UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORMN-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number811-5867
Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
6803 South Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112-3924
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Cynthia Lo Bessette
OFI Global Asset Management, Inc.
225 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10281-1008
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(303)768-3200
Date of fiscal year end:July 31
Date of reporting period:1/31/2019
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-19-099391/g683719page001.jpg)
Important Updates
On October 18, 2018, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, an indirect corporate parent of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. and its subsidiaries OFI Global Asset Management, Inc., OFI SteelPath, Inc. and OFI Advisors, LLC, announced that it has entered into an agreement whereby Invesco Ltd., a global investment management company, will acquire OppenheimerFunds, Inc. As of the date of this report, the transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2019, pending necessary regulatory and other third-party approvals. This is subject to change. See the Notes to Financial Statements for more information.
Update to Shareholder Report Document Delivery
Beginning January 1, 2021, OppenheimerFunds will send a notice, either by mail or email, each time your fund’s updated report is available on our website (oppenheimerfunds.com). Investors who are not enrolled in electronic delivery by January 1, 2021 will receive the notice in the mail. Enrolling in electronic delivery will enable you to receive a direct link to your full shareholder report the moment it becomes available, and limit the amount of mail you receive. All investors who prefer to receive shareholder reports in paper may, at any time, choose that option.
How do you update your delivery preferences?
If you own these shares through a financial intermediary, you may contact your financial intermediary.
If your accounts are held through OppenheimerFunds and you receive statements, confirms, and other documents directly from us, you can enroll in our eDocs DirectSM service atoppenheimerfunds.com or by calling us. Once you’re enrolled, you’ll begin to receive email notifications of updated documents when they become available. If you have any questions, feel free to call us at1.800.225.5677.
Table of Contents
Class A Shares
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS AT 1/31/19
| | | | | | |
| | Class A Shares of the Fund | | |
| | Without Sales Charge | | With Sales Charge | | Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Index |
6-Month | | 2.64% | | -2.24% | | 2.05% |
1-Year | | 13.89 | | 8.48 | | 3.26 |
5-Year | | 4.68 | | 3.67 | | 3.57 |
10-Year | | 7.46 | | 6.94 | | 4.55 |
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results.The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Fund returns include changes in share price, reinvested distributions, and a 4.75% maximum applicable sales charge except where “without sales charge” is indicated. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized. Returns do not consider capital gains or income taxes on an individual’s investment. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). See Fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses for more information on share classes and sales charges.
Our Twitter handle is @RochesterFunds.
|
3 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
Top Holdings and Allocations
TOP TEN CATEGORIES
| | | | |
Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement | | | 12.9 | % |
Transportation Infrastructure | | | 9.7 | |
Government Appropriation | | | 8.9 | |
Higher Education | | | 7.7 | |
Marine/Aviation Facilities | | | 7.6 | |
Education | | | 6.5 | |
Sales Tax Revenue | | | 6.4 | |
Hospital/Healthcare | | | 6.3 | |
General Obligation | | | 5.9 | |
Casino | | | 4.7 | |
Portfolio holdings are subject to change. Percentages are as of January 31, 2019 and are based on total assets.
CREDIT ALLOCATION
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | NRSRO- Rated | | | Sub- Adviser- Rated | | | Total | |
AAA | | | 0.6% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 0.6% | |
AA | | | 15.0 | | | | 2.2 | | | | 17.2 | |
A | | | 21.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 21.6 | |
BBB | | | 36.8 | | | | 0.4 | | | | 37.2 | |
BB or lower | | | 19.1 | | | | 4.3 | | | | 23.4 | |
Total | | | 93.1% | | | | 6.9% | | | | 100.0% | |
The percentages above are based on the market value of the securities as of January 31, 2019 and are subject to change. OppenheimerFunds, Inc. determines the credit allocation of the Fund’s assets using ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs), such as S&P Global Ratings (S&P). For any security rated by an NRSRO other than S&P, the sub-adviser, OppenheimerFunds, Inc., converts that security’s rating to the equivalent S&P rating. If two or more NRSROs have assigned a rating to a security, the highest rating is used. For securities not rated by an NRSRO, the sub-adviser uses its own credit analysis to assign ratings in categories similar to those of S&P. The use of similar categories is not an indication that the sub-adviser’s credit analysis process is consistent or comparable with any NRSRO’s process were that NRSRO to rate the same security.
For the purposes of this Credit Allocation table, securities rated within the NRSROs’ four highest categories – AAA, AA, A, and BBB – are investment-grade securities. For further details, please consult the Fund’s prospectus or Statement of Additional Information.
For more current Fund holdings, please visit oppenheimerfunds.com.
|
4 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
Performance
DISTRIBUTION YIELDS
As of 1/31/19
| | | | |
| | Without Sales Charge | | With Sales Charge |
Class A | | 2.97% | | 2.83% |
Class C | | 2.49 | | N/A |
Class Y | | 3.14 | | N/A |
TAXABLE EQUIVALENT YIELDS
| | | | |
As of 1/31/19 |
Class A | | 3.45% | | |
Class C | | 2.41 | | |
Class Y | | 4.07 | | |
STANDARDIZED YIELDS
| | | | |
For the 30 Days Ended 1/31/19 |
Class A | | 1.85% | | |
Class C | | 1.29 | | |
Class Y | | 2.18 | | |
UNSUBSIDIZED STANDARDIZED YIELDS
| | | | |
For the 30 Days Ended 1/31/19 |
Class A | | 1.84% | | |
Class C | | 1.28 | | |
Class Y | | 2.17 | | |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS WITHOUT SALES CHARGE AS OF 1/31/19
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Inception Date | | 6-Month | | 1-Year | | 5-Year | | 10-Year | | Since Inception |
Class A (ONJAX) | | 3/1/94 | | 2.64% | | 13.89% | | 4.68% | | 7.46% | | 4.51% |
Class C (ONJCX) | | 8/29/95 | | 2.29 | | 13.13 | | 3.93 | | 6.66 | | 3.82 |
Class Y (ONJYX) | | 11/29/10 | | 2.76 | | 14.14 | | 4.87 | | N/A | | 4.42 |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS WITH SALES CHARGE AS OF 1/31/19
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Inception Date | | 6-Month | | 1-Year | | 5-Year | | 10-Year | | Since Inception |
Class A (ONJAX) | | 3/1/94 | | -2.24% | | 8.48% | | 3.67% | | 6.94% | | 4.31% |
Class C (ONJCX) | | 8/29/95 | | 1.29 | | 12.13 | | 3.93 | | 6.66 | | 3.82 |
Class Y (ONJYX) | | 11/29/10 | | 2.76 | | 14.14 | | 4.87 | | N/A | | 4.42 |
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results.The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized. Returns do not consider capital gains or income taxes on an individual’s investments. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). Fund returns include changes in share price, reinvested distributions, and the applicable sales charge: for Class A shares, the current maximum initial sales charge of 4.75% and for Class C, the contingent deferred sales charge of 1% for the 1-year period. There is no sales charge for Class Y shares.
The Fund’s performance is compared to the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Index, an index of a broad range of investment-grade municipal bonds that measures the performance of the general municipal bond market. The index is unmanaged and cannot be purchased directly by investors. While index comparisons may be useful to provide a benchmark for the Fund’s performance, it must be noted that the Fund’s investments are not limited to the investments comprising the index. Index performance includes reinvestment of
|
5 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
income, but does not reflect transaction costs, fees, expenses, or taxes. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only as a benchmark for the Fund’s performance, and does not predict or depict performance of the Fund. The Fund’s performance reflects the effects of the Fund’s business and operating expenses.
Distribution yields for Class A shares are based on dividends of $0.023 for the 22-day accrual period ended January 22, 2019. The yield without sales charge for Class A shares is calculated by dividing annualized dividends by the Class A net asset value (NAV) on January 22, 2019; for the yield with charge, the denominator is the Class A maximum offering price on that date. Distribution yields for Class C and Y are annualized based on dividends of $0.0193 and $0.0243, respectively, for the 22-day accrual period ended January 22, 2019 and on the corresponding net asset values on that date.
Standardized yield is based on an SEC-standardized formula designed to approximate the Fund’s annualized hypothetical current income from securities less expenses for the 30-day period ended January 31, 2019 and that date’s maximum offering price (for Class A shares) or net asset value (for all other share classes). Each result is compounded semiannually and annualized. Falling share prices artificially increase yields. The unsubsidized standardized yield is computed under an SEC-standardized formula based on net income earned for the 30-day period ended January 31, 2019. The calculation excludes any expense reimbursements and thus may result in a lower yield.
Taxable equivalent yield is based on the standardized yield and the 2018 top federal and New Jersey tax rate of 46.45%. Calculations factor in the 3.8% tax on unearned income under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as applicable. A portion of the Fund’s distributions may be subject to tax; distributions may also increase an investor’s exposure to the alternative minimum tax. Capital gains distributions are taxable as capital gains. Tax treatments of the Fund’s distributions and capital gains may vary by state; investors should consult a tax advisor to determine if the Fund is appropriate for them. Each result is compounded semiannually and annualized. Falling share prices artificially increase yields.This Report must be preceded or accompanied by a Fund prospectus.
Investments in “tobacco bonds,” which are backed by the proceeds a state or territory receives from the 1998 national litigation settlement with tobacco manufacturers, may be vulnerable to economic and/or legislative events that affect issuers in a particular municipal market sector. Annual payments by MSA-participating manufacturers, for example, hinge on many factors, including annual domestic cigarette shipments, inflation and the relative market share of non-participating manufacturers. To date, we believe consumption figures remain within an acceptable range of the assumptions used to structure MSA bonds. Future MSA payments could be reduced if consumption were to fall more rapidly than originally forecast.
The ICE BofA Merrill Lynch AAA Municipal Securities index is the AAA subset of the ICE BofA Merrill Lynch US Municipal Securities Index, which tracks the performance of dollar-denominated, investment-grade, tax-exempt debt issued by U.S. states and territories and their political subdivisions; index constituents are weighted based on capitalization, and accrued interest is calculated assuming next-day settlement.
Before investing in any of the Oppenheimer funds, investors should carefully consider a fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses contain this and other information about the funds, and may be obtained by asking your financial advisor, visiting
|
6 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
oppenheimerfunds.com, or calling 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). Read prospectuses and summary prospectuses carefully before investing.
Shares of Oppenheimer funds are not deposits or obligations of any bank, are not guaranteed by any bank, are not insured by the FDIC or any other agency, and involve investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested.
|
7 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
Fund Expenses
Fund Expenses. As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, which may include sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and/or contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service fees; and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The examples are based on an investment of $1,000.00 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire 6-month period ended January 31, 2019.
Actual Expenses. The first section of the table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section for the class of shares you hold, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expense that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000.00 (for example, an $8,600.00 account value divided by $1,000.00 = 8.60), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During 6 Months Ended January 31, 2019” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes.The second section of the table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio for each class of shares, and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year for each class before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example for the class of shares you hold with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as front-end or contingent deferred sales charges (loads). Therefore, the “hypothetical” section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
|
8 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | |
Actual | | Beginning Account Value August 1, 2018 | | Ending Account Value January 31, 2019 | | Expenses Paid During 6 Months Ended January 31, 2019 |
Class A | | $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,026.40 | | $ 7.12 |
Class C | | 1,000.00 | | 1,022.90 | | 10.45 |
Class Y | | 1,000.00 | | 1,027.60 | | 5.89 |
| | |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | | | | |
Class A | | 1,000.00 | | 1,018.20 | | 7.10 |
Class C | | 1,000.00 | | 1,014.92 | | 10.41 |
Class Y | | 1,000.00 | | 1,019.41 | | 5.87 |
Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio for that class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Those annualized expense ratios, excluding indirect expenses from affiliated funds, based on the 6-month period ended January 31, 2019 are as follows:
| | | | |
Class | | Expense Ratios | |
Class A | | | 1.39% | |
Class C | | | 2.04 | |
Class Y | | | 1.15 | |
|
9 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSJanuary 31, 2019 Unaudited
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes—112.4% | | | | | | | | | |
New Jersey—82.6% | | | | | | | | | |
$1,000,000 | | Atlantic City, NJ GO1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 03/01/2037 | | | $ | 1,112,880 | |
1,250,000 | | Atlantic City, NJ GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2042 | | | | 1,367,987 | |
1,000,000 | | Camden County, NJ Improvement Authority (Cooper Health System)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2033 | | | | 1,077,710 | |
1,000,000 | | Camden County, NJ Improvement Authority (Cooper Health System)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2034 | | | | 1,074,360 | |
1,000,000 | | Camden County, NJ Improvement Authority (Cooper Health System)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2035 | | | | 1,071,970 | |
2,000,000 | | Casino Reinvestment Devel. Authority of NJ1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2031 | | | | 2,186,260 | |
1,665,000 | | Casino Reinvestment Devel. Authority of NJ | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2024 | | | | 1,668,813 | |
3,000,000 | | Casino Reinvestment Devel. Authority of NJ1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 3,196,830 | |
3,000,000 | | Casino Reinvestment Devel. Authority of NJ1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2044 | | | | 3,192,060 | |
420,000 | | Casino Reinvestment Devel. Authority of NJ (Hotel Room Fee) | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2025 | | | | 420,844 | |
760,000 | | Casino Reinvestment Devel. Authority of NJ (Hotel Room Fee) | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2022 | | | | 761,862 | |
1,000,000 | | Casino Reinvestment Devel. Authority of NJ (Luxury Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2028 | | | | 1,104,170 | |
25,000 | | Essex County, NJ Improvement Authority1 | | | 4.750 | | | | 11/01/2032 | | | | 25,054 | |
130,000 | | Essex County, NJ Improvement Authority (Newark) | | | 5.125 | | | | 04/01/2029 | | | | 130,482 | |
250,000 | | Essex County, NJ Improvement Authority (Newark)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 11/01/2030 | | | | 260,425 | |
50,000 | | Essex County, NJ Utilities Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2020 | | | | 50,263 | |
140,000 | | Garden State Preservation Trust, NJ Open Space & Farmland Preservation | | | 3.565 | 2 | | | 11/01/2026 | | | | 114,100 | |
460,000 | | Garden State Preservation Trust, NJ Open Space & Farmland Preservation1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 11/01/2028 | | | | 557,276 | |
1,000,000 | | Hudson County, NJ Improvement Authority1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 01/01/2040 | | | | 1,036,450 | |
2,655,000 | | Hudson County, NJ Improvement Authority (Lincoln Park Golf Course)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 06/01/2041 | | | | 2,856,833 | |
20,000 | | Middlesex County, NJ Improvement Authority (South Plainfield Urban Renewal)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 09/01/2030 | | | | 20,060 | |
35,000 | | Monroe, NJ Municipal Utilities1 | | | 4.125 | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 35,063 | |
5,000 | | Neptune City, NJ Hsg. Authority1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 04/01/2019 | | | | 5,011 | |
445,000 | | New Brunswick, NJ Parking Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2027 | | | | 486,643 | |
605,000 | | New Brunswick, NJ Parking Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2029 | | | | 661,398 | |
1,000,000 | | New Brunswick, NJ Parking Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2047 | | | | 1,132,430 | |
3,000,000 | | Newark, NJ GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2029 | | | | 3,202,320 | |
430,000 | | Newark, NJ GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2029 | | | | 457,735 | |
1,000,000 | | Newark, NJ Hsg. Authority (Port Newark Marine Terminal Rental)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 1,031,710 | |
760,000 | | Newark, NJ Hsg. Authority (Port Newark Marine Terminal Rental)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 888,782 | |
600,000 | | NJ Building Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2028 | | | | 688,986 | |
300,000 | | NJ Building Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2029 | | | | 342,990 | |
2,095,000 | | NJ EDA1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2028 | | | | 2,228,745 | |
750,000 | | NJ EDA1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2029 | | | | 795,900 | |
|
10 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
New Jersey (Continued) | | | | | | | | | |
$3,000,000 | | NJ EDA1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 06/15/2035 | | | $ | 3,196,440 | |
3,000,000 | | NJ EDA1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2036 | | | | 3,186,000 | |
100,000 | | NJ EDA (Continental Airlines) | | | 5.250 | | | | 09/15/2029 | | | | 108,551 | |
2,000,000 | | NJ EDA (Continental Airlines) | | | 5.625 | | | | 11/15/2030 | | | | 2,257,020 | |
70,000 | | NJ EDA (Dept. of Human Services)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 70,200 | |
350,000 | | NJ EDA (Foundation Academy Charter School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 368,491 | |
1,000,000 | | NJ EDA (Foundation Academy Charter School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2050 | | | | 1,043,040 | |
525,000 | | NJ EDA (Golden Door Charter School) | | | 6.250 | | | | 11/01/2038 | | | | 558,815 | |
2,500,000 | | NJ EDA (Golden Door Charter School) | | | 6.500 | | | | 11/01/2052 | | | | 2,666,900 | |
2,655,000 | | NJ EDA (Harrogate) | | | 5.875 | | | | 12/01/2026 | | | | 2,617,989 | |
1,700,000 | | NJ EDA (Lions Gate) | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2044 | | | | 1,702,822 | |
1,000,000 | | NJ EDA (Marion P Thomas Charter School) | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2033 | | | | 983,620 | |
2,500,000 | | NJ EDA (Marion P Thomas Charter School) | | | 5.250 | | | | 10/01/2038 | | | | 2,428,200 | |
90,000 | | NJ EDA (Metromall Urban Renewal) | | | 6.500 | | | | 04/01/2031 | | | | 97,462 | |
3,000,000 | | NJ EDA (Motor Vehicle Surcharges)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 3,364,710 | |
160,000 | | NJ EDA (Municipal Rehabilitation)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2028 | | | | 160,342 | |
5,320,000 | | NJ EDA (New Jersey American Water Company)1 | | | 5.600 | | | | 11/01/2034 | | | | 5,518,170 | |
4,350,000 | | NJ EDA (New Jersey American Water Company)1 | | | 5.700 | | | | 10/01/2039 | | | | 4,441,046 | |
735,000 | | NJ EDA (Newark Downtown District Management Corp.)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/15/2027 | | | | 735,823 | |
1,400,000 | | NJ EDA (Newark Downtown District Management Corp.)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/15/2037 | | | | 1,401,134 | |
2,600,000 | | NJ EDA (Newark Downtown District Management Corp.)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/15/2037 | | | | 2,887,872 | |
1,000,000 | | NJ EDA (North Star Academy Charter School of Newark)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2047 | | | | 1,051,280 | |
500,000 | | NJ EDA (Provident Group-Kean Properties)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 531,850 | |
1,000,000 | | NJ EDA (Provident Group-Montclair Properties)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2042 | | | | 1,092,360 | |
1,000,000 | | NJ EDA (School Facilities)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 09/01/2026 | | | | 1,049,450 | |
65,000 | | NJ EDA (St. Barnabas Medical Center) | | | 6.827 | 2 | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 62,032 | |
25,000 | | NJ EDA (St. Barnabas Medical Center) | | | 7.147 | 2 | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 24,336 | |
3,000,000 | | NJ EDA (State Government Buildings)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2047 | | | | 3,133,020 | |
20,000 | | NJ EDA (State Office Buildings)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2020 | | | | 20,047 | |
3,000,000 | | NJ EDA (Team Academy Charter School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 3,144,600 | |
3,200,000 | | NJ EDA (Team Academy Charter School)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 10/01/2043 | | | | 3,483,520 | |
10,650,000 | | NJ EDA (The Goethals Bridge Replacement)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 01/01/2043 | | | | 11,453,543 | |
1,515,000 | | NJ EDA (UMM Energy Partners)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2037 | | | | 1,561,692 | |
1,250,000 | | NJ EDA (UMM Energy Partners)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/15/2043 | | | | 1,289,812 | |
275,000 | | NJ EDA (University Heights Charter School) | | | 5.375 | | | | 09/01/2033 | | | | 283,817 | |
765,000 | | NJ EDA (University Heights Charter School) | | | 5.625 | | | | 09/01/2038 | | | | 787,499 | |
1,590,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Georgian Court University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 1,672,362 | |
1,485,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Georgian Court University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,552,315 | |
1,640,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Georgian Court University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 1,710,815 | |
5,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Public Library)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2022 | | | | 5,014 | |
|
11 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
New Jersey (Continued) | | | | | | | | | |
$185,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Rider University)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 07/01/2035 | | | $ | 201,400 | |
300,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Rider University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 325,245 | |
1,000,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Rider University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,027,100 | |
3,250,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Rider University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 3,446,658 | |
2,000,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (William Patterson University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 2,221,440 | |
5,000,000 | | NJ GO3 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2027 | | | | 5,902,125 | |
5,000,000 | | NJ GO3 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2028 | | | | 5,827,688 | |
3,000,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (Barnabas Health)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2044 | | | | 3,249,090 | |
5,085,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (Catholic Health East)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2033 | | | | 5,360,454 | |
2,000,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (Hospital Asset Transformation)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2038 | | | | 2,123,620 | |
1,960,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (St. Luke’s Warren Hospital)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/15/2034 | | | | 2,119,701 | |
2,000,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (University Hospital) | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2046 | | | | 2,181,940 | |
125,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (Virtua Health/Virtua Memorial Hospital Burlington County Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 127,064 | |
1,425,000 | | NJ Higher Education Student Assistance Authority (Student Loans)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2025 | | | | 1,517,554 | |
40,000 | | NJ Higher Education Student Assistance Authority (Student Loans)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2029 | | | | 42,610 | |
870,000 | | NJ Hsg. & Mtg. Finance Agency1 | | | 3.950 | | | | 11/01/2043 | | | | 875,725 | |
1,000,000 | | NJ Hsg. & Mtg. Finance Agency (Single Family Hsg.)1 | | | 3.800 | | | | 10/01/2032 | | | | 1,011,750 | |
2,000,000 | | NJ Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2037 | | | | 2,208,360 | |
7,400,000 | | NJ Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 7,390,750 | |
3,350,000 | | NJ Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 3,547,248 | |
1,200,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority | | | 3.726 | 2 | | | 12/15/2028 | | | | 862,176 | |
2,000,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority | | | 4.298 | 2 | | | 12/15/2037 | | | | 914,760 | |
3,540,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2031 | | | | 3,918,249 | |
1,625,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2038 | | | | 1,679,730 | |
5,000,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 06/15/2041 | | | | 5,215,500 | |
4,518,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/15/2035 | | | | 4,832,362 | |
2,000,000 | | NJ Turnpike Authority1,4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2048 | | | | 2,267,020 | |
20,000 | | Passaic County, NJ Improvement Authority (Paterson Parking Deck)1 | | | 4.100 | | | | 04/15/2019 | | | | 20,020 | |
6,330,000 | | Rutgers State University NJ3 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2029 | | | | 7,045,025 | |
5,380,000 | | Rutgers State University NJ3 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2030 | | | | 5,969,796 | |
4,000,000 | | Rutgers State University NJ3 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 4,422,790 | |
1,350,000 | | South Jersey, NJ Port Corp. (Marine Terminal)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2039 | | | | 1,457,784 | |
3,650,000 | | South Jersey, NJ Transportation Authority | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 3,899,076 | |
25,000 | | Stratford, NJ School District | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2020 | | | | 25,271 | |
|
12 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
New Jersey (Continued) | | | | | | | | | |
$55,000 | | Union County, NJ Improvement Authority (Linden Airport) | | | 5.000 | % | | | 03/01/2028 | | | $ | 55,137 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 202,240,631 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New York—7.6% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2,229,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ (JFK International Air Terminal)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2022 | | | | 2,319,096 | |
8,720,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ (JFK International Air Terminal)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2025 | | | | 9,073,073 | |
5,100,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ (JFK International Air Terminal)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2028 | | | | 5,338,272 | |
810,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ (KIAC) | | | 6.750 | | | | 10/01/2019 | | | | 828,144 | |
850,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 206th Series1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2037 | | | | 962,795 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 18,521,380 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Possessions—22.2% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
10,000 | | Guam Hsg. Corp. (Single Family Mtg.) | | | 5.750 | | | | 09/01/2031 | | | | 10,140 | |
125,000 | | Guam Power Authority, Series A1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2024 | | | | 137,280 | |
250,000 | | Guam Power Authority, Series A1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2030 | | | | 272,827 | |
1,965,000 | | Northern Mariana Islands Ports Authority, Series A | | | 6.250 | | | | 03/15/2028 | | | | 1,853,329 | |
19,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 05/15/2043 | | | | 19,212,420 | |
2,150,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,217,437 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2040 | | | | 1,721,250 | |
168,097 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority5 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 108,633 | |
168,096 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority5 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 108,632 | |
165,099 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority5 | | | 10.000 | | | | 01/01/2021 | | | | 106,695 | |
165,099 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority5 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 106,695 | |
55,033 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority5 | | | 10.000 | | | | 01/01/2022 | | | | 35,565 | |
55,033 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority5 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 35,565 | |
45,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A5 | | | 5.050 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 28,069 | |
5,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 3,131,250 | |
550,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 344,437 | |
50,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 31,188 | |
90,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2025 | | | | 56,137 | |
45,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series SS, NPFGC | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 45,386 | |
100,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 62,375 | |
750,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, FGIC6 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 581,250 | |
575,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 86,250 | |
4,750,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 712,500 | |
2,610,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 391,500 | |
975,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure, AMBAC | | | 6.995 | 2 | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 389,434 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure, FGIC6 | | | 7.046 | 2 | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 651,690 | |
|
13 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
U.S. Possessions (Continued) | | | | | | | | | |
$400,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure (Mepsi Campus)5 | | | 6.500 | % | | | 10/01/2037 | | | $ | 81,000 | |
930,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University) | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2036 | | | | 870,713 | |
100,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University) | | | 5.125 | | | | 04/01/2032 | | | | 96,000 | |
100,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University) | | | 5.375 | | | | 04/01/2042 | | | | 94,875 | |
175,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Cogeneration Facilities) | | | 6.625 | | | | 06/01/2026 | | | | 170,844 | |
1,000,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Polytechnic University), ACA1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2032 | | | | 1,000,260 | |
2,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Municipal Finance Agency, Series A, AGC1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 08/01/2020 | | | | 2,037,700 | |
1,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, NPFGC1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 1,032,460 | |
5,235,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., Series B5 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/01/2026 | | | | 287,925 | |
2,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2021 | | | | 1,225,000 | |
4,925,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2042 | | | | 2,413,250 | |
16,675,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A, NPFGC | | | 5.807 | 2 | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 4,699,182 | |
325,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 6.375 | | | | 08/01/2039 | | | | 160,063 | |
9,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C5 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/01/2057 | | | | 7,447,500 | |
1,100,000 | | V.I. Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | 6.497 | 2 | | | 05/15/2035 | | | | 307,703 | |
3,100,000 | | V.I. Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | 7.622 | 2 | | | 05/15/2035 | | | | 788,268 | |
50,000 | | V.I. Water & Power Authority | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 48,163 | |
15,000 | | V.I. Water & Power Authority | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 14,285 | |
85,000 | | V.I. Water & Power Authority | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 80,521 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 54,293,646 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Investments, at Value (Cost $284,833,873)—112.4% | | | | | | | | | | | 275,055,657 | |
Net Other Assets (Liabilities)—(12.4) | | | | | | | | | | | (30,244,362 | ) |
Net Assets—100.0% | | | | | | | | | | $ | 244,811,295 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Footnotes to Statement of Investments
1. All or a portion of the security position has been segregated for collateral to cover borrowings. See Note 9 of the accompanying Notes.
2. Zero coupon bond reflects effective yield on the original acquisition date.
3. Security represents the underlying municipal bond with respect to an inverse floating rate security held by the Fund. The bond was purchased by the Fund and subsequently transferred to a trust, which issued the related inverse floating rate security. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
4. All or a portion of the security position is when-issued or delayed delivery to be delivered and settled after period end. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
5. This security is not accruing income because its issuer has missed or is expected to miss interest and/or principal payments. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
6. The issuer of this security has missed or is expected to miss interest and/or principal payments on this security. The security is insured and is accruing partial income at a rate anticipated to be recovered through the insurer. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate.
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below:
| | |
ACA | | American Capital Access |
AGC | | Assured Guaranty Corp. |
|
14 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below: (Continued)
| | |
AMBAC | | AMBAC Indemnity Corp. |
EDA | | Economic Devel. Authority |
FGIC | | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. |
GO | | General Obligation |
ITEMECF | | Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Community Facilities |
JFK | | John Fitzgerald Kennedy |
NPFGC | | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
NY/NJ | | New York/New Jersey |
TASC | | Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds |
V.I. | | United States Virgin Islands |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
15 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIESJanuary 31, 2019 Unaudited
| | |
Assets | | |
Investments, at value (cost $284,833,873)—see accompanying statement of investments | | $ 275,055,657 |
|
|
Cash | | 508,594 |
|
|
Receivables and other assets: | | |
Interest | | 2,284,425 |
Shares of beneficial interest sold | | 31,812 |
Investments sold on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis | | 10,000 |
Other | | 72,194 |
| | |
Total assets | | 277,962,682 |
| | |
Liabilities | | |
Payables and other liabilities: | | |
Payable for short-term floating rate notes issued (See Note 4) | | 19,280,000 |
Payable for borrowings (See Note 9) | | 11,200,000 |
Investments purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis | | 2,233,140 |
Dividends | | 184,672 |
Shares of beneficial interest redeemed | | 81,327 |
Trustees’ compensation | | 58,962 |
Distribution and service plan fees | | 41,282 |
Interest expense on borrowings | | 22,481 |
Shareholder communications | | 4,648 |
Other | | 44,875 |
| | |
Total liabilities | | 33,151,387 |
| | |
|
Net Assets | | $ 244,811,295 |
| | |
| | |
|
Composition of Net Assets | | |
Paid-in capital | | $ 401,132,431 |
|
|
Total accumulated loss | | (156,321,136) |
| | |
Net Assets | | $ 244,811,295 |
| | |
| | |
|
Net Asset Value Per Share | | |
Class A Shares: | | |
Net asset value and redemption price per share (based on net assets of $153,120,777 and 16,471,495 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ 9.30 |
Maximum offering price per share (net asset value plus sales charge of 4.75% of offering price) | | $ 9.76 |
|
|
| |
Class C Shares: | | |
Net asset value, redemption price (excludes applicable contingent deferred sales charge) and offering price per share (based on net assets of $69,349,069 and 7,450,118 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ 9.31 |
|
|
| |
Class Y Shares: | | |
Net asset value, redemption price and offering price per share (based on net assets of $22,341,449 and 2,400,258 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ 9.31 |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
16 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONSFor the Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 Unaudited
| | | | |
Investment Income | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 5,483,765 | |
Expenses | | | | |
Management fees | | | 751,873 | |
|
| |
Distribution and service plan fees: | | | | |
Class A | | | 194,148 | |
Class C | | | 317,875 | |
|
| |
Transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees: | | | | |
Class A | | | 79,816 | |
Class C | | | 35,340 | |
Class Y | | | 12,383 | |
|
| |
Shareholder communications: | | | | |
Class A | | | 7,413 | |
Class C | | | 3,880 | |
Class Y | | | 1,616 | |
|
| |
Interest expense and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued (See Note 4) | | | 203,884 | |
|
| |
Borrowing fees | | | 177,383 | |
|
| |
Interest expense on borrowings | | | 92,864 | |
|
| |
Trustees’ compensation | | | 1,891 | |
|
| |
Custodian fees and expenses | | | 951 | |
|
| |
Other | | | 89,639 | |
| | | | |
Total expenses | | | 1,970,956 | |
Net Investment Income | | | 3,512,809 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized loss on investment transactions | | | (11,651,925) | |
|
| |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investment transactions | | | 14,404,663 | |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | | $ | 6,265,547 | |
| | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
17 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETSUnaudited
| | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 (Unaudited) | | | Year Ended July 31, 20181 |
Operations | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 3,512,809 | | | $8,858,975 |
|
|
Net realized loss | | | (11,651,925) | | | (17,751,789) |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | 14,404,663 | | | 17,551,210 |
| | | |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | | | 6,265,547 | | | 8,658,396 |
| | | | | | |
Dividends and/or Distributions to Shareholders | | | | | | |
Dividends and distributions declared: | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (2,234,334) | | | (5,547,022) |
Class B2 | | | — | | | (20,939) |
Class C | | | (756,728) | | | (2,065,669) |
Class Y | | | (375,328) | | | (914,187) |
| | | |
Total dividends and distributions declared | | | (3,366,390) | | | (8,547,817) |
| | | | | | |
Beneficial Interest Transactions | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from beneficial interest transactions: | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (11,685,357) | | | (45,576,678) |
Class B2 | | | — | | | (1,609,917) |
Class C | | | (2,859,009) | | | (26,229,722) |
Class Y | | | 143,249 | | | (14,241,261) |
| | | |
Total beneficial interest transactions | | | (14,401,117) | | | (87,657,578) |
| | | | | | |
Net Assets | | | | | | |
Total decrease | | | (11,501,960) | | | (87,546,999) |
|
|
Beginning of period | | | 256,313,255 | | | 343,860,254 |
| | | |
End of period | | $ | 244,811,295 | | | $ 256,313,255 |
| | | |
1. Prior period amounts have been conformed to current year presentation. See Notes to Financial Statements, Note 2 – New Accounting Pronouncements for further details.
2. Effective June 1, 2018 all Class B shares converted to Class A shares.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
18 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT
OF CASH FLOWSFor Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 Unaudited
| | | | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 6,265,547 | |
|
| |
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | |
Purchase of investment securities | | | (28,368,567) | |
Proceeds from disposition of investment securities | | | 36,951,629 | |
Short-term investment securities, net | | | 7,983 | |
Premium amortization | | | 902,779 | |
Discount accretion | | | (239,163) | |
Net realized loss on investment transactions | | | 11,651,925 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investment transactions | | | (14,404,663) | |
Change in assets: | | | | |
Decrease in other assets | | | 64,028 | |
Increase in interest receivable | | | (77,745) | |
Decrease in receivable for securities sold | | | 2,069,742 | |
Change in liabilities: | | | | |
Increase in other liabilities | | | 2,910 | |
Increase in payable for securities purchased | | | 2,233,140 | |
| | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 17,059,545 | |
| | | | |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | | | | |
Proceeds from borrowings | | | 36,400,000 | |
Payments on borrowings | | | (34,800,000) | |
Proceeds from shares sold | | | 15,573,863 | |
Payments on shares redeemed | | | (33,518,149) | |
Cash distributions paid | | | (433,875) | |
| | | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (16,778,161) | |
|
| |
Net increase in cash | | | 281,384 | |
|
| |
Cash, beginning balance | | | 227,210 | |
| | | | |
Cash, ending balance | | $ | 508,594 | |
| | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of reinvestment of dividends and distributions of $2,857,314.
Cash paid for interest on borrowings—$74,564.
Cash paid for interest on short-term floating rate notes issued— $203,884.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
19 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 (Unaudited) | | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 |
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $9.19 | | | | $9.02 | | | | $9.70 | | | | $9.34 | | | | $9.67 | | | $9.60 |
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.14 | | | | 0.29 | | | | 0.38 | | | | 0.43 | | | | 0.48 | | | 0.52 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.10 | | | | 0.16 | | | | (0.66) | | | | 0.40 | | | | (0.31) | | | 0.07 |
| | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.24 | | | | 0.45 | | | | (0.28) | | | | 0.83 | | | | 0.17 | | | 0.59 |
|
|
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.13) | | | | (0.28) | | | | (0.40) | | | | (0.47) | | | | (0.50) | | | (0.52) |
|
|
Net asset value, end of period | | | $9.30 | | | | $9.19 | | | | $9.02 | | | | $9.70 | | | | $9.34 | | | $9.67 |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 2.64% | | | | 5.22% | | | | (3.01)% | | | | 9.25% | | | | 1.64% | | | 6.40% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $153,121 | | | | $162,955 | | | | $207,958 | | | | $257,608 | | | | $263,873 | | | $306,172 |
|
|
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $158,255 | | | | $170,793 | | | | $231,289 | | | | $260,521 | | | | $301,779 | | | $326,496 |
|
|
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 2.91% | | | | 3.36% | | | | 4.05% | | | | 4.55% | | | | 4.89% | | | 5.58% |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 1.02% | | | | 1.07% | | | | 0.90% | | | | 0.87% | | | | 0.87% | | | 0.83% |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.21% | | | | 0.19% | | | | 0.13% | | | | 0.22% | | | | 0.23% | | | 0.15% |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.16% | | | | 0.04% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.04% | | | | 0.07% | | | 0.08% |
| | | |
Total expenses | | | 1.39% | | | | 1.30% | | | | 1.09% | | | | 1.13% | | | | 1.17% | | | 1.06% |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 1.39% | | | | 1.30% | | | | 1.09% | | | | 1.13% | | | | 1.17% | | | 1.06%5 |
|
|
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 10% | | | | 23% | | | | 9% | | | | 11% | | | | 7% | | | 30% |
|
20 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
5. Waiver was less than 0.005%.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
21 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTSContinued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C | | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 (Unaudited) | | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 |
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $9.20 | | | | $9.04 | | | | $9.71 | | | | $9.35 | | | | $9.68 | | | $9.61 |
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.11 | | | | 0.24 | | | | 0.31 | | | | 0.36 | | | | 0.40 | | | 0.45 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.10 | | | | 0.15 | | | | (0.64) | | | | 0.40 | | | | (0.30) | | | 0.06 |
| | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.21 | | | | 0.39 | | | | (0.33) | | | | 0.76 | | | | 0.10 | | | 0.51 |
|
|
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.10) | | | | (0.23) | | | | (0.34) | | | | (0.40) | | | | (0.43) | | | (0.44) |
|
|
Net asset value, end of period | | | $9.31 | | | | $9.20 | | | | $9.04 | | | | $9.71 | | | | $9.35 | | | $9.68 |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 2.29% | | | | 4.41% | | | | (3.70)% | | | | 8.54% | | | | 0.87% | | | 5.60% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $69,349 | | | | $71,388 | | | | $97,517 | | | | $124,488 | | | | $131,468 | | | $142,154 |
|
|
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $70,090 | | | | $79,705 | | | | $112,466 | | | | $125,656 | | | | $142,243 | | | $150,721 |
|
|
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 2.26% | | | | 2.70% | | | | 3.36% | | | | 3.80% | | | | 4.06% | | | 4.83% |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 1.67% | | | | 1.73% | | | | 1.62% | | | | 1.61% | | | | 1.62% | | | 1.59% |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.21% | | | | 0.19% | | | | 0.13% | | | | 0.22% | | | | 0.23% | | | 0.15% |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.16% | | | | 0.04% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.04% | | | | 0.07% | | | 0.08% |
| | | |
Total expenses | | | 2.04% | | | | 1.96% | | | | 1.81% | | | | 1.87% | | | | 1.92% | | | 1.82% |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 2.04% | | | | 1.96% | | | | 1.81% | | | | 1.87% | | | | 1.92% | | | 1.82%5 |
|
|
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 10% | | | | 23% | | | | 9% | | | | 11% | | | | 7% | | | 30% |
|
22 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
5. Waiver was less than 0.005%.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
23 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTSContinued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class Y | | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 (Unaudited) | | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 |
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $9.20 | | | | $9.04 | | | | $9.71 | | | | $9.35 | | | | $9.68 | | | $9.60 |
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.15 | | | | 0.32 | | | | 0.38 | | | | 0.44 | | | | 0.49 | | | 0.54 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.10 | | | | 0.14 | | | | (0.63) | | | | 0.40 | | | | (0.30) | | | 0.07 |
| | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.25 | | | | 0.46 | | | | (0.25) | | | | 0.84 | | | | 0.19 | | | 0.61 |
|
|
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.14) | | | | (0.30) | | | | (0.42) | | | | (0.48) | | | | (0.52) | | | (0.53) |
|
|
Net asset value, end of period | | | $9.31 | | | | $9.20 | | | | $9.04 | | | | $9.71 | | | | $9.35 | | | $9.68 |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 2.76% | | | | 5.35% | | | | (2.83)% | | | | 9.51% | | | | 1.79% | | | 6.66% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $22,341 | | | | $21,970 | | | | $36,708 | | | | $28,817 | | | | $23,579 | | | $23,842 |
|
|
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $24,579 | | | | $26,034 | | | | $32,570 | | | | $23,906 | | | | $25,005 | | | $20,998 |
|
|
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.15% | | | | 3.61% | | | | 4.10% | | | | 4.66% | | | | 5.02% | | | 5.71% |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 0.78% | | | | 0.83% | | | | 0.73% | | | | 0.71% | | | | 0.72% | | | 0.69% |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.21% | | | | 0.19% | | | | 0.13% | | | | 0.22% | | | | 0.23% | | | 0.15% |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.16% | | | | 0.04% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.04% | | | | 0.07% | | | 0.08% |
| | | |
Total expenses | | | 1.15% | | | | 1.06% | | | | 0.92% | | | | 0.97% | | | | 1.02% | | | 0.92% |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 1.15% | | | | 1.06% | | | | 0.92% | | | | 0.97% | | | | 1.02% | | | 0.92%5 |
|
|
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 10% | | | | 23% | | | | 9% | | | | 11% | | | | 7% | | | 30% |
|
24 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
5. Waiver was less than 0.005%.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
25 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSJanuary 31, 2019 Unaudited
1. Organization
Oppenheimer Rochester New Jersey Municipal Fund (the “Fund”) is a separate series of Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust, a non-diversified, open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”), as amended. The Fund’s investment objective is to seek tax-free income. The Fund’s investment adviser is OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (“OFI Global” or the “Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of OFI (“OFI” or the “Sub-Adviser”). The Manager has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with OFI.
The Fund offers Class A, Class C and Class Y shares, and previously offered Class B shares for new purchase through June 29, 2012. Subsequent to that date, no new purchases of Class B shares were permitted. Reinvestment of dividend and/or capital gain distributions and exchanges of Class B shares into and from other Oppenheimer funds were permitted through May 31, 2018. Effective June 1, 2018 (the “Conversion Date”), all Class B shares converted to Class A shares. Class A shares are sold at their offering price, which is normally net asset value plus a front-end sales charge. Class C shares are sold, and Class B shares were sold, without a front-end sales charge but may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”). Class Y shares are sold to certain institutional investors or intermediaries without either a front-end sales charge or a CDSC, however, the intermediaries may impose charges on their accountholders who beneficially own Class Y shares. All classes of shares have identical rights and voting privileges with respect to the Fund in general and exclusive voting rights on matters that affect that class alone. Earnings, net assets and net asset value per share may differ due to each class having its own expenses, such as transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees and shareholder communications, directly attributable to that class. Class A and C shares have, and Class B shares had, separate distribution and/or service plans under which they pay, and Class B shares paid, fees. Class Y shares do not pay such fees. Previously issued Class B shares automatically converted to Class A shares 72 months after the date of purchase.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed in the Fund’s preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Security Valuation.All investments in securities are recorded at their estimated fair value, as described in Note 3.
Allocation of Income, Expenses, Gains and Losses.Income, expenses (other than those attributable to a specific class), gains and losses are allocated on a daily basis to each class of shares based upon the relative proportion of net assets represented by such class. Operating expenses directly attributable to a specific class are charged against the operations of that class.
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders. Dividends and distributions to
|
26 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
shareholders, which are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. GAAP, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income distributions, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly. Capital gain distributions, if any, are declared and paid annually or at other times as determined necessary by the Manager.
The tax character of distributions is determined as of the Fund’s fiscal year end. Therefore, a portion of the Fund’s distributions made to shareholders prior to the Fund’s fiscal year end may ultimately be categorized as a tax return of capital.
Investment Income.Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. Discount and premium, which are included in interest income on the Statement of Operations, are amortized or accreted daily.
Custodian Fees. “Custodian fees and expenses” in the Statement of Operations may include interest expense incurred by the Fund on any cash overdrafts of its custodian account during the period. Such cash overdrafts may result from the effects of failed trades in portfolio securities and from cash outflows resulting from unanticipated shareholder redemption activity. The Fund pays interest to its custodian on such cash overdraft at a rate equal to the Prime Rate plus 0.35%. The “Reduction to custodian expenses” line item, if applicable, represents earnings on cash balances maintained by the Fund during the period. Such interest expense and other custodian fees may be paid with these earnings.
Security Transactions. Security transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses on securities sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
Indemnifications.The Fund’s organizational documents provide current and former Trustees and officers with a limited indemnification against liabilities arising in connection with the performance of their duties to the Fund. In the normal course of business, the Fund may also enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would be dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
Federal Taxes.The Fund intends to comply with provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its investment company taxable income to shareholders. Therefore, no federal income or excise tax provision is required. The Fund files income tax returns in U.S. federal and applicable state jurisdictions. The statute of limitations on the Fund’s tax return filings generally remains open for the three preceding fiscal reporting period ends. The Fund has analyzed its tax positions for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018, including open tax years, and does not believe there are any uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Fund’s financial statements.
During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018, the Fund did not utilize any capital loss carryforwards to offset capital gains realized in that fiscal year. Capital loss carryforwards with no expiration, if any, must be utilized prior to those with expiration dates. Capital losses with
|
27 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
no expiration will be carried forward to future years if not offset by gains.
At period end, it is estimated that the capital loss carryforwards would be $148,324,284, which will not expire. The estimated capital loss carryforward represents the carryforward as of the end of the last fiscal year, increased or decreased by capital losses or gains realized in the first six months of the current fiscal year. During the reporting period, it is estimated that the Fund will not utilize any capital loss carryforward to offset realized capital gains.
Net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) may differ for financial statement and tax purposes. The character of dividends and distributions made during the fiscal year from net investment income or net realized gains are determined in accordance with federal income tax requirements, which may differ from the character of net investment income or net realized gains presented in those financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Also, due to timing of dividends and distributions, the fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the fiscal year in which the income or net realized gain was recorded by the Fund.
The aggregate cost of securities and other investments and the composition of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of securities and other investments for federal income tax purposes at period end are noted in the following table. The primary difference between book and tax appreciation or depreciation of securities and other investments, if applicable, is attributable to the tax deferral of losses or tax realization of financial statement unrealized gain or loss.
| | | | |
Federal tax cost of securities | | $ | 264,941,7691 | |
| | | | |
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 11,434,795 | |
| |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (21,217,261) | |
| | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (9,782,466) | |
| | | | |
1.The Federal tax cost of securities does not include cost of $19,896,354, which has otherwise been recognized for financial reporting purposes, related to bonds placed into trusts in conjunction with certain investment transactions. See the Inverse Floating Rate Securities note in Note 4.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncements. In March 2017, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”), ASU 2017-08. This provides guidance related to the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Manager has evaluated the impacts of these changes on the financial statements and there are no material impacts.
During August 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued Final
|
28 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Rule ReleaseNo. 33-10532 (the “Rule”), Disclosure Update and Simplification. The rule amends certain financial statement disclosure requirements to conform to U.S. GAAP. The amendments to Rule6-04.17 of RegulationS-X (balance sheet) remove the requirement to separately state the book basis components of net assets: undistributed (over-distribution of) net investment income (“UNII”), accumulated undistributed net realized gains (losses), and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) at the balance sheet date. Instead, consistent with U.S. GAAP, funds will be required to disclose total distributable earnings. The amendments to Rule6-09 of RegulationS-X (statement of changes in net assets) remove the requirement to separately state the sources of distributions paid. Instead, consistent with U.S. GAAP, funds will be required to disclose the total amount of distributions paid, except that any tax return of capital must be separately disclosed. The amendments also remove the requirement to parenthetically state the book basis amount of UNII on the statement of changes in net assets. The requirements of the Rule were effective November 5, 2018, and the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the current reporting period have been modified accordingly. In addition, certain amounts within the Fund’s Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the prior fiscal period have been modified to conform to the Rule.
3. Securities Valuation
The Fund calculates the net asset value of its shares as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern Time, on each day the New York Stock Exchange (the “Exchange” or “NYSE”) is open for trading, except in the case of a scheduled early closing of the Exchange, in which case the Fund will calculate net asset value of the shares as of the scheduled early closing time of the Exchange.
The Fund’s Board has adopted procedures for the valuation of the Fund’s securities and has delegated theday-to-day responsibility for valuation determinations under those procedures to the Manager. The Manager has established a Valuation Committee which is responsible for determining a fair valuation for any security for which market quotations are not readily available. The Valuation Committee’s fair valuation determinations are subject to review, approval and ratification by the Fund’s Board at least quarterly or more frequently, if necessary.
Valuation Methods and Inputs
Securities are valued primarily using unadjusted quoted market prices, when available, as supplied by third party pricing services or broker-dealers.
The following methodologies are used to determine the market value or the fair value of the types of securities described below:
Corporate and government debt securities (of U.S. or foreign issuers) and municipal debt securities, short-term notes, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, and asset-backed securities are valued at the mean between the bid and asked prices utilizing evaluated prices obtained from third party pricing services or broker-dealers who may use matrix pricing methods to determine the evaluated prices. Pricing services generally price debt securities assuming orderly transactions of an institutional “round lot” size, but some trades
|
29 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
may occur in smaller, “odd lot” sizes, sometimes at lower prices than institutional round lot trades. Standard inputs generally considered by third-party pricing vendors include reported trade data, broker-dealer price quotations, benchmark yields, issuer spreads on comparable securities, the credit quality, yield, maturity, as well as other appropriate factors.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or when a significant event has occurred that would materially affect the value of the security, are fair valued either (i) by a standardized fair valuation methodology applicable to the security type or the significant event as previously approved by the Valuation Committee and the Fund’s Board or (ii) as determined in good faith by the Manager’s Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee considers all relevant facts that are reasonably available, through either public information or information available to the Manager, when determining the fair value of a security. Those standardized fair valuation methodologies include, but are not limited to, valuing securities at the last sale price or initially at cost and subsequently adjusting the value based on: changes in company specific fundamentals, changes in an appropriate securities index, or changes in the value of similar securities which may be further adjusted for any discounts related to security-specific resale restrictions. When possible, such methodologies use observable market inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices of similar securities, observable interest rates, currency rates and yield curves. The methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities nor can it be assured that the Fund can obtain the fair value assigned to a security if it were to sell the security.
Classifications
Each investment asset or liability of the Fund is assigned a level at measurement date based on the significance and source of the inputs to its valuation. Various data inputs may be used in determining the value of each of the Fund’s investments as of the reporting period end.
These data inputs are categorized in the following hierarchy under applicable financial accounting standards:
1) Level1-unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (including securities actively traded on a securities exchange)
2) Level2-inputs other than unadjusted quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and market corroborated inputs such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.)
3) Level3-significant unobservable inputs (including the Manager’s own judgments about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability).
The inputs used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities.
The table below categorizes amounts that are included in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities at period end based on valuation input level:
|
30 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1— Unadjusted Quoted Prices | | | Level 2— Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | Level 3— Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | Value | |
| |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Jersey | | $ | — | | | $ | 202,240,631 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 202,240,631 | |
New York | | | — | | | | 18,521,380 | | | | — | | | | 18,521,380 | |
U.S. Possessions | | | — | | | | 54,293,646 | | | | — | | | | 54,293,646 | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | — | | | $ | 275,055,657 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 275,055,657 | |
| | | | |
Forward currency exchange contracts and futures contracts, if any, are reported at their unrealized appreciation/depreciation at measurement date, which represents the change in the contract’s value from trade date. All additional assets and liabilities included in the above table are reported at their market value at measurement date.
For the reporting period, there were no transfers between levels.
4. Investments and Risks
Inverse Floating Rate Securities.The Fund invests in inverse floating rate securities that pay interest at a rate that varies inversely with short-term interest rates. Because inverse floating rate securities are leveraged instruments, the value of an inverse floating rate security will change more significantly in response to changes in interest rates and other market fluctuations than the market value of a conventional fixed-rate municipal security of similar maturity and credit quality, including the municipal bond underlying an inverse floating rate security.
An inverse floating rate security is created as part of a financial transaction referred to as a “tender option bond” transaction. In most cases, in a tender option bond transaction the Fund sells a fixed-rate municipal bond (the “underlying municipal bond”) to a trust (the “Trust”). The Trust then issues and sells short-term floating rate securities with a fixed principal amount representing a senior interest in the underlying municipal bond to third parties and a residual, subordinate interest in the underlying municipal bond (referred to as an “inverse floating rate security”) to the Fund. The interest rate on the short-term floating rate securities resets periodically, usually weekly, to a prevailing market rate and holders of these securities are granted the option to tender their securities back to the Trust for repurchase at their principal amount plus accrued interest thereon (the “purchase price”) periodically, usually daily or weekly. A remarketing agent for the Trust is required to attempt tore-sell any tendered short-term floating rate securities to new investors for the purchase price. If the remarketing agent is unable to successfullyre-sell the tendered short-term floating rate securities, a liquidity provider to the Trust must contribute cash to the Trust to ensure that the tendering holders receive the purchase price of their securities on the repurchase date.
Because holders of the short-term floating rate securities are granted the right to tender their securities to the Trust for repurchase at frequent intervals for the purchase price, with
|
31 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
such payment effectively guaranteed by the liquidity provider, the securities generally bear short-term rates of interest commensurate with money market instruments. When interest is paid on the underlying municipal bond to the Trust, such proceeds are first used to pay the Trust’s administrative expenses and accrued interest to holders of the short-term floating rate securities, with any remaining amounts being paid to the Fund, as the holder of the inverse floating rate security. Accordingly, the amount of such interest on the underlying municipal bond paid to the Fund is inversely related to the rate of interest on the short-term floating rate securities. Additionally, because the principal amount of the short-term floating rate securities is fixed and is not adjusted in response to changes in the market value of the underlying municipal bond, any change in the market value of the underlying municipal bond is reflected entirely in a change to the value of the inverse floating rate security.
Typically, the terms of an inverse floating rate security grant certain rights to the Fund, as holder. For example, the Fund typically has the right upon request to require that the Trust compel a tender of the short-term floating rate securities to facilitate the Fund’s acquisition of the underlying municipal bond. Following such a request, the Fund pays the Trust the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities and a specified portion of any market value gain on the underlying municipal bond since its deposit into the Trust, which the Trust uses to redeem the short-term floating rate securities. The Trust then distributes the underlying municipal bond to the Fund. Through the exercise of this right, the Fund can voluntarily terminate or “collapse” the Trust, terminate its investment in the related inverse floating rate security and obtain the underlying municipal bond. Additionally, the Fund also typically has the right to exchange with the Trust (i) a principal amount of short-term floating rate securities held by the Fund for a corresponding additional principal amount of the inverse floating rate security or (ii) a principal amount of the inverse floating rate security held by the Fund for a corresponding additional principal amount of short-term floating rate securities (which are typically then sold to other investors). Through the exercise of this right, the Fund may increase (or decrease) the principal amount of short-term floating rate securities outstanding, thereby increasing (or decreasing) the amount of leverage provided by the short-term floating rate securities to the Fund’s investment exposure to the underlying municipal bond.
The Fund’s investments in inverse floating rate securities involve certain risks. As short-term interest rates rise, an inverse floating rate security produces less current income (and, in extreme cases, may pay no income) and as short-term interest rates fall, an inverse floating rate security produces more current income. Thus, if short-term interest rates rise after the issuance of the inverse floating rate security, any yield advantage is reduced or eliminated. All inverse floating rate securities entail some degree of leverage represented by the outstanding principal amount of the related short-term floating rate securities, relative to the par value of the underlying municipal bond. The value of, and income earned on, an inverse floating rate security that has a higher degree of leverage will fluctuate more significantly in response to changes in interest rates and to changes in the market value of the related underlying municipal bond than that of an inverse floating rate security with a lower degree of leverage, and is more likely to be eliminated entirely under adverse market conditions. Changes in the value of an inverse floating rate security will also be more significant than changes in the
|
32 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
market value of the related underlying municipal bond because the leverage provided by the related short-term floating rate securities increases the sensitivity of an inverse floating rate security to changes in interest rates and to the market value of the underlying municipal bond. An inverse floating rate security can be expected to underperform fixed-rate municipal bonds when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates is decreasing (or is already small) or when long-term interest rates are rising, but can be expected to outperform fixed-rate municipal bonds when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates is increasing (or is already large) or when long-term interest rates are falling. Additionally, a tender option bond transaction typically provides for the automatic termination or “collapse” of a Trust upon the occurrence of certain adverse events, usually referred to as “mandatory tender events” or “tender option termination events.” These events may include, among others, a credit ratings downgrade of the underlying municipal bond below a specified level, a decrease in the market value of the underlying municipal bond below a specified amount, a bankruptcy of the liquidity provider or the inability of the remarketing agent to resell to new investors short-term floating rate securities that have been tendered for repurchase by holders thereof. Following the occurrence of such an event, the underlying municipal bond is generally sold for current market value and the proceeds distributed to holders of the short-term floating rate securities and inverse floating rate security, with the holder of the inverse floating rate security (the Fund) generally receiving the proceeds of such sale only after the holders of the short-term floating rate securities have received proceeds equal to the purchase price of their securities (and the liquidity provider is generally required to contribute cash to the Trust only in an amount sufficient to ensure that the holders of the short-term floating rate securities receive the purchase price of their securities in connection with such termination of the Trust). Following the occurrence of such events, the Fund could potentially lose the entire amount of its investment in the inverse floating rate security.
Finally, the Fund may enter into shortfall/reimbursement agreements with the liquidity provider of certain tender option bond transactions in connection with certain inverse floating rate securities held by the Fund. These agreements commit the Fund to reimburse the liquidity provider to the extent that the liquidity provider must provide cash to a Trust, including following the termination of a Trust resulting from the occurrence of a “mandatory tender event.” In connection with the occurrence of such an event and the termination of the Trust triggered thereby, the shortfall/reimbursement agreement will make the Fund liable for the amount of the negative difference, if any, between the liquidation value of the underlying municipal bond and the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities issued by the
Trust. Under the standard terms of a tender option bond transaction, absent such a shortfall/ reimbursement agreement, the Fund, as holder of the inverse floating rate security, would not be required to make such a reimbursement payment to the liquidity provider. The Manager monitors the Fund’s potential exposure with respect to these agreements on a daily basis and intends to take action to terminate the Fund’s investment in related inverse floating rate securities, if it deems it appropriate to do so.
When the Fund creates an inverse floating rate security in a tender option bond transaction by selling an underlying municipal bond to a Trust, the transaction is considered a secured
|
33 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
borrowing for financial reporting purposes. As a result of such accounting treatment, the Fund includes the underlying municipal bond on its Statement of Investments and as an asset on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities (but does not separately include the related inverse floating rate security on either). The Fund also includes a liability on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities equal to the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest on the related short-term floating rate securities issued by the Trust. Interest on the underlying municipal bond is recorded as investment income on the Fund’s Statement of Operations, while interest payable on the related short-term floating rate securities is recorded as interest expense. At period end, municipal bond holdings with a value of $29,167,424 shown on the Fund’s Statement of Investments are held by such Trusts and serve as the underlying municipal bonds for the related $19,280,000 in short-term floating rate securities issued and outstanding at that date.
At period end, the inverse floating rate securities associated with tender option bond transactions accounted for as secured borrowings were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | Inverse Floater1 | | Coupon Rate2 | | Maturity Date | | | Value | |
| |
$ 1,250,000 | | NJ GO Tender Option Bond Series2017-XF0553-1 Trust | | | 10.560 | % | | | 6/1/27 | | | $ | 2,152,125 | |
1,250,000 | | NJ GO Tender Option Bond Series2017-XF0553-2 Trust | | | 10.560 | | | | 6/1/28 | | | | 2,077,688 | |
1,585,000 | | Rutgers State University NJ Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2105 Trust | | | 11.105 | | | | 5/1/29 | | | | 2,300,025 | |
1,345,000 | | Rutgers State University NJ Tender Option Bond Series2015-XF2105-2 Trust | | | 11.120 | | | | 5/1/30 | | | | 1,934,796 | |
1,000,000 | | Rutgers State University NJ Tender Option Bond Series2015-XF2105-3 Trust | | | 11.120 | | | | 5/1/38 | | | | 1,422,790 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 9,887,424 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1.For a list of abbreviations used in the Inverse Floater table see the Portfolio Abbreviations table at the end of the Statement of Investments.
2.Represents the current interest rate for the inverse floating rate security.
The Fund may also purchase an inverse floating rate security created as part of a tender option bond transaction not initiated by the Fund when a third party, such as a municipal issuer or financial institution, transfers an underlying municipal bond to a Trust. For financial reporting purposes, the Fund includes the inverse floating rate security related to such transaction on its Statement of Investments and as an asset on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities, and interest on the security is recorded as investment income on the Fund’s Statement of Operations.
The Fund may invest in inverse floating rate securities with any degree of leverage (as measured by the outstanding principal amount of related short-term floating rate securities). However, the Fund may only expose up to 20% of its total assets to the effects of leverage from its investments in inverse floating rate securities. This limitation is measured by comparing the aggregate principal amount of the short-term floating rate securities that are related to the inverse floating rate securities held by the Fund to the total assets of the Fund.
|
34 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
The Fund’s exposure to the effects of leverage from its investments in inverse floating rate securities amounts to $19,280,000 or 6.94% of its total assets at period end.
Securities on a When-Issued or Delayed Delivery Basis.The Fund may purchase securities on a “when-issued” basis, and may purchase or sell securities on a “delayed delivery” basis. “When-issued” or “delayed delivery” refers to securities whose terms and indenture are available and for which a market exists, but which are not available for immediate delivery. Delivery and payment for securities that have been purchased by the Fund on a when-issued basis normally takes place within six months and possibly as long as two years or more after the trade date. During this period, such securities do not earn interest, are subject to market fluctuation and may increase or decrease in value prior to their delivery. The purchase of securities on a when-issued basis may increase the volatility of the Fund’s net asset value to the extent the Fund executes such transactions while remaining substantially fully invested. When the Fund engages in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions, it relies on the buyer or seller, as the case may be, to complete the transaction. Their failure to do so may cause the Fund to lose the opportunity to obtain or dispose of the security at a price and yield it considers advantageous. The Fund may also sell securities that it purchased on a when-issued basis or forward commitment prior to settlement of the original purchase.
At period end, the Fund had purchased securities issued on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis and sold securities issued on a delayed delivery basis as follows:
| | | | |
| | When-Issued or Delayed Delivery Basis Transactions | |
Purchased securities | | | $ 2,233,140 | |
Sold securities | | | 10,000 | |
Credit Risk.The Fund invests in high-yield,non-investment-grade bonds, which may be subject to a greater degree of credit risk. Credit risk relates to the ability of the issuer to meet interest or principal payments or both as they become due. The Fund may acquire securities that have missed an interest payment, and is not obligated to dispose of securities whose issuers or underlying obligors subsequently miss an interest and/or principal payment.
In June 2016, Congress passed the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”). PROMESA established a federally-appointed fiscal oversight board (the “Oversight Board”) to oversee Puerto Rico’s financial operations and allows the Oversight Board to file cases on behalf of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or one of its instrumentalities to restructure debt and other obligations of the relevant entity in a “Title III” proceeding. Title III incorporates many provisions of the federal Bankruptcy Code for U.S. territories, and incorporates legal mechanisms for a litigation stay and restructuring of pension and debt obligations, among other provisions. In early May 2017, Title III petitions were filed for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”), two of the largest issuers of Puerto Rico debt. Title III petitions for Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority (“PRHTA”) and Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority
|
35 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
(“PREPA”) were subsequently filed inmid-May and early July, respectively. Title III petitions for additional Puerto Rican instrumentalities may be filed. These restructuring proceedings create uncertainty as to the treatment of claims of varying degrees of seniority and the levels and priorities of payment from the affected entities.
Information concerning securities not accruing interest at period end is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Cost | | $ | 36,617,727 | | | | | |
Market Value | | $ | 19,898,916 | | | | | |
Market Value as % of Net Assets | | | 8.13% | | | | | |
Concentration Risk.The Fund invests a large percentage of its total assets in obligations of issuers within its respective state and U.S. territories. Risks may arise from geographic concentration in any state, commonwealth or territory, such as Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam or the Northern Mariana Islands. Certain economic, regulatory or political developments occurring in the state, commonwealth or territory such as ongoing developments in Puerto Rico may impair the ability of certain issuers of municipal securities to pay principal and interest on their obligations.
5. Market Risk Factors
The Fund’s investments in securities and/or financial derivatives may expose the Fund to various market risk factors:
Commodity Risk. Commodity risk relates to the change in value of commodities or commodity indexes as they relate to increases or decreases in the commodities market. Commodities are physical assets that have tangible properties. Examples of these types of assets are crude oil, heating oil, metals, livestock, and agricultural products.
Credit Risk.Credit risk relates to the ability of the issuer of debt to meet interest and principal payments, or both, as they come due. In general, lower-grade, higher-yield debt securities are subject to credit risk to a greater extent than lower-yield, higher-quality securities.
Equity Risk. Equity risk relates to the change in value of equity securities as they relate to increases or decreases in the general market.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk. Foreign exchange rate risk relates to the change in the U.S. dollar value of a security held that is denominated in a foreign currency. The U.S. dollar value of a foreign currency denominated security will decrease as the dollar appreciates against the currency, while the U.S. dollar value will increase as the dollar depreciates against the currency.
Interest Rate Risk.Interest rate risk refers to the fluctuations in value of fixed-income securities resulting from the inverse relationship between price and yield. For example, an increase in general interest rates will tend to reduce the market value of already issued fixed-income investments, and a decline in general interest rates will tend to increase their value. In addition, debt securities with longer maturities, which tend to have higher yields, are subject to potentially greater fluctuations in value from changes in interest rates than
|
36 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
5. Market Risk Factors (Continued)
obligations with shorter maturities.
Volatility Risk.Volatility risk refers to the magnitude of the movement, but not the direction of the movement, in a financial instrument’s price over a defined time period. Large increases or decreases in a financial instrument’s price over a relative time period typically indicate greater volatility risk, while small increases or decreases in its price typically indicate lower volatility risk.
6. Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund has authorized an unlimited number of no par value shares of beneficial interest of each class. Transactions in shares of beneficial interest were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Class A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold1 | | | 581,806 | | | $ | 5,386,613 | | | | 1,247,452 | | | $ | 10,931,851 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 196,948 | | | | 1,828,748 | | | | 544,997 | | | | 4,746,712 | |
Redeemed | | | (2,039,417) | | | | (18,900,718) | | | | (7,103,366) | | | | (61,255,241) | |
Net decrease | | | (1,260,663) | | | $ | (11,685,357) | | | | (5,310,917) | | | $ | (45,576,678) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,409 | | | | 20,887 | |
Redeemed1 | | | — | | | | — | | | | (187,602) | | | | (1,630,804) | |
Net decrease | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | (185,193) | | | $ | (1,609,917) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | 308,514 | | | $ | 2,859,929 | | | | 403,037 | | | $ | 3,471,733 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 72,386 | | | | 673,170 | | | | 216,093 | | | | 1,882,421 | |
Redeemed | | | (688,825) | | | | (6,392,108) | | | | (3,652,882) | | | | (31,583,876) | |
Net decrease | | | (307,925) | | | $ | (2,859,009) | | | | (3,033,752) | | | $ | (26,229,722) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class Y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | 772,861 | | | $ | 7,199,257 | | | | 808,666 | | | $ | 7,129,287 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 38,242 | | | | 355,396 | | | | 97,328 | | | | 848,879 | |
Redeemed | | | (798,706) | | | | (7,411,404) | | | | (2,581,033) | | | | (22,219,427) | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | 12,397 | | | $ | 143,249 | | | | (1,675,039) | | | $ | (14,241,261) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. All outstanding Class B shares converted to Class A shares on June 1, 2018.
7. Purchases and Sales of Securities
The aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities, other than short-term obligations, for the reporting period were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Purchases | | | Sales | |
Investment securities | | $ | 28,368,567 | | | $ | 36,951,629 | |
|
37 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Management Fees.Under the investment advisory agreement, the Fund pays the Manager a management fee based on the daily net assets of the Fund at an annual rate as shown in the following table:
| | | | |
Fee Schedule | | | |
Up to $200 million | | | 0.60% | |
Next $100 million | | | 0.55 | |
Next $200 million | | | 0.50 | |
Next $250 million | | | 0.45 | |
Next $250 million | | | 0.40 | |
Over $1 billion | | | 0.35 | |
The Fund’s effective management fee for the reporting period was 0.59% of average annual net assets before any applicable waivers.
Sub-Adviser Fees.The Manager has retained theSub-Adviser to provide theday-to-day portfolio management of the Fund. Under theSub-Advisory Agreement, the Manager pays theSub-Adviser an annual fee in monthly installments, equal to a percentage of the investment management fee collected by the Manager from the Fund, which shall be calculated after any investment management fee waivers. The fee paid to theSub-Adviser is paid by the Manager, not by the Fund.
Transfer Agent Fees.OFI Global (the “Transfer Agent”) serves as the transfer and shareholder servicing agent for the Fund. The Fund pays the Transfer Agent a fee based on annual net assets, which shall be calculated after any applicable fee waivers. Fees incurred and average net assets for each class with respect to these services are detailed in the Statement of Operations and Financial Highlights, respectively.
Sub-Transfer Agent Fees.The Transfer Agent has retained Shareholder Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of OFI (the“Sub-Transfer Agent”), to provide theday-to-day transfer agent and shareholder servicing of the Fund. Under theSub-Transfer Agency Agreement, the Transfer Agent pays theSub-Transfer Agent an annual fee in monthly installments, equal to a percentage of the transfer agent fee collected by the Transfer Agent from the Fund, which shall be calculated after any applicable fee waivers. The fee paid to theSub-Transfer Agent is paid by the Transfer Agent, not by the Fund.
Trustees’ Compensation.The Fund has adopted an unfunded retirement plan (the “Plan”) for the Fund’s Independent Trustees. Benefits are based on years of service and fees paid to each Trustee during their period of service. The Plan was frozen with respect to adding new participants effective December 31, 2006 (the “Freeze Date”) and existing Plan Participants as of the Freeze Date will continue to receive accrued benefits under the Plan. Active
Independent Trustees as of the Freeze Date have each elected a distribution method with respect to their benefits under the Plan.
|
38 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)
During the reporting period, the Fund’s projected benefit obligations, payments to retired
Trustees and accumulated liability were as follows:
| | | | |
Projected Benefit Obligations Increased | | $ | — | |
Payments Made to Retired Trustees | | | 3,347 | |
Accumulated Liability as of January 31, 2019 | | | 24,416 | |
The Fund’s Board of Trustees (“Board”) has adopted a compensation deferral plan for Independent Trustees that enables Trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from the Fund. For purposes of determining the amount owed to the Trustee under the plan, deferred amounts are treated as though equal dollar amounts had been invested in shares of the Fund or in other Oppenheimer funds selected by the Trustee. The Fund purchases shares of the funds selected for deferral by the Trustee in amounts equal to his or her deemed investment, resulting in a Fund asset equal to the deferred compensation liability. Such assets are included as a component of “Other” within the asset section of the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Deferral of Trustees’ fees under the plan will not affect the net assets of the Fund and will not materially affect the Fund’s assets, liabilities or net investment income per share. Amounts will be deferred until distributed in accordance with the compensation deferral plan.
Distribution and Service Plan(12b-1) Fees.Under its General Distributor’s Agreement with the Fund, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (the “Distributor”) acts as the Fund’s principal underwriter in the continuous public offering of the Fund’s classes of shares.
Service Plan for Class A Shares. The Fund has adopted a Service Plan (the “Plan”) for Class A shares pursuant to Rule12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the Plan, the Fund reimburses the Distributor for a portion of its costs incurred for services provided to accounts that hold Class A shares. Reimbursement is made periodically at an annual rate of up to
0.25% of the daily net assets of Class A shares of the Fund. The Distributor currently uses all of those fees to pay dealers, brokers, banks and other financial institutions periodically for providing personal service and maintenance of accounts of their customers that hold Class A shares. Any unreimbursed expenses the Distributor incurs with respect to Class A shares in any fiscal year cannot be recovered in subsequent periods. Fees incurred by the Fund under the Plan are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Distribution and Service Plan for Class C Shares.The Fund has adopted a Distribution and Service Plan (the “Plan”) for Class C shares pursuant to Rule12b-1 under the 1940 Act to compensate the Distributor for distributing those share classes, maintaining accounts and providing shareholder services. Under the Plan, the Fund pays the Distributor an annual asset-based sales charge of 0.75% on Class C shares’ daily net assets. The Fund also pays a service fee under the Plan at an annual rate of 0.15% of daily net assets. The Plan continues in effect from year to year only if the Fund’s Board of Trustees votes annually to approve their continuance at an in person meeting called for that purpose. Fees incurred by the Fund
|
39 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)
under the Plan are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Sales Charges.Front-end sales charges and CDSC do not represent expenses of the Fund. They are deducted from the proceeds of sales of Fund shares prior to investment or from redemption proceeds prior to remittance, as applicable. The sales charges retained by the Distributor from the sale of shares and the CDSC retained by the Distributor on the redemption of shares is shown in the following table for the period indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | Class A Front-End Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | | | Class A Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | | | Class C Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | |
January 31, 2019 | | $ | 8,753 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 209 | |
9. Borrowings and Other Financing
Borrowings.The Fund can borrow money from banks in amounts up to one third of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less all liabilities and indebtedness other than borrowings (meaning that the value of those assets must be at least 300% of the amount borrowed). The Fund can use those borrowings for investment-related purposes such as purchasing portfolio securities. The Fund also may borrow to meet redemption obligations or for temporary and emergency purposes. When the Fund invests borrowed money in portfolio securities, it is using a speculative investment technique known as leverage and changes in the value of the Fund’s investments will have a larger effect on its share price than if it did not borrow because of the effect of leverage.
The Fund can also use the borrowings for other investment-related purposes, including in connection with the Fund’s inverse floater investments as discussed in Note 4. The Fund may use the borrowings to reduce the leverage amount of, or unwind or “collapse” trusts that issued “inverse floaters” owned by the Fund, or in circumstances in which the Fund has entered into a shortfall and forbearance agreement with the sponsor of the inverse floater trust to meet the Fund’s obligation to reimburse the sponsor of the inverse floater for the difference between the liquidation value of the underlying bond and the amount due to holders of the short-term floating rate notes issued by the Trust. See the discussion in Note 4
(Inverse Floating Rate Securities) for additional information.
The Fund will pay interest and may pay other fees in connection with loans. If the Fund does borrow, it will be subject to greater expenses than funds that do not borrow. The interest on borrowed money and the other fees incurred in conjunction with loans are an expense that might reduce the Fund’s yield and return. Expenses incurred by the Fund with respect to interest on borrowings and commitment fees are disclosed separately or as other expenses on the Statement of Operations.
The Fund entered into a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “Agreement”) with conduit lenders and Citibank N.A. which enables it to participate with certain other
|
40 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
9. Borrowings and Other Financing (Continued)
Oppenheimer funds in a committed, secured borrowing facility that permits borrowings of up to $2.5 billion, collectively, by the Oppenheimer Rochester Funds. To secure the loan, the Fund pledges investment securities in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Securities held in collateralized accounts to cover these borrowings are noted in the Statement of Investments. Interest is charged to the Fund, based on its borrowings, at current commercial paper issuance rates (2.6263% at period end). The Fund pays additional fees monthly to its lender on its outstanding borrowings to manage and administer the facility and is allocated itspro-rata share of an annual structuring fee and ongoing commitment fees both of which are based on the total facility size. Total fees and interest that are included in expenses on the Fund’s Statement of Operations related to its participation in the borrowing facility during the reporting period equal 0.18% of the Fund’s average net assets on an annualized basis. The Fund has the right to prepay such loans and terminate its participation in the conduit loan facility at any time upon prior notice.
At period end, the Fund had borrowings outstanding at an interest rate of 2.6263%.
Details of the borrowings for the reporting period are as follows:
| | | | |
Average Daily Loan Balance | | $ | 7,607,609 | |
Average Daily Interest Rate | | | 2.359 | % |
Fees Paid | | $ | 52,001 | |
Interest Paid | | $ | 74,564 | |
Reverse Repurchase Agreements.The Fund may engage in reverse repurchase agreements. A reverse repurchase agreement is the sale of one or more securities to a counterparty at an agreed-upon purchase price with the simultaneous agreement to repurchase those securities on a future date at a higher repurchase price. The repurchase price represents the repayment of the purchase price and interest accrued thereon over the term of the repurchase agreement. The cash received by the Fund in connection with a reverse repurchase agreement may be used for investment-related purposes such as purchasing portfolio securities or for other purposes such as those described in the preceding “Borrowings” note.
The Fund entered into a Committed Repurchase Transaction Facility (the “Facility”) with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (the “counterparty”) which enables it to participate with certain other Oppenheimer funds in a committed reverse repurchase agreement facility that permits aggregate outstanding reverse repurchase agreements of up to $750 million, collectively. Interest is charged to the Fund on the purchase price of outstanding reverse repurchase agreements at current LIBOR rates plus an applicable spread. The Fund is also allocated itspro-rata share of an annual structuring fee based on the total Facility size and ongoing commitment fees based on the total unused amount of the Facility. The Fund retains the economic exposure to fluctuations in the value of securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements under the Facility and therefore these transactions are considered secured borrowings for financial reporting purposes. The Fund also continues to receive the economic benefit of interest payments received on securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements, in the form of a direct payment from the counterparty. These payments are included in
|
41 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
9. Borrowings and Other Financing (Continued)
interest income on the Statement of Operations. Total fees and interest related to the Fund’s participation in the Facility during the reporting period are included in expenses on the Fund’s Statement of Operations and equal 0.03% of the Fund’s average net assets on an annualized basis.
The securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements under the Facility are valued on a daily basis. To the extent this value, after adjusting for certain margin requirements of the Facility, exceeds the cash proceeds received, the Fund may request the counterparty to return securities equal in margin value to this excess. To the extent that the cash proceeds received exceed the margin value of the securities subject to the transaction, the counterparty may request additional securities from the Fund. The Fund has the right to declare each Wednesday as the repurchase date for any outstanding reverse repurchase agreement upon delivery of advanced notification and may also recall any security subject to such a transaction by substituting eligible securities of equal or greater margin value according to the Facility’s terms.
The Fund executed no transactions under the Facility during the reporting period.
Details of reverse repurchase agreement transactions for the reporting period are as follows:
10. Pending Acquisition
On October 18, 2018, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, an indirect corporate parent of theSub-Adviser and the Manager, announced that it has entered into an agreement whereby Invesco Ltd. (“Invesco”), a global investment management company, will acquire theSub-Adviser (the “Transaction”). In connection with the Transaction, on January 11, 2019, the Fund’s Board unanimously approved an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “Agreement”), which provides for the transfer of the assets and liabilities of the Fund to a corresponding, newly formed fund (the “Acquiring Fund”) in the Invesco family of funds (the “Reorganization”) in exchange for shares of the corresponding Acquiring Fund of equal value to the value of the shares of the Fund as of the close of business on the closing date. Although the Acquiring Fund will be managed by Invesco Advisers, Inc., the Acquiring Fund will, as of the closing date, have the same investment objective and substantially similar principal investment strategies and risks as the Fund. After the Reorganization, Invesco Advisers, Inc. will be the investment adviser to the Acquiring Fund, and the Fund will be liquidated and dissolved under applicable law and terminate its registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The Reorganization is expected to be atax-free reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The Reorganization is subject to the approval of shareholders of the Fund. Shareholders of record of the Fund on January 14, 2019 will be entitled to vote on the Reorganization and will receive a combined prospectus and proxy statement describing the Reorganization, the shareholder meeting, and a discussion of the factors the Fund’s Board considered in approving the Agreement. The combined prospectus and proxy statement is expected to be distributed to shareholders of record on or about February 28, 2019. The anticipated date of the shareholder
|
42 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
10. Pending Acquisition (Continued)
meeting is on or about April 12, 2019.
If shareholders approve the Agreement and certain other closing conditions are satisfied or waived, the Reorganization is expected to close during the second quarter of 2019, or as soon as practicable thereafter. This is subject to change.
11. Subsequent Event
On February 4, 2019, the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico confirmed the Third Amended Title III Plan of Adjustment of Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”). As a result, during February 2019 the Fund received a combination of newly issued COFINA bonds and cash in exchange for legacy COFINA bonds. The resulting impact to the Fund’s net assets was less than 0.50%.
|
43 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
BOARD APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY
ANDSUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTSUnaudited
The Fund has entered into an investment advisory agreement with OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (“OFI Global” or the “Adviser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (“OFI” or the“Sub-Adviser”) (“OFI Global” and “OFI” together the “Managers”) and OFI Global has entered into asub-advisory agreement with OFI whereby OFI provides investmentsub-advisory services to the Fund (collectively, the “Agreements”). Each year, the Board of Trustees (the “Board”), including a majority of the independent Trustees, is required to determine whether to approve the terms of the Agreements and the renewal thereof. The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, requires that the Board request and evaluate, and that the Managers provide, such information as may be reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the Agreements. The Board employs an independent consultant to prepare a report that provides information, including comparative information that the Board requests for that purpose. In addition toin-person meetings focused on this evaluation, the Board receives information throughout the year regarding Fund services, fees, expenses and performance.
The Managers and the independent consultant provided information to the Board on the following factors: (i) the nature, quality and extent of the Managers’ services, (ii) the comparative investment performance of the Fund and the Managers, (iii) the fees and expenses of the Fund, including comparative fee and expense information, (iv) the profitability of the Managers and their affiliates, including an analysis of the cost of providing services, (v) whether economies of scale are realized as the Fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for Fund investors and (vi) other benefits to the Managers from their relationship with the Fund. The Board was aware that there are alternatives to retaining the Managers.
Outlined below is a summary of the principal information considered by the Board as well as the Board’s conclusions.
Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The Board considered information about the nature, quality and extent of the services provided to the Fund and information regarding the Managers’ key personnel who provide such services. The Managers’ duties include providing the Fund with the services of theSub-Adviser’s portfolio manager and investment team, who provide research, analysis and other advisory services in regard to the Fund’s investments; and securities trading services. OFI Global is responsible for oversight of third-party service providers; monitoring compliance with applicable Fund policies and procedures and adherence to the Fund’s investment restrictions; risk management; and oversight of theSub-Adviser. OFI Global is also responsible for providing certain administrative services to the Fund. Those services include providing and supervising all administrative and clerical personnel who are necessary in order to provide effective corporate administration for the Fund; compiling and maintaining records with respect to the Fund’s operations; preparing and filing reports required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; preparing periodic reports regarding the operations of the Fund for its shareholders; preparing proxy materials for shareholder meetings; and preparing the registration statements required by federal and state securities laws for the sale of the Fund’s shares. OFI Global also provides the Fund with office space, facilities and equipment.
|
44 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
The Board also considered the quality of the services provided and the quality of the Managers’ resources that are available to the Fund. The Board took account of the fact that theSub-Adviser has over fifty years of experience as an investment adviser and that its assets under management rank it among the top mutual fund managers in the United States. The Board evaluated the Managers’ advisory, administrative, accounting, legal, compliance and risk management services, among other services, and information the Board has received regarding the experience and professional qualifications of the Managers’ key personnel and the size and functions of their staff. In its evaluation of the quality of the portfolio management services provided, the Board considered the experience of Elizabeth Mossow, the portfolio manager for the Fund, and theSub-Adviser’s investment team and analysts. The Board members also considered the totality of their experiences with the Managers as directors or trustees of the Fund and other funds advised by the Managers. The Board considered information regarding the quality of services provided by affiliates of the Managers, which the Board members have become knowledgeable about through their experiences with the Managers and in connection with the review or renewal of the Fund’s service agreements or service providers. The Board concluded, in light of the Managers’ experience, reputation, personnel, operations and resources that the Fund benefits from the services provided under the Agreements.
Investment Performance of the Managers and the Fund. Throughout the year, the Managers provided information on the investment performance of the Fund, the Adviser and theSub-Adviser, including comparative performance information. The Board also reviewed information, prepared by the Managers and by the independent consultant, comparing the Fund’s historical performance to relevant benchmarks or market indices and to the performance of other retail funds in the muni New Jersey category. The Board noted that the Fund’sone-year, three-year, five-year andten-year performance was below its category median.
Fees and Expenses of the Fund. The Board reviewed the fees paid to the Adviser and the other expenses borne by the Fund. The Board noted that the Adviser, not the Fund, pays theSub-Adviser’s fee under thesub-advisory agreement. The independent consultant provided comparative data in regard to the fees and expenses of the Fund and other retailfront-end load muni New Jersey category funds with comparable asset levels and distribution features. The Board noted that the Fund’s contractual management fee and total expenses were higher than its peer group and category median.
Economies of Scale and Profits Realized by the Managers. The Board considered information regarding the Managers’ costs in serving as the Fund’s investment adviser andsub-adviser, including the costs associated with the personnel and systems necessary to manage the Fund, and information regarding the Managers’ profitability from their relationship with the Fund. The Board also considered that the Managers must be able to pay and retain experienced professional personnel at competitive rates to provide quality services to the Fund. The Board reviewed whether the Managers may realize economies of scale in managing and supporting the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund currently has management fee breakpoints, which are intended to share with Fund shareholders economies of scale that may exist as the Fund’s assets grow.
|
45 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
BOARD APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY
ANDSUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
Other Benefits to the Managers. In addition to considering the profits realized by the Managers, the Board considered information that was provided regarding the direct and indirect benefits the Managers receive as a result of their relationship with the Fund, including compensation paid to the Managers’ affiliates.
Conclusions. These factors were also considered by the independent Trustees meeting separately from the full Board, assisted by experienced counsel to the Fund and to the independent Trustees. Fund counsel and the independent Trustees’ counsel are independent of the Managers within the meaning and intent of the Securities and Exchange Commission Rules.
Based on its review of the information it received and its evaluations described above, the Board, including a majority of the independent Trustees, decided to continue the Agreements through September 30, 2019. In arriving at its decision, the Board did not identify any factor or factors as being more important than others, but considered all of the above information, and considered the terms and conditions of the Agreements, including the management fees, in light of all the surrounding circumstances.
|
46 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
PORTFOLIO PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND GUIDELINES;
UPDATES TO STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited
The Fund has adopted Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Guidelines under which the Fund votes proxies relating to securities (“portfolio proxies”) held by the Fund. A description of the Fund’s Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Guidelines is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund toll-free at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677), (ii) on the Fund’s website at www.oppenheimerfunds.com, and (iii) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the Fund is required to file FormN-PX, with its complete proxy voting record for the 12 months ended June 30th, no later than August 31st of each year. The Fund’s voting record is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund toll-free at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677), and (ii) in the FormN-PX filing on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first quarter and the third quarter of each fiscal year on FormN-Q. The Fund’s FormN-Q filings are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Beginning in April 2019, the Fund will no longer file FormN-Qs and will instead disclose its portfolio holdings monthly on FormN-PORT, which will also be available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Householding—Delivery of Shareholder Documents
This is to inform you about OppenheimerFunds’ “householding” policy. If more than one member of your household maintains an account in a particular fund, OppenheimerFunds will mail only one copy of the fund’s prospectus (or, if available, the fund’s summary prospectus), annual and semiannual report and privacy policy. The consolidation of these mailings, called householding, benefits your fund through reduced mailing expense, and benefits you by reducing the volume of mail you receive from OppenheimerFunds. Householding does not affect the delivery of your account statements.
Please note that we will continue to household these mailings for as long as you remain an OppenheimerFunds shareholder, unless you request otherwise. If you prefer to receive multiple copies of these materials, please call us at1.800.CALL-OPP(225-5677).You may also notify us in writing or via email. We will begin sending you individual copies of the prospectus (or, if available, the summary prospectus), reports and privacy policy within 30 days of receiving your request to stop householding.
|
47 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
DISTRIBUTION SOURCESUnaudited
For any distribution that took place over the last six months of the Fund’s reporting period, the table below details on aper-share basis the percentage of the Fund’s total distribution payment amount that was derived from the following sources: net income, net profit from the sale of securities, and other capital sources. Other capital sources represent a return of capital. A return of capital may occur, for example, when some or all of the money that you invested in the Fund is paid back to you. A return of capital distribution does not necessarily reflect the Fund’s investment performance and should not be confused with “yield” or “income.” You should not draw any conclusions about the Fund’s investment performance from the amounts of these distributions. This information is based upon income and capital gains using generally accepted accounting principles as of the date of each distribution. If the Fund (or an underlying fund in which the Fund invests) invests in real estate investment trusts (REITs) and/or master limited partnerships (MLPs), the percentages attributed to each category are estimated using historical information because the character of the amounts received from the REITs and/or MLPs in which the Fund (or underlying fund) invests is unknown until after the end of the calendar year. Because the Fund is actively managed, the relative amount of the Fund’s total distributions derived from various sources over the calendar year may change. Please note that this information should not be used for tax reporting purposes as the tax character of distributable income may differ from the amounts used for this notification. You will receive IRS tax forms in the first quarter of each calendar year detailing the actual amount of the taxable andnon-taxable portion of distributions paid to you during the tax year.
For the most current information, please go to oppenheimerfunds.com. Select your Fund, and scroll down to the ‘Dividends’ table under ‘Analytics’.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fund Name | | Pay Date | | | Net Income | | | Net Profit from Sale | | | Other Capital Sources | |
Oppenheimer Rochester New Jersey Municipal Fund | | | 10/23/18 | | | | 98.6% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 1.4% | |
Oppenheimer Rochester New Jersey Municipal Fund | | | 1/22/18 | | | | 78.7% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 21.3% | |
|
48 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND
| | |
Trustees and Officers | | Joel W. Motley, Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Trustee |
| | Beth Ann Brown, Trustee |
| | Edmund P. Giambastiani, Jr., Trustee |
| | Elizabeth Krentzman, Trustee |
| | Mary F. Miller, Trustee |
| | Joanne Pace, Trustee |
| | Daniel Vandivort, Trustee |
| | Brian F. Wruble, Trustee |
| | Arthur P. Steinmetz, Trustee, President and Principal Executive Officer |
| | Scott S. Cottier, Vice President |
| | Troy E. Willis, Vice President |
| | Mark R. DeMitry, Vice President |
| | Michael L. Camarella, Vice President |
| | Charles S. Pulire, Vice President |
| | Elizabeth Mossow, Vice President |
| | Richard Stein, Vice President |
| | Cynthia Lo Bessette, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer |
| | Jennifer Foxson, Vice President and Chief Business Officer |
| | Mary Ann Picciotto, Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Anti-Money |
| | Laundering Officer |
| | Brian S. Petersen, Treasurer and Principal Financial & Accounting Officer |
| |
Manager | | OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. |
| |
Sub-Adviser | | OppenheimerFunds, Inc. |
| |
Distributor | | OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. |
| |
Transfer and Shareholder Servicing Agent | | OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. |
| |
Sub-Transfer Agent | | Shareholder Services, Inc. |
| | DBA OppenheimerFunds Services |
| |
Independent Registered | | KPMG LLP |
Public Accounting Firm | | |
| |
| | |
| | The financial statements included herein have been taken from the records of the Fund without examination of those records by the independent registered public accounting firm. |
© 2019 OppenheimerFunds, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
49 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
PRIVACY NOTICE
As an Oppenheimer fund shareholder, you are entitled to know how we protect your personal information and how we limit its disclosure.
Information Sources
We obtainnon-public personal information about our shareholders from the following sources:
● | | Applications or other forms. |
● | | When you create a user ID and password for online account access. |
● | | When you enroll in eDocs Direct,SMour electronic document delivery service. |
● | | Your transactions with us, our affiliates or others. |
● | | Technologies on our website, including: “cookies” and web beacons, which are used to collect data on the pages you visit and the features you use. |
If you visit oppenheimerfunds.com and do not log on to the secure account information areas, we do not obtain any personal information about you. When you do log on to a secure area, we do obtain your user ID and password to identify you. We also use this information to provide you with products and services you have requested, to inform you about products and services that you may be interested in and assist you in other ways.
We do not collect personal information through our website unless you willingly provide it to us, either directly by email or in those areas of the website that request information. In order to update your personal information (including your mailing address, email address and phone number) you must first log on and visit your user profile.
If you have set your browser to warn you before accepting cookies, you will receive the warning message with each cookie. You can refuse cookies by turning them off in your browser. However, doing so may limit your access to certain sections of our website.
We use cookies to help us improve and manage our website. For example, cookies help us recognize new versus repeat visitors to the site, track the pages visited, and enable some special features on the website. This data helps us provide better service for our website visitors.
Protection of Information
We do not disclose anynon-public personal information (such as names on a customer list) about current or former customers to anyone, except as permitted by law.
Disclosure of Information
Copies of confirmations, account statements and other documents reporting activity in your fund accounts are made available to your financial advisor (as designated by you). We may also use details about you and your investments to help us, our financial service affiliates, or firms that jointly market their financial products and services with ours, to better serve your investment needs or suggest educational material that may be of interest to you. If this requires us to provide you with an opportunity to “opt in” or “opt out” of such information sharing with a firm not affiliated with us, you will receive notification on how to do so, before any such sharing takes place.
Right of Refusal
We will not disclose your personal information to unaffiliated third parties (except as permitted by law), unless we first offer you a reasonable opportunity to refuse or “opt out” of such disclosure.
|
50 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
Internet Security and Encryption
In general, the email services provided by our website are encrypted and provide a secure and private means of communication with us. To protect your own privacy, confidential and/ or personal information should only be communicated via email when you are advised that you are using a secure website.
As a security measure, we do not include personal or account information innon-secure emails, and we advise you not to send such information to us innon-secure emails. Instead, you may take advantage of the secure features of our website to encrypt your email correspondence. To do this, you will need to use a browser that supports Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol.
● | | All transactions conducted via our websites, including redemptions, exchanges and purchases, are secured by the highest encryption standards available. SSL is used to establish a secure connection between your PC and OppenheimerFunds’ server. It transmits information in an encrypted and scrambled format. |
● | | Encryption is achieved through an electronic scrambling technology that uses a “key” to code and then decode the data. Encryption acts like the cable converter box you may have on your television set. It scrambles data with a secret code so that no one can make sense of it while it is being transmitted. When the data reaches its destination, the same software unscrambles the data. |
● | | You can exit the secure area by closing your browser or, for added security, you can use the Log Out button before you close your browser. |
Other Security Measures
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your personal account information. Our employees and agents have access to that information only so that they may offer you products or provide services, for example, when responding to your account questions.
How You Can Help
You can also do your part to keep your account information private and to prevent unauthorized transactions. If you obtain a user ID and password for your account, safeguard that information. Strengthening your online credentials–your online security profile–typically your user name, password, and security questions and answers, can be one of your most important lines of defense on the Internet. For additional information on how you can help prevent identity theft, visit https://www. oppenheimerfunds.com/security.
Who We Are
This joint notice describes the privacy policies of the Oppenheimer funds, OppenheimerFunds, Inc., each of its investment adviser subsidiaries, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. and OFI Global Trust Co. It applies to all Oppenheimer fund accounts you presently have, or may open in the future, using your Social Security number—whether or not you remain a shareholder of our funds. This notice was last updated as of November 2017. In the event it is updated or changed, we will post an updated notice on our website at oppenheimerfunds.com. If you have any questions about this privacy policy, email us by clicking on theContact Us section of our website at oppenheimerfunds.com, write to us at P.O. Box 5270, Denver, CO 80217-5270, or call us at800 CALL OPP (225 5677).
|
51 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
|
52 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
|
53 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
|
54 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
|
55 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-19-099391/g683719snap0008.jpg)
Visit us at oppenheimerfunds.com for24-hr access to account information and transactions or call us at 800.CALL OPP (800.225.5677) for24-hr automated information and automated transactions. Representatives also available Mon–Fri8am-8pm ET.
| | |
Visit Us oppenheimerfunds.com Call Us 800 225 5677 | | |
Follow Us ![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-19-099391/g683719snap0009.jpg)
| | Oppenheimer funds are distributed by OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. 225 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10281-1008 © 2019 OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. All rights reserved. RS0395.001.0119 March 25, 2019 |
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-19-099391/g666141page001.jpg)
Semiannual Report 1/31/2019 Oppenheimer Rochester® Pennsylvania Municipal Fund Important Notice: The Securities and Exchange Commission will permit funds to deliver shareholder reports electronically beginning January 1, 2021. At that time, OppenheimerFunds will send a notice, either by mail or email, each time your fund’s updated report is available on our website (oppenheimerfunds.com). Investors enrolled in electronic delivery will receive the notice by email, with links to the updated report. Investors who are not enrolled in electronic delivery by January 1, 2021 will receive the notice in the mail. All investors who prefer to receive shareholder reports in paper may, at any time, choose that option free of charge by calling 1.800.225.5677.
Important Updates
On October 18, 2018, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, an indirect corporate parent of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. and its subsidiaries OFI Global Asset Management, Inc., OFI SteelPath, Inc. and OFI Advisors, LLC, announced that it has entered into an agreement whereby Invesco Ltd., a global investment management company, will acquire OppenheimerFunds, Inc. As of the date of this report, the transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2019, pending necessary regulatory and other third-party approvals. This is subject to change. See the Notes to Financial Statements for more information.
Update to Shareholder Report Document Delivery
Beginning January 1, 2021, OppenheimerFunds will send a notice, either by mail or email, each time your fund’s updated report is available on our website (oppenheimerfunds.com). Investors who are not enrolled in electronic delivery by January 1, 2021 will receive the notice in the mail. Enrolling in electronic delivery will enable you to receive a direct link to your full shareholder report the moment it becomes available, and limit the amount of mail you receive. All investors who prefer to receive shareholder reports in paper may, at any time, choose that option.
How do you update your delivery preferences?
If you own these shares through a financial intermediary, you may contact your financial intermediary.
If your accounts are held through OppenheimerFunds and you receive statements, confirms, and other documents directly from us, you can enroll in our eDocs DirectSM service atoppenheimerfunds.com or by calling us. Once you’re enrolled, you’ll begin to receive email notifications of updated documents when they become available. If you have any questions, feel free to call us at1.800.225.5677.
Table of Contents
Class A Shares
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS AT 1/31/19
| | | | | | |
| | Class A Shares of the Fund | | |
| | Without Sales Charge | | With Sales Charge | | Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Index |
6-Month | | 2.65% | | -2.23% | | 2.05% |
1-Year | | 12.57 | | 7.22 | | 3.26 |
5-Year | | 6.01 | | 4.98 | | 3.57 |
10-Year | | 8.43 | | 7.90 | | 4.55 |
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Fund returns include changes in share price, reinvested distributions, and a 4.75% maximum applicable sales charge except where “without sales charge” is indicated. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized. Returns do not consider capital gains or income taxes on an individual’s investment. For performance data current to the most recentmonth-end, visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). See Fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses for more information on share classes and sales charges.
Our Twitter handle is @RochesterFunds.
|
3 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
Top Holdings and Allocations
TOP TEN CATEGORIES
| | | | |
Education | | | 13.9 | % |
Higher Education | | | 13.1 | |
U.S. Government Obligations | | | 8.9 | |
General Obligation | | | 8.8 | |
Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement | | | 8.0 | |
Hospital/Healthcare | | | 7.2 | |
Highways/Commuter Facilities | | | 6.2 | |
Adult Living Facilities | | | 3.7 | |
Marine/Aviation Facilities | | | 3.7 | |
Student Housing | | | 3.4 | |
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of January 31, 2019 and are based on total assets.
CREDIT ALLOCATION
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | NRSRO- Rated | | | Sub- Adviser- Rated | | | Total | |
AAA | | | 0.0% | | | | 2.5% | | | | 2.5% | |
AA | | | 18.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 18.0 | |
A | | | 33.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 33.1 | |
BBB | | | 18.8 | | | | 3.4 | | | | 22.2 | |
BB or lower | | | 15.4 | | | | 8.8 | | | | 24.2 | |
Total | | | 85.3% | | | | 14.7% | | | | 100.0% | |
The percentages above are based on the market value of the securities as of January 31, 2019 and are subject to change. OppenheimerFunds, Inc. determines the credit allocation of the Fund’s assets using ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs), such as S&P Global Ratings (S&P). For any security rated by an NRSRO other than S&P, thesub-adviser, OppenheimerFunds, Inc., converts that security’s rating to the equivalent S&P rating. If two or more NRSROs have assigned a rating to a security, the highest rating is used. For securities not rated by an NRSRO, thesub-adviser uses its own credit analysis to assign ratings in categories similar to those of S&P. The use of similar categories is not an indication that thesub-adviser’s credit analysis process is consistent or comparable with any NRSRO’s process were that NRSRO to rate the same security.
For the purposes of this Credit Allocation table, securities rated within the NRSROs’ four highest categories – AAA, AA, A, and BBB – are investment-grade securities. For further details, please consult the Fund’s prospectus or Statement of Additional Information.
|
4 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
Performance
DISTRIBUTION YIELDS
As of 1/31/19
| | | | |
| | Without Sales Charge | | With Sales Charge |
Class A | | 3.44% | | 3.27% |
Class C | | 2.97 | | N/A |
Class Y | | 3.61 | | N/A |
TAXABLE EQUIVALENT YIELDS
| | | | |
As of 1/31/19 | | | | |
Class A | | 4.56% | | |
Class C | | 3.63 | | |
Class Y | | 5.20 | | |
STANDARDIZED YIELDS
| | | | |
For the 30 Days Ended 1/31/19 | | | | |
Class A | | 2.61% | | |
Class C | | 2.08 | | |
Class Y | | 2.98 | | |
UNSUBSIDIZED STANDARDIZED YIELDS
| | | | |
For the 30 Days Ended 1/31/19 |
Class A | | 2.59% | | |
Class C | | 2.07 | | |
Class Y | | 2.97 | | |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS WITHOUT SALES CHARGE AS OF 1/31/19
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Inception Date | | 6-Month | | 1-Year | | 5-Year | | 10-Year | | Since Inception |
Class A (OPATX) | | 9/18/89 | | 2.65% | | 12.57% | | 6.01% | | 8.43% | | 5.57% |
Class C (OPACX) | | 8/29/95 | | 2.31 | | 11.87 | | 5.25 | | 7.63 | | 4.34 |
Class Y (OPAYX) | | 11/29/10 | | 2.87 | | 12.94 | | 6.22 | | N/A | | 5.49 |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS WITH SALES CHARGE AS OF 1/31/19
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Inception Date | | 6-Month | | 1-Year | | 5-Year | | 10-Year | | Since Inception |
Class A (OPATX) | | 9/18/89 | | -2.23% | | 7.22% | | 4.98% | | 7.90% | | 5.39% |
Class C (OPACX) | | 8/29/95 | | 1.31 | | 10.87 | | 5.25 | | 7.63 | | 4.34 |
Class Y (OPAYX) | | 11/29/10 | | 2.87 | | 12.94 | | 6.22 | | N/A | | 5.49 |
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results.The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized. Returns do not consider capital gains or income taxes on an individual’s investments. For performance data current to the most recentmonth-end, visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). Fund returns include changes in share price, reinvested distributions, and the applicable sales charge: for Class A shares, the current maximum initial sales charge of 4.75% and for Class C, the contingent deferred sales charge of 1% for the1-year period. There is no sales charge for Class Y shares.
The Fund’s performance is compared to the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Index, an index of a broad range of investment-grade municipal bonds that measures the performance of the general municipal bond market. The index is unmanaged and cannot be purchased directly by investors. While index comparisons may be useful to provide a benchmark for the Fund’s performance, it must be noted that the Fund’s investments are not
|
5 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
limited to the investments comprising the index. Index performance includes reinvestment of income, but does not reflect transaction costs, fees, expenses, or taxes. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only as a benchmark for the Fund’s performance, and does not predict or depict performance of the Fund. The Fund’s performance reflects the effects of the Fund’s business and operating expenses.
Distribution yields for Class A shares are based on dividends of $0.030 for the22-day accrual period ended January 22, 2019. The yield without sales charge for Class A shares is calculated by dividing annualized dividends by the Class A net asset value (NAV) on January 22, 2019; for the yield with charge, the denominator is the Class A maximum offering price on that date. Distribution yields for Class C and Y are annualized based on dividends of $0.0259 and $0.0315, respectively, for the22-day accrual period ended January 22, 2019 and on the corresponding net asset values on that date.
Standardized yield is based on anSEC-standardized formula designed to approximate the Fund’s annualized hypothetical current income from securities less expenses for the30-day period ended January 31, 2019 and that date’s maximum offering price (for Class A shares) or net asset value (for all other share classes). Each result is compounded semiannually and annualized. Falling share prices artificially increase yields. The unsubsidized standardized yield is computed under anSEC-standardized formula based on net income earned for the30-day period ended January 31, 2019. The calculation excludes any expense reimbursements and thus may result in a lower yield.
Taxable equivalent yield is based on the standardized yield and the 2018 top federal and Pennsylvania tax rate of 42.73%. Calculations factor in the 3.8% tax on unearned income under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as applicable. A portion of the Fund’s distributions may be subject to tax; distributions may also increase an investor’s exposure to the alternative minimum tax. Capital gains distributions are taxable as capital gains. Tax treatments of the Fund’s distributions and capital gains may vary by state; investors should consult a tax advisor to determine if the Fund is appropriate for them. Each result is compounded semiannually and annualized. Falling share prices artificially increase yields.This Report must be preceded or accompanied by a Fund prospectus.
Investments in “tobacco bonds,” which are backed by the proceeds a state or territory receives from the 1998 national litigation settlement with tobacco manufacturers, may be vulnerable to economic and/or legislative events that affect issuers in a particular municipal market sector. Annual payments byMSA-participating manufacturers, for example, hinge on many factors, including annual domestic cigarette shipments, inflation and the relative market share ofnon-participating manufacturers. To date, we believe consumption figures remain within an acceptable range of the assumptions used to structure MSA bonds. Future MSA payments could be reduced if consumption were to fall more rapidly than originally forecast.
Before investing in any of the Oppenheimer funds, investors should carefully consider a fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses contain this and other information about the funds, and may be obtained by asking your financial advisor, visiting oppenheimerfunds.com, or calling 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). Read prospectuses and summary prospectuses carefully before investing.
|
6 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
Shares of Oppenheimer funds are not deposits or obligations of any bank, are not guaranteed by any bank, are not insured by the FDIC or any other agency, and involve investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested.
|
7 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
Fund Expenses
Fund Expenses. As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, which may include sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and/or contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service fees; and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The examples are based on an investment of $1,000.00 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire6-month period ended January 31, 2019.
Actual Expenses. The first section of the table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section for the class of shares you hold, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expense that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000.00 (for example, an $8,600.00 account value divided by $1,000.00 = 8.60), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During 6 Months Ended January 31, 2019” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes.The second section of the table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio for each class of shares, and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year for each class before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example for the class of shares you hold with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such asfront-end or contingent deferred sales charges (loads). Therefore, the “hypothetical” section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
|
8 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | Beginning Account Value August 1, 2018 | | Ending Account Value January 31, 2019 | | Expenses Paid During 6 Months Ended January 31, 2019 | | |
Class A | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | | $ | 1,026.50 | | | | $ | 6.35 | | | |
Class C | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,023.10 | | | | | 9.68 | | | |
Class Y | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,028.70 | | | | | 5.07 | | | |
| | | |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | | | | | | |
Class A | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,018.95 | | | | | 6.33 | | | |
Class C | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,015.68 | | | | | 9.65 | | | |
Class Y | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | | 1,020.21 | | | | | 5.05 | | | |
Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio for that class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect theone-half year period). Those annualized expense ratios, excluding indirect expenses from affiliated funds, based on the6-month period ended January 31, 2019 are as follows:
| | | | |
Class | | Expense Ratios | |
Class A | | | 1.24% | |
Class C | | | 1.89 | |
Class Y | | | 0.99 | |
|
9 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSJanuary 31, 2019 Unaudited
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes—106.5% | | | | | | | | | |
Pennsylvania—85.8% | | | | | | | | | |
$30,000 | | Aliquippa, PA School District1 | | | 4.000% | | | | 12/01/2030 | | | $ | 30,045 | |
1,750,000 | | Aliquippa, PA School District1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 12/01/2041 | | | | 1,785,472 | |
11,500,000 | | Allegheny County, PA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2041 | | | | 12,836,530 | |
4,960,000 | | Allegheny County, PA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2043 | | | | 5,639,619 | |
12,500,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HDA (Allegheny Health Network)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2047 | | | | 13,589,875 | |
35,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HDA (UPMC Health System)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 08/15/2029 | | | | 35,646 | |
160,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HDA (UPMC Health System)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/15/2034 | | | | 162,914 | |
830,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Carlow University)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 11/01/2021 | | | | 888,457 | |
1,125,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Carlow University)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 11/01/2031 | | | | 1,272,634 | |
1,000,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Chatham University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2035 | | | | 1,027,270 | |
615,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Robert Morris University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/15/2037 | | | | 657,429 | |
1,500,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Robert Morris University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/15/2047 | | | | 1,586,580 | |
2,250,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Robert Morris University)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 10/15/2030 | | | | 2,338,875 | |
3,650,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Robert Morris University)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 10/15/2040 | | | | 3,790,707 | |
5,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Robert Morris University)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2028 | | | | 5,585 | |
1,200,000 | | Allegheny County, PA IDA (Propel Charter School-East)1 | | | 6.375 | | | | 08/15/2035 | | | | 1,235,580 | |
800,000 | | Allegheny County, PA IDA (Propel Charter School-Montour)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 08/15/2035 | | | | 828,120 | |
1,500,000 | | Allegheny County, PA IDA (Propel Charter School-Sunrise)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/15/2038 | | | | 1,544,055 | |
630,000 | | Allegheny County, PA IDA (RR/RRSW/RRDC Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2021 | | | | 631,279 | |
1,225,000 | | Allegheny County, PA IDA (RR/RRSW/RRDC Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.100 | | | | 09/01/2026 | | | | 1,226,923 | |
430,000 | | Allegheny County, PA IDA (RR/RRSW/RRDC Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 09/01/2031 | | | | 430,335 | |
300,000 | | Allegheny County, PA IDA (School Facility Devel.)1 | | | 5.900 | | | | 08/15/2026 | | | | 310,119 | |
10,955,000 | | Allegheny County, PA Redevel. Authority (Pittsburgh Mills)1 | | | 5.600 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 10,652,094 | |
1,560,000 | | Allegheny County, PA Residential Finance Authority (Broadview Manor Apartments)1 | | | 5.950 | | | | 01/20/2043 | | | | 1,577,144 | |
1,210,000 | | Allegheny County, PA Residential Finance Authority (Independence House Apartments)1 | | | 6.100 | | | | 01/20/2043 | | | | 1,224,363 | |
1,565,000 | | Allegheny County, PA Residential Finance Authority (Versailles Apartments)1 | | | 6.160 | | | | 01/20/2043 | | | | 1,583,655 | |
1,250,000 | | Allentown, PA City School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2036 | | | | 1,382,075 | |
1,255,000 | | Allentown, PA City School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2037 | | | | 1,381,617 | |
4,000,000 | | Allentown, PA Neighborhood Improvement Zone1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 05/01/2042 | | | | 4,062,240 | |
|
10 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Pennsylvania (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$375,000 | | Berks County, PA IDA (Highlands at Wyomissing Healthcare Facilities)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | | | | | 05/15/2037 | | | $ | 395,775 | |
500,000 | | Berks County, PA IDA (Highlands at Wyomissing Healthcare Facilities)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/15/2042 | | | | 523,070 | |
600,000 | | Berks County, PA IDA (Highlands at Wyomissing Healthcare Facilities)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/15/2047 | | | | 625,566 | |
13,400,000 | | Berks County, PA IDA (THlth/RHosp/BHospital/CHH/JH/PHospital/PottsH Obligated Group)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2047 | | | | 14,554,158 | |
6,500,000 | | Berks County, PA Municipal Authority (Tower Health)2 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2031 | | | | 6,667,018 | |
6,500,000 | | Berks County, PA Municipal Authority (Tower Health)2 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2031 | | | | 6,667,017 | |
15,000 | | Bethlehem, PA Area School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/15/2020 | | | | 15,100 | |
3,000,000 | | Bethlehem, PA Area School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 3,419,850 | |
1,750,000 | | Bethlehem, PA GO1 | | | 6.500 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 1,939,787 | |
480,000 | | Butler County, PA IDA (Greenview Gardens Apartments)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 480,960 | |
1,760,000 | | Butler County, PA IDA (Greenview Gardens Apartments)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 1,762,411 | |
950,000 | | Centre County, PA Hospital Authority (Mt. Nittany Medical Center)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 11/15/2041 | | | | 1,065,225 | |
2,000,000 | | Centre County, PA Hospital Authority (Mt. Nittany Medical Center)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | | | | | 11/15/2046 | | | | 2,280,160 | |
2,830,000 | | Cheltenham Township, PA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 2,859,121 | |
2,000,000 | | Chester County, PA H&EFA (Main Line Health System)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2052 | | | | 2,214,460 | |
1,000,000 | | Chester County, PA IDA (West Chester University Student Hsg.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 1,041,990 | |
1,000,000 | | Clairton, PA Municipal Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 1,062,790 | |
1,220,000 | | Clarion County, PA IDA (Clarion University Foundation)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 1,279,365 | |
2,430,000 | | Clarion County, PA IDA (Clarion University Foundation)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2029 | | | | 2,501,758 | |
3,500,000 | | Clarion County, PA IDA (Clarion University Foundation)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 3,557,820 | |
2,310,000 | | Clarion County, PA IDA (Clarion University Foundation)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2034 | | | | 2,341,555 | |
1,000,000 | | Clarion County, PA IDA (Clarion University Foundation)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2045 | | | | 988,390 | |
2,750,000 | | Cumberland County, PA Municipal Authority (Asbury)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 01/01/2041 | | | | 2,794,275 | |
1,565,000 | | Cumberland County, PA Municipal Authority (Messiah Lifeways)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 1,665,410 | |
3,210,000 | | Cumberland County, PA Municipal Authority (Messiah Lifeways)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 3,369,344 | |
5,225,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Eastern University)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2032 | | | | 5,032,302 | |
|
11 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Pennsylvania (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,750,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Elwyn/ElwynNJ/ElwynCA/Family Support Services Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | | | | | 06/01/2037 | | | $ | 1,861,318 | |
60,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (MAS/MCMCSPA/ MHH/MHP/MHSSPA Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | | | | | 11/15/2023 | | | | 61,746 | |
1,150,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Neumann University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2025 | | | | 1,207,512 | |
1,425,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Neumann University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 1,542,990 | |
2,305,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Neumann University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2035 | | | | 2,462,063 | |
1,250,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Neumann University)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 1,291,013 | |
1,980,000 | | Delaware County, PA IDA (Chester Fund for Education & the Arts)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 1,930,124 | |
1,000,000 | | East Hempfield Township, PA IDA (Millersville University Student Services)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 1,057,400 | |
820,000 | | East Hempfield Township, PA IDA (Millersville University Student Services)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 883,689 | |
1,060,000 | | East Hempfield Township, PA IDA (Millersville University Student Services)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,121,819 | |
1,250,000 | | East Hempfield Township, PA IDA (Millersville University Student Services)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,302,063 | |
75,000 | | Erie, PA City School District1 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 03/01/2039 | | | | 75,191 | |
7,840,000 | | Erie, PA Higher Education Building Authority (Gannon University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 8,270,965 | |
1,000,000 | | Erie, PA Higher Education Building Authority (Gannon University)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2030 | | | | 1,031,160 | |
2,565,000 | | Erie, PA Higher Education Building Authority (Gannon University)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2040 | | | | 2,632,023 | |
1,280,000 | | Erie, PA Water Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2043 | | | | 1,457,818 | |
5,000,000 | | Erie, PA Water Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2049 | | | | 5,607,250 | |
760,000 | | Fayette County, PA Redevel. Authority (Fayette Crossing)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2019 | | | | 765,335 | |
2,100,000 | | Lackawanna County, PA GO1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 09/15/2032 | | | | 2,150,421 | |
3,600,000 | | Lehigh County, PA GPA (Kidspeace Obligated Group)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2023 | | | | 3,607,272 | |
2,747,774 | | Lehigh County, PA GPA (Kidspeace)1 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | | | | | 02/01/2044 | | | | 884,371 | |
2,721,970 | | Lehigh County, PA GPA (Kidspeace)4 | | | 7.500 | | | | | | | | 02/01/2044 | | | | 544 | |
3,437,102 | | Lehigh County, PA GPA (Kidspeace/KC/KNCONY/KCH/KMAKNC/KNCONM/IRSch Obligated Group)1,5 | | | 7.500 | | | | | | | | 02/01/2044 | | | | 3,361,348 | |
5,000,000 | | Luzerne County, PA IDA1 | | | 7.750 | | | | | | | | 12/15/2027 | | | | 5,252,850 | |
4,000,000 | | Montgomery County, PA HEHA (Thomas Jefferson University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2048 | | | | 4,409,160 | |
11,075,000 | | Montgomery County, PA IDA (ARLC/LVE/ATI/ASCS/AMS Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 11/15/2036 | | | | 11,963,658 | |
300,000 | | Montgomery County, PA IDA (Philadelphia Presbyterian Homes)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2025 | | | | 338,925 | |
|
12 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Pennsylvania (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$4,500,000 | | Northampton County, PA General Purpose Authority (Lafayette College)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | | | | | 11/01/2047 | | | $ | 5,036,715 | |
2,860,000 | | Northampton County, PA General Purpose Authority (Moravian College)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 3,043,927 | |
2,250,000 | | Northampton County, PA General Purpose Authority (Moravian College)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2036 | | | | 2,441,858 | |
7,785,000 | | Northampton County, PA General Purpose Authority (St. Luke’s University Health Network)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | | | | | 08/15/2048 | | | | 7,652,344 | |
14,826,610 | | Northampton County, PA IDA (Northampton Generating)6,7,8 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/31/2023 | | | | 4,447,983 | |
3,136,043 | | Northampton County, PA IDA (Northampton Generating)6,7,8 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/31/2023 | | | | 940,813 | |
4,500,000 | | PA Commonwealth Financing Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2035 | | | | 5,051,925 | |
3,000,000 | | PA EDFA (Forum)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 03/01/2029 | | | | 3,166,800 | |
8,500,000 | | PA EDFA (PA Bridges Finco)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/30/2042 | | | | 9,090,410 | |
3,000,000 | | PA EDFA (Philadelphia Biosolids Facility)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 3,080,340 | |
17,715,000 | | PA Geisinger Authority Health System2 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 02/15/2045 | | | | 19,626,464 | |
535,000 | | PA HEFA (Delaware Valley College of Science & Agriculture)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2042 | | | | 513,418 | |
3,000,000 | | PA HEFA (Edinboro University Foundation)1 | | | 5.800 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 3,163,920 | |
3,500,000 | | PA HEFA (Edinboro University Foundation)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2043 | | | | 3,700,935 | |
1,300,000 | | PA HEFA (Gwynedd Mercy College)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2042 | | | | 1,342,575 | |
750,000 | | PA HEFA (Indiana University Foundation)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 828,203 | |
2,650,000 | | PA HEFA (La Salle University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2029 | | | | 2,776,750 | |
40,000 | | PA HEFA (Pennsylvania State University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 03/01/2022 | | | | 40,110 | |
1,400,000 | | PA HEFA (Shippensburg University Student Services)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2035 | | | | 1,555,792 | |
3,000,000 | | PA HEFA (Shippensburg University)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 3,324,720 | |
7,000,000 | | PA HEFA (Shippensburg University)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2043 | | | | 7,802,900 | |
1,750,000 | | PA HEFA (St. Francis University)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2031 | | | | 1,947,698 | |
2,250,000 | | PA HEFA (St. Francis University)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2041 | | | | 2,519,168 | |
1,000,000 | | PA HEFA (Ursinus College)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 01/01/2029 | | | | 1,052,710 | |
1,000,000 | | PA HEFA (Widener University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/15/2038 | | | | 1,039,560 | |
5,000,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (Harrisburg Area Community College)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 5,243,650 | |
3,500,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (School District of Philadelphia)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2027 | | | | 3,732,155 | |
4,410,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (School District of Philadelphia)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2028 | | | | 4,688,800 | |
3,000,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (School District of Philadelphia)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2029 | | | | 3,183,120 | |
250,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (School District of Philadelphia)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2030 | | | | 264,563 | |
4,780,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (School District of Philadelphia)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2032 | | | | 5,042,183 | |
1,000,000 | | PA Southcentral General Authority (Hanover Hospital)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2029 | | | | 1,141,110 | |
3,750,000 | | PA State Public School Building Authority (Philadelphia School District)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2027 | | | | 4,338,750 | |
|
13 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Pennsylvania (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$8,795,000 | | PA State Public School Building Authority (Philadelphia School District)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | | | | | 06/01/2032 | | | $ | 9,921,727 | |
4,800,000 | | PA State Public School Building Authority (Philadelphia School District)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2036 | | | | 5,309,664 | |
200,000 | | PA State Public School Building Authority (Philadelphia School District)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2036 | | | | 241,966 | |
500,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2030 | | | | 570,890 | |
1,000,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2031 | | | | 1,135,770 | |
2,000,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 2,213,360 | |
1,050,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2035 | | | | 1,195,131 | |
6,000,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 6,691,260 | |
4,100,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.500 | 3 | | | | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 4,378,677 | |
900,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.500 | 3 | | | | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 961,173 | |
5,000,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2042 | | | | 5,730,650 | |
2,820,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 6.000 | 3 | | | | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 3,036,914 | |
610,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 6.000 | 3 | | | | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 656,921 | |
570,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 6.000 | 3 | | | | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 613,844 | |
10,000,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 6.375 | 3 | | | | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 12,330,400 | |
2,000,000 | | PA West Shore Area Hospital Authority (Holy Spirit Hospital of the Sisters of Christian Charity)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 2,197,260 | |
1,835,000 | | PA West Shore Area Hospital Authority (Holy Spirit Hospital of the Sisters of Christian Charity)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | | | | | 01/01/2041 | | | | 1,999,306 | |
1,430,000 | | Pennsylvania State University1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2041 | | | | 1,627,669 | |
2,500,000 | | Pennsylvania State University1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2047 | | | | 2,859,250 | |
18,700,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Airport, Series B1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 20,470,703 | |
2,500,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Architecture & Design Charter School)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | | | | | 03/15/2043 | | | | 1,905,350 | |
450,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Discovery Charter School)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2032 | | | | 452,205 | |
500,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Discovery Charter School)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2042 | | | | 503,640 | |
1,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Global Leadership Academy)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | | | | | 11/15/2030 | | | | 1,015,260 | |
500,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Global Leadership Academy)1 | | | 6.375 | | | | | | | | 11/15/2040 | | | | 509,395 | |
2,040,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (International Apartments Temple University)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | | | | | 06/15/2030 | | | | 2,094,529 | |
4,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (International Apartments Temple University)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | | | | | 06/15/2042 | | | | 4,077,240 | |
1,640,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Richard Allen Prep Charter School)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2033 | | | | 1,397,149 | |
2,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Tacony Academy Charter School)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | | | | | 06/15/2033 | | | | 2,146,880 | |
3,090,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Tacony Academy Charter School)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | | | | | 06/15/2043 | | | | 3,323,110 | |
13,365,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (TJU/TJUHS/TJUH/JUP/AHlth/AHlthF/ AMH/LHosp/AriaH/AHSys Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2047 | | | | 14,626,522 | |
|
14 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Pennsylvania (Continued) | | | | | | | | | |
$4,165,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (University Plaza Associates)1 | | | 5.000% | | | | 12/01/2058 | | | $ | 4,387,869 | |
2,780,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. Senior Living (Presbyterian Homes Germantown)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 2,782,307 | |
3,620,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Gas Works1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2047 | | | | 3,974,072 | |
3,500,000 | | Philadelphia, PA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 3,959,655 | |
6,260,000 | | Philadelphia, PA GO1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 6,704,585 | |
250,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Hsg. Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2021 | | | | 250,780 | |
1,300,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Hsg. Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2039 | | | | 1,430,676 | |
2,415,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Hsg. Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2042 | | | | 2,648,724 | |
3,335,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Hsg. Authority (PHA Headquarters)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2047 | | | | 3,635,417 | |
1,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Municipal Authority1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 04/01/2034 | | | | 1,007,800 | |
20,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Parking Authority, Series A1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 02/15/2029 | | | | 20,062 | |
20,000 | | Philadelphia, PA School District1 | | | 4.375 | | | | 06/01/2034 | | | | 20,037 | |
10,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2028 | | | | 11,492,100 | |
10,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2029 | | | | 11,433,400 | |
1,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2032 | | | | 1,123,300 | |
1,895,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Water & Wastewater1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2052 | | | | 2,105,648 | |
7,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Water & Wastewater1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2053 | | | | 7,805,280 | |
2,665,000 | | Pittsburgh, PA Urban Redevel. Authority (Marian Plaza)1 | | | 6.130 | | | | 01/20/2043 | | | | 2,694,661 | |
4,000,000 | | Pottsville, PA Hospital Authority (LVHN/LVlyH/ LVHM/SRehC/SRMC/NPHC/SMCSJS/PMCtr/PHSys Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 4,393,840 | |
900,000 | | Reading, PA Hsg. Auth (Goggle Works Apts.)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 06/01/2042 | | | | 917,964 | |
2,895,000 | | Reading, PA Hsg. Auth (Goggle Works Apts.)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 06/01/2052 | | | | 2,958,169 | |
1,500,000 | | Reading, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2037 | | | | 1,689,630 | |
1,500,000 | | Reading, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2038 | | | | 1,683,960 | |
820,000 | | Scranton, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 923,263 | |
750,000 | | Scranton, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2035 | | | | 840,188 | |
1,350,000 | | Susquehanna, PA Area Regional Airport Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 1,461,861 | |
2,000,000 | | Westmoreland County, PA Municipal Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/15/2038 | | | | 2,234,360 | |
2,600,000 | | Wilkes-Barre, PA Area School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2034 | | | | 2,921,854 | |
2,125,000 | | Wilkes-Barre, PA Area School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2036 | | | | 2,370,629 | |
110,000 | | York County, PA IDA (York Water)1 | | | 4.750 | | | | 10/01/2036 | | | | 110,100 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 540,350,317 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Possessions—20.7% | | | | | | | | | |
700,000 | | Guam Hsg. Corp. (Single Family Mtg.)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 09/01/2031 | | | | 709,786 | |
185,000 | | Guam Power Authority, Series A1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2023 | | | | 202,969 | |
235,000 | | Guam Power Authority, Series A1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2024 | | | | 258,086 | |
420,000 | | Guam Power Authority, Series A1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2030 | | | | 458,350 | |
470,000 | | Northern Mariana Islands Commonwealth, Series A | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2022 | | | | 457,512 | |
1,155,000 | | Northern Mariana Islands Ports Authority, Series A | | | 6.250 | | | | 03/15/2028 | | | | 1,089,361 | |
|
15 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
U.S. Possessions (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$855,000 | | Northern Mariana Islands Ports Authority, Series A | | | 6.600 | % | | | | | | | 03/15/2028 | | | $ | 850,810 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 5.125 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 2,737,500 | |
810,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2029 | | | | 749,250 | |
1,460,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 5.750 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,357,800 | |
1,005,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 954,750 | |
1,980,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 6.125 | 3 | | | | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 1,900,800 | |
17,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 05/15/2039 | | | | 17,190,060 | |
53,320,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC) | | | 7.153 | 9 | | | | | | | 05/15/2050 | | | | 7,080,896 | |
626,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC) | | | 7.622 | 9 | | | | | | | 05/15/2057 | | | | 22,673,035 | |
2,185,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2029 | | | | 1,237,256 | |
7,405,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO, AGC1 | | | 5.125 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 7,626,409 | |
9,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.750 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 5,073,750 | |
120,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.750 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 67,650 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.750 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 1,623,750 | |
15,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO, NPFGC1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 15,525 | |
790,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 451,288 | |
1,250,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 717,187 | |
9,745,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 5,566,831 | |
403,060 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 260,478 | |
403,059 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 260,477 | |
336,338 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | | | | | 01/01/2021 | | | | 217,358 | |
336,339 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 217,359 | |
112,113 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | | | | | 01/01/2022 | | | | 72,453 | |
112,113 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 72,453 | |
1,435,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA4 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 898,669 | |
6,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series SS, NPFGC | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2025 | | | | 6,020,580 | |
1,450,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT4 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2032 | | | | 904,438 | |
2,445,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series XX4 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2040 | | | | 1,531,181 | |
725,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ4 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 452,219 | |
1,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority4 | | | 5.300 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 675,000 | |
10,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series A4 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 2,975 | |
325,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series H4 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 96,688 | |
270,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure4 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 40,500 | |
1,400,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure (Mepsi Campus)4 | | | 6.500 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2037 | | | | 283,500 | |
1,250,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University) | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 03/01/2036 | | | | 1,170,313 | |
125,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University) | | | 5.125 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2032 | | | | 120,000 | |
185,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University) | | | 5.375 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2042 | | | | 175,519 | |
1,265,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 803,275 | |
2,070,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 1,164,375 | |
1,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 6.500 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 937,500 | |
1,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 6.750 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 625,000 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2034 | | | | 1,897,500 | |
1,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, AMBAC | | | 10.000 | 10 | | | | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,056,950 | |
1,015,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Series D4 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 631,838 | |
5,725,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., Series B4 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2031 | | | | 314,875 | |
|
16 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
U.S. Possessions (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$950,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 5.500 | % | | | | | | | 08/01/2042 | | | $ | 465,500 | |
20,130,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C4 | | | 5.750 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2057 | | | | 16,657,575 | |
3,235,000 | | University of Puerto Rico, Series P | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2030 | | | | 3,008,550 | |
1,300,000 | | University of Puerto Rico, Series Q | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2030 | | | | 1,209,000 | |
2,500,000 | | V.I. Public Finance Authority, Series C | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2039 | | | | 2,290,625 | |
2,195,000 | | V.I. Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | 6.497 | 9 | | | | | | | 05/15/2035 | | | | 614,007 | |
4,150,000 | | V.I. Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | 6.872 | 9 | | | | | | | 05/15/2035 | | | | 1,055,262 | |
7,000,000 | | V.I. Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | 7.622 | 9 | | | | | | | 05/15/2035 | | | | 1,779,960 | |
1,475,000 | | V.I. Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. (TASC)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/15/2031 | | | | 1,477,434 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 130,511,997 | |
Total Investments, at Value (Cost $695,007,857)—106.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 670,862,314 | |
Net Other Assets (Liabilities)—(6.5) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (41,004,561 | ) |
Net Assets—100.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 629,857,753 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Footnotes to Statement of Investments
1. All or a portion of the security position has been segregated for collateral to cover borrowings. See Note 9 of the accompanying Notes.
2. Security represents the underlying municipal bond with respect to an inverse floating rate security held by the Fund. The bond was purchased by the Fund and subsequently transferred to a trust, which issued the related inverse floating rate security. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
3. Denotes a step bond: a zero coupon bond that converts to a fixed or variable interest rate at a designated future date.
4. This security is not accruing income because its issuer has missed or is expected to miss interest and/or principal payments. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
5. All or a portion of the security position is when-issued or delayed delivery to be delivered and settled after period end. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
6. Interest or dividend ispaid-in-kind, when applicable.
7. This security is accruing partial income at an anticipated effective rate based on expected interest and/or principal payments. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate.
8. The value of this security was determined using significant unobservable inputs. See Note 3 of the accompanying Notes.
9. Zero coupon bond reflects effective yield on the original acquisition date.
10. This interest rate resets periodically. Interest rate shown reflects the rate in effect at period end. The rate on this variable rate security is not based on a published reference rate and spread but is determined by the issuer or agent based on current market conditions.
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below:
| | |
AGC | | Assured Guaranty Corp. |
AHlth | | Abington Health |
AHlthF | | Abington Health Foundation |
AHSys | | Aria Health System |
AMBAC | | AMBAC Indemnity Corp. |
AMH | | Abington Memorial Hospital |
AMS | | ACTS Management Services, Inc. |
AriaH | | Aria Health |
ARLC | | ACTS Retirement-Life Communities, Inc. |
|
17 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below: (Continued)
| | |
ASCS | | ACTS Signature Community Services, Inc. |
ATI | | Azalea Trace, Inc. |
BHospital | | Brandywine Hospital |
CHH | | Chestnut Hill Hospital |
EDFA | | Economic Devel. Finance Authority |
ElwynCA | | Elwyn New Jersey |
ElwynNJ | | Elwyn New Jersey |
GO | | General Obligation |
GPA | | General Purpose Authority |
H&EFA | | Health and Educational Facilities Authority |
HDA | | Hospital Devel. Authority |
HEBA | | Higher Education Building Authority |
HEFA | | Higher Education Facilities Authority |
HEHA | | Higher Education and Health Authority |
IDA | | Industrial Devel. Agency |
IRSch | | Iron Range School |
ITEMECF | | Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Community Facilities |
JH | | Jennersville Hospital |
JUP | | Jefferson University Physicians |
KC | | Kidspeace Corporation |
KCH | | Kidspeace Childrens Hospital |
KMAKNC | | Kidspeace Mesabi Academy |
KNCONM | | Kidspeace National Centers of North America |
KNCONY | | Kidspeace National Centers of New York |
LHosp | | Landsdale Hospital |
LVE | | Lanier Village Estates, Inc. |
LVHM | | Lehigh Valley Hospital-Muhlenberg |
LVHN | | Lehigh Valley Health Network |
LVlyH | | Lehigh Valley Hospital |
MAS | | Mercy Adult Services |
MCMCSPA | | Mercy Catholic Medical Center of Southeastern Pennsylvania |
MHH | | Mercy Haverford Foundation |
MHP | | Mercy Health Plan |
MHSSPA | | Mercy Health System of Southeastern Pennsylvania |
NPFGC | | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
NPHC | | Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Corp. |
PHospital | | Phoenixville Hospital |
PHSys | | Pocono Health System |
PMCtr | | Pocono Medical Center |
PottsH | | Pottstown Hospital |
RHosp | | Reading Hospital |
RR | | Residential Resources |
RRDC | | Residential Resources Devel. Corp. |
RRSW | | Residential Resources Southwest |
SMCSJS | | Schuylkill Medical Center South Jackson Street |
SRehC | | Simpson Retirement Communities |
SRMC | | Schuylkill Regional Medical Center |
TASC | | Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds |
THlth | | Tower Health |
TJU | | Thomas Jefferson University |
|
18 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below: (Continued)
| | |
TJUH | | Thomas Jefferson University Hospital |
TJUHS | | TJUH System |
UPMC | | University of Pittsburgh Medical Center |
V.I. | | United States Virgin Islands |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
19 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIESJanuary 31, 2019 Unaudited
| | | | |
Assets | | | | |
| |
Investments, at value (cost $695,007,857)—see accompanying statement of investments | | $ | 670,862,314 | |
|
| |
Cash | | | 621,967 | |
|
| |
Receivables and other assets: | | | | |
Interest | | | 6,953,199 | |
Shares of beneficial interest sold | | | 1,055,120 | |
Investments sold on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis | | | 47,038 | |
Other | | | 135,653 | |
| | | | |
Total assets | | | 679,675,291 | |
| | | | |
| |
Liabilities | | | | |
| |
Payables and other liabilities: | | | | |
Payable for short-term floating rate notes issued (See Note 4) | | | 32,855,000 | |
Payable for borrowings (See Note 9) | | | 15,700,000 | |
Dividends | | | 556,190 | |
Shares of beneficial interest redeemed | | | 403,089 | |
Distribution and service plan fees | | | 107,940 | |
Trustees’ compensation | | | 106,723 | |
Interest expense on borrowings | | | 32,954 | |
Shareholder communications | | | 6,636 | |
Other | | | 49,006 | |
| | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 49,817,538 | |
| | | | |
| |
| |
Net Assets | | $ | 629,857,753 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| |
Composition of Net Assets | | | | |
| |
Paid-in capital | | $ | 774,313,818 | |
|
| |
| |
Total accumulated loss | | | (144,456,065) | |
| | | | |
Net Assets | | $ | 629,857,753 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share | | | | |
| |
Class A Shares: | | | | |
| |
Net asset value and redemption price per share (based on net assets of $415,094,521 and 39,568,057 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | | $10.49 | |
| |
Maximum offering price per share (net asset value plus sales charge of 4.75% of offering price) | | | $11.01 | |
|
| |
| |
Class C Shares: | | | | |
| |
Net asset value, redemption price (excludes applicable contingent deferred sales charge) and offering price per share (based on net assets of $157,520,587 and 15,057,302 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | | $10.46 | |
|
| |
| |
Class Y Shares: | | | | |
| |
Net asset value, redemption price and offering price per share (based on net assets of $57,242,645 and 5,453,267 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | | $10.50 | |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
20 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONSFor the Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 Unaudited
| | | | |
| |
Investment Income | | | | |
| |
Interest | | $ | 17,386,187 | |
Expenses | | | | |
| |
Management fees | | | 1,681,612 | |
|
| |
Distribution and service plan fees: | | | | |
Class A | | | 509,213 | |
Class C | | | 719,205 | |
|
| |
Transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees: | | | | |
Class A | | | 210,671 | |
Class C | | | 80,014 | |
Class Y | | | 26,995 | |
|
| |
Shareholder communications: | | | | |
Class A | | | 9,914 | |
Class C | | | 4,828 | |
Class Y | | | 1,174 | |
|
| |
Interest expense and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued (See Note 4) | | | 462,353 | |
|
| |
Borrowing fees | | | 336,322 | |
|
| |
Interest expense on borrowings | | | 161,311 | |
|
| |
Trustees’ compensation | | | 4,666 | |
|
| |
Custodian fees and expenses | | | 2,678 | |
|
| |
Other | | | 174,734 | |
| | | | |
Total expenses | | | 4,385,690 | |
|
| |
| |
Net Investment Income | | | 13,000,497 | |
| | | | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | | |
| |
Net realized loss on investment transactions | | | (35,964,892) | |
|
| |
| |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investment transactions | | | 39,181,078 | |
|
| |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | | $ | 16,216,683 | |
| | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
21 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 (Unaudited) | | | Year Ended July 31, 20181 | |
| | |
Operations | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net investment income | | $ | 13,000,497 | | | $ | 26,072,945 | |
| |
Net realized loss | | | (35,964,892) | | | | (39,669,100) | |
| |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | 39,181,078 | | | | 31,315,112 | |
| | | | |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | | | 16,216,683 | | | | 17,718,957 | |
| | |
Dividends and/or Distributions to Shareholders | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Dividends and distributions declared: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (7,329,799) | | | | (18,501,626) | |
Class B2 | | | — | | | | (37,707) | |
Class C | | | (2,264,724) | | | | (6,124,203) | |
Class Y | | | (1,006,385) | | | | (2,018,635) | |
| | | | |
Total dividends and distributions declared | | | (10,600,908) | | | | (26,682,171) | |
| | |
Beneficial Interest Transactions | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from beneficial interest transactions: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (11,839,645) | | | | (71,558,257) | |
Class B2 | | | — | | | | (2,593,497) | |
Class C | | | (5,571,836) | | | | (35,340,354) | |
Class Y | | | 6,936,720 | | | | (3,952,301) | |
| | | | |
Total beneficial interest transactions | | | (10,474,761) | | | | (113,444,409) | |
Net Assets | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total decrease | | | (4,858,986) | | | | (122,407,623) | |
| |
Beginning of period | | | 634,716,739 | | | | 757,124,362 | |
| | | | |
End of period | | $ | 629,857,753 | | | $ | 634,716,739 | |
| | | | |
1. Prior period amounts have been conformed to current year presentation. See Notes to Financial Statements, Notes 2 — New Accounting Pronouncements for further details.
2. Effective June 1, 2018, all Class B shares converted to Class A shares.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
22 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT
OF CASH FLOWSFor the Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 Unaudited
| | | | |
| |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 16,216,683 | |
|
| |
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | |
Purchase of investment securities | | | (119,123,497) | |
Proceeds from disposition of investment securities | | | 140,757,521 | |
Short-term investment securities, net | | | 271,704 | |
Premium amortization | | | 2,142,900 | |
Discount accretion | | | (4,653,280) | |
Net realized loss on investment transactions | | | 35,964,892 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investment transactions | | | (39,181,078) | |
Change in assets: | | | | |
Decrease in other assets | | | 113,845 | |
Increase in interest receivable | | | (295,738) | |
Decrease in receivable for securities sold | | | 4,785,560 | |
Change in liabilities: | | | | |
Decrease in other liabilities | | | (25,363) | |
| | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 36,974,149 | |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | | | | |
Proceeds from borrowings | | | 109,100,000 | |
Payments on borrowings | | | (108,500,000) | |
Payments/proceeds on short-term floating rate notes issued | | | (15,710,000) | |
Proceeds from shares sold | | | 32,479,188 | |
Payments on shares redeemed | | | (52,674,396) | |
Cash distributions paid | | | (1,292,625) | |
| | | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (36,597,833) | |
|
| |
Net increase in cash | | | 376,316 | |
|
| |
Cash, beginning balance | | | 245,651 | |
| | | | |
Cash, ending balance | | $ | 621,967 | |
| | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of reinvestment of dividends and distributions of $9,100,489.
Cash paid for interest on borrowings—$146,479.
Cash paid for interest on short-term floating rate notes issued—$462,353.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
23 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 (Unaudited) | | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 |
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $10.40 | | | | $10.44 | | | | $10.67 | | | | $10.49 | | | | $10.38 | | | $10.53 |
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.22 | | | | 0.41 | | | | 0.47 | | | | 0.59 | | | | 0.63 | | | 0.67 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.05 | | | | (0.03) | | | | (0.16) | | | | 0.20 | | | | 0.09 | | | (0.22) |
| | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.27 | | | | 0.38 | | | | 0.31 | | | | 0.79 | | | | 0.72 | | | 0.45 |
|
|
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.18) | | | | (0.42) | | | | (0.54) | | | | (0.61) | | | | (0.61) | | | (0.60) |
|
|
Net asset value, end of period | | | $10.49 | | | | $10.40 | | | | $10.44 | | | | $10.67 | | | | $10.49 | | | $10.38 |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 2.65% | | | | 3.84% | | | | 2.96% | | | | 7.84% | | | | 6.98% | | | 4.57% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $415,094 | | | | $423,210 | | | | $500,340 | | | | $526,247 | | | | $552,146 | | | $586,870 |
|
|
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $417,820 | | | | $443,594 | | | | $509,600 | | | | $537,284 | | | | $589,000 | | | $624,096 |
|
|
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.24% | | | | 4.09% | | | | 4.50% | | | | 5.59% | | | | 5.93% | | | 6.60% |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 0.93% | | | | 0.97% | | | | 0.83% | | | | 0.80% | | | | 0.77% | | | 0.76% |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.16% | | | | 0.18% | | | | 0.11% | | | | 0.11% | | | | 0.11% | | | 0.14% |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.15% | | | | 0.03% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.07% | | | 0.13% |
| | | |
Total expenses | | | 1.24% | | | | 1.18% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 0.97% | | | | 0.95% | | | 1.03% |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 1.24% | | | | 1.18% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 0.97% | | | | 0.95% | | | 1.03%5 |
|
|
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 18% | | | | 13% | | | | 20% | | | | 6% | | | | 12% | | | 6% |
|
24 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
5. Waiver was less than 0.005%.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
25 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTSContinued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C | | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 (Unaudited) | | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 |
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $10.37 | | | | $10.42 | | | | $10.64 | | | | $10.47 | | | | $10.36 | | | $10.51 |
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.19 | | | | 0.34 | | | | 0.40 | | | | 0.51 | | | | 0.55 | | | 0.60 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.05 | | | | (0.04) | | | | (0.15) | | | | 0.19 | | | | 0.09 | | | (0.22) |
| | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.24 | | | | 0.30 | | | | 0.25 | | | | 0.70 | | | | 0.64 | | | 0.38 |
|
|
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.15) | | | | (0.35) | | | | (0.47) | | | | (0.53) | | | | (0.53) | | | (0.53) |
|
|
Net asset value, end of period | | | $10.46 | | | | $10.37 | | | | $10.42 | | | | $10.64 | | | | $10.47 | | | $10.36 |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 2.31% | | | | 3.07% | | | | 2.23% | | | | 7.06% | | | | 6.19% | | | 3.79% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $157,521 | | | | $161,664 | | | | $199,497 | | | | $220,769 | | | | $226,296 | | | $236,269 |
|
|
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $158,673 | | | | $173,445 | | | | $209,822 | | | | $221,129 | | | | $239,680 | | | $255,808 |
|
|
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.58% | | | | 3.43% | | | | 3.79% | | | | 4.84% | | | | 5.17% | | | 5.84% |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 1.58% | | | | 1.62% | | | | 1.56% | | | | 1.55% | | | | 1.52% | | | 1.52% |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.16% | | | | 0.18% | | | | 0.11% | | | | 0.11% | | | | 0.11% | | | 0.14% |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.15% | | | | 0.03% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.07% | | | 0.13% |
| | | |
Total expenses | | | 1.89% | | | | 1.83% | | | | 1.73% | | | | 1.72% | | | | 1.70% | | | 1.79% |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 1.89% | | | | 1.83% | | | | 1.73% | | | | 1.72% | | | | 1.70% | | | 1.79%5 |
|
|
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 18% | | | | 13% | | | | 20% | | | | 6% | | | | 12% | | | 6% |
|
26 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
5. Waiver was less than 0.005%.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
27 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTSContinued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class Y | | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 (Unaudited) | | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 |
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $10.40 | | | | $10.45 | | | | $10.68 | | | | $10.50 | | | | $10.38 | | | $10.53 |
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.24 | | | | 0.44 | | | | 0.47 | | | | 0.60 | | | | 0.65 | | | 0.69 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.05 | | | | (0.05) | | | | (0.14) | | | | 0.20 | | | | 0.10 | | | (0.22) |
| | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.29 | | | | 0.39 | | | | 0.33 | | | | 0.80 | | | | 0.75 | | | 0.47 |
|
|
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.19) | | | | (0.44) | | | | (0.56) | | | | (0.62) | | | | (0.63) | | | (0.62) |
|
|
Net asset value, end of period | | | $10.50 | | | | $10.40 | | | | $10.45 | | | | $10.68 | | | | $10.50 | | | $10.38 |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 2.87% | | | | 3.98% | | | | 3.14% | | | | 7.99% | | | | 7.23% | | | 4.72% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $57,243 | | | | $49,843 | | | | $54,584 | | | | $30,357 | | | | $29,137 | | | $26,322 |
|
|
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $53,595 | | | | $45,899 | | | | $39,973 | | | | $28,378 | | | | $30,378 | | | $28,437 |
|
|
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.48% | | | | 4.33% | | | | 4.53% | | | | 5.73% | | | | 6.07% | | | 6.75% |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 0.68% | | | | 0.72% | | | | 0.65% | | | | 0.65% | | | | 0.62% | | | 0.62% |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.16% | | | | 0.18% | | | | 0.11% | | | | 0.11% | | | | 0.11% | | | 0.14% |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.15% | | | | 0.03% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.07% | | | 0.13% |
| | | |
Total expenses | | | 0.99% | | | | 0.93% | | | | 0.82% | | | | 0.82% | | | | 0.80% | | | 0.89% |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 0.99% | | | | 0.93% | | | | 0.82% | | | | 0.82% | | | | 0.80% | | | 0.89% |
|
|
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 18% | | | | 13% | | | | 20% | | | | 6% | | | | 12% | | | 6% |
|
28 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
29 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSJanuary 31, 2019 Unaudited
1. Organization
Oppenheimer Rochester Pennsylvania Municipal Fund (the “Fund”) is a separate series of Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust, a diversifiedopen-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”), as amended. The Fund’s investment objective is to seektax-free income. The Fund’s investment adviser is OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (“OFI Global” or the “Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (“OFI” or the“Sub-Adviser”). The Manager has entered into asub-advisory agreement with OFI.
The Fund offers Class A, Class C and Class Y shares, and previously offered Class B shares for new purchase through June 29, 2012. Subsequent to that date, no new purchases of Class B shares were permitted. Reinvestment of dividend and/or capital gain distributions and exchanges of Class B shares into and from other Oppenheimer funds were permitted through May 31, 2018. Effective June 1, 2018 (the “Conversion Date”), all Class B shares converted to Class A shares. Class A shares are sold at their offering price, which is normally net asset value plus afront-end sales charge. Class C shares are sold, and Class B shares were sold, without afront-end sales charge but may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”). Class Y shares are sold to certain institutional investors or intermediaries without either afront-end sales charge or a CDSC, however, the intermediaries may impose charges on their accountholders who beneficially own Class Y shares. All classes of shares have identical rights and voting privileges with respect to the Fund in general and exclusive voting rights on matters that affect that class alone. Earnings, net assets and net asset value per share may differ due to each class having its own expenses, such as transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees and shareholder communications, directly attributable to that class. Class A and C shares have, and Class B shares had, separate distribution and/or service plans under which they pay, and Class B shares paid, fees. Class Y shares do not pay such fees. Previously issued Class B shares automatically converted to Class A shares 72 months after the date of purchase.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed in the Fund’s preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Security Valuation.All investments in securities are recorded at their estimated fair value, as described in Note 3.
Allocation of Income, Expenses, Gains and Losses.Income, expenses (other than those attributable to a specific class), gains and losses are allocated on a daily basis to each class of shares based upon the relative proportion of net assets represented by such class. Operating expenses directly attributable to a specific class are charged against the operations of that class.
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders. Dividends and distributions to
|
30 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
shareholders, which are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. GAAP, are recorded on theex-dividend date. Income distributions, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly. Capital gain distributions, if any, are declared and paid annually or at other times as determined necessary by the Manager.
The tax character of distributions is determined as of the Fund’s fiscal year end. Therefore, a portion of the Fund’s distributions made to shareholders prior to the Fund’s fiscal year end may ultimately be categorized as a tax return of capital.
Investment Income.Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. Discount and premium, which are included in interest income on the Statement of Operations, are amortized or accreted daily.
Custodian Fees. “Custodian fees and expenses” in the Statement of Operations may include interest expense incurred by the Fund on any cash overdrafts of its custodian account during the period. Such cash overdrafts may result from the effects of failed trades in portfolio securities and from cash outflows resulting from unanticipated shareholder redemption activity. The Fund pays interest to its custodian on such cash overdraft at a rate equal to the Prime Rate plus 0.35%. The “Reduction to custodian expenses” line item, if applicable, represents earnings on cash balances maintained by the Fund during the period. Such interest expense and other custodian fees may be paid with these earnings.
Security Transactions. Security transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses on securities sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
Indemnifications.The Fund’s organizational documents provide current and former Trustees and officers with a limited indemnification against liabilities arising in connection with the performance of their duties to the Fund. In the normal course of business, the Fund may also enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would be dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
Federal Taxes.The Fund intends to comply with provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its investment company taxable income to shareholders. Therefore, no federal income or excise tax provision is required. The Fund files income tax returns in U.S. federal and applicable state jurisdictions. The statute of limitations on the Fund’s tax return filings generally remains open for the three preceding fiscal reporting period ends. The Fund has analyzed its tax positions for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018, including open tax years, and does not believe there are any uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Fund’s financial statements.
During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018, the Fund did not utilize any capital loss carryforwards to offset capital gains realized in that fiscal year. Capital losses with no expiration will be carried forward to future years if not offset by gains.
|
31 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
At period end, it is estimated that the capital loss carryforwards would be $124,771,586, which will not expire.The estimated capital loss carryforward represents the carryforward as of the end of the last fiscal year, increased or decreased by capital losses or gains realized in the first six months of the current fiscal year. During the reporting period, it is estimated that the Fund will not utilize any capital loss carryforward to offset realized capital gains.
Net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) may differ for financial statement and tax purposes. The character of dividends and distributions made during the fiscal year from net investment income or net realized gains are determined in accordance with federal income tax requirements, which may differ from the character of net investment income or net realized gains presented in those financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Also, due to timing of dividends and distributions, the fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the fiscal year in which the income or net realized gain was recorded by the Fund.
The aggregate cost of securities and other investments and the composition of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of securities and other investments for federal income tax purposes at period end are noted in the following table. The primary difference between book and tax appreciation or depreciation of securities and other investments, if applicable, is attributable to the tax deferral of losses or tax realization of financial statement unrealized gain or loss.
| | | | |
Federal tax cost of securities | | $ | 661,043,3331 | |
| | | | |
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 21,918,845 | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (46,064,388) | |
| | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (24,145,543) | |
| | | | |
1.The Federal tax cost of securities does not include cost of $33,964,524, which has otherwise been recognized for financial reporting purposes, related to bonds placed into trusts in conjunction with certain investment transactions. See the Inverse Floating Rate Securities note in Note 4.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncements. In March 2017, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”), ASU2017-08. This provides guidance related to the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Manager has evaluated the impacts of these changes on the financial statements and there are no material impacts.
During August 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued Final Rule ReleaseNo. 33-10532 (the “Rule”), Disclosure Update and Simplification. The rule amends certain financial statement disclosure requirements to conform to U.S. GAAP. The
|
32 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
amendments to Rule6-04.17 of RegulationS-X (balance sheet) remove the requirement to separately state the book basis components of net assets: undistributed (over-distribution of) net investment income (“UNII”), accumulated undistributed net realized gains (losses), and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) at the balance sheet date. Instead, consistent with U.S. GAAP, funds will be required to disclose total distributable earnings. The amendments to Rule6-09 of RegulationS-X (statement of changes in net assets) remove the requirement to separately state the sources of distributions paid. Instead, consistent with U.S. GAAP, funds will be required to disclose the total amount of distributions paid, except that any tax return of capital must be separately disclosed. The amendments also remove the requirement to parenthetically state the book basis amount of UNII on the statement of changes in net assets. The requirements of the Rule were effective November 5, 2018, and the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the current reporting period have been modified accordingly. In addition, certain amounts within the Fund’s Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the prior fiscal period have been modified to conform to the Rule.
3. Securities Valuation
The Fund calculates the net asset value of its shares as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern Time, on each day the New York Stock Exchange (the “Exchange” or “NYSE”) is open for trading, except in the case of a scheduled early closing of the Exchange, in which case the Fund will calculate net asset value of the shares as of the scheduled early closing time of the Exchange.
The Fund’s Board has adopted procedures for the valuation of the Fund’s securities and has delegated theday-to-day responsibility for valuation determinations under those procedures to the Manager. The Manager has established a Valuation Committee which is responsible for determining a fair valuation for any security for which market quotations are not readily available. The Valuation Committee’s fair valuation determinations are subject to review, approval and ratification by the Fund’s Board at least quarterly or more frequently, if necessary.
Valuation Methods and Inputs
Securities are valued primarily using unadjusted quoted market prices, when available, as supplied by third party pricing services or broker-dealers.
The following methodologies are used to determine the market value or the fair value of the types of securities described below:
Corporate and government debt securities (of U.S. or foreign issuers) and municipal debt securities, short-term notes, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, and asset-backed securities are valued at the mean between the bid and asked prices utilizing evaluated prices obtained from third party pricing services or broker-dealers who may use matrix pricing methods to determine the evaluated prices. Pricing services generally price debt securities assuming orderly transactions of an institutional “round lot” size, but some trades may occur in smaller, “odd lot” sizes, sometimes at lower prices than institutional round lot trades. Standard inputs generally considered by third-party pricing vendors include reported
|
33 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
trade data, broker-dealer price quotations, benchmark yields, issuer spreads on comparable securities, the credit quality, yield, maturity, as well as other appropriate factors.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or when a significant event has occurred that would materially affect the value of the security, are fair valued either (i) by a standardized fair valuation methodology applicable to the security type or the significant event as previously approved by the Valuation Committee and the Fund’s Board or (ii) as determined in good faith by the Manager’s Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee considers all relevant facts that are reasonably available, through either public information or information available to the Manager, when determining the fair value of a security. Those standardized fair valuation methodologies include, but are not limited to, valuing securities at the last sale price or initially at cost and subsequently adjusting the value based on: changes in company specific fundamentals, changes in an appropriate securities index, or changes in the value of similar securities which may be further adjusted for any discounts related to security-specific resale restrictions. When possible, such methodologies use observable market inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices of similar securities, observable interest rates, currency rates and yield curves. The methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities nor can it be assured that the Fund can obtain the fair value assigned to a security if it were to sell the security.
To assess the continuing appropriateness of security valuations, the Manager regularly compares prior day prices and sale prices to the current day prices and challenges those prices exceeding certain tolerance levels with the third party pricing service or broker source. For those securities valued by fair valuations, whether through a standardized fair valuation methodology or a fair valuation determination, the Valuation Committee reviews and affirms the reasonableness of the valuations based on such methodologies and fair valuation determinations on a regular basis after considering all relevant information that is reasonably available.
Classifications
Each investment asset or liability of the Fund is assigned a level at measurement date based on the significance and source of the inputs to its valuation. Various data inputs may be used in determining the value of each of the Fund’s investments as of the reporting period end. These data inputs are categorized in the following hierarchy under applicable financial accounting standards:
1) Level1-unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (including securities actively traded on a securities exchange)
2) Level2-inputs other than unadjusted quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and market corroborated inputs such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.)
3) Level3-significant unobservable inputs (including the Manager’s own judgments about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability).
|
34 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
The inputs used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities.
The table below categorizes amounts that are included in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities at period end based on valuation input level:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1— Unadjusted Quoted Prices | | | Level 2— Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | Level 3— Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | Value | |
| |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pennsylvania | | $ | — | | | $ | 534,961,521 | | | $ | 5,388,796 | | | $ | 540,350,317 | |
U.S. Possessions | | | — | | | | 130,511,997 | | | | — | | | | 130,511,997 | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | — | | | $ | 665,473,518 | | | $ | 5,388,796 | | | $ | 670,862,314 | |
| | | | |
Forward currency exchange contracts and futures contracts, if any, are reported at their unrealized appreciation/depreciation at measurement date, which represents the change in the contract’s value from trade date. All additional assets and liabilities included in the above table are reported at their market value at measurement date.
For the reporting period, there were no transfers between levels.
4. Investments and Risks
Inverse Floating Rate Securities.The Fund invests in inverse floating rate securities that pay interest at a rate that varies inversely with short-term interest rates. Because inverse floating rate securities are leveraged instruments, the value of an inverse floating rate security will change more significantly in response to changes in interest rates and other market fluctuations than the market value of a conventional fixed-rate municipal security of similar maturity and credit quality, including the municipal bond underlying an inverse floating rate security.
An inverse floating rate security is created as part of a financial transaction referred to as a “tender option bond” transaction. In most cases, in a tender option bond transaction the Fund sells a fixed-rate municipal bond (the “underlying municipal bond”) to a trust (the “Trust”). The Trust then issues and sells short-term floating rate securities with a fixed principal amount representing a senior interest in the underlying municipal bond to third parties and a residual, subordinate interest in the underlying municipal bond (referred to as an “inverse floating rate security”) to the Fund. The interest rate on the short-term floating rate securities resets periodically, usually weekly, to a prevailing market rate and holders of these securities are granted the option to tender their securities back to the Trust for repurchase at their principal amount plus accrued interest thereon (the “purchase price”) periodically, usually daily or weekly. A remarketing agent for the Trust is required to attempt tore-sell any tendered short-term floating rate securities to new investors for the purchase price. If the remarketing agent is unable to successfullyre-sell the tendered short-term floating rate securities, a liquidity
|
35 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
provider to the Trust must contribute cash to the Trust to ensure that the tendering holders receive the purchase price of their securities on the repurchase date.
Because holders of the short-term floating rate securities are granted the right to tender their securities to the Trust for repurchase at frequent intervals for the purchase price, with such payment effectively guaranteed by the liquidity provider, the securities generally bear short-term rates of interest commensurate with money market instruments. When interest is paid on the underlying municipal bond to the Trust, such proceeds are first used to pay the Trust’s administrative expenses and accrued interest to holders of the short-term floating rate securities, with any remaining amounts being paid to the Fund, as the holder of the inverse floating rate security. Accordingly, the amount of such interest on the underlying municipal bond paid to the Fund is inversely related to the rate of interest on the short-term floating rate securities. Additionally, because the principal amount of the short-term floating rate securities is fixed and is not adjusted in response to changes in the market value of the underlying municipal bond, any change in the market value of the underlying municipal bond is reflected entirely in a change to the value of the inverse floating rate security.
Typically, the terms of an inverse floating rate security grant certain rights to the Fund, as holder. For example, the Fund typically has the right upon request to require that the Trust compel a tender of the short-term floating rate securities to facilitate the Fund’s acquisition of the underlying municipal bond. Following such a request, the Fund pays the Trust the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities and a specified portion of any market value gain on the underlying municipal bond since its deposit into the Trust, which the Trust uses to redeem the short-term floating rate securities. The Trust then distributes the underlying municipal bond to the Fund. Through the exercise of this right, the Fund can voluntarily terminate or “collapse” the Trust, terminate its investment in the related inverse floating rate security and obtain the underlying municipal bond. Additionally, the Fund also typically has the right to exchange with the Trust (i) a principal amount of short-term floating rate securities held by the Fund for a corresponding additional principal amount of the inverse floating rate security or (ii) a principal amount of the inverse floating rate security held by the Fund for a corresponding additional principal amount of short-term floating rate securities (which are typically then sold to other investors). Through the exercise of this right, the Fund may increase (or decrease) the principal amount of short-term floating rate securities outstanding, thereby increasing (or decreasing) the amount of leverage provided by the short-term floating rate securities to the Fund’s investment exposure to the underlying municipal bond.
The Fund’s investments in inverse floating rate securities involve certain risks. As short-term interest rates rise, an inverse floating rate security produces less current income (and, in extreme cases, may pay no income) and as short-term interest rates fall, an inverse floating rate security produces more current income. Thus, if short-term interest rates rise after the issuance of the inverse floating rate security, any yield advantage is reduced or eliminated. All inverse floating rate securities entail some degree of leverage represented by the outstanding principal amount of the related short-term floating rate securities, relative to the par value of the underlying municipal bond. The value of, and income earned on, an inverse floating rate security that has a higher degree of leverage will fluctuate more significantly in response
|
36 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
to changes in interest rates and to changes in the market value of the related underlying municipal bond than that of an inverse floating rate security with a lower degree of leverage, and is more likely to be eliminated entirely under adverse market conditions. Changes in the value of an inverse floating rate security will also be more significant than changes in the market value of the related underlying municipal bond because the leverage provided by the related short-term floating rate securities increases the sensitivity of an inverse floating rate security to changes in interest rates and to the market value of the underlying municipal bond. An inverse floating rate security can be expected to underperform fixed-rate municipal bonds when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates is decreasing (or is already small) or when long-term interest rates are rising, but can be expected to outperform fixed-rate municipal bonds when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates is increasing (or is already large) or when long-term interest rates are falling. Additionally, a tender option bond transaction typically provides for the automatic termination or “collapse” of a Trust upon the occurrence of certain adverse events, usually referred to as “mandatory tender events” or “tender option termination events.” These events may include, among others, a credit ratings downgrade of the underlying municipal bond below a specified level, a decrease in the market value of the underlying municipal bond below a specified amount, a bankruptcy of the liquidity provider or the inability of the remarketing agent to resell to new investors short-term floating rate securities that have been tendered for repurchase by holders thereof. Following the occurrence of such an event, the underlying municipal bond is generally sold for current market value and the proceeds distributed to holders of the short-term floating rate securities and inverse floating rate security, with the holder of the inverse floating rate security (the Fund) generally receiving the proceeds of such sale only after the holders of the short-term floating rate securities have received proceeds equal to the purchase price of their securities (and the liquidity provider is generally required to contribute cash to the Trust only in an amount sufficient to ensure that the holders of the short-term floating rate securities receive the purchase price of their securities in connection with such termination of the Trust). Following the occurrence of such events, the Fund could potentially lose the entire amount of its investment in the inverse floating rate security.
Finally, the Fund may enter into shortfall/reimbursement agreements with the liquidity provider of certain tender option bond transactions in connection with certain inverse floating rate securities held by the Fund. These agreements commit the Fund to reimburse the liquidity provider to the extent that the liquidity provider must provide cash to a Trust, including following the termination of a Trust resulting from the occurrence of a “mandatory tender event.” In connection with the occurrence of such an event and the termination of the Trust triggered thereby, the shortfall/reimbursement agreement will make the Fund liable for the amount of the negative difference, if any, between the liquidation value of the underlying municipal bond and the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities issued by the Trust. Under the standard terms of a tender option bond transaction, absent such a shortfall/ reimbursement agreement, the Fund, as holder of the inverse floating rate security, would not be required to make such a reimbursement payment to the liquidity provider. The Manager monitors the Fund’s potential exposure with respect to these agreements on a daily basis
|
37 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
and intends to take action to terminate the Fund’s investment in related inverse floating rate securities, if it deems it appropriate to do so. At period end, the Fund’s maximum exposure under such agreements is estimated at $18,685,000.
When the Fund creates an inverse floating rate security in a tender option bond transaction by selling an underlying municipal bond to a Trust, the transaction is considered a secured borrowing for financial reporting purposes. As a result of such accounting treatment, the Fund includes the underlying municipal bond on its Statement of Investments and as an asset on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities (but does not separately include the related inverse floating rate security on either). The Fund also includes a liability on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities equal to the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest on the related short-term floating rate securities issued by the Trust. Interest on the underlying municipal bond is recorded as investment income on the Fund’s Statement of Operations, while interest payable on the related short-term floating rate securities is recorded as interest expense. At period end, municipal bond holdings with a value of $47,514,657 shown on the Fund’s Statement of Investments are held by such Trusts and serve as the underlying municipal bonds for the related $32,855,000 in short-term floating rate securities issued and outstanding at that date.
At period end, the inverse floating rate securities associated with tender option bond transactions accounted for as secured borrowings were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | Inverse Floater1 | | Coupon Rate2 | | | Maturity Date | | | Value | |
| | |
| $ 4,465,000 | | | Berks County, PA IDA (THlth/RHosp/BHospital/ CHH/JH/PHospital/PottsH Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2533 Trust3 | | | 8.675 | % | | | 11/1/47 | | | $ | 5,619,158 | |
| 3,250,000 | | | Berks County, PA Municipal Authority Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2016 Trust3 | | | 12.643 | | | | 11/1/31 | | | | 3,584,035 | |
| 3,545,000 | | | Geisinger, PA Authority (Geisinger Health System) Tender Option Bond Series 2015XF-0602 Trust | | | 17.180 | | | | 2/15/45 | | | | 5,456,464 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 14,659,657 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1.For a list of abbreviations used in the Inverse Floater table see the Portfolio Abbreviations table at the end of the Statement of Investments.
2.Represents the current interest rate for the inverse floating rate security.
3.Represents an inverse floating rate security that is subject to a shortfall/reimbursement agreement.
The Fund may also purchase an inverse floating rate security created as part of a tender option bond transaction not initiated by the Fund when a third party, such as a municipal issuer or financial institution, transfers an underlying municipal bond to a Trust. For financial reporting purposes, the Fund includes the inverse floating rate security related to such transaction on its Statement of Investments and as an asset on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities, and interest on the security is recorded as investment income on the Fund’s Statement of Operations.
The Fund may invest in inverse floating rate securities with any degree of leverage (as measured by the outstanding principal amount of related short-term floating rate securities). However, the Fund may only expose up to 20% of its total assets to the effects of leverage
|
38 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
from its investments in inverse floating rate securities. This limitation is measured by comparing the aggregate principal amount of the short-term floating rate securities that are related to the inverse floating rate securities held by the Fund to the total assets of the Fund. The Fund’s exposure to the effects of leverage from its investments in inverse floating rate securities amounts to $32,855,000 or 4.83% of its total assets at period end.
Securities on a When-Issued or Delayed Delivery Basis.The Fund may purchase securities on a “when-issued” basis, and may purchase or sell securities on a “delayed delivery” basis. “When-issued” or “delayed delivery” refers to securities whose terms and indenture are available and for which a market exists, but which are not available for immediate delivery. Delivery and payment for securities that have been purchased by the Fund on a when-issued basis normally takes place within six months and possibly as long as two years or more after the trade date. During this period, such securities do not earn interest, are subject to market fluctuation and may increase or decrease in value prior to their delivery. The purchase of securities on a when-issued basis may increase the volatility of the Fund’s net asset value to the extent the Fund executes such transactions while remaining substantially fully invested. When the Fund engages in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions, it relies on the buyer or seller, as the case may be, to complete the transaction. Their failure to do so may cause the Fund to lose the opportunity to obtain or dispose of the security at a price and yield it considers advantageous. The Fund may also sell securities that it purchased on a when-issued basis or forward commitment prior to settlement of the original purchase.
At period end, the Fund had purchased securities issued on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis and sold securities issued on a delayed delivery basis as follows:
| | | | |
| | When-Issued or Delayed Delivery Basis Transactions | |
| |
Sold securities | | | $47,038 | |
Credit Risk.The Fund invests in high-yield,non-investment-grade bonds, which may be subject to a greater degree of credit risk. Credit risk relates to the ability of the issuer to meet interest or principal payments or both as they become due. The Fund may acquire securities that have missed an interest payment, and is not obligated to dispose of securities whose issuers or underlying obligors subsequently miss an interest and/or principal payment.
In June 2016, Congress passed the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”). PROMESA established a federally-appointed fiscal oversight board (the “Oversight Board”) to oversee Puerto Rico’s financial operations and allows the Oversight Board to file cases on behalf of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or one of its instrumentalities to restructure debt and other obligations of the relevant entity in a “Title III” proceeding. Title III incorporates many provisions of the federal Bankruptcy Code for U.S. territories, and incorporates legal mechanisms for a litigation stay and restructuring of pension and debt obligations, among other provisions. In early May 2017, Title III petitions were filed for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation
|
39 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
(“COFINA”), two of the largest issuers of Puerto Rico debt. Title III petitions for Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority (“PRHTA”) and Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) were subsequently filed inmid-May and early July, respectively. Title III petitions for additional Puerto Rican instrumentalities may be filed. These restructuring proceedings create uncertainty as to the treatment of claims of varying degrees of seniority and the levels and priorities of payment from the affected entities.
Information concerning securities not accruing interest at period end is as follows:
| | | | |
Cost | | | $61,550,001 | |
Market Value | | | $44,221,442 | |
Market Value as % of Net Assets | | | 7.02% | |
Concentration Risk.The Fund invests a large percentage of its total assets in obligations of issuers within its respective state and U.S. territories. Risks may arise from geographic concentration in any state, commonwealth or territory, such as Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam or the Northern Mariana Islands. Certain economic, regulatory or political developments occurring in the state, commonwealth or territory such as ongoing developments in Puerto Rico may impair the ability of certain issuers of municipal securities to pay principal and interest on their obligations.
5. Market Risk Factors
The Fund’s investments in securities and/or financial derivatives may expose the Fund to various market risk factors:
Commodity Risk. Commodity risk relates to the change in value of commodities or commodity indexes as they relate to increases or decreases in the commodities market. Commodities are physical assets that have tangible properties. Examples of these types of assets are crude oil, heating oil, metals, livestock, and agricultural products.
Credit Risk.Credit risk relates to the ability of the issuer of debt to meet interest and principal payments, or both, as they come due. In general, lower-grade, higher-yield debt securities are subject to credit risk to a greater extent than lower-yield, higher-quality securities.
Equity Risk. Equity risk relates to the change in value of equity securities as they relate to increases or decreases in the general market.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk. Foreign exchange rate risk relates to the change in the U.S. dollar value of a security held that is denominated in a foreign currency. The U.S. dollar value of a foreign currency denominated security will decrease as the dollar appreciates against the currency, while the U.S. dollar value will increase as the dollar depreciates against the currency.
Interest Rate Risk.Interest rate risk refers to the fluctuations in value of fixed-income securities resulting from the inverse relationship between price and yield. For example, an increase in general interest rates will tend to reduce the market value of already issued fixed-income investments, and a decline in general interest rates will tend to increase their
|
40 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
5. Market Risk Factors (Continued)
value. In addition, debt securities with longer maturities, which tend to have higher yields, are subject to potentially greater fluctuations in value from changes in interest rates than obligations with shorter maturities.
Volatility Risk.Volatility risk refers to the magnitude of the movement, but not the direction of the movement, in a financial instrument’s price over a defined time period. Large increases or decreases in a financial instrument’s price over a relative time period typically indicate greater volatility risk, while small increases or decreases in its price typically indicate lower volatility risk.
6. Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund has authorized an unlimited number of no par value shares of beneficial interest of each class. Transactions in shares of beneficial interest were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Class A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold1 | | | 1,227,573 | | | $ | 12,831,678 | | | | 3,264,565 | | | $ | 32,744,691 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 585,114 | | | | 6,129,049 | | | | 1,583,701 | | | | 15,894,703 | |
Redeemed | | | (2,944,886 | ) | | | (30,800,372 | ) | | | (12,061,229 | ) | | | (120,197,651 | ) |
| | | | |
Net decrease | | | (1,132,199 | ) | | $ | (11,839,645 | ) | | | (7,212,963 | ) | | $ | (71,558,257 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 34 | | | $ | 343 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,459 | | | | 34,714 | |
Redeemed1 | | | — | | | | — | | | | (262,554 | ) | | | (2,628,554 | ) |
| | | | |
Net decrease | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | (259,061 | ) | | $ | (2,593,497 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | 653,221 | | | $ | 6,811,154 | | | | 1,216,982 | | | $ | 12,191,245 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 196,433 | | | | 2,051,755 | | | | 562,752 | | | | 5,632,066 | |
Redeemed | | | (1,382,169 | ) | | | (14,434,745 | ) | | | (5,343,607 | ) | | | (53,163,665 | ) |
| | | | |
Net decrease | | | (532,515 | ) | | $ | (5,571,836 | ) | | | (3,563,873 | ) | | $ | (35,340,354 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class Y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | 1,279,045 | | | $ | 13,385,730 | | | | 2,307,383 | | | $ | 23,263,618 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 87,769 | | | | 919,685 | | | | 185,867 | | | | 1,870,127 | |
Redeemed | | | (704,163 | ) | | | (7,368,695 | ) | | | (2,926,787 | ) | | | (29,086,046 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | 662,651 | | | $ | 6,936,720 | | | | (433,537 | ) | | $ | (3,952,301 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1.All outstanding Class B shares converted to Class A shares on June 1, 2018.
7. Purchases and Sales of Securities
The aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities, other than short-term
|
41 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
7. Purchases and Sales of Securities (Continued)
obligations, for the reporting period were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Purchases | | | Sales | |
Investment securities | | $ | 119,123,497 | | | $ | 140,757,521 | |
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Management Fees.Under the investment advisory agreement, the Fund pays the Manager a management fee based on the daily net assets of the Fund at an annual rate as shown in the following table:
| | | | |
Fee Schedule | | | |
Up to $200 million | | | 0.60% | |
Next $100 million | | | 0.55 | |
Next $200 million | | | 0.50 | |
Next $250 million | | | 0.45 | |
Next $250 million | | | 0.40 | |
Next $4 billion | | | 0.35 | |
Over $5 billion | | | 0.33 | |
The Fund’s effective management fee for the reporting period was 0.53% of average annual net assets before any applicable waivers.
Sub-Adviser Fees.The Manager has retained theSub-Adviser to provide theday-to-day portfolio management of the Fund. Under theSub-Advisory Agreement, the Manager pays theSub-Adviser an annual fee in monthly installments, equal to a percentage of the investment management fee collected by the Manager from the Fund, which shall be calculated after any investment management fee waivers. The fee paid to theSub-Adviser is paid by the Manager, not by the Fund.
Transfer Agent Fees.OFI Global (the “Transfer Agent”) serves as the transfer and shareholder servicing agent for the Fund. The Fund pays the Transfer Agent a fee based on annual net assets, which shall be calculated after any applicable fee waivers. Fees incurred and average net assets for each class with respect to these services are detailed in the Statement of Operations and Financial Highlights, respectively.
Sub-Transfer Agent Fees.The Transfer Agent has retained Shareholder Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of OFI (the“Sub-Transfer Agent”), to provide theday-to-day transfer agent and shareholder servicing of the Fund. Under theSub-Transfer Agency Agreement, the Transfer Agent pays theSub-Transfer Agent an annual fee in monthly installments, equal to a percentage of the transfer agent fee collected by the Transfer Agent from the Fund, which shall be calculated after any applicable fee waivers. The fee paid to theSub-Transfer Agent is paid by the Transfer Agent, not by the Fund.
Trustees’ Compensation.The Fund has adopted an unfunded retirement plan (the “Plan”) for the Fund’s Independent Trustees. Benefits are based on years of service and fees paid to each Trustee during their period of service. The Plan was frozen with respect to adding new
|
42 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)
participants effective December 31, 2006 (the “Freeze Date”) and existing Plan Participants as of the Freeze Date will continue to receive accrued benefits under the Plan. Active Independent Trustees as of the Freeze Date have each elected a distribution method with respect to their benefits under the Plan.
During the reporting period, the Fund’s projected benefit obligations, payments to retired Trustees and accumulated liability were as follows:
| | | | |
Projected Benefit Obligations Increased | | $ | — | |
Payments Made to Retired Trustees | | | 5,676 | |
Accumulated Liability as of January 31, 2019 | | | 41,407 | |
The Fund’s Board of Trustees (“Board”) has adopted a compensation deferral plan for Independent Trustees that enables Trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from the Fund. For purposes of determining the amount owed to the Trustee under the plan, deferred amounts are treated as though equal dollar amounts had been invested in shares of the Fund or in other Oppenheimer funds selected by the Trustee. The Fund purchases shares of the funds selected for deferral by the Trustee in amounts equal to his or her deemed investment, resulting in a Fund asset equal to the deferred compensation liability. Such assets are included as a component of “Other” within the asset section of the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Deferral of Trustees’ fees under the plan will not affect the net assets of the Fund and will not materially affect the Fund’s assets, liabilities or net investment income per share. Amounts will be deferred until distributed in accordance with the compensation deferral plan.
Distribution and Service Plan(12b-1) Fees.Under its General Distributor’s Agreement with the Fund, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (the “Distributor”) acts as the Fund’s principal underwriter in the continuous public offering of the Fund’s classes of shares.
Service Plan for Class A Shares. The Fund has adopted a Service Plan (the “Plan”) for Class A shares pursuant to Rule12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the Plan, the Fund reimburses the Distributor for a portion of its costs incurred for services provided to accounts that hold Class A shares. Reimbursement is made periodically at an annual rate of up to
0.25% of the daily net assets of Class A shares of the Fund. The Distributor currently uses all of those fees to pay dealers, brokers, banks and other financial institutions periodically for providing personal service and maintenance of accounts of their customers that hold Class A shares. Any unreimbursed expenses the Distributor incurs with respect to Class A shares in any fiscal year cannot be recovered in subsequent periods. Fees incurred by the Fund under the Plan are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Distribution and Service Plan for Class C Shares.The Fund has adopted a Distribution and Service Plan (the “Plan”) for Class C shares, pursuant to Rule12b-1 under the 1940 Act to compensate the Distributor for distributing that share class, maintaining accounts
|
43 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)
and providing shareholder services. Under the Plan, the Fund pays the Distributor an annual asset-based sales charge of 0.75% on Class C shares’ daily net assets. The Fund also pays a service fee under the Plan at an annual rate of 0.15% of daily net assets. The Plan continues in effect from year to year only if the Fund’s Board of Trustees votes annually to approve their continuance at an in person meeting called for that purpose. Fees incurred by the Fund under the Plan are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Sales Charges.Front-end sales charges and CDSC do not represent expenses of the Fund. They are deducted from the proceeds of sales of Fund shares prior to investment or from redemption proceeds prior to remittance, as applicable. The sales charges retained by the Distributor from the sale of shares and the CDSC retained by the Distributor on the redemption of shares is shown in the following table for the period indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | Class A Front-End Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | | | Class A Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | | | Class C Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | |
January 31, 2019 | | | $31,742 | | | | $— | | | | $3,686 | |
9. Borrowings and Other Financing
Borrowings.The Fund can borrow money from banks in amounts up to one third of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less all liabilities and indebtedness other than borrowings (meaning that the value of those assets must be at least 300% of the amount borrowed). The Fund can use those borrowings for investment-related purposes such as purchasing portfolio securities. The Fund also may borrow to meet redemption obligations or for temporary and emergency purposes. When the Fund invests borrowed money in portfolio securities, it is using a speculative investment technique known as leverage and changes in the value of the Fund’s investments will have a larger effect on its share price than if it did not borrow because of the effect of leverage.
The Fund can also use the borrowings for other investment-related purposes, including in connection with the Fund’s inverse floater investments as discussed in Note 4. The Fund may use the borrowings to reduce the leverage amount of, or unwind or “collapse” trusts that issued “inverse floaters” owned by the Fund, or in circumstances in which the Fund has entered into a shortfall and forbearance agreement with the sponsor of the inverse floater trust to meet the Fund’s obligation to reimburse the sponsor of the inverse floater for the difference between the liquidation value of the underlying bond and the amount due to holders of the short-term floating rate notes issued by the Trust. See the discussion in Note 4 (Inverse Floating Rate Securities) for additional information.
The Fund will pay interest and may pay other fees in connection with loans. If the Fund does borrow, it will be subject to greater expenses than funds that do not borrow. The interest on borrowed money and the other fees incurred in conjunction with loans are an expense
|
44 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
9. Borrowings and Other Financing (Continued)
that might reduce the Fund’s yield and return. Expenses incurred by the Fund with respect to interest on borrowings and commitment fees are disclosed separately or as other expenses on the Statement of Operations.
The Fund entered into a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “Agreement”) with conduit lenders and Citibank N.A. which enables it to participate with certain other Oppenheimer funds in a committed, secured borrowing facility that permits borrowings of up to $2.5 billion, collectively, by the Oppenheimer Rochester Funds. To secure the loan, the Fund pledges investment securities in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Securities held in collateralized accounts to cover these borrowings are noted in the Statement of Investments. Interest is charged to the Fund, based on its borrowings, at current commercial paper issuance rates (2.6263% at period end). The Fund pays additional fees monthly to its lender on its outstanding borrowings to manage and administer the facility and is allocated itspro-rata share of an annual structuring fee and ongoing commitment fees both of which are based on the total facility size. Total fees and interest that are included in expenses on the Fund’s Statement of Operations related to its participation in the borrowing facility during the reporting period equal 0.13% of the Fund’s average net assets on an annualized basis. The Fund has the right to prepay such loans and terminate its participation in the conduit loan facility at any time upon prior notice.
At period end, the Fund had borrowings outstanding at an interest rate of 2.6263%.
Details of the borrowings for the reporting period are as follows:
| | | | |
Average Daily Loan Balance | | $ | 13,262,500 | |
Average Daily Interest Rate | | | 2.369 | % |
Fees Paid | | $ | 104,002 | |
Interest Paid | | $ | 146,479 | |
Reverse Repurchase Agreements.The Fund may engage in reverse repurchase agreements. A reverse repurchase agreement is the sale of one or more securities to a counterparty at an agreed-upon purchase price with the simultaneous agreement to repurchase those securities on a future date at a higher repurchase price. The repurchase price represents the repayment of the purchase price and interest accrued thereon over the term of the repurchase agreement. The cash received by the Fund in connection with a reverse repurchase agreement may be used for investment-related purposes such as purchasing portfolio securities or for other purposes such as those described in the preceding “Borrowings” note.
The Fund entered into a Committed Repurchase Transaction Facility (the “Facility”) with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (the “counterparty”) which enables it to participate with certain other Oppenheimer funds in a committed reverse repurchase agreement facility that permits aggregate outstanding reverse repurchase agreements of up to $750 million, collectively. Interest is charged to the Fund on the purchase price of outstanding reverse repurchase agreements at current LIBOR rates plus an applicable spread. The Fund is also allocated itspro-rata share of an annual structuring fee based on the total Facility size and ongoing commitment fees based on the total unused amount of the Facility. The Fund retains the
|
45 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
9. Borrowings and Other Financing (Continued)
economic exposure to fluctuations in the value of securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements under the Facility and therefore these transactions are considered secured borrowings for financial reporting purposes. The Fund also continues to receive the economic benefit of interest payments received on securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements, in the form of a direct payment from the counterparty. These payments are included in interest income on the Statement of Operations. Total fees and interest related to the Fund’s participation in the Facility during the reporting period are included in expenses on the Fund’s Statement of Operations and equal 0.03% of the Fund’s average net assets on an annualized basis.
The securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements under the Facility are valued on a daily basis. To the extent this value, after adjusting for certain margin requirements of the Facility, exceeds the cash proceeds received, the Fund may request the counterparty to return securities equal in margin value to this excess. To the extent that the cash proceeds received exceed the margin value of the securities subject to the transaction, the counterparty may request additional securities from the Fund. The Fund has the right to declare each Wednesday as the repurchase date for any outstanding reverse repurchase agreement upon delivery of advanced notification and may also recall any security subject to such a transaction by substituting eligible securities of equal or greater margin value according to the Facility’s terms.
The Fund executed no transactions under the Facility during the reporting period.
Details of reverse repurchase agreement transactions for the reporting period are as follows:
10. Pending Acquisition
On October 18, 2018, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, an indirect corporate parent of theSub-Adviser and the Manager, announced that it has entered into an agreement whereby Invesco Ltd. (“Invesco”), a global investment management company, will acquire theSub-Adviser (the “Transaction”). In connection with the Transaction, on January 11, 2019, the Fund’s Board unanimously approved an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “Agreement”), which provides for the transfer of the assets and liabilities of the Fund to a corresponding, newly formed fund (the “Acquiring Fund”) in the Invesco family of funds (the “Reorganization”) in exchange for shares of the corresponding Acquiring Fund of equal value to the value of the shares of the Fund as of the close of business on the closing date. Although the Acquiring Fund will be managed by Invesco Advisers, Inc., the Acquiring Fund will, as of the closing date, have the same investment objective and substantially similar principal investment strategies and risks as the Fund. After the Reorganization, Invesco Advisers, Inc. will be the investment adviser to the Acquiring Fund, and the Fund will be liquidated and dissolved under applicable law and terminate its registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The Reorganization is expected to be atax-free reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The Reorganization is subject to the approval of shareholders of the Fund. Shareholders of
|
46 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
10. Pending Acquisition (Continued)
record of the Fund on January 14, 2019 will be entitled to vote on the Reorganization and will receive a combined prospectus and proxy statement describing the Reorganization, the shareholder meeting, and a discussion of the factors the Fund’s Board considered in approving the Agreement. The combined prospectus and proxy statement is expected to be distributed to shareholders of record on or about February 28, 2019. The anticipated date of the shareholder meeting is on or about April 12, 2019.
If shareholders approve the Agreement and certain other closing conditions are satisfied or waived, the Reorganization is expected to close during the second quarter of 2019, or as soon as practicable thereafter. This is subject to change.
11. Subsequent Event
On February 4, 2019, the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico confirmed the Third Amended Title III Plan of Adjustment of Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”). As a result, during February 2019 the Fund received a combination of newly issued COFINA bonds and cash in exchange for legacy COFINA bonds. The resulting impact to the Fund’s net assets was less than 0.50%.
|
47 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
BOARD APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY
ANDSUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTSUnaudited
The Fund has entered into an investment advisory agreement with OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (“OFI Global” or the “Adviser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (“OFI” or the“Sub-Adviser”) (“OFI Global” and “OFI” together the “Managers”) and OFI Global has entered into asub-advisory agreement with OFI whereby OFI provides investmentsub-advisory services to the Fund (collectively, the “Agreements”). Each year, the Board of Trustees (the “Board”), including a majority of the independent Trustees, is required to determine whether to approve the terms of the Agreements and the renewal thereof. The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, requires that the Board request and evaluate, and that the Managers provide, such information as may be reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the Agreements. The Board employs an independent consultant to prepare a report that provides information, including comparative information that the Board requests for that purpose. In addition toin-person meetings focused on this evaluation, the Board receives information throughout the year regarding Fund services, fees, expenses and performance.
The Managers and the independent consultant provided information to the Board on the following factors: (i) the nature, quality and extent of the Managers’ services, (ii) the comparative investment performance of the Fund and the Managers, (iii) the fees and expenses of the Fund, including comparative fee and expense information, (iv) the profitability of the Managers and their affiliates, including an analysis of the cost of providing services, (v) whether economies of scale are realized as the Fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for Fund investors and (vi) other benefits to the Managers from their relationship with the Fund. The Board was aware that there are alternatives to retaining the Managers.
Outlined below is a summary of the principal information considered by the Board as well as the Board’s conclusions.
Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The Board considered information about the nature, quality and extent of the services provided to the Fund and information regarding the Managers’ key personnel who provide such services. The Managers’ duties include providing the Fund with the services of theSub-Adviser’s portfolio manager and investment team, who provide research, analysis and other advisory services in regard to the Fund’s investments; and securities trading services. OFI Global is responsible for oversight of third-party service providers; monitoring compliance with applicable Fund policies and procedures and adherence to the Fund’s investment restrictions; risk management; and oversight of theSub-Adviser. OFI Global is also responsible for providing certain administrative services to the Fund. Those services include providing and supervising all administrative and clerical personnel who are necessary in order to provide effective corporate administration for the Fund; compiling and maintaining records with respect to the Fund’s operations; preparing and filing reports required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; preparing periodic reports regarding the operations of the Fund for its shareholders; preparing proxy materials for shareholder meetings; and preparing the registration statements required by federal and state securities laws for the sale of the Fund’s shares. OFI Global also provides the Fund with office space, facilities and equipment.
|
48 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
The Board also considered the quality of the services provided and the quality of the Managers’ resources that are available to the Fund. The Board took account of the fact that theSub-Adviser has over fifty years of experience as an investment adviser and that its assets under management rank it among the top mutual fund managers in the United States. The Board evaluated the Managers’ advisory, administrative, accounting, legal, compliance and risk management services, among other services, and information the Board has received regarding the experience and professional qualifications of the Managers’ key personnel and the size and functions of their staff. In its evaluation of the quality of the portfolio management services provided, the Board considered the experience of Charles Pulire, the portfolio manager for the Fund, and theSub-Adviser’s investment team and analysts. The Board members also considered the totality of their experiences with the Managers as directors or trustees of the Fund and other funds advised by the Managers. The Board considered information regarding the quality of services provided by affiliates of the Managers, which the Board members have become knowledgeable about through their experiences with the Managers and in connection with the review or renewal of the Fund’s service agreements or service providers. The Board concluded, in light of the Managers’ experience, reputation, personnel, operations and resources that the Fund benefits from the services provided under the Agreements.
Investment Performance of the Managers and the Fund. Throughout the year, the Managers provided information on the investment performance of the Fund, the Adviser and theSub-Adviser, including comparative performance information. The Board also reviewed information, prepared by the Managers and by the independent consultant, comparing the Fund’s historical performance to relevant benchmarks or market indices and to the performance of other retail funds in the muni Pennsylvania category. The Board noted that the Fund’sone-year, three-year, five-year andten-year performance was below its category median.
Fees and Expenses of the Fund. The Board reviewed the fees paid to the Adviser and the other expenses borne by the Fund. The Board noted that the Adviser, not the Fund, pays theSub-Adviser’s fee under thesub-advisory agreement. The independent consultant provided comparative data in regard to the fees and expenses of the Fund and other retailfront-end load muni Pennsylvania funds with comparable asset levels and distribution features. The Board noted that the Fund’s contractual management fee was lower than its peer group and category median. The Board also noted that the Fund’s total expenses were higher than its peer group and category median.
Economies of Scale and Profits Realized by the Managers. The Board considered information regarding the Managers’ costs in serving as the Fund’s investment adviser andsub-adviser, including the costs associated with the personnel and systems necessary to manage the Fund, and information regarding the Managers’ profitability from their relationship with the Fund. The Board also considered that the Managers must be able to pay and retain experienced professional personnel at competitive rates to provide quality services to the Fund. The Board reviewed whether the Managers may realize economies of scale in managing and supporting the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund currently
|
49 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
BOARD APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY
ANDSUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
has management fee breakpoints, which are intended to share with Fund shareholders economies of scale that may exist as the Fund’s assets grow.
Other Benefits to the Managers. In addition to considering the profits realized by the Managers, the Board considered information that was provided regarding the direct and indirect benefits the Managers receive as a result of their relationship with the Fund, including compensation paid to the Managers’ affiliates.
Conclusions. These factors were also considered by the independent Trustees meeting separately from the full Board, assisted by experienced counsel to the Fund and to the independent Trustees. Fund counsel and the independent Trustees’ counsel are independent of the Managers within the meaning and intent of the Securities and Exchange Commission Rules.
Based on its review of the information it received and its evaluations described above, the Board, including a majority of the independent Trustees, decided to continue the Agreements through September 30, 2019. In arriving at its decision, the Board did not identify any factor or factors as being more important than others, but considered all of the above information, and considered the terms and conditions of the Agreements, including the management fees, in light of all the surrounding circumstances.
|
50 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
PORTFOLIO PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND GUIDELINES;
UPDATES TO STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited
The Fund has adopted Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Guidelines under which the Fund votes proxies relating to securities (“portfolio proxies”) held by the Fund. A description of the Fund’s Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Guidelines is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund toll-free at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677), (ii) on the Fund’s website at www.oppenheimerfunds.com, and (iii) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the Fund is required to file FormN-PX, with its complete proxy voting record for the 12 months ended June 30th, no later than August 31st of each year. The Fund’s voting record is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund toll-free at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677), and (ii) in the FormN-PX filing on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first quarter and the third quarter of each fiscal year on FormN-Q. The Fund’s FormN-Q filings are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Beginning in April 2019, the Fund will no longer file FormN-Qs and will instead disclose its portfolio holdings monthly on FormN-PORT, which will also be available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Householding—Delivery of Shareholder Documents
This is to inform you about OppenheimerFunds’ “householding” policy. If more than one member of your household maintains an account in a particular fund, OppenheimerFunds will mail only one copy of the fund’s prospectus (or, if available, the fund’s summary prospectus), annual and semiannual report and privacy policy. The consolidation of these mailings, called householding, benefits your fund through reduced mailing expense, and benefits you by reducing the volume of mail you receive from OppenheimerFunds. Householding does not affect the delivery of your account statements.
Please note that we will continue to household these mailings for as long as you remain an OppenheimerFunds shareholder, unless you request otherwise. If you prefer to receive multiple copies of these materials, please call us at1.800.CALL-OPP(225-5677).You may also notify us in writing or via email. We will begin sending you individual copies of the prospectus (or, if available, the summary prospectus), reports and privacy policy within 30 days of receiving your request to stop householding.
|
51 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
DISTRIBUTION SOURCESUnaudited
For any distribution that took place over the last six months of the Fund’s reporting period, the table below details on aper-share basis the percentage of the Fund’s total distribution payment amount that was derived from the following sources: net income, net profit from the sale of securities, and other capital sources. Other capital sources represent a return of capital. A return of capital may occur, for example, when some or all of the money that you invested in the Fund is paid back to you. A return of capital distribution does not necessarily reflect the Fund’s investment performance and should not be confused with “yield” or “income.” You should not draw any conclusions about the Fund’s investment performance from the amounts of these distributions. This information is based upon income and capital gains using generally accepted accounting principles as of the date of each distribution. If the Fund (or an underlying fund in which the Fund invests) invests in real estate investment trusts (REITs) and/or master limited partnerships (MLPs), the percentages attributed to each category are estimated using historical information because the character of the amounts received from the REITs and/or MLPs in which the Fund (or underlying fund) invests is unknown until after the end of the calendar year. Because the Fund is actively managed, the relative amount of the Fund’s total distributions derived from various sources over the calendar year may change. Please note that this information should not be used for tax reporting purposes as the tax character of distributable income may differ from the amounts used for this notification. You will receive IRS tax forms in the first quarter of each calendar year detailing the actual amount of the taxable andnon-taxable portion of distributions paid to you during the tax year.
For the most current information, please go to oppenheimerfunds.com. Select your Fund, and scroll down to the ‘Dividends’ table under ‘Analytics’.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fund Name | | Pay Date | | | Net Income | | | Net Profit from Sale | | | Other Capital Sources | |
| |
Oppenheimer Rochester Pennsylvania Municipal Fund | | | 9/25/18 | | | | 90.7% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 9.3% | |
| |
Oppenheimer Rochester Pennsylvania Municipal Fund | | | 10/23/18 | | | | 88.8% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 11.2% | |
| |
Oppenheimer Rochester Pennsylvania Municipal Fund | | | 12/31/18 | | | | 93.2% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 6.8% | |
| |
Oppenheimer Rochester Pennsylvania Municipal Fund | | | 1/22/19 | | | | 75.7% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 24.3% | |
| |
|
52 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND
| | |
Trustees and Officers | | Joel W. Motley, Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Trustee |
| | Beth Ann Brown, Trustee |
| | Edmund P. Giambastiani, Jr., Trustee |
| | Elizabeth Krentzman, Trustee |
| | Mary F. Miller, Trustee |
| | Joanne Pace, Trustee |
| | Daniel Vandivort, Trustee |
| | Brian F. Wruble, Trustee |
| | Arthur P. Steinmetz, Trustee, President and Principal Executive Officer |
| | Scott S. Cottier, Vice President |
| | Troy E. Willis, Vice President |
| | Mark R. DeMitry, Vice President |
| | Michael L. Camarella, Vice President |
| | Charles S. Pulire, Vice President |
| | Elizabeth Mossow, Vice President |
| | Richard Stein, Vice President |
| | Cynthia Lo Bessette, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer |
| | Jennifer Foxson, Vice President and Chief Business Officer |
| | Mary Ann Picciotto, Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Anti-Money |
| | Laundering Officer |
| | Brian S. Petersen, Treasurer and Principal Financial & Accounting Officer |
| |
Manager | | OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. |
| |
Sub-Adviser | | OppenheimerFunds, Inc. |
| |
Distributor | | OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. |
| |
Transfer and Shareholder | | OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. |
Servicing Agent | | |
| |
Sub-Transfer Agent | | Shareholder Services, Inc. |
| | DBA OppenheimerFunds Services |
| |
Independent Registered | | KPMG LLP |
Public Accounting Firm | | |
| |
Legal Counsel | | Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP |
| |
| | The financial statements included herein have been taken from the records of the Fund without examination of those records by the independent registered public accounting firm. |
© 2019 OppenheimerFunds, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
53 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
PRIVACY NOTICE
As an Oppenheimer fund shareholder, you are entitled to know how we protect your personal information and how we limit its disclosure.
Information Sources
We obtainnon-public personal information about our shareholders from the following sources:
● | | Applications or other forms. |
● | | When you create a user ID and password for online account access. |
● | | When you enroll in eDocs Direct,SM our electronic document delivery service. |
● | | Your transactions with us, our affiliates or others. |
● | | Technologies on our website, including: “cookies” and web beacons, which are used to collect data on the pages you visit and the features you use. |
If you visit oppenheimerfunds.com and do not log on to the secure account information areas, we do not obtain any personal information about you. When you do log on to a secure area, we do obtain your user ID and password to identify you. We also use this information to provide you with products and services you have requested, to inform you about products and services that you may be interested in and assist you in other ways.
We do not collect personal information through our website unless you willingly provide it to us, either directly by email or in those areas of the website that request information. In order to update your personal information (including your mailing address, email address and phone number) you must first log on and visit your user profile.
If you have set your browser to warn you before accepting cookies, you will receive the warning message with each cookie. You can refuse cookies by turning them off in your browser. However, doing so may limit your access to certain sections of our website.
We use cookies to help us improve and manage our website. For example, cookies help us recognize new versus repeat visitors to the site, track the pages visited, and enable some special features on the website. This data helps us provide better service for our website visitors.
Protection of Information
We do not disclose anynon-public personal information (such as names on a customer list) about current or former customers to anyone, except as permitted by law.
Disclosure of Information
Copies of confirmations, account statements and other documents reporting activity in your fund accounts are made available to your financial advisor (as designated by you). We may also use details about you and your investments to help us, our financial service affiliates, or firms that jointly market their financial products and services with ours, to better serve your investment needs or suggest educational material that may be of interest to you. If this requires us to provide you with an opportunity to “opt in” or “opt out” of such information sharing with a firm not affiliated with us, you will receive notification on how to do so, before any such sharing takes place.
Right of Refusal
We will not disclose your personal information to unaffiliated third parties (except as permitted by law), unless we first offer you a reasonable opportunity to refuse or “opt out” of such disclosure.
|
54 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
Internet Security and Encryption
In general, the email services provided by our website are encrypted and provide a secure and private means of communication with us. To protect your own privacy, confidential and/ or personal information should only be communicated via email when you are advised that you are using a secure website.
As a security measure, we do not include personal or account information innon-secure emails, and we advise you not to send such information to us innon-secure emails. Instead, you may take advantage of the secure features of our website to encrypt your email correspondence. To do this, you will need to use a browser that supports Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol.
● | | All transactions conducted via our websites, including redemptions, exchanges and purchases, are secured by the highest encryption standards available. SSL is used to establish a secure connection between your PC and OppenheimerFunds’ server. It transmits information in an encrypted and scrambled format. |
● | | Encryption is achieved through an electronic scrambling technology that uses a “key” to code and then decode the data. Encryption acts like the cable converter box you may have on your television set. It scrambles data with a secret code so that no one can make sense of it while it is being transmitted. When the data reaches its destination, the same software unscrambles the data. |
● | | You can exit the secure area by closing your browser or, for added security, you can use the Log Out button before you close your browser. |
Other Security Measures
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your personal account information. Our employees and agents have access to that information only so that they may offer you products or provide services, for example, when responding to your account questions.
How You Can Help
You can also do your part to keep your account information private and to prevent unauthorized transactions. If you obtain a user ID and password for your account, safeguard that information. Strengthening your online credentials–your online security profile–typically your user name, password, and security questions and answers, can be one of your most important lines of defense on the Internet. For additional information on how you can help prevent identity theft, visit https://www. oppenheimerfunds.com/security.
Who We Are
This joint notice describes the privacy policies of the Oppenheimer funds, OppenheimerFunds, Inc., each of its investment adviser subsidiaries, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. and OFI Global Trust Co. It applies to all Oppenheimer fund accounts you presently have, or may open in the future, using your Social Security number—whether or not you remain a shareholder of our funds. This notice was last updated as of November 2017. In the event it is updated or changed, we will post an updated notice on our website at oppenheimerfunds.com. If you have any questions about this privacy policy, email us by clicking on theContact Us section of our website at oppenheimerfunds.com, write to us at P.O. Box 5270, Denver, CO 80217-5270, or call us at800 CALL OPP (225 5677).
|
55 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-19-099391/g666141g41o86.jpg)
Visit us at oppenheimerfunds.com for24-hr access to
account information and transactions or call us at 800.CALL
OPP (800.225.5677) for24-hr automated information and
automated transactions. Representatives also available
Mon–Fri8am-8pm ET.
| | |
Visit Us oppenheimerfunds.com Call Us 800 225 5677 | | |
Follow Us ![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-19-099391/g666141g40u27.jpg)
| | Oppenheimer funds are distributed by OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. 225 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10281-1008 © 2019 OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. All rights reserved. RS0740.001.0119 March 25, 2019 |
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-19-099391/g700677page001.jpg)
Important Updates
On October 18, 2018, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, an indirect corporate parent of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. and its subsidiaries OFI Global Asset Management, Inc., OFI SteelPath, Inc. and OFI Advisors, LLC, announced that it has entered into an agreement whereby Invesco Ltd., a global investment management company, will acquire OppenheimerFunds, Inc. As of the date of this report, the transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2019, pending necessary regulatory and other third-party approvals. This is subject to change. See the Notes to Financial Statements for more information.
Update to Shareholder Report Document Delivery
Beginning January 1, 2021, OppenheimerFunds will send a notice, either by mail or email, each time your fund’s updated report is available on our website (oppenheimerfunds.com). Investors who are not enrolled in electronic delivery by January 1, 2021 will receive the notice in the mail. Enrolling in electronic delivery will enable you to receive a direct link to your full shareholder report the moment it becomes available, and limit the amount of mail you receive. All investors who prefer to receive shareholder reports in paper may, at any time, choose that option.
How do you update your delivery preferences?
If you own these shares through a financial intermediary, you may contact your financial intermediary.
If your accounts are held through OppenheimerFunds and you receive statements, confirms, and other documents directly from us, you can enroll in our eDocs DirectSM service atoppenheimerfunds.com or by calling us. Once you’re enrolled, you’ll begin to receive email notifications of updated documents when they become available. If you have any questions, feel free to call us at1.800.225.5677.
Table of Contents
Class A Shares
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS AT 1/31/19
| | | | | | |
| | Class A Shares of the Fund | | |
| | Without Sales Charge | | With Sales Charge | | Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Index |
6-Month | | 1.36% | | -3.46% | | 2.05% |
1-Year | | 9.40 | | 4.20 | | 3.26 |
5-Year | | 7.65 | | 6.60 | | 3.57 |
10-Year | | 10.15 | | 9.61 | | 4.55 |
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Fund returns include changes in share price, reinvested distributions, and a 4.75% maximum applicable sales charge except where “without sales charge” is indicated. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized. Returns do not consider capital gains or income taxes on an individual’s investment. For performance data current to the most recentmonth-end, visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). See Fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses for more information on share classes and sales charges.
Our Twitter handle is @RochesterFunds.
|
3 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
Top Holdings and Allocations
TOP TEN CATEGORIES
| | | | |
Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement | | | 16.3 | % |
Sales Tax Revenue | | | 7.6 | |
General Obligation | | | 7.4 | |
Education | | | 6.5 | |
Adult Living Facilities | | | 6.4 | |
Special Assessment | | | 5.2 | |
Marine/Aviation Facilities | | | 5.0 | |
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) | | | 4.7 | |
Sewer Utilities | | | 4.6 | |
Hospital/Healthcare | | | 4.4 | |
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of January 31, 2019 and are based on total assets.
CREDIT ALLOCATION
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | NRSRO- Rated | | | Sub- Adviser- Rated | | | Total | |
AAA | | | 5.0% | | | | 2.3% | | | | 7.3% | |
AA | | | 19.5 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 19.7 | |
A | | | 7.2 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 7.2 | |
BBB | | | 10.9 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 13.5 | |
BB or lower | | | 22.0 | | | | 30.3 | | | | 52.3 | |
Total | | | 64.6% | | | | 35.4% | | | | 100.0% | |
The percentages above are based on the market value of the securities as of January 31, 2019 and are subject to change. OppenheimerFunds, Inc. determines the credit allocation of the Fund’s assets using ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs), such as S&P Global Ratings (S&P). For any security rated by an NRSRO other than S&P, thesub-adviser, OppenheimerFunds, Inc., converts that security’s rating to the equivalent S&P rating. If two or more NRSROs have assigned a rating to a security, the highest rating is used. For securities not rated by an NRSRO, thesub-adviser uses its own credit analysis to assign ratings in categories similar to those of S&P. The use of similar categories is not an indication that thesub-adviser’s credit analysis process is consistent or comparable with any NRSRO’s process were that NRSRO to rate the same security.
For the purposes of this Credit Allocation table, securities rated within the NRSROs’ four highest categories – AAA, AA, A, and BBB – are investment-grade securities. For further details, please consult the Fund’s prospectus or Statement of Additional Information.
For more current Fund holdings, please visit oppenheimerfunds.com.
|
4 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
Performance
DISTRIBUTION YIELDS
As of 1/31/19
| | | | |
| | Without Sales Charge | | With Sales Charge |
Class A | | 4.63% | | 4.41% |
Class C | | 4.17 | | N/A |
Class Y | | 4.81 | | N/A |
TAXABLE EQUIVALENT YIELDS
| | | | |
As of 1/31/19 |
Class A | | 5.41% | | |
Class C | | 4.63 | | |
Class Y | | 6.06 | | |
STANDARDIZED YIELDS
| | | | |
For the 30 Days Ended 1/31/19 |
Class A | | 3.41% | | |
Class C | | 2.92 | | |
Class Y | | 3.82 | | |
UNSUBSIDIZED STANDARDIZED YIELDS
| | | | |
For the 30 Days Ended 1/31/19 |
Class A | | 3.40% | | |
Class C | | 2.91 | | |
Class Y | | 3.81 | | |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS WITHOUT SALES CHARGE AS OF 1/31/19
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Inception Date | | 6-Month | | 1-Year | | 5-Year | | 10-Year | | Since Inception |
Class A (ORNAX) | | 10/1/93 | | 1.36% | | 9.40% | | 7.65% | | 10.15% | | 4.71% |
Class C (ORNCX) | | 8/29/95 | | 1.04 | | 8.73 | | 6.89 | | 9.34 | | 4.02 |
Class Y (ORNYX) | | 11/29/10 | | 1.63 | | 9.83 | | 7.88 | | N/A | | 7.61 |
|
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS WITH SALES CHARGE AS OF 1/31/19 |
| | Inception Date | | 6-Month | | 1-Year | | 5-Year | | 10-Year | | Since Inception |
Class A (ORNAX) | | 10/1/93 | | -3.46% | | 4.20% | | 6.60% | | 9.61% | | 4.51% |
Class C (ORNCX) | | 8/29/95 | | 0.05 | | 7.73 | | 6.89 | | 9.34 | | 4.02 |
Class Y (ORNYX) | | 11/29/10 | | 1.63 | | 9.83 | | 7.88 | | N/A | | 7.61 |
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized. Returns do not consider capital gains or income taxes on an individual’s investments. For performance data current to the most recentmonth-end, visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). Fund returns include changes in share price, reinvested distributions, and the applicable sales charge: for Class A shares, the current maximum initial sales charge of 4.75% and for Class C, the contingent deferred sales charge of 1% for the1-year period. There is no sales charge for Class Y shares.
The Fund’s performance is compared to the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Index, an index of a broad range of investment-grade municipal bonds that measures the performance of the general municipal bond market. The index is unmanaged and cannot be purchased directly by investors. While index comparisons may be useful to provide a benchmark for the Fund’s performance, it must be noted that the Fund’s investments are not limited to the investments comprising the index. Index performance includes reinvestment of
|
5 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
income, but does not reflect transaction costs, fees, expenses, or taxes. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only as a benchmark for the Fund’s performance, and does not predict or depict performance of the Fund. The Fund’s performance reflects the effects of the Fund’s business and operating expenses.
Distribution yields for Class A shares are based on dividends of $0.028 for the22-day accrual period ended January 22, 2019. The yield without sales charge for Class A shares is calculated by dividing annualized dividends by the Class A net asset value (NAV) on January 22, 2019; for the yield with charge, the denominator is the Class A maximum offering price on that date. Distribution yields for Class C and Y are annualized based on dividends of $0.0252 and $0.0291, respectively, for the22-day accrual period ended January 22, 2019 and on the corresponding net asset values on that date.
Standardized yield is based on anSEC-standardized formula designed to approximate the Fund’s annualized hypothetical current income from securities less expenses for the30-day period ended January 31, 2019 and that date’s maximum offering price (for Class A shares) or net asset value (for all other share classes). Each result is compounded semiannually and annualized. Falling share prices artificially increase yields. The unsubsidized standardized yield is computed under anSEC-standardized formula based on net income earned for the30-day period ended January 31, 2019. The calculation excludes any expense reimbursements and thus may result in a lower yield.
Taxable equivalent yield is based on the standardized yield and the 2018 top federal 40.8%. Calculations factor in the 3.8% tax on unearned income under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as applicable. A portion of the Fund’s distributions may be subject to tax; distributions may also increase an investor’s exposure to the alternative minimum tax. Capital gains distributions are taxable as capital gains. Tax treatments of the Fund’s distributions and capital gains may vary by state; investors should consult a tax advisor to determine if the Fund is appropriate for them. Each result is compounded semiannually and annualized. Falling share prices artificially increase yields.This Report must be preceded or accompanied by a Fund prospectus.
Investments in “tobacco bonds,” which are backed by the proceeds a state or territory receives from the 1998 national litigation settlement with tobacco manufacturers, may be vulnerable to economic and/or legislative events that affect issuers in a particular municipal market sector. Annual payments byMSA-participating manufacturers, for example, hinge on many factors, including annual domestic cigarette shipments, inflation and the relative market share ofnon-participating manufacturers. To date, we believe consumption figures remain within an acceptable range of the assumptions used to structure MSA bonds. Future MSA payments could be reduced if consumption were to fall more rapidly than originally forecast.
Before investing in any of the Oppenheimer funds, investors should carefully consider a fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses contain this and other information about the funds, and may be obtained by asking your financial advisor, visiting oppenheimerfunds.com, or calling 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). Read prospectuses and summary prospectuses carefully before investing.
Shares of Oppenheimer funds are not deposits or obligations of any bank, are not guaranteed by any bank, are not insured by the FDIC or any other agency
|
6 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
and involve investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested.
|
7 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
Fund Expenses
Fund Expenses. As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, which may include sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and/or contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service fees; and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The examples are based on an investment of $1,000.00 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire6-month period ended January 31, 2019.
Actual Expenses. The first section of the table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section for the class of shares you hold, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expense that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000.00 (for example, an $8,600.00 account value divided by $1,000.00 = 8.60), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During 6 Months Ended January 31, 2019” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes.The second section of the table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio for each class of shares, and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year for each class before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example for the class of shares you hold with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such asfront-end or contingent deferred sales charges (loads). Therefore, the “hypothetical” section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
|
8 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | |
Actual | | Beginning Account Value August 1, 2018 | | Ending Account Value January 31, 2019 | | Expenses Paid During 6 Months Ended January 31, 2019 | | |
Class A | | $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,013.60 | | $ 6.57 | | |
Class C | | 1,000.00 | | 1,010.40 | | 9.88 | | |
Class Y | | 1,000.00 | | 1,016.30 | | 5.30 | | |
| | | |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | | | | | | |
Class A | | 1,000.00 | | 1,018.70 | | 6.58 | | |
Class C | | 1,000.00 | | 1,015.43 | | 9.90 | | |
Class Y | | 1,000.00 | | 1,019.96 | | 5.31 | | |
Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio for that class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect theone-half year period). Those annualized expense ratios, excluding indirect expenses from affiliated funds, based on the6-month period ended January 31, 2019 are as follows:
| | | | |
Class | | Expense Ratios | |
Class A | | | 1.29 | % |
Class C | | | 1.94 | |
Class Y | | | 1.04 | |
|
9 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSJanuary 31, 2019 Unaudited
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes—114.8% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alabama—5.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$5,000,000 | | AL Economic Settlement Authority (BP Exploration & Production)1 | | | 4.000 | % | | | 09/15/2033 | | | $ | 5,196,200 | |
2,710,000 | | AL Port Authority (Alabama Docks Dept.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2028 | | | | 3,136,147 | |
2,380,000 | | AL Port Authority (Alabama Docks Dept.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2029 | | | | 2,738,547 | |
1,700,000 | | Birmingham, AL GO Warrants1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2036 | | | | 1,962,735 | |
1,535,000 | | Birmingham, AL GO Warrants1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 1,764,191 | |
1,575,000 | | Birmingham, AL GO Warrants1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 1,803,312 | |
5,190,000 | | Birmingham, AL GO Warrants1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2043 | | | | 5,875,184 | |
3,140,000 | | Birmingham-Jefferson, AL Civic Center Authority1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2043 | | | | 3,169,359 | |
1,365,000 | | Birmingham-Jefferson, AL Civic Center Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2035 | | | | 1,573,149 | |
1,170,000 | | Birmingham-Jefferson, AL Civic Center Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 1,342,329 | |
12,870,000 | | Birmingham-Jefferson, AL Civic Center Authority2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2048 | | | | 14,432,537 | |
18,120,000 | | Birmingham-Jefferson, AL Civic Center Authority2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 20,122,758 | |
10,500,000 | | Birmingham-Jefferson, AL Civic Center Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 11,660,565 | |
4,500,000 | | Homewood, AL Educational Building Authority (Samford University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 4,932,540 | |
21,895,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 10/01/2039 | | | | 19,274,387 | |
20,045,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 10/01/2046 | | | | 17,799,760 | |
30,000,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 10/01/2046 | | | | 26,253,000 | |
17,500,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 10/01/2050 | | | | 15,539,825 | |
44,050,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 10/01/2050 | | | | 38,495,295 | |
5,000,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 10/01/2053 | | | | 5,514,400 | |
51,500,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 10/01/2053 | | | | 60,300,320 | |
25,000,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 10/01/2051 | | | | 29,829,250 | |
8,000,000 | | Lower AL Gas District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2046 | | | | 9,358,400 | |
500,000 | | Mobile, AL Improvement District (McGowin Park)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 08/01/2030 | | | | 506,480 | |
1,300,000 | | Mobile, AL Improvement District (McGowin Park)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 1,314,781 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 303,895,451 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alaska—0.3% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,650,000 | | AK Industrial Devel. & Export Authority Community Provider (Boys & Girls Home)4,5 | | | 5.875 | | | | 12/01/2027 | | | | 82,500 | |
500,000 | | AK Industrial Devel. & Export Authority Community Provider (Boys & Girls Home)4,5 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2036 | | | | 25,000 | |
1,755,000 | | AK Municipal Bond Bank Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2030 | | | | 1,988,959 | |
1,365,000 | | AK Municipal Bond Bank Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2031 | | | | 1,537,864 | |
1,960,000 | | AK Municipal Bond Bank Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 2,198,101 | |
2,055,000 | | AK Municipal Bond Bank Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2033 | | | | 2,298,620 | |
10,350,000 | | Koyukuk, AK (Tanana Chiefs Conference Health Care Facility)1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 10/01/2041 | | | | 10,754,374 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 18,885,418 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Arizona—2.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,165,000 | | AZ IDA (Academies of Mathematics & Science)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 1,183,593 | |
2,250,000 | | AZ IDA (Academies of Mathematics & Science)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 2,280,667 | |
3,500,000 | | AZ IDA (Academies of Mathematics & Science)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2053 | | | | 3,553,060 | |
2,515,000 | | AZ IDA (Accel Schools)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 08/01/2038 | | | | 2,470,887 | |
3,945,000 | | AZ IDA (Accel Schools)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 08/01/2048 | | | | 3,858,171 | |
|
10 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Arizona (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$580,000 | | AZ IDA (Franklin Phonetic Charter School)1 | | | 5.500 | % | | | 07/01/2037 | | | $ | 569,438 | |
680,000 | | AZ IDA (Franklin Phonetic Charter School)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 669,671 | |
645,000 | | AZ IDA (Franklin Phonetic Charter School)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 07/01/2052 | | | | 637,054 | |
1,415,000 | | AZ IDA (Mater Academy of Nevada)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 12/15/2038 | | | | 1,417,618 | |
2,260,000 | | AZ IDA (Mater Academy of Nevada)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/15/2048 | | | | 2,274,170 | |
3,402,000 | | Buckeye, AZ Watson Road Community Facilities District | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 3,178,693 | |
3,180,000 | | East San Luis, AZ Community Facilities District Special Assessment (Area One)4,5 | | | 6.375 | | | | 01/01/2028 | | | | 1,812,600 | |
140,000 | | East San Luis, AZ Community Facilities District Special Assessment (Area Two)4,5 | | | 8.500 | | | | 01/01/2028 | | | | 70,000 | |
2,500,000 | | Glendale, AZ IDA (Beatitudes Campus)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2045 | | | | 2,467,100 | |
500,000 | | La Paz County, AZ IDA (Harmony Public Schools)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2038 | | | | 533,670 | |
1,200,000 | | La Paz County, AZ IDA (Harmony Public Schools)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2048 | | | | 1,261,380 | |
7,225,000 | | Maricopa County, AZ IDA (Christian Care Surprise) | | | 6.000 | | | | 01/01/2048 | | | | 7,274,202 | |
220,000 | | Maricopa County, AZ IDA (Greathearts Arizona)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 248,783 | |
405,000 | | Maricopa County, AZ IDA (Greathearts Arizona)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 447,667 | |
1,870,000 | | Maricopa County, AZ IDA (Immanuel Campus Care)4,5 | | | 8.500 | | | | 04/20/2041 | | | | 1,290,300 | |
294,000 | | Merrill Ranch, AZ Community Facilities District No. 1 Special Assessment Lien1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 294,347 | |
810,000 | | Merrill Ranch, AZ Community Facilities District No. 21 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/15/2040 | | | | 880,616 | |
262,000 | | Merrill Ranch, AZ Community Facilities District No. 2 Special Assessment Lien1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 262,309 | |
641,000 | | Merrill Ranch, AZ Community Facilities District No. 2 Special Assessment Lien1 | | | 5.300 | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 641,570 | |
420,000 | | Parkway, AZ Community Facilities District No. 1 (Prescott Valley) | | | 5.300 | | | | 07/15/2025 | | | | 386,299 | |
350,000 | | Parkway, AZ Community Facilities District No. 1 (Prescott Valley) | | | 5.350 | | | | 07/15/2031 | | | | 298,368 | |
10,000,000 | | Phoenix, AZ Civic Improvement Corp. Airport1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 11,176,300 | |
1,000,000 | | Phoenix, AZ IDA (Downtown Phoenix Student Hsg.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 1,068,020 | |
1,650,000 | | Phoenix, AZ IDA (Espiritu Community Devel. Corp.) | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 1,649,983 | |
4,135,000 | | Phoenix, AZ IDA (Freedom Academy)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2046 | | | | 4,210,257 | |
1,855,000 | | Phoenix, AZ IDA (Gourmet Boutique West)5 | | | 5.875 | | | | 11/01/2037 | | | | 1,458,160 | |
5,530,000 | | Phoenix, AZ IDA (Milestone Charter School) | | | 6.500 | | | | 11/01/2047 | | | | 5,214,901 | |
1,185,000 | | Phoenix, AZ IDA (Vista College Preparatory)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 1,306,415 | |
2,970,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (American Leadership Academy)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2052 | | | | 2,822,153 | |
1,550,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (Christian Care Tucson)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2037 | | | | 1,695,219 | |
2,830,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (Christian Care Tucson)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 3,064,777 | |
2,400,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (Excalibur Charter School)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 09/01/2046 | | | | 2,379,696 | |
2,955,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (New Plan Learning/OG Ohio/250 Shoup Mill Obligated Group)1 | | | 8.125 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 2,959,403 | |
3,315,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (P.L.C. Charter Schools)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2036 | | | | 3,429,600 | |
|
11 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Arizona (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$6,310,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (P.L.C. Charter Schools)1 | | | 6.000 | % | | | 12/01/2046 | | | $ | 6,447,558 | |
5,730,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (P.L.C. Charter Schools)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 04/01/2041 | | | | 6,722,436 | |
1,025,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (Paideia Academies)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,031,427 | |
3,310,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (Paideia Academies)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 07/01/2045 | | | | 3,286,201 | |
500,000 | | Pinal County, AZ IDA (San Manuel Facility)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 06/01/2026 | | | | 512,000 | |
20,000,000 | | Pinal County, AZ IDA (WOF SW GGP 1) | | | 7.250 | | | | 10/01/2033 | | | | 19,899,378 | |
1,022,000 | | Prescott Valley, AZ Southside Community Facilities District No. 1 | | | 7.250 | | | | 07/01/2032 | | | | 605,290 | |
245,000 | | Show Low Bluff, AZ Community Facilities District | | | 5.600 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 217,219 | |
1,010,000 | | Tempe, AZ IDA (Mirabella at ASU)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 10/01/2037 | | | | 1,094,224 | |
2,360,000 | | Tempe, AZ IDA (Mirabella at ASU)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 10/01/2052 | | | | 2,535,985 | |
695,000 | | Tempe, AZ IDA (Tempe Life Care Village)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 731,168 | |
1,550,000 | | Tempe, AZ IDA (Tempe Life Care Village)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 12/01/2042 | | | | 1,632,863 | |
675,000 | | Verrado, AZ Community Facilities District No. 11 | | | 5.700 | | | | 07/15/2029 | | | | 706,745 | |
1,800,000 | | Verrado, AZ Community Facilities District No. 11 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/15/2027 | | | | 1,916,622 | |
610,000 | | Verrado, AZ Community Facilities District No. 11 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/15/2033 | | | | 639,231 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 130,675,464 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Arkansas—0.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5,220,000 | | Cave Springs, AR Municipal Property (Creeks Special Sewer District)4,5 | | | 6.250 | | | | 02/01/2038 | | | | 3,810,600 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
California—13.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2,500,000 | | Adelanto, CA Public Utility Authority1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 2,552,850 | |
7,300,000 | | Alameda, CA Corridor Transportation Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2034 | | | | 8,324,263 | |
750,000 | | Alhambra, CA (Atherton Baptist Homes)1 | | | 7.625 | | | | 01/01/2040 | | | | 790,785 | |
50,000 | | Beaumont, CA Financing Authority, Series C1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2022 | | | | 50,053 | |
180,000 | | Blythe, CA Redevel. Agency (Redevel. Project No. 1 Tax Allocation)1 | | | 6.200 | | | | 05/01/2031 | | | | 180,032 | |
5,500,000 | | Brea, CA Community Facilities District (Brea Plaza Area)1 | | | 7.375 | | | | 09/01/2039 | | | | 5,674,845 | |
127,310,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency | | | 5.307 | 6 | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 22,169,763 | |
107,400,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency | | | 5.502 | 6 | | | 06/01/2050 | | | | 9,802,398 | |
212,950,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency | | | 6.341 | 6 | | | 06/01/2055 | | | | 9,623,210 | |
33,920,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency | | | 6.647 | 6 | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 4,657,555 | |
215,100,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency | | | 6.998 | 6 | | | 06/01/2055 | | | | 11,213,163 | |
7,165,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency | | | 8.145 | 6 | | | 06/01/2033 | | | | 3,172,805 | |
7,000,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC) | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 6,857,130 | |
275,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 06/01/2033 | | | | 278,965 | |
520,920,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC) | | | 5.559 | 6 | | | 06/01/2050 | | | | 66,709,015 | |
18,500,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC)1 | | | 5.650 | 3 | | | 06/01/2041 | | | | 18,507,955 | |
18,030,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC)1 | | | 5.700 | 3 | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 18,035,048 | |
2,775,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 06/01/2035 | | | | 2,802,750 | |
7,285,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 06/01/2043 | | | | 7,387,500 | |
19,120,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/01/2042 | | | | 19,301,066 | |
5,000,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 06/01/2038 | | | | 4,924,400 | |
9,125,000 | | CA Enterprise Devel. Authority (Sunpower Corp.) | | | 8.500 | | | | 04/01/2031 | | | | 9,575,410 | |
16,780,000 | | CA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/01/2033 | | | | 18,209,153 | |
24,160,000 | | CA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/01/2034 | | | | 26,101,256 | |
|
12 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
California (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$20,000,000 | | CA GO1 | | | 4.000 | % | | | 11/01/2035 | | | $ | 21,495,200 | |
3,740,000 | | CA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2030 | | | | 4,482,988 | |
2,160,000 | | CA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2031 | | | | 2,530,505 | |
555,000 | | CA Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. (TASC)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2029 | | | | 628,782 | |
5,350,000 | | CA Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. (TASC)1 | | | 5.300 | 3 | | | 06/01/2037 | | | | 5,351,070 | |
30,420,000 | | CA Health Facilities Financing Authority (SJHS/ SJHCN/SJHE/SJHO Obligated Group)2 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 30,925,024 | |
1,835,000 | | CA Independent Cities Finance Authority Mobile Home Park (Lamplighter Salinas)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/15/2050 | | | | 1,912,694 | |
10,000,000 | | CA Infrastructure and Economic Devel. (SanfordConsortium)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2040 | | | | 10,448,050 | |
1,710,000 | | CA Infrastructure and Economic Devel. (University of California)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2052 | | | | 1,936,301 | |
4,500,000 | | CA Morongo Band of Mission Indians1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2042 | | | | 4,617,630 | |
5,000,000 | | CA Municipal Finance Authority (CHCC/FCHMC Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2047 | | | | 5,431,750 | |
750,000 | | CA Municipal Finance Authority (Harbor Regional Center)1 | | | 8.500 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 787,628 | |
10,800,000 | | CA Municipal Finance Authority (Lax Integrated Express Solutions)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/31/2043 | | | | 11,798,676 | |
2,750,000 | | CA Municipal Finance Authority (Lax Integrated Express Solutions)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/31/2047 | | | | 2,992,935 | |
2,575,000 | | CA Municipal Finance Authority (Lax Integrated Express Solutions)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2048 | | | | 2,798,716 | |
3,000,000 | | CA Pollution Control Financing Authority (Aemerge Redpak Services Southern CA) | | | 8.000 | | | | 12/01/2027 | | | | 2,960,430 | |
6,075,000 | | CA Pollution Control Financing Authority (Calplant I) | | | 7.500 | | | | 07/01/2032 | | | | 6,297,467 | |
14,995,000 | | CA Pollution Control Financing Authority (Calplant I) | | | 8.000 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 16,022,757 | |
55,000 | | CA Public Works1 | | | 6.625 | | | | 11/01/2034 | | | | 55,255 | |
5,945,000 | | CA School Finance Authority Charter School (Grimmway Schools)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2051 | | | | 6,021,096 | |
385,000 | | CA School Finance Authority Charter School (Kepler Neighborhood School) | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2027 | | | | 364,768 | |
900,000 | | CA School Finance Authority Charter School (Kepler Neighborhood School) | | | 5.750 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 841,131 | |
1,230,000 | | CA School Finance Authority Charter School (Kepler Neighborhood School) | | | 5.875 | | | | 05/01/2047 | | | | 1,128,045 | |
595,000 | | CA School Finance Authority Charter School (RE/ REW/RLSA/RDP/RRCP/RSCP/RNNE/RMS/RSSPA/ RBM/RSA Obligated Group) | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 609,369 | |
665,000 | | CA School Finance Authority Charter School (RE/ REW/RLSA/RDP/RRCP/RSCP/RNNE/RMS/RSSPA/ RBM/RSA Obligated Group) | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/01/2052 | | | | 682,011 | |
4,330,000 | | CA School Finance Authority School Facility (Escuela Popular Del Pueblo) | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2050 | | | | 4,238,940 | |
|
13 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
California (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$61,600,000 | | CA Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority | | | 8.146 | %6 | | | 06/01/2056 | | | $ | 4,410,560 | |
58,990,000 | | CA Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority | | | 8.898 | 6 | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 10,152,179 | |
60,785,000 | | CA Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority | | | 8.995 | 6 | | | 06/01/2036 | | | | 21,716,657 | |
13,505,000 | | CA Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority | | | 8.998 | 6 | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 2,111,372 | |
25,920,000 | | CA State University1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2047 | | | | 29,395,872 | |
10,000 | | CA Statewide CDA (Escrow Term)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 09/01/2037 | | | | 10,009 | |
4,020,000 | | CA Statewide CDA (Guidance Charter School)4,5 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,567,800 | |
14,690,000 | | CA Statewide CDA (Guidance Charter School)4,5 | | | 6.750 | | | | 07/01/2052 | | | | 5,729,100 | |
2,019,578 | | CA Statewide CDA (Microgy Holdings)4,5 | | | 9.000 | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 20 | |
1,450,000 | | CA Statewide CDA (NCCD-Hooper Street - College of the Arts)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2052 | | | | 1,516,207 | |
7,775,000 | | CA Statewide CDA (Yucaipa Valley Water Reservoir) | | | 6.000 | | | | 09/02/2044 | | | | 7,561,499 | |
4,515,000 | | CA Statewide Financing Authority Tobacco Settlement (TASC)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 4,545,431 | |
100,000 | | CA Statewide Financing Authority Tobacco Settlement (TASC)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2043 | | | | 100,564 | |
1,120,000 | | CA Statewide Financing Authority Tobacco Settlement (TASC)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2043 | | | | 1,126,317 | |
2,500,000 | | Calexico, CA Community Redevel. Agency Tax Allocation (Central Business District & Residential Redevel.)1 | | | 7.250 | | | | 08/01/2033 | | | | 2,775,525 | |
1,440,000 | | Coyote Canyon, CA Public Facilities Community Facilities DistrictNo. 2004-11 | | | 6.625 | | | | 09/01/2039 | | | | 1,481,645 | |
1,215,000 | | Desert Hot Springs, CA Redevel. Agency Tax Allocation1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2030 | | | | 1,434,745 | |
18,275,000 | | Fremont, CA Union High School District2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2043 | | | | 18,697,542 | |
7,780,000 | | Fresno, CA Unified School District | | | 4.319 | 6 | | | 08/01/2042 | | | | 3,005,492 | |
1,175,000 | | Lathrop, CA Special Tax Community Facilities DistrictNo. 03-21 | | | 7.000 | | | | 09/01/2033 | | | | 1,178,149 | |
4,000,000 | | Long Beach, CA Harbor Revenue1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2043 | | | | 4,485,920 | |
1,625,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Community Facilities District Special Tax (Legends at Cascades)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 09/01/2040 | | | | 1,662,164 | |
1,500,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Airports (Los Angeles International Airport)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2033 | | | | 1,704,285 | |
1,000,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Airports (Los Angeles International Airport)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2035 | | | | 1,154,790 | |
1,385,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Airports (Los Angeles International Airport)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2036 | | | | 1,593,346 | |
25,000,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Airports (Los Angeles International Airport)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2043 | | | | 28,444,938 | |
55,750,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Airports (Los Angeles International Airport)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2044 | | | | 62,490,826 | |
10,000,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Water & Power1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 11,285,900 | |
20,000,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Water & Power1,7 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2049 | | | | 23,510,400 | |
7,555,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Regional Airports Improvement Corp. (Delta-Continental Airlines)1 | | | 9.250 | | | | 08/01/2024 | | | | 7,605,845 | |
255,000 | | Maywood, CA Public Financing Authority1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 09/01/2038 | | | | 255,301 | |
|
14 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
California (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$10,000,000 | | Northern CA Tobacco Securitization Authority (TASC)1 | | | 5.375 | % | | | 06/01/2038 | | | $ | 10,044,500 | |
45,000 | | Placer County, CA Improvement Bond Act 19151 | | | 6.500 | | | | 09/02/2030 | | | | 45,107 | |
3,975,000 | | Rialto, CA Redevel. Agency (Merged Project Area)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2037 | | | | 4,603,607 | |
1,750,000 | | Riverside County, CA Redevel. Agency1 | | | 7.125 | | | | 10/01/2042 | | | | 2,001,598 | |
27,015,000 | | Riverside County, CA Transportation Commission2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 06/01/2036 | | | | 28,814,194 | |
10,000,000 | | Sacramento, CA Convention Center Complex1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2048 | | | | 11,354,600 | |
2,000,000 | | San Buenaventura, CA Community Memorial Health Systems1 | | | 8.000 | | | | 12/01/2031 | | | | 2,237,640 | |
10,000,000 | | San Francisco, CA City & County Airports Commission1,7 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2044 | | | | 11,298,700 | |
4,700,000 | | San Francisco, CA City & County Airports Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2048 | | | | 5,240,547 | |
13,000,000 | | San Francisco, CA City & County Airports Commission1,7 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2049 | | | | 14,616,810 | |
750,000 | | San Francisco, CA City & County Redevel. Financing Authority (Mission Bay North Redevel.)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 827,288 | |
1,000,000 | | San Francisco, CA City & County Redevel. Financing Authority (Mission Bay North Redevel.)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 1,107,110 | |
15,920,000 | | Santa Clara County, CA GO2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2040 | | | | 16,316,368 | |
6,000,000 | | Santa Clara, CA Redevel. Agency Tax Allocation (Bayshore North)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 06/01/2026 | | | | 6,583,260 | |
12,115,000 | | Stockton, CA Unified School District | | | 5.918 | 6 | | | 08/01/2038 | | | | 5,761,167 | |
14,735,000 | | Stockton, CA Unified School District | | | 5.948 | 6 | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 6,073,030 | |
17,145,000 | | Stockton, CA Unified School District | | | 5.948 | 6 | | | 08/01/2043 | | | | 6,452,692 | |
6,245,000 | | Stockton, CA Unified School District | | | 5.997 | 6 | | | 08/01/2037 | | | | 3,113,320 | |
1,335,000 | | Susanville, CA Public Financing Authority (Utility Enterprises)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 06/01/2035 | | | | 1,362,528 | |
1,425,000 | | Susanville, CA Public Financing Authority (Utility Enterprises)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/01/2045 | | | | 1,452,631 | |
3,500,000 | | West Hollywood, CA Community Devel. Commission Tax Allocation (East Side Redevel.)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 09/01/2042 | | | | 3,980,725 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 830,258,410 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Colorado—4.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,075,000 | | Amber Creek, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.125 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,055,070 | |
515,000 | | Amber Creek, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 503,330 | |
1,240,000 | | Arista, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 1,257,558 | |
3,500,000 | | Arista, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.125 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 3,552,710 | |
3,260,000 | | Banning Lewis Ranch, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 3,290,351 | |
2,195,000 | | Banning Lewis Ranch, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 2,215,436 | |
500,000 | | Banning Lewis Ranch, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 8.000 | | | | 12/15/2048 | | | | 504,105 | |
3,100,000 | | Base Village, CO Metropolitan District No. 21 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 3,116,461 | |
500,000 | | Blue Lake, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 8.000 | | | | 12/15/2046 | | | | 501,645 | |
1,750,000 | | Blue Lake, CO Metropolitan District No. 31 | | | 5.250 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 1,706,110 | |
|
15 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Colorado (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$551,000 | | BNC, CO Metropolitan District No. 1 | | | 7.375 | % | | | 12/15/2047 | | | $ | 549,854 | |
670,000 | | Brighton Crossing, CO Metropolitan District No. 4 | | | 7.000 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 648,205 | |
1,000,000 | | Bromley Park, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 6.375 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 986,210 | |
2,734,000 | | Buffalo Ridge, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.375 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 2,725,115 | |
1,345,000 | | Cherrylane, CO Metropolitan District1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,344,892 | |
574,000 | | Cherrylane, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.375 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 572,806 | |
500,000 | | Clear Creek Station, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 7.375 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 501,555 | |
4,500,000 | | CO Canyons Metropolitan District No. 5 | | | 6.125 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 4,520,655 | |
2,000,000 | | CO Canyons Metropolitan District No. 6 | | | 6.125 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,950,920 | |
1,025,000 | | CO Country Club Highlands Metropolitan District5,8 | | | 7.250 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 871,250 | |
2,600,000 | | CO Elbert and Highway 86 Metropolitan District1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 2,695,394 | |
4,475,000 | | CO Elbert and Highway 86 Metropolitan District5,8 | | | 7.500 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 3,356,250 | |
1,780,000 | | CO Fossil Ridge Metropolitan District No. 11 | | | 7.250 | | | | 12/01/2040 | | | | 1,842,656 | |
1,100,000 | | CO Health Facilities Authority (Catholic Health Initiatives)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2036 | | | | 1,107,975 | |
4,425,000 | | CO Health Facilities Authority (ELGS/ELGSS/ ELGSF/GSSH Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 4,732,228 | |
14,350,000 | | CO Health Facilities Authority (Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health System)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2044 | | | | 15,484,081 | |
1,030,000 | | CO Health Facilities Authority Health & Residential Care Facilities (Volunteers of America)1 | | | 5.300 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,020,390 | |
1,040,000 | | CO International Center Metropolitan District No. 3 | | | 7.500 | | | | 12/15/2038 | | | | 1,023,984 | |
1,919,000 | | CO Midcities Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2046 | | | | 1,873,692 | |
12,585,000 | | CO Park Valley Water and Sanitation Metropolitan District4,5 | | | 5.080 | 6 | | | 12/15/2017 | | | | 2,642,850 | |
1,590,000 | | CO Potomac Farms Metropolitan District | | | 7.250 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 1,445,326 | |
196,000 | | CO Potomac Farms Metropolitan District | | | 7.625 | 3 | | | 12/01/2023 | | | | 184,289 | |
1,720,000 | | CO Sorrell Ranch Metropolitan District4,5 | | | 6.750 | | | | 12/15/2036 | | | | 481,600 | |
569,000 | | CO Table Mountain Metropolitan District | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2045 | | | | 580,152 | |
8,000,000 | | CO Talon Pointe Metropolitan District4,5 | | | 8.000 | | | | 12/01/2039 | | | | 960,000 | |
500,000 | | Copperleaf, CO Metropolitan District No. 3 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 494,555 | |
700,000 | | Copperleaf, CO Metropolitan District No. 3 | | | 5.125 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 682,962 | |
506,000 | | Copperleaf, CO Metropolitan District No. 3 | | | 7.625 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 497,039 | |
3,415,000 | | Cundall Farms, CO Metropolitan District1 | | | 6.875 | | | | 12/01/2044 | | | | 3,546,682 | |
750,000 | | Cundall Farms, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.375 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 724,335 | |
785,000 | | Cundall Farms, CO Metropolitan District1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2044 | | | | 845,107 | |
792,000 | | Cundall Farms, CO Metropolitan District | | | 12.000 | | | | 12/15/2049 | | | | 771,970 | |
34,120,000 | | Denver, CO City & County Airport1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 38,012,068 | |
26,450,000 | | Denver, CO City & County Airport1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 30,127,344 | |
1,250,000 | | Denver, CO Connection West Metropolitan District | | | 5.375 | | | | 08/01/2047 | | | | 1,254,500 | |
1,360,000 | | Denver, CO Gateway Center Metropolitan District | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 1,387,594 | |
2,130,000 | | Denver, CO Gateway Center Metropolitan District | | | 5.625 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 2,176,434 | |
1,690,000 | | Dublin North, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 5.125 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,648,865 | |
|
16 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Colorado (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$2,000,000 | | Erie Farm, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.500 | % | | | 12/01/2045 | | | $ | 2,012,700 | |
600,000 | | Erie Farm, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2045 | | | | 593,154 | |
920,000 | | Godding Hollow, CO Metropolitan District | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 926,615 | |
2,065,000 | | Hawthorn, CO Metropolitan District No. 21 | | | 6.375 | | | | 12/01/2044 | | | | 2,143,346 | |
950,000 | | Hawthorn, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2044 | | | | 1,026,257 | |
928,000 | | Hawthorn, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 10.000 | | | | 12/15/2051 | | | | 899,835 | |
5,015,000 | | Hunting Hill, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.625 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 5,061,940 | |
775,000 | | Iliff Commons, CO Metropolitan District No. 31 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 779,456 | |
2,235,000 | | Interpark, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 2,161,737 | |
1,365,000 | | Interquest South, CO Business Improvement District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,312,529 | |
1,619,000 | | Lewis Pointe, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 1,620,635 | |
500,000 | | Leyden Ranch, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.000 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 503,865 | |
1,195,000 | | Leyden Rock, CO Metropolitan District No. 10 | | | 7.250 | | | | 12/15/2045 | | | | 1,183,134 | |
1,025,000 | | Leyden Rock, CO Metropolitan District No. 10 | | | 10.750 | | | | 12/15/2049 | | | | 995,859 | |
1,140,000 | | Littleton Village, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 7.625 | | | | 12/15/2028 | | | | 1,139,954 | |
8,065,000 | | Millers Landing, CO Business Improvement District | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 7,932,250 | |
2,185,000 | | Millers Landing, CO Business Improvement District | | | 8.000 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 2,184,629 | |
1,000,000 | | Mountain Shadows, CO Metropolitan District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 1,002,800 | |
1,760,000 | | North Holly, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 1,709,646 | |
2,290,000 | | Prairie Farm, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.250 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 2,252,536 | |
1,270,000 | | Prairie Farm, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.375 | | | | 12/15/2048 | | | | 1,245,718 | |
2,595,000 | | Prairiestar, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 2,669,658 | |
4,340,000 | | Rendezvous, CO Metropolitan District No. 4 | | | 5.625 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 4,324,680 | |
1,200,000 | | Sheridan Station West, CO Metropolitan District | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,164,696 | |
2,815,000 | | South Aurora, CO Regional Improvement Authority | | | 6.250 | | | | 12/01/2057 | | | | 2,834,761 | |
810,000 | | Southglenn, CO Metropolitan District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2036 | | | | 818,043 | |
2,000,000 | | Stone Creek, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.625 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,967,600 | |
600,000 | | Stone Creek, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.875 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 592,092 | |
680,000 | | Tabernash Meadows, CO Water & Sanitation District1 | | | 7.125 | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 701,366 | |
7,550,000 | | Tailholt, CO Metropolitan District No. 3 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 7,628,973 | |
294,000 | | Tallyns Reach, CO Metropolitan District No. 31 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2033 | | | | 306,901 | |
1,220,000 | | Tallyns Reach, CO Metropolitan District No. 3 | | | 6.750 | | | | 11/01/2038 | | | | 1,201,346 | |
749,000 | | Thompson Crossing, CO Metropolitan District No. 61 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2044 | | | | 752,341 | |
1,500,000 | | Timnath Ranch, CO Metropolitan District No. 41 | | | 5.250 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 1,478,730 | |
1,900,000 | | Timnath Ranch, CO Metropolitan District No. 41 | | | 5.375 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,865,705 | |
953,000 | | Timnath Ranch, CO Metropolitan District No. 4 | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 938,829 | |
1,610,000 | | Two Bridges, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.625 | | | | 08/01/2048 | | | | 1,571,521 | |
508,000 | | Two Bridges, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.875 | | | | 08/01/2048 | | | | 497,972 | |
1,375,000 | | Village at Southgate, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.625 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 1,344,736 | |
1,645,000 | | Villas Eastlake Reservoir, CO Metropolitan District1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 1,694,515 | |
5,191,763 | | Woodmen Heights, CO Metropolitan District No. 11 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2041 | | | | 5,201,887 | |
|
17 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Colorado (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$20,183,519 | | Woodmen Heights, CO Metropolitan District No. 1 | | | 7.300 | %3 | | | 12/15/2041 | | | $ | 17,047,202 | |
1,245,000 | | York Street, CO Metropolitan District | | | 6.250 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,248,474 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 250,515,183 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Connecticut—1.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
12,500,000 | | CT GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/15/2030 | | | | 13,371,750 | |
5,295,000 | | CT GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/15/2031 | | | | 5,627,473 | |
4,500,000 | | CT GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/15/2033 | | | | 5,133,645 | |
2,000,000 | | CT GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/15/2034 | | | | 2,272,780 | |
2,500,000 | | CT GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/15/2035 | | | | 2,827,800 | |
2,000,000 | | CT GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/15/2037 | | | | 2,241,320 | |
11,865,000 | | CT Special Tax (Transportation Infrastructure)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2031 | | | | 13,470,572 | |
6,000,000 | | CT Special Tax (Transportation Infrastructure)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2032 | | | | 6,661,980 | |
7,965,000 | | CT Special Tax (Transportation Infrastructure)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2033 | | | | 8,824,025 | |
470,000 | | Georgetown, CT Special Taxing District4 | | | 5.125 | | | | 10/01/2036 | | | | 150,400 | |
1,580,000 | | Hartford, CT GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2033 | | | | 1,752,821 | |
12,949,293 | | Mashantucket Western Pequot Tribe CT4,9 | | | 6.050 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 443,513 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 62,778,079 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Delaware—0.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,100,000 | | Bridgeville, DE Special Obligation (Heritage Shores)1 | | | 5.450 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,079,485 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
District of Columbia—3.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4,745,000 | | District of Columbia (Howard University)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 10/01/2032 | | | | 5,200,520 | |
5,255,000 | | District of Columbia (Howard University)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 10/01/2032 | | | | 5,503,509 | |
315,000 | | District of Columbia (Howard University)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 10/01/2041 | | | | 346,831 | |
19,295,000 | | District of Columbia (Howard University)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 10/01/2041 | | | | 20,131,245 | |
3,055,000 | | District of Columbia Center for Strategic & International Studies1 | | | 6.375 | | | | 03/01/2031 | | | | 3,308,412 | |
2,000,000 | | District of Columbia Center for Strategic & International Studies1 | | | 6.625 | | | | 03/01/2041 | | | | 2,197,360 | |
32,680,000 | | District of Columbia Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 05/15/2040 | | | | 33,813,016 | |
1,275,680,000 | | District of Columbia Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. (TASC) | | | 5.912 | 6 | | | 06/15/2055 | | | | 53,030,018 | |
1,055,000,000 | | District of Columbia Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. (TASC) | | | 6.211 | 6 | | | 06/15/2055 | | | | 36,861,700 | |
11,045,000 | | District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2049 | | | | 12,583,789 | |
11,530,000 | | Metropolitan Washington D.C. Airport Authority1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 10/01/2035 | | | | 11,867,022 | |
6,375,000 | | Metropolitan Washington D.C. Airport Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2034 | | | | 7,356,049 | |
11,000,000 | | Metropolitan Washington D.C. Airport Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2037 | | | | 12,525,590 | |
1,810,000 | | Metropolitan Washington D.C. Airport Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2048 | | | | 2,018,222 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 206,743,283 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Florida—6.9% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
750,000 | | Alachua County, FL Health Facilities Authority (Oak Hammock University Florida)1 | | | 8.000 | | | | 10/01/2032 | | | | 849,225 | |
|
18 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Florida (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,000,000 | | Alachua County, FL Health Facilities Authority (Oak Hammock University Florida)1 | | | 8.000 | % | | | 10/01/2042 | | | $ | 1,126,870 | |
1,000,000 | | Alachua County, FL Health Facilities Authority (Oak Hammock University Florida)1 | | | 8.000 | | | | 10/01/2046 | | | | 1,123,270 | |
4,655,000 | | Amelia Concourse, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.750 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 4,329,150 | |
3,125,000 | | Amelia Concourse, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2047 | | | | 3,025,656 | |
4,750,000 | | Arlington Ridge, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 4,613,865 | |
1,045,000 | | Avignon Villages, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.300 | | | | 05/01/2014 | | | | 73,150 | |
755,000 | | Avignon Villages, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.400 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 52,850 | |
13,774,400 | | Baker, FL Correctional Devel. Corp. (Baker County Detention Center)7 | | | 8.500 | | | | 02/01/2030 | | | | 11,336,331 | |
7,555,000 | | Belle Isle, FL Charter School (Cornerstone Charter Academy & Cornerstone Charter High School Obligated Group)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 10/01/2042 | | | | 7,964,028 | |
5,845,000 | | Buckeye Park, FL Community Devel. District4 | | | 7.875 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 2,104,200 | |
785,000 | | Carlton Lakes, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment7 | | | 5.625 | | | | 11/01/2036 | | | | 798,463 | |
1,915,000 | | Carlton Lakes, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment7 | | | 5.750 | | | | 11/01/2047 | | | | 1,944,663 | |
24,545,000 | | CFM, FL Community Devel. District, Series A4,5 | | | 6.250 | | | | 05/01/2035 | | | | 8,713,475 | |
7,075,000 | | Chapel Creek, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment4,5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 6,367,500 | |
13,074,058 | | Clearwater Cay, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 7,452,213 | |
1,150,000 | | Collier County, FL IDA (Gulf Coast Charter Academy South)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 1,099,895 | |
1,875,000 | | Collier County, FL IDA (Gulf Coast Charter Academy South)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,734,994 | |
1,690,000 | | Creekside, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.200 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 760,500 | |
840,000 | | Crosscreek, FL Community Devel. District | | | 5.600 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 795,833 | |
20,000 | | Crosscreek, FL Community Devel. District4 | | | 5.600 | | | | 05/01/2039 | | | | 18,538 | |
1,210,000 | | Crosscreek, FL Community Devel. District | | | 6.750 | | | | 11/30/2021 | | | | 1,204,180 | |
55,000 | | Dade County, FL HFA (Golden Lakes Apartments)1 | | | 6.050 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 55,072 | |
3,230,000 | | FL Capital Trust Agency (AHFP/AAD/AAHI/APH/ AWHC/AAHII/AW Obligated Group)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 3,070,277 | |
990,000 | | FL Capital Trust Agency (Elim Senior Hsg.) | | | 5.625 | | | | 08/01/2037 | | | | 972,705 | |
2,350,000 | | FL Capital Trust Agency (Elim Senior Hsg.) | | | 5.875 | | | | 08/01/2052 | | | | 2,304,457 | |
850,000 | | FL Capital Trust Agency (Florida Charter Educational Foundation) | | | 5.375 | | | | 06/15/2038 | | | | 840,370 | |
1,590,000 | | FL Capital Trust Agency (Florida Charter Educational Foundation) | | | 5.375 | | | | 06/15/2048 | | | | 1,545,305 | |
1,100,000 | | FL Capital Trust Agency (Viera Charter School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/15/2047 | | | | 1,072,104 | |
755,000 | | FL Capital Trust Agency (Viera Charter School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/15/2052 | | | | 722,965 | |
3,725,000 | | FL Dept. of Transportation (Acquisition & Bridge Construction)2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 3,966,754 | |
4,030,000 | | FL Dept. of Transportation (Acquisition & Bridge Construction)2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 4,274,996 | |
4,195,000 | | FL Dept. of Transportation (Acquisition & Bridge Construction)2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 4,422,735 | |
|
19 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Florida (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$4,360,000 | | FL Dept. of Transportation (Acquisition & Bridge Construction)2 | | | 4.000 | % | | | 07/01/2040 | | | $ | 4,582,382 | |
6,045,000 | | FL Devel. Finance Corp. (Florida Charter Educational Foundation)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2046 | | | | 5,676,134 | |
300,000 | | FL Devel. Finance Corp. (Learning Gate Community School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2038 | | | | 314,430 | |
985,000 | | FL Devel. Finance Corp. (Learning Gate Community School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2048 | | | | 1,024,173 | |
80,000 | | FL HFA (Stoddert Arms Apartments)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 09/01/2026 | | | | 80,122 | |
2,477,578 | | FL Lake Ashton II Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 2,309,871 | |
3,334,862 | | Glades, FL Correctional Devel. Corp. | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 03/01/2030 | | | | 400,183 | |
5,834,388 | | Glades, FL Correctional Devel. Corp. | | | 7.000 | | | | 03/01/2030 | | | | 5,042,662 | |
2,805,000 | | Greater Lakes/Sawgrass Bay, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 2,559,394 | |
1,615,000 | | Harbor Bay, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 05/01/2034 | | | | 1,621,831 | |
335,000 | | Highland Meadows, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment, Series A | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 323,399 | |
4,775,000 | | Indigo, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.750 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 3,342,500 | |
15,300,000 | | Lake County, FL Senior Living (Village Veranda at Lady Lake/VVLL Properties Obligated Group) | | | 7.125 | | | | 01/01/2052 | | | | 14,406,939 | |
1,685,000 | | Lake Helen, FL Educational Facilities (Ivy Hawn Charter School) | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/15/2048 | | | | 1,676,423 | |
1,830,000 | | Lake Helen, FL Educational Facilities (Ivy Hawn Charter School) | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/15/2053 | | | | 1,841,858 | |
17,270,000 | | Lakewood Ranch, FL Stewardship District (Country Club East Investors)1 | | | 5.400 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 17,336,490 | |
1,785,000 | | Lee County, FL IDA (VOA Lee County Health Care Facility) | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2052 | | | | 1,793,407 | |
3,205,000 | | Legends Bay, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 3,205,673 | |
5,000,000 | | Magnolia Creek, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.600 | | | | 05/01/2014 | | | | 1,125,000 | |
5,360,000 | | Magnolia Creek, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.900 | | | | 05/01/2039 | | | | 1,206,000 | |
195,000 | | Magnolia West, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment1 | | | 5.350 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 190,544 | |
1,715,000 | | Miami, FL World Center Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 1,748,151 | |
2,570,000 | | Miami, FL World Center Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2049 | | | | 2,623,970 | |
3,895,000 | | Miami-Dade County, FL Aviation1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2040 | | | | 4,334,122 | |
5,455,000 | | Miami-Dade County, FL School Board1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2032 | | | | 6,174,351 | |
2,500,000 | | Miami-Dade County, FL School Board Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2117 Trust | | | 11.326 | 10 | | | 02/01/2027 | | | | 2,497,300 | |
2,500,000 | | Miami-Dade County, FL School Board Tender Option Bond Series2015-XF2117-2 Trust | | | 10.460 | 10 | | | 02/01/2027 | | | | 2,492,775 | |
12,500,000 | | Miami-Dade County, FL School Board Tender Option Bond Series2015-XF2117-3 Trust | | | 11.759 | 10 | | | 02/01/2034 | | | | 12,468,250 | |
11,000,000 | | Miami-Dade County, FL Transit System2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2045 | | | | 11,310,090 | |
6,526,716 | | Montecito, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.100 | | | | 05/01/2013 | | | | 6,265,647 | |
5,310,000 | | Montecito, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 5,097,600 | |
9,635,000 | | Nassau County, FL (Nassau Care Centers) | | | 6.900 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 9,672,673 | |
|
20 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Florida (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$3,640,000 | | Naturewalk, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.300 | % | | | 05/01/2016 | | | $ | 2,875,600 | |
4,345,000 | | Naturewalk, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 3,432,550 | |
3,000,000 | | Palm Beach County, FL Health Facilities Authority (Sinai Residences Boca Raton)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 06/01/2049 | | | | 3,373,230 | |
11,620,000 | | Palm Coast Park, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment | | | 5.700 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 11,361,223 | |
1,850,000 | | Palm River, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.150 | | | | 05/01/2013 | | | | 925,000 | |
1,565,000 | | Palm River, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.375 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 782,500 | |
5,274,584 | | Pine Ridge Plantation, FL Community Devel. District | | | 5.400 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 4,695,435 | |
2,250,000 | | Pinellas County, FL Educational Facilities Authority (Pinellas Prep Academy)1 | | | 7.125 | | | | 09/15/2041 | | | | 2,318,963 | |
5,000,000 | | Pompano Beach, FL GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 5,144,600 | |
9,200,000 | | Portico, FL Community Devel. District | | | 5.450 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 8,685,996 | |
5,905,000 | | Portofino Isles, FL Community Devel. District (Portofino Court)4,5 | | | 5.600 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 2,480,100 | |
2,470,000 | | Portofino Vista, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2013 | | | | 1,235,000 | |
3,420,000 | | Reunion East, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.800 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 34 | |
1,465,000 | | Reunion East, FL Community Devel. District | | | 6.600 | | | | 05/01/2033 | | | | 1,462,129 | |
3,485,000 | | Reunion East, FL Community Devel. District | | | 6.600 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 3,477,438 | |
1,425,000 | | Reunion East, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 7.375 | | | | 05/01/2033 | | | | 14 | |
140,000 | | Ridgewood Trails, FL Community Devel. District | | | 5.650 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 131,401 | |
7,580,000 | | River Glen, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment4,5 | | | 5.450 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 4,548,000 | |
144,534 | | Santa Rosa Bay, FL Bridge Authority | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 139,162 | |
1,895,000 | | Sarasota County, FL Educational Facilities (School of Arts & Sciences)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2040 | | | | 1,930,247 | |
3,790,000 | | Seminole County, FL IDA (Progressive Health)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 03/01/2035 | | | | 3,792,085 | |
7,035,000 | | South Bay, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 05/01/2020 | | | | 7,019,804 | |
7,000,000 | | South Bay, FL Community Devel. District | | | 5.950 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 6,652,100 | |
5,110,000 | | South Bay, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.950 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 51 | |
3,240,000 | | South Bay, FL Community Devel. District5 | | | 6.600 | 3 | | | 05/01/2025 | | | | 1,631,534 | |
8,750,000 | | South Bay, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 6.600 | 3 | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 4,410,613 | |
3,540,000 | | South Fork East, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 6.500 | 3 | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 3,620,393 | |
14,000,000 | | South Miami, FL Health Facilities Authority (BHSF/ BHM/HHI/SMH/MarH/DrsH/WKBP/BOS/FHlth/ BHlth/BethH Obligated Group)2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/15/2036 | | | | 14,444,115 | |
3,500,000 | | St. Johns County, FL IDA (Presbyterian Retirement)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 08/01/2040 | | | | 3,708,985 | |
3,500,000 | | St. Johns County, FL IDA (Presbyterian Retirement)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/01/2045 | | | | 3,715,390 | |
1,000,000 | | St. Johns County, FL IDA (St. John’s County Welfare Federation) | | | 5.250 | | | | 10/01/2041 | | | | 812,190 | |
625,000 | | Tern Bay, FL Community Devel. District5 | | | 5.375 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 616,725 | |
13,125,000 | | Town Center, FL at Palm Coast Community Devel. District1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 13,173,300 | |
4,950,000 | | Treeline, FL Preservation Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 6.800 | | | | 05/01/2039 | | | | 2,722,500 | |
|
21 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Florida (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$535,000 | | Villages of Glen Creek FL Community Devel. District Community Devel. District | | | 4.750 | % | | | 05/01/2026 | | | $ | 513,102 | |
1,080,000 | | Villages of Glen Creek FL Community Devel. District Community Devel. District | | | 5.250 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 995,792 | |
1,815,000 | | Villages of Glen Creek FL Community Devel. District Community Devel. District | | | 5.375 | | | | 05/01/2046 | | | | 1,634,426 | |
2,515,000 | | Villages of Glen Creek FL Community Devel. District Community Devel. District7 | | | 5.375 | | | | 05/01/2046 | | | | 2,264,783 | |
3,630,098 | | Waterford Estates, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment4,5 | | | 5.125 | | | | 05/01/2013 | | | | 3,448,593 | |
2,837,715 | | Waterford Estates, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment4,5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 2,695,829 | |
126,000 | | Waters Edge, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.350 | | | | 05/01/2039 | | | | 121,317 | |
2,910,000 | | Waters Edge, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 6.600 | 3 | | | 05/01/2039 | | | | 2,802,854 | |
1,214,282 | | Waterstone, FL Community Devel. District | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 915,556 | |
8,231,933 | | Waterstone, FL Community Devel. District | | | 5.020 | 6 | | | 11/01/2028 | | | | 4,545,015 | |
2,327,525 | | Waterstone, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2018 | | | | 1,512,891 | |
1,215,000 | | West Villages, FL Improvement District4,5 | | | 5.350 | | | | 05/01/2015 | | | | 935,550 | |
18,150,000 | | West Villages, FL Improvement District4,5 | | | 5.800 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 13,975,500 | |
14,925,000 | | Westridge, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.800 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 11,193,750 | |
9,870,000 | | Westside, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.650 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 7,106,400 | |
15,585,000 | | Westside, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 7.200 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 8,649,675 | |
7,420,000 | | Wyld Palms, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.400 | | | | 05/01/2015 | | | | 2,003,400 | |
4,340,000 | | Wyld Palms, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 1,171,800 | |
3,786,132 | | Zephyr Ridge, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 05/01/2013 | | | | 3,180,351 | |
2,634,476 | | Zephyr Ridge, FL Community Devel. District4,5 | | | 5.625 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 2,212,959 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 422,678,883 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Georgia—1.9% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,445,000 | | Cobb County, GA Devel. Authority (Provident Group-Creekside Properties) | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 1,311,554 | |
5,440,000 | | Cobb County, GA Devel. Authority (Provident Group-Creekside Properties) | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2051 | | | | 4,684,602 | |
3,100,000 | | Floyd County, GA Devel. Authority (Lavender Mountain Senior Living)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2033 | | | | 3,084,438 | |
14,000,000 | | Floyd County, GA Devel. Authority (Lavender Mountain Senior Living)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 13,998,460 | |
9,710,000 | | Floyd County, GA Devel. Authority (Lavender Mountain Senior Living)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2053 | | | | 9,778,844 | |
6,850,000 | | Floyd County, GA Devel. Authority (Spires at Berry College)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 6,786,637 | |
31,945,000 | | Fulton County, GA Devel. Authority (Piedmont Healthcare)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2029 | | | | 32,322,923 | |
13,730,000 | | Fulton County, GA Devel. Authority (Piedmont Healthcare/Piedmont Hospital/Piedmont Hospital Foundation Obligated Group)2 | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/15/2037 | | | | 13,905,086 | |
1,405,000 | | GA Environmental Loan Acquisition Corp. (Local Water Authority)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 03/15/2031 | | | | 1,408,386 | |
|
22 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Georgia (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$9,100,000 | | GA Road & Tollway Authority(I-75 S Express Lanes)1 | | | 0.000 | %3 | | | 06/01/2049 | | | $ | 6,287,281 | |
2,250,000 | | GA Road & Tollway Authority(I-75 S Express Lanes) | | | 6.246 | 6 | | | 06/01/2024 | | | | 1,648,755 | |
3,750,000 | | GA Road & Tollway Authority(I-75 S Express Lanes) | | | 6.748 | 6 | | | 06/01/2034 | | | | 1,361,212 | |
1,720,000 | | Gainesville & Hall County, GA Devel. Authority Educational Facilities (Riverside Military Academy)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2047 | | | | 1,767,076 | |
1,720,000 | | Gainesville & Hall County, GA Devel. Authority Educational Facilities (Riverside Military Academy)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 03/01/2052 | | | | 1,775,539 | |
6,375,000 | | Oconee County, GA IDA (Westminster Presbyterian Homes) | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2028 | | | | 6,390,938 | |
2,090,000 | | Oconee County, GA IDA (Westminster Presbyterian Homes) | | | 5.500 | 10 | | | 12/01/2053 | | | | 2,098,611 | |
2,635,000 | | Oconee County, GA IDA (Westminster Presbyterian Homes) | | | 6.125 | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 2,655,026 | |
3,675,000 | | Oconee County, GA IDA (Westminster Presbyterian Homes) | | | 6.250 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 3,698,704 | |
3,090,000 | | Oconee County, GA IDA (Westminster Presbyterian Homes) | | | 6.375 | | | | 12/01/2053 | | | | 3,110,950 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 118,075,022 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hawaii—0.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
15,450,000 | | HI Airport System1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 17,149,809 | |
5,000,000 | | HI Dept. of Budget & Finance Special Purpose (Hawaiian Electric/Hawaiian Electric Light Company)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 5,089,650 | |
580,000 | | HI Dept. of Transportation (Continental Airlines)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 11/15/2027 | | | | 587,859 | |
1,430,000 | | Kuakini, HI Health System (KMC/KHS/KGC/KSS Obligated Group)1 | | | 6.300 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 1,434,118 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 24,261,436 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Idaho—0.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
960,000 | | ID Health Facilities Authority (Valley Vista Care Corp./Vista Community Hsg. Corp. Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2047 | | | | 969,331 | |
100,000 | | ID Hsg. & Finance Assoc. (Compass Public Charter School)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 100,255 | |
370,000 | | ID Hsg. & Finance Assoc. (Compass Public Charter School)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 391,216 | |
1,135,000 | | ID Hsg. & Finance Assoc. (Compass Public Charter School)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2054 | | | | 1,179,560 | |
100,800 | | Nampa, ID Local Improvement District No. 148 | | | 6.625 | | | | 09/01/2030 | | | | 103,358 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,743,720 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Illinois—7.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3,000,000 | | Carol Stream, IL Park District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 3,330,270 | |
|
23 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Illinois (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$30,685,000 | | Caseyville, IL Tax (Forest Lakes)4,5 | | | 7.000 | % | | | 12/30/2022 | | | $ | 306,850 | |
7,555,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2046 | | | | 8,027,868 | |
5,700,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 04/01/2046 | | | | 6,499,311 | |
1,850,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education (School Reform)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2023 | | | | 2,038,071 | |
3,500,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education (School Reform)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2024 | | | | 3,913,070 | |
2,500,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education (School Reform)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2025 | | | | 2,825,625 | |
1,725,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education (School Reform)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2026 | | | | 1,962,671 | |
2,100,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education (School Reform)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2027 | | | | 2,404,164 | |
2,000,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education (School Reform)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2029 | | | | 2,278,200 | |
1,250,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education (School Reform)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 1,395,875 | |
3,000,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education (School Reform)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2035 | | | | 3,310,860 | |
1,500,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education (School Reform)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 1,684,350 | |
7,000,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education (School Reform)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 12/01/2044 | | | | 8,018,010 | |
3,580,000 | | Chicago, IL Metropolitan Water Reclamation1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2028 | | | | 4,168,158 | |
6,870,000 | | Chicago, IL Metropolitan Water Reclamation1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2044 | | | | 7,633,944 | |
3,000,000 | | Chicago, IL Midway Airport, Series A1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2033 | | | | 3,254,760 | |
30,000 | | Chicago, IL Multifamily Hsg. (Cottage View Terrace)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 02/20/2042 | | | | 30,049 | |
2,500,000 | | Chicago, IL O’Hare International Airport1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2047 | | | | 2,696,100 | |
3,750,000 | | Chicago, IL O’Hare International Airport1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 4,078,275 | |
5,000,000 | | Chicago, IL O’Hare International Airport1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2052 | | | | 5,349,950 | |
2,755,000 | | Chicago, IL Waterworks1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2030 | | | | 3,221,477 | |
2,900,000 | | Chicago, IL Waterworks1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2031 | | | | 3,364,464 | |
2,135,000 | | Chicago, IL Waterworks1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2032 | | | | 2,462,829 | |
2,000,000 | | Chicago, IL Waterworks1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2033 | | | | 2,300,520 | |
2,885,000 | | Chicago, IL Waterworks1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2035 | | | | 3,280,851 | |
10,032,000 | | Cortland, IL Special Tax (Sheaffer System)4,5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 03/01/2017 | | | | 2,006,400 | |
900,000 | | Du Page County, IL Special Service Area No. 31 Special Tax (Monarch Landing)1,7 | | | 5.625 | | | | 03/01/2036 | | | | 901,746 | |
1,585,000 | | Franklin Park, IL GO1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 1,737,176 | |
2,069,343 | | Gilberts, IL Special Service Area No. 24 Special Tax (Conservancy) | | | 5.375 | | | | 03/01/2034 | | | | 1,971,959 | |
6,165,000 | | Harvey, IL GO4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2027 | | | | 3,390,750 | |
1,800,000 | | Harvey, IL GO4 | | | 5.625 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 990,000 | |
9,645,000 | | IL Educational Facilities Authority (Plum Creek Rolling Meadows)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 9,439,176 | |
1,000,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Admiral at the Lake) | | | 5.125 | | | | 05/15/2038 | | | | 980,120 | |
3,220,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Admiral at the Lake) | | | 5.250 | | | | 05/15/2042 | | | | 3,156,147 | |
2,825,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Admiral at the Lake) | | | 5.250 | | | | 05/15/2054 | | | | 2,706,802 | |
5,820,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Advocate Health Care)2 | | | 5.375 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 5,853,698 | |
21,765,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Advocate Health Care)2 | | | 5.375 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 21,891,012 | |
5,180,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Advocate Health Care)2 | | | 5.375 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 5,209,992 | |
19,410,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Advocate Health Care)2 | | | 5.375 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 19,522,377 | |
9,425,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Advocate Health Care)2 | | | 5.500 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 9,481,456 | |
10,575,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Advocate Health Care)2 | | | 5.500 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 10,638,344 | |
365,000 | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 367,146 | |
320,000 | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 321,830 | |
|
24 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Illinois (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$100,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Art Institute of Chicago)1 | | | 5.250 | % | | | 03/01/2040 | | | $ | 103,481 | |
12,500,000 | | IL Finance Authority (CDHS)2 | | | 5.500 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 12,838,781 | |
5,000,000 | | IL Finance Authority (CDHS/CDHA)2 | | | 5.375 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 5,130,938 | |
5,425,000 | | IL Finance Authority (DeKalb Supportive Living)1 | | | 6.100 | | | | 12/01/2041 | | | | 5,125,052 | |
2,000,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Friendship Village Schaumburg) | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2027 | | | | 1,994,740 | |
1,000,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Lake Forest College)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 10/01/2048 | | | | 1,052,280 | |
715,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Luther Oaks) | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/15/2026 | | | | 715,486 | |
1,500,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Luther Oaks) | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/15/2039 | | | | 1,500,135 | |
100,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Memorial Health System/ Memorial Medical Center-Woodstock Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 04/01/2039 | | | | 100,608 | |
105,000 | | IL Finance Authority (PHN/PCTC/PC&SHN/PLC/ PCHN/PSSC/PHCr/PBH/PAS/PHFBT Obligated Group)1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 08/15/2034 | | | | 108,323 | |
11,050,000 | | IL Finance Authority (PHN/PCTC/PC&SHN/PLC/ PCHN/PSSC/PHCr/PBH/PAS/PHFBT Obligated Group)1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 08/15/2034 | | | | 11,399,733 | |
575,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Rogers Park Montessori School)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 02/01/2034 | | | | 602,186 | |
1,310,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Rogers Park Montessori School)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 02/01/2045 | | | | 1,358,575 | |
575,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine & Science)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2042 | | | | 615,624 | |
700,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine & Science)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2047 | | | | 746,340 | |
11,745,000 | | IL Finance Authority (St. Anthony Lassing)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 11,957,819 | |
1,500,000 | | IL Finance Authority (The New Admiral at the Lake)1 | | | 8.000 | | | | 05/15/2040 | | | | 1,615,140 | |
5,775,000 | | IL Finance Authority (The New Admiral at the Lake)1 | | | 8.000 | | | | 05/15/2046 | | | | 6,218,289 | |
3,935,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Villa St. Benedict)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 11/15/2035 | | | | 4,268,924 | |
4,400,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Villa St. Benedict)1 | | | 6.375 | | | | 11/15/2043 | | | | 4,794,020 | |
3,000,000 | | IL GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2028 | | | | 3,248,250 | |
4,625,000 | | IL GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2028 | | | | 5,007,719 | |
5,000,000 | | IL GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2029 | | | | 5,401,200 | |
6,500,000 | | IL GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2029 | | | | 7,021,560 | |
3,000,000 | | IL GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2030 | | | | 3,225,780 | |
10,000,000 | | IL GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2030 | | | | 10,752,600 | |
3,360,000 | | IL GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2033 | | | | 3,544,094 | |
5,000,000 | | IL GO1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 01/01/2029 | | | | 5,617,100 | |
1,640,000 | | IL Hsg. Devel. Authority (Stonebridge Gurnee) | | | 5.450 | | | | 01/01/2046 | | | | 1,458,386 | |
1,775,000 | | IL Hsg. Devel. Authority (Stonebridge Gurnee) | | | 5.600 | | | | 01/01/2056 | | | | 1,579,253 | |
31,755,000 | | IL Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (McCormick Place Exposition) | | | 4.418 | 6 | | | 06/15/2047 | | | | 8,741,516 | |
6,450,000 | | IL Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (McCormick Place Exposition) | | | 4.509 | 6 | | | 06/15/2043 | | | | 2,155,332 | |
15,000,000 | | IL Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (McCormick Place Exposition) | | | 4.539 | 6 | | | 06/15/2046 | | | | 4,344,600 | |
|
25 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Illinois (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$22,000,000 | | IL Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (McCormick Place Exposition) | | | 4.549 | %6 | | | 12/15/2056 | | | $ | 3,888,060 | |
10,225,000 | | IL Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (McCormick Place Exposition) | | | 4.609 | 6 | | | 06/15/2044 | | | | 3,258,401 | |
5,000,000 | | IL Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (McCormick Place Exposition) | | | 4.628 | 6 | | | 12/15/2041 | | | | 1,798,400 | |
15,580,000 | | IL Sales Tax1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 06/15/2028 | | | | 16,276,893 | |
5,000,000 | | IL Sales Tax1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 06/15/2029 | | | | 5,187,200 | |
10,625,000 | | IL Sales Tax1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 06/15/2030 | | | | 10,605,344 | |
2,010,000 | | IL Sales Tax1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 06/15/2031 | | | | 2,056,310 | |
5,000,000 | | IL Sales Tax1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 06/15/2032 | | | | 4,948,750 | |
5,820,000 | | IL Sales Tax1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 06/15/2032 | | | | 5,760,345 | |
12,830,000 | | IL Sales Tax Securitization Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 14,044,744 | |
4,000,000 | | IL Sales Tax Securitization Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2048 | | | | 4,309,560 | |
1,778,000 | | Manhattan, IL Special Service Area Special Tax (Lakeside Towns Liberty)4,5 | | | 5.750 | | | | 03/01/2022 | | | | 444,500 | |
3,491,000 | | Plano, IL Special Service Area No. 54 | | | 6.000 | | | | 03/01/2036 | | | | 2,618,250 | |
5,400,000 | | Quad Cities, IL Regional EDA (Pheasant Ridge Apartments)5 | | | 6.375 | | | | 08/01/2040 | | | | 3,865,482 | |
162 | | Robbins, IL Res Rec (Robbins Res Rec Partners)1 | | | 7.250 | | | | 10/15/2024 | | | | 159 | |
2,440,000 | | Southwestern IL Devel. Authority (Comprehensive Mental Health Center) | | | 6.625 | | | | 06/01/2037 | | | | 1,834,441 | |
1,500,000 | | Southwestern IL Devel. Authority (Eden Retirement Center) | | | 5.850 | | | | 12/01/2036 | | | | 1,302,345 | |
10,395,000 | | Southwestern IL Devel. Authority (Local Government Programming)5 | | | 7.000 | | | | 10/01/2022 | | | | 6,029,100 | |
3,305,000 | | Southwestern IL Devel. Authority (Village of Sauget)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 11/01/2026 | | | | 3,130,860 | |
12,555,000 | | Upper, IL River Valley Devel. Authority (DeerPath Huntley)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 12,263,222 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 428,368,933 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Indiana—2.3% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2,000,000 | | Allen County, IN Economic Devel. (Storypoint/ SL2016/SLW/SLC/SLFW/SLF Obligated Group) | | | 6.875 | | | | 01/15/2052 | | | | 2,100,240 | |
4,300,000 | | Carmel, IN Redevel. District COP1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/15/2035 | | | | 4,684,076 | |
1,225,000 | | Chesterton, IN Economic Devel. (Storypoint/ SL2016/SLW/SLC Obligated Group) | | | 6.375 | | | | 01/15/2051 | | | | 1,248,998 | |
5,805,000 | | East Chicago, IN Solid Waste Disposal (USG Corp.)1 | | | 6.375 | | | | 08/01/2029 | | | | 5,886,096 | |
3,430,000 | | Evansville, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch Evansville)1 | | | 5.450 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 3,417,789 | |
7,000,000 | | Fort Wayne, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch at Cook Road)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 7,065,730 | |
595,000 | | Fort Wayne, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch Fort Wayne)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 596,380 | |
3,850,000 | | Fort Wayne, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch Fort Wayne)1 | | | 5.350 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 3,791,326 | |
|
26 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Indiana (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$2,050,000 | | IN Finance Authority (Avondale Meadows Academy)1 | | | 5.375 | % | | | 07/01/2047 | | | $ | 1,976,221 | |
1,675,000 | | IN Finance Authority (BHI Senior Living)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 11/15/2031 | | | | 1,759,755 | |
2,850,000 | | IN Finance Authority (BHI Senior Living)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 11/15/2041 | | | | 3,006,721 | |
11,505,000 | | IN Finance Authority (Marian University)1 | | | 6.375 | | | | 09/15/2041 | | | | 12,161,475 | |
10,000,000 | | IN Finance Authority (Parkview Health System/ Parkview Hospital Obligated Group)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/01/2048 | | | | 10,096,100 | |
3,950,000 | | IN Hsg. & Community Devel. Authority (Evergreen Village Bloomington)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 3,967,775 | |
6,225,000 | | IN Hsg. & Community Devel. Authority (Hammond Assisted Living Community)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 01/01/2036 | | | | 5,828,530 | |
770,000 | | Indiana, IA Finance Authority (Irvington Community School) | | | 5.900 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 774,435 | |
685,000 | | Indiana, IA Finance Authority (Irvington Community School) | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 688,459 | |
1,095,000 | | Kokomo, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch of Kokomo)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 01/01/2034 | | | | 1,132,526 | |
4,570,000 | | Kokomo, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch of Kokomo)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 4,708,654 | |
1,060,000 | | Lafayette, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Glasswater Creek of Lafayette)1 | | | 5.600 | | | | 01/01/2033 | | | | 1,089,977 | |
5,160,000 | | Lafayette, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Glasswater Creek of Lafayette)1 | | | 5.800 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 5,290,703 | |
4,965,000 | | Merrillville, IN Economic Devel. (Belvedere Hsg.)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 04/01/2036 | | | | 4,602,108 | |
14,565,000 | | Michigan City, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch Project)1 | | | 5.150 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 13,672,457 | |
17,510,000 | | Mishawaka, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Hellenic Senior Living of Mishawaka)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 10/01/2038 | | | | 17,546,946 | |
4,975,000 | | Mishawaka, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch Mishawaka)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 4,913,708 | |
2,560,000 | | Muncie, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch Project)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 2,510,387 | |
8,000,000 | | Plainfield, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Glasswater Creek)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 09/01/2038 | | | | 7,899,520 | |
3,765,000 | | Shelbyville, IN Redevel. District Tax Increment (Central Shelbyville Economic)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 3,773,057 | |
3,880,000 | | Terre Haute, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch of Terre Haute)1 | | | 5.350 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 3,820,869 | |
3,225,000 | | Vincennes, IN Economic Devel. (Southwest Indiana Regional Youth Village) | | | 6.250 | | | | 01/01/2029 | | | | 3,283,953 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 143,294,971 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Iowa—0.2% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,405,000 | | Clear Lake, IA Senior Hsg. (Timbercrest Apartments)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 10/01/2043 | | | | 1,490,621 | |
2,780,000 | | Clear Lake, IA Senior Hsg. (Timbercrest Apartments)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 10/01/2048 | | | | 2,925,978 | |
1,160,000 | | IA Finance Authority (Boys & Girls Home and Family Services)4,5 | | | 5.900 | | | | 12/01/2028 | | | | 58,000 | |
|
27 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Iowa (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$750,000 | | IA Finance Authority Senior Hsg. (PHS Council Bluffs)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 08/01/2038 | | | $ | 752,055 | |
1,750,000 | | IA Finance Authority Senior Hsg. (PHS Council Bluffs)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 08/01/2048 | | | | 1,748,670 | |
2,500,000 | | IA Finance Authority Senior Hsg. (PHS Council Bluffs)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 08/01/2055 | | | | 2,508,175 | |
685,000 | | IA Finance Authority Senior Hsg. (Wedum Walnut Ridge) | | | 5.375 | | | | 06/01/2025 | | | | 678,622 | |
2,845,000 | | IA Tobacco Settlement Authority (TASC)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 06/01/2023 | | | | 2,887,362 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 13,049,483 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kansas—0.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3,069,831 | | Olathe, KS Tax Increment (Gateway)5,8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2026 | | | | 1,841,899 | |
795,000 | | Pittsburgh, KS Special Obligation (North Broadway Redevel.) | | | 4.900 | | | | 04/01/2024 | | | | 718,688 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,560,587 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kentucky—0.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,660,000 | | Kuttawa, KY (1stMtg.-GF/Kentucky)1,7 | | | 6.750 | | | | 03/01/2029 | | | | 1,660,448 | |
1,250,000 | | KY EDFA (Masonic Home Independent Living II)1 | | | 7.250 | | | | 05/15/2041 | | | | 1,401,200 | |
1,000,000 | | KY EDFA (Masonic Home Independent Living II)1 | | | 7.375 | | | | 05/15/2046 | | | | 1,123,740 | |
1,000,000 | | KY EDFA (Owensboro Health/Owensboro Health Medical Group Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2045 | | | | 1,051,350 | |
6,785,000 | | KY Municipal Power Agency1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2034 | | | | 7,518,798 | |
5,000,000 | | KY Municipal Power Agency1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2036 | | | | 5,509,100 | |
1,900,000 | | KY Property & Building Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2031 | | | | 2,214,640 | |
1,900,000 | | KY Property & Building Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2032 | | | | 2,201,321 | |
900,000 | | KY Property & Building Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2033 | | | | 1,037,241 | |
900,000 | | KY Property & Building Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2034 | | | | 1,031,778 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 24,749,616 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Louisiana—0.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,200,000 | | Juban Park, LA Community Devel. District Special Assessment4,5 | | | 5.150 | | | | 10/01/2014 | | | | 324,000 | |
11,415,000 | | LA HFA (La Chateau)1 | | | 7.250 | | | | 09/01/2039 | | | | 11,036,136 | |
1,220,000 | | LA Local Government EF&CD Authority (Better Waterworks)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 05/01/2043 | | | | 1,166,747 | |
2,575,000 | | LA Local Government EF&CD Authority (Tangipahoa Parish Gomesa) | | | 5.375 | | | | 11/01/2038 | | | | 2,604,948 | |
2,300,000 | | New Orleans, LA Aviation Board (Parking Facilities)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2043 | | | | 2,584,579 | |
4,220,000 | | New Orleans, LA Aviation Board (Parking Facilities)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2048 | | | | 4,718,002 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 22,434,412 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maine—0.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2,000,000 | | ME Finance Authority (Casella Waste Systems)1 | | | 4.375 | 10 | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 2,017,440 | |
2,000,000 | | ME H&HEFA (Maine General Medical Center)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 2,128,780 | |
|
28 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Maine (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$4,800,000 | | Rumford, ME Pollution Control (Boise Cascade Corp.)1 | | | 6.625 | % | | | 07/01/2020 | | | $ | 4,825,008 | |
12,265,000 | | Rumford, ME Solid Waste Disposal (Boise Cascade Corp.)1 | | | 6.875 | | | | 10/01/2026 | | | | 12,329,023 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 21,300,251 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maryland—1.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
9,525,000 | | Baltimore County, MD GO2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/01/2040 | | | | 9,997,182 | |
1,100,000 | | Baltimore, MD Special Obligation (Center/West Devel.)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 06/01/2036 | | | | 1,120,229 | |
1,360,000 | | Baltimore, MD Special Obligation (Center/West Devel.)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 06/01/2043 | | | | 1,387,798 | |
45,950,000 | | MD Stadium Authority (Construction & Revitalization Program)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2047 | | | | 51,610,432 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 64,115,641 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Massachusetts—0.8% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6,905,000 | | MA Devel. Finance Agency (Lasell College)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 7,334,629 | |
1,600,702 | | MA Devel. Finance Agency (Linden Ponds) | | | 1.009 | 6 | | | 11/15/2056 | | | | 405,314 | |
4,565,000 | | MA Devel. Finance Agency (Linden Ponds)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 11/15/2046 | | | | 4,654,383 | |
1,000,000 | | MA Devel. Finance Agency (VOA Concord)1 | | | 5.200 | | | | 11/01/2041 | | | | 985,490 | |
9,820,000 | | MA H&EFA (Milford Regional Medical Center)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2032 | | | | 9,910,835 | |
5,755,000 | | MA HFA, Series C2 | | | 5.350 | | | | 12/01/2042 | | | | 5,785,960 | |
10,735,000 | | MA School Building Authority1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 02/15/2039 | | | | 10,975,571 | |
2,240,000 | | Saugus, MA GO2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/01/2039 | | | | 2,343,645 | |
2,500,000 | | Saugus, MA GO2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/01/2040 | | | | 2,596,363 | |
2,670,000 | | Saugus, MA GO2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/01/2041 | | | | 2,766,661 | |
2,750,000 | | Saugus, MA GO2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/01/2042 | | | | 2,843,074 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 50,601,925 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michigan—2.6% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,600,000 | | American Montessori Academy, MI Public School Academy | | | 7.000 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 1,542,960 | |
3,465,000 | | Arts & Technology Academy Pontiac, MI Public School Academy | | | 6.000 | | | | 11/01/2046 | | | | 3,119,713 | |
2,740,000 | | Charyl Stockwell Academy, MI Public School Academy1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 10/01/2035 | | | | 2,655,553 | |
4,140,000 | | Charyl Stockwell Academy, MI Public School Academy1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 10/01/2045 | | | | 3,997,460 | |
10,100,000 | | Detroit, MI City School District2 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2029 | | | | 12,099,876 | |
1,550,000 | | Detroit, MI Downtown Devel. Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2043 | | | | 1,660,453 | |
13,450,000 | | Detroit, MI Downtown Devel. Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 14,353,840 | |
803,643 | | Detroit, MI GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2020 | | | | 798,950 | |
906,750 | | Detroit, MI GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2021 | | | | 892,695 | |
155,000 | | Detroit, MI GO | | | 5.250 | | | | 04/01/2020 | | | | 154,268 | |
350,300 | | Detroit, MI GO1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 04/01/2020 | | | | 348,647 | |
342,550 | | Detroit, MI GO | | | 5.250 | | | | 04/01/2021 | | | | 339,433 | |
206,150 | | Detroit, MI GO1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 04/01/2022 | | | | 202,846 | |
15,500 | | Detroit, MI GO | | | 5.250 | | | | 04/01/2023 | | | | 15,115 | |
|
29 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Michigan (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,165,000 | | Detroit, MI Local Devel. Finance Authority1 | | | 6.700 | % | | | 05/01/2021 | | | $ | 1,168,891 | |
565,000 | | Detroit, MI Local Devel. Finance Authority1 | | | 6.850 | | | | 05/01/2021 | | | | 566,955 | |
8,000,000 | | Great Lakes, MI Water Authority Supply System1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 9,308,720 | |
200,000 | | MI Finance Authority (HFHS/HFMHCT/HFWH/ WAFMH Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2041 | | | | 215,884 | |
6,000,000 | | MI Finance Authority (Thomas M Cooley Law School)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 07/01/2044 | | | | 6,025,860 | |
2,000,000 | | MI Finance Authority (Universal Learning Academy)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 11/01/2040 | | | | 1,956,120 | |
1,215,000 | | MI Hospital Finance Authority (McLaren Health Care Corp.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2034 | | | | 1,356,049 | |
595,000 | | MI Public Educational Facilities Authority (American Montessori) | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 595,006 | |
1,400,000 | | MI Public Educational Facilities Authority (Old Redford Academy)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2035 | | | | 1,376,592 | |
1,038,375 | | MI Strategic Fund Limited Obligation (Wolverine Human Services)1 | | | 7.875 | | | | 08/31/2028 | | | | 1,039,943 | |
2,200,000 | | MI Strategic Fund Solid Waste (Genesee Power Station)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 01/01/2021 | | | | 2,168,144 | |
2,725,780,000 | | MI Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority | | | 7.965 | 6 | | | 06/01/2058 | | | | 69,234,812 | |
1,400,000 | | Old Redford Academy, MI Public School Academy1 | | | 5.900 | | | | 12/01/2030 | | | | 1,400,588 | |
3,500,000 | | Summit Academy North, MI Public School Academy1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2031 | | | | 3,460,765 | |
2,800,000 | | Summit Academy North, MI Public School Academy1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2035 | | | | 2,674,392 | |
13,540,000 | | Wayne, MI Charter County Airport Facilities (Northwest Airlines)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2029 | | | | 13,572,902 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 158,303,432 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Minnesota—0.8% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3,330,000 | | Bethel, MN Hsg. & Healthcare (Benedictine Living Communities - St. Peter Communities)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 3,324,872 | |
1,000,000 | | Bethel, MN Senior Hsg. (Lodge at Lakes at Stillwater)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2048 | | | | 1,024,980 | |
600,000 | | Bethel, MN Senior Hsg. (Lodge at Lakes at Stillwater)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2053 | | | | 613,332 | |
1,625,000 | | Bethel, MN Senior Hsg. (Lodge at Lakes at Stillwater)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/01/2058 | | | | 1,678,690 | |
6,915,000 | | Brooklyn Center, MN Multifamily Hsg. (Sanctuary Brooklyn Center)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 11/01/2035 | | | | 6,788,317 | |
3,115,000 | | Brooklyn Center, MN Multifamily Hsg. (Sanctuary Brooklyn Center)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 11/01/2035 | | | | 2,917,322 | |
5,735,000 | | Dakota County, MN Community Devel. Agency (Sanctuary at West St. Paul) | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 5,717,164 | |
380,000 | | Duluth, MN EDA Health Care Facilities (Cambia Hills of Bethel)1 | | | 5.450 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 375,144 | |
1,000,000 | | Duluth, MN EDA Health Care Facilities (Cambia Hills of Bethel)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 12/01/2055 | | | | 1,005,250 | |
|
30 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Minnesota (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$6,570,000 | | International Falls, MN Solid Waste Disposal (Boise Cascade Corp.) | | | 6.850 | % | | | 12/01/2029 | | | $ | 6,604,295 | |
1,075,000 | | Minneapolis, MN Charter School (Spero Academy) | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,062,197 | |
4,740,000 | | Minneapolis, MN Charter School (Spero Academy) | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 4,715,020 | |
715,000 | | Minneapolis, MN Multifamily Hsg. (Blaisdell Apartments)1 | | | 5.400 | | | | 04/01/2028 | | | | 714,936 | |
5,340,000 | | Minneapolis, MN Multifamily Hsg. (Blaisdell Apartments)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 04/01/2042 | | | | 5,165,168 | |
500,000 | | Minneapolis, MN Student Hsg. (Riverton Community Hsg.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2053 | | | | 509,060 | |
515,000 | | Red Wing, MN Senior Hsg. (Benedictine Living Community of Northfield)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2053 | | | | 504,221 | |
1,450,000 | | St. Paul, MN Hsg. & Redevel. Authority (Bridgecreek Senior Place)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 09/15/2037 | | | | 1,450,290 | |
1,491,988 | | St. Paul, MN Hsg. & Redevel. Authority (Episcopal Nursing Home)1 | | | 5.630 | | | | 10/01/2033 | | | | 1,492,122 | |
2,091,000 | | St. Paul, MN Hsg. & Redevel. Authority (Great Northern Lofts)1,7 | | | 6.250 | | | | 03/01/2029 | | | | 1,965,896 | |
1,075,000 | | St. Paul, MN Hsg. & Redevel. Authority (Great River School) | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2052 | | | | 1,095,543 | |
2,305,000 | | St. Paul, MN Hsg. & Redevel. Authority Charter School (Hmong College Prep Academy)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 09/01/2043 | | | | 2,344,462 | |
200,000 | | Wadena, MN Hsg. & Redevel. Authority (Humphrey Manor East)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 02/01/2019 | | | | 200,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 51,268,281 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mississippi—0.3% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,670,000 | | Meridian, MS Tax Increment (Meridian Crossroads)1 | | | 8.750 | | | | 12/01/2024 | | | | 1,723,490 | |
13,015,000 | | Mississippi State University Educational Building2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2043 | | | | 13,335,455 | |
1,395,000 | | Ridgeland, MS Tax Increment (Colony Park)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 10/01/2027 | | | | 1,419,664 | |
1,755,000 | | Ridgeland, MS Tax Increment (Colony Park)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 10/01/2028 | | | | 1,786,871 | |
16,410,000 | | Stonebridge, MS Public Improvement District Special Assessment4 | | | 7.500 | | | | 10/01/2042 | | | | 1,312,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 19,578,280 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Missouri—0.9% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4,900,000 | | Branson, MO Commerce Park Community Improvement District4 | | | 5.750 | | | | 06/01/2026 | | | | 1,078,000 | |
2,390,000 | | Branson, MO IDA (Branson Hills Redevel.) | | | 5.750 | | | | 05/01/2026 | | | | 1,677,660 | |
12,600,000 | | Branson, MO IDA (Branson Hills Redevel.) | | | 7.050 | | | | 05/01/2027 | | | | 8,836,632 | |
495,000 | | Branson, MO IDA (Branson Landing) | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/01/2021 | | | | 490,773 | |
2,970,000 | | Branson, MO IDA (Branson Landing) | | | 5.500 | | | | 06/01/2029 | | | | 2,863,288 | |
570,000 | | Broadway-Fairview, MO Transportation Devel. District (Columbia)5,8 | | | 6.125 | | | | 12/01/2036 | | | | 370,500 | |
5,000,000 | | Chesterfield Valley, MO Transportation Devel. District1 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 05/15/2046 | | | | 2,596,350 | |
|
31 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Missouri (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$785,000 | | Chillicothe, MO Tax Increment (South U.S. 65) | | | 5.500 | % | | | 04/01/2021 | | | $ | 686,608 | |
3,100,000 | | Chillicothe, MO Tax Increment (South U.S. 65) | | | 5.625 | | | | 04/01/2027 | | | | 2,274,036 | |
1,000,000 | | Kansas City, MO IDA (Sales Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2036 | | | | 1,004,710 | |
740,000 | | Kansas City, MO IDA (Sales Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2046 | | | | 721,700 | |
1,112,000 | | Kansas City, MO IDA (West Paseo)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 1,111,944 | |
1,200,000 | | Lees Summit, MO IDA (Kensington Farms)4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 03/01/2021 | | | | 768,000 | |
750,000 | | Lees Summit, MO IDA (Kensington Farms)4 | | | 5.750 | | | | 03/01/2029 | | | | 480,000 | |
2,800,000 | | Lees Summit, MO Tax (Summit Fair Community Improvement District)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2042 | | | | 2,800,364 | |
3,020,000 | | MO Dardenne Town Square Transportation Devel. District8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2026 | | | | 1,555,300 | |
3,825,000 | | MO Dardenne Town Square Transportation Devel. District8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 1,969,875 | |
195,000 | | MO Grindstone Plaza Transportation Devel. District | | | 5.250 | | | | 10/01/2021 | | | | 191,114 | |
400,000 | | MO Grindstone Plaza Transportation Devel. District | | | 5.400 | | | | 10/01/2026 | | | | 373,976 | |
115,000 | | MO Grindstone Plaza Transportation Devel. District | | | 5.550 | | | | 10/01/2036 | | | | 99,069 | |
2,000,000 | | Move Rolla, MO Transportation Devel. District1 | | | 4.625 | | | | 06/01/2042 | | | | 2,047,940 | |
700,000 | | Northwoods, MO Transportation Devel. District | | | 5.850 | | | | 02/01/2031 | | | | 643,370 | |
2,750,000 | | Saint Charles County, MO IDA (Suemandy/Mid- Rivers Community Improvement District)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2046 | | | | 2,600,290 | |
3,100,000 | | St. Louis County, MO IDA (University Place Transportation Development District)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 03/01/2033 | | | | 3,131,558 | |
4,580,000 | | St. Louis, MO IDA (Railway Exchange Building Redevel.)4,5 | | | 8.000 | | | | 04/27/2033 | | | | 137,400 | |
2,000,000 | | St. Louis, MO Land Clearance Redevel. Authority (14th & Market Community Improvement District)1 | | | 6.375 | | | | 04/01/2043 | | | | 1,974,660 | |
4,000,000 | | St. Louis, MO Land Clearance Redevel. Authority (Scottrade Center)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2038 | | | | 4,410,520 | |
2,442,000 | | St. Louis, MO Tax Increment (1601 Washington Redevel.)5,8 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/21/2026 | | | | 683,760 | |
2,032,491 | | St. Louis, MO Tax Increment (Pet Building Redevel.) | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/29/2028 | | | | 1,343,355 | |
1,660,000 | | St. Louis, MO Tax Increment (Printers Lofts)5,8 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/21/2026 | | | | 448,200 | |
3,043,000 | | St. Louis, MO Tax Increment (Security Building Redevel.)5,8 | | | 6.300 | | | | 04/01/2027 | | | | 699,890 | |
2,321,000 | | St. Louis, MO Tax Increment (Washington East Condominiums)5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 01/20/2028 | | | | 1,160,500 | |
1,510,000 | | St. Louis, MO Tax Increment (Washington East Condominiums)5,8 | | | 5.500 | | | | 01/20/2028 | | | | 362,400 | |
1,108,000 | | St. Louis, MO Tax Increment Financing, Series A5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 09/02/2028 | | | | 498,600 | |
1,865,000 | | Stone Canyon, MO Improvement District (Infrastructure)4,5 | | | 5.700 | | | | 04/01/2022 | | | | 522,200 | |
|
32 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Missouri (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$975,000 | | Stone Canyon, MO Improvement District (Infrastructure)4,5 | | | 5.750 | % | | | 04/01/2027 | | | $ | 273,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 52,887,542 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Montana—0.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5,935,000 | | Hardin, MT Tax Increment Industrial Infrastructure Devel. (Rocky Mountain Power)5,8 | | | 6.250 | 3 | | | 09/01/2031 | | | | 860,575 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nebraska—0.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2,500,000 | | NE Central Plains Gas Energy1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2042 | | | | 2,887,600 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nevada—0.6% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
27,500,000 | | Clark County, NV GO2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2048 | | | | 31,265,850 | |
975,000 | | Clark County, NV Improvement District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2026 | | | | 982,010 | |
750,000 | | Clark County, NV Improvement District1 | | | 5.050 | | | | 02/01/2031 | | | | 754,447 | |
85,000 | | Mesquite, NV Special Improvement District (Canyon Creek)1,7 | | | 5.400 | | | | 08/01/2020 | | | | 85,648 | |
300,000 | | Mesquite, NV Special Improvement District (Canyon Creek)1,7 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2025 | | | | 301,149 | |
30,000,000 | | Reno, NV Sales Tax | | | 6.143 | 6 | | | 07/01/2058 | | | | 3,437,700 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 36,826,804 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Hampshire—0.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,340,000 | | NH Business Finance Authority (Huggins Hospital)1 | | | 6.875 | | | | 10/01/2039 | | | | 1,385,078 | |
100,000 | | NH H&EFA (Hillside Village) | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 100,380 | |
1,725,000 | | NH H&EFA (Hillside Village) | | | 6.125 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,806,161 | |
3,875,000 | | NH H&EFA (Hillside Village) | | | 6.125 | | | | 07/01/2052 | | | | 4,025,505 | |
865,000 | | NH H&EFA (Hillside Village) | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 908,752 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,225,876 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Jersey—1.9% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3,583,000 | | Newark, NJ GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2029 | | | | 3,824,638 | |
5,000,000 | | NJ EDA1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2041 | | | | 5,268,700 | |
40,000 | | NJ EDA (Continental Airlines)1 | | | 4.875 | | | | 09/15/2019 | | | | 40,559 | |
3,750,000 | | NJ EDA (Continental Airlines)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 11/15/2030 | | | | 4,231,912 | |
2,055,000 | | NJ EDA (Friends of Teaneck Community Charter School)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 09/01/2052 | | | | 1,998,775 | |
690,000 | | NJ EDA (Golden Door Charter School)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 11/01/2052 | | | | 736,064 | |
1,865,000 | | NJ EDA (Hatikvah International Academy Charter School) | | | 5.375 | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 1,858,174 | |
565,000 | | NJ EDA (Leap Academy Charter School)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 10/01/2034 | | | | 571,147 | |
750,000 | | NJ EDA (Leap Academy Charter School)1 | | | 6.200 | | | | 10/01/2044 | | | | 752,760 | |
500,000 | | NJ EDA (Leap Academy Charter School)1 | | | 6.300 | | | | 10/01/2049 | | | | 503,725 | |
5,000,000 | | NJ EDA (Marion P Thomas Charter School) | | | 5.375 | | | | 10/01/2050 | | | | 4,833,650 | |
195,000 | | NJ EDA (Marion P Thomas Charter School) | | | 5.500 | | | | 10/01/2020 | | | | 195,425 | |
3,430,000 | | NJ EDA (Newark Downtown District Management Corp.)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/15/2037 | | | | 3,809,770 | |
|
33 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
New Jersey (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,875,000 | | NJ EDA (North Star Academy Charter School of Newark)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 07/15/2047 | | | $ | 1,971,150 | |
1,000,000 | | NJ EDA (Paterson Charter School Science & Technology)1 | | | 6.100 | | | | 07/01/2044 | | | | 994,820 | |
650,000 | | NJ EDA (Provident Group-Kean Properties)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 685,555 | |
2,630,000 | | NJ EDA (University Heights Charter School) | | | 5.750 | | | | 09/01/2050 | | | | 2,709,873 | |
5,000,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (College of St. Elizabeth)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2046 | | | | 4,833,300 | |
5,000,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (Village Drive Healthcare Urban Renewal) | | | 5.750 | | | | 10/01/2038 | | | | 4,901,550 | |
44,350,000 | | NJ Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 44,294,563 | |
18,650,000 | | NJ Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. (TASC)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 19,309,464 | |
10,000,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority | | | 4.497 | 6 | | | 12/15/2037 | | | | 4,573,800 | |
3,300,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2031 | | | | 3,652,605 | |
210,000 | | Weehawken Township, NJ GO1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/01/2021 | | | | 222,380 | |
210,000 | | Weehawken Township, NJ GO1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/01/2022 | | | | 222,188 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 116,996,547 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Mexico—0.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
615,000 | | Boulders, NM Pubic Improvement District1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 10/01/2044 | | | | 610,055 | |
70,000 | | Mariposa East, NM Public Improvement District1 | | | 5.900 | | | | 09/01/2032 | | | | 68,716 | |
325,000 | | Mariposa East, NM Public Improvement District | | | 5.900 | 3 | | | 09/01/2032 | | | | 319,040 | |
535,000 | | Mariposa East, NM Public Improvement District | | | 5.900 | | | | 09/01/2032 | | | | 506,308 | |
410,000 | | Mariposa East, NM Public Improvement District | | | 12.874 | 6 | | | 03/01/2032 | | | | 188,600 | |
1,925,000 | | NM Trails Public Improvement District | | | 7.750 | | | | 10/01/2038 | | | | 1,736,543 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,429,262 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New York—13.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5,000,000 | | Erie County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2038 | | | | 4,979,300 | |
17,700,000 | | Erie County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp. | | | 5.630 | 6 | | | 06/01/2055 | | | | 854,556 | |
4,245,000 | | Essex County, NY IDA (Champlain Valley Milling Corp.) | | | 6.250 | | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 4,189,263 | |
5,400,000 | | Guilderland, NY IDA (Promenade Albany Senior Living) | | | 5.875 | | | | 01/01/2052 | | | | 5,242,914 | |
8,500,000 | | Hudson Yards, NY Infrastructure Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2037 | | | | 9,685,580 | |
7,500,000 | | Hudson Yards, NY Infrastructure Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2042 | | | | 8,438,025 | |
5,000,000 | | L.I., NY Power Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2042 | | | | 5,638,150 | |
1,000,000 | | Monroe County, NY Industrial Devel. Corp. (St. John Fisher College)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/01/2030 | | | | 1,087,300 | |
2,937,408 | | Nassau County, NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside)4 | | | 2.000 | | | | 01/01/2049 | | | | 499,359 | |
911,543 | | Nassau County, NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside) | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 914,551 | |
144,966 | | Nassau County, NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside) | | | 5.875 | | | | 01/01/2023 | | | | 147,610 | |
922,500 | | Nassau County, NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside) | | | 6.500 | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 945,074 | |
|
34 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
New York (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,761,557 | | Nassau County, NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside) | | | 6.700 | % | | | 01/01/2049 | | | $ | 1,764,428 | |
6,100,000 | | Nassau County, NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside) | | | 6.700 | | | | 01/01/2049 | | | | 6,109,943 | |
234,000,000 | | NY Counties Tobacco Trust V | | | 6.732 | 6 | | | 06/01/2060 | | | | 6,903,000 | |
37,380,000 | | NY Liberty Devel. Corp. (Bank of America Tower)2 | | | 5.125 | | | | 01/15/2044 | | | | 38,417,759 | |
5,005,000 | | NY MTA1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2056 | | | | 5,522,767 | |
6,300,000 | | NY MTA (Green Bond)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2035 | | | | 7,329,420 | |
3,000,000 | | NY MTA (Green Bond)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2042 | | | | 3,427,650 | |
10,470,000 | | NY MTA (Green Bond)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2051 | | | | 11,720,223 | |
10,000,000 | | NY MTA (Green Bond)2 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2057 | | | | 11,467,075 | |
13,190,000 | | NY MTA Hudson Rail Yards1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2056 | | | | 14,125,303 | |
4,680,000 | | NY MTA, Series D1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/15/2042 | | | | 4,705,038 | |
900,000 | | NY MTA, Series D1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2029 | | | | 1,048,329 | |
900,000 | | NY MTA, Series D1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2033 | | | | 1,048,329 | |
1,975,000 | | NYC GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2039 | | | | 2,272,119 | |
8,670,000 | | NYC IDA (Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Partners)1 | | | 6.200 | | | | 10/01/2022 | | | | 8,728,176 | |
5,000,000 | | NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2038 | | | | 5,726,750 | |
17,620,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2039 | | | | 20,260,886 | |
16,810,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2041 | | | | 19,198,692 | |
5,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Building Aid)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/15/2037 | | | | 5,298,700 | |
25,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Building Aid)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2035 | | | | 29,127,000 | |
10,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Building Aid)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2037 | | | | 11,545,600 | |
7,700,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Building Aid)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/15/2036 | | | | 9,122,883 | |
15,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 15,500,475 | |
1,360,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2032 | | | | 1,587,759 | |
9,545,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2040 | | | | 10,851,710 | |
2,450,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2040 | | | | 2,815,026 | |
53,425,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 60,564,183 | |
75,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2042 | | | | 84,697,500 | |
13,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2042 | | | | 14,869,108 | |
20,140,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2045 | | | | 22,705,735 | |
12,095,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2045 | | | | 13,645,095 | |
25,000,000 | | NYS DA (Sales Tax)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2037 | | | | 28,972,563 | |
6,500,000 | | NYS DA (Sales Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2037 | | | | 7,584,460 | |
13,270,000 | | NYS DA (Sales Tax)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2039 | | | | 15,254,928 | |
15,000,000 | | NYS DA (Sales Tax)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2040 | | | | 17,193,113 | |
10,000,000 | | NYS DA (Sales Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2040 | | | | 11,464,000 | |
10,000,000 | | NYS DA (Sales Tax)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2041 | | | | 11,505,325 | |
31,720,000 | | NYS DA (Sales Tax)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2041 | | | | 36,304,333 | |
5,000,000 | | NYS DA (Sales Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2042 | | | | 5,744,050 | |
15,000,000 | | NYS DA (Sales Tax)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2044 | | | | 16,858,875 | |
17,600,000 | | NYS DA (St. Mary’s Hospital for Children)1 | | | 7.875 | | | | 11/15/2041 | | | | 18,267,920 | |
10,000,000 | | NYS DA (State Personal Income Tax Authority)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2037 | | | | 11,346,300 | |
6,500,000 | | NYS DA (State Personal Income Tax Authority)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2043 | | | | 7,282,015 | |
6,705,000 | | NYS DA (State University of New York)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 7,552,110 | |
8,320,000 | | NYS EFC (Clean Water & Drinking Revolving Funds)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2048 | | | | 9,566,752 | |
|
35 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
New York (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$21,750,000 | | NYS Liberty Devel. Corp. (4 World Trade Center)1 | | | 5.750 | % | | | 11/15/2051 | | | $ | 23,851,702 | |
13,000,000 | | NYS Transportation Devel. Corp. (American Airlines/JFK International Airport)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2026 | | | | 13,613,340 | |
5,150,000 | | NYS Transportation Devel. Corp. (Delta Air Lines/ LaGuardia Airport Terminals)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 01/01/2036 | | | | 5,188,316 | |
2,525,000 | | NYS Transportation Devel. Corp. (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevel.)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 2,595,422 | |
2,500,000 | | NYS Transportation Devel. Corp. (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevel.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2034 | | | | 2,680,700 | |
2,500,000 | | NYS Transportation Devel. Corp. (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevel.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2046 | | | | 2,635,325 | |
9,500,000 | | NYS Transportation Devel. Corp. (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevel.)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2050 | | | | 10,110,090 | |
5,750,000 | | NYS UDC (State Personal Income Tax Authority)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2041 | | | | 6,528,263 | |
200,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ (JFK International Air Terminal)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2025 | | | | 208,098 | |
810,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ (KIAC)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 10/01/2019 | | | | 828,144 | |
11,050,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 200th Series2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/15/2057 | | | | 12,338,561 | |
13,000,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 205th Series2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2057 | | | | 14,608,880 | |
2,000,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 206th Series2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2042 | | | | 2,232,930 | |
19,725,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 206th Series2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2047 | | | | 21,943,680 | |
8,385,000 | | Suffolk, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp. | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/01/2048 | | | | 8,389,612 | |
540,000 | | Yonkers, NY IDA (St. Joseph’s Hospital), Series98-C7 | | | 6.200 | | | | 03/01/2020 | | | | 539,152 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 827,917,302 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North Carolina—0.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
15,000,000 | | NC Capital Facilities Finance Agency (Duke University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2055 | | | | 16,807,050 | |
1,650,000 | | NC Medical Care Commission (Whitestone)1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 03/01/2031 | | | | 1,845,443 | |
5,415,000 | | NC Turnpike Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 6,148,245 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 24,800,738 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ohio—8.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
9,950,000 | | Allen County, OH Hospital Facilities (Catholic Healthcare)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2038 | | | | 10,363,240 | |
7,385,000 | | Brecksville-Broadview Heights, OH City School District1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 12/01/2054 | | | | 8,249,045 | |
10,975,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC) | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/01/2024 | | | | 10,277,100 | |
17,320,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC) | | | 5.375 | | | | 06/01/2024 | | | | 16,371,037 | |
9,195,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC) | | | 5.750 | | | | 06/01/2034 | | | | 8,609,830 | |
43,385,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC) | | | 5.875 | | | | 06/01/2030 | | | | 40,567,578 | |
85,985,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 80,064,073 | |
|
36 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Ohio (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$12,937,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC)1 | | | 6.000 | % | | | 06/01/2042 | | | $ | 12,429,481 | |
62,055,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC) | | | 6.250 | 3 | | | 06/01/2037 | | | | 61,052,191 | |
66,920,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 66,337,127 | |
733,800,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC) | | | 6.535 | 6 | | | 06/01/2052 | | | | 18,763,266 | |
5,645,000 | | Butler County, OH Port Authority (Maple Knoll Communities)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 07/01/2043 | | | | 6,132,841 | |
1,000,000 | | Butler County, OH Port Authority (Storypoint/ SL2016/SLW/SLC/SLFW/SLF Obligated Group) | | | 6.250 | | | | 01/15/2034 | | | | 1,026,370 | |
1,000,000 | | Butler County, OH Port Authority (Storypoint/ SL2016/SLW/SLC/SLFW/SLF Obligated Group) | | | 6.375 | | | | 01/15/2043 | | | | 1,024,650 | |
2,250,000 | | Butler County, OH Port Authority (Storypoint/ SL2016/SLW/SLC/SLFW/SLF Obligated Group) | | | 6.500 | | | | 01/15/2052 | | | | 2,310,187 | |
815,000 | | Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH Port Authority (Playhouse Square Foundation)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 890,811 | |
735,000 | | Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH Port Authority (Playhouse Square Foundation)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2043 | | | | 808,743 | |
2,900,000 | | Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH Port Authority (Playhouse Square Foundation)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2053 | | | | 3,183,620 | |
205,000 | | Columbus-Franklin County, OH Finance Authority, Series A1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/15/2035 | | | | 207,409 | |
14,550,000 | | Cuyahoga County, OH Hospital (Metro Health System)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 02/15/2052 | | | | 15,663,511 | |
4,900,000 | | Cuyahoga County, OH Hospital (Metro Health System)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 02/15/2057 | | | | 5,268,137 | |
36,060,000 | | Gallia County, OH Hospital Facilities (Holzer/ HHlthS/HMCG/HMCJ Obligated Group) | | | 8.000 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 39,788,965 | |
1,450,000 | | Hancock County, OH Hospital (BVRHC/BVHF Obligated Group)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 1,597,639 | |
20,000 | | Lake County, OH Hospital Facilities (Lake Hospital System)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/15/2038 | | | | 20,062 | |
345,000 | | Lorain County, OH Port Authority (Alumalloy LLC)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 11/15/2025 | | | | 344,203 | |
10,000,000 | | Montgomery County, OH (Miami Valley Hospital)2 | | | 5.750 | | | | 11/15/2023 | | | | 10,593,775 | |
1,090,000 | | Norwood, OH Special Obligation (Central Parke)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 1,096,976 | |
2,000,000 | | OH Air Quality Devel. Authority (FirstEnergy Generation)4 | | | 3.100 | 10 | | | 03/01/2023 | | | | 1,590,000 | |
7,750,000 | | OH Air Quality Devel. Authority (FirstEnergy Generation)4 | | | 3.750 | 10 | | | 12/01/2023 | | | | 6,161,250 | |
10,795,000 | | OH Air Quality Devel. Authority (FirstEnergy Generation)4 | | | 4.250 | 10 | | | 08/01/2029 | | | | 10,633,075 | |
700,000 | | OH Air Quality Devel. Authority (FirstEnergy Generation)4 | | | 5.625 | | | | 06/01/2018 | | | | 689,500 | |
5,400,000 | | OH HFA (Sanctuary at Springboro) | | | 5.450 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 5,380,776 | |
23,700,000 | | OH Higher Educational Facility Commission (Hiram College)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 10/01/2041 | | | | 24,374,739 | |
|
37 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Ohio (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$5,750,000 | | OH Higher Educational Facility Commission (Menorah Park)1 | | | 5.250 | % | | | 01/01/2048 | | | $ | 5,724,298 | |
1,500,000 | | OH Water Devel. Authority (FirstEnergy Generation)4 | | | 3.000 | | | | 05/15/2019 | | | | 1,192,500 | |
1,125,000 | | Port of Greater Cincinnati, OH Devel. Authority (Public Parking Infrastructure)7 | | | 6.300 | | | | 02/15/2024 | | | | 1,101,803 | |
2,500,000 | | Port of Greater Cincinnati, OH Devel. Authority (Public Parking Infrastructure) | | | 6.400 | | | | 02/15/2034 | | | | 2,386,350 | |
4,100,000 | | Southeastern OH Port Authority Hospital Facility (Memorial Health System)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 4,386,426 | |
1,225,000 | | Toledo-Lucas County, OH Port Authority (Storypoint/SL2016/SLW/SLC Obligated Group) | | | 6.125 | | | | 01/15/2034 | | | | 1,247,675 | |
1,700,000 | | Toledo-Lucas County, OH Port Authority (Storypoint/SL2016/SLW/SLC Obligated Group) | | | 6.375 | | | | 01/15/2051 | | | | 1,733,303 | |
1,459,813 | | Toledo-Lucas County, OH Port Authority (Town Square at Levis Commons)1 | | | 5.400 | | | | 11/01/2036 | | | | 1,370,516 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 491,014,078 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Oklahoma—0.3% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5,000,000 | | Atoka County, OK Healthcare Authority (Atoka Memorial Hospital) | | | 6.625 | | | | 10/01/2037 | | | | 4,000,000 | |
14,000,000 | | OK Devel. Finance Authority (OU Medicine)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/15/2057 | | | | 15,544,900 | |
100,000 | | OK Ordnance Works Authority Sewer & Solid Waste Disposal Facilities (Ralston Purina Group)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 09/01/2026 | | | | 100,308 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 19,645,208 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Oregon—0.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
17,045,000 | | Clackamas County, OR School District No. 62C (Oregon City)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2049 | | | | 19,450,731 | |
700,000 | | OR Facilities Authority (Concordia University)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 09/01/2030 | | | | 739,893 | |
2,625,000 | | OR Facilities Authority (Personalized Learning- Redmond Proficiency Academy)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/15/2051 | | | | 2,484,484 | |
1,740,000 | | OR Facilities Authority (Personalized Learning- Redmond Proficiency Academy)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 06/15/2046 | | | | 1,762,029 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 24,437,137 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pennsylvania—3.2% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
17,800,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HDA (Allegheny Health Network)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2047 | | | | 19,351,982 | |
1,000,000 | | Allentown, PA Neighborhood Improvement Zone1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2033 | | | | 1,080,580 | |
3,000,000 | | Allentown, PA Neighborhood Improvement Zone1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2042 | | | | 3,193,890 | |
8,000,000 | | Allentown, PA Neighborhood Improvement Zone | | | 5.375 | | | | 05/01/2042 | | | | 8,124,480 | |
22,300,000 | | Beaver County, PA IDA (FirstEnergy Generation)4 | | | 4.500 | 10 | | | 06/01/2028 | | | | 21,965,500 | |
2,700,000 | | Chester County, PA H&EFA (Immaculata University)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 11/01/2041 | | | | 3,314,574 | |
5,180,000 | | Chester County, PA IDA (Hickman Friends Senior Community of West Chester) | | | 5.500 | | | | 01/01/2052 | | | | 5,011,598 | |
525,000 | | Chester County, PA IDA (Woodlands at Graystone) | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2038 | | | | 527,641 | |
|
38 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Pennsylvania (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,050,000 | | Chester County, PA IDA (Woodlands at Graystone) | | | 5.125 | % | | | 03/01/2048 | | | $ | 1,056,394 | |
2,750,000 | | Crawford County, PA Hospital Authority (MMedC/ COHS/MMedCF/MPS/HCCO/TAHC/TAH/TAHCF/ TAHS/CVHC/HCrawC/FCIM Obligated Group) | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 2,941,070 | |
3,215,000 | | Crawford County, PA Hospital Authority (MMedC/ COHS/MMedCF/MPS/HCCO/TAHC/TAH/TAHCF/ TAHS/CVHC/HCrawC/FCIM Obligated Group) | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/01/2051 | | | | 3,430,212 | |
5,000 | | Lancaster, PA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/01/2040 | | | | 5,126 | |
4,775,000 | | Lancaster, PA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/01/2043 | | | | 4,871,455 | |
185,000 | | Luzerne County, PA IDA1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 12/15/2019 | | | | 193,960 | |
500,000 | | Luzerne County, PA IDA1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2027 | | | | 525,285 | |
1,010,000 | | Montgomery County, PA HEHA (Pennsylvania LTC)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 986,295 | |
1,705,000 | | Montgomery County, PA HEHA (Pennsylvania LTC)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 1,666,996 | |
500,000 | | Montgomery County, PA HEHA (Pennsylvania LTC)1 | | | 5.300 | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 476,385 | |
3,140,000 | | Montgomery County, PA HEHA (Pennsylvania LTC)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 3,004,666 | |
1,742,591 | | Northampton County, PA IDA (Northampton Generating)5,8,9 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/31/2023 | | | | 522,777 | |
8,238,655 | | Northampton County, PA IDA (Northampton Generating)5,8,9 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/31/2023 | | | | 2,471,596 | |
15,000,000 | | PA EDFA (FirstEnergy Generation)4 | | | 4.500 | 10 | | | 06/01/2028 | | | | 14,775,000 | |
1,210,000 | | PA EDFA(UPMC/M-WHOUPMC/UPMC-P/UPMC-PS/UPMC-SM Obligated Group)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/15/2036 | | | | 1,247,643 | |
11,500,000 | | PA Geisinger Authority Health System, Series A2 | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/01/2039 | | | | 11,627,621 | |
2,150,000 | | PA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 09/15/2031 | | | | 2,312,002 | |
2,980,000 | | PA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 09/15/2032 | | | | 3,179,332 | |
12,500,000 | | PA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/01/2035 | | | | 13,081,125 | |
4,000,000 | | PA HEFA (Shippensburg University)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 10/01/2043 | | | | 4,458,800 | |
1,370,000 | | PA HEFA (Ursinus College)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2027 | | | | 1,450,049 | |
13,395 | | PA HFA Multifamily Hsg. (Country Commons Apartments)1 | | | 3.600 | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 13,572 | |
3,000,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (School District of Philadelphia)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2030 | | | | 3,174,750 | |
20,000,000 | | PA State Public School Building Authority (Philadelphia School District)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2032 | | | | 22,562,200 | |
1,500,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Architecture & Design Charter School)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 03/15/2043 | | | | 1,143,210 | |
725,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Green Woods Charter School)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 06/15/2022 | | | | 748,432 | |
2,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Green Woods Charter School)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 06/15/2032 | | | | 2,050,380 | |
8,430,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (University of the Arts)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2045 | | | | 8,237,206 | |
2,390,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Gas Works1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2033 | | | | 2,690,423 | |
|
39 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Pennsylvania (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$3,350,000 | | Philadelphia, PA H&HEFA (Temple University Health System)1 | | | 5.625 | % | | | 07/01/2036 | | | $ | 3,580,078 | |
5,250,000 | | Philadelphia, PA H&HEFA (Temple University Health System)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 5,568,938 | |
785,000 | | Reading, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2035 | | | | 892,011 | |
720,000 | | Reading, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2036 | | | | 815,206 | |
5,470,000 | | York, PA GO1 | | | 7.250 | | | | 11/15/2041 | | | | 6,210,693 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 194,541,133 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rhode Island—0.3% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
44,240,000 | | Central Falls, RI Detention Facility4 | | | 7.250 | | | | 07/15/2035 | | | | 7,963,200 | |
5,000,000 | | RI Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. (TASC)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2035 | | | | 5,245,350 | |
5,000,000 | | RI Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. (TASC)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2040 | | | | 5,177,750 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 18,386,300 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
South Carolina—1.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6,295,000 | | Hardeeville, SC Assessment Revenue (Anderson Tract Municipal Improvement District) | | | 7.750 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 6,299,344 | |
12,555,000 | | Lancaster County, SC School District2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/01/2036 | | | | 13,179,577 | |
12,791,000 | | Richland County, SC Assessment Revenue (Village at Sandhill Improvement District)5 | | | 6.200 | | | | 11/01/2036 | | | | 11,082,506 | |
6,915,055 | | SC Connector 2000 Assoc. Toll Road, Series B | | | 2.871 | 6 | | | 01/01/2020 | | | | 6,486,460 | |
186,954 | | SC Connector 2000 Assoc. Toll Road, Series B | | | 6.295 | 6 | | | 01/01/2026 | | | | 111,226 | |
7,875,561 | | SC Connector 2000 Assoc. Toll Road, Series B | | | 6.620 | 6 | | | 01/01/2024 | | | | 5,471,388 | |
1,500,000 | | SC Ports Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2043 | | | | 1,658,715 | |
1,500,000 | | SC Ports Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2055 | | | | 1,625,160 | |
11,000,000 | | SC Public Service Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2055 | | | | 11,514,800 | |
5,070,000 | | SC Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2029 | | | | 5,350,929 | |
6,465,000 | | SC Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2033 | | | | 7,145,958 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 69,926,063 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tennessee—0.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,000,000 | | Bristol, TN Industrial Devel. Board | | | 5.022 | 6 | | | 12/01/2022 | | | | 830,350 | |
10,765,000 | | Memphis, TN GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 11,025,728 | |
7,250,000 | | Memphis-Shelby County, TN Airport Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2043 | | | | 8,011,105 | |
600,000 | | Nashville, TN Metropolitan Development & Hsg. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Agency (Fifth & Broadway Devel. District)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/01/2036 | | | | 623,628 | |
9,000,000 | | Shelby County, TN HE&HFB (Trezevant Manor) | | | 5.500 | | | | 09/01/2047 | | | | 8,564,760 | |
6,350,000 | | Shelby County, TN HE&HFB (Trezevant Manor) | | | 8.000 | | | | 09/01/2044 | | | | 317,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 29,373,071 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Texas—9.9% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
890,000 | | Argyle, TX Special Assessment (Highlands Argyle Public Improvement District No. 1) | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2037 | | | | 866,860 | |
1,475,000 | | Argyle, TX Special Assessment (Highlands Argyle Public Improvement District No. 1) | | | 5.250 | | | | 09/01/2047 | | | | 1,428,301 | |
1,325,000 | | Arlington, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Leadership Prep School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2046 | | | | 1,325,795 | |
|
40 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Texas (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$785,000 | | Arlington, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (UMEP)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 08/15/2053 | | | $ | 727,671 | |
4,115,000 | | Arlington, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Winfree Academy Charter School)1,7 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/15/2043 | | | | 4,143,970 | |
675,000 | | Aubrey, TX Special Assessment (Jackson Ridge Public Improvement District No. 1)1 | | | 7.250 | | | | 09/01/2045 | | | | 684,234 | |
260,000 | | Beaumont, TX Multifamily HDC (Madison on the Lake Apartments)1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/01/2028 | | | | 235,867 | |
15,135,000 | | Cambridge, TX Student Hsg. (Cambridge Student Hsg. Devel.)4 | | | 7.000 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 6,054,000 | |
625,000 | | Celina, TX Special Assessment1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 09/01/2028 | | | | 633,687 | |
400,000 | | Celina, TX Special Assessment1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 09/01/2032 | | | | 403,840 | |
1,100,000 | | Celina, TX Special Assessment1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 09/01/2040 | | | | 1,108,921 | |
1,870,000 | | Celina, TX Special Assessment1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 09/01/2045 | | | | 1,919,331 | |
3,970,000 | | Celina, TX Special Assessment | | | 7.500 | | | | 09/01/2045 | | | | 4,215,624 | |
1,000,000 | | Celina, TX Special Assessment (Sutton Fields II) | | | 7.250 | | | | 09/01/2045 | | | | 984,870 | |
750,000 | | Clifton, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Idea Public Schools)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/15/2041 | | | | 821,790 | |
5,000,000 | | Clifton, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (International American Education Federation) | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/15/2038 | | | | 5,059,000 | |
1,250,000 | | Crane, TX Independent School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2030 | | | | 1,253,525 | |
5,000,000 | | Cypress-Fairbanks, TX Independent School District1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 02/15/2043 | | | | 5,203,900 | |
4,250,000 | | Denton, TX Independent School District1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/15/2048 | | | | 4,349,917 | |
34,970,000 | | Denton, TX Independent School District2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/15/2045 | | | | 39,531,130 | |
1,300,000 | | Flower Mound, TX Special Assessment (River Walk Public Improvement District No. 1)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 09/01/2028 | | | | 1,320,085 | |
1,500,000 | | Flower Mound, TX Special Assessment (River Walk Public Improvement District No. 1)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 09/01/2036 | | | | 1,517,490 | |
2,000,000 | | Flower Mound, TX Special Assessment (River Walk Public Improvement District No. 1)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 09/01/2043 | | | | 2,016,220 | |
2,100,000 | | Galveston, TX Special Assessment | | | 5.625 | | | | 09/01/2028 | | | | 1,748,061 | |
3,700,000 | | Galveston, TX Special Assessment | | | 6.000 | | | | 09/01/2038 | | | | 3,002,661 | |
3,500,000 | | Galveston, TX Special Assessment | | | 6.125 | | | | 09/01/2044 | | | | 2,821,070 | |
15,000,000 | | Grand Parkway, TX Transportation Corp.2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2043 | | | | 17,038,163 | |
32,525,000 | | Grand Parkway, TX Transportation Corp.2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2048 | | | | 36,753,410 | |
5,000,000 | | Grand Parkway, TX Transportation Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2048 | | | | 5,650,050 | |
10,000,000 | | Grand Parkway, TX Transportation Corp.2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2053 | | | | 10,735,200 | |
11,238,709 | | Gulf Coast, TX IDA (Microgy Holdings)4,5 | | | 7.000 | | | | 12/01/2036 | | | | 112 | |
20,000 | | Gulf Coast, TX IDA Solid Waste (Citgo Petroleum Corp.)1 | | | 8.000 | | | | 04/01/2028 | | | | 20,146 | |
3,225,000 | | Harris County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Space Center Houston)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 08/15/2028 | | | | 3,316,622 | |
8,250,000 | | Houston, TX Airport System (United Airlines)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2028 | | | | 9,459,615 | |
435,000 | | Houston, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Cosmos Foundation)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 05/15/2031 | | | | 479,231 | |
380,000 | | Houston, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Cosmos Foundation)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 05/15/2031 | | | | 418,638 | |
|
41 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Texas (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$500,000 | | Houston, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Ninos)1 | | | 6.000 | % | | | 08/15/2036 | | | $ | 509,705 | |
750,000 | | Houston, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Ninos)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/15/2041 | | | | 762,337 | |
7,500,000 | | Katy, TX Independent School District1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 02/15/2047 | | | | 7,691,700 | |
5,000,000 | | Katy, TX Independent School District1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 02/15/2048 | | | | 5,106,050 | |
400,000 | | Leander, TX Special Assessment (Oak Creek Public Improvement District)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 09/01/2028 | | | | 395,712 | |
600,000 | | Leander, TX Special Assessment (Oak Creek Public Improvement District)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 09/01/2038 | | | | 586,200 | |
575,000 | | Leander, TX Special Assessment (Oak Creek Public Improvement District)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 09/01/2044 | | | | 561,959 | |
12,875,000 | | Little Elm, TX Independent School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/15/2046 | | | | 14,788,869 | |
450,000 | | Mclendon-Chisholm, TX Special Assessment (Sonoma Public Improvement District)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 09/15/2035 | | | | 446,314 | |
400,000 | | Mclendon-Chisholm, TX Special Assessment (Sonoma Public Improvement District)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 09/15/2040 | | | | 393,028 | |
8,750,000 | | Mission, TX EDC (Carbonlite Recycling) | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2033 | | | | 8,607,375 | |
20,000,000 | | Mission, TX EDC (Natgasoline)1 | | | 4.625 | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 20,432,400 | |
3,000,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (CHSTX/CMCD/CMCtrF Obligated Group)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/15/2033 | | | | 3,161,850 | |
2,000,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (CHSTX/CMCD/CMCtrF Obligated Group)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/15/2034 | | | | 2,098,780 | |
3,280,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (CHSTX/CMCD/CMCtrF Obligated Group)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/15/2035 | | | | 3,424,648 | |
700,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (East Grand Preparatory Academy)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/15/2046 | | | | 706,062 | |
1,200,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (East Grand Preparatory Academy)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/15/2051 | | | | 1,207,560 | |
2,085,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Jubilee Academic Center)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 08/15/2047 | | | | 2,083,415 | |
8,250,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Legacy at Midtown Park) | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2054 | | | | 8,198,603 | |
1,000,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Legacy Preparatory Charter Academy) | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/15/2037 | | | | 1,026,600 | |
13,435,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Legacy Preparatory Charter Academy) | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/15/2047 | | | | 13,599,982 | |
2,500,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Presbyterian Village-North)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 10/01/2049 | | | | 2,503,575 | |
500,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Women’s University-COHF- Collegiate Hsg. Denton)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 551,910 | |
|
42 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Texas (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,750,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Women’s University-COHF- Collegiate Hsg. Denton)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 07/01/2048 | | | $ | 1,903,825 | |
2,400,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Women’s University-COHF- Collegiate Hsg. Denton)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2058 | | | | 2,578,728 | |
350,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Senior Living (CardinalBay-Village on the Park Carriage Inn)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 393,459 | |
1,750,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Senior Living (CardinalBay-Village on the Park Carriage Inn)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2046 | | | | 1,891,785 | |
1,750,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Senior Living (CardinalBay-Village on the Park Carriage Inn)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2051 | | | | 1,887,060 | |
400,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Senior Living (MRC Senior Living- Langford Project) | | | 5.375 | | | | 11/15/2036 | | | | 398,380 | |
650,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Senior Living (MRC Senior Living- Langford Project) | | | 5.500 | | | | 11/15/2046 | | | | 648,102 | |
1,000,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Senior Living (MRC Senior Living- Langford Project) | | | 5.500 | | | | 11/15/2052 | | | | 989,300 | |
1,080,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Student Hsg. (A&M University - Collegiate Hsg. Corpus Christi II)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2048 | | | | 1,040,785 | |
2,315,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Student Hsg. (A&M University - Collegiate Hsg. San Antonio I)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2048 | | | | 2,293,795 | |
1,300,000 | | New Hope, TX Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility (Wesleyan Homes) | | | 5.500 | | | | 01/01/2049 | | | | 1,357,135 | |
785,000 | | New Hope, TX Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Student Hsg. (Stephenville-Tarleton State University)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 04/01/2036 | | | | 852,408 | |
1,950,000 | | New Hope, TX Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Student Hsg. (Stephenville-Tarleton State University)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 04/01/2045 | | | | 2,112,689 | |
375,000 | | Newark, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Austin Achieve Public Schools) | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2038 | | | | 377,745 | |
750,000 | | Newark, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Austin Achieve Public Schools) | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2048 | | | | 753,143 | |
1,600,000 | | North Central TX HFC (Village Kaufman Apartments)1 | | | 6.150 | 10 | | | 01/01/2043 | | | | 1,626,336 | |
38,000,000 | | North Central TX HFDC (Children’s Medical Center)2 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/15/2039 | | | | 38,774,915 | |
655,000 | | Pottsboro, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Imagine International Academy of North Texas)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/15/2036 | | | | 658,465 | |
1,000,000 | | Pottsboro, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Imagine International Academy of North Texas)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/15/2046 | | | | 965,210 | |
|
43 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Texas (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$5,975,000 | | Prosper, TX Independent School District1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 02/15/2044 | | | $ | 6,812,695 | |
6,300,000 | | Prosper, TX Independent School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2048 | | | | 7,177,905 | |
2,000,000 | | Red River, TX Educational Finance Corp. (Houston Baptist University)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 10/01/2046 | | | | 2,137,540 | |
3,000,000 | | Red River, TX Health Facilities Devel. Corp. (Happy Harbor Methodist Home) | | | 8.000 | | | | 11/15/2049 | | | | 3,395,220 | |
455,000 | | Rowlett, TX Special Assessment (Bayside Public Improvement District) | | | 6.000 | | | | 09/15/2046 | | | | 427,049 | |
1,995,000 | | Sabine Neches, TX HFC (Fox Run Apartments)1 | | | 6.150 | | | | 01/01/2043 | | | | 2,017,145 | |
26,820,000 | | Sanger, TX Industrial Devel. Corp. (Texas Pellets)4,5 | | | 7.500 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 8,582,400 | |
11,000,000 | | Sherman, TX Independent School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2045 | | | | 12,566,620 | |
3,810,000 | | Tarrant County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Buckingham Senior Living Community)4 | | | 5.750 | | | | 11/15/2037 | | | | 3,009,900 | |
3,500,000 | | Tarrant County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Buckner Senior Living Ventana) | | | 6.750 | | | | 11/15/2047 | | | | 3,785,075 | |
2,000,000 | | Tarrant County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Buckner Senior Living Ventana) | | | 6.750 | | | | 11/15/2052 | | | | 2,156,000 | |
13,500,000 | | Tarrant County, TX Health Facilities Devel. Corp. (Cook Childrens Medical Center)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2033 | | | | 13,831,763 | |
27,525,000 | | Travis County, TX HFDC (Longhorn Village)1 | | | 7.125 | | | | 01/01/2046 | | | | 30,234,561 | |
1,000,000 | | Trinity River Authority, TX Central Regional Wastewater System1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2032 | | | | 1,177,650 | |
1,000,000 | | Trinity River Authority, TX Central Regional Wastewater System1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2033 | | | | 1,173,200 | |
1,000,000 | | Trinity River Authority, TX Central Regional Wastewater System1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2034 | | | | 1,169,360 | |
2,000,000 | | Trinity River Authority, TX Central Regional Wastewater System1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 2,330,480 | |
1,000,000 | | Trinity River Authority, TX Central Regional Wastewater System1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2037 | | | | 1,155,430 | |
34,600,000 | | TX Angelina & Neches River Authority (Aspen Power)4,5 | | | 6.500 | | | | 11/01/2029 | | | | 346 | |
53,695,000 | | TX Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp.1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 12/15/2026 | | | | 61,802,408 | |
1,250,000 | | TX Private Activity (NTE Mobility Partners)1 | | | 6.875 | | | | 12/31/2039 | | | | 1,297,738 | |
400,000 | | TX Public Finance Authority Charter School Finance Corp.(Ed-Burnham Wood)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 09/01/2036 | | | | 400,308 | |
410,000 | | TX Student Hsg. Corp. (University of North Texas)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 410,426 | |
215,000 | | TX Student Hsg. Corp. (University of North Texas)1 | | | 6.850 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 206,239 | |
5,000,000 | | TX Water Devel. Board1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 10/15/2041 | | | | 5,170,600 | |
13,000,000 | | TX Water Devel. Board1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/15/2049 | | | | 14,878,760 | |
33,660,000 | | TX Water Devel. Board2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/15/2049 | | | | 38,498,348 | |
13,515,000 | | TX Water Devel. Board2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/15/2053 | | | | 15,409,862 | |
2,033,000 | | Vintage Township, TX Public Facilities Corp.1 | | | 7.375 | | | | 10/01/2038 | | | | 2,033,305 | |
6,375,000 | | Waxahachie, TX Special Assessment | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/15/2045 | | | | 6,177,694 | |
2,920,000 | | Wise County, TX (Parket County Junior College District)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 08/15/2025 | | | | 3,175,325 | |
4,615,000 | | Wise County, TX (Parket County Junior College District)1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 08/15/2028 | | | | 5,019,366 | |
|
44 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Texas (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$10,000,000 | | Ysleta, TX Independent School District1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 08/15/2045 | | | $ | 11,134,100 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 606,351,724 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Utah—0.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
195,000 | | Hideout, UT Local District No. 1 Special Assessment | | | 7.750 | | | | 08/01/2024 | | | | 208,980 | |
610,000 | | Hideout, UT Local District No. 1 Special Assessment | | | 8.250 | | | | 08/01/2034 | | | | 636,669 | |
4,000,000 | | Salt Lake City, UT Airport1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 4,429,960 | |
495,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Endeavor Hall) | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/15/2022 | | | | 496,366 | |
1,750,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Endeavor Hall) | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/15/2032 | | | | 1,758,558 | |
3,870,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Endeavor Hall) | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/15/2042 | | | | 3,874,567 | |
1,385,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Esperanza Elementary School) | | | 5.250 | | | | 10/15/2048 | | | | 1,323,783 | |
4,810,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Freedom Academy Foundation) | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/15/2037 | | | | 4,781,669 | |
6,015,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Freedom Academy Foundation) | | | 5.375 | | | | 06/15/2048 | | | | 5,914,249 | |
750,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Vista Entrada School of Performing Arts & Technology)1 | | | 6.300 | | | | 07/15/2032 | | | | 799,537 | |
1,640,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Vista Entrada School of Performing Arts & Technology)1 | | | 6.550 | | | | 07/15/2042 | | | | 1,745,665 | |
800,000 | | Utah County, UT Charter School (Renaissance Academy)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 07/15/2037 | | | | 800,016 | |
415,000 | | Utah County, UT Charter School (Ronald Wilson Reagan Academy)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2036 | | | | 419,648 | |
855,000 | | Utah County, UT Charter School (Ronald Wilson Reagan Academy)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2046 | | | | 853,726 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 28,043,393 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vermont—0.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
960,000 | | East Central, VT Telecommunications District | | | 5.600 | | | | 12/01/2043 | | | | 948,499 | |
1,450,000 | | East Central, VT Telecommunications District | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2036 | | | | 1,508,711 | |
1,650,000 | | VT EDA (Casella Waste Systems)1 | | | 4.625 | 10 | | | 04/01/2036 | | | | 1,654,191 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 4,111,401 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Virginia—0.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,608,000 | | Celebrate, VA North CDA Special Assessment4,5 | | | 6.750 | | | | 03/01/2034 | | | | 964,800 | |
4,562,000 | | Celebrate, VA South CDA Special Assessment4,5 | | | 6.250 | | | | 03/01/2037 | | | | 2,121,330 | |
8,000,000 | | Chesapeake Bay, VA Bridge & Tunnel District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2046 | | | | 8,716,960 | |
1,258,000 | | Lewistown, VA Commerce Center Community Devel. Authority | | | 6.050 | | | | 03/01/2044 | | | | 1,161,474 | |
2,876,000 | | Lewistown, VA Commerce Center Community Devel. Authority1 | | | 6.050 | | | | 03/01/2044 | | | | 2,655,325 | |
1,965,000 | | Lewistown, VA Commerce Center Community Devel. Authority4 | | | 6.050 | | | | 03/01/2054 | | | | 358,612 | |
|
45 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Virginia (Continued) | | | | | | | | | |
$2,900,000 | | New Port, VA CDA4,5 | | | 5.600 | % | | | 09/01/2036 | | | $ | 1,319,500 | |
1,750,000 | | Peninsula, VA Town Center Community Devel. Authority Special Obligation1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2037 | | | | 1,829,362 | |
2,350,000 | | Peninsula, VA Town Center Community Devel. Authority Special Obligation1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2045 | | | | 2,434,435 | |
2,160,000 | | Richmond, VA Redevel. & Hsg. Authority (American Tobacco Apartments)1 | | | 5.550 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 2,181,902 | |
1,690,000 | | VA Small Business Financing Authority (Covanta Holding Corp.)1 | | | 5.000 | 10 | | | 01/01/2048 | | | | 1,723,378 | |
1,515,000 | | VA Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 1,433,766 | |
2,404,674 | | West Point, VA IDA Solid Waste (Chesapeake Corp.)4,5 | | | 6.375 | | | | 03/01/2019 | | | | 48 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 26,900,892 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Washington—1.8% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
750,000 | | Greater Wenatchee, WA Regional Events Center1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2027 | | | | 764,213 | |
200,000 | | Kelso County, WA Hsg. Authority (Chinook & Columbia Apartments)1 | | | 5.600 | | | | 03/01/2028 | | | | 199,998 | |
50,000 | | Kitsap County, WA Consolidated Hsg. Authority (Heritage Apartments)1 | | | 6.100 | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 50,030 | |
3,000,000 | | Port of Seattle, WA Revenue1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2043 | | | | 3,308,310 | |
2,909,358 | | Tacoma, WA Consolidated Local Improvements District No. 65 | | | 5.750 | | | | 04/01/2043 | | | | 2,909,387 | |
1,500,000 | | Tes Properties, WA2 | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2029 | | | | 1,518,206 | |
12,000,000 | | Tes Properties, WA2 | | | 5.625 | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 12,144,240 | |
21,710,000 | | WA EDFA (Columbia Pulp I) | | | 7.500 | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 24,344,074 | |
2,425,000 | | WA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2030 | | | | 2,884,901 | |
12,640,000 | | WA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2040 | | | | 14,400,752 | |
18,075,000 | | WA Health Care Facilities Authority (Catholic Health Initiatives)2 | | | 6.375 | | | | 10/01/2036 | | | | 18,180,180 | |
17,410,000 | | WA Health Care Facilities Authority (Peacehealth)2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2028 | | | | 17,810,865 | |
1,000,000 | | WA Hsg. Finance Commission (Heron’s Key) | | | 7.000 | | | | 07/01/2045 | | | | 1,064,490 | |
1,700,000 | | WA Hsg. Finance Commission (Heron’s Key) | | | 7.000 | | | | 07/01/2050 | | | | 1,804,975 | |
500,000 | | WA Kalispel Tribe Indians Priority District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 539,085 | |
2,250,000 | | WA Kalispel Tribe Indians Priority District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 2,425,883 | |
3,000,000 | | WA Kalispel Tribe Indians Priority District1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 3,202,080 | |
1,000,000 | | WA Kalispel Tribe Indians Priority District1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 1,067,360 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 108,619,029 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
West Virginia—0.6% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3,000,000 | | Brooke County, WV (Bethany College)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 3,011,010 | |
4,500,000 | | Brooke County, WV (Bethany College)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 10/01/2037 | | | | 4,512,825 | |
27,145,000 | | Harrison County, WV Tax Increment (Charles Pointe)4 | | | 7.000 | | | | 06/01/2035 | | | | 13,572,500 | |
3,435,000 | | Monongalia County, WV Special District Excise Tax (University Town Center) | | | 5.750 | | | | 06/01/2043 | | | | 3,528,364 | |
|
46 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
West Virginia (Continued) | | | | | | | | | |
$10,465,000 | | Ohio County, WV Devel. Authority (Ohio County Sports Complex) | | | 5.000 | % | | | 09/01/2048 | | | $ | 10,258,630 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 34,883,329 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wisconsin—3.2% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3,000,000 | | WI H&EFA (AE Nursing Centers)4 | | | 7.250 | | | | 06/01/2038 | | | | 1,500,000 | |
750,000 | | WI H&EFA (Beloit College)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 06/01/2035 | | | | 792,773 | |
2,015,000 | | WI H&EFA (Beloit College)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 06/01/2039 | | | | 2,129,915 | |
63,000,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (American Dream at Meadowlands Project) | | | 6.750 | | | | 08/01/2031 | | | | 68,441,940 | |
33,850,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (American Dream at Meadowlands Project) | | | 7.000 | | | | 12/01/2050 | | | | 38,038,599 | |
2,075,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Bancroft Neurohealth/Bancroft Rehabilitation Services Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/01/2048 | | | | 2,076,722 | |
7,900,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority(CHF-Wilmington- University of North Carolina)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2058 | | | | 8,418,319 | |
1,821,047 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 5.360 | 6 | | | 01/01/2067 | | | | 47,675 | |
151,210 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 5.449 | 6 | | | 01/01/2066 | | | | 3,981 | |
7,358,195 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel)9 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2056 | | | | 6,894,555 | |
140,331 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 5.542 | 6 | | | 01/01/2065 | | | | 3,716 | |
142,507 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 5.638 | 6 | | | 01/01/2064 | | | | 3,795 | |
145,770 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 5.738 | 6 | | | 01/01/2063 | | | | 3,904 | |
149,034 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 5.841 | 6 | | | 01/01/2062 | | | | 4,015 | |
153,385 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 5.948 | 6 | | | 01/01/2061 | | | | 4,157 | |
155,561 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.059 | 6 | | | 01/01/2060 | | | | 4,241 | |
158,824 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.175 | 6 | | | 01/01/2059 | | | | 4,357 | |
163,176 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.294 | 6 | | | 01/01/2058 | | | | 4,504 | |
167,527 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.418 | 6 | | | 01/01/2057 | | | | 4,652 | |
151,210 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.548 | 6 | | | 01/01/2056 | | | | 4,226 | |
154,473 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.682 | 6 | | | 01/01/2055 | | | | 4,345 | |
157,737 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.823 | 6 | | | 01/01/2054 | | | | 4,467 | |
163,176 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.969 | 6 | | | 01/01/2053 | | | | 4,652 | |
|
47 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Wisconsin (Continued) | | | | | | | | | |
$165,352 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 7.122 | %6 | | | 01/01/2052 | | | $ | 4,746 | |
127,277 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 7.282 | 6 | | | 01/01/2051 | | | | 3,680 | |
129,453 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 7.449 | 6 | | | 01/01/2050 | | | | 3,768 | |
133,804 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 7.624 | 6 | | | 01/01/2049 | | | | 3,924 | |
135,980 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 7.807 | 6 | | | 01/01/2048 | | | | 4,018 | |
155,561 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 8.000 | 6 | | | 01/01/2047 | | | | 4,634 | |
865,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (DHSEP/NMA/CAA/ HCA/HAA/HA/LV/MwA/WA/WHA Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2052 | | | | 841,559 | |
5,200,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (FNC&M / FBA / FCP / FFC / FGC / FJeffC / FJC / FMN / FTS / FP1 / FP2 / FRB Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2045 | | | | 5,244,512 | |
3,800,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (FNC&M / FBA / FCP / FFC / FGC / FJeffC / FJC / FMN / FTS / FP1 / FP2 / FRB Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.150 | | | | 12/01/2050 | | | | 3,843,282 | |
6,790,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (FNC&M / FBA / FCP / FFC / FGC / FJeffC / FJC / FMN / FTS / FP1 / FP2 / FRB Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.350 | | | | 12/01/2052 | | | | 6,925,461 | |
1,055,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Las Ventanas Retirement Community) | | | 0.210 | 6 | | | 10/01/2042 | | | | 507,233 | |
6,657,500 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Las Ventanas Retirement Community) | | | 7.000 | | | | 10/01/2042 | | | | 6,454,979 | |
2,000,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Las Ventanas Retirement Community)5 | | | 36.095 | 6 | | | 10/01/2042 | | | | 41,200 | |
660,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Thomas Jefferson Classical Academy)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 664,712 | |
7,720,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (University of Kansas)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2046 | | | | 8,409,705 | |
7,000,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority Charter School (Denver International Airport Great Hall)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/30/2049 | | | | 7,539,350 | |
2,500,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority Charter School (Envision Science Academy) | | | 5.250 | | | | 05/01/2046 | | | | 2,299,850 | |
1,175,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority Charter School (Explore Knowledge Foundation)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/15/2032 | | | | 1,234,008 | |
1,345,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority Charter School (Explore Knowledge Foundation)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/15/2042 | | | | 1,403,924 | |
1,910,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority Educational Facility (Ask Academy)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 02/01/2045 | | | | 1,818,454 | |
5,875,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority Educational Facility (Horizon Academy West Charter School)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 09/01/2045 | | | | 5,919,650 | |
|
48 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Wisconsin (Continued) | | | | | | | | | |
$10,960,000 | | WI Public Financing Authority Multifamily Hsg. (Trinity-Eagle’s Point)1 | | | 5.250 | % | | | 01/01/2052 | | | $ | 11,331,873 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 192,904,032 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Possessions—12.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
25,745,000 | | Northern Mariana Islands Commonwealth, Series B | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2033 | | | | 23,250,052 | |
10,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority, AGC | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2025 | | | | 10,346 | |
11,980,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 10,931,750 | |
250,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 232,500 | |
25,035,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 23,282,550 | |
3,325,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 3,175,375 | |
7,645,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2044 | | | | 7,300,975 | |
30,945,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 29,397,750 | |
10,790,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 05/15/2033 | | | | 10,910,632 | |
33,540,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/15/2039 | | | | 33,914,977 | |
91,100,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 05/15/2043 | | | | 92,118,498 | |
28,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC) | | | 6.749 | 6 | | | 05/15/2050 | | | | 3,718,400 | |
152,450,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC) | | | 9.352 | 6 | | | 05/15/2055 | | | | 8,374,078 | |
285,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO, AGC11 | | | 3.542 | | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 285,712 | |
1,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 849,375 | |
2,550,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 1,179,375 | |
10,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO, AGC1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2034 | | | | 10,225 | |
1,660,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2034 | | | | 939,975 | |
6,765,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 3,128,812 | |
450,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.125 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 253,687 | |
2,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.125 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 930,000 | |
5,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO, AGC | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 5,296 | |
1,920,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 1,087,200 | |
2,165,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,225,931 | |
40,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2018 | | | | 22,450 | |
3,255,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 1,513,575 | |
14,695,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 6,833,175 | |
340,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 158,100 | |
11,540,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 6,505,675 | |
1,345,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO, AGC | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,387,758 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 1,691,250 | |
65,250,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 35,316,562 | |
2,625,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,499,531 | |
9,265,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 5,292,631 | |
12,250,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 7,028,437 | |
14,550,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 8,348,062 | |
13,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2040 | | | | 7,458,750 | |
1,545,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 8.000 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 714,562 | |
1,501,705 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 970,477 | |
1,501,705 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 970,477 | |
1,629,052 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | 01/01/2021 | | | | 1,052,775 | |
1,629,051 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 1,052,774 | |
|
49 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
U.S. Possessions (Continued) | | | | | | | | | |
$543,017 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | % | | | 01/01/2022 | | | $ | 350,925 | |
543,018 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 350,925 | |
3,100,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2029 | | | | 1,933,625 | |
11,925,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A4 | | | 5.050 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 7,438,219 | |
480,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A4 | | | 7.000 | | | | 07/01/2040 | | | | 304,200 | |
9,080,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A4 | | | 7.000 | | | | 07/01/2043 | | | | 5,754,450 | |
160,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A4 | | | 7.250 | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 101,400 | |
40,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 25,050 | |
40,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 25,050 | |
10,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 6,263 | |
4,570,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 2,861,963 | |
2,600,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 1,628,250 | |
445,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2029 | | | | 278,681 | |
95,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 59,494 | |
310,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 193,363 | |
35,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 21,831 | |
20,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2025 | | | | 12,475 | |
285,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 177,769 | |
540,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 336,825 | |
2,570,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 1,609,463 | |
185,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series DDD4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 115,394 | |
15,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series NN4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 9,431 | |
170,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2017 | | | | 105,612 | |
20,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2018 | | | | 12,425 | |
5,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 3,119 | |
55,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 34,306 | |
210,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 130,988 | |
280,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 174,650 | |
15,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 9,356 | |
895,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 558,256 | |
1,990,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 1,241,263 | |
3,680,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2032 | | | | 2,295,400 | |
390,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series UU4 | | | 2.150 | 10 | | | 07/01/2017 | | | | 227,663 | |
7,905,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series UU, AGC | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 8,171,478 | |
22,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series VV, NPFGC | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 23,428,460 | |
685,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 427,269 | |
415,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 259,894 | |
85,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW4 | | | 5.375 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 53,231 | |
390,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW4 | | | 5.375 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 244,238 | |
60,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 37,725 | |
605,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 380,394 | |
10,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series XX4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 6,263 | |
845,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series XX4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 529,181 | |
2,660,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series XX4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,665,825 | |
28,430,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series XX4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2040 | | | | 17,804,288 | |
18,575,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series XX4 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 11,679,031 | |
|
50 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
U.S. Possessions (Continued) | | | | | | | | | |
$190,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ4 | | | 4.625 | % | | | 07/01/2025 | | | $ | 117,658 | |
820,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2017 | | | | 509,425 | |
95,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 59,256 | |
850,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 530,188 | |
215,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 134,106 | |
10,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 6,238 | |
25,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 15,656 | |
50,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 31,313 | |
275,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2025 | | | | 172,219 | |
1,135,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 710,794 | |
215,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, AGC1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 222,342 | |
45,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, AGC1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 46,439 | |
2,175,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 293,625 | |
1,360,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 918,000 | |
250,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, NPFGC1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2029 | | | | 250,197 | |
1,035,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 698,625 | |
7,895,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority4 | | | 5.300 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 5,329,125 | |
25,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, AGC1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 27,066 | |
5,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2029 | | | | 3,375,000 | |
3,250,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 2,193,750 | |
50,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, AGC1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 50,439 | |
350,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, FGIC12 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 271,250 | |
9,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, AGC1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 9,409,590 | |
605,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series H4 | | | 5.450 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 179,987 | |
4,715,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series M4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2046 | | | | 1,402,712 | |
5,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 750,000 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 450,000 | |
7,300,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure (Mepsi Campus)4 | | | 6.500 | | | | 10/01/2037 | | | | 1,478,250 | |
25,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, AGC1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 25,370 | |
5,500,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Cogeneration Facilities) | | | 6.625 | | | | 06/01/2026 | | | | 5,369,375 | |
4,050,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Hospital Auxilio Mutuo)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 4,207,626 | |
300,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (University of the Sacred Heart) | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2020 | | | | 290,250 | |
100,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (University of the Sacred Heart) | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2021 | | | | 96,500 | |
25,000 | | Puerto Rico Municipal Finance Agency, Series B, AGC1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 25,248 | |
3,870,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2032 | | | | 2,409,075 | |
150,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 93,375 | |
|
51 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | �� | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
U.S. Possessions (Continued) | | | | | | | | | |
$100,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.250 | % | | | 07/01/2023 | | | $ | 50,250 | |
73,395,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 36,880,987 | |
260,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 146,250 | |
200,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 124,500 | |
5,860,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.625 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 3,647,850 | |
12,845,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 7,225,312 | |
7,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.875 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 3,937,500 | |
8,825,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 4,964,062 | |
12,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 6.125 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 7,500,000 | |
5,100,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 3,187,500 | |
4,980,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 6.750 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 3,112,500 | |
1,515,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Series D4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 943,087 | |
49,020,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., Series B4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2031 | | | | 2,696,100 | |
9,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp.4 | | | 6.900 | 3 | | | 08/01/2026 | | | | 4,583,750 | |
220,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. (Build America Bonds)4 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/01/2042 | | | | 105,600 | |
42,745,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 08/01/2033 | | | | 17,743,877 | |
1,590,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2019 | | | | 779,100 | |
1,630,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2024 | | | | 798,700 | |
15,735,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2043 | | | | 7,710,150 | |
11,885,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 08/01/2027 | | | | 5,823,650 | |
41,045,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 5.375 | | | | 08/01/2039 | | | | 20,112,050 | |
700,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2023 | | | | 343,000 | |
4,145,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2028 | | | | 2,031,050 | |
41,650,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/01/2037 | | | | 20,408,500 | |
44,365,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A, NPFGC | | | 5.826 | 6 | | | 08/01/2043 | | | | 11,171,994 | |
46,950,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A, NPFGC | | | 5.829 | 6 | | | 08/01/2042 | | | | 12,507,480 | |
17,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A, NPFGC | | | 5.830 | 6 | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 4,931,675 | |
7,945,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 7.886 | 6 | | | 08/01/2034 | | | | 1,138,757 | |
37,060,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 8.691 | 6 | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 5,279,568 | |
30,980,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., SeriesA-14 | | | 5.250 | | | | 08/01/2043 | | | | 15,180,200 | |
330,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C4 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2026 | | | | 273,075 | |
300,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 147,000 | |
135,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2046 | | | | 111,713 | |
54,720,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 26,812,800 | |
3,670,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C4 | | | 5.375 | | | | 08/01/2036 | | | | 1,798,300 | |
5,290,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C4 | | | 5.375 | | | | 08/01/2038 | | | | 2,592,100 | |
19,555,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C4 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/01/2057 | | | | 16,181,763 | |
50,000 | | University of Puerto Rico, Series P | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2021 | | | | 48,750 | |
100,000 | | University of Puerto Rico, Series P | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2022 | | | | 97,000 | |
5,000,000 | | University of Puerto Rico, Series P | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2030 | | | | 4,650,000 | |
|
52 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
U.S. Possessions (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,025,000 | | University of Puerto Rico, Series Q | | | 5.000 | % | | | 06/01/2036 | | | $ | 922,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 738,255,922 | |
Total Municipal Bonds and Notes (Cost $7,509,572,886) | | | | | | | | | | | 7,038,251,204 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate Bonds and Notes—0.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2,890,000 | | TX German Pellets Series Secured Note Series 20161,5,13,14 | | | 8.000 | | | | 03/29/2019 | | | | 2,312,000 | |
3,030,000 | | TX German Pellets Series Secured Note Series 20161,5,13,14 | | | 8.000 | | | | 03/29/2019 | | | | 2,424,000 | |
Total Corporate Bonds and Notes (Cost $5,920,000) | | | | | | | | | | | 4,736,000 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate Loans—0.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
7,000,000 | | Aspen Power Senior Secured Bridge Promissory Note4,5,14 | | | 9.000 | 10 | | | 11/15/2019 | | | | 520,727 | |
3,500,000 | | Aspen Power Senior Secured Bridge Promissory Note4,5,14 | | | 9.000 | 10 | | | 11/15/2019 | | | | 260,364 | |
6,000,000 | | Aspen Power Senior Secured Bridge Promissory Note4,5,14 | | | 9.000 | 10 | | | 11/15/2019 | | | | 446,338 | |
2,750,000 | | Aspen Power Senior Secured Bridge Promissory Note4,5,14 | | | 9.000 | 10 | | | 11/15/2019 | | | | 204,571 | |
1,350,000 | | Central Falls, RI Detention Facility Promissory Note5,14 | | | 11.250 | 10 | | | 2/22/2019 | | | | 1,350,000 | |
Total Corporate Loans (Cost $20,600,000) | | | | | | | | | | | 2,782,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks—0.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
7,679 | | Delta Air Lines, Inc.14 | | | | | | | | | | | 379,573 | |
2,919 | | General Motors Co.14 | | | | | | | | | | | 113,899 | |
Total Common Stocks (Cost $54,137) | | | | | | | | | | | 493,472 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Investments, at Value (Cost $7,536,147,023)—114.9% | | | | | | | | | | | 7,046,262,676 | |
Net Other Assets (Liabilities)—(14.9) | | | | | | | | | | | (914,657,337 | ) |
Net Assets—100.0% | | | | | | | | | | $ | 6,131,605,339 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Footnotes to Statement of Investments
1. All or a portion of the security position has been segregated for collateral to cover borrowings. See Note 9 of the accompanying Notes.
2. Security represents the underlying municipal bond with respect to an inverse floating rate security held by the
Fund. The bond was purchased by the Fund and subsequently transferred to a trust, which issued the related inverse floating rate security. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
3. Denotes a step bond: a zero coupon bond that converts to a fixed or variable interest rate at a designated future date.
4. This security is not accruing income because its issuer has missed or is expected to miss interest and/or principal payments. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
5. The value of this security was determined using significant unobservable inputs. See Note 3 of the accompanying
Notes.
6. Zero coupon bond reflects effective yield on the original acquisition date.
|
53 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
Footnotes to Statement of Investments (Continued)
7. All or a portion of the security position is when-issued or delayed delivery to be delivered and settled after period end. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
8. This security is accruing partial income at an anticipated effective rate based on expected interest and/or principal payments. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate.
9. Interest or dividend ispaid-in-kind, when applicable.
10. This interest rate resets periodically. Interest rate shown reflects the rate in effect at period end. The rate on this variable rate security is not based on a published reference rate and spread but is determined by the issuer or agent based on current market conditions.
11. Denotes an inflation-indexed security: coupon or principal are indexed to a consumer price index.
12. The issuer of this security has missed or is expected to miss interest and/or principal payments on this security. The security is insured and is accruing partial income at a rate anticipated to be recovered through the insurer. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate.
13. Restricted security. The aggregate value of restricted securities at period end was $4,736,000, which represents 0.08% of the Fund’s net assets. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes. Information concerning restricted securities is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Acquisition Dates | | | Cost | | | Value | | | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |
TX German Pellets Series Secured Note | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Series 2016, 8.00%, 3/29/19 | | | 6/15/16 | | | $ | 2,890,000 | | | $ | 2,312,000 | | | $ | (578,000) | |
TX German Pellets Series Secured Note | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Series 2016, 8.00%, 3/29/19 | | | 4/24/17 | | | | 3,030,000 | | | | 2,424,000 | | | | (606,000) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 5,920,000 | | | $ | 4,736,000 | | | $ | (1,184,000) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
14. Received as a result of a corporate action.
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below:
| | |
AAD | | AHFO-Arbors at Denton |
AAHI | | AHFO-Arbors at Huntsville I |
AAHII | | AHFO-Arbors at Huntsville II |
ACMC | | Advocate Condell Medical Center |
AE | | American Eagle |
AGC | | Assured Guaranty Corp. |
AH&HC | | Advocate Health & Hospitals Corp. |
AHCN | | Advocate Health Care Metro |
AHFO | | Atlantic Hsg. Foundation |
AHFP | | American Housing Foundation Properties |
ANSHN | | Advocate North Side Health Network |
APH | | AHFO-Palm House |
ASU | | Arizona State University |
AW | | AHFO-Westfield |
AWHC | | AHFO-Windover Health Club |
BethH | | Bethesda Hospital |
BHI | | Baptist Homes of Indiana |
BHlth | | Bethesda Health |
BHM | | Baptist Hospital of Miami |
BHSF | | Baptist Health South Florida |
BOS | | Baptist Outpatient Services |
BVHF | | Blanchard Valley Health Foundation |
BVRHC | | Blanchard Valley Regional Health Care |
|
54 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below: (Continued)
| | |
CAA | | Cooks Avenue Affordable |
CCHCS | | Cook Children’s Health Care System |
CCMCtr | | Cook Children’s Medical Center |
CCPN | | Cook Children’s Physical Network |
CDA | | Communities Devel. Authority |
CDHA | | Central Dupage Hospital Association |
CDHS | | Central Dupage Health System |
CHCC | | Community Hospitals of Central California |
CHF | | City Hospital Foundation |
CHSTX | | Children’s Health System of Texas |
CMCD | | Children’s Medical Center of Dallas |
CMCtrF | | Children’s Medical Center Foundation |
COHF | | Collegiate Housing Foundation |
COHS | | Community Health Service |
COP | | Certificates of Participation |
CVHC | | Conneaut Valley Health Center |
DA | | Dormitory Authority |
DHSEP | | Dogwoood Housing Southeast Portfolio |
DrsH | | Doctors Hospital |
EDA | | Economic Devel. Authority |
EDC | | Economic Devel. Corp. |
EDFA | | Economic Devel. Finance Authority |
EF&CD | | Environmental Facilities and Community Devel. |
EFC | | Environmental Facilities Corp. |
ELGS | | Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan |
ELGSF | | Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Foundation |
ELGSS | | Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society |
FBA | | FFAH Beaumont Avenue |
FCHMC | | Fresno Community Hospital & Medical Center |
FCIM | | French Creek Internal Medicine |
FCommH | | Fayette Community Hospital |
FCP | | FFAH Coleridge Road |
FFC | | FFAH Franklin Court |
FGC | | FFAH Glendale Court |
FGIC | | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. |
FHlth | | Fishermen’s Health |
FJC | | FFAH Johnson Court |
FJeffC | | FFAH Jefferson Court |
FMN | | FFAH Market North |
FNC&M | | FFAH North Carolina and Missouri |
FP1 | | FFAH Plaza 1 |
FP2 | | FFAH Plaza 2 |
FRB | | FFAH Riverview Bend |
FTS | | FFAH Tucker Street |
GO | | General Obligation |
GSSH | | Georgia Southwestern University |
H&EFA | | Health and Educational Facilities Authority |
H&HEFA | | Hospitals and Higher Education Facilities Authority |
HA | | Heatherwood Affordable |
HAA | | Hidden Acres Affordable |
|
55 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below: (Continued)
| | |
HCA | | Hickory Creek Affordable |
HCCO | | Homecare Connections |
HCrawC | | Hospice of Crawford County |
HDA | | Hospital Devel. Authority |
HDC | | Housing Devel. Corp. |
HE&HFB | | Higher Educational and Housing Facility Board |
HEFA | | Higher Education Facilities Authority |
HEHA | | Higher Education and Health Authority |
HFA | | Housing Finance Agency |
HFC | | Housing Finance Corp. |
HFDC | | Health Facilities Devel. Corp. |
HFHS | | Henry Ford Health System |
HFMHCT | | Henry Ford Macomb Hospital Corp.-Clinton Township |
HFWH | | Henry Ford Wyandotte Hospital |
HHI | | Homestead Hospital |
HHlthS | | Holzer Health Systems |
HMCG | | Holzer Medical Center-Gallipolis |
HMCJ | | Holzer Medical Center-Jackson |
IDA | | Industrial Devel. Agency |
ITEMECF | | Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Community Facilities |
JFK | | John Fitzgerald Kennedy |
KGC | | Kuakini Geriatric Care |
KHS | | Kaukini Health System |
KMC | | Kuakini Medical Center |
KSS | | Kuakini Support Services |
L.I. | | Long Island |
LCMAS | | Little Company of Mary Ancillary Services Corp. |
LV | | Lakeview Affordable |
M-WHOUPMC | | Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC |
MarH | | Mariners Hospital |
MMedC | | Meadville Medical Center |
MMedCF | | Meadville Medical Center Foundation |
MPS | | Meadville Physician Services |
MRC | | Methodist Retirement Communities |
MTA | | Metropolitan Transportation Authority |
MwA | | Mary Washington Hospital |
NCCD | | National Campus and Community Development |
NMA | | New Main Affordable |
NPFGC | | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
NTE | | North Texas Express |
NY/NJ | | New York/New Jersey |
NYC | | New York City |
NYS | | New York State |
OU | | Oklahoma University |
PacMedC | | PacMed Clinic |
PAS | | Presence Ambulatory Services |
PBH | | Presence Behavioral Health |
PC&SHN | | Presence Central & Suburban Hospitals Network |
PCHN | | Presence Chicago Hospitals Network |
PClinic | | Piedmont Clinic |
|
56 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below: (Continued)
| | |
PCTC | | Presence Care Transformation Corp. |
PH&S | | Providence Health & Services |
PH&SO | | Providence Health & Services-Oregon |
PH&SW | | Providence Health & Services-Washington |
PHC | | Piedmont Healthcare |
PHCr | | Presence Home Care |
PHFBT | | Presence Health Food Foundation Board of Trustees |
PHHosp | | Piedmont Henry Hospital |
PHI | | Piedmont Heart Institute |
PHIP | | Piedmont Heart Institute Physicians |
PHlthCF | | Piedmont Healthcare Foundation |
PHN | | Presence Health Network |
PHosp | | Piedmont Hospital |
PHS | | Pinnacle Health System |
PH&SWW | | Providence Health & Services - Western Washington |
PHSSC | | Providence Health System-Southern CA |
PLC | | Presence Life Connections |
PMCC | | Piedmont Medical Care Corp. |
PMSH | | Piedmont Mountainside Hospital |
PNH | | Piedmont Newnan Hospital |
PSJH | | Providence St. Joseph Health |
PSJHCtr | | Providence St. John’s Health Center |
PSJMC | | Providence St. Joseph Medical Center |
PSSC | | Presence Senior Services - Chicagoland |
RBM | | Rocketship Brilliant Minds |
RDP | | Rocketship Discovery Prep |
RE | | Rocketship Education |
Res Rec | | Resource Recovery Facility |
REW | | Rocketship Education Wisconsin |
RLSA | | Rocketship Los Suenos Academy |
RMS | | Rocketship Mateo Sheedy |
RNNE | | Rocketship Nashville Northeast Elementary |
RRCP | | Rocketship Redwood City Prep |
RSA | | Rocketship Spark Academy |
RSCP | | Rocketship Southside Community Prep |
RSSPA | | Rocketship Si Se Puede Academy |
SE | | Swedish Edmonds |
SHlthS | | Swedish Health Services |
SJHCN | | St. Joseph Home Care Network |
SJHE | | St. Joseph Hospital of Eureka |
SJHO | | St. Joseph Hospital of Orange |
SJHS | | St. Joseph Health System |
SL2016 | | Senior Living 2016 |
SLC | | Senior Living Chesteron |
SLF | | Senior Living Fairfield |
SLFW | | Senior Living Fort Wayne |
SLW | | Senior Living Waterville |
SMH | | South Miami Hospital |
TAH | | Titusville Area Hospital |
TAHC | | Titusville Area Health Center |
|
57 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited / Continued
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below: (Continued)
| | |
TAHCF | | Titusville Area Health Foundation |
TAHS | | Titusville Area Health Service |
TASC | | Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds |
TFA | | Transportation Finance Authority |
UDC | | Urban Development Corporation |
UMEP | | UME Preparatory Academy |
UPMC | | University of Pittsburgh Medical Center |
UPMC-P | | UPMC Passavant |
UPMC-PS | | UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside |
UPMC-SM | | UPMC St Margaret |
VOA | | Volunteers of America |
WA | | Westlake Affordable |
WAFMH | | W A Foote Memorial Hospital |
WHA | | Weeden Heights Affordable |
WICF | | W.I. Cook Foundation |
WKBP | | West Kendall Baptist Hospital |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
58 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIESJanuary 31, 2019 Unaudited
| | | | |
Assets | | | | |
Investments, at value (cost $7,536,147,023)—see accompanying statement of investments | | $ | 7,046,262,676 | |
|
| |
Cash | | | 814,354 | |
|
| |
Receivables and other assets: | | | | |
Interest | | | 71,178,345 | |
Investments sold on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis | | | 29,551,590 | |
Shares of beneficial interest sold | | | 8,681,612 | |
Other | | | 1,133,518 | |
| | | | |
Total assets | | | 7,157,622,095 | |
Liabilities | | | | |
Payables and other liabilities: | | | | |
Payable for short-term floating rate notes issued (See Note 4) | | | 896,885,000 | |
Payable for borrowings (See Note 9) | | | 59,900,000 | |
Investments purchased (including $53,122,350 purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis) | | | 53,127,402 | |
Dividends | | | 7,508,678 | |
Shares of beneficial interest redeemed | | | 6,765,426 | |
Distribution and service plan fees | | | 811,076 | |
Trustees’ compensation | | | 566,821 | |
Interest expense on borrowings | | | 139,293 | |
Shareholder communications | | | 20,881 | |
Other | | | 292,179 | |
| | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 1,026,016,756 | |
Net Assets | | $ | 6,131,605,339 | |
| | | | |
|
| |
Composition of Net Assets | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | $ | 7,985,616,949 | |
|
| |
Total accumulated loss | | | (1,854,011,610) | |
| | | | |
Net Assets | | $ | 6,131,605,339 | |
| | | | |
|
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share | | | | |
| |
Class A Shares: | | | | |
| |
Net asset value and redemption price per share (based on net assets of $3,116,404,949 and 428,387,107 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | | $7.27 | |
| |
Maximum offering price per share (net asset value plus sales charge of 4.75% of offering price) | | | $7.63 | |
|
| |
| |
Class C Shares: | | | | |
| |
Net asset value, redemption price (excludes applicable contingent deferred sales charge) and offering price per share (based on net assets of $1,201,833,356 and 165,945,890 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | | $7.24 | |
|
| |
| |
Class Y Shares: | | | | |
| |
Net asset value, redemption price and offering price per share (based on net assets of $1,813,367,034 and 249,551,266 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | | $7.27 | |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
59 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONSFor the Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 Unaudited
| | | | |
Investment Income | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 164,827,071 | |
Dividends | | | 4,906 | |
| | | | |
Total investment income | | | 164,831,977 | |
| | | | |
Expenses | | | | |
Management fees | | | 11,484,631 | |
Distribution and service plan fees: | | | | |
Class A | | | 3,892,779 | |
Class C | | | 5,539,344 | |
Transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees: | | | | |
Class A | | | 1,573,479 | |
Class C | | | 615,590 | |
Class Y | | | 894,211 | |
Shareholder communications: | | | | |
Class A | | | 19,393 | |
Class C | | | 11,460 | |
Class Y | | | 10,502 | |
Interest expense and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued (See Note 4) | | | 10,877,325 | |
Borrowing fees | | | 3,719,128 | |
Interest expense on borrowings | | | 1,082,502 | |
Custodian fees and expenses | | | 70,790 | |
Trustees’ compensation | | | 44,580 | |
Other | | | 1,673,744 | |
| | | | |
Total expenses | | | 41,509,458 | |
Net Investment Income | | | 123,322,519 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | | |
Net realized loss on investment transactions | | | (149,568,734) | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investment transactions | | | 109,834,440 | |
| |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | | $ | 83,588,225 | |
| | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
60 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 | | | Year Ended | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | July 31, 20181 | |
| |
Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 123,322,519 | | | $ | 276,050,998 | |
| |
Net realized loss | | | (149,568,734) | | | | (137,548,911) | |
| |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | 109,834,440 | | | | 210,391,735 | |
| | | | |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | | | 83,588,225 | | | | 348,893,822 | |
|
| |
Dividends and/or Distributions to Shareholders | | | | | | | | |
Dividends and distributions declared: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (72,118,338) | | | | (159,145,298) | |
Class B2 | | | — | | | | (329,684) | |
Class C | | | (24,311,181) | | | | (56,369,148) | |
Class Y | | | (43,344,469) | | | | (74,938,103) | |
| | | | |
Total dividends and distributions declared | | | (139,773,988) | | | | (290,782,233) | |
|
| |
Beneficial Interest Transactions | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from beneficial interest transactions: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (21,244,245) | | | | (46,720,186) | |
Class B2 | | | — | | | | (14,915,107) | |
Class C | | | (18,270,561) | | | | (79,703,206) | |
Class Y | | | 6,590,873 | | | | 470,600,102 | |
| | | | |
Total beneficial interest transactions | | | (32,923,933) | | | | 329,261,603 | |
|
| |
Net Assets | | | | | | | | |
Total increase (decrease) | | | (89,109,696) | | | | 387,373,192 | |
Beginning of period | | | 6,220,715,035 | | | | 5,833,341,843 | |
| | | | |
End of period | | $ | 6,131,605,339 | | | $ | 6,220,715,035 | |
| | | | |
1. Prior period amounts have been conformed to current year presentation. See Notes to Financial Statements, Notes2-New Accounting Pronouncements for further details.
2. Effective June 1, 2018, all Class B shares converted to Class A shares.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
61 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF
CASH FLOWSFor the Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 Unaudited
| | | | |
|
| |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 83,588,225 | |
| |
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | |
Purchase of investment securities | | | (1,865,277,989) | |
Proceeds from disposition of investment securities | | | 1,796,248,546 | |
Short-term investment securities, net | | | 66,095,225 | |
Premium amortization | | | 20,034,698 | |
Discount accretion | | | (31,674,807) | |
Net realized loss on investment transactions | | | 149,568,734 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investment transactions | | | (109,834,440) | |
Change in assets: | | | | |
Decrease in other assets | | | 1,230,924 | |
Increase in interest receivable | | | (2,518,145) | |
Decrease in receivable for securities sold | | | 62,828,657 | |
Change in liabilities: | | | | |
Decrease in other liabilities | | | (83,779) | |
Decrease in payable for securities purchased | | | (138,011,392) | |
| | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 32,194,457 | |
|
| |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | | | | |
Proceeds from borrowings | | | 1,028,500,000 | |
Payments on borrowings | | | (1,101,500,000) | |
Payments/proceeds on short-term floating rate notes issued | | | 212,960,000 | |
Proceeds from shares sold | | | 925,591,914 | |
Payments on shares redeemed | | | (1,078,115,362) | |
Cash distributions paid | | | (19,251,151) | |
| | | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (31,814,599) | |
| |
Net increase in cash | | | 379,858 | |
| |
Cash, beginning balance | | | 434,496 | |
| | | | |
Cash, ending balance | | $ | 814,354 | |
| | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of reinvestment of dividends and distributions of $118,041,411.
Cash paid for interest on borrowings—$1,025,563.
Cash paid for interest on short-term floating rate notes issued—$10,877,325.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
62 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 (Unaudited) | | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 | |
| |
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $7.34 | | | | $7.27 | | | | $7.37 | | | | $6.86 | | | | $7.01 | | | | $6.87 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.15 | | | | 0.36 | | | | 0.39 | | | | 0.46 | | | | 0.51 | | | | 0.50 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.05) | | | | 0.08 | | | | (0.07) | | | | 0.52 | | | | (0.18) | | | | 0.13 | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.10 | | | | 0.44 | | | | 0.32 | | | | 0.98 | | | | 0.33 | | | | 0.63 | |
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.17) | | | | (0.37) | | | | (0.42) | | | | (0.47) | | | | (0.48) | | | | (0.49) | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $7.27 | | | | $7.34 | | | | $7.27 | | | | $7.37 | | | | $6.86 | | | | $7.01 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 1.36% | | | | 6.34% | | | | 4.47% | | | | 14.91% | | | | 4.59% | | | | 9.63% | |
|
| |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $3,116,405 | | | | $3,164,888 | | | | $3,182,443 | | | | $3,245,013 | | | | $2,968,690 | | | | $3,260,438 | |
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $3,120,629 | | | | $3,060,512 | | | | $3,159,138 | | | | $3,064,632 | | | | $3,258,788 | | | | $3,477,994 | |
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.06% | | | | 4.94% | | | | 5.36% | | | | 6.54% | | | | 7.19% | | | | 7.24% | |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 0.78% | | | | 0.81% | | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.74% | | | | 0.74% | | | | 0.71% | |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.16% | | | | 0.15% | | | | 0.13% | | | | 0.09% | | | | 0.08% | | | | 0.09% | |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.35% | | | | 0.08% | | | | 0.18% | | | | 0.17% | | | | 0.17% | | | | 0.25% | |
Total expenses | | | 1.29% | | | | 1.04% | | | | 1.06% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 0.99% | | | | 1.05% | |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 1.29% | | | | 1.04% | | | | 1.06% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 0.99% | | | | 1.05% | 5 |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 26% | | | | 34% | | | | 29% | | | | 20% | | | | 16% | | | | 16% | |
|
63 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTSContinued
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
5. Waiver was less than 0.005%.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
64 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C | | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 (Unaudited) | | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 | |
| |
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $7.31 | | | | $7.24 | | | | $7.35 | | | | $6.83 | | | | $6.99 | | | | $6.85 | |
|
| |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.13 | | | | 0.31 | | | | 0.33 | | | | 0.41 | | | | 0.46 | | | | 0.44 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.06) | | | | 0.09 | | | | (0.07) | | | | 0.53 | | | | (0.20) | | | | 0.14 | |
| | | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.07 | | | | 0.40 | | | | 0.26 | | | | 0.94 | | | | 0.26 | | | | 0.58 | |
|
| |
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.14) | | | | (0.33) | | | | (0.37) | | | | (0.42) | | | | (0.42) | | | | (0.44) | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $7.24 | | | | $7.31 | | | | $7.24 | | | | $7.35 | | | | $6.83 | | | | $6.99 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 1.04% | | | | 5.68% | | | | 3.74% | | | | 14.13% | | | | 3.68% | | | | 8.84% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $1,201,833 | | | | $1,231,057 | | | | $1,301,304 | | | | $1,375,239 | | | | $1,234,906 | | | | $1,311,700 | |
|
| |
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $1,220,874 | | | | $1,231,693 | | | | $1,327,082 | | | | $1,289,508 | | | | $1,344,166 | | | | $1,337,849 | |
|
| |
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.41% | | | | 4.29% | | | | 4.66% | | | | 5.80% | | | | 6.43% | | | | 6.49% | |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 1.43% | | | | 1.46% | | | | 1.47% | | | | 1.49% | | | | 1.50% | | | | 1.47% | |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.16% | | | | 0.15% | | | | 0.13% | | | | 0.09% | | | | 0.08% | | | | 0.09% | |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.35% | | | | 0.08% | | | | 0.18% | | | | 0.17% | | | | 0.17% | | | | 0.25% | |
| | | | |
Total expenses | | | 1.94% | | | | 1.69% | | | | 1.78% | | | | 1.75% | | | | 1.75% | | | | 1.81% | |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 1.94% | | | | 1.69% | | | | 1.78% | | | | 1.75% | | | | 1.75% | | | | 1.81%5 | |
|
| |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 26% | | | | 34% | | | | 29% | | | | 20% | | | | 16% | | | | 16% | |
|
65 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTSContinued
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
5. Waiver was less than 0.005%.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
66 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class Y | | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 (Unaudited) | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 |
|
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $7.33 | | $7.26 | | $7.37 | | $6.85 | | $7.00 | | $6.86 |
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | 0.16 | | 0.38 | | 0.39 | | 0.47 | | 0.52 | | 0.50 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | (0.04) | | 0.08 | | (0.06) | | 0.53 | | (0.18) | | 0.14 |
| | |
Total from investment operations | | 0.12 | | 0.46 | | 0.33 | | 1.00 | | 0.34 | | 0.64 |
|
|
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | (0.18) | | (0.39) | | (0.44) | | (0.48) | | (0.49) | | (0.50) |
|
|
Net asset value, end of period | | $7.27 | | $7.33 | | $7.26 | | $7.37 | | $6.85 | | $7.00 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | 1.63% | | 6.61% | | 4.66% | | 15.10% | | 4.61% | | 9.96% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | $1,813,367 | | $1,824,770 | | $1,334,351 | | $920,958 | | $692,717 | | $562,641 |
|
|
Average net assets (in thousands) | | $1,774,428 | | $1,381,976 | | $1,061,569 | | $804,978 | | $700,339 | | $501,364 |
|
|
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | 4.31% | | 5.19% | | 5.40% | | 6.68% | | 7.33% | | 7.36% |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | 0.53% | | 0.56% | | 0.57% | | 0.59% | | 0.59% | | 0.56% |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | 0.16% | | 0.15% | | 0.13% | | 0.09% | | 0.08% | | 0.09% |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | 0.35% | | 0.08% | | 0.18% | | 0.17% | | 0.17% | | 0.25% |
| | |
Total expenses | | 1.04% | | 0.79% | | 0.88% | | 0.85% | | 0.84% | | 0.90% |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | 1.04% | | 0.79% | | 0.88% | | 0.85% | | 0.84% | | 0.90% |
|
|
Portfolio turnover rate | | 26% | | 34% | | 29% | | 20% | | 16% | | 16% |
|
67 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTSContinued
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
68 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSJanuary 31, 2019 Unaudited
1. Organization
Oppenheimer Rochester High-Yield Municipal Fund (the “Fund”) is a separate series of Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust, a diversified,open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”), as amended. The Fund’s investment objective is to seektax-free income. The Fund’s investment adviser is OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (“OFI Global” or the “Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (“OFI” or the“Sub-Adviser”). The Manager has entered into asub-advisory agreement with OFI.
The Fund offers Class A, Class C and Class Y shares, and previously offered Class B shares for new purchase through June 29, 2012. Subsequent to that date, no new purchases of Class B shares were permitted. Reinvestment of dividend and/or capital gain distributions and exchanges of Class B shares into and from other Oppenheimer funds were permitted through May 31, 2018. Effective June 1, 2018 (the “Conversion Date”), all Class B shares converted to Class A shares. Class A shares are sold at their offering price, which is normally net asset value plus afront-end sales charge. Class C shares are sold, and Class B shares were sold, without afront-end sales charge but may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”). Class Y shares are sold to certain institutional investors or intermediaries without either afront-end sales charge or a CDSC, however, the intermediaries may impose charges on their accountholders who beneficially own Class Y shares. All classes of shares have identical rights and voting privileges with respect to the Fund in general and exclusive voting rights on matters that affect that class alone. Earnings, net assets and net asset value per share may differ due to each class having its own expenses, such as transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees and shareholder communications, directly attributable to that class. Class A and C shares have, and Class B shares had, separate distribution and/or service plans under which they pay, and Class B shares paid, fees. Class Y shares do not pay such fees. Previously issued Class B shares automatically converted to Class A shares 72 months after the date of purchase.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed in the Fund’s preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Security Valuation.All investments in securities are recorded at their estimated fair value, as described in Note 3.
Allocation of Income, Expenses, Gains and Losses.Income, expenses (other than those attributable to a specific class), gains and losses are allocated on a daily basis to each class of shares based upon the relative proportion of net assets represented by such class. Operating expenses directly attributable to a specific class are charged against the operations of that class.
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders. Dividends and distributions to
|
69 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
shareholders, which are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. GAAP, are recorded on theex-dividend date. Income distributions, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly. Capital gain distributions, if any, are declared and paid annually or at other times as determined necessary by the Manager.
The tax character of distributions is determined as of the Fund’s fiscal year end. Therefore, a portion of the Fund’s distributions made to shareholders prior to the Fund’s fiscal year end may ultimately be categorized as a tax return of capital.
Investment Income.Dividend income is recorded on theex-dividend date or uponex-dividend notification in the case of certain foreign dividends where theex-dividend date may have passed.Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at the fair value of the securities received. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends, if any, and capital gains taxes on foreign investments, if any, have been provided for in accordance with the Fund’s understanding of the applicable tax rules and regulations. Interest income, if any, is recognized on an accrual basis. Discount and premium, which are included in interest income on the Statement of Operations, are amortized or accreted daily.
Custodian Fees. “Custodian fees and expenses” in the Statement of Operations may include interest expense incurred by the Fund on any cash overdrafts of its custodian account during the period. Such cash overdrafts may result from the effects of failed trades in portfolio securities and from cash outflows resulting from unanticipated shareholder redemption activity. The Fund pays interest to its custodian on such cash overdraft at a rate equal to the Prime Rate plus 0.35%. The “Reduction to custodian expenses” line item, if applicable, represents earnings on cash balances maintained by the Fund during the period. Such interest expense and other custodian fees may be paid with these earnings.
Security Transactions. Security transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses on securities sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
Indemnifications.The Fund’s organizational documents provide current and former Trustees and officers with a limited indemnification against liabilities arising in connection with the performance of their duties to the Fund. In the normal course of business, the Fund may also enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would be dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
Federal Taxes.The Fund intends to comply with provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its investment company taxable income to shareholders. Therefore, no federal income or excise tax provision is required. The Fund files income tax returns in U.S. federal and applicable state jurisdictions. The statute of limitations on the Fund’s tax return filings generally remains open for the three preceding fiscal reporting period ends. The Fund has analyzed its tax positions for
|
70 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018, including open tax years, and does not believe there are any uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Fund��s financial statements.
During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018, the did not utilize any capital loss carryforwards to offset capital gains realized in that fiscal year. Details of the fiscal year endedJuly 31, 2018 capital loss carryforwards are included in the table below.Capital loss carryforwards with no expiration, if any, must be utilized prior to those with expiration dates. Capital losses with no expiration will be carried forward to future years if not offset by gains.
| | | | |
Expiring | | |
| |
2019 | | $ | 35,463,515 | |
No expiration | | | 1,213,365,428 | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 1,248,828,943 | |
| | | | |
At period end, it is estimated that the capital loss carryforwards would be $35,463,515 expiring by 2019 and $1,362,934,162, which will not expire.The estimated capital loss carryforward represents the carryforward as of the end of the last fiscal year, increased or decreased by capital losses or gains realized in the first six months of the current fiscal year. During the reporting period, it is estimated that the Fund will not utilize any capital loss carryforward to offset realized capital gains.
Net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) may differ for financial statement and tax purposes. The character of dividends and distributions made during the fiscal year from net investment income or net realized gains are determined in accordance with federal income tax requirements, which may differ from the character of net investment income or net realized gains presented in those financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Also, due to timing of dividends and distributions, the fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the fiscal year in which the income or net realized gain was recorded by the Fund.
The aggregate cost of securities and other investments and the composition of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of securities and other investments for federal income tax purposes at period end are noted in the following table. The primary difference between book and tax appreciation or depreciation of securities and other investments, if applicable, is attributable to the tax deferral of losses or tax realization of financial statement unrealized gain or loss.
| | | | |
Federal tax cost of securities | | $ | 6,645,265,8351 | |
| | | | |
| |
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 294,773,045 | |
| |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (787,676,203) | |
| | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (492,903,158) | |
| | | | |
1.The Federal tax cost of securities does not include cost of $893,899,999, which has otherwise been recognized for financial reporting purposes, related to bonds placed into trusts in conjunction with certain investment transactions.
See the Inverse Floating Rate Securities note in Note 4.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
|
71 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncements. In March 2017, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”), ASU2017-08. This provides guidance related to the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Manager has evaluated the impacts of these changes on the financial statements and there are no material impacts.
During August 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued Final Rule ReleaseNo. 33-10532 (the “Rule”), Disclosure Update and Simplification. The rule amends certain financial statement disclosure requirements to conform to U.S. GAAP. The amendments to Rule6-04.17 of RegulationS-X (balance sheet) remove the requirement to separately state the book basis components of net assets: undistributed (over-distribution of) net investment income (“UNII”), accumulated undistributed net realized gains (losses), and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) at the balance sheet date. Instead, consistent with U.S. GAAP, funds will be required to disclose total distributable earnings. The amendments to Rule6-09 of RegulationS-X (statement of changes in net assets) remove the requirement to separately state the sources of distributions paid. Instead, consistent with U.S. GAAP, funds will be required to disclose the total amount of distributions paid, except that any tax return of capital must be separately disclosed. The amendments also remove the requirement to parenthetically state the book basis amount of UNII on the statement of changes in net assets. The requirements of the Rule were effective November 5, 2018, and the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the current reporting period have been modified accordingly. In addition, certain amounts within the Fund’s Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the prior fiscal period have been modified to conform to the Rule.
3. Securities Valuation
The Fund calculates the net asset value of its shares as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern Time, on each day the New York Stock Exchange (the “Exchange” or “NYSE”) is open for trading, except in the case of a scheduled early closing of the Exchange, in which case the Fund will calculate net asset value of the shares as of the scheduled early closing time of the Exchange.
The Fund’s Board has adopted procedures for the valuation of the Fund’s securities and has delegated theday-to-day responsibility for valuation determinations under those procedures to the Manager. The Manager has established a Valuation Committee which is responsible for determining a fair valuation for any security for which market quotations are not readily available. The Valuation Committee’s fair valuation determinations are subject to review, approval and ratification by the Fund’s Board at least quarterly or more frequently, if necessary.
|
72 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
Valuation Methods and Inputs
Securities are valued primarily using unadjusted quoted market prices, when available, as supplied by third party pricing services or broker-dealers.
The following methodologies are used to determine the market value or the fair value of the types of securities described below:
Equity securities traded on a securities exchange (including exchange-traded derivatives other than futures and futures options) are valued based on the official closing price on the principal exchange on which the security is traded, as identified by the Manager, prior to the time when the Fund’s assets are valued. If the official closing price is unavailable, the security is valued at the last sale price on the principal exchange on which it is traded, or if no sales occurred, the security is valued at the mean between the quoted bid and asked prices.Over-the-counter equity securities are valued at the last published sale price, or if no sales occurred, at the mean between the quoted bid and asked prices. Events occurring after the close of trading on foreign exchanges may result in adjustments to the valuation of foreign securities to more accurately reflect their fair value as of the time when the Fund’s assets are valued.
Corporate and government debt securities (of U.S. or foreign issuers) and municipal debt securities, short-term notes, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, and asset-backed securities are valued at the mean between the bid and asked prices utilizing evaluated prices obtained from third party pricing services or broker-dealers who may use matrix pricing methods to determine the evaluated prices. Pricing services generally price debt securities assuming orderly transactions of an institutional “round lot” size, but some trades may occur in smaller, “odd lot” sizes, sometimes at lower prices than institutional round lot trades. Standard inputs generally considered by third-party pricing vendors include reported trade data, broker-dealer price quotations, benchmark yields, issuer spreads on comparable securities, the credit quality, yield, maturity, as well as other appropriate factors.
Loans are valued at the mean between the bid and asked prices utilizing evaluated prices obtained from third party pricing services or broker-dealers. Standard inputs generally considered by third-party pricing vendors include information obtained from market participants regarding broker-dealer price quotations.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or when a significant event has occurred that would materially affect the value of the security, are fair valued either (i) by a standardized fair valuation methodology applicable to the security type or the significant event as previously approved by the Valuation Committee and the Fund’s Board or (ii) as determined in good faith by the Manager’s Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee considers all relevant facts that are reasonably available, through either public information or information available to the Manager, when determining the fair value of a security. Those standardized fair valuation methodologies include, but are not limited to, valuing securities at the last sale price or initially at cost and subsequently adjusting the value based on: changes in company specific fundamentals, changes in an appropriate securities index, or changes in the value of similar securities which may be further adjusted for any discounts related to security-specific resale restrictions. When possible, such methodologies use observable market inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices of similar securities, observable interest
|
73 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
rates, currency rates and yield curves. The methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities nor can it be assured that the Fund can obtain the fair value assigned to a security if it were to sell the security.
To assess the continuing appropriateness of security valuations, the Manager regularly compares prior day prices and sale prices to the current day prices and challenges those prices exceeding certain tolerance levels with the third party pricing service or broker source. For those securities valued by fair valuations, whether through a standardized fair valuation methodology or a fair valuation determination, the Valuation Committee reviews and affirms the reasonableness of the valuations based on such methodologies and fair valuation determinations on a regular basis after considering all relevant information that is reasonably available.
Classifications
Each investment asset or liability of the Fund is assigned a level at measurement date based on the significance and source of the inputs to its valuation. Various data inputs may be used in determining the value of each of the Fund’s investments as of the reporting period end. These data inputs are categorized in the following hierarchy under applicable financial accounting standards:
1) Level1-unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (including securities actively traded on a securities exchange)
2) Level2-inputs other than unadjusted quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and market corroborated inputs such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.)
3) Level3-significant unobservable inputs (including the Manager’s own judgments about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability).
The inputs used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities.
The table below categorizes amounts that are included in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities at period end based on valuation input level:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1— Unadjusted Quoted Prices | | | Level 2— Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | Level 3— Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | Value | |
| |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alabama | | $ | — | | | $ | 303,895,451 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 303,895,451 | |
Alaska | | | — | | | | 18,777,918 | | | | 107,500 | | | | 18,885,418 | |
Arizona | | | — | | | | 126,044,404 | | | | 4,631,060 | | | | 130,675,464 | |
Arkansas | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,810,600 | | | | 3,810,600 | |
California | | | — | | | | 822,961,490 | | | | 7,296,920 | | | | 830,258,410 | |
|
74 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1— Unadjusted Quoted Prices | | | Level 2— Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | Level 3— Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | Value | |
| |
Municipal Bonds and Notes (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Colorado | | $ | — | | | $ | 242,203,233 | | | $ | 8,311,950 | | | $ | 250,515,183 | |
Connecticut | | | — | | | | 62,778,079 | | | | — | | | | 62,778,079 | |
Delaware | | | — | | | | 1,079,485 | | | | — | | | | 1,079,485 | |
District of Columbia | | | — | | | | 206,743,283 | | | | — | | | | 206,743,283 | |
Florida | | | — | | | | 294,146,379 | | | | 128,532,504 | | | | 422,678,883 | |
Georgia | | | — | | | | 118,075,022 | | | | — | | | | 118,075,022 | |
Hawaii | | | — | | | | 24,261,436 | | | | — | | | | 24,261,436 | |
Idaho | | | — | | | | 2,743,720 | | | | — | | | | 2,743,720 | |
Illinois | | | — | | | | 415,716,601 | | | | 12,652,332 | | | | 428,368,933 | |
Indiana | | | — | | | | 143,294,971 | | | | — | | | | 143,294,971 | |
Iowa | | | — | | | | 12,991,483 | | | | 58,000 | | | | 13,049,483 | |
Kansas | | | — | | | | 718,688 | | | | 1,841,899 | | | | 2,560,587 | |
Kentucky | | | — | | | | 24,749,616 | | | | — | | | | 24,749,616 | |
Louisiana | | | — | | | | 22,110,412 | | | | 324,000 | | | | 22,434,412 | |
Maine | | | — | | | | 21,300,251 | | | | — | | | | 21,300,251 | |
Maryland | | | — | | | | 64,115,641 | | | | — | | | | 64,115,641 | |
Massachusetts | | | — | | | | 50,601,925 | | | | — | | | | 50,601,925 | |
Michigan | | | — | | | | 158,303,432 | | | | — | | | | 158,303,432 | |
Minnesota | | | — | | | | 51,268,281 | | | | — | | | | 51,268,281 | |
Mississippi | | | — | | | | 19,578,280 | | | | — | | | | 19,578,280 | |
Missouri | | | — | | | | 47,731,092 | | | | 5,156,450 | | | | 52,887,542 | |
Montana | | | — | | | | — | | | | 860,575 | | | | 860,575 | |
Nebraska | | | — | | | | 2,887,600 | | | | — | | | | 2,887,600 | |
Nevada | | | — | | | | 36,826,804 | | | | — | | | | 36,826,804 | |
New Hampshire | | | — | | | | 8,225,876 | | | | — | | | | 8,225,876 | |
New Jersey | | | — | | | | 116,996,547 | | | | — | | | | 116,996,547 | |
New Mexico | | | — | | | | 3,429,262 | | | | — | | | | 3,429,262 | |
New York | | | — | | | | 827,917,302 | | | | — | | | | 827,917,302 | |
North Carolina | | | — | | | | 24,800,738 | | | | — | | | | 24,800,738 | |
Ohio | | | — | | | | 491,014,078 | | | | — | | | | 491,014,078 | |
Oklahoma | | | — | | | | 19,645,208 | | | | — | | | | 19,645,208 | |
Oregon | | | — | | | | 24,437,137 | | | | — | | | | 24,437,137 | |
Pennsylvania | | | — | | | | 191,546,760 | | | | 2,994,373 | | | | 194,541,133 | |
Rhode Island | | | — | | | | 18,386,300 | | | | — | | | | 18,386,300 | |
South Carolina | | | — | | | | 58,843,557 | | | | 11,082,506 | | | | 69,926,063 | |
Tennessee | | | — | | | | 29,373,071 | | | | — | | | | 29,373,071 | |
Texas | | | — | | | | 597,768,866 | | | | 8,582,858 | | | | 606,351,724 | |
Utah | | | — | | | | 28,043,393 | | | | — | | | | 28,043,393 | |
Vermont | | | — | | | | 4,111,401 | | | | — | | | | 4,111,401 | |
Virginia | | | — | | | | 22,495,214 | | | | 4,405,678 | | | | 26,900,892 | |
Washington | | | — | | | | 108,619,029 | | | | — | | | | 108,619,029 | |
West Virginia | | | — | | | | 34,883,329 | | | | — | | | | 34,883,329 | |
Wisconsin | | | — | | | | 192,862,832 | | | | 41,200 | | | | 192,904,032 | |
U.S. Possessions | | | — | | | | 738,255,922 | | | | — | | | | 738,255,922 | |
|
75 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1— Unadjusted Quoted Prices | | Level 2— Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | Level 3— Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | Value | |
| |
Corporate Bonds and Notes | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,736,000 | | | $ | 4,736,000 | |
Corporate Loans | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,782,000 | | | | 2,782,000 | |
Common Stocks | | | 493,472 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 493,472 | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 493,472 | | | $ | 6,837,560,799 | | | $ | 208,208,405 | | | $ | 7,046,262,676 | |
| | | | |
Forward currency exchange contracts and futures contracts, if any, are reported at their unrealized appreciation/depreciation at measurement date, which represents the change in the contract’s value from trade date. All additional assets and liabilities included in the above table are reported at their market value at measurement date.
The table below shows the transfers between Level 2 and Level 3. The Fund’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the beginning of the reporting period.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Transfers out of Level 2* | | Transfers into Level 3* | |
| |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | |
Illinois | | $ | (2,006,400) | | | $ | 2,006,400 | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | (2,006,400) | | | $ | 2,006,400 | |
| | | | |
*Transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 because of the lack of observable market data due to a decrease in market activity for these securities.
The following is a reconciliation of assets in which significant unobservable inputs (level 3) were used in determining fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Value as of July 31, 2018 | | | Realized gain (loss) | | | Change in unrealized appreciation/ depreciation | | | Accretion/ (amortization) of premium/ discounta | |
| |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alaska | | $ | 145,125 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (37,625) | | | $ | — | |
Arizona | | | 4,754,221 | | | | — | | | | (43,161) | | | | — | |
Arkansas | | | 3,993,100 | | | | 57,495 | | | | (2,813) | | | | 12,818 | |
California | | | 13,813,520 | | | | 21,115 | | | | (3,641,600) | | | | (277,079) | |
Colorado | | | 8,032,350 | | | | — | | | | 279,600 | | | | — | |
Florida | | | 148,705,486 | | | | (23,439,147) | | | | 31,890,907 | | | | (10,340) | |
Illinois | | | 11,130,256 | | | | — | | | | 140,676 | | | | — | |
Indiana | | | 11 | | | | (385,576) | | | | 402,124 | | | | 883 | |
Iowa | | | 78,300 | | | | — | | | | (20,300) | | | | — | |
Kansas | | | 1,905,874 | | | | 6,883 | | | | 55,737 | | | | 17,420 | |
Louisiana | | | 336,000 | | | | — | | | | (12,000) | | | | — | |
Maryland | | | 788,513 | | | | (1,624,320) | | | | 1,683,454 | | | | 862 | |
|
76 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Value as of July 31, 2018 | | Realized gain (loss) | | | Change in unrealized appreciation/ depreciation | | | Accretion/ (amortization) of premium/ discounta | |
| |
Assets Table Continued | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Missouri | | $ | 5,574,360 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (318,603) | | | $ | — | |
Montana | | | 771,550 | | | | — | | | | 109,729 | | | | 27,303 | |
Pennsylvania | | | 2,921,340 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
South Carolina | | | 11,868,631 | | | | 45,170 | | | | (459,226) | | | | 8,931 | |
Texas | | | 6,437,258 | | | | — | | | | 2,145,600 | | | | — | |
Virginia | | | 3,881,048 | | | | — | | | | 524,630 | | | | — | |
Wisconsin | | | 41,200 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Corporate Bonds and Notes | | | 4,736,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Corporate Loans | | | 1,432,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 231,346,143 | | | $ | (25,318,380 | ) | | $ | 32,697,129 | | | $ | (219,202) | |
| | | | |
a. Included in net investment income.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Transfers into Transfers out of | | | Value as of January 31, | |
| | Purchases | | Sales | | | Level 3 | | | Level 3 | | | 2019 | |
| |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alaska | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 107,500 | |
Arizona | | | — | | | | (80,000) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,631,060 | |
Arkansas | | | — | | | | (250,000) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,810,600 | |
California | | | — | | | | (2,619,036) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,296,920 | |
Colorado | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,311,950 | |
Florida | | | 2,014,098 | | | | (30,628,500) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 128,532,504 | |
Illinois | | | — | | | | (625,000) | | | | 2,006,400 | | | | — | | | | 12,652,332 | |
Indiana | | | — | | | | (17,442) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Iowa | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 58,000 | |
Kansas | | | — | | | | (144,015) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,841,899 | |
Louisiana | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 324,000 | |
Maryland | | | — | | | | (848,509) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Missouri | | | — | | | | (99,307) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,156,450 | |
Montana | | | — | | | | (48,007) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 860,575 | |
Pennsylvania | | | 73,033 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,994,373 | |
South Carolina | | | — | | | | (381,000) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,082,506 | |
Texas | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,582,858 | |
Virginia | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,405,678 | |
Wisconsin | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 41,200 | |
Corporate Bonds and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,736,000 | |
Corporate Loans | | | 1,350,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,782,000 | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 3,437,131 | | | $ | (35,740,816) | | | $ | 2,006,400 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 208,208,405 | |
| | | | |
The total change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation included in the Statement of Operations attributable to Level 3 investments still held at period end:
|
77 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
| | | | |
| | Change in unrealized appreciation/ depreciation |
Assets Table | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | |
Alaska | | $ | (37,625) | |
Arizona | | | (43,161) | |
Arkansas | | | (2,813) | |
California | | | (3,929,100) | |
Colorado | | | 279,600 | |
Florida | | | 24,831,963 | |
Illinois | | | 140,676 | |
Iowa | | | (20,300) | |
Kansas | | | 55,737 | |
Louisiana | | | (12,000) | |
Missouri | | | (318,603) | |
Montana | | | 109,729 | |
South Carolina | | | (459,226) | |
Texas | | | 2,145,600 | |
Virginia | | | 524,630 | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 23,265,107 | |
| | | | |
The following table summarizes the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in determining fair value measurements for those investments classified as Level 3 at period end:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Value as of January 31, 2019 | | | Valuation Technique | | | Unobservable Input | | Range of Unobservable Inputs | | Unobservable Input Used | |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alaska | | $ | 107,500 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
Arizona | | | 4,631,060 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
Arkansas | | | 3,810,600 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
California | | | 7,296,920 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
Colorado | | | 8,311,950 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
Florida | | | 128,532,504 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
Illinois | | | 12,652,332 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
Iowa | | | 58,000 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
Kansas | | | 1,841,899 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
Louisiana | | | 324,000 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
Missouri | | | 5,156,450 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
Montana | | | 860,575 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
Pennsylvania | | | 2,994,373 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
South Carolina | | | 11,082,506 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
Texas | | | 8,582,858 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
Virginia | | | 4,405,678 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
Wisconsin | | | 41,200 | | | | Pricing service | | | N/A | | N/A | | | N/A (a) | |
|
78 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Value as of January 31, 2019 | | | Valuation Technique | | | Unobservable Input | | | Range of Unobservable Inputs | | | Unobservable Input Used | |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Discount to expected recovery | | |
| Discounted rate Expected recovery | | | | N/A | | | | 20% (b) | |
Corporate Bond and Note | | $ | 4,736,000 | | | | proceeds | | | | proceeds | | | | N/A | | | | 100% of par | |
| | | | | | | Discount to | | | | Discounted rate | | | | N/A | | | | 20% | |
| | | | | |
| Expected recovery | | |
| Expected recovery | | | | | | | | $1.79 | |
Corporate Loans | | | 1,432,000 | | | | proceeds | | | | proceeds | | | | $1.79 Million | | | | Million (c) | |
| | | | | |
| Expected recovery | | |
| Expected recovery | | | | | | | | 100% of par | |
Corporate Loans | | | 1,350,000 | | | | proceeds | | | | proceeds | | | | N/A | | | | (d) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 208,208,405 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) Securities classified as Level 3 whose unadjusted values were provided by a pricing service and for which such inputs are unobservable. The Manager periodically reviews pricing vendor methodologies and inputs to confirm they are determined using unobservable inputs and have been appropriately classified. Such securities’ fair valuations could change significantly based on changes in unobservable inputs used by the pricing service.
(b)The Fund fair values certain corporate bonds at a discount to the expected recovery value to reflect uncertainty and illiquidity. The Manager monitors such investments for additional market information or the occurrence of a significant event which would warrant are-evaluation of the security’s fair valuation. A significant increase (decrease) to the discount rate or a significant decrease (increase) to the expected recovery value will result in a significant decrease (increase) to the fair value of the investment.
(c)The Fund fair values certain corporate loans at a discount to the expected recovery proceeds to reflect uncertainty and illiquidity. The Manager monitors such investments for additional market information or the occurrence of a significant event which would warrant are-evaluation of the security’s fair valuation. A significant increase (decrease) to the discount rate or a significant decrease (increase) to the expected recovery value will result in a significant decrease (increase) to the fair value of the investment.
(d)The Fund fair values certain corporate loans at the expected recovery value when a pricing vendor is unable to provide coverage. The Manager monitors such investments for additional market information or the occurrence of a significant event which would warrant are-evaluation of the security’s fair valuation.
4. Investments and Risks
Inverse Floating Rate Securities.The Fund invests in inverse floating rate securities that pay interest at a rate that varies inversely with short-term interest rates. Because inverse floating rate securities are leveraged instruments, the value of an inverse floating rate security will change more significantly in response to changes in interest rates and other market fluctuations than the market value of a conventional fixed-rate municipal security of similar maturity and credit quality, including the municipal bond underlying an inverse floating rate security.
An inverse floating rate security is created as part of a financial transaction referred to as a “tender option bond” transaction. In most cases, in a tender option bond transaction the Fund
|
79 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
sells a fixed-rate municipal bond (the “underlying municipal bond”) to a trust (the “Trust”). The Trust then issues and sells short-term floating rate securities with a fixed principal amount representing a senior interest in the underlying municipal bond to third parties and a residual, subordinate interest in the underlying municipal bond (referred to as an “inverse floating rate security”) to the Fund. The interest rate on the short-term floating rate securities resets periodically, usually weekly, to a prevailing market rate and holders of these securities are granted the option to tender their securities back to the Trust for repurchase at their principal amount plus accrued interest thereon (the “purchase price”) periodically, usually daily or weekly. A remarketing agent for the Trust is required to attempt tore-sell any tendered short-term floating rate securities to new investors for the purchase price. If the remarketing agent is unable to successfullyre-sell the tendered short-term floating rate securities, a liquidity provider to the Trust must contribute cash to the Trust to ensure that the tendering holders receive the purchase price of their securities on the repurchase date.
Because holders of the short-term floating rate securities are granted the right to tender their securities to the Trust for repurchase at frequent intervals for the purchase price, with such payment effectively guaranteed by the liquidity provider, the securities generally bear short-term rates of interest commensurate with money market instruments. When interest is paid on the underlying municipal bond to the Trust, such proceeds are first used to pay the Trust’s administrative expenses and accrued interest to holders of the short-term floating rate securities, with any remaining amounts being paid to the Fund, as the holder of the inverse floating rate security. Accordingly, the amount of such interest on the underlying municipal bond paid to the Fund is inversely related to the rate of interest on the short-term floating rate securities. Additionally, because the principal amount of the short-term floating rate securities is fixed and is not adjusted in response to changes in the market value of the underlying municipal bond, any change in the market value of the underlying municipal bond is reflected entirely in a change to the value of the inverse floating rate security.
Typically, the terms of an inverse floating rate security grant certain rights to the Fund, as holder. For example, the Fund typically has the right upon request to require that the Trust compel a tender of the short-term floating rate securities to facilitate the Fund’s acquisition of the underlying municipal bond. Following such a request, the Fund pays the Trust the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities and a specified portion of any market value gain on the underlying municipal bond since its deposit into the Trust, which the Trust uses to redeem the short-term floating rate securities. The Trust then distributes the underlying municipal bond to the Fund. Through the exercise of this right, the Fund can voluntarily terminate or “collapse” the Trust, terminate its investment in the related inverse floating rate security and obtain the underlying municipal bond. Additionally, the Fund also typically has the right to exchange with the Trust (i) a principal amount of short-term floating rate securities held by the Fund for a corresponding additional principal amount of the inverse floating rate security or (ii) a principal amount of the inverse floating rate security held by the Fund for a corresponding additional principal amount of short-term floating rate securities (which are typically then sold to other investors). Through the exercise of this right, the Fund may increase (or decrease) the principal amount of short-term floating rate securities outstanding, thereby
|
80 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
increasing (or decreasing) the amount of leverage provided by the short-term floating rate securities to the Fund’s investment exposure to the underlying municipal bond.
The Fund’s investments in inverse floating rate securities involve certain risks. As short-term interest rates rise, an inverse floating rate security produces less current income (and, in extreme cases, may pay no income) and as short-term interest rates fall, an inverse floating rate security produces more current income. Thus, if short-term interest rates rise after the issuance of the inverse floating rate security, any yield advantage is reduced or eliminated. All inverse floating rate securities entail some degree of leverage represented by the outstanding principal amount of the related short-term floating rate securities, relative to the par value of the underlying municipal bond. The value of, and income earned on, an inverse floating rate security that has a higher degree of leverage will fluctuate more significantly in response to changes in interest rates and to changes in the market value of the related underlying municipal bond than that of an inverse floating rate security with a lower degree of leverage, and is more likely to be eliminated entirely under adverse market conditions. Changes in the value of an inverse floating rate security will also be more significant than changes in the market value of the related underlying municipal bond because the leverage provided by the related short-term floating rate securities increases the sensitivity of an inverse floating rate security to changes in interest rates and to the market value of the underlying municipal bond. An inverse floating rate security can be expected to underperform fixed-rate municipal bonds when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates is decreasing (or is already small) or when long-term interest rates are rising, but can be expected to outperform fixed-rate municipal bonds when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates is increasing (or is already large) or when long-term interest rates are falling. Additionally, a tender option bond transaction typically provides for the automatic termination or “collapse” of a Trust upon the occurrence of certain adverse events, usually referred to as “mandatory tender events” or “tender option termination events.” These events may include, among others, a credit ratings downgrade of the underlying municipal bond below a specified level, a decrease in the market value of the underlying municipal bond below a specified amount, a bankruptcy of the liquidity provider or the inability of the remarketing agent to re-sell to new investors short-term floating rate securities that have been tendered for repurchase by holders thereof. Following the occurrence of such an event, the underlying municipal bond is generally sold for current market value and the proceeds distributed to holders of the short-term floating rate securities and inverse floating rate security, with the holder of the inverse floating rate security (the Fund) generally receiving the proceeds of such sale only after the holders of the short-term floating rate securities have received proceeds equal to the purchase price of their securities (and the liquidity provider is generally required to contribute cash to the Trust only in an amount sufficient to ensure that the holders of the short-term floating rate securities receive the purchase price of their securities in connection with such termination of the Trust). Following the occurrence of such events, the Fund could potentially lose the entire amount of its investment in the inverse floating rate security.
Finally, the Fund may enter into shortfall/reimbursement agreements with the liquidity provider of certain tender option bond transactions in connection with certain inverse floating
|
81 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
rate securities held by the Fund. These agreements commit the Fund to reimburse the liquidity provider to the extent that the liquidity provider must provide cash to a Trust, including following the termination of a Trust resulting from the occurrence of a “mandatory tender event.” In connection with the occurrence of such an event and the termination of the Trust triggered thereby, the shortfall/reimbursement agreement will make the Fund liable for the amount of the negative difference, if any, between the liquidation value of the underlying municipal bond and the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities issued by the Trust. Under the standard terms of a tender option bond transaction, absent such a shortfall/ reimbursement agreement, the Fund, as holder of the inverse floating rate security, would not be required to make such a reimbursement payment to the liquidity provider. The Manager monitors the Fund’s potential exposure with respect to these agreements on a daily basis and intends to take action to terminate the Fund’s investment in related inverse floating rate securities, if it deems it appropriate to do so. At period end, the Fund’s maximum exposure under such agreements is estimated at $202,740,000.
When the Fund creates an inverse floating rate security in a tender option bond transaction by selling an underlying municipal bond to a Trust, the transaction is considered a secured borrowing for financial reporting purposes. As a result of such accounting treatment, the Fund includes the underlying municipal bond on its Statement of Investments and as an asset on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities (but does not separately include the related inverse floating rate security on either). The Fund also includes a liability on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities equal to the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest on the related short-term floating rate securities issued by the Trust. Interest on the underlying municipal bond is recorded as investment income on the Fund’s Statement of Operations, while interest payable on the related short-term floating rate securities is recorded as interest expense. At period end, municipal bond holdings with a value of $1,340,367,705 shown on the Fund’s Statement of Investments are held by such Trusts and serve as the underlying municipal bonds for the related $896,885,000 in short-term floating rate securities issued and outstanding at that date.
At period end, the inverse floating rate securities associated with tender option bond transactions accounted for as secured borrowings were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | Inverse Floater1 | | Coupon Rate2 | | | Maturity Date | | | Value | |
| | |
$ | 2,490,000 | | | Allen County, OH Hospital Facilities (Mercy Health) Tender Option Bond Series 2015XF-0235 Trust | | | 13.960 | % | | | 6/1/38 | | | $ | 2,903,240 | |
| 2,385,000 | | | Baltimore County, MD GO Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0682 Trust | | | 10.292 | | | | 3/1/40 | | | | 2,857,182 | |
| 4,530,000 | | | Birmingham-Jefferson, AL Civic Center Authority Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2667 Trust | | | 11.050 | | | | 7/1/48 | | | | 6,532,758 | |
| 3,220,000 | | | Birmingham-Jefferson, AL Civic Center Authority Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2668 Trust3 | | | 11.153 | | | | 5/1/48 | | | | 4,782,537 | |
|
82 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | Inverse Floater1 | | Coupon Rate2 | | | Maturity Date | | | Value | |
| | |
| $ 3,750,000 | | | CA Health Facilities Financing Authority (PSJH/ PH&S/PH&SW/PHSSC/LCMAS/PSJHCtr/PSJMC/ PH&SO/PH&SWW/SHlthS/SE/PacMedC Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2016-XF0330 Trust | | | 16.943% | | | | 7/1/39 | | | $ | 4,002,638 | |
| 3,855,000 | | | CA Health Facilities Financing Authority Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2104 Trust | | | 13.719 | | | | 7/1/39 | | | | 4,107,387 | |
| 5,000,000 | | | CA Infrastructure and Economic Devel. (Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine) Tender Option Bond Series 2016-XF0335 Trust | | | 8.160 | | | | 5/15/40 | | | | 5,448,050 | |
| 6,875,000 | | | Clark County, NV GO (Stadium Improvements) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2580 Trust | | | 11.428 | | | | 5/1/48 | | | | 10,640,850 | |
| 7,175,000 | | | CO Health Facilities Authority (Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health System) Tender Option Bond Series 2015 XF0239 Trust | | | 8.069 | | | | 7/1/36 | | | | 8,309,081 | |
| 8,745,000 | | | Denton, TX Independent School District Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0648 Trust | | | 14.369 | | | | 8/15/45 | | | | 13,306,130 | |
| 2,525,000 | | | Detroit, MI City School District Tender Option Bond Series 2015XF-0241 Trust3 | | | 17.538 | | | | 11/1/23 | | | | 4,524,876 | |
| 935,000 | | | FL Dept. of Transportation (Acquisition & Bridge Construction) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0680-1 Trust | | | 10.271 | | | | 7/1/37 | | | | 1,176,754 | |
| 1,010,000 | | | FL Dept. of Transportation (Acquisition & Bridge Construction) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0680-2 Trust | | | 10.284 | | | | 7/1/38 | | | | 1,254,996 | |
| 1,050,000 | | | FL Dept. of Transportation (Acquisition & Bridge Construction) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0680-3 Trust | | | 10.295 | | | | 7/1/39 | | | | 1,277,735 | |
| 1,090,000 | | | FL Dept. of Transportation (Acquisition & Bridge Construction) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0680-4 Trust | | | 10.305 | | | | 7/1/40 | | | | 1,312,382 | |
| 4,570,000 | | | Fremont, CA Union High School District Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0647 Trust | | | 10.412 | | | | 8/1/43 | | | | 4,992,542 | |
| 7,280,000 | | | Fulton County, GA Devel. Authority (PHC/FCommH/PHosp/PMSH/PNH/ PMCC/PClinic/PHlthCF/PHI/PHIP/PHHosp Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0024 Trust | | | 11.020 | | | | 6/15/29 | | | | 7,623,834 | |
| 3,465,000 | | | Fulton County, GA Devel. Authority (PHC/FCommH/PHosp/PMSH/PNH/ PMCC/PClinic/PHlthCF/PHI/PHIP/PHHosp Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series2015-XF0024-2 Trust | | | 11.810 | | | | 6/15/37 | | | | 3,640,086 | |
| 680,000 | | | Fulton County, GA Devel. Authority (PHC/FCommH/PHosp/PMSH/PNH/ PMCC/PClinic/PHlthCF/PHI/PHIP/PHHosp Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series2015-XF0024-3 Trust | | | 11.580 | | | | 6/15/29 | | | | 714,088 | |
|
83 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | Inverse Floater1 | | Coupon Rate2 | | | Maturity Date | | | Value | |
$ | 2,875,000 | | | Geisinger, PA Authority (Geisinger Health System) Tender Option Bond Series 2015XF-0040 Trust | | | 11.930% | | | | 6/1/39 | | | $ | 3,002,621 | |
| 5,000,000 | | | Grand Parkway, TX Transportation Corp. Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2034 Trust3 | | | 6.585 | | | | 4/1/53 | | | | 5,735,200 | |
| 8,135,000 | | | Grand Parkway, TX Transportation Corp. Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2669 Trust | | | 11.406 | | | | 10/1/48 | | | | 12,363,410 | |
| 3,750,000 | | | Grand Parkway, TX Transportation Corp. Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2669 Trust | | | 11.410 | | | | 10/1/43 | | | | 5,788,163 | |
| 5,000,000 | | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0023 Trust | | | 12.770 | | | | 4/1/44 | | | | 5,119,800 | |
| 4,345,000 | | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series2015-XF0023-2 Trust | | | 12.330 | | | | 4/1/44 | | | | 4,445,587 | |
| 2,750,000 | | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series2015-XF0023-3 Trust | | | 12.330 | | | | 4/1/44 | | | | 2,813,690 | |
| 2,500,000 | | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series2015-XF0023-4 Trust | | | 12.330 | | | | 4/1/44 | | | | 2,557,900 | |
| 2,200,000 | | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series2015-XF0023-5 Trust | | | 12.330 | | | | 4/1/44 | | | | 2,250,952 | |
| 1,250,000 | | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series2015-XF0023-6 Trust | | | 12.330 | | | | 4/1/44 | | | | 1,278,950 | |
| 3,125,000 | | | IL Finance Authority (CDHS/CDHA Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0025 Trust | | | 12.770 | | | | 11/1/39 | | | | 3,463,781 | |
| 1,250,000 | | | IL Finance Authority (CDHS/CDHA Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series2015-XF0025-2 Trust | | | 12.330 | | | | 11/1/39 | | | | 1,380,938 | |
| 3,140,000 | | | Lancaster County, SC School District Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2528 Trust3 | | | 7.651 | | | | 3/1/36 | | | | 3,764,577 | |
| 6,250,000 | | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Airports (Los Angeles International Airport) Tender Option Bonds Series2018-XF2724-2 Trust3 | | | 11.368 | | | | 5/15/43 | | | | 9,694,938 | |
| 13,940,000 | | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Airports Tender Option Bonds Series 2018-XF2724 Trust3 | | | 11.366 | | | | 5/15/44 | | | | 20,680,826 | |
| 2,880,000 | | | MA HFA Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2150 Trust3 | | | 7.222 | | | | 12/1/42 | | | | 2,910,960 | |
| 6,490,000 | | | MD Stadium Authority (Construction & Revitalization Program) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2581 Trust | | | 11.424 | | | | 5/1/47 | | | | 9,694,632 | |
| 5,000,000 | | | MD Stadium Authority (Construction & Revitalization Program) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2763 Trust | | | 11.430 | | | | 5/1/47 | | | | 7,455,800 | |
| 2,750,000 | | | Miami-Dade County, FL Transit System Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2762 Trust | | | 7.962 | | | | 7/1/45 | | | | 3,060,090 | |
|
84 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | Inverse Floater1 | | Coupon Rate2 | | | Maturity Date | | | Value | |
| | |
$ | 3,255,000 | | | Mississippi State University Educational Building Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2674 Trust3 | | | 10.125% | | | | 8/1/43 | | | $ | 3,575,455 | |
| 2,500,000 | | | Montgomery County, OH (Miami Valley Hospital) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0029 Trust | | | 12.540 | | | | 11/15/23 | | | | 3,093,775 | |
| 9,500,000 | | | North Central TX HFDC (CMCD/CMCtrF Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0034 Trust | | | 17.187 | | | | 2/15/33 | | | | 10,274,915 | |
| 2,500,000 | | | NY MTA (Green Bond) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2675 Trust3 | | | 15.186 | | | | 11/15/57 | | | | 3,967,075 | |
| 4,205,000 | | | NYC TFA Tender Option Bonds Series 2018- XF0716 Trust | | | 14.375 | | | | 5/1/41 | | | | 6,593,692 | |
| 13,360,000 | | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax) Tender Option Bond Series 2018XF-0717Trust | | | 14.379 | | | | 8/1/41 | | | | 20,499,183 | |
| 3,750,000 | | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax) Tender Option Bond Series 2018XF-2529 Trust | | | 10.684 | | | | 8/1/41 | | | | 4,250,475 | |
| 3,250,000 | | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax) Tender Option Bond Series 2018XF-2764 Trust | | | 14.747 | | | | 8/1/42 | | | | 5,119,108 | |
| 18,750,000 | | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax) Tender Option Bond Series 2019-XF2782 Trust3 | | | 11.458 | | | | 5/1/42 | | | | 28,447,500 | |
| 6,250,000 | | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority Tender Option Bonds Series 2018-XF0715 Trust | | | 14.382 | | | | 7/15/35 | | | | 10,377,000 | |
| 5,035,000 | | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority Tender Option Bonds Series 2018-XF0717 Trust | | | 14.382 | | | | 8/1/45 | | | | 7,600,735 | |
| 7,930,000 | | | NYS DA (Sales Tax) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0685 Trust | | | 14.222 | | | | 3/15/41 | | | | 12,514,333 | |
| 3,750,000 | | | NYS DA (Sales Tax) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0685 Trust | | | 14.222 | | | | 3/15/40 | | | | 5,943,113 | |
| 3,320,000 | | | NYS DA (Sales Tax) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0685 Trust | | | 14.213 | | | | 3/15/39 | | | | 5,304,928 | |
| 6,250,000 | | | NYS DA (Sales Tax) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0685 Trust | | | 14.222 | | | | 3/15/37 | | | | 10,222,563 | |
| 3,750,000 | | | NYS DA (Sales Tax) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0720 Trust | | | 14.382 | | | | 3/15/44 | | | | 5,608,875 | |
| 2,500,000 | | | NYS DA (Sales Tax) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2765 Trust | | | 11.430 | | | | 3/15/41 | | | | 4,005,325 | |
| 18,695,000 | | | NYS Liberty Devel. Corp. Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2146 Trust3 | | | 6.865 | | | | 1/15/44 | | | | 19,732,759 | |
| 2,760,000 | | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 200th Series Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF2487 Trust | | | 11.348 | | | | 4/15/57 | | | | 4,048,561 | |
| 3,250,000 | | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 205th Series Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF2489 Trust | | | 11.340 | | | | 5/15/57 | | | | 4,858,880 | |
| 2,500,000 | | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 206th Series Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF2488 Trust | | | 11.220 | | | | 11/15/47 | | | | 3,625,000 | |
| 500,000 | | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 206th Series Tender Option Bond Series2018-XF0683-1 Trust | | | 14.232 | | �� | | 11/15/42 | | | | 732,930 | |
| 2,435,000 | | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 206th Series Tender Option Bond Series2018-XF0683-2 Trust | | | 14.214 | | | | 11/15/47 | | | | 3,528,680 | |
| 6,755,000 | | | Riverside County, CA Transportation Commission Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF2520 Trust | | | 7.683 | | | | 6/1/36 | | | | 8,554,194 | |
|
85 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | Inverse Floater1 | | Coupon Rate2 | | | Maturity Date | | | Value | |
| | |
$ | 3,980,000 | | | Santa Clara County, CA GO Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0646 Trust | | | 10.415% | | | | 8/1/40 | | | $ | 4,376,368 | |
| 560,000 | | | Saugus, MA GO Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0681-1 Trust | | | 10.305 | | | | 3/1/39 | | | | 663,645 | |
| 625,000 | | | Saugus, MA GO Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0681-2 Trust | | | 10.305 | | | | 3/1/40 | | | | 721,363 | |
| 670,000 | | | Saugus, MA GO Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0681-3 Trust | | | 10.274 | | | | 3/1/41 | | | | 766,661 | |
| 690,000 | | | Saugus, MA GO Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0681-4 Trust | | | 10.274 | | | | 3/1/42 | | | | 783,074 | |
| 3,500,000 | | | South Miami, FL Health Facilities Authority (BHSF/BHM/HHI/SMH/MarH/DrsH/WKBP/ BOS/FHlth/BHlth/BethH Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2530 Trust | | | 7.737 | | | | 8/15/36 | | | | 3,944,115 | |
| 6,750,000 | | | Tarrant County, TX Health Facilities Devel. Corp. (CCMCtr/CCHCS/CCPN/WICF Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0028 Trust | | | 6.540 | | | | 12/1/33 | | | | 7,081,763 | |
| 375,000 | | | Tes Properties, WA Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0038 Trust | | | 12.620 | | | | 12/1/29 | | | | 393,206 | |
| 3,000,000 | | | Tes Properties, WA Tender Option Bond Series2015-XF0038-2 Trust | | | 13.050 | | | | 12/1/38 | | | | 3,144,240 | |
| 3,415,000 | | | TX Water Devel. Board Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2717 Trust | | | 11.459 | | | | 4/15/49 | | | | 5,380,298 | |
| 3,380,000 | | | TX Water Devel. Board Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2717 Trust | | | 11.455 | | | | 10/15/53 | | | | 5,274,862 | |
| 5,000,000 | | | TX Water Devel. Board Tender Option Bonds Series 2018-XF0714 Trust | | | 14.352 | | | | 4/15/49 | | | | 7,873,050 | |
| 8,705,000 | | | WA Health Care Facilities Authority (Peacehealth) Tender Option Bond Series 2015XF-0042 Trust | | | 6.360 | | | | 11/1/28 | | | | 9,105,865 | |
| 4,520,000 | | | WA Health Care Facilities Authority Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2035 Trust3 | | | 14.772 | | | | 10/1/36 | | | | 4,625,180 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 443,482,705 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1.For a list of abbreviations used in the Inverse Floater table see the Portfolio Abbreviations table at the end of the Statement of Investments.
2.Represents the current interest rate for the inverse floating rate security.
3.Represents an inverse floating rate security that is subject to a shortfall/reimbursement agreement.
The Fund may also purchase an inverse floating rate security created as part of a tender option bond transaction not initiated by the Fund when a third party, such as a municipal issuer or financial institution, transfers an underlying municipal bond to a Trust. For financial reporting purposes, the Fund includes the inverse floating rate security related to such transaction on its Statement of Investments and as an asset on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities, and interest on the security is recorded as investment income on the Fund’s Statement of Operations.
The Fund may invest in inverse floating rate securities with any degree of leverage (as measured by the outstanding principal amount of related short-term floating rate securities).
|
86 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
However, the Fund may only expose up to 35% of its total assets to the effects of leverage from its investments in inverse floating rate securities. This limitation is measured by comparing the aggregate principal amount of the short-term floating rate securities that are related to the inverse floating rate securities held by the Fund to the total assets of the Fund. The Fund’s exposure to the effects of leverage from its investments in inverse floating rate securities amounts to $896,885,000 or 12.53% of its total assets at period end.
Loans.The Fund invests in loans made to U.S. and foreign borrowers that are corporations, partnerships or other business entities. The Fund will do so directly as an original lender or by assignment or indirectly through participation agreements or certain derivative instruments. While many of these loans will be collateralized, the Fund can also invest in uncollateralized loans. Loans are often issued in connection with recapitalizations, acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, and refinancing of borrowers. The loans often pay interest at rates that float above (or are adjusted periodically based on) a benchmark that reflects current interest rates although the Fund can also invest in loans with fixed interest rates.
When investing in loans, the Fund generally will have a contractual relationship only with the lender, not with the relevant borrower. As a result, the Fund generally will have the right to receive payments of principal, interest, and any fees to which it is entitled only from the lender selling the participation and only upon receipt by the lender of the payments from the relevant borrower. The Fund may not directly benefit from the collateral supporting the debt obligation in which it has purchased the participation. As a result, the Fund will assume the credit risk of both the borrower and the institution selling the participation to the Fund.
Securities on a When-Issued or Delayed Delivery Basis.The Fund may purchase securities on a “when-issued” basis, and may purchase or sell securities on a “delayed delivery” basis. “When-issued” or “delayed delivery” refers to securities whose terms and indenture are available and for which a market exists, but which are not available for immediate delivery. Delivery and payment for securities that have been purchased by the Fund on a when-issued basis normally takes place within six months and possibly as long as two years or more after the trade date. During this period, such securities do not earn interest, are subject to market fluctuation and may increase or decrease in value prior to their delivery. The purchase of securities on a when-issued basis may increase the volatility of the Fund’s net asset value to the extent the Fund executes such transactions while remaining substantially fully invested. When the Fund engages in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions, it relies on the buyer or seller, as the case may be, to complete the transaction. Their failure to do so may cause the Fund to lose the opportunity to obtain or dispose of the security at a price and yield it considers advantageous. The Fund may also sell securities that it purchased on a when-issued basis or forward commitment prior to settlement of the original purchase.
At period end, the Fund had purchased securities issued on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis and sold securities issued on a delayed delivery basis as follows:
|
87 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
| | | | |
| | When-Issued or Delayed Delivery Basis Transactions | |
| |
Purchased securities | | | $53,122,350 | |
Sold securities | | | 29,551,590 | |
Restricted Securities.At period end, investments in securities included issues that are restricted. A restricted security may have a contractual restriction on its resale and is valued under methods approved by the Board of Trustees as reflecting fair value. Securities that are restricted are marked with an applicable footnote on the Statement of Investments. Restricted securities are reported on a schedule following the Statement of Investments.
Equity Security Risk.Stocks and other equity securities fluctuate in price. The value of the Fund’s portfolio may be affected by changes in the equity markets generally. Equity markets may experience significant short-term volatility and may fall sharply at times. Different markets may behave differently from each other and U.S. equity markets may move in the opposite direction from one or more foreign stock markets. Adverse events in any part of the equity or fixed-income markets may have unexpected negative effects on other market segments.
The prices of individual equity securities generally do not all move in the same direction at the same time and a variety of factors can affect the price of a particular company’s securities. These factors may include, but are not limited to, poor earnings reports, a loss of customers, litigation against the company, general unfavorable performance of the company’s sector or industry, or changes in government regulations affecting the company or its industry.
Credit Risk.The Fund invests in high-yield,non-investment-grade bonds, which may be subject to a greater degree of credit risk. Credit risk relates to the ability of the issuer to meet interest or principal payments or both as they become due. The Fund may acquire securities that have missed an interest payment, and is not obligated to dispose of securities whose issuers or underlying obligors subsequently miss an interest and/or principal payment.
In June 2016, Congress passed the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”). PROMESA established a federally-appointed fiscal oversight board (the “Oversight Board”) to oversee Puerto Rico’s financial operations and allows the Oversight Board to file cases on behalf of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or one of its instrumentalities to restructure debt and other obligations of the relevant entity in a “Title III” proceeding. Title III incorporates many provisions of the federal Bankruptcy Code for U.S. territories, and incorporates legal mechanisms for a litigation stay and restructuring of pension and debt obligations, among other provisions. In early May 2017, Title III petitions were filed for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”), two of the largest issuers of Puerto Rico debt. Title III petitions for Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority (“PRHTA”) and Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) were subsequently filed inmid-May and early July, respectively. Title III petitions for additional Puerto Rican instrumentalities may be filed. These restructuring proceedings create uncertainty as to the treatment of claims of varying degrees of seniority and the levels and
|
88 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
priorities of payment from the affected entities.
Information concerning securities not accruing interest at period end is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Cost | | $ | 1,154,039,515 | | | | | |
Market Value | | $ | 670,296,367 | | | | | |
Market Value as % of Net Assets | | | 10.93% | | | | | |
Concentration Risk.The Fund invests a large percentage of its total assets in obligations of issuers within its respective state and U.S. territories. Risks may arise from geographic concentration in any state, commonwealth or territory, such as Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam or the Northern Mariana Islands. Certain economic, regulatory or political developments occurring in the state, commonwealth or territory such as ongoing developments in Puerto Rico may impair the ability of certain issuers of municipal securities to pay principal and interest on their obligations.
5. Market Risk Factors
The Fund’s investments in securities and/or financial derivatives may expose the Fund to various market risk factors:
Commodity Risk. Commodity risk relates to the change in value of commodities or commodity indexes as they relate to increases or decreases in the commodities market. Commodities are physical assets that have tangible properties. Examples of these types of assets are crude oil, heating oil, metals, livestock, and agricultural products.
Credit Risk.Credit risk relates to the ability of the issuer of debt to meet interest and principal payments, or both, as they come due. In general, lower-grade, higher-yield debt securities are subject to credit risk to a greater extent than lower-yield, higher-quality securities.
Equity Risk. Equity risk relates to the change in value of equity securities as they relate to increases or decreases in the general market.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk. Foreign exchange rate risk relates to the change in the U.S. dollar value of a security held that is denominated in a foreign currency. The U.S. dollar value of a foreign currency denominated security will decrease as the dollar appreciates against the currency, while the U.S. dollar value will increase as the dollar depreciates against the currency.
Interest Rate Risk.Interest rate risk refers to the fluctuations in value of fixed-income securities resulting from the inverse relationship between price and yield. For example, an increase in general interest rates will tend to reduce the market value of already issued fixed-income investments, and a decline in general interest rates will tend to increase their value. In addition, debt securities with longer maturities, which tend to have higher yields, are subject to potentially greater fluctuations in value from changes in interest rates than obligations with shorter maturities.
Volatility Risk.Volatility risk refers to the magnitude of the movement, but not the direction of the movement, in a financial instrument’s price over a defined time period.
|
89 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
5. Market Risk Factors (Continued)
Large increases or decreases in a financial instrument’s price over a relative time period typically indicate greater volatility risk, while small increases or decreases in its price typically indicate lower volatility risk.
6. Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund has authorized an unlimited number of no par value shares of beneficial interest of each class. Transactions in shares of beneficial interest were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended January 31, 2019 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Class A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold1 | | | 43,078,158 | | | $ | 315,148,180 | | | | 98,331,285 | | | $ | 699,504,436 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 8,206,079 | | | | 60,019,872 | | | | 19,048,153 | | | | 135,863,268 | |
Redeemed | | | (54,189,876 | ) | | | (396,412,297 | ) | | | (124,100,367 | ) | | | (882,087,890 | ) |
Net decrease | | | (2,905,639 | ) | | $ | (21,244,245 | ) | | | (6,720,929 | ) | | $ | (46,720,186 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 15,892 | | | $ | 112,381 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | — | | | | — | | | | 44,586 | | | | 317,880 | |
Redeemed1 | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,148,003 | ) | | | (15,345,368 | ) |
Net decrease | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | (2,087,525 | ) | | $ | (14,915,107 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | 12,024,029 | | | $ | 87,585,064 | | | | 24,981,691 | | | $ | 177,177,211 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 2,901,939 | | | | 21,130,554 | | | | 7,003,230 | | | | 49,723,326 | |
Redeemed | | | (17,474,530 | ) | | | (126,986,179 | ) | | | (43,327,687 | ) | | | (306,603,743 | ) |
Net decrease | | | (2,548,562 | ) | | $ | (18,270,561 | ) | | | (11,342,766 | ) | | $ | (79,703,206 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class Y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | 71,362,721 | | | $ | 520,864,796 | | | | 144,887,702 | | | $ | 1,035,490,313 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 5,046,835 | | | | 36,890,985 | | | | 9,090,124 | | | | 64,858,937 | |
Redeemed | | | (75,809,357 | ) | | | (551,164,908 | ) | | | (88,858,588 | ) | | | (629,749,148 | ) |
Net increase | | | 600,199 | | | $ | 6,590,873 | | | | 65,119,238 | | | $ | 470,600,102 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. All outstanding Class B shares converted to Class A shares on June 1, 2018.
7. Purchases and Sales of Securities
The aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities, other than short-term obligations, for the reporting period were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Purchases | | | Sales | |
Investment securities | | $ | 1,865,277,989 | | | $ | 1,796,248,546 | |
|
90 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Management Fees.Under the investment advisory agreement, the Fund pays the Manager a management fee based on the daily net assets of the Fund at an annual rate as shown in the following table:
| | | | |
Fee Schedule | | | |
Up to $200 million | | | 0.60% | |
Next $100 million | | | 0.55 | |
Next $200 million | | | 0.50 | |
Next $250 million | | | 0.45 | |
Next $250 million | | | 0.40 | |
Next $10 billion | | | 0.35 | |
Over $11 billion | | | 0.34 | |
The Fund’s effective management fee for the reporting period was 0.37% of average annual net assets before any applicable waivers.
Sub-Adviser Fees.The Manager has retained theSub-Adviser to provide theday-to-day portfolio management of the Fund. Under theSub-Advisory Agreement, the Manager pays theSub-Adviser an annual fee in monthly installments, equal to a percentage of the investment management fee collected by the Manager from the Fund, which shall be calculated after any investment management fee waivers. The fee paid to theSub-Adviser is paid by the Manager, not by the Fund.
Transfer Agent Fees.OFI Global (the “Transfer Agent”) serves as the transfer and shareholder servicing agent for the Fund. The Fund pays the Transfer Agent a fee based on annual net assets, which shall be calculated after any applicable fee waivers. Fees incurred and average net assets for each class with respect to these services are detailed in the Statement of Operations and Financial Highlights, respectively.
Sub-Transfer Agent Fees.The Transfer Agent has retained Shareholder Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of OFI (the“Sub-Transfer Agent”), to provide theday-to-day transfer agent and shareholder servicing of the Fund. Under theSub-Transfer Agency Agreement, the Transfer Agent pays theSub-Transfer Agent an annual fee in monthly installments, equal to a percentage of the transfer agent fee collected by the Transfer Agent from the Fund, which shall be calculated after any applicable fee waivers. The fee paid to theSub-Transfer Agent is paid by the Transfer Agent, not by the Fund.
Trustees’ Compensation.The Fund has adopted an unfunded retirement plan (the “Plan”) for the Fund’s Independent Trustees. Benefits are based on years of service and fees paid to each Trustee during their period of service. The Plan was frozen with respect to adding new participants effective December 31, 2006 (the “Freeze Date”) and existing Plan Participants as of the Freeze Date will continue to receive accrued benefits under the Plan. Active
Independent Trustees as of the Freeze Date have each elected a distribution method with respect to their benefits under the Plan.
|
91 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)
During the reporting period, the Fund’s projected benefit obligations, payments to retired Trustees and accumulated liability were as follows:
| | | | |
Projected Benefit Obligations Increased | | $ | — | |
Payments Made to Retired Trustees | | | 28,426 | |
Accumulated Liability as of January 31, 2019 | | | 207,379 | |
The Fund’s Board of Trustees (“Board”) has adopted a compensation deferral plan for Independent Trustees that enables Trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from the Fund. For purposes of determining the amount owed to the Trustee under the plan, deferred amounts are treated as though equal dollar amounts had been invested in shares of the Fund or in other Oppenheimer funds selected by the Trustee. The Fund purchases shares of the funds selected for deferral by the Trustee in amounts equal to his or her deemed investment, resulting in a Fund asset equal to the deferred compensation liability. Such assets are included as a component of “Other” within the asset section of the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Deferral of Trustees’ fees under the plan will not affect the net assets of the Fund and will not materially affect the Fund’s assets, liabilities or net investment income per share. Amounts will be deferred until distributed in accordance with the compensation deferral plan.
Distribution and Service Plan(12b-1) Fees.Under its General Distributor’s Agreement with the Fund, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (the “Distributor”) acts as the Fund’s principal underwriter in the continuous public offering of the Fund’s classes of shares.
Service Plan for Class A Shares. The Fund has adopted a Service Plan (the “Plan”) for Class A shares pursuant to Rule12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the Plan, the Fund reimburses the Distributor for a portion of its costs incurred for services provided to accounts that hold Class A shares. Reimbursement is made periodically at an annual rate of up to
0.25% of the daily net assets of Class A shares of the Fund. The Distributor currently uses all of those fees to pay dealers, brokers, banks and other financial institutions periodically for providing personal service and maintenance of accounts of their customers that hold Class A shares. Any unreimbursed expenses the Distributor incurs with respect to Class A shares in any fiscal year cannot be recovered in subsequent periods. Fees incurred by the Fund under the Plan are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Distribution and Service Plan for Class C Shares.The Fund has adopted a Distribution and Service Plan (the “Plan”) for Class C shares, pursuant to Rule12b-1 under the 1940 Act to compensate the Distributor for distributing that share class, maintaining accounts and providing shareholder services. Under the Plan, the Fund pays the Distributor an annual asset-based sales charge of 0.75% on Class C shares’ daily net assets. The Fund also pays a service fee under the Plan at an annual rate of 0.15% of daily net assets. The Plan continues in effect from year to year only if the Fund’s Board of Trustees votes annually to approve their continuance at an in person meeting called for that purpose. Fees incurred by the Fund under
|
92 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)
the Plan are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Sales Charges.Front-end sales charges and CDSC do not represent expenses of the Fund. They are deducted from the proceeds of sales of Fund shares prior to investment or from redemption proceeds prior to remittance, as applicable. The sales charges retained by the Distributor from the sale of shares and the CDSC retained by the Distributor on the redemption of shares is shown in the following table for the period indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | Class A Front-End Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | | | Class A Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | | | Class C Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | |
January 31, 2019 | | | $253,892 | | | | $35,025 | | | | $38,673 | |
9. Borrowings and Other Financing
Borrowings.The Fund can borrow money from banks in amounts up to one third of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less all liabilities and indebtedness other than borrowings (meaning that the value of those assets must be at least 300% of the amount borrowed). The Fund can use those borrowings for investment-related purposes such as purchasing portfolio securities. The Fund also may borrow to meet redemption obligations or for temporary and emergency purposes. When the Fund invests borrowed money in portfolio securities, it is using a speculative investment technique known as leverage and changes in the value of the Fund’s investments will have a larger effect on its share price than if it did not borrow because of the effect of leverage.
The Fund can also use the borrowings for other investment-related purposes, including in connection with the Fund’s inverse floater investments as discussed in Note 4. The Fund may use the borrowings to reduce the leverage amount of, or unwind or “collapse” trusts that issued “inverse floaters” owned by the Fund, or in circumstances in which the Fund has entered into a shortfall and forbearance agreement with the sponsor of the inverse floater trust to meet the Fund’s obligation to reimburse the sponsor of the inverse floater for the difference between the liquidation value of the underlying bond and the amount due to holders of the short-term floating rate notes issued by the Trust. See the discussion in Note 4
(Inverse Floating Rate Securities) for additional information.
The Fund will pay interest and may pay other fees in connection with loans. If the Fund does borrow, it will be subject to greater expenses than funds that do not borrow. The interest on borrowed money and the other fees incurred in conjunction with loans are an expense that might reduce the Fund’s yield and return. Expenses incurred by the Fund with respect to interest on borrowings and commitment fees are disclosed separately or as other expenses on the Statement of Operations.
The Fund entered into a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “Agreement”) with conduit lenders and Citibank N.A. which enables it to participate with certain other
|
93 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
9. Borrowings and Other Financing (Continued)
Oppenheimer funds in a committed, secured borrowing facility that permits borrowings of up to $2.5 billion, collectively, by the Oppenheimer Rochester Funds. To secure the loan, the Fund pledges investment securities in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Securities held in collateralized accounts to cover these borrowings are noted in the Statement of Investments. Interest is charged to the Fund, based on its borrowings, at current commercial paper issuance rates (2.6263% at period end). The Fund pays additional fees monthly to its lender on its outstanding borrowings to manage and administer the facility and is allocated itspro-rata share of an annual structuring fee and ongoing commitment fees both of which are based on the total facility size. Total fees and interest that are included in expenses on the Fund’s Statement of Operations related to its participation in the borrowing facility during the reporting period equal 0.12% of the Fund’s average net assets on an annualized basis. The Fund has the right to prepay such loans and terminate its participation in the conduit loan facility at any time upon prior notice.
At period end, the Fund had borrowings outstanding at an interest rate of 2.6263%.
Details of the borrowings for the reporting period are as follows:
| | | | |
Average Daily Loan Balance | | $ | 92,400,000 | |
Average Daily Interest Rate | | | 2.355 | % |
Fees Paid | | $ | 1,030,078 | |
Interest Paid | | $ | 1,025,563 | |
Reverse Repurchase Agreements.The Fund may engage in reverse repurchase agreements. A reverse repurchase agreement is the sale of one or more securities to a counterparty at an agreed-upon purchase price with the simultaneous agreement to repurchase those securities on a future date at a higher repurchase price. The repurchase price represents the repayment of the purchase price and interest accrued thereon over the term of the repurchase agreement. The cash received by the Fund in connection with a reverse repurchase agreement may be used for investment-related purposes such as purchasing portfolio securities or for other purposes such as those described in the preceding “Borrowings” note.
The Fund entered into a Committed Repurchase Transaction Facility (the “Facility”) with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (the “counterparty”) which enables it to participate with certain other Oppenheimer funds in a committed reverse repurchase agreement facility that permits aggregate outstanding reverse repurchase agreements of up to $750 million, collectively. Interest is charged to the Fund on the purchase price of outstanding reverse repurchase agreements at current LIBOR rates plus an applicable spread. The Fund is also allocated itspro-rata share of an annual structuring fee based on the total Facility size and ongoing commitment fees based on the total unused amount of the Facility. The Fund retains the economic exposure to fluctuations in the value of securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements under the Facility and therefore these transactions are considered secured borrowings for financial reporting purposes. The Fund also continues to receive the economic benefit of interest payments received on securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements, in the form of a direct payment from the counterparty. These payments are included in
|
94 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
9. Borrowings and Other Financing (Continued)
interest income on the Statement of Operations. Total fees and interest related to the Fund’s participation in the Facility during the reporting period are included in expenses on the Fund’s Statement of Operations and equal 0.04% of the Fund’s average net assets on an annualized basis.
The securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements under the Facility are valued on a daily basis. To the extent this value, after adjusting for certain margin requirements of the Facility, exceeds the cash proceeds received, the Fund may request the counterparty to return securities equal in margin value to this excess. To the extent that the cash proceeds received exceed the margin value of the securities subject to the transaction, the counterparty may request additional securities from the Fund. The Fund has the right to declare each Wednesday as the repurchase date for any outstanding reverse repurchase agreement upon delivery of advanced notification and may also recall any security subject to such a transaction by substituting eligible securities of equal or greater margin value according to the Facility’s terms.
At period end, the Fund had no reverse repurchase agreements.
Details of reverse repurchase agreement transactions for the reporting period are as follows:
10. Pending Acquisition
On October 18, 2018, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, an indirect corporate parent of theSub-Adviser and the Manager, announced that it has entered into an agreement whereby Invesco Ltd. (“Invesco”), a global investment management company, will acquire theSub-Adviser (the “Transaction”). In connection with the Transaction, on January 11, 2019, the Fund’s Board unanimously approved an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “Agreement”), which provides for the transfer of the assets and liabilities of the Fund to a corresponding, newly formed fund (the “Acquiring Fund”) in the Invesco family of funds (the “Reorganization”) in exchange for shares of the corresponding Acquiring Fund of equal value to the value of the shares of the Fund as of the close of business on the closing date. Although the Acquiring Fund will be managed by Invesco Advisers, Inc., the Acquiring Fund will, as of the closing date, have the same investment objective and substantially similar principal investment strategies and risks as the Fund. After the Reorganization, Invesco Advisers, Inc. will be the investment adviser to the Acquiring Fund, and the Fund will be liquidated and dissolved under applicable law and terminate its registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The Reorganization is expected to be atax-free reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The Reorganization is subject to the approval of shareholders of the Fund. Shareholders of record of the Fund on January 14, 2019 will be entitled to vote on the Reorganization and will receive a combined prospectus and proxy statement describing the Reorganization, the shareholder meeting, and a discussion of the factors the Fund’s Board considered in approving the Agreement. The combined prospectus and proxy statement is expected to be distributed to shareholders of record on or about February 28, 2019. The anticipated date of the shareholder
|
95 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
10. Pending Acquisition (Continued)
meeting is on or about April 12, 2019.
If shareholders approve the Agreement and certain other closing conditions are satisfied or waived, the Reorganization is expected to close during the second quarter of 2019, or as soon as practicable thereafter. This is subject to change.
11. Subsequent Event
On February 4, 2019, the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico confirmed the Third Amended Title III Plan of Adjustment of Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”). As a result, during February 2019 the Fund received a combination of newly issued COFINA bonds and cash in exchange for legacy COFINA bonds. The resulting impact to the Fund’s net assets was less than 0.50%.
|
96 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
BOARD APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY
ANDSUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTSUnaudited
The Fund has entered into an investment advisory agreement with OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (“OFI Global” or the “Adviser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (“OFI” or the“Sub-Adviser”) (“OFI Global” and “OFI” together the “Managers”) and OFI Global has entered into asub-advisory agreement with OFI whereby OFI provides investmentsub-advisory services to the Fund (collectively, the “Agreements”). Each year, the Board of Trustees (the “Board”), including a majority of the independent Trustees, is required to determine whether to approve the terms of the Agreements and the renewal thereof. The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, requires that the Board request and evaluate, and that the Managers provide, such information as may be reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the Agreements. The Board employs an independent consultant to prepare a report that provides information, including comparative information that the Board requests for that purpose. In addition toin-person meetings focused on this evaluation, the Board receives information throughout the year regarding Fund services, fees, expenses and performance.
The Managers and the independent consultant provided information to the Board on the following factors: (i) the nature, quality and extent of the Managers’ services, (ii) the comparative investment performance of the Fund and the Managers, (iii) the fees and expenses of the Fund, including comparative fee and expense information, (iv) the profitability of the Managers and their affiliates, including an analysis of the cost of providing services, (v) whether economies of scale are realized as the Fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for Fund investors and (vi) other benefits to the Managers from their relationship with the Fund. The Board was aware that there are alternatives to retaining the Managers.
Outlined below is a summary of the principal information considered by the Board as well as the Board’s conclusions.
Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The Board considered information about the nature, quality and extent of the services provided to the Fund and information regarding the Managers’ key personnel who provide such services. The Managers’ duties include providing the Fund with the services of theSub-Adviser’s portfolio manager and investment team, who provide research, analysis and other advisory services in regard to the Fund’s investments; and securities trading services. OFI Global is responsible for oversight of third-party service providers; monitoring compliance with applicable Fund policies and procedures and adherence to the Fund’s investment restrictions; risk management; and oversight of theSub-Adviser. OFI Global is also responsible for providing certain administrative services to the Fund. Those services include providing and supervising all administrative and clerical personnel who are necessary in order to provide effective corporate administration for the Fund; compiling and maintaining records with respect to the Fund’s operations; preparing and filing reports required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; preparing periodic reports regarding the operations of the Fund for its shareholders; preparing proxy materials for shareholder meetings; and preparing the registration statements required by federal and state securities laws for the sale of the Fund’s shares. OFI Global also provides the Fund with office space, facilities and equipment.
|
97 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
BOARD APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY
ANDSUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTSUnaudited / Continued
The Board also considered the quality of the services provided and the quality of the Managers’ resources that are available to the Fund. The Board took account of the fact that theSub-Adviser has over fifty years of experience as an investment adviser and that its assets under management rank it among the top mutual fund managers in the United States. The Board evaluated the Managers’ advisory, administrative, accounting, legal, compliance and risk management services, among other services, and information the Board has received regarding the experience and professional qualifications of the Managers’ key personnel and the size and functions of their staff. In its evaluation of the quality of the portfolio management services provided, the Board considered the experience of Scott Cottier, the portfolio manager for the Fund, and theSub-Adviser’s investment team and analysts. The Board members also considered the totality of their experiences with the Managers as directors or trustees of the Fund and other funds advised by the Managers.
The Board considered information regarding the quality of services provided by affiliates of the Managers, which the Board members have become knowledgeable about through their experiences with the Managers and in connection with the review or renewal of the Fund’s service agreements or service providers. The Board concluded, in light of the Managers’ experience, reputation, personnel, operations and resources that the Fund benefits from the services provided under the Agreements.
Investment Performance of the Managers and the Fund. Throughout the year, the Managers provided information on the investment performance of the Fund, the Adviser and theSub-Adviser, including comparative performance information. The Board also reviewed information, prepared by the Managers and by the independent consultant, comparing the Fund’s historical performance to relevant benchmarks or market indices and to the performance of other retail funds in the high yield muni category. The Board noted that the Fund’sone-year andten-year performance was below its category median although its three-year and five-year performance was better than its category median.
Fees and Expenses of the Fund. The Board reviewed the fees paid to the Adviser and the other expenses borne by the Fund. The Board noted that the Adviser, not the Fund, pays theSub-Adviser’s fee under thesub-advisory agreement. The independent consultant provided comparative data in regard to the fees and expenses of the Fund and other retailfront-end load high yield muni funds with comparable asset levels and distribution features. The Board noted that the Fund’s contractual management fee and total expenses were lower than its peer group and category median.
Economies of Scale and Profits Realized by the Managers. The Board considered information regarding the Managers’ costs in serving as the Fund’s investment adviser andsub-adviser, including the costs associated with the personnel and systems necessary to manage the Fund, and information regarding the Managers’ profitability from their relationship with the Fund. The Board also considered that the Managers must be able to pay and retain experienced professional personnel at competitive rates to provide quality services to the Fund. The Board reviewed whether the Managers may realize economies of scale in managing and supporting the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund currently has management fee breakpoints, which are intended to share with Fund shareholders economies of scale that may exist as the Fund’s assets grow.
|
98 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
Other Benefits to the Managers. In addition to considering the profits realized by the Managers, the Board considered information that was provided regarding the direct and indirect benefits the Managers receive as a result of their relationship with the Fund, including compensation paid to the Managers’ affiliates.
Conclusions. These factors were also considered by the independent Trustees meeting separately from the full Board, assisted by experienced counsel to the Fund and to the independent Trustees. Fund counsel and the independent Trustees’ counsel are independent of the Managers within the meaning and intent of the Securities and Exchange Commission Rules.
Based on its review of the information it received and its evaluations described above, the Board, including a majority of the independent Trustees, decided to continue the Agreements through September 30, 2019. In arriving at its decision, the Board did not identify any factor or factors as being more important than others, but considered all of the above information, and considered the terms and conditions of the Agreements, including the management fees, in light of all the surrounding circumstances.
|
99 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
PORTFOLIO PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND GUIDELINES;
UPDATES TO STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTSUnaudited
The Fund has adopted Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Guidelines under which the Fund votes proxies relating to securities (“portfolio proxies”) held by the Fund. A description of the Fund’s Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Guidelines is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund toll-free at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677), (ii) on the Fund’s website at www.oppenheimerfunds.com, and (iii) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the Fund is required to file FormN-PX, with its complete proxy voting record for the 12 months ended June 30th, no later than August 31st of each year. The Fund’s voting record is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund toll-free at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677), and (ii) in the FormN-PX filing on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first quarter and the third quarter of each fiscal year on FormN-Q. The Fund’s FormN-Q filings are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Beginning in April 2019, the Fund will no longer file FormN-Qs and will instead disclose its portfolio holdings monthly on FormN-PORT, which will also be available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Householding—Delivery of Shareholder Documents
This is to inform you about OppenheimerFunds’ “householding” policy. If more than one member of your household maintains an account in a particular fund, OppenheimerFunds will mail only one copy of the fund’s prospectus (or, if available, the fund’s summary prospectus), annual and semiannual report and privacy policy. The consolidation of these mailings, called householding, benefits your fund through reduced mailing expense, and benefits you by reducing the volume of mail you receive from OppenheimerFunds. Householding does not affect the delivery of your account statements.
Please note that we will continue to household these mailings for as long as you remain an OppenheimerFunds shareholder, unless you request otherwise. If you prefer to receive multiple copies of these materials, please call us at1.800.CALL-OPP(225-5677).You may also notify us in writing or via email. We will begin sending you individual copies of the prospectus (or, if available, the summary prospectus), reports and privacy policy within 30 days of receiving your request to stop householding.
|
100 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
DISTRIBUTION SOURCESUnaudited
For any distribution that took place over the last six months of the Fund’s reporting period, the table below details on aper-share basis the percentage of the Fund’s total distribution payment amount that was derived from the following sources: net income, net profit from the sale of securities, and other capital sources. Other capital sources represent a return of capital. A return of capital may occur, for example, when some or all of the money that you invested in the Fund is paid back to you. A return of capital distribution does not necessarily reflect the Fund’s investment performance and should not be confused with “yield” or “income.” You should not draw any conclusions about the Fund’s investment performance from the amounts of these distributions. This information is based upon income and capital gains using generally accepted accounting principles as of the date of each distribution. If the Fund (or an underlying fund in which the Fund invests) invests in real estate investment trusts (REITs) and/or master limited partnerships (MLPs), the percentages attributed to each category are estimated using historical information because the character of the amounts received from the REITs and/or MLPs in which the Fund (or underlying fund) invests is unknown until after the end of the calendar year. Because the Fund is actively managed, the relative amount of the Fund’s total distributions derived from various sources over the calendar year may change. Please note that this information should not be used for tax reporting purposes as the tax character of distributable income may differ from the amounts used for this notification. You will receive IRS tax forms in the first quarter of each calendar year detailing the actual amount of the taxable andnon-taxable portion of distributions paid to you during the tax year.
For the most current information, please go to oppenheimerfunds.com. Select your Fund, and scroll down to the ‘Dividends’ table under ‘Analytics’.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fund Name | | Pay Date | | | Net Income | | | Net Profit from Sale | | | Other Capital Sources | |
| |
Oppenheimer Rochester High Yield Municipal Fund | | | 9/25/18 | | | | 79.5% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 20.5% | |
Oppenheimer Rochester High Yield Municipal Fund | | | 10/23/18 | | | | 66.2% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 33.8% | |
Oppenheimer Rochester High Yield Municipal Fund | | | 1/22/19 | | | | 62.2% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 37.8% | |
|
101 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND
| | |
Trustees and Officers | | Joel W. Motley, Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Trustee |
| | Beth Ann Brown, Trustee |
| | Edmund P. Giambastiani, Jr., Trustee |
| | Elizabeth Krentzman, Trustee |
| | Mary F. Miller, Trustee |
| | Joanne Pace, Trustee |
| | Daniel Vandivort, Trustee |
| | Brian F. Wruble, Trustee |
| | Arthur P. Steinmetz, Trustee, President and Principal Executive Officer |
| | Scott S. Cottier, Vice President |
| | Troy E. Willis, Vice President |
| | Mark R. DeMitry, Vice President |
| | Michael L. Camarella, Vice President |
| | Charles S. Pulire, Vice President |
| | Elizabeth Mossow, Vice President |
| | Richard Stein, Vice President |
| | Cynthia Lo Bessette, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer |
| | Jennifer Foxson, Vice President and Chief Business Officer |
| | Mary Ann Picciotto, Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Anti-Money |
| | Laundering Officer |
| | Brian S. Petersen, Treasurer and Principal Financial & Accounting Officer |
| |
Manager | | OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. |
| |
Sub-Adviser | | OppenheimerFunds, Inc. |
| |
Distributor | | OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. |
| |
Transfer and Shareholder Servicing Agent | | OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. |
| |
Sub-Transfer Agent | | Shareholder Services, Inc. |
| | DBA OppenheimerFunds Services |
| |
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | KPMG LLP |
| |
Legal Counsel | | Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP |
| |
| | The financial statements included herein have been taken from the records of the Fund without examination of those records by the independent registered public accounting firm. |
© 2019 OppenheimerFunds, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
102 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
PRIVACY NOTICE
As an Oppenheimer fund shareholder, you are entitled to know how we protect your personal information and how we limit its disclosure.
Information Sources
We obtainnon-public personal information about our shareholders from the following sources:
● | | Applications or other forms. |
● | | When you create a user ID and password for online account access. |
● | | When you enroll in eDocs Direct,SM our electronic document delivery service. |
● | | Your transactions with us, our affiliates or others. |
● | | Technologies on our website, including: “cookies” and web beacons, which are used to collect data on the pages you visit and the features you use. |
If you visit oppenheimerfunds.com and do not log on to the secure account information areas, we do not obtain any personal information about you. When you do log on to a secure area, we do obtain your user ID and password to identify you. We also use this information to provide you with products and services you have requested, to inform you about products and services that you may be interested in and assist you in other ways.
We do not collect personal information through our website unless you willingly provide it to us, either directly by email or in those areas of the website that request information. In order to update your personal information (including your mailing address, email address and phone number) you must first log on and visit your user profile.
If you have set your browser to warn you before accepting cookies, you will receive the warning message with each cookie. You can refuse cookies by turning them off in your browser. However, doing so may limit your access to certain sections of our website.
We use cookies to help us improve and manage our website. For example, cookies help us recognize new versus repeat visitors to the site, track the pages visited, and enable some special features on the website. This data helps us provide better service for our website visitors.
Protection of Information
We do not disclose anynon-public personal information (such as names on a customer list) about current or former customers to anyone, except as permitted by law.
Disclosure of Information
Copies of confirmations, account statements and other documents reporting activity in your fund accounts are made available to your financial advisor (as designated by you). We may also use details about you and your investments to help us, our financial service affiliates, or firms that jointly market their financial products and services with ours, to better serve your investment needs or suggest educational material that may be of interest to you. If this requires us to provide you with an opportunity to “opt in” or “opt out” of such information sharing with a firm not affiliated with us, you will receive notification on how to do so, before any such sharing takes place.
Right of Refusal
We will not disclose your personal information to unaffiliated third parties (except as permitted by law), unless we first offer you a reasonable opportunity to refuse or “opt out” of such disclosure.
|
103 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
PRIVACY NOTICEContinued
Internet Security and Encryption
In general, the email services provided by our website are encrypted and provide a secure and private means of communication with us. To protect your own privacy, confidential and/ or personal information should only be communicated via email when you are advised that you are using a secure website.
As a security measure, we do not include personal or account information innon-secure emails, and we advise you not to send such information to us innon-secure emails. Instead, you may take advantage of the secure features of our website to encrypt your email correspondence. To do this, you will need to use a browser that supports Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol.
● | | All transactions conducted via our websites, including redemptions, exchanges and purchases, are secured by the highest encryption standards available. SSL is used to establish a secure connection between your PC and OppenheimerFunds’ server. It transmits information in an encrypted and scrambled format. |
● | | Encryption is achieved through an electronic scrambling technology that uses a “key” to code and then decode the data. Encryption acts like the cable converter box you may have on your television set. It scrambles data with a secret code so that no one can make sense of it while it is being transmitted. When the data reaches its destination, the same software unscrambles the data. |
● | | You can exit the secure area by closing your browser or, for added security, you can use the Log Out button before you close your browser. |
Other Security Measures
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your personal account information. Our employees and agents have access to that information only so that they may offer you products or provide services, for example, when responding to your account questions.
How You Can Help
You can also do your part to keep your account information private and to prevent unauthorized transactions. If you obtain a user ID and password for your account, safeguard that information. Strengthening your online credentials–your online security profile–typically your user name, password, and security questions and answers, can be one of your most important lines of defense on the Internet. For additional information on how you can help prevent identity theft, visit https://www. oppenheimerfunds.com/security.
Who We Are
This joint notice describes the privacy policies of the Oppenheimer funds, OppenheimerFunds, Inc., each of its investment adviser subsidiaries, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. and OFI Global Trust Co. It applies to all Oppenheimer fund accounts you presently have, or may open in the future, using your Social Security number—whether or not you remain a shareholder of our funds. This notice was last updated as of November 2017. In the event it is updated or changed, we will post an updated notice on our website at oppenheimerfunds.com. If you have any questions about this privacy policy, email us by clicking on theContact Us section of our website at oppenheimerfunds.com, write to us at P.O. Box 5270, Denver, CO 80217-5270, or call us at800 CALL OPP (225 5677).
|
104 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
|
105 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
|
106 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
|
107 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
|
108 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
|
109 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
|
110 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
|
111 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-19-099391/g700677g24g04.jpg)
OppenheimerFunds®
The Right Way
to Invest
Visit us at oppenheimerfunds.com for24-hr access to
account information and transactions or call us at 800.CALL
OPP (800.225.5677) for24-hr automated information and
automated transactions. Representatives also available
Mon–Fri8am-8pm ET.
| | |
Visit Us oppenheimerfunds.com Call Us 800 225 5677 Follow Us ![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-19-099391/g700677g26x95.jpg)
| | Oppenheimer funds are distributed by OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. 225 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10281-1008 © 2019 OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. All rights reserved. RS0795.001.0119 March 25, 2019 |
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
Not applicable to semiannual reports.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not applicable to semiannual reports.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Not applicable to semiannual reports.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments.
a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this FormN-CSR.
b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures forClosed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers ofClosed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities byClosed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The Fund’s Governance Committee Provisions with Respect to Nominations of Directors/Trustees to the Respective Boards
None
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
Based on their evaluation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR270.30a-3(c)) as of 1/31/2019, the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer found the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurances that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in the reports that it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (a) is accumulated and communicated to registrant’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (b) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the rules and forms adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities forClosed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 13. Exhibits.
(a) | (1) Exhibit attached hereto. |
(2) Exhibits attached hereto.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust
| | |
| |
By: | | /s/ Arthur P. Steinmetz |
| | Arthur P. Steinmetz |
| | Principal Executive Officer |
Date: | | 3/15/2019 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | |
By: | | /s/ Arthur P. Steinmetz |
| | Arthur P. Steinmetz |
| | Principal Executive Officer |
Date: | | 3/15/2019 |
| | |
By: | | /s/ Brian S. Petersen |
| | Brian S. Petersen |
| | Principal Financial Officer |
Date: | | 3/15/2019 |