UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 000-51072
CASCADE MICROTECH, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Oregon | | 93-0856709 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
9100 S.W. Gemini Drive Beaverton, Oregon | | 97008 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (503) 601-1000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | ¨ | | Accelerated filer | | x |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer | | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell comp any (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of April 29, 2016 was 15,911,672.
CASCADE MICROTECH, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
1
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Cascade Microtech, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited, In thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Current Assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 34,905 | | | $ | 32,107 | |
Short-term marketable securities | | | 3,560 | | | | 3,658 | |
Restricted cash | | | 11 | | | | 10 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $253 and $279 | | | 25,392 | | | | 27,716 | |
Inventories | | | 25,402 | | | | 23,229 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 5,846 | | | | 6,597 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Current Assets | | | 95,116 | | | | 93,317 | |
| | |
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $29,182 and $28,442 | | | 13,326 | | | | 12,256 | |
Goodwill | | | 12,069 | | | | 11,592 | |
Purchased intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $8,149 and $7,403 | | | 8,920 | | | | 9,143 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 5,345 | | | | 5,326 | |
Other assets | | | 697 | | | | 677 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 135,473 | | | $ | 132,311 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | |
Current Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 7,480 | | | $ | 8,834 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 2,757 | | | | 1,617 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 8,418 | | | | 8,488 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Current Liabilities | | | 18,655 | | | | 18,939 | |
| | |
Deferred revenue | | | 519 | | | | 555 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 1,920 | | | | 1,840 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 1,455 | | | | 1,581 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | | | 22,549 | | | | 22,915 | |
| | |
Shareholders’ Equity: | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 100,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 15,912 and 15,871 | | | 159 | | | | 159 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 103,616 | | | | 103,195 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (4,136 | ) | | | (5,251 | ) |
Retained earnings | | | 13,285 | | | | 11,293 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Shareholders’ Equity | | | 112,924 | | | | 109,396 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | | $ | 135,473 | | | $ | 132,311 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Cascade Microtech, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited, In thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Revenue | | $ | 34,803 | | | $ | 31,742 | |
Cost of sales | | | 14,122 | | | | 14,720 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 20,681 | | | | 17,022 | |
| | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Research and development | | | 5,144 | | | | 3,676 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 12,660 | | | | 10,547 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 17,804 | | | | 14,223 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | | 2,877 | | | | 2,799 | |
| | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | |
Interest income (expense), net | | | 11 | | | | (14 | ) |
Other, net | | | (87 | ) | | | 231 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total other income (expense), net | | | (76 | ) | | | 217 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 2,801 | | | | 3,016 | |
Income tax expense | | | 809 | | | | 843 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 1,992 | | | $ | 2,173 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic net income per share | | $ | 0.13 | | | $ | 0.13 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diluted net income per share | | $ | 0.12 | | | $ | 0.13 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Shares used in per share calculations: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 15,893 | | | | 16,523 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | | 16,516 | | | | 17,037 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Cascade Microtech, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Unaudited, In thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Net income | | $ | 1,992 | | | $ | 2,173 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized holding gains | | | 4 | | | | 2 | |
Change in cumulative translation adjustment | | | 1,111 | | | | (2,363 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,115 | | | | (2,361 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | $ | 3,107 | | | $ | (188 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Cascade Microtech, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited, In thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 1,992 | | | $ | 2,173 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 912 | | | | 750 | |
Amortization | | | 550 | | | | 647 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | 760 | | | | 587 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | (1 | ) | | | 39 | |
(Increase) decrease in: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 2,403 | | | | (653 | ) |
Inventories | | | (2,275 | ) | | | 498 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 837 | | | | (160 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | | (1,470 | ) | | | 619 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 1,104 | | | | (353 | ) |
Accrued and other long-term liabilities | | | (343 | ) | | | (1,636 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 4,469 | | | | 2,511 | |
| | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of marketable securities | | | (2,535 | ) | | | (5,829 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities | | | 2,637 | | | | 603 | |
Purchase of fixed assets | | | (1,922 | ) | | | (543 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (1,820 | ) | | | (5,769 | ) |
| | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Witholding taxes paid on net settlement of vested restricted stock units | | | (372 | ) | | | (217 | ) |
Proceeds from issuances of common stock | | | 171 | | | | 277 | |
Cash paid for repurchase of common stock | | | (138 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | (339 | ) | | | 60 | |
| | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | 488 | | | | (830 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 2,798 | | | | (4,028 | ) |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents: | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | 32,107 | | | | 38,107 | |
| | | | | | | | |
End of period | | $ | 34,905 | | | $ | 34,079 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid for income taxes, net | | $ | 1,054 | | | $ | 1,744 | |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash information: | | | | | | | | |
Fixed asset purchases included in accounts payable | | $ | 1,010 | | | $ | 1,442 | |
Transfer from inventory to fixed assets | | | 15 | | | | — | |
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
CASCADE MICROTECH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial information included herein has been prepared by Cascade Microtech, Inc. without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). However, such information reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The financial information as of December 31, 2015 is derived from our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
Note 2. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, and include materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. Demonstration goods, which are included as a component of finished goods, represent inventory that is used for customer demonstration purposes. This inventory is typically sold after 12 to 18 months. We analyze the carrying value of our inventory quarterly, considering a combination of factors including, but not limited to, the following: forecasted sales or usage, historical usage rates, estimated service period, product end-of-life dates, estimated current and future market values, service inventory requirements and new product introductions. We estimate market value based on factors including, but not limited to, replacement cost and estimated resale value with declines in value below cost being recorded quarterly as a component of cost of sales, therefore establishing a new cost basis for the inventory.
Inventory charges were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Inventory charges | | $ | 21 | | | $ | 100 | |
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | | December 31 | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Raw materials | | $ | 14,732 | | | $ | 14,767 | |
Work-in-process | | | 3,855 | | | | 2,793 | |
Finished goods | | | 6,815 | | | | 5,669 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 25,402 | | | $ | 23,229 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Note 3. Net Income Per Share
The following table reconciles the shares used in calculating basic net income per share and diluted net income per share (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Shares used to calculate basic net income per share | | | 15,893 | | | | 16,523 | |
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) | | | 623 | | | | 514 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Shares used to calculate diluted net income per share | | | 16,516 | | | | 17,037 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Securities not included as they would have been antidilutive | | | 751 | | | | 886 | |
| | | | | | | | |
6
Note 4. Product Warranty
We estimate a liability for costs to repair or replace products under warranty for periods ranging from 90 days to one year when the related product revenue is recognized. The liability for product warranties is calculated as a percentage of sales. The percentage is based on historical product repair costs. The liability for product warranties is included in Accrued liabilities in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Product warranty activity was as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Warranty accrual, beginning of period | | $ | 816 | | | $ | 797 | |
Reductions for warranty charges | | | (252 | ) | | | (355 | ) |
Additions to warranty reserve | | | 218 | | | | 379 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Warranty accrual, end of period | | $ | 782 | | | $ | 821 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Note 5. Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The change in goodwill was as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended December 31, 2015 | |
Balance, beginning of period | | $ | 11,592 | | | $ | 12,823 | |
Effect of exchange rate changes | | | 477 | | | | (1,231 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance, end of period | | $ | 12,069 | | | $ | 11,592 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Purchased Intangible Assets
Purchased intangible assets, net included the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Customer relationships | | $ | 4,135 | | | $ | 4,016 | |
Core technology | | | 11,910 | | | | 11,549 | |
Trademarks and tradenames | | | 1,024 | | | | 981 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 17,069 | | | | 16,546 | |
Less accumulated amortization | | | (8,149 | ) | | | (7,403 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 8,920 | | | $ | 9,143 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Intangible asset amortization is a component of Selling, general and administrative expense and was as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Intangible amortization | | $ | 550 | | | $ | 647 | |
7
The estimated amortization of intangible assets is as follows over the next five years and thereafter (in thousands):
| | | | |
Remainder of 2016 | | $ | 1,647 | |
2017 | | | 2,196 | |
2018 | | | 2,118 | |
2019 | | | 1,649 | |
2020 | | | 568 | |
Thereafter | | | 742 | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 8,920 | |
| | | | |
Note 6. Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Accrued compensation and benefits | | $ | 3,925 | | | $ | 4,254 | |
Accrued sales taxes | | | 835 | | | | 1,300 | |
Unrealized losses on foreign currency forward contracts | | | 1,006 | | | | — | |
Accrued income taxes | | | 1,015 | | | | 1,211 | |
Accrued warranty | | | 782 | | | | 816 | |
Other | | | 855 | | | | 907 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 8,418 | | | $ | 8,488 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Note 7. Stock-Based Compensation and Stock-Based Plans
Stock-based compensation was included in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Cost of sales | | $ | 49 | | | $ | 27 | |
Research and development | | | 109 | | | | 64 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 602 | | | | 496 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 760 | | | $ | 587 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stock Incentive Plans
Stock option activity for the first three months of 2016 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Options Outstanding | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 | | | 918,798 | | | $ | 6.65 | |
Granted | | | — | | | | — | |
Exercised | | | (10,982 | ) | | | 13.53 | |
Forfeited | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2016 | | | 907,816 | | | | 6.56 | |
| | | | | | | | |
8
RSU activity for the first three months of 2016 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | RSUs | | | Weighted Average Grant Date Per Share Fair Value | |
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 | | | 489,108 | | | $ | 12.04 | |
Granted | | | 37,200 | | | | 19.49 | |
Vested | | | (57,738 | ) | | | 10.25 | |
Forfeited | | | (1,712 | ) | | | 12.17 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2016 | | | 466,858 | | | | 12.85 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As of March 31, 2016, total unrecognized stock-based compensation related to outstanding, but unvested, stock options and RSUs was $5.3 million, which will be recognized over the weighted average remaining vesting period of 2.2 years.
Note 8. Segment Reporting
The segment data below is presented in the same manner that management currently organizes the segments for assessing certain performance trends. Our Chief Operating Decision Maker monitors the revenue streams and the operating income of our Systems segment and our Probes segment. We do not track our assets on a segment level, and, accordingly, that information is not provided.
Revenue and operating income information by segment was as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Systems | | | Probes | | | Corporate Unallocated | | | Total | |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 17,554 | | | $ | 17,249 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 34,803 | |
Gross profit | | $ | 9,285 | | | $ | 11,396 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 20,681 | |
Gross margin | | | 52.9 | % | | | 66.1 | % | | | — | | | | 59.4 | % |
Income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1,266 | | | $ | 6,690 | | | $ | (5,079 | ) | | $ | 2,877 | |
| | | | |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 17,470 | | | $ | 14,272 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 31,742 | |
Gross profit | | $ | 8,494 | | | $ | 8,528 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 17,022 | |
Gross margin | | | 48.6 | % | | | 59.8 | % | | | — | | | | 53.6 | % |
Income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1,496 | | | $ | 5,087 | | | $ | (3,784 | ) | | $ | 2,799 | |
We had one customer which represented approximately 17% of our revenue for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016. However, no customer accounted for 10% or greater of our total revenue in the three-month period ended March 31, 2015.
Note 9. Fair Value Measurements
Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities and are summarized into three broad categories:
| • | | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities; |
| • | | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, credit risk, etc.; and |
| • | | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs, including our own assumptions in determining fair value. |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
9
The disclosures related to our financial assets and (liabilities) that are reported at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2016 | | | December 31, 2015 | |
| | Fair Value | | | Input Level | | | Fair Value | | | Input Level | |
Marketable securities – corporate equities | | $ | 4 | | | | Level 1 | | | $ | 5 | | | | Level 1 | |
Marketable securities – corporate obligations | | $ | 498 | | | | Level 2 | | | $ | 1,871 | | | | Level 2 | |
Marketable securities – U.S. treasury securities | | $ | 2,036 | | | | Level 2 | | | $ | — | | | | Level 2 | |
Marketable securities – U.S. agency securities | | $ | 1,022 | | | | Level 2 | | | $ | 1,782 | | | | Level 2 | |
Forward sale contracts for Japanese yen | | $ | (109 | ) | | | Level 2 | | | $ | (52 | ) | | | Level 2 | |
Forward purchase contract for euro | | $ | 53 | | | | Level 2 | | | $ | (66 | ) | | | Level 2 | |
Forward sale contract for euro | | $ | (950 | ) | | | Level 2 | | | $ | 896 | | | | Level 2 | |
The fair value of our marketable securities is determined based on quoted market prices for similar or identical securities. Any unrealized gain or loss is recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The fair value of our forward contracts is based on quoted market prices for similar securities and is used for the purpose of determining any gain or loss on our foreign currency positions. We do not record the full value of the forward contracts on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We record the net unrealized gain or loss in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of Other income (expense).
The carrying values of Cash and cash equivalents, Restricted cash, Accounts receivable, Prepaid expenses and other, Accounts payable and Accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities.
No changes were made to our valuation techniques during the first quarter of 2016.
Note 10. Stock Repurchase Program
In August 2015, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which we could repurchase up to $15.0 million of our common stock. During January 2016, we (a) repurchased 8,736 shares at a weighted average price of $15.82 per share for a total of $0.1 million under a Rule 10b5-1 plan; and (b) terminated the Rule 10b5-1 plan. As of March 31, 2016, $2.7 million remained available for stock repurchases under the program. However, pursuant to the terms of the merger described in Note 11, we have suspended the stock repurchasing program. This program does not have an expiration date.
Note 11. Merger Agreement
On February 3, 2016, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with FormFactor, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“FormFactor”), and Cardinal Merger Subsidiary, Inc., an Oregon corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of FormFactor (“Merger Sub”). The Merger Agreement provides for, among other things, the merger of Merger Sub with and into Cascade Microtech, Inc., with Cascade Microtech, Inc. continuing as the surviving corporation (the “Merger”). Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of our common stock will be converted into the right to receive (a) $16.00 in cash, without interest, and (b) 0.6534 shares of FormFactor common stock, subject to adjustment. Our board of directors, by unanimous vote, approved the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. In addition, the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”) for the Merger Agreement expired on March 21, 2016.
A description of the Merger Agreement is included in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 9, 2016, and a copy of the Merger Agreement is attached as Exhibit 2.1 to that report.
Note 12. Contingencies
Since the public announcement of the proposed Merger between us and FormFactor on February 4, 2016, plaintiffs have filed two putative shareholder class action lawsuits against us, our directors, FormFactor and Merger Sub in connection with our entry into the Merger Agreement with FormFactor. The first lawsuit was filed in Washington County Circuit Court in the State of Oregon on March 8, 2016. The second lawsuit was filed in Multnomah County Circuit Court in the State of Oregon on April 8, 2016.
10
The plaintiffs in both lawsuits allege that the individual members of our board of directors breached their fiduciary duties to our shareholders by approving the proposed Merger for inadequate consideration; approving the Merger to obtain unique benefits not shared equally with our other shareholders; failing to take steps to maximize the value paid to our shareholders; failing to take steps to ensure a fair process leading up to the proposed Merger; and agreeing to preclusive deal protection devices in the Merger Agreement. The lawsuits also allege claims against FormFactor and Merger Sub for aiding and abetting our directors’ alleged breaches of their fiduciary duties. The second lawsuit also includes allegations that our directors breached their fiduciary duties by failing to disclose material information about the Merger in the Form S-4/proxy statement/prospectus filed by FormFactor with the SEC on April 1, 2016. The plaintiffs seek, among other things, injunctive relief prohibiting completion of the Merger, rescission of the Merger if it is completed, and an accounting by defendants, plaintiffs’ attorney’s fees and costs, and other relief.
At the request of the plaintiff in the first lawsuit, the court dismissed the first lawsuit without prejudice on April 22, 2016. The litigation will proceed in Multnomah County Circuit Court with the complaint in the second lawsuit as the operative complaint.
Based on the early stage of the second lawsuit, the amount or range of reasonably possible losses to which we may be exposed cannot be estimated and the ultimate resolution of this matter and the associated financial impact to us, if any, remains uncertain at this time. We maintain a directors and officers insurance policy that provides coverage for claims such as those alleged in the complaint, subject to coverage defenses, policy limits and a deductible. Regardless of the outcome of the claims, the defense of the claims may cause us to incur costs and divert resources and the attention of management from our business.
We intend to vigorously defend against the claims in the litigation.
Note 13. Recent Accounting Guidance
ASU 2016-10
In April 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) - Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing.” ASU 2016-10 clarifies aspects of Topic 606 related to identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related core principles for those areas. The effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2016-10 are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in ASU 2014-09. While we do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-10 to have a material effect on our business, we are still evaluating any potential impact that adoption of ASU 2016-10 may have on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2016-09
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation – Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” ASU 2016-09 simplifies the accounting for several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-09 to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2016-02
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases.” ASU 2016-02 increases transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and requires disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. While we do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-02 to have a material effect on our business, we are still evaluating any potential impact that adoption of ASU 2016-02 may have on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
11
ASU 2016-01
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10).” ASU 2016-01 enhances the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information by addressing certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The amendments simplify certain requirements and also reduce diversity in current practice for other requirements. ASU 2016-01 is effective for public companies’ fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Except for the early application guidance specifically allowed in ASU 2016-01, early adoption is not permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-01 to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2015-11
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11 “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330).” ASU 2015-11 simplifies the accounting for the valuation of all inventory not accounted for using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method by prescribing that inventory be valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. ASU 2015-11 is effective for public companies’ annual periods, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016 on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-11 to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2015-05
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-05, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40).” ASU 2015-05 provides guidance regarding the accounting for a customer’s fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement; specifically about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, and if so, how to account for the software license. ASU 2015-05 is effective for public companies’ annual periods, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 on either a prospective or retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2015-05 did not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2015-02
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810).” ASU 2015-02 amends guidance regarding the consolidation of certain legal entities. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of ASU 2015-02 did not have any effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2014-16
In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-16, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815).” ASU 2014-16 addresses whether the host contract in a hybrid financial instrument issued in the form of a share should be accounted for as debt or equity. ASU 2014-16 is effective for annual periods and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. We do not currently have issued, nor are we investors in, hybrid financial instruments. Accordingly, the adoption of ASU 2014-16 did not have any effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2014-12
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718).” ASU 2014-12 addresses accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. ASU 2014-12 indicates that, in such situations, the performance target should be treated as a performance condition and, accordingly, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Instead, compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved. ASU 2014-12 is effective for annual periods and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 did not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
12
ASU 2014-09
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” ASU 2014-09 clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue and develops a common revenue standard for GAAP and the International Accounting Standards Board. ASU 2014-09, as amended, is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We have not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting.
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact made in this Quarterly Report on Form10-Q are forward-looking including, among others, statements regarding: our future financial position and results of operations, including the estimated revenue for the second quarter of 2016; our proposed Merger with FormFactor; litigation relating to the proposed Merger; the future impact of any off-balance sheet arrangements; our estimated costs to repair or replace products under warranty; our strategies and intentions and potential sources of funds regarding any acquisitions; our accounting and tax policies and the impact of adopting accounting guidance on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows; seasonality of our revenues and expected increases in revenue in the last month of each quarter; our ability to meet our cash requirements for the next 12 months and for the foreseeable future and the sources we anticipate using to meet these cash requirements. These statements relate to future events of our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology, including “intend,” “could,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “future,” or “continue,” the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially from those expressed or implied such forward-looking statements. In evaluating these statements, you should specifically consider various factors, including: changes in demand for our products; changes in product mix; the timing of shipments, customer orders and capital expenditures; constraints on availability of components; excess or shortage of production capacity; potential failure of expected market opportunities to materialize; changes in foreign exchange rates; conditions to closing in the Merger Agreement; the inherent uncertainties of litigation; and other risks included in Item 1A to our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2016.
General
We design, develop, manufacture and market advanced wafer probing, thermal and reliability solutions for the electrical measurement and testing of high performance semiconductor devices. Our products enable precision on-wafer measurement of integrated circuits and are often used in the early phases of the development of semiconductor processes where the accuracy and repeatability of measurements is critical to achieving yield from advanced process nodes. Many of our products are also used in production applications to test semiconductor devices prior to completion of the manufacturing process. We design, manufacture and assemble most of our products in Beaverton, Oregon, Munich, Germany, and Dresden, Germany and maintain global sales, service and support centers in North America, Germany, Japan, Taiwan, China and Singapore.
We operate in two business segments: Systems and Probes. Sales of our probe stations, thermal sub-systems and reliability test systems are included in the Systems segment and sales of our analytical probes and production probe cards are included in the Probes segment.
Our probe stations provide precise and accurate measurement of semiconductor electrical characteristics during device design or when optimizing the chip fabrication process. Our probe stations are highly configurable and are typically sold with various accessories, including our analytical probes, as well as accessories from third parties. In addition, we design and build custom probe stations to address the specific requirements of our customers. We also generate revenue through the sales of service contracts for our stations.
13
Our thermal sub-systems are designed and produced by ATT Systems, a wholly-owned subsidiary based in Munich, Germany, which we acquired in October 2013. ATT Systems produces thermal chuck systems used in probe stations, as well as specific systems for testing electronic components, hybrids, PCBs or other assemblies at the test site. Designed for thermal and mechanical stability and precision, our thermal sub-systems offer a broad range of modular solutions that can be used in new installations, as well as upgrades to existing equipment.
We acquired our reliability test products in July 2013 from Aetrium Incorporated. The 1164 Reliability Test System is a modular and scalable test platform that can be used in a wide range of reliability test applications, including Electro Migration (“EM”), Stress Migration (“SM”), Time Dependent Dielectric Breakdown (“TDDB”), Stress Induced Leakage Current (“SILC”) and Bias Temperature Instability (“BTI”). In addition to the 1164 Reliability Test System, we also offer the Symphony Wafer Level Reliability (“WLR”) Test System which, when combined with either an automated or semi-automated probe station, and our Conductor software, provides users with the necessary tools for automated and unattended WRL testing to shorten product development cycles and enhance product quality.
Our analytical probes are sold to serve as components of our probe stations, or, less often, to serve as components of test equipment manufactured by third parties. Our production probe cards are designed and sold for high-volume production test applications, ranging from very low current parametric testing to sophisticated, high-speed radio frequency integrated circuit (“RFIC”) testing. These probe cards are used in conjunction with third party equipment from manufacturers such as Advantest, Agilent and Teradyne.
Merger Agreement with FormFactor, Inc.
On February 3, 2016, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with FormFactor, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“FormFactor”), and Cardinal Merger Subsidiary, Inc., an Oregon corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of FormFactor. The Merger Agreement provides for, among other things, the acquisition by FormFactor of our company. See Notes 11 and 12 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Overview
Revenue increased $3.1 million to $34.8 million in the first quarter of 2016 compared to $31.7 million in the first quarter of 2015, primarily due to increased unit sales in our Probes segment. Gross profit increased $3.7 million to $20.7 million in the first quarter of 2016 compared to $17.0 million in the first quarter of 2015, primarily due to an increase in overall revenue, increases in gross margin and changes in product sales mix.
Outlook
Based on our current backlog, projected bookings and scheduled shipments, we anticipate revenues will be in the range of $38 million to $42 million for the second quarter of 2016.
Critical Accounting Policies and the Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that have become increasingly difficult to make in the current economic environment. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The estimates we make may change in the future.
We reaffirm the critical accounting policies and estimates as reported in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2016.
14
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our consolidated statement of operations data for the periods indicated as a percentage of revenue.(1)
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Revenue | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Cost of sales | | | 40.6 | | | | 46.4 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 59.4 | | | | 53.6 | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Research and development | | | 14.8 | | | | 11.6 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 36.4 | | | | 33.2 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 51.2 | | | | 44.8 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | | 8.3 | | | | 8.8 | |
Other income (expense), net | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 0.7 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 8.0 | | | | 9.5 | |
Income tax expense | | | 2.3 | | | | 2.7 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 5.7 | % | | | 6.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) | Percentages may not add due to rounding. |
Revenue and operating income information by segment was as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Systems | | | Probes | | | Corporate Unallocated | | | Total | |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 17,554 | | | $ | 17,249 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 34,803 | |
Gross profit | | $ | 9,285 | | | $ | 11,396 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 20,681 | |
Gross margin | | | 52.9 | % | | | 66.1 | % | | | — | | | | 59.4 | % |
Income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1,266 | | | $ | 6,690 | | | $ | (5,079 | ) | | $ | 2,877 | |
| | | | |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 17,470 | | | $ | 14,272 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 31,742 | |
Gross profit | | $ | 8,494 | | | $ | 8,528 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 17,022 | |
Gross margin | | | 48.6 | % | | | 59.8 | % | | | — | | | | 53.6 | % |
Income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1,496 | | | $ | 5,087 | | | $ | (3,784 | ) | | $ | 2,799 | |
Revenue
Revenue information was as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | | | Dollar | | | | |
Revenue | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | Change | | | % Change | |
Systems | | $ | 17,554 | | | $ | 17,470 | | | $ | 84 | | | | 0.5 | % |
Probes | | | 17,249 | | | | 14,272 | | | | 2,977 | | | | 20.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 34,803 | | | $ | 31,742 | | | $ | 3,061 | | | | 9.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Systems
The increase in Systems revenue in the first quarter of 2016, compared to the first quarter of 2015, was primarily attributable to increased sales of service and thermal sub-systems, partially offset by decreased sales of probe stations.
Probes
The increase in Probes revenue in the first quarter of 2016, compared to the first quarter of 2015, was primarily the result of increased unit sales of both analytical probes and production probe cards.
Cost of Sales and Gross Margin
Cost of sales includes purchased materials, fabrication, assembly, test, installation labor, overhead, customer-specific engineering costs, warranty costs, royalties and provision for inventory valuation reserves.
15
Cost of sales information was as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | | | Dollar | | | | |
Cost of Sales | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | Change | | | % Change | |
Systems | | $ | 8,269 | | | $ | 8,976 | | | $ | (707 | ) | | | (7.9 | )% |
Probes | | | 5,853 | | | | 5,744 | | | | 109 | | | | 1.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 14,122 | | | $ | 14,720 | | | $ | (598 | ) | | | (4.1 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales was affected by changes in revenue as discussed above combined with the factors that caused fluctuations in our gross margin (gross profit as a percentage of revenue), as discussed below.
Gross margins were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
Gross Margins | | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Systems | | | 52.9 | % | | | 48.6 | % |
Probes | | | 66.1 | % | | | 59.8 | % |
Overall | | | 59.4 | % | | | 53.6 | % |
Systems
The increase in Systems gross margins in the first quarter of 2016, compared to the first quarter of 2015, was primarily attributable to a change in sales mix as discussed above, integration of ATT thermal subsystems into our probe stations, improved factory utilization due to factory integration, and changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Probes
The increase in Probes gross margins in the first quarter of 2016, compared to the first quarter of 2015, was primarily due to increased unit sales, which increased factory utilization and decreased unabsorbed period expenses, changes in sales mix, and changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Overall
The overall increase in gross margins in the first quarter of 2016, compared to the first quarter of 2015, was primarily attributable to a shift in mix to a greater percentage of our revenue being derived from our Probes segment, as well as to the individual segment items discussed above.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and include compensation and related expenses for personnel, materials, consultants and overhead.
Information regarding our research and development expense was as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | | | Dollar | | | | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | Change | | | % Change | |
Research and development | | $ | 5,144 | | | $ | 3,676 | | | $ | 1,468 | | | | 39.9 | % |
The increase in research and development in the first quarter of 2016, compared to the first quarter of 2015, was primarily due to:
| • | | a $0.6 million increase in salaries and benefits; |
| • | | a $0.5 million increase in project-related expenses; and |
| • | | a $0.2 million increase in depreciation expense. |
These increases were driven by new product development for our Probes segment.
16
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense includes compensation and related expenses for personnel, travel, outside services, manufacturers’ representative commissions, intangible asset amortization and overhead incurred in our sales, marketing, customer support, management, legal and other professional and administrative support functions, as well as costs to operate as a public company.
Information regarding our SG&A expense was as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | | | Dollar | | | | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | Change | | | % Change | |
Selling, general and administrative | | $ | 12,660 | | | $ | 10,547 | | | $ | 2,113 | | | | 20.0 | % |
The increase in SG&A in the first quarter of 2016, compared to the first quarter of 2015, was primarily due to:
| • | | a $1.5 million increase in acquisition costs related to the Merger Agreement with FormFactor; |
| • | | a $0.8 million increase in salaries and benefits; |
| • | | a $0.1 million increase in stock-based compensation; partially offset by |
| • | | a $0.2 million decrease in selling expenses; and |
| • | | a $0.1 million decrease in amortization expense. |
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense) typically includes interest income, interest expense, gains and losses on foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency gains and losses. Other income (expense) may also include other miscellaneous non-operating gains and losses.
Other income (expense), net was comprised of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Interest income (expense), net | | $ | 11 | | | $ | (14 | ) |
Foreign currency gains (losses) | | | 1,028 | | | | (2,178 | ) |
Gains (losses) on foreign currency forward contracts | | | (1,124 | ) | | | 2,411 | |
Other | | | 9 | | | | (2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | (76 | ) | | $ | 217 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Interest income represents interest earned on cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities. Interest expense in the first quarter of 2015 represents interest paid related to a tax audit in Germany.
Foreign currency gains and losses primarily result from a combination of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and the net value of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in yen, euro and other foreign currencies.
Income Taxes
Information regarding our income tax expense was as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Income tax provision | | $ | 809 | | | $ | 843 | |
Income tax provision as a percentage of income before income taxes | | | 28.9 | % | | | 28.0 | % |
Generally, the provision for income taxes is the result of the mix of profits and losses earned by us and our subsidiaries in tax jurisdictions with a broad range of income tax rates and changes in tax reserves.
Our effective tax rate is lower than the US Federal statutory tax rate of 35 percent primarily due to lower tax rates in foreign jurisdictions, the effect of federal and state tax credits and discrete items that may occur in any given year. As of March 31, 2016, we had $1.5 million of capitalized acquisition related transaction costs for tax purposes.
17
The first quarter of 2016 includes a $0.1 million discrete tax benefit from a change in estimated research and development tax credits for 2015. The first quarter of 2015 includes a $0.2 million discrete tax benefit resulting from the favorable resolution of a tax audit in Germany. The tax benefits in the first quarters of 2016 and 2015 represent approximately 4.7% and 5.1%, respectively, of income before income taxes
Deferred tax assets arise from the tax benefit of amounts expensed for financial reporting purposes but not yet realized for tax purposes and from unutilized tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards. We evaluate our deferred tax assets on a regular basis to determine if a valuation allowance is required. To the extent it is determined that it is more likely than not that we will not realize the benefit of our deferred tax assets, we record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets.
As of March 31, 2016, the net deferred tax assets on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets totaled $3.4 million, and related primarily to acquisition intangibles, forward contracts and other temporary differences.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Changes in our assets and liabilities as presented in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows do not equal the changes in such assets and liabilities as calculated from our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets due to the effects of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates.
Net cash provided by operating activities in the first quarter of 2016 was $4.5 million and primarily consisted of our net income of $2.0 million and net non-cash charges of $2.2 million, as adjusted for changes in our operating assets and liabilities as described below.
Accounts receivable, net decreased by $2.3 million to $25.4 million at March 31, 2016, compared to $27.7 million at December 31, 2015, primarily due to the overall decrease in revenue in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the fourth quarter of 2015 and the timing of shipments and customer payments.
Inventories increased by $2.2 million to $25.4 million at March 31, 2016, compared to $23.2 million at December 31, 2015. The increase in inventory was primarily related to an increase in work-in-process and finished goods for orders scheduled to ship in the second quarter of 2016, and changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Prepaid expenses and other decreased by $0.8 million to $5.8 million at March 31, 2016, compared to $6.6 million at December 31, 2015, primarily due to a decrease in unrealized gains on foreign currency exchange contracts.
Accounts payable decreased by $1.3 million to $7.5 million at March 31, 2016, compared to $8.8 million at December 31, 2015, primarily due to the timing of payments to vendors, offset partially by an overall increase in inventory purchasing.
Deferred revenue increased by $1.1 million to $3.3 million at March 31, 2016, compared to $2.2 million at December 31, 2015, primarily due to an increase in customer deposits and the timing of customer payments for service contracts.
Cash used for fixed asset purchases of $1.9 million in the first quarter of 2016 was primarily related to production-related equipment, and research and development tools.
In August 2015, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which we could repurchase up to $15.0 million of our common stock. During January 2016, we (a) repurchased a total of 8,736 shares at a weighted-average price of $15.82 per share, for a total purchase price of $0.1 million under a Rule 10b5-1 plan relating to the repurchase program; and (b) terminated the Rule 10b5-1 plan. As of March 31, 2016, $2.7 million remained available for stock repurchases under the program, which does not have an expiration date. However, pursuant to the terms of the merger described in Note 11 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1, we have suspended the stock repurchasing program.
18
We have a line of credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. for a maximum $10.0 million line of credit facility (the “LOC”), which may be limited by a borrowing base. The LOC matures March 5, 2018 and contains a $2.5 million sublimit for letters of credit. Interest is based primarily on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The LOC contains restrictive and financial covenants. On March 31, 2016, no amounts were outstanding under the LOC, no letters of credit were outstanding, $10.0 million was available for borrowing and we were in compliance with all covenants.
We anticipate meeting our cash requirements for the next 12 months and for the foreseeable future from existing Cash and cash equivalents, Short-term marketable securities and Restricted cash, which totaled $38.5 million at March 31, 2016. In addition, we currently have $10.0 million available under the LOC as discussed above.
Contractual Commitments
The following is a summary of our contractual commitments and obligations as of March 31, 2016 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments Due By Period | |
Contractual Obligation | | Total | | | Remainder of 2016 | | | 2017 and 2018 | | | 2019 and 2020 | | | 2021 and beyond | |
Operating leases | | $ | 8,140 | | | $ | 1,825 | | | $ | 4,068 | | | $ | 1,866 | | | $ | 381 | |
Purchase order commitments(1) | | | 11,574 | | | | 10,594 | | | | 980 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 19,714 | | | $ | 12,419 | | | $ | 5,048 | | | $ | 1,866 | | | $ | 381 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Purchase order commitments primarily represent open orders for inventory and capital expenditures. |
Recent Accounting Guidance
See Note 13 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Seasonality
Typically, our first quarter revenues are lower than our revenues from the preceding fourth quarter. In addition, as is typical in our industry, we recognize a large percentage of our quarterly revenue in the last month of the quarter. However, our seasonality can be affected by general economic trends and it should not be expected that historical revenue patterns will continue.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
There have been no material changes in our reported market risks or risk management policies since the filing of our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2016.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
19
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner, and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Limitation on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all occurrences of fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control systems are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of all controls must be considered relative to their costs. Control systems can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. In addition, over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that the control systems will detect all control issues, including instances of fraud, if any.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Since the public announcement of the proposed Merger between us and FormFactor on February 4, 2016, plaintiffs have filed two putative shareholder class action lawsuits against us, our directors, FormFactor and Merger Sub in connection with our entry into the Merger Agreement with FormFactor. The first lawsuit was filed in Washington County Circuit Court in the State of Oregon on March 8, 2016. The second lawsuit was filed in Multnomah County Circuit Court in the State of Oregon on April 8, 2016.
The plaintiffs in both lawsuits allege that the individual members of our board of directors breached their fiduciary duties to our shareholders by approving the proposed Merger for inadequate consideration; approving the Merger to obtain unique benefits not shared equally with our other shareholders; failing to take steps to maximize the value paid to our shareholders; failing to take steps to ensure a fair process leading up to the proposed Merger; and agreeing to preclusive deal protection devices in the Merger Agreement. The lawsuits also allege claims against FormFactor and Merger Sub for aiding and abetting our directors’ alleged breaches of their fiduciary duties. The second lawsuit also includes allegations that our directors breached their fiduciary duties by failing to disclose material information about the Merger in the Form S-4/proxy statement/prospectus filed by FormFactor with the SEC on April 1, 2016. The plaintiffs seek, among other things, injunctive relief prohibiting completion of the Merger, rescission of the Merger if it is completed, and an accounting by defendants, plaintiffs’ attorney’s fees and costs, and other relief.
At the request of the plaintiff in the first lawsuit, the court dismissed the first lawsuit without prejudice on April 22, 2016. The litigation will proceed in Multnomah County Circuit Court with the complaint in the second lawsuit as the operative complaint.
Based on the early stage of the second lawsuit, the amount or range of reasonably possible losses to which we may be exposed cannot be estimated and the ultimate resolution of this matter and the associated financial impact to us, if any, remains uncertain at this time. We maintain a directors and officers insurance policy that provides coverage for claims such as those alleged in the complaint, subject to coverage defenses, policy limits and a deductible. Regardless of the outcome of the claims, the defense of the claims may cause us to incur costs and divert resources and the attention of management from our business.
20
We intend to vigorously defend against the claims in the litigation.
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 includes a detailed discussion of our risk factors. There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, the information in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the risk factors and information disclosed in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2016.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Repurchases of Equity Securities
We made the following repurchases of our common stock during the first quarter of 2016:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total number of shares purchased | | | Average price paid per share | | | Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plan | | | Maximum dollar amount of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan (in thousands) | |
January 1 – January 31 | | | 8,736 | | | $ | 15.82 | | | | 8,736 | | | $ | 2,688 | |
February 1 – February 29 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 2,688 | |
March 1 – March 31 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 2,688 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 8,736 | | | $ | 15.82 | | | | 8,736 | | | $ | 2,688 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
These shares were repurchased under a Rule 10b5-1 plan and our share repurchase program approved by our board of directors in August 2015, which program authorized the repurchase of up to a total of $15.0 million of our common stock from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. We terminated the Rule 10b5-1 plan in January 2016. The August 2015 repurchase program does not have an expiration date. Pursuant to the terms of the merger described in Note 11 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1, we have suspended the stock repurchasing program.
The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference hereto and this list is intended to constitute the exhibit index:
| | |
2.1 | | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated February 3, 2016, by and among Cascade Microtech, Inc., FormFactor, Inc. and Cardinal Merger Subsidiary, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 9, 2016. |
| |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
| |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
| |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
| |
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
| |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document. |
| |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
| |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
| |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
| |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
| |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
21
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | |
Date: May 4, 2016 | | | | | | CASCADE MICROTECH, INC. |
| | | | | | (Registrant) |
| | | |
| | | | By: | | /s/ MICHAEL D. BURGER |
| | | | | | Michael D. Burger |
| | | | | | Director, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | | | | | (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | | |
| | | | By: | | /s/ JEFF KILLIAN |
| | | | | | Jeff Killian |
| | | | | | Chief Financial Officer |
| | | | | | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
22