,196 |
Jefferson Smurfit Corp. (U.S.) 8.25% 2012 | 35,110 | 33,179 |
Stone Container Corp. 8.375% 2012 | 8,515 | 8,132 |
Jefferson Smurfit Corp. (U.S.) 7.50% 2013 | 25,400 | 22,987 |
Georgia-Pacific Corp. 7.50% 2006 | 2,625 | 2,668 |
Georgia-Pacific Corp. 7.375% 2008 | 15,200 | 15,998 |
Georgia-Pacific Corp. 8.875% 2010 | 9,925 | 11,116 |
Georgia-Pacific Corp. 8.125% 2011 | 8,475 | 9,407 |
Georgia-Pacific Corp. 9.50% 2011 | 2,525 | 2,992 |
Georgia-Pacific Corp. 9.375% 2013 | 21,420 | 23,990 |
Georgia-Pacific Corp. 7.70% 2015 | 600 | 665 |
Georgia-Pacific Corp. 8.875% 2031 | 4,000 | 4,751 |
Owens-Illinois, Inc. 8.10% 2007 | 250 | 257 |
Owens-Illinois, Inc. 7.35% 2008 | 2,440 | 2,501 |
Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc. 8.875% 2009 | 7,050 | 7,438 |
Owens-Illinois, Inc. 7.50% 2010 | 2,000 | 2,040 |
Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc. 7.75% 2011 | 15,985 | 16,704 |
Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc. 8.75% 2012 | 22,225 | 24,114 |
Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc. 8.25% 2013 | 2,900 | 3,030 |
Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc. 6.75% 2014 | €375 | 460 |
Graphic Packaging International, Inc. 8.50% 2011 | $33,825 | 33,318 |
Graphic Packaging International, Inc. 9.50% 2013 | 23,430 | 22,141 |
Rhodia 7.625% 2010 | 1,800 | 1,764 |
Rhodia SA 8.00% 2010 | €8,075 | 9,707 |
Rhodia 10.25% 2010 | $25,365 | 26,950 |
Rhodia 8.875% 2011 | 500 | 475 |
Rhodia SA 9.25% 2011 | €11,450 | 13,695 |
Building Materials Corp. of America, Series B, 8.00% 2007 | $ 3,150 | 3,260 |
Building Materials Corp. of America 8.00% 2008 | 10,245 | 10,450 |
Building Materials Corp. of America 7.75% 2014 | 34,360 | 33,501 |
Associated Materials Inc. 9.75% 2012 | 17,960 | 17,466 |
AMH Holdings, Inc. 0%/11.25% 20142 | 55,600 | 28,078 |
Gerdau Ameristeel Corp. and GUSAP Partners 10.375% 2011 | 30,775 | 34,391 |
Boise Cascade, LLC and Boise Cascade Finance Corp. 6.474% 20121 | 4,300 | 4,289 |
Boise Cascade, LLC and Boise Cascade Finance Corp. 7.125% 2014 | 26,450 | 25,194 |
United States Steel Corp. 10.75% 2008 | 4,571 | 5,165 |
United States Steel Corp. 9.75% 2010 | 20,923 | 23,068 |
Nalco Co. 7.75% 2011 | 20,050 | 20,601 |
Nalco Co. 8.875% 2013 | 925 | 954 |
Nalco Finance Holdings LLC and Nalco Finance Holdings Inc. 0%/9.00% 20142 | 2,800 | 2,079 |
Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd. 7.25% 2012 | 8,325 | 7,867 |
Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd. 6.75% 2014 | 11,955 | 10,879 |
Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd. 6.75% 2014 | 4,875 | 4,412 |
Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. 10.00% 2009 | 19,274 | 20,864 |
Earle M. Jorgensen Co. 9.75% 2012 | 17,840 | 19,446 |
Sino-Forest Corp. 9.125% 20113 | 16,810 | 18,239 |
Sino-Forest Corp. 9.125% 2011 | 825 | 895 |
Longview Fibre Co. 10.00% 2009 | 17,950 | 19,027 |
Domtar Inc. 7.125% 2015 | 19,135 | 17,640 |
Neenah Paper, Inc. 7.375% 2014 | 15,025 | 14,537 |
Luscar Coal Ltd. 9.75% 2011 | 12,715 | 13,796 |
Crompton Corp. 9.672% 20101 | 8,325 | 9,220 |
Crompton Corp. 9.875% 2012 | 2,550 | 2,917 |
Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. 10.625% 2011 | 511 | 560 |
Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. 7.50% 20143 | 3,700 | 3,607 |
Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. 7.625% 2014 | €5,700 | 7,075 |
Steel Dynamics, Inc. 9.50% 2009 | $ 9,800 | 10,461 |
Crystal US Holdings 3 LLC and Crystal US Sub 3 Corp., Series B, 0%/10.50% 20142 | 7,127 | 5,025 |
BCP Caylux Holdings Luxembourg SCA 9.625% 2014 | 3,575 | 3,995 |
Graham Packaging Co., LP and GPC Capital Corp. 9.875% 2014 | 9,000 | 8,685 |
AEP Industries Inc. 7.875% 2013 | 8,000 | 7,980 |
NewPage Corp. 9.943% 20121 | 6,000 | 5,700 |
Ispat Inland ULC 9.75% 2014 | 4,701 | 5,477 |
Allegheny Technologies, Inc. 8.375% 2011 | 5,000 | 5,400 |
Georgia Gulf Corp. 7.125% 2013 | 4,625 | 4,741 |
AK Steel Corp. 7.75% 2012 | 4,625 | 4,290 |
Airgas, Inc. 6.25% 2014 | 3,500 | 3,552 |
Norampac Inc. 6.75% 2013 | 3,500 | 3,500 |
Koppers Inc. 9.875% 2013 | 3,000 | 3,330 |
Novelis Inc. 7.25% 20153 | 2,750 | 2,612 |
Ball Corp. 6.875% 2012 | 2,500 | 2,562 |
Huntsman LLC 11.099% 20111 | 825 | 884 |
Huntsman LLC 11.50% 2012 | 500 | 574 |
PQ Corp. 7.50% 20133 | 975 | 951 |
1,078,000 | ||
INDUSTRIALS — 7.82% | ||
Allied Waste North America, Inc. 8.50% 2008 | 16,500 | 17,284 |
Allied Waste North America, Inc., Series B, 8.875% 2008 | 16,750 | 17,546 |
Allied Waste North America, Inc., Series B, 6.50% 2010 | 14,500 | 14,156 |
Allied Waste North America, Inc., Series B, 5.75% 2011 | 21,755 | 20,395 |
Allied Waste North America, Inc., Series B, 6.125% 2014 | 10,000 | 9,400 |
Allied Waste North America, Inc., Series B, 7.375% 2014 | 22,830 | 21,574 |
Continental Airlines, Inc. 8.00% 2005 | 18,315 | 18,269 |
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2000-2, Class A-1, 7.487% 20129 | 5,000 | 4,981 |
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2000-2, Class C, 8.312% 20129 | 4,979 | 4,290 |
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2001-1, Class B, 7.373% 20179 | 6,306 | 5,514 |
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 1997-4B, Class B, 6.90% 20189 | 7,756 | 6,639 |
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 1999-1, Class A, 6.545% 20209 | 10,659 | 10,458 |
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2001-1, Class A-1, 6.703% 20229 | 4,033 | 3,834 |
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2000-1, Class A-1, 8.048% 20229 | 12,834 | 12,749 |
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2000-1, Class B, 8.388% 20229 | 13,836 | 11,954 |
Horizon Lines, LLC and Horizon Lines Holding Corp. 9.00% 2012 | 36,745 | 39,547 |
H-Lines Finance Holding Corp. 0%/11.00% 20132,3 | 19,285 | 16,103 |
NTK Holdings Inc. 0%/10.75% 20142 | 49,460 | 27,945 |
THL Buildco, Inc. 8.50% 2014 | 28,795 | 26,635 |
Dyncorp International LLC 9.50% 20133 | 38,815 | 40,756 |
TFM, SA de CV 10.25% 2007 | 2,295 | 2,467 |
TFM, SA de CV 9.375% 20123 | 30,900 | 33,526 |
TFM, SA de CV 12.50% 2012 | 2,310 | 2,691 |
Accuride Corp. 8.50% 2015 | 35,995 | 35,455 |
Jacuzzi Brands, Inc. 9.625% 2010 | 33,155 | 35,310 |
DRS Technologies, Inc. 6.875% 2013 | 35,405 | 34,343 |
Terex Corp. 9.25% 2011 | 13,020 | 14,062 |
Terex Corp., Class B, 10.375% 2011 | 7,700 | 8,277 |
Terex Corp. 7.375% 2014 | 9,075 | 9,211 |
United Rentals (North America), Inc., Series B, 6.50% 2012 | 20,675 | 20,055 |
United Rentals (North America), Inc. 7.75% 2013 | 8,625 | 8,366 |
Bombardier Capital Inc., Series A, 6.125% 20063 | 16,570 | 16,674 |
Bombardier Inc. 6.75% 20123 | 6,600 | 6,187 |
Bombardier Inc. 6.30% 20143 | 2,800 | 2,492 |
ACIH, Inc. 0%/11.50% 20122,3 | 33,685 | 22,906 |
Goodman Global Holdings 6.41% 20121,3 | 10,325 | 10,144 |
Goodman Global Holdings 7.875% 20123 | 13,855 | 12,608 |
Williams Scotsman, Inc. 8.50% 20153 | 19,950 | 20,299 |
Standard Aero Holdings, Inc. 8.25% 2014 | 20,390 | 19,829 |
Argo-Tech Corp. 9.25% 2011 | 16,675 | 17,759 |
Northwest Airlines, Inc. 8.875% 20068 | 10,390 | 2,961 |
Northwest Airlines, Inc. 8.70% 20078 | 5,000 | 1,450 |
Northwest Airlines, Inc. 9.875% 20078 | 14,000 | 4,095 |
Northwest Airlines, Inc. 7.875% 20088 | 15,900 | 4,571 |
Northwest Airlines, Inc. 10.00% 20098 | 11,280 | 3,299 |
K&F Industries, Inc. 7.75% 2014 | 15,260 | 15,489 |
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 9.50% 2008 | 4,275 | 4,708 |
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 7.50% 2009 | 7,115 | 7,489 |
American Standard Inc. 8.25% 2009 | 5,190 | 5,741 |
American Standard Inc. 7.625% 2010 | 4,300 | 4,722 |
Delta Air Lines, Inc. 8.00% 20073,8 | 15,525 | 2,795 |
Delta Air Lines, Inc. 7.90% 20098 | 5,000 | 925 |
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Series 2000-1, Class B, 7.92% 20109 | 2,500 | 1,630 |
Delta Air Lines, Inc. 10.125% 20108 | 1,650 | 301 |
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Series 2001-1, Class A-1, 6.619% 20119 | 2,492 | 2,333 |
Delta Air Lines, Inc. 9.75% 20218 | 2,200 | 396 |
Delta Air Lines, Inc. 10.375% 20228 | 3,000 | 540 |
Ashtead Group PLC 8.625% 20153 | 7,850 | 8,292 |
Ahern Rentals, Inc. 9.25% 20133 | 7,805 | 8,020 |
American Airlines, Inc. 10.15% 2006 | 3,000 | 2,858 |
American Airlines, Inc., Series 2001-2, Class B, 8.608% 2012 | 2,500 | 2,341 |
American Airlines, Inc., Series 2001-2, Class A-2, 7.858% 20139 | 2,500 | 2,560 |
Esterline Technologies Corp. 7.75% 2013 | 7,000 | 7,420 |
Cummins Inc. 9.50% 2010 | 5,550 | 6,063 |
Builders FirstSource, Inc. 8.04% 20121,3 | 5,900 | 5,989 |
UCAR Finance Inc. 10.25% 2012 | 5,551 | 5,981 |
AGCO Corp. 6.875% 2014 | €3,750 | 4,761 |
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. 8.375% 2014 | $3,825 | 3,337 |
International Shipholding Corp., Series B, 7.75% 2007 | 1,950 | 1,974 |
United Air Lines, Inc. 9.00% 20036 | 3,000 | 457 |
United Air Lines, Inc., 1991 Equipment Trust Certificates, Series A, 10.11% 20065,9 | 1,907 | 786 |
786,974 | ||
UTILITIES — 6.01% | ||
Edison Mission Energy 10.00% 2008 | 29,150 | 32,429 |
Mission Energy Holding Co. 13.50% 2008 | 38,350 | 45,349 |
Edison Mission Energy 7.73% 2009 | 43,250 | 45,845 |
Edison Mission Energy 9.875% 2011 | 38,850 | 46,232 |
Midwest Generation, LLC, Series B, 8.56% 20169 | 23,985 | 26,398 |
Homer City Funding LLC 8.734% 20269 | 9,444 | 11,286 |
Midwest Generation, LLC and Midwest Finance Corp. 8.75% 2034 | 19,250 | 21,536 |
AES Corp. 9.50% 2009 | 28,507 | 31,215 |
AES Corp. 9.375% 2010 | 11,469 | 12,702 |
AES Corp. 8.875% 2011 | 5,375 | 5,859 |
AES Corp. 8.75% 20133 | 43,985 | 48,384 |
AES Gener SA 7.50% 2014 | 18,350 | 18,696 |
AES Corp. 9.00% 20153 | 15,150 | 16,703 |
AES Red Oak, LLC, Series B, 9.20% 20299 | 7,000 | 8,015 |
Dynegy Holdings Inc. 9.875% 20103 | 20,950 | 22,940 |
Dynegy Holdings Inc. 10.125% 20133 | 37,315 | 41,793 |
Nevada Power Co., General and Refunding Mortgage Bonds, Series A, 8.25% 2011 | 4,700 | 5,241 |
Sierra Pacific Power Co., General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series H, 6.25% 2012 | 3,000 | 3,067 |
Nevada Power Co., General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series I, 6.50% 2012 | 2,650 | 2,763 |
Nevada Power Co., General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series G, 9.00% 2013 | 19,217 | 21,439 |
Sierra Pacific Resources 8.625% 2014 | 15,500 | 17,162 |
Nevada Power Co., General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series L, 5.875% 2015 | 2,475 | 2,452 |
Sierra Pacific Resources 6.75% 20173 | 1,075 | 1,083 |
Drax Holdings Ltd., Series A-1, 7.173% 20151,3 | £4,006 | 7,116 |
Drax Holdings Ltd., Series A-2, unit, 8.673% 20151,3,10 | 4,746 | 33,222 |
Drax Holdings Ltd., Series B, 7.427% 20251,3,5 | 851 | 1,972 |
Texas Genco LLC and Texas Genco Financing Corp. 6.875% 20143 | $22,275 | 22,776 |
Enersis SA 7.375% 2014 | 16,800 | 17,785 |
PSEG Energy Holdings Inc. 8.625% 2008 | 15,999 | 16,799 |
FPL Energy American Wind, LLC 6.639% 20233,9 | 7,663 | 8,086 |
Electricidad de Caracas Finance BV 10.25% 20143 | 7,480 | 7,947 |
604,292 | ||
CONSUMER STAPLES — 5.37% | ||
Burns Philp Capital Pty Ltd. and Burns Philp Capital (U.S.) Inc., Series B, 9.50% 2010 | 16,750 | 18,593 |
Burns Philp Capital Pty Ltd. and Burns Philp Capital (U.S.) Inc., Series B, 10.75% 2011 | 17,825 | 20,053 |
Burns Philp Capital Pty Ltd., Series B, 9.75% 2012 | 60,322 | 67,862 |
Rite Aid Corp. 6.125% 20083 | 5,800 | 5,539 |
Rite Aid Corp. 8.125% 2010 | 2,000 | 2,050 |
Rite Aid Corp. 9.50% 2011 | 7,975 | 8,493 |
Rite Aid Corp. 6.875% 2013 | 30,300 | 25,831 |
Rite Aid Corp. 9.25% 2013 | 12,750 | 12,240 |
Rite Aid Corp. 7.50% 2015 | 8,000 | 7,680 |
Rite Aid Corp. 7.70% 2027 | 11,780 | 9,483 |
Rite Aid Corp. 6.875% 2028 | 8,000 | 6,040 |
Koninklijke Ahold NV 5.875% 2008 | €4,000 | 5,139 |
Ahold Finance U.S.A., Inc. 6.25% 2009 | $28,460 | 28,887 |
Ahold Finance U.S.A., Inc. 8.25% 2010 | 11,000 | 12,045 |
Ahold Lease Pass Through Trust, Series 2001-A-1, 7.82% 20209 | 1,864 | 2,023 |
Ahold Lease Pass Through Trust, Series 2001-A-2, 8.62% 20259 | 7,500 | 8,405 |
Ahold Finance U.S.A., Inc. 6.875% 2029 | 1,075 | 1,016 |
Spectrum Brands, Inc. 7.375% 2015 | 40,645 | 36,784 |
Delhaize America, Inc. 8.125% 2011 | 33,645 | 36,633 |
Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc. 7.625% 2012 | 2,150 | 2,198 |
Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc. 8.50% 2014 | 33,000 | 33,000 |
Pathmark Stores, Inc. 8.75% 2012 | 29,810 | 28,841 |
Playtex Products, Inc. 8.00% 2011 | 5,000 | 5,262 |
Playtex Products, Inc. 9.375% 2011 | 21,660 | 22,716 |
Stater Bros. Holdings Inc. 7.37% 20101 | 6,450 | 6,385 |
Stater Bros. Holdings Inc. 8.125% 2012 | 21,325 | 21,165 |
Petro Stopping Centers, LP and Petro Financial Corp. 9.00% 2012 | 18,450 | 18,265 |
Petro Stopping Centers, LP 9.00% 20123 | 8,390 | 8,306 |
Gold Kist Inc. 10.25% 2014 | 21,141 | 23,995 |
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. 8.875% 20088 | 18,675 | 12,232 |
Winn-Dixie Pass Through Trust, Series 1999-1, Class A-1, 5.24% 20173,8,9 | 3,045 | 2,301 |
Del Monte Corp., Series B, 8.625% 2012 | 10,550 | 11,394 |
Elizabeth Arden, Inc. 7.75% 2014 | 10,383 | 10,617 |
Constellation Brands, Inc. 8.125% 2012 | 5,500 | 5,837 |
Duane Reade Inc. 8.37% 20101 | 6,000 | 5,760 |
WH Holdings (Cayman Islands) Ltd. and WH Capital Corp. 9.50% 2011 | 5,280 | 5,716 |
Dole Food Co., Inc. 8.875% 2011 | 1,855 | 1,934 |
540,720 | ||
ENERGY — 4.39% | ||
Port Arthur Finance Corp. 12.50% 20099 | 1,386 | 1,587 |
Premcor Refining Group Inc. 9.25% 2010 | 12,675 | 13,847 |
Premcor Refining Group Inc. 6.125% 2011 | 4,000 | 4,200 |
Premcor Refining Group Inc. 6.75% 2011 | 24,675 | 26,526 |
Premcor Refining Group Inc. 9.50% 2013 | 22,350 | 25,311 |
Premcor Refining Group Inc. 6.75% 2014 | 5,000 | 5,350 |
Premcor Refining Group Inc. 7.50% 2015 | 29,775 | 32,008 |
General Maritime Corp. 10.00% 2013 | 42,925 | 47,432 |
Newfield Exploration Co., Series B, 7.45% 2007 | 1,750 | 1,820 |
Newfield Exploration Co. 7.625% 2011 | 3,500 | 3,806 |
Newfield Exploration Co. 8.375% 2012 | 23,500 | 25,497 |
Newfield Exploration Co. 6.625% 2014 | 14,575 | 15,231 |
Petrozuata Finance, Inc., Series B, 8.22% 20173,9 | 39,405 | 37,829 |
Petrozuata Finance, Inc., Series B, 8.22% 20179 | 5,985 | 5,746 |
Williams Companies, Inc. and Credit Linked Certificate Trust 6.75% 20093 | 2,000 | 2,045 |
Williams Companies, Inc. 7.125% 2011 | 1,900 | 2,000 |
Williams Companies, Inc. 8.125% 2012 | 8,000 | 8,780 |
Williams Companies, Inc. 8.75% 2032 | 16,470 | 19,517 |
American Commercial Lines LLC and ACL Finance Corp. 9.50% 2015 | 26,265 | 28,498 |
Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Ltd., First Preferred Ship Mortgage Notes, 9.00% 2014 | 30,130 | 27,908 |
Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. 8.25% 2013 | 15,985 | 17,264 |
Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. 8.75% 2013 | 8,055 | 9,163 |
Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. 7.50% 2024 | 1,150 | 1,147 |
Teekay Shipping Corp. 8.875% 2011 | 20,795 | 23,810 |
Pogo Producing Co. 6.875% 20173 | 19,975 | 20,350 |
Encore Acquisition Co. 6.00% 20153 | 17,900 | 17,542 |
Peabody Energy Corp., Series B, 6.875% 2013 | 7,000 | 7,350 |
Peabody Energy Corp. 5.875% 2016 | 4,000 | 3,995 |
Pemex Project Funding Master Trust 7.875% 2009 | 1,400 | 1,519 |
Pemex Project Funding Master Trust 8.625% 2022 | 1,170 | 1,433 |
Whiting Petroleum Corp. 7.25% 2013 | 2,000 | 2,045 |
Tengizchevroil Finance Co. S.àr.l., Series A, 6.124% 20143,9 | 750 | 771 |
441,327 | ||
HEALTH CARE — 4.35% | ||
Tenet Healthcare Corp. 6.375% 2011 | 30,260 | 28,369 |
Tenet Healthcare Corp. 7.375% 2013 | 7,640 | 7,277 |
Tenet Healthcare Corp. 9.875% 2014 | 38,700 | 40,635 |
Tenet Healthcare Corp. 9.25% 20153 | 19,400 | 19,691 |
Quintiles Transnational Corp. 10.00% 2013 | 47,775 | 53,986 |
Pharma Services Intermediate Holding Corp. 0%/11.50% 20142 | 28,115 | 20,946 |
Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. 7.00% 2007 | 7,755 | 7,965 |
Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. 7.25% 2008 | 1,000 | 1,040 |
HCA Inc. 5.50% 2009 | 22,750 | 22,397 |
HCA — The Healthcare Co. 8.75% 2010 | 6,660 | 7,389 |
HCA — The Healthcare Co. 7.875% 2011 | 1,250 | 1,346 |
HCA Inc. 6.30% 2012 | 1,875 | 1,873 |
Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. 7.69% 2025 | 1,000 | 1,010 |
Concentra Operating Corp. 9.50% 2010 | 26,250 | 27,628 |
Concentra Operating Corp. 9.125% 2012 | 11,790 | 12,321 |
HealthSouth Corp. 7.375% 2006 | 1,500 | 1,496 |
HealthSouth Corp. 7.00% 2008 | 1,000 | 982 |
HealthSouth Corp. 8.375% 2011 | 12,220 | 11,701 |
HealthSouth Corp. 7.625% 2012 | 25,345 | 23,824 |
Warner Chilcott Corp. 8.75% 20153 | 38,150 | 36,815 |
Select Medical Corp. 7.625% 2015 | 8,000 | 7,700 |
Select Medical Holdings Corp. 9.933% 20151,3 | 22,500 | 22,500 |
Team Health, Inc. 9.00% 2012 | 14,295 | 15,224 |
MedCath Holdings Corp. 9.875% 2012 | 13,575 | 14,865 |
American Medical Response, Inc. and EmCare Holdings, Inc. 10.00% 20153 | 13,005 | 14,110 |
Health Net, Inc. 9.875% 20111 | 10,660 | 12,562 |
Triad Hospitals, Inc. 7.00% 2012 | 8,925 | 9,215 |
Medical Device Manufacturing, Inc., Series B, 10.00% 2012 | 7,250 | 7,902 |
Universal Hospital Services, Inc., Series B, 10.125% 2011 | 5,000 | 5,150 |
437,919 | ||
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY — 4.01% | ||
Sanmina-SCI Corp. 10.375% 2010 | 51,750 | 57,313 |
Sanmina-SCI Corp. 6.75% 2013 | 11,500 | 10,983 |
Electronic Data Systems Corp. 7.125% 2009 | 16,800 | 18,009 |
Electronic Data Systems Corp., Series B, 6.50% 20131 | 41,040 | 42,104 |
Celestica Inc. 7.875% 2011 | 19,695 | 20,187 |
Celestica Inc. 7.625% 2013 | 29,880 | 29,955 |
Amkor Technology, Inc. 9.25% 2008 | 15,620 | 14,722 |
Amkor Technology, Inc. 10.50% 2009 | 9,640 | 8,242 |
Amkor Technology, Inc. 7.125% 2011 | 17,985 | 15,602 |
Amkor Technology, Inc. 7.75% 2013 | 8,675 | 7,461 |
Semiconductor Note Participation Trust 10.00% 20113 | 32,043 | 31,969 |
Xerox Corp. 9.75% 2009 | 2,000 | 2,250 |
Xerox Corp. 7.125% 2010 | 22,000 | 23,265 |
Xerox Corp. 7.625% 2013 | 5,000 | 5,338 |
Nortel Networks Ltd. 6.125% 2006 | 24,575 | 24,698 |
SunGard Data Systems Inc. 9.125% 20133 | 9,025 | 9,397 |
SunGard Data Systems Inc. 4.875% 2014 | 4,500 | 3,971 |
SunGard Data Systems Inc. 10.25% 20153 | 6,000 | 6,105 |
Jabil Circuit, Inc. 5.875% 2010 | 14,750 | 15,124 |
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 6.875% 2011 | 9,875 | 10,418 |
MagnaChip Semiconductor SA and MagnaChip Semiconductor Finance Co. 6.875% 2011 | 4,000 | 3,860 |
MagnaChip Semiconductor SA and MagnaChip Semiconductor Finance Co. 7.12% 20111 | 5,175 | 5,149 |
Solectron Corp., Series B, 7.375% 2006 | 8,895 | 8,984 |
Iron Mountain Inc. 7.75% 2015 | 8,410 | 8,578 |
Motorola, Inc. 7.50% 2025 | 2,000 | 2,415 |
Motorola, Inc. 5.22% 2097 | 4,550 | 3,776 |
Lucent Technologies Inc. 7.25% 2006 | 6,000 | 6,135 |
Viasystems, Inc. 10.50% 2011 | 5,000 | 4,937 |
Hyundai Semiconductor America, Inc. 8.625% 20073 | 2,600 | 2,686 |
Exodus Communications, Inc. 11.625% 20105,7 | 3,824 | 0 |
403,633 | ||
FINANCIALS — 2.93% | ||
Host Marriott, LP, Series G, 9.25% 2007 | 1,725 | 1,826 |
Host Marriott, LP, Series I, 9.50% 2007 | 2,050 | 2,155 |
Host Marriott, LP, Series M, 7.00% 2012 | 20,875 | 21,267 |
Host Marriott, LP, Series K, 7.125% 2013 | 17,800 | 18,267 |
Host Marriott, LP, Series O, 6.375% 2015 | 7,120 | 6,942 |
LaBranche & Co Inc. 9.50% 2009 | 25,705 | 27,376 |
LaBranche & Co Inc. 11.00% 2012 | 6,000 | 6,660 |
Rouse Co. 3.625% 2009 | 12,415 | 11,614 |
Rouse Co. 7.20% 2012 | 12,370 | 13,078 |
Rouse Co. 5.375% 2013 | 3,715 | 3,543 |
Lazard LLC 7.125% 20153 | 27,840 | 27,691 |
Kazkommerts International BV 8.50% 20133 | 7,000 | 7,691 |
Kazkommerts International BV 8.50% 2013 | 1,500 | 1,648 |
Kazkommerts International BV 7.875% 20143 | 10,000 | 10,588 |
MBNA Corp. 5.625% 2007 | 10,000 | 10,203 |
MBNA Capital A, Series A, 8.278% 2026 | 7,500 | 8,059 |
iStar Financial, Inc. 7.00% 2008 | 2,375 | 2,479 |
iStar Financial, Inc. 8.75% 2008 | 686 | 752 |
iStar Financial, Inc., Series B, 4.875% 2009 | 2,000 | 1,982 |
iStar Financial, Inc. 6.00% 2010 | 9,600 | 9,865 |
iStar Financial, Inc., Series B, 5.70% 2014 | 2,500 | 2,507 |
Providian Financial Corp., Series A, 9.525% 20273 | 15,000 | 16,425 |
Crescent Real Estate LP 7.50% 2007 | 12,320 | 12,720 |
Crescent Real Estate Equities LP 9.25% 2009 | 975 | 1,042 |
Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd. 7.75% 2012 | 13,960 | 13,471 |
TuranAlem Finance BV 7.875% 2010 | 10,000 | 10,575 |
TuranAlem Finance BV 8.50% 20153 | 2,280 | 2,425 |
Advanta Capital Trust I, Series B, 8.99% 2026 | 12,000 | 12,180 |
FelCor Lodging LP 9.00% 20111 | 11,055 | 12,078 |
Chevy Chase Bank, FSB 6.875% 2013 | 5,500 | 5,679 |
Sovereign Capital Trust I 9.00% 2027 | 5,000 | 5,409 |
BankUnited Capital Trust, BankUnited Financial Corp. 10.25% 2026 | 4,500 | 4,905 |
Resona Bank, Ltd. 7.191% (undated)1,3 | 1,000 | 1,037 |
Korea First Bank 7.267% 20341,3 | 870 | 959 |
295,098 | ||
NON-U.S. GOVERNMENT BONDS & NOTES — 4.65% | ||
Argentina (Republic of) 3.504% 20121 | $36,580 | 29,098 |
Argentina (Republic of) 6.501% 20334,11 | ARS 95,591 | 36,716 |
Argentina (Republic of) 0.72% 203811 | 118,777 | 18,002 |
Brazil (Federal Republic of), Debt Conversion Bond, Series L, Bearer, 4.313% 20121 | $ 5,353 | 5,296 |
Brazil (Federal Republic of) Global 10.25% 2013 | 26,500 | 31,601 |
Brazil (Federal Republic of) Global 10.50% 2014 | 3,000 | 3,639 |
Brazil (Federal Republic of) Global 8.00% 2018 | 6,820 | 7,239 |
Brazil (Federal Republic of) Global 8.875% 2024 | 1,895 | 2,027 |
Brazil (Federal Republic of) Global 11.00% 2040 | 27,610 | 33,884 |
Russian Federation 8.25% 2010 | 6,000 | 6,513 |
Russian Federation 8.25% 20103 | 5,000 | 5,428 |
Russian Federation 12.75% 2028 | 8,000 | 15,080 |
Russian Federation 5.00%/7.50% 20302 | 32,365 | 37,220 |
Turkey (Republic of) Treasury Bill 0% 2005 | TRY15,000 | 10,958 |
Turkey (Republic of) Treasury Bill 0% 2006 | 10,000 | 6,673 |
Turkey (Republic of) 20.00% 2007 | 23,983 | 19,388 |
Turkey (Republic of) 15.00% 2010 | 10,262 | 8,049 |
Panama (Republic of) Global 10.75% 2020 | $ 415 | 580 |
Panama (Republic of) Global 9.375% 2023 | 18,708 | 23,712 |
Panama (Republic of) Global 8.875% 2027 | 6,500 | 7,946 |
Panama (Republic of) 8.125% 2034 | 3,000 | 3,420 |
United Mexican States Government, Series M10, 10.50% 2011 | MXP12,320 | $ 1,290 |
United Mexican States Government Eurobonds, Global 7.50% 2012 | $1,450 | 1,631 |
United Mexican States Government Global 6.375% 2013 | 6,000 | 6,399 |
United Mexican States Government Global 11.375% 2016 | 6,751 | 9,975 |
United Mexican States Government Global 8.125% 2019 | 1,663 | 2,021 |
United Mexican States Government, Series M20, 10.00% 2024 | MXP70,000 | 7,229 |
United Mexican States Government Global 8.30% 2031 | $ 3,020 | 3,783 |
United Mexican States Government Global 7.50% 2033 | 2,285 | 2,656 |
Peru (Republic of) 9.125% 2012 | 4,909 | 5,915 |
Peru (Republic of) 9.875% 2015 | 13,500 | 17,314 |
Peru (Republic of) 8.375% 2016 | 2,500 | 2,938 |
Peru (Republic of) Past Due Interest Eurobond 5.00% 20171 | 357 | 351 |
Peru (Republic of) 7.35% 2025 | 500 | 533 |
Dominican Republic 9.50% 20114 | 5,368 | 5,932 |
Dominican Republic 9.50% 20113,4 | 3,279 | 3,623 |
Dominican Republic 9.04% 20183,4 | 8,607 | 9,597 |
Dominican Republic 9.04% 20184 | 4,688 | 5,227 |
Dominican Republic 4.375% 20241 | 500 | 471 |
Colombia (Republic of) Global 10.00% 2012 | 1,500 | 1,815 |
Colombia (Republic of) Global 10.75% 2013 | 8,550 | 10,786 |
Colombia (Republic of) Global 11.75% 2020 | 4,000 | 5,584 |
Colombia (Republic of) Global 10.375% 2033 | 700 | 917 |
Venezuela (Republic of) 10.75% 2013 | 6,000 | 7,500 |
Venezuela (Republic of) 9.25% 2027 | 4,630 | 5,489 |
Venezuela (Republic of) 9.375% 2034 | 3,000 | 3,559 |
Aries Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH, Series C, 9.60% 20143 | 4,000 | 5,290 |
Aries Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH, Series C, 9.60% 2014 | 4,000 | 5,290 |
State of Qatar 9.75% 2030 | 3,500 | 5,390 |
Ecuador (Republic of) 9.00% 20301 | 5,550 | 5,264 |
Guatemala (Republic of) 10.25% 20113 | 1,000 | 1,226 |
Guatemala (Republic of) 10.25% 2011 | 1,000 | 1,226 |
Guatemala (Republic of) 9.25% 20133 | 1,500 | 1,802 |
Banque Centrale de Tunisie 7.375% 2012 | 3,500 | 3,972 |
El Salvador (Republic of) 7.75% 20233 | 2,775 | 3,115 |
Lebanon (Republic of) 11.625% 2016 | 195 | 230 |
Jamaican Government 9.00% 2015 | 150 | 156 |
467,965 | ||
U.S. TREASURY BONDS & NOTES — 0.55% | ||
U.S. Treasury 5.75% 200512 | 14,000 | 14,035 |
U.S. Treasury 3.25% 200712 | 5,000 | 4,919 |
U.S. Treasury 6.625% 200712 | 25,000 | 25,971 |
U.S. Treasury 4.75% 200812 | 10,000 | 10,162 |
55,087 | ||
MUNICIPALS — 0.34% | ||
State of Wisconsin, Badger Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Asset-backed Bonds, 6.125% 2027 | 24,325 | 26,022 |
State of Louisiana, Tobacco Settlement Authority, Asset-backed Bonds, Series 2001-B, 5.50% 2030 | 4,500 | 4,694 |
State of New Jersey, Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Tobacco Settlement Asset-backed Bonds, Series 2003, 4.375% 2019 | 3,110 | 3,151 |
33,867 | ||
ASSET-BACKED OBLIGATIONS9— 0.22% | ||
Consumer Credit Reference Index Securities Program Trust, Series 2002-2A, Class FX, 10.421% 20073 | 16,500 | 17,269 |
Mediterranean Re PLC, Class B, 9.652% 20051,3 | 5,000 | 5,035 |
22,304 | ||
Total bonds & notes (cost: $8,837,898,000) | 9,021,778 | |
Shares or | Market value | |
Convertible securities — 2.63% | principal amount | (000) |
CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY — 1.16% | ||
Amazon.com, Inc. 6.875% PEACS convertible subordinated notes 2010 | €42,233,000 | $ 51,530 |
Amazon.com, Inc. 4.75% convertible subordinated debentures 2009 | $ 8,825,000 | 8,670 |
General Motors Corp., Series B, 5.25% convertible senior debentures 2032 | $35,000,000 | 24,192 |
Six Flags, Inc. 7.25% PIERS convertible preferred 2009 | 1,000,000 | 23,900 |
Ford Motor Co. Capital Trust II 6.50% cumulative convertible trust preferred 2032 | 160,600 | 5,854 |
Gray Communications Systems, Inc., Series C, 8.00% convertible preferred 20123,4,7 | 300 | 3,028 |
117,174 | ||
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY — 0.72% | ||
Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. 5.00% convertible notes 2008 | $17,850,000 | 17,672 |
Micron Technology, Inc. 2.50% convertible notes 2010 | $ 5,000,000 | 5,888 |
Micron Technology, Inc. 2.50% convertible notes 20103 | $ 8,000,000 | 9,420 |
Conexant Systems, Inc. 4.00% convertible subordinated notes 2007 | $14,700,000 | 14,259 |
SCI Systems, Inc. 3.00% convertible subordinated debentures 2007 | $12,000,000 | 11,610 |
Amkor Technology, Inc. 5.75% convertible notes 2006 | $11,012,200 | 10,530 |
LSI Logic Corp. 4.00% convertible notes 2006 | $ 3,000,000 | 2,996 |
72,375 | ||
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.26% | ||
American Tower Corp. 5.00% convertible debentures 2010 | $25,925,000 | 25,893 |
UTILITIES — 0.21% | ||
AES Trust VII 6.00% convertible preferred 2008 | 439,925 | 21,402 |
INDUSTRIALS — 0.17% | ||
Cummins Capital Trust I 7.00% QUIPS convertible preferred 20313 | 180,000 | 16,807 |
FINANCIALS — 0.11% | ||
Equity Office Properties Trust, Series B, 5.25% convertible preferred 2008 | 200,000 | 10,248 |
Crescent Real Estate Equities Co., Series A, 6.75% convertible preferred | 37,200 | 824 |
11,072 | ||
Total convertible securities (cost: $219,305,000) | 264,723 | |
Warrants — 0.12% | Shares | |
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.12% | ||
American Tower Corp., warrants, expire 20083,13 | 38,250 | 12,661 |
XO Communications, Inc., Series A, warrants, expire 201013 | 37,767 | 13 |
XO Communications, Inc., Series B, warrants, expire 201013 | 28,325 | 8 |
XO Communications, Inc., Series C, warrants, expire 201013 | 28,325 | 7 |
KMC Telecom Holdings, Inc., warrants, expire 20083,7,13 | 22,500 | 0 |
GT Group Telecom Inc., warrants, expire 20103,7,13 | 11,000 | 0 |
Allegiance Telecom, Inc., warrants, expire 20083,7,13 | 5,000 | 0 |
Total warrants (cost: $1,126,000) | 12,689 | |
Market value | ||
Preferred stocks — 1.98% | Shares | (000) |
FINANCIALS — 1.95% | ||
Fuji JGB Investment LLC, Series A, 9.87% noncumulative preferred1,3 | 52,248,000 | $ 58,327 |
IBJ Preferred Capital Co. LLC, Series A, 8.79% noncumulative preferred1,3 | 30,925,000 | 33,682 |
Swire Pacific Capital Ltd. 8.84% cumulative guaranteed perpetual capital securities3 | 1,125,000 | 30,832 |
Swire Pacific Offshore Financing Ltd. 9.33% cumulative guaranteed perpetual preferred capital securities3 | 546,648 | 14,162 |
Tokai Preferred Capital Co. LLC, Series A, 9.98% noncumulative preferred1,3 | 28,963,000 | 32,583 |
SB Treasury Co. LLC, Series A, 9.40% noncumulative preferred1,3 | 13,297,000 | 14,683 |
Fannie Mae, Series O, 7.00% preferred3 | 150,000 | 8,259 |
Chevy Chase Preferred Capital Corp., Series A, 10.375% exchangeable preferred | 55,994 | 3,167 |
195,695 | ||
CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY — 0.03% | ||
Delphi Corp., Series A, 8.25% cumulative trust preferred 2033 | 312,210 | 2,919 |
Adelphia Communications Corp., Series B, 13.00% preferred 200913 | 36,196 | 16 |
2,935 | ||
CONSUMER STAPLES — 0.00% | ||
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. 9.375% QUIBS preferred 2039 | 18,500 | 460 |
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY — 0.00% | ||
ZiLOG, Inc. — MOD III Inc., units7,13,14 | 1,868 | 0 |
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.00% | ||
XO Communications, Inc. 14.00% preferred 20094,7,13 | 40 | 0 |
Total preferred stocks (cost: $169,497,000) | 199,090 | |
Common stocks — 0.96% | ||
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.59% | ||
Dobson Communications Corp., Class A3,13 | 3,435,685 | 26,386 |
Sprint Nextel Corp. | 777,508 | 18,489 |
SBC Communications Inc. | 500,000 | 11,985 |
VersaTel Telecom International NV13 | 779,280 | 2,061 |
Cincinnati Bell Inc.13 | 70,740 | 312 |
XO Communications, Inc.13 | 18,882 | 48 |
59,281 | ||
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY — 0.15% | ||
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.13 | 500,000 | 7,430 |
Amkor Technology, Inc.13 | 1,200,000 | 5,256 |
ZiLOG, Inc.13,14 | 1,140,500 | 3,022 |
15,708 | ||
CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY — 0.09% | ||
Emmis Communications Corp., Class A13 | 201,000 | 4,440 |
Viacom Inc., Class B, nonvoting | 63,225 | 2,087 |
Clear Channel Communications, Inc. | 51,012 | 1,678 |
Radio One, Inc., Class D, nonvoting13 | 44,000 | 579 |
Radio One, Inc., Class A13 | 22,000 | 289 |
9,073 | ||
FINANCIALS — 0.09% | ||
Equity Office Properties Trust | 150,000 | 4,907 |
Federal Realty Investment Trust | 60,448 | 3,683 |
8,590 | ||
INDUSTRIALS — 0.04% | ||
DigitalGlobe Inc.3,7,13 | 3,064,647 | $ 3,065 |
Delta Air Lines, Inc.3,13 | 766,165 | 574 |
3,639 | ||
HEALTH CARE — 0.00% | ||
Clarent Hospital Corp.7,13,14 | 576,849 | 289 |
Total common stocks (cost: $114,385,000) | 96,580 | |
Principal amount | ||
Short-term securities — 3.28% | (000) | |
Procter & Gamble Co. 3.69% due 10/24/20053 | $74,000 | 73,818 |
Procter & Gamble Co. 3.57% due 10/11/20053 | 21,600 | 21,576 |
DuPont (E.I.) de Nemours & Co. 3.55% due 10/18/2005 | 40,000 | 39,929 |
Ranger Funding Co. LLC 3.75% due 10/19/20053 | 31,200 | 31,138 |
U.S. Treasury Bills 3.44% due 12/1/200512 | 30,600 | 30,435 |
Variable Funding Capital Corp. 3.73% due 10/17/20053 | 16,200 | 16,171 |
Variable Funding Capital Corp. 3.57% due 10/3/20053 | 14,000 | 13,996 |
Freddie Mac 3.63% due 11/22/200512 | 26,100 | 25,958 |
Coca-Cola Co. 3.48%-3.53% due 10/4/2005 | 22,623 | 22,614 |
CAFCO, LLC 3.69% due 10/19/20053 | 18,100 | 18,065 |
Pfizer Inc 3.71% due 11/17/20053,12 | 16,200 | 16,123 |
Clipper Receivables Co., LLC 3.65% due 11/14/20053,12 | 10,300 | 10,252 |
General Electric Capital Corp. 3.85% due 10/3/2005 | 9,700 | 9,697 |
Total short-term securities (cost: $329,756,000) | 329,772 | |
Total investment securities (cost: $9,671,967,000) | 9,924,632 | |
Other assets less liabilities | 137,789 | |
Net assets | $10,062,421 |
1Coupon rate may change periodically.
2Step bond; coupon rate will increase at a later date.
3Purchased in a private placement transaction; resale may be limited to qualified institutional buyers; resale to the public may require registration. The total value of all such restricted securities was $1,739,799,000, which represented 17.29% of the net assets of the fund.
4Payment in kind; the issuer has the option of paying additional securities in lieu of cash.
5Company not making scheduled interest payments; bankruptcy proceedings pending.
6Company did not make principal payment upon scheduled maturity date; reorganization pending.
7Valued under fair value procedures adopted by authority of the Board of Trustees.
8Scheduled interest payments not made; reorganization pending.
9Pass-through securities backed by a pool of mortgages or other loans on which principal payments are periodically made. Therefore, the effective maturities are shorter than the stated maturities.
10This unit also contains 895,000 par of Drax Holdings Ltd., Class A-3, 9.673% 2020 and 895,000 shares of Drax Holdings Ltd. common stock.
11Index-linked bond whose principal amount moves with a government retail price index.
12This security, or a portion of this security, has been segregated to cover funding requirements on investment transactions settling in the future.
13Security did not produce income during the last 12 months.
14 Represents an affiliated company as defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON DETAILED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
American High-Income Trust
We have audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the financial statements of American High-Income Trust, (the “Fund”) as of September 30, 2005, and for the year then ended and have issued our report thereon dated November 9, 2005, which report and financial statements are included in Item 1 of this Certified Shareholder Report on Form N-CSR. Our audit also included the Fund’s investment portfolio (the “Schedule”) as of September 30, 2005 appearing in Item 6 of this Form N-CSR. This Schedule is the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, the Schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole of the Fund referred to above, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
November 9, 2005
Costa Mesa, California
ITEM 7 - Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable to this Registrant, insofar as the Registrant is not a closed-end management investment company.
ITEM 8 - Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable to this Registrant, insofar as the Registrant is not a closed-end management investment company.
ITEM 9 - Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers
Not applicable to this Registrant, insofar as the Registrant is not a closed-end management investment company.
ITEM 10 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant's Board of Trustees since the Registrant last submitted a proxy statement to its shareholders. The procedures are as follows. The Registrant has a Nominating and Governance Committee comprised solely of persons who are not considered ‘‘interested persons’’ of the Registrant within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The committee periodically reviews such issues as the Board’s composition, responsibilities, committees, compensation and other relevant issues, and recommends any appropriate changes to the full Board of Trustees. While the committee normally is able to identify from its own resources an ample number of qualified candidates, it will consider shareholder suggestions of persons to be considered as nominees to fill future vacancies on the Board. Such suggestions must be sent in writing to the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Registrant, c/o the Registrant’s Secretary, and must be accompanied by complete biographical and occupational data on the prospective nominee, along with a written consent of the prospective nominee for consideration of his or her name by the Nominating and Governance Committee.
ITEM 11 - Controls and Procedures
(a) | The Registrant’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 30a-3 under the Investment Company Act of 1940), that such controls and procedures are adequate and reasonably designed to achieve the purposes described in paragraph (c) of such rule. |
(b) | There were no changes in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) that occurred during the Registrant’s second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
ITEM 12 - Exhibits
(a)(1) | The Code of Ethics that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2 is attached as an exhibit hereto. |
(a)(2) | The certifications required by Rule 30a-2 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are attached as exhibits hereto. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AMERICAN HIGH-INCOME TRUST
By /s/ David C. Barclay
David C. Barclay, President and PEO
Date: December 8, 2005
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By /s/ David C. Barclay
David C. Barclay, President and PEO
Date: December 8, 2005
By /s/ Susi M. Silverman
Susi M. Silverman, Treasurer and PFO
Date: December 8, 2005