Exhibit 95
Item5. Other Information
Mine Safety and Health Administration Safety Data
The Company is committed to the safety of its employees and in achieving a goal of providing a workplace that is incident free. In achieving this goal the company has in place health and safety programs that include regulatory-based training, accident prevention, workplace inspection, emergency preparedness response, accident investigations and program auditing. These programs are designed to comply with regulatory mining-related coking coal safety and environmental standards. Additionally, the programs provide a basis for promoting a best in industry safety practice.
The operation of our mines is subject to regulation by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (“the Mine Act”). MSHA inspects our mines on a continual basis and issues various citations and orders when it believes a violation has occurred under the Mine Act. As required by Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, each operator of a coal or other mine is required to include certain mine safety results in its periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Within this disclosure, we present information regarding certain mining safety and health citations which MSHA has issued with respect to our mining operations. In evaluating this information, consideration should be given to facts such as: (i) the number of citations and orders will vary depending on the size of the coal mine, (ii) the number of citations issued will vary from inspector to inspector and mine to mine, and (iii) citations and orders can be contested and appealed, and in that process, are sometimes dismissed and remaining citations are often reduced in severity and amount.
During the calendar year ended December 31, 2011 none of the Company’s mining complexes received written notice from MSHA of (i) a pattern of violations of mandatory health or safety standards that are of such nature as could have significantly and substantially contributed to the cause and effect of coal or other mine health or safety hazards under section 104(e) or (ii) the potential to have such a pattern. (1)
The table below presents the total number of specific citations and orders issued by MSHA to Walter Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries, together with the total dollar value of the proposed MSHA civil penalty assessments received during the calendar year ended December 31, 2011. The second table presents legal actions pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission for each of our mining complexes that had pending legal actions during the calendar year ended December 31, 2011.
Mining Complex(2) (7) |
| Section |
| Section |
| Section |
| Section |
| Section |
| Proposed |
| Fatalities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JWR No. 4 |
| 241 |
| 4 | (3) | 13 |
| — |
| 2 | (4) | 923.1 |
| — |
|
JWR No. 5 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JWR No. 7 |
| 199 |
| 1 |
| 5 |
| — |
| 2 |
| 586.4 |
| — |
|
JWR Central Shop |
| 4 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1.16 |
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JWR North River |
| 89 |
| 1 |
| 3 |
| — |
| 1 |
| 56.9 |
| — |
|
Taft Reid School |
| 3 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1.4 |
| — |
|
TRI East Brookwood |
| 2 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 3.4 |
| — |
|
TRI Highway 59 |
| 5 |
| — |
| 3 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
TRI Swann’s Crossing |
| 6 |
| — |
| 2 |
| — |
| — |
| 0.8 |
| — |
|
Atlantic Leaseco King Coal 1 Mine |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Atlantic Leaseco King Coal 1 Prep Plant |
| 1 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 5.2 |
| — |
|
Atlantic Leaseco Black Pearl |
| 21 |
| 2 |
| 9 |
| — |
| — |
| 137.2 |
| — |
|
Atlantic Leaseco Cowen Loadout |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 0.2 |
| — |
|
Maple Coal Maple Eagle No. 1 |
| 53 |
| 2 |
| 17 |
| — |
| — |
| 789.4 |
| 1 | (6) |
Maple Coal Maple Prep Plant |
| 2 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2.8 |
| — |
|
Maple Coal Huffman Sycamore SM |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 18 |
| — |
|
(1) On May 17, 2011, Maple Eagle No. 1 Mine was notified by MSHA that it would not be issued a notice of Pattern of Violations.
(2) MSHA assigns an identification number to each coal mine and may or may not assign separate identification numbers to related facilities such as preparation plants. We are providing the information in the table by mining complex rather than MSHA identification number because we believe that this presentation is more useful to investors. For descriptions of each of these mining operations, please refer to the descriptions under Item 1. Description of Business, in Part 1 of our Annual Report on Form-10K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. Idle facilities are not included in the table above unless they received a citation, order or assessment by MSHA during the current quarterly reporting period or are subject to pending legal actions.
(3) On June 28, 2011, Jim Walter Resources, Inc., (“JWR”) a subsidiary of Walter Energy, Inc., and the operator of the Company’s No. 4 Mine, received order No. 6699989 (the “b-Order”) under section 104(b) of the Mine Act. MSHA District 11 notified No. 4 Mine on July 5, 2011 that it was vacating 104(b) Order 6699989, after additional review revealed that it had been issued in error.
(4) On April 14, 2011, Jim Walter Resources, Inc., (“JWR”) a subsidiary of Walter Energy, Inc., and the operator of the Company’s No. 4 Mine, received an imminent danger order No. 8519737 (the “Order”) under section 107(a) of the Mine Act. No. 4 Mine contested the issuance of the Order in a legal action before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, Docket No. SE 2011-479-R. On June 13, 2011, the Secretary of Labor, advised the Court, via email to the Court and JWR’s Counsel, that she had decided to vacate the Order. The Secretary’s action was a unilateral decision on the Secretary’s part and was not conditioned upon any action being undertaken by Jim Walter Resources. The Court issued an order dismissing Docket No. SE 2011-479-R on June 13, 2011.
(5) Amounts listed under this heading include proposed assessments received from MSHA in the current annual reporting period for alleged violations, regardless of the issuance date of the related citation or order.
(6) On December 5, 2011, an underground miner at Maple Eagle No. 1 Mine suffered an apparent heart attack while at work. The miner was taken to a local hospital where he died a few days later. MSHA has established policies and procedures for determining whether a fatality is unrelated to mining activity, such as homicides, suicides, and deaths by natural causes (commonly referred to as “non-chargeable” to the mining industry.) The SEC’s final rules implementing Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act specify that disclosure is required of all fatalities, unless the fatality is determined to be “non-chargeable.” SEC rules specify that until MSHA’s fatality review committee has formally declared a fatality to be “non-chargeable,” it must be disclosed. MSHA regulations require mine operators to report to MSHA all fatalities that occur at a mine. MSHA initiated a Non-Chargeable Accident Investigation into the fatality, which is pending. Based on past MSHA practice, Walter Energy is confident that MSHA will declare the fatality to be non-chargeable.
(7) The table includes references to specific sections of the Mine Act as follows:
· Section 104(a) Citations include citations for health or safety standards that could significantly and substantially contribute to serious injury if left unabated.
· Section 104(b) Orders represent failures to abate a citation under 104(a) within the period of time prescribed by MSHA and that the period of time prescribed for the abatement should not be further extended. This results in an order of immediate withdrawal from the area of the mine affected by the condition until MSHA determines that the violation has been abated.
· Section 104(d) Citations and Orders are for unwarrantable failure to comply with mandatory health and safety standards where such violation is of such a nature as could significantly or substantially contribute to the cause and effect of a coal or other mine safety or health hazard.
· Section 110(b)(2) Violations are for flagrant violations.
· Section 107(a) Orders are for situations in which MSHA determined an imminent danger existed.
Mining Complex Legal Actions(1) |
| Pending as of |
| Initiated |
| Resolved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JWR No. 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart B |
| 8 |
| 4 |
| 9 |
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart C |
| 38 |
| 13 |
| 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JWR No. 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart C |
| 1 |
| — |
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JWR No. 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart B |
| 13 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart C |
| 47 |
| 17 |
| 13 |
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart H |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JWR North River |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart B |
| 8 |
| 3 |
| — |
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart C |
| 20 |
| 11 |
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taft Reid School |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart C |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRI East Brookwood |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart C |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlantic Leaseco King Coal 1 Mine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart C |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlantic Leaseco Black Pearl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart C |
| 13 |
| 6 |
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maple Coal Maple Eagle No. 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart B |
| 23 |
| 21 |
| 23 |
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart C |
| 33 |
| 19 |
| 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maple Coal Maple Prep Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart C |
| 1 |
| — |
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maple Coal Huffman Sycamore SM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart C |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| — |
|
(1) Effective January 27, 2011, SEC adopted amendments to its rules to implement Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “final rule”.) The final rule modified previous reporting requirements and requires that the total number of legal actions pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC) as of the last day of the time period covered by the report be categorized according to type of proceeding, in accordance with the categories established in the Procedural Rules of FMSHRC. SEC rules require that six different categories of pending legal actions be disclosed. Categories for which there is no pending litigation for the respective mine are not listed in the table. The types of proceedings are listed as follows:
· “29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart B” These legal actions include proceedings initiated under FMSHRC Procedural Rule 29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart B such as contests of citations and orders filed prior to receipt of a proposed penalty assessment from MSHA, contests related to orders for which penalties are not assessed (such as imminent danger orders under Section 107 of the Mine Act), and emergency response plan dispute proceedings.
· “29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart C” These legal actions include proceedings initiated under FMSHRC Procedural Rule 29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart C and are contests of citations and orders after receipt of proposed penalties.
· “29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart D” These legal actions include proceedings initiated under FMSHRC Procedural Rule 29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart D and are complaints for compensation, which are cases under section 111 of the Mine Act.
· “29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart E” These legal actions include proceedings initiated under FMSHRC Procedural Rule 29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart E and are complaints of discharge, discrimination or interference and temporary reinstatement under section 105 of the Mine Act.
· “29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart F” These legal actions include proceedings initiated under FMSHRC Procedural Rule 29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart F such as applications for temporary relief under section 105(b)(2) of the Mine Act from any modification or termination of any order issued thereunder, or from any order issued under section 104 of the Mine Act (other than citations issued under section 104(a) or (f) of the Mine Act).
· “29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart H” These legal actions include proceedings initiated under under FMSHRC Procedural Rule 29 CFR Part 2700, Subpart H and are appeals of judges’ decisions or orders to FMSHRC, including petitions for discretionary review and review by FMSHRC on its own motion.