UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | |
| | For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 |
| | |
| | OR |
| | |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | |
| | For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 1-14097
SAUER-DANFOSS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | | 36-3482074 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | | (IRS Employer |
incorporation or organization) | | Identification No.) |
| | |
250 Parkway Drive, Suite 270, Lincolnshire, Illinois | | 60069 |
(Address of principal executive office) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (515) 239-6000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer ý Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No ý
As of May 1, 2006, 47,732,779 shares of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. common stock, $.01 par value, were outstanding.
Sauer-Danfoss Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Net Sales | | $ | 483,959 | | $ | 422,585 | |
Costs and Expenses: | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | 367,987 | | 323,597 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 53,783 | | 57,133 | |
Research and development | | 14,534 | | 15,406 | |
Impairment charges and loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets | | 1,881 | | (65 | ) |
Total costs and expenses | | 438,185 | | 396,071 | |
Operating income | | 45,774 | | 26,514 | |
| | | | | |
Nonoperating Income (Expenses): | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | | (4,584 | ) | (4,319 | ) |
Other, net | | (1,161 | ) | 1,611 | |
Nonoperating expenses, net | | (5,745 | ) | (2,708 | ) |
Income Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest | | 40,029 | | 23,806 | |
Minority Interest | | (8,118 | ) | (7,383 | ) |
Income Before Income Taxes | | 31,911 | | 16,423 | |
Income Tax Expense | | (6,337 | ) | (5,613 | ) |
Net Income | | $ | 25,574 | | $ | 10,810 | |
Net Income per common share, basic | | $ | 0.54 | | $ | 0.23 | |
Net Income per common share, diluted | | $ | 0.54 | | $ | 0.23 | |
Weighted average basic shares outstanding | | 47,692,279 | | 47,450,732 | |
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding | | 47,796,162 | | 47,659,284 | |
| | | | | |
Dividends declared per common share | | $ | 0.14 | | $ | 0.12 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Sauer-Danfoss Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
| | March 31, | | December 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | |
Assets | | | | | |
Current Assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 17,219 | | $ | 14,194 | |
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $4,585 and $4,900 | | 300,800 | | 220,752 | |
at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively | | | | | |
Inventories | | 231,767 | | 245,383 | |
Other current assets | | 33,690 | | 31,891 | |
Total current assets | | 583,476 | | 512,220 | |
| | | | | |
Property, Plant and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $746,629 | | | | | |
and $722,481 at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively | | 448,274 | | 450,426 | |
| | | | | |
Other Assets: | | | | | |
Goodwill | | 121,110 | | 120,318 | |
Other intangible assets, net | | 28,776 | | 29,587 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 46,227 | | 42,871 | |
Other | | 14,191 | | 15,491 | |
Total other assets | | 210,304 | | 208,267 | |
| | $ | 1,242,054 | | $ | 1,170,913 | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | |
Current Liabilities: | | | | | |
Notes payable and bank overdrafts | | $ | 48,606 | | $ | 31,934 | |
Long-term debt due within one year | | 159,874 | | 168,548 | |
Accounts payable | | 119,750 | | 107,090 | |
Accrued salaries and wages | | 49,995 | | 44,035 | |
Accrued warranty | | 17,189 | | 17,047 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | 53,974 | | 42,653 | |
Total current liabilities | | 449,388 | | 411,307 | |
| | | | | |
Long-Term Debt | | 136,512 | | 135,452 | |
| | | | | |
Other Liabilities | | | | | |
Long-term pension liability | | 50,774 | | 49,590 | |
Postretirement benefits other than pensions | | 19,672 | | 19,461 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 47,085 | | 44,277 | |
Other | | 20,796 | | 20,464 | |
Total other liabilities | | 138,327 | | 133,792 | |
| | | | | |
Minority Interest in Net Assets of Consolidated Companies | | 57,879 | | 51,440 | |
| | | | | |
Stockholders’ Equity: | | | | | |
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 4,500,000 shares, no shares issued or outstanding | | — | | — | |
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized shares 75,000,000 in 2005 and 2004; issued and outstanding 47,732,779 in 2006 and 47,498,232 in 2005 | | 477 | | 475 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | 331,948 | | 332,861 | |
Retained earnings | | 97,067 | | 78,176 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | 30,456 | | 27,410 | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | 459,948 | | 438,922 | |
| | $ | 1,242,054 | | $ | 1,170,913 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Sauer-Danfoss Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
| | Number of Shares Outstanding | | Common Stock | | Aditional Paid in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | | Total | |
Year Ended December 31, 2005 | | 47,498,232 | | $ | 475 | | $ | 332,861 | | $ | 78,176 | | $ | 27,410 | | $ | 438,922 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended March 31, 2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | — | | — | | — | | 25,574 | | — | | — | |
Unrealized gains on hedging activities | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 43 | | — | |
Currency translation | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 2,992 | | — | |
Total comprehensive income | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 28,609 | |
Performance units vested | | 234,547 | | 2 | | (2 | ) | — | | — | | — | |
Minimum tax withholding net settlement | | — | | — | | (3,144 | ) | — | | — | | (3,144 | ) |
Restricted stock and performance unit compensation | | — | | — | | 2,244 | | — | | — | | 2,244 | |
Cash dividends declared ($.14 per share) | | — | | — | | — | | (6,683 | ) | — | | (6,683 | ) |
Ending Balance | | 47,732,779 | | $ | 477 | | $ | 331,959 | | $ | 97,067 | | $ | 30,445 | | $ | 459,948 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Sauer-Danfoss Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 25,574 | | $ | 10,810 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 22,001 | | 22,360 | |
Minority interest | | 8,118 | | 7,383 | |
Restricted stock and performance unit compensation | | 2,244 | | 2,888 | |
Impairment charge and loss on disposal of fixed assets | | 1,881 | | — | |
(Increase) decrease in operating assets and liabilities - | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | (75,153 | ) | (62,107 | ) |
Inventories | | 20,363 | | 1,020 | |
Accounts payable | | 4,364 | | 978 | |
Accrued liabilities | | 13,620 | | 4,475 | |
Change in deferred income taxes | | (686 | ) | 853 | |
Other | | 3,082 | | 10,266 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | 25,408 | | (1,074 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | | | | | |
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | | (16,883 | ) | (18,443 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment | | 406 | | 342 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (16,477 | ) | (18,101 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | | | | | |
Net borrowings on notes payable and bank overdrafts | | 16,349 | | 32,664 | |
Net borrowings (repayments) on revolving credit facility | | (9,955 | ) | 1,273 | |
Repayments of long-term debt | | (1,062 | ) | (4,299 | ) |
Borrowings of long-term debt | | 935 | | — | |
Cash dividends | | (5,700 | ) | (4,744 | ) |
Distribution to minority interest partners | | (2,028 | ) | (1,948 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | (1,461 | ) | 22,946 | |
| | | | | |
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash | | (4,445 | ) | (2,602 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents: | | | | | |
Net increase during the period | | 3,025 | | 1,169 | |
Beginning balance | | 14,194 | | 11,273 | |
Ending balance | | $ | 17,219 | | $ | 12,442 | |
| | | | | |
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures: | | | | | |
Interest paid | | $ | 4,802 | | $ | 4,402 | |
Income taxes paid | | $ | 7,505 | | $ | 4,590 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Sauer-Danfoss Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies -
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation –
The consolidated financial statements of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and represent the consolidation of all companies in which the Company has a controlling financial ownership interest or a majority of the interest in earnings or losses. Certain information and disclosures normally included in comprehensive financial statements, prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S.), have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. It is suggested that these interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s latest annual report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2006.
Use of Estimates —
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
New Accounting Principle –
In November 2004 the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 151, “Inventory Costs.” SFAS No. 151 amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4 on inventory pricing to clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials should be recognized as current period charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overhead to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The Company adopted SFAS No. 151 in the first quarter of 2006 with no material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications –
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
7
2) Basic and Diluted Per Share Data -
Basic net income per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period less restricted stock shares issued in connection with the Company’s long-term incentive plan and subject to risk of forfeiture. Diluted net income per common share assumes that outstanding common shares were increased by shares issuable upon (i) vesting of restricted stock shares, and (ii) granting of shares under the long-term incentive plan, after it becomes certain that the performance requirements needed to be met in accordance with the incentive plan will be achieved. Shares under both the restricted stock plan and the long-term incentive plan have an exercise price of zero. The reconciliation of basic net income per common share to diluted net income per common share is shown in the following table for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005:
| | March 31, 2006 | | March 31, 2005 | |
| | Net Income | | Shares | | EPS | | Net Income | | Shares | | EPS | |
Basic net income | | $ | 25,574 | | 47,692,279 | | $ | 0.54 | | $ | 10,810 | | 47,450,732 | | $ | 0.23 | |
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted stock | | — | | 27,532 | | — | | — | | 24,645 | | — | |
Performance units | | — | | 76,351 | | — | | — | | 183,907 | | — | |
Diluted net income | | $ | 25,574 | | 47,796,162 | | $ | 0.54 | | $ | 10,810 | | 47,659,284 | | $ | 0.23 | |
3) Restructuring Charges -
In March 2006 the Company announced its intentions to close the LaSalle, Illinois, plant, discontinue production of older product lines manufactured in Swindon, England, and restructure certain activities in the Controls segment. Certain products currently manufactured in LaSalle will be outsourced to reduce costs and increase efficiencies. The total cost of the restructuring activities at LaSalle and Swindon are expected to be approximately $8,500 and $6,200, respectively. The costs related to the LaSalle plant closing are included in the Propel segment and the costs related to the Swindon product line discontinuance are included in the Work Function segment. The following table summarizes the restructuring charges incurred in 2006:
| | March 31, 2006 | |
| | Propel | | Work Function | | Controls | | Total | |
Employee termination costs | | $ | 1,283 | | $ | 251 | | $ | — | | $ | 1,534 | |
Property and equipment impairment and loss on disposal | | — | | 1,547 | | 108 | | 1,655 | |
Accelerated depreciation due to change in useful lives | | 326 | | — | | — | | 326 | |
Pension curtailment | | 1,551 | | — | | — | | 1,551 | |
Total | | $ | 3,160 | | $ | 1,798 | | $ | 108 | | $ | 5,066 | |
The amount for pension curtailment is the recognition of unamortized prior service costs related to the pension plan at LaSalle. At March 31, 2006 $1,534 of the employee termination costs were accrued on the balance sheet.
The cost for restructuring as of March 31, 2006 totaled $5,066 consisting of $3,338, $73, and $1,655 included in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses, and impairment charges and loss on disposal of fixed assets, respectively.
4) Inventories-
The composition of inventories is as follows:
| | March 31, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
Raw materials | | $ | 101,273 | | $ | 101,912 | |
Work in progress | | 53,624 | | 59,583 | |
Finished goods and parts | | 91,725 | | 98,530 | |
LIFO allowance | | (14,855 | ) | (14,642 | ) |
Total | | $ | 231,767 | | $ | 245,383 | |
8
5) Long-Term Incentive Plan -
Under the 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (1998 Incentive Plan), the Board of Directors is authorized to grant non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, performance units, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and performance shares to employees. Refer to Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 2005 annual report filed on Form 10-K for additional information. In February 2005 the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determined that all performance units outstanding at that time, in addition to the performance units granted in 2005, would be settled 100% in company stock with shares withheld having a value to meet the minimum statutory withholding requirements of the Company in the countries where the individual participants pay tax. Therefore these units are being accounted for as equity units with compensation expense recognized based on the fair value of the Company’s stock price at the grant or the modification date.
In December 2005, the Board of Directors approved the adoption of the Sauer-Danfoss Inc. 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan (2006 Incentive Plan), subject to stockholder approval at the annual meeting in June 2006. The 2006 Incentive Plan provides for grants similar to those under the 1998 Incentive Plan and qualifies certain awards for the performance-based exception to obtain favorable tax treatment. In February 2006 the Compensation Committee granted 346,013 performance units under the 2006 Incentive Plan, subject to the approval of the plan by the stockholders. The Compensation Committee indicated that the performance units granted in 2006 would be settled 100% in company stock with shares withheld having a value to meet the minimum statutory withholding requirements, with the exception of grants to certain individuals that would be settled in cash. The units to be settled in cash are accounted for as liability units, with the remainder of the units accounted for as equity units.
In accordance with SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of three years, measured based on the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant or modification, with an offsetting increase in additional paid-in capital. The expense related to the performance units granted under the 2006 Incentive Plan was valued based on the market price of the Company’s stock as of the end of March 31, 2006. The market price of the Company’s stock at the time the 2006 Incentive Plan is approved by the Company’s stockholders will be used to recognize compensation expense in future periods. The Company recognized $2,197 of expense in the three months ended March 31, 2006 related to outstanding performance units granted under the 1998 Incentive Plan and the 2006 Incentive Plan. The Company recognized a tax benefit of approximately $770 on this expense. The Company expects to recognize approximately $13,700 of additional expense through 2008 related to the outstanding performance units under these two plans.
The following chart summarizes performance unit activity under the plan for the three months ended March 31, 2006:
| | Number | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Weighted Average Vesting Period in Years | |
Units Outstanding at January 1 | | 948,029 | | $ | 18.42 | | 2.8 | |
Units settled | | (257,164 | ) | 16.98 | | 2.0 | |
Units granted | | 346,013 | | 22.95 | (1) | 3.0 | |
Units Outstanding at March 31 | | 1,036,878 | | | 20.29 | | 3.0 | |
(1) The grant date fair value is the March 31, 2006 market value. This will be updated upon approval of the 2006 Incentive Plan by the stockholders.
9
6) Pension and Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions –
Pension Benefits
The Company has noncontributory defined benefit plans covering a significant number of its employees. The benefits under these plans are based primarily on years of service and compensation levels. Pension expense for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 for the defined benefit plans consists of the following components:
| | Three months ended March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Service cost | | $ | 1,059 | | $ | 1,294 | |
Interest cost | | 2,361 | | 2,904 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | (1,828 | ) | (2,238 | ) |
Amortization of prior service cost (1) | | 1,661 | | 159 | |
Amortization of net loss | | 544 | | 482 | |
Net periodic pension expense | | $ | 3,797 | | $ | 2,601 | |
(1) The 2006 amount includes $1,551 for the write-off of unamortized prior service costs related to the LaSalle pension plan. The write-off is part of the restructuring activities discussed in Note 3.
Postretirement Benefits
The Company provides health benefits for certain retired employees and certain dependents when the employee becomes eligible for these benefits by satisfying plan provisions that include certain age and service requirements. The components of the postretirement benefit expense of the Company-sponsored plans for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
| | Three months ended March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Service cost | | $ | 141 | | $ | 155 | |
Interest cost | | 470 | | 438 | |
Net deferral and amortization | | 173 | | 135 | |
Postretirement benefit expense | | $ | 784 | | $ | 728 | |
The FASB issued Staff Position 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003” (the Act) in May 2004. The Act introduced a prescription drug benefit under Medicare Part D, as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. The effects of the Act were incorporated in the measurement of the plan assets and obligation that was completed as of December 31, 2005 resulting in a decrease of $1,465 in the amount of unrecognized actuarial loss related to the Company’s retiree health and accident plan. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 the effect of the subsidy was to reduce the amortization of the net unrecognized actuarial loss, the current period service cost, and interest cost on the accumulated plan benefit obligation by $25, $4, and $24 respectively.
7) Income Taxes -
The Company reversed $4,172 of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets in the first quarter of 2006. Based on projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies, the Company expects that the deferred tax assets related to foreign and research tax credits in the U.S. will be utilized in the future.
8) Segment and Geographic Information -
The Company’s operating segments are organized around its various product lines of Propel, Work Function and Controls. Propel products include hydrostatic transmissions and related products that transmit the power from the engine to the wheel to propel a vehicle. Work Function products include steering motors as well as gear pumps and motors that transmit power for the work functions of the vehicle. Controls products include electrohydraulic controls, microprocessors, electric drives
10
and valves that control and direct the power of a vehicle. Segment costs in Global Services relate to internal global service departments and include costs such as consulting for special projects, tax and accounting fees paid to outside third parties, certain insurance premiums, and amortization of intangible assets from certain business combinations.
The following table presents the significant items by operating segment for the results of operations for the three month periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 and balance sheet data as of these dates:
| | Propel | | Work Function | | Controls | | Global Services | | Total | |
March 31, 2006 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trade sales | | $ | 251,944 | | $ | 124,939 | | $ | 107,076 | | $ | — | | $ | 483,959 | |
Segment income (loss) | | 40,250 | | 5,684 | | 14,322 | | (15,643 | ) | 44,613 | |
Interest expense, net | | | | | | | | | | (4,584 | ) |
Minority interest | | | | | | | | | | (8,118 | ) |
Income before income taxes | | | | | | | | | | 31,911 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 10,433 | | 6,209 | | 4,184 | | 1,175 | | 22,001 | |
Total assets | | 428,125 | | 338,079 | | 273,938 | | 201,912 | | 1,242,054 | |
Capital expenditures | | 6,386 | | 6,943 | | 3,347 | | 207 | | 16,883 | |
March 31, 2005 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trade sales | | $ | 209,862 | | $ | 115,732 | | $ | 96,991 | | $ | — | | $ | 422,585 | |
Segment income (loss) | | 31,595 | | 4,456 | | 7,771 | | (15,697 | ) | 28,125 | |
Interest expense, net | | | | | | | | | | (4,319 | ) |
Minority interest | | | | | | | | | | (7,383 | ) |
Income before income taxes | | | | | | | | | | 16,423 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 9,765 | | 6,667 | | 3,926 | | 2,002 | | 22,360 | |
Total assets | | 428,665 | | 330,372 | | 275,381 | | 188,274 | | 1,222,692 | |
Capital expenditures | | 7,739 | | 4,621 | | 5,759 | | 324 | | 18,443 | |
A summary of the Company’s net sales and long-lived assets by geographic area is presented below:
| | Net Sales (1) | | Long-Lived Assets (2) | |
| | Three months ended March 31, | | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
United States | | $ | 227,992 | | $ | 191,066 | | $ | 171,906 | | $ | 169,288 | |
Germany | | 44,781 | | 40,999 | | 56,578 | | 61,096 | |
Italy | | 30,660 | | 28,384 | | 28,452 | | 31,484 | |
France | | 25,443 | | 22,713 | | 908 | | 1,030 | |
Japan | | 18,284 | | 19,676 | | 4,745 | | 4,311 | |
United Kingdon | | 14,655 | | 15,874 | | 20,940 | | 21,583 | |
Sweden | | 18,307 | | 16,789 | | 5,954 | | 6,362 | |
Denmark (3) | | 4,979 | | 5,753 | | 189,932 | | 196,914 | |
Slovakia (3) | | 444 | | 293 | | 54,385 | | 54,645 | |
Other countries | | 98,414 | | 81,038 | | 78,551 | | 79,759 | |
Total | | $ | 483,959 | | $ | 422,585 | | $ | 612,351 | | $ | 626,472 | |
(1) Net sales are attributed to countries based on location of customer.
(2) Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment net of accumulated depreciation, goodwill, intangible assets net of accumulated amortization, and certain other long-lived assets.
(3) Majority of this country’s sales are shipped outside of the home country where the product is produced.
No single customer accounted for 10% or more of total consolidated sales in any period presented.
11
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Sauer-Danfoss Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company)
Safe Harbor Statement - This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as well as other portions of this quarterly report, contains certain statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. All statements regarding future performance, growth, sales and earnings projections, conditions or developments are forward-looking statements. Words such as “anticipates,” “in the opinion,” “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “plans,” “forecasts,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “projects,” “potential,” “continue,” and similar expressions may be intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Actual future results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including the fact that the U.S. economy generally, and the construction, road building and material handling and specialty vehicle markets specifically, has, in recent months, been stronger than in recent years. It is difficult to determine if past experience is a good guide to the future. While the economy in the U.S. has generally been improving, it remains unstable due to the uncertainty surrounding continued job creation, interest rates, crude oil prices, and the U.S. government’s stance on the weaker dollar. The economic situation in Europe has begun to improve in recent months. Any downturn in the Company’s business segments could adversely affect the Company’s revenues and results of operations. Other factors affecting forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: specific economic conditions in the agriculture, construction, road building, turf care, material handling and specialty vehicle markets and the impact of such conditions on the Company’s customers in such markets; the cyclical nature of some of the Company’s businesses; the ability of the Company to win new programs and maintain existing programs with its original equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers; the highly competitive nature of the markets for the Company’s products as well as pricing pressures that may result from such competitive conditions; the continued operation and viability of the Company’s significant customers; the Company’s execution of internal performance plans; difficulties or delays in manufacturing; cost-reduction and productivity efforts; competing technologies and difficulties entering new markets, both domestic and foreign; changes in the Company’s product mix; future levels of indebtedness and capital spending; claims, including, without limitation, warranty claims, field retrofit claims, product liability claims, charges or dispute resolutions; ability of suppliers to provide materials as needed and the Company’s ability to recover any price increases for materials in product pricing; the Company’s ability to attract and retain key technical and other personnel; labor relations; the failure of customers to make timely payment; any inadequacy of the Company’s intellectual property protection or the potential for third-party claims of infringement; global economic factors, including currency exchange rates; general economic conditions, including interest rates, the rate of inflation, and commercial and consumer confidence; energy prices; governmental laws and regulations affecting operations, including tax obligations; changes in accounting standards; worldwide political stability; the effects of terrorist activities and resulting political or economic instability; natural catastrophes; U.S. military action overseas; and the effect of acquisitions, divestitures, restructurings, product withdrawals, and other unusual events.
The Company cautions the reader that these lists of cautionary statements and risk factors may not be exhaustive. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or changes to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect any future events or circumstances.
About the Company
Sauer-Danfoss Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) is a worldwide leader in the design, manufacture, and sale of engineered hydraulic and electronic systems and components that generate, transmit and control power in mobile equipment. The Company’s products are used by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) of mobile equipment, including construction, road building, agricultural, turf care, material handling, and specialty equipment. The Company designs, manufactures and markets its products in the Americas, Europe and the Asia-Pacific regions, and markets its products throughout the rest of the world either directly or through distributors.
12
Executive Summary – Three months ended March 31, 2006
The nature of the Company’s operations as a global producer and supplier in the fluid power industry means the Company is impacted by changes in the local economies, including currency exchange rate fluctuations. In order to gain a better understanding of the Company’s base results, a financial statement user needs to understand the impact of those currency exchange rate fluctuations. The following table summarizes the Company’s first quarter 2006 and 2005 results from operations, separately identifying the impact of currency fluctuations. This analysis is more consistent with how the Company internally evaluates its results.
(in millions) | | Three months ended March 31,2005 | | Currency Fluctuations | | Underlying increase (decrease) | | Three months ended March 31, 2006 | |
Net sales | | $ | 422.6 | | $ | (20.4 | ) | $ | 81.8 | | $ | 484.0 | |
Gross profit | | 99.0 | | (6.3 | ) | 23.3 | | 116.0 | |
% of Sales | | 23.4 | % | | | | | 23.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 57.1 | | (2.4 | ) | 1.0 | | 55.7 | |
Research & development | | 15.4 | | (0.7 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 14.5 | |
Total operating costs | | 72.5 | | (3.1 | ) | 0.8 | | 70.2 | |
Operating income | | $ | 26.5 | | $ | (3.2 | ) | $ | 22.5 | | $ | 45.8 | |
% of Sales | | 6.3 | % | | | | | 9.5 | % |
Net sales for the first quarter 2006 increased 19 percent over first quarter 2005, excluding the effects of currency, with all regions and segments contributing to the increase in sales. The increase in sales in the first quarter was due to overall strong economic conditions, price increases and higher sales volumes. Sales were particularly strong in the U.S. The Propel segment experienced the strongest growth in sales. The Company continued to experience some additional costs related to the use of subcontracting suppliers to reduce the effect of production bottlenecks due to the high demand in the first quarter of 2006. In addition, the Company experienced an increase in employee labor costs and an increase in material costs. The increased sales, partially offset by higher costs, caused margins to increase by 0.5% in the first quarter of 2006 compared to the first quarter of 2005.
Contributing to the increase in operating income, excluding the effects of currency, was a $1.0 million increase in selling, general, and administrative costs. Outside service costs during the first quarter of 2006 related to the assessment of internal controls under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 decreased $2.1 million. General and administrative costs in the business segments were also lower. These decreases were partially offset by increased costs related to the Company’s incentive plans and by $1.7 million in asset impairment charges related to restructuring activities.
The Company incurred a total of $5.1 million in restructuring charges during the first quarter of 2006. The Company announced plans to close the LaSalle, Illinois plant, to discontinue the production of older product lines currently manufactured in the Swindon, England plant, and to restructure certain activities in the controls segment. Costs incurred in connection with these restructurings include employee termination costs of $1.5 million, impairment of fixed assets of $1.7 million, pension curtailment charges of $1.6 million, and accelerated depreciation of $0.3 million.
Following is a discussion of the Company’s operating results by market, region, and business segment.
Operating Results -Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
Sales Growth by Market
The following table summarizes the Company’s sales growth by market. The table and following discussion is on a comparable basis, which excludes the effects of currency fluctuations.
| | Americas | | Asia-Pacific | | Europe | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Agriculture/Turf Care | | 16 | % | (33 | )% | 11 | % | 13 | % |
Construction/Road Building | | 25 | | 40 | | 25 | | 27 | |
Specialty | | 27 | | 3 | | 20 | | 21 | |
Distribution | | 24 | | 30 | | 12 | | 20 | |
13
Agriculture/Turf Care
The turf care market in the Americas was up in the first quarter of 2006 while the agricultural market was down slightly as farmers are reducing their purchasing due to high energy costs. Increases in the turf care market is attributable to the continued strength of the U.S. economy. Sales in the European market increased compared to the first quarter of 2005 due to strengthening economic conditions. The Asia-Pacific market contributes less than 5 percent of the sales in the agriculture / turf care markets.
Construction/Road Building
Sales increased in the construction and road building markets in all regions in the first quarter of 2006. The 25 percent increase in sales in the Americas region is primarily driven by the continued growth in the production of skid steer loaders as well as increases in the production of crawlers. The Asia-Pacific market also benefited from the growth in the skid steer loader market, in addition to increased demand from the Chinese truck mixer market. The Road Building market in the Asia-Pacific region showed strong increases due to increased government spending in China. Growth in the European markets is the result of strong market conditions.
Specialty
Specialty vehicles are comprised of a variety of markets including forestry, material handling, marine, waste management and waste recycling. All regions contributed to the sales growth in the specialty markets in the first quarter. Growth in the aerial lift market is the main contributor to the overall 21 percent increase in sales for the first quarter.
Distribution
Products related to all of the above markets are also sold to distributors, who then serve smaller OEMs.
Order Backlog
The following table shows the Company’s order backlog at March 31, 2006 and 2005 and orders written in the three-month periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, including the effect of currency fluctuations. Order backlog represents the amount of customer orders that have been received for future shipment.
(in millions) | | March 31, 2005 | | Currency fluctuations | | Underlying increase (decrease) | | March 31, 2006 | |
Americas | | | | | | | | | |
Backlog | | $ | 252.6 | | $ | 0.8 | | $ | 61.6 | | $ | 315.0 | |
Orders Written | | 218.2 | | 1.1 | | 25.5 | | 244.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Asia-Pacific | | | | | | | | | |
Backlog | | 26.2 | | (0.6 | ) | 1.1 | | 26.7 | |
Orders Written | | 38.1 | | (2.3 | ) | (1.1 | ) | 34.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Europe | | | | | | | | | |
Backlog | | 199.7 | | (8.4 | ) | (0.4 | ) | 190.9 | |
Orders Written | | 208.2 | | (20.2 | ) | 42.0 | | 230.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | | | | | | |
Backlog | | 478.5 | | (8.2 | ) | 62.3 | | 532.6 | |
Orders Written | | 464.5 | | (21.4 | ) | 66.4 | | 509.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total order backlog at March 31, 2006 was $532.6 million, compared to $478.5 million at March 31, 2005, an increase of 11 percent. Excluding the effect of currency fluctuations, order backlog increased 13 percent during this same period. The increase in backlog at March 31, 2006 reflects the general overall economic strength across the various markets that the Company serves.
New sales orders written in the first three months of 2006 were $509.5 million, an increase of 10 percent over the $464.5 million of orders written in the first three months of 2005. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, total orders written in the first three months of 2006 increased 14 percent compared to orders written in the first three months of 2005, resulting in strong sales for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as previously noted in the executive summary.
14
Business Segment Results
The following discussion of operating results by segment relates to information as presented in Note 8 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Segment income is defined as the respective segment’s portion of the total Company’s net income, excluding net interest expense, income taxes, minority interest, and global services expenses. Propel products include hydrostatic transmissions and related products that transmit the power from the engine to the wheel to propel a vehicle. Work Function products include steering motors as well as gear pumps and motors that transmit power for the work functions of the vehicle. Controls products include electrohydraulic controls, microprocessors, electric drives and valves that control and direct the power of a vehicle. The following table provides a summary of each segment’s sales and segment income, separately identifying the impact of currency fluctuations.
(in millions) | | Three months ended March 31, 2005 | | Currency fluctuations | | Underlying increase (decrease) | | Three months ended March 31, 2006 | |
Net sales | | | | | | | | | |
Propel | | $ | 209.9 | | $ | (7.2 | ) | $ | 49.3 | | $ | 252.0 | |
Work Function | | 115.7 | | (7.5 | ) | 16.7 | | 124.9 | |
Controls | | 97.0 | | (5.7 | ) | 15.8 | | 107.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Segment income (loss) | | | | | | | | | |
Propel | | $ | 31.6 | | $ | (1.6 | ) | $ | 10.3 | | $ | 40.3 | |
Work Function | | 4.5 | | (0.8 | ) | 2.0 | | 5.7 | |
Controls | | 7.8 | | (1.2 | ) | 7.7 | | 14.3 | |
Global Services and other expenses, net | | (15.7 | ) | 0.1 | | — | | (15.6 | ) |
Propel Segment
The Propel segment experienced strong growth, with a 23 percent increase in sales, excluding the effects of currency fluctuations, in first quarter 2006 compared to 2005. Sales have increased due to both increased sales volumes and introduction of new products. All markets experienced growth during the quarter, due largely to strong economic conditions in the U.S. and European markets. Segment income was negatively impacted by $3.2 million of restructuring charges. The Company announced plans to close the manufacturing facility in LaSalle, Illinois during 2006, and costs incurred in the first quarter of 2006 consist of employee severance costs of $1.3 million, pension curtailment costs of $1.6 million and accelerated depreciation of fixed assets of $0.3 million.
Work Function Segment
Sales in the Work Function segment increased 14 percent, excluding the effects of currency fluctuations, in the first quarter of 2006. This increase in sales contributed to income of $5.7 million in 2006. The Company continues to incur costs in order to meet the increase in demand for Work Function products, primarily from the U.S. The increased demand has resulted in increased overtime costs and more use of subcontract suppliers, in addition to increased airfreight delivery costs to expedite shipments, although at a lower level than in the fourth quarter of 2005. The gross profit percentage has remained flat excluding the impacts of currency fluctuations when compared to the first quarter of 2005. Segment income was negatively impacted by $1.8 million of restructuring costs. The Company announced plans to discontinue production of older product lines manufactured in the Swindon, England plant. The Work Function segment incurred $0.3 million in employee severance costs and $1.5 million in impairment of fixed assets related to the restructuring activities.
Controls Segment
Net sales in the Controls segment for first quarter 2006, excluding the effects of currency fluctuations, increased 16 percent compared to first quarter 2005. Gross profit as a percent of sales in first quarter 2006 remained flat compared to the same period in 2005. Operating costs decreased $0.5 million due primarily to a reduction in research and development costs. Research and development costs in the first quarter of 2005 were high as there were several new products in development stage. Also during the first quarter of 2005, the Controls segment incurred start-up costs related to a new production facility in India.
Global Services and other expenses, net
Segment costs in Global Services and other expenses, net, relate to internal global service departments, along with the operating costs of the Company’s executive office. Global services include such costs as consulting for special projects, tax and accounting fees paid to outside third parties, internal audit, certain insurance premiums, and the amortization of intangible assets from certain business
15
combinations. The Global Services costs in the first quarter of 2006 were level with the costs in the first quarter of 2005, excluding the effects of currency fluctuations. Transaction gains and losses on foreign currency transactions negatively affected other expenses by $2.6 million in the first quarter 2006 compared to the first quarter of 2005. This was partially offset by a $2.1 million decrease in Sarbanes-Oxley compliance costs during the same periods.
Income Taxes
The Company’s effective tax rate was 19.9 percent for the first quarter of 2006 compared to 34.2 percent for the same period in 2005. The effective tax rate declined significantly in the first quarter of 2006 because tax expense associated with income in the U.S. was offset by the reversal of valuation allowances of $4.2 million on deferred tax assets related to foreign and research credits that are now expected to be utilized. In addition, the Company’s effective tax rate can vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to the mix of earnings between the U.S. and Europe.
Market Risk
The Company is exposed to various market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, and material purchase prices.
Foreign currency changes
The Company has operations and sells its products in many different countries of the world and therefore, conducts its business in various currencies. The Company’s financial statements, which are presented in U.S. dollars, can be impacted by foreign exchange fluctuations through both translation exposure and transaction risk. Translation exposure is when the financial statements of the Company, for a particular period or as of a certain date, may be affected by changes in the exchange rates that are used to translate the financial statements of the Company’s operations from foreign currencies into U.S. dollars. Transaction risk is the potential expense or income due to the Company receiving its sale proceeds or holding its assets in a currency different from that in which it pays its expenses and holds its liabilities. The Company had $1.1 million of expense related to transaction losses in the first three months of 2006 compared to $1.5 million of income for the first three months of 2005.
Fluctuations of currencies against the U.S. dollar can be substantial and therefore significantly impact comparisons with prior periods. The U.S. dollar remained fairly level compared to other currencies between December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006; however, the U.S. dollar was stronger in the first quarter of 2006 than in the first quarter of 2005.
In 2005 the Company began to enter into forward contracts to minimize the impact of currency fluctuations on cash flows related to forecasted sales denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the selling location. The forecasted sales represent sales to both external and internal parties. Any effects of the forward contracts related to sales to internal parties are eliminated in the consolidation process until the related inventory has been sold to an external party. The forward contracts qualify for hedge accounting and therefore are subject to effectiveness testing at the inception of the contract and throughout the life of the contract. The fair value of forward contracts outstanding at March 31, 2006 was not significant.
Interest Rates
The Company uses interest rate swap agreements on a limited basis to manage the interest rate risk on its total debt portfolio. The Company has not entered into any new interest rate swap agreements in 2006. Additional information regarding interest rate swaps is set forth in the Company’s most recent annual report filed on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference. There has been no material change in this information.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s principal sources of liquidity have continued to be from internally generated funds from operations and from borrowings under various credit facilities. The Company has multiple funding sources that have been and continue to be available; therefore, the Company expects to have sufficient sources of liquidity to meet its funding needs for the foreseeable future.
The Company has a multicurrency revolving credit facility that permits unsecured borrowings up to $250.0 million through December 2010. At March 31, 2006 there was $88.6 million outstanding under the facility, compared to $98.3 million outstanding at December 31, 2005. The Company is in compliance with the financial covenants related to its debt facilities.
Cash Flow from Operations
Cash flow from operations for the first quarter of 2006 was $25.4 million compared to the 2005 cash used in operations of $1.1 million.
16
The Company generated positive cash flow from operations despite the fact that working capital needs increased from the previous period end due to the increased level of sales in the first three months of the year. Inventory decreased at several of the larger manufacturing locations due to the use of inventory to fulfill increasing customer orders. Changes in inventory, accounts payable and accrued liabilities were offset by increases in accounts receivable due to increases in sales.
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Capital expenditures in the first three months of 2006 were $16.9 million compared to $18.4 million in the first three months of 2005.
Cash Used in Financing Activities
The Company continues to pay a dividend to its stockholders on a quarterly basis. In the first quarter of 2006, the Board of Directors approved an additional increase to the quarterly dividend, raising the quarterly dividend to $0.14 per share from $0.12 per share in 2005. The increased dividend will be paid in the second quarter of 2006. Dividend payments during the first quarter were $5.7 million in 2006 compared to $4.7 million in 2005. Repayment of borrowings under credit facilities used $11.0 million of cash in the first quarter of 2006. In addition, the Company makes varying distributions to its minority interest partners from its various joint venture activities depending on the amount of undistributed earnings of the businesses and the needs of the partners.
Other Matters
Critical Accounting Estimates
In preparing its most recent annual report on Form 10-K, the Company disclosed information about critical accounting estimates the Company makes in applying its accounting policies. The Company has made no changes to the methods of application or the assumptions used in applying these policies from what was disclosed in its most recent annual report on Form 10-K.
New Accounting Principles
In November 2004 the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 151, “Inventory Costs.” SFAS No. 151 amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, on inventory pricing to clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials should be recognized as current period charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overhead to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The Company adopted SFAS No. 151 in the first quarter of 2006 with no material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, KPMG LLP, performs the following non-audit services that have been approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors: international and U.S. tax planning and compliance services; expatriate tax services; statutory audits and related matters; and local tax and accounting technical support.
Outlook
Sales levels were at record levels for the first quarter of 2006 and are expected to continue to be strong through the second quarter of 2006. Although earnings in 2006 will continue to be negatively impacted by implementation costs related to the new common business system and targeted restructuring activities, the financial results for the full year are expected to surpass the 2005 financial results. Management of the Company expects the implementation of the common business system and the restructuring activities currently underway to have a positive impact on Company’s financial results starting in 2007 and beyond.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Information disclosing market risk is set forth in the Company’s most recent annual report filed on Form 10-K (Item 7A), and is incorporated herein by reference. There has been no material change in this information.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
At the end of the period covered by this report, the Registrant carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Registrant’s management, including the Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to
17
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Registrant files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported as required and within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
There were no changes to internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially impact, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
No matters were submitted to the security holders for vote during the quarter ended March 31, 2006.
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibit No. | | Description of Document |
3.1 | | The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated May 3, 2000, is attached as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 16, 2000, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
3.2 | | The Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company dated May 5, 2004, is attached as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 6, 2004, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
4 | | The form of Certificate of the Company’s Common Stock, $.01 Par Value, is attached as Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 16, 2000 and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(a) | | The Termination Agreement and Release dated May 3, 2000 relating to the termination of a Silent Partnership Agreement is attached as Exhibit 10.1(a) to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 16, 2000, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(b) | | The Registration Rights Agreement is attached as Exhibit 10.1(b) to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on April 23, 1998, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(c) | | The form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between the Company and each of its directors and certain officers is attached as Exhibit 10.1(c) to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on April 23, 1998, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(d) | | The Lease Agreement for the Company’s Osaka, Japan facility is attached as Exhibit 10.1(d) to the Company’s Form10-K filed on March 14, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(e) | | The Lease Agreement for the Company’s Swindon, England facility is attached as Exhibit 10.1(e) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 10, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(f) | | The Lease Agreement for the Company’s Minneapolis, Minnesota, facility is attached as Exhibit 10.1(h) to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on April 23, 1998, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(g) | | The Lease Agreement for the Company’s Berching, Germany, facility dated November 15, 1996, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(g) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(h) | | The Lease Agreement for the Company’s Shanghai/Pudong, China, facility is attached as Exhibit 10.1(j) to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on April 23, 1998, and is incorporated herein by reference |
10.1(i) | | The Lease Agreement for the Company’s Odense, Denmark, facility dated November 15, 1996, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(h) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(j) | | The Indenture of Lease agreement for the Company’s Nordborg, Denmark, facility effective May 3, 2000, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(ah) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2001, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(k) | | The Lease Agreement for the Company’s Hillsboro, Oregon, facility effective January 19, 2001, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(ai) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2001, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(l) | | The Lease Agreement for the Company’s leased facility in Ames, Iowa, effective April 1, 2002, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(am) to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2002, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(m) | | The Office Lease for the Company’s Chicago, Illinois, Executive Office effective June 1, 2002, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(an) to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2002, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(n) | | The Executive Employment Agreement with David J. Anderson dated January 1, 2003, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(m) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(o) | | The Executive Employment Agreement with Karl J. Schmidt dated January 1, 2003, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(n) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(p) | | The Executive Employment Agreement with James R. Wilcox dated January 1, 2003, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(o) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(q) | | The Executive Employment Agreement with Hans J. Cornett dated January 1, 2003, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(p) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
18
10.1(r) | | The Executive Employment Agreement with Thomas Kittel dated December 1, 2002, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(q) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(s) | | The Addendum to Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 2002, relating to the Executive Employment Agreement referred to in 10.1(r) above with Thomas Kittel is attached as Exhibit 10.1(r) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(t) | | The Executive Employment Agreement with Finn Lyhne dated December 1, 2002, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(s) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(u) | | The Addendum to Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 2002, relating to the Executive Employment Agreement referred to in 10.1(t) above with Finn Lyhne is attached as Exhibit 10.1(t) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(v) | | The Executive Employment Agreement with Henrik Krabsen dated January 1, 2003, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(v) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(w) | | The Executive Employment Agreement with Kenneth D. McCuskey dated January 1, 2003, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(w) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(x) | | The Executive Employment Agreement with Albert Zahalka dated January 1, 2003, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(x) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(y) | | The Executive Employment Agreement with Ronald C. Hanson dated July 1, 2003, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(z) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2004, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(z) | | The Consulting Agreement with Klaus Murmann dated May 5, 2004, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(z) to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 6, 2004, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(aa) | | The Amended and Restated Post-Retirement Care Agreement for Klaus Murmann, effective May 3, 2000, is attached as Exhibit 10.1 (s) to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 16, 2000, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(ab) | | The Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Annual Management Performance Incentive Plan restated as of January 1, 2002, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(ao) to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2002, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(ac) | | The Sauer-Sundstrand Company Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan for Certain Key Executives is attached as Exhibit 10.1(t) to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on April 23, 1998, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(ad) | | The First Amendment to the Sauer-Sundstrand Company Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan for Certain Key Executives referred to in Exhibit 10.1(ac) above, which renames the Plan to the Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan for Certain Key Executives, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(ad) to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 6. 2004, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(ae) | | The Sauer-Sundstrand Company Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan for Certain Key Executives Previously Employed by the Sundstrand Corporation is attached as Exhibit 10.1(u) to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on April 23, 1998, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(af) | | The European Employees’ Pension Plan is attached as Exhibit 10.1(y) to Amendment No.1 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on April 23, 1998, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(ag) | | The Sauer-Danfoss Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan is attached as Exhibit 10.1(p) to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on April 23, 1998, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(ah) | | The Amendment, effective May 3, 2000, to the Sauer-Danfoss Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan referred to in 10.1(as) above is attached as Exhibit 10.1 (v) to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 16, 2000, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(ai) | | The Amendment to the Sauer-Danfoss Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan effective December 4, 2002, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(bd) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(aj) | | The Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Non-employee Director Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan is attached as Exhibit 10.1(q) to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement filed on April 23, 1998, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(ak) | | The Amendment, effective May 3, 2000, to the Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan referred to in 10.1(aj) above is attached as Exhibit 10.1 (x) to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 16, 2000, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(al) | | The Amendment to the Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan effective December 4, 2002, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(ak) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(am) | | The Trademark and Trade Name Agreement dated May 3, 2000, between the Company and Danfoss A/S is attached as Exhibit 10.1 (ac) to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 16, 2000, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(an) | | The Stock Exchange Agreement dated January 22, 2000, by and among the Registrant, Danfoss A/S, Danfoss Murmann Holding A/S. and K. Murmann Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH is attached as Annex A to the Company’s Proxy Statement filed on March 28, 2000, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
19
10.1(ao) | | The Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Annual Officer Performance Incentive Plan amended and restated as of March 4, 2003, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(bc) to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(ap) | | First Amendment to the Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Annual Officer Incentive Plan Effective December 13, 2005, is attached as exhibit 9.4 to the Company’s Form 8-k filed December 78, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(aq) | | The Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Selected Employees dated December 9, 2003, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(bk) to the Company’s Fork 10-K filed on March 15, 2004, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(ar) | | First Amendment to the Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Annual Officer Incentive Plan Effective December 31, 2005, is attached as exhibit 9.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 7, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(as) | | The Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Supplemental Executive Savings & Retirement Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2005), is attached as exhibit 9.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 7, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(at) | | Summary of increased non-employee director compensation, effective April 27, 2005, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(bv) to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(au) | | Summary of increase in base salary for the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer adopted by the Compensation Committee on February 22, 2005, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(bw) to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(av) | | Form of 2005 Performance Unit Award Agreement under the Sauer-Danfoss Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) representing awards of Performance Units under the LTIP granted by the Compensation Committee on February 22, 2005 to participants under the LTIP, including all executive officers, as previously reported on the Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 28, 2005. The Form of the Award Agreement is attached as Exhibit 10.1(bx) to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
10.1(aw) | | Form of Non-employee Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement, is attached as Exhibit 10.1(by) to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference, representing the grant of 1,500 shares of Restricted Stock awarded by the Board of Directors to each non-employee director on April 27, 2005 pursuant to the Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Non-employee Director Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, as previously reported in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2005. |
10.1(ax) | | The Sauer-Danfoss Inc. 409A Deferred Compensation Plan for Selected Employees, effective December 13, 2005, is attached as Exhibit 9.3 to the company’s Form 8-K, filed on December 7, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
101.(ay) | | First Amendment to the Sauer-Danfoss Inc. 409A Deferred Compensation Plan for Selected Employees effective January 1, 2006, is attached as Exhibit 9.5 to the Companies From 8-K filed on December 7, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
31.1 | | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
31.2 | | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
32.1 | | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
32.2 | | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| Sauer-Danfoss Inc. |
| | |
| By | /s/ KENNETH D. MCCUSKEY | |
| Kenneth D. McCuskey |
| Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, Secretary |
| | |
May 5, 2006 | | |
| | | | |
21