UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
Certified Shareholder Report of
Registered Management Investment Companies
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-05364
American High-Income Trust
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (213) 486-9200
Date of fiscal year end: September 30
Date of reporting period: September 30, 2008
Kimberly S. Verdick
Capital Research and Management Company
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
Copies to:
Michael Glazer
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
515 South Flower Street, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
(Counsel for the Registrant)
ITEM 1 – Reports to Stockholders
[logo - American Funds®]
The right choice for the long term®
American High-Income Trust
Consistency amid change
How your fund has navigated two decades of changes in the high-yield market
[photo of office buildings]
Annual report for the year ended September 30, 2008
American High-Income TrustSM seeks a high level of current income and, secondarily, capital appreciation through a diversified, carefully supervised portfolio consisting primarily of lower rated, higher risk corporate bonds.
This fund is one of the 31 American Funds. American Funds is one of the nation’s largest mutual fund families. For more than 75 years, Capital Research and Management Company,SM the American Funds adviser, has invested with a long-term focus based on thorough research and attention to risk.
Fund results shown in this report, unless otherwise indicated, are for Class A shares at net asset value. If a sales charge (maximum 3.75%) had been deducted, the results would have been lower. Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. Investing for short periods makes losses more likely. Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
The fund’s investment adviser waived 5% of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through March 31, 2005, and increased the waiver to 10% on April 1, 2005. Fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. Please see the Financial Highlights table on pages 24 and 25 for details.
The fund’s 30-day yield for Class A shares as of October 31, 2008, calculated in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission formula, was 13.43% (13.39% without the fee waiver). The fund’s distribution rate for Class A shares as of that date was 10.59%. Both reflect the 3.75% maximum sales charge. The SEC yield reflects the rate at which the fund is earning income on its current portfolio of securities while the distribution rate reflects the fund’s past dividends paid to shareholders. Accordingly, the fund’s SEC yield and distribution rate may differ.
Results for other share classes can be found on page 31.
The return of principal in bond funds is not guaranteed. Bond funds have the same interest rate, inflation and credit risks that are associated with the underlying bonds owned by the fund. High-yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing outside the United States may be subject to additional risks, such as currency fluctuations, political instability, differing securities regulations and periods of illiquidity, which are detailed in the fund’s prospectus.
In this report | |
Special feature | |
4 | Consistency amid change |
How your fund’s investment | |
approach has helped it navigate | |
20 years of changes in the | |
high-yield bond market | |
Contents | |
1 | Letter to shareholders |
3 | The value of a long-term |
perspective | |
11 | Summary investment portfolio |
16 | Financial statements |
32 | Board of trustees and |
other officers |
Fellow shareholders:
[photo of office buildings]
American High-Income Trust ended its fiscal year amid tremendous economic and market volatility. As trouble in the U.S. subprime mortgage market spread to the credit and financial markets, it triggered a global liquidity crisis, which caused stock and bond markets to plummet.
American High-Income Trust ended its fiscal year amid tremendous economic and market volatility. As trouble in the U.S. subprime mortgage market spread to the credit and financial markets, it triggered a global liquidity crisis, which caused stock and bond markets to plummet.
In this environment, your fund reported a loss of 11.9% for the 12 months ended September 30, 2008, assuming the reinvestment of monthly dividends totaling 93 cents a share and a capital gain distribution of 2 cents a share. Shareholders who reinvested dividends received an income return of 7.9% for the year. Those who elected to take dividends in cash received an income return of 7.6% and saw the value of their shares decline 18.9%.
Those results compare with an 11.4% loss for the Lipper High Current Yield Bond Funds Index, a benchmark of similar funds, and a 10.0% loss for the Credit Suisse High Yield Index, which attempts to mirror the high-yield debt markets. The latter index is unmanaged and includes no expenses.
Despite weakness in most parts of the investment-grade market, particularly in corporate bonds, an increasing number of investors bought U.S. Treasuries as a hedge against the volatile equity markets. That helped drive returns for the Citigroup Broad Investment-Grade (BIG) Bond Index, an unmanaged index that measures high-quality bond markets including Treasuries. The index posted a 4.5% total return, not including expenses.
Putting the year in perspective
Fiscal year 2008 has been an extraordinary period in both the stock and bond markets. Although we have experienced other periods of significant weakness in high-yield bonds since the fund’s 1988 inception, the current period’s decline has been particularly widespread across all financial markets and throughout the world.
For the high-yield market, the current crisis began in May 2007. Declining home values set off a rise in mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures that ultimately translated into sizable losses across a range of securitization products and packaged bonds. What started with the bursting of a real estate bubble soon spread to all financial and credit markets, sparking a global liquidity crisis. The rapid and significant decline in liquidity led to sharp drops in securities prices and widespread weakness across all fixed-income markets.
As these losses multiplied, they forced a number of prominent financial institutions to either go bankrupt or be bought out, which has contributed to the decline in liquidity in fixed-income markets. Going forward, there will be considerable unwinding of leverage in the financial markets. That will have a large impact on the high-yield market and, combined with general economic weakness, will likely result in an increase in defaults and corporate difficulties over the next year.
[Begin Sidebar]
Results at a glance | ||||||||||||||||
For periods ended September 30, 2008, with all distributions reinvested | ||||||||||||||||
Total returns | Average annual total returns | |||||||||||||||
1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Lifetime | |||||||||||||
(since 2/19/88) | ||||||||||||||||
American High-Income Trust | ||||||||||||||||
(Class A shares) | –11.9 | % | 4.1 | % | 5.5 | % | 8.0 | % | ||||||||
Lipper High Current Yield | ||||||||||||||||
Bond Funds Index* | –11.4 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 6.3 | ||||||||||||
Credit Suisse High Yield Index† | –10.0 | 4.8 | 5.3 | 8.0 | ||||||||||||
Citigroup Broad Investment-Grade | ||||||||||||||||
(BIG) Bond Index† | 4.5 | 4.0 | 5.3 | 7.2 | ||||||||||||
*The Lipper index does not reflect the effect of sales charges. | ||||||||||||||||
† The market indexes are unmanaged and do not reflect the effect of sales charges, commissions or expenses. |
Since its inception through September 30, 2008, American High-Income Trust ranked 4th in total return among the 37 high current yield funds in existence throughout the period, according to Lipper. For the 10 years ended September 30, 2008, the fund ranked 20th of 185; for the five years ended September 30, 2008, it ranked 137th of 338; and for the 12 months ended September 30, 2008, it ranked 338th of 466. Lipper rankings do not reflect the effect of sales charges.
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Sidebar]
Many price declines have not been driven by fundamental operating weakness at the companies, but are the result of deleveraging, which we believe makes the risk-reward proposition better for investors than it was a year ago.
[End Sidebar]
In the weeks following the fund’s fiscal year-end, equity and bond markets continued to weaken. From September 30, 2008, through October 10, 2008, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Average, a broad measure of the U.S. equity market, dropped another 22.9%, while the Lipper High Current Yield Bond Funds Index declined 12.8%. The week ending October 10, 2008, marked one of the largest one-week declines and some of the greatest volatility ever experienced in the stock market.
To address the global credit crisis, the U.S. government and, increasingly, other governments around the world are taking steps to foster liquidity and solvency in the financial system. These efforts are still evolving, but they will be an important part of financial stabilization, and we are optimistic that they will ultimately have a positive impact.
Finding value in today’s market
In the current market weakness, nearly all bonds suffered price declines because of forced selling by some market participants. Many price declines have not been driven by fundamental operating weakness at the companies, but are the result of deleveraging, which we believe makes the risk-reward proposition better for investors than it was a year ago.
In fact, valuations for some companies have become so inexpensive that we are finding attractive long-term investment opportunities, even in securities that have not typically been a significant part of the fund’s portfolio, such as mortgage-backed securities and bonds of financial institutions. For us, the key is to identify those companies with strong or improving fundamentals that can survive the coming economic weakness and not default on their debt obligations.
Staying true to our mandate
As American High-Income Trust marks its 20th anniversary this year, it’s important to note that this is not the first credit cycle or market downturn our managers have experienced. Although each cycle has its own distinguishing characteristics, we believe our consistent emphasis on building a diversified and research-driven investment portfolio has allowed the fund to endure the fluctuations of the market for the past two decades. Going forward, we believe fundamental research will be critical in selecting issuers that will be able to support their debt obligations through various business and market cycles.
For the past 10 years ended September 30, 2008, the fund has earned an average annual total return of 5.5%. That compares with a 3.2% return for the Lipper High Current Yield Bond Funds Index and a 5.3% return for the unmanaged Credit Suisse High Yield Index.
By comparison, the Citigroup Broad Investment-Grade (BIG) Bond Index earned an average annual total return of 5.3% for the same period, while the S&P 500 posted a 3.1% return.
To learn more about how American High-Income Trust’s approach has allowed it to weather market and cycle changes in the high-yield market since its inception 20 years ago, please read our feature story, “Consistency Amid Change,” starting on page 4.
As always, we appreciate your continued support and long-term investment perspective.
Sincerely,
/s/ Paul G. Haaga, Jr.
Paul G. Haaga, Jr.
Vice Chairman
/s/ David C. Barclay
David C. Barclay
President
November 10, 2008
For current information about the fund, visit americanfunds.com.
The value of a long-term perspective
Here’s how a $10,000 investment in American High-Income Trust grew between February 19, 1988, when the fund began operations, and September 30, 2008, the end of its latest fiscal year. As you can see, that $10,000 grew to $46,800 with all distributions reinvested.
Fund results shown reflect deduction of the maximum sales charge of 3.75% on the $10,000 investment.1 Thus, the net amount invested was $9,625.2
[begin mountain chart]
[end mountain chart]
Years ended September 30 | American High-Income Trust | Lipper High Current Yield Bond Funds Index4 | Citigroup Broad Investment-Grade (BIG) Bond Index3 | Credit Suisse High Yield Index3 | Consumer Price Index (inflation)5 | |||||||||||||||
2/19/88 | $ | 9,625 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | ||||||||||
1988 | 10,182 | 10,475 | 10,222 | 10,447 | 10,328 | |||||||||||||||
1989 | 11,189 | 10,935 | 11,367 | 11,026 | 10,776 | |||||||||||||||
1990 | 10,735 | 9,570 | 12,237 | 10,047 | 11,440 | |||||||||||||||
1991 | 13,873 | 12,290 | 14,198 | 13,757 | 11,828 | |||||||||||||||
1992 | 16,376 | 15,132 | 15,999 | 16,573 | 12,181 | |||||||||||||||
1993 | 18,764 | 17,473 | 17,627 | 19,172 | 12,509 | |||||||||||||||
1994 | 19,066 | 17,899 | 17,063 | 19,831 | 12,879 | |||||||||||||||
1995 | 21,604 | 20,178 | 19,461 | 22,619 | 13,207 | |||||||||||||||
1996 | 24,570 | 22,644 | 20,423 | 25,054 | 13,603 | |||||||||||||||
1997 | 28,176 | 26,120 | 22,406 | 28,994 | 13,897 | |||||||||||||||
1998 | 27,491 | 25,688 | 24,975 | 28,842 | 14,103 | |||||||||||||||
1999 | 29,721 | 27,037 | 24,908 | 29,980 | 14,474 | |||||||||||||||
2000 | 31,295 | 27,021 | 26,632 | 30,555 | 14,974 | |||||||||||||||
2001 | 30,218 | 23,569 | 30,110 | 29,050 | 15,371 | |||||||||||||||
2002 | 28,442 | 22,814 | 32,632 | 29,877 | 15,603 | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 38,197 | 28,862 | 34,423 | 38,257 | 15,966 | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 42,235 | 32,215 | 35,738 | 43,352 | 16,371 | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 45,421 | 34,422 | 36,783 | 46,089 | 17,138 | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 49,174 | 36,744 | 38,147 | 49,667 | 17,491 | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 53,103 | 39,586 | 40,148 | 53,807 | 17,973 | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 46,800 | 35,054 | 41,947 | 48,410 | 18,861 |
1As outlined in the prospectus, the sales charge is reduced for accounts (and aggregated investments) of $100,000 or more and is eliminated for purchases of $1 million or more. There is no sales charge on dividends or capital gain distributions that are reinvested in additional shares. |
2The maximum initial sales charge was 4.75% prior to January 10, 2000. |
3The market indexes are unmanaged and include reinvested distributions, but do not reflect the effect of sales charges, commissions or expenses. |
4Calculated by Lipper. The index does not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
5Computed from data supplied by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. |
6For the period February 19 through September 30, 1988. |
Past results are not predictive of results in future periods. The results shown are before taxes on fund distributions and sale of fund shares.
Average annual total returns based on a $1,000 investment (for periods ended September 30, 2008)* | ||||||||||||
1 year | 5 years | 10 years | ||||||||||
Class A shares | –15.17 | % | 3.36 | % | 5.06 | % | ||||||
*Assumes reinvestment of all distributions and payment of the maximum 3.75% sales charge. |
The total annual fund operating expense ratio for Class A shares as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 0.70%. This figure does not reflect a fee waiver currently in effect; therefore, the actual expense ratio is lower.
The fund’s investment adviser waived 5% of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through March 31, 2005, and increased the waiver to 10% on April 1, 2005. Fund results shown reflect actual expenses, with the waiver applied. Fund results would have been lower without the waiver. Please see the Financial Highlights table on pages 24 and 25 for details.
Consistency amid change
How your fund’s investment approach has helped it navigate 20 years of changes in the high-yield bond market
[photo of a mirrored office building - other buildings reflected in the mirrored glass]
[Begin Sidebar]
The evolution of a market
A 20-year review of the major events and milestones in the high-yield bond market
Fund results shown are for Class A shares at net asset value. If a sales charge (maximum 3.75%) had been deducted, the results would have been lower. Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Numbers next to the years denote total returns for 12-month periods ending September 30, except for the first fiscal year, which ran from February 19, 1988, to September 30, 1988. Returns assume reinvestment of all dividends and capital gains distributions.
1988 +5.8%
American High-Income Trust begins operations on February 19 with about $25 million in assets. A little over seven months later, on September 30, the end of the fund’s fiscal year, assets more than double to $68 million. Interest rates are on the rise, bond prices are falling and the savings and loan (S&L) crisis is in full force.
1989 +9.9%
The high-yield bond market experiences major price swings. Real estate prices peak, and inflation fears escalate. President George Bush unveils an S&L rescue plan. Leveraged buyouts (LBOs) reach an unprecedented number and size.
1990 – 4.1%
In February, Drexel Burnham Lambert Group files for bankruptcy. LBO activity declines. Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait causes stock prices to fall and oil prices to rise. Uncertain demand for high-yield bonds causes prices to decline. Concerns arise about domestic financial institutions. An economic recession begins.
[End Sidebar]
On February 19, 1988, American High-Income Trust opened its doors under less-than-ideal market conditions. Just four months earlier, in October 1987, the stock market had crashed, with the Dow Jones Industrials Average losing 22.6% of its value in one day — the greatest single-day loss that Wall Street had ever experienced up to that point.
When the fund began operations, the stock market was still uncertain, interest rates were rising and bond prices were falling. The situation worsened over the next year. Drexel Burnham Lambert, the investment banking firm that dominated the high-yield bond market at the time, found itself struggling to survive after a scandal and a liquidity squeeze. In 1990, Drexel declared bankruptcy, eroding confidence in high-yield bonds as a financial instrument. Default rates on high-yield debt skyrocketed, and liquidity dried up. More bad economic news followed: Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait caused stock prices to fall sharply, and high-yield bond prices followed suit. Real estate prices, after having peaked the year before, began to plummet. Savings and loan associations across the country continued to fail. Oil prices rose dramatically, and the U.S. economy slumped into a recession.
Twenty years after the fund’s inception, similar headlines are leaving many investors panicked. High oil prices, the war in Iraq, a decline in home values, the subsequent subprime mortgage debacle, the implosion of a number of high-profile banks and investment firms, and a global liquidity crisis have caused the stock and bond markets to plunge.
But the managers of American High-Income Trust have experienced difficult markets before. All five portfolio counselors in the fund, and many of the analysts, have worked together for more than 10 years and have experienced the evolution of the high-yield bond market and the ups and downs of previous market cycles firsthand.
“All the fund’s investment professionals have been managing money for many years and have lived through difficult credit cycles and liquidity crises before,” says David Barclay, who has been with American High-Income Trust since its inception and is currently its president. “Even as markets have evolved over the past 20 years, the key element of our investment approach — intense fundamental research — remains the same.”
How the market has evolved
Despite the similarity to 1988 headlines, today’s high-yield bond market differs greatly from that of 20 years ago. “Overall, the market has matured,” says Susan Tolson, a portfolio counselor of the fund. “It has grown from a small, thinly traded $200 billion club dominated by Drexel, which single-handedly spurred the market’s growth in the 1980s, to a more diverse and deeply traded $960 billion market.”
The market has been primarily impacted by several key trends: greater diversification in the types of companies and industries using high-yield bonds, increased complexity in capital structures, the evolution of the direct loan market, new types of bond buyers and innovations in financial products.
[Begin Sidebar]
1991 +29.2%
The U.S. economy remains in a recession, and problems in the banking system linger; however, significantly lower short-term interest rates and higher bond and stock prices increase investor confidence. Kuwait is liberated, and the price of oil returns to approximately the level of early 1990. The era of LBOs ends.
1992 +18.0%
Interest rates continue to decline. Low inflation, stable oil prices and signs of an economic recovery help push high-yield bond prices even higher. New issuance is high, as heavily leveraged companies take advantage of lower interest rates to refinance their debts at reduced costs.
1993 +14.6%
Moderate inflation, low interest rates and continued economic recovery create a favorable climate for high-yield bonds. Companies continue to strengthen their balance sheets by refinancing old debt at lower rates. The fund marks its fifth anniversary. Assets reach $707 million.
1994 +1.6%
The recovering U.S. economy helps bolster corporate profits and improve corporate balance sheets. The Federal Reserve Board raises interest rates to pre-empt inflation. Long-term interest rates soar, and bond prices fall.
1995 +13.3%
When the fiscal year begins, the bond market is in one of the worst periods in its history. The abrupt devaluation of the Mexican peso in December 1994 causes a ripple effect in many fixed-income markets around the globe. Later in the period, sentiment begins to change, interest rates fall and bond prices rally.
[End Sidebar]
Greater diversification. “The breadth of the market has improved,” says David Daigle, a portfolio counselor of the fund. “Compared to 20 years ago, we have a much broader set of investment ideas to choose from, as more companies and industries seek financing in the high-yield market.”
Once dominated by leveraged buyouts, the high-yield market now includes companies in new industries that are raising money to fund their growth and expansion, as well as more established firms looking to fund restructuring and acquisition goals. As a result, American High-Income Trust’s portfolio today contains bonds issued by companies in the financial, auto, technology and utilities industries — all not traditionally part of the high-yield market.
“Today, there is much more leverage in corporate America overall,” says Barclay. “There is more flexibility and diversification in the ways companies borrow money. As a result, it has become a more diversified universe for investors.”
The high-yield market has also expanded globally and now includes bonds issued by corporations and governments in both developed countries and emerging markets.
More complex capital structures. Capital structures are also offering new investment opportunities. As more high-yield companies opt to raise capital at different levels of their capital structure, multiple layers of holdings within companies are being created. “Traditionally, senior portions of the capital structure were generally held by banks and were not available to us,” says Daigle. “Now we can buy anywhere in the capital structure. That gives us more range to find the right risk-reward balance.”
Evolution of the direct loan market. Another recent trend: Banks have begun selling their secured loan debt to institutional investors. Instead of banks being the only primary lenders of secured loans, now certain mutual funds and other institutions can invest in these loans. “The loan market has become part of the high-yield market,” says Barclay. “Now loans are sold off by banks, bought by investors and traded, creating another way to invest in high yield.”
More types of bond buyers. In the 1980s, the high-yield markets were just developing and there was a limited buyer base. Back then, buyers of high-yield bonds included mutual funds, insurance companies and pension funds. Today, mutual funds make up a smaller percentage of the high-yield market, as hedge funds and international buyers have become larger players.
Hedge funds, in particular, have had a huge influence on the markets. Hedge funds attempt to offset potential losses or reap larger gains through “short selling,” the practice of selling a security that the seller first borrows (rather than owns) and purchases later to cover the short. The idea is to profit from an expected decline, rather than an increase, in a security’s price. As a result, hedge funds can influence the broader markets and create more volatility, even for funds that do not engage in this practice.
[Begin Sidebar]
1996 +13.7%
The bond market experiences a full cycle of declining and rising interest rates. The economy continues to expand. A strong equity market provides companies with a source of capital, which helps propel the high-yield bond market.
1997 +14.7%
This marks another strong year for the bond market. American High-Income Trust passes $2 billion in assets, making it one of the 50 largest taxable fixed-income funds tracked by Lipper.
1998 – 2.4%
The fund marks its 10th anniversary. Assets reach $2.4 billion. In the first half of the period, inflation remains in check, the economy is healthy and corporate earnings are strong. But near the end of the fiscal year, a crisis in Asian markets, combined with concerns about weak corporate profits and a possible economic slowdown, prompts a global flight to quality, which favors Treasury debt and hurts high-yield bond prices.
1999 +8.1%
Early in the period, high-yield bonds enjoy a brief period of rising prices as a result of low inflation, an economic recovery in some overseas markets and lower Treasury bond prices. Later, as high-yield interest rates rise and the supply of high-yield bonds begins to outstrip demand, prices decline.
[End Sidebar]
Innovations in financial products. Over the past 20 years, bond investing has become increasingly sophisticated as technological advances inspired the development of an array of financial instruments created by investment banks, including vehicles for both hedging and securitization.
Credit default swaps, which constitute the bulk of the credit derivatives market, have had a huge impact on the high-yield market. Basically, these products have features similar to insurance contracts, promising to cover losses if a firm defaults on its corporate bond or loan obligations. They were originally created to allow banks to more easily offset the credit risk on their business loan portfolios. In practice, credit default swaps have allowed investor speculation and caused significant dislocation in the markets.
Securitization vehicles, another financial innovation, are special-purpose entities that buy credit risk and fund it with their own liabilities. One example of a securitization vehicle is collateralized loan obligations (CLOs). This type of asset-backed security holds assets as collateral and sells packages of cash flows to investors.
“Securitization vehicles and hedge funds are driving the market,” says Daigle. “A lot of our current problems, including the subprime debacle, stemmed from securitization vehicles buying investment risk. Although we do not invest in many securitization vehicles, such as structured investment vehicles or collateralized debt obligations, they have an indirect impact on the fund. Many times, price trends are being dictated by whether a CLO is buying or liquidating loans — not by the company’s fundamentals.”
[Begin Sidebar]
[photo of a mason building - another building in the background]
“Even as markets have evolved over the past 20 years, the key element of our investment approach — intense fundamental research — remains the same.”
David Barclay
President
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Sidebar]
2000 +5.3%
Strong economic growth and rising rates dampen bond prices during the first part of the period. The stock market peaks on March 24, 2000. As global competition increases pressure on corporate profits, stock market prices begin to decline. Bond prices begin to recover.
2001 –3.4%
Stock market indexes continue to decline, as companies announce weaker earnings forecasts. Economic malaise deepens through much of the year, prompting an increase in corporate defaults and putting renewed pressure on stock prices. Corporate bond prices decline. The Fed begins a series of aggressive rate cuts in January, as the economy slips into a recession. Just weeks before the end of the fiscal year, the September 11 terrorist attacks disrupt stock and bond market trading for several days, and the fund ends on a weaker note.
2002 –5.9%
The economic recession deepens in the wake of September 11. Weak corporate earnings, diminished access to capital, rapidly eroding credit ratings, concerns about accounting irregularities, and a series of high-profile defaults hurt high-yield bond prices. The fund posts the worst fiscal-year results of its lifetime thus far.
2003 +34.3%
The fund marks its 15th anniversary. Assets reach $8.4 billion. The stock market bottoms on October 9, 2002. An improving economy, stronger balance sheets, lower default rates and greater availability of credit lead to a sharp recovery in corporate bond prices. The fund posts the strongest fiscal-year results of its lifetime.
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Sidebar]
[photo of a mason building - a mirrored building in the background]
“From an investment perspective, we try to make smaller, incremental returns from a larger number of investments rather than rely on a small group of larger investments. At the end of the day, we build the portfolio one company at a time.”
Marc Linden
Portfolio counselor
[End Sidebar]
A consistent investment approach
Throughout all the changes and shifts in the high-yield market, American High-Income Trust has maintained the research-intensive approach it adopted on its first day. Today, as in February 1988, the fund seeks to invest in bonds that offer a high current yield and an opportunity for price appreciation over time. It meets these objectives through its focus on fundamental research, diversification through its multiple portfolio counselor system and a value-oriented, long-term perspective.
Focus on fundamental research. In American High-Income Trust’s 1994 annual report, its research process was described as follows: “We work together as a global team [to] collectively look at a company’s prospects for growth, its market leadership, its management and its cash flow. It then comes down to an equity-type judgment: Are the company’s debt securities more attractive than, let’s say, a 10-year Treasury security which does not have any credit risk? That means we must use our experience and research to judge whether or not a particular bond seems to provide an attractive compensation relative to the risks we perceive.”
The same process applies today. “The key element of what we do remains the same,” says Marc Linden, a portfolio counselor of the fund. “We are looking at the same issues: the economics of the business, the sustainability of the business and the ability of the company to meet its debt obligations over various business and market cycles. That is the basis of our fundamental research.”
[Begin Sidebar]
2004 +10.6%
A growing economy, low interest rates and moderate inflation help credit fundamentals to improve and default rates to decline. Many issuers of high-yield bonds boost profits and improve their balance sheets through debt reduction. As the market rallies, increased investor demand bids the prices of high-yield securities up further. By the end of the period, the high-yield market begins to slow and even forfeit some of its earlier gains, in part due to inflationary concerns and anticipation of interest rate increases. In June, the Fed raises the federal funds rate for the first time in four years, followed by three more increases over the next five months.
2005 +7.5%
Low inflation, strong corporate fundamentals and easy access to capital create a favorable climate for high-yield bonds. After several years of an active deleveraging cycle, more companies are adding debt and increasing leverage to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions and dividend payments.
Putting pressure on high-yield bond prices are rising interest rates and the trend toward larger and more aggressive LBO deals. In May, General Motors and Ford are downgraded to below investment grade, rattling investors and hurting the corporate bond market.
2006 +8.3%
Rising corporate profits, solid economic growth, low default rates and brisk demand help high-yield bonds. Inflation concerns cause the Fed to raise interest rates. Strong corporate profits encourage companies to take on more debt, which helps offset the effect of rising rates. Homebuilders begin to suffer declines in profitability and demand, as the housing market slows.
[End Sidebar]
Diversification. American High-Income Trust owns 731 securities in industries as varied as telecommunication services, information technology, health care and industrials. Up to 25% of the portfolio may be invested in holdings outside the U.S. As of the fund’s fiscal year-end, no one issuer made up more than 2.73% of the fund.
That kind of diversification is particularly important in volatile environments, such as the current one, because it spreads the investment risk among a larger number of holdings. “From an investment perspective, we try to make smaller, incremental returns from a larger number of investments rather than rely on a small group of larger investments,” says Linden. “At the end of the day, we build the portfolio one company at a time.”
The multiple portfolio counselor system helps the managers achieve this goal. In this system, the fund’s portfolio is divided into portions. Each of the fund’s five portfolio counselors manages one portion; another is managed by the fund’s research analysts, who bring their own investment knowledge to the table. “The system incorporates different viewpoints and styles in the fund,” says Tolson. “That has helped create stability for the fund’s management system, limit volatility and improve long-term returns.”
A long-term, value-oriented perspective. Finally, while many investors have embraced an ever-shorter focus on results, the managers of this fund look farther down the road. “We strive to invest on a multiyear time horizon,” says Daigle. “With hedge funds, monthly and quarterly results drive behavior. We are more concerned with five-year results. So when we see hedge-fund redemptions, it can be an opportunity for us on a long-term basis to add value to the portfolio if we are patient and prudent about when we take on risk.”
Experience can be critical when it comes to surviving a volatile period such as this one and to positioning the fund for the eventual upturn. “Markets tend to be cyclical,” says Linden. “Many of us have been through market shutdowns before, when there was little access to capital. We realize it can be fatal for companies that are not prepared, but it can also create incredible opportunities, as we saw in 2003 and 2004. The key is to find companies that can survive various market cycles. The people who lose are those who are forced to sell at the bottom of the market because they didn’t plan properly for stress.”
This consistent focus on research, diversification and a long-term, value-oriented perspective has allowed American High-Income Trust to endure the ups and downs of the market for more than two decades, making it one of the older high-yield bond funds today. Of the 503 high-yield bond funds in existence today, less than half have been around for a decade or longer and just 37 have been around since 1988, the year this fund was formed. Of those 37 funds that were around 20 years ago, American High-Income Trust ranks fourth in terms of results through September 30, 2008, according to Lipper. (Lipper rankings do not reflect the effect of sales charges.)
[Begin Sidebar]
2007 +8.0%
Early in the fiscal year, ample liquidity, low market volatility, an increase in LBOs and strong investor demand for higher yielding assets help drive returns for high-yield bonds even higher. But in the last three months of the period, results are negatively impacted when trouble in the subprime-mortgage market spreads to credit markets, sparking a global liquidity crisis, and increasingly aggressive LBOs result in a supply of debt that is difficult to sell. Economic growth slows because of a weakening housing market. Despite market pressures, credit fundamentals in the high-yield market remain strong, as companies continue to generate cash flow and enjoy healthy operating environments.
2008 –11.9%
The global credit crunch deepens, leading to distress among financial institutions. The stock and bond markets plummet. Unprecedented events include the forced sale of Bear Stearns to JPMorgan Chase; the U.S. government’s conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; Lehman Brothers Holdings’ filing for bankruptcy; and Bank of America’s acquisition of Merrill Lynch. In addition, the Federal Reserve loans $80 billion to American International Group; Wachovia is sold to Wells Fargo; and Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley become bank holding companies. American High-Income Trust marks its 20th anniversary. Assets reach $11.5 billion.
[End Sidebar]
How will the market evolve going forward?
The fund’s first two decades have been a time of sweeping changes in the high-yield bond market. But what kinds of changes can investors expect over the next decade? There are several trends that the fund’s investment professionals are monitoring.
Globalization. “Ten years from now, we expect that high-yield markets will be more global,” says Linden. “Having debt as a key source of capital for companies is becoming more widely accepted, and we expect it to be more so in the future, in spite of credit markets today. Over time, more countries will accept borrowing as a valid part of the capital structure.”
Continued evolution of the loan market. “I see several changes that will make the bond and loan markets converge,” says Daigle. Dominated by banks in the past, the loan market has become more institutionalized, which means more loans are owned by nonbanks. “Loans today are structured differently than bonds. Over time, they will become more similar to bond structures and more interchangeable. That will benefit us by making the markets even more liquid than they are today.”
Continued complexity. Despite the consequences of some of the financial innovations of recent years, Linden sees continued enhancement in financial products. “We saw increased leverage in recent years and now see the unwinding of leverage. It goes in fits and starts,” he says. “There’s a middle ground between no leverage and crazy leverage. After we work through the current credit crunch, there will be some caution. But debt capital, ultimately, serves a purpose. It is only when done in a reckless manner or when raised without limit that it becomes a risk.”
More regulation. In part due to their involvement in various aspects of the credit derivatives markets, which include such products as credit default swaps, many top investment firms either went bankrupt or were bought out this year, including Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers Holdings and Merrill Lynch. Going forward, credit derivatives markets will likely be more regulated. “We are going into a significant period of increased regulation,” says Tolson, who believes there will be changes to credit default swaps, short selling and certain aspects of the hedge fund business. “The industry has needed more oversight than it’s had in the past 10 years, so I believe it will be good for the market in the long term.”
No matter how the market evolves, the managers of American High-Income Trust will continue to focus on fundamental research, building the portfolio one security at a time. “We do not try to pick absolute market bottoms or tops,” says Daigle. “We strive to make investments over multiyear time horizons that have a good risk-reward trade-off. Despite all the changes in the market, that’s been an enduring trait among all the investment professionals in the fund.” n
Fund results shown are for Class A shares at net asset value. If a sales charge (maximum 3.75%) had been deducted, the results would have been lower. Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Summary investment portfolio, September 30, 2008
The following summary investment portfolio is designed to streamline the report and help investors better focus on a fund’s principal holdings. For details on how to obtain a complete schedule of portfolio holdings, please see the inside back cover.
[begin pie chart]
Portfolio by type of security (percent of net assets) | ||||
U.S. corporate bonds & notes | 61.9 | |||
Corporate bonds & notes of issuers outside the U.S. | 11.6 | |||
Corporate loans | 6.0 | |||
Bonds & notes of governments & government agencies outside the U.S. | 3.5 | |||
Other | 1.6 | |||
Common stocks & warrants | 1.2 | |||
Preferred securities | 0.7 | |||
Convertible securities | 0.5 | |||
Short-term securities & other assets less liabilities | 13.0 |
Bonds, notes & other debt instruments - 84.57% | Principal amount (000) | Value (000) | Percent of net assets |
Corporate bonds, notes & loans - 79.50% | |||
Consumer discretionary - 21.60% | |||
Charter Communications Operating, LLC and Charter Communications Operating Capital Corp.: | |||
8.00% 2012 (1) | $50,950 | $45,855 | |
8.375%-10.875% 2014 (1) | 55,200 | 51,308 | |
Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Term Loans, 4.80%-8.77% 2014 (2) (3) (4) | 71,427 | 61,194 | |
CCH II, LLC and CCH II Capital Corp. 10.25% 2010 | 62,980 | 56,997 | |
CCH I, LLC and CCH I Capital Corp. 11.00% 2015 | 78,275 | 52,053 | |
CCO Holdings, LLC and CCO Holdings Capital Corp. 8.75% 2013 | 43,890 | 38,404 | |
Charter Communications Holdings, LLC and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corp. 11.75%-13.50% 2011-2012 | 14,375 | 9,274 | 2.73 |
Univision Communications Inc.: | |||
9.75% 2015 (1) (5) | 160,720 | 75,538 | |
7.85% 2011 | 44,456 | 34,898 | |
Term Loans, 5.049%-6.50% 2009-2014 (2) (3) (4) | 76,689 | 53,028 | 1.42 |
CanWest Media Inc., Series B, 8.00% 2012 | 91,198 | 76,606 | .66 |
Michaels Stores, Inc. 10.00% 2014 | 101,525 | 64,468 | .56 |
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. 11.25% 2015 (1) (5) | 74,975 | 61,854 | .54 |
Gray Television Inc., Series D, 12.00%/15.00% (undated) (6) (7) (8) | 64,500 | 56,438 | .49 |
Toys "R" Us, Inc. 7.625% 2011 | 62,330 | 52,357 | .45 |
Ford Motor Co.: | |||
Term Loan B, 5.49% 2013 (2) (3) (4) | 25,400 | 16,955 | |
6.50%-9.50% 2011-2031 (8) | 24,328 | 10,450 | |
FCE Bank PLC 7.125% 2013 (8) | €11,550 | 11,049 | |
Ford Capital BV 9.50% 2010 (8) | $4,000 | 2,740 | .36 |
Other securities | 1,658,413 | 14.39 | |
2,489,879 | 21.60 | ||
Industrials - 10.04% | |||
Nielsen Finance LLC and Nielsen Finance Co.: | |||
10.00% 2014 | 92,625 | 88,457 | |
0%/12.50% 2016 (7) | 113,700 | 74,474 | |
Nielsen Finance LLC, Term Loan B, 4.803% 2013 (2) (3) (4) | 9,701 | 8,606 | 1.49 |
DAE Aviation Holdings, Inc. 11.25% 2015 (1) (8) | 66,070 | 59,463 | .51 |
Other securities | 926,767 | 8.04 | |
1,157,767 | 10.04 | ||
Telecommunication services - 8.38% | |||
Qwest Capital Funding, Inc.: | |||
7.25% 2011 | 83,750 | 78,725 | |
7.625%-7.90% 2010-2021 | 19,610 | 18,796 | |
Qwest Communications International Inc. 7.25% 2011 | 43,725 | 41,648 | |
Qwest Corp. 8.875% 2012 | 3,600 | 3,546 | |
U S WEST Capital Funding, Inc. 6.875% 2028 | 3,300 | 2,310 | 1.26 |
Nextel Communications, Inc.: | |||
Series F, 5.95% 2014 | 71,690 | 48,083 | |
6.875%-7.375% 2013-2015 | 68,491 | 45,540 | |
Sprint Capital Corp. 6.375%-8.75% 2009-2032 | 31,880 | 25,428 | |
Sprint Nextel Corp. 4.169%-6.00% 2010-2016 (2) | 30,370 | 24,243 | 1.24 |
Windstream Corp.: | |||
8.125% 2013 | 93,400 | 89,197 | |
8.625% 2016 | 12,300 | 11,408 | |
Valor Telecommunications Enterprises, LLC and Valor Telecommunications Enterprises Finance Corp. 7.75% 2015 | 31,370 | 29,919 | 1.13 |
Centennial Communications Corp. 8.541%-10.00% 2013 (2) | 63,000 | 58,298 | |
Centennial Communications Corp. and Centennial Cellular Operating Co. LLC 10.125% 2013 | 37,505 | 37,318 | |
Centennial Communications Corp., Centennial Cellular Operating Co. LLC and Centennial Puerto Rico Operations Corp. 8.125% 2014 (2) | 24,175 | 24,054 | 1.04 |
American Tower Corp. 7.125% 2012 | 56,985 | 56,415 | .49 |
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. 9.25% 2014 | 58,200 | 54,708 | .47 |
Cricket Communications, Inc. 9.375% 2014 | 49,230 | 46,030 | .40 |
Other securities | 270,650 | 2.35 | |
966,316 | 8.38 | ||
Health care - 8.24% | |||
Tenet Healthcare Corp.: | |||
9.875% 2014 | 149,910 | 146,912 | |
9.25% 2015 | 51,220 | 48,659 | |
6.375%-7.375% 2011-2031 | 26,455 | 24,283 | 1.91 |
HealthSouth Corp.: | |||
9.133% 2014 (2) | 57,805 | 56,360 | |
10.75% 2016 (8) | 86,990 | 90,035 | 1.27 |
VWR Funding, Inc. 10.25% 2015 (2) (5) (8) | 116,360 | 98,906 | .86 |
HCA Inc., Term Loan B, 6.012% 2013 (2) (3) (4) | 68,007 | 60,551 | .52 |
Elan Finance PLC and Elan Finance Corp. 8.875% 2013 | 65,255 | 55,140 | .48 |
PTS Acquisition Corp. 9.50% 2015 (5) (8) | 71,750 | 53,812 | .47 |
Other securities | 314,997 | 2.73 | |
949,655 | 8.24 | ||
Financials - 8.01% | |||
Ford Motor Credit Co.: | |||
5.538% 2012 (2) (8) | 111,310 | 67,343 | |
4.904%-9.875% 2008-2016 (1) (2) (8) | 80,890 | 59,157 | 1.10 |
Countrywide Financial Corp. 0%-6.25% 2010-2037 (1) (2) | 79,076 | 72,438 | |
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. 4.125%-5.625% 2009 | 28,298 | 26,253 | |
Bank of America Corp., Series M, 8.125% noncumulative preferred (undated) (2) | 9,000 | 7,283 | |
MBNA Capital A, Series A, 8.278% 2026 | 7,500 | 6,740 | .98 |
Realogy Corp. 10.50% 2014 | 110,055 | 48,974 | .42 |
Other securities | 634,764 | 5.51 | |
922,952 | 8.01 | ||
Information technology - 7.27% | |||
NXP BV and NXP Funding LLC: | |||
7.875% 2014 | 68,575 | 46,288 | |
9.50% 2015 | 156,040 | 80,751 | |
5.541% 2013 (2) | 42,850 | 28,442 | |
7.713%-8.625% 2013-2015 (2) | €80,125 | 58,028 | 1.85 |
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.: | |||
9.125% 2014 (5) | $206,112 | 130,881 | |
10.125% 2016 | 75,425 | 48,649 | |
Term Loan B, 4.236% 2013 (2) (3) (4) | 4,888 | 4,014 | |
6.694%-8.875% 2014 (2) | 35,425 | 24,560 | 1.80 |
First Data Corp., Term Loan B2, 5.948% 2014 (2) (3) (4) | 66,254 | 57,476 | .50 |
Hughes Communications, Inc. 9.50% 2014 | 53,375 | 52,041 | .45 |
Sanmina-SCI Corp. 8.125% 2016 | 57,375 | 49,056 | .43 |
Other securities | 258,096 | 2.24 | |
838,282 | 7.27 | ||
Utilities - 5.01% | |||
Edison Mission Energy 7.00%-7.75% 2013-2027 | 168,775 | 151,846 | |
Midwest Generation, LLC, Series B, 8.56% 2016 (3) | 39,629 | 40,818 | |
Homer City Funding LLC 8.734% 2026 (3) | 9,179 | 9,363 | 1.75 |
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co. LLC: | |||
10.25% 2015 (1) | 64,400 | 58,443 | |
Series B, 10.25% 2015 (1) | 60,035 | 54,482 | |
Term Loan B2, 6.303% 2014 (2) (3) (4) | 15,880 | 13,418 | |
10.50% 2016 (1) (5) | 12,000 | 10,230 | 1.18 |
Intergen Power 9.00% 2017 (1) | 71,775 | 72,134 | .63 |
Other securities | 167,090 | 1.45 | |
577,824 | 5.01 | ||
Materials - 4.81% | |||
Georgia Gulf Corp. 9.50% 2014 | 77,340 | 47,951 | .42 |
Other securities | 506,341 | 4.39 | |
554,292 | 4.81 | ||
Energy - 3.12% | |||
Enterprise Products Operating LP 7.034% 2068 (2) | 96,310 | 77,771 | .68 |
Other securities | 281,772 | 2.44 | |
359,543 | 3.12 | ||
Consumer staples - 3.02% | |||
Other securities | 348,586 | 3.02 | |
Total corporate bonds, notes & loans | 9,165,096 | 79.50 | |
Bonds & notes of governments & government agencies outside the U.S. - 3.49% | |||
Other securities | 401,966 | 3.49 | |
Other - 1.58% | |||
Other securities | 182,771 | 1.58 | |
Total bonds, notes & other debt instruments (cost: $11,925,450,000) | 9,749,833 | 84.57 | |
Convertible securities - 0.50% | Value (000) | Percent of net assets | |
Other - 0.50% | |||
Other securities | 57,693 | .50 | |
Total convertible securities (cost: $72,079,000) | 57,693 | .50 | |
Preferred securities - 0.70% | Shares | Value (000) | Percent of net assets |
Financials - 0.70% | |||
Bank of America Corp., Series K, 8.00% noncumulative (2) | 5,000,000 | 3,965 | .04 |
Other securities | 76,478 | .66 | |
Total preferred securities (cost: $188,899,000) | 80,443 | .70 | |
Common stocks - 1.25% | Shares | Value (000) | Percent of net assets |
Other - 1.25% | |||
AT&T Inc. | 1,000,000 | 27,920 | .24 |
Ford Motor Co. (9) | 1,877,140 | 9,761 | .09 |
Sprint Nextel Corp., Series 1 | 777,508 | 4,743 | .04 |
Other securities | 101,157 | .88 | |
Total common stocks (cost: $217,126,000) | 143,581 | 1.25 | |
Warrants - 0.00% | Value (000) | Percent of net assets | |
Telecommunication services - 0.00% | |||
Other securities | 3 | .00 | |
Total warrants (cost: $572,000) | 3 | .00 | |
Short-term securities - 11.13% | Principal amount (000) | Value (000) | Percent of net assets |
AT&T Inc. 2.15%-2.20% due 10/14-11/25/2008 (1) | $146,700 | 146,120 | 1.27 |
Hewlett-Packard Co. 2.16%-3.00% due 10/2-11/19/2008 (1) | 129,200 | 128,932 | 1.12 |
Procter & Gamble International Funding S.C.A. 2.08%-2.18% due 10/14-12/2/2008 (1) | 85,800 | 85,581 | .74 |
Freddie Mac 2.13%-2.40% due 11/18-12/30/2008 | 85,200 | 84,919 | .74 |
Illinois Tool Works Inc. 2.12%-2.15% due 10/1-11/21/2008 | 72,500 | 72,294 | .63 |
Fannie Mae 2.25%-2.90% due 12/8-12/24/2008 | 70,100 | 69,917 | .61 |
Merck & Co. Inc. 2.10%-2.20% due 10/24-10/31/2008 | 67,400 | 67,288 | .58 |
Pfizer Inc 2.09%-2.17% due 10/8-11/7/2008 (1) | 65,000 | 64,871 | .56 |
Medtronic Inc. 2.07%-2.08% due 10/22-11/20/2008 (1) | 64,900 | 64,741 | .56 |
NetJets Inc. 2.10% due 10/21/2008 (1) | 50,000 | 49,939 | .43 |
Bank of America Corp. 2.69% due 11/18/2008 | 25,200 | 25,088 | |
Ranger Funding Co. LLC 3.50% due 11/6/2008 (1) | 18,000 | 17,935 | .37 |
Other securities | 405,383 | 3.52 | |
Total short-term securities (cost: $1,283,268,000) | 1,283,008 | 11.13 | |
Total investment securities (cost: $13,687,394,000) | 11,314,561 | 98.15 | |
Other assets less liabilities | 213,684 | 1.85 | |
Net assets | $11,528,245 | 100.00% | |
"Other securities" includes all issues that are not disclosed separately in the summary investment portfolio. |
Investments in affiliates | ||||||
A company is considered to be an affiliate of the fund under the Investment Company Act of 1940 if the | ||||||
fund's holdings in that company represent 5% or more of the outstanding voting shares of that company. | ||||||
The value of the fund's holdings in affiliated companies is included in "Other securities" | ||||||
under their respective industry sectors in the preceding summary investment portfolio. Further details on these | ||||||
holdings and related transactions during the year ended September 30, 2008, appear below. |
Beginning shares or principal amount | Additions | Reductions | Ending shares or principal amount | Dividend or interest income (000) | Value of affiliates at 9/30/08 (000) | |||||||||||||||||||
ZiLOG, Inc. (9) | 1,140,500 | - | - | 1,140,500 | $ | - | $ | 3,661 | ||||||||||||||||
Clarent Hospital Corp. (8) (9) | 576,849 | - | - | 576,849 | - | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||
SunCom Wireless Holdings, Inc., Class A (10) | 7,554,434 | - | 7,554,434 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Triton PCS, Inc. 8.50% 2013 (10) | $ | 113,840,000 | - | $ | 113,840,000 | - | 6,925 | - | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 6,925 | $ | 3,690 |
The following footnotes apply to either the individual securities noted or one or more of the securities aggregated and listed as a single line item. | |||
(1) Purchased in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. May be resold in the U.S. in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. The total value of all such securities, including those in "Other securities," was $2,588,026,000, which represented 22.45% of the net assets of the fund. | |||
(2) Coupon rate may change periodically. | |||
(3) Principal payments may be made periodically. Therefore, the effective maturity date may be earlier than the stated maturity date. | |||
(4) Loan participations and assignments; may be subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. The total value of all such loans, including those in "Other securities," was $686,496,000, which represented 5.95% of the net assets of the fund. | |||
(5) Payment in kind; the issuer has the option of paying additional securities in lieu of cash. | |||
(6) Purchased in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. This security (acquired on 6/26/2008-7/15/2008 at a cost of $61,275,000) may be subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. The total value of all such securities, including those in "Other securities," was $74,120,000, which represented .64% of the net assets of the fund. | |||
(7) Step bond; coupon rate will increase at a later date. | |||
(8) Valued under fair value procedures adopted by authority of the board of trustees. The total value of all such securities, including those in "Other securities," was $994,753,000, which represented 8.63% of the net assets of the fund. | |||
(9) Security did not produce income during the last 12 months. | |||
(10) Unaffiliated issuer at 9/30/2008. | |||
Key to symbol | |||
€ = Euros | |||
The industry classifications shown in the summary investment portfolio were obtained from sources believed to be reliable and are not covered by the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements |
Financial statements
Statement of assets and liabilities | ||||||||
at September 30, 2008 | (dollars in thousands) | |||||||
Assets: | ||||||||
Investment securities, at value: | ||||||||
Unaffiliated issuers (cost: $13,667,112) | $ | 11,310,871 | ||||||
Affiliated issuers (cost: $20,282) | 3,690 | $ | 11,314,561 | |||||
Cash | 2,199 | |||||||
Unrealized gain on forward currency contracts | 820 | |||||||
Receivables for: | ||||||||
Sales of investments | 56,729 | |||||||
Sales of fund's shares | 19,797 | |||||||
Dividends and interest | 263,343 | 339,869 | ||||||
11,657,449 | ||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||
Unrealized loss on forward currency contracts | 160 | |||||||
Payables for: | ||||||||
Purchases of investments | 56,825 | |||||||
Repurchases of fund's shares | 53,099 | |||||||
Dividends on fund's shares | 10,567 | |||||||
Investment advisory services | 3,140 | |||||||
Services provided by affiliates | 5,175 | |||||||
Trustees' deferred compensation | 138 | |||||||
Other | 100 | 129,044 | ||||||
Net assets at September 30, 2008 | $ | 11,528,245 | ||||||
Net assets consist of: | ||||||||
Capital paid in on shares of beneficial interest | $ | 14,098,671 | ||||||
Undistributed net investment income | 42,869 | |||||||
Accumulated net realized loss | (239,879 | ) | ||||||
Net unrealized depreciation | (2,373,416 | ) | ||||||
Net assets at September 30, 2008 | $ | 11,528,245 | ||||||
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per-share amounts) | ||||||||||||
Shares of beneficial interest issued and outstanding (no stated par value) - unlimited shares authorized (1,151,687 total shares outstanding) | ||||||||||||
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share* | ||||||||||
Class A | $ | 8,073,976 | 806,601 | $ | 10.01 | |||||||
Class B | 557,145 | 55,659 | 10.01 | |||||||||
Class C | 889,879 | 88,900 | 10.01 | |||||||||
Class F-1 | 1,203,859 | 120,267 | 10.01 | |||||||||
Class F-2 | 13,572 | 1,356 | 10.01 | |||||||||
Class 529-A | 120,053 | 11,993 | 10.01 | |||||||||
Class 529-B | 18,320 | 1,830 | 10.01 | |||||||||
Class 529-C | 49,357 | 4,931 | 10.01 | |||||||||
Class 529-E | 6,746 | 674 | 10.01 | |||||||||
Class 529-F-1 | 5,582 | 558 | 10.01 | |||||||||
Class R-1 | 11,892 | 1,188 | 10.01 | |||||||||
Class R-2 | 127,613 | 12,749 | 10.01 | |||||||||
Class R-3 | 185,491 | 18,531 | 10.01 | |||||||||
Class R-4 | 125,166 | 12,504 | 10.01 | |||||||||
Class R-5 | 139,594 | 13,946 | 10.01 | |||||||||
(*) Maximum offering price and redemption price per share were equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Classes A and 529-A, for which the maximum offering prices per share were $10.40 each. | ||||||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements |
Statement of operations | ||||||||
for the year ended September 30, 2008 | (dollars in thousands) | |||||||
Investment income: | ||||||||
Income: | ||||||||
Interest (net of non-U.S. taxes of $553; also includes $6,925 from affiliates) | $ | 1,109,881 | ||||||
Dividends | 12,792 | $ | 1,122,673 | |||||
Fees and expenses*: | ||||||||
Investment advisory services | 42,247 | |||||||
Distribution services | 44,224 | |||||||
Transfer agent services | 10,831 | |||||||
Administrative services | 5,442 | |||||||
Reports to shareholders | 551 | |||||||
Registration statement and prospectus | 595 | |||||||
Postage, stationery and supplies | 1,144 | |||||||
Trustees' compensation | 82 | |||||||
Auditing and legal | 140 | |||||||
Custodian | 373 | |||||||
State and local taxes | 133 | |||||||
Other | 88 | |||||||
Total fees and expenses before reimbursements/waivers | 105,850 | |||||||
Less reimbursements/waivers of fees and expenses: | ||||||||
Investment advisory services | 4,225 | |||||||
Administrative services | 262 | |||||||
Total fees and expenses after reimbursements/waivers | 101,363 | |||||||
Net investment income | 1,021,310 | |||||||
Net realized loss and unrealized depreciation on investments and currency: | ||||||||
Net realized loss on: | ||||||||
Investments (including $84,482 net gain from affiliates) | (209,017 | ) | ||||||
Currency transactions | (1,946 | ) | (210,963 | ) | ||||
Net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on: | ||||||||
Investments | (2,410,779 | ) | ||||||
Currency translations | 618 | (2,410,161 | ) | |||||
Net realized loss and unrealized depreciation on investments and currency | (2,621,124 | ) | ||||||
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations | $ | (1,599,814 | ) | |||||
(*) Additional information related to class-specific fees and expenses is included in the Notes to Financial Statements. | ||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements | ||||||||
Statements of changes in net assets | (dollars in thousands) | |||||||
Year ended September 30 | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Operations: | ||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 1,021,310 | $ | 925,790 | ||||
Net realized (loss) gain on investments and currency transactions | (210,963 | ) | 154,033 | |||||
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and currency translations | (2,410,161 | ) | (173,969 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations | (1,599,814 | ) | 905,854 | |||||
Dividends and distributions paid or accrued to shareholders: | ||||||||
Dividends from net investment income | (1,018,627 | ) | (914,620 | ) | ||||
Distributions from net realized gain on investments | (25,932 | ) | - | |||||
Total dividends and distributions paid or accrued to shareholders | (1,044,559 | ) | (914,620 | ) | ||||
Net capital share transactions | 887,582 | 1,967,445 | ||||||
Total (decrease) increase in net assets | (1,756,791 | ) | 1,958,679 | |||||
Net assets: | ||||||||
Beginning of year | 13,285,036 | 11,326,357 | ||||||
End of year (including undistributed net investment income: $42,869 and $37,476, respectively) | $ | 11,528,245 | $ | 13,285,036 | ||||
See Notes to Financial Statements |
Notes to financial statements
1. Organization and significant accounting policies
Organization – American High-Income Trust (the "fund") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end, diversified management investment company. The fund seeks a high level of current income and, secondarily, capital appreciation through a diversified, carefully supervised portfolio consisting primarily of lower rated, higher risk corporate bonds.
The fund offers 15 share classes consisting of five retail share classes, five 529 college savings plan share classes and five retirement plan share classes. The 529 college savings plan share classes (529-A, 529-B, 529-C, 529-E and 529-F-1) can be used to save for college education. The five retirement plan share classes (R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 and R-5) are generally offered only through eligible employer-sponsored retirement plans. The fund’s share classes are described below:
Share class | Initial sales charge | Contingent deferred sales charge upon redemption | Conversion feature |
Classes A and 529-A | Up to 3.75% | None (except 1% for certain redemptions within one year of purchase without an initial sales charge) | None |
Classes B and 529-B | None | Declines from 5% to 0% for redemptions within six years of purchase | Classes B and 529-B convert to Classes A and 529-A, respectively, after eight years |
Class C | None | 1% for redemptions within one year of purchase | Class C converts to Class F-1 after 10 years |
Class 529-C | None | 1% for redemptions within one year of purchase | None |
Class 529-E | None | None | None |
Classes F-1, F-2 and 529-F-1 | None | None | None |
Classes R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 and R-5 | None | None | None |
On August 1, 2008, the fund made an additional retail share class (Class F-2) available for sale pursuant to an amendment to its registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In addition, Class F shares were renamed Class F-1 and Class 529-F shares were renamed Class 529-F-1. Refer to the fund’s prospectus for more details.
Holders of all share classes have equal pro rata rights to assets, dividends and liquidation proceeds. Each share class has identical voting rights, except for the exclusive right to vote on matters affecting only its class. Share classes have different fees and expenses ("class-specific fees and expenses"), primarily due to different arrangements for distribution, administrative and shareholder services. Differences in class-specific fees and expenses will result in differences in net investment income and, therefore, the payment of different per-share dividends by each class.
Significant accounting policies – The financial statements have been prepared to comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the fund:
Security valuation – Equity securities are valued at the official closing price of, or the last reported sale price on, the exchange or market on which such securities are traded, as of the close of business on the day the securities are being valued or, lacking any sales, at the last available bid price. Prices for each security are taken from the principal exchange or market in which the security trades. Fixed-income securities, including short-term securities purchased with more than 60 days left to maturity, are valued at prices obtained from an independent pricing service when such prices are available. However, where the investment adviser deems it appropriate, such securities will be valued at the mean quoted bid and asked prices (or bid prices, if asked prices are not available) or at prices for securities of comparable maturity, quality and type. Securities with both fixed-income and equity characteristics, or equity securities traded principally among fixed-income dealers, are valued in the manner described above for either equity or fixed-income securities, depending on which method is deemed most appropriate by the investment adviser. Short-term securities purchased within 60 days to maturity are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. The value of short-term securities originally purchased with maturities greater than 60 days is determined based on an amortized value to par when they reach 60 days or less remaining to maturity. Forward currency contracts are valued at the mean of representative quoted bid and asked prices.
Securities and other assets for which representative market quotations are not readily available or are considered unreliable by the investment adviser are fair valued as determined in good faith under procedures adopted by authority of the fund's board of trustees. Various factors may be reviewed in order to make a good faith determination of a security’s fair value. These factors include, but are not limited to, the type and cost of the security; contractual or legal restrictions on resale of the security; relevant financial or business developments of the issuer; actively traded similar or related securities; conversion or exchange rights on the security; related corporate actions; significant events occurring after the close of trading in the security; and changes in overall market conditions.
Security transactions and related investment income – Security transactions are recorded by the fund as of the date the trades are executed with brokers. Realized gains and losses from security transactions are determined based on the specific identified cost of the securities. In the event a security is purchased with a delayed payment date, the fund will segregate liquid assets sufficient to meet its payment obligations. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. Market discounts, premiums and original issue discounts on fixed-income securities are amortized daily over the expected life of the security.
Class allocations – Income, fees and expenses (other than class-specific fees and expenses) are allocated daily among the various share classes based on the relative value of their settled shares. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily among the various share classes based on their relative net assets. Class-specific fees and expenses, such as distribution, administrative and shareholder services, are charged directly to the respective share class.
Dividends and distributions to shareholders – Dividends paid to shareholders are declared daily from net investment income and are paid to shareholders monthly. Distributions paid to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Currency translation – Assets and liabilities, including investment securities, denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the valuation date. Purchases and sales of investment securities and income and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates on the dates of such transactions. On the accompanying financial statements, the effects of changes in exchange rates on investment securities are included with the net realized gain or loss and net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments. The realized gain or loss and unrealized appreciation or depreciation resulting from all other transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are disclosed separately.
Forward currency contracts – The fund may enter into forward currency contracts, which represent agreements to exchange currencies on specific future dates at predetermined rates. The fund enters into these contracts to manage its exposure to changes in exchange rates arising from investments denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. Upon entering into these contracts, risks may arise from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts and from possible movements in exchange rates. Due to these risks, the fund could incur losses up to the entire contract amount, which may exceed the net unrealized value shown on the accompanying financial statements. On a daily basis, the fund values forward currency contracts based on the applicable exchange rates and records unrealized gains or losses. The fund records realized gains or losses at the time the forward contract is closed or offset by another contract with the same broker for the same settlement date and currency. Closed forward currency contracts that have not reached their expiration date are included in the respective receivables for sales or payables for purchases of investment securities in the statement of assets and liabilities.
Loan transactions – The fund may enter into loan transactions in which the fund acquires a loan either through an agent, by assignment from another holder, or as a participation interest in another holder's portion of a loan. The loan is often administered by a financial institution that acts as agent for the holders of the loan, and the fund may be required to receive approval from the agent and/or borrower prior to the sale of the investment. The loan's interest rate and maturity date may change based on the terms of the loan, including potential early payments of principal. Risks may arise due to the delayed settlement date of the loan transaction and the ability of the agent and/or borrower to meet the obligations of the loan.
2. Risk Factors
Investing in the fund may involve certain risks including, but not limited to, those described below.
The values of, and the income generated by, most debt securities held by the fund may be affected by changing interest rates and by changes in the effective maturities and credit ratings of these securities. For example, the values of debt securities in the fund's portfolio generally will decline when interest rates rise and increase when interest rates fall. In addition, falling interest rates may cause an issuer to redeem, "call" or refinance a security before its stated maturity, which may result in the fund having to reinvest the proceeds in lower yielding securities. Debt securities are also subject to credit risk, which is the possibility that the credit strength of an issuer will weaken and/or an issuer of a debt security will fail to make timely payments of principal or interest and the security will go into default. Lower quality or longer maturity debt securities generally have higher rates of interest and may be subject to greater price fluctuations than higher quality or shorter maturity debt securities. There may be little trading in the secondary market for particular debt securities, which may make them more difficult to value or sell.
The prices of, and the income generated by, securities held by the fund may decline in response to certain events, including those directly involving the companies whose securities are owned by the fund; conditions affecting the general economy; overall market changes; local, regional or global political, social or economic instability; and currency, interest rate and commodity price fluctuations. Investments in securities issued by entities based outside the United States may be subject to the risks described above to a greater extent and may also be affected by currency controls; different accounting, auditing, financial reporting, and legal standards and practices in some countries; expropriation; changes in tax policy; greater market volatility; differing securities market structures; higher transaction costs; and various administrative difficulties, such as delays in clearing and settling portfolio transactions or in receiving payments of dividends. These risks may be heightened in connection with investments in developing countries.
3. Taxation and distributions
Federal income taxation – The fund complies with the requirements under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to mutual funds and intends to distribute substantially all of its net taxable income and net capital gains each year. The fund is not subject to income taxes to the extent such distributions are made. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required.
As of and during the period ended September 30, 2008, the fund did not have a liability for any unrecognized tax benefits. The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the statement of operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
The fund is not subject to examination by U.S. federal tax authorities for tax years before 2004, by state tax authorities for tax years before 2003 and by tax authorities outside the U.S. for tax years before 2004.
Non-U.S. taxation – Dividend and interest income is recorded net of non-U.S. taxes paid. Realized and unrealized gains on securities in certain countries are subject to non-U.S. taxes. The fund records a liability based on realized and unrealized gains to provide for potential non-U.S. taxes payable on these securities. As of September 30, 2008, there was no liability for non-U.S. taxes based on realized or unrealized gains. For the year ended September 30, 2008, non-U.S. taxes paid on realized gains were $124,000.
Distributions – Distributions paid to shareholders are based on net investment income and net realized gains determined on a tax basis, which may differ from net investment income and net realized gains for financial reporting purposes. These differences are due primarily to differing treatment for items such as currency gains and losses; short-term capital gains and losses; capital losses related to sales of certain securities within 30 days of purchase; unrealized appreciation of certain investments in securities outside the U.S.; net capital losses; and income on certain investments. The fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the year in which the net investment income and net realized gains are recorded by the fund for financial reporting purposes.
During the year ended September 30, 2008, the fund reclassified $2,826,000 from accumulated net realized loss to undistributed net investment income and $116,000 from undistributed net investment income to capital paid in on shares of beneficial interest to align financial reporting with tax reporting.
As of September 30, 2008, the tax basis components of distributable earnings, unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and cost of investment securities were as follows:
(dollars in thousands) | ||||
Undistributed ordinary income | $ | 73,349 | ||
Post-October capital loss deferrals (realized during the period November 1, 2007, through September 30, 2008)* | (227,578 | ) | ||
Gross unrealized appreciation on investment securities | 88,378 | |||
Gross unrealized depreciation on investment securities | (2,485,515 | ) | ||
Net unrealized depreciation on investment securities | (2,397,137 | ) | ||
Cost of investment securities | 13,711,698 | |||
*These deferrals are considered incurred in the subsequent year. |
The tax character of distributions paid or accrued to shareholders was as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year ended September 30, 2008 | Year ended September 30, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ordinary income | Long-term capital gains | Total distributions paid or accrued | Ordinary income | Long-term capital gains | Total distributions paid or accrued | |||||||||||||||||||
Share class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 730,206 | $ | 18,402 | $ | 748,608 | $ | 673,938 | $ | - | $ | 673,938 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 49,409 | 1,431 | 50,840 | 51,158 | - | 51,158 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class C | 72,541 | 2,038 | 74,579 | 64,794 | - | 64,794 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class F-1 | 102,194 | 2,457 | 104,651 | 75,998 | - | 75,998 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class F-2* | 89 | - | 89 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-A | 10,246 | 252 | 10,498 | 8,047 | - | 8,047 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-B | 1,467 | 41 | 1,508 | 1,272 | - | 1,272 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-C | 3,831 | 106 | 3,937 | 3,073 | - | 3,073 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-E | 559 | 14 | 573 | 432 | - | 432 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-F-1 | 475 | 11 | 486 | 355 | - | 355 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class R-1 | 919 | 25 | 944 | 680 | - | 680 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class R-2 | 10,006 | 274 | 10,280 | 8,052 | - | 8,052 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class R-3 | 15,162 | 381 | 15,543 | 11,472 | - | 11,472 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class R-4 | 10,337 | 246 | 10,583 | 7,040 | - | 7,040 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class R-5 | 11,186 | 254 | 11,440 | 8,309 | - | 8,309 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,018,627 | $ | 25,932 | $ | 1,044,559 | $ | 914,620 | $ | - | $ | 914,620 | ||||||||||||
*Class F-2 was offered beginning August 1, 2008. |
4. Fees and transactions with related parties
Capital Research and Management Company ("CRMC"), the fund’s investment adviser, is the parent company of American Funds Service Company® ("AFS"), the fund’s transfer agent, and American Funds Distributors,® Inc. ("AFD"), the principal underwriter of the fund’s shares.
Investment advisory services - The Investment Advisory and Service Agreement with CRMC provides for monthly fees accrued daily. These fees were based on a declining series of annual rates beginning with 0.30% on the first $60 million of daily net assets and decreasing to 0.14% on such assets in excess of $10 billion. The board of trustees approved an amended agreement effective November 1, 2007, decreasing the annual rate on net assets in excess of $15 billion from a rate of 0.14% to a rate of 0.135%. The agreement also provides for monthly fees, accrued daily, based on a declining series of rates beginning with 3.00% on the first $8,333,333 of the fund's monthly gross income and decreasing to 1.50% on such income in excess of $50 million. CRMC is currently waiving 10% of investment advisory services fees. During the year ended September 30, 2008, total investment advisory services fees waived by CRMC were $4,225,000. As a result, the fee shown on the accompanying financial statements of $42,247,000, which was equivalent to an annualized rate of 0.331%, was reduced to $38,022,000, or 0.298% of average daily net assets.
Class-specific fees and expenses – Expenses that are specific to individual share classes are accrued directly to the respective share class. The principal class-specific fees and expenses are described below:
Distribution services – The fund has adopted plans of distribution for all share classes, except Classes F-2 and R-5. Under the plans, the board of trustees approves certain categories of expenses that are used to finance activities primarily intended to sell fund shares and service existing accounts. The plans provide for payments, based on an annualized percentage of average daily net assets, ranging from 0.30% to 1.00% as noted below. In some cases, the board of trustees has limited the amounts that may be paid to less than the maximum allowed by the plans. All share classes except Classes F-2 and R-5 may use up to 0.25% of average daily net assets to pay service fees, or to compensate AFD for paying service fees, to firms that have entered into agreements with AFD to provide certain shareholder services. The remaining amounts available to be paid under each plan are paid to dealers to compensate them for their sales activities.
For Classes A and 529-A, the board of trustees has also approved the reimbursement of dealer and wholesaler commissions paid by AFD for certain shares sold without a sales charge. These classes reimburse AFD for amounts billed within the prior 15 months but only to the extent that the overall annual expense limit of 0.30% is not exceeded. As of September 30, 2008, there were no unreimbursed expenses subject to reimbursement for Classes A or 529-A.
Share class | Currently approved limits | Plan limits |
Class A | 0.30% | 0.30% |
Class 529-A | 0.30 | 0.50 |
Classes B and 529-B | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Classes C, 529-C and R-1 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Class R-2 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
Classes 529-E and R-3 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
Classes F-1, 529-F-1 and R-4 | 0.25 | 0.50 |
Transfer agent services – The fund has a transfer agent agreement with AFS for Classes A and B. Under this agreement, these share classes compensate AFS for transfer agent services including shareholder recordkeeping, communications and transaction processing. AFS is also compensated for certain transfer agent services provided to all other share classes from the administrative services fees paid to CRMC described below.
Administrative services – The fund has an administrative services agreement with CRMC to provide transfer agent and other related shareholder services for all share classes other than Classes A and B. Each relevant share class pays CRMC annual fees up to 0.15% (0.10% for Class R-5) based on its respective average daily net assets. Each relevant share class also pays AFS additional amounts for certain transfer agent services. CRMC and AFS may use these fees to compensate third parties for performing these services. CRMC has agreed to pay AFS on the fund's behalf for a portion of the transfer agent services fees for some of the retirement plan share classes. For the year ended September 30, 2008, the total administrative services fees paid by CRMC were $262,000 for Class R-2. Administrative services fees are presented gross of any payments made by CRMC. Each 529 share class is subject to an additional annual administrative services fee of 0.10% of its respective average daily net assets; this fee is payable to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the maintenance of the 529 college savings plan. Although these amounts are included with administrative services fees on the accompanying financial statements, the Commonwealth of Virginia is not considered a related party.
Expenses under the agreements described on the previous page for the year ended September 30, 2008, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Share class | Distribution services | Transfer agent services | Administrative services | ||
CRMC administrative services | Transfer agent services | Commonwealth of Virginia administrative services | |||
Class A | $20,976 | $10,059 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Class B | 6,720 | 772 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Class C | 9,930 | Included in administrative services | $1,379 | $207 | Not applicable |
Class F-1 | 3,147 | 1,530 | 247 | Not applicable | |
Class F-2* | Not applicable | 2 | -† | Not applicable | |
Class 529-A | 233 | 108 | 21 | $127 | |
Class 529-B | 202 | 18 | 7 | 20 | |
Class 529-C | 528 | 45 | 16 | 53 | |
Class 529-E | 36 | 6 | 1 | 7 | |
Class 529-F-1 | - | 5 | 1 | 6 | |
Class R-1 | 126 | 9 | 17 | Not applicable | |
Class R-2 | 1,026 | 200 | 625 | Not applicable | |
Class R-3 | 979 | 270 | 168 | Not applicable | |
Class R-4 | 321 | 180 | 31 | Not applicable | |
Class R-5 | Not applicable | 125 | 11 | Not applicable | |
Total | $44,224 | $10,831 | $3,877 | $1,352 | $213 |
*Class F-2 was offered beginning August 1, 2008.
†Amount less than one thousand.
Trustees’ deferred compensation – Since the adoption of the deferred compensation plan in 1993, trustees who are unaffiliated with CRMC may elect to defer the cash payment of part or all of their compensation. These deferred amounts, which remain as liabilities of the fund, are treated as if invested in shares of the fund or other American Funds. These amounts represent general, unsecured liabilities of the fund and vary according to the total returns of the selected funds. Trustees’ compensation of $82,000, shown on the accompanying financial statements, includes $99,000 in current fees (either paid in cash or deferred) and a net decrease of $17,000 in the value of the deferred amounts.
Affiliated officers and trustees – Officers and certain trustees of the fund are or may be considered to be affiliated with CRMC, AFS and AFD. No affiliated officers or trustees received any compensation directly from the fund.
5. Capital share transactions
Capital share transactions in the fund were as follows (dollars and shares in thousands):
Share class | Sales(*) | Reinvestments of dividends and distributions | Repurchases(*) | Net increase (decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 1,832,026 | 159,405 | $ | 607,542 | 53,246 | $ | (2,022,226 | ) | (176,467 | ) | $ | 417,342 | 36,184 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class B | 58,432 | 5,104 | 37,258 | 3,262 | (158,870 | ) | (13,890 | ) | (63,180 | ) | (5,524 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Class C | 246,125 | 21,376 | 55,146 | 4,833 | (250,750 | ) | (21,944 | ) | 50,521 | 4,265 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class F-1 | 734,169 | 63,613 | 80,516 | 7,080 | (507,861 | ) | (44,805 | ) | 306,824 | 25,888 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class F-2† | 15,292 | 1,418 | 62 | 6 | (708 | ) | (68 | ) | 14,646 | 1,356 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-A | 28,484 | 2,472 | 10,354 | 909 | (16,441 | ) | (1,438 | ) | 22,397 | 1,943 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-B | 2,433 | 211 | 1,488 | 130 | (2,201 | ) | (193 | ) | 1,720 | 148 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-C | 13,564 | 1,179 | 3,879 | 340 | (9,536 | ) | (836 | ) | 7,907 | 683 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-E | 1,899 | 165 | 565 | 50 | (1,241 | ) | (110 | ) | 1,223 | 105 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-F-1 | 1,651 | 143 | 479 | 42 | (944 | ) | (81 | ) | 1,186 | 104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R-1 | 5,262 | 459 | 908 | 80 | (4,723 | ) | (410 | ) | 1,447 | 129 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R-2 | 52,030 | 4,528 | 10,105 | 886 | (44,002 | ) | (3,829 | ) | 18,133 | 1,585 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R-3 | 103,670 | 8,970 | 15,333 | 1,345 | (78,446 | ) | (6,830 | ) | 40,557 | 3,485 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R-4 | 71,390 | 6,189 | 10,447 | 917 | (47,098 | ) | (4,125 | ) | 34,739 | 2,981 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R-5 | 91,071 | 7,933 | 10,522 | 925 | (69,473 | ) | (6,009 | ) | 32,120 | 2,849 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(decrease) | $ | 3,257,498 | 283,165 | $ | 844,604 | 74,051 | $ | (3,214,520 | ) | (281,035 | ) | $ | 887,582 | 76,181 | ||||||||||||||||||
Year ended September 30, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 2,599,636 | 206,346 | $ | 536,365 | 42,801 | $ | (1,902,067 | ) | (152,186 | ) | $ | 1,233,934 | 96,961 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class B | 100,652 | 7,985 | 35,448 | 2,827 | (142,227 | ) | (11,372 | ) | (6,127 | ) | (560 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Class C | 335,555 | 26,621 | 45,464 | 3,628 | (204,959 | ) | (16,409 | ) | 176,060 | 13,840 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class F-1 | 567,759 | 45,127 | 55,726 | 4,448 | (299,941 | ) | (23,998 | ) | 323,544 | 25,577 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-A | 38,433 | 3,050 | 8,058 | 643 | (14,230 | ) | (1,139 | ) | 32,261 | 2,554 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-B | 3,620 | 287 | 1,275 | 102 | (1,775 | ) | (142 | ) | 3,120 | 247 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-C | 17,218 | 1,366 | 3,076 | 245 | (7,875 | ) | (630 | ) | 12,419 | 981 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-E | 2,154 | 172 | 432 | 35 | (851 | ) | (68 | ) | 1,735 | 139 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529-F-1 | 2,248 | 179 | 354 | 28 | (1,015 | ) | (81 | ) | 1,587 | 126 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R-1 | 6,443 | 513 | 673 | 54 | (2,333 | ) | (185 | ) | 4,783 | 382 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R-2 | 64,051 | 5,089 | 8,017 | 640 | (39,894 | ) | (3,180 | ) | 32,174 | 2,549 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R-3 | 97,675 | 7,775 | 11,452 | 914 | (56,548 | ) | (4,518 | ) | 52,579 | 4,171 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R-4 | 72,689 | 5,787 | 7,051 | 563 | (34,470 | ) | (2,750 | ) | 45,270 | 3,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R-5 | 79,624 | 6,325 | 7,422 | 593 | (32,940 | ) | (2,638 | ) | 54,106 | 4,280 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(decrease) | $ | 3,987,757 | 316,622 | $ | 720,813 | 57,521 | $ | (2,741,125 | ) | (219,296 | ) | $ | 1,967,445 | 154,847 | ||||||||||||||||||
*Includes exchanges between share classes of the fund. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
†Class F-2 was offered beginning August 1, 2008. |
6. Forward currency contracts
As of September 30, 2008, the fund had open forward currency contracts to sell currencies as follows (amounts in thousands):
Contract amount | U.S. valuation at September 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Receive | Deliver | Amount | Unrealized appreciation | |||||||||||||
Sales: | ||||||||||||||||
Euros expiring 10/10 to 12/16/2008 | $ | 47,965 | € | 33,521 | $ | 47,305 | $ | 660 |
7. Investment transactions
The fund made purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities and U.S. government obligations, if any, of $4,057,688,000 and $4,079,624,000, respectively, during the year ended September 30, 2008.
Financial highlights (1)
(Loss) income from investment operations(2) | Dividends and distributions | |||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | Net investment income | Net (losses) gains on securities (both realized and unrealized) | Total from investment operations | Dividends (from net investment income) | Distributions (from capital gains) | Total dividends and distributions | Net asset value, end of period | Total return (3) (4) | Net assets, end of period (in millions) | Ratio of expenses to average net assets before reimbursements /waivers | Ratio of expenses to average net assets after reimbursements /waivers (4) | Ratio of net income to average net assets (4) | ||||
Class A: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2008 | $12.35 | $.93 | $ | (2.32) | $(1.39) | $(.93) | $(.02) | $(.95) | $10.01 | (11.87)% | $8,074 | .70% | .67% | 8.14% | ||
Year ended 9/30/2007 | 12.30 | .93 | .04 | .97 | (.92) | - | (.92) | 12.35 | 7.99 | 9,516 | .69 | .66 | 7.35 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2006 | 12.27 | .92 | .05 | .97 | (.94) | - | (.94) | 12.30 | 8.26 | 8,285 | .69 | .65 | 7.52 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .89 | .01 | .90 | (.89) | - | (.89) | 12.27 | 7.54 | 7,448 | .68 | .65 | 7.17 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .87 | .35 | 1.22 | (.84) | - | (.84) | 12.26 | 10.57 | 6,920 | .67 | .67 | 7.19 | |||
Class B: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2008 | 12.35 | .85 | (2.32) | (1.47) | (.85) | (.02) | (.87) | 10.01 | (12.55) | 557 | 1.47 | 1.44 | 7.37 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2007 | 12.30 | .83 | .04 | .87 | (.82) | - | (.82) | 12.35 | 7.19 | 756 | 1.44 | 1.41 | 6.62 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2006 | 12.27 | .83 | .05 | .88 | (.85) | - | (.85) | 12.30 | 7.44 | 760 | 1.46 | 1.42 | 6.76 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .80 | .01 | .81 | (.80) | - | (.80) | 12.27 | 6.72 | 771 | 1.45 | 1.43 | 6.39 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .78 | .35 | 1.13 | (.75) | - | (.75) | 12.26 | 9.71 | 794 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 6.40 | |||
Class C: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2008 | 12.35 | .84 | (2.32) | (1.48) | (.84) | (.02) | (.86) | 10.01 | (12.59) | 890 | 1.52 | 1.48 | 7.32 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2007 | 12.30 | .83 | .04 | .87 | (.82) | - | (.82) | 12.35 | 7.14 | 1,045 | 1.48 | 1.45 | 6.55 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2006 | 12.27 | .82 | .05 | .87 | (.84) | - | (.84) | 12.30 | 7.39 | 871 | 1.50 | 1.46 | 6.71 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .79 | .01 | .80 | (.79) | - | (.79) | 12.27 | 6.65 | 804 | 1.51 | 1.49 | 6.32 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .77 | .35 | 1.12 | (.74) | - | (.74) | 12.26 | 9.62 | 812 | 1.54 | 1.54 | 6.31 | |||
Class F-1: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2008 | 12.35 | .93 | (2.32) | (1.39) | (.93) | (.02) | (.95) | 10.01 | (11.90) | 1,204 | .74 | .70 | 8.09 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2007 | 12.30 | .92 | .04 | .96 | (.91) | - | (.91) | 12.35 | 7.98 | 1,166 | .70 | .67 | 7.32 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2006 | 12.27 | .92 | .05 | .97 | (.94) | - | (.94) | 12.30 | 8.23 | 846 | .71 | .68 | 7.47 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .88 | .01 | .89 | (.88) | - | (.88) | 12.27 | 7.45 | 637 | .76 | .74 | 7.07 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .86 | .35 | 1.21 | (.83) | - | (.83) | 12.26 | 10.44 | 578 | .79 | .78 | 7.05 | |||
Class F-2: | ||||||||||||||||
Period from 8/4/2008 to 9/30/2008 | 11.01 | .14 | (1.00) | (.86) | (.14) | - | (.14) | 10.01 | (7.84) | 13 | .08 | .07 | 1.34 | |||
Class 529-A: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2008 | 12.35 | .93 | (2.32) | (1.39) | (.93) | (.02) | (.95) | 10.01 | (11.91) | 120 | .74 | .71 | 8.11 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2007 | 12.30 | .92 | .04 | .96 | (.91) | - | (.91) | 12.35 | 7.92 | 124 | .76 | .72 | 7.30 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2006 | 12.27 | .91 | .05 | .96 | (.93) | - | (.93) | 12.30 | 8.21 | 92 | .74 | .70 | 7.47 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .88 | .01 | .89 | (.88) | - | (.88) | 12.27 | 7.44 | 66 | .77 | .75 | 7.09 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .86 | .35 | 1.21 | (.83) | - | (.83) | 12.26 | 10.48 | 48 | .76 | .76 | 7.12 | |||
Class 529-B: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2008 | 12.35 | .84 | (2.32) | (1.48) | (.84) | (.02) | (.86) | 10.01 | (12.64) | 18 | 1.58 | 1.55 | 7.26 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2007 | 12.30 | .82 | .04 | .86 | (.81) | - | (.81) | 12.35 | 7.06 | 21 | 1.56 | 1.53 | 6.50 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2006 | 12.27 | .81 | .05 | .86 | (.83) | - | (.83) | 12.30 | 7.30 | 18 | 1.58 | 1.55 | 6.63 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .77 | .01 | .78 | (.77) | - | (.77) | 12.27 | 6.52 | 15 | 1.64 | 1.61 | 6.22 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .75 | .35 | 1.10 | (.72) | - | (.72) | 12.26 | 9.47 | 12 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 6.20 | |||
Class 529-C: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2008 | 12.35 | .84 | (2.32) | (1.48) | (.84) | (.02) | (.86) | 10.01 | (12.64) | 49 | 1.57 | 1.54 | 7.27 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2007 | 12.30 | .82 | .04 | .86 | (.81) | - | (.81) | 12.35 | 7.07 | 52 | 1.55 | 1.52 | 6.50 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2006 | 12.27 | .81 | .05 | .86 | (.83) | - | (.83) | 12.30 | 7.31 | 40 | 1.57 | 1.54 | 6.64 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .77 | .01 | .78 | (.77) | - | (.77) | 12.27 | 6.53 | 32 | 1.63 | 1.60 | 6.23 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .75 | .35 | 1.10 | (.72) | - | (.72) | 12.26 | 9.49 | 25 | 1.66 | 1.66 | 6.21 | |||
Class 529-E: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2008 | 12.35 | .90 | (2.32) | (1.42) | (.90) | (.02) | (.92) | 10.01 | (12.18) | 7 | 1.06 | 1.02 | 7.79 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2007 | 12.30 | .88 | .04 | .92 | (.87) | - | (.87) | 12.35 | 7.62 | 7 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 7.01 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2006 | 12.27 | .88 | .05 | .93 | (.90) | - | (.90) | 12.30 | 7.88 | 5 | 1.05 | 1.01 | 7.17 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .84 | .01 | .85 | (.84) | - | (.84) | 12.27 | 7.09 | 4 | 1.10 | 1.07 | 6.77 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .82 | .35 | 1.17 | (.79) | - | (.79) | 12.26 | 10.06 | 3 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 6.75 | |||
Class 529-F-1: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2008 | $12.35 | $.95 | $ | (2.32) | $(1.37) | $(.95) | $(.02) | $(.97) | $10.01 | (11.74)% | $6 | .56% | .52% | 8.29% | ||
Year ended 9/30/2007 | 12.30 | .94 | .04 | .98 | (.93) | - | (.93) | 12.35 | 8.15 | 6 | .54 | .51 | 7.51 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2006 | 12.27 | .94 | .05 | .99 | (.96) | - | (.96) | 12.30 | 8.41 | 4 | .55 | .52 | 7.66 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .88 | .01 | .89 | (.88) | - | (.88) | 12.27 | 7.45 | 3 | .75 | .72 | 7.13 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .85 | .35 | 1.20 | (.82) | - | (.82) | 12.26 | 10.34 | 2 | .88 | .88 | 6.99 | |||
Class R-1: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2008 | 12.35 | .84 | (2.32) | (1.48) | (.84) | (.02) | (.86) | 10.01 | (12.62) | 12 | 1.55 | 1.52 | 7.29 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2007 | 12.30 | .82 | .04 | .86 | (.81) | - | (.81) | 12.35 | 7.08 | 13 | 1.57 | 1.52 | 6.50 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2006 | 12.27 | .82 | .05 | .87 | (.84) | - | (.84) | 12.30 | 7.35 | 8 | 1.59 | 1.50 | 6.68 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .78 | .01 | .79 | (.78) | - | (.78) | 12.27 | 6.61 | 6 | 1.61 | 1.52 | 6.35 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .76 | .35 | 1.11 | (.73) | - | (.73) | 12.26 | 9.59 | 3 | 1.68 | 1.56 | 6.32 | |||
Class R-2: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2008 | 12.35 | .84 | (2.32) | (1.48) | (.84) | (.02) | (.86) | 10.01 | (12.58) | 128 | 1.70 | 1.48 | 7.34 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2007 | 12.30 | .82 | .04 | .86 | (.81) | - | (.81) | 12.35 | 7.13 | 138 | 1.69 | 1.47 | 6.56 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2006 | 12.27 | .82 | .05 | .87 | (.84) | - | (.84) | 12.30 | 7.37 | 106 | 1.90 | 1.48 | 6.70 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .79 | .01 | .80 | (.79) | - | (.79) | 12.27 | 6.64 | 74 | 1.94 | 1.49 | 6.36 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .77 | .35 | 1.12 | (.74) | - | (.74) | 12.26 | 9.63 | 44 | 2.10 | 1.53 | 6.36 | |||
Class R-3: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2008 | 12.35 | .89 | (2.32) | (1.43) | (.89) | (.02) | (.91) | 10.01 | (12.20) | 185 | 1.07 | 1.04 | 7.77 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2007 | 12.30 | .88 | .04 | .92 | (.87) | - | (.87) | 12.35 | 7.58 | 186 | 1.07 | 1.04 | 6.98 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2006 | 12.27 | .87 | .05 | .92 | (.89) | - | (.89) | 12.30 | 7.84 | 134 | 1.08 | 1.05 | 7.13 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .84 | .01 | .85 | (.84) | - | (.84) | 12.27 | 7.06 | 97 | 1.13 | 1.10 | 6.74 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .82 | .35 | 1.17 | (.79) | - | (.79) | 12.26 | 10.05 | 58 | 1.15 | 1.14 | 6.76 | |||
Class R-4: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2008 | 12.35 | .93 | (2.32) | (1.39) | (.93) | (.02) | (.95) | 10.01 | (11.93) | 125 | .77 | .73 | 8.08 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2007 | 12.30 | .92 | .04 | .96 | (.91) | - | (.91) | 12.35 | 7.93 | 118 | .75 | .72 | 7.30 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2006 | 12.27 | .91 | .05 | .96 | (.93) | - | (.93) | 12.30 | 8.19 | 73 | .75 | .72 | 7.46 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .88 | .01 | .89 | (.88) | - | (.88) | 12.27 | 7.46 | 42 | .75 | .72 | 7.14 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .86 | .35 | 1.21 | (.83) | - | (.83) | 12.26 | 10.45 | 24 | .79 | .78 | 7.11 | |||
Class R-5: | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended 9/30/2008 | 12.35 | .96 | (2.32) | (1.36) | (.96) | (.02) | (.98) | 10.01 | (11.65) | 140 | .45 | .42 | 8.40 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2007 | 12.30 | .96 | .04 | 1.00 | (.95) | - | (.95) | 12.35 | 8.26 | 137 | .44 | .41 | 7.61 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2006 | 12.27 | .95 | .05 | 1.00 | (.97) | - | (.97) | 12.30 | 8.51 | 84 | .46 | .42 | 7.75 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2005 | 12.26 | .92 | .01 | .93 | (.92) | - | (.92) | 12.27 | 7.78 | 63 | .46 | .43 | 7.37 | |||
Year ended 9/30/2004 | 11.88 | .90 | .35 | 1.25 | (.87) | - | (.87) | 12.26 | 10.80 | 74 | .47 | .47 | 7.39 |
Year ended September 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate for all classes of shares | 35 | % | 42 | % | 41 | % | 39 | % | 39 | % |
(1) Based on operations for the periods shown (unless otherwise noted) and, accordingly, may not be representative of a full year. | ||||||||||||||
(2) Based on average shares outstanding. | ||||||||||||||
(3) Total returns exclude any applicable sales charges, including contingent deferred sales charges. | ||||||||||||||
(4) This column reflects the impact, if any, of certain reimbursements/waivers from CRMC. During the periods shown, CRMC reduced fees for investment advisory services. In addition, during some of the periods shown, CRMC paid a portion of the fund's transfer agent fees for certain retirement plan share classes. | ||||||||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of American High-Income Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the summary investment portfolio, of American High-Income Trust (the “Fund”), as of September 30, 2008, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of September 30, 2008, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of American High-Income Trust as of September 30, 2008, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Costa Mesa, California
November 10, 2008
Expense example
unaudited
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs such as initial sales charges on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions (loads); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund so you can compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (April 1, 2008, through September 30, 2008).
Actual expenses:
The first line of each share class in the table on the next page provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled "Expenses paid during period" to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes:
The second line of each share class in the table on the next page provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio for the share class and an assumed rate of return of 5.00% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of the share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5.00% hypothetical example with the 5.00% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Notes:
There are some account fees that are charged to certain types of accounts, such as individual retirement accounts and 529 college savings plan accounts (generally, a $10 fee is charged to set up the account and an additional $10 fee is charged to the account annually) that would increase the amount of expenses paid on your account. In addition, retirement plan participants may be subject to certain fees charged by the plan sponsor, and Class F-1, F-2 and 529-F-1 shareholders may be subject to fees charged by financial intermediaries, typically ranging from 0.75% to 1.50% of assets annually depending on services offered. You can estimate the impact of these fees by adding the amount of the fees to the total estimated expenses you paid on your account during the period as calculated above. In addition, your ending account value would also be lower by the amount of these fees.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line of each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning account value 4/1/2008 | Ending account value 9/30/2008 | Expenses paid during period* | Annualized expense ratio | |||||||||||||
Class A -- actual return | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 931.91 | $ | 3.28 | .68 | % | ||||||||
Class A -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,021.60 | 3.44 | .68 | ||||||||||||
Class B -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 928.38 | 6.94 | 1.44 | ||||||||||||
Class B -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,017.80 | 7.26 | 1.44 | ||||||||||||
Class C -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 928.15 | 7.13 | 1.48 | ||||||||||||
Class C -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,017.60 | 7.47 | 1.48 | ||||||||||||
Class F-1 -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 931.79 | 3.38 | .70 | ||||||||||||
Class F-1 -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,021.50 | 3.54 | .70 | ||||||||||||
Class F-2 -- actual return† | 1,000.00 | 921.56 | .73 | .49 | ||||||||||||
Class F-2 -- assumed 5% return† | 1,000.00 | 1,022.55 | 2.48 | .49 | ||||||||||||
Class 529-A -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 931.80 | 3.43 | .71 | ||||||||||||
Class 529-A -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,021.45 | 3.59 | .71 | ||||||||||||
Class 529-B -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 927.87 | 7.42 | 1.54 | ||||||||||||
Class 529-B -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,017.30 | 7.77 | 1.54 | ||||||||||||
Class 529-C -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 927.89 | 7.42 | 1.54 | ||||||||||||
Class 529-C -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,017.30 | 7.77 | 1.54 | ||||||||||||
Class 529-E -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 930.33 | 4.92 | 1.02 | ||||||||||||
Class 529-E -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,019.90 | 5.15 | 1.02 | ||||||||||||
Class 529-F-1 -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 932.64 | 2.51 | .52 | ||||||||||||
Class 529-F-1 -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,022.40 | 2.63 | .52 | ||||||||||||
Class R-1 -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 928.10 | 7.18 | 1.49 | ||||||||||||
Class R-1 -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,017.55 | 7.52 | 1.49 | ||||||||||||
Class R-2 -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 928.27 | 7.04 | 1.46 | ||||||||||||
Class R-2 -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,017.70 | 7.36 | 1.46 | ||||||||||||
Class R-3 -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 930.25 | 4.97 | 1.03 | ||||||||||||
Class R-3 -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,019.85 | 5.20 | 1.03 | ||||||||||||
Class R-4 -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 931.71 | 3.48 | .72 | ||||||||||||
Class R-4 -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,021.40 | 3.64 | .72 | ||||||||||||
Class R-5 -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 933.15 | 2.03 | .42 | ||||||||||||
Class R-5 -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,022.90 | 2.12 | .42 |
*The “expenses paid during period” are equal to the “annualized expense ratio,” multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, and divided by 366 (to reflect the one-half year period).
† The period for the "annualized expense ratio" and "actual return" line is based on the number of days from August 4, 2008 (the initial sale of the share class), through September 30, 2008, and accordingly, is not representative of a full period. The "assumed 5% return" line is based on 183 days.
Tax information
unaudited
We are required to advise you within 60 days of the fund’s fiscal year-end regarding the federal tax status of certain distributions received by shareholders during such fiscal year. The fund hereby designates the following amounts for the fund’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2008:
Long-term capital gains | $ | 25,932,000 | ||
Qualified dividend income | 15,699,000 | |||
Corporate dividends received deduction | 7,974,000 | |||
U.S. government income that may be exempt from state taxation | 4,323,000 |
Individual shareholders should refer to their Form 1099 or other tax information, which will be mailed in January 2009, to determine the calendar year amounts to be included on their 2008 tax returns. Shareholders should consult their tax advisers.
Approval of Investment Advisory and Service Agreement
The fund’s board has approved the fund’s Investment Advisory and Service Agreement (the “agreement”) with Capital Research and Management Company (“CRMC”) for an additional one-year term through October 31, 2009. The board approved the agreement following the recommendation of the fund’s Contracts Committee (the “committee”), which is composed of all of the fund’s independent board members. The board and the committee determined that the fund’s advisory fee structure was fair and reasonable in relation to the services provided and that approving the agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
In reaching this decision, the board and the committee took into account information furnished to them throughout the year, as well as information prepared specifically in connection with their review of the agreement and were advised by their independent counsel. They considered the factors discussed below, among others, but did not identify any single issue or particular piece of information that, in isolation, was the controlling factor.
1. Nature, extent and quality of services
The board and the committee considered the depth and quality of CRMC’s investment management process, including its global research capabilities; the experience, capability and integrity of its senior management and other personnel; the low turnover rates of its key personnel; the overall financial strength and stability of its organization; and the ongoing evolution of CRMC’s organizational structure designed to maintain and strengthen these qualities. The board and the committee also considered the nature, extent and quality of administrative, compliance and shareholder services provided by CRMC to the fund under the agreement and other agreements as well as the benefits to fund shareholders from investing in a fund that is part of a large family of funds. The board and the committee concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by CRMC have benefited and should continue to benefit the fund and its shareholders.
2. Investment results
The board and the committee considered the investment results of the fund in light of its primary objective of providing a high level of current income and its secondary objective of capital appreciation. They compared the fund’s total returns with those of other relevant funds (including the other funds that are the basis of the Lipper index for the category in which the fund is included) and market data such as relevant market indices. This report, including the letter to shareholders and related disclosures, contains certain information about the fund’s investment results. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s short- and long-term results have been satisfactory and that CRMC’s record in managing the fund indicated that its continued management should benefit the fund and its shareholders.
3. Advisory fees and total expenses
The board and the committee compared the advisory fees and total expense levels of the fund to those of other relevant funds. They observed that the fund’s advisory fees and expenses remain significantly below those of most other relevant funds. The board and the committee also noted the breakpoint discounts in the fund’s advisory fee structure that reduce the level of fees charged by CRMC to the fund as fund assets increase as well as the 10% advisory fee waiver in effect since April 2005. In addition, they reviewed information regarding the advisory fees paid by institutional clients of an affiliate of CRMC with investment mandates similar to those of the fund. They noted that, although the fees paid by those clients generally were lower than those paid by the fund, the differences appropriately reflected the significant investment, operational and regulatory differences between advising mutual funds and institutional clients. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s cost structure was fair and reasonable in relation to the services provided, and that the shareholders receive reasonable value in return for the advisory fees and other amounts paid to CRMC by the fund.
4. Ancillary benefits
The board and the committee considered a variety of other benefits received by CRMC and its affiliates as a result of CRMC’s relationship with the fund and the other American Funds, including fees for administrative services provided to certain share classes; fees paid to CRMC’s affiliated transfer agent; sales charges and distribution fees received and retained by the fund’s principal underwriter, an affiliate of CRMC; and possible ancillary benefits to CRMC’s institutional management affiliates. The board and the committee reviewed CRMC’s portfolio trading practices, noting that while CRMC receives the benefit of research provided by broker-dealers executing portfolio transactions on behalf of the fund, it does not obtain third-party research or other services in return for allocating brokerage to such broker-dealers. The board and the committee took these ancillary benefits into account in evaluating the reasonableness of the advisory fees and other amounts paid to CRMC by the fund.
5. Adviser financial information
The board and the committee reviewed information regarding CRMC’s costs of providing services to the American Funds, including personnel, systems and resources of investment, compliance, trading, accounting and other administrative operations. They considered CRMC’s costs and willingness to invest in technology, infrastructure and staff to maintain and expand services and capabilities, respond to industry and regulatory developments and attract and retain qualified personnel. They noted information previously received regarding the compensation structure for CRMC’s investment professionals. The board and the committee also compared CRMC’s profitability to the reported results of several large, publicly held investment management companies. The board and the committee noted the competitiveness and cyclicality of both the mutual fund industry and the capital markets, and the importance in that environment of CRMC’s long-term profitability for maintaining its independence, company culture and management continuity. They further considered the breakpoint discounts in the fund’s advisory fee structure and the impact of CRMC’s current 10% advisory fee waiver, reflecting benefits that may accrue from growth in assets. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s advisory fee structure reflected a reasonable sharing of benefits between CRMC and the fund’s shareholders.
Other share class results
unaudited
Fund results shown are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Classes B, C, F and 529 | ||||||||||||
Average annual total returns for periods ended September 30, 2008: | ||||||||||||
1 year | 5 years | Life of class | ||||||||||
Class B shares — first sold 3/15/00 | ||||||||||||
Reflecting applicable contingent deferred sales | ||||||||||||
charge (CDSC), maximum of 5%, payable only | ||||||||||||
if shares are sold within six years of purchase | –16.60 | % | 3.05 | % | 4.12 | % | ||||||
Not reflecting CDSC | –12.55 | 3.35 | 4.12 | |||||||||
Class C shares — first sold 3/15/01 | ||||||||||||
Reflecting CDSC, maximum of 1%, payable only | ||||||||||||
if shares are sold within one year of purchase | –13.40 | 3.29 | 4.43 | |||||||||
Not reflecting CDSC | –12.59 | 3.29 | 4.43 | |||||||||
Class F-1 shares1 — first sold 3/15/01 | ||||||||||||
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged | ||||||||||||
by sponsoring firm | –11.90 | 4.09 | 5.21 | |||||||||
Class F-2 shares1 — first sold 8/4/08 | ||||||||||||
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged | ||||||||||||
by sponsoring firm | — | — | –7.84 | 2 | ||||||||
Class 529-A shares3 — first sold 2/19/02 | ||||||||||||
Reflecting 3.75% maximum sales charge | –15.20 | 3.29 | 5.42 | |||||||||
Not reflecting maximum sales charge | –11.91 | 4.08 | 6.03 | |||||||||
Class 529-B shares3 — first sold 2/25/02 | ||||||||||||
Reflecting applicable CDSC, maximum of 5%, payable | ||||||||||||
only if shares are sold within six years of purchase | –16.69 | 2.90 | 5.33 | |||||||||
Not reflecting CDSC | –12.64 | 3.19 | 5.33 | |||||||||
Class 529-C shares3 — first sold 2/19/02 | ||||||||||||
Reflecting CDSC, maximum of 1%, payable only | ||||||||||||
if shares are sold within one year of purchase | –13.45 | 3.20 | 5.15 | |||||||||
Not reflecting CDSC | –12.64 | 3.20 | 5.15 | |||||||||
Class 529-E shares1,3 — first sold 3/15/02 | –12.18 | 3.74 | 5.38 | |||||||||
Class 529-F shares1,3 — first sold 9/16/02 | ||||||||||||
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged | ||||||||||||
by sponsoring firm | –11.74 | 4.18 | 8.18 | |||||||||
1 These shares are sold without any initial or contingent deferred sales charge. | ||||||||||||
2 Results are cumulative total returns; they are not annualized. | ||||||||||||
3 Results shown do not reflect the $10 initial account setup fee and an annual $10 account maintenance fee. |
The fund’s investment adviser waived 5% of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through March 31, 2005, and increased the waiver to 10% on April 1, 2005. Fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. Please see the Financial Highlights table on pages 24 and 25 for details.
For information regarding the differences among the various share classes, please refer to the fund’s prospectus.
Board of trustees and other officers
“Independent” trustees | ||
Year first | ||
elected | ||
a trustee | ||
Name and age | of the fund1 | Principal occupation(s) during past five years |
Ambassador | 1999 | Corporate director and author; former U.S. |
Richard G. Capen, Jr., 74 | Ambassador to Spain; former Vice Chairman, Knight-Ridder, Inc. (communications company); former Chairman and Publisher, The Miami Herald | |
H. Frederick Christie, 75 | 1987 | Private investor; former President and CEO, The Mission Group (non-utility holding company, subsidiary of Southern California Edison Company) |
James G. Ellis, 61 | 2006 | Dean and Professor of Marketing, University of Southern California |
Martin Fenton, 73 | 1989 | Chairman of the Board, Senior Resource Group LLC |
Chairman of the Board | (development and management of senior living | |
(Independent and | communities) | |
Non-Executive) | ||
Leonard R. Fuller, 62 | 1994 | President and CEO, Fuller Consulting (financial management consulting firm) |
R. Clark Hooper, 62 | 2005 | Private investor; former President, Dumbarton Group LLC (securities industry consulting); former Executive Vice President — Policy and Oversight, NASD |
Richard G. Newman, 74 | 1991 | Chairman of the Board, AECOM Technology Corporation (engineering, consulting and professional technical services) |
Frank M. Sanchez, 65 | 1999 | Principal, The Sanchez Family Corporation dba McDonald’s Restaurants (McDonald’s licensee) |
Steadman Upham, Ph.D., 59 | 2007 | President and Professor of Anthropology, The University of Tulsa; former President and Professor of Archaeology, Claremont Graduate University |
Independent” trustees | ||
Number of | ||
portfolios | ||
in fund | ||
complex2 | ||
overseen by | ||
Name and age | trustee | Other directorships3 held by trustee |
Ambassador | 15 | Carnival Corporation |
Richard G. Capen, Jr., 74 | ||
H. Frederick Christie, 75 | 21 | AECOM Technology Corporation; DineEquity, Inc.; Ducommun Incorporated; SouthWest Water Company |
James G. Ellis, 61 | 12 | None |
Martin Fenton, 73 | 18 | None |
Chairman of the Board | ||
(Independent and | ||
Non-Executive) | ||
Leonard R. Fuller, 62 | 16 | None |
R. Clark Hooper, 62 | 18 | JPMorgan Value Opportunities Fund, Inc.; The Swiss Helvetia Fund, Inc. |
Richard G. Newman, 74 | 14 | Sempra Energy; SouthWest Water Company |
Frank M. Sanchez, 65 | 13 | None |
Steadman Upham, Ph.D., 59 | 14 | None |
“Interested” trustees4 | ||
Year first | ||
elected a | ||
trustee or | Principal occupation(s) during past five years and | |
Name, age and | officer of | positions held with affiliated entities or the |
position with fund | the fund1 | principal underwriter of the fund |
Abner D. Goldstine, 78 | 1987 | Senior Vice President — Fixed Income, Capital |
Vice Chairman of the Board | Research and Management Company; Director, Capital Research and Management Company | |
Paul G. Haaga, Jr., 59 | 1987 | Vice Chairman of the Board, Capital Research and |
Vice Chairman of the Board | Management Company; Senior Vice President — Fixed Income, Capital Research and Management Company | |
David C. Barclay, 52 | 1995 | Senior Vice President — Fixed Income, Capital |
President | Research and Management Company; Director, The Capital Group Companies, Inc.5 | |
“Interested” trustees4 | ||
Number of | ||
portfolios | ||
in fund | ||
complex2 | ||
Name, age and | overseen by | |
position with fund | trustee | Other directorships3 held by trustee |
Abner D. Goldstine, 78 | 13 | None |
Vice Chairman of the Board | ||
Paul G. Haaga, Jr., 59 | 14 | None |
Vice Chairman of the Board | ||
David C. Barclay, 52 | 1 | None |
President |
The fund’s statement of additional information includes additional information about fund trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling American Funds Service Company at 800/421-0180. The address for all trustees and officers of the fund is 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071, Attention: Secretary.
1Trustees and officers of the fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement. |
2Capital Research and Management Company manages the American Funds, consisting of 31 funds. Capital Research and Management Company also manages American Funds Insurance Series,® which is composed of 16 funds and serves as the underlying investment vehicle for certain variable insurance contracts; American Funds Target Date Retirement Series,® Inc., which is composed of nine funds and is available through tax-deferred retirement plans and IRAs; and Endowments, which is composed of two portfolios and is available to certain nonprofit organizations. |
3This includes all directorships (other than those in the American Funds or other funds managed by Capital Research and Management Company) that are held by each trustee as a director of a public company or a registered investment company. |
4“Interested persons” within the meaning of the 1940 Act, on the basis of their affiliation with the fund’s investment adviser, Capital Research and Management Company, or affiliated entities (including the fund’s principal underwriter). |
5Company affiliated with Capital Research and Management Company. |
Other officers | ||
Year first | ||
elected | Principal occupation(s) during past five years | |
Name, age and | an officer | and positions held with affiliated entities or the |
position with fund | of the fund1 | principal underwriter of the fund |
Susan M. Tolson, 46 | 1997 | Senior Vice President — Fixed Income, Capital |
Senior Vice President | Research and Management Company | |
Jennifer L. Hinman, 50 | 2001 | Senior Vice President — Fixed Income, Capital |
Vice President | Research Company;5 Director, Capital Research Company;5 Director, Capital International Research, Inc.5 | |
Kristine M. Nishiyama, 38 | 2003 | Vice President and Senior Counsel — Fund Business |
Vice President | Management Group, Capital Research and Management Company; Vice President and Counsel, Capital Bank and Trust Company5 | |
Kimberly S. Verdick, 44 | 1994 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Secretary | Group, Capital Research and Management Company | |
Ari M. Vinocor, 34 | 2007 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Treasurer | Group, Capital Research and Management Company | |
Courtney R. Taylor, 33 | 2006 | Assistant Vice President — Fund Business |
Assistant Secretary | Management Group, Capital Research and Management Company | |
M. Susan Gupton, 35 | 2008 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Assistant Treasurer | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
Please see page 32 for footnotes.
Offices of the fund and of the
investment adviser
Capital Research and Management Company
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
6455 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA 92618
Principal underwriter
American Funds Distributors, Inc.
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
Transfer agent for shareholder accounts
American Funds Service Company
(Please write to the address near you.)
P.O. Box 6007
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6007
P.O. Box 2280
Norfolk, VA 23501-2280
Custodian of assets
JPMorgan Chase Bank
270 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017-2070
Counsel
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
515 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228
Independent registered public accounting firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
695 Town Center Drive
Suite 1200
Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7188
Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the American Funds. This and other important information is contained in the fund’s prospectus, which can be obtained from your financial professional and should be read carefully before investing. You may also call American Funds Service Company (AFS) at 800/421-0180 or visit the American Funds website at americanfunds.com.
“American Funds Proxy Voting Guidelines” — which describes how we vote proxies relating to portfolio securities — is available free of charge on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) website at sec.gov, on the American Funds website or upon request by calling AFS. The fund files its proxy voting record with the SEC for the 12 months ended June 30 by August 31. The report also is available on the SEC and American Funds websites.
A complete September 30, 2008, portfolio of American High-Income Trust’s investments is available free of charge by calling AFS or visiting the SEC website (where it is part of Form N-CSR).
American High-Income Trust files a complete list of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. This filing is available free of charge on the SEC website. You may also review or, for a fee, copy this filing at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. (800/SEC-0330). Additionally, the list of portfolio holdings also is available by calling AFS.
This report is for the information of shareholders of American High-Income Trust, but it also may be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus, which gives details about charges, expenses, investment objectives and operating policies of the fund. If used as sales material after December 31, 2008, this report must be accompanied by an American Funds statistical update for the most recently completed calendar quarter.
[logo - American Funds®]
The right choice for the long term®
What makes American Funds different?
For more than 75 years, we have followed a consistent philosophy to benefit our investors. Our 31 carefully conceived, broadly diversified funds, in addition to the target date retirement series, offer opportunities that have attracted over 50 million shareholder accounts.
Our unique combination of strengths includes these five factors:
• | A long-term, value-oriented approach |
We seek to buy securities at reasonable prices relative to their prospects and hold them for the long term. |
• | An extensive global research effort |
Our investment professionals travel the world to find the best investment opportunities and gain a comprehensive understanding of companies and markets. |
• | The multiple portfolio counselor system |
Our unique method of portfolio management, developed 50 years ago, blends teamwork with individual accountability and has provided American Funds with a sustainable method of achieving fund objectives. |
• | Experienced investment professionals |
American Funds portfolio counselors have an average of 26 years of investment experience, providing a wealth of knowledge and experience that few organizations have. |
• | A commitment to low operating expenses |
The American Funds provide exceptional value for shareholders, with operating expenses that are among the lowest in the mutual fund industry. |
American Funds span a range of investment objectives
• | Growth funds |
Emphasis on long-term growth through stocks |
AMCAP Fund® |
EuroPacific Growth Fund® |
The Growth Fund of America® |
The New Economy Fund® |
New Perspective Fund® |
New World FundSM |
SMALLCAP World Fund® |
• | Growth-and-income funds |
Emphasis on long-term growth and dividends through stocks |
American Mutual Fund® |
Capital World Growth and Income FundSM |
Fundamental InvestorsSM |
International Growth and Income FundSM |
The Investment Company of America® |
Washington Mutual Investors FundSM |
• | Equity-income funds |
Emphasis on above-average income and growth through stocks and/or bonds |
Capital Income Builder® |
The Income Fund of America® |
• | Balanced fund |
Emphasis on long-term growth and current income through stocks and bonds |
American Balanced Fund® |
• | Bond funds |
Emphasis on current income through bonds |
> | American High-Income TrustSM |
The Bond Fund of AmericaSM |
Capital World Bond Fund® |
Intermediate Bond Fund of America® |
Short-Term Bond Fund of AmericaSM |
U.S. Government Securities FundSM |
• | Tax-exempt bond funds |
Emphasis on tax-free current income through municipal bonds |
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund® |
Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of AmericaSM |
The Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America® |
State-specific tax-exempt funds |
The Tax-Exempt Fund of California® |
The Tax-Exempt Fund of Maryland® |
The Tax-Exempt Fund of Virginia® |
• | Money market funds |
The Cash Management Trust of America® |
The Tax-Exempt Money Fund of AmericaSM |
The U.S. Treasury Money Fund of AmericaSM |
• | American Funds Target Date Retirement Series® |
The Capital Group Companies
American Funds Capital Research and Management Capital International Capital Guardian Capital Bank and Trust
Lit. No. MFGEAR-921-1108P
Litho in USA RCG/CG/8049-S16813
Printed on paper containing 10% post-consumer waste
Printed with inks containing soy and/or vegetable oil
ITEM 2 – Code of Ethics
The Registrant has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. The Registrant undertakes to provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of the Code of Ethics. Such request can be made to American Funds Service Company at 800/421-0180 or to the Secretary of the Registrant, 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California 90071.
ITEM 3 – Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Registrant’s board has determined that H. Frederick Christie, a member of the Registrant’s audit committee, is an “audit committee financial expert” and "independent," as such terms are defined in this Item. This designation will not increase the designee’s duties, obligations or liability as compared to his or her duties, obligations and liability as a member of the audit committee and of the board, nor will it reduce the responsibility of the other audit committee members. There may be other individuals who, through education or experience, would qualify as "audit committee financial experts" if the board had designated them as such. Most importantly, the board believes each member of the audit committee contributes significantly to the effective oversight of the Registrant’s financial statements and condition.
ITEM 4 – Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Registrant: | ||||
a) Audit Fees: | ||||
2007 | $94,000 | |||
2008 | $109,000 | |||
b) Audit-Related Fees: | ||||
2007 | $6,000 | |||
2008 | $9,000 | |||
The audit-related fees consist of assurance and related services relating to the examination of the Registrant’s investment adviser conducted in accordance with Statement on Auditing Standards Number 70 issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. | ||||
c) Tax Fees: | ||||
2007 | $6,000 | |||
2008 | $7,000 | |||
The tax fees consist of professional services relating to the preparation of the Registrant’s tax returns. | ||||
d) All Other Fees: | ||||
2007 | None | |||
2008 | None | |||
Adviser and affiliates (includes only fees for non-audit services billed to the adviser and affiliates for engagements that relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant and were subject to the pre-approval policies described below): | ||||
a) Not Applicable | ||||
b) Audit-Related Fees: | ||||
2007 | $956,000 | |||
2008 | $1,047,000 | |||
The audit–related fees consist of assurance and related services relating to the examination of the Registrant’s transfer agent, principal underwriter and investment adviser conducted in accordance with Statement on Auditing Standards Number 70 issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. | ||||
c) Tax Fees: | ||||
2007 | $2,000 | |||
2008 | $8,000 | |||
The tax fees consist of consulting services relating to the registrant’s investments. | ||||
d) All Other Fees: | ||||
2007 | None | |||
2008 | None | |||
The Registrant’s audit committee will pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services that the committee considers compatible with maintaining the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. The pre-approval requirement will extend to all non-audit services provided to the Registrant, the investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant. The committee will not delegate its responsibility to pre-approve these services to the investment adviser. The committee may delegate to one or more committee members the authority to review and pre-approve audit and permissible non-audit services. Actions taken under any such delegation will be reported to the full committee at its next meeting. The pre-approval requirement is waived with respect to non-audit services if certain conditions are met. The pre-approval requirement was not waived for any of the non-audit services listed above provided to the Registrant, adviser, and affiliates.
Aggregate non-audit fees paid to the Registrant’s auditors, including fees for all services billed to the Registrant and the adviser and affiliates that provide ongoing services to the Registrant were $1,238,000 for fiscal year 2007 and $1,366,000 for fiscal year 2008. The non-audit services represented by these amounts were brought to the attention of the committee and considered to be compatible with maintaining the auditors’ independence.
ITEM 5 – Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable to this Registrant, insofar as the Registrant is not a listed issuer as defined in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
ITEM 6 – Schedule of Investments
[logo – American Funds®]
American High-Income TrustSM
Investment portfolio
September 30, 2008
Bonds, notes & other debt instruments — 84.57% | Principal amount (000) | Value (000) | ||||||
CORPORATE BONDS, NOTES & LOANS — 79.50% | ||||||||
CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY — 21.60% | ||||||||
CCH II, LLC and CCH II Capital Corp. 10.25% 2010 | $ | 62,980 | $ | 56,997 | ||||
Charter Communications Holdings, LLC and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corp. 11.75% 2011 | 6,000 | 3,510 | ||||||
Charter Communications Holdings, LLC and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corp. 13.50% 2011 | 5,525 | 4,033 | ||||||
Charter Communications Operating, LLC and Charter Communications Operating Capital Corp. 8.00% 20121 | 50,950 | 45,855 | ||||||
Charter Communications Holdings, LLC and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corp. 12.125% 2012 | 2,850 | 1,731 | ||||||
CCO Holdings, LLC and CCO Holdings Capital Corp. 8.75% 2013 | 43,890 | 38,404 | ||||||
Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Term Loan B, 4.80% 20142,3,4 | 44,811 | 35,855 | ||||||
Charter Communications Operating, LLC and Charter Communications Operating Capital Corp. 8.375% 20141 | 28,700 | 25,471 | ||||||
Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Term Loan B, 8.77% 20142,3,4 | 26,616 | 25,339 | ||||||
Charter Communications Operating, LLC and Charter Communications Operating Capital Corp. 10.875% 20141 | 26,500 | 25,837 | ||||||
CCH I, LLC and CCH I Capital Corp. 11.00% 2015 | 78,275 | 52,053 | ||||||
Univision Communications, Inc., Second Lien Term Loan B, 6.50% 20092,3,4 | 11,494 | 10,977 | ||||||
Univision Communications Inc. 7.85% 2011 | 44,456 | 34,898 | ||||||
Univision Communications, Inc., First Lien Term Loan B, 5.049% 20142,3,4 | 65,195 | 42,051 | ||||||
Univision Communications Inc. 9.75% 20151,5 | 160,720 | 75,538 | ||||||
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc., Term Loan B, 5.22% 20142,3,4 | 9,523 | 7,960 | ||||||
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. 11.00% 20151 | 50,450 | 44,144 | ||||||
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. 11.25% 20151,5 | 74,975 | 61,854 | ||||||
Michaels Stores, Inc., Term Loan B, 4.75% 20132,3,4 | 28,994 | 21,419 | ||||||
Michaels Stores, Inc. 10.00% 2014 | 101,525 | 64,468 | ||||||
Michaels Stores, Inc. 0%/13.00% 20166 | 6,150 | 1,876 | ||||||
Michaels Stores, Inc. 11.375% 2016 | 9,250 | 4,417 | ||||||
TL Acquisitions, Inc., Term Loan B, 6.20% 20142,3,4 | 38,796 | 31,778 | ||||||
Thomson Learning 0%/13.25% 20151,6 | 16,045 | 10,830 | ||||||
Thomson Learning 10.50% 20151 | 56,890 | 45,228 | ||||||
CanWest Media Inc., Series B, 8.00% 2012 | 91,198 | 76,606 | ||||||
CanWest MediaWorks Inc. 9.25% 20151 | 3,700 | 2,682 | ||||||
Toys “R” Us, Inc. 7.625% 2011 | 62,330 | 52,357 | ||||||
Toys “R” Us-Delaware, Inc., Term Loan B, 7.059% 20122,3,4 | 24,013 | 21,689 | ||||||
MGM MIRAGE 6.00% 2009 | 18,500 | 17,390 | ||||||
MGM MIRAGE 8.50% 2010 | 3,100 | 2,868 | ||||||
Mandalay Resort Group 6.375% 2011 | 1,500 | 1,238 | ||||||
MGM MIRAGE 6.75% 2012 | 1,700 | 1,339 | ||||||
MGM MIRAGE 6.75% 2013 | 16,855 | 13,231 | ||||||
MGM MIRAGE 5.875% 2014 | 33,425 | 24,317 | ||||||
MGM MIRAGE 6.625% 2015 | 7,975 | 5,583 | ||||||
MGM MIRAGE 7.50% 2016 | 4,000 | 2,940 | ||||||
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority 6.375% 2009 | 36,500 | 34,857 | ||||||
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority 8.00% 2012 | 10,275 | 8,785 | ||||||
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority 6.125% 2013 | 1,225 | 1,023 | ||||||
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority 7.125% 2014 | 22,100 | 15,801 | ||||||
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority 6.875% 2015 | 3,775 | 2,624 | ||||||
Gray Television Inc., Series D, 12.00%/15.00% (undated)6,7,8 | 64,500 | 56,438 | ||||||
American Media Operations, Inc., Series B, 10.25% 2009 | 56,620 | 40,059 | ||||||
American Media Operations, Inc., Series B, 10.25% 20091 | 2,015 | 1,426 | ||||||
American Media Operations, Inc. 8.875% 2011 | 17,615 | 12,242 | ||||||
American Media Operations, Inc. 8.875% 20111 | 641 | 445 | ||||||
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 6.00% 2010 | 2,500 | 2,250 | ||||||
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 8.875% 2012 | 12,815 | 8,202 | ||||||
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 7.75% 2013 | 14,325 | 8,165 | ||||||
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 6.375% 2014 | 2,450 | 1,433 | ||||||
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 6.50% 2014 | 3,775 | 2,246 | ||||||
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 6.25% 2015 | 6,790 | 3,904 | ||||||
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 6.25% 2016 | 10,270 | 5,957 | ||||||
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 7.50% 2016 | 10,735 | 6,280 | ||||||
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. 8.625% 2017 | 19,860 | 12,214 | ||||||
Boyd Gaming Corp. 7.75% 2012 | 27,925 | 24,714 | ||||||
Boyd Gaming Corp. 6.75% 2014 | 30,300 | 21,892 | ||||||
Boyd Gaming Corp. 7.125% 2016 | 5,500 | 3,836 | ||||||
Quebecor Media Inc. 7.75% 2016 | 33,400 | 29,392 | ||||||
Quebecor Media Inc. 7.75% 2016 | 22,370 | 19,686 | ||||||
NTL Cable PLC 8.75% 2014 | 43,400 | 36,673 | ||||||
NTL Cable PLC 8.75% 2014 | € | 4,500 | 4,890 | |||||
NTL Cable PLC 9.75% 2014 | £ | 3,000 | 4,123 | |||||
Dollar General Corp., Term Loan B2, 6.454% 20142,3,4 | $ | 5,000 | 4,361 | |||||
Dollar General Corp. 10.625% 2015 | 19,725 | 19,528 | ||||||
Dollar General Corp. 11.875% 20172,5 | 20,700 | 19,251 | ||||||
General Motors Corp. 7.20% 2011 | 26,680 | 15,741 | ||||||
General Motors Corp. 7.125% 2013 | 16,055 | 7,425 | ||||||
General Motors Corp. 7.25% 2013 | € | 3,000 | 1,751 | |||||
General Motors Corp. 7.70% 2016 | $ | 3,950 | 1,590 | |||||
General Motors Corp. 8.80% 2021 | 30,520 | 11,750 | ||||||
General Motors Corp. 9.40% 20218 | 5,775 | 2,483 | ||||||
General Motors Corp. 8.25% 2023 | 3,650 | 1,451 | ||||||
AMC Entertainment Inc., Series B, 8.625% 2012 | 24,450 | 24,328 | ||||||
AMC Entertainment Inc. 8.00% 2014 | 8,175 | 7,071 | ||||||
AMC Entertainment Inc., Series B, 11.00% 2016 | 10,000 | 9,900 | ||||||
Ford Capital BV 9.50% 20108 | 4,000 | 2,740 | ||||||
Ford Motor Co. 9.50% 20118 | 1,000 | 620 | ||||||
Ford Motor Co., Term Loan B, 5.49% 20132,3,4 | 25,400 | 16,955 | ||||||
FCE Bank PLC 7.125% 20138 | € | 11,550 | 11,049 | |||||
Ford Motor Co. 6.50% 2018 | $ | 18,608 | 7,722 | |||||
Ford Motor Co. 8.875% 2022 | 2,220 | 1,021 | ||||||
Ford Motor Co. 7.45% 2031 | 2,500 | 1,087 | ||||||
Tenneco Automotive Inc., Series B, 10.25% 2013 | 5,144 | 5,311 | ||||||
Tenneco Automotive Inc. 8.625% 2014 | 38,250 | 30,600 | ||||||
Tenneco Inc. 8.125% 2015 | 5,000 | 4,300 | ||||||
Wynn Las Vegas, LLC and Wynn Las Vegas Capital Corp. 6.625% 2014 | 41,425 | 35,522 | ||||||
Hanesbrands Inc., Series B, 6.508% 20142 | 40,550 | 33,859 | ||||||
Kabel Deutschland GmbH 10.625% 2014 | 34,275 | 33,761 | ||||||
Cinemark USA, Inc., Term Loan B, 4.56% 20132,3,4 | 5,635 | 4,955 | ||||||
Cinemark, Inc. 0%/9.75% 20146 | 29,075 | 28,094 | ||||||
Radio One, Inc., Series B, 8.875% 2011 | 23,017 | 18,931 | ||||||
Radio One, Inc. 6.375% 20138 | 20,260 | 13,473 | ||||||
Gaylord Entertainment Co. 8.00% 2013 | 22,450 | 19,644 | ||||||
Gaylord Entertainment Co. 6.75% 2014 | 14,450 | 12,210 | ||||||
William Lyon Homes, Inc. 7.625% 2012 | 18,050 | 7,130 | ||||||
William Lyon Homes, Inc. 10.75% 2013 | 20,395 | 8,872 | ||||||
William Lyon Homes, Inc. 7.50% 2014 | 37,860 | 14,955 | ||||||
Technical Olympic USA, Inc. 9.00% 20109 | 22,486 | 10,006 | ||||||
Technical Olympic USA, Inc. 9.00% 20109 | 7,325 | 3,260 | ||||||
Technical Olympic USA, Inc. 9.25% 20111,9 | 36,325 | 16,165 | ||||||
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. 7.50% 2015 | 39,450 | 29,390 | ||||||
CSC Holdings, Inc., Series B, 8.125% 2009 | 12,975 | 12,878 | ||||||
Cablevision Systems Corp., Series B, 8.00% 2012 | 14,865 | 14,047 | ||||||
iesy Repository GmbH 10.125% 2015 | € | 4,750 | 6,114 | |||||
iesy Repository GmbH 10.375% 20151 | $ | 20,475 | 19,554 | |||||
Sally Holdings LLC and Sally Capital Inc. 9.25% 2014 | 26,525 | 25,132 | ||||||
Seneca Gaming Corp., Series B, 7.25% 2012 | 19,825 | 17,347 | ||||||
Seneca Gaming Corp. 7.25% 2012 | 8,440 | 7,385 | ||||||
Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Resort Casino 10.125% 2012 | 28,180 | 24,094 | ||||||
Fox Acquisition LLC 13.375% 20161,8 | 26,095 | 23,225 | ||||||
Meritage Corp. 7.00% 2014 | 8,575 | 6,646 | ||||||
Meritage Homes Corp. 6.25% 2015 | 10,575 | 7,878 | ||||||
Meritage Corp. 7.731% 20171,8 | 12,500 | 7,142 | ||||||
Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC and Atlantic Broadband Finance, Inc. 9.375% 2014 | 23,950 | 21,315 | ||||||
Sealy Mattress Co. 8.25% 2014 | 26,670 | 21,069 | ||||||
Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc. 7.00% 2012 | 18,025 | 14,600 | ||||||
Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc. 8.375% 2014 | 9,275 | 5,890 | ||||||
Education Management LLC and Education Management Finance Corp. 8.75% 2014 | 4,125 | 3,465 | ||||||
Education Management LLC and Education Management Finance Corp. 10.25% 2016 | 21,020 | 16,921 | ||||||
LBI Media, Inc. 8.50% 20171 | 30,380 | 20,203 | ||||||
Edcon Pty Ltd. 8.208% 20142 | € | 22,425 | 18,928 | |||||
Dillard’s, Inc. 6.625% 2008 | $ | 5,050 | 5,063 | |||||
Dillard Department Stores, Inc. 9.125% 2011 | 8,230 | 7,942 | ||||||
Dillard Department Stores, Inc. 7.85% 2012 | 1,900 | 1,681 | ||||||
Dillard’s, Inc. 7.13% 2018 | 4,000 | 2,560 | ||||||
Dillard’s, Inc. 7.00% 2028 | 3,000 | 1,545 | ||||||
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. 8.625% 2011 | 9,600 | 7,824 | ||||||
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. 8.125% 2016 | 16,725 | 10,704 | ||||||
J.C. Penney Co., Inc. 8.00% 2010 | 14,995 | 15,301 | ||||||
J.C. Penney Co., Inc. 9.00% 2012 | 2,980 | 3,155 | ||||||
DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC, First Lien Term Loan, 6.82% 20122,3,4 | 25,550 | 17,455 | ||||||
Local T.V. Finance LLC 9.25% 20151,5 | 25,560 | 16,742 | ||||||
Bon-Ton Department Stores, Inc. 10.25% 2014 | 50,375 | 15,364 | ||||||
Standard Pacific Corp. 5.125% 2009 | 3,750 | 3,600 | ||||||
Standard Pacific Corp. 6.875% 2011 | 1,905 | 1,629 | ||||||
Standard Pacific Corp. 7.75% 2013 | 3,920 | 3,214 | ||||||
Standard Pacific Corp. 6.25% 2014 | 5,685 | 4,321 | ||||||
Standard Pacific Corp. 7.00% 2015 | 2,715 | 2,063 | ||||||
Warner Music Group 7.375% 2014 | 19,610 | 14,658 | ||||||
Liberty Media Corp. 7.75% 2009 | 4,750 | 4,783 | ||||||
Liberty Media Corp. 8.25% 2030 | 12,675 | 8,616 | ||||||
Regal Cinemas Corp., Series B, 9.375% 20128 | 13,300 | 13,026 | ||||||
Claire’s Stores, Inc., Term Loan B, 5.56% 20142,3,4 | 9,603 | 5,831 | ||||||
Claire’s Stores, Inc. 9.25% 2015 | 14,450 | 6,069 | ||||||
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. 9.00% 20155 | 13,330 | 11,231 | ||||||
Dex Media, Inc., Series B, 0%/9.00% 20136 | 9,000 | 4,185 | ||||||
R.H. Donnelley Corp., Series A-1, 6.875% 2013 | 2,425 | 958 | ||||||
Dex Media, Inc., Series B, 8.00% 2013 | 3,075 | 1,430 | ||||||
R.H. Donnelley Corp., Series A-3, 8.875% 2016 | 12,750 | 4,399 | ||||||
KB Home 5.875% 2015 | 4,185 | 3,348 | ||||||
KB Home 6.25% 2015 | 9,285 | 7,614 | ||||||
Morris Publishing Group, LLC and Morris Publishing Finance Co., Series B, 7.00% 2013 | 41,358 | 10,133 | ||||||
Seminole Tribe of Florida 7.804% 20201,3 | 10,050 | 10,053 | ||||||
Delphi Automotive Systems Corp. 6.55% 20069 | 12,730 | 1,591 | ||||||
Delphi Automotive Systems Corp. 6.50% 20099 | 34,600 | 4,325 | ||||||
Delphi Corp. 6.50% 20139 | 17,190 | 2,235 | ||||||
Delphi Automotive Systems Corp. 7.125% 20299 | 14,300 | 1,787 | ||||||
Delphi Trust I 8.25% 20339 | 4,470 | 34 | ||||||
Vidéotron Ltée 6.875% 2014 | 6,780 | 6,441 | ||||||
Vidéotron Ltée 6.375% 2015 | 3,720 | 3,292 | ||||||
Young Broadcasting Inc. 10.00% 2011 | 58,845 | 8,827 | ||||||
Young Broadcasting Inc. 8.75% 2014 | 4,040 | 606 | ||||||
Visteon Corp. 8.25% 2010 | 3,772 | 3,150 | ||||||
Visteon Corp. 12.25% 20161 | 9,737 | 5,891 | ||||||
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp. 11.125% 20148 | 14,025 | 8,205 | ||||||
Mediacom Broadband LLC and Mediacom Broadband Corp. 8.50% 2015 | 8,375 | 6,951 | ||||||
WDAC Intermediate Corp. 8.375% 20141 | 9,870 | 5,478 | ||||||
WDAC Intermediate Corp. 8.50% 2014 | € | 1,750 | 1,299 | |||||
Idearc Inc. 8.00% 2016 | $ | 24,375 | 6,764 | |||||
DIRECTV Holdings LLC and DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. 8.375% 2013 | 6,031 | 5,986 | ||||||
D.R. Horton, Inc. 8.00% 2009 | 5,770 | 5,705 | ||||||
Federated Retail Holdings, Inc. 6.375% 2037 | 6,845 | 4,971 | ||||||
Viacom Inc. 5.75% 2011 | 4,500 | 4,374 | ||||||
TRW Automotive Inc. 7.00% 20141 | 4,650 | 3,859 | ||||||
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. 8.00% 2010 | 3,200 | 3,168 | ||||||
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 6.678% 20092 | 3,000 | 2,955 | ||||||
News America Inc. 6.75% 2038 | 2,990 | 2,919 | ||||||
Dollarama Group LP and Dollarama Corp. 8.875% 2012 | 2,675 | 2,287 | ||||||
Wyndham Worldwide Corp. 6.00% 2016 | 2,415 | 2,064 | ||||||
Carmike Cinemas, Inc., Delayed Draw, Term Loan, 6.47% 20122,3,4 | 1,750 | 1,584 | ||||||
KAC Acquisition Corp. 8.00% 20261,5,8 | 219 | 219 | ||||||
2,489,879 | ||||||||
INDUSTRIALS — 10.04% | ||||||||
Nielsen Finance LLC, Term Loan B, 4.803% 20132,3,4 | 9,701 | 8,606 | ||||||
Nielsen Finance LLC and Nielsen Finance Co. 10.00% 2014 | 92,625 | 88,457 | ||||||
Nielsen Finance LLC and Nielsen Finance Co. 0%/12.50% 20166 | 113,700 | 74,474 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc. 8.75% 2011 | 21,200 | 15,264 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2000-2, Class A-2, 7.487% 20123 | 5,000 | 4,800 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2000-2, Class C, 8.312% 20123 | 3,291 | 2,945 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2001-1, Class B, 7.373% 20173 | 5,526 | 4,559 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 1998-1, Class B, 6.748% 20183 | 8,918 | 7,134 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 1997-4B, Class B, 6.90% 20183 | 11,057 | 9,205 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 1997-4, Class A, 6.90% 20193 | 5,163 | 4,543 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2000-2, Class B, 8.307% 20193 | 2,943 | 2,348 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 1999-1, Class A, 6.545% 20203 | 9,145 | 7,773 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2003-ERJ3, Class A, 7.875% 20203 | 13,317 | 8,656 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2001-1, Class A-1, 6.703% 20223 | 3,171 | 2,664 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2000-2, Class A-1, 7.707% 20223 | 2,780 | 2,448 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2000-1, Class A-1, 8.048% 20223 | 369 | 349 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., Series 2000-1, Class B, 8.388% 20223 | 10,907 | 8,620 | ||||||
DAE Aviation Holdings, Inc. and Standard Aero Ltd., Term Loan B2, 6.55% 20142,3,4 | 10,366 | 9,588 | ||||||
DAE Aviation Holdings, Inc. and Standard Aero Ltd., Term Loan B1, 7.47% 20142,3,4 | 10,488 | 9,702 | ||||||
DAE Aviation Holdings, Inc. 11.25% 20151,8 | 66,070 | 59,463 | ||||||
United Air Lines, 1991 Equipment Trust Certificates, Series A, 10.11% 20063,8,9 | 1,136 | — | ||||||
United Air Lines, Inc., Series 2000-2, Class B, 7.811% 20113,9 | 17,433 | 20,135 | ||||||
United Air Lines, Inc., Series 2000-2, Class A-2, 7.186% 20123 | 4,082 | 4,122 | ||||||
United Air Lines, Inc., Term Loan B, 5.75% 20142,3,4 | 45,624 | 28,544 | ||||||
United Air Lines, Inc., Series 2001-1, Class A-1, 6.071% 20143 | 1,887 | 1,776 | ||||||
United Air Lines, Inc., Series 2001-1, Class A-3, 6.602% 20153 | 1,590 | 1,575 | ||||||
United Air Lines, Inc., Series 2007-1, Class B, 7.336% 20211,3 | 8,966 | 6,231 | ||||||
AMR Corp., Series B, 10.45% 2011 | 1,850 | 1,216 | ||||||
American Airlines, Inc., Series 2001-1, Class A-2, 6.817% 20123 | 17,375 | 14,248 | ||||||
American Airlines, Inc., Series 2001-2, Class B, 8.608% 20123 | 8,690 | 7,604 | ||||||
AMR Corp. 9.00% 2012 | 16,155 | 10,582 | ||||||
American Airlines, Inc., Series 2001-2, Class A-2, 7.858% 20133 | 1,300 | 1,197 | ||||||
AMR Corp. 9.00% 2016 | 1,475 | 907 | ||||||
American Airlines, Inc., Series 2001-1, Class B, 7.377% 20193 | 20,457 | 10,024 | ||||||
AMR Corp. 9.88% 20208 | 1,275 | 797 | ||||||
AMR Corp. 9.80% 20218 | 2,555 | 1,597 | ||||||
AMR Corp. 10.00% 20218 | 9,000 | 5,625 | ||||||
Ashtead Group PLC 8.625% 20151 | 17,750 | 15,354 | ||||||
Ashtead Capital, Inc. 9.00% 20161 | 43,270 | 37,429 | ||||||
ARAMARK Corp., Term Loan B, 5.637% 20142,3,4 | 15,587 | 13,666 | ||||||
ARAMARK Corp., Term Loan B, Letter of Credit, 5.637% 20142,3,4 | 990 | 868 | ||||||
ARAMARK Corp. 6.301% 20152 | 12,520 | 11,018 | ||||||
ARAMARK Corp. 8.50% 2015 | 28,745 | 27,164 | ||||||
DynCorp International and DIV Capital Corp., Series B, 9.50% 2013 | 29,367 | 28,780 | ||||||
DynCorp International and DIV Capital Corp. 9.50% 20131 | 23,310 | 23,193 | ||||||
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Co., LLC 8.50% 2015 | 4,975 | 4,577 | ||||||
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Co., LLC 8.875% 20155 | 48,710 | 44,326 | ||||||
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Co., LLC 9.75% 2017 | 2,880 | 2,592 | ||||||
US Investigations Services, Inc., Term Loan B, 5.954% 20152,3,4 | 10,648 | 9,210 | ||||||
US Investigations Services, Inc. 10.50% 20151 | 34,825 | 31,168 | ||||||
US Investigations Services, Inc. 11.75% 20161,8 | 12,875 | 10,300 | ||||||
DRS Technologies, Inc. 6.875% 2013 | 21,630 | 21,522 | ||||||
DRS Technologies, Inc. 6.625% 2016 | 5,400 | 5,481 | ||||||
DRS Technologies, Inc. 7.625% 2018 | 18,175 | 19,084 | ||||||
NTK Holdings Inc. 0%/10.75% 20143,6 | 53,460 | 23,255 | ||||||
THL Buildco, Inc. 8.50% 2014 | 34,620 | 19,907 | ||||||
Allied Waste North America, Inc., Series B, 6.50% 2010 | 9,500 | 9,334 | ||||||
Allied Waste North America, Inc., Series B, 5.75% 2011 | 8,450 | 8,133 | ||||||
Allied Waste North America, Inc., Series B, 6.125% 2014 | 5,350 | 4,949 | ||||||
Allied Waste North America, Inc., Series B, 7.375% 2014 | 15,705 | 15,352 | ||||||
Allied Waste North America, Inc. 6.875% 2017 | 2,800 | 2,618 | ||||||
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. 9.50% 2014 | 35,900 | 33,208 | ||||||
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Series 2000-1, Class A-1, 7.379% 20113 | 1,120 | 1,089 | ||||||
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Series 2000-1, Class A-2, 7.57% 20123 | 17,018 | 15,401 | ||||||
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Series 2000-1, Class B, 7.92% 20123 | 3,500 | 3,028 | ||||||
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Second Lien Term Loan B, 6.954% 20142,3,4 | 11,850 | 8,422 | ||||||
CEVA Group PLC 10.00% 20141 | 9,675 | 9,336 | ||||||
CEVA Group PLC, Bridge Loan, 7.736% 20152,3,4,8 | 26,763 | 16,593 | ||||||
Northwest Airlines, Inc., Term Loan B, 7.27% 20132,3,4,8 | 14,386 | 13,558 | ||||||
Northwest Airlines, Inc., Term Loan A, 5.52% 20182,3,4,8 | 11,489 | 10,368 | ||||||
Atrium Companies, Inc., Term Loan B, 6.54% 20122,3,4 | 24,079 | 17,698 | ||||||
ACIH, Inc. 11.50% 20121,9 | 37,235 | 4,654 | ||||||
RBS Global, Inc. and Rexnord LLC 9.50% 2014 | 11,675 | 11,033 | ||||||
RBS Global, Inc. and Rexnord LLC 8.875% 2016 | 8,475 | 7,755 | ||||||
TFM, SA de CV 9.375% 2012 | 17,775 | 18,219 | ||||||
Accuride Corp. 8.50% 2015 | 26,755 | 17,123 | ||||||
B/E Aerospace 8.50% 2018 | 16,105 | 15,662 | ||||||
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 7.50% 2009 | 10,067 | 10,117 | ||||||
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 8.00% 2015 | 3,400 | 3,366 | ||||||
RSC Holdings III, LLC, Second Lien Term Loan B, 6.30% 20132,3,4 | 16,541 | 13,037 | ||||||
United Rentals (North America), Inc., Series B, 6.50% 2012 | 10,675 | 8,967 | ||||||
United Rentals (North America), Inc. 7.75% 2013 | 3,625 | 2,764 | ||||||
TransDigm Inc. 7.75% 2014 | 11,960 | 11,302 | ||||||
Mobile Services Group, Inc. 9.75% 2014 | 10,000 | 9,350 | ||||||
H&E Equipment Services, Inc. 8.375% 2016 | 11,875 | 8,847 | ||||||
Esterline Technologies Corp. 6.625% 2017 | 8,250 | 7,879 | ||||||
Quebecor World Inc. 8.75% 20161,9 | 17,615 | 7,134 | ||||||
Sequa Corp., Term Loan B, 6.96% 20142,3,4 | 7,365 | 6,617 | ||||||
Alion Science and Technology Corp. 10.25% 2015 | 10,350 | 6,572 | ||||||
Esco Corp. 6.694% 20131,2 | 950 | 879 | ||||||
Esco Corp. 8.625% 20131 | 5,600 | 5,516 | ||||||
Hertz Corp. 8.875% 2014 | 3,175 | 2,754 | ||||||
Hertz Corp. 10.50% 2016 | 4,250 | 3,570 | ||||||
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. 8.375% 2014 | 6,225 | 4,964 | ||||||
RSC Equipment Rental, Inc. and RSC Holdings III, LLC 9.50% 2014 | 5,150 | 3,927 | ||||||
1,157,767 | ||||||||
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 8.38% | ||||||||
Qwest Capital Funding, Inc. 7.90% 2010 | 18,285 | 17,782 | ||||||
Qwest Capital Funding, Inc. 7.25% 2011 | 83,750 | 78,725 | ||||||
Qwest Communications International Inc. 7.25% 2011 | 43,725 | 41,648 | ||||||
Qwest Corp. 8.875% 2012 | 3,600 | 3,546 | ||||||
Qwest Capital Funding, Inc. 7.625% 2021 | 1,325 | 1,014 | ||||||
U S WEST Capital Funding, Inc. 6.875% 2028 | 3,300 | 2,310 | ||||||
Sprint Capital Corp. 6.375% 2009 | 2,980 | 2,921 | ||||||
Sprint Nextel Corp. 4.169% 20102 | 5,120 | 4,771 | ||||||
Nextel Communications, Inc., Series E, 6.875% 2013 | 15,513 | 10,555 | ||||||
Nextel Communications, Inc., Series F, 5.95% 2014 | 71,690 | 48,083 | ||||||
Nextel Communications, Inc., Series D, 7.375% 2015 | 52,978 | 34,985 | ||||||
Sprint Nextel Corp. 6.00% 2016 | 25,250 | 19,472 | ||||||
Sprint Capital Corp. 6.90% 2019 | 15,655 | 12,154 | ||||||
Sprint Capital Corp. 8.75% 2032 | 13,245 | 10,353 | ||||||
Windstream Corp. 8.125% 2013 | 93,400 | 89,197 | ||||||
Valor Telecommunications Enterprises, LLC and Valor Telecommunications Enterprises Finance Corp. 7.75% 2015 | 31,370 | 29,919 | ||||||
Windstream Corp. 8.625% 2016 | 12,300 | 11,408 | ||||||
Centennial Communications Corp. 8.541% 20132 | 49,250 | 45,064 | ||||||
Centennial Communications Corp. 10.00% 2013 | 13,750 | 13,234 | ||||||
Centennial Communications Corp. and Centennial Cellular Operating Co. LLC 10.125% 2013 | 37,505 | 37,318 | ||||||
Centennial Communications Corp., Centennial Cellular Operating Co. LLC and | ||||||||
Centennial Puerto Rico Operations Corp. 8.125% 20142 | 24,175 | 24,054 | ||||||
American Tower Corp. 7.125% 2012 | 56,985 | 56,415 | ||||||
American Tower Corp. 7.50% 2012 | 14,100 | 13,959 | ||||||
American Tower Corp. 7.00% 20171 | 21,825 | 20,952 | ||||||
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., Term Loan B, 5.063% 20132,3,4 | 15,732 | 14,139 | ||||||
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. 9.25% 2014 | 58,200 | 54,708 | ||||||
Cricket Communications, Inc. 9.375% 2014 | 49,230 | 46,030 | ||||||
Cricket Communications, Inc. 10.875% 2014 | 16,875 | 15,778 | ||||||
Orascom Telecom 7.875% 20141 | 32,780 | 28,846 | ||||||
Digicel Group Ltd. 8.875% 20151 | 29,100 | 24,517 | ||||||
Cincinnati Bell Inc. 7.25% 2013 | 24,800 | 22,444 | ||||||
NTELOS Inc., Term Loan B, 5.96% 20112,3,4 | 20,751 | 19,701 | ||||||
Rogers Wireless Inc. 7.25% 2012 | 6,375 | 6,477 | ||||||
Rogers Wireless Inc. 7.50% 2015 | 12,025 | 12,239 | ||||||
Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. 8.486% 20132 | 19,715 | 3,844 | ||||||
Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. 9.75% 2013 | 23,340 | 4,785 | ||||||
Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc., Term Loan C, 6.262% 20142,3,4 | 8,877 | 6,239 | ||||||
Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc., Series B, 12.50% 2015 | 8,725 | 1,265 | ||||||
Level 3 Financing, Inc. 9.25% 2014 | 19,150 | 14,554 | ||||||
ALLTEL Corp., Term Loan B3, 4.997% 20152,3,4 | 12,177 | 11,925 | ||||||
Millicom International Cellular SA 10.00% 2013 | 10,050 | 10,000 | ||||||
Telecom Italia Capital SA 7.721% 2038 | 10,000 | 8,309 | ||||||
Trilogy International Partners LLC, Term Loan B, 7.262% 20122,3,4 | 10,475 | 8,275 | ||||||
Nordic Telephone Co. Holding ApS 8.875% 20161 | 7,900 | 7,229 | ||||||
Citizens Communications Co. 7.875% 2027 | 9,350 | 7,059 | ||||||
América Móvil, SAB de CV 8.46% 2036 | MXN65,000 | 5,228 | ||||||
Intelsat, Ltd. 6.50% 2013 | $ | 4,475 | 2,886 | |||||
966,316 | ||||||||
HEALTH CARE — 8.24% | ||||||||
Tenet Healthcare Corp. 6.375% 2011 | 9,820 | 9,108 | ||||||
Tenet Healthcare Corp. 7.375% 2013 | 16,435 | 15,038 | ||||||
Tenet Healthcare Corp. 9.875% 2014 | 149,910 | 146,912 | ||||||
Tenet Healthcare Corp. 9.25% 2015 | 51,220 | 48,659 | ||||||
Tenet Healthcare Corp. 6.875% 2031 | 200 | 137 | ||||||
HealthSouth Corp. 9.133% 20142 | 57,805 | 56,360 | ||||||
HealthSouth Corp. 10.75% 20168 | 86,990 | 90,035 | ||||||
VWR Funding, Inc. 10.25% 20152,5,8 | 116,360 | 98,906 | ||||||
HCA Inc., Term Loan B, 6.012% 20132,3,4 | 68,007 | 60,551 | ||||||
HCA Inc. 9.125% 2014 | 4,345 | 4,236 | ||||||
HCA Inc. 9.25% 2016 | 7,700 | 7,507 | ||||||
HCA Inc. 9.625% 20165 | 9,715 | 9,254 | ||||||
Elan Finance PLC and Elan Finance Corp. 7.75% 2011 | 5,375 | 4,891 | ||||||
Elan Finance PLC and Elan Finance Corp. 6.935% 20132 | 16,120 | 13,299 | ||||||
Elan Finance PLC and Elan Finance Corp. 8.875% 2013 | 65,255 | 55,140 | ||||||
PTS Acquisition Corp. 9.50% 20155,8 | 71,750 | 53,812 | ||||||
Boston Scientific Corp. 5.45% 2014 | 4,885 | 4,592 | ||||||
Boston Scientific Corp. 6.40% 2016 | 4,190 | 4,001 | ||||||
Boston Scientific Corp. 5.125% 2017 | 3,685 | 3,141 | ||||||
Boston Scientific Corp. 7.00% 2035 | 41,985 | 37,577 | ||||||
Warner Chilcott Corp. 8.75% 2015 | 35,474 | 35,119 | ||||||
Mylan Inc., Term Loan B, 7.063% 20142,3,4,8 | 35,298 | 32,474 | ||||||
Surgical Care Affiliates, Inc. 8.875% 20151,5,8 | 23,275 | 19,551 | ||||||
Surgical Care Affiliates, Inc. 10.00% 20171,8 | 17,585 | 12,837 | ||||||
Bausch & Lomb Inc. 9.875% 20151 | 33,050 | 31,480 | ||||||
Team Finance LLC and Health Finance Corp. 11.25% 20138 | 30,640 | 31,253 | ||||||
Viant Holdings Inc. 10.125% 20171 | 34,310 | 27,963 | ||||||
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. 8.875% 2015 | 18,210 | 17,391 | ||||||
Symbion Inc. 11.00% 20151,2,5 | 20,830 | 15,727 | ||||||
AMR HoldCo, Inc. and EmCare HoldCo, Inc. 10.00% 20158 | 2,625 | 2,704 | ||||||
949,655 | ||||||||
FINANCIALS — 8.01% | ||||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. 5.625% 2008 | 3,570 | 3,570 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. 4.904% 20091,2,8 | 5,250 | 4,830 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. 7.375% 20098 | 4,725 | 3,897 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. 8.625% 2010 | 3,805 | 2,699 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. 9.75% 20102,8 | 31,000 | 22,908 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. 7.25% 2011 | 5,000 | 3,181 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. 7.375% 2011 | 10,025 | 6,665 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. 9.875% 2011 | 5,000 | 3,451 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. 5.538% 20122,8 | 111,310 | 67,343 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. 7.80% 20128 | 3,000 | 1,932 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. 8.00% 2016 | 9,515 | 6,024 | ||||||
Residential Capital Corp. 8.125% 2008 | 2,515 | 2,150 | ||||||
GMAC LLC 4.054% 20092 | 1,300 | 941 | ||||||
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 5.625% 20098 | 18,000 | 13,344 | ||||||
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 5.85% 2009 | 5,000 | 4,274 | ||||||
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 7.75% 2010 | 18,000 | 10,780 | ||||||
Residential Capital Corp. 8.375% 20102 | 26,575 | 6,245 | ||||||
Residential Capital Corp. 8.50% 20101,8 | 2,174 | 1,196 | ||||||
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 7.25% 2011 | 47,035 | 22,257 | ||||||
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 6.625% 2012 | 3,000 | 1,271 | ||||||
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 6.875% 2012 | 11,450 | 4,554 | ||||||
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 7.00% 2012 | 22,550 | 9,197 | ||||||
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 5.011% 20142,8 | 15,000 | 5,550 | ||||||
General Motors Acceptance Corp. 6.75% 2014 | 4,120 | 1,583 | ||||||
Realogy Corp., Term Loan, Letter of Credit, 5.468% 20132,3,4 | 4,904 | 3,716 | ||||||
Realogy Corp., Term Loan B, 5.487% 20132,3,4 | 22,971 | 17,408 | ||||||
Realogy Corp. 10.50% 2014 | 110,055 | 48,974 | ||||||
Realogy Corp. 11.00% 20145 | 23,225 | 9,000 | ||||||
Realogy Corp. 12.375% 2015 | 9,625 | 3,321 | ||||||
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Series M, 4.125% 2009 | 19,776 | 18,192 | ||||||
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Series K, 5.625% 2009 | 8,522 | 8,061 | ||||||
Countrywide Financial Corp., Series A, 4.50% 2010 | 4,986 | 4,508 | ||||||
Countrywide Financial Corp., Series B, 5.80% 2012 | 24,715 | 20,895 | ||||||
Countrywide Financial Corp. 6.25% 2016 | 5,875 | 4,188 | ||||||
MBNA Capital A, Series A, 8.278% 2026 | 7,500 | 6,740 | ||||||
Countrywide Financial Corp., Series A, 0% 20371,2 | 15,000 | 14,775 | ||||||
Countrywide Financial Corp., Series A, 0% 20372 | 28,500 | 28,072 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., Series M, 8.125% noncumulative preferred (undated)2 | 9,000 | 7,283 | ||||||
E*TRADE Financial Corp. 8.00% 2011 | 22,475 | 19,666 | ||||||
E*TRADE Financial Corp. 7.375% 2013 | 4,375 | 3,587 | ||||||
E*TRADE Financial Corp. 7.875% 2015 | 36,920 | 29,721 | ||||||
CIT Group Inc. 2.925% 20092 | 7,980 | 6,825 | ||||||
CIT Group Inc. 4.125% 2009 | 19,548 | 16,980 | ||||||
CIT Group Inc. 4.25% 2010 | 21,925 | 14,455 | ||||||
CIT Group Inc. 5.40% 2012 | 541 | 311 | ||||||
CIT Group Inc. 7.625% 2012 | 16,615 | 10,548 | ||||||
CIT Group Inc. 7.75% 2012 | 578 | 405 | ||||||
CIT Group Inc. 5.40% 2013 | 80 | 45 | ||||||
CIT Group Inc. 5.65% 2017 | 3,385 | 1,654 | ||||||
Liberty Mutual Group Inc., Series A, 7.80% 20871 | 8,260 | 4,999 | ||||||
Liberty Mutual Group Inc., Series C, 10.75% 20881,2 | 59,740 | 43,085 | ||||||
Rouse Co. 3.625% 2009 | 12,415 | 11,111 | ||||||
Rouse Co. 7.20% 2012 | 12,145 | 8,684 | ||||||
Rouse Co. 5.375% 2013 | 22,130 | 13,610 | ||||||
Rouse Co. 6.75% 20131 | 17,950 | 12,296 | ||||||
TuranAlem Finance BV 7.875% 2010 | 10,000 | 7,950 | ||||||
TuranAlem Finance BV 7.75% 20131 | 8,500 | 5,170 | ||||||
TuranAlem Finance BV 8.50% 2015 | 4,000 | 2,500 | ||||||
TuranAlem Finance BV 8.50% 20151 | 2,280 | 1,425 | ||||||
TuranAlem Finance BV 8.25% 20371 | 17,970 | 10,108 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. 6.875% 2018 | 28,000 | 24,814 | ||||||
Citigroup Capital XXI 8.30% 20772 | 28,675 | 21,412 | ||||||
Kazkommerts International BV 8.50% 20131 | 3,500 | 2,275 | ||||||
Kazkommerts International BV 8.50% 2013 | 1,500 | 975 | ||||||
Kazkommerts International BV 7.875% 20141 | 10,000 | 5,950 | ||||||
Kazkommerts International BV 8.00% 20151 | 6,000 | 3,630 | ||||||
Kazkommerts International BV 8.00% 2015 | 3,000 | 1,815 | ||||||
Kazkommerts International BV, Series 4, 7.50% 2016 | 7,500 | 4,313 | ||||||
Host Marriott, LP, Series M, 7.00% 2012 | 11,100 | 9,962 | ||||||
Host Marriott, LP, Series K, 7.125% 2013 | 1,950 | 1,745 | ||||||
Host Hotels & Resorts, LP, Series S, 6.875% 2014 | 7,175 | 6,242 | ||||||
Lazard Group LLC 7.125% 2015 | 11,650 | 10,125 | ||||||
Lazard Group LLC 6.85% 2017 | 8,245 | 6,839 | ||||||
SLM Corp., Series A, 5.375% 2013 | 9,000 | 5,900 | ||||||
SLM Corp., Series A, 3.10% 20142 | 7,000 | 3,998 | ||||||
SLM Corp., Series A, 8.45% 2018 | 10,000 | 6,810 | ||||||
SMFG Preferred Capital USD 2 Ltd. 8.75% noncumulative preferred (undated)1 | 6,700 | 6,881 | ||||||
SMFG Preferred Capital USD 3 Ltd. 9.50% (undated)1,2 | 9,360 | 8,947 | ||||||
HSBK (Europe) BV 7.75% 2013 | 7,660 | 5,304 | ||||||
HSBK (Europe) BV 7.75% 20131 | 1,200 | 831 | ||||||
HSBK (Europe) BV 7.25% 20171 | 13,765 | 8,610 | ||||||
iStar Financial, Inc. 6.00% 2010 | 7,862 | 4,700 | ||||||
iStar Financial, Inc., Series B, 5.125% 2011 | 2,788 | 1,423 | ||||||
iStar Financial, Inc. 6.50% 2013 | 5,156 | 2,658 | ||||||
iStar Financial, Inc. 8.625% 2013 | 5,000 | 2,602 | ||||||
iStar Financial, Inc., Series B, 5.70% 2014 | 444 | 218 | ||||||
MetLife Capital Trust X 9.25% 20681,2 | 12,000 | 11,418 | ||||||
Capmark Financial Group Inc. 3.453% 20102 | 9,000 | 6,394 | ||||||
Capmark Financial Group Inc. 5.875% 2012 | 7,700 | 3,841 | ||||||
Wells Fargo Capital XV 9.75% (undated)2 | 9,600 | 9,321 | ||||||
International Lease Finance Corp., Series R, 6.375% 2013 | 7,900 | 4,993 | ||||||
International Lease Finance Corp., Series R, 5.65% 2014 | 4,000 | 2,359 | ||||||
Sovereign Bancorp, Inc. 3.44% 20102 | 10,475 | 7,338 | ||||||
LaBranche & Co Inc. 11.00% 2012 | 7,750 | 7,324 | ||||||
Advanta Capital Trust I, Series B, 8.99% 2026 | 12,000 | 6,540 | ||||||
Northern Rock PLC 5.60% (undated)1,2 | 900 | 472 | ||||||
Northern Rock PLC 6.594% (undated)1,2 | 11,400 | 5,985 | ||||||
Catlin Insurance Ltd. 7.249% (undated)1,2 | 14,250 | 6,369 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., Series I, 7.90% (undated)2 | 7,500 | 6,331 | ||||||
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Series G, 3.95% 20099 | 780 | 101 | ||||||
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Series G, 4.25% 20109 | 740 | 96 | ||||||
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Series I, 3.005% 20112,9 | 4,105 | 534 | ||||||
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Series I, 5.25% 20129 | 3,750 | 487 | ||||||
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. 6.625% 20129 | 1,875 | 244 | ||||||
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Series G, 4.80% 20149 | 5,000 | 650 | ||||||
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Series I, 6.20% 20149 | 4,640 | 603 | ||||||
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Series H, 5.50% 20169 | 360 | 47 | ||||||
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Series I, 6.875% 20189 | 26,750 | 3,477 | ||||||
Zions Bancorporation 5.65% 2014 | 10,000 | 6,112 | ||||||
Hospitality Properties Trust 5.125% 2015 | 3,640 | 2,810 | ||||||
Hospitality Properties Trust 6.30% 2016 | 155 | 123 | ||||||
Hospitality Properties Trust 5.625% 2017 | 270 | 199 | ||||||
Hospitality Properties Trust 6.70% 2018 | 2,945 | 2,318 | ||||||
National City Preferred Capital Trust I 12.00% (undated)2 | 12,500 | 5,422 | ||||||
Agile Property Holdings Ltd. 9.00% 2013 | 8,050 | 5,213 | ||||||
Banco Mercantil del Norte, SA 6.135% 20161,8 | 3,500 | 3,272 | ||||||
Banco Mercantil del Norte, SA 6.862% 20211,2 | 2,000 | 1,774 | ||||||
AmeriCredit Corp. 8.50% 2015 | 5,668 | 4,761 | ||||||
Chevy Chase Bank, FSB 6.875% 2013 | 5,500 | 4,427 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley 10.09% 2017 | BRL10,800 | 3,586 | ||||||
HBOS PLC 6.75% 20181 | $ | 3,300 | 2,772 | |||||
Barclays Bank PLC 7.70% (undated)1,2 | 3,000 | 2,474 | ||||||
UnumProvident Corp. 5.859% 2009 | 2,000 | 2,021 | ||||||
Schwab Capital Trust I 7.50% 20372 | 2,000 | 1,655 | ||||||
922,952 | ||||||||
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY — 7.27% | ||||||||
NXP BV and NXP Funding LLC 5.541% 20132 | 42,850 | 28,442 | ||||||
NXP BV and NXP Funding LLC 7.713% 20132 | € | 15,900 | 13,756 | |||||
NXP BV and NXP Funding LLC 7.875% 2014 | $ | 68,575 | 46,288 | |||||
NXP BV and NXP Funding LLC 8.625% 2015 | € | 64,225 | 44,272 | |||||
NXP BV and NXP Funding LLC 9.50% 2015 | $ | 156,040 | 80,751 | |||||
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Term Loan B, 4.236% 20132,3,4 | 4,888 | 4,014 | ||||||
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 6.694% 20142 | 3,000 | 2,025 | ||||||
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 8.875% 2014 | 32,425 | 22,535 | ||||||
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 9.125% 20145 | 206,112 | 130,881 | ||||||
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 10.125% 2016 | 75,425 | 48,649 | ||||||
Sanmina-SCI Corp. 6.75% 2013 | 35,865 | 31,561 | ||||||
Sanmina-SCI Corp. 5.569% 20141,2 | 17,000 | 14,875 | ||||||
Sanmina-SCI Corp. 8.125% 2016 | 57,375 | 49,056 | ||||||
First Data Corp., Term Loan B2, 5.948% 20142,3,4 | 66,254 | 57,476 | ||||||
First Data Corp. 9.875% 20151 | 34,685 | 27,271 | ||||||
Hughes Communications, Inc. 9.50% 2014 | 53,375 | 52,041 | ||||||
SunGard Data Systems Inc. 9.125% 2013 | 39,889 | 36,100 | ||||||
SunGard Data Systems Inc. 4.875% 2014 | 4,500 | 3,847 | ||||||
Sensata Technologies BV, Term Loan B, 4.543% 20132,3,4 | 5,624 | 4,775 | ||||||
Sensata Technologies BV 8.00% 20142 | 32,755 | 27,842 | ||||||
Ceridian Corp. 11.25% 20151 | 32,925 | 27,245 | ||||||
Jabil Circuit, Inc. 5.875% 2010 | 4,250 | 4,101 | ||||||
Jabil Circuit, Inc. 8.25% 2018 | 22,415 | 21,070 | ||||||
Serena Software, Inc. 10.375% 2016 | 24,540 | 21,718 | ||||||
Celestica Inc. 7.875% 2011 | 10,525 | 10,262 | ||||||
Celestica Inc. 7.625% 2013 | 5,475 | 5,010 | ||||||
Nortel Networks Ltd. 7.041% 20112 | 12,250 | 8,238 | ||||||
Nortel Networks Ltd. 10.125% 2013 | 3,665 | 2,355 | ||||||
Nortel Networks Ltd. 10.75% 2016 | 1,325 | 818 | ||||||
Xerox Corp. 7.125% 2010 | 3,650 | 3,735 | ||||||
Xerox Corp. 7.625% 2013 | 5,000 | 5,067 | ||||||
MagnaChip Semiconductor SA and MagnaChip Semiconductor Finance Co. 8.00% 2014 | 18,010 | 2,206 | ||||||
Exodus Communications, Inc. 11.625% 20108,9 | 3,761 | — | ||||||
838,282 | ||||||||
UTILITIES — 5.01% | ||||||||
Edison Mission Energy 7.50% 2013 | 44,900 | 43,329 | ||||||
Edison Mission Energy 7.75% 2016 | 15,125 | 14,293 | ||||||
Midwest Generation, LLC, Series B, 8.56% 20163 | 39,629 | 40,818 | ||||||
Edison Mission Energy 7.00% 2017 | 26,020 | 23,548 | ||||||
Edison Mission Energy 7.20% 2019 | 46,450 | 41,108 | ||||||
Homer City Funding LLC 8.734% 20263 | 9,179 | 9,363 | ||||||
Edison Mission Energy 7.625% 2027 | 36,280 | 29,568 | ||||||
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co. LLC, Term Loan B2, 6.303% 20142,3,4 | 15,880 | 13,418 | ||||||
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co. LLC 10.25% 20151 | 64,400 | 58,443 | ||||||
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co. LLC, Series B, 10.25% 20151 | 60,035 | 54,482 | ||||||
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co. LLC 10.50% 20161,5 | 12,000 | 10,230 | ||||||
Intergen Power 9.00% 20171 | 71,775 | 72,134 | ||||||
AES Corp. 9.50% 2009 | 2,638 | 2,625 | ||||||
AES Corp. 9.375% 2010 | 5,508 | 5,536 | ||||||
AES Corp. 8.875% 2011 | 8,475 | 8,390 | ||||||
AES Corp. 8.75% 20131 | 13,542 | 13,677 | ||||||
AES Gener SA 7.50% 2014 | 15,350 | 16,243 | ||||||
AES Corp. 7.75% 2015 | 2,000 | 1,825 | ||||||
AES Red Oak, LLC, Series A, 8.54% 20193 | 7,300 | 7,300 | ||||||
AES Red Oak, LLC, Series B, 9.20% 20293 | 5,000 | 4,900 | ||||||
NRG Energy, Inc. 7.25% 2014 | 22,925 | 21,320 | ||||||
NRG Energy, Inc. 7.375% 2016 | 33,700 | 30,414 | ||||||
Nevada Power Co., General and Refunding Mortgage Bonds, Series A, 8.25% 2011 | 4,000 | 4,290 | ||||||
Sierra Pacific Power Co., General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series H, 6.25% 2012 | 3,000 | 3,022 | ||||||
Nevada Power Co., General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series I, 6.50% 2012 | 2,650 | 2,690 | ||||||
Sierra Pacific Resources 8.625% 2014 | 12,000 | 12,350 | ||||||
Nevada Power Co., General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series L, 5.875% 2015 | 2,475 | 2,351 | ||||||
Nevada Power Co., General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series M, 5.95% 2016 | 1,600 | 1,514 | ||||||
Sierra Pacific Resources 6.75% 2017 | 2,000 | 1,838 | ||||||
ISA Capital do Brasil SA 7.875% 20121 | 3,275 | 3,152 | ||||||
ISA Capital do Brasil SA 8.80% 20171 | 11,800 | 11,358 | ||||||
Enersis SA 7.375% 2014 | 6,800 | 6,874 | ||||||
FPL Energy National Wind Portfolio, LLC 6.125% 20191,3 | 3,665 | 3,607 | ||||||
Abu Dhabi National Energy Co. PJSC (TAQA) 6.165% 20171 | 2,000 | 1,814 | ||||||
577,824 | ||||||||
MATERIALS — 4.81% | ||||||||
Jefferson Smurfit Corp. (U.S.) 8.25% 2012 | 33,010 | 27,728 | ||||||
Stone Container Corp. 8.375% 2012 | 12,840 | 10,850 | ||||||
Jefferson Smurfit Corp. (U.S.) 7.50% 2013 | 24,405 | 19,890 | ||||||
Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc. 8.00% 2017 | 18,885 | 14,825 | ||||||
Georgia Gulf Corp. 9.50% 2014 | 77,340 | 47,951 | ||||||
Nalco Co. 7.75% 2011 | 29,940 | 29,491 | ||||||
Nalco Co. 8.875% 2013 | 1,000 | 1,003 | ||||||
Nalco Co. 9.00% 2013 | € | 1,000 | 1,336 | |||||
Nalco Finance Holdings LLC and Nalco Finance Holdings Inc. 0%/9.00% 20146,8 | $ | 8,700 | 8,091 | |||||
Building Materials Corp. of America 7.75% 2014 | 45,035 | 35,803 | ||||||
Algoma Steel Inc., Term Loan B, 5.69% 20132,3,4 | 6,361 | 5,948 | ||||||
Algoma Steel Inc. 9.875% 20151 | 31,750 | 28,773 | ||||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. 6.875% 2014 | 3,000 | 2,973 | ||||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. 8.25% 2015 | 16,290 | 16,025 | ||||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. 8.375% 2017 | 12,345 | 12,178 | ||||||
Associated Materials Inc. 9.75% 2012 | 8,865 | 8,776 | ||||||
AMH Holdings, Inc. 0%/11.25% 20146 | 34,345 | 22,324 | ||||||
International Paper Co. 7.95% 2018 | 30,490 | 30,010 | ||||||
AEP Industries Inc. 7.875% 2013 | 23,280 | 17,576 | ||||||
Metals USA Holdings Corp. 8.791% 20122,5 | 18,795 | 15,130 | ||||||
Metals USA, Inc. 11.125% 2015 | 1,750 | 1,689 | ||||||
Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. 7.50% 2014 | 5,765 | 5,506 | ||||||
Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. 7.625% 2014 | € | 8,700 | 11,138 | |||||
Plastipak Holdings, Inc. 8.50% 20151,8 | $ | 20,340 | 16,577 | |||||
Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. 8.55% 2010 | 5,775 | 2,223 | ||||||
Abitibi-Consolidated Co. of Canada 15.50% 20101,8 | 2,810 | 1,911 | ||||||
Abitibi-Consolidated Co. of Canada 6.319% 20112 | 6,975 | 2,302 | ||||||
Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. 7.75% 2011 | 9,110 | 2,961 | ||||||
Abitibi-Consolidated Co. of Canada 6.00% 2013 | 3,000 | 810 | ||||||
Abitibi-Consolidated Co. of Canada 8.375% 2015 | 19,790 | 4,898 | ||||||
Georgia-Pacific Corp. 8.125% 2011 | 11,600 | 11,542 | ||||||
Georgia-Pacific Corp., First Lien Term Loan B, 4.567% 20122,3,4 | 3,782 | 3,320 | ||||||
Graphic Packaging International, Inc. 8.50% 2011 | 11,890 | 11,355 | ||||||
Graphic Packaging International, Inc. 9.50% 2013 | 2,425 | 2,207 | ||||||
NewPage Corp., Series B, 10.00% 2012 | 7,250 | 6,525 | ||||||
NewPage Corp., Series A, 12.00% 2013 | 6,150 | 5,412 | ||||||
Domtar Corp. 5.375% 2013 | 5,075 | 4,314 | ||||||
Domtar Corp. 7.125% 2015 | 7,810 | 7,224 | ||||||
MacDermid 9.50% 20171 | 13,150 | 11,112 | ||||||
Neenah Paper, Inc. 7.375% 2014 | 12,595 | 10,045 | ||||||
FMG Finance Pty Ltd. 10.625% 20161 | 10,100 | 9,948 | ||||||
Ryerson Inc. 10.176% 20141,2 | 2,100 | 1,722 | ||||||
Ryerson Inc. 12.00% 20151 | 9,450 | 8,080 | ||||||
Boise Cascade, LLC and Boise Cascade Finance Corp. 7.125% 20148 | 14,038 | 9,125 | ||||||
Vale Overseas Ltd. 6.25% 2017 | 3,700 | 3,476 | ||||||
Vale Overseas Ltd. 6.875% 2036 | 4,000 | 3,580 | ||||||
C10 Capital (SPV) Ltd. 6.722% (undated)1,2 | 6,850 | 6,360 | ||||||
Allegheny Technologies, Inc. 8.375% 2011 | 5,000 | 5,318 | ||||||
Momentive Performance Materials Inc. 9.75% 2014 | 5,000 | 3,975 | ||||||
Airgas, Inc. 6.25% 2014 | 3,500 | 3,307 | ||||||
Airgas, Inc. 7.125% 20181 | 650 | 632 | ||||||
Owens-Illinois, Inc. 7.50% 2010 | 2,000 | 1,990 | ||||||
Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc. 8.25% 2013 | 1,400 | 1,400 | ||||||
Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc. 6.75% 2014 | € | 375 | 462 | |||||
Smurfit Capital Funding PLC 7.50% 2025 | $ | 4,250 | 3,549 | |||||
Exopack Holding Corp. 11.25% 2014 | 3,650 | 3,084 | ||||||
Witco Corp. 6.875% 20268 | 5,080 | 2,972 | ||||||
Norampac Inc. 6.75% 2013 | 3,500 | 2,642 | ||||||
Novelis Inc. 7.25% 20152 | 2,750 | 2,406 | ||||||
Huntsman LLC 11.50% 2012 | 500 | 512 | ||||||
554,292 | ||||||||
ENERGY — 3.12% | ||||||||
Enterprise Products Operating LP 8.375% 20662 | 28,360 | 26,325 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Operating LP 7.034% 20682 | 96,310 | 77,771 | ||||||
Williams Companies, Inc. 4.791% 20101,2 | 28,000 | 27,495 | ||||||
Williams Companies, Inc. 6.375% 20101 | 6,000 | 5,883 | ||||||
Williams Companies, Inc. 8.125% 2012 | 9,800 | 9,909 | ||||||
Williams Companies, Inc. 7.875% 2021 | 1,650 | 1,653 | ||||||
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. 7.25% 2026 | 6,650 | 6,407 | ||||||
Williams Companies, Inc. 8.75% 2032 | 20,830 | 21,412 | ||||||
Petroplus Finance Ltd. 6.75% 20141 | 18,250 | 15,513 | ||||||
Petroplus Finance Ltd. 7.00% 20171 | 38,825 | 32,419 | ||||||
Drummond Co., Inc. 7.375% 20161 | 47,880 | 40,818 | ||||||
Williams Partners L.P. and Williams Partners Finance Corp. 7.50% 2011 | 11,375 | 11,154 | ||||||
Williams Partners L.P. and Williams Partners Finance Corp. 7.25% 2017 | 22,850 | 21,283 | ||||||
Gaz Capital SA 6.51% 20221 | 10,000 | 7,225 | ||||||
Gaz Capital SA 7.288% 20371 | 11,800 | 8,437 | ||||||
TEPPCO Partners LP 7.00% 20672 | 16,665 | 14,032 | ||||||
Pemex Project Funding Master Trust 7.875% 2009 | 1,135 | 1,151 | ||||||
Pemex Project Funding Master Trust 5.75% 20181 | 5,850 | 5,565 | ||||||
Pemex Project Funding Master Trust 6.625% 20351 | 6,500 | 5,985 | ||||||
Forest Oil Corp. 7.25% 2019 | 13,750 | 11,825 | ||||||
Enbridge Energy Partners, LP 8.05% 20672 | 7,220 | 6,132 | ||||||
TransCanada PipeLines Ltd. 6.35% 20672 | 1,450 | 1,149 | ||||||
359,543 | ||||||||
CONSUMER STAPLES — 3.02% | ||||||||
Stater Bros. Holdings Inc. 8.125% 2012 | 42,605 | 41,966 | ||||||
Stater Bros. Holdings Inc. 7.75% 2015 | 28,425 | 26,720 | ||||||
Dole Food Co., Inc. 8.625% 2009 | 11,600 | 11,136 | ||||||
Dole Food Co., Inc. 7.25% 2010 | 18,845 | 16,678 | ||||||
Dole Food Co., Inc. 8.875% 2011 | 24,960 | 21,091 | ||||||
SUPERVALU INC., Term Loan B, 4.679% 20122,3,4 | 9,248 | 8,431 | ||||||
SUPERVALU INC. 7.50% 2012 | 3,860 | 3,764 | ||||||
Albertson’s, Inc. 7.25% 2013 | 4,990 | 4,865 | ||||||
SUPERVALU INC. 7.50% 2014 | 1,000 | 975 | ||||||
Albertson’s, Inc. 8.00% 2031 | 32,750 | 30,515 | ||||||
Duane Reade Inc. 7.319% 20102 | 15,170 | 13,881 | ||||||
Duane Reade Inc. 9.75% 2011 | 32,910 | 27,809 | ||||||
Constellation Brands, Inc. 8.375% 2014 | 6,775 | 6,741 | ||||||
Constellation Brands, Inc. 7.25% 2017 | 31,375 | 29,022 | ||||||
Elizabeth Arden, Inc. 7.75% 2014 | 24,012 | 21,971 | ||||||
Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. 10.304% 20122,8 | 19,535 | 18,094 | ||||||
Yankee Candle Co., Inc., Series B, 8.50% 2015 | 23,350 | 17,046 | ||||||
JBS SA 10.50% 2016 | 13,930 | 10,761 | ||||||
Smithfield Foods, Inc., Series B, 8.00% 2009 | 3,000 | 2,925 | ||||||
Smithfield Foods, Inc., Series B, 7.75% 2013 | 1,800 | 1,521 | ||||||
Smithfield Foods, Inc. 7.75% 2017 | 7,850 | 6,201 | ||||||
Cott Beverages Inc. 8.00% 2011 | 14,500 | 10,222 | ||||||
Rite Aid Corp. 7.70% 2027 | 8,500 | 3,357 | ||||||
Rite Aid Corp. 6.875% 2028 | 12,977 | 4,737 | ||||||
Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. 7.625% 2015 | 5,800 | 3,625 | ||||||
Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. 8.375% 2017 | 4,800 | 2,280 | ||||||
American Achievement Group Holding 14.75% 20125 | 2,393 | 2,252 | ||||||
348,586 | ||||||||
Total corporate bonds, notes & loans | 9,165,096 | |||||||
BONDS & NOTES OF GOVERNMENTS & GOVERNMENT AGENCIES OUTSIDE THE U.S. — 3.49% | ||||||||
Brazilian Treasury Bill 6.00% 20108,10 | BRL87,765 | 43,629 | ||||||
Brazil (Federal Republic of) Global 10.50% 20148 | $ | 3,000 | 3,637 | |||||
Brazil (Federal Republic of) 10.00% 20178 | BRL13,000 | 5,495 | ||||||
Brazil (Federal Republic of) Global 8.00% 20183 | $ | 6,820 | 7,332 | |||||
Brazil (Federal Republic of) Global 10.25% 2028 | BRL15,000 | 6,964 | ||||||
Brazil (Federal Republic of) Global 7.125% 2037 | $ | 2,500 | 2,575 | |||||
Brazil (Federal Republic of) Global 11.00% 2040 | 12,485 | 15,684 | ||||||
Brazilian Treasury Bill 6.00% 20458,10 | BRL17,269 | 7,448 | ||||||
Turkey (Republic of) 15.00% 2010 | TRY16,262 | 12,243 | ||||||
Turkey (Republic of) 14.00% 2011 | 30,550 | 21,803 | ||||||
Turkey (Republic of) 16.00% 2012 | 16,000 | 11,754 | ||||||
Turkey (Republic of) 6.75% 2018 | $ | 3,250 | 3,071 | |||||
Colombia (Republic of) Global 11.75% 2010 | COP3,295,000 | 1,532 | ||||||
Colombia (Republic of) Global 10.00% 2012 | $ | 1,500 | 1,673 | |||||
Colombia (Republic of) Global 10.75% 2013 | 8,550 | 10,057 | ||||||
Colombia (Republic of) Global 8.25% 2014 | 4,000 | 4,360 | ||||||
Colombia (Republic of) Global 12.00% 2015 | COP17,130,000 | 8,242 | ||||||
Colombia (Republic of) Global 11.75% 2020 | $ | 1,936 | 2,686 | |||||
Colombia (Republic of) Global 9.85% 2027 | COP12,085,000 | 5,115 | ||||||
Colombia (Republic of) Global 10.375% 2033 | $ | 823 | 1,123 | |||||
Colombia (Republic of) Global 7.375% 2037 | 4,139 | 4,153 | ||||||
United Mexican States Government, Series M10, 10.50% 2011 | MXN12,320 | 1,257 | ||||||
United Mexican States Government Global 6.375% 2013 | $ | 6,970 | 7,183 | |||||
United Mexican States Government, Series MI10, 9.50% 2014 | MXN100,000 | 9,605 | ||||||
United Mexican States Government 5.00% 20168,10 | 60,164 | 5,970 | ||||||
United Mexican States Government, Series M20, 10.00% 2024 | 80,000 | 8,290 | ||||||
United Mexican States Government Global 6.75% 2034 | $ | 6,105 | 6,151 | |||||
Indonesia (Republic of) 12.50% 2013 | IDR77,730,000 | 8,129 | ||||||
Indonesia (Republic of) 6.875% 20171 | $ | 1,000 | 920 | |||||
Indonesia (Republic of) 6.875% 20181 | 3,725 | 3,408 | ||||||
Indonesia (Republic of) 11.50% 2019 | IDR25,000,000 | 2,385 | ||||||
Indonesia (Republic of) 11.00% 2020 | 69,275,000 | 6,349 | ||||||
Indonesia (Republic of) 12.80% 2021 | 25,440,000 | 2,616 | ||||||
Indonesia (Republic of) 12.90% 2022 | 54,492,000 | 5,625 | ||||||
Indonesia (Republic of) 11.00% 2025 | 40,562,000 | 3,601 | ||||||
Indonesia (Republic of) 10.25% 2027 | 725,000 | 60 | ||||||
Indonesia (Republic of) 6.625% 20371 | $ | 2,500 | 1,997 | |||||
Panama (Republic of) Global 7.125% 2026 | 585 | 603 | ||||||
Panama (Republic of) Global 8.875% 20278 | 6,500 | 7,758 | ||||||
Panama (Republic of) Global 6.70% 20363 | 28,009 | 26,609 | ||||||
Russian Federation 12.75% 2028 | 2,000 | 3,215 | ||||||
Russian Federation 7.50% 20303 | 23,388 | 23,680 | ||||||
Egypt (Arab Republic of) 9.10% 2010 | EGP50,497 | 9,059 | ||||||
Egypt (Arab Republic of) 9.10% 2010 | 3,130 | 557 | ||||||
Egypt (Arab Republic of) 11.50% 2011 | 9,380 | 1,723 | ||||||
Egypt (Arab Republic of) 9.10% 2012 | 18,225 | 3,093 | ||||||
Egypt (Arab Republic of) 11.625% 2014 | 49,265 | 9,008 | ||||||
Argentina (Republic of) 1.564% 20122,3,8 | $ | 12,100 | 4,351 | |||||
Argentina (Republic of) 5.83% 20333,5,8,10 | ARS 11,829 | 2,058 | ||||||
Argentina (Republic of) GDP-Linked 2035 | 201,406 | 5,433 | ||||||
Argentina (Republic of) GDP-Linked 2035 | $ | 35,979 | 2,914 | |||||
Argentina (Republic of) 0.63% 20383,8,10 | ARS111,941 | 6,798 | ||||||
Malaysian Government 3.833% 2011 | MYR44,500 | 12,884 | ||||||
Venezuela (Republic of) 10.75% 2013 | $ | 6,000 | 5,535 | |||||
Venezuela (Republic of) Global 8.50% 20148 | 1,250 | 1,025 | ||||||
Venezuela (Republic of) 7.65% 2025 | 8,455 | 5,158 | ||||||
Uruguay (Republic of) 4.25% 20273,8,10 | UYU139,476 | 6,071 | ||||||
Dominican Republic 9.50% 20113 | $ | 3,376 | 3,325 | |||||
Dominican Republic 9.50% 20111,3 | 2,062 | 2,031 | ||||||
Corporación Andina de Fomento 5.75% 2017 | 3,000 | 2,776 | ||||||
Thai Government 4.125% 2009 | THB73,490 | 2,180 | ||||||
401,966 | ||||||||
MORTGAGE-BACKED OBLIGATIONS3 — 1.29% | ||||||||
American Tower Trust I, Series 2007-1A, Class E, 6.249% 20371,8 | $ | 10,725 | 8,472 | |||||
American Tower Trust I, Series 2007-1A, Class F, 6.639% 20371,8 | 38,760 | 29,931 | ||||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, Series 2006-1, Class F, 6.650% 20361,8 | 30,490 | 26,427 | ||||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, Series 2006-1, Class G, 6.795% 20361,8 | 12,250 | 10,667 | ||||||
SBA CMBS Trust, Series 2006-1A, Class F, 6.709% 20361 | 1,450 | 1,372 | ||||||
SBA CMBS Trust, Series 2006-1A, Class G, 6.904% 20361 | 5,950 | 5,647 | ||||||
SBA CMBS Trust, Series 2006-1A, Class H, 7.389% 20361 | 11,615 | 10,064 | ||||||
SBA CMBS Trust, Series 2006-1A, Class J, 7.825% 20361 | 12,950 | 11,891 | ||||||
Countrywide Alternative Loan Trust, Series 2005-64CB, Class 2-A-1, 6.00% 2035 | 28,218 | 17,986 | ||||||
Countrywide Alternative Loan Trust, Series 2007-14T2, Class A-4, 3.557% 20372 | 8,033 | 4,532 | ||||||
Tower Ventures, LLC, Series 2006-1, Class E, 6.495% 20361,8 | 4,000 | 3,585 | ||||||
Tower Ventures, LLC, Series 2006-1, Class F, 7.036% 20361,8 | 20,405 | 18,136 | ||||||
148,710 | ||||||||
U.S. TREASURY BONDS & NOTES — 0.21% | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury 6.00% 2026 | 21,000 | 24,932 | ||||||
ASSET-BACKED OBLIGATIONS3 — 0.08% | ||||||||
Green Tree Financial Corp., Series 2008-MH1, Class A-3, 8.97% 20381,8 | 6,000 | 5,178 | ||||||
CWHEQ Revolving Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-I, Class 2-A, FSA insured, 2.628% 20372 | 5,123 | 3,951 | ||||||
9,129 | ||||||||
Total bonds, notes & other debt instruments (cost: $11,925,450,000) | 9,749,833 | |||||||
Convertible securities — 0.50% | Shares or principal amount | |||||||
CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY — 0.25% | ||||||||
Amazon.com, Inc. 6.875% PEACS convertible notes 2010 | € | 20,645,000 | 28,608 | |||||
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY — 0.15% | ||||||||
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 6.00% convertible notes 2015 | $ | 18,000,000 | 8,843 | |||||
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 5.75% convertible notes 2012 | $ | 13,900,000 | 7,992 | |||||
16,835 | ||||||||
FINANCIALS — 0.06% | ||||||||
Citigroup Inc., Series J, 7.00% noncumulative convertible preferred depositary shares7,8 | 150,000 | 6,458 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, Series 2004-1, 5.375% convertible preferred | 177 | 619 | ||||||
7,077 | ||||||||
HEALTH CARE — 0.04% | ||||||||
Schering-Plough Corp., 6.00% convertible preferred 2010 | 29,900 | 5,173 | ||||||
Total convertible securities (cost: $72,079,000) | 57,693 | |||||||
Preferred securities — 0.70% | Shares | |||||||
FINANCIALS — 0.70% | ||||||||
Swire Pacific Capital Ltd. 8.84% cumulative guaranteed perpetual capital securities1 | 1,125,000 | 33,398 | ||||||
Citigroup Inc., Series E, 8.40%2 | 26,500,000 | 18,071 | ||||||
Shinsei Finance II (Cayman) Ltd. 7.16% noncumulative1,2 | 26,075,000 | 13,380 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., Series K, 8.00% noncumulative2 | 5,000,000 | 3,965 | ||||||
RBS Capital Trust IV 4.562% noncumulative trust2 | 4,000,000 | 2,988 | ||||||
ILFC E-Capital Trust II 6.25%1,2 | 8,000,000 | 2,393 | ||||||
Chevy Chase Preferred Capital Corp., Series A, 10.375% exchangeable | 55,994 | 2,164 | ||||||
SMFG Preferred Capital USD 1 Ltd. 6.078%1,2 | 2,770,000 | 1,992 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, Series S, 8.25% noncumulative | 523,450 | 1,080 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, Series O, 7.00%1,2 | 174,640 | 475 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, Series Z, 8.375% | 320,000 | 513 | ||||||
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc., Series A, 8.50% noncumulative1 | 2,406,000 | 24 | ||||||
Total preferred securities (cost: $188,899,000) | 80,443 | |||||||
Value | ||||||||
Common stocks — 1.25% | Shares | (000 | ) | |||||
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.47% | ||||||||
AT&T Inc. | 1,000,000 | $ | 27,920 | |||||
American Tower Corp., Class A11 | 538,967 | 19,387 | ||||||
Sprint Nextel Corp., Series 1 | 777,508 | 4,743 | ||||||
Embarq Corp. | 38,875 | 1,576 | ||||||
Cincinnati Bell Inc.11 | 70,740 | 219 | ||||||
XO Holdings, Inc.11 | 25,291 | 10 | ||||||
53,855 | ||||||||
INDUSTRIALS — 0.24% | ||||||||
Northwest Airlines Corp.11 | 1,407,835 | 12,713 | ||||||
DigitalGlobe Inc.7,8,11 | 3,064,647 | 10,726 | ||||||
Delta Air Lines, Inc.11 | 476,419 | 3,549 | ||||||
UAL Corp.11 | 22,911 | 202 | ||||||
27,190 | ||||||||
CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY — 0.18% | ||||||||
Ford Motor Co.11 | 1,877,140 | 9,761 | ||||||
Time Warner Cable Inc., Class A11 | 374,652 | 9,067 | ||||||
Adelphia Recovery Trust, Series Arahova8,11 | 1,773,964 | 798 | ||||||
Adelphia Recovery Trust, Series ACC-111 | 16,413,965 | 328 | ||||||
Adelphia Recovery Trust, Series ACC-6B8,11 | 3,619,600 | 72 | ||||||
CBS Corp., Class B | 31,612 | 461 | ||||||
Emmis Communications Corp., Class A11 | 201,000 | 195 | ||||||
Radio One, Inc., Class D, nonvoting11 | 44,000 | 33 | ||||||
Radio One, Inc., Class A11 | 22,000 | 31 | ||||||
Mobile Travel Guide, Inc.7,8,11 | 83,780 | 21 | ||||||
20,767 | ||||||||
UTILITIES — 0.14% | ||||||||
Drax Group PLC | 1,230,700 | 16,463 | ||||||
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY — 0.11% | ||||||||
Micron Technology, Inc.1,11 | 678,656 | 2,749 | ||||||
Micron Technology, Inc.11 | 424,160 | 1,718 | ||||||
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.11 | 500,000 | 4,445 | ||||||
ZiLOG, Inc.11,12 | 1,140,500 | 3,661 | ||||||
HSW International, Inc.7,8,11 | 257,091 | 477 | ||||||
13,050 | ||||||||
HEALTH CARE — 0.08% | ||||||||
UnitedHealth Group Inc. | 375,000 | 9,521 | ||||||
Clarent Hospital Corp.8,11,12 | 576,849 | 29 | ||||||
9,550 | ||||||||
CONSUMER STAPLES — 0.03% | ||||||||
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.11 | 194,677 | 2,706 | ||||||
Total common stocks (cost: $217,126,000) | 143,581 | |||||||
Warrants — 0.00% | ||||||||
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.00% | ||||||||
XO Holdings, Inc., Series A, warrants, expire 201011 | 50,587 | 1 | ||||||
XO Holdings, Inc., Series B, warrants, expire 20108,11 | 37,939 | 1 | ||||||
XO Holdings, Inc., Series C, warrants, expire 201011 | 37,939 | 1 | ||||||
GT Group Telecom Inc., warrants, expire 20101,8,11 | 11,000 | — | ||||||
Total warrants (cost: $572,000) | 3 | |||||||
Principal amount | Value | |||||||
Short-term securities — 11.13% | (000 | ) | (000 | ) | ||||
AT&T Inc. 2.15%–2.20% due 10/14–11/25/20081 | $ | 146,700 | $ | 146,120 | ||||
Hewlett-Packard Co. 2.16%–3.00% due 10/2–11/19/20081 | 129,200 | 128,932 | ||||||
Procter & Gamble International Funding S.C.A. 2.08%–2.18% due 10/14–12/2/20081 | 85,800 | 85,581 | ||||||
Freddie Mac 2.13%–2.40% due 11/18–12/30/2008 | 85,200 | 84,919 | ||||||
Illinois Tool Works Inc. 2.12%–2.15% due 10/1–11/21/2008 | 72,500 | 72,294 | ||||||
Fannie Mae 2.25%–2.90% due 12/8–12/24/2008 | 70,100 | 69,917 | ||||||
Merck & Co. Inc. 2.10%–2.20% due 10/24–10/31/2008 | 67,400 | 67,288 | ||||||
Pfizer Inc 2.09%–2.17% due 10/8–11/7/20081 | 65,000 | 64,871 | ||||||
Medtronic Inc. 2.07%–2.08% due 10/22–11/20/20081 | 64,900 | 64,741 | ||||||
NetJets Inc. 2.10% due 10/21/20081 | 50,000 | 49,939 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank 2.60%–3.10% due 12/12–12/15/2008 | 45,100 | 44,974 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp. 2.69% due 11/18/2008 | 25,200 | 25,088 | ||||||
Ranger Funding Co. LLC 3.50% due 11/6/20081 | 18,000 | 17,935 | ||||||
Coca-Cola Co. 2.13%–2.15% due 10/17/2008–1/16/20091 | 43,000 | 42,762 | ||||||
Johnson & Johnson 2.03%–2.05% due 11/13–11/20/20081 | 42,100 | 41,918 | ||||||
Variable Funding Capital Corp. 2.49% due 10/8/20081 | 30,900 | 30,883 | ||||||
Jupiter Securitization Co., LLC 5.50% due 10/1/20081 | 15,500 | 15,498 | ||||||
Park Avenue Receivables Co., LLC 2.62% due 10/20/20081 | 13,000 | 12,981 | ||||||
IBM International Group Capital LLC 2.09% due 10/9/20081 | 26,500 | 26,486 | ||||||
Honeywell International Inc. 2.07% due 10/16/20081 | 25,600 | 25,569 | ||||||
Walt Disney Co. 2.00% due 10/9/2008 | 25,000 | 24,988 | ||||||
John Deere Credit Ltd. 2.12% due 10/10/2008 | 25,000 | 24,985 | ||||||
Harvard University 2.08% due 10/14/2008 | 25,000 | 24,974 | ||||||
CAFCO, LLC 2.62% due 10/24/20081 | 25,000 | 24,956 | ||||||
Private Export Funding Corp. 2.20% due 12/8/20081 | 25,000 | 24,832 | ||||||
United Parcel Service Inc. 2.04% due 10/2/20081 | 20,000 | 19,998 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co. 2.57% due 10/15/2008 | 19,600 | 19,579 | ||||||
Total short-term securities (cost: $1,283,268,000) | 1,283,008 | |||||||
Total investment securities (cost: $13,687,394,000) | 11,314,561 | |||||||
Other assets less liabilities | 213,684 | |||||||
Net assets | $ | 11,528,245 |
1 | Purchased in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. May be resold in the U.S. in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. The total value of all such securities was $2,588,026,000, which represented 22.45% of the net assets of the fund. |
2 | Coupon rate may change periodically. |
3 | Principal payments may be made periodically. Therefore, the effective maturity date may be earlier than the stated maturity date. |
4 | Loan participations and assignments; may be subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. The total value of all such loans was $686,496,000, which represented 5.95% of the net assets of the fund. |
5 | Payment in kind; the issuer has the option of paying additional securities in lieu of cash. |
6 | Step bond; coupon rate will increase at a later date. |
7 | Purchased in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. May be subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Further details on these holdings appear below. |
Acquisition date(s) | Cost (000) | Value (000) | Percent of net assets | ||||||||||
Gray Television Inc., Series D, 12.00%/15.00% (undated) | 6/26/2008–7/15/2008 | $ | 61,275 | $ | 56,438 | .49 | % | ||||||
DigitalGlobe Inc. | 4/14/1999–7/31/2003 | 2,500 | 10,726 | .09 | |||||||||
Citigroup Inc., Series J, 7.00%, | |||||||||||||
noncumulative convertible preferred depositary shares | 1/15/2008 | 7,500 | 6,458 | .06 | |||||||||
HSW International, Inc. | 12/17/2007 | 791 | 477 | — | |||||||||
Mobil Travel Guide, Inc. | 12/17/2007 | 21 | 21 | — | |||||||||
Total restricted securities | $ | 72,087 | $ | 74,120 | .64 | % |
8 | Valued under fair value procedures adopted by authority of the board of trustees. The total value of all such securities was $994,753,000, which represented 8.63% of the net assets of the fund. |
9 | Scheduled interest and/or principal payment was not received. |
10 | Index-linked bond whose principal amount moves with a government retail price index. |
11 | Security did not produce income during the last 12 months. |
12 | Represents an affiliated company as defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940. |
Key to abbreviations and symbols | |
ARS = Argentine pesos | IDR = Indonesian rupiah |
BRL = Brazilian reais | MXN = Mexican pesos |
COP = Colombian pesos | MYR = Malaysian ringgits |
EGP = Egyptian pounds | THB = Thai baht |
€ = Euros | TRY = New Turkish liras |
£ = British pounds | UYU = Uruguayan pesos |
Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so you may lose money.
Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the American Funds. This and other important information is contained in each fund’s prospectus, which can be obtained from your financial professional and should be read carefully before investing.
MFGEFP-921-1108O-S15843
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
American High-Income Trust:
We have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the financial statements of American High-Income Trust (the “Fund”) as of September 30, 2008, and for the year then ended and have issued our report thereon dated November 10, 2008, which report and financial statements are included in Item 1 of this Certified Shareholder Report on Form N-CSR. Our audit also included the Fund’s investment portfolio (the “Schedule”) as of September 30, 2008, appearing in Item 6 of this Form N-CSR. This Schedule is the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, the Schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole of the Fund referred to above, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Costa Mesa, California
November 10, 2008
ITEM 7 – Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable to this Registrant, insofar as the Registrant is not a closed-end management investment company.
ITEM 8 – Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable to this Registrant, insofar as the Registrant is not a closed-end management investment company.
ITEM 9 – Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers
Not applicable to this Registrant, insofar as the Registrant is not a closed-end management investment company.
ITEM 10 – Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant’s board of trustees since the Registrant last submitted a proxy statement to its shareholders. The procedures are as follows. The Registrant has a nominating and governance committee comprised solely of persons who are not considered ‘‘interested persons’’ of the Registrant within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The committee periodically reviews such issues as the board’s composition, responsibilities, committees, compensation and other relevant issues, and recommends any appropriate changes to the full board of trustees. While the committee normally is able to identify from its own resources an ample number of qualified candidates, it will consider shareholder suggestions of persons to be considered as nominees to fill future vacancies on the board. Such suggestions must be sent in writing to the nominating and governance committee of the Registrant, c/o the Registrant’s Secretary, and must be accompanied by complete biographical and occupational data on the prospective nominee, along with a written consent of the prospective nominee for consideration of his or her name by the nominating and governance committee.
ITEM 11 – Controls and Procedures
(a) | The Registrant’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 30a-3 under the Investment Company Act of 1940), that such controls and procedures are adequate and reasonably designed to achieve the purposes described in paragraph (c) of such rule. |
(b) | There were no changes in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) that occurred during the Registrant’s second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
ITEM 12 – Exhibits
(a)(1) | The Code of Ethics that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2 is attached as an exhibit hereto. |
(a)(2) | The certifications required by Rule 30a-2 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are attached as exhibits hereto. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AMERICAN HIGH-INCOME TRUST | |
By /s/ David C. Barclay | |
David C. Barclay, President and Principal Executive Officer | |
Date: December 8, 2008 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By /s/ David C. Barclay |
David C. Barclay, President and Principal Executive Officer |
Date: December 8, 2008 |
By /s/ Ari M. Vinocor |
Ari M. Vinocor, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer |
Date: December 8, 2008 |