UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORMN-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT
COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-06481
Franklin Municipal Securities Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, CA 94403-1906
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Craig S. Tyle, One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, CA 94403-1906
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 650312-2000
Date of fiscal year end: 5/31
Date of reporting period: 5/31/19
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.

| | | | | | |
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | | | | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund |
Sign up for electronic delivery at franklintempleton.com/edelivery
Internet Delivery of Fund Reports Unless You Request Paper Copies:Effective January 1, 2021, as permitted by the SEC, paper copies of the Fund’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail, unless you specifically request them from the Fund or your financial intermediary. Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and you will be notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided with a website link to access the report.
If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. If you have not signed up for electronic delivery, we would encourage you to join fellow shareholders who have. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications electronically from the Fund by calling (800)632-2301 or by contacting your financial intermediary.
You may elect to continue to receive paper copies of all your future shareholder reports free of charge by contacting your financial intermediary or, if you invest directly with a Fund, calling (800)632-2301 to let the Fund know of your request. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held in your account.
FRANKLIN TEMPLETON
Successful investing begins with ambition. And achievement only comes when you reach for it. That’s why we continually strive to deliver better outcomes for investors. No matter what your goals are, our deep, global investment expertise allows us to offer solutions that can help.
During our more than 70 years of experience, we’ve managed through all kinds of markets—up, down and those in between. We’re always preparing for what may come next. It’s because of this, combined with our strength as one of the world’s largest asset managers that we’ve earned the trust of millions of investors around the world.
Dear Shareholder:
During the 12 months ended May 31, 2019, the U.S. economy continued to grow amid positive economic data and corporate earnings, but financial markets experienced their usual volatility due to trade concerns and geopolitical issues. The U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) increased its federal funds rate by 0.25% at its June, September and December 2018 meetings, bringing the rate from 1.75% at the start of the period to 2.50% byperiod-end. The Fed decided not to raise rates for the remainder of the period and indicated that further rate increases may be on hold for the calendar year.
During the12-month period, the municipal bond market posted moderate returns. The municipal bond market had mixed results against the U.S. Treasury and corporate bond markets, with generally higher returns for longer-term and lower-rated municipal bonds. Factors contributing to this positive investment environment for municipals included relatively low inflation, increased employment and the strength of the U.S. economy.
Franklin Municipal Securities Trust’s annual report, covering Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund and Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund, includes more detail about municipal bond market conditions and a discussion from the portfolio managers. In addition, on our website,franklintempleton.com,you can find updated commentary by our municipal bond experts. Municipal bonds providetax-free income and diversification from equities. Despite periods of volatility, municipal bonds historically have had a solid long-term record of performance, driven mostly by their compounding income component. Please remember all securities markets fluctuate, as do mutual fund share prices.
As always, we recommend investors consult their financial advisors to help them make the best decisions for the long term. In a constantly changing market environment, we remain committed to our disciplined strategy as we manage the Funds, keeping in mind the trust you have placed in us. We appreciate your confidence in us and encourage you to contact us or your financial advisor when you have questions about your Franklin Templetontax-free investment.
Sincerely,

Rupert H. Johnson, Jr.
Chairman
Franklin Municipal Securities Trust

Sheila Amoroso
Senior Vice President and Director
Franklin Municipal Bond Department
This letter reflects our analysis and opinions as of May 31, 2019, unless otherwise indicated. The information is not a complete analysis of every aspect of any market, state, industry, security or fund. Statements of fact are from sources considered reliable.
| | | | | | | | |
Not FDIC Insured | | | | | May Lose Value | | | | | No Bank Guarantee |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Not part of the annual report | | | 1 | |
Contents
Annual Report
|
Visitfranklintempleton.comfor fund updates, to access your account, or to find helpful financial planning tools. |
| | | | |
| | |
2 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
ANNUAL REPORT
Municipal Bond Market Overview
The financial markets experienced volatility during the 12 months ended May 31, 2019, due to trade concerns and geopolitical stress. Equity markets sold off sharply during the fourth quarter of 2018. Stocks quickly reversed course to start 2019, rallying sharply before declining in May. This volatility spurred a flight to perceived quality that benefited high-quality fixed income assets such as municipal bonds and U.S. Treasuries. Municipal bonds posted positive returns in each of the first five months of 2019. Overall, the municipal bond market outperformed the U.S. Treasury and equity markets but underperformed the corporate bond market.
Investment-grade municipal bonds, as measured by the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index, posted a +6.40% total return for the period, while U.S. Treasuries, as measured by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury Index, posted a +6.28% total return, and investment-grade corporate bonds, as measured by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate Bond Index, posted a +7.45% total return.1 U.S. stocks, as represented by the Standard & Poor’s® 500 Index, underperformed the fixed income markets with a +3.78% total return.1
Municipal bonds with intermediate and long maturities generally outperformed bonds with shorter maturities during the12-month period. The best-performing maturity group in the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index was the 12–17 year group, which returned +7.62% for the period.1 High-yield municipal bonds generally outperformed investment-grade municipal bonds, with the Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond Index posting a +7.76% total return, compared with a +6.40% total return for the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index.1
Municipal issuance during the reporting period totaled approximately $339 billion, a 19% decline from total issuance for the preceding12-month period.2 Issuance remains diminished as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 eliminated advanced refundings beginning in January 2018. Calendar-year 2018 issuance was approximately $339 billion, which represented a 24% decline from 2017.2 For the first five months of 2019, issuance is approximately equal to the first five months of 2018. The Investment Company Institute reported negative municipal
bond fund flows during the fourth quarter of 2018, but flows turned sharply positive in the first five months of 2019. Overall, total net municipal bond fund inflows for the12-month period were approximately $37 billion.3 In our view, investor demand remains healthy.
The U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) raised its target range for the federal funds rate by 0.25% at its June, September and December 2018 meetings. The target range stood at 2.25%–2.50% atperiod-end. The Fed also increased the discount rate by 0.25% at all three meetings, to finish the period at 3.00%. The Fed paused at the January, March and April/May 2019 meetings, leaving the discount rate and the target range for the federal funds rate unchanged. Furthermore, the Fed indicated a patient approach in determining future rate adjustments. With market-based inflation measures remaining low in recent months, the market has interpreted the Fed’s recent decisions to mean the Fed will remain on the sidelines and foster economic growth while attempting to achieve its inflation objective.
Atperiod-end, we maintained our positive view of the municipal bond market. We believe municipal bonds continue to be an attractive asset class among fixed income securities, and we intend to follow our disciplined approach of investing to maximize income, while seeking value in the municipal bond market.
The foregoing information reflects our analysis, opinions and portfolio holdings as of May 31, 2019, the end of the reporting period. The way we implement our main investment strategies and the resulting portfolio holdings may change depending on factors such as market and economic conditions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice or an offer for a particular security. The information is not a complete analysis of every aspect of any market, state, industry, security or the Fund. Statements of fact are from sources considered reliable, but the investment manager makes no representation or warranty as to their completeness or accuracy. Although historical performance is no guarantee of future results, these insights may help you understand our investment management philosophy.
1. Source: Morningstar. Treasuries, if held to maturity, offer a fixed rate of return and a fixed principal value; their interest payments and principal are guaranteed.
2. Source: The Bond Buyer, Thomson Reuters.
3. Source: Investment Company Institute.
See www.franklintempletondatasources.com for additional data provider information.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 3 | |
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund
This annual report for Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund covers the fiscal year ended May 31, 2019.
Your Fund’s Goal and Main Investments
The Fund seeks to provide a high level of income exempt from federal and California personal income taxes by investing at least 80% of its net assets in municipal securities in any rating category, including higher-yielding, lower-rated securities, that pay interest free from such taxes.1 Its secondary goal is capital appreciation to the extent possible and consistent with its principal goal.
| | | | |
Credit Quality Composition* | | | | |
5/31/19 | | | | |
| |
Ratings | | % of Total Investments | |
| |
AAA | | | 1.63% | |
| |
AA | | | 17.27% | |
| |
A | | | 18.54% | |
| |
BBB | | | 18.03% | |
| |
Below Investment Grade | | | 8.61% | |
| |
Refunded | | | 7.77% | |
| |
Not Rated | | | 28.15% | |
| |
*Securities, except for those labeled Not Rated, are assigned ratings by one or more Nationally Recognized Statistical Credit Rating Organizations (NRSROs), such as Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch, that can be considered by the investment manager as part of its independent securities analysis. When ratings from multiple agencies are available, the highest is used, consistent with the portfolio investment process. Ratings reflect an NRSRO’s opinion of an issuer’s creditworthiness and typically range from AAA (highest) to D (lowest). The Below Investment Grade category consists of bonds rated belowBBB-. The Refunded category generally consists of refunded bonds secured by U.S. government or other high-quality securities and not rerated by an NRSRO. The Not Rated category consists of ratable securities that have not been rated by an NRSRO. Cash and equivalents are excluded from this composition.
Performance Overview
The Fund’s Class A share price, as measured by net asset value, increased from $10.70 on September 10, 2018, to $11.10 on May 31, 2019.2 The Fund’s Class A shares paid dividends totaling 28.44 cents per share for the reporting
period.3 The Performance Summary beginning on page 7 shows that at the end of this reporting period the Fund’s Class A shares’ distribution rate was 3.25% based on an annualization of May’s 3.12 cent per share dividend and the maximum offering price of $11.53 on May 31, 2019. An investor in the 2019 maximum combined effective federal and California personal income tax bracket of 53.10% (including 3.80% Medicare tax) would need to earn a distribution rate of 6.93% from a taxable investment to match the Fund’s Class A tax-free distribution rate. For other performance data, please see the Performance Summary. Dividend distributions were affected by low interest rates during the period. This and other factors resulted in reduced income for the portfolio and caused dividends to be lower at the end of the period.
Performance data represent past performance, which does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or loss when you sell your shares. Current performance may differ from figures shown. For most recentmonth-end performance, go tofranklintempleton.comor call(800)342-5236.
State Update
California’s large and diverse economy continued to expand during the 12 months under review. High-profile educational institutions and an innovative business environment supported the state’s expansion. Unemployment remained unchanged from 4.2% in May 2018 to 4.2% atperiod-end, which was higher than the 3.6% national rate.4
California’s fiscal year 2018 budget, which ended June 30, extended the state’s recent track record of balanced fiscal operations. Highlights of the budget were increased spending for general fund expenditures, education, Medi-Cal funding and pension contributions. The state continued to make deposits to its budget stabilization account, resulting in large budget reserves. California’s growing economy, a strong stock market, and an abundance of high-income taxpayers have all helped to improve the budget for the state.
1. The Fund may invest up to 100% of its assets in bonds whose interest payments are subject to federal alternative minimum tax. All or a significant portion of the income on these obligations may be subject to such tax. Distributions of capital gains are generally taxable. To avoid imposition of 28% backup withholding on all Fund distributions and redemption proceeds, U.S. investors must be properly certified on FormW-9 andnon-U.S. investors on FormW-8BEN.
2. Effective 9/10/18, the Fund began offering Class A shares. See the prospectus for details.
3. The distribution amount is the sum of all net investment income distributions for the period shown. Assumes shares were purchased and held for the entire accrual period.
Since dividends accrue daily, your actual distributions will vary depending on the date you purchased your shares and any account activity. All Fund distributions will vary depending upon current market conditions, and past distributions are not indicative of future trends.
4. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The dollar value, number of shares or principal amount, and names of all portfolio holdings are listed in the Fund’s Statement of Investments (SOI).
The SOI begins on page 23.
| | | | |
| | |
4 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN CALIFORNIA HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividend Distributions* | |
6/1/18–5/31/19 | |
| |
| | Dividend per Share (cents) | |
| | | |
| | | | | |
Month | | Class A** | | Class A1 | | Class C | | | Class R6 | | | Advisor Class | |
| |
June | | — | | 3.28 | | | 2.79 | | | | 3.39 | | | | 3.36 | |
| |
July | | — | | 3.28 | | | 2.79 | | | | 3.39 | | | | 3.36 | |
| |
August | | — | | 3.31 | | | 2.82 | | | | 3.42 | | | | 3.39 | |
| |
September | | 2.06 | | 3.36 | | | 2.86 | | | | 3.47 | | | | 3.44 | |
| |
October | | 3.25 | | 3.39 | | | 2.89 | | | | 3.50 | | | | 3.47 | |
| |
November | | 3.30 | | 3.44 | | | 2.94 | | | | 3.55 | | | | 3.52 | |
| |
December | | 3.30 | | 3.44 | | | 2.95 | | | | 3.54 | | | | 3.52 | |
| |
January | | 3.30 | | 3.44 | | | 2.95 | | | | 3.54 | | | | 3.52 | |
| |
February | | 3.30 | | 3.44 | | | 2.95 | | | | 3.54 | | | | 3.52 | |
| |
March | | 3.30 | | 3.44 | | | 2.94 | | | | 3.54 | | | | 3.52 | |
| |
April*** | | 3.51 | | 3.65 | | | 3.15 | | | | 3.75 | | | | 3.73 | |
| |
May | | 3.12 | | 3.27 | | | 2.78 | | | | 3.39 | | | | 3.37 | |
| |
Total | | 28.44 | | 40.74 | | | 34.81 | | | | 42.02 | | | | 41.72 | |
| |
*The distribution amount is the sum of all net investment income distributions for the period shown. Assumes shares were purchased and held for the entire accrual period. Since dividends accrue daily, your actual distributions will vary depending on the date you purchased your shares and any account activity. All Fund distributions will vary depending upon current market conditions, and past distributions are not indicative of future trends.
**Effective 9/10/18, the Fund began offering Class A shares. See the prospectus for details.
***Effective May 1, 2019, the dividend policy of the Fund changed from managed pay to variable pay. With this change, the Fund paid aone-time higher than usual dividend in April, as a result of the Fund paying out excess undistributed net income, before transitioning to the variable pay policy in May.
The state’s budget for fiscal year 2019, which started in July 2018, mirrored the 2018 budget, with continued deposits to reserve funds and increased spending for general fund expenditures, education and Medi-Cal. State pension contributions also continued to rise, representing a persistent source of fiscal pressure.
California’s nettax-supported debt was $2,194 per capita and 3.7% of personal income, compared with the $1,068 and 2.2% national medians, respectively.5 During the period under review, independent credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s (S&P) affirmed California’s general obligations bonds rating ofAA- with a stable outlook.6 The rating reflected S&P’s view on the state’s diverse and expanding economy, demonstrated commitment to paying down budgetary debts, solid budgetary reserve levels, strong liquidity, and declining, though moderately high, debt ratios. In contrast, S&P cited several challenges to the state, including the persistently
high cost of housing,difficult-to-forecast revenues, minimal funding of retiree health care benefits, and a large backlog of deferred maintenance and infrastructure needs. The stable outlook reflected S&P’s view that California has brought its finances into structural alignment. However, the state is vulnerable to an unanticipated economic downturn and uncertainty about the new governor’s commitment to maintaining fiscal balance.
| | | | |
Portfolio Composition | | | | |
5/31/19 | | | | |
| |
| | % of Total Investments | |
| |
Tax-Supported | | | 24.22% | |
| |
Transportation | | | 14.23% | |
| |
Hospital & Health Care | | | 12.26% | |
| |
General Obligation | | | 11.08% | |
| |
Other Revenue | | | 9.79% | |
| |
Refunded | | | 9.30% | |
| |
Utilities | | | 6.22% | |
| |
Housing | | | 4.69% | |
| |
Higher Education | | | 4.42% | |
| |
Subject to Government Appropriations | | | 2.85% | |
| |
Corporate-Backed | | | 0.94% | |
| |
Investment Strategy
We use a consistent, disciplined strategy in an effort to maximizetax-exempt income for our shareholders, while balancing risk and return within the Fund’s range of allowable investments. We generally employ abuy-and-hold approach and invest in securities we believe should provide the most relative value in the market. We do not use leverage or derivatives, nor do we use hedging techniques that could add volatility and contribute to underperformance in adverse markets.
5. Source: Moody’s Investors Service, State government – US: Medians – Flat debt total signals cautious borrowing, despite infrastructure needs, 6/3/19.
6. This does not indicate S&P’s rating of the Fund.
See www.franklintempletondatasources.com for additional data provider information.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 5 | |
FRANKLIN CALIFORNIA HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND
Manager’s Discussion
Consistent with our strategy, we sought to remain invested in bonds that have an average weighted maturity of 15 to 30 years with good call features. Based on the combination of our value-oriented philosophy of investing primarily for income and a positively sloping municipal yield curve, in which interest rates for longer-term bonds are higher than those for shorter-term bonds, we favored the use of longer-term bonds. We believe our conservative,buy-and-hold investment strategy can help us achieve high, current,tax-free income for shareholders.
Thank you for your continued participation in Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund. We look forward to serving your future investment needs.
The foregoing information reflects our analysis, opinions and portfolio holdings as of May 31, 2019, the end of the reporting period. The way we implement our main investment strategies and the resulting portfolio holdings may change depending on factors such as market and economic conditions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice or an offer for a particular security. The information is not a complete analysis of every aspect of any market, state, industry, security or the Fund. Statements of fact are from sources considered reliable, but the investment manager makes no representation or warranty as to their completeness or accuracy. Although historical performance is no guarantee of future results, these insights may help you understand our investment management philosophy.
| | | | |
| | |
6 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN CALIFORNIA HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND
Performance Summary as of May 31, 2019
The performance tables and graphs do not reflect any taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund dividends, capital gain distributions, if any, or any realized gains on the sale of Fund shares. Total return reflects reinvestment of the Fund’s dividends and capital gain distributions, if any, and any unrealized gains or losses. Your dividend income will vary depending on dividends or interest paid by securities in the Fund’s portfolio, adjusted for operating expenses of each class. Capital gain distributions are net profits realized from the sale of portfolio securities.
Performance as of 5/31/19
Cumulative total return excludes sales charges. Average annual total return includes maximum sales charges. Sales charges will vary depending on the size of the investment and the class of share purchased. The maximum is 3.75% and the minimum is 0%.Class A:3.75% maximum initial sales charge;Advisor Class:no sales charges. For other share classes, visitfranklintempleton.com.
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Share Class | | Cumulative Total Return1 | | | Average Annual Total Return2 | |
| | |
A3,4 | | | | | | | | |
1-Year | | | +7.62% | | | | +3.59% | |
| | |
5-Year | | | +28.88% | | | | +4.40% | |
| | |
10-Year | | | +105.16% | | | | +7.04% | |
| | |
Advisor | | | | | | | | |
| | |
1-Year | | | +7.64% | | | | +7.64% | |
| | |
5-Year | | | +29.51% | | | | +5.31% | |
| | |
10-Year | | | +107.36% | | | | +7.57% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share Class | | Distribution Rate5 | | | Taxable Equivalent Distribution Rate6 | | | 30-Day Standardized Yield7 | | | Taxable Equivalent 30-Day Standardized Yield6 | |
A | | | 3.25% | | | | 6.93% | | | | 2.21% | | | | 4.71% | |
Advisor | | | 3.64% | | | | 7.76% | | | | 2.55% | | | | 5.44% | |
Performance data represent past performance, which does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or loss when you sell your shares. Current performance may differ from figures shown. For most recentmonth-end performance, go tofranklintempleton.comor call(800)342-5236.
See page 9 for Performance Summary footnotes.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 7 | |
FRANKLIN CALIFORNIA HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Total Return Index Comparison for a Hypothetical $10,000 Investment
Total return represents the change in value of an investment over the periods shown. It includes any applicable maximum sales charge, Fund expenses, account fees and reinvested distributions. The unmanaged indexes include reinvestment of any income or distributions. They differ from the Fund in composition and do not pay management fees or expenses. One cannot invest directly in an index.
Class A (6/1/09–5/31/19)

Advisor Class (6/1/09–5/31/19)

See page 9 for Performance Summary footnotes.
| | | | |
| | |
8 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN CALIFORNIA HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
| | | | |
Distributions (6/1/18–5/31/19) | | | | |
| |
Share Class | | Net Investment Income | |
A (9/10/18–5/31/19) | | | $0.2844 | |
A1 | | | $0.4074 | |
C | | | $0.3481 | |
R6 | | | $0.4202 | |
Advisor | | | $0.4172 | |
Total Annual Operating Expenses10
| | | | |
Share Class | | | | |
A | | | 0.80% | |
Advisor | | | 0.55% | |
Each class of shares is available to certain eligible investors and has different annual fees and expenses, as described in the prospectus.
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. Because municipal bonds are sensitive to interest-rate movements, the Fund’s yield and share price will fluctuate with market conditions. Bond prices generally move in the opposite direction of interest rates. Thus, as prices of bonds in the Fund adjust to a rise in interest rates, the Fund’s share price may decline. Because the Fund invests principally in a single state, it is subject to greater risk of adverse economic and regulatory changes in that state than a geographically diversified fund. Investments in lower rated bonds include higher risk of default and loss of principal. Puerto Rico municipal bonds have been impacted by recent adverse economic and market changes, which may cause the Fund’s share price to decline. Changes in the credit rating of a bond, or in the credit rating or financial strength of a bond’s issuer, insurer or guarantor, may affect the bond’s value. The Fund may invest a significant part of its assets in municipal securities that finance similar types of projects, such as utilities, hospitals, higher education and transportation. A change that affects one project would likely affect all similar projects, thereby increasing market risk. The Fund is actively managed but there is no guarantee that the manager’s investment decisions will produce the desired results. The Fund’s prospectus also includes a description of the main investment risks.
1. Cumulative total return represents the change in value of an investment over the periods indicated.
2. Average annual total return represents the average annual change in value of an investment over the periods indicated. Return for less than one year, if any, has not been annualized.
3. Effective 9/10/18, Class A shares closed to new investors, were renamed Class A1 shares, and a new Class A share with a different expense structure became available. Class A performance shown has been calculated as follows: (a) for periods prior to 9/10/18, a restated figure is used based on the Fund’s Class A1 performance that includes any Rule12b-1 rate differential that exists between Class A1 and Class A; and (b) for periods after 9/10/18, actual Class A performance is used, reflecting all charges and fees applicable to that class.
4. Prior to 3/1/19, these shares were offered at a higher initial sales charge of 4.25%, thus actual returns (with sales charges) would have differed. Average annual total returns (with sales charges) have been restated to reflect the current maximum initial sales charge of 3.75%.
5. Distribution rate is based on an annualization of the respective class’s May dividend and the maximum offering price (NAV for Advisor Class) per share on 5/31/19.
6. Taxable equivalent distribution rate and yield assume the published rates as of 12/18/18 for the maximum combined effective federal and California state personal income tax rate of 53.10%, based on the federal income tax rate of 37.00% plus 3.80% Medicare tax.
7. The Fund’s30-day standardized yield is calculated over a trailing30-day period using the yield to maturity on bonds and/or the dividends accrued on stocks. It may not equal the Fund’s actual income distribution rate, which reflects the Fund’s past dividends paid to shareholders.
8. Source: Morningstar. The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is a market value-weighted index engineered for the long-termtax-exempt bond market. To be included in the index, bonds must be fixed rate, have at least one year to final maturity and be rated investment grade(Baa3/BBB- or higher) by at least two of the following agencies: Moody’s, S&P and Fitch.
9. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, bls.gov/cpi. The Consumer Price Index is a commonly used measure of the inflation rate.
10. Figures are as stated in the Fund’s current prospectus and may differ from the expense ratios disclosed in the Your Fund’s Expenses and Financial Highlights sections in this report. In periods of market volatility, assets may decline significantly, causing total annual Fund operating expenses to become higher than the figures shown.
See www.franklintempletondatasources.com for additional data provider information.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 9 | |
FRANKLIN CALIFORNIA HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND
Your Fund’s Expenses
As a Fund shareholder, you can incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on Fund purchases and redemptions; and (2) ongoing Fund costs, including management fees, distribution and service(12b-1) fees, and other Fund expenses. All mutual funds have ongoing costs, sometimes referred to as operating expenses. The table below shows ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and can help you understand these costs and compare them with those of other mutual funds. The table assumes a $1,000 investment held for the six months indicated.
Actual Fund Expenses
The table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses in the columns under the heading “Actual.” In these columns the Fund’s actual return, which includes the effect of Fund expenses, is used to calculate the “Ending Account Value” for each class of shares. You can estimate the expenses you paid during the period by following these steps (ofcourse, your account value and expenses will differ from those in this illustration):Divide your account value by $1,000 (ifyour account had an $8,600 value, then $8,600÷ $1,000 = 8.6). Then multiply the result by the number in the row for your class of shares under the headings “Actual” and “Expenses Paid During Period” (ifActual Expenses Paid During Period were $7.50, then 8.6 x $7.50 = $64.50). In this illustration, the actual expenses paid this period are $64.50.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison with Other Funds
Under the heading “Hypothetical” in the table, information is provided about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. This information may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period, but it can help you compare ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with those of other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example for the class of shares you hold with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Please note that expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight ongoing costs and do not reflect any transactional costs. Therefore, information under the heading “Hypothetical” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you compare total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if transactional costs were included, your total costs would have been higher.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Actual (actual return after expenses) | | | | Hypothetical (5% annual return before expenses) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share Class | | Beginning Account Value 12/1/18 | | | | Ending Account Value 5/31/19 | | Expenses Paid During Period 12/1/18–5/31/191, 2 | | | | Ending Account Value 5/31/19 | | Expenses Paid During Period 12/1/18–5/31/191, 2 | | | | Net Annualized Expense Ratio2 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
A | | $1,000 | | | | $1,074.70 | | $4.34 | | | | $1,020.74 | | $4.23 | | | | 0.84% |
A1 | | $1,000 | | | | $1,074.60 | | $3.57 | | | | $1,021.49 | | $3.48 | | | | 0.69% |
C | | $1,000 | | | | $1,072.10 | | $6.41 | | | | $1,018.75 | | $6.24 | | | | 1.24% |
R6 | | $1,000 | | | | $1,076.00 | | $2.90 | | | | $1,022.14 | | $2.82 | | | | 0.56% |
Advisor | | $1,000 | | | | $1,075.90 | | $3.05 | | | | $1,021.99 | | $2.97 | | | | 0.59% |
1. Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio for thesix-month period as indicated above—in the far right column—multiplied by the simple average account value over the period indicated, and then multiplied by 182/365 to reflect theone-half year period.
2. Reflects expenses after fee waivers and expense reimbursements, for Class R6.
| | | | |
| | |
10 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund
This annual report for Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund covers the fiscal year ended May 31, 2019.
Your Fund’s Goal and Main Investments
The Fund seeks to maximize income exempt from federal and Tennessee personal income taxes, consistent with prudent investing and the preservation of capital, by investing at least 80% of its net assets in investment grade municipal securities that pay interest free from such taxes.1
Credit Quality Composition*
5/31/19
| | | | |
Ratings | | % of Total Investments | |
AAA | | | 2.93% | |
AA | | | 56.79% | |
A | | | 17.87% | |
BBB | | | 5.30% | |
Below Investment Grade | | | 1.83% | |
Refunded | | | 13.91% | |
Not Rated | | | 1.37% | |
*Securities, except for those labeled Not Rated, are assigned ratings by one or more Nationally Recognized Statistical Credit Rating Organizations (NRSROs), such as Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch, that can be considered by the investment manager as part of its independent securities analysis. When ratings from multiple agencies are available, the highest is used, consistent with the portfolio investment process. Ratings reflect an NRSRO’s opinion of an issuer’s creditworthiness and typically range from AAA (highest) to D (lowest). The Below Investment Grade category consists of bonds rated belowBBB-. The Refunded category generally consists of refunded bonds secured by U.S. government or other high-quality securities and not rerated by an NRSRO. The Not Rated category consists of ratable securities that have not been rated by an NRSRO. Cash and equivalents are excluded from this composition.
Performance Overview
The Fund’s Class A share price, as measured by net asset value, decreased from $10.74 on September 10, 2018, to $10.97 on May 31, 2019.2 The Fund’s Class A shares paid dividends totaling 24.68 cents per share for the reporting period.3 The Performance Summary beginning on page 14 shows that at the end of this reporting period the Fund’s
Class A shares’ distribution rate was 2.73% based on an annualization of May’s 2.59 cent per share dividend and the maximum offering price of $11.40 on May 31, 2019. An investor in the 2019 maximum combined effective federal and Tennessee personal income tax bracket of 42.80% (including 3.80% Medicare tax) would need to earn a distribution rate of 4.77% from a taxable investment to match the Fund’s Class Atax-free distribution rate. For other performance data, please see the Performance Summary.
Performance data represent past performance, which does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or loss when you sell your shares. Current performance may differ from figures shown. For most recentmonth-end performance, go tofranklintempleton.comor call(800)342-5236.
State Update
Over the 12 months under review, Tennessee’s economy continued to grow, though mostly in the areas of trade and manufacturing. The state is a distribution and manufacturing hub partly due to its access to the Mississippi River, transportation network and abundant supply of land. Tennessee’s unemployment rate decreased from 3.6% in May 2018 to 3.3% atperiod-end and was below the nation’s 3.6% average.4
Tennessee’s fiscal year 2018 budget included modest spending reductions and additional funding for the rainy day reserve. Furthermore, the enacted budget featured funding for state employee pay increases, employee retirement program and other post-employment benefits, and education. The state approved increases in the gas tax, vehicle fees and the alternative fuels tax. Conversely, the state reduced certain taxes, including the sales tax on food and the tax rate on dividends and interest income. The state’s budget for fiscal year 2019, which began July 1, includes increased spending onK-12 and higher education, infrastructure and the state’s Medicaid system.
1. The Fund may invest up to 100% of its assets in bonds whose interest payments are subject to federal alternative minimum tax. All or a significant portion of the income on these obligations may be subject to such tax. Distributions of capital gains are generally taxable. To avoid imposition of 28% backup withholding on all Fund distributions and redemption proceeds, U.S. investors must be properly certified on FormW-9 andnon-U.S. investors on FormW-8BEN.
2. Effective 9/10/18, the Fund began offering Class A shares. See the prospectus for details.
3. The distribution amount is the sum of all net investment income distributions for the period shown. Assumes shares were purchased and held for the entire accrual period. Since dividends accrue daily, your actual distributions will vary depending on the date you purchased your shares and any account activity. All Fund distributions will vary depending upon current market conditions, and past distributions are not indicative of future trends.
4. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The dollar value, number of shares or principal amount, and names of all portfolio holdings are listed in the Fund’s Statement of Investments (SOI).
The SOI begins on page 45.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 11 | |
FRANKLIN TENNESSEE MUNICIPAL BOND FUND
Dividend Distributions*
6/1/18–5/31/19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | Dividend per Share (cents) | |
| | | | |
Month | | Class A** | | | Class A1 | | | Class R6 | | | Advisor Class | |
June | | | — | | | | 2.69 | | | | 2.79 | | | | 2.77 | |
July | | | — | | | | 2.69 | | | | 2.79 | | | | 2.77 | |
August | | | — | | | | 2.69 | | | | 2.79 | | | | 2.77 | |
September | | | 1.70 | | | | 2.79 | | | | 2.91 | | | | 2.88 | |
October | | | 2.65 | | | | 2.79 | | | | 2.91 | | | | 2.88 | |
November | | | 2.65 | | | | 2.79 | | | | 2.91 | | | | 2.88 | |
December | | | 2.65 | | | | 2.79 | | | | 2.90 | | | | 2.87 | |
January | | | 2.65 | | | | 2.79 | | | | 2.90 | | | | 2.87 | |
February | | | 2.65 | | | | 2.79 | | | | 2.90 | | | | 2.87 | |
March | | | 2.65 | | | | 2.79 | | | | 2.90 | | | | 2.87 | |
April*** | | | 4.49 | | | | 4.63 | | | | 4.74 | | | | 4.71 | |
May | | | 2.59 | | | | 2.75 | | | | 2.85 | | | | 2.84 | |
Total | | | 24.68 | | | | 34.98 | | | | 36.29 | | | | 35.98 | |
*The distribution amount is the sum of all net investment income distributions for the period shown. Assumes shares were purchased and held for the entire accrual period. Since dividends accrue daily, your actual distributions will vary depending on the date you purchased your shares and any account activity. All Fund distributions will vary depending upon current market conditions, and past distributions are not indicative of future trends.
**Effective 9/10/18, the Fund began offering Class A shares. See the prospectus for details.
***Effective May 1, 2019, the dividend policy of the Fund changed from managed pay to variable pay. With this change, the Fund paid aone-time higher than usual dividend in April, as a result of the Fund paying out excess undistributed net income, before transitioning to the variable pay policy in May.
Tennessee’s nettax-supported debt was relatively low at $305 per capita and 0.7% of personal income, compared with the $1,068 and 2.2% national medians, respectively.5 During the period under review, independent credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s (S&P) maintained the state’s general obligations bonds AAA rating with a stable outlook.6 The rating reflected S&P’s view of the state’s sustained growth, financial flexibility, strong financial management practices and performance, robust pension funding practices and low debt burden. The outlook reflected S&P’s view of Tennessee’s strong management of its long-term liabilities and anticipated economic growth, supported by its growing reserves and employment. S&P considers a sharp downturn in the state’s economy unlikely in the next two years.
Investment Strategy
We use a consistent, disciplined strategy in an effort to maximizetax-exempt income for our shareholders, while balancing risk and return within the Fund’s range of allowable investments. We generally employ abuy-and-hold approach and invest in securities we believe should provide the most relative value in the market. We do not use leverage or derivatives, nor do we use hedging techniques that could add volatility and contribute to underperformance in adverse markets.
Portfolio Composition
5/31/19
| | | | |
| |
| | % of Total Investments | |
Utilities | | | 26.07% | |
Hospital & Health Care | | | 20.08% | |
Refunded | | | 14.42% | |
Higher Education | | | 10.34% | |
General Obligation | | | 9.84% | |
Transportation | | | 8.28% | |
Housing | | | 5.49% | |
Other Revenue | | | 4.88% | |
Subject to Government Appropriations | | | 0.60% | |
Manager’s Discussion
Consistent with our strategy, we sought to remain invested in bonds that have an average weighted maturity of 15 to 30 years with good call features. Based on the combination of our value-oriented philosophy of investing primarily for income and a positively sloping municipal yield curve, in which interest rates for longer-term bonds are higher than those for shorter-term bonds, we favored the use of longer-term bonds. We believe our conservative,buy-and-hold investment strategy can help us achieve high, current,tax-free income for shareholders.
Thank you for your continued participation in Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund. We look forward to serving your future investment needs.
5. Source: Moody’s Investors Service, State government – US: Medians – Flat debt total signals cautious borrowing, despite infrastructure needs, 6/3/19.
6. This does not indicate S&P’s rating of the Fund.
See www.franklintempletondatasources.com for additional data provider information.
| | | | |
| | |
12 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN TENNESSEE MUNICIPAL BOND FUND
The foregoing information reflects our analysis, opinions and portfolio holdings as of May 31, 2019, the end of the reporting period. The way we implement our main investment strategies and the resulting portfolio holdings may change depending on factors such as market and economic conditions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice or an offer for a particular security. The information is not a complete analysis of every aspect of any market, state, industry, security or the Fund. Statements of fact are from sources considered reliable, but the investment manager makes no representation or warranty as to their completeness or accuracy. Although historical performance is no guarantee of future results, these insights may help you understand our investment management philosophy.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 13 | |
FRANKLIN TENNESSEE MUNICIPAL BOND FUND
Performance Summary as of May 31, 2019
The performance tables and graphs do not reflect any taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund dividends, capital gain distributions, if any, or any realized gains on the sale of Fund shares. Total return reflects reinvestment of the Fund’s dividends and capital gain distributions, if any, and any unrealized gains or losses. Your dividend income will vary depending on dividends or interest paid by securities in the Fund’s portfolio, adjusted for operating expenses of each class. Capital gain distributions are net profits realized from the sale of portfolio securities.
Performance as of 5/31/19
Cumulative total return excludes sales charges. Average annual total return includes maximum sales charges. Sales charges will vary depending on the size of the investment and the class of share purchased. The maximum is 3.75% and the minimum is 0%.Class A:3.75% maximum initial sales charge;Advisor Class:no sales charges. For other share classes, visitfranklintempleton.com.
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Share Class | | Cumulative Total Return1 | | | Average Annual Total Return2 | |
| | |
A3,4 | | | | | | | | |
1-Year | | | +4.89% | | | | +0.96% | |
5-Year | | | +13.02% | | | | +1.70% | |
10-Year | | | +42.49% | | | | +3.21% | |
| | |
Advisor5 | | | | | | | | |
1-Year | | | +5.12% | | | | +5.12% | |
5-Year | | | +13.48% | | | | +2.56% | |
10-Year | | | +42.99% | | | | +3.64% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Share Class | | Distribution Rate6 | | | Taxable Equivalent Distribution Rate7 | | | 30-Day Standardized Yield8 | | | Taxable Equivalent 30-Day Standardized Yield7 | |
A | | | 2.73% | | | | 4.77% | | | | 1.42% | | | | 2.48% | |
Advisor | | | 3.11% | | | | 5.44% | | | | 1.73% | | | | 3.02% | |
Performance data represent past performance, which does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or loss when you sell your shares. Current performance may differ from figures shown. For most recentmonth-end performance, go tofranklintempleton.comor call(800)342-5236.
See page 16 for Performance Summary footnotes.
| | | | |
| | |
14 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN TENNESSEE MUNICIPAL BOND FUND
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Total Return Index Comparison for a Hypothetical $10,000 Investment
Total return represents the change in value of an investment over the periods shown. It includes any applicable maximum sales charge, Fund expenses, account fees and reinvested distributions. The unmanaged indexes include reinvestment of any income or distributions. They differ from the Fund in composition and do not pay management fees or expenses. One cannot invest directly in an index.
Class A (6/1/09–5/31/19)

Advisor Class(6/1/09–5/31/19)

See page 16 for Performance Summary footnotes.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 15 | |
FRANKLIN TENNESSEE MUNICIPAL BOND FUND
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Distributions(6/1/18–5/31/19)
| | | | |
Share Class | | Net Investment Income | |
| |
A (9/10/18–5/31/19) | | | $0.2468 | |
| |
A1 | | | $0.3498 | |
| |
R6 | | | $0.3629 | |
| |
Advisor | | | $0.3598 | |
| |
Total Annual Operating Expenses11
| | | | |
Share Class | | | |
| |
A | | | 0.90% | |
| |
Advisor | | | 0.65% | |
| |
Each class of shares is available to certain eligible investors and has different annual fees and expenses, as described in the prospectus.
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. Because municipal bonds are sensitive to interest-rate movements, the Fund’s yield and share price will fluctuate with market conditions. Bond prices generally move in the opposite direction of interest rates. Thus, as prices of bonds in the Fund adjust to a rise in interest rates, the Fund’s share price may decline. Because the Fund invests principally in a single state, it is subject to greater risk of adverse economic and regulatory changes in that state than a geographically diversified fund. Puerto Rico municipal bonds have been impacted by recent adverse economic and market changes, which may cause the Fund’s share price to decline. Changes in the credit rating of a bond, or in the credit rating or financial strength of a bond’s issuer, insurer or guarantor, may affect the bond’s value. The Fund may invest a significant part of its assets in municipal securities that finance similar types of projects, such as utilities, hospitals, higher education and transportation. A change that affects one project would likely affect all similar projects, thereby increasing market risk. The Fund is actively managed but there is no guarantee that the manager’s investment decisions will produce the desired results. The Fund’s prospectus also includes a description of the main investment risks.
1. Cumulative total return represents the change in value of an investment over the periods indicated.
2. Average annual total return represents the average annual change in value of an investment over the periods indicated. Return for less than one year, if any, has not been annualized.
3. Effective 9/10/18, Class A shares closed to new investors, were renamed Class A1 shares, and a new Class A share with a different expense structure became available. Class A performance shown has been calculated as follows: (a) for periods prior to 9/10/18, a restated figure is used based on the Fund’s Class A1 performance that includes any Rule12b-1 rate differential that exists between Class A1 and Class A; and (b) for periods after 9/10/18, actual Class A performance is used, reflecting all charges and fees applicable to that class.
4. Prior to 3/1/19, these shares were offered at a higher initial sales charge of 4.25%, thus actual returns (with sales charges) would have differed. Average annual total returns (with sales charges) have been restated to reflect the current maximum initial sales charge of 3.75%.
5. Effective 9/15/16, the Fund began offering Advisor class shares, which do not have sales charges or a Rule12b-1 plan. Performance quotations for this class reflect the following methods of calculation: (a) For periods prior to 9/15/16, a restated figure is used based upon the Fund’s Class A performance, excluding the effect of Class A’s maximum initial sales charge, but reflecting the effect of the Class A Rule12b-1 fees; and (b) for periods after 9/15/16, actual Advisor class performance is used reflecting all charges and fees applicable to that class. Since 9/15/16 (commencement of sales), the cumulative and average annual total returns of Advisor Class shares were +4.41% and +1.61%.
6. Distribution rate is based on an annualization of the respective class’s May dividend and the maximum offering price (NAV for Advisor Class) per share on 5/31/19.
7. Taxable equivalent distribution rate and yield assume the published rates as of 12/18/18 for the maximum combined effective federal and Tennessee state personal income tax rate of 42.80%, based on the federal income tax rate of 37.00% plus 3.80% Medicare tax.
8. The Fund’s30-day standardized yield is calculated over a trailing30-day period using the yield to maturity on bonds and/or the dividends accrued on stocks. It may not equal the Fund’s actual income distribution rate, which reflects the Fund’s past dividends paid to shareholders.
9. Source: Morningstar. The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is a market valueweighted index engineered for the long-termtax-exempt bond market. To be included in the index, bonds must be fixed rate, have at least one year to final maturity and be rated investment grade(Baa3/BBB- or higher) by at least two of the following agencies: Moody’s, S&P and Fitch.
10. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, bls.gov/cpi. The Consumer Price Index is a commonly used measure of the inflation rate.
11. Figures are as stated in the Fund’s current prospectus and may differ from the expense ratios disclosed in the Your Fund’s Expenses and Financial Highlights sections in this report. In periods of market volatility, assets may decline significantly, causing total annual Fund operating expenses to become higher than the figures shown.
See www.franklintempletondatasources.com for additional data provider information.
| | | | |
| | |
16 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN TENNESSEE MUNICIPAL BOND FUND
Your Fund’s Expenses
As a Fund shareholder, you can incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on Fund purchases and redemptions; and (2) ongoing Fund costs, including management fees, distribution and service(12b-1) fees, and other Fund expenses. All mutual funds have ongoing costs, sometimes referred to as operating expenses. The table below shows ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and can help you understand these costs and compare them with those of other mutual funds. The table assumes a $1,000 investment held for the six months indicated.
Actual Fund Expenses
The table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses in the columns under the heading “Actual.” In these columns the Fund’s actual return, which includes the effect of Fund expenses, is used to calculate the “Ending Account Value” for each class of shares. You can estimate the expenses you paid during the period by following these steps (ofcourse, your account value and expenses will differ from those in this illustration):Divide your account value by $1,000 (ifyour account had an $8,600 value, then $8,600÷ $1,000 = 8.6). Then multiply the result by the number in the row for your class of shares under the headings “Actual” and “Expenses Paid During Period” (ifActual Expenses Paid During Period were $7.50, then 8.6 x $7.50 = $64.50). In this illustration, the actual expenses paid this period are $64.50.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison with Other Funds
Under the heading “Hypothetical” in the table, information is provided about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. This information may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period, but it can help you compare ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with those of other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example for the class of shares you hold with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Please note that expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight ongoing costs and do not reflect any transactional costs. Therefore, information under the heading “Hypothetical” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you compare total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if transactional costs were included, your total costs would have been higher.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Actual (actual return after expenses) | | | | Hypothetical (5% annual return before expenses) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Share Class | | Beginning Account Value 12/1/18 | | | | Ending Account Value 5/31/19 | | Expenses Paid During Period 12/1/18–5/31/191, 2 | | | | Ending Account Value 5/31/19 | | Expenses Paid During Period 12/1/18–5/31/191, 2 | | | | Net Annualized Expense Ratio2 |
| | | | | | | | | |
A | | $1,000 | | | | $1,047.00 | | $4.80 | | | | $1,020.24 | | $4.73 | | | | 0.94% |
A1 | | $1,000 | | | | $1,047.90 | | $4.03 | | | | $1,020.99 | | $3.98 | | | | 0.79% |
R6 | | $1,000 | | | | $1,049.40 | | $3.37 | | | | $1,021.64 | | $3.33 | | | | 0.66% |
Advisor | | $1,000 | | | | $1,048.30 | | $3.52 | | | | $1,021.49 | | $3.48 | | | | 0.69% |
1. Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio for thesix-month period as indicated above—in the far right column—multiplied by the simple average account value over the period indicated, and then multiplied by 182/365 to reflect theone-half year period.
2. Reflects expenses after fee waivers and expense reimbursements, for Class R6.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 17 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
Financial Highlights
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund
| | | | |
| | Year Ended May 31, 2019a | |
| |
| |
Class A | | | | |
| |
Per share operating performance (for a share outstanding throughout the year) | | | | |
| |
Net asset value, beginning of year | | | $10.70 | |
| | | | |
| |
Income from investment operationsb: | | | | |
| |
Net investment incomec | | | 0.27 | |
| |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) | | | 0.41 | |
| | | | |
| |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.68 | |
| | | | |
| |
Less distributions from: | | | | |
| |
Net investment income | | | (0.28) | |
| | | | |
| |
Net asset value, end of year | | | $11.10 | |
| | | | |
| |
Total returnd | | | 6.56% | |
| |
Ratios to average net assetse | | | | |
| |
Expensesf | | | 0.83% | |
| |
Net investment income | | | 3.55% | |
| |
Supplemental data | | | | |
| |
Net assets, end of year (000’s) | | | $244,196 | |
| |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 13.91% | |
aFor the period September 10, 2018 (effective date) to May 31, 2019.
bThe amount shown for a share outstanding throughout the period may not correlate with the Statement of Operations for the period due to the timing of sales and repurchases of the Fund’s shares in relation to income earned and/or fluctuating fair value of the investments of the Fund.
cBased on average daily shares outstanding.
dTotal return does not reflect sales commissions or contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable, and is not annualized for periods less than one year.
eRatios are annualized for periods less than one year.
fBenefit of expense reduction rounds to less than 0.01%.
| | | | |
| | |
18 | | Annual Report | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended May 31, | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | 2019 | | | 2018 | | | 2017 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
| |
| | | | | |
Class A1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Per share operating performance (for a share outstanding throughout the year) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of year | | | $10.70 | | | | $10.89 | | | | $11.10 | | | | $10.65 | | | | $10.42 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Income from investment operationsa: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net investment incomeb | | | 0.40 | | | | 0.39 | | | | 0.40 | | | | 0.41 | | | | 0.44 | |
| | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) | | | 0.39 | | | | (0.19 | ) | | | (0.22 | ) | | | 0.46 | | | | 0.24 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.79 | | | | 0.20 | | | | 0.18 | | | | 0.87 | | | | 0.68 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net investment income | | | (0.41 | ) | | | (0.39 | ) | | | (0.39 | ) | | | (0.42 | ) | | | (0.45) | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Net asset value, end of year | | | $11.08 | | | | $10.70 | | | | $10.89 | | | | $11.10 | | | | $10.65 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Total returnc | | | 7.56% | | | | 1.92% | | | | 1.71% | | | | 8.37% | | | | 6.63% | |
| | | | | |
Ratios to average net assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Expenses | | | 0.68% | d | | | 0.66% | | | | 0.63% | | | | 0.65% | | | | 0.63% | |
| | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.70% | | | | 3.63% | | | | 3.66% | | | | 3.83% | | | | 4.17% | |
| | | | | |
Supplemental data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s) | | | $1,386,291 | | | | $1,378,169 | | | | $1,377,514 | | | | $1,442,703 | | | | $1,294,192 | |
| | | | | |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 13.91% | | | | 11.08% | | | | 19.73% | | | | 12.23% | | | | 11.98% | |
aThe amount shown for a share outstanding throughout the period may not correlate with the Statement of Operations for the period due to the timing of sales and repurchases of the Fund’s shares in relation to income earned and/or fluctuating fair value of the investments of the Fund.
bBased on average daily shares outstanding.
cTotal return does not reflect sales commissions or contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable.
dBenefit of expense reduction rounds to less than 0.01%.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | Annual Report | | | 19 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | Year Ended May 31, | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | 2019 | | | 2018 | | | 2017 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
| |
| | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Per share operating performance (for a share outstanding throughout the year) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of year | | | $10.78 | | | | $10.97 | | | | $11.17 | | | | $10.72 | | | | $10.49 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Income from investment operationsa: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net investment incomeb | | | 0.34 | | | | 0.33 | | | | 0.34 | | | | 0.36 | | | | 0.39 | |
| | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) | | | 0.40 | | | | (0.19) | | | | (0.21) | | | | 0.45 | | | | 0.23 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.74 | | | | 0.14 | | | | 0.13 | | | | 0.81 | | | | 0.62 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net investment income | | | (0.35) | | | | (0.33) | | | | (0.33) | | | | (0.36) | | | | (0.39) | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Net asset value, end of year | | | $11.17 | | | | $10.78 | | | | $10.97 | | | | $11.17 | | | | $10.72 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Total returnc | | | 7.01% | | | | 1.34% | | | | 1.22% | | | | 7.73% | | | | 6.01% | |
| | | | | |
Ratios to average net assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Expenses | | | 1.23%d | | | | 1.21% | | | | 1.18% | | | | 1.20% | | | | 1.18% | |
| | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.15% | | | | 3.08% | | | | 3.11% | | | | 3.28% | | | | 3.62% | |
| | | | | |
Supplemental data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s) | | | $272,186 | | | | $327,022 | | | | $358,308 | | | | $377,550 | | | | $326,456 | |
| | | | | |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 13.91% | | | | 11.08% | | | | 19.73% | | | | 12.23% | | | | 11.98% | |
aThe amount shown for a share outstanding throughout the period may not correlate with the Statement of Operations for the period due to the timing of sales and repurchases of the Fund’s shares in relation to income earned and/or fluctuating fair value of the investments of the Fund.
bBased on average daily shares outstanding.
cTotal return does not reflect sales commissions or contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable.
dBenefit of expense reduction rounds to less than 0.01%.
| | | | |
| | |
20 | | Annual Report | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | |
| |
| | Year Ended May 31, | |
| | | | |
| | |
| | 2019 | | | 2018a | |
| |
| | |
Class R6 | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Per share operating performance (for a share outstanding throughout the year) | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net asset value, beginning of year | | | $10.74 | | | | $10.88 | |
| | | | |
| | |
Income from investment operationsb: | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net investment incomec | | | 0.41 | | | | 0.35 | |
| | |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) | | | 0.39 | | | | (0.15) | |
| | | | |
| | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.80 | | | | 0.20 | |
| | | | |
| | |
Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net investment income | | | (0.42) | | | | (0.34) | |
| | | | |
| | |
Net asset value, end of year | | | $11.12 | | | | $10.74 | |
| | | | |
| | |
Total returnd | | | 7.66% | | | | 1.84% | |
| | |
Ratios to average net assetse | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Expenses before waiver and payments by affiliates | | | 0.57% | | | | 0.55% | |
| | |
Expenses net of waiver and payments by affiliates | | | 0.55%f | | | | 0.53% | |
| | |
Net investment income | | | 3.83% | | | | 3.76% | |
| | |
Supplemental data | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s) | | | $21,214 | | | | $13,004 | |
| | |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 13.91% | | | | 11.08% | |
aFor the period August 1, 2017 (effective date) to May 31, 2018.
bThe amount shown for a share outstanding throughout the period may not correlate with the Statement of Operations for the period due to the timing of sales and repurchases of the Fund’s shares in relation to income earned and/or fluctuating fair value of the investments of the Fund.
cBased on average daily shares outstanding.
dTotal return is not annualized for periods less than one year.
eRatios are annualized for periods less than one year.
fBenefit of expense reduction rounds to less than 0.01%.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | Annual Report | | | 21 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | Year Ended May 31, | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | 2019 | | | 2018 | | | 2017 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
| |
| | | | | |
Advisor Class | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Per share operating performance (for a share outstanding throughout the year) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of year | | | $10.73 | | | | $10.91 | | | | $11.12 | | | | $10.67 | | | | $10.44 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Income from investment operationsa: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net investment incomeb | | | 0.41 | | | | 0.40 | | | | 0.41 | | | | 0.43 | | | | 0.45 | |
| | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) | | | 0.39 | | | | (0.18) | | | | (0.22) | | | | 0.45 | | | | 0.24 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.80 | | | | 0.22 | | | | 0.19 | | | | 0.88 | | | | 0.69 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net investment income | | | (0.42) | | | | (0.40) | | | | (0.40) | | | | (0.43) | | | | (0.46) | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Net asset value, end of year | | | $11.11 | | | | $10.73 | | | | $10.91 | | | | $11.12 | | | | $10.67 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Total return | | | 7.64% | | | | 2.10% | | | | 1.80% | | | | 8.46% | | | | 6.73% | |
| | | | | |
Ratios to average net assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Expenses | | | 0.58%c | | | | 0.56% | | | | 0.53% | | | | 0.55% | | | | 0.53% | |
| | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.80% | | | | 3.73% | | | | 3.76% | | | | 3.93% | | | | 4.27% | |
| | | | | |
Supplemental data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s) | | | $889,990 | | | | $748,355 | | | | $720,890 | | | | $635,463 | | | | $474,392 | |
| | | | | |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 13.91% | | | | 11.08% | | | | 19.73% | | | | 12.23% | | | | 11.98% | |
aThe amount shown for a share outstanding throughout the period may not correlate with the Statement of Operations for the period due to the timing of sales and repurchases of the Fund’s shares in relation to income earned and/or fluctuating fair value of the investments of the Fund.
bBased on average daily shares outstanding.
cBenefit of expense reduction rounds to less than 0.01%.
| | | | |
| | |
22 | | Annual Report | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
Statement of Investments, May 31, 2019
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds 93.4% | | | | | | | | |
| | California 89.9% | | | | | | | | |
| | ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corporations Revenue, Episcopal Senior Communities, Refunding, 6.125%, 7/01/41 | | $ | 7,500,000 | | | $ | 8,091,450 | |
| | Alameda Special Tax, CFDNo. 13-1, Alameda Landing Public Improvements, 5.00%, 9/01/46 | | | 1,400,000 | | | | 1,554,434 | |
| | Artesia RDA Tax Allocation, | | | | | | | | |
| | Artesia Redevelopment Project Area, 5.50%, 6/01/42 | | | 6,355,000 | | | | 6,360,338 | |
| | Artesia Redevelopment Project Area, 5.70%, 6/01/42 | | | 2,815,000 | | | | 2,817,871 | |
| | HousingSet-Aside, Artesia Redevelopment Project Area, 7.70%, 6/01/46 | | | 3,150,000 | | | | 3,160,962 | |
| | Azusa Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2005-1, Rosedale, Improvement Area No. 1, 5.00%, 9/01/27 | | | 1,925,000 | | | | 1,937,455 | |
| | CFDNo. 2005-1, Rosedale, Improvement Area No. 1, 5.00%, 9/01/37 | | | 1,580,000 | | | | 1,588,895 | |
| | Baldwin Park USD, GO, Los Angeles County, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2006, Refunding, BAM Insured, zero cpn., 8/01/42 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 2,538,300 | |
| | Bay Area Toll Authority Toll Bridge Revenue, San Francisco Bay Area, Subordinate, SeriesS-4, Pre- Refunded, 5.25%, 4/01/53 | | | 15,000,000 | | | | 17,258,250 | |
| | Beaumont Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2016-1, Fairway Canyon, 5.00%, 9/01/44 | | | 300,000 | | | | 341,382 | |
| | CFDNo. 2016-1, Fairway Canyon, 5.00%, 9/01/49 | | | 400,000 | | | | 453,636 | |
| | Beaumont USD, GO, Riverside County, Election of 2008, Series C, AGMC Insured,Pre-Refunded, 6.00%, 8/01/41 | | | 1,925,000 | | | | 2,122,563 | |
| | Buena Park Community RDA Tax Allocation, Consolidated Redevelopment Project, Series A, 6.25%, 9/01/35 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,018,100 | |
| | California Community Housing Agency Workforce Housing Revenue, Annadel Apartments, Series A, 5.00%, 4/01/49 | | | 25,500,000 | | | | 27,813,360 | |
| | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency Tobacco Settlement Revenue, Asset-Backed, Los | | | | | | | | |
| | Angeles County Securitization Corp., 5.70%, 6/01/46 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,019,410 | |
| | California Health Facilities Financing Authority Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Adventist Health System/West, Refunding, Series A, 4.00%, 3/01/39 | | | 9,000,000 | | | | 9,543,510 | |
| | California-Nevada Methodist Homes, Refunding, California Mortgage Insured, 5.00%, 7/01/45 | | | 4,500,000 | | | | 5,146,830 | |
| | Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Refunding, Series A, 4.00%, 8/15/49 | | | 3,375,000 | | | | 3,592,890 | |
| | El Camino Hospital, 4.00%, 2/01/42 | | | 6,500,000 | | | | 6,920,680 | |
| | El Camino Hospital, 5.00%, 2/01/42 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,814,800 | |
| | Kaiser Permanente, Refunding, Series A, SubseriesA-2, 4.00%, 11/01/38 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,528,650 | |
| | Kaiser Permanente, Series A, SubseriesA-2, 4.00%, 11/01/51 | | | 25,000,000 | | | | 27,031,500 | |
| | Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Series A, 5.00%, 8/15/43 | | | 7,160,000 | | | | 8,059,511 | |
| | Sutter Health, Refunding, Series B, 5.00%, 11/15/46 | | | 26,925,000 | | | | 31,378,395 | |
| | California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank Revenue, Goodwill Industries of Sacramento Valley and Northern Nevada Project, Series A, 5.00%, 1/01/47 | | | 10,360,000 | | | | 10,059,249 | |
| | California Municipal Finance Authority Education Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | American Heritage Education Foundation Project, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/36 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,134,040 | |
| | American Heritage Education Foundation Project, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/46 | | | 1,750,000 | | | | 1,956,395 | |
| | California Municipal Finance Authority Mobile Home Park Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Caritas Affordable Housing Inc. Projects, Senior, Series A, 5.00%, 8/15/30 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,130,990 | |
| | Caritas Affordable Housing Inc. Projects, Senior, Series A, 5.25%, 8/15/39 | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,350,504 | |
| | Caritas Affordable Housing Inc. Projects, Senior, Series A, 5.25%, 8/15/49 | | | 3,500,000 | | | | 3,890,460 | |
| | Windsor Mobile Country Club, Refunding, Series A, 4.00%, 11/15/48 | | | 800,000 | | | | 838,568 | |
| | Windsor Mobile Country Club, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 5.625%, 11/15/33 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,185,340 | |
| | Windsor Mobile Country Club, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 6.00%, 11/15/48 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,805,920 | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 23 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California PFAR, | | | | | | | | |
| | Henry Mayo Newhall Hospital, Refunding, 5.00%, 10/15/37 | | $ | 1,100,000 | | | $ | 1,236,884 | |
| | Henry Mayo Newhall Hospital, Refunding, 5.00%, 10/15/47 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,543,900 | |
| | University Housing, NCCD Claremont Properties LLC, Claremont Colleges Project, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/27 | | | 1,125,000 | | | | 1,191,589 | |
| | University Housing, NCCD Claremont Properties LLC, Claremont Colleges Project, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/32 | | | 825,000 | | | | 872,091 | |
| | University Housing, NCCD Claremont Properties LLC, Claremont Colleges Project, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/37 | | | 1,325,000 | | | | 1,378,490 | |
| | University Housing, NCCD Claremont Properties LLC, Claremont Colleges Project, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/47 | | | 4,915,000 | | | | 5,039,497 | |
| | California School Finance Authority Charter School Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Aspire Public Schools-Obligated Group, Refunding, 5.00%, 8/01/46 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,760,925 | |
| | Aspire Public Schools-Obligated Group, Refunding, Series B, 5.00%, 8/01/35 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,117,560 | |
| | Aspire Public Schools-Obligated Group, Refunding, Series B, 5.00%, 8/01/45 | | | 1,100,000 | | | | 1,214,972 | |
| | Classical Academies Project, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 10/01/37 | | | 1,485,000 | | | | 1,653,666 | |
| | Classical Academies Project, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 10/01/44 | | | 5,610,000 | | | | 6,161,743 | |
| | Ednovate-Obligated Group, 5.00%, 6/01/48 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,060,800 | |
| | Ednovate-Obligated Group, 5.00%, 6/01/56 | | | 1,710,000 | | | | 1,802,049 | |
| | Larchmont Charter School Project, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/55 | | | 2,050,000 | | | | 2,174,640 | |
| | Rocketship Education-Obligated Group, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/34 | | | 750,000 | | | | 796,740 | |
| | Rocketship Education-Obligated Group, Series A, 5.125%, 6/01/47 | | | 845,000 | | | | 893,503 | |
| | Rocketship Education-Obligated Group, Series A, 5.25%, 6/01/52 | | | 980,000 | | | | 1,037,526 | |
| | Rocketship Public Schools-Obligated Group, Series G, 5.00%, 6/01/30 | | | 315,000 | | | | 340,616 | |
| | Rocketship Public Schools-Obligated Group, Series G, 5.00%, 6/01/37 | | | 360,000 | | | | 383,152 | |
| | Rocketship Public Schools-Obligated Group, Series G, 5.00%, 6/01/47 | | | 1,720,000 | | | | 1,816,182 | |
| | Summit Public Schools-Obligated Group, 5.00%, 6/01/47 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,700,370 | |
| | California School Finance Authority Educational Facility Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | River Springs Charter School, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/30 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,239,240 | |
| | River Springs Charter School, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/37 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,196,100 | |
| | River Springs Charter School, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/47 | | | 1,975,000 | | | | 2,149,886 | |
| | River Springs Charter School, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/52 | | | 1,340,000 | | | | 1,448,942 | |
| | California School Finance Authority School Facility Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Alliance for College-Ready Public Schools Projects, Series C, 5.00%, 7/01/46 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 11,149,900 | |
| | Green Dot Public Schools California Projects, Series A, 5.00%, 8/01/35 | | | 2,525,000 | | | | 2,840,171 | |
| | Green Dot Public Schools California Projects, Series A, 5.00%, 8/01/38 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,165,180 | |
| | Green Dot Public Schools California Projects, Series A, 5.00%, 8/01/45 | | | 3,500,000 | | | | 3,874,150 | |
| | Green Dot Public Schools California Projects, Series A, 5.00%, 8/01/48 | | | 1,750,000 | | | | 2,012,028 | |
| | Kipp LA Projects, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/35 | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,355,760 | |
| | Kipp LA Projects, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/45 | | | 1,675,000 | | | | 1,863,538 | |
| | Kipp LA Projects, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/47 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,716,135 | |
| | aKipp Social Projects, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/39 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,188,340 | |
| | aKipp Social Projects, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/49 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,172,130 | |
| | aKipp Social Projects, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/54 | | | 2,150,000 | | | | 2,499,827 | |
| | California State Community College Financing Authority College Housing Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | NCCD - Orange Coast Properties LLC - Orange Coast College Project, 5.25%, 5/01/43 | | | 3,200,000 | | | | 3,702,144 | |
| | NCCD - Orange Coast Properties LLC - Orange Coast College Project, 5.25%, 5/01/48 | | | 4,500,000 | | | | 5,183,145 | |
| | | | |
| | |
24 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California State Educational Facilities Authority Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Art Center College of Design, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 12/01/44 | | $ | 5,000,000 | | | $ | 5,900,250 | |
| | Art Center College of Design, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 12/01/48 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,878,900 | |
| | Chapman University, 5.00%, 4/01/40 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,720,900 | |
| | Loma Linda University, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 4/01/42 | | | 8,500,000 | | | | 9,871,135 | |
| | Stanford University, SeriesV-1, 5.00%, 5/01/49 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 14,757,200 | |
| | University of the Pacific, Refunding, 5.00%, 11/01/36 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,500,310 | |
| | University of San Francisco,Pre-Refunded, 6.125%, 10/01/36 | | | 980,000 | | | | 1,088,643 | |
| | University of San Francisco, Refunding, 6.125%, 10/01/36 | | | 1,020,000 | | | | 1,134,322 | |
| | California State GO, | | | | | | | | |
| | Various Purpose, 6.00%, 11/01/39 | | | 13,000,000 | | | | 13,246,220 | |
| | Various Purpose, FGIC Insured, 6.00%, 8/01/19 | | | 10,000 | | | | 10,076 | |
| | Various Purpose, Refunding, 5.00%, 3/01/45 | | | 3,900,000 | | | | 4,502,628 | |
| | California State Municipal Finance Authority Charter School Lease Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Santa Rosa Academy Project, 5.125%, 7/01/35 | | | 450,000 | | | | 490,464 | |
| | Santa Rosa Academy Project, 5.375%, 7/01/45 | | | 1,400,000 | | | | 1,528,884 | |
| | California State Municipal Finance Authority Charter School Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | King/Chavez Academy of Excellence Project, Refunding and Improvement, Series A, 5.00%, 5/01/36 | | | 2,675,000 | | | | 2,919,254 | |
| | King/Chavez Academy of Excellence Project, Refunding and Improvement, Series A, 5.00%, 5/01/46 | | | 2,775,000 | | | | 2,982,542 | |
| | The Palmdale Aerospace Academy Project, Series A, 3.875%, 7/01/28 | | | 1,400,000 | | | | 1,463,952 | |
| | The Palmdale Aerospace Academy Project, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/31 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,118,500 | |
| | The Palmdale Aerospace Academy Project, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/36 | | | 2,750,000 | | | | 3,030,005 | |
| | The Palmdale Aerospace Academy Project, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/38 | | | 1,100,000 | | | | 1,232,044 | |
| | The Palmdale Aerospace Academy Project, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/41 | | | 1,750,000 | | | | 1,908,620 | |
| | The Palmdale Aerospace Academy Project, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/46 | | | 1,670,000 | | | | 1,813,754 | |
| | The Palmdale Aerospace Academy Project, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/49 | | | 1,800,000 | | | | 1,987,704 | |
| | California State Municipal Finance Authority Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Biola University, Refunding, 5.00%, 10/01/36 | | | 1,100,000 | | | | 1,299,903 | |
| | Biola University, Refunding, 5.00%, 10/01/39 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,171,900 | |
| | California Baptist University, Series A, 5.00%, 11/01/36 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,858,425 | |
| | California Baptist University, Series A, 5.375%, 11/01/40 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,731,400 | |
| | California Baptist University, Series A, 5.50%, 11/01/45 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 11,478,800 | |
| | Community Medical Centers, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 2/01/40 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,629,650 | |
| | Community Medical Centers, Refunding, Series A, 4.00%, 2/01/42 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 10,542,300 | |
| | The Creative Center of Los Altos Project Pinewood and Oakwood School, Refunding, Series B, 4.00%, 11/01/36 | | | 1,395,000 | | | | 1,422,774 | |
| | The Creative Center of Los Altos Project Pinewood and Oakwood School, Refunding, Series B, 4.50%, 11/01/46 | | | 1,600,000 | | | | 1,654,960 | |
| | Eisenhower Medical Center, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/37 | | | 2,625,000 | | | | 3,030,195 | |
| | Harbor Regional Center Project,Pre-Refunded, 8.50%, 11/01/39 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,144,350 | |
| | Harbor Regional Center Project, Refunding, 5.00%, 11/01/32 | | | 3,020,000 | | | | 3,522,377 | |
| | Harbor Regional Center Project, Refunding, 5.00%, 11/01/39 | | | 6,525,000 | | | | 7,441,958 | |
| | Inland Regional Center Project, Refunding, 5.00%, 6/15/37 | | | 9,965,000 | | | | 11,360,499 | |
| | Kern Regional Center Project, Series A, 7.50%, 5/01/39 | | | 9,000,000 | | | | 9,035,190 | |
| | LINXS APM Project, senior lien, Series A, 4.00%, 12/31/47 | | | 20,000,000 | | | | 21,161,000 | |
| | NorthBay Healthcare Group, 5.00%, 11/01/35 | | | 1,100,000 | | | | 1,211,276 | |
| | NorthBay Healthcare Group, 5.00%, 11/01/44 | | | 1,050,000 | | | | 1,143,503 | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 25 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California State Municipal Finance Authority Revenue, (continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | NorthBay Healthcare Group, Series A, 5.25%, 11/01/47 | | $ | 3,000,000 | | | $ | 3,343,500 | |
| | South Central Los Angeles Regional Center Project, 5.50%, 12/01/33 | | | 3,115,000 | | | | 3,537,830 | |
| | South Central Los Angeles Regional Center Project, 5.75%, 12/01/43 | | | 7,000,000 | | | | 7,962,360 | |
| | aTown and Country Manor, Refunding, California Mortgage Insured, 5.00%, 7/01/39 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,227,930 | |
| | aTown and Country Manor, Refunding, California Mortgage Insured, 5.00%, 7/01/49 | | | 2,650,000 | | | | 3,206,659 | |
| | University of La Verne, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/43 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,852,650 | |
| | California State Municipal Finance Authority Student Housing Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Bowles Hall Foundation, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/35 | | | 600,000 | | | | 667,794 | |
| | Bowles Hall Foundation, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/50 | | | 3,250,000 | | | | 3,553,680 | |
| | CHF-Davis I LLC - West Village Student Housing Project, 5.00%, 5/15/48 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,847,750 | |
| | CHF-Riverside I LLC - UCR Dundee-Glasgow Student Housing Project, 5.00%, 5/15/43 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,758,570 | |
| | California State PCFA Solid Waste Disposal Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | CalPlant I Project, Green Bonds, 7.00%, 7/01/22 | | | 3,500,000 | | | | 3,620,785 | |
| | CalPlant I Project, Green Bonds, 7.50%, 7/01/32 | | | 13,000,000 | | | | 13,677,430 | |
| | CalPlant I Project, Green Bonds, 8.00%, 7/01/39 | | | 6,500,000 | | | | 7,155,980 | |
| | California State Public Works Board Lease Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California State Prison Los Angeles, Various Buildings, Series C, 5.75%, 10/01/31 | | | 4,640,000 | | | | 5,085,162 | |
| | Various Capital Projects, Series A, 5.125%, 10/01/31 | | | 3,605,000 | | | | 3,899,601 | |
| | California State University Revenue, Systemwide, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 11/01/47 | | | 14,980,000 | | | | 17,345,342 | |
| | California Statewide CDA Hospital Revenue, Methodist Hospital of Southern California, Refunding, 5.00%, 1/01/48 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,769,200 | |
| | California Statewide CDA College Housing Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | NCCD-Hooper StreetLLC-California College of the Arts Project, 5.25%, 7/01/39 | | | 2,550,000 | | | | 2,935,432 | |
| | NCCD-Hooper StreetLLC-California College of the Arts Project, 5.25%, 7/01/49 | | | 3,375,000 | | | | 3,829,781 | |
| | NCCD-Hooper StreetLLC-California College of the Arts Project, 5.25%, 7/01/52 | | | 1,450,000 | | | | 1,632,352 | |
| | California Statewide CDA Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Aldersly, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 5/15/32 | | | 750,000 | | | | 842,273 | |
| | Aldersly, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 5/15/40 | | | 1,010,000 | | | | 1,125,595 | |
| | American Baptist Homes of the West, Refunding, 6.25%, 10/01/39 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,076,350 | |
| | Bentley School, Refunding, Series A, 7.00%, 7/01/40 | | | 8,675,000 | | | | 9,154,120 | |
| | California Baptist University, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 11/01/32 | | | 1,135,000 | | | | 1,331,094 | |
| | California Baptist University, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 11/01/41 | | | 1,875,000 | | | | 2,147,306 | |
| | California Baptist University, Series A, 5.125%, 11/01/23 | | | 715,000 | | | | 763,470 | |
| | California Baptist University, Series A, 6.125%, 11/01/33 | | | 1,565,000 | | | | 1,818,107 | |
| | California Baptist University, Series A, 6.375%, 11/01/43 | | | 4,035,000 | | | | 4,674,547 | |
| | California Baptist University, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 7.25%, 11/01/31 | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,425,125 | |
| | California Baptist University, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 7.50%, 11/01/41 | | | 2,750,000 | | | | 3,151,500 | |
| | Catholic Healthcare West, Series C, 5.625%, 7/01/35 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,013,900 | |
| | Covenant Retirement Communities Inc., Series C, 5.625%, 12/01/36 | | | 8,000,000 | | | | 9,169,600 | |
| | Enloe Medical Center, Refunding, California Mortgage Insured, 5.00%, 8/15/38 | | | 6,000,000 | | | | 6,985,680 | |
| | Eskaton Properties Inc. Obligated Group, Refunding, 5.25%, 11/15/34 | | | 4,350,000 | | | | 4,711,398 | |
| | Huntington Memorial Hospital, 5.00%, 7/01/43 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,181,210 | |
| | Huntington Memorial Hospital, 4.00%, 7/01/48 | | | 6,000,000 | | | | 6,334,560 | |
| | Huntington Memorial Hospital, Refunding, Series B, 5.00%, 7/01/44 | | | 4,450,000 | | | | 4,976,969 | |
| | | | |
| | |
26 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California Statewide CDA Revenue, (continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Insured Senior Living Health Facility, Los Angeles Jewish Home for the Aging, Fountainview at Gonda, Series A, California Mortgage Insured, 5.00%, 8/01/44 | | $ | 2,450,000 | | | $ | 2,736,405 | |
| | Lancer Educational Student Housing Project, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/34 | | | 375,000 | | | | 433,376 | |
| | Lancer Educational Student Housing Project, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/46 | | | 10,735,000 | | | | 11,732,926 | |
| | Lancer Educational Student Housing Project, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/39 | | | 475,000 | | | | 540,655 | |
| | Lancer Educational Student Housing Project, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/51 | | | 1,450,000 | | | | 1,629,452 | |
| | Loma Linda University Medical Center, Refunding, Series A, 5.25%, 12/01/44 | | | 8,550,000 | | | | 9,428,940 | |
| | Loma Linda University Medical Center, Series A, 5.00%, 12/01/36 | | | 9,255,000 | | | | 10,334,503 | |
| | Loma Linda University Medical Center, Series A, 5.00%, 12/01/41 | | | 1,245,000 | | | | 1,380,083 | |
| | Loma Linda University Medical Center, Series A, 5.25%, 12/01/56 | | | 6,500,000 | | | | 7,249,385 | |
| | Loma Linda University Medical Center, Series A, 5.50%, 12/01/58 | | | 27,660,000 | | | | 32,024,471 | |
| | Marin General Hospital, Green Bonds, Series A, 4.00%, 8/01/45 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,551,015 | |
| | Methodist Hospital of Southern California Project, FHA Insured,Pre-Refunded, 6.75%, 2/01/38 | | | 8,980,000 | | | | 9,056,779 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Emerson Ranch Project, 5.00%, 9/02/35 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,255,380 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Emerson Ranch Project, 5.00%, 9/02/45 | | | 3,810,000 | | | | 4,246,474 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Pacific Highlands Ranch, 5.00%, 9/02/39 | | | 700,000 | | | | 831,495 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Pacific Highlands Ranch, 5.00%, 9/02/49 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,172,340 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Refunding, Series R1, 5.00%, 9/02/40 | | | 2,350,000 | | | | 2,502,633 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series A, 4.00%, 9/02/27 | | | 2,205,000 | | | | 2,267,335 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series A, 5.00%, 9/02/36 | | | 1,035,000 | | | | 1,130,075 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series A, 5.00%, 9/02/37 | | | 1,975,000 | | | | 2,150,044 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series A, 5.00%, 9/02/38 | | | 2,150,000 | | | | 2,458,332 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series A, 5.00%, 9/02/39 | | | 1,700,000 | | | | 1,958,978 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series A, 5.00%, 9/02/44 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,141,100 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series A, 5.00%, 9/02/45 | | | 2,255,000 | | | | 2,439,685 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series A, 5.00%, 9/02/46 | | | 2,460,000 | | | | 2,654,463 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series A, 5.00%, 9/02/47 | | | 3,750,000 | | | | 4,229,287 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series A, 5.00%, 9/02/48 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,137,380 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series B, 5.00%, 9/02/37 | | | 3,480,000 | | | | 3,893,146 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series B, 5.00%, 9/02/38 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,430,470 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series B, 5.00%, 9/02/43 | | | 5,095,000 | | | | 5,767,846 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series B, 5.00%, 9/02/47 | | | 2,710,000 | | | | 2,982,490 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series B, 5.00%, 9/02/48 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,636,000 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series C, 5.00%, 9/02/37 | | | 5,135,000 | | | | 5,744,627 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series C, 5.00%, 9/02/38 | | | 6,000,000 | | | | 6,860,940 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series C, 5.00%, 9/02/47 | | | 1,785,000 | | | | 1,984,670 | |
| | Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, Series C, 5.00%, 9/02/48 | | | 6,605,000 | | | | 7,445,156 | |
| | California Statewide CDA Special Tax Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2015-01, Improvement Area No. 1, University District, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/36 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,125,140 | |
| | CFDNo. 2015-01, Improvement Area No. 1, University District, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/45 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,669,995 | |
| | CFDNo. 2015-01, Improvement Area No. 2, University District, 5.00%, 9/01/27 | | | 900,000 | | | | 1,015,002 | |
| | CFDNo. 2015-01, Improvement Area No. 2, University District, 5.00%, 9/01/37 | | | 1,225,000 | | | | 1,421,196 | |
| | CFDNo. 2015-01, Improvement Area No. 2, University District, 5.00%, 9/01/47 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,288,060 | |
| | CFDNo. 2016-02, Delta Coves, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/46 | | | 11,125,000 | | | | 11,443,954 | |
| | CFDNo. 2018-03, Uptown Newport, 5.00%, 9/01/39 | | | 1,750,000 | | | | 1,964,463 | |
| | CFDNo. 2018-03, Uptown Newport, 5.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,216,700 | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 27 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California Statewide CDA Student Housing Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | University of California, Irvine East Campus Apartments,CHF-Irvine LLC, Refunding, 5.00%, 5/15/40 | | $ | 1,500,000 | | | $ | 1,719,105 | |
| | University of California, Irvine East Campus Apartments, PhaseIV-A,CHF-Irvine LLC, Series A, 5.00%, 5/15/42 | | | 710,000 | | | | 825,467 | |
| | Capistrano USD, CFDNo. 2005-1 Special Tax, 5.50%, 9/01/43 | | | 4,955,000 | | | | 5,438,459 | |
| | Carson RDA, Tax Allocation Housing, Series A, 5.25%, 10/01/36 | | | 1,965,000 | | | | 2,057,768 | |
| | Casitas Municipal Water District Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2013-1, Ojai, Series B, BAM Insured, 5.00%, 9/01/42 | | | 8,000,000 | | | | 9,458,560 | |
| | CFDNo. 2013-1, Ojai, Series B, BAM Insured, 5.25%, 9/01/47 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 6,068,100 | |
| | Centinela Valley UHSD, | | | | | | | | |
| | GO, Los Angeles County, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2010, Refunding, Series B, AGMC Insured, zero cpn., 8/01/45 | | | 42,000,000 | | | | 10,240,440 | |
| | GO, Los Angeles County, Election of 2008, Series C, 5.00%, 8/01/35 | | | 4,195,000 | | | | 4,857,600 | |
| | Ceres USD, | | | | | | | | |
| | GO, Stanislaus County, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2008, Series A,Pre-Refunded, zero cpn., 8/01/39 | | | 6,450,000 | | | | 1,626,110 | |
| | GO, Stanislaus County, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2008, Series A,Pre-Refunded, zero cpn., 8/01/40 | | | 6,730,000 | | | | 1,578,522 | |
| | Chino CFDNo. 2003-3 Special Tax, Improvement Area No. 6, 5.00%, 9/01/45 | | | 1,665,000 | | | | 1,855,476 | |
| | Chino CFDNo. 2016-2 Special Tax, 5.00%, 9/01/42 | | | 1,535,000 | | | | 1,726,077 | |
| | Chula Vista CFD Special Tax No.16-I, | | | | | | | | |
| | Improvement Area No. 1, 5.00%, 9/01/43 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,137,750 | |
| | Improvement Area No. 1, 5.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 1,185,000 | | | | 1,345,082 | |
| | City of Fullerton Special Assessment, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFD No. 2, Amerige Heights, 5.00%, 9/01/34 | | | 1,075,000 | | | | 1,157,324 | |
| | CFD No. 2, Amerige Heights, 5.00%, 9/01/44 | | | 2,450,000 | | | | 2,610,475 | |
| | Clovis USD, | | | | | | | | |
| | GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2004, Series A, NATL Insured, zero cpn., 8/01/27 | | | 6,295,000 | | | | 5,327,333 | |
| | GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2004, Series A, NATL Insured, zero cpn., 8/01/28 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 2,461,830 | |
| | GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2004, Series A,Pre-Refunded, zero cpn., 8/01/27 | | | 1,205,000 | | | | 1,043,638 | |
| | Coachella Valley USD, | | | | | | | | |
| | GO, Riverside and Imperial Counties, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2005, Series D, AGMC Insured, zero cpn., 8/01/42 | | | 8,500,000 | | | | 4,007,240 | |
| | GO, Riverside and Imperial Counties, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2005, Series D, AGMC Insured, zero cpn., 8/01/43 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 1,359,780 | |
| | Compton Community College District GO, | | | | | | | | |
| | Election of 2002, Series B,Pre-Refunded, 6.625%, 8/01/27 | | | 3,085,000 | | | | 3,111,007 | |
| | Election of 2002, Series B,Pre-Refunded, 6.75%, 8/01/34 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,034,520 | |
| | Compton CRDA Tax Allocation, | | | | | | | | |
| | Redevelopment Project, second lien, Series B, 5.70%, 8/01/30 | | | 2,255,000 | | | | 2,337,059 | |
| | Redevelopment Project, second lien, Series B, 6.00%, 8/01/42 | | | 3,460,000 | | | | 3,592,034 | |
| | Corona CFDNo. 2001-2 Special Tax, Improvement Areas Nos. 1 and 2, Series A, 6.25%, 9/01/32 | | | 1,825,000 | | | | 1,832,337 | |
| | Corona CFDNo. 2003-2 Special Tax, Highlands Collection, 5.20%, 9/01/34 | | | 755,000 | | | | 755,521 | |
| | Corona CFDNo. 2018-1 Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | Improvement Area No. 1, Bedford, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/38 | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,350,912 | |
| | Improvement Area No. 1, Bedford, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,118,310 | |
| | Corona-Norco USD, Special Tax, CFDNo. 2005-1, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/36 | | | 500,000 | | | | 573,395 | |
| | | | |
| | |
28 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Cotati South Sonoma Business Park AD Special Assessment, Limited Obligation Improvement, 6.50%, 9/02/33 | | $ | 4,225,000 | | | $ | 4,155,625 | |
| | Cotati-Rohnert Park USD, GO, Election of 2014, Series C, BAM Insured, 5.00%, 8/01/45 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,611,600 | |
| | CSD San Bernardino County GO, | | | | | | | | |
| | Election of 2008, Series C, 5.00%, 8/01/44 | | | 3,615,000 | | | | 4,203,667 | |
| | Election of 2014, Series A, 5.00%, 8/01/44 | | | 7,375,000 | | | | 8,575,945 | |
| | Cudahy Community Development Commission Tax Allocation, City-Wide Redevelopment Project, Redevelopment Projects, Series B,Pre-Refunded, 7.75%, 10/01/27 | | | 3,795,000 | | | | 4,356,546 | |
| | Daly City Housing Development Finance Agency Mobile Home Park Revenue, Franciscan Mobile Home Park Acquisition Project, sub. bond, Refunding, Series B, 5.85%, 12/15/47 | | | 4,660,000 | | | | 4,660,979 | |
| | Dana Point CFD Special TaxNo. 2006-1, | | | | | | | | |
| | 5.00%, 9/01/38 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,067,130 | |
| | 5.00%, 9/01/45 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,675,000 | |
| | Del Mar Race Track Authority Revenue, Refunding, 5.00%, 10/01/35 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,207,740 | |
| | Del Paso Manor Water District Revenue COP, Phase I Improvement Project, 5.50%, 7/01/41 | | | 3,050,000 | | | | 3,186,274 | |
| | Duarte RDA Tax Allocation, Capital Appreciation, Merged Redevelopment Project, ETM, zero cpn., 12/01/28 | | | 26,260,000 | | | | 16,626,256 | |
| | Dublin CFD No. 1 Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | Improvement Area No. 1, Dublin Crossing, 5.00%, 9/01/37 | | | 1,550,000 | | | | 1,788,251 | |
| | Improvement Area No. 1, Dublin Crossing, 5.00%, 9/01/47 | | | 4,500,000 | | | | 5,106,600 | |
| | El Dorado County Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2014-1, Carson Creek, 4.00%, 9/01/43 | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,310,800 | |
| | CFDNo. 2014-1, Carson Creek, 5.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 2,850,000 | | | | 3,178,320 | |
| | El Rancho USD, GO, Los Angeles County, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2003, NATL Insured, zero cpn., 8/01/29 | | | 2,400,000 | | | | 1,885,080 | |
| | Fillmore Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFD No. 5 Improvement Area A, Heritage Valley Parks, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/40 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,647,030 | |
| | CFD No. 5 Improvement Area A, Heritage Valley Parks, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/45 | | | 2,630,000 | | | | 2,882,375 | |
| | Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Special Tax Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFD No. 19, Mongini Ranch, 5.00%, 9/01/47 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,431,880 | |
| | CFD No. 20, Russell Ranch, 5.00%, 9/01/28 | | | 600,000 | | | | 706,080 | |
| | CFD No. 20, Russell Ranch, 5.00%, 9/01/33 | | | 530,000 | | | | 614,021 | |
| | CFD No. 20, Russell Ranch, 5.00%, 9/01/38 | | | 850,000 | | | | 972,460 | |
| | CFD No. 20, Russell Ranch, 5.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 1,675,000 | | | | 1,898,830 | |
| | Fontana Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFD No. 80, Bella Strada, 5.00%, 9/01/46 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,145,230 | |
| | CFD No. 81, Gabriella, 4.00%, 9/01/43 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,055,330 | |
| | Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Capital Appreciation, Refunding, Series A, zero cpn., 1/15/42 | | | 75,000,000 | | | | 32,482,500 | |
| | Capital Appreciation, senior lien, Refunding, Series A, zero cpn., 1/15/33 | | | 19,000,000 | | | | 12,216,810 | |
| | junior lien, Refunding, Series C, 6.50%, 1/15/43 | | | 40,000,000 | | | | 47,375,600 | |
| | Refunding, Sub SeriesB-1, 3.95%, 1/15/53 | | | 25,000,000 | | | | 26,210,250 | |
| | Fremont CFD No. 1 Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | Pacific Commons, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/40 | | | 4,655,000 | | | | 5,210,341 | |
| | Pacific Commons, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/45 | | | 3,255,000 | | | | 3,630,399 | |
| | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Revenue, Asset-Backed, Series A, 5.00%, 6/01/45 | | | 37,630,000 | | | | 43,289,552 | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 29 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Tobacco Settlement Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Asset-Backed, Capital Appreciation, Second Subordinate, Refunding, Series C, zero cpn., 6/01/47 | | $ | 50,000,000 | | | $ | 8,385,000 | |
| | Asset-Backed, Refunding, SeriesA-1, 5.25%, 6/01/47 | | | 63,500,000 | | | | 63,935,610 | |
| | Asset-Backed, Refunding, SeriesA-2, 5.00%, 6/01/47 | | | 12,750,000 | | | | 12,686,377 | |
| | Asset-Backed, Senior, Refunding, SeriesA-2, 5.30%, 6/01/37 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,110,100 | |
| | Goleta RDA Tax Allocation, Goleta Old Town Redevelopment Project, 8.00%, 6/01/44 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,021,650 | |
| | Hanford Joint UHSD, | | | | | | | | |
| | GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2004, Series B, AGMC Insured, zero cpn., 8/01/32 | | | 3,635,000 | | | | 2,530,287 | |
| | GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2004, Series B, AGMC Insured, zero cpn., 8/01/33 | | | 3,705,000 | | | | 2,477,015 | |
| | GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2004, Series B, AGMC Insured, zero cpn., 8/01/35 | | | 4,120,000 | | | | 2,537,961 | |
| | Hartnell Community College District GO, | | | | | | | | |
| | Monterey and San Benito Counties, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2002, Series D,Pre-Refunded, zero cpn., 8/01/44 | | | 30,000,000 | | | | 4,671,000 | |
| | Monterey and San Benito Counties, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2002, Series D, zero cpn., 8/01/49 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 3,670,500 | |
| | Imperial Community College District GO, Imperial County, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2010, Series A, AGMC Insured,Pre-Refunded, 6.75%, 8/01/40 | | | 3,500,000 | | | | 4,613,175 | |
| | Imperial County Special Tax, CFDNo. 98-1, 6.50%, 9/01/31 | | | 5,605,000 | | | | 5,619,853 | |
| | Independent Cities Finance Authority Mobile Home Park Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Lamplighter Salinas Mobilehome Park, Series A, 6.25%, 7/15/45 | | | 2,465,000 | | | | 2,575,580 | |
| | Lamplighter Salinas Mobilehome Park, Series A, 6.25%, 7/15/50 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,081,580 | |
| | Pillar Ridge, Series A, 5.25%, 5/15/44 | | | 2,015,000 | | | | 2,197,761 | |
| | Pillar Ridge, Series A, 5.25%, 5/15/49 | | | 4,800,000 | | | | 5,223,936 | |
| | San Juan Mobile Estates, Refunding, 5.00%, 8/15/45 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,555,200 | |
| | San Juan Mobile Estates, Refunding, 5.00%, 8/15/50 | | | 4,900,000 | | | | 5,403,181 | |
| | Union City Tropics, Refunding, 5.00%, 5/15/48 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,509,850 | |
| | Indio CFD Special Tax,No. 2004-3, Terra Lago, Improvement Area No. 1, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/35 | | | 1,240,000 | | | | 1,376,685 | |
| | Inland Valley Development Agency Successor Agency Tax Allocation, | | | | | | | | |
| | Refunding, Series A, 5.25%, 9/01/37 | | | 7,500,000 | | | | 8,570,775 | |
| | Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/44 | | | 9,000,000 | | | | 10,093,140 | |
| | Irvine Special Tax Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2013-3, Great Park, Improvement Area No. 1, 5.00%, 9/01/39 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,102,930 | |
| | CFDNo. 2013-3, Great Park, Improvement Area No. 1, 5.00%, 9/01/44 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,646,685 | |
| | CFDNo. 2013-3, Great Park, Improvement Area No. 1, 5.00%, 9/01/49 | | | 2,750,000 | | | | 3,007,455 | |
| | CFDNo. 2013-3, Great Park, Improvement Area No. 8, 5.00%, 9/01/43 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,849,550 | |
| | CFDNo. 2013-3, Great Park, Improvement Area No. 8, 5.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 3,250,000 | | | | 3,693,137 | |
| | CFDNo. 2013-3, Great Park, Improvement Area No. 8, AGMC Insured, 5.00%, 9/01/51 | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,445,800 | |
| | Irvine USD Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 06-1, Portola Springs, 6.70%, 9/01/35 | | | 2,565,000 | | | | 2,687,222 | |
| | CFDNo. 09-1, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/45 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,288,500 | |
| | CFDNo. 09-1, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/49 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,278,540 | |
| | CFDNo. 09-1, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/42 | | | 700,000 | | | | 804,195 | |
| | CFDNo. 09-1, Series B, 5.00%, 9/01/42 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,148,850 | |
| | CFDNo. 09-1, Series B, 5.00%, 9/01/51 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,831,350 | |
| | CFDNo. 09-1, Series C, 5.00%, 9/01/47 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,143,460 | |
| | CFDNo. 09-1, Series C, 4.00%, 9/01/53 | | | 1,260,000 | | | | 1,313,537 | |
| | CFDNo. 09-1, Series D, 5.00%, 9/01/49 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,141,620 | |
| | | | |
| | |
30 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Jurupa PFA Special Tax Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/42 | | $ | 2,220,000 | | | $ | 2,512,640 | |
| | Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/43 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,531,640 | |
| | sub. lien, Series B, 5.00%, 9/01/40 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,447,280 | |
| | Kaweah Delta Health Care District Revenue, Series B, 5.00%, 6/01/40 | | | 3,250,000 | | | | 3,582,930 | |
| | La Verne COP, Brethren Hillcrest Homes, 5.00%, 5/15/36 | | | 1,430,000 | | | | 1,499,984 | |
| | La Verne Mobile Home Park Revenue, Copacabana Mobilehome Park, Refunding, 5.00%, 6/15/49 | | | 1,765,000 | | | | 1,949,513 | |
| | Lake Elsinore PFA Local Agency Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | ADNo. 93-1, Refunding, Series B, 5.125%, 9/02/30 | | | 4,980,000 | | | | 5,445,182 | |
| | Canyon Hills Improvement Area Development, Series A, 5.75%, 9/01/44 | | | 3,240,000 | | | | 3,549,776 | |
| | CFDNo. 98-1, Series C, 5.25%, 9/01/33 | | | 8,000,000 | | | | 8,671,680 | |
| | Lake Tahoe USD, GO, Election of 2008, Convertible Capital Appreciation, zero cpn. to 8/01/25, 5.30% thereafter, 8/01/40 | | | 1,140,000 | | | | 1,057,829 | |
| | Lammersville Joint USD Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2014-1, Improvement Area No. 1, Mountain House School Facilities, 5.00%, 9/01/43 | | | 775,000 | | | | 881,904 | |
| | CFDNo. 2014-1, Improvement Area No. 1, Mountain House School Facilities, 5.00%, 9/01/47 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,575,840 | |
| | CFDNo. 2014-1, Improvement Area No. 1, Mountain House School Facilities, 5.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,840,225 | |
| | Lancaster RDA Successor Agency Tax Allocation, Combined Redevelopment Project Areas, Housing Programs, Refunding, AGMC Insured, 4.00%, 8/01/39 | | | 3,500,000 | | | | 3,799,810 | |
| | Lancaster RDA Tax Allocation, | | | | | | | | |
| | Combined Redevelopment Project Areas, Housing Programs,Pre-Refunded, 6.875%, 8/01/34 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,017,480 | |
| | Combined Redevelopment Project Areas, Housing Programs,Pre-Refunded, 6.875%, 8/01/39 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,017,480 | |
| | Las Virgenes USD, GO, Election of 2006, Convertible Capital Appreciation, Series C, zero cpn. to 8/01/26, 6.75% thereafter, 8/01/33 | | | 8,050,000 | | | | 8,382,465 | |
| | Lathrop Financing Authority Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Mossdale Village, Refunding, Series A, 6.00%, 9/02/28 | | | 1,010,000 | | | | 1,101,233 | |
| | Mossdale Village, Refunding, Series A, 6.00%, 9/02/29 | | | 1,070,000 | | | | 1,161,838 | |
| | Mossdale Village, Refunding, Series A, 6.00%, 9/02/30 | | | 1,075,000 | | | | 1,165,515 | |
| | Mossdale Village, Refunding, Series A, 5.50%, 9/02/35 | | | 3,670,000 | | | | 3,859,299 | |
| | Lee Lake PFAR, | | | | | | | | |
| | Special Tax, junior lien, Refunding, Series B, 5.25%, 9/01/32 | | | 1,155,000 | | | | 1,249,352 | |
| | Special Tax, junior lien, Refunding, Series B, 5.375%, 9/01/35 | | | 805,000 | | | | 870,736 | |
| | Lemon Grove CDA Successor Agency Tax Allocation, Lemon Grove Redevelopment Project Area, Refunding, AGMC Insured, 4.00%, 8/01/34 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,126,590 | |
| | Lemon Grove School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2008, Series B, AGMC Insured, zero cpn. to 8/01/28, 6.10% thereafter, 8/01/45 | | | 6,500,000 | | | | 6,191,380 | |
| | Long Beach Bond Finance Authority Natural Gas Purchase Revenue, Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/29 | | | 4,630,000 | | | | 5,761,850 | |
| | Long Beach Marina Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Los Angeles County, Alamitos Bay Marina Project, 5.00%, 5/15/34 | | | 1,300,000 | | | | 1,460,212 | |
| | Los Angeles County, Alamitos Bay Marina Project, 5.00%, 5/15/40 | | | 3,500,000 | | | | 3,865,925 | |
| | Los Angeles County, Alamitos Bay Marina Project, 5.00%, 5/15/45 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,754,700 | |
| | Los Alamitos USD, | | | | | | | | |
| | COP, Capital Appreciation, Capital Projects, zero cpn. to 7/31/24, 5.95% thereafter, 8/01/34 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,537,335 | |
| | COP, Capital Appreciation, Capital Projects, zero cpn. to 7/31/24, 5.95% thereafter, 8/01/42 | | | 4,500,000 | | | | 4,493,070 | |
| | Los Angeles County Schools Regionalized Business Services Corp. COP, Pooled Financing Program, Antelope Valley Community College District, Series C,Pre-Refunded, 5.00%, 6/01/30 | | | 2,200,000 | | | | 2,281,048 | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 31 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Mendocino-Lake Community College District GO, | | | | | | | | |
| | Capital Appreciation, Election of 2006, Series B, AGMC Insured, zero cpn. to 8/01/21, 6.55% thereafter, 8/01/36 | | $ | 5,150,000 | | | $ | 6,424,470 | |
| | Capital Appreciation, Election of 2006, Series B, AGMC Insured, zero cpn. to 8/01/26, 6.85% thereafter, 8/01/40 | | | 7,500,000 | | | | 8,079,825 | |
| | Menifee USD Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2011-1, Improvement Area No. 3, 5.00%, 9/01/43 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,134,660 | |
| | CFDNo. 2011-1, Improvement Area No. 3, 5.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,697,955 | |
| | aCFDNo. 2011-1, Improvement Area No. 4, 5.00%, 9/01/44 | | | 1,245,000 | | | | 1,428,513 | |
| | aCFDNo. 2011-1, Improvement Area No. 4, 5.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 1,600,000 | | | | 1,831,344 | |
| | Merced RDA Tax Allocation, Merced Gateways Redevelopment Project, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 6.50%, 9/01/39 | | | 6,250,000 | | | | 6,327,812 | |
| | Merced UHSD, GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2008, Series C,Pre-Refunded, zero cpn., 8/01/41 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 2,416,800 | |
| | Moreland School District GO, Election of 2010, Series B, 5.00%, 8/01/41 | | | 4,045,000 | | | | 4,689,813 | |
| | Moreno Valley USD, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2015-2 Special Tax, 5.00%, 9/01/44 | | | 870,000 | | | | 972,469 | |
| | CFDNo. 2015-3 Special Tax, 4.125%, 9/01/48 | | | 1,160,000 | | | | 1,202,027 | |
| | M-S-R Energy Authority Gas Revenue, Series B, 6.50%, 11/01/39 | | | 32,300,000 | | | | 48,533,334 | |
| | Murrieta CFDNo. 2005-5 Special Tax, Golden City, Improvement Area B, 5.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 3,740,000 | | | | 4,212,287 | |
| | North Natomas CFD Special Tax, No. 4, Refunding, Series E, 5.25%, 9/01/33 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,373,890 | |
| | Oak Park USD, GO, Capital Appreciation, Series A, zero cpn. to 8/01/21, 7.10% thereafter, 8/01/38 | | | 6,600,000 | | | | 8,429,784 | |
| | Oakdale PFAR, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/35 | | | 1,270,000 | | | | 1,407,439 | |
| | Oakland USD Alameda County GO, Election of 2012,Pre-Refunded, 6.625%, 8/01/38 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,572,700 | |
| | Oakley PFAR, | | | | | | | | |
| | Contra Costa County, Refunding, 5.30%, 9/02/34 | | | 995,000 | | | | 1,108,928 | |
| | Contra Costa County, Refunding, BAM Insured, 5.00%, 9/02/36 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,724,730 | |
| | Ontario CFD No. 28 Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | New Haven Facilities, Area A, 5.00%, 9/01/42 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,112,100 | |
| | New Haven Facilities, Area A, 5.00%, 9/01/47 | | | 500,000 | | | | 556,825 | |
| | Ontario CFD No. 31 Special Tax, Amberly Lane, Carriage House, 5.00%, 9/01/47 | | | 1,100,000 | | | | 1,255,221 | |
| | Orange County CFDNo. 2015-1 Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | Village of Esencia, Series A, 5.00%, 8/15/34 | | | 1,530,000 | | | | 1,728,150 | |
| | Village of Esencia, Series A, 5.25%, 8/15/45 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,631,700 | |
| | Orange County CFDNo. 2017-1 Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | Village of Esencia, Improvement Area No. 1, Series A, 5.00%, 8/15/42 | | | 6,230,000 | | | | 7,235,584 | |
| | Village of Esencia, Improvement Area No. 1, Series A, 5.00%, 8/15/47 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 11,570,600 | |
| | Orchard School District GO, Election of 2001, Series B, AGMC Insured,Pre-Refunded, 6.00%, 8/01/36 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,163,320 | |
| | Oro Grande Elementary School District COP, | | | | | | | | |
| | 5.875%, 9/15/37 | | | 14,000,000 | | | | 14,661,360 | |
| | 6.125%, 9/15/40 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,581,150 | |
| | Oroville Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Oroville Hospital, 5.25%, 4/01/49 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,611,080 | |
| | Oroville Hospital, 5.25%, 4/01/54 | | | 3,500,000 | | | | 4,015,445 | |
| | Palomar Health COP, | | | | | | | | |
| | Palomar Health and Arch Health Partners Inc., 4.00%, 11/01/38 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,194,600 | |
| | Palomar Health and Arch Health Partners Inc., 4.00%, 11/01/47 | | | 6,000,000 | | | | 6,206,700 | |
| | | | |
| | |
32 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Palomar Health Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Refunding, 5.00%, 11/01/36 | | $ | 6,250,000 | | | $ | 7,072,187 | |
| | Refunding, 5.00%, 11/01/42 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,590,050 | |
| | Palomar Pomerado Health COP, | | | | | | | | |
| | Pre-Refunded, 6.00%, 11/01/30 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 10,646,400 | |
| | Pre-Refunded, 6.75%, 11/01/39 | | | 15,550,000 | | | | 15,889,767 | |
| | Paramount USD, GO, Los Angeles County, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2006, BAM Insured, zero cpn., 8/01/51 | | | 25,000,000 | | | | 3,118,500 | |
| | Paso Robles Joint USD, GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2006, Series A, zero cpn., 9/01/45 | | | 15,000,000 | | | | 5,929,350 | |
| | Perris CFDNo. 2001-2 Special Tax, Villages of Avalon, Refunding, Series A, 5.25%, 9/01/32 | | | 4,500,000 | | | | 4,951,080 | |
| | Perris Joint Powers Authority Local Agency Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2001-1, Improvement Area Nos. 6 and 7, Refunding, Series E, 4.25%, 9/01/38 | | | 4,195,000 | | | | 4,407,896 | |
| | CFDNo. 2014-1, Improvement Area No. 2, Avelina, Series A, 4.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 2,530,000 | | | | 2,608,759 | |
| | May Farms, Improvement Area Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Refunding, Series A, 5.375%, 9/01/33 | | | 1,980,000 | | | | 2,193,860 | |
| | Willowbrook, Refunding, Series B, 5.25%, 9/01/33 | | | 3,830,000 | | | | 4,102,428 | |
| | Perris PFAR Tax Allocation, Housing Loan, Series A, 6.125%, 10/01/40 | | | 3,135,000 | | | | 3,316,203 | |
| | Pico Rivera Water Authority Revenue, Refunding, Series A, 6.25%, 12/01/32 | | | 5,295,000 | | | | 5,345,408 | |
| | Pittsburg USD, | | | | | | | | |
| | GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2010, Series C, zero cpn., 8/01/47 | | | 9,000,000 | | | | 1,960,110 | |
| | GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2010, Series C, zero cpn., 8/01/52 | | | 15,000,000 | | | | 2,344,950 | |
| | Porterville PFA Sewer Revenue, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 5.625%, 10/01/36 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,509,350 | |
| | Poway RDA Successor Agency Tax Allocation, Paguay Redevelopment Project, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 12/15/30 | | | 3,500,000 | | | | 4,580,345 | |
| | Poway USD Special Tax, CFD No. 15, Del Sur East, Improvement Area C, 5.00%, 9/01/46 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,247,460 | |
| | Rancho Cordova CFDNo. 2005-1 Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | Sunridge North Douglas, 5.00%, 9/01/40 | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,338,156 | |
| | Sunridge North Douglas, 5.00%, 9/01/45 | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,389,150 | |
| | Redondo Beach USD, GO, Election of 2008, Capital Appreciation, Series E, zero cpn. to 8/01/22, 6.20% thereafter, 8/01/31 | | | 2,750,000 | | | | 3,245,385 | |
| | Richland School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2008, Refunding, Series C, AGMC Insured, zero cpn., 8/01/49 | | | 22,000,000 | | | | 6,920,320 | |
| | Rio Elementary School District CFD No. 1 Special Tax, 5.50%, 9/01/39 | | | 6,915,000 | | | | 7,712,230 | |
| | Rio Hondo Community College District GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2004, Series C, zero cpn. to 8/01/24, 6.85% thereafter, 8/01/42 | | | 13,000,000 | | | | 15,230,150 | |
| | Rio Vista CFDNo. 2018-1 Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | Liberty Community, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/33 | | | 1,625,000 | | | | 1,871,984 | |
| | Liberty Community, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/38 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,141,390 | |
| | Liberty Community, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 1,190,000 | | | | 1,350,769 | |
| | Riverbank USD, | | | | | | | | |
| | GO, Election of 2005, Series B, Assured Guaranty, zero cpn., 8/01/38 | | | 6,690,000 | | | | 3,536,200 | |
| | GO, Election of 2005, Series B, Assured Guaranty, zero cpn., 8/01/43 | | | 8,750,000 | | | | 3,695,212 | |
| | Riverside County RDA Tax Allocation, | | | | | | | | |
| | Desert Communities Redevelopment Project Area, second lien, Series D, 7.00%, 12/01/31 | | | 1,425,000 | | | | 1,607,571 | |
| | Desert Communities Redevelopment Project Area, second lien, Series D, 7.25%, 12/01/37 | | | 2,505,000 | | | | 2,847,308 | |
| | Housing, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 6.00%, 10/01/39 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,186,630 | |
| | Housing, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 7.125%, 10/01/42 | | | 1,750,000 | | | | 1,981,805 | |
| | Jurupa Valley Redevelopment Project Area, Series B, 6.75%, 10/01/30 | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,338,036 | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 33 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Riverside County Redevelopment Successor Agency Tax Allocation, Housing, Refunding, Series A, AGMC Insured, 4.00%, 10/01/37 | | $ | 6,000,000 | | | $ | 6,379,620 | |
| | Riverside County Special Tax, CFDNo. 03-1, Newport Road, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/30 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,677,630 | |
| | Riverside County Transportation Commission Toll Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Capital Appreciation, senior lien, Series B, zero cpn., 6/01/43 | | | 7,500,000 | | | | 3,104,100 | |
| | senior lien, Series A, 5.75%, 6/01/44 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,539,500 | |
| | Riverside PFA Local Measure Sales Tax Revenue, Payment Rehabilitation Project, AGMC Insured, 5.00%, 6/01/33 | | | 4,280,000 | | | | 4,815,984 | |
| | Riverside USD Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFD No. 32, 4.00%, 9/01/43 | | | 1,600,000 | | | | 1,675,520 | |
| | CFD No. 32, 4.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 1,850,000 | | | | 1,940,317 | |
| | RNR School Financing Authority Special Tax, CFDNo. 92-1, Series A, BAM Insured, 5.00%, 9/01/41 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,477,150 | |
| | Road 17 Levee Area PFA Assessment Revenue, Road 17 Levee Improvement Project,Pre-Refunded, 6.75%, 9/01/29 | | | 2,630,000 | | | | 2,664,322 | |
| | Rocklin Special Tax, CFD No.10, Whitney Ranch, 5.00%, 9/01/40 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,236,920 | |
| | The Romoland School District Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2004-1, Heritage Lake, Improvement Area No. 3, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/36 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,631,130 | |
| | CFDNo. 2004-1, Heritage Lake, Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/35 | | | 4,690,000 | | | | 5,294,119 | |
| | CFDNo. 2004-1, Heritage Lake, Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/38 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,367,140 | |
| | CFDNo. 2006-1, Brendle Mills, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/44 | | | 1,120,000 | | | | 1,283,464 | |
| | CFDNo. 91-1, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/41 | | | 1,265,000 | | | | 1,452,435 | |
| | Roseville Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiddyment Ranch CFD No. 5, Public Facilities, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/32 | | | 1,265,000 | | | | 1,437,584 | |
| | Fiddyment Ranch CFD No. 5, Public Facilities, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/47 | | | 6,500,000 | | | | 7,218,055 | |
| | HP Campus Oaks CFD No. 1, Public Facilities, 5.00%, 9/01/36 | | | 2,300,000 | | | | 2,559,854 | |
| | HP Campus Oaks CFD No. 1, Public Facilities, 5.50%, 9/01/46 | | | 7,550,000 | | | | 8,544,184 | |
| | Westbrook CFD No. 1, Public Facilities, 5.00%, 9/01/29 | | | 500,000 | | | | 562,395 | |
| | Westbrook CFD No. 1, Public Facilities, 5.00%, 9/01/34 | | | 1,100,000 | | | | 1,220,571 | |
| | Westbrook CFD No. 1, Public Facilities, 5.00%, 9/01/39 | | | 1,885,000 | | | | 2,074,197 | |
| | Westbrook CFD No. 1, Public Facilities, 5.00%, 9/01/44 | | | 1,650,000 | | | | 1,810,562 | |
| | Westbrook CFD No. 1, Public Facilities, 5.00%, 9/01/44 | | | 1,475,000 | | | | 1,702,076 | |
| | Westbrook CFD No. 1, Public Facilities, 5.00%, 9/01/49 | | | 2,325,000 | | | | 2,672,750 | |
| | Westpark CFD No. 1, Public Facilities, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/32 | | | 1,120,000 | | | | 1,269,206 | |
| | Westpark CFD No. 1, Public Facilities, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/33 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,130,650 | |
| | Westpark CFD No. 1, Public Facilities, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/37 | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,402,625 | |
| | Rowland USD, | | | | | | | | |
| | GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2006, Series B, zero cpn., 8/01/34 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 3,057,800 | |
| | GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2006, Series B, zero cpn., 8/01/39 | | | 15,000,000 | | | | 7,525,350 | |
| | GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2006, Series B, zero cpn., 8/01/42 | | | 10,750,000 | | | | 5,149,465 | |
| | Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Special Assessment, Natomas Basin Local Assessment, Refunding, BAM Insured, 5.00%, 10/01/44 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,268,840 | |
| | Sacramento Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | Natomas Central CFD No. 2, 5.00%, 9/01/46 | | | 1,815,000 | | | | 2,051,204 | |
| | Natomas Meadows, CFDNo. 2007-01, Improvement Area No. 2, 5.00%, 9/01/44 | | | 500,000 | | | | 569,280 | |
| | Natomas Meadows, CFDNo. 2007-01, Improvement Area No. 2, 5.00%, 9/01/49 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,133,630 | |
| | Natomas Meadows CFD No. 1, Improvement Area No. 1, 5.00%, 9/01/32 | | | 300,000 | | | | 336,462 | |
| | Natomas Meadows CFD No. 1, Improvement Area No. 1, 5.00%, 9/01/37 | | | 710,000 | | | | 791,877 | |
| | | | |
| | |
34 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Sacramento Special Tax, (continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Natomas Meadows CFD No. 1, Improvement Area No. 1, 5.00%, 9/01/47 | | $ | 1,900,000 | | | $ | 2,102,407 | |
| | San Bernardino Community College District GO, | | | | | | | | |
| | Capital Appreciation, Election of 2008, Series A, zero cpn., 8/01/44 | | | 12,495,000 | | | | 5,144,566 | |
| | Election of 2008, Series D, 5.00%, 8/01/45 | | | 2,755,000 | | | | 3,193,376 | |
| | Election of 2008, Series D, 5.00%, 8/01/48 | | | 3,760,000 | | | | 4,347,763 | |
| | San Bernardino County Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2006-1, Improvement Area No. 1, Lytle Creek North, 5.00%, 9/01/40 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,116,910 | |
| | CFDNo. 2006-1, Improvement Area No. 2, Lytle Creek North, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/45 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,112,420 | |
| | San Buenaventura Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Community Memorial Health System, 8.00%, 12/01/31 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 11,273,500 | |
| | Community Memorial Health System, 7.50%, 12/01/41 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,564,000 | |
| | San Clemente Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2006-1, 5.00%, 9/01/40 | | | 1,780,000 | | | | 1,987,637 | |
| | CFDNo. 2006-1, 5.00%, 9/01/46 | | | 2,475,000 | | | | 2,748,983 | |
| | San Diego RDA Tax Allocation Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | City Heights Redevelopment Project, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 5.625%, 9/01/40 | | | 2,315,000 | | | | 2,439,362 | |
| | Naval Training Center Redevelopment Project, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 5.75%, 9/01/40 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,165,750 | |
| | San Diego Tobacco Settlement Revenue, Funding Corp., Subordinate, Refunding, Series C, 4.00%, 6/01/32 | | | 975,000 | | | | 1,025,398 | |
| | San Diego USD, | | | | | | | | |
| | GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2008, Series A,Pre-Refunded, zero cpn. to 7/01/19, 6.00% thereafter, 7/01/33 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 12,097,100 | |
| | GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2008, Series C, zero cpn. to 7/01/30, 6.625% thereafter, 7/01/47 | | | 26,025,000 | | | | 24,415,093 | |
| | GO, Dedicated Unlimited Ad Valorem Property Tax, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2008, Series E, zero cpn. to 7/01/32, 5.25% thereafter, 7/01/42 | | | 6,940,000 | | | | 5,354,002 | |
| | GO, Dedicated Unlimited Ad Valorem Property Tax, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2008, Series E, zero cpn. to 7/01/32, 5.375% thereafter, 7/01/47 | | | 13,500,000 | | | | 10,657,035 | |
| | San Francisco City and County Airport Commission International Airport Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Refunding, Second Series, Series A, 5.00%, 5/01/49 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 11,999,100 | |
| | Refunding, Second Series, Series D, 5.00%, 5/01/48 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 11,835,000 | |
| | San Francisco City and County RDA Successor Agency CFD No. 6 Special Tax, Mission Bay South Public Improvements, Capital Appreciation, Refunding, Series C, zero cpn., 8/01/43 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 2,714,200 | |
| | San Francisco City and County RDA Successor Agency Tax Allocation, | | | | | | | | |
| | Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, Capital Appreciation, Subordinate, Series D, zero cpn., 8/01/23 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 1,703,920 | |
| | Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, Capital Appreciation, Subordinate, Series D, zero cpn., 8/01/26 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 2,201,190 | |
| | Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, Capital Appreciation, Subordinate, Series D, zero cpn., 8/01/31 | | | 6,000,000 | | | | 3,413,640 | |
| | Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, Capital Appreciation, Subordinate, Series D, zero cpn., 8/01/43 | | | 16,500,000 | | | | 5,099,160 | |
| | Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, Series A, 5.00%, 8/01/43 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,822,275 | |
| | San Francisco City and County Redevelopment Financing Authority Tax Allocation Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Mission Bay North Redevelopment Project, Series C,Pre-Refunded, 6.75%, 8/01/41 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,090,490 | |
| | Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, Series D,Pre-Refunded, 7.00%, 8/01/33 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,093,880 | |
| | Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, Series D,Pre-Refunded, 6.625%, 8/01/39 | | | 2,265,000 | | | | 2,284,094 | |
| | Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, Series D,Pre-Refunded, 7.00%, 8/01/41 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,640,820 | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 35 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | San Francisco City and County Redevelopment Financing Authority Tax Allocation Revenue, (continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | San Francisco Redevelopment Projects, Series B,Pre-Refunded, 6.625%, 8/01/41 | | $ | 2,500,000 | | | $ | 2,721,100 | |
| | aSan Jacinto USD Financing Authority Special Tax Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | 5.00%, 9/01/44 | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,383,324 | |
| | 5.00%, 9/01/49 | | | 2,650,000 | | | | 3,045,486 | |
| | San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Capital Appreciation, junior lien, ETM, zero cpn., 1/01/28 | | | 19,150,000 | | | | 16,548,472 | |
| | Capital Appreciation, Refunding, Series A, NATL Insured, zero cpn., 1/15/26 | | | 19,475,000 | | | | 16,272,920 | |
| | Capital Appreciation, Refunding, Series A, NATL Insured, zero cpn., 1/15/32 | | | 50,225,000 | | | | 33,328,305 | |
| | junior lien, Refunding, Series B, 5.25%, 1/15/44 | | | 35,000,000 | | | | 39,238,500 | |
| | junior lien, Refunding, Series B, 5.25%, 1/15/49 | | | 75,000,000 | | | | 83,890,500 | |
| | San Jose Airport Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 3/01/36 | | | 2,250,000 | | | | 2,649,623 | |
| | Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 3/01/37 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,935,125 | |
| | Refunding, Series A, BAM Insured, 4.00%, 3/01/42 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,347,500 | |
| | Refunding, Series B, 5.00%, 3/01/42 | | | 2,550,000 | | | | 3,006,450 | |
| | San Mateo Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2008-1, Bay Meadows, 5.875%, 9/01/32 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,661,070 | |
| | CFDNo. 2008-1, Bay Meadows, 5.375%, 9/01/38 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,699,675 | |
| | CFDNo. 2008-1, Bay Meadows, 6.00%, 9/01/42 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,539,800 | |
| | CFDNo. 2008-1, Bay Meadows, 5.50%, 9/01/44 | | | 3,300,000 | | | | 3,568,785 | |
| | a San Rafael Elementary School District GO, | | | | | | | | |
| | Marin County, Election of 2015, Series C, 5.00%, 8/01/43 | | | 2,565,000 | | | | 3,051,375 | |
| | Marin County, Election of 2015, Series C, 4.00%, 8/01/47 | | | 2,720,000 | | | | 2,954,654 | |
| | Santa Barbara Elementary School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2010, Series A, zero cpn. to 8/01/23, 7.00% thereafter, 8/01/36 | | | 8,000,000 | | | | 9,902,240 | |
| | Santa Cruz County RDA Tax Allocation, Live Oak/Soquel Community Improvement Project Area, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 6.625%, 9/01/29 | | | 2,650,000 | | | | 2,683,788 | |
| | Santa Margarita Water District Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2013-1, Village of Sendero, 5.625%, 9/01/36 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,298,140 | |
| | CFDNo. 2013-1, Village of Sendero, 5.625%, 9/01/43 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 10,982,300 | |
| | Santa Paula Utility Authority Wastewater Enterprise Revenue, Series A, 5.00%, 2/01/40 | | | 5,105,000 | | | | 5,878,407 | |
| | Santee Community Development Commission Tax Allocation, | | | | | | | | |
| | Santee Community Redevelopment Project, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 7.00%, 8/01/31 | | | 1,800,000 | | | | 1,968,984 | |
| | Santee Community Redevelopment Project, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 7.00%, 8/01/41 | | | 2,820,000 | | | | 3,084,742 | |
| | Saugus Castaic School Facilities Financing Authority Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFD No.2006-1C, 5.875%, 9/01/33 | | | 1,370,000 | | | | 1,541,401 | |
| | CFD No.2006-1C, 6.00%, 9/01/43 | | | 3,450,000 | | | | 3,850,407 | |
| | Saugus USD Special Tax, Senior CFDNo. 2006-1, 4.25%, 9/01/44 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,610,900 | |
| | Saugus/Hart School Facilities Financing Authority Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2006-1 Saugus USD, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/41 | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,406,388 | |
| | CFDNo. 2006-1 Saugus USD, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/46 | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,401,513 | |
| | Sierra Joint Community College District GO, Placer EL Dorado and Sacramento Counties, Election of 2018, School Facilities ID No. 4, Series A, 4.00%, 8/01/53 | | | 3,500,000 | | | | 3,792,635 | |
| | Simi Valley ADNo. 98-1 Special Assessment, Madera/Royal Public Improvements, Limited Obligation Improvements, 7.30%, 9/02/24 | | | 1,175,000 | | | | 1,182,074 | |
| | Siskiyou UHSD, GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2008, Series B, AGMC Insured, zero cpn., 8/01/49 | | | 15,015,000 | | | | 4,562,007 | |
| | | | |
| | |
36 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Sonoma CDA Tax Allocation, Redevelopment Project, 7.00%, 12/01/30 | | $ | 2,115,000 | | | $ | 2,393,736 | |
| | St. Helena USD, GO, Capital Appreciation, zero cpn. to 8/01/25, 6.45% thereafter, 6/01/36 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 11,292,800 | |
| | Sulphur Springs USD Special Tax Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2006-1, 5.00%, 9/01/43 | | | 1,410,000 | | | | 1,573,165 | |
| | CFDNo. 2006-1, 5.00%, 9/01/47 | | | 1,820,000 | | | | 2,026,843 | |
| | Susanville PFAR, | | | | | | | | |
| | Utility Enterprises Project, Refunding, Sub Series B, 5.50%, 6/01/30 | | | 1,185,000 | | | | 1,219,614 | |
| | Utility Enterprises Project, Refunding, Sub Series B, 5.875%, 6/01/35 | | | 1,660,000 | | | | 1,708,555 | |
| | Utility Enterprises Project, Refunding, Sub Series B, 6.00%, 6/01/45 | | | 6,180,000 | | | | 6,352,916 | |
| | Susanville School District GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2008, AGMC Insured, zero cpn., 8/01/49 | | | 17,505,000 | | | | 5,444,055 | |
| | Temecula RDA Tax Allocation Revenue, Housing, Redevelopment Project No. 1, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 7.00%, 8/01/39 | | | 2,100,000 | | | | 2,352,945 | |
| | Tobacco Securitization Authority Northern California Tobacco Settlement Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Asset-Backed, SeriesA-1, 5.375%, 6/01/38 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,021,500 | |
| | Asset-Backed, SeriesA-1, 5.50%, 6/01/45 | | | 800,000 | | | | 803,480 | |
| | Sacramento County Tobacco Securitization Corp., Asset Backed, SeriesA-2, 5.40%, 6/01/27 | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,255,388 | |
| | Tobacco Securitization Authority Southern California Tobacco Settlement Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | First Subordinate Capital Appreciation, Series B, zero cpn., 6/01/46 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 1,641,300 | |
| | Second Subordinate Capital Appreciation, Refunding, Series C, zero cpn., 6/01/46 | | | 25,000,000 | | | | 3,317,500 | |
| | Torrance USD, GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2008, Measure Z, SeriesB-1, zero cpn., 8/01/34 | | | 5,640,000 | | | | 3,157,216 | |
| | Tracy CFDNo. 2016-1 Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | Improvement Area No. 1, Tracy Hills, 5.00%, 9/01/33 | | | 1,610,000 | | | | 1,863,720 | |
| | Improvement Area No. 1, Tracy Hills, 5.00%, 9/01/38 | | | 2,385,000 | | | | 2,729,466 | |
| | Improvement Area No. 1, Tracy Hills, 5.00%, 9/01/43 | | | 3,250,000 | | | | 3,703,570 | |
| | Improvement Area No. 1, Tracy Hills, 5.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 3,690,000 | | | | 4,192,320 | |
| | Truckee-Donner PUD Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 04-1, 5.20%, 9/01/25 | | | 2,985,000 | | | | 2,943,329 | |
| | CFDNo. 04-1, 5.75%, 9/01/29 | | | 2,950,000 | | | | 2,949,734 | |
| | CFDNo. 04-1, 5.25%, 9/01/30 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 4,819,800 | |
| | CFDNo. 04-1, 5.80%, 9/01/35 | | | 4,485,000 | | | | 4,400,503 | |
| | Tulare RDA Tax Allocation, Merged Tulare Redevelopment Projects, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 6.25%, 8/01/40 | | | 3,540,000 | | | | 3,738,629 | |
| | Tulare Sewer Revenue,Pre-Refunded, 6.50%, 11/15/45 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 10,327,700 | |
| | Turlock PFA Tax Allocation Revenue,Pre-Refunded, 7.50%, 9/01/39 | | | 3,750,000 | | | | 4,151,737 | |
| | Tustin CFDNo. 06-1 Special Tax, Legacy/Columbus Villages, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/37 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,157,230 | |
| | Tustin CFDNo. 07-1 Special Tax, Tustin Legacy/Retail Center, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/37 | | | 2,330,000 | | | | 2,616,380 | |
| | Tustin CFDNo. 14-1 Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | Legacy/Standard Pacific, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/40 | | | 750,000 | | | | 837,938 | |
| | Legacy/Standard Pacific, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/45 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,114,230 | |
| | Tustin USD, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 06-1 Special Tax,Pre-Refunded, 5.75%, 9/01/30 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,055,250 | |
| | CFDNo. 06-1 Special Tax,Pre-Refunded, 6.00%, 9/01/40 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,174,960 | |
| | University of California Revenue, Refunding, Series AO, 5.00%, 5/15/40 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,806,250 | |
| | Val Verde USD Special Tax CFDNo. 2014-1 Revenue, Legacy Properties, 4.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,046,390 | |
| | Val Verde USD Special Tax Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/29 | | | 3,200,000 | | | | 3,639,264 | |
| | Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/37 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,226,180 | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 37 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Vallejo RDA Tax Allocation, HousingSet-Aside, Refunding, Series A, 7.00%, 10/01/31 | | $ | 3,060,000 | | | $ | 3,069,976 | |
| | Vernon Electric System Revenue, Series A, 5.50%, 8/01/41 | | | 7,500,000 | | | | 8,043,600 | |
| | Victor Elementary School District CFDNo. 2005-1 Special Tax, 5.00%, 9/01/46 | | | 1,385,000 | | | | 1,600,686 | |
| | Victor Elementary School District GO, Election of 2008, Refunding, Series B, 5.00%, 8/01/42 | | | 5,455,000 | | | | 6,268,450 | |
| | Victor Valley Community College District GO, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2002, Series C, zero cpn., 6/01/49 | | | 11,940,000 | | | | 4,239,416 | |
| | aVista USD, GO, San Diego County, Election of 2018, Series A, 4.00%, 8/01/48 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,473,400 | |
| | Washington Township Health Care District Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Refunding, Series B, 4.00%, 7/01/35 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,122,160 | |
| | Refunding, Series B, 4.00%, 7/01/36 | | | 1,900,000 | | | | 2,011,587 | |
| | Series A, 5.50%, 7/01/38 | | | 2,890,000 | | | | 3,000,109 | |
| | West Hollywood Community Development Commission Tax Allocation, | | | | | | | | |
| | East Side Redevelopment Project, Series A, 7.25%, 9/01/31 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,136,260 | |
| | East Side Redevelopment Project, Series A, 7.50%, 9/01/42 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,680,850 | |
| | Woodland Finance Authority Water Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | 6.00%, 3/01/36 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,073,880 | |
| | 6.00%, 3/01/41 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,609,470 | |
| | Woodland Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 2004-1, Capital Projects, Spring Lake, 5.00%, 9/01/44 | | | 1,575,000 | | | | 1,780,490 | |
| | CFDNo. 2004-1, Capital Projects, Spring Lake, 5.00%, 9/01/48 | | | 1,755,000 | | | | 1,978,763 | |
| | Yorba Linda RDA Tax Allocation, Redevelopment Project, sub. lien, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 6.50%, 9/01/32 | | | 2,750,000 | | | | 3,066,140 | |
| | Yucaipa Special Tax, | | | | | | | | |
| | CFDNo. 98-1 Chapman Heights, Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/26 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,067,880 | |
| | CFDNo. 98-1 Chapman Heights, Refunding, 5.375%, 9/01/30 | | | 1,800,000 | | | | 1,930,968 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | 2,529,673,195 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | U.S. Territories 3.5% | | | | | | | | |
| | Guam 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
| | Government of Guam GO, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 7.00%, 11/15/39 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,125,000 | |
| | Guam Government Waterworks Authority Water and Wastewater System Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | 5.00%, 1/01/46 | | | 13,000,000 | | | | 14,387,750 | |
| | Pre-Refunded, 5.625%, 7/01/40 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,177,440 | |
| | Refunding, 5.00%, 7/01/36 | | | 1,755,000 | | | | 1,990,258 | |
| | Refunding, 5.00%, 7/01/37 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,695,720 | |
| | Guam Power Authority Revenue, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 10/01/40 | | | 4,750,000 | | | | 5,326,317 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | 32,702,485 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Northern Mariana Islands 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
| | Northern Mariana Islands Commonwealth Ports Authority Seaport Revenue, Senior Series A, 6.60%, 3/15/28 | | | 5,350,000 | | | | 5,380,923 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Puerto Rico 2.1% | | | | | | | | |
| | bPuerto Rico Electric Power Authority Power Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/29 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 8,000,000 | |
| | Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/42 | | | 6,000,000 | | | | 4,800,000 | |
| | Series A, 7.00%, 7/01/33 | | | 25,000,000 | | | | 20,812,500 | |
| | Series A, 6.75%, 7/01/36 | | | 11,735,000 | | | | 9,710,712 | |
| | | | |
| | |
38 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | U.S. Territories(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Puerto Rico(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | b Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Power Revenue, (continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Series A, 7.00%, 7/01/43 | | $ | 5,000,000 | | | $ | 4,162,500 | |
| | SeriesA-4, zero cpn., 7/01/19 | | | 1,601,766 | | | | 1,425,572 | |
| | Series B, zero cpn., 7/01/19 | | | 1,601,765 | | | | 1,425,571 | |
| | SeriesE-1, zero cpn., 1/01/21 | | | 1,768,493 | | | | 1,573,959 | |
| | SeriesE-2, zero cpn., 7/01/21 | | | 1,768,493 | | | | 1,573,959 | |
| | SeriesE-3, zero cpn., 1/01/22 | | | 600,000 | | | | 534,000 | |
| | SeriesE-4, zero cpn., 7/01/22 | | | 600,000 | | | | 534,000 | |
| | Puerto Rico Industrial Tourist Educational Medical and Environmental Control Facilities Financing
Authority Revenue, Cogeneration Facility, AES Puerto Rico Project, 6.625%, 6/01/26 | | | 4,500,000 | | | | 4,505,625 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | 59,058,398 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Total U.S. Territories | | | | | | | 97,141,806 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Total Municipal Bonds (Cost $2,346,220,064) | | | | | | | 2,626,815,001 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Total Municipal Bonds before Short Term Investments (Cost $2,346,220,064) | | | | | | | 2,626,815,001 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Short Term Investments 6.6% | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds 6.6% | | | | | | | | |
| | California 6.6% | | | | | | | | |
| | c California State GO, | | | | | | | | |
| | Floating, SeriesA-2, LOC Bank of Montreal, Daily VRDN and Put, 1.35%, 5/01/33 | | | 21,350,000 | | | | 21,350,000 | |
| | Kindergarten, Refunding, Series A1, LOC Citibank, Daily VRDN and Put, 1.18%, 5/01/34 | | | 30,955,000 | | | | 30,955,000 | |
| | Kindergarten, Refunding, Series A3, LOC State Street Bank & Trust Co., Daily VRDN and Put, 1.23%, 5/01/34 | | | 36,240,000 | | | | 36,240,000 | |
| | Kindergarten, Refunding, Series B3, LOC Citibank, Daily VRDN and Put, 1.23%, 5/01/34 | | | 2,540,000 | | | | 2,540,000 | |
| | c Irvine Ranch Water District GO, ID, Consolidated, Series B, LOC Bank of America, Daily VRDN and Put, 1.22%, 10/01/41 | | | 9,770,000 | | | | 9,770,000 | |
| | c Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Power System, Refunding, Series A, SubseriesA-4, SPA Bank of America, Daily VRDN and Put, 1.30%, 7/01/35 | | | 2,800,000 | | | | 2,800,000 | |
| | Power System, Refunding, Series B, SubseriesB-6, SPA TD Bank National Association, Daily VRDN and Put, 1.25%, 7/01/34 | | | 12,100,000 | | | | 12,100,000 | |
| | Water System, Refunding, Series B, SubseriesB-2, SPA Royal Bank of Canada, Daily VRDN and Put, 1.22%, 7/01/35 | | | 1,300,000 | | | | 1,300,000 | |
| | c The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Water Revenue, Refunding, SeriesB-3, SPA Citibank, Daily VRDN and Put, 1.24%, 7/01/35 | | | 30,900,000 | | | | 30,900,000 | |
| | c Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Sales Tax Revenue, 2000 Measure A, Refunding, Series D, SPA TD Bank National Association, Daily VRDN and Put, 1.35%, 4/01/36 | | | 7,600,000 | | | | 7,600,000 | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 39 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| |
| | | |
| | Short Term Investments (continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds (continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | California (continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | cUniversity of California Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | General, Refunding, Series A, Daily VRDN and Put, 1.25%, 5/15/48 | | $ | 7,650,000 | | | $ | 7,650,000 | |
| | General, Refunding, Series AL, Daily VRDN and Put, 1.21%, 5/15/48 | | | 23,885,000 | | | | 23,885,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Total Short Term Investments (Cost $187,090,000) | | | | | | | 187,090,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Total Investments (Cost $2,533,310,064) 100.0% | | | | | | | 2,813,905,001 | |
| | | |
| | Other Assets, less Liabilities (0.0)%† | | | | | | | (28,505 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Net Assets 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 2,813,876,496 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See Abbreviations on page 63.
†Rounds to less than 0.1% of net assets.
aSecurity purchased on a when-issued basis. See Note 1(b).
bSee Note 7 regarding defaulted securities.
cVariable rate demand notes (VRDNs) are obligations which contain a floating or variable interest rate adjustment formula and an unconditional right of demand to receive payment of the principal balance plus accrued interest at specified dates. Unless otherwise noted, the coupon rate is determined based on factors including supply and demand, underlying credit, tax treatment, and current short term rates. The coupon rate shown represents the rate at period end.
| | | | |
| | |
40 | | Annual Report | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
Financial Highlights
Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund
| | | | |
| | Year Ended May 31, 2019a |
| |
Class A | | | | |
| |
Per share operating performance (for a share outstanding throughout the year) | | | | |
| |
Net asset value, beginning of year | | | $10.74 | |
| | | | |
| |
Income from investment operationsb: | | | | |
| |
Net investment incomec | | | 0.23 | |
| |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) | | | 0.25 | |
| | | | |
| |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.48 | |
| | | | |
| |
Less distributions from: | | | | |
| |
Net investment income | | | (0.25 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Net asset value, end of year | | | $10.97 | |
| | | | |
| |
Total returnd | | | 4.53% | |
| |
Ratios to average net assetse | | | | |
| |
Expensesf | | | 0.93% | |
| |
Net investment income | | | 2.94% | |
| |
Supplemental data | | | | |
| |
Net assets, end of year (000’s) | | | $4,971 | |
| |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 3.46% | |
aFor the period September 10, 2018 (effective date) to May 31, 2019.
bThe amount shown for a share outstanding throughout the period may not correlate with the Statement of Operations for the period due to the timing of sales and repurchases of the Fund’s shares in relation to income earned and/or fluctuating fair value of the investments of the Fund.
cBased on average daily shares outstanding.
dTotal return does not reflect sales commissions or contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable , and is not annualized for periods less than one year.
eRatios are annualized for periods less than one year.
fBenefit of expense reduction rounds to less than 0.01%.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | Annual Report | | | 41 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Year Ended May 31, | | | | |
| | | | |
| | 2019 | | | 2018 | | | 2017 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
| |
| | | | | |
Class A1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Per share operating performance (for a share outstanding throughout the year) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of year | | | $10.79 | | | | $11.11 | | | | $11.44 | | | | $11.38 | | | | $11.47 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Income from investment operationsa: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net investment incomeb | | | 0.33 | | | | 0.34 | | | | 0.37 | | | | 0.40 | | | | 0.41 | |
| | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) | | | 0.19 | | | | (0.32) | | | | (0.32) | | | | 0.06 | | | | (0.08) | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.52 | | | | 0.02 | | | | 0.05 | | | | 0.46 | | | | 0.33 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net investment income | | | (0.35) | | | | (0.34) | | | | (0.38) | | | | (0.40) | | | | (0.42) | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Net asset value, end of year | | | $10.96 | | | | $10.79 | | | | $11.11 | | | | $11.44 | | | | $11.38 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Total returnc | | | 4.92% | | | | 0.23% | | | | 0.40% | | | | 4.12% | | | | 2.86% | |
| | | | | |
Ratios to average net assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Expenses before waiver and payments by affiliates | | | 0.78% | | | | 0.77% | | | | 0.72% | | | | 0.72% | | | | 0.72% | |
| | | | | |
Expenses net of waiver and payments by affiliates | | | 0.78% | d | | | 0.77% | | | | 0.72% | | | | 0.72% | | | | 0.71% | |
| | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.09% | | | | 3.08% | | | | 3.27% | | | | 3.55% | | | | 3.60% | |
| | | | | |
Supplemental data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s) | | | $190,548 | | | | $226,189 | | | | $267,442 | | | | $307,294 | | | | $293,580 | |
| | | | | |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 3.46% | | | | 9.19% | | | | 18.95% | | | | 4.50% | | | | 11.64% | |
aThe amount shown for a share outstanding throughout the period may not correlate with the Statement of Operations for the period due to the timing of sales and repurchases of the Fund’s shares in relation to income earned and/or fluctuating fair value of the investments of the Fund.
bBased on average daily shares outstanding.
cTotal return does not reflect sales commissions or contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable.
dBenefit of expense reduction rounds to less than 0.01%.
| | | | |
| | |
42 | | Annual Report | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended May 31, | |
| | 2019 | | | 2018a | |
| | |
Class R6 | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Per share operating performance (for a share outstanding throughout the year) | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net asset value, beginning of year | | | $10.79 | | | | $11.06 | |
| | |
Income from investment operationsb: | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net investment incomec | | | 0.35 | | | | 0.29 | |
| | |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) | | | 0.19 | | | | (0.26 | ) |
| | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.54 | | | | 0.03 | |
| | |
Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net investment income | | | (0.36 | ) | | | (0.30 | ) |
| | |
Net asset value, end of year | | | $10.97 | | | | $10.79 | |
| | |
Total returnd | | | 5.15% | | | | 0.25% | |
| | |
Ratios to average net assetse | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Expenses before waiver and payments by affiliates | | | 0.66% | | | | 0.66% | |
| | |
Expenses net of waiver and payments by affiliates | | | 0.65% | f | | | 0.64% | |
| | |
Net investment income | | | 3.22% | | | | 3.21% | |
| | |
Supplemental data | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s) | | | $3,253 | | | | $3,547 | |
| | |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 3.46% | | | | 9.19% | |
aFor the period August 1, 2017 (effective date) to May 31, 2018.
bThe amount shown for a share outstanding throughout the period may not correlate with the Statement of Operations for the period due to the timing of sales and repurchases of the Fund’s shares in relation to income earned and/or fluctuating fair value of the investments of the Fund.
cBased on average daily shares outstanding.
dTotal return is not annualized for periods less than one year.
eRatios are annualized for periods less than one year.
fBenefit of expense reduction rounds to less than 0.01%.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | Annual Report | | | 43 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | Year Ended May 31, | |
| | | |
| | 2019 | | | 2018 | | | 2017a | |
| | | |
Advisor Class | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Per share operating performance (for a share outstanding throughout the year) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Net asset value, beginning of year | | | $10.79 | | | | $11.12 | | | | $11.50 | |
| | | | |
| | | |
Income from investment operationsb: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Net investment incomec | | | 0.34 | | | | 0.35 | | | | 0.27 | |
| | | |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) | | | 0.20 | | | | (0.32 | ) | | | (0.38) | |
| | | | |
| | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.54 | | | | 0.03 | | | | (0.11) | |
| | | | |
| | | |
Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Net investment income | | | (0.36 | ) | | | (0.36 | ) | | | (0.27) | |
| | | | |
| | | |
Net asset value, end of year | | | $10.97 | | | | $10.79 | | | | $11.12 | |
| | | | |
| | | |
Total returnd | | | 5.12% | | | | 0.24% | | | | (0.91)% | |
| | | |
Ratios to average net assetse | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Expenses | | | 0.68%f | | | | 0.67% | | | | 0.62% | |
| | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.19% | | | | 3.18% | | | | 3.37% | |
| | | |
Supplemental data | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s) | | | $23,252 | | | | $23,573 | | | | $23,916 | |
| | | |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 3.46% | | | | 9.19% | | | | 18.95% | |
aFor the period September 15, 2016 (effective date) to May 31, 2017.
bThe amount shown for a share outstanding throughout the period may not correlate with the Statement of Operations for the period due to the timing of sales and repurchases of the Fund’s shares in relation to income earned and/or fluctuating fair value of the investments of the Fund.
cBased on average daily shares outstanding.
dTotal return is not annualized for periods less than one year.
eRatios are annualized for periods less than one year.
fBenefit of expense reduction rounds to less than 0.01%.
| | | | |
| | |
44 | | Annual Report | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
Statement of Investments, May 31, 2019
Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds 99.0% | | | | | | | | |
| | Tennessee 95.7% | | | | | | | | |
| | Chattanooga Electric System Revenue, The Electric Power Board of Chattanooga, Refunding, Series C, 5.00%, 9/01/40 | | $ | 2,750,000 | | | $ | 3,189,725 | |
| | Chattanooga Health Educational and Housing Facility Board Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Catholic Health Initiatives, Series D, 6.25%, 10/01/33 | | | 500,000 | | | | 503,555 | |
| | Student Housing, CDFI Phase I LLC, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Project, Refunding, 5.00%, 10/01/35 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,105,430 | |
| | Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority Hospital Revenue, Erlanger Health System, AGMC Insured,Pre-Refunded, 5.00%, 10/01/22 | | | 3,250,000 | | | | 3,286,239 | |
| | Clarksville Electric System Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Series A,Pre-Refunded, 5.00%, 9/01/34 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 2,088,780 | |
| | Series A,Pre-Refunded, 5.00%, 9/01/35 | | | 3,185,000 | | | | 3,326,382 | |
| | Clarksville Water Sewer and Gas Revenue,Pre-Refunded, 5.00%, 2/01/38 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,378,060 | |
| | Columbia Waterworks System Revenue, 5.00%, 12/01/32 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,234,810 | |
| | Gallatin Water and Sewer Revenue, Refunding and Improvement, 5.00%, 1/01/32 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,741,770 | |
| | Germantown GO, | | | | | | | | |
| | 4.00%, 8/01/43 | | | 2,330,000 | | | | 2,551,746 | |
| | 4.00%, 8/01/45 | | | 2,525,000 | | | | 2,761,794 | |
| | Harpeth Valley Utilities District of Davidson and Williamson Counties Revenue, Utilities, 5.00%, 9/01/44 | | | 4,400,000 | | | | 4,980,492 | |
| | Jackson Hospital Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Jackson-Madison County General Hospital, Refunding, 5.00%, 4/01/36 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,470,080 | |
| | Jackson-Madison County General Hospital, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 4/01/41 | | | 2,370,000 | | | | 2,738,511 | |
| | Johnson City Health and Educational Facilities Board Hospital Revenue, Johnson City Medical Center Hospital, Improvement, Series C, NATL Insured,Pre-Refunded, 5.125%, 7/01/25 | | | 75,000 | | | | 76,271 | |
| | Kingsport IDB, MFHR, Model City Apartments Project, GNMA Secured, 5.50%, 7/20/39 | | | 2,995,000 | | | | 3,000,091 | |
| | Knox County First Utility District Water and Sewer Revenue,Pre-Refunded, 5.00%, 12/01/32 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,122,260 | |
| | Knox County Health Educational and Housing Facility Board Hospital Revenue, Covenant Health, Refunding, Series A, 5.00%, 1/01/42 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,751,900 | |
| | Knox County Health Educational and Housing Facility Board Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | University Health System Inc., Refunding, 5.00%, 4/01/36 | | | 2,250,000 | | | | 2,528,505 | |
| | University Health System Inc., Refunding, 5.00%, 9/01/47 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,470,200 | |
| | Knox-Chapman Utility District of Knox County Water and Sewer Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Pre-Refunded, 5.25%, 1/01/36 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,590,120 | |
| | Refunding and Improvement, 4.00%, 1/01/40 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,202,560 | |
| | Knoxville Wastewater System Revenue, Refunding, Series A, 4.00%, 4/01/42 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,258,950 | |
| | Lawrenceburg PBA, GO, Electric System, Refunding, AMBAC Insured, 5.00%, 7/01/22 | | | 2,390,000 | | | | 2,504,099 | |
| | Loudon Water and Sewer Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Exempt Facility, Series A, 4.00%, 3/01/28 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,046,930 | |
| | Exempt Facility, Series A, 5.00%, 3/01/32 | | | 1,300,000 | | | | 1,388,127 | |
| | Manchester GO, Refunding, AGMC Insured, 5.00%, 6/01/38 | | | 2,045,000 | | | | 2,110,665 | |
| | Maury County GO, Public Improvement, Refunding, 4.00%, 4/01/34 | | | 1,775,000 | | | | 1,945,791 | |
| | Memphis Electric System Revenue, 5.00%, 12/01/34 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,155,580 | |
| | Memphis Gas System Revenue, 4.00%, 12/01/36 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,113,340 | |
| | Memphis GO, General Improvement, Refunding, 5.00%, 5/01/36 | | | 4,135,000 | | | | 4,379,006 | |
| | Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority Airport Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Refunding, Series B, 5.75%, 7/01/25 | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,609,800 | |
| | Refunding, Series D, 5.00%, 7/01/25 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,207,990 | |
| | Series A, AGMC Insured, 5.00%, 7/01/35 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,166,200 | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 45 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Tennessee(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority Airport Revenue, (continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Series A, AGMC Insured, 5.00%, 7/01/39 | | $ | 2,565,000 | | | $ | 2,648,055 | |
| | Memphis-Shelby County Sports Authority Inc. Revenue, Memphis Arena Project, Refunding, Series B, 5.375%, 11/01/29 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,078,050 | |
| | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County Electric System Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Series A, 5.00%, 5/15/36 | | | 3,500,000 | | | | 3,725,260 | |
| | Series A, 5.00%, 5/15/39 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,546,360 | |
| | Series A, 5.00%, 5/15/42 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,575,310 | |
| | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County Health and Educational Facilities Board Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Vanderbilt University, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 5.50%, 10/01/29 | | | 3,500,000 | | | | 3,546,591 | |
| | Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/40 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,738,000 | |
| | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County Sports Authority Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Public Improvement, Ballpark Project, Series A, 5.00%, 8/01/38 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,344,520 | |
| | Public Improvement, Ballpark Project, Series A, 5.00%, 8/01/43 | | | 2,075,000 | | | | 2,306,300 | |
| | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County Water and Sewer Revenue, Green Bonds, Subordinate, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/46 | | | 6,855,000 | | | | 8,155,051 | |
| | Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority Revenue, Improvement, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/45 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,550,720 | |
| | Pigeon Forge IDB Revenue, Public Facility, 5.00%, 6/01/34 | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,327,938 | |
| | Rutherford County Health and Educational Facilities Board Revenue, Ascension Health Senior Credit Group, Series C, 5.00%, 11/15/40 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 10,143,100 | |
| | Shelby County Health Educational and Housing Facility Board Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Baptist Memorial Health Care, Series A, 5.00%, 9/01/19 | | | 3,015,000 | | | | 3,038,125 | |
| | Educational Facilities, Rhodes College, 5.00%, 8/01/45 | | | 1,700,000 | | | | 1,964,163 | |
| | Educational Facilities, Rhodes College,Pre-Refunded, 5.50%, 8/01/40 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,413,050 | |
| | Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare, Series A, 5.00%, 5/01/36 | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,741,120 | |
| | Rhodes College, Refunding, 4.00%, 8/01/40 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,280,800 | |
| | South Blount County Utility District Waterworks Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Improvement, AGMC Insured,Pre-Refunded, 5.00%, 12/01/33 | | | 315,000 | | | | 320,459 | |
| | Improvement, AGMC Insured,Pre-Refunded, 5.25%, 12/01/39 | | | 1,040,000 | | | | 1,059,292 | |
| | Refunding and Improvement, AGMC Insured, 5.00%, 12/01/33 | | | 685,000 | | | | 696,159 | |
| | Refunding and Improvement, AGMC Insured, 5.25%, 12/01/39 | | | 2,270,000 | | | | 2,310,179 | |
| | Tennessee HDA Residential Finance Program Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Issue 1C, 4.00%, 7/01/43 | | | 1,505,000 | | | | 1,534,001 | |
| | Issue 2, 3.85%, 7/01/42 | | | 1,985,000 | | | | 2,084,389 | |
| | Issue 3, 3.65%, 7/01/47 | | | 995,000 | | | | 1,032,571 | |
| | Issue 4, Refunding, 4.00%, 7/01/43 | | | 1,980,000 | | | | 2,105,314 | |
| | Tennessee HDA Revenue, Homeownership Program, Series 2C, 3.80%, 7/01/43 | | | 1,165,000 | | | | 1,197,329 | |
| | Tennessee State School Bond Authority Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Higher Educational Facilities Second Program, Refunding, Series B, 5.00%, 11/01/40 | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 11,657,700 | |
| | Higher Educational Facilities Second Program, Refunding, Series B, 5.00%, 11/01/45 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 5,802,100 | |
| | West Knox Utility District Knox County Water and Sewer Revenue, Refunding and Improvement, 5.00%, 6/01/41 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,132,550 | |
| | West Wilson Utility District of Wilson County Water Revenue, | | | | | | | | |
| | Pre-Refunded, 5.00%, 6/01/33 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3,202,830 | |
| | Refunding and Improvement, 5.00%, 6/01/40 | | | 1,545,000 | | | | 1,791,273 | |
| | | | |
| | |
46 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal Amount | | | Value | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Tennessee(continued) | | | | | | | | |
| | Wilson County GO, School, Series A, 4.00%, 4/01/42 | | $ | 5,000,000 | | | $ | 5,364,200 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | 212,398,618 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | U.S. Territories 3.3% | | | | | | | | |
| | Guam 1.5% | | | | | | | | |
| | Guam Government Limited Obligation Revenue, Section 30, Series A,Pre-Refunded, 5.625%, 12/01/29 | | | 3,205,000 | | | | 3,272,401 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Puerto Rico 1.8% | | | | | | | | |
a | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Power Revenue, Series XX, 5.25%, 7/01/40 | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 4,012,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Total U.S. Territories | | | | | | | 7,284,901 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Total Municipal Bonds before Short Term Investments (Cost $210,676,238) | | | | | | | 219,683,519 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Short Term Investments (Cost $305,000) 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Municipal Bonds 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
| | Tennessee 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
b | | Shelby County Health Educational and Housing Facility Board Revenue, Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare, Refunding, Series A, AGMC Insured, SPA US Bank National Association, Daily VRDN and Put, 2.20%, 6/01/42 | | | 305,000 | | | | 305,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Total Investments (Cost $210,981,238) 99.1% | | | | | | | 219,988,519 | |
| | Other Assets, less Liabilities 0.9% | | | | | | | 2,035,610 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | Net Assets 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 222,024,129 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See Abbreviations on page 63.
aSee Note 7 regarding defaulted securities.
bVariable rate demand notes (VRDNs) are obligations which contain a floating or variable interest rate adjustment formula and an unconditional right of demand to receive payment of the principal balance plus accrued interest at specified dates. Unless otherwise noted, the coupon rate is determined based on factors including supply and demand, underlying credit, tax treatment, and current short term rates. The coupon rate shown represents the rate at period end.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | Annual Report | | | 47 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
May 31, 2019
| | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund | |
| |
|
Assets: | |
Investments in securities: | |
Cost - Unaffiliated issuers | | $ | 2,533,310,064 | | | $ | 210,981,238 | |
| | | | |
Value - Unaffiliated issuers | | $ | 2,813,905,001 | | | $ | 219,988,519 | |
Cash | | | 348,716 | | | | 20,811 | |
Receivables: | | | | | | | | |
Capital shares sold | | | 9,485,055 | | | | 4,521 | |
Interest | | | 29,925,576 | | | | 2,652,938 | |
Other assets | | | 2,003 | | | | 179 | |
| | | | |
Total assets | | | 2,853,666,351 | | | | 222,666,968 | |
| | | | |
Liabilities: | |
Payables: | |
Investment securities purchased | | | 31,454,924 | | | | — | |
Capital shares redeemed | | | 5,014,762 | | | | 404,089 | |
Management fees | | | 1,072,172 | | | | 105,032 | |
Distribution fees | | | 310,228 | | | | 17,259 | |
Transfer agent fees | | | 288,905 | | | | 20,680 | |
Professional fees | | | 80,780 | | | | 39,937 | |
Distributions to shareholders | | | 1,457,550 | | | | 38,974 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 110,534 | | | | 16,868 | |
| | | | |
| | |
Total liabilities | | | 39,789,855 | | | | 642,839 | |
| | | | |
| | |
Net assets, at value | | $ | 2,813,876,496 | | | $ | 222,024,129 | |
| | | | |
|
Net assets consist of: | |
Paid-in capital | | $ | 2,604,680,625 | | | $ | 228,533,938 | |
Total distributable earnings (loss) | | | 209,195,871 | | | | (6,509,809 | ) |
| | | | |
| | |
Net assets, at value | | $ | 2,813,876,496 | | | $ | 222,024,129 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | |
48 | | Annual Report | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statements of Assets and Liabilities(continued)
May 31, 2019
| | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund | |
Class A: | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, at value | | | $ 244,195,579 | | | | $ 4,971,023 | |
| | | | |
Shares outstanding | | | 21,995,769 | | | | 453,112 | |
| | | | |
Net asset value per sharea | | | $11.10 | | | | $10.97 | |
| | | | |
Maximum offering price per share (net asset value per share ÷ 96.25%) | | | $11.53 | | | | $11.40 | |
| | | | |
Class A1: | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, at value | | | $1,386,290,797 | | | | $190,548,342 | |
| | | | |
Shares outstanding | | | 125,112,489 | | | | 17,380,868 | |
| | | | |
Net asset value per sharea | | | $11.08 | | | | $10.96 | |
| | | | |
Maximum offering price per share (net asset value per share ÷ 96.25%) | | | $11.51 | | | | $11.39 | |
| | | | |
Class C: | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, at value | | | $ 272,185,877 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Shares outstanding | | | 24,374,268 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net asset value and maximum offering price per sharea | | | $11.17 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Class R6: | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, at value | | | $ 21,214,447 | | | | $ 3,252,660 | |
| | | | |
Shares outstanding | | | 1,907,975 | | | | 296,632 | |
| | | | |
Net asset value and maximum offering price per share | | | $11.12 | | | | $10.97 | |
| | | | |
Advisor Class: | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, at value | | | $ 889,989,796 | | | | $ 23,252,104 | |
| | | | |
Shares outstanding | | | 80,114,875 | | | | 2,119,366 | |
| | | | |
Net asset value and maximum offering price per share | | | $11.11 | | | | $10.97 | |
| | | | |
aRedemption price is equal to net asset value less contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | Annual Report | | | 49 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statements of Operations
for the year ended May 31, 2019
| | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund | |
Investment income: | | | | | |
Interest: | | | | | | | | |
Unaffiliated issuers | | | $111,123,796 | | | | $ 9,051,014 | |
| | | | |
| |
Expenses: | | | | | |
Management fees (Note 3a) | | | 11,645,785 | | | | 1,294,284 | |
Distribution fees: (Note 3c) | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 218,558 | | | | 4,710 | |
Class A1 | | | 1,364,738 | | | | 204,992 | |
Class C | | | 1,839,376 | | | | — | |
Transfer agent fees: (Note 3e) | | | | | |
Class A | | | 55,453 | | | | 1,175 | |
Class A1 | | | 864,237 | | | | 127,804 | |
Class C | | | 179,192 | | | | — | |
Class R6 | | | 7,742 | | | | 1,389 | |
Advisor Class | | | 494,229 | | | | 14,675 | |
Custodian fees (Note 4) | | | 21,453 | | | | 1,959 | |
Reports to shareholders | | | 64,180 | | | | 15,786 | |
Registration and filing fees | | | 72,140 | | | | 14,376 | |
Professional fees | | | 352,129 | | | | 71,355 | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 79,358 | | | | 7,705 | |
Federal and state income taxes | | | 824,152 | | | | — | |
Other | | | 238,610 | | | | 40,474 | |
| | | | |
| | |
Total expenses | | | 18,321,332 | | | | 1,800,684 | |
Expense reductions (Note 4) | | | (18,451 | ) | | | (2,213 | ) |
Expenses waived/paid by affiliates (Note 3f) | | | (2,612 | ) | | | (367 | ) |
| | | | |
| | |
Net expenses | | | 18,300,269 | | | | 1,798,104 | |
| | | | |
| | |
Net investment income | | | 92,823,527 | | | | 7,252,910 | |
| | | | |
| | |
Realized and unrealized gains (losses): | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) from: | | | | | | | | |
Investments: | | | | | | | | |
Unaffiliated issuers | | | 6,194,069 | | | | (10,168 | ) |
| | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | | | | | |
Investments: | | | | | | | | |
Unaffiliated issuers | | | 89,825,327 | | | | 3,715,864 | |
| | | | |
| | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 96,019,396 | | | | 3,705,696 | |
| | | | |
| | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | | | $188,842,923 | | | | $10,958,606 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | |
50 | | Annual Report | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California | | | Franklin Tennessee | |
| | High Yield Municipal Fund | | | Municipal Bond Fund | |
| | | | |
| | Year Ended May 31, | | | Year Ended May 31, | |
| | | | |
| | 2019 | | | 2018 | | | 2019 | | | 2018 | |
| |
| | | | |
Increase (decrease) in net assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | $ 92,823,527 | | | | $ 89,058,606 | | | | $ 7,252,910 | | | | $ 8,454,430 | |
Net realized gain (loss) | | | 6,194,069 | | | | (18,909,793 | ) | | | (10,168 | ) | | | (7,805,055 | ) |
| | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | 89,825,327 | | | | (23,391,645 | ) | | | 3,715,864 | | | | (238,733 | ) |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | | | 188,842,923 | | | | 46,757,168 | | | | 10,958,606 | | | | 410,642 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Distributions to shareholders: (Note 1d) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (3,188,725 | ) | | | — | | | | (63,310 | ) | | | — | |
Class A1 | | | (52,065,730 | ) | | | (50,788,123 | ) | | | (6,647,714 | ) | | | (7,869,559 | ) |
Class C | | | (9,134,274 | ) | | | (10,640,983 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Class R6 | | | (670,331 | ) | | | (231,068 | ) | | | (114,742 | ) | | | (67,251 | ) |
Advisor Class | | | (30,399,177 | ) | | | (27,969,229 | ) | | | (785,947 | ) | | | (738,299 | ) |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Total distributions to shareholders | | | (95,458,237 | ) | | | (89,629,403 | ) | | | (7,611,713 | ) | | | (8,675,109 | ) |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Capital share transactions: (Note 2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 235,411,225 | | | | — | | | | 4,860,314 | | | | — | |
Class A1 | | | (38,267,367 | ) | | | 24,581,413 | | | | (38,480,111 | ) | | | (33,708,991 | ) |
Class C | | | (62,677,849 | ) | | | (25,356,244 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Class R6 | | | 7,429,963 | | | | 13,057,844 | | | | (340,291 | ) | | | 3,596,199 | |
Advisor Class | | | 112,045,938 | | | | 40,427,510 | | | | (671,740 | ) | | | 328,619 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Total capital share transactions | | | 253,941,910 | | | | 52,710,523 | | | | (34,631,828 | ) | | | (29,784,173 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | | 347,326,596 | | | | 9,838,288 | | | | (31,284,935 | ) | | | (38,048,640 | ) |
| | | | |
Net assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of year | | | 2,466,549,900 | | | | 2,456,711,612 | | | | 253,309,064 | | | | 291,357,704 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
End of year (Note 1d) | | | $2,813,876,496 | | | | $2,466,549,900 | | | | $222,024,129 | | | | $253,309,064 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | Annual Report | | | 51 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
Notes to Financial Statements
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Franklin Municipal Securities Trust (Trust) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act) as anopen-end management investment company, consisting of two separate funds (Funds) and applies the specialized accounting and reporting guidance in U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP). The classes of shares offered within each of the Funds are indicated below. Beginning on October 19, 2018, Class C shares automatically convert to Class A shares after they have been held for 10 years. Each class of shares may differ by its initial sales load, contingent deferred sales charges, voting rights on matters affecting a single class, its exchange privilege and fees due to differing arrangements for distribution and transfer agent fees.
Effective September 10, 2018, Class A shares were renamed Class A1, and these Funds began offering a new class of shares, Class A. Class A1 shares are only offered to existing Class A1 shareholders.
Class A, Class A1, Class R6 & Advisor Class
Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund
Class A, Class A1, Class C, Class R6 & Advisor Class
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund
The following summarizes the Funds’ significant accounting policies.
a. Financial Instrument Valuation
The Funds’ investments in financial instruments are carried at fair value daily. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Funds calculate the net asset value (NAV) per share each business day as of 4 p.m. Eastern time or the regularly scheduled close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), whichever is earlier. Under compliance policies and procedures approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the Board), the Funds’ administrator has responsibility for oversight of valuation, including leading the cross-functional Valuation Committee (VC). The Funds may utilize independent pricing services, quotations from securities and financial instrument dealers, and other market sources to determine fair value.
Debt securities generally trade in theover-the-counter market rather than on a securities exchange. The Funds’ pricing services use multiple valuation techniques to determine fair value. In instances where sufficient market activity exists, the pricing services may utilize a market-based approach through which quotes from market makers are used to determine fair value. In instances where sufficient market activity may not exist or is limited, the pricing services also utilize proprietary valuation models which may consider market characteristics such as benchmark yield curves, credit spreads, estimated default rates, anticipated market interest rate volatility, coupon rates, anticipated timing of principal repayments, underlying collateral, and other unique security features in order to estimate the relevant cash flows, which are then discounted to calculate the fair value.
The Funds have procedures to determine the fair value of financial instruments for which market prices are not reliable or readily available. Under these procedures, the Funds primarily employ a market-based approach which may use related or comparable assets or liabilities, recent transactions, market multiples, book values, and other relevant information for the investment to determine the fair value of the investment. An income-based valuation approach may also be used in which the anticipated future cash flows of the investment are discounted to calculate fair value. Discounts may also be applied due to the nature or duration of any restrictions on the disposition of the investments. Due to the inherent uncertainty of valuations of such investments, the fair values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had an active market existed.
b. Securities Purchased on a When-Issued Basis
Certain or all Funds purchase securities on a when-issued basis, with payment and delivery scheduled for a future date. These transactions are subject to market fluctuations and are subject to the risk that the value at delivery may be more or less than the trade date purchase price. Although the Funds will generally purchase these securities with the intention of holding the securities, they may sell the securities before the settlement date. Sufficient assets have been segregated for these securities.
c. Income Taxes
It is each Fund’s policy to qualify as a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code. Each Fund intends to distribute to shareholders substantially all of its
| | | | |
| | |
52 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
income and net realized gains to relieve it from federal income and excise taxes. As a result, no provision for U.S. federal income taxes is required.
Each Fund may recognize an income tax liability related to its uncertain tax positions under U.S. GAAP when the uncertain tax position has a less than 50% probability that it will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities based on its technical merits. As of May 31, 2019, each Fund has determined that no tax liability is required in its financial statements related to uncertain tax positions for any open tax years (or expected to be taken in future tax years). Open tax years are those that remain subject to examination and are based on the statute of limitations in each jurisdiction in which the Fund invests.
d. Security Transactions, Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions
Security transactions are accounted for on trade date. Realized gains and losses on security transactions are determined on a specific identification basis. Interest income and estimated expenses are accrued daily. Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on debt securities are included in interest income. Dividends from net investment income are normally declared daily; these dividends may be reinvested or paid monthly to shareholders. Distributions from realized capital gains and other distributions, if any, are recorded on theex-dividend date. Distributable earnings are determined according to income tax regulations (tax basis) and may differ from earnings recorded in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts to reflect their tax character. These reclassifications have no impact on net assets or the results of operations. Temporary differences are not reclassified, as they may reverse in subsequent periods.*
Common expenses incurred by the Trust are allocated among the Funds based on the ratio of net assets of each Fund to the combined net assets of the Trust or based on the ratio of number of shareholders of each Fund to the combined number of shareholders of the Trust. Fund specific expenses are charged directly to the Fund that incurred the expense.
Realized and unrealized gains and losses and net investment income, excluding class specific expenses, are allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the relative proportion of
net assets of each class. Differences in per share distributions by class are generally due to differences in class specific expenses.
e. Insurance
The scheduled payments of interest and principal for each insured municipal security in the Trust are insured by either a new issue insurance policy or a secondary insurance policy. Some municipal securities in the Funds are secured by collateral guaranteed by an agency of the U.S. government. Depending on the type of coverage, premiums for insurance are either added to the cost basis of the security or paid by a third party.
Insurance companies typically insure municipal bonds that tend to be of very high quality, with the majority of underlying municipal bonds rated A or better. However, an event involving an insurer could have an adverse effect on the value of the securities insured by that insurance company. There can be no assurance the insurer will be able to fulfill its obligations under the terms of the policy.
f. Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
g. Guarantees and Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified by the Trust against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Trust, on behalf of the Funds, enters into contracts with service providers that contain general indemnification clauses. The Trust’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Trust that have not yet occurred. Currently, the Trust expects the risk of loss to be remote.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 53 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies(continued)
*Effective during the current reporting period, it is no longer required to present certain line items in the Statements of Changes in Net Assets. The below prior period amounts affected by this change are shown as they were in the prior year Statements of Changes in Net Assets.
For the year ended May 31, 2018, distributions to shareholders were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund |
| | |
Distributions from net investment income: | | | | | | | | |
Class A1 | | | $(50,788,123 | ) | | $ | (7,869,559 | ) |
Class C | | | (10,640,983 | ) | | | — | |
Class R6 | | | (231,068 | ) | | | (67,251 | ) |
Advisor Class | | | (27,969,229 | ) | | | (738,299 | ) |
For the year ended May 31, 2018, undistributed net investment income included in net assets were as follows:
| | | | |
Fund | | Undistributed net investment income | |
| |
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | | $5,459,356 | |
Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund | | | $ 384,309 | |
2. Shares of Beneficial Interest
At May 31, 2019, there were an unlimited number of shares authorized (without par value). Transactions in the Funds’ shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund | |
| | | | |
| | Shares | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
| | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Year ended May 31, 2019a | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares soldb | | | 29,417,854 | | | $ | 314,485,980 | | | | 466,737 | | | $ | 5,006,589 | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of distributions | | | 280,016 | | | | 3,023,252 | | | | 5,832 | | | | 63,234 | |
Shares redeemed | | | (7,702,101 | ) | | | (82,098,007 | ) | | | (19,457 | ) | | | (209,509 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | 21,995,769 | | | $ | 235,411,225 | | | | 453,112 | | | $ | 4,860,314 | |
| | | | |
| | |
54 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Franklin California | | | Franklin Tennessee | |
| | | | High Yield Municipal Fund | | | Municipal Bond Fund | |
| | | | | |
| | | | Shares | | | Amount | | Shares | | | Amount | |
| | | | | |
Class A1 Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended May 31, 2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | | | 16,558,804 | | | | $ 176,930,518 | | | | 540,106 | | | | $ 5,816,998 | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of distributions | | | 4,123,926 | | | | 44,141,197 | | | | 575,127 | | | | 6,190,781 | |
Shares redeemed | | | | | (24,345,818 | ) | | | (259,339,082) | | | | (4,706,541 | ) | | | (50,487,890) | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | | | (3,663,088 | ) | | | $ (38,267,367) | | | | (3,591,308 | ) | | | $(38,480,111) | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Year ended May 31, 2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | | | 26,030,871 | | | | $ 280,746,944 | | | | 1,389,282 | | | | $ 15,203,932 | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of distributions | | | 4,002,097 | | | | 43,080,415 | | | | 658,740 | | | | 7,190,107 | |
Shares redeemed | | | | | (27,788,407 | ) | | | (299,245,946) | | | | (5,140,500 | ) | | | (56,103,030) | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | | | 2,244,561 | | | | $ 24,581,413 | | | | (3,092,478 | ) | | | $(33,708,991) | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Class C Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Year ended May 31, 2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | | | 4,690,276 | | | | $ 50,662,807 | | | | | | | | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of distributions | | | 714,904 | | | | 7,709,480 | | | | | | | | | |
Shares redeemedb | | | | | (11,360,194 | ) | | | (121,050,136) | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | | | (5,955,014 | ) | | | $ (62,677,849) | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Year ended May 31, 2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | | | 3,430,130 | | | | $ 37,350,507 | | | | | | | | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of distributions | | | 830,255 | | | | 9,004,952 | | | | | | | | | |
Shares redeemed | | | | | (6,608,373 | ) | | | (71,711,703) | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | | | (2,347,988 | ) | | | $ (25,356,244) | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Class R6 Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Year ended May 31, 2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | | | 1,067,116 | | | | $ 11,383,693 | | | | 63,398 | | | | $ 680,463 | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of distributions | | | 55,815 | | | | 599,865 | | | | 10,657 | | | | 114,741 | |
Shares redeemed | | | | | (426,215 | ) | | | (4,553,595) | | | | (106,228 | ) | | | (1,135,495) | |
| | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | | | 696,716 | | | | $ 7,429,963 | | | | (32,173 | ) | | | $ (340,291) | |
| �� | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Year ended May 31, 2018c | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | | | 1,314,547 | | | | $ 14,172,999 | | | | 391,528 | | | | $ 4,279,442 | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of distributions | | | 21,519 | | | | 230,975 | | | | 6,203 | | | | 67,184 | |
Shares redeemed | | | | | (124,807 | ) | | | (1,346,130) | | | | (68,926 | ) | | | (750,427) | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | | | 1,211,259 | | | | $ 13,057,844 | | | | 328,805 | | | | $ 3,596,199 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 55 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2. Shares of Beneficial Interest(continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund | |
| | | | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
| | | | |
Advisor Class Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Year ended May 31, 2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 27,870,236 | | | | $ 298,680,447 | | | | 683,998 | | | | $ 7,361,521 | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of distributions | | | 2,061,371 | | | | 22,137,099 | | | | 65,070 | | | | 700,827 | |
Shares redeemed | | | (19,578,620 | ) | | | (208,771,608 | ) | | | (814,132 | ) | | | (8,734,088) | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | 10,352,987 | | | | $ 112,045,938 | | | | (65,064 | ) | | | $ (671,740) | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Year ended May 31, 2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 19,221,729 | | | | $ 207,851,211 | | | | 992,775 | | | | $ 10,844,278 | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of distributions | | | 1,843,679 | | | | 19,892,413 | | | | 66,806 | | | | 729,550 | |
Shares redeemed | | | (17,376,783 | ) | | | (187,316,114 | ) | | | (1,025,984 | ) | | | (11,245,209) | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | 3,688,625 | | | | $ 40,427,510 | | | | 33,597 | | | | $ 328,619 | |
| | | | |
aFor the period September 10, 2018 (effective date) to May 31, 2019.
bMay include a portion of Class C shares that were automatically converted to Class A.
cFor the period August 1, 2017 (effective date) to May 31, 2018.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
Franklin Resources, Inc. is the holding company for various subsidiaries that together are referred to as Franklin Templeton. Certain officers and trustees of the Trust are also officers and/or directors of the following subsidiaries:
| | |
| |
Subsidiary | | Affiliation |
| |
Franklin Advisers, Inc. (Advisers) | | Investment manager |
| |
Franklin Templeton Services, LLC (FT Services) | | Administrative manager |
| |
Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc. (Distributors) | | Principal underwriter |
| |
Franklin Templeton Investor Services, LLC (Investor Services) | | Transfer agent |
| | | | |
| | |
56 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
a. Management Fees
The Funds pay an investment management fee to Advisers based on the average daily net assets of each of the Funds as follows:
| | |
Annualized Fee Rate | | Net Assets |
| |
0.625% | | Up to and including $100 million |
| |
0.500% | | Over $100 million, up to and including $250 million |
| |
0.450% | | Over $250 million, up to and including $7.5 billion |
| |
0.440% | | Over $7.5 billion, up to and including $10 billion |
| |
0.430% | | Over $10 billion, up to and including $12.5 billion |
| |
0.420% | | Over $12.5 billion, up to and including $15 billion |
| |
0.400% | | Over $15 billion, up to and including $17.5 billion |
| |
0.380% | | Over $17.5 billion, up to and including $20 billion |
| |
0.360% | | In excess of $20 billion |
For the year ended May 31, 2019, each Fund’s gross effective investment management fee rate based on average daily net assets was as follows:
| | |
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund |
| |
0.460% | | 0.554% |
b. Administrative Fees
Under an agreement with Advisers, FT Services provides administrative services to the Funds. The fee is paid by Advisers based on each of the Funds’ average daily net assets, and is not an additional expense of the Funds.
c. Distribution Fees
The Board has adopted distribution plans for each share class, with the exception of Class R6 and Advisor Class shares, pursuant to Rule12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the Funds’ Class A and A1 reimbursement distribution plans, the Funds reimburse Distributors for costs incurred in connection with the servicing, sale and distribution of each Fund’s shares up to the maximum annual plan rate. Under the Class A and A1 reimbursement distribution plans, costs exceeding the maximum for the current plan year cannot be reimbursed in subsequent periods. In addition, under the Funds’ Class C compensation distribution plans, Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund pays Distributors for costs incurred in connection with the servicing, sale and distribution of each Fund’s shares up to the maximum annual plan rate. The plan year, for purposes of monitoring compliance with the maximum annual plan rates, is February 1 through January 31 for each Fund.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 57 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3. Transactions with Affiliates (continued)
c. Distribution Fees(continued)
The maximum annual plan rates, based on the average daily net assets, for each class, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund | |
Reimbursement Plans: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | |
Class A1 | | | 0.15% | | | | 0.15% | |
Compensation Plans: | | | | | | | | |
Class C | | | 0.65% | | | | — | |
Distributors has agreed to limit the current rate to 0.10% per year for Class A1.
d. Sales Charges/Underwriting Agreements
Front-end sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) do not represent expenses of the Funds. These charges are deducted from the proceeds of sales of fund shares prior to investment or from redemption proceeds prior to remittance, as applicable. Distributors has advised the Funds of the following commission transactions related to the sales and redemptions of the Funds’ shares for the year:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund | |
| | |
Sales charges retained net of commissions paid to unaffiliated brokers/dealers | | | $ 86,238 | | | | $7,124 | |
| | |
CDSC retained | | | $132,764 | | | | $1,624 | |
Effective March 1, 2019, certainfront-end sales charges on Class A and A1 shares, if any, were lowered. Further details are disclosed in the Funds’ Prospectus.
e. Transfer Agent Fees
Each class of shares pays transfer agent fees to Investor Services for its performance of shareholder servicing obligations. The fees are based on an annualized asset based fee of 0.02% plus a transaction based fee. In addition, each class reimburses Investor Services for out of pocket expenses incurred and, except for Class R6, reimburses shareholder servicing fees paid to third parties. These fees are allocated daily based upon their relative proportion of such classes’ aggregate net assets. Class R6 pays Investor Services transfer agent fees specific to that class.
| | | | |
| | |
58 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the year ended May 31, 2019, the Funds paid transfer agent fees as noted in the Statements of Operations of which the following amounts were retained by Investor Services:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund | |
| |
| | |
Transfer agent fees | | | $692,870 | | | | $62,976 | |
f. Waiver and Expense Reimbursements
Investor Services has contractually agreed in advance to waive or limit its fees so that the Class R6 transfer agent fees do not exceed 0.03% based on the average net assets of the class until September 30, 2019.
g. Interfund Transactions
Certain or all Funds engaged in purchases and sales of investments with funds or other accounts that have common investment managers (or affiliated investment managers), directors, trustees or officers. These purchases and sales for the year ended May 31, 2019, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund | |
| |
| | |
Purchases | | | $137,665,000 | | | | $13,310,000 | |
Sales | | | $ 88,910,000 | | | | $ 1,700,000 | |
4. Expense Offset Arrangement
The Funds have entered into an arrangement with their custodian whereby credits realized as a result of uninvested cash balances are used to reduce a portion of the Funds’ custodian expenses. During the year ended May 31, 2019, the custodian fees were reduced as noted in the Statements of Operations.
5. Income Taxes
For tax purposes, capital losses may be carried over to offset future capital gains. Capital loss carryforwards with no expiration, if any, must be fully utilized before those losses with expiration dates.
At May 31, 2019, the capital loss carryforwards were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund | |
| |
| | |
Capital loss carryforwards not subject to expiration: | | | | | | | | |
Short term | | | $49,930,059 | | | | $ 4,836,291 | |
Long term | | | 22,000,893 | | | | 10,278,528 | |
| | | | |
| | |
Total capital loss carryforwards | | | $71,930,952 | | | | $15,114,819 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 59 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
5. Income Taxes(continued)
During the year ended May 31, 2019, Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund utilized $6,601,091 of capital loss carryforwards.
On May 31, 2019, Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund had expired capital loss carryforwards of $21,604,912, which were reclassified topaid-in capital.
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended May 31, 2019 and 2018, was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California | | Franklin Tennessee |
| | High Yield Municipal Fund | | Municipal Bond Fund |
| | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | | | |
Distributions paid from tax exempt income | | $95,458,237 | | $89,629,403 | | $7,611,713 | | $8,675,109 |
At May 31, 2019, the cost of investments, net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and undistributed tax exempt income for income tax purposes were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund | |
| |
| | |
Cost of investments | | | $2,535,735,219 | | | | $211,564,059 | |
| | | | |
| | |
Unrealized appreciation | | | $ 292,978,903 | | | | $ 9,783,822 | |
Unrealized depreciation | | | (14,809,121 | ) | | | (1,359,362) | |
| | | | |
| | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | $ 278,169,782 | | | | $ 8,424,460 | |
| | | | |
| | |
Distributable earnings: | | | | | | | | |
Undistributed tax exempt income | | | $ 4,930,304 | | | | $ 219,526 | |
| | | | |
Differences between income and/or capital gains as determined on a book basis and a tax basis are primarily due to differing treatments of pass-through entity income, bond discounts and premiums,non-deductible expenses and bond workout expenditures.
6. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investments (excluding short term securities) for the year ended May 31, 2019, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund | | | Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund | |
| |
| | |
Purchases | | | $495,139,181 | | | | $ 7,987,587 | |
| | |
Sales | | | $339,120,165 | | | | $39,177,627 | |
| | | | |
| | |
60 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
7. Credit Risk and Defaulted Securities
At May 31, 2019, Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund had 27.7% of its portfolio invested in high yield securities, rated below investment grade and unrated securities, if any. These securities may be more sensitive to economic conditions causing greater price volatility and are potentially subject to a greater risk of loss due to default than higher rated securities.
Certain or all Funds held defaulted securities and/or other securities for which the income has been deemed uncollectible. At May 31, 2019, the aggregate value of these securities for Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund and Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund was $54,552,773 and $4,012,500, representing 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively, of each Fund’s net assets. The Funds discontinue accruing income on securities for which income has been deemed uncollectible and provide an estimate for losses on interest receivable. The securities have been identified in the accompanying Statements of Investments.
8. Concentration of Risk
Certain or all Funds invest a large percentage of their total assets in obligations of issuers within their respective state and U.S. territories. Such concentration may subject the Funds to risks associated with industrial or regional matters, and economic, political or legal developments occurring within those states and U.S. territories. Investing in Puerto Rico securities may expose the Funds to heightened risks due to recent adverse economic and market changes, credit downgrades and ongoing restructuring discussions. In addition, investments in these securities are sensitive to interest rate changes and credit risk of the issuer and may subject the Funds to increased market volatility. The market for these investments may be limited, which may make them difficult to buy or sell.
9. Credit Facility
The Funds, together with other U.S. registered and foreign investment funds (collectively, Borrowers), managed by Franklin Templeton, are borrowers in a joint syndicated senior unsecured credit facility totaling $2 billion (Global Credit Facility) which matures on February 7, 2020. This Global Credit Facility provides a source of funds to the Borrowers for temporary and emergency purposes, including the ability to meet future unanticipated or unusually large redemption requests.
Under the terms of the Global Credit Facility, the Funds shall, in addition to interest charged on any borrowings made by the Funds and other costs incurred by the Funds, pay their share of fees and expenses incurred in connection with the implementation and maintenance of the Global Credit Facility, based upon their relative share of the aggregate net assets of all of the Borrowers, including an annual commitment fee of 0.15% based upon the unused portion of the Global Credit Facility. These fees are reflected in other expenses in the Statements of Operations. During the year ended May 31, 2019, the Funds did not use the Global Credit Facility.
10. Fair Value Measurements
The Funds follow a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and the Funds’ own market assumptions (unobservable inputs). These inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds’ financial instruments and are summarized in the following fair value hierarchy:
| • | | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical financial instruments |
| • | | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar financial instruments, interest rates, prepayment speed, credit risk, etc.) |
| • | | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Funds’ own assumptions in determining the fair value of financial instruments) |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 61 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10. Fair Value Measurements(continued)
The input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with financial instruments at that level.
At May 31, 2019, all of the Funds’ investments in financial instruments carried at fair value were valued using Level 2 inputs.
11. Subsequent Events
The Funds have evaluated subsequent events through the issuance of the financial statements and determined that no events have occurred that require disclosure.
| | | | |
| | |
62 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| | | | | | |
Abbreviations | | | | |
| | |
Selected Portfolio | | | | |
| | | |
ABAG | | The Association of Bay Area Governments | | HDA | | Housing Development Authority/Agency |
| | | |
AD | | Assessment District | | ID | | Improvement District |
| | | |
AGMC | | Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. | | IDB | | Industrial Development Bond/Board |
| | | |
AMBAC | | American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. | | LOC | | Letter of Credit |
| | | |
BAM | | Build America Mutual Assurance Co. | | MFHR | | Multi-Family Housing Revenue |
| | | |
CDA | | Community Development Authority/Agency | | NATL | | National Public Financial Guarantee Corp. |
| | | |
CFD | | Community Facilities District | | PBA | | Public Building Authority |
| | | |
COP | | Certificate of Participation | | PCFA | | Pollution Control Financing Authority |
| | | |
CRDA | | Community Redevelopment Authority/Agency | | PFA | | Public Financing Authority |
| | | |
CSD | | Central School District | | PFAR | | Public Financing Authority Revenue |
| | | |
ETM | | Escrow to Maturity | | PUD | | Public Utility District |
| | | |
FGIC | | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. | | RDA | | Redevelopment Agency/Authority |
| | | |
FHA | | Federal Housing Authority/Agency | | SPA | | Standby Purchase Agreement |
| | | |
GNMA | | Government National Mortgage Association | | UHSD | | Unified/Union High School District |
| | | |
GO | | General Obligation | | USD | | Unified/Union School District |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 63 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Trustees of Franklin Municipal Securities Trust and Shareholders of Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund and Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund
Opinions on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the statements of investments, of Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund and Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund (the “Funds”) as of May 31, 2019, the related statements of operations for the year ended May 31, 2019, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period ended May 31, 2019, including the related notes, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of each of the Funds as of May 31, 2019, the results of each of their operations for the year then ended, the changes in each of their net assets for each of the two years in the period ended May 31, 2019 and each of the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinions
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Funds’ financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Funds in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2019 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; when replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Francisco, California
July 17, 2019
We have served as the auditor of one or more investment companies in the Franklin Templeton funds since 1948.
| | | | |
| | |
64 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
Tax Information (unaudited)
Under Section 852(b)(5)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Funds hereby report 100% of the distributions paid from net investment income as exempt-interest dividends for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2019. A portion of the Funds’ exempt-interest dividends may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Bymid-February 2020, shareholders will be notified of amounts for use in preparing their 2019 income tax returns.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 65 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
Board Members and Officers
The name, year of birth and address of the officers and board members, as well as their affiliations, positions held with the Trust, principal occupations during at least the past five years and number of U.S. registered portfolios overseen in the Franklin Templeton fund complex, are shown below. Generally, each board member serves until that person’s successor is elected and qualified.
Independent Board Members
| | | | | | | | |
Name, Year of Birth and Address | | Position | | Length of Time Served | | Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Board Member* | | Other Directorships Held During at Least the Past 5 Years |
Harris J. Ashton (1932) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Trustee | | Since 1991 | | 138 | | Bar-S Foods (meat packing company) (1981-2010). |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Director of various companies; andformerly, Director, RBC Holdings, Inc. (bank holding company) (until 2002); and President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, General Host Corporation (nursery and craft centers) (until 1998). |
| | | | |
Terrence J. Checki (1945) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Trustee | | Since 2017 | | 114 | | Hess Corporation (exploration of oil and gas) (2014-present). |
| | |
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | | | | |
Member of the Council on Foreign Relations (1996-present); Member of the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations (1999-present); member of the Board of Trustees of the Economic Club of New York (2013-present); member of the Board of Trustees of the Foreign Policy Association (2005-present) and member of various other boards of trustees and advisory boards; andformerly, Executive Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Head of its Emerging Markets and Internal Affairs Group and Member of Management Committee (1995-2014); and Visiting Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (2014). |
| | | | |
Mary C. Choksi (1950) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Trustee | | Since 2014 | | 138 | | Avis Budget Group Inc. (car rental) (2007-present), Omnicom Group Inc. (advertising and marketing communications services) (2011-present) and White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (holding company) (2017-present). |
| | |
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | | | | |
Director of various companies; andformerly, Founder and Senior Advisor, Strategic Investment Group (investment management group) (2015-2017); Founding Partner and Senior Managing Director, Strategic Investment Group (1987–2015); Founding Partner and Managing Director, Emerging Markets Management LLC (investment management firm) (1987-2011); and Loan Officer/Senior Loan Officer/Senior Pension Investment Officer, World Bank Group (international financial institution) (1977-1987). |
| | | | |
Edith E. Holiday (1952) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Lead Independent Trustee | | Trustee since 1998 and Lead Independent Trustee since March 2019 | | 138 | | Hess Corporation (exploration of oil and gas) (1993-present), Canadian National Railway (railroad) (2001-present), White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (holding company) (2004-present), Santander Consumer USA Holdings, Inc. (consumer finance) (2016-present), RTI International Metals, Inc. (manufacture and distribution of titanium) (1999-2015) and H.J. Heinz Company (processed foods and allied products) (1994-2013). |
| | |
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | | | | |
Director or Trustee of various companies and trusts; andformerly, Assistant to the President of the United States and Secretary of the Cabinet (1990-1993); General Counsel to the United States Treasury Department (1989-1990); and Counselor to the Secretary and Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs and Public Liaison–United States Treasury Department (1988-1989). |
| | | | |
| | |
66 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
Independent Board Members(continued)
| | | | | | | | |
Name, Year of Birth and Address | | Position | | Length of Time Served | | Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Board Member* | | Other Directorships Held During at Least the Past 5 Years |
J. Michael Luttig (1954) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Trustee | | Since 2009 | | 138 | | Boeing Capital Corporation (aircraft financing) (2006-2013). |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Executive Vice President, Counselor and Senior Advisor to Boeing Chairman and Board of Directors, The Boeing Company (aerospace company) (May 2019); andformerly, General Counsel and member of the Executive Council, The Boeing Company (2006-2019) and Federal Appeals Court Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1991-2006). |
| | | | |
Larry D. Thompson (1945) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | 138 | | The Southern Company (energy company) (2014-present; previously 2010-2012), Graham Holdings Company (education and media organization) (2011-present) and Cbeyond, Inc. (business communications provider) (2010-2012). |
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years:
Director of various companies; Counsel, Finch McCranie, LLP (law firm) (2015-present); Independent Compliance Monitor and Auditor, Volkswagen AG (manufacturer of automobiles and commercial vehicles) (2017-present); John A. Sibley Professor of Corporate and Business Law, University of Georgia School of Law (2015-present; previously 2011-2012); andformerly,Executive Vice President - Government Affairs, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, PepsiCo, Inc. (consumer products) (2012-2014); Senior Vice President - Government Affairs, General Counsel and Secretary, PepsiCo, Inc. (2004-2011); Senior Fellow of The Brookings Institution (2003-2004); Visiting Professor, University of Georgia School of Law (2004); and Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice (2001-2003).
| | | | | | | | |
Interested Board Members and Officers | | |
| | | | |
Name, Year of Birth and Address | | Position | | Length of Time Served | | Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Board Member* | | Other Directorships Held During at Least the Past 5 Years |
| | | | |
**Gregory E. Johnson (1961) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | 152 | | None |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Chairman of the Board, Member – Office of the Chairman, Director and Chief Executive Officer, Franklin Resources, Inc.; officer and/or director or trustee, as the case may be, of some of the other subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. and of 42 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton; Vice Chairman, Investment Company Institute; andformerly, President, Franklin Resources, Inc. (1994-2015). |
| | | | |
**Rupert H. Johnson, Jr. (1940) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee since 2013 | | 138 | | None |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Vice Chairman, Member – Office of the Chairman and Director, Franklin Resources, Inc.; Director, Franklin Advisers, Inc.; and officer and/or director or trustee, as the case may be, of some of the other subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. and of 40 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton. |
| | | | |
Sheila Amoroso (1959) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Vice President | | Since 1999 | | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Senior Vice President, Franklin Advisers, Inc.; and officer of seven of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton. |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 67 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
Interested Board Members and Officers(continued)
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Name, Year of Birth and Address | | Position | | Length of Time Served | | Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Board Member* | | Other Directorships Held During at Least the Past 5 Years |
Alison E. Baur (1964) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Vice President | | Since 2012 | | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Deputy General Counsel, Franklin Templeton; and officer of some of the other subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. and of 44 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton. |
| | | | |
Sonal Desai, Ph.D. (1963) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | President and Chief Executive Officer – Investment Management | | Since December 2018 | | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Director and Executive Vice President, Franklin Advisers, Inc.; Executive Vice President, Franklin Templeton Institutional, LLC; and officer of 18 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton. |
| | | | |
Gaston Gardey (1967) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer | | Since 2009 | | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Treasurer, U.S. Fund Administration & Reporting and officer of 26 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton. |
| | | | |
Aliya S. Gordon (1973) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Vice President | | Since 2009 | | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Senior Associate General Counsel and officer of 44 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton. |
| | | | |
Steven J. Gray (1955) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Vice President and Co- Secretary | | Vice President since 2009 and Co- Secretary since January 2019 | | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Senior Associate General Counsel, Franklin Templeton; Vice President, Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc. and FASA, LLC; and officer of 44 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton. |
| | | | |
Matthew T. Hinkle (1971) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Chief Executive Officer – Finance and Administration | | Since 2017 | | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Senior Vice President, Franklin Templeton Services, LLC; officer of 44 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton; and formerly, Vice President, Global Tax (2012-April 2017) and Treasurer/Assistant Treasurer, Franklin Templeton (2009-2017). |
| | | | |
| | |
68 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
Interested Board Members and Officers(continued)
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Name, Year of Birth and Address | | Position | | Length of Time Served | | Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Board Member* | | Other Directorships Held During at Least the Past 5 Years |
Robert Lim (1948) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Vice President – AML Compliance | | Since 2016 | | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Vice President, Franklin Templeton Companies, LLC; Chief Compliance Officer, Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc. and Franklin Templeton Investor Services, LLC; and officer of 44 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton. |
| | | | |
Kimberly H. Novotny (1972) 300 S.E. 2nd Street Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | | Vice President | | Since 2013 | | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Associate General Counsel, Franklin Templeton; Vice President and Corporate Secretary, Fiduciary Trust International of the South; Vice President, Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC; Assistant Secretary, Franklin Resources, Inc.; and officer of 44 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton. |
| | | | |
Robert C. Rosselot (1960) 300 S.E. 2nd Street Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2013 | | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Director, Global Compliance, Franklin Templeton; Vice President, Franklin Templeton Companies, LLC; officer of 44 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton; andformerly, Senior Associate General Counsel, Franklin Templeton (2007-2013); and Secretary and Vice President, Templeton Group of Funds (2004-2013). |
| | | | |
Navid J. Tofigh (1972) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Vice President | | Since 2015 | | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Associate General Counsel and officer of 44 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton. |
| | | | |
Craig S. Tyle (1960) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Vice President | | Since 2005 | | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: General Counsel, Executive Vice President and Secretary, Franklin Resources, Inc.; and officer of some of the other subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. and of 44 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton. |
| | | | |
Thomas Walsh (1961) One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | | Vice President | | Since 1999 | | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Senior Vice President, Franklin Advisers, Inc.; and officer of seven of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton. |
| | | | |
Lori A. Weber (1964) 300 S.E. 2nd Street Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | | Vice President andCo-Secretary | | Vice President since 2011 and Co- Secretary since January 2019 | | Not Applicable | | Not Applicable |
|
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: Senior Associate General Counsel, Franklin Templeton; Assistant Secretary, Franklin Resources, Inc.; Vice President and Secretary, Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC; and officer of 44 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton. |
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 69 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
*We base the number of portfolios on each separate series of the U.S. registered investment companies within the Franklin Templeton fund complex. These portfolios have a common investment manager or affiliated investment managers.
**Gregory E. Johnson is considered to be an interested person of the Fund under the federal securities laws due to his position as an officer and director of Franklin Resources, Inc. (Resources), which is the parent company of the Fund’s investment manager and distributor. Rupert H. Johnson, Jr. is considered to be an interested person of the Fund under the federal securities laws due to his position as an officer and director and major shareholder of Resources.
Note 1: Rupert H. Johnson, Jr. is the uncle of Gregory E. Johnson.
Note 2: Effective March 12, 2019, John B. Wilson ceased to be a trustee of the Trust.
Note 3: Officer information is current as of the date of this report. It is possible that after this date, information about officers may change.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission require the Fund to disclose whether the Fund’s Audit Committee includes at least one member who is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of such Act and Rules. The Fund’s Board has determined that there is at least one such financial expert on the Audit Committee and has designated Mary C. Choksi as its audit committee financial expert. The Board believes that Ms. Choksi qualifies as such an expert in view of her extensive business background and experience. She currently serves as a director of Avis Budget Group, Inc. (2007-present) and formerly, Founder and Senior Advisor, Strategic Investment Group (1987 to 2017). Ms. Choksi has been a Member of the Fund’s Audit Committee since 2014. As a result of such background and experience, the Board believes that Ms. Choksi has acquired an understanding of generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements, the general application of such principles in connection with the accounting estimates, accruals and reserves, and analyzing and evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues generally comparable to those of the Fund, as well as an understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and an understanding of audit committee functions. Ms. Choksi is an independent Board member as that term is defined under the relevant Securities and Exchange Commission Rules and Releases.
The Statement of Additional Information (SAI) includes additional information about the board members and is available, without charge, upon request. Shareholders may call (800) DIALBEN/342-5236 to request the SAI.
| | | | |
| | |
70 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
Shareholder Information
Board Approval of Investment Management Agreements
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund
Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund
(each a Fund)
At anin-person meeting held on February 26, 2019 (Meeting), the Board of Trustees (Board) of Franklin Municipal Securities Trust (Trust), including a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (Independent Trustees), reviewed and approved the continuance of the investment management agreement between Franklin Advisers, Inc. (Manager) and the Trust, on behalf of each Fund (each a Management Agreement) for an additionalone-year period. The Independent Trustees received advice from and met separately with Independent Trustee counsel in considering whether to approve the continuation of each Management Agreement. Although the Management Agreements for the Funds were considered at the same Board meeting, the Board considered the information provided to it about the Funds together and with respect to each Fund separately as the Board deemed appropriate.
In considering the continuation of each Management Agreement, the Board reviewed and considered information provided by the Manager at the Meeting and throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. The Board also reviewed and considered information provided in response to a detailed set of requests for information submitted to the Manager by Independent Trustee counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees in connection with the annual contract renewal process. In addition, prior to the Meeting, the Independent Trustees held a telephonic contract renewal meeting at which the Independent Trustees conferred amongst themselves and Independent Trustee counsel about contract renewal matters. The Board reviewed and considered all of the factors it deemed relevant in approving the continuance of each Management Agreement, including, but not limited to: (i) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Manager; (ii) the investment performance of each Fund; (iii) the costs of the services provided and profits realized by the Manager and its affiliates from the relationship with each Fund; (iv) the extent to which economies of scale are realized as each Fund grows; and (v) whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of Fund investors.
In approving the continuance of each Management Agreement, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, determined that the terms of the Management Agreement are fair and reasonable and that the continuance of such Management Agreement is in the interests of the applicable Fund and its shareholders. While attention was given to all information furnished, the following discusses some primary factors relevant to the Board’s determination.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Board reviewed and considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of investment management services provided by the Manager and its affiliates to the Funds and their shareholders. This information included, among other things, the qualifications, background and experience of the senior management and investment personnel of the Manager; the structure of investment personnel compensation; oversight of third-party service providers; investment performance reports and related financial information for each Fund; reports on expenses, shareholder services, marketing support payments made to financial intermediaries and third party servicing arrangements; legal and compliance matters; risk controls; pricing and other services provided by the Manager and its affiliates; and management fees charged by the Manager and its affiliates to US funds and other accounts, including management’s explanation of differences among accounts where relevant. The Board also reviewed and considered an annual report on payments made by Franklin Templeton Investments (FTI) or the Funds to financial intermediaries, as well as a memorandum relating to third-party servicing arrangements in response to a guidance update in 2016 from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) relating to mutual fund distribution andsub-accounting fees. The Board noted management’s continuing efforts and expenditures in establishing effective business continuity plans and developing strategies to address areas of heightened concern in the mutual fund industry, such as cybersecurity and liquidity risk management. The Board also recognized management’s commitment to facilitating Board oversight of liquidity through the designation of a liquidity/risk administrator and the development of reports that highlight the amount of illiquid investments for each Fund.
The Board also reviewed and considered the benefits provided to Fund shareholders of investing in a fund that is part of the Franklin Templeton family of funds. The Board noted the financial position of Franklin Resources, Inc. (FRI),
| | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | 71 |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
the Manager’s parent, and its commitment to the mutual fund business as evidenced by its continued introduction of new funds, reassessment of the fund offerings in response to the market environment and project initiatives and capital investments relating to the services provided to the Funds by the FTI organization.
Following consideration of such information, the Board was satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Manager and its affiliates to the Funds and their shareholders.
Fund Performance
The Board reviewed and considered the performance results of each Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2018. The Board considered the performance returns for each Fund in comparison to the performance returns of mutual funds deemed comparable to the Fund included in a universe (Performance Universe) selected by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (Broadridge), an independent provider of investment company data. The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds included in a Performance Universe. The Board also reviewed and considered Fund performance reports provided and discussions that occurred with portfolio managers at Board meetings throughout the year. A summary of each Fund’s performance results is below.
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund- The Performance Universe for this Fund included the Fund and all retail and institutional California municipal debt funds. The Board noted that the Fund’s annualized income return and annualized total return for theone-, three-, five- and10-year periods were above the medians of its Performance Universe. The Board concluded that the Fund’s performance was satisfactory.
Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund- The Performance Universe for this Fund included the Fund and all retail and institutional “other states” municipal debt funds. The Board noted that the Fund’s annualized income return for theone-, three-, five- and10-year periods was above the median of its Performance Universe. The Board also noted that the Fund’s annualized total return for theone-, three-, five- and10-year periods was below the median of its Performance Universe. Given the Fund’s income-oriented investment objective, the Board concluded that the Fund’s performance was satisfactory.
Comparative Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed and considered information regarding
each Fund’s actual total expense ratio and its various components, including, as applicable, management fees; transfer agent expenses; underlying fund expenses; Rule12b-1 andnon-Rule12b-1 service fees; and othernon-management fees. The Board also noted the quarterly and annual reports it receives on all marketing support payments made by FTI to financial intermediaries. The Board considered the actual total expense ratio and, separately, the contractual management fee rate, without the effect of fee waivers, if any (Management Rate) of each Fund in comparison to the median expense ratio and median Management Rate, respectively, of other mutual funds deemed comparable to and with a similar expense structure to the Fund selected by Broadridge (Expense Group). Broadridge fee and expense data is based upon information taken from each fund’s most recent annual report, which reflects historical asset levels that may be quite different from those currently existing, particularly in a period of market volatility. While recognizing such inherent limitation and the fact that expense ratios and Management Rates generally increase as assets decline and decrease as assets grow, the Board believed the independent analysis conducted by Broadridge to be an appropriate measure of comparative fees and expenses. The Broadridge Management Rate includes administrative charges, and the actual total expense ratio, for comparative consistency, was shown for Class A1 shares for the Funds and Class A shares for the other funds in the Expense Group with multiple classes of shares. The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds included in an Expense Group.
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund- The Expense Group for the Fund included the Fund and nine other California municipal debt funds. The Board noted that the Management Rate and the actual total expense ratio for the Fund were below the medians of its Expense Group. The Board concluded that the Management Rate charged to the Fund is reasonable.
Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund- The Expense Group for the Fund included the Fund and nine other “other states” municipal debt funds. The Board noted that the Management Rate for the Fund was equal to the median of its Expense Group. The Board also noted that the actual total expense ratio for the Fund was below the median of its Expense Group. The Board concluded that the Management Rate charged to the Fund is reasonable.
| | | | |
| | |
72 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
Profitability
The Board reviewed and considered information regarding the profits realized by the Manager and its affiliates in connection with the operation of each Fund. In this respect, the Board considered the Fund profitability analysis provided by the Manager that addresses the overall profitability of FTI’s US fund business, as well as its profits in providing investment management and other services to each of the individual funds during the12-month period ended September 30, 2018, being the most recent fiscalyear-end for FRI. The Board noted that although management continually makes refinements to its methodologies used in calculating profitability in response to organizational and product-related changes, the overall methodology has remained consistent with that used in the Funds’ profitability report presentations from prior years. Additionally, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, auditor to FRI and certain Franklin Templeton funds, has been engaged by the Manager to periodically review and assess the allocation methodologies to be used solely by the Funds’ Board with respect to the profitability analysis.
The Board noted management’s belief that costs incurred in establishing the infrastructure necessary for the type of mutual fund operations conducted by the Manager and its affiliates may not be fully reflected in the expenses allocated to each Fund in determining its profitability, as well as the fact that the level of profits, to a certain extent, reflected operational cost savings and efficiencies initiated by management. The Board also noted management’s expenditures in improving shareholder services provided to the Funds, as well as the need to implement systems and meet additional regulatory and compliance requirements resulting from recent SEC and other regulatory requirements.
The Board also considered the extent to which the Manager and its affiliates might derive ancillary benefits from fund operations, including revenues generated from transfer agent services, potential benefits resulting from personnel and systems enhancements necessitated by fund growth, as well as increased leverage with service providers and counterparties. Based upon its consideration of all these factors, the Board concluded that the level of profits realized by the Manager and its affiliates from providing services to each Fund was not excessive in view of the nature, extent and quality of services provided to each Fund.
Economies of Scale
The Board reviewed and considered the extent to which the
Manager may realize economies of scale, if any, as each Fund grows larger and whether each Fund’s management fee structure reflects any economies of scale for the benefit of shareholders. With respect to possible economies of scale, the Board noted the existence of management fee breakpoints, which operate generally to share any economies of scale with a Fund’s shareholders by reducing the Fund’s effective management fees as the Fund grows in size. The Board considered the Manager’s view that any analyses of potential economies of scale in managing a particular fund are inherently limited in light of the joint and common costs and investments the Manager incurs across the Franklin Templeton family of funds as a whole. The Board noted that the Franklin Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund had experienced a decrease in assets and would not be expected to demonstrate additional economies of scale in the near term, but concluded that to the extent economies of scale may be realized by the Manager and its affiliates, each Fund’s management fee structure provided a sharing of benefits with the Fund and its shareholders as the Fund grows.
Conclusion
Based on its review, consideration and evaluation of all factors it believed relevant, including the above-described factors and conclusions, the Board unanimously approved the continuation of each Management Agreement for an additionalone-year period.
Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures
The Trust’s investment manager has established Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures (Policies) that the Trust uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities. Shareholders may view the Trust’s complete Policies online at franklintempleton.com. Alternatively, shareholders may request copies of the Policies free of charge by calling the Proxy Group collect at (954)527-7678 or by sending a written request to: Franklin Templeton Companies, LLC, 300 S.E. 2nd Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, Attention: Proxy Group. Copies of the Trust’s proxy voting records are also made available online at franklintempleton.com and posted on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov and reflect the most recent12-month period ended June 30.
| | | | | | |
| | |
franklintempleton.com | | Annual Report | | | 73 | |
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
Quarterly Statement of Investments
The Trust files a complete statement of investments with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters for each fiscal year as an exhibit to its report on FormN-PORT. Shareholders may view the filed FormN-PORT by visiting the Commission’s website at sec.gov. The filed form may also be viewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information regarding the operations of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling(800) SEC-0330.
Householding of Reports and Prospectuses
You will receive each Fund’s financial reports every six months as well as an annual updated summary prospectus (prospectus available upon request). To reduce Fund expenses, we try to identify related shareholders in a household and send only one copy of the financial reports and summary prospectus. This process, called “householding,” will continue indefinitely unless you instruct us otherwise. If you prefer not to have these documents householded, please call us at (800)632-2301. At any time you may view current prospectuses/summary prospectuses and financial reports on our website. If you choose, you may receive these documents through electronic delivery.
| | | | |
| | |
74 | | Annual Report | | franklintempleton.com |
This page intentionally left blank.
This page intentionally left blank.
Authorized for distribution only when accompanied or preceded by a summary prospectus and/or prospectus. Investors should carefully consider a fund’s investment goals, risks, charges and expenses before investing. A prospectus contains this and other information; please read it carefully before investing.
To help ensure we provide you with quality service, all calls to and from our service areas are monitored and/or recorded.
| | | | | | |
 | | Annual Report and Shareholder Letter |
| Franklin Municipal Securities Trust |
| Investment Manager | | Distributor | | Shareholder Services |
| | Franklin Advisers, Inc. | | Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc. | | (800)632-2301 |
| | | | (800) DIAL BEN®/342-5236 | | |
| | | | franklintempleton.com | | |
| | |
© 2019 Franklin Templeton Investments. All rights reserved. | | MUN A 07/19 |
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
(a) The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officers and principal financial and accounting officer.
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(f) Pursuant to Item 12(a)(1), the Registrant is attaching as an exhibit a copy of its code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officers and principal financial and accounting officer.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
(a) (1) The Registrant has an audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee.
(2) The audit committee financial expert is John B. Wilson and he is “independent” as defined under the relevant Securities and Exchange Commission Rules and Releases.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The aggregate fees paid to the principal accountant for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements or for services that are normally provided by the principal accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were $75,079 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2019 and $81,393 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2018.
There were no fees paid to the principal accountant for assurance and related services rendered by the principal accountant to the registrant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of Item 4.
There were no fees paid to the principal accountant for assurance and related services rendered by the principal accountant to the registrant’s investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of their financial statements.
There were no fees paid to the principal accountant for professional services rendered by the principal accountant to the registrant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
The aggregate fees paid to the principal accountant for professional services rendered by the principal accountant to the registrant’s
investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were $25,000 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2019 and $0 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2018. The services for which these fees were paid included professional fees in connection with tax treatment of equipment lease transactions, professional fees in connection with an Indonesia withholding tax refund claim and tax consulting services related to the operating agreement and term sheet for the launch of a new fund.
The aggregate fees paid to the principal accountant for products and services rendered by the principal accountant to the registrant not reported in paragraphs (a)-(c) of Item 4 were $0 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2019 and $979 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2018. The services for which these fees were paid included review of materials provided to the fund Board in connection with the investment management contract renewal process.
The aggregate fees paid to the principal accountant for products and services rendered by the principal accountant to the registrant’s investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant other than services reported in paragraphs (a)-(c) of Item 4 were $16,500 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2019 and $14,000 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2018. The services for which these fees were paid included the issuance of an Auditor’s Certificate for South Korean regulatory shareholders disclosures, assets under management certification, and benchmarking services in connection with the ICI TA survey.
(e) (1) The registrant’s audit committee is directly responsible for approving the services to be provided by the auditors, including:
(i) pre-approval of all audit and audit related services;
(ii) pre-approval of allnon-audit related services to be provided to the Fund by the auditors;
(iii) pre-approval of allnon-audit related services to be provided to the registrant by the auditors to the registrant’s investment adviser or to any entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the registrant’s investment adviser and that provides ongoing services to the registrant where thenon-audit services relate directly to the operations or financial reporting of the registrant; and
(iv) establishment by the audit committee, if deemed necessary or appropriate, as an alternative to committeepre-approval of services to be provided by the auditors, as required by paragraphs (ii) and (iii) above, of policies and procedures to permit such services to bepre-approved by other means, such as through establishment of guidelines or by action of a designated member or members of the committee; provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service and the committee is informed of each service and
such policies and procedures do not include delegation of audit committee responsibilities, as contemplated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, to management; subject, in the case of (ii) through (iv), to any waivers, exceptions or exemptions that may be available under applicable law or rules.
(e) (2) None of the services provided to the registrant described in paragraphs (b)-(d) of Item 4 were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule2-01 of regulationS-X.
(f) No disclosures are required by this Item 4(f).
(g) The aggregatenon-audit fees paid to the principal accountant for services rendered by the principal accountant to the registrant and the registrant’s investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant were $41,500 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2019 and $14,979 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2018.
(h) The registrant’s audit committee of the board has considered whether the provision ofnon-audit services that were rendered to the registrant’s investment adviser (not including anysub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were notpre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule2-01 of RegulationS-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
| | |
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. | | N/A |
| |
Item 6. Schedule of Investments. | | N/A |
| |
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures forClosed-End Management Investment Companies. | | N/A |
| |
Item 8. Portfolio Managers ofClosed-End Management Investment Companies. | | N/A |
| |
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities byClosed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers. | | N/A |
| |
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. | | |
There have been no changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant’s Board of Trustees that would require disclosure herein.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Registrant maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Registrant’s filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Investment Company Act of 1940 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such information is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Registrant’s management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, recognizes that any set of controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
Within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Shareholder Report onForm N-CSR, the Registrant had carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Registrant’s management, including the Registrant’s principal executive officer and the Registrant’s principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on such evaluation, the Registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls. There have been no changes in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the internal control over financial reporting.
| | |
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities forClosed-End Management Investment Company. | | N/A |
Item 13. Exhibits.
(a) (1) Code of Ethics
(a) (2) Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Matthew T. Hinkle, Chief Executive Officer - Finance and Administration, and Gaston Gardey, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
(b) Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Matthew T. Hinkle, Chief Executive Officer - Finance and Administration, and Gaston Gardey, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES TRUST
By S\MATTHEW T. HINKLE
Matthew T. Hinkle
Chief Executive Officer – Finance and Administration
Date July 31, 2019
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By S\MATTHEW T. HINKLE
Matthew T. Hinkle
Chief Executive Officer – Finance and Administration
Date July 31, 2019
By S\GASTON GARDEY
Gaston Gardey
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
Date July 31, 2019