Certain business written by the Company has loss experience generally characterized as having low frequency and high severity. This may result in volatility in both the Company’s results and operational cash flows. Operational cash flows during the first three months of 2003 increased from the same period of 2002 primarily due to the receipt of general and life premiums, in line with the significant growth in net premiums written. In the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the net amount of losses paid by the Company for general operations was $667 million and $608 million, respectively. The increase in net paid losses in the first quarter of 2003 is due to growth in operations and $39.1 million of net losses paid related to the September 11 event.
In the three months ended March 31, 2003, the Company did not make any significant investments in affiliates or other investments.
As at March 31, 2003, the Company had bank, letter of credit and loan facilities available from a variety of sources including commercial banks totaling $4.7 billion, of which $1.9 billion in debt was outstanding. In addition, $2.3 billion of letters of credit were outstanding, 6% of which were collateralized by the Company’s investment portfolio, principally supporting U.S. non-admitted business and the Company’s Lloyd’s capital requirements.
The following tables present the Company’s indebtedness under outstanding securities and lenders’ commitments as at March 31, 2003:
(U.S. dollars in thousands)
The total pre-tax interest expense on the borrowings described above was $22.0 million and $27.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The following table presents, as at March 31, 2003, the Company’s letter of credit facilities available, in use and when those facilities are due to expire:
The Company has several letter of credit facilities provided on a syndicated and bilateral basis from commercial banks. These facilities (as well as the off balance sheet collateral arrangement described below) are principally utilized to support non-admitted insurance and reinsurance operations in the U.S. and capital requirements at Lloyd’s. All of the commercial facilities are scheduled for renewal during the remainder of 2003. In
addition to letters of credit, the Company has established insurance trusts in the U.S. that provide cedants with statutory relief under state insurance regulations in the U.S. It is anticipated that the commercial facilities will be renewed on expiry but such renewals are subject to the availability of credit from banks utilized by the Company. In the event that such credit support is insufficient, the Company could be required to provide alternative security to cedants. This could take the form of additional insurance trusts supported by the Company’s investment portfolio or funds withheld using the Company’s cash resources. The value of letters of credit required is driven by, among other things, loss development of existing reserves, the payment pattern of such reserves, the expansion of business written by the Company and the loss experience of such business.
The Company entered into a new $100.0 million letter of credit facility in January 2003 to provide additional capacity to support the Company’s U.S. non-admitted business. The facility was fully utilized at March 31, 2003.
In February 2003, the Company entered into an aggregate of $300.0 million of commercial paper-based credit facilities (the “Credit Facilities”) and expects to increase these facilities to $500.0 million later in 2003. At maturity, the Company will be obligated to make payments in an amount equal to the principal and accrued interest outstanding under the Credit Facilities. The Company could face additional obligations under the Credit Facilities prior to the stated maturity of February 25, if certain events were to occur, including, but not limited to the Company’s insolvency, withdrawal of assets from the Trust by the ceding company, the downgrade of the Company’s credit ratings below certain specified levels, or the failure of the agent to have a first priority perfected security interest in the collateral posted by the Company.
For information regarding cross-default and certain other provisions in the Company’s debt and convertible securities documents, see Item 7 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
The Company has had several share repurchase programs in the past as part of its capital management strategy. On January 9, 2000, the Board of Directors authorized a program for the repurchase of shares up to $500.0 million. Under this plan, the Company has purchased 6.6 million shares at an aggregate cost of $364.6 million or an average cost of $55.24 per share. The Company has $135.4 million remaining in its share repurchase authorization. During the three months ended March 31, 2003, no shares were repurchased in the open market. The Company has repurchased shares from employees and directors in relation to withholding tax on restricted stock.
Current Outlook
The Company believes that current premium rate increases and favorable terms and conditions generally will continue through 2004 for most lines of property and casualty business that the Company writes. While cash flow from operations is expected to be strong for the remainder of 2003, lower average yields on the investment portfolio could adversely affect future investment income.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company enters into derivatives and other financial instruments primarily for risk management purposes. The Company’s derivative transactions can expose the Company to credit default swap risk, weather and energy risk, investment market risk, and foreign currency exchange rate risk. The Company attempts to manage these risks based on guidelines established by senior management. Derivative instruments are carried at fair value with resulting changes in fair value recognized in income in the period in which they occur.
Value-at-risk (“VaR”) is one of the tools used by management to estimate potential losses in fair values using historical rates, market movements and credit spreads to estimate the volatility and correlation of these factors to calculate the potential loss that could occur over a defined period of time given a certain probability.
This risk management discussion and the estimated amounts generated from the sensitivity and VaR analyses presented in this document are forward-looking statements of market risk assuming certain adverse market conditions occur. Actual results in the future may differ materially from these estimated results due to, among other things, actual developments in the global financial markets. The results of analysis used by the Company to assess and mitigate risk should not be considered projections of future events of losses. See generally “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
Credit Default Swaps
The Company has written certain financial guaranty transactions in derivative or swap form. The Company does not actively trade these transactions and generally issues and holds these contracts to maturity. Changes in fair
30
value can result from changes in market credit spreads, supply and demand for similar type instruments, changes in future loss and/or recovery estimates, interest rates and credit rating upgrades or downgrades. The Company therefore is at risk for changes in fair value due to changes in any of the above factors.
Weather and Energy Risk
The Company offers weather and energy risk management products in insurance or derivative form to end-users, while managing the risks in the over-the-counter and exchange traded derivatives markets. In addition to entering into transactions with end-users (which represents the majority of the Company’s weather and energy derivative transactions), the Company also maintains a smaller weather and energy derivatives trading portfolio. The fair values of these transactions are determined using available market data and internal pricing models using consistent statistical methodologies.
The Company’s aggregate average, low and high seasonal VaR amounts for its weather risk management portfolio, calculated at a 99% confidence level, during the period ended March 31, 2003 were $164.9 million, $154.6 million and $175.6 million, respectively. The corresponding levels for the weather risk management portfolio during the period ended March 31, 2002 were $44.9 million, $25.8 million and $56.3 million, respectively. The Company calculates its aggregate VaR by summing the VaR amounts for each of its seasonal holding portfolios. The Company’s aggregation methodology yields a conservative aggregate portfolio VaR, as current weather events and patterns have an immaterial effect on expectations for future seasons. Therefore, the Company could greatly reduce or eliminate its VaR on future seasons by selling its positions prior to the beginning of a season. At present, the Company’s VaR calcu lation does not exceed $60 million in any one season. Since VaR statistics are estimates based on historical data and market information, VaR should not be viewed as an absolute, predictive gauge of future financial performance or as a way for the Company to predict risk. There can be no assurance that the Company’s actual future losses will not exceed its VaR amounts.
For the Company’s energy portfolio, VaR is calculated using a one-day holding period. Management has established a daily VaR limit for this portfolio of $3.5 million. The Company’s average, low and high daily VaR amounts calculated at a 99% confidence level, during the period ended March 31, 2003 were $2.3 million, $2.0 and $2.7 million, respectively. The corresponding amounts during the period ended March 31, 2002 were $0.5 million, $0.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes the movement in the fair value of weather and energy contracts outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2003:
(U.S. dollars in thousands)
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2003 | |
| |
| |
Fair value of contracts outstanding, beginning of the year | | $ | (6,024 | ) |
Option premiums received, net of premiums realized (1) | | | (110,851 | ) |
Reclassification of settled contracts to realized (2) | | | 68,198 | |
Other changes in fair value (3) | | | (25,947 | ) |
| |
| |
Fair value of contracts outstanding, end of period | | $ | (74,624 | ) |
| |
| |
______________
| (1) | | The Company collected $142.7 million of paid premiums and realized $31.8 million of premiums on expired transactions for a net increase in the balance sheet derivative liability of $110.9 million. |
| | | |
| (2) | | The Company paid $68.2 million to settle derivative positions during the quarter resulting in a reclassification of this amount from unrealized to realized and reduces the derivative liability on the balance sheet. |
| | | |
| (3) | | This represents the effects of changes in commodity prices, the time value of options, and other valuation adjustments of $25.9 million on the Company’s derivative positions, primarily attributable to hedges of the positions that realized $31.8 million of premiums. |
The change in the fair value of contracts outstanding at March 31, 2003 as compared to the beginning of the year is primarily due to the increased volume of weather and energy risk management contracts written during the first quarter of 2003.
31
The following table summarizes the maturity of contracts outstanding as of March 31, 2003:
Source Of Fair Value | | Less Than 1 Year | | 1-3 Years | | 4-5 Years | | Greater Than 5 Years | | Total Fair Value | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Prices actively quoted | | $ | (1,745 | ) | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | (1,745 | ) |
Prices based on models and other valuation methods | | | (84,765 | ) | | 6,715 | | | 5,171 | | | — | | | (72,879 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total fair value of contracts outstanding | | $ | (86,510 | ) | $ | 6,715 | | $ | 5,171 | | $ | — | | $ | (74,624 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
In managing its weather and energy risk management business, the Company seeks to identify, assess, monitor and manage its market, credit, operational and legal risks in accordance with defined policies and procedures. The Company’s senior management takes an active role in the risk management process and has developed and implemented policies and procedures that require specific administrative and business functions to assist in the identification, assessment and control of various risks within the operation. Due to the changing nature of the global marketplace, the Company’s risk management policies, procedures and methodologies are constantly evolving and are subject to ongoing review and modification. Market, credit, operational, legal and other risks are inherent in the Company’s weather and energy risk management business and cannot be wholly eliminated despite the Company’s risk manag ement policies, procedures and methodologies.
Investment Market Risk
The Company’s investment portfolio consists of exposures to fixed income securities, equities, alternative investments, derivatives, business and other investments, and cash. These securities and investments are denominated in both U.S. dollar and foreign currencies.
Through the structure of the Company’s investment portfolio, the Company’s earnings are directly affected by changes in the valuations of the securities and investments held in the investment portfolio. These valuation changes reflect changes in interest rates (eg; changes in the level, slope and curvature of the yield curves, volatility of interest rates, mortgage prepayment speeds and credit spreads), credit quality, equity prices (e.g. changes in prices and volatilities of individual securities, equity baskets and equity indices) and foreign currency exchange rates (e.g. changes in spot prices, forward prices and volatilities of currency rates). Market risk therefore arises due to the uncertainty surrounding the future valuations of these different assets, the factors that impact their values and the impact that this could have on the Company’s earnings.
The Company seeks to manage the risks of the investment portfolio through a combination of asset class, country, industry and security level diversification and investment manager allocations. Further, individual security and issuer exposures are controlled and monitored at the investment portfolio level, via specific investment constraints outlined in investment guidelines and agreed with the external investment professionals. Additional constraints are agreed with the external investment professionals that may address exposures to eligible securities, prohibited investments/transactions, credit quality and general concentration limits.
The Company’s direct use of investment derivatives includes futures, forwards, swaps and option contracts that derive their value from underlying assets, indices, references rates or a combination of these factors. When investment guidelines allow for the use of derivatives, these can generally only be used for the purposes of managing interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk and credit risk, provided the use of such instruments is incorporated in the overall portfolio duration, spread, convexity and other relevant portfolio metrics. The direct use of derivatives is not permitted to economically leverage the portfolio outside of the stated guidelines. Derivatives may also be used to add value to the investment portfolio where market inefficiencies are perceived to exist, to utilize cash holdings to purchase equity indexed derivatives and to adjust the duration of a portfolio of fixed income securities to match the duration of related deposit liabilities.
Investment Value-At-Risk
The VaR of the total investment portfolio at March 31, 2003, based on a 95% confidence level with a one month holding period, was approximately $382.4 million. The VaR of all investment related derivatives excluding investments in affiliates and other investments was approximately $7.0 million. The Company’s investment portfolio VaR as at March 31, 2003 is not necessarily indicative of future VaR levels.
32
To complement the VaR analysis which is based on normal market environments, the Company considers the impact on the investment portfolio in several different historical stress periods to analyze the effect of unusual market conditions. The Company establishes certain historical stress test scenarios which are applied to the actual investment portfolio. As these stress tests and estimated gains and losses are based on historical events, they will not necessarily reflect future stress events or gains and losses from such events. The results of the stress test scenarios are reviewed on a regular basis to ensure they reflect current shareholders equity, market conditions and the Company’s total risk profile. Given the investment portfolio allocations as at March, 31 2003, the Company would expect to lose approximately 4.8% of the portfolio if the most damaging event stress tested was repeated, all other thing s held equal. Given the investment portfolio allocations as at 31 March 2003, the Company would expect to gain approximately 14.2% of the portfolio if the most favorable event stress tested was repeated, all other things held equal. The Company assumes that no action is taken during the stress period to either liquidate or rebalance the portfolio and believes that this fairly reflects the potential decreased liquidity that is often associated with stressed market environments.
Investment Credit Risk
The Company is exposed to credit risk through its portfolio of debt securities which has historically been a significant exposure in the investment portfolio. As at March 31, 2003, the average credit quality of the Company’s total fixed income portfolio, which includes fixed maturities, short term investments, cash and cash equivalents and net payable for investments purchased, was “AA”.
The Company’s total fixed income portfolio credit quality breakdown as at March 31, 2003 is shown in the following table:
Rating | | Percentage of Total Fixed Income Exposure(1) | |
| |
| |
| | | | |
AAA | | | 59.7% | |
AA | | | 14.0% | |
A | | | 13.5% | |
BBB | | | 7.8% | |
BB and Below | | | 5.1% | |
______________
| (1) | | Portfolio includes fixed maturities, short term investments, cash and cash equivalents and net payable for investments purchased. |
Individual corporate holdings in the portfolio are diversified, exceeding 1,000 separate issuer exposures. As at March 31, 2003, the top 10 corporate exposures represented approximately 5% of the total fixed income portfolio (excluding operating cash balances) and approximately 15% of the corporate holdings. The top 10 corporate holdings listed below utilizes a conservative approach to aggregation as it includes unsecured as well as securitized, credit enhanced and collateralized securities issued by parent companies and their affiliates.
Top 10 Corporate Exposures as at March 31, 2003(1) | | Percentage of Total Fixed Income Exposure | |
| |
| |
| | | | |
Citigroup | | | 0.77% | |
JP Morgan Chase | | | 0.72% | |
General Electric | | | 0.68% | |
Ford Motor | | | 0.61% | |
Credit Suisse Group | | | 0.49% | |
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter | | | 0.44% | |
Verizon | | | 0.43% | |
General Motors | | | 0.42% | |
Daimler Chrysler | | | 0.42% | |
American International Group | | | 0.41% | |
______________
| (1) | | Corporate exposures include parent and affiliated companies that issue fixed income securities. In some cases a portion of the market value may be invested in bonds that are securitized or have sufficient credit |
33
| | | enhancement that provides a long-term credit rating that is higher than the rating of the unsecured debt of the parent company. |
Interest Rate and Equity Price Risk
The Company believes that VaR is an appropriate indicator of the risk of the portfolio, however an immediate 100 basis point adverse shift in global treasury government bond curves would result in a decrease in total return of 5.1% or $780.0 million in the Company’s fixed income portfolio at March 31, 2003. It is unlikely that all global yield curves would shift at the same time. In evaluating the impact of price changes in the equity portfolio, a 10% change in equity prices would affect total return by approximately $53.0 million at March 31, 2003.
At March 31, 2003, bond and stock index futures outstanding were $221.9 million with underlying investments having a market value of $1.0 billion. Losses of $0.02 million were realized on these contracts for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The Company reduces its exposure to these futures through offsetting transactions, including options and forwards.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
The Company uses foreign exchange contracts to manage its exposure to the effects of fluctuating foreign currencies on the value of certain of its foreign currency fixed maturities and equity investments. These contracts are not designated as specific hedges for financial reporting purposes and therefore, realized and unrealized gains and losses on these contracts are recorded in income in the period in which they occur. These contracts generally have maturities of three months or less. In addition, where the Company’s investment managers believe potential gains exist in a particular currency, a forward contract may not be entered into. At March 31, 2003 and 2002, forward foreign exchange contracts with notional principal amounts totaling $33.1 million and $61.3 million, respectively were outstanding. The fair value of these contracts as at March 31, 2003 and 2002 was $33.8 million and $60.8 million, respe ctively, with an unrealized loss of $0.7 million in 2003 and an unrealized gain of $0.5 million in 2002. For the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, realized gains of $3.4 million and realized losses of $0.8 million, respectively, and unrealized losses of $1.2 million and unrealized gains of $0.4 million, respectively, were recorded in net realized and unrealized gains and losses on derivative instruments.
The Company attempts to manage the exchange volatility arising on certain administration costs denominated in foreign currencies. Throughout the year, forward contracts are entered into to acquire foreign currencies at an agreed rate in the future. At March 31, 2003, the Company had forward contracts outstanding for the purchase of $6.6 million of Euros at fixed rates. The unrealized gain on these contracts at March 31, 2003 was $0.6 million.
In February 2003, the Company entered into a series of forward exchange contracts to cover approximately 60%, or $110.4 million (£70 million), of the Company’s exposure to a U.K. sterling reinsurance recoverable balance at one of its U.K. based insurance operations. The mark to market value of these contracts was an unrealized gain of $0.8 million at March 31, 2003.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Within the 90 days prior to the date of filing this quarterly report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings.
There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors which could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date the Company carried out its evaluation.
34
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”) provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements. Any prospectus, prospectus supplement, the Company’s Annual Report to ordinary shareholders, any proxy statement, any other Form 10-K, Form 10-Q or Form 8-K of the Company or any other written or oral statements made by or on behalf of the Company may include forward-looking statements which reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Such statements include forward-looking statements both with respect to the Company in general, and to the insurance, reinsurance and financial products and services sectors in particular (both as to underwriting and investment matters). Statements which include the words “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “believe”, “project”, “anticipat e”, “will”, and similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature identify forward-looking statements for purposes of the PSLRA or otherwise.
All forward-looking statements address matters that involve risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in such statements. The Company believes that these factors include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) rate increases and improvements in terms and conditions may not be as large or significant as the Company is currently projecting; (ii) the timely and full recoverability of reinsurance placed by the Company with third parties, or other amounts due to the Company, including, without limitation, amounts due to the Company from the Seller in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Winterthur International; (iii) the projected amount of ceded reinsurance recoverables and the ratings and creditworthiness of reinsurers may change; (iv) the timing of claims payments being faster or the rece ipt of reinsurance recoverables being slower than anticipated by the Company; (v) ineffectiveness or obsolescence of the Company’s business strategy due to changes in current or future market conditions; (vi) increased competition on the basis of pricing, capacity, coverage terms or other factors; (vii) greater frequency or severity of claims and loss activity, including as a result of natural or man-made catastrophic events, than the Company’s underwriting, reserving or investment practices anticipate based on historical experience or industry data; (viii) developments in the world’s financial and capital markets which adversely affect the performance of the Company’s investments and the Company’s access to such markets; (ix) the potential impact on the Company from government-mandated insurance coverage for acts of terrorism; (x) the potential impact of off-balance sheet arrangements on the Company; (xi) developments in bankruptcy proceedings or other developments related to bankru ptcies of companies insofar as they affect property and casualty insurance and reinsurance coverages or claims that the Company may have as a counterparty; (xii) availability of borrowings and letters of credit under the Company’s credit facilities; (xiii) changes in regulation or tax laws applicable to the Company or its subsidiaries, brokers or customers; (xiv) acceptance of the Company’s products and services, including new products and services; (xv) changes in the availability, cost or quality of reinsurance; (xvi) changes in the distribution or placement of risks due to increased consolidation of insurance and reinsurance brokers; (xvii) loss of key personnel; (xviii) the effects of mergers, acquisitions and divestitures; (xix) changes in rating agency policies or practices; (xx) changes in accounting policies or practices or the application thereof; (xxi) legislative or regulatory developments; (xxii) changes in general economic conditions, including inflation, foreign currency exchange rate s and other factors; (xxiii) the effects of business disruption or economic contraction due to war, terrorism or other hostilities; and (xxiv) the other factors set forth in the Company’s other documents on file with the SEC. The foregoing review of important factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included herein or elsewhere. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
35
XL CAPITAL LTD
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
The Company is a party to various legal proceedings, including arbitrations, arising in the ordinary course of business. Such legal proceedings generally relate to claims asserted by or against the Company’s subsidiaries in the ordinary course of their respective insurance, reinsurance and financial products and services operations. The Company does not believe that the eventual resolution of any of the legal proceedings to which it is a party will result in a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Shareholders |
None.
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
(a) Exhibits
99.1* XL Capital Assurance Inc. unaudited condensed financial statements for the three month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002.
99.2* XL Financial Assurance Ltd. unaudited condensed financial statements for the three month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002.
99.3** Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
____________
* Previously filed with XL Capital Ltd's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, filed on May 15, 2003.
** Filed herewith.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
| | XL CAPITAL LTD | |
| | (Registrant) | |
| | | |
Dated: June 18, 2003 | | /S/ BRIAN M. O’HARA | |
| |
| |
| | Brian M. O’Hara | |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer | |
| | | |
Dated: June 18, 2003 | | /S/ JERRY DE ST. PAER | |
| |
| |
| | Jerry de St. Paer | |
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
37
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
XL CAPITAL LTD
Pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C.§§.1350(a) and (b))
I, Brian M. O’Hara, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of XL Capital Ltd;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Dated: June 18, 2003 | | /S/ BRIAN M. O’HARA | |
| |
| |
| | Brian M. O’Hara | |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer | |
38
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
XL CAPITAL LTD
Pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C.§§.1350(a) and (b))
I, Jerry de St. Paer, certify that:
1 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of XL Capital Ltd;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Dated: June 18, 2003 | | /S/ JERRY DE ST. PAER | |
| |
| |
| | Jerry de St. Paer | |
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
39