SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Jan. 31, 2015 |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | |
Basis of Presentation - Consolidation | |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Parent and its subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
|
Basis of Presentation - Segment Reporting | |
The Company has identified two operating segments: stores and eCommerce (its internet websites). The two operating segments have been aggregated into one reportable segment based on the similar nature of products sold, merchandising and distribution processes involved, target customers, and economic characteristics of the two operating segments. |
|
|
Estimates | |
Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires that management make estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Such estimates include those related to merchandise returns, the valuation of inventories, long-lived assets, intangible assets, insurance reserves, contingencies, litigation and assumptions used in the calculation of income taxes and retirement and other post-employment benefits, among others. These estimates and assumptions are based on management's best estimates and judgments. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management adjusts such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in those estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statements in future periods. |
|
|
Reclassifications | |
Reclassifications |
Certain prior year balances presented in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications did not impact the Company's net loss for 2014, 2013 or 2012. |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
The Company considers all highly liquid short-term investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are generally overnight money market investments. |
|
|
Merchandise Inventories | |
Merchandise Inventories |
Merchandise inventories are determined by the retail method. Inherent in the retail inventory method calculation are certain significant management judgments and estimates including, among others, merchandise markups, markdowns and shrinkage, which significantly impact both the ending inventory valuation and the resulting gross margin. |
Factors considered in the determination of permanent markdowns include inventory obsolescence, excess inventories, current and anticipated demand, age of the merchandise, customer preferences and fashion trends. Pursuant to the retail inventory method, permanent markdowns result in the devaluation of inventory and the resulting gross margin reduction is recognized in the period in which the markdown is recorded. |
The Company seeks return privileges from its vendors for damaged inventory or marks the goods out-of-stock. Historically, damaged inventory has been an immaterial factor in the Company's calculation of gross margin. |
The Company regularly records a provision for estimated shrinkage, thereby reducing the carrying value of inventory. A physical inventory of each merchandise department is conducted annually in January, with the recorded amount of inventory adjusted to reflect this physical count. The differences between the estimated amount of shrinkage and the actual amount realized have been insignificant. |
As of January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, approximately 32% and 33%, respectively, of the Company's merchandise inventories were valued using a first-in, first-out ("FIFO") cost basis and approximately 68% and 67%, respectively, of merchandise inventories were valued using a last-in, first-out ("LIFO") cost basis. There was no effect on costs of merchandise sold for LIFO valuations in 2014, 2013 and 2012. If the FIFO method of inventory valuation had been used for all inventories, the Company's merchandise inventories would have been lower by $6,837 at January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014 due to the Company having recognized prior years' cost increases associated with its LIFO calculations. The Company's LIFO calculations yielded inventory increases due to deflation reflected in price indices used. The LIFO method values merchandise sold at the cost of more recent inventory purchases (which the deflationary indices indicated to be lower), resulting in the general inventory on-hand being carried at the older, higher costs. Given these higher values and the promotional retail environment, the Company has reduced the carrying value of its LIFO inventories to an estimated realizable value, with reductions of $53,118 to offset the $59,955 cumulative inventory increases generated by its computation of LIFO inventory as of January 31, 2015 and with reductions of $42,578 to offset the $49,415 cumulative inventory increases generated by its computation of LIFO inventory as of February 1, 2014. |
Costs for merchandise purchases, product development, distribution and customer delivery are included in costs of merchandise sold. |
|
|
Property, Fixtures and Equipment: Depreciation and Amortization | |
Property, Fixtures and Equipment: Depreciation and Amortization |
Depreciation and amortization of property, fixtures and equipment is computed using the straight-line method based upon the shorter of the remaining accounting lease term, if applicable, or the economic life reflected in the following ranges: |
|
Buildings | | 20 to 40 years | | | | | | | | |
Leasehold improvements | | 2 to 15 years | | | | | | | | |
Fixtures and equipment | | 3 to 10 years | | | | | | | | |
No depreciation is recorded until property, fixtures and equipment are placed into service. The Company capitalizes interest incurred during the construction of new facilities or major improvements to existing facilities and development projects that exceed one month. See Note 11 for quantification of capitalized interest in 2014, 2013 and 2012. Repair and maintenance costs are charged to selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expense as incurred. Property retired or sold is removed from asset and accumulated depreciation accounts and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in SG&A expense. |
Costs of major remodeling and improvements on leased stores are capitalized as leasehold improvements. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the accounting lease term or the useful life of the asset. Capital leases are recorded at the lower of fair market value or the present value of future minimum lease payments. Capital leases are amortized in accordance with the provisions codified within Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Subtopic 840-30, Leases—Capital Leases. |
ASC Section 360-10-35, Property, Plant and Equipment—Overall—Subsequent Measurement ("ASC 360-10-35"), requires the Company to test a long-lived asset for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may not be recoverable. If the undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset are insufficient to support the recorded asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount (if any) by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Cash flow estimates are based on historical results, adjusted to reflect the Company's best estimate of future market and operating conditions. Estimates of fair value are determined through various techniques, including discounted cash flow models utilizing a discount rate the Company believes is appropriate and would be used by market participants and market approaches using data that includes recent sales of comparable properties with similar characteristics, as considered necessary. (See Note 3 for quantification of asset impairment charges.) |
|
|
Intangible Assets | |
Intangible Assets |
ASC Section 350-30-35, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—General Intangibles Other than Goodwill—Subsequent Measurement ("ASC 350-30-35") requires the Company to test intangible assets subject to amortization and intangible assets not subject to amortization for impairment. |
We are required to test an intangible asset subject to amortization for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may not be recoverable. If the undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset are insufficient to support the recorded asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount (if any) by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis, which requires certain assumptions and estimates regarding industry economic factors, and utilizes a discount rate the Company believes is appropriate and would be used by market participants. |
Intangible assets not subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. An optional qualitative assessment allows the Company to consider events and circumstances that could affect the fair value of its indefinite-lived intangible assets. If the Company concludes, based on an evaluation of all relevant qualitative factors, that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, it will not be required to perform the quantitative impairment test for that asset. In determining fair value for intangible assets for which a quantitative impairment test must be performed, the Company utilizes a relief from royalty method to determine the assets' fair value. The relief from royalty method estimates the theoretical royalty savings from ownership of these intangible assets. Key assumptions include royalty rates, sales projections and discount rates. The Company utilizes royalty and discount rates it believes are appropriate and would be used by market participants. |
The Company's policy is to conduct impairment testing based on its most current business plans, which reflect anticipated changes in the economy and the industry. (See Note 4 for quantification of intangible asset impairment charges.) |
|
|
Deferred Financing Fees | |
Deferred Financing Fees |
Amounts paid by the Company to secure financing agreements are reflected in other long-term assets and are amortized over the term of the related facility. Amortization of credit facility costs are classified as interest expense. Unamortized amounts at January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014 were $14,502 and $17,397, respectively. |
|
|
Employee Benefit Plans | |
Employee Benefit Plans |
The Company, through its actuary, utilizes assumptions when estimating the liabilities for pension and other employee benefit plans. These assumptions, where applicable, include the discount rates used to determine the actuarial present value of projected benefit obligations, the long-term rate of return on assets and the growth in health care costs. The cost of these benefits is recognized in SG&A expense and the accrued benefits are reported in accrued payroll and benefits, accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities. |
|
|
Income Taxes | |
Income Taxes |
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method, pursuant to ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes ("ASC 740"). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. ASC 740 requires an assessment of whether valuation allowances are needed against deferred tax assets based upon consideration of all available evidence using a "more likely than not" standard. (See Note 16 for further discussion of the Company's valuation allowances.) |
In accordance with ASC 740, the Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. |
|
|
Net Sales and Revenue Recognition | |
Net Sales and Revenue Recognition |
The Company recognizes revenue, which excludes sales tax, at either the point-of-sale or at the time merchandise is delivered to the customer and all significant obligations have been satisfied. The Company has a customer return policy allowing customers to return merchandise, for which a reserve is provided for estimated returns. The reserve is based on historical returns experience, and is reflected as an adjustment to sales and costs of merchandise sold. |
The following table summarizes net sales by merchandise category for each year presented: |
|
Merchandise Category | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Women's Apparel | | $ | 678,526 | | $ | 686,276 | | $ | 708,411 | |
Home | | | 471,259 | | | 459,152 | | | 505,452 | |
Cosmetics | | | 377,442 | | | 391,306 | | | 418,609 | |
Men's Apparel | | | 325,333 | | | 330,411 | | | 339,283 | |
Accessories | | | 273,057 | | | 274,902 | | | 285,144 | |
Footwear | | | 263,516 | | | 266,523 | | | 273,671 | |
Children's Apparel | | | 186,907 | | | 185,248 | | | 196,673 | |
Intimate Apparel | | | 106,792 | | | 108,292 | | | 114,863 | |
Young Contemporary Apparel | | | 69,402 | | | 58,410 | | | 67,090 | |
Other | | | 4,003 | | | 9,548 | | | 10,215 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 2,756,237 | | $ | 2,770,068 | | $ | 2,919,411 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
Other Income | |
Other Income |
The Company currently receives revenues under a credit card program agreement ("CCPA") with Comenity Bank, a subsidiary of Alliance Data Systems Corporation ("ADS"). Pursuant to the CCPA, the Company receives periodic royalties based on a percentage of credit card sales and outstanding credit balances. In 2012, the Company received a signing bonus of $50,000 upon transition of its CCPA to ADS; the signing bonus was recorded as deferred income and is being amortized over the initial seven-year term of the CCPA. The aforementioned revenues are recorded within other income. The Company also licenses space to third parties in its stores and receives compensation based on a percentage of sales made in these departments and receives revenues from customers for delivery of certain items and services. Revenues from gift and merchandise card breakage are included in other income (see "Gift and Merchandise Cards," below). In addition, the Company recovers a portion of its cost from the disposal of damaged or otherwise distressed merchandise; this recovery is recorded within other income. |
|
|
Advertising | |
Advertising |
Advertising production costs are expensed the first time the advertisement is run. Media placement costs are expensed in the period the advertising appears. Total advertising expenses, net of vendor allowances, included in SG&A expense for 2014, 2013 and 2012 were $135,626, $128,266 and $129,349, respectively. Prepaid expenses and other current assets include prepaid advertising costs of $8,016 and $8,264 at January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, respectively. |
|
|
Vendor Allowances | |
Vendor Allowances |
As is standard industry practice, allowances from merchandise vendors are received as reimbursement for charges incurred on marked-down merchandise. Vendor allowances are recorded when determined to be collectable. Allowances are credited to costs of goods sold, provided the allowance is: (1) for merchandise permanently marked down or sold, (2) not predicated on a future purchase, and (3) not predicated on a future increase in the purchase price from the vendor. If the aforementioned criteria are not met, the allowances are recorded as an adjustment to the cost of merchandise capitalized in inventory and reflected as a reduction of costs of merchandise sold when the related merchandise is sold. |
Additionally, allowances are received from vendors in connection with cooperative advertising programs and for reimbursement of certain payroll expenses. To the extent the reimbursements are for specific, incremental and identifiable advertising or payroll costs incurred to sell the vendor's products and do not exceed the costs incurred, they are recognized as a reduction of SG&A expense. If the aforementioned criteria are not met, the allowances are recorded as an adjustment to the cost of merchandise capitalized in inventory and reflected as a reduction of costs of merchandise sold when the related merchandise is sold. |
|
|
Purchase Order Violations | |
Purchase Order Violations |
The Company, consistent with industry practice, mandates that vendor merchandise shipments conform to certain standards. These standards are usually defined in the purchase order and include items such as proper ticketing, security tagging, quantity, packaging, on-time delivery, etc. Failure by vendors to conform to these standards increases the Company's merchandise handling costs. Accordingly, various purchase order violation charges are billed to vendors; these charges are reflected by the Company as a reduction of costs of merchandise sold in the period in which the respective violations occur. The Company establishes reserves for purchase order violations that may become uncollectible. |
|
|
Gift and Merchandise Cards | |
Gift and Merchandise Cards |
The Company sells gift cards to customers at its stores and through its website, and issues merchandise cards as credit for merchandise returned to its stores. These cards do not have expiration dates. Revenues from these cards are recognized when (1) the card is redeemed by the customer, or (2) the likelihood of the card being redeemed by the customer is remote and it is determined that the Company does not have a legal obligation to remit the value of the unredeemed card to relevant jurisdictions ("card breakage"). It is the Company's historical experience that the likelihood of redemption after 60 months from issuance is remote. Should cards become aged 60 months and the Company determines that it is probable that it has no legal obligation to remit the value to relevant jurisdictions, the corresponding liability is relieved. Given the satisfaction of the aforementioned criteria, the Company recognized income from card breakage of $2,103, $2,400 and $2,551 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Gift and merchandise card liabilities are included within accrued expenses. |
|
|
Self-Insurance Liabilities | |
Self-Insurance Liabilities |
The Company is self-insured for certain losses related to workers' compensation and health insurance, although it maintains stop-loss coverage with third party insurers to limit exposure. The estimate of its self-insurance liability contains uncertainty since the Company must use judgment to estimate the ultimate cost that will be incurred to settle reported claims and claims for incidents incurred but not reported as of the balance sheet date. When estimating its self-insurance liability, the Company considers a number of factors which include, but are not limited to, historical claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors and information provided by independent third-party advisors. |
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The carrying values of the Company's cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and financial instruments reported within prepaid expenses and other current assets and other long-term assets approximate fair value. The Company discloses the fair value of its long-term debt in Note 5. Fair value estimates of the Company's long-term debt are determined by quoted prices in active markets or a market approach using prices generated by market transactions or derived from discounted cash flow analyses utilizing a discount rate the Company believes is appropriate and would be used by market participants. |
|
|
Concentration of Credit Risk | |
Concentration of Credit Risk |
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents. The Company manages the credit risk associated with cash and cash equivalents by maintaining cash accounts and investing with high-quality institutions. The Company maintains cash accounts, primarily on an overnight basis, which may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses from maintaining cash accounts in excess of such limits. The Company believes that it is not exposed to any significant risks related to its cash accounts. |
|
|
Operating Leases | |
Operating Leases |
The Company leases a majority of its retail stores under operating leases. Many of the lease agreements contain rent holidays, rent escalation clauses and contingent rent provisions—or some combination of these items. The Company recognizes rent expense in SG&A expense on a straight-line basis over the accounting lease term, which includes lease renewals determined to be reasonably assured. In calculating straight-line rent expense, the Company utilizes an accounting lease term that equals or exceeds the time period used for depreciation. Additionally, the commencement date of the accounting lease term reflects the earlier of the date the Company becomes legally obligated for the rent payments or the date the Company takes possession of the building for initial construction and setup. The excess of rent expense over the actual cash paid is recorded as deferred rent. Leasehold improvement allowances received from landlords and other lease incentives are recorded as deferred rent liabilities and are recognized in SG&A expense on a straight-line basis over the accounting lease term. |
|
|
Share-Based Compensation | |
Share-Based Compensation |
The Company recognizes share-based compensation pursuant to ASC Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation ("ASC 718"). The Company measures the cost of grantee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the award, and recognizes that cost over the period that the grantee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. For performance and service grants with vesting additionally contingent on achievement of a positive total shareholder return measure, the grant date fair value is determined using the Monte Carlo simulation model. For stock option awards, the Company estimates grant date fair value using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. |
|
|
Earnings per Share | |
Earnings per Share |
The Company follows the provisions codified within ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share, pursuant to which unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, whether paid or unpaid, are considered participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings or loss per share ("EPS") according to the two-class method if the impact is dilutive. The Company's unvested service restricted shares and restricted stock units are considered participating securities. However, in the event of a net loss, participating securities are excluded from the calculation of both basic and diluted EPS. |
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss and weighted average shares outstanding used in basic and diluted EPS calculations for each of 2014, 2013 and 2012: |
|
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Basic Loss Per Common Share | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (6,974 | ) | $ | (3,556 | ) | $ | (21,553 | ) |
Less: Income allocated to participating securities | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss available to common shareholders | | $ | (6,974 | ) | $ | (3,556 | ) | $ | (21,553 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | | | 19,417,681 | | | 19,101,742 | | | 18,528,169 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Basic loss per common share | | $ | (0.36 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | (1.16 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted Loss Per Common Share | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (6,974 | ) | $ | (3,556 | ) | $ | (21,553 | ) |
Less: Income allocated to participating securities | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss available to common shareholders | | $ | (6,974 | ) | $ | (3,556 | ) | $ | (21,553 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | | | 19,417,681 | | | 19,101,742 | | | 18,528,169 | |
Common shares issuable—stock options | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding assuming dilution | | | 19,417,681 | | | 19,101,742 | | | 18,528,169 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted loss per common share | | $ | (0.36 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | (1.16 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Due to the Company's net loss position in 2014, 2013 and 2012, weighted average unvested restricted shares and restricted stock units (participating securities) of 702,188, 914,941 and 1,314,491 for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were not considered in the calculation of net loss available to common shareholders used for both basic and diluted EPS. |
In addition, weighted average stock option shares (non-participating securities) totaling 212,750, 363,298 and 841,224 for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average common shares outstanding, as their effect would have been antidilutive. Certain of these stock option shares were excluded solely due to the Company's net loss position. Had the Company reported net income in 2014, 2013 and 2012, these shares would have increased diluted weighted average common shares outstanding by 86,872, 142,068 and 128,452, respectively. |
|
|
Risks and Uncertainties | Risks and Uncertainties |
The diversity of the Company's products, customers and geographic operations reduces the risk that a severe impact will occur in the near term as a result of changes in its customer base, competition or markets. |
In response to economic conditions, the Company has considered the impact of relevant factors on its liquidity and has performed an analysis of the key assumptions in its forecast such as sales, gross margin and SG&A expenses; an evaluation of its relationships with vendors and their factors, including availability of vendor credit; and an analysis of cash requirements, including the Company's inventory and other working capital requirements, capital expenditures and borrowing availability under its credit facility. Based upon these analyses and evaluations, the Company expects its anticipated sources of liquidity will be sufficient to meet its obligations without significant revisions to its planned operations through 2015. |
|
|
Recently Issued Accounting Standards | |
Recently Issued Accounting Standards |
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASU 2014-09"). The new standard provides a single revenue recognition model which is intended to enhance disclosures and improve comparability over a range of industries, companies and geographical boundaries. ASU 2014-09 creates a five-step model that requires companies to exercise judgment when considering all relevant facts and circumstances in the determination of when and how revenue is recognized. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently reviewing the revised guidance and assessing the potential impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
In August 2014, ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern ("ASU 2014-15"), was issued, amending FASB Accounting Standards Subtopic 205-40 to provide guidance about management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term "substantial doubt," (2) require an evaluation every reporting period, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management's plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management's plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that financial statements are issued. ASU 2014-15 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. The Company is currently reviewing the guidance and assessing the potential impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
|