UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
or
[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number: 001-08029
THE RYLAND GROUP, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
| Maryland | | 52-0849948 | |
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
3011 Townsgate Road, Suite 200
Westlake Village, California 91361-3027
805-367-3800
(Address and Telephone Number of Principal Executive Offices)
Not Applicable
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one:)
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting o company |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
The number of shares of common stock of The Ryland Group, Inc. outstanding on May 5, 2014, was 46,915,547.
THE RYLAND GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
| Consolidated Statements of Earnings and |
| Other Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED | |
| | MARCH 31, | |
(in thousands, except share data) | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
REVENUES | | | | | |
Homebuilding | | $ | 481,485 | | $ | 363,501 | |
Financial services | | 8,198 | | 11,179 | |
TOTAL REVENUES | | 489,683 | | 374,680 | |
| | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | 379,999 | | 292,336 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 62,794 | | 50,517 | |
Financial services | | 9,609 | | 6,858 | |
Interest | | - | | 3,762 | |
TOTAL EXPENSES | | 452,402 | | 353,473 | |
| | | | | |
OTHER INCOME | | | | | |
Gain from marketable securities, net | | 404 | | 705 | |
Other income | | 485 | | 291 | |
TOTAL OTHER INCOME | | 889 | | 996 | |
Income from continuing operations before taxes | | 38,170 | | 22,203 | |
Tax expense | | 14,643 | | 199 | |
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | | 23,527 | | 22,004 | |
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes | | - | | 113 | |
NET INCOME | | $ | 23,527 | | $ | 22,117 | |
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 0.50 | | $ | 0.48 | |
Diluted | | $ | 0.42 | | $ | 0.43 | |
AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING | | | | | |
Basic | | 46,579,280 | | 45,434,996 | |
Diluted | | 58,126,928 | | 53,362,097 | |
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE | | $ | 0.03 | | $ | 0.03 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED | |
| | MARCH 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
| | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 23,527 | | $ | 22,117 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | | | | | |
Amortization of actuarial loss on defined benefit pension plan, net | | 5 | | - | |
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, available-for-sale, net | | 188 | | (124) | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | 193 | | (124) | |
Comprehensive income | | $ | 23,720 | | $ | 21,993 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
| Consolidated Balance Sheets |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
| | MARCH 31, | | DECEMBER 31, | |
(in thousands, except share data) | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
ASSETS | | (Unaudited) | | | |
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 259,153 | | $ | 227,986 | |
Restricted cash | | 85,253 | | 90,034 | |
Marketable securities, available-for-sale | | 264,689 | | 313,155 | |
Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities | | 609,095 | | 631,175 | |
Housing inventories | | | | | |
Homes under construction | | 741,304 | | 643,357 | |
Land under development and improved lots | | 973,720 | | 973,250 | |
Consolidated inventory not owned | | 34,469 | | 33,176 | |
Total housing inventories | | 1,749,493 | | 1,649,783 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | 26,811 | | 25,437 | |
Mortgage loans held-for-sale | | 69,037 | | 139,576 | |
Net deferred taxes | | 174,071 | | 185,904 | |
Other | | 146,223 | | 148,437 | |
Assets of discontinued operations | | - | | 30 | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | 2,774,730 | | 2,780,342 | |
| | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | 157,257 | | 172,841 | |
Accrued and other liabilities | | 191,097 | | 212,680 | |
Financial services credit facility | | 59,119 | | 73,084 | |
Debt | | 1,397,553 | | 1,397,308 | |
Liabilities of discontinued operations | | - | | 504 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | 1,805,026 | | 1,856,417 | |
| | | | | |
EQUITY | | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value: | | | | | |
Authorized—10,000 shares Series A Junior | | | | | |
Participating Preferred, none outstanding | | - | | - | |
Common stock, $1.00 par value: | | | | | |
Authorized—199,990,000 shares | | | | | |
Issued—46,866,216 shares at March 31, 2014 | | | | | |
(46,234,809 shares at December 31, 2013) | | 46,866 | | 46,235 | |
Retained earnings | | 906,482 | | 862,968 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (964 | ) | (1,157 | ) |
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | |
FOR THE RYLAND GROUP, INC. | | 952,384 | | 908,046 | |
NONCONTROLLING INTEREST | | 17,320 | | 15,879 | |
TOTAL EQUITY | | 969,704 | | 923,925 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | $ | 2,774,730 | | $ | 2,780,342 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED | |
| | MARCH 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
| | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
Net income from continuing operations | | $ | 23,527 | | $ | 22,004 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income from continuing operations | | | | | |
to net cash used for operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 4,718 | | 4,040 | |
Inventory and other asset impairments and write-offs | | 618 | | 213 | |
Realized gain on marketable securities | | (164 | ) | (152 | ) |
Decrease in deferred tax valuation allowance | | - | | (8,341 | ) |
Stock-based compensation expense | | 5,633 | | 4,449 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
Increase in inventories | | (100,211 | ) | (85,534 | ) |
Net change in other assets, payables and other liabilities | | 41,007 | | 55,294 | |
Other operating activities, net | | (162 | ) | (197 | ) |
Net cash used for operating activities from continuing operations | | (25,034 | ) | (8,224 | ) |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
Contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures | | (31 | ) | (35 | ) |
Return of investment in unconsolidated joint ventures | | - | | 200 | |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | | (4,704 | ) | (3,819 | ) |
Purchases of marketable securities, available-for-sale | | (119,344 | ) | (180,965 | ) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities, available-for-sale | | 169,487 | | 206,267 | |
Net cash provided by investing activities from continuing operations | | 45,408 | | 21,648 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
Repayments of borrowings against a revolving credit facility, net | | (13,965 | ) | - | |
Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings | | 78 | | (1,462 | ) |
Common stock dividends | | (1,432 | ) | (1,382 | ) |
Issuance of common stock under stock-based compensation | | 21,331 | | 14,477 | |
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash | | 4,781 | | (711 | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities from continuing operations | | 10,793 | | 10,922 | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations | | 31,167 | | 24,346 | |
Cash flows from operating activities—discontinued operations | | (27 | ) | (15 | ) |
Cash flows from investing activities—discontinued operations | | - | | 15 | |
Cash flows from financing activities—discontinued operations | | - | | - | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period1 | | 228,013 | | 158,114 | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD2 | | $ | 259,153 | | $ | 182,460 | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | | | | | |
Cash paid for income taxes | | $ | (949 | ) | $ | (84 | ) |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
(Increase) decrease in consolidated inventory not owned related to land options | | $ | (1,441 | ) | $ | 5,195 | |
1 Includes cash and cash equivalents of $27,000 associated with discontinued operations at December 31, 2013 and 2012.
2 Includes cash and cash equivalents of $27,000 associated with discontinued operations at March 31, 2013.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
| Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
| | | | | | ACCUMULATED | | |
| | | | | | OTHER | | TOTAL |
| | COMMON | | RETAINED | | COMPREHENSIVE | | STOCKHOLDERS’ |
(in thousands, except per share data) | | STOCK | | EARNINGS | | (LOSS) INCOME1 | | EQUITY |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2014 | | $ | 46,235 | | $ | 862,968 | | $ | (1,157 | ) | $ | 908,046 | |
Net income | | | | 23,527 | | | | 23,527 | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | | | | | 193 | | 193 | |
Common stock dividends (per share $0.03) | | | | (1,417 | ) | | | (1,417 | ) |
Stock-based compensation | | 631 | | 21,404 | | | | 22,035 | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2014 | | $ | 46,866 | | $ | 906,482 | | $ | (964 | ) | $ | 952,384 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
NONCONTROLLING INTEREST | | | | | | | | 17,320 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL EQUITY BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2014 | | | | | | | | | $ | 969,704 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 At March 31, 2014, the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss was comprised of an unrealized actuarial loss on defined benefit pension plan of $1.0 million, net of taxes of $637,000, and an unrealized gain on marketable securities, available-for-sale of $65,000. At December 31, 2013, the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss was comprised of an unrealized actuarial loss on defined benefit pension plan of $1.0 million, net of taxes of $640,000, and an unrealized loss on marketable securities, available-for-sale of $123,000. (See Note 4, “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.”)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
Note 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Ryland Group, Inc. and its 100 percent-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”). Noncontrolling interest represents the selling entities’ ownership interests in land and lot option purchase contracts. (See Note 11, “Variable Interest Entities (‘VIE’).”) Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Information is presented on a continuing operations basis unless otherwise noted. The results from continuing and discontinued operations are presented separately in the consolidated financial statements. Prior to January 1, 2014, the Company’s other income was included in selling, general and administrative expense. All prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2014 presentation. For a description of the Company’s accounting policies, see Note A, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in its 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2014, the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Other Comprehensive Income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, and the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity as of and for the three-month period ended March 31, 2014, have been prepared by the Company without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, including normally recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows at March 31, 2014, and for all periods presented, have been made. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements have been condensed or omitted. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Company has historically experienced, and expects to continue to experience, variability in quarterly results. Accordingly, the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014, are not necessarily indicative of the operating results expected for the year ending December 31, 2014.
Note 2. Other Income
Other income primarily consists of cancellation income from forfeited sales contract deposits, insurance-related income, interest income and various other types of ancillary income. The Company’s other income totaled $485,000 and $291,000 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Note 3. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income or loss consists of net income or loss; actuarial gains or losses on defined benefit pension plans; and the increase or decrease in unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale marketable securities, net of applicable taxes. Comprehensive income totaled $23.7 million and $22.0 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Note 4. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive income or loss consists of actuarial gains or losses on defined benefit pension plans and unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale marketable securities, as reported within the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity. Reclassification adjustments represent realized gains or losses on the sales of available-for-sale marketable securities and netted gains of $48,000 and $152,000 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Realized gains or losses were included in “Gain from marketable securities, net” within the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
7
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
The following table summarizes the components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:
| | MARCH 31, 2014 |
(in thousands) | | GROSS OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | | TAX BENEFIT | | NET OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
Amortization of actuarial loss on defined benefit pension plan | | $ | 8 | | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 5 | |
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, available-for-sale: | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, available-for-sale | | 236 | | - | | 236 | |
Less: reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income | | (48 | ) | - | | (48 | ) |
Total unrealized gain on marketable securities, available-for-sale | | 188 | | - | | 188 | |
Other comprehensive income | | $ | 196 | | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 193 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | MARCH 31, 2013 |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, available-for-sale: | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, available-for-sale | | $ | 28 | | $ | - | | $ | 28 | |
Less: reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income | | (152 | ) | - | | (152 | ) |
Total unrealized loss on marketable securities, available-for-sale | | (124 | ) | - | | (124 | ) |
Other comprehensive loss | | $ | (124 | ) | $ | - | | $ | (124 | ) |
Note 5. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $259.2 million and $228.0 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The Company considers all highly liquid short-term investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less and cash held in escrow accounts to be cash equivalents.
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had restricted cash of $85.3 million and $90.0 million, respectively. The Company has various secured letter of credit agreements that require it to maintain cash deposits as collateral for outstanding letters of credit. Cash restricted under these agreements totaled $84.4 million and $89.5 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. In addition, Ryland Mortgage Company and its subsidiaries and RMC Mortgage Corporation (“RMCMC”), collectively referred to as “RMC,” had restricted cash of $832,000 and $487,000 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Note 6. Segment Information
The Company is a leading national homebuilder and provider of mortgage-related financial services. As one of the largest single-family on-site homebuilders in the United States, it operates in 17 states across the country. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 280 (“ASC 280”), “Segment Reporting,” the Company has identified six reportable segments: four geographically determined homebuilding regions (North, Southeast, Texas and West); financial services; and corporate. The homebuilding segments specialize in the sale and construction of single-family attached and detached housing. The Company’s financial services segment, which includes RMC, RH Insurance Company, Inc. (“RHIC”) and Columbia National Risk Retention Group, Inc. (“CNRRG”), provides mortgage-related products and services, as well as title and escrow services, to its homebuyers. Corporate is a nonoperating business segment with the sole purpose of supporting operations. In order to best reflect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, certain corporate expenses are allocated to the homebuilding and financial services segments, along with certain assets and liabilities relating to employee benefit plans.
8
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on a number of factors, including segment pretax earnings and risk. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1, “Consolidated Financial Statements.”
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED | |
| | MARCH 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
REVENUES | | | | | |
Homebuilding | | | | | |
North | | $ | 133,564 | | $ | 95,682 | |
Southeast | | 126,667 | | 105,219 | |
Texas | | 111,151 | | 77,337 | |
West | | 110,103 | | 85,263 | |
Financial services | | 8,198 | | 11,179 | |
Total | | $ | 489,683 | | $ | 374,680 | |
EARNINGS (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES | | | | | |
Homebuilding | | | | | |
North | | $ | 10,794 | | $ | 3,339 | |
Southeast | | 14,857 | | 7,205 | |
Texas | | 7,847 | | 5,023 | |
West | | 12,728 | | 7,906 | |
Financial services | | (1,411 | ) | 4,321 | |
Corporate and unallocated | | (6,645 | ) | (5,591 | ) |
Total | | $ | 38,170 | | $ | 22,203 | |
The following table provides the Company’s total assets at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
| | MARCH 31, 2014 |
(in thousands) | | HOUSING INVENTORIES | | OTHER ASSETS | | TOTAL ASSETS |
Homebuilding | | | | | | | |
North | | $ | 481,432 | | $ | 51,476 | | $ | 532,908 | |
Southeast | | 438,285 | | 25,528 | | 463,813 | |
Texas | | 314,495 | | 31,485 | | 345,980 | |
West | | 515,281 | | 36,351 | | 551,632 | |
Financial services | | - | | 120,991 | | 120,991 | |
Corporate and unallocated | | - | | 759,406 | | 759,406 | |
Total | | $ | 1,749,493 | | $ | 1,025,237 | | $ | 2,774,730 | |
| | | | | | | |
Homebuilding | | DECEMBER 31, 2013 |
North | | $ | 464,777 | | $ | 48,314 | | $ | 513,091 | |
Southeast | | 397,237 | | 24,143 | | 421,380 | |
Texas | | 290,018 | | 37,310 | | 327,328 | |
West | | 497,751 | | 30,248 | | 527,999 | |
Financial services | | - | | 193,652 | | 193,652 | |
Corporate and unallocated | | - | | 796,862 | | 796,862 | |
Total | | $ | 1,649,783 | | $ | 1,130,529 | | $ | 2,780,312 | |
Note 7. Earnings Per Share Reconciliation
The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with ASC No. 260, (“ASC 260”), “Earnings per Share,” which requires earnings per share for each class of stock to be calculated using the two-class method. The two-class method is the method by which a company allocates earnings or loss between holders of its common stock and its participating security holders. Under the two-class method, the allocation of earnings or loss between common shareholders and other security holders is based on their respective participation rights in dividends
9
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
and undistributed earnings for the reporting period. All outstanding nonvested shares of restricted stock that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends are considered participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The Company’s nonvested shares of restricted stock are considered participating securities in accordance with ASC 260.
The following table displays the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED |
| | MARCH 31, |
(in thousands, except share data) | | 2014 | | 2013 |
NUMERATOR | | | | | |
Net income from continuing operations | | $ | 23,527 | | $ | 22,004 | |
Net income from discontinued operations | | - | | 113 | |
Less: distributed earnings allocated to nonvested restricted stock | | - | | (3 | ) |
Less: undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested restricted stock | | (30 | ) | (111 | ) |
Numerator for basic income per share | | 23,497 | | 22,003 | |
Plus: interest on 1.6 percent convertible senior notes due 2018 | | 729 | | 729 | |
Plus: interest on 0.25 percent convertible senior notes due 2019 | | 299 | | - | |
Plus: undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested restricted stock | | 30 | | 111 | |
Less: undistributed earnings reallocated to nonvested restricted stock | | (24 | ) | (95 | ) |
Numerator for diluted income per share | | $ | 24,531 | | $ | 22,748 | |
| | | | | |
DENOMINATOR | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share–weighted-average shares | | 46,579,280 | | 45,434,996 | |
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | |
Share-based payments | | 957,906 | | 903,321 | |
1.6 percent convertible senior notes due 2018 | | 7,023,780 | | 7,023,780 | |
0.25 percent convertible senior notes due 2019 | | 3,565,962 | | - | |
Diluted earnings per share-adjusted weighted-average | | | | | |
shares and assumed conversions | | 58,126,928 | | 53,362,097 | |
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 0.50 | | $ | 0.48 | |
Diluted | | $ | 0.42 | | $ | 0.43 | |
Note 8. Marketable Securities, Available-for-sale
The Company’s investment portfolio includes U.S. Treasury securities; obligations of U.S. government agencies; municipal debt securities; corporate debt securities; asset-backed securities of U.S. government agencies and covered bonds; time deposits; and short-term pooled investments. These investments are primarily held in the custody of a single financial institution. As defined in ASC No. 320 (“ASC 320”), “Investments—Debt and Equity Securities,” the Company considers its investment portfolio to be available-for-sale. Accordingly, these investments are recorded at their fair values. The cost of securities sold is based on an average-cost basis. Unrealized gains and losses on these investments were included in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company periodically reviews its available-for-sale securities for other-than-temporary declines in fair values that are below their cost bases, as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company believed that the cost bases for its available-for-sale securities were recoverable in all material respects.
For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, net realized earnings associated with the Company’s investment portfolio, which included interest, dividends and net realized gains on sales of marketable securities, totaled $404,000 and $705,000, respectively. These earnings were included in “Gain from marketable securities, net” within the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Realized gains or losses on the sales of marketable securities were included as reclassification adjustments. (See Note 4, “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.”)
10
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
The following table displays the fair values of marketable securities, available-for-sale, by type of security:
| | MARCH 31, 2014 |
(in thousands) | | AMORTIZED COST | | GROSS UNREALIZED GAINS | | GROSS UNREALIZED LOSSES | | ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE |
Type of security: | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury securities | | $ | 70,542 | | $ | 198 | | $ | - | | $ | 70,740 | |
Obligations of U.S. government agencies | | 16,288 | | 1 | | (11 | ) | 16,278 | |
Municipal debt securities | | 28,249 | | 655 | | (771 | ) | 28,133 | |
Corporate debt securities | | 119,178 | | 99 | | (20 | ) | 119,257 | |
Asset-backed securities | | 17,785 | | 73 | | (22 | ) | 17,836 | |
Total debt securities | | 252,042 | | 1,026 | | (824 | ) | 252,244 | |
Time deposits | | 1,408 | | - | | - | | 1,408 | |
Short-term pooled investments | | 11,037 | | - | | - | | 11,037 | |
Total marketable securities, available-for-sale | | $ | 264,487 | | $ | 1,026 | | $ | (824 | ) | $ | 264,689 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | DECEMBER 31, 2013 | |
Type of security: | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury securities | | $ | 76,355 | | $ | 149 | | $ | - | | $ | 76,504 | |
Obligations of U.S. government agencies | | 17,074 | | 2 | | (8 | ) | 17,068 | |
Municipal debt securities | | 33,492 | | 492 | | (1,008 | ) | 32,976 | |
Corporate debt securities | | 157,798 | | 102 | | (21 | ) | 157,879 | |
Asset-backed securities | | 20,433 | | 76 | | (20 | ) | 20,489 | |
Total debt securities | | 305,152 | | 821 | | (1,057 | ) | 304,916 | |
Time deposits | | 1,606 | | - | | - | | 1,606 | |
Short-term pooled investments | | 6,633 | | - | | - | | 6,633 | |
Total marketable securities, available-for-sale | | $ | 313,391 | | $ | 821 | | $ | (1,057 | ) | $ | 313,155 | |
The primary objectives of the Company’s investment portfolio are safety of principal and liquidity. Investments are made with the purpose of achieving the highest rate of return consistent with these two objectives. The Company’s investment policy limits investments to debt rated investment grade or better, as well as to bank and money market instruments and to issues by the U.S. government, U.S. government agencies and municipal or other institutions primarily with investment-grade credit ratings. Policy restrictions are placed on maturities, as well as on concentration by type and issuer.
The following table displays the fair values of marketable securities, available-for-sale, by contractual maturity:
(in thousands) | | MARCH 31, 2014 | | DECEMBER 31, 2013 | |
Contractual maturity: | | | | | |
Maturing in one year or less | | $ | 108,440 | | $ | 129,384 | |
Maturing after one year through three years | | 122,236 | | 154,169 | |
Maturing after three years | | 21,568 | | 21,363 | |
Total debt securities | | 252,244 | | 304,916 | |
Time deposits and short-term pooled investments | | 12,445 | | 8,239 | |
Total marketable securities, available-for-sale | | $ | 264,689 | | $ | 313,155 | |
Note 9. Housing Inventories
Housing inventories consist principally of homes under construction and land under development and improved lots. Inventory includes land and development costs; direct construction costs; capitalized indirect construction costs; capitalized interest; and real estate taxes. The costs of acquiring and developing land and constructing certain related amenities are allocated to the parcels to which these costs relate. Inventories to be held and used
11
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
are stated at cost unless a community is determined to be impaired, in which case the impaired inventories are written down to their fair values.
As required by ASC No. 360 (“ASC 360”), “Property, Plant and Equipment,” inventory is reviewed for potential write-downs on an ongoing basis. ASC 360 requires that, in the event that impairment indicators are present and undiscounted cash flows signify that the carrying amount of an asset is not recoverable, impairment charges must be recorded if the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount. The Company reviews all communities on a quarterly basis for changes in events or circumstances indicating signs of impairment. Examples of events or changes in circumstances include, but are not limited to: price declines resulting from sustained competitive pressures; a change in the manner in which the asset is being used; a change in assessments by a regulator or municipality; cost increases; the expectation that, more likely than not, an asset will be sold or disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life; or the impact of local economic or macroeconomic conditions, such as employment or housing supply, on the market for a given product. Signs of impairment may include, but are not limited to: very low or negative profit margins, the absence of sales activity in an open community and/or significant price differences for comparable parcels of land held-for-sale.
If it is determined that indicators of impairment exist in a community, undiscounted cash flows are prepared and analyzed at a community level based on expected pricing; sales rates; construction costs; local municipality fees; warranty, closing, carrying, selling, overhead and other related costs; or on similar assets to determine if the realizable values of the assets held are less than their respective carrying amounts. In order to determine assumed sales prices included in cash flow models, the Company analyzes historical sales prices on homes delivered in the community and in other communities located within the same geographic area, as well as sales prices included in its current backlog for such communities. In addition, it analyzes market studies and trends, which generally include statistics on sales prices of similar products in neighboring communities and sales prices of similar products in non-neighboring communities located within the same geographic area. In order to estimate the costs of building and delivering homes, the Company generally assumes cost structures reflecting contracts currently in place with vendors, adjusted for any anticipated cost-reduction initiatives or increases. The Company’s analysis of each community generally assumes current pricing equal to current sales orders for a particular or comparable community. For a minority of communities that the Company does not intend to operate for an extended period of time or where the operating life extends beyond several years, slight increases over current sales prices are assumed in later years. Once a community is considered to be impaired, the Company’s determinations of fair value and new cost basis are primarily based on discounting estimated cash flows at rates commensurate with inherent risks associated with the continuing assets. Discount rates used generally vary from 17.0 percent to 30.0 percent, depending on market risk, the size or life of a community and development risk. Due to the fact that estimates and assumptions included in cash flow models are based on historical results and projected trends, unexpected changes in market conditions that may lead to additional impairment charges in the future cannot be anticipated.
Valuation adjustments are recorded against homes completed or under construction, land under development or improved lots when analyses indicate that the carrying values are greater than the fair values. Write-downs of impaired inventories to their fair values are recorded as adjustments to the cost basis of the respective inventory. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, valuation reserves related to impaired inventories totaled $147.5 million and $154.8 million, respectively. The net carrying values of the related inventories totaled $149.3 million and $155.9 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
12
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
Interest and taxes are capitalized during active development and construction stages. Capitalized interest is amortized when the related inventory is delivered to homebuyers. The following table summarizes the activity that relates to capitalized interest:
(in thousands) | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
Capitalized interest at January 1 | | $ | 89,619 | | $ | 82,773 | |
Interest capitalized | | 17,111 | | 12,894 | |
Interest amortized to cost of sales | | (10,470 | ) | (11,114 | ) |
Capitalized interest at March 31 | | $ | 96,260 | | $ | 84,553 | |
Interest incurred | | $ | 17,383 | | $ | 16,805 | |
The following table summarizes each reporting segment’s total number of lots owned and lots controlled under option agreements:
| | MARCH 31, 2014 | | DECEMBER 31, 2013 | |
| | LOTS | | LOTS | | | | LOTS | | LOTS | | | |
| | OWNED | | OPTIONED | | TOTAL | | OWNED | | OPTIONED | | TOTAL | |
North | | 6,900 | | 6,969 | | 13,869 | | 6,382 | | 7,455 | | 13,837 | |
Southeast | | 8,559 | | 2,765 | | 11,324 | | 8,114 | | 2,439 | | 10,553 | |
Texas | | 4,063 | | 2,982 | | 7,045 | | 3,886 | | 3,147 | | 7,033 | |
West | | 5,146 | | 1,470 | | 6,616 | | 5,158 | | 1,561 | | 6,719 | |
Total | | 24,668 | | 14,186 | | 38,854 | | 23,540 | | 14,602 | | 38,142 | |
Note 10. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company records goodwill associated with its business acquisitions when the consideration paid exceeds the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired. The Company’s goodwill balance was $36.9 million at March 31, 2014, which included $13.5 million in the North, $8.1 million in the Southeast, $6.6 million in Texas and $8.7 million in the West. The Company’s goodwill balance was $37.1 million at December 31, 2013, which included $13.7 million in the North, $8.1 million in the Southeast, $6.6 million in Texas and $8.7 million in the West. Goodwill was included in “Other” assets within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. ASC No. 350 (“ASC 350”), “Intangibles–Goodwill and Other,” requires that goodwill and certain intangible assets be reviewed for impairment at least annually. The Company performs impairment tests of its goodwill annually as of November 30 or whenever significant events or changes occur that indicate impairment of goodwill may exist. The Company tests goodwill for impairment by using the two-step process prescribed in ASC 350. The first step identifies potential impairment, while the second step measures the amount of impairment.
Note 11. Variable Interest Entities (“VIE”)
As required by ASC No. 810 (“ASC 810”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” a VIE is to be consolidated by a company if that company has a controlling financial interest in the VIE, defined as both the power to direct the VIE’s activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, as well the obligation to absorb its losses or the right to receive its benefits, which are potentially significant to the VIE. ASC 810 also requires disclosures about VIEs that a company is not obligated to consolidate, but in which it has a significant, though not primary, variable interest.
The Company enters into joint ventures, from time to time, for the purpose of acquisition and co-development of land parcels and lots. Its investment in these joint ventures may create a variable interest in a VIE, depending on the contractual terms of the arrangement. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, all of the Company’s joint ventures were unconsolidated and accounted for under the equity method as it did not have a controlling
13
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
financial interest in the joint ventures. (See Note 12, “Investments in Joint Ventures.”) Additionally, in the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into lot option purchase contracts in order to procure land for the construction of homes. Under such lot option purchase contracts, the Company funds stated deposits in consideration for the right to purchase lots at a future point in time, usually at predetermined prices. The Company’s liability is generally limited to forfeiture of nonrefundable deposits, letters of credit and other nonrefundable amounts incurred. In accordance with the requirements of ASC 810, certain of the Company’s lot option purchase contracts may result in the creation of a variable interest in a VIE.
In compliance with the provisions of ASC 810, the Company consolidated $34.5 million and $33.2 million of inventory not owned related to a lot option purchase contract at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Although the Company may not have had legal title to the optioned land, under ASC 810, it had the primary variable interest and was required to consolidate the particular VIE’s assets under option at fair value. To reflect the fair value of the inventory consolidated under ASC 810, the Company included $17.1 million and $17.3 million of its related cash deposits for the lot option purchase contract at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, in “Consolidated inventory not owned” within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Noncontrolling interest totaled $17.3 million and $15.9 million with respect to the consolidation of the contract at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, representing the selling entities’ ownership interest in the VIE. Additionally, the Company had cash deposits and/or letters of credit totaling $36.9 million and $36.6 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, that were associated with lot option purchase contracts having aggregate purchase prices of $473.7 million and $482.8 million, respectively. As the Company did not have the primary variable interest in these contracts, it was not required to consolidate them.
Note 12. Investments in Joint Ventures
The Company enters into joint ventures, from time to time, for the purpose of acquisition and co-development of land parcels and lots, which are then sold to the Company, its joint venture partners or others at market prices. It participates in a number of joint ventures in which it does not have a controlling interest. As of March 31, 2014, the Company participated in six active homebuilding joint ventures in the Austin, Chicago, Denver, San Antonio and Washington, D.C., markets. The Company recognizes its share of the respective joint ventures’ earnings or losses from the sale of lots to other homebuilders. It does not, however, recognize earnings from lots that it purchases from the joint ventures. Instead, the Company reduces its cost basis in each lot by its share of the earnings from the lot.
The following table summarizes each reporting segment’s total estimated share of lots owned by the Company under its joint ventures:
| | MARCH 31, 2014 | | DECEMBER 31, 2013 | |
North | | 150 | | 150 | |
Texas | | 252 | | 252 | |
West | | 226 | | 226 | |
Total | | 628 | | 628 | |
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company’s investments in its unconsolidated joint ventures totaled $12.7 million and $12.6 million, respectively, and were included in “Other” assets within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s equity in earnings from its unconsolidated joint ventures totaled $102,000 and $164,000, respectively.
14
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
Note 13. Debt and Credit Facilities
The following table presents the composition of the Company’s homebuilder debt and its financial services credit facility at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
(in thousands) | | MARCH 31, 2014 | | DECEMBER 31, 2013 |
Senior notes | | | | | |
5.4 percent senior notes due January 2015 | | $ | 126,481 | | $ | 126,481 | |
8.4 percent senior notes due May 2017 | | 230,000 | | 230,000 | |
6.6 percent senior notes due May 2020 | | 300,000 | | 300,000 | |
5.4 percent senior notes due October 2022 | | 250,000 | | 250,000 | |
Convertible senior notes | | | | | |
1.6 percent convertible senior notes due May 2018 | | 225,000 | | 225,000 | |
0.25 percent convertible senior notes due June 2019 | | 267,500 | | 267,500 | |
Total senior notes and convertible senior notes | | 1,398,981 | | 1,398,981 | |
Debt discount | | (2,195 | ) | (2,362 | ) |
Senior notes and convertible senior notes, net | | 1,396,786 | | 1,396,619 | |
Secured notes payable | | 767 | | 689 | |
Total debt | | $ | 1,397,553 | | $ | 1,397,308 | |
Financial services credit facility | | $ | 59,119 | | $ | 73,084 | |
At March 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding (a) $126.5 million of 5.4 percent senior notes due January 2015; (b) $230.0 million of 8.4 percent senior notes due May 2017; (c) $225.0 million of 1.6 percent convertible senior notes due May 2018; (d) $267.5 million of 0.25 percent convertible senior notes due June 2019; (e) $300.0 million of 6.6 percent senior notes due May 2020; and (f) $250.0 million of 5.4 percent senior notes due October 2022. Each of the senior notes pays interest semiannually and all, except for the convertible senior notes due May 2018 and June 2019, may be redeemed at a stated redemption price, in whole or in part, at the option of the Company at any time.
To provide letters of credit required in the ordinary course of its business, the Company has various secured letter of credit agreements that require it to maintain restricted cash deposits for outstanding letters of credit. Outstanding letters of credit totaled $88.6 million and $93.6 million under these agreements at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
To finance its land purchases, the Company may also use seller-financed nonrecourse secured notes payable. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, outstanding seller-financed nonrecourse secured notes payable totaled $767,000 and $689,000, respectively.
Senior notes and indenture agreements are subject to certain covenants that include, among other things, restrictions on additional secured debt and the sale of assets. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at March 31, 2014.
During April 2014, RMCMC entered into a $50.0 million warehouse line of credit with Comerica Bank, which will expire in April 2015. This facility is used to fund, and is secured by, mortgages that were originated by RMCMC and are pending sale. Under the terms of this facility, RMCMC is required to maintain various financial and other covenants and to satisfy certain requirements relating to the mortgages securing the facility.
During 2011, RMC entered into a $50.0 million repurchase credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPM”), which was subsequently increased to $100.0 million during the first quarter of 2014 and will expire in December 2014. This facility is used to fund, and is secured by, mortgages that were originated by RMC and are
15
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
pending sale. Under the terms of the facility, RMC is required to maintain various financial and other covenants and to satisfy certain requirements relating to the mortgages securing the facility. At March 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with these covenants. The Company had outstanding borrowings against this credit facility that totaled $59.1 million and $73.1 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The weighted-average effective interest rate on the outstanding borrowings against this facility was 3.4 percent at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Note 14. Fair Values of Financial and Nonfinancial Instruments
Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments are held for purposes other than trading. The fair values of these financial instruments are based on quoted market prices, where available, or are estimated using other valuation techniques. Estimated fair values are significantly affected by the assumptions used. As required by ASC No. 820 (“ASC 820”), “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” fair value measurements of financial instruments are categorized as Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3, based on the types of inputs used in estimating fair values.
Level 1 fair values are those determined using quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 fair values are those determined using directly or indirectly observable inputs in the marketplace that are other than Level 1 inputs. Level 3 fair values are those determined using unobservable inputs, including the use of internal assumptions, estimates or models. Valuations, therefore, are sensitive to the assumptions used for these items. Fair values represent the Company’s best estimates as of the balance sheet date and are based on existing conditions and available information at the issuance date of these financial statements. Subsequent changes in conditions or available information may change assumptions and estimates.
The following table displays the values and methods used for measuring the fair values of financial instruments on a recurring basis:
| | FAIR VALUE |
(in thousands) | | HIERARCHY | | MARCH 31, 2014 | | DECEMBER 31, 2013 |
Marketable securities, available-for-sale | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury securities | | Level 1 | | $ | 70,740 | | $ | 76,504 | |
Obligations of U.S. government agencies | | Level 1 | | 16,278 | | 17,068 | |
Municipal debt securities | | Level 2 | | 28,133 | | 32,976 | |
Corporate debt securities | | Level 2 | | 119,257 | | 157,879 | |
Asset-backed securities | | Level 2 | | 17,836 | | 20,489 | |
Time deposits | | Level 2 | | 1,408 | | 1,606 | |
Short-term pooled investments | | Level 1 | | 11,037 | | 6,633 | |
Mortgage loans held-for-sale | | Level 2 | | 69,037 | | 139,576 | |
Mortgage interest rate lock commitments | | Level 2 | | 6,108 | | 5,218 | |
Forward-delivery contracts | | Level 2 | | (382 | ) | 2,261 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Marketable Securities, Available-for-sale
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had $264.7 million and $313.2 million, respectively, of marketable securities that were available-for-sale and comprised of U.S. Treasury securities; obligations of U.S. government agencies; municipal debt securities; corporate debt securities; asset-backed securities of U.S. government agencies and covered bonds; time deposits; and short-term pooled investments. The Company’s marketable securities, available-for-sale that were identified as Level 2 were valued based on quoted market prices of similar instruments. (See Note 8, “Marketable Securities, Available-for-sale.”)
Other Financial Instruments
Mortgage loans held-for-sale and forward-delivery contracts are based on quoted market prices of similar instruments (Level 2). Interest rate lock commitments (“IRLCs”) are valued at their aggregate market price
16
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
premium or deficit, plus a servicing premium, multiplied by the projected close ratio (Level 2). The market price premium or deficit is based on quoted market prices of similar instruments; the servicing premium is based on contractual investor guidelines for each product; and the projected close ratio is determined utilizing an external modeling system, widely used within the industry, to estimate customer behavior at an individual loan level. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, contractual principal amounts of mortgage loans held-for-sale totaled $67.6 million and $137.5 million, respectively. The fair values of IRLCs were included in “Other” assets within the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and forward-delivery contracts were included in “Other” assets and “Accrued and other liabilities” within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Gains realized on the IRLC pipeline, including activity and changes in fair value, totaled $891,000 and $1.3 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Losses on forward-delivery contracts used to hedge IRLCs totaled $3.1 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2014, compared to gains on forward-delivery contracts used to hedge IRLCs that totaled $665,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013. Gains on loan sales totaled $5.4 million and $4.8 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Net gains and losses related to IRLCs, forward-delivery contracts and loan sales were included in “Financial services” revenues within the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
The excess of the aggregate fair value over the aggregate unpaid principal balance for mortgage loans held-for-sale measured at fair value totaled $1.5 million and $2.1 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. These amounts were included in “Financial services” revenues within the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. At March 31, 2014, the Company held two repurchased loans with payments 90 days or more past due that had an aggregate carrying value of $466,000 and an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $737,000. At December 31, 2013, the Company held two repurchased loans with payments 90 days or more past due that had an aggregate carrying value of $467,000 and an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $738,000.
While recorded fair values represent management’s best estimate based on data currently available, future changes in interest rates or in market prices for mortgage loans, among other factors, could materially impact these fair values.
Nonfinancial Instruments
In accordance with ASC 820, the Company measures certain nonfinancial homebuilding assets at their fair values on a nonrecurring basis. (See Note 9, “Housing Inventories.”) There were no housing inventory or other assets held-for-sale impaired at March 31, 2014. At December 31, 2013, there was no housing inventory impaired, however, the fair values of other assets held-for-sale that were impaired totaled $596,000. Impairment charges related to these assets totaled $154,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Note 15. Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets are recognized for estimated tax effects that are attributable to deductible temporary differences and tax carryforwards related to tax credits and net operating losses (“NOLs”). They are realized when existing temporary differences are carried back to a profitable year(s) and/or carried forward to a future year(s) having taxable income. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if an assessment of their components indicates that it is more likely than not that all or some portion of these assets will not be realized. In the assessment for a valuation allowance, appropriate consideration is given to all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative losses; actual earnings; forecasts of future earnings; the duration of statutory carryforward periods; the Company’s experience with NOL carryforwards not expiring unused; and tax planning alternatives.
17
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
Based on an evaluation of positive and negative evidence regarding its ability to realize its deferred tax assets in accordance with ASC No. 740 (“ASC 740”), “Income Taxes,” at June 30, 2013, the Company concluded that the positive evidence outweighed the negative evidence and that it was more likely than not that all of its federal deferred tax assets would be realized. These significant changes in evidence at June 30, 2013, led the Company to determine that it was appropriate to reverse all of the valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. As a result, the Company reversed $187.5 million of the valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, which was calculated on an annual basis, during the second quarter of 2013. After this reversal, the Company had a valuation allowance of $46.4 million against its deferred tax assets, which represented an estimation of the allowance required for the second half of 2013. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had net deferred tax assets of $174.1 million and $185.9 million, respectively, with no valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.
Changes in positive and negative evidence, including differences between the Company’s future operating results and estimates could result in the establishment of a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. The accounting for deferred taxes is based upon estimates of future results. Differences between the anticipated and actual outcomes of these future results could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position. Also, changes in existing federal and state tax laws and tax rates could affect future tax results and the valuation allowance against the Company’s deferred tax assets.
For federal purposes, NOLs can be carried forward 20 years; for state purposes, they can generally be carried forward 10 to 20 years, depending on the taxing jurisdiction. Federal NOL carryforwards, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2031. Additionally, the Company has other carryforwards primarily composed of federal tax credits that can be carried forward 20 years with expiration dates beginning in 2029. The Company anticipates full utilization of these carryforwards and tax credits.
The Company’s provision for income tax presented overall effective income tax expense rates of 38.4 percent and 0.9 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The change in the overall effective income tax expense rate for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, was primarily due to adjustments made to the Company’s deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which offset income generated in the prior period.
Note 16. Long-Term Incentive and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans
Executive Officer Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”)
During the first quarter of 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2014 LTIP pursuant to the 2011 Equity and Incentive Plan. The 2014 LTIP provides for a target award of 141,566 performance share units, which are equivalent to shares of common stock. The 2014 LTIP will use a three-year long-term performance period and measure the Company’s relative total stockholder return (“TSR”) and growth in revenues to determine the amount of performance shares earned at the end of the performance period, which is December 31, 2016. Half of the target amount of performance shares is earned by an executive officer if the Company’s TSR is at the 50th percentile of the performance of the compensation peer group as measured over the long-term performance period. If its relative TSR performance exceeds or falls below this target level, half of the target amount of performance shares earned by an executive officer is calculated such that it is reduced to zero at or below the 30th percentile level or increased to a maximum level of 200 percent at or above the 90th percentile level. The other half of the target amount of performance shares is earned if the Company’s revenue growth over the long-term performance period is 30 percent. If its revenue growth exceeds or falls below this target level, half of the target amount of performance shares earned by an executive officer is calculated such that it is reduced to zero for revenue growth at or below 20 percent or increased to a maximum level of 200 percent for revenue growth at or
18
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
above 40 percent. There are incremental adjustments for the calculation of earned performance shares between these minimum and maximum levels of performance.
In 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2013 LTIP pursuant to the 2011 Equity and Incentive Plan. The 2013 LTIP provides for a target award of 135,332 performance share units, which are equivalent to shares of common stock. The 2013 LTIP will use a three-year long-term performance period and measure the Company’s relative TSR and growth in revenues to determine the amount of performance shares earned at the end of the performance period, which is December 31, 2015. Half of the target amount of performance shares is earned by an executive officer if the Company’s TSR is at the 50th percentile of the performance of the compensation peer group as measured over the long-term performance period. If its relative TSR performance exceeds or falls below this target level, half of the target amount of performance shares earned by an executive officer is calculated such that it is reduced to zero at or below the 30th percentile level or increased to a maximum level of 200 percent at or above the 90th percentile level. The other half of the target amount of performance shares is earned if the Company’s revenue growth over the long-term performance period is 60 percent. If its revenue growth exceeds or falls below this target level, half of the target amount of performance shares earned by an executive officer is calculated such that it is reduced to zero for revenue growth at or below 45 percent or increased to a maximum level of 200 percent for revenue growth at or above 75 percent. There are incremental adjustments for the calculation of earned performance shares between these minimum and maximum levels of performance.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
The Company has a supplemental, unfunded, nonqualified retirement plan, which generally vests over five-year periods beginning in 2003, pursuant to which it will pay supplemental pension benefits to key employees upon retirement. In connection with the plan, the Company has purchased cost-recovery life insurance on the lives of certain employees. Insurance contracts associated with the plan are held by trusts established as part of the plan to implement and carry out its provisions and to finance its related benefits. The trusts are owners and beneficiaries of such contracts. The amount of coverage is designed to provide sufficient revenue to cover all costs of the plan if assumptions made as to employment term, mortality experience, policy earnings and other factors are realized. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the value of the assets held in trust totaled $15.2 million and was included in “Other” assets within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following table provides the costs recognized and benefits paid for the Company’s supplemental, unfunded, nonqualified retirement plan during the three-month periods presented:
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED | |
| | MARCH 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
| | | | | |
Service costs | | $ | - | | $ | 10 | |
Interest costs | | 121 | | 214 | |
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss | | 8 | | - | |
Total costs | | $ | 129 | | $ | 224 | |
Benefits paid | | $ | 90 | | $ | - | |
The Company recognized investment gains on the cash surrender value of the insurance contracts of $135,000 and $705,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The $15.5 million and $15.4 million projected benefit obligations at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, were equal to the liabilities included in “Accrued and other liabilities” within the Consolidated Balance Sheets at those dates. The weighted-average discount rates used for the plan were 2.0 percent and 5.5 percent for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
19
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
The expected future payouts for the Company’s supplemental executive retirement plan as of March 31, 2014, are as follows: 2015—$1.5 million; 2016—$5.4 million; 2017—$1.6 million; 2018—$2.9 million; and 2019 through 2023—$3.2 million.
Note 17. Stock-Based Compensation
The Ryland Group, Inc. 2011 Equity and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) permits the granting of stock options, restricted stock awards, stock units, cash incentive awards or any combination of the foregoing to employees. Stock options granted in accordance with the Plan generally have a maximum term of seven years and vest in equal annual installments over three years. Certain outstanding stock options granted under predecessor plans have maximum terms of either five or ten years. Outstanding restricted stock units granted under the Plan or its predecessor plans generally vest in three equal annual installments and those granted to senior executives generally vest in one installment at the end of a three-year performance period. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, stock options or other awards or units available for grant under the Plan or its predecessor plans totaled 3,344,945 and 3,303,855, respectively.
The Ryland Group, Inc. 2011 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan (the “Director Plan”) provides for a stock award of 3,000 shares to each non-employee director on May 1 of each year. New non-employee directors will receive a pro rata stock award within 30 days after their date of appointment or election, based on the remaining portion of the plan year in which they are appointed or elected. Stock awards are fully vested and nonforfeitable on their applicable award dates. There were 138,830 stock awards available for future grant in accordance with the Director Plan at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Previously, The Ryland Group, Inc. 2004 Non-Employee Director Equity Plan and its predecessor plans provided for automatic grants of nonstatutory stock options to directors. These stock options are fully vested and have a maximum term of ten years.
All outstanding stock options, stock awards and restricted stock awards have been granted in accordance with the terms of the applicable Plan, Director Plan and their respective predecessor plans, all of which were approved by the Company’s stockholders. Certain option and share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the plans).
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $5.6 million and $4.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Stock-based compensation expenses have been allocated to the Company’s business units and included in “Financial services” and “Selling, general and administrative” expenses within the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
20
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
A summary of stock option activity in accordance with the Company’s equity incentive plans as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, and changes for the three-month periods then ended, follows:
| | | | | | WEIGHTED- | | | |
| | | | WEIGHTED- | | AVERAGE | | AGGREGATE | |
| | | | AVERAGE | | REMAINING | | INTRINSIC | |
| | | | EXERCISE | | CONTRACTUAL | | VALUE | |
| | SHARES | | PRICE | | LIFE (in years) | | (in thousands) | |
Options outstanding at January 1, 2013 | | 3,419,423 | | $ | 26.92 | | 2.9 | | | |
Granted | | - | | - | | | | | |
Exercised | | (340,819) | | 24.71 | | | | | |
Forfeited | | (39,089) | | 22.50 | | | | | |
Options outstanding at March 31, 2013 | | 3,039,515 | | $ | 27.23 | | 2.8 | | $ | 50,621 | |
Available for future grant | | 3,105,328 | | | | | | | |
Total shares reserved at March 31, 2013 | | 6,144,843 | | | | | | | |
Options exercisable at March 31, 2013 | | 2,303,539 | | $ | 30.17 | | 2.1 | | $ | 33,257 | |
Options outstanding at January 1, 2014 | | 2,326,201 | | $ | 27.02 | | 2.3 | | | |
Granted | | - | | - | | | | | |
Exercised | | (489,402) | | 30.32 | | | | | |
Forfeited | | (13,473) | | 22.07 | | | | | |
Options outstanding at March 31, 2014 | | 1,823,326 | | $ | 26.17 | | 2.6 | | $ | 32,057 | |
Available for future grant | | 3,344,945 | | | | | | | |
Total shares reserved at March 31, 2014 | | 5,168,271 | | | | | | | |
Options exercisable at March 31, 2014 | | 1,591,330 | | $ | 27.23 | | 2.3 | | $ | 27,184 | |
Stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options totaled $704,000 and $1.1 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
During the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the intrinsic values of stock options exercised totaled $6.9 million and $4.9 million, respectively. The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.
Compensation expense associated with restricted stock unit awards and LTIP awards to senior executives totaled $4.7 million and $3.1 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. (See Note 16, “Long-Term Incentive and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans,” for details on the LTIP.)
The following table summarizes the activity that relates to the Company’s restricted stock unit awards:
| | 2014 | | 2013 | |
Restricted stock units at January 1 | | 539,106 | | 774,217 | |
Shares awarded | | 131,597 | | 143,594 | |
Shares vested | | (298,791) | | (344,369 | ) |
Shares forfeited | | (2,428) | | (21,534 | ) |
Restricted stock units at March 31 | | 369,484 | | 551,908 | |
At March 31, 2014, the outstanding restricted stock units are expected to vest as follows: 2015—235,945; 2016—89,675; and 2017—43,864.
21
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
The Company has granted stock awards to its non-employee directors pursuant to the terms of the Director Plan. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to Director Plan stock awards in the amounts of $247,000 and $210,000 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Note 18. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
In the ordinary course of business, the Company acquires rights under option agreements to purchase land or lots for use in future homebuilding operations. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, it had cash deposits and letters of credit outstanding that totaled $72.7 million and $73.0 million, respectively, pertaining to land and lot option purchase contracts with aggregate purchase prices of $877.4 million and $869.1 million, respectively. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had $2.4 million and $2.5 million, respectively, in commitments with respect to option contracts having specific performance provisions.
IRLCs represent loan commitments with customers at market rates generally up to 180 days before settlement. During 2014 and 2013, the increasing interest rate environment resulted in loan commitments being extended up to 270 days. The Company had outstanding IRLCs with notional amounts that totaled $281.5 million and $269.2 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Hedging instruments, including forward-delivery contracts, are utilized to mitigate the risk associated with interest rate fluctuations on IRLCs.
Contingencies
As an on-site housing producer, the Company is often required by some municipalities to obtain development or performance bonds or letters of credit in support of its contractual obligations. At March 31, 2014, performance bonds totaled $150.8 million, while performance-related cash deposits and letters of credit totaled $59.4 million. At December 31, 2013, performance bonds totaled $138.9 million, while performance-related cash deposits and letters of credit totaled $64.0 million. In the event that any such bonds or letters of credit are called, the Company would be required to reimburse the issuer; it does not, however, believe that any currently outstanding bonds or letters of credit will be called.
Substantially all of the loans the Company originates are sold within a short period of time in the secondary mortgage market on a servicing-released basis. After the loans are sold, ownership, credit risk and management, including servicing of the loans, passes to the third-party investor. RMC retains no role or interest other than standard industry representations and warranties. The Company retains potential liability for possible claims by loan purchasers that it breached certain limited standard industry representations and warranties in its sale agreements. There has been an increased industrywide effort by loan purchasers to defray losses from mortgages purchased in an unfavorable economic environment by claiming to have found inaccuracies related to sellers’ representations and warranties in particular sale agreements. There is industry debate regarding the extent to which such claims are justified. A significant majority of these claims relates to loans originated in 2005, 2006 and 2007, when underwriting standards were less stringent.
22
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
The following table summarizes the composition of the Company’s mortgage loan types originated, its homebuyers’ average credit scores and its loan-to-value ratios:
| | THREE | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | MONTHS ENDED | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | MARCH 31, | | TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Prime | | 65.6 | % | 57.2 | % | 48.6 | % | 42.2 | % | 34.9 | % | 32.9 | % |
Government (FHA/VA/USDA) | | 34.4 | | 42.8 | | 51.4 | | 57.8 | | 65.1 | | 67.1 | |
Total | | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
Average FICO credit score | | 733 | | 733 | | 731 | | 726 | | 723 | | 717 | |
Average combined loan-to-value ratio | | 88.6 | % | 89.8 | % | 90.1 | % | 90.3 | % | 90.8 | % | 91.4 | % |
While the Company’s access to delinquency information is limited subsequent to loan sale, based on a review of information provided voluntarily by certain investors and on government loan reports made available by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Company believes that the average delinquency rates of RMC’s loans are generally in line with industry averages. Delinquency rates for loans originated in 2008 and subsequent years are significantly lower than those originated in 2005 through 2007. The Company primarily attributes this decrease in delinquency rates to the industrywide tightening of credit standards and the elimination of most nontraditional loan products.
The Company’s mortgage operations have established reserves for possible losses associated with mortgage loans previously originated and sold to investors based upon, among other things, actual past repurchases and losses through the disposition of affected loans; an analysis of repurchase requests received and the validity of those requests; and an estimate of potential liability for valid claims not yet received. Although the amount of an ultimate loss cannot be definitively estimated, the Company has accrued $11.3 million for these types of claims as of March 31, 2014, but it may have additional exposure. (See “Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings.”)
The following table displays the changes in the Company’s mortgage loan loss reserves and related legal reserves during the three-month periods presented:
(in thousands) | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
Balance at January 1 | | $ | 11,472 | | $ | 10,484 | |
Provision for losses | | 94 | | 543 | |
Settlements made | | (231) | | (46 | ) |
Balance at March 31 | | $ | 11,335 | | $ | 10,981 | |
Subsequent changes in conditions or available information may change assumptions and estimates. Mortgage loan loss reserves and related legal reserves were included in “Accrued and other liabilities” within the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and their associated expenses were included in “Financial services” expense within the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
The Company provides product warranties covering workmanship and materials for one year, certain mechanical systems for two years and structural systems for ten years. It estimates and records warranty liabilities based upon historical experience and known risks at the time a home closes as a component of cost of sales, as well as upon identification and quantification of its obligations in cases of unexpected claims. Actual future warranty costs could differ from current estimates.
23
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s product liability reserves during the three-month periods presented:
(in thousands) | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
Balance at January 1 | | $ | 23,139 | | $ | 18,188 | |
Warranties issued | | 1,801 | | 1,056 | |
Changes in liability for accruals related to pre-existing warranties | | (45 | ) | 393 | |
Settlements made | | (1,784 | ) | (1,249 | ) |
Balance at March 31 | | $ | 23,111 | | $ | 18,388 | |
The Company requires substantially all of its subcontractors to have workers’ compensation insurance and general liability insurance, including construction defect coverage. RHIC provided insurance services to the homebuilding segments’ subcontractors in certain markets until June 1, 2008. RHIC insurance reserves may have the effect of lowering the Company’s product liability reserves, as collectability of claims against subcontractors enrolled in the RHIC program is generally higher. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, RHIC had $15.1 million and $13.9 million, respectively, in subcontractor product liability reserves, which were included in “Accrued and other liabilities” within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Reserves for loss and loss adjustment expense are based upon industry trends and the Company’s annual actuarial projections of historical loss development.
The following table displays changes in RHIC’s insurance reserves during the three-month periods presented:
(in thousands) | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
Balance at January 1 | | $ | 13,857 | | $ | 14,813 | |
Insurance expense provisions or adjustments | | 1,900 | | - | |
Loss expenses paid | | (665 | ) | (483 | ) |
Balance at March 31 | | $ | 15,092 | | $ | 14,330 | |
Expense provisions or adjustments to RHIC’s insurance reserves were included in “Financial services” expense within the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
The Company is party to various legal proceedings generally incidental to its businesses. Litigation reserves have been established based on discussions with counsel and on the Company’s analysis of historical claims. The Company has, and requires its subcontractors to have, general liability insurance to protect it against a portion of its risk of loss and to cover it against construction-related claims. The Company establishes reserves to cover its self-insured retentions and deductible amounts under those policies.
In view of the inherent unpredictability of outcomes in legal matters, particularly where (a) damages sought are speculative, unspecified or indeterminate; (b) proceedings are in the early stages or impacted significantly by future legal determinations or judicial decisions; (c) matters involve unsettled questions of law, multiple parties, or complex facts and circumstances; or (d) insured risk transfer or coverage is undetermined, there is considerable uncertainty surrounding the timing or resolution of these matters, including a possible eventual loss. Given this inherent unpredictability, actual future litigation costs could differ from the Company’s current estimates. At the same time, the Company believes that adequate provisions have been made for the resolution of all known claims and pending litigation for probable losses. In accordance with ASC No. 450 (“ASC 450”), “Contingencies,” the Company accrues amounts for legal matters where it believes they present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. In such cases, however, the Company may be exposed to losses in excess of any amounts accrued and may occasionally need to adjust the accruals to reflect developments that could affect its estimate of potential losses. Moreover, in accordance with ASC 450, if the Company does not believe that the potential loss from a particular matter is both probable and
24
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
reasonably estimable, it does not make an accrual and will monitor the matter for any developments that would make the loss contingency both probable and reasonably estimable. For matters as to which the Company believes a loss is probable and reasonably estimable, it had legal reserves of $16.2 million and $17.2 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. (See “Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings.”) It currently estimates that the range of reasonably possible losses, in excess of amounts accrued, could be up to approximately $9 million in the aggregate.
Note 19. New Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2013-11
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-11 (“ASU 2013-11”), “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” The amendments in ASU 2013-11 are intended to end inconsistent practices regarding the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits on the balance sheet. An entity will be required to present an unrecognized tax benefit as a reduction of a deferred tax asset for an NOL or tax credit carryforward whenever the NOL or tax credit carryforward would be available to reduce the additional taxable income or tax due if the tax position is disallowed. An entity is required to apply the amendments prospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and for interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption and retrospective application are permitted. The Company’s adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2014-08
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08 (“ASU 2014-08”), “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment: Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” The amendments in ASU 2014-08 are intended to change the criteria for reporting discontinued operations and enhance convergence between U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations that has a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results should be presented as discontinued operations. Additionally, expanded disclosures about discontinued operations are required, as well as disclosure of the pretax income attributable to the disposal of a significant part of an organization that does not qualify as a discontinued operation. An entity is required to apply the amendments prospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and for interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, but only for disposals (or classifications as held-for-sale) that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available for issuance. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 20. Supplemental Guarantor Information
The Company’s obligations to pay principal, premium, if any, and interest under its 5.4 percent senior notes due January 2015; 8.4 percent senior notes due May 2017; 1.6 percent convertible senior notes due May 2018; 0.25 percent convertible senior notes due June 2019; 6.6 percent senior notes due May 2020; and 5.4 percent senior notes due October 2022 are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of its 100 percent-owned homebuilding subsidiaries (“the Guarantor Subsidiaries”). Such guarantees are full and unconditional.
In lieu of providing separate financial statements for the Guarantor Subsidiaries, the accompanying condensed consolidating financial statements have been included. Management does not believe that separate financial statements for the Guarantor Subsidiaries are material to investors and are, therefore, not presented.
In the event that a Guarantor Subsidiary is sold or disposed of (whether by merger, consolidation, sale of its capital stock, or sale of all or substantially all of its assets [other than by lease]), and whether or not the Guarantor
25
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
Subsidiary is the surviving corporation in such transaction to a Person which is not the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, such Guarantor Subsidiary will be released from its obligations under its guarantee if (a) the sale or other disposition is in compliance with the indenture and (b) all the obligations of such Guarantor Subsidiary under any agreements relating to any other indebtedness of the Company or its restricted subsidiaries terminate upon consummation of such transaction. In addition, a Guarantor Subsidiary will be released from its obligations under the indenture if such Subsidiary ceases to be a Restricted Subsidiary (in compliance with the applicable provisions of the indenture).
The following information presents the consolidating statements of earnings, financial position and cash flows for (a) the parent company and issuer, The Ryland Group, Inc. (“TRG, Inc.”); (b) the Guarantor Subsidiaries; (c) the non-Guarantor Subsidiaries; and (d) the consolidation eliminations used to arrive at the consolidated information for The Ryland Group, Inc. and subsidiaries.
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014 | |
| | | | | | NON- | | | | | |
| | | | GUARANTOR | | GUARANTOR | | CONSOLIDATING | | CONSOLIDATED | |
(in thousands) | | TRG, INC. | | SUBSIDIARIES | | SUBSIDIARIES | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL | |
REVENUES | | $ | 250,407 | $ | | 240,234 | $ | | 8,198 | $ | | (9,156 | ) $ | | 489,683 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | 228,870 | | 223,079 | | 9,609 | | (9,156 | ) | 452,402 | |
OTHER INCOME | | 695 | | 194 | | - | | - | | 889 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes | | 22,232 | | 17,349 | | (1,411 | ) | - | | 38,170 | |
Tax expense (benefit) | | 8,528 | | 6,656 | | (541 | ) | - | | 14,643 | |
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries | | 9,823 | | - | | - | | (9,823 | ) | - | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) | | $ | 23,527 | $ | | 10,693 | $ | | (870 | ) $ | | (9,823 | ) $ | | 23,527 | |
| | | |
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 | |
REVENUES | | $ | 202,298 | $ | | 169,039 | | $ | 11,179 | $ | | (7,836 | ) $ | | 374,680 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | 193,620 | | 160,831 | | 6,858 | | (7,836 | ) | 353,473 | |
OTHER INCOME | | 890 | | 106 | | - | | - | | 996 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations before taxes | | 9,568 | | 8,314 | | 4,321 | | - | | 22,203 | |
Tax expense | | 86 | | 74 | | 39 | | - | | 199 | |
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries | | 12,522 | | - | | - | | (12,522 | ) | - | |
Net income from continuing operations | | 22,004 | | 8,240 | | 4,282 | | (12,522 | ) | 22,004 | |
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes | | 113 | | 53 | | - | | (53 | ) | 113 | |
NET INCOME | | $ | 22,117 | $ | | 8,293 | $ | | 4,282 | $ | | (12,575 | ) $ | | 22,117 | |
26
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
| | | THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014 | |
| | | | | | | NON- | | | | | |
| | | | | GUARANTOR | | GUARANTOR | | CONSOLIDATING | | CONSOLIDATED | |
(in thousands) | | | TRG, INC. | | SUBSIDIARIES | | SUBSIDIARIES | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL | |
Net income (loss) | | | $ | 23,527 | | $ | 10,693 | | $ | (870 | ) | $ | (9,823 | ) | $ | 23,527 | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization of actuarial loss on defined benefit pension plan, net | | | 5 | | - | | - | | - | | 5 | |
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, available-for-sale, net | | | 188 | | - | | - | | - | | 188 | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | | 193 | | - | | - | | - | | 193 | |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | | $ | 23,720 | | $ | 10,693 | | $ | (870 | ) | $ | (9,823 | ) | $ | 23,720 | |
| | | THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 | |
Net income | | | $ | 22,117 | | $ | 8,293 | | $ | 4,282 | | $ | (12,575 | ) | $ | 22,117 | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, available-for-sale, net | | | (124 | ) | - | | - | | - | | (124 | ) |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | | (124 | ) | - | | - | | - | | (124 | ) |
Comprehensive income | | | $ | 21,993 | | $ | 8,293 | | $ | 4,282 | | $ | (12,575 | ) | $ | 21,993 | |
27
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
| | | MARCH 31, 2014 | |
| | | | | | | NON- | | | | | |
| | | | | GUARANTOR | | GUARANTOR | | CONSOLIDATING | | CONSOLIDATED | |
(in thousands) | | | TRG, INC. | | SUBSIDIARIES | | SUBSIDIARIES | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | $ | 25,732 | | $ | 224,129 | | $ | 9,292 | | $ | - | | $ | 259,153 | |
Marketable securities and restricted cash | | | 324,150 | | - | | 25,792 | | - | | 349,942 | |
Consolidated inventory owned | | | 1,030,749 | | 684,275 | | - | | - | | 1,715,024 | |
Consolidated inventory not owned | | | 17,149 | | - | | 17,320 | | - | | 34,469 | |
Total housing inventories | | | 1,047,898 | | 684,275 | | 17,320 | | - | | 1,749,493 | |
Investment in subsidiaries | | | 378,441 | | - | | - | | (378,441 | ) | - | |
Intercompany receivables | | | 515,198 | | - | | 5,139 | | (520,337 | ) | - | |
Other assets | | | 280,140 | | 53,540 | | 82,462 | | - | | 416,142 | |
Assets of discontinued operations | | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | | 2,571,559 | | 961,944 | | 140,005 | | (898,778 | ) | 2,774,730 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities | | | 221,622 | | 94,851 | | 31,881 | | - | | 348,354 | |
Financial services credit facility | | | - | | - | | 59,119 | | - | | 59,119 | |
Debt | | | 1,397,553 | | - | | - | | - | | 1,397,553 | |
Intercompany payables | | | - | | 520,337 | | - | | (520,337 | ) | - | |
Liabilities of discontinued operations | | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | | 1,619,175 | | 615,188 | | 91,000 | | (520,337 | ) | 1,805,026 | |
EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | 952,384 | | 346,756 | | 31,685 | | (378,441 | ) | 952,384 | |
NONCONTROLLING INTEREST | | | - | | - | | 17,320 | | - | | 17,320 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | $ | 2,571,559 | | $ | 961,944 | | $ | 140,005 | | $ | (898,778 | ) | $ | 2,774,730 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, 2013 | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | $ | 25,521 | | $ | 193,356 | | $ | 9,109 | | $ | - | | $ | 227,986 | |
Marketable securities and restricted cash | | | 377,267 | | - | | 25,922 | | - | | 403,189 | |
Consolidated inventory owned | | | 955,943 | | 660,664 | | - | | - | | 1,616,607 | |
Consolidated inventory not owned | | | 17,297 | | - | | 15,879 | | - | | 33,176 | |
Total housing inventories | | | 973,240 | | 660,664 | | 15,879 | | - | | 1,649,783 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment in subsidiaries | | | 369,580 | | - | | - | | (369,580 | ) | - | |
Intercompany receivables | | | 517,057 | | - | | - | | (517,057 | ) | - | |
Other assets | | | 290,153 | | 54,052 | | 155,149 | | - | | 499,354 | |
Assets of discontinued operations | | | - | | 30 | | - | | - | | 30 | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | | 2,552,818 | | 908,102 | | 206,059 | | (886,637 | ) | 2,780,342 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities | | | 247,328 | | 106,420 | | 31,773 | | - | | 385,521 | |
Financial services credit facility | | | - | | - | | 73,084 | | - | | 73,084 | |
Debt | | | 1,397,308 | | - | | - | | - | | 1,397,308 | |
Intercompany payables | | | - | | 465,252 | | 51,805 | | (517,057 | ) | - | |
Liabilities of discontinued operations | | | 136 | | 368 | | - | | - | | 504 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | | 1,644,772 | | 572,040 | | 156,662 | | (517,057 | ) | 1,856,417 | |
EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | 908,046 | | 336,062 | | 33,518 | | (369,580 | ) | 908,046 | |
NONCONTROLLING INTEREST | | | - | | - | | 15,879 | | - | | 15,879 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | $ | 2,552,818 | | $ | 908,102 | | $ | 206,059 | | $ | (886,637 | ) | $ | 2,780,342 | |
28
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| | | THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014 | |
| | | | | GUARANTOR | | NON-GUARANTOR | | CONSOLIDATING | | CONSOLIDATED | |
(in thousands) | | | TRG, INC. | | SUBSIDIARIES | | SUBSIDIARIES | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | | $ | 23,527 | | $ | 10,693 | | $ | (870 | ) | $ | (9,823 | ) | $ | 23,527 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash (used for) provided by | | | | | | | | | | | | |
operating activities | | | 8,546 | | 2,157 | | 102 | | - | | 10,805 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities | | | (104,702 | ) | (36,059 | ) | 71,734 | | 9,823 | | (59,204 | ) |
Other operating activities, net | | | (162 | ) | - | | - | | - | | (162 | ) |
Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities from continuing operations | | | (72,791 | ) | (23,209 | ) | 70,966 | | - | | (25,034 | ) |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures | | | (31 | ) | - | | - | | - | | (31 | ) |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | | | (3,596 | ) | (1,104 | ) | (4 | ) | - | | (4,704 | ) |
Purchases of marketable securities, available-for-sale | | | (118,544 | ) | - | | (800 | ) | - | | (119,344 | ) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities, available-for-sale | | | 168,212 | | - | | 1,275 | | - | | 169,487 | |
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities from continuing operations | | | 46,041 | | (1,104 | ) | 471 | | - | | 45,408 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase in debt | | | 78 | | - | | - | | - | | 78 | |
Repayments of borrowings against revolving credit facilities, net | | - | | - | | (13,965 | ) | - | | (13,965 | ) |
Common stock dividends and stock-based compensation | | | 19,899 | | - | | - | | - | | 19,899 | |
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash | | | 5,126 | | - | | (345 | ) | - | | 4,781 | |
Intercompany balances | | | 1,858 | | 55,086 | | (56,944 | ) | - | | - | |
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities from continuing operations | | | 26,961 | | 55,086 | | (71,254 | ) | - | | 10,793 | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations | | | 211 | | 30,773 | | 183 | | - | | 31,167 | |
Cash flows from operating activities–discontinued operations | | | - | | (27 | ) | - | | - | | (27 | ) |
Cash flows from investing activities–discontinued operations | | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | |
Cash flows from financing activities–discontinued operations | | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | | 25,521 | | 193,383 | | 9,109 | | - | | 228,013 | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD | | | $ | 25,732 | | $ | 224,129 | | $ | 9,292 | | $ | - | | $ | 259,153 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income from continuing operations | | | $ | 22,004 | | $ | 8,240 | | $ | 4,282 | | $ | (12,522 | ) | $ | 22,004 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income from continuing operations to net cash (used for) provided by | | | | | | | | | | | | |
operating activities | | | (1,511 | ) | 1,675 | | 45 | | - | | 209 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities | | | (39,912 | ) | (50,725 | ) | 47,875 | | 12,522 | | (30,240 | ) |
Other operating activities, net | | | (197 | ) | - | | - | | - | | (197 | ) |
Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities from continuing operations | | | (19,616 | ) | (40,810 | ) | 52,202 | | - | | (8,224 | ) |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Return of investment in unconsolidated joint ventures, net | | | 165 | | - | | - | | - | | 165 | |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | | | (1,992 | ) | (1,613 | ) | (214 | ) | - | | (3,819 | ) |
Purchases of marketable securities, available-for-sale | | | (179,915 | ) | - | | (1,050 | ) | - | | (180,965 | ) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities, available-for-sale | | | 204,843 | | - | | 1,424 | | - | | 206,267 | |
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities from continuing operations | | | 23,101 | | (1,613 | ) | 160 | | - | | 21,648 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Decrease in debt | | | (1,462 | ) | - | | - | | - | | (1,462 | ) |
Common stock dividends and stock-based compensation | | | 13,095 | | - | | - | | - | | 13,095 | |
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash | | | (977 | ) | - | | 266 | | - | | (711 | ) |
Intercompany balances | | | (22,857 | ) | 74,371 | | (51,514 | ) | - | | - | |
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities from continuing operations | | | (12,201 | ) | 74,371 | | (51,248 | ) | - | | 10,922 | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations | | | (8,716 | ) | 31,948 | | 1,114 | | - | | 24,346 | |
Cash flows from operating activities–discontinued operations | | | - | | (15 | ) | - | | - | | (15 | ) |
Cash flows from investing activities–discontinued operations | | | - | | 15 | | - | | - | | 15 | |
Cash flows from financing activities–discontinued operations | | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | | 32,130 | | 117,865 | | 8,119 | | - | | 158,114 | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD | | | $ | 23,414 | | $ | 149,813 | | $ | 9,233 | | $ | - | | $ | 182,460 | |
29
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
Note 21. Transactions with Affiliates
During 2013, the Company issued $1.5 million of promissory notes to affiliates of the Company’s Philadelphia division for the development and sale of land and lots. These notes will be repaid once each lot and home is sold, and no later than within three years of their issuance. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the balances of the promissory notes from these affiliates totaled $364,000 and $1.3 million, respectively. Additionally, the Company leases office space from affiliates in its Philadelphia and Phoenix divisions at market terms.
Note 22. Subsequent Event
During April 2014, RMCMC entered into a $50.0 million warehouse line of credit with Comerica Bank, which will expire in April 2015. This facility is used to fund, and is secured by, mortgages that were originated by RMCMC and are pending sale. Under the terms of this facility, RMCMC is required to maintain various financial and other covenants and to satisfy certain requirements relating to the mortgages securing the facility.
30
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of |
| Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following management’s discussion and analysis is intended to assist the reader in understanding the Company’s business and is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company’s results of operations discussed below are presented in conformity with GAAP.
Forward-Looking Statements
Note: Certain statements in this quarterly report may be regarded as “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and may qualify for the safe harbor provided for in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements represent the Company’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events, and no assurance can be given that the results described in this quarterly report will be achieved. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of statements that include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “foresee,” “goal,” “intend,” “likely,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will” or other similar words or phrases. All forward-looking statements contained herein are based upon information available to the Company on the date of this quarterly report. Except as may be required under applicable law, the Company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of the Company’s control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. The factors and assumptions upon which any forward-looking statements herein are based are subject to risks and uncertainties which include, among others:
· economic changes nationally or in the Company’s local markets, including volatility and increases in interest rates, the impact of, and changes in, governmental stimulus, tax and deficit reduction programs, inflation, changes in consumer demand and confidence levels and the state of the market for homes in general;
· changes and developments in the mortgage lending market, including revisions to underwriting standards for borrowers and lender requirements for originating and holding mortgages, changes in government support of and participation in such market, and delays or changes in terms and conditions for the sale of mortgages originated by the Company;
· the availability and cost of land and the future value of land held or under development;
· increased land development costs on projects under development;
· shortages of skilled labor or raw materials used in the production of homes;
· increased prices for labor, land and materials used in the production of homes;
· increased competition;
· failure to anticipate or react to changing consumer preferences in home design;
· increased costs and delays in land development or home construction resulting from adverse weather conditions or other factors;
· potential delays or increased costs in obtaining necessary permits as a result of changes to laws, regulations or governmental policies (including those that affect zoning, density, building standards, the environment and the residential mortgage industry);
· delays in obtaining approvals from applicable regulatory agencies and others in connection with the Company’s communities and land activities;
· changes in the Company’s effective tax rate and assumptions and valuations related to its tax accounts;
· the risk factors set forth in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K; and
· other factors over which the Company has little or no control.
31
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of |
| Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Results of Operations
Overview
The Company consists of six reportable segments: four geographically determined homebuilding regions; financial services; and corporate. All of the Company’s business is conducted and located in the United States. The Company’s operations span all significant aspects of the homebuying process—from design, construction and sale to mortgage origination, title and escrow services. The homebuilding operations are, by far, the most substantial part of its business, comprising approximately 98 percent of consolidated revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. The homebuilding segments generate nearly all of their revenues from sales of completed homes, with a lesser amount from sales of land and lots.
In the first quarter of 2014, the Company continued to experience slow and steady improvement in fundamental housing conditions in most of its markets. In the Company’s Midwest and Mid-Atlantic markets, however, severe weather conditions impacted its ability to sell and build homes, particularly early on in the quarter. Traffic, sales volumes and accessibility to sites in those regions improved dramatically in March 2014, and the normal selling season backdrop appeared to have emerged. On average, a decline in the number of distressed properties for sale, a general tightening in the supply of housing inventory and a resulting return to more traditional sales incentives have allowed the Company to continue to raise prices in most of its markets. It reported increases of 6.6 percent in sales volume and 6.6 percent in backlog for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013. The Company’s strategic homebuilding initiatives have continued to generate growth in selling communities, efficiencies and increased profitability. High unemployment levels, a tight mortgage environment and tepid economic improvements on a national level, however, continue to impact the homebuilding industry by keeping sales absorption rates per community below levels historically seen during more robust housing recoveries.
Although rates of improvement in the Company’s housing markets may moderate and prices may not continue to increase at rates seen in 2013, it believes that housing demand as a whole is likely to continue to rise over an extended period of time due to a general improvement in overall economic and employment levels; historically low interest rates; attractive housing affordability levels; slow relaxation of the mortgage underwriting environment; low production of single-family homes during the recent recession that resulted in low supplies of new and existing inventories; and a steady increase of potential buyers due, in part, to an expected rise in the number of household formations. If mortgage interest rates continue to increase, the Company believes that they will likely be accompanied by improvements in economic conditions, which should mitigate the impact on demand. Healthy, more moderate sales rates should then facilitate a more sustainable long-term recovery.
The Company believes that continued revenue growth and improved financial performance will come from a greater presence in its established markets and from its entry into new markets, as well as from a return to more traditional absorption rates in its communities, which will be made possible by economic stability and growth. The Company also believes that its strategic goals of increasing profitability and leverage through expansion within existing markets and diversification will position it to take full advantage of that housing recovery.
The Company made significant progress in achieving its operational goals during the first quarter of 2014 with a 30.7 percent increase in consolidated revenues; a 1.7 percent rise in housing gross profit margin; and a 0.9 percent decline in the selling, general and administrative expense ratio, all of which led to a decisive increase in homebuilding operations profitability, compared to the same period in the prior year. The number of active communities rose 18.8 percent to 297 active communities at March 31, 2014, from 250 active communities at March 31, 2013. Significant ongoing land acquisitions in its existing markets should enhance the Company’s ability to establish additional market penetration and create a platform for future growth. Investments in new
32
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of |
| Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
communities increased consolidated inventory owned by $98.3 million, or 6.0 percent, at March 31, 2014, compared to December 31, 2013.
The Company’s pretax earnings from continuing operations increased by 71.9 percent to $38.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, from $22.2 million for the same period in 2013. The increase in pretax earnings for the first quarter of 2014, compared to same period in 2013, was primarily due to a rise in closing volume; higher housing gross profit margin; a reduced selling, general and administrative expense ratio; and a decline in interest expense. Net income from continuing operations totaled $23.5 million, or $0.42 per diluted share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, compared to $22.0 million, or $0.43 per diluted share, for the same period in 2013. The increase in net income was lower than the rise in pretax earnings due to the reversal of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance in 2013, which restored income tax expense in 2014. Pretax charges primarily related to preacquisition feasibility cost write-offs totaled $618,000 and $213,000 for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company continued to raise gross margins during the first quarter of 2014 by investing in new communities, selectively increasing prices, completing less profitable communities and lowering expense ratios.
The Company’s consolidated revenues increased 30.7 percent to $489.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, from $374.7 million for the same period in 2013. This increase was primarily attributable to an 18.1 percent higher average closing price and to a 12.5 percent rise in closings. The increase in average closing price was due to a more accommodating price environment, as well as to a change in the product and geographic mix of homes delivered during the first quarter of 2014, versus the same period in 2013. Revenues for the homebuilding and financial services segments totaled $481.5 million and $8.2 million, respectively, for the first quarter of 2014, compared to $363.5 million and $11.2 million, respectively, for the first quarter of 2013.
The Company reported a rise in closing volume for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, primarily due to an increase in sales. New orders rose 6.6 percent to 2,186 units for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, from 2,051 units for the same period in 2013 primarily due to an increase in the number of active communities, partially offset by a lower average monthly sales absorption rate of 2.5 homes per community for the first quarter of 2014, versus 2.8 homes per community for the first quarter of 2013. New order dollars increased 20.5 percent for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013. The Company’s average monthly sales absorption rate is calculated as the net new orders in the period divided by the average number of active communities during the period divided by the number of months in that period.
Selling, general and administrative expense totaled 13.0 percent of homebuilding revenues for the first quarter of 2014, compared to 13.9 percent for the same period in 2013. This decrease was primarily attributable to higher leverage that resulted from increased revenues.
The Company’s financial services segment reported a pretax loss of $1.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, compared to pretax earnings of $4.3 million for the same period in 2013. This decrease was a result of extremely competitive conditions existing in the mortgage origination industry during the quarter and increases in actuarial estimates of losses within its captive insurance company.
The Company maintained a strong balance sheet, ending the quarter with $609.1 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. The Company’s earliest senior debt maturity is in 2015. Its net debt-to-capital ratio, including marketable securities, was 45.3 percent at March 31, 2014, compared to 45.8 percent at December 31, 2013. Stockholders’ equity increased sequentially by 4.9 percent, and stockholders’ equity per share rose 3.5 percent to $20.32 at March 31, 2014, compared to $19.64 at December 31, 2013.
The net debt-to-capital ratio, including marketable securities, is a non-GAAP financial measure that is calculated as debt, net of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, divided by the sum of debt and total
33
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of |
| Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
stockholders’ equity, net of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. The Company believes that the net debt-to-capital ratio, including marketable securities, is useful in understanding the leverage employed in its operations and in comparing it with other homebuilders.
Homebuilding Overview
The Company’s homes are built on-site and marketed in four major geographic regions, or segments: North, Southeast, Texas and West. Within each of those segments, the Company operated in the following metropolitan areas at March 31, 2014:
North | | Baltimore, Chicago, Delaware, Indianapolis, Metro Washington, D.C., Minneapolis, New Jersey, Northern Virginia and Philadelphia |
Southeast | | Atlanta, Charleston, Charlotte, Myrtle Beach, Orlando, Raleigh/Durham and Tampa |
Texas | | Austin, Dallas, Houston and San Antonio |
West | | Denver, Las Vegas, Phoenix and Southern California |
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED | |
| | MARCH 31, | |
(in thousands, except units) | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
REVENUES | | | | | | |
Housing | | $ | 480,641 | | | $ | 361,386 | |
Land and other | | 844 | | | 2,115 | |
TOTAL REVENUES | | 481,485 | | | 363,501 | |
| | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | | | | | |
Housing | | 379,312 | | | 291,167 | |
Land and other | | 687 | | | 1,169 | |
Total cost of sales | | 379,999 | | | 292,336 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 55,260 | | | 43,930 | |
Interest | | - | | | 3,762 | |
TOTAL EXPENSES | | 435,259 | | | 340,028 | |
| | | | | | |
PRETAX EARNINGS | | $ | 46,226 | | | $ | 23,473 | |
Closings (units) | | 1,470 | | | 1,307 | |
Housing gross profit margin | | 21.1 | % | | 19.4 | % |
Selling, general and administrative ratio | | 11.5 | % | | 12.1 | % |
Three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to three months ended March 31, 2013
The homebuilding segments reported pretax earnings of $46.2 million for the first quarter of 2014, compared to pretax earnings of $23.5 million for the same period in 2013. This improvement in homebuilding results was primarily due to a rise in closing volume; higher housing gross profit margin; a reduced selling, general and administrative expense ratio; and a decline in interest expense.
Homebuilding revenues increased 32.5 percent to $481.5 million for the first quarter of 2014 from $363.5 million for the same period in 2013 primarily due to an 18.1 percent higher average closing price and to a 12.5 percent rise in closings. The increase in average closing price was due to a more accommodating price environment, as well as to a change in the product and geographic mix of homes delivered during the first quarter of 2014, versus the same period in 2013. The increase in closings was due to a 6.6 percent rise in new orders during the first quarter of 2014, versus the same period in 2013. Homebuilding revenues for the first quarter of 2014 included $844,000 from land sales, which resulted in pretax earnings of $157,000, compared to homebuilding revenues for the first quarter of 2013 that included $2.1 million from land sales, which resulted in pretax earnings of $946,000.
34
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of |
| Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Housing gross profit margin for the first quarter of 2014 was 21.1 percent, compared to 19.4 percent for the same period in 2013. This improvement was primarily attributable to a relative decline in direct construction costs of 2.2 percent, partially offset by increased land costs of 0.3 percent and higher weather-related costs of 0.2 percent. Gross profit margin from land sales was 18.6 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to 44.7 percent for the same period in 2013. Fluctuations in revenues and gross profit percentages from land sales are a product of local market conditions and changing land portfolios. The Company generally purchases land and lots with the intent to build homes on those lots and sell them; however, it occasionally sells a portion of its land to other homebuilders or third parties.
The homebuilding segments’ selling, general and administrative expense ratio totaled 11.5 percent of homebuilding revenues for the first quarter of 2014, compared to 12.1 percent for the same period in 2013. This decrease was primarily attributable to higher leverage resulting from increased revenues.
Interest, which was incurred principally to finance land acquisitions, land development and home construction, totaled $17.1 million and $16.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The homebuilding segments recorded no interest expense during the first quarter of 2014, compared to $3.8 million of interest expense during the same period in 2013. This decrease in interest expense from the first quarter of 2013 was primarily due to the capitalization of a greater amount of interest incurred during the first quarter of 2014, which resulted from a higher level of inventory under development. (See Note 9, “Housing Inventories.”)
Consolidated inventory owned by the Company, which includes homes under construction; land under development and improved lots; inventory held-for-sale; and cash deposits related to consolidated inventory not owned, rose 6.0 percent to $1.7 billion at March 31, 2014, from $1.6 billion at December 31, 2013. Homes under construction increased 15.2 percent to $741.3 million at March 31, 2014, from $643.4 million at December 31, 2013, as a result of higher backlog. The Company had 389 model homes with inventory values totaling $107.6 million at March 31, 2014, compared to 370 model homes with inventory values totaling $99.3 million at December 31, 2013. In addition, it had 984 started and unsold homes with inventory values totaling $187.6 million at March 31, 2014, compared to 977 started and unsold homes with inventory values totaling $196.2 million at December 31, 2013.
The following table provides certain information with respect to the Company’s number of residential communities and lots under development at March 31, 2014:
| | COMMUNITIES | | | |
| | | | NEW AND | | | | HELD- | | | | TOTAL LOTS | |
| | ACTIVE | | NOT YET OPEN | | INACTIVE | | FOR-SALE | | TOTAL | | CONTROLLED | 1 |
North | | 93 | | 63 | | 7 | | 1 | | 164 | | 14,019 | |
Southeast | | 89 | | 51 | | 11 | | 7 | | 158 | | 11,324 | |
Texas | | 76 | | 47 | | - | | 2 | | 125 | | 7,297 | |
West | | 39 | | 47 | | - | | - | | 86 | | 6,842 | |
Total | | 297 | | 208 | | 18 | | 10 | | 533 | | 39,482 | |
1 Includes lots controlled through the Company’s investments in joint ventures.
Inactive communities consist of projects either under development or on hold for future home sales. At March 31, 2014, of the 10 communities that were held-for-sale, 7 communities had fewer than 20 lots remaining.
Favorable affordability levels and the appearance of recovery in most housing submarkets have allowed the Company to focus on growing inventory and increasing profitability, all while balancing those two objectives with cash preservation. Increasing community count is among the Company’s greatest challenges and highest priorities. During the quarter ended March 31, 2014, it secured 3,833 owned or optioned lots, opened 42 communities and closed 35 communities. The Company operated from 18.8 percent more active communities at March 31, 2014, than it did at March 31, 2013. The number of lots controlled was 38,854 lots at March 31, 2014, compared to 38,142 lots at December 31, 2013. Optioned lots, as a percentage of total lots controlled, were 36.5
35
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of |
| Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
percent and 38.3 percent at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. In addition, the Company controlled 628 lots under joint venture agreements at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
The following table provides a summary of results for the homebuilding segments for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(in thousands) | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
NORTH | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 133,564 | | $ | 95,682 | |
Expenses | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | 107,400 | | 79,115 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 15,370 | | 11,568 | |
Interest | | - | | 1,660 | |
Total expenses | | 122,770 | | 92,343 | |
Pretax earnings | | $ | 10,794 | | $ | 3,339 | |
Housing gross profit margin | | 19.6 | % | 17.3 | % |
SOUTHEAST | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 126,667 | | $ | 105,219 | |
Expenses | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | 97,034 | | 84,235 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 14,776 | | 12,861 | |
Interest | | - | | 918 | |
Total expenses | | 111,810 | | 98,014 | |
Pretax earnings | | $ | 14,857 | | $ | 7,205 | |
Housing gross profit margin | | 23.4 | % | 19.7 | % |
TEXAS | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 111,151 | | $ | 77,337 | |
Expenses | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | 89,642 | | 61,840 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 13,662 | | 9,954 | |
Interest | | - | | 520 | |
Total expenses | | 103,304 | | 72,314 | |
Pretax earnings | | $ | 7,847 | | $ | 5,023 | |
Housing gross profit margin | | 19.4 | % | 20.1 | % |
WEST | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 110,103 | | $ | 85,263 | |
Expenses | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | 85,923 | | 67,146 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 11,452 | | 9,547 | |
Interest | | - | | 664 | |
Total expenses | | 97,375 | | 77,357 | |
Pretax earnings | | $ | 12,728 | | $ | 7,906 | |
Housing gross profit margin | | 22.0 | % | 21.0 | % |
TOTAL | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 481,485 | | $ | 363,501 | |
Expenses | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | 379,999 | | 292,336 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 55,260 | | 43,930 | |
Interest | | - | | 3,762 | |
Total expenses | | 435,259 | | 340,028 | |
Pretax earnings | | $ | 46,226 | | $ | 23,473 | |
Housing gross profit margin | | 21.1 | % | 19.4 | % |
36
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of |
| Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to three months ended March 31, 2013
North—Homebuilding revenues increased 39.6 percent to $133.6 million in 2014 from $95.7 million in 2013 primarily due to a 29.3 percent rise in the number of homes delivered and to a 7.9 percent increase in average closing price. The rise in the number of homes delivered was most impacted by the Chicago market and by the Company’s entry into the Philadelphia market during 2013. The increase in average closing price was primarily attributable to the Baltimore and Indianapolis markets. Gross profit margin on home sales was 19.6 percent in 2014, compared to 17.3 percent in 2013. This improvement was primarily due to decreased land costs of 2.1 percent and to a relative decline in direct construction costs of 0.5 percent, partially offset by higher weather-related costs of 0.5 percent. As a result, the North region generated pretax earnings of $10.8 million in 2014, compared to pretax earnings of $3.3 million in 2013.
Southeast—Homebuilding revenues increased 20.4 percent to $126.7 million in 2014 from $105.2 million in 2013 primarily due to an 18.8 percent rise in average closing price and to a 1.6 percent increase in the number of homes delivered. The rise in average closing price was broad-based across all markets, with the largest contributions coming from the Charleston and Tampa markets. Gross profit margin on home sales was 23.4 percent in 2014, compared to 19.7 percent in 2013. This improvement was primarily due to a relative decline in direct construction costs of 2.7 percent and to lower land costs of 1.2 percent. As a result, the Southeast region generated pretax earnings of $14.9 million in 2014, compared to pretax earnings of $7.2 million in 2013.
Texas—Homebuilding revenues increased 43.7 percent to $111.2 million in 2014 from $77.3 million in 2013 primarily due to a 29.5 percent rise in the number of homes delivered and to an 11.3 percent increase in average closing price. The rise in the number of homes delivered was primarily attributable to the Company’s re-entry into the Dallas market during 2013. The increase in average closing price was broad-based across all markets, with the largest contribution coming from the Houston market. Gross profit margin on home sales was 19.4 percent in 2014, compared to 20.1 percent in 2013. This decrease was primarily due to a relative increase in direct construction costs of 0.5 percent and to higher land costs of 0.4 percent. As a result, the Texas region generated pretax earnings of $7.8 million in 2014, compared to pretax earnings of $5.0 million in 2013.
West—Homebuilding revenues increased 29.1 percent to $110.1 million in 2014 from $85.3 million in 2013 primarily due to a 41.2 percent rise in average closing price, partially offset by a 7.4 percent decrease in the number of homes delivered. The increase in average closing price was broad-based across all markets, with the largest contributions coming from the Southern California and Las Vegas markets. The decrease in the number of homes delivered was most impacted by the Las Vegas market. Gross profit margin on home sales was 22.0 percent in 2014, compared to 21.0 percent in 2013. This improvement was primarily due to a relative decline in direct construction costs of 6.0 percent, partially offset by higher land costs of 4.7 percent. As a result, the West region generated pretax earnings of $12.7 million in 2014, compared to pretax earnings of $7.9 million in 2013.
37
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of |
| Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Closings
The following table provides the Company’s closings and average closing prices for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | % CHG | |
UNITS | | | | | | | |
North | | 424 | | 328 | | 29.3 | % |
Southeast | | 446 | | 439 | | 1.6 | |
Texas | | 351 | | 271 | | 29.5 | |
West | | 249 | | 269 | | (7.4) | |
Total | | 1,470 | | 1,307 | | 12.5 | % |
| | | | | | | |
AVERAGE PRICE (in thousands) | | | | | | | |
North | | $ | 314 | | $ | 291 | | 7.9 | % |
Southeast | | 284 | | 239 | | 18.8 | |
Texas | | 316 | | 284 | | 11.3 | |
West | | 442 | | 313 | | 41.2 | |
Total | | $ | 327 | | $ | 277 | | 18.1 | % |
New Orders
New orders increased 6.6 percent to 2,186 units for the first quarter of 2014 from 2,051 units for the same period in 2013, and new order dollars rose 20.5 percent for the first quarter of 2014, compared to the same period in 2013. The overall increase in new orders was primarily due to an 18.8 percent rise in active communities, partially offset by lower sales rates. The Company’s Raleigh, Denver and Phoenix markets had the largest increases in new orders. Additionally, the Company’s entry into Philadelphia and re-entry into Dallas during 2013 contributed to its overall increase in new orders for the first quarter of 2014, compared to the same period in 2013. New orders for the first quarter of 2014 declined 4.7 percent in the North, compared to the same period in 2013, primarily due to lower sales rates from severe weather, partially offset by an increase in the number of active communities. New orders for the first quarter of 2014 declined 9.8 percent in the Southeast, compared to the same period in 2013, primarily due to lower sales rates in the Florida markets, partially offset by a slight increase in the number of active communities. New orders for the first quarter of 2014 rose 30.3 percent in Texas, compared to the same period in 2013, primarily due to an increase in the number of active communities. New orders for the first quarter of 2014 rose 36.5 percent in the West, compared to the same period in 2013, primarily due to an increase in the number of active communities and to higher sales rates. The Company’s average monthly sales absorption rate was 2.5 homes per community for the first quarter of 2014, versus 2.8 homes per community for the same period in 2013.
The following table provides the number of the Company’s active communities at March 31, 2014 and 2013:
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | % CHG | |
North | | 93 | | 71 | | 31.0 | % |
Southeast | | 89 | | 85 | | 4.7 | |
Texas | | 76 | | 66 | | 15.2 | |
West | | 39 | | 28 | | 39.3 | |
Total | | 297 | | 250 | | 18.8 | % |
The Company experiences seasonal variations in its quarterly operating results and capital requirements. Historically, new order activity is higher in the spring and summer months. As a result, the Company typically has more homes under construction, closes more homes, and has greater revenues and operating income in the third and fourth quarters of its fiscal year. Historical results, however, are not necessarily indicative of current or future homebuilding activities.
38
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of |
| Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following table provides the Company’s new orders (units and aggregate sales values) for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | % CHG | |
UNITS | | | | | | | |
North | | 610 | | 640 | | (4.7) | % |
Southeast | | 635 | | 704 | | (9.8) | |
Texas | | 507 | | 389 | | 30.3 | |
West | | 434 | | 318 | | 36.5 | |
Total | | 2,186 | | 2,051 | | 6.6 | % |
| | | | | | | |
DOLLARS (in millions) | | | | | | | |
North | | $ | 190 | | $ | 192 | | (0.9) | % |
Southeast | | 192 | | 177 | | 7.9 | |
Texas | | 165 | | 117 | | 41.1 | |
West | | 182 | | 119 | | 53.8 | |
Total | | $ | 729 | | $ | 605 | | 20.5 | % |
The following table provides the Company’s cancellation rates, defined as cancelled orders divided by gross new orders, for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | % CHG | |
North | | 14.1 | % | 13.7 | % | 0.4 | % |
Southeast | | 14.8 | | 14.6 | | 0.2 | |
Texas | | 17.2 | | 18.6 | | (1.4) | |
West | | 15.7 | | 16.5 | | (0.8) | |
Total | | 15.3 | % | 15.4 | % | (0.1) | % |
In the North, the largest cancellation rate increase occurred in the Baltimore market, partially offset by lower cancellations in the Indianapolis market. In the Southeast, the largest cancellation rate increase occurred in the Orlando market, partially offset by lower cancellations in the Raleigh market. In Texas, the cancellation rate declined the most in the San Antonio market, partially offset by an increase in cancellations in the Houston market. In the West, the cancellation rate declined the most in the Denver market, partially offset by an increase in cancellations in the Southern California market.
The following table provides the Company’s sales incentives and price concessions (average dollar value per unit closed and percentage of revenues) for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:
| | | | 2014 | | | | 2013 | |
| | AVG $ | | % OF | | AVG $ | | % OF | |
(in thousands) | | PER UNIT | | REVENUES | | PER UNIT | | REVENUES | |
North | | $ | 17 | | 5.1 | % | $ | 20 | | 6.6 | % |
Southeast | | 20 | | 6.6 | | 22 | | 8.5 | |
Texas | | 32 | | 9.2 | | 39 | | 12.1 | |
West | | 21 | | 4.6 | | 14 | | 4.3 | |
Total | | $ | 22 | | 6.4 | % | $ | 23 | | 7.9 | % |
39
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of |
| Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Outstanding Contracts
Outstanding contracts denote the Company’s backlog of homes sold, but not closed, which are generally built and closed, subject to cancellations, over the subsequent two quarters. At March 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding contracts for 3,342 units, representing a 27.3 percent rise from 2,626 units at December 31, 2013, and a 6.6 percent rise from 3,135 units at March 31, 2013. The $1.1 billion value of outstanding contracts at March 31, 2014, represented a 21.7 percent increase from the $907.1 million value of outstanding contracts at March 31, 2013.
The following table provides the Company’s outstanding contracts (units, aggregate dollar values and average prices) at March 31, 2014 and 2013:
| | | | | | 2014 | | | | | | 2013 | |
| | | | | | AVERAGE | | | | | | AVERAGE | |
| | | | DOLLARS | | PRICE | | | | DOLLARS | | PRICE | |
| | UNITS | | (in millions) | | (in thousands) | | UNITS | | (in millions) | | (in thousands) | |
North | | 1,018 | | $ | 324 | | $ | 318 | | 931 | | $ | 285 | | $ | 306 | |
Southeast | | 991 | | 298 | | 301 | | 1,146 | | 284 | | 247 | |
Texas | | 770 | | 252 | | 328 | | 595 | | 175 | | 294 | |
West | | 563 | | 230 | | 407 | | 463 | | 163 | | 353 | |
Total | | 3,342 | | $ | 1,104 | | $ | 330 | | 3,135 | | $ | 907 | | $ | 289 | |
At March 31, 2014, the Company anticipates that approximately 46 percent of its outstanding contracts will close during the second quarter of 2014, subject to cancellations.
Impairments
Inventory is reviewed for potential write-downs on an ongoing basis. ASC 360 requires that, in the event that impairment indicators are present and undiscounted cash flows signify that the carrying amount of an asset is not recoverable, impairment charges must be recorded if the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount. No communities were impaired during the first quarters of 2014 and 2013. (See Note 9, “Housing Inventories.”)
The Company periodically writes off earnest money deposits and preacquisition feasibility costs related to land and lot option purchase contracts that it no longer plans to pursue. During the first quarter of 2014, the Company wrote off $8,000 and $610,000 of earnest money deposits and preacquisition feasibility costs, respectively. During the first quarter of 2013, the Company recovered $15,000 of earnest money deposits and wrote off $218,000 of preacquisition feasibility costs. Should homebuilding market conditions weaken or the Company be unsuccessful in renegotiating certain land option purchase contracts, it may write off additional earnest money deposits and preacquisition feasibility costs in future periods.
Financial Services
The Company’s financial services segment provides mortgage-related products and services, as well as title and escrow services, to its homebuyers. By aligning its operations with the Company’s homebuilding segments, the financial services segment leverages this relationship to offer its lending services to homebuyers. Providing mortgage financing and other services to its customers helps the Company monitor its backlog and closing process. The mortgage capture rate represents the percentage of homes closed and available to capture by the Company that were financed with mortgage loans obtained from RMC. Substantially all of the loans the Company originates are sold within a short period of time in the secondary mortgage market on a servicing-released basis. The third-party investor then services and manages the loans. The fair values of the Company’s mortgage loans held-for-sale totaled $69.0 million and $139.6 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
40
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of |
| Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED | |
| | | | MARCH 31, | |
(in thousands, except units) | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
REVENUES | | | | | |
Income from origination and sale of mortgage loans, net | | $ | 5,640 | | $ | 8,986 | |
Title, escrow and insurance | | 1,897 | | 1,762 | |
Interest and other | | 661 | | 431 | |
TOTAL REVENUES | | 8,198 | | 11,179 | |
EXPENSES | | 9,609 | | 6,858 | |
PRETAX (LOSS) EARNINGS | | $ | (1,411) | | $ | 4,321 | |
Originations (units) | | 704 | | 714 | |
Ryland Homes origination capture rate | | 60.2 | % | 62.4 | % |
Three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to three months ended March 31, 2013
For the three months ended March 31, 2014, the financial services segment reported a pretax loss of $1.4 million, compared to pretax earnings of $4.3 million for the same period in 2013. Revenues for the financial services segment decreased 26.7 percent to $8.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to $11.2 million for the same period in 2013. This decline in revenues for the first quarter of 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, was primarily due to a decrease in secondary net gain percentage that resulted from the existence of highly competitive conditions in most markets and to a decline in the locked loan pipeline, which was due to the reversal of the accelerated timing of loan locks during 2013, partially offset by a rise in origination volume and title income. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, financial services expense rose 40.1 percent to $9.6 million, versus $6.9 million for the same period in 2013. This increase in expense for the first quarter of 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, was primarily attributable to higher expense related to estimates of ultimate insurance loss liability and to a rise in personnel costs. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the capture rates of mortgages originated for customers of the Company’s homebuilding operations were 60.2 percent and 62.4 percent, respectively.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets are recognized for estimated tax effects that are attributable to deductible temporary differences and tax carryforwards related to tax credits and NOLs. They are realized when existing temporary differences are carried back to a profitable year(s) and/or carried forward to a future year(s) having taxable income. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if an assessment of their components indicates that it is more likely than not that all or some portion of these assets will not be realized. In the assessment for a valuation allowance, appropriate consideration is given to all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative losses; actual earnings; forecasts of future earnings; the duration of statutory carryforward periods; the Company’s experience with NOL carryforwards not expiring unused; and tax planning alternatives.
At June 30, 2013, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that its deferred tax assets would be realized, which resulted in a $187.5 million reversal of the valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, which was calculated on an annual basis, during the second quarter of 2013. After this reversal, the Company had a valuation allowance of $46.4 million against its deferred tax assets, which represented an estimation of the allowance required for the second half of 2013. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had no valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.
41
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of |
| Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Financial Condition and Liquidity
The Company has historically funded its homebuilding and financial services operations with cash flows from operating activities; the issuance of new debt securities; and borrowings under a repurchase credit facility. In light of current market conditions, the Company is focused on maintaining a strong balance sheet by generating cash from existing communities and by extending debt maturities when market conditions are favorable, as well as by investing in new communities to facilitate continued growth and profitability. As a result of this strategy, the Company opened 42 new communities during the first quarter of 2014; has senior debt maturities ranging from 2015 to 2022; and ended the quarter with $609.1 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.
Consolidated inventory owned by the Company increased 6.0 percent to $1.7 billion at March 31, 2014, compared to $1.6 billion at December 31, 2013. The Company is currently attempting to grow at an accelerated rate and strives to maintain a projected three- to four-year supply of land, assuming historically normalized sales rates. At March 31, 2014, it controlled 38,854 lots, with 24,668 lots owned and 14,186 lots, or 36.5 percent, under option. Lots controlled increased 1.9 percent at March 31, 2014, from 38,142 lots controlled at December 31, 2013. The Company also controlled 628 lots under joint venture agreements at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. (See Note 9, “Housing Inventories,” and Note 12, “Investments in Joint Ventures.”)
At March 31, 2014, the Company’s net debt-to-capital ratio, including marketable securities, decreased to 45.3 percent from 45.8 percent at December 31, 2013. The Company remains focused on maintaining its liquidity so that it can be flexible in reacting to changing market conditions.
During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company used $25.0 million of cash for operating activities from continuing operations, which included cash outflows related to a $100.2 million increase in inventories, partially offset by cash inflows of $34.3 million from current period net income and $40.9 million from changes in assets, liabilities and other operating activities. Investing activities from continuing operations provided $45.4 million, which included cash inflows of $50.1 million related to net investments in marketable securities, partially offset by cash outflows of $4.7 million related to property, plant and equipment and $31,000 related to contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures. Financing activities from continuing operations provided $10.8 million, which included cash inflows of $21.3 million from the issuance of common stock under stock-based compensation, a decrease of $4.8 million in restricted cash and a $78,000 net increase in short-term borrowings, partially offset by cash outflows related to a $14.0 million net repayment against the Company’s repurchase credit facility and to payments of $1.4 million for dividends. Net cash provided by continuing operations during the quarter ended March 31, 2014, totaled $31.2 million.
Dividends declared totaled $0.03 per share for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2014, borrowing arrangements for the homebuilding segments included senior notes, convertible senior notes and nonrecourse secured notes payable. Senior notes outstanding, net of discount, totaled $1.4 billion at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Senior notes and indenture agreements are subject to certain covenants that include, among other things, restrictions on additional secured debt and the sale of assets. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at March 31, 2014.
The Company’s obligations to pay principal, premium and interest under its senior notes and convertible senior notes are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of its Guarantor Subsidiaries. Such guarantees are full and unconditional. (See Note 20, “Supplemental Guarantor Information.”)
42
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of |
| Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
During April 2014, RMCMC entered into a $50.0 million warehouse line of credit with Comerica Bank, which will expire in April 2015. This facility is used to fund, and is secured by, mortgages that were originated by RMCMC and are pending sale. Under the terms of this facility, RMCMC is required to maintain various financial and other covenants and to satisfy certain requirements relating to the mortgages securing the facility.
During 2011, RMC entered into a $50.0 million repurchase credit facility with JPM, which was subsequently increased to $100.0 million during the first quarter of 2014 and will expire in December 2014. This facility is used to fund, and is secured by, mortgages that were originated by RMC and are pending sale. Under the terms of this facility, RMC is required to maintain various financial and other covenants and to satisfy certain requirements relating to the mortgages securing the facility. At March 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with these covenants. The Company had outstanding borrowings against this credit facility that totaled $59.1 million and $73.1 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The weighted-average effective interest rate on the outstanding borrowings against this facility was 3.4 percent at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
To provide letters of credit required in the ordinary course of its business, the Company has various secured letter of credit agreements requiring it to maintain restricted cash deposits for outstanding letters of credit. Outstanding letters of credit totaled $88.6 million and $93.6 million under these agreements at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
To finance its land purchases, the Company may also use seller-financed nonrecourse secured notes payable. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, outstanding seller-financed nonrecourse secured notes payable totaled $767,000 and $689,000, respectively.
The financial services segment uses existing equity, cash generated internally and funds made available under its repurchase credit facilities to finance its operations.
During 2012, the Company filed a shelf registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The registration statement provides that securities may be offered, from time to time, in one or more series and in the form of senior, subordinated or convertible debt; preferred stock; preferred stock represented by depository shares; common stock; stock purchase contracts; stock purchase units; and warrants to purchase both debt and equity securities. The Company filed this registration statement to replace the prior registration statement that expired February 6, 2012. In the future, the Company intends to continue to maintain effective shelf registration statements that will facilitate access to the capital markets. The timing and amount of future offerings, if any, will depend on market and general business conditions.
The Company did not repurchase any shares of its outstanding common stock during the first quarter of 2014. The Company had existing authorization of $142.3 million from its Board of Directors to purchase 3.6 million additional shares, based on the Company’s stock price at March 31, 2014. Outstanding shares of common stock at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, totaled 46,866,216 and 46,234,809, respectively.
The Company is focused on managing overhead expense, land acquisition, development and homebuilding construction activity in conjunction with opportunistic debt offerings in order to maintain cash and appropriate debt levels commensurate with its existing business and growth expectations. The Company believes that it will be able to fund its homebuilding and financial services operations through its existing cash resources and issuances of replacement and new debt.
Off—Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into land and lot option purchase contracts in order to procure land or lots for the construction of homes. Land and lot option purchase contracts enable the Company to
43
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of |
| Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
control significant lot positions with a minimal capital investment, thereby reducing the risks associated with land ownership and development. At March 31, 2014, the Company had $72.7 million in cash deposits and letters of credit outstanding pertaining to land and lot option purchase contracts with an aggregate purchase price of $877.4 million, of which option contracts totaling $2.4 million contained specific performance provisions. At December 31, 2013, the Company had $73.0 million in cash deposits and letters of credit outstanding pertaining to land and lot option purchase contracts with an aggregate purchase price of $869.1 million, of which option contracts totaling $2.5 million contained specific performance provisions. Additionally, the Company’s liability is generally limited to forfeiture of nonrefundable deposits, letters of credit and other nonrefundable amounts incurred.
Pursuant to ASC 810, the Company consolidated $34.5 million and $33.2 million of inventory not owned related to land and lot option purchase contracts at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. (See Note 11, “Variable Interest Entities (‘VIE’).”)
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding letters of credit under secured letter of credit agreements that totaled $88.6 million and $93.6 million, respectively. Additionally, at March 31, 2014, it had performance bonds that totaled $150.8 million, issued by third parties, to secure performance under various contracts and obligations related to land or municipal improvements, compared to $138.9 million at December 31, 2013. The Company expects that the obligations secured by these letters of credit and performance bonds will generally be satisfied in the ordinary course of business and in accordance with applicable contractual terms. To the extent that the obligations are fulfilled, the related letters of credit and performance bonds will be released, and the Company will not have any continuing obligations.
The Company has no material third-party guarantees other than those associated with its senior notes. (See Note 20, “Supplemental Guarantor Information.”)
Critical Accounting Policies
Preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires the use of judgment in the application of accounting policies and estimates of inherently uncertain matters. There were no significant changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies during the three-month period ended March 31, 2014, compared to those policies disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Outlook
Sales volume continued to rise in the first quarter of 2014, despite severe weather conditions in many markets. Although rates of improvement in the Company’s housing markets can vary, it believes that the housing market as a whole may continue to progress due to general improvements in overall economic and employment levels; slow relaxation of an extremely restrictive mortgage underwriting environment; and an expected rise in the number of household formations. The Company believes that if mortgage interest rates increase, they will likely be accompanied by improvements in economic conditions, which should mitigate the impact on demand. Absent unexpected changes in economic conditions and other unforeseen circumstances, these developments, combined with additional leverage of overhead expenditures from higher volumes, should allow the Company to improve its performance. The Company anticipates steady growth in its community count during the remainder of 2014. At March 31, 2014, the Company’s backlog of orders for new homes totaled 3,342 units, with a projected dollar value of $1.1 billion, reflecting a 29.1 percent increase in projected dollar value from $854.8 million at December 31, 2013. The pace at which the Company acquires new land and opens additional communities will depend on market and economic conditions, as well as future sales rates. Although the Company’s outlook remains cautious, the strength of its balance sheet, additional liquidity and improved operating leverage have positioned it to successfully take advantage of any continued improvements in economic trends and in the demand for homes.
44
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in the Company’s market risk since December 31, 2013. For information regarding the Company’s market risk, refer to “Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company has procedures in place for accumulating and evaluating information that enable it to prepare and file reports with the SEC. At the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was performed by the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2014.
The Company has a committee consisting of key officers, including the chief accounting officer and general counsel, to ensure that its disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed such that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC, as well as accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The Company’s management summarized its assessment process and documented its conclusions in the Report of Management, which appears in the Company’s 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm summarized its review of management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting in an attestation report, which also appears within the Company’s 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
At December 31, 2013, the Company completed a detailed evaluation of its internal control over financial reporting, including the assessment, documentation and testing of its controls, as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. No material weaknesses were identified. The Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, has evaluated any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014, and has concluded that there was no change during this period that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
45
PART II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Contingent liabilities may arise from obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business or from the usual obligations of on-site housing producers for the completion of contracts.
On December 23, 2011, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. filed a lawsuit against RMC in California, which was subsequently amended, alleging breach of contract related to repurchase obligations arising out of the sale of mortgage loans associated with a loan purchase agreement between Countrywide and RMC and breach of contract related to indemnity obligations. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against the asserted allegations and causes of actions contained within this lawsuit. (See Note 18, “Commitments and Contingencies.”)
The Company is party to various other legal proceedings generally incidental to its businesses. Based on evaluation of these matters and discussions with counsel, management believes that it is not probable that liabilities arising from these matters will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There were no material changes to the risk factors during the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to the risk factors set forth in the Company’s 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On December 6, 2006, the Company announced that it had received authorization from its Board of Directors to purchase shares totaling $175.0 million. During 2007, 747,000 shares had been repurchased in accordance with this authorization. At March 31, 2014, there was $142.3 million, or 3.6 million additional shares, available for purchase in accordance with this authorization, based on the Company’s stock price on that date. This authorization does not have an expiration date. The Company did not purchase any of its own equity securities during the three months ended March 31, 2014.
46
Item 6. Exhibits |
|
10.1 | 2014 Executive Officer Long-Term Incentive Plan |
| (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K, filed February 28, 2014) |
| |
10.2 | Amendment No. 2 to 2012 Stock Unit Agreement |
| (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K, filed March 5, 2014) |
| |
10.3 | Amendment No. 2 to 2013 Stock Unit Agreement |
| (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K, filed March 5, 2014) |
| |
10.4 | 2014 Stock Unit Agreement |
| (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K, filed March 5, 2014) |
| |
12.1 | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
| (Filed herewith) |
| |
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| (Filed herewith) |
| |
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| (Filed herewith) |
| |
32.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| (Furnished herewith) |
| |
32.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| (Furnished herewith) |
| |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
| (Furnished herewith) |
| |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| (Furnished herewith) |
| |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document |
| (Furnished herewith) |
| |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document |
| (Furnished herewith) |
| |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document |
| (Furnished herewith) |
| |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document |
| (Furnished herewith) |
47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| THE RYLAND GROUP, INC. |
| Registrant |
| |
| |
| |
May 6, 2014 | By: /s/ Gordon A. Milne |
Date | Gordon A. Milne |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| (Principal Financial Officer) |
| |
| |
| |
May 6, 2014 | By: /s/ David L. Fristoe |
Date | David L. Fristoe |
| Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
10.1 | 2014 Executive Officer Long-Term Incentive Plan |
| (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K, filed February 28, 2014) |
| |
10.2 | Amendment No. 2 to 2012 Stock Unit Agreement |
| (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K, filed March 5, 2014) |
| |
10.3 | Amendment No. 2 to 2013 Stock Unit Agreement |
| (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K, filed March 5, 2014) |
| |
10.4 | 2014 Stock Unit Agreement |
| (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K, filed March 5, 2014) |
| |
12.1 | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
| (Filed herewith) |
| |
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| (Filed herewith) |
| |
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| (Filed herewith) |
| |
32.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| (Furnished herewith) |
| |
32.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| (Furnished herewith) |
| |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
| (Furnished herewith) |
| |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| (Furnished herewith) |
| |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document |
| (Furnished herewith) |
| |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document |
| (Furnished herewith) |
| |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document |
| (Furnished herewith) |
| |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document |
| (Furnished herewith) |