First Financial Service (FFKY) 10-Q 2010 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

Commission File Number 0-18832

First Financial Service Corporation

(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Kentucky	61-1168311
(State or other jurisdiction	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
of incorporation or organization)

2323 Ring Road	(270) 765-2131
Elizabethown, Kentucky 42701	(Registrant's telephone number,
(Address of principal executive offices)	including area code)
(Zip Code)

(270) 765-2131

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes x  No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨  No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ¨	Accelerated Filer x	Non-Accelerated Filer ¨	Smaller Reporting Company ¨
		(Do not check if a smaller  reporting company)

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes ¨  No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding as of July 31, 2010
Common Stock	4,725,823shares

 

FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICE CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Preliminary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements		3
Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	4
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	38
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	40
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION		40
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	40
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	40
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	41
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	41
Item 4.	Reserved	41
Item 5.	Other Information	41
Item 6.	Exhibits	41
SIGNATURES		42

2

PRELIMINARY NOTE REGARDING

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements in this report that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. First Financial Service Corporation (the “Corporation”) may make forward-looking statements in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by or with the approval of the Corporation.  Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (1) projections of revenues, income or loss, earnings or loss per share, capital structure and other financial items; (2) plans and objectives of the Corporation or its management or Board of Directors; (3) statements regarding future events, actions or economic performance; and (4) statements of assumptions underlying such statements.  Words such as “estimate,” “strategy,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “targeted,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.

Various risks and uncertainties may cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by our forward-looking statements.  In addition to those risks described under “Item 1A Risk Factors,” of this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following factors could cause such differences: changes in general economic conditions and economic conditions in Kentucky and the markets we serve, any of which may affect, among other things, our level of non-performing assets, charge-offs, and provision for loan loss expense; changes in interest rates that may reduce interest margins and impact funding sources; changes in market rates and prices which may adversely impact the value of financial products including securities, loans and deposits; changes in tax laws, rules and regulations; various monetary and fiscal policies and regulations, including those determined by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions (“KDFI”); competition with other local and regional commercial banks, savings banks, credit unions and other non-bank financial institutions; our ability to grow core businesses; our ability to develop and introduce new banking-related products, services and enhancements and gain market acceptance of such products; and management’s ability to manage these and other risks.

Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the statement to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

3

Item 1.	FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICE CORPORATION
	Consolidated Balance Sheets
	(Unaudited)

	June 30,			December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)	2010			2009
ASSETS:
Cash and due from banks	$	14,060		$	21,253
Interest bearing deposits		60,685			77,280
Total cash and cash equivalents		74,745			98,533
Securities available-for-sale		144,761			45,764
Securities held-to-maturity, fair value of $381 Jun (2010) and $1,176 Dec (2009)		378			1,167
Total securities		145,139			46,931
Loans held for sale		14,997			8,183
Loans, net of unearned fees		940,631			994,926
Allowance for loan losses		(20,953	)		(17,719	)
Net loans		934,675			985,390
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		8,515			8,515
Cash surrender value of life insurance		9,181			9,008
Premises and equipment, net		32,325			31,965
Real estate owned:
Acquired through foreclosure		14,703			8,428
Held for development		45			45
Other repossessed assets		151			103
Core deposit intangible		1,148			1,300
Accrued interest receivable		5,907			5,658
Deferred income taxes		3,969			4,515
Prepaid FDIC premium		5,747			7,022
Other assets		2,959			2,091
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,239,209		$	1,209,504
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	70,204		$	63,950
Interest bearing		1,009,081			985,865
Total deposits		1,079,285			1,049,815
Short-term borrowings		595			1,500
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		52,596			52,745
Subordinated debentures		18,000			18,000
Accrued interest payable		289			360
Accounts payable and other liabilities		1,936			1,952
TOTAL LIABILITIES		1,152,701			1,124,372
Commitments and contingent liabilities		-			-
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Serial preferred stock, $1 par value per share; authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 20,000 shares with a liquidation preference of $20,000		19,808			19,781
Common stock, $1 par value per share; authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 4,718,334 shares Jun 2010, and 4,709,839 shares Dec 2009		4,718			4,710
Additional paid-in capital		35,099			34,984
Retained earnings		26,886			26,720
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(3	)		(1,063	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY		86,508			85,132
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	1,239,209		$	1,209,504

See notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICE CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	June 30,						June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Interest and Dividend Income:
Loans, including fees	$	14,267		$	14,155		$	28,314		$	28,099
Taxable securities		878			305			1,371			613
Tax exempt securities		202			118			373			224
Total interest income		15,347			14,578			30,058			28,936
Interest Expense:
Deposits		4,890			4,346			9,759			8,846
Short-term borrowings		11			47			32			90
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		596			600			1,189			1,197
Subordinated debentures		331			329			658			658
Total interest expense		5,828			5,322			11,638			10,791
Net interest income		9,519			9,256			18,420			18,145
Provision for loan losses		3,274			1,913			5,026			3,958
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		6,245			7,343			13,394			14,187
Non-interest Income:
Customer service fees on deposit accounts		1,739			1,645			3,264			3,122
Gain on sale of mortgage loans		415			355			714			532
Loss on sale of investments		-			-			(23	)		-
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses		(11	)		(245	)		(183	)		(615	)
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income(before taxes)		-			-			-			215
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings		(11	)		(245	)		(183	)		(400	)
Loss on sale and write downs of real estate acquired through foreclosure		(438	)		(233	)		(464	)		(250	)
Brokerage commissions		107			99			200			192
Other income		369			469			811			897
Total non-interest income		2,181			2,090			4,319			4,093
Non-interest Expense:
Employee compensation and benefits		3,905			4,149			7,995			8,151
Office occupancy expense and equipment		768			808			1,572			1,656
Marketing and advertising		225			245			450			510
Outside services and data processing		668			795			1,398			1,588
Bank franchise tax		566			257			916			521
FDIC insurance premiums		694			788			1,354			967
Amortization of core deposit intangible		88			101			152			202
Other expense		1,720			1,301			3,071			2,632
Total non-interest expense		8,634			8,444			16,908			16,227
Income/(loss) before income taxes		(208	)		989			805			2,053
Income taxes/(benefits)		(146	)		274			112			577
Net Income/(loss)		(62	)		715			693			1,476
Less:
Dividends on preferred stock		(250	)		(213	)		(500	)		(480	)
Accretion on preferred stock		(13	)		(14	)		(27	)		(25	)
Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders	$	(325	)	$	488		$	166		$	971
Shares applicable to basic income/(loss) per common share		4,718,021			4,687,983			4,716,755			4,682,683
Basic income/(loss) per common share	$	(0.07	)	$	0.10		$	0.04		$	0.21
Shares applicable to diluted income/(loss) per common share		4,718,021			4,726,226			4,716,755			4,685,686
Diluted income/(loss) per common share	$	(0.07	)	$	0.10		$	0.04		$	0.21
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	-		$	0.19		$	-		$	0.38

See notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICE CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net Income/Loss)	$	(62	)	$	715		$	693		$	1,476
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale		1,381			371			1,448			610
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale for which a portion of other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized into earnings		(19	)		-			(47	)		-
Reclassification of realized amount on securities available-for-sale losses (gains)		11			236			157			376
Non-credit component of other-than-temporary impairment on held-to-maturity securities		-			-			-			(215	)
Reclassification of unrealized loss on held-to-maturity security recognized in income		20			-			49			-
Accretion (amortization) of non-credit component of other-than- temorary impairment on held-to-maturity securities		(1	)		2			(1	)		2
Net unrealized gain (loss) recognized in comprehensive income		1,392			609			1,606			773
Tax effect		(473	)		(207	)		(546	)		(263	)
Total other comphrehensive income (loss)		919			402			1,060			510
Comprehensive Income	$	857		$	1,117		$	1,753		$	1,986

The following is a summary of the accumulated other comprehensive income balances, net of tax:

	Balance			Current		Balance
	at			Period		at
	12/31/2009			Change		6/30/2010
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale	$	(925	)	$	1,028	$	103
Unrealized gains (losses) on held-to-maturity securities for which OTTI has been recorded, net of accretion		(138	)		32		(106	)
Total	$	(1,063	)	$	1,060	$	(3	)

See notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6

FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICE CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

(Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Shares				Amount				Additional Paid-in		Retained			Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss), Net of
	Preferred		Common		Preferred		Common		Capital		Earnings			Tax			Total
Balance, January 1, 2010		20,000		4,710	$	19,781	$	4,710	$	34,984	$	26,720		$	(1,063	)	$	85,132
Net income												693						693
Shares issued under dividend reinvestment program				1				1		12								13
Stock issued for employee benefit plans				7				7		56								63
Stock-based compensation expense										47								47
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale, net of tax															970			970
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on held-to-maturity securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment charge has been recorded, net of tax															32			32
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment charge has been recognized into earnings, net of reclassification and taxes															58			58
Dividends on preferred stock												(500	)					(500	)
Accretion of preferred stock discount		-		-		27		-		-		(27	)		-			-
Balance, June 30, 2010		20,000		4,718	$	19,808	$	4,718	$	35,099	$	26,886		$	(3	)	$	86,508

See notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

7

FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICE CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2010			2009
Operating Activities:
Net income	$	693		$	1,476
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		5,026			3,958
Depreciation on premises and equipment		872			828
Core deposit intangible amortization		152			202
Net amortization (accretion) available-for-sale		(911	)		128
Net amortization (accretion) held-to-maturity		-			7
Impairment loss on securities available-for-sale		134			376
Impairment loss on securities held-to-maturity		49			24
Loss on sale of investments available-for-sale		23			-
Gain on sale of mortgage loans		(714	)		(532	)
Origination of loans held for sale		(55,617	)		(80,084	)
Proceeds on sale of loans held for sale		49,517			84,043
Stock-based compensation expense		47			52
Prepaid FDIC premium		1,275			-
Changes in:
Cash surrender value of life insurance		(173	)		(180	)
Interest receivable		(249	)		(64	)
Other assets		(868	)		(963	)
Interest payable		(71	)		(25	)
Accounts payable and other liabilities		(16	)		115
Net cash from operating activities		(831	)		9,361
Investing Activities:
Sales of securities available-for-sale		500			-
Purchases of securities available-for-sale		(118,689	)		(18,590	)
Maturities of securities available-for-sale		21,504			871
Maturities of securities held-to-maturity		788			4,974
Net change in loans		46,180			(77,961	)
Net purchases of premises and equipment		(1,232	)		(2,725	)
Net cash from investing activities		(50,949	)		(93,431	)
Financing Activities
Net change in deposits		29,470			45,578
Change in short-term borrowings		(905	)		19,731
Repayments to Federal Home Loan Bank		(149	)		(138	)
Issuance of preferred stock, net		-			20,000
Issuance of common stock under dividend reinvestment program		13			2
Issuance of common stock for stock options exercised		-			50
Issuance of common stock for employee benefit plans		63			239
Dividends paid on common stock		-			(1,781	)
Dividends paid on preferred stock		(500	)		(480	)
Net cash from financing activities		27,992			83,201
(Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents		(23,788	)		(869	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		98,533			20,905
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	74,745		$	20,036
Supplemental noncash disclosures:
Transfers from laons to real estate owned	$	8,076		$	5,811

See notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

8

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation – The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of First Financial Service Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, First Federal Savings Bank.  First Federal Savings Bank has three wholly owned subsidiaries, First Service Corporation of Elizabethtown, Heritage Properties, LLC and First Federal Office Park, LLC.  Unless the text clearly suggests otherwise, references to "us," "we," or "our" include First Financial Service Corporation and its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Operating results for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may occur for the year ending December 31, 2010.  For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards – FASB ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, was issued in June 2009.  This statement amends and removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and limits the circumstances in which a financial asset, or portion of a financial asset, should be derecognized when the transferor has not transferred the entire financial asset to an entity that is not consolidated with the transferor in the financial statements being presented and/or when the transferor has continuing involvement with the transferred financial asset. The new standard became effective for us on January 1, 2010 and did not have a material impact.

FASB ASC 810, Consolidations, was also issued in June 2009 and amends tests for variable interest entities to determine whether a variable interest entity must be consolidated. This standard requires an entity to perform an analysis to determine whether an entity’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This statement requires ongoing reassessments of whether an entity is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and enhanced disclosures that provide more transparent information about an entity’s involvement with a variable interest entity. The new standard became effective for us on January 1, 2010 and did not have a material impact.

Newly Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards – FASB ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, was issued in July 2010.  The new disclosure guidance will significantly expand the existing requirements and will lead to greater transparency into a company’s exposure to credit losses from lending arrangements.  The extensive new disclosures of information as of the end of a reporting period will become effective for both interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2010.  Specific items regarding activity that occurred before the issuance of the ASU, such as the allowance roll-forward and modification disclosures, will be required for periods beginning after December 15, 2010.  The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2010-20 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new accounting guidance under Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06 that requires new disclosures and clarifies existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement as set forth in ASC Subtopic 820-10. The objective of the new guidance is to improve these disclosures and increase transparency in financial reporting. Specifically, the new guidance requires:

A reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value  measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers; and

In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements.

9

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (Continued)

In addition, the guidance clarifies the requirements of the following existing disclosures:

For purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting  entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and  liabilities; and

A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure  fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements.

ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009,  except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of  activity in Level 3 fair value measurements.  Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years  beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early  application is permitted.

10

2. SECURITIES

The amortized cost basis and fair values of securities are as follows:

			Gross		Gross
(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Securities available-for-sale:
June 30, 2010:
U.S. Treasury and agencies	$	80,864	$	507	$	-		$	81,371
Government-sponsored mortgage-backed residential		40,784		835		-			41,619
Equity		433		50		(10	)		473
State and municipal		20,643		694		(82	)		21,255
Trust preferred securities		1,890		-		(1,847	)		43
Total	$	144,614	$	2,086	$	(1,939	)	$	144,761
December 31, 2009:
U.S. Treasury and agencies	$	20,000	$	80	$	-		$	20,080
Government-sponsored mortgage-backed residential		9,632		171		(51	)		9,752
Equity		933		60		(3	)		990
State and municipal		14,604		399		(110	)		14,893
Trust preferred securities		1,983		-		(1,934	)		49
Total	$	47,152	$	710	$	(2,098	)	$	45,764

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrecognized		Unrecognized
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Securities held-to-maturity:
June 30, 2010:
Government-sponsored mortgage-backed residential	$	112	$	3	$	-	$	115
State and municipal		245		-		-		245
Trust preferred securities		21		-		-		21
Total	$	378	$	3	$	-	$	381
December 31, 2009:
Government-sponsored mortgage-backed residential	$	902	$	6	$	-	$	908
State and municipal		245		3		-		248
Trust preferred securities		20		-		-		20
Total	$	1,167	$	9	$	-	$	1,176

11

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. SECURITIES – (Continued)

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at June 30, 2010, by contractual maturity, are shown below.  Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily mortgage-backed and equity securities, are shown separately.

	Available for Sale				Held-to-Maturity
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Value		Cost		Value
Due in one year or less	$	-	$	-	$	245	$	245
Due after one year through five years		20,515		20,624		-		-
Due after five years through ten years		41,404		41,686		-		-
Due after ten years		41,478		40,359		21		21
Government-sponsored mortgage-backed residential		40,784		41,619		112		115
Equity		433		473		-		-
	$	144,614	$	144,761	$	378	$	381

For the June 30, 2010 six month period, proceeds from sales of available-for-sale equity securities were $500,000 and gross realized losses recognized in income were $23,000.  There were not any sales of available-for-sale securities for the June 30, 2009 period.

Investment securities pledged to secure public deposits and FHLB advances had an amortized cost of $29.2 million and fair value of $29.4 million at June 30, 2010 and a $28.6 million amortized cost and fair value of $28.8 million at December 31, 2009.

Securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 aggregated by major security type and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position are as follows:

June 30, 2010	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
Description of Securities	Value		Loss			Value		Loss			Value		Loss
Equity	$	75	$	(10	)	$	-	$	-		$	75	$	(10	)
State and municipal		2,545		(31	)		554		(51	)		3,099		(82	)
Trust preferred securities		-		-			43		(1,847	)		43		(1,847	)
Total temporarily impaired	$	2,620	$	(41	)	$	597	$	(1,898	)	$	3,217	$	(1,939	)

December 31, 2009	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
Description of Securities	Value		Loss			Value		Loss			Value		Loss
Government-sponsored mortgage-backed residential	$	5,141	$	(51	)	$	-	$	-		$	5,141	$	(51	)
Equity		75		(3	)		-		-			75		(3	)
State and municipal		1,161		(22	)		2,456		(88	)		3,617		(110	)
Trust preferred securities		-		-			49		(1,934	)		49		(1,934	)
Total temporarily impaired	$	6,377	$	(76	)	$	2,505	$	(2,022	)	$	8,882	$	(2,098	)

12

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. SECURITIES – (Continued)

We evaluate investment securities with significant declines in fair value on a quarterly basis to determine whether they should be considered other-than-temporarily impaired under current accounting guidance, which generally provides that if a security is in an unrealized loss position, whether due to general market conditions or industry or issuer-specific factors, the holder of the securities must assess whether the impairment is other-than-temporary.

Accounting guidance requires entities to split other than temporary impairment charges between credit losses (i.e., the loss based on the entity’s estimate of the decrease in cash flows, including those that result from expected voluntary prepayments), which are charged to earnings, and the remainder of the impairment charge (non-credit component) to accumulated other comprehensive income. This requirement pertains to both securities held to maturity and securities available for sale.

The unrealized losses on the state and municipal securities were caused primarily by interest rate decreases.  The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment.  Because we do not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that we will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, we do not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2010.  We also considered the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer and identified no matters that would indicate less than full recovery.

As discussed in Note 6 - Fair Value, the fair value of our portfolio of trust preferred securities, has decreased significantly as a result of the current credit crisis and lack of liquidity in the financial markets.  There are limited trades in trust preferred securities and the majority of holders of such instruments have elected not to participate in the market unless they are required to sell as a result of liquidation, bankruptcy, or other forced or distressed conditions.

To determine if the five trust preferred securities were other than temporarily impaired as of June 30, 2010, we used a discounted cash flow analysis.  The cash flow models were used to determine if the current present value of the cash flows expected on each security were still equivalent to the original cash flows projected on the security when purchased.   The cash flow analysis takes into consideration assumptions for prepayments, defaults and deferrals for the underlying pool of banks, insurance companies and REITs.

Management works with independent third parties to identify its best estimate of the cash flow estimated to be collected. If this estimate results in a present value of expected cash flows that is less than the amortized cost basis of a security (that is, credit loss exists), an OTTI is considered to have occurred. If there is no credit loss, any impairment is considered temporary. The cash flow analysis we performed included the following general assumptions:

· We assume default rates on individual entities behind the pools based on Fitch ratings for financial institutions and A.M. Best ratings for insurance companies.  These ratings are used to predict the default rates for the next several quarters.  Two of the trust preferred securities hold a limited number of real estate investment trusts (REITs) in their pools.  REITs are evaluated on an individual basis to predict future default rates.

· We assume that annual defaults for the remaining life of each security will be 37.5 basis points.

· We assume a recovery rate of 15% on deferrals after two years.

· We assume 2% prepayments through the five year par call and then 2% per annum for the remaining life of the security.

· Our securities have been modeled using the above assumptions by FTN Financial using the forward LIBOR curve plus original spread to discount projected cash flows to present values.

13

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. SECURITIES – (Continued)

Additionally, in making our determination, we considered all available market information that could be obtained without undue cost and effort, and considered the unique characteristics of each trust preferred security individually by assessing the available market information and the various risks associated with that security including:

· Valuation estimates provided by our investment broker;

· The amount of fair value decline;

· How long the decline in fair value has existed;

· Significant rating agency changes on the issuer;

· Level of interest rates and any movement in pricing for credit and other risks;

· Information about the performance of the underlying institutions that issued the debt instruments, such as net income, return on equity, capital adequacy, non-performing assets, Texas ratios, etc;

· Our intent to sell the security or whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery; and

· Other relevant observable inputs.

The following table details the five debt securities with other-than-temporary impairment at June 30, 2010 and the related credit losses recognized in earnings during the six months ended June 30 2010:

		Moody's											% of Current
		Credit		Current							Current		Deferrals and
(Dollars in thousands)		Ratings		Moody's					Estimated		Deferrals		Defaults
		When		Credit	Par		Book		Fair		and		to Current			OTTI
Security	Tranche	Purchased		Ratings	Value		Value		Value		Defaults		Collateral			Recognized
Preferred Term Securities IV	Mezzanine		A3	Ca	$	244	$	199	$	20	$	18,000		27	%	$	-
Preferred Term Securities VI	Mezzanine		A1	Caa1		259		21		21		33,000		81	%		49
Preferred Term Securities XV B1	Mezzanine		A2	Ca		1,004		782		14		159,050		27	%		45
Preferred Term Securities XXI C2	Mezzanine		A3	Ca		1,018		614		6		198,000		26	%		-
Preferred Term Securities XXII C1	Mezzanine		A3	Ca		503		305		3		395,500		29	%		89
Total					$	3,028	$	1,921	$	64						$	183

The table below presents a roll-forward of the credit losses recognized in earnings for the period ended June 30, 2010:

(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance January 1, 2010	$	862
Increases to the amount related to the credit loss for which other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized		183
Ending balance June 30, 2010	$	1,045

14

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3. LOANS

Loans are summarized as follows:

	June 30,			December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010			2009
Commercial	$	53,470		$	62,940
Real estate commercial		591,556			627,788
Real estate construction		12,982			14,567
Residential mortgage		174,306			178,985
Consumer and home equity		75,818			74,844
Indirect consumer		33,087			36,628
Loans held for sale		14,997			8,183
		956,216			1,003,935
Less:
Net deferred loan origination fees		(588	)		(826	)
Allowance for loan losses		(20,953	)		(17,719	)
		(21,541	)		(18,545	)
Loans Receivable	$	934,675		$	985,390

The allowance for loan loss is summarized as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Balance, beginning of period	$	18,810		$	15,072		$	17,719		$	13,565
Provision for loan losses		3,274			1,913			5,026			3,958
Charge-offs		(1,193	)		(2,813	)		(1,904	)		(3,406	)
Recoveries		62			64			112			119
Balance, end of period	$	20,953		$	14,236		$	20,953		$	14,236

Impaired loans are summarized below.  There were no impaired loans for the periods presented without an allowance allocation.

	As of the		As of the
	Six Months Ended		Year Ended
	June 30,		December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009
End of period impaired loans	$	37,028	$	37,998
Amount of allowance for loan loss allocated		7,095		4,111

15

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3. LOANS – (Continued)

We report non-performing loans as impaired.  Our non-performing loans were as follows:

	June 30,		December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009
Restructured	$	1,321	$	9,812
Loans past due over 90 days still on accrual		-		-
Non accrual loans		35,707		28,186
Total	$	37,028	$	37,998

We have allocated $255,000 of specific reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings as of June 30, 2010.  We are not committed to lend additional funds to debtors whose loans have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring.

4. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

The reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS is as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands,	June 30,						June 30,
except per share data)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Basic:
Net income/(loss)	$	(62	)	$	715		$	693		$	1,476
Less:
Preferred stock dividends		(250	)		(213	)		(500	)		(480	)
Accretion on preferred stock discount		(13	)		(14	)		(27	)		(25	)
Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders	$	(325	)	$	488		$	166		$	971
Weighted average common shares		4,718			4,688			4,717			4,683
Diluted:
Weighted average common shares		4,718			4,688			4,717			4,683
Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants		-			38			-			3
Weighted average common and incremental shares		4,718			4,726			4,717			4,686
Earnings/(Loss) Per Common Share:
Basic	$	(0.07	)	$	0.10		$	0.04		$	0.21
Diluted	$	(0.07	)	$	0.10		$	0.04		$	0.21

Stock options for 237,949 shares of common stock were not included in the June 30, 2010 computation of diluted earnings per share for the quarter and year to date because their impact was anti-dilutive.  Stock options for 127,590 and 157,805 shares of common stock were not included in the June 30, 2009 computation of diluted earnings per share for the quarter and year to date because their impact was anti-dilutive. Warrants to purchase 215,983 shares at June 30, 2010 and 2009 were not included in the quarter and year to date computation because their impact was anti-dilutive.

5.           STOCK OPTION PLAN

Our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, which is shareholder approved, succeeded our 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Under the 2006 Plan, we may grant either incentive or non-qualified stock options tokey employees and directorsfor a total of 647,350 shares of our common stock at not less than fair value at the date such options are granted.Options available for future grant under the 1998 Plan totaled 38,500 shares and were rolled into the 2006 Plan.We believe that the ability to award stock options and other forms of stock-based incentive compensation can assist us in attracting and retaining key employees. Stock-based incentive compensation is also a means to align the interests of key employees with those of our shareholders by providing awards intended to reward  recipients for our long-term growth.The option to purchase shares vest over periods of one to five years and expire ten years after the date of grant.We issue new shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options. At June 30, 2010 options available for future grant under the 2006 Plan totaled 494,750.Compensation cost related to options granted under the 1998 and 2006 Plans that was charged against earnings for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010and 2009 was $47,000 and $52,000.

16

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5.  STOCK OPTION PLAN– (Continued)

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses various weighted-average assumptions.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.  The expected volatility is based on the fluctuation in the price of a share of stock over the period for which the option is being valued and the expected life of the options granted represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding.  There were no stock option grants for the June 30, 2010 period.

A summary of option activity under the 1998 and 2006 Plans as of June 30, 2010 is presented below:

						Weighted
				Weighted		Average
	Number			Average		Remaining		Aggregate
	of			Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Options			Price		Term		Value
								(Dollars In Thousands)
Outstanding, beginning of period		279,706		$	15.12
Granted during period		-			-
Forfeited during period		(1,757	)		11.61
Exercised during period		-			-
Cancelled during period		(40,000	)		9.06
Outstanding, end of period		237,949		$	16.17		7.0	$	-
Eligible for exercise at period end		103,141		$	20.16		4.7	$	-

There were no options exercised, modified or settled in cash for the period ended June 30, 2010.  The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the period ended June 30, 2009 was $116,000.  There was no tax benefit recognized from the option exercises as they are considered incentive stock options.  Management expects all outstanding unvested options will vest.

As of June 30, 2010 there was $221,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the 1998 and 2006 Plans.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.1 years.  Cash received from option exercises under all share-based payment arrangements for the periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $0 and $50,000.

6. FAIR VALUE

U.S. GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the use of inputs used in valuation methodologies into the following three levels:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.  A quoted price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and shall be used to measure fair value whenever available.

17

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6. FAIR VALUE – (Continued)

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

We used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value of available-for-sale-securities.

Available-for-sale securities: The fair values of some equity securities are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs).  The fair values of most debt securities are determined by a matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).  In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within (Level 3) of the valuation hierarchy.  For trust preferred securities, discounted cash flows are calculated using spread to swap and LIBOR curves that are updated to incorporate loss severities, volatility, credit spread and optionality.  Rating agency and industry research reports as well as defaults and deferrals on individual securities are reviewed and incorporated into the calculations.  For other equity securities, discounted cash flows are calculated with available market information through processes using benchmark yields, market spreads sourced from new issues, dealer quotes and trade prices among other sources.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
	June 30,		Identical Assets		Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
U.S. Treasury and agencies	$	81,371	$	-	$	81,371	$	-
Government-sponsored mortgage-backed residential		41,619		-		41,619		-
Equity		473		182		-		291
State and municipal		21,255		-		21,255		-
Trust preferred securities		43		-		-		43
Total	$	144,761	$	182	$	144,245	$	334

			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
	December 31,		Identical Assets		Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
(Dollars in thousands)	2009		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
U.S. Treasury and agencies	$	20,080	$	-	$	20,080	$	-
Government-sponsored mortgage-backed residential		9,752		-		9,752		-
Equity		990		699		-		291
State and municipal		14,893		-		14,893		-
Trust preferred securities		49		-		-		49
Total	$	45,764	$	699	$	44,725	$	340

18

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6. FAIR VALUE - (Continued)

Between June 2002 and July 2006, we invested in four AFS and one HTM investment grade tranches of trust preferred collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) securities.  The securities were issued and are referred to as Preferred Term Securities Limited (“PreTSL”).  The underlying collateral for the PreTSL is unguaranteed pooled trust preferred securities issued by banks, insurance companies and REITs geographically dispersed across the United States.  We hold five PreTSL securities, none of which are currently investment grade.  Prior to September 30, 2008, we determined the fair value of the trust preferred securities using a valuation technique based on Level 2 inputs.  The Level 2 inputs included estimates of the market value for each security provided through our investment broker.

Since late 2007, the markets for collateralized debt obligations and trust preferred securities have become increasingly inactive.  The inactivity began in late 2007 when new issues of similar securities were discounted in order to complete the offering.  Beginning in the second quarter of 2008, the purchase and sale activity of these securities substantially decreased as investors elected to hold the securities instead of selling them at substantially depressed prices.  Our brokers have indicated that little if any activity is occurring in this sector and that the PreTSL securities trades that are taking place are primarily distressed sales where the seller must liquidate as a result of insolvency, redemptions or closure of a fund holding the security, or other distressed conditions.  As a result, the bid-ask spreads have widened significantly and the volume of trades decreased significantly compared to historical volumes.

During 2008, we determined that the market for the trust preferred securities that we hold and for similar CDO securities (such as higher-rated tranches within the same CDO security) are also not active.  That determination was made considering that there are few observable transactions for the trust preferred securities or similar CDO securities and the observable prices for those transactions have varied substantially over time.  Consequently, we have considered those observable inputs and determined that our trust preferred securities are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

We have determined that an income approach valuation technique (using cash flows and present value techniques) that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs is equally or more representative of fair value than relying on the estimation of market value technique used at prior measurement dates, which now has few observable inputs and relies on an inactive market with distressed sales conditions that would require significant adjustments.  

We received valuation estimates on our trust preferred securities for June 30, 2010.  Those valuation estimates were based on proprietary pricing models utilizing significant unobservable inputs in an inactive market with distressed sales, Level 3 inputs, rather than actual transactions in an active market.  In accordance with current accounting guidance, we determined that a risk-adjusted discount rate appropriately reflects the reporting entity’s estimate of the assumptions that market participants would use in an active market to estimate the selling price of the asset at the measurement date.  

We conduct a thorough review of fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis.  Reclassification of certain financial instruments may occur when input observability changes.

19

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6. FAIR VALUE - (Continued)

The table below presents a reconciliation and income statement classification of gains and losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Fair Value Measurements
	Using Significant
	Unobservable Inputs
	(Level 3)
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Beginning balance	$	335		$	330		$	340		$	364
Total gains or losses:
Impairment charges on securities		(11	)		(236	)		(134	)		(376	)
Included in other comprehensive income		10			445			128			551
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		-			-			-			-
Ending balance	$	334		$	539		$	334		$	539

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below:

			Quoted Prices in
			Active Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
	June 30,		Identical Assets		Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
Impaired loans	$	29,933	$	-	$	-	$	29,933
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		14,703		-		-		14,703
Trust preferred security held-to-maturity		21		-		-		21

			Quoted Prices in
			Active Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
	December 31,		Identical Assets		Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
(Dollars in thousands)	2009		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
Impaired loans	$	33,887	$	-	$	-	$	33,887
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		8,428		-		-		8,428
Trust preferred security held-to-maturity		20		-		-		20

Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $37.0 million, with a valuation allowance of $7.1 million, resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $3.5 million and $4.8 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010.  Values for collateral dependent loans are generally based on appraisals obtained from licensed real estate appraisals and in certain circumstances consideration of offers obtained to purchase properties prior to foreclosure.  Appraisals for commercial real estate generally use three methods to derive value: cost, sales or market comparison and income approach.  The cost method bases value on the estimated cost to replace the current property after considering adjustments for depreciation.  Values of the market comparison approach evaluate the sales price of similar properties in the same market area.  The income approach considers net operating income generated by the property and an investors required return.  The final value is a reconciliation of these three approaches and takes into consideration any other factors management deems relevant to arrive at a representative fair value.

20

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6. FAIR VALUE - (Continued)

Real estate owned acquired through foreclosure is recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs at the date of foreclosure.  Fair value is based on the appraised market value of the property based on sales of similar assets.  The fair value may be subsequently reduced if the estimated fair value declines below the original appraised value.  Fair value adjustments of $388,000 were made to real estate owned during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010.

Trust preferred securities which are held-to-maturity are valued using an income approach valuation technique (using cash flows and present value techniques) that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. The income approach is equally or more representative of fair value than relying on the estimation of market value technique used at prior measurement dates, which now has few observable inputs and relies on an inactive market with distressed sales conditions that would require significant adjustments.  

We received valuation estimates on our trust preferred security for June 30, 2010.  Those valuation estimates were based on proprietary pricing models utilizing significant unobservable inputs in an inactive market with distressed sales, Level 3 inputs, rather than actual transactions in an active market.  

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The estimated fair value of financial instruments not previously presented is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Value		Value		Value		Value
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	74,745	$	74,745	$	98,533	$	98,533
Securities held-to-maturity		357		360		1,147		1,156
Loans held for sale		14,997		15,216		8,183		8,257
Loans, net		920,649		919,725		977,207		982,584
Accrued interest receivable		5,907		5,907		5,658		5,658
FHLB stock		8,515		N/A		8,515		N/A
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		1,079,285		1,069,660		1,049,815		1,042,957
Short-term borrowings		595		595		1,500		1,500
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		52,596		53,392		52,745		55,856
Subordinated debentures		18,000		12,743		18,000		12,743
Accrued interest payable		289		289		360		360

The methods and assumptions used in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments are presented below:

Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, interest bearing deposits, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short-term debt and variable rate loans or deposits that re-price frequently and fully.  Held-to-maturity securities fair values are based on market prices or dealer quotes and if no such information is available, on the rate and term of the security and information about the issuer.  The value of loans held for sale is based on the underlying sale commitments.  For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent re-pricing or re-pricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life.  Fair values of advances from Federal Home Loan Bank and subordinated debentures are based on current rates for similar financing.  The fair value of off-balance-sheet items is based on the current fees or cost that would be charged to enter into or terminate such arrangements and is not material.  It is not practicable to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.

21

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7. PREFERRED STOCK

On January 9, 2009, we issued $20 million of cumulative perpetual preferred shares, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “Senior Preferred Shares”) to the United States Treasury under its Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”). The Senior Preferred Shares constitute Tier 1 capital and rank senior to our common shares. The Senior Preferred Shares pay cumulative dividends quarterly at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years and will reset to a rate of 9% per annum after five years. The Senior Preferred Shares may be redeemed at any time, at our option. We also have the ability to defer dividend payments at any time, at our option.

We also issued a warrant to purchase 215,983 common shares to the U.S. Treasury at a purchase price of $13.89 per share. The aggregate purchase price equals 15% of the aggregate amount of the Senior Preferred Shares purchased by the U.S. Treasury or $3 million. The initial purchase price per share for the warrant and the number of common shares subject to the warrant were determined by reference to the market price of the common shares (calculated on a 20-day trailing average) on December 8, 2008, the date the U.S. Treasury approved our TARP application. The warrant has a term of 10 years and is potentially dilutive to earnings per share.

Participation in the CPP requires a participating institution to comply with a number of restrictions and provisions, including standards for executive compensation and corporate governance and limitations on share repurchases and the declaration and payment of dividends on common shares. The standard terms of the CPP require that a participating financial institution limit the payment of dividends to the most recent quarterly amount prior to October 14, 2008, which is $0.19 per share in our case. This dividend limitation will remain in effect until the earlier of three years or such time that the preferred shares are redeemed.

On February 17, 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) was enacted. As required by ARRA, the U.S. Treasury has issued additional compensation standards on companies receiving financial assistance from the U.S. government. In addition, ARRA imposes certain new executive compensation and corporate expenditure limits on each CPP recipient, until the recipient has repaid the Treasury.  ARRA also permits CPP participants to redeem the preferred shares held by the Treasury Department without penalty and without the need to raise new capital, subject to the Treasury’s consultation with the recipient’s appropriate regulatory agency.

8. REGULATORY MATTERS

The Bank currently has a regulatory agreement with the FDIC that requires us to obtain the consent of the Regional Director of the FDIC and the Commissioner of the KDFI to declare and pay cash dividends.  We also have a regulatory agreement with the FDIC that requires us to maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 8%.  We are currently in compliance with the Tier 1 capital requirement. The Corporation has entered into an agreement with the Federal Reserve.  Under this agreement, we must obtain regulatory approval before declaring any dividends.  We may not redeem shares or obtain additional borrowings without prior approval.

22

Item 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

We operate 22 full-service banking centers and a commercial private banking center in eight contiguous counties in central Kentucky along the Interstate 65 corridor and within the Louisville metropolitan area, including southern Indiana.  Our markets range from Louisville in Jefferson County, Kentucky approximately 40 miles north of our headquarters in Elizabethtown, Kentucky to Hart County, Kentucky, approximately 30 miles south of Elizabethtown to Harrison County, Indiana approximately 60 miles northwest of our headquarters.  Our markets are supported by a diversified industry base and have a regional population of over 1 million.  Louisville and Jefferson County comprise the 29th largest city in the United States.  We operate in Hardin, Nelson, Hart, Bullitt, Meade and Jefferson counties in Kentucky and in Harrison and Floyd counties in southern Indiana.

We serve the needs and cater to the economic strengths of the local communities in which we operate, and we strive to provide a high level of personal and professional customer service. We offer a variety of financial services to our retail and commercial banking customers. These services include personal and corporate banking services and personal investment financial counseling services.

Throughour personal investment financial counseling services, we offer a wide variety of mutual funds, equity investments, and fixed and variable annuities.  We invest in the wholesale capital markets to manage a portfolio of securities and use various forms of wholesale funding. The security portfolio contains a variety of instruments, including callable debentures, taxable and non-taxable debentures, fixed and adjustable rate mortgage backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations.

Our results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from interest-earning assets and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Our operations are also affected by non-interest income, such as service charges, loan fees, gains and losses from the sale of mortgage loans and revenue earned from bank owned life insurance. Our principal operating expenses, aside from interest expense, consist of compensation and employee benefits, occupancy costs, data processing expense, FDIC insurance premiums and provisions for loan losses.

The discussion and analysis section covers material changes in the financial condition since December 31, 2009 and material changes in the results of operations for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2010 as compared to the same periods in 2009.  It should be read in conjunction with "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009.

OVERVIEW

Over the past several years we have focused on enhancing and expanding our retail and commercial banking network in our core central Kentucky markets as well as establishing our presence in the metropolitan Louisville market.  Our core markets, where we have a combined 22% market share, have become increasingly competitive as several new banks have entered those markets during the past few years.  In order to protect and grow our market share, we have replaced existing branches with newer, enhanced facilities.  In addition to the enhancement and expansion in our core markets, we have been increasing our presence in the Louisville market.  Our acquisition of FSB Bancshares, Inc. has broadened our retail branch network in the Louisville MSA, which now extends into southern Indiana.  Approximately 55% of the deposit base in the Louisville market is controlled by five out-of-state banks.  While the market is very competitive, we believe this creates an opportunity for smaller community banks with more power to make decisions locally.  We believe our investment in these initiatives along with our continued commitment to a high level of customer service will enhance our market share in our core markets and our development in the Louisville market.

Our retail branch network continues to generate encouraging results.  Total deposits have grown 57% over the past three years. Total deposits were $1.08 billion at June 30, 2010, an increase of $29.5 million or 3% from December 31, 2009.  After our acquisition of Farmers State Bank in 2008, our retail branch network in the Louisville market has broadened to sixteen offices.  In May 2009, we opened the Fort Knox banking center, our twenty-first banking center, which expanded our current footprint in Hardin County, Kentucky.  The Fort Knox banking center complements our existing branch located in Radcliff, Kentucky and is located just outside the main entrance to the Fort Knox military base.   We also completed the construction of our twenty-second banking center which opened in July 2009. The branch is located in the Middletown area of Louisville, Kentucky.  Competition for deposits continues to be challenging in all of the markets we serve. We believe this intense competition combined with continued re-pricing of variable rate loans could add to additional margin compression.

23

We have developed a strong commercial real estate niche in our markets.  We have an experienced team of bankers who focus on providing service and convenience to our customers.  It is quite common for our bankers to close loans at a customer’s place of business or even the customer’s personal residence.   This high level of service has been well received in our Louisville market, which is dominated by regional banks.  To further develop our commercial banking relationships in Louisville, we opened a private banking office in 2007.  This upscale facility complements our full service centers in Louisville by attracting commercial deposit relationships in conjunction with our commercial lending relationships.

Despite the continued adverse economic conditions during the first half of 2010, the Corporation’s capital position remained well-capitalized as defined by regulatory standards.  Our capital position was further bolstered in the first quarter of 2009 by our participation in the U.S. Treasury Department Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”).  Under the CPP, we sold $20 million of cumulative perpetual preferred shares to the U.S. Treasury in a transaction that closed on January 9, 2009.

We believe that the current adverse economic conditions will be long lasting.  During the last quarter of 2008, the continued economic slowdown moved to sectors not previously impacted, including consumer, commercial, industrial among others.  Credit issues are broadening in these sectors and economic recovery is most likely several quarters away.  We will continue to monitor credit quality very closely in 2010 as this adverse economic climate persists.  As the economy and the financial sector continue to struggle, probable losses in the loan portfolio could increase, resulting in higher provision for loan losses during 2010.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our accounting and reporting policies comply with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and conform to general practices within the banking industry.  The accounting policy relating to the allowance for loan losses is critical to the understanding of our results of operations since the application of this policy requires significant management assumptions and estimates that could result in materially different amounts to be reported if conditions or underlying circumstances were to change.

Allowance for Loan Losses – We maintain an allowance sufficient to absorb probable incurred credit losses existing in the loan portfolio. Our Allowance for Loan Loss Review Committee, which is comprised of senior officers, evaluates the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis.  We estimate the allowance using past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of the underlying collateral, and current economic conditions.  While we estimate the allowance for loan losses based in part on historical losses within each loan category, estimates for losses within the commercial real estate portfolio depend more on credit analysis and recent payment performance. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans or loan categories, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off. 

The allowance consists of specific and general components.  The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired or loans otherwise classified as substandard or doubtful.  The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. Allowance estimates are developed with actual loss experience adjusted for current economic conditions.  Allowance estimates are considered a prudent measurement of the risk in the loan portfolio and are applied to individual loans based on loan type.

Based on our calculation, an allowance of $21.0 millionor 2.23% of total loans was our estimate of probable losses within the loan portfolio as ofJune 30, 2010.This estimate required a provision for loan losses on the income statement of$5.0 million for the 2010 six month period.If the mix and amount of future charge off percentages differ significantly from those assumptions used by management in making its determination, the allowance for loan losses and provision for loan losses on the income statement could materially increase.

Impairment of Investment Securities – We review all unrealized losses on our investment securities to determine whether the losses are other-than-temporary.  We evaluate our investment securities on at least a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant, to determine whether a decline in their value below amortized cost is other-than-temporary.  We evaluate a number of factors including, but not limited to: valuation estimates provided by investment brokers; how much fair value has declined below amortized cost; how long the decline in fair value has existed; the financial condition of the issuer; significant rating agency changes on the issuer; and management’s assessment that we do not intend to sell or will not be required to sell the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

24

The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the possibility for a near-term recovery of value is not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment.  Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the security is written down to fair value and a charge to earnings is recognized for the credit component and the non-credit component is recorded to other comprehensive income.

Real estate owned – The estimation of fair value is significant to real estate owned acquired through foreclosure.  These assets are recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs at the date of foreclosure.  Fair value is based on the appraised market value of the property based on sales of similar assets when available.  The fair value may be subsequently reduced if the estimated fair value declines below the original appraised value.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 was $(62,000) or $(0.07) per common share compared to net income of $715,000 or $0.10 per common share diluted for the same period in 2009. Net income for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 was $693,000 or $.04 per common share diluted compared to $1.5 million or $.21 per common share diluted for the same period a year ago.  Earnings decreased for 2010 compared to 2009 due to a decrease in our net interest margin, an increase in provision for loan loss expense, write downs taken on real estate acquired through foreclosure, and a higher level of non-interest expense. Net income available to common shareholders was also impacted by dividends paid on preferred shares. Our book value per common share decreased from $15.60 at June 30, 2009 to $14.14 at June 30, 2010.Annualized net income for the first six months of 2010 represented a return on average assets of .11% and a return on average equity of 1.62%.These compare with a return on average assets of .18% and a return on average equity of 2.12% for the first six months of 2009 also annualized.

Net Interest Income – The principal source of our revenue is net interest income.  Net interest income is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities and the interest expense on liabilities used to fund those assets, such as interest-bearing deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by both changes in the amount and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as well as changes in market interest rates.

The increase in the volume of interest earning assets and the change in the mix of interest earning assets had a moderate impact on net interest income, which increased $263,000 and $275,000 for the three and six month 2010 periods compared to the same prior year periods.  Average interest earning assets increased $185.4 million for the 2010 quarter and $189.7 million for the six months compared to 2009.  Despite the increase in interest earning assets, our net interest margin realized a sharp decline.  The decline is primarily attributed to our efforts to increase liquidity by placing assets into lower yielding investments other than loans.  The yield on earning assets averaged 5.19% and 5.17% for the three and six month 2010 periods compared to an average yield on earning assets of 5.82% and 5.91% for the same periods in 2009.  This decrease was offset by a decrease in our cost of funds.  Net interest margin as a percent of average earning assets decreased47 basis points to 3.23% for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and 53 basis points to 3.18% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 3.70% and 3.71% for the same periods in 2009.

Our cost of funds averaged 2.12% and 2.15% for the quarter and six month periods of 2010 compared to an average cost of funds of 2.31% and 2.40% for the same period in 2009. Going forward, our cost of funds is expected to continue to decrease as certificates of deposit re-price and roll off into new certificates of deposit at lower interest rates.

Competition for deposits combined with continued re-pricing of variable rate loans and our efforts to increase liquidity by placing assets into lower yielding investments other than loans is likely to compress our net interest margin in future quarters.

25

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET

The following table provides information relating to our average balance sheet and reflects the average yield on assets and average cost of liabilities for the indicated periods.  Yields and costs for the periods presented are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively.

	Quarter Ended June 30,
				2010								2009
(Dollars in thousands)	Average					Average			Average					Average
	Balance			Interest		Yield/Cost (5)			Balance			Interest		Yield/Cost (5)
ASSETS
Interest earning assets:
U.S. Treasury and agencies	$	61,371		$	452		2.95	%	$	8,930		$	63		2.83	%
Mortgage-backed securities		24,785			253		4.09			7,109			74		4.17
Equity securities		500			10		8.02			942			24		10.22
State and political subdivision securities (1)		19,057			306		6.44			11,210			178		6.37
Corporate bonds		1,970			22		4.48			2,873			26		3.63
Loans (2) (3) (4)		964,428			14,267		5.93			967,067			14,155		5.87
FHLB stock		8,515			90		4.24			8,515			91		4.29
Interest bearing deposits		114,036			50		0.18			2,584			27		4.19
Total interest earning assets		1,194,662			15,450		5.19			1,009,230			14,638		5.82
Less:  Allowance for loan losses		(18,703	)							(14,850	)
Non-interest earning assets		85,040								86,652
Total assets	$	1,260,999							$	1,081,032
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest bearing liabilities:
Savings accounts	$	117,309		$	227		0.78	%	$	118,938		$	201		0.68	%
NOW and money market accounts		261,968			725		1.11			161,383			260		0.65
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits		651,933			3,938		2.42			490,522			3,885		3.18
Short term borrowings		744			11		5.93			83,421			47		0.23
FHLB advances		52,607			596		4.54			52,820			600		4.56
Subordinated debentures		18,000			331		7.38			18,000			329		7.33
Total interest bearing liabilities		1,102,561			5,828		2.12			925,084			5,322		2.31
Non-interest bearing liabilities:
Non-interest bearing deposits		67,655								59,396
Other liabilities		3,945								3,194
Total liabilities		1,174,161								987,674
Stockholders' equity		86,838								93,358
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,260,999							$	1,081,032
Net interest income				$	9,622							$	9,316
Net interest spread							3.07	%							3.51	%
Net interest margin							3.23	%							3.70	%

(1) Taxable equivalent yields are calculated assuming a 34% federal income tax rate.

(2) Includes loan fees, immaterial in amount, in both interest income and the calculation of yield on loans.

(3) Calculations include non-accruing loans in the average loan amounts outstanding.

(4) Includes loans held for sale.

(5) Annualized

26

	Six Months Ended June 30,
				2010								2009
(Dollars in thousands)	Average					Average			Average					Average
	Balance			Interest		Yield/Cost (5)			Balance			Interest		Yield/Cost (5)
ASSETS
Interest earning assets:
U.S. Treasury and agencies	$	44,983		$	627		2.81	%	$	5,430		$	102		3.79	%
Mortgage-backed securities		19,544			403		4.16			7,400			156		4.25
Equity securities		665			35		10.61			941			57		12.22
State and political subdivision securities (1)		17,712			565		6.43			10,152			339		6.73
Corporate bonds		1,932			47		4.91			2,718			60		4.45
Loans (2) (3) (4)		976,537			28,314		5.85			953,357			28,099		5.94
FHLB stock		8,515			184		4.36			8,515			187		4.43
Interest bearing deposits		111,048			75		0.14			2,770			51		3.71
Total interest earning assets		1,180,936			30,250		5.17			991,283			29,051		5.91
Less:  Allowance for loan losses		(18,062	)							(14,322	)
Non-interest earning assets		84,304								83,421
Total assets	$	1,247,178							$	1,060,382
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest bearing liabilities:
Savings accounts	$	121,935		$	466		0.77	%	$	115,043		$	398		0.70	%
NOW and money market accounts		257,697			1,499		1.17			159,628			509		0.64
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits		638,750			7,794		2.46			491,127			7,939		3.26
Short term borrowings		832			32		7.76			71,681			90		0.25
FHLB advances		52,648			1,189		4.55			52,712			1,197		4.58
Subordinated debentures		18,000			658		7.37			18,000			658		7.37
Total interest bearing liabilities		1,089,862			11,638		2.15			908,191			10,791		2.40
Non-interest bearing liabilities:
Non-interest bearing deposits		66,866								56,757
Other liabilities		3,961								2,899
Total liabilities		1,160,689								967,847
Stockholders' equity		86,489								92,535
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,247,178							$	1,060,382
Net interest income				$	18,612							$	18,260
Net interest spread							3.02	%							3.51	%
Net interest margin							3.18	%							3.71	%

(1) Taxable equivalent yields are calculated assuming a 34% federal income tax rate.

(2) Includes loan fees, immaterial in amount, in both interest income and the calculation of yield on loans.

(3) Calculations include non-accruing loans in the average loan amounts outstanding.

(4) Includes loans held for sale.

(5) Annualized

27

RATE/VOLUME ANALYSIS

The table below shows changes in interest income and interest expense for the periods indicated.  For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by old volume); (2) changes in volume (change in volume multiplied by old rate); and (3) changes in rate-volume (change in rate multiplied by change in volume).  Changes in rate-volume are proportionately allocated between rate and volume variance.

	Three Months Ended									Six Months Ended
	June 30,									June 30,
	2010 vs. 2009									2010 vs. 2009
	Increase (decrease)									Increase (decrease)
	Due to change in									Due to change in
(Dollars in thousands)							Net									Net
	Rate			Volume			Change			Rate			Volume			Change
Interest income:
U.S. Treasury and agencies	$	3		$	386		$	389		$	(33	)	$	558		$	525
Mortgage-backed securities		(2	)		181			179			(3	)		250			247
Equity securities		(4	)		(10	)		(14	)		(7	)		(15	)		(22	)
State and political subdivision
securities		2			126			128			(16	)		242			226
Corporate bonds		5			(9	)		(4	)		6			(19	)		(13	)
Loans		151			(39	)		112			(461	)		676			215
FHLB stock		(1	)		-			(1	)		(3	)		-			(3	)
Interest bearing deposits		(50	)		73			23			(96	)		120			24
Total interest earning assets		104			708			812			(613	)		1,812			1,199
Interest expense:
Savings accounts		29			(3	)		26			43			25			68
NOW and money market accounts		249			216			465			567			423			990
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits		(1,049	)		1,102			53			(2,209	)		2,064			(145	)
Short term borrowings		55			(91	)		(36	)		116			(174	)		(58	)
FHLB advances		(2	)		(2	)		(4	)		(7	)		(1	)		(8	)
Subordinated debentures		2			-			2			-			-			-
Total interest bearing liabilities		(716	)		1,222			506			(1,490	)		2,337			847
Net change in net interest income	$	820		$	(514	)	$	306		$	877		$	(525	)	$	352

Non-Interest Income and Non-Interest Expense

The following tables compare the components of non-interest income and expenses for the periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.  The tables show the dollar and percentage change from 2009 to 2010.  Below each table is a discussion of significant changes and trends.

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			Change			%
Non-interest income
Customer service fees on deposit accounts	$	1,739		$	1,645		$	94			5.7	%
Gain on sale of mortgage loans		415			355			60			16.9	%
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings		(11	)		(245	)		234			-95.5	%
Loss on sale and write downs of real estate acquired  through foreclosure		(438	)		(233	)		(205	)		88.0	%
Brokerage commissions		107			99			8			8.1	%
Other income		369			469			(100	)		-21.3	%
	$	2,181		$	2,090		$	91			4.4	%

28

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			Change			%
Non-interest income
Customer service fees on deposit accounts	$	3,264		$	3,122		$	142			4.5	%
Gain on sale of mortgage loans		714			532			182			34.2	%
Loss on sale of investments		(23	)		-			(23	)		100.0	%
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings		(183	)		(400	)		217			-54.3	%
Loss on sale and write downs of real estate acquired  through foreclosure		(464	)		(250	)		(214	)		85.6	%
Brokerage commissions		200			192			8			4.2	%
Other income		811			897			(86	)		-9.6	%
	$	4,319		$	4,093		$	226			5.5	%

Growth in customer service fees on deposit accounts, our largest component of non-interest income, is primarily due to growth in customer deposits and overdraft fee income on retail checking accounts for 2010.  We continue to increase our customer base through cross-selling opportunities and marketing initiatives and promotions.  In addition, we continue to emphasize growing our checking account base to better enhance our profitability and franchise value.

We originate qualified VA, KHC, RHC and conventional secondary market loans and sell them into the secondary market with servicing rights released.  Prevailing mortgage interest rates remained at attractive levels during the period helping to contribute to the increase in the volume of loans closed for 2010.

We invest in various types of liquid assets, including United States Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies, obligations of states and political subdivisions, corporate bonds, mutual funds, stocks and others.  During 2010 we recorded a loss on the sale of an equity investment security of $23,000.

We recognized other-than-temporary impairment charges of $183,000 for the expected credit loss during the 2010 period on three of our trust preferred securities compared to $400,000 of impairment charges for 2009. Management believes this impairment was primarily attributable to the current economic environment which caused the financial conditions of some of the issuers to deteriorate.

Further reducing non-interest income for 2010 was an increase of $214,000 in losses on the sale and write down of real estate owned properties and decreases in other income due to a decline in fees associated with our mortgage loan operations.

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Change			%
Non-interest expenses
Employee compensation and benefits	$	3,905	$	4,149	$	(244	)		-5.9	%
Office occupancy expense and equipment		768		808		(40	)		-5.0	%
Marketing and advertising		225		245		(20	)		-8.2	%
Outside services and data processing		668		795		(127	)		-16.0	%
Bank franchise tax		566		257		309			120.2	%
FDIC insurance premiums		694		788		(94	)		-11.9	%
Amortization of core deposit intangible		88		101		(13	)		-12.9	%
Other expense		1,720		1,301		419			32.2	%
	$	8,634	$	8,444	$	190			2.3	%

29

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Change			%
Non-interest expenses
Employee compensation and benefits	$	7,995	$	8,151	$	(156	)		-1.9	%
Office occupancy expense and equipment		1,572		1,656		(84	)		-5.1	%
Marketing and advertising		450		510		(60	)		-11.8	%
Outside services and data processing		1,398		1,588		(190	)		-12.0	%
Bank franchise tax		916		521		395			75.8	%
FDIC insurance premiums		1,354		967		387			40.0	%
Amortization of core deposit intangible		152		202		(50	)		-24.8	%
Other expense		3,071		2,632		439			16.7	%
	$	16,908	$	16,227	$	681			4.2	%

Employee compensation and benefits is the largest component of non-interest expense.  Decreases for 2010 were due to reductions in benefits expense.

Office occupancy expense and equipment, marketing and advertising, outside services and data processing all decreased in 2010 compared to 2009. These expenses were higher in 2009 due to additional operating expenses related to the opening of two new banking centers. We opened a full-service banking center at Fort Knox and another in the Middletown area of Jefferson County in 2009.

During the fourth quarter of 2009, the FDIC adopted a requirement that all banks prepay three and a quarter years worth of FDIC assessments on December 31, 2009.  The prepayment is based on average third quarter deposits.  The prepaid amount will be amortized over the prepayment period.  Our prepayment was $7.5 million of which $1.3 million was reflected in our 2010 income statement.  Given the enacted increases in assessments  for  insured  financial  institutions  in  2009,  we anticipate  that  FDIC  assessments  on deposits will have a significantly greater impact upon operating expenses for the next few years.

The increase in other expense for 2010 was due to $375,000 in back taxes being paid on a commercial real estate property that was taken into other real estate owned during the period.

Our efficiency ratio was 74% for 2010 compared to 73% for the 2009 period.

ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

Total assets at June 30, 2010 increased $29.7 million from December 31, 2009. The increase was due to building our investment portfolio to $145.1 million, an increase of $98.2 million since December 31, 2009.  This increase was mainly off-set by a decline in gross loans of $54.3 million and a decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $23.8 million.  This shift in the balance sheet reflects a conscious effort by management to add on-balance sheet liquidity to protect us against any adverse changes to our current wholesale funding position.

Loans

Net loans decreased $50.7 million to $934.7 million at June 30, 2010 compared to $985.4 million at December 31, 2009.  Our commercial real estate and commercial portfolios decreased $45.7 million to $645.0 million at June 30, 2010.  Our residential mortgage loan, real estate construction and indirect consumer portfolios all decreased for the 2010 period while our consumer and home equity loan portfolio remained relatively constant.  The decline in our commercial real estate and commercial loan portfolios is a result of pay-offs on several large commercial relationships.  Although there remains a high demand for loans from quality borrowers, we have elected to shift our focus to preserve capital during the current economic slow-down.  We believe however, we will still be well positioned to benefit from growth in our local markets when the economy rebounds.

30

	June 30,			December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010			2009
Commercial	$	53,470		$	62,940
Real estate commercial		591,556			627,788
Real estate construction		12,982			14,567
Residential mortgage		174,306			178,985
Consumer and home equity		75,818			74,844
Indirect consumer		33,087			36,628
Loans held for sale		14,997			8,183
		956,216			1,003,935
Less:
Net deferred loan origination fees		(588	)		(826	)
Allowance for loan losses		(20,953	)		(17,719	)
		(21,541	)		(18,545	)
Loans Receivable	$	934,675		$	985,390

Allowance and Provision for Loan Losses

Our financial performance depends on the quality of the loans we originate and management’s ability to assess the degree of risk in existing loans when it determines the allowance for loan losses.  An increase in loan charge-offs or non-performing loans or an inadequate allowance for loan losses could reduce net interest income, net income and capital and limit the range of products and services we can offer.

The Allowance for Loan Loss Review Committee evaluates the allowance for loan losses quarterly to maintain a level sufficient to absorb probable incurred credit losses existing in the loan portfolio.  Periodic provisions to the allowance are made as needed.  The Committee determines the allowance by applying loss estimates to graded loans by categories, as described below.  In addition, the Committee analyzes such factors as changes in lending policies and procedures; underwriting standards; collection; charge-off and recovery history; changes in national and local economic business conditions and developments; changes in the characteristics of the portfolio; ability and depth of lending management and staff; changes in the trend of the volume and severity of past due, non-accrual and classified loans; troubled debt restructuring and other loan modifications; and results of regulatory examinations.

2008 was a tumultuous year for the U.S. economy and the financial service industry. Declining property values led to declining valuations for loan portfolios.  The property value declines, which began in the second half of 2007, continued throughout 2009.  The markets we serve have generally avoided the severe property value declines experienced in other parts of the country; nonetheless, the impact in our markets was still significant.  During the second half of 2008, throughout 2009 and continuing into the first half of 2010, we substantially increased our provision for loan losses for our general and specific reserves as we identified adverse developments.  2010 will continue to be a challenging time for our financial institution as we manage the overall level of our credit quality.  It is likely that provision for loan losses will remain elevated in the near term.

31

The following table analyzes our loan loss experience for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		2010			2009
Balance at beginning of period	$	18,810	$	15,072	$	17,719		$	13,565
Loans charged-off:
Real estate mortgage		1,040		41		1,583			41
Consumer		153		170		321			486
Commercial		-		2,602		-			2,879
Total charge-offs		1,193		2,813		1,904			3,406
Recoveries:
Real estate mortgage		-		-		-			2
Consumer		53		64		97			117
Commercial		9		-		15			-
Total recoveries		62		64		112			119
Net loans charged-off		1,131		2,749		1,792			3,287
Provision for loan losses		3,274		1,913		5,026			3,958
Balance at end of period	$	20,953	$	14,236	$	20,953		$	14,236
Allowance for loan losses to total loans (excluding loans held for sale)						2.23	%		1.46	%
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans outstanding						0.37	%		0.70	%
Allowance for loan losses to total non-performing loans						57	%		54	%

The provision for loan losses increased $1.4 million to $3.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, and increased $1.1 million to $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same periods in 2009.  During the first half of 2010, we continued our efforts to ensure the adequacy of the allowance by adding specific reserves to several large commercial real estate relationships based on updated appraisals of the underlying collateral.  Offsetting this increase was a small decrease in the general reserve provisioning levels due to the decline in the loan portfolio.  The allowance for loan losses increased $6.7 million to $21.0 million from June 30, 2009 to June 30, 2010. The increase was due to specific reserves placed on loans due to updated appraisal information, as well as the provision recorded to reflect an increase in classified loans for the 2010 period

Federal regulations require banks to classify their own assets on a regular basis.  The regulations provide for three categories of classified loans — substandard, doubtful and loss.

The following table provides information with respect to classified loans as of the dates indicated:

	June 30,		March 31,		December 31,		June 30,		June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010		2010		2009		2009		2008
Classified Loans
Substandard	$	74,305	$	65,028	$	65,408	$	63,134	$	35,746
Doubtful		463		407		370		1,039		-
Loss		231		26		1,178		305		52
Total Classified	$	74,999	$	65,461	$	66,956	$	64,478	$	35,798

32

As we focused on credit quality during 2008, 2009 and the first half of 2010, there was a significant migration of loans into the Substandard loan category.  If economic conditions continue to put stress on our borrowers going forward, this may require higher provisions for loan losses in future periods.  We expect that the economy will remain weak at least for the next several quarters.  Credit quality will continue to be a primary focus in 2010 and going forward.

The $11.2 million increase in substandard assets for 2010 was primarily the resultof downgrading loans withten borrowers with balances ranging from $939,000 million to $8.6 million.Offsetting this increase was the transfer of three classified loans totaling $7.4 million to real estate acquired through foreclosure and the upgrades of four classified loans totaling $10.5 million whose cash flow is adequate to service the debt. Approximately $47.9 million of the total classified loans were related to real estate development or real estate construction loans in our market area.  Classified consumer loans totaled $1.4 million, classified mortgage loans totaled $5.0 million andclassified commercial loans totaled $20.7 million.  For more information on collection efforts, evaluation of collateral and how loss amounts are estimated, see “Non-Performing Assets,” below.

Although we may allocate a portion of the allowance to specific loans or loan categories, the entire allowance is available for active charge-offs.  We develop our allowance estimates based on actual loss experience adjusted for current economic conditions.  Allowance estimates represent a prudent measurement of the risk in the loan portfolio, which we apply to individual loans based on loan type.

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets consist of certain restructured loans for which interest rate or other terms have been renegotiated, loans on which interest is no longer accrued, real estate acquired through foreclosure and repossessed assets.   We do not have any loans longer than 90 days past due still on accrual.  Loans, including impaired loans, are placed on non-accrual status when they become past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest, unless they are adequately secured and in the process of collection.  Loans are considered impaired when we no longer anticipate full principal or interest payments in accordance with the contractual loan terms.  If a loan is impaired, we allocate a portion of the allowance so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate, or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from collateral.

We review our loans on a regular basis and implement normal collection procedures when a borrower fails to make a required payment on a loan.  If the delinquency on a mortgage loan exceeds 90 days and is not cured through normal collection procedures or an acceptable arrangement is not worked out with the borrower, we institute measures to remedy the default, including commencing a foreclosure action.  We generally charge off consumer loans when management deems a loan uncollectible and any available collateral has been liquidated.  We handle commercial business and real estate loan delinquencies on an individual basis with the advice of legal counsel.

We recognize interest income on loans on the accrual basis except for those loans in a non-accrual of income status. We discontinue accruing interest on impaired loans when management believes, after consideration of economic and business conditions and collection efforts that the borrowers’ financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful, typically after the loan becomes 90 days delinquent.  When we discontinue interest accrual, we reverse existing accrued interest and subsequently recognize interest income only to the extent we receive cash payments.

We classify real estate acquired as a result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure as real estate owned until such time as it is sold. We classify new and used automobile, motorcycle and all terrain vehicles acquired as a result of foreclosure as repossessed assets until they are sold. When such property is acquired we record it at the lower of the unpaid principal balance of the related loan or its fair market value.  We charge any write-down of the property at the time of acquisition to the allowance for loan losses.  Subsequent gains and losses are included in non-interest income and non-interest expense.

Real estate owned acquired through foreclosure is recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs at the date of foreclosure.  Fair value is based on the appraised market value of the property based on sales of similar assets.  The fair value may be subsequently reduced if the estimated fair value declines below the original appraised value. Real estate acquired through foreclosure increased $6.3 million to $14.7 million at June 30, 2010.  The increase was primarily the result of foreclosures involving four commercial credit relationships totaling $6.6 million that was transferred during the first half of 2010.

33

The following table provides information with respect to non-performing assets for the periods indicated.

	June 30,			December 31,
(Dollar in thousands)	2010			2009
Restructured	$	1,321		$	9,812
Past due 90 days still on accrual		-			-
Loans on non-accrual status		35,707			28,186
Total non-performing loans		37,028			37,998
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		14,703			8,428
Other repossessed assets		151			103
Total non-performing assets	$	51,882		$	46,529
Interest income that would have been earned
on non-performing loans	$	2,166		$	2,234
Interest income recognized on non-performing
loans		265			211
Ratios:   Non-performing loans to total loans (excluding loans held for sale)		3.94	%		3.82	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		4.18	%		3.85	%

Non-performing loans decreased $970,000 to $37.0 million at June 30, 2010 compared to $38.0 million at December 31, 2009.  Non-accrual loans increased due to the addition of five credit relationships totaling $19.5 million.  Offsetting this increase was a $5.1 credit relationship being removed from the non-accrual category when the loan was re-written with new guarantors and three non-accrual relationships totaling $6.6 million were transferred to real estate acquired through foreclosure.  These credit relationships are secured by real estate and we have provided adequate allowance based on current information.  All non-performing loans are considered impaired.

Non-performing assets for the 2010 period include $1.3 million in restructured commercial, mortgage and consumer loans.  Our restructured loans primarily consist of six credit relationships with balances ranging from $113,000 to $238,000.  The terms of these loans have been renegotiated to reduce the rate of interest or extend the term, thus reducing the amount of cash flow required from the borrower to service the loans. The borrowers are currently meeting the terms of the restructured loans.  The decrease in restructured loans from December 31, 2009 is due to a credit relationship totaling $6.1 million that was transferred to non-accrual status. Additional decreases include the removal of two credit relationships totaling $3.2 million from the restructured category since the terms of the loans are now substantially equivalent to terms on which loans with comparable risks are being made and the borrowers have performed according to the terms of the contract for the past 18 to 24 months.

Investment Securities

Interest on securities provides us our largest source of interest income after interest on loans, constituting 5.8% of the total interest income for the six month period ended June 30, 2010.  The securities portfolio serves as a source of liquidity and earnings and contributes to the management of interest rate risk.  We have the authority to invest in various types of liquid assets, including short-term United States Treasury obligations and securities of various federal agencies, obligations of states and political subdivisions, corporate bonds, certificates of deposit at insured savings and loans and banks, bankers' acceptances, and federal funds.  We may also invest a portion of our assets in certain commercial paper and corporate debt securities.  We are also authorized to invest in mutual funds and stocks whose assets conform to the investments that we are authorized to make directly. The available-for-sale investment portfolio increased $99.0 million due to our purchase of government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Government agency securities and state and municipal obligations. The held-to-maturity investment portfolio decreased $789,000 as securities were called for redemption in accordance with their terms due to decreasing rates.

We review all unrealized losses at least on a quarterly basis to determine whether the losses are other than temporary and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant. We consider the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and whether management has the intent to sell the debt security or whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery.  In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, we may consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition.

34

The unrealized losses on the state and municipal securities were caused primarily by interest rate decreases.  The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment.  Because we do not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that we will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, we do not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2010.  We also considered the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer and identified no matters that would indicate less than full recovery.

We have evaluated the decline in the fair value of the trust preferred securities we hold, which are directly related to the credit and liquidity crisis being experienced in the financial services industry over the past year.   The trust preferred securities market is currently inactive making the valuation of trust preferred securities very difficult.  The trust preferred securities are valued by management using unobservable inputs through a discounted cash flow analysis as permitted under current accounting guidance and using the expected cash flows appropriately discounted using present value techniques.   Refer to Note 6 – Fair Value for more information.

We recognized other-than-temporary impairment charges of $183,000 for the expected credit loss during the 2010 period on three of the trust preferred securities we hold with an original cost basis of $1.8 million.  All of our trust preferred securities are currently rated below investment grade. One of our trust preferred securities continues to pay interest as scheduled through June 30, 2010, and is expected to continue paying interest as scheduled.  The other four trust preferred securities are paying either partial or full interest in kind instead of full cash interest.    See Note 2 – Securities for more information.  Management will continue to evaluate these securities for impairment quarterly. 

Recent accounting guidance requires entities to split other than temporarily impaired charges between credit losses (i.e., the loss based on the entity’s estimate of the decrease in cash flows, including those that result from expected voluntary prepayments), which are charged to earnings, and the remainder of the impairment charge (non-credit component) to accumulated other comprehensive income. This requirement pertains to both securities held to maturity and securities available for sale.

Deposits

We rely primarily on providing excellent customer service and long-standing relationships with customers to attract and retain deposits. Market interest rates and rates on deposit products offered by competing financial institutions can significantly affect our ability to attract and retain deposits.  We attract both short-term and long-term deposits from the general public by offering a wide range of deposit accounts and interest rates. In recent years market conditions have caused us to rely increasingly on short-term certificate accounts and other deposit alternatives that are more responsive to market interest rates.  We use forecasts based on interest rate risk simulations to assist management in monitoring our use of certificates of deposit and other deposit products as funding sources and the impact of the use of those products on interest income and net interest margin in various rate environments.

Total deposits increased $29.5 million year to date compared to December 31, 2009 due to successful deposit promotions.  Retail and commercial deposits increased $115.5 million.  Public funds, brokered deposits and Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”) certificates decreased$86.0 million.  Brokered deposits were $88.7 million at June 30, 2010 compared to $127.8 million at December 31, 2009.

The following table breaks down our deposits.

	June 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(In Thousands)
Non-interest bearing	$	70,204	$	63,950
NOW demand		111,909		117,319
Savings		103,943		131,401
Money market		137,576		127,885
Certificates of deposit		655,653		609,260
	$	1,079,285	$	1,049,815

35

Short-Term Borrowings

Short-term borrowings consist of a loan agreement with a correspondent bank for 2010 and primarily federal funds purchased from the FHLB of Cincinnati for 2009.  We had short-term borrowings of $595,000 at June 30, 2010 and $114.6 million at June 30, 2009.  These borrowings averaged a rate of 7.76% and .25% for 2010 and 2009.

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

Deposits are the primary source of funds for our lending and investment activities and for our general business purposes.  We can also use advances (borrowings) from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Cincinnati to compensate for reductions in deposits or deposit inflows at less than projected levels.  Advances from the FHLB are secured by our stock in the FHLB, certain securities, certain commercial real estate loans and substantially all of our first mortgage, multi-family and open end home equity loans.  At June 30, 2010 we had $52.6 million in advances outstanding from the FHLB.

Subordinated Debentures

In 2008, First Federal Statutory Trust III, an unconsolidated trust subsidiary of First Financial Service Corporation, issued $8.0 million in trust preferred securities.  The trust loaned the proceeds of the offering to us in exchange for junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures which we used to finance the purchase of FSB Bancshares, Inc. The subordinated debentures, which mature on June 24, 2038, can be called at par in whole or in part on or after June 24, 2018. The subordinated debentures pay a fixed rate of 8% for thirty years.  We have the option to defer interest payments on the subordinated debt from time to time for a period not to exceed five consecutive years.  The subordinated debentures are considered as Tier I capital for the Corporation under current regulatory guidelines.

A different trust subsidiary issued 30 year cumulative trust preferred securities totaling $10 million at a 10 year fixed rate of 6.69% adjusting quarterly thereafter at LIBOR plus 160 basis points.  The subordinated debentures, which mature March 22, 2037, can be called at par in whole or in part on or after March 15, 2017.  We have the option to defer interest payments on the subordinated debt from time to time for a period not to exceed five consecutive years. The subordinated debentures are considered as Tier I capital for the Corporation under current regulatory guidelines.

Our trust subsidiaries loaned the proceeds of their offerings of trust preferred securities to us in exchange for junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures. In accordance with current accounting guidance, these trusts are not consolidated with our financial statements but rather the subordinated debentures are shown as a liability.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity risk arises from the possibility we may not be able to satisfy current or future financial commitments, or may become unduly reliant on alternative funding sources. The objective of liquidity risk management is to ensure that we can meet the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers, as well as our operating cash needs, at a reasonable cost, taking into account all on- and off-balance sheet funding demands. Our investment and funds management policy identifies the primary sources of liquidity, establishes procedures for monitoring and measuring liquidity, and establishes minimum liquidity requirements in compliance with regulatory guidance. The Asset Liability Committee continually monitors our liquidity position.

Our sources of funds include the sale of securities in the available-for-sale portion of the investment portfolio, the payment of principal on loans and mortgage-backed securities, proceeds realized from loans held for sale, brokered deposits and other wholesale funding.  We also secured federal funds borrowing lines from three of our correspondent banks.  Two of the lines are for $15 million each and the other one is for $5 million.  Our banking centers also provide access to retail deposit markets.  If large certificate depositors shift to our competitors or other markets in response to interest rate changes, we have the ability to replenish those deposits through alternative funding sources.  Traditionally, we have also borrowed from the FHLB to supplement our funding requirements.  At June 30, 2010, we did not have sufficient collateral available for additional borrowings from the FHLB.We believe we have the ability to raise deposits, when needed, by offering rates at or slightly above market rates.  If the Bank would fall below well-capitalized status, we would be subject to wholesale funding restrictions as well as interest rate restrictions used to attract core deposits.

36

At the holding company level, the Corporation uses cash to pay dividends to stockholders, repurchase common stock, make selected investments and acquisitions, and service debt. The main sources of funding for the Corporation include dividends from the Bank, borrowings and access to the capital markets.  The Corporation maintains a loan agreement with a correspondent bank.  As of June 30, 2010, the outstanding balance of this loan was $595,000.  The loan matures on January 31, 2011 and principal and interest of $ 86,000 is due monthly at a rate of prime plus one percent with a floor of 6.00%.

The primary source of funding for the Corporation has been dividends and returns of investment from the Bank. Kentucky banking laws limit the amount of dividends that may be paid to the Corporation by the Bank without prior approval of the KDFI.  Under these laws, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year is limited to current year’s net income, as defined in the laws, combined with the retained net income of the preceding two years, less any dividends declared during those periods.The Bank currently has a regulatory agreement with the FDIC that requires us to obtain the consent of the Regional Director of the FDIC and the Commissioner of the KDFI to declare and pay cash dividends.  The Corporation has also entered into an agreement with the Federal Reserve to obtain regulatory approval before declaring any dividends.  We may not redeem shares or obtain additional borrowings without prior approval.  Because of these limitations, consolidated cash flows as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows may not represent cash immediately available to the Corporation.  During 2010, the Bank declared and paid dividends of $1.2 million to the Corporation.

CAPITAL

Stockholders’ equity increased $1.4 million for the period ended June 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009 primarily due to net income earned during the period and the decrease in unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale.  Our average stockholders’ equity to average assets ratio decreased to 6.93% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 8.73% for 2009.

On January 9, 2009, we sold $20 million of cumulative perpetual preferred shares, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “Senior Preferred Shares”) to the U.S. Treasury under the terms of its Capital Purchase Program.  The Senior Preferred Shares constitute Tier 1 capital and rank senior to our common shares.  The Senior Preferred Shares pay cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years and will reset to a rate of 9% per year after five years. The Senior Preferred Shares may be redeemed at any time, at our option.

Under the terms of our CPP stock purchase agreement, we also issued the U.S. Treasury a warrant to purchase an amount of our common stock equal to 15% of the aggregate amount of the Senior Preferred Shares, or $3 million.  The warrant entitles the U.S. Treasury to purchase 215,983 common shares at a purchase price of $13.89 per share.  The initial exercise price for the warrant and the number of shares subject to the warrant were determined by reference to the market price of our common stock calculated on a 20-day trailing average as of December 8, 2008, the date the U.S. Treasury approved our application.  The warrant has a term of 10 years and is potentially dilutive to earnings per share.

During the first six months of 2010, we did not purchase any shares of our own common stock.The terms of our Senior Preferred Shares do not allow us to repurchase shares of our common stock without the consent of the U.S. Treasury until the Senior Preferred Shares are redeemed. Additionally, we currently have a regulatory agreement with the Fedeal Reserve that requires prior written consent before repurchasing shares of common stock.

Each of the federal bank regulatory agencies has established minimum leverage capital requirements for banks. Banks must maintain a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted average quarterly assets ranging from 3% to 5%, subject to federal bank regulatory evaluation of an organization’s overall safety and soundness.  We intend to maintain a capital position that meets or exceeds the “well capitalized” requirements established for banks by the FDIC.  We currently have a regulatory agreement with the FDIC that requires us to maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 8%.  We are currently in compliance with the Tier 1 capital requirement.

37

The following table shows the ratios of Tier 1 capital and total capital to risk-adjusted assets and the leverage ratios for the Corporation and the Bank as of June 30, 2010.

											To Be Considered
											Well Capitalized
											Under Prompt
(Dollars in thousands)						For Capital					Correction
	Actual					Adequacy Purposes					Action Provisions
As of June 30, 2010:	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Consolidated	$	115,662		11.86	%	$	78,024		8.00	%		N/A		N/A
Bank		114,800		11.78			77,977		8.00			97,472		10.00
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Consolidated		103,363		10.60			39,012		4.00			N/A		N/A
Bank		102,508		10.52			38,989		4.00			58,483		6.00
Tier I capital (to average assets)
Consolidated		103,363		8.20			50,394		4.00			N/A		N/A
Bank		102,508		8.13			50,404		4.00			63,005		5.00

											To Be Considered
											Well Capitalized
											Under Prompt
(Dollars in thousands)						For Capital					Correction
	Actual					Adequacy Purposes					Action Provisions
As of December 31, 2009:	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Consolidated	$	115,702		11.35	%	$	81,550		8.00	%		N/A		N/A
Bank		114,514		11.25			81,467		8.00			101,834		10.00
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Consolidated		102,894		10.09			40,775		4.00			N/A		N/A
Bank		101,719		9.99			40,734		4.00			61,100		6.00
Tier I capital (to average assets)
Consolidated		102,894		8.66			47,533		4.00			N/A		N/A
Bank		101,719		8.90			45,732		4.00			57,165		5.00

Item 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk

To minimize the volatility of net interest income and exposure to economic loss that may result from fluctuating interest rates, we manage our exposure to adverse changes in interest rates through asset and liability management activities within guidelines established by our Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”).  The ALCO, comprised of senior management representatives, has the responsibility for approving and ensuring compliance with asset/liability management policies.  Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in the net interest income as a result of market fluctuations in interest rates.  The ALCO, on an ongoing basis, monitors interest rate and liquidity risk in order to implement appropriate funding and balance sheet strategies.  Management considers interest rate risk to be our most significant market risk.

We utilize an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity.  We then evaluate potential changes in market interest rates and their subsequent effects on net interest income.  The model projects the effect of instantaneous movements in interest rates of both 100 and 200 basis points.  We also incorporate assumptions based on the historical behavior of our deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates into the model.  These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure future net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income.  Actual results will differ from the model’s simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and the application and timing of various management strategies.

38

Our interest sensitivity profile was asset sensitive at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.  Given a sustained 100 basis point decrease in rates, our base net interest income would decrease by an estimated.76% at June 30, 2010 compared to a decrease of 2.84% at December 31, 2009. Given a 100 basis point increase in interest rates our base net interest income would increase by anestimated 1.93% at June 30, 2010 compared to an increase of 2.70% at December 31, 2009.

We use various asset/liability strategies to manage the re-pricing characteristics of our assets and liabilities designed to ensure that exposure to interest rate fluctuations is limited within our guidelines of acceptable levels of risk-taking.  As demonstrated by the June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 sensitivity tables, our balance sheet has an asset sensitive position. This means that our earning assets, which consist of loans and investment securities, will change in price at a faster rate than our deposits and borrowings.  Therefore, if short term interest rates increase, our net interest income will increase.  Likewise, if short term interest rates decrease, our net interest income will decrease.

Our sensitivity to interest rate changes is presented based on data as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 annualized to a one year period.

	June 30, 2010
	Decrease in Rates								Increase in Rates
	200			100					100			200
(Dollars in thousands)	Basis Points			Basis Points			Base		Basis Points			Basis Points
Projected interest income
Loans	$	51,271		$	52,257		$	53,236	$	54,240		$	55,218
Investments		5,375			5,510			5,378		5,923			6,456
Total interest income		56,646			57,767			58,613		60,162			61,674
Projected interest expense
Deposits		18,202			18,146			18,719		19,553			20,388
Borrowed funds		3,672			3,672			3,672		3,687			3,701
Total interest expense		21,874			21,818			22,391		23,240			24,089
Net interest income	$	34,772		$	35,949		$	36,223	$	36,922		$	37,585
Change from base	$	(1,451	)	$	(274	)			$	699		$	1,362
% Change from base		(4.01	)%		(0.76	)%				1.93	%		3.76	%

	December 31, 2009
	Decrease in Rates								Increase in Rates
	200			100					100			200
(Dollars in thousands)	Basis Points			Basis Points			Base		Basis Points			Basis Points
Projected interest income
Loans	$	55,484		$	56,942		$	58,564	$	60,162		$	61,850
Investments		2,271			2,116			2,150		2,552			2,953
Total interest income		57,755			59,058			60,714		62,714			64,803
Projected interest expense
Deposits		15,938			16,077			16,587		16,920			18,043
Borrowed funds		3,753			3,753			3,752		4,329			4,905
Total interest expense		19,691			19,830			20,339		21,249			22,948
Net interest income	$	38,064		$	39,228		$	40,375	$	41,465		$	41,855
Change from base	$	(2,311	)	$	(1,147	)			$	1,090		$	1,480
% Change from base		(5.72	)%		(2.84	)%				2.70	%		3.67	%

39

Item 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As of June 30, 2010, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2010 were effective in ensuring material information required to be disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10-Q was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported in a timely manner as specified in SEC rules and forms.

There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls after the date of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers evaluation, nor were there any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the controls which required corrective action.

Part II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Although, from time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings in the normal course of business, there are no material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party, or to which any of our property is subject.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Information regarding risks that could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results appear in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 under Item 1A – Risk Factors.  In addition, you should carefully consider the following supplemental risk factor.

The risks identified in our risk factors are not the only risks we face.  Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we have deemed to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or operating results.

Future sales of stock could dilute our equity, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

From time to time, we evaluate raising capital through the sale of securities.  We are not restricted from issuing additional common stock, including securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock.  The issuance of additional shares of common stock or the issuance of convertible securities would dilute the ownership interest of our existing common shareholders. The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of such an offering as well as other sales of a large block of shares of our common stock or similar securities in the market after an offering, or the perception that such sales could occur.

The impact of financial reform legislation on us is uncertain.

The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act institutes a wide range of reforms that will have an impact on all financial institutions.  Changes to the deposit insurance and financial regulatory systems, enhanced bank capital requirements and new regulations designed to protect consumers in financial transactions are only a few of the provisions of the Act.  Many of these provisions are subject to rule making procedures and studies that will be conducted in the future.  Accordingly, we cannot assess the impact the Act will have on us at the present time.

40

In the future, we may have to suspend payment of dividends on the outstanding shares of preferred stock issued to the United States Department of the Treasury.

In January 2009, we issued $20 million in preferred stock to the United States Department of the Treasury as part of Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program. The preferred stock accrues cumulative dividends quarterly at a rate of 5% per annum during the first five years (approximately $1 million annually), and 9% per annum thereafter (approximately $1.8 million annually). If we fail to pay dividends on the preferred stock for six or more dividend periods, the holders of the preferred stock will have the right to elect two directors to fill two newly created directorships. This right and the terms of the new directorships will continue until such time as we have paid in full all accrued and unpaid dividends on the preferred stock for all past dividend periods. In addition, all accrued but unpaid amounts will accumulate as a liability on our balance sheet.

In the future, we may have to defer payments on our trust preferred securities.

We may defer interest payments on our trust preferred securities for a total of 20 consecutive calendar quarters without causing an event of default under the documents governing these securities. After such period, we must pay all deferred interest and resume quarterly interest payments or we will be in default. If we defer payments on our trust preferred securities, all accrued but unpaid amounts will accumulate as a liability on our balance sheet.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Securities and Use of Proceeds

We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not Applicable

Item 4. Reserved

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits:

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act

32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

41

FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICE CORPORATION

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  August 9, 2010	By:  /s/	B. Keith Johnson
		B. Keith Johnson
		Chief Executive Officer
Date:  August 9, 2010	By:  /s/	Steven M. Zagar
		Steven M. Zagar
		Chief Financial Officer &
		Principal Accounting Officer

42

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.	Description
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

43