UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended: December 30, 2000
Commission File Number: 0-18059
Parametric Technology Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | 04-2866152 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) | |
140 Kendrick Street, Needham, MA 02494
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(781) 370-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨
There were 265,797,156 shares of our common stock outstanding on December 30, 2000.
PARAMETRIC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended December 30, 2000
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PARAMETRIC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands)
| | September 30, 2000
| | December 30, 2000
|
---|
ASSETS | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ 325,872 | | | $ 236,226 | |
Short-term investments | | 22,969 | | | 28,566 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6,270 and $5,726 | | 183,804 | | | 187,546 | |
Other current assets | | 95,788 | | | 98,037 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Total current assets | | 628,433 | | | 550,375 | |
|
Marketable investments | | 26,300 | | | 27,066 | |
Property and equipment, net | | 66,879 | | | 77,579 | |
Goodwill, net | | 88,034 | | | 82,004 | |
Other intangible assets, net | | 43,645 | | | 40,428 | |
Other assets | | 71,592 | | | 73,184 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Total assets | | $ 924,883 | | | $ 850,636 | |
| |
| | |
| |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ 30,944 | | | $ 26,187 | |
Accrued expenses | | 46,200 | | | 43,919 | |
Accrued compensation | | 52,112 | | | 45,432 | |
Deferred revenue | | 231,495 | | | 206,576 | |
Income taxes | | 1,601 | | | 3,298 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Total current liabilities | | 362,352 | | | 325,412 | |
|
Other liabilities | | 33,989 | | | 30,643 | |
|
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; none issued | | — | | | — | |
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 500,000 shares authorized; 276,053 shares issued | | 2,761 | | | 2,761 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | 1,641,513 | | | 1,641,741 | |
Treasury stock, at cost, 6,456 and 10,259 shares, respectively | | (66,647 | ) | | (111,950 | ) |
Accumulated deficit | | (1,036,456 | ) | | (1,024,165 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (12,629 | ) | | (13,806 | ) |
| |
| | |
| |
Total stockholders’ equity | | 528,542 | | | 494,581 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ 924,883 | | | $ 850,636 | |
| |
| | |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
PARAMETRIC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share data)
| | Three months ended
|
---|
| | January 1, 2000
| | December 30, 2000
|
---|
Revenue: | | | | |
License | | $ 104,874 | | $ 101,300 |
Service | | 134,163 | | 133,644 |
| |
| |
|
Total revenue | | 239,037 | | 234,944 |
| |
| |
|
Costs and expenses: | | | | |
Cost of license revenue | | 4,128 | | 3,807 |
Cost of service revenue | | 56,027 | | 58,582 |
Sales and marketing | | 104,940 | | 92,433 |
Research and development | | 34,067 | | 35,809 |
General and administrative | | 16,471 | | 18,873 |
Amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets | | 9,428 | | 9,439 |
| |
| |
|
Total costs and expenses | | 225,061 | | 218,943 |
| |
| |
|
|
Operating income | | 13,976 | | 16,001 |
Other income, net | | 643 | | 1,256 |
| |
| |
|
Income before income taxes | | 14,619 | | 17,257 |
Provision for income taxes | | 4,238 | | 5,003 |
| |
| |
|
Net income | | $ 10,381 | | $ 12,254 |
| |
| |
|
Earnings per share (Note 2): | | | | |
Basic | | $ 0.04 | | $ 0.05 |
Diluted | | $ 0.04 | | $ 0.05 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
PARAMETRIC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
| | Three months ended
|
---|
| | January 1, 2000
| | December 30, 2000
|
---|
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ 10,381 | | | $ 12,254 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 18,185 | | | 18,881 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash, net of effects of purchased businesses: | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | 32,549 | | | (3,742 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | (17,300 | ) | | (1,410 | ) |
Accrued compensation | | (10,353 | ) | | (8,080 | ) |
Deferred revenue | | (4,120 | ) | | (24,919 | ) |
Income taxes | | (24,559 | ) | | 1,777 | |
Other current assets | | (3,428 | ) | | (8,303 | ) |
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities | | 683 | | | (2,861 | ) |
| |
| | |
| |
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities | | 2,038 | | | (16,403 | ) |
| |
| | |
| |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | |
Additions to property and equipment | | (10,782 | ) | | (19,454 | ) |
Additions to other intangible assets | | — | | | (238 | ) |
Acquisitions of businesses | | (7,922 | ) | | — | |
Construction in progress | | (4,106 | ) | | — | |
Proceeds from sale of construction in progress | | 30,836 | | | — | |
Purchases of investments | | (11,831 | ) | | (7,190 | ) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments | | 20,857 | | | 952 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities | | 17,052 | | | (25,930 | ) |
| |
| | |
| |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | 53,845 | | | 1,767 | |
Purchases of treasury stock | | — | | | (46,846 | ) |
| |
| | |
| |
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities | | 53,845 | | | (45,079 | ) |
| |
| | |
| |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | 2,627 | | | (2,234 | ) |
| |
| | |
| |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | 75,562 | | | (89,646 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | 239,789 | | | 325,872 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $315,351 | | | $236,226 | |
| |
| | |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
PARAMETRIC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
| | Three months ended
|
---|
| | January 1, 2000
| | December 30, 2000
|
---|
Net income | | $10,381 | | | $12,254 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax provision (benefit): | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $1,205, and $(872), respectively | | 2,239 | | | (1,618) | |
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities and derivatives, net of tax of $0, and $238, respectively | | (3 | ) | | 441 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | 2,236 | | | (1,177 | ) |
| |
| | |
| |
Comprehensive income | | $12,617 | | | $11,077 | |
| |
| | |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
PARAMETRIC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Parametric Technology Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries and have been prepared by us in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our fiscal year end is September 30. The year end consolidated balance sheet was derived from our audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of those of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the periods indicated. While we believe that the disclosures presented are adequate to make the information not misleading, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000.
The results of operations for the three months ended December 30, 2000 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the remainder of the fiscal year.
2. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding stock options using the “treasury stock” method. The following table presents the calculation for both basic and diluted EPS:
| | Three months ended
|
---|
| | January 1, 2000
| | December 30, 2000
|
---|
Net income | | $ 10,381 | | $ 12,254 |
| |
| |
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding | | 272,436 | | 267,034 |
Dilutive effect of employee stock options | | 14,434 | | 3,382 |
| |
| |
|
Diluted shares outstanding | | 286,870 | | 270,416 |
| |
| |
|
|
Basic EPS | | $ 0.04 | | $ 0.05 |
Diluted EPS | | $ 0.04 | | $ 0.05 |
Options to purchase 5.4 million and 39.4 million shares for the first quarter of fiscal 2000 and 2001, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the computations of diluted EPS because the price of the options was greater than the average market price of the common stock for the period reported.
3. Facilities
In December 1999, we sold land and certain improvements under construction for $30.8 million and entered into an operating lease covering approximately 381,000 square feet of office space in Needham, MA that will allow us to consolidate and replace our Waltham, MA operations. Our corporate offices currently occupy 210,000 square feet in the new Needham facility and we expect to occupy the remaining 171,000 square feet in the second quarter of fiscal 2001, subject to completion of construction. Occupancy and rent began in December 2000. The lease expires in December 2012, subject to certain renewal rights. During the first quarter of 2001 we had capital expenditures of approximately $14.0 million primarily for tenant improvements and furniture and fixtures related to the new facility.
PARAMETRIC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
4. Derivatives
We adopted SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,in the first quarter of 2001. We use derivatives to hedge foreign currency cash flows on a continuing basis for periods consistent with our net asset and forecasted exposures. We use foreign currency forward and option contracts to hedge a portion of our forecasted transactions. Changes in their fair value are carried in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the underlying forecasted transaction occurs. We recorded expenses of approximately $1.5 million from option contracts in the first quarter of 2001. The amount that will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings over the next nine months is a gain of approximately $435,000. Our derivative contracts generally mature within nine months.
5. New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 101,Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,which provides guidance related to revenue recognition based on interpretations and practices followed by the SEC. SAB 101 is effective for the fourth quarter of our fiscal 2001. We do not expect the implementation of SAB 101 to have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No. 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.SFAS No. 140 provides accounting and reporting standards for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities. SFAS No. 140 replaces SFAS No. 125 but it carries over most of SFAS No. 125’s provisions. The statement is effective for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities occurring after March 31, 2001. We believe the adoption of this statement will not have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements.
6. Segment Information
We operate within a single industry segment—computer software and related services. We have two major product categories within that one segment: (1) our computer aided design, manufacturing and engineering (MCAD) solutions including our flagship Pro/ENGINEER® design software, which provides flexible engineering solutions to our customers and (2) our Web-based Windchill® software which provides collaborative information management solutions to our customers using Internet technologies. These collaborative product commerce (CPC) solutions permit customers to collaboratively develop, build and manage products throughout their entire lifecycle. Our products are sold worldwide by our sales force and distributors.
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating decision-making group is our executive officers. Our executive officers make financial decisions and resource allocations based on our product segments.
PARAMETRIC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Our financial reporting focuses on the revenues and operating income (loss) for our MCAD solutions and Windchill solutions product segments. We do not allocate nondirect sales, marketing or administrative expenses to our product segments, as management does not use this information to measure their performance. The revenue and operating income (loss) attributable to these product segments are included below:
| | Three months ended
|
---|
| | January 1, 2000
| | December 30, 2000
|
---|
Revenue: |
MCAD solutions: | | | | | | |
License revenue | | $ 82,204 | | | $ 77,436 | |
Service revenue | | 118,580 | | | 107,118 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Total MCAD solutions revenue | | $200,784 | | | $184,554 | |
| |
Windchill solutions: | | | | | | |
License revenue | | $ 22,669 | | | $ 23,863 | |
Service revenue | | 15,584 | | | 26,527 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Total Windchill solutions revenue | | 38,253 | | | 50,390 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Total revenue | | $239,037 | | | $234,944 | |
| |
| | |
| |
|
Operating income (loss): (1) | | | | | | |
MCAD solutions | | $127,988 | | | $121,095 | |
Windchill solutions | | 4,096 | | | 76 | |
Distribution Expenses (2) | | (102,293 | ) | | (88,780 | ) |
| |
| | |
| |
Product segment operating income | | $ 29,791 | | | $ 32,391 | |
Unallocated expenses (3) | | (15,815 | ) | | (16,390 | ) |
| |
| | |
| |
Total operating income | | $ 13,976 | | | $ 16,001 | |
| |
| | |
| |
(1) The product segment operating income (loss) reflects only the direct controllable expenses of each product segment. The operating income (loss) reported does not represent the total operating results for each product segment as it does not contain an allocation of certain nondirect sales, marketing, corporate and general administrative expenses incurred in support of the product segment.
(2) Distribution expenses represent all sales and marketing expenses not directly controlled by the product segments.
(3) Unallocated expenses represent nondirect corporate and general administrative expenses.
While we are predominately a computer software company, our business is organized geographically. Data for the geographic regions in which we operate is presented below:
| | Three months ended
|
---|
| | January 1, 2000
| | December 30, 2000
|
---|
Revenue: |
North America | | $104,256 | | $107,026 |
Europe | | 90,964 | | 77,028 |
Asia/Pacific | | 43,817 | | 50,890 |
| |
| |
|
Total revenue | | $239,037 | | $234,944 |
| |
| |
|
Total long-lived assets by geographic region have not changed significantly from September 30, 2000.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements about our anticipated financial results and growth based on our plans and assumptions. Important information about the bases for these plans and assumptions and certain factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from these statements are contained below and in“Important Factors That May Affect Future Results” beginning on page 13.
Business Overview
Historically, our core business focus has been to provide computer aided design, manufacturing and engineering (MCAD) solutions to customers through our flagship Pro/ENGINEER® design software, and we remain committed to providing our customers with industry-leading flexible engineering solutions based on this software. Additionally, we believe that there is growing demand for additional collaborative product commerce (CPC) solutions from manufacturers who, in order to stay competitive, must deliver more custom-tailored goods faster and at lower prices while relying more than ever before on geographically dispersed and dynamic supply chains. These CPC solutions include software and services that utilize Internet technologies to permit individuals — regardless of their role in the commercialization of a product, the computer-based tools they use, their location geographically or in the supply chain — to collaboratively design, develop, build and manage products throughout their entire lifecycle. In order to pursue this opportunity, we expanded our focus in 1999 to encompass a complete CPC solution and introduced our Web-based Windchill® information management and collaboration software. We continued this CPC focus in 2000 and will do so for the foreseeable future. This expanded focus allows us to increase the business impact our customers derive from our flexible engineering MCAD solutions and provides our customers with the additional tools they need to elevate their products into enterprise assets and to leverage these assets into new business opportunities.
As a result of the difficulty we experienced in transitioning from a one product company to a multi-product company and in balancing our efforts between our traditional MCAD solutions business and our growing CPC solutions business, in the third quarter of 2000 we reorganized ourselves to provide more discrete product line focus and accountability and to improve our overall profitability. The reorganization resulted in the creation of the following business units:
| · | Windchill Solutions. This business unit is responsible for expanding the product content, collaboration and sourcing services we provide to the CPC market. It develops new partnerships, business relationships and indirect channels of distribution in support of our web infrastructure efforts. Our Windchill exchange solution, called Windchill ProjectLink™ (formerly Windchill Netmarkets), provides these collaborative capabilities on Internet exchanges, portals and marketplaces, which, among other things, permits collaboration outside the corporate firewall. Windchill ProjectLink, which began in fiscal 2000 as an initiative to address the business-to-business exchange marketplace, was integrated into our Windchill Solutions business unit in November 2000. |
| · | MCAD Solutions. This business unit is responsible for the Pro/ENGINEER product line as well as other applications within our MCAD suite of flexible engineering solutions. It focuses full-time on the needs of the MCAD marketplace. |
Each unit is responsible for research and development, marketing, professional services, customer support and indirect sales. All of our solutions continue to be distributed primarily through our direct sales force. Within our direct sales force, there are geographic divisions focused both on the domestic market and on sales outside of the U.S. Each division, in turn, is further divided into two groups based on account type, with one group focusing on major accounts and the other on all other (primary) accounts. Moreover, we are attempting to broaden our indirect distribution channel and, toward that end, have formed alliances with systems integrators, resellers, strategic partners and entities with complementary software products.
Results of Operations
The following is an overview of our results of operations in the first quarter:
| · | Total revenue was $239.0 million for the first quarter of 2000 and $234.9 million for the first quarter of 2001. |
| · | Our year-over-year first quarter revenue declined 1.7% reflecting a 3.4% decrease in software license revenue and a 0.4% decrease in service revenue. |
| · | Windchill revenue increased from $38.3 million in the first quarter of 2000 to $50.4 million for the first quarter of 2001. |
| · | MCAD revenue decreased from $200.8 million in the first quarter of 2000 to $184.5 million in the first quarter of 2001. |
| · | Net income increased from $10.4 million for the first quarter of 2000 to $12.3 million for the first quarter of 2001. |
| · | Pro forma net income, which excludes the amortization of goodwill and intangible assets, increased from $17.6 million for the first quarter of 2000 to $19.0 million for the first quarter of 2001. |
The following table shows certain consolidated financial data as a percentage of our total revenue for the first quarter of 2000 and 2001.
| | Three months ended
|
---|
| | January 1, 2000
| | December 30, 2000
|
---|
Revenue: |
License | | 44 | % | | 43 | % |
Service | | 56 | | | 57 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Total revenue | | 100 | | | 100 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Costs and expenses: |
Cost of license revenue | | 2 | | | 2 | |
Cost of service revenue | | 23 | | | 25 | |
Sales and marketing | | 44 | | | 39 | |
Research and development | | 14 | | | 15 | |
General and administrative | | 7 | | | 8 | |
Amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets | | 4 | | | 4 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Total costs and expenses | | 94 | | | 93 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Operating income | | 6 | | | 7 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Other income, net | | — | | | — | |
| |
| | |
| |
Income before income taxes | | 6 | | | 7 | |
Provision for income taxes | | 2 | | | 2 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Net income | | 4 | % | | 5 | % |
| |
| | |
| |
Pro forma, excluding amortization of goodwill and intangible assets: |
Operating income | | 10 | % | | 11 | % |
Net income | | 7 | % | | 8 | % |
Revenue
As a result of our expanded focus on providing CPC solutions, software and service revenue from our Windchill products grew to 21% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2001, up from 16% in the first quarter of 2000. Overall, however, total revenue declined 2% in 2001 compared to 2000.
License revenue decreased 3.4% for the first quarter of 2001 compared to the first quarter of 2000. Several factors, including those described below, contributed to this decrease. While we continue to derive our license revenue primarily from our MCAD software solutions, our Windchill software solutions are continuing to comprise an increasing percentage of total license revenue. In order to meet what we believe is a large market opportunity for overall CPC solutions, over the past two years we have channeled significant resources into the Windchill product line. This emphasis on larger, more enterprise-wide solutions has resulted in longer and less predictable sales cycles and increased dependence on consummating larger transactions in general. The transfer of resources to Windchill also reduced the sales capacity for the MCAD product line and contributed to a loss of market share for MCAD.
In addition, we have experienced increased competition in the MCAD industry from native Windows®-based products offering more limited functionality at lower costs. Pro/ENGINEER unit sales decreased 7% in the first quarter of 2001 compared to the first quarter of 2000 and the average selling price of this software decreased by 1% in the first quarter of 2001 compared to 2000. We also experienced some weakness with existing customers in Europe during the first quarter of 2001. Additional factors affecting our revenues and operating results are listed under“Important Factors That May Affect Future Results” below.
In order to better leverage the efforts of our direct sales force, in October 1998 we appointed Rand A Technology Corporation as a full service MCAD distributor to small businesses in the United States and Europe. Rand’s performance was impacted by the transition required by this relationship and its level of revenue contribution has been lower than originally anticipated. In the fourth quarter of 2000, we modified our arrangement with Rand to remove Rand’s exclusivity in the small business segment while broadening Rand’s distribution rights on a non-exclusive basis. Our results could be adversely affected if Rand is unable to achieve certain sales levels or make existing or future payments.
We licensed over 90% of our products directly to end-user customers in each of the last three fiscal years. The balance was licensed through third-party distributors, primarily Rand. We expect the percentage of our MCAD products that we license through third-party distributors may increase in the future as we enter into new reseller and other distribution agreements.
Our service revenue is derived from the sale of software maintenance contracts and the performance of training and consulting services. Service revenue, which has a lower gross profit margin than license revenue, accounted for 57% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2001 and 56% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2000. Service revenue remained virtually unchanged in the first quarter of 2001 compared to the first quarter of 2000. We expect service revenue to increase for the remainder of 2001.
Over the past year, we implemented a number of strategic actions designed to improve profitability and provide a foundation for growth. For example, in order to provide more discrete product line focus and accountability we created separate business units with overall responsibility for our different product lines. Within our direct sales force we created geographic divisions on the domestic market and on sales outside the United States. Within these geographic divisions there are both major and primary account focused units. We have also broadened our indirect distribution channel through alliances with system integrators, resellers and other strategic partners. The system integrators will work in tandem with our direct sales force to locate and target potential CPC opportunities. We have also increased the number of distributors for our MCAD solutions to provide greater geographic coverage and specialized focus on discrete products. During the first quarter of 2001, we entered into arrangements with over fifty new distributors.
We derived 56% and 54% of our total revenue from sales to international customers in the first quarter of 2001 and 2000, respectively.
[Bar Chart Appears Here]
| North America | Europe | Asia/Pacific |
Q1 00 | $104.3 | $91.0 | $43.8 |
Q1 01 | $107.0 | $77.0 | $50.9 |
REVENUE BY GEOGRAPHY (IN MILLIONS)
Looking forward, our overall revenue levels will be dependent on our ability to successfully balance our efforts between our traditional MCAD business and our growing Windchill business. Our challenge is to effectively manage and improve performance in our MCAD business while continuing to aggressively pursue growth opportunities through our Windchill solutions. Toward this end, we believe that our initiatives in building separate business units and expanding our alliances and indirect distribution channels are having a positive impact on our transformation from a one product company to a multi-product company. Factors affecting our revenues and operating results are listed under“Important Factors That May Affect Future Results” below.
Costs and Expenses
From the fourth quarter of 1998 through the second quarter of 2000 we had been incurring expenses that would have supported revenues in excess of the then current levels in order to implement our strategic initiatives, particularly as they related to our Windchill solutions. Given the lower than expected revenue in the first two quarters of 2000, we reduced our existing cost structure during the third quarter of 2000 to improve profitability. As a result of these actions, costs and expenses decreased 3% to $218.9 million in the first quarter of 2001 compared to $225.1 million in the first quarter of 2000.
Cost of License Revenue
Our cost of license revenue consists of costs associated with reproducing and distributing software and documentation and the payment of royalties. Cost of license revenue as a percentage of license revenue was 4% for the first quarters of both 2001 and 2000.
Cost of Service Revenue
Our cost of service revenue includes costs associated with training and consulting personnel, such as salaries and related costs and travel, and costs related to software maintenance, including costs incurred for customer support personnel and the release of maintenance updates. Cost of service revenue as a percentage of service revenue was 44% and 42% for the first quarters of 2001 and 2000, respectively. This increase reflects our investment in the staffing necessary to support our new product offerings, principally our Windchill solutions.
Sales and Marketing
Our sales and marketing expenses primarily include salaries and benefits, sales commissions, travel and facility costs. These costs decreased 12% in the first quarter of 2001 compared to 2000 primarily due to our reorganization into business units in the third quarter of 2000 and the implementation of our strategy to broaden our indirect distribution channel through alliances with system integrators, resellers and other strategic partners. Total sales and marketing employees decreased 12% from 1,898 at January 1, 2000 to 1,662 at December 30, 2000.
Research and Development
Our research and development expenses consist principally of salaries and benefits, expenses associated with product translations, costs of computer equipment used in software development and facility expenses. These costs increased 5% for the first quarter of 2001 compared to 2000 primarily due to our continued investment in research and development, particularly in connection with our Windchill solutions.
General and Administrative
Our general and administrative expenses include the costs of our corporate, finance, information technology, human resources and administrative functions. These costs increased 15% in the first quarter of 2001 compared to 2000. These increases represent our continued investment in information technology infrastructure, investments in business process improvements and costs associated with supporting service revenue which has been increasing as a proportion of our total revenue.
Amortization of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
These costs represent the amortization of intangible assets acquired, including developed technology, goodwill, customer lists, assembled work force and trade names. Amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets as a percentage of total revenue was 4% for the first quarters of both 2001 and 2000.
Other Income, Net
Our other income, net includes interest income, interest expense, costs of hedging contracts, the gain or loss from the translation of results for subsidiaries for which the U.S. dollar is the functional currency and other charges incurred in connection with financing customer contracts. For the first quarter of 2001, we reported other income of $1.3 million compared to $643,000 for the first quarter of 2000. This increase is due primarily to lower charges incurred in connection with financing customer contracts, partially offset by higher hedging related costs.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 29% for the first quarters of both 2001 and 2000. The difference between our effective tax rate and the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% was due primarily to lower foreign effective tax rates and the use of the net operating losses of Computervision Corporation, which we acquired in 1998, partially offset by the non-deductibility of certain acquisition and nonrecurring charges.
Employees
The number of worldwide employees was 4,754 at December 30, 2000 compared to 5,051 at January 1, 2000. The decrease over the prior year is primarily a result of terminations associated with the reorganization into business units initiated during the third quarter of fiscal 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our operating activities, the proceeds from our issuance of stock under employee stock plans and existing cash and investments provided sufficient resources to fund our employee base, capital assets needs, stock repurchases, acquisitions and financing needs in the first quarters of both 2001 and 2000.
As of December 30, 2000, cash and investments totaled $291.9 million, down from $375.1 million at September 30, 2000. The primary reasons for the decrease in cash and investments during the first quarter of 2001 were $19.5 million in expenditures to acquire property and equipment, $46.8 million for the repurchase of treasury stock and a $24.9 million decrease in deferred revenue. Our investment portfolio is diversified among security types, industries and individual issuers. Our investments are generally liquid and investment grade. The portfolio is primarily invested in short-term securities to minimize interest rate risk and to facilitate rapid deployment in the event of immediate cash needs.
Cash utilized for operating activities was $16.4 million in the first quarter of 2001, compared to cash generated from operating activities of $2.0 million for the first quarter of 2000. In the first quarter of 2001, cash generated from net income of $12.3 million was primarily offset by cash utilization of $24.9 million from the decrease in deferred revenue, $9.5 million from accounts payable and accrued expenses, including accrued compensation, and $11.2 million from other current and noncurrent assets.
In the first quarter of 2001 we acquired $19.5 million of capital equipment compared to $10.8 million for 2000. The $19.5 million of capital expenditures in the first quarter of 2001 includes approximately $14.0 million primarily for tenant improvements and furniture and fixtures related to the new facility. The remaining expenditure for the first quarter of 2001, and the entire amount for the first quarter of 2000, consisted principally of computer equipment, software and office equipment. We expect to expend approximately $10 million in the second quarter of 2001 related to the new facility. We utilized $45.1 million of cash for financing activities during the first quarter of 2001, which was comprised of $46.8 million for the repurchase of 4.0 million shares of common stock, partially offset by $1.8 million from the issuance of common stock under our stock plans. Through December 30, 2000, we had repurchased 22.7 million of the 40.0 million shares authorized by the Board of Directors to be repurchased under our repurchase program. The repurchased shares under the repurchase program will be used for stock option exercises, employee stock purchase plans and acquisitions. The level of repurchases during the remainder of 2001 will be determined by management.
In December 1999, we sold land and certain improvements under construction for $30.8 million and entered into an operating lease covering approximately 381,000 square feet of office space in Needham, MA that will allow us to consolidate and replace our Waltham, MA operations. Our corporate offices currently occupy 210,000 square feet in the new Needham facility, and we expect to occupy the remaining 171,000 square feet in the second quarter of fiscal 2001, subject to completion of construction. Occupancy and rent began in December 2000. The lease expires in December 2012, subject to certain renewal rights.
We believe that existing cash and short-term investments together with cash generated from operations and the issuance of common stock under our employee stock plans will be sufficient to meet our working capital, financing and capital expenditure requirements through at least the end of the current fiscal year.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In accordance with recently issued accounting pronouncements, we will be required to comply with certain changes in accounting rules and regulations. See Note 5 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein.
Important Factors That May Affect Future Results
The following are some of the factors that could affect our future results. They should be considered in connection with evaluating forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and otherwise made by us or on our behalf, because these factors could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements.
I. Operational Considerations
Our operating results fluctuate within each quarter and from quarter-to-quarter making our future revenues and operating results difficult to predict
While our sales cycle varies substantially from customer to customer, we usually realize a high percentage of our revenue in the third month of each fiscal quarter, and this revenue tends to be concentrated in the later part of that month. Our orders early in a quarter will not generally occur at a rate which, if sustained throughout the quarter, would be sufficient to assure that we will meet our revenue targets for any particular quarter. Moreover, our reorganization into business units, our shift in business emphasis to a more solutions-oriented sales process —undertaken in part to increase our average order size—and our transition from a one product to a multi-product company have resulted in longer and more unpredictable sales cycles for products and services. Accordingly, our quarterly results may be difficult to predict prior to the end of the quarter. Any inability to obtain large orders or orders in large volumes or to make shipments or perform services in the period immediately preceding the end of any particular quarter may cause the results for that quarter to fall short of our revenue targets. In addition, our operating expenses are based on expected future revenue and are relatively fixed for the short term. As a result, a revenue shortfall in any quarter could cause our earnings for that quarter to fall below expectations as well. Any failure to meet our quarterly revenue or earnings targets could adversely impact the market price of our stock.
Other factors that may also cause quarter-to-quarter revenue and earnings fluctuation include the following:
| · | our sales incentive structure is weighted more heavily toward the end of the fiscal year, and the rate of revenue growth for the first quarter historically has been lower and more difficult to predict than that for the fourth quarter of the immediately preceding fiscal year; |
| · | variability in the levels of professional service revenues and the mix of our license and service revenues; |
| · | declines in license revenue may adversely affect the size of our installed base and our level of service revenue; and |
| · | the increased utilization of third parties, such as systems integrators, resellers, strategic partners and application service providers, as distribution mechanisms for our software products and related services, may lessen the control we have over any particular sales cycle. |
In addition, the levels of quarterly or annual software or service revenue in general, or for particular geographic areas, may not be comparable to those achieved in previous periods.
General economic conditions may impact our results
Our revenue growth and profitability depends on the overall demand for software and related services and accordingly, general economic and business conditions may affect our future operating results. A softening of demand for software caused by a weakening of the economy may result in decreased revenues or lower revenue growth rates.
We may not be able to implement new initiatives successfully
Part of our success in the past has resulted from our ability to implement new initiatives. Our future operating results will continue to depend upon:
| · | the successful implementation of a divisionalized business unit structure, including the realignment of internal functions, the management of divisionalized processes and effective mitigation of disruption that may result from organizational change; |
| · | our ability to sustain the appropriate balance between our MCAD and Windchill businesses; |
| · | our ability to appropriately allocate and implement cost cutting measures that increase profitability while maintaining adequate resources for effective and coordinated organizational performance; |
| · | the success of our sales force reorganization initiatives, including: |
| —our shift from point sales to solution sales, |
| —the effectiveness of our organizational sales model, |
| —the ability of our sales reps to learn and sell our products, and |
| —Rands’ and other distributors’ ability to perform successfully in the MCAD arena; |
| · | our ability to anticipate and meet evolving customer requirements in the CPC arena and successfully deliver products and services at an enterprise level; |
| · | our ability to broaden indirect distribution channels through alliances with systems integrators, resellers, strategic partners and application service providers; |
| · | our ability to develop Windchill ProjectLink opportunities; and |
| · | our ability to identify and penetrate additional industry sectors that represent growth opportunities. |
We may not be successful in integrating recently acquired businesses or products
We have increased our product range and customer base in the recent past due in part to acquisitions. We may acquire additional businesses or product lines in the future. The success of any acquisition may be dependent upon our ability to integrate the acquired business or products successfully and to retain key personnel and customers associated with the acquisition. If we fail to do so, or if the costs of or length of time for integration increase significantly, it could negatively affect our business.
We are dependent on key personnel whose loss could cause delays in our product development and sales efforts
Our success depends upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled technical, managerial and sales personnel. Competition for such personnel in the high technology industry is intense. We assume that we will continue to be able to attract and retain such personnel. The failure to do so, however, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We must continually modify and enhance our products to keep pace with changing technology, and we may experience delays in developing and debugging our software
We must continually modify and enhance our products to keep pace with changes in computer software, hardware and database technology, as well as emerging standards in the Internet software industry. Our ability to remain competitive will depend on our ability to:
| · | enhance our current offerings and develop new products and services that keep pace with technological developments through: |
| —internal research and development, |
| —acquisition of technology, and |
| · | meet evolving customer requirements, especially ease-of-use; |
| · | provide adequate funding for development efforts; and |
| · | license appropriate technology from third parties. |
Also, as is common in the computer software industry, we may from time to time experience delays in our product development and “debugging” efforts. Our performance could be hurt by significant delays in developing, completing or shipping new or enhanced products. Among other things, such delays could cause us to incorrectly predict the fiscal quarter in which we will realize revenue from the shipment of the new or enhanced products and give our competitors a greater opportunity to market competing products.
We may be unable to price our products competitively or distribute them effectively
Our success is tied to our ability to price our products and services competitively and to deliver them efficiently, including our ability to:
| · | provide products with functionality that our customers want at a price they can afford; |
| · | build appropriate direct distribution channels; |
| · | utilize the Internet for sales; and |
| · | build appropriate indirect distribution channels through Rand or others. |
We depend on sales from outside the United States that could be adversely affected by changes in the international markets
A significant portion of our business comes from outside the United States. Accordingly, our performance could be adversely affected by economic downturns in Europe or the Asia/Pacific region. Another consequence of significant international business is that a large percentage of our revenues and expenses are denominated in foreign currencies that fluctuate in value. Although we may enter into foreign exchange forward contracts and foreign exchange option contracts to offset a portion of the foreign exchange fluctuations, unanticipated events may have a material impact on our results. Other risks associated with international business include:
| · | changes in regulatory practices and tariffs; |
| · | staffing and managing foreign operations, including the difficulties in providing cost-effective, equity-based compensation to attract skilled workers; |
| · | longer collection cycles in certain areas; |
| · | potential changes in tax and other laws; |
| · | greater difficulty in protecting intellectual property rights; and |
| · | general economic and political conditions. |
We may not be able to obtain copyright or patent protection for the software products we develop or our other trademarks
Our software products and our other trademarks, including our company names, product names and logos, are proprietary. We protect our intellectual property rights in these items by relying on copyrights, trademarks, patents and common law safeguards, including trade secret protection, as well as restrictions on disclosures and transferability contained in our agreements with other parties. Despite these measures, there can be no assurance that the laws of all relevant jurisdictions will afford adequate protection to our products and other intellectual property. The software industry is characterized by frequent litigation regarding copyright, patent and other intellectual property rights. While we have not, to date, had any significant claims of this type asserted against us, there can be no assurance that someone will not assert such claims against us with respect to existing or future products or other intellectual property or that, if asserted, we would prevail in such claims. In the event a lawsuit of this type is filed, it could result in significant expense to us and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, whether or not we ultimately prevail. Certain of our products also contain technology developed and licensed from third parties. We may likewise be susceptible to infringement claims with respect to these third party technologies.
II. MCAD-Related Considerations
Increasing competition in the MCAD marketplace may reduce our revenues
There are an increasing number of competitive MCAD products. Despite our belief that our products are technologically superior, some competitive products have reached a level of functionality whereby product differentiation is less likely, in and of itself, to dislodge incumbent MCAD systems, given the training and other startup costs associated with system replacement. Increased competition and market acceptance of these competitive products could have a negative effect on pricing and revenues for our products, which could have a material adverse affect on our results.
In addition, our MCAD software is capable of performing on a variety of platforms. Several of our competitors focus on single platform applications, particularly Windows® - -based platforms. There can be no assurance that we will have a competitive advantage with multiple platform applications.
We continue to enhance our existing products by releasing updates. Our competitive position and operating results could suffer if:
| · | we fail to anticipate or to respond adequately to customer requirements or to technological developments, particularly those of our competitors; |
| · | we delay the development, production, testing, marketing or availability of new or enhanced products or services; or |
| · | customers fail to accept such products or services. |
Growth in the MCAD industry appears to have slowed
Growth in certain segments of the MCAD industry appears to have slowed and, coupled with decreased functional differentiation among flexible engineering tools, may affect our ability to penetrate the market for new customers and recapture our market share. Over the long term, we believe our emphasis on CPC solutions will allow us to differentiate our flexible engineering products from the competition and invigorate sales of those products. However, the strategy may not be successful or may take longer than we plan. There could be a material adverse affect on our operating results in any quarter if these assumptions prove to be incorrect.
III. Windchill Strategy Considerations
We are implementing a new strategy to capitalize on an Internet-based, business-to-business market opportunity known as Collaborative Product Commerce (CPC). It may be that our assumptions about the CPC market opportunity are wrong, which could adversely affect our results
We have identified CPC as a new market opportunity for us, and have devoted significant resources toward capitalizing on that opportunity. CPC solutions include software and services that utilize Internet technologies to permit employees, customers, suppliers and others to collaboratively develop, build and manage products throughout their entire lifecycle. Because the market for software products that allow companies to collaborate on product information on an enterprise-wide level is newly emerging and because companies have not traditionally linked customers and suppliers in this process directly, we cannot be certain as to the size of this market, whether it will grow, or whether companies will elect to utilize our products rather than attempt to develop applications internally or through other sources.
In addition, companies that have already invested substantial resources in other methods of sharing product information in the design-through-manufacture process may be reluctant to adopt a new approach that may replace, limit or compete with their existing systems or methods. We expect that we will continue to need to pursue intensive marketing and sales efforts to educate prospective customers about the uses and benefits of our products. Demand for and market acceptance of our products will be affected by the success of these efforts.
Our Windchill software, which is central to our CPC strategy, is relatively new and is not yet well established in the marketplace
The success of our CPC strategy will depend in large part on the ability of our Windchill solutions to meet customer expectations, especially with respect to:
| · | measuring and understanding the benefits of Windchill, including return on investment and value creation; |
| · | full capability, functionality and performance; |
| · | ability to support a large, diverse and geographically dispersed user base; and |
| · | quality and efficiency of the services we perform relating to implementation and customization. |
The software is still relatively new. If our customers cannot successfully deploy large-scale implementation projects or if they determine that we or our partners are unable to accommodate large-scale deployments, our operating results may be affected.
In addition, implementing a Windchill software solution on an enterprise level takes longer and requires greater expertise than does installing our other products. Our Windchill software must integrate with existing computer systems and software programs used by our customers and their partners. Because we are one of the first companies to offer a CPC solution, many customers will be facing these integration issues for the first time, particularly in the context of collaborating with members of the extended enterprise, including customers and supply chain partners. Our customers could become dissatisfied with our products or services if integrations prove to be difficult, costly or time consuming, and our operating results may be affected.
We intend to utilize third parties, such as system integrators, resellers, strategic partners and application service providers, for the distribution and implementation of Windchill software, which may result in management difficulties and customer retention problems
As an enterprise solution, Windchill may require large-scale organizational implementations that in today’s marketplace are often performed by third parties. We have entered into and are currently developing additional relationships with third parties and intend to continue to do so. Using third parties to both implement and promote our products can result in a reduction in our control to both drive the sales process and service our customers. In addition, the successful utilization of third parties will depend on:
| · | our ability to enter into definitive agreements with appropriate third parties that can deliver our products in appropriate markets; |
| · | the third party’s ability to learn, promote and implement our products; and |
| · | the effective coordination and management of joint activities (including sales, marketing, development, implementation and support) in order to deliver products and services that meet customer requirements. |
Competition among providers of CPC solutions may increase, which may reduce our profits and limit or reduce our market share
The market for CPC solutions is new, highly fragmented, rapidly changing and increasingly competitive. We expect competition to intensify, which could result in price reductions for our products and services, reduced gross margins and loss of market share. Our primary competition comes from:
| · | in-house development efforts by potential customers or partners; |
| · | other vendors of engineering information management software; and |
| · | larger, more well known enterprise software providers seeking to extend the functionality of their products to encompass CPC. |
In addition, our Global Services Organization may face increasing competition for follow-on customization services from other third-party consultants and service providers.
If use of the Internet does not continue to develop or reliably support the demands placed on it by electronic commerce, we may experience a loss of sales
Our success depends upon continued growth in the use of the Internet as a medium of commerce. Although the Internet is experiencing rapid growth in the overall number of users, this growth is a recent phenomenon and may not continue. Furthermore, the use of the Internet for commerce is still relatively new. As a result, a sufficiently broad base of companies and their supply chain partners may not adopt or continue to use the Internet as a medium of exchanging product information. Our CPC strategy would be seriously harmed if:
| · | use of the Internet does not continue to increase or increases more slowly than expected; |
| · | the infrastructure for the Internet does not effectively support enterprises and their supply chain partners; |
| · | the Internet does not create a viable commercial marketplace, thereby inhibiting the development of electronic commerce and reducing the demand for our products; or |
| · | concerns over the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks inhibit the growth of the Internet as a means of conducting commercial transactions. |
Our CPC strategy will also be seriously harmed if the Internet infrastructure is not able to support the demands placed on it by increased usage or the limited capacity of networks to transmit large amounts of data, or if delays in the development or adoption of new equipment standards or protocols required to handle increased levels of Internet activity, or increased governmental regulation, cause the Internet to lose its viability as a means of communication between manufacturers and their customers and supply chain partners.
Our Windchill ProjectLink solution provides CPC capabilities on Internet exchanges, portals and marketplaces. Accordingly, its success will be highly dependent upon the success of the Internet as a viable collaboration medium and on our successful development and integration of the technologies necessary to offer tools for exchanges, portals, and other forms of Net marketplaces that are acceptable to customers and suitable for the evolving nature of the Internet.
IV. Other Considerations
Our stock price, which may reflect an Internet valuation, has been highly volatile; this may make it harder to resell your shares at the time and at a price that is favorable to you
Market prices for securities of software companies have generally been volatile. In particular, the market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be subject to significant fluctuations.
In addition, our expanded focus on delivering Internet-based solutions may cause us to be viewed, in part, as an Internet company. Until the third quarter of 2000, the trading prices of Internet stocks in general were unusually high under conventional valuation standards such as price-to-earnings and price-to-sales ratios. Since then, they have experienced fluctuations unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. The trading prices and valuations of these stocks, and of ours, cannot be predicted. Negative changes in the public’s perception of the prospects of Internet or e-commerce companies, or of PTC as an Internet company, could depress our stock price regardless of our results.
Also, a large percentage of our common stock traditionally has been held by institutional investors. Purchases and sales of our common stock by certain of these institutional investors could have a significant impact on the market price of the stock. For more information, please see our proxy statement with respect to our most recent annual meeting of stockholders and Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC with respect to our common stock.
We are currently defending a securities class action lawsuit in which we could be liable for damages
Certain class action lawsuits were filed by shareholders in the fourth quarter of 1998 against us and certain of our current and former officers and directors in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts claiming violations of the federal securities laws based on alleged misrepresentations regarding our anticipated revenue and earnings for the third quarter of 1998. An amended complaint, consolidating these lawsuits into one action, was filed in the second quarter of 1999, seeking unspecified damages. We believe the claims made in the consolidated action are without merit, and we intend to defend them vigorously. In the third quarter of 1999, we filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated action. We cannot predict the outcome of this motion or the ultimate resolution of this action at this time, and there can be no assurance that the litigation will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Other than as disclosed in this report on Form 10-Q, there have been no significant changes in our market risk exposure as described in Item 7A: “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” to our 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
PART II— OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Certain class action lawsuits were filed by shareholders in the fourth quarter of 1998 against us and certain of our current and former officers and directors in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts claiming violations of the federal securities laws based on alleged misrepresentations regarding our anticipated revenue and earnings for the third quarter of 1998. An amended complaint, consolidating these lawsuits into one action, was filed in the second quarter of 1999, seeking unspecified damages. We believe the claims made in the consolidated action are without merit, and we intend to defend them vigorously. In the third quarter of 1999, we filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated action. We cannot predict the outcome of this motion or the ultimate resolution of this action at this time, and there can be no assurance that the litigation will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
We are also subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. We currently believe that resolving these matters will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES
On November 17, 2000, in exchange for consulting and marketing services, we issued to Accenture, a global management and technology consulting organization, a warrant exercisable for 8,333 shares of our common stock at a price of $12.50 per share, the fair market value of our common stock on the issue date. The warrant expires on November 17, 2003. The issuance of this warrant was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 because it did not involve a public offering.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
None.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended December 30, 2000.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
| PARAMETRIC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and |
| Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) |
Date: February 13, 2001