Current year incurred catastrophe related losses added 14.4 percentage points to the six month period loss ratio of 69.95% while catastrophe related storm losses added only 2.6 percentage points to the loss ratio of 63.49% in 2007. Without the impact of catastrophe related losses, our underlying loss ratio improved 5.34 percentage points due primarily to a decline in the frequency of fire related losses.
The property/casualty subsidiaries incurred numerous storm related losses in the first half of 2008 due to a string of wind and tornado events that began in late January and continued through May. The storm activity caused damage from strong wind, hail and tornados generating losses in nine of the states in which our companies produce business. The dwelling property and homeowners lines of business were severely impacted by these events with catastrophe losses exceeding $4.4 million in the first six months of 2008 compared to slightly over $800,000 in 2007. While the frequency of storm activity increased significantly in the first half of 2008, none of the storms officially classified as catastrophic events reached the level of severity to trigger coverage under our catastrophe reinsurance contract.
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, policyholder benefits were 77.4% of earned premium compared to 67.98% for the same period in 2007. Catastrophe losses for the period in 2008 totaled $2,113,000 compared to only $204,000 in the second quarter of 2007.
Policy acquisition costs are directly related to the production of earned premium. As a percentage of premiums earned, policy acquisition costs were 19.26% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 versus 20.48% for the same period last year. The decrease in policy acquisition costs is related to the reduction in contingent commission accrual estimates due to the decline in property and casualty underwriting profitability.
For the three month period ended June 30, 2008, policy acquisition cost was 18.9% of earned premium revenue compared to 21.3% for the same period last year. The revision in the estimate for contingent commission accruals was the primary reason for the decline in policy acquisition cost for the quarter.
General and administrative expenses are down moderately for the six month period at 14.66% of earned premium compared to 15.1% in 2007. The moderate decline is primarily due to a slight decline in administrative expenses in the holding company.
General and administrative expenses are unchanged for the three month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period last year at 13.3% of earned premium.
Taxes, licenses and fees totaled 2.5% of earned premium revenue for the first six months of 2008 compared to 3.6% last year. A decline in regulatory assessments was the primary reason for the decline in taxes, licenses and fees compared to the first six months of last year.
Interest expense increased $67,000 in the first six months of 2008 compared to the same period last year. Increased interest expense associated with a short term bank loan was the primary reason for the increase in interest expense for the period. The loan was paid off early in the second quarter of 2008.
Interest expense increased $48,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period last year due to the previously mentioned short term bank loan which was repaid by the end of the second quarter.
Income taxes:
Income taxes as a percentage of pre-tax income decreased significantly in the first six months of 2008 at 13.66% compared to 24.16% for the same period last year. Due to poor underwriting results in the property and casualty subsidiary, a larger percentage of earnings was generated in the much smaller life insurance subsidiary which has a significantly lower effective tax rate.
Discontinued Operations:
As discussed earlier, in April of 2007 we disposed of the majority of our investment in Mobile Attic. The sale included all assets of Mobile Attic and the buyer assumed all Mobile Attic liabilities. Proceeds in excess of assets sold and liabilities assumed by the seller totaled $2,700,000. The net of tax gain on the sale of Mobile Attic was $1,460,000. After deducting a loss from discontinued operations for the first quarter of 2007, net income from discontinued operations for Mobile Attic for the six months ended June 30, 2007 totaled $1,319,000.
Summary:
Net income from Continuing Operations totaled $746,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $1,664,000 for the same period last year. As covered earlier in this discussion, increased claims related expenses incurred due to a much higher frequency of storm related losses was the primary factor contributing to the decline in net income from continuing operations.
Net income was $746,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 or $0.30 per share compared to $2,983,000 or $1.21 per share for the same period last year. Net income from Discontinued Operations attributable to the sale of our investment in Mobile Attic in April of 2007 added $1,319,000, or $0.54 per share to last year’s earnings.
Investments:
Investments at June 30, 2008 were down $2,777,000 compared to December 31, 2007. Decline in market value of equity securities was the primary factor contributing to the decline in equity investments. A lack of positive cash flow from insurance operations also limited our ability to grow invested assets during the first half of 2008.
While we have incurred declines in market values of securities primarily in our equity portfolio and to a lesser extent in our bond portfolio, we have not incurred any material adverse consequences related to investments in our bond portfolio. Our conservative approach in the debt markets has limited our exposure to sub-prime mortgage backed securities and collateralized debt obligations which have led to significant write downs in asset values for many companies. Our bond portfolio remains composed of over 98% investment grade securities and we currently have no securities in default. We also have no securities in our portfolio which, in our judgment based on currently available information, we deem to be other than temporarily impaired.
The Company considers any fixed income investment with a Standard & Poor’s rating of BB+ or lower to be below investment grade (Commonly referred to as “Junk Bonds”). At June 30, 2008 less than 2% of the Company’s investment portfolio was invested in fixed income investments rated below investment grade. The Company currently has no bonds in the investment portfolio in default.
The Company monitors its level of investments in debt and equity securities held in issuers of below investment grade debt securities. Management believes the level of such investments is not significant to the Company’s financial condition.
Other invested assets increased $5,400,000 compared to December 31, 2007. The increase was due to a $2,500,000 million allocation to corporate owned life insurance (COLI) completed in February of 2008 and a $3,000,000 allocation to Alabama premium tax credits. These investments were primarily undertaken to improve after tax returns on invested assets and in the case of the COLI to insure the lives of certain key employees of the organization to provide a life insurance benefit to the Company in the event of the death of certain key employees.
Policy receivables:
Policy receivables include amounts due from agents and amounts due from policyholders, primarily for balances booked but deferred and not yet due. Policy receivables have increased due to a change in the method of policy issuance by the Company. Historically, the Company has issued insurance policies with expiration dates that correspond to the associated quarterly, semi-annual or annual payment method, commonly referred to as a continuous policy. In 2006, the Company began the implementation of a new policy administration system. The new system issues annual policies regardless of mode of payment selected by the policyholder. Consequently, amounts are booked as receivable from the customer when the policy is issued for the entire annual policy period and the receivable is reduced as monthly, quarterly or semi-annual installments are made. The phase-in of this
22
new system will cause an increase in policy receivables and a corresponding increase in unearned premiums. In late 2007 we began the process of implementing this new system in our largest states of Alabama and Mississippi which has led to a significant increase in policy receivables and corresponding increase in unearned premium in the first six months of 2008. Since we are well over half way through the conversion process in our two largest states, we do not expect any further material increase in policy receivables going forward.
Accounts receivable:
Accounts receivable included remaining amounts due from Mobile Attic. This receivable balance was collected in 2008.
Property and Equipment:
There has been no material change in property and equipment in the first six months of 2008 compared to December 31, 2007.
Unearned premiums:
As discussed previously under policy receivables, unearned premiums increased due to a change in our policy administration system to begin issuing annual contracts in our property and casualty subsidiaries (six months for auto) regardless of mode of payment. This change has led to an increase in policy receivables for contracts paid on other than an annual basis and is offset by a corresponding increase in unearned premium set to match the annual contract period. This change has no impact on earned premium or any other component of operating results and impacts these two balance sheet items only.
Short term debt:
Short term debt consisted of a $900,000 loan from a local bank and was paid off during the second quarter of 2008.
Long term debt:
Long term debt consists of previously issued trust preferred securities and is unchanged from December 31, 2007.
Liquidity and capital resources:
At June 30, 2008, the Company had aggregate equity capital, unrealized investment gains (net of income taxes) and retained earnings of $45,263,000 down $3,184,000 compared to December 31, 2007. The decrease reflects net income of $746,000, a decrease in accumulated unrealized investment gains associated with available for sale securities of $2,805,000, a loss on an interest rate swap of $15,000 and dividends paid of $1,109,000.
At June 30, 2008, the Company had $12,372,000 in long term debt, unchanged since December 31, 2007.
Long term debt consists of a $9.3 million loan with a fixed interest rate until December of 2015 and a final maturity of December 15, 2035 and a $3.1 million loan with a floating interest rate and a final maturity of June 15, 2037.
The Company had $59,000 in cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2008. Net cash used in operating activities totaled $346,000 in the first six months of 2008 primarily due to increased property and casualty claim expenses.
23
The liquidity requirements of the Company are primarily met by funds provided from operations of the life insurance and property/casualty subsidiaries. The Company receives funds from its subsidiaries consisting of dividends, payments for federal income taxes and reimbursement of expenses incurred at the corporate level for the subsidiaries. These funds are used to pay stockholder dividends, corporate interest, corporate administrative expenses, federal income taxes and for funding investments in subsidiaries.
The Company’s subsidiaries require cash in order to fund policy acquisition costs, claims, other policy benefits, interest expense, general expenses and dividends to the Company. Premium and investment income, as well as maturities, calls, and sales of invested assets, provide the primary sources of cash for both subsidiaries. A significant portion of the Company’s investment portfolio consists of readily marketable securities, which can be sold for cash.
The Company’s business is concentrated primarily in the Southeastern United States. Accordingly, unusually severe storms or other disasters in the Southeastern United States might have a more significant effect on the Company than on a more geographically diversified insurance company. Unusually severe storms, other natural disasters and other events could have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and operating results. However, the Company maintains a catastrophe reinsurance program to limit the effect of such catastrophic events on the Company’s financial condition.
With the addition of a $15 million reinsurance layer in July of 2008, the company has reinsurance to cover a single catastrophic event in 2008 up to $57.5 million subject to a $3.5 million deductible. This catastrophe reinsurance facility was not utilized in the first six months of 2008 as none of the catastrophic events incurred exceeded our retention limit of $3.5 million per event.
24
Item 3. Market Risk Disclosures
The Company’s primary objectives in managing its investment portfolio are to maximize investment income and total investment returns while minimizing overall credit risk. Investment strategies are developed based on many factors including changes in interest rates, overall market conditions, underwriting results, regulatory requirements, and tax position. Investment decisions are made by management and reviewed by the Board of Directors. Market risk represents the potential for loss due to adverse changes in fair value of securities. The three potential risks related to the Company’s fixed maturity portfolio are interest rate risk, prepayment risk, and default risk. The primary risk related to the Company’s equity portfolio is equity price risk. There have been no material changes to the Company’s market risk for the six months ended June 30, 2008. For further information reference is made to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2008. Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
There has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13A-15(d) under the Exchange Act that occurred during the six month period ended June 30, 2008, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
25
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION |
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
Please refer to Note 7 to the financial statements. |
|
Item 1A.Risk Factors |
There has been no material change in risk factors previously disclosed under Item 1A. of the |
Company’s annual report for 2008 on Form 10-K. |
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None |
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None |
|
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 1, 2008. The following proposals were |
adopted by the margins indicated: |
1. The election as directors of the FIVE (5) nominees listed below to serve 3-year terms, and until heir successors are duly elected and qualified |
Nominee | | For |
Winfield Baird | | 91.8% |
W. L. Brunson, Jr. | | 91.8% |
Fred Clark, Jr. | | 91.8% |
Mickey L. Murdock | | 91.8% |
Paul Wesch | | 91.8% |
2. To ratify selection of Barfield, Murphy, Shank & Smith, PC of Birmingham, Alabama as the Company’s independent auditors for 2008. There were no revocations of proxies, and votes representing 2,209,500 shares were cast in favor of the auditing firm selected. |
|
Item 5. Other Information |
None |
|
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
|
a. Exhibits |
|
11. Computation of Earnings Per Share Filed Herewith, See Note 3 to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
31.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
31.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
26
b. Reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended June 30, 2008
Date of Report | | Date Filed | | Description | |
| | | | | | | | | |
May 1, 2008 | | May 1, 2008 | | Press release, dated May 1, 2008, issued by The National Security Group, Inc. |
May 16, 2008 | | May 16, 2008 | | Press release, dated May 16, 2008, issued by The National Security Group, Inc. |
| | | | | | | | | |
27
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed by the undersigned duly authorized officer, on its behalf and in the capacity indicated.
The National Security Group, Inc.
/s/ William L. Brunson, Jr. | | /s/ Brian R. McLeod |
William L. Brunson, Jr. | | Brian R. McLeod |
President and Chief Executive Officer | | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
Dated: August 14, 2008
28
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, William L. Brunson, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The National Security Group, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
Dated: August 14, 2008 |
|
/s/ William L. Brunson, Jr. |
William L. Brunson, Jr. |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
29
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Brian R. McLeod, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The National Security Group, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
Dated: August 14, 2008 |
|
|
Brian R. McLeod |
Chief Financial Officer |
30
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of the National Security Group, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | | | |
| | /s/ William L. Brunson, Jr. |
Date: August 14, 2008 | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | Name: William L. Brunson, Jr. Title: Chief Executive Officer |
31
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of The National Security Group, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | | | |
| | /s/ Brian R. McLeod |
Date: August 14. 2008 | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | Name: Brian R. McLeod, CPA Title: Chief Financial Officer |
32