UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: | 811-07810 |
Exact name of registrant as specified in charter: | Delaware Investments®Colorado Municipal |
Income Fund, Inc. | |
Address of principal executive offices: | 2005 Market Street |
Philadelphia, PA 19103 | |
Name and address of agent for service: | David F. Connor, Esq. |
2005 Market Street | |
Philadelphia, PA 19103 | |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: | (800) 523-1918 |
Date of fiscal year end: | March 31 |
Date of reporting period: | March 31, 2020 |
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders
Table of Contents
Annual report
Closed-end funds
Delaware Funds® by Macquarie Closed-End Municipal Bond Funds
March 31, 2020
Beginning on or about June 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of your Fund’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent to you by mail, unless you specifically request them from the Fund or from your financial intermediary, such as a broker/dealer, bank, or insurance company. Instead, you will be notified by mail each time a report is posted on the website and provided with a link to access the report.
If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you do not need to take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from the Fund electronically by logging into your Investor Center account at computershare.com/investor and going to “Communication Preferences” or by calling Computershare and speaking to a representative.
You may elect to receive paper copies of all future shareholder reports free of charge. You can inform the Fund that you wish to continue receiving paper copies of your shareholder reports by contacting us at 866 437-0252. If you own these shares through a financial intermediary, you may contact your financial intermediary to elect to continue to receive paper copies of your shareholder reports. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held with the Delaware Funds by Macquarie or your financial intermediary.
Table of Contents
1 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
7 | ||||
27 | ||||
28 | ||||
29 | ||||
31 | ||||
32 | ||||
35 | ||||
44 | ||||
45 | ||||
47 | ||||
51 |
Macquarie Asset Management (MAM) offers a diverse range of products including securities investment management, infrastructure and real asset management, and fund and equity-based structured products. Macquarie Investment Management (MIM) is the marketing name for certain companies comprising the asset management division of Macquarie Group. This includes the following investment advisers: Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust (MIMBT), Macquarie Funds Management Hong Kong Limited, Macquarie Investment Management Austria Kapitalanlage AG, Macquarie Investment Management Global Limited, Macquarie Investment Management Europe Limited, Macquarie Capital Investment Management LLC, and Macquarie Investment Management Europe S.A. For more information, including press releases, please visit delawarefunds.com/closed-end.
Unless otherwise noted, views expressed herein are current as of March 31, 2020, and subject to change for events occurring after such date.
The Funds are not FDIC insured and are not guaranteed. It is possible to lose the principal amount invested.
Advisory services provided by Delaware Management Company, a series of MIMBT, a US registered investment advisor.
Other than Macquarie Bank Limited (MBL), none of the entities noted are authorized deposit-taking institutions for the purposes of the Banking Act 1959 (Commonwealth of Australia). The obligations of these entities do not represent deposits or other liabilities of MBL. MBL does not guarantee or otherwise provide assurance in respect of the obligations of these entities, unless noted otherwise. The Funds are governed by US laws and regulations.
All third-party marks cited are the property of their respective owners.
© 2020 Macquarie Management Holdings, Inc.
Table of Contents
Delaware Funds® by Macquarie Closed-End Municipal Bond Funds
April 7, 2020 (Unaudited)
Economic conditions
For most of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020, the US economy continued along its steady growth path with historically low unemployment. In the second calendar quarter of 2019, the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) – a measure of national economic output – rose by an annualized 2.0%, followed by expansions of 2.1% in both the year’s third and fourth quarters. Meanwhile, the US jobless rate remained at or near a 50-year low throughout 2019 and into early 2020.
Then, starting in February, global economic conditions dramatically worsened, as the full social and financial impact of the new coronavirus became increasingly evident. As quarantine orders mounted across the country and around the world, economic activity ground to a halt, and job losses grew by the millions.
Both the US Federal Reserve and the federal government took aggressive action to try to ease the damage. In early March, the Fed cut its benchmark short-term interest rate by 0.50 percentage points. Two weeks later, it followed that up with a reduction of another one percentage point, bringing the federal funds rate to essentially zero – matching the rate throughout most of the recovery from the 2008 financial crisis. Also, in late March, the federal government passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, a $2 trillion economic stimulus bill centered on providing support to individuals and businesses hurt by the economic fallout.
Municipal bond market conditions
Overall, the municipal bond market, as measured by the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index, returned 3.85% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020.
Over those 12 months, however, municipal bond investors encountered two vastly different sets of market conditions. In the period between the start of the fiscal year and March 9, 2020, municipal bonds enjoyed robust performance amid healthy demand for tax-exempt securities coupled with relatively limited supply. In this environment, longer-duration, lower-rated securities generally outperformed their shorter-maturity, more highly rated counterparts, as many investors accepted greater interest rate risk and credit risk in exchange for higher yields. During this stretch, the municipal bond market, as measured by the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index, gained 8.40%.
Starting on March 10, however, conditions for investors in municipal bonds suddenly shifted. With mounting concern about the coronavirus, market volatility soared, liquidity dried up, and more highly leveraged institutional investors were forced to unload their municipal debt. Investors, eager for safety, bid up prices of more highly rated, shorter-term bonds, while lower-quality, longer-term issues lagged, reflecting their increased credit and duration risk. In the fiscal year’s final days, market conditions improved somewhat,
and the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index declined 4.20% from March 10 to March 31.
Looking at the full fiscal year, the following tables indicate how bonds with longer maturities outperformed their shorter-dated counterparts, while higher-rated issues fared better than their lower-rated counterparts.
The following tables show the returns experienced by municipal bonds of varying maturity lengths and credit ratings for the Funds’ fiscal year ended March 31, 2020:
Returns by maturity
1 year | +1.69% | |||
3 years | +1.93% | |||
10 years | +4.00% | |||
22+ years | +4.91% | |||
Returns by credit rating | ||||
AAA | +4.52% | |||
AA | +4.30% | |||
A | +3.45% | |||
BBB | +1.13% |
Source: Barclays.
A consistent management approach
Our approach for managing these three Funds remained generally consistent throughout the fiscal year, as it does regardless of the underlying market backdrop. Our approach continued to be bottom-up, meaning we select bonds for purchase on an issuer-by-issuer basis, based on our team’s thorough individual credit research. We regularly seek bonds that we believe offer the Funds’ shareholders an attractive trade-off between reward potential and risk.
Throughout the fiscal year, our default operating mode was to avoid actively selling bonds. This was because many of the Funds’ holdings were issued years ago at a time of higher interest rates. Thus, many of the Funds’ existing positions were more attractive to us than bonds available for purchase during the fiscal year, given the less compelling yields predominately offered by newer bonds.
Even as we continued to follow this approach throughout the 12 months, in March we sought to take advantage of the radically shifting market conditions. As conditions became more volatile and many bonds experienced rapidly rising yields, we looked for opportunities to sell existing holdings at a loss – which could be applied against future capital gains – and use the proceeds to buy higher yielding bonds with what we viewed as favorable underlying quality despite their near-term performance challenges. Our ability to execute this strategy varied by Fund due to supply constraints in their investment universes and differences in the composition of the Funds’ portfolios.
(continues) | 1 |
Table of Contents
Portfolio management review
Delaware Funds® by Macquarie Closed-End Municipal Bond Funds
We purchased Puerto Rican bonds during the fiscal year because, although they are presently in default, we believe they have relative value that will increase following their restructure.
Individual performance effects
For the full fiscal year, longer-duration bonds – those with more sensitivity to interest rates – outperformed bonds with shorter durations, and bonds with higher credit ratings outperformed lower-quality bonds. Many of the Funds’ strongest and weakest performers for the fiscal year reflected these performance trends.
For example, inDelaware Investments® National Municipal Income Fund, the strongest individual performers included bonds of Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (rated AA- and maturing in 2047) and California Educational Facilities Authority revenue bonds for Stanford University (rated AAA and maturing in 2049). These holdings, which returned roughly 17% and 14%, respectively, benefited from their long maturity dates and high credit ratings in a market environment that disproportionately rewarded securities with these characteristics.
The Fund’s weakest individual performers were lower-investment-grade continuing care retirement community issues of Cardinal Bay (Texas) and Great Lakes Senior Living Communities (Arizona). Many senior housing facilities, particularly those now actively seeking new residents, are encountering financial challenges as the coronavirus has impeded the ability of facilities to ramp up occupancy. The Cardinal Bay bonds declined close to 17% for the 12-month period, while the Great Lakes holding lost more than 16%.
InDelaware Investments Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc., the leading individual performer was a BBB-rated municipal lease bond issue of Denver Health and Hospital Authority. This holding returned close to 11% for the 12 months, partly reflecting
the bonds’ relatively short duration, which proved desirable during the market volatility late in the Fund’s fiscal year. A short duration coupled with a relatively high credit rating also helped boost Grand River Hospital District bonds, which returned more than 10%.
Meanwhile, this Fund’s weakest performers included another continuing care retirement community holding, Frasier Meadows Manor, which had a sub-investment-grade credit rating and declined more than 11% for the fiscal year. The Fund’s position in Guam water and sewer bonds, with their lower-investment-grade credit rating, also limited performance. These securities lost more than 4%, with much of that decline coming during the March 2020 market volatility.
InDelaware Investments Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc., a position in CC-rated bonds for the Stride Academy charter school returned 30%, as investors perceived improving credit quality for the issuer. The Fund’s allocation to Fairview Health Services hospital bonds, maturing in 2048 and with an A+ credit rating from Standard & Poor’s, returned more than 9%.
The Fund’s weakest-performing holding was a position in Minnesota Senior Living continuing care retirement community bonds, which returned declined 32% for the Fund’s fiscal year, reflecting their lower-investment-grade credit rating, as well as the broad challenges facing senior housing issues. This Fund also saw underperformance from its holding in Academia Cesar Chavez charter school bonds, which fell close to 11%, as the issuer continued to experience subpar educational performance metrics.
2
Table of Contents
Fixed income securities and bond funds can lose value, and investors can lose principal, as interest rates rise. They also may be affected by economic conditions that hinder an issuer’s ability to make interest and principal payments on its debt.
The Funds may also be subject to prepayment risk, the risk that the principal of a bond that is held by a portfolio will be prepaid prior to maturity, at the time when interest rates are lower than what the bond was paying. A portfolio may then have to reinvest that money at a lower interest rate.
High yielding, non-investment-grade bonds (junk bonds) involve higher risk than investment grade bonds.
Substantially all dividend income derived from tax-free funds is exempt from federal income tax. Some income may be subject to state or local and/or the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) that applies to certain investors. Capital gains, if any, are taxable.
Funds that invest primarily in one state may be more susceptible to the economic, regulatory, regional, and other factors of that state than geographically diversified funds.
The Funds may experience portfolio turnover that approaches or exceeds 100%, which could result in higher transaction costs and tax liability.
The Funds’ use of leverage may expose common shareholders to additional volatility, and cause the Funds to incur certain costs. In the event that the Funds are unable to meet certain criteria (including, but not limited to, maintaining certain ratings with Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service, funding dividend payments or funding redemptions), the Funds will pay additional fees with respect to the leverage.
Duration number will change as market conditions change. Therefore, duration should not be solely relied upon to indicate a municipal bond fund’s potential volatility.
LIBOR risk is the risk that potential changes related to the use of the London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) could have adverse impacts on financial instruments which reference LIBOR. The abandonment of LIBOR could affect the value and liquidity of instruments which reference LIBOR.
The disruptions caused by natural disasters, pandemics, or similar events could prevent the Funds from executing advantageous investment decisions in a timely manner and could negatively impact the Funds’ abilities to achieve their investment objectives and the value of the Funds’ investments.
This document may mention bond ratings published by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs) Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service, and Fitch, Inc. For securities rated by an NRSRO other than S&P, the rating is converted to the equivalent S&P credit rating. Bonds rated AAA are rated as having the highest quality and are generally considered to have the lowest degree of investment risk. Bonds rated AA are considered to be of high quality, but with a slightly higher degree of risk than bonds rated AAA. Bonds rated A are considered to have many favorable investment qualities, though they are somewhat more susceptible to adverse economic conditions. Bonds rated BBB are believed to be of medium-grade quality and generally riskier over the long term. Bonds rated BB, B, and CCC are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics, with BB indicating the least degree of speculation of the three.
The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index measures the total return performance of the long-term investment grade tax-exempt bond market.
Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs, or expenses. Indices are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index.
(continues) | 3 |
Table of Contents
Delaware Investments®
Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
As of March 31, 2020 (Unaudited)
Fund objective
The Fund seeks to provide current income exempt from both regular federal income tax and Colorado state income tax, consistent with the preservation of capital.
Total Fund net assets
$69 million
Number of holdings
120
Fund start date
July 29, 1993
NYSE American symbol
VCF
CUSIP number
246101109
Delaware Investments
Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc.
As of March 31, 2020 (Unaudited)
Fund objective
The Fund seeks to provide current income exempt from both regular federal income tax and Minnesota state personal income tax, consistent with the preservation of capital.
Total Fund net assets
$165 million
Number of holdings
208
Fund start date
Feb. 26, 1993
NYSE American symbol
VMM
CUSIP number
24610V103
Delaware Investments
National Municipal Income Fund
As of March 31, 2020 (Unaudited)
Fund objective
The Fund seeks to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax, consistent with the preservation of capital.
Total Fund net assets
$62 million
Number of holdings
174
Fund start date
Feb. 26, 1993
NYSE American symbol
VFL
CUSIP number
24610T108
4
Table of Contents
Security type / sector / state allocations
As of March 31, 2020 (Unaudited)
Sector designations may be different than the sector designations presented in other Fund materials.
Delaware Investments®
Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
Security type / sector | Percentage of net | |||
Municipal Bonds* | 139.53 | % | ||
Corporate Revenue Bonds | 5.38 | % | ||
Education Revenue Bonds | 20.55 | % | ||
Electric Revenue Bonds | 3.97 | % | ||
Healthcare Revenue Bonds | 37.90 | % | ||
Lease Revenue Bonds | 4.25 | % | ||
Local General Obligation Bonds | 15.34 | % | ||
Pre-Refunded/Escrowed to Maturity Bonds | 15.93 | % | ||
Special Tax Revenue Bonds | 21.71 | % | ||
State General Obligation Bonds | 1.85 | % | ||
Transportation Revenue Bonds | 9.62 | % | ||
Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds | 3.03 | % | ||
Short-Term Investment | 0.14 | % | ||
Total Value of Securities | 139.67 | % | ||
Liquidation Value of Preferred Stock | (43.30 | )% | ||
Receivables and Other Assets Net of Liabilities | 3.63 | % | ||
Total Net Assets | 100.00 | % | ||
* As of the date of this report, Delaware Investments Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc. held bonds issued by or on behalf of territories and the states of the US as follows: |
| |||
State / territory | Percentage of net assets | |||
Colorado | 128.57 | % | ||
Guam | 1.97 | % | ||
Puerto Rico | 9.13 | % | ||
Total Value of Securities | 139.67 | % |
Delaware Investments
Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc.
Security type / sector | Percentage of net | |||
Municipal Bonds* | 143.03 | % | ||
Corporate Revenue Bonds | 1.85 | % | ||
Education Revenue Bonds | 22.34 | % | ||
Electric Revenue Bonds | 15.68 | % | ||
Healthcare Revenue Bonds | 38.84 | % | ||
Housing Revenue Bonds | 1.73 | % | ||
Lease Revenue Bonds | 9.20 | % | ||
Local General Obligation Bonds | 15.91 | % | ||
Pre-Refunded/Escrowed to Maturity Bonds | 10.96 | % | ||
Special Tax Revenue Bonds | 3.10 | % | ||
State General Obligation Bonds | 12.35 | % | ||
Transportation Revenue Bonds | 7.86 | % | ||
Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds | 3.21 | % | ||
Short-Term Investment | 0.12 | % | ||
Total Value of Securities | 143.15 | % | ||
Liquidation Value of Preferred Stock | (45.57 | )% | ||
Receivables and Other Assets Net of Liabilities | 2.42 | % | ||
Total Net Assets | 100.00 | % | ||
* As of the date of this report, Delaware Investments Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc. held bonds issued by or on behalf of territories and the states of the US as follows: |
| |||
State / territory | Percentage of net assets | |||
Guam | 0.61 | % | ||
Minnesota | 138.66 | % | ||
Puerto Rico | 3.88 | % | ||
Total | 143.15 | % |
5
Table of Contents
Security type / sector / state allocations
Delaware Investments®
National Municipal Income Fund
Security type / sector | Percentage of net assets | |||
Municipal Bonds* | 142.36 | % | ||
Corporate Revenue Bonds | 17.04 | % | ||
Education Revenue Bonds | 22.78 | % | ||
Electric Revenue Bonds | 4.85 | % | ||
Healthcare Revenue Bonds | 32.76 | % | ||
Lease Revenue Bonds | 7.72 | % | ||
Local General Obligation Bonds | 2.11 | % | ||
Pre-Refunded/Escrowed to Maturity Bonds | 3.92 | % | ||
Special Tax Revenue Bonds | 15.96 | % | ||
State General Obligation Bonds | 11.56 | % | ||
Transportation Revenue Bonds | 22.44 | % | ||
Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds | 1.22 | % | ||
Short-Term Investments | 2.25 | % | ||
Total Value of Securities | 144.61 | % | ||
Liquidation Value of Preferred Stock | (48.32 | )% | ||
Receivables and Other Assets Net of Liabilities | 3.71 | % | ||
Total Net Assets | 100.00 | % |
* As of the date of this report, Delaware Investments National Municipal Income Fund held bonds issued by or on behalf of territories and the states of the US as follows:
State / territory | Percentage of net assets | |||
Alabama | 0.82 | % | ||
Arizona | 4.69 | % | ||
California | 19.14 | % | ||
Colorado | 4.09 | % | ||
District of Columbia | 1.82 | % | ||
Florida | 6.74 | % | ||
Georgia | 2.80 | % | ||
Guam | 0.85 | % | ||
Idaho | 2.64 | % | ||
Illinois | 14.42 | % | ||
Indiana | 0.92 | % | ||
Kansas | 0.36 | % | ||
Louisiana | 5.13 | % | ||
Maine | 0.51 | % | ||
Maryland | 1.27 | % | ||
Massachusetts | 0.90 | % | ||
Michigan | 1.84 | % | ||
Mississippi | 2.26 | % | ||
Missouri | 2.77 | % | ||
Montana | 1.10 | % | ||
Nebraska | 0.43 | % | ||
New Jersey | 9.13 | % | ||
New York | 14.99 | % | ||
Ohio | 4.95 | % | ||
Oregon | 0.92 | % | ||
Pennsylvania | 15.96 | % | ||
Puerto Rico | 7.87 | % | ||
Texas | 9.23 | % | ||
Utah | 1.16 | % | ||
Virginia | 1.27 | % | ||
Washington | 0.44 | % | ||
Wisconsin | 2.78 | % | ||
Wyoming | 0.41 | % | ||
Total Value of Securities | 144.61 | % |
6
Table of Contents
Delaware Investments® Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
March 31, 2020
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds – 139.53% |
| |||||||
Corporate Revenue Bonds – 5.38% |
| |||||||
Denver City & County (United Airlines Project) 5.00% 10/1/32 (AMT) | 215,000 | $ | 213,031 | |||||
Public Authority for Colorado Energy Natural Gas Revenue Series 2008 | 1,750,000 | 2,483,565 | ||||||
Public Authority for Colorado Energy Revenue | 865,000 | 1,031,149 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
3,727,745 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Education Revenue Bonds – 20.55% |
| |||||||
Board of Trustees For Colorado Mesa University Enterprise Revenue Series B 5.00% 5/15/49 | 750,000 | 919,507 | ||||||
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Revenue | ||||||||
144A 5.00% 7/1/36 # | 500,000 | 488,545 | ||||||
5.125% 11/1/49 | 765,000 | 809,064 | ||||||
144A 5.25% 7/1/46 # | 500,000 | 484,050 | ||||||
(Academy Charter School Project) | 1,720,000 | 1,724,644 | ||||||
(Alexander Dawson School-Nevada Project) 5.00% 5/15/29 | 760,000 | 880,863 | ||||||
(Charter School - Atlas Preparatory School) 144A 5.25% 4/1/45 # | 700,000 | 657,412 | ||||||
(Charter School - Community Leadership Academy) 7.45% 8/1/48 | 500,000 | 538,695 | ||||||
(Charter School - Peak to Peak Charter) | 1,000,000 | 1,101,310 | ||||||
(Improvement - Charter School - University Lab School Building) | 500,000 | 533,430 | ||||||
(Johnson & Wales University) Series A | 900,000 | 965,943 | ||||||
(Liberty Charter School) Series A 5.00% 1/15/44 | 1,000,000 | 1,067,640 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Education Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Revenue | ||||||||
(Littleton Charter School Project) | 1,200,000 | $ | 1,200,768 | |||||
(Loveland Classical Schools) 144A 5.00% 7/1/36 # | 625,000 | 608,675 | ||||||
(Science Technology Engineering and Math (Stem) School Project) 5.00% 11/1/54 | 700,000 | 733,250 | ||||||
(Skyview Charter School) 144A 5.50% 7/1/49 # | 750,000 | 747,765 | ||||||
(Vail Mountain School Project) 4.00% 5/1/46 | 25,000 | 23,759 | ||||||
(Windsor Charter Academy Project) 144A | 500,000 | 459,505 | ||||||
Colorado School of Mines Series B 5.00% 12/1/42 | 270,000 | 292,388 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
14,237,213 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Electric Revenue Bonds – 3.97% |
| |||||||
City of Fort Collins Electric Utility Enterprise Revenue Series A 5.00% 12/1/42 | 500,000 | 612,560 | ||||||
City of Loveland Colorado Electric & Communications Enterprise Revenue Series A 5.00% 12/1/44 | 1,060,000 | 1,292,373 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Revenue | ||||||||
Series A 5.05% 7/1/42 ‡ | 75,000 | 53,250 | ||||||
Series AAA | 40,000 | 28,500 | ||||||
Series CCC 5.25% 7/1/27 ‡ | 335,000 | 238,688 | ||||||
Series WW 5.00% 7/1/28 ‡ | 325,000 | 230,750 | ||||||
Series XX 4.75% 7/1/26 ‡ | 45,000 | 31,725 | ||||||
Series XX 5.25% 7/1/40 ‡ | 125,000 | 89,063 | ||||||
Series XX 5.75% 7/1/36 ‡ | 155,000 | 111,213 | ||||||
Series ZZ 4.75% 7/1/27 ‡ | 35,000 | 24,675 | ||||||
Series ZZ 5.25% 7/1/24 ‡ | 55,000 | 39,187 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,751,984 | ||||||||
|
|
(continues) | 7 |
Table of Contents
Schedules of investments
Delaware Investments® Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Healthcare Revenue Bonds – 37.90% |
| |||||||
Aurora Hospital Revenue (Children’s Hospital Association Project) Series A 5.00% 12/1/40 | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,010,500 | |||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Revenue (AdventHealth Obligated Group) Series A | 1,000,000 | 1,081,610 | ||||||
(Adventist Health System/Sunbelt Obligated Group) Series A | 1,000,000 | 1,114,530 | ||||||
(Bethesda Project) | 750,000 | 828,713 | ||||||
(Cappella of Grand Junction Project) 144A 5.00% 12/1/54 # | 515,000 | 435,592 | ||||||
(Christian Living Community Project) 6.375% 1/1/41 | 615,000 | 635,682 | ||||||
(CommonSpirit Health) | ||||||||
Series A-1 4.00% 8/1/39 | 500,000 | 520,955 | ||||||
Series A-2 4.00% 8/1/49 | 2,500,000 | 2,470,425 | ||||||
Series A-2 5.00% 8/1/38 | 1,500,000 | 1,639,695 | ||||||
Series A-2 5.00% 8/1/39 | 1,500,000 | 1,636,545 | ||||||
Series A-2 5.00% 8/1/44 | 500,000 | 540,300 | ||||||
(Covenant Retirement Communities Inc.) | ||||||||
5.00% 12/1/35 | 1,000,000 | 1,042,040 | ||||||
Series A 5.75% 12/1/36 | 1,000,000 | 1,076,790 | ||||||
(Frasier Meadows Retirement Community Project) | ||||||||
Series A 5.25% 5/15/37 | 265,000 | 255,985 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 5/15/48 | 340,000 | 297,803 | ||||||
(Healthcare Facilities – American Baptist) 8.00% 8/1/43 | 500,000 | 530,905 | ||||||
(Mental Health Center of Denver Project) Series A 5.75% 2/1/44 | 1,500,000 | 1,584,090 | ||||||
(National Jewish Health Project) 5.00% 1/1/27 | 500,000 | 520,250 | ||||||
(Sanford Health) Series A 5.00% 11/1/44 | 1,500,000 | 1,815,720 | ||||||
(SCL Health System) | ||||||||
Series A 4.00% 1/1/37 | 575,000 | 636,577 | ||||||
Series A 4.00% 1/1/38 | 1,950,000 | 2,146,619 | ||||||
Series A 4.00% 1/1/39 | 465,000 | 509,473 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Healthcare Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Revenue | ||||||||
(Sunny Vista Living Center) Series A 144A | 505,000 | $ | 519,463 | |||||
(Vail Valley Medical Center Project) 5.00% 1/15/35 | 1,250,000 | 1,482,750 | ||||||
(Valley View Hospital Association Project) Series A 4.00% 5/15/34 | 330,000 | 365,429 | ||||||
Denver Health & Hospital Authority Health Care Revenue | 500,000 | 557,320 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
26,255,761 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Lease Revenue Bonds – 4.25% |
| |||||||
Denver Health & Hospital Authority | 500,000 | 554,990 | ||||||
Pueblo County Certificates of Participation | 1,250,000 | 1,340,587 | ||||||
State of Colorado Department of Transportation Certificates of Participation | ||||||||
5.00% 6/15/34 | 340,000 | 402,665 | ||||||
5.00% 6/15/36 | 545,000 | 643,345 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,941,587 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Local General Obligation Bonds – 15.34% |
| |||||||
Adams & Weld Counties School District No 27J Brighton | 700,000 | 788,851 | ||||||
Arapahoe County School District No. 6 Littleton Series A | 650,000 | 828,041 | ||||||
Beacon Point Metropolitan District | 600,000 | 704,610 | ||||||
Boulder Valley School District No RE-2 Boulder | 500,000 | 568,275 |
8
Table of Contents
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Local General Obligation Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Denver International Business Center Metropolitan District No. 1 5.00% 12/1/30 | 650,000 | $ | 658,183 | |||||
Eaton Area Park & Recreation District | ||||||||
5.25% 12/1/34 | 190,000 | 192,956 | ||||||
5.50% 12/1/38 | 245,000 | 250,084 | ||||||
Grand River Hospital District | 675,000 | 838,661 | ||||||
Jefferson County School District No. R-1 | 750,000 | 889,133 | ||||||
Sierra Ridge Metropolitan District No. 2 Series A 5.50% 12/1/46 | 500,000 | 496,280 | ||||||
Weld County School District No. RE-1 | 500,000 | 605,875 | ||||||
Weld County School District No. RE-2 Eaton Series 2 5.00% 12/1/44 | 1,250,000 | 1,571,000 | ||||||
Weld County School District No. RE-3J | 1,000,000 | 1,200,500 | ||||||
Weld County School District No. RE-8 | ||||||||
5.00% 12/1/31 | 510,000 | 621,404 | ||||||
5.00% 12/1/32 | 340,000 | 413,549 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
10,627,402 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Pre-Refunded/Escrowed to Maturity Bonds – 15.93% |
| |||||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Revenue | ||||||||
(Catholic Health Initiatives) Series A 5.00% 2/1/41-21§ | 2,400,000 | 2,463,984 | ||||||
(Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society) | ||||||||
5.00% 6/1/28-23§ | 1,250,000 | 1,393,300 | ||||||
5.50% 6/1/33-23§ | 2,000,000 | 2,260,180 | ||||||
5.625% 6/1/43-23§ | 1,000,000 | 1,133,950 | ||||||
Colorado School of Mines Series B | 1,115,000 | 1,227,905 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Pre-Refunded/Escrowed to Maturity Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Regional Transportation District Sales Tax Revenue (FasTracks Project) Series A 5.00% 11/1/38-20§ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,557,575 | |||||
|
| |||||||
11,036,894 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Special Tax Revenue Bonds – 21.71% |
| |||||||
Central Platte Valley Metropolitan District | 375,000 | 379,856 | ||||||
Commerce City | 1,000,000 | 1,120,580 | ||||||
Fountain Urban Renewal Authority Tax Increment Revenue | 655,000 | 641,998 | ||||||
Guam Government Business Privilege Tax Revenue | ||||||||
Series A 5.125% 1/1/42 | 435,000 | 431,372 | ||||||
Series A 5.25% 1/1/36 | 565,000 | 569,153 | ||||||
Lincoln Park Metropolitan District 5.00% 12/1/46 (AGM) | 500,000 | 592,175 | ||||||
Prairie Center Metropolitan District No. 3 Series A 144A 5.00% 12/15/41 # | 500,000 | 481,375 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Revenue (Restructured) | ||||||||
Series A-1 4.55% 7/1/40 | 1,000,000 | 949,150 | ||||||
Series A-1 4.75% 7/1/53 | 2,290,000 | 2,162,126 | ||||||
Series A-1 5.00% 7/1/58 | 1,110,000 | 1,082,195 | ||||||
Regional Transportation District Revenue | ||||||||
Series A 5.375% 6/1/31 | 460,000 | 463,077 | ||||||
(Denver Transit Partners) 6.00% 1/15/41 | 2,175,000 | 2,188,311 | ||||||
Regional Transportation District Sales Tax Revenue (FasTracks Project) | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 11/1/30 | 330,000 | 401,993 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 11/1/31 | 755,000 | 917,604 | ||||||
Solaris Metropolitan District No. 3 | 500,000 | 504,100 |
(continues) | 9 |
Table of Contents
Schedules of investments
Delaware Investments® Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) | ||||||||
Special Tax Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Southlands Metropolitan District No. 1 | ||||||||
Series A1 5.00% 12/1/37 | 200,000 | $ | 206,166 | |||||
Series A1 5.00% 12/1/47 | 300,000 | 304,368 | ||||||
Sterling Ranch Community Authority Board | 525,000 | 539,406 | ||||||
Tallyn’s Reach Metropolitan District No. 3 (Limited Tax Convertible) | 295,000 | 295,614 | ||||||
Thornton Development Authority | ||||||||
Series B 5.00% 12/1/35 | 265,000 | 304,151 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 12/1/36 | 440,000 | 504,583 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
15,039,353 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
State General Obligation Bonds – 1.85% |
| |||||||
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 7/1/41 ‡ | 305,000 | 186,050 | ||||||
Series A 5.375% 7/1/33 ‡ | 305,000 | 207,781 | ||||||
Series A 8.00% 7/1/35 ‡ | 535,000 | 322,337 | ||||||
Series B 5.75% 7/1/38 ‡ | 440,000 | 294,800 | ||||||
Series C 6.00% 7/1/39 ‡ | 400,000 | 272,000 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,282,968 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Transportation Revenue Bonds – 9.62% |
| |||||||
Colorado High Performance Transportation Enterprise Revenue | 1,110,000 | 1,148,872 | ||||||
C-470 Express Lanes 5.00% 12/31/56 | 1,000,000 | 1,015,960 | ||||||
Denver City & County Airport System Revenue | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 11/15/30 (AMT) | 750,000 | 887,805 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 12/1/48 (AMT) | 1,000,000 | 1,150,250 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 11/15/37 | 2,000,000 | 2,150,440 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Transportation Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
E-470 Public Highway Authority | 310,000 | $ | 314,607 | |||||
|
| |||||||
6,667,934 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds – 3.03% |
| |||||||
Arapahoe County Water & Wastewater Authority Revenue | 1,250,000 | 1,477,875 | ||||||
Dominion Water & Sanitation District, Colorado | 250,000 | 260,203 | ||||||
Guam Government Waterworks Authority Revenue | 360,000 | 362,912 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,100,990 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Municipal Bonds | 96,669,831 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Short-Term Investment – 0.14% |
| |||||||
Variable Rate Demand Note – 0.14%¤ |
| |||||||
Denver City & County | 100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Short-Term Investment | 100,000 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Value of Securities – 139.67% | $ | 96,769,831 | ||||||
|
|
# | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. At March 31, 2020, the aggregate value of Rule 144A securities was $4,882,382, which represents 7.05% of the Fund’s net assets. See Note 7 in “Notes to financial statements.” |
¤ | Tax-exempt obligations that contain a floating or variable interest rate adjustment formula and an unconditional right of demand to receive payment of the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest upon a short notice period (generally up to 30 days) prior to specified dates either from the issuer or by drawing on a bank letter of credit, a guarantee, or insurance issued with respect to such instrument. Each rate shown is as of March 31, 2020. |
10
Table of Contents
§ | Pre-refunded bonds. Municipal bonds that are generally backed or secured by US Treasury bonds. For pre-refunded bonds, the stated maturity is followed by the year in which the bond will be pre-refunded. See Note 7 in “Notes to financial statements.” |
° | Principal amount shown is stated in USD unless noted that the security is denominated in another currency. |
‡ | Non-income producing security. Security is currently in default. |
Summary of abbreviations:
AGC – Insured by Assured Guaranty Corporation
AGM – Insured by Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation
AMT – Subject to Alternative Minimum Tax
BAM – Build America Mutual Assurance Company
N.A. – National Association
SPA – Stand-by Purchase Agreement
USD – US Dollar
See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of the financial statements.
11 |
Table of Contents
Schedules of investments
Delaware Investments® Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc.
March 31, 2020
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds – 143.03% |
| |||||||
Corporate Revenue Bonds – 1.85% |
| |||||||
Minneapolis Community Planning & Economic Development Department (Limited Tax Supported Common Bond Fund) 6.25% 12/1/30 | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,032,800 | |||||
St. Paul Port Authority Solid Waste Disposal Revenue (Gerdau St. Paul Steel Mill Project) Series 7 144A 4.50% 10/1/37 (AMT) # | 2,100,000 | 2,006,823 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
3,039,623 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Education Revenue Bonds – 22.34% |
| |||||||
Bethel Charter School Lease Revenue (Spectrum High School Project) Series A 4.375% 7/1/52 | 1,100,000 | 1,124,651 | ||||||
Brooklyn Park Charter School Lease Revenue | ||||||||
(Prairie Seeds Academy Project) | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 3/1/34 | 990,000 | 901,791 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 3/1/39 | 170,000 | 147,285 | ||||||
Cologne Charter School Lease Revenue | ||||||||
(Cologne Academy Project) | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 7/1/29 | 270,000 | 276,510 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 7/1/45 | 445,000 | 434,365 | ||||||
Deephaven Charter School | ||||||||
(Eagle Ridge Academy Project) | ||||||||
Series A 5.25% 7/1/37 | 590,000 | 602,142 | ||||||
Series A 5.25% 7/1/40 | 500,000 | 507,510 | ||||||
Duluth Housing & Redevelopment Authority (Duluth Public Schools Academy Project) Series A 5.00% 11/1/48 | 1,200,000 | 1,133,772 | ||||||
Forest Lake Minnesota Charter School Revenue | ||||||||
(Lake International Language Academy) | ||||||||
Series A 5.375% 8/1/50 | 915,000 | 911,532 | ||||||
Series A 5.75% 8/1/44 | 705,000 | 722,547 | ||||||
Hugo Charter School Lease Revenue | 255,000 | 254,209 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Education Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Hugo Charter School Lease Revenue | 775,000 | $ | 732,297 | |||||
Minneapolis Charter School Lease Revenue | ||||||||
(Hiawatha Academies Project) | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 7/1/36 | 750,000 | 751,537 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 7/1/47 | 900,000 | 873,855 | ||||||
Minneapolis Student Housing Revenue | ||||||||
(Riverton Community Housing Project) | ||||||||
5.25% 8/1/39 | 205,000 | 207,595 | ||||||
5.50% 8/1/49 | 990,000 | 1,008,216 | ||||||
Minnesota Higher Education Facilities Authority Revenue (Bethel University) | 1,250,000 | 1,308,987 | ||||||
(Carleton College) | ||||||||
4.00% 3/1/36 | 485,000 | 550,039 | ||||||
5.00% 3/1/44 | 905,000 | 1,082,299 | ||||||
(College of St. Benedict) | ||||||||
4.00% 3/1/36 | 410,000 | 409,537 | ||||||
(Gustavus Adolphus College) 5.00% 10/1/47 | 2,600,000 | 2,934,490 | ||||||
(Macalester College) | ||||||||
4.00% 3/1/42 | 900,000 | 994,023 | ||||||
4.00% 3/1/48 | 600,000 | 658,362 | ||||||
(St. Catherine University) | ||||||||
Series A 4.00% 10/1/38 | 920,000 | 921,334 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 10/1/45 | 785,000 | 849,237 | ||||||
(St. Johns University) | ||||||||
Series 8-I 5.00% 10/1/31 | 235,000 | 266,203 | ||||||
Series 8-I 5.00% 10/1/34 | 35,000 | 39,141 | ||||||
(St. Olaf College) Series 8-N 4.00% 10/1/35 | 590,000 | 657,289 | ||||||
(Trustees Of The Hamline University Of Minnesota) | ||||||||
Series B 5.00% 10/1/47 | 1,055,000 | 1,104,005 | ||||||
(University of St. Thomas) | ||||||||
4.00% 10/1/32 | 250,000 | 279,507 | ||||||
4.00% 10/1/44 | 645,000 | 695,091 | ||||||
5.00% 10/1/40 | 750,000 | 877,057 | ||||||
Series 7-U 5.00% 4/1/22 | 750,000 | 797,325 |
12
Table of Contents
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) | ||||||||
Education Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Minnesota Higher Education Facilities Authority Revenue | 500,000 | $ | 540,100 | |||||
Otsego Charter School | ||||||||
(Kaleidoscope Charter School) | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 9/1/34 | 230,000 | 219,967 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 9/1/44 | 400,000 | 357,988 | ||||||
Rice County Educational Facilities Revenue (Shattuck-St. Mary’s School) Series A 144A 5.00% 8/1/22 # | 1,250,000 | 1,262,050 | ||||||
St. Cloud Charter School Lease Revenue (Stride Academy Project) Series A 5.00% 4/1/46 | 375,000 | 255,000 | ||||||
St. Paul Housing & Redevelopment Authority Charter School Lease Revenue | 825,000 | 716,438 | ||||||
(Great River School Project) | ||||||||
Series A 144A 4.75% 7/1/29 # | 200,000 | 198,510 | ||||||
Series A 144A 5.50% 7/1/38 # | 240,000 | 237,257 | ||||||
(Nova Classical Academy Project) | ||||||||
Series A 4.125% 9/1/47 | 750,000 | 750,975 | ||||||
Series A 6.375% 9/1/31 | 750,000 | 788,138 | ||||||
(Twin Cities Academy Project) Series A 5.30% 7/1/45 | 630,000 | 625,609 | ||||||
University of Minnesota | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 9/1/40 | 1,240,000 | 1,507,518 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 9/1/42 | 2,000,000 | 2,423,260 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 4/1/44 | 1,500,000 | 1,871,745 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
36,768,295 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Electric Revenue Bonds – 15.68% |
| |||||||
Central Minnesota Municipal Power Agency Revenue (Brookings Southeast Twin Cities Transportation) | 1,130,000 | 1,201,506 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Electric Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Central Minnesota Municipal Power Agency Revenue (Brookings Twin Cities Transmission Project) 5.00% 1/1/42 | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,058,810 | |||||
Chaska Electric Revenue Series A 5.00% 10/1/28 | 445,000 | 522,350 | ||||||
Minnesota Municipal Power Agency Electric Revenue | ||||||||
5.00% 10/1/25 | 500,000 | 577,535 | ||||||
5.00% 10/1/26 | 500,000 | 576,590 | ||||||
5.00% 10/1/27 | 320,000 | 367,814 | ||||||
5.00% 10/1/47 | 1,755,000 | 2,044,961 | ||||||
Northern Municipal Power Agency | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 1/1/26 | 100,000 | 109,438 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 1/1/30 | 340,000 | 369,974 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Revenue | ||||||||
Series A 5.05% 7/1/42 ‡ | 175,000 | 124,250 | ||||||
Series AAA 5.25% 7/1/25 ‡ | 100,000 | 71,250 | ||||||
Series CCC 5.25% 7/1/27 ‡ | 800,000 | 570,000 | ||||||
Series WW 5.00% 7/1/28 ‡ | 770,000 | 546,700 | ||||||
Series XX 4.75% 7/1/26 ‡ | 105,000 | 74,025 | ||||||
Series XX 5.25% 7/1/40 ‡ | 300,000 | 213,750 | ||||||
Series XX 5.75% 7/1/36 ‡ | 375,000 | 269,063 | ||||||
Series ZZ 4.75% 7/1/27 ‡ | 85,000 | 59,925 | ||||||
Series ZZ 5.25% 7/1/24 ‡ | 140,000 | 99,750 | ||||||
Rochester Electric Utility Revenue | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 12/1/42 | 605,000 | 711,165 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 12/1/47 | 985,000 | 1,153,849 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 12/1/30 | 1,300,000 | 1,459,094 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 12/1/43 | 1,000,000 | 1,117,070 | ||||||
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency Supply Revenue | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 1/1/41 | 240,000 | 276,149 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 1/1/47 | 1,650,000 | 1,963,484 | ||||||
St. Paul Housing & Redevelopment Authority Charter School Lease Revenue | ||||||||
Series A 4.00% 10/1/33 | 285,000 | 317,846 | ||||||
Series B 4.00% 10/1/37 | 800,000 | 879,488 |
(continues) | 13 |
Table of Contents
Schedules of investments
Delaware Investments® Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc.
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Electric Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Western Minnesota Municipal Power Agency Supply Revenue | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 1/1/25 | 3,000,000 | $ | 3,299,340 | |||||
Series A 5.00% 1/1/26 | 1,000,000 | 1,098,930 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 1/1/49 | 3,860,000 | 4,675,000 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
25,809,106 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Healthcare Revenue Bonds – 38.84% |
| |||||||
Anoka Health Care Facilities Revenue 5.375% 11/1/34 | 610,000 | 611,074 | ||||||
Apple Valley Senior Housing Revenue | ||||||||
(PHS Senior Housing, Inc. Orchard Path Project) | ||||||||
4.50% 9/1/53 | 1,160,000 | 1,082,245 | ||||||
5.00% 9/1/58 | 1,605,000 | 1,607,953 | ||||||
Apple Valley Senior Living Revenue | ||||||||
(Senior Living LLC Project) | ||||||||
Series B 5.00% 1/1/47 | 750,000 | 488,445 | ||||||
Series D 7.00% 1/1/37 | 720,000 | 590,076 | ||||||
Series D 7.25% 1/1/52 | 1,000,000 | 786,720 | ||||||
Bethel Housing & Health Care Facilities Revenue (Benedictine Health System- St. Peter Communities Project) Series A 5.50% 12/1/48 | 500,000 | 440,605 | ||||||
Center City Health Care Facilities Revenue (Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation Project) 5.00% 11/1/27 | 500,000 | 561,110 | ||||||
City of Bethel (The Lodge at Lakes at Stillwater Project) 5.25% 6/1/58 | 1,775,000 | 1,774,876 | ||||||
City of Center City, Minnesota Healthcare Facilities Revenue Refunding (Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation Project) 4.00% 11/1/41 | 200,000 | 219,756 | ||||||
City of Crookston, Minnesota Health Care Facilities Revenue (Riverview Health Project) 5.00% 5/1/51 | 1,390,000 | 1,500,088 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Healthcare Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Cloquet Housing Facilities Revenue | 500,000 | $ | 454,305 | |||||
Dakota County Community Development Agency Senior Housing Revenue | ||||||||
(Walker Highview Hills Project) | ||||||||
Series A 144A 5.00% 8/1/46 # | 370,000 | 367,828 | ||||||
Series A 144A 5.00% 8/1/51 # | 755,000 | 738,579 | ||||||
Deephaven Housing & Healthcare Revenue | ||||||||
(St. Therese Senior Living Project) | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 4/1/38 | 280,000 | 249,438 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 4/1/40 | 270,000 | 238,510 | ||||||
Duluth Economic Development Authority (Essentia Health Obligated Group) Series A 5.00% 2/15/48 | 1,810,000 | 2,086,586 | ||||||
(St. Luke’s Hospital Authority Obligation Group) | ||||||||
5.75% 6/15/32 | 2,000,000 | 2,111,440 | ||||||
6.00% 6/15/39 | 1,000,000 | 1,056,450 | ||||||
Hayward | 500,000 | 468,590 | ||||||
Hayward Health Care Facilities Revenue | 260,000 | 235,271 | ||||||
Maple Grove Health Care Facilities Revenue | 1,000,000 | 1,059,170 | ||||||
(North Memorial Health Care) 5.00% 9/1/30 | 865,000 | 1,004,663 | ||||||
Maple Plain Senior Housing & Health Care Revenue (Haven Homes Project) 5.00% 7/1/54 | 1,500,000 | 1,440,555 | ||||||
Minneapolis Health Care System Revenue |
14
Table of Contents
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Healthcare Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
(Fairview Health Services) | ||||||||
Series A 4.00% 11/15/48 | 2,855,000 | $ | 3,139,815 | |||||
Series A 5.00% 11/15/33 | 500,000 | 588,605 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 11/15/34 | 500,000 | 587,255 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 11/15/49 | 2,000,000 | 2,384,660 | ||||||
Minneapolis Senior Housing & Healthcare Revenue | ||||||||
(Ecumen Mill City Quarter) | ||||||||
5.25% 11/1/45 | 850,000 | 827,789 | ||||||
5.375% 11/1/50 | 200,000 | 196,600 | ||||||
(Ecumen-Abiitan Mill City Project) 5.00% 11/1/35 | 220,000 | 217,413 | ||||||
Minneapolis – St. Paul Housing & Redevelopment Authority Health Care Revenue (Allina Health System) Series A 5.00% 11/15/29 | 585,000 | 717,140 | ||||||
Rochester Health Care & Housing Revenue | 1,220,000 | 1,250,085 | ||||||
Rochester Health Care Facilities Revenue | 4,860,000 | 5,083,852 | ||||||
Sartell Health Care Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(Country Manor Campus Project) | ||||||||
5.25% 9/1/30 | 1,000,000 | 1,004,000 | ||||||
Series A 5.30% 9/1/37 | 600,000 | 603,690 | ||||||
Shakopee Health Care Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(St. Francis Regional Medical Center) | ||||||||
4.00% 9/1/31 | 205,000 | 219,510 | ||||||
5.00% 9/1/34 | 165,000 | 183,761 | ||||||
St. Cloud Health Care Revenue | ||||||||
(Centracare Health System Project) | ||||||||
4.00% 5/1/49 | 1,585,000 | 1,704,351 | ||||||
5.00% 5/1/48 | 3,150,000 | 3,690,131 | ||||||
St. Cloud Health Care Revenue |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Healthcare Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
(Centracare Health System Project) | ||||||||
Series A 4.00% 5/1/37 | 1,295,000 | $ | 1,408,986 | |||||
Series A 5.00% 5/1/46 | 4,800,000 | 5,429,808 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 5/1/24 | 1,400,000 | 1,599,948 | ||||||
(Unrefunded – Centracare Health System Project) | ||||||||
5.125% 5/1/30 | 95,000 | 95,275 | ||||||
St. Paul Housing & Redevelopment Authority Health Care Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
Series A 4.00% 11/15/43 | 905,000 | 1,003,536 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 11/15/47 | 680,000 | 803,583 | ||||||
(Health Partners Obligation Group Project) | ||||||||
5.00% 7/1/29 | 2,000,000 | 2,326,420 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 7/1/32 | 1,100,000 | 1,262,261 | ||||||
St. Paul Housing & Redevelopment Authority Housing & Health Care Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(Senior Episcopal Homes Project) | ||||||||
5.125% 5/1/48 | 1,200,000 | 1,061,160 | ||||||
Series A 4.75% 11/1/31 | 740,000 | 673,925 | ||||||
Wayzata Senior Housing Revenue | ||||||||
(Folkestone Senior Living Community) | ||||||||
3.75% 8/1/37 | 500,000 | 447,935 | ||||||
4.00% 8/1/38 | 250,000 | 229,508 | ||||||
4.00% 8/1/44 | 350,000 | 306,401 | ||||||
5.00% 8/1/54 | 400,000 | 398,020 | ||||||
Winona Health Care Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(Winona Health Obligation) | ||||||||
4.65% 7/1/26 | 465,000 | 476,876 | ||||||
4.75% 7/1/27 | 785,000 | 806,242 | ||||||
5.00% 7/1/34 | 750,000 | 770,993 | ||||||
Woodbury Housing & Redevelopment Authority Revenue | 1,250,000 | 1,253,763 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
63,927,630 | ||||||||
|
|
(continues) | 15 |
Table of Contents
Schedules of investments
Delaware Investments® Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc.
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Housing Revenue Bonds – 1.73% |
| |||||||
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency | 1,390,000 | $ | 1,589,215 | |||||
Minnesota State Housing Finance Agency Homeownership (Mortgage-Backed Securities Program) 4.40% 7/1/32 (GNMA) (FNMA) | 675,000 | 693,468 | ||||||
Northwest Multi-County Housing & Redevelopment Authority (Pooled Housing Program) 5.50% 7/1/45 | 560,000 | 570,987 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,853,670 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Lease Revenue Bonds – 9.20% |
| |||||||
Minnesota State General Fund Revenue Appropriations | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 6/1/32 | 780,000 | 857,852 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 6/1/38 | 5,500,000 | 6,004,515 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 6/1/43 | 1,750,000 | 1,902,093 | ||||||
Minnesota State Housing Finance Agency (Non Ace – State Appropriated Housing) Series C 5.00% 8/1/36 | 1,000,000 | 1,139,270 | ||||||
University of Minnesota Special Purpose Revenue | ||||||||
(State Supported Biomed Science Research) | ||||||||
5.00% 8/1/35 | 1,040,000 | 1,052,386 | ||||||
5.00% 8/1/36 | 4,000,000 | 4,189,080 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
15,145,196 | ||||||||
|
|
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Local General Obligation Bonds – 15.91% |
| |||||||
Brainerd Independent School District No. 181 | ||||||||
(General Obligation School Building Bonds) | ||||||||
Series A 4.00% 2/1/38 | 1,500,000 | $ | 1,672,920 | |||||
Series A 4.00% 2/1/43 | 1,500,000 | 1,659,255 | ||||||
Burnsville-Eagan-Savage Independent School District No. 191 (Alternative Facilities) Series A 4.00% 2/1/28 | 1,185,000 | 1,313,750 | ||||||
Duluth Independent School District No. 709 | 600,000 | 671,886 | ||||||
Duluth, Minnesota (Improvement DECC) Series A 5.00% 2/1/34 | 545,000 | 641,825 | ||||||
Edina Independent School District No. 273 | 1,500,000 | 1,760,115 | ||||||
Hennepin County | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 12/1/36 | 1,190,000 | 1,437,377 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 12/1/37 | 1,240,000 | 1,536,323 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 12/1/41 | 1,060,000 | 1,267,071 | ||||||
Hopkins Independent School District No. 270 Series A 5.00% 2/1/28 | 1,000,000 | 1,030,700 | ||||||
Mahtomedi Independent School District No. 832 (School Building) Series A 5.00% 2/1/28 | 515,000 | 603,513 | ||||||
Minneapolis Special School District No. 1 | ||||||||
Series A 4.00% 2/1/36 | 190,000 | 220,358 | ||||||
Series A 4.00% 2/1/37 | 250,000 | 289,120 | ||||||
Series A 4.00% 2/1/38 | 260,000 | 299,523 | ||||||
Series B 4.00% 2/1/36 | 400,000 | 463,912 | ||||||
Series B 4.00% 2/1/37 | 530,000 | 612,934 | ||||||
Series B 4.00% 2/1/38 | 550,000 | 633,605 | ||||||
Mounds View Independent School District No. 621 (School Building) Series A 4.00% 2/1/43 | 2,000,000 | 2,220,360 | ||||||
St. Michael-Albertville Independent School District No. 885 | 1,300,000 | 1,554,826 |
16
Table of Contents
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Local General Obligation Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
St. Paul Independent School District No. 625 (School Building) Series B 5.00% 2/1/26 | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,102,660 | |||||
White Bear Lake Independent School District No. 624 | 2,595,000 | 2,705,417 | ||||||
Willmar | 2,440,000 | 2,480,187 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
26,177,637 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Pre-Refunded/Escrowed to Maturity Bonds – 10.96% |
| |||||||
Dakota-Washington Counties Housing & Redevelopment Authority Single Family Residential Mortgage Revenue | 7,055,000 | 7,712,032 | ||||||
Deephaven Charter School (Eagle Ridge Academy Project) Series A 5.50% 7/1/43-23 § | 500,000 | 566,720 | ||||||
Minneapolis – St. Paul Housing & Redevelopment Authority Health Care Revenue (Children’s Health Care Facilities) Series A1 5.00% 8/15/34-20 (AGM) § | 500,000 | 507,145 | ||||||
Minnesota Higher Education Facilities Authority Revenue | 700,000 | 767,431 | ||||||
St. Paul Housing & Redevelopment Authority Hospital Facility | ||||||||
(Healtheast Care System Project) | �� | |||||||
Series A 5.00% 11/15/29-25 § | 395,000 | 475,375 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 11/15/30-25 § | 290,000 | 349,009 | ||||||
University of Minnesota | ||||||||
Series D 5.00% 12/1/36-21 § | 2,655,000 | 2,827,495 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Pre-Refunded/Escrowed to Maturity Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Western Minnesota Municipal Power Agency Supply Revenue | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,138,420 | |||||
Series A 5.00% | 750,000 | 853,815 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% | 2,500,000 | 2,846,050 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
18,043,492 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Special Tax Revenue Bonds – 3.10% |
| |||||||
Guam Government Business Privilege Tax Revenue Series A 5.25% 1/1/36 | 150,000 | 151,103 | ||||||
Minneapolis Revenue (YMCA Greater Twin Cities Project) 4.00% 6/1/29 | 165,000 | 184,666 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Revenue (Restructured) | ||||||||
Series A-1 4.55% 7/1/40 | 1,250,000 | 1,186,437 | ||||||
Series A-1 4.75% 7/1/53 | 1,000,000 | 944,160 | ||||||
Series A-1 5.00% 7/1/58 | 1,600,000 | 1,559,920 | ||||||
St. Paul Sales Tax Revenue | 935,000 | 1,073,090 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
5,099,376 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
State General Obligation Bonds – 12.35% |
| |||||||
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico | 985,000 | 659,950 | ||||||
Minnesota State | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 8/1/29 | 700,000 | 834,505 | ||||||
Series E 5.00% 10/1/26 | 1,480,000 | 1,830,286 | ||||||
(State Trunk Highway) | ||||||||
Series B 5.00% 10/1/22 | 5,500,000 | 5,820,595 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 10/1/29 | 3,315,000 | 3,499,049 | ||||||
Minnesota State | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 8/1/38 | 500,000 | 627,020 | ||||||
Series D 5.00% 8/1/24 | 2,635,000 | 2,668,675 | ||||||
Series F 5.00% 10/1/22 | 4,000,000 | 4,386,280 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
20,326,360 | ||||||||
|
|
(continues) | 17 |
Table of Contents
Schedules of investments
Delaware Investments® Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc.
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Transportation Revenue Bonds – 7.86% |
| |||||||
Minneapolis – St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission Revenue (Subordinate) | ||||||||
Series A 5.00% 1/1/31 | 410,000 | $ | 489,905 | |||||
Series A 5.00% 1/1/32 | 1,255,000 | 1,496,261 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 1/1/49 | 2,000,000 | 2,399,940 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 1/1/26 | 540,000 | 569,738 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 1/1/26 (AMT) | 500,000 | 549,850 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 1/1/27 | 1,190,000 | 1,255,533 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 1/1/30 | 500,000 | 527,005 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 1/1/31 | 250,000 | 263,547 | ||||||
Series C 5.00% 1/1/33 | 2,000,000 | 2,379,920 | ||||||
Series C 5.00% 1/1/36 | 1,000,000 | 1,180,040 | ||||||
Series C 5.00% 1/1/46 | 1,245,000 | 1,444,673 | ||||||
St. Paul Port Authority Revenue | 380,000 | 382,675 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
12,939,087 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds – 3.21% |
| |||||||
Guam Government Waterworks Authority 5.00% 7/1/40 | 840,000 | 846,796 | ||||||
Metropolitan Council Waste Water Revenue | ||||||||
Series B 4.00% 9/1/27 | 1,145,000 | 1,220,891 | ||||||
Series C 4.00% 3/1/31 | 1,355,000 | 1,578,074 | ||||||
Series C 4.00% 3/1/32 | 1,405,000 | 1,630,727 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
5,276,488 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Municipal Bonds | 235,405,960 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Short-Term Investment – 0.12% |
| |||||||
Variable Rate Demand Note – 0.12%¤ |
| |||||||
Minneapolis Health Care System Revenue Series C | 200,000 | 200,000 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Short-Term Investment | 200,000 | |||||||
|
|
Total Value of Securities – 143.15% | $ | 235,605,960 | ||||||
|
|
# | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. At March 31, 2020, the aggregate value of Rule 144A securities was $4,811,047, which represents 2.92% of the Fund’s net assets. See Note 7 in “Notes to financial statements.” |
¤ | Tax-exempt obligations that contain a floating or variable interest rate adjustment formula and an unconditional right of demand to receive payment of the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest upon a short notice period (generally up to 30 days) prior to specified dates either from the issuer or by drawing on a bank letter of credit, a guarantee, or insurance issued with respect to such instrument. Each rate shown is as of March 31, 2020. |
§ | Pre-refunded bonds. Municipal bonds that are generally backed or secured by US Treasury bonds. For pre-refunded bonds, the stated maturity is followed by the year in which the bond will be pre-refunded. See Note 7 in “Notes to financial statements.” |
° | Principal amount shown is stated in USD unless noted that the security is denominated in another currency. |
‡ | Non-income producing security. Security is currently in default. |
Summary of abbreviations:
AGM – Insured by Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation
AMT – Subject to Alternative Minimum Tax
FNMA – Federal National Mortgage Association Collateral
GNMA – Government National Mortgage Association Collateral
LOC – Letter of Credit
N.A. – National Association
USD – United States Dollar
See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of the financial statements.
18
Table of Contents
Delaware Investments® National Municipal Income Fund
March 31, 2020
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds – 142.36% |
| |||||||
Corporate Revenue Bonds – 17.04% |
| |||||||
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority | 1,000,000 | $ | 936,480 | |||||
SeriesA-2 4.00% 6/1/48 | 1,000,000 | 1,073,400 | ||||||
Central Plains Energy Project Revenue, Nebraska | 225,000 | 267,228 | ||||||
Commonwealth Financing Authority Revenue, Pennsylvania | 1,015,000 | 1,106,563 | ||||||
Florida Development Finance Surface Transportation Facilities Revenue | 475,000 | 420,057 | ||||||
Golden State Tobacco Securitization, California | 250,000 | 240,575 | ||||||
Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority | 645,000 | 646,529 | ||||||
Series A-1 6.50% 11/1/35 | 255,000 | 255,566 | ||||||
M-S-R Energy Authority, California Gas | 250,000 | 350,245 | ||||||
Series C 7.00% 11/1/34 | 1,000,000 | 1,385,050 | ||||||
New York Liberty Development Revenue | 250,000 | 238,705 | ||||||
2.80% 9/15/69 | 630,000 | 601,518 | ||||||
New York Transportation Development | 750,000 | 712,507 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Corporate Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Shoals, Indiana | 310,000 | $ | 323,308 | |||||
Suffolk County, New York Tobacco Asset Securitization | 750,000 | 768,173 | ||||||
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, Louisiana Asset-Backed Note | 460,000 | 488,304 | ||||||
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, New Jersey | 130,000 | 133,186 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 6/1/46 | 335,000 | 322,903 | ||||||
TSASC Revenue, New York | 60,000 | 62,905 | ||||||
Valparaiso, Indiana | 240,000 | 249,547 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
10,582,749 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Education Revenue Bonds – 22.78% |
| |||||||
Arizona Industrial Development Authority Revenue | 330,000 | 340,514 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority Revenue | 500,000 | 557,335 | ||||||
(Stanford University) Series V-1 5.00% 5/1/49 | 1,000,000 | 1,543,570 | ||||||
East Hempfield Township, Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority | 1,000,000 | 1,045,050 | ||||||
Health & Educational Facilities Authority of the State of Missouri | 500,000 | 528,030 |
(continues) | 19 |
Table of Contents
Schedules of investments
Delaware Investments® National Municipal Income Fund
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Education Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Revenue | 460,000 | $ | 493,037 | |||||
(Chicago International Charter School Project) 5.00% 12/1/47 | 535,000 | 561,049 | ||||||
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority Revenue | 500,000 | 569,005 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | 285,000 | 295,838 | ||||||
New Hope, Texas Cultural Education Facilities | 1,000,000 | 1,049,520 | ||||||
New York City, New York Trust For Cultural Resources | 500,000 | 513,700 | ||||||
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Authority for Industrial Development | 370,000 | 401,021 | ||||||
Phoenix, Arizona Industrial Development Authority Revenue | 1,000,000 | 1,042,230 | ||||||
Pima County, Arizona Industrial Development Authority Education Revenue | 500,000 | 433,565 | ||||||
Private Colleges & Universities Authority Revenue, Georgia | 135,000 | 138,744 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Education Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Swarthmore Borough Authority, Pennsylvania | 490,000 | $ | 550,706 | |||||
Troy, New York Capital Resource Revenue | 600,000 | 608,706 | ||||||
University of California Series AI 5.00% 5/15/32 | 1,000,000 | 1,102,960 | ||||||
Series AZ 5.25% 5/15/58 | 465,000 | 567,900 | ||||||
University of Texas System Revenue Financing System Bonds | 1,000,000 | 1,545,700 | ||||||
Wyoming Community Development Authority Student Housing Revenue | 250,000 | 257,043 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
14,145,223 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Electric Revenue Bonds – 4.85% |
| |||||||
JEA Electric System Revenue, Florida | 355,000 | 395,019 | ||||||
Long Island Power Authority, New York Electric System Revenue | 305,000 | 355,511 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 9/1/44 | 250,000 | 277,777 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 9/1/46 | 130,000 | 149,487 | ||||||
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia (Plant Vogtle Units 3&4 Project) | 400,000 | 440,468 | ||||||
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Gas Works Revenue | 500,000 | 586,000 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Revenue | 70,000 | 49,700 | ||||||
Series AAA 5.25% 7/1/25 ‡ | 40,000 | 28,500 | ||||||
Series CCC 5.25% 7/1/27 ‡ | 315,000 | 224,437 | ||||||
Series WW 5.00% 7/1/28 ‡ | 305,000 | 216,550 | ||||||
Series XX 4.75% 7/1/26 ‡ | 40,000 | 28,200 |
20
Table of Contents
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Electric Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Revenue | 120,000 | $ | 85,500 | |||||
Series XX 5.75% 7/1/36 ‡ | 150,000 | 107,625 | ||||||
Series ZZ 4.75% 7/1/27 ‡ | 35,000 | 24,675 | ||||||
Series ZZ 5.25% 7/1/24 ‡ | 55,000 | 39,187 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
3,008,636 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Healthcare Revenue Bonds – 32.76% |
| |||||||
Alabama Special Care Facilities Financing Authority-Birmingham Alabama | 500,000 | 512,090 | ||||||
Allegheny County Hospital, Pennsylvania Development Authority | 300,000 | 313,593 | ||||||
Arizona Industrial Development Authority Revenue | 190,000 | 161,418 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 1/1/49 | 70,000 | 60,035 | ||||||
Series B 5.125% 1/1/54 | 85,000 | 72,660 | ||||||
Berks County, Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority Revenue | 1,000,000 | 1,143,580 | ||||||
Brookhaven Development Authority Revenue, Georgia | 30,000 | 32,062 | ||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority Revenue | 400,000 | 628,744 | ||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority | 760,000 | 809,598 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Healthcare Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Capital Trust Agency, Florida | 375,000 | $ | 295,013 | |||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Revenue | 1,000,000 | 1,080,600 | ||||||
(Healthcare Facilities - American Baptist) 8.00% 8/1/43 | 330,000 | 350,397 | ||||||
(Sanford Health) Series A 5.00% 11/1/44 | 500,000 | 605,240 | ||||||
Cuyahoga County, Ohio Hospital Revenue | 1,000,000 | 1,065,030 | ||||||
Escambia County Health Facilities Authority Revenue | 540,000 | 567,146 | ||||||
Idaho Health Facilities Authority Revenue | 1,250,000 | 1,521,387 | ||||||
Kalispell, Montana | 700,000 | 682,976 | ||||||
Maine Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Revenue | 300,000 | 316,596 | ||||||
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority | 255,000 | 266,444 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County, Florida Health Facilities Authority Revenue | 200,000 | 234,988 |
(continues) | 21 |
Table of Contents
Schedules of investments
Delaware Investments® National Municipal Income Fund
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Healthcare Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Michigan Finance Authority Revenue | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,144,920 | |||||
Montgomery County Higher Education & Health Authority Revenue | 750,000 | 782,625 | ||||||
Moon, Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority | 750,000 | 753,413 | ||||||
New Hope, Texas Cultural Education Facilities | 135,000 | 128,050 | ||||||
Series B 4.75% 7/1/51 | 160,000 | 133,275 | ||||||
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority Revenue | 300,000 | 310,158 | ||||||
(Valley Health System Obligated) 4.00% 7/1/44 | 475,000 | 512,473 | ||||||
New York State Dormitory Authority | 305,000 | 328,799 | ||||||
(Orange Regional Medical Center) 144A 5.00% 12/1/35 # | 500,000 | 568,240 | ||||||
Orange County, Florida Health Facilities Authority Revenue | 400,000 | 403,800 | ||||||
5.00% 6/1/36 | 250,000 | 252,037 | ||||||
5.125% 6/1/42 | 750,000 | 755,213 | ||||||
Oregon State Facilities Authority Revenue | 500,000 | 568,640 | ||||||
Palm Beach County Health Facilities Authority, Florida | 20,000 | 21,046 | ||||||
Series A 7.50% 6/1/49 | 105,000 | 110,228 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Healthcare Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Palomar Health, California | 130,000 | $ | 149,158 | |||||
Tarrant County, Texas Cultural Education Facilities Finance | 250,000 | 263,820 | ||||||
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Revenue | 250,000 | 273,283 | ||||||
Westminster, Maryland | 500,000 | 520,040 | ||||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority | 1,000,000 | 837,940 | ||||||
Yavapai County, Arizona Industrial Development Authority Revenue | 720,000 | 802,260 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
20,339,015 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Lease Revenue Bonds – 7.72% |
| |||||||
California State Public Works Board Lease Revenue | 1,000,000 | 1,061,910 | ||||||
Idaho State Building Authority Revenue | 110,000 | 119,544 | ||||||
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority Illinois Revenue | 1,375,000 | 1,255,636 | ||||||
5.00% 6/15/50 | 290,000 | 285,917 | ||||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority | 1,000,000 | 1,072,610 |
22
Table of Contents
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Lease Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority | 500,000 | $ | 487,450 | |||||
Public Finance Authority, Wisconsin Airport Facilities Revenue | 500,000 | 508,505 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4,791,572 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Local General Obligation Bonds – 2.11% |
| |||||||
Chicago Board of Education, Illinois | 205,000 | 206,683 | ||||||
5.00% 4/1/46 | 210,000 | 210,409 | ||||||
Chicago, Illinois | ||||||||
Series A 5.50% 1/1/34 | 225,000 | 234,304 | ||||||
Series A 5.50% 1/1/49 | 150,000 | 155,859 | ||||||
Series C 5.00% 1/1/38 | 500,000 | 505,365 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,312,620 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Pre-Refunded/Escrowed to Maturity Bonds – 3.92% |
| |||||||
JEA Electric System Revenue, Florida | 645,000 | 730,121 | ||||||
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority Revenue | 105,000 | 111,216 | ||||||
Metropolitan Transportation Authority Revenue, New York | 190,000 | 202,145 | ||||||
(Unrefunded) Series A 5.00%11/15/41-21§ | 310,000 | 329,815 | ||||||
Monroe County, New York Industrial Development Revenue | 495,000 | 527,561 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Pre-Refunded/Escrowed to Maturity Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Monroe County, Pennsylvania Hospital Authority Revenue | 500,000 | $ | 532,475 | |||||
|
| |||||||
2,433,333 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Special Tax Revenue Bonds – 15.96% |
| |||||||
Allentown, Pennsylvania Neighborhood Improvement Zone Development Authority Revenue | 175,000 | 177,657 | ||||||
Guam Government Business Privilege Tax Revenue | 540,000 | 526,754 | ||||||
Kansas City, Missouri Redevelopment Authority Revenue | 135,000 | 138,241 | ||||||
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Senior | 200,000 | 264,286 | ||||||
Mosaic District, Virginia Community Development Authority Revenue | 520,000 | 532,412 | ||||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Revenue | 200,000 | 210,794 | ||||||
5.00% 6/15/29 | 800,000 | 842,392 | ||||||
New York State Dormitory Authority | 1,000,000 | 1,114,540 | ||||||
Northampton County, Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority Revenue | 205,000 | 219,600 |
(continues) | 23 |
Table of Contents
Schedules of investments
Delaware Investments® National Municipal Income Fund
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Special Tax Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Port Authority of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Special Revenue Transportation Refunding 5.75% 3/1/29 | 900,000 | $ | 934,911 | |||||
Public Finance Authority, Wisconsin Airport Facilities Revenue | 380,000 | 377,610 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Revenue | 3,475,000 | 3,280,956 | ||||||
Regional Transportation District, Colorado Tax Revenue | 500,000 | 503,060 | ||||||
Sales Tax Securitization, Illinois | 500,000 | 562,835 | ||||||
Wyandotte County, Kansas City, Kansas Unified Government Special Obligation Revenue | 220,000 | 223,150 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
9,909,198 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
State General Obligation Bonds – 11.56% |
| |||||||
California State | 320,000 | 326,416 | ||||||
(Various Purposes) | 270,000 | 369,703 | ||||||
5.00% 10/1/41 | 440,000 | 465,445 | ||||||
5.00% 11/1/47 | 1,000,000 | 1,197,030 | ||||||
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico | 1,325,000 | 798,313 | ||||||
District of Columbia | 500,000 | 610,525 | ||||||
Illinois State | 595,000 | 616,801 | ||||||
5.00% 5/1/36 | 90,000 | 91,001 | ||||||
5.00% 11/1/36 | 1,170,000 | 1,188,685 | ||||||
5.00% 2/1/39 | 160,000 | 161,038 | ||||||
Series A 5.00% 4/1/38 | 170,000 | 171,017 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
State General Obligation Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Illinois State | 1,300,000 | $ | 1,180,790 | |||||
|
| |||||||
7,176,764 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Transportation Revenue Bonds – 22.44% |
| |||||||
Alameda Corridor, California Transportation Authority (2nd Sub Lien) Series B 5.00% 10/1/37 | 430,000 | 477,145 | ||||||
Atlanta, Georgia Department of Aviation | 1,000,000 | 1,127,370 | ||||||
California Municipal Finance Authority Mobile Home Park Revenue | 615,000 | 652,066 | ||||||
Chicago, Illinois O’Hare International Airport Revenue | 1,000,000 | 1,074,450 | ||||||
Harris County, Texas Toll Road Authority Revenue | 500,000 | 557,435 | ||||||
Metropolitan Washington D.C. Airports Authority Dulles Toll Road Revenue | 510,000 | 518,068 | ||||||
New Jersey Turnpike Authority | 1,000,000 | 1,103,180 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 1/1/40 | 250,000 | 296,187 | ||||||
New Orleans, Louisiana Aviation Board | 1,000,000 | 1,111,990 | ||||||
New York Liberty Development Revenue | 500,000 | 524,530 |
24
Table of Contents
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Transportation Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
New York Transportation Development | 700,000 | $ | 720,384 | |||||
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Subordinate | 500,000 | 558,855 | ||||||
SeriesA-1 5.00% 12/1/47 | 210,000 | 250,958 | ||||||
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey Special Project | 500,000 | 500,470 | ||||||
Salt Lake City, Utah Airport Revenue | 625,000 | 717,675 | ||||||
South Jersey Port, New Jersey | 85,000 | 87,931 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 1/1/42 (AMT) | 85,000 | 88,829 | ||||||
Series B 5.00% 1/1/48 (AMT) | 195,000 | 201,961 | ||||||
St. Louis, Missouri Airport Revenue | 1,000,000 | 1,053,350 | ||||||
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corporate Senior Lien Revenue | 110,000 | 117,647 | ||||||
5.00% 12/31/45 (AMT) | 110,000 | 116,937 | ||||||
5.00% 12/31/50 (AMT) | 160,000 | 169,421 | ||||||
(LBJ Infrastructure) 7.50% 6/30/33 | 665,000 | 671,098 | ||||||
(NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 LLC Segment 3C Project) 5.00% 6/30/58 (AMT) | 500,000 | 536,295 | ||||||
(NTE Mobility Partners) 6.75% 6/30/43 (AMT) | 225,000 | 252,023 | ||||||
7.00% 12/31/38 (AMT) | 165,000 | 186,430 |
Principal Amount° | Value (US $) | |||||||
Municipal Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Transportation Revenue Bonds (continued) |
| |||||||
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority | 235,000 | $ | 256,430 | |||||
|
| |||||||
13,929,115 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds – 1.22% |
| |||||||
New York City, New York Water & Sewer System Revenue | 185,000 | 202,347 | ||||||
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Water & Wastewater Revenue | 500,000 | 552,780 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
755,127 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Municipal Bonds | 88,383,352 | |||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
Short-Term Investments – 2.25% |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Variable Rate Demand Notes – 2.25%¤ |
| |||||||
Mississippi Business Finance Corporation Gulf Opportunity Zone Industrial Development Revenue | 300,000 | 300,000 | ||||||
Series G 0.65% 11/1/35 | 700,000 | 700,000 | ||||||
Series K 0.65% 11/1/35 | 400,000 | 400,000 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Short-Term Investments | 1,400,000 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Value of Securities – 144.61% |
| $ | 89,783,352 | |||||
|
|
# | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.At March 31, 2020, the aggregate value of Rule 144A securities was $3,340,422, which represents 5.38% of the Fund’s net assets. See Note 7 in “Notes to financial statements.” |
¤ | Tax-exempt obligations that contain a floating or variable interest rate adjustment formula and an unconditional right of demand to receive payment of the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest upon a short notice period (generally up to 30 days) prior to specified dates either from the issuer or by drawing on a bank |
(continues) | 25 |
Table of Contents
Schedules of investments
Delaware Investments® National Municipal Income Fund
letter of credit, a guarantee, or insurance issued with respect to such instrument. Each rate shown is as of March 31, 2020. |
§ | Pre-refunded bonds. Municipal bonds that are generally backed or secured by US Treasury bonds. Forpre-refunded bonds, the stated maturity is followed by the year in which the bond will bepre-refunded. See Note 7 in “Notes to financial statements.” |
° | Principal amount shown is stated in USD unless noted that the security is denominated in another currency. |
‡ | Non-income producing security. Security is currently in default. |
● | Variable rate investment. Rates reset periodically. Rate shown reflects the rate in effect at March 31, 2020. For securities based on a published reference rate and spread, the reference rate and spread are indicated in their description above. The reference rate descriptions (i.e. LIBOR03M, LIBOR06M, etc.) used in this report are identical for different securities, but the underlying reference rates may differ due to the timing of the reset period. Certain variable rate securities are not based on a published reference rate and spread but are |
determined by the issuer or agent and are based on current market conditions, or for mortgage-backed securities, are impacted by the individual mortgages which are paying off over time. These securities do not indicate a reference rate and spread in their description above. |
Summary of abbreviations:
AGM – Insured by Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation
AMT – Subject to Alternative Minimum Tax
ICE – Intercontinental Exchange
LIBOR – London Interbank Offered Rate
LIBOR03M – ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month
LIBOR06M – ICE LIBOR USD 6 Month
USD – US Dollar
See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of the financial statements.
26
Table of Contents
Statements of assets and liabilities
Delaware Funds® by MacquarieClosed-End Municipal Bond Funds
March 31, 2020
Delaware Investments® Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc. | Delaware Investments Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc. | Delaware Investments National Municipal Income Fund | ||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||
Investments, at value1 | $ | 96,769,831 | $ | 235,605,960 | $ | 89,783,352 | ||||||
Cash | 1,199,199 | 829,226 | 2,252,913 | |||||||||
Interest income receivable | 1,290,933 | 3,067,825 | 1,157,480 | |||||||||
Offering cost for preferred shareholders | 193,868 | 193,868 | 193,868 | |||||||||
Prepaid rating agency fee | 14,310 | 14,310 | 14,310 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total assets | 99,468,141 | 239,711,189 | 93,401,923 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Liquidation value of preferred stock | 30,000,000 | 75,000,000 | 30,000,000 | |||||||||
Payable for securities purchased | 100,180 | — | 1,250,918 | |||||||||
Other accrued expenses | 43,988 | 31,361 | 28,671 | |||||||||
Investment management fees payable | 33,994 | 81,745 | 31,748 | |||||||||
Audit and tax fees payable | 3,500 | 3,500 | 3,500 | |||||||||
Legal fees payable to affiliates | 1,354 | 3,147 | 1,254 | |||||||||
Accounting and administration expenses payable to affiliates | 638 | 1,058 | 618 | |||||||||
Directors’/Trustees’ fees and expenses payable | 509 | 1,184 | 471 | |||||||||
Reports and statements to shareholders expenses payable to affiliates | 91 | 216 | 82 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total liabilities | 30,184,254 | 75,122,211 | 31,317,262 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders | $ | 69,283,887 | $ | 164,588,978 | $ | 62,084,661 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders Consist of: | ||||||||||||
Paid-in capital ($0.001 par value)2,3 | $ | 66,918,121 | $ | 157,931,075 | $ | 60,209,588 | ||||||
Total distributable earnings (loss) | 2,365,766 | 6,657,903 | 1,875,073 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders | $ | 69,283,887 | $ | 164,588,978 | $ | 62,084,661 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Asset Value per Common Share | $ | 14.32 | $ | 14.31 | $ | 13.71 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
1Investments, at cost | 94,410,234 | 229,760,590 | 88,461,725 | |||||||||
2Common shares outstanding | 4,837,100 | 11,504,975 | 4,528,443 | |||||||||
3Common shares authorized | 200 million | 200 million | unlimited |
See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of the financial statements.
27 |
Table of Contents
Delaware Funds® by MacquarieClosed-End Municipal Bond Funds
Year ended March 31, 2020
Delaware Investments® Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc. | Delaware Investments Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc. | Delaware Investments National Municipal Income Fund | ||||||||||
Investment Income: | ||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 4,144,293 | $ | 8,673,687 | $ | 3,983,395 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||
Management fees | 412,791 | 982,054 | 387,623 | |||||||||
Interest expense | 763,298 | 1,845,446 | 772,655 | |||||||||
Dividend disbursing and transfer agent fees and expenses | 59,480 | 99,007 | 62,138 | |||||||||
Accounting and administration expenses | 57,292 | 81,283 | 56,228 | |||||||||
Offering costs | 57,210 | 62,152 | 62,600 | |||||||||
Rating agency fees | 51,994 | 54,441 | 34,808 | |||||||||
Legal fees | 44,998 | 96,050 | 43,827 | |||||||||
Audit and tax fees | 41,477 | 42,022 | 41,477 | |||||||||
Reports and statements to shareholders | 21,725 | 38,255 | 22,578 | |||||||||
Stock exchange fees | 4,748 | 10,951 | 4,302 | |||||||||
Directors’/Trustees’ fees and expenses | 4,189 | 9,736 | 3,833 | |||||||||
Custodian fees | 2,899 | 4,831 | 2,447 | |||||||||
Registration fees | — | 90 | 180 | |||||||||
Other | 17,911 | 31,781 | 24,995 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
1,540,012 | 3,358,099 | 1,519,691 | ||||||||||
Less expense paid indirectly | (1,484 | ) | (3,036 | ) | (2,013 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,538,528 | 3,355,063 | 1,517,678 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Investment Income | 2,605,765 | 5,318,624 | 2,465,717 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain: | ||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments | 945,232 | 376,557 | 948,488 | |||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | (2,879,898 | ) | (2,105,990 | ) | (3,576,788 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Loss | (1,934,666 | ) | (1,729,433 | ) | (2,628,300 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | 671,099 | $ | 3,589,191 | $ | (162,583 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of the financial statements.
28
Table of Contents
Statements of changes in net assets
Delaware Funds® by MacquarieClosed-End Municipal Bond Funds
Delaware Investments® Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc. | ||||||||
Year ended | ||||||||
3/31/20 | 3/31/19 | |||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Operations: | ||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 2,605,765 | $ | 2,823,671 | ||||
Net realized gain | 945,232 | 50,415 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | (2,879,898 | ) | 150,252 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | 671,099 | 3,024,338 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Dividends and Distributions to Common Shareholders from: | ||||||||
Distributable earnings | (3,438,465 | ) | (3,023,188 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
(3,438,465 | ) | (3,023,188 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders | (2,767,366 | ) | 1,150 | |||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: | ||||||||
Beginning of year | 72,051,253 | 72,050,103 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
End of year | $ | 69,283,887 | $ | 72,051,253 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Delaware Investments Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc. | ||||||||
Year ended | ||||||||
3/31/20 | 3/31/19 | |||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Operations: | ||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 5,318,624 | $ | 5,535,037 | ||||
Net realized gain | 376,557 | 61,162 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | (2,105,990 | ) | 1,928,102 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | 3,589,191 | 7,524,301 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Dividends and Distributions to Common Shareholders from: | ||||||||
Distributable earnings | (5,540,135 | ) | (5,177,239 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
(5,540,135 | ) | (5,177,239 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders | (1,950,944 | ) | 2,347,062 | |||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: | ||||||||
Beginning of year | 166,539,922 | 164,192,860 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
End of year | $ | 164,588,978 | $ | 166,539,922 | ||||
|
|
|
|
29 |
Table of Contents
Statements of changes in net assets
Delaware Funds® by MacquarieClosed-End Municipal Bond Funds
Delaware Investments® National Municipal Income Fund | ||||||||
Year ended | ||||||||
3/31/20 | 3/31/19 | |||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Operations: | ||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 2,465,717 | $ | 2,687,792 | ||||
Net realized gain | 948,488 | 274,447 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | (3,576,788 | ) | 230,113 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | (162,583 | ) | 3,192,352 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Dividends and Distributions to Common Shareholders from: | ||||||||
Distributable earnings | (3,151,586 | ) | (2,717,066 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
(3,151,586 | ) | (2,717,066 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders | (3,314,169 | ) | 475,286 | |||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: | ||||||||
Beginning of year | 65,398,830 | 64,923,544 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
End of year | $ | 62,084,661 | $ | 65,398,830 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of the financial statements.
30
Table of Contents
Delaware Funds® by MacquarieClosed-End Municipal Bond Funds
Year ended March 31, 2020
Delaware Investments® Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc. | Delaware Investments Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc. | Delaware Investments National Municipal Income Fund | ||||||||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used for) Operating Activities: | ||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ | 671,099 | $ | 3,589,191 | $ | (162,583 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to cash provided by (used for) operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on investments | 534,508 | 2,241,882 | 474,351 | |||||||||
Purchase of investment securities | (32,170,760 | ) | (33,907,472 | ) | (31,974,098 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from disposition of investment securities | 33,255,119 | 33,700,658 | 36,567,732 | |||||||||
(Purchase) proceeds from disposition of short-term investment securities, net | 600,000 | 300,000 | (1,050,000 | ) | ||||||||
Net realized gain on investments | (945,232 | ) | (376,557 | ) | (948,488 | ) | ||||||
Net change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 2,879,898 | 2,105,990 | 3,576,788 | |||||||||
Increase in receivable for securities sold | – | — | 531,511 | |||||||||
Decrease in interest receivable | 134,079 | 79,509 | 147,560 | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in other accrued expenses receivable | 13,940 | 6,940 | (3,060 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in offering costs for preferred shareholders | (133,356 | ) | (118,967 | ) | (128,151 | ) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in payable for securities purchased | 100,180 | (1,668,648 | ) | (1,505,158 | ) | |||||||
Decrease in interest payable | (2,211 | ) | (5,527 | ) | (2,211 | ) | ||||||
Decrease in investment management fees payable | (499 | ) | 226 | (420 | ) | |||||||
Decrease in Directors’/Trustees’ fees and expenses payable | (53 | ) | (110 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||||
Decrease in audit fees payable | (1,223 | ) | (1,223 | ) | (1,223 | ) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in other affiliates payable | (3,952 | ) | (3,792 | ) | (3,932 | ) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in other accrued expenses | 20,134 | (5,992 | ) | 3,273 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Adjustments | 4,280,572 | 2,346,917 | 5,684,438 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 4,951,671 | 5,936,108 | 5,521,855 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Cash Flows Used for Financing Activities: | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends and distributions paid to common shareholders and preferred shareholders | (3,438,465 | ) | (5,540,135 | ) | (3,151,586 | ) | ||||||
Decrease in bank overdraft | (314,541 | ) | — | (118,768 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net cash used for financing activities | (3,753,006 | ) | (5,540,135 | ) | (3,270,354 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net increase in cash | 1,198,665 | 395,973 | 2,251,501 | |||||||||
Cash at beginning of year | — | 435,975 | — | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Cash at end of year | $ | 1,198,665 | $ | 831,948 | $ | 2,251,501 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Cash paid for interest expense for leverage | $ | 765,509 | $ | 1,850,973 | $ | 774,866 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of the financial statements.
31 |
Table of Contents
Delaware Investments® Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
Selected data for each share of the Fund outstanding throughout each period were as follows:
Year ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
3/31/20 | 3/31/19 | 3/31/18 | 3/31/17 | 3/31/16 | ||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ | 14.90 | $ | 14.90 | $ | 14.93 | $ | 15.66 | $ | 15.55 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income1 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.71 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (0.40 | ) | 0.04 | 0.03 | (0.68 | ) | 0.12 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.14 | 0.62 | 0.66 | (0.01 | ) | 0.83 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Less dividends and distributions to common | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | (0.57 | ) | (0.62 | ) | (0.69 | ) | (0.72 | ) | (0.72 | ) | ||||||||||
Net realized gain | (0.15 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total dividends and distributions | (0.72 | ) | (0.62 | ) | (0.69 | ) | (0.72 | ) | (0.72 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $ | 14.32 | $ | 14.90 | $ | 14.90 | $ | 14.93 | $ | 15.66 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Market value, end of period | $ | 13.27 | $ | 14.17 | $ | 14.39 | $ | 14.70 | $ | 15.07 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total investment return based on:2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Market value | (1.99% | ) | 2.90% | 2.44% | 2.24% | 10.38% | ||||||||||||||
Net asset value | 0.58% | 4.50% | 4.44% | (0.07% | ) | 5.85% | ||||||||||||||
Ratios and supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period (000 omitted) | $ | 69,284 | $ | 72,051 | $ | 72,050 | $ | 72,240 | $ | 75,771 | ||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets applicable to common shareholders3 | 2.10% | 2.14% | 1.82% | 1.60% | 1.52% | |||||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets applicable to common shareholders4 | 3.56% | 3.98% | 4.14% | 4.32% | 4.59% | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 31% | 7% | 11% | 12% | 13% | |||||||||||||||
Leverage analysis: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Value of preferred shares outstanding (000 omitted)5 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,000 | ||||||||||
Net asset coverage per share of preferred shares, end of period5 | $ | 330,946 | $ | 340,171 | $ | 340,167 | $ | 340,799 | $ | 352,571 | ||||||||||
Liquidation value per share of preferred shares5 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 |
1 | Net investment income is reduced by dividends paid to preferred shareholders from net investment income of $0.157, $0.168, $0.135, $0.110, and $0.079 per share for the years ended March 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. |
2 | Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common stock on the opening of the first day and a sale on the closing of the last day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions, if any, are assumed for the purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan. Generally, total investment return based on net asset value will be higher than total investment return based on market value in periods where there is an increase in the discount or a decrease in the premium of the market value to the net asset value from the beginning to the end of such periods. Conversely, total investment return based on net asset value will be lower than total investment return based on market value in periods where there is a decrease in the discount or an increase in the premium of the market value to the net asset value from the beginning to the end of such periods. |
3 | The ratio of expenses to average net assets applicable to common shareholders excluding interest expense for the years ended March 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were 1.06%, 1.00%, 0.93%, 0.90%, and 1.01%, respectively. |
4 | The ratio of net investment income excluding interest expense to average net assets for the years ended March 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were 4.60%, 5.12%, 5.03%, 5.03%, and 5.11%, respectively. |
5 | In November 2011, the Fund issued a series of 300 variable rate preferred shares, with a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share (Series 2016 Shares). The Series 2016 Shares were redeemed on Feb. 2, 2016 and replaced with Series 2021 Shares, which were the same amount and value as the Fund’s Series 2016 Shares. On April 25, 2019, the Fund redeemed the Series 2021 Shares, and replaced them with Series 2049 Muni-MultiMode Preferred Shares (Series 2049), which have the same amount and value as the Series 2021 Shares. |
See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of the financial statements.
32
Table of Contents
Financial highlights
Delaware Investments® Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc.
Selected data for each share of the Fund outstanding throughout each period were as follows:
Year ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
3/31/20 | 3/31/19 | 3/31/18 | 3/31/17 | 3/31/16 | ||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ | 14.48 | $ | 14.27 | $ | 14.41 | $ | 15.05 | $ | 14.97 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income1 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.63 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (0.15 | ) | 0.18 | (0.12 | ) | (0.59 | ) | 0.08 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.31 | 0.66 | 0.39 | (0.04 | ) | 0.71 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Less dividends and distributions to common | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | (0.45 | ) | (0.45 | ) | (0.53 | ) | (0.60 | ) | (0.63 | ) | ||||||||||
Net realized gain | (0.03 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total dividends and distributions | (0.48 | ) | (0.45 | ) | (0.53 | ) | (0.60 | ) | (0.63 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $ | 14.31 | $ | 14.48 | $ | 14.27 | $ | 14.41 | $ | 15.05 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Market value, end of period | $ | 12.37 | $ | 12.63 | $ | 12.63 | $ | 14.56 | $ | 14.70 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total investment return based on:2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Market value | 1.53% | 3.73% | (9.94% | ) | 3.16% | 11.17% | ||||||||||||||
Net asset value | 2.45% | 5.26% | 2.82% | (0.27% | ) | 5.30% | ||||||||||||||
Ratios and supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period (000 omitted) | $ | 164,589 | $ | 166,540 | $ | 164,193 | $ | 165,754 | $ | 173,119 | ||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets applicable to common shareholders3 | 1.97% | 2.10% | 1.78% | 1.59% | 1.46% | |||||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets applicable to common shareholders4 | 3.12% | 3.40% | 3.48% | 3.69% | 4.24% | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 14% | 13% | 22% | 9% | 16% | |||||||||||||||
Leverage analysis: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Value of preferred shares outstanding (000 omitted)5 | $ | 75,000 | $ | 75,000 | $ | 75,000 | $ | 75,000 | $ | 75,000 | ||||||||||
Net asset coverage per share of preferred shares, end of period5 | $ | 319,452 | $ | 322,053 | $ | 318,924 | $ | 321,006 | $ | 330,825 | ||||||||||
Liquidation value per share of preferred shares5 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 |
1 | Net investment income is reduced by dividends paid to preferred shareholders from net investment income of $0.160, $0.176, $0.142, $0.115, and $0.083 per share for the years ended March 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. |
2 | Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common stock on the opening of the first day and a sale on the closing of the last day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions, if any, are assumed for the purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan. Generally, total investment return based on net asset value will be higher than total investment return based on market value in periods where there is an increase in the discount or a decrease in the premium of the market value to the net asset value from the beginning to the end of such periods. Conversely, total investment return based on net asset value will be lower than total investment return based on market value in periods where there is a decrease in the discount or an increase in the premium of the market value to the net asset value from the beginning to the end of such periods. |
3 | The ratio of expenses to average net assets applicable to common shareholders excluding interest expense for the years ended March 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were 0.89%, 0.85%, 0.81%, 0.82%, and 0.90%, respectively. |
4 | The ratio of net investment income excluding interest expense to average net assets for the years ended March 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were 4.20%, 4.65%, 4.45%, 4.46%, and 4.80%, respectively. |
5 | In November 2011, the Fund issued a series of 750 variable rate preferred shares, with a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share (Series 2016 Shares).The Series 2016 Shares were redeemed on Feb. 2, 2016 and replaced with Series 2021 Shares, which were the same amount and value as the Fund’s Series 2016 Shares. On April 25, 2019, the Fund redeemed the Series 2021 Shares, and replaced them with Series 2049 Muni-MultiMode Preferred Shares (Series 2049), which have the same amount and value as the Series 2021 Shares. |
See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of the financial statements.
(continues) | 33 |
Table of Contents
Financial highlights
Delaware Investments® National Municipal Income Fund
Selected data for each share of the Fund outstanding throughout each period were as follows:
Year ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
3/31/20 | 3/31/19 | 3/31/18 | 3/31/17 | 3/31/16 | ||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ | 14.44 | $ | 14.34 | $ | 14.31 | $ | 15.02 | $ | 14.97 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income1 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.70 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (0.57 | ) | 0.11 | (0.01 | ) | (0.69 | ) | 0.11 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total from investment operations | (0.03 | ) | 0.70 | 0.63 | (0.03 | ) | 0.81 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Less dividends and distributions to common | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | (0.55 | ) | (0.60 | ) | (0.60 | ) | (0.68 | ) | (0.76 | ) | ||||||||||
Net realized gain | (0.15 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total dividends and distributions | (0.70 | ) | (0.60 | ) | (0.60 | ) | (0.68 | ) | (0.76 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $ | 13.71 | $ | 14.44 | $ | 14.34 | $ | 14.31 | $ | 15.02 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Market value, end of period | $ | 12.24 | $ | 12.69 | $ | 12.62 | $ | 12.94 | $ | 13.80 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total investment return based on:2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Market value | 1.35% | 5.56% | 2.04% | (1.50% | ) | 11.32% | ||||||||||||||
Net asset value | (0.24% | ) | 5.71% | 4.84% | 0.01% | 6.35% | ||||||||||||||
Ratios and supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period (000 omitted) | $ | 62,085 | $ | 65,399 | $ | 64,924 | $ | 64,792 | $ | 68,008 | ||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets applicable to common shareholders3 | 2.27% | 2.31% | 1.97% | 1.73% | 1.70% | |||||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets applicable to common shareholders4 | 3.69% | 4.19% | 4.36% | 4.45% | 4.72% | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 33% | 16% | 50% | 13% | 25% | |||||||||||||||
Leverage analysis: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Value of preferred shares outstanding (000 omitted)5 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,000 | ||||||||||
Net asset coverage per share of preferred shares, end of period5 | $ | 306,949 | $ | 317,996 | $ | 316,412 | $ | 315,898 | $ | 326,693 | ||||||||||
Liquidation value per share of preferred shares5 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 |
1 | Net investment income is reduced by dividends paid to preferred shareholders from net investment income of $0.171, $0.179, $0.144, $0.117, and $0.084 per share for the years ended March 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. |
2 | Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common stock on the opening of the first day and a sale on the closing of the last day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions, if any, are assumed for the purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan. Generally, total investment return based on net asset value will be higher than total investment return based on market value in periods where there is an increase in the discount or a decrease in the premium of the market value to the net asset value from the beginning to the end of such periods. Conversely, total investment return based on net asset value will be lower than total investment return based on market value in periods where there is a decrease in the discount or an increase in the premium of the market value to the net asset value from the beginning to the end of such periods. |
3 | The ratio of expenses to average net assets applicable to common shareholders excluding interest expense for the years ended March 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were 1.11%, 1.05%, 0.98%, 0.94%, and 1.13%, respectively. |
4 | The ratio of net investment income excluding interest expense to average net assets for the years ended March 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were 4.84%, 5.45%, 5.35%, 5.24%, and 5.29%, respectively. |
5 | In March 2012, the Fund issued a series of 300 variable rate preferred shares, with a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share (Series 2017 Shares). The Series 2017 Shares were redeemed on Feb. 2, 2016 and replaced with Series 2021 Shares, which were the same amount and value as the Fund’s Series 2017 Shares. On April 25, 2019, the Fund redeemed the Series 2021 Shares, and replaced them with Series 2049 Muni-MultiMode Preferred Shares (Series 2049), which have the same amount and value as the Series 2021 Shares. |
See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of the financial statements.
34
Table of Contents
Delaware Funds® by MacquarieClosed-End Municipal Bond Funds
March 31, 2020
Delaware Investments® Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (Colorado Municipal Fund) and Delaware Investments Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc. (Minnesota Municipal Fund II) are organized as Minnesota corporations and Delaware Investments National Municipal Income Fund (National Municipal Fund) is organized as a Massachusetts business trust (each referred to as a Fund and collectively as the Funds). Colorado Municipal Fund, Minnesota Municipal Fund II, and National Municipal Fund are considered diversifiedclosed-end management investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The Funds’ shares trade on the NYSE American, the successor to the American Stock Exchange, formerly known as NYSE Market.
The investment objective of Colorado Municipal Fund is to provide current income exempt from federal income tax and from Colorado state income tax, if any, consistent with the preservation of capital. The investment objective of Minnesota Municipal Fund II is to provide current income exempt from federal income tax and from Minnesota state personal income tax, if any, consistent with the preservation of capital. The investment objective of National Municipal Fund is to provide current income exempt from federal income tax, consistent with the preservation of capital. Each of Colorado Municipal Fund and Minnesota Municipal Fund II seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing substantially all of its net assets in investment grade,tax-exempt municipal obligations of its respective state at the time of investment. National Municipal Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets in securities the income from which is exempt from federal income tax.
1. Significant Accounting Policies
Each Fund follows accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services - Investment Companies. The following accounting policies are in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP) and are consistently followed by the Funds.
Security Valuation— Debt securities are valued based upon valuations provided by an independent pricing service or broker and reviewed by management. To the extent current market prices are not available, the pricing service may take into account developments related to the specific security, as well as transactions in comparable securities. Valuations for fixed income securities utilize matrix systems, which reflect such factors as security prices, yields, maturities, and ratings, and are supplemented by dealer and exchange quotations. Generally, other securities and assets for which market quotations are not readily available are valued at fair value as determined in good faith under the direction of each Fund’s Board of Directors/Trustees (each a Board, or collectively, the Boards). In determining whether market quotations are readily available or fair valuation will be used, various factors will be taken into consideration, such as market closures or suspension of trading in a security. Restricted securities are valued at fair value using methods approved by the Boards.
Federal Income Taxes— No provision for federal income taxes has been made as each Fund intends to continue to qualify for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and make the requisite distributions to shareholders. The Funds evaluate tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing each Fund’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are“more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the“more-likely-than-not” threshold are recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Management has analyzed each Fund’s tax positions taken or expected to be taken on each Fund’s federal income tax returns through the year ended March 31, 2020 and for all open tax years (years ended March 31, 2017–March 31, 2019), and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in each Fund’s financial statements. If applicable, each Fund recognizes interest accrued on unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in “Other” on the “Statements of operations.” During the year ended March 31, 2020, the Funds did not incur any interest or tax penalties.
Cash and Cash Equivalents— Cash and cash equivalents include deposits held at financial institutions, which are available for each Fund’s use with no restrictions, with original maturities of 90 days or less.
Use of Estimates— The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the fair value of investments, the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and the differences could be material.
Other— Expenses directly attributable to each Fund are charged directly to the Fund. Other expenses common to various funds within the Delaware Funds® by Macquarie (Delaware Funds) are generally allocated among such funds on the basis of average net assets. Management fees and certain other expenses are paid monthly. Security transactions are recorded on the date the securities are purchased or sold (trade date) for financial reporting purposes. Costs used in calculating realized gains and losses on the sale of investment securities are those of the
(continues) | 35 |
Table of Contents
Notes to financial statements
Delaware Funds® by Macquarie Closed-End Municipal Bond Funds
1. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
specific securities sold. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Discounts and premiums on debt securities are accreted or amortized to interest income, respectively, over the lives of the respective securities using the effective interest method. Each Fund declares and pays dividends from net investment income monthly and distributions from net realized gain on investments, if any, annually. Each Fund may distribute more frequently, if necessary for tax purposes. Dividends and distributions, if any, are recorded on theex-dividend date.
Each Fund receives earnings credits from its custodian when positive cash balances are maintained, which may be used to offset custody fees. The expenses paid under this arrangement are included on the “Statements of operations” under “Custodian fees” with the corresponding expenses offset included under “Less expenses paid indirectly.” For the year ended March 31, 2020, each Fund earned the following amounts under this arrangement:
Colorado Municipal Fund | Minnesota Municipal Fund II | National Municipal Fund | |||||||||||||
$ | 1,484 | $ | 3,036 | $ | 2,013 |
2. Investment Management, Administration Agreements and Other Transactions with Affiliates
In accordance with the terms of its respective investment management agreement, each Fund pays Delaware Management Company (DMC), a series of Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust and the investment manager, an annual fee of 0.40% which is calculated based on each Fund’s adjusted average daily net assets.
Delaware Investments Fund Services Company (DIFSC), an affiliate of DMC, provides fund accounting and financial administration oversight services to each Fund. For these services, DIFSC’s fees are calculated daily and paid monthly based on the aggregate daily net assets of all funds within the Delaware Funds at the following annual rates: 0.00475% of the first $35 billion; 0.0040% of the next $10 billion; and 0.0025% of aggregate average daily net assets in excess of $45 billion (Total Fee). Each fund in the Delaware Funds pays a minimum of $4,000, which, in aggregate, is subtracted from the Total Fee. Each fund then pays its portion of the remainder of the Total Fee on a relative net asset value (NAV) basis. These amounts are included on the “Statements of operations” under “Accounting and administration expenses.” For the year ended March 31, 2020, the Funds were charged for these services as follows:
Colorado Municipal Fund | Minnesota Municipal Fund II | National Municipal Fund | |||||||||||||
$ | 7,690 | $ | 12,766 | $ | 7,465 |
As provided in the investment management agreement, each Fund bears a portion of the cost of certain resources shared with DMC, including the cost of internal personnel of DMC and/or its affiliates that provide legal, tax, and regulatory reporting services to each Fund. These amounts are included on the “Statements of operations” under “Legal fees.” For the year ended March 31, 2020, each Fund was charged for internal legal, tax, and regulatory reporting services provided by DMC and/or its affiliates’ employees as follows:
Colorado Municipal Fund | Minnesota Municipal Fund II | National Municipal Fund | |||||||||||||
$ | 25,491 | $ | 48,253 | $ | 24,124 |
Directors’/Trustees’ fees include expenses accrued by each Fund for each Director’s/Trustee’s retainer and meeting fees. Certain officers of DMC and DIFSC are officers and/or Directors/Trustees of the Funds. These officers and Directors/Trustees are paid no compensation by the Funds.
Cross trades for the year ended March 31, 2020, were executed by the Funds pursuant to procedures adopted by the Boards designed to ensure compliance with Rule 17a-7 under the 1940 Act. Cross trading is the buying or selling of portfolio securities between funds of investment companies, or between a fund of an investment company and another entity, that are or could be considered affiliates by virtue of having a common investment advisor (or affiliated investment advisors), common directors/trustees and/or common officers. At their regularly scheduled meetings, the Boards review such transactions for compliance with the procedures adopted by the Boards.
36 |
Table of Contents
Pursuant to these procedures, for the year ended March 31, 2020, the Funds engaged in Rule 17a-7 securities purchases and securities sales, which resulted in realized gains or losses as follows:
Colorado Municipal Fund | Minnesota Municipal Fund II | National Municipal Fund | |||||||||||||
Purchases | $ | 2,240,122 | $ | 4,342,764 | $ | 824,184 | |||||||||
Sales | 1,946,820 | 6,644,588 | 2,519,370 | ||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) | (220,526 | ) | (223,857 | ) | 8,208 |
3. Investments
For the year ended March 31, 2020, each Fund made purchases and sales of investment securities other than short-term investments as follows:
Colorado Municipal Fund | Minnesota Municipal Fund II | National Municipal Fund | |||||||||||||
Purchases | $ | 32,170,761 | $ | 33,907,472 | $ | 31,974,099 | |||||||||
Sales | 33,255,120 | 33,700,658 | 36,567,733 |
The tax cost of investments includes adjustments to net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) which may not necessarily be final tax cost basis adjustments, but approximate the tax basis unrealized gains and losses that may be realized and distributed to shareholders. At March 31, 2020, the cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments for federal income tax purposes for each Fund were as follows:
Colorado Municipal Fund | Minnesota Municipal Fund II | National Municipal Fund | |||||||||||||
Cost of investments | $ | 94,547,962 | $ | 229,747,391 | $ | 88,477,892 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Aggregate unrealized appreciation of investments | $ | 3,977,255 | $ | 8,661,289 | $ | 3,495,424 | |||||||||
Aggregate unrealized depreciation of investments | (1,755,386 | ) | (2,802,720 | ) | (2,189,964 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | $ | 2,221,869 | $ | 5,858,569 | $ | 1,305,460 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
US GAAP defines fair value as the price that each Fund would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. A three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements has been established based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability. Inputs may be observable or unobservable and refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available under the circumstances. Each Fund’s investment in its entirety is assigned a level based upon the observability of the inputs which are significant to the overall valuation. The three-level hierarchy of inputs is summarized below.
Level 1 – | Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical investments. (Examples: equity securities,open-end investment companies, futures contracts, and exchange-traded options contracts) |
Level 2 – | Other observable inputs, including, but not limited to: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks, and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs. (Examples: debt securities, government securities, swap contracts, foreign currency exchange contracts, foreign securities utilizing international fair value pricing, broker-quoted securities, and fair valued securities) |
Level 3 – | Significant unobservable inputs, including each Fund’s own assumptions used to determine the fair value of investments. (Examples: broker-quoted securities and fair valued securities) |
(continues) | 37 |
Table of Contents
Notes to financial statements
Delaware Funds® by Macquarie Closed-End Municipal Bond Funds
3. Investments (continued)
Level 3 investments are valued using significant unobservable inputs. Each Fund may also use an income-based valuation approach in which the anticipated future cash flows of the investment are discounted to calculate fair value. Discounts may also be applied due to the nature or duration of any restrictions on the disposition of the investments. Valuations may also be based upon current market prices of securities that are comparable in coupon, rating, maturity, and industry. The derived value of a Level 3 investment may not represent the value which is received upon disposition and this could impact the results of operations.
The following tables summarize the valuation of each Fund’s investments by fair value hierarchy levels as of March 31, 2020:
Colorado Municipal Fund | |||||
Securities | Level 2 | ||||
Assets: | |||||
Municipal Bonds | $96,669,831 | ||||
Short-Term Investments | 100,000 | ||||
Total Value of Securities | $96,769,831 | ||||
Minnesota | |||||
Securities | Level 2 | ||||
Assets: | |||||
Municipal Bonds | $235,405,960 | ||||
Short-Term Investments | 200,000 | ||||
Total Value of Securities | $235,605,960 | ||||
National Municipal Fund | |||||
Securities | Level 2 | ||||
Assets: | |||||
Municipal Bonds | $88,383,352 | ||||
Short-Term Investments | 1,400,000 | ||||
Total Value of Securities | $89,783,352 |
During the year ended March 31, 2020, there were no transfers between Level 1 investments, Level 2 investments, or Level 3 investments. The Funds’ policy is to recognize transfers between levels based on fair value at the beginning of the reporting period.
38 |
Table of Contents
4. Dividend and Distribution Information
Income and long-term capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from US GAAP. Additionally, distributions from net short-term gains on sales of investment securities are treated as ordinary income for federal income tax purposes. The tax character of dividends and distributions paid during the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 was as follows:
Year ended March 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||
Colorado Municipal Fund | Minnesota Municipal Fund II | National Municipal Fund | ||||||||||
Ordinary income | $ — | $ 1,639 | $ 216,206 | |||||||||
Tax-exempt income | 3,511,439 | 7,042,947 | 3,273,266 | |||||||||
Long-term capital gains | 690,324 | 340,995 | 434,769 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total* | $4,201,763 | $7,385,581 | $3,924,241 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||
Colorado Municipal Fund | Minnesota Municipal Fund II | National Municipal Fund | ||||||||||
Ordinary income | $ | — | $ | 713 | $ | 12,101 | ||||||
Tax-exempt income | 3,835,350 | 7,206,931 | 3,517,127 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total* | $ | 3,835,350 | $ | 7,207,644 | $ | 3,529,228 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Distributions to preferred shareholders in this table are part of interest expense and therefore not shown as distributions on the statements of changes in net assets.
5. Components of Net Assets on a Tax Basis
As of March 31, 2020, the components of net assets on a tax basis were as follows:
Colorado Municipal Fund | Minnesota Municipal Fund II | National Municipal Fund | ||||||||||
Shares of beneficial interest | $ | 66,918,121 | $ | 157,931,075 | $ | 60,209,588 | ||||||
Undistributedtax-exempt income | — | 799,334 | 243,566 | |||||||||
Undistributed long-term capital gains | 346,810 | — | 326,047 | |||||||||
Qualified late year loss deferrals | (202,913 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on investments | 2,221,869 | 5,858,569 | 1,305,460 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net assets | $ | 69,283,887 | $ | 164,588,978 | $ | 62,084,661 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The differences between book basis and tax basis components of net assets are primarily attributable to tax treatment of market discount and premium on debt instruments and tax deferral of wash sales.
Qualified late year losses represent ordinary losses realized from Jan. 1, 2020 through March 31, 2020 and capital losses realized from Nov. 1, 2019 through March 31, 2020, that in accordance with federal income tax regulations, the Fund has elected to defer and treat as having arisen in the following fiscal year.
For federal income tax purposes, capital loss carryforwards may be carried forward and applied against future capital gains. In 2020, the Funds utilized capital loss carryforwards as follows:
Colorado Municipal Fund | Minnesota Municipal Fund II | National Municipal Fund | ||
$263,843 | $42,238 | $— |
(continues) | 39 |
Table of Contents
Notes to financial statements
Delaware Funds® by Macquarie Closed-End Municipal Bond Funds
6. Capital Stock
Pursuant to their articles of incorporation, Colorado Municipal Fund and Minnesota Municipal Fund II each have 200 million shares of $0.01 par value common shares authorized. National Municipal Fund has been authorized to issue an unlimited amount of $0.01 par value common shares. Shares issuable under each Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan are purchased by each Fund’s transfer agent, Computershare, Inc., in the open market. During the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the Funds did not issue any shares under their dividend reinvestment plan.
On April 25, 2019, Colorado Municipal Fund, Minnesota Municipal Fund II, and National Municipal Fund (each, a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”) priced private offerings to a qualified institutional buyer, as defined pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, of approximately $135 million of Muni-MultiMode Preferred Shares, Series 2049 (MMP). Colorado Municipal Fund, Minnesota Municipal Fund II, and National Municipal Fund issued $30,000,000, $75,000,000 and $30,000,000, respectively, of MMP Shares with a $100,000 liquidation value per share. Each Fund used the net proceeds from each offering to redeem its outstanding Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, Series 2021 (VMTP). The MMP shares were the same amount and value as the respective Fund’s VMTP shares.
The MMP shares are a floating rate form of preferred stock with a mandatory term redemption. The mandatory term redemption date for these three offerings is April 1, 2049. MMP shares have the option at either the request of the purchaser or issuer to be converted to a variable rate demand preferred (“VRDP”) structure. The converted VRDP shares could then be offered for sale to certain institutional investors. The VRDP could continue to remain outstanding for the remainder of the MMP shares’30-year term. MMP dividends are set weekly at a spread to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association Municipal Swap Index. MMP shares represent the preferred stock of each Fund and are senior, with priority in all respects, to each Fund’s common shares as to payments of dividends. MMP shares are redeemable at par. A Fund may be obligated to redeem certain of the MMP shares if the Fund fails to maintain certain asset coverage and leverage ratio requirements and such failures are not cured by the applicable cure date. The redemption price per share is equal to the sum of the liquidation value per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends. Dividends on MMP shares are set weekly, and are based on a short-term index rate plus an additional spread that is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances, including a change in the credit rating assigned to the MMP shares by Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”).
The weighted average dividend rates for the year ended March 31, 2020 were as follows:
Colorado | Minnesota Municipal Fund II | National Municipal Fund | ||
2.54% | 2.46% | 2.58% |
The Funds use leverage because their portfolio managers believe that, over time, leveraging may provide opportunities for additional income and total return for common shareholders. However, the use of leverage also can expose common shareholders to additional volatility. For example, as the prices of securities held by a Fund decline, the negative impact of these valuation changes on common share net asset value and common shareholder total return is magnified by the use of leverage; accordingly, the use of structural leverage may hurt a Fund’s overall performance.
Leverage may also cause the Funds to incur certain costs. In the event that a Fund is unable to meet certain criteria (including, but not limited to, maintaining certain ratings with Fitch, funding dividend payments, or funding redemptions), that Fund will pay additional fees with respect to the leverage.
For financial reporting purposes, the MMP shares are considered debt of the issuer; therefore, the liquidation value which approximates fair value of the MMP shares is recorded as a liability in the statements of assets and liabilities. Dividends accrued and paid on the MMP shares are included as a component of interest expense in the statements of operations. The MMP shares are treated as equity for legal and tax purposes. Dividends paid to holders of the MMP shares are generally classified astax-exempt income fortax-reporting purposes.
Offering costs for MMP shares are recorded as a deferred charge and amortized over the5-year life of the MMP shares. These are presented as “Offering cost for preferred shareholders” on the “Statements of assets and liabilities” and “Offering costs” on the “Statements of operations.”
7. Geographic, Credit, and Market Risk
The Funds concentrate their investments in securities issued by municipalities. Because each of Colorado Municipal Fund and Minnesota Municipal Fund II invests substantially all of its net assets in municipal obligations of its respective state at the time of investment, events in that state may have a significant impact on the performance and investments of Colorado Municipal Fund and Minnesota Municipal Fund II.
40 |
Table of Contents
These events may include economic or political policy changes, tax base erosion, state constitutional limits on tax increases, budget deficits and other financial difficulties, changes in the credit ratings assigned to the state’s municipal issuers, the effects of natural or human-made disasters, or other economic, legislative, or political or social issues. Any downgrade to the credit rating of the securities issued by the US government may result in a downgrade of securities issued by the states or US territories. National Municipal Fund will be subject to these risks as well but to a lesser extent because it invests at least 80% of its net assets in securities, the income from which is exempt from federal income tax and is not limited to investing substantially all of its assets in municipal obligations of a single state. From time to time and consistent with its investment policies, National Municipal Fund may invest a considerable portion of its assets in certain municipalities. As of March 31, 2020, National Municipal Fund has invested 19.14%, 15.96%, 14.99%, 14.42%, and 9.23% (each as a percentage of net assets) in securities issued by the State of California, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the State of New York, State of Illinois, and the State of Texas, respectively. These investments could make National Municipal Fund more sensitive to economic conditions in those states than other more geographically diversified national municipal income funds.
Each Fund may invest a percentage of assets in obligations of governments of US territories, commonwealths, and possessions such as Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, or Guam. To the extent a Fund invests in such obligations, that Fund may be adversely affected by local political and economic conditions and developments within these US territories, commonwealths, and possessions.
In particular, there recently has been speculation that due to a weak economic outlook, high government debt levels, and credit rating downgrades by S&P and Moody’s, Puerto Rican debt obligations may be subject to a greater risk of default. In striving to manage geographic concentration risk for a Fund, DMC carefully monitors the economies of each state, region, and US territory and possession in which the Fund invests or may invest. In general, DMC believes these economies are broad enough to satisfy a Fund’s investment needs. However, there is no way to eliminate this risk when investing with a concentration in certain geographic areas.
From time to time, a fund may invest in industrial development bonds (IDBs) or pollution control revenue (PCR) bonds that are issued by a conduit authority on behalf of a corporation that is either foreign owned or has international affiliates or operations. While the bonds may be issued to finance a facility located in the United States, the bonds may be secured by a payment obligation or guaranty of the corporation. To the extent the Fund invests in such securities, that Fund may be exposed to risks associated with international investments. The risk of international investments not ordinarily associated with US investments includes fluctuation in currency values, differences in accounting principles, and/or economic or political instability in other nations.
Many municipalities insure repayment for their obligations. Although bond insurance may reduce the risk of loss due to default by an issuer, such bonds remain subject to the risk that market value may fluctuate for other reasons, and there is no assurance that the insurance company will meet its obligations. A real or perceived decline in creditworthiness of a bond insurer can have an adverse impact on the value of insured bonds held in each Fund. At March 31, 2020, the percentages of each Fund’s net assets insured by insurers are listed below and these securities have been identified on the “Schedules of investments.”
Colorado Municipal Fund | Minnesota Municipal Fund II | National Municipal Fund | |||||||||||||
Assured Guaranty Corporation | 4.22 | % | — | — | |||||||||||
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation | 7.51 | % | 0.31 | % | 1.78 | % | |||||||||
Build America Mutual Assurance Company | 1.73 | % | — | — | |||||||||||
Total | 13.46 | % | 0.31 | % | 1.78 | % |
Each Fund invests a portion of its assets in high yield fixed income securities, which are securities rated BB or lower by Standard & Poor’s (S&P) and/or Ba or lower by Moody’s, or similarly rated by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Investments in these higher yielding securities are generally accompanied by a greater degree of credit risk than higher rated securities. Additionally, lower rated securities may be more susceptible to adverse economic and competitive industry conditions than investment grade securities.
The Funds may invest in advance refunded bonds, escrow secured bonds, or defeased bonds. Under current federal tax laws and regulations, state and local government borrowers are permitted to refinance outstanding bonds by issuing new bonds. The issuer refinances the outstanding debt to either reduce interest costs or to remove or alter restrictive covenants imposed by the bonds being refinanced. A refunding transaction where the municipal securities are being refunded within 90 days from the issuance of the refunding issue is known as a “current refunding.” “Advance refunded bonds” are bonds in which the refunded bond issue remains outstanding for more than 90 days following the
(continues) | 41 |
Table of Contents
Notes to financial statements
Delaware Funds® by Macquarie Closed-End Municipal Bond Funds
7. Geographic, Credit, and Market Risk (continued)
issuance of the refunding issue. In an advance refunding, the issuer will use the proceeds of a new bond issue to purchase high-grade interest-bearing debt securities which are then deposited in an irrevocable escrow account held by an escrow agent to secure all future payments of principal and interest and bond premium of the advance refunded bond. Bonds are escrowed to maturity when the proceeds of the refunding issue are deposited in an escrow account for investment sufficient to pay all of the principal and interest on the original interest payment and maturity dates.
Bonds are considered“pre-refunded” when the refunding issue’s proceeds are escrowed only until a permitted call date or dates on the refunded issue with the refunded issue being redeemed at the time, including any required premium. Bonds become “defeased” when the rights and interests of the bondholders and of their lien on the pledged revenues or other security under the terms of the bond contract are substituted with an alternative source of revenues (the escrow securities) sufficient to meet payments of principal and interest to maturity or to the first call dates. Escrowed secured bonds will often receive a rating of AAA from Moody’s, S&P, and/or Fitch Ratings due to the strong credit quality of the escrow securities and the irrevocable nature of the escrow deposit agreement.
To the extent that the Funds invest in securities with longer duration, they may be more sensitive to fluctuation of interest rates.
Each Fund invests in certain obligations that may have liquidity protection designed to ensure that the receipt of payments due on the underlying security is timely. Such protection may be provided through guarantees, insurance policies, or letters of credit obtained by the issuer or sponsor from third parties, through various means of structuring the transaction, or through a combination of such approaches. The Funds will not pay any additional fees for such credit support, although the existence of credit support may increase the price of a security.
Each Fund may invest up to 15% of its net assets in illiquid securities, which may include securities with contractual restrictions on resale, securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and other securities which may not be readily marketable. The relative illiquidity of these securities may impair each Fund from disposing of them in a timely manner and at a fair price when it is necessary or desirable to do so. While maintaining oversight, the Boards have delegated to DMC theday-to-day functions of determining whether individual securities are liquid for purposes of each Fund’s limitation on investments in illiquid securities. Securities eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144A, which are determined to be liquid, are not subject to each Fund’s 15% limit on investments in illiquid securities. Rule 144A securities held by each Fund have been identified on the “Schedules of investments.”
8. Contractual Obligations
Each Fund enters into contracts in the normal course of business that contain a variety of indemnifications. Each Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Funds have not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts. Management has reviewed each Fund’s existing contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.
9. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2017, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU), ASU2017-08, Receivables — Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic310-20), Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities which amends the amortization period for certain callable debt securities purchased at a premium, shortening such period to the earliest call date. ASU2017-08 does not require any accounting change for debt securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. ASU2017-08 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after Dec. 15, 2018. Management has implemented ASU2017-08 and determined that the impact of this guidance to the Fund’s net assets at the end of the period is not material.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU2018-13, which changes certain fair value measurement disclosure requirements. ASU2018-13, in addition to other modifications and additions, removes the requirement to disclose the amount and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the policy for the timing of transfers between levels and the valuation process for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU2018-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after Dec. 15, 2019. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of these changes on the financial statements.
42 |
Table of Contents
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) – Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. The amendments in ASU2020-04 provides optional temporary financial reporting relief from the effect of certain types of contract modifications due to the planned discontinuation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and other interbank-offered based reference rates as of the end of 2021. ASU2020-04 is effective for certain reference rate-related contract modifications that occur during the period March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. Management is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of applying this ASU.
10. Subsequent Events
Beginning in January 2020, global financial markets have experienced and may continue to experience significant volatility resulting from the spread of a novel coronavirus known as COVID-19. The outbreak of COVID-19 has resulted in travel and border restrictions, quarantines, supply chain disruptions, lower consumer demand and general market uncertainty. The effects of COVID-19 have and may continue to adversely affect the global economy, the economies of certain nations and individual issuers, all of which may negatively impact the Funds’ performance.
Management has determined that no other material events or transactions occurred subsequent to March 31, 2020, that would require recognition or disclosure in the Funds’ financial statements.
(continues) | 43 |
Table of Contents
registered public accounting firm
To the Board of Trustees/Directors and Shareholders of Delaware Investments® Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc., Delaware Investments Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc. and Delaware Investments National Municipal Income Fund
Opinions on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the schedules of investments, of Delaware Investments® Colorado Municipal Income Fund, Inc., Delaware Investments Minnesota Municipal Income Fund II, Inc. and Delaware Investments National Municipal Income Fund (hereafter collectively referred to as the “Funds”) as of March 31, 2020, the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2020, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2020, including the related notes, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended March 31, 2020 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of each of the Funds as of March 31, 2020, the results of each of their operations and each of their cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in each of their net assets for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2020 and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended March 31, 2020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinions
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Funds’ financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Funds in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of March 31, 2020 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
May 26, 2020
We have served as the auditor of one or more investment companies in Delaware Funds® by Macquarie since 2010.
44
Table of Contents
(Unaudited)
Delaware Funds® by MacquarieClosed-End Municipal Bond Funds
Tax Information (Unaudited)
The information set forth below is for each Fund’s fiscal year as required by federal income tax laws. Shareholders, however, must report distributions on a calendar year basis for income tax purposes, which may include distributions for portions of two fiscal years of a fund. Accordingly, the information needed by shareholders for income tax purposes will be sent to them in January of each year. Please consult your tax advisor for proper treatment of this information.
All disclosures are based on financial information available as of the date of this annual report and, accordingly are subject to change. For any and all items requiring reporting, it is the intention of each Fund to report the maximum amount permitted under the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder.
For the year ended March 31, 2020, each Fund reports distributions paid during the year as follows:
(A) Ordinary Income Distributions (Tax Basis) | (B) Tax-Exempt Income Distributions (Tax Basis) | (C) Long-Term Capital Gain Distributions (Tax Basis) | Total Distributions (Tax Basis) | |||||||||||||||||
Colorado Municipal Fund | — | 83.57 | % | 16.43 | % | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||
Minnesota Municipal Fund II | 0.02 | % | 95.36 | % | 4.62 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||
National Municipal Fund | 5.51 | % | 83.41 | % | 11.08 | % | 100.00 | % |
(A) and (B) are based on a percentage of each Fund’s total distributions.
Fund management
Gregory A. Gizzi
Managing Director, Head of Municipal Bonds, Senior Portfolio Manager
Gregory A. Gizzi is head of municipal bonds for Macquarie Investment Management Fixed Income (MFI) in the Americas, a role he assumed in February 2019. In this role, he is responsible for the overall operation of the strategy and is team lead on several of thetax-exempt strategies. Additionally, Gizzi continues to be responsible for MFI’s taxable municipal business and the marketing efforts for the municipal product. Previously, Gizzi wasco-portfolio manager of the firm’s municipal bond funds and several client accounts, a role he held since November 2011. Before joining Macquarie Investment Management in January 2008 as head of municipal bond trading, he spent six years as a vice president at Lehman Brothers for the firm’stax-exempt institutional sales effort. Prior to that, he spent two years trading corporate bonds for UBS before joining Lehman Brothers in a sales capacity. Gizzi has more than 20 years of trading experience in the municipal securities industry, beginning at Kidder Peabody in 1984, where he started as a municipal bond trader and worked his way up to institutional block trading desk manager. He later worked in the same capacity at Dillon Read. Gizzi earned his bachelor’s degree in economics from Harvard University.
Stephen J. Czepiel
Managing Director, Head of Municipal Bonds Portfolio Management, Senior Portfolio Manager
Stephen J. Czepiel leads the portfolio management of the firm’s municipal bonds strategies for Macquarie Investment Management Fixed Income (MFI) in the Americas, a role he assumed in February 2019. He is aco-portfolio manager of the firm’s municipal bond funds and client accounts, a role he has held since August 2007. He joined Macquarie Investment Management in July 2004 as a senior bond trader. Previously, he was vice president at both Mesirow Financial and Loop Capital Markets. He began his career in the securities industry in 1982 as a municipal bond trader at Kidder Peabody and now has more than 20 years of experience in the municipal securities industry. Czepiel earned his bachelor’s degree in finance and economics from Duquesne University.
(continues) | 45 |
Table of Contents
Other Fund information
(Unaudited)
Delaware Funds® by MacquarieClosed-End Municipal Bond Funds .
Jake van Roden
Senior Vice President, Head of Municipal Trading, Portfolio Manager
Jake van Roden is head of municipal trading for Macquarie Investment Management Fixed Income (MFI) in the Americas. He is also a portfolio manager for MFI’s nineopen-end state-specific municipal bond funds, as well as for several municipal bond client accounts, a role he assumed in December 2017. In February 2019, his portfolio management role expanded to include MFI’sclosed-end municipal bond funds and the three national municipalopen-end funds. He joined the municipal department in July 2004 as a generalist and became head of municipal trading in December 2012. Before that, van Roden interned at Macquarie Investment Management in the client services department. He received a bachelor’s degree in American studies with a minor in government from Franklin & Marshall College.
Denise A. Franchetti, CFA
Senior Vice President,Co-Head of Municipal Credit Research, Portfolio Manager
Denise A. Franchetti isco-head of the company’s municipal research operations within Macquarie Investment Management Fixed Income (MFI) in the Americas, a role she assumed in January 2018. Previously, she was a senior municipal analyst for the municipal bond department, responsible for following the airport, education, hotel, cogeneration, and cargo sectors. In 2003, she was also named as portfolio manager on thetax-exemptclosed-end funds in addition to her research duties. Prior to joining Macquarie Investment Management in 1997 as a municipal bond analyst, she was a fixed income trader at Provident Mutual Life Insurance and an investment analyst at General Accident Insurance. Franchetti received her bachelor’s degree and an MBA from La Salle University. She is a member of the CFA Institute, the Financial Analysts of Philadelphia, and the National Federation of Municipal Analysts.
46
Table of Contents
Board of trustees / directors and officers addendum
Delaware Funds® by Macquarie
A fund is governed by a Board of Trustees / Directors (“Trustees”), which has oversight responsibility for the management of a fund’s business affairs. Trustees establish procedures and oversee and review the performance of the investment manager and others who perform services for the fund. The independent fund trustees, in particular, are advocates for shareholder interests. Each trustee has served in that capacity since he or she was elected to or appointed to the Board of Trustees, and will continue to serve until his or her retirement or the election of a new trustee in his or her place. The following is a list of the Trustees and Officers with certain background and related information.
Name, Address, and Birth Date | Position(s) Held with Fund(s) | Length of Time Served | Principal During the Past Five Years | Number of or Officer | Other Directorships Held by Trustee or Officer | |||||
Interested Trustee | ||||||||||
Shawn K. Lytle1 2005 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 February 1970 | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Trustee | President and Chief Executive Officer since August 2015
Trustee since September 2015 | President — Macquarie Investment Management2 (June 2015-Present) Regional Head of Americas — UBS Global Asset Management (April2010-May 2015)
| 95 | Trustee — UBS Relationship Funds, SMA Relationship Trust, and UBS Funds (May 2010–April 2015) | |||||
Independent Trustees | ||||||||||
Thomas L. Bennett 2005 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 October 1947 | Chair and Trustee | Trustee since March 2005
Chair since March 2015
| Private Investor (March 2004–Present) | 95 | None | |||||
Jerome D. Abernathy 2005 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 July 1959 | Trustee | Since January 2019 | Managing Member, Stonebrook Capital Management, LLC (financial technology: macro factors and databases) (January 1993-Present)
| 95 | None | |||||
Ann D. Borowiec 2005 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 November 1958 | Trustee | Since March 2015 | Chief Executive Officer, Private Wealth Management (2011–2013) and Market Manager, New Jersey Private Bank (2005–2011) — J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. | 95 | Director — Banco Santander International (October 2016–December 2019)
Director — Santander Bank, N.A. (December 2016–December 2019)
| |||||
Joseph W. Chow 2005 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 January 1953 | Trustee | Since January 2013 | Private Investor (April 2011–Present) | 95 | Director and Audit Committee Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (July 2004–July 2014) |
(continues) | 47 |
Table of Contents
Board of trustees / directors and officers addendum
Delaware Funds® by Macquarie
Name, Address, and Birth Date | Position(s) Held with Fund(s) | Length of Time Served | Principal Past Five Years | Number of or Officer | Other Directorships Held by Trustee or Officer | |||||
Independent Trustees (continued) | ||||||||||
John A. Fry 2005 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 May 1960 | Trustee | Since January 2001 | President — Drexel University (August 2010–Present)
President — Franklin & Marshall College (July 2002–June 2010) | 95 | Director; Compensation Committee and Governance Committee Member — Community Health Systems (May 2004–Present)
Director — Drexel Morgan & Co. (2015–2019)
Director and Audit Committee Member — vTv Therapeutics LLC (2017–Present)
Director and Audit Committee Member — FS Credit Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. (2018–Present)
Director — Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (January 2020–Present)
| |||||
Lucinda S. Landreth 2005 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 June 1947
| Trustee | Since March 2005 | Private Investor (2004–Present) | 95 | None | |||||
Frances A. Sevilla-Sacasa 2005 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 January 1956 | Trustee | Since September 2011 | Private Investor (January 2017–Present)
Chief Executive Officer — Banco Itaú International (April 2012–December 2016)
Executive Advisor to Dean (August 2011–March 2012) and Interim Dean (January 2011–July 2011) — University of Miami School of Business Administration
President — U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management (Private Banking) (July 2007-December 2008)
| 95 | Trust Manager and Audit Committee Chair — Camden Property Trust (August 2011–Present)
Director; Strategic Planning and Reserves Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee Member — Callon Petroleum Company (December 2019–Present)
Director; Audit Committee Member — Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. (March 2018–December 2019) |
48
Table of Contents
Name, Address, and Birth Date
| Position(s)
| Length of Time Served
| Principal During the
| Number of
| Other Directorships Held by Trustee
| |||||
Thomas K. Whitford |
Trustee |
Since January 2013 |
Vice Chairman |
95 | Director — HSBC North America Holdings Inc. (December 2013–Present)
Director —
Director —
Director — HSBC Finance Corporation (December 2013–April 2018)
| |||||
Christianna Wood |
Trustee |
Since January 2019 |
Chief Executive Officer and President — Gore Creek Capital, Ltd. (August 2009–Present) |
95 |
Director; Finance Committee and Audit Committee Member — H&R Block Corporation (July 2008–Present)
Director; Investments Committee, Capital and Finance Committee, and Audit Committee Insurance (2013–Present)
Trustee; Chair of Nominating and Governance Committee and Audit Committee Member — The Merger Fund (2013–Present), The Merger Fund VL (2013–Present); WCM Alternatives: Event-Driven Fund (2013–Present), and WCM Alternatives: Credit Event Fund (December 2017–Present)
Director; Chair of Governance Committee and Audit Committee Member — International Securities Exchange (2010–2016)
|
(continues) | 49 |
Table of Contents
Board of trustees / directors and officers addendum
Delaware Funds® by Macquarie
Name, Address, and Birth Date
| Position(s) Held with Fund(s)
| Length of Time Served
| Principal During the Past Five Years
| Number of
| Other Directorships Held by Trustee or Officer
| |||||
Janet L. Yeomans |
Trustee |
Since April 1999 |
Vice President and Treasurer (January 2006–July 2012), Vice President — Mergers & Acquisitions (January 2003–January 2006), and Vice President and Treasurer (July 1995–January 2003) — 3M Company
|
95 |
Director; Personnel and Compensation Committee Chair; Member of Nominating, Investments, and Audit Committees for various periods throughout directorship — Okabena Company
| |||||
Officers
| ||||||||||
David F. Connor
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary
| �� |
Senior Vice President, since May 2013; General Counsel since May 2015; Secretary since October 2005
|
David F. Connor has served in various capacities at different times at Macquarie Investment Management.
|
95 |
None3 | ||||
Daniel V. Geatens
|
Vice President |
Vice President and Treasurer since October 2007
|
Daniel V. Geatens has served in various capacities at different times at Macquarie Investment Management.
|
95 |
None3 | |||||
Richard Salus
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since November 2006
|
Richard Salus has served in various capacities at different times at Macquarie Investment Management.
| 95 | None |
1 | Shawn K. Lytle is considered to be an “Interested Trustee” because he is an executive officer of the Fund’s(s’) investment advisor. |
2 | Macquarie Investment Management is the marketing name for Macquarie Management Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including the Fund’s(s’) investment manager. |
3 | David F. Connor and Daniel V. Geatens serve in similar capacities for the six portfolios of the Optimum Fund Trust, which have the same investment advisor as the registrant. Mr. Geatens also serves as the Chief Financial Officer of the Optimum Fund Trust and he is the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for Macquarie Global Infrastructure Total Return Fund Inc. |
50
Table of Contents
This annual report is for the information of Delaware Funds® by MacquarieClosed-End Municipal Bond Funds shareholders.
Board of directors/trustees
Shawn K. Lytle
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Delaware Funds by Macquarie
Philadelphia, PA
Thomas L. Bennett
Chairman of the Board
Delaware Funds by Macquarie
Private Investor
Rosemont, PA
Jerome D. Abernathy†
Managing Member
Stonebrook Capital
Management, LLC
Jersey City, NJ
Ann D. Borowiec
Former Chief Executive Officer Private Wealth Management
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
New York, NY
Joseph W. Chow
Former Executive Vice President
State Street Corporation
Boston, MA
John A. Fry†
President Drexel University
Philadelphia, PA
Lucinda S. Landreth
Former Chief Investment Officer
Assurant, Inc.
New York, NY
Frances A. Sevilla-Sacasa
Former Chief Executive Officer
Banco Itaú International
Miami, FL
Thomas K. Whitford†
Former Vice Chairman
PNC Financial Services Group Pittsburgh, PA
†Audit committee member
Christianna Wood†
Chief Executive Officer and President
Gore Creek Capital, Ltd.
Golden, CO
Janet L. Yeomans
Former Vice President and Treasurer
3M Company
St. Paul, MN
Affiliated officers
David F. Connor
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel, and Secretary
Delaware Funds by Macquarie
Philadelphia, PA
Daniel V. Geatens
Vice President and Treasurer
Delaware Funds by Macquarie
Philadelphia, PA
Richard Salus
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Delaware Funds by Macquarie Philadelphia, PA
Investment manager
Delaware Management Company, a series of Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust (MIMBT) Philadelphia, PA
Principal office of the Funds
2005 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-7057
Independent registered public accounting firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
2001 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Registrar and stock transfer agent
Computershare, Inc.
480 Washington Blvd.
Jersey City, NJ 07310
866437-0252
For securities dealers and financial institutions representatives
800362-7500
Website
delawarefunds.com/closed-end
Number of recordholders as of
March 31, 2020
Colorado Municipal Fund 50
Minnesota Municipal Fund II 268
National Municipal Fund 56
Your reinvestment options
Each of the Funds offers an automatic dividend reinvestment program. If you would like to reinvest dividends, and shares are registered in your name, contact Computershare, Inc. at 866437-0252. You will be asked to put your request in writing. If you have shares registered in “street” name, contact the broker/dealer holding the shares or your financial advisor. If you choose to receive your dividends in cash, you may now elect to receive them by ACH transfer. Contact Computershare at the number above for more information.
Each Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on FormN-PORT. Each Fund’s FormsN-PORT, as well as a description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to determine how to vote proxies (if any) relating to portfolio securities, are available without charge (i) upon request, by calling 866437-0252; and (ii) on the SEC’s website at sec.gov. In addition, a description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to determine how to vote proxies (if any) relating to portfolio securities and the Schedules of Investments included in the Funds’ most recent FormsN-PORT are available without charge on the Funds’ website atdelawarefunds.com/closed-end. Each Fund’s FormsN-PORT may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C.; information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800SEC-0330.
Information (if any) regarding how each Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recently disclosed12-month period ended June 30 is available without charge (i) through the Funds’ website at delawarefunds.com/proxy; and (ii) on the SEC’s website at sec.gov.
51
Item 2. Code of Ethics
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party. A copy of the registrant’s Code of Business Ethics has been posted on the Delaware Funds®by Macquarie Internet Web site at www.delawarefunds.com. Any amendments to the Code of Business Ethics, and information on any waiver from its provisions granted by the registrant, will also be posted on this Web site within five business days of such amendment or waiver and will remain on the Web site for at least 12 months.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The registrant’s Board of Directors has determined that certain members of the registrant’s Audit Committee are audit committee financial experts, as defined below. For purposes of this item, an “audit committee financial expert” is a person who has the following attributes:
a. An understanding of generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements;
b. The ability to assess the general application of such principles in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals, and reserves;
c. Experience preparing, auditing, analyzing, or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the registrant’s financial statements, or experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities;
d. An understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting; and
e. An understanding of audit committee functions.
An “audit committee financial expert” shall have acquired such attributes through:
a. Education and experience as a principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, public accountant, or auditor or experience in one or more positions that involve the performance of similar functions;
b. Experience actively supervising a principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, public accountant, auditor, or person performing similar functions;
c. Experience overseeing or assessing the performance of companies or public accountants with respect to the preparation, auditing, or evaluation of financial statements; or
d. Other relevant experience.
The registrant’s Board of Directors has also determined that each member of the registrant’s Audit Committee is independent. In order to be “independent” for purposes of this item, the Audit Committee member may not: (i) other than in his or her capacity as a member of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof, accept directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the issuer; or (ii) be an “interested person” of the registrant as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The names of the audit committee financial experts on the registrant’s Audit Committee are set forth below:
Jerome D. Abernathy
John A. Fry
Thomas K. Whitford, Chair
Christianna Wood
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
(a)Audit fees.
The aggregate fees billed for services provided to the registrant by its independent auditors for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and for services normally provided by the independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were $39,200 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020.
The aggregate fees billed for services provided to the registrant by its independent auditors for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and for services normally provided by the independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were $38,430 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019.
(b)Audit-related fees.
The aggregate fees billed by the registrant’s independent auditors for services relating to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item were $0 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020.
The aggregate fees billed by the registrant’s independent auditors for services relating to the performance of the audit of the financial statements of the registrant’s investment adviser and other service providers under common control with the adviser and that relate directly to the operations or financial reporting of the registrant were $909,000 for the registrant’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2020. The percentage of these fees relating to services approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to thedeminimis exception from the pre-approval requirement in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X was 0%. These audit-related services were as follows: year-end audit procedures; group reporting and subsidiary statutory audits.
The aggregate fees billed by the registrant’s independent auditors for services relating to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item were $0 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019.
The aggregate fees billed by the registrant’s independent auditors for services relating to the performance of the audit of the financial statements of the registrant’s investment adviser and other service providers under common control with the adviser and that relate directly to the operations or financial reporting of the registrant were $640,000 for the registrant’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. The percentage of these fees relating to services approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to thedeminimis exception from the pre-approval requirement in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X was 0%. These audit-related services were as follows: year-end audit procedures; group reporting and subsidiary statutory audits.
(c)Tax fees.
The aggregate fees billed by the registrant’s independent auditors for tax-related services provided to the registrant were $3,500 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020. The percentage of these fees relating to services approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to thedeminimis exception from the pre-approval requirement in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X was 0%. These tax-related services were as follows: review of income tax returns and review of annual excise distribution calculations.
The aggregate fees billed by the registrant’s independent auditors for tax-related services provided to the registrant’s investment adviser and other service providers under common control with the adviser and that relate directly to the operations or financial reporting of the registrant were $0 for the registrant’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2020. The percentage of these fees relating to services approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to thedeminimis exception from the pre-approval requirement in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X was 0%.
The aggregate fees billed by the registrant’s independent auditors for tax-related services provided to the registrant were $4,728 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. The percentage of these fees relating to services approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to thedeminimis exception from the pre-approval requirement in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X was 0%. These tax-related services were as follows: review of income tax returns and review of annual excise distribution calculations.
The aggregate fees billed by the registrant’s independent auditors for tax-related services provided to the registrant’s investment adviser and other service providers under common control with the adviser and that relate directly to the operations or financial reporting of the registrant were $0 for the registrant’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. The percentage of these fees relating to services approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to thedeminimis exception from the pre-approval requirement in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X was 0%.
(d)All other fees.
The aggregate fees billed for all services provided by the independent auditors to the registrant other than those set forth in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of this Item were $0 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020.
The aggregate fees billed for all services other than those set forth in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this Item provided by the registrant’s independent auditors to the registrant’s adviser and other service providers under common control with the adviser and that relate directly to the operations or financial reporting of the registrant were $0 for the registrant’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2020. The percentage of these fees relating to services approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to thedeminimis exception from the pre-approval requirement in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X was 0%.
The aggregate fees billed for all services provided by the independent auditors to the registrant other than those set forth in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of this Item were $0 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019.
The aggregate fees billed for all services other than those set forth in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this Item provided by the registrant’s independent auditors to the registrant’s adviser and other service providers under common control with the adviser and that relate directly to the operations or financial reporting of the registrant were $0 for the registrant’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. The percentage of these fees relating to services approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to thedeminimis exception from the pre-approval requirement in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X was 0%.
(e) The registrant’s Audit Committee has established pre-approval policies and procedures as permitted by Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(B) of Regulation S-X (the “Pre-Approval Policy”) with respect to services provided by the registrant’s independent auditors. Pursuant to the Pre-Approval Policy, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the services set forth in the table below with respect to the registrant up to the specified fee limits. Certain fee limits are based on aggregate fees to the registrant and other registrants within the Delaware Funds®by Macquarie.
Service | Range of Fees |
Audit Services | |
Statutory audits or financial audits for new Funds | up to $40,000 per Fund |
Services associated with SEC registration statements (e.g., Form N-1A, Form N-14, etc.), periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or other documents issued in connection with securities offerings (e.g., comfort letters for closed-end Fund offerings, consents), and assistance in responding to SEC comment letters | up to $10,000 per Fund |
Consultations by Fund management as to the accounting or disclosure treatment of transactions or events and/or the actual or potential impact of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by the SEC, FASB, or other regulatory or standard-setting bodies (Note: Under SEC rules, some consultations may be considered “audit-related services” rather than “audit services”) | up to $25,000 in the aggregate |
Audit-Related Services | |
Consultations by Fund management as to the accounting or disclosure treatment of transactions or events and /or the actual or potential impact of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by the SEC, FASB, or other regulatory or standard-setting bodies (Note: Under SEC rules, some consultations may be considered “audit services” rather than “audit-related services”) | up to $25,000 in the aggregate |
Tax Services | |
U.S. federal, state and local and international tax planning and advice (e.g., consulting on statutory, regulatory or administrative developments, evaluation of Funds’ tax compliance function, etc.) | up to $25,000 in the aggregate |
U.S. federal, state and local tax compliance (e.g., excise distribution reviews, etc.) | up to $5,000 per Fund |
Review of federal, state, local and international income, franchise and other tax returns | up to $5,000 per Fund |
Under the Pre-Approval Policy, the Audit Committee has also pre-approved the services set forth in the table below with respect to the registrant’s investment adviser and other entities controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provide ongoing services to the registrant (the “Control Affiliates”) up to the specified fee limit. This fee limit is based on aggregate fees to the investment adviser and its Control Affiliates.
Service | Range of Fees |
Non-Audit Services | |
Services associated with periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC and assistance in responding to SEC comment letters | up to $10,000 in the aggregate |
The Pre-Approval Policy requires the registrant’s independent auditors to report to the Audit Committee at each of its regular meetings regarding all services initiated since the last such report was rendered, including those services authorized by the Pre-Approval Policy.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the registrant’s independent auditors for services rendered to the registrant and to its investment adviser and other service providers under common control with the adviser were $4,687,000 and $11,748,000 for the registrant’s fiscal years ended March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019, respectively.
(h) In connection with its selection of the independent auditors, the registrant’s Audit Committee has considered the independent auditors’ provision of non-audit services to the registrant’s investment adviser and other service providers under common control with the adviser that were not required to be pre-approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X. The Audit Committee has determined that the independent auditors’ provision of these services is compatible with maintaining the auditors’ independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
The registrant has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The members of the registrant’s Audit Committee are Jerome D. Abernathy, John A. Fry, Thomas K. Whitford and Christianna Wood.
Item 6. Investments
(a) Included as part of report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
(b) Divestment of securities in accordance with Section 13(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
The registrant has formally delegated to its investment adviser (the “Adviser”) the responsibility for making all proxy voting decisions in relation to portfolio securities held by the registrant. If and when proxies need to be voted on behalf of the registrant, the Adviser will vote such proxies pursuant to its Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures (the “Procedures”). The Adviser has established a Proxy Voting Committee (the “Committee”), which is responsible for overseeing the Adviser’s proxy voting process for the registrant. One of the main responsibilities of the Committee is to review and approve the Procedures to ensure that the Procedures are designed to allow the Adviser to vote proxies in a manner consistent with the goal of voting in the best interests of the registrant.
In order to facilitate the actual process of voting proxies, the Adviser has contracted with Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”) to analyze proxy statements on behalf of the registrant and other Adviser clients and vote proxies generally in accordance with the Procedures. The Committee is responsible for overseeing ISS’s proxy voting activities. If a proxy has been voted for the registrant, ISS will create a record of the vote. By no later than August 31 of each year, information (if any) regarding how the registrant voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recently disclosed 12-month period ended June 30 is available without charge (i) through the registrant’s website at delawarefunds.com/proxy; and (ii) on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov.
The Procedures contain a general guideline stating that recommendations of company management on an issue (particularly routine issues) should be given a fair amount of weight in determining how proxy issues should be voted. However, the Adviser will normally vote against management’s position when it runs counter to its specific Proxy Voting Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), and the Adviser will also vote against management’s recommendation when it believes that such position is not in the best interests of the registrant.
As stated above, the Procedures also list specific Guidelines on how to vote proxies on behalf of the registrant. Some examples of the Guidelines are as follows: (i) generally vote for shareholder proposals asking that a majority or more of directors be independent; (ii) generally vote against proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote; (iii) votes on mergers and acquisitions should be considered on a case-by-case basis; (iv) generally vote against proposals at companies with more than one class of common stock to increase the number of authorized shares of the class that has superior voting rights;(v) generally vote re-incorporation proposals on a case-by-case basis; (vi) votes with respect to equity-based compensation plans are generally determined on a case-by-case basis; and (vii) generally vote for requests for reports on the feasibility of developing renewable energy resources unless the report is duplicative of existing disclosure or irrelevant to the company’s line of business.
Because the registrant has delegated proxy voting to the Adviser, the registrant is not expected to encounter any conflict of interest issues regarding proxy voting and therefore does not have procedures regarding this matter. However, the Adviser does have a section in its Procedures that addresses the possibility of conflicts of interest. Most proxies that the Adviser receives on behalf of the registrant are voted by ISS in accordance with the Procedures. Because almost all of the registrant proxies are voted by ISS pursuant to the predetermined Procedures, it normally will not be necessary for the Adviser to make an actual determination of how to vote a particular proxy, thereby largely eliminating conflicts of interest for the Adviser during the proxy voting process. In the very limited instances where the Adviser is considering voting a proxy contrary to ISS’s recommendation, the Committee will first assess the issue to see if there is any possible conflict of interest involving the Adviser or affiliated persons of the Adviser. If a member of the Committee has actual knowledge of a conflict of interest, the Committee will normally use another independent third party to do additional research on the particular proxy issue in order to make a recommendation to the Committee on how to vote the proxy in the best interests of the registrant. The Committee will then review the proxy voting materials and recommendation provided by ISS and the independent third party to determine how to vote the issue in a manner that the Committee believes is consistent with the Procedures and in the best interests of the registrant.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
The information in the annual report under “Other Fund information – Fund management” is incorporated by reference into this Item 8.
Other Accounts Managed
The following chart lists certain information about types of other accounts for which each portfolio manager is primarily responsible as of March 31, 2020, unless otherwise noted. Any accounts managed in a personal capacity appear under “Other Accounts” along with the other accounts managed on a professional basis.
No. of Accounts with | Total Assets in Accounts | |||
No. of | Total Assets | Performance- | with Performance- | |
Accounts | Managed | Based Fees | Based Fees | |
Gregory A. Gizzi | ||||
Registered Investment | 23 | $6.5 billion | 0 | $0 |
Companies | ||||
Other Pooled | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
Investment Vehicles | ||||
Other Accounts | 38 | $3.8 billion | 0 | $0 |
Stephen J. Czepiel | ||||
Registered Investment | 23 | $6.5 billion | 0 | $0 |
Companies | ||||
Other Pooled | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
Investment Vehicles | ||||
Other Accounts | 23 | $3.3 billion | 0 | $0 |
Denise A. Franchetti | ||||
Registered Investment | 3 | $430.9 million | 0 | $0 |
Companies | ||||
Other Pooled | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
Investment Vehicles | ||||
Other Accounts | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
Jake van Roden | ||||
Registered Investment | 21 | $5.8 billion | 0 | $0 |
Companies | ||||
Other Pooled | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
Investment Vehicles | ||||
Other Accounts | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Individual portfolio managers may perform investment management services for other funds or accounts similar to those provided to the Funds and the investment action for such other fund or account and the Funds may differ. For example, an account or fund may be selling a security, while another account or fund may be purchasing or holding the same security. As a result, transactions executed for one fund or account may adversely affect the value of securities held by another fund, account or the Funds. Additionally, the management of multiple other funds or accounts and the Funds may give rise to potential conflicts of interest, as a portfolio manager must allocate time and effort to multiple other funds or accounts and the Funds. A portfolio manager may discover an investment opportunity that may be suitable for more than one account or fund. The investment opportunity may be limited, however, so that all funds or accounts for which the investment would be suitable may not be able to participate. The Adviser has adopted procedures designed to allocate investments fairly across multiple funds or accounts.
Some of the accounts managed by the portfolio managers have a performance-based fee. This compensation structure presents a potential conflict of interest. The portfolio manager has an incentive to manage this account so as to enhance its performance, to the possible detriment of other accounts for which the investment manager does not receive a performance-based fee.
A portfolio manager’s management of personal accounts also may present certain conflicts of interest. While Delaware’s code of ethics is designed to address these potential conflicts, there is no guarantee that it will do so.
Compensation Structure
Each portfolio’s manager’s compensation consists of the following:
Base Salary -Each named portfolio manager receives a fixed base salary. Salaries are determined by a comparison to industry data prepared by third parties to ensure that portfolio manager salaries are in line with salaries paid at peer investment advisory firms.
Bonus-An objective component is added to the bonus for each manager that is reflective of account performance relative to an appropriate peer group or database. The following paragraph describes the structure of the non-guaranteed bonus.
Each portfolio manager is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus, which is based on quantitative and qualitative factors. There is one pool for bonus payments for the fixed income department. The pool is allotted based on subjective factors and objective factors. The amount of the pool for bonus payments is determined by assets managed (including investment companies, insurance product-related accounts and other separate accounts), management fees and related expenses (including fund waiver expenses) for registered investment companies, pooled vehicles, and managed separate accounts. For investment companies, each manager is compensated according to the Fund’s Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (formerly, Lipper Inc.) or Morningstar peer group percentile ranking on a 1-, 3-, and 5-year basis, with longer term performance more heavily weighted. For managed separate accounts the portfolio managers are compensated according to the composite percentile ranking against the eVestment Alliance database (or similar sources of relative performance data) on a one-, three-, and five-year basis, with longer term performance more heavily weighted; composite performance relative to the benchmark is also evaluated for the same time periods. Incentives reach maximum potential at the top 25th-30th percentile. The remaining portion of the bonus is discretionary as determined by Macquarie Investment Management and takes into account subjective factors.
For new and recently transitioned portfolio managers, the compensation may be weighted more heavily towards a portfolio manager’s actual contribution and ability to influence performance, rather than longer-term performance. Management intends to move the compensation structure towards longer-term performance for these portfolio managers over time.
Portfolio managers participate in retention programs, including the Macquarie Investment Management Notional Investment Plan and the Macquarie Group Employee Retained Equity Plan, for alignment of interest purposes.
Macquarie Investment Management Notional Investment Plan— A portion of a portfolio manager’s retained profit share may be notionally exposed to the return of certain funds within MIM Funds pursuant to the terms of the Macquarie Investment Management Notional Investment Plan. The retained amount will vest in equal tranches over a period ranging from four to five years after the date of investment (depending on the level of the employee).
Macquarie Group Employee Retained Equity Plan— A portion of a portfolio manager’s retained profit share may be invested in the Macquarie Group Employee Retained Equity Plan (“MEREP”), which is used to deliver remuneration in the form of Macquarie equity. The main type of award currently being offered under the MEREP is units comprising a beneficial interest in a Macquarie share held in a trust for the employee, subject to the vesting and forfeiture provisions of the MEREP. Subject to vesting conditions, vesting and release of the shares occurs in a period ranging from four to five years after the date of investment (depending on the level of the employee).
Other Compensation- Portfolio managers may also participate in benefit plans and programs available generally to all similarly situated employees.
Ownership of Securities
As of March 31, 2020, the portfolio managers did not own any shares of the Fund.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of the filing of this report and have concluded that they are effective in providing reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant in its reports or statements filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
There were no significant changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the report to stockholders included herein that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 13. Exhibits
(a) (1) Code of Ethics
Not applicable.
(3) Written solicitations to purchase securities pursuant to Rule 23c-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Not applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf, by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DELAWARE INVESTMENTS® COLORADO MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND, INC.
SHAWN K. LYTLE | |
By: | Shawn K. Lytle |
Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date: | June 4, 2020 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SHAWN K. LYTLE | |
By: | Shawn K. Lytle |
Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date: | June 4, 2020 |
RICHARD SALUS | |
By: | Richard Salus |
Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
Date: | June 4, 2020 |