Exhibit 10.37
PRIVILEGED SETTLEMENT COMMUNICATION
Steiner v. MedQuist, Inc.
No. 1:04-CV-05487
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) outlines the essential terms of a proposed settlement (the “Settlement”) of the above-referenced action (“Litigation”) between defendants MedQuist, Inc. (“MedQuist”), Brian J. Kearns, David A. Cohen, John A. Donohoe, Ethan Cohen, John W. Quaintance, and Ronald F. Scarpone (collectively “Defendants”) and Lead Plaintiff Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters Pension Fund (“Lead Plaintiff”) on behalf of itself and the members of the Settlement Class defined below (collectively, the “Parties”). This MOU is intended to be used as a basis for drafting a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Stipulation”) and accompanying papers which shall embody the terms set forth herein and such other and consistent terms as are agreed upon by counsel for the Parties.
1. For purposes of this Settlement, the Settlement Class shall be defined as: all persons who purchased the publicly traded securities of MedQuist between March 29, 2000 to June 14, 2004 (the “Settlement Class Period”). Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants and their related parties.
2. The Settlement Fund will consist of $7,750,000 in cash. The Settlement Fund shall be deposited into an interest-bearing account designated by Lead Counsel and will be deposited within 20 business days of the execution of this MOU. If the agreed upon sums are not deposited, such non-deposited sums will bear interest at 8% per annum from the date due until the date of actual deposit. The Individual Defendants will not have any responsibility for contributing to or funding the settlement.
3. This is not a claims-made settlement and, if all conditions under the Stipulation are satisfied, the Settlement receives final approval, the Settlement Fund will not be returned to defendants.
4. Following execution of this MOU, the Parties and their counsel shall use their best efforts to finalize and execute the Stipulation and such other documentation as may be required or appropriate in order to obtain approval by the Court of the Settlement of the Litigation upon the terms set forth in this MOU. Promptly upon execution of the Stipulation, the Parties shall apply to the Court for preliminary approval of the Settlement and for the scheduling of a hearing for consideration of final approval of the Settlement and Lead Counsel’s application for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses.
5. Simultaneously with the of execution of this MOU, counsel for the Parties will file a stipulation and proposed order giving notice to the Court of the Settlement and relieving the Individual Defendants from any obligation to file answers to the Second Amended Complaint. If the Settlement is not approved by the Court or is otherwise terminated, the Individual Defendants’ answers will be due, absent an additional written agreement by the Parties setting a new date, 6 weeks after entry of an order denying final approval by the Court or after such other termination of the Settlement.
6. The Parties intend that this MOU will lead to a final settlement of the Litigation and shall use their best efforts to negotiate a binding Stipulation to be submitted to the Court for preliminary and final approval.
7. The Stipulation shall provide for the dismissal of the Litigation with prejudice upon final approval of the Settlement and shall contain the usual release of claims in this type of action arising out of, relating to, or in connection with, the purchase of MedQuist publicly traded securities during the Settlement Class Period, which have been or could have been asserted by any member of the Settlement Class in the Litigation against the Defendants, but will specifically exclude the claims presently asserted in South Broward Hospital District v. MedQuist, Inc., No. 1:05-CV-02206-JBS-AMD; Myers v. MedQuist, Civil No. 05-4608(JBS); and Kanter v. MedQuist, Civil No. 04-5542(JBS). Defendants shall release the Lead Plaintiff, the members of the Settlement Class and their counsel from any claims relating to the institution, prosecution or settlement of the Litigation.
8. The Stipulation shall also provide (among other terms) that:
(a) Defendants have denied and continue to deny that they have committed any act or omission giving rise to any liability and/or violation of law;
(b) neither the Settlement nor any of its terms shall constitute an admission or finding of wrongful conduct, acts or omissions;
(c) The Lead Plaintiff, Defendants, and their counsel shall not make any applications for sanctions, pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) or other court rule or statute, with respect to any claims or defenses in this Litigation. The Defendants agree that the Litigation was filed in good faith and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, and is being settled voluntarily by the Defendants after consultation with competent legal counsel.
(d) the allocation of the Settlement Fund among the members of the Settlement Class shall be subject to a plan of allocation to be proposed by Lead Counsel and approved by the Court. Defendants will take no position with respect to such proposed plan of allocation or such plan as may be approved by the court, such plan of allocation is a matter separate and apart from the proposed Settlement between the Parties and any decision by the court concerning the plan of allocation shall not affect the validity or finality of the Settlement;
(e) Defendants shall take no position with respect to any questions concerning Lead Counsel’s request or award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses, which fees and expenses shall be paid from the Settlement Fund; and
(f) Plaintiff’s Counsel may apply for and receive an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses from the Settlement Fund in such amounts as may be approved by the Court and that any amount included in such award shall be paid to Lead Counsel immediately upon the Court’s approval of the Settlement and award, subject to each counsel’s obligation to pay back any such amount if, or to the extent that, the fee award is amended or does not become final.
9. All reasonable costs and expenses of class notice and administration of the Settlement shall be paid from the Settlement Fund when incurred. The Settlement Fund, less any amounts incurred for notice, administration, and/or taxes shall revert to the entities or persons making the deposits if the Settlement does not become effective.
10. Lead Counsel may designate the settlement claims administrator, subject to Court approval. MedQuist shall provide or cause to be provided to the settlement claims administrator its shareholder lists as appropriate for providing notice to the Settlement Class.
11. If the Settlement outlined in this MOU is not approved by the Court or is terminated: (a) the Settlement shall be without prejudice, and none of its terms shall be effective or enforceable, except to the extent costs of notice and administration have been incurred or expended; (b) the Parties shall revert to their litigation positions immediately prior to the execution of this MOU (subject to the terms of Paragraph 5 regarding the timing of the Individual Defendants’ answers); and (c) the fact and terms of this Settlement shall not be admissible in any trial of this Litigation.
12. This MOU may be executed in counterparts, including by signature transmitted by facsimile. Each counterpart when so executed shall be deemed to be an original, and all such counterparts together shall constitute the same instrument. The undersigned signatories represent that they have authority from their clients to execute this MOU. The terms of this MOU and Settlement shall inure to and be binding upon the Parties and their successors in interest.
IT IS HEREBY AGREED by the undersigned.
DATED: 3/23/2007 |
| LITE DePALMA GREENBERG |
|
| & RIVAS, LLC |
|
| JOSEPH J. DePALMA |
|
| Two Gateway Center, 12th Floor |
|
|
|
|
| Liaison Counsel |
|
|
|
|
| LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER |
|
| RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP |
|
| JEFFREY W. LAWRENCE |
|
| SHIRLEY H. HUANG |
|
|
|
|
| /s/ JEFFREY W. LAWRENCE |
|
| JEFFREY W. LAWRENCE |
|
|
|
|
| 100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 |
|
|
|
|
| LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER |
|
| RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP |
|
| SAMUEL H. RUDMAN |
|
| DAVID A. ROSENFELD |
|
| 58 South Service Road, Suite 200 |
|
|
|
|
| Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs |
| GREENBAUM ROWE SMITH & DAVID | |
|
| MARC GROSS |
|
| 6 Becker Farm Road |
|
| Attorneys for Defendant Ronald F. Scarpone, |
|
|
|
DATED: 3/23/2007 |
| WINSTON & STRAWN LLP |
|
|
|
|
| /s/ GAIL J. STANDISH |
|
| GAIL J. STANDISH |
|
|
|
|
| 333 South Grand Avenue, 38th Floor |
|
|
|
|
| Attorneys for Defendant Ronald F. Scarpone, |
|
|
|
DATED: 3/21/2007 |
| BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC |
|
|
|
|
| /s/ BRIAN J. MCCORMICK, JR. |
|
| BRIAN J. MCCORMICK, JR. |
|
|
|
|
| 1835 Market Street, 14th Floor |
|
|
|
|
| Attorneys for Defendant, John W. Quaintance |
|
|
|
DATED: 3/23/2007 |
| LATHAM & WATKINS LLP |
|
|
|
|
| /s/ EDWARD J. SHAPIRO |
|
| EDWARD J. SHAPIRO |
| 555 11th Street, N.W., Suite 1000 | |
|
|
|
|
| Attorneys for Defendant Brian J. Kearns |
|
|
|
DATED: 3/23/2007 |
| MONTGOMERY, MCCRACKEN, WALKER |
|
|
|
|
| /s/ JOHN J. LEVY |
|
| JOHN J. LEVY |
|
|
|
|
| Liberty View |
|
|
|
|
| Attorneys for Defendant Ethan Cohen |
|
|
|
DATED: 3/23/2007 |
| DECHERT LLP |
|
|
|
|
| /s/ DAVID A. KOTLER |
|
| DAVID A. KOTLER |
|
|
|
|
| Princeton Pike Corporate Center |
|
|
|
|
| Attorneys for Defendant David A. Cohen |
|
|
|
DATED: 3/23/2007 |
| KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP |
|
|
|
|
| /s/ JOEL W. STERNMAN |
|
| JOEL W. STERNMAN |
|
| 575 Madison Avenue |
|
|
|
|
| Attorneys for Defendant John A. Donohoe |