The National Security Group, Inc.
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of The National Security Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, and condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three-month periods then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the company’s management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of The National Security Group, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 28, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ Barfield, Murphy, Shank, & Smith, P.C.
MANAGEMENTS’ DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion addresses the financial condition of The National Security Group, Inc. (referred to in this document as we, our, us, the Company or NSEC) as of March 31, 2007, compared with December 31, 2006 and its results of operations and cash flows for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, compared with the same period last year. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this report and with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
This discussion will primarily consist of an analysis of the two segments of our operations. The life segment consists of the operations of our life insurance subsidiary, National Security Insurance Company (NSIC). The property and casualty (P&C) segment consists of the operations of our two property and casualty insurance subsidiaries, National Security Fire & Casualty Company (NSFC) and Omega One Insurance Company (Omega).
This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs and expectations. These statements are based upon current plans, estimates and projections. Our actual results may differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. See “Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” contained on Page 3 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The reader is assumed to have access to the Company’s 2006 Annual Report. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Annual Report and with consolidated financial statements on pages 3 through 6 of this form
10-Q.
Information in this discussion is presented in whole dollars rounded to the nearest thousand.
OVERVIEW
The National Security Group operates in the property and casualty and life, accident and supplemental health insurance businesses and markets products primarily through independent agents. The Company operates in eleven states with over 60% of total premium revenue generated in the states of Alabama and Mississippi. Over 70% of total premium revenue is generated from dwelling property (fire and extended coverage), homeowners and mobile homeowners lines of business. Property and casualty insurance is the most significant segment accounting for 88.6% of total insurance premium revenue in the first quarter of 2007.
Our first quarter 2007 results were significantly improved compared to the first quarter of 2006. All of our insurance subsidiaries posted positive contributions to net income for the quarter. Net income increased $1,324,000 over the first quarter of 2006 from a net loss of $(141,000) in 2006 to net income of $1,183,000 for the first quarter of 2007.
Improved operating results in the property and casualty subsidiary was the primary catalyst leading to the improvement in net income. Catastrophe related losses were comparable in both years. In 2006 we incurred over $650,000 in catastrophe related losses primarily associated with hail storms in Georgia. In 2007, we incurred $631,000 in losses primarily associated with a tornado outbreak on March 1 in South Alabama. The improvement in property and casualty results was due to improvement in the loss ratio in several lines of business with the most significant improvement occurring in the homeowners program in Louisiana. The decrease in claims led to a GAAP combined ratio of 92% for the quarter, a significant decline from last year’s first quarter combined ratio of 106%. The improvement in the combined ratio was the primary factor contributing to net income for the quarter of $1,183,000 compared to a net loss of $(141,000) for the same period last year.
Our premium revenue growth has continued on a track of modest growth with an increase of 7% for the first quarter of 2007 compared to the first quarter of 2006. In the first quarter of 2007, premium revenue in the property and casualty segment grew 7.77% compared to the same quarter last year. Premium revenue growth for the year 2007 is expected to remain in the range of 6% to 8% for the year.
15
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Premium revenues:
The primary component of our revenues is insurance premium revenue generated by our life and P&C insurance operations. Life segment revenue consists of life, accident and health insurance policies issued in the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas. P&C segment revenue consists primarily of dwelling fire, homeowners, and private passenger auto insurance but we also offer commercial auto and ocean marine insurance in select markets. The P&C segment operates in the states of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida (ocean marine only), Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas.
The following table sets forth premium revenue by major line of business for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same period last year:
| | Three months ended March 31, | | Percent |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | increase (decrease) |
| | | | | | | |
Life, accident and health operations: | | | | | | | |
Traditional life insurance | $ | 1,390,814 | $ | 1,352,387 | | 2.84 | % |
Accident and health insurance | | 385,704 | | 351,275 | | 9.80 | % |
Other | | - | | - | | - | % |
Total life, accident and health | | 1,776,518 | | 1,703,661 | | 4.28 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Property and Casualty operations: | | | | | | | |
Dwelling fire & extended coverage | | 6,509,672 | | 6,286,631 | | 3.55 | % |
Homeowners (Including mobile homeowners) | 6,736,409 | | 5,468,201 | | 23.19 | % |
Ocean marine | | 450,880 | | 416,063 | | 8.37 | % |
Other liability | | 398,409 | | 373,609 | | 6.64 | % |
Private passenger auto liability | | 477,660 | | 692,982 | | (31.07) | % |
Commercial auto liability | | 190,493 | | 161,229 | | 18.15 | % |
Auto physical damage | | 257,600 | | 539,420 | | (52.24) | % |
Reinsurance premium ceded | | (1,240,952) | | (1,150,993) | | 7.82 | % |
Total property and casualty | | 13,780,171 | | 12,787,141 | | 7.77 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Total earned premium revenue | $ | 15,556,689 | $ | 14,490,803 | | 7.36 | % |
Premium revenue in the life segment accounts for 11.4% of total premium income of the Company. NSIC has two primary methods of distribution of insurance products, employee agents and independent agents. Employee agents primarily consist of home service agents that sell policies and collect premium primarily in the insured’s home. Revenue from business in-force serviced by home service agents accounted for 39% of total NSIC premium revenue in the quarter. This has been the primary method of product distribution for NSIC since it’s founding in 1947. Independent agents now account for over 90% of all new business production in NSIC. Revenue from business in-force serviced by independent agents now accounts for 53% of total NSIC premium revenue. In addition to the two primary methods of product distribution, approximately 8% of premium revenue is generated from the servicing of discontinued books of business and inactive programs. The most significant of these discontinued books of business is a block of policies acquired by NSIC from another carrier in 2000.
Premium revenue in NSIC consists of traditional life insurance products and supplemental accident and health products. As set forth in the preceding table, traditional life insurance premium revenue increased 2.8% in the first three months of 2007 compared to the same period last year. Accident and health insurance premium revenue increased 9.8%. In total NSIC premium revenue is up 4.3% in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the same period last year. A 16.7% increase in premium revenue from the independent agent distribution channel is the primary reason for the increase in first quarter premium revenue in this segment. We will continue to maintain the home service distribution method but it is not expected to generate premium revenue growth.
16
Premium revenue in the P&C segment increased 7.8% in the first three months of 2007 compared to the same period last year. After several years of rapid growth from 2001 through 2004, premium revenue has slowed to a more modest pace. Segment revenue in the dwelling fire program has slowed from last years double digit growth rates to 3.6%. Our homeowners lines of business continued to grow at a double digit pace for the quarter at 23.2% but we expect this rate of growth to moderate later this year as we have implemented some more stringent underwriting guidelines in order to improve profitability. The gains in the dwelling lines of business were partially offset by declines in the automobile liability and physical damage lines of business which declined 31% and 52% respectively. Increased price competition in the auto lines of business has depressed premium revenue but we are expecting to launch a product upgrade in the sec ond half of 2007 that is expected to improve the competitive position of our auto insurance product line. Reinsurance premium ceded increased 7.8% in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the same period last year which also depressed the rate of growth of net earned premium revenue. The increase in ceded reinsurance premium was primarily due to a 9% increase in our catastrophe reinsurance rate effective January 1, 2007 in the dwelling fire and homeowners lines of business, a ramification of the unprecedented hurricane activity in 2004 and 2005.
As mentioned in the overview of this discussion, we expect our overall premium revenue growth rate to remain at modest levels of growth over the next year. The personal lines property and casualty insurance business, in which 89% of total premium revenue is derived, has historically been cyclical in nature with periods of intense price competition among insurers followed by periods of increased pricing flexibility. Due to the increase in hurricane activity over the last year, we are in a cycle where we have been able to obtain significant increases in our rates. Unfortunately, much of the increase has been offset by increased rates that we pay for catastrophe reinsurance. Also, due to regulatory hurdles in developing rates and submitting to various state regulatory agencies, we are unable to adjust the rates we charge as rapidly as reinsurance companies can adjust the rates we pay for catastrophe reinsurance. We have attempted to proactively manage our premium rate adjustments in order to minimize lag time between rate increases we incur on our catastrophe reinsurance and rate adjustments we obtain as a result of these increases. Because we have to obtain rate adjustments in each state in which we operate, we have had mixed results in relation to our ability to obtain quick and adequate rate adjustments. However, overall we feel that we have been able to adequately adjust our rates as needed in the changing environment.
Net investment income:
Net investment income increased 4.1% to $1,213,000 in the first quarter of 2007 compared to $1,165,000 in the first quarter of 2006. This increase is primarily attributable to a 5% increase in invested assets during 2006.
Realized capital gains and losses:
Realized capital gains were down for the quarter as fewer common stock holdings were sold in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the first quarter of 2006. Realized capital gains are subject to significant fluctuations from quarter to quarter and year to year depending on prevailing market conditions and changes in investment mix.
Other income:
Other income decreased 8.0% compared to last year. Other income is primarily composed of insurance related fees in the P&C segment. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in fees associated with the automobile lines of business.
Policyholder benefits and settlement expenses:
Policyholder benefits and settlement expenses decreased $1,472,000 due to a significant decrease in claims activity in the property and casualty subsidiaries and also a decrease in claims in the life subsidiary. As a percentage of premium revenue, policyholder benefits and settlement expenses were 59.2% in the first quarter of 2007 compared to 73.7% in the first quarter of 2006. In the first quarter of 2006, we incurred an extraordinary number of hail related claims. Claims related to hail storm losses were down $305,000 in 2007 compared to the first quarter of 2006. Wind related losses were in line with last year as a percentage of premium revenue despite the increase in wind losses related to a March 2007 tornado outbreak in Alabama. The other major contributor to the decline in first quarter losses in the P&C segment was the auto line of business. The line experienced a 40% decline in total premium revenue; however, incurred losses on the line of business declined 74%, or over $750,000.
17
Policy acquisition costs:
Policy acquisition costs are up $492,000 in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the first quarter of 2006. The increase is partially associated with an increase in premium revenue. The remaining increase is the result of an adjustment in the deferred acquisition cost estimate in the life subsidiary in the first quarter of 2006. This adjustment also contributed to the deferred acquisition cost expense amortization being lower than normal. The total effect of this adjustment was approximately $250,000. Policy acquisition costs in the property and casualty subsidiary, which makes up 85% of total acquisition cost, declined as a percentage of total revenue in the quarter to 18.96% compared to 19.56% in the first quarter of 2006. The elimination of fees paid to general agents to service a block of automobile business is the primary contributor to the decline in policy acquisition cost in the P&C segment.
General and administrative expenses:
General expenses as a percent of earned premium were 16.72% in the first quarter of 2007 compared to 16.33% in the first quarter of 2006. An increase in expenses in the holding company was the primary factor contributing to the slight increase in general expenses. Holding company costs consist primarily of director fees, public company listing fees, and audit related expenses. General expenses were also slightly higher in the property and casualty segment due to increased cost of bringing the operations previously handled by a general agent in-house during 2006. These increased costs were partially offset by a decrease in commissions paid to the general agent. General expenses in the life subsidiary declined $123,000 primarily due to the elimination of litigation cost related to a longstanding class action lawsuit settled in 2006.
Taxes, licenses, and fees:
Taxes, licenses and fees declined to 3.2% of total premium revenue in the first quarter of 2007 compared to 4.5% in the first quarter of last year. The most significant item contributing to this decrease was a decline in fees incurred in association with a periodic examination of insurance subsidiaries conducted by the Alabama Department of Insurance completed in April of 2006. The P&C subsidiaries have also began utilizing insurance premium tax credits in the states of Alabama and Georgia that have contributed to reduction in the amount of insurance premium tax expense in those states.
Interest Expense:
Interest expense is in line with last year as outstanding principal balances on long term trust preferred securities were unchanged in 2007 compared to 2006.
Summary:
We had consolidated net income of $1,183,000 in the first quarter of 2007 compared to a net loss of $141,000 in the first quarter of 2006. The primary driver of the improvement in net income was a significant reduction in the combined ratio in the P&C segment. The combined ratio declined from 105% in the first quarter of 2006 to 92% in the first quarter of 2007. A reduction in hail storm related claims coupled with a significant reduction in claims in the automobile line of business were the primary contributors to the improvement in the combined ratio. Life segment operations also began to turnaround in the first quarter of 2007 as the ongoing cost of a longstanding litigation matter was settled in 2006.
18
Investments:
Investments at March 31, 2007 were down $301,000 compared to December 31, 2006. The lack of positive cash flow from operations for the quarter was the primary reason for total invested assets remaining at approximately the same level throughout the quarter.
The Company considers any fixed income investment with a Standard & Poor’s rating of BB+ or lower to be below investment grade (Commonly referred to as “Junk Bonds”). At March 31, 2007 less than 1% of the Company’s
investment portfolio was invested in fixed income investments rated below investment grade. The Company currently has no bonds in the investment portfolio in default.
The Company monitors its level of investments in debt and equity securities held in issuers of below investment grade debt securities. Management believes the level of such investments is not significant to the Company’s financial condition.
Income taxes:
Income taxes increased for the quarter due to increase in income from operations. Additional information related to the changes in income taxes between current and deferred components can be found in Note 5 of the consolidated financial statements.
Liquidity and capital resources:
At March 31, 2007, the Company had aggregate equity capital, unrealized investment gains (net of income taxes) and retained earnings of $45,897,000 up $518,000 compared to December 31, 2006. The increase reflects a net income of $1,183,000, a decrease in accumulated unrealized investment gains of $110,000, and dividends paid of $555,000.
The Company has $11.5 million in note payable consisting of $9.3 million in trust preferred securities which were issued in December of 2005 and $2.2 million in short term bank debt that was repaid in April. While the short term debt was repaid, we do intend to issue another $3.0 million in trust preferred securities in June of 2007 in order to maintain flexibility in our liquidity position in the holding company. These securities will have a 30 year final maturity.
In addition to the debt discussed in the preceding paragraph, Mobile Attic held $9.4 million in debt. This debt was classified as “held for sale” at March 31, 2007 due to the impending sale of our interest in the Mobile Attic subsidiary. The sale of Mobile Attic was completed in April of 2007 and we have been released from our guarantees of the debt of Mobile Attic. As a result of the sale of Mobile Attic, we will no longer be required to consolidate the operations of Mobile Attic and the $9.4 million in debt will no longer be carried on our balance sheet.
The Company had $262,000 in cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2007. Net cash used by operating activities totaled $94,000 in the first quarter of 2007. The decrease in cash from operations was primarily due to payments that reduced unpaid insurance claims during the period by $1,076,000.
The liquidity requirements of the Company are primarily met by funds provided from operations of the life insurance and property/casualty subsidiaries. The Company receives funds from its subsidiaries consisting of dividends, payments for federal income taxes, and reimbursement of expenses incurred at the corporate level for the subsidiaries. These funds are used to pay stockholder dividends, corporate interest, corporate administrative expenses, federal income taxes, and for funding investments in subsidiaries.
19
The Company’s subsidiaries require cash in order to fund policy acquisition costs, claims, other policy benefits, interest expense, general expenses, and dividends to the Company. Premium and investment income, as well as maturities, calls, and sales of invested assets, provide the primary sources of cash for both subsidiaries. A significant portion of the Company’s investment portfolio consists of readily marketable securities, which can be sold for cash.
The Company’s business is concentrated primarily in the Southeastern United States. Accordingly, unusually severe storms or other disasters in the Southeastern United States might have a more significant effect on the Company than on a more geographically diversified insurance company. Unusually severe storms, other natural disasters and other events could have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and operating results. However, the Company maintains a catastrophe reinsurance program to limit the effect of such catastrophic events on the Company’s financial condition.
20
Item 3. Market Risk Disclosures
The Company’s primary objectives in managing its investment portfolio are to maximize investment income and total investment returns while minimizing overall credit risk. Investment strategies are developed based on many factors including changes in interest rates, overall market conditions, underwriting results, regulatory requirements, and tax position. Investment decisions are made by management and reviewed by the Board of Directors. Market risk represents the potential for loss due to adverse changes in fair value of securities. The three potential risks related to the Company’s fixed maturity portfolio are interest rate risk, prepayment risk, and default risk. The primary risk related to the Company’s equity portfolio is equity price risk. There have been no material changes to the Company’s market risk for the three months ended March 31, 2007. For further information reference is made to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Company management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that all material information required to be filed in this quarterly report has been made known to them in a timely fashion. There have been no significant changes in internal controls, or in factors that could significantly affect internal controls, subsequent to the date the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer completed their evaluation.
21
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION |
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
Please refer to Note 7 to the financial statements. |
|
Item 1A.Risk Factors |
There has been no material change in risk factors previously disclosed under Item 1A. of the |
Company’s annual report for 2006 on Form 10-K. |
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None |
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None |
|
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None |
|
Item 5. Other Information |
None |
|
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
|
a. Exhibits |
|
11. Computation of Earnings Per Share Filed Herewith, See Note 3 to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
31.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
31.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
b. Reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended March 31, 2007 |
|
Date of Report | | Date Filed | | Description | |
| | | | | | | | | |
January 22, 2007 | | January 22, 2007 | | Press release, dated January 22, 2007, issued by The National Security Group, Inc. |
February 23, 2007 | | February 23, 2007 | | Press release, dated February 23, 2007, issued by The National Security Group, Inc. |
February 26, 2007 | | February 26, 2007 | | Press release, dated February 26, 2007, issued by The National Security Group, Inc. |
| | | | | | | | | |
22
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed by the undersigned duly authorized officer, on its behalf and in the capacity indicated.
The National Security Group, Inc.
/s/ William L. Brunson, Jr. | | /s/ Brian R. McLeod |
William L. Brunson, Jr. | | Brian R. McLeod |
President and Chief Executive Officer | | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
Dated: May 15, 2007
23
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, William L. Brunson, Jr. certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The National Security Group, Inc.; |
| | |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| | |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| | |
4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: |
| | |
| | |
| (a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| | |
| (b) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| | |
| (c) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
| | |
5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| | |
| (a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| | |
| (b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: May 15, 2007
|
/s/ William L. Brunson, Jr. |
|
|
William L. Brunson, Jr. Chief Executive Officer |
24
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Brian R. McLeod, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The National Security Group, Inc.; |
| | |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| | |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| | |
4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: |
| | |
| | |
| (a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| | |
| (b) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| | |
| (c) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
| | |
5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| | |
| (a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| | |
| (b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: May 15, 2007
|
/s/ Brian R. McLeod |
|
|
Brian R. McLeod, CPA Chief Financial Officer |
25
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of the National Security Group, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | | | |
| | /s/ William L. Brunson, Jr. |
Date: May 15, 2007 | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | Name: William L. Brunson, Jr. Title: Chief Executive Officer |
26
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of The National Security Group, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | | | |
| | /s/ Brian R. McLeod |
Date: May 15. 2007 | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | Name: Brian R. McLeod, CPA Title: Chief Financial Officer |
27