Premium revenue in the life insurance subsidiary, NSIC accounts for 12.7% of total premium income of the Company. NSIC has two primary methods of distribution of insurance products: employee agents and independent agents. Employee agents primarily consist of home service agents that sell policies and collect premium primarily in the insured’s home. Revenue from business in-force serviced by home service agents accounts for 35% of total NSIC premium revenue. This has been the primary method of product distribution for NSIC since it’s founding in 1947. Changing demographics has necessitated a need to diversify to alternative means of distribution. In an effort to increase production of new business and penetrate markets in states outside of Alabama, NSIC began appointing independent agents in 1998. Independent agents now account for over 87% of all new business production in NSIC. Revenue from business in-force serviced by independent agents accounts for 56% of total NSIC premium revenue. In addition to the two primary methods of product distribution, approximately 8% of premium revenue is generated from the servicing of discontinued books of business and inactive programs. The most significant of these discontinued books of business is a block of policies acquired by NSIC from another carrier in 2000.
Premium revenue in NSIC consists of traditional life insurance products and supplemental accident and health products. As set forth in the preceding table, traditional life insurance premium revenue increased 5.1% for the nine-month period ending September 30, 2008 compared to the same period last year. Accident and health insurance premium revenue decreased 1.5%. In total NSIC premium revenue is up 3.6% for the year to date in 2008 compared to the same period last year, driven primarily by sales of new products through the independent agent sales force.
The biggest challenge for NSIC in maintaining higher levels of premium growth remains the ability to retain in force business once it is issued, referred to in the industry as persistency. NSIC primarily serves the lower and middle income markets with lower face value life insurance products (typically $50,000 and below) and supplemental accident and health insurance products. While we believe our customers typically view our products as an important part of their financial plan, our products are also viewed by many lower to middle income households as discretionary in nature and are subject to being cancelled for non-payment of premium in the event of a decline in household income due to job loss or other economic factors. NSIC typically loses as much as 40% of new business produced in a year due to non-payment of premium. Over the past two years, our marketing department has been working to penetrate the worksite market of stable industries in our areas of distribution. Worksite marketing typically involves the sale of products at the customer’s place of employment. Payment of premium is typically facilitated through payroll deduction with the employer. We believe that penetrating this market and method of product distribution will improve our persistency as it continues to develop. Premium produced through worksite marketing currently accounts for approximately 12% of life segment premium revenue.
Premium revenue in the property/casualty insurance subsidiaries decreased 10.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period last year. The primary reasons for the decline relate to an overall decrease in the production of new business as well as the increase in ceded premium from the payment of reinstatement premium triggered by Hurricane Gustav. Additional factors contributing to the slowing premium revenue growth compared to prior years relates to the implementation of stricter underwriting standards and fewer new independent agent appointments.
Premium revenue in the dwelling fire line of business decreased 3.0%, or just over $605,000 in the first nine months of 2008 compared to the same period last year. In addition, the homeowners program ended third quarter 2008 with a 6.9% year to date decline in premium revenue compared to 2007. These lines of business composed 43.4% and 43.5%, respectively of premium revenue in 2007 compared to 46.2% and 44.5%, respectively during 2008. The current economic environment along with soft market conditions are the primary factors that have contributed to the decrease on premium revenue. We have experience increased lapse rates that we primarily attribute to current economic conditions as policyholders are typically lower to middle income households and are likely to feel the pinch on household budgets more rapidly in an economic downturn.
Reinsurance premium ceded increased 27.5% in the first nine months of 2008 compared to the same period last year. The primary reason for the increase was the payment of reinstatement premiums triggered by Hurricane Gustav.
Net investment income is up $116,000 for the quarter and $265,000 for the year to date in 2008 compared to the same period last year primarily due to an increase in book yields on debt securities in 2008.
Realized capital gains and losses:
Realized investment losses totaled $1,304,000 in the first nine months of 2008, down significantly from the realized investment gains of $529,000 realized in the first nine months of 2007. Realized losses were generated primarily from the recognition of other than temporary impairments totaling $1,722,000. The other than temporary impairment losses realized were partially offset by realized capital gain on equity investments of $418,000. In determining whether or not unrealized losses are other-than-temporary impairments, the Company does not use set thresholds as exclusive reliance on thresholds removes the ability of management to apply its judgment, a concept that is inherent to the analysis of impairments. All unrealized losses are reviewed to determine whether the losses are other than temporary. Management utilizes positive and negative information on an investment by investment basis to make the determination as to whether an unrealized loss is other-than-temporary. Impairment losses recognized on bond investments totaled $805,000 and consisted of $566,000 in losses on bonds of Lehman Brothers and $239,000 in losses on Washington Mutual bonds. In addition to losses in the bond portfolio, the Company realized losses of $453,000 and $464,000 respectively on preferred stock holdings of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Federal National Mortgage Corporation respectively. Realized gains are generated primarily from the sale of equity portfolio investments of the insurance subsidiaries. An investment committee composed of senior company management manages these investments. We will sell or decrease positions in certain investment holdings only as market conditions warrant which can lead to significant fluctuations in realized capital gains from quarter to quarter and year to year.
Other income:
Other income increased $107,000 in the first nine months compared to last year and declined $7,000 for the quarter. Other income is primarily composed of insurance related fees tied to the non-standard auto line of business. The decrease in fees is primarily attributable to the decline in non-standard auto premium production.
Policyholder benefits and settlement expenses:
Policyholder benefits and settlement expenses (claims) have increased significantly compared to the three month and nine month periods ended September 30 of last year. For the three month period ended September 30, 2008, claims were $15,795,000, or 134.9% of premium revenue, an increase of 76.9% compared to third quarter of last year which totaled $8,927,000, or 56.1% of premium revenue. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, claims totaled $37,167,000 or 87.9% of premium revenue, compared to $28,259,000 last year which totaled 60.95% of premium revenue. The increase in claims is primarily attributable to third quarter hurricane losses from Hurricanes Gustav and Ike. Hurricane losses from insurance claims incurred from Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike, net of reinsurance, totaled $8,940,000.
Year to date incurred losses and incurred adjustment expenses in the property and casualty companies totaled $33,600,000 compared to $24,900,000 for the same period last year. The primary reason for the significant increase was the unprecedented storm activity during the first half of 2008 combined with the losses related to both Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike. Nineteen storms classified as catastrophic events by the Property Claims Service affected the property and casualty companies. These storms were characterized by significant damage from tornadoes and high wind. As of September 30, 2008, the losses from these storms totaled $18,600,000 before reinsurance. Hurricane Gustav made landfall on the Louisiana coast with winds of 110 miles per hour on September 1, 2008. Incurred losses and incurred adjustment expenses from this storm added $10,100,000 to total incurred claims through the end of third quarter 2008. Less than two weeks later, Hurricane Ike made landfall on the Texas coast as a category two storm on September 13, 2008. The impact of this storm generated incurred losses and incurred adjustment expenses totaling $3,500,000 as of September 30, 2008. While the company maintains reinsurance to mitigate the effects of catastrophic events such as Hurricanes Gustav and Ike, the Company incurs 100% of losses from each event up to a $3,500,000 retention per event under its catastrophe reinsurance agreement. Upon penetration of the first layer of coverage, beginning at losses in excess of $3,500,000 per event, the company retains 5% co-insurance on losses up to $17,500,000 before 100% reinsurance coverage begins until the maximum reinsurance payout of $57,500,000 has been paid.
Policy acquisition costs:
Policy acquisition costs for the third quarter of 2008 totaled 29% of net premium revenue earned compared to 19% last year. The increase in the ratio of acquisition cost to premium revenue was primarily caused by the increase in net reinsurance premium ceded due to the triggering of a catastrophe reinstatement premium caused by Hurricane Gustav. For the year to date in 2008, policy acquisition costs are 22% of premium revenue compared to 20% for the same period last year. Again, the year to date increase in policy acquisition costs as a percent of premium revenue is the reduction in premium revenue caused by the additional ceded premium paid to reinstate catastrophe reinsurance coverage after the occurrence of Hurricane Gustav.
22
General insurance expenses:
General expenses
General expenses for the third quarter totaled 18% of premium revenue compared to 14% for the same period last year.
Again, the decrease in earned premium due to an increase in reinsurance ceded due to a catastrophe reinstatement premium is the primary factor contributing to the increase in general expenses as a percent of premium revenue for the quarter. For the year to date in 2008, general expenses totaled 16% of premium revenue compared to 15% for the same period last year and the decrease in year to date earned premium due to additional catastrophe reinstatement premium was the primary factor contributing to the increase in general expenses as a percent of earned premium.
Taxes, licenses, and fees:
Insurance taxes, licenses and fees decreased $257,000 for the quarter and $582,000 for the year to date. The decrease is due to declines in premium revenue for the quarter and year to date.
Interest expense:
Interest expense for the third quarter of 2008 decreased $14,000. This decrease is primarily attributable to the repayment of a $900,000 bank credit line earlier in 2008. Interest expense is up $53,000 for the year due to a higher average balance outstanding on the credit line in the first five months of 2008 compared to 2007.
Income taxes:
The effective tax rate for the three month period ended September 30, 2008 was 32.7% compared to 26.7% for the same period last year and the effective tax rate for the nine month period ended September 30, 2008 was 34.4% compared to 25.4% for the same period last year. Significant losses sustained in the property and casualty subsidiaries have generated significant tax benefits for the quarter and year to date in 2008. Because the effective tax rate in the property and casualty subsidiaries is higher than in the life subsidiary coupled with the higher percentage of total net losses generated from property and casualty subsidiaries the effective tax rate increased in 2008 compared to 2007. Because the property and casualty companies posted profitable results in each of the prior two years, it is expected that the tax benefit of any net operating losses for 2008 will be recovered immediately through carry back provisions of the Federal Tax Code.
Discontinued operations:
As discussed earlier, in April of 2007 we disposed of the majority of our investment in Mobile Attic. The sale included all assets of Mobile Attic and the buyer assumed all Mobile Attic liabilities. Proceeds in excess of assets sold and liabilities assumed by the seller totaled $2,700,000. The net of tax gain on the sale of Mobile Attic was $1,460,000. After deducting a loss from discontinued operations for the first quarter of 2007, net income from discontinued operations for Mobile Attic for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 totaled $1,319,000.
Summary:
Premium revenue for the third quarter of 2008 totaled $11,707,000 a decrease of 26% over third quarter 2007 which totaled $15,913,000. For the year to date, premium revenue totaled $42,261,000, a decrease of 8.8% compared to the year to date in 2007 of $46,362,000. The decrease in earned premium in 2008 is primarily attributable to decreases in the property and casualty subsidiaries two largest lines of business, dwelling fire and homeowners, of 3.0% and 6.9% respectively coupled with a 27.5% increase in reinsurance ceded premium caused primarily by a catastrophe reinstatement premium triggered by Hurricane Gustav in the third quarter of 2008.
Net investment income increased $116,000 in the third quarter of 2008 to $1,332,000 compared to last year and increased for the year to date in 2008 by $265,000 to $3,894,000 due to an increase in the average book yield of bond investments. Net investment income is expected to decline in the fourth quarter as invested assets have decreased due to increased cash outflows to pay hurricane claims.
23
The Company has a net loss from continuing operations for the third quarter of 2008 of ($6,945,000) compared to net income of $1,505,000 for the third quarter of 2007. The most significant factors affecting net income were hurricane losses and the recognition of other than temporary impairments.
For the year to date in 2008, the Company has a loss from continuing operations of ($6,199,000) compared to income of $3,169,000 in 2007. Third quarter hurricane and investment losses were the primary factors contributing to the year to date loss in 2008.
For the year to date in 2007, the Company had net income from discontinued operations of $1,319,000 primarily associated with a net of tax gain on disposal of Mobile Attic of $1,460,000. The Company sold its stake in Mobile Attic in the second quarter of 2007.
For the first nine months of 2008, the Company has a net loss of $6,199,000 compared to income of $4,488,000 for the first nine months of 2007. The most significant items contributing to the decline in net income were losses from Hurricanes Gustav and Ike discussed earlier under policyholder benefits.
Investments:
Invested assets at September 30, 2008 declined $10,960,000 compared to December 31, 2007. Approximately $2,500,000 of the decrease in invested assets is due to increased liquidity needs associated with the payment of hurricane claims. Approximately $2,300,000 of the decrease in investments was due to a decline in the value of equity investments. The remaining decrease in the value of investments totaling $6,100,000 was primarily due to declines in market value of fixed income investments. Out of the $6,100,000 total decline in value of fixed income investments, $1,700,000 in impairments were deemed other than temporary. These investments consisted of bonds of Lehman Brothers, Washington Mutual and preferred stock of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Federal National Mortgage Corporation. The remaining decline in value of fixed income investments totaling approximately $4,400,000 consisted of declines in market values of available for sale securities. The Company has evaluated each of the remaining securities in a loss position and based on currently available information does not consider these investments to be other than temporarily impaired and expects to recover the decline in value of these investments prior to sell or maturity.
We held fixed maturities and equity securities with unrealized losses representing declines that we considered temporary at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 as follows:
| | | September 30, 2008 | |
| | | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| | | Total | | | | | |
| | | | | Gross | | Total | |
| | | Fair | | Unrealized | | Securities in a |
| | | Value | | Losses | | Loss Position |
Fixed maturities | | | | | | | |
| Corporate | $ | 22,049 | $ | 4,423 | | 64 | |
| Mortgage backed securities | | 8,255 | | 261 | | 31 | |
| Obligations of state and | | | | | | | |
| political subdivisions | | 9,974 | | 1,129 | | 32 | |
| U.S. Treasury securities and | | | | | | | |
| obligations of U.S. government | | | | | | | |
| corporations and agencies | | 2,333 | | 23 | | 5 | |
Equity securities | | 1,896 | | 703 | | 12 | |
| | $ | 44,507 | $ | 6,539 | | 144 | |
24
| | | December 31, 2007 | |
| | | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| | | Total | | | | | |
| | | | | Gross | | Total | |
| | | Fair | | Unrealized | | Securities in a |
| | | Value | | Losses | | Loss Position |
Fixed maturities | | | | | | | |
| Corporate | $ | 8,624 | $ | 554 | | 27 | |
| Mortgage backed securities | | 13,777 | | 365 | | 36 | |
| Obligations of state and | | | | | | | |
| political subdivisions | | 6,393 | | 144 | | 21 | |
| U.S. Treasury securities and | | | | | | | |
| obligations of U.S. government | | | | | | | |
| corporations and agencies | | 5,137 | | 27 | | 12 | |
Equity securities | | 1,975 | | 742 | | 9 | |
| | $ | 35,906 | $ | 1,832 | | 105 | |
In determining whether or not unrealized losses are other-than-temporary impairments, the Company does not use set thresholds as exclusive reliance on thresholds removes the ability of management to apply its judgment, a concept that is inherent to the analysis of impairments. All unrealized losses are reviewed to determine whether the losses are other than temporary. Management utilizes positive and negative information on an investment by investment basis to make the determination as to whether an unrealized loss is other-than-temporary. Items that are considered include: the nature of the investment, the cause or causes of the impairment, the number of investment positions that are in an unrealized loss position, the severity and duration of the impairment, industry analyst reports, credit ratings, volatility of the security’s fair value, whether the securities are backed by the U.S. Government or its agencies, the Company’s intent and ability to hold the security and other factors deemed relevant by management. Management has evaluated each security in a significant unrealized loss position. Most unrealized losses in the fixed income portfolio are interest rate driven as opposed to credit quality driven and management believes no ultimate loss will be realized. As of September 30, 2008 we determined that our investments in preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae as well as debt securities issued by Lehman Brothers and Washington Mutual which were trading below cost had declined on an other than temporary basis. We included losses of $1,722,000 in net realized investment gains (losses) for these investments in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The Company considers any fixed income investment with a Standard & Poor’s rating of BB+ or lower to be below investment grade (commonly referred to as “Junk Bonds”). At September 30, 2008 the Company has no material exposure to sub-prime mortgage loans and approximately 1.5% of the Company’s investment portfolio was invested in fixed income investments rated below investment grade. The Company currently has no bonds in the investment portfolio in default. The Company monitors its level of investments in debt and equity securities held in issuers of below investment grade debt securities. Management believes the level of such investments is not material to the Company’s financial condition.
In light of the recent financial crisis in the credit market, we have undertaken a review of our entire fixed income investment portfolio. We do own considerable amounts of mortgage related debt securities in our investment portfolio; however, we have no material exposure to the most heavily impacted segment of the credit market dealing primarily with private label sub-prime mortgage backed securities. The majority of our mortgage security related holdings (including CMO’s) were issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association (FHLMC). We have not experienced changes in market values of these securities other than those caused by factors impacting interest rate markets overall.
We also do not own any collateralized debt obligations (CDO’s) related to credit card receivables or other segments of the consumer credit market that may face pressure in the event of an economic downturn. However, we do own a $1,500,000 bond investment in consumer finance company American General, a subsidiary of AIG. This debt has incurred a significant decline in market value due to recent market turmoil and its association as a subsidiary of maligned American International Group (AIG). These securities are currently investment grade and based on presently available information, we do not expect to incur impairment charges on these securities. However, we did incur a net of tax decrease in capital of approximately $600,000 associated with mark to market declines in value of these securities. While we do own corporate bonds in our portfolio that could face additional pressure in a prolonged economic slowdown, corporate bonds currently compose less than 15% of our bond portfolio and is primarily comprised of investment grade issues with issuers having total debt to capital levels of less than 40%. The majority of our bond investment portfolio remains in government, agency and insured municipal bond investments that we believe positions us well for the long term. We also face no immediate liquidity issues that would force us to sell assets at currently distressed prices in order to meet short term liquidity needs.
25
Liquidity and capital resources:
At September 30, 2008, the Company had aggregate equity capital, unrealized investment gains (net of income taxes) and retained earnings of $35,106,000 down $13,341,000 compared to December 31, 2007. Hurricane losses and realized investment losses due to impairment write downs coupled with declines in market values of fixed income and equity securities were the primary factors contributing to the decline in the Company’s total equity capital. Capital position was impacted by a decline in market value of the Company’s investment portfolio of approximately 5% which led to a decline in accumulated unrealized capital gains of $5,433,000. Also affecting the Company’s capital position were an unrealized loss on interest rate swap of $44,000 and dividends paid of $1,665,000. While the decline in the Company’s capital position due to these unprecedented events of the last quarter have been significant, the Company remains well capitalized at levels that are sufficient to support current business plans.
The Company has $12,372,000 in debt outstanding consisting long term debt from the proceeds of two separate trust preferred securities issuances, the latest of which totaled $3,000,000 and was completed in June of 2007. The Company currently does not anticipate any new borrowings.
The Company had $3,134,000 in cash and short term investments at September 30, 2008. Net cash used by operating activities totaled $62,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and was primarily generated by operations of the property and casualty insurance subsidiaries. Liquidity needs will increase early in the fourth quarter as the large majority of claim payments associated with Hurricanes Gustav and Ike will be paid. However, the Company is well positioned to manage current liquidity needs and does not expect to have to sell significant amounts of investments at current distressed prices in order to pay claims.
The liquidity requirements of the Company are primarily met by funds provided from operations of the life insurance and property/casualty subsidiaries. The Company receives funds from its subsidiaries consisting of dividends, payments for federal income taxes, and reimbursement of expenses incurred at the corporate level for the subsidiaries. These funds are used to pay stockholder dividends, corporate interest, corporate administrative expenses, federal income taxes, and for funding investments in subsidiaries.
The Company’s subsidiaries require cash in order to fund policy acquisition costs, claims, other policy benefits, interest expense, general expenses, and dividends to the Company. Premium and investment income, as well as maturities, calls, and sales of invested assets, provide the primary sources of cash for both subsidiaries. A significant portion of the Company’s investment portfolio consists of readily marketable securities, which can be sold for cash.
The Company’s business is concentrated primarily in the Southeastern United States. Accordingly, unusually severe storms or other disasters in the Southeastern United States might have a more significant effect on the Company than on a more geographically diversified insurance company. However, the Company maintains a catastrophe reinsurance program to limit the effect of such catastrophic events on the Company’s financial condition. The Company deductible under the terms of the reinsurance contract totals $3,500,000 however; the Company maintains cash and short term investments in sufficient amounts to cover the deductible payment in the event of a catastrophic event.
Discussion of dividend policy:
In a press release issued in October of 2008, The National Security Group, Inc. informed shareholders of a revision in the Company’s dividend policy. The material content of this press release follows:
The Company has a 30-year history of providing a steady return on investment through the payment of dividends to shareholders. These dividends have contributed significantly to total shareholder return and have provided a steady, predictable income stream that is important to a large portion of our shareholder base.
Three significant events have occurred in 2008 that have forced us to revise our dividend policy. First, we have encountered an unusually high frequency of catastrophe related losses. In the first half of 2008 we incurred over $2,900,000 (net of tax) in tornado and windstorm-related losses. In September of 2008 we incurred significant losses from Hurricanes Gustav and Ike, primarily in Louisiana and Texas. Losses from these two storms will cost in excess of $5,900,000 net of reinsurance. The unprecedented frequency of storm activity will significantly reduce our 2008 earnings and capital position. While we remain adequately capitalized, we must focus on restoring capital levels in order to focus on long term growth and maximization of shareholder value.
26
Second, the recent adverse developments in the financial markets have affected our investments. We will incur charges to third quarter earnings of $1,200,000 (net of tax) for other than temporary impairments to investments we hold in our portfolio. We will also incur reductions to our capital due to mark to market accounting rules that will adversely affect many of our corporate bond holdings and equity investments. We expect to ultimately recover substantially all of the reductions not related to other than temporary impairments, but will incur near term reductions in our capital position that must be addressed now.
Third, due to the unprecedented events that have unfolded in the global financial markets over the last few months we believe the ability to raise new capital in the financial sector, especially for smaller public companies, is going to be severely restricted. Further, if capital becomes available, we believe it will be more expensive. Therefore, we believe it prudent to adopt a more conservative dividend payout policy in order to rebuild the balance sheet strength of the Company. We are confident this will ultimately maximize long-term shareholder value.
As a consequence of these events, we are undertaking a comprehensive plan to restore and grow capital to help us take advantage of the opportunities that lie ahead. As part of this plan the Board of Directors has adopted a new dividend policy effective for 2009 under which our anticipated quarterly dividend payouts will be reduced from $0.225 per share to $0.15 per share. The Board will work with management each year to determine if our financial position will allow for any enhanced dividends to be paid, based upon the operating results of the Company and our anticipated near term capital needs. We believe these changes are in the best long term interests of the Company and our shareholders, and strike a compromise between maintaining a return to shareholders and ensuring a solid capital position for the Company.
27
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company’s primary objectives in managing its investment portfolio are to maximize investment income and total investment returns while minimizing overall credit risk. Investment strategies are developed based on many factors including changes in interest rates, overall market conditions, underwriting results, regulatory requirements, and tax position. Investment decisions are made by management and reviewed by the Board of Directors. Market risk represents the potential for loss due to adverse changes in fair value of securities. The three potential risks related to the Company’s fixed maturity portfolio are interest rate risk, prepayment risk, and default risk. The primary risk related to the Company’s equity portfolio is equity price risk. The Company has incurred material losses in its investment portfolio in the first nine months of 2008 due to interest rate changes, defaults on certain securities and changes in value of equity investments. These changes are discussed in detail under Item 2 of this Form 10-Q. For further information reference is made to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2008. Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
There has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13A-15(d) under the Exchange Act that occurred during the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
28
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
Please refer to Note 7 to the financial statements. |
|
Item 1A.Risk Factors |
There has been no material change in risk factors previously disclosed under Item 1A. of the |
Company’s annual report for 2007 on Form 10-K. |
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None |
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None |
|
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None |
|
Item 5. Other Information |
None |
|
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
a. Exhibits |
|
11. Computation of Earnings Per Share Filed Herewith, See Note 3 to Consolidated Financial |
Statements. |
|
31.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the |
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|
31.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the |
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|
32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the |
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|
32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the |
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|
|
b. Reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Date of Report | | Date Filed | | Description |
| | | | | | | | | |
September 8, 2008 | | September 8, 2008 | | Press release, dated September 8, 2008, issued by The National Security Group, Inc. |
August 14, 2008 | | August 18, 2008 | | Press release, dated August 14, 2008, issued by The National Security Group, Inc. |
August 14, 2008 | | August 15, 2008 | | Press release, dated August 14, 2008, issued by The National Security Group, Inc. |
July 21, 2008 | | July 21, 2008 | | Press release, dated July 21, 2008, issued by The National Security Group, Inc. |
| | | | | | | | | |
29
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed by the undersigned duly authorized officer, on its behalf and in the capacity indicated.
The National Security Group, Inc.
/s/ William L. Brunson, Jr. | | /s/ Brian R. McLeod |
William L. Brunson, Jr. | | Brian R. McLeod |
President and Chief Executive Officer | | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
Dated: November 13, 2008
30