UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
[ ]
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
[X]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
OR
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________________ to ________________
Commission file number 1-12570
CE FRANKLIN LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
ALBERTA, CANADA
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Suite 1900
300 - 5th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 3C4
(Address of principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common shares, no par value
American Stock Exchange
Common shares, no par value
Toronto Stock Exchange
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act. None.
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act. None.
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common shares as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
As of December 31, 2003, there were 17,178,696shares of common shares outstanding.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X]
No [ ]
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 [ ]
Item 18 [X]
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes [ ]
No [ ]
1 of 55
Content | Page |
PART I | | |
| | | | |
| Item 1: | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors | | 4 |
| | | | |
| Item 2: | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable | | 4 |
| | | | |
| Item 3: | Key Information | | 4 |
| | A. Selected financial data | | 4 |
| | B. Capitalization and indebtedness | | 5 |
| | C. Reason for the offer and use of proceeds | | 5 |
| | D. Risk factors | | 5 |
| | | | |
| Item 4: | Information on the Company | | 7 |
| | A. History and development of the company | | 7 |
| | B. Business Overview | | 8 |
| | C. Organizational structure | | 10 |
| | D. Property, plant and equipment | | 10 |
| | | | |
| Item 5: | Operating and Financial Review and Prospects | | 11 |
| | A. Results of operations | | 11 |
| | B. Liquidity and capital resources | | 17 |
| | C. Research and development, patent and licenses, etc. | | 20 |
| | D. Trend information | | 20 |
| | E. Off-balance sheet arrangements | | 20 |
| | F. Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations | | 20 |
| | G. Safe harbor | | 20 |
| | | | |
| Item 6: | Directors, Senior Management and Employees | | 21 |
| | A. Directors and senior management | | 21 |
| | B. Compensation | | 23 |
| | C. Board practices | | 25 |
| | D. Employees | | 25 |
| | E. Share ownership | | 26 |
| | | | |
| Item 7: | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions | | 26 |
| | A. Major shareholders | | 26 |
| | B. Related party transactions | | 27 |
| | C. Interests of experts and counsel | | 27 |
| | | | |
| Item 8: | Financial Information | | 27 |
| | A. Consolidated statements and other financial information | | 27 |
| | B. Significant changes | | 27 |
2 of 55
Content | Page |
PART I (cont') | | |
| | | | |
| Item 9: | The Offer and Listing | | 28 |
| | A. Offer and listing details | | 28 |
| | B. Plan of distribution | | 28 |
| | C. Markets | | 28 |
| | D. Selling shareholders | | 28 |
| | E. Dilution | | 28 |
| | F. Expenses of the issue | | 28 |
| | | | |
| Item 10: | Additional Information | | 29 |
| | A. Share capital | | 29 |
| | B. Memorandum and articles of association | | 29 |
| | C. Material contracts | | 30 |
| | D. Exchange controls | | 30 |
| | E. Taxation | | 31 |
| | F. Dividends and paying agents | | 31 |
| | G. Statements by experts | | 31 |
| | H. Documents on display | | 31 |
| | I. Subsidiary information | | 31 |
| | | | |
| Item 11: | Quanititive and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | | 31 |
| | | | |
| Item 12: | Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities | | 32 |
| | | | |
PART II | | | | |
| | | | |
| Item 13: | Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies | | 32 |
| | | | |
| Item 14: | Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds | | 32 |
| | | | |
| Item 15: | Controls and Procedures | | 32 |
| | | | |
| Item 16: | Reserved | | 32 |
| | | | |
| Item 16A: | Audit Committee Financial Expert | | 32 |
| | | | |
| Item 16B: | Code of Ethics | | 32 |
| | | | |
| Item 16C: | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | | 33 |
| | | | |
| Item 16D: | Exemptions from Listing Standards for Audit Committees | | 33 |
| | | | |
| Item 16E: | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchases | | 33 |
| | | | |
PART III | | | | |
| | | | |
| Item 17: | Financial Statements | | 33 |
| | | | |
| Item 18: | Financial Statements | | 33 |
| | | | |
| Item 19: | Exhibits | | 49 |
3 of 55
PART I
Item 1:
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors
Not applicable.
Item 2:
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
Item 3:
Key Information
A.
Selected financial data
The selected financial data presented below for the five years ended December 31, 2003 is derived from CE Franklin Ltd. (“CE Franklin” or the “Company”) financial statements that were examined by the Company's independent auditors. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements of CE Franklin (including notes thereto) included under Item 18 and "Operating and Financial Review and Prospects" included under Item 5. The selected financial data presented below is presented in Canadian dollars and in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles or “Canadian GAAP”.
As at and for the Year Ended December 31 |
CANADIAN GAAP | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 |
| (in millions of Cdn. dollars except percentages, shares and per share data) |
Statements of Operations: | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | 259.6 | | 261.3 | | 377.8 | | 359.4 | | 237.1 |
Gross Profit | 43.6 | | 36.7 | | 43.8 | | 42.7 | | 27.4 |
% of sales | 16.8 | | 14.0 | | 11.6 | | 11.9 | | 11.5 |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | 0.4 | | (2.5) | | (1.6) | | 0.2 | | (5.5) |
Income from discontinued operations | - | | - | | 2.2 | | 1.3 | | 0.1 |
Net Income (loss) | 0.4 | | (2.5) | | 0.6 | | 1.5 | | (5.4) |
% of Sales | 0.2 | | (1.0) | | 0.2 | | 0.4 | | (2.3) |
Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | 0.02 | | (0.15) | | (0.09) | | 0.01 | | (0.33) |
Net income (loss) per share | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | 0.02 | | (0.15) | | 0.04 | | 0.09 | | (0.33) |
Diluted | 0.02 | | (0.15) | | 0.04 | | 0.08 | | (0.33) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Balance sheets: | | | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | 117.6 | | 99.5 | | 112.9 | | 166.2 | | 138.1 |
Capital Stock | 19.3 | | 19.3 | | 19.2 | | 19.1 | | 17.7 |
Shareholders' Equity | 47.6 | | 47.2 | | 50.0 | | 49.3 | | 46.4 |
Number of Shares Outstanding | 17,178,696 | | 17,178,696 | | 17,158,091 | | 17,149,153 | | 16,725,961 |
Dividends Declared | nil | | nil | | nil | | nil | | nil |
Net income (loss), shareholders' equity, and other balance sheet amounts as determined in accordance with Canadian GAAP differ from those determined in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), due principally to the recording of certain restructuring expenditures as goodwill, the realization of certain deferred tax benefits, the change in tax rates and the transitional provision in 2002 with respect to impairment of goodwill. Under US GAAP, the restructuring expenditures, the change in tax rates and the transitional provision with respect to goodwill would have been recorded in the statement of operations and the benefit of the deferred tax assets would have been recorded as a reduction of goodwill. See Note 16 to the December 31, 2003 Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 18.
4 of 55
AMOUNTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH US GAAP |
| As at and for the Year Ended December 31 |
| 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 |
| (in millions of Cdn. dollars except per share data) |
Net Income (loss) | 0.4 | | (2.9) | | 1.3 | | 0.9 | | (5.4) |
Net Income (loss) Per Share | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | 0.02 | | (0.17) | | (0.05) | | (0.03) | | (0.32) |
Net income (loss) | 0.02 | | (0.17) | | 0.08 | | 0.05 | | (0.32) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | 0.02 | | (0.17) | | (0.05) | | (0.03) | | (0.32) |
Net income (loss) | 0.02 | | (0.17) | | 0.08 | | 0.05 | | (0.32) |
Total Assets | 116.3 | | 98.2 | | 111.5 | | 164.7 | | 136.6 |
Shareholders' Equity | 46.2 | | 45.8 | | 48.6 | | 47.2 | | 44.9 |
All dollar amounts set forth in the Annual Report on Form 20-F are in Canadian dollars, except where otherwise indicated. The following tables set forth (i) the closing exchange rate at the end of the period, the average exchange rate during the period based on the closing exchange rate on the last day of each month and the high and low closing exchange rates based on the closing exchange rate on the last day of each month. (ii) The closing exchange rate at the end of each period, the average exchange rate during the period and the high and low exchange rates based on the closing exchange rate for each day during the month. (iii) The closing exchange rate for the day. The rates used are based on Bank of Canada foreign exchange rates.
(i) | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 |
Rate at end of period | | 0.7713 | | 0.6339 | | 0.6278 | | 0.6669 | | 0.6929 |
Average rate during period | | 0.7195 | | 0.6376 | | 0.6448 | | 0.6736 | | 0.6752 |
High | | 0.7713 | | 0.6595 | | 0.6672 | | 0.6918 | | 0.6929 |
Low | | 0.6572 | | 0.6242 | | 0.6278 | | 0.6510 | | 0.6618 |
(ii) | | 2004 | | 2003 |
| | February | | January | | December | | November | | October | | September | |
Rate at end of period | | 0.7487 | | 0.7548 | | 0.7713 | | 0.7698 | | 0.7584 | | 0.7408 | |
Average rate during period | | 0.7525 | | 0.7712 | | 0.7619 | | 0.7620 | | 0.7560 | | 0.7337 | |
High | | 0.7631 | | 0.7867 | | 0.7726 | | 0.7698 | | 0.7669 | | 0.7424 | |
Low | | 0.7450 | | 0.7519 | | 0.7478 | | 0.7471 | | 0.7434 | | 0.7185 | |
(iii)
On March 17, 2004, the closing rate in Canadian dollars was US $0.7471 = Cdn. $1.00.
B.
Capitalization and indebtedness
Not applicable.
C.
Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds
Not applicable.
D.
Risk factors
CE Franklin has made in this Form 20-F, and may from time to time otherwise make in other public filings, press releases and discussions with management, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements include statements, among others, about CE Franklin's operations, performance and financial results and conditions, as described in more detail in Item 5 of this Form 20-F,
5 of 55
under the heading “Forward-Looking Statements.” Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Some of these risks and uncertainties are detailed below and elsewhere in this Form 20-F and in CE Franklin's other public filings, press releases and discussions with CE Franklin's management. CE Franklin undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, except as required by law.
In addition to the information set forth elsewhere in this Form 20-F, the following factors should be carefully considered when evaluating CE Franklin.
Fluctuations in oil and gas prices could affect the demand for CE Franklin's products and services and, therefore, CE Franklin's revenues, cash flows and profitability. CE Franklin's operations are materially dependent upon the level of activity in oil and gas exploration and production. Both short-term and long-term trends in oil and gas prices affect the level of such activity. Oil and gas prices and, therefore, the level of drilling, exploration and production activity can be volatile. Factors that can cause price fluctuations include:
relatively minor changes in the worldwide supply of and demand for oil and natural gas;
the ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) to maintain price stability through voluntary production limits;
the level of production by non-OPEC countries;
North American demand for gas;
general economic and political conditions; and
the presence or absence of drilling incentives such as Canadian provincial royalty holidays, fluctuation in the value of the Canadian dollar, availability of new leases and concessions and government regulations regarding, among other things, export controls, environmental protection, taxation, price controls and product allocation.
Worldwide military, political and economic events, including initiatives by OPEC, affect both the demand for, and the supply of, oil and gas. Fluctuations during the last few years in the demand and supply of oil and gas have contributed to, and are likely to continue to contribute to, price volatility. CE Franklin believes that any prolonged reduction in oil and gas prices would depress the level of exploration and production activity. This would likely result in a corresponding decline in the demand for CE Franklin's products and services and could have a material adverse effect on CE Franklin's revenues, cash flows and profitability. There can be no assurances as to the future level of demand for CE Franklin's products and services or future conditions in the oil and gas and oilfield supply industries.
Adverse weather conditions could temporarily decrease the demand for CE Franklin's products and services. CE Franklin's financial performance is tied closely to the seasonality of drilling activity. Higher drilling activity in Canada is generally experienced in the winter months. In the spring and early summer, drilling activity slows due to the difficulty in moving equipment during the spring thaws. To the extent that unseasonable weather conditions such as excessive rain or unusually warm winters affect the ability of CE Franklin's customers to access their oil and gas wells, then the demand for CE Franklin's products and services would temporarily decrease and the Company's revenues, cash flows and profitability would be adversely affected.
CE Franklin operates in a highly competitive industry, which may adversely affect CE Franklin's revenues, cash flows and profitability. The Canadian oilfield supply industry in which CE Franklin operates is very competitive. The Company believes that its future profitability is partially influenced by competitive factors beyond its control, including:
the ability of some customers to purchase oilfield supplies and tubular products directly from the manufacturer rather than from independent oilfield supply distributors and brokers;
the ability for new brokers and distributors to enter the Distribution business if the oil and gas industry were to experience significant growth in drilling activity; and
price competition among major supply companies; and
6 of 55
CE Franklin and its largest competitors generally operate at low profit margins due to price competition. Price competition is due in part to consumer price pressure, in addition to the major supply companies competing for the same business.
The loss of CE Franklin's major supplier for its tubular products could adversely affect the Company's revenue and gross profit. A portion of CE Franklin's business is the sale of tubular products that are primarily obtained from one supplier. Although the Company believes that it has historically had and continues to have a good relationship with its supplier, there can be no assurance that such relationship will continue. In the event the Company is unable to source tubular products from its existing supplier, then CE Franklin would need to search for an alternate supplier of these goods. Such suppliers are available domestically and internationally.
Item 4:
Information on the Company
Overview
CE Franklin has two identifiable industry segments, which are the distribution of general oilfield supplies including pipe, valves, fittings, production equipment and tubular goods to producers of oil and gas in Canada (“Distribution”), and manufacturing for rent or sale of small horsepower gas compression equipment for the producers of oil and gas in Canada (“Manufacturing”). The Company's main focus is to leverage on long-term relationships with many leading manufacturers who depend on CE Franklin to get their products efficiently into the hands of hundreds of engineering, drilling, production and well servicing companies throughout Canada's oil and gas producing regions.
A.
History and development of the Company
In November 1993, Franklin Supply Company Ltd., a Canadian company (“Franklin”) completed its initial public offering and its shares were listed on the American Stock Exchange and now trade under the symbol “CFK”.
CE Franklin is the result of the combination by reverse takeover of Franklin and Continental Emsco Company Limited (“CEL”) on November 3, 1995. On January 1, 1996, Franklin Supply and its wholly owned subsidiary CEL amalgamated, resulting in CE Franklin. On September 26, 1996, the common shares of CE Franklin began trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “CFT”.
On January 1, 1998, Brittania Compression Sales Ltd., Domino Machine Ltd. and Northstar Industrial Ltd. were amalgamated into a new, wholly owned subsidiary, CEF Technologies Ltd. On January 1, 1998 BWM Supply and Service Ltd. was amalgamated with CE Franklin Ltd. As a result of these transactions, on January 1, 1998 CE Franklin had one wholly owned subsidiary, CEF Technologies Ltd.
On May 29, 1999, Smith International, Inc. (“Smith International”) acquired all the common shares previously held by Continental Emsco Company, which constituted 51.2% of the Company's outstanding common shares. As of March 17, 2004 Smith International owned 55.1% of common shares outstanding.
On February 1, 2002 CE Franklin amalgamated with its wholly owned subsidiary CEF Technologies Ltd.
On January 31, 2003 the Company transferred the property and equipment and operations of its compression operations into a wholly owned subsidiary, Brittania Industries Inc. (“Brittania”). Subsequently a 50% interest in the new subsidiary was sold for $538,000.
The Company is registered in the province of Alberta in the country of Canada. The principal address and telephone number is as follows:
CE Franklin Ltd.
Suite 1900
300 – 5th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta Canada
T2P 3C4
7 of 55
403-531-5600
Principal Capital Expenditures and Divestitures
On January 31, 2003 the Company transferred the property and equipment and operations of its compression operations into a wholly owned subsidiary, Brittania. Subsequently, a 50% interest in the new subsidiary was sold for $538,000. No gain or loss on disposition resulted.
On December 18, 2001 the Company sold its Domino Machine operations for net cash proceeds of $7,924,000 resulting in a net after tax gain of $1,102,000. Domino Machine provided custom machining services to the energy industry and was not considered a core operation to the Company. The net proceeds from this transaction were used to reduce the Company's outstanding bank operating loan.
CE Franklin did not acquire or divest any businesses from 2000 to 2003 other than those disclosed above.
The Company has discussed the possible acquisition of complementary businesses and competitors. The Company has not entered into any agreement with respect to any prospective acquisition. The Company intends to continue discussions and to make acquisitions in the future when they are deemed advantageous to the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to expand its Canadian operations by further acquisitions. In addition, if the Company makes acquisitions, there can be no assurance that such transactions will prove to be profitable for the Company.
B.
Business overview
General
CE Franklin has two identifiable industry segments, which are Distribution and Manufacturing. See note 12 “Segmented Information” to the December 31, 2003 Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 18.
Distribution
During 2003, the Company's Distribution segment generated sales of $257.2 million (2002 - $255.1 million; 2001 - $371.1 million). CE Franklin sells general oilfield supplies including pipe, valves and fittings and production equipment through its 37 branches, which are situated in western Canadian towns and smaller cities that have grown to serve particular oil and gas fields. In addition, CE Franklin targets major capital construction projects in oilsands, refining, heavy oil and petrochemical as well as non-oilfield related industries.
The Company also distributes tubular products in Canada, the steel pipe which is used to line oil and gas wells, and the tubing that is used to bring the production to the surface. It is also a major distributor of line pipe for oil and gas gathering systems. Tubular product sales are made from the Company's headquarters in downtown Calgary, where most of the Canadian oil and gas producers also have their headquarters. Deliveries of pipe are made directly from the field inventories of the manufacturers to the well site or the site where surface line pipe will be laid.
CE Franklin, from time to time, will open or close branches to meet customers' requirements and fluctuating market conditions. The branches not only act as the retail “one stop shop” for the oil and gas industry by providing over 25,000 regularly-stocked Stock Keeping Units (“SKU's”) of product, but they also provide the field with essential services to support the oil and gas producers. The branches provide materials management services to enable the customers to get the right products at the right time. Should the branch not have a particular product in stock, it has overnight access to the centralized distribution center in Edmonton, Alberta.
Other services provided by the branches include pump repair, customized pump designs and testing, convenient hours and locations plus 24-hour on call service. In addition, CE Franklin provides well optimization analysis and onsite project management.
CE Franklin manages its buying and distribution through a 100,000 square-foot centralized distribution center (the “Distribution Center”) located in Edmonton, Alberta. The Distribution Center is strategically located within reasonable proximity to a majority of vendors and acts as the hub for the branches. Its
8 of 55
location reduces freight costs through effective consolidation of shipments. It provides a cross-dock function that minimizes inventory levels and maximizes service through automatic stock replenishment. The Distribution Center is International Organization for Standardization 9001 - 2000 (“ISO”) certified which is required by a growing number of CE Franklin's customers in conformance with their own ISO programs.
For the supply chain to be effective, strong relationships must be cultivated between the Company and its customers. Several customers have looked to CE Franklin for its expertise in materials management and other service support. The formal arrangement between the Company and its customers is referred to as an “alliance” or an “enhanced business relationship”.
Through building alliances, the Company now manages over 50 warehousesfor its customers. The trend is for customers to focus on their core competencies and outsource non-core areas.
A significant portion of the tubular products sold by the Company are products manufactured by IPSCO Inc., which is a steel manufacturer with manufacturing facilities for tubular products in Regina, Calgary and Red Deer in Canada. The Company relies on IPSCO Inc. for the supply of tubular products that comprise a material portion of its revenues. The Company believes that it has historically had and continues to have a good relationship with IPSCO Inc. The Company will import tubular products from overseas manufacturers to supplement its inventory from IPSCO Inc.
Manufacturing
The Company's Manufacturing operation is comprised of Brittania. Brittania operates out of one service center, which manufactures, sells and rents small horsepower gas compressor packages. During 2003, Brittania generated sales of $2.4 million (0.9% of total Company sales) (2002 - $6.2 million; 2001 - $6.7 million).
Business and operating strategy
The Company's business and operating strategy includes improving the Company's value offering and service to its customers, increasing market share, maximizing gross profit margins through procurement practices, rationalizing expenses and improving earnings. CE Franklin has revised its value offering for its customer base and is leveraging its relationship with Wilson Supply in the United States, (a wholly owned division of Smith International, a 55.1% shareholder) to offer a North American solution to its customer base. Actions will continue in customer service excellence and operational effectiveness. CE Franklin will continue to attempt to grow its market share in its Distribution business. Inventory management and accounts receivable initiatives have significantly reduced the Company's debt in the past three years.
Operations
CE Franklin's operations are divided into: sales, which includes product, account management and inside sales; marketing and supply, which includes central purchasing; operations, which includes strategically located branches, the Distribution Center, and information technologies; customer service, safety and quality; finance and administration; and business effectiveness (human resources).
Product management includes the technical and sales personnel who specialize in providing sales and service for the Company's specialized product lines, such as bottom hole pumps and other production equipment, steel and fiberglass tubulars and valves. Product managers are responsible for the profitability of their product specialty, from the vendor through to the customer.
To ensure coordination and close contact with all of the Company's major customers, a group of salesmen, working out of Calgary, Alberta where customers head offices are located, act as account managers with specific individual responsibilities for managing the Company's business and alliance relationships with its customers. In addition, the field has regional area sales representatives that will coordinate sales and activities in the field. The inside sales group is responsible for coordination and preparation of hundreds of competitive bid packages each year for Canadian and international sales.
Individual branch managers are responsible for the branch in their district. The branch is the front line interface with the customer. The Distribution Center provides centralized materials management services for CE Franklin's branches and where practical will ship product directly to customers. The information technologies group is a fundamental component of providing service to customers and is responsible for
9 of 55
maintaining the Company's enterprise and eCommerce systems. The marketing and supply group is responsible for inventory procurement, pricing and margins. Customer service, safety and quality ensure processes and procedures are in place to deliver customer service.
Competition
The Canadian oilfield supply industry is highly competitive and fragmented. CE Franklin and its largest competitors generally operate at low profit margins due to price competition. Price competition is due to customer price pressure and to competition among the major supply companies for the same business. Costs of goods may not be subject to competitive pressures due to the ability of manufacturers of certain products, particularly tubular products, to hold the prices at which they sell their products. The Company believes that its future profitability is partially influenced by additional competitive factors beyond its control, including the ability of some customers to purchase products directly from the manufacturer rather than from independent oilfield supply distributors. In addition, if the oil and gas industry were to experience significant growth in drilling activity, new competitors could arise due to the low capital investment involved.
There are approximately 200 oilfield supply stores in Canada operated by seven substantial companies, and there are approximately 20 dealers in oilfield tubulars. However, only CE Franklin and one competitor offer a North-American solution. The oilfield supply market is part of the larger industrial supply market, which is also served in part by numerous other competitors. Some of CE Franklin's major competitors have manufacturing divisions or affiliates that produce some of their product lines. This vertical integration may place the Company at a cost disadvantage. The market is further fragmented by (i) companies that specialize in the sales of certain products, (ii) general industrial supply houses that overlap with the oilfield suppliers particularly in the area of pipe, valves and fittings, (iii) manufacturers who sell directly to the oil and gas industry and (iv) major oil companies that sometimes purchase dir ectly from manufacturers on large orders.
Smith International, which owns 55.1% of the Company as of March 17, 2004, and its affiliates, including Wilson Supply, have indicated that they will not compete with CE Franklin in Canada. CE Franklin has agreed not to compete with Smith International or Wilson Supply in the United States. However, there are no assurances that this will not change at a future date.
In many of the established oil and gas producing countries outside of North America, oilfield equipment and supplies are sold and supplied differently and accordingly, North American-style branches are not common. As a result of price competition in Canada, profit margins in the industry are typically not high and profitability is achieved by continuously improving the effectiveness of personnel and the efficiency of systems.
Adverse weather conditions could temporarily decrease the demand for CE Franklin's products and services. CE Franklin's financial performance is tied closely to the seasonality of drilling activity. Higher drilling activity in Canada is generally experienced in the winter months. In the spring and early summer, drilling activity slows due to the difficulty in moving equipment during the spring thaws. To the extent that unseasonable weather conditions such as excessive rain or unusually warm winters affect the ability of CE Franklin's customers to access their oil and gas wells, then the demand for CE Franklin's products and services would temporarily decrease and the Company's revenues, cash flows and profitability would be adversely affected.
C.
Organizational structure
On February 1, 2002, CE Franklin amalgamated with its wholly owned subsidiary, CEF Technologies Ltd. The Company operated as one legal entity, CE Franklin Ltd. from February 1, 2002 to January 31, 2003.
On January 31, 2003, the Company transferred the property and equipment and operations of its compression operations into a wholly owned subsidiary, Brittania. Subsequently, a 50% interest in the new subsidiary was sold for $538,000. Brittania is registered in the province of Alberta, Canada.
D.
Property, plant and equipment
Description of Property
The Company's headquarters is located in Calgary, Alberta and its Distribution Center is based in Edmonton, Alberta. The Company has 25 branches in Alberta, five in Saskatchewan, five in British
10 of 55
Columbia, one in Manitoba and one in Ontario. Brittania has one assembly facility in Alberta. The Company leases 34 branches, and owns three branches. The owned properties represent two branches in Alberta, and one branch in Saskatchewan. The owned properties are subject to a general security agreement in favor of the Company's principal lender.
The current capacity at the Company's branches and Distribution Center is considered adequate to meet current market demand.
The Company is not aware of any environmental issues that could have a material impact on any of its properties.
Property and equipment decreased 29.6% to $9.0 million as at December 31, 2003. This decrease reflects amortization expense of $4.4 million offset by capital expenditures of $601,000. As at December 31, 2003, approximately $5.7 million in property and equipment (original cost of $15.6 million) relates to the Company's investment in its enterprise and eCommerce systems. This accounts for $2.8 million in amortization expense for the year-ended December 31, 2003. These assets will be fully amortized by the end of 2005. The Company anticipates that its enterprise and eCommerce systems will operate beyond 2005 as long as the Company implements the standard upgrades as provided by the suppliers. These upgrades are considered inexpensive in relation to the Company's initial investment.
Item 5:
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
Management's Discussion and Analysis as of January 16, 2004
A.
Results of Operations
(All amounts shown in CDN dollars unless otherwise specified)
Selected Financial Information
The following “Management's Discussion and Analysis” is provided to assist readers in understanding CE Franklin's financial performance during the periods presented and significant trends that may impact future performance of the Company. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the related notes thereto included under Item 18.
The selected financial data presented below is presented in Canadian dollars and in accordance with Canadian GAAP. For a discussion of the principle differences between the Company's financial results as calculated under U.S. GAAP, see Note 16 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 18.
11 of 55
As at and for the Years-Ended December 31 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 |
| | (in thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data) |
| | | | | | |
Statements of Operations | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Sales | | | | | | |
Distribution | | 257,125 | | 255,128 | | 371,167 |
Manufacturing | | 2,432 | | 6,201 | | 6,678 |
| | 259,557 | | 261,329 | | 377,845 |
Gross Profit | | | | | | |
Distribution | | 43,550 | | 35,015 | | 41,985 |
Manufacturing | | 13 | | 1,691 | | 1,795 |
| | 43,563 | | 36,706 | | 43,780 |
Gross Profit - % | | | | | | |
Distribution | | 0.2% | | 0.1% | | 0.1% |
Manufacturing | | 0.0% | | 0.3% | | 0.3% |
| | 0.2% | | 0.1% | | 0.1% |
Other expenses (income) | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 37,360 | | 35,537 | | 39,696 |
Amortization | | 4,395 | | 4,245 | | 3,879 |
Other | | (772) | | (267) | | 247 |
| | 40,983 | | 39,515 | | 43,822 |
Income (loss) before interest and taxes | | | | | | |
Distribution | | 3,753 | | (2,233) | | 604 |
Manufacturing | | (1,173) | | (576) | | (646) |
| | 2,580 | | (2,809) | | (42) |
| | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | 1,463 | | (3,908) | | (2,073) |
Income tax expense (recovery) | | 1,042 | | (1,415) | | (520) |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | 421 | | (2,493) | | (1,553) |
Net income (loss) | | 421 | | (2,493) | | 619 |
| | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share - continuing operations | | | | |
Basic and diluted | | $0.02 | | $(0.15) | | $(0.09) |
| | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | | $0.02 | | $(0.15) | | $0.04 |
| | | | | | |
Balance Sheets | | | | | | |
Current assets | | 100,591 | | 79,012 | | 89,783 |
Total assets | | 117,632 | | 99,534 | | 112,929 |
Current liabilities | | 68,445 | | 49,683 | | 58,867 |
Long-term financial liabilities | | 146 | | 299 | | 614 |
Shareholders' equity | | 47,628 | | 47,171 | | 49,957 |
Effective January 31, 2003, the Company sold, for cash proceeds of $538,000, a 50% interest in the property and equipment and operations of Brittania. The Company accounts for its remaining 50% interest in Brittania using the proportionate consolidation method of accounting.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 18 should be read in order to understand factors such as the changes in the method of accounting for stock options and goodwill and other intangibles which were adopted during 2003 and 2002, and the effect of Discontinued Operations in 2001. These items may affect the comparability of the information shown above.
Overview
The level of exploration and production activity in the western Canadian sedimentary basin including the oilsands areas largely drives the performance of the Company's Distribution and Manufacturing segments in Canada. Drilling activity levels and capital project spending in the oilsands areas are primarily influenced by worldwide energy prices, but may also be affected by expectations related to the worldwide supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, finding and development costs, political uncertainties and environmental concerns (see Item 3D under the caption “Risks factors”for a detailed explanation of items which could have an effect on the Company's results from operations and cash flows).
12 of 55
Fiscal 2003 was a return to profitability for the Company following two years of losses from continuing operations. Net income from continuing operations for the year-ended December 31, 2003 was $421,000 or $0.02 per share (diluted) as compared to a loss of $2.5 million or $0.15 per share (diluted) in 2002, and a loss of $1.6 million or $0.09 per share (diluted) in 2001.
The improvement in earnings was due to an increase in activity levels and an improved value offering to the Company's customers, coupled with solid gross profit margin improvement and expense rationalization.
The Company's balance sheet remained strong in 2003. Total capitalization (financed debt plus equity) as at December 31, 2003 was comprised of debt of 33.4% in 2003 versus 31.9% in 2002 and equity of 66.6% in 2003 versus 68.1% in 2002.
Results of Operations – Comparison of 2003 to 2002
Commodity prices were strong in 2003. The price of oil and gas as at December 31, 2003 was U.S. $32.79 (West Texas Intermediate) and Cdn. $6.88 (AECO spot) respectively. This compares to U.S. $29.42 for oil and Cdn. $5.97 for gas as at December 31, 2002.
The strong commodity prices resulted in Exploration and Production (“E&P”) companies having increased cash flow, and therefore being able to increase their capital spending on exploration and production activities. The average active rig count increased 40.0% to 371 active rigs for the year-ended December 31, 2003 as compared to 265 active rigs for the year-ended December 31, 2002.
Sales
Sales for the year-ended December 31, 2003 decreased marginally to $259.6 million from $261.3 million for the year-ended December 31, 2002.
Sales for the Company's Distribution segment increased $2.0 million or 0.8% reflecting a 17.9% increase in branch sales as a result of an increase in activity levels during 2003. Sales of tubular products declined 33.9% due to two large customers having the tonnage capacity to be able to purchase their tubular products directly from the steel mills. As customer tonnage capacity increases, there is a risk that steel mills will sell tubular products to the customers directly.
Manufacturing sales decreased to $2.4 million for the year-ended December 31, 2003 from $6.2 million for the year-ended December 31, 2002 due to the 50% sale of Brittania and a refocusing of the operations to gas compression products from air and gas compression.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased 18.7% to $43.6 million for the year-ended December 31, 2003 from $36.7 million for the year-ended December 31, 2002. Gross profit margins increased to 16.8% for the year-ended December 31, 2003 from 14.0% for the year-ended December 31, 2002.
Distribution gross profit increased 24.4% or $8.5 million to $43.6 million for the year-ended December 31, 2003 while sales increased only 0.8%. This reflects an improvement in Distribution gross profit margins to 16.9% in 2003 from 13.7% in 2002.
Of the 3.2% improvement in Distribution gross profit margins, 2.0% reflects an improvement in gross profit margins as a result of business process efficiency by the Company in 2003. The remainder of the increase, 1.2%, reflects a shift in mix from lower margin tubular product sales to higher margin general product sales.
Manufacturing gross profit decreased to $13,000 for the year-ended December 31, 2003 from $1.7 million for the year-ended December 31, 2002. This reflects the lower sales in 2003 coupled with an inventory write-down of $654,000 as a result of the development of new product lines in 2003, making existing inventory obsolete.
13 of 55
Selling, General and Administrative Costs (SG&A)
SG&A costs increased $1.8 million or 5.1% to $37.4 million for the year-ended December 31, 2003 from $35.5 million for the year-ended December 31, 2002. Distribution SG&A increased $2.9 million or 8.6% in 2003. Approximately 95% of the SG&A relating to the Company's Distribution segment relates to the Company's branches; therefore the 8.6% increase in SG&A supports the 17.9% increase in branch sales for the year-ended December 31, 2003.
In addition, during 2003 the Company increased the variable component of its Distribution SG&A. Approximately 13.3% of the Distribution segments SG&A in 2003 was variable and will fluctuate with branch sales. This compares to 5.7% during 2002.
Manufacturing SG&A decreased $1.1 million or 53.1% during 2003 reflecting the sale of a 50% interest in Brittania coupled with a reduction in staffing to offset the declining gross profit.
Income (loss) before interest and taxes
Income (loss) before interest and taxes for the year-ended December 31, 2003 increased $5.4 million to $2.6 million during 2003 from a loss of $2.8 million for the year-ended December 31, 2002.
The Distribution segment's income increased $6.0 million to $3.8 million during 2003 from a loss of $2.2 million in 2002. This represents an incremental flow through of 300% on the $2.0 million sales increase due to the improvement in gross profit margins in 2003, offset by increased SG&A.
The Manufacturing segment's loss increased to a loss of $1.2 million for the year-ended December 31, 2003 from a loss of $576,000 for the year-ended December 31, 2002 due primarily to the inventory obsolescence write-down described above.
Income (loss) before Income Taxes
Income before income taxes improved $5.4 million to $1.5 million for the year-ended December 31, 2003 from a loss of $3.9 million for the year-ended December 31, 2002.
Income Taxes
The Company's effective tax rate for the year-ended December 31, 2003 was 71.2%, as compared to an effective tax rate of 36.2% for the year-ended December 31, 2002. The Company's combined federal and provincial tax rate for 2003 was 37.1% (2002 – 39.6%). The net income before tax was impacted by non-deductible items and capital and other taxes that became a larger component of the overall income tax charge in 2003. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 18.
Net Income (loss) and Earnings per Share
Net income for the year-ended December 31, 2003 was $421,000 or $0.02 per share (diluted) as compared to a net loss of $2.5 million or a loss per share of $0.15 per share (diluted) for the year-ended December 31, 2002. This represents an income improvement of $2.9 million or $0.17 per share (diluted).
Results of Operations – Comparison of 2002 to 2001
The average price of oil during 2002 was U.S. $26.10 (West Texas Intermediate) and the average price of gas was Cdn. $4.18 (AECO spot). Oil and gas commodity prices started 2002 with the price of oil at U.S. $19.51 and the price of gas at Cdn. $3.52, and as a result, many E&P companies reduced their capital spending programs for 2002. Although commodity prices improved significantly during the year with the price of oil and gas ending the year at U.S. $29.42 and Cdn. $5.97, respectively, this increase in oil and gas prices did not result in a revision in E&P companies capital spending programs for 2002. The average active rig count decreased 22.7% to 265 active rigs during 2002 compared to 343 active rigs during 2001.
Sales
Sales for the year-ended December 31, 2002 decreased $116.5 million or 30.8% to $261.3 million from $377.8 million for the year-ended December 31, 2001. The majority of the sales decline comes from the Company's Distribution segment.
14 of 55
Of this decline, $19.8 million relates to the completion of a large capital oilsands project in northern Alberta in 2001. The Company supplied pipe, flanges and fittings to this construction project. Excluding this capital project, sales decreased $96.7 million or 25.6% for the year-ended December 31, 2002.
Tubular product sales for the year-ended December 31, 2002 declined 47.9% as compared to the year-ended December 31, 2001 due to merger and acquisition activity during the last half of 2001, resulting in two customers now being able to directly access steel mills, and an overall decline in activity levels. Sales of the Company's other products through its branch network declined at the same rate as the decline in industry activity.
Gross Profit
Total gross profit decreased $7.1 million or 16.2% to $36.7 million in 2002 as compared to $43.8 million during 2001. Included in the 2001 gross profit of $43.8 million was a $1.7 million inventory write-down relating to the Distribution and Manufacturing segments. Excluding the inventory write-down, total gross profit decreased $8.8 million or 19.3% for the year-ended December 31, 2002 as compared to the year-ended December 31, 2001.
Average gross profit margin for the year-ended December 31, 2002 increased to 14.0% from 11.6% for the year-ended December 31, 2001, due to the inventory write-down described above coupled with the lower margin earned on the capital oilsands project, which was completed in 2001.
Selling, General and Administrative Costs
For the year-ended December 31, 2002, SG&A costs decreased $4.2 million or 10.5% to $35.5 million from $39.7 million. With the decline in activity levels during the last six months of 2001 and during 2002, the Company's Distribution segment adjusted its infrastructure to support the reduced sales levels.
CE Franklin reduced its employee base during 2001 and 2002 by 25.3% to 327 employees as at December 31, 2002 from 438 employees as at September 30, 2001 to offset the decline in activity levels. This accounts for the $4.2 million reduction in SG&A.
Loss before Interest and Income Taxes
Loss before interest and income taxes for the year-ended December 31, 2002 was $2.8 million as compared to a loss of $42,000 for the year-ended 2001. The $116.5 million decrease in sales resulted in only a 2.4% decremental flow through. This was due to an improvement in gross profit margins from 11.6% to 14.0%, and a reduction in SG&A by $4.2 million.
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes, and Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes was $3.9 million for the year-ended 2002 as compared to a loss of $2.1 million for the year-ended 2001. The $1.8 million decline in income reflects the $2.8 million increase in loss before interest and income taxes offset by a reduction in interest expense of $1.0 million. The reduction in interest expense reflects lower debt levels due to better working capital management by the Company and the sale of its Domino Machine operations at the end of 2001.
Loss from continuing operations was $2.5 million or a loss of $0.15 per share (diluted) for 2002 as compared to a loss of $1.6 million or $0.09 per share (diluted) for 2001.
Discontinued Operations – Year-Ended December 31, 2001
Income from discontinued operations in 2001 was $2.2 million. On December 18, 2001 the Company sold its Domino Machine operations for net cash proceeds of $7.9 million resulting in an after tax gain on disposition of $1.1 million. Domino Machine provided custom-machining services to the energy industry, which was not considered a core operation to the Company. The net proceeds from this transaction were used to reduce the Company's outstanding bank operating loan. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 18.
Net Income (Loss) and Earnings (Loss) per Share
Net loss for the year-ended 2002 was $2.5 million or $0.15 per share (diluted) as compared to net income of $619,000 or $0.04 per share (diluted) for 2001.
15 of 55
Summary of Quarterly Financial Data
The selected quarterly financial data presented below is presented in Canadian dollars and in accordance with Canadian GAAP. For a discussion of the principle differences between the Company's financial results as calculated under U.S. GAAP, see Note 16 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 18.
Unaudited | | Q1 | | Q2 | | Q3 | | Q4 | | 2003 |
| | (thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data) |
Sales | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution | | 61,798 | | 54,807 | | 67,533 | | 72,987 | | 257,125 |
Manufacturing | | 1,181 | | 494 | | 309 | | 448 | | 2,432 |
| | 62,979 | | 55,301 | | 67,842 | | 73,435 | | 259,557 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | (62) | | (476) | | 307 | | 652 | | 421 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | | $(0.00) | | $(0.03) | | $0.02 | | $0.03 | | $0.02 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Unaudited | | Q1 | | Q2 | | Q3 | | Q4 | | 2002 |
| | (thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data) |
Sales | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution | | 78,198 | | 56,103 | | 61,113 | | 59,714 | | 255,128 |
Manufacturing | | 1,536 | | 1,498 | | 1,755 | | 1,412 | | 6,201 |
| | 79,734 | | 57,601 | | 62,868 | | 61,126 | | 261,329 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | (389) | | (1,076) | | (350) | | (678) | | (2,493) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss per share | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | | $(0.02) | | $(0.07) | | $(0.02) | | $(0.04) | | $(0.15) |
The Company's sales are affected by weather conditions. As warm weather returns in the spring (April/May of each year), the winter's frost comes out of the ground rendering many secondary roads incapable of supporting the weight of heavy equipment until they have dried out. In addition, many exploration and production areas in northern Canada are accessible only in the winter months when the ground is frozen. As a result, the first and fourth quarters typically represent the highest sales activity for the Company. Sales levels drop dramatically during the second quarter until such time as the roads have dried and road bans have been lifted.
During 2003, the Company's sales in Q3 and Q4 exceeded Q1. This reflects the improvement in the Company's value offering to its customers resulting in increased sales as the year progressed.
Sales levels declined in Q1 and Q2 2003 by 21.0% and 4.0%, respectively, as compared to the corresponding quarters in 2002. This reflects the loss of the two tubular product customers in late 2002, which significantly impacted sales levels in 2003.
Despite the reduction in sales levels, net income (loss) has improved for each quarter in 2003 as compared to the corresponding quarter in 2002 due to an improvement in gross profit margins coupled with a reduction in SG&A costs.
Sales for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 increased 20.1% to $73.4 million from $61.1 million for the comparable 2002 period. The increase in sales reflects the general increase in capital spending by E&P companies.
Net income was $652,000 or $0.03 per share (diluted) for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2002 where the Company reported a net loss of $678,000 or a loss of $0.04 per share (diluted). The $12.3 million increase in sales resulted in a net income improvement of $1.3 million or $0.07 per share (diluted), which represents an incremental flow through of 10.8%.
16 of 55
During Q4 2003, CE Franklin generated $2.1 million in cash flow from operating activities before net change in non-cash working capital balances. This was offset by a $7.7 million investment in working capital, primarily cash, accounts receivable and inventories. These activities resulted in a $6.0 million increase in the Company's bank operating loan. There were no significant capital expenditures during the quarter.
B.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
In 2003, CE Franklin generated $4.6 million in cash flow from operating activities before net change in non-cash working capital balances, $258,000 from proceeds on the disposal of property and equipment, and $538,000 from the sale of a 50% interest in Brittania. This was offset by a $6.0 million investment in working capital, which includes a $4.9 million investment in cash and cash equivalents, $901,000 in capital and other expenditures relating primarily to replacement of desktop computers and printers, and $343,000 in repayments on capital leases. This resulted in a $1.9 million increase in the Company's bank operating loan to $23.4 million from $21.5 million.
The Company's primary internal source of liquidity is cash flow from operating activities before net change in non-cash working capital balances, which increased to $4.6 million for the year-ended December 31, 2003, an improvement of $3.6 million as compared to 2002. The improvement reflects improvement in profitability of the Company during 2003.
The Company's profitability and liquidity is dependent upon the level of capital spending by E&P companies in the western Canadian sedimentary basin. These activity levels are cyclical and driven by economic and political events that are described in more detail inSection 3D, “Risk factors”. The Company mitigates the cyclical nature of its business by adjusting its SG&A costs.
CE Franklin finances its non-cash working capital requirements; accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable and accrued liabilities with its bank-operating loan. The Company's borrowing capacity under its bank operating loan is dependent on maintaining compliance with certain financial covenants and a borrowing base formula applied to accounts receivable and inventories. As at December 31, 2003, the Company was well within the covenant compliance thresholds and was able to draw up to $35 million against its bank operating line based on the borrowing base formula.
The Company will fund capital expenditures from cash flow from operating activities before net change in non-cash working capital, and capital leases, where available. Other than standard upgrades to its enterprise and eCommerce systems, the Company does not expect significant capital expenditures in the next several years. CE Franklin's total capitalization (financed debt plus equity) at December 31, 2003 was comprised of debt of 33.4% in 2003 and 31.9% in 2002 and equity of 66.6% in 2003 and 68.1% in 2002.
For the year-ended December 31, 2003 accounts receivable increased $9.3 million or 25.1% to $46.3 million from $37.0 million. The increase in accounts receivable reflects a 20.1% increase in sales to $73.4 million during the fourth quarter of 2003 as compared to $61.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2002.
Average Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) were 51.8 days in 2003 as compared to 49.8 days in 2002. Trade accounts receivables are tightly managed by the Company with daily calls to customers to solve payment issues. In addition, the Company's accounts receivable team works closely with customers to help simplify payment and approval processes. Bad debt expense in 2003 decreased substantially to $266,000 from $688,000 for the year-ended December 31, 2002 and $1.0 million for the year-ended December 31, 2001.
Total inventory for the Company increased 19.3% to $48.5 million as at December 31, 2003 as compared to $40.7 million as at December 31, 2002. The increase in inventory levels is in anticipation of increased activity levels during the first quarter of 2004 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2003. The Company has increased its inventory of high turning items in anticipation of this increase in activity.
CE Franklin measures inventory efficiency using an inventory turns calculation. Inventory turned 5.0 times in 2003, compared to 4.9 times in 2002. The Company monitors its inventory on a daily basis in order to reduce surplus, improve turns and reduce obsolescence. The Company's inventory write-down expense was $1.5 million in 2003 as compared to $1.2 million in 2002, and $1.7 million in 2001.
17 of 55
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities have increased $18.0 million to $44.7 million as at December 31, 2003 as compared to the previous year. The increase reflects increased inventory purchases due to higher activity levels during Q4 2003, as compared to the previous year, coupled with the increase in inventory levels at year-end described above. The increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in Q4 2003 will translate to a decrease in cash and an increase in the bank operating loan during Q1, 2004.
Property and equipment decreased 29.6% to $9.0 million as at December 31, 2003 from $12.8 million as at December 31, 2002. This decrease reflects amortization expense of $4.4 million offset by capital expenditures of $601,000. As at December 31, 2003, approximately $5.7 in property and equipment (original cost of $15.6 million) relates to the Company's investment in its enterprise and eCommerce systems. These systems account for $2.8 million in amortization expense for the year-ended December 31, 2003. These assets will be fully amortized by the end of 2005. The Company anticipates that its enterprise and eCommerce systems will operate beyond 2005 as long as the Company implements the standard upgrades as provided by the supplier. These upgrades are considered inexpensive in relation to the Company's initial investment.
On July 31, 2003, CE Franklin negotiated a new $35.0 million demand operating loan facility with the RBC Royal Bank. Amounts drawn against this facility bear interest at Canadian Prime plus 1%. The maximum amount available under this facility is based on a borrowing base formula applied to accounts receivable and inventories. At December 31, 2003, CE Franklin had $23.4 million drawn against this $35.0 million credit facility. In management's opinion, this facility, together with cash flows from operating activities before net changes in non-cash working capital balances, is considered sufficient to finance its current and foreseeable operating needs.
Transactions with Related Parties
The Company is the exclusive distributor of bottom hole pump production equipment manufactured by a subsidiary of its principal shareholder Smith International. Smith International owns 55.1% of the Company's outstanding common shares. The transactions with the principal shareholder are in the normal course of business and at commercial rates. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 18 for further details. On February 17, 2004 Smith International acquired an irrevocable option, for two years, to purchase common shares of the Company at market value such that its interest in the Company would not be diluted.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that effect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis, based on historical experience and other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
The Company believes the following describes significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its Consolidated Financial Statements. These estimates affect the Company's Distribution and Manufacturing segments.
The Company extends credit to customers and other parties in the normal course of business. Management regularly reviews outstanding accounts receivable and provides for estimated losses through an allowance for doubtful accounts. In evaluating the level of the established allowance, management makes judgments regarding the parties' ability to make required payments, economic events and other factors. As the financial condition of these parties change, circumstances develop or additional information becomes available, adjustments to the allowance for doubtful accounts may be required. These adjustments, if required, would result in a decrease in accounts receivable and an increase in bad debt expense included under SG&A. The effect on the overall performance of the Company would be dependent on the size of the customer in relation to the Company's sales. For the three years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 , the Company's bad debt expense has been $266,000, $688,000 and $1.0 million, respectively.
18 of 55
The Company has made significant investments in inventory to service its customers. On a routine basis, the Company uses judgments in determining the level of write-downs required to record inventory at the lower of average cost or net realizable value. Management's estimates are primarily influenced by technological innovations, market activity levels and the physical condition of products. Changes in these or other factors may result in a write-down in the carrying value of inventory that would result in an increase in cost of sales and a reduction in inventories. For the three years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 inventory write-downs were $1.5 million, $1.2 million and $1.7 million respectively.
Future tax assets and liabilities are recognized for differences between the book value and tax value of the net assets of the Company. In providing for future taxes, management considers current tax regulations, estimates of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies. If tax regulations, operating results or the ability to implement tax planning strategies vary, adjustments to the carrying value of future tax assets and liabilities may be required.
Change in Accounting Policies
As of January 1, 2003 the Company adopted prospectively, the fair value method of accounting for common share options granted. Under this method, the Company recognizes compensation expense based on the fair value of the options on the date of grant which is determined by using the Black-Scholes options – pricing model. The fair value of the options is recognized over the vesting period of the options granted as compensation expense and contributed surplus. The contributed surplus balance is reduced as options are exercised and the amount initially recorded for the options in contributed surplus is credited to capital stock. Compensation expense of $36,000 was recorded in 2003.
No compensation expense is recorded for stock options awarded prior to January 1, 2003 as the Company applied the intrinsic method of accounting for stock options granted. The consideration paid by option holders on the exercise of these options is and will be credited to capital stock. See Note 7b to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 18 for the effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements if the fair value method was adopted for these options.
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the new accounting standard relating to goodwill and other intangible assets. The new standard requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, and are tested annually for a permanent impairment. As a result of adopting this new standard, the Company determined that $415,000 of its goodwill ($375,000 after tax) was impaired, and in accordance with the new standard, applied the $375,000 impairment to retained earnings as at January 1, 2002. The Company's net income for the year-ended December 31, 2001 would have been $859,000 or $0.05 per share diluted versus $619,000 or $0.04 per share diluted as previously reported had this amortization expense not been recorded in that period.
Both of the above changes in accounting policies were new standards by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, and the Company implemented these policies in accordance with the new standards.
Financial and Other Instruments
The Company is exposed to market risks from changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. The Company will enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts with financial institutions to fix the value of liabilities on future commitments. The Company entered into such contracts in 2003, the impact of which were not considered material, and no contracts were outstanding as at December 31, 2003.
The Company has exposure to interest rate fluctuations on its demand bank operating loan. The Company has, in the past, entered into interest rate contracts to hedge its interest rate risk associated with the demand operating loan. No such contracts were in place for 2003, 2002 or 2001. The Company does not use financial instruments for speculative purposes.
As at December 31, 2003 there were no unrecognized gains or losses associated with the above instruments.
Other Items
The Company's Form 20-F is available on SEDAR atwww.sedar.com.
19 of 55
CE Franklin has authorized an unlimited number of common shares with no par value. As at December 31, 2003 the Company had 17,178,696 common shares outstanding.
The Board of Directors may grant options to purchase up to 2,240,925 common shares. As of December 31, 2003, options to purchase 1,750,439 common shares were outstanding at an average exercise price of $3.95 per common share. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 18.
C.
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
Not applicable.
D.
Trend Information
See Item 4B and Item 5A.
E.
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has not engaged in off-balance sheet financing arrangements through special purpose entities.
F.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
Period Due | | Capital Lease Obligations | | Operating Lease Commitments | | Total | |
(thousands of Canadian dollars) | | | | | | | |
2004 | | 376 | | 3,341 | | 3,717 | |
2005 | | 87 | | 2,175 | | 2,262 | |
2006 | | 45 | | 1,346 | | 1,391 | |
2007 | | 4 | | 1,516 | | 1,520 | |
2008 | | 3 | | 385 | | 388 | |
thereafter | | 0 | | 367 | | 367 | |
| | 515 | | 9,130 | | 9,645 | |
As at December 31, 2003 the Company had issued and outstanding letters of credit totaling $4.2 million to secure offshore inventory purchases.
G.
Safe Harbor
Forward Looking Statements
The information in this Form 20-F, including this Item 5, may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that address activities, events, outcomes and other matters that CE Franklin plans, expects, intends, assumes, believes, budgets, predicts, forecasts, projects, estimates or anticipates (and other similar expressions) will, should or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on management's current belief, based on currently available information, as to the outcome and timing of future events. When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements in this Form 20-F, including those inItem 3D under the caption“Risk factors”.
Forward-looking statements appear in a number of places and include statements with respect to, among other things:
planned capital expenditures and working capital and availability of capital resources to fund capital expenditures and working capital;
the Company's future financial condition or results of operations and future revenues and expenses;
the Company's future gross profit and net profit margins;
the Company's business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations;
fluctuations in worldwide prices and demand for oil and gas;
fluctuations in levels of gas and oil exploration and development activities; and
20 of 55
We caution you that these forward-looking statements are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond CE Franklin's control. These risks include, but are not limited to, economic conditions, seasonality of drilling activity, commodity price volatility for oil and gas, currency fluctuations, inflation, regulatory changes and the other risks described inItem 3D under the caption“Risk factors”.
Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties described above or elsewhere in this Form 20-F occur, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, the Company's actual results and plans could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements expressed or implied, included in this Form 20-F and attributable to CE Franklin are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. This cautionary statement should also be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that CE Franklin or persons acting on its behalf might issue. CE Franklin does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of filing this Form 20-F with the Securities and Exchange Commission, except as required by law.
Item 6:
Directors, Senior Management and Employees
A.
Directors and Senior Management
The following table sets forth-certain information about our directors and leadership team, as of March 17, 2004.
Name and Municipality of Residence
Age
Position with CE Franklin Ltd.
Michael S. West(1)
41
Chairman, President and Chief
Calgary, Alberta
Executive Officer and Director
James E. Baumgartner
49
Vice President, Sales
Edmonton, Alberta
Brent W. Greenwood
49
Vice President,
Calgary, Alberta
Marketing and Supply
Ronald L. Koper
45
Vice President,
Calgary, Alberta
Business Effectiveness
Timothy M. Ritchie
33
Vice President, Operations
Calgary, Alberta
Salvatore Secreti
44
Vice President and
Calgary, Alberta
Chief Financial Officer
Roderick H. Tatham
45
Director of Quality and
Calgary, Alberta
Customer Service
John J. Kennedy (3)(4)
51
Director
Houston, Texas
S. Douglas Martin(1)(2)(3)(4)
72
Director
Calgary, Alberta
Douglas L. Rock (1)(2)
57
Director
Houston, Texas
Gordon R. Schnell(3)(4)
70
Director
Cochrane, Alberta
Victor Stobbe(3)
62
Director
Okotoks, Alberta
Notes:
21 of 55
1)
Member of Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.
2)
Member of Compensation Committee.
3)
Member of Audit Committee.
4)
Member of Environment, Health & Safety Committee.
The directors will stand for re-election on May 4, 2004 at the annual shareholders meeting. The following is a summary of the background of each director and member of the Company's leadership team.
Michael S. West is the Chairman, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer. He was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer and to CE Franklin's Board of Directors in January 2002. Mr. West was appointed Chairman on December 31, 2003. Mr. West has held various positions including Vice President, Operations for a major competitor in the oilfield supply and distribution business. Prior to joining the oil and gas sector in 1996, he worked for 11 years in various capacities in the automotive after-market parts industry.
James E. Baumgartner is Vice President, Sales. He has over 22 years experience in distribution of pipe, valves and fittings in the supply industry in Canada as well as internationally.
Brent W. Greenwoodis Vice President, Marketing and Supply. He graduated from the University of Saskatchewan with a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) and a Masters of Arts in History. He graduated from the University of Calgary with a Masters of Business Administration (MBA). He started his career with Franklin Supply in 1980 and has held various positions with the Company over the past 22 years.
Ronald L. Koperis the Vice President, Business Effectiveness. He graduated from the University of Calgary with a Bachelor of Commerce. Since then he has dedicated his career to the human resources and organizational development profession. Prior to joining the Company in 2000 he completed over six years as a private organizational change consultant with a diverse client list of large and mid-sized Canadian corporations.
Timothy M. Ritchie is the Vice President, Operations. He graduated from the University of Lethbridge with a Bachelor of Arts and earned his Masters of Business Administration (MBA) from the University of Calgary. He began his career with Franklin Supply at a branch over 10 years ago and has progressively taken on more senior roles for the Company.
Salvatore Secreti is the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. He graduated from the University of Calgary with a Bachelor of Commerce degree and earned his Chartered Accountant (CA) designation. Since leaving public practice, he has been the Controller or Chief Financial Officer at various public and private companies in a variety of industries. He joined CE Franklin as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in January 2001.
Roderick H. Tatham is the Director of Customer Service and Quality. He is responsible and accountable for the redesign and implementation of all business processes related to customer service and operational performance. Prior to joining CE Franklin in May 2002, he worked in various capacities as Manager of Business Process & Quality, Branch Manager, Quality Assurance Manager and Materials Coordinator.
John J. Kennedybecame a Director of CE Franklin in May 1999. He is President and Chief Executive Officer of Wilson Supply, a division of Smith International. Prior to this position Mr. Kennedy was the Chief Financial Officer of Smith International. Mr. Kennedy has worked in the energy industry for the past 25 years, and has held various executive and management level positions with Smith International, Bow Valley Petroleum, and Brown & Root. Mr. Kennedy has several professional memberships in both the United Kingdom and United States, including the Institute of Petroleum and Association of Corporate Treasurers.
S. Douglas Martingraduated from the University of Oklahoma with a Bachelor of Business Administration. He became a Director of Franklin Supply in 1993 and a Director of CE Franklin in 1995. Mr. Martin was Chairman of the Company from October 2001 to December 31, 2003. Mr. Martin has over 48 years of experience in the energy industry in both the United States and Canada. His broad range of experience has been with energy supply and distribution companies as well as exploration and production companies.
22 of 55
Douglas L. Rockhas been a Director of CE Franklin since 1999. He graduated from The Pennsylvania State University. Mr. Rock began his career with Smith International in 1974 and since then has had senior management roles. He is currently Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Smith International. As at March 17, 2004, Smith International owns 55.1% of the Company's outstanding common shares.
Gordon R. Schnellis the President of Monashee Spring Water. Prior to this he was the President and Chief Operating Officer of CE Franklin from 1995 to 1998 and interim President and Chief Executive Officer from October 2001 to January 2002. Before that time, he started his career with Continental Supply Company in 1956 where he took on increasingly senior roles and eventually became the President of Continental Emsco Company Limited. Since his retirement in 1998, he has consulted to various companies in the oilfield service industry. Mr. Schnell has been on the Board since 1995.
Victor J. Stobbe, a resident of Okotoks, Alberta, is the Chief Financial Officer of Wave Energy Ltd., a private oil and gas company, and a Director of Trican Well Service Ltd. where he serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee. Formerly he was President of American Leduc Petroleums Ltd. from October 1997
to October 2003. Mr. Stobbe, a chartered accountant, has served as a senior officer and/or a director of a number of public companies.
B.
Compensation
The following table sets forth the compensation paid by the Company to the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and to each of the next four most highly compensated executive officers who were serving in such capacities at December 31, 2003, (collectively, "the Named Executive Officers") for services rendered to the Company for the years ending December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/169b9/169b9627f8f84ae5e5b58167fe850533d6348599" alt=""
23 of 55
(1)
Perquisites and other personal benefits include a car allowance, contributions to a group RRSP plan and parking for the Named Executive Officers.
(2)
Mr. West was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer on January 15, 2002, and was appointed Chairman on December 31, 2003.
(3)
Mr. Secreti joined the Company on January 29, 2001.
(4)
Mr. Baumgartner joined the Company on July 3, 2001.
Aggregate Option Exercises During 2003 and Option Values at December 31, 2003
The following table sets forth information in respect of the aggregate stock options exercised by the Named Executive Officers during 2003 and the value of unexercised, in-the-money options as at December 31, 2003. The actual value of the unexercised in-the-money options will be determined by the market price of the Company's common shares on the date such options may be exercised by any of the Named Executive Officers. There is no assurance that the values of such in-the-money options shown in this table will be realized.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec06e/ec06e72376e81587b8522b5b877f59caab53d687" alt=""
(1)
The "Value of Unexercised In-The-Money Options at FY End" was calculated by determining the difference between the market value of the securities underlying the option at the end of the financial year and the exercise price of such options. At the end of the most recently completed financial year, the closing price of the Company's common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange was $2.76.
Stock Options Granted During 2003
The following options to purchase common shares of the Company were granted during 2003 to the Named Executive Officers of the Company pursuant to the terms of the Company's Stock Option Plan.
Name | | Securities Under Options/SARs Granted (1) (#) | | % of Total Options/SARs Granted to Employees in Financial Year | | Exercise or Base Price ($/Security) | | Market Value of Securities Underlying Options/SARs on the Date of Grant ($/Security) | | Expiration Date |
Michael S. West | | 76,044 | | 15.20% | | $2.70 | | $2.70 | | December 12, 2013 |
Salvatore Secreti | | 55,766 | | 11.20% | | $2.70 | | $2.70 | | December 12, 2013 |
Tim Ritchie | | 41,824 | | 8.40% | | $2.70 | | $2.70 | | December 12, 2013 |
Brent Greenwood | | 38,022 | | 7.60% | | $2.70 | | $2.70 | | December 12, 2013 |
Jim Baumgartner | | 38,022 | | 7.60% | | $2.70 | | $2.70 | | December 12, 2013 |
(1)
Each option granted vests over three years at a rate of 1/3 per year.
Compensation of Directors
During 2003, directors were compensated based on a flat fee of $7,500 plus meeting fees for which they were in attendance, of $1,000 per meeting for board meetings, and $750 per meeting for committee meetings.
Mr. Schnell and Mr. Stobbe were paid $10,250 in 2003, respectively. For 2003, Mr. Schnell and Mr. Stobbe were each granted 10,000 stock options at a price of $2.70 per share. Mr. Martin, who was
24 of 55
Chairman of the board until December 31, 2003, was paid $30,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses and granted 15,000 stock options, at an exercise price of $2.70 to act as Chairman of the Company. Directors are also reimbursed for their expenses incurred in respect of each meeting of the directors or special service. Employees of the Company, or an affiliate of the Company, receive no additional compensation for acting as directors of the Company. Directors who are not officers of the Company or an affiliate of the Company have in the past also been granted options to purchase common shares. No compensation was paid to any director of the Company for their services as consultants or experts to the Company.
C.
Board practices
Directors are elected at each annual meeting to hold office for a term expiring at the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders. No specific term of office is applicable to executive officers; however, they are normally re-appointed annually. The last annual meeting was held May 1, 2003, and the next annual meeting is expected to be held on May 4, 2004.
The Company has entered into an employment contract with the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer that provides for payment of up to 24 months salary if employment is terminated without cause.
The members of CE Franklin's audit committee are John J. Kennedy, S. Douglas Martin, Victor Stobbe and Gordon R. Schnell and they discharge their duties in accordance with the audit committee charter. The audit committee is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its responsibility for financial reporting, internal control as well as reviewing and recommending for approval the Consolidated Financial Statements, Management Discussion and Analysis and financial press releases.
The committee, consisting of a majority of outside directors, reviews the Consolidated Financial Statements, assessing the accounting principles, risks, adequacy and internal effectiveness of internal controls and recommends the Consolidated Financial Statements to the Board for approval. The committee also meets with management and external auditors to discuss internal controls and significant accounting and reporting issues as well as recommending the engagement or reappointment of the Company's external auditors.
The compensation committee is comprised of S. Douglas Martin and Douglas L. Rock, both of whom are independent, non-employee directors of the Company. During 2003, no such member was a current or former officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The compensation committee of the board of directors is responsible for, among other matters, reviewing the performance objectives and compensation package for the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, recommending compensation and benefits packages for the Company's leadership team and reviewing and approving fees paid to members of the board of directors.
D.
Employees
Year | Number of Employees as at December 31, | % in Field | % in Head Office |
2003 | 291 | 0.790000 | 0.210000 |
2002 | 327 | 0.810000 | 0.190000 |
2001 | 421 | 0.840000 | 0.160000 |
As of December 31, 2003, the Company had 291 employees, including part-time and hourly, all employed in Canada. The Company does not anticipate any material changes in its employee structure. CE Franklin's personnel are not unionized, and there is very little union activity in the Canadian oilfield supply industry. The Company does not employ a significant number of temporary employees.
E.
25 of 55
E.
Share ownership
As at March 17, 2004 no individual Director or individual listed under item 6A holds greater than 1% of the common shares outstanding.
Options Granted. As at March 17, 2004, the following options were outstanding under the Company's 2003 stock option plan:
Holder | | Number of Options | | Exercise Price - Cdn$ | | Date of Grant | | Expiry Date |
Directors (current) | | 5,000 | | 7.50 | | February 18, 2000 | | February 18, 2005 |
| | 10,000 | | 6.05 | | February 16, 2001 | | February 16, 2006 |
| | 55,217 | | 3.50 | | January 1, 2002 | | January 1, 2012 |
| | 100,000 | | 3.30 | | January 15, 2002 | | January 15, 2012 |
| | 10,000 | | 3.50 | | February 15, 2002 | | February 15, 2012 |
| | 10,000 | | 4.00 | | March 5, 2002 | | March 5, 2012 |
| | 76,278 | | 3.49 | | December 13, 2002 | | December 13, 2012 |
| | 111,044 | | 2.70 | | December 12, 2003 | | December 12, 2013 |
| | 377,539 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Employees | | 80,668 | | 4.40 | | April 28, 1999 | | April 28, 2004 |
| | 20,000 | | 5.50 | | October 21, 1999 | | October 21, 2004 |
| | 106,284 | | 7.50 | | February 18, 2000 | | February 18, 2005 |
| | 29,000 | | 8.50 | | May 25, 2000 | | May 25, 2005 |
| | 180,553 | | 6.05 | | February 16, 2001 | | February 16, 2006 |
| | 26,500 | | 3.28 | | August 20, 2001 | | August 20, 2011 |
| | 216,404 | | 3.50 | | January 1, 2002 | | January 1, 2012 |
| | 278,900 | | 3.49 | | December 13, 2002 | | December 13, 2012 |
| | 39,458 | | 3.30 | | February 17, 2003 | | February 17, 2013 |
| | 389,733 | | 2.70 | | December 12, 2003 | | December 12, 2013 |
| | 1,367,500 | | | | | | |
TOTAL | | 1,745,039 | | | | | | |
The Company's stock option plan (the “Plan”) was established on September 14, 1993 and was amended on November 21, 1994, October 24, 1995, September 10, 1996, February 12, 1998, April 30, 1998 and May 1, 2001. The total number of common shares available to be issued under the Plan is 2,240,925 common shares. The Plan provides that the board of directors of the Company may grant options, subject to the terms of the Plan, to directors, officers and employees of, and to persons and corporations who provide management or consulting services to, the Company and its subsidiaries. All stock options vest one-third per year commencing on the first anniversary date after grant.
Item 7:
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
A.
Major shareholders
The following table sets forth information, as ofMarch 17, 2004, ownership of the Company's outstanding voting securities by (i) the officers and directors of the Company as a group and (ii) any person known by the Company to own more than 5% of such voting securities:
Title of Class | Identity of Group | Amount Owned | Percent of Class(1) |
Common shares | Smith International | 9,465,382(2) | 55.1 |
Common shares | Westcliff Capital Management, LLC | 1,474,900 | 8.6 |
Common shares | Officers and Directors | 262,677 | 1.5(3) |
26 of 55
(1)
Percentage ownership is based on 17,178,696 shares of common shares outstanding as of March 17, 2004.
(2)
Based on the Certificate of Registered Holders registered with Computershare Trust Company of Canada, the transfer agent for the common shares.
(3)
Includes 250,777 shares issuable upon exercise of options as of March 17, 2004 exercisable under the 2001 Stock Option Plan.
At March 17, 2004, Smith International held 55.1% of the issued and outstanding shares of CE Franklin. Smith International has, by virtue of holding over 50% of the outstanding common shares, the power to elect the board of directors of the Company; however, it has agreed that at least two independent directors will be elected. Smith International and Westcliff Capital Management LLC have the same per share voting rights as other shareholders.
A.
Related party transactions
Messrs. Douglas L. Rock and John L. Kennedy, directors of the Corporation, are directors or officers of, or otherwise interested in, Smith International, which holds 55.1% of the Company.
The Company distributes, on an exclusive basis, bottom hole pump production equipment manufactured by a subsidiary of its principal shareholder Smith International. The transactions with the principal shareholder are in the normal course of business and at commercial rates. See note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 18 for further details.
B.
Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable.
Item 8:
Financial Information
CE Franklin's Consolidated Financial Statements are stated in Canadian Dollars (Cdn. $) and are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP with reconciliation to US GAAP included under Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 18. In this Form 20-F, unless otherwise specified, all amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars.
A.
Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information
Consolidated Financial Statements (audited) of CE Franklin as at and for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, are audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and include the following:
An Auditors' Report dated January 16, 2004
Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2003 and 2002
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
Consolidated Notes to Financial Statements
See Part III, Item 18 for detailed information.
Dividend Distributions
In accordance with the terms and conditions of the Company's credit facility with its primary lender, holders of common shares are not entitled to receive dividends without prior approval of the Company's primary lender.
A.
Significant Changes
There have been no significant changes since December 31, 2003.
27 of 55
Item 9:
The Offer and Listing
A.
Offer and Listing Details
| | | | The Toronto Stock Exchange ($CDN) | | American Stock Exchange ($US) |
| | | | High | | Low | | High | | Low |
1999 | | | | 7.35 | | 2.20 | | 5.12 | | 1.44 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
2000 | | | | 11.50 | | 3.75 | | 8.00 | | 2.38 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
2001 | | | | 6.85 | | 2.62 | | 4.62 | | 1.65 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
2002 | | First Quarter | | 4.20 | | 3.17 | | 2.70 | | 2.00 |
| | Second Quarter | | 5.08 | | 3.82 | | 3.34 | | 2.41 |
| | Third Quarter | | 4.00 | | 3.10 | | 3.00 | | 2.10 |
| | Fourth Quarter | | 3.91 | | 3.19 | | 2.45 | | 1.95 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
2003 | | First Quarter | | 3.45 | | 2.90 | | 2.30 | | 1.98 |
| | Second Quarter | | 3.23 | | 2.73 | | 2.36 | | 2.00 |
| | Third Quarter | | 3.25 | | 2.75 | | 2.30 | | 2.05 |
| | Fourth Quarter | | 3.10 | | 2.61 | | 2.31 | | 1.99 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
2003 | | August | | 3.25 | | 3.00 | | 2.30 | | 2.05 |
| | September | | 3.25 | | 2.75 | | 2.25 | | 2.05 |
| | October | | 3.10 | | 2.75 | | 2.20 | | 2.05 |
| | November | | 2.98 | | 2.65 | | 2.31 | | 2.07 |
| | December | | 2.76 | | 2.61 | | 2.15 | | 1.99 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
2004 | | January | | 3.69 | | 2.70 | | 2.82 | | 2.19 |
| | February | | 3.64 | | 3.40 | | 2.79 | | 2.50 |
On March 17, 2004, the closing price for the Company's common shares was Cdn. $4.00 per share on the TSX and US$2.71 per share on the AMEX. As of, March 17, 2004, the Company had 17,178,696 shares of common shares outstanding and 44 holders of record of the common shares, of whom 28 were located in the United States, one located in Mexico and 15 were located in Canada.
B.
Plan of Distribution
Not applicable.
C.
Markets
The Company's common shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) under the symbol “CFT” and also on the American Stock Exchange (AMEX) under the symbol “CFK”. The table above in Item 9A sets forth the range of high and low prices per share for the common shares on both the AMEX and TSX. The Company was initially listed on the AMEX on November 18, 1993, and subsequently began trading on the TSX on September 26, 1996.
D.
Selling shareholders
Not applicable.
E.
Dilution
Not applicable.
F.
Expenses of the issue
Not applicable.
28 of 55
Item 10:
Additional Information
A.
Share capital
Not applicable.
B.
Memorandum and articles of association
The Company was created by an amalgamation pursuant to theBusiness Corporations Act (Alberta) on December 20, 1997 with corporate access number 207725136. On February 1, 2002 the Company amalgamated with its wholly owned subsidiary CEF Technologies Ltd. with corporate access number 209671916.
The Articles of the Company place no restrictions on businesses the Company may carry on.
The Articles of the Company and By-Law No. 1 of the Company may be viewed at the Company's registered office which is 1900, 300 – 5th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, T2P 3C4.
Directors
Directors need not hold shares in the Company to qualify and be appointed as a director of the Company. The Articles of the Company provide that the minimum number of directors of the Company shall be one and the maximum number of directors of the Company shall be 15.
Pursuant to theBusiness Corporations Act (Alberta), the directors of the Company are required to disclose to the board of the directors of the Company any personal interest that they may have in any material contract prior to the approval of such contract and are required to abstain from voting as a director for the approval of such contract. A director's compensation must be approved by ordinary resolution of the board of directors and the directors are permitted to vote on their own compensation. Any new credit arrangements with lenders must be approved by ordinary resolution of the board of directors.
Every director of the Company is entitled to be indemnified out of the assets of the Company against all costs, charges and expenses, including any amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment, reasonably incurred by him in respect of any civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding to which he is made a party by reason of being or having been a director of the Company.
Shareholders Rights
The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares and an unlimited number of preferred shares, issuable in series.
The holders of any common shares are entitled to dividends if, as and when declared by the directors, to one vote per share at meetings of the holders of common shares of the Company and, upon liquidation, to receive such assets of the Company as are distributable to the holders of the common shares.
Holders of the preferred shares are not entitled to vote except at meetings of the holders of preferred shares only or as required by theBusiness Corporations Act (Alberta). The holders of the preferred shares are entitled to dividends in priority to the holders of common shares. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company or other distribution of assets of the Company, holders of preferred shares shall be entitled to receive payments or distributions before any amount shall be paid or distributed to the holders of the common shares.
Amendments to the rights of the shareholders of the Company can only be effected by alteration of the Articles of the Company, which requires a special resolution of the shareholders of the Company. There are no limitations on the rights to own securities of the Company other than pursuant to theInvestment Canada Act (Canada) described elsewhere in this Form 20-F.
Shareholders Meetings
The requirements to hold meetings of the shareholders of Company are described by theBusiness Corporations Act (Alberta) and By-Law No. 1 of the Company and the Articles of the Company. Shareholders meetings may be held at any place within the Province of Alberta or in Toronto, New York,
29 of 55
Chicago or San Francisco. The time and place of shareholders meetings is determined by a resolution of the board of directors.
In certain circumstances, and subject to the provisions of theBusiness Corporations Act (Alberta), shareholders may requisition a meeting of the shareholders without a resolution of the board of directors of the Company.
The calling of shareholder meetings is also subject to securities legislation in Canada, which prescribes the process by which the Company must send proxy materials to its shareholders. Under such securities legislation, proxy materials will generally be mailed to shareholders not less than 21 days before the date of the shareholders meeting.
The proxy materials relating to any shareholders meeting will include a notice of the meeting setting out the time and place of the meeting and the nature of the business to be transacted at the meeting, a form of proxy and management proxy circular containing, together with certain other prescribed information, sufficient description of the matters to be considered at the meeting such that the shareholder can form a reasoned judgment concerning such matters.
Change of Control
Neither the Articles nor By-Laws of the Company restrict the transfer of shares. Therefore, any change of control of the Company or merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring involving the Company would only be subject to generally applicable laws.
C.
Material contracts
See Note 4 “Bank Operating Loan” to the Company's December 31, 2003 Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 18 for a description of the Company's bank operating loan.
D.
Exchange controls
There are no Canadian laws that restrict the export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls, or that affect the payment of dividends to non-resident holders, except as described in Item 10 E below. The acquisition of control of the Company by non-Canadians is subject to theInvestment CanadaAct (the “Act”). The Act provides, among other things, that any non-Canadian, as defined in the Act, proposing to acquire control of a Canadian business such as the Company through the direct or indirect acquisition of voting interests or the acquisition of all or substantially all the assets of the Canadian business, must give notice in the prescribed form to Investment Canada, an agency of the Canadian government, and may be required to obtain approval from Investment Canada prior to implementation of such acquisition. The term “non-Canadian” is defined in the Act to include an individua l who is neither a citizen nor a permanent resident of Canada, a foreign government, or any corporation or other entity that is not Canadian-controlled.
The Act deems that the acquisition of a majority of the voting interests of the Company, or entity that controls the Company, by a non-Canadian constitutes acquisition of control of the Company. The acquisition of one-third or more (but less than a majority) of the voting interests of the Company, or entity that controls the Company, by a non-Canadian is presumed to be an acquisition of control of the Company unless it can be established that the acquirer(s) do(es) not in fact control the Company through the ownership of voting interests. The acquisition of less than one-third of the voting shares of the Company is deemed not to be an acquisition of control of the Company. If an acquisition is made in contravention of the Act, a court of competent jurisdiction may make any order it thinks fit including requiring the acquirer to divest its common shares of the Company.
Except as described above, statutes in Canada and the Province of Alberta and the charter documents of the Company do not restrict the right of non-resident or foreign owners to hold or vote common shares of the Company.
30 of 55
E.
Taxation
The following is a summary of certain Canadian federal income tax considerations, pursuant to theIncome Tax Act (Canada) (the “Tax Act”), generally applicable to holders of common shares who, for purposes of the Tax Act, are not resident and are not deemed to be resident in Canada, do not carry on an insurance business in Canada, hold the common shares as capital property and do not use or hold, and are not deemed to use or hold, common shares in the course of carrying on a business in Canada (Non-Resident Holders).
Non-Resident Holders will not be subject to Canadian federal income tax on dispositions of common shares unless such holder, together with non-arm's length persons, owned 25% or more of the shares of any class of capital stock of the Company at any time within the previous 5 years. Where the Non-Resident Holder, together with such non-arm's length persons, has held 25% or more of the shares of any class of capital stock of the Company in the previous 5 year period, such holder will be subject to Canadian income tax on such dispositions unless the applicable tax treaty (if any) between Canada and the country in which such holder resides provides that Canadian income tax is not applicable. The Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention (1980) (the “Canada-US Treaty”) provides that Canadian income tax will not be exigible on a disposition of common shares by a holder thereof who is resident in the United States for the purposes of the Canada-U.S. Treaty.
Dividends paid or credited, or deemed to be paid or credited, to Non-Resident Holders will be subject to Canadian withholding tax. The rate of Canadian withholding tax under the Tax Act is 25%, subject to any reduction in the provisions of a tax treaty between Canada and the country in which the recipient is resident. The Canada-U.S. Treaty provides for a reduction in the rate of Canadian withholding tax to persons who are residents of the United States for the purpose of the Canada-U.S. Treaty. The withholding tax rate on dividends paid to such United States residents, who are beneficial owners of the dividends, is reduced to 15% by the provisions of the Canada-U.S. Treaty. The withholding rate is further reduced to 5% in the case of a recipient that is a United States corporation that beneficially owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the Canadian corporation.
F.
Dividends and paying agents
Not applicable.
G.
Statements by experts
Not applicable.
H.
Documents on display
The articles of the Company and By-Law No. 1 of the Company and the other documents referred to in this Form 20-F may be viewed at the Company's registered office which is 1900, 300 – 5th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2P 3C4
I.
Subsidiary Information
Not applicable.
Item 11:
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Quantitative Disclosure about Market Risk
As at December 31, 2003 (thousands of Canadian dollars) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2004 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | Total | | Fair Value |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bank operating loan | | $23,368 | | $- | | $- | | $- | | $- | | $23,368 | | $23,368 |
Average interest rate | | Cdn. Prime plus 1% |
Long Term debt | | 376 | | 87 | | 45 | | 4 | | 3 | | 515 | | 421 |
Average fixed interest rate | | 0.040000 | | 0.030000 | | 0.010000 | | 0.000000 | | 0.000000 | | 0.030000 | | 0.1% |
31 of 55
The bank operating loan is payable on demand and bears interest at the Canadian prime interest rate plus 1%. The Canadian prime interest rate as at December 31, 2003 was 4.5%, and the weighted average prime interest rate during 2003 was 4.69%.
Long-term debt is comprised primarily of obligations under capital leases and are payable in equal monthly installments of $35,000 including principal and interest at various rates up to 7%.
Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
The Company is exposed to market risks from changes in the Canadian prime interest rate and foreign exchange rates with respect to the Canadian dollar/U.S. dollar. The Company will enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts with financial institutions to fix the value of liabilities on future commitments. The Company entered into such contracts in 2003, the impact of which were not considered material. No contracts were outstanding as at December 31, 2003.
The Company has exposure to interest rate fluctuations on its demand operating loan. The Company has, in the past, entered interest rate contracts to hedge its interest rate risk associated with the demand-operating loan. No such contracts were in place for 2003, 2002 or 2001. The Company does not use financial instruments for speculative purposes.
As at December 31, 2003 there were no unrecognized gains or losses associated with the above instruments.
Item 12:
Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 13:
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
Not applicable.
Item 14:
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 15:
Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time frame specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and regulations. CE Franklin's principal executive and financial officers have evaluated the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as at December 31, 2003 and have determined that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective. A controls system, no matter how well designed and operated cannot provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, with the Company have been detected.
There were no significant changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect internal control over financial reporting subsequent to the evaluation date.
Item 16:
Reserved
Item 16A:
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Company's audit committee has two financial experts, Mr. John Kennedy and Mr. Victor Stobbe. Mr. Stobbe is considered an independent director. Mr. Kennedy is an employee of Smith International.
Item 16B:
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a formal written code of ethics for its principal executive, financial and accounting officers, as well as the Company's leadership team.
32 of 55
For a copy of the code of ethics please emailinfo@cefranklin.com.
33 of 55
Item 16C:
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The following table discloses accounting fees and services of the Company:
Year-Ended December 31, | | 2003 | | 2002 |
| | (thousands of Cdn. Dollars) |
Audit fees | | $142 | | $134 |
Audit related fees | | - | | 7 |
Tax fees | | 5 | | 29 |
Other fees | | - | | 5 |
| | $147 | | $175 |
Audit related fees in 2002 represent review of goodwill valuation in accordance with the new Canadian accounting standard, as well as review of responses to letters from various securities commissions. Tax fees in 2003 and 2002 relate to the review of the Company's tax provision, tax returns and various tax planning initiatives. Other fees in 2002 relate to assistance provided in relation to the amalgamation of CE Franklin Ltd. with CEF Technologies Ltd.
Item 16D:
Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
Not applicable.
Item 16E:
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 17:
Financial Statements
See Item 18.
Item 18:
Financial Statements
Index to Financial Statements | | Page |
Auditors' Report | | 34 |
| | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 | | 35 |
| | |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the years-ended | | 36 |
December 31, 2003, December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 | | |
| | |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years-ended | | 37 |
December 31, 2003, December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 | | |
| | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years-ended | | 38 |
December 31, 2003, December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 | | |
| | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | | 39 |
34 of 55
AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Shareholders of CE Franklin Ltd.
We have audited the Consolidated Balance Sheets ofCE Franklin Ltd.as at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the Consolidated Statements of Operations, Changes in Shareholders' Equity and Cash Flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2003. These Consolidated Financial Statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these Consolidated Financial Statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the Consolidated Financial Statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the Consolidated Financial Statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
In our opinion, these Consolidated Financial Statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2003 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.
“Signed”
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Chartered Accountants
January 16, 2004
Comments by Auditors for U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting Differences
In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there is a change in accounting principles that has a material effect on the comparability of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, such as the change described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our report to the shareholders dated January 16, 2004 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not require a reference to such a change in accounting principles in the auditors' report when the change is properly accounted for and adequately disclosed in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
“Signed”
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Chartered Accountants
January 16, 2004
35 of 55
CE Franklin Ltd.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As at December 31
(in thousands of Canadian dollars)
|
| | 2003 | 2002 |
Assets | | | |
| | | |
Current Assets | | | |
Cash | | 4,881 | - |
Accounts Receivable (note 2) | | 46,283 | 36,992 |
Inventories | | 48,529 | 40,679 |
Income Taxes recoverable (note 6) | | - | 741 |
Other | | 898 | 600 |
| | 100,591 | 79,012 |
| | | |
Property and equipment (note 3) | | 8,976 | 12,757 |
Goodwill | | 7,765 | 7,765 |
Other | | 300 | - |
| | 117,632 | 99,534 |
| | | |
Liabilities | | | |
Bank overdraft | | - | 1,148 |
Bank operating loan (note 4) | | 23,368 | 21,500 |
Accounts payable | | 28,349 | 16,525 |
Accrued liabilities | | 16,359 | 10,213 |
Current protion of long-term debt (note 5) | | 369 | 297 |
| | 68,445 | 49,683 |
| | | |
Long-term debt (note 5) | | 146 | 299 |
Future income taxes (note 6) | | 1,413 | 2,381 |
| | 70,004 | 52,363 |
Commitments and contingencies (note 11) | | | |
| | | |
Shareholders' equity | | | |
Capital stock (note 7) | | 19,268 | 19,268 |
Contributed surplus | | 13,602 | 13,566 |
Retained earnings | | 14,758 | 14,337 |
| | 47,628 | 47,171 |
| | 117,632 | 99,534 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Approved by the Board: | |
“signed” Victor J. Stobbe | Director |
“signed” S. Douglas Martin | Director |
36 of 55
CE Franklin Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares) | |
| Capital Stock | | | |
| | Number of Shares | $ | | Contributed Surplus | | Retained Earnings | | Shareholders' Equity |
| | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2000 | | 17,149,153 | 19,137 | | 13,566 | | 16,586 | | 49,289 |
Stock options exercised (note 7) | | 8,938 | 49 | | - | | - | | 49 |
Net income | | - | - | | - | | 619 | | 619 |
December 31, 2001 | | 17,158,091 | 19,186 | | 13,566 | | 17,205 | | 49,957 |
Effect of change in accounting for goodwill (note 1) | | - | - | | - | | (375) | | (375) |
Stock options exercised (note 7) | | 20,605 | 82 | | - | | - | | 82 |
Net loss | | - | - | | - | | (2,493) | | (2,493) |
December 31, 2002 | | 17,178,696 | 19,268 | | 13,566 | | 14,337 | | 47,171 |
Stock options granted (note 7) | | - | - | | 36 | | - | | 36 |
Net income | | - | - | | - | | 421 | | 421 |
December 31, 2003 | | 17,178,696 | 19,268 | | 13,602 | | 14,758 | | 47,628 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
37 of 55
CE Franklin Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Operations For the years ended December 31 (in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share amounts) |
| | | | |
| 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 |
Sales | 259,557 | | 261,329 | | 377,845 |
| | | | | |
Cost of Sales | 215,994 | | 224,623 | | 334,065 |
| | | | | |
Gross Profit | 43,563 | | 36,706 | | 43,780 |
| | | | | |
Other expenses (income) | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses (note 8) | 37,360 | | 35,537 | | 39,696 |
Amortization | 4,395 | | 4,245 | | 3,879 |
Interest expense | 1,117 | | 1,099 | | 2,031 |
Foreign exchange loss (gain) | (521) | | (116) | | 299 |
Other income | (251) | | (151) | | (52) |
| 42,100 | | 40,614 | | 45,853 |
| | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | 1,463 | | (3,908) | | (2,073) |
| | | | | |
Income tax expense (recovery) (note 6 ) | | | | | |
Current | 2,010 | | (678) | | (835) |
Future | (968) | | (737) | | 315 |
| 1,042 | | (1,415) | | (520) |
| | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | 421 | | (2,493) | | (1,553) |
| | | | | |
Income from discontinued operations (note 13) | - | | - | | 2,172 |
Net income (loss) for the year | 421 | | (2,493) | | 619 |
| | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | 0.02 | | (0.15) | | (0.09) |
Discontinued operations | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.13 |
Net income (loss) per share | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | 0.02 | | (0.15) | | 0.04 |
Weighted average basic number of shares outstanding | 17,178,696 | | 17,172,373 | | 17,156,964 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
38 of 55
CE Franklin Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the years ended December 31 (in thousands of Canadian dollars) |
| 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | 421 | | (2,493) | | (1,553) |
Items not affecting cash | | | | | |
Amortization | 4,395 | | 4,245 | | 3,879 |
Gain on disposal of property and equipment | (248) | | (128) | | (48) |
Future income tax expense (recovery) | (968) | | (737) | | 315 |
Increase in inventory write-downs | 921 | | 87 | | 1,593 |
Stock options granted (note 7) | 36 | | - | | - |
| 4,557 | | 974 | | 4,186 |
Net change in non-cash working capital balances related to operations (note 9) | 52 | | (4,244) | | 22,331 |
Net cash flow from continuing operations | 4,609 | | (3,270) | | 26,517 |
Net cash flow from discontinued operations | - | | - | | 2,699 |
| 4,609 | | (3,270) | | 29,216 |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | |
Issuance of capital stock | - | | 82 | | 49 |
Increase (decrease) in bank operating loan | 1,868 | | 5,200 | | (31,700) |
Decrease in bank overdraft | (1,148) | | (688) | | (4,093) |
Decrease in long-term debt | (343) | | (269) | | (278) |
Other | - | | - | | 225 |
| 377 | | 4,325 | | (35,797) |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | |
Purchase of property and equipment | (601) | | (1,234) | | (2,313) |
Proceeds on disposal of property and equipment | 258 | | 179 | | 970 |
Proceeds on sale of Brittania (note 1) | 538 | | - | | - |
Other | (300) | | - | | - |
Net proceeds on disposal of Domino Machine (note 13) | - | | - | | 7,924 |
| (105) | | (1,055) | | 6,581 |
| | | | | |
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the year | 4,881 | | - | | - |
| | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents * beginning of year | - | | - | | - |
Cash and cash equivalents * end of year | 4,881 | | - | | - |
Cash paid during the year | | | | | |
Interest on bank operating loan | 1,077 | | 1,046 | | 2,589 |
Interest on long-term debt | 36 | | 53 | | 60 |
Income taxes | 356 | | 247 | | 567 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
39 of 55
CE Franklin Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(tabular amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars except share and per share amounts)
1. Accounting Policies
Generally accepted accounting principles
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada. These principles differ in certain respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S.”). The material differences that affect the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements are described in note 16.
The preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Basis of presentation
On January 31, 2003 the Company transferred the property and equipment and operations of its Brittania Compression operations into a wholly owned subsidiary, Brittania Industries Inc. (“Brittania”). Subsequently, a 50% interest in Brittania was sold for cash proceeds of $538,000. The Company accounts for its remaining 50% investment using the proportionate consolidation method of accounting.
On February 1, 2002 the Company amalgamated with its wholly owned subsidiary CEF Technologies Ltd.
Inventories
Inventories, consisting primarily of goods purchased and held for resale, are valued at the lower of average cost or net realizable value.
Foreign currency translation
Monetary assets and liabilities are translated into Canadian dollars at year-end exchange rates and gains or losses from translation are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Revenue and expenses are translated at the exchange rate prevailing on the date the transaction occurs.
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts with financial institutions to fix the value of liabilities or future commitments. Gains and losses arising from these contracts offset the losses and gains from the underlying hedged transactions.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost less related accumulated amortization. The Company provides for amortization of property and equipment using rates as follows:
Buildings | 5% to 10% | straight line |
Leasehold improvements | 10% to 20% | straight line |
Computer equipment and software | 15% to 33% | straight line |
Equipment and machinery | 10% to 20% | straight line |
Furniture and office equipment | 15% to 20% | straight line |
Automotive equipment | 0.300000 | straight line |
Assets held under capital lease are amortized by the straight-line method over the term of the lease or the estimated useful life of the assets, whichever is shorter.
40 of 55
CE Franklin Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(tabular amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars except share and per share amounts)
Goodwill and other intangibles
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired related to the acquisition. Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the new accounting standard relating to goodwill and other intangible assets. The new standard requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, and are tested annually for a permanent impairment. As a result of adopting this new standard, the Company determined that $415,000 of its goodwill ($375,000 after tax) was impaired, and in accordance with the new standard, applied the $375,000 impairment to retained earnings as at January 1, 2002. The Company's net income for the year-ended December 31, 2001 would have been $859,000 or $0.05 per share diluted versus $619,000 or $0.04 per share diluted as previously reported had this amortization expense not been reported in that period.
Revenue recognition
Sales are recognized upon delivery of product to the customer.
Earnings per share
Earnings per share is computed based on the weighted average basic number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share have been calculated using the treasury stock method, whereby diluted earnings per share are calculated as if options were exercised at the beginning of the year and funds received were used to purchase the Company's own stock.
Income taxes
The Company uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes under which future tax assets and liabilities are recognized when there are differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Future tax assets and liabilities are measured using substantively enacted tax rates in effect in the period in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on future tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized as part of the provision for income taxes in the period that includes the enactment date.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash and short-term, highly liquid investments, which have a maturity of less than 90 days at the time of purchase.
Stock options
The Company operates a stock option plan which is described in note 7b. As of January 1, 2003 the Company adopted prospectively, the fair value method of accounting for common share options granted. Under this method, the Company recognizes compensation expense based on the fair value of the options on the date of grant which is determined by using the Black-Scholes options – pricing model. The fair value of the options is recognized over the vesting period of the options granted as compensation expense and contributed surplus. The contributed surplus balance is reduced as options are exercised and the amount initially recorded for the options in contributed surplus is credited to capital stock.
No compensation expense is recorded for stock options awarded prior to January 1, 2003 as the Company has continued to apply the intrinsic method of accounting for stock options granted. The consideration paid by option holders on the exercise of these options is and will be credited to capital stock.
41 of 55
CE Franklin Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(tabular amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars except share and per share amounts)
2.
Accounts Receivable
Concentration of credit risk
The Company specializes in the distribution of equipment and supplies and the manufacture for sale or rent of gas compression equipment to producers of oil and gas in Canada. These customers principally operate in the oil and gas exploration and production industry.
3.
Property and Equipment
As at December 31, 2003 | | Cost | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net |
| | | | | | |
Land, buildings and leasehold improvements | | 3,827 | | 2,624 | | 1,203 |
Computer equipment and software | | 21,842 | | 15,477 | | 6,365 |
Equipment and machinery | | 3,884 | | 2,644 | | 1,240 |
Furniture and office equipment | | 1,659 | | 1,509 | | 150 |
Automotive equipment | | 65 | | 47 | | 18 |
| | 31,277 | | 22,301 | | 8,976 |
As at December 31, 2002 | | Cost | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net |
| | | | | | |
Land, buildings and leasehold improvements | | 3,628 | | 2,465 | | 1,163 |
Computer equipment and software | | 21,645 | | 12,391 | | 9,254 |
Equipment and machinery | | 4,703 | | 2,651 | | 2,052 |
Furniture and office equipment | | 1,701 | | 1,428 | | 273 |
Automotive equipment | | 61 | | 46 | | 15 |
| | 31,738 | | 18,981 | | 12,757 |
Included in computer equipment and software at December 31, is leased computer equipment with a cost of $1,302,000 (2002 – $1,060,000) and related accumulated amortization of $844,000 (2002 – $529,000).
4.
Bank Operating Loan
The Company has a demand bank operating loan in the amount of $35.0 million (2002 - $35.0 million). Amounts drawn against this facility bear interest at prime plus 1.0% (2002 – prime plus 0.5%). The prime rate as at December 31, 2003 was 4.5% (2002 – 4.5%). The maximum amount available under this facility is subject to a borrowing base formula applied to accounts receivable and inventories. As at December 31, 2003 and 2002 the maximum available under this facility based on the borrowing base formula was $35.0 million.
The facility is collateralized by general security agreement covering all present and after-acquired property of the Company including accounts receivable, inventories and property and equipment.
This facility contains certain restrictive covenants which include, among others, maintenance of certain financial ratios and to obtain approval prior to payment of dividends, repurchase or redemption of shares.
42 of 55
CE Franklin Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(tabular amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars except share and per share amounts)
5.
Long-term Debt
As at December 31 | | 2003 | | 2002 |
Obligations under capital lease | | 496 | | 596 |
Other | | 19 | | - |
| | 515 | | 596 |
Less: current portion | | (369) | | (297) |
| | 146 | | 299 |
The capital leases are payable in equal monthly installments of $35,000 including principal and interest at various rates of up to 7% (2002 – 7%). The leases are collateralized by the underlying assets and expire between November 2004 and December 2006.
Principle repayments of long-term debt are as follows:
Year ending December 31 | | |
2004 | | 376 |
2005 | | 87 |
2006 | | 45 |
2007 | | 4 |
2008 | | 3 |
| | 515 |
6.
Income Taxes
a)
Reconciliation of the income tax provision
The difference between the income tax provision recorded and the provision obtained by applying the combined federal and provincial statutory rates is as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31 | | 2003 | | % | | 2002 | | % | | 2001 | | % |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | 1,463 | | | | (3,908) | | | | (2,073) | | |
Income taxes (recovery) calculated at expected rates | | 543 | | 37.1 | | (1,547) | | (39.6) | | (884) | | (42.6) |
Losses not previously recognized | | - | | - | | (139) | | (3.5) | | - | | - |
Non-deductible items | | 168 | | 11.5 | | 156 | | 4.0 | | 224 | | 10.8 |
Difference in tax rates | | 22 | | 1.5 | | (116) | | (3.0) | | 143 | | 6.9 |
Future tax asset not recognized | | 41 | | 2.8 | | - | | - | | - | | - |
Capital and large corporations taxes | | 145 | | 9.9 | | 211 | | 5.4 | | 178 | | 8.6 |
Other | | 123 | | 8.4 | | 20 | | 0.5 | | (181) | | (8.8) |
| | 1,042 | | 71.2 | | (1,415) | | (36.2) | | (520) | | (25.1) |
b)
Significant components of future income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
43 of 55
CE Franklin Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(tabular amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars except share and per share amounts)
As at December 31 | | 2003 | | 2002 |
Assets | | | | |
Financing charges | | 113 | | 74 |
Unused loss carry forwards | | - | | 142 |
Other | | 138 | | 96 |
| | 251 | | 312 |
Liabilities | | | | |
Property and equipment | | 920 | | 1,811 |
Goodwill and other | | 639 | | 567 |
Other | | 105 | | 315 |
| | 1,664 | | 2,693 |
Net future income tax liability | | 1,413 | | 2,381 |
c)
As at December 31, 2003, Brittania had unutilized tax assets of $41,000 the benefit of which has not been recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
d)
Income taxes recoverable as at December 31, 2002 represent amounts due to the Company, net of amounts received, for recovery of prior years taxes paid due to the application of tax losses.
7.
Capital Stock
a)
The Company has authorized an unlimited number of common shares with no par value.
b)
The Board of Directors may grant options to all employees, officers and directors to purchase up to 2,240,925 common shares. The exercise period and the vesting schedule after the grant date are not to exceed 10 years and are to be established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
Option activity for each of the years ended December 31 was as follows:
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 |
| | Number of Options | | Weighted average exercise price per share | | Number of Options | | Weighted average exercise price per share | | Number of Options | | Weighted average exercise price per share |
Outstanding * Beginning of year | | 1,494,917 | | 4.83 | | 1,123,164 | | 6.43 | | 845,747 | | 6.85 |
Granted | | 540,235 | | 2.74 | | 876,951 | | 3.48 | | 470,161 | | 5.73 |
Exercised | | - | | - | | (20,605) | | 4.40 | | (8,938) | | 4.48 |
Cancelled or expired | | (284,713) | | 6.32 | | (484,593) | | 6.11 | | (183,806) | | 6.67 |
Outstanding * End of year | | 1,750,439 | | 3.95 | | 1,494,917 | | 4.83 | | 1,123,164 | | 6.43 |
Exercisable * End of year | | 639,987 | | 5.13 | | 470,056 | | 6.61 | | 538,149 | | 6.73 |
44 of 55
CE Franklin Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(tabular amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars except share and per share amounts)
As at December 31, 2003 the following stock options were outstanding:
| | Outstanding stock options | | |
Exercise price | | Number | | Weighted average remaining contractual life | | Exercisable stock options |
$2.70 | | 500,777 | | 9.95 years | | - |
$3.28 | | 26,500 | | 7.63 years | | 17,667 |
$3.30 | | 139,458 | | 8.34 years | | 33,333 |
$3.49 | | 355,178 | | 8.95 years | | 118,393 |
$3.50 | | 281,621 | | 8.01 years | | 93,874 |
$4.00 | | 10,000 | | 8.25 years | | 3,333 |
$4.40 | | 81,068 | | 0.33 years | | 81,068 |
$5.50 | | 20,000 | | 0.81 years | | 20,000 |
$6.05 | | 190,553 | | 2.13 years | | 127,035 |
$7.50 | | 112,284 | | 1.13 years | | 112,284 |
$8.50 | | 33,000 | | 1.40 years | | 33,000 |
| | 1,750,439 | | 5.32 years | | 639,987 |
The fair value of common share options granted in December 2003 is $783,500. This amount will be amortized over three years which is the current vesting period for these options. The compensation expense recorded in 2003 was $36,000. The fair value of common share options granted is estimated as at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, using the following assumptions:
Dividend yield
nil
Risk-free interest rate
4.50%
Expected life
5 years
Expected volatility
65%
For all stock options issued prior to January 1, 2003 the Company applied the intrinsic method of accounting for common share options granted to employees, officers and directors. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized in the Statements of Operations. Had the Company adopted the fair value based method of accounting, the amount expensed in each period would be the fair value of the options, calculated using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model and net of options forfeited in the period, amortized over the expected life of the options. The proforma net income (loss) and proforma net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders of the Company would be as follows:
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 |
Net income (loss) | | | | | | |
As reported | | 421 | | (2,493) | | 619 |
Proforma | | (422) | | (2,857) | | (401) |
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share | | | | | | |
As reported | | 0.02 | | (0.15) | | 0.04 |
Proforma | | (0.02) | | (0.17) | | (0.02) |
.
45 of 55
CE Franklin Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(tabular amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars except share and per share amounts)
8.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses include the following amounts:
For the years ended December 31 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 |
Bad debt expense | | 266 | | 688 | | 1,027 |
Rental expense | | 3,646 | | 3,773 | | 4,204 |
9.
Net change in Non-cash Working Capital Balances Related to Operations
For the years ended December 31 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 |
Accounts receivable | | (9,291) | | 1,415 | | 23,950 |
Income tax recoverable | | 741 | | (741) | | 4,094 |
Inventories | | (9,070) | | 9,254 | | 11,639 |
Other current assets | | (298) | | (100) | | 1,825 |
Accounts payable | | 11,824 | | (8,541) | | (15,857) |
Accrued liabilities | | 6,146 | | (5,531) | | (3,320) |
| | 52 | | (4,244) | | 22,331 |
10.
Related Parties
During the year, the Company purchased inventory from its principal shareholder, who owns 55.1% of the outstanding common shares, at commercial rates. Included in inventory at December 31, 2003 is $2,739,000 (2000-1 2002 – $2,160,000) of inventory purchased from its principal shareholder. Cost of sales includes $6,612,000 (2000-1 2002 – $5,960,000; 2001 – $7,387,000) of inventory purchased from its principal shareholder. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities include $1,010,000 (2002 – $926,000) owing to its principal shareholder. Transactions with related parties are in the normal course of business and are recorded at the exchange amount. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are non-interest bearing and are payable within commercial supplier payment terms.
11.
Commitments and Contingencies
a)
The Company leases certain office, warehouse and store facilities and automobiles under long-term operating leases. Commitments for such non-cancellable operating leases for the next five years are as follows:
Year ending December 31, | 2004 | 3,341 |
| 2005 | 2,175 |
| 2006 | 1,346 |
| 2007 | 1,516 |
| 2008 | 385 |
| | 8,763 |
b)
As at December 31, 2003 the Company had issued and outstanding letters of credit in the amount of $4,249,000.
c)
The Company is involved in various lawsuits, the losses from which, if any, are not anticipated to be material to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
46 of 55
CE Franklin Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(tabular amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars except share and per share amounts)
12.
Segment Information
The Company has two identifiable industry segments, which are the distribution of equipment and supplies to producers of oil and gas (“Distribution”) and manufacturing for rent or sale by Brittania of gas compression equipment for the producers of oil and gas (“Manufacturing”). Effective January 31, 2003, the Company sold a 50% interest in the property and equipment and operations of Brittania.
| | Distribution | | Manufacturing | | Total |
2003 | | | | | | |
Sales | | 257,125 | | 2,432 | | 259,557 |
Gross Profit | | 43,550 | | 13 | | 43,563 |
Income (loss) before interest and taxes | | 3,753 | | (1,173) | | 2,580 |
Assets | | 115,363 | | 2,269 | | 117,632 |
Goodwill | | 7,765 | | - | | 7,765 |
Capital expenditures | | 581 | | 20 | | 601 |
2002 | | | | | | |
Sales | | 255,128 | | 6,201 | | 261,329 |
Gross Profit | | 35,015 | | 1,691 | | 36,706 |
Loss before interest and taxes | | (2,233) | | (576) | | (2,809) |
Assets | | 94,764 | | 4,770 | | 99,534 |
Goodwill | | 7,765 | | - | | 7,765 |
Capital expenditures | | 1,230 | | 4 | | 1,234 |
2001 | | | | | | |
Sales | | 371,167 | | 6,678 | | 377,845 |
Gross Profit | | 41,985 | | 1,795 | | 43,780 |
Income (loss) before interest and taxes | | 604 | | (646) | | (42) |
Assets | | 107,534 | | 5,395 | | 112,929 |
Goodwill | | 7,916 | | 264 | | 8,180 |
Capital expenditures | | 2,274 | | 39 | | 2,313 |
During 2003, 14% (2002 – 13%) of the Company's sales were derived from one customer. In 2001, approximately 31% of the Company's sales were derived from two customers.
13.
Discontinued Operations
On December 18, 2001 the Company sold its Domino Machine operations for net cash proceeds of $7,924,000 resulting in a net after tax gain of $1,102,000. Domino Machine provided custom machining services to the energy industry and was not considered a core operation to the Company. The net proceeds from this transaction were used to reduce the Company's outstanding bank operating loan. The results of discontinued operations for the year-ended December 31, 2001 were as follows:
For the year ended December 31 | | 2001 |
Sales | | 9,390 |
Income before interest, taxes and gain on sale | | 2,207 |
Gain on sale | | 1,355 |
Income before interest and taxes | | 3,562 |
Interest expense | | 500 |
Income taxes - operations | | 637 |
Income taxes - gain on sale | | 253 |
Income for the year | | 2,172 |
| | |
Total assets, excluding goodwill | | 4,582 |
Total liabilities | | 588 |
Goodwill | | 2,575 |
47 of 55
CE Franklin Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(tabular amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars except share and per share amounts)
14.
Financial Instruments
The Company's financial instruments recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of cash, accounts receivable, bank overdraft, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, income taxes recoverable, bank operating loan and long-term debt. The fair values of these recognized financial instruments, excluding the bank operating loan and long-term debt, approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. At December 31, the fair value of the bank operating loan and long-term debt approximated their carrying values since the cost of the Company's borrowing approximated the current market rate of such borrowings.
From time to time the Company enters foreign exchange forward contracts to fix the value of its liabilities and future commitments. No contracts were outstanding as of December 31, 2003.
15.
Economic Dependency
In respect of the Company's sales, 20% (2002 – 30%; 2001 – 39%) is derived from the sale of tubular products, where the majority of these products are purchased from one supplier.
16.
Reconciliation of Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
These Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. The Company's accounting policies are consistent with U.S. GAAP with the following exceptions:
a)
Statements of Operations
For the years ended December 31 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 |
Net income (loss) for the year under Canadian GAAP | | 421 | | (2,493) | | 619 |
Effect of change in accounting for goodwill(i) | | - | | (375) | | - |
Effect of change in tax rates (ii) | | - | | - | | 649 |
Restructuring provision adjustment (iii) | | - | | - | | 9 |
Benefit of deferred tax assets applied to goodwill (iv) | | - | | - | | 30 |
Net income (loss) for the year under U.S. GAAP | | 421 | | (2,868) | | 1,307 |
| | | | | | |
Basic and diluted earnings per share (U.S. GAAP) | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | 0.02 | | (0.17) | | (0.05) |
Net income (loss) | | 0.02 | | (0.17) | | 0.08 |
i)
Under Canadian GAAP, the transitional impairment of goodwill, net of tax, is recorded as a charge to opening retained earnings, whereas under U.S. GAAP, the transitional impairment of goodwill, net of tax, is recorded as a charge to the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
ii)
Under Canadian GAAP, future income tax assets and liabilities are calculated using substantively enacted tax rates, whereas under U.S. GAAP changes in tax rates are not applied to the future income tax calculation until they are actually enacted. Changes to Canadian tax rates were entered into legislation in 2001 and as a result these rates are applied to future tax assets and liabilities under U.S. GAAP in 2001.
iii)
The restructuring provision adjustment relates to a 1995 transaction where $379,386 in restructuring expenditures were recorded in the purchase equation as goodwill under Canadian GAAP but were recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for U.S. GAAP.
48 of 55
CE Franklin Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(tabular amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars except share and per share amounts)
iv)
In 1996, the Company realized the benefit of certain deferred tax assets on which a 100% valuation provision had been recorded in 1995. This benefit was recorded as a reduction of goodwill for U.S. GAAP.
The 2001 adjustments in respect of both of the GAAP differences identified in (iii) and (iv) relate to differences in annual goodwill amortization.
b)
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
The reconciliation of the changes in shareholders' equity from Canadian to U.S. GAAP is as follows:
As at December 31 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 |
Shareholders* equity under Canadian GAAP | | 47,628 | | 47,171 | | 49,957 |
Restructuring provision adjustment (a)(iii) | | (324) | | (324) | | (324) |
Benefit of deferred tax assets applied to goodwill (a)(iv) | | (1,058) | | (1,058) | | (1,058) |
Shareholders* equity under U.S. GAAP | | 46,246 | | 45,789 | | 48,575 |
c)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
The following table indicates the restated amounts for the items in the Consolidated Balance Sheets of the company that would be affected had the Consolidated Financial Statements been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
As at December 31 | | 2003 | | 2002 |
Goodwill (a)(iii) and (a)(iv) | | 6,383 | | 6,383 |
Retained earnings (a)(iii) and (a)(iv) | | 13,376 | | 12,955 |
d)
Recent accounting pronouncements
i.
SFAS 150 Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity
In May 2003 Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 150 was issued to establish standards for the measurement and classification of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003. The standard has been adopted by the Company with no impact.
ii.
AcSB Section 3110 Asset Retirement Obligations
The standard harmonizes Canadian GAAP with SFAS No. 143 Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. The standard requires the recognition of a liability for any statutory, contractual or other legal obligation, normally when incurred. The Canadian standard is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2004. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this pronouncement will have an impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
49 of 55
Item 19.
Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report on Form 20-F and are incorporated by reference:
1.1
Certificate and Articles of Amalgamation as amended, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form F-1, as amended (33-68944).
i.1
Bylaws incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
F-1, as amended (33-68944).
2.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
12.2
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
13.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
13.2
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
“signed”
By:
Salvatore Secreti
Name: Salvatore Secreti
Title:
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
50 of 55
Exhibit 12.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
I, Michael West, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CE Franklin Ltd.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
Date:
March 17, 2004
By:
“Signed”
Name:
Michael West
Title:
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
51 of 55
Exhibit 12.2
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
I, Salvatore Secreti, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CE Franklin Ltd.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
Date:
March 17, 2004
By:
“Signed”
Name:
Salvatore Secreti
Title:
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
52 of 55
Exhibit 13.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
In connection with the annual report of CE Franklin Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael West, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
“Signed”
Name:
Michael West
Title:
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Date:
March 17, 2004
54 of 55
Exhibit 13.2
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
In connection with the annual report of CE Franklin Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Salvatore Secreti, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
“Signed”
Name:Salvatore Secreti
Title:Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Date:March 17, 2004
55 of 55