UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
Commission File No. 000-22166
AETRIUM INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 41-1439182 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2350 Helen Street, North St. Paul, Minnesota ( Address of principal executive offices) | 55109 (Zip Code) |
(651) 770-2000
(Registrant's telephone number including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes RNo £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes £No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,“ “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer £ | Accelerated filer £ | Non-accelerated filer £ | Smaller reporting company R |
Indicate by a checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £No R
Number of shares of Common Stock, $.001 par value, outstanding on May 1, 2009 | 10,598,131 | |
AETRIUM INCORPORATED
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements | |
| | |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 | 3 |
| | |
| Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 | 4 |
| | |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 | 5 |
| | |
| Notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements | 6-10 |
| | |
Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 11-14 |
| | |
Item 4T. | Controls and Procedures | 14-15 |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 16 |
| | |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 16 |
| | |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 16 |
| | |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 16 |
| | |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 16 |
| | |
Item 5. | Other Information | 16 |
| | |
Item 6. | Exhibits | 16 |
| | |
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 31.3
EXHIBIT 32.1
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
AETRIUM INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Current assets: | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 11,158 | | | $ | 11,629 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 1,219 | | | | 1,539 | |
Inventories | | | 8,594 | | | | 9,162 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 127 | | | | 127 | |
Other current assets | | | 332 | | | | 298 | |
Total current assets | | | 21,430 | | | | 22,755 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property and equipment: | | | | | | | | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 521 | | | | 521 | |
Equipment | | | 1,222 | | | | 1,204 | |
| | | 1,743 | | | | 1,725 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (1,597 | ) | | | (1,582 | ) |
Property and equipment, net | | | 146 | | | | 143 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 2,887 | | | | 2,489 | |
Other assets | | | 187 | | | | 215 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 24,650 | | | $ | 25,602 | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities: | | | | | | |
Current portion of long-term debt | | $ | — | | | $ | 12 | |
Trade accounts payable | | | 296 | | | | 571 | |
Accrued compensation | | | 339 | | | | 286 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 517 | | | | 633 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 1,152 | | | | 1,502 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt, less current portion | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Shareholders' equity: | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, $.001 par value; shares authorized: 30,000,000; shares issued and outstanding: 10,598,131 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 | | | 11 | | | | 11 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 63,803 | | | | 63,665 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (40,316 | ) | | | (39,576 | ) |
Total shareholders' equity | | | 23,498 | | | | 24,100 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | | $ | 24,650 | | | $ | 25,602 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
AETRIUM INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
| | Three months ended March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 1,751 | | | $ | 5,635 | |
Cost of goods sold | | | 1,251 | | | | 2,859 | |
Gross profit | | | 500 | | | | 2,776 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 1,200 | | | | 1,702 | |
Research and development | | | 475 | | | | 776 | |
Total operating expenses | | | 1,675 | | | | 2,478 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | (1,175 | ) | | | 298 | |
Interest income, net | | | 38 | | | | 120 | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | (1,137 | ) | | | 418 | |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | | 397 | | | | (155 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (740 | ) | | $ | 263 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.07 | ) | | $ | 0.02 | |
Diluted | | $ | (0.07 | ) | | $ | 0.02 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 10,598 | | | | 10,554 | |
Diluted | | | 10,598 | | | | 10,829 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
AETRIUM INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
| | Three months ended March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (740 | ) | | $ | 263 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net | | | | | | | | |
cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation expense | | | 15 | | | | 27 | |
Share-based compensation expense | | | 138 | | | | 109 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | (398 | ) | | | 155 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | 320 | | | | 894 | |
Inventories | | | 568 | | | | (378 | ) |
Other current assets | | | (33 | ) | | | 32 | |
Other assets | | | 1 | | | | 21 | |
Trade accounts payable | | | (275 | ) | | | 60 | |
Accrued compensation | | | 53 | | | | (81 | ) |
Other accrued liabilities | | | (116 | ) | | | (367 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | | (467 | ) | | | 735 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of property and equipment | | | (18 | ) | | | (24 | ) |
Collection of note receivable | | | 26 | | | | 65 | |
Net cash provided by investing activities | | | 8 | | | | 41 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | | — | | | | 11 | |
Payments on long-term debt | | | (12 | ) | | | (10 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | (12 | ) | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | (471 | ) | | | 777 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 11,629 | | | | 12,105 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 11,158 | | | $ | 12,882 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
AETRIUM INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year or any future period.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to such rules and regulations. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
In connection with the sale of our Dallas operations to WEB Technology, Inc. (WEB) in 2006, we received a promissory note from WEB that provided for installment payments through December 2008. In July 2008, at WEB’s request, the note was restructured to provide for installment payments through December 2010. The current portion of the note receivable balance is included in the caption “Other current assets” and the long-term portion is included in the caption “Other assets” in our consolidated balance sheet as follows (in thousands):
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | |
Current portion - included in “Other current assets” | | $ | 107 | | | $ | 106 | |
Long-term portion - included in “Other assets” | | | 110 | | | | 137 | |
Total note receivable | | $ | 217 | | | $ | 243 | |
3. | SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION |
We account for share-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS 123R), which requires the measurement and recognition of all share-based compensation under the fair value method. We determine the fair value of share-based awards on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. We also use the Black-Scholes model to determine the fair value of modifications to awards by determining and comparing the fair value of the modified award with the fair value of the award immediately before the modification.
In February 2009, pursuant to our 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, we granted a stock option to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.265 per share, the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. The option vests in monthly increments over four years and will expire five years after the grant date. Using the Black-Scholes valuation model, the fair value of the option granted was determined to be $.46 per share. Assumptions used in applying the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of the option granted were as follows:
Expected stock price volatility | | | 48 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 1.2 | % |
Expected dividend level | | | 0 | % |
Expected life of options (years) | | | 3.5 | |
Also in February 2009, we modified the terms of vested options held by a former Aetrium director who retired in December 2008. The options were to expire ninety days following his retirement date. The options, which were “under water” on the modification date, were modified to extend the expiration dates to their respective original contract terms. The total fair value of the modifications, as determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model, was less than $1,000.
Share-based compensation expense included in our consolidated statements of operations was as follows (in thousands):
| | Three months ended March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | |
Cost of goods sold | | $ | 19 | | | $ | 14 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 93 | | | | 78 | |
Research and development | | | 26 | | | | 17 | |
Total share-based compensation expense | | $ | 138 | | | $ | 109 | |
As of March 31, 2009, we had approximately $1.1 million of unrecognized pretax share-based compensation expense, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.2 years.
4. | INCOME PER COMMON SHARE |
Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding during each period. Common equivalent shares include stock options using the treasury stock method. For loss periods, the computation of diluted loss per share excludes the impact of stock options because they would be antidilutive and diluted loss per share is therefore the same as basic loss per share. A reconciliation of the number of shares used in the computations of basic and diluted income (loss) per share follows (in thousands):
| | Three months ended March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | | | 10,598 | | | | 10,554 | |
Potentially dilutive stock options | | | — | | | | 275 | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding, assuming dilution | | | 10,598 | | | | 10,829 | |
For the three month period ended March 31, 2009, all stock options were excluded from the diluted computation because they would be antidilutive. For the three month period ended March 31, 2008, options to purchase 50,000 shares were excluded from the diluted computation because their exercise prices exceeded the average market value of our common stock and they would therefore have been antidilutive to income per share. As of March 31, 2009, there were 1,843,021 outstanding stock options that could have potentially impacted diluted income per share.
5. | RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS |
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 161). This statement is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 became effective for Aetrium at the beginning of fiscal year 2009 and had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (SFAS 160). This statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 became effective for Aetrium at the beginning of fiscal year 2009 and had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141(Revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures in its financial statements the fair value of identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date. SFAS 141R determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141R became effective for Aetrium at the beginning of fiscal year 2009 and had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | |
Purchased parts and completed subassemblies | | $ | 5,742 | | | $ | 5,978 | |
Work-in-process | | | 322 | | | | 456 | |
Finished goods, including saleable demonstration equipment | | | 2,383 | | | | 2,686 | |
Equipment shipped, subject to revenue deferral | | | 147 | | | | 42 | |
Total inventories | | $ | 8,594 | | | $ | 9,162 | |
7. | OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES |
Other accrued liabilities are comprised of the following (in thousands):
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | |
Accrued commissions | | $ | 65 | | | $ | 75 | |
Accrued warranty and no-charge equipment improvements | | | 154 | | | | 129 | |
Customer deposits and deferred revenue | | | 11 | | | | 61 | |
Accrued severance and other related costs | | | 21 | | | | 102 | |
Other | | | 266 | | | | 266 | |
Total other accrued liabilities | | $ | 517 | | | $ | 633 | |
Changes in accrued warranty and no-charge equipment improvements are summarized below (in thousands):
| | Three months ended March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | |
Accrual balance, beginning of period | | $ | 129 | | | $ | 276 | |
Accruals for warranties and no-charge equipment improvements | | | 39 | | | | 117 | |
Settlements made | | | (14 | ) | | | (221 | ) |
Accrual balance, end of period | | $ | 154 | | | $ | 172 | |
Aetrium has a revolving credit line agreement with a bank that provides for borrowings up to $2.0 million and bears interest at the prime rate less 0.25% with a minimum interest rate of 4.5%. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there were no borrowings under the line of credit agreement. The agreement expires in October 2009. As of March 31, 2009, we were not in compliance with a net income covenant under the agreement. We are currently in discussions with the bank regarding possible modifications to the agreement and we may explore other alternatives for similar financing. However, there can be no assurance that such financing will be available with terms favorable to us or at all.
9. | VACATED FACILITY AND RELATED LEASE OBLIGATION |
In 2000, we vacated a leased facility in Poway, California. The lease expires in January 2010. The facility is subleased to two independent parties with the sublease terms running concurrently with our remaining lease term. We believe future sublease income will cover our remaining lease obligations, which totaled approximately $0.5 million at March 31, 2009. As of April 2009, one of the subtenants was in default under its sublease agreement with us for failure to pay the past four months’ rent totaling approximately $134,000. This subtenant has indicated that it recently received a substantial long-term contract, is in the process of obtaining additional financing to support delivery under the contract, and expects to cure the default by June 2009. If this subtenant remains in default and/or the other subtenant was to default on its sublease agreement, we may have to record charges related to our future obligations under the lease.
The following table summarizes activity under our stock incentive plan for the three months ended March 31, 2009:
| | Number of Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contract Term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) | |
Outstanding, January 1, 2009 | | | 1,818,144 | | | $ | 3.65 | | | | | |
Granted | | | 30,000 | | | | 1.27 | | | | | |
Expired | | | (5,123 | ) | | | 3.63 | | | | | |
Outstanding, March 31, 2009 | | | 1,843,021 | | | $ | 3.62 | | 2.7 years | | $ | 6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable, March 31, 2009 | | | 1,069,722 | | | $ | 3.72 | | 2.2 years | | $ | — | |
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value (the difference between Aetrium’s closing stock price on March 31, 2009 and the option exercise price) of all in-the-money stock options that would have been received by the option holders had they exercised their options on March 31, 2009. The total fair value of options vested during the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $138,000.
The following table summarizes information related to stock options outstanding at March 31, 2009, all of which are nonqualified options and expire five years after the grant date and of which 279,500 options were fully exercisable when granted, 100,000 options were initially scheduled to become exercisable over four years from date of grant and were subsequently modified in the second quarter of 2005 to become fully exercisable to the extent not then exercisable, and 1,463,521 options become exercisable over four years from date of grant:
| | | Options Outstanding | | | Options Exercisable | |
Range of Exercise Prices | | | Number Outstanding | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Number Exercisable | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
$ | 1.27 to $ 3.13 | | | | 861,730 | | 2.9 years | | $ | 3.02 | | | | 476,785 | | | $ | 3.09 | |
3.87 to 4.81 | | | | 981,291 | | 2.5 years | | | 4.14 | | | | 592,937 | | | | 4.22 | |
$ | 1.27 to $ 4.81 | | | | 1,843,021 | | 2.7 years | | $ | 3.62 | | | | 1,069,722 | | | $ | 3.72 | |
We recorded an income tax benefit of $397,000 and income tax expense of $155,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The effective tax rates of approximately 35% and 37% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are based on the estimated annual effective tax rate for the entire year and reflect primarily the federal statutory rate of 34% plus estimated net state income taxes. The tax rate used in future periods may change based on our estimates of future pretax income or loss and other factors.
We record the benefit we will derive in future accounting periods from tax losses and credits and deductible temporary differences as “deferred tax assets,” which are included in the caption “Deferred income taxes” on our consolidated balance sheet. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (SFAS 109), we record a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of our deferred tax assets if, based on all available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Prior to fiscal year 2007, we had provided a valuation allowance to fully reserve these assets. At December 31, 2007, we reduced the valuation allowance from approximately $25.6 million to $21.7 million based on our assessment of the realizability of our deferred tax assets at that date. Our recent operating results have been adversely impacted by the global economic crisis and semiconductor industry downturn that began in the second half of fiscal year 2008 and have continued into fiscal year 2009. We incurred an operating loss in the fourth quarter of 2008 and expect to be unprofitable through at least the first half of fiscal year 2009. Our assessment of the realizability of our deferred tax assets at March 31, 2009 considered our future profit potential and other relevant factors, including our positive cumulative profit over the prior three years. Based on this assessment, we determined that there was not sufficient negative evidence to warrant an increase in the amount of the valuation allowance at March 31, 2009. We will continue to assess the assumptions used to determine the amount of our valuation allowance in future periods. If we continue to incur losses during fiscal year 2009 and our operations and future outlook show no signs of improvement, we may have to increase the valuation allowance, which could have a material impact on our results of operations in the period in which it is adjusted.
Deferred tax assets, net of a $21.7 million valuation allowance, are classified in our consolidated balance sheet as follows (in thousands):
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | |
Current assets | | $ | 127 | | | $ | 127 | |
Noncurrent assets | | | 2,887 | | | | 2,489 | |
Total | | $ | 3,014 | | | $ | 2,616 | |
AETRIUM INCORPORATED
Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
Aetrium designs, manufactures and markets a variety of electromechanical equipment used in the handling and testing of integrated circuits, or ICs, which constitute the highest revenue component of the semiconductor industry. Our primary focus is on high volume ICs and on the latest IC package designs. Our test handler products are purchased primarily by semiconductor manufacturers and their assembly and test subcontractors and are used in the test, assembly and packaging, or TAP, segment of semiconductor manufacturing. Our reliability test products are used to validate IC designs and monitor semiconductor wafer fabrication processes. Our products automate critical functions to improve manufacturing yield, raise quality levels, increase product reliability and reduce manufacturing costs.
As an equipment supplier to the semiconductor industry, Aetrium’s results are driven primarily by worldwide demand for ICs, which in turn depends on end-user demand for electronic products. The demand for our products can fluctuate significantly from period to period due to the direct or indirect impact of numerous factors, including but not limited to changes in the supply and demand for ICs, changes in IC manufacturing capacity, advancements in industry technologies, changes in U.S. and worldwide economic conditions and competitive factors.
Business conditions in the TAP segment of the semiconductor equipment industry were generally weak in the first half of 2008 and deteriorated significantly in the second half of the year as the current global economic crisis evolved. As the end of the year approached, many IC manufacturers, including Aetrium’s primary customers, made significant adjustments to their operations and reduced their capital expenditure plans in anticipation of significantly declining demand for ICs. In fourth quarter 2008, as it became clear that general economic and semiconductor industry business conditions may be weak for an extended period of time, we immediately took steps to reduce our expenses accordingly. We eliminated contract workers, terminated twelve employees, or 15% of our regular workforce, and reduced other operating expenses as well. In January 2009 we implemented wage reductions of 10% for all employees and up to 25% for our executive officers.
As expected, general economic weakness and the semiconductor equipment industry slowdown continued into fiscal year 2009 and Aetrium’s operating results have been affected accordingly. In the first quarter of 2009 our net sales were $1.8 million, compared with $2.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 and $5.6 million in the first quarter of 2008. We expect general economic and Aetrium business conditions to be challenging through the remainder of fiscal year 2009. Any prolonged continuation or worsening of the industry slowdown will likely adversely impact our longer term operating results as well.
Critical Accounting Policies
Aetrium’s critical accounting policies are discussed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Results of Operations
Net Sales. Total net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were $1.8 million compared with $5.6 million for the same period in 2008, a 69% decrease. Net sales decreased across all our product lines as general weakness in the semiconductor equipment industry in the first half of 2008 evolved into a severe downturn as worldwide economic conditions deteriorated through the end of the year and into 2009. Sales of test handlers were $1.2 million in the first three months of 2009 compared with $4.1 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of 71%. Sales of reliability test equipment were $0.3 million compared with $0.5 million in the same period in 2008, a decrease of 44%. Sales of change kits and spare parts were $0.3 million in the first three months of 2009 compared with $1.1 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of 71%.
Gross Profit. Aetrium’s gross profit as a percentage of net sales can fluctuate based on a number of factors, including but not limited to the mix of products sold, distribution channel mix, price discounting, product maturity, inventory writedowns, and utilization of manufacturing capacity associated with varying production levels. Gross profit was 28.6% of net sales in the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared with 49.3% for the same period in 2008. Our gross margin decreased in 2009 primarily due to inefficiencies associated with significantly lower production and net sales levels.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, expenses consist primarily of employee compensation and related costs, independent representative commissions, travel, warranty and no-charge equipment improvement costs. SG&A expenses were $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared with $1.7 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of 29%. Compensation costs decreased $0.3 million in 2009 due to a workforce reduction implemented in December 2008, wage reductions for all employees implemented in January 2009 and the elimination of all profit-related incentives. Travel expenses and warranty/no-charge equipment improvement costs each decreased $0.1 million in 2009 due primarily to reduced sales and service activities.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses were $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared with $0.8 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of 39%. Compensation costs decreased $0.1 million in 2009 due to a workforce reduction implemented in December 2008, wage reductions for all employees implemented in January 2009 and the elimination of all profit-related incentives. Contract services decreased $0.2 million as such costs were reduced in response to lower sales levels. Research and development expenses represented 27.1% of total net sales for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 compared with 13.8% of total net sales for the comparable period in 2008. New product development is an essential part of our strategy to gain market share. Over time, we expect to invest approximately 12% to 15% of our revenues in research and development although we may exceed this range in periods of reduced revenues as was the case in the first three months of 2009.
Interest Income, net. Interest income, net, amounted to $38,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared with $120,000 for the same period in 2008. Interest income was lower in 2009 due to lower average invested cash balances and lower interest rates.
Income Taxes. We recorded an income tax benefit of $397,000 and income tax expense of $155,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The effective tax rates of approximately 35% and 37% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are based on the estimated annual effective tax rate for the entire year and reflect primarily the federal statutory rate of 34% plus estimated net state income taxes. The tax rate used in future periods may change based on our estimates of future pretax income or loss and other factors.
We record the benefit we will derive in future accounting periods from tax losses and credits and deductible temporary differences as “deferred tax assets,” which are included in the caption “Deferred income taxes” on our consolidated balance sheet. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (SFAS 109), we record a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of our deferred tax assets if, based on all available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Prior to fiscal year 2007, we had provided a valuation allowance to fully reserve these assets. At December 31, 2007, we reduced the valuation allowance from approximately $25.6 million to $21.7 million based on our assessment of the realizability of our deferred tax assets at that date. Our recent operating results have been adversely impacted by the global economic crisis and semiconductor industry downturn that began in the second half of fiscal year 2008 and have continued into fiscal year 2009. We incurred an operating loss in the fourth quarter of 2008 and expect to be unprofitable through at least the first half of fiscal year 2009. Our assessment of the realizability of our deferred tax assets at March 31, 2009 considered our future profit potential and other relevant factors, including our positive cumulative profit over the prior three years. Based on this assessment, we determined that there was not sufficient negative evidence to warrant an increase in the amount of the valuation allowance at March 31, 2009. We will continue to assess the assumptions used to determine the amount of our valuation allowance in future periods. If we continue to incur losses during fiscal year 2009 and our operations and future outlook show no signs of improvement, we may have to increase the valuation allowance, which could have a material impact on our results of operations in the period in which it is adjusted.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents decreased by approximately $0.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009. We used $0.5 million in cash to fund operating activities during this period. The major components of cash flows from operating activities were our net loss of $0.7 million, a $0.4 million increase in deferred income taxes, a $0.3 million decrease in accounts payable, and a $0.1 million decrease in accrued severance costs, partially offset by $0.1 million in non-cash depreciation and share-based compensation expense, a $0.3 million decrease in accounts receivable, and a $0.6 million decrease in inventories. Inventories and accounts payable decreased primarily due to significantly reduced inventory purchases in the first quarter of 2009 compared with the fourth quarter of 2008 in response to lower sales levels. The decrease in accrued severance costs reflects the payment of benefits associated with a workforce reduction we implemented in December 2008. Accounts receivable decreased primarily due to a significant decrease in net sales in the first quarter of 2009 compared with the fourth quarter of 2008. Net cash provided by investing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2009 was not significant. Net cash used in financing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2009 was not significant.
Cash and cash equivalents increased by approximately $0.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2008. We generated $0.7 million in cash from operating activities during this period. The major components of cash flows from operating activities were net income of $0.3 million, $0.1 million in non-cash depreciation and share-based compensation expense, a $0.2 million decrease in deferred income taxes, and a $0.9 million decrease in accounts receivable, partially offset by a $0.4 million increase in inventories, a $0.2 million decrease in deferred revenue and a $0.1 million decrease in accrued warranty and no-charge equipment improvements. Accounts receivable decreased primarily due to a significant decrease in net sales in the first quarter of 2008 compared with the fourth quarter of 2007. Inventories increased primarily due to lower net sales than anticipated. Deferred revenue decreased as revenue recognition criteria were satisfied for items that had been deferred at December 31, 2007. Accrued warranty and no-charge equipment improvements decreased due to lower net sales and the shipment of certain items accrued in prior periods. Net cash provided by investing and financing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2008 was not significant.
Historically we have supported our capital expenditure and working capital needs with cash generated from operations and our existing cash and cash equivalents. We believe our cash and cash equivalents of $11.2 million at March 31, 2009 will be sufficient to meet capital expenditure and working capital needs for at least the next twelve months. We have a revolving credit line agreement with a bank that provides for borrowings up to $2.0 million. However, as of March 31, 2009, we were not in compliance with a net income covenant under the agreement. We are currently in discussions with the bank regarding possible modifications to the agreement and we may explore other alternatives for similar financing. However, there can be no assurance that such financing will be available with terms favorable to us or at all.
As discussed above, worldwide economic conditions are very weak and it is not known how long the current downturn in the semiconductor industry may last. A worsening or prolonged continuation of the current slowdown in our industry would likely adversely impact the demand for and prices of our products and adversely affect future cash flows. Also, we may acquire other companies, product lines or technologies that are complementary to our business, and our working capital needs may change as a result of such acquisitions.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 161). This statement is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 became effective for Aetrium at the beginning of fiscal year 2009 and had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (SFAS 160). This statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 became effective for Aetrium at the beginning of fiscal year 2009 and had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141(Revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures in its financial statements the fair value of identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date. SFAS 141R determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141R became effective for Aetrium at the beginning of fiscal year 2009 and had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 4T. | Controls and Procedures |
Our President and Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Administrative Officer and our Treasurer conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of March 31, 2009. Based on their evaluation, they concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and designed to give reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act was made known to them by others and was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. There was no change in our internal controls that occurred during the
period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
AETRIUM INCORPORATED
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
| |
| None. |
| |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
| |
| There have not been any material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. |
| |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
| |
| None. |
| |
Item 3. | Defaults on Senior Securities |
| |
| None. |
| |
Item 4. | Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
| |
| None. |
| |
Item 5. | Other Information |
| |
| None. |
| |
Item 6. | Exhibits |
| 31.1 Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| 31.2 Certification by Chief Administrative Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| 31.3 Certification by Treasurer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| 32.1 Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
AETRIUM INCORPORATED
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AETRIUM INCORPORATED |
(Registrant) |
Date: May 6, 2009 | By: | /s/ Joseph C. Levesque |
| | Joseph C. Levesque |
| | Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
Date: May 6, 2009 | By: | /s/ Paul H. Askegaard |
| | Paul H. Askegaard |
| | Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer) |