Enel Americas (ENIA) 20-F 2013 FY Annual report (foreign)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

¨ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

¨ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report

For the transition period from       to      

Commission file number: 001-12440

ENERSIS S.A.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

ENERSIS S.A.

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

CHILE

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Santa Rosa 76, Santiago, Chile

(Address of principal executive offices)

Nicolás Billikopf, phone: (56-2) 2353-4639, fax: (56-2) 2378-4789, nbe@enersis.cl, Santa Rosa 76, Piso 15, Santiago, Chile

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class	Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
American Depositary Shares representing Common Stock	New York Stock Exchange
Common Stock, no par value *	New York Stock Exchange
US$ 249,734,000 7.40% Notes due December 1, 2016	New York Stock Exchange
US$ 858,000 6.60% Notes due December 1, 2026	New York Stock Exchange

  *Listed, not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report Shares
of Common Stock:	49,092,772,762

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

x  Yes    ¨   No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

¨  Yes    x   No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x  Yes    ¨   No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

¨  Yes    ¨   No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filerx		Accelerated filer¨	Non-accelerated filer¨
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP¨	International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Boardx		Other¨

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

¨  Item 17    ¨  Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

¨  Yes    x   No

Enersis’ Simplified Organizational Structure (1)

As of December 31, 2013

(1) Only principal operating subsidiaries are presented here. The percentage listed for each of our subsidiaries represents Enersis’ economic interest in such subsidiary.

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
Glossary			4
Introduction			10
Financial Information			10
Technical Terms			11
Calculation of Economic Interest			11
Forward-Looking Statements			11
PART I			14
Item 1.	Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers		14
Item 2.	Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable		14
Item 3.	Key Information		14
Item 4.	Information on the Company		28
Item 4A.	Unresolved Staff Comments		131
Item 5.	Operating and Financial Review and Prospects		131
Item 6.	Directors, Senior Management and Employees		165
Item 7.	Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions		177
Item 8.	Financial Information		179
Item 9.	The Offer and Listing		181
Item 10.	Additional Information		183
Item 11.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		200
Item 12.	Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities		204
PART II			206
Item 13.	Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies		206
Item 14.	Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds		206
Item 15.	Controls and Procedures		206
Item 16.	Reserved		207
Item 16A.	Audit Committee Financial Expert		207
Item 16B.	Code of Ethics		207
Item 16C.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services		208
Item 16D.	Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees		209
Item 16E.	Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers		209
Item 16F.	Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant		209
Item 16G.	Corporate Governance		210
Item 16H.	Mine Safety Disclosure		210
PART III			211
Item 17.	Financial Statements		211
Item 18.	Financial Statements		211
Item 19.	Exhibits		212

3

GLOSSARY

AFP	Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones	A legal entity that manages a Chilean pension fund.
Ampla	Ampla Energia e Serviços S.A.	A publicly held Brazilian distribution company operating in Rio de Janeiro, owned by Endesa Brasil, a subsidiary of Enersis.
ANEEL	Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica	Brazilian governmental agency for electric energy.
Cachoeira Dourada	Centrais Elétricas Cachoeira Dourada S.A.	Brazilian generation company owned by Endesa Brasil, a subsidiary of Enersis.
CAM	Compañía Americana de Multiservicios Ltda.	A former Enersis’ subsidiary engaged in the electrical parts procurement business.
CAMMESA	Compañía Administradora del Mercado Mayorista Eléctrico S.A.	Argentine autonomous entity in charge of the operation of theMercado Eléctrico Mayorista (Wholesale Electricity Market), or MEM. CAMMESA’s stockholders are generation, transmission and distribution companies, large users and the Secretariat of Energy.
CDEC	Centro de Despacho Económico de Carga	Autonomous entity in two Chilean electric systems in charge of coordinating the efficient operation and dispatch of generation units to satisfy demand.
Celta	Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A.	Chilean generation subsidiary of Endesa Chile that operates generation plants in the SING. Celta merged with Endesa Eco in November 2013. Endesa Eco merged with San Isidro in September 2013 and San Isidro merged with Pangue in May 2012.
Cemsa	Endesa Cemsa S.A.	Energy trading company with operations in Argentina, and a subsidiary of Enersis since April 1, 2013, as a result of the capital increase.
Chilectra	Chilectra S.A.	Chilean electricity distribution company operating in the Santiago metropolitan area and a subsidiary of Enersis.
CIEN	Companhia de Interconexão Energética S.A.	Brazilian transmission company, wholly-owned by Endesa Brasil, a subsidiary of Enersis.

4

CNE	Comisión Nacional de Energía	Chilean National Energy Commission, governmental entity with responsibilities under the Chilean regulatory framework.
Codensa	Codensa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombian distribution company that operates mainly in Bogotá, and a subsidiary of Enersis.
Coelce	Companhia Energética do Ceará S.A.	A publicly held Brazilian distribution company operating in the state of Ceará. Coelce is controlled by Endesa Brasil, a subsidiary of Enersis.
COES	Comité de Operación Económica del Sistema	Peruvian entity in charge of coordinating the efficient operation and dispatch of generation units to satisfy demand.
Cono Sur	Cono Sur Participaciones, S.L.U.	A former subsidiary of Endesa Spain that held its interests in certain electricity generation, transmission, and holding companies, the shares of which were contributed to Enersis in the in-kind contribution. This company was dissolved in July 2013 after the transfer of assets to Enersis was completed.
CREG	Comisión de Regulación de Energía y Gas	Colombian Commission for the Regulation of Energy and Gas.
CTM	Compañía de Transmisión del Mercosur S.A.	Argentine transmission company and subsidiary of Endesa Brasil.
DECSA	Distribuidora Eléctrica de Cundinamarca S.A.	Colombian distribution company and a subsidiary of Codensa.
Dock Sud	Central Dock Sud S.A.	Argentine generation company and subsidiary of Enersis since April 1, 2013, as a result of the capital increase.
Edegel	Edegel S.A.A.	A publicly held Peruvian generation company and a subsidiary of Endesa Chile.
Edelnor	Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A.	A publicly held Peruvian distribution company with a concession area in the northern part of Lima and a subsidiary of Enersis.
Edesur	Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A.	Argentine distribution company with concession area in the south of the Buenos Aires greater metropolitan area, and a subsidiary of Enersis.

5

EEB	Empresa de Energía de Bogotá S.A.	Colombian stated-owned financial and energy holding company, with investments in the electricity generation, transmission, trading and distribution sectors and in the natural gas transmission, distribution and trading sectors.
EEC	Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. E.S.P.	Colombian distribution company and a subsidiary of DECSA, in which Enersis holds 19.5% interest.
EEPSA	Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A.	A publicly traded Peruvian generation subsidiary of Enersis since April 1, 2013 as a result of the capital increase with natural gas thermal plants.
El Chocón	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Endesa Chile’s Argentine generation subsidiary with two hydroelectric plants, El Chocón and Arroyito, both located in the Limay River, Argentina.
Emgesa	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombian generation company controlled by Endesa Chile.
Endesa Brasil	Endesa Brasil S.A.	Brazilian holding company and a subsidiary of Enersis.
Endesa Chile	Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.	Our publicly held generation subsidiary with consolidated operations in four countries in Latin America.
Endesa Costanera	Endesa Costanera S.A.	A publicly held Argentine generation company controlled by Endesa Chile.
Endesa Eco	Endesa Eco S.A.	A former Chilean subsidiary of Endesa Chile and owner of Central Eólica Canela S.A. and Ojos de Agua mini hydroelectric plant. Endesa Eco merged with Celta in November 2013.
Endesa Fortaleza	Central Geradora Termelétrica Fortaleza S.A.	Brazilian generation company that operates in the state of Ceará. Endesa Fortaleza is wholly-owned by our subsidiary Endesa Brasil.
Endesa Latinoamérica	Endesa Latinoamérica, S.A.U.	A subsidiary of Endesa Spain and owner of 40.3% of Enersis. Endesa Latinoamérica was formerly known as Endesa Internacional, S.A.U.
Endesa Spain	Endesa, S.A.	A Spanish electricity generation and distribution company with a 60.6% beneficial interest in Enersis.

6

Enel	Enel S.p.A.	Italian power company, with a 92.1% controlling ownership of Endesa Spain.
Enersis	Enersis S.A.	Our company, a publicly held limited liability stock corporation incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Chile, with subsidiaries engaged primarily in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity in Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Peru. Registrant of this Report.
ENRE	Ente Nacional Regulador de la Electricidad	Argentine national regulatory authority for the energy sector.
ESM	Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting	Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting.
Etevensa	Empresa de Generación Termoeléctrica Ventanilla S.A.	Peruvian generation company that merged with Edegel in 2006.
FONINVEMEM	Fondo para Inversiones Necesarias que permitan Incrementar la Oferta de Energía Eléctrica en el Mercado Eléctrico Mayorista	Argentine fund created to increase electricity supply in the MEM.
GasAtacama	GasAtacama S.A.	Company involved in gas transportation and electricity generation in northern Chile that is 50% owned by Endesa Chile.
Gener	AES Gener S.A.	Chilean generation company that competes with the Company in Chile, Argentina and Colombia.
GNL Quintero	GNL Quintero S.A.	Company created to develop, build, finance, own and operate a LNG regasification facility at Quintero Bay (Chile) in which LNG is unloaded, stored and regasified.
IDR	Issuer Default Rating	Reflects the relative vulnerability of an entity to default on its financial obligations.
IFRS	International Financial Reporting Standards	Accounting standards adopted by the Company on January 1, 2009.
IMV	Inmobiliaria Manso de Velasco Ltda.	Enersis’ wholly-owned subsidiary engaged in the real estate business.
LNG	Liquefied Natural Gas.	Liquefied natural gas.
MEM	Mercado Eléctrico Mayorista	Wholesale Electricity Market in Argentina, Colombia, and Peru.
MME	Ministério de Minas e Energia	Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy.

7

NCRE	Non Conventional Renewable Energy	Energy sources which are continuously replenished by natural processes, such as wind, biomass, mini-hydro, geothermal, wave, or tidal energy.
NIS	Sistema Interconectado Nacional	National interconnected electric system. There are such systems in Chile, Argentina, Brazil, and Colombia.
ONS	Operador Nacional do Sistema Elétrico	Electric System National Operator. Brazilian non-profit private entity responsible for the planning and coordination of operations in interconnected systems.
Osinergmin	Organismo Supervisor de la Inversión en Energía y Minería	Energy and Mining Investment Supervisory Authority, the Peruvian regulatory electricity authority.
OSM	Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting	Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting.
Pangue	Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A.	A former Chilean subsidiary of Endesa Chile and owner of the Pangue power station. San Isidro merged with Pangue in May 2012 and Endesa Eco merged with San Isidro in September 2013. Celta merged with Endesa Eco in November 2013.
Pehuenche	Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.	A publicly held Chilean electricity company, and a subsidiary of Endesa Chile.
San Isidro	Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A.	A former Chilean subsidiary of Endesa Chile. San Isidro merged with Pangue in May 2012 and Endesa Eco merged with San Isidro in September 2013. Celta merged with Endesa Eco in November 2013.
SEF	Superintendencia de Electricidad y Combustible	Chilean Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels, a governmental entity in charge of supervising the Chilean electricity industry.
SEIN	Sistema Eléctrico Interconectado Nacional	Peruvian interconnected electric system.
SIC	Sistema Interconectado Central	Chilean central interconnected electric system covering all of Chile except the north and the extreme south.
SING	Sistema Interconectado del Norte Grande	Electric interconnected system operating in northern Chile.

8

SVS	Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros	Chilean authority in charge of supervising public companies, securities and the insurance business.
TESA	Transportadora de Energía S.A.	Endesa Brasil’s transmission company subsidiary with operations in Argentina.
UF	Unidad de Fomento	Chilean inflation-indexed, Chilean peso-denominated monetary unit.
UTA	Unidad Tributaria Anual	Chilean annual tax unit. One UTA equals 12 UTM.
UTM	Unidad Tributaria Mensual	Chilean inflation-indexed monthly tax unit used to define fines, among other purposes.
VAD	Valor Agregado de Distribución	Value added from distribution of electricity.
VNR	Valor Nuevo de Reemplazo	The net replacement value of electricity assets.
XM	Expertos de Mercado S.A. E.S.P.	Colombian company Interconexión Eléctrica S.A. (ISA)’s subsidiary that provides system management in real time services in electrical, financial and transportation sectors.
Yacylec	Yacylec S.A.	Argentine transmission company and an associate of Enersis since April 2013, as a result of the capital increase.

9

INTRODUCTION

As used in this Report on Form 20-F, first person personal pronouns such as “we”, “us” or “our” refer to Enersis S.A. (Enersis or the Company) and our consolidated subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise. Unless otherwise noted, our interest in our principal subsidiaries, jointly —controlled entities and associates is expressed in terms of our economic interest as of December 31, 2013.

We are a Chilean company engaged through our subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities in the electricity generation, transmission and distribution businesses in Chile, Brazil, Colombia, Peru and Argentina. As of the date of this Report, we own 60.0% of Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. (“Endesa Chile”), a Chilean electricity generation company, and 99.1% of Chilectra S.A. (“Chilectra”), a Chilean electricity distribution company. As of the same date, Endesa, S.A. (“Endesa Spain”), a Spanish electricity generation and distribution company, owns 60.6% of Enersis directly and through Endesa Latinoamérica, S.A.U. (“Endesa Latinoamérica”). Enel S.p.A. (“Enel”), an Italian generation and distribution company, owns 92.1% of Endesa Spain through Enel Energy Europe, S.L.U.

Financial Information

In this Report on Form 20-F, unless otherwise specified, references to “U.S. dollars” or ���US$”, are to dollars of the United States of America; references to “pesos” or “Ch$” are to Chilean pesos, the legal currency of Chile; references to “Ar$” or “Argentine pesos” are to the legal currency of Argentina; references to “R$” or “reais” are to Brazilian reais, the legal currency of Brazil; references to “soles” are to Peruvian Nuevo Sol, the legal currency of Peru; references to “CPs” or “Colombian pesos” are to the legal currency of Colombia; references to “€” or “Euros” are to the legal currency of the European Union; and references to “UF” are to Development Units (Unidades de Fomento).

TheUnidad de Fomento is a Chilean inflation-indexed, peso-denominated monetary unit that is adjusted daily to reflect changes in the official Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), of the Chilean National Institute of Statistics (Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas). The UF is adjusted in monthly cycles. Each day in the period beginning on the tenth day of the current month through the ninth day of the succeeding month, the nominal peso value of the UF is indexed in order to reflect a proportionate amount of the change in the Chilean CPI during the prior calendar month. As of December 31, 2013, one UF was equivalent to Ch$ 23,309.56. The U.S. dollar equivalent of one UF was US$ 44.43 as of December 31, 2013, using the Observed Exchange Rate reported by the Central Bank of Chile (Banco Central de Chile) as of December 31, 2013 of Ch$ 524.61 per US$ 1.00.

As of March 31, 2014, one UF was equivalent to Ch$ 23606.97. The U.S. dollar equivalent of one UF was US$ 42.83 on March 31, 2014, using the Observed Exchange Rate reported by the Central Bank of Chile as of such date of Ch$ 551.18 per US$ 1.00.

Our consolidated financial statements and, unless otherwise indicated, other financial information concerning Enersis included in this Report are presented in Chilean pesos. Since January 1, 2009, Enersis has prepared its financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as issued by the International Accounting Standard Board (“IASB”).

Our subsidiaries are consolidated and all their assets, liabilities, income, expenses and cash flows are included in the consolidated financial statements after making the adjustments and eliminations related to intra-group transactions.

Until December 31, 2012, jointly-controlled companies were consolidated using the proportionate consolidation method. Commencing January 1, 2013, we began recording these jointly controlled companies using the equity method, as required by IFRS 11, “Joint Arrangements”. This change affected our accounting for Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén S.A., Inversiones GasAtacama Holding Ltda., Distribuidora Eléctrica de Cundinamarca S.A. and their subsidiaries, and Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. Our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were restated to give retrospective effect to the application of IFRS 11. These changes do not have any effect on equity or net income, in both cases, attributable to the shareholders of Enersis. Our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are presented in the form in which they were originally prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB, and do not reflect the application of IFRS 11.

10

Investments in associated companies over which the Company exercises significant influence, are recorded in our consolidated financial statements using the equity method. For detailed information regarding subsidiaries, jointly-controlled entities and associated companies, see Appendices 1, 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements.

For the convenience of the reader, this Report contains translations of certain Chilean peso amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates. Unless otherwise indicated, the U.S. dollar equivalent for information in Chilean pesos is based on the Observed Exchange Rate for December 31, 2013, as defined in “Item 3. Key Information — A. Selected Financial Data — Exchange Rates”. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York does not report a noon buying rate for Chilean pesos. No representation is made that the Chilean peso or U.S. dollar amounts shown in this Report could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars or Chilean pesos, as the case may be, at such rate or at any other rate. See “Item 3. Key Information — A. Selected Financial Data — Exchange Rates”.

Numbers in tables may not total exactly due to rounding.

Technical Terms

References to “TW” are to terawatts; references to “GW” and “GWh” are to gigawatts and gigawatt hours, respectively; references to “MW” and “MWh” are to megawatts and megawatt hours, respectively; references to “kW” and “kWh” are to kilowatts and kilowatt hours, respectively; references to “kV” are to kilovolts, and references to “MVA” are to megavolt amperes. Unless otherwise indicated, statistics provided in this Report with respect to the installed capacity of electricity generation facilities are expressed in MW. One TW equals 1,000 GW, one GW equals 1,000 MW, and one MW equals 1,000 kW.

Statistics relating to aggregate annual electricity production are expressed in GWh and based on a year of 8,760 hours, except for leap years (such as 2012), which are based on 8,784 hours. Statistics relating to installed capacity and production of the electricity industry do not include electricity of self-generators. Statistics relating to our production do not include electricity consumed by us by our own generation units.

Energy losses experienced by generation companies during transmission are calculated by subtracting the number of GWh of energy sold from the number of GWh of energy generated (excluding their own energy consumption and losses on the part of the power plant), within a given period. Losses are expressed as a percentage of total energy generated.

Energy losses during distribution are calculated as the difference between total energy purchased (GWh of electricity demand, including own generation) and the energy sold (also measured in GWh), within a given period. Distribution losses are expressed as a percentage of total energy purchased. Losses in distribution arise from illegally tapped energy as well as technical losses.

Calculation of Economic Interest

References are made in this Report to the “economic interest” of Enersis in its related companies. In circumstances where we do not directly own an interest in a related company, our economic interest in such ultimate related company is calculated by multiplying the percentage of economic interest in a directly held related company by the percentage of economic interest of any entity in the ownership chain of such related company. For example, if we own 60% of a directly held subsidiary and that subsidiary owns 40% of an associate, our economic interest in such associate would be 60% times 40%, or 24%.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Report contains statements that are or may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These statements appear throughout this Report and include statements regarding our intent, belief or current expectations, including but not limited to any statements concerning:

11

• our capital investment program;

• trends affecting our financial condition or results from operations;

• our dividend policy;

• the future impact of competition and regulation;

• political and economic conditions in the countries in which we or our related companies operate or may operate in the future;

• any statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “believes”, “expects”, “predicts”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “estimates”, “should”, “may” or similar expressions; and

• other statements contained or incorporated by reference in this Report regarding matters that are not historical facts.

Because such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to:

• changes in the regulatory framework of the electricity industry in one or more of the countries in which we operate;

• our ability to implement proposed capital expenditures, including our ability to arrange financing where required;

• the nature and extent of future competition in our principal markets;

• political, economic and demographic developments in the markets in South America where we conduct our business; and

• the factors discussed below under “Risk Factors”.

You should not place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date that they were made. Our independent public accountants have not examined or compiled the forward-looking statements and, accordingly, do not provide any assurance with respect to such statements. You should consider these cautionary statements together with any written or oral forward-looking statements that we may issue in the future. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to forward-looking statements contained in this Report to reflect later events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

For all these forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Bocamina II’s Shutdown

On December 17, 2013, the Court of Concepción, in southern Chile, ordered the temporary shutdown of our 350 MW coal-fired thermal power plant, Bocamina II. The court granted an injunction in favor of local fishermen who claim our facility is harmful to marine life and causes pollution. The financial impact of Bocamina II’s shutdown had no material effect on our 2013 results because its operation ceased near the end of the fiscal year. However, as of the date of this Report, the plant remains shut down while we appeal the case. On December 23, 2013, we submitted all required documents and studies to the Chilean Environmental Superintendence. Our operating income is reduced between US$ 20 million and US$ 44 million each month the facility remains shut down.

Coelce Tender Offer

On February 17, 2014, in connection with a voluntary tender offer carried out over a 33-day period commencing on January 16, Enersis purchased an additional 15.1% interest in Coelce, our Brazilian distribution subsidiary, in an exchange auction conducted on the São Paulo stock exchange, the BM&F BOVESPA. As a result, our economic interest in Coelce increased from 49.2% as of December 31, 2013 to the current 64.3%. The shares purchased included 2,964,650 common shares, 8,818,006 Series A preferred shares and 424 Series B preferred shares, in each case at a fixed R$ 49 per share, which represented a 20.1% premium over the weighted average price

12

of the Series A preferred shares for the 30 trading days prior to the public announcement of our offer. The aggregate amount paid for the shares was equivalent to Ch$ 133 billion. This acquisition has no effect on the statement of comprehensive income of Enersis in 2014, as it consists of an increase in the ownership interest in a subsidiary of Enersis. For the same reason, this transaction does not change the amounts of assets and liabilities contributed by Coelce in the consolidated financial statements of Enersis, since it is an equity transaction. The difference between the book value of non-controlling interests acquired and the amount paid for the ownership interests acquired, resulted in a charge of Ch$ 76.3 billion that was directly reflected in Other Reserves in the Equity Attributable to Shareholders of Enersis.

Pursuant to Brazilian regulations, because Enersis received tenders of more than two thirds of the outstanding free float of common shares, we were required to extend the tender offer for all outstanding common shares until May 16, 2014 at the same price of R$ 49 per common share, after adjustment for the Central Bank of Brazil’s overnight interest rate (SELIC) as of the February 20, 2014 settlement date. As of the date of this Report, we have purchased 17,253 additional common shares. Because we did not receive tender for more than two thirds of either series of the preferred shares, the tender offer for the two series of preferred shares was not extended. The purchase of the 15.1% interest in Coelce was financed with the proceeds from our capital increase concluded on March 28, 2013.

HidroAysén Hydroelectric Project

In August 2008, HidroAysén submitted an Environmental Impact Assessment Study to the Chilean environmental authority for its approval. On May 9, 2011, we received a favorable environmental qualification resolution, though it contained certain conditions. In June 2011, opponents to the project filed 34 requests for review, and HidroAysén filed one, with the Council of Ministers, consisting of six cabinet members chaired by the Minister of the Environment, all requesting the review of certain conditions established in the resolution. By law, the authority has 60 business days to review the submission. In our cause, the authority took over two years and requested additional studies. On January 30, 2014, toward the end of former Chilean President Sebastián Piñera’s term, the Council of Ministers met to review the appeals. The majority of the issues were resolved, but the Council requested additional background information and new studies on certain points. In March 2014, Chilean President Michelle Bachelet took office, and a new Council of Ministers was convened, which repealed the Council’s earlier decisions. The new Council stated it would review the matter once again and resolve all claims within the 60 business day timeframe established by law. We are awaiting the decision of the Council.

GasAtacama Acquistion

On March 31, 2014, the Board of Directors of Endesa Chile approved the acquisition from Southern Cross Latin American Private Equity Fund III, LP (“Southern Cross”) of all of its interest in Inversiones GasAtacama Holding Ltda. (“GasAtacama Holding”), which owns 50% of GasAtacama. Endesa Chile currently holds a 48.1% economic interest in GasAtacama, and Enersis beneficially owns the remaining 1.9%. An affiliate of Southern Cross will assign Endesa Chile a US$ 28,330,155 promissory note executed by an affiliate of GasAtacama Holding in favor of the Southern Cross affiliate. Endesa Chile will pay US$ 309 million for the shares and the assignment of the promissory note. The transaction is in settlement of an arbitral dispute between Southern Cross and Endesa Chile relating to the terms of a right of first refusal provision in a shareholders agreement entered into by the parties and relating to GasAtacama Holding. Completion of the transaction is subject to execution and delivery of definitive documentation by the parties on or before April 30, 2014.

Los Cóndores Hydroelectric Project

On March 27, 2014, our Board of Directors authorized the 150 MW Los Cóndores hydroelectric project, with a total investment, including the transmission line, of US$661.5 million. Los Cóndores is in Chile’s seventh region and will generate power from the Maule Lake reservoir. Commercial start-up is expected by the end of 2018.

13

PART I

Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

Not applicable.

Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not applicable.

Item 3. Key Information

A. Selected Financial Data

The following summary of consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements included in this Report. The consolidated financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this Report. Our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 were prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB. Until December 31, 2012, jointly-controlled companies were consolidated using the proportionate consolidation method. Commencing January 1, 2013, we began recording these jointly controlled companies using the equity method, as required by IFRS 11, “Joint Arrangements”. This change affected our accounting for Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén S.A., Inversiones GasAtacama Holding Ltda., Distribuidora Eléctrica de Cundinamarca S.A. and their subsidiaries, and Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. Our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were restated to give retrospective effect to the application of IFRS 11. These changes do not have any effect on equity or net income, in both cases, attributable to the shareholders of Enersis. Our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are presented in the form in which they were originally prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB, and do not reflect the application of IFRS 11.

Amounts are expressed in millions except for ratios, operating data, shares and ADS (American Depositary Shares) data. For the convenience of the reader, all data presented in U.S. dollars in the following summary, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, is translated at the Observed Exchange Rate for that date of Ch$ 524.61 per US$ 1.00. The U.S. dollar observed exchange rate (dólar observado) (the “Observed Exchange Rate”), which is reported by the Central Bank of Chile and published daily on its web page, is the weighted average exchange rate of the previous business day’s transactions in the Formal Exchange Market. Nevertheless, the Central Bank of Chile may intervene by buying or selling foreign currency on the Formal Exchange Market to attempt to maintain the Observed Exchange Rate within a desired range.

No representation is made that the Chilean peso or U.S. dollar amounts shown in this Report could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars or Chilean pesos, at such rate or at any other rate. For more information concerning historical exchange rates, see “ — Exchange Rates” below.

14

The following tables set forth the selected consolidated financial data of Enersis for the periods indicated and the operating data of subsidiaries:

	As of and for the year ended December 31,
	2013 (1)		2013		2012 (2)		2011 (2)		2010		2009
	(US$ millions)						(Ch$ millions)
Consolidated Income Statement Data
Revenues and other operating income		11,941		6,264,446		6,495,953		6,386,600		6,563,581		6,472,056
Operating expenses (3)		(8,622)		(4,523,308)		(5,025,190)		(4,847,673)		(4,859,280)		(4,544,611)
Operating income		3,319		1,741,138		1,470,763		1,538,927		1,704,301		1,927,445
Financial income (expense), net		(320)		(168,029)		(216,642)		(233,666)		(270,605)		(309,256)
Total gain (loss) on sale of non-current assets not held for sale		37		19,170		15,186		(5,769)		11,711		50,502
Other non-operating income		48		25,289		30,382		27,929		1,288		2,374
Income before income tax		3,083		1,617,569		1,299,689		1,327,421		1,446,695		1,671,065
Income tax		(961)		(504,168)		(406,676)		(455,469)		(346,006)		(359,737)
Net income		2,122		1,113,401		893,013		871,952		1,100,689		1,311,328
Net income attributable to shareholders of Enersis		1,255		658,514		377,351		375,471		486,227		660,231
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests		867		454,887		515,662		496,481		614,462		651,097
Net income (loss) from continuing operations per average number of Share basic and diluted (Ch$/US$)		0.03		14.56		11.56		11.50		14.89		20.22
Net income (loss) from continuing operations per average number of ADS (Ch$ / US$)		1.39		728.14		577.85		574.97		744.58		1,011.04
Net income (loss) per average number of Share, basic and diluted (Ch$/US$ per share)		0.03		14.56		11.56		11.50		14.89		20.22
Net income (loss) per average number of ADS (Ch$/US$ per ADS)		1.39		728.14		577.85		574.97		744.58		1,011.04
Cash dividends per Share (Ch$/ US$ per share)		0.01		4.25		5.75		7.45		4.64		7.02
Cash dividends per ADS (Ch$/ US$ per ADS)		0.41		212.51		287.49		372.50		232.00		351.00
Weighted average number of shares of common stock (thousands)				45,218,860		32,651,166		32,651,166		32,651,166		32,651,166
Weighted average number of ADS (thousands)				97,829		73,894		82,456		82,320		81,303
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
Total assets		28,931		15,177,664		13,246,492		13,649,087		13,005,845		13,210,140
Non-current liabilities		7,032		3,688,940		3,941,555		4,336,012		4,084,540		4,637,749
Equity attributable to shareholders of Enersis		11,758		6,168,554		3,893,799		3,895,729		3,735,545		3,518,480
Equity attributable to non-controlling interests		4,458		2,338,911		3,064,408		2,995,312		2,778,483		2,858,524
Total equity		16,216		8,507,464		6,958,207		6,891,041		6,514,028		6,377,004
Capital stock (4)		11,109		5,828,040		2,983,642		2,983,642		2,983,642		2,983,642
Other Consolidated Financial Data
Capital expenditures (CAPEX) (5)		1,477		774,820		707,291		673,673		701,341		736,474
Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses (6)		973		510,351		477,096		552,984		557,391		539,655

(1) Solely for the convenience of the reader, Chilean peso amounts have been translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate of Ch$ 524.61 per U.S. dollar, the Observed Exchange Rate for December 31, 2013.

(2) Restated as a result of the application of IFRS 11.

(3) Operating expenses includes selling and administration expense.

(4) Includes share premium.

(5) CAPEX figures represent actual payments for each year.

(6) For further detail, please refer to Notes 8C and 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

15

	As of and for the year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011		2010		2009
OPERATING DATA OF SUBSIDIARIES
Chilectra (Chile)
Electricity sold (GWh)		15,152		14,445		13,697		13,098		12,585
Number of customers (thousands)		1,694		1,659		1,638		1,610		1,579
Total energy losses (%) (1)		5.3%		5.4%		5.5%		5.8%		6.1%
Edesur (Argentina)
Electricity sold (GWh)		18,137		17,738		17,233		16,759		16,026
Number of customers (thousands)		2,444		2,389		2,389		2,353		2,305
Total energy losses (%) (1)		10.8%		10.6%		10.5%		10.5%		10.5%
Ampla (Brazil)
Electricity sold (GWh)		11,049		10,816		10,223		9,927		9,394
Number of customers (thousands)		2,801		2,712		2,644		2,571		2,522
Total energy losses (%) (1)		19.8%		19.6%		19,7%		20.5%		21.2%
Coelce (Brazil)
Electricity sold (GWh)		10,718		9,878		8,970		8,850		7,860
Number of customers (thousands)		3,500		3,338		3,224		3,095		2,965
Total energy losses (%) (1)		12.5%		12.6%		11.9%		12.1%		11.6%
Codensa (Colombia)
Electricity sold (GWh)		13,342		12,972		12,552		12,141		11,837
Number of customers (thousands)		2,687		2,588		2,496		2,429		2,361
Total energy losses (%) (1)		7.0%		7.3%		7.8%		8.2%		8.2%
Edelnor (Peru)
Electricity sold (GWh)		7,045		6,863		6,572		6,126		5,716
Number of customers (thousands)		1,255		1,203		1,144		1,098		1,061
Total energy losses (%) (1)		7.9%		8.2%		8.2%		8.3%		8.1%
Endesa Chile (Chile)
Installed capacity in Chile (MW) (2)		5,571		5,571		5,221		5,221		5,260
Installed capacity in Argentina (MW)		3,652		3,652		3,652		3,652		3,652
Installed capacity in Colombia (MW)		2,925		2,914		2,914		2,914		2,895
Installed capacity in Peru (MW)		1,540		1,657		1,668		1,668		1,667
Generation in Chile (GWh) (2) (3)		19,438		19,194		19,296		19,096		20,266
Generation in Argentina (GWh) (3)		10,840		11,207		10,713		10,862		11,877
Generation in Colombia (GWh) (3)		12,748		13,251		12,051		11,237		12,622
Generation in Peru (GWh) (3)		8,391		8,570		8,980		8,293		7,984
Endesa Brasil (Brazil)
Installed capacity in Brazil (MW)		987		987		987		987		987
Generation in Brazil (GWh) (3)		4,992		5,183		4,129		5,044		3,127
Dock Sud (Argentina) (4)
Installed capacity in Argentina (MW)		870		n.a		n.a		n.a		n.a
Generation in Argentina (GWh)		3,582		n.a		n.a		n.a		n.a
EEPSA (Peru) (4)
Installed capacity in Peru (MW)		302		n.a		n.a		n.a		n.a
Generation in Peru (GWh)		98		n.a		n.a		n.a		n.a

(1) Energy losses are calculated as the difference between total energy purchased (GWh of electricity demand, including own generation) and the energy sold (GWh), within a given period. Losses are expressed as a percentage of total energy purchased. Losses in distribution arise from illegally tapped energy as well as technical failures.

(2) Excludes the proportional capacity and generation of GasAtacama, which was included in previous filings, because GasAtacama is now recorded under the equity method due to the application of IFRS 11.

(3) Beginning in 2013, we changed how we calculate our electricity generation. The impact of applying the new criteria on a cumulative basis for 2009 through 2012 is not material. We now report the energy effectively available for sales in all countries.

(4) As a result of our capital increase, Dock Sud in Argentina and EEPSA in Peru were contributed by Endesa Spain and their consolidation by Enersis began as of April 2013; therefore, 2013 data only includes the nine-month period from April through December 2013.

16

Exchange Rates

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Chilean peso and the U.S. dollar will affect the U.S. dollar equivalent of the peso price of our shares of common stock on the Santiago Stock Exchange (Bolsa de Comercio de Santiago), the Chilean Electronic Stock Exchange (Bolsa Electrónica de Chile) and the Valparaíso Stock Exchange (Bolsa de Corredores de Valparaíso). These exchange rate fluctuations will likely affect the price of our ADSs and the conversion of cash dividends relating to the common shares represented by ADSs from Chilean pesos to U.S. dollars. In addition, to the extent that significant financial liabilities of the Company are denominated in foreign currencies, exchange rate fluctuations may have a significant impact on earnings.

In Chile, there are two currency markets, the Formal Exchange Market (Mercado Cambiario Formal) and the Informal Exchange Market (Mercado Cambiario Informal). The Formal Exchange Market is comprised of banks and other entities authorized by the Central Bank of Chile. The Informal Exchange Market is comprised of entities that are not expressly authorized to operate in the Formal Exchange Market, such as certain foreign exchange houses and travel agencies, among others. The Central Bank of Chile has the authority to require that certain purchases and sales of foreign currencies be carried out on the Formal Exchange Market. Both the Formal and Informal Exchange Markets are driven by free market forces. Current regulations require that the Central Bank of Chile be informed of certain transactions and that they be effected through the Formal Exchange Market.

The U.S. dollar observed exchange rate (dólar observado) (the “Observed Exchange Rate”), which is reported by the Central Bank of Chile and published daily on its web page, is the weighted average exchange rate of the previous business day’s transactions in the Formal Exchange Market. Nevertheless, the Central Bank of Chile may intervene by buying or selling foreign currency on the Formal Exchange Market to attempt to maintain the Observed Exchange Rate within a desired range.

The Informal Exchange Market reflects transactions carried out at an informal exchange rate (the “Informal Exchange Rate”). There are no limits imposed on the extent to which the rate of exchange in the Informal Exchange Market can fluctuate above or below the Observed Exchange Rate. Foreign currency for payments and distributions with respect to the ADSs may be purchased either in the Formal or the Informal Exchange Market, but such payments and distributions must be remitted through the Formal Exchange Market. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York does not report a noon buying rate for Chilean pesos. As of December 31, 2013, the U.S. dollar exchange rate used by us was Ch$ 524.61 per US$ 1.00.

The following table sets forth the low, high, average and period-end Observed Exchange Rate for U.S. dollars for the periods set forth below, as reported by the Central Bank of Chile:

	Daily Observed Exchange Rate (Ch$ per US$) (1)
Year ended December 31,	Low (2)		High (2)		Average (3)		Period-end
2013		466.50		533.95		498.83		524.61
2012		469.65		519.69		486.31		479.96
2011		455.91		533.74		483.45		519.20
2010		468.01		549.17		510.38		468.01
2009		491.09		643.87		554.22		507.10
Month ended
March 2014		550.53		573.24		n.a.		551.18
February 2014		546.94		563.32		n.a.		559.38
January 2014		527.53		553.84		n.a.		553.84
December 2013		523.76		533.95		n.a.		524.61
November 2013		512.53		529.64		n.a.		529.64
October 2013		493.96		508.58		n.a.		507.64

Source: Central Bank of Chile.

(1) Nominal figures.

(2) Exchange rates are the actual low and high, on a day-by-day basis for each period.

(3) The average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period.

17

As of March 31, 2014, the U.S. dollar exchange rate was Ch$ 551.18 per US$ 1.00.

Calculation of the appreciation or devaluation of the Chilean peso against the U.S. dollar in any given period is made by determining the percent change between the reciprocals of the Chilean peso equivalent of US$ 1.00 at the end of the preceding period and the end of the period for which the calculation is being made. For example, to calculate the appreciation of the year-end Chilean peso in 2013, one determines the percent change between the reciprocal of Ch$ 479.96 (the value of one U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2012) and the reciprocal of Ch$ 524.61(the value of one U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2013). In this example, the percentage change between 0.002084 (the reciprocal of Ch$ 479.96) and 0.001906 (the reciprocal of Ch$ 524.61) is negative 8.5 %, which represents the 2013 year-end devaluation of the Chilean peso against the 2012 year-end U.S. dollar. A positive percentage change means that the Chilean peso appreciated against the U.S. dollar, while a negative percentage change means that the Chilean peso devaluated against the U.S. dollar.

The following table sets forth the period-end rates for U.S. dollars for the years ended December 31, 2009 through December 31, 2013 and through the date indicated in the table below, based on information published by the Central Bank of Chile.

	Chilean Peso Equivalent of US$  1
	Period End		Appreciation (Devaluation) (1)
	(in Ch$)		(in %)
Year Ended December 31,
2013		524.61		(8.5)
2012		479.96		8.2
2011		519.20		(9.9)
2010		468.01		8.4
2009		507.10		25.5

Source: Central Bank of Chile.

(1) Calculated based on the variation of period-end exchange rates.

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness.

Not applicable.

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds.

Not applicable.

D. Risk Factors.

A financial or other crisis in any region worldwide can have a significant impact on the countries in which we operate, and consequently, may adversely affect our operations, as well as our liquidity.

The five countries in which we operate are vulnerable to external shocks, including financial and political events, which could cause significant economic difficulties and affect their growth. If any of these economies experience lower than expected economic growth or a recession, it is likely that our customers will demand less electricity. Furthermore, some of our customers may experience difficulties paying their electric bills, possibly increasing our uncollectible accounts. Any of these situations could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Financial and political crisis in other parts of the world could also adversely affect our business. For example, the current crisis in Ukraine could result in higher fuel prices worldwide, which in turn could increase our cost of fuel for our thermal generation plants and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

18

In addition, a financial crisis and its disruptive effects on the financial industry could adversely impact our ability to obtain new bank financings on the same historical terms and conditions. Our ability to tap the capital markets in the five countries in which we operate, as well as the international capital markets for other sources of liquidity, may also be diminished, or such financing may be available only at higher interest levels. Reduced liquidity could, in turn, adversely affect our capital expenditures, our long-term investments and acquisitions, our growth prospects and our dividend payout policy.

South American economic fluctuations are likely to affect our results from operations and financial condition, as well as the value of our securities.

All of our operations are located in five South American countries. Accordingly, our consolidated revenues may be affected by the performance of South American economies as a whole. If local, regional, or worldwide economic trends adversely affect the economy of any of the five countries in which we have investments or operations, our financial condition and results from operations could be adversely affected. Moreover, we have investments in volatile countries, such as Argentina. Insufficient cash flows for our subsidiaries located in Argentina have, in some cases, resulted in their inability to meet debt obligations and the need to seek waivers to comply with restrictive debt covenants.

The majority of our operating income is generated in Brazil and Chile and 62% of our operating revenues in 2013 were derived from our operations in these countries, and as a result our financial condition and results of operations are particularly dependent on Brazilian and Chilean economic performance. In 2013, Brazilian GDP increased 2.3% compared to a 1.0% increase in 2012. In 2014, Brazilian GDP is forecast to grow by 2.3% according to the International Monetary Fund. In 2013, Chilean GDP increased by 4.2% compared to a 5.6% increase in 2012. In 2014, Chilean GDP is forecast to grow by 3.75% to 4.75% according to the Central Bank of Chile. Future adverse developments in these economies may impair our ability to execute our strategic plans, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, South American financial and securities markets are, to varying degrees, influenced by economic and market conditions in other countries. Although economic conditions are different in each country, investor reaction to developments in one country may have a significant contagion effect on the securities of issuers in other countries, including Brazil and Chile. Brazilian and Chilean financial and securities markets may be adversely affected by events in other countries, which could adversely affect the value of our securities.

A continuing financial crisis in Argentina or a deeper devaluation of the Argentine peso could have an adverse effect on our debt.

The Argentine peso is under increasing devaluation pressure against the U.S. dollar. The Argentine government is actively intervening in the currency market in response to capital flight from the country. Currently, Argentina is making incremental adjustments to the Argentine peso and imposing tight restrictions on buying and selling foreign currencies in the country. Media reports from the country describe a robust informal parallel market (referred to as the blue dollar market) in which the Argentine peso appears to have depreciated more steeply than the “official” rate. Because there is no liquidity in the derivatives market in Argentina, our debt is exposed to further devaluation of the Argentine peso.

Argentina’s sovereign creditworthiness is deteriorating, based on market data and reports from credit ratings agencies. The insurance cost of sovereign bonds, as measured by credit default swaps, increased to 16.5% from 14.4% in 2013, which indicates an increased probability of a distressed credit event. Argentina’s sovereign debt rating is subject to downgrade actions over the coming months as reflected by the negative outlook established by the major rating agencies. For instance, Standard & Poor’s downgraded the country’s sovereign credit rating to “CCC+” and maintained a negative outlook as of September 2013. Further deterioration to Argentina’s economy could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

19

Certain South American countries have been historically characterized by frequent and occasionally drastic economic interventionist measures by governmental authorities, including expropriations, which may adversely affect our business and financial results.

Governmental authorities have altered monetary, credit, tariff, tax and other policies to influence the course of the economies of Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Peru. To a lesser extent, the Chilean government has also exercised in the past and continues to exercise a substantial influence over many aspects of the private sector, which may result in changes to economic or other policies. These governmental actions, intended to control inflation and affect other policies, have often involved wage, price and tariff rate controls, as well as other interventionist measures, such as expropriation or nationalization. For example, Argentina froze bank accounts and imposed capital restrictions in 2001, nationalized the private sector pension funds in 2008, used its Central Bank reserves to pay down indebtedness maturing in 2010 and expropriated Repsol’s 51% stake in YPF in 2012. In 2010, Colombia imposed an equity tax to finance reconstruction and repair efforts related to severe flooding, which resulted in an extraordinary tax expense accrual booked in January 2011 for taxes payable in 2011 through 2014.

Changes in the policies of these governmental and monetary authorities with respect to tariffs, exchange controls, regulations and taxation could reduce our profitability. Inflation, devaluation, social instability and other political, economic or diplomatic developments, including the response by governments in the region to these circumstances, could also reduce our profitability. Any of these scenarios could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our electricity business is subject to risks arising from natural disasters, catastrophic accidents and acts of terrorism, which could adversely affect our operations, earnings and cash flow.

Our primary facilities include power plants, transmission and distribution assets, pipelines, LNG terminals and re-gasification plants, storage and chartered LNG tankers. Our facilities may be damaged by earthquakes, flooding, fires, other catastrophic disasters arising from natural or accidental human causes, as well as acts of terrorism. A catastrophic event could cause disruptions in our business, significant decreases in revenues due to lower demand or significant additional costs to us not covered by our business interruption insurance. There may be lags between a major accident or catastrophic event and the final reimbursement from our insurance policies, which typically carry a deductible and are subject to per event policy maximums.

As an example, on February 27, 2010, Chile experienced a major earthquake in the Bío-Bío region, with a magnitude of 8.8 on the Richter scale, followed by a very destructive tsunami. Our Bocamina and Bocamina II thermal generation units, which are located near the epicenter, sustained significant damage as a result of the earthquake.

We are subject to financing risks, such as those associated with funding our new projects and capital expenditures, and risks related to refinancing our maturing debt; we are also subject to debt covenant compliance, all of which could adversely affect our liquidity.

As of December 31, 2013, our debt totaled Ch$ 3,697 billion.

Our debt had the following maturity timetable:

• Ch$ 907 billion in 2014;

• Ch$ 773 billion from 2015 to 2016;

• Ch$ 597 billion from 2017 to 2018; and

• Ch$ 1,420 billion thereafter.

20

Set forth below is a breakdown by country for debt maturing in 2014:

• Ch$ 447 billion for Chile;

• Ch$ 186 billion for Argentina;

• Ch$ 136 billion for Colombia

• Ch$ 71 billion for Peru; and

• Ch$ 67 billion for Brazil.

Some of our debt agreements are subject to (1) financial covenants, (2) affirmative and negative covenants, (3) events of default, (4) mandatory prepayments for contractual breaches, and (5) certain change of control clauses for material mergers and divestments, among other provisions. A significant portion of our financial indebtedness is subject to cross default provisions, which have varying definitions, criteria, materiality thresholds and applicability with respect to subsidiaries that could give rise to such a cross default.

In the event that we or our subsidiaries breach any of these material contractual provisions, our creditors and bond holders may demand immediate repayment, and a significant portion of our indebtedness could become due and payable.

We may be unable to refinance our indebtedness or obtain such refinancing on terms acceptable to us. In the absence of such refinancing, we could be forced to dispose of assets in order to make the payments due on our indebtedness under circumstances that might not be favorable to obtaining the best price for such assets. Furthermore, we may be unable to sell our assets quickly enough, or at sufficiently high prices, to enable us to make such payments.

We may also be unable to raise the necessary funds required to finish our projects under development or under construction. Market conditions prevailing at the moment we require these funds or other unforeseen project costs can compromise our ability to finance these projects and expenditures.

As of the date of this Report, Argentina continues to be the country in which we operate with the highest refinancing risk. As of December 31, 2013, the third-party debt of our Argentine subsidiaries amounted to Ch$ 205 billion. As long as fundamental issues concerning the electricity sector remain unresolved, we will roll over our outstanding Argentine debt to the extent we are able to do so. If our creditors will not continue to roll over our debt when it becomes due and we are unable to refinance such obligations, we could default on such indebtedness.

Our Argentine subsidiary, Endesa Costanera, did not make any installment payments due in 2012 and 2013 under the terms of a 1996 supplier credit agreement with Mitsubishi Corporation (“MC”). As of December 31, 2013, Endesa Costanera has missed US$ 68.5 million in payments, including principal and interest. It has experienced difficulties in making timely payments under its agreement with MC on a recurring basis since the Argentine crisis began in 2002, but had received waivers from MC in the past expressing its willingness to renegotiate payments. Additionally, MC has liens over the Mitsubishi combined cycle power plant at Endesa Costanera.

As of the date of this Report, Endesa Costanera has not received any waivers for the past-due payments or any acceleration notices. We continue with active negotiations aimed at restructuring the debt. If MC were to declare an event of default and accelerate payment of the US$ 185 million principal and interest balance under the supplier credit agreement, all outstanding Endesa Costanera debt (Ch$ 117 billion) would be accelerated and Endesa Costanera would be required to enter into bankruptcy proceedings. For more information, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — B. Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

Our inability to finance new projects or capital expenditures or to refinance our existing debt could adversely affect our results of operation and financial condition.

21

We may not be able to enter into suitable investments, alliances and acquisitions.

On an ongoing basis, we review acquisition prospects that would augment our market coverage or supplement our existing businesses, though there can be no assurance that we will be able to identify and consummate suitable acquisition transactions in the future. The acquisition and integration of independent companies or companies that we do not control is generally a complex, costly and time-consuming process and requires significant efforts and expenditures. If we consummate an acquisition, it could result in the incurrence of substantial debt and assumption of unknown liabilities, the potential loss of key employees from the acquired company, amortization expenses related to tangible assets and the diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns. In addition, any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with acquisitions and the integration of multiple operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Since our generation business depends heavily on hydrological conditions, drought conditions may adversely affect our profitability.

Approximately 55% of our consolidated installed generation capacity in 2013 was hydroelectric. Accordingly, extreme hydrological conditions could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In the last few years, regional hydrology has been affected by two climactic phenomena — El Niño and La Niña — that influence rainfall regularity and may lead to droughts. The effects of El Niño or La Niña can unevenly affect the hydrology of the countries where we operate.

During periods of drought, thermal plants, including our facilities that use natural gas, fuel oil or coal as fuel, are used more frequently. Operating costs of thermal plants can be considerably higher than those of hydroelectric plants. Our operating expenses increase during these periods, and, depending on our commercial obligations, we may have to buy electricity at spot prices in order to meet our contractual supply obligations. The cost of these electricity purchases may exceed the price at which we sell contracted electricity, thus producing losses from those contracts.

Governmental regulations may adversely affect our business

We are subject to extensive regulation of the tariffs we charge our customers and other aspects of our business and these regulations may adversely affect our profitability. For example, the Chilean government can impose electricity rationing during drought conditions or prolonged failures of power facilities. If, during rationing, we are unable to generate enough electricity to comply with our contractual obligations, we may be forced to buy electricity at the spot price, as even a severe drought does not release us from our contractual obligations as aforce majeure event. The spot price may be significantly higher than our costs to generate the electricity and can be as high as the “cost of failure” set by the Chilean National Energy Commission (the “CNE”). This “cost of failure”, which is updated semiannually by the CNE, is a measurement of how much final users would pay for one extra MWh under rationing conditions. If we were unable to buy enough electricity at the spot price to comply with our contractual obligations, then we would have to compensate our regulated customers for the electricity we failed to provide at the rationed price. Rationing periods may occur in the future, and consequently our generation subsidiaries may be required to pay regulatory penalties if they fail to provide adequate service under their contractual obligations. Material rationing policies imposed by regulatory authorities in any of the countries in which we operate could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Governmental authorities may also delay the distribution tariff review process, or tariff adjustments determined by governmental authorities may not be sufficient to pass through our costs (as has been the case with Edesur, our Argentine distribution subsidiary). Similarly, electricity regulations issued by governmental authorities in the countries in which we operate may affect the ability of our generation companies (such as Endesa Costanera and Dock Sud in Argentina) to collect revenues sufficient to offset their operating costs.

The inability of any company in our consolidated group to collect revenues sufficient to cover operating costs may affect the ability of the affected company to operate as a going concern and may otherwise have an adverse effect on our business, assets, financial results and operations.

In addition, changes in the regulatory framework are often submitted to the legislators and administrative authorities in the countries in which we operate and, if approved, could have a material adverse impact on our business. For instance, in 2005 there was a change in the water rights’ law in Chile that requires us to pay for unused water rights.

22

Regulatory authorities may impose fines on our subsidiaries, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our electricity businesses may be subject to regulatory fines for any breach of current regulations, including energy supply failures, in the five countries in which we operate. In Chile, such fines may be imposed for a maximum of 10,000 Annual Tax Units (Unidades Tributarias Anuales) (“UTA”), or Ch$ 4.9 billion, using the UTA and foreign exchange rate as of December 31, 2013. In Peru, fines may be imposed for a maximum of 1,400 Treasury Tax Units (Unidad Impositiva Tributaria) (“UIT”) or Ch$ 972 million using the rates as of December 31, 2013. In Colombia, fines may be imposed for a maximum of 2,000 Minimum Monthly Salaries (Salarios Mínimos Mensuales) or Ch$ 315 million. In Argentina, there is no maximum limit for the fines. In Brazil, fines may be imposed for up to 2.0% of an electricity company’s revenues.

Our electricity generation subsidiaries, supervised by their local regulatory entities, may be subject to these fines in cases where, in the opinion of the regulatory entity, operational failures affecting the regular energy supply to the system are the fault of the company; for instance, when the agents are not coordinated with the system operator. In addition, our subsidiaries may be required to pay fines or to compensate customers if those subsidiaries are unable to deliver electricity, even if such failure is due to forces outside of the subsidiaries’ control.

For example, in 2013, ANEEL imposed fines of Ch$ 6.8 billion on Ampla and Ch$ 8 billion on Coelce due to technical and commercial operation failures. In 2013, ENRE imposed fines on Edesur for a total of Ch$ 4.9 billion. In 2011, the Chilean Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels (Superintendencia de Electricidad y Combustibles) (“SEF”) imposed Ch$ 953 million in fines on Endesa Chile, Pehuenche and Chilectra due to a blackout that occurred in the Santiago metropolitan region in March 2010. For further information on fines, please refer to Note 37 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

We depend in part on payments from our subsidiaries, jointly-controlled entities and associates to meet our payment obligations.

In order to pay our obligations, we rely partly on cash from dividends, loans, interest payments, capital reductions, and other distributions from our subsidiaries and equity affiliates. The ability of our subsidiaries and equity affiliates to pay dividends, interest payments, loans, and other distributions to us is subject to legal constraints such as dividend restrictions, fiduciary duties, contractual limitations, and foreign exchange controls that may be imposed in any of the five countries where they operate.

Historically, we have been able to access the cash flows of our Chilean subsidiaries, but we have not been similarly able to access at all times the cash flows of our non-Chilean operating subsidiaries due to government regulations, strategic considerations, economic conditions, and credit restrictions.

Our future results from operations outside Chile may continue to be subject to greater economic and political uncertainties than what we have experienced in Chile, thereby reducing the likelihood that we will be able to rely on cash flows from operations in those entities to repay our debt.

Dividend Limits and Other Legal Restrictions. Some of our non-Chilean subsidiaries are subject to legal reserve requirements and other restrictions on dividend payments. Other legal restrictions, such as foreign currency controls, may limit the ability of our non-Chilean subsidiaries and equity affiliates to pay dividends and make loan payments or other distributions to us. In addition, the ability of any of our subsidiaries that are not wholly-owned to distribute cash to us may be limited by the fiduciary duties of the directors of such subsidiaries to their minority shareholders. Furthermore, some of our subsidiaries may be forced by local authorities, in accordance with applicable regulation, to diminish or eliminate dividend payments. As a consequence of such restrictions, our subsidiaries could, under certain circumstances, be prevented from distributing cash to us.

Contractual Constraints. Distribution restrictions included in certain credit agreements of our subsidiaries Endesa Costanera, El Chocón and Endesa Fortaleza, may prevent dividends and other distributions to shareholders if they are not in compliance with certain financial ratios. Generally, our credit agreements prohibit any type of distribution if there is an ongoing default.

23

Operating Results of Our Subsidiaries. The ability of our subsidiaries and equity affiliates to pay dividends or make loan payments or other distributions to us is limited by their operating results. To the extent that the cash requirements of any of our subsidiaries exceed their available cash, the subsidiary will not be able to make cash available to us.

Any of the situations described above could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Foreign exchange risks may adversely affect our results, and the U.S. dollar value of dividends payable to ADS holders.

The currencies of South American countries in which we and our subsidiaries operate have been subject to large devaluations and appreciations against the U.S. dollar and may be subject to significant fluctuations in the future. Historically, a significant portion of our consolidated indebtedness has been denominated in U.S. dollars. Although a substantial portion of our operating cash flows is linked to U.S. dollars, we generally have been and will continue to be materially exposed to currency fluctuations of our local currencies against the U.S. dollar because of time lags and other limitations to peg our tariffs to the U.S. dollar.

In countries where operating cash flows are denominated in the local currency, we seek to maintain debt in the same currency, but due to market conditions it may not be possible to do so. The most material example is in Argentina, where most of our debt is denominated in U.S. dollars while our revenues are mostly in Argentine pesos.

Because of this exposure, the cash generated by our subsidiaries can decrease substantially when local currencies devalue against the U.S. dollar. Future volatility in the exchange rate of the currencies in which we receive revenues or incur expenditures may affect our financial condition and results from operations.

As of December 31, 2013, the amount of Enersis’ total consolidated debt was Ch$ 3,697 billion (net of currency hedging instruments). Of this amount, Ch$ 1,309 billion, or 35%, was denominated in U.S. dollars and Ch$ 335 billion in Chilean pesos. As of December 31, 2013, our consolidated foreign currency-denominated indebtedness (other than U.S. dollars or Chilean pesos) included the equivalent of:

• Ch$ 1,233 billion in Colombian pesos;

• Ch$ 551 billion in Brazilian reais;

• Ch$ 222 billion in Peruvian soles; and

• Ch$ 47 billion in Argentine pesos.

These amounts total Ch$ 2,053 billion in currencies other than U.S. dollars or Chilean pesos.

For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2013, our operating cash flows were Ch$ 1,737 billion (before consolidation adjustments) of which:

• Ch$ 479 billion, or 28%, came from Colombia;

• Ch$ 463 billion, or 27%, came from Brazil;

• Ch$ 447 billion, or 26%, came from Chile;

• Ch$ 175 billion, or 10%, came from Peru; and

• Ch$ 173 billion, or 10%, came from Argentina

We are involved in litigation proceedings.

We are currently involved in various litigation proceedings, which could result in unfavorable decisions or financial penalties against us, and we will continue to be subject to future litigation proceedings, which could cause material adverse consequences to our business.

For example, in December 2013, a court granted an injunction in favor of local fishermen ordering a temporary shutdown of our Bocamina II facility. While we are appealing the case, the plant remains shut down and our operating income is reduced between US$ 20 million and US$ 44 million each month the facility is shut down. Our financial condition or results from operations could be adversely affected if we are unsuccessful in defending this litigation or other lawsuits and proceedings against us.

24

The values of our generation subsidiaries’ long-term energy supply contracts are subject to fluctuations in the market prices of certain commodities and other factors.

We have economic exposure to fluctuations in the market prices of certain commodities as a result of the long-term energy sales contracts into which we have entered. We and our subsidiaries have material obligations as selling parties under long-term fixed-price electricity sales contracts. Prices in these contracts are indexed according to different commodities, the exchange rate, inflation, and the market price of electricity. Adverse changes to these indices would reduce the rates we charge under our long-term fixed-price electricity sales contracts, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our controlling shareholders may have conflicts of interest relating to our business.

Enel owns 92.1% of Endesa Spain, which in turn beneficially owns 60.6% of Enersis’ share capital. Our controlling shareholders have the power to determine the outcome of most material matters that require shareholders’ votes, such as the election of the majority of our board members and, subject to contractual and legal restrictions, the distribution of dividends. Our controlling shareholders also can exercise influence over our business strategy and operations. Their interests may in some cases differ from those of the other shareholders. Enel and Endesa Spain conduct their business operations in the field of renewable energies in South America through Enel Green Power S.p.A., in which we do not have an equity interest.

Environmental regulations in the countries in which we operate and other factors may cause delays, impede the development of new projects or increase the costs of operations and capital expenditures.

Our operating subsidiaries are subject to environmental regulations which, among other things, require us to perform environmental impact studies for future projects and obtain permits from both local and national regulators. The approval of these environmental impact studies may take longer than planned and may be withheld by governmental authorities. Local communities and ethnic and environmental activists, among others, may intervene in the approval process to delay or prevent a project’s development. They may also seek injunctive or other relief, which could negatively impact us if they are successful.

Environmental regulations for existing and future generation capacity may become stricter, requiring increased capital investments. For example, Decree 13 of the Chilean Ministry of the Environment promulgated in January 2011, and published in June 2011, defined stricter emission standards for thermoelectric plants that must be met between 2014 and 2016 and stricter standards for new facilities or additional capacity.

In 2009, we presented our 740 MW coal fueled Punta Alcalde project for environmental approval in Chile. In 2012, the regional environmental authority rejected the project. We appealed to the Council of Ministers. Even though the Council unanimously reversed the decision of the environmental authority, the Court of Appeals accepted four injunctions against us in early 2013. Ultimately, the Chilean Supreme Court ruled that the project could proceed in January 2014.

In addition to environmental matters, there are other factors that may adversely affect our ability to build new facilities or to complete projects currently under development on time, including delays in obtaining regulatory approvals, shortages or increases in the price of equipment, materials or labor, strikes, adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, civil unrest, accidents, or other unforeseen events.

Delays or modifications to any proposed project and laws or regulations may change or be interpreted in a manner that could adversely affect our operations or our plans for companies in which we hold investments, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

25

Our business may be adversely affected by judicial decisions on environmental qualification resolutions for electricity projects in Chile.

The environmental qualification resolutions term for electricity generation or transmission projects in Chile has more than doubled, due primarily to judicial decisions against such projects, environmental opposition, social criticism and government delays. This can cast doubt on the ability of a project to obtain such approval, and increase the uncertainty for investing in electricity generation and transmission projects in Chile. The uncertainty is forcing companies to reassess their business strategies as the delay in the construction of electricity generation and transmission projects may result in a supply constraints over the next five or six years. If any plant within the system ceases operation unexpectedly, we could experience supply shortages in our system, which could lead to power cuts.

For example, in August 2008, the HidroAysén environmental impact assessment study was submitted for approval. In May 2011, a favorable environmental qualification resolution was reached. In June 2011, HidroAysén filed an appeal with the Council of Ministers requesting its review of certain conditions established by the environmental authorities. On January 30, 2014, the Council of Ministers met to review the appeals and the majority of them were resolved. The Council of Ministers requested new background information and studies in order for the Council to perform a new evaluation and issue its decision regarding the project.

In March 2014, Chilean President Michelle Bachelet took office and a new Council of Ministers was convened, which repealed the decisions taken in January 2014. The new Council stated it would study the issue again and resolve all claims within the 60 business day timeframe established by law.

Our power plant projects may encounter significant opposition from groups that may ultimately damage our reputation and could result in impairment of goodwill with stakeholders.

Our reputation is the foundation of our relationship with key stakeholders and other constituencies. If we are unable to effectively manage real or perceived issues, which could negatively impact sentiments toward us, our ability to operate could be impaired and our financial results could suffer.

The development of new power plants may face opposition from several stakeholders, such as ethnic groups, environmental groups, land owners, farmers, local communities and political parties, among others, all of which may impact the sponsoring company’s reputation and goodwill. For example, our HidroAysén project has encountered substantial opposition by environmental activists. Such groups are sometimes financed internationally and may receive global attention. Similarly, the El Quimbo hydroelectric project in Colombia faced constant social demands that have delayed construction and increased costs. Between August 16, 2013 and September 9, 2013, a national agricultural strike involving communities near the project blocked roads and occupied neighboring lands.

The operation of our current thermal power plants may also affect our goodwill with stakeholders, due to emissions such as particulate matter, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, which could adversely affect the environment.

Damage to our reputation may exert considerable pressure on regulators, creditors, and other stakeholders, and ultimately lead to projects and operations that may not be optimal, cause our share prices to drop and hinder our ability to attract or retain valuable employees, all of which could result in an impairment of goodwill with stakeholders.

26

Our business may experience adverse consequences if we are unable to reach satisfactory collective bargaining agreements with our unionized employees.

A large percentage of our employees are members of unions and have collective bargaining agreements that must be renewed on a regular basis. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by a failure to reach agreement with any labor union representing such employees or by an agreement with a labor union that contains terms we view as unfavorable. The laws of many of the countries in which we operate provide legal mechanisms for judicial authorities to impose a collective agreement if the parties are unable to come to an agreement, which may increase our costs beyond what we have budgeted.

In addition, we employ many highly-specialized employees, and certain actions such as strikes, walk-outs or work stoppages by these employees could negatively impact our operating and financial performance, as well as our reputation.

Interruption or failure of our information technology and communications systems or external attacks to or invasions of these systems could have an adverse effect on our operations and results.

We depend on information technology, communication and processing systems (“IT Systems”) to operate our businesses, the failure of which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

IT Systems are all vital to our generation subsidiaries’ ability to monitor our power plants’ operations, maintain generation and network performance, adequately generate invoices to customers, achieve operating efficiencies and meet our service targets and standards. Our distribution subsidiaries could also be affected adversely since they rely heavily on IT systems to monitor their grids, billing processes for millions of customers and customer service platforms, among others. Temporary or long-lasting operational failures of any of these IT Systems could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Additionally, cyber attacks can have an adverse effect on the company’s image and its relationship with the community.

In the last few years, global cyber attacks on security systems, treasury operations, and IT Systems have intensified. We are exposed to cyber-terrorist attacks aimed at damaging our assets through computer networks, cyber spying involving strategic information that may be beneficial for third parties and cyber-theft of proprietary and confidential information, including information of our customers. During 2013, we suffered a cyber attack organized by a group known as “Operation Green Rights” to protest the construction of proposed hydroelectric power plants in the Chilean Patagonia as well as other cyber attacks related to the operation of thermal power plants in the north and south of Chile.

We rely on electricity transmission facilities that we do not own or control. If these facilities do not provide us with an adequate transmission service, we may not be able to deliver the power we sell to our final customers.

We depend on transmission facilities owned and operated by other unaffiliated power companies to deliver the electricity we sell. This dependence exposes us to several risks. If transmission is disrupted, or transmission capacity is inadequate, we may be unable to sell and deliver our electricity. If a region’s power transmission infrastructure is inadequate, our recovery of sales costs and profits may be insufficient. If restrictive transmission price regulation is imposed, transmission companies upon whom we rely may not have sufficient incentives to invest in expansion of their transmission infrastructure, which could adversely affect our operations and financial results. On February 27, 2010, due to the 8.8 magnitude earthquake on the Richter scale in Chile, Transelec, a transmission company unrelated to us, experienced damage to its high voltage transmission network that prevented us from delivering our electricity to final consumers.

On September 24, 2011, nearly 10 million people located in central Chile experienced a blackout (affecting more than half of all Chileans), due to the failure of Transelec’s 220 kV Ancoa substation. The failure led to the disruption of two 500 kV transmission lines in the SIC (the Chilean Central Interconnected System) and the subsequent failure of the remote recovery computer software used by CDEC to operate the grid. This blackout, which lasted two hours, exposed weaknesses in the transmission grid and its need for expansion and technological improvements to increase the reliability of the transmission grid. Any such failure could interrupt our business, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

27

The relative illiquidity and volatility of Chilean securities markets could adversely affect the price of our common stock and ADS.

Chilean securities markets are substantially smaller and less liquid than the major securities markets in the United States. In addition, Chilean securities markets may be affected materially by developments in other emerging markets. The low liquidity of the Chilean market may impair the ability of holders of ADS to sell shares of our common stock withdrawn from the ADS program into the Chilean market in the amount and at the price and time they wish to do so.

Lawsuits against us brought outside of the South American countries in which we operate or complaints against us based on foreign legal concepts may be unsuccessful.

All of our assets are located outside of the United States. All of our directors and all of our officers reside outside of the United States and most of their assets are located outside the United States as well. If any investor were to bring a lawsuit against our directors, officers, or experts in the United States, it may be difficult for them to effect service of legal process within the United States upon these persons or to enforce against them, in United States or Chilean courts, judgments obtained in United States courts based upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States. In addition, there is doubt as to whether an action could be brought successfully in Chile on the basis of liability based solely upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws.

Item 4. Information on the Company

A.     History and Development of the Company.

History

Enersis S.A. (“Enersis”) is a publicly held limited liability stock corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Chile. The existence of our company under its current name dates back to August 1, 1988.

The Company’s contact information in Chile is:

Street Address:	Santa Rosa 76, Santiago, Código Postal 8330099, Chile
Telephone:	(56-2) 2353-4639
Web site:	www.enersis.cl

The Company’s authorized representative in the United States of America is Puglisi & Associates, whose contact information is:

Street Address:	850 Library Avenue, Suite 204, Newark, Delaware 19711
Telephone:	1 (302) 738-6680

We are an electricity utility company engaged, through our subsidiaries and affiliates, in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity businesses in Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Peru.

We are one of the largest publicly listed companies in the electricity sector in South America. We trace our origins to Compañía Chilena de Electricidad Ltda. (“CCE”), which was formed in 1921 as a result of the merger of Chilean Electric Tramway and Light Co., founded in 1889, and Compañía Nacional de Fuerza Eléctrica (“CONAFE”), with operations dating back to 1919. In 1970, the Chilean government nationalized CCE. During the 1980s, the sector was reorganized through the Chilean Electricity Law, known as the Decree with Force of Law Number 1 (“DFL 1”), CCE’s operations were divided into one generation company, the current AES Gener S.A. (“Gener”), a currently unrelated company, and two distribution companies, one with a concession in the Valparaíso

28

Region, the current Chilquinta S.A., a currently unrelated company, and the other with a concession in the Santiago metropolitan region, Compañía Chilena Metropolitana de Distribución Eléctrica S.A. From 1982 to 1987, the Chilean electric utility sector went through a process of re-privatization. In August 1988, Compañía Chilena Metropolitana de Distribución Eléctrica S.A. changed its name to Enersis S.A. and became the new parent company of Distribuidora Chilectra Metropolitana S.A., later renamed Chilectra S.A. In the 1990s, we diversified into electricity generation and transmission through our increasing equity stakes in Endesa Chile.

We began our international operations in 1992 with our investment in Edesur, an Argentine electricity distribution company. That same year, Endesa Chile, which at that time was an affiliated company, also started its international operations with its investment in Endesa Costanera, an electricity generation company. We then expanded primarily into electricity generation, transmission and distribution businesses in four South American countries: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Peru. We remain focused on the electricity sector, although we have small operations in other businesses that represent less than 1.0% of our consolidated assets, in the aggregate.

In 2005, Endesa Brasil was formed as a company to manage all generation, transmission and distribution assets that Endesa Latinoamérica, S.A.U., (“Endesa Latinoamérica”,) (a subsidiary of Endesa Spain formerly known as Endesa Internacional), Enersis, Endesa Chile and Chilectra held in Brazil; namely, through Ampla, Endesa Fortaleza, CIEN, Cachoeira Dourada and Coelce. As of December 31, 2013, Enersis had a 83.5% beneficial economic interest in Endesa Brasil.

In order to achieve synergies in Peru, in 2006, Edegel and Etevensa (60% of which was owned by Endesa Spain at the time) merged, creating a 457 MW thermoelectric generation company .

In September 2007, we merged our generation subsidiaries in Colombia to form Emgesa. As of December 31, 2013, Enersis had a 37.7% beneficial economic interest in Emgesa. Pursuant to the terms of a shareholders’ agreement, we control and therefore consolidate Emgesa through Endesa Chile.

In February 2009, Codensa, our Colombian distribution subsidiary, acquired approximately 49% of DECSA, an investment vehicle. The remaining 51% was acquired by Empresa de Energía de Bogotá (“EEB”). Codensa and EEB jointly control DECSA. In March 2009, DECSA acquired 82.3% of Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. (“EEC”), a formerly state-owned company that was privatized that year. EEC is a Colombian company primarily engaged in trading of electricity in Cundinamarca province.

Since June 2009, Enel has ultimately controlled Enersis by virtue of its 92.1% equity interest in Endesa Spain. Endesa Spain beneficially owns 60.6% of the share capital of Enersis. Enel publicly trades on the Milan Stock Exchange, is headquartered in Italy and primarily engaged in the energy sector, with a presence in 40 countries worldwide, and approximately 99 GW of net installed capacity. It provides service to more than 61 million customers through its electricity and gas businesses.

In October 2009, Endesa Chile purchased an additional 29.4% of Edegel from Generalima, a Peruvian indirect subsidiary of Endesa Spain. With this transaction, Endesa Chile increased its economic interest in Edegel from 33.1% to 62.5% and in turn, our economic interest at the Enersis level increased to 37.5%. In the same month, we acquired additional share capital of our Peruvian subsidiary, Edelnor, increasing our direct and indirect ownership stake in Edelnor to 75.5%.

In March 2012, Endesa Latinoamérica announced a public offer to purchase the remaining shares representing 0.36% of the capital of Ampla and Ampla Investimentos e Serviços S.A. (“Ampla Investimentos”), from the minority shareholders. As a result of the public offer to purchase, Endesa Latinoamérica acquired 10,354,610 shares of Ampla, representing 0.0003% of its share capital and 361,569 shares of Ampla Investimentos, representing 0.003% of its share capital. The delisting of the securities of Ampla Investimentos was completed on May 25, 2012. In March 2013, as part of the 2013 capital increase, Endesa Latinoamérica contributed its interests in Ampla and Ampla Investmentos to Enersis.

29

In June 2012, Endesa Spain proposed a capital increase in which it would carry out an in-kind contribution (the “In-Kind Contribution”) of all of its equity interests in 25 companies in the five South American countries in which Enersis operates. The rest of the shareholders would contribute their proportional participation in cash. The capital increase would involve 16,441,606,297 common shares to be issued at a subscription price of Ch$ 173 per common share (or the net dollar equivalent of Ch$ 8,650 per ADS) during the preemptive rights period. The value of Endesa Spain’s In-Kind Contribution would be US$ 3,615 million for which it would receive 9,967,630,058 common shares. The capital increase was approved by the shareholders at an Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting (“ESM”) held on December 20, 2012.

In February 2013, Enersis began preemptive rights offerings in Chile, the United States and Spain, in which shareholders (including Endesa Spain) subscribed for an aggregate of 99% of the capital increase by the expiration of the rights offering on March 26, 2013. On March 28, 2013, the remaining 1% was auctioned off in the Santiago Stock Exchange at Ch$ 182.3 per common share, 5.4% higher than the rights offering subscription price. The total US$ 6 billion capital increase consisted of approximately US$ 3.6 billion of In-Kind Contribution from Endesa Spain and US$ 2.4 billion in cash from minority shareholders. We began consolidating the companies contributed pursuant to the In-Kind Contribution on April 1, 2013.

In January 2014, as part of its initial use of proceeds from the capital increase, Enersis, launched a voluntary public offer for the shares of Coelce it did not already own, which ended on February 17, 2014. As a result, Enersis increased its economic interest in Coelce from 49.2% to 64.3%. For further detail, please see “Item 4. Information on the Company – Recent Developments”.

As of December 31, 2013, we had 15,848 MW of installed capacity with 199 power units in the five countries in which we operate, 14.2 million distribution customers covering approximately 50 million inhabitants, consolidated assets of Ch$ 15,178 billion and operating revenues of Ch$ 6,264 billion.

Capital Investments, Capital Expenditures and Divestitures

We coordinate our overall financing strategy including the terms and conditions of loans or intercompany advances entered into by our subsidiaries, in order to optimize debt and liquidity management. Our operating subsidiaries generally independently plan capital expenditures financed by internally generated funds or with direct financing. One of our goals is to focus on investments that will provide long-term benefits, such as energy loss reduction projects. Additionally, by focusing on Enersis as a group, and seeking to provide services groupwide, we aim to reduce investments at the individual subsidiary level in items such as procurement, telecommunication and information systems. Although we have considered how these investments will be financed as part of the Company’s budget process, we have not committed to any particular financing structure. Our investments will depend on the prevailing market conditions at the time the cash flows are needed.

Our investment plan is flexible enough to adapt to changing circumstances by giving different priorities to each project in accordance with its profitability and strategic fit. Our current investment priorities include developing new, environmentally responsible hydroelectric and thermal projects in Chile and Colombia in order to guarantee adequate levels of reliable supply.

From 2014 through 2018, we expect to make capital expenditures of Ch$ 4,609 billion on a consolidated basis in our controlled subsidiaries, related to investments currently in progress, maintenance of our distribution network, maintenance of existing generation plants, and studies required to develop other potential generation projects. For further detail regarding these projects, please see “Item 4. Information on the Company — D. Property, Plant and Equipment — Projects Under Development”.

30

The table below sets forth the expected capital expenditures from 2014 through 2018 and the capital expenditures incurred by our subsidiaries in 2013, 2012 and 2011:

	Capital Expenditures (1)
	2014-2018		2013 (1)		2012 (1)		2011 (1)
	(in millions of Ch$)
Chile		1,259,408		128,240		125,601		145,758
Abroad		3,349,610		646,580		581,690		527,915
Total		4,609,018		774,820		707,291		673,673

(1) CAPEX figures represent actual payments for each year net of contributions, except for future projections.

Capital Expenditures 2013, 2012 and 2011

Our capital expenditures in the last three years were related principally to the 350 MW Bocamina II project in Chile and the 400 MW El Quimbo project in Colombia. Bocamina II began commercial operations in October 2012, with 350 MW of installed capacity. The El Quimbo project is still under construction. In July 2013, the “Reserva Fría” plant, a 183 MW gas turbine that serves as a backup for Peruvian system, began its operation in the Talara region. In November 2013, the first of the Salaco project’s hydro plants began its operation in Colombia. The project will add 144 MW of capacity to the system when completed. In addition, we also invested to: (i) expand distribution services in response to increasing demand for energy, (ii) improve service quality, (iii) improve safety and (iv) reduce energy losses, especially in Brazil.

For additional information regarding Bocamina II, which currently is not operating due to an environmental restriction, please see “Introduction — Recent Developments”.

Investments Currently in Progress

Our material plans in progress include completion of the El Quimbo project, which is expected to be finished by July 2015 and will add 400 MW of capacity to our Colombian operations. El Quimbo is being constructed in response to increased demand in that market. Additionally, we plan to continue to expand distribution services, reduce energy losses, and in turn, improve the efficiency and the profitability of our distribution operations, in Chile and abroad.

In general terms, projects in progress are expected to be financed with external and internal funds for each of the projects described.

B.     Business Overview.

We are a publicly held limited liability stock corporation with consolidated operations in Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Peru. Our core businesses are electricity generation, transmission and distribution. We also participate in other activities which are not part of our core business. Since these non-core activities represent less than 1% of our 2013 revenues, we do not report them as a separate business for purposes of this discussion, or under IFRS.

31

The table below presents our revenues by business segment.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011		Change 2013 vs. 2012
	(in millions of Ch$)						(in %)
Generation and Transmission Business
Endesa Chile and subsidiaries (Chile) (1)		955,702		1,104,776		1,135,176		(13.5)
Endesa Costanera (Argentina)		94,888		295,140		341,824		(67.8)
El Chocón (Argentina)		36,687		49,193		48,341		(25.4)
Cachoeira Dourada (Brazil)		117,445		155,195		126,646		(24.3)
Endesa Fortaleza (Brazil)		168,871		139,186		129,485		21.3
CIEN (Brazil)		67,689		72,523		59,918		(6.7)
Emgesa (Colombia)		639,503		580,125		498,569		10.2
Edegel (Peru)		283,806		282,124		239,842		0.6
Cemsa (Argentina)		1,591		—		—		n.a
Dock Sud (Argentina)		41,186		—		—		n.a
EEPSA (Peru)		33,752		—		—		n.a.
Total		2,441,120		2,678,262		2,579,801		(8.9)
Distribution Business
Chilectra and subsidiaries (Chile)		975,024		984,738		1,046,191		(1.0)
Edesur (Argentina)		528,653		321,242		279,725		64.6
Edelnor (Peru)		413,911		385,014		329,309		7.5
Ampla (Brazil)		945,131		1,074,237		1,117,269		(12.0)
Coelce (Brazil)		688,981		806,428		859,446		(14.6)
Codensa (Colombia) (1)		852,780		851,622		783,050		0.1
Total		4,404,480		4,423,281		4,414,990		(0.4)
Less: Consolidation adjustments and non-core activities		(581,154)		(605,590)		(608,191)		(4.0)
Total		6,264,446		6,495,953		6,386,600		(3.6)

(1) Restated in accordance with IFRS 11.

For further information related to operating revenues and total income by business segment, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — A. Operating Results” and Note 34.2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Electricity Generation Business Segment

As of December 31, 2013, electricity generation represented 36% of our operating revenues and 64% of our operating income before consolidation adjustments.

Operating and financial data presented in this Report differs from those previously reported, due to:

• application of IFRS 11, “Joint Arrangements” pursuant to which jointly controlled companies as of January 1, 2013 are now recorded using the equity method. Until December 31, 2012, they were consolidated using the proportionate consolidation method. With respect to our generation business, the application of IFRS 11 requires us to exclude GasAtacama figures from 2012 and 2011; and

• changes to what we define as “electricity generation”, which we now define as total generation output minus (i) the electricity consumed by the facilities themselves, (ii) consumption by external auxiliary facilities, (iii) losses in transmission and (iv) technical losses, which definition is uniformly applied to all countries. We have recalculated the operating data for 2009 through 2012, however we believe the differences in calculation methods are not material. Our

32

consolidated installed capacity as of December 31, 2013 was 15,846 MW, of which 54.8% was hydroelectric capacity, 44.7% was thermal electric and 0.5% was wind power generation capacity. Total installed capacity is defined as the maximum power capacity (measured in MW generation units) under specific technical conditions and characteristics.

• Consolidation of companies contributed by Endesa Spain as part of our capital increase, as of April 1, 2013. This only impacts 2013 and has no effect on prior years presented.

Our consolidated electricity sales for 2013 were 69,369 GWh and our production was 60,089 GWh, 5.2% and 4.7% higher than in 2012, respectively. Since April 2013, Enersis also consolidates Dock Sud in Argentina and EEPSA in Peru, which were contributed as part of our capital increase as of April 1, 2013, partly explaining the increases in 2013 when compared with 2012.

Our total installed capacity in 2013 was 15,846 MW, 1,065 MW higher than in December 31, 2012, due to the following changes: the incorporation of 869 MW of Dock Sud and 302 MW of EEPSA, 50 MW increase in Emgesa’s Darío Valencia 2 unit; 4.2 MW increase in Edegel’s Matucana unit, partially offset by the decommissioning of Edegel’s 121 MW Santa Rosa TG 7 unit, and Emgesa’s 39 MW La Tinta and La Junca. Our electricity generation business is conducted primarily through Endesa Chile, which has consolidated operations in Chile, Colombia, Peru and Argentina. We also have separate consolidated operations in Brazil through Endesa Brasil, in Argentina through Dock Sud and in Peru through EEPSA.

33

The following tables summarize the information relating to Enersis’ electricity generation:

ENERSIS ELECTRICITY DATA PER COUNTRY

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
Chile (1)
Number of generating units (2) (3)		105		105		104
Installed capacity (MW) (3) (4)		5,571		5,571		5,221
Electricity generation (GWh) (5)		19,438		19,194		19,296
Energy sales (GWh)		20,406		20,878		20,315
Argentina (6)
Number of generating units (2)		25		20		20
Installed capacity (MW) (4)		4,522		3,652		3,652
Electricity generation (GWh) (5)		14,422		11,207		10,713
Energy sales (GWh)		16,549		11,852		11,381
Brazil
Number of generating units (2)		13		13		13
Installed capacity (MW) (4)		987		987		987
Electricity generation (GWh) (5)		4,992		5,183		4,129
Energy sales (GWh)		6,826		7,291		6,828
Colombia
Number of generating units (2) (3)		29		30		30
Installed capacity (MW) (3) (4)		2,925		2,914		2,914
Electricity generation (GWh) (5)		12,748		13,251		12,051
Energy sales (GWh)		16,090		16,304		15,112
Peru (7)
Number of generating units (2)		27		25		25
Installed capacity (MW) (3)(4)		1,842		1,657		1,668
Electricity generation (GWh) (5)		8,489		8,570		8,980
Energy sales (GWh)		9,497		9,587		9,450
Total
Number of generating units (2)		199		193		192
Installed capacity (MW) (4)		15,846		14,781		14,442
Electricity generation (GWh) (5)		60,089		57,405		55,169
Energy sales (GWh)		69,369		65,913		63,086

(1) Excludes GasAtacama, which was included in previous reports.

(2) For details on generation facilities, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — D. Property, Plant and Equipment — Property, Plant and Equipment of Generating Companies”.

(3) The Bocamina II TV2 generation unit in Chile has been consolidated since April 2012; the Darío Valencia hydro plant in Colombia has been consolidated since November 2013 and Unit 2 of Matucana hydro plant in Peru increased its installed capacity in June 2013. In October 2013, La Junca and La Tinta Unit 5, both mini hydro plants in Colombia, and the TG 7 unit of Santa Rosa in Peru, were decommissioned.

(4) Total installed capacity is defined as the maximum MW capacity in generation units, under specific technical conditions and characteristics. In most cases installed capacity is confirmed by satisfaction guarantee tests performed by equipment suppliers. Figures may differ from installed capacity declared to governmental authorities and customers in each country, according to criteria defined by such authorities and relevant contracts.

(5) Figures may differ from those previously reported, as the current figures are shown net of all losses.

(6) The 2013 data for Argentina includes the data of subsidiaries of Endesa Chile in Argentina (Endesa Costanera and El Chocón) and, since April 1, 2013, Dock Sud, which became a subsidiary in connection with our capital increase.

(7) The 2013 data for Peru includes the data of a subsidiary of Endesa Chile in Peru (Edegel) and, since April 1, 2013, EEPSA, which became a subsidiary in connection with our capital increase.

34

In the electricity industry, it is common to segment the business into hydroelectric and thermoelectric generation, because each type of generation has significantly different variable costs. Thermoelectric generation requires the purchase of fuel, thereby leading to high variable costs as compared with hydro generation from reservoirs or rivers with no marginal costs. Of our total consolidated generation in 2013, 51.4% was from hydroelectric sources, 48.4% came from thermal sources, and wind energy represented less than 1%.

The following table summarizes Enersis’ consolidated generation by type of energy:

ENERSIS CONSOLIDATED GENERATION BY TYPE OF ENERGY (GWh) (1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012 (3)				2011 (3)
	Generation		%		Generation		%		Generation		%
Hydroelectric		30,869		51.4		34,499		60.1		33,325		60.4
Thermal (2)		29,076		48.4		22,752		39.6		21,712		39.4
Other generation (3)		145		0.2		153		0.3		132		0.2
Total generation		60,089		100.0		57,405		100.0		55,169		100.0

(1) Figures may differ from those previously reported, as the current figures are shown net of all losses.

(2) Excludes GasAtacama, which was included in previous reports.

(3) Other generation refers to the generation from the Canela and Canela II wind farms.

In the countries in which we operate, the potential for contracting electricity is generally related to electricity demand. Customers identified as small volume regulated customers, such as residential customers subject to government regulated electricity tariffs, must purchase electricity directly from a distribution company. These distribution companies, which purchase large amounts of electricity for small volume residential customers, generally enter into contractual agreements with generators at a regulated tariff price. Those identified as large volume industrial customers also enter into contractual agreements with energy suppliers. However, such large volume industrial customers are not subject to the regulated tariff price. Instead, these customers are allowed to negotiate the price of energy with generators based on the characteristics of the service required. Finally, the pool market, where energy is normally sold at the spot price, is not carried out through contracted pricing.

The following table contains information regarding Enersis’ consolidated sales of electricity by type of customer for each of the periods indicated:

ENERSIS CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICITY SALES BY CUSTOMER TYPE (GWh) (1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Sales		%		Sales		%		Sales		%
Regulated customers		32,140		46.3		32,679		49.6		30,226		47.9
Unregulated customers		15,178		21.9		16,745		25.4		15,590		24.7
Total contracted sales (2)		47,318		68.2		49,425		75.0		45,816		72.6
Electricity pool market sales		22,051		31.8		16,488		25.0		17,270		27.4
Total electricity sales		69,369		100.0		65,913		100.0		63,086		100.0

(1) Excludes GasAtacama, which was included in previous reports.

(2) Includes sales to distribution companies not backed by contracts in Chile and Peru.

The specific energy consumption limit (measured in GWh) for regulated and unregulated customers is country specific. Moreover, regulatory frameworks often require that regulated distribution companies have contracts to support their commitments to small volume customers and also determine which customers can purchase energy in electricity pool markets.

35

In terms of expenses, the primary variable costs involved in the electricity generation business, in addition to the direct variable cost of generating hydroelectric or thermal electricity such as fuel costs, are energy purchases and transportation costs. During periods of relatively low rainfall conditions, the amount of our thermal generation increases. This not only involves increasing the total cost of fuel but also the cost of transporting that fuel to the thermal generation power plants. Under drought conditions, electricity that we have contractually agreed to provide may exceed the amount of electricity that we are able to generate, requiring us to purchase electricity in the pool market at at spot prices in order to satisfy our contractual commitments. The cost of these purchases at spot prices may, under certain circumstances, exceed the price at which we sell electricity under contracts and result in a loss. We attempt to minimize the effect of poor hydrological conditions on our operations in any year primarily by limiting contractual sales requirements to an amount that does not exceed the estimated production in a “dry year”. In determining estimated production in a dry year, we take into account the available statistical information concerning rainfall and water flows, and the capacity of key reservoirs. In addition to limiting contracted sales, we may adopt other strategies such as installing temporary thermal capacity, negotiating lower consumption levels with unregulated customers, negotiating with other water users and including pass-through cost clauses in contracts with customers.

Operations in Chile

We own and operate a total of 105 generation units in Chile directly and through our subsidiaries Pehuenche, and Celta. Of these generation facilities, 38 are hydroelectric, with a total installed capacity of 3,465 MW. This represents 62.2% of our total installed capacity in Chile. There are 16 thermal units that operate with gas, coal or oil with a total installed capacity of 2,028 MW, representing 36.4% of our total installed capacity in Chile. There are 51 wind power units with 78 MW in the aggregate, representing 1.4% of our total installed capacity in Chile. All of our generation units are connected to the country’s Central Interconnected Electricity Systems (Sistema Interconectado Central) (“SIC”), except for two Celta thermoelectric units which are connected to the Sistema Interconectado del Norte Grande (“SING”) in the north.

For information on the installed generation capacity for each of the Company’s Chilean subsidiaries, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — D. Property, Plant and Equipment”.

Our total electricity generation in Chile (including the SIC and the SING) accounted for 29.4% of total gross electricity production in Chile during 2013.

The following table sets forth the electricity generation for each of our Chilean generation subsidiaries:

ELECTRICITY GENERATION BY SUBSIDIARY IN CHILE (GWh) (1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
Endesa		11,967		11,723		11,076
Pehuenche		2,565		2,615		2,975
Pangue (2)		—		325		1,713
San Isidro (2)		2,546		3,529		2,460
Celta (2)		1,564		798		899
Endesa Eco (2)		796		204		173
Total		19,438		19,194		19,296

(1) Figures may differ from those previously reported, as the current figures are shown net of all losses.

(2) The electricity generation difference from 2011 to 2012 was primarily due to the incorporation of Pangue’s electricity generation into San Isidro’s from May 1, 2012 following the merger of the two entities. The electricity generation difference from 2012 to 2013 was primarily due to the incorporation of San Isidro’s electricity generation into Endesa Eco from September 1, 2013 following the merger of the two entities, and the further consolidation into Endesa Eco following its merger with Celta on November 1, 2013.

36

The potential energy in Chilean reservoirs reached 2,870 GWh in 2013, an increase of 480 GWh, or 20%, compared to 2,391 GWh in 2012 and 3,844GWh in 2011.

Generation by type in Chile is shown in the following table:

ELECTRICITY GENERATION BY TYPE IN CHILE (GWh) (1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Generation		%		Generation		%		Generation		%
Hydroelectric generation		9,617		49.5		10,578		56.5		11,403		59.1
Thermal generation (2)		9,404		48.4		8,188		42.7		7,497		38.9
Wind generation – NCRE (3)		145		0.7		153		0.8		132		0.7
Mini-hydro generation – NCRE (4)		272		1.4		275		1.4		264		1.4
Total generation		19,438		100.0		19,194		100.0		19,296		100.0

(1) Figures may differ from those previously reported, as the current figures are shown net of all losses.

(2) Excludes GasAtacama, which was included in previous reports.

(3) Refers to the generation of the Canela and Canela II wind farms.

(4) Refers to the generation of Palmucho and the Ojos de Agua mini-hydroelectric plants.

Our thermal electric generation facilities use natural gas, LNG, coal or oil as fuel. In order to satisfy our natural gas and transportation requirements, we enter into long-term gas contracts with suppliers who establish maximum supply amounts and prices and long-term gas transportation agreements with the pipeline companies. We currently use Gas Andes (which is not related to us) and Electrogas (an Endesa Chile related company) as our suppliers. Since March 2008, all of our natural gas units can operate using natural gas or diesel, and since December 2009, San Isidro, San Isidro 2 and Quintero can operate using LNG.

In July 2013, Endesa Chile and British Gas successfully ended a renegotiation of its LNG sale and purchase agreement. This renegotiation modified some conditions of the original contract, allowing Endesa Chile to secure its long term LNG supply at competitive prices, with significant flexibility and new capacity sufficient for its current power plants and future projects.

Endesa Chile also exercised a priority option to purchase capacity as part of an expansion at the Quintero LNG Terminal. This will allow us to increase our regasification capacity from 3.2 million cubic meters per day to 5.4 million cubic meters per day, starting late 2014. This expansion will allow our Quintero facility to bring additional thermal electricity generation online, expand our gas commercialization business and develop new power plants. Because Chile has experienced prolonged droughts, we believe LNG is becoming a strategic business for us and for Chile.

In 2013, we signed a new 1,600 kiloton coal supply agreement with Endesa Energía S.A.U., which we believe is sufficient to supply Tarapacá and Bocamina with coal through until December 2014.

Under Chilean law, power generation companies must demonstrate that certain minimum amounts of their energy sales come from non-conventional renewable sources, known as NCRE. Currently our Canela wind farm, Ojos de Agua mini-hydroelectric plant and 40% of the installed capacity of our Palmucho mini-hydroelectric plant qualify as NCRE facilities. We fully complied with this obligation during 2013. The additional cost of generating electricity using NCRE facilities is being charged as a pass-through in our new contracts, which mitigates the impact to our operating income.

37

Electricity sales industry-wide in Chile increased 3.5% during 2013, with sales in the SIC increasing by 3.3% and in the SING by 3.8%, as detailed in the following table:

ELECTRICITY SALES PER SYSTEM IN CHILE (GWh) (1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
Electricity sales in the SIC		47,831		46,282		43,805
Electricity sales in the SING		15,399		14,831		14,263
Total electricity sales		63,230		61,113		58,068

(1) Figures may differ from those previously reported as a result of their update in the CDEC-SIC and CDEC-SING yearly reports.

Our electricity sales in Chile reached 20,406 GWh in 2013 and 20,878 GWh in 2012, which represented a 32.3% and 34.2% market share, respectively. The percentage of the energy purchases to satisfy our contractual obligations to third parties has decreased from 7.8% in 2012 to 4.7% in 2013 as a result of the increase in our generation.

The following table sets forth our electricity generation and purchases in Chile:

ELECTRICITY GENERATION AND PURCHASES IN CHILE (GWh) (1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012 (2)				2011 (2)
	(GWh)		%   of Volume		(GWh)		%   of Volume		(GWh)		%   of Volume
Electricity generation (2)		19,438		95.3		19,194		91.9		19,296		95.0
Electricity purchases		968		4.7		1,684		8.1		1,019		5.0
Total (1)		20,406		100.0		20,878		100.0		20,315		100.0

(1) Excludes GasAtacama, which was included in previous reports.

(2) Figures may differ from those previously reported, as the current figures are shown net of all losses.

We supply electricity to the major regulated electricity distribution companies, large unregulated industrial firms (primarily in the mining, pulp and steel sectors) and the pool market. Commercial relationships with our customers are usually governed by contracts. Supply contracts with distribution companies must be auctioned, are generally standardized and have an average term of ten years.

Supply contracts with unregulated customers (large industrial customers) are specific to the needs of each customer and the conditions are agreed between both parties, reflecting competitive market conditions.

In 2013, 2012 and 2011, Endesa Chile had 50, 49 and 47 customers, respectively. In 2013, our customers included 21 distribution companies in the SIC and 29 unregulated customers.

38

The following table sets forth information regarding our sales of electricity in Chile by type of customer:

ELECTRICITY SALES PER CUSTOMER SEGMENT IN CHILE (GWh) (1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Sales		% of Sales   Volume		Sales		% of Sales   Volume		Sales		% of Sales   Volume
Regulated customers		14,796		72.5		13,971		66.9		12,700		62.5
Unregulated customers		4,185		20.5		5,996		28.7		5,798		28.5
Total contract sales		18,981		93.0		19,967		95.6		18,498		91.1
Electricity pool market sales		1,425		7.0		911		4.4		1,817		8.9
Total electricity sales		20,406		100.0		20,878		100.0		20,315		100.0

(1) Excludes GasAtacama, which was included in previous reports.

Our most significant supply contracts with regulated customers are with Chilectra S.A. (Chilectra, subsidiary of Enersis) and with Compañía General de Electricidad S.A. (“CGE”), which is not related to us. These are the two largest distribution companies in Chile in terms of sales.

The following table sets forth Endesa Chile’s public contracts with electricity distribution companies in the SIC for their regulated customers:

	Year ended December 31,
							(in GWh)
Company	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022	2023	2024	2025	2026	2027
Chilectra	7,160	7,393	7,375	7,528	7,621	7,624	7,624	6,574	4,874	3,524	3,524	2,850	1,350	1,350
CGE	4,964	5,953	6,258	6,119	6,034	6,078	5,201	5,201	3,801	3,801	3,801	0	0	0
Chilquinta	1,331	1,637	1,639	1,701	1,742	1,755	1,755	1,755	1,755	1,755	1,095	350	350	0
Saesa	2,540	2,524	2,266	2,190	2,140	2,081	581	581	581	581	581	0	0	0
Total Endesa Chile	15,996	17,507	17,538	17,538	17,538	17,538	15,161	14,111	11,011	9,661	9,001	3,200	1,700	1,350

For 2013, 2012 and 2011, Endesa Chile and its Chilean subsidiaries held 46%, 46% and 45% respectively of the total publicly tendered supply regulated contracts with the distribution companies in the SIC for their regulated customers. The rest of the contracts are distributed among eight companies.

Our generation contracts with unregulated customers are generally on a long-term basis and typically range from five to fifteen years. Such contracts are usually automatically extended at the end of the applicable term, unless terminated by either party upon prior notice. Some of them include a price adjustment mechanism in the case of high marginal costs, which also reduces the hydrological risk. Contracts with unregulated customers may also include specifications regarding power sources and equipment, which may be provided at special rates, as well as provisions for technical assistance to the customer. We have not experienced any supply interruptions under our contracts. If we experience aforce majeure event, as contractually defined, we are allowed to reject purchases and we are not required to supply electricity to our unregulated customers. Disputes are typically subject to binding arbitration between the parties, subject to limited exceptions.

39

The following table sets forth our sales by volume to our five largest distribution and unregulated customers in Chile for each of the periods indicated:

MAIN CUSTOMERS IN CHILE (GWh) (1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Sales		% of Sales   Volume		Sales		% of Sales   Volume		Sales		% of Sales   Volume
Distribution companies:
Chilectra		5,296		27.9		5,008		24.0		4,679		22.4
CGE		4,208		22.2		4,152		19.9		3,887		18.6
Chilquinta		1,588		8.4		1,407		6.7		1,332		6.4
Saesa group (2)		2,076		10.9		1,312		6.3		1,066		5.1
Emel group (3)		1,056		5.6		968		4.6		1,018		4.9
Total sales to the largest distribution companies		14,224		74.9		12,848		61.5		11,981		57.4
Unregulated customers:
Cía. Minera Collahuasi		927		4.9		894		4.3		903		4.3
Grupo CAP-CMP (4)		960		5.1		1,027		4.9		1,076		5.2
Cía. Minera Carmen de Andacollo		479		2.5		443		2.1		423		2.1
CMPC (5)		271		1.4		584		2.8		683		3.3
Codelco (6)		129		0.7		538		2.6		557		2.7
Cía. Minera Los Pelambres (7)		—		—		1,165		5.6		1,155		5.5
Total sales to the largest unregulated customers		2,766		14.6		4,650		22.3		4,797		23.1

(1) Excludes GasAtacama, which was included in previous reports.

(2) The values of the Saesa group include the consumption of the distributors Saesa and Empresa Eléctrica de la Frontera S.A.

(3) The data for the Emel group include the consumption of Empresa Eléctrica de Melipilla, Colchagua y Maule (Emelectric), Empresa Eléctrica de Talca (Emetal) and Empresa Eléctrica de Atacama (Emelat), customers of Endesa Chile. The Emel group is a subsidiary of the CGE group.

(4) Consumption of Grupo CAP and Compañía Minera del Pacífico S.A. (CMP) includes the contracts with CAP Huachipato, CMP Algarrobo, CMP Hierro Atacama, CMP Los Colorados, CMP Pellets and CMP Romeral.

(5) CMPC reduced its consumption from the Laja plant

(6) The contract with Codelco ended in March 2013.

(7) The contract with Compañía Minera Los Pelambres ended in December 2012.

We compete in the SIC primarily with two generation companies, Gener and Colbún S.A. (“Colbún”). According to the CDEC-SIC in 2013, in the SIC, Gener and its subsidiaries had an installed capacity of 2,579 MW, of which 89.5% was thermoelectric, and Colbún had an installed capacity of 2,957 MW, of which 57.4% was thermoelectric. In addition to these two large competitors, there are a number of smaller entities with an aggregate installed capacity of 2,973 MW that generate electricity in the SIC.

Our primary competitors in the SING are E-CL (GDF Suez Group) and Gener, which have 2,147 MW and 1,465 MW of installed capacity, respectively. Our direct participation in the SING includes our 182 MW Tarapacá thermal plant, owned by our subsidiary Celta.

Electricity generation companies compete largely on the basis of price, technical experience and reliability. In addition, because 64.3% of our installed capacity in the SIC comes from hydroelectric power plants, we have lower marginal production costs than companies generating electricity through thermal plants. Our thermal installed capacity benefits from access to gas from the Quintero LNG terminal. During periods of extended droughts, however, we may be forced to buy more expensive electricity from thermoelectric generators at spot prices in order to satisfy our contractual obligations.

40

Directly and through our subsidiaries, we are the principal generation operator in the SIC, with 38.3% of the total installed capacity and 40.5% of the electricity energy sales of this system in 2013.

In the SING, our subsidiary Celta accounted for 4.0% of the total installed capacity in 2013 and 6.6% of the electricity energy sales of this system in 2013.

Operations in Argentina

We participate in electricity generation in Argentina through subsidiaries of Endesa Chile (Endesa Costanera and El Chocón) and since April 2013, our subsidiary Dock Sud, with an aggregate of 25 power units with a total installed capacity of 4,522 MW. El Chocón owns nine hydroelectric units, with total installed capacity of 1,328 MW, Endesa Costanera owns eleven thermal units, with a total installed capacity of 2,324 MW and Dock Sud owns five thermal units with a total installed capacity of 870 MW. Our hydro and thermal generation units in Argentina represented 14.4% of the Argentine National Interconnection system (Sistema Interconectado Nacional, the “Argentine NIS”) installed capacity in 2013.

Our Argentine subsidiaries have holdings in three additional companies, Termoeléctrica Manuel Belgrano S.A., Termoeléctrica San Martín S.A. and Central Vuelta de Obligado S.A. These companies were formed to undertake the construction of three new generation facilities for FONINVEMEM. The first two plants started operations using gas turbines in 2008, with 1,125 MW of aggregate capacity, and combined cycles as of March 2010, with an additional 572 MW. The total aggregate capacity of these units is 1,697 MW (848 MW for Manuel Belgrano and 849 MW for San Martín). We expect that the third plant will start open cycle operations in mid-2015 (with an installed capacity of 550 MW) and in combined cycle in the beginning of 2016 (with a total installed capacity of 800 MW).

Since 2002, government intervention and energy industry authority actions, including limiting the spot price of electricity by considering the variable cost of generating electricity with natural gas and without considering the hydrological conditions of rivers and reservoirs or the use of more expensive fuels, have led to the lack of investment in the electric power sector. (See “Item 4. Operation of the Company— B. Business Overview — Electricity Industry Regulatory Framework” for further detail). In addition, from 2002, the Argentine government has taken an active role in controlling the supply of fuel to the electricity generation sector.

In March 2013, the government intervened with the fuel markets through the Resolution 95/2013. CAMMESA (the electric market operator) is now responsible of the supply and commercial management of fuels for electric generation purposes.

As of December 31, 2013, Endesa Costanera’s installed capacity accounted for 7.4% of the total installed capacity in the Argentine NIS. Endesa Costanera’s second combined-cycle plant can operate with either natural gas or diesel. Our 1,138 MW steam turbine power plant also can operate with either natural gas or fuel oil.

El Chocón accounted for 4.2% of the installed capacity in the Argentine NIS as of December 31, 2013. El Chocón has a 30-year concession, ending in 2023, for two hydroelectric generation facilities with an aggregate of 1,328 MW of installed capacity. The larger of the two facilities for which El Chocón has a concession of 1,200 MW of installed capacity is the primary flood control installation on the Limay River. The facility’s large reservoir, Ezequiel Ramos Mejía, enables El Chocón to be one of the Argentine NIS major peak suppliers. Variations in El Chocón’s water discharge are moderated by El Chocón’s Arroyito facility, a downstream dam with 128 MW of installed capacity. In November 2008, we finished construction work on the Arroyito dam, and increased the elevation of the reservoir water level, that allows releasing water at an additional 1,150 m3/sec, for a total of 3,750 m3/sec. The additional energy (69 GWh per year) was sold on the spot market until April 2009 and under the “Energy Plus” program thereafter. The Energy Plus program is the offer of new electricity capacity to supply the electricity demand growth, on top of the demand level for electricity in 2005. (For details on Energy Plus, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — Electricity Industry Regulatory Framework — Argentina”).

41

We began including Dock Sud’s installed capacity as of April 1, 2013, which accounted for 2.8% of the total installed capacity in the Argentine NIS. Dock Sud was contributed to us on March 28, 2013 as part of our capital increase. Dock Sud’s combined-cycle plant is composed of three generation units with a total installed capacity of 798 MW and can use either natural gas or diesel as fuel. Dock Sud’s two gas turbine units have 72 MW of installed capacity.

For information on the installed generation capacity for each of the Company’s Argentine subsidiaries, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — D. Property, Plant and Equipment” — Property, Plant and Equipment of Generating Companies”.

Our total generation in Argentina reached 14,422 GWh in 2013. Our generation market share was approximately 11.1% of total electricity production in Argentina during 2013, according to CAMMESA.

Hydroelectric generation in Argentina accounted for nearly 16.1% of our total generation in 2013. This was due to the restrictions of the operation of El Chocón that were imposed by CAMMESA and the dry conditions for the Limay River andfor the Collón Curá River, which are the main tributaries of El Chocón. Due to the drought in 2013, the region received around 83% of its historic average rainfall.

Generation by type and subsidiary is shown in the following table:

ELECTRICITY GENERATION IN ARGENTINA (GWh) (1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Generation		%		Generation		%		Generation		%
Hydroelectric generation (El Chocón)		2,317		16.1		2,801		24.8		2,404		22.4
Thermal generation (Endesa Costanera and Dock Sud) (2)		12,105		83.9		8,406		75.2		8,308		77.6
Total generation		14,422		100.0		11,207		100.0		10,713		100.0

(1) Figures may differ from those previously reported, as the current figures are shown net of all losses.

(2) Since April 2013, includes Dock Sud’s thermal generation in addition to Endesa Costanera’ thermal generation.

The following table sets forth our electricity generation and purchases in Argentina:

ELECTRICITY GENERATION AND PURCHASES IN ARGENTINA (GWh)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	(GWh)		%		(GWh)		%		(GWh)		%
Electricity generation (2)		14,422		87.2		11,207		94.6		10,713		94.1
Electricity purchases		2,126		12.8		645		5.4		668		5.9
Total		16,549		100.0		11,852		100.0		11,381		100.0

(1) Includes Dock Sud’s electricity generation and purchases since April 2013.

(2) Figures may differ from those previously reported, as the current figures are shown net of all losses.

42

The distribution of electricity sales in Argentina by customer segment and per subsidiary is shown in the following tables:

ELECTRICITY SALES PER CUSTOMER SEGMENT IN ARGENTINA (GWh)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013(1)				2012				2011
	Sales		% of Sales Volume		Sales		% of Sales Volume		Sales		% of Sales Volume
Contracted sales		2,225		13.4		2,155		18.2		2,145		18.8
Non-contracted sales		14,324		86.6		9,696		81.8		9,236		81.2
Total electricity sales		16,549		100.0		11,852		100.0		11,381		100.0

(1) Includes Dock Sud’s sales since April 2013.

ELECTRICITY SALES PER SUBSIDIARY IN ARGENTINA (GWh)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
Endesa Costanera		8,962		8,655		8,493
El Chocón		3,392		3,197		2,888
Dock Sud (1)		4,195		—		—
Total		16,549		11,852		11,381

(1) Includes Dock Sud’s sales since April 2013.

In March 2013, the government intervened in the commercial market for energy, except with respect to the “Energy Plus” program through the one-time application of Resolution 95/2013. CAMMESA (the electric market operator) is now responsible for the administration of contracts with end customers, except for contracts under the “Energy Plus” program. The resolution defined a transition period in which the electricity generating companies will continue managing the contracts until their expiration date.

At the end of 2013, Endesa Costanera was serving customers under 24 contracts. Endesa Costanera has no contracts with distribution companies.

The following table sets forth Endesa Costanera’s sales to its largest unregulated customers for each of the periods indicated:

ENDESA COSTANERA’S MAIN CUSTOMERS (GWh)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013					2012				2011
	Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales			Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales		Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales
Cencosud (Cemsa) (1)		42		7.2			78		9.2		73		9.9
Transclor (Cemsa) (1)		41		7.0			67		8.0		61		8.3
Peugeot (Cemsa) (1)		24		4.1			42		5.0		31		4.2
Hipermercado Libertad		40		6.9			23		2.7		—		—
Rasic Hnos.		25		4.2			41		4.8		39		5.3
YPF (Cemsa) (1)		—		—			145		17.1		152		20.6
Solvay		—		—			—		—		23		3.1
Total sales to our largest unregulated customers		173		29.3			395		46.8		379		51.4
					��

(1) These customers do not have contracts with Endesa Costanera, but are served through Cemsa, our subsidary.

Sales to the pool market amounted to 8,373 GWh in 2013.

43

In January 2013, El Chocón had 17 contracts with unregulated customers. Some of these contracts expired during the year and were not renewed. As a result, El Chocón had eight unregulated customers at the end of 2013. El Chocón has two contracts under the “Energy Plus” program; however, it has no contracts with distribution companies.

The following table sets forth sales by volume to El Chocón’s largest unregulated customers for each of the periods indicated:

EL CHOCÓN’S MAIN CUSTOMERS (GWh)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales		Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales		Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales
Minera Alumbrera		496		43.1		499		38.1		500		35.5
Air Liquide		152		13.2		161		12.3		161		11.4
Profertil (Cemsa) (1)		96		8.3		105		8.0		113		8.0
Praxair		55		4.8		98		7.5		91		6.4
Chevron		92		8.0		87		6.6		83		5.9
Acindar (Cemsa) (1)		82		7.1		81		6.2		80		5.7
Total sales to our largest unregulated customers		972		84.6		1,031		78.6		1,028		72.9

(1) Profertil and Acindar do not have contracts with El Chocón, but are served through Cemsa, our subsidary.

El Chocón does not have the right to terminate its operating agreement with Endesa Chile, unless Endesa Chile fails to perform its obligations under the agreement. Under the terms of the operating agreement, Endesa Chile is entitled to a fee payable in U.S. dollars based on El Chocón’s annual gross revenues, payable in monthly installments.

Beginning in April 2013, Dock Sud had 37 contracts with unregulated customers that were expiring during the year. By the end of 2013, Dock Sud had 13 contracts. Dock Sud has no contract with distribution companies.

The following table sets forth Dock Sud’s sales to its largest unregulated customers for each of the periods indicated:

DOCK SUD’S MAIN CUSTOMERS (GWh)(1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales		Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales		Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales
YPF		256		52.6		—		—		—		—
Total Austral S.A.		28		5.7		—		—		—		—
Transclor		21		4.2		—		—		—		—
Cencosud		20		4.2		—		—		—		—
Peugeot		18		3.8		—		—		—		—
Total sales to our largest unregulated customers		343		70.5		—		—		—		—

(1) Consumption from April 2013 to December 2013.

Sales to the pool market amounted to 3,708 GWh in 2013.

44

Electricity demand throughout the Argentine NIS increased 3.2% during 2013, according to CAMMESA. Total electricity demand was 125,167 GWh in 2013, 121,237 GWh in 2012 and 116,446 GWh in 2011. Our Argentine subsidiaries compete with all the major power plants connected to the Argentine NIS. According to the installed capacity reported by CAMMESA, in the monthly report for December 2013, our major competitors in Argentina are the state controlled company Enarsa (with an installed capacity of 2,155 MW), a nuclear unit “NASA” (with an installed capacity of 1,010 MW) and the hydroelectric units Yacyretá and Salto Grande (with an aggregate installed capacity of 3,690 MW). The main private competitors are: AES Group, Sociedad Argentina de Energía S.A. (“Sadesa”), and Pampa Energía. The AES Group has eight power plants connected to the Argentine NIS with a total installed capacity of 3,224 MW (37% of which is hydroelectric). Sadesa owns a total of approximately 3,858 MW of installed capacity, the most significant of which are Piedra del Águila (with an installed capacity of 1,400 MW) and Central Puerto (a thermal facility with 1,777 MW of installed capacity). Pampa Energía, with a total installed capacity of 2,184 MW, competes against us with six power plants, of which 630 MW is hydroelectric and 1,554 MW is thermal.

Generation in Brazil

Endesa Brasil consolidates operations of Endesa Fortaleza and Cachoeira Dourada, two generation companies; CIEN, which transmits electricity from two transmission lines between Argentina and Brazil; CTM and TESA, subsidiaries of CIEN, which are owners of the Argentine side of the lines; Ampla, the second largest electricity distribution company in the State of Rio de Janeiro; and Coelce, which is the sole electricity distributor in the State of Ceará.

As of December 2013, we had a total installed capacity of 987 MW in Brazil. Of this amount, 665 MW corresponds to Cachoeira Dourada and 322 MW to Endesa Fortaleza.

For information on the installed generation capacity for each of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiaries, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — D. Property, Plant and Equipment — Property, Plant and Equipment of Generating Companies”.

Generation by type and subsidiary in Brazil is shown in the following table:

ELECTRICITY GENERATION IN BRAZIL (GWh) (1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Generation		%		Generation		%		Generation		%
Hydroelectric generation (Cachoeira Dourada)		2,404		48.2		3,767		71.1		3,113		75.4
Thermal generation (Endesa Fortaleza)		2,588		51.8		1,416		28.9		1,017		24.6
Total		4,992		100.0		5,183		100.0		4,129		100.0

(1) Figures may differ from those previously reported, as the current figures are shown net of all losses.

During 2013, thermal generation represented 51.8% of total generation and hydroelectric generation represented the remaining 48.2% of our generation in Brazil. During 2013, hydrological conditions were below the historical average in the Paranaiba basin, where Cachoeira Dourada is located, with rainfall at approximately 81% of the historical average.

The portion of electricity supplied by Brazil’s own generation was 73.1% of total electricity sales, requiring 26.9% of purchases to satisfy contractual obligations to customers.

45

The following table sets forth our electricity generation and purchases in Brazil:

ELECTRICITY GENERATION AND PURCHASES IN BRAZIL (GWh)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	(GWh)		%		(GWh)		%		(GWh)		%
Electricity generation		4,992		73.1		5,183		71.1		4,129		60.5
Electricity purchases		1,835		26.9		2,108		28.9		2,699		39.5
Total (1)		6,826		100.0		7,291		100.0		6,828		100.0

(1) Electricity generation and electricity purchases differ from electricity sales because of transmission losses, our power plant’s own consumption and technical losses have already been deducted.

Cachoeira Dourada is a hydroelectric company with ten generation units with a total installed capacity of 665 MW located in southern Brazil. Cachoeira Dourada’s market share is 0.5% of the total installed capacity of the Brazilian system. It has long-term contracts (originally seven-year terms, expiring in 2015) with 34 distribution companies due to the bids carried out for regulated customers by theContratos de Comercialização de Energia no Ambiente Regulado (“CCEAR”). The contract sales with regulated customers in 2013 were for 1,109 GWh. Additionally, during 2013, Cachoeira had medium-term contracts (originally three to five year terms, expiring in 2014 and 2015) with 27 unregulated customers with an average duration of three years and short term contracts with 27 unregulated customers. Cachoeira’s sales to unregulated customers were 2,260 GWh.

The following table sets forth certain statistical information regarding Cachoeira Dourada’s electricity sales:

CACHOEIRA DOURADA’S ELECTRICITY SALES PER CUSTOMER SEGMENT (GWh)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Sales		% of Sales   Volume		Sales		% of Sales   Volume		Sales		% of Sales   Volume
Contracted sales		3,369		94.5		3,801		87.5		3,307		83.0
Non-contracted sales		195		5.5		544		12.5		679		17.0
Total electricity sales		3,564		100.0		4,344		100.0		3,986		100.0

Endesa Fortaleza is wholly-owned by Endesa Brasil. Endesa Fortaleza owns a combined-cycle plant with three generation units which use natural gas. The plant is located 50 kilometers from the capital of the Brazilian state of Ceará, and it began commercial operations in 2003. Since January 2010, Endesa Fortaleza has received natural gas from the Pecem regasification terminal.

Endesa Fortaleza’s market share is 0.3% of the total installed capacity of the Brazilian system and 1.0% of the thermoelectric generators. Fortaleza has a long-term contract with Coelce which expires in 2023.

The following table sets forth certain statistical information regarding Endesa Fortaleza’s electricity sales:

ENDESA FORTALEZA’S ELECTRICITY SALES PER CUSTOMER SEGMENT (GWh)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Sales		% of Sales   Volume		Sales		% of Sales   Volume		Sales		% of Sales   Volume
Contracted sales		2,690		82.5		2,690		91.3		2,690		94.7
Non-contracted sales		572		17.5		257		8.7		152		5.3
Total electricity sales		3,262		100.0		2,947		100.0		2,842		100.0

46

Operations in Colombia

Our generation operations in Colombia are carried out through Emgesa. We hold a 37.7% stake in Emgesa as of December 31, 2013, which we control and consolidate through Endesa Chile pursuant to a shareholder’s agreement. As of December 31, 2013, our Colombian subsidiary operated 29 generation units in Colombia, with a total installed capacity of 2,925 MW. Emgesa has 2,482 MW in hydroelectric plants and 444 MW in thermoelectric plants. Our hydroelectric and thermal generation plants in Colombia represent 20.0% of the country’s total electricity generation capacity as of December 2013, according to XM.

For information on the installed generation capacity for each of the Company’s Colombian subsidiaries, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — D. Property, Plant and Equipment” — Property, Plant and Equipment of Generating Companies.

Approximately 85% of our installed capacity in Colombia is hydroelectric. As a result, our electricity generation depends on the reservoir levels and rainfall. Our generation market share in Colombia was 20.5% in 2013, 22.2% in 2012 and 20.6% in 2011, according to XM. In addition to hydrological conditions, the amount of generation depends on our commercial strategy. Companies are free to offer their electricity at prices driven by market conditions and are dispatched by a centralized operating entity to generate according to the prices offered, as opposed to being dispatched according to the operating costs, as in other countries in which we operate.

During 2013, thermal generation represented 7.6% of total generation and hydroelectric generation represented the remaining 92.4% of our generation in Colombia. During 2013, hydrological conditions were below the historical average in Colombia, with rainfall around 91% of the historical average. For Emgesa, the flows in the Guavio River Basin were 84% of average and the flows in the Magdalena River (Betania) were 89% of average while the flows in the and Bogotá River (Cadena Nueva) were 132% of average according to XM. The poor hydrological condition affected Emgesa’s generation which was lower by 6.8% compared to 2012.

Generation by type in Colombia is shown in the following table:

ELECTRICITY GENERATION IN COLOMBIA (GWh) (1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012 (1)				2011 (1)
	Generation		%		Generation		%		Generation		%
Hydroelectric generation		11,784		92.4		12,649		95.5		11,613		96.4
Thermal generation		964		7.6		602		4.5		438		3.6
Total generation		12,748		100.0		13,251		100.0		12,051		100.0

(1) Figures may differ from those previously reported, as the current figures are shown net of all losses.

During 2013, Emgesa used 465 kilotons of coal for its coal-fired plants, which were obtained from over 20 local suppliers. The local coal price has remained below the export price as high transport costs make it difficult for domestic coal to compete in the export market. This trend is expected to continue in the Colombian coal market.

During 2013, Emgesa also entered into a fuel oil supply agreement with Esapetrol, which complemented the existing oil supply contracts with Petromil and Biomax. We believe this will ensure Emgesa has access to a reliable supply of fuel oil for the Cartagena power plant.

47

The following table sets forth our electricity generation and purchases in Colombia:

ELECTRICITY GENERATION AND PURCHASES IN COLOMBIA (GWh) (1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012 (1)				2011 (1)
	(GWh)		%		(GWh)		%		(GWh)		%
Electricity generation		12,748		78.6,		13,251		80.8		12,051		79.2
Electricity purchases		3,461		21.4		3,153		19.2		3,163		20.8
Total (2)		16,209		100.0		16,404		100.0		15,215		100.0

(1) Figures may differ from those previously reported, as the current figures are shown net of all losses.

(2) Electricity generation plus electricity purchases differ from electricity sales because of consumption by the pumps for the Muña reservoir.

The only interconnected electricity system in Colombia is the National Interconnected System (Sistema Interconectado Nacional, the “Colombian NIS”). Electricity demand in the Colombian NIS increased 2.6% during 2013. Total electricity consumption was: 60,890 GWh in 2013, 59,370 in 2012 and 57,150 GWh in 2011.

The generation in Colombia’s electricity market has been affected by an agreement with Ecuador to provide an interconnection between the electricity systems of Colombia and Ecuador. During 2013, Colombian electricity generators sold 662 GWh of electricity to Ecuadorian customers.

In addition, Colombia has interconnection links with Venezuela that operate under exceptional circumstances as needed by either of the two countries. In early April 2011, Colombia and Venezuela signed an agreement to supply energy to Venezuela as part of the normalization of commercial relations. The agreement also includes the import of gasoline and diesel from Venezuela. The total energy exported was 715 GWh in 2013.

The distribution of our electricity sales in Colombia by customer segment is shown in the following table:

ELECTRICITY SALES PER CUSTOMER SEGMENT IN COLOMBIA (GWh)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Sales		% of Sales Volume		Sales		% of Sales Volume		Sales		% of Sales Volume
Contracted sales		11,567		71.9		11,719		71.9		10,544		69.8
Non-contracted sales		4,523		28.1		4,585		28.1		4,568		30.2
Total electricity sales		16,090		100.0		16,304		100.0		15,112		100.0

During 2013, Emgesa served customers under an average of 798 contracts, serving 440 unregulated customers and 13 distribution and trading companies. Emgesa’s sales to our distribution company, Codensa, accounted for 36.7% of our total contracted sales in 2013. Electricity sales to the five largest unregulated customers represented 5.9% of total contracted sales.

48

The following table sets forth our sales by volume to our largest distribution customers in Colombia for the last three years:

MAIN DISTRIBUTION AND TRADING CUSTOMERS IN COLOMBIA (GWh)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales		Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales		Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales
Codensa (Enersis)		4,236		36.7		5,016		42.8		5,035		47.8
Electrificadora del Caribe (Electrocaribe)		2,262		19.6		371		3.2		360		3.4
Cía. Energética del Tolima (Enertolima)		498		4.3		—		—		—		—
Electrificadora de Boyacá (EBSA)		320		2.8		—		—		—		—
Empresas Públicas de Medellín (EPM)		249		2.1		806		6.9		760		7.2
Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca (EEC) (Enersis)		241		2.1		235		2.0		266		2.5
Centrales Eléctricas del Norte de Santander (CENS)		125		1.1		573		4.9		152		1.4
Electrificadora de Santander		39		0.3		373		3.2		47		0.4
Electrificadora del Huila		80		0.7		—		—		—		—
Electrificadora del Meta (Meta)		0		0		—		—		—		—
Total sales to our largest distribution customers		8,050		69.7		7,375		62.9		7,118		67.4

Our most important competitors in Colombia include the following state-owned companies: Empresas Públicas de Medellín (with an installed capacity of 3,251 MW) and Isagen (with an installed capacity of 2,182 MW). We also compete with the following private sector companies in Colombia: Chivor (with an installed capacity of 1,000 MW), which is owned by Gener; Colinversiones (with an installed capacity of 1,982 MW), which includes Termoflores and Epsa; and Gecelca (with an installed capacity of 1,207 MW).

Operations in Peru

Through our subsidiaries Edegel and EEPSA (since April 2013), we operate a total of 27 generation units in Peru, with a total installed capacity of 1,842 MW. As of December 31, 2013. Edegel owns 18 hydroelectric units, with a total installed capacity of 750 MW. The company has six thermal units, which represent the remaining 790 MW of total installed capacity of Edegel. EEPSA owns three thermal units with a total installed capacity of 302 MW. During October 2013, the TG 7 unit of Santa Rosa in Peru was decommissioned. Our hydroelectric and thermal generation plants in Peru represent 23.6% of the country’s total electricity generation capacity according to the information reported in December 2013 by Osinergmin.

For information on the installed generation capacity for each of the Company’s power plants in Peru, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — D. Property, Plant and Equipment — Property, Plant and Equipment of Generating Companies”.

49

Generation by type in Peru is shown in the following table:

ELECTRICITY GENERATION IN PERU (GWh) (1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Generation		%		Generation		%		Generation		%
Hydroelectric generation (Edegel)		4,474		52.7		4,428		51.7		4,528		50.4
Thermal generation (Edegel and EEPSA) (2)		4,014		47.3		4,141		48.3		4,452		49.6
Total generation		8,489		100.0		8,570		100.0		8,980		100.0

(1) Figures may differ from those previously reported, as the current figures are shown net of all losses.

(2) Includes EEPSA’s generation since April 1, 2013. Before April 1, 2013, the thermal generation refers only to Edegel.

In 2013, we generated 22.2% of total electricity production in Peru according to COES.

Hydroelectric generation represented 52.7% of our Peruvian generation subsidiaries total production in 2013. For Edegel, all hydrological contributions were above their historical average in 2013. In the Rimac River Basin (Huinco, Matucana, Callahuanca, Moyopampa, Huampaní) hydrological contributions were 114%; in the Tulumayo River (Yanango) hydrological contributions were 112%; and in the Tarma River (Chimay) hydrological contributions were 118% according to COES, the operator of the Peruvian system.

The portion of electricity supplied by our Peruvian generation subsidiaries’ own generation was 89.4% of total electricity sales, requiring 10.6% of purchases to satisfy contractual obligations to customers.

Edegel has long-term gas supply, transportation and distribution contracts for its Ventanilla and Santa Rosa facilities. It has also signed firm transport capacity transfer agreements with other generators, which allows them to trade firm transport capacity to operate as indicated for the COES (the electric market operator) and optimize the use of the natural gas transport system.

The following table sets forth our electricity generation and purchases in Peru:

ELECTRICITY GENERATION AND PURCHASES IN PERU (GWh) (1)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013(2)				2012(1)				2011(1)
	(GWh)		%		(GWh)		%		(GWh)		%
Electricity generation		8,489		89.4		8,570		89.4		8,980		95.0
Electricity purchases		1,009		10.6		1,018		10.6		469		5.0
Total		9,497		100.0		9,587		100.0		9,450		100.0

(1) Figures may differ from those previously reported, as the current figures are shown net of all losses.

(2) Includes EEPSA’s electricity generation and purchases since April 2013.

The Peruvian National Interconnected Electric System (Sistema Eléctrico Interconectado Nacional, “SEIN”) is the only interconnected system in Peru. Electricity sales in the SEIN increased 5.9% during 2013 compared to 2012, reaching total annual sales of 35,632 GWh.

50

The distribution of Edegel’s electricity sales by customer segment is shown in the following table:

EDEGEL’S ELECTRICITY SALES PER CUSTOMER SEGMENT (GWh)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Sales		% of Sales Volume		Sales		% of Sales Volume		Sales		% of Sales Volume
Contracted sales (1)		7,892		88.6		9,092		94.8		8,632		91.3
Non-contracted sales		1,011		11.4		495		5.2		818		8.7
Total electricity sales		8,903		100.0		9,587		100.0		9,450		100.0

(1) Includes sales to distributors without contracts.

Edegel’s electricity sales in 2013 decreased 7.1% compared with 2012 mainly due the expiration of contracts, which is reflected in the lower contracted sales. During 2013, Edegel had nine regulated customers and 14 unregulated customers. Sales to unregulated customers represented 42.2% of Edegel’s total contracted sales in 2013.

During 2011, Luz del Sur carried out a long-term tender process for 2018-2027, with an energy requirement of approximately 2,500 GWh per year. An amount of 2,245 GWh was granted to Cerro del Águila, Celepsa, Egesur, Enersur and Fenix. The remaining unallocated amount of 255 GWh was declared void.

During 2012, Edelnor carried out a long-term tender process for 2016-2027, with an energy requirement of approximately 990 GWh per year. The contracts were granted to EEPSA (12.5%), Egejunin (1.8%), Edegel (42.3%), Fenix (24.9%) and Kallpa (18.5%).

In 2013, there were no long-term tenders in Peru.

51

The following table sets forth our sales by volume to our largest customers of Edegel for each of the periods indicated:

EDEGEL’S MAIN CUSTOMERS (GWh)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales		Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales		Contracted Sales		% of Contracted Sales
Distribution companies:
Edelnor (Regulated) (1) (2)		2,455		31.1		3,130		34.4		4,173		48.3
Luz del Sur (Regulated) (1)		1.250		15.8		1,917		21.1		1,539		17.8
ElectroSur (3)		367		4.7		362		4.0		—		—
Seal		237		3.0		—		—		99		1.1
Hidrandina (3)		92		1.2		573		6.3		—		—
Total sales to our largest distribution companies		4,401		55.8		5,981		65.8		5,811		67.2
Unregulated customers:
Refinería Cajamarquilla		1,341		17.0		1,332		14.6		1,320		15.3
Antamina		912		11.6		889		9.8		708		8.2
SN Power		349		4.4		—		—		—		—
Siderúrgica del Peru		322		4.1		3.9		3.4		288		3.3
Creditex		83		1.0		72		0.8		78		0.9
Total sales to our largest unregulated companies		3,006		38.1		2,601		28.6		2,394		27.7
Total sales to our largest customers		7,407		93.9		8,583		94.4		8,205		94.9

(1) The figures for Edelnor and Luz del Sur represent sales under bilateral contracts with Edegel only, and not withdrawals of these companies assigned to Edegel for non contract-related consumption. The energy sold to these distributors includes the amount granted to Edegel in the bids realized since 2006.

(2) Edelnor reduced its consumption in 2013 compared to 2012 due to the reduction in the dispatch of two contracts.

(3) Hidrandina and ElectroSur have been customers since 2012. Edegel entered into bilateral contracts with each customer at the bar price between January 2012 and December 2012 and between January 2012 and December 2013, respectively.

EEPSA has five long term “wet” gas sale and purchase agreements, under which EEPSA purchases “wet” gas which is used for electric generation purposes at its Malacas Power Plant and sells “dry” gas to Talara refinery (owned by Petroperu, the Peruvian NOC) through a supply agreement. To satisfy those needs of “dry” gas, EEPSA has an agreement with Pariñas Processing Plant, which allows EEPSA to convert wet gas into dry gas and also recover natural gas liquids, which are shared with Pariñas Processing Plant.

EEPSA’s electricity sales between April and December 2013, where all contracted. EEPSA had contracts with three regulated customers and three unregulated customers. Sales to unregulated customers represented 93.5% of EEPSA’s total contracted sales.

52

EEPSA’s ELECTRICITY SALES PER CUSTOMER SEGMENT (GWh)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013(1)				2012				2011
	Sales		% of Sales Volume		Sales		% of Sales Volume		Sales		% of Sales Volume
Contracted sales (2)		594		100		—		—		—		—
Non-contracted sales		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total electricity sales		594		100.0		—		—		—		—

(1) From April to December 2013.

(2) Includes sales to distributors without contracts.

The following table sets forth EEPSA’s largest customers:

EEPSA’S MAIN CUSTOMERS (GWh)

	Year ended December 31,
	2013(1)				2012				2011
	Contracted  Sales		% of Contracted Sales		Contracted  Sales		% of Contracted Sales		Contracted  Sales		% of Contracted Sales
Distribution companies:
Luz del Sur		436		73.4		—		—		—		—
Edelnor		113		19.0		—		—		—		—
Total sales to our largest distribution companies		548		92.3		—		—		—		—

(1) From April to December 2013

Our most important competitors in Peru are Enersur (GDF-Suez group, with an installed capacity of 1,264 MW); Electroperú (a state-owned competitor, with an installed capacity of 902 MW); Kallpa (Inkia Energy group, with an installed capacity of 861 MW); and Egenor (Duke Energy group, with an installed capacity of 622 MW).

Electricity Transmission Business Segment

CIEN

CIEN is wholly-owned by Endesa Brasil, and we hold an 83.5% economic interest in CIEN. CIEN consolidates CTM and TESA, which operate the Argentine side of the interconnection line between Argentina and Brazil. In 2013, CIEN represented 1.1% of our operating revenues and 1.9% of our operating income, both before consolidation adjustments. Since April 2011, CIEN has been recognized by the local authority as a “regulatory asset” and therefore is a participant in the basic Brazilian grid. Therefore, it is entitled to receive fixed payments called Permitted Annual Compensation (RAP).

CIEN allows for the energy integration of Mercosur and the import and export of electricity between Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil. It has two transmission lines covering a distance of 500 kilometers between Rincón in Argentina and the Santa Catarina substation in Brazil, and a total installed capacity of 2,100 MW. CIEN operates each transmission line under a 30-year concession granted by the Brazilian government that will be in force until 2020 and 2022 respectively. Its subsidaries, CTM and TESA, have concessions for 87 and 85 years, respectively, and both expire in 2087.

53

Electricity Distribution Business Segment

Our electricity distribution business is conducted in Chile through Chilectra, in Argentina through Edesur, in Brazil through Ampla and Coelce, in Colombia through Codensa, and in Peru through Edelnor. For the year ended December 31, 2013 electricity sales increased by 4% compared to 2012 , totaling 75,443 GWh. For more information on energy sales by our distribution subsidiaries for the last five fiscal years, see “Item 3. Key Information — A. Selected Financial Data”. Currently, Chilectra is the technical operator of Edesur, Edelnor, Ampla and Coelce, but does not receive operator fees.

Until December 31, 2012, jointly controlled companies were consolidated using the proportionate consolidation method. Commencing January 1, 2013, we began recording these jointly controlled companies using the equity method, as required by IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements. In the distribution business, the application of IFRS 11 requires the retrospective exclusion of EEC from our 2012 and 2011 consolidated financial statements. As a result, the data presented in this Report excludes the proportional data for EEC that was previously reported.

Chilectra

Chilectra is one of the largest electricity distribution companies in Chile in terms of the number of the regulated customers, distribution assets and energy sales. Our economic interest in Chilectra is 99.1%. Chilectra operates in a concession area of 2,118 square kilometers, under an indefinite concession granted by the Chilean government. Chilectra transmits and distributes electricity in 33 municipalities of the Santiago metropolitan region. Its service area is defined primarily as a high density area under the Chilean tariff regulations governing electricity distribution companies and includes all residential, commercial, industrial, governmental, and toll customers. The Santiago metropolitan region, which is the capital of Chile, is the country’s most densely populated area and has the highest concentration of industries, industrial parks and office facilities in the country. As of December 31, 2013, Chilectra distributed electricity to approximately 1.7 million customers. Chilectra also has direct equity stakes in foreign distribution subsidiaries controlled by us. Chilectra’s energy losses were 5.3% in 2013, compared to 5.4 % in 2012. This decrease in energy losses is due to the effectiveness of energy loss plans focused on technical inspections and loss management, among other initiatives.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, residential, commercial, industrial and other customers, who are primarily public and municipal, represented 27%, 31%, 19% and 24%, respectively, of Chilectra’s total energy sales of 15,152 GWh, which is an increase of 4.9% in comparison with 2012.

The following table sets forth Chilectra’s principal operating data for each of the periods indicated.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
Electricity sales (GWh)		15,152		14,445		13,697
Residential		4,048		3,778		3,520
Commercial		4,639		4,212		3,683
Industrial		2,903		3,061		3,091
Other customers (1)		3,562		3,394		3,402
Number of customers (thousands)		1,694		1,659		1,638
Residential		1,516		1,489		1,471
Commercial		132		127		126
Industrial		12		12		11
Other customers		34		31		30
Energy purchased (GWh) (2)		16,002		15,264		14,488
Total energy losses (%) (3)		5.3%		5.4%		5.5%

(1) The data for other customers includes tolls.

(2) During 2013, 29.4% of electricity purchased was acquired from Endesa Chile, 33% in 2012, and 37% in 2011.

(3) Electricity losses are calculated as the percent difference between electricity purchased and electricity sold (GWh) within a given period. Losses in distribution arise from illegally tapped lines as well as technical failures.

As of December 31, 2013, Chilectra’s principal unregulated customers are (ordered alphabetically): Aguas Andinas S.A., Cencosud, CGE Distribución S.A., El Mercurio S.A, Empresa Eléctrica de Colina Limitada (a related company), Esco Elecmetal, Etp Metro S.A., Gerdau Aza S.A., Goodyear Chile S.A.C.I., Linde Gas Chile S.A. (formerly Aga S.A.), Mall Plaza S.A., Nestlé Chile S.A, Praxair Chile S.A., Sca Chile S.A. (formerly Papeles Industriales S.A.), Telefónica Chile S.A. and Walmart Chile S.A.

54

Chilectra’s 2013 collection rate was 99.85%, compared to 101.20% in 2012, principally due to a deterioration in the residential customer segment. Chilectra’s 2012 collection rate was over 100% due to the collection of unpaid bills from previous years.

For the supply to regulated distribution customers, Chilectra submitted bids in November 2006, July 2007 and March 2008, allocating 100% of the power requirements tendered from 2010 to 2025. Prices obtained by Chilectra as part of these tenders are consistent with the system’s long-term expansion technology and prices are indexed to the CPI and the price of coal and LNG. During 2010, Chilectra submitted bids allocating 75% of the power requirements tendered from 2014 to 2029. A bidding process was held in 2013 and Chilectra was allocated 78% of its energy requirements, allowing Chilectra to meet the expected demand of its regulated customers through 2015. In 2014, a new bidding process is expected. If Chilectra is successful in being awarded this 2014 bid, Chilectra expects to meet the demand of its regulated customers from 2016 through 2018.

On April 2, 2013, lower distribution tariffs for Chilectra were published due primarily to efficiency gains. The tariffs have decreased by 4.5%, with retroactive application from November 2012.

Edesur

Edesur is the second largest electricity distribution company in Argentina in terms of energy purchases after Edenor, an unrelated company. Our economic interest in Edesur is 71.6% . Edesur operates in a concession area of 3,309 square kilometers. Edesur distributes electricity in the south-central part of the greater Buenos Aires metropolitan area, under a 95-year concession granted by the Argentine government that will be in force until 2087. Its service area comprises the major business district of Buenos Aires and several residential areas of the southern part of Buenos Aires. As of December 31, 2013, Edesur distributed electricity to 2.4 million customers. Residential, commercial, industrial and other customers, primarily public and municipal, represented 43%, 24%, 8% and 24%, respectively, of Edesur’s total energy sales. It had energy losses of 10.8% in 2013, compared to 10.6% in 2012.

The following table sets forth Edesur’s principal operating data for each of the periods indicated.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
Electricity sales (GWh)		18,137		17,738		17,233
Residential		7,845		7,570		7.274
Commercial		4,432		4,540		4.437
Industrial		1,420		1,370		1.364
Other customers (1)		4,440		4,258		4.158
Number of customers (thousands)		2,444		2,389		2.389
Residential		2,140		2,086		2,088
Commercial		270		269		266
Industrial		23		23		25
Other customers		11		11		10
Energy purchased (GWh) (2)		20,334		19,842		9,255
Total energy losses (%) (3)		10.8%		10.6%		10.5%

(1) The figures for other customers include tolls.

(2) Edesur purchased all of its energy from CAMMESA, the governmental agency that regulates and acts as an intermediary between generation and distribution.

(3) Energy losses are calculated as the percent difference between energy purchased and energy sold (GWh) within a given period. Losses in distribution arise from illegally tapped energy as well as technical failures.

As of December 31, 2013, Edesur’s principal unregulated customers are (ordered alphabetically): Abbott Laboratories ARG. S.A, American Express, Arcor, Cencosud S.A, Gas Lanus S.A, Jumbo Retail S.A, Metalcris S.A, Nextel Communications Arg. S.R.L, Petrobras Energía S.A, Pfizer S.R.L, Pluspetrol S.A, Praxair Arg. S.R.L, Telefónica Argentina S.A. and Walmart Arg.

55

Edesur’s 2013 collection rate was 100.36%, compared to 99.32%, in 2012, principally as a result of improvements in the residential customers segment. The 2013 collection rate was more than 100% due to the collection of unpaid bills from previous years.

As result of the applications of the Resolution ENRE 347/2012, Edesur has a trust that amounts Ar$ 440 million annually.

Secretariat of Energy Resolution 250/2013 requires that Edesur desist from all legal actions against the government for not implementingMecanismo de Monitoreo de Costos (“MMC” in its Spanish acronym) and the Integral Tariff Revision. On November 6, 2013, the Secretariat of Energy published Note 6852, which authorizes Edesur to be compensated by the MMC for debt generated as a result of the Energy Efficiency Program (“Puree” in its Spanish acronym) for the period of March through September 2013. Total compensation for the period ended September 30, 2013 amounted Ar$ 2,902 million. ENRE published Resolution 336/2012 on November 19, 2012 to impose extraordinary penalties on Edesur for the blackouts in Edesur’s concession area between October 29, 2012 and November 14, 2012 (including the blackouts in Buenos Aires on November 7, 2012 and outages caused by storms on October 29 and November 9, 2012). As part of the penalties, Edesur must provide credits to the customers affected by the blackouts. These penalties are estimated to be approximately Ar$ 51.4 million for Edesur. Due to the supply cuts that affected Buenos Aires from December 16, 2013 through January 2014, ENRE issued the Resolution ENRE 1/2014, that defines the extraordinary penalties that Edesur must pay to the affected customers during the blackout. As of December 2013, Edesur recorded Ar$ 238.8 lower income for this reason, although the final amount of penalties is under revision. For more details, please refer to “Electricity Industry Regulatory Framework — Argentina — Regulation of Distribution Companies — Incentives and penalties”, below.

Ampla

Ampla is the second largest electricity distribution company in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in terms of the number of customers and annual energy sales. As of December 31, 2013, we owned a 91.6% economic interest in Ampla. Ampla is engaged mainly in the distribution of electricity to 66 municipalities of the State of Rio de Janeiro and serves 2.7 million customers in a concession area of 32,615 square kilometers, with an estimated population of 8.0 million. Ampla operates under a 30-year concession granted by the Brazilian government and it will remain in force until December 2026. As of December 31, 2013, residential, commercial, industrial and other customers represented 41%, 19%, 8% and 32%, respectively, of Ampla’s total sales of 11,049 GWh. As of December 31, 2013, Ampla’s energy losses were 19.8%, compared to 19.6% in 2012.

The following table sets forth Ampla’s principal operating data for each of the periods indicated.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
Electricity sales (GWh)		11,049		10,816		10,223
Residential		4,512		4,359		3,908
Commercial		2,133		2,133		1,861
Industrial		918		1,011		1,177
Other customers (1)		3,486		3,313		3,277
Number of customers (thousands)		2,801		2,712		2,644
Residential		2,536		2,451		2,385
Commercial		171		168		168
Industrial		5		5		5
Other customers		89		88		86
Energy purchased (GWh) (2)		13,770		13,458		12,725
Total energy losses (%) (3)		19.8%		19.6%		19.7%

(1) The data for other customers includes tolls.

(2) During 2013, 0.4% of the electricity purchased was acquired from Endesa Fortaleza and/or Cachoeira Dourada, 0.5% in 2012 and 0.6% in 2011.

(3) Electricity losses are calculated as the percent difference between electricity purchased and electricity sold (GWh) within a given period. Losses in distribution arise from illegally tapped lines as well as technical failures.

56

Ampla’s 2013 collection rate was 99.43%, compared to 97.80% in 2012, due principally to the significant improvement in the municipal and residential segments.

As of December 31, 2013, Ampla’s main unregulated customers are (ordered alphabetically): Lafarge Brasil, Michelin, Petrobras, Peugeot, Quattor Petroquimica, Rio Polimeros S.A, Volkswagen and Votorantim. Ampla’s 2013 collection rate was 99.43%, compared to 97.80% in 2012. This is due principally to significant improvements in the municipal and residential segments.

On January 24, 2013, ANEEL’s extraordinary tariff review under Law 12,783/2013 led to a 20% tariff reduction for Ampla’s regulated customers.

On March 8, 2013, Presidential Decree 7.945/2013 authorized the pass-through of federal resources to distributors, through the CDE or an energetic development account, in order to partially offset costs of electricity generation due to the drought. During 2013, Ampla received Ch$ 82 billion. On March 7, 2014, Presidential Decree 8.203/2014, as did the previous Decree 7.945/2013, permitted the CDE to reimburse additional costs that distribution companies incurred. The decree allows the Brazilian Treasury to allocate funds to the CDE. For January 2014, Ampla received Ch$ 14.1 billion pursuant to the decree.

Under its concession, Ampla is subject to comprehensive tariff reviews every four years and yearly tariff reviews. Ampla’s last applicable annual tariff adjustment was on April 15, 2013, which applied retroactively from March 15, 2013, and led to an average increase of 12.1% as a result of a change in inflation and energy costs, in addition to the sector charges and subsidies. The last comprehensive tariff review was in 2009, and Ampla is currently undergoing a comprehensive review, which is expected to conclude on April 8, 2014, with retroactive effect to March 15, 2014.

Coelce

As of December 31, 2013, we held a 49.2% economic interest in Coelce, the sole electricity distributor in the State of Ceará in northeastern Brazil. Coelce serves over 3.5 million customers within a concession area of 148,825 square kilometers, under a 30-year concession granted by the Brazilian government, which will remain in force until May 2028. Residential, commercial, industrial and other customers represented 35%, 18%, 11% and 36%, respectively, of Coelce’s total energy sales. As of such date, Coelce’s energy losses were 12.5%, compared to 12.6% in 2012.

57

The following table sets forth Coelce’s principal operating data for each of the periods indicated.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
Electricity sales (GWh)		10,718		9,878		8,970
Residential		3,703		3,327		3,053
Commercial		1,951		1,834		1,679
Industrial		1,169		1,188		1,278
Other customers (1)		3,895		3,527		2,960
Number of customers (thousands)		3,500		3,338		3,224
Residential		2,720		2,426		2,360
Commercial		223		169		164
Industrial		7		6		6
Other customers		550		737		694
Energy purchased (GWh)		12,246		11,300		10,183
Total energy losses (%) (2)		12.5%		12.6%		11.9%

(1) The data for other customers includes tolls. During 2013, 22.0% of the electricity purchased was acquired from Endesa Fortaleza, 24% in 2012 and 26% in 2011.

(2) Electricity losses are calculated as the percent difference between electricity purchased and electricity sold (GWh) within a given period. Losses in distribution arise from illegally tapped lines as well as technical failures.

As of December 31, 2013, Coelce’s main unregulated customers are (ordered alphabetically): Ancora, Carrefour, Companhia Brasilera Distribuição, Durametal, Gerdau, Lojas, Mecesa, Petrobras, Telemar Norte e Leste, Vicunha Textil and Votorantim.

Coelce’s 2013 collection rate was 100.74% compared to 99.48% in 2012, and was due principally to improvements in all customer segments. The 2013 collection rate was more than 100% due to the collection of unpaid bills from previous years.

Under its concession, Coelce is subject to tariff reviews every four years. Coelce’s ordinary tariff reviews should have been introduced in 2011. However, rates remained unchanged due to the uncertainty of the new methodology to be applied. With the publication of the new methodology, on April 22, 2012, Coelce received both the annual adjustment and a tariff review retroactive to April 2011. The ordinary tariff review stated that Coelce should return the additional income that was received between April 2011 and April 2012, a period in which the reviewed tariff was not applied, through a lower annual tariff adjustment in 2013 and 2014.

After the ruling of the Brazilian court, in June 2012, ANEEL was forced to accept the new tariffs, including the application of fiscal incentives granted to companies in the area of SUDENE (Superintendency of the Development of Northeast).This led to a 0.85% increase in customers’ tariffs.

On January 24, 2013, ANEEL’s extraordinary tariff review under Law 12,783/2013 led to a 20% tariff reduction for Coelce’s regulated customers.

On March 8, 2013, Presidential Decree 7.945/2013 authorized the pass-through of federal resources to distributors, through the CDE or an energetic development account, in order to partially offset costs of electricity generation due to the drought. During 2013, Coelce received an additional Ch$ 39 billion. On March 7, 2014, Presidential Decree 8.203/2014, as did the previous Decree 7.945/2013, permitted the CDE to reimburse additional costs that distribution companies. The decree allows the Brazilian Treasury to allocate funds to the CDE. For January 2014, Coelce received Ch$ 4.5 billion pursuant to the decree.

Under its concession, Coelce is subject to comprehensive tariff reviews every four years and yearly tariff reviews. Coelce’s last applicable annual tariff adjustment was on April 22, 2013, and led to an average increase of 3.5% as a result of a change in inflation and energy costs, among others, which includes the returned revenues from the delayed application of the 2011 comprehensive tariff review.

58

As of the date of this Report, Enersis owns 74.0% of Coelce after a voluntary tender offer in which we acquired an additional 15.1% of the shares. See “Item 4A – Recent Developments”.

Codensa

As of December 31, 2013, we held a 48.4% economic interest in Codensa. Codensa is an electricity distribution company that serves a concession area of 14,087 square kilometers in Bogotá and 103 other municipalities in the provinces of Cundinamarca, Tolima and Boyacá. More than 9.6 million people live in Codensa’s service area, where it serves approximately 2.7 million customers. According to Colombian law, since no concessions are granted, an administrative authorization is required to provide the distribution service. In the case of Codensa, the authorization is of indefinite duration.

Since 2001, Codensa only services regulated customers. The unregulated market is serviced directly by our generation company, Emgesa, with the exception of the public lighting in Bogotá. In 2013, Codensa had energy losses of 7.0%, compared to 7.3% in 2012. On September 25, 2012, CREG established the energy losses target of 9.61% that will be recognized in Codensa´s distribution tariff for the next five years.

The following table sets forth the primary indicators of Codensa for each of the periods indicated.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
Electricity sales (GWh)		13,342		12,972		12,552
Residential		4,491		4,423		4,367
Commercial		2,152		2.114		2,045
Industrial		862		897		886
Other customers (1)		5,837		5,538		5,254
Number of customers (thousands)		2,687		2,588		2,496
Residential		2,381		2,289		2,207
Commercial		259		252		244
Industrial		44		43		41
Other customers		3		4		4
Energy purchased (GWh) (2)		14,351		13,995		13,612
Total energy losses (%) (3)		7.0%		7.3%		7.8%

(1) The data for other customers includes tolls.

(2) During 2013, 41.3% of the electricity purchased was acquired from Emgesa, 41% in 2012 and 57% in 2011.

(3) Electricity losses are calculated as the percent difference between electricity purchased and electricity sold (GWh) within a given period. Losses in distribution arise from illegally tapped lines as well as technical failures.

As of December 31, 2013, Codensa’s only unregulated customer was Alumbrado Público Distrito Capital Bogotá.

Codensa’s 2013 collection rate was 99.90% compared to 101.29% in 2012, due principally to decreases in collection in the government segment. The 2012 collection rate was more than 100% due to the collection of unpaid bills from previous years.

Codensa’s ordinary tariff review is currently in progress and it is expected to conclude during 2014.

59

Edelnor

As of December 31, 2013, we owned a 75.5% economic interest in Edelnor, our Peruvian electricity distribution company. Edelnor operates in a concession area of 1,517 square kilometers under an indefinite concession granted by the Peruvian government. Edelnor has an exclusive concession to distribute electricity in the northern part of the Lima metropolitan area, some provinces of the Lima region, such as Huaral, Huaura, Barranca and Oyón, and in the adjacent province of Callao. As of December 31, 2013, Edelnor distributed electricity to approximately 1.3 million customers, an increase of 4.3% over 2012.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, Edelnor had total energy sales of 7,045 GWh, an increase of 2.7% over 2012. Edelnor had energy losses of 7.9% in 2013, a significant improvement when compared to 8.2% in 2012.

The following table sets forth Edelnor’s principal operating data for each of the periods indicated.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
Electricity sales (GWh)		7,045		6,863		6,572
Residential		2,634		2,530		2,402
Commercial		1,582		1,501		1,419
Industrial		1,239		1,288		1,271
Other customers (1)		1,590		1,544		1,480
Number of customers (thousands)		1,255		1,203		1,144
Residential		1,185		1,136		1,077
Commercial		41		41		41
Industrial		1		1		1
Other customers		28		25		25
Energy purchased (GWh) (2)		7,653		7,475		7,155
Total energy losses (%) (3)		7.9%		8.2%		8.2%

(1) The data for other customers includes tolls.

(2) During 2013, 37% of the electricity purchased was acquired from Edegel and EEPSA, 46% in 2012, and 70% in 2011.

(3) Electricity losses are calculated as the percent difference between electricity purchased and electricity sold (GWh) within a given period. Losses in distribution arise from illegally tapped lines as well as technical failures.

As of December 31, 2013, Edelnor’s primary unregulated customers are (ordered alphabetically): Alicorp, Celima, Corp., Lindley, Filamentos Industriales, Goodyear Peru, Indeco, Lima Airport Partners, Molitalia, Peruana de Moldeados, Saga Falabella and Tecnofil.

Edelnor’s 2013 collection rate was 100.29% compared to 99.55%, principally due to improvements in the government and corporate segments. The 2013 collection rate was more than 100% due to the collection of unpaid bills from previous years.

In 2012, Edelnor had two auctions to secure short–term energy supply for the period from 2013 through 2017 and other to secure long–term energy supply from 2016 until 2027 for 160.8 MW. In all three auctions, the entire amounts tendered were awarded.

On October 16, 2013, Osinergmin set Edelnor’s distribution tariffs for the four-year period of November 2013 through October 2017. The new tariff increased by 1.2% compared to the tariff in place in October 2013, but represented a reduction of 0.7% when compared to the tariff in place in December 2012.

60

Non-Electricity Businesses

Inmobiliaria Manso de Velasco (Chile)

Inmobiliaria Manso de Velasco, a wholly-owned subsidiary, develops real estate projects in Chile and represents less than 0.2% of our 2013 operating revenues before consolidation adjustments.

ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

The following chart shows a summary of the main characteristics of the electricity regulatory framework by business segment for the five countries in which we operate.

		Argentina	Brazil	Chile	Peru	Colombia
	Unregulated Market	Regulated remuneration scheme Resolution 95/2013	Spot markets with costs audited by the regulator			Spot market with auctioned cost (Price-offered)
Gx	Regulated	Seasonal Price	Auction 20 years for Thermal / 30 years for Hydro	Node Price auction 15 years	Node Price auction 20 years	Auction 3/5 years
	Capacity	Contribution peak demand	—	Income based on contributions during peak demand		Firm energy contribution (energy auctions for at least 20 years)
Tx	Features		Public - Open Access - Regulated Tariff – Monopoly Regime for Transmission System Operators (“TSOs”)
Dx	Law	Concession contract		Administrative Concession (indefinite)		Authorization Operation Zone
	Expansion	95 years	30 years	Undefined
	Tariff review	5 years	4/5 years	4 years		5 years
Cx	Unregulated Agents	> 0.03 MW	> 0.5 MW	> 0.5 MW	> 0.2 MW	> 0.1 MW
	Liberalized (%)	» 20%	»25%	»30%	»45%	»30%

Gx: Generation Tx: Transmission Dx: Distribution Cx: Trading

61

Chile

Industry Overview

Industry Structure

The Chilean electricity industry is divided into three business segments: generation, transmission and distribution. These business segments are carried out by publicly-owned private sector companies. The state’s role is circumscribed to regulation, supervision and indicative investment planning through non-binding recommendations in the case of the generation and transmission businesses, with the exception of the main transmission system in which indicative planning is binding as well as part of the bidding processes for its construction.

The following chart shows the relationships among the various participants in the Chilean market:

The generation segment comprises a group of electricity companies that own generating plants, whose energy is transmitted and distributed to end customers. This segment is characterized by being a competitive market which operates under market-driven conditions. Generating plants sell their production to distribution companies, unregulated customers, other generation companies, and their surpluses on the spot market.

The transmission system comprises a combination of lines, substations and equipment for the transmission of electricity from the production points (generators) to the centers of consumption or distribution. Transmission in Chile is defined as lines or substations with a voltage or tension higher than 23 kV. The transmission system is open access, and transmission companies may impose rights of way over the available transmission capacity through the payment of tolls.

The distribution segment is defined for regulatory purposes as all electricity supplies to end customers at a voltage no higher than 23 kV. Distribution companies operate under a distribution public utility concession regime, with service obligations and regulated tariffs for supplying regulated customers.

Customers are classified according to their amount of demand, as follows: (i) unregulated customers with a connected capacity over 2,000 kW; (ii) regulated customers with connected capacity of no more than 500 kW; and (iii) customers that choose for either a regulated-tariff or an unregulated regime, for a minimum period of four years in each regime, available to customers whose connected capacity falls in the range of 500 kW to 2,000 kW.

The distribution companies supply regulated customers, a segment for which the price and supply conditions are the result of tender processes regulated by the CNE, and unregulated customers, with bilateral agreements between generators, whose conditions are freely negotiated and agreed.

62

In Chile, there are four separate interconnected electricity systems. The main systems that cover the most populated Chilean areas are the SIC, which services the central and south central part of the territory, where 92% of the Chilean population lives, and the SING, which operates in the northern part of the country, where most of the mining industry is located and where 6% of the Chilean population lives (figures based on the 2013 CDEC-SIC annual report). In addition to the SIC and the SING, there are two isolated systems in southern Chile that provide electricity to remote areas, where 2% of the population lives.

In 2013, the Chilean government sent a proposal to modify the Chilean Electricity Law (described below) to allow the state to promote the interconnection project between the SIC and the SING. In January 2014, the proposal was approved and signed into law by the Chilean President as Law 20,726. The interconnection is expected to be completed between 2018 and 2019.

The operation of electricity generation companies in each of the two major interconnected electricity systems is coordinated by their respective dispatch centers, known as a CDEC, an independent entity that coordinates generators, transmission companies and large customers. CDEC coordinates the operation of its system with an efficiency criterion in which the lowest cost producer available is usually required to satisfy demand at any moment in time. As a result, at any specific level of demand, the appropriate supply will be provided at the lowest possible production cost available in the system. The marginal cost used is the price at which generators trade energy on an hourly basis, involving both their injections into the system and their withdrawals or purchases for supplying their customers.

Principal Regulatory Authorities

The Chilean Ministry of Energy develops and coordinates plans, policies and standards for the proper operation of the sector, approves tariffs and node prices set by the CNE, and regulates the granting of concessions to electricity generation, transmission and distribution companies. The CNE is the technical entity in charge of defining prices, technical standards and regulatory requirements.

The SEF monitors the proper operation of electricity, gas and fuel sectors in compliance with the law in terms of safety, quality, and technical standards.

The Chilean Ministry of Environment is responsible for the development and application of regulatory and policy instruments that provide for the protection of natural resources, the promotion of environmental education and the control of pollution, among other matters. It is also responsible for administering the environmental impact assessment system at the national level, coordinating the preparation of environmental standards and establishing the programs for compliance with the standards.

Chilean antitrust authorities are responsible for preventing, investigating and correcting any threats to free market competition and any anti-competitive practices by potentially monopolistic companies. These authorities include:

• Free Market Competition Tribunal (“TDLC” in its Spanish acronym). This is a special and independent jurisdictional entity, subject to the directive, correctional and economic authority of the Chilean Supreme Court, which functions to prevent, correct and sanction threats to free market competition.

• National Economic Prosecutor (“FNE” in its Spanish acronym). This is the attorney general responsible for economic matters and for investigating and prosecuting all antitrust conduct before the FNE’s resolutory commission and other tribunals.

The panel of experts acts as a tribunal in electricity matters arising from disputes between participants in the electricity market and the regulatory authority in certain tariff processes. It issues enforceable resolutions and comprises experts in industry matters, five engineers or economists and two lawyers, all of whom are elected every six years by the TDLC.

There are also other entities related to the energy sector: the Chilean Nuclear Energy Committee in charge of research, development, use and control of nuclear energy, and the Chilean Energy Efficiency Agency, in charge of promoting energy efficiency.

63

The Electricity Law

General

Since its inception, the Chilean electricity industry has been developed by private sector companies. Nationalization was carried out during the period 1970-73. During the 1980s, the sector was reorganized through the Chilean Electricity Law, known as DFL 1, allowing participation of private capital in the electricity sector. By the end of the 1990s, foreign companies had a majority participation in the Chilean electricity system.

The goal of the Chilean Electricity Law is to provide incentives to maximize efficiency and to provide a simplified regulatory scheme and tariff-setting process that limits the discretionary role of the government by establishing objective criteria for setting prices. The goal is an economically efficient allocation of resources. The regulatory system is designed to provide a competitive rate of return on investment to stimulate private investment, while ensuring the availability of electricity to all who request it.

DFL 1 was published in 1982 and has had only two important changes since then. The first one took place in 2004 to encourage investments in transmission lines. The second one was in 2005 to create long-term contracts between generation and distribution companies as part of a bid process.

The present text of the law was restated in DFL No. 4 of 2006, which is supplemented with a series of regulations and standards.

Limits and Restrictions

The owners of the main transmission system must be constituted as limited liability stock corporations and cannot take part in the electricity generation or distribution businesses.

Individual participation in the Main Transmission System (“STT”) by companies operating in another electricity or unregulated customer segment cannot exceed, directly or indirectly, 8% of the total investment value of the STT. The aggregate participation of all such agents in the STT must never exceed 40% of the investment value.

According to the Chilean Electricity Law, there are no restrictions on market concentration for generation and distribution activities. However, Chilean antitrust authorities have imposed certain measures to increase the transparency within the different companies that form the Enersis group. The FNE’s resolution 667/2002 requires:

• board members of Enersis, Endesa Chile and Chilectra be elected from different and independent groups;

• the external auditors of Enersis, Endesa Chile and Chilectra be different;

• Enersis, Endesa Chile and Chilectra may not merge companies within the Enersis group which operate in electricity generation and distribution; instead, Enersis must continue to maintain both business segments separately through companies that are independent business units; and

• Enersis, Endesa Chile and Chilectra must remain subject to the regulatory authority of the SVS and comply with the regulations applicable to publicly held stock corporations, even if they should lose such designation.

Additionally, in October 2012, Official Letter No. 1479 imposed additional restrictions on Endesa Chile stating that:

(i) the controlling shareholders should refrain from designating those persons who had been directors of Chilectra the prior term, as Endesa Chile directors; and

(ii) Endesa Chile’s management should refrain from designating employees in first and second level positions, that had held the same positions in Chilectra during the six months prior to their designation.

64

In addition, the Water Utility Services Law also sets restrictions on the overlapping of concessions in the same area, setting restrictions on the ownership of the property between sewage services concessions and utilities that are natural monopolies, such as electricity distribution, gas or home telephone networks.

Regulation of Generation Companies

Concessions

The law permits generation activity without a concession. However, companies may apply for a concession to facilitate access to third-party properties. Third-party property owners are entitled to compensation, which may be agreed to by the parties or, if there is no agreement, it may be determined by an administrative proceeding that may be appealed in the Chilean courts.

Dispatch and Pricing

In each transmission system, the pertinent CDEC coordinates the operations of generation companies, in order to minimize the operating costs in the electricity system and monitor the quality of service provided by the generation and transmission companies. Generation companies satisfy their contractual sales requirements with dispatched electricity, whether produced by them or purchased from other generation companies in the spot market.

Sales by Generation Companies to Unregulated Customers

Sales by generation companies may be made to final unregulated customers or to other generation companies under freely negotiated contracts. To balance their contractual obligations with their dispatch, generators have to trade deficit and surplus electricity at the spot market price, which is set hourly by each CDEC, based on the lowest cost of production of the next kWh to be dispatched.

Sales to Distribution Companies and Certain Regulated Customers

Prior to 2005, sales to distribution companies for resale to regulated customers were made through contracts at regulated prices set by the CNE (node prices) in effect at the relevant locations (or nodes) on the interconnected system through which such electricity was supplied. Under Law 20,018Ley Corta II, enacted on May 19, 2005, all new contracts between generation and distribution companies to supply electricity to regulated customers must arise from international bids. The bids must have a maximum energy price offer based on the average price paid by the unregulated customers at the time that the bid takes place, which is calculated twice a year by the CNE. If a first bid is unsuccessful, the CNE may increase this maximum price by an additional 15%. The bids are awarded on a minimum price basis. The average prices associated with these bids are transferred directly to end customers, replacing the regulated node price regime. During the term of the contracts, the energy and capacity prices are indexed according to formulas set forth in the bid documentation and linked to fuel, investment and other costs of energy generation. Under the bid system, all distribution companies have separate electricity contracts for their regulated and unregulated customers.

Due to the bankruptcy of the generating company Campanario in September 2011, certain regulated customers in the central-southern region of the country no longer had electricity contracts. In response, the Chilean government published two resolutions: RM 2288 and RM 239. Pursuant to these resolutions, all generating companies must meet demand from their customers on a pro rata basis to their injections into the system until new contracts are awarded under new tendering processes. As of the date of this Report, only 47% of this energy has been awarded to generation companies until December 2014 (of which 38% was to Endesa Chile and 9% to Gener).

As in most of the countries of the region, the Chilean electricity markets are concentrated on a few big operators. In the generation market, ranked by electricity generation market share, the major participants are as follows: Endesa Chile 29 %, Gener 28%, Colbún 16.5% and GDF Suez 14%, according to CDEC-SIC and CDEC-SING. In the distribution market, ranked by physical sales market share, the major participants are as follows: Chilectra (an Enersis subsidiary) 40%, Compañía General de Electricidad 39%, Saesa Frontel 9% and Chilquinta 9%, according to Empresas Eléctricas A.G.

65

Sales of Capacity to Other Generation Companies

Each CDEC determines a firm capacity for each power plant on an annual basis. Firm capacity is the highest capacity which a generator may supply to the system at certain peak hours, taking into consideration statistical information and accounting for time out of service for maintenance purposes and for extremely dry conditions in the case of hydroelectric plants.

A generation company may be required to purchase or sell capacity in the spot market, depending upon its contractual requirements in relation to the amount of electricity to be dispatched from such company and to its firm capacity.

Regulatory Charges

Chilean laws have not established any specific charge for the electric system. Nevertheless, if the tariff for residential customers increases by more than 5% in a six-month period, the government can establish a subsidy for low-income families. The last governmental subsidy was granted in 2009.

Promotion of Generation from Renewable Energy Sources

On April 1, 2008, Law 20,257 amended Law 19,940 of March 2004, known as the General Electric Services Law. The purpose of the amendment was to promote the use of NCRE. This law defines the different types of technologies that qualify as NCRE and establishes the obligation for generators, between 2010 and 2014, to supply at least 5% of the total energy contracted as of August 31, 2007, to be of a certain type, and to progressively increase this percentage by 0.5 percentage points annually up to a minimum of 10% as of 2024.

On October 22, 2013, Law 20,698 (known as the “20/25 Law”) supported renewable energy sources and modified the previously defined NCRE minimum requirements. This law establishes a mandatory share of renewable energy sources in 2025, calculated as a percentage of the total contracted energy of each generator. In particular, for those contracts signed between 2007 and 2013, the target is 10% in 2024, while for contracts beyond 2013, the target is 20% by 2025.

Incentives and Penalties

If a rationing decree is enacted in response to prolonged periods of electricity shortages, strict penalties may be imposed on generation companies that contravene the decree. A severe drought is not considered aforce majeure event under our service agreements.

Generation companies may also be required to pay fines to the regulatory authorities, as well as to make compensatory payments to electricity customers affected by shortages of electricity. The fines are related to system blackouts due to an electricity generator’s operational problems, including failures related to the coordination duties of all system agents. If generation companies cannot satisfy their contractual commitments to deliver electricity during periods when a rationing decree is in effect and there is no energy available to purchase in the system, the generation company must compensate the customers at a rate known as the “failure cost” determined by the authority in each tariff setting. This failure cost, which is updated semiannually by the CNE, is a measurement of how many final customers would pay for one extra MWh under rationing conditions.

Regulation of Distribution Companies

Concessions

Distribution service concessions give the right to use public areas for building distribution lines. The concessions are given by the Chilean Ministry of Energy for an undefined period. Distribution companies have the obligation to serve and connect the customers that make the requirement in the concession area. The Chilean President can declare a concession expired if the quality of service does not meet certain minimum standards.

66

Energy Purchases

Since 2005, with the enactment of “Ley Corta II”, energy sales between generation and distribution companies have been made by an international auction process. Based on the distribution companies’ projections of increased energy demand, distribution companies auction the projected energy demand three years in advance of the projected year. They can either conduct the auction themselves or as a group with other distribution companies. The CNE supervises the auctions and verifies that the auction bases and the process itself comply with the regulation. The result of the process is “pay as bid”, with an extension up to 12 years.

Distribution Tariffs to Final Customers

The tariffs charged by distribution companies to final customers are determined by the sum of the cost of electricity purchased by the distribution company, a transmission charge and the value added from distribution of electricity (“VAD”), which allows distribution companies to recover their operating costs and includes a return on investment. The price for both generation and distribution capacity sold to customers includes a factor which reflects the simultaneous contribution of each customer to peak capacity demand of the system as a whole. The transmission charge reflects the cost paid for electricity transmission and transformation.

The VAD is based on a so-called “model company” and includes the following: selling, general and administrative distribution costs; maintenance and operating costs of distribution assets; cost of efficient energy losses; and an expected return on investment, before taxes, of 10% per year in real terms based on the replacement cost of assets used for the distribution business.

The CNE selects an actual distribution company and applies efficiency guidelines, which results in a cost structure for a hypothetical model company for each Typical Distribution Area (“TDA”) as described below. The rate is not based on actual costs incurred by any given distribution company, but on investment, operating, maintenance and general administrative standards and overall efficiency of operations for the model company.

Distribution Tariff-Setting Process

The VAD is set every four years. The CNE classifies companies into groups, according to the TDA, based on economic factors that group companies with similar distribution costs due to population density, which determines equipment requirements in the network.

The real return on investment for a distribution company depends on its actual performance relative to the standards chosen by the CNE for the model company. The tariff system allows for a greater return to distribution companies that are more efficient than the model company. Tariff studies are performed by the CNE and distribution companies. Preliminary tariffs are calculated as a weighted average of the results of the CNE-commissioned study and the companies’ study, with the results of the CNE’s study bearing twice the weight of the companies’ study. Preliminary tariffs are then tested to ensure that they provide a rate of return between 6% and 14% of the replacement cost of electricity-related distribution assets for the entire business sector.

Ancillary Electrical Services

In 2013, the CNE concluded the tariff setting process for regulated ancillary services (these are 25 services which include meter rental, disconnection and reconnection of supply, among others). These new prices will apply from the respective decree’s publication and last through 2016.

67

Incentives and Penalties

Distribution companies may be required to compensate final customers if there are shortages of electricity that exceed the authorized standards. These compensatory payments are equal to double the amount of electricity the distribution company failed to provide, using a rate equal to the failure cost.

Regulation in Transmission

The main transmission system consists of 220 kV or higher voltage lines that are used by generators and customers. Every four years, a study is done to evaluate the existing system and to define the expansion plan. On December 31, 2010, the last study was delivered to the CNE. In November 2011, the CNE promulgated Decree 61, which defines the current value of the existing lines to be remunerated for the 2011 to 2014 period. The main transmission system is paid by generators and customers.

According to the modifications to the General Electricity Services Law, the transportation of electricity by main transmission systems and sub-transmission systems are defined as a public service. Therefore, the transmitter has a service obligation and is responsible for the maintenance and improvement of its facilities.

On October 14, 2013, the Electricity Concessions Law was approved, which law aims to streamline the processing of electrical concessions, including, among other things, compensation, taxation and notifications.

Regulation in Subtransmission

Subtransmission systems are defined as voltage lines exceeding 23 kV. There are seven subtransmission systems defined by decree. The subtransmission systems are paid mainly by customers according to the values fixed by decree of the Ministry of Energy. Generators and unregulated customers pay only for the lines they use in each system. In April 2013, Decree 14 was promulgated, which established a tariff schedule from 2011 through 2014.

Environmental Regulation

The Chilean constitution grants citizens the right to live in a pollution-free environment. It further provides that certain other constitutional rights may be limited in order to protect the environment. Chile has numerous laws, regulations, decrees and municipal ordinances that address environmental considerations. Among them are regulations relating to waste disposal (including the discharge of liquid industrial wastes), the establishment of industries in areas in which they may affect public health, and the protection of water for human consumption.

Environmental Law 19,300 was enacted in 1994 and implemented by several rules, such as the Environmental Impact Assessment System Rule issued in 1997 and modified in 2001. This law requires companies to conduct an environmental impact study and a declaration of any future generation or transmission projects.

In January 2010, Law 19,300 was modified by Law 20,417, which introduced changes in the environmental assessment process and in the public institutions involved, principally creating the Chilean Ministry of Environment and the Superintendency of Environment. Consequently, environmental assessment processes are coordinated by this entity and the Environmental Assessment Service.

For more information about Chile’s NCRE regulations, see “— Promotion of Generation from Renewable Energy Sources”.

In June 2011, the Ministry of Environment published Decree 13, emission standards for thermoelectric plants applicable to generation units of at least 50 MW, in theDiario Oficial, a governmental publication. The object of this regulation is to control atmospheric emissions of particulate matter (MP), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2) and mercury (Hg), in order to prevent and protect the health of the population and protect the environment. Existing emission sources will have to meet emission limits as established in the regulation for MP emissions within two and a half years from the date this decree was published (December 2013) and for SO2 and NOx emissions, within four years in highly polluted areas and within five years elsewhere.

68

In June 2012, Law 20,600 created the Environmental Courts, special jurisdictional courts subject to the control of the Chilean Supreme Court. Their primary function is to resolve environmental disputes within their jurisdiction and look into other matters that are submitted for their attention under the law. The law created three such courts, the first of which began operating in December 2012 and the other two of which began operating in June 2013.

On December 28, 2012, the Superintendency of Environment was formally created and began to exercise its powers of enforcement and sanctions pursuant to Chilean environmental regulations.

Water Rights

Companies in Chile must pay an annual fee for unused water rights. License fees already paid may be recovered through monthly tax credits commencing on the start-up date of the project associated with the water right. The maximum license fees that may be recovered are those paid during the eight years before the start-up date.

The Chilean constitution considers water as a national public good on which real utilization rights are defined; that is similar to holding the private property rights over water, as set forth in article 19, paragraph 24: “The rights of individuals over water, recognized or constituted in accordance with the law, grant their holders ownership over such rights”. Notwithstanding the foregoing, paragraph 24 also elaborates on the societal function of the private property so that water rights are subject to legal limitations.

Argentina

Industry Overview

Industry Structure

In the Argentine Wholesale Electricity Market (“Argentine MEM” in its Spanish acronym) there are four categories of local agents (generators, transmitters, distributors, and large customers) and external agents (traders of generation and traders of demand) who are allowed to buy and sell electricity as well as related products.

The following chart shows the relationships among the various participants in the Argentine MEM:

The generation sector was organized on a competitive basis until March 2013, with independent generating companies selling their output in the Argentine MEM spot market, through private contracts to purchasers in the Argentine MEM contract market or to CAMMESA, which is the entity in charge of the operation of the Argentine MEM, through special transactions like contracts under Resolutions SE 220/2007 and 724/2008.

69

On March 26, 2013 the Secretariat for Energy published Resolution 95/2013 that set out a regulated remuneration scheme for power generation activity beginning retroactively from February 2013. The main features of the Resolution are as follows:

• It applies to generators, co-generators and self-generators except for power plants entered into operation after 2005, nuclear generation, cross-border hydro generation.

• CAMMESA, the market operator, will be the single buyer/seller for the fuel needed for plant operations. This implies that market agents will not be allowed to trade commodities.

• Free bilateral trading is suspended: large customers will have to buy electricity directly from CAMMESA (no change of supply for residential customers, they will still be served by distribution companies).

• Generators are to receive a regulated remuneration, which should cover fixed and variable costs and include an additional remuneration.

The transmission sector operates under monopoly conditions and is comprised of several companies to whom the Argentine government grants concessions. One concessionaire operates and maintains the highest voltage facilities and eight concessionaires operate and maintain high and medium voltage facilities, to which generation plants, distribution systems and large customers are connected. The international interconnected transmission systems also require concessions granted by the Argentine Secretariat of Energy. Transmission companies are authorized to charge different tolls for their services.

Distribution is regarded as a public service operating under monopoly conditions, and is comprised of companies that have been granted concessions by the Argentine government. Distribution companies have the obligation to make electricity available to end customers within a specific concession area, regardless of whether the customer has a contract with the distributor or directly with a generator. Accordingly, these companies have regulated tariffs and are subject to quality service specifications. Distribution companies may obtain electricity on the Argentine MEM’s spot market, at a price called “seasonal price”, which is defined by the Argentine Secretariat of Energy as the cap for the costs of electricity bought by distributors that can be passed through to regulated customers.

There are two electricity distribution areas subject to federal concessions. The concessionaires are Edesur (one of our subsidiaries) and Edenor (which is not a related company), both of which are located in the greater Buenos Aires area. The local distribution areas are subject to concessions granted by the provincial or municipal authorities. However, all distribution companies acting on the Argentine MEM must operate under its rules.

Regulated customers are supplied by distributors at regulated tariffs.

“Large Customers” are classified into three categories: major large customers, minor large customers and private large customers. Each of these categories of customers has different requirements with respect to purchases of their energy demand. For example, major large customers are required to purchase 50% of their demand through supply contracts and the remainder in the spot market, while minor large customers and private large customers are required to purchase all of their demand through supply contracts. Large customers participate in CAMMESA by appointing two acting and two alternate directors through the Argentine Association of Electric Power for Large Customers.

There is one interconnected system, the Argentine Interconnection System (“Argentine SADI”), and smaller systems that provide electricity to specific areas. According to the Argentine National Institute of Statistics and Census (“INDEC” in its Spanish acronym), 99.2% of the energy required by the country is supplied by the Argentine SADI interconnected system and only 0.8% is supplied by isolated systems.

70

Principal Regulatory Authorities

The Argentine Ministry of Federal Planning, Public Investment and Services, through the Argentine Secretariat of Energy, is primarily responsible for studying and analyzing the behavior of energy markets, preparing the strategic planning with respect to electricity, hydrocarbons and other fuels, promoting policies to increase competition and improve efficiency in the assignment of resources, leading actions for applying the sector policy, orienting new operators to the general interest, respecting the rational exploitation of the resources and the preservation of the environment.

The Electricity National Regulatory Agency (“ENRE” in its Spanish acronym) carries out the measures necessary for meeting national policy objectives with respect to the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity. Its principal objectives are to protect the rights of customers, promote competitiveness in production, encourage investments that assure long-term supply; promote free access, non-discrimination and the generalized use of the transmission and distribution services; regulate transmission and distribution services to ensure fair and reasonable tariffs, and encourage private investment in production, transmission, and distribution, ensuring the competitiveness of the markets where possible. ENRE directly controls the management of Edenor and Edesur as distribution companies operating under a national concession. In the case of Edesur, on July 12, 2012, ENRE temporarily appointed an overseer for 45 business days, a term that was extended for successive periods of the same duration, in order to monitor and control all acts of management of the Company. ENRE resolution 243/13 increased the term from 45 to 90 business days and it may be extended further. The Vice President of ENRE was initially appointed to oversee Edesur. However, pursuant to ENRE Resolution 31/2014 passed January 30, 2014, the President of ENRE will oversee Edesur for 90 business days, which may be extended further.

The principal functions of the Administrative Company for the Wholesale Electricity Market (“CAMMESA”) are the coordination of dispatch operations, the establishment of wholesale prices and the administration of economic transactions made through the SIN. It is also responsible for executing the economic dispatch through economic considerations and rationality in the administration of energy resources, coordinating the centralized operation of the SIN to guarantee its security and quality, and managing the Argentine MEM, in order to ensure transparency through the participation of all the players involved and with respect to the respective regulations.

The principal functions of the Argentine Federal Electricity Council are the following: (i) managing specific funds for the electricity sector and (ii) advising the national executive authority and the provincial governments with respect to the electricity industry, the priorities in performing studies and works, concessions and authorizations, and prices and tariffs in the electricity sector. It also provides advice regarding modifications resulting from legislation referring to the electricity industry.

The Federal Environmental Council is an institutional branch of the federal government empowered to address environmental problems and solutions in Argentina. It has legal authority to coordinate the development of environmental policy among member states. The member states adopt regulations or rules that are issued by the Assembly, which are issued as resolutions.

The Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development, a member of the Federal Environment Council, assists the Chief of Cabinet of Ministers in the implementation of environmental measures and articulates its insertion in the ministries and other areas of the national public administration. It seeks to foster rational exploitation and sovereignty over Argentina’s natural resources with consideration to fairness and social inclusion. The Secretariat is involved in environmental planning and preservation, planning and implementation of national environmental management in the implementation of sustainable development, rational use of non-renewable resources and the diagnosis of environmental issues in coordination with different areas of the government.

The Electricity Law

General

The Argentine electricity industry was originally developed by private companies. As a result of service problems, the government began to intervene in the sector in the 1950s and initiated a nationalization process. Law 15,336/60 was passed to organize the sector and establish the federal legal framework for the start of major transmission and generation projects. Many state companies were created within this framework in order to carry out various hydroelectric and nuclear projects.

71

As a result of the electricity shortage in 1989, the following laws were passed starting in 1990: Law 23,696 (“State Reform”), Law 23,697 (“Economic Emergency”) and Law 24,065 (“Electricity Framework”).

The objective of the new legislations was essentially to replace the vertically-integrated system based on a centrally-planned state monopoly with a competitive system based on the market and indicative planning.

Regulatory Developments: The Industry After the Public Emergency Law

Law 25,561, the Public Emergency Law, was enacted in 2002 to manage the economic crisis that began that year. It forced the renegotiation of public service contracts (such as electricity transmission and distribution concession contracts) and imposed the conversion of U.S. dollar denominated obligations into Argentine pesos at a pegged rate of Ar$ 1.00 per US$ 1.00. The mandatory conversion of transmission and distribution tariffs from U.S. dollars to Argentine pesos at this pegged rate (compared to the market exchange rate at that time of approximately Ar$ 3.00 per US$ 1.00) and the regulatory measures that cap and reduce the spot and seasonal prices hindered the pass-through of generation variable costs in the tariffs to end customers.

The Public Emergency Law also empowered the Argentine government to implement additional monetary, financial and foreign exchange measures to overcome the economic crisis in the medium term. These measures have been periodically extended. Law 26,729, which was enacted in December 2011, extended the measures until December 31, 2013 and Law 26,896, enacted in October 2013 further extended the measures until December 31, 2015.

The Argentine Secretariat of Energy introduced several regulatory measures aimed at correcting the effects of the devaluation into the Argentine MEM’s costs and prices and to reduce the price paid by the end customers.

Resolution SE 240/2003 changed the method for calculating spot prices by decoupling such prices from the marginal cost of operation. Prior to this resolution, spot prices in the Argentine MEM were typically fixed by units operating with natural gas during the warm season (from September through April) and units operating with liquid fuel/diesel in the winter (May through August). Due to restrictions on natural gas supply, winter prices were higher and affected by the price of imported fuels priced in U.S. dollars. Resolution SE 240/2003 sought to avoid price indexation pegged to the U.S. dollar and, although generation dispatch is still based on actual fuels used, the calculation of the spot price under the resolution is defined as if all dispatched generation units did not have the existing restrictions on natural gas supply. In addition, water value is not considered if its opportunity cost is higher than the cost of generating with natural gas. The resolution also set a cap on the spot price at Ar$ 120 per MWh, which was valid until the adoption of Resolution 95/2013. The real variable costs of thermal units burning liquid fuels were paid by CAMMESA through the Transitory Additional Dispatch Cost (Sobrecosto transitorio de despacho, or “STD”) plus a margin of Ar$ 2.5 per MWh, according to the Resolutions SE 6,866/2009 and 6,169/2010, that came into effect in May 2010.

The government has avoided the increase in electricity tariffs to end customers and seasonal prices have been maintained substantially fixed in Argentine pesos. In contrast, gas producers have received price revisions by the authority and thereby were able to recover part of the value that they lost as a result of the 2002 devaluation.

Under this system, CAMMESA sells energy to distributors who pay seasonal prices and buys energy from generators at spot prices that recognize rising gas prices at a contractual price defined by the instructions of the Argentine Secretariat of Energy. To overcome this imbalance, the Argentine Secretariat of Energy — through Resolution SE 406/2003 — only allows payments to generators for amounts collected from the purchasers in the spot market. This resolution set a priority of payment for different services, such as capacity payment, fuel cost and energy sales margin, among others. As a result, CAMMESA accumulates debt with generators while the system gives a distorted price incentive to the market that encourages electricity consumption but discourages investments to satisfy the growth in electricity demand, including investments in transmission capacity. Additionally, electricity generators experience a reduction of estimated income from contract prices because of the reduction of the spot price.

72

The Argentine government has gradually reversed its decision to freeze distribution tariffs. During 2011, various resolutions authorizing the elimination of electricity and natural gas subsidies were issued. However, the subsidy elimination has been applied to only 5% of the demand. For further details, see “— Sales to Distribution Companies and Certain Regulated Customers” below.

In order to enhance the energy supply, the Argentine Secretariat of Energy created different schemes to sell “more reliable energy”. Resolution 1,281/2006 created the Energy Plus Service Program, which was designed to increase generation capacity in order to meet growth in electricity demand over the “Base Demand”, which was the demand for electricity in 2005.

Resolutions SE 220/2007 and 724/2008 gave thermal generators the opportunity to reduce some of the adverse effects of Resolution SE 406/2003 by entering into MEM Supply Commitment Contracts, (“CCAM” in its Spanish acronym). Under these resolutions, a thermal generator can perform maintenance or repowering investments to improve the availability of its units and add additional capacity to the system. After authorization, the thermal generator can then sign a CCAM at prices that would permit the recovery of such capital expenditures. Additionally, energy sales through a CCAM receive payment priority compared with spot energy sales under Resolution 406/2003). Generators with a CCAM can supply energy to CAMMESA for up to 36 months, renewable only for an additional period of six months.

During 2009, Resolution SE 762/2009 created the National Hydroelectric Program to promote the construction of new hydro plants. The program enables authorized generators to enter into energy supply contracts with CAMMESA for up to 15 years at prices that would allow for the recoupment of their investment.

The Argentine government has adopted several other measures to encourage new investments, including the following: auctions to expand the capacity of natural gas transportation and electricity transmission; the implementation of certain projects for the construction of power plants; the creation of fiduciary funds to finance these expansions; and the awarding of contracts with renewable energy, called the “GENREN program”. For more details, refer to “— Environmental Regulation” below. In addition, Law 26,095/2006 created specific charges that must be paid by end customers, which are used to finance new electricity and gas infrastructure projects. The Argentine government has also enacted regulations to encourage the rational and efficient use of electricity.

Since the implementation of Law 24,065 (“Electricity Framework”), the generation sector has sold the electricity it generates on the wholesale spot market and the private contract market. However, a series of resolutions have been published in recent years that have permitted the Argentine government and generators to sign contracts for the incorporation of new generation and/or maintenance of existing plants to guarantee the availability of the units, all in accordance with Resolutions 146/02, 220/07, 724/08 and 200/09.

On August 24, 2012, the Argentine government informed electricity sector companies that it would reform the Argentine MEM and end the marginalist system of the 1990s. To implement these changes, a Strategic Planning and Coordination Commission of the National Hydrocarbons Investment Plan was created. The principal change in the generation sector is the evolution of the “liberalized marginalist” model into a “Cost Plus” model in accordance with the following “Declared Principles”: (i) any income shall be applied to each company based on the sum of its equity and debt, less redundant assets, (ii) a “Reasonable Profit” would be recognized, and (iii) efficient operating costs would be recognized.

With this new regulatory model, the Argentine government will have more information and control over (i) the profitability of companies, (ii) the quality of service, and (iii) the supply of fuels through CAMMESA, which will be the sole supplier of fuels (through imports and a contract with YPF S.A., an Argentine company engaged in the exploration, distribution and sale of petroleum and its derivatives).

73

As mentioned above, Resolution 95/2013 attempted to implement the majority of the reforms announced in 2012 by moving from a marginalist system to a regulated system, in which an electricity generation company’s income is driven by regulated streams of revenues. Based on the new regulation, generators’ remuneration is now made up of the following items, which vary depending on the method of generation:

• Fixed costs: capacity remuneration subject to the achievement of a target availability.

• Variable costs: variable remuneration for operation and maintenance costs only, given that electricity generators do not incur fuel cost which is managed by CAMMESA.

• Additional remuneration: part is paid in cash to the electricity generators, and the remainder is accumulated in a fund that will be used to finance investments in new generation facilities.

FONINVEMEM

Resolution SE 712/2004 created FONINVEMEM, a fund whose purpose is to increase electricity capacity/generation within the Argentine MEM. Pursuant to Resolution SE 406/2003, the Argentine Secretariat of Energy decided to pay generators for the spot prices up to the amount available in a stabilization fund, after collecting the funds from the purchasers in the spot market at seasonal prices, which were lower than spot prices for the same period. FONINVEMEM would receive the differences between spot prices and payments to sellers, according to Resolution SE 406/ 2003 from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2006. CAMMESA was appointed to manage FONINVEMEM.

Pursuant to Resolution SE 1,193/2005, all private generators in the Argentine MEM were called upon to participate in the construction, operation and maintenance of the electricity generation plants to be built with the funds from FONINVEMEM, consisting of two combined -cycle generation plants of approximately 825 MW each .

Due to the insufficient resources to construct the plants, Resolution SE 564/2007 required all of the Argentine MEM’s private sector generators to commit to FONINVEMEM by including the differences between spot prices and payments made pursuant to Resolution SE 406/2003 for an additional period ending December 31, 2007. These plants were completed in 2010 and are powered by natural gas or alternative fuels.

The Energy Plus Program

In September 2006, the Argentine Secretariat of Energy issued Resolution SE 1,281/2006 in an effort to respond to the continued increase in energy demand following Argentina’s economic recovery after the crisis. With this resolution the Argentine government started the Energy Plus Program. which principal objectives are to (i) create incentives to construct electricity generation plants and (ii) ensure that energy available in the market is used primarily to service residential customers and industrial and commercial customers with an energy demand is at or below 300 kW as well as those who do not have access to other viable energy alternatives.

The resolution also established the price large customers are required to pay for excess demand that are not covered by a contract under the Energy Plus Program, which is equal to the marginal cost of operations. This marginal cost is equal to the generation cost of the last generation unit dispatched to supply the incremental demand for electricity at any given time.

Agreement to Manage and Operate Projects

On November 25, 2010, the Argentine Secretariat of Energy signed an agreement with several generation companies, including Enersis’ subsidiaries, in order to: (i) increase thermoelectric unit availability, (ii) increase energy and capacity prices and (iii) develop new generation units through the contribution of outstanding debts of CAMMESA owed to the generation companies.

This agreement seeks to accomplish the following: (i) continue the reform of the Argentine MEM; (ii) enable the incorporation of new generation to meet the increased demand for energy in the Argentine MEM (pursuant to this agreement, Endesa Chile’s subsidiaries, together with the SADESA Group and Duke, formed a company to develop the combined-cycle project with a capacity of approximately 800 MW at the Vuelta de Obligado thermal

74

plant); (iii) determine a mechanism to pay the generators’ sales settlements with maturity dates to be determined (“LVFVDs” in the Spanish acronym), which represent generators’ claims for the period from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2011; and (iv) determine the method for recognizing the total remuneration due to generators.

On October 24, 2012, the contract for the turnkey supply and construction of the Vuelta de Obligado plant was entered into among General Electric Internacional Inc. and General Electric Internacional Inc., Argentina branch, and the Argentine Secretariat of Energy.

The project also includes the expansion of the Río Coronda 500 kV transformer station which connects to the Argentine Interconnected System (“Argentine NIS”), the construction of four new fuel tanks, the construction of a gas pipeline to supply natural gas from the national network, and maintenance of the plant during the single and combined-cycle operation periods for a period of ten years.

Limits and Restrictions

To preserve competition in the electricity market, participants in the electricity sector are subject to vertical and horizontal restrictions, depending on the market segment in which they operate.

Vertical Integration Restrictions

The vertical integration restrictions apply to companies that intend to participate simultaneously in different sub-sectors of the electricity market. These vertical integration restrictions were imposed by Law 24,065, and apply differently to each sub-sector as described below:

Generators

• Neither a generation company nor any of its controlled or controlling companies can be an owner, majority shareholder or the controlling entity of a transmission company; and

• Since a distribution company cannot own generation units, a holder of generation units cannot own distribution concessions. However, the shareholders of the electricity generator may own an entity that holds distribution units, either by themselves or through any other entity created with the purpose of owning or controlling distribution units.

Transmitters

• Neither a transmission company nor any of its controlled or controlling companies can be an owner, majority shareholder or the controlling company of a generation company;

• Neither a transmission company nor any of its controlled or controlling companies can be an owner, majority shareholder or the controlling company of a distribution company; and

• Transmission companies cannot buy or sell electric energy.

Distributors

• Neither a distribution company nor any of its controlled or controlling companies can be an owner, majority shareholder or the controlling company of a transmission company; and

• A distribution company cannot own generation units. However, the shareholders of an electricity distributor may own generation units either by themselves or through any other entity created with the purpose of owning or controlling generation units.

75

Horizontal Integration Restrictions

In addition to the vertical integration restrictions described above, distribution and transmission companies are subject to the following horizontal integration restrictions:

Transmitters

• Two or more transmission companies can merge or be part of a same economic group only if they obtain an express approval from the ENRE. Such approval is also necessary when a transmission company intends to acquire shares of another transmission company. Pursuant to the concession agreements that govern the services rendered by private companies operating transmission lines between 132 kW and 140 kW, the service is rendered by the concessionaire on an exclusive basis in certain areas indicated in the concession agreement. Pursuant to the concession agreements that govern the services rendered by the private companies operating the high-tension transmission services of at least 220 kW, such companies must render the service on an exclusive basis and are entitled to render the service throughout the entire country, without territorial limitations.

Distributors

• Two or more distribution companies can merge or be part of a same economic group only if they obtain an express approval from the ENRE. Such approval is necessary when a distribution company intends to acquire shares of another transmission or distribution company; and

• Pursuant to the concession agreements that govern the services rendered by private companies operating distribution networks, the service is rendered by the concessionaire on an exclusive basis in certain areas indicated in the concession agreement.

Regulation of Generation Companies

Concessions

Hydroelectric generators with a normal generation capacity exceeding 500kW must obtain a concession to use public water sources. Concessions may be granted for a fixed or an indefinite term.

Such concession-holders have the right to: (i) take control of the private properties within the concession area (subject to general laws and local regulations) that are necessary to create reservoirs as well as underground or above ground supply-line and release channels, (ii) flood lands that are necessary to raise water levels, and (iii) request the authorities to make use of the powers conferred in article 10 of Law 15,336 in cases where it is absolutely necessary to appropriate the property of a third-party that was not part of the concession and the concession-holder has failed to reach an agreement with such third-party.

Dispatch and Pricing

CAMMESA controls the coordination of dispatch operations and the administration of the Argentine MEM’s economic transactions. All generators that are Argentine MEM agents must be connected to the Argentine NIS and are obliged to comply with the dispatch order to generate and deliver energy to the Argentine NIS. The emergency regulations enacted after the Argentine crisis in 2001 had a significant impact on energy prices. Among the measures implemented pursuant to the emergency regulations were the specification of prices in the Argentine MEM and the requirement that all spot prices be calculated based on the price of natural gas, even in circumstances where alternative fuel such as diesel is purchased to meet demand due to the lack of supply of natural gas.

The introduction of the Resolution 95/2013, (see “Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — Electricity Industry Regulatory Framework.— Argentina — Industry Overview” and “— Regulatory Developments: the Industry After the Public Emergency Law”), suppressed the market for energy transactions among generators, large customers and traders. This resolution defines a regulated remuneration scheme for each type of technology used in power generation.

76

Seasonal Prices

The emergency regulations also made significant changes to the seasonal prices charged to distributors in the Argentine MEM, including the implementation of a cap (which varies depending on the category of customer) on the cost of electricity charged by CAMMESA to distributors at a price significantly below the spot price charged by generators. These prices have not changed since November 2008.

Pursuant to Resolution SE 1,301/2011, which announced the elimination of subsidies, the Argentine MEM’s seasonal reference prices for non-subsidized electricity were published in November 2011. This resolution also provided for the (i) discontinuation of the practice of charging subsidized prices for non-residential customers based on their payment capacity and economic activity; (ii) creation of a Register of Exceptions including a list of customers exempt from the subsidy elimination, provided that they can certify their inability to bear the seasonal reference prices for non-subsidized electricity; and (iii) the identification of the National State Subsidy, requiring CAMMESA to explicitly identify the subsidies that it provides to each level of demand. Under the resolution, distributors are also required to notify residential customers that will be affected by the elimination of subsidies.

Stabilization Fund

The stabilization fund, managed by CAMMESA, was created to absorb the difference between purchases by distributors at seasonal prices and payments to generators for energy sales at the spot price. When the spot price is lower than the seasonal price, the stabilization fund increases and when the spot price is higher than the seasonal price, the stabilization fund decreases. The outstanding balance of this fund at any given time reflects the accumulation of differences between the seasonal price and the hourly energy price in the spot market. The stabilization fund is required to maintain a minimum balance to cover payments to generators if prices in the spot market during the quarter exceed the seasonal price.

The stabilization fund has been adversely affected as a result of the modifications to the spot price and the seasonal price made by the emergency regulations, pursuant to which seasonal prices were set below spot prices resulting in large deficits in the stabilization fund. These deficits have been financed by the Argentine government through loans to CAMMESA and with FONINVEMEM funds, but these continue to be insufficient to cover the differences between the spot price and the seasonal price.

Sales to Distribution Companies and Regulated Customers

In order to stabilize the prices for distribution, the market uses the seasonal price as the energy price to be paid by distributors for their purchases of electricity traded in the spot market. This is a fixed price determined every six months by the Argentine Secretariat of Energy based on CAMMESA’s recommended seasonal price level for the next period according to its estimated spot price. CAMMESA estimates this price by evaluating its expected supply, demand and available capacity, as well as other factors. The seasonal price is maintained for at least 90 days. Since 2002, the Argentine Secretariat of Energy has been approving seasonal prices lower than those recommended by CAMMESA.

At the end of 2011, the Argentine government issued various resolutions in order to being a process of reducing subsidies to gas, electricity and water tariffs. These resolutions provide for, among other things, the (i) approval of the seasonal programming of regulated tariffs for the period from November 2011 to April 2012, (ii) establishment of a new non-subsidized seasonal price, which increased from Ar$ 243 per MWh to Ar$ 320 per MWh, (iii) listing of economic activities that are subject to the reduction in subsidies, (iv) creation of a register recording the exceptions to the reduction in subsidies, (v) establishment of the effective date for the new tariffs as of January 1, 2012, and (vi) provisions for voluntarily renouncing gas, electricity and water subsidies through an online system.

77

Specific Regulatory Charges for Electricity Companies

The authority to impose regulatory charges in Argentina is administratively divided among the federal, provincial and the municipal governments. Therefore, the tax charge varies according to where the customer lives.

Incentives and Penalties

The Energy Plus Service Program, part of the Energy Plus Program, is provided by generators that have (i) installed new generation capacity or (ii) connected previously unconnected existing generation capacity to the Argentine NIS. All “Large Customers” that had a higher demand than their Base Demand as of November 1, 2006 were required to enter into a contract with the Energy Plus Service Program to cover their excess demand. Large Customers that did not enter into such contracts are required to pay additional amounts for any consumption that exceeds the Base Demand. The prices under the contracts with Energy Plus Service Program must be approved by the relevant authorities. Unregulated customers that were unable to secure an Energy Plus Service contract are able to request CAMMESA to conduct an auction in order to satisfy their demand.

Regulation of Distribution Companies

Concessions

Distributors are companies holding a concession to distribute electricity to customers (concessions are given to distributors by the jurisdiction where they operate, national, provincial or municipal). Distributors are required to supply any and all demand of electricity in their exclusive areas of concession at tariffs and under conditions in accordance with the relevant local regulations. Penalties for failing to supply the electricity demand are included in the concession agreements. Concessions are issued for distribution and retail sale, with specific terms for the concessionaire stated in the contract. The concession periods are divided into “management periods” that allow the concessionaire to give up the concession at certain intervals.

Energy Purchases

The Argentine Secretariat of Energy, through Resolution SE 1,301/2011, reduced the state subsidy of the Argentine MEM for the period from November 2011 to April 2012. This modification has been applied gradually to different segments of residential customers in order to avoid abrupt changes in billing. This process remained practically frozen from March 2012 and is only being applied to approximately 8% of customers.

Through Resolution SE 2,016/2012, the Argentine Secretariat of Energy approved seasonal prices for the period from November 2012 to April 2013. The resolution sets a sole monomic price (combining both energy and capacity) to value all purchases on the Argentine MEM by every distributor in the country and established the regulatory combining bodies and/or authorized entities that are responsible for instructing the distributors in their jurisdiction so that the distributors may correctly apply the seasonal reference prices to their respective price tables.

Distribution Tariff-Setting Process

Distribution under national jurisdiction and transmission companies have been renegotiating contracts since 2005 and although tariffs were partially and temporarily established, definitive tariffs are still pending. As a result, although the terms to define energy prices pursuant to the Argentine Electricity Act are still in force, their implementation reflects the measures taken by the authorities that reduce compensation for all electricity companies. On the other hand, distribution companies under provincial or municipal jurisdiction have seen their tariffs adjusted by local authorities.

During 2006, our subsidiary Edesur and Edenor (not related to us), the largest Argentine distributors, entered into an “Agreement for Renegotiation of Concession Contract”. This agreement established, among other things, (i) a transitional tariff regime contingent on the quality of service and (ii) an Integral Rate Revision Process (“RTI” in its Spanish acronym) to be implemented by ENRE according to Law 25,561 that would set the conditions for a new tariff regime for a five-year period. In December 2009, Edesur presented to ENRE its tariff proposal pursuant to the

78

RTI process and also submitted support studies in accordance with the requirements established by Resolution ENRE 467/2008. This presentation only included the income requirements and did not include rate proposals, which were later presented to ENRE in May 2010. As of the date of this Report, ENRE has not defined new tariffs and the transitional tariff regime remains in effect.

Resolution 45/2010 of the Argentine Secretariat of Energy determined bonus payments to residential customers under the Energy Efficiency Program (“PUREE” in its Spanish acronym), particularly to those with a demand that is less than 1,000 kWh during a two month period. Puree was created in 2004 and established bonuses and penalties to customers depending on the level of energy savings. The net difference between the bonuses and penalties was originally deposited to the stabilization fund but this was subsequently modified at the request of Edesur and Edenor. The Argentine Secretariat of Energy authorized Edesur and Edenor to use all of such amounts to compensate for the cost variations that were not passed on to the tariffs paid by regulated customers. ENRE monitors these distribution costs with a mechanism called PUREE

Edesur’s and Edenor’s distribution tariffs have been frozen since July 2008. Combined with a constant increase in costs due to inflation, this has left Edesur in a very delicate financial position. As a result, Edesur made a request in July 2012 for a special payment plan for energy purchases to CAMMESA.

In 2012, the Argentine Secretariat of Energy issued Resolution 3,787/2012 in order to facilitate financing for necessary investments to the distribution system. The resolution authorized CAMMESA to provide financing for high voltage projects in 2012 investment plan pursuant to the mechanism in Resolution 146/2002.

At the end of 2012, the ENRE issued Resolution ENRE 347/2012 titled “Trust for Financing Distribution Works” (“FOCEDE” in its Spanish acronym). The resolution mandated the formation of a trust with funds collected from customers’ payments in order to finance necessary investments infrastructure, including any maintenance works to be carried out in the concession area. The funds collected from customers are to be differentiated depending on customer category and will be taken into consideration by the ENRE when it carries out the RTI process. The trust contract and its operative manual agreement were signed by Edesur on November 29, 2012 and December 18, 2012, respectively.

On May 7 2013, the Secretariat of Energy approved the Resolution 250/2013 which defined the residual value of the MMC, funds that are owed to Edesur and Edenor , allowing the use of owed funds to pay debts that the companies incurred under the PUREE program and other debts that Edesur and Edenor accrued. The resulting balance is allocated to a specific fund created in November 2012 to finance investments in the distribution network. Such a compensation mechanism has been allowed up to February 2013. The Secretariat of Energy has retained the power to extend, either partially or entirely, the provisions of the Resolution 250/2013 on the basis of the information received from ENRE and from CAMMESA. On November 6, 2013 the Secretariat of Energy’s Note 6852 authorized Edesur to receive compensation from the MMC to pay debts that were accumulated as a result of the PUREE program for the period March-September 2013.

Penalties

The distributors are subject to three types of penalties:

1) Quality of service penalties related to normal operation such as temporary interruptions, technical, and commercial services;

2) Extraordinary penalties, at the discretion of ENRE, apply when distributors do not comply with their service obligations (e.g., blackouts); and

3) Supply penalties related to the system as a whole including generation, transmission, and distribution intended to compensate the customers. The latter are temporarily suspended because the system is not generating enough electricity.

79

Regulation in Transmission

The transmission sector is regulated based on the principles established in Law 24,065 and the terms of the concession granted to Transener S.A. (not an affiliated company) under Decree 2,743/92. Due to technological reasons, the transmission sector is heavily affected by economies of scale that limit competition. As a result, the transmission sector operates under monopoly conditions and is subject to considerable regulation.

Natural Gas Market

Since the emergency economic measures of 2002, the lack of investment in natural gas production forced the system to burn increasing amounts of liquid fuels.

The Argentine government has adopted different measures to improve the natural gas supply. Since 2004, local gas producers and the Argentine government have entered into various agreements to guarantee gas supply. The last agreement was signed in July 2009 and resulted in a 30% increase in the natural gas price for power generators until December 2009. In addition, Argentina and Bolivia entered into a 20-year agreement in 2006 that guarantees Argentina’s right to receive up to 28 million cubic meters of natural gas on a daily basis.

The Electronic Gas Market (“MEG” in its Spanish acronym) was also recently created to increase the transparency of physical and commercial operations in the spot market.

Electricity Exports and Imports

In order to give priority to the internal market supply, the Argentine Secretariat of Energy adopted additional measures that restricted electricity and gas exports. Resolution SE 949/2004 established measures that allowed agents to export and import electricity under very restricted conditions. These measures prevented generators from satisfying their export commitments.

The Argentine Secretariat of Energy published Disposition 27/2004, together with related resolutions and decrees, which created a plan to ration natural gas exports and the use of transport capacity. These measures restricted gas delivery to Chile and Brazil. These restrictions are expected to continue as Resolution Enargas 1,410, which was issued in October 2010, reinforced such restrictions on gas distribution to certain customers. Specifically, the resolution mandated that the distribution of gas be made in the following order, from highest to lowest priority: (i) residential and commercial customers, (ii) the compressed natural gas market, (iii) large customers, (iv) thermal generator units, and (v) exports.

Environmental Regulation

Electricity facilities are subject to federal and local environmental laws and regulations, including Law 24,051, the “Hazardous Waste Law” and its ancillary regulations.

Certain reporting and monitoring obligations and emission standards are imposed on the electricity sector. Failure to satisfy these requirements entitles the Argentine government to impose penalties such as suspension of operations which, in case of public services, could result in the cancellation of concessions.

Law 26,190, enacted in 2007, defined the use of nonconventional renewable energy for electricity production as a national interest and set as a target 8% market share for generation from renewable energies within a term of 10 years. During 2009, the government took actions to reach this objective by publishing Resolution 712/ 2009 and launching an international auction to promote the installation of up to 1,000 MW of renewable energy capacity. This resolution created a mechanism to sell renewable energy through fifteen-year contracts with CAMMESA under special price conditions through ENARSA. In June 2010, the “GENREN program” awarded a total of 895 MW, distributed in the following manner: 754 MW of wind power, 110 MW of bio-fuels, 11 MW of mini-hydro, and 20 MW of solar units. The prices awarded vary from US$ 150 per MWh (for mini-hydro units) to US$ 598 per MWh (for solar units). In 2011, the Argentine Secretariat of Energy issued Resolution 108/11 which allowed CAMMESA to sign contracts directly with generators of renewable energy on conditions similar to Resolution 712/ 2009.

80

Brazil

Industry Overview

Industry Structure

Brazil’s electricity industry is organized into one large interconnected electricity system, the Brazilian NIS, which comprises most of the regions of Brazil, and several other small isolated systems.

The following chart shows the relationships among the various participants in the Brazilian NIS:

Generation, transmission, distribution and trading are legally separated activities in Brazil.

The generation sector is organized on a competitive basis, with independent generators selling their output through private contracts with distributors, traders or unregulated customers. Differences are sold on the short-term market or spot market at the Settlement Price for the Differences (“PLD” in its Portuguese acronym) and there is also a special mechanism between generators that seeks to re-allocate hydrological risk by offsetting differences between generators’ assured energy and that which is actually produced, called the Electricity Reallocation Mechanism (“MRE” in its Portuguese acronym).

The Brazilian constitution was amended in 1995 to authorize foreign investment in power generation. Before, all generation concessions were held either by Brazilian individuals or entities controlled by Brazilian individuals or the Brazilian government.

The transmission sector operates under monopoly conditions. Revenues from the transmission companies are fixed by the Brazilian government. This applies to all electricity companies with transmission operations in Brazil. The transmission revenue fee is fixed and, therefore, transmission revenues do not depend on the amount of electricity transmitted.

Distribution is a public service that works under monopoly conditions and is provided by companies who have also been granted concessions. Distributors in the Brazilian NIS are not permitted to: (i) develop activities related to the generation or transmission of electricity; (ii) sell electricity to unregulated customers, except for those in their concession area and under the same conditions and tariffs maintained with respect to captive customers in the Regulated Market; (iii) hold, directly or indirectly, any interest in any other company, corporation or partnership; or (iv) develop activities that are unrelated to their respective concessions, except for those permitted by law or in the relevant concession agreement. Similarly, generators are not allowed to hold equity interests in excess of 10.0% in distributors.

The selling of electricity is governed by Law 10,848/ 2004 and Decrees 5,163/2004 and 5,177/2004 of the Electricity Trading Chamber or Clearing House (“CCEE” in its Portuguese acronym), and ANEEL Resolution 109/2004, which introduced the Electricity Trading Convention. This is a convention in which the terms, rules and procedures of the trading in the CCEE are defined. Two possible situations were introduced by these regulations for the execution of energy sales agreements: (i) the regulated contracting environment, in which energy generation and distribution agents participate, and (ii) the free market contracting environment, in which energy generation, trading, importing and exporting agents, and unregulated customers, participate.

81

Commercial relations between the agents participating in the CCEE are governed mainly by energy sales agreements. All the agreements between the agents in the Brazilian NIS should be registered with the CCEE. The register includes the amounts of energy and the terms. The energy prices agreed are not registered with the CCEE, but instead are specified by the parties involved in the agreements.

The CCEE books the differences between energy produced or consumed and the contracted amount. The positive or negative differences are settled in the short-term market and priced at the PLD, determined weekly for each level of load and for each sub-market, based on the system’s marginal operating cost, within a minimum and maximum price range.

The unregulated market includes the sale of electricity between generation concessionaires, independent producers, self-producers, sellers of electricity, importers of electricity, unregulated, and special customers. It also includes contracts in place between generators and distributors until their expiration, at which point new contracts may be entered into under the terms of the new regulatory framework. According to the specifications set forth in Law 9,427/96, unregulated customers in Brazil are those who currently have: (i) a demand of at least 3,000 kW , generated using any method and purchase the energy supply directly with generators or traders, but not directly from distributors or (ii) a demand in the range of 500 to 3,000 kW generated using NCRE and purchase their energy supply directly with alternative generators or traders, with the option to purchase energy from distributors as well.

The Brazilian NIS is coordinated by the Brazilian Electricity System Operator (“ONS” in its Portuguese acronym) and is divided into four electric sub-systems: South-East/Center-West, South, North-East, and North. In addition to the Brazilian NIS, there are also the isolated systems that are not part of the Brazilian NIS. These isolated systems are generally located in the Northern and North-Eastern regions of Brazil and rely solely on electricity generated from coal-fired and oil-fueled thermal plants. According to the ONS, more than 98% of the energy required by Brazil is supplied by the Brazilian NIS and only 1.7% is supplied by isolated systems.

Principal Regulatory Authorities

The Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy (“Brazilian MME”) regulates the electricity industry and its primary role is to establish the policies, guidelines and regulations for the sector.

The Brazilian National Energy Policy Council (“CNPE” in its Portuguese acronym) is in charge of developing the national electricity policy. Among its roles are to guide the President in the formulation of energy policies and guidelines, promote the stable and secure supply of the country’s energy resources, ensure the energy supply to the most distant places of the country, establish directives for specific programs (such as the use of natural gas, alcohol, biomass, coal and thermonuclear energy), and establish directives for the import and export of energy.

The Energy Research Company (“EPE” in its Portuguese acronym) is an entity under the Brazilian MME. Its purpose is to provide services in the area of studies and research to support the energy sector planning.

ANEEL, the Brazilian National Agency for Electric Energy, is the entity that implements the regulatory policies, and its main responsibilities include, among others: (i) supervision of the concessions for electricity sale, generation, transmission and distribution; (ii) enactment of regulations for the electricity sector; (iii) implementation and regulation of the exploitation of electricity resources, including the use of hydroelectricity; (iv) promotion of a bidding process for new concessions; (v) resolution of administrative disputes between electricity sector agents; and (vi) setting the criteria and methodology for determining distribution and transmission tariffs, as well as the approval of all the electricity tariffs, ensuring that customers pay a fair price for energy supplied and, at the same time, preserving the economic-financial balance of the distribution companies, so that they can provide the service to agreed quality and continuity.

82

The Energy Sector Monitoring Committee (“CMSE” in its Portuguese acronym) is an entity created under the scope of the Brazilian MME and is under the Brazilian MME’s direct coordination. CMSE was established to evaluate the continuity and security of the energy supply across the country. CMSE has the mandate to: (i) follow the development of the energy generation, transmission, distribution, trading, import and export activities; (ii) assess the supply and customer service as well as the security of the system; (iii) identify difficulties and obstacles that affect the supply security and regularity; and (iv) recommend proposals for preventive actions that can help preserve the supply security and service.

CCEE is a non-profit company subject to authorization, inspection and regulation by ANEEL and its main purpose is to carry out the wholesale transactions and trading of electric power within the Brazilian NIS by registering the agreements resulting from market adjustments and whose agents are gathered into four categories: generation, distribution, trading and customers.

The ONS is comprised of generation, transmission and distribution companies, and independent customers, and is responsible for the coordination and control of the generation and transmission operations of the Brazilian NIS, subject to the ANEEL’s regulation and supervision.

The Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (“IBAMA” in its Portuguese acronym) is an executive body of the National Environmental Policy, which takes the form of a federal autarchy. It is part of the Ministry of Environment, with responsibility for the implementation of the National Environmental Policy and the preservation and conservation of natural heritage, exercising control and supervision over the use of natural resources (water, flora, wildlife, soil, etc.).

IBAMA is also responsible for the environmental impact studies and the granting of environmental licenses for projects nationwide. The environmental license is a procedure by which the competent environmental agency at the federal, state or municipal levels, allows the location installation, expansion, and operation of businesses and activities that require natural resources. It also can consider the effective or potential pollution, in whatever form, and any cause of environmental degradation. This license seeks to ensure that preventive and control measures taken in the draft are compatible with sustainable development.

The Electricity Law

General

Before 1993, power tariffs were the same throughout Brazil. The dealers were entitled to a guaranteed return because the regulatory regime provided for the cost of service. Concession areas that obtained a higher return than the one guaranteed deposited the surplus in a fund from which the distributors with less than the guaranteed return withdrew the difference.

In 1993, the Brazilian electric sector was reformed through Law 8,631/93, which abolished the equalization of electricity tariffs system.

The Concessions Law 8,987 and the Power Sector Law 9,074, both enacted in 1995, intended to promote competition and attract private capital into the electricity sector. Since then, several assets owned by the Brazilian government and/or state governments have been privatized.

The Power Sector Law also introduced the concept of independent power producers (“IPPs”) in order to open the electricity sector to private sector investment. IPPs are single agents, or agents acting in a consortium, who receive a concession, permit or authorization from the Brazilian government to produce electricity for sale for their own account.

Law 9,648/98 created the wholesale energy market, composed by the generation and distribution companies. Under this new law, the purchase and sale of electricity are freely negotiated.

The spot price is used to value the purchase and sale of electric power in the short term market. According to the law, the CCEE is responsible for setting electricity prices in the spot market. These prices are calculated on a marginal costs basis, modeling future operation conditions and setting a merit order curve with variable costs for thermal units and opportunity cost for hydroelectric plants, resulting in one price for each subsystem set for the week subsequent to the determination.

83

Pursuant to Law 10,433/02, the wholesale energy market structure came to be closely regulated and monitored by ANEEL. ANEEL is also responsible for setting wholesale energy market governance rules including measures to stimulate permanent external investment.

During 2003 and 2004, the Brazilian government established the basis for a new model for the Brazilian electricity sector through Laws 10,847 and 10,848 of March 15, 2004, and Decree 5,163 of July 30, 2004. The principal objectives of these laws and decrees were to (i) guarantee the security of the electricity supply, (ii) promote the reasonability of tariffs, and (iii) improve social integration in the Brazilian electricity sector through programs designed to provide universal access to electricity.

The new model contemplates a series of measures to be followed by the agents, such as the obligation to contract all the demand of the distributors and unregulated customers. It also defines a new methodology for calculating the physical energy guarantee for sale of generation, contracting hydroelectric and thermal generating plants in proportions that ensure the best balance between guarantee and supply cost, plus the constant monitoring of the continuity and security of supply, seeking to detect occasional imbalances between supply and demand.

In terms of the tariffs’ reasonability, the model contemplates the purchase of electricity by distributors in a regulated environment through tenders in which the principle of lowest tariff is observed. As a result, the cost of acquiring electricity to be passed on to captive customers can be reduced. The new model creates conditions for the benefits of electricity made available to customers who do not yet have this service and for guaranteeing a subsidy for low income customers.

Limits and Restrictions

Regulatory Resolution 299/2008 repeals certain sections of ANEEL Resolution 278/2000, which established the limits and conditions for the participation of electricity distributors and traders. Specifically, the section of Resolution 278/2000 on limits to generation was repealed. Subsequently, Resolution 378/2009 establishes new procedures for analyzing mergers and violations of economic regulations in the electric power sector.

Regulation of Generation Companies

Concessions

The Concessions Law provides that, upon receiving a concession, IPPs, self-producers, suppliers and customers will have access to the distribution and transmission systems owned by other concessionaires, provided that they are reimbursed for their costs as determined by ANEEL.

Companies or consortia that intend to build or operate hydroelectric generation facilities with a capacity exceeding 30 MW or transmission networks in Brazil have to resort to a public tender process. Concessions granted to the holder give the right to generate, transmit or distribute electricity, as the case may be, in a given concession area for a certain period of time.

Concessions are limited to 35 years for new generation concessions and to 30 years for new transmission or distribution concessions. Existing concessions may be renewed at the Brazilian government’s discretion for a period equal to their initial term.

In September 2012, ANEEL’s Provisional Resolution 579 established the criteria for the renewal of generation, transmission and distribution concessions that expire between 2015 and 2017. It foresees the reduction of energy tariffs and indemnities for non-depreciated investments in hydroelectric plants and transmission installations. In addition, Provisional Resolution 577 defines procedures for the temporary provision of the electricity energy service in the case of cancellation of concessions due to management problems. It also reinforces the powers of ANEEL to intervene in the case of economic-financial imbalance in order to avoid affecting the service provided.

84

On January 23, 2013, the Brazilian congress approved Law 12,783, which renewed electricity concessions according to Provisional Resolution 579. This law requires companies to reduce the average electricity tariff by 20.2% from February 2013, and to extend generation, transmission and distribution concessions for up to 30 years, for both hydroelectric and thermal plants, which expire between 2015 and 2017.

Dispatch and Pricing (Settlement Price for the Differences (“PLD”)

The PLD is used to value the purchase and the sale of electric power in the short term market. The price-setting process of the electric power traded in the short-term market is accomplished by using the data employed by the ONS to optimize the operation of the Brazilian NIS.

The mathematical models used to compute the PLD take into account the preponderance of hydro-electric plants within the Brazilian power generation grid. The purpose is to find an optimal equilibrium solution between the current benefit obtained from the use of the water and the future benefit resulting from its storage, measured in terms of the savings from the use of fuels for thermal plants.

The PLD is an amount computed on a weekly basis for each load level based on the Marginal Operational Cost, which in turn is limited by a maximum and minimum price in effect for each period and submarket. The intervals set for the duration of each level are determined by the ONS for each month and reported to the CCEE to be included into the accounting and settlement system.

The model used to compute the PLD seeks to achieve an optimal result for the period being studied and to define both the hydroelectric and thermal power generation for each submarket by taking into account the hydrological conditions, the demand for electric power, the prices of fuel, the cost of the deficit, the entry of new projects into operation and the availability of equipment used for generation and transmission. As result of this process, the Marginal Operational Costs can be obtained for each load level and submarket.

The calculation of the price is based on the “ex-ante” dispatch that is determined based on estimated information existing prior to the actual operation of the system, taking into account the declared availability amounts regarding both the generation and the consumption envisaged for each submarket. The complete process for calculating the PLD involves the use of the computational models NEWAVE and DECOMP. These models are used to calculate the Marginal Operational Cost for each submarket on a monthly and weekly basis.

Electricity Reallocation Mechanism

The Electricity Reallocation Mechanism (“MRE”) provides financial protection against hydrological risks for hydro-generators in order to mitigate the shared hydrological risks that affect generators and assure the optimal use of the hydroelectric resources of the interconnected power system.

The mechanism guarantees that despite of the centralized dispatch all the generators that participate in the MRE will have a participation in the overall hydro generation dispatched in the proportion of its assured energy. The value of the final allocated energy to a generator can be greater or less than its assured energy depending if the overall hydro generation is greater or less than the overall hydro assured energy, respectively. This mechanism permits each generator, before buying energy in the spot market to fulfill its contracts, to purchase cheaper energy at a price that covers the incremental costs of operation and maintenance of hydroelectric plants and the payment of financial use of water compensation. The tariff used for trading energy in the MRE, the Optimum Energy Tariff, was set as R$ 10.54 / MWh for 2014.

As the overall generation is more stable than the individual production, the MRE is a very efficient mechanism to reduce the volatility of the individual production and the hydrological risk. Therefore, the energy contracts are only financial instruments in the Brazilian system and generation is totally disassociated from the energy contracts.

85

Sales between the Agents of the Market

The current model for the electric sector states that the trading of electric power is accomplished in two market environments: the Regulated Contracting Environment (“ACR” in its Portuguese acronym) and the Free-Market Contracting Environment (“ACL” in its Portuguese acronym).

Contracting in the ACR is formalized by means of regulated, bilateral agreements, called Electric Power Trading Agreements within the Regulated Environment (“CCEAR” in its Portuguese acronym) entered into between selling agents (sellers, generators, independent producers or self-producers) and purchasing agents (distributors) who participate in electric power purchase and sale auctions.

In the ACL environment, on the other hand, the negotiation among the generating agents, trading agents, free-market customers, importers and exporters of electric power is accomplished freely, whereby the agreements for the purchase and sale of electric power are entered into through bilateral agreements.

Generation agents, regardless of whether they are public generation concessionaires, IPPs, self-producers or trading agents, are allowed to sell electric power within the two environments. This allows the overall market to remain competitive. All agreements that have been entered into in the ACR or the ACL are registered in the CCEE and they serve as a basis for the accounting posting and the settlement of the differences in the short term market.

Sales by Generation Companies to Unregulated Customers

In the unregulated contracting environment, the conditions for purchasing energy are negotiable between suppliers and their customers. As for the regulated environment, where distribution companies operate, the purchase of energy must be conducted pursuant to a bidding process coordinated by ANEEL. In 2012, the Brazilian MME’s Decree 455 mandated the creation of a prices index and a requirement to register energy contracts ex-ante. According to the internal schedule of the CCEE, the new price index is expected to be published in June 2014. It is expected that this index will be subject to internal tests over a six month period before being officially published in the market.

Sales by Distribution Companies and Regulated Customers

Pursuant to market regulations, 100% of the energy demand from distributors must be satisfied through long-term contracts. Contracts must be renewed or newly entered into prior to the expiration of current contracts.

Tenders under the current regulatory environment are as follows: (i) A-5 tenders, corresponding to tenders for energy purchases from new generation sources to be supplied five years following the tender; (ii) A-3 tenders, for the acquisition of energy from new generation sources; (iii) A-1 tenders, for the acquisition of energy from existing generation sources; and (iv) A-0 tenders, energy adjustment tenders, for supplementing the energy load necessary for servicing customers in the distribution concession market, with a limit of 1% of such load. Reserve tenders are also carried out for increasing the security of the system.

Various energy tenders were held during 2011, including an A-3 tender and a reserve tender completed in August and an A-5 tender in December.

In the A-3 tender process for the supply of 2014, 2,744.6 MW of new capacity was assigned and is to be generated by 51 plants. Of the total contracted, 62% was from renewable sources (hydroelectric, wind and biomass) and the remaining 38% from fossil fuels (natural gas).

The tender for reserve energy in August 2011 assigned 1,218.1 MW. These were from wind farm, thermal and biomass projects, involving a total of 41 generating plants. The average price was R$ 99.61 per MWh.

For the new A-5 tender process carried out in December 2011, 42 projects were assigned with a capacity of 1,211.5 MW at an average price of R$ 102.18 per MWh.

86

For 2012, two tenders were planned. An A-3 tender for December 12, 2012 was cancelled due to the low demand of distributors. An A-5 tender for new energy was held on December 14, 2012. Of the 574.3 MW of total installed capacity up for tender, 303.5 MW was allocated. The weighted average price was fixed in R$ 91.25 per MWh. Of the total energy allocated, 294.2 MW was allocated to two hydroelectric plants (at an average price of R$ 93.46 per MWh) and 281.9 MW was allocated to ten wind farms (at an average price of R$ 87.94 per MWh) .

In 2013, six tenders took place: (i) an energy adjustments tender, in which no energy was allocated and the maximum price was fixed at R$ 163 / MWh; (ii) an A-0 tender in which no energy was allocated and the maximum price was fixed at R$ 177.22 / MWh; (iii) an A-1 tender in which only 39% of the distributors requirements was allocated at average price of R$ 177.22 / MWh; (iv) an A-3 tender with 332.5 MWh allocated to 39 wind power plants at average price of R$ 124.43 / MWh; (v) an A-5.1 tender in which 690.8 MWh was allocated (46% hydroelectric plants and 54% of biomass thermal plants) at an average price of R$ 124.97 / MWh; and (vi) an A-5.2 tender in which 1,599.5 MWh (33% of hydroelectric plants, 5% of biomass thermal plants and 62% of wind power plants) was allocated at an average price of R$ 109.93 MWh.

For 2014, an A-3 tender has been scheduled for June 6, 2014. Three energy adjustment tenders, at least one A-1 tender and one A-5 tender are expected to be held as well.

Sales of Capacity to Other Generation Companies

Generators can sell their energy to other generators through direct negotiation at freely-agreed prices and conditions.

Incentives and Penalties

Another change imposed on the electricity sector is the separation of the bidding process for “existing power” and “new power” projects. The Brazilian government believes that a “new power project” needs more favorable contractual conditions such as long term power purchase agreements (15 years for thermal and 30 years for hydro) and certain price levels for each technology in order to promote investment for the required expansion. On the other hand, “existing power”, which includes depreciated power plants, can sell their energy at lower prices under contracts with shorter terms.

Law 10,438/02 created certain incentive programs for the use of alternative sources in the generation of electricity, known under the name of Proinfa. It assures the purchase of the electricity generated by Eletrobras for a period of 20 years and financial support from the Brazilian National Development Bank (“BNDES” in its Portuguese acronym), a state-owned development bank. Other programs include a discount of up to 50% on the distribution or transmission tariffs and a special exception for the customers with electricity demand in the range of 500 to 3,000 kW who decide to migrate to an unregulated environment, provided that such customers purchase electricity from generating companies using non-conventional sources of electricity.

Selling agents are responsible for paying the buying agent if they are unable to satisfy their delivery obligations. ANEEL regulations set forth the fines applicable to electricity agents based on the nature and the materiality of the violation (including warnings, fines, temporary suspension of the right to participate in bids for new concessions, licenses or authorizations and forfeiture). For each violation, fines may be imposed for up to 2% of the concessionaire’s revenues arising from the sale of electricity and services provided (net of taxes) in the 12-month period immediately preceding any assessment notice.

ANEEL may also impose restrictions on the terms and conditions of agreements between related parties and, under extreme circumstances, terminate such agreements.

Decree 5,163/2004 establishes that the selling agents must assure 100% physical coverage for their energy and power contracts. This coverage must be made up of physical guarantees from its own power plants or through the purchase of energy or power contracts from third parties.

87

Among other aspects, ANEEL’s Normative Resolution 109/2004 specifies that when these limits are not met, the generation companies and traders are subject to financial penalties. The determination of penalties is predicated on a 12-month period and the revenues obtained from the levying of the penalties are reverted to tariff modality within the ACR.

If the limits on contracting and physical coverage defined in the Trading Rules are not met, the relevant generation companies and traders are notified by the Superintendent of CCEE. Pursuant to the specific Trading Procedure, CCEE’s agents are allowed to file an appeal to be evaluated by CCEE’s Board of Directors who then decides whether to collect or to cancel the financial penalty.

Generation agents may sell power through contracts signed within the ACR or the ACL. Public Service Generators and IPPs must provide a physical coverage from their own power generation for 100% of their sales contracts. Self-producers generate energy for their own exclusive use and they may sell excess power through contracts with ANEEL’s authorization. In both cases, the verification of physical coverage is accomplished on a monthly basis, predicated on generation data and on sales contracts for the last 12 months. Generation agents must pay penalties if they fail to provide physical coverage.

Regulation of Distribution Companies

Energy Purchases

In the regulated market, electricity distribution companies buy electricity through bids that are regulated by ANEEL and organized by CCEE. Distributors must buy electricity at public bids.

There are three types of regulated bids: new energy bids, existing energy bids, and adjustment bids. The government also has the right to call special bids for renewable electricity (biomass, mini-hydro, solar and wind power). ANEEL and CCEE hold the bids annually. The contracting system is multilateral, with generating companies entering into contracts with all distributors who call for bids.

Distribution Tariffs to Final Customers

Distribution tariff rates to final customers are subject to review by ANEEL, which has the authority to adjust and review these tariffs in response to changes in energy purchase costs and market conditions.

Distribution Tariff-Setting Process

When adjusting distribution tariffs, ANEEL divides the Annual Reference Value, the costs of distribution companies, into: (i) costs that are beyond the control of the distributor (“Parcel A costs”), and (ii) costs that are under control of distributors (“Parcel B costs”), the Value-Added Distribution. Each distribution company’s concession agreement provides for an annual adjustment.

The Concessions Law establishes three kinds of reviews for final customer tariffs: annual tariff resetting, and both ordinary and extraordinary tariff reviews.

Distribution companies’ pricing is intended to maintain constant operating margins for the concessionaire by allowing for tariff gains due to Parcel A costs and by permitting the concessionaire to retain any efficiency gains achieved for defined periods of time. Tariffs to end customers are also adjusted according to the variation of costs incurred in purchasing electricity.

Ordinary tariff reviews take into account the entire tariff-setting structure for the company, including the costs of providing services and purchasing energy, as well as a return for the investor. The tariff review period is defined by distributors at the time of signing their respective concession agreement. Therefore, in Brazil, some distributors have a period of three years, most have four year periods and some have five year periods. This means the tariff review applies to all distributors, but with different time periods.

88

Under the previous methodology, the asset base for calculating an allowed return for the investor is the market replacement value depreciated during its accounting useful life, and the rate of return allowed for those assets is based on the weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”), for a “model company”. The operating and maintenance costs reflected in the tariff are calculated based on the model company, which considers the special characteristics of each distribution concession area.

In November 2011, ANEEL approved a new methodology relating to the rules for the third cycle of periodic tariff revisions for electricity tariffs, effective from 2011 to 2014. There were significant changes with respect to the previous methodology:

• For operating costs, the model company is no longer used. The values defined in the previous cycle are adjusted by the variation in the number of customers, consumption and networks, discounting the productivity gains achieved by the distributors;

• The WACC rate of return was reduced to reflect the lower risk of investing;

• The sharing of other revenues with the customer was expanded;

• A new methodology to estimate the distribution of productivity gains and to maintain the economic and financial balance over the tariff cycle was adopted; and

• A new incentive mechanism for improving the quality of service was introduced.

The law guarantees an economic and financial equilibrium for a company in the event that there is a substantial change in its operating costs. In the event that the Parcel A cost components, such as energy purchases and taxes, increases significantly within the period between two annual tariff adjustments, the concessionaire may request that ANEEL pass those costs through to the final customers.

Governmental Tariff Reduction Plan (Provisional Resolution 579/2012)

On September 12, 2012, the Brazilian government’s Provisional Resolution 579/2012 (“MP 579”) reduces tariffs for final customers and defines new concession renewal policies for generation and transmission companies.

In order to reduce the tariff, the Brazilian government proposed to eliminate two sector charges, the Global Reversal Reserve, which are funds to promote expansion in the electricity sector and to indemnify concessions, and the Fuel Consumption Bill, which is a subsidy to thermal generation companies mainly in the northern region. It also reduced the Energetic Development Account (“CDE”) by 75%. The CDE provides energy development from alternative sources, promotes energy service globalization, and subsidizes the low income residential sub-class. These charges will be covered directly with funds from the Brazilian government.

In addition, this resolution provides new concession renewal policies for generation and transmission companies, with concession contracts expiring before 2017 (20% of the generation companies). Although existing laws provided for the possibility of renewing such concessions, there was no clear guidance on the terms of the renewed concessions. With the new policy, energy purchases charges will be reduced due to the non-recognition of assets already amortized, and therefore if the concession-holders choose to renew under such terms, then they would only be able to recover costs related to operation and maintenance. Affected companies represent 23 GW of hydropower capacity and 85,000 kilometers of transmission lines. Approximately 65% of the affected generation companies and all of the affected transmission companies agreed with the new rules.

Legislation containing Provisional Resolution 579/2012 was approved by the Brazilian House of Representatives and was sent for signature of the President of Brazil, by the Law 12.783/2013. The tariff reduction plan aimed at reducing tariffs to final customers by 20%, was passed on January 24, 2013 after an extraordinary tariff review of all of distribution companies.

89

At the beginning of 2013, distributors had an imbalance between regulated demand and energy suppliers. Thus, they were involuntary forced to buy the required energy to serve their regulated customers at the spot market. Due to this imbalance, on March 8, 2013, Presidential Decree 7.945/2013 authorized the pass-through of federal resources to distributors in order for them to pay part of the extra energy costs to which they had been involuntary exposed. The extra energy costs not paid by federal resources will be covered via regulated tariffs in 2014 and 2015 as set forth by regulation of ANEEL, as adjusted by the SELIC interest rate.

In 2014, Decree 8,203 authorized the use of theConta de Desenvolvimento Energy (CDE) to cover part of the additional costs of distribution companies by involuntary exposure to the spot market. Thus, the decree allows the Treasury to anticipate CDE resources.

Regulation in Transmission

Transmission lines in Brazil are usually very long, since most hydroelectric plants are usually located away from the large centers of power consumption. Today, the country’s system is almost entirely interconnected. Only the states of Amazonas, Roraima, Acre, Amapá, Rondônia and a part of Pará are still not connected to the interconnected power system. In these states, supply is carried out by small thermal plants or hydroelectric plants located close to their respective capital cities, but the Brazilian government is gradually connecting these areas.

The interconnected power system provides for the exchange of power among the different regions when any region faces problems such as a reduction in hydroelectric power generation due to a drop in its reservoir levels. As the rainy seasons are different in the south, southeast, north and northeast of Brazil, the higher voltage transmission lines (500 kV or 750 kV) make it possible for locations with insufficient power production to be supplied by generation centers located in a more favorable location.

Any electric power market agent that produces or consumes power is entitled to use the basic network. Free-market customers also have this right, provided that they comply with certain technical and legal requirements. This is called “free access” and is guaranteed by law and by ANEEL.

The operation and management of the basic network is the responsibility of ONS, which is also responsible for managing energy dispatched from plants in optimized conditions, involving use of the interconnected power system hydroelectric reservoirs and thermal plants’ fuel.

Environmental Regulation

The Brazilian constitution gives the federal, state and local governments power to enact laws designed to protect the environment, and to issue regulations under such laws. While the Brazilian government is empowered to enact environmental regulations, the state governments are usually more stringent. Most of the environmental regulations in Brazil are at the state and local level rather than at the federal level.

Hydroelectric facilities are required to obtain concessions for water rights and environmental approvals. Thermal electricity generation, transmission and distribution companies are required to obtain environmental approvals from environmental regulatory authorities.

Colombia

Industry Overview

Industry Structure

The Wholesale Electricity Market in Colombia ( “Colombian MEM” in its Spanish acronym) is based on a competitive market model and operates under open access principles. The Colombian government participates in this market through an institutional structure that is responsible for setting forth policies and regulations, as well as for exercising supervision and control powers in respect of market participants. The Colombian MEM relies for its effective operation on a central agency known as the Colombian Administrator of the Commercial Exchange System (“ASIC” in its Spanish acronym).

90

The Colombian National Interconnected Electric System (“Colombian NIS”) includes generation plants, the interconnection grid, regional transmission lines, distribution lines and end-customers.

There are two categories of agents, generators and traders, who are allowed to buy and sell electricity as well as related products in the Colombian MEM. All of the electricity supply offered by generation companies connected to the Colombian NIS and all of the electricity requirements of end-customers, whose demand is represented by trading companies, are traded on the Colombian MEM.

The following chart shows the relationships among the various participants in the Colombian MEM:

Generation activity consists of the production of electricity through hydroelectric, thermoelectric and all other generation plants connected to the Colombian NIS. The generation sector is organized on a competitive basis, with independent generators selling their output on the spot market or through private contracts with large customers, other generators and traders. Generation companies are required to participate in the Colombian MEM with all of their generation plants or units connected to the Colombian NIS with generating capacities equivalent to or exceeding 20 MW. Generation companies declare their energy availability and the price at which they are willing to sell it. This electricity is centrally dispatched by the National Dispatch Center (“CND” in its Spanish acronym).

Trading consists of intermediation between the market participants that provide electricity generation, transmission and distribution services and the customers of these services, whether or not that activity is carried out together with other electricity-sector activities.

Electricity transactions in the Colombian MEM are carried out under the three following modes:

1. Energy spot market: short term daily market

2. Bilateral contracts: long term market; and

3. “Firm Energy”.

“Firm Energy” refers to the maximum electric energy that a generation plant is able to deliver on a continual basis during a year, in extreme conditions of hydro inflows. The generator who acquires a Firm Energy Commitment (“OEF” in its Spanish acronym) will receive a fixed remuneration during the commitment period, which is explained in the “Incentives and Penalties” section below.

91

Transmission works under monopoly conditions and with a guaranteed annual fixed income that is determined by the new replacement value of the networks and equipment and by the resulting value of bidding processes awarding new projects for the expansion of the National Transmission System (“NTS”). This value is allocated among the traders of the NTS in proportion to their energy demand.

Distribution is defined as the operation of local networks below 220 kV. Any customer may have access to a distribution network for which it pays a connection charge.

There is one interconnected system, the Colombian NIS, and several isolated regional and smaller systems that provide electricity to specific areas. According to the World Energy Council 93.6% of the Colombian population in 2012 received electricity through the public network.

Principal Regulatory Authorities

The Colombian Ministry of Mines and Energy (“Colombian MME”) is responsible for the policy-making of the electricity sector, which aims for a better use of the mining and energy resources available in Colombia, and in turn contributes to the country’s social and economic development.

The Colombian Mining and Energy Planning Agency (“UPME” in its Spanish acronym) is in charge of planning the expansion of the generation and transmission networks.

The National Council for Economic and Social Policy (“CONPES” in its Spanish acronym) is the highest national planning authority and works as an advisory entity to the government in all aspects related to Colombia’s economic and social development. It coordinates and directs the entities responsible for economic and social direction, through the study and approval of documents on policy development.

The National Planning Department (“DNP” in its Spanish acronym) performs the functions of Executive Secretariat of the CONPES and is therefore the entity responsible for coordinating and presenting the documents for discussion at meetings.

The Energy and Gas Regulatory Commission (“CREG” in its Spanish acronym) implements the principles of the industry set out by the Colombian Electricity Act. This commission is constituted by five experts named by the Colombian President, the Colombian MME, the Colombian Ministry of Public Credit and the director of the DNP or their delegates. Such principles are: efficiency (the correct allocation and use of resources and the supply of electricity at minimum cost); quality (compliance with technical requirements); continuity (continuous electricity supply without unjustified interruptions); adaptability (the incorporation of modern technology and administrative systems to promote quality and efficiency); neutrality (impartial treatment of all electricity customers); solidarity (the provision of funds by high-income customers to subsidize the subsistence consumption of low-income customers); and fairness (an adequate and nondiscriminatory supply of electricity to all regions and sectors of the country).

CREG is empowered to issue regulations that govern technical and commercial operations and to set charges for regulated activities. CREG’s main functions are to establish conditions for gradual deregulation of the electricity sector toward an open and competitive market, approve charges for transmission and distribution networks and for regulated customers, establish the methodology for calculating maximum tariffs for supplying the regulated market, regulations for planning and coordination of operations of the Colombian NIS, technical requirements for quality, reliability and security of supply, and protection of customers’ rights.

The National Operation Council (“CNO” in its Spanish acronym) is responsible for establishing technical standards to facilitate the efficient integration and operation of the Colombian NIS. It is a consultative entity composed of the CND’s Director and generation, transmission and distribution company representatives.

The Commercialization Advisory Committee (“CAC”) is an advisory entity which assists CREG with the commercial aspects of the Colombian MEM.

92

The Superintendency of Industry and Commerce investigates, corrects and sanctions restrictive commercial competition practices, such as antitrust behavior. It also oversees mergers of companies operating in the same productive activities to prevent excessive concentration or monopoly of certain industries.

The Superintendency of Domestic Public Services (“SSPD” in its Spanish acronym) is responsible for overseeing all public utility services companies. The SSPD monitors the efficiency of all utility companies and the quality of services. The SSPD can also assume control over utility companies when the availability of utility services or the viability of such companies is at risk. Other duties include (i) enforcing regulations, imposing penalties and generally overseeing the financial and administrative performance of public utility companies, (ii) providing accounting norms and rules for public service companies, and (iii) in general, organizing information networks and databases pertaining to public utilities.

The Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development is responsible for the management of the environment and renewable natural resources. It is also responsible for guiding and regulating environmental planning as well as developing policies and regulations. The Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development’s goal is to recover, conserve, protect, and promote sustainable use of renewable natural resources, the environment of the nation, and to ensure sustainable development, without prejudice to the functions assigned to other sectors.

The Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development, together with the Colombian President, aims to develop national environmental and renewable natural resource policies to ensure the right of Colombians to a healthy environment in which natural heritage and national sovereignty are protected.

The Electricity Law

General

In 1994, the Colombian congress passed significant reforms affecting the public utilities industry. These reforms, contained in Law 142, known as the Public Utility Services Law (“LSPD” in its Spanish acronym), and Law 143, were the result of constitutional amendments made in 1991. These laws form the basic legal framework that currently governs the electricity sector in Colombia. The most significant reforms included the opening of the electricity industry to private sector participation, the functional segregation of the electricity sector into four distinct activities (generation, transmission, distribution and trading), the creation of an open and competitive wholesale electricity market, the regulation of transmission and distribution activities as regulated monopolies and the adoption of universal access principles applicable to transmission and distribution networks.

The Colombian Electricity Act regulates electricity generation, trading, transmission, and distribution (collectively, the “Activities”). Under the law, any company existing before 1994, domestic or foreign, may undertake any of the Activities. Companies established subsequent to such date can engage exclusively in only one of such Activities. Trading, however, can be combined with either generation or distribution.

Limits and Restrictions

The market share for generators and traders is limited. The limit for generators is 25% of the Colombian system’s Firm Energy. The principal market share metric used by CREG to regulate the generation market is the percentage of Firm Energy that a market participant holds.

Additionally, if an electricity generation company’s share of Colombia’s total Firm Energy ranges from 25% to 30% and the market’s Herfindahl Hirschman Index (“IHH” in its Spanish acronym), a measure of market concentration, is at least 1,800, such company becomes subject to monitoring by the SSPD. If an electricity generation company’s share of Colombia’s total Firm Energy exceeds 30%, such company may be required to sell its share exceeding the 25% threshold.

Similarly, a trader may not account for more than 25% of the trading activity in the Colombian NIS. Limitations for traders take into account international energy sales. Market share is calculated on a monthly basis according to the trader’s commercial demand and traders have up to six months to reduce their market share when the limit is exceeded.

93

Such limits are applied to economic groups, including companies that are controlled by, or under common control with, other companies. In addition, generators may not own more than a 25% interest in a distributor, and vice versa. However, this limitation only applies to individual companies and does not preclude cross-ownership by companies within the same corporate group.

A distribution company can have more than 25% of an integrated company’s equity if the market share of the latter company is less than 2% of the national generation business. A company created before the enactment of Law 143 is prohibited from merging with another company created after Law 143 came into effect.

A generator, distributor, trader or an integrated company (i.e., a firm combining generation, transmission and distribution activities) cannot own more than 15% of the equity in a transmission company if the latter represents more than 2% of the national transmission business in terms of revenues.

Regulation of Generation Companies

Concessions

The Colombian electricity sector was structurally reformed by Laws 142 and 143 of 1994. Under this new legal structure, economic activities related to the provision of the electricity service are governed by the constitutional principles of free market economic activity, free market private initiative, freedom to enter and leave, corporate freedom, free market competition and private property, with regulation and inspection, surveillance and control by the state.

According to Law 143 of 1994, these constitutional principles of freedom are the general rule in the electricity sector business, while the concession is the exception. Different economic, public, private or mixed agents may participate in the sector’s activities, which agents shall enjoy the freedom to develop their functions in a context of free market competition. In order to operate or start up projects, they must obtain from the competent authorities the necessary environmental, sanitation and water-right permits as well as other municipal permits and licenses. All economic agents may construct generation plants and their respective connection lines to the interconnection and transmission networks.

The Colombian government cannot legally participate in the execution and exploitation of generation projects. As a general rule, such projects are to be carried out by the private sector. The Colombian government is only authorized to enter into concession agreements on its own behalf relating to generation when there is no entity prepared to assume these activities on comparable conditions.

Dispatch and Pricing

The purchase and sale of electricity can take place between generators, distributors acting in their capacity as traders, traders (who do not generate or distribute electricity) and unregulated customers. There are no restrictions for new entrants into the market as long as the participants comply with the applicable laws and regulations.

The Colombian MEM facilitates the sale of excess energy that has not been committed under contracts. In the wholesale market, an hourly spot price for all dispatched units is established based on the offer price of the highest priced energy dispatched unit for that period. The CND receives price bids each day from all the generators participating in the Colombian MEM. These bids indicate prices and the hourly available capacity for the following day. Based on this information, the CND, guided by an “optimal dispatch” principle (which assumes an infinite transmission capacity through the network), ranks the dispatch optimized during the 24-hour period, taking into account initial operating conditions, and determining which generators will be dispatched the following day in order to satisfy expected demand. The price for all generators is set as the most expensive generator dispatched in each hourly period under the optimal dispatch. This price-ranking system is intended to ensure that national demand, increased by the total amount of energy exported to other countries, will be satisfied at the lowest cost combination of available generating units in the country.

94

Additionally, the CND plans for the dispatch, which takes into account the limitations of the network, as well as other conditions necessary to satisfy the energy demand expected for the following day in a safe, reliable and cost-efficient manner. The cost differences between the “planned dispatch” and the “optimal dispatch” are called “restriction costs”. The net value of such restriction costs is assigned proportionally to all the traders within the Colombian NIS, according to their energy demand, and these costs are passed through to the end customers. Some generators have initiated legal proceedings against the government arguing that recognized prices do not fully cover the costs associated with these restrictions on the grounds that current regulations do not take into account all the costs incurred under safely reliable generation. However, from CREG’s point of view, Resolution 036-2010 modified the remuneration of these restrictions for hydro plants by assigning the opportunity cost to the spot price.

In July 2012 and October 2013, CREG published Resolutions 076-2012 and 082-2013, respectively (“Statute for situations of scarcity in the MEM as part of the operative regulations”) that proposed a draft resolution for defining the rules of operation under critical supply conditions.

Sales by Generation Companies to Unregulated Customers

In the unregulated market, generation companies and unregulated customers sign contracts in which terms and prices are freely agreed. Typically, these agreements establish that the customer pays the energy that it consumes each month without a cap or a floor. The prices are fixed in Colombian pesos indexed monthly to the Colombian PPI. According to resolution CREG 131 of 1998, to be considered “unregulated”, customers are required to have an average monthly power demand for six months of at least 0.1 MW, or a minimum of 55 MWh in monthly average energy demand over the prior six months.

Sales by Distribution Companies to Regulated Customers

The regulated market is served by traders and by distributors acting as traders, who bill all service costs, according to prices regulated by CREG. The scheme allows distributors to pass through the average purchase price of all the market transactions that affect the regulated market into the customer’s tariff, thereby mitigating spot price volatility and providing an efficiency signal to the market. Additionally, CREG established a formula for the total cost of service, which transfers transmission, distribution, marketing costs, and physical losses costs to the regulated market.

Sales by Generation Companies to Traders for the Regulated Market

Traders in the regulated market are required to buy energy through procedures that ensure free market competition. For evaluating the bids, the buyer takes into account price factors as well as other technical conditions and commercial objectives to be defined before the contracting process. These agreements can be signed with different terms, such as: “Pay amount contracted”, “Pay amount demanded with or without a limit”, “Pay the percentage actually consumed”, etc. Prices are denominated in Colombian pesos indexed monthly to the Colombian CPI.

Sales to Other Generation Companies

Generators can sell their energy to other generators through direct negotiation, at freely negotiated prices and conditions.

Regulatory Charges

Contribution by generation per Law 99 of 1993: Generation companies are obliged to pay monthly payments based on their generation to the regional autonomous corporations for environmental protection in areas where the plants are located and to the municipalities where the generation plants are situated. For more information, see “— Environmental Regulation” below.

95

Generation contribution to the Financial Support Fund for Energy for Unconnected Zones (“FAZNI” in its Spanish acronym): Law 633 of 2000 (tax reform) states that generators must make a contribution of 1 Colombian peso to the FAZNI for every kilowatt dispatched on the Wholesale Energy Exchange. Initially, this requirement was effective until December 31, 2007 but it was extended to 2014 by Law 2,099 of November 2006.

Incentives and Penalties

Generators connected to the Colombian NIS can also receive “reliability payments” which are a result of the OEF that they provide to the system. The OEF is a commitment on the part of generation companies backed by its physical resource capable of producing firm energy during scarcity periods. A generator that acquires an OEF will receive fixed compensation during the commitment period, whether or not the fulfillment of its obligation is required. To receive reliability payments, generators have to participate in firm energy bids by declaring and certifying such firm energy. Until November 2012, the transition period, the firm energy supply for reliability purposes was assigned proportionally to the declared firm energy of each generator. Beyond the transition period, the additional firm energy required by the system is allocated by bids.

During 2011, CREG published resolutions for the assignment of OEF for the periods from December 2014 to November 2015 and from December 2015 to November 2016. For the first of these periods, the OEF assigned this pro rata to the existing generators while, for the second, it carried out a second tender for the electricity sector on December 27, 2011.

During 2013, Resolution 062-2013 created incentives for thermal plants to back up their OEF with imported natural gas to guarantee their OEF for 10 years beginning December 2015. The new resolution proposes the foundations of the remuneration for the group of thermal plants in order to develop the first regasification terminal in Colombia. The project will be constructed by an “Infrastructure Agent” that will be chosen through a tender process in 2014.

On March 10, 2014, CREG published Resolution 022/ 2014, which defined a transitory regulated revenue in order to motivate the agents to build the regasification terminal.

The tender for firm energy for the period from November 2015 to December 2016 was made on December 27, 2011. Seven companies participated with a total of eight projects of which five were assigned at a price of US$ 15.7 per MWh. The new projects are Río Ambeima (hydro, 45 MW), Carlos Lleras Restrepo (hydro, 78 MW), San Miguel (hydro, 42 MW), Gecelca 32 (thermal, 250 MW) and Tasajero 2 (thermal, 160 MW). The new assignments were made for a period of twenty years as of December 1, 2015.

In addition, on January 26, 2012, the auction was concluded for projects with long construction periods (“GPPS” in its Spanish acronym) which assigned OEFs for a period of twenty years to three hydroelectric projects and one thermal project. Two of these were assigned to new plants: Termonorte which will have a capacity of 88 MW by 2017 and the Porvenir II hydroelectric power plant which will have a capacity of 352 MW by 2018. The other two involved increases in OEF for plants already under construction and had available firm energy following the GPPS process carried out in 2008 (Sogamoso and Pescadero-Ituango hydroelectric plants). The process ended with assignment prices below the maximum defined for the auction in December (US$ 15.70 per MWh), and were in connection with Termonorte (US$ 14.90 per MWh); Porvenir II (US$ 11.70 per MWh); Sogamoso and Pescadero-Ituango (US$ 15.70 per MWh).

CREG regulated the reconfiguration auction scheme, under the methodology of reliability charge that allowed agents to change the beginning of the OEF by renouncing the “reliability payments” and paying a premium. The market operator, XM, published the results of the auction sale reconfiguration of OEF and Termocol, Amoya and Gecelca were the participating companies.

During 2012 CREG also issued the statement regarding OEF allocation for the period from December 2016 to November 2017. CREG indicated that (i) a tender for OEF allocation was not necessary due to the conditions of the system and (ii) the assignment schedule will be published once there is greater certainty with regards the dates for execution of the Colombia-Panama interconnection agreement and the processes for importing natural gas. CREG Circular 045 states that this publication will be made after June 30, 2014.

96

Despite the statement, a tender was finalized in July 2012 for the reconfiguration of the OEF for the period from December 2012 to November 2013. The OEF was allocated to Termocol, which owns the Poliobras project (4.5 GWh per day) and to Amoyá, which owns the Isagen project (0.5 GWh per day). Such tenders are called when previously allocated OEFs exceed the projected demand for a certain period. The tender ended with a price margin of US$ 0.60 per MWh, which is over the reliability load price for the period from December 2012 to November 2013.

Electricity Exports and Imports

Decision CAN 536 of 2002, CAN 720 of 2009, and CAN 757 of 2011, signed by the countries that participate in the Andean Nations Community (“CAN” in its Spanish acronym), Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia and Peru, established the general framework for the interconnection of electrical systems that created a coordinated economic dispatch for the countries involved in the interconnections. Under this framework, the interconnection system between Colombia and Ecuador was inaugurated in March 2003. The two countries adopted a transitional regime pursuant to CAN 757, while adopting common standards in order to make such international transactions viable.

In addition to the interconnection with Ecuador Colombia is also interconnected with Venezuela by three links, the most important being the Cuestecitas-Cuatricentenario line. During 2011 and 2012, there were some transfers of energy made from Colombia to Venezuela, due to shortages in Venezuela, over this line under an agreement between the presidents of both nations. The agreement covers estimated transactions of 30 GWh per month, with a demand of 70 MW in periods of low and medium load and of 140 MW in periods of high load. The contract was signed on February 1, 2013 for a term of eleven months and was formalized by a contract between Isagen (Colombia) and Corpoelec (Venezuela).

There is also an energy interconnection project with Venezuela being carried out by the Institute of Planning and Promotion of Energy Solutions for Non-Interconnected Zones (“IPSE” in its Spanish acronym) pursuant to an agreement between Colombia and Venezuela. Under the terms of this agreement, Colombia will sell electricity to Venezuela at a rate that is much cheaper than the costs to produce it. Venezuela is expected to pay for the electricity with fuel rather than cash. This interconnection project is estimated to cost US$ 8 billion and contemplates the construction of a 35.6 kilometer transmission line with a capacity of 34,500 volts in order to supply electricity to the region of San Fernando de Atabapo, Venezuela.

In the first half of 2012, CREG and the National Public Services Authority of Panama (“ASEP” in its Spanish acronym) issued resolutions that provided for enhancing the process for tendering of rights to construct the future interconnection line between Colombia and Panama.

The resolutions also supplement pre-existing resolutions by providing for provisions that allow Panamanian distribution companies to participate in future tenders in Colombia. The most important resolutions issued by Colombia are (i) CREG-002-2012, which attempts to resolve the discrepancies between firm capacity in Panama and the OEF in Colombia; (ii) CREG-004-2012, which outlines the exchanges in conditions of rationing; and (iii) CREG 057-2012, which is an operative agreement between the operators of the systems of Colombia and Panama. Panama has also issued parallel resolutions that enable Colombian companies to participate in tenders in Panama as international interconnection agents.

Emgesa, Isagen, Celsia and its subsidiary EPSA participated in the tender process to obtain line capacity rights in Panama that took place on August 21, 2012. These companies were able to participate in the tender by forming subsidiaries in Panama and complying with all requirements under Panamanian law, including the provisions relating to guarantees.

In June 2012, Interconexión Eléctrica Colombia-Panamá (“ICP”), which is jointly owned by Interconexión Eléctrica de Colombia (“ISA”) and the state-owned Empresa de Transmisión Eléctrica de Panamá (“ETESA”), was entrusted with the construction of an interconnection project and was allowed to join the tender for capacity rights. ICP submitted the base amount that is necessary to participate in the tender and proceeded to obtain

97

prequalifications in July and August 2012. However, the tender process was suspended indefinitely on August 19, 2012. This was primarily due to financial reasons as the Panamanian government, citing budget constraints, refused to provide a firm commitment to contribute capital.

ICP is expected to continue to seek financial support in order to ensure the viability of the project and reduce uncertainties for the participants. With the support from the Interamerican Development Bank, ICP has hired a consultant to carry out a study that will explore alternatives plans that would result in more competitive energy prices and greater business opportunities. The Colombian government is also in conversations with its Panamanian counterpart in order to restart the process.

In November 2012, the Declaration of Santiago was signed by Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia. The main purpose of this declaration was to facilitate regional electricity transaction by harmonizing regulatory frameworks of the member countries.

Gas Market

Natural gas is important for the Colombian electricity sector, as natural gas is a key fuel for generation. The Colombian natural gas market operates under near monopolistic conditions and consists of a primary market, secondary market and short-term market. Supply contracts depend on a balance between supply and demand for the next five years, which is calculated by the regulatory authority every year. Transportation contracts are traded under bilateral negotiation schemes or through auctions.

This regulatory framework is the result of a former proposal that sought to reform the wholesale market for natural gas and ensure that it operates under the principles of transparency and liquidity. This new framework also outlines entities that are eligible to participate in each market, the types of permitted transactions, and the kind of contracts that may be entered into. It even seeks to create standardizedforce majeure provisions for such contracts in order to clarify the responsibilities of the parties. The new rules took effect in August 2013.

Additionally, in June 2013 the regulatory authorities published a new incentive framework so as to enable the possibility for the first regasification facility on the north coast of the country. The principal purpose of this facility will be to serve as a backup source of gas to certain thermal plants in Colombia. In the long term, this facility will be an alternative point of supply for the market.

Regulation of Distribution Companies

Distributors (or network operators) are responsible for planning, investing, operating, and maintaining electricity networks below 220 kV. These include regional transmission systems (“STR” in their Spanish acronym) and local distribution systems (“SDL” in their Spanish acronym). Any customer may access the distribution network by paying a connection fee. Under this scheme, the distributor is a passive agent who does not buy energy and is only responsible for transporting it and controlling the technical energy losses.

Distribution Tariff-Setting Process

CREG regulates distribution prices that allow distribution companies to recover costs, including operating, maintenance and capital costs under efficient operations. Distribution charges are set by CREG for each company based on the replacement cost of the existing distribution assets, the cost of capital, as well as operational and maintenance costs that depend on the voltage level.

The methodology for remunerating the distribution business segment was defined by CREG in 2008. The WACC was set at 13.9% before taxes for assets operating above 57.5 kV and 13.0% before taxes for assets operating under this threshold. CREG also defined a methodology for the calculation of distribution charges by creating an incentive scheme for administrative, operating and maintenance costs, service quality and energy losses. During 2009, after auditing the information reported by the companies, CREG established the distribution charges applicable until October 2013. Accordingly, it is expected that CREG will issue a new distribution charge methodology during 2014 and such charges would be approved in 2015.

98

The distribution charges are defined for four different voltage levels which are applied depending on the customer’s connection point as follows:

Level 1: less than 1 kV;

Level 2: at least 1 kV but less than 30 kV;

Level 3: at least 30 kV but less than 57.5 kV; and

Level 4: at least 57.5 kV but less than 220 kV.

Charges are set for a five-year period and are updated monthly according to the PPI. According to CREG’s agenda, the new distribution methodology will be published in the fourth quarter of 2014.

Incentives and Penalties

In December 2011, CREG defined a coverage mechanism, so traders, who serve as final customers, have to guarantee distributors the payment of the STR and SDL tariffs. CREG established that these kinds of traders must use one of the following instruments, in order to provide security of payment to distributors: bank guarantees, stand-by letters of credit letters (either domestic or international) and monthly prepayments.

At the same time, CREG defined new regulation related to non technical losses. It defined that the companies that face higher losses than those approved in current regulation should design a plan to reduce them. CREG approved a new pattern of losses that will be included in the tariff for companies that face losses at an efficient level, and established that non technical losses above the efficient level must be assumed by both distributors.

The distribution business has tariff incentives contingent on the quality of service. Distributors also have to make compensatory payments to customers when it cannot meet the established continuity criteria. In 2012, CREG established the new quality of service regulation for the STR. Specifically, it defined incentives for energy a distribution company fails to provide and required companies to compensate customers for any service interruptions in the STR.

Also in 2012, CREG defined the power quality regulation. Overall, it established minimum quality standards and designed a mechanism in which customers can present their claims to distribution companies and receive compensation if standards are not accomplished by the company. This mechanism introduces new measurement requirements.

Regulation in Transmission

Transmission companies which operate at no less than 220 kV constitute the National Transmission System (“NTS”). They are required to provide access to third parties on equal conditions and are authorized to collect a tariff for their services. The transmission tariff includes a connection charge that covers the cost of operating the facilities, and a usage charge, which applies only to traders.

CREG guarantees an annual fixed income to transmission companies. Income is determined by the new replacement value of the network and equipment and by the resulting value of bidding processes awarding new projects for the expansion of the NTS. This value is allocated among the traders of the NTS in proportion to their energy demand.

The expansion of the NTS is conducted according to model expansion plans designed by the Mining and Energy Planning Agency (“UPME”, in its Spanish acronym) and pursuant to bidding processes opened to existing and new transmission companies, which are handled by the Colombian MME in accordance with the guidelines set by CREG. The construction, operation and, maintenance of new projects is awarded to the company that offers the lowest present value of future cash flows needed for carrying out the project.

In 2012, CREG established the new quality of service regulation for the NTS. It defined incentives for failure to provide energy and required companies to compensate customers, by reducing their charges, for service interruptions in the NTS.

99

Trading Regulation

The retail market is divided into regulated and unregulated customers. Customers in the unregulated market may freely and directly enter into electricity supply contracts with a generator or a distributor, acting as traders, or from a pure trader. The unregulated customer, which for 2013 represented about 33% of the market, consists of customers with a peak demand in excess of 0.1 MW or a minimum monthly energy consumption of 55 MWh.

Trading involves reselling the electricity purchased in the wholesale market. It may be conducted by generators, distributors or independent agents, which comply with certain requirements. Parties freely agree upon trading prices for unregulated customers.

Trading on behalf of regulated customers is subject to the “regulated freedom regime” under which tariffs are set by each trader using a combination of general cost formulas given by CREG and individual trading costs approved by CREG for each trader. Since CREG approves limits on costs, traders in the regulated market may set lower tariffs for economic reasons. Tariffs include, among other things, energy procurement costs, transmission charges, distribution charges and a trading margin.

The trading tariff formula became effective on February 1, 2008. The main changes to this formula were the establishment of a fixed monthly charge and the introduction of reduction costs of non-technical energy losses in the trading charges. In addition, CREG allows traders in the regulated market to choose tariff options to manage tariff increments.

In May 2009, a company called Derivex was created so as to incorporate an energy derivatives market. In October 2010, Derivex began its operation with the first electricity forward derivative contract.

In December 2011, CREG issued the Retailing Code, which includes specific rules that improve retailers’ relations with other electricity market members. It established new regulations about energy measurement, non-technical losses, the retailers’ connection to the wholesale electricity market, and the retailers’ credit risks, among other considerations.

In October 2013, CREG published a new resolution that defines “technical equity” (equity corresponding to the minimum equity that allows agents to perform operations on the wholesale market, either as sellers or buyers) as a mechanism to rate the technical abilities of companies in order to protect the wholesale market from unstable companies. According to the new rule, any transaction in the spot market has to be lower than the technical equity of the companies involved in the transaction.

In order to improve wholesale price formation, CREG has been designing a new energy procurement scheme based on long term energy bids, known as Organized Market (“MOR” in its Spanish acronym). The final rules for this new system are not available, but CREG issued a new draft version of the mechanism by Resolution 117-2013, and the deadline for consultations has passed. It is expected that CREG will issue the final resolution on MOR in early 2014 and will call for the first auction in mid-2014.

Tariffs to Final Customers

The energy trader is responsible for charging the electricity costs to end customers and to transfer their payments to the industry’s agents. The tariffs applied to regulated customers are calculated pursuant to a formula established by CREG. This formula reflects the costs of the industry: generation, transmission, distribution (depending on the customer’s connection level), trading losses, constraints, administrative costs, and market operating costs.

In addition, the final costs of the service are affected by subsidies and/or contributions that are applied according to the socio-economic level of each customer. When subsidies exceed contributions, the Colombian government covers the difference. The subsidies mechanism is experiencing some modifications. Colombian MME’s Resolution 18 1479 (August 2012) modified the subsidy removal method for residential customers whose consumption exceeds the subsistence consumption, as established in article 2 of Resolution 18 1272 of 2011.

100

Colombian MME’s Decree 011 2012 regulating the Social Energy Fund (“FOES” in its Spanish acronym) as provided in article 103 of Law 1450 of 2011 (published in 2012). The purpose of FOES is to cover up to CPs 46 per kWh of the value of electricity for subsistence consumption of residential customers belonging to income groups 1 and 2 of the least developed rural areas.

Another factor that affects the final tariff is the Distribution Area which established a single tariff for the distribution companies in adjacent geographic zones.

Environmental Regulation

The environmental framework in Colombia was established by Law 99/1993, which also established the Colombian Ministry of the Environment (now the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development) as the authority for determining environmental policies. The Colombian Ministry of Environment defines issues, executes policies and regulations that focus on the recovery, conservation, protection, organization, administration and use of renewable resources.

Any entity planning to develop projects or activities relating to generation, interconnection, transmission or distribution of electricity that may result in environmental deterioration must first obtain environmental permits and licenses and also establish environmental management plans.

According to Law 99, generation plants that have a total installed nominal capacity above 10 MW are required to contribute to the conservation of the environment. Hydroelectric power plants must pay 6% of their generation and thermoelectric plants must pay 4% of their generation in addition to a tariff that is annually determined. This payment is made monthly to the municipalities and environmental corporations where these facilities are located.

Law 1450 of 2011 issued the National Development Plan 2010-2014. The plan establishes that between 2010 and 2014, the government must develop strategies for environmental sustainability and for the prevention of environment risks. These include measures such as the national plan for adaptation to climate change, the environmental licensing process and environmental impact studies.

In 2011, Institutional Decree 3,570 established a new regulatory structure for the environment, creating the Colombian Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development (previously, the functions of the Ministry of the Environment were established in conjunction with functions of the Ministry of Housing). The main objective of the Colombian Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development is the formulation and management of environmental and renewable natural resource policies. In 2012, the Colombian Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development published several resolutions. Resolution 1517 of 2012 established the procedures relating to the Environmental Compensation for Biodiversity Loss while Decree 1640 of 2012 set forth regulations for the planning and management of hydrographic basins. In addition, Resolution 1526 of 2012 established the procedural requirements for the subtraction of the forest areas protected by Law 2 of 1959.

In 2012, the Colombian Ministry of the Environment and Sustainable Development included the NAMA (Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action) in the CDM (Clean Development Mechanism) & NAMA Portfolio.

NAMA and CDM are two mechanisms established by the United Nations in order to promote the developments of project which reduce emissions of greenhouse gases in certain countries (listed in Exhibit I of the Kyoto Protocol), for example, electric vehicles promoted by Endesa Spain and Enersis.

The Colombian Ministry of the Environment and Sustainable Development publishes progress reports annually for the portfolio projects of CDM and NAMA under development in Colombia. This gives interested parties a chance to buy CERs (Certified Emission Reduction) in connection with CDM projects and also provides financing opportunities in the case of NAMA projects.

In December 2012, the UPME published Resolution 0563, which establishes the procedure for the exclusion of sales tax for the programs or activities related to reduced energy consumption and energy efficiency.

101

In August 2013, the DNP issued CONPES Document 3762, a policy text that established guidelines for the identification and priorization of infrastructure projects that are of national and strategic interest in the energy, mining, oil, gas, and transportation sectors. It defines the relevant issues related with the formalities and procedures for acquiring land, prior consultation, community relations, environmental licensing and permits, and institutional coordination, all of which need to be resolved in order to assure the correct formulation and development of those projects.

In the last few years, the environmental regulation for the electricity sector has been focused on regulating power plant emissions, hydro policies (including water discharges and basin organizations), and environmental licensing and penalties.

Peru

Industry Overview

Industry Structure

In the Wholesale Electricity Market (“Peruvian MEM” in its Spanish acronym) there are four categories of local agents: generators, transmitters, distributors and large customers.

The following chart shows the relationships among the various participants in the interconnected system, (“SEIN” in its Spanish acronym)

The generation segment is composed of companies which own generation plants. This segment is noted for being a competitive market in which prices tend to reflect the marginal cost of production.

Electricity generators, as energy producers, have capacity and energy sale commitments with their contracted customers. Generators may sell this capacity and energy to both distributors and unregulated customers.

The energy received by a generator’s unregulated and regulated customers does not necessarily coincide with the energy produced by that supplier since the generation plants’ production is allocated by the Committee of Economic Operation of the System (“COES” in its Spanish acronym), the system operator, through a centralized dispatch. The transfer cost is minimized through a consideration of the variable production costs of each power plant, regardless of their contractual commitments (the only exception to this rule are the natural gas plants, which declare the natural gas price once a year for dispatch purposes). Therefore, there is a short-term market also managed by the COES, where an economic balance is made between the energy produced and the consumption required by the generators’ customers. The only exception to this rule are the natural gas plants which declare (once a year) the natural gas price for dispatch matters.

102

The generation plants’ production and the customers’ energy consumption at the nodal short-term marginal cost are valued, and the deficit generators pay for the energy purchased from surplus generators. The balance made in connection with energy sales is also carried out with respect to capacity, in which case the price of the capacity corresponds to a price regulated by the Supervising Entity on Investment in Energy and Mining (“Osinergmin” in its Spanish acronym), the Peruvian regulatory electricity authority.

In 2008, due to gas transport and electricity transmission problems, Osinergmin defined a new rule to calculate spot prices through December 2013. Decree 049/2008 established two models, one which represented a theoretical dispatch without considering any restrictions and another that considered real dispatch with restrictions. The spot price is obtained from the theoretical dispatch (known as “idealized marginal cost”), and the additional operating costs resulting from system restrictions are paid by demand to the affected generators through a mechanism established by the authority. The “idealized marginal cost” regime was finally extended until December 31, 2016.

The settlements made by the COES also include payments and/or collections for complementary services such as frequency and tension regulation. They also consider compensation for operating cost overruns, such as the operation at minimum load, random operational tests, etc.

Regulation DS 027-2011-EM of June 2011 established that as of January 2014, several participants may also participate as buyers in the short-term market, in addition to the generators. These other participants include distributors (in order to meet the demand of their unregulated customers), large customers with demand over 10 MW, and a group of unregulated customers whose aggregate demand exceeds 10 MW. This regulation is now suspensed until the wholesale market prices return to previous levels (anticipated to occur after 2017).

The transmission system is made up of transmission lines, substations and equipment for the transmission of electricity from the production points (generators) to the consumption centers or distribution points. Transmission in Peru is defined as all lines or substations with a tension higher than 60 kV. Some generation and distribution companies also operate sub-transmission systems at the transmission level.

Electricity distribution is an activity carried out in the concession areas granted to different distribution companies.

Customers with a capacity demand lower than 200 kW are considered regulated customers, and their energy supply is considered to be a public service. Customers whose capacity demand is within the range of 200-2,500 kW are free to choose whether to be considered regulated or unregulated customers. Once this type of customer chooses to be a regulated or unregulated customer, the customer has the obligation to remain in that category for at least three years. If the customer wants to change its category from regulated to unregulated customer, or vice versa, it shall provide at least one year advance notice.

There is only one interconnected system, the SEIN, and several isolated regional and smaller systems that provide electricity to specific areas. According to the National Institute of Statistics of Peru (“INEI” in its Spanish acronym as of December 2012, 91.2% of the population obtained electricity through the public network.

Principal Regulatory Authorities

The Peruvian Ministry of Energy and Mining (“MINEM” in its Spanish acronym) defines energy policies applicable nationwide, regulates environmental matters applicable to the energy sector and oversees the granting, supervision, maturity and termination of licenses, authorizations and concessions for generation, transmission, and distribution activities. On August 10, 2012, Regulation DS 030-2012-EM amended the articles of organization and defined the functions of MINEM and the Natural Gas Management Department .

The Agency for the Promotion of Private Investment (“PROINVERSIÓN” in its Spanish acronym) is a public entity responsible for attracting private investment in public utilities and infrastructure works. It also advises regarding the difficulties faced by investors in making their investments.

103

Osinergmin, the Energy and Mining Investment Supervisor, is an autonomous public regulatory entity that controls and enforces compliance with legal and technical regulations related to electrical and hydrocarbon activities, controls and enforces compliance with the obligations stated in the concession contracts, and is responsible for the preservation of the environment in connection with the development of these activities. Osinergmin’s Tariff Regulatory Bureau has the authority to publish the regulated tariffs. It also controls and supervises the bidding processes required by distribution companies to purchase energy from generators.

The COES coordinates the SEIN’s short, medium- and long-term operations at minimum cost, maintaining the security of the system and optimizing energy resources. It also plans for the SEIN’s transmission development and manages the short-term market.

The National Institute for Defense of Competition and Intellectual Property (“INDECOPI” in its Spanish acronym) is responsible for promoting competition, protecting customer rights and safeguarding all forms of intellectual property.

The General Electricity Authority (“DGE” in its Spanish acronym) is the regulatory technical entity responsible for evaluating the electricity sector, and proposes the necessary regulations for the development of the electricity generation, transmission and distribution activities.

The Peruvian Ministry of Environment (“MINAM” in its Spanish acronym) defines environmental policies applicable nationwide and is the head of the national environmental management system, which includes the National Environmental Impact Assessment System, the National Environmental Information System, the Protected Natural Areas System, as well as the management of natural resources in its area of competence, biodiversity and climate change, among others.

The Electricity Law

General

The general legal framework applicable to the Peruvian electricity industry includes: the Law of Electricity Concessions (Decree Law 25,844/1992) and its ancillary regulations, the Law to Secure the Efficient Development of Electricity Generation (Law 28,832/2006), the Technical Regulation on the Quality of the Electricity Supply (Supreme Decree 020/1997), the Electricity Import and Export Regulation (Supreme Decree 049/2005), the Antitrust Law for the Electricity Sector (Law 26,876/1997), and the law that regulates the activity of Osinergmin (Law 26,734/1996, together with Law 27,699/2002).

Some of the characteristics of the regulatory framework are (i) the separation of the three main activities: generation, transmission and distribution; (ii) freely-determined prices for the supply of energy in competitive market conditions; (iii) a system of regulated prices based on the principle of efficiency together with a bidding regime; and (iv) private operation of the interconnected electricity systems subject to the principles of efficiency and quality of service.

Law 29,852/2012 and Regulation 021-2012-EM created the Hydrocarbons Energy Security System and the Fund of Social Energy Inclusion (“FISE” in its Spanish acronym). These laws also created a system of social compensation and universal service for the most vulnerable sectors of the population which will be financed by surcharges on the electricity billing of unregulated customers (equivalent to the surcharge that exists today for regulated customers on the Electrical Social Compensation Fund (“FOSE” in its Spanish acronym)), transport surcharges for hydrocarbon-derivate liquids and natural gas multi-pipelines and surcharges on the use of the natural-gas pipeline.

Osinergmin and distribution companies will be the administrators of the FISE, which funds will be directed to (i) the massification of natural gas to vulnerable sectors, (ii) develop new energy sources like photovoltaic cells, solar panels, etc., and (iii) supply liquefied petroleum gas (“LPG”) to vulnerable sectors.

104

Law 29,969/2012 provides for the massification of natural gas. State electricity distributors are authorized to carry out natural-gas programs, including the distribution of natural gas in their concession area. They will also be able to associate with companies specializing in the development of gas-distribution projects. Within a maximum term of three years from the start of the gas distribution, MINEM will start the process of promoting private investment for the granting of the gas-distribution concession of gas by the pipeline network.

Law 29,970/2012 guarantees energy security and promotes the development of the petro-chemical complex in the south of the country. Under this law, the following agendas have been declared as a matter of national interest: (i) guaranteeing energy security, (ii) transporting ethane to the south of Peru; and (iii) constructing regional pipelines in the regions of Huancavelica, Junín, and Ayacucho and linking them with the existing gas pipelines.

Limits and Restrictions

Since the enactment of the Law of Electricity Concessions, vertical integration is restricted, and thus activities in the generation, transmission and distribution segments must be developed by different companies. The Antitrust Law for the Electricity Sector regulates the cases in which vertical and horizontal integration is admissible.

An authorization is compulsory for those electricity companies that hold more than 5% of another business segment, either before or as a result of a merger or integration. An authorization is also required for the horizontal integration of generation, transmission and distribution activities which result in a market share of 15% or higher of any business segment, either before or as a result of any operation.

Such authorizations are granted by the Institute for Defense of the Consumer and Intellectual Property, using the market share information provided by Osinergmin.

Regulation of Generation Companies

Concessions

Generation companies that own or operate a power plant with an installed capacity greater than 500 kW require a concession granted by the MINEM. A concession for electricity generation activity is an agreement between the generator and the MINEM, while an authorization is merely a unilateral permit granted by said public entity. Authorizations are granted by the MINEM for an unlimited period of time, although their termination is subject to the same considerations and requirements as the termination of concessions under the procedures set forth in the Law of Electricity Concessions, and its related regulations.

In order to receive a concession, the applicant must first request for a temporary concession of two years, and must subsequently apply for a definitive concession.

In order to receive an authorization, the applicant must file a petition before the MINEM. If the petition is admitted and no opposition is presented, the MINEM grants the authorization to develop generation activities for unlimited time, subject to compliance with applicable regulations.

Dispatch and Pricing

The coordination of electricity dispatch operations, the setting of spot prices and the control and management of economic transactions that take place in the SEIN are controlled by COES. Generators can sell energy directly to large customers and buy the deficit or transfer the surplus between contracted energy and actual production in the pool at the spot price. Resolution 080-2012-OS/CD ( 2012) established the criteria and methodology for deciding the real-time operation under exceptional conditions as declared by the MINEM.

105

Sales by Generation Companies to Unregulated Customers

Sales to unregulated customers are carried out at mutually agreed prices and conditions, which include tolls and compensation for the use of transmission systems and, if necessary, to distribution companies for the use of their network.

Sales to Distribution Companies and Certain Regulated Customers

Sales to distributors can be under bilateral contracts at a price no greater than the regulated price in the case of regulated customers, or at an agreed price in the case of unregulated customers. In addition to the bilateral method allowed under the Law of Electricity Concessions, Law 28,832 has also established the possibility that distributors may meet their unregulated or regulated customers’ demand under contracts signed following a capacity and energy supply tender process.

Sales of Capacity to Other Generation Companies

COES determines a firm capacity for each power plant on an annual basis. Firm capacity is the highest capacity that a generator may supply to the system at certain peak hours, taking into consideration statistical information and accounting for time out of service for maintenance purpose and for extremely dry conditions in the case of hydroelectric plants.

A generation company may be required to purchase or sell capacity in the spot market, depending upon its contractual requirements in relation to the amount of electricity to be dispatched from such company and to its firm capacity.

Regulatory Charges

In addition to taxes applicable to all industries (mainly an income tax and a value added tax), the electricity industry operators are subject to a special regulation contribution that compensates the costs incurred by the state in connection with the regulation, supervision and monitoring of the electricity industry. The applicable rate for this contribution is up to 1% of the annual billing of each company and the funds levied are distributed proportionally to the MINEM and Osinergmin.

Generators that also have hydroelectric plants pay a water royalty as a function of the hydroelectric energy produced and the regulated energy tariff at peak hours.

Tenders Promoted by the State

During 2009, MINEM carried out several studies which concluded that there will be lack of power generation capacity in the system, in the near future. MINEM recommended the construction of new power plants that would serve as backup in order to guarantee the flow of electricity to the system and avoid blackouts. As a result, PROINVERSIÓN carried out a public bid in August 2010, seeking to secure investments for three projects located in Talara, Trujillo and Ilo that will add another 800 MW to the system. The bid resulted in only two of the projects being awarded: Talara (200 MW, for EEPSA, now an Enersis subsidiary) and Ilo (400 MW, for Enersur, an unrelated company). These plants will receive regular payments for being permanently available to operate and provide energy to the SEIN whenever the COES calls on them and will also be reimbursed for the fuel costs incurred for generating electricity. The Trujillo generation facility was later substituted by the Eten generation facility, and awarded to Planta de Reserva Fría de Generación de Eten S.A. (200 MW) (the “Cold Reserve Project”).

An international tender was held in 2012 for the concession for the Cold Reserve Project for the Pucallpa (Ucayali) and Puerto Maldonado (Madre de Dios) plants, which were awarded to Consorcio Energía Perú S.A. The term for the construction of the plants will be 30 months from the signing of the contracts and the concession covers a period of 20 years plus the construction period. The Pucallpa thermal plant will require an investment of around US$ 31.5 million and will have a capacity between 35 and 40 MW, covering 80% of the energy demand. The Puerto Maldonado thermal plant will require an investment of around US$ 18.5 million, will have a capacity between 15 and 18 MW, covering 100% of the energy demand.

106

PROINVERSIÓN established February 28, 2013 as the date to submit offers for the international public tender that is intended to promote private investments for the Hydroelectric Plants project (CH Molloco—310 MW), which is located in the hills of the Arequipa region.

Services provided by generation, transmission, and distribution companies have to comply with technical standards stated in the Technical Regulations on the Quality of the Electric Supply. Failure to do so might result in the imposition of fines by Osinergmin.

Generators receive a capacity payment whose main component is the annuity of a peak-load plant. However, to be eligible to obtain this charge, plants have to be part of the reserve margin established annually by Osinergmin. The capacity ranking is constructed in base of firm power of every power plant connected to the system and their relative efficiency (ordered by variable costs). Only those plants that appear in the ranking as required to cover the peak demand plus the reserve margin obtain capacity payment. Every year, Osinergmin sets the power price that shall be assigned and paid to each generator pursuant to this concept.

Electricity Exports and Imports

A 220 kV transmission line has been implemented for the interconnection with Ecuador, with a limited capacity of 160 MW. However, the line has not operated continuously because of regulatory issues. During June and August 2011, Peru imported energy from Ecuador due to the lack of generation in northern Peru and transmission problems to that zone in the SEIN. In 2012, Peru imported 4.5 GWh of electricity from Ecuador due to the maintenance of the Talara Zorritos line (3.9 GWh in February 2012) and the TGN4 Malacas power plant (0.6 GWh in March 2012). All of the exports to Ecuador totaling 5.5 GWh occurred in August and September 2012 (1.9 GWh and 3.6 GWh, respectively.)

Internal regulations were also approved for the application of Decision 757 of the Andean Community of Nations (“CAN” in its Spanish acronym), which establishes that when bilateral electricity transactions are carried out with other countries of the CAN, the Economic Operation Committee of the SEIN should send to the MINEM and to Osinergmin weekly reports showing that priority has been given to supplying the domestic market (Supreme Decree 011-2012-EM).

In addition to the interconnection with Ecuador, the governments of Peru and Brazil in 2010 signed the “Agreement between the Republic of Peru and the Federal Republic of Brazil for the supply of electricity to Peru and export of surpluses to Brazil” with the main purpose of exploiting Peruvian hydroelectric resources in the Amazon basin. In January 2012, Peru created a commission to handle the aspects contemplated in that agreement. The general framework establishes that the accumulated capacity of the generation plants that can be committed to export to Brazil is a maximum of 7,200 MW and dispatch will have the following order of priority: (i) the Peruvian regulated market, (ii) the Peruvian unregulated market, and lastly, (iii) the Brazilian market. As of the date of this Report, the process is on hold, and is expected to be approved by the Peruvian congress that currently is under the study of the Commission of Andean, Amazonian and Afro-Peruvian Peoples, Environment and Ecology.

The governments of Peru and Chile have established a bilateral working group to discuss energy matters. The purpose of the working group is to identify and take advantage of the potential synergies between the two countries. The first few meetings of this group took place in 2011. At the request of the presidents of both nations, the working group is expected to propose a framework for an agreement in connection with both countries’ electricity integration that would establish the general rules for energy exchanges between them. As of the date of this Report, both countries have conducted negotiations but a final agreement is still pending.

107

Regulation of Distribution Companies

Bids for Supplying Regulated Customers

The Law to Secure the Efficient Development of Electricity Generation established a bidding regime for the acquisition of energy and capacity by distributors through competitive tenders and firm prices. The regulator approves the general conditions and establishes a price cap for the bidding process. In addition, distributors can sign bilateral short term contracts with generators in order to buy power blocks not covered by tenders and to fill any future imbalance.

The new contracts to sell energy to distribution companies for resale to regulated customers must be made at fixed prices determined by public bids. Only a small part of the electricity purchased by distribution companies (included in old contracts) is still maintained at node prices. These are set annually by Osinergmin and are the maximum prices for electricity purchased by distribution companies that can be transferred to regulated customers in those contracts.

Distribution Tariffs to Final Customers

The electricity tariff for regulated customers includes charges for capacity and energy for generation and transmission and for the VAD which considers a regulated return on investments, operating and maintenance fixed charges and a standard percent for energy distribution losses.

Distribution Tariff-Setting Process

The VAD is set every four years. Osinergmin classifies companies into groups, according to “typical distribution areas”, based on economic factors that group companies with similar distribution costs due to population density, which determines equipment requirements in the network.

Actual return on investment for a distribution company depends on its performance relative to the standards chosen by the Osinergmin for a theoretical model company. The tariff system allows for a greater return for distribution companies that are more efficient than the model company. Tariff studies are performed by the Osinergmin and distribution companies. Preliminary tariffs are calculated as a weighted average of the results of the Osinergmin commissioned study and the companies’ study, with the results of the Osinergmin’s study bearing twice the weight of the companies’ study. Preliminary tariffs are then tested to ensure that they provide an average actual annual internal rate of return between 8% and 16% on the replacement cost of electricity-related distribution assets.

The new process of distribution tariffs setting have been in effect since November 2013 and will run through October 2017.

Regulatory Charges

The regulatory charges applied to the energy sales in distribution activities are:

• The contribution to regulatory authorities (Osinergmin, MINEM), which represents 1% of total sales.

• The Electrical Social Compensation Fund (“FOSE” in its Spanish acronym), created to promote permanent access to the public electricity service for low-income residential customers. This Fund established a cross subsidy system among customers that benefits customers with monthly consumption below 100 kWh through fixed and proportional discounts.

• The rural electrification charge is a contribution for promoting the efficient and sustainable electrification development in rural, isolated or frontier areas of the country. The contribution of the electricity customers is of 0.002 UIT (a tax unit) per MWh billed, with the exception of those which are not served by the SEIN.

108

Incentives and Penalties

Law 28,832 and DS 052-2007-EM (“General Regulations of the Supply Auctions”) affecting energy purchases state that if auctions are called for with an anticipation of over three years, distributors will receive a payment incentive which will be added to the generator price of the auctions, and then passed through to customers. This incentive cannot be higher than 3% of the tariffs applied.

The distribution concessionaire may lose its concession if it does not provide evidence of a guaranteed supply for the following 24 months, at a minimum, unless it has called for public auctions according to the current norm and has not received offers sufficient to comply with its total requirements for the established period.

Regulation in Transmission

Transmission activities are divided in two categories: “principal”, which are for common use and allow the flow of energy through the national grid; and “secondary”, which are those lines that connect a power plant with the national grid that connects principal transmission with the distribution network or that connect directly to certain final customers. Law 28,832 also defined “guaranteed transmission systems” and “supplementary transmission systems”, applicable to projects commissioned after the enactment of that law. Guaranteed system lines are the result of a public bid and supplementary system lines are freely constructed and exploited as private projects. Principal and guaranteed system lines are accessible to all generators and allow electricity to be delivered to all customers. Transmission concessionaires receive an annual fixed income, as well as variable tariff revenues and connection tolls per kW. The secondary and complementary system lines are accessible to all generators but are used to serve only certain customers who are responsible for making payments related to their use of the system.

Environmental Regulation

The environmental legal framework applicable to energy related activities in Peru is set forth in the Environmental Law (Law 28,611/2005) and in the Regulation for Environmental Protection regarding Electricity Activities (Supreme Decree 029-94-EM). The MINEM dictates the specific environmental legal dispositions applicable to electricity activities, and Osinergmin is in charge of supervising certain aspects of their application and implementation. According to the Environmental Law, the Peruvian Ministry of Environment has the principal duties of (i) designing the general environmental policies to every productive activity; and (ii) establishing the main guidelines of the different government authorities for their specific environmental sector regulations. During 2010, most supervision functions regarding the application and implementation of the Environmental Law’s dispositions were transferred from Osinergmin to the Peruvian Ministry of the Environment.

Renewable Energy Resources (“RER”) for electricity generation are considered to be from biomass, wind, solar, geothermal and tidal sources, plus hydroelectric plants whose installed capacity does not exceed 20 MW.

In 2008, the authority issued regulations to promote the use of RER. The principal investment incentives established by these regulations are (i) an objective percentage of national electricity consumption, set every five years, to be covered by RER-based electricity generation, not including hydroelectric plants (for the first five-year period, this percentage is 5%); (ii) through tenders of energy to be covered by RER, the winning investor is guaranteed a firm price for the energy injected into the system during the supply contract period of up to 20 years; and (iii) priority in the dispatch of load and access to transmission and distribution networks.

The second RER tender was made in August 2011 for the 1,300 GWh per year, which must be generated from non-hydroelectric sources. Out of 21 initiatives proposed, 473 GWh were awarded to three projects.

In addition, other regulations establish tax incentives, including (i) accelerated depreciation of assets for income tax purposes, and (ii) the advanced recovery of the sales tax. In 2011, the permanent congressional commission approved Law 29,764 extending these tax benefits through 2020.

109

Law 29,968/2012 created the National Environmental Certification Service for Sustainable Investments (“SENACE” in its Spanish acronym), a specialized public organization with technical autonomy and a separate legal constitution, reporting to the Peruvian Ministry of the Environment. This organization is responsible for reviewing and approving detailed environmental impact studies of public, private or mixed capital investment projects, whether national or multi-regional, that involve activities, construction and other commercial and service activities whose characteristics, importance and/or location can result in significant environmental impacts, with the exception of those expressly excluded by Supreme Decree with the consenting vote of the Council of Ministers.

SENACE seeks to implement just one system of environmental administrative procedures to guarantee sustainable investments through the implementation of a sole window of environmental certification.

Raw Materials

For information regarding Enersis’ raw materials, please see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk — Commodity Price Risk”.

C. Organizational Structure.

Principal Subsidiaries and Affiliates

We are part of a group led by the Italian company, Enel. Enel owns 92.1% of Endesa Spain, which beneficially owns 60.6% of Enersis directly and through its Spanish subsidiary, Endesa Latinoamérica. Enel publicly trades on the Milan Stock Exchange, is headquartered in Italy and primarily engaged in the energy sector, with a presence in 40 countries worldwide, and approximately 99 GW of net installed capacity. It provides service to more than 61 million customers through its electricity and gas businesses.

The following chart shows our most important operating subsidiaries and jointly-controlled companies as of December 31, 2013.

110

111

The companies listed in the following table were consolidated by us as of December 31, 2013. In the case of subsidiaries, our economic interest is calculated by multiplying our percentage economic interest in a directly held subsidiary by the percentage economic interest of any entity in the chain of ownership of such ultimate subsidiary.

Principal Subsidiaries and Country of Operations	% Economic Ownership of Main Subsidiary by Enersis		Consolidated Assets of Each Main Subsidiary		Operating Income of Each Main Subsidiary
	(in %)		(in billions of Ch$)
Electricity Generation
Endesa Chile (Chile) (1)		60.00		6,762.1		782.8
Endesa Fortaleza (Brazil)		83.54		214.0		49.0
Cachoeira Dourada (Brazil)		83.33		135.2		105.1
Dock Sud (Argentina)		57.14		98.6		(2.5)
EEPSA (Peru)		96.50		109.7		7.2
Electricity Transmission
CIEN (Brazil)		83.54		292.7		32.5
Electricity Distribution
Chilectra (Chile)		99.10		1,402.8		138.9
Ampla (Brazil)		91.63		1,277.0		172.2
Edesur (Argentina)		71.61		501.8		122.0
Edelnor (Peru)		75.54		585.0		84.1
Coelce (Brazil) (2)		49.18		789.9		61.4
Codensa (Colombia)		48.39		1,251.9		240.9
Other non-electricity businesses
IMV (Chile)		100.0		66.3		8.1

(1) Endesa Chile consolidates all generation facilities in Chile, Argentina, Colombia and Peru.

(2) As consequence of a voluntary tender offer carried out in February 2014, Enersis’ ownership increased to 74.0%. See “— Recent Developments”.

Generation and Transmission Segment

Endesa Chile (Chile)

Endesa Chile is a publicly held electricity generation company in Chile. On a stand-alone basis, excluding direct subsidiaries in Chile (described below), Endesa Chile has a total installed capacity of 5,571 MW as of December 31, 2013, with 17 generation facilities. Of the total installed capacity, 62% is from hydroelectric power plants, including Ralco with 690 MW, El Toro with 450 MW, Rapel with 377 MW, and Antuco with 320 MW, among others. Regarding our thermoelectric facilities, nearly 67% are gas/fuel oil power plants, and the rest are coal-fired steam power plants. Our economic interest in Endesa Chile is 60.0%.

Celta (Chile)

Celta was formed in 1995 to build and operate two thermoelectric plants in the SING: a coal-fired plant with an installed capacity of 158 MW and a gas/fuel oil power plant with 24 MW of installed capacity. On November 1, 2013, Endesa Eco (including San Isidro and Pangue) was merged into Celta. This merger was completed under the organizational simplification announced by Endesa Chile on February 29, 2012. Endesa Chile holds 96.2% of Celta’s share capital. Our economic interest in Celta is 61.5%.

Pehuenche (Chile)

Pehuenche, a generation company connected to the SIC, owns three hydroelectric facilities south of Santiago in the hydrological basin of the Maule River, with a total installed capacity of 699 MW. The 570 MW Pehuenche plant began operations in 1991, the 89 MW Curillinque plant began operations in 1993, and the 40 MW Loma Alta plant began operations in 1997. Endesa Chile holds 92.7% of Pehuenche. Our economic interest in Pehuenche is 55.6%.

112

Cemsa (Argentina)

Cemsa’s principal activities are electricity and fuel oil trading. Cemsa has executed several agreements with Argentine electricity power stations to support its supply contracts. The power stations that provide Cemsa’s electricity supply contracts are: Endesa Costanera, Dock Sud, Centrales Térmicas del Noroeste S.A., and El Chocón. Endesa Chile has an indirect ownership interest of 45% in Cemsa. Our economic interest in Cemsa is 82.0%.

Endesa Costanera (Argentina)

Endesa Costanera is a publicly held electricity generation company in Argentina, with 2,324 MW of total installed capacity in Buenos Aires, including six steam turbines with an aggregate capacity of 1,138 MW which burn oil and gas, and two natural gas combined-cycle facilities with a total capacity of 1,186 MW. Endesa Costanera was acquired from the Argentine government after the privatization ofServicios Eléctricos del Gran Buenos Aires S.A. Endesa Chile owns 75.7% of Endesa Costanera. Our economic interest in Endesa Costanera is 45.4%.

El Chocón (Argentina)

El Chocón is an electricity generation company, incorporated in Argentina, located between the Neuquén and Río Negro provinces, in the Comahue Basin in southern Argentina. It has two hydroelectric power stations with an aggregate installed capacity of 1,328 MW. A 30-year concession, which expires in 2023, was granted by the Argentine government to our subsidiary, Hidroinvest S.A., which bought 59.0% of the shares in July 1993 during the privatization process. Endesa Chile operates El Chocón for a fee pursuant to an operating agreement with a term equal to the duration of the concession. Endesa Chile beneficially owns 65.4% of El Chocón. Our economic interest in El Chocón is 39.2%.

Dock Sud (Argentina)

Dock Sud owns and operates a 870 MW generation facility consisting of two plants. Dock Sud’s power station has four gas turbines and one steam turbine. Two of the gas turbines and the steam turbine comprise a combined cycle power plant. Our economic interest in Dock Sud is 40.0%.

Edegel (Peru)

Edegel, an electricity generation company, was acquired by Endesa Chile in 1995. It currently owns seven hydroelectric plants and two thermal plants, with a combined installed capacity of 1,540 MW. In October 2009, Endesa Chile purchased an additional 29.4% stake in Edegel from Generalima S.A.C., a subsidiary of Enersis. Consequently, Endesa Chile increased its beneficial ownership in Edegel from 33.1% to 62.5%. Our economic interest in Edegel is 37.5%.

Edegel holds an 80% share of Chinango S.A.C., and Peruana de Energía S.A.A. (an unaffiliated entity) owns the remaining 20% share.

EEPSA (Peru)

EEPSA has 302 MW of generation capacity from two thermal plants: Malacas and Malacas II, located in the province of Talara-Piura, which operate using locally produced natural gas. Our economic interest in EEPSA is 96.5%.

Emgesa (Colombia)

Emgesa has a total installed generating capacity of 2,925 MW, 85% of which are hydroelectric power plants and 15% are thermoelectric power plants. Empresa de Energía de Bogotá S.A. has a direct 51.5% equity interest in Emgesa. Endesa Chile’s ownership in Emgesa is 26.9%; however, it has 31.3% of the voting rights, and due to a transfer of rights from Enersis, Endesa Chile has the right to appoint the majority of the Board members and, therefore, controls Emgesa. Our beneficial economic interest in Emgesa is 37.7%.

113

Endesa Brasil (Brazil)

In 2005, Endesa Brasil was formed to manage all Brazilian generation, transmission, and distribution assets that Endesa Latinoamérica, a subsidiary of Endesa Spain, held together with Enersis, Endesa Chile and Chilectra. Endesa Brasil consolidates operations of two generation companies Cachoeira Dourada and Endesa Fortaleza, the transmission company CIEN, as well as two distribution companies Ampla and Coelce. Enersis has a beneficial interest of 83.5% in Endesa Brasil.

Endesa Fortaleza (Brazil)

Endesa Fortaleza is a combined-cycle power plant of 322 MW fueled by natural gas, with a capacity to generate one-third of the electricity requirements of the State of Ceará, a state with a population of 8.2 million people. As of December 31, 2013, Endesa Fortaleza had a concession that expires in 18 years. Endesa Fortaleza is wholly-owned by Endesa Brasil. We hold a 83.5% economic interest in Endesa Fortaleza.

Cachoeira Dourada (Brazil)

Cachoeira Dourada is a hydro run-of-the-river plant using the flows from the Paranaiba River, with ten generating units totaling 665 MW of installed capacity, located in the State of Goias. Cachoeira Dourada began operations in 1997, and as of December 31, 2013 it had a concession that expires in 14 years. Endesa Brasil has a 99.6% ownership interest in Cachoeira Dourada and our economic interest is 83.3%.

CIEN (Brazil)

CIEN, a Brazilian transmission and trading company wholly-owned by Endesa Brasil, transmits electricity through two owned transmission lines between Argentina and Brazil covering a distance of 500 kilometers, with a total interconnection capacity of 2,100 MW. As of December 31, 2013, CIEN-Line 1 had a concession that expires in 7 years and CIEN-Line 2 had a concession that expires in 9 years. CIEN consolidates CTM and TESA, which operate the Argentine side of the interconnection line with Brazil. Our economic interest in CIEN is 83.5%.

Distribution Segment

Ampla (Brazil)

Ampla is the second largest electricity distribution company in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in terms of number of customers and annual energy sales. Ampla is engaged mainly in the distribution of electricity to 66 municipalities of the State of Rio de Janeiro and serves 2.8 million customers in a concession area of 32,615 square kilometers. As of December 31, 2013, Ampla had a concession that expires in 13 years. We have a 91.6% economic interest in Ampla.

Coelce (Brazil)

Coelce is the sole electricity distributor in the State of Ceará, in northeastern Brazil. As of December 31, 2013, Coelce served more than 3.5 million customers within a concession area of 148,825 square kilometers. As of December 31, 2013, Coelce had a concession that expires in 14 years. As of December 2013, we held a 49.2% economic interest in Coelce. As consequence of a voluntary tender offer carried out in February 2014, our’ ownership interests increased to 74.0%. See “— Recent Developments”.

Chilectra (Chile)

Chilectra is one of the largest electricity distribution companies in Chile as measured by the number of regulated customers, distribution assets and energy sales. Chilectra operates in a concession area of 2,118 square kilometers in the Santiago metropolitan area serving approximately 1.7 million customers. Our economic interest in Chilectra is 99.1%.

114

Edesur (Argentina)

Edesur is the second largest electricity distribution company in Argentina in terms of energy purchases. Edesur operates in a concession area of 3,309 square kilometers in the south-central part of the greater Buenos Aires metropolitan area serving approximately 2.4 million customers under a concession that expires in 74 years. Our economic interest in Edesur is 71.6%.

Codensa (Colombia)

Codensa, an electricity distribution company that serves a concession area of 18,217 square kilometers in Bogotá and 96 other municipalities in the provinces of Cundinamarca, Tolima and Boyacá, amounting to approximately 2.7 million customers. Our economic interest in Codensa is 48.4%. In addition, we appoint the majority of its Board members, and we therefore control Codensa.

Edelnor (Peru)

Edelnor, a Peruvian electricity distribution company, operates in a concession area of 1,517 square kilometers. It has an exclusive concession to distribute electricity in the northern part of the Lima metropolitan area, some provinces in the Lima region such as Huaral, Huaura, Barranca and Oyón, and in the adjacent province of Callao. As of December 31, 2013, Edelnor distributed electricity to approximately 1.3 million customers. We hold a 75.5% economic interest in Edelnor.

Inmobiliaria Manso de Velasco (Chile)

Inmobiliaria Manso de Velasco, a wholly-owned subsidiary, develops real estate projects in Chile and represents less than 0.2% of our 2013 operating revenues before consolidation adjustments.

Selected Related and Jointly-Controlled Companies

HidroAysén (Chile)

HidroAysén was incorporated in March 2007. Endesa Chile has a 51% ownership interest and Colbún S.A. the remaining 49%. The company was created to develop and exploit a hydroelectric project located in the Aysén region, in the southern region of Chile. Our economic interest in HidroAysén is 30.6%.

GasAtacama (Chile)

Endesa Chile has a 50% beneficial interest in GasAtacama, located in the northern region of Chile. GasAtacama has a four-unit combined cycle power plant of 780 MW and a gas pipeline that allows for the import of gas from Argentina. Since 2007, Southern Cross Latin America Private Equity Fund III, L.P. owns the remaining 50% beneficial interest. We hold a 30.7% economic interest in GasAtacama.

Transquillota (Chile)

Transquillota was incorporated in June 1997, as part of an agreement between San Isidro and Colbún, for the joint development of a 220 kV transmission line for dispatching the energy produced and connecting San Isidro (which is now merged with Celta, an Endesa Chile subsidiary) and Nehuenco (a subsidiary of Colbún) plants to the Central Interconnected Electric System (SIC). The 220 kV transmission line is 8 kilometers long. The property is equally divided among Endesa Chile and Nehuenco. Endesa Chile’s economic interest is 50%. Our economic interest in Transquillota is 30.7%.

115

Yacylec (Argentina)

Yacylec is an Argentine electricity transmission company. As of December 31, 2013, Yacylec had a concession that expires in 75 years. The transmission system Yacylec is comprised of:

• Three 500 kV transmission lines, 4 kilometers long each, from the Hidroeléctrica Yaciretá power station up to the Rincón de Santa María transformer station.

• The 500 kV Rincón de Santa María transformer station, in the province of Corrientes.

• A 500 kV transmission line (296 kilometers long), from the Rincón de Santa María transformer station up to the Resistencia transformer station, and an expansion of the Resistencia transformer station, in the province of Chaco.

• A communications system.

Our economic interest in Yacylec is 22.2%.

D. Property, Plant and Equipment.

Our property, plant and equipment is concentrated primarily on electricity generation, distribution and transmission assets in the five countries in which we operate.

Property, Plant and Equipment of Generating Companies

We conduct our generation and transmission businesses through our subsidiaries, Endesa Chile and Endesa Brasil. In Chile, Endesa Chile owns 27 generation power plants. Endesa Chile also consolidates revenues from other non wholly-owned generation companies in Argentina, Colombia and Peru, which involve an additional 28 generation power plants. We conduct our Brazilian operations through Endesa Brasil and consolidate revenues from two other generation power plants. We have an aggregate of 57 power plants in South America. Through Endesa Brasil, we also own and operate a transmission system consisting of two 500 kilometer 2,100 MW transmission lines that link Rincón de Santa María in Argentina with Itá in the State of Santa Catarina in Brazil.

A substantial portion of our generating subsidiaries’ cash flow and net income is derived from the sale of electricity produced by its electricity generation facilities. Significant damage to one or more of their main electricity generation facilities or interruption in the production of electricity, whether as a result of an earthquake, flood, volcanic activity or any other such cause, could have a material adverse effect on their operations. Our generating subsidiaries insure all electricity generation facilities against damage due to earthquakes, fires, floods, other acts of god (but not for prolonged droughts, which are aforce majeure risk not covered by insurance companies) and from damage due to third-party actions, based on the appraised value of the facilities as determined from time to time by an independent appraiser. Based on geological, hydrological and engineering studies, management believes that the risk of an event with a material adverse effect is remote. Claims under our generating subsidiaries’ insurance policies are subject to customary deductibles and other conditions. We also maintain business interruption insurance providing for coverage for failure of any of our facilities for a period of up to 24 months, including the deductible period.

The insurance coverage taken for non-Chilean property is approved by each company’s management, taking into account the quality of the insurance companies and the needs, conditions and risk evaluations of each generating facility, and is based on general corporate guidelines.

All insurance policies are purchased from reputable international insurers. We continuously monitor and meet with the insurance companies in order to obtain what we believe is the most commercially reasonable insurance coverage.

116

The following table identifies the power plants that we own, at the end of each year, and their basic characteristics:

			Installed Capacity
Country/Company	Power Plant Name	Power Plant Type (1)	2013		2012		2011
Chile			(in MW)
Endesa Chile
	Rapel	Reservoir		377		377		377
	Cipreses	Reservoir		106		106		106
	El Toro	Reservoir		450		450		450
	Los Molles	Pass-through		18		18		18
	Sauzal	Pass-through		77		77		77
	Sauzalito	Pass-through		12		12		12
	Isla	Pass-through		70		70		70
	Antuco	Pass-through		320		320		320
	Abanico	Pass-through		136		136		136
	Ralco	Reservoir		690		690		690
	Palmucho	Pass-through		34		34		34
	Total hydroelectric			2,290		2,290		2,290
	Bocamina (2)	Steam Turbine/Coal		478		478		128
	Diego de Almagro	Gas Turbine/ Diesel Oil		24		24		24
	Huasco	Gas Turbine/IFO 180 Oil		64		64		64
	Taltal	Gas Turbine/Natural     Gas+Diesel Oil		245		245		245
	San Isidro 2	Combined Cycle /Natural     Gas+Diesel Oil		399		399		399
	Quintero	Gas Turbine/Natural     Gas+Diesel Oil		257		257		257
	Total thermal			1,467		1,467		1,117
	Total			3,757		3,757		3,407
Pehuenche	Pehuenche	Reservoir		570		570		570
	Curillinque	Pass-through		89		89		89
	Loma Alta	Pass-through		40		40		40
Pangue (3)	Pangue	Reservoir		—		—		467
	Total			699		699		699
San Isidro (3) (4)	San Isidro	Combined Cycle /Natural     Gas+Diesel Oil		—		379		379
	Pangue	Reservoir		—		467		—
	Total			—		846		379
Endesa Eco (4)	Canela	Wind Farm		—		18		18
	Canela II	Wind Farm		—		60		60
	Ojos de Agua	Pass-through		—		9		9
	Total			—		87		87
Celta (4)	Tarapacá	Steam Turbine/Coal		158		158		158
	Tarapacá	Gas Turbine/Diesel Oil		24		24		24
	San Isidro	Combined Cycle /Natural     Gas+Diesel Oil		379		—		—
	Pangue	Reservoir		467		—		—
	Canela	Wind Farm		18		—		—
	Canela II	Wind Farm		60		—		—
	Ojos de Agua	Pass-through		9		—		—
	Total			1,115		182		182
Total capacity in Chile (5)				5,571		5,571		5,221

(1) “Reservoir” and “pass-through” refer to hydroelectric plants that use the force of a dam or a river, respectively, to move the turbines which generate electricity. “Steam” refers to thermal power plants fueled with natural gas, coal, diesel or fuel oil to produce steam that moves the turbines. “Gas Turbine” (“GT”) or “Open Cycle” refers to thermal power that uses either diesel or natural gas to produce gas that moves the turbines. “Combined Cycle” refers to a thermal power plant fueled with natural gas, diesel oil, or fuel oil to generate gas that first moves a turbine and then recovers the gas that escapes from that process to generate steam to move a second turbine.

(2) On October 28, 2012, Bocamina II (350 MW) commenced commercial operation.

(3) Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. was merged with San Isidro on May 2, 2012. San Isidro was the surviving company.

(4) San Isidro S.A. merged with Endesa Eco S.A. on September 1, 2013, and the latter remained the surviving company. Subsequently, Endesa Eco S.A. merged with Celta S.A. on November 1, 2013, and Celta S.A. remained as the surviving company.

(5) For comparative purposes we have subtracted 50% of the capacity of our jointly-controlled company, GasAtacama (390 MW for 2011 and 2012 figures) since we account for it under the equity method as of January 1, 2013 pursuant to IFRS 11.

117

			Installed Capacity
Country/Company	Power Plant Name	Power Plant Type (1)	2013		2012		2011
			(in MW)
Argentina
Endesa Costanera
	Endesa Costanera Steam Turbine	Steam Turbine/Natural Gas+     Fuel Oil		1,138		1,138		1,138
	Endesa Costanera Combined Cycle II	Combined Cycle/Natural     Gas+Diesel Oil		859		859		859
	Central Buenos Aires Combined Cycle I	Combined Cycle/Natural Gas		327		327		327
	Total			2,324		2,324		2,324
El Chocón
	Chocón	Reservoir		1,200		1,200		1,200
	Arroyito	Pass-through		128		128		128
	Total			1,328		1,328		1,328
Dock Sud (1)
	Dock Sud CC	Combined Cycle/Natural     Gas+Diesel Oil		798		—		—
	Dock Sud TG	Gas Turbine/Natural     Gas+Diesel Oil		72		—		—
	Total			870		—		—
Total capacity in Argentina				4,522		3,652		3,652
Brazil
Cachoeira Dourada	Cachoeira Dourada	Pass-through		665		665		665
Endesa Fortaleza	Endesa Fortaleza	Combined Cycle/Gas		322		322		322
Total capacity in Brazil				987		987		987

(1) As a result of the 2013 capital increase, Enersis began accounting for Dock Sud on a consolidated basis as of April 1, 2013.

118

			Installed Capacity
Country/Company	Power Plant Name	Power Plant Type (1)	2013		2012		2011
			(in MW)
Colombia
Emgesa
	Guavio	Reservoir		1,213		1,213		1,213
	Paraíso	Reservoir		276		276		276
	La Guaca	Pass-through		325		325		325
	Termozipa	Steam Turbine/Coal		236		236		236
	Cartagena	Steam Turbine/ Natural Gas		208		208		208
	Minor plants (1)	Pass-through		77		116		116
	Betania	Reservoir		541		541		541
	Dario Valencia (2)	Pass-through		50		—		—
	Total			2,926		2,914		2,914
Total capacity in Colombia				2,926		2,914		2,914
Peru
Edegel
	Huinco	Pass-through		247		247		247
	Matucana (3)	Pass-through		133		129		129
	Callahuanca	Pass-through		80		80		80
	Moyopampa	Pass-through		66		66		66
	Huampani	Pass-through		30		30		30
	Santa Rosa (4) (5)	Gas Turbine/Diesel Oil		305		426		429
	Ventanilla (4)	Combined Cycle/Natural Gas		485		485		493
	Total			1,346		1,463		1,474
Chinango
	Yanango	Pass-through		43		43		43
	Chimay	Pass-through		151		151		151
	Total			194		194		194
EEPSA	Malacas (6) (7)	Gas Turbine/Natural Gas+Diesel Oil		302		—		—
	Total			302		—		—
Total capacity in Peru				1,842		1,657		1,668
Consolidated capacity				15,848		14,781		14,442

(1) Minor plants have an aggregate capacity of 77 MW. As of December 31, 2013 Emgesa owned and operated four minor plants: Charquito, El Limonar, Tequendama and San Antonio. In October 2013, the La Tinta (19.5 MW) and La Junca (19.5 MW) were decommissioned.

(2) In November 2013, the Dario Valencia (50 MW) power plant began commercial operations.

(3) In June 2013, the Matucana power plant increased its installed capacity by 4 MW.

(4) The installed capacity of this power plant in 2012 was the result of tests made by the Comité de Operación Económica del Sistema (“COES”).

(5) In October 2013, unit TG 7 (121 MW) of the Santa Rosa power plant was decommissioned.

(6) As a result of the 2013 capital increase, Enersis began consolidating EEPSA as of April 2013.

(7) The installed capacity of this generation power plant was reduced by 0.79 MW in August 2013, according to test performed by the COES.

As of December 31, 2013, we received the ISO 14,001 certification for 97.8% of our installed capacity in South America, which included 56 out of 57 generation facilities that produced 96.5% of the total annual generation in accordance with the ISO 14,001 standard.

119

Property, Plant and Equipment of Transmission and Distribution Companies

We also have significant interests or investments in electricity distribution. The description for each distribution company is included in this “Item 4. Information on the Company”. The table set forth below describes our main equipment used for our distribution business, such as transmission lines, substations, distribution networks and transformers.

We are insured against damage to substations, transformers that are within the substations, the distribution network that is less one kilometer from the substations and administrative buildings. Risks covered include losses caused by fires, explosions, earthquakes, floods, lightning, damage to machinery and other such events. Insurance policies include liability clauses, which protect our companies from complaints made by third parties.

Transmission lines and the equipment attached to them do not qualify as insurable assets for property damage, although they have insurance policies including civil liability clauses for damages against third parties caused by these transmission installations. This criteria applies in the case of the Argentina-Brazil interconnection line, our main transmission asset, for which there is insurance coverage for damage to the assets and civil liability for the Garabí conversion station, the Argentina/Brazil connection substations and up to one kilometer of lines from the substations. Only third-party liability coverage is applicable for the rest of the transmission lines.

TABLE OF DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES

General Characteristics

	Location	Concession Area		Transmission Lines (1)
				2013		2012		2011
		(in km2)		(in kilometers)
Chilectra	Chile		2,118		355		355		355
Edesur	Argentina		3,302		1,115		1,146		1,139
Ampla	Brazil		32,615		2,363		2,363		2,339
Coelce	Brazil		148,825		4,875		4,628		4,504
Codensa	Colombia		14,494		1,247		1,247		1,246
Edelnor (2)	Peru		1,517		501		471		464
Total (3)			202,871		10,456		10,210		10,047

(1) The transmission lines consist of circuits with voltages in the 27-220 kV range.

(2) The concession area figure differs from previous disclosures as it was reviewed in 2012 and updated accordingly.

(3) Excludes 49% of figures corresponding to our jointly-controlled company, EEC, for 2011 and 2012 previously reported, since we account for EEC under the equity method as of January 1, 2013.

Power and Interconnection Substations and Transformers (1)

	2013						2012						2011
	Number of Substations		Number of Transformers		Capacity (MVA)		Number of Substations		Number of Transformers		Capacity (MVA)		Number of Substations		Number of Transformers		Capacity (MVA)
Chilectra		54		160		7,598		54		157		7,448		53		155		7,023
Edesur		67		170		11,599		68		174		11,607		66		171		11,547
Ampla		117		223		4,695		117		223		4,542		116		221		4,452
Coelce		106		170		2,620		102		161		2,467		99		160		2,406
Codensa		61		231		8,875		61		229		8,795		61		225		8,619
Edelnor		33		76		3,325		32		73		3,050		30		69		2,883
Total (2)		438		1,030		38,712		434		1,017		37,909		425		1,001		36,930

(1) Voltage of these transformers is in the range of 500 kV (high voltage) and 7 kV (medium voltage).

120

(2) Excludes 49% of figures corresponding to our jointly-controlled company, EEC, for 2011 and 2012 previously reported, since we account for EEC under the equity method as of January 1, 2013.

Distribution Network - Medium and Low Voltage Lines (1)

	2013				2012				2011
	Medium Voltage		Low Voltage		Medium Voltage		Low Voltage		Medium Voltage		Low Voltage
					(in Kilometers)
Chilectra		5,111		10,838		5,070		10,655		4,993		10,476
Edesur		7,417		16,021		7,373		16,007		7,347		15,985
Ampla		34,000		17,858		33,642		17,600		33,078		17,459
Coelce		82,244		48,951		81,460		47,968		79,759		46,115
Codensa		19,902		27,825		19,563		27,285		19,276		23,586
Edelnor		4,191		21,402		4,064		20,731		3,854		19,826
Total (2)		152,865		142,895		151,172		140,246		148,307		133,447

(1) Medium voltage lines: 7 kV—34.5 kV; low voltage lines: 380-110 V.

(2) Excludes 49% of figures corresponding to our jointly-controlled company, EEC, for 2011 and 2012 previously reported, since we account for EEC under the equity method as of January 1, 2013.

Transformers for Distribution (1)

	2013				2012				2011
	Number of Transformers		Capacity		Number of Transformers		Capacity		Number of Transformers		Capacity
			(in MVA)				(in MVA)				(in MVA)
Chilectra		28,893		7,313		28,570		7,011		28,384		6,782
Edesur		22,912		5,918		23,195		5,781		23,520		5,651
Ampla		115,024		4,483		113,256		4,338		110,473		4,115
Coelce		140,336		4,655		137,729		4,593		134,132		4,508
Codensa		67,727		8,710		66,720		8,306		66,570		8,301
Edelnor		10,368		1,617		10,122		1,519		9,878		1,443
Total (2)		385,260		32,696		379,592		31,548		372,957		30,800

(1) Voltage of these transformers is in the range of 34.5 kV (medium voltage) and 110 V (low voltage).

(2) Excludes 49% of figures corresponding to our jointly-controlled company, EEC, for 2011 and 2012 previously reported, since we account for EEC under the equity method as of January 1, 2013.

Projects under Construction

Colombia. El Quimbo Hydroelectric Project

El Quimbo hydroelectric project is located in the province of Huila, on the Magdalena River, upstream of the Betania power plant. Its installed capacity will be 400 MW through two generation units. The construction began in December 2010 and completion is expected by July 2015.

In 2008, as a result of the awarding process, Emgesa assumed a firm energy obligation for El Quimbo starting in December 2014 and increasing annually from 1.1 GWh/day during the first year up to 4.5 GWh/day from December 2017 to November 2034. In 2009, the Colombian Ministry of the Environment approved the environmental license and granted building permission

The principal contracts, corresponding to the civil works and the manufacturing, supply and assembly of the equipment, were awarded to the Impregilo-OHL consortium and the Alstom-Schrader Camargo consortium.

121

The main advances in construction in 2013 were:

• In February 2013 we finished phase one of the dam fillings.

• In June 2013 we started activities associated with the “Construction of Substitutes for Roads and Bridges” contract.

• In October 2013 the beam tracks for assembling the first bridge crane were in place.

In accordance with the equipment contract, we received the first turbine parts for the first unit at the site on December 3, 2012. In April 2013, we received the predistributor of unit 1, and in August, we received the predistributor of unit 2.

This project is being financed primarily with external sources, through local and international bonds. The estimated total investment is Ch$ 699,179 million, of which Ch$ 342,696 million was accrued as of December 31, 2013.

Colombia. Salaco Hydroelectric Project

The Salaco project consists of adding 145 MW of capacity to the current hydro cascade of the Bogotá River, through major maintenance and modernization of six generating units that have been out of service. The units to be refurbished are located in three generating stations: Salto II (increasing capacity from 19.4 MW to 35.0 MW), Laguneta (increasing capacity from 18.0 MW to 36.0 MW) and Dario Valencia (increasing capacity from 38.8 MW to 150.0 MW), all of which were previously being marginally dispatched as small hydro plants. The increase in capacity will generate an additional 482 GWh per year, approximately.

Renovation work began in February 2013, and is expected to be completed in 2015. On November 6, 2013, Dario Valencia’s HPP unit 2 (50.0 MW) resumed commercial operation.

This project is being financed with internally generated funds. The total estimated investment is Ch$ 22,925 million of which Ch$ 11,332 million was accrued as of December 31, 2013.

Projects Under Development

The total investment of each project described below was translated into Chilean pesos at the exchange rate of Ch$ 524.61 per U.S. dollar, the Observed Exchange Rate for December 31, 2013. Budgeted amounts include connecting lines that could eventually be owned by third parties and paid as tolls, unless otherwise indicated.

We continuously analyze different growth opportunities in the countries in which we participate. Thus, the expected start-up for each project is continuously assessed and will be defined based on the commercial opportunities and our financing capacity to fund these projects. The most relevant projects in the pipeline are as follows:

Generation Business

Chile. Los Cóndores Hydroelectric Project

The Los Cóndores project will be located in the Maule region. It consists of a150 MW run-of-river hydroelectric power plant, which will use water from the Maule Lake reservoir through a 12 kilometer penstock. The power plant will be connected to the SIC at the Ancoa substation (220 kV) through an 87 kilometer transmission line.

The feasibility study for the project has been completed. It considers the use of TBM technology (Tunnel Boring Machine), which is more efficient, has higher safety standards and a lower environmental impact for the construction of the tunnel connecting the project to the Maule Lake. The environmental permit for this generation power plant was obtained in 2011. Basic engineering was completed at the end of 2011.

122

The transmission line project received its environmental qualification resolution in May 2012, and in May 2013, some administrative claims were solved and the transmission project obtained its final approval. In November 2013, Endesa Chile obtained an hydraulic work permit authorizing the river course change for the construction of the plant.

Construction is expected to start during 2014 and completion is estimated for 2018. This project is being financed primarily with internally generated funds. The estimated total investment is Ch$ 394,960 million, of which Ch$ 18,972 million was accrued as of December 31, 2013.

Chile. Neltume Hydroelectric Project

The Neltume project is located in Los Ríos region, on the upper part of the Valdivia River basin. The Neltume project consists of a 490 MW installed capacity run-of-river hydro power plant that will be connected to the SIC through a 42 kilometer 220 kV transmission line from Neltume to Pullinque.

The Neltume power generation project has been under the environmental assessment process since December 2010. During 2011, basic engineering studies began and supplementary studies for environmental process were carried out. During 2012, basic engineering studies were completed.

During 2013, we prepared and submitted supplemental information Addenda Number 4 to the environmental authority, both for the plant and for the transmission line, in response to a fourth consolidated observations report (ICSARA Number 4) issued by the Environmental Evaluation Service (“SEA”). During the second half of 2013, the SEA initiated the indigenous consultation process to the communities in the area, so as to know their position about the project and comply with Convention Number 169. “Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention” of the International Labor Organization (“ILO”).

Construction is expected to start during 2016 and completion is expected for 2021. This project is being financed primarily with internally generated funds. The estimated total investment is Ch$ 456,905 million, of which Ch$ 23,590 million was accrued as of December 31, 2013.

Chile. HidroAysén Hydroelectric Project

The HidroAysén hydroelectric project consists of five hydroelectric power plants, with an aggregated installed capacity of 2,750 MW, two of which are in the Baker River (660 MW and 360 MW) and the other three are in the Pascua River (770 MW, 500 MW and 460 MW). The transmission project will be defined depending on the substation where the complex will be connected to the SIC.

On May 9, 2011, the environmental authority approved the Environmental Impact Assessment Study presented for the HidroAysén project, with some environmental observations. However, opponents to the project presented 34 claims and HidroAysén presented one claim, all requesting the review of certain requirements established by the environmental authority. In January 2014, during president Piñera’s government, the majority of these claims were resolved by the Council of Ministers, consisting of six public cabinet members and presided over by the Minister of the Environment. Although the Council should have taken 60 business days to resolve the matters, it took over two years, and it requested additional studies in order to resolve the pending claims.

In March 2014, President Michelle Bachelet took office, and during this month a new Council of Ministers was convened, and it repealed the decisions taken in January 2014. The new Council stated it would study the issue again and resolve all claims within the 60 business day timeframe established by law.

123

As of May 2011 (the last project budget review), the estimated investment for Endesa Chile’s 51% participation in HidroAysén had been in the range of US$ 2,700 to US$ 3,200 million. However, the Company is not able to estimate future capital expenditures or an expected start up date because the final Council of Ministers resolution is still pending. The project is expected to be financed through internally generated funds and, if needed, external financing. As of December 31, 2013 Ch$ 83,223 million has been accrued.

Chile. Punta Alcalde Power Plant

The project consists of the construction of two 370 MW coal-fired thermoelectric power plants located in the Atacama region, totaling 740 MW of installed capacity. The plant will be connected to the SIC at the Maitencillo substation (220 kV) through a 44 kilometer transmission line.

In 2009, we completed and submitted an Environmental Impact Study (EIA) of the generation project to the SEA, which initiated the required environmental assessment process. In 2012, the regional environmental authority rejected the project. We appealed to the Council of Ministers. Even though it unanimously reversed the decision of the environmental authority, the Court of Appeals accepted four injunctions against us in early 2013. Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the project in January 2014.

In June 2013, we completed and submitted an Environmental Impact Study (EIA) of the transmission line project to the SEA, which initiated the required environmental assessment process. Construction is expected to start during 2016 and completion is expected for 2020. This project is being financed primarily with internally generated funds. The estimated total investment is Ch$ 837,318 million, of which Ch$ 14,491 million was accrued as of December 31, 2013.

Chile. Renaico Wind Farm

This project is located in the ninth region of Chile, in the town of Renaico. It consists of 44 wind generators of 2 MW each, with a bushing height of 95 meters and a total generation capacity of 255 GWh per year. The energy produced will be injected into the SIC by two transmission lines: (i) the main line, which will consist of a 27 kilometer, 220 kV simple-circuit line to Bureo substation and (ii) a secondary line, which will consist of a 66 kV line that will tap into Renaico-Angol transmission line.

During 2012, the project’s basic engineering was finished and tendering processes were initiated for the project’s main contracts. The environmental qualification resolutions for the wind farm and the main transmission line were also obtained. During 2013, the tendering process for the supply of equipment, internal connections, transmission line, substation and the transforming equipment were carried out.

After completing the tendering process and making the decision to invest in the project, construction will start be initiated and is expected to last 18 months. This project is being financed primarily with internally generated funds. The estimated total investment is Ch$ 118,118 million, of which Ch$ 3,007 million was accrued as of December 31, 2013.

Chile. Taltal Combined Cycle

The project consists of the construction of a steam turbine for converting the existing Taltal gas-fired open cycle plant to a combined cycle plant by adding a turbine in the vapor phase, which would use the steam generated by the gas turbines’ heat emissions to produce energy. Currently, the existing Taltal power plant has two gas turbines of 123 MW each. The extra power to be added by the steam turbine would be approximately 120 MW and therefore, the Taltal power plant would achieve a total capacity of 366 MW and an efficiency increase.

In December 2013, an optimized Environmental Impact Statement was submitted for approval to the Environmental Evaluation Service. The main optimization relates to a change in the cooling system, which was originally designed as a wet system (using sea water) and is being modified to a dry cooling system. The energy produced will be supplied to the SIC through the existing 220 kV double circuit Diego de Almagro – Paposo transmission line.

124

Construction is expected to begin in 2015 and is expected to be completed in 2017. This project is being financed primarily with internally generated funds. The estimated total investment is Ch$ 131,250 million, of which Ch$ 1,486 million was accrued as of December 31, 2013.

Brazil. Tapajós Hydroelectric Complex

The Tapajós complex (10.7 GW) is located in the state of Pará and consists of five hydroelectric power plants: São Luiz do Tapajós (6,133 MW), Jatobá (2,338 MW), Cachoeira do Caí (802 MW), Jamanxim (881 MW) and Cachoeira dos Patos (528 MW).

In order to conduct the feasibility and environmental studies of the complex, Endesa Brasil joined eight other companies (state-owned companies Eletrobras, Eletronorte, Cemig and Copel, and publicly-held companies EDF, Neoenergia, GDF/Suez and Camargo Corrêa).

Progress in 2013 was focused on São Luiz do Tapajós and Jatobá, resulting in significant advances in both feasibility and environmental studies. The São Luiz do Tapajós feasibility study was finished during 2013, while its environmental study is expected to be concluded by mid-2014. The environmental study for Jatobá made significant progress and its feasibility study will start once the required indigenous studies are concluded.

We expect São Luiz do Tapajós’s auction will take place during 2014, with construction starting in 2015 and completion in 2023. The total investment is estimated to be Ch$ 6,243 billion, of which Endesa Brasil has accrued Ch$ 2,046 million as of December 31, 2013.

Should positive results from the environmental and feasibility studies be achieved, Endesa Brasil will consider its participation in the project. The share of the total investment will dependend on the structure of the consortium formed to participate in the project’s auction.

We expect Jatobá’s auction will be carried out in 2015, with construction starting in 2016 and completion in 2023. The total investment is estimated to be Ch$ 3,095 billion, of which Endesa Brasil has accrued Ch$ 1,416 million, as of December 31, 2013.

Although financing for the complex has not yet been established, we expect it to be a mix of internally generated funds and BNDES debt. BNDES offers special credit lines for generation projects.

In December 2013, ANEEL postponed the deadline for concluding Cachoeira do Caí, Jamanxim and Cachoeira dos Patos studies until December 2015. These projects will be evaluated as Brazil’s electricity demand grows and their construction is not expected to begin before 2017. The total investment for these plants is estimated at Ch$ 2,151 billion. No amounts were accrued in these projects as of December 31, 2013.

Brazil. Tabajara Hydroelectric Project

Tabajara consists of a 350 MW hydroelectric power plant to be located in Río Ji-Paraná, state of Rondônia.

In 2012, Endesa Brasil joined with Eletronorte, Furnas and Queiroz Galvão in order to conduct environmental and feasibility studies. These studies are under development and are expected to be concluded in mid-2014. The project’s auction is expected to take place during 2015, with construction starting in 2016 and completion expected for 2020.

Should it obtain positive results from the environmental and feasibility studies, Endesa Brasil will consider its participation in the project. The share of the total investment will be dependent on the structure of the consortium formed to participate in the project’s development.

125

Although financing for the complex has not yet been established, we expect it to be a mix of internally generated funds and BNDES debt. The total investment is estimated at Ch$ 481,592 million of which Endesa Brasil has accrued Ch$ 1,941 million as of December 31, 2013. Should positive results from the environmental and feasibility studies be returned, Endesa Brasil will consider its participation in the project. The share of the total investment will be dependent on the structure of the consortium formed to participate in the project’s auction.

Brazil. Hydroelectric Plants on the River Aripuanã

Endesa Brasil has joined Eletronorte for developing Sumaúma’s (458 MW) studies and analyze its eventual participation in the project’s auction. Sumauma will be located in the Amazonas state and will use the waters of the Aripuanã River.

Sumaúma’s auction may take place during 2015, with construction starting in 2016 and completion is expected for 2020. The total investment is estimated at Ch$ 681,993 million. As of December 31, 2013, Endesa Brasil has accrued Ch$ 630 million.

Should it obtain positive results from the environmental and feasibility studies, Endesa Brasil will consider its participation in the project. The share of the total investment will be dependent on the structure of the consortium formed to participate in the project’s developmenet.

Although financing for the complex has not yet been established, we expect it to be a mix of internally generated funds and BNDES debt.

Brazil. Carnaúba Combined Cycle

Carnaúba consists of a 370 MW natural gas combined-cycle thermoelectric power plant to be located on Fortaleza’s site. All engineering studies have been completed and the project holds an environmental license and water use permits. The gas supply agreements are currently under negotiation.

Endesa Brasil expects to participate with this process in the energy auctions to be carried out by the government during 2014 in order to start construction in 2015, depending on the schedule to be established by the authority.

Although financing for the complex has not yet been decided, we expect it to be a mix of internally generated funds and BNDES debt. The total investment is estimated at Ch$ 238,698 million, of which Ch$ 52 million has been accrued as of December 31, 2013.

Peru. Curibamba Hydroelectric Project

Curibamba consists of a 188 MW run-of-river power plant and a 134 kilometer transmission line that will connect it to the national interconnected system at Pachachaca substation (220 kV). This power plant will be located 385 kilometers northeast of Lima, upstream of Chimay hydroelectric power plant (province of Junín), and will use the waters of the Comas and Uchubamba rivers (86 m3/s) through an 8.1 kilometer penstock.

During 2013, the EIA study for the first section of the transmission line (Curibamba – Oroya Nueva, 112 kilometers) was approved, while the EIA study for the second section (Oroya Nueva – Pachachaca, 22 kilometers) is currently in its final stage of assessment. In addition, archaeological permits were successfully obtained for the transmission line and the electrical connection study that was submitted in 2012 obtained COES approval. All documents required to obtain the electricity concession were presented to the authority in December 2013.

The project’s bidding process for the project’s main contracts (civil works, equipment supply and electrical interconnection) is expected to take place during 2014, and construction is expected to start during the first quarter of 2015 with completion scheduled for 2019. This project is being financed primarily with internally generated funds, with an estimated total investment of Ch$ 236,075 million, of which Ch$ 10,755 million has been accrued as of December 31, 2013.

126

Distribution Business

Argentina

In 2013, Edesur invested Ch$ 49,381 million in projects aimed at maintaining the quality of service and protecting public safety, among which we can highlight the Pérez Galdós station reconversion project and the extension of the substation Almirante Brown. On the other hand, Edesur also invested in the medium voltage network telecontrol project that incorporates 143 new transformer centers. The commencement of our winter and summer plans focused on counteracting the increase in demand due to air conditioning needs along with the general contingencies plan and the public safety management system due to extraordinary circumstances occurred on April 2, December 2 and December 16, 2013.

As for innovation and energy effficiency matters, Edesur inaugurated its first load station for electrical vehicles in Argentina and replaced halogen lamps for LED lighting devices in their buildings.

Brazil

In order to reduce energy theft across various customer segments and comply with the obligations established by the last tariff-setting process of the regulatory authority, Ampla invested a total of Ch$ 22,905 million in loss control systems and reached a recovery of 303 GWh during the last two years.

Chile

During 2013, investments for Ch$ 47,884 million were made in projects focused on satisfying the increase of demand regarding energy, quality of service, safety, information and telecontrol systems and loss control. Among them, a 150 MVA extension in transformation capacity, particularly in substations Chacabuco, San Cristóbal and Recoleta; and the upgrade of high voltage networks which involved investments to strengthen the 110 KV lines of Chena-Cerro Navia and substations Lo Boza and San José.

Finally, investment to increase medium voltage network automation continued by incorporating 91 new telecontrolled equipment. Also, a special plan for the 127 existing equipment units in the network with telecontrol capacity was implemented, which permitted the addition of 100 units to the SCADA system during 2013 and 191 new exploitation units. Additionally, auto-reconfiguration of the medium voltage network in Portezuelo and Aguas Claras feeders focused on improving the quality of service in the Lampa area.

Colombia

In 2013, Codensa invested Ch$ 71,353 million in projects meant to ensure the sustainability and growth of the distribution business. Among them, 70,953 new connections corresponding to network extensions and new customers and 984 street lighting system extensions including 2,365 new light points were made. As for networks, projects for capacity extension were also performed, 2,082 distribution transformers were changed and 4,758 obsolete structures were intervened with an investment totaling Ch$ 9,933 million.

Focused on improving reliability, seven substations were intervened in 2013 in order to replace and standardize equipment included in the infrastructure of the high voltage system, and remote management of 18 substations and a total of 425 protective relays were enabled and equipment was bought for six more substations. Also with the purpose of improving the quality of service of the regional transmission system and the local distribution system, the protection system of 120 distribution centers was refurbished with an investment totaling Ch$ 10,365 million. As for regulatory, safety and environmental aspects focused on complying with governmental laws stipulated in land zoning plans, works for the implementation of underground networks and the assessment and street network were performed with an investment totaling Ch$ 6,806 million.

In order to improve the performance of the operations at the control center and the quality of service, Ch$ 1,249 million were invested in the renewal of communication chargers at power substations and the modernization of remote management of substations.

127

Peru

In 2013, Edelnor made investments totaling Ch$ 53,911 million in projects such as the extension of capacity of transformation substations (Ch$ 11,277 million), the extension and strengthen of networks and capacity extension of feeders (Ch$ 16,729 million), the assistance/electrification of new projects for the extension of electric networks in shanty towns (Ch$ 4,050 million), improvements in public lighting service and safety of facilities (Ch$ 12,393 million) and other investments focused on reducing commercial losses (Ch$ 1,026 million).

Major Encumbrances

Endesa Fortaleza executed a loan agreement with the International Finance Corporation (the “IFC”) to finance the construction of a power plant in Brazil. Endesa Fortaleza granted liens in favor of the IFC that include a mortgage and a pledge on assets which, as of December 31, 2013, were valued at Ch$ 141 billion. For further information, see Note 35 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Endesa Costanera’s supplier debt with Mitsubishi Corporation corresponds to the remaining payments on equipment purchased from the Mitsubishi. The value of the assets pledged to secure this debt was Ch$ 24 billion as of December 31, 2013. Additionally, Endesa Costanera has granted liens in favor of Credit Suisse in guarantee of a loan, which were valued at Ch$ 11 billion as of December 31, 2013.

Climate Change

In recent years, Chile and the region has seen growing development related to non-conventional renewable energy and strategies to combat climate change. This has led both the public and private sectors to adopt strategies to comply with the new environmental requirements, as evidenced by legal obligations at the local level, commitments assumed by countries at the international level, and the demanding requirements of the international markets.

Non-conventional renewable energies (“NCRE”) provide energy with minimal environmental impact and without CO₂ emissions. They are therefore considered as technological options that strengthen sustainable energy development as they supplement the production of traditional generators.

During 2013, Enersis and its subsidiaries held working meetings with different public, academic and private entities. This was done in order to learn and share experiences concerning the technical and regulatory developments in connection with NCRE, discuss climate change at both the local and international levels, analyze and establish strategic alliances, develop social and private projects and strengthen our leadership position in Chile.

The Canela wind farm (18 MW, in operation since late 2007), Canela II wind farm (60 MW, in operation since late 2009) and the Callahuanca hidroelectric power station (80.2 MW installed capacity, in operation since 1938) are the NCRE facilities owned by Enersis, which have contributed with clean and renewable energy to their respective national grids.Regarding the development of CO2 emission reduction mechanisms, during 2013, the projects in the Clean Development Mechanism (“CDM”) circuit were as follows:

Canela Wind Farm: On April 3, 2009, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (“UNFCCC”) approved the registration of the Canela project as a CDM project, which recognizes that this wind farm may verify and trade the greenhouse gas emissions that it will avoid during its useful life. During 2013, we continued the CDM verification procedure in order to meet the requirements of the UNFCCC. Since its registration under the UNFCCC as a CDM project, the installation has avoided approximately 127,171 tons of CO2 emissions, which can be traded in the carbon markets once they are verified.

On August 8, 2013, the Canela wind farm achieved registration under the Gold Standard (“GS”). This allows Enersis to apply for the GS verification process, which would provide GS Voluntary Emission Reductions (“VER”). This is one of the most recognized carbon standards in the market.

128

Canela II Wind Farm: On August 12, 2012, the UNFCCC approved the registration of the Canela II project as a CDM project, which recognizes that this wind farm may verify and trade the greenhouse gas emissions that it will avoid during its useful life. Since its registration under the UNFCCC as a CDM project, the Canela II wind farm has avoided approximately 121,485 tons of CO2 emissions, which can be traded in the carbon markets once they are verified.

Ventanilla Conversion from Single-cycle to Combined-cycle Power Generation Project:On June 20, 2011, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (“UNFCCC”) approved the registration of the project as a CDM, which recognizes that it may verify and trade the greenhouse gas emissions that it will be avoided during it useful life. During 2013, we continued the CDM verification procedure in order to meet the requirements of the UNFCCC.

On October 31, 2013 Ventanilla Conversion from Single-cycle to Combined-cycle Power Generation Project got the registration/verification under the VER + standard. A total amount of 2,496,494 tons of CO₂ were avoided during the period of October 19, 2006 through June 19, 2011 and as a result, Edegel S.A.A. got a total amount of 2,496,494 pre CDM VERs (2).

The Rehabilitation of the Callahuanca hydroelectric power station project: On January 4, 2008, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (“UNFCCC”) approved the registration of the project as a CDM, which recognizes that it may verify and trade the greenhouse gas emissions that it will be avoided during it useful life. During 2013, we continued the CDM verification procedure in order to meet the requirements of the UNFCCC.

On July 7, 2008 the Rehabilitation of the Callahuanca hydroelectric power station project got the registration/verification under the VER + standard. A total amount of 19 951 tons of CO₂ were avoided during the year 2007 and as a result, Edegel S.A.A. got a total amount of 19 951 pre CDM VERs (2).

129

Detail of CDM Projects Processed in 2013 by our Subsidiary, Endesa Chile

CDM project	Company/country	Position as of December 31, 2013	Emission factor (tons CO2e/MWh)	Approximate emissions avoided (tons CO2e/year)
Canela Wind Farm	Central Eólica Canela S.A. (Chile)	Registered with the Executive Authority of the UNFCCC since April 2009. CDM procedure implemented.	0.5713	27,251 (CER not yet verified) (1)
Canela Wind Farm	Central Eólica Canela S.A. (Chile)	Registered with the Gold Standard (Voluntary Standard) since August 2013.	0.5713	27,251 (VER not yet verified) (2)
Canela II Wind Farm	Central Eólica Canela S.A. (Chile)	Registered with the Executive Authority of the UNFCCC since August 2012. CDM procedure implemented.	0.6541	37,000 (CER not yet verified) (1)
Ventanilla Conversion from Single-cycle toCombined-cycle Power Generation Project	EDEGEL S.A.A. (Peru)	Registered with the Executive Authority of the UNFCCC since 2011. CDM procedure implemented.	0.454	407,296
Ventanilla Conversion from Single-cycle toCombined-cycle Power Generation Project	EDEGEL S.A.A. (Peru)	Registered with the VER + Standard (Voluntary Standard) since October 2013.	0.454	407,296
Rehabilitation of the Callahuanca hydroelectric power station	EDEGEL S.A.A. (Peru)	Registered with the Executive Authority of the UNFCCC since 2008. CDM procedure implemented.	0.449	18,189
Rehabilitation of the Callahuanca hydroelectric power station	EDEGEL S.A.A. (Peru)	Registered with the VER + Standard (Voluntary Standard) since July 2008.	0.449	18,189

(1) CER: Certified Emission Reductions.

(2) VER: Voluntary Emission Reductions.

In compliance with the group climate change guidelines, Enersis, together with Endesa Spain, has secured the certification of their carbon footprint for a second time. This means that the independent certification authority of the Spanish Association of Standards and Certification (Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación) (“AENOR”) has acknowledged the validity of the methodology. Acknowledgement by AENOR includes verification of the group’s “Endesa carbon footprint 2009-2010-2011” and “Endesa carbon footprint 2012” reports, which describe the work carried out by the group to calculate its carbon footprint and the results obtained for those years.

A carbon footprint is the sum of all greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) produced by a company in the course of its business activity. Enersis, as part of Endesa Spain’ policies, is striving to reduce its emissions due to its commitment to combat climate change. The first step involves measuring our carbon footprint.

As part of the process of calculating our carbon footprint, we plan to obtain a GHG inventory, including direct emissions associated with activities controlled by Enersis. We also plan to obtain a GHG inventory of indirect emissions, which are not generated through sources we control but are consequences of our activities.

The tools used to calculate emissions include audits and checks at all of our facilities. This enables Enersis to monitor its carbon footprint throughout the entire electricity supply chain. Calculating the carbon footprint also enables us to identify phases of our activities with the greatest potential to boost energy efficiency and reduce emissions.

130

Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments

None

Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

A. Operating Results.

General

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, included in Item 18 in this Report, and “Selected Financial Data”, included in Item 3 herein. Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the three years ended December 31, 2013 have been prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB.

1. Discussion of Main Factors Affecting Operating Results and Financial Condition of the Company

We are an electricity holding company that owns and operates power generation, transmission, and distribution companies in Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Peru. Most of our revenues, income and cash flows come from the operations of our subsidiaries, jointly-controlled companies and associates in these five countries.

Factors such as (i) hydrological conditions, (ii) fuel prices, (iii) regulatory developments, (iv) exceptional actions adopted by governmental authorities and (v) changes to the economic conditions in countries in which we operate may materially affect our financial results. In addition, our results from operations and financial condition are affected by variations in the exchange rates between the Chilean peso and the currencies of the other four countries in which we operate. These exchange variations may materially impact in the consolidation of the results of our companies outside Chile. Lastly, we have certain critical accounting policies that affect our consolidated operating results.

Our diversification strategy aims to balance the impact of significant changes in one country with opposing changes in other countries, or within generation and distribution, leading to reduced or no significant impact on consolidated figures. The impact of these factors on us, for the years covered by this Report, is discussed below.

Until December 31, 2012, jointly-controlled companies were consolidated using the proportionate consolidation method. Commencing January 1, 2013, we began recording these jointly controlled companies using the equity method, as required by IFRS 11, “Joint Arrangements”. This change affected our accounting for Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén S.A., Inversiones GasAtacama Holding Ltda., Distribuidora Eléctrica de Cundinamarca S.A. and their subsidiaries, and Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. Our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were restated to give retrospective effect to the application of IFRS 11. These changes do not have any effect on equity or net income, in both cases, attributable to the shareholders of Enersis. Our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are presented in the form in which they were originally prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB, and do not reflect the application of IFRS 11. For detailed information, refer to Note 2.2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements and Annex VII.

Since April 1, 2013, we consolidate certain companies contributed by Endesa Spain to us in connection with our capital increase, which affected the comparison of results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. See “Item 10. Additional Information —B. Memorandum and Articles of Association — Capitalization”.

131

a. Generation Business

A substantial part of our generation capacity depends on hydrological conditions prevailing in the countries in which we operate, although only extreme hydrological conditions materially affect our operating results and financial condition. In terms of installed capacity as of December 31, 2013 (8,677 MW), 2012 (8,666 MW) and 2011 (8,675 MW), 55%, 57% and 58%, respectively, was hydroelectric.

Hydroelectric generation was 30,869 GWh in 2013, 34,448 GWh in 2012 and 33,676 GWh in 2011. Our 2013 generation was lower than in previous years due to increasingly challenging hydrological conditions in Chile, characterized by low rainfalls and a poor snowmelt. These drought conditions have prevailed since 2010. Because of this lack of water, hydroelectric generation in Chile had to be substituted with thermal generation and energy purchases on the spot market, both of which resulted in higher costs, in order to meet our obligations under contracts with both regulated and unregulated customers.

Our thermal generators burn LNG, coal or diesel. We can offset the effect of poor hydrological conditions (reservoir levels, rain and snow) with thermal generation and electricity purchases. Our thermal installed capacity and the ability to purchase electricity from other generators allow us to increase thermal generation and/or purchase electricity from competitors to meet our commitments. In addition, given industry structure and the percentage of hydroelectric generation capacity in the countries in which we operate, when hydrological conditions are poor, electricity prices generally increase. Under certain circumstances, poor hydrological conditions can potentially lead to higher revenues and higher operating income.

Operating costs in connection with generation and energy purchases are higher than the variable cost of hydroelectric generation in normal hydrological conditions. The cost of thermal generation does not depend on hydrology but instead on global commodity prices for coal, LNG and diesel. However, the cost of electricity purchases in the spot market does depend on hydrology and commodity prices.

The impact of low hydrology on our operating results depends on the resulting effects on in electricity prices in the market, the severity of the impact of hydrological conditions on our hydroelectric generation, our cost of thermal generation, and the need for energy purchases. The effect of low hydrology on market prices may increase or decrease our operating margin, depending on the conditions of all relevant market factors. In recent years, additional thermal capacity has more than offset the lower hydrology, resulting in increased operating margins.

For additional information on the effects of hydrological conditions on our operating results, see “Item 3. Key Information — D. Risk Factors — Since our generation business depends heavily on hydrological conditions, drought conditions may affect our profitability”.

b. Distribution Business

Our electricity distribution business is conducted in Chile through Chilectra, in Argentina through Edesur, in Brazil through Ampla and Coelce, in Colombia through Codensa, and in Peru through Edelnor. For the year ended December 31, 2013, electricity sales increased by 4% compared to 2012, totaling 75,859 GWh. Currently these six distributors serve important South American cities, providing electricity to over 14 million customers. These companies face growing electricity demand, because of organic growth in demand, which obliges them to continually invest in their facilities.

Among the key factors that impact on financial results are regulations. This is especially true when the actions adopted by government authorities define or intervene with directly regulated customer tariffs, or affect the price at which distributors can buy their energy. In addition, we are focusing on reducing the losses, especially those due to illegally tapped energy, and improving our collectibility indexes in order to improve our efficiency. The ability to buy electricity relies highly on generation availiability and government regulation. Currently, Chilectra is the technical operator of Edesur, Edelnor, Ampla and Coelce, but does not receive operator fees.

132

c. Selective Regulatory Developments

The regulatory framework governing our businesses in the five countries in which we operate has a material effect on our results of operations. In particular, regulators set (i) energy prices in the generation business, taking into consideration factors such as fuel costs, reservoir levels, exchange rates, future investments in installed capacity and demand growth, and (ii) distribution tariffs taking into account the costs of energy purchases paid by distribution companies (which distribution companies pass on to their customers) and the “Value Added from Distribution”, or VAD, all of which are intended to reflect investment and operating costs incurred by distribution and generation companies and to allow our companies to obtain a regulated return on their investments. The earnings of our electricity subsidiaries are determined to a large degree by government regulators, mainly through the tariff setting process.

Over the next few years, ordinary tariff reviews will continue in each country. For example, during 2014 the tariffs for Codensa in Colombia and Ampla in Brazil will be reviewed, as well as tariffs in the sub-transmission business in Chile. Coelce’s will be reviewed in 2015, Chilectra’s in 2016 and Edelnor’s in 2017. Each of these reviews presents its own particularities and challenges. In geographic regions such as South America, tariff reviews seek to capture economies of scale based on economic growth.

For additional information relating to the regulatory frameworks in the countries where we operate, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — Electricity Industry Regulatory Framework”.

In Argentina, on March 26, 2013, the Secretariat for Energy published Resolution 95/2013, which set forth a non-recurring regulated remuneration schedule for power generation activity effective retroactively as of February 2013. On May 7, 2013, the Secretariat of Energy approved Resolution 250/2013, which defined the residual value of the funds owed to Edesur, thereby allowing the payment of debts that Edesur incurred under the PUREE efficiency program, among others. For additional information relating to the regulatory frameworks in the countries where we operate, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — Electricity Industry Regulatory Framework —Argentina— Industry Overview— Industry Structure.”

d. Economic Conditions

Macroeconomic conditions, such as changes in employment levels, gross domestic product and inflation or deflation in the countries in which we operate may have a significant effect on our operating results. When a country experiences sustained economic growth, consumption of electricity by industrial and individual consumers increases. Other macroeconomic factors, such as the variation of a local currency against the U.S. dollar, may impact our operating results, as well as assets and liabilities, depending on the percentage denominated in U.S. dollars. For example, a devaluation of local currencies against the U.S. dollar increases the cost of capital expenditure plans. For additional information, see “ Item 3. Key Information — D. Risk Factors — Foreign exchange risks may adversely affect our results and the U.S. dollar value of dividends payable to ADS holders” and “— South American economic fluctuations are likely to affect our results from operations and financial condition, as well as the value of our securities”.

133

Economic Growth and Electricity Demand

Overall electricity demand increased during 2013, primarily due to favorable economic conditions in most of the countries in which we operate. The GDP and electricity demand growth rate for the years 2013, 2012 and 2011 are included in the following table:

	2013 (estimated)				2012				2011
	GDP Growth		Electricity Demand Growth		GDP Growth		Electricity Demand Growth		GDP Growth		Electricity Demand Growth
	(in %)
Chile (1)		4.4		3.5		5.6		5.2		5.8		6.0
Argentina		3.5		3.2		1.9		4.2		8.9		5.5
Brazil		2.5		2.5		0.9		4.5		2.7		3.4
Colombia		3.7		2.6		4.0		3.8		6.6		1.7
Peru		5.4		5.9		6.3		5.9		6.9		7.5

Sources: GDP growth data was obtained from the World Economic Outlook (October 2013) of the International Monetary Fund and corresponds to real growth for 2012 and 2011, and an estimate for 2013. Electricity demand growth data was obtained from sales reported by the CDEC to the CNE for Chile, from electricity demand reported by CAMMESA for Argentina, from total demand of the NIS reported by the XM for Colombia, from energy charges reported by the ONS for Brazil and from monthly reports of tariffs and the electricity market reported by the Osinergmin for Peru.

(1) Electricity demand growth includes growth in the SIC and the SING.

Local Currency Exchange Rate

Variations in the parity of the U.S. dollar and the local currency in each of the countries in which we have operations may have an impact on our operating results and overall financial position. The impact will depend on the level at which tariffs are pegged to the U.S. dollar, U.S. dollar-denominated assets and liabilities and also the translation of financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries for consolidation purposes to the presentation currency, which is the Chilean peso.

As of December 31, 2013, we had total consolidated indebtedness of the equivalent of Ch$ 3,697 billion (net of currency hedging instruments), of which 35.4% was denominated in U.S. dollars, 33.3% in Colombian pesos, 14.9% in Brazilian reais, 9.1% in Chilean UF (which is inflation-indexed), 6.0% in soles and 1.3% in Argentine pesos.

The following table sets forth the closing and average local currencies per U.S. dollar exchange rates for the periods indicated.

								��
	Local Currency U.S. Dollar Exchange Rates
	2013				2012				2011
	Average		Year End		Average		Year End		Average		Year End
Chile (Chilean pesos per U.S. dollar)		495.18		524.61		486.59		479.96		483.57		519.20
Argentina (Argentine pesos per U.S. dollar)		5.48		6.52		4.55		4.92		4.13		4.30
Brazil (reais per U.S. dollar)		2.16		2.34		1.95		2.04		1.67		1.88
Colombia (Colombian pesos per U.S. dollar)		1,870		1,927		1,798		1,768		1,847		1,943
Peru (soles per U.S. dollar)		2.70		2.80		2.64		2.55		2.75		2.70

Sources: Central banks of each country.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, our revenues were Ch$ 6,264.4 billion or US$ 12.7 billion, of which 29.8 % was generated in Brazil, 27.8% in Chile, 20.9 % in Colombia, 11.2% by Argentina and 10.3% in Peru.

134

e. Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are defined as those that reflect significant judgments and uncertainties which would potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our critical accounting policies are limited to those described below with reference to the preparation of our financial statements under IFRS.

For further detail of the accounting policies and the methods used in the preparation of the financial statements, see Notes 2 and 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

During the period, and principally at period end, we evaluate whether there is any indication that an asset has been impaired. Should any such indication exist, we estimate the recoverable amount of that asset to determine, where appropriate, the amount of impairment. In the case of identifiable assets that do not generate cash flows independently, we estimate the recoverability of the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs, which is understood to be the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates independent cash inflows.

Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, in the case of cash generating units to which goodwill or intangible assets with an indefinite useful life have been allocated, a recoverability analysis is performed routinely at each period end.

The recoverable amount is the greater between the fair value less the cost needed to sell and the value in use, which is defined as the present value of the estimated future cash flows. In order to calculate the recoverable value of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets, we use value in use criteria in nearly all cases.

To estimate the value in use, we prepare future pre tax cash flow projections based on the most recent budgets available. These budgets incorporate management’s best estimates of cash generating units’ revenues and costs using sector projections, past experience and future expectations.

In general, these projections cover the next ten years, estimating cash flows for subsequent years by applying reasonable growth rates, between 2.2% and 9.0%, which in no case are increasing nor exceed the average long-term growth rates for the particular sector and country.

These cash flows are discounted at a given pre-tax rate in order to calculate their present value. This rate reflects the cost of capital of the business and the geographical area in which the business is conducted. The discount rate is calculated taking into account the current time value of money and the risk premiums generally used by market participants for the specific business activity and the country involved.

The pre tax nominal discount rates applied in 2013, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

		Year ended December 31,
		2013				2012				2011
Country	Currency	Minimum		Maximum		Minimum		Maximum		Minimum		Maximum
		(in %)
Chile	Chilean peso		7.8		16.3		8.0		14.6		8.0		10.1
Argentina	Argentine peso		39.2		44.4		26.0		29.0		23.0		26.0
Brazil	Brazilian real		9.0		18.8		9.5		18.0		9.5		11.6
Colombia	Colombian peso		8.5		14.2		8.4		14.5		8.9		10.9
Peru	Nuevo sol		7.3		13.9		7.6		12.5		7.3		9.3

135

If the recoverable amount is less than the net carrying amount of the asset, the corresponding provision for impairment loss is recorded for the difference, and charged to “Reversal of impairment loss (impairment loss) recognized in profit or loss” in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

Impairment losses recognized for an asset in prior periods are reversed when its estimated recoverable amount changes, increasing the asset’s value with a credit to earnings, limited to the asset’s carrying amount if no adjustment had occurred. In the case of goodwill, adjustments that would have been made are not reversible.

Litigation and Contingencies

We are currently involved in certain legal and tax proceedings. As discussed in Note 23 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, we have estimated the probable outflows of resources for resolving these claims to be Ch$ 221.0 billion. We have reached this estimate after consulting our legal and tax advisors who are carrying out our defense in these matters and an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies.

Hedge Revenues Directly Linked to the U.S. Dollar

We have established a policy to hedge the portion of our revenues directly linked to the U.S. dollar by obtaining financing in this currency. Exchange differences related to this debt, as they are cash flow hedge transactions, are charged net of taxes to an equity reserve account and recorded as income during the period in which the hedged cash flows are realized. This term has been estimated at ten years.

This policy reflects a detailed analysis of our future U.S. dollar revenue streams. Such analysis may change in the future due to new electricity regulations limiting the amount of revenues tied to the U.S. dollar.

Pension and Post-Employment Benefits Liabilities

We have various defined benefits plans for our employees. These plans pay benefits to employees at retirement and use formulas based on years of service and the compensation of the participants. We also offer certain additional benefits for some retired employees in particular.

The liabilities shown for the pensions and post-employment benefits reflect our best estimate of the future cost of meeting our obligations under these plans. The accounting applied to these defined benefit plans involves actuarial calculations which contain key assumptions that include employee turnover, life expectancy and retirement ages, discount rates, the future level of compensation and benefits, the claims rate under medical plans and future medical costs. These assumptions change as economic and market conditions vary and any change in any of these assumptions could have a material effect on the reported results from operations.

The effect of an increase of one percentage point in the discount rate used to determine the present value of the post-employment defined benefits would decrease the liability by Ch$ 42.0 billion in 2013, Ch$ 59.0 billion in 2012 and Ch$ 54.0 billion in 2011 and the effect of a decrease of one percentage point in the rate used to determine the present value of the post-employment defined benefits would increase the liability by Ch$ 49.3 billion in 2013, Ch$ 70.8 billion in 2012 and Ch$ 64.4 billion in 2011.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Please see Note 2.2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding recent accounting pronouncements.

Argentina

Our Argentine operations do not affect Enersis’ consolidated liquidity. As a result of the Argentine economic crisis in the early 2000s and the significant governmental intervention in the electricity sector in 2002, we have not received dividends from our Argentine subsidiaries Endesa Costanera, Edesur and El Chocón, since 2000, 2009 and 2012, respectively. In 2011, we recorded a

136

Ch$ 5.4 billion goodwill impairment charge for Endesa Costanera and a Ch$ 115.4 billion infrastructure and goodwill impairment charge for Edesur. Additional economic deterioration of Argentina, or of our subsidiaries that operate in that country, is not expected to have any material effect on our financial and operating results.

Our Argentine liquid assets were Ch$ 25.0 billion as of December 2013, which represents 1.6% of Enersis’ total liquid assets. Of the total Argentine liquid assets, 90.7% is denominated in local currency, and the remaining 9.3% is denominated in U.S. dollars. Our Argentine debt was Ch$ 205.1 billion as of December 2013, representing 5.5% of Enersis’s total debt. Of the total Argentine debt, 22.9% is denominated in local currency, and the remaining 77.1% is denominated in U.S. dollars. The currency translation effect of converting the statement of comprehensive income from the Argentine peso to the Chilean peso led to a 15.4% decrease in the amount of Chilean pesos in 2013 compared to 2012. A default by any of our Argentine subsidiaries on their indebtedness would not affect Endesa Chile or Enersis. For more information, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects. — B. Liquidity & Capital Resources”.

The Argentine government has avoided increasing electricity tariffs to end customers, and seasonal prices have remained fixed in Argentine pesos. On the other hand, a generation company’s tariffs are also regulated based on defined fixed and variable remuneration. Due to rate controls, revenues of electric utility companies do not always cover their operating costs. Argentine authorities have created a new mechanism to improve the financial situation of these companies, in recognition that their performance is directly related to the regulatory framework. For more detail, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — Electricity Industry Regulatory Framework.— Argentina”.

2. Results of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Revenues

Generation and Transmission Business

The following table sets forth the electricity sales of our subsidiaries and the corresponding changes for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

	Electricity sales during the year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		Change		Change
	(in GWh)						(in %)
Endesa and subsidiaries (Chile) (1)		20,406		20,878		(472)		(2.3)
Endesa Costanera (Argentina)		8,962		8,655		307		3.6
El Chocón (Argentina)		3,392		3,197		195		6.1
Dock Sud (Argentina)		4,195		—		4,195		n.a.
Cachoeira Dourada (Brazil)		3,564		4,344		(780)		(18.0)
Endesa Fortaleza (Brazil)		3,262		2,947		315		10.7
Emgesa (Colombia)		16,090		16,304		(214)		(1.3)
Edegel (Peru)		8,903		9,587		(684)		(7.1)
EEPSA (Peru)		594		—		594		n.a.
Total		69,369		65,912		3,457		5.2

(1) Restated in accordance with IFRS 11.

Distribution Business

Distribution revenues are mainly derived from the resale of electricity purchased from generators. Revenues associated with distribution include the recovery of the cost of electricity purchased and the resulting revenue from the VAD, which is associated with the recovery of costs and the return on the investment with respect to the distribution assets, plus the physical energy losses permitted by the regulator. Other revenues derived from our distribution services consists of charges for new connections and the maintenance and rental of meters, among others.

137

The following table sets forth the electricity sales of our subsidiaries, by country, and their corresponding variations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

	Electricity sales during the year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		Change		Change
	(in GWh)				(in %)
Chilectra (Chile)		15,152		14,445		707		4.9
Edesur (Argentina)		18,137		17,738		399		2.3
Ampla (Brazil)		11,049		10,816		233		2.2
Coelce (Brazil)		10,718		9,878		840		8.5
Codensa (Colombia) (1)		13,342		12,972		370		2.9
Edelnor (Peru)		7,045		6,863		182		2.7
Total		75,443		72,712		2,731		3.8

(1) Restated in accordance with IFRS 11.

138

Revenues by Business Segment

The table below presents our revenues by business segment for 2013 and 2012.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		Change		Change
	(in millions of Ch$)						(in %)
Generation and Transmission Business
Endesa and subsidiaries (Chile) (1)		955,702		1,104,776		(149,074)		(13.5)
Endesa Costanera (Argentina)		94,888		295,140		(200,252)		(67.8)
El Chocón (Argentina)		36,687		49,193		(12,506)		(25.4)
Dock Sud (Argentina)		41,186		—		41,186		n.a.
Cemsa (Argentina)		1,591		—		1,591		n.a.
Cachoeira Dourada (Brazil)		117,445		155,195		(37,750)		(24.3)
Endesa Fortaleza (Brazil)		168,871		139,186		29,685		21.3
CIEN (Brazil)		67,689		72,523		(4,834)		(6.7)
Emgesa (Colombia)		639,503		580,125		59,378		10.2
Edegel (Peru)		283,806		282,124		1,682		0.6
EEPSA (Peru)		33,752		—		33,752		n.a.
Total		2,441,120		2,678,262		(237,142)		(8.9)
Distribution Business
Chilectra and subsidiaries (Chile)		975,024		984,738		(9,714)		(1.0)
Edesur (Argentina)		528,653		321,242		207,411		64.6
Ampla (Brazil)		945,131		1,074,237		(129,106)		(12.0)
Coelce (Brazil)		688,981		806,428		(117,447)		(14.6)
Codensa (Colombia) (1)		852,780		851,622		1,158		0.1
Edelnor (Peru)		413,911		385,014		28,897		7.5
Total		4,404,480		4,423,281		(18,801)		(0.4)
Less: consolidation adjustments and non-core activities		(581,154)		(605,590)		24,436		(4.0)
Total		6,264,446		6,495,953		(231,507)		(3.6)

(1) Restated in accordance with IFRS 11.

Generation and Transmission Business: Revenues

Lower revenues in Chile of Ch$ 149.1 billion during 2013 were mostly due to a 11.5% reduction in average energy sales prices, mostly explained by fewer contracts indexed to the marginal cost, coupled with a 2.3% reduction of physical energy sales, mainly to unregulated customers. The lower revenues are explained by Ch$ 134.7 billion sales decrease and two non recurring sources of gains that we recorded in 2012. In March 2012, extraordinary income of Ch$ 29.2 billion was due to an agreement reached between Endesa Chile and CMPC, a pulp and paper company. In December 2012, extraordinary additional income of Ch$ 55.1 billion was recorded due to the agreed compensation with an insurance company for loss of profits in connection with Bocamina as a result of earthquake damage on February 27, 2010. All these revenues reductions were partially offset by Ch$ 25.2 billion higher gas sale revenues and Ch$ 23.8 billion higher other sale revenues.

Revenues from operations in Argentina decreased 49.4% or Ch$ 170 billion. Endesa Costanera recorded a Ch$ 207 billion lower revenue for one-time adjustment due to Argentine Resolution 95. This amount was related to fuel value and was deducted from both revenues and operating costs, with no impact on operating income. El Chocón recorded a 25.4% reduction in operating revenues, primarily related to the exchange rate conversion effect, a decline in average sales price, and lower hydrology. The lower revenues were partially offset by Ch$ 33.1 billion in revenues related to Endesa Costanera’s combined cycle availability contract executed with the Secretariat of Energy. Revenues from Dock Sud and Cemsa added Ch$ 41.2 billion and Ch$ 1.6 billion to Enersis’ consolidated income statement. Dock Sud and Cemsa have been consolidated by Enersis only since April 2013, following the capital increase, The

139

“currency translation effect” is the net effect obtained when translating the results from the local currency of each country to pesos. The currency translation effect of converting the statement of comprehensive income from the Argentine peso to the Chilean peso in Argentina led to a 15.4% decrease in 2013, when compared to 2012.

In Brazil, revenues from Cachoeira Dourada decreased 24.3% in 2013, as a result of a 780.1 GWh decrease in electricity sales, to 3,564.4 GWh, and 7.8% lower average sales prices in terms of Chilean pesos. This decrease in sales was primarily due to lower energy generation, which in turn was attributable to poor hydrological conditions. Revenues from Endesa Fortaleza increased 21.3% in 2013, due to 9.6% higher average sales prices in terms of Chilean pesos and 315.5 GWh greater electricity sales, that was possible mainly due to the higher thermal generation. Revenues for CIEN decreased 6.7% in 2013 due to the effect of the exchange from Brazilian reais to Chilean pesos following the devaluation of the Brazilian reais. The effect of translating the statement of comprehensive income from Brazilian reais to Chilean pesos in both periods resulted in a 7.8% reduction in Chilean peso terms in 2013 compared to 2012.

In Colombia, revenues from Emgesa increased Ch$ 59.4 billion, or 10.2%, in 2013, mainly due to a 11.7 % rise in the average energy sales price in terms of Chilean pesos, offsetting a 1.3% decline in physical sales. The effect of translating the statement of comprehensive income from Colombian pesos to Chilean pesos in both periods resulted in a 2.0% decline in Chilean peso terms in 2013 when compared to 2012.

Revenues from Edegel, in Peru, increased Ch$ 1.7 billion, or 0.6%, in 2013, primarily due to the compensation claim recognition from the TG-7 turbine damage at the Santa Rosa plant of Ch$ 20.0 billion. Revenues from EEPSA added Ch$ 33.8 billion to the consolidated income statement. EEPSA has been consolidated by Enersis only since April 2013, following the capital increase. The currency translation effect of converting the statement of comprehensive income from soles to the peso for both periods resulted in a 0.5% decrease in 2013, when compared to 2012.

Distribution Business: Revenues

In Chile, revenues of our subsidiary Chilectra declined Ch$ 9.7 billion, or 1.0%, in 2013, as a consequence of a 6.1% reduction in the average energy sales price due to a 4.5% tariff decrease in 2013 with retroactive application to November 2012, partly offset by 707 GWh higher electricity sales, for a total of 15,152 GWh, particularly due to greater residential demand. In addition, other operating income increased Ch$ 7.8 billion, primarily for energy transmission, higher indemnity received from third parties, and other services. Customers increased by 34,552, reaching 1.7 million. Electricity demand grew by 4.7% in our concession area during the period, explained by increased consumption during the winter due to lower temperatures and higher commercial activity.

In Argentina, revenues from Edesur increased by Ch$ 207.4 billion or 64.6% in 2013, mainly due to the application of Resolution 250/13. This resolution, in addition to Energy Secretariat Note 6852/13, that recognized costs not transferred to tariffs from 2007 through September 2013 in connection with the application of MMC, the cost monitoring mechanism, permitted the non-recurring recognition of a Ch$ 250.5 billion increase in revenues in 2013. This effect was partially offset by a Ch$ 40.8 billion reduction in sales revenues, due to the recognition of Ch$ 21.6 billion in fines for service quality and the negative effect (15.4% less) of the exchanging Argentine pesos to Chilean pesos. Electricity sales reached 18,137 GWh, an increase of 2.2% over 2012, owing to the demand peaks registered during the end of the year linked to the high temperatures that prevailed in Buenos Aires. The number of customers increased by 55,338, reaching more than 2.4 million customers.

In Brazil, revenues from Ampla decreased Ch$ 129.1 billion, or 12.0%, in 2013. This reduction is associated with the Extraordinary Tariff Adjustment (RTE) under Law 12,783/13, which reduced tariffs in the country by 20% on average. This effect was partially offset by the Annual Tariff Adjustment, which rates increased by 12.1 % on average. Ampla increased new customers by 89,000, reaching more than 2.8 million customers. Electricity demand grew by 1.5% in our concession area during the period, explained by higher temperatures compared to 2012, which triggered a more intensive use of air conditioning units of residential and commercial customers.

140

Revenues from Coelce fell by Ch$ 117.5 billion, or 14.6 %, in 2013. This reduction is associated with the Extraordinary Tariff Adjustment (RTE) under Law 12,783/13, which reduced tariffs in the country by 20% on average and the return of an extraordinary income between April 2011 and March 2012, because of the non-application of the third tariff revision cycle of Coelce in April 2011. The refund to final customer will be through tariff adjustments and 2014. These effects were partially offset by the Annual Tariff Adjustment, which increased rates by 3.9% on average. Physical sales increased by 8.5%, reaching 10,718 GWh, explained by the more intensive use of pumping devices in rural areas, linked to the drought that affected the country during the period. The company added 162,035 new customers, reaching a total of more than 3.5 million customers.

In Colombia, revenues of our subsidiary Codensa remained flat, increasing by 0.1% in 2013, mainly due to the exchange rate effect that offset the increase of revenues due to a 2.9% increase in physical sales. Electricity sales reached 13,342 GWh to and the number of customers increased by 99,071, to more than 2.6 million customers. Electricity demand remained stable, growing 1.0% in our concession area during the period.

In Peru, revenues of Edelnor increased by 7.5% in 2013, mainly due to 2.7% higher physical sales and revenues linked to other services. The number of customers grew by 51,577, to more than 1.2 million, and electricity sales reached 7,044.6 GWh. Electricity demand grew by 2.7% in our concession area during the period. The rest of the country showed a higher demand, primarily linked to the mining sector, based in central and northern Peru.

Operating Costs

Operating costs consist primarily of electricity purchases from third parties, fuel purchases, depreciation, amortization and impairment losses, maintenance costs, tolls paid to transmission companies, and employee salaries. Operating costs also include administrative and selling expenses. The following table shows the breakdown of our operating costs, as a percentage of total operating costs, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Our cost structure remained substantially the same in 2013 and 2012.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013			2012
Operating Costs as a Percentage of Total Operating Costs		(in %)
Electricity purchases		40.2			36.8
Fuel purchases		8.5			15.2
Other variable cost		10.8			12.1
Other fixed costs		11.5			9.8
Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses		11.3			9.5
Transmission tolls		8.8			9.4
Staff benefit costs		8.9			7.2
Total		100	��		100

141

The table below sets forth the breakdown of operating costs by company for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		Change		Change
	(in millions of Ch$)						(in %)
Generation and Transmission Business
Endesa and subsidiaries (Chile) (1)		690,421		939,246		(248,825)		(26.5)
Endesa Costanera (Argentina)		73,744		317,228		(243,484)		(76.8)
El Chocón (Argentina)		22,451		24,328		(1,877)		(7.7)
Dock Sud (Argentina)		43,722		—		43,722		n.a.
Cemsa (Argentina)		2,032		—		2,032		n.a.
Cachoeira Dourada (Brazil)		35,637		50,071		(14,434)		(28.8)
Endesa Fortaleza (Brazil)		119,832		97,314		22,518		23.1
CIEN (Brazil)		35,159		35,583		(424)		(1.2)
Emgesa (Colombia)		275,510		242,474		33,036		13.6
Edegel (Peru)		171,614		181,226		(9,612)		(5.3)
EEPSA (Peru)		26,503		—		26,503		n.a.
Total		1,496,625		1,887,470		(390,845)		(20.7)
Distribution Business
Chilectra and subsidiaries (Chile)		836,143		851,363		(15,220)		(1.8)
Edesur (Argentina)		406,655		375,345		31,310		8.3
Ampla (Brazil)		772,932		900,521		(127,589)		(14.2)
Coelce (Brazil)		627,564		675,422		(47,858)		(7.1)
Codensa (Colombia)(1)		611,892		612,851		(959)		(0.2)
Edelnor (Peru)		329,806		314,945		14,861		4.7
Total		3,584,992		3,730,447		(145,455)		(3.9)
Less: consolidation adjustments and non-core activities		(558,309)		(592,727)		34,418		(5.8)
Total		4,523,308		5,025,190		(501,882)		(10.0)

(1) Restated in accordance with IFRS 11.

Generation and Transmission Business: Operating Costs

In Chile, Endesa Chile’s operating costs decreased by Ch$ 248.8 billion, or 26.5%, in 2013, primarily because of lower fuel costs of Ch$ 173.7 billion, lower energy purchase costs of Ch$ 94.9 billion as a result of reduced energy sales needs, lower average price of purchased energy in the spot market, reduced transportation expenses of Ch$ 3.8 billion, and a reduction in depreciation and impairment losses of Ch$ 3.1 billion. These cost reductions were partly offset by higher other variable procurements and services of Ch$ 13.4 billion, higher personnel expenses of Ch$ 9.9 billion and higher other fixed costs of Ch$ 8.3 billion.

In Argentina, Endesa Costanera’s operating costs decreased by Ch$ 243.5 billion, or 76.8%, in 2013, mainly due to the reclassification of revenues and costs resulting from the application of Resolution 95/13, which associates revenues and costs to fuel costs with a one-time adjustment of Ch$ 207 billion as of December 31, 2013, also recorded as operating revenues, with no effect on operating income. In addition, a Ch$ 3.0 billion transportation cost decrease, a Ch$ 1.5 billion decrease in other fixed expenses and reduced charges for depreciation and impairment of Ch$ 1.5 billion were registered. All of these were partly offset by higher personnel expenses of Ch$ 3.3 billion and higher energy purchases of Ch$ 3.1 billion. Operating costs of El Chocón decreased 7.7% due to a Ch$ 1.9 billion decrease in procurement and services costs, and reduced energy purchases of Ch$ 0.9 billion. This was partially offset by higher transportation expenses of Ch$ 1.0 billion. Operating costs of Dock Sud and Cemsa contributed to consolidated operating costs Ch$ 43.7 billion and Ch$ 2.0 billion, respectively. Both companies have been consolidated by Enersis since April 2013, following the capital increase.

142

In Brazil, Cachoeira Dourada’s operating costs declined 28.8%, or Ch$ 14.4 billion, to Ch$ 35.6 billion in 2013, mainly due to reductions in transportation expenses of Ch$ 5.6 billion, other variable procurement and service costs of Ch$ 4.7 billion and lower energy purchases of Ch$ 4.5 billion. Endesa Fortaleza’s operating costs increased by Ch$ 22.5 billion in 2013, mainly due to greater fuel consumption of Ch$19.8 billion, increased energy purchases and transportation expenses of Ch$ 4.3 billion, and higher other variable costs of Ch$ 1 billion. These increases were partially offset by reduced fixed costs of Ch$ 2.4 billion. CIEN’s operating costs decreased 1.2%, reaching Ch$ 35.2 billion, in 2013. This is mainly explained by reduced sales revenues of Ch$ 4.8 billion and reduced operating expenses of Ch$ 424 million. Both variations are due to the effect of the exchange from Brazilian reais to Chilean pesos following the devaluation of the reais.

In Colombia, Emgesa’s operating costs increased Ch$ 33.0 billion, or 13.6%, in 2013. This was explained by a Ch$ 38.5 billion increase in energy purchases due to a higher purchase price in the spot market related to the worsening of hydrological conditions in the first quarter of 2013, coupled with higher physical energy purchases due to the lower hydro generation. Also, transportation expenses increased by Ch$ 2.4 billion and personnel expenses increased by Ch$ 1.5 billion. These increases were partially offset by reductions of Ch$ 6.2 billion in variable procurement expenses, Ch$ 1.4 billion in fuel costs, Ch$ 0.9 billion in other fixed expenses and Ch$ 0.9 billion in depreciation and impairment charges.

In Peru, Edegel’s operating costs decreased by Ch$ 9.6 billion, or 5.3%, in 2013 because of the 684 GWh decrease in physical sales that were reflected in reduced energy purchases of Ch$ 18.7 billion and reduced fuel consumption of Ch$ 3.3 billion. These reductions were partially compensated by higher depreciation and impairment costs of Ch$ 6.2 billion and higher variable procurements and service costs of Ch$5.8 billion. Energy generation fell by 2.1% to 8,391.1 GWh in 2013, partially related to the TG-7 turbine damage at the Santa Rosa plant. Operating costs of EEPSA contributed to the consolidated operating costs Ch$ 26.5 billion. EEPSA has been consolidated by Enersis only since April 2013, following the capital increase.

Distribution Business: Operating Costs

Chilectra’s operating costs decreased Ch$ 15.2 billion, or 1.8%, in 2013. This is due to Ch$ 14.4 billion reduced energy purchase expenses, Ch$ 1.7 billion lower transportation expenses, and lower other fixed costs of Ch$ 2.0 billion. This was offset by Ch$ 1.5 billion higher depreciation and impairment costs, Ch$ 0.9 billion higher personnel expenses, and Ch$ 0.6 billion higher other expenses. Energy losses declined by 0.1 percentage points to 5.3% in 2013.

Edesur’s operating costs increased Ch$ 31.3 billion, or 8.3%, in 2013, due to an increase in personnel expenses of Ch$ 19.2 billion and an Ch$ 18.6 billion increase in other fixed expenses for supplies and contracted services, which have had general price increases. These were partially offset by Ch$ 6.2 billion in lower energy purchase costs. Energy losses rose by 0.2 percentage points to 10.8%.

In Brazil, Ampla’s operating costs decreased by Ch$ 127.6 billion, or 14.2%, in 2013. This is mainly due to Ch$ 99.7 billion lower other variable procurement costs and Ch$ 43.7 billion in reduced transportation costs. This was offset by Ch$ 9.5 billion higher energy purchase costs, explained by the drought affecting Brazil, together with the application of MP579 during 2013, as distributors were more exposed to the spot market. These extra costs could not be immediately compensated through a regulatory mechanism and are expected to be recovered in the future, according to Brazilian regulation. Depreciation and impairment cost increased by Ch$ 7.3 billion, while personnel expenses declined by Ch$ 2.6 billion. Energy losses increased by 0.2 percentage points from 19.6% to 19.8%. Coelce’s operating costs decreased by Ch$ 47.9 billion, or 7.1%, in 2013. This was explained by a Ch$ 53.4 billion reduction in procurement and service costs, including a Ch$ 20.5 billion reduction in transportation costs and a Ch$ 8.2 billion increase in energy purchase costs, explained by the drought and the application of MP579. Depreciation and impairment cost increased by Ch$ 13.3 billion, fixed costs declined by Ch$ 4.4 billion, and personnel expenses decreased by Ch$ 3.3 billion. Energy losses declined by 0.1 percentage points to 12.5%.

143

Codensa’s operating costs decreased 0.2%, in 2013. Energy losses, dropped significantly 0.3 percentage points to 7.0%, due to efforts undertaken by the company to mitigate this effect.

Edelnor’s operating costs increased by Ch$ 14.9 billion, or 4.7%, in 2013, mainly due to a Ch$13.4 billion increase in energy purchase costs and a Ch$ 1.1 billion increase in other variable costs. There were also higher personnel expenses of Ch$ 1.5 billion and lower fixed costs of Ch$ 1.1 billion. Energy losses were lower by 0.2 percentage points to 8.0% in 2013.

Operating Income

The following table summarizes operating income by company for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		Change		Change
	(in millions of Ch$)						(in %)
Generation and Transmission Business
Endesa Chile and subsidiaries (Chile) (1)		265,281		165,530		99,751		60.3
Endesa Costanera (Argentina)		21,144		(22,088)		43,232		n.a.
El Chocón (Argentina)		14,236		24,865		(10,629)		(42.7)
Cemsa (Argentina)		(441)		—		(441)		n.a
Dock Sud (Argentina)		(2,536)		—		(2,536)		n.a
Cachoeira Dourada (Brazil)		81,808		105,124		(23,316)		(22.2)
Endesa Fortaleza (Brazil)		49,039		41,872		7,167		17.1
CIEN (Brazil)		32,530		36,940		(4,410)		(11.9)
Emgesa (Colombia)		363,993		337,651		26,342		7.8
Edegel (Peru)		112,192		100,898		11,294		11.2
EEPSA (Peru)		7,249		—		7,249		n.a
Total		944,495		790,792		153,703		19.4
Distribution Business
Chilectra and subsidiaries (Chile)		138,881		133,375		5,506		4.1
Edesur (Argentina)		121,998		(54,103)		176,101		n.a.
Ampla (Brazil)		172,199		173,716		(1,517)		(0.9)
Coelce (Brazil)		61,417		131,006		(69,589)		(53.1)
Codensa (Colombia) (1)		240,888		238,771		2,117		0.9
Edelnor (Peru)		84,105		70,069		14,036		20.0
Total		819,488		692,834		126,654		18.3
Less: consolidation adjustments and non-core activities		(22,845)		(12,863)		(9,982)		77.7
Total		1,741,138		1,470,763		270,375		18.4

(1) Restated in accordance with IFRS 11.

144

Non-Operating Results

The following table shows the non-operating results for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		Change		Change
	(in millions of Ch$)						(in %)
Financial result
Financial income		260,127		232,130		27,997		12.1
Financial costs		(388,368)		(419,889)		31,521		7.5
Gain (loss) for indexed assets and liabilities		(9,415)		(12,757)		3,342		26.2
Net foreign currency exchange differences		(30,373)		(16,126)		(14,247)		(88.3)
Total		(168,029)		(216,642)		48,613		22.4
Other non-operating results
Total gain (loss) on sale of non-current assets not held for sale		19,170		15,186		3,984		26.2
Other non-operating income		25,289		30,382		(5,093)		(16.8)
Total		44,459		45,568		(1,109)		(2.4)
Non-operating results		(123,570)		(171,074)		47,504		27.8

Financial Result

The net financial result was a loss of Ch$ 168.0 billion, an improvement of Ch$ 48.6 billion, or 22.4%, with respect to 2012.

We recorded higher interest income of Ch$ 28.0 billion, mainly due to (i) Ch$ 37.6 billion higher investment income from the proceeds of the 2013 capital increase, (ii) Ch$ 27.9 billion higher Edesur income due to the effects of the implementation of Resolution 250/13 and (iii) Ch$ 17.7 billion higher income in Ampla due to a correction of recoverable taxes. These effects were partially offset by a (i) lower valuation of the future concession termination value for Ampla and Coelce, which resulted in lower income from financing agreements in 2026 of Ch$ 50.5 billion and in 2028 of Ch$ 2.7 billion, respectively and (ii) a Ch$ 2.0 billion decrease in other income.

We recorded lower financial expenses of Ch$ 31.5 billion, mainly the result of a Ch$ 25.7 billion decrease in financial costs of bank loans and bonds and a Ch$ 6.1 billion decrease on the interest of the contingencies.

We recorded a lower charge for indexation adjustments of Ch$ 3.3 billion due to the effect produced by variations in the value of the UF with respect to UF denominated debt of Chilean companies. This is because the UF increased in value by 2.1% in 2013 compared with the 2.5% increase in 2012.

We recorded a higher charge for foreign currency exchange differences of Ch$ 14.3 billion, mainly due to gains derived from variations in exchange rates, on cash and cash equivalents of Ch$ 2.5 billion, accounts receivable, financial assets, and other receivables in U.S. dollars of Ch$ 43.2 billion and losses on U.S. dollar liabilities of Ch$ 59.9 billion.

Result of Asset Sales

The gain on asset sales was Ch$ 4.0 billion, due to profits obtained from transmission line sales of Ch$ 2.5 billion, sale of land of Ch$ 0.6 billion and other sales of Ch$ 0.8 billion.

145

Net Income

The following table sets forth our net income for the periods indicated.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		Change		Change
	(in millions of Ch$)						(in %)
Operating income		1,741,138		1,470,763		270,375		18.4
Non-operating results		(123,570)		(171,074)		47,504		(27.8)
Net income before taxes		1,617,568		1,299,689		317,879		24.5
Income tax		(504,167)		(406,676)		(97,491)		24.0
Net income		1,113,401		893,013		220,388		24.7
Net income attributable to: shareholders of Enersis		658,514		377,351		281,163		74.5
Net income attributable to: Non-controlling interests		454,887		515,662		(60,775)		(11.8)

Corporate Income Tax

Corporate income tax shows an increased charge of Ch$ 97.5 billion, mainly due to Ch$ 74.3 billion higher taxes in Enersis, Ch$ 51.4 billion in Endesa Chile, Ch$ 13.6 billion in Edesur, Ch$ 8.9 billion in Emgesa, Ch$ 7.1 billion in Inversiones Sudamérica, Ch$ 6.6 billion in Chilectra, Ch$ 5.5 billion in Codensa, Ch$ 5.0 billion in Celta, Ch$ 1.6 billion in Dock Sud, and Ch$1.1 billion in EEPSA. This was partially compensated by a Ch$ 43.4 million reduction in taxes in Pehuenche and a Ch$ 33.7 billion reduction in Coelce. For further detail please see Note 33 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

3. Results of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Revenues

Generation and Transmission Business

The following table sets forth the electricity sales of our subsidiaries and the corresponding changes for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

	Electricity sales during the year ended December 31,
	2012		2011		Change		Change
	(in GWh)						(in %)
Endesa Chile (Chile) (1)		20,878		20,316		562		2.8
El Chocón (Argentina)		3,197		2,888		309		10.7
Endesa Costanera (Argentina)		8,655		8,493		162		1.9
Endesa Fortaleza (Brazil)		2,947		2,842		105		3.7
Emgesa (Colombia)		16,304		15,112		1,192		7.9
Cachoeira Dourada (Brazil)		4,344		3,986		358		9.0
Edegel (Peru)		9,587		9,450		137		1.5
Total		65,912		63,087		2,825		4.5

(1) Includes Endesa Chile and its Chilean subsidiaries, restated in accordance with IFRS 11.

146

Distribution Business

Distribution revenues are mainly derived from the resale of electricity purchased from generators. Revenues associated with distribution include the recovery of the cost of electricity purchased and the resulting revenue from the VAD, which is associated with the recovery of costs and the return on the investment with respect to the distribution assets, plus the physical energy losses permitted by the applicable regulator. Other revenue derived from our distribution services consists of charges for new connections and the maintenance and rental of meters.

The following table sets forth the electricity sales of our subsidiaries, by country, and their corresponding variations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

	Electricity sales during the year ended December 31,
	2012		2011		Change		Change
	(in GWh)						(in %)
Chilectra (Chile)		14,445		13,697		748		5.5
Edesur (Argentina)		17,738		17,233		505		2.9
Coelce (Brazil)		9,878		8,970		908		10.1
Ampla (Brazil)		10,816		10,223		593		5.8
Codensa (Colombia) (1)		12,972		12,552		420		3.4
Edelnor (Peru)		6,863		6,572		291		4.4
Total		72,712		69,247		3,465		5.0

(1) Restated in accordance with IFRS 11.

Revenues by Business Segment

The table below presents our revenues by business segment for 2012 and 2011.

	Year ended December 31,
	2012		2011		Change		Change
	(in millions of Ch$)						(in %)
Generation and Transmission Business
Endesa and subsidiaries (Chile) (1)		1,104,776		1,135,176		(30,400)		(2.7)
Endesa Costanera (Argentina)		295,140		341,824		(46,684)		(13.7)
El Chocón (Argentina)		49,193		48,341		852		1.8
Cachoeira Dourada (Brazil)		155,195		126,646		28,549		22.5
Endesa Fortaleza (Brazil)		139,186		129,485		9,701		7.5
CIEN (Brazil)		72,523		59,918		12,605		21.0
Emgesa (Colombia)		580,125		498,569		81,556		16.4
Edegel (Peru)		282,124		239,842		42,282		17.6
Total		2,678,262		2,579,801		98,461		3.8
Distribution Business
Chilectra and subsidiaries (Chile)		984,738		1,046,191		(61,453)		(5.9)
Edesur (Argentina)		321,242		279,725		41,517		14.8
Ampla (Brazil)		1,074,237		1,117,269		(43,032)		(3.9)
Coelce (Brazil)		806,428		859,446		(53,018)		(6.2)
Codensa (Colombia) (1)		851,622		783,050		68,572		8.8
Edelnor (Peru)		385,014		329,309		55,705		16.9
Total		4,423,281		4,414,990		8,291		0.2
Less: Consolidation adjustments and non-core activities		(605,590)		(608,191)		2,601		(0.4)
Total		6,495,953		6,386,600		109,353		1.7

(1) Restated in accordance with IFRS 11.

147

Generation and Transmission Business: Revenues

Revenues in Chile decreased by 2.7% for the year ended December 31, 2012, mainly due to an 5.3% reduction in average energy sale prices, which in turn was a result of lower indexation of contracts to the marginal cost in Chile and to lower electricity sales.

In Argentina, revenues of Endesa Costanera decreased 13.7% for the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of lower average energy sale prices expressed in local currency. Electricity sales reached 8,654.7 GWh for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to 8,493.3 GWh for the year ended December 31, 2011. Revenues of El Chocón increased 1.8%, mainly as a result of higher electricity sales in the spot market, resulting from a 16% increase in hydroelectric generation of the period. Electricity sales reached 3,196.8 GWh for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to 2,887.7 GWh for the year ended December 31, 2011. The net effect of translating results from the Argentine peso to Chilean peso was negative, resulting in an 8.6% decline in revenues in Chilean peso terms.

In Brazil, revenues of Cachoeira Dourada increased 22.5% for the year ended December 31, 2012, as a result of a 358.4 GWh increase in electricity sales to 4,344.5 GWh for the year ended December 31, 2012. This increase in electricity sales was primarily due to higher energy generation, in addition to the higher average sales price, expressed in local currency. Revenues of Endesa Fortaleza increased 7.5% for the year ended December 31, 2012, due to higher average sales prices, expressed in local currency, and 104.6 GWh greater electricity sales for the year ended December 31, 2012. Revenues of CIEN increased 21.0% for the year ended December 31, 2012, due to greater toll revenues that were in effect for the full year of 2012 compared to only being in effect starting in mid-April in 2011. The effect of currency translation on our revenue derived from Brazil was negative, causing a 13.9% reduction in Chilean peso terms, compared to the same period of 2011.

In Colombia, revenues of Emgesa increased Ch$ 81.6 billion, or 16.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2012, mainly as a result of a 7.9% increase in electricity sales attributable to greater hydroelectric generation. Additionally, the average energy sale price expressed in local currency increased as a result of higher wholesale market energy prices in effect since August 2012. The effect of currency translation from Colombian pesos to Chilean pesos caused a 3.4% increase in revenues in Chilean peso terms, compared to the same period of 2011.

Revenues of Edegel, our generation company in Peru, increased Ch$ 42.3 billion, or 17.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2012. This was due to the increase in the average energy sale price, as a consequence of the higher contract prices as a result of the indexation to fuel prices and the higher node price in effect since May 2012. The effect of currency translation increased revenues by 5.0% in Chilean peso terms, compared to the same period of 2011.

Distribution Business: Revenues

In Chile, revenues of our subsidiary Chilectra declined Ch$ 61.5 billion, or 5.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2012, as a consequence of a reduction in the average energy sales price during 2012, partly offset by 748 GWh higher electricity sales, reaching 14,445 GWh for the year ended December 31, 2012 and Ch$ 4.3 billion from higher activity in other products and services businesses, relocating street lighting and networks. The number of customers increased by 21,422, exceeding 1.6 million.

In Argentina, revenues of Edesur increased by 14.8% for the year ended December 31, 2012, mainly due to higher average energy sales prices in local currency, as well as a 2.9% increase in electricity sales. Electricity sales reached 17,738 GWh for the year ended December 31, 2012. The number of customers remained constant at approximately 2.4 million.

In Brazil, the revenues of our subsidiary Ampla decreased 3.9% for the year ended December 31, 2012, mainly as a result of the effect of currency translation which caused a 13.9% reduction for the year ended December 31, 2012 when compared to the same period of 2011, in spite of a 5.8% increase in electricity sales and higher average energy sales prices expressed in local currency. Electricity sales for the year ended December 31, 2012 reached 10,816 GWh and the number of customers of Ampla increased by 68,849 customers, exceeding 2.7 million. Revenues of Coelce decreased 6.2% for the year ended December 31, 2012, mainly as a result of the Chilean peso translation effect, which caused a 13.9% decrease for the year ended December 31, 2012. This decrease resulted in a Ch$ 53 billion decrease in operating revenues, despite a electricity sales increase of 10.1% and increases in the average sales price in local currency. The number of customers for Coelce increased by 113,785 for the year ended December 31, 2012, to more than 3.3 million and electricity sales were 9,878 GWh for the year ended December 31, 2012.

148

In Colombia, revenues of our subsidiary Codensa increased 8.8% for the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of greater electricity sales, which increased 2.4% during the period and higher average sales prices when expressed in local currency. Electricity sales reached 12,972 GWh for the year ended December 31, 2012 and the number of customers increased by 92,063 to more than 2.6 million customers.

In Peru, revenues of Edelnor increased 16.9% for the year ended December 31, 2012, mainly due to an increase in electricity sales, which increased 4.4%, in addition to a higher average sales price in local currency. Other operating revenues increased by Ch$ 3.3 billion and revenues of other services increased by Ch$ 1.2 billion, mainly due to new connections. The number of customers grew by 59,027, to more than 1.2 million customers, and electricity sales reached 6,863 GWh for the year ended December 31, 2012. The effect of currency translation increased revenues by 5.0% in Chilean peso terms, compared to the same period of 2011.

Operating Costs

Operating costs consist primarily of electricity purchases from third parties, fuel purchases, depreciation, amortization and impairment losses, maintenance costs, tolls paid to transmission companies, and employee salaries. Operating costs also include administrative and selling expenses. The following table shows the breakdown of our operating costs, as a percentage of total operating costs, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. Our cost structure remained substantially the same in 2012 and 2011.

	Year ended December 31,
	2012		2011
	(percentage of total costs of operations)
Electricity purchases		36.8		35.2
Fuel purchases		15.2		14.7
Other variable cost		12.1		13.2
Other fixed costs		9.8		11.4
Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses		9.5		10.8
Transmission tolls		9.4		8.1
Staff benefit costs		7.2		6.6
Total		100%		100%

149

The table below sets forth the breakdown of operating costs by company for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Year ended December 31,
	2012		2011		Change		Change
	(in millions of Ch$)						(in %)
Generation and Transmission Business
Endesa and subsidiaries (Chile)(1)		939,246		758,755		180,491		23.8
Endesa Costanera (Argentina)		317,228		335,344		(18,116)		(5.4)
El Chocón (Argentina)		24,328		24,599		(271)		(1.1)
Cachoeira Dourada (Brazil)		50,071		36,365		13,706		37.7
Endesa Fortaleza (Brazil)		97,314		80,299		17,015		21.2
CIEN (Brazil)		35,583		(8,863)		44,446		n.a.
Emgesa (Colombia)		242,474		245,061		(2,587)		(1.1)
Edegel (Peru)		181,226		135,187		46,039		34.1
Total		1,887,470		1,606,747		280,723		17.5
Distribution Business
Chilectra and subsidiaries (Chile)		851,363		926,506		(75,143)		(8.1)
Edesur (Argentina)		375,345		416,895		(41,550)		(10.0)
Ampla (Brazil)		900,521		943,612		(43,091)		(4.6)
Coelce (Brazil)		675,422		678,458		(3,036)		(0.4)
Codensa (Colombia)(1)		612,851		603,690		9,161		1.5
Edelnor (Peru)		314,945		259,409		55,536		21.4
Total		3,730,447		3,828,570		(98,123)		(2.6)
Less: consolidation adjustments and non-core activities		(592,727)		(587,645)		(5,082)		0.9
Total		5,025,191		4,847,673		177,518		3.7

(1) Restated in accordance with IFRS 11.

Generation and Transmission Business: Operating Costs

The operating costs of Endesa Chile increased Ch$ 180.5 billion, or 23.8% for the year ended December 31, 2012, mainly as a result of an increase of Ch$ 65.7 billion in fuel consumption costs and Ch$ 34.5 billion greater transportation costs as a consequence of higher tolls related to the drought in the south central area of the country. The cost of energy purchases increased Ch$ 62.8 billion due to higher spot market purchase prices. In addition, depreciation and impairment losses increased Ch$ 10.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2012 and fixed costs increased Ch$ 7.4 billion. Production decreased 0.7% to 19,825 GWh for the year ended December 31, 2012.

In Argentina, operating costs of Endesa Costanera decreased Ch$ 18.1 billion, or 5.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2012, mainly due to a Ch$ 30.7 billion decrease in procurement and services costs resulting from a Ch$ 27.8 billion decrease in fuel consumption costs and a Ch$ 3.1 billion decrease in transportation costs. This was partially offset by a Ch$ 5.7 billion increase in personnel costs and other fixed costs mainly due to union negotiations and a higher number of employees and a Ch$ 6.9 billion increase in depreciation and impairment losses. Production increased 1.1% to 8,488 GWh for the year ended December 31, 2012. Operating costs of El Chocón decreased 1.1% due to a Ch$ 2.7 billion decrease in procurement and services costs. This decrease is primarily the result of a Ch$ 1.6 billion decrease in energy purchases costs and a Ch$ 1 billion decrease in other variable procurement costs, as a consequence of 2,801 GWh generation increase for the year ended December 31, 2012, a 16.5% increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. This was partially offset by a Ch$ 2.1 billion increase in other fixed costs.

150

In Brazil, the operating costs of Cachoeira Dourada increased 37.7%, or Ch$ 13.7 billion, to Ch$ 50.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2012. This increase is primarily the result of a Ch$ 11.6 billion increase in procurement and services costs due to a Ch$ 10.8 billion increase in energy purchases costs and a Ch$ 2.9 billion increase in depreciation and impairment losses. Energy generation for the year ended December 31, 2012 reached 3,722.4 GWh, 19.3% more than the previous year. The operating costs of Endesa Fortaleza increased by Ch$ 17 billion for the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily as a result of a Ch$ 16.5 billion increase in procurement and services costs, which in turn was a result of a Ch$ 17.9 billion increase in energy purchases costs and a Ch$ 3.2 billion increase in other variable costs, partially offset by a Ch$ 4 billion decrease in fuel purchases. Energy generation reached 1,454.5 GWh, a 40.7% increase from the year ended December 31, 2011. Operating costs of CIEN increased by Ch$ 44.4 billion, which is primarily the result of a provision reversal for accounts receivable considered not recoverable for Ch$ 20.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 and another amounting to Ch$ 27.8 billion, corresponding to sales tax that did not apply in 2012.

The operating costs of Emgesa decreased Ch$ 2.6 billion or 1.0% for the year ended December 31, 2012, mainly as a result of a Ch$ 40 billion decrease in fixed costs resulting from the non-recurring effect of the equity tax reform driven by the Colombian government during the first trimester of 2011 and which led to a Ch$ 43.5 billion negative effect on Emgesa’s operating result for the year ended December 31, 2012. This was partially offset by a Ch$ 36.2 billion increase in procurement and services costs, due to a Ch$ 19.7 billion increase in costs of energy purchases as a consequence of higher spot market energy purchase prices, and a Ch$ 12.3 billion increase in fuel consumption cost; in addition depreciation, amortization and impairment losses increased Ch$ 1.2 billion. Energy generation reached 13,294 GWh in 2012, which represents a 10% increase when compared to 2011, which increase was mainly attributable to increased hydroelectric generation.

Operating costs of Edegel increased Ch$ 46 billion, or 34.1%, mainly as a consequence of Ch$ 15.2 billion greater personnel costs due to the one time effect of a provision reversal registered in 2011 of Ch$ 14.6 billion in personnel expenses. Additionally, energy purchase costs increased Ch$ 14.7 billion as a result of greater spot market electricity purchases, along with Ch$ 6.1 billion greater fuel consumption costs, partially due to greater diesel generation, in both cases as the result of maintenance performed to the dual gas units. Transportation costs increased by Ch$ 3.3 billion and depreciation, amortization and impairment losses increased by Ch$ 2.2 billion. Energy generation fell 4.5% to 8,740.3 GWh for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Distribution Business: Operating Costs

The operating costs of Chilectra decreased Ch$ 75.1 billion, or 8.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2012, due to a Ch$ 75.9 billion decrease in procurement and services costs. This decrease was primarily the result of a Ch$ 85.4 billion decrease in energy purchases partially offset by a Ch$ 7 billion increase in transportation costs and a Ch$ 2.6 billion increase in other variable costs. Physical energy losses decreased by 0.1 percentage points to 5.4% for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The operating costs of Edesur decreased Ch$ 41.6 billion, or 10.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2012. This decrease is principally the result of a Ch$ 105.7 billion decrease in depreciation, amortization and impairment losses because a Ch$ 106.5 billion impairment loss related to Property, Plant and Equipment was booked during the fourth quarter of 2011, which almost covers the total amount of equity risk that this company represents for Enersis. This decrease was partially offset by a Ch$ 33.5 billion increase in procurement and services costs that was primarily the result of an increase in energy purchase costs. Higher energy purchase costs in turn resulted from a higher average purchase price and an increase in electricity purchases. Additionally, fixed operating costs increased by Ch$ 30.6 billion, due to an increase in wage costs caused by inflation, the entry into agreements with union employees and an increase in other fixed costs of contracted procurement and services which have experienced an overall price increase due to inflation. Edesur’s negative operating performance was attributable to an increase in operating costs as a result to inflation in Argentina, without a corresponding tariff increase due to delays by the Argentine government in complying with certain obligations contained in Edesur’s agreement with the Argentine government. This non-compliance primarily consists of failure to observe the cost monitoring mechanism set forth in the agreement, which requires recognition of tariff adjustments every six months and the performance of an overall tariff revision. Physical energy losses increased by 0.1 percentage points to 10.6% for the year ended December 31, 2012.

151

The operating costs of Edelnor increased Ch$ 55.5 billion, or 21.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2012, mainly due to a Ch$ 41.1 billion increase in procurement and services costs, as a consequence of a Ch$ 40 billion increase in energy purchase costs and Ch$ 1.1 billion in other variable costs. Additionally, personnel costs increased by Ch$ 8.3 billion mainly due to a Ch$ 5.4 billion one time reversal of a personnel expense provision booked in 2011. Physical energy losses remained stable at 8.2% for the year ended December 31, 2012.

In Brazil, the operating costs of Ampla decreased Ch$ 43.1 billion, or 4.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2012. This decrease was primarily the result of a Ch$ 50.8 billion decrease in procurement and services costs, which decrease resulted from a Ch$ 50 billion decrease in energy purchase costs and a Ch$ 37 billion decrease in other variable procurement costs, partially offset by a Ch$ 37 billion increase in transportation costs. Additionally, fixed costs decreased by Ch$ 10.2 billion, partially offset by a Ch$ 17.9 billion increase in depreciation, amortization and impairment losses costs. Physical energy losses decreased by 0.1 percentage points to 19.6% for the year ended December 31, 2012. The operating costs of Coelce decreased by Ch$ 3 billion, or 0.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2012. This decrease is primarily the result of a Ch$ 5 billion decrease in depreciation, amortization and impairment losses, partially offset by a Ch$ 1.3 billion increase in procurement and services costs resulting from a Ch$ 14.1 billion increase in energy purchases, partly offset by a Ch$ 12.5 billion decrease in other variable costs. Physical energy losses increased by 0.7 percentage points to 12.6% for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Operating costs of Codensa increased by Ch$ 9.2 billion, or 1.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2012. This increase was primarily the result of a Ch$ 27.6 billion increase in procurement and services costs, primarily explained by a Ch$ 21.1 billion increase in energy purchases, a Ch$ 2.9 billion increase in energy transportation costs and a Ch$ 3.9 billion increase in other variable procurement cost. This was partially offset by a Ch$ 24.0 billion decrease in fixed costs related to the non-recurring effect of the Colombian government’s equity tax reform promulgated in 2011, which caused a Ch$ 28.6 billion negative impact on operating results for the year ended December 31, 2011, but did not affect Codensa’s results for the year ended December 31, 2012. Physical energy losses decreased by 0.5 percentage points to 7.5% for the year ended December 31, 2012.

152

Operating Income

The following table summarizes operating income by company for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

	Year ended December 31,
	2012		2011		Change		Change
	(in millions of Ch$)						(in %)
Generation and Transmission Business
Endesa Chile and subsidiaries (Chile)(1)		165,530		376,421		(210,891)		(56.0)
Endesa Costanera (Argentina)		(22,088)		6,480		(28,568)		n.a.
El Chocón (Argentina)		24,865		23,742		1,123		4.7
Cachoeira Dourada (Brazil)		105,124		90,281		14,843		16.4
Endesa Fortaleza (Brazil)		41,872		49,186		(7,314)		(14.9)
CIEN (Brazil)		36,940		68,781		(31,841)		(46.3)
Emgesa (Colombia)		337,651		253,508		84,143		33.2
Edegel (Peru)		100,898		104,654		(3,756)		(3.6)
Total		790,792		973,053		(182,261)		(18.7)
Distribution Business
Chilectra and subsidiaries (Chile)		133,375		119,685		13,690		11.4
Edesur (Argentina)		(54,103)		(137,170)		83,068		60.6
Ampla (Brazil)		173,716		173,657		59		0.0
Coelce (Brazil)		131,006		180,988		(49,983)		(27.6)
Codensa (Colombia)(1)		238,771		179,360		59,411		33.1
Edelnor (Peru)		70,069		69,900		169		0.2
Total		692,834		586,420		106,414		18.1
Less: Consolidation Adjustments and non-core activities		(12,863)		(20,546)		7,683		(37.4)
Total		1,470,763		1,538,927		(68,164)		(4.4)

(1) Restated in accordance with IFRS 11.

Non-Operating Results

The following table shows the non-operating results for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

	Year ended December 31,
	2012		2011		Change		Change
	(in millions of Ch$)						(in %)
Financial result
Financial income		232,130		194,546		37,584		19.3
Financial costs		(419,889)		(423,128)		3,240		0.7
Gain (loss) for indexed assets and liabilities		(12,757)		(25,207)		12,450		49.3
Net foreign currency exchange differences		(16,126)		20,124		(36,250)		n.a.
Total		(216,642)		(233,666)		17,024		7.3
Other non-operating results
Total gain (loss) on sale of non-current assets not held for sale		15,186		(5,769)		20,955		n.a.
Other non-operating income		30,382		27,929		2,453		8.8
Total		45,568		22,160		23,408		105.6
Non-operating results		(171,074)		(211,506)		40,432		19.1

153

Financial Result

The total financial result for the year ended December 31, 2012 was a Ch$ 216.6 billion expense, which represents an 7.3% reduction, or Ch$ 17.0 billion, when compared to 2011. The above is primarily the result of:

Financial income increased Ch$ 37.6 billion as a result of the valuation of the current value of non-amortized assets at the concession expiration date of Ampla and Coelce based on the net replacement value of electricity assets depreciated by Ch$ 112.3 billion, partially offset by (1) a decrease in the current value of Cachoeira Dourada’s accounts receivables from CELG Distribuiçao S.A. of Ch$ 24.3 billion, (2) a Ch$ 13 billion decrease in income from cash deposits in Ampla and Coelce, (3) a Ch$ 10 billion decrease in income from pension plan assets in Brazil, (4) a decrease in income from Endesa Eco related to the value of the put option of Canela equivalent to Ch$ 6.6 billion and (5) a decrease in financial income of Endesa Costanera due to the Ch$ 2.6 billion accounts receivable from CAMMESA.

Financial expenses decreased Ch$ 3.2 billion mainly due to (1) a Ch$ 20.6 billion decrease in financial expenses of CIEN, caused by a lower level of average debt during the period and lower current value of fines imposed, (2) a Ch$ 19.4 billion decrease in financial expenses of Ampla due to a lower current value of contingencies, (3) a Ch$ 9.6 billion decrease in financial expenses of Endesa Fortaleza and (4) a Ch$ 7.5 billion decrease in financial expenses of Investluz, in both cases due to lower current value of contingencies for the year ended December 31, 2012. The aforementioned is partially offset by a Ch$ 24.3 billion increase in financial expenses of Coelce due to the current value of litigations and fines imposed and a Ch$ 20.5 billion increase in financial expenses of Edesur due to greater interest expenses on loans and accounts payable to CAMMESA.

Expenses per adjustment units declined Ch$ 12.4 billion due to the impact of the change in value of the UF on the debt, denominated in UF, that some companies have in Chile. This is due to a 2.5% increase in the value of the UF for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to a 3.9% increase for the year ended December 31, 2011.

These amounts were partially offset by greater currency exchange differences, which increased Ch$ 36.2 billion mainly due to (1) a Ch$ 7.6 billion loss caused by exchange rate variations on cash and cash equivalents, (2) a Ch$ 19.1 billion loss related to accounts receivables and other receivables in U.S. dollars and (3) a Ch$ 9 billion loss in other non-financial assets.

Result of Asset Sales

The result from asset sales led to a positive variation of Ch$ 21 billion, mainly explained by booking a Ch$ 10.7 billion loss in 2011 related to the sale of our electrical parts procurement business, Compañía Americana de Multiservicios Ltda. (CAM), and Synapsis Soluciones y Servicios IT Ltda. and Ch$ 5.4 billion greater income from the sale of real property of Coelce and of Inmobiliaria Manso de Velasco in 2012.

The total non-operating result therefore showed a decrease of Ch$ 40.4 billion over the same period of the previous year.

154

Net Income

The following table sets forth our net income for the periods indicated.

	Year ended December 31,
	2012		2011		Change		Change
	(in millions of Ch$)						(in %)
Operating income		1,470,763		1,538,927		(68,164)		(4.4)
Non-operating results		(171,094)		(211,506)		44,432		(19.1)
Net income before taxes		1,299,689		1,327,421		(27,732)		(2.1)
Income tax		(406,676)		(455,469)		48,793		(10.7)
Net income from continuing operations after tax		893,013		871,952		21,061		2.4
Net income from discontinued operations		—		—		—		—
Net income		893,013		871,952		21,061		2.4
Net income attributable to:   shareholders of Enersis		377,351		375,471		1,880		0.5
Net income attributable to:   non-controlling interests		515,662		496,481		19,182		3.9

Corporate Income Tax

Income tax declined Ch$ 48.8 billion, primarily as a result of (1) a Ch$ 61 billion decrease in taxes of Endesa Chile, (2) a Ch$ 16.4 billion decrease in taxes of Endesa Costanera, (3) a Ch$ 15.2 billion decrease in taxes of Edesur, (4) a Ch$ 19.2 billion decrease in taxes of Enersis, (5) a Ch$ 10.3 billion decrease in taxes of Cachoeira Dourada, (6) a Ch$ 9.7 billion decrease in taxes of San Isidro, (7) a Ch$ 7.5 billion decrease in taxes of Coelce, (8) a Ch$ 8.4 billion decrease in taxes of CIEN, and (9) a Ch$ 8.8 billion decrease in taxes of Chilectra. These amounts were partially offset by (1) a Ch$ 43.8 billion increase in taxes of Pehuenche, (2) a Ch$ 16.9 billion increase in taxes of Emgesa, (3) a Ch$ 9.7 billion increase in taxes of Codensa and (4) a Ch$ 3.5 billion increase in taxes of Edegel.

B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.

We are a company with no significant assets other than the stock of our subsidiaries. The following discussion of cash sources and uses reflects the key drivers of our cash flow.

We receive cash inflows from our subsidiaries, as well as from related companies in Chile and abroad. Foreign subsidiaries and associates’ cash flows may not be available to satisfy our own liquidity needs, mainly because they are not wholly-owned, and because there is a time lag before we have effective access to those funds, through dividends or capital reductions.

However, we believe that cash flow generated from our business operations, as well as cash balances, borrowings from commercial banks, and ample access to both Chilean and foreign capital markets will be sufficient to satisfy all our needs for working capital, debt service, dividends and routine capital expenditures.

In March 2013, we completed a US$ 6.0 billion capital increase, pursuant to which our minority shareholders contributed approximately US$ 2.4 billion and Endesa Spain contributed in-kind with assets worth US$ 3.6 million (see “Item 4 — A. History and development of the company”).

155

Set forth below is the consolidated cash flow from an accounting perspective.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
	(in billions of Ch$)
Net cash flows from (used in) operating activities		1,701		1,543		1,673
Net cash flows from (used in) investing activities		(1,224)		(842)		(616)
Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities		337		(1,012)		(875)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents before effect of exchange rates changes		814		(311)		182
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(24)		(61)		76
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		816		1.188		930
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		1,606		816		1,188

For the year ended December 31, 2013, cash provided by operating activities was Ch$ 1,701 billion, an increase of Ch$ 158 billion, or 10.2% compared to 2012, primarily as a consequence of a decrease in payments to suppliers for goods and services of Ch$ 208 billion, a decrease in other payments for operating activities of Ch$ 175 billion, an increase in other collections from operating activities of Ch$ 125 billion, a Ch$ 71 billion decrease in income tax payments, mainly in Chile and Brazil, and an increase in collections from premiums and services, annual payments, and other obligations from policies held of Ch$ 68 billion, all of which were partially offset by the decrease in collections from the sale of goods and services of Ch$ 476 billion, mainly in Chile and Brazil and a Ch$ 48 billion increase in payments to and on behalf of employees, mainly in Chile and Argentina.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, cash provided by operating activities was Ch$ 1,543 billion, a decrease of Ch$ 130 billion, or 7.8% compared to 2011, primarily as a consequence of a Ch$ 132 billion decrease in collections from the sale of goods and services, mainly in Chile, Brazil and Colombia, an increase in payments to suppliers for goods and services of Ch$ 95 billion, an increase by Ch$ 94 billion in income tax payments, mainly in Peru and Brazil, a Ch$ 50 billion increase in payments to and on behalf of employees, mainly in Chile and Argentina, an increase in other outflows of cash of Ch$ 78 billion, all of which were partially offset by an increase in other collections from operating activities of Ch$ 133 billion and a decrease in other payments for operating activities of Ch$ 193 billion.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, investing activities generated a net cash outflow of Ch$ 1,224 billion, which was Ch$ 382 billion or 45.3% less cash equivalent than the previous year. These expenditures primarily consist of investments in deposits with a period greater than 90 days for Ch$ 562 billion, acquiring fixed assets totaling Ch$ 603 billion, incorporating intangible assets (under IFRIC 12) for Ch$ 169 billion, increasing investment in Hidroaysén for Ch$ 5 billion, all of which was partially offset by interest received of Ch$ 92 billion, other cash inflows of Ch$ 14 billion and dividends received of Ch$ 9 billion.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, investing activities generated a net cash ouflow of Ch $ 842 billion, which was $ 226 billion, or 37.2% less than in 2011. These expenditures were primarily related to investments in deposits with a period greater than 90 days for Ch$ 194 billion, acquiring fixed assets of Ch $ 517 billion, incorporating intangible assets (under IFRIC 12 in Brazil) of Ch$ 187 billion, increasing investment in Hidroaysén for Ch$ 7 billion, all of which was partially offset by interest received of Ch$ 56 billion and dividends received of Ch$ 7 billion.

For the year ended on December 31, 2013, cash generated from financing activities was Ch$ 337 billion. The main drivers of this change are described below.

The aggregate cash inflows were primarily due to:

• Ch$ 120 billion in loans by Ampla.

• Ch$ 46 billion in loans by Coelce.

• Ch$ 149 billion in bond issuances by Emgesa.

• Ch$ 99 billion in bond issuances by Codensa.

156

• Ch$ 62 billion in bond issuances and Ch$ 13 billion in loans by Edelnor.

• Ch$ 10.8 billion in capital increases by Costanera.

• Ch$ 20 billion in loans by El Chocón.

• Ch$ 1,121 billion in capital increase by Enersis (cash portion only).

The aggregate cash outflows were primarily due to:

• Ch$ 482 billion in dividend payments (including Ch$ 188 billion from Enersis and Ch$ 47 billion from Endesa Chile on a stand-alone basis, among others).

• Ch$ 231 billion of interest expense (including Ch$ 54 billion in Endesa Chile on a stand-alone basis, Ch$ 51 billion in Emgesa among others).

• Ch$ 152 billion on payments of loans and bonds in Endesa Brasil on a consolidated basis.

• Ch$ 258 billion on payments of loans, bonds and other and other financial instruments from Endesa Chile.

For the year ended on December 31, 2012, cash used by financing activities was Ch$ 1,012 billion. The main drivers of this change are described below.

The aggregate cash inflows were primarily due to:

• Ch$ 4.8 billion in loans by Edegel .

• Ch$ 33 billion in bond issuances by Edelnor.

• Ch$ 218 billion in aggregate loans and bond issuances by Emgesa.

• Ch$ 124 billion in bond issuances by Ampla issuances.

• Ch$ 15 billion in funds received from Banco do Nordeste do Brasil (“BNB”) by Coelce .

The aggregate cash outflows were primarily due to:

• Ch$ 547 billion in dividend payments (including Ch$ 186 billion from Enersis on a stand-alone, Ch$ 88 billion from Endesa Chile on a stand-alone basis among others).

• Ch$ 254 billion of interest expense (including Ch$ 67 billion in Endesa Chile on a stand-alone basis, Ch$ 39 billion in Emgesa and Ch$ 67 billion in Endesa Brasil).

• Endesa Brasil consolidated Ch$ 272 billion in payments on loans, bonds and other debt instruments (including Ch$ 150 billion in Ampla, Ch$ 62 billion in Coelce and Ch$ 53 billion in CIEN).

• Endesa Chile consolidated Ch$ 263 billion in payments on loans and other financial instruments.

For a description of liquidity risks related to our company, please see “Item 3. Key Information — D. Risk Factors — We depend in part on payments from our subsidiaries and affiliates to meet our payment obligations.”

We coordinate the overall financing strategy of our majority-owned subsidiaries. Our operating subsidiaries independently develop their capital expenditure plans. Generally, our policy is to have the operating subsidiaries independently finance their capital expansion programs through internally generated funds or direct financings. For information regarding our commitments for capital expenditures, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — A. History and Development of the Company — Investments, Capital Expenditures and Divestitures” and our contractual obligations table set forth below.

We have accessed the equity capital markets (including several SEC-registered ADS issuances) in 1993, 1996, 2000, 2003 and 2013, and in 1994 for Endesa Chile. We have also issued bonds in the United States (“Yankee Bonds”) for both Enersis and Endesa Chile. Since 1996, we, Endesa Chile and its subsidiary Pehuenche have issued a total of US$ 3,520 million in Yankee Bonds.

The following table lists the Yankee Bonds issued by us and Endesa Chile outstanding as of December 31, 2013. The weighted average annual coupon interest rate for such bonds is 7.7%, without giving effect to each bond’s duration, or put options.

157

							Aggregate Principal Amount
Issuer	Term		Maturity		Coupon		Issued		Outstanding
					(in %)		(in millions of US$)
Enersis		10 years		January 2014		7.375		350		350
Enersis (1)		10 years		December 2016		7.400		350		250
Enersis (2)		30 years		December 2026		6.600		150		1
Enersis total						7.384 (4)		850		601
Endesa Chile		12 years		August 2015		8.625		200		200
Endesa Chile (1)		30 years		February 2027		7.875		230		206
Endesa Chile (3)		40 years		February 2037		7.325		220		71
Endesa Chile (1)		100 years		February 2097		8.125		200		40
Endesa Chile total						8.109 (4)		850		517
Total						7.720 (4)		1,700		1,118

(1) Enersis and Endesa Chile repurchased certain of these bonds in 2001.

(2) Holders of our 6.6% Yankee Bonds due 2026 exercised a put option on December 1, 2003 for an aggregate principal amount of US$ 149 million, leaving US$ 1 million outstanding.

(3) Holders of the Endesa Chile 7.325% Yankee Bonds due 2037 exercised a put option on February 1, 2009 for a total amount of US$ 149.2 million. The remaining US$ 70.8 million principal amount of the Yankee Bonds mature in February 2037.

(4) Weighted-average coupon.

The following table lists Emgesa’s bond issued in the United States. The bond is denominated in Colombian pesos. The annual interest rate for such bond is 8.75%.

Issuer

Term

Maturity

Coupon (inflation adjusted rate)

Aggregate Principal Amount

Issued

Outstanding

(in billions of Colombian pesos)

(in billions of Colombian pesos)

(in billions of Ch$ pesos) (1)

Emgesa

10 years

January 2021

8.75%

737

737

201

(1) Calculated based on the observed exchange rate as of December 31, 2013, which was CPs$ 3.6717 per Ch$ 1.00

We and Endesa Chile, as well as our subsidiaries in the five countries in which we operate, have access to the domestic capital markets where we have issued debt instruments including commercial paper and medium and long term bonds that are primarily sold to pension funds, life insurance companies and other institutional investors.

The following table lists UF-denominated Chilean bonds issued by us and Endesa Chile, outstanding as of December 31, 2013.

Issuer	Term		Maturity		Coupon (inflation adjusted rate)		Aggregate Principal Amount
							Issued		Outstanding
							(in millions of UF)		(in millions of UF)		(in billions of Ch$)
Enersis Series B2		21 years		June 2022		5.75%		2.5		1.2		29
Endesa Chile Series H		25 years		October 2028		6.20%		4.0		3.2		74
Endesa Chile Series M		21 years		December 2029		4.75%		10.0		10.0		233
Total						5.15% (1)		16.5		14.4		336

(1) Weighted-average coupon.

For a full description of local bonds issued by us and Endesa Chile, see “Unsecured liabilities detailed by currency and maturity” and “Secured liabilities breakdown by currency and maturity” in Note 19 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

158

The following table lists local bonds issued by our foreign subsidiaries, outstanding as of December 31, 2013. We present aggregate information for each company. The maturity column for each company reflects the issuance with the longest maturity, and the coupon rate corresponds to the weighted average coupon of all issuances for each company.

Issuer	Maturity		Coupon (1)		Aggregate Principal Amount Outstanding
					(in billions of Ch$)
Ampla		June 2019		11.81%		169
Codensa		December 2025		7.02%		337
Coelce		October 2018		12.00%		98
Edegel		January 2028		6.69%		62
Edelnor		November 2038		6.65%		170
Emgesa		December 2027		6.76%		585
Total						1,422

(1) Many of the coupon rates are variable rates based on local indexes, such as inflation. The table reflects the coupon rate taking into account each local index as of December 31, 2013.

We frequently participate in the international commercial bank markets governed by the laws of the State of New York through syndicated senior unsecured loans. As of December 31, 2013, the amounts outstanding or available for these bank loans are listed below:

Borrower	Type		Maturity		Facility Amount		Amount Drawn
					(in millions of US$)		(in millions of US$)
Endesa Chile		Syndicated revolving loan		June 2014		200		—
Endesa Chile		Syndicated term loan		June 2014		200		200
Total						400		200

The Endesa Chile revolving credit facility due June 2014 does not contain a condition precedent requirement regarding the non-occurrence of a “Material Adverse Effect” (or MAE, as defined contractually) prior to a disbursement, allowing the Company full flexibility to draw on up to US$ 200 million in the aggregate from such committed revolving facility under any circumstances, including situations involving a MAE.

We and Endesa Chile also borrow from banks in Chile under fully committed facilities in which a potential MAE would not be an impediment to this source of liquidity. In early 2013, both companies entered into 3-year bilateral revolving loans for an aggregate of UF 4.8 million (equivalent to Ch$ 111 billion as of December 31, 2013) as described below.

Borrower	Type		Maturity		Facility Amount		Amount Drawn
					(in millions of US$)		(in billions of Ch$)
Enersis		Syndicated revolving loan		April 2016		106		—
Endesa Chile		Syndicated revolving loan		February 2016		106		—
Total						212		—

159

Our subsidiaries also have access to fully committed credit lines in the local markets, as detailed above.

Borrower	Type		Maturity		Facility Amount		Amount Drawn
					(in billions of Ch$)		(in billions of Ch$)
Ampla (1)		Bilateral revolving loans		2014		56		—
Coelce (1)		Bilateral revolving loans		2014		23		—
Emgesa		Bilateral revolving loans		January 2015		98		—
Total						177		—

(1) Both Ampla and Coelce have various committed credit lines, that are due during 2014.

As a result of the foregoing, we have access to fully committed undrawn revolving loans, both international and domestic, for up to approximately Ch$ 397 million in the aggregate as of December 31, 2013 (including two minor credit lines in Brazil).

We and Endesa Chile also borrow routinely from uncommitted Chilean bank facilities with approved lines of credit for approximately Ch$ 274 million in the aggregate, none of which we currently draw upon. Unlike the committed lines described above, which are not subject to material adverse event condition precedents prior to disbursements, these facilities are not guaranteed under all circumstances. Our subsidiaries also have access to uncommitted local bank facilities, for a total amount of Ch$ 211 billion, none of which we currently draw upon.

Both we and Endesa Chile may also access the Chilean commercial paper market under programs that have been registered with the Chilean SVS for a maximum of US$ 200 million for each borrower. In addition, we have a local bond program registered with the SVS for UF 12.5 million (equivalent to Ch$ 295 billion as of December 31, 2013), which has not been drawn upon yet.

Finally, our foreign subsidiaries also have access to other types of financing, including governmental facilities, supplier credit and leasing, among others.

Except for the SEC-registered Yankee Bonds, which are not subject to financial covenants, we and Endesa Chile’s outstanding debt facilities include financial covenants. The types of financial covenants, and their respective limits, vary from one type of debt to another. As of December 31, 2013, the most restrictive financial covenant affecting us was the Indebtedness to EBITDA Ratio covenant, as defined contractually, corresponding to the revolving loan facility that matures in April 2016. For Endesa Chile, the most restrictive financial covenant was the Adjusted Consolidated Leverage Ratio in connection with the syndicated term and revolving facility that matures in June 2014. Under such covenant, the maximum additional debt that could be incurred without a breach of the most restrictive covenant is Ch$ 4,114 billion and Ch$ 2,775 billion for us and Endesa Chile, respectively. As of December 31, 2013 and as of the date of this Report, we are in compliance with the financial covenants contained in our debt instruments.

As is customary for certain credit and capital market debt facilities, a significant portion of our and Endesa Chile’s financial indebtedness is subject to cross default provisions. Each of the revolving credit facilities described above, as well as all of our and Endesa Chile’s Yankee Bonds, have cross default provisions with different definitions, criteria, materiality thresholds, and applicability as to the subsidiaries that could give rise to a cross default.

The cross default provision for the Endesa Chile revolving credit facilities due in July 2014, governed by the laws of the State of New York, refers to defaults of the borrower, without reference to any subsidiary. Under such credit facilities, only matured defaults exceeding US$ 50 million qualify for a potential cross default when the principal exceeds US$ 50 million, or its equivalent in other currencies. In the case of a matured default above the materiality threshold, the revolving credit facility’s lenders would have the option to accelerate if lenders representing more than 50% of the aggregate debt of a particular facility then outstanding choose to do so. Neither of the Enersis local facilities due in April 2016 nor the Endesa Chile local facilities due in February 2016 have cross default provisions to debt other than the respective borrower’s own indebtedness.

160

Cross default provisions of Enersis and Endesa Chile Yankee Bonds may be triggered only by the debt of the respective borrower or its Chilean subsidiaries. A matured default of either Enersis, Endesa Chile or one of their respective Chilean subsidiaries could result in a cross default to Enersis’ and Endesa Chile’s Yankee Bonds if such matured default, on an individual basis, has a principal exceeding US$ 30 million, or its equivalent in other currencies. In the case of a matured default above the materiality threshold, Yankee bondholders would have the option to accelerate if either the trustee or bondholders representing no less than 25% of the aggregate debt of a particular series then outstanding choose to do so. A payment default or a bankruptcy/insolvency default outside of Chile has no contractual effect on our Yankee Bond indentures, no matter how material. Likewise, neither our nor Endesa Chile’s local bonds have subsidiary cross default provisions.

Our Argentine subsidiary, Endesa Costanera, did not make any installment payments due in 2012 and 2013 under the terms of a 1996 supplier credit agreement with Mitsubishi Corporation (“MC”). As of December 31, 2013, Endesa Costanera has missed US$ 68.5 million in payments, including principal and interest. It has experienced difficulties in making timely payments under its agreement with MC on a recurring basis since the Argentine crisis began in 2002, but had received waivers from MC in the past expressing its willingness to renegotiate payments. Additionally, MC has liens over the Mitsubishi combined cycle power plant at Endesa Costanera. Endesa Costanera carried out a capital increase in November 2013, that improved its working capital. Its weak financial situation is attributable to its inability to obtain tariff adjustments that reflect its actual generation costs.

As of the date of this Report, Endesa Costanera has not received any waivers for the past-due payments or any acceleration notices. We continue with active negotiations aimed at restructuring the debt. If MC were to declare an event of default and accelerate payment of the US$ 185 million principal and interest balance under the supplier credit agreement, Endesa Costanera would be required to enter into bankruptcy proceedings. As explained elsewhere in this section, payment defaults and bankruptcy proceedings of non Chilean subsidiaries have no financial effect on our debt obligations.

With the exception of our Argentine subsidiaries, our companies have access to existing credit lines sufficient to satisfy all of their present working capital needs. Access to the capital markets on the part of our Argentine subsidiaries has been very limited due to the difficult financial situation still prevailing in Argentina (particularly in the utilities sector), the poor capital markets environment due to the shortage of off-shore financing, the nationalization of the pension fund system and, in general, higher risk associated with lending to Argentine utilities as a consequence of the regulatory framework.

Payment of dividends and distributions by our subsidiaries and affiliates represent an important source of funds for us. The payment of dividends and distributions by certain subsidiaries and affiliates are subject to legal restrictions, such as legal reserve requirements, and capital and retained earnings criteria, and other contractual restrictions. We have been advised by legal counsel in the countries where our subsidiaries and affiliates operate that there currently are no additional legal restrictions on the payment to us of dividends or distributions to us in the jurisdictions where such subsidiaries or affiliates are incorporated. Certain credit facilities and investment agreements of our subsidiaries restrict the payment of dividends or distributions in certain special circumstances. For instance, one of Endesa Chile’s UF-denominated Chilean bonds restricts the amount of intercompany loans that Endesa Chile and its consolidated subsidiaries are allowed to lend to us. The threshold for such restriction of intercompany loans is the equivalent of US$ 100 million.

Our estimated capital expenditures for 2014 through 2018 amount to Ch$ 4,609 billion, of which Ch$ 3,631 billion are considered non-discretionary investments. We include maintenance capital expenditures as non-discretionary. It is important for us to maintain the quality and operation standards required for our facilities, but we do have some flexibility regarding the timing for these investments. We consider the investment in expansion projects under execution as non-discretionary expenditures. We consider the remaining Ch$ 978 billion to be discretionary. The latter includes expansion projects that are still under evaluation, in which case we would undertake them only if deemed profitable.

Other than in Argentina, we do not currently anticipate liquidity shortfalls affecting our ability to satisfy the material obligations described in this Report. We are currently renegotiating the terms of repayment with MC and expect to be able to refinance our indebtedness as it becomes due, fund our purchase obligations outlined previously with internally generated cash and fund capital expenditures with a mixture of internally generated cash and borrowings.

161

Transactions that most significantly affected our foreign subsidiaries’ liquidity in 2013 included:

• Endesa Costanera: capital increase for Ch$ 48 billion, of which 77% was subscribed by Endesa Chile, to support the capital structure of the company.

• Emgesa: local bond issuance for Ch$ 149 billion to finance El Quimbo investment needs.

• Edelnor: local bond issuance and bank loan totaling Ch$ 75 billion to refinance short term maturities.

• Ampla: bank loan credits for a total amount of Ch$ 120 billion to refinance short term maturities.

• El Chocón: syndicated loan with local banks for Ch$ 14 billion to refinance short term debt.

Transactions that most significantly affected our foreign subsidiaries’ liquidity in 2012 included:

• Coelce: funding from state owned BNB for investment related projects for Ch$ 13.6 billion.

• Ampla: local bond issuance for Ch$ 105 billion with five and seven year maturities, which enabled the company to increase the debt’s average life.

• Emgesa: syndicated loan with local banks for Ch$ 91 billion to refinance short-term debt and local bond issuance for Ch$ 148 billion with 10- and 15-year maturity tranches.

• Edelnor: local bond issuance for approximately Ch$ 36 billion, used to refinance indebtedness.

• Edegel: Ch$ 5 billion in a five year term loan to refinance short term maturities in 2012.

C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.

None.

D. Trend Information.

Our subsidiaries are engaged in the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity in Chile, Brazil, Colombia, Peru, and Argentina. Therefore, our businesses are subject to a wide range of conditions that may result in variability in our earnings and cash flows from year to year. In general, our net income is a result of our operating income from our generation and distribution businesses and other factors such as income from unconsolidated related companies, foreign currency exchange rate effects, and tax expense.

In our generation business, our operating income for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by 18.4 % as compared to 2012.This percent change in the generation segment operating income in 2013 varies in each of the five countries where we operate and is due to numerous factors, including hydrological conditions, the price of fuel used to generate thermal electricity, and the prevailing regulated and spot market prices for electricity. We expect our reasonably good operating performance to continue during the coming years, given the favorable macroeconomic perspective for all of the countries in which we operate, except for Argentina. Despite current uncertainties concerning the global economy, there are good expectations for this region’s growth during the next five years, including an expected 4.1 % growth in gross domestic product, on average, based on World Economic Outlook (October 2013) of the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”) and a stable electricity demand growth.

On the other hand, development of new generation facilities in South America has always lagged behind demand growth. We anticipate that this tendency will continue for the foreseeable future. Also, due to growing environmental restrictions, transmission line saturation, obstacles for fuel transportation, and scarcity of places where to locate plants, these new projects involve higher development costs than in the past. We expect that average

162

electricity prices will adjust to recognize these increased costs. This could increase the value of our assets, especially in the case of hydroelectric power plants, which have lower production costs, and thus have greater profitability in scenarios of increasing prices to end users. Furthermore, an important part of the new installed capacity under development in the five countries in which we operate corresponds to thermal power plants, with coal and natural gas as their principal fuels. Fewer hydroelectric projects are being developed. Thus, we expect this situation will also impact long term spot prices positively. Long term contracts awarded to Enersis’ subsidiaries in different bids have already incorporated these expected price levels. Currently, 37% of our expected annual generation is sold under contracts with terms of at least ten years and an additional 39% under contracts with terms of at least five years.

However, spot prices are subject to great volatility, affecting our forecasted income. In order to address this risk in the generation business, we have implemented commercial policies to control relevant variables and provide stability to the profit margins. Our commercial policy seeks to establish a global framework to conduct energy trading operations, setting responsibilities, guidelines and acceptable risk limits aligned with company objectives. Therefore, the Company defines contractual volumes that minimize the risk of supply in adverse hydrological conditions and includes risk mitigation clauses, where necessary with some unregulated customers.

In order to mitigate the risk of increasing fuel costs, we have entered into supply contracts to cover part of the fuel needed to operate the thermal generation units, which operate with coal, natural gas, diesel and fuel oil. In Chile, through an equity interest in GNL Quintero and GNL Chile, and a Long Term Gas Supply Agreement with GNL Chile, we are the only electricity company in Chile with direct access to the LNG terminal at Quintero Bay (the only facility of its kind in the SIC market). This enhances our position to manage fuel supply risks, especially when facing increasing fuel costs scenarios. This is becoming more important as there is an increasing trend to penalize fuel intensive technologies, such as coal and diesel, which have a larger environmental impact.

In July 2013, Endesa Chile and British Gas renegotiated the LNG Sale and Purchase Agreement, which had been in dispute since January 2013 due to a change in the reference price. This renegotiation has modified some conditions of the original contract, allowing us to secure our long term LNG supply at very competitive prices, with significant flexibilities and with an additional supply sufficient for our current power plants and future projects.

In addition, because of the drought in Chile and price volatility of coal and petroleum, we decided to hedge this risk with commodity instruments available in international markets. During 2013, we entered into swap arrangements for 107,000 barrels of Brent crude and 25,000 tons of coal. As of December 31, 2013, no swap arrangements were outstanding. We plan to continuously monitor operating conditions and, if necessary, entered into new swap arrangements.

With respect to our distribution business segment, our operating income for the year ended December 31, 2013, increased by 18.3% as compared to 2012. This increase is mainly explained by extraordinary revenues in Argentina due to regulations that recognized costs not incorporated in tariffs between 2007 and September 2013. We expect that the South American countries in which we operate will continue to experience high growth rates, positively impacting our distribution business performance. In particular, we expect growth rates in the electricity sector to continue, mainly due to the gap in the per capita electricity consumption that these countries have with respect to more developed countries. We estimate that electricity demand will grow approximately 4% annually, on average, over the next ten years, in the five countries in which we operate.

In connection with the distribution segment tariffs, and taking into account the future periodic review process in each country in which we operate, we expect that the regulators will continue to recognize investments, encourage efficiency, and establish prices that will allow for an appropriate return on our investment. We also anticipate that our distribution companies will probably increase their profitability during the period between periodic tariff setting processes, according to price cap tariff model, due to growth and economies of scale. After tariffs have been set, the companies have the opportunity to increase their efficiency, and obtain extra profits associated with such efficiencies, during the period subsequent to each new tariff setting. For a better understanding of the cycles in the process, please refer to the figure below, where we conceptually describe the effect of the application of the price cap model used by regulators in most of the countries where we operate.

163

Although the price at which a distribution company purchases the electricity has a substantial impact on the price at which it is sold to end users, it does not have an impact on our profitability. The cost of electricity purchased is passed through to end users. However, distribution companies usually enter into long-term contracts in order to decrease exposure to electricity price volatility. This is a common practice in most of the countries in which we operate distribution companies.

Although having operations in the five countries allows us to somewhat offset and counterbalance variations with respect to the main factors that can affect our operating results, we cannot claim that our portfolio of assets is fully hedged. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that past performance will be indicative of future performance with respect to our businesses. Any significant change with respect to hydrological conditions, fuel or electricity prices, among other factors, could affect our operating income in the generation business. More broadly, any significant change with respect to economic and population growth, as well as changes in the regulatory regimes in the countries in which we operate, among other factors, could affect our operating income in the distribution business. Variability in our earnings and cash flows can also arise from non-operating factors as well, such as foreign currency exchange rates. For further information regarding our 2013 results compared with those recorded in previous periods, please see “— A. Operating Results — Results of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012” and “— A. Operating Results — Results of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011”. Investors should not look at our past performance as indicative of future performance.

We do not expect that our current debt agreements, which impose certain restrictions, would have a negative impact on our capital expenditure plan and we have many sources of proven liquidity in the international and domestic capital markets. As of December 31, 2013, Enersis is able to incur up to Ch$ 4,114 billion in incremental debt, while Endesa Chile has an additional debt capacity of Ch$ 2,775 billion, without entering into a breach of the debt covenants, beyond current levels of consolidated indebtedness. We believe that Enersis will continue to have similar comfortable levels of leverage capacity for the foreseeable future. (See “ Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — B. Liquidity and Capital Resources”).

Finally, we expect that we will continue generating substantial operating cash, which can be used to finance a significant part of our capital expenditure plan. If needed, our shareholders can also decrease the dividend payout ratio, subject to certain minimum legal restrictions, in order to finance our investment plan and future growth.

E. Off-balance Sheet Arrangements.

Enersis is not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements.

164

F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations.

The table below sets forth the Company’s cash payment obligations as of December 31, 2013:

Ch$ billion	Total		2014		2015-2016		2017-2018		After 2018
Bank debt		385		164		58		97		66
Local bonds (1)		1,733		137		280		456		860
Yankee bonds (1)		989		296		326		—		367
Other debt (2)		424		216		84		72		52
Interest expense (3)		1,491		231		388		254		618
Pension and post-retirement obligations (4)		283		52		79		67		85
Purchase obligations (5)		23,936		2,090		3,499		3,106		15,241
Financial leases		112		16		31		27		38
Total contractual obligations		29,353		3,202		4,745		4,079		17,327

(1) Net value, hedging instruments included substantially modify the principal amount of debt.

(2) Other debt includes governmental loan facilities, supplier credits and short-term commercial paper among others.

(3) Interest expenses are the interest payments for all outstanding financial obligations, calculated as principal multiplied by the interest rate, presented according to when the interest payment comes due.

(4) We have funded and unfunded pension and post-retirement benefit plans. Our funded plans have contractual annual commitments for contributions, which do not change based on funding status. Cash flow estimates in the table are based on such annual contractual commitments including certain estimable variable factors such as interest. Cash flow estimates in the table relating to our unfunded plans are based on future discounted payments necessary to meet all of our pension and post-retirement obligations.

(5) Includes generation and distribution business purchase obligations which are comprised mainly of energy purchases, operating and maintenance contracts, and other services. Of the total contractual obligations of Ch$ 23,936 billion, 82% corresponds to energy purchased for distribution, 10% corresponds primarily to fuel supply, maintenance of medium and low voltage lines, supplies of cable and utility poles, and energy purchased for generation. The remaining 8% corresponds to miscellaneous services, such as LNG regasification, fuel transport and coal handling.

G. Safe Harbor.

The information contained in the Items 5.E and 5.F contains statements that may constitute forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” in the “Introduction” of this Report, for safe harbor provisions.

Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees

A. Directors and Senior Management.

Our Board of Directors consists of seven members who are elected for a three-year term at an Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting (“OSM”). If a vacancy occurs in the interim, the Board of Directors elects a temporary director to fill the vacancy until the next OSM, at which time the entire Board of Directors will be elected. Our Executive Officers are appointed by the Board of Directors and hold office at the discretion of the Board.

165

Set forth below are the members of our Board of Directors as of December 31, 2013.

Directors	Position		Held Since
Pablo Yrarrázaval V.		Chairman		2002
Borja Prado E.		Vice Chairman		2013
Andrea Brentan		Director		2009
Rafael Fernández M.		Director		2010
Luigi Ferraris.		Director		2013
Hernán Somerville S.		Director		1999
Leonidas Vial E.		Director		2010

Set forth below are brief biographical descriptions of our directors, four of whom reside in Chile, two in Spain and one in Italy, as of December 31, 2013.

Pablo Yrarrázaval V.

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Mr. Yrarrázaval became Chairman of the Board of Directors in April 2002 and was Chairman of the Directors’ Committee since April 2003 until January 2010. Mr. Yrarrázaval is a partner in the brokerage firm Corredora de Bolsa Yrarrázaval y Compañía Limitada, and is also Chairman of the Santiago Stock Exchange, a position he has held since 1989. Before Mr. Yrarrázaval became Chairman of Enersis, he was Chairman of Endesa Chile.

Borja Prado E.

Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors

Mr. Prado was elected Vice Chairman of Enersis in April 2013. Mr. Prado is Chairman of Endesa Spain and Chairman of Mediobanca for Iberia and Latin America. He is a director on the boards of Enel Energy Europe and Mediaset and he is a member of the Spanish Group of the Trilateral Commission. His professional career began in 1980 in Fomento de Comercio Exterior (Focoex). Since 1987, he has served as Chairman of Almagro Asesoramiento e Inversiones, S.A. Between 1989 and 1994, he served as a Vice Chairman of UBS in Spain. In 1995, he became Director of Rothschild Spain, where he worked for four years. Between 1999 and 2007, he worked for Lazard as Vice Chairman of the Spanish branch. From 2007 to 2009, he served as a director on the board of Endesa Spain . Mr. Prado studied Law at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain). He continued his studies in international relations and foreign trade at New York University and at the Philip Brothers firm.

Andrea Brentan

Director

Mr. Brentan has been a Director since 2009, and he served as Vice Chairman from 2009 to April 2013. Mr. Brentan has also been the CEO of Endesa Spain since July 2009. He was a research assistant at New York University from 1975 to 1977 and then held various positions at GIE, an Italian power plant contractor operating worldwide, until the beginning of 1991. From 1991 to 1999, he successively held the positions of CFO, General Manager and CEO at Sae Sadelmi, a Milan-based company belonging to the ABB Group which is engaged in power plant engineering, procurement, and construction, as well as electrical generation equipment manufacturing and service. From 2000 to 2002, he was the Head of the Worldwide Steam Power Plant Business at Alstom, based in Paris. He joined Enel in November 2002, where he held several positions in the company, including Head of Business Development and M&A unit of the International Division, Chairman of Viesgo S.A., Chairman of Enel North America, Enel Latin America and Slovenske Elektrarne, and Director of Enel Energy Europe. Until June 2009, he served as Director of the Iberian Peninsula and Latin American Division of Enel and Vice Chairman of the Board of Endesa Spain. Mr. Brentan received a degree in mechanical engineering from Politecnico di Milano (Italy) and holds a M.Sc. in Applied Sciences from New York University.

166

Rafael Fernández M.

Director, Member of the Directors’ Committee

Mr. Fernández was elected a Director of Enersis in April 2010. From 1997 to 2006, Mr. Fernández served as Chairman of the Board and Director of various Argentine electricity companies in the generation, transmission, distribution, and trading, as well as in natural gas production and transport companies. Before that, he was CEO of power generation companies. He also founded and was a member of the Academic Committee in the Masters Program in Electricity Business at ITBA (Argentina) until 2006, and from 2006 until December 2013, was a member of the Advisory Committee of the Development Department of Universidad Alberto Hurtado (Chile). Between 2002 and 2006, he was the Executive Director of the Gas and Energy Business division and member of the Board of Directors of Petrobras Energía—Argentina. Between 2006 and January 2010, he served as CEO and Director of Petrobras Chile Petrolera Ltda. Since October 2011, he has been Director of the Board of Australis Seafood S.A. and Chairman of the Committee, and from June 2010 to December 2013, he was CEO of Corporación de Capacitación y Empleo, a subsidiary of Sociedad de Fomento Fabril (SOFOFA). Mr. Fernández received a degree in civil industrial engineering from Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. He also carried out graduate studies at E.S.A.E. in the same university in 1988-1989, and the Advanced Management Program at Duke University in 2005.

Luigi Ferraris

Director

Mr. Ferraris was elected Director in April 2013. He joined Enel in 1999 as Chief Financial Officer of Eurogen, Elettrogen, and Interpower, the three generation companies transferred by Enel as a consequence of the Italian electricity market liberalization. Afterwards he held the positions of Head of Planning, Control, Administration and Services of the Infrastructure and Networks and Market Divisions, Group Controller and Vice President of the Administration, Planning and Control Area. Mr. Ferraris began his career at Price Waterhouse in 1988. Later he held several international managerial positions, working for leading industrial companies including Agusta, Piaggio VE and Sasib Beverage. From 1996 to 1999, he was Head of the Europe Control Area of Elsag Baley Process Automation, part of the Finmeccanica Group. He is currently CFO of the Enel SpA Group, Chairman of Enel Green Power SpA, Chairman of Enel Servizi Srl, and Enel Factor SpA. Moreover, he is a director of Endesa S.A., Enel Distribuzione SpA, Enel Produzione SpA, Enel Investment Holding BV and Fondazione Centro Studi Enel, and has served as a director of many of the Enel group subsidiaries. Until 2013, Mr. Ferraris was also Professor at the economics department of the Luiss Guido Carli University of Rome, teaching courses in business strategies. He previously taught courses in managerial accounting and controlling systems. Mr Ferraris has a degree in economics from the Università degli Studi di Genova.

Hernán Somerville S.

Director, Chairman of the Directors’ Committee

Mr. Somerville has been a Director since 1999. From 1983 to 1988, he was Director of the Central Bank of Chile, serving as Chief Debt Negotiator for Chilean public debt and private commercial bank debt. Mr. Somerville was the former Chairman of the Confederation of Production & Commerce in Chile. Since 1989, Mr. Somerville has been the Managing Director and Partner of Fintec, an investment, advisory and management company. He was the Chairman of the Chilean Association of Banks and Financial Institutions, and also was Chairman of the Latin American Federation of Banks. He is the Chairman of Transbank S.A., which manages credit and debit cards in Chile. He is also a Board Member of INACAP and Chairman of the Chilean Pacific Foundation. Mr. Somerville has a law degree from Universidad de Chile and studied Comparative Law at New York University Law School.

Leonidas Vial E.

Director, Member of the Directors’ Committee

Mr. Vial was elected a Director of Enersis in April 2010. He was Director of Endesa Chile from April 1995 until March 2010. Mr. Vial has been Vice Chairman of the Santiago Stock Exchange since June 1988, as well as a Director of Empresas Santa Carolina S.A., Compañía Industrial El Volcán S.A., Larraín Vial S.A., Chairman of Compañías CIC S.A. and Embotelladora Arica.

167

Executive Officers

Set forth below are our Executive Officers as of December 31, 2013, except as otherwise noted below.

Executive Officers	Position		Current Position Held         Since
Ignacio Antoñanzas A.		Chief Executive Officer		2006
Massimo Tambosco		Deputy Chief Executive Officer		2010
Eduardo Escaffi J.		Chief Financial Officer		2012
Marco Fadda		Planning and Control Officer		2013
Eduardo López M.		Procurement Officer		2010
Carlos Alberto Niño F.		Human Resources Officer		2010
Alain Rosolino		Internal Audit Officer		2012
Jaime Sánchez-Cano T.		Global Services Officer for Latin America		2013
Domingo Valdés P.		General Counsel		1999

Set forth below are brief biographical descriptions of our Executive Officers, all of whom reside in Chile:

Ignacio Antoñanzas A. was appointed CEO of Enersis in October 2006. He started his career as a commodities trader. He joined Endesa Spain in 1994, having mostly worked during his professional career in generation and corporate strategy areas. He was the CEO of Endesa Net Factory and Director of Endesa Italia. Until assuming his current position, he served as Deputy General Manager of Strategy for Endesa Spain. Since June 2009, he also serves as Executive Vice President at Endesa Spain in charge of Latin America. Mr. Antoñanzas holds a degree in mining engineering with a major in energy and fuels from the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (Spain).

Massimo Tambosco became Deputy Chief Executive Officer in October 2010. Between 2000 and 2009, he held several positions in finance, planning and control, corporate control and M&A for different Enel Group companies and business units. Previously, he was CFO of Ferrero de México and Administration Manager of Roca S.r.l in Italy. From March 2009 until his most recent appointment, he held the position of Deputy CFO of Endesa Spain. Mr. Tambosco holds a degree in business administration from the Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi di Milano (Italy), and attended Executive Programs in the Kellogg School of Management in Chicago and the Harvard Business School in Boston.

Eduardo Escaffi J. became the CFO of Enersis in August 2012, after serving as CFO of Endesa Chile for three years from October 2009. From 1999 to 2009, Mr. Escaffi served in the Finance and Risk departments of Endesa Spain. He had previously been the CFO of Enersis from July 1998 to August 1999. Prior to that, Mr. Escaffi was the CEO of an Argentine insurance company from 1992 to 1998. He also held the position of Technical and Financial Manager of the Santander Group’s life insurance company in Chile from 1989 to 1992. In 1989, he served as the Deputy Financial Officer of Compañía de Teléfonos de Chile. Between 1986 and 1988, he served as adviser to the United Nations Development Program in Venezuela. Mr. Escaffi has also held several positions in Chilean governmental entities such as ODEPLAN and the Ministry of the Interior. Mr. Escaffi received a degree in civil engineering from the Universidad de Chile, with a specialization in structural engineering, and a Senior Executive Programme degree from the London Business School.

Marco Fadda was appointed Planning and Control Officer of Enersis in April 2013. In 1998 he joined the Enel Group, and in 1999 he was promoted to head of Management Control at Enel Trade S.p.A. in the Administration, Finance and Group Control department, where he spent four years. He later joined the department of Planning and Control of the Generation & Energy Management (GEM Division) where he was assistant officer of Planning and Control of Power & Trading, Manager of Planning and Control of Energy Management, and in 2009 he was promoted to Manager of Planning and Control of the GEM Division. He has been a member and team coordinator on international projects with overall impact on the group. Mr. Fadda has a degree in economics from the University of Genoa (Italy) and received a masters in network business administration at the Polytechnic University of Milano (Italy).

168

Eduardo López M. was appointed Enersis’ Procurement Officer in June 2008. He joined the group in 1981 and served in several positions in the finance department at Chilectra until 1992. Between 1992 and 1995, he worked at Edesur where he served as Sales Director. He was also CEO of Diprel S.A., a former Enersis subsidiary, between 1996 and 2001. In 2002, he was appointed as Enersis’ Procurement Director and from 2004 until 2008 he held the same position at CAM. Mr. López received a degree in commercial engineering from Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (Chile).

Carlos Niño F. was appointed Enersis’ Human Resources Officer in December 2010. He joined the Enersis group in 1998, having held several positions as Human Resources Officer at different companies, including Codensa and Emgesa in Colombia and Chilectra in Chile. He was also appointed Endesa Latinoamérica Personnel Management Director in 2009. Previously, he was Personnel Director of Legis S.A. and Human Resources Officer of Colmena Salud, a health insurance company. Mr. Niño received a degree in law from Universidad Externado de Colombia and holds a M.Sc. in Labor and Social Security Law from the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (Colombia).

Alain Rosolino was appointed Internal Audit Officer in December 2012. He joined the Enel Group in 2003, havng held several positions in the audit area at Enel, Enel Romania, Enel Green Power, Enel Latin America, and from 2011 to 2012, at Enel EGP IBAL (Iberian Peninsula and Latin America). Mr. Rosolino holds a business administration degree from Luiss University (Italy).

Jaime Sánchez-Cano T. was appointed Global Services Officer for Latin America in August 2013. He joined the Endesa Group in 2000 as Deputy Technical Director of Social Welfare. In 2007, he was promoted to Director of Social Welfare and Economic Management of Human Resources. In 2009, in addition to the position of Director of Social Welfare, he was appointed Director of Security of the Endesa Group, a position he held until late 2013. His previous working experience was primarily in the field of insurance and pensions, having worked for companies such as AGF, El Corte Inglés, and BBVA, and developing technical work, counseling, consulting, and business development. Mr. Sánchez-Cano is insurance actuary and Fellow of the Institute of Spanish Actuaries. Mr. Sánchez-Cano holds a degree in Economics and Business Administration from the Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Spain).

Domingo Valdés P. has been General Counsel since May 1999. He joined the Enersis group as a corporate attorney for Chilectra in 1993 and became Legal Counsel at Enersis in December 1997. Mr. Valdés worked as an intern at the New York City law firms of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy and Chadbourne & Parke LLP. Before joining Chilectra, Mr. Valdés was a lawyer at Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., Corporate Department (Chile) and an associate at Carey & Cía., a Santiago based law firm. Mr. Valdés is also Secretary of the Enersis Board of Directors and a Professor of Economic and Antitrust Law at Universidad de Chile Law School. Mr. Valdés has a law degree from Universidad de Chile and a Master of Law Degree from the University of Chicago.

Daniel Horacio Martini M. was appointed Communications Officer in January 2014. He began his career as a journalist in the Argentine newspaperLa Razón. His experience in the power generation industry began at SEGBA, a company where he served as press head from 1989 to 1992. He joined the Enersis group in 1992 through Edesur, where he was in charge of the Communications Department, and promoted in 1999 to the position of Communications Officer. In 2008, Mr. Martini was appointed the Endesa group’s Director of Communications for Argentina. During his career, Mr. Martini has received numerous awards and recognitions from such entities as the Global Pact of the United Nations in Argentina and the Chamber of Commerce of the United States (AMCHAM), among others. Mr. Martini was a professor in private and public universities in Argentina between 2005 and 2013. Mr. Martini has a degree in journalism from the Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora (Argentina) and a Masters in Communication Management in Organizations from the Universidad Austral (Argentina).

B. Compensation.

At the OSM held on April 16, 2013, our shareholders approved the current compensation policy for the Board of Directors. Directors are paid a variable annual fee, depending on the Company’s net earnings at the rate of one peso per one thousand pesos of net earnings, and a monthly fee paid in advance, depending on their attendance at Board meetings and their participation as Director of any of our subsidiaries. These advances consist of a fixed compensation of UF 101 per month and a fee of UF 66 for attending meetings of the Board. The Chairman of the Board is entitled to double the compensation for a regular Director under this policy. In 2013, the total compensation paid to each of our Directors, including fees for attending Directors’ Committee meetings, was as follows:

169

	Year ended December 31, 2013
Director	Fixed Compensation		Ordinary Session		Extraordinary Session		Directors’ Committee		Total
	(in thousands of Ch$)
Pablo Yrarrázaval V.		55,759		36,426		18,137		—		110,323
Borja Prado E.		29,701		19,401		3,421		—		52,523
Hernán Somerville S.		27,880		16,689		9,069		16,276		69,914
Leonidas Vial E.		27,880		15,159		7,560		15,858		66,457
Rafael Fernández M.		27,880		18,213		9,069		16,691		71,853
Andrea Brentan (1).		—		—		—		—		—
Luigi Ferraris (1).		—		—		—		—		—
Rafael Miranda R. (2)		8,079		5,279		5,281		—		18,639
Eugenio Tironi B. (2)		8,079		5,279		6,788		—		20,146
Total		185,258		116,447		59,324		48,826		409,855

(1) Messrs. Brentan and Ferraris waived compensation for their positions as Directors.

(2) Messrs. Miranda and Tironi ceased to be Directors of Enersis in April 2013.

We do not disclose, to our shareholders or otherwise, information about an individual Executive Officer’s compensation. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the aggregate gross compensation paid or accrued, attributable to fiscal year 2013, including performance-based bonuses for the Executive Officers of Enersis, was Ch$ 2,522 million. Enersis’ Executive Officers are eligible for variable compensation under a bonus plan for meeting company–wide objectives and for their individual contribution to the Company’s results and objectives. The annual bonus plan provides for a range of bonus amounts according to seniority level. The bonuses paid to executives consist of a certain number of gross monthly salaries.

The amount accrued by the Company in 2013 to provide for pensions, retirement or similar benefits to our Executive Officers totaled Ch$ 355 million. The funds accrued to provide severance indemnity to our Executive Officers amounted to Ch$ 319 million, of which Ch$ 44 million was accrued during 2013. There are no other amounts set aside or accrued to provide for pension, retirement or similar benefits for our Executive Officers.

All of our Executive Officers have severance indemnity agreements with the Company in the event of voluntary resignation, termination by mutual agreement among the parties, or death. They do not have a right to severance indemnity if their relationship with the Company is terminated due to willful misconduct, prohibited negotiations, unjustified absences, abandonment of duties, among other causes, as defined in article 160 of the Chilean Code of Labor. All of the Company’s employees are entitled to legal severance pay if terminated due to the needs of the Company, as defined in article 161 of the Chilean Labor Code.

C. Board Practices.

The Board of Directors as of December 31, 2013 was elected at the OSM of April 16, 2013, and the term for this Board of Directors will expire in April 2016. For information as to the years in which each director began his service on the board, please see “— A. Directors and Senior Management” above. The members of the Board of Directors do not have service contracts with Enersis or any of its subsidiaries that provide benefits upon termination of service.

Corporate Governance

Enersis is managed by its Board of Directors, which, in accordance with its bylaws, consists of seven directors who are elected at an OSM. Each director serves for a three-year term and the term of each of the seven directors expires on the same day. The directors can be reelected indefinitely. Staggered terms are not permitted under Chilean law. If a vacancy occurs on the board during the three-year term, the Board of Directors may appoint a temporary director to fill the vacancy. Any vacancy triggers an election for every seat on the Board of Directors at the next OSM.

170

Chilean corporate law provides that a company’s board of directors is responsible for the management, administration and representation of a company in all matters concerning its corporate purpose, subject to the provisions of the company’s bylaws and the stockholders’ resolutions. In addition to the bylaws, the Enersis Board of Directors has adopted regulations and policies that guide our corporate governance principles.

The Charter Governing Executives, approved by our Board on May 28, 2003, and the Employee Code of Conduct, explain our principles and ethical values, establish the rules governing our contact with customers and suppliers, and establish the principles that should be followed by employees, including ethical conduct, professionalism and confidentiality. They also impose limitations on the activities that our executives and other employees may undertake outside the scope of their employment with us.

In order to ensure compliance with Securities Market Law 18,045 and SVS regulations, our Board of Directors at its meeting held on May 28, 2008, approved the “Manual for the Management of Information of Interest to the Market” (the “Manual”). This document addresses applicable standards regarding the information in connection with transactions of the Company’s securities or those of its affiliates by directors, management, principal executives, employees and other related parties, existence of blackout periods for such transactions by directors, principal executives and other related parties, existence of mechanisms for the continuous disclosure of information that is of interest to the market and mechanisms that provide protection for confidential information. The Manual was released to the market on May 30, 2008 and is posted on the Company’s website at www.enersis.cl. In February 2010, the Manual was modified in order to comply with the provisions of Law 20,382 (Corporate Governance Improvement Law).

The provisions of this Manual shall be applied to the members of our Board, as well as Enersis executives and employees who have access to confidential information, and especially those who work in areas related to the securities markets.

In order to supplement the aforementioned corporate governance regulations, our Board, at its meeting held on June 24, 2010 approved a Code of Ethics and a Zero Tolerance Anti-Corruption Plan (“ZTAC Plan”). The Code of Ethics is structured on the basis of general principles such as impartiality, honesty, integrity and other values of similar importance, which are expected in the behavior criteria detailed in the document. The ZTAC Plan reinforces the principles included in the Code of Ethics, but with special emphasis on avoiding corruption in the form of bribes, preferential treatment, and other similar matters.

At its meeting of March 29, 2011 our Board approved the Penal Risk Prevention Model required by Law 20,393 of December 2, 2009, which imposes criminal responsibility on legal entities for the crimes of asset laundering, financing of terrorism and bribing of public officials. The law encourages companies to adopt this model, whose implementation involves compliance with duties of management and supervision. The adoption of this model therefore mitigates, and in some cases relieves, the effects of criminal responsibility even when a crime is committed. One of the elements of this model is the Penal Risk Prevention Officer, who was appointed by the Board at its meeting held on October 27, 2010. As of December 31, 2013, our Penal Risk Prevention Officer was Alain Rosolino, Internal Audit Officer.

On October 27, 2010, our Board approved “GUIDELINES 231: Guidelines applicable to non-Italian subsidiaries in accordance with Legislative Decree 231 of June 8, 2001. Application to Endesa Spain and its Group”. Given that Enersis’ ultimate parent company, Enel S.p.A., has to comply with Legislative Decree 231, which establishes management responsibility for Italian companies as a consequence of certain crimes committed in Italy or abroad, in the name of or for the benefit of such entities, including those crimes described in Chilean Law 20,393, this document, approved by the Board, sets a group of measures, with standards of behavior expected from all employees, advisers, auditors, officials, directors as well as consultants, contractors, commercial partners, agents and suppliers. Legislative Decree 231 includes various activities of a preventive nature that are coherent with and integral to the requirements and compliance with Chilean Law 20,393, which deals with the criminal responsibility of legal entities. All of the above is supplementary to the behavioral regulations included in the Code of Ethics and ZTAC Plan.

171

On November 29, 2012, the SVS issued General Regulation No. 341 which established regulations for the disclosure of information with respect to the standards of corporate governance adopted by publicly held limited liability corporations that must be complied with, and set the procedures, mechanisms, and policies that are indicated in the Appendix to the regulation. The objective of this regulation is to provide credible information to the investing public with respect to good corporate governance policies and practices adopted by publicly held limited liability corporations, which include Enersis, and permit entities like stock exchanges to produce their own analyses to help the market participants to know and evaluate the commitment of companies. The Appendix is divided into the following five sections with respect to which companies must report the corporate practices that have been adopted: (i) the functioning of the board, (ii) relations between the company, shareholders, and the general public, (iii) the replacement and compensation of senior executives, (iv) the definition, implementation, and supervision of the company’s internal control, risk management policies, and procedures, and (v) other practices adopted by the company that do not refer to the above matters. Publicly held limited liability corporations should send the information with respect to corporate governance practices to the SVS, no later than March 31 of each year, using as parameters the contents of the Appendix to this regulation. Should the company not have adopted any of them, it must explain its reasons. The information should refer to December 31 of the calendar year prior to its dispatch. At the same time, such information shall also be made available to the public on the company’s web site and the information sent to the stock exchanges. The SVS directed that the first dispatch and publication of the information be made in June 2013 and refer to the period ended March 31, 2013, and Enersis made the dispatch in compliance with the SVS directions.

Compliance with the New York Stock Exchange Listing Standards on Corporate Governance

The following is a summary of the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and those applicable to U.S. domestic issuers under the corporate governance rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).

Independence and Functions of the Directors’ Committee (Audit Committee)

Under the NYSE corporate governance rules, all members of the audit committee must be independent. We have been subject to this requirement since July 31, 2005. On April 22, 2010, at an Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting (“ESM”), the Company’s bylaws were amended and the Audit Committee was merged with the Directors’ Committee. According to the Company’s bylaws, all of the members of this Committee must satisfy the requirements of independence as stipulated by the NYSE. Also, Chilean law requires that the majority of the Directors’ Committee (at least two out of three members) be independent directors. According to Chilean law, a member would not be considered independent if, at any time, within the last 18 months he or she: (i) maintained any relationship of a relevant nature and amount with the company, with other companies of the same group, with its controlling shareholder or with the principal officers of any of them or has been a director, manager, administrator or officer of any of them; (ii) maintained a family relationship with any of the members described in (i) above; (iii) has been a director, manager, administrator or principal officer of a non-profit organization that has received contributions from (i) above; (iv) has been a partner or a shareholder that has controlled, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the capital stock or has been a director, manager, administrator or principal officer of an entity that has provided consulting or legal services for a relevant consideration or external audit services to the persons listed in (i) above; and (v) has been a partner or a shareholder that has controlled, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the capital stock or has been a director, manager, administrator or principal officer of the principal competitors, suppliers or customers. In case there are not sufficient independent directors on the Board to serve on the Directors’ Committee, Chilean law determines that the independent director nominates the rest of the members of the Directors’ Committee among the rest of the Board members that do not meet the Chilean law independence requirements. Chilean law also requires that all publicly held limited liability stock corporations that have a market capitalization of at least UF 1,500,000 (approximately Ch$ 35 billion as of December 31, 2013) and at least 12.5% of its voting shares are held by shareholders that individually control or own less than 10% of such shares, must have at least one independent director and a Directors’ Committee.

Under the NYSE corporate governance rules, the audit committee of a U.S. company must perform the functions detailed in, and otherwise comply with the requirements of NYSE Listed Company Manual Rules 303A.06 and 303A.07. Non-U.S. companies have been required to comply with Rule 303A.06 beginning July 31, 2005 but are not required to comply with Rule 303A.07. Since July 31, 2005, we have complied with the independence and the functional requirements of Rule 303A.06. As required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”) and the NYSE corporate governance rules, on June 29, 2005, Enersis’ Board of Directors created an Audit

172

Committee, composed of three directors who were also members of the Board. As previously mentioned, this Audit Committee was merged into the Directors’ Committee in April 2010. As required by the Company’s bylaws, the members of Directors’ Committee, composed of three members of the Board, should comply with Chilean law, as well as with the criteria and requirements of independence prescribed by SOX, the SEC and the NYSE. As of December 31, 2013, our Directors’ Committee was composed of three independent directors, all of whom met the independence criteria of Chilean law, SOX, the SEC and the NYSE.

Our Directors’ Committee performs the following functions:

• review of Financial Statements and the Reports of the external auditors prior to their submission to shareholders’ approval;

• formulation of the proposal to the Board of Directors, which will make its own proposals to shareholders’ meetings, for the selection of external auditors and private rating agencies;

• review of information related to transactions of the Company with related parties and report the opinion of the Directors’ Committee to the Board of Directors;

• examination of the compensation framework and plans for managers, executive officers and employees;

• preparation of an Annual Management Report, including its main recommendations to shareholders;

• information to the Board of Directors about the convenience of recruiting external auditors to provide non-auditing services, when such services are not prohibited by law, depending on whether such services might affect the external auditors’ independence;

• oversight of the work of external auditors;

• review and approval of the annual auditing plan by the external auditors;

• evaluation of the qualifications, independence and quality of the auditing services;

• elaboration of policies regarding employment of former members of the external auditing firm;

• review and discussion of problems or disagreements between management and external auditors regarding the auditing process;

• establishment of procedures for receiving and dealing with complaints regarding accounting, internal control and auditing matters;

• any other function mandated to the committee by the bylaws, the Board of Directors or the shareholders of the Company.

As of December 31, 2013, Messrs. Leonidas Vial, Rafael Fernández and Hernán Somerville (Chairman) were members of this committee, all of whom satisfied the independence requirements of the NYSE.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The NYSE’s corporate governance rules require U.S.-listed companies to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. Although Chilean law does not provide for this practice (except for the Manual), the Company has adopted the codes of conduct described above, and at its ESM held in March 2006, approved the inclusion of articles in its bylaws that govern the creation, composition, attributions, functions and compensation of the Directors’ Committee and the Audit Committee.

173

In order to comply with the new requirements of Law No. 20,382, which amended the Chilean Companies Act, at the ESM held on April 22, 2010, the shareholders of the Company approved amendments to the Company’s bylaws, including amendments providing for the merger of the Directors’ and Audit Committees. The Directors’ Committee is currently composed of three members that comply with the SOX independence requirements and the NYSE corporate governance rules. The Directors’ Committee includes among its functions the duties previously performed by the Audit Committee.

D. Employees.

The following table provides the total number of personnel (both permanent and temporary) of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries for the last three fiscal years:

Company	2013		2012		2011
Argentina
Endesa Costanera		481		452		421
El Chocón		48		49		52
Edesur		3,320		2,948		2,849
Cemsa		31		—		—
Dock Sud (1)		68		—		—
Total personnel in Argentina		3,948		3,449		3,322
Brazil
Cachoeira Dourada		71		69		69
Endesa Fortaleza		68		68		72
CIEN (2)		66		65		61
Ampla (3)		1,169		1,158		1,208
Coelce		1,234		1,244		1,309
Endesa Brasil		69		58		47
Total personnel in Brazil		2,677		2,662		2,766
Chile
Endesa Chile		1,137		1,102		1,077
Pehuenche		3		3		3
Celta		1		1		1
Ingendesa (4)		—		1		3
Túnel El Melón		16		16		16
Enersis		357		326		318
Chilectra (5)		745		734		712
ICT Servicios Informáticos		111		111		106
Other businesses (6)		42		39		35
Total personnel in Chile (7)		2,412		2,333		2,271
Colombia (7)
Emgesa		563		517		498
Codensa		1,036		1,004		985
Total personnel in Colombia		1,599		1,521		1,483
Peru
Edegel		260		263		247
Edelnor		616		607		550
EEPSA (1)		56		—		—
Generalima		6		—		—
Total personnel in Peru		938		870		797
Total personnel of Enersis and Subsidiaries		11,574		10,835		10,639

(1) As a result of the 2013 capital increase, Enersis began accounting for Dock Sud and EEPSA on a consolidated basis as of April 1, 2013.

(2) Includes employees of TESA and CTM who work in Argentina.

(3) Includes En-Brasil Comercio e Serviços S.A.

(4) Includes employees of Ingendesa’s subsidiary in Brazil. During 2011, Ingendesa employees were transferred to Endesa Chile.

(5) Includes Luz Andes S.A. and Empresa Eléctrica de Colina S.A.

(6) Includes IMV, Maitenes and Aguas Santiago Poniente.

(7) Through December 31, 2012, our jointly controlled companies GasAtacama and HidroAysén in Chile and Distribuidora Eléctrica de Cundinamarca S.A. in Colombia were consolidated on a proportional basis, so for those companies we included personnel accordingly. Since January 1, 2013, jointly controlled companies have been consolidated under the equity method as a result of the application of IFRS 11. For comparative purposes we have subtracted the personnel of those companies from the 2011 and 2012 figures.

174

The following table provides the total temporary employees at the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries for the last three fiscal years:

Company	Average 2013		2013		2012		2011
Argentina
Endesa Costanera		9.1		20		—		55
El Chocón		0.8		3		—		3
Edesur		8.2		8		8		18
Cemsa		1.2		3		—		—
Dock Sud (1)		5.5		6		—		—
Total temporary personnel in Argentina		24.8		40		8		76
Brazil
Cachoeira Dourada		—		—		—		—
Endesa Fortaleza		—		—		—		—
CIEN (2)		1.7		2		1		1
Ampla (3)		—		—		—		—
Coelce		—		—		—		1
Endesa Brasil		—		—		—		—
Total temporary personnel in Brazil		1.7		2		1		2
Chile
Endesa Chile		111.2		96		75		74
Pehuenche		—		—		—		—
Celta		—		—		—		—
Túnel El Melón		—		—		—		—
Enersis		2.8		4		—		1
Chilectra (4)		0.4		1		—		—
ICT Servicios Informáticos		—		—		—		—
Total temporary personnel in Chile		114.4		101		75		75
Colombia
Emgesa		84.7		87		76.0		57
Codensa		33.1		36		31.0		4
Total temporary personnel in Colombia		117.8		123		107		61
Peru
Edegel		25.9		22		27		17
Edelnor		66.8		63		68		47
EEPSA (1)		5.4		2		—		—
Generalima		3.3		4		—		—
Total temporary personnel in Peru		101.4		91		95		64
Total temporary personnel of Enersis and Subsidiaries		360.1		357		286		278

(1) As a result of the 2013 capital increase, Enersis began accounting for Dock Sud and EEPSA on a consolidated basis as of April 1, 2013.

(2) Includes employees of TESA and CTM who work in Argentina.

(3) Includes En-Brasil Comercio e Serviços S.A.

(4) Includes Luz Andes S.A. and Empresa Eléctrica de Colina S.A.

175

Chile

All Chilean employees who are dismissed for reasons other than misconduct are entitled by law to a severance payment. According to Chilean law, permanent employees are entitled to a basic payment of one-month’s salary for each year (or a six-month portion thereof) worked, subject to a limit of a total payment of no more than 11 months’ pay for employees hired after August 14, 1981. Severance payments to employees hired prior to that date consist of one-month’s salary for each full year worked, not subject to any limitation on the total amount payable. Under Endesa Chile’s collective bargaining agreements, the Company is obligated to make severance payments to all covered employees in cases of voluntary resignation or death in specified amounts that increase according to seniority.

Enersis has two collective bargaining agreements, both signed during 2011, which will be in force until July and December 2015. Chilectra has five collective bargaining agreements, all of them signed in 2012, which expire in December 2016. Empresa Eléctrica de Colina has one collective bargaining agreement, signed in 2011, which expires in October 2015. ICT has one agreement which expires in December 2015. Endesa Chile has four collective bargaining agreements in Chile, which will expire between 2015 and 2017.

Argentina

Edesur has two collective bargaining agreements which expired in March 2014. El Chocón has two collective bargaining agreements, one which expires in December 2016, and another which expired and is still in the process renegotiation. Endesa Costanera has two collective bargaining agreements, which expired in March 2014. By law, collective agreements are renewed automatically until a new agreement is reached, which is estimated that will occur in 2014.

The result of collective bargaining agreements is subject to the result of the negotiations between the government and trade union federations, with regards to wage increases and the incorporation of contracted workers into the workforce of the companies.

Brazil

Ampla has five collective bargaining agreements, four of which will expire in 2015 and one that is currently being renegotiated. Coelce has two collective bargaining agreements which will be in force until October 2014. CIEN has two agreements which will expire in 2015. Cachoeira Dourada has two collective bargaining agreements, one that will expire in April 2014 and the other which will expire in September 2015. Endesa Fortaleza has two collective bargaining agreements, one that will expire in 2015 and another which expired in September 2013 and is currently being negotiated.

Under Brazilian law, collective bargaining agreements cannot last for more than two years.

Colombia

Codensa and Emgesa have collective bargaining agreements with Sintraelecol which will be in force until December 2014. EEC’s collective bargaining agreement expired in August 2010 and is being renegotiated. Additionally, the Supreme Court of Justice approved the collective bargaining agreement executed by the Court of Arbitration regarding the negotiation between the Engineers Association of the Bogota Electric Company (“ASIEB” in its Spanish acronym) and Emgesa, which will be in force until October 2014. A ruling is expected in 2014 on the negotiation between ASIEB and Codensa.

Peru

Edelnor has four collective bargaining agreements, which expire in December 2014. Edegel has one collective bargaining agreement signed in 2009, which is currently in the process of renegotiation.

Enersis management believes that it has a good relationship with its labor unions.

176

E. Share Ownership.

To the best of the Company’s knowledge, none of Enersis’ directors or officers own more than 0.1% of the shares of the Company. None of Enersis’ directors and officers have any stock options. It is not possible to confirm whether any of our directors or officers has a beneficial, rather than direct, interest in the shares of Enersis. To the best of our knowledge, any share ownership by all of the directors and officers of Enersis, in the aggregate, amounts to significantly less than 10% of our outstanding shares.

Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

A. Major Shareholders.

Enersis has only one class of capital stock and Endesa Spain, our controlling shareholder, has no different voting rights than Enersis’ other shareholders. As of February 28, 2014, our 49,092,772,762 shares of common stock outstanding were held by 7,185 stockholders of record. There were seven record holders of our ADSs as of such date.

It is not practicable for us to determine the number of ADSs or common shares beneficially owned in the United States, as the depositary only has knowledge of the record holders, including the Depositary Trust Company and its nominees. As such, we are not able to ascertain the domicile of the final beneficial holders represented by the seven ADS record holders. Likewise, we cannot readily determine the domicile of any of our foreign stockholders who hold our common stock, either directly or indirectly.

In June 2012, Endesa Spain proposed a capital increase in which it would carry out the In-kind Contribution of all of its interests in Cono Sur, a wholly owned subsidiary that held direct and indirect equity interests in twenty-five companies in the five South American countries in which Enersis operates. The rest of the shareholders would contribute their proportional participation in cash. The SVS defined the transaction as a “related-party transaction”.

Endesa Spain and the Chilean private pension funds (AFPs) reached an agreement that valued Endesa Spain’s In-Kind Contribution at US$ 3,615 million, with 16,441,606,297 common shares to be issued at a subscription price of Ch$ 173 per common share. This was crucial for obtaining approval at the ESM on December 20, 2012.

In February 2013, Enersis began a pre-emptive offering pursuant to the Capital Increase, and was finalized on March 28, 2013, acquiring the Cono Sur assets and the rest of the shareholders contributed US$ 2.4 billion.

As of February 28, 2014, Endesa Spain beneficially owned 60.6% of the shares of Enersis. Chilean private pension funds, (AFPs), owned 12.78 % in the aggregate. Chilean stockbrokers, mutual funds, insurance companies, foreign equity funds, and other Chilean institutional investors collectively held 13.54 % of our equity. ADSs holders owned 10.78 %, and the remaining 2.28 % was held by 6,995 minority shareholders.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning ownership of the common stock as of February 28, 2014 with respect to each stockholder known to us to own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock:

	Number of Shares Owned		Percentage of Shares Outstanding
Endesa Latinoamérica (1)		19,794,583,473		40.3%
Endesa Spain		9,967,630,058		20.3%

(1)   Endesa Latinoamérica is wholly owned by Endesa Spain.

Since June 25, 2009, Enel has been the ultimate controlling shareholder of Enersis by virtue of its 92.1% shareholding in Endesa Spain. Enel publicly trades on the Milan Stock Exchange, is headquartered in Italy and primarily engaged in the energy sector, with a presence in 40 countries worldwide, and approximately 99 GW of net installed capacity. It provides service to more than 61 million customers through its electricity and gas businesses.

177

B. Related Party Transactions.

Article 146 of Law 18,046 (the “Chilean Companies Act”) defines related-party transactions as all operations involving the company and any entity belonging to the corporate group, its parent companies, controlling companies, subsidiaries or related companies, board members, managers, administrators, senior officers or company liquidators, including their spouses, some of their relatives and all entities controlled by them, in addition to individuals who may appoint at least one member of the company’s board of directors or who control 10% or more of voting capital, or companies in which a board member, manager, administrator, senior officer or company liquidator has been serving in the same position within the last 18 months. The law establishes that in the event that these persons fulfill the requirements established by Article 146, such persons must immediately inform the Board of Directors of their related-party nature or such other group as the Board may appoint for that purpose. As required by law, “related-party transactions” must comply with corporate interests, as well as prices, terms and conditions prevailing in the market at the time of their approval. They must also meet all legal requirements, including acknowledgement and approval of the transaction by the board (excluding the affected directors), by the ESM (in some cases, with requisite majority approval) and by any applicable regulatory procedures.

The aforementioned law, which also applies to Enersis’ affiliates, also provides for some exceptions, stating that in certain cases, Board approval would suffice for “related-party transactions, “ pursuant to certain related—party transaction thresholds and when such transactions are conducted in compliance with the related-party policies defined by the company’s board. At its meetings held on December 17, 2009 and April 23, 2010, Enersis’ Board of Directors approved a related-party policy (política de habitualidad) effective as of January 1, 2010. This policy is available on the company’s website.

If an operation is not in compliance with Article 146, this would not affect the operation’s validity, but the company or shareholders may demand compensation from the individual associated with the infringement as provided under law, and to reparation for damages. We believe that we have complied with the requirements of Article 146 in all transactions with related parties.

It is our policy that all cash inflows and outflows of our Chilean subsidiaries be managed through our centralized cash management policy. It is a common practice in Chile to transfer surplus funds from one company to another affiliate that has a cash deficit. These operations are carried out through either short-term loans or through structured inter-company loans. Under Chilean laws and regulations, such transactions must be carried out on an arm’s-length basis. Our centralized cash management is more efficient for both financial and tax reasons. All of these operations are subject to the supervision of our Directors’ Committee. As of December 31, 2013, these operations were priced at TIP (a Chilean variable interest rate) + 0.05% per month.

In other countries in which we do business, these inter-company transactions are permitted, but they have adverse tax consequences. Accordingly, we do not similarly manage the cash flows of our non-Chilean subsidiaries.

Our subsidiary, Endesa Chile, has made structured loans to its related parties in Chile, primarily to finance projects. As of December 31, 2013, the outstanding net balance for such loans was US$ 28.25 million, at an interest rate of 3.5% per annum. The largest amounts outstanding during 2013 and 2012 were US$ 28.25 million and US$ 38.5 million respectively. For the two-year period ending December 31, 2013, Endesa Chile has granted only one loan to a foreign subsidiary, Endesa Costanera, at a spread of 6.0% over LIBOR. This loan ended in November 2013, because it was contributed to Endesa Costanera in connection with its capital increase.

During 2013, Enersis made two structured loans to Endesa Chile, primarily to finance projects. As of December 31, 2013, the outstanding net balance for such loans was Ch$ 194 billion, composed of a Ch$ 67 billion loan with a fixed interest rate of 6.36% of which Ch$ 31.5 billion was repaid in January 2014 and Ch$ 35.5 billion was repaid in March 2014, and a second loan for Ch$ 127 billion at fixed interest rate of 5.99% repaid in March 2014.

As of the date of this Report, the abovementioned transactions have not experienced material changes. For more information regarding transactions with related parties, refer to Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

178

C. Interests of Experts and Counsel.

Not applicable.

Item 8. Financial Information

A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information.

See “Item 18. Financial Statements” for our consolidated financial statements.

Legal Proceedings

We and our subsidiaries are parties to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe it is unlikely that any loss associated with pending lawsuits will significantly affect the normal development of our business.

For detailed information as of December 31, 2013 on the status of the material pending lawsuits that have been filed against the Company or its subsidiaries, please refer to Note 35.3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. In 2009, the Company adopted IFRS, and in relation to the legal proceedings reported in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company decided to use the criteria of disclosing lawsuits above a minimum threshold of US$ 20 million of potential impact to Enersis, and, in some cases, qualitative criteria according to the materiality of the impact in the conduct of our business. The lawsuit status includes a general description, the process status and the estimate of the amount involved in each lawsuit.

Dividend Policy

The Board generally establishes a definitive dividend payable each year, and attributable to the prior year, which cannot be less than the legal minimum of 30% of annual net income before negative goodwill amortization. As agreed at a meeting held on February 28, 2014, the Board of Directors will propose to the OSM that is expected to be held on April 23, 2014, the payment of a definitive dividend of Ch$ 5.27719 per share for fiscal year 2013, equal to a payout ratio of 50% (based on annual net income before negative goodwill amortization). The provisional dividend of Ch$ 1.42964 per share paid on January 31, 2014 will be deducted from the definitive dividend to be paid on May 16, 2014.

The Board of Directors also approved a dividend policy for fiscal year 2014, according to which a provisional dividend will be paid to stockholders equal to 15% of the net income accumulated through September 30, 2014. The Board of Directors will propose a definitive dividend payout equal to 50% of the annual net income for fiscal year 2014. Actual dividend payments will be subject to net profits obtained in each period, as well as to expectations of future profit levels and other conditions that may exist at the time of such dividend declaration. The fulfillment of the aforementioned dividend policy will depend on actual 2014 net income. The proposed dividend policy is subject to the Board of Director’s prerogative to change the amount and timing of the dividends under the circumstances at the time of the payment.

Currently, there are no restrictions on the ability of Enersis or any of its subsidiaries to pay dividends, other than certain legal restriction of limiting the amount of dividend distributions and in the event of specific circumstances under certain credit agreements including, Endesa Costanera, El Chocón, and Endesa Fortaleza may not pay dividends unless they comply with certain financial covenants. In general terms, companies may not pay dividends in case of default on credit agreements. (See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — B. Liquidity and capital resources” for further detail on Enersis debt instruments).

Stockholders set dividend policies at each subsidiary and affiliate. There are currently no material currency controls which prohibit Enersis from repatriating the dividend payments from its non-Chilean principal subsidiaries and affiliates.

179

The Company pays dividends to shareholders of record as of five business days before the payment date. Holders of ADS on the applicable record dates will be entitled to participate in all future dividends.

Dividends

The table below sets forth, for each of the years indicated, the per share amounts of dividends distributed by the Company in Chilean pesos and the amount of dividends distributed per ADS (one ADS = 50 shares of common stock) in U.S. dollars. See “Item 10. Additional Information — D. Exchange Controls”.

Year	Nominal Ch$(1)		US$ per ADS (2)
2013		4.25		0.41
2012		5.75		0.60
2011		7.45		0.72
2010		4.64		0.50
2009		7.02		0.69

(1) This chart details dividends paid any given year, and not the dividends accrued in that year. These dividends may have been accrued during the prior year or the same year in which they were paid. These amounts do not reflect reduction for any applicable Chilean withholding tax.

(2) The U.S. dollar per ADS amount has been calculated by applying the exchange rate for December 31 of each year, to the Chilean peso amount. One ADS = 50 shares of common stock.

For a discussion of Chilean withholding taxes and access to the formal currency market in Chile in connection with the payment of dividends and sales of ADSs and the underlying common stock, see “Item 10. Additional Information — E. Taxation” and “Item 10. Additional Information — D. Exchange Controls”.

B. Significant Changes.

None.

180

Item 9.     The Offer and Listing

A. Offer and Listing Details.

Market Price Information

The shares of our common stock currently trade on Chilean, United States and Spanish exchanges.

The table below shows, for the periods indicated, high and low prices in Chilean pesos on the Santiago Stock Exchange, and high and low closing prices of the ADSs in U.S. dollars as reported by the NYSE.

	Santiago Stock Exchange (1)				U.S. Stock Exchanges (2)
	Ch$ per share				US$ per ADS
	High		Low		High		Low
2014		171.85		143.00		15.55		13.08
March		171.85		155.00		15.55		13.56
February		164.00		146.10		14.81		13.08
January		164.00		143.00		15.21		13.11
2013		188.00		148.00		19.97		14.39
December		166.00		153.00		15.64		15.06
November		171.50		155.50		16.77		15.75
October		172.40		161.78		17.22		16.69
September		173.77		156.80		17.66		16.45
4th Quarter		172.40		153.00		17.22		14.57
3rd Quarter		173.77		151.00		17.66		14.72
2nd Quarter		183.00		148.00		19.56		14.39
1st Quarter		188.00		173.00		19.97		18.25
2012		203.50		150.10		20.87		15.50
4th Quarter		176.00		154.00		18.46		16.16
3rd Quarter		195.74		150.10		19.98		15.50
2nd Quarter		201.88		171.50		20.84		17.00
1st Quarter		203.50		171.50		20.87		17.42
2011		221.10		169.00		23.48		15.81
4th Quarter		200.00		169.00		20.32		15.81
3rd Quarter		217.50		170.01		23.48		16.47
2nd Quarter		219.30		192.00		23.31		20.32
1st Quarter		221.10		180.00		23.40		18.87
2010		245.00		195.00		25.42		17.50

(1) Source: Santiago Stock Exchange.

(2) Source: NYSENET. Enersis’ ADS composite figures include transactions in all U.S. stock exchanges. One ADS = 50 shares of common stock.

On the last trading day in 2013, the common stock closed at Ch$ 157.60 per share on the Santiago Stock Exchange and the ADS closed at US$ 14.99 on the NYSE.

On March 31, 2014, the common stock closed at Ch$ 170.43 per share on the Santiago Stock Exchange and the ADS closed at US$ 15.53 on the NYSE.

On December 20, 2012, our shareholders approved an increase in our authorized capital through the issuance of 16,441,606,297 additional shares of common stock at a subscription price of Ch$ 173.00 per share (or US$ 19.19 per ADS) in connection with the Capital Increase. For more information regarding the Capital Increase, please see “Introduction — Recent Developments”.

181

B. Plan of Distribution.

Not applicable.

C. Markets.

In Chile, the Company’s stock is traded on three stock exchanges: the Santiago Stock Exchange, the Electronic Stock Exchange and the Valparaíso Stock Exchange. The largest exchange in the country, the Santiago Stock Exchange, was established in 1893 as a private company. Its equity consists of 48 shares held by 44 stockholders as of the date of this Report. As of December 31, 2013, 227 companies had shares listed on the Santiago Stock Exchange. For the year ended 2013, the Santiago Stock Exchange accounted for 87.2% of Enersis’ total equity traded in Chile and amounted to 8,074,364,433 shares. In addition, approximately 12.3% of Enersis’ equity trading was conducted on the Electronic Stock Exchange, an electronic trading market that was created by banks and non-member brokerage houses, and 0.5% was traded on the Valparaíso Stock Exchange.

Equities, closed-end funds, fixed-income securities, short-term and money market securities, gold and U.S. dollars are traded on the Santiago Stock Exchange. The Santiago Stock Exchange also trades U.S. dollar futures and stock index futures. Securities are traded primarily through an open voice auction system; a firm offers system or the daily auction. Trading through the open voice system occurs on each business day from 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., during local standard time, and from 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. during daylight savings time, which differs from New York City time by up to two hours, depending on the season. The Santiago Stock Exchange has an electronic trading system calledTelepregón, which operates continuously from 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. during local standard time, and from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. during daylight savings time, on each business day. During local standard time, electronic auctions may be conducted four times a day, at 10:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m., 1:30 p.m., and 3:30 p.m. During daylight savings time there is an additional electronic auction at 4:30 p.m. More than 99% of the auctions and transactions take place electronically.

There are two share price indexes on the Santiago Stock Exchange, the General Shares Price Index, or IGPA, and the Selected Shares Price Index, or IPSA. The IGPA is calculated using the prices of shares that are traded at least 5% of the trading days of a year, with a total annual transactions exceeding UF 10,000 (Ch$ 231 million as of December 31, 2013) and a free float of at least 5%. The IPSA is calculated using the prices of the 40 shares with highest amounts traded, on a quarterly basis, and with a market capitalization above US$ 200 million and a free float at least 5%. The shares included in the IPSA and IGPA are weighted according to the weighted value of the shares traded. Enersis has been included in the IPSA since the last quarter of 1988, while Endesa Chile has been included since its privatization process in 1987.

Shares of our common stock have traded in the United States in the form of ADSs on the NYSE and Over the Counter (“OTC”) since October 1993, under the ticker symbol “ENI”. Each ADS represents 50 shares of common stock, with the ADSs in turn evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”). The ADRs are outstanding under the Third Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated as of March 28, 2013 among us, Citibank, N.A. as Depositary, and the holders and beneficial owners from time to time of ADRs issued thereunder. Only persons in whose names ADRs are registered on the books of the Depositary are treated by the Depositary as owners of ADRs.

As of March 31, 2014, ADRs evidencing 104,738,095 (equivalent to 5,236,904,750 shares of common stock) were outstanding, representing 10.66 % of the total number of outstanding shares. It is not practicable for the Company to determine the proportion of ADSs beneficially owned by U.S. final beneficial holders. Trading of our shares on the NYSE and other exchanges during 2013 amounted to approximately 167 million ADS, which in turn was equivalent to US$ 2,895 million.

The NYSE is open for trading Monday through Friday from 9:30 am to 4:00 pm, with the exception of holidays declared by the NYSE in advance. On the trading floor, the NYSE trades in a continuous auction format, where traders can execute stock transactions on behalf of investors. Specialist brokers act as auctioneers in an open outcry auction market to bring buyers and sellers together and to manage the actual auction. Customers can also send orders for immediate electronic execution, or route orders to the floor for trade in the auction market. The NYSE works with U.S. regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) to coordinate risk management measures in the electronic trading environment through the implementation of mechanisms like circuit breakers and liquidity replenishment points.

182

Shares of Enersis were first listed and began trading on the Bolsa de Valores Latinoaméricanos de la Bolsa de Madrid (“Latibex”), as of December 2001, under the ticker symbol “XENI”. Until April 2011, the trading unit represented 50 shares of common stock (the same unit conversion of 50:1 as an ADS), but since May 2011 the equivalence changed to a 1:1 ratio. Santander Investment S.A. acts as the liaison entity, and Banco Santander-Chile as the Depositary Bank in Chile. Trading of our shares on the Latibex during 2013 amounted to approximately 6.9 million units, which in turn was equivalent to € 1.7 million. The stock closed at € 0.22 on the last 2013 trading day.

The following table contains information regarding the amount of total traded shares of common stock and the corresponding percentage per market during 2013:

	Number of shares of     common stock		Percentage
Market
Chile (1)		9,263,149,937		52.5%
United States (One ADS = 50 shares of common stock) (2)		8,361,479,100		47.4%
Spain (3)		6,922,507		0.0%
Total		17,631,551,544		100.0%

(1) Includes Santiago Stock Exchange, Electronic Stock Exchange and Valparaíso Stock Exchange.

(2) Includes the New York Stock Exchange and over-the-counter trading.

(3) Latibex.

For further information see “Item 9. The Offer and Listing — A. Offer and Listing Details — Market Price Information”.

D. Selling Shareholders.

Not applicable.

E. Dilution.

Not applicable.

F. Expense of the Issue.

Not applicable.

Item 10.     Additional Information

A. Share Capital.

Not applicable.

B. Memorandum and Articles of Association.

Description of Share Capital

Set forth below is certain information concerning our share capital and a brief summary of certain significant provisions of our bylaws and Chilean law.

183

General

Shareholders’ rights in Chilean companies are governed by the company’s bylaws, which serve the same purpose as the articles or certificate of incorporation and the bylaws of a company incorporated in the United States, and by Law 18,046 (the Chilean Companies Act). In addition, D.L. 3500, or the Pension Funds’ System Law, which permits the investment by Chilean pension funds in stock of qualified companies, indirectly affects corporate governance and prescribes certain rights of shareholders. In accordance with the Chilean Companies Act, legal actions by shareholders to enforce their rights as shareholders of the company must be brought in Chile in arbitration proceedings or, at the option of the plaintiff, before Chilean courts. Members of the board of directors, managers, officers and principal executives of the company, or shareholders that individually own shares with a book value or stock value higher that UF 5,000 (Ch$ 116 million as of December 31, 2013) do not have the option to bring the procedure to the courts.

The Chilean securities markets are principally regulated by the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance, or SVS, under Law 18,045 (the Securities Market Law) and the Chilean Companies Act. These two laws provide for disclosure requirements, restrictions on insider trading and price manipulation, and protection of minority shareholders. The Securities Market Law sets forth requirements for public offerings, stock exchanges and brokers, and outlines disclosure requirements for companies that issue publicly offered securities. The Chilean Companies Act and the Securities Market Law, both as amended, provide rules regarding takeovers, tender offers, transactions with related parties, qualified majorities, share repurchases, directors’ committee, independent directors, stock options and derivative actions.

Public Register

Enersis is a publicly held stock corporation incorporated under the laws of Chile. Enersis was constituted by public deed issued on June 19, 1981 by the Santiago Notary Public, Mr. Patricio Zaldívar M. Its existence was approved by SVS Resolution 409-S of July 17, 1981 and it was registered on July 21, 1981 in the Commercial Registrar (Registro de Comercio del Conservador de Bienes Raíces y Comercio de Santiago), on pages 13099 No. 7269. Enersis is registered with the SVS and its entry number is 0175. Enersis is also registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and its commission file number is 001-12440.

Reporting Requirements Regarding Acquisition or Sale of Shares

Under Article 12 of the Securities Market Law and General Rule 269 of the SVS, certain information regarding transactions in shares of a publicly held stock corporation or in contracts or securities whose price or results depend on or are conditioned in whole or in part on the price of such shares must be reported to the SVS and the Chilean stock exchanges. Since American Depositary Shares (ADS) are deemed to represent the shares of common stock underlying the American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), transactions in ADRs will be subject to these reporting requirements and those established in Circular 1375 of the SVS. Shareholders of publicly held stock corporations are required to report to the SVS and the Chilean stock exchanges:

• any direct or indirect acquisition or sale of shares made by a holder who owns, directly or indirectly at least 10% of a publicly held stock corporation’s subscribed capital;

• any direct or indirect acquisition or sale of contracts or securities whose price or results depend on or are conditioned in whole or in part on the price of shares made by a holder who owns, directly or indirectly at least 10% of a publicly held stock corporation’s subscribed capital;

• any direct or indirect acquisition or sale of shares made by a holder who, due to an acquisition of shares of such publicly held stock company, results in the holder acquiring, directly or indirectly, at least 10% of a publicly held stock company’s subscribed capital; and

• any direct or indirect acquisition or sale of shares in any amount, made by a director, receiver, principal executive, general manager or manager of a publicly held stock company.

184

In addition, majority shareholders of a publicly held stock corporation must inform the SVS and the Chilean stock exchanges if such transactions are entered into with the intention of acquiring control of the company or if they are making a passive financial investment instead.

Under Article 54 of the Securities Market Law and General Rule 104 enacted by the SVS, any person who directly or indirectly intends to take control of a publicly held stock corporation must disclose this intent to the market at least ten business days in advance of the proposed change of control and, in any event, as soon as the negotiations for the change of control have taken place or reserved information of the publicly held stock corporation has been provided.

Corporate Objectives and Purposes

Article 4 of our bylaws states that our corporate objectives and purposes are, among other things, to conduct the exploration, development, operation, generation, distribution, transmission, transformation, or sale of energy in any form, directly or through other companies, as well as to provide engineering-consultancy services related to these objectives, in Chile and abroad and to participate in the telecommunications business.

Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors is comprised of seven members who are appointed by shareholders at the OSM of the Company and are elected for a period of three years, at the end of which they will be re-elected or replaced.

The seven directors elected at the OSM are the seven individual nominees who receive the highest majority of the votes. Each shareholder may vote his shares in favor of one nominee or may apportion his shares among any number of nominees.

The effect of these voting provisions is to ensure that a shareholder owning more than 12.5% of our shares is able to elect a member of the Board.

The compensation of the directors is set annually at the OSM. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees — B. Compensation”.

Agreements entered into by Enersis with related parties can only be executed when such agreements serve the interest of the Company, and their price, terms and conditions are consistent with prevailing market conditions at the time of their approval and comply with all the requirements and procedures indicated in Article 147 of the Chilean Companies Act.

Certain Powers of the Board of Directors

Our bylaws provide that every agreement or contract that the Company enters into with its controlling shareholder, its directors or executives, or with their related parties, must be previously approved by two thirds of the Board of Directors and be included in the Board meetings and must comply with the provisions of the Chilean Companies Act.

Our bylaws do not contain provisions relating to:

• the directors’ power, in the absence of an independent quorum, to vote on compensation for themselves or any members of their body;

• borrowing powers exercisable by the directors and how such borrowing powers can be varied;

• retirement or non-retirement of directors under an age limit requirement; or

• number of shares, if any, required for directors’ qualification.

185

Certain Provisions Regarding Shareholder Rights

As of the date of the filing of this Report, Enersis’ capital is comprised of only one class of shares, all of which are ordinary shares and have the same rights.

Our bylaws do not contain any provisions relating to:

• redemption provisions;

• sinking funds; or

• liability for capital calls by the Company.

Under Chilean law, the rights of holders of stock of the Company may only be changed by an amendment to the bylaws that complies with the requirements explained below under “Item 10. Additional Information — B. Memorandum and Articles of Association. — Shareholders’ Meetings and Voting Rights”.

Capitalization

Under Chilean law, only the shareholders of a company acting at an ESM have the power to authorize a capital increase. When an investor subscribes for shares, these are officially issued and registered under his name, and the subscriber is treated as a shareholder for all purposes, except receipt of dividends and for return of capital in the event that the shares have been subscribed but not paid. The subscriber becomes eligible to receive dividends only for the shares that he has actually paid for or, if he has paid for only a portion of such shares, the pro rata portion of the dividends declared with respect to such shares unless the company’s bylaws provide otherwise. If a subscriber does not fully pay for shares for which he has subscribed on or prior to the date agreed upon for payment, notwithstanding the actions intended by the company to collect payment, the company is entitled to auction the shares on the stock exchange where such shares are traded, for the account and risk of the debtor, the number of shares held by the debtor necessary for the company to pay the outstanding balances and disposal expenses. However, until such shares are sold at auction, the subscriber continues to hold all the rights of a shareholder, except the right to receive dividends and return of capital. The chief executive officer or the person replacing him will reduce in the shareholders’ register the number of shares in the name of the debtor shareholder to the number of shares that remain, deducting the shares sold by the company and settling the debt in the amount necessary to cover the result of such disposal after the corresponding expenses. When there are authorized and issued shares for which full payment has not been made within the period fixed by shareholders at the same ESM at which the subscription was authorized (which in no case may exceed three years from the date of such meeting), these shall be reduced in the non-subscribed amount until that date. With respect to the shares subscribed and not paid following the term mentioned above, the Board must proceed to collect payment, unless the shareholders’ meeting authorizes (by two thirds of the voting shares) a reduction of the company’s capital to the amount effectively collected, in which case the capital shall be reduced by force of law to the amount effectively paid. Once collection actions have been exhausted, the Board should propose to the shareholders’ meeting the approval by simple majority of the write-off of the outstanding balance and the reduction of capital to the amount effectively recovered.

On December 20, 2012, at an ESM, our shareholders approved the issuance of 16,441,606,297 additional shares of common stock in a capital increase involving the in kind contribution of all the equity interests in Cono Sur, an Endesa Spain wholly owned subsidiary which beneficially owned 25 companies in the five South American countries in which operate, as well as a cash contribution by the rest of the shareholders. The effectiveness of the capital increase was conditioned on the subscription by the minority shareholders of a sufficient amount of shares to permit Endesa Spain to exercise its rights to subscribe in full its share but never own more than 65% of the outstanding capital stock, as provided under Enersis’ by laws. In addition, Endesa Spain assumed several commitments to provide guarantees regarding Cono Sur’s contribution, the Company’s dividend policy, the use of cash proceeds and the assurance that Enersis would be the only Enel/Endesa Spain vehicle for further growth in South America in the conventional energy business segment.

186

Subsequent to external appraisals of the value of Cono Sur, as required by Chilean law in this context, Endesa Spain and the AFPs reached an agreement that valued Cono Sur at US$ 3,615 million. The shareholders also agreed that the preemptive rights’ offering would be carried out at Ch$ 173 per common share, or the equivalent thereof in the international markets. The shares were offered in the Santiago Stock Exchange, the NYSE (in the forms of ADSs) and Spain’s Latibex. The transaction was successfully completed with a 99% subscription during the Chilean and U.S. preemptive rights’ offerings which ended on March 26 and March 21, 2013, respectively. On March 28, the remaining 1% was auctioned off in the Santiago Stock Exchange for an aggregate of 157,043,316 common shares at a price of Ch$ 182.3 per share, 5.4% higher than the fixed price of Ch$ 173 per share applicable during the Chilean rights’ offering. Endesa Spain subscribed for 9,967,630,058 shares in exchange for Cono Sur while the minority shareholders subscribed for the remaining 6,473,976,239 shares. Total issued and paid outstanding shares at the end of the capital increase and as of the date of this Report are 49,092,772,762 shares. The 2013 capital increase involved a 50.4% increase in shares valued at approximately US$ 6 billion, of which US$ 3.6 billion were contributed by our parent company in connection with Cono Sur, and US$ 2.4 billion in cash by our minority investors.

The Cono Sur contribution involved Endesa Spain’s equity interests in nine holding companies and 16 operating companies. The nine holding companies are Inversora Dock Sud S.A., Ampla Investimentos e Serviços S.A., Endesa Brasil S.A., Investluz S.A. (Investluz), EN-Brasil Comércio e Serviços S.A. (Prátil), Distribuidora Eléctrica de Cundinamarca S.A.E.S.P (DECSA), Eléctrica Cabo Blanco S.A.C. (Cabo Blanco), Generalima S.A.C., Inversiones Distrilima S.A.C. (Distrilima). On the other hand, the 16 operating companies are as follows: Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A. (Edesur), Endesa Cemsa S.A. (Cemsa), Yacylec S.A., Central Dock Sud S.A., Ampla Energía e Serviços S.A. (Ampla), Companhia Energética do Ceará S.A. (Coelce), Companhia de Interconexão Energética S.A. (CIEN), Centrais Elétricas Cachoeira Dourada S.A. (Cachoeira Dourada), Central Geradora Termelétrica Fortaleza S.A. (Fortaleza), Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. (San Isidro), Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. (Transquillota), Codensa S.A. ESP, Emgesa S.A ESP, Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. ESP (EEC), Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A. (Edelnor), Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A. (EEPSA). For more information, see Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Preemptive Rights and Increases of Share Capital

The Chilean Companies Act requires Chilean companies to grant shareholders preemptive rights to purchase a sufficient number of shares to maintain their existing ownership percentage of such company whenever such company issues new shares.

Under Chilean law, preemptive rights are exercisable or freely transferable by shareholders during a 30-day period following the day the capital increase is made public. The options to subscribe for shares in capital increases of the company or of any other securities convertible into shares or that confer future rights over these shares, should be offered, at least once, to the shareholders pro rata to the shares held registered in their name at midnight on the fifth business day prior to the date of the start of the preemptive rights period. The preemptive rights offering and the start of the 30-day period for exercising them shall be communicated through the publication of a prominent notice, at least once, in the newspaper that should be used for notifications of shareholders’ meetings. During such 30-day period, and for an additional period of up to 30 days immediately following the initial 30-day period, publicly held stock corporations are not permitted to offer any unsubscribed shares to third parties on terms which are more favorable than those offered to their shareholders. At the end of the second 30-day period, a Chilean publicly held stock corporation is authorized to sell non-subscribed shares to third parties on any terms, provided they are sold on one of the Chilean stock exchanges.

Shareholders’ Meetings and Voting Rights

An OSM must be held within the first four months following the end of our fiscal year. The last OSM was held on April 16, 2013. An ESM may be called by the board of directors when deemed appropriate, when requested by shareholders representing at least 10% of the issued shares with voting rights, or by the SVS. To convene an OSM, or an ESM, notice must be given three times in a newspaper located in our corporate domicile. The newspaper designated by our shareholders is El Mercurio de Santiago. The first notice must be published not less than 15 days and no more than 20 days in advance of the scheduled meeting. Notice must also be mailed to each shareholder, to the SVS and to the Chilean stock exchanges.

187

The OSM shall be held on the day stated in the notice and should remain in session until having exhausted all the matters stated in the notice. However, once constituted, upon the proposal of the chairman or shareholders representing at least 10% of the shares with voting rights, the majority of the shareholders present may agree to suspend it and to continue it within the same day and place, no new constitution of the meeting nor qualification of powers being necessary, recorded in one set of minutes. Only those shareholders who were present or represented may attend the recommencement of the meeting with voting rights.

Under Chilean law, a quorum for a shareholders’ meeting is established by the presence, in person or by proxy, of shareholders representing at least a majority of the issued shares with voting rights of a company. If a quorum is not present at the first meeting, a reconvened meeting can take place at which the shareholders present are deemed to constitute a quorum regardless of the percentage of the shares represented. The second meeting must take place within 45 days following the scheduled date for the first meeting. Shareholders’ meetings adopt resolutions by the affirmative vote of a majority of those shares present or represented at the meeting. An ESM must be called to take the following actions:

• a transformation of the company into a form other than a publicly held stock corporation under the Chilean Companies Act, a merger or split-up of the company;

• an amendment to the term of duration or early dissolution of the company;

• a change in the corporation’s domicile;

• a decrease of corporate capital;

• an approval of capital contributions in kind and non-monetary assessments;

• a modification of the authority reserved to shareholders or limitations on the board of directors;

• a reduction in the number of members of the board of directors;

• a disposition of 50% or more of the assets of the corporation, whether it includes disposition of liabilities or not, as well as the approval or the amendment of the business plan which contemplates the disposition of assets in an amount greater that such percentage;

• the disposition of 50% or more of the assets of a subsidiary, as long as such subsidiary represents at least 20% of the assets of the corporation, as well as any disposition of its shares that results in the parent company losing its position as controller;

• the form of distributing corporate benefits;

• issue of guarantees for third-party liabilities which exceed 50% of the assets, except when the third party is a subsidiary of the company, in which case approval of the board of directors is deemed sufficient;

• the purchase of the corporation’s own shares;

• others established by the bylaws or the laws;

• certain remedies for the nullification of the corporate bylaws;

• inclusion in the bylaws of the right to purchase shares from minority shareholders, when the controlling shareholders reaches 95% of the company’s shares by means of a tender offer for all of the company’s shares, where at least 15% of the shares have been acquired from unrelated shareholders;

• approval or ratification of acts or contracts with related parties.

188

Regardless of the quorum present, the vote required for any of the actions above is at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares with voting rights.

Bylaw amendments for the creation of a new class of shares, or an amendment to or an elimination of those classes of shares that already exist, must be approved by at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the affected series.

Chilean law does not require a publicly held stock corporation to provide its shareholders the same level and type of information required by the securities laws regarding the solicitation of proxies. However, shareholders are entitled to examine the financial statements of a publicly held stock corporation within the 15-day period before its scheduled OSM. Under Chilean law, a notice of a shareholders meeting listing matters to be addressed at the meeting must be mailed at least 15 days prior to the date of such meeting, and, an indication of the way complete copies of the documents that support the matters submitted for voting can be obtained, which must also be made available to shareholders on the Company’s website. In the case of an OSM, the annual report of the Company’s activities, which includes audited financial statements, must also be made available to shareholders and published on the Company’s website at: www.enersis.cl.

The Chilean Companies Act provides that, upon the request by the Directors’ Committee or by shareholders representing at least 10% of the issued shares with voting rights, a Chilean company’s annual report must include, in addition to the materials provided by the board of directors to shareholders, such shareholders’ comments and proposals in relation to the company’s affairs. In accordance with article 136 of the Chilean Companies Regulation (“Reglamento de Sociedades Anónimas”), the shareholder(s) holding or representing 10% or more of the shares issued with voting rights, may:

• make comments and proposals relating to the progress of the corporate businesses in the corresponding year, no shareholder being able to make individually or jointly more than one presentation. These observations should be presented in writing to the company concisely, responsibly, and respectfully, and the respective shareholder(s) should state their willingness for these to be included as an appendix to the annual report. The board shall include in an appendix to the annual report of the year a faithful summary of the pertinent comments and proposals the interested parties had made, provided they are presented during the year or within 30 days after its ending;

• make comments and proposals on matters that the board submits for the knowledge or voting of the shareholders. The board shall include a faithful summary of those comments and proposals in all information it sends to shareholders, provided the shareholders’ proposal is received at the offices of the company at least 10 days prior to the date of dispatch of the information by the company. The shareholders should present their comments and proposals to the company, expressing their willingness for these to be included in the appendix to the respective annual report or in information sent to shareholders, as the case may be. The observations referred to in this Article may be made separately by each shareholder holding 10% or more of the shares issued with voting rights or shareholders who together hold that percentage, who should act as one.

Similarly, the Chilean Companies Act provides that whenever the board of directors of a publicly held stock corporation convenes an OSM and solicits proxies for the meeting, or circulates information supporting its decisions or other similar material, it is obligated to include the pertinent comments and proposals that may have been made by the Directors’ Committee or by shareholders owning 10% or more of the shares with voting rights who request that such comments and proposals be so included.

Only shareholders registered as such with Enersis as of 11:59 p.m. on the fifth business days prior to the date of a meeting are entitled to attend and vote their shares. A shareholder may appoint another individual, who does not need to be a shareholder, as his proxy to attend the meeting and vote on his behalf. Proxies for such representation shall be given for all the shares held by the owner. The proxy may contain specific instructions to approve, reject, or abstain with respect to any of the matters submitted for voting at the meeting and which were included in the notice. Every shareholder entitled to attend and vote at a shareholders’ meeting shall have one vote for every share subscribed.

189

There are no limitations imposed by Chilean law or the company’s bylaws on the right of nonresidents or foreigners to hold or vote shares of common stock. However, the registered holder of the shares of common stock represented by ADSs, and evidenced by outstanding ADSs, is the custodian of the Depositary, currently Banco Santander-Chile, or any successor thereto. Accordingly, holders of ADSs are not entitled to receive notice of meetings of shareholders directly or to vote the underlying shares of common stock represented by ADS directly. The Deposit Agreement contains provisions pursuant to which the Depositary has agreed to solicit instructions from registered holders of ADSs as to the exercise of the voting rights pertaining to the shares of common stock represented by the ADSs. Subject to compliance with the requirements of the Deposit Agreement and receipt of such instructions, the Depositary has agreed to endeavor, insofar as practicable and permitted under Chilean law and the provisions of the bylaws, to vote or cause to be voted (or grant a discretionary proxy to the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company or to a person designated by the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company to vote) the shares of common stock represented by the ADSs in accordance with any such instruction. The Depositary shall not itself exercise any voting discretion over any shares of common stock underlying ADSs. If no voting instructions are received by the Depositary from a holder of ADSs with respect to the shares of common stock represented by the ADSs, on or before the date established by the Depositary for such purpose, the shares of common stock represented by the ADS, may be voted in the manner directed by the Chairman of the Board of the Company, or by a person designated by the Chairman of the Board of the Company, subject to limitations set forth in the Deposit Agreement.

Dividends and Liquidation Rights

According to the Chilean Companies Act, unless otherwise decided by unanimous vote of its issued shares eligible to vote, all companies must distribute a cash dividend in an amount equal to at least 30% of their consolidated net income, before amortization and negative goodwill for each year (calculated according to the local accounting rules applicable to the Company when preparing financial statements to be submitted to the SVS), unless and except to the extent the Company has carried forward losses. The law provides that the board of directors must agree to the dividend policy and inform such policy to the shareholders at the OSM.

Any dividend in excess of 30% of net income may be paid, at the election of the shareholder, in cash, in Enersis shares, or in shares of publicly held corporations held by Enersis. Shareholders who do not expressly elect to receive a dividend other than in cash are legally presumed to have decided to receive the dividend in cash.

Dividends which are declared but not paid within the appropriate time period set forth in the Chilean Companies Act (as to minimum dividends, 30 days after declaration; as to additional dividends, the date set for payment at the time of declaration) are adjusted to reflect the change in the value of UF, from the date set for payment to the date such dividends are actually paid. Such dividends also accrue interest at the then prevailing rate for UF-denominated deposits during such period. The right to receive a dividend lapses if it is not claimed within five years from the date such dividend is payable. Payments not collected in such period are transferred to the volunteer Fire Department.

In the event of a liquidation of Enersis, the holders of shares would participate in the assets available in proportion to the number of paid-in shares held by them, after payment to all creditors.

Approval of Financial Statements

The Board of Directors is required to submit Enersis’ consolidated financial statements to the shareholders annually for their approval. If the shareholders by a vote of a majority of shares present (in person or by proxy) at the shareholders’ meeting reject the financial statements, the Board of Directors must submit new financial statements no later than 60 days from the date of such meeting. If the shareholders reject the new financial statements, the entire Board of Directors is deemed removed from office and a new board is elected at the same meeting. Directors who individually approved such financial statements are disqualified for reelection for the following period. Our shareholders have never rejected the financial statements presented by the Board of Directors.

190

Change of Control

The Capital Markets Law establishes a comprehensive regulation related to tender offers. The law defines a tender offer as the offer to purchase shares of companies which publicly offer their shares or securities convertibles into shares and which offer is made to shareholders to purchase their shares under conditions which allow the bidder to reach a certain percentage of ownership of the company within a fixed period of time. These provisions apply to both voluntary and hostile tender offers.

Acquisition of Shares

There are no provisions in our bylaws that discriminate against any existing or prospective holder of shares as a result of such shareholder owning a substantial number of shares. However, no person may directly or indirectly own more than 65% of the outstanding shares of our stock. The foregoing restriction does not apply to the depositary as record owner of shares represented by ADRs, but it does apply to each beneficial ADS holder. Additionally, our bylaws prohibit any shareholder from exercising voting power with respect to more than 65% of the common stock owned by such shareholder or on behalf of others representing more than 65% of the outstanding issued shares with voting rights.

Right of Dissenting Shareholders to Tender Their Shares

The Chilean Companies Act provides that upon the adoption of any of the resolutions enumerated below at a meeting of shareholders, dissenting shareholders acquire the right to withdraw from the company and to compel the company to repurchase their shares, subject to the fulfillment of certain terms and conditions. In order to exercise such withdrawal rights, holders of ADRs must first withdraw the shares represented by their ADRs pursuant to the terms of the deposit agreement.

“Dissenting” shareholders are defined as those who at a shareholders’ meeting vote against a resolution that results in the withdrawal right, or who if absent from such meeting, state in writing their opposition to the respective resolution, within the 30 days following the shareholders’ meeting. Shareholders present or represented at the meeting and who abstain in exercising their voting rights, shall not be considered as dissenting. The right to withdraw should be exercised for all the shares that the dissenting shareholder had registered in their name on the date on which the right is determined to participate in the meeting at which the resolution is adopted that motivates the withdrawal and which remains on the date on which their intention to withdraw is communicated to the company. The price paid to a dissenting shareholder of a publicly held stock corporation whose shares are quoted and actively traded on one of the Chilean stock exchanges, is the greater of (i) the weighted average of the sales prices for the shares as reported on the Chilean stock exchanges on which the shares are quoted for the two-month period between the ninetieth and the thirtieth day before the shareholders’ meeting giving rise to the withdrawal right, and (ii) the market price resulting from the average price of transactions on such day. If, because of the volume, frequency, number and diversity of the buyers and sellers, the SVS determines that the shares are not actively traded on a stock exchange, the price paid to the dissenting shareholder shall be the book value. Book value for this purpose shall equal paid capital plus reserves and profits, less losses, divided by the total number of subscribed shares, whether entirely or partially paid. For the purpose of making this calculation, the last consolidated statements of financial position is used, as adjusted to reflect inflation up to the date of the shareholders’ meeting which gave rise to the withdrawal right.

Article 126 of the Chilean Companies Regulation establishes that in cases where the right to withdraw arises, the company shall be obliged to inform the shareholders of this situation, the value per share that will be paid to shareholders exercising their right to withdraw and the term for exercising it. Such information should be given to shareholders at the same meeting at which the resolutions are adopted giving rise to the right of withdrawal, prior to its voting. A special communication should be given to the shareholders with rights, within two days following the date on which the rights to withdraw are born. In the case of publicly held companies, such information shall be communicated by a prominent notice in a newspaper with a wide national circulation and on its web site, plus a written communication addressed to the shareholders with rights at the address they have registered with the company. The notice of the shareholders meeting that should pronounce on a matter that could originate withdrawal rights should mention this circumstance.

191

The resolutions that result in a shareholder’s right to withdraw include, among others, the following:

• the transformation of the company into an entity which is not a publicly held stock corporation governed by Chilean Companies Act;

• the merger of the company with another company;

• disposition of 50% or more of the assets of the corporation, whether it includes disposition of liabilities or not, as well as the approval or the amendment of the business plan which contemplates the disposition of assets in an amount greater than such percentage;

• the disposition of 50% or more of the assets of a subsidiary, as long as such subsidiary represents at least 20% of the assets of the corporation, as well as any disposition of its shares that results in the parent company losing its position of controller;

• issue of guarantees for third parties’ liabilities which exceed 50% of the assets (if the third party is a subsidiary of the company, the approval of the board of directors is sufficient);

• the creation of preferential rights for a class of shares or an amendment to the existing ones. In this case the right to withdraw only accrues to the dissenting shareholders of the class or classes of shares adversely affected;

• certain remedies for the nullification of the corporate bylaws; and

• such other causes as may be established by the law or by the company’s bylaws.

Investments by AFPs

The Pension Funds’ System Law permits AFPs to invest their funds in companies that are subject to Title XII and, subject to greater restrictions, in other companies. The determination of which stocks may be purchased by AFPs is made by the Risk Classification Committee. The Risk Classification Committee establishes investment guidelines and is empowered to approve or disapprove those companies that are eligible for AFP investments. Except for the period from March 2003 to March 2004, Enersis has been a Title XII Company since 1985 and is approved by the Risk Classification Committee.

Title XII companies are required to have bylaws that limit the ownership of any shareholder to a specified maximum percentage, bylaws that require that certain actions be taken only at a meeting of the shareholders and bylaws that give the shareholders the right to approve certain investment and financing policies.

Registrations and Transfers

Shares issued by Enersis are registered with an administrative agent namedDCV Registros S.A. This entity is responsible for Enersis’ shareholders registry as well. In case of jointly owned shares, an attorney-in-fact must be appointed to represent the joint owners in dealing with Enersis.

C. Material Contracts.

None.

D. Exchange Controls.

The Central Bank of Chile is responsible for, among other things, monetary policies and exchange controls in Chile. Currently applicable foreign exchange regulations are set forth in the Compendium of Foreign Exchange Regulations (the “Compendium”) approved by the Central Bank of Chile in 2002. Appropriate registration of a foreign investment in Chile permits the investor access to the Formal Exchange Market. Foreign investments can be registered with the Foreign Investment Committee under D.L. 600 of 1974 or can be registered with the Central Bank of Chile under the Central Bank Act, Law 18840 of October 1989.

192

a) Foreign Investments Contracts and Chapter XXVI

In connection with our initial public offering of ADS in 1993, we entered into a foreign investment contract (the “Foreign Investment Contract”) with the Central Bank of Chile and the Depositary, pursuant to Article 47 of the Central Bank Act and Chapter XXVI of the former Compendium of Foreign Exchange Regulations (“Chapter XXVI”), which governed the issuance of ADS by a Chilean company. Pursuant to the Foreign Investment Contract, the foreign exchange for payments and distributions with respect to the ADS, could be purchased in either the Formal Exchange Market or the Informal Exchange Market, but such payments needed to be remitted through the Formal Exchange Market.

As of April 19, 2001, Chapter XXVI was eliminated and new investments in ADSs by non-residents of Chile are now governed instead by Chapter XIV of the Compendium. This change was made with the purpose of simplifying and facilitating the flow of capital to and from Chile. As a result of the elimination of Chapter XXVI, access to the Formal Exchange Market is no longer assured. However, because our Foreign Investment Contract was entered into pursuant to Chapter XXVI, the principles of Chapter XXVI were still applied until the most recent 2013 capital increase was carried out.

Currently, and since the issuance of new shares in connection with the 2013 capital increase, all existing shareholders (and ADS holders) lost the benefits of the Foreign Investment Contracts and Chapter XXVI, including guaranteed access to the Formal Exchange Market. The newly issued securities and the current common stock held by non-Chilean residents or domiciles is subject to Chapter XIV of the Central Bank of Chile’s Compendium. By mutual agreement between Enersis and the Bank, of Chile the latter is no longer a party to the Third Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement between Enersis and Citibank, N.A., executed on March 28, 2013, after the successful completion of the 2013 capital increase. In addition, the Central Bank of Chile, Citibank N.A. and Enersis formally ended the current exchange agreements between them by public deed issued on June 3, 2013.

The following is a summary of certain provisions of Chapter XIV that are applicable to all existing shareholders (and ADS holders). This summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Chapter XIV. Chapter XIV regulates the following type of investments: credits, deposits, investments and equity contributions (such as the contributions to be made to Enersis pursuant to the Capital Increase). A Chapter XIV investor may at any time repatriate an investment made in Enersis upon sale of the shares of Enersis and the profits derived therefrom, with no monetary ceiling, subject to the then effective regulations, which must be reported to the Central Bank of Chile.

Except for compliance with tax regulations and some reporting requirements, currently there are no rules in Chile affecting repatriation rights, except that the remittance of foreign currency must be made through a Formal Exchange Market entity. However, the Central Bank of Chile has the authority to change such rules and impose exchange controls.

The Compendium and International Bond Issuances

Chilean issuers may offer bonds issued by the Central Bank of Chile internationally under Chapter XIV, as amended, of the Compendium.

E. Taxation.

Chilean Tax Considerations

The following discussion summarizes material Chilean income and withholding tax consequences to foreign holders arising from the ownership and disposition of shares and ADSs and, to the extent any are issued, rights and ADS rights. The summary that follows does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase, own or dispose of shares or ADSs and rights or ADS

193

rights, if any, and does not purport to deal with the tax consequences applicable to all categories of investors, some of which may be subject to special rules. Holders of shares and ADSs are advised to consult their own tax advisors concerning the Chilean and other tax consequences of the ownership of shares or ADSs.

The summary that follows is based on Chilean law, as in effect on the date hereof, and is subject to any changes in these or other laws occurring after such date, possibly with retroactive effect. Under Chilean law, provisions contained in statutes such as tax rates applicable to foreign investors, the computation of taxable income for Chilean purposes and the manner in which Chilean taxes are imposed and collected may be amended only by another law. In addition, the Chilean tax authorities enact rulings and regulations of either general or specific application and interpret the provisions of the Chilean Income Tax Law. Chilean tax may not be assessed retroactively against taxpayers who act in good faith relying on such rulings, regulations and interpretations, but Chilean tax authorities may change their rulings, regulations and interpretations in the future. The discussion that follows is also based, in part, on representations of the depositary, and assumes that each obligation in the Deposit Agreement and any related agreements will be performed in accordance with its terms. As of this date, there is currently no applicable income tax treaty in effect between the United States and Chile. However, in 2010 the United States and Chile signed an income tax treaty that will enter into force once the treaty is ratified by both countries. There can be no assurance that the treaty will be ratified by either country. The following summary assumes that there is no applicable income tax treaty in effect between the United States and Chile.

As used in this Report, the term “foreign holder” means either:

• in the case of an individual holder, a person who is not a resident of Chile; for purposes of Chilean taxation, an individual is resident of Chile if he or she has resided in Chile for more than six months in one calendar year, or a total of more than six months in two consecutive fiscal years; or

• in the case of a legal entity holder, an entity that is not organized under the laws of Chile, unless the shares or ADSs are assigned to a branch, agent, representative or permanent establishment of such entity in Chile.

Taxation of Shares and ADSs

Taxation of Cash Dividends and Property Distributions

General Rule: Cash dividends paid with respect to the shares or ADSs held by a foreign holder will be subject to Chilean withholding tax, which is withheld and paid by the company. As described in the example below, the amount of the Chilean withholding tax is determined by applying a 35% rate to a “grossed-up” distribution amount (such amount equal to the sum of the actual distribution amount and the correlative Chilean corporate income tax paid by the issuer), and then subtracting as a credit such correlative Chilean corporate income tax paid by the issuer. For years 2004 through 2010, the Chilean corporate income tax rate was 17%; for 2011 and hereafter the rate is 20%. The example below illustrates the effective Chilean withholding tax burden on a cash dividend received by a foreign holder, assuming a Chilean withholding tax base rate of 35%, an effective Chilean corporate income tax rate of 20% and a distribution of 50% of the net income of the company distributable after payment of the Chilean corporate income tax:

Line		Concept and calculation assumptions	Amount
	1	Company taxable income (based on Line 1 = 100)		100.0
	2	Chilean corporate income tax : 20% x Line 1		20.0
	3	Net distributable income: Line 1 — Line 2		80.0
	4	Dividend distributed (50% of net distributable income): 50% of Line 3		40
	5	Withholding tax: (35% of (the sum of Line 4 and 50% of Line 2))		(17.5)
	6	Credit for 50% of Chilean corporate income tax : 50% x Line 2		10
	7	Net withholding tax : Line 5 + Line 6		(7.5)
	8	Net dividend received: Line 4 - Line 7		32.5
	9	Effective dividend withholding rate : Line 7 / Line 4		18.75%

194

In general, the effective Chilean dividend withholding tax rate, after giving effect to the credit for the Chilean corporate income tax paid by the company, can be computed using the following formula:

Effective Dividend	=	(Withholding tax rate) - (Chilean corporate income tax rate)
Withholding Tax Rate		1 - (Chilean corporate income tax rate)

Using the prevailing rates, the Effective Dividend Withholding Rate is

(35%-20%) / (100%-20%) = 18.75%

Dividends are generally assumed to have been paid out of the Company’s oldest retained profits for purposes of determining the level of Chilean corporate income tax that was paid by the Company. For information as to the retained earnings of the Company for tax purposes and the tax credit available on the distribution of such retained earnings, see Note 18 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.

Under Chilean Income Tax Law, dividend distributions made in property are subject to the same Chilean tax rules as cash dividends. Stock dividends that represent free shares distributed to foreign shareholders as a consequence of a capitalization made on the same corporation are not subject to Chilean taxation.

Exceptions: Despite the aforementioned general rule, there are special circumstances under which a different tax treatment would apply depending on the source of the income or due to special circumstances existing at the date of the dividend distribution. The most common special cases are briefly described below:

1) Circumstances where there is no corporate income tax credit against the Chilean withholding tax: These cases are when: (i) the financial book profits paid as dividends (following the seniority rule indicated above) exceed the Company’s taxable income (such dividend distributions in excess of the company’s taxable income determined as of December 31 of the distribution’s year will be subject to the Chilean withholding tax rate of 35%, without the corporate income tax credit; in relation to the provisional withholding rule applicable on the date of the dividend payment, please see number 3 below); or (ii) the income was not subject to corporate income tax due to an exemption of the Chilean corporate income tax, in which case the foreign holder will be also subject to the Chilean withholding tax rate of 35% without the corporate income tax credit.

2) Circumstances where dividends have been imputed to income exempted from all the Chilean income taxes: In these cases, dividends distributed by the company to the foreign holder will not be subject to Chilean withholding tax. Income exempted from Chilean income tax is expressly listed in the Chilean Income Tax Law.

3) Circumstances where dividends are subject to a provisional withholding tax: In the event that on the date of the dividend distribution there are no earnings on which income tax has been paid and there are no tax-exempt earnings, a 35% Chilean withholding tax with a provisional 20% Chilean corporate income tax credit is applicable. This provisional 20% Chilean corporate income tax credit granted must be confirmed with the information of Company’s taxable income as of December 31 of the year in which the dividend was paid. The company can agree with the foreign holders to withhold a higher amount in order to avoid under withholding of the Chilean withholding tax.

4) Circumstances when it is possible to use in Chile certain credits against income taxes paid abroad, or “foreign tax credit”: This occurs when dividends distributed by the Chilean company have as their source income generated by companies domiciled in third countries. If that income was subject to withholding tax or corporate income tax in those third countries, such income will have a credit or “foreign tax credit” against corresponding Chilean taxes, which can be proportionally transferred to the shareholders of the Chilean company.

Taxation on sale or exchange of ADSs, outside Chile

Gains obtained by a foreign holder from the sale or exchange of ADSs outside Chile will not be subject to Chilean taxation.

195

Taxation on sale or exchange of Shares

The Chilean Income Tax Law includes a tax exemption on capital gains arising from the sale of shares of listed companies traded in the stock markets. Although there are certain restrictions, in general terms, the amendment provides that in order to qualify for the capital gain exemption: (i) the shares must be of a publicly held stock corporation with a certain minimum level of trading on a stock exchange; (ii) the sale must be carried out in a Chilean stock exchange, or in a tender offer subject to Chapter XXV of the Chilean Securities Market Law; (iii) the shares which are being sold must have been acquired on a Chilean stock exchange, or in a tender offer subject to Chapter XXV of the Chilean Securities Market Law, or in an initial public offering (due to the creation of a company or to a capital increase), or due to the exchange of convertible bonds; and (iv) the shares must have been acquired after April 19, 2001.

If the shares do not qualify for the above exemption, capital gains on their sale or exchange of shares (as distinguished from sales or exchanges of ADSs representing such shares of common stock) could be subject to two alternative tax regimes: (a) general tax regime, with a 20% Chilean corporate income tax and a 35% Chilean withholding tax, the former being creditable against the latter; or (b) a 20% Chilean corporate income tax as sole tax regime, when all the following circumstances are met: (i) the sale is made between unrelated parties, (ii) the sale of shares is not a recurrent or habitual activity for the seller and (iii) at least one year has elapsed between the acquisition and the sale of the shares.

The date of acquisition of the ADSs is considered to be the date of acquisition of the shares for which the ADSs are exchanged.

Taxation of Rights and ADS Rights

For Chilean tax purposes and to the extent we issue any rights or ADS rights, the receipt of rights or ADS rights by a foreign holders of shares or ADSs pursuant to a rights offering is a nontaxable event. In addition, there are no Chilean income tax consequence to foreign holders upon the exercise or the lapse of the rights or the ADS rights.

Any gain on the sale, exchange or transfer of any ADS rights by a foreign holder is not subject to taxes in Chile.

Any gain on the sale, exchange or transfer of the rights by a foreign holder is subject to a 35% Chilean withholding tax.

Other Chilean Taxes

There is no gift, inheritance or succession tax applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of ADSs by foreign holders, but such taxes will generally apply to the transfer at death or by gift of the shares by a foreign holder. There is no Chilean stamp, issue, registration or similar taxes or duties payable by holders of shares or ADSs.

Material U.S. Income Tax Considerations

This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), administrative pronouncements, judicial decisions and final, temporary and proposed Treasury regulations, all as of the date hereof. These authorities are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. This discussion assumes that the depositary’s activities are clearly and appropriately defined so as to ensure that the tax treatment of ADSs will be identical to the tax treatment of the underlying shares.

The following are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders (as defined herein) of receiving, owning, and disposing of shares or ADSs, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular person’s decision to hold such securities and is based on the assumption stated above under “Chilean Tax Considerations” that there is no applicable income tax treaty in effect between the United States and Chile. The discussion applies only if the beneficial owner holds shares or ADSs as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes and it does not describe all of

196

the tax consequences that may be relevant in light of the beneficial owner’s particular circumstances. For instance, it does not describe all the tax consequences that may be relevant to:

• certain financial institutions;

• insurance companies;

• dealers and traders in securities who use a mark-to-market method of tax accounting;

• persons holding shares or ADSs as part of a “straddle”, integrated transaction or similar transaction;

• persons whose functional currency for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar;

• partnerships or other entities classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

• persons liable for the alternative minimum tax;

• tax-exempt organizations;

• persons holding shares or ADSs that own or are deemed to own ten percent or more of our stock; or

• persons holding shares or ADSs in connection with a trade or business conducted outside of the United States.

If an entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds shares or ADSs, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. Partnerships holding shares or ADSs and partners in such partnerships should consult their tax advisors as to the particular U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding and disposing of the shares or ADSs.

You are a “U.S. Holder” for purposes of this discussion if you are a beneficial owner of our shares or ADSs and if you are, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

• a citizen or individual resident of the United States; or

• a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; or

• an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

• a trust (i) that validly elects to be treated as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes or (ii) if (A) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and (B) one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

In general, if a beneficial owner owns ADSs, such owner will be treated as the owner of the shares represented by those ADSs for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, no gain or loss will be recognized if a beneficial owner exchanges ADSs for the underlying shares represented by those ADSs.

The U.S. Treasury has expressed concerns that parties to whom ADSs are released before shares are delivered to the depositary (pre-release) or intermediaries in the chain of ownership between beneficial owners and the issuer of the security underlying the ADSs may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits for beneficial owners of depositary shares. Such actions would also be inconsistent with the claiming of the reduced tax rate, described below, applicable to dividends received by certain non-corporate beneficial owners. Accordingly, the analysis of the creditability of Chilean taxes, and the availability of the reduced tax rate for dividends received by certain non-corporate holders, each described below, could be affected by actions taken by such parties or intermediaries.

197

This discussion assumes, and the Company believes, that it is not, and will not become, a passive foreign investment company, as described below.

Beneficial owners should consult their tax advisors with respect to their particular tax consequences of owning or disposing of shares or ADSs, including the applicability and effect of state, local, non-U.S. and other tax laws and the possibility of changes in tax laws.

Taxation of Distributions

Distributions paid on shares or ADSs other than certain pro rata distributions of shares of common stock will be treated as dividends taxable as ordinary income to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Because we do not maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles, it is expected that distributions generally will be reported as dividends.

If a beneficial owner is a U.S. Holder, subject to applicable limitations and the discussion above regarding concerns expressed by the U.S. Treasury, dividends paid by qualified foreign corporations to the beneficial owner that is not a corporation are taxable at a maximum rate of 20%. A foreign company is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends paid on stock that is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, such as the New York Stock Exchange where our ADSs are traded. Beneficial owners should consult their tax advisors to determine whether the favorable rate will apply to dividends they receive and whether they are subject to any special rules that limit their ability to be taxed at this favorable rate.

The amount of a dividend will include the net amount withheld by us in respect of Chilean withholding taxes on the distribution. The amount of the dividend will be treated as foreign-source dividend income to a beneficial owner and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to U.S. corporations under the Code. Dividends will be included in a beneficial owner’s income on the date of the beneficial owner’s, or in the case of ADSs, the Depositary’s, receipt of the dividend. The amount of any dividend paid in Chilean pesos will be a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate for converting Chilean pesos into U.S. dollars in effect on the date of such receipt regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a beneficial owner generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend income. A beneficial owner may have foreign currency gain or loss if the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on a date after the date of receipt.

Subject to applicable limitations that may vary depending upon a beneficial owner’s circumstances and subject to the discussion above regarding concerns expressed by the U.S. Treasury, the net amount of Chilean withholding tax (after reduction for the credit for Chilean corporate income tax, as discussed above under “Item 10. Additional Information — E. Taxation — Chilean Tax Considerations — Taxation of Shares and ADSs — Taxation of Cash Dividends and Property Distributions”) withheld from dividends on shares or ADSs will be creditable against a beneficial owner’s U.S. federal income tax liability. The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex and, therefore, a beneficial owner should consult the beneficial owner’s tax advisor regarding the availability of foreign tax credits in the beneficial owner’s particular circumstances. Instead of claiming a credit, a beneficial owner may, at the beneficial owner’s election, deduct such Chilean taxes in computing the beneficial owner’s taxable income, subject to generally applicable limitations under U.S. law. An election to deduct foreign taxes instead of claiming foreign tax credits applies to all taxes paid or accrued in the taxable year to foreign countries and possessions of the United States.

Sale or Other Disposition of Shares or ADSs

If a beneficial owner is a U.S. Holder, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the gain or loss a beneficial owner realizes on the sale or other disposition of shares or ADSs will be a capital gain or loss, and will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the beneficial holder has held the shares or ADSs for more than one year. The amount of a beneficial owner’s gain or loss will equal the difference between the beneficial owner’s tax basis in the shares or ADSs disposed of and the amount realized on the disposition, in each case as determined in U.S. dollars. Such gain or loss will generally be U.S.-source gain or loss for foreign tax credit purposes. In addition, certain limitations exist on the deductibility of capital losses by both corporate and individual taxpayers.

198

In certain circumstances, Chilean taxes may be imposed upon the sale of shares. See “Item 10. Additional Information — E. Taxation — Chilean Tax Considerations — Taxation of Shares and ADSs”. If a Chilean tax is imposed on the sale or disposition of shares, and a beneficial owner that is a U.S. Holder does not receive significant foreign source income from other sources, such beneficial owner may not be able to credit such Chilean tax against the beneficial owner’s U.S. federal income tax liability.

Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules

We believe that we were not a “passive foreign investment company” (“PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes for our 2013 taxable year and do not expect to be or become one for our 2014 taxable year or for the foreseeable future. However, because PFIC status depends upon the composition of a company’s income and assets and the market value of its assets from time to time, and because it is unclear whether certain types of our income constitute passive income for PFIC purposes, there can be no assurance that we will not be considered a PFIC for any taxable year. If we were a PFIC for 2013 or for any prior or future taxable year during which a beneficial owner held shares or ADSs, certain adverse consequences could apply to the beneficial owner, including the imposition of higher amounts of tax than would otherwise apply, and additional filing requirements. Beneficial owners should consult their tax advisors regarding the consequences to them if we were a PFIC, as well as the availability and advisability of making any election that might mitigate the adverse consequences of PFIC status.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

Payments of dividends and sales proceeds that are made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries generally are subject to information reporting and to backup withholding unless (i) the beneficial owner is an exempt recipient or (ii) in the case of backup withholding, the beneficial owner provides a correct taxpayer identification number and certifies that the beneficial owner is not subject to backup withholding.

The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a beneficial owner will be allowed as a credit against beneficial owner’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the beneficial owner to a refund, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.

Medicare Contribution Tax

Legislation enacted in 2010 generally imposes a tax of 3.8% on the “net investment income” of certain individuals, trusts and estates. Among other items, net investment income generally includes gross income from dividends and net gain attributable to the disposition of certain property, like the shares, ADSs, less certain deductions. A beneficial owner should consult such beneficial owner’s own tax advisor regarding the possible application of this legislation in beneficial owner’s particular circumstances.

Beneficial owners should consult their tax advisors with respect to the particular consequences to them of receiving, owning or disposing of shares or ADSs.

F. Dividends and Paying Agents.

Not applicable.

G. Statement by Experts.

Not applicable.

H. Documents on Display.

We are subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act, except that as a foreign issuer, we are not subject to the proxy rules (other than general anti-fraud rules) or the short-swing profit disclosure rules of the Exchange Act. In accordance with these statutory requirements, we file or furnish reports and other information with the SEC. Reports and other information filed or furnished by us with the SEC may be inspected and copied at the

199

public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at Room 1024, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such material may also be inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, 11 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005, on which our ADSs are listed. In addition, the SEC maintains a website that contains information filed electronically with the SEC, which can be accessed over the Internet at http://www.sec.gov.

I. Subsidiary information.

Not applicable.

Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company is exposed to risks arising from changes in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. The Company’s Board of Directors approves risk management policies at all levels.

Commodity Price Risk

In our electricity generation business, we are exposed to market risks arising from the price volatility of electricity, natural gas, diesel oil, and coal.

Natural gas is used in some of our power plants in South America. We seek to ensure our supply of this fuel by securing long-term contracts with our suppliers for terms that are expected to match the lifetime of our generation assets. These contracts generally have provisions that allow us to purchase gas at market prices prevailing at the time the purchase occurs. As of December 31, 2013, we did not hold contracts classified as derivative financial instruments, financial instruments, or derivative commodity instruments related to natural gas.

In the countries where we operate using coal and diesel oil, the dispatch mechanism allows the thermal power plants to cover their variable costs. However, under certain circumstances, fuel price fluctuations might affect marginal costs. We transfer commodity prices variations to the sale contract prices according to indexing formulas but only to the degree that this is possible in our different markets. During 2013, we entered into contracts classified as derivative commodity instruments related to coal (25,000 tons) and to petroleum (107,000 barrels), both deals for the period between January and December 2013. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 we did not hold any contracts classified as either derivative financial instruments, financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments related either to coal or to diesel oil.

Additionally, through adequate commercial risk mitigation policies, and a hydro-thermal power plant mix, we seek to naturally protect our operating income from electricity price volatility. As of December 31, 2013, we did not hold electricity price-sensitive instruments.

The Company is continually analyzing ways to hedge commodity price risk, like adjusting commodity indexed price formulas for new PPAs according to our exposition and/or analyzing ways to mitigate risk through hydrological insurance in dry years. In the future we may use price-sensitive instruments.

200

Interest Rate and Foreign Currency Risk

The recorded values of our debt as of December 31, 2013, are detailed below, according to maturity. Total values do not include the effect of derivatives.

	Expected Maturity Date
As of December 31,	2014		2015			2016		2017		2018		Thereafter		Total		Fair Value(1)
	(in millions of Ch$)
Fixed Rate
Ch$ /UF		0.12		—			—		—		—		—		0.12		0.12
Weighted average interest rate		6.8%		—			—		—		—		—		6.8%		—
US$		273,987		118,109			151,855		11,056		13,310		218,076		786,393		951,775
Weighted average interest rate		7.5%		8.7			7.6%		7.0%		6.5%		7.7%		7.7%		—
Other currencies (2)		94,189		39,375	��		29,464		24,464		33,408		325,310		546,210		625,954
Weighted average interest rate		9.6%		7.0%			7.1%		6.7%		6.6%		8.6%		8.4%		—
Total fixed rate		368,176		157,485			181,319		35,520		46,718		543,385		1,332,603		1,577,729
Weighted average interest rate		8.1%		8.3%			7.5%		6.8%		6.6%		8.2%		8.0%		—
Variable rate
Ch$ /UF		10,268		10,641			9,470		8,074		8,259		296,257		342,970		430,799
Weighted average interest rate		9.6%		9.7%			9.1%		8.2%		8.2%		7.0%		7.3%		—
US$		212,763		22,019			20,913		26,060		13,173		599		295,526		295,213
Weighted average interest rate		3.3%		3.2%			2.9%		2.7%		3.9%		1.5%		3.2%		—
Other currencies (2)		148,426		130,825			151,050		274,829		237,087		539,600		1,481,817		1,626,441
Weighted average interest rate		9.1%		9.1%			9.7%		8.6%		8.6%		6.8%		8.1%		—
Total variable rate		371,458		163,484			181,433		308,963		258,520		836,456		2,120,313		2,352,452
Weighted average interest rate		5.8%		8.4%			8.9%		8.1%		8.4%		6.9%		7.3%		—
		739,634		320,969			362,752		344,483		305,237		1,379,841		3,452,916		3,930,181

(1) As of December 31, 2013, fair value was calculated based on the discounted value of future cash flows expected to be paid (or received), considering current discount rates that reflect the different risks involved.

(2) “Other currencies” include the Euro, Brazilian real, Colombian peso, Argentine peso, and Peruvian nuevo sol.

201

The recorded values of our debt as of December 31, 2012, are detailed below, according to maturity. Total values do not include the effect of derivatives.

	Expected Maturity Date
As of December 31,	2013		2014		2015		2016		2017		Thereafter		Total		Fair Value(1)
	(in millions of Ch$)
Fixed Rate
Ch$ /UF		0.4		—		—		—		—		—		0.4		0.4
Weighted average interest rate		6.6%		—		—		—		—		—		6.6%		—
US$		270,603		117,138		103,757		134,381		5,302		184,966		876,966		1,103,329
Weighted average interest rate		8.2%		7.6%		8.8%		7.6%		8.2%		7.7%		8.0%		—
Other currencies (2)		99,688		72,595		36,498		27,048		27,543		291,860		555,232		579,092
Weighted average interest rate		10.4%		7.9%		7.4%		7.5%		6.9%		9.0%		8.8%		—
Total fixed rate		370,291		249,733		140,256		161,429		32,845		476,826		1,431,378		1,682,422
Weighted average interest rate		8.8%		7.7%		8.4%		7.6%		7.1%		8.5%		8.3%		—
Variable rate
Ch$ /UF		9,721		10,062		10,427		9,280		7,912		298,392		345,793		366,069
Weighted average interest rate		9.2%		9.2%		9.2%		9.0%		8.7%		7.6%		7.8%		—
US$		24,357		114,486		20,145		19,133		23,842		12,599		214,562		214,562
Weighted average interest rate		5.8%		2..3%		3.5%		3.3%		3.1%		4.2%		3.1%		—
Other currencies (2)		177,724		164,414		128,450		137,425		248,719		422,293		1,299,024		1,381,468
Weighted average interest rate		11.2%		10.3%		9.1%		9.6%		9.4%		8.8%		9.5%		—
Total Variable Rate		211,802		288,961		159,021		165,837		280,472		753,285		1,859,379		1,962,099
Weighted average interest rate		10.5%		7.1%		8.4%		8.8%		8.8%		8.2%		8.5%		—
Total		582,093		538,694		229,277		327,266		313,317		1,230,111		3,290,757		3,644,521

(1) As of December 31, 2012, fair value was calculated based on the discounted value of future cash flows expected to be paid (or received), considering current discount rates that reflect the different risks involved.

(2) “Other currencies” include the Euro, Brazilian real, Colombian peso, Argentine peso and Peruvian nuevo sol.

Interest Rate Risk

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, 28.4% and 38.8% respectively of our outstanding net debt obligations were subject to floating interest rates.

We manage interest rate risk by maintaining a mixture of both variable and fixed rate debt, according to the policy approved by the Board of Directors. Additionally, we manage interest rate risk through the use of interest rate derivatives. The above percentages include the effect of interest rate derivatives (swaps or collars) that hedge part of our debt.

202

As of December 31, 2013, the recorded values for financial accounting purposes and the corresponding fair values of the instruments that hedge our interest rate risk exposure are as follows:

	Expected Maturity Date
As of December 31,	2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		Thereafter		Total		Fair   Value (2)
	(in millions of Ch$) (1)
Variable to fixed rates		120,566		3,127		49,492		50,694		—		—		223,879		6,107
Fixed to variable rates		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		120,566		3,127		49,492		50,694		—		—		223,879		6,107

(1) Calculated based on the Observed Exchange Rate for December 31, 2013, which was Ch$ 524.61 per US$ 1.00.

(2) Fair value was calculated based on the discounted value of future cash flows expected to be paid (or received), considering current discount rates that reflect the different risks involved.

By comparison, as of December 31, 2012, the recorded values for financial accounting purposes and the corresponding fair value of the instruments that hedge for our interest rate risk exposure was as follows:

	Expected Maturity Date
As of December 31,	2013		2014		2015		2016		2017		Thereafter		Total		Fair   Value (2)
	(in millions of Ch$) (1)
Variable to fixed rates		1,728		111,680		4,150		51,907		52,949		—		222,413		(2,584)
Fixed to variable rates		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		1,728		111,680		4,150		51,907		52,949		—		222,413		(2,584)

(1) Calculated based on the Observed Exchange Rate for December 31, 2012, which was Ch$ 479.96 per US$ 1.00.

(2) Fair values were calculated based on the discounted value of future cash flows expected to be paid (or received), considering current discount rates that reflect the different risks involved.

Foreign Currency Risk

We are exposed to foreign currency risk arising from debt denominated in U.S. dollars, Chilean pesos, and in other currencies. Some of our subsidiaries have a natural hedge between their revenues and the currency of their debt. For example, in the case of our subsidiaries in Colombia, their revenues as well as their debts are linked to the Colombian peso. In other cases, we do not have this natural hedge, and therefore we try to manage this exposure with currency derivatives, such as U.S. dollar/UF exchange and U.S. dollar/local currency derivatives. However, this is not always possible because of market conditions. For example, that is the case of Endesa Costanera in Argentina, with revenues linked to the Argentine peso and a substantial part of its debt denominated in U.S. dollars, with no reasonable possibility of hedging this debt.

Our corporate currency risk policy has been in effect since 2004. This policy takes the level of operating income of each country that is indexed to the U.S. dollar and seeks to hedge income with liabilities in the same currency.

203

As of December 31, 2013, the recorded values for financial accounting purposes and the corresponding fair value of the instruments that hedge our foreign exchange risk are as follows:

	Expected Maturity Date
As of December 31,	2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		Thereafter		Total		Fair Value (2)
	(in millions of Ch$) (1)
UF to US$		207,560		—		—		—		—		—		207,560		20,865
US$ to Ch$/UF		296,460		—		220,783		—		—		—		517,243		(210,379)
Ch$ to US$		25,619		—		—		—		—		—		25,619		362
US$ to other currencies (3)		—		3,171		—		—		—		—		3,171		(1,494)
Other currencies to $ (4)		4,605		—		—		—		—		—		4,605		121
Total		534,245		3,171		220,783		—		—		—		758,198		(190,526)

(1) Calculated based on the Observed Exchange Rate for December 31, 2013, which was Ch$ 524.61 per US$ 1.00.

(2) Fair values were calculated based on the discounted value of future cash flows expected to be paid (or received), considering current discount rates that reflect the different risks involved.

(3) Other currencies include Brazilian reais.

(4) Include a Peruvian soles to US$ hedge of Edegel (Chinango).

By comparison, as of December 31, 2012 the recorded values for financial accounting purposes and the corresponding fair values of the instruments that hedge for our interest rate risk was as follows:

	Expected Maturity Date
As of December 31,	2013		2014		2015		2016		2017		Thereafter		Total		Fair Value(2)
	(in millions of Ch$) (1)
UF to $		—		189,894		—		—		—		—		189,894		28,634
$ to Ch$/UF		—		290,498		—		216,342		—		—		506,840		(228,008)
$ to Other currencies (3)		—		—		4,823		—		—		—		4,823		(3,142)
Other currencies to $ (4)		—		4,213		—		—		—		—		4,213		578
Total		—		484,605		4,823		216,342		—		—		705,771		(201,938)

(1) Calculated based on the Observed Exchange Rate for December 31, 2012, which was Ch$ 479.96 per US$ 1.00.

(2) Fair values were calculated based on the discounted value of future cash flows expected to be paid (or received), considering current discount rates that reflect the different risks involved.

(3) Other currencies include Brazilian reals.

(4) Include a Peruvian soles to US$ hedge of Edegel (Chinango).

(d)   Safe Harbor

The information in this “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk”, contains information that may constitute forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” in the Introduction of this Report for safe harbor provisions.

Item 12.     Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities

A. Debt Securities.

Not applicable.

B. Warrants and Rights.

Not applicable.

C. Other Securities.

Not applicable.

204

D. American Depositary Shares.

Depositary Fees and Charges

The Company’s ADS program is administered by Citibank, N.A., as depositary. Under the terms of the deposit agreement, an ADS holder may have to pay the following service fees to the depositary:

Service Fees	Fees
(1) Issuance of ADS upon deposit of shares	Up to US$ 5.00 per 100 ADS (or fraction thereof) issued.
(2) Delivery of deposited securities against surrender of ADS	Up to US$ 5.00 per 100 ADS (or fraction thereof) surrendered.
(3) Distribution of cash dividends or other cash distributions (i.e., sale of rights and other entitlements)	Up to US$ 5.00 per 100 ADS (or fraction thereof) held.
(4) Distribution of ADS pursuant to (i) stock dividends or other free stock distributions, or (ii) exercise of rights to purchase additional ADS	Up to US$ 5.00 per 100 ADS (or fraction thereof) held.
(5) Distribution of securities other than ADS or rights to purchase additional ADS (i.e., spin—off of shares)	Up to US$ 5.00 per 100 ADS (or fraction thereof) held.
(6) Depositary services	Up to US$ 5.00 per 100 ADS (or fraction thereof) held on the applicable record date(s) established by the Depositary.

Depositary Payments for Fiscal Year 2013

The depositary has agreed to reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Company in connection with the Company’s ADS program. In 2013, the depositary reimbursed expenses related to investor relations’ activities for a total amount of US$ 973,054 (after applicable US taxes).

205

PART II

Item  13.     Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

None.

Item  14.     Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item  15.     Controls and Procedures

(a)   Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13 (a) -15 (e) and 15 (d) -15 (e) under the Exchange Act) for the year ended December 31, 2013.

There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error, and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

Based upon the Company’s evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is gathered and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at that reasonable assurance level.

(b)   Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

As required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002, Enersis’ management is responsible for establishing and maintaining “adequate internal control over financial reporting” (as defined in Rule 13(a)-15 (f) under the Exchange Act). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not necessarily prevent or detect some misstatements. It can only provide reasonable assurance regarding financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness for future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or because the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate over time.

Management assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2013. The assessment was based on criteria established in” Internal Control – An Integrated Framework (1992)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on the assessment, Enersis’ management has concluded that as of December 31, 2013, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

206

(c)   Attestation Report

Ernst & Young Ltda., the independent registered public accounting firm that has audited our consolidated financial statements and has also issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. This attestation report appears on page F-3.

(d)   Changes in internal control

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item  16.     Reserved

Item 16A.     Audit Committee Financial Expert

As of December 31, 2013, the Directors’ Committee’s (which performs the functions of the Audit Committee) financial expert was Mr. Hernán Somerville, as determined by the Board of Directors. Mr. Somerville is an independent member of the Directors’ Committee pursuant to the requirement of both Chilean law and NYSE corporate governance rules.

Item 16B.     Code of Ethics

The standards of ethical conduct at Enersis are governed by means of four corporate rulings or policies: the Charter Governing Executives (Estatuto del Directivo), the Code of Ethics, the Zero Tolerance Anti-Corruption Plan (the “ZTAC Plan”) and the Manual for the Management of Information of Interest to the Market (the “Manual”).

The Charter Governing Executives was adopted by the Board of Directors in May 2003 and is applicable to all executives contractually related to Enersis or its controlled subsidiaries in which it is the majority shareholder, both in Chile and abroad, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and other senior officers of the Company. The objective of this set of rules is to establish standards for the governance of management’s actions, the behavior of management with respect to the principles governing their actions and the limitations and incompatibilities involved, all within Enersis’ vision, mission and values. Likewise, the Employee Code of Conduct explains our principles and ethical values, establishes the rules governing our contact with customers and suppliers, and establishes the principles that should be followed by employees, including ethical conduct, professionalism and confidentiality. Both documents also impose limitations on the activities that our executives and other employees may undertake outside the scope of their employment with us.

The Manual, adopted by Enersis’ Board of Directors in May 2008 and amended in February 2010, addresses the following issues: applicable standards and blackout periods in connection with the transactions of the Company’s securities or those of its affiliates by directors, management, principal executives, employees and other related parties; mechanisms for the continuous release of information that is of interest to the market; and mechanisms that provide protection for confidential information.

In addition to the abovementioned corporate governance rules, the Board of the Company approved the Code of Ethics and the ZTAC Plan in its meeting held on June 24, 2010. The Code of Ethics is based on general principles such as impartiality, honesty, integrity and other values of similar importance, which are translated into detailed behavioral criteria. The ZTAC Plan reinforces the principles included in the Code of Ethics, but with a special emphasis in avoiding corruption in the form of bribery, preferential treatment, and other similar acts.

207

A copy of these documents is available upon request, free of charge, by writing or calling us at:

Investor Relations Department

Enersis S.A.

Santa Rosa 76, Piso 15

Santiago, Chile

(56-2) 2353-4682

During fiscal year 2013, there have been no amendments to any provisions of the abovementioned documents. No waivers from any provisions of the Charter Governing Executives, the Code of Ethics, the ZTAC Plan or the Manual, were expressly or implicitly granted to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer or any other senior financial officer of the Company in fiscal year 2013.

Item 16C.     Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table provides information on the aggregate fees billed by our principal accountants, as well as the other member firms of Ernst & Young and their respective affiliates, by type of service rendered for the periods indicated.

Services Rendered	2013		2012
	(in millions of Ch$)
Audit fees (1)(2)		1,645		1,572
Audit-related fees (3)		149		78
Tax fees		—		—
All other fees (4)		—		107
Total		1,794		1,757

(1) The increase in audit fees during 2013 was principally due to :

• Inflation due to fees agreed to in the local currencies in Peru, Brazil, and Argentina. Such effects amounted to Ch$ 81.79 million.

• Transfer of Endesa Latinoamérica’s investments to Enersis, amounting to Ch$ 39.65 million.

(2) The fees associated with the capital increase are part of total of audit fees. These fees relate to Ch $ 199.26 million approved in 2012 and Ch$ 233.96 million approved in 2013.

(3) The increase in audit-related fees during 2013 was due the following services provided:

• Sustainability audit services in Chile and Brazil in the amount of Ch$ 45.60 million.

• Covenant review of Compañía Generadora Termoeléctrica Fortaleza and review of “Luz para Todos” program for Ampla Energia y Servicios, totaling Ch$ 9.91 million.

(4) During 2013, there were no all other fees recorded. During 2012, all other fees were incurred mainly due to a research and development project review and an energy efficiency study for Endesa Brasil, at a cost of Ch$ 100.13 million.

All of the fees listed under audit-related fees and all other fees were pre-approved following the Directors’ Committee pre-approval policies and procedures.

The amounts included in the table above and the related footnotes have been classified in accordance with SEC guidelines.

Directors’ Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our external auditors are appointed by our shareholders at the OSM. Similarly, the shareholders of our subsidiaries, which are located in countries where applicable law and regulation so establishes, appoint their own external auditors.

208

The Directors’ Committee (which performs the functions of the Audit Committee), acting through the CFO, manages appointment proposals, reviews engagement letters, negotiates fees, ensures quality control in respect of the services provided, reviews and controls independence issues, and other related matters.

The Directors’ Committee has a pre-approval policy regarding the contracting of Enersis’ external auditor, or any affiliate of the external auditor, for professional services. The professional services covered by such policy include audit and non-audit services provided to Enersis.

Fees payable in connection with recurring audit services are pre-approved as part of our annual budget. Fees payable in connection with non-recurring audit services, once they have been analyzed by the CFO, are submitted to the Directors’ Committee for approval or rejection.

The pre-approval policy established by the Directors’ Committee for non-audit services and audit-related fees is as follows:

• The business unit that has requested the service and the audit firm expected to perform the service must request that the CFO review the nature of the service to be provided.

• The CFO then analyzes the request and requires the selected audit firm to issue a certificate signed by the partner responsible for the audit of our consolidated financial statements confirming such audit firm’s independence.

• Finally, the proposal is submitted to the Directors’ Committee for approval or denial.

The services described in footnote (2) and (3) of the table above have been approved in accordance with the procedure described immediately above since July 2005.

The Directors’ Committee has designed, approved, and implemented the necessary procedures to fulfill the new requirements described in SEC release number 34-53677, File No. PCAOB-2006-01 (Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Certain Tax Services).

Item 16D.     Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

Not applicable.

Item 16E.     Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

	(a)Total Number of Shares adquired (1)		(b) Average Price Paid per Share (Ch$/per Share)		(c) Total Number of Shares adquired		(d) Maximum Number of Shares that might be yet adquired
March 2013		9,967,630,058		173.0		9,967,630,058		—
Total		9,967,630,058		173.0		9,967,630,058		—

(1) Corresponds to number of Shares subscribed by Endesa Spain in exchange for Cono Sur, see “Item 10. Additional Information — E. Taxation” and “Item 10. Additional Information — B. Memorandum and Articles of Association. — Capitalization”.

Item 16F.     Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and through the date of this Report, the principal independent accountant engaged to audit our financial statements, Ernst & Young Ltda., has not resigned, or indicated that it has declined to stand for re-election after the completion of its current audit, or been dismissed.

209

Item 16G.     Corporate Governance

For a summary of the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and those applicable to domestic issuers under the corporate governance rules of the NYSE, please see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees — C. Board Practices”.

Item 16H.     Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

210

PART III

Item 17.     Financial Statements

None.

Item 18.     Financial Statements

ENERSIS S.A. and Subsidiaries

Index to the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms:
Report of Ernst & Young Servicios Profesionales de Auditoría y Asesorías Limitada — Enersis S.A. 2013 and 2012	F-1
Report of Ernst & Young Servicios Profesionales de Auditoría y Asesorías Limitada — Enersis S.A. — Internal Control over Financial Reporting 2013	F-3
Report of KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda. — Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. 2013 and 2012	F-5
Report of KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda. — Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. — Internal Control over Financial Reporting 2013	F-7
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012	F-9
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	F-11
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	F-13
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	F-14
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	F-15
SCHEDULE I Enersis S.A.’s condensed unconsolidated financial information	F-178

Ch$	Chilean pesos
US$	U.S. dollars
UF	The UF is a Chilean inflation-indexed, peso-denominated monetary unit that is set daily in advance based on the previous month’s inflation rate.
ThCh$	Thousand of Chilean pesos
ThUS$	Thousand of U.S. dollars

211

Item 19. Exhibits

Exhibit	Description
1.1	By-laws (Estatutos) of ENERSIS S.A., as amended.(*)
8.1	List of Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013
12.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act
12.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act
13.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act
23.1	Consent of Ernst & Young Servicios Profesionales de Auditoría y Asesorías Limitada, an independent registered public accounting firm
23.2	Consent of KPMG Auditores y Consultores Ltda., an independent registered public accounting firm

(*) Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 1.1 to Enersis’ Registration Statements on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-186823)

We will furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, copies of any not filed instruments that define the rights of stakeholders of Enersis.

212

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

ENERSIS S.A.
By:	/s/ Ignacio Antoñanzas A.
Name:	Ignacio Antoñanzas A.
Title:	Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 3, 2014

213

Enersis and Subsidiaries

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 together with the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

Index to the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms:

Report of Ernst & Young Servicios Profesionales de Auditoría y Asesorías Limitada — Enersis S.A. 2013 and 2012	F-1
Report of Ernst & Young Servicios Profesionales de Auditoría y Asesorías Limitada — Enersis S.A. — Internal Control over Financial Reporting 2013	F-3
Report of KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda. — Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. 2013 and 2012	F-5
Report of KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda. — Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. — Internal Control over Financial Reporting 2013	F-7
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012	F-9
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	F-11
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	F-13
Consolidated Statements of Direct Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	F-14
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	F-15
SCHEDULE I Enersis S.A.’s condensed unconsolidated financial information	F-184

Ch$	Chilean pesos
US$	U.S. dollars
UF	The UF is a Chilean inflation-indexed, peso-denominated monetary unit that is set daily in advance based on the previous month’s inflation rate.
ThCh$	Thousand of Chilean pesos
ThUS$	Thousand of U.S. dollars

EY Chile Avda. Presidente Riesco 5435, piso 4, Santiago   Tel: +56 (2) 2676 1000 www.eychile.cl    

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Enersis S.A.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Enersis S.A. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Enersis S.A.’s condensed unconsolidated financial information. These consolidated financial statements and the schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the schedule based on our audits.

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the consolidated financial statements of its subsidiary, Empresa Nacional de Electridad S.A (“Endesa-Chile”). The consolidated financial statements of Endesa-Chile include the financial statements of the following entities, each having been prepared in conformity with its respective local statutory accounting basis: Emgesa S.A. E.S.P (“Emgesa”) and Endesa Argentina S.A. (“Endesa-Argentina”) (both subsidiaries of Endesa-Chile), and of Endesa Brasil S.A. (“Endesa-Brasil”) (a consolidated subsidiary of the Company that is also a 38.64% percent owned investee of Endesa-Chile accounted for using the equity method). Except for the amounts included in Endesa-Chile’s consolidated financial statements relating to Emgesa, Endesa-Argentina and Endesa-Brasil, which we subjected to our audit procedures in the context of the financial statements of Enersis, taken as a whole, we did not audit the consolidated financial statements of Endesa-Chile. The consolidated financial statements of Endesa-Chile, exclusive of the amounts relating to Emgesa, Endesa-Argentina and Endesa-Brasil, reflect total assets constituting 24%, 28% and 29% of the Company’s consolidated total assets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively, and total revenues constituting 16%, 18% and 16% of the Company’s consolidated total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Endesa-Chile’s consolidated financial statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Endesa-Chile (but exclusive of the amounts for Emgesa, Endesa-Argentina and Endesa-Brasil), is based solely on the report of the other auditors.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited

F-1

In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors (see second paragraph above), the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Enersis S.A. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule of condensed unconsolidated financial information, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements, taken as whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Enersis S.A.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated April 2, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon based on our audit and the report on internal controls of other auditors.

/s/ Ernst & Young Ltda.

Ernst & Young Ltda.

Santiago, Chile

April 2, 2014

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited

F-2

EY Chile Avda. Presidente Riesco 5435, piso 4, Santiago   Tel: +56 (2) 2676 1000 www.eychile.cl    

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Enersis S.A.

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Enersis S.A. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the “COSO criteria”). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We did not examine the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Empresa Nacional De Electricidad S.A. (a subsidiary) and certain of its subsidiaries, associates and jointly controlled entities (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Endesa-Chile”) which statements reflect total assets and total revenues constituting 39% and 26%, respectively, of the related consolidated totals. The effectiveness of Endesa-Chile’s internal control over financial reporting was audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the effectiveness of Endesa-Chile’s internal control over financial reporting, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited

F-3

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in

accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, based on our audit and the report of other auditors, Enersis S.A. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of financial position of Enersis S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012 and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 of Enersis S.A. and subsidiaries and the financial statement schedule of Enersis S.A.’s condensed unconsolidated financial information, and our report dated April 2, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon based on our audit and the report of other auditors.

/s/ Ernst & Young Ltda.

Ernst & Young Ltda.

Santiago, Chile

April 2, 2014

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited

F-4

	KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda.	Teléfono +56 (2) 2798 1000
	Av. Isidora Goyenechea 3520, Piso 2	Fax +56 (2) 2798 1001
	Las Condes, Santiago, Chile	www.kpmg.cl

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. (Endesa–Chile):

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Endesa-Chile and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and January 1, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of certain subsidiaries, which statements reflect total assets constituting 36.12 percent, 33.54 percent and 31.22 percent, of the Company’s consolidated total asset position as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively, and total revenues constituting 36.26 percent, 38.27 percent and 39.3 percent of the Company’s consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, we did not audit the financial statements of Endesa Brasil S.A. The Company’s investment in Endesa Brasil S.A. at December 31, 2013, 2012 and January 1, 2012 was ThCh$ 543,713,349, ThCh$ 574,168,681 and ThCh$ 569,012,759 as of December 31, 2013,2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively, and its equity earning was ThCh$94,402,624, ThCh$107,503,620 and ThCh$115,355,267 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Those consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with the local statutory accounting basis were audited by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for those entities on such basis of accounting, is based solely on the reports of the other auditors. Accordingly, we have audited the conversion adjustments to the financial statements of these subsidiaries and nonsubsidiary investees prepared in accordance with the local statutory accounting basis to conform them to the Company’s accounting basis referred to below.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of the other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Endesa-Chile and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and January 1, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

© 2014 KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda, a Chilean limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

F-5

As indicated in Note 2.2 a) to the consolidated financial statements, starting from January 1, 2013 and due to the application of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 11 “Joint Arrangements,” the Company changed its valuation method of investments which business are jointly controlled. As required by this standard, the consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and their related notes to the financial statements, were retrospectively restated.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Endesa-Chile’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 27, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG

KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda.

Santiago, Chile

March 27, 2014

© 2014 KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda, a Chilean limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

F-6

	KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda.	Teléfono +56 (2) 2798 1000
	Av. Isidora Goyenechea 3520, Piso 2	Fax +56 (2) 2798 1001
	Las Condes, Santiago, Chile	www.kpmg.cl

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. (Endesa–Chile):

We have audited Endesa-Chile’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Endesa-Chile’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Endesa-Chile’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

© 2014 KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda, a Chilean limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

F-7

In our opinion, Endesa-Chile maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statement of financial position of Endesa-Chile and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January1, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013, and our report dated March 27, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG

KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda.

Santiago, Chile

March 27, 2014

© 2014 KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda, a Chilean limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

F-8

ENERSIS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, Classified

 At December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012

 (In thousands of Chilean pesos)

		12-31-2013		12-31-2012 (*)		1-1-2012 (*)
ASSETS	Note			Restated		Restated
		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	6		1,606,387,569		815,832,061		1,187,684,209
Other current financial assets	7		781,029,437		194,500,798		939,220
Other current non-financial assets			141,597,292		103,376,711		69,479,673
Trade and other current receivables	8		1,045,263,881		846,791,111		950,007,713
Accounts receivable from related companies	9		34,019,574		47,570,282		61,912,486
Inventories	10		77,782,755		76,563,085		70,334,841
Current tax assets	11		210,134,773		205,554,882		138,365,618
Total current assets other than assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations			3,896,215,281		2,290,188,930		2,478,723,760
Non-current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations	12		-		-		-
Non-current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations			-		-		-
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS			3,896,215,281		2,290,188,930		2,478,723,760
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Other non-current financial assets	7		491,536,418		439,018,106		37,246,770
Other non-current non-financial assets			84,091,825		87,788,359		109,213,012
Non-current receivables	8		223,045,673		202,900,342		443,128,492
Non-current accounts receivable from related companies	9		-		-		-
Investments accounted for using the equity method	13		248,080,880		214,517,345		194,785,717
Intangible assets other than goodwill	14		1,173,560,361		1,202,002,511		1,466,680,979
Goodwill	15		1,372,320,328		1,391,673,952		1,468,307,108
Property, plant, and equipment	16		7,433,798,725		7,049,923,571		7,045,908,847
Investment property	17		44,877,049		46,922,970		38,055,889
Deferred tax assets	18		210,137,767		321,556,216		367,036,508
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS			11,281,449,026		10,956,303,372		11,170,363,322
TOTAL ASSETS			15,177,664,307		13,246,492,302		13,649,087,082

(*) See Note 2.2a).

F-9

 ENERSIS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, Classified

 At December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012

 (In thousands of Chilean pesos)

		12-31-2013		12-31-2012 (*)			1-1-2012 (*)
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	Note			Restated			Restated
		ThCh$		ThCh$			ThCh$
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other current financial liabilities	19		906,675,205		658,423,302			660,562,558
Trade and other current payables	22		1,419,592,332		1,194,851,750			1,213,388,313
Accounts payable to related companies	9		204,412,270		150,259,507			160,358,684
Other current provisions	23		118,582,658		89,730,702			99,189,386
Current tax liabilities	11		255,148,385		169,545,538			232,246,173
Other current non-financial liabilities			76,848,849		83,919,926	��		56,288,910
Total current liabilities other than those associated with current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations			2,981,259,699		2,346,730,725			2,422,034,024
Liabilities associated with current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations	12		-		-			-
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES			2,981,259,699		2,346,730,725			2,422,034,024
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other non-current financial liabilities	19		2,790,249,111		2,928,119,869			3,271,355,293
Other non-current payables	22		23,063,878		14,257,438			14,304,607
Non-current accounts payable to related companies	9		-		-			-
Other long-term provisions	23		193,967,353		176,575,035			202,015,839
Deferred tax liabilities	18		395,486,890		501,127,697			482,260,262
Non-current provisions for employee benefits	24		238,514,991		256,161,368			269,353,075
Other non-current non-financial liabilities			47,657,524		65,313,125			96,722,791
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES			3,688,939,747		3,941,554,532			4,336,011,867
TOTAL LIABILITIES			6,670,199,446		6,288,285,257			6,758,045,891
EQUITY
Issued capital	25.1		5,669,280,725		2,824,882,835			2,824,882,835
Retained earnings			2,813,634,297		2,421,278,841			2,232,968,880
Share premium	25.1		158,759,648		158,759,648			158,759,648
Other reserves	25.5		(2,473,120,417)		(1,511,122,753)			(1,320,882,757)
Equity attributable to shareholders of Enersis			6,168,554,253		3,893,798,571			3,895,728,606
Non-controlling interests	25.6		2,338,910,608		3,064,408,474			2,995,312,585
TOTAL EQUITY			8,507,464,861		6,958,207,045			6,891,041,191
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY			15,177,664,307		13,246,492,302			13,649,087,082

(*) See note 2.2a)

F-10

ENERSIS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, by Type For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 (In thousands of Chilean pesos)
		January - December
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Profit (loss)		2013		2012 (*)		2011 (*)
	Note	ThCh$		Restated ThCh$		Restated ThCh$
Sales	26		5,696,777,240		6,182,123,698		6,107,142,811
Other operating income	26		567,668,662		313,829,750		279,457,083
Revenues			6,264,445,902		6,495,953,448		6,386,599,894
Raw materials and consumables used	27		(3,089,141,195)		(3,695,022,919)		(3,450,163,125)
Contribution Margin			3,175,304,707		2,800,930,529		2,936,436,769
Other work performed by the entity and capitalized			61,965,528		48,667,382		49,921,196
Employee benefits expenses	28		(465,682,098)		(409,179,836)		(371,753,777)
Depreciation and amortization expense	29		(435,473,259)		(434,483,734)		(416,864,931)
Impairment loss recognized in the period’s profit or loss	29		(74,877,924)		(42,612,727)		(136,119,203)
Other expenses	30		(520,098,689)		(492,558,847)		(522,693,103)
Operating Income			1,741,138,265		1,470,762,767		1,538,926,951
Other gains (losses)	31		19,170,005		15,186,412		(4,731,186)
Financial income	32		260,126,546		232,129,980		194,545,840
Financial costs	32		(388,367,634)		(419,888,938)		(423,128,515)
Share of profit of associates accounted for using the equity method	13		25,289,219		30,381,936		26,891,233
Foreign currency exchange differences	32		(30,373,115)		(16,126,401)		20,124,044
Profit (loss) from indexed assets and liabilities	32		(9,414,755)		(12,756,868)		(25,206,927)
Income before tax			1,617,568,531		1,299,688,888		1,327,421,440
Income tax	33		(504,167,785)		(406,675,920)		(455,469,317)
Net income from continuing operations			1,113,400,746		893,012,968		871,952,123
Net income from discontinued operations			-		-		-
NET INCOME			1,113,400,746		893,012,968		871,952,123
Net income attributable to
Shareholders of Enersis			658,514,150		377,350,521		375,471,254
Non-controlling interests	25.6		454,886,596		515,662,447		496,480,869
NET INCOME			1,113,400,746		893,012,968		871,952,123
Basic earnings per share
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations (**)	Ch$/Share		14.56		11.56		11.50
Basic earnings per share	Ch$/Share		14.56		11.56		11.50
Weighted average number of shares of common stock	Thousands		45,218,860		32,651,166		32,651,166
Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations (**)	Ch$/Share		14.56		11.56		11.50
Diluted earnings per share	Ch$/Share		14.56		11.56		11.50
Weighted average number of shares of common stock	Thousands		45,218,860		32,651,166		32,651,166

(*) See note 2.2a)

(**) If we considered the outstanding amount of shares as of December 31, 2013 (49,092,773 thousand shares), the Proforma Basic earning per share from continuing operations and the Proforma Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations would be 13.41 Ch$/share for both.

F-11

ENERSIS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, by Type For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 (In thousands of Chilean pesos)
		January - December
		2013		2012 (*)		2011 (*)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	Note	ThCh$		Restated ThCh$		Restated ThCh$
Net Income			1,113,400,746		893,012,968		871,952,123
Components of other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss, before taxes
Actuarial gains (losses) on defined benefit plans	24.2.f		6,351,518		(14,044,750)		(61,614,524)
Other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss			6,351,518		(14,044,750)		(61,614,524)
Components of other comprehensive income that will be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss, before taxes
Foreign currency translation gains (losses)			(76,723,893)		(364,848,647)		211,297,640
Gains (losses) of available-for-sale financial assets			(2,273)		515		(55,959)
Share of other comprehensive income from associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method			8,367,223		737,736		(15,880,240)
Gains (losses) from cash flow hedge			(76,144,260)		72,360,295		(63,842,341)
Adjustments from reclassification of cash flow hedges, transferred to profit or loss			55,283		(6,300,885)		(8,309,911)
Other comprehensive income that will be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss			(144,447,920)		(298,050,986)		123,209,189
Other components of other comprehensive income, before taxes			(138,096,402)		(312,095,736)		61,594,665
Income tax related to components of other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
Income tax related to defined benefit plans			(2,603,231)		4,662,040		23,078,884
Income tax related to components of other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss			(2,603,231)		4,662,040		23,078,884
Income tax related to components of other comprehensive income that will be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
Income tax related to cash flow hedge			12,332,516		(25,726,629)		14,110,400
Income tax related to available-for-sale financial assets			455		(569)		9,513
Income tax related to components of other comprehensive income that will be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss			12,332,971		(25,727,198)		14,119,913
Total Other Comprehensive Income			(128,366,662)		(333,160,894)		98,793,462
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME			985,034,084		559,852,074		970,745,585
Comprehensive income attributable to
Shareholders of Enersis			577,348,684		187,169,558		368,568,685
Non-controlling interests			407,685,400		372,682,516		602,176,900
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME			985,034,084		559,852,074		970,745,585

(*) See note 2.2a)

F-12

ENERSIS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES Statements of Changes in Equity For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 (In thousands of Chilean pesos)
Statements of Changes in Equity	Issued capital		Share Premium		Changes in Other Reserves												Retained earnings		Equity Attributable to Shareholders of Enersis		Non- Controlling Interests		Total Equity
					Reserve for Exchange Differences in Translation		Reserve for Cash Flow Hedges		Reserves for Gains and Losses for Defined Benefit Plans		Reserves for Gains and Losses on Remeasuring Available-for-Sale Financial Assets		Other Miscellaneous Reserves		Other reserves
Equity at beginning of period 01/01/2013		2,824,882,835		158,759,648		(40,720,059)		27,594,028		-		13,647		(1,498,010,369)		(1,511,122,753)		2,421,278,841		3,893,798,571		3,064,408,474		6,958,207,045
Changes in equity
Comprehensive income
Net income																		658,514,150		658,514,150		454,886,596		1,113,400,746
Other comprehensive income						(57,187,681)		(30,680,754)		6,865,655		(1,836)		(160,850)		(81,165,466)				(81,165,466)		(47,201,196)		(128,366,662)
Comprehensive income																				577,348,684		407,685,400		985,034,084
Equity issuance		2,844,397,890		1,460,503														-		2,845,858,393				2,845,858,393
Dividends																		(273,024,349)		(273,024,349)				(273,024,349)
Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes		-		(1,460,503)		-		-		(6,865,655)		-		74,015,741		67,150,086		6,865,655		72,555,238		(388,551,690)		(315,996,452)
Increase (decrease) from changes in stakes in subsidiaries that do not entail a loss of control						41,885,724								(989,868,008)		(947,982,284)		-		(947,982,284)		(744,631,576)		(1,692,613,860)
Total changes in equity		2,844,397,890		-		(15,301,957)		(30,680,754)		-		(1,836)		(916,013,117)		(961,997,664)		392,355,456		2,274,755,682		(725,497,866)		1,549,257,816
Equity at end of period 12/31/2013		5,669,280,725		158,759,648		(56,022,016)		(3,086,726)		-		11,811		(2,414,023,486)		(2,473,120,417)		2,813,634,297		6,168,554,253		2,338,910,608		8,507,464,861
Statements of Changes in Equity	Issued capital		Share Premium		Changes in Other Reserves												Retained earnings		Equity Attributable to Shareholders of Enersis		Non- Controlling Interests		Total Equity
					Reserve for Exchange Differences in Translation		Reserve for Cash Flow Hedge		Reserves for Gains and Losses for Defined Benefit Plans		Reserves for Gains and Losses on Remeasuring Available- for-Sale Financial Assets		Other Miscellaneous Reserves		Other reserves
Equity at beginning of period 01/01/2012		2,824,882,835		158,759,648		176,622,668		(310,265)		-		13,836		(1,497,208,996)		(1,320,882,757)		2,232,968,880		3,895,728,606		2,995,312,585		6,891,041,191
Changes in equity
Comprehensive income
Net income																		377,350,521		377,350,521		515,662,447		893,012,968
Other comprehensive income						(217,342,727)		27,904,293		(742,368)		(189)		28		(190,180,963)				(190,180,963)		(142,979,931)		(333,160,894)
Comprehensive income																				187,169,558		372,682,516		559,852,074
Dividends																		(188,298,192)		(188,298,192)				(188,298,192)
Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes		-		-		-		-		742,368		-		(801,401)		(59,033)		(742,368)		(801,401)		(303,586,627)		(304,388,028)
Total changes in equity		-		-		(217,342,727)		27,904,293		-		(189)		(801,373)		(190,239,996)		188,309,961		(1,930,035)		69,095,889		67,165,854
Equity at end of period 12/31/2012 Restated (*)		2,824,882,835		158,759,648		(40,720,059)		27,594,028		-		13,647		(1,498,010,369)		(1,511,122,753)		2,421,278,841		3,893,798,571		3,064,408,474		6,958,207,045
Statements of Changes in Equity	Issued capital		Share Premium		Changes in Other Reserves												Retained earnings		Equity Attributable to Shareholders of Enersis		Non- Controlling Interests		Total Equity
					Reserve for Exchange Differences in Translation		Reserve for Cash Flow Hedge		Reserves for Gains and Losses for Defined Benefit Plans		Reserves for Gains and Losses on Remeasuring Available- for-Sale Financial Assets		Other Miscellaneous Reserves		Other reserves
Equity at beginning of period 01/01/2011		2,824,882,835		158,759,648		113,278,890		40,783,463		-		41,825		(1,505,891,534)		(1,351,787,356)		2,103,689,509		3,735,544,636		2,778,483,320		6,514,027,956
Changes in equity
Comprehensive income
Net income																		375,471,254		375,471,254		496,480,869		871,952,123
Other comprehensive income						60,106,895		(41,093,728)		(25,887,747)		(27,989)		-		(6,902,569)				(6,902,569)		105,696,031		98,793,462
Comprehensive income																				368,568,685		602,176,900		970,745,585
Dividends																		(209,886,734)		(209,886,734)				(209,886,734)
Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes		-		-		3,236,883		-		25,887,747		-		8,682,538		37,807,168		(36,305,149)		1,502,019		(385,347,635)		(383,845,616)
Total changes in equity		-		-		63,343,778		(41,093,728)		-		(27,989)		8,682,538		30,904,599		129,279,371		160,183,970		216,829,265		377,013,235
Equity at end of period 12/31/2011 Restated (*)		2,824,882,835		158,759,648		176,622,668		(310,265)		-		13,836		(1,497,208,996)		(1,320,882,757)		2,232,968,880		3,895,728,606		2,995,312,585		6,891,041,191

 (*) See note 2.2a)

F-13

ENERSIS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Direct Cash Flow For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 (In thousands of Chilean pesos)
		January - December
		2013		2012 (*)		2011 (*)
Statements of Direct Cash Flow	Note	ThCh$		Restated ThCh$		Restated ThCh$
Cash flow from (used in) operating activities
Types of collections from operating activities
Collections from the sale of goods and services			6,946,352,718		7,421,957,070		7,554,155,043
Collections from royalties, payments, commissions, and other income from ordinary activities			86,605,572		93,605,931		86,290,041
Collections from premiums and services, annual payments, and other benefits from policies held			74,183,266		5,903,050		16,628,221
Other collections from operating activities			509,496,016		384,127,217		251,484,266
Types of payments
Payments to suppliers for goods and services			(3,690,576,400)		(3,899,057,207)		(3,804,072,531)
Payments to and on behalf of employees			(448,354,032)		(400,061,812)		(349,702,202)
Payments on premiums and services, annual payments, and other obligations from policies held			(5,782,311)		(8,066,513)		(5,627,373)
Other payments for operating activities			(1,176,355,154)		(1,351,575,914)		(1,544,218,673)
Income taxes paid			(381,648,502)		(452,305,887)		(358,664,017)
Other outflows of cash			(212,945,529)		(251,163,500)		(173,026,445)
Net cash flows from operating activities			1,700,975,644		1,543,362,435		1,673,246,330
Cash flows from (used in) investment activities
Cash flows from the loss of control of subsidiaries or other business			-		-		12,662,234
Cash flows used to obtain control of subsidiaries or other business			(5,084,700)		(7,140,000)		(4,058,192)
Other collections from the sale of equity or debt instruments belonging to other entities			871,863,989		-		-
Other payments to acquire equity or debt instruments from other entities			(1,433,536,193)		(194,093,275)		-
Loans to related companies			(4,844,706)		-		(1,326,000)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment			7,449,529		918,437		6,041,469
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment			(603,413,832)		(517,233,484)		(484,028,401)
Proceeds from the sale of intangible assets			-		-		8,965,592
Purchases of intangible assets			(169,371,666)		(187,197,935)		(187,551,511)
Purchases of other long-term assets			(2,034,104)		(2,859,668)		(2,183,333)
Payments from future, forward, option, and swap contracts			(3,485,915)		(2,691,688)		(3,474,792)
Collections from future, forward, option, and swap contracts			14,308,008		2,013,452		4,108,554
Collections from related entities			4,895,411		2,600,730		-
Dividends received			9,081,705		7,539,711		4,025,233
Interest received			92,176,821		56,681,895		19,611,804
Other inflows (outflows) of cash			(1,891,436)		(674,255)		10,748,226
Net cash flows used in investment activities			(1,223,887,089)		(842,136,080)		(616,459,117)
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities
Proceeds from share issuance			1,130,817,519		-		-
Total proceeds from loans			530,735,256		501,199,355		643,919,707
Proceeds from long-term loans			487,162,501		400,797,521		525,077,859
Proceeds from short-term loans			43,572,755		100,401,834		118,841,848
Loans from related companies			693,084		-		18,257,300
Payments on borrowings			(563,049,681)		(645,675,778)		(617,735,935)
Payments on financial lease liabilities			(9,388,183)		(25,491,730)		(11,478,851)
Dividends paid			(482,046,152)		(547,081,888)		(648,107,205)
Interest paid			(230,584,133)		(253,478,855)		(245,683,421)
Other outflows of cash			(40,412,354)		(41,745,935)		(14,511,368)
Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities			336,765,356		(1,012,274,831)		(875,339,773)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents before effect of exchange rate changes			813,853,911		(311,048,476)		181,447,440
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents			(23,298,403)		(60,803,672)		76,040,491
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents			790,555,508		(371,852,148)		257,487,931
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	6		815,832,061		1,187,684,209		930,196,278
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	6		1,606,387,569		815,832,061		1,187,684,209

(*) See note 2.2a)

F-14

ENERSIS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Contents				Page
1.	THE GROUP’S ACTIVITIES AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS			F-19
2.	BASIS OF PRESENTATION OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS			F-20
	2.1.	Accounting principles		F-20
	2.2.	New accounting pronouncements		F-20
	2.3.	Responsibility for the information given and estimates made		F-25
	2.4.	Subsidiaries		F-25
		2.4.1.  Changes in the scope of consolidation		F-26
		2.4.2.  Consolidated companies with an ownership interest of less than 50%		F-26
		2.4.3.  Unconsolidated companies with an ownership interest of more than 50%		F-26
	2.5.Associated companies and joint arrangements			F-26
	2.6.Basis of consolidation and business combinations			F-27
3.	ACCOUNTING CRITERIA APPLIED			F-29
	a)	Property, plant, and equipment		F-29
	b)	Investment property		F-31
	c)	Goodwill		F-31
	d)	Intangible assets other than goodwill		F-32
		d.1)	Concessions	F-32
		d.2)	Research and development expenses	F-33
		d.3)	Other intangible assets	F-33
	e)	Asset impairment		F-33
		e.1)	Non-financial assets (except inventory and deferred tax assets)	F-33
		e.2)	Financial assets	F-34
	f)	Leases		F-35
	g)	Financial instruments		F-35
		g.1)	Financial assets other than derivatives	F-35
		g.2)	Cash and cash equivalents	F-36
		g.3)	Financial liabilities other than derivatives	F-36
		g.4)	Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting	F-36
		g.5)	Fair value measurement and classification of financial instruments	F-38
		g.6)	Derecognition of financial assets and liabilities	F-38
	h)	Investments accounted for using the equity method		F-38
	i)	Inventories		F-39
	j)	Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations		F-39
	k)	Treasury shares		F-39
	l)	Provisions		F-39
		l.1)	Provisions for post-employment benefits and similar obligations	F-40
	m)	Conversion of balances in foreign currency		F-40
	n)	Current / non-current classification		F-41
	o)	Income tax		F-41
	p)	Revenue and expense recognition		F-41
	q)	Earnings per share		F-42
	r)	Dividends		F-42
	s)	Systems of share-based remunerations		F-42
	t)	Share issuance and placement expenses		F-43
	u)	Cash flow statement		F-43
4.	CAPITAL INCREASE			F-44

F-15

5.	SECTOR REGULATIONS AND ELECTRICITY SYSTEM OPERATIONS		F-46
	5.1	Generation	F-46
	5.2	Distribution	F-50
6.	CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		F-54
7.	OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS		F-55
8.	TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES		F-56
9.	BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES		F-58
	9.1	Balances and transactions with related companies	F-58
	9.2	Board of Directors and key management personnel	F-61
	9.3	Compensation for key management personnel	F-63
	9.4	Compensation plans linked to share price	F-64
10.	INVENTORIES		F-66
11.	TAX RECEIVABLES AND PAYABLES		F-66
12.	NON-CURRENT ASSETS AND DISPOSAL GROUPS HELD FOR SALE		F-67
13.	INVESTMENTS ACCOUNTED FOR USING THE EQUITY METHOD		F-68
	13.1.Investments accounted for using the equity method		F-68
14.	INTANGIBLE ASSETS OTHER THAN GOODWILL		F-71
15.	GOODWILL		F-73
16.	PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT		F-75
	a)	Main investments	F-76
	b)	Finance leases	F-76
	c)	Operating leases	F-77
	d)	Other information	F-77
17.	INVESTMENT PROPERTY		F-79
18.	DEFERRED TAX		F-80
19.	OTHER FINANCIAL LIABILITIES		F-82
	19.1.Interest-bearing borrowings		F-82
	19.2.Unsecured Liabilities		F-85
	19.3.Secured obligations		F-86
	19.4.Hedged debt		F-89
	19.5.Other information		F-89
20.	RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY		F-90
	20.1.Interest rate risk		F-90
	20.2.Exchange rate risk		F-91
	20.3.Commodities risk		F-91
	20.4.Liquidity risk		F-91
	20.5.Credit risk		F-92
	20.6.Risk measurement		F-92

F-16

21.	FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS			F-94
	21.1.	Financial instruments, classified by type and category		F-94
		a)	Detail of financial assets	F-94
		b)	Detail of financial liabilities	F-95
	21.2.	Derivative instruments		F-95
		a)  Assets and liabilities for hedge derivative instruments		F-96
		b)  Financial derivative instrument assets and liabilities at fair value with changes in net income		F-96
		c)  Other information on derivatives		F-97
	21.3.	Fair value hierarchies		F-97
22.	TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES			F-99
23.	PROVISIONS			F-100
24.	EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS			F-101
	24.1.	General information		F-101
	24.2.	Details, changes, and presentation in financial instruments		F-102
	24.3.	Other disclosures		F-105
25.	TOTAL EQUITY			F-106
	25.1.	Equity attributable to the shareholders of Enersis		F-106
		25.1.1.    Subscribed and paid capital and number of shares		F-106
		25.1.2.    Dividends		F-106
	25.2.	Foreign currency translation reserves		F-108
	25.3.	Capital management		F-108
	25.4.	Restrictions on subsidiaries’ transferring funds to the parent		F-108
	25.5.	Other reserves		F-108
	25.6.	Non-controlling interests		F-110
26.	REVENUES			F-111
27.	RAW MATERIALS AND CONSUMABLES USED			F-112
28.	EMPLOYEE BENEFITS EXPENSE			F-112
29.	DEPRECIATION, AMORTIZATION, AND IMPAIRMENT LOSSES			F-112
30.	OTHER EXPENSES			F-113
31.	OTHER GAINS (LOSSES)			F-113
32.	FINANCIAL RESULTS			F-114
33.	INCOME TAX			F-115
34.	INFORMATION BY SEGMENT			F-116
	34.1.	Segmentation criteria		F-116
	34.2.	Generation, distribution, and others		F-117
	34.3.	Countries		F-120
	34.4.	Generation and distribution by country		F-123

F-17

35.	THIRD PARTY GUARANTEES, OTHER CONTINGENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES, AND OTHER COMMITMENTS.		F-129
	35.1.	Direct guarantees	F-129
	35.2.	Indirect guarantees	F-129
	35.3.	Lawsuits and arbitrations proceedings	F-130
	35.4.	Financial restrictions	F-140
	35.5.	Other information	F-143
36.	PERSONNEL FIGURES		F-144
37.	SANCTIONS		F-145
38.	SUBSEQUENT EVENTS		F-155
39.	ENVIRONMENT		F-157
40.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION ON SUBSIDIARIES, SUMMARIZED		F-157

APPENDIX 1		ENERSIS GROUP COMPANIES	F-159
APPENDIX 2		CHANGES IN SCOPE OF CONSOLIDATION	F-162
APPENDIX 3		ASSOCIATED COMPANIES AND JOINT VENTURES	F-163
APPENDIX 4		ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON FINANCIAL DEBT	F-164
	a)	Bank borrowings	F-164
	b)	Secured and unsecured liabilities	F-166
	c)	Finance lease obligations	F-168
	d)	Other liabilities	F-168
APPENDIX 5		DETAILS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES IN FOREIGN CURRENCY	F-169
APPENDIX 6		ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OFICIO CIRCULAR(OFFICIAL BULLETIN)	F-171
No. 715 OF FEBRUARY 3, 2012
APPENDIX 6.1		COMPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON TRADE RECEIVABLES	F-174
APPENDIX 7		FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, RESTATED	F-180

F-18

 ENERSIS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012.

 (In thousands of Chilean pesos)

1. THE GROUP’S ACTIVITIES AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Enersis S.A. (hereinafter the Parent Company or the Company) and its subsidiaries comprise the Enersis Group (hereinafter Enersis or the Group).

Enersis S.A. is a publicly traded corporation with registered address and head office located at Avenida Santa Rosa, No. 76, in Santiago, Chile. The Company is registered in the securities register of the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance of Chile (Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros or SVS) under number 175. In addition, the Company is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States of America (hereinafter U.S. SEC) and with Spain’s Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores. The Company’s shares have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange since 1993 and on the Latibex since 2001.

Enersis S.A. is a subsidiary of Endesa, S.A., a Spanish company controlled by Enel S.p.A. (hereinafter Enel).

The Company was initially created in 1981 under the corporate name of Compañía Chilena Metropolitana de Distribución Eléctrica S.A. Later on, the Company changed its by-laws and its name to Enersis S.A. effective August 1, 1988. For tax purposes, the Company operates under Chilean tax identification number 94.271.000-3.

As of December 31, 2013, the Group had 11,574 employees. During 2013, the Group averaged a total of 11,301 employees. See Note 36 for additional information regarding employee distribution by category and geographic location.

The Company’s corporate purpose consists of exploring for, developing, operating, generating, distributing, transmitting, transforming, and/or selling energy of any kind or form, whether in Chile or abroad, either directly or through other companies. It is also engaged in telecommunications activities, and it provides engineering consultation services in Chile and abroad. The Company’s corporate purpose also includes investing in, and managing, its investments in subsidiaries and associates which generate, transmit, distribute, or sell electricity, or whose corporate purpose includes any of the following:

(i)   energy of any kind or form,

(ii)   supplying public services, or services whose main component is energy,

(iii)   telecommunications and information technology services, and

(iv)   Internet-based intermediation business.

The Company’s 2012 consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors at a meeting held on January 30, 2013. The consolidated financial statements were then submitted to the consideration of a General Shareholders´ Meeting held on April 16, 2013, which gave its final approval to the consolidated financial statements.

These consolidated financial statements are presented in thousands of Chilean pesos (unless expressly stated otherwise), as the Chilean peso is the functional currency of the Company. Foreign operations are reported in accordance with the accounting policies stated in Notes 2.6 and 3.m.

F-19

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2.1 Accounting principles

The December 31, 2013 consolidated financial statements of Enersis have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and approved by the Company’s Board of Directors at its meeting held on February 7, 2014.

These consolidated financial statements present fairly the financial position of Enersis and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and January 1, 2012, as well as the results of operations, the changes in equity, and the cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011.

These consolidated financial statements voluntarily present the figures for the 2011 fiscal year from the consolidated comprehensive income statement, the consolidated cash flow statement, the statement of changes in consolidated equity, and their notes.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using cost method accounting applied to the business in operation principle except, in accordance with IFRS, those assets and liabilities that are reported at a fair value and those non-current assets and groups that are available for sale, which are recorded at the book value or the fair value minus sales costs, whichever is lower (see Note 3).

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared from accounting records maintained by the Company and its subsidiaries. Each entity prepares its financial statements according to the accounting principles and standards in force in each country, so the necessary adjustments and reclassifications have been made in the consolidation process in order to present the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS and the criteria of the IFRS Interpretation Committee (hereinafter IFRSIC).

2.2 New accounting pronouncements

a) Accounting pronouncements effective from January 1, 2013:

Standards, Interpretations, and Amendments	Mandatory Application for:
Amendment to IAS 1: Presentation of Financial Statements Modifies aspects of the presentation of components of “Other Comprehensive Income.” It requires that these components be grouped under those that will and those that will not subsequently be reclassified as profits and losses.	Annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2012.
IFRS 10: Consolidated Financial Statements Establishes clarifications and new parameters for defining control and for the principles of preparing consolidated financial statements. It applies to all entities (including special purpose or structured entities).	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.
IFRS 11: Joint Arrangements Redefines the concept of joint arrangement in order to align it with IFRS 10. It requires that the entities that are party to a joint arrangement determine what type of arrangement is involved (joint operation or joint venture) by assessing their rights and obligations. The standard eliminates the possibility of proportional consolidation for joint ventures.	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

F-20

Standards, Interpretations, and Amendments	Mandatory Application for:
IFRS 12: Disclosures of Interests in Other Entities Requires certain disclosures that allow for assessing the nature of stakes in other entities and the risks associated with these stakes, as well as the effects of these stakes on the entity’s financial situation, financial performance, and cash flows.	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.
IFRS 13: Fair Value Measurement Establishes, in a single standard, a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities, and incorporates new concepts and clarifications for such measurement. It also requires information to be disclosed by the entities on the measurements of the fair value of their assets and liabilities.	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.
New IAS 27: Separate Financial Statements The issuance of IFRS 10 eliminated all matters regarding consolidated financial statements from IAS 27, restricting its scope to separate financial statements only.	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.
New IAS 28: Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures Amended by the issuance of IFRS 10 and IFRS 11 for the purpose of making the definitions and other clarifications contained in these new IFRS uniform.	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.
Amendment to IFRS 7: Financial Instruments - Disclosures Clarifies the requirements of disclosures relating to offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities.	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.
Amendment to IAS 19: Employee Benefits Modifies the recognition and disclosure for changes in obligations for defined benefit plans and the assets involved in the plan, eliminating the corridor method and accelerating recognition of past service costs.	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.
Improvements to the IFRS Corresponds to a number of necessary but non-urgent improvements that amend the following standards: IFRS 1, IAS 1, IAS 16, IAS 32, and IAS 34.	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.
Transition Guide (Amendments to IFRS 10, 11, and 12) The amendments clarify IFRS 10 transition guidance. These amendments also simplify the transition for IFRS 10, IFRS 11, and IFRS 12, limiting the requirements to the provision of adjusted comparative information for the immediately preceding period only. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirement to present comparative information for disclosures related to unconsolidated structured entities for periods prior to the first application of IFRS 12.	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

The Group applied of these new pronouncements retrospectively, except for IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement, which was applied prospectively.

F-21

IFRS 11Joint Arrangements

As of 2013, with the application of IFRS 11,Joint Arrangements, companies controlled jointly by the Group that were consolidated proportionally up to the financial statements presented as of December 31, 2012, must now be recorded using the equity method (see Notes 2.5 and 3.h), as required by the new standard for joint arrangements that qualify asJoint Ventures.

The companies involved are the following:

- Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén S.A. and subsidiaries.

- Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. and subsidiaries.

- Distribuidora Eléctrica de Cundinamarca S.A. and subsidiary.

- Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda.

Since the application of IFRS 11,Joint Arrangements, is retrospective, these consolidated financial statements include restatements made to the statements of financial position as of December 31 and January 1, 2012; to the comprehensive income, changes in net equity, and cash flow statements for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011; and the explanatory notes; all previously issued and approved by the Enersis management bodies. These changes do not affect the determination of equity or profit attributable to the shareholders of Enersis.

The application of this standard has not affected basic earnings per share, nor has it given rise to a stock dilution.

The following is a summary of the net effect of the restatement on the each of the respective financial statement line items:

(in thousands of Chilean pesos)	Changes
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position	12-31-2012        ThCh$	01-01-2012   ThCh$
Current assets	(64,329,503)	(47,241,248)
Non-current assets	(7,011,835)	(37,542,422)
TOTAL ASSETS	(71,341,338)	(84,783,670)
Current liabilities	(34,381,510)	(38,499,611)
Non-current liabilities	(31,398,295)	(41,171,393)
Equity attributable to shareholders of Enersis	-	-
Non-controlling interests	(5,561,533)	(5,112,666)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	(71,341,338)	(84,783,670)
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	12-31-2012 ThCh$	12-31-2011 ThCh$
Revenue	(81,713,866)	(148,280,450)
Raw materials and consumable used	22,102,568	88,271,604
CONTRIBUTION MARGIN	(59,611,298)	(60,008,846)
Depreciation and amortization expense	8,863,455	8,073,361
Operating Income	(26,201,781)	(27,383,758)
Net income before tax	(5,764,328)	(5,955,872)
Net income attributable to shareholders of Enersis	-	-
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	(549,014)	(588,497)
NET INCOME	(549,014)	(588,497)
Consolidated Statements of Cash flow	12-31-2012 ThCh$	12-31-2011 ThCh$
Net cash flow from (used in) operating activities	(17,276,127)	(25,200,136)
Net cash flow from (used in) investment activities	6,144,889	7,510,563
Net cash flow from (used in) financing activities	(191,044)	16,089,778
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	2,011,384	521,495
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	(32,237,059)	(31,158,759)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	(41,547,957)	(32,237,059)

For more details, see Appendix 7.

F-22

Amendment to IAS 19“Employee Benefits”

The application of the amendment to IAS 19,Employee Benefits, which was applied retrospectively, means that these consolidated financial statements include modifications to the presentation of the comprehensive income statements for the 2012 and 2011 fiscal years and their respective explanatory notes, which, at the time, were approved by the Enersis management bodies. These changes do not affect the determination of equity or earnings attributable to the shareholders of Enersis.

This modification has been made because, under the new standard, financial results must present in net figures for each defined benefit plan established for the Group’s employees. This resulted in a reduction of ThCh$32,126,591 and ThCh$39,138,315 in financial revenues and costs for the 2012 and 2011 fiscal years, respectively.

The application of this standard does not affect basic earnings per share, nor has it given rise to a stock dilution.

The rest of the standards and amendments adopted, which went into effect on January 1, 2013, has not had a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements of Enersis and its subsidiaries.

b) Accounting pronouncements effective from January 1, 2014 and subsequent periods:

As of the issuance date of these consolidated financial statements, the following accounting pronouncements had been issued by the International Accounting Standards Boards (IASB), but they were not yet mandatory:

Standards, Interpretations, and Amendments	Mandatory Application for:
Amendment to IAS 32: Financial Instruments: Presentation Clarifies the requirements for offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities in order to eliminate inconsistencies in applying the current IAS 32 criteria for offsetting.	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014.
Amendments to IFRS 10 and 12, and IAS 27: Investment Entities Under IFRS 10, reporting entities are required to consolidate all of the companies over which they have control. The amendment establishes an exception to these requirements, allowing Investment Entities to measure their investments at fair value with changes in income as provided for under IFRS 9 instead of consolidating them.	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014.
IFRS 9: Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement This is the first stage of the IASB project to replace IAS 39, “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.” It modifies the classification and measurement of financial assets and includes the treatment and classification of financial liabilities.	No date set. Early application of concluded stages is permitted.
IFRIC 21: Levies This interpretation of IAS 37, “Provisions, Contingent Assets, and Contingent Liabilities,” provides guidance on when an entity must recognize a liability for a levy imposed by a government other than income tax in its financial statements.	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014.

F-23

Standards, Interpretations, and Amendments	Mandatory Application for:
Amendment to IAS 36: Impairment of Assets The amendment clarifies the extent of disclosures regarding the recoverable value of impaired assets, limiting the information requirements to the recoverable amount, based on the fair value less costs of disposal.	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014.
Amendment to IAS 39: Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement This amendment incorporates into the Standard the criteria that must be met in order not to discontinue hedge accounting if a hedging derivative is novated.	Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014.
Amendment to IFRS 9: Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement This is the second stage of the IASB project to replace IAS 39,Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. This amendment adds a special chapter on hedge accounting that establishes a new model aimed at reflecting better alignment between accounting and risk management. Improvements have also been made to the disclosures required. This amendment also eliminates the mandatory application date for IFRS 9 since the third and final stage of the project, which covers impairment of financial assets, has still not been completed.	No date set. Early application of concluded stages is permitted.
Amendment to IAS 19: Employee Benefits The purpose of this modification to the scope of IAS 19 is to simplify the accounting for contributions not affected by the employee’s years of service, such as employee contributions calculated on the basis of a fixed percentage of a salary.	Annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2014.
Improvements to the IFRS (2010-2012 and 2011-2013 cycles) This is a set of improvements that are necessary but not urgent. They make changes to the following standards: IFRS 2, IFRS 3, IFRS 8, IFRS 13, IAS 16, IAS 24, IAS 38, and IAS 40.	Annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2014.

The Group is assessing the impact of applying IFRS 9 from the date it goes into effect. In Management’s opinion, the application of other standards, interpretations, and amendments pending application will not have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements of Enersis and its subsidiaries.

F-24

2.3 Responsibility for the information given and the estimates made

The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the information contained in these consolidated financial statements and expressly states that all IFRS principles and standards, as issued by the IASB, have been fully implemented.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, certain estimates made by the Company’s Management have been used to quantify some of the assets, liabilities, income, expenses, and commitments recorded in the statements.

These estimates basically refer to:

- The valuation of assets and goodwill to determine the existence of impairment losses (see Note 3.e).

- The assumptions used to calculate the actuarial liabilities and obligations to employees, such as discount rates, mortality tables, salary raises, etc. (see Notes 3.l.1 and 24).

- The useful life of property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets (see Notes 3.a and 3.d).

- The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of financial instruments (see Notes 3.g.5 and 21).

- Energy supplied to customers whose meter readings are pending.

- Certain assumptions inherent in the electricity system affecting transactions with other companies, such as production, customer billings, energy consumption, etc. that allow for estimating electricity system settlements that must occur on the corresponding final settlement dates, but that are pending as of the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements and could affect the balances of assets, liabilities, income, and expenses recorded in the statements.

- The probability that uncertain or contingent liabilities will be incurred and their related amounts (see Note 3.l).

- Future disbursements for the closure of facilities and restoration of land (see Note 3.a).

- The tax results of the various subsidiaries of the Group that will be reported to the respective tax authorities in the future, and that have served as the basis for recording different balances related to income taxes in these consolidated financial statements (see Note 3.o).

Although these estimates have been based on the best information available on the issuance date of these consolidated financial statements, future events may occur that would require a change (increase or decrease) to these estimates in subsequent periods. This change would be made prospectively, recognizing the effects of such an estimation change in the corresponding future consolidated financial statements.

2.4 Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are defined as entities in which Enersis controls, directly or indirectly, the majority of the substantive voting rights or, should that not be the case, entities where it has rights granting it the present power to direct the entities’ relevant activities, including, for these purposes, its potential voting rights or those of third parties that are exercisable or convertible at the end of each fiscal year.

Enersis is exposed to, or entitled to, these companies’ variable results and is able to influence the amount of such results.

Appendix 1 of these consolidated financial statements, entitled Enersis Group Companies, describes the relationship of Enersis with each of its subsidiaries.

F-25

2.4.1  Changes in the scope of consolidation

During the first quarter of 2013, the following companies entered the Enersis Group’s scope of consolidation: Generalima S.A.C., Eléctrica Cabo Blanco S.A.C., Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A., Endesa Cemsa S.A., Inversora Dock Sud S.A., and Central Dock Sud S.A. They were all brought in by Endesa S.A., grouped under Cono Sur Participaciones S.L.U. as part of the capital increase carried out by the company (see Notes 4 and 25.1.1).

The entry of these companies into the Enersis Group’s scope of consolidation brought about an increase in the consolidated statement of financial position of ThCh$110,222,618 in current assets, ThCh$163,196,934 in non-current assets, ThCh$180,637,895 in current liabilities, and ThCh$54,241,781 in non-current liabilities.

During 2012 there were no significant changes in the Enersis Group’s scope of consolidation.

The sale of the companies Compañía Americana de Multiservisios (CAM) and Synapsis Servicios y Soluciones Informáticas IT (Synapsis) was completed during the first quarter of 2011. The sale of CAM was concluded on February 24, 2011 for ThCh$6,775,748 (US$14.2 million), while the sale of Synapsis was finalized on March 1, 2011, for ThCh$24,710,920 (US$ 52 million). For more information, see Note 12.

The elimination of CAM and Synapsis from the Enersis scope of consolidation caused reductions in the consolidated statement of financial position of ThCh$80,050,947 in current assets, ThCh$31,003,337 in non-current assets, ThCh$56,359,935 in current liabilities, and ThCh$14,558,579 in non-current liabilities.

2.4.2  Consolidated companies with an ownership interest of less than 50%

Although the Group holds, directly or indirectly, a 48.48% interest in the companies Comercializadora de Energía S.A. (Codensa) and in Empresa Generadora de Energía Eléctrica S.A. (Emgesa), they are considered subsidiaries since Enersis exercises control over the entities through contracts or agreements with shareholders, or as a consequence of their structure, composition, and shareholder classes. The Group holds 57.15% and 56.43% of the voting shares of Codensa and Emgesa, respectively.

2.4.3  Non-consolidated companies with an ownership interest of over 50%

Although the Enersis Group holds more than a 50% interest in Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén S.A. (Aysén), it is considered a “joint venture” since the Group, through contracts or agreements with shareholders, exercises joint control of the company.

2.5 Associated companies and joint arrangements

Associated Companies are those in which Enersis, either directly or indirectly, exercises significant influence.

Significant influence is having the power to influence the financial and operational policy decisions of the associated company without having either sole or joint control of the company. In general, significant influence is assumed to be those cases in which the Group has an ownership interest of over 20% (see Note 3.h).

Joint arrangements are defined as those entities in which the Group exercises control given an agreement with other shareholders and jointly with them, in other words, when decisions on the entities’ relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. Joint arrangements are classified as:

- Joint venture: an agreement under which the parties exercising joint control have rights to the entity’s net assets.

- Joint operation: an agreement under which the parties exercising joint control have rights to the assets and obligations with respect to the liabilities involved in the arrangement. At this time, Enersis does not have any joint arrangements that qualify as joint operations.

F-26

Appendix 3 to these consolidated financial statements, entitled “Associated Companies and Joint Ventures,” describes the relationship of Enersis with each of these companies.

2.6 Basis of consolidation and business combinations

The subsidiaries are consolidated and all their assets, liabilities, income, expenses, and cash flows are included in the consolidated financial statements once the adjustments and eliminations from intra-Group transactions have been made.

The comprehensive income of subsidiaries is included in the consolidated comprehensive income statement from the date that the parent company obtains control of the subsidiary until the date on which it loses control of the subsidiary.

The operations of the parent company and its subsidiaries have been consolidated under the following basic principles:

1. At the date the parent takes control, the subsidiary’s assets acquired and its liabilities assumed are recorded at fair value, except for certain assets and liabilities that are recorded using valuation principles established in other IFRS standards. If, in the parent company’s stake, there is a positive difference between the fair value of the consideration transferred (the acquisition cost) and the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary, including contingent liabilities, this difference is recorded as goodwill. If the difference is negative, the resulting profit is recorded as a credit to income after reevaluating whether all of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed have been correctly identified and following a review of the procedures used to measure these amounts.

For business combinations carried out in stages, the fair value of the stake previously held in the acquired company’s equity is measured on the date of acquisition and any profit or loss is recognized in the results for that fiscal year or in other comprehensive income, as applicable.

2. Non-controlling interests in equity and in the comprehensive income of the consolidated subsidiaries are presented, respectively, under the line items “Total Equity: Non-controlling interests” in the consolidated statement of financial position and “Net Income attributable to non-controlling interests” and “Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests” in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

3. The financial statements of foreign companies with functional currencies other than the Chilean peso are translated as follows:

a. For assets and liabilities, the prevailing exchange rate on the closing date of the financial statements is used.

b. For items in the comprehensive income statement, the average exchange rate for the period is used (unless this average is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative effect of the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the transactions, in which case the exchange rate in effect on the date of each transaction is used).

c. Equity remains at the historical exchange rate from the date of acquisition or contribution, and retained earnings at the average exchange rate at the date of generation.

d. Exchange differences arising in the conversion of financial statements are recognized in the item “Exchange differences on translation” within the consolidated statement of comprehensive income: Other comprehensive income (see Note 25.2).

4. Translation adjustments that existed at Enersis’ transition date to IFRS, on January 1, 2004, were transferred to reserves, using the exemption for that purpose in IFRS 1 “First time Adoption of IFRS” (see Note 25.5).

5. Balances and transactions between consolidated companies were completely eliminated in the consolidation process.

F-27

6. Changes in interests in subsidiaries that do not result in taking or losing control are recorded as equity transactions, and the book value of the controlling and non-controlling interests is adjusted to reflect the change in relative interest in the subsidiary. Any difference that may exist, between the value for which a non-controlling interest is adjusted and the fair value of a compensation paid or received, is recognized directly in Equity attributable to the shareholders of Enersis.

7. Business combinations under common control are recorded using, as a reference, the ‘pooling interest’ method. Under this method, the assets and liabilities involved in the transaction remain reflected at the same book value at which they were recorded in the ultimate controlling company, although subsequent accounting adjustments may need to be made to align the accounting policies of the companies involved.

Any difference between the assets and liabilities contributed to the consolidation and the compensation given is recorded directly in Net equity as a debit or credit to Other reserves. The Group does not apply retrospective accounting records of business combinations under common control.

F-28

3. ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES APPLIED

The main accounting policies used in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements were the following:

a) Property, plant, and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are valued at acquisition cost, net of accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses they may have experienced. In addition to the price paid to acquire each item, the cost also includes, where applicable, the following concepts:

- Financing expenses accrued during the construction period that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction, or production of qualified assets, which require a substantial period of time before being ready for use such as, for example, electricity generation or distribution facilities. The Group defines “substantial period” as one that exceeds 12 months. The interest rate used is that of the specific financing or, if none exists, the mean financing rate of the company carrying out the investment. The mean financing rate depends principally on the geographic area and ranges between 7.25% and 9.31%. The amount capitalized for this concept amounted to ThCh$30,325,539, ThCh$26,477,369, and ThCh$35,945,738 during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively (see Note 32).

- Employee expenses directly related to construction in progress. The amounts capitalized under this concept for the periods ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively, were ThCh$48,087,586, ThCh$32,925,771, and ThCh$31,790,899.

- Future disbursements that the Group will have to make to close their facilities are incorporated into the value of the asset at present value, recording in the accounting the corresponding provision for dismantling or restoration. The Group reviews its estimate of these future disbursements on a yearly basis, increasing or decreasing the value of the asset based on the results of this estimate (see Note 23).

- Items acquired before the Group’s date of transition to IFRS, on January 1, 2004, include in the purchasing cost, where appropriate, asset reappraisals permitted in the various countries to adjust the value of the property, plant, and equipment for inflation as of that date (see Note 25.5).

Items for construction work in progress are transferred to operating assets once the testing period has been completed and they are available for use, at which time depreciation begins.

Expansion, modernization, or improvement costs that represent an increase in productivity, capacity or efficiency, or a longer useful life are capitalized as increasing the cost basis for the corresponding assets.

The replacement or overhaul of entire components that increase the asset’s useful life, or its economic capacity, are recorded as an increase in value for the respective assets, derecognizing the replaced or overhauled components.

Expenses for periodic maintenance, conservation, and repair are recorded directly in income as an expense for the year in which they are incurred.

The Company, based on the outcome of impairment testing explained in Note 3.e), considers that the book value of assets does not exceed their net recoverable value.

Property, plant, and equipment, net of its residual value, is depreciated by distributing the cost of the different items that comprise it on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life, which is the period during which the companies expect to use the assets. Useful life estimates and residual values are periodically reviewed and, if appropriate, adjusted prospectively.

F-29

The following are the main categories of Property, plant, and equipment with their respective estimated useful lives:

Categories of Property, plant, and equipment	Years of estimated useful life
Buildings	22 - 100
Plant and equipment	3 - 65
IT equipment	3 - 15
Fixtures and fittings	5 - 21
Motor vehicles	5 - 10
Other	2 - 33

Additionally, the following provides greater detail on the useful lives of plant and equipment items:

	Years of estimated useful life
Generating facilities:
Hydroelectric plants
Civil engineering works	35-65
Electromechanical equipment	10-40
Coal-fired /fuel-oil power plants	25-40
Combined cycle plants	10-25
Renewable energy power plants	35
Transmission and distribution facilities:
High-voltage network	10-60
Low- and medium-voltage network	10-60
Measuring and remote control equipment	3-50
Other facilities	4-25

Land is not depreciated since it has an indefinite useful life.

Regarding the administrative concessions held by the Group’s electric companies, the following lists the periods remaining until expiration for the concessions that do not have an indefinite term:

Concession holder and operator	Country	Concession term	Period remaining to expiration
Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A. - Edesur (Distribution)	Argentina	95 years	74 years
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. (Generation)	Argentina	30 years	10 years
Transportadora de Energía S.A. (Transmission)	Argentina	85 years	74 years
Compañía de Transmisión del Mercosur S.A. (Transmission)	Argentina	87 years	74 years
Central Eléctrica Cachoeira Dourada S.A. (Generation)	Brazil	30 years	14 years
Central Generadora Termoeléctrica Fortaleza S.A. (Generation)	Brazil	30 years	18 years
Compañía de Interconexión Energética S.A. (CIEN - Line 1)	Brazil	20 years	7 years
Compañía de Interconexión Energética S.A. CIEN - Line 2)	Brazil	20 years	9 years

F-30

The Group’s management evaluated the specific contract terms of each of the aforementioned concessions, which vary by country, business activity, and jurisprudence, and concluded that, with the exception of CIEN, there are no determining factors indicating that the grantor, which in every case is a government entity, controls the infrastructure and, at the same time, can continuously set the price to be charged for services. These requirements are essential for applying IFRIC 12 “Service Concession Agreements,” an interpretation that establishes how to record and value certain types of concessions (see Note 3.d.1 for concession agreements within the scope of IFRIC 12).

On April 19, 2011, the subsidiary CIEN successfully completed the change in business model that we had previously been reporting. Under the new agreement, the Government continues to control the infrastructure, but CIEN receives fixed payments, which puts it on an equal footing with a public transmission concession (with regulated prices).

Under this business model, its concessions fall within the scope of Standard IFRIC 12, but the infrastructure has not been derecognized due to the fact that CIEN has not substantially transferred the significant risks and benefits to the Brazilian Government.

Concession contracts not covered under IFRIC 12 are recognized according to general criteria. To the extent that the Group recognizes assets as Property, plant, and equipment, they are amortized over their economic life or the concession term, whichever is shorter. Any required investment, improvement, or replacement made by the Group is calculated as an impairment to Property, plant, and equipment as a future contractual cash outflow that is necessary to obtain future cash inflow.

Gains or losses that arise from the sale or disposal of items of Property, plant and equipment are recognized as Other gains (losses) in the comprehensive income statement and are calculated by deducting the net book value of the asset and any sales expenses from the amount received in the sale.

b) Investment property

“Investment property” includes primarily land and buildings held for the purpose of earning rental income and/or for capital appreciation.

Investment property is valued at acquisition cost less any accumulated depreciation and impairment losses that have been incurred. Investment property, excluding land, is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the useful lives of the related assets.

The breakdown of the fair value of investment property is detailed in Note 17.

c) Goodwill

Goodwill generated on consolidated acquired business represents the difference between the acquisition cost and the Group’s share of the fair value of assets and liabilities, including identifiable contingent liabilities and the non-controlling stake in a subsidiary at the acquisition date.

Assets acquired and liabilities assumed are temporarily valued as of the date the company takes control and are reviewed within no more than a year after the acquisition date. Until the fair value of assets and liabilities is ultimately determined, the difference between the acquisition price and the book value of the acquired company is temporarily recorded as goodwill.

If goodwill is finally determined as existing in the financial statements the year following the acquisition, the prior year’s accounts, which are presented for comparison purposes, are modified to include the value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and of the definitive goodwill from the acquisition date.

F-31

Goodwill generated from acquiring companies with functional currencies other than the Chilean peso is valued in the functional currency of the acquired company and converted to Chilean pesos using the exchange rate in effect as of the date of the statement of financial position.

Goodwill generated before the date of transition to IFRS, on January 1, 2004, is maintained at its net value recorded as of that date, while goodwill originated afterwards is valued at acquisition cost (see Notes 15 and 25.5).

Goodwill is not amortized; instead, at each period end the Company estimates whether any impairment has reduced its recoverable value to an amount less than the net recorded cost and, if so, it immediately adjusts for impairment (see Note 3.e).

d) Intangible assets other than goodwill

Intangible assets are initially recognized at their acquisition cost or production cost, and are subsequently valued at their cost, net of their accumulated amortization and of the impairment losses they may have experienced.

Intangible assets are amortized on a straight line basis during their useful life, starting from the time that they are in usable condition, except for those with an indefinite useful life, which are not amortized. As of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012, there were no significant amounts in intangible assets with an indefinite useful life.

The criteria for recognizing these assets’ impairment losses and, if applicable, recovery of impairment losses recorded in previous fiscal years are explained in letter e) of this Note.

    d.1) Concessions

Public-to-private service concession agreements are recorded according to IFRIC 12, “Service Concession Agreements.” This accounting interpretation applies if:

a) The grantor controls or regulates which services the operator should provide with the infrastructure, to whom it must provide them, and at what price; and

b) The grantor controls – through ownership, beneficial entitlement, or otherwise – any significant residual interest in the infrastructure at the end of the term of the agreement.

If both of the above conditions are met simultaneously, the consideration received by the Group for the infrastructure construction is recognized at its fair value, as either an intangible asset when the Group receives the right to charge users of the public service, as long as these charges are conditional on the degree to which the service is used; or as a financial asset when the Group has an unconditional contractual right to receive cash or another financial asset directly from the grantor or from a third party. The Group recognizes the contractual obligations assumed for maintenance of the infrastructure during its use, or for its return to the grantor at the end of the concession agreement within the conditions specified in the agreement, as long as it does not involve an activity that generates income, in accordance with the Group’s provision accounting policy (see Note 3.l).

Finance expenses attributable to the concession agreements are capitalized based on criteria established in Note 3 a) above, provided that the Group has a contractual right to receive an intangible asset. No finance expenses were capitalized during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011.

Additionally, during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, employee expenses directly attributable to construction in progress, amounting to ThCh$13,877,942, ThCh$15,741,611, and ThCh$18,130,297, respectively, were capitalized.

F-32

The Enersis subsidiaries that have recognized an intangible asset from their service concession agreements are the following:

Concession holder and operator	Country	Concession term	Period remaining to expiration
Ampla Energía e Serviços S.A. (*) (Distribution)	Brazil	30 years	13 years
Companhia Energética do Ceará S.A. (*) (Distribution)	Brazil	30 years	14 years
Concesionaria Túnel El Melón S.A (Highway infrastructure)	Chile	23 years	2.5 years

(*) Given that part of the rights acquired by our subsidiaries are unconditional, an available-for-sale financial asset has been recognized for the sale (see Notes 3.g.1 and 8).

d.2)  Research and development expenses

The Group follows the policy of recording the costs incurred in a project’s development phase as intangible assets in the statement of financial position as long as the project’s technical viability and economic returns are reasonably assured.

Expenditures on research activities are recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred. These expenses amounted to ThCh$1,996,818, ThCh$2,298,344, and ThCh$2,104,631, at December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

d.3)  Other intangible assets

These intangible assets correspond primarily to computer software, water rights, and easements. They are initially recognized at acquisition or production cost and are subsequently measured at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses, if any.

Computer software programs are amortized, on average, over five years. Certain easements and water rights have indefinite useful lives and are therefore not amortized, while others have useful lives ranging from 40 to 60 years, depending on their characteristics, and they are amortized over that term.

e)   Asset impairment

e.1) Non-financial assets (except inventory and deferred tax assets)

During the year, and principally at year-end, the Company evaluates whether there is any indication that an asset has been impaired. Should any such indication exist, the company estimates the recoverable amount of that asset to determine the amount of impairment in each case. In the case of identifiable assets that do not generate cash flows independently, the company estimates the recoverability of the Cash Generating Unit (CGU) to which the asset belongs, which is understood to be the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates independent cash inflows.

Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, in the case of Cash Generating Units to which goodwill or intangible assets with an indefinite useful life have been allocated, a recoverability analysis is performed routinely at each period end.

The recoverable amount is the greater amount between the fair value less the cost needed to sell and the value in use, which is defined as the present value of the estimated future cash flows. In order to calculate the recoverable value of Property, plant, and equipment, as well as of goodwill, and intangible assets, the Group uses value in use criteria in practically all cases.

F-33

To estimate the value in use, the Group prepares future cash flow projections, before tax, based on the most recent budgets available. These budgets incorporate management’s best estimates of Cash Generating Units’ revenue and costs using sector projections, past experience, and future expectations.

In general, these projections cover the next ten years, estimating cash flows for subsequent years by applying reasonable growth rates which, in no case, are increasing nor exceed the average long-term growth rates for the particular sector and country. At the end of 2013, 2012, and 2011, projections were extrapolated from the following rates:

Country	Currency	Growth rates (g)
		2013	2012	2011
Chile	Chilean peso	2.2% - 5.3%	2.3% - 5.2%	4.2% - 5.3%
Argentina	Argentine peso	8.6% - 9.0%	8.6% - 9.5%	7.0% - 7.9%
Brazil	Brazilian real	5.1% - 6.1%	5.1% - 6.1%	5.0% - 6.0%
Peru	Peruvian nuevo sol	3.6% - 4.6%	3.7% - 4.9%	3.2% - 4.3%
Colombia	Colombian peso	4.3% - 5.3%	4.3% - 5.3%	4.4% - 5.2%

These flows are discounted to calculate their current value at a before-tax rate that covers the cost of capital for the business activity and the geographic area in which it is being carried out. The current cost of money and the risk premiums generally used among analysts for the business activity and the geographic zone are taken into account to calculate this value.

The following are the before-tax discount rates applied in 2013, 2012, and 2011, expressed in nominal terms:

Country	Currency	2013		2012		2011
		Minimum	Maximum	Minimum	Maximum	Minimum	Maximum
Chile	Chilean peso	7.8%	16.3%	8.0%	14.6%	8.0%	10.1%
Argentina	Argentine peso	39.2%	44.4%	26.0%	29.0%	23.0%	26.0%
Brasil	Brazilian real	9.0%	18.8%	9.5%	18.0%	9.5%	11.6%
Peru	Peruvian nuevo sol	7.3%	13.9%	7.6%	12.5%	7.3%	9.3%
Colombia	Colombian peso	8.5%	14.2%	8.4%	14.5%	8.9%	10.9%

If the recoverable amount of the CGU is less than the net carrying amount of the asset, the corresponding provision for impairment loss is recorded for the difference, and charged to “Reversal of impairment loss (impairment loss) recognized in profit or loss” in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. The provision is first allocated to the CGU’s goodwill value, if any, and then to the other assets comprising it, prorated according to the carrying value of each one, limited to its fair value less sales costs, or its value in use; a negative value may not be obtained.

Impairment losses recognized for an asset in prior periods are reversed when its estimated recoverable amount changes, increasing the asset’s value with a credit to earnings, limited to the asset’s carrying amount if no adjustment had occurred. In the case of goodwill, adjustments that would have been made are not reversible.

e.2) Financial assets

The following procedure is used to determine the need to adjust financial assets for impairment:

-    In the case of commercial assets, provisions are made for the balances for which there is objective evidence that Enersis will not be able to recover all of the amounts provided for in the original terms and conditions of the contracts. In general, the Group’s policy is to record impairment through an allowance account based on the age of past-due balances, except in those cases where a specific collectability analysis is recommended, such as in the case of receivables from publically-owned companies (see Note 8).

-    In the case of receivables of a financial nature, impairment is determined on case-by-case basis. As of the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements, the Company had no significant past-due non-commercial financial assets (see Notes 7 and 21).

F-34

f)    Leases

In order to determine whether a contract is, or contains, a lease, Enersis examines the economic basis of agreement, to assess whether fulfillment of the contract depends on the use of a specific asset and whether the agreement transfers the right to the use of the asset. If both conditions are met, at the beginning of the contract the Company separates the payments and considerations relating to the lease, at their fair values, from those corresponding to the other components of the agreement.

Leases that substantially transfer all of the risks and benefits inherent to the property are classified as finance leases. All others are classified as operating leases.

Finance leases in which the Group acts as a lessee are recognized when the agreement begins. At that time, the Group records an asset based on the nature of the lease and a liability for the same amount, equal to the fair value of the leased asset or the present value of the minimum lease payments, if the latter is lower. Subsequently, the minimum lease payments are divided between finance expense and principal reduction. The finance expense is recorded in the income statement and distributed over the lease term, so as to obtain a constant interest rate for each period over the balance of the debt pending amortization. The asset depreciates on the same terms as other similar depreciable assets, as long as there is reasonable certainty that the lessee will acquire ownership of the asset at the end of the lease. If no such certainty exists, the asset depreciates over the shorter term between the useful life of the asset and the term of the lease.

Operating lease payments are expensed on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease unless another type of systematic basis of distribution is deemed more representative.

g)    Financial instruments

Financial instruments are contracts that give rise to both a financial asset in one company and a financial liability or equity instrument in another company.

g.1)    Financial assets other than derivatives

The Group classifies its financial assets other than derivatives, whether permanent or temporary, except for investments accounted for using the equity method (see Note 13) and those held for sale (Note 12), into four categories:

- Trade and other current receivables and Accounts receivable from related companies: These are recorded at amortized cost, which is the initial fair value less principal repayments made, plus accrued and uncharged interest, calculated using the effective interest method.

The effective interest method is used to calculate the amortized cost of a financial asset or liability (or group of financial assets or financial liabilities) and is charged to finance income or cost over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the discount rate that exactly matches the estimated cash flows to be received or paid over the expected life of the financial instrument (or, when appropriate, over a shorter period) to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or financial liability.

- Held-to-maturity investments: Investments that the Group intends to hold and is capable of holding until their maturity is accounted for at amortized cost as defined in the preceding paragraph.

F-35

- Financial assets at fair value with changes in net income: This includes the trading portfolio and those financial assets that have been designated as such upon initial recognition and that are managed and evaluated using fair value criteria. They are valued in the consolidated statement of financial position at fair value, with changes in value recorded directly in income when they occur.

- Available-for-sale financial assets: These are financial assets specifically designated as available for sale or that do not fit within any of the three preceding categories. They are almost all financial investments in equity instruments (see Note 7).

These investments are recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position at fair value when it can be reliably determined. For interests in unlisted companies or companies with very little liquidity, normally the fair value cannot be reliably determined. When this occurs, those interests are valued at acquisition cost or a lesser amount if evidence of impairment exists.

Changes in fair value, net of tax, are recorded in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income: Other comprehensive results, until the investments are disposed of, at which time the amount accumulated in this account for that investment is fully charged to the period’s profit or loss.

Should the fair value be less than the acquisition cost, and if there is objective evidence that the asset has been more than temporarily impaired, the difference is recorded directly in the period’s losses.

Purchases and sales of financial assets are accounted for using their trade date.

g.2)    Cash and cash equivalents

This account within the statement of consolidated financial position includes cash and bank balances, time deposits, and other highly liquid investments (with a maturity of 90 days or less from the time of investment) that are readily convertible to cash and are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value.

g.3)    Financial liabilities other than derivatives

Financial liabilities are generally recorded based on cash received, net of any costs incurred in the transaction. In subsequent periods, these obligations are valued at their amortized cost, using the effective interest rate method (see Note 3.g.1).

In the particular case that a liability is the underlying item of a fair value hedge derivative, as an exception, such liability will be valued at its fair value for the portion of the hedged risk.

In order to calculate the fair value of debt, both in the cases when it is recorded in the statement of financial position and for fair value disclosure purposes as seen in Note 21, debt has been divided into fixed interest rate debt (hereinafter “fixed-rate debt”) and variable interest rate debt (hereinafter “floating-rate debt”). Fixed-rate debt is that on which fixed-interest coupons established at the beginning of the transaction are paid explicitly or implicitly over its term. Floating-rate debt is that issued at a variable interest rate, i.e., each coupon is established at the beginning of each period based on the reference interest rate. All debt has been valued by discounting expected future cash flows with a market-interest rate curve based on the payment’s currency.

g.4)    Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting

Derivatives held by the Group are primarily transactions entered into to hedge interest and/or exchange rate risk, intended to eliminate or significantly reduce these risks in the underlying transactions being hedged.

Derivatives are recorded at fair value as of the date of the statement of financial position as follows: if their fair value is positive, they are recorded within “Other financial assets”; and if their fair value is negative, they are recorded within “Other financial liabilities.” For derivatives on commodities, the positive value is recorded in “Trade and other current receivables,” and negative values are recorded in “Trade and other current liabilities.”

F-36

Changes in fair value are recorded directly in income except when the derivative has been designated for accounting purposes as a hedge instrument and all of the conditions established under IFRS for applying hedge accounting are met, including that the hedge be highly effective. In this case, changes are recorded as follows:

- Fair value hedges: The underlying portion for which the risk is being hedged is valued at its fair value, as is the hedge instrument, and any changes in the value of both are recorded in the comprehensive income statement by netting the effects in the same comprehensive income statement account.

- Cash flow hedges: Changes in the fair value of the effective portion of derivatives are recorded in an equity reserve known as “Reserve for cash flow hedges.” The cumulative loss or gain in this account is transferred to the comprehensive income statement to the extent that the underlying item impacts the comprehensive income statement because of the hedged risk, netting the effect in the same comprehensive income statement account. Gains or losses from the ineffective portion of the hedge are recorded directly in the comprehensive income statement.

A hedge is considered highly effective when changes in the fair value or in the cash flows of the underlying item directly attributable to the hedged risk are offset by changes in the fair value or the cash flows of the hedging instrument, with effectiveness ranging from 80% to 125%.

The Company does not apply hedge accounting to its investments abroad.

As a general rule, long-term commodity purchase or sale agreements are recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position at their fair value as of period end, recording any differences in value directly in income, except when all of the following conditions are met:

- The sole purpose of the agreement is for the Group’s own use.

- The Group’s future projections justify the existence of these agreements for its own use.

- Past experience with agreements shows that they have been utilized for the Group’s own use, except in certain isolated cases when they had to be used for exceptional reasons or reasons associated with logistical issues beyond the control and projection of the Group.

- The agreement does not stipulate settlement by differences and the parties have not made it a practice to settle similar contracts by differences in the past.

The long-term commodity purchase or sale agreements maintained by the Group, which are mainly for electricity, fuel, and other supplies, meet the conditions described above. Thus, the purpose of fuel purchase agreements is to use them to generate electricity, the electricity purchase contracts are used to make sales to end-customers, and the electricity sale contracts are used to sell the company’s own product.

The Company also evaluates the existence of derivatives embedded in contracts or financial instruments to determine if their characteristics and risk are closely related to the principal contract, provided that when taken together they are not being accounted for at fair value. If they are not closely related, they are recorded separately and changes in value are accounted for directly in the comprehensive income statement.

F-37

g.5) Fair value measurement and classification of financial instruments

The fair value of the various derivative financial instruments is calculated as follows:

- For derivatives traded on an active market, by its quoted price as of year-end.

- The Group values derivatives not traded on active markets by using the discounted cash flow method and generally accepted options valuation models, based on current and future market conditions as of year-end.

Based on the hierarchy of the inputs used these procedures, the Group classifies financial instruments at the following levels

Level 1:	Quoted price (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2:	Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices). The methods and hypotheses used to determine the fair values at level 2 by type of financial assets or financial liabilities take into consideration estimated future cash flows discounted with the zero coupon interest rate curves for each currency. All of these valuations are carried out using external tools, such as Bloomberg; and
Level 3:	Inputs for assets or liabilities that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).

g.6) Derecognition of financial assets and liabilities

Financial assets are derecognized when:

- The contractual rights to receive cash flows related to the financial asset expire or have been transferred or, if the contractual rights are retained, the Group has assumed a contractual obligation to pay these cash flows to one or more receivers.

- The Group has substantially transferred the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset, or, if it has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards, when it does not retain control over the asset.

Transactions in which the Group retains substantially all the inherent risks and rewards of ownership of the transferred asset, it continues recognizing the transferred asset in its entirety and recognizes a financial liability for the consideration received. Transactions costs are recognized in profit and loss by using the effective interest method (see Note 3.g.1).

Financial liabilities are derecognized when they are extinguished, that is, when the obligation arising from the liability has been paid or cancelled, or has expired.

h)   Investments accounted for using the equity method

The Group’s interests in joint ventures and associates are recorded using the equity method

Under the equity method, an investment in an associate or joint venture is initially recorded at cost. As of the acquisition date, the investment is recorded in the statement of financial position based on the share of its equity that the Group’s interest represents in its capital, adjusted for, if appropriate, the effect of transactions with subsidiaries plus any goodwill generated in acquiring the company. If the resulting amount is negative, zero is recorded for that investment in the statement of financial position, unless the Group has a present obligation (either legal or implicit) to support the company’s negative equity situation, in which case a provision is recorded.

F-38

Goodwill from the associate or joint venture is included in the book value of the investment. It is not amortized, nor is it subject to individual impairment testing.

Dividends received from these companies are deducted from the value of the investment, and any profit or loss obtained from them to which the Group is entitled based on its interest is recorded under “Share of profit (loss) of associates accounted for using equity method.”

Appendix No. 3, “Enersis Group Associated Companies and Joint Ventures,” included in these consolidated financial statements, provides information about the relationship of Enersis with each of these entities.

i)    Inventories

Inventories are valued at their weighted average acquisition price or the net realizable value, whichever is lower.

j)    Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations

The Group classifies the following as “Non-current assets held for sale:” property, plant, and equipment; intangible assets; investments accounted for using the equity method, joint ventures, and disposal groups (a group of assets to be disposed of and the liabilities directly associated with those assets), if as of the date of the consolidated financial statements the Group has taken active measures for their sale and estimates that such a sale is highly probable.

These held-for-sale assets or disposal groups are valued at the lower of their book value or estimated sale value less selling costs. Depreciation and amortization on these assets cease when they meet the criteria to be classified as non-current assets held for sale.

Non-current assets held for sale and the components of the disposal groups classified as held for sale are presented in the consolidated statement of financial position as a single line item within assets called “Non-current assets or disposal groups classified as held for sale,” and the respective liabilities are presented as a single line item within liabilities called “Liabilities included in disposal groups classified as held for sale.”

The Group classifies as “Discontinued operations” those separate major lines of business that have been sold or disposed of in another way, or those that may be classified as held for sale, including other assets that are part of the same coordinated sales or disposal plan. In the same way, entities that have been acquired solely in order to be resold are also considered “Discontinued operations.”

The components of profit or loss after taxes from discontinued operations are presented as a single line item in the consolidated comprehensive income statement as “Net income from discontinued operations.

k)   Treasury shares

Treasury shares are deducted from equity in the consolidated statement of financial position and valued at acquisition cost.

The gains and losses from the disposal of treasury shares are recorded directly in “Equity – Retained earnings”, without affecting the profit or loss for the fiscal year. As of December 31, 2013, there are no treasury shares, and no transactions with treasury shares were made during the 2013, 2012, or 2011 fiscal years.

l)    Provisions

Obligations existing as of the date of the consolidated financial statements resulting from past events which may negatively impact the Group’s equity, and whose amount and timing of payment are uncertain, are recorded as provisions in the consolidated statement of financial position at the present value of the most likely amount that it is believed that the Group will have to disburse to settle the obligation.

F-39

Provisions are quantified using the best information available as of the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements regarding the consequences of the event causing the provision and are re-estimated at each subsequent accounting close.

l.1)   Provisions for post-employment benefits and similar obligations

Some of the Group’s subsidiaries have pension and similar obligations to their employees. Such obligations, which combine defined benefits and defined contributions, are basically formalized through pension plans, except for certain non-monetary benefits, mainly electricity supply commitments, which, due to their nature, have not been externalized and are covered by the related in-house provisions.

For defined benefit plans, the cost of providing benefits is determined using the Projected Unit Credit Method, with actuarial valuations being carried out at the end of each reporting period. Past service costs relating to changes in benefits are recognized immediately.

The defined benefit plan obligations in the statement of financial position represent the present value of the accrued obligations, adjusted, once the fair value of the different plans’ assets has been deducted, if applicable.

For each of the plans, any positive difference between the actuarial liability for past services and the plan assets is recognized under line item “Provisions for employee benefits” within current and non-current liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position, and any negative difference is recognized under line item “Other financial assets” within non-current assets in the consolidated statement of financial position, provided that the negative difference is recoverable by the Group, usually through a reduction in future contributions and taking into consideration the limit established in IFRIC 14, “IAS 19The limit on a defined benefit asset, minimum funding requirements, and their interaction.”

Actuarial gains and losses arising in the measurement of both the plan liabilities and the plan assets, including the limit in IFRIC 14, are recognized in Other Comprehensive Income and then reclassified under “Equity - Retained earnings.”

Contributions to defined contribution benefit plans are recognized as an expense in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income when the employees have rendered their services.

m)  Conversion of balances in foreign currency

Transactions carried out by each company in a currency other than its functional currency are recorded using the exchange rates in effect as of the date of each transaction. During the year, any differences that arise between the exchange rate recorded in accounting and the rate prevailing as of the date of collection or payment are recorded as “Foreign currency exchange differences” in the comprehensive income statement.

Likewise, at the end of each period, balances receivable or payable in a currency other than each company’s functional currency are converted using the period-end exchange rate. Any valuation differences are recorded as “Foreign currency exchange differences” in the comprehensive income statement.

The Group has established a policy to hedge the portion of its subsidiaries’ revenue that is directly linked to variations in the US dollar by obtaining financing in this currency. Exchange differences related to this debt, as they are cash flow hedge transactions, are charged, net of taxes, to a reserve account in equity and recorded in income during the period in which the hedged cash flows are realized. This term has been estimated at ten years.

F-40

n)   Current/non-current classification

In these consolidated statements of financial position, assets and liabilities expected to be recovered or settled within twelve months are presented as current items, except for post-employment and other similar obligations, and those assets and liabilities expected to be recovered or settled in more than twelve months are presented as non-current items.

Should the Company have any obligations that mature in less than twelve months but can be refinanced over the long term at the Company’s discretion, through unconditionally available credit agreements with long-term maturities, such obligations could be classified as long-term liabilities.

o)   Income tax

Income tax expense for the period is determined as the sum of current taxes from the Group’s different subsidiaries and results from applying the tax rate to the taxable base for the period, after allowable deductions have been made, plus any changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities and tax credits, both for tax losses and deductions. Differences between the book value and tax basis of assets and liabilities generate deferred tax asset and liability balances, which are calculated using tax rates expected to be in effect when the assets and liabilities are realized or settled. Considered for this purpose are rates that have been approved by the end of the period reported on, or whose approval process is practically complete.

Current taxes and changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities not arising from business combinations are recorded in income or in equity in the statement of financial position, based on where the gains or losses originating them were recorded.

Deferred tax assets and tax credits are recognized only when it is likely that future tax gains will be sufficient to recover deductions for temporary differences and make use of tax credits.

Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for all temporary differences, except those derived from the initial recognition of goodwill and those that arose from valuing investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures in which the Group can control their reversal and where it is likely that they will not be reversed in the foreseeable future.

Any deductions that can be applied to current tax liabilities are credited to earnings within the line item “Income tax expenses”, except when doubts exist about their tax realization, in which case they are not recognized until they are effectively realized, or when they correspond to specific tax incentives, in which case they are recorded as grants.

At each accounting period close, the Company reviews the deferred taxes it has recorded, both assets and liabilities, in order to ensure they remain current and otherwise make any necessary corrections based on the results of this analysis.

p)   Revenue and expense recognition

Revenues and expenses are recognized on an accrual basis.

Revenue is recognized when the gross inflow of economic benefits arising in the course of the Group’s ordinary activities in the period occurs, provided that this inflow of economic benefits results in an increase in total equity that is not related to contributions from equity participants and that these benefits can be measured reliably. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable that gives rise to the revenue.

Revenue associated with the rendering of services is only recognized if it can be estimated reliably, based on the stage of completion of the service rendered at the date of the statement of financial position.

F-41

The Group excludes from the revenue figure gross inflows of economic benefits it receives when it acts as an agent or commission agent on behalf of third parties, and only recognizes as revenue economic benefits received for its own account.

When goods or services are exchanged or swapped for goods or services of a similar nature and value, the exchange is not regarded as a revenue-generating transaction.

The Group records the net amount of non-financial asset purchase or sale contracts settled for the net amount of cash or through some other financial instruments. Contracts entered into and maintained for the purpose of receiving or delivering these non-financial assets are recognized on the basis of the contractual terms of the purchase, sale, or usage requirements expected by the entity.

Interest income (expense) is recognized at the effective interest rate applicable to the outstanding principal over the repayment period.

These criteria for recognizing revenues and expenses are applied throughout the Enersis Group’s lines of business.

q)   Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income attributable to shareholders of the Parent Company (the numerator) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period, excluding the average number of shares of the Parent Company held by the Group, if any.

During the 2013, 2012, and 2011 fiscal years, the Group did not engage in any transaction of any kind with potential dilutive effects leading to diluted earnings per share that could differ from basic earnings per share.

r)   Dividends

Article 79 of the Chilean Companies Act establishes that, unless unanimously agreed otherwise by the shareholders of all issued shares, listed corporations must distribute a cash dividend to shareholders on a yearly basis, prorated by the shares owned or the proportion established in the company’s by-laws if there are preferred shares, of at least 30% of net income for each period, except when accumulated losses from prior years must be absorbed.

As it is practically impossible to achieve a unanimous agreement given Enersis’ highly fragmented share capital, as of the end of each year the amount of the dividend obligation to its shareholders is determined, net of interim dividends approved during the fiscal year, and then accounted for in “Trade and other current payables” and “Accounts payable to related companies,” as appropriate, and charged to Equity.

Interim and final dividends are deducted from Equity as soon as they are approved by the competent body, which in the first case is normally the Company’s Board of Directors and in the second case is the Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting.

s)   Systems of share-based remunerations

When Group employees take part in remuneration plans tied to the price of Enel stock, and the cost of the plan is borne by this company, the Group records the fair value of the Enel liability as an expense for employee benefits. At the same time, an increase is recorded to equity under Other Reserves for the same amount, representing Enel’s contribution (see Note 9.3).

F-42

t)   Share issuance and placement expenses

Share issuance and placement expenses, when these are incremental expenses directly attributable to the transaction, are recognized directly in net equity as a deduction from “Share premiums,” net of any applicable taxes. If the share premium account has a zero balance or if the costs described exceed the balance, they are recognized in “Other reserves.”

u)  Cash flow statement

The cash flow statement reflects changes in cash that took place during the period, determined with the direct method. It uses the following expressions and corresponding meanings:

- Cash flows: inflows and outflows of cash or cash equivalents, which are defined as highly liquid investments maturing in less than three months with a low risk of changes in value.

- Operating activities: the principal revenue-producing activities of the Group and other activities that cannot be considered investing or financing activities.

- Investment activities: the acquisition and disposal of long-term assets and other investments not included in cash and cash equivalents.

- Financing activities: activities that result in changes in the size and composition of the total equity and borrowings of the Group.

F-43

4. CAPITAL INCREASE

The Enersis capital increase approved by the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting on December 20, 2012 was completed in the first quarter of 2013; all of the allocated shares were subscribed (see Note 25.1.1).

This capital increase amounted to ChTh$2,845,858,393. Of this, 60.62% of the shares were subscribed by Endesa S.A. and were paid for with its investments in Latin America valued at ThCh$1,724,400,000. The remaining shares were subscribed and paid with non-controlling interests of Enersis via cash payments of ThCh$1,121,458,393, which included a share issuance premium of ChTh1,460,503.

Endesa’s contribution was made by transferring all of its shares in Cono Sur Participaciones, S.L., so that all of that corporation’s assets and liabilities, representing holdings in Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Peru, were incorporated into Enersis.

The following table summarizes the interests contributed by Endesa S.A.:

i) Contributions in companies that Enersis controlled before the transaction:

Company	Percentage contributed
Empresa Distribuidora S.A.	6.23%
Endesa Brasil S.A.	28.48%
Ampla Energía y Servicos S.A:	7.70%
Ampla Investimentos y Servicos S.A.	7.70%
Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A.	4.38%
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	21.60%
Codensa S.A. E.S.P.	26.66%
Inversiones Distrilima S.A.	34.83%

These contributions were recorded using the accounting criteria established in Note 2.6.6, and resulted in a charge of ThCh$947,982,284 to Other miscellaneous reserves in Enersis’ Net equity. This amount is the difference between the economic and accounting values of the stakes transferred by Endesa S.A. on the date of the transaction.

Components of other comprehensive income have also been redistributed as needed, with an additional ThCh$41,885,724 charged to Other miscellaneous reserves and credited to Reserve for exchange differences in translation. This redistribution, based on the prorated stakes contributed by Endesa S.A., has assigned to Enersis’ shareholders their share of Reserve for differences in translation that, prior to the transaction, was assigned to non-controlling interests.

ii) Contributions in companies that Enersis did not control or in which it did not hold a stake prior to the transaction:

Company	Percentage contributed     (directly and indirectly)
Eléctrica Cabo Blanco S.A.C.	100.00%
Endesa Cemsa S.A.	55.00%
Generalima S.A.C.	100.00%
Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A.	96.50%
Inversora Dock Sud S.A.	57.14%
Central Dock Sud S.A.	39.99%
Yacylec S.A.	22.22%

These contributions were recorded using the accounting criteria established in Note 2.6.7 and resulted in a ThCh$92,011,899 credit to Other miscellaneous reserves in Enersis’ Net equity. The amount is the difference between the economic and accounting values of the stakes transferred by Endesa S.A. on the date of the transaction.

F-44

The following table summarizes the effects of the capital increase on Enersis’ Consolidated Statement of Financial Position on the date of the transaction:

	Cash Contribution		Contribution in previously controlled companies		Contribution in companies not previously controlled or in which no stake was held		Total effects on March 31, 2013
ASSETS		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Current assets		1,121,458,393		-		189,506,588		1,310,964,981
Non-current assets		-		-		161,105,667		161,105,667
TOTAL ASSETS		1,121,458,393		-		350,612,254		1,472,070,647
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities		-		-		180,637,894		180,637,894
Non-current liabilities		-		-		54,241,781		54,241,781
TOTAL LIABILITIES		-		-		234,879,675		234,879,675
EQUITY
Capital Increase		1,119,997,890		1,692,613,860		31,786,140		2,844,397,890
Share premiums from Capital Increase (other Reserves)		1,460,503		-		-		1,460,503
Other miscellaneous reserves		-		(989,868,008)		92,011,899		(897,856,109)
Exchange differences in translation				41,885,724				41,885,724
Equity attributable to shareholders of Enersis		1,121,458,393		744,631,576		123,798,039		1,989,888,008
Non-controlling interests		-		(744,631,576)		(8,065,460)		(752,697,036)
TOTAL EQUITY		1,121,458,393		-		115,732,579		1,237,190,972
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY		1,121,458,393		-		350,612,254		1,472,070,647

Share issuance and placement costs amounted to ThCh$23,592,387 and, as indicated in Note 3.t), were recorded in Other miscellaneous reserves (see Note 25.5.c.2).

The amount of net income attributable to shareholders of Enersis from participation acquired as a result of the increase in capital included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2013 was ThCh$126,280,714.

F-45

5. SECTOR REGULATION AND ELECTRICITY SYSTEM OPERATIONS

There are different regulations in the Latin American countries in which the Group operates. The main characteristics of each business are discussed below.

5.1 Generation:

Chile

In Chile, the electricity sector is regulated by the General Law of Electrical Services (Chilean Electricity Law), also known as DFL No. 1 of 1982, of the Ministry of Mining—whose compiled and coordinated text was established in DFL No. 4 issued in 2006 by the Ministry of Economy (the Electricity Law)—as well as by an associated Regulation (D.S. No. 327 issued in 1998). Three government bodies are primarily responsible for enforcing this law: the National Energy Commission (CNE), which has the authority to propose regulated tariffs (node prices) and to draw up indicative plans for the construction of new generating units; the Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels (SEF), which supervises and oversees compliance with the laws, regulations, and technical standards that govern the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity, as well as liquid fuels, and gas; and, finally, the recently created Ministry of Energy, which is responsible for proposing and guiding public policies on energy matters. It also oversees the SEF, the CNE, and the Chilean Commission for Nuclear Energy (ChCNE), thus strengthening coordination and allowing for an integrated view of the energy sector. The Ministry of Energy also includes the Agency for Energy Efficiency and the Center for Renewable Energy. The Chilean Electricity Law has also established a Panel of Experts whose main task is to resolve potential discrepancies among the players in the electricity market, including electricity companies, system operators, regulators, etc.

From a physical view point, the Chilean electrical sector is divided into four electrical grids: theSistema Interconectado Central (SIC),the Sistema Interconectado del Norte Grande (SING), and two separate medium-size grids located in southern Chile, one in Aysén and the other in Magallanes. The SIC, the main electrical grid, runs 2,400 km longitudinally and connects the country from Taltal in the north to Quellon, on the island of Chiloe in the south. The SING covers the northern part of the country, from Arica down to Coloso, covering a length of some 700 km.

The electricity industry is organized into three business segments: generation, transmission, and distribution, all operating in an interconnected and coordinated manner, and whose main purpose is to supply electrical energy to the market at minimum cost while maintaining the quality and safety service standards required by the electrical regulations. As essential services, the power transmission and distribution businesses are natural monopolies; these segments are regulated as such by the electricity law, which requires free access to networks and regulates rates.

Under the Chilean Electricity Law, companies engaged in generation and transmission on an interconnected electrical grid must coordinate their operations through a centralizing operating agent, theCentro de Despacho Económico de Carga (CDEC), in order to operate the system at minimum cost while maintaining reliable service. For this reason, the CDEC plans and operates the system, including the calculation of the so-called “marginal cost,” which is the price assigned to CDEC-organized energy transfers occurring among power generating companies.

Therefore, a company’s decision to generate electricity is subject to the CDEC’s operation plan. On the other hand, each company is free to decide whether to sell its energy to regulated or unregulated customers. Any surplus or deficit between a company’s sales to its customers and its energy supply is sold to, or purchased from, other generators at the spot market price.

A power generating company may have the following types of customers:

(i) Distribution companies that supply power to regulated customers: This distribution is to residential and commercial consumers and small and medium-size businesses with a connected capacity equal to or less than 500 kW located in the concession area of a distribution company. Customers that consume from 500 kW to 2000 kW may choose to be regulated or unregulated clients. Until 2009, the transfer prices between generators and distribution companies for supplying power to regulated customers were capped at a maximum value called the node price, which is regulated by the Ministry of Energy. Node prices are set every six months, in April and October, based on a report prepared by the

F-46

CNE that takes into account projections of expected marginal costs in the system over the next 48 months for the SIC and 24 months for the SING. Beginning in 2010, and as the node price contracts begin to expire, the transfer prices between generators and distributors is being replaced by the results of regulated bidding processes, with a price cap set by the authority every six months.

(ii) Unregulated customers: Those customers, mainly industrial and mining companies, with a connected capacity of over 2,000 kW. These consumers can freely negotiate prices for electrical supply with generators and/or distributors. Customers with capacity between 500 and 2,000 kW, as indicated in the preceding paragraph, have the option to contract energy at prices agreed upon with their suppliers or be subject to regulated prices, with a minimum stay of at least four years under each pricing system.

(iii) Spot market: This represents energy and capacity transactions among generating companies that result from the CDEC’s coordination to keep the system running as economically as possible, where the surpluses (deficits) between a generator’s energy supply and the energy it needs to comply with business commitments are transferred through sales (purchases) to (from) other generators in the CDEC. In the case of energy, transfers are valued at the marginal cost, while node prices for capacity are set every semester by the regulators.

In Chile, the capacity that must be paid to each generator depends on an annual calculation performed by the CDEC to determine the firm capacity of each power plant, which is not the same as the dispatched capacity.

Beginning in 2010 with the enactment of Law 20,018, distribution companies must have enough supply permanently available to cover their entire demand projected for a period of three years; to do so, they must carry out long-term public bidding processes.

Regarding renewable energy, in April of 2008 Law 20,257 was enacted, which encourages the use of Non-Conventional Renewable Energies (NCRE). The principal aspect of this law is that at least 5% of generation companies’ energy sold to its customers must come from renewable sources between years 2010 and 2014. This requirement progressively increases by 0.5% from year 2015 until 2024, when a 10% renewable energy requirement will be reached. This law was recently amended by Law 20,698, published in the Official Gazette (Diario Oficial) on October 22, 2013 and dubbed the “20/25 law,” as it establishes that by 2025, 20% of power supplied will be generated by NCRE. It does not change plan from the previous law for supplying power under agreements in effect in July 2013.

On December 31, 2012, the Regulations containing the provisions governing complementary services were published in the Official Gazette. These services are understood to be the technical resources in generation, transmission and distribution, and customer facilities that are not subject to price regulations and that each electrical system must have for the coordination of its operations as stipulated in Article 137 of the General Law on Electrical Services.

On August 7, 2013, the Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels (SEF), in ORD No. 7230, invoking its powers of interpretation and supervision, decreed that distribution companies’ consumption in excess of the supply they have contracted with generating companies that have agreed to supply their power through tenders, must be covered with the surplus power that other distributors have contracted through tenders with other generating companies. For this purpose, distribution companies with surpluses may transfer their excess power to distribution companies with deficits with no need to obtain the consent of the respective generator.

Law 20,701, the Electricity Concession Law, whose purpose is to streamline the process for obtaining power concessions, was published in the Official Gazette on October 14, 2013. This new law simplifies the process for obtaining temporary concessions, shortens processing times, identifies possible observations and opposition to projects, modifies the notification process, establishes summary judicial proceedings, makes it possible to divide concession applications, modifies the procedure for real estate appraisals, and resolves conflicts between different types of concessions.

On January 8, 2014, the Senate, unanimously on its third vote, passed the bill amending the General Electricity Services Law in order to permit interconnection of the central grid (the SIC) with the northern grid (the SING).

F-47

Brazil, Colombia, and Peru

Legislation in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru allows participation of private capital in the electricity sector, upholds free competition between companies in electricity generation, and defines criteria to avoid certain levels of economic concentration and/or market practices that may cause a decline in free competition.

In regards to the main characteristics of the electricity generation business, it can be said that in general, these are open markets in which private players are free to make their own investment decisions, within government guidelines. The exception is Brazil, a country which, based on the contractual needs of the distribution companies, the Ministry of Energy actively participates in the expansion of the electricity system by, on the one hand, establishing capacity quotas by type of technology and, on the other, promoting separate bids for thermal, hydraulic, or renewable energies or participating directly by organizing public bids for specific projects. In addition, operations in these countries are centrally coordinated, with an independent operator coordinating load dispatch. Except for Colombia, where dispatch is based on prices offered by the players, in the other countries load dispatched is centralized, based on variable production costs in order to ensure the fulfillment of the demand at a minimum cost for the system. From that dispatch, the marginal cost, which defines the price for spot transactions, is determined. In Brazil, the price at which spot market transactions are settled is called the Difference Settlement Price (PLD, its Portuguese acronym), which takes into account the risk aversion curve of the players. As for Peru, its spot price fixing system does do not necessarily reflect system costs since it defines an idealized marginal cost which does not take into account the current restrictions of the gas and electricity transport system, and at the same time defines a ceiling price for the market. This was established in an emergency regulation in 2008 (Emergency Decree 049 of 2008) and is expected to remain in effect until 2015.

In Colombia, Brazil, and Peru, generation players are able to sell energy through contracts in the regulated or unregulated markets, and to trade their surplus/deficit on the spot market. The unregulated market is focused on the segment of large users, although the limits that define this status vary in each market: Brazil: 3,000 kW or 500 kW for renewable fuels; Colombia: 100 kW or 55 MWh per month; and Peru: at least 200 kW.

The principal differences among the markets involve how energy sales are regulated among generators and distributors and how regulated prices are established for the determination of the tariffs charged to end users.

•        In Brazil, there are two markets for contracting energy. In the unregulated market, suppliers and their clients directly negotiate energy purchase conditions. In the regulated market, where distribution companies operate, energy purchases must go through a tender process coordinated by ANEEL, the National Electricity Agency. In this way, the regulated purchase price used in the determination of tariffs to end users is based on average prices of open bids, and there are separate bidding processes for existing and new energy. Bidding processes for new energy contemplate long-term generation contracts in which new generation projects must cover the growth of demand foreseen by distributors. The open bids for existing energy consider shorter contractual terms and seek to cover the distributors’ contractual needs arising from the expiry of prior contracts. Each bidding process is coordinated centrally. Authorities set maximum prices and, as a result, contracts are signed where all distributors participating in the process buy pro rata from each offering generator.

In order to reduce the final price of electricity tariffs and to re-launch economic activity in Brazil, on September 11, 2012, the government approved Temporary Measure (Medida Provisoria) 579, which establishes the conditions for renewing the electricity industry’s concessions that expire between 2015 and 2017 and reduces the tax burden on electricity tariffs, which will now be covered with government funds. Law 12,783 converting the Temporary Measure and Development Decree 7891 was published in January of 2013. In compliance with the Law and the Decree, on January 25, 2013 the ANEEL approved an extraordinary tariff revision that reduced electricity rates by an average of 20% for regulated clients, due in part to lower energy costs as a result of renewed generation and transmission concessions and in part to a reduction in tariff charges.

•        In Colombia, distributors are free to decide their supply, being able to define the conditions of public bidding processes where they acquire energy for the regulated market, and they are able to buy energy on the spot market. Prices paid by end users reflect an average of the purchase price. Since 2004, the CREG (the Colombian Energy and Gas Regulation Commission) has working on a proposal called the Regulated Organized Market or MOR, its acronym in Spanish, to modify the energy contracting system in the Colombian market. Under the proposal, the existing contracting system will be modified into an electronic contract system. This mechanism will replace the current bidding processes by energy auctions with standardized commercial conditions, where contractual demand will be treated as a single aggregate demand.

F-48

•        In Peru, as in Chile, distributors are obligated to enter into contracts for their energy supply, and the legislation was amended so that public bids would be based on distributor requirements. Currently, there are only a few contracts between generators and distributors that are in force at “bar price” (the equivalent of the node price in Chile), which is set on the basis of centralized calculations. However, since 2007 contracts are based on public bids. Authorities approve the terms and conditions for the bidding and set the maximum price for each bid.

All of these countries have some regulations in force promoting the use of renewable energy. However, unlike Chile, they have not established a mandatory quota for incorporating this type of technology. In Brazil, the ANEEL holds auctions by technology type, taking into consideration the expansion plan set by the planning agency in order to reach the goal set for the level of alternative renewable energy capacity. Peru has a 5% maximum goal for the use of NCRE in the country’s energy system, and the regulatory authority, the Energy and Mining Investment Supervisory Agency (OSINERGIM), holds discriminatory auctions to meet this goal. Colombia currently has an indicative goal of 3.5% for the National Energy System in 2015 and 6.5% in 2020, but the plan is currently under review.

Argentina

Argentina has shown signs of intervention in the electricity market since the crisis of 2002. Under the previous regulations, generators sold to distributors at prices obtained from centralized calculations of the average spot market price. The distributers’ purchase price was the average price forecast for the next six months, called the Seasonal Price (Precio Estacional). Any differences between the Seasonal Price (the purchase price) and the actual spot price (the selling price) was charged to the Seasonal Fund (Fondo Estacional) managed by the Electricity Wholesale Market Administration Company (CAMMESA).

However, after the 2002 crisis, the authorities changed the price-setting criteria, bringing the marginal pricing system to an end. First, marginal prices were set as if there were no restrictions on natural gas. In effect, despite the fact that generation is dispatched on the basis of the fuels actually used, Resolution SE 240/2003 establishes that the marginal price is to be calculated taking into consideration all of the generation units as if there were no restrictions in effect on natural gas supplies. In addition, the expense of water is not included in the calculations if its opportunity cost is higher than the cost of generating power with natural gas. Second, it established a spot price ceiling of Ar$120/MWh. However, CAMMESA pays the actual variable costs of the liquid fuel-fired thermal plants through the Temporary Dispatch Cost Overruns program.

In addition, as the dollarized economy was devalued and went back to the peso, payment for capacity fell from US$10 to Ar$10 per MWh. Capacity payments have subsequently risen slightly, to 12 pesos.

Additionally the freezing of prices paid by distributors caused a gap between actual generation costs and the payments made based on demand through the distributors. This resulted in various types of special agreements aimed at recovering costs, in accordance with regulations in force.

It was in this context that the government announced in 2012 its plan to modify the current regulatory framework and to develop in 2013 and 2014 a payment system based on an average cost scheme.

Resolution 95/13 was published in the Official Bulletin (Boletín Oficial) on March 26, 2013, significantly changing the system for generators’ remunerations and other aspects of how the Wholesale Electricity Market, or MEM, operates. This new system applies to previous generation, provided that past and future claims against Resolution SE 406/03 and the Generation Agreement of 2008-2011 are withdrawn.

On May 30 and 31, 2013, the Group’s generating companies (Endesa Costanera and Hidroeléctrica El Chocón) accepted the terms of Resolution SE 95/2013.

F-49

This resolution marked the end of marginal pricing as a payment system in the Argentine power generation market and established, instead, payment by type of technology and size of plant. For each case, it recognizes fixed costs (determined on the basis of fulfillment of availability) and variable costs, plus an additional remuneration (the two parts are determined on the basis of the energy generated). Part of the additional remuneration will be placed in a trust for future investments.

In principle, commercial management and fuel dispatch will be in the hands of CAMMESA; Terminal Market agreements cannot be extended or renewed, and large users, once their respective contracts are up, must purchase their supply from CAMMESA. However, the Secretary of Energy, in Note SE 1807/13, gives generators the opportunity to express their intention to continue handling collections for their entire contract portfolio, thus ensuring a certain amount of cash flow and a continuing relationship with the customer.

It is also important to mention that Endesa Costanera has availability contracts signed in 2012 that are still in effect, as well as combined cycle contracts (until 2015) and steam generation contracts (until 2019) that will enable the company to implement plan for investing in the Costanera plant generation units in order to optimize the reliability and availability of that plant. The contracts also include payment of the commitments under the Long-Term Service Agreement (LTSA) for the plant’s combined cycles.

Limits on integration and concentration

In general, all of the countries have legislation in effect that defends free competition and, together with specific regulations that apply to the electricity market, defines criteria to avoid certain levels of economic concentration and/or abusive market practices.

In principle, the regulators allow the participation of companies in different activities (e.g. generation, distribution, and commercialization) as long as there is an adequate separation of each activity, for both accounting and company purposes. Nevertheless, most of the restrictions imposed involve the transmission sector mainly due to its nature and to the need to guarantee adequate access to all agents. In Argentina and Colombia there are specific restrictions if generation or distribution companies want to become majority shareholders in transmission companies.

Regarding concentration in a specific sector, in Argentina, there are no specific limits that affect the vertical or horizontal integration of a company. In Chile, while there are regulations on free competition, there are no specific quantitative limits on vertical or horizontal integration. However, the General Law on Electrical Services provides that companies that operate on or have ownership in the Trunk Transmission Systems cannot engage in, either directly or indirectly, activities that are in any way involved in the business of power generation or distribution. In Peru, integrations are subject to authorization if such integration is 5% vertical and 15% horizontal. In Colombia, no company may have a direct or indirect market share of over 25% in electricity sale activities. In addition, Colombian companies created after 1994 can only engage in activities that complement generation/sales and distribution/sales. Finally, in Brazil, with the changes taking place in the power industry under Law 10,848/2004 and Decree 5,163/2004, the ANEEL gradually perfected regulations, eliminating concentration limits as no longer compatible with the prevailing regulatory environment.

With regard to consolidations and mergers between agents of the same segment, current regulation requires authorization from the local regulator.

5.2 Distribution:

General Aspects

In the five countries where the Group operates, selling prices charged to clients are based on the purchase price paid to generators plus a component associated with the value added in distribution. Regulators set this value periodically through reviews of distribution tariffs. As a result, distribution is essentially a regulated activity.

F-50

Chile

In Chile, the Distribution Value Added (VAD) is established every four years. For this, the local regulator, (the CNE) classifies companies by typical areas that group together companies with similar distribution costs. A distribution company’s return on investment depends on the company’s performance compared to model company standards defined by the regulator. In 2012 the study process was initiated for calculating the components of the Distribution Value Added for the 2012-2016 tariff period. On September 3, 2012 Chilectra handed the study in to the CNE; its results count for 1/3 of the value of the new tariffs, and the remaining 2/3 corresponds to the contribution made by the study carried out by the CNE.

On September 28, 2012, the CNE assigned the corresponding weighting to the two studies and published the preliminary basic tariffs, with which a check was made that the aggregate return on investment for the industry was within the range of 10% established by law with a dispersion of ± 4%. On April 2, 2013, the Energy Ministry’s Tariff Decree No. 1T was published in the Official Gazette; it has been in effect retroactively from November 4, 2012 and will remain in force until November 3, 2016. The next tariff-setting process will take place in 2016, and the new tariffs will be in effect from 2016 to 2020.

The Rest of Latin America

Similarly, in Peru, the VAD is calculated every 4 years, also using a model company method based on a typical area. The tariffs for the 2009-2013 period were published in October 2009. The process for setting the VAD tariffs and fixed charges was carried out in 2013. On October 16, 2013, the Supervisory Agency for Investment in Energy and Mining (OSINERGMIN) published Resolution 203/2013 setting Edelnor’s distribution tariffs for November 2013 to October 2017. The resolution increases Edelnor’s Distribution Value Added (VAD) by 1.2%.

In Brazil, there are three types of tariff adjustments: i) Ordinary Tariff Reviews (RTO) which are conducted periodically in accordance with the provisions in the concession contracts (in Coelce every 4 years and in Ampla every 5 years); (ii) Annual Adjustments (IRT) since Brazil, unlike other countries, does not automatically index its tariffs to inflation; and (iii) Extraordinary Reviews (RTE) when important events have occurred that may affect the financial situation of the distributors.

The third round of periodic distribution tariff reviews is currently in effect. The periodic tariff review for Coelce was carried out in 2012 for the years 2011 to 2015; it was applied from April 22, 2012, calculated retroactively to April 2011. Ampla is in the periodic review process for 2014 to 2019 tariffs, which should be completed by March 15, 2014.

In September 2012, the government approved Temporary Measure 579, one purpose of which was to reduce certain electricity tariff taxes and special charges paid by the final user, which will be paid in the future with the state budget. In January 2013, the Temporary Measure became Law 12,783, giving rise to Extraordinary Tariff Reviews that resulted in tariffs dropping an average of 18% throughout the country. This reduction affected Ampla and Coelce from the end of January to April 2013, when the respective annual readjustments went into effect.

The latest yearly adjustments for Ampla and Coelce were carried out by ANEEL in April 2013.

In Colombia, theComisión de Regulación de Energía y Gas–the CREG–established in 2008 the present methodology for calculating the rate of return applicable to compensation for distribution, set a new value for that rate, and issued a new methodology for establishing the charges for regional transmission and local distribution systems use. In October 2009, the CREG published the distribution charges for Codensa, which will be in effect for at least five years, until the Commission approves new charges. In 2012, the CREG established annual low-voltage loss indexes that will be recognized in Codensa’s tariffs over the next five years.

In May of 2013, the CREG issued, for consultation with industry players, the bases of the methodology to be used to determine remuneration for distribution over the next regulatory period. In general terms, the methodology proposes the definition of competitive rates, efficient costs, improvements in service quality and reliability, and sustainable companies. Among the aspects to be reviewed by the CREG are how the variables were applied to calculate the WACC, the inventories and costs of the Constructive Units, and the current quality system. The final methodology is expected to be published in the last quarter of 2014.

F-51

In Argentina, the first review of Edesur’s tariffs scheduled for 2001 was cancelled by the authorities due to the country’s economic and financial crisis, and tariffs were frozen starting with that year. Edesur’s tariff restructuring started in 2007 with the enforcement of the “Acta Acuerdo,” or Agreement Act. The last tariff adjustment made to date went into effect in 2008 (with a positive effect on the added value distribution, or VAD), when rates were adjusted for inflation (applying the cost monitoring mechanism, or MMC, provided for in the Agreement Act).

In November 2012, the ENRE passed Resolution 347 authorizing a fixed charge on invoices which differs for various categories of customers. This charge will finance infrastructure works and corrective maintenance through a trust, and will increase distribution revenues invoiced since November 2012. Additionally, in July 2012, the ENRE appointed an observer in Edesur; the appointment is still in effect, although this does not imply loss of control of the company.

In May 2013, the Office of the Secretary of Energy, under the Ministry of Federal Planning, Public Investment and Services, published Resolution SE No. 250/13 authorizing compensation for Edesur’s debt corresponding to revenues originating from the application of the Program for the Rational Use of Electricity until February 2013, with a credit in its favor from recognition of the MMC for the six-month periods between May 2007 and February 2013. In addition, the Resolution instructed CAMMESA to issue in Edesur’s favor what are termed as Sales Settlements with Unspecified Due Dates for values exceeding the compensation mentioned above, and authorized CAMMESA to receive these settlements as partial payment of Edesur’s debt.

Resolution SE 250/13, complemented and extended to September 2013 under Note SE 6852/2013, had a positive effect on that distributing company’s financial results. However, the Comprehensive Tariff Review (RTI) to adjust Edesur’s revenues to its costs and obligations, as provided for in the Renegotiation Agreement Act, is still pending at this time.

- Market for unregulated customers

In all of the countries where the Group operates, distributing companies can supply their customers under regulated or freely-agreed conditions. The supply limitations imposed on the unregulated market are as follows:

Country	kW threshold
Argentina	> 30 kW
Brazil	> 3,000 kW or > 500 kW (*)
Chile	> 500 kW (**)
Colombia	> 100 kW or 55 MWh-month
Peru	> 200 kW (***)

(*): In Brazil, the >500 kW limit applies if energy is purchased from renewable sources, for which the government provides incentives through a discount on tolls.

(**): In Chile, clients purchasing 500 to 2,000 kW may choose between the regulated or unregulated markets. Clients using over 2,000 kW are required to be unregulated customers.

(***) In April 2009 in Peru, it was established that clients between 200 and 2,500 kW could choose between the regulated and unregulated markets. Those using over 2,500 kW are required to be unregulated customers.

- Limits on integration and concentration

In general, current legislation defends free competition and defines criteria to avoid certain levels of economic concentration and/or market practices that would lead to a deterioration of the market.

In principle, the regulators allow the participation of companies in different activities (e.g. generation, distribution, and commercialization) as long as there is an adequate separation of each activity, for both accounting and company purposes. Nevertheless, most of the restrictions imposed involve the transport sector mainly because of its nature and the need to guarantee adequate access to all agents. In Argentina, Chile, Peru, and Colombia there is a variety of specific restrictions that must be met if generation or distribution companies want to become majority shareholders in transportation companies.

F-52

Regarding concentration in a specific sector, while there are no specific limits that affect the vertical or horizontal integration of a company in Argentina, changes in a company’s shares must be authorized by the ENRE. Chile has regulations ensuring free competition, but there are no specific quantitative limits on vertical or horizontal integration. However, the General Law on Electrical Services provides that companies that operate on or have ownership in the Trunk Transmission Systems cannot engage in, either directly or indirectly, activities that are in any way involved in the business of power generation or distribution. In Peru, integrations are subject to authorization if such integration is 5% vertical and 15% horizontal. In Colombia, no company may have a direct or indirect market share of over 25% in electricity sale or generation activities. In addition, Colombian companies created after 1994 can only engage in activities that complement generation/sales and distribution/sales. Finally, in Brazil, with the changes taking place in the power industry under Law 10,848/2004 and Decree 5,163/2004, the ANEEL gradually perfected regulations, eliminating concentration limits as no longer compatible with the prevailing regulatory environment, but leaving vertical separation of activities in place (a distributing company can only provide distribution services).

With regard to consolidations and mergers between agents of the same segment, current regulation requires authorization from the local regulator.

- Access to the grid and subtransmission systems

In all the countries where the Group operates, the right of access and toll or access price is regulated by the local authority.

In Peru, the toll-setting process was concluded in 2013 that recognizes investments in Secondary and Complementary Transmission Systems for the period May 2013 – April 2017.

In Chile, during 2010, local authorities carried out the tariff process for determining the Annual Value of the Subtransmission Systems for the period 2011 through 2014. The CNE published the final technical report on May 13, 2011. Chilectra presented its discrepancies to the Panel of Experts in June of 2011, and the Panel of Experts issued its ruling on August 8. The CNE incorporated this ruling and drew up a new final technical report. On April 9, 2013, Energy Ministry Decree No. 14 setting subtransmission tariffs was published in the Official Gazette. This decree is in effect retroactively from January 1, 2011 until December 31, 2014. The CDEC is currently performing calculations for the reassessment.

F-53

6. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

a) The detail of cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012, is as follows:

	Balance at
Cash and Cash Equivalents	12-31-2013		12-31-2012		01-01-2012
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Cash balances		634,742		16,711,222		1,011,166
Bank balances		237,282,963		329,458,672		265,665,749
Time deposits		1,057,505,464		337,995,782		380,497,446
Other fixed-income instruments		310,964,400		131,666,385		540,509,848
Total		1,606,387,569		815,832,061		1,187,684,209

Time deposits have a maturity of three months or less from their date of acquisition and accrue the market interest for this type of investments. Other fixed-income investments are mainly comprised of resale agreements maturing in 90 days or less from the date of investment.

b) The detail of cash and cash equivalents by currency is as follows:

Currency	12-31-2013		12-31-2012		01-01-2012
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Chilean peso		673,499,514		214,392,882		533,573,465
Argentine peso		22,648,396		13,138,835		27,058,157
Colombian peso		344,234,511		319,900,498		267,476,853
Brazilian real		249,642,972		195,713,685		278,155,164
Peruvian nuevo sol		68,050,020		58,875,208		38,902,348
U.S. dollar		248,312,156		13,810,953		42,518,222
Total		1,606,387,569		815,832,061		1,187,684,209

c) The following table shows the amounts received from the disposal of subsidiaries:

Disposal of Subsidiaries	12-31-2013		12-31-2012		01-01-2012
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Inflow received for disposals in cash and cash equivalents		-		-		31,486,668
Inflow in cash and cash equivalents in entities disposed of		-		-		(18,824,434)
Assets and liabilities in cash and cash equivalents in entities disposed of		-		-		(21,311,336)
Total consideration received for disposals (*)		-		-		(8,649,102)

(*) See Note 2.4.1.

F-54

7. OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS

The detail of other financial assets as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 is as follows:

Other Financial Assets	Balance at
	Current						Non-current
	12-31-2013		12-31-2012		01-01-2012		12-31-2013		12-31-2012		01-01-2012
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Available-for-sale financial investments - unquoted equity securities or with limited liquidity		-		-		-		4,129,036		4,147,129		3,998,401
Available-for-sale financial investments - quoted equity securities		-		-		-		29,195		31,468		86,852
Available-for-sale financial investments IFRC 12 (*) (**)		-		-		-		448,107,319		375,227,434		-
Financial assets held to maturity (*)		588,490,652		-		-		34,867,362		27,045,746		20,793,960
Hedging derivatives (*)		25,142,725		51,876		748,078		4,403,506		32,384,466		12,178,355
Financial assets at fair value with change in profit or loss (*)		163,288,698		194,196,327		-		-		-
Non-hedging derivatives (*)		4,107,362		-		47,504		-		-		-
Other assets		-		252,595		143,638		-		181,863		189,202
Total		781,029,437		194,500,798		939,220		491,536,418		439,018,106		37,246,770

(*) See Note 21.1.a.

The amounts included in financial assets held to maturity and financial assets at fair value with change in profit or loss, correspond mainly to time deposits, and other highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash and are subject to a low risk of changes in value, but do not fulfill the definition of cash equivalent as defined in Note 3.g.2 (eg, with maturity over 90 days from time of investment).

(**) On September 11, 2012, the Brazilian government issued Temporary Law 579, which became permanent on January 13, 2013 and directly affects companies holding electric power generation, transmission, and distribution concessions, including Ampla and Coelce. Among its provisions, this legislation establishes that the government, as concession grantor, will use theValor Nuevo de Reemplazo (VNR, New Replacement Value) to make the corresponding indemnity payments to the concessionaires for those assets that have not been amortized at the end of the concession period.

As a result of this new development, the subsidiaries have changed how they value and classify the amounts they expect to recover in compensation when the concession period ends. The previous approach was based on the historic cost of the investments, and the rights to compensation were recorded as an account receivable. Now, however, they are valued on the basis of the VNR, and the compensation rights are classified as financial assets available for sale (see Notes 3.g, 7, and 8). Therefore, at the end of the last fiscal year, a new estimate was made of the amounts Ampla and Coelce expect to receive at the end of the concession period, and ThCh$112,274,835 was entered as an increase to assets and financial income.

F-55

8. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

a) The detail of trade and other receivables as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 is as follows:

Trade and Other Receivables, Gross					Balance at
	12-31-2013				12-31-2012				01-01-2012
	Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$		Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$		Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$
Trade and other receivables, gross		1,202,132,149		223,045,673		1,004,632,881		202,900,342		1,133,430,884		444,128,002
Trade receivables, gross		1,002,252,700		181,381,483		883,120,935		163,265,685		1,046,072,687		182,387,693
Other receivables, gross		199,879,449		41,664,190		121,511,946		39,634,657		87,358,197		261,740,309
Trade and Other Receivables, Net					Balance at
	12-31-2013				12-31-2012				01-01-2012
	Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$		Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$		Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$
Trade and other receivables, net		1,045,263,881		223,045,673		846,791,111		202,900,342		950,007,713		443,128,492
Trade receivables, net		855,106,689		181,381,483		737,079,414		163,265,685		863,975,605		181,388,183
Other receivables, net (1)		190,157,192		41,664,190		109,711,697		39,634,657		86,032,108		261,740,309

(1) Includes mainly accounts receivable from personnel for ThCh$34,740,084 (ThCh$29,607,762 and ThCh$20,411,550 as of December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively); accounts receivable from losses due to the earthquake and other indemnities to be received for ThCh$0 (ThCh$74,873,533 and ThCh$24,261,059 as of December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively); Resolution 250/13 (applicable in Argentina), Cost Monitoring Mechanism (MMC) adjustment for ThCh$138,901,549 in 2013. Accounts receivable from the application of IFRIC 12, “Service Concession Agreements,” which as of December 2011 amounted to ThCh$212,947,609, were classified as available-for-sale financial investments at December 2012 (see Note 7).

There are no significant trade and other receivables balances held by the Group that are not available for its use.

The Group does not have clients to which it has sales representing 10% or more of its operating income in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Refer to Note 9.1 for detailed information on amounts, terms, and conditions associated with accounts receivable from related companies.

b) As of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012, the balance of unimpaired past due trade receivables is as follows:

Trade Receivables Past Due but Not Impaired			Balance at
	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$
Less than three months		103,911,764		129,206,102		81,387,613
Between three and six months		30,627,469		11,822,289		38,450,793
Between six and twelve months		20,351,006		22,832,886		30,144,689
More than twelve months		182,618,075		123,065,090		114,487,265
Total		337,508,314		286,926,367		264,470,360

F-56

c) The reconciliation of changes in the allowance for impairment of trade receivables is as follows:

Trade Receivables Past Due and Impaired	Current and Non-current ThCh$
Balance at January 1, 2012		184,422,681
Increases (decreases) for the year (*)		32,680,894
Amounts written off		(28,256,530)
Foreign currency translation differences		(31,005,275)
Balance at December 31, 2012		157,841,770
Increases (decreases) for the year (*)		33,554,637
Amounts written off		(18,827,998)
Foreign currency translation differences		(15,700,141)
Balance at December 31, 2013		156,868,268
(*)See Note 29 for Impairment of financial assets.

Write-offs for bad debt

Past-due debt is written off once all collection measures and legal proceedings have been exhausted and the debtors’ insolvency has been demonstrated. In our power generation business, this process normally takes at least one year of procedures for the few cases that arise in each country. In our distribution business, considering the differences in each country, the process takes at least six months in Argentina and Brazil, 12 months in Colombia and Peru, and 24 months in Chile. Overall, the risk of bad debt, and therefore the risk of writing off our customers, is limited (see Notes 3.e and 20.5).

d) Additional information:

- Additional statistical information required under Official Bulletin 715 of the SVS, Chile, of February 3, 2012, XBRL Taxonomy: see Appendix 6.

- Complementary information on Trade Receivables, see Appendix 6.1.

F-57

9. BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES

Related party transactions are performed at current market conditions.

Transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries and joint ventures have been eliminated on consolidation and are not itemized in this note.

As of the date of these financial statements, no guarantees have been given or received nor has any allowance for bad or doubtful accounts been recorded with respect to receivable balances for related party transactions.

The controlling shareholder of Enersis is Endesa S.A., a Spanish corporation which, in turn, is controlled by the Italian corporation Enel S.p.A.

9.1  Balances and Transactions with Related Companies

The balances of accounts receivable and payable between the Company and its non-consolidated related companies are as follows:

a) Receivables from related companies

											Balance at
							Current						Non-current
Taxpayer ID No. (RUT)	Company	Country	Relationship	Currency	Description of Transaction	Term of Transaction	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$
Foreign	E E Piura (1)	Peru	Common Immediate Parent	Sol	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		34,666		208,118		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Energía S.A.	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		51,722		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Energía S.A.	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	CP	Other services	Less than 90 days		16,773		43,591		30,857		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Latinoamérica S.A	Spain	Related to Immediate Parent	US$	Reimbursement for expenses	Less than 90 days		26,165		26,165		26,165		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Latinoamérica S.A	Spain	Related to Immediate Parent	Real	Dividends	Less than 90 days		82,273		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa España	Spain	Related to Immediate Parent	US$	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		7,407		4,230		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa España	Spain	Related to Immediate Parent	CH$	Other services	More than 90 days		4,229		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa España	Spain	Related to Immediate Parent	Ar$	Other services	More than 90 days		9,056		-		-		-		-		-
96,524,140-K	Empresa Electrica Panguipulli S.A.	Chile	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Energy sales	Less than 90 days		66,697		22,457		107		-		-		-
96,880,800-1	Empresa Electrica Puyehue S.A.	Chile	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Energy sales	Less than 90 days		11,949		95,399		7		-		-		-
Foreign	Generalima S.A. (1)	Peru	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		23,890		311,013		-		-		-
Foreign	Generalima S.A. (1)	Peru	Common Immediate Parent	Sol	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		-		578		-		-		-
Foreign	EOSC	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	CP	Other services	Less than 90 days		104,391		71,721		-		-		-		-
Foreign	SACME	Argentina	Associate	Ar$	Other services	Less than 90 days		600,854		764,937		630,091		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Cemsa S.A. (1)	Argentina	Associate	Ar$	Energy sales	Less than 90 days		-		3,284,701		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Cemsa S.A. (1)	Argentina	Associate	Ar$	Tolls	Less than 90 days		-		20,286,684		23,839,664		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Cemsa S.A. (1)	Argentina	Associate	Ar$	Other	Less than 90 days		-		5,788,317		16,724		-		-		-
Foreign	Enel Energy Europe	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		799,470		-		-		-		-		-
96,806,130-5	Electrogas S.A.	Chile	Associate	CH$	Dividends	Less than 90 days		1,375,492		-		-		-		-		-
76,788,080-4	GNL Quintero S.A.	Chile	Associate	CH$	Energy sales	Less than 90 days		366,882		771,985		8,926,072		-		-		-
76,418,940-k	GNL Chile S.A.	Chile	Associate	CH$	Advance natural gas purchases	Less than 90 days		11,382,879		-		-		-		-		-
76,418,940-k	GNL Chile S.A.	Chile	Associate	US$	Other services	Less than 90 days		1,717,013		546,833		591,541		-		-		-
76,418,940-k	GNL Chile S.A.	Chile	Associate	CH$	Loans	Less than 90 days		445,022		379,802		379,862		-		-		-
76,014,570-K	Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	US$	Energy sales	Less than 90 days		-		98,150		98,118		-		-		-
76,014,570-K	Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	US$	Other services	Less than 90 days		544,015		213		-		-		-		-
76,014,570-K	Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	US$	Loans	Less than 90 days		14,839,233		13,336,206		20,201,586		-		-		-
77,017,930-0	Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		181,855		177,501		-		-		-
76,652,400-1	Centrales Hidroeléctricas De Aysén S.A. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		292,518		270,458		-		-		-
Foreign	Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. (2)	Colombia	Joint Venture	CP	Energy sales	Less than 90 days		1,184,715		358,491		5,574,593		-		-		-
Foreign	Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. (2)	Colombia	Joint Venture	CP	Other services	Less than 90 days		87,817		273,938		307,638		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Generación	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Commodity derivatives (*)	Less than 90 days		129,780		784,741		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Enel Ingegneria e Innovazione	Italy	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		25,908		36,340		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Central Dock Sud (1)	Argentina	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		17,256		-		-		-		-
Foreign	PH Chucas Costa Rica	Costa Rica	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		147,239		42,019		317,563		-		-		-
		Total						34,019,574		47,570,282		61,912,486		-		-		-

(*)  See Note 21.3.

(1)    See Note 2.4.1 and 25.1.1.

(2)    See Note 2.2.a).

F-58

b) Accounts payable to related companies

							Current						Non-current
Taxpayer ID No. (RUT)	Company	Country	Relationship	Currency	Description of Transaction	Term of Transaction	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$
Foreign	E E Piura (1)	Peru	Common Immediate Parent	Sol	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		162,847		995,885		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Latinoamérica S.A.	Spain	Related to Immediate Parent	Ar$	Dividends	Less than 90 days		87,398		105,569		130,841		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Latinoamérica S.A.	Spain	Related to Immediate Parent	CH$	Dividends	Less than 90 days		79,654,628		69,349,995		69,240,261		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Latinoamérica S.A.	Spain	Related to Immediate Parent	CP	Dividends	Less than 90 days		-		17,925,206		27,306,717		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Latinoamérica S.A. (3)	Spain	Related to Immediate Parent	US$	Loans	Less than 90 days		-		-		1,207,252		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Latinoamérica S.A. (4)	Spain	Related to Immediate Parent	US$	Loans	More than 90 days		53,724,599		-		-		-		-		-
96,524,140-K	Empresa Electrica Panguipulli S.A.	Chile	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Energy purchases	Less than 90 days		684,882		216,029		182,599		-		-		-
96,880,800-1	Empresa Electrica Puyehue S.A.	Chile	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Energy sales	Less than 90 days		-		-		-		-		-		-
96,880,800-1	Empresa Electrica Puyehue S.A.	Chile	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Energy purchases	Less than 90 days		2,865		15,896		60,659		-		-		-
Foreign	SACME	Argentina	Associate	Ar$	Other services	Less than 90 days		126,059		109,529		152,402		-		-		-
96,806,130-5	Electrogas S.A.	Chile	Associate	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		200,821		54,607		538,373		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Cemsa S.A. (1)	Argentina	Associate	Ar$	Fuel purchases	Less than 90 days		-		7,234,142		19,615,744		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Cemsa S.A. (1)	Argentina	Associate	Real	Energy transportation	Less than 90 days		-		20,595,952		21,546,571		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Cemsa S.A. (1)	Argentina	Associate	Ar$	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		-		3,081		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Cemsa S.A. (1)	Argentina	Associate	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		752		68,039		-		-		-
76,418,940-k	GNL Chile S.A.	Chile	Associate	CH$	Natural gas purchases	Less than 90 days		13,864,085		25,884,955		8,517,317		-		-		-
Foreign	Carboex S.A.	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Coal purchases	Less than 90 days		-		-		5,586,847		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Generación	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Fuel purchases	Less than 90 days		4,947,081		4,556,927		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Generación	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Commodity derivatives (*)	Less than 90 days		-		32,200		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Central Termica Manuel Belgrano	Argentina	Associate	Ar$	Mercantile current account	Less than 90 days		-		-		846		-		-		-
Foreign	Enel Energy Europe	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	CP	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		34,487		124,977		-		-		-
Foreign	Enel Energy Europe	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		240,708		373,944		1,613,683		-		-		-
Foreign	Enel Energy Europe	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Euros	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		-		13,589		-		-		-
Foreign	Enel Energy Europe	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Real	Other services	Less than 90 days		388,848		37,551		44,705		-		-		-
Foreign	Enel Energy Europe	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Sol	Other services	Less than 90 days		185,424		48,086		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Enel Energy Europe	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Ar$	Other services	Less than 90 days		39,108		7,402		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Enel Energy Europe	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	US$	Other services	Less than 90 days		414,435		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Enel Distribuzione	Italy	Ultimate controlling party	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		65,500		-		4,782		-		-		-
Foreign	Enel Produzione	Italy	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		80,928		80,928		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Enel Ingegneria e Innovazione	Italy	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		2,680,995		-		-		-		-		-
76,014,570-K	Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	US$	Natural gas purchases	Less than 90 days		4,846,992		1,629,774		1,866,685		-		-		-
76,014,570-K	Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	US$	Energy purchases	Less than 90 days		-		371,650		-		-		-		-
76,014,570-K	Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	US$	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		90,625		-		-		-		-
77,017,930-0	Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	CH$	Toll	Less than 90 days		-		66,037		-		-		-		-
77,017,930-0	Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		221,663		158,713		202,613		-		-		-
Foreign	Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. (2)	Colombia	Joint Venture	CP	Energy purchases	Less than 90 days		1,093,053		1,114,927		1,111,748		-		-		-
Foreign	Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. (2)	Colombia	Joint Venture	CP	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		370		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Central Dock Sud (1)	Argentina	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		407		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa España	Spain	Related to Immediate Parent	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		98		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa España	Spain	Related to Immediate Parent	CH$	Dividends	Less than 90 days		40,106,179		-		-		-		-		-
76,126,507-5	Parque Eolico Talinay Oriente SA	Chile	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Energy purchases	Less than 90 days		400,585		-		-		-		-		-
0-E	Parque Eolico Cristal	Brazil	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Energy purchases	Less than 90 days		355,336		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Enel Green Power Mexico	Mexico	Common Immediate Parent	CH$	Other services	Less than 90 days		-		-		222,468		-		-		-
		Total						204,412,270		150,259,507		160,358,684		-		-		-

(*) See Note 21.3.

(1)	See Note 2.4.1 and 25.1.1.
(2)	See Note 2.2.a).
(3)	The balance payable to Endesa Latinoamérica S.A. relates to a loan granted to Companhia Interconexao Energética S.A. (“CIEN”) to purchase machinery and equipment necessary to complete the construction of its second transmission line. The loan was denominated in US dollars, bore an annual interest rate of Libor + 2.73% and matured in May 2012 (paid in full).
(4)	The balance payable to Endesa Latinoamérica S.A. relates to financing provided to Central Dock Sud S.A. for the construction of the plant and to refinance liabilities. The loan is denominated in US dollars, bears an annual interest rate of Libor + 2.82% and matures in March 2014.

F-59

c) Significant transactions and effects on income/expenses:

Transactions with related companies that are not consolidated and their effects on profit or loss are as follows:

Taxpayer ID No. (RUT)	Company	Country	Relationship	Description of Transaction	12-31-2013 Total ThCh$		12-31-2012 Total ThCh$		12-31-2011 Total ThCh$
Foreign	E E Piura (1)	Peru	Common Immediate Parent	Other operating income		-		233,512		210,546
Foreign	E E Piura (1)	Peru	Common Immediate Parent	Energy purchases		-		(5,725,765)		(13,352,506)
Foreign	E E Piura (1)	Peru	Common Immediate Parent	Other services rendered		-		47,905		57,534
Foreign	E E Piura (1)	Peru	Common Immediate Parent	Energy sales		-		267,642		97,878
Foreign	Endesa Energía S.A.	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Natural gas sales		21,397,171		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Energía S.A.	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Other operating income		99,654		50,410		48,844
Foreign	Endesa Latinoamérica S.A	Spain	Parent	Interest on financial debt		(1,654,945)		(15,119)		118,904
Foreign	Endesa Latinoamérica S.A	Spain	Parent	Other fixed operating expenses		(314,422)		-		(4,490)
Foreign	Endesa Servicios	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Other services rendered		-		-		23,148
Foreign	Endesa Servicios	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Other fixed operating expenses		-		-		(1,165)
Foreign	Endesa Servicios	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Other operating income		-		-		75,041
Foreign	Endesa Generación	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Fuel consumption		(47,540,061)		(41,522,504)		-
Foreign	Endesa Trading	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Fuel consumption		-		(705,859)		-
Foreign	Generalima S.A. (1)	Peru	Common Immediate Parent	Other services rendered		-		23,890		598,940
76,418,940-k	GNL Chile S.A.	Chile	Associate	Natural gas consumption		(60,095,868)		(168,238,842)		(132,888,115)
76,418,940-k	GNL Chile S.A.	Chile	Associate	Natural gas transportation		(34,796,720)		(34,209,731)		(28,679,684)
76,418,940-k	GNL Chile S.A.	Chile	Associate	Other services rendered		769,402		220,493		39,006
76,418,940-k	GNL Chile S.A.	Chile	Associate	Other financial income		40,124		21,995		-
76,788,080-4	GNL Quintero S.A.	Chile	Associate	Energy sales		2,808,698		638,187		6,824,604
76,788,080-4	GNL Quintero S.A.	Chile	Associate	Other services rendered		835,543		661,296		-
96,976,600-0	Gestión Social S.A. (*)	Chile	Related to Director	Other services rendered		-		49,133		75,693
78,488,290-k	Tironi y Asociados S.A. (*)	Chile	Related to Director	Other services rendered		-		2,475		33,703
Foreign	SACME	Argentina	Associate	Outsourced services		(1,317,402)		(1,166,157)		(945,433)
96,880,800-1	Empresa Eléctrica Puyehue S.A.	Chile	Common Immediate Parent	Energy purchases		(109,699)		(789,477)		(3,813,927)
96,880,800-2	Empresa Eléctrica Puyehue S.A.	Chile	Common Immediate Parent	Energy sales		227,765		133,735		131,038
96,524,140-K	Empresa Eléctrica Panguipulli S.A.	Chile	Common Immediate Parent	Energy purchases		(6,118,816)		(1,988,042)		(2,277,414)
96,524,140-K	Empresa Eléctrica Panguipulli S.A.	Chile	Common Immediate Parent	Energy sales		356,056		99,120		43,114
Foreign	Enel Distribuzione	Italy	Ultimate controlling party	Other fixed operating expenses		-		(97,053)		-
Foreign	Enel Energy Europe	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Other fixed operating expenses		(2,010,628)		(649,266)		-
Foreign	Enel Energy Europe	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Other operating income		-		16,222		1,389,272
96,806,130-5	Electrogas S.A.	Chile	Associate	Natural gas tolls		(2,734,877)		(2,175,039)		(2,914,936)
96,806,130-5	Electrogas S.A.	Chile	Associate	Fuel consumption		(428,555)		(697,653)		-
Foreign	Carboex S.A.	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Fuel consumption		-		(5,042,960)		(39,042,866)
Foreign	Central Termica Manuel Belgrano	Argentina	Associate	Other financial income		-		-		286,516
Foreign	Central Termica San Martin	Argentina	Associate	Other financial income		-		-		211,530
Foreign	Endesa Cemsa S.A. (1)	Argentina	Associate	Energy purchases		-		(3,474,994)		-
Foreign	Endesa Cemsa S.A. (1)	Argentina	Associate	Electricity tolls		-		(6,577)		-
Foreign	Endesa Cemsa S.A. (1)	Argentina	Associate	Other services rendered		-		3,474,747		-
Foreign	Endesa Cemsa S.A. (1)	Argentina	Associate	Other fixed operating expenses		-		(801,990)		-
Foreign	Endesa Operaciones y Servicios	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Other operating income		134,775		77,019		-
Foreign	ENEL Green Power Mexico	Mexico	Common Immediate Parent	Other services rendered		-		-		19,216
Foreign	PH Chucas Costa Rica	Costa Rica	Common Immediate Parent	Other services rendered		236,173		481,177		419,356
Foreign	Endesa Distribución Eléctrica	Spain	Common Immediate Parent	Other fixed operating expenses		-		(6,133)		-
Foreign	Enel Ingegneria e Innovazione	Italy	Common Immediate Parent	Other services rendered		32,569		30,536		-
Foreign	Enel Ingegneria e Innovazione	Italy	Common Immediate Parent	Other fixed operating expenses		(1,196,294)		-		-
Foreign	Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. (2)	Colombia	Joint Venture	Energy sales		9,146,049		8,171,445		8,534,042
Foreign	Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. (2)	Colombia	Joint Venture	Other operating income		186,496		103,029		241,179
Foreign	Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. (2)	Colombia	Joint Venture	Other services rendered		2,624,191		2,566,080		2,524,131
Foreign	Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. (2)	Colombia	Joint Venture	Other financial income		868,710		524,140		280,187
Foreign	Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. (2)	Colombia	Joint Venture	Electricity tolls		(1,367,029)		(842,947)		(653,099)
76,652,400-1	Centrales Hidroeléctricas De Aysén S.A. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	Other financial income		46,444		-		73,518
76,652,400-1	Centrales Hidroeléctricas De Aysén S.A. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	Other services rendered		10,281		-		1,346,719
76,014,570-K	Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	Energy purchases		(9,295,172)		(6,589,964)		-
76,014,570-K	Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	Natural gas transportation		(20,937,075)		(20,131,152)		(19,332,811)
76,014,570-K	Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	Energy sales		95,845		64,914		4,216,934
76,014,570-K	Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	Other financial income		489,864		765,504		2,577,375
76,014,570-K	Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	Other fixed operating expenses		(219,671)		(417,892)		(255,407)
77,017,930-0	Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	Electricity tolls		(1,243,417)		(1,219,958)		(1,292,602)
77,017,930-0	Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	Other financial income		-		-		46,163
77,017,930-0	Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. (2)	Chile	Joint Venture	Other services rendered		-		-		199,133
76,583,350-7	Konecta Chile S.A.	Chile	Associate	Other services rendered		-		-		29,788
76,126,507-5	Parque Eolico Talinay Oriente SA	Chile	Common Immediate Parent	Energy purchases		(1,148,277)		-		-
				Total		(152,123,118)		(277,790,468)		(214,681,403)

(1)    See Note 2.4.1 and 25.1.1.

(2)    See Note 2.2.a).

(*) Company related to our former Director Eugenio Tironi Barrios.

Transfers of short-term funds between related companies are treated as current accounts changes, with variable interest rates based on market conditions used for the monthly balance. The resulting amounts receivable or payable are usually at 30 days term, with automatic rollover for the same periods and amortization in line with cash flows.

F-60

9.2  Board of Directors and Key Management Personnel

Enersis is managed by Board of Directors which consists of seven members. Each director serves for a three-year term after which they can be reelected.

The Board of Directors as of December 31, 2013 was elected at the Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 22, 2010. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and Secretary were designated at the Board meeting held on the same date.

a) Accounts receivable and payable and other transactions

• Accounts receivable and payable

There are no outstanding amounts receivable or payable between the Company and the members of the Board of Directors and key management personnel.

• Other transactions

No other transactions have taken place between the Company and the members of the Board of Directors and key management personnel.

b) Compensation for Directors

In accordance with Article 33 of Law No. 18,046 governing stock corporations, the compensation of Directors is established each year at the Ordinary Shareholders Meeting of Enersis S.A.

The remuneration consists of paying a variable annual compensation equal to one one-thousandth of the profit for the year (attributable to Shareholders of Enersis). Also, each member of the Board will be paid a monthly compensation, one part a fixed monthly fee and another part dependent on meetings attended. The remuneration breaks down as follows:

- 101 UF as a fixed monthly fee, and

- 66 UF as per diem for each Board meeting attended.

The amounts paid for the monthly fee will be treated as payment in advance of the variable annual compensation described above. As stated in the by-laws, the remuneration for the Chairman of the Board will be twice that of a Director, and the compensation of the Vice Chairman will be 50% higher than that of a Director.

Any advance payments received will be deducted from the annual variable compensation, with no reimbursement if the annual variable compensation is lower than the total amount paid in advances. The variable compensation will be paid, when appropriate, after the Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting approves the Annual Report, Balance Sheet and Financial Statements, and the Independent Auditors’ Reports and Account Inspectors’ Reports for the year ending December 31, 2013.

If any Director of Enersis S.A. is a member of more than one Board in any Chilean or foreign subsidiaries and/or associates, or holds the position of director or advisor in other Chilean or foreign companies or legal entities in which Enersis S.A. has a direct or indirect ownership interest, that Director can be compensated for his/her participation in only one of those Boards or Management Committees.

The Executive Officers of Enersis S.A. and/or any of its Chilean or foreign subsidiaries or associates will not receive any compensation or per diem if they hold the position of director in any of the Chilean or foreign subsidiaries or associates of Enersis S.A. Nevertheless, the executives may receive such compensation or per diem, provided there is prior express authorization, as a payment in advance of the variable portion of their remuneration received from the respective companies through which they are employed.

F-61

Directors’ Committee:

Each member of the Directors’ Committee will receive a variable remuneration equal to 0.11765 thousandth of the profit for the year (attributable to shareholders of Enersis). Also each member will be paid a monthly compensation, one part in a fixed monthly fee and another part dependent on meetings attended.

This remuneration is broken down as follows:

- 38.00 UF as a fixed monthly fee, and

- 18.00 UF as per diem for each Board meeting attended.

The amounts paid for the monthly fee will be treated as payment in advance of the variable annual compensation described above.

Any advance payments received will be deducted from the annual variable compensation, with no reimbursement if the annual variable compensation is lower than the total amount paid in advances. The variable compensation will be paid, when appropriate, after the Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting approves the Annual Report, Balance Sheet and Financial Statements, and the Independent Auditors’ Reports and Account Inspectors’ Reports for the year ending December 31, 2013.

The following tables show details of the compensation paid to the members of the Board of Directors as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011:

Taxpayer ID No. (RUT)	Name	Position	12-31-2013
			Period in Position ThCh$	Enersis Board ThCh$		Board of Subsidiaries ThCh$		Directors’ Committee ThCh$
5,710,967-K	Pablo Yrarrázaval Valdés	Chairman	January - December 2013		110,323		-		-
Foreign	Borja Prado Eulate (1)	Vice Chairman	April - December 2013		52,523		-		-
48,070,966-7	Rafael Miranda Robredo	Director	January - December 2013		18,639		-		-
5,719,922-9	Leonidas Vial Echeverría	Director	January - December 2013		50,598		-		15,859
6,429,250-1	Rafael Fernández Morandé	Director	January - December 2013		55,162		-		16,691
4,132,185-7	Hernán Somerville Senn	Director	January - December 2013		53,638		-		16,276
5,715,860-3	Eugenio Tironi Barrios (1)	Director	January - April 2013		20,146		-		-
Foreign	Andrea Brentan (2)	Director	January - December 2013		-		-		-
Foreign	Luigi Ferraris (1) (2)	Director	April - December 2013		-		-		-
	TOTAL				361,029		-		48,826
Taxpayer ID No. (RUT)	Name	Position	12-31-2012
			Period in Position ThCh$	Enersis Board ThCh$		Board of Subsidiaries ThCh$		Directors’ Committee ThCh$
5,710,967-K	Pablo Yrarrázaval Valdés	Chairman	January - December 2012		120,654		-		-
48,070,966-7	Rafael Miranda Robredo	Director	January - December 2012		60,327		-		-
5,719,922-9	Leonidas Vial Echeverría	Director	January - December 2012		60,734		-		18,479
6,429,250-1	Rafael Fernández Morandé	Director	January - December 2012		61,141		-		18,886
4,132,185-7	Hernán Somerville Senn	Director	January - December 2012		61,141		-		18,886
5,715,860-3	Eugenio Tironi Barrios	Director	January - December 2012		60,327		-		-
	TOTAL				424,324		-		56,251
Taxpayer ID No. (RUT)	Name	Position	12-31-2011
			Period in Position	Enersis Board		Board of Subsidiaries		Directors’ Committee
5,710,967-K	Pablo Yrarrázaval Valdés	Chairman	January - December 2011		80,062		-		-
48,070,966-7	Rafael Miranda Robredo	Vice Chairman	January - December 2011		39,256		-		-
5,719,922-9	Leonidas Vial Echeverría	Director	January - December 2011		40,031		-		13,018
6,429,250-1	Rafael Fernández Morandé	Director	January - December 2011		40,031		-		13,410
4,132,185-7	Hernán Somerville Senn	Director	January - December 2011		40,031		-		13,410
5,715,860-3	Eugenio Tironi Barrios	Director	January - December 2011		40,031		-		-
	TOTAL				279,442		-		39,838

(1) Mr. Luigi Ferraris became Director on April 16, 2013, replacing Eugenio Tironi. On the same date, Mr. Borja Prado Eulate became Vice Chairman.

(2) Mr. Andrea Bentran and Mr. Luigi Ferraris waived the fees and allowances due to them as Company Directors.

F-62

c) Guarantees established by the Company in favor of the Directors

No guarantees have been given to the Directors.

9.3  Compensation for Key Management Personnel

a) Compensation received by key management personnel

Key Management Personnel
Taxpayer ID No. (RUT)	Name	Position
22,298,662-1	Ignacio Antoñanzas Alvear	Chief Executive Officer
23,535,550-7	Massimo Tambosco	Deputy Chief Executive Officer
7,984,912-K	Eduardo Escaffi Johnson (1)	Administration, Finance, and Control Officer
Foreign	Marco Fadda (3)	Planning and Control Officer
Foreign	Alain Rosolino (2)	Internal Audit Officer
Foreign	Jaime Sanchez Cano (5)	Global Services Officer
11,470,853-4	Juan Pablo Larraín Medina (4)	Communications Officer
23,014,537-7	Carlos Niño Forero	Human Resources and Organization Officer
7,706,387-0	Eduardo López Miller	Procurement Officer
6,973,465-0	Domingo Valdés Prieto	General Counsel

(1) Mr. Eduardo Escaffi Johnson took over as Financial Officer on September 1, 2012, replacing Mr. Alfredo Ergas S., who resigned on August 27, 2012.

(2) On December 12, 2012, Ms. Alba Marina Urrea G. voluntarily resigned from Enersis; Mr. Alain Rosolino was designated as her replacement on the same date

(3) On April 1, 2013, Mr. Marco Fadda took over as Planning and Control Officer, replacing Mr. Ramiro Alfonsin Balza, who was named Deputy Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. on the same date.

(4) Mr. Juan Pablo Larraín voluntarily resigned from Enersis, leaving the company on September 30, 2013.

(5) Mr. Jaime Sánchez Cano took over as Global Services Officer on August 30, 2013.

Compensation received by key management personnel is the following:

			Balance at
	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
Cash compensation		2,522,068		2,615,660		2,660,608
Short-term benefits for employees		514,139		996,474		846,340
Other long-term benefits		612,627		724,297		151,636
Total		3,648,834		4,336,431		3,658,584

Incentive plans for key management personnel

Enersis has implemented an annual bonus plan for its executives based on meeting company-wide objectives and on the level of their individual contribution in achieving the overall goals of the Group. The plan provides for a range of bonus amounts according to seniority level. The bonuses paid to the executives consist of a certain number of monthly gross remunerations.

b) Guarantees established by the Company in favor of key management personnel

No guarantees have been given to key management personnel.

F-63

9.4  Compensation Plans Linked to Share Price

There are no payment plans granted to the Directors or key management personnel based on the price of Enersis stock.

However, until the 2011 fiscal year, certain key Enersis personnel benefited from one of the Enel remuneration plans that is based on the price of its stock. The cost of this plan is borne by Enel and does not give rise to any payment obligations for Enersis. The main features of this plan are the following:

Restricted share units plan from 2008:

This plan is aimed at Enel Group executives, and its beneficiaries are divided into brackets. The basic number of units granted to each beneficiary was determined on the basis of the average gross annual compensation of the bracket, as well as the price of Enel shares at the start of the period covered by the plan (January 2, 2008). The right to exercise the units is subordinate to the condition that the executives concerned remain employed within the Group, with a few exceptions.

The plan establishes an operational objective, subject to a condition precedent (a “hurdle target”), as follows:

i) For the first 50% of the basic number of units granted, Group EBITDA for 2008-2009, calculated on the basis of the amounts specified in the budgets for those years.

ii) For the remaining 50% of the basic number of units granted, Group EBITDA for 2008-2010, calculated on the basis of the amounts specified in the budgets for those years.

If the hurdle target, as described above, is achieved, the actual number of units that can be exercised by each beneficiary is determined on the basis of a performance objective represented by:

i) For the first 50% of the basic number of units granted, a comparison on a total shareholders’ return basis – for the period from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009 – between the performance of ordinary Enel shares on the Italian stock exchange and that of a specific reference index.

ii) For the remaining 50% of the basic number of units granted, a comparison on a total shareholders’ return basis – for the period from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010 – between the performance of ordinary Enel shares on the Italian stock exchange and that of a specific reference index.

The number of units that can be exercised may vary up or down with respect to the basic unit granted by a percentage amount of between 0% and 120% as determined on the basis of a specific performance scale.

If the hurdle target is not achieved in the first two-year period, the first tranche of 50% of the units granted may be recovered if the same hurdle target is achieved over the longer three-year period indicated above. It is also possible to extend the validity of the performance level registered in the 2008-2010 period to the 2008-2009 period.

Depending on the degree to which both objectives are met, of the total number of units granted, 50% may be exercised from the second year subsequent to the year in which they were granted, and the remaining 50% as from the third year subsequent to the year in which they were granted. The deadline for exercising all the units is the sixth year subsequent to the year in which they were granted.

F-64

The following table summarizes the plan’s evolution:

	Number of Restricted Share Units
Restricted units granted December 31, 2008		2,700
Restricted units expired in 2009		-
Restricted units pending at December 31, 2009		2,700
Restricted units expired in 2010		-
Restricted units exercised in 2010		-
Restricted units pending at December 31, 2010		2,700
Restricted units pending at January 1, 2011 (with a reevaluation of 120%)		3,240
Restricted units exercised in the first half of 2011 (*)		3,240
Restricted units pending at December 31, 2011		-

(*) The fiscal year value of the restricted share units was €13,683 (2011).

Using the accounting criterion described in Note 3.s, Enersis simultaneously recognized a personnel expense and an equity increase for €1,614 (2011). This amount corresponds to the accrued value during the period in which key personnel involved in this plan provided services to Enersis.

F-65

10. INVENTORIES

The detail of inventories as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 is as follows:

Classes of Inventories	Balance at
	12-31-13		12-31-12		1-1-12
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Goods	5,499,819		5,010,620		2,575,623
Supplies for production		34,121,697		41,288,494		35,893,349
Other inventories (*)		38,161,239		30,263,971		31,865,869
Total		77,782,755		76,563,085		70,334,841
Detail of other inventories
(*) Other inventories		38,161,239		30,263,971		31,865,869
Supplies for projects and spare parts		32,217,502		20,962,944		19,933,881
Electrical materials		5,943,737		9,301,027		11,931,988

There are no inventories pledged as security for liabilities.

For the period ended December 31, 2013, the figure for raw materials and consumables recognized as expenses were ThCh$386,116,195 (ThCh$763,791,553 and ThCh$711,534,021 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively). See Note 27.

As of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012, no inventories have been written down.

11. TAX RECEIVABLES AND PAYABLES

The detail of current tax receivables as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 is as follows:

Tax Receivables	Balance at
	12-31-2013		12-31-2012		01-01-2012
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Monthly provisional tax payments		65,483,322		57,875,497		84,423,571
VAT tax credit		77,938,877		74,704,027		35,861,059
Tax credit for absorbed profits		31,697,734		60,335,643		8,067,408
Tax credit for training expenses		302,998		235,498		7,040
Tax credits from dividends received abroad		28,896,906		-		-
Other		5,814,936		12,404,217		10,006,540
Total		210,134,773		205,554,882		138,365,618

The detail of current tax payables as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 is as follows:

Tax Payables	Balance at
	12-31-2013		12-31-2012		01-01-2012
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Income tax		160,787,063		79,678,148		109,264,172
VAT tax charge		27,157,113		22,152,002		44,610,139
Other		67,204,209		67,715,388		78,371,862
Total		255,148,385		169,545,538		232,246,173

F-66

12. NON-CURRENT ASSETS AND DISPOSAL GROUPS HELD FOR SALE

During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Board of Directors of Enersis authorized the sale of the subsidiaries Compañía Americana de Multiservicios (CAM) and Synapsis Soluciones y Servicios IT Ltda. (Synapsis), as they were considered “non-core” businesses. The sale process included at first an internal verification of the market and the hiring of financial advisors to provide assistance in the sale process. Once offers were received, they were submitted to the Board so that it could make the final decision about the sale and its specific conditions.

The potential sale of CAM was considered to be highly probable as of the end of 2009. As for Synapsis, such consideration was taken into account as of September 2010. After those dates, the Company applied IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations (IFRS 5) to account for these transactions.

CAM and Synapsis provide services in the five countries where Enersis operates in Latin America, i.e. Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Peru. CAM is present with its products and services throughout the electric cycle, including provision, materials logistics, construction and startup of electric projects, certification of equipment, and measurement of final consumption. Furthermore, Synapsis is a company that provides information technology services. It specializes in defining strategies companies can use and helping them select software that satisfies their business needs. Synapsis also designs the infrastructure of the services that will be provided and the methodology to be used, as well as other services.

On December 20, 2010, the Board of Directors of Enersis accepted the offers received to purchase its entire interests in CAM and Synapsis. The CAM offer was presented by Graña y Montero S.A.A., a Peruvian company that offered US$20 million, an amount which, after a price adjustment and contractual compensations, was reduced to US$14.2 million. As for Synapsis, Riverwood Capital L.P., a company domiciled in the United States of America, presented a US$52 million offer to purchase Synapsis, which was paid upon the closing of the sales transaction. The sale of CAM was closed on February 24, 2011, and the Synapsis sale was finalized on March 1, 2011.

As described in Note 3 j), non-current assets and disposal groups held for sale have been recorded at the lower of book value or fair value less selling costs. The impact of this treatment was to record an additional impairment on CAM’s net assets as of December 31, 2010 in the amount of ThCh$14,881,960, which accumulates to a total impairment of ThCh$36,797,809 related to CAM as of December 31, 2010 (ThCh$21,915,849 as of December 31, 2009), which was calculated based on the sales price received.

F-67

13. INVESTMENTS ACCOUNTED FOR USING THE EQUITY METHOD

13.1  Investments Accounted for Using the Equity Method

a. The following tables present the changes in shareholders’ equity of the Group’s equity method investments during the 2013 and the 2012 fiscal years:

Taxpayer ID    No. (RUT)	Changes in Investments in Associates	Relationship	Country	Functional Currency	Ownership Interest			Balance at 1/1/2013 ThCh$		Additions		Acquisitions through Business Combinations under Common Control		Share of Profit (Loss) ThCh$		Dividends Declared ThCh$		Foreign Currency Translation ThCh$		Other Comprehensive Income ThCh$		Balance at 12/31/2013 ThCh$		Negative Equity Provision ThCh$		Balance at 12/31/2013
96,806,130-5	Electrogas S.A.	Associate	Chile	U.S. dollar		42.50	%		9,030,441		-		-		4,186,294		(5,080,897)		769,156		777,330		9,682,324		-		9,682,324
76,788,080-4	GNL Quintero S.A.	Associate	Chile	U.S. dollar		20.00	%		-		-		-		4,914,871		(3,088,495)		36,052		7,922,262		9,784,690		(4,987,182)		4,797,508
76,418,940-K	GNL Chile S.A.	Associate	Chile	U.S. dollar		33.33	%		376,835		-		-		137,691		-		45,089		-		559,615		-		559,615
Foreign	Endesa Cemsa S.A. (1)	Associate	Argentina	Argentine peso		45.00	%		2,743,725		-		-		-		-		-		(2,743,725)		-		-		-
Foreign	Yacylec S.A. (1)	Associate	Argentina	Argentine peso		22.22	%		-		-		693,039		4,725		(91,560)		(56,157)		-		550,047				550,047
Foreign	Sacme S.A.	Associate	Argentina	Argentine peso		50.00	%		25,683		-		-		42,232		-		(46,274)		-		21,641		-		21,641
76,652,400-1	Centrales Hidroeléctricas De Aysén S.A. (2)	Joint Venture	Chile	Chilean peso		51.00	%		66,894,760		5,084,698		-		(2,294,594)		-		-		-		69,684,864		-		69,684,864
77,017,930-0	Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. (2)	Joint Venture	Chile	Chilean peso		50.00	%		5,710,960		-		-		362,937		-		-		-		6,073,897		-		6,073,897
76,014,570-K	Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. (2)(3)	Joint Venture	Chile	U.S. dollar		50.00	%		96,207,755		-		-		17,002,146		-		10,418,067		-		123,627,968		-		123,627,968
Foreign	Distribuidora Eléctrica de Cundinamarca S.A. (2)	Joint Venture	Colombia	Colombian peso		49.00	%		33,527,186		-		-		932,917		(1,178,909)		134,191		(332,369)		33,083,016		-		33,083,016
						Total			214,517,345		5,084,698		693,039		25,289,219		(9,439,861)		11,300,124		5,623,498		253,068,062		(4,987,182)		248,080,880
Taxpayer ID    No. (RUT)	Changes in Investments in Associates	Relationship	Country	Functional Currency	Ownership Interest			Balance at 1/1/2012 ThCh$		Additions		Acquisitions through Business Combinations under Common Control		Share of Profit (Loss) ThCh$		Dividends Declared ThCh$		Foreign Currency Translation ThCh$		Other Comprehensive Income ThCh$		Balance at 12/31/2012 ThCh$		Negative Equity Provision ThCh$		Balance at 12/31/2012
96,806,130-5	Electrogas S.A.	Associate	Chile	U.S. dollar		42.50	%		9,733,400		-		-		4,283,023		(4,186,063)		(761,847)		(38,072)		9,030,441		-		9,030,441
96,889,570-2	Inversiones Electrogas S.A.	Associate	Chile	Chilean peso		42.50	%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
76,788,080-4	GNL Quintero S.A.	Associate	Chile	U.S. dollar		20.00	%		-		-		-		5,198,419		(2,738,825)		644,605		782,465		3,886,664		(3,886,664)		-
76,418,940-K	GNL Chile S.A.	Associate	Chile	U.S. dollar		33.33	%		-		-		-		388,865		-		(5,373)		(6,657)		376,835		-		376,835
Foreign	Endesa Cemsa S.A.	Associate	Argentina	Argentine peso		45.00	%		3,428,480		-		-		(24,718)		-		(660,005)		(32)		2,743,725		-		2,743,725
Foreign	Sacme S.A.	Associate	Argentina	Argentine peso		50.00	%		31,382		-		-		313		-		(6,012)		-		25,683		-		25,683
76,652,400-1	Centrales Hidroeléctricas De Aysén S.A. (2)	Joint Venture	Chile	Chilean peso		51.00	%		60,050,165		7,140,000		-		(581,423)		-		-		286,018		66,894,760		-		66,894,760
77,017,930-0	Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. (2)	Joint Venture	Chile	Chilean peso		50.00	%		5,366,245		-		-		344,715		-		-		-		5,710,960		-		5,710,960
76,014,570-K	Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. (2)(3)	Joint Venture	Chile	U.S. dollar		50.00	%		84,810,956		-		-		18,304,801		-		(6,908,002)		-		96,207,755		-		96,207,755
Foreign	Distribuidora Eléctrica de Cundinamarca S.A. (2)	Joint Venture	Colombia	Colombian peso		49.00	%		31,365,089		-		-		2,467,941		-		419,106		(724,950)		33,527,186		-		33,527,186
						Total			194,785,717		7,140,000				30,381,936		(6,924,888)		(7,277,528)		298,772		218,404,009		(3,886,664)		214,517,345

(1) On March 31, 2013, Yacilec S.A. became an associated company and Endesa Cemsa S.A. ceased to be treated as an associate. As of that date, the latter began to be consolidated using the global integration method (see Note 2.4.1, Note 25.1.1, and Appendix 3). As of December 31, 2012, no changes in ownership interest in our investment associates had occurred.

(2) See Note 2.2.a).

(3) Among the assets of Gas Atacama, a company in which the Group holds a 50% interest, is a combined cycle power generation plant in the north of Chile. Since it has been impossible to import natural gas from neighboring countries, Gas Atacama has been forced to generate electricity using other fuels, whose cost has increased sharply since the last few months of 2007 due to higher oil prices. Consequently, the company filed lawsuits in order to get early termination of the agreement it has with the distributing company Emel. On January 25, 2008, the arbitration ruling denied early termination of the agreement. This situation significantly decreased the recoverable value of that plant, and a loss provision for impairment for US$110 million was recognized as of December 31, 2007.

F-68

b. Additional financial information on investments in associated companies and joint ventures

- Investments with significant influence

The following tables show financial information as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 from the Financial Statements of the investments in associates where the Group has significant influence:

Investments with Significant Influence	December 31, 2013
	%  Ownership   Interest	Current assets		Non-current assets		Current liabilities		Non-current liabilities		Revenues		Expenses		Profit (Loss)     ThCh$
		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
GNL Chile S.A	33.33%		82,737,334		79,263		78,005,985		3,131,599		538,715,428		(538,302,314)		413,114
GNL Quintero S.A	20.00%		88,131,062		566,951,431		34,063,764		597,031,096		100,431,648		(75,857,214)		24,574,434
Electrogas S.A.	42.50%		4,624,089		39,891,362		9,624,463		12,109,047		17,591,544		(7,741,439)		9,850,105
Yacylec S.A.	22.22%		1,886,165		942,725		353,430		-		1,069,690		(1,048,425)		21,265
Investments with Significant Influence	December 31, 2012
	%  Ownership   Interest	Current assets		Non-current assets		Current liabilities		Non-current liabilities		Revenues		Expenses		Profit (Loss)     ThCh$
		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Endesa Cemsa S.A.	45.00%		46,897,389		873,409		41,673,631		-		3,255,026		(3,309,953)		(54,927)
GNL Chile S.A	33.33%		82,659,263		117,782		78,867,051		2,779,376		863,830,524		(862,663,812)		1,166,712
GNL Quintero S.A	20.00%		72,284,363		541,694,388		27,968,039		610,947,052		101,634,665		(75,642,607)		25,992,058
Electrogas S.A.	42.50%		2,488,996		38,787,769		7,935,168		12,093,501		18,509,416		(8,431,715)		10,077,701
Investments with Significant Influence	January 1, 2012
	%  Ownership   Interest	Current assets		Non-current assets		Current liabilities		Non-current liabilities		Revenues		Expenses		Profit (Loss)     ThCh$
		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Endesa Cemsa S.A.	45.00%		49,705,466		820,787		42,907,410		-		3,423,785		(2,868,957)		554,828
GNL Chile S.A	33.33%		89,649,829		420,708		87,166,091		2,924,702		850,177,561		(848,810,789)		1,366,772
GNL Quintero S.A	20.00%		112,362,755		600,607,534		76,192,955		681,146,225		95,676,650		(75,397,751)		20,278,899
Electrogas S.A.	42.50%		2,688,608		44,772,738		9,510,888		15,048,487		17,218,630		(7,430,408)		9,788,222

Appendix 3 to these consolidated financial statements provides information on the main activities of our associated companies and the ownership interest the Group holds in them.

None of our associates have published price quotations.

F-69

- Joint ventures

The following tables present information from the financial statements as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 on the main joint ventures:

	December 31, 2013
	%  Ownership   Interest			Current assets		Non-current assets		Current liabilities		Non-current liabilities		Revenues		Expenses		Profit (Loss)     ThCh$
				ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén S.A.		51.00	%		9,596,488		131,270,190		4,049,634		180,059		-		(4,499,204)		(4,499,204)
Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda.		50.00	%		3,950,498		10,237,702		670,215		1,370,193		2,394,408		(1,668,535)		725,873
Gas Atacama S.A.		50.00	%		176,292,080		295,704,711		63,483,879		44,840,436		176,517,866		(142,513,575)		34,004,291
Distribuidora Eléctrica de Cundinamarca S.A.		48.99	%		15,945,571		141,431,674		40,895,186		38,118,486		74,900,665		(72,581,745)		2,318,920
	December 31, 2012
	%  Ownership   Interest			Current assets		Non-current assets		Current liabilities		Non-current liabilities		Revenues		Expenses		Profit (Loss)     ThCh$
				ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén S.A.		51.00%			10,081,574		127,061,491		5,728,373		248,465		-		(1,140,074)		(1,140,074)
Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda.		50.00%			3,273,653		9,921,635		503,949		1,269,420		2,265,866		(1,576,437)		689,429
Gas Atacama S.A.		50.00%			109,901,311		280,273,935		48,808,533		42,927,589		119,376,455		(82,726,987)		36,649,468
Distribuidora Eléctrica de Cundinamarca S.A.		48.99%			23,580,752		125,545,296		32,159,600		37,495,043		78,544,480		(72,427,700)		6,116,780
	January 1, 2012
	%  Ownership   Interest			Current assets		Non-current assets		Current liabilities		Non-current liabilities		Revenues		Expenses		Profit (Loss)     ThCh$
				ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén S.A.		51.00%			10,250,367		115,878,802		7,348,428		1,035,256		-		(4,664,851)		(4,664,851)
Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda.		50.00%			1,463,786		10,533,846		298,164		966,978		2,310,668		(1,632,824)		677,844
Gas Atacama S.A.		50.00%			93,103,848		314,752,350		77,452,973		45,808,413		260,889,567		(225,125,891)		35,763,676
Distribuidora Eléctrica de Cundinamarca S.A.		48.99%			19,548,243		111,718,071		21,888,384		35,217,903		67,811,590		(61,337,438)		6,474,152

See Appendix 3.

F-70

14. INTANGIBLE ASSETS OTHER THAN GOODWILL

Intangible assets as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 are detailed as follows:

Intangible Assets, Net	12-31-2013			12-31-2012			01-01-2012
	ThCh$			ThCh$			ThCh$
Intangible Assets, Net		1,173,560,361			1,202,002,511		1,466,680,979
Easements and water rights		42,779,382			44,569,633		33,622,818
Concessions, Net (1) (*)		1,060,466,808			1,093,803,169		1,369,031,940
Development costs		26,530,426			10,089,646		10,225,095
Patents, registered trademarks, and other rights		2,205,245			2,329,715		2,236,850
Computer software		38,718,081			48,350,377		48,306,229
Other identifiable intangible assets		2,860,419			2,859,971		3,258,047
Intangible Assets, Gross	12-31-2013			12-31-2012			01-01-2012
	ThCh$			ThCh$			ThCh$
Intangible Assets, Gross		2,272,683,994			2,223,804,143		2,360,908,325
Easements and water rights		51,797,051			52,590,938		40,228,629
Concessions		2,041,368,148			1,970,550,917		2,145,097,304
Development costs		36,248,290			19,265,571		17,640,985
Patents, registered trademarks, and other rights		11,253,851			10,146,623		9,110,394
Computer software		120,167,472			159,033,635		138,876,308
Other identifiable intangible assets		11,849,182			12,216,459		9,954,705
Intangible Assets, Net	12-31-2013			12-31-2012			01-01-2012
	ThCh$			ThCh$			ThCh$
Accumulated Amortization and Impairment, Total		(1,099,123,633	)		(1,021,801,632	)	(894,227,346)
Easements and Water Rights		(9,017,669	)		(8,021,305	)	(6,605,811)
Concessions		(980,901,340	)		(876,747,748	)	(776,065,364)
Development costs		(9,717,864	)		(9,175,925	)	(7,415,890)
Patents, registered trademarks, and other rights		(9,048,606	)		(7,816,908	)	(6,873,544)
Computer software		(81,449,391	)		(110,683,258	)	(90,570,079)
Other identifiable intangible assets		(8,988,763	)		(9,356,488	)	(6,696,658)

(*) See Note 3d.1).

(1) The detail of concessions is the following:

Concession Holder	Country	Term of Concession	Period  to Expiration	12-31-2013 ThCh$	12-31-2012 ThCh$	01-01-2012 ThCh$
Concesionaria Túnel el Melon S.A. (Infraestructura Vial)	Chile	23 years	2,5 years	6,951,508	10,049,562	12,152,979
Ampla Energia e Servicios S.A. (Distribución)	Brazil	30 years	13 years	598,037,526	625,413,669	733,283,981
Compañía Energetica do Ceara S.A. (Distribución)	Brazil	30 years	14 years	455,477,774	458,339,938	623,594,980
			TOTAL	1,060,466,808	1,093,803,169	1,369,031,940

During the 2012 fiscal year, the Brazilian regulatory agency changed the period in which it pays incentives for investments made in assets in electricity distribution concessions, which has resulted in a ThCh$108,639,110 decrease in the value of intangible assets recorded for the concession. This decrease has been offset by a similar increase in available-for-sale financial investments, as this change gives rise to a higher amount that can be recovered as payment for investments made where amortization is pending at the end of the concession period. See Note 7.

F-71

The reconciliation of the carrying amounts of intangible assets during the 2013 and 2012 fiscal years is as follows:

As of December 31, 2013

Changes in Intangible Assets	Development Costs,  Net		Easements and Water Rights, Net		Concessions, Net		Patents, Registered Trademarks, and Other Rights, Net		Computer Software, Net		Other Identifiable Intangible Assets, Net		Intangible Assets,  Net
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Opening balance at 1/1/2013		10,089,646		44,569,633		1,093,803,169		2,329,715		48,350,377		2,859,971	1,202,002,511
Changes in identifiable intangible assets
Additions		13,964,468		211,269		159,283,676		623,956		12,025,939		-	186,109,308
Acquisitions through business combinations under common control (1)		2,810,507								64,688		-	2,875,195
Disposals		(173,662)		-		-		-		(2,862)		-	(176,524)
Amortization (2)		(494,721)		(951,480)		(86,911,378)		(1,171,895)		(6,693,551)		(9,364)	(96,232,389)
Impairment losses recognized in profit or loss (3)						(28,662,952)							(28,662,952)
Foreign currency translation differences		450,410		43,038		(52,488,944)		5,318		(1,100,511)		10,119	(53,080,570)
Other increases (decreases)		(116,222)		(1,093,078)		(24,556,763)		418,151		(13,925,999)		(307)	(39,274,218)
Total changes in identifiable intangible assets		16,440,780		(1,790,251)		(33,336,361)		(124,470)		(9,632,296)		448	(28,442,150)
Closing balance in identifiable intangible assets at 12/31/2013		26,530,426		42,779,382		1,060,466,808		2,205,245		38,718,081		2,860,419	1,173,560,361
(1) See Note 2.4.1 and 25.1.1.      (2) (3) See Note 29. As of December 31, 2012
Changes in Intangible Assets	Development Costs,   Net		Easements and Water Rights, Net		Concessions, Net		Patents, Registered Trademarks, and Other Rights, Net		Computer Software, Net		Other Identifiable Intangible Assets, Net		Intangible Assets, Net
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Opening balance at 1/1/2012		10,225,095		33,622,818		1,369,031,940		2,236,850		48,306,229		3,258,047	1,466,680,979
Changes in identifiable tangible assets
Additions		3,972,388		1,049,888		149,026,486		526,775		23,080,976		25,162	177,681,675
Disposals		(1,104,668)		-		(1,303,906)		-		(12,842)		(1)	(2,421,417)
Amortization		(1,951,718)		(675,305)		(87,051,738)		(1,147,314)		(10,973,446)		(438,016)	(102,237,537)
Foreign currency translation differences		128,707		346,227		(213,403,284)		15,511		(4,011,403)		40,557	(216,883,685)
Other increases (decreases)		(1,180,158)		10,226,005		(122,496,329)		697,893		(8,039,137)		(25,778)	(120,817,504)
Total changes in identifiable intangible assets		(135,449)		10,946,815		(275,228,771)		92,865		44,148		(398,076)	(264,678,468)
Closing balance in identifiable intangible assets at 12/31/2012		10,089,646		44,569,633		1,093,803,169		2,329,715		48,350,377		2,859,971	1,202,002,511

According to the Group management’s estimates and projections, the expected future cash flows attributable to intangible assets allow recovery of the carrying amount of these assets recorded as of December 31, 2013 (see Note 3.e).

As of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012, the Company does not have significant intangible assets with an indefinite useful life.

F-72

15. GOODWILL

The following table shows goodwill by the Cash-Generating Unit or group of Cash-Generating Units to which it belongs and changes as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012:

Company	Opening Balance 1/1/2012 ThCh$		Transfers from Mergers ThCh$		Foreign Currency Translation ThCh$		Closing Balance 12/31/2012 ThCh$		Transfers from Mergers ThCh$		Foreign Currency Translation ThCh$		Closing Balance 12/31/2013 ThCh$
Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A. (1)		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Ampla Energia e Serviços S.A.		236,523,304		-		(37,853,331)		198,669,973		-		(9,497,678)		189,172,295
Investluz S.A. (6)		120,160,024		-		(19,230,482)		100,929,542		(96,104,474)		(4,825,068)		-
Empresa Eléctrica de Colina Ltda.		2,240,478		-		-		2,240,478		-		-		2,240,478
Compañía Distribuidora y Comercializadora de energía S.A.		11,589,629		-		153,012		11,742,641		-		43,890		11,786,531
Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. (3)		3,139,337		(3,139,337)		-		-		-		-		-
Endesa Costanera S.A. (2)		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Hidroeléctrica el Chocón S.A.		12,822,660		-		(2,476,733)		10,345,927		-		(1,780,725)		8,565,202
Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. (3)		1,516,768		3,139,337		-		4,656,105		(4,656,105)		-		-
Endesa Eco S.A. (4) (5)		-		-		-		-		4,656,105		-		4,656,105
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A		44,511,309		-		(1,184,185)		43,327,124		-		58,667		43,385,791
Cachoeira Dourada S.A.		86,727,286		-		(13,879,886)		72,847,400		-		(3,482,565)		69,364,835
Edegel S.A.A		83,779,595		-		(2,228,883)		81,550,712		-		110,423		81,661,135
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.		5,126,658		-		67,684		5,194,342		-		19,415		5,213,757
Chilectra S.A.		128,374,362		-		-		128,374,362		-		-		128,374,362
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A		731,782,459		-		-		731,782,459		-		-		731,782,459
Inversiones Distrilima S.A.		13,239		-		(352)		12,887		-		17		12,904
Endesa Brasil S.A. (6)		-		-		-		-		880,679		-		880,679
Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A. (6)		-		-		-		-		95,223,795		-		95,223,795
Total		1,468,307,108		-		(76,633,156)		1,391,673,952		-		(19,353,624)		1,372,320,328

(1) See Note 16.d) viii).

(2) See Note 35.5.

(3) Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. was merged with Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. on May 1, 2012; it is the latter company that legally continues to exist.

(4) Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. was merged with Endesa Eco S.A. on September 1, 2013; it is the latter company that legally continues to exist.

(5) Endesa Eco S.A. was merged with Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A. on November 1, 2013; it is the latter company that legally continues to exist.

(6) Investuz S.A. and Ampla Investimentos E Serviços S.A. were merged with Endesa Brasil S.A. on November 21, 2013; it is the latter company that legally continues to exist.

According to the Group management’s estimates and projections, the expected future cash flows projections attributable to the Cash-Generating Units or groups of Cash-Generating Units, to which the acquired goodwill has been allocated, allow recovery of its carrying value as of December 31, 2013 (see Note 3.e).

The origin of the goodwill is detailed below:

1.- Ampla Energia e Serviços S.A.

On November 20, 1996, Enersis S.A. and Chilectra S.A., together with Endesa S.A. and Electricidad de Portugal, acquired a controlling stake in the company Cerj S.A. (now Ampla de Energía) of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil. Enersis S.A. and Chilectra S.A. together bought 42% of the total shares in an international public bidding process held by the Brazilian government.

Enersis S.A. and Chilectra S.A. also bought an additional 18.5% on December 31, 2000, so that they then held a total 60.5% stake, directly and indirectly.

2.- Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A. (Coelce)

Between 1998 and 1999, Enersis S.A. and Chilectra S.A., together with Endesa S.A., acquired the company Compañía de Distribución Eléctrica del Estado de Ceará (Coelce) in northeast Brazil in an international public bidding process held by the Brazilian government.

3.- Empresa Eléctrica de Colina Ltda.

On September 30, 1996, Chilectra S.A. acquired 100% of the company Empresa Eléctrica de Colina Ltda. from the investment company Saint Thomas S.A., which is neither directly nor indirectly related to Chilectra S.A.

F-73

4.- Compañía Distribuidora y Comercializadora de Energía S.A. (Codensa S.A.)

On October 23, 1997, Enersis S.A. and Chilectra S.A., together with Endesa S.A., acquired 48.5% of Colombiana Codensa S.A., a company that distributes electricity in Santa Fé de Bogotá in Colombia. The purchase took place through an international public bidding process held by the Colombian government.

5.- Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A.

On July 12, 2002, Endesa Chile acquired 2.51% of the shares of Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. through a put option held by the minority shareholder Internacional Finance Corporation (IFC).

On May 2, 2012, Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. merged with Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A.; it is the latter company that legally continues to exist.

6.- Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.

On August 31, 1993, Endesa Chile acquired 59% of Hidroeléctrica El Chocón in an international public bidding process held by the Argentine government.

7.- Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A.

On August 11, 2005, Endesa Chile bought the shares of the company Inversiones Lo Venecia Ltda., whose only asset was a 25% interest in the company San Isidro S.A. (minority shareholder purchase).

8.- Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A.

On October 15, 2009 in a transaction on the Lima Stock Exchange, Enersis S.A. purchased an additional 24% interest in Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A. (Edelnor).

9.- Cachoeira Dourada S.A.

On September 5, 1997, our subsidiary Endesa Chile acquired 79% of the company Cachoeira Dourada S.A. in the state of Goias in a public bidding process held by the Brazilian government.

10.- Edegel S.A.A.

On October 9, 2009, in a transaction on the Lima Stock Exchange in Peru, our subsidiary Endesa Chile acquired an additional 29.3974% interest in Edegel S.A.

11.- Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.

On October 23, 1997, our subsidiary Endesa Chile, together with Endesa S.A., bought 48.5% of Emgesa S.A.E.S.P. in Colombia. The purchase was made in an international public bidding process held by the Colombian government.

12.- Chilectra S.A.

In November 2000, Enersis S.A. purchased an additional 25.4% interest in the subsidiary Chilectra S.A. through a purchasing power of attorney in a public bidding process, reaching a 99.99% stake in the company.

13.- Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.

On May 11, 1999, Enersis S.A. acquired an additional 35% in Endesa Chile in a public bidding process on the Santiago Stock Exchange and by buying shares in the U.S. (30% and 5%, respectively), reaching a 60% interest in the generation company.

F-74

16. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012:

Classes of Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$
Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net		7,433,798,725		7,049,923,571		7,045,908,847
Construction in progress		1,218,316,396		800,258,044		1,012,101,395
Land		99,869,574		100,075,276		100,324,671
Buildings		92,820,775		94,150,678		102,452,869
Plant and equipment		5,927,156,747		5,958,313,141		5,734,659,073
Fixtures and fittings		72,898,921		73,606,717		70,751,900
Other		22,736,312		23,519,715		25,618,939
Classes of Property, Plant, and Equipment, Gross	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$
Property, Plant, and Equipment, Gross		13,082,066,080		12,496,153,840		12,414,246,788
Construction in progress		1,218,316,396		800,258,044		1,012,101,395
Land		99,869,574		100,075,276		100,324,671
Buildings		170,612,273		169,912,377		180,117,671
Plant and equipment		11,350,782,091		11,194,092,949		10,886,610,920
Fixtures and fittings		211,988,702		201,400,253		202,811,841
Other		30,497,044		30,414,941		32,280,290
Classes of Accumulated Depreciation and Impairment in Property, Plant, and Equipment	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$
Total accumulated depreciation and impairment in property, plant, and equipment		(5,648,267,355)		(5,446,230,269)		(5,368,337,941)
Buildings		(77,791,498)		(75,761,699)		(77,664,802)
Plant and equipment		(5,423,625,344)		(5,235,779,808)		(5,151,951,847)
Fixtures and fittings		(139,089,781)		(127,793,536)		(132,059,941)
Other		(7,760,732)		(6,895,226)		(6,661,351)

F-75

The detail of, and changes in, property, plant, and equipment during the 2013 and the 2012 fiscal years are as follows:

Changes in 2013		Construction in Progress		Land		Buildings, Net		Plant and Equipment, Net		Fixtures and Fittings, Net		Other Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net		Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net
		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Opening balance at January 1, 2013			800,258,044		100,075,276		94,150,678		5,958,313,141		73,606,717		23,519,715	7,049,923,571
Changes	Additions		693,084,284		150,828		996,596		311,373		8,533,951		-	703,077,032
	Acquisitions through business combinations under common control (1)		53,274,335		814,674		298,215		58,015,823		1,771,530		-	114,174,577
	Disposals		(1,136,402)		(1,395,944)		321,584		(4,172,658)		(667,319)		-	(7,050,739)
	Depreciation expense (2)		-		-		(4,706,723)		(320,189,659)		(13,464,577)		(879,911)	(339,240,870)
	Impairment losses recognized in profit or loss (3)		(272,181)		-		-		(12,388,154)		-		-	(12,660,335)
	Foreign currency translation differences		(19,482,775)		38,929		(2,619,529)		(57,214,048)		(1,960,839)		(151,477)	(81,389,739)
	Other increases (decreases)		(307,408,909)		185,811		4,379,954		304,480,929		5,079,458		247,985	6,965,228
	Total changes		418,058,352		(205,702)		(1,329,903)		(31,156,394)		(707,796)		(783,403)	383,875,154
Closing balance at December 31, 2013			1,218,316,396		99,869,574		92,820,775		5,927,156,747		72,898,921		22,736,312	7,433,798,725
Changes in 2012		Construction in Progress		Land		Buildings, Net		Plant and Equipment, Net		Fixtures and Fittings, Net		Other Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net		Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net
		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Opening balance at January 1, 2012			1,012,101,395		100,324,671		102,452,869		5,734,659,073		70,751,900		25,618,939	7,045,908,847
Changes	Additions		485,985,638		59,394		365,995		17,948,017		7,914,072		-	512,273,116
	Disposals		(7,978)		(299,511)		48,956		(1,976,072)		(170,099)		-	(2,404,704)
	Depreciation expense		-		-		(5,008,299)		(311,412,246)		(14,931,269)		(894,383)	(332,246,197)
	Impairment loss recognized in profit or loss		-		-		-		(12,578,098)		-		-	(12,578,098)
	Foreign currency translation differences		(23,506,303)		(453,958)		(5,672,621)		(128,134,949)		(4,738,077)		(292,536)	(162,798,444)
	Other increases (decreases)		(674,314,708)		444,680		1,963,778		659,807,416		14,780,190		(912,305)	1,769,051
	Total changes		(211,843,351)		(249,395)		(8,302,191)		223,654,068		2,854,817		(2,099,224)	4,014,724
Closing balance at December 31, 2012			800,258,044		100,075,276		94,150,678		5,958,313,141		73,606,717		23,519,715	7,049,923,571

        (1) See Note 2.4.1 and 25.1.1.

        (2) (3) See Note 29.

Major additions to property, plant and equipment are investments in operating plants and new projects by ThCh$353,533,733 in 2013 (ThCh$ 281,703,466 in 2012). In the generation business highlights the progress in the construction of the Central Hydraulics El Quimbo in Colombia (400 MW), involving additions in 2013 by ThCh$ 150,262,546 (ThCh$ 174,261,499 in 2012), while in the distribution business major investments are network extensions and investments to optimize their operation, in order to improve the efficiency and quality of service level, by ThCh$ 274,964,283 in 2013 (ThCh$ 220,411,619 in 2012).

a) Main investments

Material investments in the electricity generation business include developments in the program to create new capacity.

In Colombia, the Central Hidráulica El Quimbo, a hydroelectric dam with 400W of installed capacity and an average annual generation of some 2,216 GWh, is currently under construction.

b) Finance leases

As of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012, property, plant, and equipment includes ThCh$115,416,339, ThCh$126,760,139, and ThCh$137,092,811, respectively, in leased assets classified as finance leases.

The present value of future lease payments derived from these finance leases is as follows:

	12-31-2013						12-31-2012						01-01-2012
	Gross  ThCh$		Interest   ThCh$		Present Value     ThCh$		Gross       ThCh$		Interest   ThCh$		Present Value     ThCh$		Gross     ThCh$		Interest     ThCh$		Present Value       ThCh$
Less than one year		15,915,072		1,868,169		14,046,903		12,154,120		1,929,701		10,224,419		15,954,189		2,145,937		13,808,252
From one to five years		58,429,290		5,874,399		52,554,891		40,346,759		3,945,765		36,400,994		39,105,238		5,827,660		33,277,578
More than five years		38,025,761		3,295,944		34,729,817		13,016,926		2,211,594		10,805,331		27,619,488		2,457,926		25,161,562
Total		112,370,123		11,038,512		101,331,611		65,517,805		8,087,060		57,430,744		82,678,915		10,431,523		72,247,392

F-76

Leasing assets primarily relate to:

1. Endesa Chile S.A.: a lease agreement for Electric Transmission Lines and Installations (Ralco-Charrúa 2X220 KV) entered into between Endesa Chile and Abengoa Chile S.A. The lease agreement has a 20-year maturity and bears interest at an annual rate of 6.5%.

2. Edegel S.A.: lease agreements to finance the project of converting the Ventanilla thermoelectric plant to a combined cycle plant. The agreements were signed between Edegel S.A.A. and the financial institutions BBVA - Banco Continental, Banco de Crédito del Perú, Citibank del Peru, and Banco Internacional del Peru - Interbank. These agreements have an average term of 8 years and bear interest at an annual rate of Libor + 2.5% as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012.

The company also has an agreement with Scotiabank, which financed the construction of a new open cycle plant at the Santa Rosa Plant. This agreement has a term of 9 years and bears interest an annual rate of Libor + 1.75%.

c) Operating leases

The consolidated statements of income at December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 include ThCh$18,878,285, ThCh$18,483,171, and ThCh$16,502,843, respectively, corresponding to accrual during these periods of operating lease contracts for material assets in operation.

As of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012, the total future lease payments under those contracts are as follows:

	12-31-2013      ThCh$	12-31-2012      ThCh$	01-01-2012     ThCh$
Less than one year	10,447,299	18,932,624	7,690,811
From one to five years	41,971,517	34,901,830	21,347,042
More than five years	65,678,252	69,870,162	41,634,563
Total	118,097,068	123,704,616	70,672,416

d) Other information

i) As of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012, the Group had contractual commitments for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment amounting to ThCh$350,969,175, ThCh$229,011,250, and ThCh$179,872,981, respectively.

ii) As of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012, the Group had property, plant and equipment pledged as security for liabilities in the amount of ThCh$176,514,115, ThCh$175,143,405, and ThCh$328,844,715, respectively (see Note 35).

iii) The Company and its foreign subsidiaries have insurance policies for all risks, earthquake and machinery breakdown and damages for business interruption with a US$500 million limit in the case of generating companies and a US$50 million limit for distribution companies, including business interruption coverage. The premiums associated with these policies are presented proportionally for each company under the line item “Other non-financial current assets”.

iv) The situation of certain assets of our subsidiary Endesa Chile has changed, primarily works and infrastructure for facilities built to support power generation in the SIC grid in 1998, due primarily to the installation in the SIC of new thermoelectric plants, the arrival of LNG, and new projects that will be starting up soon. This has resulted in a new supply configuration for the coming years, in which it is expected that these facilities will not need to be used. Therefore, in the 2009 fiscal year, the company recorded an impairment provision of ThCh$43,999,600 for these assets.

F-77

v) As a result of the February 27, 2010 earthquake in Chile, some of our plant and equipment were partially or totally impaired. The impact on our total assets, however, is minor as the only facilities that suffered some damage in infrastructure were the Bocamina I and Bocamina II plants, as well as a few other assets from our distribution business.

Due to these impairments, we have written down ThCh$369,643 in assets. Additionally, the Group had to incur expenditures related to repair and capital improvements totaling ThCh$9,733,426, primarily at the Bocamina I plant. All of the disbursements incurred were covered by insurance.

It is worth noting that the Group has the necessary insurance coverage for these types of exceptional claims, which provide coverage for material damage as well as business interruption (see Note 26).

vi) On October 16, 2012, Endesa Chile began the collection process on all of the bank performance bonds guaranteeing compliance with the works and correct, timely execution of these works as specified in the agreement “Bocamina Thermal Plant Expansion Project”, contract ACP-003.06. This is a turnkey project for a 350 MW coal-fired thermal generation plant (“the contract”) signed on July 25, 2007 between Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. (“the owner”) and the consortium consisting of (i) the Chilean company Ingeniería y Construcción Tecnimont Chile y Compañía Limitada; (ii) the Italian company Tecnimont SpA; (iii) the Brazilian company Tecnimont do Brasil Construcao e Administracao de Projetos Ltda; (iv) the Slovakian company Slovenske Energeticke Strojarne a.s. (“SES”); and (v) the Chilean company Ingeniería y Construcción SES Chile Limitada; (all referred to collectively as “the Contractor” or “the Consortium”).

These performance bonds total US$74,795,164.44 and UF796,594.29 (approximately US$38,200,000). The amount actually collected on the bonds as of December 31, 2012 was US$93,996,585.73, with a pending balance to be collected of US$18,940,294.84.

Collection made on these bank performance bonds reduced the cost overruns incurred by the company due to breach of contract; they were capitalized into the Project.

Together collecting on the bonds, Endesa Chile has reserved all of the rights conferred upon it under the Contract and applicable national legislation to demand complete, timely compliance with the obligations agreed to by the Contractor.

On October 17, 2012, Endesa Chile filed an arbitration request with the International Chamber of Arbitration of Paris in order to enforce the rights conferred upon it under the Contract.

vii) Our subsidiary Companhia de Interconexão Energética (“CIEN”) was initially in the business of selling electricity in Argentina and Brazil. However, because of the reduction in the availability of power generation and physical guarantee of energy and its associated power, the Company has focused its business on a different compensation structure that is not based on the purchase and sale of energy between the countries. Given the strategic importance of the Company’s assets in the relations between Brazil and Argentina, the Company and the Brazilian Government have jointly drawn up a new business plan model changing its selling activity to an electricity transmission activity with payment of a fixed compensation. This new plan involves integrating its transmission lines with the Brazilian transmission grid operated by the Brazilian government.

In prior periods, the Argentine and Uruguayan Governments formalized toll payments with the Company to transport energy between the two countries. Management considers that this situation further emphasizes the importance of the application made to the Brazilian government to approve the new business plan and considers that it will probably be approved. In addition, on June 4, 2010 the Company signed a new transmission contract for a six-month period for a total of US$155 million to cover the energy transmission required by the Argentine government.

Finally, on April 5, 2011, theDiario Oficial(The Official Gazette) publishedPortarías Ministeriales (Ministerial Decrees) 210/2011 and 211/2011 that equipped Companhia de Interconexao Energética, S.A. (CIEN) with a regulated interconnection line involving payment of a regulated toll. TheReceita Anual Permitida (RAP), or income permitted annually, corresponded to 248 million Brazilian reals, to be adjusted according to the Broad National Consumer Price Index (IPCA) every year in June and with the rate to be reviewed every four years. The Line 1

F-78

concession lasts until June 2020 and the Line 2 concession until July 2022, with compensation provisions for non-amortized investments. This successfully concludes the change in CIEN’s business model that we had previously reported (see Note 3e).

viii)      Our Argentine subsidiary, Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A., has seen its financial equilibrium seriously affected by the delay in the compliance with certain points of the Acta de Acuerdo agreement signed with the Argentine Government, particularly the twice-yearly rate adjustments recognized through the cost-monitoring mechanism (MMC) and the establishment of an Integral Rate Review (IRT) as provided for in this agreement.

At the close of the 2011 fiscal year, Enersis recorded an impairment loss of ThCh$106,449,843 for the Property, Plant and Equipment of Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A. (see Note 3.e), as well as an additional loss of ThCh$8,931,451 for the complete impairment of the purchase goodwill that was assigned to its Argentine subsidiary (see Note 15).

In May 2013 Resolution 250/13 was published recognizing the expenses not transferred to power tariffs from 2007 to February 2013 in the application of the Cost Monitoring Mechanisms (MMC). In addition, in November 2013, Note 6852/13 from the Argentine Energy Secretariat, in line with Resolution 250/13, allowed Edesur to recognize expenses not transferred to power tariffs from March 2013 to September 2013. This has enabled Edesur to recognize ThCh$250,533,319 under “Other operating income.”

ix) At the end of the 2012 fiscal year, our subsidiary Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A. recorded an impairment loss for ThCh$12,578,098 to adjust the book value of its Properties, plants, and equipment to their recoverable value (see Note 3.e).

17. INVESTMENT PROPERTY

The detail of, and changes in, investment property during the 2013 and 2012 fiscal years is as follows:

Investment Properties	ThCh$
Opening balance at January 1, 2012	38,055,889
Additions	7,936,694
Disposals	(1,646,504)
Depreciation expense	(69,374)
Impairment losses reversed, recognized in profit or loss (*)	2,646,265
Balance at December 31, 2012	46,922,970
Additions	2,487,919
Disposals	(4,474,762)
Depreciation expense	(59,078)
Closing balance investment properties at December 31, 2013	44,877,049

The fair value of the Group’s investment properties as of December 31, 2012, determined on the basis of valuations carried out internally, was ThCh$47,410,152. As of December 31, 2013, the market value of these properties is M$45,821,677.

The selling price of investment properties disposed of in the 2013 and 2012 fiscal years were ThCh$16,510,931 and ThCh$9,594,069, respectively.

The amounts recognized in profit or loss during the 2013 and 2012 fiscal years as direct operating expenses arising from investment properties were not significant.

The Group has insurance policies to cover operational risks of its investment properties, as well as to cover legal claims against the Group that could potentially arise from exercising its business activity. The Group’s management considers that the insurance policy coverage is sufficient against the risks involved.

F-79

18. DEFERRED TAX

a.        The origin and changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 are as follows:

Deferred Tax Assets		Deferred Tax Assets Relating to														Deferred Tax    Assets
		Depreciation		Amortization		Provisions		Post- Employment Benefit Obligations		Revaluation of Financial Instruments		Tax Losses		Other
Opening balance at January 1, 2013			75,826,789		10,700,455		98,105,401		46,865,082		47,115,495		8,635,197		34,307,797	321,556,216
Changes	Increase (decrease) in profit or loss		(4,189,296)		(850,759)		4,955,202		(1,494,579)		(3,355,784)		(16,669,753)		6,745,508	(14,859,461)
	Increase (decrease) in comprehensive income		(418,615)		-		-		(6,028,387)		511,656		5,010,578		-	(924,768)
	Acquisitions through business combinations		-		-		-		-		-		11,634,643		381,719	12,016,362
	Foreign currency translation		(553,272)		(190,829)		(3,206,774)		(804,512)		(9,658)		630,288		(2,369,230)	(6,503,987)
	Other increase (decrease)		(1,334,578)		(9,658,867)		(27,657,431)		(37,815,662)		(602,193)		(7,530,665)		(16,547,199)	(101,146,595)
Closing balance at December 31, 2013			69,331,028		-		72,196,398		721,942		43,659,516		1,710,288		22,518,595	210,137,767
Deferred Tax Assets		Deferred Tax Assets Relating to														Deferred Tax   Assets
		Depreciation		Amortization		Provisions		Post- Employment Benefit Obligations		Revaluation of Financial Instruments		Tax Losses		Other
Opening balance at January 1, 2012			85,899,933		12,326,434		116,303,761		38,774,551		37,813,186		18,343,781		57,574,862	367,036,508
Changes	Increase (decrease) in profit or loss		(234,846)		(923,104)		(9,067,982)		(971,325)		13,273,701		570,080		24,133,354	26,779,878
	Increase (decrease) in comprehensive income		-		-		-		1,107,351		(1,913,761)		-		158,459	(647,951)
	Foreign currency translation		576,313		(702,875)		(16,787,113)		(5,532,742)		(94,336)		-		(8,688,517)	(31,229,270)
	Other increase (decrease)		(10,414,611)		-		7,656,735		13,487,247		(1,963,295)		(10,278,664)		(38,870,361)	(40,382,949)
Closing balance at December 31, 2012			75,826,789		10,700,455		98,105,401		46,865,082		47,115,495		8,635,197		34,307,797	321,556,216

Deferred Tax Liabilities		Deferred Tax Liabilities Relating to														Deferred   Tax    Liabilities
		Depreciation		Amortization		Provisions		Foreign Currency Contracts		Post- Employment Benefit Obligations		Revaluation of Financial Instruments		Other
Opening balance at January 1, 2013			371,424,034		41,745,931		-		-		17,080		6,425,224		81,515,428	501,127,697
Changes	Increase (decrease) in profit or loss		(19,041,347)		(1,760,684)		6,696,045		-		71,264		937,186		4,084,369	(9,013,167)
	Increase (decrease) in comprehensive income		(476)		-		-		-		(2,744,987)		553,068		(61,684)	(2,254,079)
	Acquisitions through business combinations		8,534,296		-		-		-		-		-		-	8,534,296
	Foreign currency translation		(43,599)		(1,410,853)		(1,219,749)		-		-		(10,209)		(1,901,703)	(4,586,113)
	Other increase (decrease)		(3,467,998)		(17,404,697)		(5,456,076)		-		2,677,461		(2,112,544)		(72,557,890)	(98,321,744)
Closing balance at December 31, 2013			357,404,910		21,169,697		20,220		-		20,818		5,792,725		11,078,520	395,486,890
																-
Deferred Tax Liabilities		Deferred Tax Liabilities Relating to														Deferred   Tax    Liabilities
		Depreciation		Amortization		Provisions		Foreign Currency Contracts		Post- Employment Benefit Obligations		Revaluation of Financial Instruments		Other
Opening balance at January 1, 2012			397,272,250		48,236,269		4,431,328		107,097		5,074,020		880,379		26,258,919	482,260,262
Changes	Increase (decrease) in profit or loss		29,393,002		(2,284,313)		(633,757)		-		10,222		1,352,762		51,604,441	79,442,357
	Increase (decrease) in comprehensive income		-		-		-		-		-		3,284,076		(153,866)	3,130,210
	Foreign currency translation		(5,988,880)		(4,206,025)		-		-		-		13,811		(12,263,943)	(22,445,037)
	Other increase (decrease)		(49,252,338)		-		(3,797,571)		(107,097)		(5,067,162)		894,196		16,069,877	(41,260,095)
Closing balance at December 31, 2012			371,424,034		41,745,931		-		-		17,080		6,425,224		81,515,428	501,127,697

F-80

Recovery of deferred tax assets will depend on whether sufficient tax profits are obtained in the future. The Company believes that the future profit projections for its numerous subsidiaries will allow these assets to be recovered.

b.     As of December 31, 2013, the Group has not recognized deferred tax assets related to tax losses totaling ThCh$25,233,492 (ThCh$66,185,825 and ThCh$39,313,993 as of December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively). See Note 3.o.

The Enersis Group has not recognized deferred tax liabilities for taxable temporary differences associated with investment in subsidiaries and joint ventures, as it is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and considers that it is probable that such temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. The aggregate amount of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries and joint ventures for which deferred tax liabilities have not been recognized totaled ThCh$2,204,237,044 as of December 31, 2013 (ThCh$2,279,916,304 and ThCh$2,204,409,498 at December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively).

The Group companies are potentially subject to income tax audits by the tax authorities of each country in which the Group operates. Such tax audits are limited to a number of annual tax periods and once these have expired audits of these periods can no longer be performed.

Tax audits by nature are often complex and can require several years to complete. The following table presents a summary of tax years potentially subject to examination:

Country	Period
Chile	2008-2013
Argentina	2008-2013
Brazil	2008-2013
Colombia	2011-2013
Peru	2009-2013

Given the range of possible interpretations of tax standards, the results of any future inspections carried out by tax authorities for the years subject to audit can give rise to tax liabilities that cannot currently be quantified objectively. Nevertheless, Enersis Management estimates that the liabilities, if any, that may arise from such audits, would not significantly impact the Group companies’ future results.

The effects of deferred tax on the components of other comprehensive income are as follows:

Effects of Deferred Tax on the     Components of Other Comprehensive     Income	December 31, 2013						December 31, 2012
	Amount Before     Tax     ThCh$		Income Tax     Expense     (Benefit)     ThCh$		Amount After     Tax     ThCh$		Amount Before     Tax     ThCh$		Income Tax    Expense    (Benefit)     ThCh$		Amount After Tax ThCh$
Available-for-sale financial assets		(2,273)		455		(1,818)		515		(569)	(54)
Cash flow hedge		(76,088,977)		12,332,516		(63,756,461)		66,059,410		(25,726,629)	40,332,781
Amount of other comprehensive income from associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method		8,367,223		-		8,367,223		737,736		-	737,736
Foreign currency translation		(76,723,893)		-		(76,723,893)		(364,848,647)		-	(364,848,647)
Actuarial income on defined-benefit pension plans		6,351,518		(2,603,231)		3,748,287		(14,044,750)		4,662,040	(9,382,710)
Income tax related to components of other income and expenses debited or credited to Equity		(138,096,402)		9,729,740		(128,366,662)		(312,095,736)		(21,065,158)	(333,160,894)

F-81

19. OTHER FINANCIAL LIABILITIES

The balance of other financial liabilities as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 is as follows:

Other Financial Liabilities		December 31, 2013				December 31, 2012				January 1, 2012
		Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$		Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$		Current ThCh$		Non-current   ThCh$
Interest-bearing loans			785,231,174		2,688,538,096		651,129,701		2,687,724,262		650,515,283	3,049,197,963
Hedging derivatives (*)			117,341,051		97,231,764		4,850,754		233,368,171		6,200,643	212,913,735
Non-hedging derivatives (**)			1,410,556		-		-		-		807,105	-
Obligation for Túnel El Melón concession			2,692,424		4,479,251		2,442,847		7,027,436		2,207,755	9,243,595
Other financial liabilities			-		-		-		-		831,772	-
	Total		906,675,205		2,790,249,111		658,423,302		2,928,119,869		660,562,558	3,271,355,293

(*) See Note 21.2.a.

(**) See Note 21.2.b.

19.1 Interest-bearing Borrowings

The detail of current and non-current interest-bearing borrowings as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 is as follows:

Classes of Loans that Accrue Interest			December 31, 2013				December 31, 2012				January 1, 2012
			Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$		Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$		Current ThCh$		Non-current   ThCh$
Bank loans				154,917,772		219,963,968		106,830,823		292,400,621		278,193,752	316,103,001
Unsecured obligations				407,412,807		2,179,772,922		394,389,956		2,204,708,298		242,785,757	2,439,913,903
Secured obligations		��		4,828,233		-		4,880,687		4,689,387		10,660,476	9,635,108
Finance leases				14,046,903		87,284,708		10,224,419		47,206,325		13,808,252	58,439,140
Other loans				204,025,459		201,516,498		134,803,816		138,719,631		105,067,046	225,106,811
	Total			785,231,174		2,688,538,096		651,129,701		2,687,724,262		650,515,283	3,049,197,963

Bank loans by currency and contractual maturity as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 are as follows:

            -Summary of bank loans by currency and contractual maturity

Country	Currency	Nominal       Interest       Rate		Secured/         Unsecured							Non-current
					Maturity				Total current   at 12/31/2013		Maturity						Total non-    current at    12/31/2013
					One to three  months		Three to  twelve months				One to three   years		Three to five  years		More than  five years
					ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Chile	US$		2.29%	Unsecured		404,070		106,087,194		106,491,264		858,299		-		-	858,299
Chile	Ch$		5.67%	Unsecured		1,523		176		1,699		-		-		-	-
Peru	US$		2.78%	Unsecured		2,676,462		2,785,037		5,461,499		22,038,803		27,745,371		-	49,784,174
Peru	Sol		5.41%	Unsecured		150,822		-		150,822		-		22,539,537		-	22,539,537
Argentina	US$		9.31%	Unsecured		6,425,910		4,853,256		11,279,166		1,617,752		-		-	1,617,752
Argentina	Ar$		27.55%	Unsecured		14,322,039		9,470,728		23,792,767		15,222,302		-		-	15,222,302
Colombia	CP		6.84%	Unsecured		-		188,239		188,239		-		-		82,965,288	82,965,288
Brazil	US$		7.70%	Unsecured		69,098		7,173,489		7,242,587		11,708,419		5,280,170		1,064,912	18,053,501
Brazil	Real		10.12%	Unsecured		-		309,729		309,729		-		19,282,077		9,641,038	28,923,115
				Total		24,049,924		130,867,848		154,917,772		51,445,575		74,847,155		93,671,238	219,963,968

F-82

Country	Currency	Nominal     Interest     Rate	Secured/     Unsecured							Non-current
				Maturity				Total current at 12/31/2012		Maturity						Total non- current at 12/31/2012
				One to three months		Three to twelve months				One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years
				ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Chile	US$	1.76%	Unsecured		354,739		1,191,983		1,546,722		97,967,390		-		-		97,967,390
Chile	Ch$	4.90%	Unsecured		432		-		432		-		-		-		-
Peru	US$	3.49%	Unsecured		1,806,758		444,835		2,251,593		10,632,998		25,699,999		12,010,552		48,343,549
Peru	Sol	5.50%	Unsecured		187,239		-		187,239		-		1,875,756		20,633,302		22,509,058
Argentina	US$	8.91%	Unsecured		7,214,852		4,421,192		11,636,044		7,368,666		-		-		7,368,666
Argentina	Ar$	20.96%	Unsecured		29,367,103		25,564,977		54,932,080		10,429,806		-		-		10,429,806
Colombia	CP	8.12%	Unsecured		1,710,131		-		1,710,131		-		82,656,349		-		82,656,349
Brazil	US$	7.79%	Unsecured		-		6,199,249		6,199,249		13,651,212		7,623,414		1,851,177		23,125,803
Brazil	Real	7.47%	Unsecured		5,001,762		23,365,571		28,367,333		-		-		-		-
			Total		45,643,016		61,187,807		106,830,823		140,050,072		117,855,518		34,495,031		292,400,621
Country	Currency	Nominal     Interest     Rate	Secured/     Unsecured							Non-current
				Maturity				Total current at 1/1//2012		Maturity						Total non- current at 01/01/2012
				One to three months		Three to twelve months				One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years
				ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Chile	US$	1.97%	Unsecured		84,500		1,607,710		1,692,210		107,025,578		849,449		-		107,875,027
Peru	US$	3.63%	Unsecured		2,354,628		8,838,878		11,193,506		4,296,544		19,212,039		26,158,087		49,666,670
Peru	Sol	5.20%	Unsecured		310,428		1,541,618		1,852,046		-		-		30,832,352		30,832,352
Argentina	US$	5.28%	Unsecured		494,597		6,393,975		6,888,572		17,983,101		1,598,484		-		19,581,585
Argentina	Ar$	21.17%	Unsecured		37,631,229		17,687,954		55,319,183		40,368,276		2,414,084		-		42,782,360
Colombia	CP	6.48%	Unsecured		-		86,794,795		86,794,795		-		-		-		-
Brazil	US$	6.05%	Unsecured		-		5,825,541		5,825,541		13,909,371		11,722,036		6,352,599		31,984,006
Brazil	Real	12.89%	Unsecured		9,173,097		99,454,802		108,627,899		33,381,001		-		-		33,381,001
			Total		50,048,479		228,145,273		278,193,752		216,963,871		35,796,092		63,343,038		316,103,001

The fair value of current and non-current bank borrowings as of December 31, 2013 totaled ThCh$371,446,585 (ThCh$405,226,404 and ThCh$582,919,972 as of December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively).

F-83

- Identification of Bank Borrowings by Company

Taxpayer   ID No.   (RUT)	Company	Country	ID No. Financial Institution	Financial Institution	Country	Currency	Effective  Interest  Rate	Nominal  Interest  Rate	Amortization	December 31, 2013
										Current ThCh$						Non-current ThCh$
										Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years			Total Non- current
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Foreign	Banco Alfa	Brazil	Real	6.97%	7.25%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Foreign	Banco do Brasil	Brazil	Real	9.61%	10.12%	At maturity		-		309,729		309,729		-		19,282,077		9,641,038		28,923,115
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Foreign	Banco HSBC	Brazil	Real	9.93%	9.77%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Foreign	Banco Itaú	Brazil	Real	10.12%	10.20%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Foreign	Brasdesco	Brazil	Real	9.75%	5.65%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Foreign	Unibanco	Brazil	Real	10.27%	10.29%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Central Generadora Termoeléctrica Fortaleza S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	IFC - A	Brazil	US$	7.97%	8.04%	Semi-annually		41,076		2,796,717		2,837,793		6,231,381		3,466,603		-		9,697,984
Foreign	Central Generadora Termoeléctrica Fortaleza S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	IFC - B	Brazil	US$	2.74%	2.73%	Semi-annually		9,841		4,376,772		4,386,613		4,707,155		-		-		4,707,155
Foreign	Central Generadora Termoeléctrica Fortaleza S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	IFC - C	Brazil	US$	12.08%	12.31%	Semi-annually		18,181		-		18,181		769,883		1,813,567		1,064,912		3,648,362
96.800.570-7	Chilectra S.A.	Chile		Bank credit lines	Chile	Ch$	5.91%	5.91%	Other		198		-		198		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	3.85%	3.80%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Foreign	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	US$	4.02%	3.96%	Quarterly		228,354		488,235		716,589		1,301,959		13,833,314		-		15,135,273
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Foreign	Bank Of Nova Scotia	Peru	US$	3.05%	3.01%	Quarterly		348,176		984,344		1,332,520		2,624,917		1,312,456		-		3,937,373
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Foreign	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	US$	0.76%	0.78%	At maturity		2,099,932		-		2,099,932		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Compañía de Interconexión Energética S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Santander	Brazil	Real	11.61%	11.80%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	US$	3.42%	3.38%	Quarterly		-		1,312,458		1,312,458		18,111,927		12,599,601		-		30,711,528
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	US$	3.45%	3.41%	Quarterly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	US$	2.99%	2.96%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco de Crédito	Peru	US$	1.65%	1.65%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	AV VILLAS	Colombia	CP	8.44%	8.27%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	Banco Davivienda	Colombia	CP	8.15%	7.91%	Yearly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	Banco Santander	Colombia	CP	8.15%	7.91%	Yearly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	Bancolombia	Colombia	CP	8.44%	8.27%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	Bancolombia	Colombia	CP	8.44%	8.27%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	BBVA Colombia	Colombia	CP	6.89%	6.78%	At maturity		-		138,223		138,223		-		-		61,203,901		61,203,901
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	Banco Corpbanca	Colombia	CP	7.01%	6.90%	At maturity		-		50,016		50,016		-		-		21,761,387		21,761,387
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco de Crédito	Peru	Sol	5.43%	5.32%	Quarterly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco de Crédito	Peru	Sol	5.43%	5.32%	Quarterly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco de Crédito	Peru	Sol	5.43%	5.32%	Quarterly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco de Crédito	Peru	Sol	5.43%	5.32%	Quarterly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco de Crédito	Peru	Sol	5.43%	5.32%	Quarterly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco de Crédito	Peru	Sol	5.43%	5.32%	Quarterly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	Sol	6.90%	6.73%	Quarterly		25,939		-		25,939		-		1,878,295		-		1,878,295
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	Sol	5.83%	5.71%	Quarterly		85,979		-		85,979		-		3,944,419		-		3,944,419
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	5.10%	5.01%	Quarterly		9,359		-		9,359		-		2,817,442		-		2,817,442
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	5.10%	5.01%	Quarterly		14,947		-		14,947		-		4,695,737		-		4,695,737
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	5.10%	5.01%	Quarterly		8,105		-		8,105		-		4,507,907		-		4,507,907
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	5.10%	5.01%	Quarterly		6,493		-		6,493		-		4,695,737		-		4,695,737
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	5.43%	5.32%	Quarterly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco de Crédito	Peru	Sol	5.43%	5.32%	Quarterly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco de Interbank	Peru	Sol	6.90%	6.73%	Quarterly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires	Argentina	Ar$	22.63%	28.38%	Monthly		34,976		2,015,680		2,050,656		2,983,206		-		-		2,983,206
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Frances	Argentina	Ar$	22.63%	20.30%	Monthly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Galicia	Argentina	Ar$	22.63%	21.00%	Monthly		67,383		-		67,383		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Itaú	Argentina	Ar$	22.63%	30.29%	Quarterly		45,166		907,056		952,222		907,056		-		-		907,056
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Macro	Argentina	Ar$	22.63%	29.56%	Monthly		216,262		806,272		1,022,534		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Provincia de Buenos Aires	Argentina	Ar$	22.63%	25.03%	Monthly		6,468		241,882		248,350		483,763		-		-		483,763
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Santander Río	Argentina	Ar$	22.63%	25.56%	Monthly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Santander Río	Argentina	Ar$	22.63%	27.23%	Monthly		113,687		2,015,679		2,129,366		1,612,544		-		-		1,612,544
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Santander Río	Argentina	Ar$	23.03%	21.26%	Quarterly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Santander Río	Argentina	Ar$	21.28%	19.75%	Quarterly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Santander Río	Argentina	Ar$	23.10%	21.00%	Quarterly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Supervielle	Argentina	Ar$	22.63%	23.00%	Monthly		1,397		71,491		72,888		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	BBVA	Argentina	Ar$	19.55%	18.00%	Monthly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	BBVA	Argentina	Ar$	21.55%	20.00%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Citibank	Argentina	Ar$	22.63%	22.50%	Monthly		7,038		518,946		525,984		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Citibank	Argentina	Ar$	24.06%	21.75%	Monthly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Comafi	Argentina	Ar$	22.63%	23.00%	Monthly		22,646		-		22,646		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Standard Bank	Argentina	Ar$	22.63%	29.11%	Quarterly		227,804		725,641		953,445		322,508		-		-		322,508
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Standard Bank	Argentina	Ar$	23.03%	23.92%	Quarterly		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
91.081.000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	B.N.P. Paribas	USA	US$	6.32%	5.98%	Semi-annually		-		883,679		883,679		858,299		-		-		858,299
91.081.000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	Banco Santander C.H. SA Chile	USA	US$	1.69%	1.01%	At maturity		-		17,296,605		17,296,605		-		-		-		-
91.081.000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	97.004.000-5	Banco Santander Chile (Linea Crédito)	Chile	Ch$	6.00%	6.00%	At maturity		-		176		176		-		-		-		-
91.081.000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	Export Development Corpotation Loan	USA	US$	1.57%	1.40%	Semi-annually		380,556		375,606		756,162		-		-		-		-
91.081.000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd.	USA	US$	1.68%	1.00%	At maturity		-		17,296,605		17,296,605		-		-		-		-
91.081.000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	Scotiabank & Trust Cayman Ltd	Cayman Islands	US$	1.68%	1.00%	At maturity		23,316		26,206,977		26,230,293		-		-		-		-
91.081.000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	Bank Of America	USA	US$	1.66%	1.03%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
91.081.000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	Mercantil Commercebank	USA	US$	1.68%	1.00%	At maturity		-		10,482,791		10,482,791		-		-		-		-
91.081.000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	97.030.000-7	Banco del Estado de Chile	Chile	US$	1.69%	1.01%	At maturity		-		33,544,931		33,544,931		-		-		-		-
91.081.000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A.NY	USA	US$	1.72%	1.12%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
91.081.000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	Banco Español de crédito S.A. N.Y.B.	USA	US$	1.72%	1.12%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
91.081.000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	Caja Madrid, Caja Madrid Miami Agency	USA	US$	1.83%	1.83%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Argentina S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Citibank	Argentina	Ar$	21.50%	21.50%	At maturity		798,209		-		798,209		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Ciudad	Argentina	Ar$	25.59%	23.00%	At maturity		99,258		-		99,258		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Galicia	Argentina	Ar$	32.54%	28.50%	At maturity		2,530,765		-		2,530,765		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Itau	Argentina	Ar$	35.15%	30.50%	At maturity		1,075,305		-		1,075,305		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Macro	Argentina	Ar$	14.00%	16.00%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Nación Argentina	Argentina	Ar$	20.57%	18.85%	At maturity		531,359		-		531,359		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Provincia de Buenos Aires	Argentina	Ar$	20.20%	18.09%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Santander Río	Argentina	Ar$	34.49%	30.00%	At maturity		658,713		-		658,713		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Standard Bank	Argentina	Ar$	30.61%	27.00%	At maturity		1,154,665		-		1,154,665		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Supervielle	Argentina	Ar$	31.89%	28.00%	At maturity		1,031,807		-		1,031,807		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Citibank	Argentina	Ar$	39.84%	34.00%	At maturity		3,450,479		-		3,450,479		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Credit Suisse International	Argentina	US$	13.67%	13.25%	Quarterly		3,155,920		-		3,155,920		-		-		-		-
94.271.00-3	Enersis S.A.	Chile	97.004.000-5	Banco Santander Chile	Chile	Ch$	5.00%	5.00%	At maturity		1,519		-		1,519		-		-		-		-
79.913.810-7	Inmobiliaria Manso de Velasco Ltda.	Chile	97.004.000-5	Banco Santander Chile	Argentina	Ch$	6.00%	6.00%	Monthly		4		-		4		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Ciudad -Syndicated II	Argentina	Ar$	26.62%	23.84%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Galicia - Syndicated II	Argentina	Ar$	26.62%	23.84%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Galicia - Syndicated III	Argentina	Ar$	26.44%	23.69%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Hipotecario	Argentina	Ar$	26.68%	23.89%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Hipotecario - Syndicated II	Argentina	Ar$	26.96%	24.11%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Itau	Argentina	US$	8.24%	7.99%	Quarterly		817,499		1,213,314		2,030,813		404,438		-		-		404,438
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Itau - Syndicated II	Argentina	Ar$	26.62%	23.84%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Itau - Syndicated III	Argentina	Ar$	26.44%	23.69%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Macro	Argentina	Ar$	30.42%	27.75%	Semi-annually		1,651,420		-		1,651,420		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Santander - Syndicated III	Argentina	Ar$	26.44%	23.69%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Santander Río	Argentina	Ar$	25.59%	23.00%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Santander -Syndicated II	Argentina	Ar$	26.62%	23.84%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Deutsche Bank	Argentina	US$	8.24%	7.99%	Quarterly		1,634,992		2,426,628		4,061,620		808,876		-		-		808,876
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Standard Bank	Argentina	US$	8.24%	7.99%	Quarterly		817,499		1,213,314		2,030,813		404,438		-		-		404,438
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Standard Bank - Syndicated III	Argentina	Ar$	26.44%	23.69%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Standard Bank -Syndicated II	Argentina	Ar$	26.62%	23.84%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Standard Bank	Argentina	Ar$	25.59%	23.00%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Itau	Argentina	Ar$	33.70%	29.25%	At maturity		161,254		-		161,254		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Macro I	Argentina	Ar$	21.94%	20.00%	At maturity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Hipotecario - Syndicated I	Argentina	Ar$	25.42%	23.31%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-	��	-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Itau- Syndicated I	Argentina	Ar$	25.42%	23.31%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Santander - Syndicated I	Argentina	Ar$	25.42%	23.31%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Standard Bank - Syndicated I	Argentina	Ar$	25.42%	23.31%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Galicia - Syndicated I	Argentina	Ar$	25.42%	23.31%	Semi-annually		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Santander - Syndicated IV	Argentina	Ar$	33.84%	30.22%	Semi-annually		100,275		498,659		598,934		2,050,042		-		-		2,050,042
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Itau- Syndicated IV	Argentina	Ar$	33.84%	30.22%	Semi-annually		91,555		455,297		546,852		1,871,777		-		-		1,871,777
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Galicia - Syndicated IV	Argentina	Ar$	33.84%	30.22%	Semi-annually		87,195		433,616		520,811		1,782,645		-		-		1,782,645
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Hipotecario - Syndicated IV	Argentina	Ar$	33.84%	30.22%	Semi-annually		30,519		151,766		182,285		623,926		-		-		623,926
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Banco Ciudad -Syndicated IV	Argentina	Ar$	33.84%	30.22%	Semi-annually		13,080		65,042		78,122		267,397		-		-		267,397
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Argentina	Argentina	Ar$	33.84%	30.22%	Quarterly		113,354		563,701		677,055		2,317,438		-		-		2,317,438
							Total				24,049,924		130,867,848		154,917,772		51,445,575		74,847,155		93,671,238		219,963,968

December 31, 2012															January 1, 2012
Current ThCh$							Non-current ThCh$								Current ThCh$						Non-current ThCh$
Less than 90 days			More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current		Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		2,211,773		12,517,876		14,729,649		-		-		-		-
	142,971			23,365,571		23,508,542		-		-		-		-		275,812		-		275,812		27,817,501		-		-		27,817,501
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		176,118		20,863,126		21,039,244		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		1,694		1,856,820		1,858,514		-		-		-		-
	4,858,791			-		4,858,791		-		-		-		-		6,481,458		7,048,955		13,530,413		5,563,500		-		-		5,563,500
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		26,242		1,479,891		1,506,133		-		-		-		-
	-			2,385,144		2,385,144		5,314,352		6,132,262		-		11,446,614		-		2,426,516		2,426,516		5,406,532		6,238,628		3,470,634		15,115,794
	-			3,755,999		3,755,999		8,336,860		-		-		8,336,860		-		3,399,025		3,399,025		8,502,839		4,712,630		-		13,215,469
	-			58,106		58,106		-		1,491,152		1,851,177		3,342,329		-		-		-		-		770,778		2,881,965		3,652,743
	46			-		46		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		3,068		1,541,618		1,544,686		-		-		-		-
	62,786			444,835		507,621		1,186,227		1,186,227		12,010,552		14,383,006		71,315		-		71,315		1,127,370		1,288,422		13,689,484		16,105,276
	18,702			-		18,702		2,391,588		2,391,588		-		4,783,176		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		55,688,134		55,688,134		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		7,055,183		22,122,184		-		29,177,367		-		-		-		1,298,813		17,923,617		12,468,603		31,691,033
	1,725,270			-		1,725,270		-		-		-		-		-		1,870,716		1,870,716		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		392,849		1,357,201		1,750,050		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		1,890,464		5,610,961		7,501,425		1,870,361		-		-		1,870,361
	162,350			-		162,350		-		7,846,933		-		7,846,933		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		8,977,569		8,977,569		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		26,730,428		26,730,428		-		-		-		-
	383,776			-		383,776		-		18,549,169		-		18,549,169		-		21,177,566		21,177,566		-		-		-		-
	126,712			-		126,712		-		6,124,429		-		6,124,429		-		6,430,876		6,430,876		-		-		-		-
	1,037,293			-		1,037,293		-		50,135,818		-		50,135,818		-		23,478,356		23,478,356		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	20,323			-		20,323		-		-		2,813,632		2,813,632		18,741		-		18,741		-		-		2,890,532		2,890,532
	20,323			-		20,323		-		-		2,813,632		2,813,632		18,741		-		18,741		-		-		2,890,532		2,890,532
	10,049			-		10,049		-		-		2,438,481		2,438,481		8,847		-		8,847		-		-		2,505,128		2,505,128
	8,129			-		8,129		-		-		1,125,453		1,125,453		7,497		-		7,497		-		-		1,156,213		1,156,213
	33,872			-		33,872		-		-		4,689,387		4,689,387		31,235		-		31,235		-		-		4,817,554		4,817,554
	20,323			-		20,323		-		-		2,813,632		2,813,632		18,741		-		18,741		-		-		2,890,532		2,890,532
	25,904			-		25,904		-		1,875,756		-		1,875,756		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-	��		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		132,120		-		132,120		-		-		7,708,094		7,708,094
	48,316			-		48,316		-		-		3,939,085		3,939,085		44,826		-		44,826		-		-		4,046,745		4,046,745
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		26,612		-		26,612		-		-		1,927,022		1,927,022
	115,527			6,817,284		6,932,811		-		-		-		-		186,005		-		186,005		8,449,285		-		-		8,449,285
	486,949			-		486,949		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	779,545			-		779,545		-		-		-		-		1,260,656		2,414,082		3,674,738		-		-		-		-
	26,215			2,434,744		2,460,959		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		3,017,603		-		-		3,017,603
	1,969,227			-		1,969,227		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		2,414,082		-		-		2,414,082
	9,926			973,898		983,824		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		1,207,041		-		-		1,207,041
	206,886			-		206,886		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	57,965			1,460,847		1,518,812		973,898		-		-		973,898		4,834,533		-		4,834,533		2,414,082		-		-		2,414,082
	4,486,547			-		4,486,547		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		4,224,644		-		-		4,224,644
	46,375			1,168,677		1,215,052		779,118		-		-		779,118		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	22,135			584,340		606,475		389,560		-		-		389,560		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	78,860			-		78,860		-		-		-		-		852,036		-		852,036		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		42,370		2,414,082		2,456,452		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		617,884		-		617,884		-		-		-		-
	1,447,627			-		1,447,627		-		-		-		-		282,930		1,750,209		2,033,139		-		-		-		-
	6,719			1,409,376		1,416,095		-		-		-		-		311,088		1,810,562		2,121,650		-		-		-		-
	233,554			-		233,554		-		-		-		-		1,192,058		-		1,192,058		-		-		-		-
	297,709			876,508		1,174,217		292,169		-		-		292,169		-		-		-		3,621,124		-		-		3,621,124
	297,709			876,507		1,174,216		292,169		-		-		292,169		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			820,076		820,076		1,570,498		-		-		1,570,498		50,233		849,448		899,681		1,698,896		849,449		-		2,548,345
	-			-		-		15,792,106		-		-		15,792,106		-		-		-		17,055,976		-		-		17,055,976
	277			-		277		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	354,739			343,643		698,382		687,160		-		-		687,160		-		758,262		758,262		1,486,682		-		-		1,486,682
	-			-		-		15,792,106		-		-		15,792,106		-		-		-		17,055,976		-		-		17,055,976
	-			28,264		28,264		23,927,433		-		-		23,927,433		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		11,963,716		-		-		11,963,716		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		9,570,973		-		-		9,570,973		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		18,663,398		-		-		18,663,398		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		34,267		-		34,267		30,494,018		-		-		30,494,018
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		12,921,194		-		-		12,921,194
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		26,312,836		-		-		26,312,836
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	395,963			-		395,963		-		-		-		-		978,500		-		978,500		-		-		-		-
	3,395,077			-		3,395,077		-		-		-		-		5,167,489		-		5,167,489		-		-		-		-
	1,341,282			-		1,341,282		-		-		-		-		3,529,419		-		3,529,419		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		368,142		-		368,142		-		-		-		-
	659,346			1,881,095		2,540,441		402,562		-		-		402,562		3,555,128		-		3,555,128		-		-		-		-
	209,414			-		209,414		-		-		-		-		368,366		-		368,366		-		-		-		-
	878,233			-		878,233		-		-		-		-		1,898,686		-		1,898,686		-		-		-		-
	1,390,448			-		1,390,448		-		-		-		-		2,509,954		-		2,509,954		-		-		-		-
	1,239,740			-		1,239,740		-		-		-		-		2,566,218		-		2,566,218		-		-		-		-
	4,347,020			-		4,347,020		-		-		-		-		6,393,434		-		6,393,434		-		-		-		-
	5,696,590			-		5,696,590		-		-		-		-		44,820		-		44,820		5,195,104		-		-		5,195,104
	109			-		109		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	159,475			261,271		420,746		132,576		-		-		132,576		53,063		318,657		371,720		487,596		-		-		487,596
	199,084			326,151		525,235		165,510		-		-		165,510		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	555,645			486,949		1,042,594		1,460,847		-		-		1,460,847		167,311		398,233		565,544		3,023,612		603,521		-		3,627,133
	339,482			324,633		664,115		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	199,084			326,151		525,235		165,510		-		-		165,510		66,315		398,233		464,548		609,361		-		-		609,361
	379,564			1,105,298		1,484,862		1,842,165		-		-		1,842,165		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	248,855			407,689		656,544		206,887		-		-		206,887		82,953		497,792		580,745		761,701		-		-		761,701
	555,645			486,949		1,042,594		1,460,847		-		-		1,460,847		100,996		-		100,996		2,414,203		603,521		-		3,017,724
	29,777			1,947,796		1,977,573		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	555,645			486,949		1,042,594		1,460,847		-		-		1,460,847		100,996		-		100,996		2,414,203		603,521		-		3,017,724
	98,269			-		98,269		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	398,343			652,590		1,050,933		331,165		-		-		331,165		132,688		796,817		929,505		1,219,258		-		-		1,219,258
	759,134			2,210,596		2,969,730		3,684,336		-		-		3,684,336		40,734		3,197,006		3,237,740		6,393,999		799,242		-		7,193,241
	379,564			1,105,298		1,484,862		1,842,165		-		-		1,842,165		40,677		3,196,970		3,237,647		6,393,999		799,242		-		7,193,241
	555,645			486,949		1,042,594		1,460,847		-		-		1,460,847		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	547,656			897,204		1,444,860		455,294		-		-		455,294		283,419		1,095,492		1,378,911		4,090,481		603,521		-		4,694,002
	195,452			-		195,452		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	293,468			-		293,468		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		16,968		1,013,914		1,030,882		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		25,858		1,545,012		1,570,870		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		25,859		1,545,012		1,570,871		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		20,196		1,207,041		1,227,237		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		8,077		482,816		490,893		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	45,633,436			61,197,387		106,830,823		140,050,072		117,855,518		34,495,031		292,400,621		50,048,479		228,145,273		278,193,752		216,963,871		35,796,092		63,343,038		316,103,001

Appendix No. 4, letter a), presents details of estimated future cash flows (undiscounted) that the Group will have to disburse to settle the bank loans detailed above.

F-84

19.2    Unsecured Liabilities

The detail of Unsecured Liabilities by currency and maturity as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 is as follows:

      - Summary of unsecured liabilities by currency and maturity

Country	Currency	Annual   Nominal   Rate	Secured/   Unsecured	Current						Non-current
				Maturity				Total current at 12/31/2013		Maturity						Total non-     current at     12/31/2013
				One to three months		Three to twelve months				One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years
				ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Chile	US$	7.62%	Unsecured		208,555,534		810,389		209,365,923		238,986,425		-		159,538,410	398,524,835
Chile	U.F.	5.57%	Unsecured		-		9,072,702		9,072,702		9,696,776		9,696,776		299,711,440	319,104,992
Peru	US$	6.89%	Unsecured		862,593		5,164,073		6,026,666		13,835,937		5,249,833		14,786,682	33,872,452
Peru	Sol	6.63%	Unsecured		7,549,494		34,181,671		41,731,165		41,343,147		9,391,473		98,704,389	149,439,009
Colombia	CP	7.54%	Unsecured		108,852,499		26,251,335		135,103,834		107,653,041		261,155,251		645,988,991	1,014,797,283
Brazil	Real	11.06%	Unsecured		-		6,112,517		6,112,517		99,686,584		140,090,064		24,257,703	264,034,351
			Total		325,820,120		81,592,687		407,412,807		511,201,910		425,583,397		1,242,987,615	2,179,772,922

Country	Currency	Annual   Nominal   Rate	Secured/   Unsecured	Current						Non-current
				Maturity				Total current at 12/31/2012		Maturity						Total non-     current at     12/31/2012
				One to three months		Three to twelve months				One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years
				ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Chile	US$	7.71%	Unsecured		20,743,334		192,725,416		213,468,750		271,467,420		123,377,492		145,304,618	540,149,530
Chile	U.F.	5.57%	Unsecured		-		8,778,822		8,778,822		14,445,679		15,349,506		289,721,460	319,516,645
Peru	US$	6.89%	Unsecured		785,915		55,795		841,710		7,688,954		9,566,350		18,255,463	35,510,767
Peru	Sol	6.73%	Unsecured		6,771,045		37,313,862		44,084,907		63,550,103		25,360,206		52,521,139	141,431,448
Colombia	CP	8.01%	Unsecured		50,177,769		43,631,713		93,809,482		172,916,738		191,051,473		498,675,237	862,643,448
Brazil	Real	11.58%	Unsecured		6,626,846		26,779,439		33,406,285		64,628,349		152,851,186		87,976,925	305,456,460
			Total		85,104,909		309,285,047		394,389,956		594,697,243		517,556,213		1,092,454,842	2,204,708,298

Country	Currency	Annual   Nominal   Rate	Secured/   Unsecured	Current						Non-current
				Maturity				Total current at 1/1//2012		Maturity						Total non-     current at     01/01/2012
				One to three months		Three to twelve months				One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years
				ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Chile	US$	8.10%	Unsecured		22,439,241		802,032		23,241,273		396,001,073		236,020,317		157,801,599	789,822,989
Chile	CH$	5.29%	Unsecured		31,548,592		9,198,469		40,747,061		13,764,742		14,617,263		378,064,242	406,446,247
Peru	US$	6.97%	Unsecured		853,625		60,597		914,222		5,049,784		13,692,084		19,828,195	38,570,063
Peru	Sol	7.37%	Unsecured		27,920,075		57,158		27,977,233		80,986,235		42,415,673		28,905,326	152,307,234
Argentina	Ar$	12.28%	Unsecured		15,571		3,963,560		3,979,131		-		-		-	-
Colombia	CP	12.64%	Unsecured		1,753,145		36,094,355		37,847,500		131,329,301		76,673,844		574,038,462	782,041,607
Brazil	Real	12.97%	Unsecured		6,688,369		101,390,968		108,079,337		60,242,802		120,351,829		90,131,132	270,725,763
			Total		91,218,618		151,567,139		242,785,757		687,373,937		503,771,010		1,248,768,956	2,439,913,903

F-85

19.3    Secured Obligations

The detail of Secured Liabilities by currency and maturity as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 is as follows:

      - Summary of Secured Obligations by currency and maturity

Country	Currency	Annual   Nominal   Rate	Secured/   Unsecured	Current						Non-current
				Maturity				Total current at 12/31/2013		Maturity						Total non- current at 12/31/2013		Fair Value
				One to three months		Three to twelve months				One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years
				ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Peru	Sol	6.16%	Secured		4,828,233		-		4,828,233		-		-		-		-	-
			Total		4,828,233		-		4,828,233		-		-		-		-	-
Country	Currency	Annual   Nominal   Rate	Secured/   Unsecured	Current						Non-current
				Maturity				Total current at 12/31/2012		Maturity						Total non- current at 12/31/2012		Fair Value
				One to three months		Three to twelve months				One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years
				ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Peru	Sol	6.41%	Secured		132,316		4,748,371		4,880,687		4,689,387		-		-		4,689,387	-
			Total		132,316		4,748,371		4,880,687		4,689,387		-		-		4,689,387	-
Country	Currency	Annual   Nominal   Rate	Secured/   Unsecured	Current						Non-current
				Maturity				Total current at 1/1//2012		Maturity						Total non- current at 01/01/2012		Fair Value
				One to three months		Three to twelve months				One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years
				ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Peru	US$	6.15%	Secured		-		10,463,994		10,463,994		-		-		-		-	-
Peru	Sol	6.41%	Secured		135,886		60,596		196,482		9,635,108		-		-		9,635,108	-
			Total		135,886		10,524,590		10,660,476		9,635,108		-		-		9,635,108	-

The fair value of current and non-current secured and unsecured liabilities as of December 31, 2013 totaled ThCh$3,006,275,851 (ThCh$2,886,287,734 and ThCh$3,209,731,363 as of December 31. 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively.

F-86

- Secured and Unsecured Liabilities by Company

Taxpayer ID   No. (RUT)	Company	Country	ID No. Financial Institution	Financial Institution	Country	Currency	Effective  Interest Rate	Nominal  Interest Rate	Secured/  Unsecured	December 31, 2013
										Current ThCh$						Non-current ThCh$
										Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	US$	6.15%	6.06%	Yes		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	6.57%	6.47%	Yes		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	6.25%	6.16%	Yes		4,828,233		-		4,828,233		-		-		-	-
					Total Secured Bonds						4,828,233		-		4,828,233		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Foreign	Bonds, 1st series	Brazil	Real	9.84%	9.93%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Foreign	Bonds, 1st series	Brazil	Real	10.13%	10.17%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Foreign	Bonds, 1st series	Brazil	Real	9.14%	9.21%	No		-		108,915		108,915		25,371,905		-		-	25,371,905
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Foreign	Bonds, 2nd series	Brazil	Real	15.22%	15.91%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Foreign	Bonds, 2nd series	Brazil	Real	13.84%	14.12%	No		-		1,996,222		1,996,222		15,535,408		31,070,822		-	46,606,230
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Foreign	Bonds, 1st series	Brazil	Real	8.96%	9.01%	No		-		91,511		91,511		11,124,275		11,124,275		-	22,248,550
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Foreign	Bonds, 2nd series	Brazil	Real	11.88%	12.11%	No		-		2,376,949		2,376,949		-		48,281,610		24,257,703	72,539,313
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	Foreign	B102	Colombia	CP	7.69%	7.48%	No		353,344		-		353,344		-		106,178,766		-	106,178,766
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	Foreign	B103	Colombia	CP	7.95%	7.72%	No		90,271		-		90,271		-		-		21,761,387	21,761,387
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	Foreign	B304	Colombia	CP	5.83%	5.71%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	Foreign	B502	Colombia	CP	6.81%	6.93%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	Foreign	B503	Colombia	CP	6.85%	6.68%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	Foreign	B503	Colombia	CP	8.40%	8.14%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	Foreign	B604	Colombia	CP	6.28%	6.14%	No		273,780		-		273,780		39,442,515		-		-	39,442,515
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	Foreign	B8	Colombia	CP	8.75%	8.48%	No		68,315,341		-		68,315,341		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	Foreign	B5-13 bonds	Colombia	CP	5.75%	5.63%	No		358,244		-		358,244		-		49,414,670		-	49,414,670
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	Foreign	Bonds - 13	Colombia	CP	6.64%	6.49%	No		439,500		-		439,500		-		-		52,591,832	52,591,832
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Itaú 1	Brazil	Real	8.90%	8.96%	No		-		493,794		493,794		22,830,506		-		-	22,830,506
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Itaú 2	Brazil	Real	12.69%	12.94%	No		-		1,045,126		1,045,126		24,824,490		49,613,357		-	74,437,847
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Itaú 2	Brazil	Real	14.89%	15.08%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	Sol	6.06%	5.97%	No		-		79,078		79,078		-		-		9,391,474	9,391,474
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	FCR - Macrofondo	Peru	Sol	5.56%	5.49%	No		184,291		-		184,291		-		-		9,391,474	9,391,474
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Interseguro Cia de Seguros	Peru	Sol	6.28%	6.19%	No		-		100,939		100,939		-		-		7,513,179	7,513,179
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Horizonte	Peru	Sol	6.06%	5.97%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Horizonte	Peru	Sol	6.56%	6.46%	No		-		5,583,707		5,583,707		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Horizonte	Peru	Sol	7.22%	7.09%	No		67,795		-		67,795		2,817,442		-		-	2,817,442
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Integra	Peru	Sol	5.91%	5.82%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Integra	Peru	Sol	6.50%	6.40%	No		-		9,773,549		9,773,549		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Integra	Peru	Sol	8.00%	7.85%	No		169,163		-		169,163		5,108,962		-		-	5,108,962
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Integra	Peru	Sol	8.16%	8.00%	No		134,049		-		134,049		3,380,931		-		-	3,380,931
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Integra	Peru	Sol	5.91%	5.82%	No		-		43,758		43,758		3,756,589		-		-	3,756,589
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Prima	Peru	Sol	6.63%	6.52%	No		-		41,479		41,479		3,756,589		-		-	3,756,589
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Prima	Peru	Sol	6.81%	6.70%	No		-		4,710,843		4,710,843		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Prima	Peru	Sol	6.84%	6.73%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Prima	Peru	Sol	6.94%	6.82%	No		175,190		-		175,190		7,513,179		-		-	7,513,179
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Prima	Peru	Sol	7.13%	7.00%	No		-		15,799		15,799		4,695,737		-		-	4,695,737
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Prima	Peru	Sol	7.44%	7.30%	No		167,638		-		167,638		-		-		5,634,884	5,634,884
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Profuturo	Peru	Sol	5.77%	5.69%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Profuturo	Peru	Sol	6.67%	6.56%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Profuturo	Peru	Sol	7.56%	7.42%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Profuturo	Peru	Sol	7.72%	7.58%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Profuturo	Peru	Sol	7.91%	7.76%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Profuturo	Peru	Sol	7.97%	7.81%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Profuturo	Peru	Sol	8.06%	7.91%	No		112,121		-		112,121		4,678,832		-		-	4,678,832
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	AFP Profuturo	Peru	Sol	8.31%	8.15%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	FCR - Macrofondo	Peru	Sol	9.92%	6.50%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	FCR - Macrofondo	Peru	Sol	6.66%	6.55%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	FCR - Macrofondo	Peru	Sol	7.03%	6.91%	No		121,796		-		121,796		-		-		3,756,589	3,756,589
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Retirement Fund forNon-commissioned Officers and Specialists- Fosersoe	Peru	Sol	8.75%	8.57%	No		-		27,392		27,392		5,634,886		-		-	5,634,886
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Mapfre Perú Cia de Seguros	Peru	Sol	6.28%	6.19%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	Sol	5.44%	5.37%	No		-		4,950,531		4,950,531		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	Sol	6.50%	6.40%	No		-		4,908,517		4,908,517		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	Sol	6.50%	6.40%	No		-		39,340		39,340		-		3,756,589		-	3,756,589
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	Sol	7.06%	6.94%	No		-		82,909		82,909		-		5,634,884		-	5,634,884
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	Sol	5.00%	4.94%	No		-		59,831		59,831		-		-		7,513,179	7,513,179
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	Sol	5.13%	5.06%	No		207,232		-		207,232		-		-		9,391,474	9,391,474
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Seguro Social de Salud - Essalud	Peru	Sol	7.84%	7.70%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	Sol	6.75%	6.64%	No		223,634		-		223,634		-		-		9,391,474	9,391,474
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	Sol	7.28%	7.15%	No		171,277		-		171,277		-		-		6,667,946	6,667,946
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	Sol	6.50%	6.40%	No		67,827		-		67,827		-		-		9,391,474	9,391,474
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	Sol	7.38%	7.24%	No		92,349		-		92,349		-		-		11,269,768	11,269,768
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	oeds7	Argentina	Ar$	12.28%	11.75%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
94,271,00-3	Enersis S.A.	Chile	97,004,000-5	UF 269 bonds	Chile	U.F.	7.02%	5.75%	No		-		2,799,311		2,799,311		-		-		25,120,127	25,120,127
94,271,00-3	Enersis S.A.	Chile	Foreign	Yankee bonds 2014	USA	US$	7.69%	7.38%	No		-		199,389,819		199,389,819		-		-		-	-
94,271,00-3	Enersis S.A.	Chile	Foreign	Yankee bonds 2016	USA	US$	7.76%	7.40%	No		-		807,913		807,913		134,528,116		-		-	134,528,116
94,271,00-3	Enersis S.A.	Chile	Foreign	Yankee bonds 2026	USA	US$	7.76%	6.60%	No		-		2,476		2,476		-		-		450,115	450,115
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	US$	6.57%	6.47%	No		143,386		-		143,386		-		5,249,833		-	5,249,833
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	6.41%	6.31%	No		-		7,410		7,410		-		-		4,695,737	4,695,737
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	6.38%	6.28%	No		145,018		-		145,018		-		-		4,695,737	4,695,737
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	6.86%	6.75%	No		84,523		3,756,589		3,841,112		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	6.61%	6.50%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	6.54%	6.44%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	6.74%	6.63%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	Sol	6.70%	6.59%	No		5,425,591		-		5,425,591		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	US$	6.44%	6.34%	No		143,391		-		143,391		-		-		5,249,834	5,249,834
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	US$	9.20%	9.00%	No		-		5,164,073		5,164,073		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	US$	7.93%	7.78%	No		148,259		-		148,259		-		-		4,287,014	4,287,014
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Continental	Peru	US$	7.25%	7.13%	No		105,649		-		105,649		3,336,269		-		-	3,336,269
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	US$	6.74%	6.63%	No		159,409		-		159,409		5,249,834		-		-	5,249,834
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	US$	6.09%	6.00%	No		86,622		-		86,622		5,249,834		-		-	5,249,834
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Foreign	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	US$	5.87%	5.78%	No		75,877		-		75,877		-		-		5,249,834	5,249,834
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	A-10 bonds	Colombia	CP	6.89%	6.72%	No		410,041		-		410,041		57,333,471		-		-	57,333,471
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	A102 bonds	Colombia	CP	6.89%	6.72%	No		78,103		-		78,103		10,877,055		-		-	10,877,055
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	B-103 bonds	Colombia	CP	7.00%	7.00%	No		2,793,820		-		2,793,820		-		46,227,482		-	46,227,482
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	A5 bonds	Colombia	CP	5.54%	5.43%	No		13,546,078		-		13,546,078		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	B10 bonds	Colombia	CP	7.64%	7.43%	No		452,160		-		452,160		-		-		43,524,534	43,524,534
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	B15 bonds	Colombia	CP	7.96%	7.73%	No		163,078		-		163,078		-		-		15,091,913	15,091,913
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	E5-09 bonds	Colombia	CP	9.27%	9.27%	No		-		26,251,335		26,251,335		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	B09-09 bonds	Colombia	CP	7.76%	7.55%	No		1,116,939		-		1,116,939		-		59,334,333		-	59,334,333
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	B12 bonds	Colombia	CP	7.97%	7.74%	No		470,239		-		470,239		-		-		24,359,164	24,359,164
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	Foreign bonds	Colombia	CP	10.17%	10.17%	No		2,327,070		-		2,327,070		-		-		24,481,561	24,481,561
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	Quimbo bonds	Colombia	CP	10.17%	10.17%	No		16,722,841		-		16,722,841		-		-		174,754,259	174,754,259
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	Quimbo B10 bonds	Colombia	CP	5.34%	5.24%	No		222,497		-		222,497		-		-		81,524,318	81,524,318
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	Quimbo B15 bonds	Colombia	CP	5.46%	5.36%	No		151,650		-		151,650		-		-		54,347,606	54,347,606
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	Quimbo B12-13 bonds	Colombia	CP	6.85%	6.68%	No		379,429		-		379,429		-		-		98,661,277	98,661,277
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	Quimbo B6-13 bonds	Colombia	CP	6.08%	5.95%	No		142,037		-		142,037		-		-		41,454,410	41,454,410
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign	B6-13 bonds	Colombia	CP	6.08%	5.95%	No		46,037		-		46,037		-		-		13,436,730	13,436,730
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	97,004,000-5	Banco Santander Chile - 317 Series-H	Chile	U.F.	7.17%	6.20%	No		-		5,792,134		5,792,134		9,696,776		9,696,776		45,132,233	64,525,785
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	97,004,000-5	Banco Santander Chile - 522 Series-M	Chile	U.F.	4.82%	4.75%	No		-		481,257		481,257		-		-		229,459,080	229,459,080
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	The Bank of New York Mellon -144 - A	USA	US$	8.50%	8.35%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	The Bank of New York Mellon -144 - A	USA	US$	8.83%	8.63%	No		3,770,634		-		3,770,634		104,458,309		-		-	104,458,309
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	The Bank of New York Mellon - First issue S-1	USA	US$	7.96%	7.88%	No		3,543,987		-		3,543,987		-		-		106,741,471	106,741,471
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	The Bank of New York Mellon - First issue S-2	USA	US$	7.40%	7.33%	No		1,133,296		-		1,133,296		-		-		36,596,392	36,596,392
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Foreign	The Bank of New York Mellon - First issue S-3	USA	US$	8.26%	8.13%	No		717,798		-		717,798		-		-		15,750,432	15,750,432
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	97,004,000-5	Banco Santander Chile - 264 Series-F	Chile	U.F.	6.44%	6.44%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	97,004,000-5	Banco Santander Chile - 318 Series-K	Chile	U.F.	3.86%	3.86%	No		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
					Total Unsecured Bonds						126,430,301		280,982,506		407,412,807		511,201,910		425,583,397		#########	2,179,772,922

December 31, 2012																January 1, 2012
Current ThCh$						Non-current ThCh$										Current ThCh$				Non-current ThCh$
Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current		Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		10,463,994		10,463,994		-		-		-	-
	-		4,748,371		4,748,371		-		-		-		-		-		60,596		60,596		4,817,554		-		-	4,817,554
	132,316		-		132,316		4,689,387		-		-		4,689,387		135,886		-		135,886		4,817,554		-		-	4,817,554
	132,316		4,748,371		4,880,687		4,689,387		-		-		4,689,387		135,886		10,524,590		10,660,476		9,635,108		-		-	9,635,108
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		160,282		32,081,924		32,242,206		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		2,610,374		51,462,513		54,072,887		-		-		-	-
	76,686		-		76,686		13,171,955		13,668,859		-		26,840,814		147,518		-		147,518		27,931,549		14,103,489		-	42,035,038
	106,982		12,242,812		12,349,794		25,009,851		-		-		25,009,851		164,014		-		164,014		-		32,546,476		-	32,546,476
	1,937,059		-		1,937,059		-		30,829,074		15,414,538		46,243,612		1,941,239		-		1,941,239		-		17,199,885		34,700,328	51,900,213
	64,054		-		64,054		-		23,365,572		-		23,365,572		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	2,306,749		-		2,306,749		-		23,717,567		47,973,552		71,691,119		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	402,540		-		402,540		-		105,685,080		-		105,685,080		456,111		-		456,111		-		-		104,210,669	104,210,669
	102,531		-		102,531		-		-		21,680,354		21,680,354		181,497		-		181,497		-		-		21,397,849	21,397,849
	21,832,974		-		21,832,974		-		-		-		-		114,096		-		114,096		21,397,849		-		-	21,397,849
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		30,623		9,019,194		9,049,817		-		-		-	-
	98,018		23,170,878		23,268,896		-		-		-		-		115,603		-		115,603		22,868,952		-		-	22,868,952
	101,709		20,460,835		20,562,544		-		-		-		-		91,853		-		91,853		20,194,220		-		-	20,194,220
	321,197		-		321,197		-		39,295,641		-		39,295,641		372,955		-		372,955		-		38,783,602		-	38,783,602
	349,370		-		349,370		67,751,105		-		-		67,751,105		390,407		-		390,407		66,868,280		-		-	66,868,280
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	392,358		-		392,358		12,150,097		12,150,097		-		24,300,194		-		700,207		700,207		-		28,930,201		-	28,930,201
	1,017,294		-		1,017,294		-		49,120,017		24,588,835		73,708,852		-		1,147,175		1,147,175		-		27,571,778		55,430,804	83,002,582
	725,664		14,536,627		15,262,291		14,296,446		-		-		14,296,446		1,664,942		15,999,149		17,664,091		32,311,253		-		-	32,311,253
	-		78,971		78,971		-		-		9,378,774		9,378,774		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	184,042		-		184,042		-		-		9,378,774		9,378,774		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		100,802		100,802		-		-		7,503,020		7,503,020		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		7,930,354		-		7,930,354		-		-		-	-
	-		47,369		47,369		5,528,788		-		-		5,528,788		48,664		-		48,664		5,679,896		-		-	5,679,896
	67,703		-		67,703		-		2,813,632		-		2,813,632		69,553		-		69,553		-		2,890,532		-	2,890,532
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		44,894		-		44,894		-		3,854,043		-	3,854,043
	-		10,259		10,259		9,469,916		-		-		9,469,916		10,266		-		10,266		9,476,559		-		-	9,476,559
	168,935		-		168,935		-		5,102,053		-		5,102,053		173,552		-		173,552		-		5,241,499		-	5,241,499
	133,867		-		133,867		-		3,376,359		-		3,376,359		137,526		-		137,526		-		3,468,639		-	3,468,639
	-		43,699		43,699		3,751,510		-		-		3,751,510		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		41,423		41,423		3,751,510		-		-		3,751,510		42,555		-		42,555		-		3,854,043		-	3,854,043
	15,086		-		15,086		4,689,387		-		-		4,689,387		15,498		-		15,498		4,817,554		-		-	4,817,554
	181,860		5,627,265		5,809,125		-		-		-		-		186,831		-		186,831		5,781,065		-		-	5,781,065
	174,953		-		174,953		7,503,020		-		-		7,503,020		179,735		-		179,735		-		7,708,087		-	7,708,087
	15,778		-		15,778		-		4,689,387		-		4,689,387		16,209		-		16,209		-		4,817,554		-	4,817,554
	167,411		-		167,411		-		-		5,627,265		5,627,265		171,987		-		171,987		-		-		5,781,065	5,781,065
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		3,897,275		-		3,897,275		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		5,894,881		-		5,894,881		-		-		-	-
	-		2,836,092		2,836,092		-		-		-		-		23,074		-		23,074		2,890,532		-		-	2,890,532
	-		5,831,170		5,831,170		-		-		-		-		209,478		-		209,478		5,781,065		-		-	5,781,065
	205,151		5,627,265		5,832,416		-		-		-		-		210,758		-		210,758		5,781,065		-		-	5,781,065
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		5,082,940		-		5,082,940		-		-		-	-
	111,970		-		111,970		4,672,505		-		-		4,672,505		115,030		-		115,030		-		4,800,211		-	4,800,211
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		2,516,119		-		2,516,119		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		4,840		-		4,840		-		-		-	-
	-		2,857,332		2,857,332		-		-		-		-		44,894		-		44,894		2,890,532		-		-	2,890,532
	121,631		-		121,631		-		-		3,751,510		3,751,510		124,955		-		124,955		-		-		3,854,043	3,854,043
	-		27,355		27,355		5,627,265		-		-		5,627,265		28,102		-		28,102		-		5,781,065		-	5,781,065
	79,202		3,751,510		3,830,712		-		-		-		-		81,366		-		81,366		3,854,043		-		-	3,854,043
	-		53,336		53,336		4,753,112		-		-		4,753,112		48,852		-		48,852		4,756,410		-		-	4,756,410
	-		17,985		17,985		4,743,193		-		-		4,743,193		17,997		-		17,997		4,746,484		-		-	4,746,484
	-		39,287		39,287		-		3,751,510		-		3,751,510		40,360		-		40,360		-		-		3,854,043	3,854,043
	-		82,797		82,797		-		5,627,265		-		5,627,265		85,060		-		85,060		-		-		5,781,065	5,781,065
	-		55,231		55,231		-		-		7,503,020		7,503,020		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	28,609		750,302		778,911		-		-		-		-		29,390		-		29,390		770,809		-		-	770,809
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		15,571		3,963,560		3,979,131		-		-		-	-
	-		2,600,112		2,600,112		4,943,927		5,847,754		16,279,903		27,071,584		-		2,409,255		2,409,255		4,490,426		5,342,947		18,824,480	28,657,853
	5,678,277		-		5,678,277		176,552,999		-		-		176,552,999		6,142,514		-		6,142,514		189,274,248		-		-	189,274,248
	-		739,151		739,151		-		123,377,492		-		123,377,492		-		799,582		799,582		-		133,177,054		-	133,177,054
	-		2,265		2,265		-		-		411,806		411,806		-		2,450		2,450		-		-		445,474	445,474
	130,640		-		130,640		-		-		4,783,175		4,783,175		141,895		-		141,895		-		-		5,195,251	5,195,251
	-		7,400		7,400		-		-		4,689,388		4,689,388		-		7,603		7,603		-		-		4,817,555	4,817,555
	144,821		-		144,821		-		-		4,689,388		4,689,388		148,780		-		148,780		-		-		4,817,555	4,817,555
	84,409		-		84,409		3,751,510		-		-		3,751,510		86,706		-		86,706		3,854,084		-		-	3,854,084
	4,775,750		-		4,775,750		-		-		-		-		-		33,597		33,597		4,817,555		-		-	4,817,555
	-		4,722,091		4,722,091		-		-		-		-		-		15,958		15,958		4,817,555		-		-	4,817,555
	-		4,704,921		4,704,921		-		-		-		-		88,723		-		88,723		4,817,555		-		-	4,817,555
	109,867		-		109,867		5,308,387		-		-		5,308,387		112,871		-		112,871		5,453,472		-		-	5,453,472
	130,645		-		130,645		-		-		-		-		141,900		-		141,900		-		-		5,195,251	5,195,251
	-		55,795		55,795		4,649,246		-		4,783,175		9,432,421		-		60,597		60,597		5,049,784		-		-	5,049,784
	135,080		-		135,080		-		-		3,905,938		3,905,938		146,718		-		146,718		-		-		4,242,442	4,242,442
	96,257		-		96,257		3,039,708		-		-		3,039,708		104,550		-		104,550		-		3,301,582		-	3,301,582
	145,239		-		145,239		-		4,783,175		-		4,783,175		157,752		-		157,752		-		5,195,251		-	5,195,251
	78,922		-		78,922		-		4,783,175		-		4,783,175		85,722		-		85,722		-		5,195,251		-	5,195,251
	69,132		-		69,132		-		-		4,783,175		4,783,175		75,088		-		75,088		-		-		5,195,251	5,195,251
	469,671		-		469,671		56,910,929		-		-		56,910,929		-		534,079		534,079		-		-		56,169,355	56,169,355
	89,461		-		89,461		9,864,217		-		-		9,864,217		-		101,729		101,729		-		-		9,747,283	9,747,283
	183,657		-		183,657		-		-		15,040,745		15,040,745		-		3,654,924		3,654,924		-		-		45,470,431	45,470,431
	3,205,705		-		3,205,705		-		46,070,752		-		46,070,752		-		116,036		116,036		-		13,223,871		-	13,223,871
	511,529		-		511,529		-		-		43,376,968		43,376,968		-		575,302		575,302		-		-		42,811,747	42,811,747
	1,261,346		-		1,261,346		-		-		59,133,165		59,133,165		-		205,704		205,704		-		-		14,844,758	14,844,758
	529,504		-		529,504		-		-		24,276,576		24,276,576		-		1,146,419		1,146,419		-		24,666,371		-	24,666,371
	134,607		-		134,607		13,398,459		-		-		13,398,459		-		1,416,305		1,416,305		-		-		58,362,634	58,362,634
	1,161,554		-		1,161,554		24,992,028		-		-		24,992,028		-		592,993		592,993		-		-		23,960,242	23,960,242
	2,318,404		-		2,318,404		-		-		24,390,398		24,390,398		-		2,288,195		2,288,195		-		-		24,072,581	24,072,581
	16,660,570		-		16,660,570		-		-		175,274,820		175,274,820		-		16,443,475		16,443,475		-		-		172,990,913	172,990,913
	264,062		-		264,062		-		-		81,301,327		81,301,327		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	179,360		-		179,360		-		-		54,200,884		54,200,884		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		5,731,907		5,731,907		9,501,752		9,501,752		48,775,725		67,779,229		-		5,653,703		5,653,703		9,274,316		9,274,316		51,798,587	70,347,219
	-		446,803		446,803		-		-		224,665,832		224,665,832		-		436,109		436,109		-		-		218,509,846	218,509,846
	6,679,443		191,984,000		198,663,443		-		-		-		-		7,225,533		-		7,225,533		206,726,825		-		-	206,726,825
	3,449,713		-		3,449,713		94,914,421		-		-		94,914,421		3,731,750		-		3,731,750		-		102,843,263		-	102,843,263
	3,242,355		-		3,242,355		-		-		97,491,553		97,491,553		3,507,440		-		3,507,440		-		-		105,516,202	105,516,202
	1,036,841		-		1,036,841		-		-		33,456,554		33,456,554		1,121,609		-		1,121,609		-		-		36,254,989	36,254,989
	656,705		-		656,705		-		-		13,944,705		13,944,705		710,395		-		710,395		-		-		15,584,934	15,584,934
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		31,548,592		-		31,548,592		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		699,402		699,402		-		-		88,931,329	88,931,329
	85,104,909		309,285,047		394,389,956		594,697,243		517,556,213		1,092,454,842		2,204,708,298		91,218,618		151,567,139		242,785,757		687,373,937		503,771,010		1,248,768,956	2,439,913,903

Appendix No. 4, letter b) presents details of estimated future cash flows (undiscounted) that the Group will have to disburse to settle the secured and unsecured obligations detailed above.

F-87

- Detail of Finance Lease Obligations

Taxpayer ID No. (RUT)	Company	Country	ID No. Financial Institution	Financial Institution	Country	Currency	Nominal Interest Rate	December 31, 2013
								Current						Non-current
								Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A.	Peru	Foreign	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	US$	2.00%		1,347,864		3,986,173		5,334,037		14,566,758		11,515,608		-	26,082,366
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	Banco BBVA Continental	Peru	Sol	6.27%		989,495		1,675,819		2,665,314		490,678		-		-	490,678
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	COMAFI	Argentina	Ar$	25.15%		70,850		100,910		171,760		-		-		-	-
Foreign	EE Piura	Peru	Foreign	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	US$	5.80%		-		4,681,911		4,681,911		12,853,072		9,859,216		21,464,788	44,177,076
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	87,509,100-K	Abengoa Chile	Chile	US$	6.50%		-		1,193,881		1,193,881		2,625,612		2,978,035		10,930,941	16,534,588
			Total Leasing						2,408,209		11,638,694		14,046,903		30,536,120		24,352,859		32,395,729	87,284,708

December 31, 2012														January 1, 2012
Current						Non-current								Current						Non-current
Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current		Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current
	1,231,661		3,610,794		4,842,455		11,478,411		17,127,941		-		28,606,352		1,918,477		6,218,565		8,137,042		10,519,276		14,415,305		11,395,943	36,330,524
	1,191,889		2,701,760		3,893,649		2,178,152		-		-		2,178,152		579,527		3,648,359		4,227,886		2,859,893		-		-	2,859,893
	72,637		390,074		462,711		202,235		-		-		202,235		121,499		280,084		401,583		593,623		-		-	593,623
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		1,025,604		1,025,604		2,255,535		2,558,284		11,405,767		16,219,586		1,041,741		-		1,041,741		2,291,023		2,598,536		13,765,541	18,655,100
	2,496,187		7,728,232		10,224,419		16,114,333		19,686,225		11,405,767		47,206,325		3,661,244		10,147,008		13,808,252		16,263,815		17,013,841		25,161,484	58,439,140

Appendix No. 4 letter c) presents details of estimated future cash flows (undiscounted) that the Group will have to disburse to settle the finance lease obligations detailed above.

- Detail of Other Obligations

Taxpayer ID No. (RUT)	Company	Country	ID No. Financial Institution	Financial Institution	Country	Currency	Nominal Interest Rate	December 31, 2013
								Current						Non-current
								Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current
96,589,170-6	Empresa Eléctrica Pangue	Chile	N/A	Other	Chile	Ch$	N/A		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
91,081,000-6	Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.	Chile	N/A	Other	Chile	Ch$	N/A		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Mitsubishi (secured debt))	Argentina	US$	7.42%		73,993,677		-		73,993,677		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Mitsubishi (unsecured debt)	Argentina	US$	7.42%		22,907,475		-		22,907,475		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Other	Argentina	Ar$	17.29%		3,249,165		2,171,469		5,420,634		1,447,643		-		-	1,447,643
96,827,970-K	Endesa Eco S.A.	Chile	96601250-1	Inversiones Centinela S.A.	Chile	US$	6.10%		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Hidroinvest S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Other	Argentina	US$	2.67%		-		281,066		281,066		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Other	Argentina	Ar$	19.79%		-		-		-		-		975,589		-	975,589
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Foreign	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	US$	0.78%		635		-		635		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Ampla Energía E Servicios S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Eletrobrás	Brazil	Real	6.54%		312,100		932,977		1,245,077		2,458,601		1,950,364		882,077	5,291,042
Foreign	Ampla Energía E Servicios S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Bndes	Brazil	Real	8.57%		3,253,636		14,562,362		17,815,998		46,219,847		41,924,728		29,419,619	117,564,194
96,800,570-7	Chilectra S.A.	Chile	N/A	Other	Chile	Ch$	N/A		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
94,271,000-3	Enersis S.A.	Chile	N/A	Other	Chile	Ch$	N/A		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Dock Sud	Argentina	Foreign	YPF Internacional	Argentina	US$	5.27%		-		39,208,345		39,208,345		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Dock Sud	Argentina	Foreign	YPF Argentina	Argentina	US$	3.27%		-		2,381,532		2,381,532		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Dock Sud	Argentina	Foreign	PAN American Energy	Argentina	US$	3.27%		-		4,786,694		4,786,694		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Dock Sud	Argentina	Foreign	Repsol International Finance	Argentina	US$	3.91%		-		1,551,476		1,551,476		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Banco do Nordeste	Brazil	Real	7.79%		3,443,419		10,247,190		13,690,609		9,450,057		9,450,056		1,181,259	20,081,372
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Eletrobras	Brazil	Real	6.26%		624,659		1,864,973		2,489,632		4,913,450		4,356,883		5,928,801	15,199,134
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Banco do Brasil	Brazil	US$	4.38%		13,448		36,224		49,672		-		-		1,447,118	1,447,118
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Banco do Brasil	Brazil	Real	14.96%		919,318		-		919,318		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	BNDES	Brazil	Real	8.70%		2,894,668		11,535,775		14,430,443		13,367,147		13,367,147		12,776,112	39,510,406
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Faelce	Brazil	Real	13.22%		1,431,918		1,421,258		2,853,176		-		-		-	-
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	BEI	Brazil	US$	5.49%		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
			Total						113,044,118		90,981,341		204,025,459		77,856,745		72,024,767		51,634,986	201,516,498

December 31, 2012														January 1, 2012
Current						Non-current								Current						Non-current
Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current		Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		2		-		2		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		27		-		27		-		-		-	-
	70,025,348		-		70,025,348		-		-		-		-		7,749,998		14,969,290		22,719,288		12,851,153		37,735,332		-	50,586,485
	14,355,259		-		14,355,259		-		-		-		-		-		13,925,511		13,925,511		-		-		-	-
	1,791,317		3,600,814		5,392,131		5,629,544		-		-		5,629,544		679,866		1,133,110		1,812,976		-		-		-	-
	2,022,260		-		2,022,260		-		-		-		-		3,929,271		-		3,929,271		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	172,980		640,394		813,374		2,375,163		2,224,100		1,703,248		6,302,511		205,853		613,419		819,272		2,035,832		2,239,892		2,816,907	7,092,631
	3,218,667		9,027,835		12,246,502		23,271,708		22,831,600		12,665,160		58,768,468		4,941,520		10,526,077		15,467,597		23,343,601		22,203,629		22,367,250	67,914,480
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		1,235		1,235		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		3,958		3,958		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
	1,524,427		6,381,892		7,906,319		19,261,134		9,944,359		6,165,602		35,371,095		1,975,303		6,454,541		8,429,844		24,074,744		5,911,192		6,650,091	36,636,027
	867,551		2,252,314		3,119,865		5,005,894		4,687,321		7,797,798		17,491,013		1,289,715		3,067,631		4,357,346		6,534,103		5,634,274		11,052,898	23,221,275
	13,741		66,375		80,116		33,187		-		1,325,728		1,358,915		16,411		113,158		129,569		108,803		-		1,448,799	1,557,602
	977,200		2,940,005		3,917,205		910,845		-		-		910,845		1,049,301		3,073,192		4,122,493		5,366,340		-		-	5,366,340
	3,493,261		8,605,380		12,098,641		11,473,840		-		-		11,473,840		5,567,428		16,072,830		21,640,258		27,967,533		-		-	27,967,533
	-		2,826,796		2,826,796		1,413,400		-		-		1,413,400		-		3,176,291		3,176,291		4,764,438		-		-	4,764,438
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		4,532,108		4,532,108		-		-		-	-
	98,462,011		36,341,805		134,803,816		69,374,715		39,687,380		29,657,536		138,719,631		27,404,695		77,662,351		105,067,046		107,046,547		73,724,319		44,335,945	225,106,811

Appendix No. 4 letter d) presents details of estimated future cash flows (undiscounted) that the Group will have to disburse to settle these Other Obligations.

F-88

19.4    Hedged Debt

Of the U.S. dollar denominated debt held by Enersis, as of December 31, 2013, ThCh$754,177,869 is related to future cash flow hedges for the Group’s U.S. dollar-linked operating income (ThCh$663,941,768 and ThCh$739,686,386 as of December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively) (see Note 3.m).

The following table details changes in “Reserve for cash flow hedges” as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 due to exchange differences of this debt:

	12-31-2013		12-31-2012		01-01-2012
Balance in hedging reserves (hedging income) at the beginning of the period, net		37,372,801		30,554,503	67,748,527
Foreign currency exchange differences recorded in equity, net		(24,792,601)		17,591,453	(28,520,464)
Recognition of foreign currency exchange differences in profit and loss, net		(10,087,806)		(10,657,638)	(9,306,696)
Foreign currency translation differences		(76,955)		(115,517)	633,136
Balance in hedging reserves (hedging income) at the end of the period, net		2,415,439		37,372,801	30,554,503

19.5    Other Information

As of December 31, 2013, the Enersis Group has long-term lines of credit available for use amounting to ThCh$208,900,680 (ThCh$240,683,000 and ThCh$238,832,000 as of December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively).

F-89

20. RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY

The Group’s companies are exposed to certain risks that are managed by systems that identify, measure, limit concentration of, and monitor these risks.

The main principles in the Group’s risk management policy include the following:

-    Compliance with good corporate governance standards.

-    Strict compliance with all the Group’s internal policies.

-    Each business and corporate area determines:

  I. The markets in which it can operate based on its knowledge and ability to ensure effective risk management.

 II. Criteria regarding counterparts.

III. Authorized operators.

- Business and corporate areas establish their risk tolerance in a manner consistent with the defined strategy for each market in which they operate.

- All of the operations of the businesses and corporate areas are conducted within the limits approved for each case.

- Businesses, corporate areas, lines of business and companies design the risk management controls necessary to ensure that transactions in the markets are conducted in accordance with the Enersis policies, standards, and procedures.

20.1  Interest Rate Risk

Changes in interest rates affect the fair value of assets and liabilities bearing fixed interest rates, as well as the expected future cash flows of assets and liabilities subject to floating interest rates.

The objective of managing interest rate risk exposure is to achieve a balance in the debt structure to minimize the cost of debt with reduced volatility in profit or loss.

In compliance with the current interest rate hedging policy, the proportion of fixed debt and/or hedged debt over the net total debt was 72% as of December 31, 2013.

Depending on the Group’s estimates and on the objectives of the debt structure, hedging transactions are performed by entering into derivatives contracts that mitigate interest rate risk. Derivative instruments currently used to comply with the risk management policy are interest rate swaps to set floating rate at fixed rate.

The financial debt structure of the Group detailed by fixed and/or hedged and floating interest rate on total net debt, net of hedging derivative instruments, is as follows:

Net position:

	12-31-2013			12-31-2012			01-01-2012
	%			%			%
Fixed interest rate		72	%		60	%	61%
Floating interest rate		28	%		40	%	39%
Total		100	%		100	%	100%

F-90

20.2  Exchange Rate Risk

Exchange rate risks involve basically the following transactions:

- Debt taken on by the Group’s companies that is denominated in a currency other than that in which its cash flows are indexed.

- Payments to be made for the acquisition of project-related materials and for corporate insurance policies in a currency other than that in which its cash flows are indexed.

-    Income in Group companies directly linked to changes in the dollar.

- Cash flows from foreign subsidiaries to the Chilean parent company which are exposed to exchange rate fluctuations.

In order to mitigate foreign currency risk, the Group’s foreign currency risk management policy is based on cash flows and includes maintaining a balance between U.S. dollar flows and the levels of assets and liabilities denominated in this currency. The objective is to minimize the exposure to variability in cash flows that are attributable to foreign exchange risk.

The hedging instruments currently being used to comply with the policy are currency swaps and forward exchange contracts. In addition, the policy seeks to refinance debt in the functional currency of each of the Group’s companies.

20.3  Commodities Risk

The Group has a risk exposure to price changes in certain commodities, basically due to:

- Purchases of fuel used to generate electricity.

- Energy purchase/sale transactions that take place in local markets.

In order to reduce the risk in situations of extreme drought, the Company has designed a commercial policy that defines the levels of sales commitments in line with the capacity of its generating power plants in a dry year. It also includes risk mitigation terms in certain contracts with unregulated customers and with regulated customers subject to long-term tender processes, establishing indexation polynomials that allow for reducing commodities exposure risk.

Considering the operating conditions faced by the power generation market in Chile, with drought and highly volatile commodity prices on international markets, the Company is constantly verifying the advisability of using hedging to lessen the impacts that these price swings have on its results. As of December 31, 2013, the Group has no derivative operations in effect for commodities. As of December 31, 2012, the Group had swap operations for 462,000 barrels of Brent crude oil for January 2013, and 365,000 tons of coal for February through June of 2013. (As of January 1, 2012, there were no hedging instruments in effect.)

Depending on operating conditions, which are constantly being updated, these hedges may be modified or may cover other commodities (see Note 21.3).

20.4  Liquidity Risk

The Group maintains a liquidity risk management policy that consists of entering into long-term committed banking facilities and temporary financial investments for amounts that cover the projected needs over a period of time that is determined based on the situation and expectations for debt and capital markets.

F-91

The projected needs mentioned above include maturities of financial debt, net of financial derivatives. For further details regarding the features and conditions of financial obligations and financial derivatives, see Notes 19 and 20, and Appendix No. 4.

As of December 31, 2013, the Group has cash and cash equivalent totaling ThCh$1,606,387,569 and unconditionally available lines of long-term credit totaling ThCh$208,900,680. As of December 31, 2012, the Group had ThCh$815,832,061 in cash and cash equivalents and ThCh$240,683,000 in unconditionally available lines of long-term credit (ThCh$1,187,684,209 and ThCh$238,832,000 respectively, as of January 1, 2012).

20.5  Credit Risk

The Enersis Group closely monitors its credit risk.

Trade receivables:

The credit risk for receivables from the Group’s commercial activity has historically been very low, due to the short term period of collections from customers, resulting in non-significant cumulative receivables amounts. This situation applies to both the electricity generating and distribution lines of business.

In our electricity generating business, some countries’ regulations allow the suspension of energy service to customers with outstanding payments, and most contracts have termination clauses for payment default. The Company monitors its credit risk on an ongoing basis and measures quantitatively its maximum exposure to payment default risk, which, as stated above, is very low.

In our electricity distribution companies, the suspension of energy service for customers in payment default is permitted in all cases, in accordance with current regulations in each country. This facilitates our credit risk management, which is also low in this line of business.

Financial assets:

Cash surpluses are invested in the highest-rated local and foreign financial entities (with risk rating equivalent to investment grade) with thresholds established for each entity.

Banks that have received investment grade ratings from the three major international rating agencies (Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch) are selected for making investments.

Investments may be backed with treasury bonds from the countries in which the company operates and/or with commercial papers issued by the highest rated banks; the latter are preferred, as they offer higher returns (always in line with current investment policies).

Derivative instruments are entered into with entities with solid creditworthiness; all derivative transactions are performed with entities with investment grade ratings.

20.6  Risk Measurement

The Enersis Group measures the Value at Risk (VaR) of its debt positions and financial derivatives in order to monitor the risk assumed by the Company, thereby reducing volatility in the income statement.

The portfolio of positions included in calculating the current Value at Risk consists of the following:

- Financial debt

- Hedge derivatives for debt, dividends, and projects.

F-92

The VaR determined represents the potential loss in value of the portfolio of positions described above in one day with a 95% confidence level. To determine the VaR, we take into account the volatility of the risk variables affecting the value of the portfolio of positions including:

- U.S. dollar Libor interest rate.

- The different currencies with which our companies operate and the customary local indices used in the banking industry.

- The exchange rates of the various currencies used in the calculation.

The calculation of VaR is based on generating possible future scenarios (at one day) of market values (both spot and term) for the risk variables, using Bootstrapping simulations. The number of scenarios generated ensures compliance with the simulation convergence criteria. The table of volatilities and correlations between the various risk variables calculated based on the historical values of the logarithmic price returns has been applied to simulate the future price scenario.

Once the price scenarios have been obtained, the fair value of the portfolio is calculated using such scenarios, thereby obtaining a distribution of possible values at one day. The one-day 95%-confidence VaR number is calculated as the 5% percentile of the potential increases in the fair value of the portfolio in one day.

The various debt positions and financial derivatives included in the calculation have been valued consistently using the financial capital calculation methodology reported to Management.

Taking into account the assumptions described above, the Value at Risk of the previously discussed positions, broken down by type of position, is shown in the following table:

Financial Positions	12-31-2013		12-31-2012
	ThCh$		ThCh$
Interest rate		17,236,855	15,933,808
Exchange rate		3,074,168	2,346,380
Correlation		(390,965)	(468,249)
Total		19,920,058	17,811,939

The Value at Risk positions have varied during the 2013 and 2012 fiscal years depending on the start/maturity of operations throughout each year.

F-93

21. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

21.1    Financial instruments, classified by type and category

a)      The detail of financial assets, classified by type and category, as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 is as follows:

	December 31, 2013
	Financial assets held for trading ThCh$		Financial assets at fair value with change in profit or loss ThCh$		Held-to-maturity investments ThCh$		Loans and receivables ThCh$		Available-for-sale financial assets ThCh$		Financial derivatives for hedging ThCh$
Derivative instruments		4,107,362		-		-		-		-	25,142,725
Other financial assets		-		163,288,698		588,490,652		1,079,283,455		-	-
Total Current		4,107,362		163,288,698		588,490,652		1,079,283,455		-	25,142,725
Equity instruments		-		-		-		-		4,158,231	-
Derivative instruments		-		-		-		-		-	4,403,506
Other financial assets		-		-		34,867,362		223,045,673		448,107,319	-
Total Non-current		-		-		34,867,362		223,045,673		452,265,550	4,403,506
Total		4,107,362		163,288,698		623,358,014		1,302,329,128		452,265,550	29,546,231
	December 31, 2012
	Financial assets held for trading		Financial assets at fair value with change in profit or loss		Held-to-maturity investments		Loans and receivables		Available-for-sale financial assets		Financial derivatives for hedging
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Derivative instruments		-		-		-		-		-	51,876
Other financial assets		-		194,196,327		-		894,613,988		-	-
Total Current		-		194,196,327		-		894,613,988		-	51,876
Equity instruments		-		-		-		-		4,178,597	-
Derivative instruments		-		-		-		-		-	32,384,466
Other financial assets		-		-		27,045,746		203,082,205		375,227,434	-
Total Non-current		-		-		27,045,746		203,082,205		379,406,031	32,384,466
Total		-		194,196,327		27,045,746		1,097,696,193		379,406,031	32,436,342

	January 1, 2012
	Financial assets held for trading		Financial assets at fair value with change in profit or loss		Held-to-maturity investments		Loans and receivables		Available-for-sale financial assets		Financial derivatives for hedging
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Equity instruments		-		-		-		-		-		-
Derivative instruments		47,504		-		-		-		-		748,078
Other financial assets		-		-		-		1,012,063,837		-		-
Total Current		47,504		-		-		1,012,063,837		-		748,078
Equity instruments		-		-		-		-		4,085,253		-
Derivative instruments		-		-		-		-		-		12,178,355
Other financial assets		-		-		20,793,960		443,317,694		-		-
Total Non-current		-		-		20,793,960		443,317,694		4,085,253		12,178,355
Total		47,504		-		20,793,960		1,455,381,531		4,085,253		12,926,433

F-94

b)      The detail of financial liabilities, classified by type and category, as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 is as follows:

	December 31, 2013
	Financial liabilities held for trading ThCh$		Financial liabilities at fair value with change in profit or loss ThCh$		Loans and payables ThCh$		Financial derivatives for hedging ThCh$
Interest-bearing loans		4,393,053		-		783,530,545		-
Derivative instruments		1,410,556		-		-		117,341,051
Other financial liabilities		-		-		1,624,004,602		-
Total Current		5,803,609		-		2,407,535,147		117,341,051
Interest-bearing loans		4,707,155		-		2,688,310,192		-
Derivative instruments		-		-		-		97,231,764
Other financial liabilities		-		-		23,063,878		-
Total Non-current		4,707,155		-		2,711,374,070		97,231,764
Total		10,510,764		-		5,118,909,217		214,572,815
	December 31, 2012
	Financial liabilities held for trading ThCh$		Financial liabilities at fair value with change in profit or loss ThCh$		Loans and payables ThCh$		Financial derivatives for hedging ThCh$
Interest-bearing loans		3,755,999		2,022,260		647,794,289		-
Derivative instruments		-		-		-		4,850,754
Other financial liabilities		-		-		1,345,111,257		-
Total Current		3,755,999		2,022,260		1,992,905,546		4,850,754
Interest-bearing loans		8,336,860		-		2,686,414,838		-
Derivative instruments		-		-		-		233,368,171
Other financial liabilities		-		-		14,257,438		-
Total Non-current		8,336,860		-		2,700,672,276		233,368,171
Total		12,092,859		2,022,260		4,693,577,822		238,218,925
	January 1, 2012
	Financial liabilities held for trading ThCh$		Financial liabilities at fair value with change in profit or loss ThCh$		Loans and payables ThCh$		Financial derivatives for hedging ThCh$
Interest-bearing loans		11,601,335		3,929,271		637,132,100		-
Derivative instruments		807,105		-		-		6,200,643
Other financial liabilities		-		-		1,374,639,101		-
Total Current		12,408,440		3,929,271		2,011,771,201		6,200,643
Interest-bearing loans		13,215,469		-		3,045,226,089		-
Derivative instruments		-		-		-		212,913,735
Other financial liabilities		-		-		14,304,607		-
Total Non-current		13,215,469		-		3,059,530,696		212,913,735
Total		25,623,909		3,929,271		5,071,301,897		219,114,378

21.2        Derivative Instruments

The risk management policy of the Group uses primarily interest rate and foreign exchange rate derivatives to hedge its exposure to interest rate and foreign currency risks.

The Company classifies its hedges as follows:

- Cash flow hedges: Those that hedge the cash flows of the underlying hedged item.

- Fair value hedges: Those that hedge the fair value of the underlying hedged item.

-       Non-hedge derivatives: Financial derivatives that do not meet the requirements established by IFRS to be designated as hedge instruments are recorded at fair value with changes in net income (assets held for trading).

F-95

a) Assets and liabilities for hedge derivative instruments

As of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012, financial derivative transactions qualifying as hedge instruments resulted in recognition of the following assets and liabilities in the statement of financial position:

	December 31, 2013								December 31, 2012								January 1, 2012
	Assets				Liabilities				Assets				Liabilities				Assets				Liabilities
	Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$		Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$		Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$		Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$		Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$		Current ThCh$		Non-current ThCh$
Interest rate hedge:		4,013,126		4,393,690		1,245,586		1,079,984		-		3,183,912		184,337		5,583,530		-		2,792,448		119,964	7,048,868
Cash flow hedge		4,013,126		4,393,690		1,245,586		1,079,984		-		3,183,912		184,337		5,583,530		-		2,792,448		119,964	7,048,868
Exchange rate hedge:		21,129,599		9,816		116,095,465		96,151,780		51,876		29,200,554		4,666,417		227,784,641		748,078		9,385,907		6,080,679	205,864,867
Cash flow hedge		21,129,599		9,816		116,081,484		94,681,404		51,876		29,200,554		4,648,602		224,676,991		748,078		9,385,907		3,070,825	201,717,556
Fair value hedge		-		-		13,981		1,470,376		-		-		17,815		3,107,650		-		-		3,009,854	4,147,311
TOTAL		25,142,725		4,403,506		117,341,051		97,231,764		51,876		32,384,466		4,850,754		233,368,171		748,078		12,178,355		6,200,643	212,913,735

-          General information on hedge derivative instruments

Hedge derivative instruments and their corresponding hedged instruments are shown in the following table:

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, the Group has not recognized significant gains or losses for ineffective cash flow hedges.

Detail of Hedge Instruments	Description of Hedge Instrument	Description of Hedged Instrument	Fair Value of Hedged Instruments 12/31/2013	Fair Value of Hedged Instruments 12/31/2012	Fair Value of Hedge Instruments 1/1/2012
SWAP	Interest rate	Bank borrowings	6,081,246	(2,583,955)	(4,376,384)
SWAP	Exchange rate	Bank borrowings	(1,484,357)	(3,125,465)	(7,157,165)
SWAP	Exchange rate	Unsecured obligations (bonds)	(189,623,473)	(200,073,163)	(194,654,396)

For fair value hedges the gain or losses recognized on the hedging instrument and on the underlying hedged item is detailed in the following table:

	December 31, 2013				December 31, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Gains ThCh$		Losses ThCh$		Gains ThCh$		Losses ThCh$		Gains ThCh$		Losses ThCh$
Hedge instrument		697,443		-		381,011		-		4,034,969	-
Hedged item		-		1,556,853		-		2,167,393		-	4,763,189
TOTAL		697,443		1,556,853		381,011		2,167,393		4,034,969	4,763,189

b) Financial derivative instrument assets and liabilities at fair value with changes in net income

As of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012, financial derivative transactions recorded at fair value with changes in net income, resulted in the recognition of the following assets and liabilities in the statement of financial position:

December 31, 2013

December 31, 2012

January 1, 2012

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Current ThCh$

Current ThCh$

Non-current ThCh$

Non-current ThCh$

Current ThCh$

Current ThCh$

Non-current ThCh$

Non-current ThCh$

Current ThCh$

Current ThCh$

Non-current ThCh$

Non-current ThCh$

Non-hedging derivative instruments

4,107,362

1,410,556

-

-

-

-

-

-

47,504

807,105

-

-

F-96

c)     Other information on derivatives

The following tables present the fair value of hedging and non-hedging derivatives entered into by the Group as well as the remaining contractual maturities as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012:

Financial Derivatives	December 31, 2013
	Fair value		Notional value
			Less than one year		1-2 years		2-3 years		3-4 years		4-5 years		More than 5 years		Total
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Interest rate hedge:		6,081,246		127,289,996		33,022,809		42,602,326		20,964,119		-		-	223,879,250
Cash flow hedge		6,081,246		127,289,996		33,022,809		42,602,326		20,964,119		-		-	223,879,250
Exchange rate hedge:		(191,107,830)		528,667,696		2,681,268		220,782,812		-		-		-	752,131,776
Cash flow hedge		(189,623,473)		527,137,108		1,041,243		220,782,812		-		-		-	748,961,163
Fair value hedge		(1,484,357)		1,530,588		1,640,025		-		-		-		-	3,170,612
Derivatives not designated for hedge accounting		2,696,806		294,635,535		-		-		-		-		-	294,635,535
TOTAL		(182,329,778)		950,593,226		35,704,077		263,385,139		20,964,119		-		-	1,270,646,561
Financial Derivatives	December 31, 2012
	Fair value		Notional value
			Less than one year		1-2 years		2-3 years		3-4 years		4-5 years		More than 5 years		Total
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Interest rate hedge:		(2,583,955)		6,587,265		117,831,384		33,525,893		43,789,494		20,679,250		-	222,413,286
Cash flow hedge		(2,583,955)		6,587,265		117,831,384		33,525,893		43,789,494		20,679,250		-	222,413,286
Exchange rate hedge:		(203,198,628)		10,905,551		490,286,790		1,785,653		216,342,351		-		-	719,320,345
Cash flow hedge		(200,073,163)		9,407,392		488,681,512		65,598		216,342,351		-		-	714,496,853
Fair value hedge		(3,125,465)		1,498,159		1,605,278		1,720,055		-		-		-	4,823,492
Derivatives not designated for hedge accounting		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
TOTAL		(205,782,583)		17,492,816		608,118,174		35,311,546		260,131,845		20,679,250		-	941,733,631
Financial Derivatives	January 1, 2012
	Fair value		Notional value
			Less than one year		1-2 years		2-3 years		3-4 years		4-5 years		More than 5 years		Total
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Interest rate hedge:		(4,376,384)		10,780,523		7,125,818		125,247,877		6,893,698		5,292,723		8,368,224	163,708,863
Cash flow hedge		(4,376,384)		10,780,523		7,125,818		125,247,877		6,893,698		5,292,723		8,368,224	163,708,863
Exchange rate hedge:		(201,811,561)		29,287,450		10,912,595		499,430,704		2,091,618		211,163,933		-	752,886,300
Cash flow hedge		(194,654,396)		23,473,223		9,147,062		497,538,936		64,588		211,163,933		-	741,387,742
Fair value hedge		(7,157,165)		5,814,227		1,765,533		1,891,768		2,027,030		-		-	11,498,558
Derivatives not designated for hedge accounting		(759,601)		17,569,294		-		-		-		-		-	17,569,294
TOTAL		(206,947,546)		57,637,267		18,038,413		624,678,581		8,985,316		216,456,656		8,368,224	934,164,457

The hedging and non-hedging derivatives contractual maturities do not represent the Group’s total risk exposure, as the amounts presented in the above tables have been drawn up based on undiscounted contractual cash inflows and outflows for their settlement.

21.3      Fair value hierarchies

Financial instruments recognized at fair value in the consolidated statement of financial position are classified based on the hierarchies described in Note 3.g.5.

The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012:

Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value			Fair Value Measured at  End of Reporting Period Using:
	12-31-2013		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Financial Assets
Financial derivatives designated as cash flow hedge		29,546,231		-		29,546,231	-
Financial derivatives not designated for hedge accounting		4,107,362		-		4,107,362	-
Commodity derivatives designated as cash flow hedge		129,780		-		129,780	-
Financial assets at fair value with change in net income		163,288,698		163,288,698		-	-
Available-for-sale financial assets, non-current		448,136,514		29,195		448,107,319	-
Total		645,208,585		163,317,893		481,890,692	-
Financial Liabilities
Financial derivatives designated as cash flow hedge		213,088,458		-		213,088,458	-
Financial derivatives designated as fair value hedge		1,484,357		-		1,484,357	-
Commodity derivatives designated as cash flow hedge		-		-		-	-
Financial derivatives not designated for hedge accounting		1,410,556		-		1,410,556	-
Interest-bearing borrowings, short term		4,393,053		-		4,393,053	-
Interest-bearing borrowings, long term		4,707,155		-		4,707,155	-
Other short-term financial liabilities		-		-		-	-
Total		225,083,579		-		225,083,579	-

F-97

Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value			Fair Value Measured at End of  Reporting Period Using:
	12-31-2012 ThCh$		Level 1 ThCh$		Level 2 ThCh$		Level 3   ThCh$
Financial Assets
Financial derivatives designated as cash flow hedge		32,436,342		-		32,436,342	-
Commodity derivatives designated as cash flow hedge		784,741		-		784,741	-
Financial assets at fair value with change in net income		194,196,327		194,196,327		-	-
Available-for-sale financial assets, non-current		375,258,902		31,468		375,227,434	-
Total		602,676,312		194,227,795		408,448,517	-
Financial Liabilities
Financial derivatives designated as cash flow hedge		235,093,460		-		235,093,460	-
Financial derivatives designated as fair value hedge		3,125,465		-		3,125,465	-
Commodity derivatives designated as cash flow hedge		32,200		-		32,200	-
Interest-bearing borrowings, short term		3,755,999		-		3,755,999	-
Interest-bearing borrowings, long term		8,336,860		-		8,336,860	-
Other short-term financial liabilities		2,022,260		-		-	2,022,260
Total		252,366,244		-		250,343,984	2,022,260
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value			Fair Value Measured at End of  Reporting Period Using:
	01-01-2012 ThCh$		Level 1 ThCh$		Level 2 ThCh$		Level 3 ThCh$
Financial Assets
Financial derivatives designated as cash flow hedge		12,926,433		-		12,926,433	-
Financial derivatives not designated for hedge accounting		47,504		-		47,504	-
Available-for-sale financial assets, non-current		86,852		86,852		-	-
Total		13,060,789		86,852		12,973,937	-
Financial Liabilities
Financial derivatives designated as cash flow hedge		211,957,213		-		211,957,213	-
Financial derivatives designated as fair value hedge		7,157,165		-		7,157,165	-
Financial derivatives not designated for hedge accounting		807,105		-		807,105	-
Interest-bearing borrowings, short term		11,601,335		-		11,601,335	-
Interest-bearing borrowings, long term		13,215,469		-		13,215,469	-
Other short-term financial liabilities		3,929,271		-		-	3,929,271
Total		248,667,558		-		244,738,287	3,929,271

21.3.1 The following is the reconciliation between opening and closing balances for financial instruments whose fair value is classified at level 3:

Non-current Interest-bearing Borrowings	ThCh$
Balance at January 1, 2012	3,929,271
Total profit recognized in financial profit or loss	(1,907,011)
Balance at December 31, 2012	2,022,260
Total profit recognized in financial profit or loss	(2,022,260)
Balance at December 31, 2013	0

The fair value of Level 3 has been calculated by applying a traditional discounted cash flow method. These projected cash flows include assumptions from within the company that are primarily based on estimates for prices and levels of energy production and firm capacity, as well as the costs of operating and maintaining some of our plants.

None of the possible reasonable scenarios foreseeable in the assumptions mentioned in the above paragraph would result in a significant change in the fair value of the financial instruments included at this level.

F-98

22. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

The breakdown of Trade and other payables as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 is as follows:

	Current						Non-current
Trade and Other Payables	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$
Trade payables		503,498,609		403,045,758		383,776,345		-		-		-
Other payables		916,093,723		791,805,992		829,611,968		23,063,878		14,257,438		14,304,607
Total		1,419,592,332		1,194,851,750		1,213,388,313		23,063,878		14,257,438		14,304,607

The detail of Trade Accounts and other Payables as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 is as follows:

			Current				Non-current
							One to five years
Trade and Other Payables	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$
Energy suppliers		473,475,615		362,234,278		349,896,152		-		-		-
Fuel and gas suppliers		30,022,994		40,811,480		33,880,193		-		-		-
Payables for goods and services		585,516,463		531,033,373		517,210,243		-		24,806		243,790
Dividends payable to non-controlling interests		171,536,664		117,317,629		161,073,860		-		-		-
Fines and complaints (*)		84,104,347		78,970,305		74,994,982		-		-		-
Research and development		21,530,534		24,036,804		17,971,576		16,772,447		7,544,852		3,894,943
Payables to tax authorities		2,834,294		5,416,568		17,684,946		126,137		4,151,439		7,580,699
Mitsubishi contract (LTSA)		24,837,227		16,988,406		11,514,861		-		-		-
Obligations for social programs		9,647,096		3,663,538		14,987,123		-		-		-
Other payables		16,087,098		14,379,369		14,174,377		6,165,294		2,536,341		2,585,175
Total		1,419,592,332		1,194,851,750		1,213,388,313		23,063,878		14,257,438		14,304,607

See Note 20.4 for the description of the liquidity risk management policy.

(*) This corresponds mainly to fines and complaints our Argentine subsidiary Edesur S.A. has received during this and previous fiscal years from the regulatory agency due to business service quality, technical product quality, and public safety. These fines have not been paid, as some were suspended under the Agreement Act signed in 2007 with the Argentine government, and others are pending until the Integral Tariff Review (ITR) takes place (see Note 5.2).

F-99

    23. PROVISIONS

a) The breakdown of provisions as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 is as follows:

Provisions	Current						Non-current
	12-31-2013       ThCh$		12-31-2012       ThCh$		01-01-2012       ThCh$		12-31-2013       ThCh$		12-31-2012       ThCh$		01-01-2012       ThCh$
Provision for legal proceedings		56,337,107		31,476,623		49,741,677		164,694,598		155,901,482		186,626,567
Decommissioing, restoration, and rehabilitation costs (1)		-		-		-		24,109,594		20,475,846		13,472,195
Provision for suppliers and services		14,682,069		11,635,899		9,689,600		5,163,161		-		-
Provision for employee benefits		33,253,379		27,311,156		31,162,406		-		100,707		65,221
Other provisions		14,310,103		19,307,024		8,595,703		-		97,000		1,851,856
Total		118,582,658		89,730,702		99,189,386		193,967,353		176,575,035		202,015,839

(1)      See Note 3a.

b) Changes in provisions as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 are as follows:

Changes in Provisions	Legal Proceedings ThCh$		Decommissioning, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Costs ThCh$		Other Provisions ThCh$		Total ThCh$
Opening balance at January 1, 2013		187,378,105		20,475,846		58,451,786		266,305,737
Additional provisions		-		2,176,598		-		2,176,598
Increase (decrease) in existing provisions		30,020,151		14,952		28,019,971		58,055,074
Acquisitions through business combinations under common control		9,403,960		357,755		-		9,761,715
Provision used		(23,712,842)		(207,158)		(16,114,633)		(40,034,633)
Increase from adjustment to value of money over time		18,085,233		1,216,334		19,256,130		38,557,697
Foreign currency translation		(9,039,781)		75,267		(8,375,698)		(17,340,212)
Other increase (decrease)		8,896,879		-		(13,828,844)		(4,931,965)
Total Changes in Provisions		33,653,600		3,633,748		8,956,926		46,244,274
Balance at December 31, 2013		221,031,705		24,109,594		67,408,712		312,550,011
Changes in Provisions	Legal Proceedings       ThCh$		Decommissioning,       Restoration, and       Rehabilitation Costs       ThCh$		Other Provisions       ThCh$		Total       ThCh$
Opening balance at January 1, 2012		236,368,244		13,472,195		51,364,786		301,205,225
Additional provisions		-		6,350,280		-		6,350,280
Increase (decrease) in existing provisions		(10,979,847)		2,890		1,732,867		(9,244,090)
Provision used		(35,949,989)		(112,792)		(18,253,231)		(54,316,012)
Unused provision reversed		-		-		-		-
Increase from adjustment to value of money over time		26,299,019		513,394		20,531,128		47,343,541
Foreign currency translation		(28,541,694)		206,748		(7,091,382)		(35,426,328)
Other increase (decrease)		182,372		43,131		10,167,618		10,393,121
Total Changes in Provisions		(48,990,139)		7,003,651		7,087,000		(34,899,488)
Balance at December 31, 2012		187,378,105		20,475,846		58,451,786		266,305,737

F-100

24. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS

24.1  General information

Enersis S.A. and certain of its subsidiaries in Chile, Brazil, Colombia, and Argentina provide various post-employment benefits for all or some of its active or retired employees. These benefits are calculated and recorded in the financial statements according to the criteria described in Note 3.l.1, and include primarily the following:

a)  Defined benefit plans

• Complementary pension: The beneficiary is entitled to receive a monthly amount that supplements the pension obtained from the respective social security system.

• Employee severance indemnities: The beneficiary receives a certain number of contractual salaries upon retirement. Such benefit is subject to a vesting minimum service requirement period, which depending on the company, varies within a range from 5 to 15 years.

• Electricity: The beneficiary receives a monthly bonus to cover a portion of his/her billed residential electricity consumption.

• Health benefit: The beneficiary receives health coverage in addition to that to which s/he is entitled under his/her social security regime.

b)  Other benefits

Five-year benefit: A benefit certain employees receive after 5 years and which begin to accrue from the second year onwards.

Unemployment: A benefit paid regardless of whether the employee is fired or leaves voluntarily. This benefit accrues on a daily basis and is paid at the time of contract termination (although the law allows for partial withdrawals for housing and education).

Seniority bonuses in Peru: There is an agreement to give workers (“subject to the collective agreement”) an extraordinary bonus for years of service upon completion of the equivalent of five years of actual work. This benefit is given according to the following scale:

After 5, 10, and 15 years	–	1	basic monthly salary
After 20 years	–	1 1⁄2	basic monthly salaries
After 25, 30, 35, and 40 years		2 1⁄2	basic monthly salaries

c)  Defined contribution benefits

The Group makes contributions to a retirement benefit plan where the beneficiary receives additional pension supplements upon his/her retirement, disability, or death.

F-101

24.2  Details, Changes, and Presentation in Financial Statements

a) The post-employment obligations associated with defined benefits plans and the related assets plan as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 are detailed as follows:

General ledger accounts:

	Balance at
	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$
Post-employment obligations non/current		238,514,991		256,161,368		269,353,075
Total Liabilities		238,514,991		256,161,368		269,353,075
Total post-employment obligations, net		238,514,991		256,161,368		269,353,075

Reconciliation with general ledger accounts:

	Balance at
	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$
Post-employment obligations		521,850,486		628,823,491		592,212,012
(-) Fair value of asset plan (*)		(322,830,274)		(393,880,165)		(366,137,888)
Total		199,020,212		234,943,326		226,074,124
Amount not recognized as an asset due to limit on Defined Benefit Plan Assets		39,494,779		21,218,042		43,278,951
Total post-employment obligations, net		238,514,991		256,161,368		269,353,075
(*) Plan assets to fund defined benefit plans in our Brazilian subsidiaries (Ampla and Coelce) only; the remaining defined benefit plans in our other subsidiaries are unfunded.

 The following table presents the balance recorded in the Consolidated Financial Situation Statement as a result of the difference between the actuarial liability from defined benefit commitments and the fair value of the assets affected as of December 31, 2013 and the close of the four previous fiscal years:

	12-31-2013		12-31-2012		12-31-2011		12-31-2010		12-31-2009
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Actuarial liability		521,850,486		628,823,491		592,212,012		548,004,356		503,721,949
Assets affected		(322,830,274)		(393,880,165)		(366,137,888)		(377,239,859)		(362,690,337)
Difference		199,020,212		234,943,326		226,074,124		170,764,497		141,031,612
Limitation not recognized due to limit on Benefit Plan Assets		39,494,779		21,218,042		43,278,951		42,952,266		39,960,319
Transfer to assets classified as held for sale		-		-		-		(2,786,493)		-
Accounting balance of actuarial liability deficit		238,514,991		256,161,368		269,353,075		210,930,270		180,991,931

b) The following amounts were recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Expense Recognized in Profit or Loss	12-31-2013		12-31-2012		12-31-2011
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Current service cost for defined benefits plan		4,462,712		3,689,477		4,323,923
Interest cost for defined benefits plan		54,773,138		53,828,477		56,225,969
Interest income from the plan’s assets		(37,219,214)		(34,379,133)		(44,345,866)
Interest cost on asset ceiling components		2,422,955		-		-
Expenses recognized in Profit or Loss		24,439,591		23,138,821		16,204,026
Net actuarial (gains) losses		(6,351,518)		14,044,750		61,614,524
Total expense recognized in Comprehensive Income		18,088,073		37,183,571		77,818,550

F-102

c) The presentation of net actuarial liabilities at December 31, 2013 is as follows:

Net Actuarial Liabilities	ThCh$
Opening balance at January 1, 2013		256,161,368
Net interest cost		19,976,881
Service cost during the period		4,462,712
Benefits paid during the period		(15,517,133)
Contributions during the period		(14,383,865)
Actuarial (gains) losses from changes in financial assumptions		(100,972,717)
Actuarial (gains) losses from changes in seniority adjustments		6,468,147
Performance of plan assets, excluding interest		75,783,858
Changes in the asset limit		15,853,780
Foreign currency translation differences		(9,318,040)
Net actuarial liabilities at December 31, 2013		238,514,991

d) The balance and changes in post-employment defined benefit obligations as of December 31, 2013 and for the 2012 fiscal year are as follows:

Actuarial Value of Post-employment Obligations	ThCh$
Opening balance at January 1, 2012		592,212,012
Current service cost		3,689,477
Interest cost		53,828,477
Contributions from plan participants		1,133,093
Actuarial (gains) losses from changes in financial assumptions		55,473,069
Actuarial (gains) losses from changes in seniority adjustments		28,704,577
Foreign currency translation		(60,408,303)
Benefits paid		(46,161,462)
Other		352,551
Balance at December 31, 2012		628,823,491
Current service cost		4,462,712
Interest cost		54,773,138
Contributions from plan participants		1,137,338
Actuarial (gains) losses from changes in financial assumptions		(100,972,717)
Actuarial (gains) losses from changes in seniority adjustments		6,468,147
Foreign currency translation		(24,305,459)
Benefits paid		(48,536,164)
Balance at December 31, 2013		521,850,486

As of December 31, 2013, out of the total amount of post-employment benefit obligations, 8.25% is from defined benefit plans in Chilean companies (6.38% at December 31, 2012); 74.67% is from defined benefit plans in Brazilian companies (79.54% at December 31, 2012); 14.82% is from defined benefit plans in Colombian companies (12.61% at December 31, 2012); 1.85% is from defined benefit plans in Argentine subsidiaries (1.12% at December 31, 2012); and the remaining 0.41% is from defined benefit plans in Peruvian companies (0.35% at December 31, 2012).

F-103

e) Changes in the fair value of the benefit plan assets are as follows:

Fair Value of Benefit Plan Assets	ThCh$
Opening balance at January 1, 2012		(366,137,888)
Interest income		(34,379,133)
Performance of plan assets, excluding interest		(85,384,376)
Foreign currency translation		73,137,727
Employer contributions		(1,133,093)
Contributions paid		(11,477,878)
Benefits paid		31,494,476
Balance at December 31, 2012		(393,880,165)
Interest income		(37,219,214)
Performance of plan assets, excluding interest		75,783,858
Foreign currency translation		14,987,419
Employer contributions		(1,137,338)
Contributions paid		(14,383,865)
Benefits paid		33,019,031
Balance at December 31, 2013		(322,830,274)

f) The main categories of benefit plan assets are as follows:

Category of Benefit Plan Assets	12-31-2013			12-31-2012			01-01-2012
	ThCh$		%	ThCh$		%	ThCh$		%
Equity instruments (variable income)		52,901,001	16%		52,904,778	13%		55,291,894	15%
Fixed-income assets		232,840,825	72%		295,967,203	75%		275,643,406	75%
Real estate investments		24,609,293	8%		29,632,539	8%		20,653,101	6%
Other		12,479,155	4%		15,375,645	4%		14,549,487	4%
Total		322,830,274	100%		393,880,165	100%		366,137,888	100%

g) Reconciliation of asset ceiling:

Reconciliation of Asset Ceiling	ThCh$
Opening balance at January 1, 2012		43,278,951
Other changes in assets not recognized due to asset limit		(16,128,654)
Foreign currency translation		(5,932,255)
Balance at December 31, 2012		21,218,042
Interest on assets not recognized		2,422,955
Other changes in assets not recognized due to asset limit		17,475,375
Foreign currency translation		(1,621,593)
Total asset ceiling at December 31, 2013		39,494,779

The average return on plan assets was 9.98% as of December 31, 2013.

The following table presents the assets affected by the plans and invested in shares, leases, and real estate owned by the Group:

	12-31-2013		12-31-2012		01-01-2012
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Shares		3		3		5
Real estate		21,899,207		12,825,725		10,152,936
Total		21,899,210		12,825,728		10,152,941

F-104

24.3 Other disclosures

  — Actuarial assumptions

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 the following assumptions were used in the actuarial calculation of defined benefits:

	Chile		Brazil		Colombia		Argentina		Peru
	12-31-2013	12-31-2012	12-31-2013	12-31-2012	12-31-2013	12-31-2012	12-31-2013	12-31-2012	12-31-2013	12-31-2012
Discount rates used	5.40%	6.00%	11.82% - 12.44%	9.98%	7.25%	8.00%	5.50%	5.50%	6.80%	5.50%
Expected rate of salary increases	3.00%	3.00%	7.61%	7.61%	4.00%	3.5% - 4.0% - 4.5%	0.00%	0.00%	3.00%	3.00%
Mortality tables	RV -2004	RV -2004	AT 2000	AT 2000	RV 2008	RV 2008	RV 2004	RV 2004	RV 2004	RV 2004

  — Sensitivity

As of December 31, 2013, the sensitivity of the value of the actuarial liability for post-employment benefits to variations of 100 basis points in the discount rate assumes a decrease of ThCh$41,964,612 (ThCh$59,036,348 and ThCh$53,990,483 as of December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012) if the rate rises and an increase of ThCh$49,310,554 (ThCh$70,761,453 and ThCh$64,370,187 as of December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012) if the rate falls.

  — Defined contributions

The total expense recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income within line item “Employee expenses” represents contributions payables to the defined contribution plans by the Group. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the amounts recognized as expenses were ThCh$3,140,681 (ThCh$2,092,037 and ThCh$1,998,189 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively).

  — Future disbursements

The estimates available indicate that ThCh$29,950,938 will be disbursed for defined benefit plans in the coming year.

  — Length of commitments

The Enersis Group’s obligations have a weighted average length of 12.10 years, and the flow for benefits for the next 5 years and more is expected to be as follows:

years	ThCh$
1	53,431,105
2	49,435,747
3	49,813,814
4	49,481,701
5	49,992,831
More than 5	261,641,616

F-105

25. EQUITY

25.1 Equity attributable to the shareholders of Enersis

 25.1.1         Subscribed and paid capital and number of shares

The Enersis Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on December 20, 2012 approved a capital increase of ThCh$2,844,397,890 divided into 16,441,606,297 shares of single series nominative common stock, non-preference and with no par value.

The shares were paid for as follows:

a) Endesa S.A. made a non-monetary payment for a total amount of ThCh$1,724,400,000 corresponding to 9,967,630,058 shares of Enersis stock at a price of Ch$173 per share.

  For more information on the stakes contributed by Endesa S.A., see Note 4.

b) Cash contribution from non-controlling interests at a price of Ch$173 per share.

During the preemptive right period for the subscription of shares which was from February 25 to March 26, 2013, a total of 16,284,562,981 shares were subscribed and paid up, equivalent to 99.04% of the total authorized shares, leaving a total of 157,043,316 shares unsubscribed. Of the subscribed and paid-up shares, 9,967,630,058 shares corresponded Endesa S.A. and 6,316,932,923 shares to non-controlling interests, of which 1,675,441,700 were subscribed in the U.S. (33,508,834 in ADRs).

The 157,043,316 shares still to be placed were auctioned on March 28 at Ch$182.3 per share. The total amount raised in the auction was ThCh$28,628,996, which includes a share placement surcharge of ThCh$1,460,503.

Given the increase, the share capital of Enersis increased to ThCh$5,669,280,725 as of December 31, 2013, divided into 49,092,772,762, shares. At December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012, the share capital of Enersis was ThCh$2,824,882,835 divided into 32,651,166,465 shares.

As of December 31, 2013, all of the shares issued by Enersis are subscribed and paid up, and they are listed for trade on the Bolsa de Comercio de Santiago de Chile, the Bolsa Electrónica de Chile, the Bolsa de Valores de Valparaiso, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), and the Bolsa de Valores Latinoamericanos of the Bolsa de Madrid (LATIBEX). The situation was similar at December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012.

The share premium corresponds to the share placement surcharge from the capital increases that took place in 2003 and 1995. In the former increase, the surcharge was ThCh$125,881,577, and in the latter it was ThCh$32,878,071.

The share placement surcharge generated during the recent capital increase, amounting to ThCh$1,460,503 as indicated above, absorbed a portion of the share issuance and placement expenses incurred in the process (see Note 25.5.c).

 25.1.2         Dividends

At the Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 26, 2011, it was unanimously agreed to pay a minimum obligatory dividend (partially paid through interim dividend No. 82) and an additional dividend totaling Ch$7.44578. Given that the interim dividend No. 82 had already been paid, distribution and payment of the balance of final dividend No. 83 totaling Ch$5.87398 per share was made from May 12, 2011 onwards.

The foregoing constitutes a modification to the Company’s 2010 dividend policy, which considered payment of the interim dividend in December.

F-106

The Enersis Board, at its Ordinary Session held on November 30, 2011, unanimously agreed to distribute an interim dividend of Ch$1.46560 per share on January 27, 2012 to be charged against the 2011 fiscal year net income; the amount to be distributed amounts to 15% of the liquid profits calculated as of September 30, 2011.

On February 29, 2012, the Enersis Board agreed, by a unanimous vote of the Directors present, to propose at the Enersis S.A. Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting that the same percentage of profits be distributed as in the previous year, that is, 50% of the Company’s net profits. For this fiscal year, that percentage is the equivalent of Ch$5.7497 per share, from which the interim dividend of Ch$1.46560 per share paid in January 2012 will be deducted. Therefore, the final dividend amount distributed to shareholders will be Ch$4.2841 per Company share. This is a change from the previous dividend policy, which contemplated distributing 55% of the Company’s net profits in dividends.

At the Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 26, 2012, it was agreed to distribute a minimum obligatory dividend (partially covered by interim dividend No. 84) and an additional dividend totaling Ch$5.74970. Since interim dividend 84 had already been paid, the remaining Ch$4.28410 per share was distributed and paid as final dividend No. 85.

Fulfillment of the aforementioned dividend plan is subject to the actual net income earned by the Company during the current year, and to the results of the Company’s periodic income projections or to the existence of certain conditions, as applicable.

On November 29, 2012, the Directors present at the meeting of the Board voted unanimously to distribute interim dividend No. 86 of Ch$1.21538 per share on January 25, 2013, to be charged against fiscal year 2012 results. This corresponds to 15% of the company’s net income calculated as of September 30, 2012, in accordance with the company’s current dividend policy.

At the Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 16, 2013, it was agreed to distribute a minimum obligatory dividend (partially consisting of interim dividend No. 86) and an additional dividend, which together amounted to a total of Ch$4.25027 per share. Since interim dividend No. 86 has already been paid, the remainder will be distributed and paid in final dividend No. 87 at Ch$3.03489 per share.

On November 26, 2013, the Directors present at the meeting of the Board voted unanimously to distribute interim dividend no. 88 of Ch$1.42964 per share on January 31, 2014, to be charged against fiscal year 2013 results. This corresponds to 15% of the company’s net income as calculated on September 30, 2013, in accordance with the company’s current dividend policy.

The following table details the dividends paid in recent years:

	Type of Dividend	Payment Date	Pesos per Share	Charged to
72	Final	04-20-2005	0.41654	2004
73	Final	04-03-2006	1.00000	2005
74	Interim	12-26-2006	1.11000	2006
75	Final	05-23-2007	4.89033	2006
76	Interim	12-27-2007	0.53119	2007
77	Final	04-30-2008	3.41256	2007
78	Interim	12-19-2008	1.53931	2008
79	Final	05-12-2009	4.56069	2008
80	Interim	12-17-2009	2.45677	2009
81	Final	05-06-2010	4.64323	2009
82	Interim	01-27-2011	1.57180	2010
83	Final	05-12-2011	5.87398	2010
84	Interim	01-27-2012	1.46560	2011
85	Final	05-09-2012	4.28410	2011
86	Interim	01-25-2013	1.21538	2012
87	Final	05-10-2013	3.03489	2012
88	Interim	01-31-2014	1.42964	2013

F-107

  25.2    Foreign Currency Translation Reserves

The following table details currency translation adjustments attributable to the shareholders of Enersis, in the consolidated statement of financial position as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011:

Reserves for Accumulated Currency Translation Differences	31-12-2013          ThCh$		31-12-2012          ThCh$		31-12-2011          ThCh$
Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A.		(72,729,629)		(68,251,285)		(72,109,861)
Ampla Energía E Serviços S.A.		23,785,914		52,686,506		125,398,489
Ampla Investimentos E Serviços S.A.		-		3,513,918		1,047,218
Compañía Distribuidora y Comercializadora de energía S.A.		154,005,545		22,285,125		20,185,717
Edelnor		16,231,253		6,517,665		10,327,272
Investluz S.A.		-		(5,725,690)		3,630,372
Endesa Brasil S.A.		(258,218,756)		(104,168,848)		20,839,624
Central Costanera S.A.		578,662		(2,677,497)		(6,301,808)
Gas Atacama S.A.		5,020,651		(646,559)		3,979,726
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.		76,006,120		53,834,515		51,141,069
Hidroelectrica El Chocon S.A.		(26,372,986)		(19,040,997)		(9,846,088)
Generandes Perú S.A.		24,832,786		24,592,212		28,938,192
Emp. Eléctrica de Piura		3,379,674		-		-
Other		(2,541,250)		(3,639,124)		(607,254)
TOTAL		(56,022,016)		(40,720,059)		176,622,668

25.3  Capital Management

The Company’s objective is to maintain an adequate level of capitalization in order to be able to secure its access to the financial markets, so as to fulfill its medium- and long-term goals while maximizing the return to its shareholders and maintaining a sound financial position.

25.4  Restrictions on Subsidiaries’ Transferring Funds to the Parent

Certain of the Group’s subsidiaries must comply with financial ratio covenants which require them to have a minimum level of equity or other requirements that restrict the transferring of assets to Enersis. The Group’s restricted net assets as of December 31, 2013 from its subsidiaries Endesa Chile, Ampla Energía, Coelce, Edelnor, and Piura totaled ThCh$963,763,217, ThCh$431,997,899, ThCh$59,818,971, ThCh$ 130,412,837, and ThCh$23,948,075, respectively.

25.5  Other Reserves

Other reserves within Equity attributable to shareholders of Enersis as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 are as follows:

	Balance at     January 1, 2013     ThCh$		2013 Changes       ThCh$		Balance at December 31, 2013 ThCh$
Exchange differences on translation		(40,720,059)		(15,301,957)		(56,022,016)
Cash flow hedges		27,594,028		(30,680,754)		(3,086,726)
Remeasurement of available-for-sale financial assets		13,647		(1,836)		11,811
Other miscellaneous reserves		(1,498,010,369)		(916,013,117)		(2,414,023,486)
TOTAL		(1,511,122,753)		(961,997,664)		(2,473,120,417)

F-108

	Balance at      January 1, 2012      ThCh$		2012 Changes         ThCh$		Balance at December 31, 2012 ThCh$
Exchange differences on translation		176,622,668		(217,342,727)		(40,720,059)
Cash flow hedges		(310,265)		27,904,293		27,594,028
Remeasurement of available-for-sale financial assets		13,836		(189)		13,647
Other miscellaneous reserves		(1,497,208,996)		(801,373)		(1,498,010,369)
TOTAL		(1,320,882,757)		(190,239,996)		(1,511,122,753)
	Balance at      January 1, 2011      ThCh$		2011 Changes         ThCh$		Balance at December 31, 2011 ThCh$
Exchange differences on translation		113,278,890		63,343,778		176,622,668
Cash flow hedges		40,783,463		(41,093,728)		(310,265)
Remeasurement of available-for-sale financial assets		41,825		(27,989)		13,836
Other miscellaneous reserves		(1,505,891,534)		8,682,538		(1,497,208,996)
TOTAL		(1,351,787,356)		30,904,599		(1,320,882,757)

a) Reserves for foreign currency translation differences:These arise primarily from exchange differences relating to:

- Translation of the financial statements of our foreign operations from their functional currencies to our presentation currency (i.e. Chilean peso) (see Note 2.6.3); and

- Translation of goodwill arising from the acquisition of foreign operations with a functional currency other than the Chilean peso (see Note 3.c).

b) Cash flow hedging reserves:These represent the cumulative portion of gains and losses on hedging instruments deemed effective in cash flow hedges (Note 3.g.4. and 3.m).

c) Other reserves

Changes in the 2013 period originated primarily from the effects of the Enersis capital increase which, as described in Note 25.1.1, was completed recently.

The main items and their effects are the following:

1) A charge of ThCh$897,856,110 resulting from the Enersis capital increase that took place in the first quarter of 2013 (see Note 4).

2) A charge of ThCh$18,581,809 corresponding to share issuance and placement expenses calculated according to the accounting criteria described in Note 3.t). The detail of these expenses is as follows:

Description of Expense	Gross Amount   ThCh$		Tax Effect   ThCh$		Net Amount   ThCh$
Legal advising services		1,154,819		(230,964)		923,855
Financial advising services and placement fees		22,436,327		(4,487,265)		17,949,062
Audits		1,113,980		(222,796)		891,184
Other expenses		347,764		(69,553)		278,211
Sub Total		25,052,890		(5,010,578)		20,042,312
Less
Share placement surcharge		1,460,503				1,460,503
Total		23,592,387		(5,010,578)		18,581,809

F-109

The other important items included in the balance in Other Miscellaneous Reserves as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are explained as follows:

i) In accordance with (Official Bulletin) No. 456 from the Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros de Chile (SVS), included in this line item is the monetary correction corresponding to the accumulated paid-up capital from the date of our transition to IFRS, June 1, 2004, to December 31, 2008.

Please note that, while the Company adopted the IFRS as its statutory accounting standards on January 1, 2009, the date of transition to that international standard used was the same as that used by its parent company, Endesa S.A., January 1, 2004. This results from applying the exemption for that purpose in IFRS 1, “First Time Adoption”.

ii) Foreign currency translation differences existing at the time of transition to IFRS (IFRS 1 exemption, First Time Adoption).

ii) The effects of business combinations under common control, arising primarily from the creation of the holding company Endesa Brasil in 2005 and the merger of our Colombian subsidiaries Emgesa and Betania in 2007.

25.6  Non-controlling Interests

The detail of non-controlling interests is as follows:

	Non-controlling Financial Interests
	12-31-2013	Equity						Profit (Loss)
Companies		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
	%
Ampla Energía E Serviços S.A.	8.37%		50,325,686		153,046,559		141,726,169		17,576,812		34,941,553		20,667,055
Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	50.82%		194,582,550		267,523,158		304,467,294		22,491,849		65,199,582		88,302,196
Compañía de Interconexión Energética S.A.	16.46%		20,523,680		57,502,251		62,254,091		5,585,932		8,256,234		15,228,503
Centrais Elétricas Cachoeira Dourada S.A.	16.67%		20,550,888		84,377,883		105,089,989		19,421,933		49,250,755		52,250,800
Central Generadora Termoeléctrica Fortaleza S.A.	16.46%		25,500,826		65,178,903		77,308,850		9,124,774		16,468,577		18,445,248
Investluz S.A.             (2)	14.12%		-		39,767,817		45,399,029		32,475		(267,282)		(3,219,527)
Endesa Brasil S.A.   (2)	16.46%		52,174,858		130,339,145		64,771,303		2,483,175		1,260,153		4,875,814
Compañía Distribuidora y Comercializadora de energía S.A.	51.61%		318,351,067		475,192,241		387,922,750		82,405,481		113,305,998		70,823,497
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	62.28%		585,104,934		765,027,983		738,982,633		154,972,672		168,794,229		107,768,893
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A	24.46%		57,809,739		85,831,223		81,916,834		14,092,812		16,951,832		17,532,247
Edegel S.A.A	62.54%		249,172,825		242,251,459		240,843,403		39,452,495		25,846,262		36,624,589
Chinango S.A.C.	70.03%		44,855,657		45,123,137		40,804,028		7,119,623		8,478,503		5,722,963
Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A.	28.39%		8,070,946		(24,151,103)		1,689,191		25,639,856		(27,969,542)		(54,483,581)
Endesa Costanera S.A.	54.60%		(15,235,982)		(36,065,405)		(13,280,123)		(12,759,740)		(27,568,761)		(13,139,277)
Hidroelectrica El Chocon S.A.	60.79%		49,208,752		52,313,882		58,148,646		6,689,850		8,753,287		7,391,109
Central Dock Sud S.A.	60.01%		(26,372,765)		-		-		(20,472,366)		-		-
Chilectra S.A.	0.91%		6,292,208		6,083,234		4,839,484		951,782		1,073,199		726,512
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A	40.02%		430,280,244		428,724,770		425,494,535		(13,063,119)		(96,486,019)		14,584,540
Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.	44.43%		77,111,844		74,660,915		77,689,979		50,864,670		114,456,226		51,687,788
Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A.         (1)	38.51%		149,375,880		30,548,711		36,643,889		8,271,743		(6,094,852)		458,766
Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A.              (1)	-		-		-		56,064,957		-		5,009,413		33,715,326
Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A.       (1)	38.26%		-		54,708,400		27,095,085		20,766,987		23,654,944		17,852,702
Endesa Eco S.A.                                       (1)	38.43%		-		32,817,205		(2,831,030)		6,255,569		4,332,107		1,307,815
Constructora y Proyectos Los Maitenes S.A.	45.00%		25,446,652		24,153,240		21,789,839		3,543,412		4,613,400		1,591,664
Other			15,780,119		9,452,866		10,481,760		3,437,919		3,402,649		(234,773)
TOTAL			2,338,910,608		3,064,408,474		2,995,312,585		454,886,596		515,662,447		496,480,869

  (1)    On May 1, 2012, Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. was merged with Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. On September 1, 2013, Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. was merged with Endesa Eco S.A., and on November 1, 2013, Endesa Eco was merged with Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A. It is the latter company that legally continues to exist.

  (2)    On November 21, 2013, Investluz S.A. and Ampla Investimentos S.A. were merged with Endesa Brasil S.A. It is the latter company that legally continues to exist.

F-110

26. REVENUES

The detail of revenues presented in the Statement of Comprehensive Income as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 is as follows:

Revenues	Balance at
	12-31-2013              ThCh$		12-31-2012             ThCh$		12-31-2011          ThCh$
Energy sales (1)		5,168,220,551		5,725,898,591		5,669,610,799
Other sales		56,401,832		20,021,897		20,952,383
Metering equipment sales		3,299,824		2,588,881		2,229,019
Natural gas sales		34,078,691		-		-
Electronic materials sales		19,023,317		17,433,016		18,723,364
Revenue from other services		472,154,857		436,203,210		416,579,629
Tolls and transmission		313,101,013		319,135,832		249,719,988
Metering equipment leases		4,700,987		4,653,801		6,540,680
Public lighting		30,810,947		32,613,523		27,583,293
Verifications and connections		29,834,227		13,653,352		15,605,137
Engineering and consulting services		15,324,053		17,620,795		11,896,382
Other services		78,383,630		48,525,907		105,234,149
Total operating revenue		5,696,777,240		6,182,123,698		6,107,142,811
Other Operating Income	Balance at
	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
Revenue from construction contracts		159,283,676		151,969,334		179,051,253
Mutual support		29,071,409		32,822,150		25,188,962
Third party services to own and third-party fixtures		10,099,168		11,952,534		8,693,287
Leases		1,057,795		1,202,395		765,055
Sale of new businesses		14,504,231		12,824,744		12,619,489
Other revenue (2)		353,652,383		103,058,593		53,139,037
Total other income		567,668,662		313,829,750		279,457,083

(1) Includes ThCh$29,217,154 at December 31, 2012 from agreements corresponding to reconciliation, termination of arbitration, and settling of prices between Endesa Chile and Compañía de Papeles y Cartones (CMPC).

(2) Resolution 250/13 and Note 6852/13 from the Argentine Energy Secretariat recognized costs not transferred to tariffs from 2007 to September 2013 under application of the Cost Monitoring Mechanism (MMC). This has allowed for recognizing ThCh$250,533,319 in other operating income in our subsidiary Edesur S.A.

F-111

27. RAW MATERIALS AND CONSUMABLES USED

The detail of raw materials and consumables used presented in profit or loss for the periods ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 is as follows:

Raw Materials and Consumables Used	Balance at
	12-31-2013           ThCh$		12-31-2012           ThCh$		12-31-2011           ThCh$
Energy purchases		(1,820,613,559)		(1,848,670,310)		(1,706,890,050)
Fuel consumption		(386,116,195)		(763,791,553)		(711,534,021)
Transportation costs		(399,680,014)		(474,178,392)		(394,723,050)
Costs from construction contracts		(159,283,676)		(151,969,334)		(179,051,253)
Other raw materials and consumables		(323,447,751)		(456,413,330)		(457,964,751)
Total		(3,089,141,195)		(3,695,022,919)		(3,450,163,125)

28. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS EXPENSE

Employee expenses recognized in profit or loss as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 are as follows:

Employee Benefits Expense	Balance at
	12-31-2013           ThCh$		12-31-2012           ThCh$		12-31-2011           ThCh$
Wages and salaries		(330,394,741)		(294,939,681)		(270,836,040)
Post-employment benefit obligations expense		(7,603,393)		(5,781,514)		(6,322,112)
Social security and other contributions		(121,856,590)		(105,827,908)		(92,118,945)
Other employee expenses		(5,827,374)		(2,630,733)		(2,476,680)
Total		(465,682,098)		(409,179,836)		(371,753,777)

29. DEPRECIATION, AMORTIZATION, AND IMPAIRMENT LOSSES

The detail of depreciation, amortization, and impairment losses recognized in profit or loss as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 is as follows:

	Balance at
	12-31-2013           ThCh$		12-31-2012           ThCh$		12-31-2011          ThCh$
Depreciation		(339,240,870)		(332,246,197)		(314,300,969)
Amortization		(96,232,389)		(102,237,537)		(102,563,962)
Subtotal		(435,473,259)		(434,483,734)		(416,864,931)
Reversal (losses) from impairment (*)		(74,877,924)		(42,612,727)		(136,119,203)
Total		(510,351,183)		(477,096,461)		(552,984,134)
(*) Impairment Losses	Balance at
	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
Financial assets (see Note 8c)		(33,554,637)		(32,680,894)		(18,611,224)
Intangible assets other than goodwill (see Note 14)		(28,662,952)		-		(14,379,823)
Infrastructure (see Note 16)		(12,660,335)		(12,578,098)		(106,449,843)
Reversal of provision for investment properties (see Note 17)		-		2,646,265		3,321,687
Total		(74,877,924)		(42,612,727)		(136,119,203)

F-112

30. OTHER EXPENSES

Other miscellaneous operating expenses as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 are as follows:

Other expenses	Balance at
	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
Other supplies and services		(62,324,990)		(62,086,206)		(92,387,278)
Professional, outsourced, and other services		(211,242,280)		(206,102,922)		(173,576,694)
Repairs and maintenance		(107,688,505)		(90,628,683)		(87,146,612)
Indemnities and fines		(20,798,430)		(26,119,464)		(14,733,175)
Taxes and charges		(29,108,704)		(22,776,753)		(89,135,440)
Insurance premiums		(27,520,496)		(22,725,136)		(19,954,912)
Leases and rental costs		(18,878,285)		(18,483,171)		(16,502,843)
Marketing, public relations, and advertising		(8,232,239)		(7,331,175)		(8,471,615)
Other supplies		(24,251,604)		(23,461,868)		(9,787,840)
Travel expenses		(6,101,368)		(7,854,709)		(6,291,401)
Environmental expenses		(3,951,788)		(4,988,760)		(4,705,293)
Total		(520,098,689)		(492,558,847)		(522,693,103)

31. OTHER GAINS (LOSSES)

Other gains (losses) as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 are as follows:

Other gains (losses)	Balance at
	12-31-2013   ThCh$		12-31-2012   ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
Sale of investments Cam Group and Synapsis		-		-		(10,733,882)
Sale of Charrua transmission lines		2,532,438		-		-
Land sales		9,800,912		9,191,493		3,766,963
Other assets		6,836,655		5,994,919		2,235,733
Total		19,170,005		15,186,412		(4,731,186)

F-113

32. FINANCIAL RESULTS

Financial income and costs as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 are as follows:

Financial Income	Balance at
	12-31-2013       ThCh$		12-31-2012             ThCh$		12-31-2011       ThCh$ ��
Income from cash and cash equivalents		101,020,849		60,910,774		75,537,918
Financial income on plan assets (Brazil)		200,526		2,252,542		5,207,551
Other financial income (1)		158,905,171		168,966,664		113,800,371
Total		260,126,546		232,129,980		194,545,840
Financial Costs	Balance at
	12-31-2013       ThCh$		12-31-2012             ThCh$		12-31-2011       ThCh$
Financial costs		(388,367,634)		(419,888,938)		(423,128,515)
Bank loans		(31,247,391)		(43,166,762)		(56,556,458)
Secured and unsecured obligations		(195,795,889)		(204,574,008)		(212,931,127)
Financial leasing		(1,892,614)		(3,281,822)		(2,937,215)
Valuation of financial derivatives		(18,626,994)		(19,030,050)		(23,215,129)
Financial provisions		(38,557,697)		(47,343,541)		(35,943,434)
Post-employment benefit obligations		(20,177,405)		(21,701,886)		(17,087,654)
Capitalized borrowing costs		30,325,539		26,477,369		35,945,738
Other financial costs		(112,395,183)		(107,268,238)		(110,403,236)
Gain (loss) from indexed assets and liabilities (*)		(9,414,755)		(12,756,868)		(25,206,927)
Foreign currency exchange differences (**)		(30,373,115)		(16,126,401)		20,124,044
Total Financial Costs		(428,155,504)		(448,772,207)		(428,211,398)
Total Financial Results		(168,028,958)		(216,642,227)		(233,665,558)

(1) Includes a financial update from the application of the Cost Monitoring Mechanism (MMC) in Edesur S.A. for ThCh$27,873,158 (ThCh$0 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011) and the financial update from the application of IFRIC 12 in Ampla and Coelce for ThCh$54,591,750 (ThCh$112,274,835 and ThCh$10,696,301 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively).

The effects on financial results from exchange differences and the application of indexed assets and liabilities originated from the following:

Results from Indexed Assets and Liabilities (*)	Balance at
	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
Cash and cash equivalents		-		19,201		5,798
Other financial assets		4,789,683		5,629,466		8,659,909
Other non-financial assets		13,669		1,425		1,912
Trade and other accounts receivable		273,757		181,103		63,114
Current tax assets and liabilities		2,950,060		2,515,491		2,073,581
Other financial liabilities (financial debt and derivative instruments		(17,493,502)		(21,849,406)		(35,864,236)
Trade and other accounts receivable		8,563		272,244		159,833
Other provisions		(12,564)		(163,246)		(281,472)
Other non-financial liabilities		55,579		636,854		(25,366)
Total		(9,414,755)		(12,756,868)		(25,206,927)
Exchange Differences (**)	Balance at
	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
Cash and cash equivalents		6,102,820		(2,517,811)		5,095,502
Other financial assets		36,522,047		6,021,281		6,146,671
Other non-financial assets		2,636,563		113,953		9,102,795
Trade and other accounts receivable		17,727,884		(1,712,212)		17,173,315
Current tax assets and liabilities		(18,772)		(4,910)		175,066
Other financial liabilities (financial debt and derivative instruments)		(76,388,115)		(18,554,479)		(11,293,585)
Trade and accounts payable		(13,918,059)		1,353,385		(5,476,285)
Other non-financial liabilities		(3,037,483)		(825,608)		(799,435)
Total		(30,373,115)		(16,126,401)		20,124,044

F-114

33. INCOME TAX

The following table reconciles income taxes resulting from applying the general current tax rate to “Net income before taxes” and the income tax expense recorded in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the 2013 and 2012 fiscal years:

Income Tax	Balance at
	12-31-2013                 ThCh$		12-31-2012                 ThCh$		12-31-2011                 ThCh$
Current tax expense		(575,430,884)		(436,116,770)		(451,979,823)
Tax benefit from tax assets not previously recognized (credits and/or benefits on current tax)		93,075,792		68,352,902		42,545,139
Adjustments to current tax from the previous period		(2,035,554)		627,769		(882,687)
Other current tax expense		(1,145,794)		(822,301)		(301,441)
Current tax expense, net		(485,536,440)		(367,958,400)		(410,618,812)
Deferred tax income (expense) from origination and reversal of temporary differences		(12,777,250)		(28,410,427)		(39,920,998)
Deferred tax (income) or expense from tax rate changes or new taxes (*)		(1,238,888)		(10,307,093)		148,137
Deferred tax expense from reductions in the value of, or reversal of, reductions in the value of deferred tax assets when their profitability is assessed		-		-		(2,197,116)
Other deferred tax expense		(4,615,207)		-		(2,880,528)
Deferred tax income (expense), net		(18,631,345)		(38,717,520)		(44,850,505)
Effect of changes in the tax status of the entity or its shareholders		-		-		-
Income tax income (expense)		(504,167,785)		(406,675,920)		(455,469,317)

Reconciliation of Tax Expense		12-31-2013 ThCh$			12-31-2012 ThCh$			12-31-2011 ThCh$
Income before Tax			1,617,568,531			1,299,688,888			1,327,421,440
Statutory tax rate and tax expense using statutory rate	(20.00%)		(323,513,705)	(20.00%)		(259,937,777)	(20.00%)		(265,598,126)
Tax effect of rates in other jurisdictions	(10.38%)		(166,561,065)	(10.52%)		(136,712,575)	(8.81%)		(117,057,673)
Tax effect of non-taxable revenues	10.73%		177,335,237	6.02%		78,244,330	4.21%		55,878,270
Tax effect of non-tax-deductible expenses	(7.52%)		(124,380,992)	(8.94%)		(116,144,791)	(8.07%)		(107,217,459)
Tax effect from change in tax rate    (*)	(0.07%)		(1,238,888)	(0.79%)		(10,307,093)	0.01%		148,137
Tax effect of over-provided tax in previous periods	(0.12%)		(2,035,554)	0.05%		627,769	(0.07%)		(882,687)
Current tax effects arising from investments	(3.86%)		(63,772,818)	2.89%		37,554,217	(1.56%)		(20,739,779)
Total adjustments to the tax rate and tax expense using statutory rate	(11.23%)		(180,654,080)	(11.29%)		(146,738,143)	(14.30%)		(189,871,191)
Total Effective Tax Rate and Income Tax (Expense) Benefit	(31.23%)		(504,167,785)	(31.29%)		(406,675,920)	(34.30%)		(455,469,317)

The principal temporary differences are detailed in Note 18a.

(*) a) On July 29, 2010, Law No. 20,455 was passed in Chile, “Modifying different laws to obtain funds to finance the reconstruction of the country.” This law, which was published in theDiario Oficial (Official Gazette) on July 31, 2010, included a temporary First Category tax increase for the 2011 and 2012 business years (to 20% and 18.5%, respectively), with a return to the 17% tax rate for 2013.

Then, on September 27, 2012, Law No. 20,630, which modifies Chilean tax law to finance education reform, was published in theDiario Oficial(Official Gazette). Among other changes, this law increased the First Category tax rate from 18.5% to 20% starting in the 2012 business year.

b) Law No. 1607/12 on tax reform was passed in Colombia on December 26, 2012, lowering the income tax rate to 25% (except for foreign companies, whose rate remains at 33%). It also creates a new 8% tax (9% from 2013 to 2015) whose tax base is the same as that used to calculate income tax, but without the inclusion of tax benefits or special deductions.

F-115

34. INFORMATION BY SEGMENT

34.1   Segmentation criteria

The Group’s activities are organized primarily around its core businesses: electric energy generation, transmission, and distribution. On that basis, the Group has established two major business lines.

In addition, segment information has been organized by the geographical areas in which the Group operates:

—  Chile

—  Argentina

—  Brazil

—  Peru

—  Colombia

Given that the Group’s corporate organization basically matches its business organization and, therefore, the segments organization, the following segment information is based on the financial information of the companies forming each segment.

The following tables present the segment information as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011.

F-116

34.2    Generation, Distribution, and Others

Line of Business	Generation						Distribution						Eliminations and Others						Total
ASSETS	12-31-2013                  ThCh$		12-31-2012                  ThCh$		12-31-2011                  ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
CURRENT ASSETS		1,156,230,094		959,618,767		1,171,298,010		1,211,608,943		961,835,357		1,001,053,127		1,528,376,244		368,734,806		306,372,623		3,896,215,281		2,290,188,930		2,478,723,760
Cash and cash equivalents		374,022,497		310,058,657		521,224,071		255,290,795		226,918,092		298,222,775		977,074,277		278,855,312		368,237,363		1,606,387,569		815,832,061		1,187,684,209
Other current financial assets		50,768,162		58,019,211		914,209		94,069,869		47,888,142		25,011		636,191,406		88,593,445		-		781,029,437		194,500,798		939,220
Other current non-financial assets		58,112,923		29,818,737		28,408,948		79,785,042		71,242,062		38,689,916		3,699,327		2,315,912		2,380,809		141,597,292		103,376,711		69,479,673
Trade and other current receivables		306,092,926		251,736,921		338,333,153		729,532,108		580,986,390		600,242,857		9,638,847		14,067,800		11,431,703		1,045,263,881		846,791,111		950,007,713
Accounts receivable from related companies		146,150,489		94,261,112		151,150,317		18,210,862		4,182,943		12,729,209		(130,341,777)		(50,873,773)		(101,967,040)		34,019,574		47,570,282		61,912,486
Inventories		53,275,768		59,387,769		49,278,530		19,671,824		12,859,884		15,392,449		4,835,163		4,315,432		5,663,862		77,782,755		76,563,085		70,334,841
Current tax assets		167,807,329		156,336,360		81,988,782		15,048,443		17,757,844		35,750,910		27,279,001		31,460,678		20,625,926		210,134,773		205,554,882		138,365,618
Non-current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
NON-CURRENT ASSETS		6,389,895,430		6,150,028,975		6,140,104,554		4,697,158,034		4,610,641,392		4,754,777,673		194,395,562		195,633,005		275,481,095		11,281,449,026		10,956,303,372		11,170,363,322
Other non-current financial assets		4,061,439		33,304,991		13,492,121		452,585,368		378,529,773		2,824,648		34,889,611		27,183,342		20,930,001		491,536,418		439,018,106		37,246,770
Other non-current non-financial assets		24,308,809		26,350,199		28,443,338		59,599,963		61,314,310		80,741,831		183,053		123,850		27,843		84,091,825		87,788,359		109,213,012
Non-current receivables		167,646,689		150,483,725		175,400,312		54,579,139		51,731,291		267,056,978		819,845		685,326		671,202		223,045,673		202,900,342		443,128,492
Non-current accounts receivable from related companies		-		-		(1,863,216)		-		99,044		117,946		-		(99,044)		1,745,270		-		-		-
Investments accounted for using the equity method		770,150,147		764,206,038		741,895,521		585,268,211		544,289,536		534,976,070		(1,107,337,478)		(1,093,978,229)		(1,082,085,874)		248,080,880		214,517,345		194,785,717
Intangible assets other than goodwill		51,842,981		49,048,386		35,181,256		1,091,372,309		1,138,047,176		1,417,280,397		30,345,071		14,906,949		14,219,326		1,173,560,361		1,202,002,511		1,466,680,979
Goodwill		100,096,198		101,747,086		106,385,017		97,464,272		102,245,125		121,299,383		1,174,759,858		1,187,681,741		1,240,622,708		1,372,320,328		1,391,673,952		1,468,307,108
Property, plant, and equipment		5,155,570,775		4,886,974,757		4,915,411,644		2,285,222,824		2,167,955,233		2,136,756,691		(6,994,874)		(5,006,419)		(6,259,488)		7,433,798,725		7,049,923,571		7,045,908,847
Investment property		-		-		-		-		-		-		44,877,049		46,922,970		38,055,889		44,877,049	��	46,922,970		38,055,889
Deferred tax assets		116,218,392		137,913,793		125,758,561		71,065,948		166,429,904		193,723,729		22,853,427		17,212,519		47,554,218		210,137,767		321,556,216		367,036,508
TOTAL ASSETS		7,546,125,524		7,109,647,742		7,311,402,564		5,908,766,977		5,572,476,749		5,755,830,800		1,722,771,806		564,367,811		581,853,718		15,177,664,307		13,246,492,302		13,649,087,082

F-117

Line of Business	Generation				Distribution				Eliminations and Others				Total
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY		12-31-2013 ThCh$	12-31-2012   ThCh$	12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$	12-31-2012   ThCh$	12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013   ThCh$	12-31-2012   ThCh$	12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$	12-31-2012   ThCh$	12-31-2011   ThCh$
CURRENT LIABILITIES		1,504,630,338	1,204,997,966	1,118,850,205		1,391,925,362	1,336,687,289	1,386,550,681		84,703,999	(194,954,530)	(83,366,862)		2,981,259,699	2,346,730,725	2,422,034,024
Other current financial liabilities		410,914,229	410,237,181	354,117,329		173,246,439	232,971,384	291,898,009		322,514,537	15,214,737	14,547,220		906,675,205	658,423,302	660,562,558
Trade and other current payables		485,923,015	354,778,875	364,735,796		833,574,667	771,682,773	768,546,333		100,094,650	68,390,102	80,106,184		1,419,592,332	1,194,851,750	1,213,388,313
Accounts payable to related companies		436,105,046	303,548,537	235,981,411		167,324,745	140,077,447	126,920,185		(399,017,521)	(293,366,477)	(202,542,912)		204,412,270	150,259,507	160,358,684
Other current provisions		45,046,839	38,320,326	35,516,956		63,787,200	44,316,361	43,227,192		9,748,619	7,094,015	20,445,238		118,582,658	89,730,702	99,189,386
Current tax liabilities		112,884,609	89,759,550	120,891,602		93,400,399	74,218,109	109,039,232		48,863,377	5,567,879	2,315,339		255,148,385	169,545,538	232,246,173
Other current non-financial liabilities		13,756,600	8,353,497	7,607,111		60,591,912	73,421,215	46,919,730		2,500,337	2,145,214	1,762,069		76,848,849	83,919,926	56,288,910
Liabilities associated with non-current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		-	-	-		-	-	-		-	-	-		-	-	-
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES		2,040,534,883	2,018,046,883	2,207,411,419		1,401,109,244	1,418,333,328	1,554,803,677		247,295,620	505,174,320	573,796,771		3,688,939,747	3,941,554,531	4,336,011,867
Other non-current financial liabilities		1,600,171,935	1,545,210,455	1,755,575,529		930,826,729	824,212,315	952,894,143		259,250,447	558,697,099	562,885,621		2,790,249,111	2,928,119,869	3,271,355,293
Other non-current payables		126,143	175,898	243,234		22,937,735	14,081,540	14,060,817		-	-	556		23,063,878	14,257,438	14,304,607
Non-current accounts payable to related companies		4,206,159	7,114,225	81,953		-	-	-		(4,206,159)	(7,114,225)	(81,953)		-	-	-
Other long-term provisions		33,574,202	26,347,451	20,833,139		154,230,523	143,882,430	181,079,091		6,162,628	6,345,154	103,609		193,967,353	176,575,035	202,015,839
Deferred tax liabilities		329,663,782	350,892,546	324,190,255		95,496,877	187,420,880	153,728,501		(29,673,769)	(37,185,729)	4,341,506		395,486,890	501,127,697	482,260,262
Non-current provisions for employee benefits		40,793,344	39,594,199	35,976,928		189,410,354	209,739,455	227,181,705		8,311,293	6,827,714	6,194,442		238,514,991	256,161,368	269,353,075
Other non-current non-financial liabilities		31,999,318	48,712,109	70,510,381		8,207,026	38,996,708	25,859,420		7,451,180	(22,395,693)	352,990		47,657,524	65,313,124	96,722,791
EQUITY		4,000,960,303	3,886,602,893	3,985,140,940		3,115,732,371	2,817,456,132	2,814,476,442		1,390,772,187	254,148,021	91,423,809		8,507,464,861	6,958,207,046	6,891,041,191
Equity attributable to shareholders of Enersis		4,000,960,303	3,886,602,893	3,985,140,940		3,115,732,371	2,817,456,132	2,814,476,442		1,390,772,187	254,148,021	91,423,809		6,168,554,253	3,893,798,572	3,895,728,606
Issued capital		1,459,295,724	1,488,171,918	1,752,890,037		865,828,224	829,508,479	1,010,886,630		3,344,156,777	507,202,438	61,106,168		5,669,280,725	2,824,882,835	2,824,882,835
Retained earnings		2,063,018,576	1,890,441,860	1,838,419,172		1,495,097,851	1,283,404,466	957,047,345		(744,482,130)	(752,567,485)	(562,497,637)		2,813,634,297	2,421,278,841	2,232,968,880
Share premium		206,510,282	206,008,557	-		4,193,997	4,180,489	-		(51,944,631)	(51,429,398)	158,759,648		158,759,648	158,759,648	158,759,648
Other reserves		272,135,721	301,980,558	393,831,731		750,612,299	700,362,698	846,542,467		(1,156,957,829)	550,942,466	434,055,630		(2,473,120,417)	(1,511,122,752)	(1,320,882,757)
Non-controlling interests		-	-	-		-	-	-		-	-	-		2,338,910,608	3,064,408,474	2,995,312,585
Total Liabilities and Equity		7,546,125,524	7,109,647,742	7,311,402,564		5,908,766,977	5,572,476,749	5,755,830,800		1,722,771,806	564,367,811	581,853,718		15,177,664,307	13,246,492,302	13,649,087,082

F-118

Line of Business	Generation						Distribution						Eliminations and Others						Total
STATEMENT OF  COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
REVENUES		2,441,120,267		2,678,261,961		2,579,800,800		4,404,479,994		4,423,281,052		4,414,990,381		(581,154,359)		(605,589,565)		(608,191,286)		6,264,445,902		6,495,953,448		6,386,599,895
Sales		2,377,325,332		2,612,956,454		2,561,971,518		3,901,681,181		4,182,008,807		4,155,335,255		(582,229,273)		(612,841,563)		(610,163,962)		5,696,777,240		6,182,123,698		6,107,142,811
Energy sales		2,165,668,341		2,482,754,540		2,478,817,528		3,552,382,184		3,819,198,791		3,798,629,330		(549,829,974)		(576,054,740)		(607,836,059)		5,168,220,551		5,725,898,591		5,669,610,799
Other sales		34,091,251		30,347		35,104		11,612,335		11,553,462		8,205,301		10,698,246		8,438,088		12,711,978		56,401,832		20,021,897		20,952,383
Other services rendered		177,565,740		130,171,567		83,118,886		337,686,662		351,256,554		348,500,624		(43,097,545)		(45,224,911)		(15,039,881)		472,154,857		436,203,210		416,579,629
Other operating income		63,794,935		65,305,507		17,829,282		502,798,813		241,272,245		259,655,126		1,074,914		7,251,998		1,972,676		567,668,662		313,829,750		279,457,084
SUPPLIES AND SERVICES		(1,009,702,135)		(1,449,084,420)		(1,194,858,034)		(2,673,379,981)		(2,867,319,759)		(2,890,439,370)		593,940,921		621,381,260		635,134,279		(3,089,141,195)		(3,695,022,919)		(3,450,163,125)
Energy purchases		(292,864,432)		(361,610,578)		(223,537,765)		(2,075,154,855)		(2,063,213,138)		(2,088,579,054)		547,405,728		576,153,406		605,226,769		(1,820,613,559)		(1,848,670,310)		(1,706,890,050)
Fuel consumption		(386,111,799)		(763,783,683)		(711,525,815)		-		-		-		(4,396)		(7,870)		(8,206)		(386,116,195)		(763,791,553)		(711,534,021)
Transportation expenses		(247,142,292)		(251,768,651)		(214,108,716)		(202,158,980)		(270,471,867)		(225,126,422)		49,621,258		48,062,126		44,512,088		(399,680,014)		(474,178,392)		(394,723,050)
Other miscellaneous supplies and services		(83,583,612)		(71,921,508)		(45,685,738)		(396,066,146)		(533,634,754)		(576,733,894)		(3,081,669)		(2,826,402)		(14,596,372)		(482,731,427)		(608,382,664)		(637,016,004)
CONTRIBUTION MARGIN		1,431,418,132		1,229,177,541		1,384,942,766		1,731,100,013		1,555,961,293		1,524,551,011		12,786,562		15,791,695		26,942,993		3,175,304,707		2,800,930,529		2,936,436,770
Infrastructure work		19,881,495		13,476,346		6,404,803		42,000,709		35,191,036		39,079,086		83,324		-		4,437,307		61,965,528		48,667,382		49,921,196
Employee expenses		(141,748,617)		(113,966,867)		(80,150,269)		(286,189,660)		(263,105,705)		(250,093,667)		(37,743,821)		(32,107,264)		(41,509,841)		(465,682,098)		(409,179,836)		(371,753,777)
Other fixed operating expenses		(131,303,219)		(117,716,347)		(138,178,677)		(392,931,388)		(377,970,540)		(382,173,622)		4,135,918		3,128,040		(2,340,804)		(520,098,689)		(492,558,847)		(522,693,103)
GROSS OPERATING RESULT		1,178,247,791		1,010,970,673		1,173,018,623		1,093,979,674		950,076,084		931,362,808		(20,738,017)		(13,187,529)		(12,470,345)		2,251,489,448		1,947,859,228		2,091,911,086
Depreciation and amortization		(220,709,881)		(209,061,131)		(194,915,189)		(212,656,348)		(223,100,209)		(220,147,908)		(2,107,030)		(2,322,394)		(1,801,834)		(435,473,259)		(434,483,734)		(416,864,931)
Impairment reversals (impairment losses)		(13,042,851)		(11,117,362)		(5,049,972)		(61,835,073)		(34,141,630)		(124,795,385)		-		2,646,265		(6,273,846)		(74,877,924)		(42,612,727)		(136,119,203)
OPERATING INCOME		944,495,059		790,792,180		973,053,462		819,488,253		692,834,245		586,419,515		(22,845,047)		(12,863,658)		(20,546,025)		1,741,138,265		1,470,762,767		1,538,926,952
FINANCIAL RESULT		(167,809,388)		(145,785,551)		(94,328,638)		(53,414,151)		(46,097,468)		(113,496,741)		53,194,581		(24,759,209)		(25,840,179)		(168,028,958)		(216,642,228)		(233,665,558)
Financial income		37,896,449		38,373,092		89,195,347		161,068,601		183,505,989		88,424,559		61,161,496		10,250,899		16,925,934		260,126,546		232,129,980		194,545,840
Financial expenses		(167,371,745)		(169,460,109)		(184,981,033)		(214,051,796)		(232,804,924)		(202,549,889)		(6,944,093)		(17,623,905)		(35,597,593)		(388,367,634)		(419,888,938)		(423,128,515)
Gain (loss) from indexed assets and liabilities		1,220,365		(785,468)		(5,484,279)		558,758		1,204,984		42,067		(11,193,878)		(13,176,384)		(19,764,715)		(9,414,755)		(12,756,868)		(25,206,927)
Foreign currency exchange differences		(39,554,457)		(13,913,066)		6,941,327		(989,714)		1,996,483		586,522		10,171,056		(4,209,818)		12,596,195		(30,373,115)		(16,126,401)		20,124,044
Positive		52,992,156		20,072,837		34,244,517		3,454,032		3,762,002		4,950,574		37,379,556		24,339,662		39,385,744		93,825,744		48,174,501		78,580,835
Negative		(92,546,613)		(33,985,903)		(27,303,190)		(4,443,746)		(1,765,519)		(4,364,052)		(27,208,500)		(28,549,480)		(26,789,549)		(124,198,859)		(64,300,902)		(58,456,791)
Share of profit (loss) from associates accounted for using the equity method		24,355,515		27,913,996		24,038,140		933,704		2,468,250		2,603,420		-		(310)		249,673		25,289,219		30,381,936		26,891,233
Gain (loss) from other investments		835,817		657,026		1,038,160		-		80,274		-		-		-		-		835,817		737,300		1,038,160
Gain (loss) from the sale of property, plant, and equipment		2,582,580		765,245		975,577		3,561,369		1,312,273		(230,613)		12,190,239		12,371,594		(6,514,311)		18,334,188		14,449,112		(5,769,347)
NET INCOME BEFORE TAX		804,459,583		674,342,896		904,776,701		770,569,175		650,597,574		475,295,581		42,539,773		(25,251,583)		(52,650,842)		1,617,568,531		1,299,688,888		1,327,421,440
Income tax		(229,566,686)		(210,602,693)		(252,107,318)		(203,441,100)		(210,877,855)		(198,395,852)		(71,159,999)		14,804,628		(4,966,147)		(504,167,785)		(406,675,920)		(455,469,317)
NET INCOME AFTER TAX FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		574,892,897		463,740,203		652,669,383		567,128,075		439,719,719		276,899,729		(28,620,226)		(10,446,955)		(57,616,989)		1,113,400,746		893,012,968		871,952,123
Net income from discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
NET INCOME		574,892,897		463,740,203		652,669,383		567,128,075		439,719,719		276,899,729		(28,620,226)		(10,446,955)		(57,616,989)		1,113,400,746		893,012,968		871,952,123
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO		574,892,897		463,740,203		652,669,383		567,128,075		439,719,719		276,899,729		(28,620,226)		(10,446,955)		(57,616,989)		1,113,400,746		893,012,968		871,952,123
Shareholders of Enersis																				658,514,150		377,350,522		375,471,254
Non-controlling interests																				454,886,596		515,662,446		496,480,869

F-119

34.3     Countries

Country	Chile						Argentina						Brazil						Colombia						Peru						Eliminations						Total
ASSETS	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
CURRENT ASSETS		2,084,089,603		778,287,483		1,075,927,343		324,887,994		140,651,609		198,804,567		814,810,111		742,319,957		680,639,175		592,888,884		517,570,258		433,026,278		230,431,271		154,280,243		138,640,932		(150,892,582)		(42,920,620)		(48,314,535)		3,896,215,281		2,290,188,930		2,478,723,760
Cash and cash equivalents		906,467,031		216,478,829		556,613,689		24,982,401		20,619,433		43,522,761		249,642,879		195,713,589		277,962,207		344,261,959		319,911,445		267,530,810		81,033,299		63,108,765		42,054,742		-		-		-		1,606,387,569		815,832,061		1,187,684,209
Other current financial assets		540,622,559		3,865		47,504		-		248,729		143,638		163,360,721		143,275,069		-		72,983,696		50,921,259		699,517		4,062,461		51,876		48,561		-		-		-		781,029,437		194,500,798		939,220
Other current non-financial assets		4,826,805		8,550,848		5,546,879		5,359,794		1,207,678		2,444,742		86,826,237		72,727,847		43,310,736		11,417,533		13,981,224		13,082,463		33,166,923		6,909,114		5,094,853		-		-		-		141,597,292		103,376,711		69,479,673
Trade and other current receivables		303,306,537		302,579,178		320,883,476		243,919,961		70,793,684		108,345,327		278,406,979		291,578,428		318,551,280		141,440,771		114,086,956		127,547,722		77,145,961		66,634,074		73,975,674		1,043,672		1,118,791		704,234		1,045,263,881		846,791,111		950,007,713
Accounts receivable from related companies		135,381,849		45,714,756		70,724,601		28,866,234		33,308,107		34,084,870		15,395,164		11,804,423		-		1,393,681		747,741		5,913,088		4,918,900		34,666		208,696		(151,936,254)		(44,039,411)		(49,018,769)		34,019,574		47,570,282		61,912,486
Inventories		22,015,023		35,822,896		30,429,643		8,201,936		6,392,567		4,921,951		2,519,460		659,321		1,266,810		19,869,367		16,405,994		16,713,554		25,176,969		17,282,307		17,002,883		-		-		-		77,782,755		76,563,085		70,334,841
Current tax assets		171,469,799		169,137,111		91,681,551		13,557,668		8,081,411		5,341,278		18,658,671		26,561,280		39,548,142		1,521,877		1,515,639		1,539,124		4,926,758		259,441		255,523		-		-		-		210,134,773		205,554,882		138,365,618
Non-current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
NON-CURRENT ASSETS		8,908,947,599		7,514,815,614		7,671,508,763		659,059,378		586,838,081		593,346,110		2,217,714,263		3,338,211,800		3,805,276,863		2,677,766,989		2,513,041,547		2,330,553,634		1,389,516,232		1,243,142,278		1,246,563,957		(4,571,555,435)		(4,239,745,948)		(4,476,886,005)		11,281,449,026		10,956,303,372		11,170,363,322
Other non-current financial assets		37,649,971		58,621,279		32,835,965		95,878		194,354		161,140		452,516,565		375,250,800		27,818		1,267,312		1,243,628		1,212,609		6,692		3,708,045		3,009,238		-		-		-		491,536,418		439,018,106		37,246,770
Other non-current non-financial assets		366,777		380,918		311,432		976,223		1,833,586		1,984,737		83,157,858		83,997,877		106,916,843		-		1,710,515		-		-		-		-		(409,033)		(134,537)		-		84,091,825		87,788,359		109,213,012
Non-current receivables		6,875,034		7,548,389		4,531,190		157,987,010		146,227,334		151,690,773		42,678,160		35,809,875		273,379,275		15,505,469		13,314,744		13,527,254		-		-		-		-		-		-		223,045,673		202,900,342		443,128,492
Non-current accounts receivable from related companies		-		5,712,830		6,179,892		-		-		-		36,001,623		32,432,608		44,861,006		-		-		-		-		-		-		(36,001,623)		(38,145,438)		(51,040,898)		-		-		-
Investments accounted for using the equity method		5,823,859,485		4,441,947,077		4,624,595,985		48,287,286		58,167,386		4,727,255		-		1,042,410,728		1,217,587,204		33,085,546		33,528,901		31,365,165		85,119,667		51,856,847		49,887,780		(5,742,271,104)		(5,413,393,594)		(5,733,377,672)		248,080,880		214,517,345		194,785,717
Intangible assets other than goodwill		37,570,805		37,962,229		40,287,096		2,736,208		3,460,809		3,649,971		1,060,733,391		1,104,062,844		1,375,676,408		43,583,416		43,868,608		43,764,781		28,936,541		12,648,021		3,302,723		-		-		-		1,173,560,361		1,202,002,511		1,466,680,979
Goodwill		2,298,609		2,298,608		2,298,608		1,574,810		1,902,217		2,357,592		95,223,794		100,004,647		119,058,905		5,213,756		5,194,342		5,126,657		8,287,322		8,703,399		10,361,690		1,259,722,037		1,273,570,739		1,329,103,656		1,372,320,328		1,391,673,952		1,468,307,108
Property, plant, and equipment		2,899,506,899		2,831,413,884		2,845,420,964		431,863,368		369,087,363		424,077,441		374,933,897		388,190,909		479,342,553		2,483,155,951		2,317,512,355		2,141,054,741		1,267,166,010		1,164,386,651		1,178,479,794		(22,827,400)		(20,667,591)		(22,466,646)		7,433,798,725		7,049,923,571		7,045,908,847
Investment property		44,877,049		46,922,970		38,055,889		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		44,877,049		46,922,970		38,055,889
Deferred tax assets		55,942,970		82,007,430		76,991,742		15,538,595		5,965,032		4,697,201		72,468,975		176,051,512		188,426,851		95,955,539		96,668,454		94,502,427		-		1,839,315		1,522,732		(29,768,312)		(40,975,527)		895,555		210,137,767		321,556,216		367,036,508
TOTAL ASSETS		10,993,037,202		8,293,103,097		8,747,436,106		983,947,372		727,489,690		792,150,677		3,032,524,374		4,080,531,757		4,485,916,038		3,270,655,873		3,030,611,805		2,763,579,912		1,619,947,503		1,397,422,521		1,385,204,889		(4,722,448,017)		(4,282,666,568)		(4,525,200,540)		15,177,664,307		13,246,492,302		13,649,087,082

F-120

Country	Chile						Argentina						Brazil						Colombia						Peru						Eliminations						Total
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
CURRENT LIABILITIES		976,567,203		710,362,585		630,608,050		765,661,046		592,608,749		494,783,567		507,823,387		444,716,883		650,237,150		504,585,033		442,299,732		476,157,074		236,388,951		192,966,044		170,828,751		(9,765,921)		(36,223,268)		(580,568)		2,981,259,699		2,346,730,725		2,422,034,024
Other current financial liabilities		447,215,392		233,128,692		76,829,743		185,774,593		156,782,528		105,336,295		67,179,349		111,001,976		288,730,920		135,583,922		96,374,184		124,642,295		70,921,949		61,135,922		65,023,305		-		-		-		906,675,205		658,423,302		660,562,558
Trade and other current payables		350,880,679		309,129,869		389,635,719		408,453,765		335,942,011		283,219,858		231,382,009		246,490,233		234,837,848		220,050,591		206,401,334		217,911,901		128,819,970		85,340,558		68,645,529		80,005,318		11,547,745		19,137,458		1,419,592,332		1,194,851,750		1,213,388,313
Accounts payable to related companies		25,743,837		94,690,434		50,881,631		74,601,162		32,357,914		45,686,586		148,963,775		31,861,534		34,092,017		43,984,648		38,029,441		52,825,714		890,087		1,091,197		1,068,536		(89,771,239)		(47,771,013)		(24,195,800)		204,412,270		150,259,507		160,358,684
Other current provisions		46,172,778		39,752,810		53,819,934		49,361,942		30,095,780		25,324,807		1,162,162		1,559,596		6,801,936		12,139,002		9,808,093		10,860		9,746,774		8,514,423		8,754,075		-		-		4,477,774		118,582,658		89,730,702		99,189,386
Current tax liabilities		105,209,644		31,025,160		56,915,482		18,177,602		10,649,219		12,379,051		37,120,694		35,085,220		67,476,356		82,533,687		83,398,892		74,996,825		12,106,758		9,387,047		20,478,459		-		-		-		255,148,385		169,545,538		232,246,173
Other current non-financial liabilities		1,344,873		2,635,620		2,525,541		29,291,982		26,781,297		22,836,970		22,015,398		18,718,324		18,298,073		10,293,183		8,287,788		5,769,479		13,903,413		27,496,897		6,858,847		-		-		-		76,848,849		83,919,926		56,288,910
Liabilities associated with non-current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES		1,082,782,610		1,511,764,865		1,795,375,211		131,441,625		113,903,928		206,938,488		805,923,465		860,959,079		929,216,917		1,209,708,575		1,069,131,734		910,782,376		525,169,451		484,376,415		527,947,698		(66,085,979)		(98,581,490)		(34,248,823)		3,688,939,747		3,941,554,531		4,336,011,867
Other non-current financial liabilities		834,174,804		1,208,350,892		1,538,473,627		19,263,284		23,630,252		113,544,053		511,762,232		465,777,075		515,352,311		1,097,771,137		945,721,006		782,142,214		327,277,654		284,640,644		321,843,088		-		-		-		2,790,249,111		2,928,119,869		3,271,355,293
Other non-current payables		-		-		-		126,137		175,794		1,146,930		22,937,741		14,081,644		13,157,677		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		23,063,878		14,257,438		14,304,607
Non-current accounts payable to related companies		-		-		-		36,317,667		37,013,568		34,248,823		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		(36,317,667)		(37,013,568)		(34,248,823)		-		-		-
Other long-term provisions		23,983,651		25,283,772		17,935,877		13,647,279		7,830,745		9,239,778		142,210,556		137,536,697		168,801,883		10,688,183		2,989,679		4,204,740		3,437,684		2,934,142		1,833,561		-		-		-		193,967,353		176,575,035		202,015,839
Deferred tax liabilities		176,873,577		203,371,102		186,884,544		18,926,410		10,812,791		13,419,881		21,675,958		113,029,606		67,691,941		23,901,959		21,874,223		10,917,433		183,877,298		193,015,503		203,346,463		(29,768,312)		(40,975,528)		-		395,486,890		501,127,697		482,260,262
Non-current provisions for employee benefits		43,056,906		40,094,917		35,289,267		9,640,282		7,014,199		7,627,051		106,313,626		127,516,473		149,353,832		77,347,296		79,299,002		77,082,925		2,156,881		2,236,777		-		-		-		-		238,514,991		256,161,368		269,353,075
Other non-current non-financial liabilities		4,693,672		34,664,182		16,791,896		33,520,566		27,426,579		27,711,972		1,023,352		3,017,584		14,859,273		-		19,247,824		36,435,064		8,419,934		1,549,349		924,586		-		(20,592,394)		-		47,657,524		65,313,124		96,722,791
EQUITY		8,933,687,389		6,070,975,647		6,321,452,845		86,844,701		20,977,013		90,428,622		1,718,777,522		2,774,855,795		2,906,461,971		1,556,362,265		1,519,180,339		1,376,640,462		858,389,101		720,080,062		686,428,440		(4,646,596,117)		(4,147,861,810)		(4,490,371,149)		8,507,464,861		6,958,207,046		6,891,041,191
Equity attributable to shareholders of Enersis		8,933,687,389		6,070,975,647		6,321,452,845		86,844,701		20,977,013		90,428,622		1,718,777,522		2,774,855,795		2,906,461,971		1,556,362,265		1,519,180,339		1,376,640,462		858,389,101		720,080,062		686,428,440		(4,646,596,117)		(4,147,861,810)		(4,490,371,149)		6,168,554,253		3,893,798,572		3,895,728,606
Issued capital		7,946,458,335		5,020,056,429		5,355,191,227		185,677,463		192,387,594		230,798,614		209,103,124		946,283,652		1,768,841,536		168,808,967		168,180,369		150,811,424		275,585,129		223,717,228		197,139,383		(3,116,352,293)		(3,725,742,437)		(4,877,899,349)		5,669,280,725		2,824,882,835		2,824,882,835
Retained earnings		3,330,989,884		2,695,003,084		2,719,465,398		(113,985,428)		(177,577,796)		(99,901,666)		315,847,482		640,153,933		459,494,106		657,299,536		632,034,321		125,770,175		218,840,148		135,999,423		72,384,456		(1,595,357,325)		(1,504,334,124)		(1,044,243,589)		2,813,634,297		2,421,278,841		2,232,968,880
Share premium		365,334,508		365,334,507		158,759,648		-		-		-		664,870,411		630,233,239		-		3,627,695		3,614,187		-		501,725		-		-		(875,574,691)		(840,422,285)		-		158,759,648		158,759,648		158,759,648
Other reserves		(2,709,095,338)		(2,009,418,373)		(1,911,963,428)		15,152,666		6,167,215		(40,468,326)		528,956,505		558,184,971		678,126,329		726,626,067		715,351,462		1,100,058,863		363,462,099		360,363,411		416,904,601		940,688,192		1,922,637,036		1,431,771,789		(2,473,120,417)		(1,511,122,752)		(1,320,882,757)
Non-controlling interests		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		2,338,910,608		3,064,408,474		2,995,312,585
Total Liabilities and Equity		10,993,037,202		8,293,103,097		8,747,436,106		983,947,372		727,489,690		792,150,677		3,032,524,374		4,080,531,757		4,485,916,038		3,270,655,873		3,030,611,805		2,763,579,912		1,619,947,503		1,397,422,521		1,385,204,889		(4,722,448,017)		(4,282,666,568)		(4,525,200,540)		15,177,664,307		13,246,492,302		13,649,087,082

F-121

Country	Chile						Argentina							Brazil						Colombia						Peru						Eliminations						Total
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$			12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
REVENUES		1.739.963.584		1.902.672.810		2.004.253.880		702.356.329		668.889.354			675.647.122		1.867.480.092		2.128.031.611		2.165.287.761		1.312.563.122		1.229.969.272		1.085.088.788		643.504.088		568.105.958		458.047.567		(1.421.313)		(1.715.557)		(1.725.223)		6.264.445.902		6.495.953.448		6.386.599.895
Sales		1.721.447.848		1.824.499.050		1.977.915.873		406.515.531		653.895.892			667.299.420		1.695.610.134		1.963.812.830		1.970.909.825		1.270.600.838		1.195.438.205		1.052.775.480		604.015.742		546.249.647		439.967.436		(1.412.853)		(1.771.926)		(1.725.223)		5.696.777.240		6.182.123.698		6.107.142.811
Energy sales		1.516.877.306		1.674.030.771		1.852.882.308		361.705.469		634.079.879			641.615.807		1.553.473.683		1.785.616.550		1.787.773.720		1.176.055.779		1.103.242.308		964.104.983		560.310.262		528.929.083		423.233.981		(201.948)		-		-		5.168.220.551		5.725.898.591		5.669.610.799
Other sales		37.365.915		11.203.229		11.280.912		361.681		412.885			-		6.569.786		5.800.382		6.072.128		3.280.645		2.566.899		3.103.227		8.823.805		38.502		565.295		-		-		(69.179)		56.401.832		20.021.897		20.952.383
Other services rendered		167.204.627		139.265.050		113.752.653		44.448.381		19.403.128			25.683.613		135.566.665		172.395.898		177.063.977		91.264.414		89.628.998		85.567.270		34.881.675		17.282.062		16.168.160		(1.210.905)		(1.771.926)		(1.656.044)		472.154.857		436.203.210		416.579.629
Other operating income		18.515.736		78.173.760		26.338.007		295.840.798		14.993.462			8.347.702		171.869.958		164.218.781		194.377.936		41.962.284		34.531.067		32.313.308		39.488.346		21.856.311		18.080.131		(8.460)		56.369		-		567.668.662		313.829.750		279.457.084
SUPPLIES AND SERVICES		(998.903.978)		(1.278.999.551)		(1.202.767.257)		(225.811.105)		(456.896.885)			(457.898.841)		(1.082.324.727)		(1.261.178.855)		(1.228.453.536)		(489.478.900)		(433.850.406)		(375.182.081)		(292.653.947)		(264.153.581)		(185.931.510)		31.462		56.359		70.100		(3.089.141.195)		(3.695.022.919)		(3.450.163.125)
Energy purchases		(568.466.950)		(681.252.650)		(697.903.048)		(186.778.094)		(188.141.869)			(153.569.548)		(616.825.105)		(602.540.949)		(587.111.958)		(282.064.565)		(219.666.504)		(179.570.130)		(170.440.992)		(158.288.518)		(88.735.366)		3.962.147		1.220.180		-		(1.820.613.559)		(1.848.670.310)		(1.706.890.050)
Fuel consumption		(211.612.174)		(385.360.528)		(319.628.442)		(25.889.830)		(255.215.278)			(283.048.981)		(51.277.737)		(31.481.376)		(35.498.349)		(34.870.502)		(36.215.949)		(23.946.682)		(62.465.952)		(55.518.422)		(49.411.567)		-		-		-		(386.116.195)		(763.791.553)		(711.534.021)
Transportation expenses		(182.821.321)		(190.345.945)		(150.540.034)		(3.021.027)		(4.645.155)			(9.143.907)		(72.787.402)		(142.758.291)		(107.475.644)		(114.719.080)		(115.622.940)		(111.348.162)		(22.369.037)		(19.580.741)		(16.215.303)		(3.962.147)		(1.225.320)		-		(399.680.014)		(474.178.392)		(394.723.050)
Other miscellaneous supplies and services		(36.003.533)		(22.040.428)		(34.695.733)		(10.122.154)		(8.894.583)			(12.136.405)		(341.434.483)		(484.398.239)		(498.367.585)		(57.824.753)		(62.345.013)		(60.317.107)		(37.377.966)		(30.765.900)		(31.569.274)		31.462		61.499		70.100		(482.731.427)		(608.382.664)		(637.016.004)
CONTRIBUTION MARGIN		741.059.606		623.673.259		801.486.623		476.545.224		211.992.469			217.748.281		785.155.365		866.852.756		936.834.225		823.084.222		796.118.866		709.906.707		350.850.141		303.952.377		272.116.057		(1.389.851)		(1.659.198)		(1.655.123)		3.175.304.707		2.800.930.529		2.936.436.770
Infrastructure work		14.831.058		11.267.275		11.168.239		21.102.202		12.470.077			12.146.533		13.877.942		15.741.611		18.130.297		8.810.875		6.497.515		6.245.798		3.343.451		2.690.904		2.230.329		-		-		-		61.965.528		48.667.382		49.921.196
Employee expenses		(123.792.285)		(104.960.338)		(101.436.399)		(154.686.549)		(119.207.683)			(106.287.626)		(100.646.527)		(106.756.270)		(110.708.252)		(51.593.413)		(47.181.965)		(45.683.300)		(34.963.324)		(31.073.580)		(7.638.200)		-		-		-		(465.682.098)		(409.179.836)		(371.753.777)
Other fixed operating expenses		(116.287.888)		(109.459.496)		(103.258.819)		(138.909.308)		(114.875.019)			(88.827.726)		(147.251.808)		(154.523.039)		(161.072.702)		(75.777.792)		(74.513.810)		(138.659.752)		(43.261.744)		(40.846.681)		(33.100.304)		1.389.851		1.659.198		2.226.200		(520.098.689)		(492.558.847)		(522.693.103)
GROSS OPERATING RESULT		515.810.491		420.520.700		607.959.644		204.051.569		(9.620.156)			34.779.462		551.134.972		621.315.058		683.183.568		704.523.892		680.920.606		531.809.453		275.968.524		234.723.020		233.607.882		-		-		571.077		2.251.489.448		1.947.859.228		2.091.911.086
											��
Depreciation and amortization		(121.138.443)		(113.054.058)		(107.693.768)		(39.649.324)		(37.553.574)			(30.461.556)		(111.980.732)		(118.997.483)		(124.654.759)		(99.481.692)		(104.303.331)		(99.446.570)		(64.854.394)		(62.377.398)		(57.605.062)		1.631.326		1.802.110		2.996.784		(435.473.259)		(434.483.734)		(416.864.931)
Impairment reversal (impairment losses)		(8.212.948)		(15.012.980)		(10.064.150)		(7.740.545)		(1.373.527)			(107.790.180)		(51.248.898)		(24.644.075)		(6.898.659)		(160.634)		(194.686)		(330.018)		(7.514.899)		(1.387.459)		(1.614.116)		-		-		(9.422.080)		(74.877.924)		(42.612.727)		(136.119.203)
OPERATING INCOME		386.459.100		292.453.662		490.201.726		156.661.700		(48.547.257)			(103.472.274)		387.905.342		477.673.500		551.630.150		604.881.566		576.422.589		432.032.865		203.599.231		170.958.163		174.388.704		1.631.326		1.802.110		(5.854.219)		1.741.138.265		1.470.762.767		1.538.926.952
FINANCIAL RESULT		(43.026.391)		(91.641.920)		(76.593.053)		(94.354.564)		(64.962.488)			(31.563.414)		34.677.521		30.905.320		(32.405.059)		(50.091.563)		(65.263.038)		(75.645.888)		(26.555.488)		(28.142.657)		(22.714.456)		11.321.527		2.462.555		5.256.312		(168.028.958)		(216.642.228)		(233.665.558)
Financial income		56.783.528		24.927.472		34.709.492		37.262.480		8.339.316			13.314.838		146.393.325		182.577.796		134.692.861		18.522.711		13.289.208		11.254.296		3.522.291		5.284.506		2.723.717		(2.357.789)		(2.288.318)		(2.149.364)		260.126.546		232.129.980		194.545.840
Financial expenses		(102.213.764)		(97.012.353)		(90.794.386)		(73.869.756)		(57.873.835)			(36.394.214)		(120.173.373)		(155.317.783)		(186.433.592)		(68.989.288)		(78.359.842)		(86.687.155)		(25.479.239)		(33.613.441)		(24.968.532)		2.357.786		2.288.316		2.149.364		(388.367.634)		(419.888.938)		(423.128.515)
Gain (loss) from indexed assets and liabilities		(9.414.755)		(12.756.868)		(25.206.927)		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		(9.414.755)		(12.756.868)		(25.206.927)
Foreign currency exchange differences		11.818.600		(6.800.170)		4.698.768		(57.747.288)		(15.427.969)			(8.484.038)		8.457.569		3.645.307		19.335.672		375.014		(192.404)		(213.029)		(4.598.540)		186.278		(469.641)		11.321.530		2.462.557		5.256.312		(30.373.115)		(16.126.401)		20.124.044
Positive		68.426.745		32.676.794		51.254.300		19.539.712		9.384.231			6.006.240		14.637.824		9.445.578		29.865.459		843.353		731.896		737.326		4.238.355		934.728		702.589		(13.860.245)		(4.998.726)		(9.985.079)		93.825.744		48.174.501		78.580.835
Negative		(56.608.145)		(39.476.964)		(46.555.532)		(77.287.000)		(24.812.200)			(14.490.278)		(6.180.255)		(5.800.271)		(10.529.787)		(468.339)		(924.300)		(950.355)		(8.836.895)		(748.450)		(1.172.230)		25.181.775		7.461.283		15.241.391		(124.198.859)		(64.300.902)		(58.456.791)
Share of the profit (loss) from associates accounted for using the equity method		24.211.200		27.938.403		24.038.106		144.312		(24.407)			250.141		3		-		-		933.704		2.467.940		2.602.952		-		-		-		-		-		34		25.289.219		30.381.936		26.891.233
Gain (loss) from other investments		110.144		158.287		1.053.408		725.673		579.029			498.877		-		-		-		-		(16)		-		-		-		-		-		-		(514.125)		835.817		737.300		1.038.160
Gain (loss) on the sale of property, plant, and equipment		14.460.353		12.212.146		(6.039.997)		7.854		2.032			-		2.761.811		1.983.259		-		381.011		(212.781)		(147.701)		723.159		464.456		418.351		-		-		-		18.334.188		14.449.112		(5.769.347)
NET INCOME BEFORE TAX		382.214.406		241.120.578		432.660.190		63.184.975		(112.953.091)			(134.286.670)		425.344.677		510.562.079		519.225.091		556.104.718		513.414.694		358.842.228		177.766.902		143.279.962		152.092.599		12.952.853		4.264.665		(1.111.998)		1.617.568.531		1.299.688.888		1.327.421.440
Income tax		(152.739.606)		(55.359.053)		(106.818.787)		(19.375.905)		(2.938.736)			(34.044.480)		(98.554.882)		(131.150.308)		(129.039.820)		(181.812.587)		(167.411.904)		(140.865.893)		(51.684.805)		(49.815.919)		(44.223.034)		-		-		(477.303)		(504.167.785)		(406.675.920)		(455.469.317)
NET INCOME AFTER TAX FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		229.474.800		185.761.525		325.841.403		43.809.070		(115.891.827)			(168.331.150)		326.789.795		379.411.771		390.185.271		374.292.131		346.002.790		217.976.335		126.082.097		93.464.043		107.869.565		12.952.853		4.264.665		(1.589.301)		1.113.400.746		893.012.968		871.952.123
Net income from discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
NET INCOME		229.474.800		185.761.525		325.841.403		43.809.070		(115.891.827)			(168.331.150)		326.789.795		379.411.771		390.185.271		374.292.131		346.002.790		217.976.335		126.082.097		93.464.043		107.869.565		12.952.853		4.264.665		(1.589.301)		1.113.400.746		893.012.968		871.952.123
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO		229.474.800		185.761.525		325.841.403		43.809.070		(115.891.827)			(168.331.150)		326.789.795		379.411.771		390.185.271		374.292.131		346.002.790		217.976.335		126.082.097		93.464.043		107.869.565		12.952.853		4.264.665		(1.589.301)		1.113.400.746		893.012.968		871.952.123
Shareholders of Enersis																																							658.514.150		377.350.522		375.471.254
Non-controlling interests																																							454.886.596		515.662.446		496.480.869

F-122

34.4 Generation and Distribution by Country

a) Generation

Line of Business	Generation
Country	Chile						Argentina						Brazil						Colombia						Peru						Eliminations						Total
ASSETS	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
CURRENT ASSETS		511,796,884		383,623,404		540,451,080		107,811,492		65,350,914		113,950,708		139,953,310		188,095,512		229,070,896		321,118,495		285,719,119		239,044,005		137,682,054		80,363,358		75,650,050		(62,132,141)		(43,533,540)		(26,868,729)		1,156,230,094		959,618,767		1,171,298,010
Cash and cash equivalents		56,780,323		6,256,263		198,775,572		16,276,593		6,613,187		22,383,610		34,172,561		74,132,078		131,040,180		227,781,003		187,772,861		136,260,140		39,012,017		35,284,268		32,764,569		-		-		-		374,022,497		310,058,657		521,224,071
Other current financial assets		23,956,079		-		47,504		-		-		143,638		26,631,685		32,899,426		-		59,041		25,067,909		674,506		121,357		51,876		48,561		-		-		-		50,768,162		58,019,211		914,209
Other current non-financial assets		2,104,085		5,343,846		2,504,741		4,163,710		224,900		1,197,748		12,892,720		12,492,705		14,283,730		7,825,842		7,515,740		7,964,428		31,126,566		4,241,546		2,458,301		-		-		-		58,112,923		29,818,737		28,408,948
Trade and other current receivables		145,157,387		142,361,331		157,809,488		48,084,728		19,901,491		54,090,162		30,064,544		34,854,848		63,940,752		54,561,960		35,378,529		45,507,596		27,945,880		18,439,139		16,985,155		278,427		801,583		-		306,092,926		251,736,921		338,333,153
Accounts receivable from related companies		116,673,985		52,329,038		79,160,315		28,288,101		32,524,660		33,441,555		33,710,120		29,309,511		19,803,730		13,527,398		15,211,112		35,104,241		16,361,453		9,221,914		10,509,205		(62,410,568)		(44,335,123)		(26,868,729)		146,150,489		94,261,112		151,150,317
Inventories		14,662,964		30,054,549		22,853,273		3,015,290		3,158,460		1,783,282		24,335		25,149		2,504		15,841,374		13,257,329		11,993,970		19,731,805		12,892,282		12,645,501		-		-		-		53,275,768		59,387,769		49,278,530
Current tax assets		152,462,061		147,278,377		79,300,187		7,983,070		2,928,216		910,713		2,457,345		4,381,795		-		1,521,877		1,515,639		1,539,124		3,382,976		232,333		238,758		-		-		-		167,807,329		156,336,360		81,988,782
Non-current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
NON-CURRENT ASSETS		4,010,150,837		3,806,238,338		3,836,444,494		328,620,769		282,190,205		319,979,207		466,450,794		484,097,928		600,244,367		1,712,544,281		1,563,308,503		1,393,219,292		850,389,930		786,613,843		812,558,136		(978,261,181)		(772,419,842)		(822,340,942)		6,389,895,430		6,150,028,975		6,140,104,554
Other non-current financial assets		2,759,880		31,436,192		11,908,606		34,697		108,154		161,140		1		1		-		1,260,169		1,236,511		1,205,585		6,692		524,133		216,790		-		-		-		4,061,439		33,304,991		13,492,121
Other non-current non-financial assets		41,506		41,505		54,246		495,445		1,252,853		1,099,011		24,179,550		24,553,260		27,290,081		-		635,776		-		-		-		-		(407,692)		(133,195)		-		24,308,809		26,350,199		28,443,338
Non-current receivables		-		-		160,518		156,318,116		144,560,890		150,312,091		7,818,925		2,908,137		21,685,968		3,509,648		3,014,698		3,241,735		-		-		-		-		-		-		167,646,689		150,483,725		175,400,312
Non-current accounts receivable from related companies		-		5,712,830		6,179,892		-		-		-		31,832,066		29,806,493		42,997,790		-		-		-		-		-		-		(31,832,066)		(35,519,323)		(51,040,898)		-		-		(1,863,216)
Investments accounted for using the equity method		1,739,823,985		1,523,247,036		1,537,616,848		2,402,684		2,743,725		3,428,479		9,466,233		9,072,881		10,801,536		-		-		-		49,498,978		51,856,848		49,887,780		(1,031,041,733)		(822,714,452)		(859,839,122)		770,150,147		764,206,038		741,895,521
Intangible assets other than goodwill		14,551,065		12,617,056		10,854,274		91,877		126,534		176,228		2,556,250		2,647,693		1,410,902		24,751,366		23,938,624		22,281,991		9,892,423		9,718,479		457,861		-		-		-		51,842,981		49,048,386		35,181,256
Goodwill		-		-		-		1,574,810		1,902,217		2,357,592		-		-		-		5,213,756		5,194,342		5,126,657		8,287,322		8,703,399		10,361,690		85,020,310		85,947,128		88,539,078		100,096,198		101,747,086		106,385,017
Property, plant, and equipment		2,249,838,283		2,209,465,781		2,247,634,237		152,164,545		125,530,800		157,747,465		352,672,949		368,075,606		456,994,530		1,618,190,483		1,469,930,901		1,302,924,129		782,704,515		713,971,669		750,111,283		-		-		-		5,155,570,775		4,886,974,757		4,915,411,644
Investment property		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Deferred tax assets		3,136,118		23,717,938		22,035,873		15,538,595		5,965,032		4,697,201		37,924,820		47,033,857		39,063,560		59,618,859		59,357,651		58,439,195		-		1,839,315		1,522,732		-		-		-		116,218,392		137,913,793		125,758,561
TOTAL ASSETS		4,521,947,721		4,189,861,742		4,376,895,574		436,432,261		347,541,119		433,929,915		606,404,104		672,193,440		829,315,263		2,033,662,776		1,849,027,622		1,632,263,297		988,071,984		866,977,201		888,208,186		(1,040,393,322)		(815,953,382)		(849,209,671)		7,546,125,524		7,109,647,742		7,311,402,564

F-123

Line of Business	Generation
Country	Chile						Argentina						Brazil						Colombia						Peru						Eliminations						Total
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
CURRENT LIABILITIES		668,592,085		600,267,301		388,462,676		318,877,246		216,250,046		184,089,684		154,314,125		169,123,436		223,439,239		229,570,428		179,614,548		220,413,976		121,170,978		80,997,177		77,444,300		12,105,476		(41,254,542)		25,000,330		1,504,630,338		1,204,997,966	1,118,850,205
Other current financial liabilities		124,569,707		217,913,907		62,256,172		177,557,360		129,148,163		82,987,086		7,263,176		6,224,991		62,027,186		65,753,442		29,534,134		113,869,956		35,770,544		27,415,986		32,976,929		-		-		-		410,914,229		410,237,181	354,117,329
Trade and other current payables		218,072,454		149,795,330		194,987,161		54,317,047		45,273,595		47,852,899		43,068,218		37,543,805		47,171,805		71,066,492		71,999,845		50,897,328		69,660,662		41,946,209		23,834,560		29,738,142		8,220,091		(7,957)		485,923,015		354,778,875	364,735,796
Accounts payable to related companies		256,312,820		185,220,102		71,396,335		73,534,329		31,066,357		43,569,836		94,607,913		111,905,008		81,664,568		28,331,191		23,917,636		14,328,510		951,459		914,067		13,875		(17,632,666)		(49,474,633)		25,008,287		436,105,046		303,548,537	235,981,411
Other current provisions		27,648,806		23,476,072		28,764,460		1,777,176		1,564,413		3,901,399		-		-		-		12,139,002		9,808,093		10,860		3,481,855		3,471,748		2,840,237		-		-		-		45,046,839		38,320,326	35,516,956
Current tax liabilities		41,456,080		23,323,179		29,576,414		6,809,177		7,807,388		5,362,401		6,898,694		11,488,571		30,425,114		50,014,588		42,623,796		40,779,406		7,706,070		4,516,616		14,748,267		-		-		-		112,884,609		89,759,550	120,891,602
Other current non-financial liabilities		532,218		538,711		1,482,134		4,882,157		1,390,130		416,063		2,476,124		1,961,061		2,150,566		2,265,713		1,731,044		527,916		3,600,388		2,732,551		3,030,432		-		-		-		13,756,600		8,353,497	7,607,111
Liabilities associated with non-current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES		771,344,735		871,530,756		1,169,145,498		104,952,969		95,913,004		165,441,384		26,868,554		37,449,700		58,875,184		864,631,943		757,392,281		530,859,723		304,848,189		282,137,010		317,338,453		(32,111,507)		(26,375,868)		(34,248,823)		2,040,534,883		2,018,046,883	2,207,411,419
Other non-current financial liabilities		574,924,357		649,653,793		975,588,006		12,954,207		20,701,104		87,602,569		19,711,499		26,586,073		36,725,221		828,381,968		711,308,825		486,420,793		164,199,904		136,960,660		169,238,940		-		-		-		1,600,171,935		1,545,210,455	1,755,575,529
Other non-current payables		-		-		-		126,137		175,794		241,287		6		104		1,947		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		126,143		175,898	243,234
Non-current accounts payable to related companies		-		-		81,953		36,317,666		37,013,568		34,248,823		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		(32,111,507)		(29,899,343)		(34,248,823)		4,206,159		7,114,225	81,953
Other long-term provisions		17,426,844		16,545,029		10,251,812		5,389,574		-		-		6,795,372		6,753,472		8,596,721		738,840		316,755		316,576		3,223,572		2,732,195		1,668,030		-		-		-		33,574,202		26,347,451	20,833,139
Deferred tax liabilities		159,958,131		183,446,893		159,800,466		18,926,410		10,812,791		13,419,881		-		2,860,251		4,538,425		13,991,943		12,001,108		-		136,787,298		141,771,503		146,431,483		-		-		-		329,663,782		350,892,546	324,190,255
Non-current provisions for employee benefits		15,360,428		14,482,504		11,806,507		3,276,309		2,382,287		2,216,852		-		-		-		21,519,192		22,056,756		21,953,569		637,415		672,652		-		-		-		-		40,793,344		39,594,199	35,976,928
Other non-current non-financial liabilities		3,674,975		7,402,537		11,616,754		27,962,666		24,827,460		27,711,972		361,677		1,249,800		9,012,870		-		11,708,837		22,168,785		-		-		-		-		3,523,475		-		31,999,318		48,712,109	70,510,381
EQUITY		3,082,010,901		2,718,063,685		2,819,287,400		12,602,046		35,378,069		84,398,847		425,221,425		465,620,304		547,000,840		939,460,405		912,020,793		880,989,598		562,052,817		503,843,014		493,425,433		(1,020,387,291)		(748,322,972)		(839,961,178)		4,000,960,303		3,886,602,893	3,985,140,940
Equity attributable to shareholders of Enersis		3,082,010,901		2,718,063,685		2,819,287,400		12,602,046		35,378,069		84,398,847		425,221,425		465,620,304		547,000,840		939,460,405		912,020,793		880,989,598		562,052,817		503,843,014		493,425,433		(1,020,387,291)		(748,322,972)		(839,961,178)		4,000,960,303		3,886,602,893	3,985,140,940
Issued capital		1,863,803,648		1,781,799,632		1,990,459,492		75,661,025		57,453,398		92,185,037		111,945,652		170,138,583		204,171,117		165,215,801		164,600,583		142,906,410		201,643,413		186,073,314		164,297,758		(958,973,815)		(871,893,592)		(841,129,777)		1,459,295,724		1,488,171,918	1,752,890,037
Retained earnings		1,446,722,329		1,093,192,232		1,131,415,199		(64,632,839)		(13,873,002)		(7,554,043)		171,051,337		176,225,150		202,644,366		543,834,488		524,280,383		128,464,532		134,872,574		75,744,989		70,760,796		(168,829,313)		34,872,108		312,688,322		2,063,018,576		1,890,441,860	1,838,419,172
Share premium		206,008,557		206,008,557		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		501,725		-		-		-		-		-		206,510,282		206,008,557	-
Treasury shares		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Other equity interests		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Other reserves		(434,523,633)		(362,936,736)		(302,587,291)		1,573,860		(8,202,327)		(232,147)		142,224,436		119,256,571		140,185,357		230,410,116		223,139,827		609,618,656		225,035,105		242,024,711		258,366,879		107,415,837		88,698,512		(311,519,723)		272,135,721		301,980,558	393,831,731
Non-controlling interests		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
Total Liabilities and Equity		4,521,947,721		4,189,861,742		4,376,895,574		436,432,261		347,541,119		433,929,915		606,404,104		672,193,440		829,315,263		2,033,662,776		1,849,027,622		1,632,263,297		988,071,984		866,977,201		888,208,186		(1,040,393,322)		(815,953,382)		(849,209,671)		7,546,125,524		7,109,647,742	7,311,402,564

F-124

Line of Business	Generation
Country	Chile						Argentina						Brazil						Colombia
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	12-31-2013		12-31-2012		12-31-2011		12-31-2013		12-31-2012		12-31-2011		12-31-2013		12-31-2012		12-31-2011		12-31-2013		12-31-2012		12-31-2011
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
REVENUES		962,878,821		1,107,116,945		1,137,769,807		173,767,877		347,671,353		395,296,464		349,612,268		361,855,124		309,049,119		639,460,200		580,151,107		498,568,875
Sales		961,131,300		1,046,837,045		1,125,358,093		138,071,696		344,621,942		395,107,435		349,355,959		361,855,124		306,693,874		634,800,723		579,490,649		496,505,095
Energy sales		860,581,278		995,304,342		1,105,983,558		109,113,647		341,123,404		389,963,331		286,300,194		294,359,410		253,753,923		634,181,459		578,673,437		495,453,014
Other sales		25,273,582		30,347		35,104		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Other services rendered		75,276,440		51,502,356		19,339,431		28,958,049		3,498,538		5,144,104		63,055,765		67,495,714		52,939,951		619,264		817,212		1,052,081
Other operating income		1,747,521		60,279,900		12,411,714		35,696,181		3,049,411		189,029		256,309		-		2,355,245		4,659,477		660,458		2,063,780
SUPPLIES AND SERVICES		(494,891,536)		(753,997,627)		(601,671,634)		(56,031,618)		(281,490,845)		(315,717,397)		(141,838,915)		(131,313,182)		(55,607,090)		(204,521,337)		(171,182,696)		(134,977,823)
Energy purchases		(124,419,095)		(219,329,602)		(156,532,305)		(18,314,109)		(13,485,770)		(13,740,208)		(51,759,989)		(52,245,893)		(9,943,885)		(87,695,910)		(49,214,202)		(29,508,762)
Fuel consumption		(211,607,777)		(385,352,659)		(319,620,236)		(25,889,831)		(255,215,278)		(283,048,981)		(51,277,737)		(31,481,375)		(35,498,349)		(34,870,502)		(36,215,949)		(23,946,682)
Transportation expenses		(149,447,929)		(153,277,780)		(118,743,579)		(1,826,164)		(4,074,257)		(8,165,583)		(9,695,879)		(16,161,314)		(16,353,299)		(59,719,073)		(57,311,261)		(54,452,560)
Other miscellaneous supplies and services		(9,416,735)		3,962,414		(6,775,514)		(10,001,514)		(8,715,540)		(10,762,625)		(29,105,310)		(31,424,600)		6,188,443		(22,235,852)		(28,441,284)		(27,069,819)
CONTRIBUTION MARGIN		467,987,285		353,119,318		536,098,173		117,736,259		66,180,508		79,579,067		207,773,353		230,541,942		253,442,029		434,938,863		408,968,411		363,591,052
Infrastructure work		10,625,755		8,472,679		3,954,056		2,994,025		-		-		798,621		713,161		244,254		5,001,430		4,133,486		2,187,900
Employee expenses		(63,318,333)		(51,313,882)		(38,352,370)		(33,097,900)		(22,442,565)		(19,020,797)		(12,441,385)		(11,545,260)		(12,425,160)		(18,284,458)		(15,935,879)		(13,009,393)
Other fixed operating expenses		(60,037,993)		(51,725,559)		(42,002,591)		(19,974,007)		(14,644,907)		(9,996,620)		(9,947,279)		(12,503,249)		(10,652,946)		(20,175,229)		(21,038,904)		(61,997,033)
GROSS OPERATING RESULT		355,256,714		258,552,556		459,697,268		67,658,377		29,093,036		50,561,650		186,183,310		207,206,594		230,608,177		401,480,606		376,127,114		290,772,526
Depreciation and amortization		(90,062,966)		(82,066,125)		(78,093,376)		(26,740,217)		(23,217,258)		(16,647,907)		(24,882,875)		(26,462,161)		(26,089,510)		(37,628,154)		(38,421,392)		(37,360,006)
Impairment reversal (impairment losses)		64,137		(11,027,857)		(4,119,978)		(5,788,835)		-		-		(695,613)		-		(1,025,578)		76,227		(44,846)		95,584
Operating Income		265,257,885		165,458,574		377,483,914		35,129,325		5,875,778		33,913,743		160,604,822		180,744,433		203,493,089		363,928,679		337,660,876		253,508,104
FINANCIAL RESULT		(62,651,050)		(63,763,352)		(44,953,016)		(85,446,574)		(37,367,253)		(24,064,353)		15,184,609		9,501,946		31,870,959		(26,946,483)		(38,974,600)		(44,412,198)
Financial income		3,536,277		5,972,775		15,272,137		4,244,643		2,841,601		6,318,260		19,932,500		24,959,636		62,448,962		11,265,048		5,210,427		6,440,538
Financial expenses		(77,521,638)		(67,876,690)		(55,472,876)		(31,560,337)		(23,674,870)		(20,995,238)		(12,677,600)		(18,097,957)		(49,265,315)		(38,653,714)		(43,917,815)		(50,600,130)
Gain (loss) from indexed assets and liabilities		1,220,365		(785,468)		(5,484,279)		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign currency exchange differences		10,113,946		(1,073,969)		732,002		(58,130,880)		(16,533,984)		(9,387,375)		7,929,709		2,640,267		18,687,312		442,183		(267,212)		(252,606)
Positive		26,215,267		7,585,199		14,059,103		18,008,940		7,926,758		4,805,473		13,724,429		8,385,976		27,309,335		740,084		407,595		370,895
Negative		(16,101,321)		(8,659,168)		(13,327,101)		(76,139,820)		(24,460,742)		(14,192,848)		(5,794,720)		(5,745,709)		(8,622,023)		(297,901)		(674,807)		(623,501)
Share of the profit (loss) from associates accounted for using the equity method		24,211,203		27,938,714		24,038,140		144,312		(24,718)		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Gain (loss) from other investments		110,144		158,288		539,283		725,673		498,738		498,877		-		-		-		-		-		-
Gain (loss) on the sale of property, plant, and equipment		2,446,539		13,828		478,619		7,854		2,032		-		-		-		-		310,238		187,055		70,187
NET INCOME BEFORE TAX		229,374,721		129,806,052		357,586,940		(49,439,410)		(31,015,423)		10,348,267		175,789,431		190,246,379		235,364,048		337,292,434		298,873,331		209,166,093
Income tax		(58,588,721)		(48,515,925)		(75,808,716)		(7,294,916)		(5,394,465)		(21,796,346)		(25,337,026)		(27,804,757)		(46,012,835)		(106,503,562)		(97,612,299)		(80,740,375)
NET INCOME AFTER TAX FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		170,786,000		81,290,127		281,778,224		(56,734,326)		(36,409,888)		(11,448,079)		150,452,405		162,441,622		189,351,213		230,788,872		201,261,032		128,425,718
Net income from discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
NET INCOME		170,786,000		81,290,127		281,778,224		(56,734,326)		(36,409,888)		(11,448,079)		150,452,405		162,441,622		189,351,213		230,788,872		201,261,032		128,425,718
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO		170,786,000		81,290,127		281,778,224		(56,734,326)		(36,409,888)		(11,448,079)		150,452,405		162,441,622		189,351,213		230,788,872		201,261,032		128,425,718
Shareholders of Enersis
Non-controlling interests

Generation
Peru						Eliminations						Total
12-31-2013		12-31-2012		12-31-2011		12-31-2013		12-31-2012		12-31-2011		12-31-2013		12-31-2012		12-31-2011
ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
	315,886,096		282,124,274		239,841,441		(484,995)		(656,842)		(724,906)		2,441,120,267		2,678,261,961		2,579,800,800
	294,442,189		280,813,676		239,031,927		(476,535)		(661,982)		(724,906)		2,377,325,332		2,612,956,454		2,561,971,518
	275,491,763		273,293,947		233,663,702		-		-		-		2,165,668,341		2,482,754,540		2,478,817,528
	8,817,669		-		-		-		-		-		34,091,251		30,347		35,104
	10,132,757		7,519,729		5,368,225		(476,535)		(661,982)		(724,906)		177,565,740		130,171,567		83,118,886
	21,443,907		1,310,598		809,514		(8,460)		5,140		-		63,794,935		65,305,507		17,829,282
	(112,418,729)		(111,094,930)		(86,884,090)		-		(5,140)		-		(1,009,702,135)		(1,449,084,420)		(1,194,858,034)
	(14,637,476)		(28,555,290)		(13,812,605)		3,962,147		1,220,179		-		(292,864,432)		(361,610,578)		(223,537,765)
	(62,465,952)		(55,518,422)		(49,411,567)		-		-		-		(386,111,799)		(763,783,683)		(711,525,815)
	(22,491,100)		(19,718,720)		(16,393,695)		(3,962,147)		(1,225,319)		-		(247,142,292)		(251,768,651)		(214,108,716)
	(12,824,201)		(7,302,498)		(7,266,223)		-		-		-		(83,583,612)		(71,921,508)		(45,685,738)
	203,467,367		171,029,344		152,957,351		(484,995)		(661,982)		(724,906)		1,431,418,132		1,229,177,541		1,384,942,766
	461,664		157,020		18,593		-		-		-		19,881,495		13,476,346		6,404,803
	(14,606,541)		(12,729,281)		2,657,451		-		-		-		(141,748,617)		(113,966,867)		(80,150,269)
	(21,653,706)		(18,465,710)		(14,254,393)		484,995		661,982		724,906		(131,303,219)		(117,716,347)		(138,178,677)
	167,668,784		139,991,373		141,379,002		-		-		-		1,178,247,791		1,010,970,673		1,173,018,623
	(41,395,669)		(38,894,195)		(36,724,390)		-		-		-		(220,709,881)		(209,061,131)		(194,915,189)
	(6,698,767)		(44,659)		-		-		-		-		(13,042,851)		(11,117,362)		(5,049,972)
	119,574,348		101,052,519		104,654,612		-		-		-		944,495,059		790,792,180		973,053,462
	(12,096,778)		(16,903,421)		(10,596,299)		4,146,888		1,721,129		(2,173,731)		(167,809,388)		(145,785,551)		(94,328,638)
	1,144,181		1,230,290		862,313		(2,226,200)		(1,841,637)		(2,146,863)		37,896,449		38,373,092		89,195,347
	(9,184,654)		(18,088,798)		(10,794,337)		2,226,198		2,196,021		2,146,863		(167,371,745)		(169,460,109)		(184,981,033)
	-		-		-		-		-		-		1,220,365		(785,468)		(5,484,279)
	(4,056,305)		(44,913)		(664,275)		4,146,890		1,366,745		(2,173,731)		(39,554,457)		(13,913,066)		6,941,327
	3,279,188		3,196		19,821		(8,975,752)		(4,235,887)		(12,320,110)		52,992,156		20,072,837		34,244,517
	(7,335,493)		(48,109)		(684,096)		13,122,642		5,602,632		10,146,379		(92,546,613)		(33,985,903)		(27,303,190)
	-		-		-		-		-		-		24,355,515		27,913,996		24,038,140
	-		-		-		-		-		-		835,817		657,026		1,038,160
	(182,051)		562,330		426,771		-		-		-		2,582,580		765,245		975,577
	107,295,519		84,711,428		94,485,084		4,146,888		1,721,129		(2,173,731)		804,459,583		674,342,896		904,776,701
	(31,842,461)		(31,275,247)		(27,749,046)		-		-		-		(229,566,686)		(210,602,693)		(252,107,318)
	75,453,058		53,436,181		66,736,038		4,146,888		1,721,129		(2,173,731)		574,892,897		463,740,203		652,669,383
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	75,453,058		53,436,181		66,736,038		4,146,888		1,721,129		(2,173,731)		574,892,897		463,740,203		652,669,383
	75,453,058		53,436,181		66,736,038		4,146,888		1,721,129		(2,173,731)		574,892,897		463,740,203		652,669,383
													294,420,283		160,758,139		303,891,384
													280,472,614		302,982,064		348,777,999

F-125

b) Distribution

Line of Business													Distribution
Country	Chile						Argentina						Brazil						Colombia						Peru						Eliminations						Total
ASSETS	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
CURRENT ASSETS		192,097,248		161,687,281		193,667,154		217,226,660		75,393,801		84,947,442		413,137,593		396,065,371		424,487,557		286,639,350		248,759,159		233,091,543		106,049,491		83,158,205		73,305,844		(3,541,399)		(3,228,460)		(8,446,413)		1,211,608,943		961,835,357		1,001,053,127
Cash and cash equivalents		22,774,490		6,800,784		26,582,727		8,696,329		13,979,227		21,100,767		65,536,627		46,175,000		109,978,438		116,480,956		132,138,584		131,270,670		41,802,393		27,824,497		9,290,173		-		-		-		255,290,795		226,918,092		298,222,775
Other current financial assets		309,009		3		-		-		248,730		-		16,895,101		21,786,059		-		72,924,655		25,853,350		25,011		3,941,104		-		-		-		-		-		94,069,869		47,888,142		25,011
Other current non-financial assets		1,793,463		2,458,642		2,312,576		1,181,675		982,584		1,246,994		71,204,617		58,667,785		27,375,759		3,591,691		6,465,483		5,118,035		2,013,596		2,667,568		2,636,552		-		-		-		79,785,042		71,242,062		38,689,916
Trade and other current receivables		149,400,234		146,524,961		152,223,272		195,835,234		50,892,193		54,255,165		248,214,780		256,665,873		254,576,869		86,878,811		78,708,428		82,197,032		49,200,081		48,194,935		56,990,519		2,968		-		-		729,532,108		580,986,390		600,242,857
Accounts receivable from related companies		15,082,952		4,002,377		10,623,831		757,342		910,306		776,127		22,750		-		-		2,735,244		2,444,649		9,761,211		3,156,941		54,071		14,453		(3,544,367)		(3,228,460)		(8,446,413)		18,210,862		4,182,943		12,729,209
Inventories		2,516,897		1,452,916		1,924,748		5,186,645		3,234,106		3,138,669		2,495,125		634,171		1,252,066		4,027,993		3,148,665		4,719,584		5,445,164		4,390,026		4,357,382		-		-		-		19,671,824		12,859,884		15,392,449
Current tax assets		220,203		447,598		-		5,569,435		5,146,655		4,429,720		8,768,593		12,136,483		31,304,425		-		-		-		490,212		27,108		16,765		-		-		-		15,048,443		17,757,844		35,750,910
Non-current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
NON-CURRENT ASSETS		1,210,687,967		1,141,771,230		1,116,514,950		284,575,650		249,249,898		272,099,510		1,748,919,068		1,813,358,782		1,994,823,050		965,222,710		949,733,045		937,334,342		487,752,639		456,528,437		434,005,821		-		-		-		4,697,158,034		4,610,641,392		4,754,777,673
Other non-current financial assets		22,728		25,109		25,176		61,181		86,201		-		452,494,316		375,227,434		-		7,143		7,117		7,024		-		3,183,912		2,792,448		-		-		-		452,585,368		378,529,773		2,824,648
Other non-current non-financial assets		319,503		333,644		229,343		480,779		580,733		885,726		58,799,681		59,325,193		79,626,762		-		1,074,740		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		59,599,963		61,314,310		80,741,831
Non-current receivables		6,055,189		6,863,063		3,699,470		1,668,894		1,666,444		1,378,682		34,859,235		32,901,738		251,693,307		11,995,821		10,300,046		10,285,519		-		-		-		-		-		-		54,579,139		51,731,291		267,056,978
Non-current accounts receivable from related companies		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		99,044		117,946		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		99,044		117,946
Investments accounted for using the equity method		552,161,023		510,734,951		503,579,522		21,641		25,684		31,383		-		-		-		33,085,547		33,528,901		31,365,165		-		-		-		-		-		-		585,268,211		544,289,536		534,976,070
Intangible assets other than goodwill		13,175,169		13,233,744		15,263,011		2,644,331		3,334,273		3,473,743		1,052,932,113		1,098,619,633		1,374,215,991		18,832,051		19,929,984		21,482,790		3,788,645		2,929,542		2,844,862		-		-		-		1,091,372,309		1,138,047,176		1,417,280,397
Goodwill		2,240,478		2,240,478		2,240,478		-		-		-		95,223,794		100,004,647		119,058,905		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		97,464,272		102,245,125		121,299,383
Property, plant, and equipment		636,528,765		608,238,795		583,180,744		279,698,824		243,556,563		266,329,976		20,065,773		18,163,438		20,746,848		864,965,468		847,581,454		838,130,612		483,963,994		450,414,983		428,368,511		-		-		-		2,285,222,824		2,167,955,233		2,136,756,691
Investment property		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Deferred tax assets		185,112		101,446		8,297,206		-		-		-		34,544,156		129,017,655		149,363,291		36,336,680		37,310,803		36,063,232		-		-		-		-		-		-		71,065,948		166,429,904		193,723,729
TOTAL ASSETS		1,402,785,215		1,303,458,511		1,310,182,104		501,802,310		324,643,699		357,046,952		2,162,056,661		2,209,424,153		2,419,310,607		1,251,862,060		1,198,492,204		1,170,425,885		593,802,130		539,686,642		507,311,665		(3,541,399)		(3,228,460)		(8,446,413)		5,908,766,977		5,572,476,749		5,755,830,800

F-126

Line of Business													Distribution
Country	Chile						Argentina						Brazil						Colombia						Peru						Eliminations						Total
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		12-31-2011 ThCh$
CURRENT LIABILITIES		228,651,495		195,903,833		196,759,945		446,887,893		376,427,290		310,638,397		310,263,199		366,781,235		489,046,971		289,883,566		279,593,205		294,852,368		119,780,608		121,210,186		103,699,413		(3,541,399)		(3,228,460)		(8,446,413)		1,391,925,362		1,336,687,289		1,386,550,681
Other current financial liabilities		131,149		47		26,351		8,217,233		27,634,365		22,349,209		59,916,172		104,776,985		226,703,734		69,830,480		66,840,051		10,772,339		35,151,405		33,719,936		32,046,376		-		-		-		173,246,439		232,971,384		291,898,009
Trade and other current payables		91,503,470		100,344,207		137,937,525		353,750,483		290,202,271		235,366,718		183,064,393		203,340,459		183,352,939		148,984,098		134,401,488		167,078,182		56,271,577		43,394,348		44,810,969		646		-		-		833,574,667		771,682,773		768,546,333
Accounts payable to related companies		111,091,592		80,044,605		23,267,428		1,566,103		1,837,109		2,249,562		20,234,079		20,985,919		20,937,120		30,522,419		31,019,825		77,542,865		7,452,597		9,418,449		11,369,623		(3,542,045)		(3,228,460)		(8,446,413)		167,324,745		140,077,447		126,920,185
Other current provisions		8,775,352		9,182,725		9,088,010		47,584,766		28,531,366		21,423,408		1,162,162		1,559,596		6,801,936		-		-		-		6,264,920		5,042,674		5,913,838		-		-		-		63,787,200		44,316,361		43,227,192
Current tax liabilities		16,612,912		4,814,657		25,872,525		11,359,482		2,831,011		7,016,288		28,512,477		20,926,914		36,202,808		32,519,099		40,775,096		34,217,419		4,396,429		4,870,431		5,730,192		-		-		-		93,400,399		74,218,109		109,039,232
Other current non-financial liabilities		537,020		1,517,592		568,106		24,409,826		25,391,168		22,233,212		17,373,916		15,191,362		15,048,434		8,027,470		6,556,745		5,241,563		10,243,680		24,764,348		3,828,415		-		-		-		60,591,912		73,421,215		46,919,730
Liabilities associated with non-current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES		43,735,684		70,857,008		52,473,555		26,488,657		17,990,925		41,497,104		772,314,235		815,506,536		870,301,120		345,076,634		311,739,452		379,922,653		213,494,034		202,239,407		210,609,245		-		-		-		1,401,109,244		1,418,333,328		1,554,803,677
Other non-current financial liabilities		-		-		-		6,309,078		2,929,147		25,941,484		492,050,733		439,191,002		478,627,090		269,389,169		234,412,181		295,721,421		163,077,749		147,679,985		152,604,148		-		-		-		930,826,729		824,212,315		952,894,143
Other non-current payables		-		-		-		-		-		905,643		22,937,735		14,081,540		13,155,174		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		22,937,735		14,081,540		14,060,817
Non-current accounts payable to related companies		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Other long-term provisions		6,556,806		8,738,743		7,618,844		8,257,705		7,830,746		9,239,778		129,252,556		124,438,070		160,166,774		9,949,344		2,672,924		3,888,164		214,112		201,947		165,531		-		-		-		154,230,523		143,882,430		181,079,091
Deferred tax liabilities		16,820,903		16,134,410		22,742,572		-		-		-		21,675,958		110,169,354		63,153,516		9,910,017		9,873,115		10,917,433		47,089,999		51,244,001		56,914,980		-		-		-		95,496,877		187,420,880		153,728,501
Non-current provisions for employee benefits		19,385,185		18,784,699		17,289,987		6,363,973		4,631,912		5,410,199		106,313,626		127,516,473		149,352,163		55,828,104		57,242,246		55,129,356		1,519,466		1,564,125		-		-		-		-		189,410,354		209,739,455		227,181,705
Other non-current non-financial liabilities		972,790		27,199,156		4,822,152		5,557,901		2,599,120		-		83,627		110,097		5,846,403		-		7,538,986		14,266,279		1,592,708		1,549,349		924,586		-		-		-		8,207,026		38,996,708		25,859,420
EQUITY		1,130,398,036		1,036,697,670		1,060,948,604		28,425,760		(69,774,516)		4,911,451		1,079,479,227		1,027,136,382		1,059,962,516		616,901,860		607,159,547		495,650,864		260,527,488		216,237,049		193,003,007		-		-		-		3,115,732,371		2,817,456,132		2,814,476,442
Equity attributable to shareholders of Enersis		1,130,398,036		1,036,697,670		1,060,948,604		28,425,760		(69,774,516)		4,911,451		1,079,479,227		1,027,136,382		1,059,962,516		616,901,860		607,159,547		495,650,864		260,527,488		216,237,049		193,003,007		-		-		-		3,115,732,371		2,817,456,132		2,814,476,442
Issued capital		367,928,681		367,928,682		368,494,984		69,224,795		83,616,788		135,477,599		387,386,697		336,739,309		466,167,408		3,593,166		3,579,786		7,905,014		37,694,885		37,643,914		32,841,625		-		-		-		865,828,224		829,508,479		1,010,886,630
Retained earnings		1,134,938,013		1,027,496,557		978,146,893		(43,583,682)		(156,754,885)		(92,338,025)		202,932,488		244,654,424		72,309,174		113,465,048		107,753,937		(2,694,357)		87,345,984		60,254,433		1,623,660		-		-		-		1,495,097,851		1,283,404,466		957,047,345
Share premium		566,302		566,302		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		3,627,695		3,614,187		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		4,193,997		4,180,489		-
Treasury shares		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Other equity interests		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Other reserves		(373,034,960)		(359,293,871)		(285,693,273)		2,784,647		3,363,581		(38,228,123)		489,160,042		445,742,649		521,485,934		496,215,951		492,211,637		490,440,207		135,486,619		118,338,702		158,537,722		-		-		-		750,612,299		700,362,698		846,542,467
Non-controlling interests		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total Liabilities and Equity		1,402,785,215		1,303,458,511		1,310,182,104		501,802,310		324,643,699		357,046,952		2,162,056,661		2,209,424,153		2,419,310,607		1,251,862,060		1,198,492,204		1,170,425,885		593,802,130		539,686,642		507,311,665		(3,541,399)		(3,228,460)		(8,446,413)		5,908,766,977		5,572,476,749		5,755,830,800

F-127

Line of Business																												Distribution
Country	Chile									Argentina									Brazil									Colombia									Peru									Eliminations						Total
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	12-31-2013 ThCh$			12-31-2012 ThCh$			12-31-2011 ThCh$			12-31-2013 ThCh$			12-31-2012 ThCh$			12-31-2011 ThCh$			12-31-2013 ThCh$			12-31-2012 ThCh$			12-31-2011 ThCh$			12-31-2013 ThCh$			12-31-2012 ThCh$			12-31-2011 ThCh$			12-31-2013 ThCh$			12-31-2012 ThCh$			12-31-2011 ThCh$			12-31-2013 ThCh$	12-31-2012 ThCh$			12-31-2011 ThCh$		12-31-2013 ThCh$			12-31-2012 ThCh$			12-31-2011 ThCh$
REVENUES		975,023,628			984,738,417			1,046,190,998			528,653,054			321,242,024			279,724,815			1,634,111,790			1,880,664,677			1,976,715,786			852,780,069			851,622,458			783,049,572			413,911,453			385,013,476			329,309,210		-		-			-		4,404,479,994			4,423,281,052			4,414,990,381
Sales		959,692,207			974,543,003			1,035,360,191			268,473,426			309,297,973			271,566,142			1,462,498,140			1,716,445,896			1,784,693,095			815,252,120			817,309,801			751,734,951			395,765,288			364,412,134			311,980,876		-		-			-		3,901,681,181			4,182,008,807			4,155,335,255
Energy sales		842,753,580			859,734,418			936,062,746			252,621,413			292,980,498			251,678,813			1,388,685,125			1,609,908,784			1,661,700,350			697,374,115			702,040,108			645,883,517			370,947,951			354,534,983			303,303,904		-		-			-		3,552,382,184			3,819,198,791			3,798,629,330
Other sales		7,963,873			8,535,176			6,051,771			361,681			412,885			-			-			-			-			3,280,645			2,566,899			2,107,573			6,136			38,502			45,957		-		-			-		11,612,335			11,553,462			8,205,301
Other services rendered		108,974,754			106,273,409			93,245,674			15,490,332			15,904,590			19,887,329			73,813,015			106,537,112			122,992,745			114,597,360			112,702,794			103,743,861			24,811,201			9,838,649			8,631,015		-		-			-		337,686,662			351,256,554			348,500,624
Other operating income		15,331,421			10,195,414			10,830,807			260,179,628			11,944,051			8,158,673			171,613,650			164,218,781			192,022,691			37,527,949			34,312,657			31,314,621			18,146,165			20,601,342			17,328,334		-		-			-		502,798,813			241,272,245			259,655,126
SUPPLIES AND SERVICES		(712,458,218	)		(728,000,745	)		(803,854,371	)		(169,802,328	)		(175,422,082	)		(141,879,982	)		(1,060,194,360	)		(1,247,583,156	)		(1,297,135,167	)		(464,474,672	)		(464,300,285	)		(436,664,901	)		(266,450,403	)		(252,013,491	)		(210,904,949	)	-		-			-		(2,673,379,981	)		(2,867,319,759	)		(2,890,439,370	)
Energy purchases		(628,376,374	)		(642,760,395	)		(728,175,203	)		(168,486,826	)		(174,672,141	)		(139,846,898	)		(686,576,752	)		(668,946,700	)		(704,848,626	)		(349,818,265	)		(348,283,812	)		(327,172,799	)		(241,896,638	)		(228,550,090	)		(188,535,528	)	-		-			-		(2,075,154,855	)		(2,063,213,138	)		(2,088,579,054	)
Fuel consumption		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-		-		-			-		-			-			-
Transportation expenses		(57,958,728	)		(59,678,207	)		(52,701,930	)		(1,194,862	)		(570,898	)		(978,324	)		(64,041,259	)		(128,233,904	)		(92,384,968	)		(78,964,131	)		(81,988,858	)		(79,060,148	)		-			-			(1,052	)	-		-			-		(202,158,980	)		(270,471,867	)		(225,126,422	)
Other miscellaneous supplies and services		(26,123,116	)		(25,562,143	)		(22,977,238	)		(120,640	)		(179,043	)		(1,054,760	)		(309,576,349	)		(450,402,552	)		(499,901,573	)		(35,692,276	)		(34,027,615	)		(30,431,954	)		(24,553,765	)		(23,463,401	)		(22,368,369	)	-		-			-		(396,066,146	)		(533,634,754	)		(576,733,894	)
CONTRIBUTION MARGIN		262,565,410			256,737,672			242,336,627			358,850,726			145,819,942			137,844,833			573,917,430			633,081,521			679,580,619			388,305,397			387,322,173			346,384,671			147,461,050			132,999,985			118,404,261		-		-			-		1,731,100,013			1,555,961,293			1,524,551,011
Infrastructure work		4,205,303			2,794,597			2,776,876			18,108,177			12,470,077			12,146,533			13,079,321			15,028,450			17,886,043			3,809,445			2,364,028			4,057,898			2,798,463			2,533,884			2,211,736		-		-			-		42,000,709			35,191,036			39,079,086
Employee expenses		(30,387,943	)		(28,098,186	)		(29,792,819	)		(121,588,649	)		(96,765,119	)		(87,034,352	)		(80,791,303	)		(88,652,016	)		(92,462,436	)		(33,308,955	)		(31,246,085	)		(31,059,021	)		(20,112,810	)		(18,344,299	)		(9,745,039	)	-		-			-		(286,189,660	)		(263,105,705	)		(250,093,667	)
Other fixed operating expenses		(62,191,404	)		(64,211,703	)		(60,852,918	)		(118,511,278	)		(99,917,490	)		(78,690,268	)		(135,153,017	)		(137,882,457	)		(146,412,225	)		(55,855,565	)		(53,663,965	)		(77,699,549	)		(21,220,124	)		(22,294,925	)		(18,518,662	)	-		-			-		(392,931,388	)		(377,970,540	)		(382,173,622	)
GROSS OPERATING RESULT		174,191,366			167,222,380			154,467,766			136,858,976			(38,392,590	)		(15,733,254	)		371,052,431			421,575,498			458,592,001			302,950,322			304,776,151			241,683,999			108,926,579			94,894,645			92,352,296		-		-			-		1,093,979,674			950,076,084			931,362,808
Depreciation and amortization		(27,033,400	)		(27,216,121	)		(25,533,034	)		(12,909,107	)		(14,336,316	)		(13,804,113	)		(86,883,098	)		(92,210,040	)		(98,073,051	)		(61,825,005	)		(65,854,529	)		(61,899,086	)		(24,005,738	)		(23,483,203	)		(20,838,624	)	-		-			-		(212,656,348	)		(223,100,209	)		(220,147,908	)
Impairment reversal (impairment losses)		(8,277,086	)		(6,631,388	)		(9,250,045	)		(1,951,710	)		(1,373,527	)		(107,632,541	)		(50,553,285	)		(24,644,075	)		(5,873,081	)		(236,860	)		(149,840	)		(425,602	)		(816,132	)		(1,342,800	)		(1,614,116	)	-		-			-		(61,835,073	)		(34,141,630	)		(124,795,385	)
Operating Income		138,880,880			133,374,871			119,684,687			121,998,159			(54,102,433	)		(137,169,908	)		233,616,048			304,721,383			354,645,869			240,888,457			238,771,782			179,359,311			84,104,709			70,068,642			69,899,556		-		-			-		819,488,253			692,834,245			586,419,515
FINANCIAL RESULT		500,342			9,223,777			10,648,013			(13,178,989	)		(29,719,536	)		(7,990,001	)		(2,582,536	)		12,072,874			(72,935,412	)		(23,123,000	)		(26,268,820	)		(31,198,764	)		(14,976,086	)		(11,503,704	)		(12,080,615	)	(53,882)		97,941			60,038		(53,414,151	)		(46,097,468	)		(113,496,741	)
Financial income		8,218,478			10,291,435			15,874,126			32,944,854			5,357,720			6,538,668			110,285,525			155,301,692			58,787,606			7,279,595			8,755,185			5,377,801			2,340,149			3,799,957			1,846,358		-		-			-		161,068,601			183,505,989			88,424,559
Financial expenses		(7,777,657	)		(2,281,296	)		(4,383,448	)		(45,795,956	)		(35,873,443	)		(15,352,367	)		(113,177,408	)		(144,016,072	)		(132,097,058	)		(30,335,480	)		(35,098,814	)		(36,602,706	)		(16,965,295	)		(15,535,299	)		(14,114,310	)	-		-			-		(214,051,796	)		(232,804,924	)		(202,549,889	)
Gain (loss) from indexed assets and liabilities		558,758			1,204,984			42,067			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-		-		-			-		558,758			1,204,984			42,067
Foreign currency exchange differences		(499,237	)		8,654			(884,732	)		(327,887	)		796,187			823,698			309,347			787,254			374,040			(67,115	)		74,809			26,141			(350,940	)		231,638			187,337		(53,882)		97,941			60,038		(989,714	)		1,996,483			586,522
Positive		1,981,184			745,506			798,025			742,128			1,113,208			1,121,128			422,873			841,360			2,081,506			103,323			324,301			326,989			804,523			930,908			562,888		(599,999)		(193,281	)		60,038		3,454,032			3,762,002			4,950,574
Negative		(2,480,421	)		(736,852	)		(1,682,757	)		(1,070,015	)		(317,021	)		(297,430	)		(113,526	)		(54,106	)		(1,707,466	)		(170,438	)		(249,492	)		(300,848	)		(1,155,463	)		(699,270	)		(375,551	)	546,117		291,222			-		(4,443,746	)		(1,765,519	)		(4,364,052	)
Share of the profit (loss) from associates accounted for using the equity method		-			-			-			-			310			468			-			-			-			933,704			2,467,940			2,602,952			-			-			-		-		-			-		933,704			2,468,250			2,603,420
Gain (loss) from other investments		-			-			-			-			80,290			-			-			-			-			-			(16	)		-			-			-			-		-		-			-		-			80,274			-
Gain (loss) on the sale of property, plant, and equipment		(176,425	)		(173,274	)		(4,305	)		-			-			-			2,761,811			1,983,259			-			70,773			(399,837	)		(217,888	)		905,210			(97,875	)		(8,420	)	-		-			-		3,561,369			1,312,273			(230,613	)
NET INCOME BEFORE TAX		139,204,797			142,425,374			130,328,395			108,819,170			(83,741,369	)		(145,159,441	)		233,795,323			318,777,516			281,710,457			218,769,934			214,571,049			150,545,611			70,033,833			58,467,063			57,810,521		(53,882)		97,941			60,038		770,569,175			650,597,574			475,295,581
Income tax		(31,370,850	)		(24,732,757	)		(33,614,812	)		(10,685,347	)		2,935,068			(12,248,134	)		(66,562,047	)		(100,740,767	)		(75,932,075	)		(75,302,320	)		(69,798,727	)		(60,083,765	)		(19,520,536	)		(18,540,672	)		(16,517,066	)	-		-			-		(203,441,100	)		(210,877,855	)		(198,395,852	)
NET INCOME AFTER TAX FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		107,833,947			117,692,617			96,713,583			98,133,823			(80,806,301	)		(157,407,575	)		167,233,276			218,036,749			205,778,382			143,467,614			144,772,322			90,461,846			50,513,297			39,926,391			41,293,455		(53,882)		97,941			60,038		567,128,075			439,719,719			276,899,729
Net income from discontinued operations		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-		-		-			-		-			-			-
NET INCOME		107,833,947			117,692,617			96,713,583			98,133,823			(80,806,301	)		(157,407,575	)		167,233,276			218,036,749			205,778,382			143,467,614			144,772,322			90,461,846			50,513,297			39,926,391			41,293,455		(53,882)		97,941			60,038		567,128,075			439,719,719			276,899,729
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO		107,833,947			117,692,617			96,713,583			98,133,823			(80,806,301	)		(157,407,575	)		167,233,276			218,036,749			205,778,382			143,467,614			144,772,322			90,461,846			50,513,297			39,926,391			41,293,455		(53,882)		97,941			60,038		567,128,075			439,719,719			276,899,729
Shareholders of Enersis																																																					403,980,232			236,219,927			132,562,427
Non-controlling interests																																																					163,147,843			203,499,792			144,337,302

F-128

35. THIRD PARTY GUARANTEES, OTHER CONTINGENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES, AND OTHER COMMITMENTS

35.1 Direct guarantees

Creditor of Guarantee	Debtor		Type   of   Guarantee	Assets Committed				Balance Pending					Guarantees Released
				Type	Currency	Accounting   Value		at December 31
	Name	Relationship						Currency	2013		2012		2014		Assets		2015		Assets		2016		Assets
Mitsubishi	Endesa Costanera	Creditor	Pledge	Combined cycle	ThCh$		24,374,559	ThCh$		73,830,430		67,546,660		-		-		-		-		-		-
Credit Suisse First Boston	Endesa Costanera	Creditor	Pledge	Combined cycle	ThCh$		10,725,737	ThCh$		3,147,660		4,799,600		-		-		-		-		-		-
Banco de la Nación Argentina	Endesa Costanera	Creditor	Pledge on collection and others	Collection CAMMESA   accounts	ThCh$		521,832	ThCh$		521,832		2,902,660		-		-		-		-		-		-
Citibank N.A.	Endesa Chile	Creditor	Pledge	Current account deposit	ThCh$		1,049,220	ThCh$		796,448		-
Citibank N.A. / Santander Río	Edesur	Creditor	Pledge	Money deposit	ThCh$		-	ThCh$		-		5,686,862		-		-		-		-		-		-
Banco Santander (security agent)	G.N.L. Quintero	Associate	Pledge	Shares	ThCh$		4,789,060	ThCh$		102,302,517		97,034,059		-		-		-		-		-		-
Deutsche Bank / Santander Benelux	Enersis S.A.	Creditor	Deposit account	Deposit account	ThCh$		34,864,825	ThCh$		56,138,756		60,774,330		-		-		-		-		-		-
Various creditors	Ampla S.A.	Creditor	Pledge on collection and others		ThCh$		7,480,183	ThCh$		178,884,259		122,400,013		-		-		-		-		-		-
Various creditors	Coelce S.A.	Creditor	Pledge on collection and others		ThCh$		10,753,536	ThCh$		101,052,930		77,984,021		-		-		-		-		-		-
International Finance Corporation	CGT Fortaleza   S.A.	Creditor	Mortgage and pledge	Real estate and equipment	ThCh$		141,413,819	ThCh$		25,461,857		29,477,645		-		-		-		-		-		-

As of December 31, 2013, Enersis S.A. had future energy purchase commitments amounting to ThCh$20,390,857,446 (ThCh$24,179,632,682 at December 31, 2012 and ThCh$29,249,750,127 at January 1, 2012).

35.2 Indirect Guarantees

Creditor of Guarantee

Debtor

Assets Committed

Balance Pending

Guarantees Released

Type of

Type of

Accounting

at December 31

Name

Relationship

Guarantee

Currency

Value

Currency

2013

2012

2014

Assets

2015

Assets

2016

2017

Bonds and bank loans

Chinango

Filial

Aval

ThCh$

4,692,397

ThCh$

4,692,397

15,245,788

-

-

-

-

-

-

F-129

35.3 Lawsuits and arbitrations Proceedings.

As of the date of these Consolidated Financial Statements, the most relevant litigation involving Enersis and its subsidiaries are as follows:

1.  Law 25,561 on Public Emergency and Reform to the Currency System, enacted on January 6, 2002 by the Argentine authorities, voided certain provisions of the concession agreement of Enersis’ subsidiary Edesur. Law 25,561 also required that utility concession agreements be renegotiated within a reasonable timeframe to adjust them to the new conditions. However, the failure to renegotiate Edesur’s concession agreement prompted Enersis S.A., Chilectra S.A., Endesa Chile and Elesur S.A. (now Chilectra S.A.) (collectively, the “Claimants”) to file an arbitration petition in 2003 under the Treaty for the Promotion and Protection of Chilean-Argentine Investments with the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The statement of claim principally requested that the ICSID declare the expropriation of Edesur’s assets and that Edesur suffered damages totaling US$1,306,875,960 (approximately Ch$ 685,600 million). In the alternative, the Claimants requested that ICSID award compensatory damages caused to Edesur’s assets due to lack of fair and equitable treatment, totaling US$318,780,600. The Claimants also seek, with respect to both claims, compounded annual interest of 6.9% per annum. The Claimants also claimed the sums resulting from the damages caused as from July 1, 2004. Finally, the claimants also demanded US$102,164,683 for Elesur S.A. (now Chilectra S.A.) due to a lower price received on a sale of its shares as a result of the alleged expropriation. In 2005, the Argentine authorities and Edesur executed a Letter of Understanding, which was not objected to by the Argentine parliament and was later ratified by the Executive Branch. The Letter of Understanding amends and supplements the terms and conditions of the concession agreement, introducing adjusted rates, first during a transitional period and then under a Comprehensive Rate Review that will establish the conditions for a regular 5-year rate period. Arbitration has been stayed since March 2006 in accordance with the terms of the Letter of Understanding, and the appointment of one of the arbitrators has been suspended as well, since the prior one resigned from his position in 2010.

2.  In Brazil, Basilus S/A Serviços, Empreendimentos e Participações (successor of Meridional S/A Serviços, Empreendimentos e Participações starting 2008) is the title holder of the rights it acquired from the construction companies Mistral and CIVEL, which had a civil works contract with Centrais Elétricas Fluminense S.A. (CELF). This contract was terminated before CELF’s privatization process. Since CELF’s assets were transferred to Ampla during the privatization process, Basilus (previously Meridional) sued Ampla in 1998, contending that the referred to assets had been transferred in detriment of its rights. Ampla only acquired assets from CELF, but is not its successor-in-interest since CELF, a state-owned company, still exits and maintains its legal capacity. The plaintiff demanded payment of pending invoices and contractual penalties for termination of the civil works contract. In March 2009, the court decided in favor of Meridional, and Ampla and the State of Rio de Janeiro filed the corresponding appeals. On December 15, 2009, the State Court accepted the appeal and overturned the lower court’s decision obtained by the plaintiff, in Ampla’s favor. Basilus filed an appeal against the resolution, which was denied. In July 2010, the plaintiff filed a new Appeal under Specific Court Regulations (“Agravo Regimental”) with the Superior Court of Justice of Brazil, which the court also denied in late August 2010, ruling it was groundless. In order to overturn such decision, Meridional filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Mandado de Seguranca), which was also denied. In June 2011, Meridional filed an Appeal to Petition Clarification of the Decision (Embargos de Declaração) in order to clarify an omission by the Superior Court of Justice in the decision on the Petition of Writ of Mandamus, which was not accepted by the court. Against this decision, Meridional filed a Regular Appeal (Recurso Ordinario) before the Superior Court of Justice (in Brasilia). On March 28, 2012 the Reporting Justice decided the Regular Appeal in favor of Meridional. Ampla and the State of Rio de Janeiro filed an Appeal under Specific Court Regulations against the Reporting Justice’s decision, which was accepted by the First Court Room of the Superior Court of Justice on August 28, 2012, determining that the Regular Appeal of the Petition of Writ of Mandamus must be submitted to the full Court and not only by one single Justice. The plaintiff (Meridional) challenged the decision. The sentence of August 28, 2012 was published on December 10, 2012, once the Amendment of Judgment (Embargos Declaração) had been filed by Ampla and the State of Rio de Janeiro to remedy the existing error in its publication, in order to avoid future divergence. The plaintiff filed its response to the embargoes and on May 27, 2013 the Embargos de Declaração filed by Ampla and the State of Rio de Janeiro were accepted and the error corrected. Consequently, the proceeding is in its second legal instance with a sentence favorable to Ampla and there are pending proceedings before the Superior Court of Law. The amount involved in this trial is estimated to be approximately R$ 1,052 million (approximately Ch$ 235,589 million).

F-130

3. The Trade Union of Niterói, representing 2,841 employees, filed a labor claim against Ampla, requesting the payment of salary differences of 26.05% starting from February 1989, pursuant to the Economic Plan instituted by Law Decree No. 2.335/87. In first instance, sentence was partially unfavorable for Ampla, determining payment of salary differences requested from February 1, 1989, in addition to payment of attorney fees amounting to 15%. Ampla filed recourses, among them an extraordinary recourse is pending sentence. The Court of Law ordered entering into a conciliation hearing held without success. In parallel, Ampla has filed a motion for Advanced Dismissal of Enforcement (Exceção de Pré-executividade) based on the jurisprudence of the Federal Supreme Court, which has previously declared the non-existence of a right acquired on the URP readjustment of Law Decree No. 2.235/87. In addition, Ampla alleged the exception of the payment for these readjustments and, alternatively, requested the limitation of this readjustment up to the base date (October/89). In first instance, Ampla was successful in obtaining declaration that the judicial title was unenforceable, regarding which the plaintiff filed the Agravo de Petição (Appeal Request) against such ruling, being partially successful regarding payment exception, but the rest backed by Ampla in terms of limiting salary difference up to the base date (October 1989) was kept. The parties are waiting to have the recourses filed sentenced. The amount of this proceeding is estimated to be of approximately R$54 million (approximately Ch$ 12,093 million).

4. In 1996, 45 workers filed a suit requesting reinstatement to their employment positions with Enersis’s Brazilian distribution company, Ampla. Ampla obtained a favorable ruling in 2003. The Higher Labor Court of Law acknowledged that the early retirement terminated the work contracts. Later based on some rulings that recognized that inclusion in voluntary advanced retirement programs do not terminate the associated work contract, the workers filed a “rescissory suit” before the Higher Labor Court of Law grounded on the aforementioned rulings. The plaintiffs dismissed from Ampla are attempting to be reinstated by the company and that the stability guarantee based on the regulatory resolution of the old Energy Secretary of the State of Rio de Janeiro be applied. Ampla’s defense, in the course of this proceeding, is attempting to uphold the unconstitutionality of the legislative resolution and the consequent non-existence of the stability right, regardless of whether the voluntary early retirement cancels the work contract or not. In terms of the proceedings Ampla alleged that the right of the plaintiffs to file a rescissory suit had expired, which allegation was accepted and the resolution that had caused the reinstatement of the plaintiffs in Ampla was revoked. Against the aforementioned allegations, the plaintiffs filed an extraordinary appeal before the Supreme Federal Court, which was rejected. Such rejection was appealed by the plaintiffs in August 2013 and the decision of these appeals is currently pending. The amount involved in this proceeding is estimated to be R$ 125 million (approximately Ch$ 27,993 million).

5. Companhia Brasileira de Antibióticos (“Cibran”) filed suit against Enersis’s Brazilian distribution subsidiary, Ampla, for damages for the loss of products and raw materials, machinery breakdown, among other things, which allegedly occurred as a result of poor service provided by Ampla between 1987 and May 1994. Cibran is also seeking payment of punitive damages. This litigation is in the trial stage and has been joined with various other claims filed by Cibran against Ampla, including five other actions for smaller amounts based on power outages allegedly caused by Ampla, in the period from 1987 to 1994, 1994 to 1999 and part of 2002. These proceedings are in the first instance. The judge decided to conduct a single expert assessment for these various claims, which was in part adverse to Ampla. Ampla challenged such assessment, and requested a new expert assessment. On September 5, 2013 the judge rejected the prior petition, against which Ampla filed Appeals to Petition Clarification of the Decision, which are pending review by the court. The amount involved for all these cases is estimated to be approximately R$ 150 million (approximately Ch$ 33,591 million).

6. In December 2001, the article of the Brazilian Federal Constitution used by Ampla to claim an exemption from the COFINS (Contribuicao para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social, a tax levied on revenues) tax was amended. Ampla only started to pay the COFINS tax beginning in April 2002 because it believed that the changes in law are effective 90 days after they are published. However, the Federal Revenue (Receita Federal) argued that this constitutional norm applies only to amendments at the level of statutes, but not to those made to the Federal Constitution itself, which would apply immediately. In November 2007, the appeal was decided at the administrative appeals level (Consejo de Contribuyentes, Taxpayers Council), against Ampla. In October 2008, Ampla filed a special appeal that was denied. On December 30, 2013, Ampla was notified on the decision that Ampla’s argument that the COFINS payment was undue in the December 2001 to March 2002 period was not accepted since there is a provision in the Constitution that legislation changes are effective 90 days after they are published. Ampla will continue to recur before the courts of law, which is why it will have to previously guarantee the taxing debt (depending on the formula adopted, the guarantee will increase to 30%, totaling €45.5 thousand). The sum amounts to R$114 million (approximately Ch$ 25,529 million).

F-131

7.  After the definite sentence in favor of Enersis was decreed in 2010 regarding COFINS immunity, in which the Public Treasury tried to revoke through a “rescission action” a firm and executed sentence in August 1996 in favor of Ampla protecting it from paying COFINS (until 2001 when the constitution was amended to expressly levy electric power operations with this tax), Ampla has resumed a proceeding filed in 1996 that had been suspended while the first litigation was processed, requesting refund of COFINS’ payments from April 1992 to June 1996, based on the firm sentence in its favor regarding that immunity is applicable to prior accounting periods and therefore that they have the right to get refund of what was paid in an undue manner. In June 2013, there was a first sentence in Ampla’s favor declaring the right to receive refund of the amounts COFINS paid for all the accounting periods requested. The Public Treasury filed an appeal against the sentence before the Court of Río de Janeiro. The sum Ampla requests refund amounts to R$ 157 million (approximately Ch$ 35,159 million).

8.  In order to fund its investment in Coelce in 1998, Ampla issued long-term debt abroad through securities called Fixed Rate Notes (FRNs) which were governed by a special tax regime whereby interest payments received by non-resident holders were exempt from taxation in Brazil, so long as the debt was issued with a minimum maturity of 8 years. In 2005 the Brazilian Taxing Administration notified Ampla through a tax resolution that it had declared the non-applicability of the special tax regime based on its understanding that it had implicitly caused advanced amortization payments before the required maturity, because Ampla had received financing in Brazil which it allocated to the FRN holders. In Ampla’s opinion, they are two independent legally valid transactions. The non-applicability of the regime assumes that Ampla would have failed to comply with its obligation to retain the tax and deposit it in respect of interest payments made to non-resident holders. The tax resolution was appealed and in 2007 the Consejo de Contribuyentes (Taxpayers Council) annulled it. However, the Brazilian Taxing Administration contested this decision before the Superior Chamber of Fiscal Resources (Cámara Superior de Recursos Fiscales), the final administrative tribunal, and on November 6, 2012 it issued a judgment against Ampla. The decision was notified to Ampla on December 21 and on December 28, 2012; Ampla filed an Appeal to Petition Clarification of the Decision before the Chamber in order to clarify a final resolution regarding contradictory points of the judgment and that the relevant defense arguments that were omitted be incorporated. On October 15, 2013 Ampla was summoned to hear the decision that rejected the clarification recourse (“Embargo de Declaración”) filed on December 28, 2012. With the above, Ampla filed a cautionary legal action in order to assure obtaining certification of fiscal regularity allowing Ampla to continue receiving public funds, which is why the taxing debt had to be previously guaranteed (guarantee insurance, where the guarantee is increased 30%, totaling €338 million). The judge rejected Ampla’s provisional decision request to accept the guarantee insurance. Ampla will file recourse before the Court of Law of Río de Janeiro to try to change the decision. It is important to state that the final negative resolution of the Superior Court will imply opening a criminal proceeding against certain Ampla employees and administrators (since the Council ratified the existence of simulation). The sum amounts to R$ 847 million (approximately Ch$ 189,680 million).

9. In 2002, the State of Rio de Janeiro issued a decree establishing that the ICMS (an equivalent of the Chilean Value Added Tax) should be paid on the 10th, 20th and 30th days of the same month of the accrual. Ampla continued paying ICMS in accordance with the previous system (on the 5th day of the month following its accrual) and did not adopt this system between September 2002 and February 2005 due to cash flow problems. Additionally, Ampla filed a legal suit to dispute the constitutionality of the demand of the anticipatory tax payments. Ampla was not successful in this legal suit in any of the proceeding phases, now pending sentence of the recourse filed before STF (Brasilia Court of Law, which judges constitutional issues). Ampla, starting from March 2005, has paid the ICMS according to the new system. In September 2005 the State of Rio de Janeiro issued a resolution against Ampla to collect the fine and interest on late payments set in the aforementioned Decree of 2002. Ampla appealed the resolution before the Administrative Courts of Law, based on the tax Amnesty Laws of the State of Río de Janeiro published in 2004 and 2005 (forgiving interest and penalties if the taxpayer paid the pending taxes). Ampla alleges that if the aforementioned tax amnesties for Ampla do not turn out to be applicable, the law would mistreat taxpayers that are delayed only a few days in the payment of taxes (Ampla’s case) in a worse manner in comparison to those who, formally, later relied on the various tax amnesties to regulate their tax situation through paying taxes that were not paid in the past.

F-132

The “En Banc Council” (a special body within the Taxpayers Council, representing the last administrative instance) on May 9, 2012 issued judgment against Ampla. The sentence was notified on August 29, 2012. Ampla requested the State Public Treasury (Hacienda Pública Estadual) to review the decision through a special review procedure based on the equity principle, before the Governor of the Estado de Río de Janeiro. The recourse has still not been solved, which is why the taxing debt should be suspended. However, the Estado de Rio de Janeiro has registered the debt in the public registry as if it is demandable, which has forced contributing a guarantee of €101 million (R$293 ) on November 12, 2012, in order to suspend the legal action and continue receiving public funds. On June 4, 2013, a sentence in second instance accepted the recourse filed by the Public Treasury of the State of Río de Janeiro against the guarantee Ampla filed. In September 2013, Ampla filed a letter of guarantee to substitute the “guarantee insurance” rejected by the court of law. However, Ampla reiterated to the attorney of the State, the petition for review is still pending a decision. The amount involved in this proceeding is R$ 232 million (approximately Ch$ 51,954 million).

10.  In 1982 and under the framework of an extension project of the electric energy supply network in rural zones in Brazil, mainly financed by international financial entities (IDB), Companhia Energética do Ceará S.A. (Coelce), at that time owned by the State of Ceará, signed use contracts of the electric system with 13 cooperatives, at the request of the Government and through demands from these financial entities in order to implement this project. These contracts established Coelce’s obligation to pay a monthly lease restated according to inflation, making Coelce responsible for the operation and maintenance of these assets. These contracts were subscribed for an indefinite time period and, given the circumstances of creating rural electrifying companies, as well as the then Coelce’s public nature, they did not establish a clear definition of the networks that were the object of the contract, since they have been replaced and extended from that time, confusing these assets with those owned by the company. From 1982 to June 1995 Coelce regularly paid the lease for the use of the cooperatives’ electric system, restated monthly by the corresponding inflation index. However, starting June 1995, Coelce, still state-owned, decided not to continue restating the value of the payments or making the corresponding adjustments. In 1998, Coelce was privatized and became part of the Enersis Group and continued to pay lease for the networks to the cooperatives in the manner done until before it was privatized, i.e, without restating lease values. Due to the above, some of these cooperatives have filed judicial actions against Companhia Energética do Ceará S.A., among which the two legal actions filed by Cooperativa de Eletrificação Rural do V do Acarau Ltda (Coperva) can be highlighted. Coelce’s defense is basically grounded on the argument that the rent amount adjustment is not appropriate, since the assets lacked value due to their very extended useful life, taking into consideration their depreciation; or, alternatively, in case the assets have any value, in that their value would be very low given that Coelce performed their replacement, extension and maintenance. The trial total amount is of approximately R$153,346 million (approximately Ch$ 34,340 million). In one of the legal actions Coperva has filed, a review action, the expert test has been performed, which was contested by Coelce, calling on technical inconsistencies and requesting performance of a new expert review. Despite this contesting measure, taking into consideration a request Coperva filed, in February 2013 the judge decreed “the anticipated execution of the sentence”, defining in a preliminary manner the value of the monthly fee of the alleged Coperva installations, as well as immediate payment of the difference between this value and the value currently paid. The Coelce defense is basically grounded on the argument that the adjustment of the rent amounts is not appropriate, since the assets lacked value due to their very extended useful life, taking into consideration their depreciation; or, alternatively, in case the assets have any value, in that it would be very low, given that Coelce is the one that has performed their replacement, development and maintenance. The amount involved in this proceeding is R$ 153,345,914 (approximately Ch$ 34,340 million). In one of the actions that Coperva filed, a review action, an expert review was performed, which Coelce contested, calling on technical inconsistencies and requesting a new expert review. Despite this contesting action, taking into consideration a request that Coperva filed in February 2013, the judge decreed “the sentence anticipated execution”, defining in a preliminary manner the value of the monthly fee of the alleged Coperva installations, as well as the immediate payment of the difference between this value and the value currently paid. Regarding the matter, a recourse has been filed and a precautionary measure has been obtained in favor of Coelce, paralyzing the anticipated execution decision, Coelce has filed its final allegations and the proceeding is currently waiting its final sentence.

11. In October 2009, Tractebel Energía S.A. sued CIEN claiming an alleged breach of the “Purchase & Sale Agreement for 300 MW of Firm Capacity with related energy originating from Argentina” entered into in 1999 by and between CIEN and Centrais Geradoras do Sul do Brasil S.A (Gerasul — presently Tractebel Energía). Tractebel asked the court to order that CIEN pay a rescission penalty of R$ 117,666,976 (approximately Ch$ 26,350 million) plus other fines due to the non-availability of “firm capacity and related energy,” and asked the court to determine

F-133

those other fines in its ruling. The breach allegedly occurred due to a failure by CIEN to assure the availability of capacity contractually agreed with Tractebel over the 20-year period, which allegedly took place beginning in March 2005. In May 2010, Tractebel notified CIEN via a written statement, but not judicially, that it intended to exercise its step-in rights in Line I (30%). The proceeding is currently at the trial stage. CIEN petitioned to join this proceeding with the lawsuit filed by CIEN against Tractebel in 2001, in which the collection of values relative to the rate of exchange and taxing issues is under dispute, which petition for joinder was rejected by the court of law. In May 2013, CIEN requested the suspension of the proceeding for 180 days in order to avoid divergent decisions, which petition was transferred to Tractebel to file its briefs regarding the matter.

12.  In 2010 Furnas Centrais Eletricas S.A. filed a suit against CIEN, based on CIEN’s alleged breach of Firm Capacity Purchase Agreement for the purchase of 700 MW of firm capacity with related energy originating from Argentina, which was signed in 1998 with a term of 20 years starting from June 2000. In its claim, Furnas requests that CIEN be ordered to pay R$ 520,800,659 (approximately Ch$ 116,630 million), as a rescission penalty according to what is provided for in the agreement, as adjusted according to the terms of such agreement, plus interest from the date of filing of the claim until actual payment, as well as other penalties based on the lack of availability of the “firm power and associated energy” (contracted capacity), and other damages to be determined upon the final decision. The proceeding is in its first instance, and the passing of the first trial judgment is pending. In respect of the foreign language documents presented by CIEN, the trial judge of first instance determined that those documents would be excluded from the lawsuit, which decision was affirmed by the 12th Civil Section of the State Court. CIEN has filed a Regular Appeal (Recurso Especial) against this decision, which will be decided by the Superior Court of Justice. In addition, CIEN received a communication from Furnas, not at the judicial seat, indicating that in case of termination due to CIEN’s non-compliance, it has the right to acquire 70% of Line I.

13.  At the end of 2002 Endesa Fortaleza filed a legal action against the Federal Union, in order to get recognition that imported goods for the turbo-generating units corresponded to the item “Other Power Generating Units” to thus get access to 0% rate for the Import Tax (II) and the Tax on Industrialized Products (IPI, Impuesto de Productos Industrializados, as per its acronym in Spanish). Endesa Fortaleza got an incidental sentence in its favor in the main legal action that allows importing goods at customs with a 0% rate, but prior to a judicial support of the sum of taxes. Endesa Fortaleza has obtained favorable sentences in the administrative legal instance and in the Superior Court of Law of Justice (Brasilia) (in the main legal suit). In 2002 Endesa Fortaleza filed a judicial action (incidental) that treats the type of import tax applicable to the power generating unit (from 0% to 14%). In this legal action CGTF was also successful in the first and second instances. The Public Treasury has filed a new recourse. The parties are waiting for the recourse sentencing. The judicial deposit must be kept as guarantee of the proceedings until its final sentencing. The sum amounts to R$ 81 million (Ch$ 18,139 million).

14. In February 2007, the Brazilian Tax Authorities drew up a minute to Endesa Fortaleza for PIS/COFINS for the accounting periods of December 2003 and from February 2004 to November 2004, referring to the alleged differences produced between the amounts declared in the annual declaration (where the PIS/COFINS amounts were reported under the new non-accrued regime) and the amounts declared in the monthly declaration (where the amounts due were reported under the old accrual system). The company filed an appeal before the Taxpayers’ Council and is currently awaiting decision. The sum is of approximately R$ 68 million (Ch$ 15,228 million).

15. In 2001, a lawsuit was filed against the Colombian generation subsidiary Emgesa S.A. E.S.P., Empresa de Energía de Bogotá S.A. E.S.P. (“EEB”) and Corporación Autónoma Regional, by the inhabitants of Sibaté, Department of Cundinamarca. The lawsuit seeks to make the defendants jointly and severally liable for the damages arising from the pollution of the El Muñá reservoir, as a result of Emgesa’s pumping of polluted waters from the Bogotá River. Emgesa has challenged these allegations, establishing that it is not liable for these damages, arguing, among other things, that it receives already polluted waters, among other arguments. The initial demand of the plaintiffs was for approximately 3 trillion Colombian pesos, which is equal to approximately Ch$ 816,798 million. Emgesa petitioned for the joinder of numerous public and private entities that dump into the waters of the Bogotá River or that in any way or another have responsibility for the environmental management of this river’s basin, with respect to which petition the Third Section of the State Council resolved to have some of these companies joined as defendants. In January 2013 answers that were filed by several of the defendants against the complaint and in June 2013 the petition for annulment of what was done in the proceeding was resolved to be denied as out-of-order. Currently the prior exceptions resolution and call to the conciliation hearing are still pending in the proceedings.

F-134

16. In Colombia, upon creating an electrical distribution subsidiary Codensa, in 1997, Empresa de Energía de Bogotá S.A. E.S.P. (EEB) contributed to the new company all public lighting infrastructures and other sale and distribution assets in exchange for 51.5% of this company’s shares. However, there was no absolute clarity regarding the inventory of lights in the city and this generated differences in the future regarding invoicing and settlement of the energy value that Codensa supplied to the municipality. In 2005, a geo-reference inventory of the lights was performed, which gave as a result a difference of 8,661 lights less than those that Codensa effectively considered in its billing and settlement to the District. In order to solve the conflict the parties carried out workshop sessions to come to an agreement. However, in 2009 a private citizen filed a derivative action in which he requests that the court of law: (i) declare the rights of the administrative morality and public property violated; (ii) Codensa be ordered to carry out the settlement that includes delinquent interest due to the higher values paid between 1998 and 2004; and, (iii) the incentive due to administrative morality be recognized to the actor (15% of what the District recovers). The first instance judgment, confirmed by the second instance judgment, ordered the Administrative Special Public Utilities Unit and Codensa to, within a time period of two months starting from the date of issuance of the judgment, carry out all necessary negotiations to establish in a definitive manner the balances either in favor or against Codensa, duly adjusted by the DTF plus interest. In case that no agreement is reached, then the Administrative Special Public Utilities Unit itself can perform within a new time period of two months the unilateral judgment and deliver it to Codensa for its consideration, can exercise remedies through the relevant government channels and, in case of non-payment must proceed to execute the judgment. To date, negotiations have been performed by the parties to reach an agreement, pending approval by the authorities of the Greater Municipality of Bogota, which is why on June 28, 2013 Codensa filed before the judge a description of the work undertaken to comply with the sentence. On September 6, 2013 the Comptroller sent a writ to Codensa announcing future control actions against the company and the Administrative Special Public Utilities Unit for an alleged detriment to the District property for a sum amounting to 95,142,786,544 Colombian pesos (approximately Ch$ 25,904 million), due to payments of the aforementioned to the District for public lighting between 1998 and 2004. On the 20 of that same month, CODENSA responded to the communication expressing its disagreement regarding the aforementioned figure and proposed a technical work instance, due to which several meetings have been held and the parties are waiting for the Comptrollers to issue a new report.

17. A Class Action has been filed by the people of the Municipality of Garzón, based on the fact that due to the construction of the hydroelectric project El Quimbo, their income from handicraft or entrepreneurial activities have been decreased by an average of 30%, which decrease was not considered when the project’s social-economic impact report was drafted. Currently, the number of plaintiffs amounts to 1,900 persons. Emgesa rejects these allegations based on: its allegation that the social-economic impact report complied with all the methodological criteria, including giving all interested parties the opportunity to comment on the report; the fact that the plaintiffs are not residents and for this type of people, compensation are only allowed for those whose income are mainly derived from their activity in the El Quimbo project’s direct area of influence; and that compensation must not be beyond the “first link” of the production chain and must be based on the status of the income indicators of each affected person.

In terms of the proceeding status, the conciliation hearing has been held, ending in failure. Afterwards, a resolution was sentenced decreeing the evidences requested by the parties, against which reconsideration recourses were filed, currently pending.

It is equally worth mentioning that on August 24, 2013 a document was signed by the Colombian State, Emgesa and the population of the area for the creation of a Governance Structure, a forum for dialogue and coordination that has the purpose of dealing in an efficient manner with the social and environmental conflicts generated in the development of the El Quimbo hydroelectric project and preventing any others that could arise. The amount involved in this proceeding is estimated to be approximately 93 thousand million Colombian pesos (approximately Ch$ 25,321 million).

18. The fiscal authority in Peru SUNAT questioned a Edegel in 2001, through Taxes and Fine Resolutions, on the way of depreciating assets valuation. SUNAT did not take into account the depreciation deduction corresponding to a greater part of the superior value allocated to assets in the voluntary re-evaluation performed in 1996, as an expense in the calculation of the company’s income tax. The amount of the appraisal rejected by SUNAT is related with financial interests paid by the company during the energy plants construction phase. The position of the taxing administration is that Edegel has not shown the following in a concluding manner: ( i ) that it is necessary to obtain

F-135

financing for building power plants that were later re-evaluated or ( ii ) that such financing has effectively been incurred upon. The company’s position is that SUNAT cannot demand such evidence in order to question the company re-evaluation performed, and that it corresponds to when such re-evaluation has been performed and not the historical value of goods. In this case, the valuation method considers that power plants of such magnitude are built with financing. If SUNAT did not agree with the valuation, it should have opposed its own appraisal, which it did not do. In February 2012, the Fiscal Court of Law (TF, as per its acronym in Spanish) sentenced in the case of the of the 1999 Income Tax accounting period, in favor of the company regarding two of its power plants and against the company in regards to four of them, based on the argument that only in the case of the first two, it was verified that there was financing. Thus the TF ordered SUNAT to calculate debt again according to the established criteria. In June 2012, Edegel paid the debt calculated by SUNAT (11 mm €); the amount will be recovered if there are favorable sentences in the following litigations Edegel has filed: (i) Administrative Contentious Claim to the Judicial Power against TF’s sentence, filed in May 2012 (it would correspond to a total return) ii) Partial appeal against the calculation that SUNAT has performed in order to comply with TF’s sentence, based on the fact that the recalculation that SUNAT has performed is incorrect, filed in July 2012 (it would correspond to a partial return). In reference to the Administrative Contentious Claim: In August 2013, the Judicial Power notified Edegel on the correction of procedure errors (Procedural Remediation Resolution). In this Resolution, the Judicial Power denied some of Edegel’s petitions regarding the grounds of its legal inadmissibility. Edegel filed an appeal to annul this Resolution, for being inappropriate (there is a lack of adequate motivation) and because it was issued out of time. In conclusion, the proceedings status is the following: For the 1999 accounting period, the annulment recourse that Edegel filed is pending resolution by the TF. For the 2000-2001 accounting periods, the company will file new evidence found in order to reduce the “part that would be lost” from 6 mm € to 1.3 mm €. The TF can declare that the evidence is inadmissible since it is out of time. The sum of these claims amounts to S./ 116,388,902 (approximately M$ 21,845,718).

19. In 2005, three lawsuits were filed against Endesa Chile, the Government of Chile and the Chilean General Water Affairs Bureau (the “DGA”), currently being treated as a single proceeding, requesting that DGA Resolution 134, which established non-consumptive water rights in favor of Endesa Chile to build the Neltume hydroelectric station project be declared null as a matter of public policy, with compensation for damages. Alternatively, damages were sought for the detriment allegedly sustained by the plaintiffs due to the loss of their status as riparian owners along Pirehueico Lake, as well as due to the devaluation of their properties. The defendants have rejected these allegations, contending that the resolution complies with all legal requirements, and that the exercise of this right does not cause any detriment to the plaintiffs, among other arguments. The sums involved in these suits are undetermined. This case was joined with two other cases: the first one is captioned “Arrieta v. the State and Others” in the 9th Civil Court, docket 15279-2005 and the second is captioned “Jordán v. the State and Others”, in the 10th Civil Court, docket 1608-2005. With regard to these cases, an injunction has been ordered against entering into any acts and contracts concerning Endesa Chile’s water rights related to the Neltume project. In terms of the status of this proceeding, the regular evidence period has ended and the parties have been summoned to hear the judgment. The resolution that summons the parties to hear the judgment is currently challenged by the State Defense Council, which seeks to leave without effect and in turn resolve the incident of accumulation of proceedings, which is pending to date.

20. During 2010, three lawsuits for damages were filed against Endesa Chile by plaintiffs alleging that they were affected by the flooding of the Bio-Bio River in Region VIII. The plaintiffs sued Endesa Chile for losses caused by its deficient operation of the Ralco hydroelectric station during the flood. These three cases were joined, and a first instance ruling has been issued which denies the claim filed in all its parts. The ruling was appealed and such appeal has not yet been reviewed by the court. The plaintiffs are required to produce legal evidence proving the causal link between the operation of the Ralco hydroelectric station during the floods and the damages that the plaintiffs claim they sustained as a result of deficient facility operation. Regarding the status of the proceedings, on March 27, 2012, there was a first instance judgment filed, which rejects the claim filed in all its parts. The plaintiff filed an appeal on March 12, 2013, where the Court of Appeals ordered proceedings to supplement the judgment, since there were exceptions and defenses that were not resolved in the first instance judgment. On May 2, 2013, the first instance Court of Law filed a supplementary judgment, referring to the exceptions and defenses that were not resolved in the first initial judgment. To date the proceeding is once again in the Court of Appeals of Concepción to be heard and in order to rule on the appeals filed. The amount involved in the three lawsuits currently pending against Endesa Chile is Ch$ 14,610 million. It is worth noting that the total risk of these proceedings is covered by an insurance policy.

F-136

21. In July and September of 2010, Ingeniería y Construcción Madrid S.A. and Transportes Silva y Silva Limitada, respectively, filed separate lawsuits against Endesa Chile and the Chilean General Water Affairs Bureau (the “DGA”), seeking to declare the annulment of DGA’s administrative resolution 134 that granted Endesa Chile’s water rights for the Neltume hydroelectric station. Similarly, Ingeniería y Construcción Madrid S.A. and Transportes Silva y Silva Limitada, respectively, each filed suits against DGA’s administrative resolution 732 that authorized the relocation of the collection point of such rights null as a matter of public policy. Ultimately, the plaintiffs attempted to demand payment for their water rights located in the area of influence of the hydraulic works for the future Neltume station. Endesa Chile has rejected these claims, contending that the plaintiffs are engaging in wrongful prosecution to prevent the construction of the station in order to obtain monetary compensation. As to the status of the two lawsuits, it is worth noting that in the complaint filed by Ingeniería y Construcción Madrid S.A. (Case No. 7036-2010), the discovery period has expired, and the parties have been summoned to hear judgment. Regarding the other lawsuit (Case No. 6705-2010), requesting the annulment of DGA resolution 732, on March 12, 2012 a ruling was issued that declared the proceeding as abandoned. Afterwards, on June 27, 2012, Ingeniería y Construcción Madrid, filed a similar claim before another Court of Law (Role C-15156-2012), proceeding in which the discussion period and the regular evidence period have ended. To date, the testimony obstruction alleged by Endesa Chile is still pending resolution, in order to obtain an extraordinary evidence stage, that allows rendering evidence of the witnesses that are still pending. On the other hand, in the legal suit filed by Transportes Silva y Silva Ltda, (Case No. 16025-2012), which contests DGA resolution 134, the proceeding was declared as abandoned. In another suit filed (Case No. 17916-2010), a similar request was made for the action to be declared as abandoned, however this request was denied. The plaintiff has filed an appeal against such sentence, which was accepted on May 10, 2013, declaring the proceeding as abandoned. The resolution is firm and executed. The amount of this proceeding is indeterminate.

22. On May 24, 2011, Endesa Chile was served with a lawsuit filed by 19 riparian owners along the Pirihueico Lake, seeking to declare null DGA Resolution 732, which authorized the relocation of water catchment rights for the Neltume station, from the Pirihueico Lake 900 meters downstream along Fui River. The plaintiffs seek to have this annulment annotated at the margin of the notarized instrument that memorialized DGA Resolution 732, which approved the transfer of the catchment. The plaintiffs also seek to have the recordation of said instrument struck from the waters registry, if entered, and to require the Chilean Government, the DGA and Endesa Chile to pay damages to the plaintiffs as a result of the challenged DGA resolution, seeking to reserve their right to indicate the type and amount of damages in subsequent legal proceeding. The claim is for an undetermined amount since the plaintiffs have requested that damages be determined in another suit, once the DGA’s administrative resolution is declared null and void. To date, the discussion period has ended and the evidence writ has been issued, which when received by the parties was the object of a replacement appeal filed by the plaintiff and an annulment petition filed by Endesa Chile, which were both rejected. The proceeding was suspended by mutual agreement until March 9, 2013, after which the proceeding began again. On August 20, 2013 the conciliation hearing that was pending happened, without arriving to a conciliation. To date, the regular evidence period has expired. The expert examination process is still pending.

23. The arbitration proceeding will be heard by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), hereinafter the Chamber, under the framework of the Bocamina Thermal Power Plant Extension Project Contract for the turnkey supply of a coal thermal generation plant, located in Coronel, Eighth Region of Chile, signed in July 2007 between Endesa Chile and the Consortium formed by Ingeniería y Construcción Tecnimont Chile Compañía Limitada, Tecnimont SpA, Tecnimont do Brasil Construcao e Administracao de Projetos Ltda., Slovenske Energeticke Strojarne a.s. (SES) and Ingeniería y Construcción SES Chile Limitada.

As a result of material breaches of the Consortium, for not finishing the works according to the terms and conditions agreed and within the time period stipulated in the Contract and its supplementary documents, on October 16, 2012 Endesa Chile went on, strictly complying with the conditions authorized in the Contract for such purpose, to collect the performance bonds, and in particular, those issued by Banco Santander Chile for US$ 93,992,554 (approximately Ch$ 49,309 million) and the one from Credit Agricole for US$ 18,940,294.84 (approximately Ch$ 9,936 million). To date Endesa Chile has only been able to collect the performance bonds issued by Banco Santander Chile.

Upon collection of the aforementioned performance bonds, Endesa Chile filed before the Chamber (Role 19015/CA) a request for arbitration to obtain the forced compliance of the Contract plus compensation for damages, and, as a subsidiary request, termination of the Contract with compensation for damages. In both cases, Endesa Chile reserved the right to file litigation regarding the amount and sum of the damages at a later stage. Endesa Chile based its claim

F-137

on the serious non-compliance of the Consortium, among which are the following: Material breach of the contractual date of the end of the works, the lack of payment to subcontractors and suppliers, which has forced Endesa Chile to take on part of their commitments, all of the above in order to avoid a situation of total stoppage of the works; material breach of the schedule of intermediate control stages agreed to; breach of the “Open Book” delivery time period of the works; as well as a lack of compliance with safety and environmental standards agreed to and the administrative standards proscribed for managing the Contract, among other material breaches by the Consortium.

In turn, SES filed legal actions before the Chamber (Role 1924/CA) requesting that the collection of the performance bonds that Endesa Chile carried out be declared illegal.

On January 4, 2013, Endesa Chile notified the Consortium of the anticipatory termination of the Contract due to material breach of its obligations, all of the above according to the norms prescribed in the Contract.

In terms of the status of the proceedings, in January 2013, the members of the Consortium SES- TECNIMONT, separately, have contested the request for arbitration filed by Endesa Chile and along with that, have filed a suit against Endesa Chile for US$ 1,294 million (approximately Ch$ 678,845 million), in Tecnimont’s case, and for US$ 15 million (approximately Ch$ 7,869 million), in SES’s case. On March 26, 2013, Endesa Chile answered the counterclaims filed against the company, requesting their rejection since they are inadmissible and inappropriate.

The proceeding filed by SES (Role 1924/CA) was consolidated with the arbitration proceeding described herein above. On June 21, 2013, upon request of the arbitration court, the bases of the procedural proposals or simultaneous procedure were filed in a clear and precise manner as well as their respective proposed schedules. On July 2, 2013, the procedural order that established the procedural rules whereby the proceeding will be conducted was approved. Dated December 2, 2013 the parties exchanged legal suit briefs. In turn, Endesa Chile requested in its Suit Brief that the arbitrational court declare the contractual non-compliance of the defendants, attributable to serious fraud or negligence by them or, subsidiary, to culpa grave, and that the contract term be recognized due to the cause of the “Contractor’s Non-Compliance”. Grounded on the above, it requests that the presentation of collecting the bond performance bonds given by Endesa Chile is according to the law and requests sentencing the defendants to fines and detriment, amounting in total to US$ 373,269,376, equal to approximatelyCh$ 195,821 million). After filing their claim briefs, the parties will be able to file their contest records. Taking into consideration the extension requested by Tecnimont the term to object the documents is pending to date.

24. On August 22, 2013, the companies Endesa Chile, Pehuenche and San Isidro filed before the Court of Appeals of Santiago an electrical illegality claim against the Chilean Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels(SEF), due to the decree of legal writ ORD No. 7230, dated August 7, 2013, which, relying on its interpretative and supervisory faculties, decreed that the consumption surpluses over the contracted supply that the distributing companies incur, in regards to the generators that are forced by means of a bid to carry out supply, must be covered with the surpluses in the bids of the other generating companies in reference to its distributors, for whose effect the distributors with surpluses can assign their surpluses to the distributors which have deficits, irrespective of the will of the respective generator, which is contrary to the Law and exceeds SEF’s faculties and authorities, resulting in an illegal resolution. In terms of the status of this proceeding, in the three illegality claims it was requested that an injunction be declared, which was denied in the San Isidro and Pehuenche suits and instead was granted in the Endesa Chile suit. With the aforementioned, the aggravated effects are suspended of the challenged SEF order. Finally, it was resolved in an effort to achieve the objective, that the effects of the injunction are communicated to all the companies. To date, it has been heard and is in agreement for sentencing.

25. In August 2013 the Superintendence of the Environment filed charges against Endesa Chile, due to a serious of violations to Exempt Resolution No. 206, dated August 2, 2007 and its supplementary and clarifying resolutions that environmentally qualify the “Bocamina Thermal Power Plant Extension Project (“Proyecto Ampliación Central Térmica Bocamina”). These violations are related to the cooling system discharge channel, not having operational the Bocamina I Desulphurizer, the non-forwarding of information, surpassing the CO limit for Bocamina I imposed for Bocamina II during January 2013, failures in the perimeter acoustic closing of Bocamina I, emitting noise, and not having technological barriers that impede massive entrance of Bio-mass in the power plant intake. Endesa Chile submitted a compliance program that was rejected. On November 27, 2013, the Superintendence of the Environment reformulated the charges filed adding two new ones to those already filed. Endesa Chile has presented its defense in December 2013, which partially recognizes some of these violations (in order to reduce the fine 25%, in case they are recognized) and contesting the rest. Endesa is waiting to hear the decision of the Superintendence of the

F-138

Environment. On the other hand, in December 2013, fishermen’s and algae collectors’ trade unions and related activities of Coronel, among others, filed two protection recourses against Endesa Chile before the Court of Appeals of Concepcion. The first is grounded on the fact that Endesa Chile would be operating Unit II of the Bocamina Thermal Power Plant, without having, in the opinion of the parties filing the claim, the environmental qualification for its operation, and second, that it would not have the Desulphurizing Plant operational for the operation of Unit I of the Bocamina Power Plant, according to what is demanded by the Environmental Qualification Resolution. The parties filing the claim attached a copy of the penalizing procedure pursued before the Superintendence of the Environment. The plaintiffs obtained in the first of these recourses a cautionary measure (temporary injunction against further process), which orders stopping the operation of the Generating Unit II of the Bocamina Power Plant. Endesa Chile, in turn, requested releasing this temporary injunction against further process, petition that was rejected by the Court. Similarly, it filed its response to both recourses, contributing background information for their rejection. Both recourses to date are accumulated pending their processing and pending there being heard by the Court of Appeals of Concepción and, therefore, Unit II continues to be detained.

26. In January and February, 2013, the Municipality of Huasco, and others, filed 4 protection recourses, against Agreement No. 17/2012, of the Honorable Ministers Committee that is referred to in Article No. 20 of Law 19,300, of the Terms and Conditions of the Environment, which based on a claim filed by Endesa Chile, against the Service Resolution of the Environmental Assessment that rejects the environmental authorization of the Punta Alcalde Thermal Project, accepts the claim ordering the project’s favorable environmental qualification. Such agreement was published on January 17, 2013, and in the opinion of the claimants violates the constitutional guarantee of living in an environment free from pollution. The four protection recourses correspond to Roles 59-2013, 7947-2013, 8413-2013 and 8795-2013, in terms of which their joint view was ordered one after the other. Once their view has been done, dated August 1, 2013 a resolution was sentenced that accepts the protection recourses and orders the Ministers’ Committee to hold a new hearing, in order to ground according to law, which is why the functioning of the Central Pta. Alcalde (Alcalde Power Plant) is authorized. Against such resolution, both the Government of Chile as well as Endesa Chile filed an appeal recourse, which to date is still pending sentencing before the Supreme Court.

The amount of these prudential procedures is undetermined.

The management of Enersis S.A. considers that the provisions registered in the Consolidated Financial Statements adequately cover the risks resulting from litigation and other proceedings described in this Note, which is why it does not consider that there are additional liabilities than those specified herein.

Given the characteristics of the risks covered by these provisions, it is impossible to determine a reasonable schedule of payment dates, in case there are any.

F-139

35.4 Financial Restrictions

Various of the company’s loan agreements, and those of some of its subsidiaries, include the obligation to comply with certain financial ratios, which is normal in contracts of this nature. There are also affirmative and negative covenants requiring the monitoring of these commitments. In addition, there are restrictions in the events-of-default clauses of the agreements which require compliance.

1. Cross Default

Some of the financial debt contracts of Enersis S.A. and of Endesa Chile contain cross default clauses. The syndicated loan of Endesa Chile under New York law signed in 2008 and which expires in June 2014, with an amount disbursed of US$200 million at the present time, makes no reference to its subsidiaries, so a cross default can only arise with respect to another own debt. In order to accelerate payment of the debt of this loan due to cross default with respect to another debt, the amount overdue of a debt must exceed US$50 million, or the equivalent in other currencies, and other additional conditions should be met including the expiry of grace periods (if any) and formal notification of the intention to accelerate the debt by creditors representing over 50% of the amount due under the agreement. In addition, Endesa Chile, in February 2013, and Enersis, in April 2013, signed credit line agreements under Chilean law that stipulate that cross default is triggered only upon default by the Debtor itself. In these credit lines, the amount of a debt past due must also exceed US$50 million or its equivalent in other currencies. Amounts drawn against these credit lines have not yet been disbursed since their signing. They mature in February 2016 and April 2016, respectively.

Regarding the bond issues of Enersis S.A. and Endesa Chile registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), commonly called “Yankee Bonds”, a cross default can be triggered by another debt of the same company or of any of their Chilean subsidiaries, for any amount overdue provided that the principal of the debt giving rise to the cross default exceeds US$30 million or its equivalent in other currencies. Debt acceleration due to cross default does not occur automatically but has to be demanded by the holders of at least 25% of the bonds of a certain series of Yankee Bonds. In addition, events of bankruptcy or insolvency of foreign subsidiaries have no contractual effects on the Yankee Bonds of Enersis S.A. or Endesa Chile. The Enersis S.A. Yankee Bond with the longest term matures in December 2026 and that of Endesa Chile in February 2097.

The Enersis S.A. and Endesa Chile bonds issued in Chile state that cross default can be triggered only by the default of the issuer, and debt acceleration requires the agreement of at least 50% of the holders of the bonds of a certain series.

2. Financial Covenants

Financial covenants are contractual commitments with respect to minimum or maximum financial ratios that the company is obliged to meet at certain periods of time (quarterly, annually, etc.). Most of the financial covenants of the Group limit the level of indebtedness and evaluate the ability to generate cash flows in order to service the companies’ debts. Various companies are also required to certify these covenants periodically. The types of covenants and their respective limits vary according to the type of debt.

The Series B2 domestic bonds of Enersis S.A. includes the following financial covenants, whose definitions and calculation formulas are set out in the respective contract:

- Equity: Minimum Equity must be maintained of Ch$602,161 million, a limit adjusted at the end of each year as established in the indenture. Equity is the sum of Equity attributable to the shareholders of Enersis and minority interests. As of December 31, 2013, Enersis S.A. equity was Ch$8,507,465 million.

- Debt Ratio: A debt ratio, being Total liabilities to Equity, should be no more than 2.24. Total liabilities are the sum of Total current liabilities and Total non-current liabilities, while Equity is the sum of Equity attributable to the shareholders of Enersis and minority interests. As of December 31, 2013, the Debt Ratio was 0.78.

F-140

- Unsecured Assets: The ratio of Unsecured assets to Unsecured total liabilities should be at least 1. Total Unsecured or free assets is the difference between Total assets and Total secured assets. Total unsecured or free assets consists of Total assets less the sum of Cash, Bank balances, Accounts receivable from related entities, current, Payments made in advance, current, Accounts receivable from related entities, non-current and Identifiable intangible assets, gross, while Total secured assets relates to assets pledged in guarantee. On the other hand, Unsecured total liabilities consist of the sum of Total current liabilities and Total non-current liabilities, less liabilities secured by collateral. As of December 31, 2013, this ratio was 2.02.

It is important to note that the undisbursed credit line in Chile includes other covenants such as leverage and debt repayment capacity ratios (Debt Ratio/EBITDA), while the Yankee Bonds are not subject to financial covenants.

As of December 31, 2013, the most restrictive financial covenant for Enersis S.A. was Debt Ratio/EBITDA with respect to local credit lines that expire in April 2016.

The Endesa Chile bonds issued in Chile include the following financial covenants whose definitions and calculation formulas are established in the respective indentures:

Series H

- Consolidated Debt Ratio: A consolidated debt ratio, being Financial debt to Capitalization, must be no more than 0.64. Financial debt is the sum of interest-bearing loans, current; interest-bearing loans, non-current; other financial liabilities, current; other financial liabilities, non-current; and other obligations guaranteed by the issuer or its subsidiaries; while Capitalization is the sum of financial liabilities, equity attributable to the shareholders of Enersis, and non-controlling interests. As of December 31, 2013, the ratio was 0.36.

- Equity: A minimum Equity of Ch$760,468 million must be maintained; this limit is adjusted at the end of each year as established in the indenture. Equity corresponds to Equity attributable to the shareholders of Enersis. As of December 31, 2013, the equity of Endesa Chile was Ch$2,651,968 million.

- Financial Expense Coverage: A financial expense coverage ratio of at least 1.85 must be maintained. Financial expense coverage is the quotient between i) the gross margin plus financial income and dividends received from associated companies, and ii) Financial expenses; both items refer to the period of four consecutive quarters ending on the quarter being reported. In the period ended December 31, 2013, this ratio was 7.35.

- Net Asset Position with Related Companies: A Net asset position must be maintained with related companies of no more than a hundred million dollars. The Net asset position with related companies is the difference between i) the sum of Accounts receivable from related entities, current, Accounts receivable from related entities, non-current, less transactions in the ordinary course of business at less than 180 days term, short-term transactions of associates of Endesa Chile in which Enersis S.A. has no participation, and long-term transactions of associates of Endesa Chile in which Enersis S.A. has no participation, and ii) the sum of Accounts payable to related entities, current, Accounts payable to related entities, non-current, less transactions in the ordinary course of business at less than 180 days term, short-term transactions of associates of Endesa Chile in which Enersis S.A. has no participation, and long-term transactions of associates of Endesa Chile in which Enersis S.A. has no participation. As of December 31, 2013, using the exchange rate prevailing on that date, the net asset position with related companies was a negative US$444.0 million, indicating that Enersis S.A. is a net creditor of Endesa Chile rather than a net debtor.

Series M

- Consolidated Debt Ratio: The consolidated debt ratio, which is Financial debt to Capitalization, must be no more than 0.64. Financial debt is the sum of interest-bearing loans, current; interest-bearing loans, non-current; other financial liabilities, current; and other financial liabilities, non-current; while Capitalization is the sum of financial liabilities, equity attributable to the shareholders of Enersis and non-controlling interests. As of December 31, 2013, the debt ratio was 0.35.

-  Equity: Same as for Series H.

-  Financial Expense Coverage Ratio: Same as for Series H.

F-141

The rest of Endesa Chile’s debt and the undisbursed credit lines include other covenants such as leverage and debt coverage ratios (debt/EBITDA ratio), while the Yankee Bonds are not subject to financial covenants.

In the case of Endesa Chile, the most restrictive financial covenant as of December 31, 2013 was the debt ratio requirement in the syndicated loan under New York law, which expires in June 2014.

In Peru, the debt of Edelnor only has one covenant, a Debt Ratio with respect to the domestic bonds whose final maturity is in January 2033. On the other hand, the debt of Edegel includes the following covenants: debt ratio, leverage ratio, and debt to equity and debt coverage (Debt Ratio/EBITDA) ratios. As of December 31, 2013, the most restrictive financial covenant for Edegel was the level of indebtedness corresponding to the second program of locally issued bonds, expiring in January 2014. Piura’s debt includes the following covenants: debt coverage and level of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2013, the most restrictive covenant on Piura debt was the indebtedness covenant from the Reserva Fría plant construction leasing agreement with Banco de Crédito del Perú which expires in July 2020.

In Brazil, the debt of Coelce includes compliance with the following covenants: debt coverage (Debt Ratio/EBITDA), level of indebtedness, and the interest coverage ratio (EBITDA/financial expenses). As of December 31, 2013, the most restrictive financial covenant of Coelce was the debt/EBITDA ratio, corresponding to the 2nd and 3rd domestic bond issues, whose final maturity is October 2018. The debt of Ampla includes the following covenants: debt coverage, (the debt/EBITDA ratio), the indebtedness ratio, and the interest coverage ratio (EBITDA/financial expenses). As of December 31, 2013, the most restrictive financial covenant for Ampla was the debt coverage ratio, corresponding to the 6th and 7th domestic bond issues, whose final maturity is June 2019.

In Argentina, Endesa Costanera has just one covenant, the maximum debt, corresponding to a loan from Credit Suisse First Boston International which matures in May 2014. The debt of El Chocón includes covenants related to maximum debt, net consolidated equity, interest coverage, debt coverage (debt/EBITDA) and a leverage ratio. In the case of El Chocón, as of December 31, 2013, the most restrictive financial covenant was the Debt/EBITDA ratio, corresponding to the syndicated loan which matures in September 2016. Meanwhile, Dock Sud currently has no debts involving financial covenants.

In Colombia, the debts of Codensa and Emgesa are not subject to compliance with financial covenants, a situation that also applies to the debt of the rest of the companies not mentioned in this Note.

Lastly, in most of the contracts, debt acceleration for non-compliance with these covenants does not occur automatically but is subject to certain conditions, such as a cure period.

As of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012, neither Enersis S.A. nor any of its subsidiaries were in default under their financial obligations summarized here or other financial obligations whose defaults might trigger the acceleration of their financial commitments, with the exception of our Argentine generation subsidiary Endesa Costanera at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

To date, Endesa Costanera has not made the last four payments on a supplier loan with Mitsubishi Corporation, which has a grace period of 180 days for each installment. The past-due payments fell due on March 30, 2012, September 30, 2012, March 31, 2013, and September 30, 2013 for a total of US$68 million, including principal and interest. Under the terms of the agreement, should Mitsubishi Corporation wish to accelerate the debt from this loan for a principal amount of US$141 million, it would have to give formal notification ten days prior to such acceleration. To date, Endesa Costanera has not received such notification from Mitsubishi Corporation. If Mitsubishi Corporation were to issue an official acceleration announcement, a total repayment of US$174 million from the loan would be enforceable under cross default and bankruptcy clauses, including the debt with Mitsubishi Corporation. It is important to note that negotiations on the terms of this loan have been ongoing throughout this time.

F-142

As of December 31, 2013, El Chocón would have been in breach of its covenant on the EBITDA/Financial expenses ratio for its US$19 million loan with Standard Bank/Deutsche/Itaú if it had not obtained a waiver in November 2013 allowing it to reduce the limit of the covenant from 3.5 to 2.5 for September and December 2013. A waiver was also signed on December 16, 2013 postponing the US$3 million payment due Standard Bank/Deutsche/Itaú on December 15, 2013 to January 14, 2014. At that time, another waiver was obtained postponing the obligation until February 15, when the terms of the loan are expected to be renegotiated.

None of this represents a risk of cross default or of another breach for Enersis.

35.5 Other Information

- Resolution 95/13 from the Argentine Energy Secretariat was published on March 26, 2013 making significant changes to the remunerations system for generating companies and other aspects of operations in the wholesale electricity market. Nevertheless, our Argentine subsidiary Endesa Costanera insisted on the need to consider in the short term adjustments in the values of tariffs. These tariffs reflect 2011 costs and need to be adjusted for 2013, and a methodology for updates that will allow for cost variations needs to be defined. Our Company shows a deficit in working capital until a response to these requests has been obtained, leading to problems in its short-term financial equilibrium. Endesa Costanera expects to correct the present situation depending on a favorable resolution of requests made to the Argentine government.

- On July 12, 2012, the Argentine electricity regulatory authority (Ente Nacional Regulador de la Electricidad de la República Argentina - ENRE), through its Resolution 183/2012, informed Edesur of the appointment of a “veedor” (a kind of inspector) for an extendable term of 45 days in order to control and verify all normal administrative actions linked to the normal provision of the public utility electricity distribution service by Edesur.

These administrative actions refer particularly to Edesur’s actions to comply with the legal and accounting requirements governing sufficiency of funds to pay all of the obligations assumed, as well as the adjustments needed to ensure that its actions comply with its obligations under its concession contract. Theveedor’s oversight was extended by ENRE Resolution 246/2012, 337/2012, and 34/2013; ENRE Provision 25/2013, Resolution 243/2013; and ENRE Provision 2/2014. The appointment of theveedor does not imply the loss of control by Enersis of Edesur. Edesur considers that this appointment and its justification are inappropriate and therefore it has brought legal proceedings against the ENRE each time the period has been extended.

F-143

36.  PERSONNEL FIGURES

Enersis personnel, including that of subsidiaries and jointly-controlled companies in the five Latin American countries where the Group is present, is distributed as follows as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012:

Country	12-31-2013
	Managers   and Main   Executives		Professionals and Technicians		Workers     and     Others		Total		Average for     the period
Chile		100		2,008		304		2,412	2,404
Argentina		39		2,860		1,054		3,953	3,688
Brazil		32		2,385		255		2,672	2,692
Peru		19		769		150		938	937
Colombia		26		1,542		31		1,599	1,580
Total		216		9,564		1,794		11,574	11,301

Country	12-31-2012
	Managers   and Main   Executives		Professionals and Technicians		Workers     and     Others		Total		Average for   the period(*)
Chile		83		1,953		297		2,333	2,322
Argentina		40		2,427		982		3,449	3,362
Brazil		34		2,368		260		2,662	2,741
Peru		20		691		159		870	841
Colombia		27		1,461		33		1,521	1,517
Total		204		8,900		1,731		10,835	10,783

Country	01-01-2012
	Managers   and Main   Executives		Professionals and Technicians		Workers     and     Others		Total		Average for   the period (*)
Chile		88		1,859		321		2,268	2,394
Argentina		43		2,401		883		3,327	3,242
Brazil		40		2,414		310		2,764	2,780
Peru		20		624		153		797	854
Colombia		27		1,422		34		1,483	1,526
Total		218		8,720		1,701		10,639	10,796

(*)Includes average staff at Cam and Synapsis up to the time those companies were sold. See Note 12.

F-144

37. SANCTIONS

The following companies belonging to the Group have received sanctions from the administrative authorities:

a) Subsidiaries

1.- Endesa Chile

– During the 2011 fiscal year, the Company was fined 1,380 UTA (Annual Tax Units), equivalent to ThCh$675,184 by the Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels (SEF) for the blackout that occurred on March 14, 2010. Endesa Chile filed an appeal against the measure with the Santiago Court of Appeals, which rejected the appeal on January 18, 2013 and upheld the fine. Endesa Chile then filed an appeal against this ruling with the Supreme Court who, on November 20, 2013, rejected the second appeal and once again upheld the fine, but reduced its amount to 1,246 UTA, equivalent to ThCh$609,623.

Closed.

– In the 2012 fiscal year, the Company was issued a fine, plus interest, totaling ThCh$13,151 by the Chilean Tax Service (SII) for the excessive use of tax credits for the 2010 tax year. The amount was paid on March 28, 2013.

Closed.

- During the 2012 fiscal year, the Company was fined 1,200 UTA (Annual Taxation Units), the equivalent of ThCh$587,117 by the Electricity and Fuels Superintendency (SEF) for the blackout that occurred on September 24, 2011. Endesa Chile filed a request for reconsideration with the SEF, which was denied in Exempt Resolution 703 of March 25, 2013, which also upheld the fine. The Company later filed an appeal challenging the ruling with the Santiago Court of Appeals, which has not yet viewed the appeal.

- In January 2013, Endesa Chile was notified of SEF Exempt Resolution 2496 fining the Company 10 UTA for violating Article 123 of Decree Law (DFL) 4/20,018 of 2006 due to its failure to report to the SEF the commissioning of its electricity facilities by the deadline provided for in that law. To clear the charges, Endesa Chile paid the fine in full.

Closed.

- In the first quarter of 2013, Endesa Chile was notified of three resolutions issued by the Health SEREMI (Regional Ministerial Office) of the Maule Region, Resolutions 1057, 085, and 970, which ruled on health summary proceedings RIT Nos. 355/2011, 354/2011, and 256/2011, respectively, imposing a 20 UTM fine for each of the proceedings. The fines were imposed for the following violations: Resolution 1057 penalizes a health violation of Decree 594 of 1999, Regulations on Basic Health and Environmental Conditions in the Workplace, specifically, at the Cipreses Plant facilities; this fine has been paid in full. Resolution 085 penalizes a violation of Executive Decree 90/2011, which requires a statement of the emissions made in 2009 and 2010 by a 20.8-kW-capacity Siemens-Schukertwerke A6 power generator located at the Bocatoma Maule Isla facility. This resolution is currently being challenged. Resolution 970 penalizes a violation of Executive Decree 90/2011, which requires a statement of the emissions made in 2009 and 2010 by a 34 kW Conex generator located at the Bocatoma Maule Isla facility. This resolution is currently being challenged. Total 60 UTM, equivalent to ThCh$2,446.

- Endesa received notification in September 2013 of ORD No. 603 issued by the Superintendency of the Environment (SMA) initiating sanction proceedings and filing charges against Endesa as Holder of the Expansion Project for Unit Two of the Bocamina Plant for a number of violations against environmental regulations and the RCA environmental regulation instrument. The sanction proceedings are the result of inspections conducted by SMA personnel on February 13 and 14 and on March 19, 26, and 27, 2013, at the Bocamina thermoelectric facilities. The inspections found a number of violations of Exempt Resolution 206 of August 2, 2007 (RCA 206/2007), which was clarified by Exempt Resolutions 229 of August 21, 2007 (RCA 229/2007) and 285 of October 8, 2007 (RCA 285/2007) giving environmental approval to this expansion project. The infractions consist primarily of (i) not having a discharge channel for the cooling system that extends 30 meters into the ocean from the edge of the beach; (ii) not having the Bocamina I Desulfurization unit in operation; (iii) not submitting the information requested by the Superintendency’s official on past records of on-line

F-145

emissions reports (CEM reports) since the startup of operations until the present time; (iv) exceeding the CO limit for Bocamina I set in the RCA for Bocamina II in January 2013; (v) the defects and gaps between panels in the Bocamina I permiter acoustic enclosure; (vi) noise emissions that exceed regulatory limits; and (vii) not having technological barriers that prevent biomass from pouring into the plant’s intake.

- Endesa, within the time frame allotted, submitted a compliance schedule that was rejected. On November 27, 2013, the SMA reformulated the charges filed, adding two new charges (failure to comply with RCA 206/2007, considered a grave violation, and failure to comply with the information requirement issued in Ord. UIPS 603, which files charges, also considered a grave violation).

Resolution of this sanction process is pending at this time.

2.- Pehuenche

- On October 6, 2011, the Securities and Insurance Superintendency (SVS) issued Exempt Resolution 545 fining the Pehuenche Directors that were involved in approving the Energy and Capacity agreement signed between the company and its parent Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. (Endesa) on November 19, 2007.

The following fines were applied:

i)   The Directors who were not members of the Directors’ Committee were fined for not having verified, according to the SVS resolution, that the Energy and Capacity sales agreement signed between Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A. and its parent Endesa on November 19, 2007 was signed under fair conditions normally prevailing on the market, and for having approved the Minutes of the Board Meeting stating that the Directors’ Committee Report had been read, when actually only the Minutes of that meeting had been read. Each Director received a fine of 300 UF (approximately ThCh$6,993).

ii)   Directors who were members of the company’s Directors’ Committee at the time the aforementioned agreement was signed were fined for not having prepared, according to the SVS resolution, the Report required under the regulation. Each Director received a fine of 400 UF (approximately ThCh$9,324).

The Directors have filed an appeal with the competent civil court after depositing 25% of the total amount of the fine with the General Treasury of the Republic. Therefore, the allegations and the fines are being studied by the ordinary courts of law, which have been informed of the Directors’ appeal and request for absolution in a summary proceeding.

On August 22, 2012, Endesa, as the first party, and Inversiones Tricahue and other minority shareholders as the second party, entered into a transactional agreement by which the minority shareholders withdrew all of their arbitrational, administrative, and criminal actions filed against Endesa and Pehuenche and their Directors on November 19, 2007. In return, Endesa agreed to rescind the November 19, 2007 capacity and energy agreement and to execute a new one under the same conditions, but with a price at marginal cost. The new agreement would be in effect from the date of its signing until December 31, 2021. Both parties also agreed to vote at the Pehuenche Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting to approve the rescinding of the former and the execution of the new agreement. Endesa agreed to pay Pehuenche the resulting price difference between the November 19, 2007 agreement price, which was in effect from January 1, 2008 to July 31, 2012, and the price difference between that paid from August 1, 2012, until the signing date of the new energy and capacity agreement, in accordance with the calculation methods and conditions set forth in the new agreement. On October 4, 2012, the Pehuenche Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting unanimously voted to rescind the former and execute a new agreement. On October 19, the Pehuenche Board of Directors voted to pay an interim dividend for the amount of the price differences it would receive from Endesa, which would take place on November 5, 2012. Nevertheless, the Directors had to pay the fine imposed by the SVS. The respective insurance policy covered these fines, and the sanctions were declared and paid into the Treasury.

F-146

- During the 2011 fiscal year, the Company was fined 602 UTA (Annual Tax Units), or approximately ThCh$294,537 by the Electricity and Fuels Superintendency (SEF) for the blackout that occurred on March 14, 2010. Pehuenche filed an appeal against the measure with the Santiago Court of Appeals, which rejected the appeal on January 18, 2013 and upheld the fine. Pehuenche filed an appeal against this ruling with the Supreme Court, which, on November 20, 2013, rejected the appeal and upheld the fine but reducing the amount to 421 UTA, equivalent to ThCh$205,890.

Closed.

- On October 2, 2013, the Securities and Insurance Superintendency (SVS) fined Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A. and its CEO for alleged violations of Article 54 of Law 18,046 “over the right of all shareholders to examine the annual report, balance sheet, inventory, minutes, ledgers, and external auditors’ reports during the 15 days prior to a company’s ordinary shareholders’ meeting.” It resolved the following:

To impose on Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A. and its General Manager, Lucio Castro Márqez, a fine of 150 UF each for violation of Article 54 of Law 18,046 and Article 61 of the Regulations on Corporations in effect at the time the events penalized occurred.

It was noted that the action contained in Article 30 of Decree Law 3,538 may be filed against the fine assessed or the amount of the fine with a civil court judge within 10 days of notification of the Resolution. Prior to that, the motion for reconsideration contained in Article 45 of that Decree Law may be filed. The motion must be filed with the Superintendency within five days of notification of the Resolution.

The fine was applied as a result of a claim made by Tricahue Inversiones S.A.’s against Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A. based on the fact that, on April 24, 2012, the Tricahue S.A. General Manager went to Pehuenche’s offices to examine the Minutes book of the company’s Board of Directors and stated that he was first required to sign a statement of confidentiality and indemnity in Pehuenche’s favor, which he considered illegal and arbitrary.

On August 24, 2012, Tricahue Inversiones S.A. withdrew its complaint filed against Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.

The Company and its General Manager, respectively, decided to exercise the action provided for under Article 30 of Decree Law 3,538, within the conditions and time frame required, to file a claim against the SVS resolution with the ordinary courts of law to have the resolution revoked.

3.- Chilectra S.A.

- During the period January 1 to December 31, 2013, Chilectra S.A. received seven fines totaling ThChCh$227,507 from the Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels (SEF) for different violations in connection with power supply and facilities. For the period ended December 31, 2012, Chilectra received 19 fines totaling ThCh$1,050,663 from the Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels for different violations in connection with power supply and facilities. In addition, Chilectra S.A. was fined ThCh$3,969 by the Metropolitan Region Health SEREMI for failure to comply with a regulation on the storage of materials.

4.- Edesur S.A.

- During the 2011 fiscal year, the Edesur S.A. received 182 fines from the Energy Regulatory Body ((Ente Regulador de Energía, ENRE) totaling Th$83,526 argentine pesos (approximately ThCh$6,719,610) for failure to comply with technical and commercial quality regulations

- For the period ended Decmber 31, 2012, the Company received 819 fines totaling Th$13,591 Argentine pesos (approximately ThCh$1,093,387) for the same violations as indicated above.

F-147

- For the period ended June 30, 2013, Edesur S.A. received 150 fines from the Energy Regulatory Body (ENRE) totaling Th$23,640 argentine pesos (approximately ThCh$1,901,822) for failure to comply with regulations on technical and commercial quality and on road and highway safety.

- From July 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013, Edesur S.A. received 111 fines from the Energy Regulatory Body (ENRE) amounting to Th$28,270 argentine pesos (approximately ThCh$2,274,302) for failure to comply with technical and commercial quality regulations, and for the amount of Th$1,536 argentine pesos (approximately ThCh$123,570) for failure to comply with road and highway safety regulations.

- From October 1 to December 31, 2013, Edesur S.A. received eight fines from the Energy Regulatory Body (ENRE) amounting to $2,766,029 argentine pesos (approximately ThCh$222,525) for failure to comply with technical and commercial quality regulations, and for an amount of $4,973,300 argentine pesos (approximately ThCh$400,099) for failure to comply with road and highway safety regulations.

5.- Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.

- For the year ended December 31, 2012, Hidroeléctrica El Chocón (HECSA) was fined Th$3,069 Argentine pesos (approximately ThCh$246,899) by the Jurisdictional Authority of the Limay, Neuquén, and Negro River Basins (Autoridad Jurisdiccional de las Cuencas de los Ríos Limay, NeuquénNegro, AIC) for failure to comply with certain obligations contained in the Concession Agreement. The company has filed the respective appeal, so the ruling is not yet final.

- The above agency also imposed a fine of Th$43 argentine pesos (approximately ThCh$3,459) on HECSA for violation of a duty to report.

- Finally, the Energy Regulatory Body (ENRE) imposed a fine of Th$20 argentine pesos (approximately ThCh$1,609) on the company. HECSA has filed an appeal.

6.- Endesa Costanera S.A.

- During the 2012 fiscal year and until June 30, 2013, the company was issued two fines for a total amount of Th$47,949 argentine pesos (approximately ThCh$3,857,464) by the General Customs Authority (Dirección General de Aduanas). Possible liability on the part of Mitsubishi is being assessed, in which case that amount could be claimed from this supplier. The ENRE also imposed two fines totaling Th$51 argentine pesos (approximately ThCh$4,103). The company has filed a protest.

7.- Central Dock Sud S.A.

- As a generating company on the Argentine wholesale electricity market (MEM), the company was fined Th$794.11 argentine pesos (approximately ThCh$63,886) in 2013 by the ENRE for the period from January to June 2012 for failure to comply with Appendix 24 of The Procedures (Resolution ex-S.E. 61/92 and its amendments and additions) due to unavailability of Data Links on the Real-time Operating System (SOTR, its acronym in Spanish).

8.- Ampla Energía S.A.

- For the period ended December 31, 2012, the company received one fine for Th$2,863 Brazilian reals (approximately ThCh$641,150) from the National Electrical Energy Agency (Agencia Nacional de Energía Eléctrica, ANEEL) for power consumption metering. In 2011, it received three fines totaling Th$7,079 Brazilian reals (approximately ThCh$1,585,296) for violation of telemarketing and energy sale tariff indicators. For the period ended December 31, 2012, Ampla was also fined Th$7,478 Brazilian reals (approximately ThCh$1,674,649) by the Federal Revenue Office (Secretaria de Receita Federal) for failure to meet tax obligations. The company has filed the respective appeals.

F-148

- The company received seven fines in 2013 totaling $29,810,687 Brazilian reals (approximately ThCh$6,675,979) from the National Electrical Energy Agency (ANEEL) due to problems with technical quality, erroneous evidence presented in inspections, and for other reasons. The company appealed, and four fines are still awaiting final rulings. The other fines were either revoked or paid, for a total of $143,601 Brazilian reals. Only two fines were received in 2012 totaling $3,557,786 Brazilian reals (approximately ThCh$796,743), for which we have paid $2,112,600 Brazilian reals.

- In 2013, the company received 19 fines totaling $120,204 Brazilian reals* (approximately ThCh$26,919) from the environmental agencies (IBAMA, Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis, ICM-Bio - Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade, INEA – Instituto Estadual de Ambiente and others) for unauthorized removal of vegetation, the death of animals through contact with our energy network, and construction in prohibited areas or without permission. The company filed appeals against almost all of the fines assessed, but no ruling has yet been given. Ampla has paid $66,310 Brazilian reals in fines. (* Clarification: The amount of some of the fines has not yet been determined; the amounts will be set after Ampla submits certain data.) The company had received 14 fines in 2012 for a total of $76,426 Brazilian reals (approximately ThCh$17,115).

- In 2013, the company received four fines totaling $24,234 Brazilian reals (approximately ThCh$5,427) from the Consumer Defense and Protection Agency (PROCON/RJ) due to problems in reimbursing improper charges and other irregularities. The company has filed appeals against all of the fines, and rulings are pending. Ampla had received three fines in 2012 for a total of $20,840 Brazilian reals (approximately ThCh$4,667); rulings on the appeals filed against these sanctions are also pending.

- The company received one fine in 2013 from the employee defense agencies (SRTE) due to problems with formalities. The company filed an appeal, and the ruling is pending. The labor agencies have not specified the amount of the fine, which it does only after analyzing the appeal. Ampla had received five fines in 2012, for which rulings are also pending after appeals filed by the company.

9.- Coelce

- The Company received three fines in 2011 totaling Th$1,397 Brazilian reals (approximately ThCh$312,849) from the National Electrical Energy Agency (ANEEL) for the same reasons it was fined in 2012.

- For the period ended December 31, 2012, the company received two fines totaling Th$689 Brazilian reals (approximately ThCh$154,297) from the National Electrical Energy Agency (ANEEL) for failure to comply with technical regulations.

- In 2013, the company received 32 fines totaling $34,877,282 Brazilian reals (approximately ThCh$7,810,540) from the National Electrical Energy Agency (ANEEL) or its local representative (ARCE) for accidents with third parties (there were seven), problems with technical quality, erroneous evidence submitted in inspections, irregularities with the Coelce Plus project, and other reasons. The company has filed appeals, and final decisions are pending on 26 sanctions. The other fines were either revoked or paid, for a total of $395,125 Brazilian reals. Coelce had received 24 fines totaling $53,810,352 in 2012 (approximately ThCh$12,050,478), for which we have paid $707,423 Brazilian reals; we are awaiting the final decision on 16 of the sanctions.

- The company was not fined by the environmental agencies in 2012 and 2013 (IBAMA, the Brazilian Institute for the Environment and Renewable Resources, and ICMBio, the Chico Mendes Institute for Conservation of Biodiversity).

F-149

- Coelce received four fines in 2013 totaling $21,837 Brazilian reals (approximately ThCh$4,890) from the Consumer Defense and Protection Agency (PROCON/CE) for alleged violations of consumer rights. The company filed appeals against the fines, and one has yet to be resolved. The other appeals were rejected, and Coelce paid $15,901 Brazilian reals in fines. Two fines for a total of $12,953 Brazilian reals were received in 2012, which we have paid.

- The company received two fines in 2013 from the employee defense agencies (SRTE) due to problems with formalities. The appeal filed by the company was unsuccessful, and we paid the amount of $9,694 reals. The company was not fined by these agencies in 2012.

10.-Cien

- The company received one fine in 2013 for $32,136 Brazilian reals (approximately ThCh$7,197) from the National Electrical Energy Agency (ANEEL) for a formality (a failure to submit documentation). The company appealed, and the decision is pending. The company was not fined by this agency in 2012.

- In 2012 and 2013, Cien was not fined for other matters (environmental, consumer, or labor).

- The company and its Board of Directors have not been subject to other sanctions from the SVS or from other administrative authorities.

11.- Edelnor S.A.A.

- In 2012, Edelnor S.A.A. was fined by the Peruvian Tax Administration (SUNAT) for income tax assessments on the years 2007 and 2008. The restated value of the fines at December 31, 2013 was S/18,318,568 (approximately ThCh$3,438,320). The appeals filed are pending resolution by the Tax Court.

- In the 2012 fiscal year, the OSINERGMIN (the Supervisory Agency for Investments in Energy and Mining) imposed 19 fines on Edelnor S.A.A. for S/463,645.77 (approximately ThCh$87,024) for failure to comply with technical and commercial quality standards. In 2011, it imposed 47 fines for a total of S/717,000 (approximately ThCh$134,578).

- In February 2013, Edelnor S.A.A. paid a fine of S/1,861.63 (approximately ThCh$349) to the SUNAT for failure to pay IGV (Peru’s value added tax) withholdings on time.

- During the 2013 fiscal year, the OSINERGMIN imposed 23 fines totaling S/2,544,177.91 (approximately ThCh$477,532) on Edelnor S.A.A. for alleged failure to comply with technical and commercial standards.

- In October 2013, Edelnor S.A.A. was fined by the SUNAT for issues with the determination of its 2009 income tax. The amount of the fines, restated at December 31, 2013, were S/9,995,290 (approximately ThCh$1,876,075). Edelnor S.A.A. protested the fines, and the case is pending resolution.

12.- Edegel S.A.A.

- In April 2011, Edegel S.A.A. was fined by the SUNAT (the Peruvian Tax Administration) for issues with the determination of its 2006 income tax. The amount of the fines, restated at December 31, 2013, was S/.9,502,978 (approximately ThCh$1,783,670). The company has filed an appeal, which is pending resolution by the Tax Court.

- In February 2012, the SUNAT ordered Edegel S.A.A. to pay S/.38,433,190.24 (ThCh$7,213,752) for omitted taxes plus interest and penalties in connection with an audit of its 1999 income tax that began in January of 2006. Edegel S.A.A. paid the penalty imposed by the SUNAT and filed an administrative claim disputing the assessment; a decision on the claim is pending.

F-150

- In August 2012, Edegel S.A.A. received a fine for a total of S/18,250 (5 Tax Units, UIT, or approximately ThCh$3,425) from the Agency for the Supervision of Investment in Energy and Mining (OSINERGMIN) for the following violations: (i) CCIT violations: incorrectly calculating indicators and the compensation amount for voltage quality in the first half of 2011; (ii) not having met the deadline for submitting information on product quality for the same period; and (iii) having submitted empty RDI and RIN extension files.

- In April 2013, Edegel S.A.A. received the following fines by the OSINERGMIN (the Supervisory Agency for Investments in Energy and Mines: (i) S/7,604.57 (approximately ThCh$1,427) for failure to perform maintenance in a timely fashion on its thermal generation units for the last quarter of 2008; (ii) S/200,941.48 (approximately ThCh$37,716) for failure to perform maintenance in a timely fashion on its hydraulic generation units for the last quarter of 2008; (iii) S/40,700 (approximately ThCh$7,639) (11 Tax Units, UIT) for failure to submit technical justification in a timely fashion for the second quarter of 2008; and (iv) S/106,073.17 (approximately ThCh$19,909) for failure to have its generation unit available after having been notified that it was required by the SEIN for the fourth quarter of 2008. Edegel S.A.A. has not protested fines (i) and (iv), and it will pay them to take advantage of early payment benefits. It has, however, appealed sanctions (ii) and (iii), and a ruling by OSINERGMIN is pending.

- In May 2013, Edegel S.A.A. was fined by the SUNAT for issues with the determination of its 2007 tax payments. The amount of the fine, restated at December 31, 2013, was S/8,751,959 (approximately ThCh$1,642,707). An appeal filed with the Tax Court is pending.

- In June 2013, Edegel S.A.A. was notified by Electroperú S.A. of a penalty applied under contract no. 132991, “Additional Generation Capacity Service through Conversion of Equipment to the Dual Generation System.” The penalty, amounting to S/481,104.53 (approximately ThCh$90,301), was applied for breach of the conditions for executing the service offered under that contract.

- In July 2013, Edegel S.A.A. was fined S/453.86 (approximately ThCh$85) by the Supervisory Agency for Investments in Energy and Mines (OSINERGMIN) for failure to perform maintenance on its hydraulic generation units in a timely fashion as required under number 6, “Procedure for Overseeing Availability and the Operating Conditions of SEIN Generating Units.” As the company paid the fine prior to the 15-day deadline, the fine was reduced to S/340.40 (approximately ThCh$64).

- In July 2013, Edegel S.A.A. was fined S/4,070 (approximately ThCh$764) by the Supervisory Agency for Investments in Energy and Mines (OSINERGMIN) for failure to submit the pertinent technical justification in a timely fashion as required under number 6 of the “Procedures for Overseeing Availability and the Operating Conditions of SEIN Generating Units.” As the company paid the fine prior to the 15-day deadline, the fine was reduced to S/3,052.50 (approximately ThCh$573).

- In November 2013, Edegel S.A.A. was fined S/37,000 (approximately ThCh$6,945 or 10 Tax Units – UIT) by the Callahuanca District Municipality (MDC) in Municipal Resolution 060-2013. The MDC imposed the sanction for failure to submit the technical inspection report on multidisciplinary civil defense safety as required under Law 29664 and its regulations.

- In November 2013, Edegel S.A.A. was fined by the SUNAT for issues with the determination of its 2008 tax payments. The amount of the fine, restated at December 31, 2013, was S/1,573,170 (approximately ThCh$295,278). The appeal filed is pending resolution by the SUNAT.

- In December 2013, Scotiabank Perú S.A.A., which whom Edegel S.A.A. has signed a lease agreement for the Santa Rosa Project, was fined by the SUNAT for duties allegedly unpaid in an import operation. The amount of the fine, restated at December 31, 2013, was S/12,701,508 (approximately ThCh$2,384). Scotiabank Perú S.A.A. will file the respective appeal in January 2014.

F-151

13.- Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A.

- In January 2008, Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A. was fined S/185,000 (approximately ThCh$34,724 or 50 Tax Units – UIT) by the Supervisory Agency for Investments in Energy and Mines (OSINERGMIN) for failure to comply with the provisions of the Regulations for Environmental Protection in Hydrocarbon Activities approved in Supreme Decree 046-93-EM. The fine was paid in May 2013.

- In October 2011, Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A. was fined by the SUNAT for issues with the determination of its 2008 income tax. The amount of the fine, restated at December 31, 2013, was S/30,231 (approximately ThCh$5,674). The appeal filed is pending resolution by the Tax Court.

- In September 2012, Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A. was fined by the SUNAT for issues with the determination of its 2008 income tax for parities not domiciled in Peru. The amount of the fine, restated at December 31, 2013, was S/239,015 (approximately thCh$44,862). The appeal filed is pending resolution by the Tax Court.

- In November 2012, Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A. was fined S/13,140 (approximately ThCh$2,466 or 3.60 Tax Units – UIT) by the Supervisory Agency for Investments in Energy and Mines (OSINERGMIN) for the following infractions: (i) failure to comply with the requirements of Article 49 of the Regulations for Sales of Liquid Fuels and other Hydrocarbon Products (approved in Supreme Decree 045-2011-EM) and Article 59 of the Regulations for Safe Hydrocarbon Storage (approved in Supreme Decree 052-93-EM), and (ii) presenting false information in Sworn Statement 967-19681-20111018-102524-74 regarding questions 2.1 and 2.10 of the questionnaire applicable to direct consumers of liquid fuels. The fine was paid.

- In February 2013, Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A. was fined S/7,005 (approximately ThCh$1,315) relating to regulatory payments for the years 2004 and 2005. The fine was paid.

- In August 2013, Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A. was fined S/15,873 (approximately ThCh$2,979 or 5.72 Tax Units – UIT) by the Supervisory Agency for Investments in Energy and Mines (OSINERGMIN) for the following violations of the Procedure for Overseeing Technical Quality Standards for Electrical Services and its Base Methodology (“NTCSE”): (i) having violated the CMRT indicator regarding compliance with measurements required under the NTCSE based on voltage measurements reported for the second half of 2011; and (ii) having violated the CCII indicator regarding correctly calculating indicators and compensation amounts from service interruptions in the second half of 2011. The fine was paid in September 2013.

- In August 2013, Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A. was notified by the Ministry of Energy and Mines of a penalty of S/691,500 (approximately ThCh$129,792) imposed under the “Talara Plant Cold Reserve Contract (CT Malacas3)” due to delays in the commercial startup of the Talara Cold Reserve Generation Plant.

- In September 2013, Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A. learned of Resolution No. 1 issued by Coactive Executor OSINERGMIN applying a penalty of 42.17 UIT, equivalent to S/156,029 (approximately ThCh$29,286) for failure to hold average stocks of LPG during the months of January, February, March, April, May, and June 2004. On October 21, the Coactive Executor suspended the Coactive Execution proceedings for collection on the fine.

- On September 24, 2013, Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A. was fined S/3,700 (approximately ThCh$694 or 1 Tax Unit – UIT) by the Supervisory Agency for Investments in Energy and Mines (OSINERGMIN) because EDAGSF was not declared in the Extranet System in F08 format, violating the Procedure for Overseeing Implementation and Operation of the Systems for Automatic Rejection of Generation Loads. As the fine was paid within fifteen (15) days of notification, it was reduced by 25% to S/2,775 (approximately ThCh$521).

F-152

14.- Chinango S.A.C.

- In October 2010, Chinango was fined by the District Municipality of San Ramón regarding the Alcabala tax imposed on the transfer of certain assets in the Simple Reorganization that took place between Edegel S.A.A. and Chinango S.A.C. and which went into effect on May 31, 2009. The amount of the fine, restated at December 31, 2013, was S/1,643,868 (approximately ThCh$308,547). The appeal filed is pending resolution.

- In May 2012, Chinango S.A.C. received a fine totaling S/40,150 (approximately ThCh$7,536 or 11 Taxation Units, UIT) from the Supervisory Agency for Investments in Energy and Mining (OSINERGMIN) for the following violations: (i) failure to meet the deadline for submitting information on product quality in NTCSE source files; and (ii) having submitted RIN and CI1 files with errors (incorrect information) in accordance with the Electricity Concessions Law. The fine was paid.

- In August 2012, Chinango S.A.C. received a fine totaling S/18,250 (approximately ThCh$3,425 or five Taxation Units, UIT) from the Supervisory Agency for Investments in Energy and Mining (OSINERGMIN) for the following violations: (i) CCIT indicator violations; (ii) failure to submit information in a timely fashion; and (iii) having submitted two empty RIN and RD files. The fine was paid.

- In August 2012, Chinango S.A.C. received a fine totaling S/29,200 (approximately ThCh$5,481 or eight Taxation Units, UIT) from the Appeals and Sanctions Court of the Agency for the Supervision of Investment in Energy and Mining (OSINERGMIN) when it ruled as groundless the appeal filed by Chinango S.A.C. against Executive Management Resolution No. 014801 penalizing the failure to comply with the “Procedure for Overseeing the Technical Quality Standard for Electricity Services and its Base Methodology” (NTCSE) in the first half of 2010 and confirmed the Resolution in all of its details. The fine was paid.

- In January 2013, Chinango S.A.C. received a fine totaling S/367,915 (approximately ThCh$69,056) from the SUNAT for issues with the determination of its 2010 income tax. The company challenged the measure despite paying a reduced fine in February 2013. The appeal filed is pending resolution by the Tax Court.

- In June 2013, Chinango S.A.C. was notified through Coactive Execution Resolution 0398-2012 of a fine of S/3,800 (approximately ThCh$713) imposed by the Supervisory Agency for Investments in Energy and Mines (OSINERGMIN) for the following infractions: (i) failure to comply with the CCII indicator in the first half of 2010 as required under paragraph A of number 5.2.2 of the “Procedure for Overseeing the Technical Quality Standard for Electrical Services and its Base Methodology”; (ii) failure to comply with the CPCI indicator in the first half of 2010 as required under paragraph C) of number 5.2.2 of the “Procedure for Overseeing the Technical Quality Standard for Electrical Services and its Base Methodology”; and (iii) submitting empty service interruption reports (RIN and RDI files) for the first half of 2010 despite the interruptions affecting its customers, as required under Article 31 of the Electricity Concession Law.

- In September 2013, Chinango S.A.C. was notified through Managerial Electrical Oversight Resolution No. 19693 issued by the Supervisory Agency for Investments in Energy and Mining (OSINERGMIN) of a fine of S/1,850 (approximately ThCh$347 or 0.50 Tax Units – UIT) for: (i) failure to submit voltage quality information in a timely fashion in the first half of 2012. As the fine was paid within fifteen (15) days of notification, it was reduced by 25%.

15.- Emgesa

- In Resolution 110 of August 2012, the Colombian Institute of Anthropology and History—ICANH—imposed a fine of approximately US$55,000 (approximately ThCh$28,854) on the company for not complying with standards and established procedures in cases of archaeological findings, as occurred between April 3 and April 6, 2011 in the area of the El Quimbo Hydroelectric Project. Emgesa filed an appeal against the resolution, but ICANH confirmed the fine in Resolution 149 of October 22, 2012.

F-153

16.- Codensa

- During 2011, the Superintendency of Public Household Services imposed the following fines on Codensa: 1) In Resolution 20112400025515 of September 5, 2011, it fined the company CP41,200,000 Colombian pesos (approximately ThCh$11,217) for erroneously cutting off electricity for failure to make installment payments for use of financial services, interest payment Codensa Hogar; 2) in Resolution 20112400029265 of October 18, 2011, it fined the company CP26,780,000 Colombian pesos (approximately ThCh$7,291) for erroneously cutting off the client’s electricity after the financial service had been paid in the financial company’s offices.

- In 2012, the Superintendency of Public Household Services imposed the following fines on Codensa: 1) In Resolution 20122400001045 of January 30, 2012, a fine for CP21,424,000 Colombian pesos (approximately ThCh$5,833) for violating the tariff system by erroneously calculating the unit cost for the periods November-December 2009 and January-February 2010 due to an error in the information on ownership of the asset; 2) in Resolution 20122400022555 of July 17, 2012, the Superintendency imposed a fine of CP45,336,000 Colombian pesos (approximately ThCh$12,343) on Codensa for failure to comply with number 6.2.3 of the Appendix to CREG General Resolution 070, amended by CREG Resolution 096 of 2000.

- In April 2013, Codensa paid a penalty of CP32,207,414 Colombian pesos (approximately ThCh$8,769) applied by the Industry and Commerce Superintendency in accordance with Resolution 1792 of January 26, 2011 for violation of the personal data protection regulations contained in Law 1266 of 2008.

- In 2013, as a result of a claim filed by the company Tubotec S.A.S., the Superintendency of Public Household Services applied a penalty of CP167,743,200 Colombian pesos (approximately ThCh$45,671) on Codensa for failure to comply with capacity quality indicators.

- In November 2013, Codensa paid a fine of CP22,668,000 Colombian pesos (approximately ThCh$6,172) imposed by the Consumer Protection Investigation Bureau of the Industry and Commerce Superintendency in accordance with Resolution 57393 of September 30, 2013. The penalty was due to an error made by the company’s invoicing service for having erroneously collected on a loan from a claimant who reported the mistake on several occasions.

b) Joint ventures

1.-Transquillota

- During the 2012 fiscal year, the company Transquillota, in which Endesa Chile and Colbún each hold a 50% stake, was audited by the Chilean tax service (SII) under an expense verification program, as the SII considers that certain entries such as depreciation of fixed assets were not properly handled. An administrative reconsideration for the Supervisory Review (RAF) was submitted explaining the differences. The SII accepted the company’s explanations and reduced the interest and fines payable to ThCh$19,208, which the company paid on March 27, 2013. Endesa paid only 50% of the amount, or Thch$9,604.

Closed.

The Company and its Board of Directors have not received other fines from the SVS nor from other administrative authorities.

F-154

38. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

ENERSIS

- On January 14, the members of the Enersis S.A. Board of Directors unanimously voted to submit a voluntary public offer to the shareholders of its subsidiary Companhia Energética do Ceará (Coelce), domiciled in the Federative Republic of Brazil, to purchase the shares of that company.

Coelce is already a subsidiary of Enersis S.A., controlled and consolidated through the company Endesa Brazil S.A. which at this time owns 58.87% of the shares issued by Coelce; 91.66% are common shares, and 6.26% are Class A preferred shares.

Enersis S.A. (the “Offerer), with the assistance of Banco Itaú BBA S.A. (Itaú BBA) as intermediary, will publish when appropriate the prospectus (Edital) of the public offer to purchase all of the shares of all of the series issued by Coelce (ordinary, Class A preferred, and Class B preferred) that are in circulation on the market at a price of R$49 Brazilian reals. This price will be payable at sight on February 20, 2014 in the legal tender of Brazil, in accordance with the rules established in Brazilian legislation and regulations, and the public offer will be governed by the stipulations in the Instrução CVM No. 361/2002. The price represents a premium of 20.1% over the average price, weighted by volume, of the Class A preferred shares over the previous 30 stock trading days (until January 13, 2014, inclusive).

If, during the execution of this public offer, all of Coelce’s shareholders sold their shares to Enersis S.A., the company would have to disburse approximately Ch$340,212 million Chilean pesos, equivalent to US$645 million, at an exchange rate of 527.53 pesos per dollar.

This transaction, as a purchase of a stake that is already controlled by the company, does not affect the Income Statement for Enersis and will not change the values of Coelce’s assets and liabilities recorded on the Enersis consolidated balance sheet at the time of the transaction. Any difference arising between the values recorded by Coelce and the value that Enersis will disburse in the acquisition will be recorded in Equity (other reserves) at the time that the transaction is completed. From that time on, the effects of the larger stake will be reflected in the Offerer’s Income Statement.

The deadline for accepting the public offer will be 33 consecutive days as of the publication of the prospectus (Edital) in the Brazilian media. The publication will take place on January 16, 2014, and the auction from the public offer must be held at 4:00 p.m. (Brazilian time) on February 17, 2014. The other terms and conditions of the public offer will be disclosed in the offer’s Edital, which will be published in a timely manner.

Other reports available to interested parties are the assessment report on Coelce (Laudo de Avaliação) prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers Corporate Finance & Recovery Ltda. de Brasil, together with the Edital of the public offer, theOferta Pública Voluntária para Aquisição de Ações Ordinárias, Ações Preferenciais A e Ações Preferenciais B em Circulação de Emissão da Companhia. These reports will be available starting on January 14, 2014 at the headquarters of Enersis S.A., Coelce, the Banco Itaú BBA, the BM/FBOVESPA S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros - and of the CVM, as well as on the following web sites: www.enersis.cl; www.coelce.com.br/ri.htm (click on “OPA Enersis”); http://www.itaubba.com.br/portugues/atividades/prospectos-to-iubb.asp, www.cvm.gov.br, and www.bmfbovespa.com.br. The list of Coelce’s shareholders will also be available at the headquarters of the entities mentioned above.

This operation is part of the process for the use of the almost US$2.4 billion in cash obtained in the capital increase approved at the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on December 20, 2012 and was satisfactorily completed with the subscription of all of the shares available in March 2013.

F-155

ENDESA CHILE

- On January 29, 2014, the company reported as an essential fact that the Environmental Superintendency, in Exempt Resolution 39 of January 28, 2014, ordered Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A., among other provisional measures indicated in that resolution, to shut down, totally and temporarily, the Bocamina Plant Unit One project for 15 consecutive days. This provisional measure could be renewed or lifted before the completion of the 15 days should new information so warrant, as authorized by the Third Environmental Court on that date and as stipulated in Letter c) of Article 48 of the Organic Law of the Environmental Superintendency.

The financial effects of the shutdown of the Bocamina I Thermal Plant will depend on how long the measure is in effect. The extent of the effects is currently being assessed by the company.

On January 31, 2014, the company reported the following essential fact:

Regarding the essential fact reported on December 17, 2013, in which, in addition to reporting the shutdown of the Bocamina II Thermal Plant due to the reasons stated in the report, we announced that the financial effects of the shutdown would be assessed by the company, we hereby report as an essential fact that the effects of the beginning of the shutdown period, from December 17, 2013 to January 30, 2014, are assessed as a total loss of US$31 million in the company’s contribution margin.

In addition, the company will continue to evaluate and report on the financial effects of the shutdown of the Bocamina II Thermal Plant throughout its duration.

On February 6, 2014, the company reported the following essential event:

Regarding the essential event of January 29, 2014, the Environmental Superintendency, in Exempt Resolution 59 of February 6, 2014, has lifted the provisional measures ordered in Exempt Resolution 39 of January 28, 2014, including both the total temporary shutdown of the Bocamina Thermoelectric Plant Unit One project and the other corrective, safety, and control measures decreed, as stipulated in Letter c) of Article 48 of the Organic Law of the Environmental Superintendency.

The company will proceed to implement the provisional measures ordered by the authorities and will restart operations at Unit One of the Bocamina Thermoelectric Plant as soon as possible, in coordination with the CDEC.

No other subsequent events of significance have occurred between January 1, 2014 and the date these financial statements were issued.

F-156

39. ENVIRONMENT

Environmental expenses as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 are as follows:

Company Incurring the Cost	Project	12/31/2013 ThCh$		12/31/2012 ThCh$		12/31/2011 ThCh$
Endesa Chile S.A.	Studies, monitoring, laboratory analysis, removal and final disposal of solid waste at hydroelectric power stations (HPS) and thermoelectric power stations.		1,996,818		2,298,344		2,104,631
Chinango	Air and climate protection, waste water management, soil and water recovery, noise and vibration reduction, biodiversity and landscape protection		-		451,030		211,544
Edegel S.A.	Environmental monitoring, waste management, mitigation, research and development, protection from radiation, vibration reduction, and restoration		417,966		915,325		547,979
Codensa	Environmental management of transformers		-		-		71,667
Chilectra	Weed removal on substation premises, tree pruning in AT, garden maintenance, oil-contaminated solids		1,537,004		1,324,061		1,681,800
Edesur S.A.	Final disposal of waste and contaminants		-		-		56,185
Compañía de Transmisión del Mercosur S.A.	ISO 14,001 and ENRE Resolution 57/2003 (public safety) audit, environmental monitoring, and updating of  environmental standards		-		-		15,100
Transportadora de Energía S.A.	ISO 14,001 and ENRE Resolution 57/2003 (public safety) audit, environmental monitoring, and updating of  environmental standards		-		-		16,387
Total			3,951,788		4,988,760		4,705,293

40. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ON SUBSIDIARIES, SUMMARIZED

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the summarized financial information of our principal subsidiaries under IFRS is as follows

	12-31-2013
	Type of Financial Statements	Current Assets ThCh$		Non-current Assets ThCh$		Total Assets ThCh$		Current Liabilities ThCh$		Non-current Liabilities ThCh$		Total Liabilities ThCh$		Revenues       ThCh$		Costs   ThCh$		Profit (Loss) ThCh$
Chilectra S.A.	consolidated		192,097,250		1,210,687,971		1,402,785,221		(228,651,498)		(43,735,685)		(272,387,183)		975,023,630		(748,871,802)		226,151,828
Inmobiliaria Manso de Velasco Ltda.	consolidated		28,152,699		38,156,192		66,308,891		(3,943,277)		(460,705)		(4,403,982)		17,831,676		(8,884,221)		8,947,455
ICT Servicios Informáticos Ltda.	separate		4,335,716		230,392		4,566,108		(3,866,062)		(598,655)		(4,464,717)		5,445,388		(6,687,243)		(1,241,856)
Inversiones Distrilima S.A.	separate		24,511,831		45,211,675		69,723,506		(365,284)		-		(365,284)		9,804,331		-		9,804,331
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A.	separate		97,291,243		487,752,640		585,043,883		(135,168,908)		(213,494,034)		(348,662,942)		414,816,662		(364,303,365)		50,513,297
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.	separate		599,190,333		3,270,781,264		3,869,971,597		(658,181,692)		(697,429,550)		(1,355,611,242)		1,047,707,545		(785,327,837)		262,379,708
Endesa Eco S.A.	separate		-		-		-		-		-		-		48,938,968		(24,522,864)		24,416,104
Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.	separate		33,988,505		217,379,509		251,368,014		(35,867,416)		(41,936,800)		(77,804,216)		192,839,780		(78,347,987)		114,491,793
Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A.	separate		-		-		-		-		-		-		211,140,517		(157,918,033)		53,222,484
Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A.	separate		74,282,837		428,366,270		502,649,107		(173,508,052)		(25,716,898)		(199,224,950)		74,083,557		(66,581,674)		7,501,883
Soc. Concesionaria Túnel El Melón S.A.	separate		12,248,481		10,007,003		22,255,484		(3,182,462)		(4,599,826)		(7,782,288)		10,301,994		(4,155,242)		6,146,752
Endesa Argentina S.A.	separate		1,796,454		47,229,472		49,025,926		(811,271)		-		(811,271)		2,541,610		-		2,541,610
Endesa Costanera S.A.	separate		30,153,983		112,614,109		142,768,092		(162,244,700)		(9,452,339)		(171,697,039)		94,887,720		(118,255,734)		(23,368,015)
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	separate		14,903,801		132,833,440		147,737,241		(21,069,801)		(45,717,551)		(66,787,352)		36,686,734		(25,681,727)		11,005,007
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	separate		321,051,970		1,707,315,179		2,028,367,149		(229,533,581)		(864,631,943)		(1,094,165,524)		639,770,439		(408,981,567)		230,788,872
Generandes Perú S.A.	separate		214,375		202,971,423		203,185,798		(10,853)		-		(10,853)		33,470,743		-		33,470,743
Edegel S.A.A.	separate		97,736,569		678,847,872		776,584,441		(98,497,242)		(220,222,435)		(318,719,677)		256,345,889		(175,933,003)		80,412,886
Chinango S.A.C.	separate		7,048,693		104,913,829		111,962,522		(11,790,622)		(36,119,840)		(47,910,462)		27,707,823		(17,541,290)		10,166,533
Endesa Brasil S.A.	separate		344,196,221		705,840,306		1,050,036,527		(126,688,865)		(6,740,678)		(133,429,543)		164,810,727		-		164,810,727
Central Generadora Termoeléctrica Fortaleza S.A.	separate		75,478,418		138,518,317		213,996,735		(38,792,313)		(20,323,740)		(59,116,053)		168,871,371		(128,522,514)		40,348,857
Centrais Elétricas Cachoeira Dourada S.A.	separate		37,111,472		98,093,370		135,204,842		(10,185,205)		(1,740,968)		(11,926,173)		117,445,188		(31,295,855)		86,149,333
Compañía de Interconexión Energética S.A.	separate		27,403,174		229,743,261		257,146,435		(104,368,046)		(4,803,839)		(109,171,885)		63,698,185		(39,697,135)		24,001,050
Compañía de Transmisión del Mercosur S.A.	separate		16,026,611		3,663,555		19,690,166		(5,912,346)		(17,396,804)		(23,309,150)		2,088,071		(6,955,882)		(4,867,810)
Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	separate		158,243,822		631,616,602		789,860,424		(141,369,115)		(250,012,380)		(391,381,495)		688,980,884		(647,611,232)		41,369,652
EN-Brasil Comercio e Servicios S.A.	separate		4,933,651		914,231		5,847,882		(3,967,856)		-		(3,967,856)		6,569,786		(5,089,559)		1,480,227
Ampla Energía E Servicios S.A.	separate		254,893,771		1,022,078,671		1,276,972,442		(168,894,084)		(499,364,121)		(668,258,205)		947,892,717		(822,029,094)		125,863,623
Ampla Investimentos E Servicios S.A.	separate		-		-		-		-		-		-		8,249,870		-		8,249,870
Compañía Distribuidora y Comercializadora de Energía S.A.	separate		286,638,433		960,495,650		1,247,134,083		(289,883,521)		(345,076,634)		(634,960,155)		852,871,077		(709,181,303)		143,689,773
Inversora Codensa S.A.	separate		917		77		994		(44)		-		(44)		-		(42)		(42)
Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A.	separate		217,226,659		284,575,649		501,802,308		(446,887,893)		(26,488,657)		(473,376,550)		528,653,054		(430,477,002)		98,176,052
Generalima, S.A.C.	separate		1,090,863		42,451,799		43,542,662		(10,035,149)		(6,827,226)		(16,862,375)		-		(1,100,914)		(1,100,914)
Endesa Cemsa, S.A.	separate		31,020,655		838,347		31,859,002		(26,525,440)		-		(26,525,440)		2,162,235		(1,841,541)		320,694
Inversora Dock Sud, S.A.	separate		31,153,011		67,474,319		98,627,330		(123,350,919)		(14,217,920)		(137,568,839)		59,138,823		(96,085,921)		(36,947,097)
Eléctrica Cabo Blanco, S.A.C.	consolidated		33,336,208		76,556,547		109,892,755		(11,319,405)		(48,505,916)		(59,825,321)		41,508,299		(38,031,891)		3,476,408
Inversiones Sudamerica Ltda.	consolidated		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		(7,218,564)		(7,218,564)

F-157

	12-31-2012
	Type of Financial           Statements	Current Assets        ThCh$		Non-current Assets       ThCh$		Total Assets      ThCh$		Current    Liabilities    ThCh$		Non-current     Liabilities     ThCh$		Total Liabilities    ThCh$		Revenues          ThCh$		Costs         ThCh$		Profit (Loss)    ThCh$
Chilectra S.A.	consolidated		161,687,282		1,141,771,229		1,303,458,511		(195,903,831)		(70,857,009)		(266,760,840)		984,738,419		(808,977,250)	175,761,169
Inmobiliaria Manso de Velasco Ltda.	consolidated		33,271,372		35,410,602		68,681,974		(4,487,954)		(473,280)		(4,961,234)		17,778,449		(5,170,257)	12,608,192
ICT Servicios Informáticos Ltda.	separate		4,302,210		327,443		4,629,653		(2,560,716)		(686,662)		(3,247,378)		6,205,706		(5,759,649)	446,057
Inversiones Distrilima S.A.	separate		14,081,778		45,150,539		59,232,317		(1,690)		-		(1,690)		13,767,559		-	13,767,559
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A.	separate		69,076,427		456,528,436		525,604,863		(121,208,497)		(202,239,406)		(323,447,903)		384,915,601		(344,989,210)	39,926,390
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.	separate		629,902,712		3,231,692,665		3,861,595,377		(658,103,026)		(791,579,065)		(1,449,682,091)		1,197,942,546		(1,006,425,543)	191,517,004
Endesa Eco S.A.	separate		96,858,959		69,458,787		166,317,746		(146,333,479)		(2,483,081)		(148,816,560)		8,847,825		(15,201,240)	(6,353,414)
Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.	separate		53,256,062		226,690,236		279,946,298		(67,804,287)		(44,094,780)		(111,899,067)		374,992,088		(117,294,279)	257,697,809
Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A.	separate		51,106,086		201,289,793		252,395,879		(106,039,552)		(21,730,290)		(127,769,842)		279,024,743		(223,910,404)	55,114,339
Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A.	separate		-		-		-		-		-		-		21,743,845		(10,100,977)	11,642,868
Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A.	separate		18,675,677		72,323,119		90,998,796		(10,274,500)		(4,390,710)		(14,665,210)		38,465,781		(53,695,291)	(15,229,510)
Inversiones Endesa Norte S.A.	separate		-		-		-		-		-		-		755,617		(543,185)	212,432
Soc. Concesionaria Túnel El Melón S.A.	separate		5,671,843		14,638,326		20,310,169		(2,924,404)		(9,068,755)		(11,993,159)		9,553,607		(1,237,412)	8,316,195
Endesa Argentina S.A.	separate		13,909,791		30,612,330		44,522,121		(456,855)		(4,479,930)		(4,936,785)		3,123,830		-	3,123,830
Endesa Costanera S.A.	separate		26,248,574		116,505,733		142,754,307		(195,463,171)		(10,460,347)		(205,923,518)		295,139,838		(343,984,979)	(48,845,141)
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	separate		15,500,507		148,052,530		163,553,037		(29,439,486)		(48,058,461)		(77,497,947)		49,195,031		(34,796,083)	14,398,948
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	separate		285,737,507		1,558,061,493		1,843,799,000		(179,589,763)		(757,392,282)		(936,982,045)		580,343,060		(379,082,030)	201,261,030
Generandes Perú S.A.	separate		190,469		202,696,963		202,887,432		(8,235)		-		(8,235)		18,720,477		-	18,720,477
Edegel S.A.A.	separate		73,195,465		686,321,901		759,517,366		(71,852,384)		(241,375,405)		(313,227,789)		250,100,131		(204,017,304)	46,082,826
Chinango S.A.C.	separate		6,997,326		107,354,750		114,352,076		(9,156,459)		(40,761,605)		(49,918,064)		30,172,752		(18,065,793)	12,106,959
Endesa Brasil S.A.	separate		286,665,587		904,628,344		1,191,293,931		(8,533,833)		(123,494)		(8,657,327)		186,136,751		-	186,136,751
Central Generadora Termoeléctrica Fortaleza S.A.	separate		64,532,319		134,844,880		199,377,199		(29,555,112)		(27,185,681)		(56,740,793)		139,185,606		(103,146,050)	36,039,556
Centrais Elétricas Cachoeira Dourada S.A.	separate		97,545,413		103,210,599		200,756,012		(14,682,311)		(2,283,384)		(16,965,695)		155,195,046		(47,917,978)	107,277,068
Compañía de Interconexión Energética S.A.	separate		26,050,134		246,005,939		272,056,073		(123,971,364)		(7,980,532)		(131,951,896)		67,804,297		(48,586,909)	19,217,388
Compañía de Transmisión del Mercosur S.A.	separate		16,674,370		3,631,634		20,306,004		(4,285,854)		(15,150,911)		(19,436,765)		2,469,289		(3,712,947)	(1,243,657)
Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	separate		199,077,008		675,770,287		874,847,295		(151,866,527)		(309,820,750)		(461,687,277)		808,410,729		(707,717,165)	100,693,564
EN-Brasil Comercio e Servicios S.A.	separate		3,113,907		173,146		3,287,053		(1,384,682)		-		(1,384,682)		5,800,382		(4,271,001)	1,529,381
Ampla Energía E Servicios S.A.	separate		196,988,364		1,037,583,848		1,234,572,212		(214,914,707)		(505,685,786)		(720,600,493)		1,074,237,206		(956,894,024)	117,343,182
Ampla Investimentos E Servicios S.A.	separate		1,901,905		84,277,314		86,179,219		(39,947,575)		-		(39,947,575)		7,785,179		-	7,785,179
Compañía Distribuidora y Comercializadora de Energía S.A.	separate		248,758,236		944,909,089		1,193,667,325		(279,593,196)		(311,739,451)		(591,332,647)		851,231,201		(708,926,803)	142,304,397
Inversora Codensa S.A.	separate		925		77		1,002		(11)		-		(11)		-		(141)	(141)
Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A.	separate		75,393,800		249,249,900		324,643,700		(376,427,291)		(17,990,925)		(394,418,216)		321,242,024		(402,048,323)	(80,806,299)

F-158

APPENDIX 1 ENERSIS GROUP COMPANIES:

This appendix is part of Note 2.4, “Subsidiaries.”

It presents the Group’s ownership interest in each company.

Taxpayer ID No.     (RUT)	Company (in alphabetical order)	Currency	Ownership Interest at 12/31/2013			Ownership Interest at 12/31/2012			Type of     Relationship	Country	Activity
			Direct	Indirect	Total	Direct	Indirect	Total
96,773,290-7	Aguas Santiago Poniente S.A.	Chilean peso	0.00%	78.88%	78.88%	0.00%	78.88%	78.88%	Subsidiary	Chile	Sanitation services
Foreign	Ampla Energía E Serviços S.A.	Brazilian real	13.68%	85.95%	99.63%	13.68%	78.25%	91.93%	Subsidiary	Brazil	Electric energy production, transportation, and distribution
Foreign	Ampla Investimentos E Serviços S.A.          (7)	Brazilian real	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	13.68%	78.25%	91.93%	Subsidiary	Brazil	Electric energy production, transmission, transformation, distribution, and sales
Foreign	Centrais Elétricas Cachoeira Dourada S.A.	Brazilian real	0.00%	99.61%	99.61%	0.00%	99.61%	99.61%	Subsidiary	Brazil	Generation and sale of electricity
Foreign	Central Dock Sud, S.A.	Argentine peso	0.00%	69.99%	69.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	Subsidiary	Argentina	Electric energy generation, transmission, and distribution
76,003,204-2	Central Eólica Canela S.A.	Chilean peso	0.00%	75.00%	75.00%	0.00%	75.00%	75.00%	Subsidiary	Chile	Promotion and development of renewable energy projects
Foreign	Central Generadora Termoeléctrica Fortaleza S.A.	Brazilian real	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Brazil	Development of a thermoelectric project
99,573,910-0	Chilectra Inversud S.A.	Chilean peso	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Chile	Portfolio company
96,800,570-7	Chilectra S.A.	Chilean peso	99.08%	0.01%	99.09%	99.08%	0.01%	99.09%	Subsidiary	Chile	Participation in companies of any nature
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peruvian nuevo sol	0.00%	80.00%	80.00%	0.00%	80.00%	80.00%	Subsidiary	Peru	Electric energy generation, sales, and distribution
Foreign	Compañía de Interconexión Energética S.A.	Brazilian real	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Brazil	Electric energy production, transportation, and distribution
Foreign	Compañía de Transmisión del Mercosur S.A.	Argentine peso	0.00%	99.99%	99.99%	0.00%	99.99%	99.99%	Subsidiary	Argentina	Electric energy production, transportation, and distribution
Foreign	Compañía Distribuidora y Comercializadora de energía S.A.	Colombian peso	12.47%	36.01%	48.48%	12.47%	9.35%	21.82%	Subsidiary	Colombia	Electric energy distribution and sales
96,783,220-0	Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. (1) (4)	Chilean peso	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	95.61%	95.61%	Subsidiary	Chile	Complete electric energy cycle
96,770,940-9	Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A.    (6)	Chilean peso	3.78%	96.21%	99.99%	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Chile	Complete electric energy cycle
Foreign	Cono Sur Participaciones, S.L.U.	Euro	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	Subsidiary	Spain	Portfolio company
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazilian real	0.00%	58.87%	58.87%	0.00%	58.87%	58.87%	Subsidiary	Brazil	Complete electric energy cycle
96,764,840-K	Constructora y Proyectos Los Maitenes S.A.	Chilean peso	0.00%	55.00%	55.00%	0.00%	55.00%	55.00%	Subsidiary	Chile	Construction and facilities
Foreign	Distrilec Inversora S.A.	Argentine peso	27.19%	24.31%	51.50%	27.19%	24.31%	51.50%	Subsidiary	Argentina	Portfolio company
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peruvian nuevo sol	0.00%	83.60%	83.60%	0.00%	83.60%	83.60%	Subsidiary	Peru	Electric energy generation, sales, and distribution
Foreign	Electrica Cabo Blanco, S.A.C.	Peruvian nuevo sol	80.00%	20.00%	100.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	Subsidiary	Peru	Portfolio company
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombian peso	0.00%	48.47%	48.47%	0.00%	26.87%	26.87%	Subsidiary	Colombia	Electric energy generation

F-159

Taxpayer ID No. (RUT)	Company    (in alphabetical order)	Currency	Ownership Interest at    12/31/2013			Ownership Interest at    12/31/2012			Type of Relationship	Country	Activity
			Direct	Indirect	Total	Direct	Indirect	Total
Foreign	Emgesa Panama S.A.	U.S.   dollar	0.00%	26.87%	26.87%	0.00%	26.87%	26.87%	Subsidiary	Panama	Purchase/sale of electric energy
Foreign	Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A	Peruvian   nuevo sol	35.02%	64.98%	100.00%	35.02%	30.15%	65.17%	Subsidiary	Peru	Electric energy distribution and sales
Foreign	Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A.	Argentine   peso	16.02%	83.43%	99.45%	16.02%	77.21%	93.23%	Subsidiary	Argentina	Electric energy distribution and sales
96,783,910-8	Empresa Eléctrica de Colina Ltda.	Chilean   peso	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Chile	Complete energy cycle and related supplies
Foreign	Empresa Eléctrica de Piura, S.A.	Peruvian   nuevo sol	0.00%	96.50%	96.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	Subsidiary	Peru
96,589,170-6	Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. (1)	Chilean   peso	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	Subsidiary	Chile	Complete electric energy cycle
96,504,980-0	Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.	Chilean   peso	0.00%	92.65%	92.65%	0.00%	92.65%	92.65%	Subsidiary	Chile	Complete electric energy cycle
91,081,000-6	Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A	Chilean   peso	59.98%	0.00%	59.98%	59.98%	0.00%	59.98%	Subsidiary	Chile	Complete electric energy cycle
Foreign	Endesa Argentina S.A.	Argentine   peso	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Argentina	Portfolio company
Foreign	Endesa Brasil S.A. (7)	Brazilian   real	50.09%	49.89%	99.98%	22.06%	49.46%	71.52%	Subsidiary	Brazil	Portfolio company
Foreign	Endesa Cemsa S.A.	Argentine   peso	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%	45.00%	45.00%	Subsidiary	Argentina	Wholesale purchase and sale of electric energy
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentine   peso	0.00%	69.76%	69.76%	0.00%	69.76%	69.76%	Subsidiary	Argentina	Electric energy generation and sales
96,827,970-K	Endesa Eco S.A. (3) (4) (6)	Chilean   peso	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Chile	Renewable energy projects
96,526,450-7	Endesa Inversiones Generales S.A. (2)	Chilean   peso	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	Subsidiary	Chile	Portfolio company
Foreign	Generalina, S.A.C.	Peruvian   nuevo sol	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	Subsidiary	Peru	Portfolio company
Foreign	Generandes Perú S.A.	Peruvian   nuevo sol	0.00%	61.00%	61.00%	0.00%	61.00%	61.00%	Subsidiary	Peru	Portfolio company
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.	Argentine   peso	0.00%	67.67%	67.67%	0.00%	67.67%	67.67%	Subsidiary	Argentina	Electric energy production and sales
Foreign	Hidroinvest S.A.	Argentine   peso	0.00%	96.09%	96.09%	0.00%	96.09%	96.09%	Subsidiary	Argentina	Portfolio company
In process	ICT Servicios Informáticos Ltda.	Chilean   peso	99.00%	1.00%	100.00%	99.00%	1.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Chile	Information and technology services
Foreign	Ingendesa do Brasil Ltda.	Brazilian   real	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Brazil	Project engineering consulting
79,913,810-7	Inmobiliaria Manso de Velasco Ltda.	Chilean   peso	99.99%	0.00%	99.99%	99.99%	0.00%	99.99%	Subsidiary	Chile	Construction and works
Foreign	Inversiones Distrilima S.A.	Peruvian   nuevo sol	34.99%	50.21%	85.20%	34.99%	15.38%	50.37%	Subsidiary	Peru	Portfolio company
Foreign	Inversora Dock Sud, S.A.	Argentine   peso	0.00%	57.14%	57.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	Subsidiary	Argentina	Portfolio company
96,887,060-2	Inversiones Endesa Norte S.A. (3)	Chilean   peso	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	Subsidiary	Chile	Investment in energy projects in northern Chile
In process	Inversiones Sudamerica Ltda. (5)	Chilean   peso	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	Subsidiary	Chile	Portfolio company

F-160

Taxpayer ID No.        (RUT)	Company (in alphabetical order)	Currency	Ownership Interest at 12/31/2013			Ownership Interest at 12/31/2012			Type of   Relationship	Country	Activity
			Direct	Indirect	Total	Direct	Indirect	Total
Foreign	Inversora Codensa S.A.S.	Colombian   peso	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Colombia	Investment in domestic public energy service activities
Foreign	Investluz S.A. (7)	Brazilian   real	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Brazil	Portfolio company
96,800,460-3	Luz Andes Ltda.	Chilean   peso	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Chile	Energy and fuel transportation, distribution, and sales
77,047,280-6	Sociedad Agrícola de Cameros Ltda.	Chilean   peso	0.00%	57.50%	57.50%	0.00%	57.50%	57.50%	Subsidiary	Chile	Financial investments
78,970,360-4	Sociedad Agrícola e Inmobiliaria Pastos Verdes Ltda.	Chilean   peso	0.00%	55.00%	55.00%	0.00%	55.00%	55.00%	Subsidiary	Chile	Financial investments
96,671,360-7	Sociedad Concesionaria Túnel El Melón S.A.	Chilean   peso	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Chile	Execution, construction, and operation of the El Melón tunnel
Foreign	Southern Cone Power Argentina S.A.	Argentine   peso	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Argentina	Portfolio company
Foreign	Transportadora de Energía S.A.	Argentine   peso	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Subsidiary	Argentina	Electric energy production, transportation, and distribution

(1) On May 1, 2012, Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. was merged with Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A.; the latter is the company which legally continues to exist.

(2) On May 1, 2012, Empresa de Ingeniería Ingendesa S.A. and Endesa Inversiones Generales S.A. were merged with Inversiones Endesa Norte S.A.; the latter is the company which legally continues to exist.

(3) On July 1, 2012, Inversiones Endesa Norte S.A. was merged with Endesa Eco S.A.; the latter is the company which legally continues to exist.

(4) On September 1, 2013, Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. was merged with Endesa Eco S.A.; the latter is the company which legally continues to exist.

(5) On October 1, 2013, Inversiones Sudamérica Ltda. was merged with Enersis S.A.; the latter is the company which legally continues to exist.

(6) On November 1, 2013, Endesa Eco S.A. was merged with Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A.; the latter is the company which legally continues to exist.

(7) On November 21, 2013, Investluz S.A and Ampla Investimentos E Serviços S.A. were merged with Endesa Brasil S.A.; the latter is the company which legally continues to exist.

F-161

APPENDIX 2 CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF CONSOLIDATION:

This appendix is part of Note 2.4.1 “Changes in the scope of consolidation.”

Incorporation into the scope of consolidation during the 2013 and 2012 fiscal years:

Company	% Ownership Interest				% Ownership Interest
	at December 31, 2013				at December 31, 2012
	Direct	Indirect	Total	Consolidation Method	Direct	Indirect	Total	Consolidation Method
Central Dock Sud, S.A.	0.00%	69.99%	69.99%	Full integration	-	-	-
Cono Sur Participaciones, S.L.U.	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	Full integration	-	-	-
Electrica Cabo Blanco, S.A.C.	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Full integration	-	-	-
Empresa Eléctrica de Piura, S.A.	0.00%	96.50%	96.50%	Full integration	-	-	-
Endesa Cemsa S.A.	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Full integration	-	-	-
Generalina, S.A.C.	0.00%	100.00%	100.00%	Full integration	-	-	-
Inversora Dock Sud, S.A.	0.00%	57.14%	57.14%	Full integration	-	-	-
Inversiones Sudamerica Ltda.	100.00%	0.00%	100.00%	Full integration	-	-	-

See Notes 2.4.1 and 25.1.1.

There were no companies excluded from the scope of consolidation during the 2013 and 2012 fiscal years.

F-162

APPENDIX 3 ASSOCIATED COMPANIES AND JOINT VENTURES:

This appendix is part of Note 3.h, “Investments accounted for using the equity method.”

Taxpayer ID No. (RUT)	Company ( in alphabetical order)	Functional Currency	Ownership Interest at 12/31/2013			Ownership Interest at 12/31/2012			Type of     Relationship	Country	Activity
			Direct	Indirect	Total	Direct	Indirect	Total
96,806,130-5	Electrogas S.A	U.S. dollar	00.00%	42.50%	42.50%	42.50%	0.00%	42.50%	Associate	Chile	Portfolio company
76,418,940-K	GNL Chile.S.A.	Chilean peso	0.00%	33.33%	33.33%	0.00%	33.33%	33.33%	Associate	Chile	Promote liquefied natural gas supply project
76,788,080-4	GNL Quintero S.A.	U.S. dollar	0.00%	20.00%	20.00%	0.00%	20.00%	20.00%	Associate	Chile	Development, design, and supply of liquid natural gas regasifying terminal
76,652,400-1	Centrales Hidroeléctricas De Aysén S.A.	Chilean peso	0.00%	51.00%	51.00%	0.00%	51.00%	51.00%	Joint Venture	Chile	Development and operation of a hydroelectric plant
Foreign	Distribuidora Eléctrica de Cundinamarca S.A.	Colombian peso	0.00%	49.00%	49.00%	0.00%	49.00%	49.00%	Joint Venture	Colombia	Electric energy distribution and sales
Foreign	Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A.	Colombian peso	0.00%	49.00%	49.00%	0.00%	49.00%	49.00%	Joint Venture	Colombia	Electric energy distribution and sales
76,014,570-K	Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda.	U.S. dollar	0.00%	50.00%	50.00%	0.00%	50.00%	50.00%	Joint Venture	Chile	Natural gas transportation
77,017,930-0	Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda.	Chilean peso	0.00%	50.00%	50.00%	0.00%	50.00%	50.00%	Joint Venture	Chile	Electric energy transportation and distribution

F-163

APPENDIX 4 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON FINANCIAL DEBT:

This appendix is part of Note 19, “Other financial liabilities.”

The following tables present the contractual undiscounted cash flows by type of financial debt:

a ) Bank borrowings

i. Summary of bank loans by currency and maturity

Country	Currency	Nominal     Rate	Current			Non-current				Current			Non-current				Current			Non-current
			Maturity			Maturity			Total non-   current at   12/31/2013	Maturity			Maturity			Total non-   current at   12/31/2012	Maturity			Maturity			Total Non-   current at   01/01/2012
			One to   three   months   ThCh$	Three to   twelve   months   ThCh$	Total   current at   12/31/2013	One to   three   years   ThCh$	Three to   five years   ThCh$	More   than five   years   ThCh$		One to   three   months   ThCh$	Three to   twelve   months   ThCh$	Total   current at   12/31/2012	One to   three years   ThCh$	Three to   five years   ThCh$	More   than five   years   ThCh$		One to   three   months   ThCh$	Three to   twelve   months   ThCh$	Total   current at   1/1//2012	One to   three years   ThCh$	Three to   five years   ThCh$	More   than five   years   ThCh$
					ThCh$				ThCh$			ThCh$				ThCh$			ThCh$				ThCh$
Chile	US$	1.78%	842,850	106,843,174	107,686,024	892,825	-	-	892,825	818,386	2,531,449	3,349,835	98,982,459	-	-	98,982,459	906,389	3,359,497	4,265,886	109,631,899	876,746	-	110,508,645
Chile	Ch$	5.50%	119	-	119	-	-	-	-	371	-	371	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Peru	US$	3.46%	3,055,656	4,146,020	7,201,676	25,010,727	28,623,011	-	53,633,738	2,214,895	1,865,048	4,079,943	14,173,501	27,830,814	12,109,598	54,113,913	2,810,297	10,519,166	13,329,463	7,864,024	25,087,748	26,158,087	59,109,859
Peru	S/.	5.41%	378,238	1,134,709	1,512,947	3,025,893	24,478,180	-	27,504,073	336,866	1,010,593	1,347,459	2,694,912	9,719,488	15,531,401	27,945,801	431,794	2,987,507	3,419,301	3,362,985	-	38,373,491	41,736,476
Argentina	US$	8.87%	3,542,419	8,408,627	11,951,046	1,641,372	-	-	1,641,372	6,845,061	5,093,612	11,938,673	7,836,715	-	-	7,836,715	2,662,019	9,436,481	12,098,500	17,142,594	1,612,063	-	18,754,657
Argentina	Ar$	22.90%	16,786,045	12,195,441	28,981,486	18,741,635	-	-	18,741,635	29,510,090	30,335,750	59,845,840	11,637,995	-	-	11,637,995	37,689,501	28,405,542	66,095,043	47,915,942	2,458,440	-	50,374,382
Colombia	CP	8.27%	1,431,306	4,293,917	5,725,223	16,996,306	31,725,477	65,954,840	114,676,623	1,900,127	5,700,379	7,600,506	25,790,155	33,339,101	60,191,993	119,321,249	1,338,154	82,134,906	83,473,060	-	-	-	-
Brazil	US$	7.72%	425,017	8,439,726	8,864,743	13,964,589	6,077,352	1,171,932	21,213,873	469,815	7,492,580	7,962,395	16,343,599	8,949,758	2,144,472	27,437,829	644,936	12,599,186	13,244,122	17,532,685	17,877,446	6,352,599	41,762,730
Brazil	R$	8.61%	700,813	2,102,437	2,803,250	5,606,499	23,959,095	10,577,923	40,143,517	5,278,565	24,723,805	30,002,370	-	-	-	-	30,524,862	175,096,068	205,620,930	142,254,517	90,580,272	8,209,057	241,043,846
			27,162,463	147,564,051	174,726,514	85,879,846	114,863,115	77,704,695	278,447,656	47,374,176	78,753,216	126,127,392	177,459,336	79,839,161	89,977,464	347,275,961	77,007,952	324,538,353	401,546,305	345,704,646	138,492,715	79,093,234	563,290,595

F-164

ii. Identification of bank borrowings by company

Taxpayer ID No.   (RUT)	Company	Country	Financial Institution	Currency	Effective   Interest   Rate	Nominal   Interest   Rate	December 31, 2013
							Current						Non-current
							Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Unibanco	R$	10.27%	10.29%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Brasdesco	R$	9.75%	5.65%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Banco do Brasil	R$	9.61%	10.12%		700,813		2,102,437		2,803,250		5,606,499		23,959,095		10,577,923		40,143,517
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Banco HSBC	R$	9.93%	9.77%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Banco Itaú	R$	10.12%	10.20%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Electrobras	R$	6.50%	6.50%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Bndes	R$	9.06%	9.06%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Banco Alfa	R$	6.97%	7.25%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	CGTF Fortaleza	Brazil	IFC - A	US$	7.97%	8.04%		251,103		3,518,132		3,769,235		7,478,001		3,705,738		-		11,183,739
Foreign	CGTF Fortaleza	Brazil	IFC - B	US$	2.74%	2.73%		62,832		4,588,348		4,651,180		4,844,441		-		-		4,844,441
Foreign	CGTF Fortaleza	Brazil	IFC - C	US$	12.08%	12.31%		111,082		333,246		444,328		1,642,147		2,371,614		1,171,932		5,185,693
Foreign	Compañía de Interconexión Energética S.A.	Brazil	Santander	R$	11.61%	11.80%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
96,800,570-7	Chilectra S.A.	Chile	Bank credit lines	Ch$	5.91%	5.91%		104		-		104		-		-		-		-
94,271,000-3	Enersis S.A.	Chile	Banco Santander Chile	Ch$	5.00%	5.00%		4		-		4		-		-		-		-
79,913,810-7	Inmobiliaria Manso de Velasco Ltda.	Chile	Banco Santander Chile	Ch$	6.00%	6.00%		4		-		4		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Banco Europeo de Investimentos	US$	5.49%	5.49%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Eletrobras	R$	6.46%	6.46%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Banco do Brasil	R$	15.61%	15.61%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Bndes	R$	9.52%	9.52%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Banco do Nordeste	R$	7.78%	7.78%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Banco Europeo de Investimentos	US$	5.49%	5.49%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Banco de Crédito	S/.	5.43%	5.32%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Banco de Crédito	S/.	5.43%	5.32%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Banco de Interbank	S/.	6.90%	6.73%		89,516		268,546		358,062		716,124		6,107,626		-		6,823,750
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Banco Continental	S/.	5.43%	5.32%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Banco de Crédito	S/.	5.43%	5.32%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Banco de Crédito	S/.	5.43%	5.32%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Banco de Crédito	S/.	5.43%	5.32%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Banco de Crédito	S/.	5.43%	5.32%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Banco de Crédito	S/.	5.43%	5.32%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Banco Continental	S/.	5.10%	5.01%		45,411		136,232		181,643		363,286		3,077,744		-		3,441,030
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Banco Continental	S/.	5.10%	5.01%		75,764		227,291		303,055		606,110		5,130,021		-		5,736,131
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Banco Continental	S/.	5.10%	5.01%		73,538		220,614		294,152		588,305		4,929,381		-		5,517,686
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Banco Continental	S/.	5.10%	5.01%		94,009		282,026		376,035		752,068		5,233,408		-		5,985,476
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Banco de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires	Ar$	22.63%	28.38%		738,135		2,147,173		2,885,308		3,417,147		-		-		3,417,147
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Banco Provincia de Buenos Aires	Ar$	22.63%	25.03%		31,972		327,033		359,005		504,864		-		-		504,864
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Standard Bank	Ar$	22.63%	29.11%		300,671		875,884		1,176,555		342,441		-		-		342,441
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	BBVA	Ar$	19.55%	18.00%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Citibank	Ar$	24.06%	21.75%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Banco Itaú	Ar$	22.63%	30.29%		320,316		884,324		1,204,640		1,000,308		-		-		1,000,308
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Banco Galicia	Ar$	22.63%	21.00%		68,637		-		68,637		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Banco Macro	Ar$	22.63%	29.56%		258,319		886,628		1,144,947		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Citibank	Ar$	24.36%	22.00%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Banco Santander Río	US$	6.24%	6.24%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Banco Santander Río	Ar$	22.63%	25.56%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Banco Santander Río	Ar$	22.63%	27.23%		728,237		2,549,992		3,278,229		1,725,706		-		-		1,725,706
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Banco Santander Río	Ar$	21.28%	19.75%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Banco Santander Río	Ar$	23.10%	21.00%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Banco Frances	Ar$	22.63%	20.30%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Comafi	Ar$	22.63%	23.00%		24,455		-		24,455		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Banco Supervielle	Ar$	22.63%	23.00%		39,237		37,009		76,246		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Banco Continental	S/.	3.85%	3.80%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Banco Scotiabank	US$	4.02%	3.96%		316,892		941,120		1,258,012		2,439,568		14,463,816		-		16,903,384
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Bank Of Nova Scotia	US$	3.05%	3.01%		366,751		1,085,588		1,452,339		2,787,364		1,335,025		-		4,122,389
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Banco Scotiabank	US$	0.76%	0.78%		2,103,523		-		2,103,523		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edegel	Peru	Banco de Crédito	US$	1.65%	1.65%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edegel	Peru	Banco Continental	US$	3.42%	3.38%		268,490		2,119,312		2,387,802		19,783,795		12,824,170		-		32,607,965
Foreign	Edegel	Peru	Banco Continental	US$	3.46%	3.41%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edegel	Peru	Banco Scotiabank	US$	3.45%	3.41%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edegel	Peru	Banco Continental	US$	3.00%	3.00%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa	Colombia	Bancolombia	CP	8.44%	8.27%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa	Colombia	Bancolombia	CP	8.44%	8.27%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa	Colombia	BBVA Colombia	CP	6.89%	6.78%		1,051,003		3,153,008		4,204,011		12,499,230		23,371,517		48,619,434		84,490,181
Foreign	Emgesa	Colombia	AV VILLAS	CP	8.44%	8.27%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa	Colombia	Banco Santander	CP	8.15%	7.91%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa	Colombia	Banco Davivienda	CP	8.15%	7.91%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa	Colombia	Banco Corpbanca	CP	7.01%	6.90%		380,303		1,140,909		1,521,212		4,497,076		8,353,960		17,335,406		30,186,442
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Banco Supervielle	Ar$	31.89%	28.00%		1,028,903		-		1,028,903		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Banco Santander Río	Ar$	34.49%	30.00%		656,552		-		656,552		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Banco Nación Argentina	Ar$	20.57%	18.85%		533,563		-		533,563		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Citibank	Ar$	39.84%	34.00%		3,391,799		-		3,391,799		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Banco Ciudad	Ar$	25.59%	23.00%		98,467		-		98,467		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Standard Bank	Ar$	30.61%	27.00%		1,150,992		-		1,150,992		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Banco Itau	Ar$	35.15%	30.50%		1,071,559		-		1,071,559		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Banco Galicia	Ar$	32.54%	28.50%		2,514,705		-		2,514,705		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Banco Provincia de Buenos Aires	Ar$	20.20%	18.09%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Credit Suisse International	US$	13.67%	13.25%		113,672		3,229,006		3,342,678		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Argentina S.A.	Argentina	Citibank	Ar$	21.50%	21.50%		809,763		-		809,763		-		-		-		-
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	B.N.P. Paribas	US$	1.72%	1.12%		28,293		921,118		949,411		892,825		-		-		892,825
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Export Development Corpotation Loan	US$	1.57%	1.40%		378,291		378,290		756,581		-		-		-		-
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A.NY	US$	1.72%	1.12%		436,266		105,543,766		105,980,032		-		-		-		-
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	Banco Santander Chile (Credit Line)	Ch$	6.00%	6.00%		7		-		7		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Deutsche Bank	US$	8.24%	7.99%		1,712,808		2,587,169		4,299,977		820,490		-		-		820,490
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Standard Bank	US$	8.24%	7.99%		857,292		1,295,083		2,152,375		410,356		-		-		410,356
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Itau	US$	8.24%	7.99%		858,647		1,297,369		2,156,016		410,526		-		-		410,526
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Itau	Ar$	33.70%	29.25%		163,618		-		163,618		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Standard Bank - Syndicated I	Ar$	25.42%	23.31%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Santander - Syndicated I	Ar$	25.42%	23.31%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Hipotecario - Syndicated I	Ar$	26.68%	23.89%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Galicia - Syndicated I	Ar$	25.42%	23.31%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Itau - Syndicated II	Ar$	26.62%	23.84%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Standard Bank - Syndicated II	Ar$	26.62%	23.84%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Santander - Syndicated II	Ar$	26.62%	23.84%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Hipotecario - Syndicated II	Ar$	26.96%	24.11%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Galicia - Syndicated II	Ar$	26.62%	23.84%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Ciudad -Syndicated II	Ar$	26.62%	23.84%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Galicia - Syndicated III	Ar$	26.44%	23.69%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Itau - Syndicated III	Ar$	26.44%	23.69%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Standard Bank - Syndicated III	Ar$	26.44%	23.69%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Santander - Syndicated III	Ar$	26.44%	23.69%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Macro	Ar$	30.42%	27.75%		1,511,204		-		1,511,204		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Macro I	Ar$	23.14%	21.00%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Standard Bank	Ar$	25.59%	23.00%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Santander Río	Ar$	25.59%	23.00%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Citibank	Ar$	19.84%	BPC + 5.10%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	BBVA	Ar$	19.84%	BPC + 5.10%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Industrial de Azul	Ar$	19.84%	BPC + 5.10%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Santander - Syndicated IV	Ar$	33.84%	30.22%		316,184		1,054,829		1,371,013		2,761,603		-		-		2,761,603
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Itau - Syndicated IV	Ar$	33.84%	30.22%		282,011		940,860		1,222,871		2,463,429		-		-		2,463,429
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Galicia - Syndicated IV	Ar$	33.84%	30.22%		270,612		902,848		1,173,460		2,364,010		-		-		2,364,010
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Hipotecario - Syndicated IV	Ar$	33.84%	30.22%		89,772		299,691		389,463		785,764		-		-		785,764
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Banco Ciudad -Syndicated IV	Ar$	33.84%	30.22%		36,008		120,377		156,385		316,594		-		-		316,594
Foreign	Hidroeléctrica El Chocón	Argentina	Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Argentina	Ar$	33.84%	30.22%		350,354		1,168,793		1,519,147		3,059,769		-		-		3,059,769
			Total					27.162.463		147.564.051		174.726.514		85,879,846		114,863,115		77,704,695		278,447,656

December 31, 2012															January 1, 2012
Current						Non-current									Current						Non-current
Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years			More than five years		Total Non- current		Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		45,870		1,542,373		1,588,243		-		-		-		-
	4,723,977		-		4,723,977		-		-			-		-		5,982,354		13,453,719		19,436,073		-		-		-		-
	554,588		24,723,805		25,278,393		-		-			-		-		875,019		2,942,372		3,817,391		30,333,452		-		-		30.333.452
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		632,464		22,045,700		22,678,164		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		57,479		1,964,473		2,021,952		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		339,935		1,111,948		1,451,883		2,916,206		5.539.073		725.103		9.180.382
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		6,488,408		16,888,622		23,377,030		33,192,137		52.961.281		3.133.364		89.286.782
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		1,779,341		12,975,006		14,754,347		-		-		-		-
	276,653		3,174,804		3,451,457		6,851,156		6,773,346			-		13,624,502		344,277		3,510,015		3,854,292		7,427,750		7.100.739		4.604.499		19.132.988
	91,826		4,013,768		4,105,594		8,681,755		-			-		8,681,755		114,099		4,162,847		4,276,946		8,990,990		4.835.251		-		13.826.241
	101,336		304,008		405,344		810,688		2,176,412			2,144,472		5,131,572		108,598		365,176		473,774		875,946		5.584.166		-		6.460.112
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		1,801,366		59,020,877		60,822,243		-		-		-		-
	46		-		46		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	53		-		53		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		19,073		173,334		192,407		237,999		357.290		1.748.100		2.343.389
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		1,721,402		4,747,664		6,469,066		8,943,102		16.832.769		4.350.590		30.126.461
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		1,310,254		4,235,607		5,545,861		5,443,423		-		-		5.443.423
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		9,231,834		30,273,652		39,505,486		56,108,514		15.247.149		-		71.355.663
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		259,136		3,894,055		4,153,191		5,317,683		-		-		5.317.683
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		58,889		4,387,814		4,446,703		-		-		-		-
	41,569		124,706		166,275		332,548		1,050,422			2,117,918		3,500,888		37,891		127,413		165,304		305,625		-		3.584.598		3.890.223
	58,199		174,596		232,795		465,590		1,470,611			2,965,089		4,901,290		60,638		203,903		264,541		489,101		-		5.157.627		5.646.728
	32,026		96,077		128,103		256,207		2,016,376			-		2,272,583		32,758		110,153		142,911		264,223		-		2.430.861		2.695.084
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		99,201		333,576		432,777		800,145		-		9.525.160		10.325.305
	41,569		124,706		166,275		332,548		1,050,422			2,117,918		3,500,888		37,891		127,413		165,304		305,625		-		3.584.598		3.890.223
	41,569		124,706		166,275		332,548		1,050,422			2,117,918		3,500,888		37,891		127,413		165,304		305,625		-		3.584.598		3.890.223
	36,026		108,077		144,103		288,205		910,362			1,835,528		3,034,095		32,360		108,816		141,176		261,016		-		3.097.880		3.358.896
	16,627		49,882		66,509		133,019		420,169			847,167		1,400,355		15,156		50,965		66,121		122,250		-		1.433.839		1.556.089
	69,281		207,843		277,124		554,247		1,750,704			3,529,863		5,834,814		63,151		212,355		275,506		509,375		-		5.974.330		6.483.705
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	314,754		7,549,210		7,863,964		-		-			-		-		6,354,203		1,169,601		7,523,804		9,498,494		-		-		9.498.494
	37,725		1,074,140		1,111,865		-		-			-		-		124,577		158,143		282,720		1,364,912		-		-		1.364.912
	769,536		2,086,114		2,855,650		621,207		-			-		621,207		213,681		718,530		932,211		4,195,131		-		-		4.195.131
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		128,257		2,499,512		2,627,769		-		-		-		-
	57,771		1,428,116		1,485,887		-		-			-		-		673,842		228,279		902,121		3,245,052		-		-		3.245.052
	119,563		2,712,832		2,832,395		-		-			-		-		288,456		4,819,512		5,107,968		2,454,313		-		-		2.454.313
	592,597		195,649		788,246		-		-			-		-		2,120,536		1,891,956		4,012,492		-		-		-		-
	2,014,971		-		2,014,971		-		-			-		-		151,298		508,762		660,060		3,474,143		-		-		3.474.143
	877,758		578,433		1,456,191		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	199,159		-		199,159		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	4,441,078		-		4,441,078		-		-			-		-		614,888		1,088,442		1,703,330		4,708,036		-		-		4.708.036
	48,076		689,891		737,967		411,852		-			-		411,852		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	97,084		1,381,833		1,478,917		824,138		-			-		824,138		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	121,354		1,727,291		1,848,645		1,030,173		-			-		1,030,173		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	491,236		-		491,236		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	238,213		-		238,213		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	79,285		-		79,285		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		14,597		1,585,500		1,600,097		-		-		-		-
	161,573		923,528		1,085,101		2,391,649		2,288,243			12,109,598		16,789,490		166,062		558,407		724,469		2,423,556		17.774.668		-		20.198.224
	37,359		112,077		149,436		2,621,204		2,471,768			-		5,092,972		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	1,739,482		-		1,739,482		-		-			-		-		1,949,762		5,760,203		7,709,965		1,880,534		-		-		1.880.534
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		405,477		1,378,129		1,783,606		-		-		-		-
	276,481		829,443		1,105,924		9,160,648		23,070,803			-		32,231,451		280,841		944,367		1,225,208		3,559,934		7.313.080		26.158.087		37.031.101
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		8,155		1,878,060		1,886,215		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		260		-		260		-		-		-		-
	428,684		1,286,051		1,714,735		5,805,307		7,495,253	��		13,520,587		26,821,147		326,504		20,008,140		20,334,644		-		-		-		-
	131,424		394,271		525,695		1,838,073		2,414,481			4,407,478		8,660,032		99,148		6,208,686		6,307,834		-		-		-		-
	1,158,673		3,476,018		4,634,691		15,690,942		20,258,627			36,544,265		72,493,834		361,976		22,181,880		22,543,856		-		-		-		-
	181,346		544,039		725,385		2,455,833		3,170,740			5,719,663		11,346,236		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		412,115		25,254,372		25,666,487		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		138,411		8,481,828		8,620,239		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	1,483,661		-		1,483,661		-		-			-		-		123,454		-		123,454		-		-		-		-
	879,133		-		879,133		-		-			-		-		10,746,076		1,949,571		12,695,647		-		-		-		-
	946,327		1,855,665		2,801,992		411,921		-			-		411,921		1,382,931		1,533,096		2,916,027		-		-		-		-
	4,349,740		-		4,349,740		-		-			-		-		1,844,142		-		1,844,142		-		-		-		-
	395,870		-		395,870		-		-			-		-		4,670,705		-		4,670,705		-		-		-		-
	1,388,486		-		1,388,486		-		-			-		-		832,611		-		832,611		-		-		-		-
	2,459,388		-		2,459,388		-		-			-		-		3,503,302		-		3,503,302		-		-		-		-
	2,031,944		-		2,031,944		-		-			-		-		1,105,942		-		1,105,942		-		-		-		-
	96,871		122,911		219,782		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	4,883,837		-		4,883,837		-		-			-		-		166,419		3,156,573		3,322,992		2,652,744		-		-		2.652.744
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	31,301		859,843		891,144		1,657,085		-			-		1,657,085		53,521		1,002,756		1,056,277		1,915,379		876.746		-		2.792.125
	347,952		354,206		702,158		689,651		-			-		689,651		379,501		764,980		1,144,481		1,132,904		-		-		1.132.904
	439,133		1,317,400		1,756,533		96,635,723		-			-		96,635,723		473,367		1,591,761		2,065,128		106,583,616		-		-		106.583.616
	272		-		272		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	881,121		2,547,013		3,428,134		3,918,502		-			-		3,918,502		518,208		1,530,246		2,048,454		3,576,867		402.643		-		3.979.510
	440,417		1,273,172		1,713,589		1,959,017		-			-		1,959,017		1,611,491		4,749,662		6,361,153		10,912,983		1.209.420		-		12.122.403
	440,527		1,273,427		1,713,954		1,959,196		-			-		1,959,196		1,791,907		-		1,791,907		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		64,001		1,336,177		1,400,178		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		80,629		1,707,695		1,788,324		-		-		-		-
	354,694		340,398		695,092		-		-			-		-		55,506		1,125,918		1,181,424		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		26,301		535,888		562,189		-		-		-		-
	239,076		488,681		727,757		230,121		-			-		230,121		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	527,542		1,078,428		1,605,970		507,222		-			-		507,222		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	383,587		784,144		1,167,731		368,840		-			-		368,840		329,514		1,108,036		1,437,550		6,245,072		1.229.220		-		7.474.292
	190,602		389,550		580,152		183,696		-			-		183,696		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	190,906		390,193		581,099		183,881		-			-		183,881		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	152,374		311,411		463,785		146,892		-			-		146,892		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	614,638		779,040		1,393,678		1,679,513		-			-		1,679,513		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	614,638		779,040		1,393,678		1,679,513		-			-		1,679,513		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	614,638		779,040		1,393,678		1,679,513		-			-		1,679,513		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	614,638		779,040		1,393,678		1,679,513		-			-		1,679,513		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	87,619		2,034,700		2,122,319		-		-			-		-		233,981		2,275,667		2,509,648		2,994,506		-		-		2.994.506
	295,652		-		295,652		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	198,116		-		198,116		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	98,949		-		98,949		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		112,503		1,115,167		1,227,670		1,471,923		-		-		1.471.923
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		152,645		1,527,554		1,680,199		2,019,288		-		-		2.019.288
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		329,514		1,108,036		1,437,550		6,245,072		1.229.220		-		7.474.292
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-			-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	47,374,176		78,753,216		126,127,392		177,459,336		79,839,161			89,977,464		347,275,961		77,007,952		324,538,353		401,546,305		345,704,646		138,492,715		79,093,234		563,290,595

F-165

b ) Secured and unsecured liabilities

i. Summary of secured and unsecured liabilities by currency and maturity

Country	Currency	Nominal Rate			Current						Non-current								Current						Non-current								Current						Non-current
					Maturity				Total current at 12/31/2013 ThCh$		Maturity						Total non- current at 12/31/2013		Maturity				Total current at 12/31/2012 ThCh$		Maturity						Total non- current at 12/31/2012		Maturity				Total current at 1/1//2012 ThCh$		Maturity						Total non- current at 01/01/2012
					One to three months ThCh$		Three to twelve months ThCh$				One to three years ThCh$		Three to five years ThCh$		More than five years ThCh$				One to three months ThCh$		Three to twelve months ThCh$				One to three years ThCh$		Three to five years ThCh$		More than five years ThCh$				One to three months ThCh$		Three to twelve months ThCh$				One to three years ThCh$		Three to five years ZThCh$		More than five years ThCh$
																	ThCh$														ThCh$														ThCh$
Chile	US$		7.62	%		193,391,423		24,826,863		218,218,286		289,958,193		27,073,140		400,223,952		717,255,285		14,737,200		230,223,447		244,960,647		321,100,837		152,918,883		397,654,469		871,674,189		22,439,241		48,971,036		71,410,277		481,039,815		346,571,275		425,876,193	1,253,487,283
Chile	U.F.		5.57	%		6,035,415		25,473,179		31,508,594		61,600,091		59,682,775		410,441,438		531,724,304		6,471,264		26,447,107		32,918,371		64,353,555		62,344,872		439,118,433		565,816,860		41,003,385		39,199,072		80,202,457		89,539,138		263,688,193		527,887,200	881,114,531
Peru	US$		6.89	%		649,265		7,018,782		7,668,047		17,490,149		7,500,859		18,288,999		43,280,007		628,048		1,884,143		2,512,191		12,047,614		12,454,106		22,585,830		47,087,550		853,625		2,238,831		3,092,456		16,267,919		28,913,608		19,449,710	64,631,237
Peru	S/.		5.86	%		13,199,528		41,657,758		54,857,286		57,861,172		22,457,493		135,395,067		215,713,732		23,539,322		33,223,851		56,763,173		82,309,019		33,206,836		70,650,808		186,166,663		31,909,724		18,212,792		50,122,516		92,722,951		73,395,355		17,029,264	183,147,570
Argentina	Ar$		0.00	%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		116,551		4,100,169		4,216,720		-		-		-	-
Colombia	CP		7.54	%		102,194,394		81,201,594		183,395,988		245,026,408		396,887,510		795,923,731		1,437,837,649		41,109,039		101,282,166		142,391,205		299,961,187		293,630,963		646,033,188		1,239,625,338		17,854,990		68,624,369		86,479,359		299,425,050		335,136,989		589,777,719	1,224,339,758
Brazil	R$		10.70	%		7,808,433		23,425,299		31,233,732		158,060,332		166,465,710		25,912,300		350,438,342		9,870,157		55,941,012		65,811,169		132,005,212		195,057,347		97,529,513		424,592,072		11,815,750		134,615,237		146,430,987		123,922,410		200,558,653		90,131,132	414,612,195
						323,278,458		203,603,475		526,881,933		829,996,345		680,067,487		1,786,185,487		3,296,249,319		96,355,030		449,001,726		545,356,756		911,777,424		749,613,007		1,673,572,241		3,334,962,672		125,993,266		315,961,506		441,954,772		1,102,917,283		1,248,264,073		1,670,151,218	4,021,332,574

F-166

ii. Secured and unsecured liabilities by company

Taxpayer ID No. (RUT)	Company	Country	Financial Institution	Country	Currency	Effective Interest Rate	Nominal Interest Rate	December 31, 2013
								Current							Non-current
								Less than 90 days		More than 90 days			Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	BONDS	Brazil	R$	9.56%	9.56%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Bonds, 1st Series	Brazil	R$	9.14%	9.21%		599,930		1,799,791			2,399,721		28,647,432		-		-		28,647,432
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Bonds, 2nd Series	Brazil	R$	15.22%	15.91%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Bonds, 2nd Series	Brazil	R$	13.84%	14.12%		1,626,374		4,879,121			6,505,495		27,591,601		35,666,723		-		63,258,324
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Bonds, 1st Series	Brazil	R$	8.96%	9.01%		502,290		1,506,870			2,009,160		14,733,001		11,719,260		-		26,452,261
Foreign	Ampla	Brazil	Bonds, 2nd Series	Brazil	R$	11.88%	12.11%		2,178,696		6,536,087			8,714,783		17,429,566		60,539,380		25,912,300		103,881,246
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	B8	Colombia	CP	8.75%	8.48%		69,571,278		-			69,571,278		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	B102	Colombia	CP	7.69%	7.48%		1,927,748		5,783,244			7,710,992		15,421,984		108,708,280		-		124,130,264
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	B502	Colombia	CP	6.81%	6.93%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	B503	Colombia	CP	6.85%	6.68%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	B503	Colombia	CP	8.40%	8.14%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	B103	Colombia	CP	7.95%	7.72%		401,391		1,204,173			1,605,564		3,211,129		25,030,906		-		28,242,035
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	B304	Colombia	CP	5.83%	5.71%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	B604	Colombia	CP	6.28%	6.14%		570,162		1,710,487			2,280,649		42,209,103		-		-		42,209,103
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	B5-13 Bonds	Colombia	CP	5.75%	5.63%		665,514		1,996,541			2,662,055		5,324,109		54,649,529		-		59,973,638
Foreign	Codensa	Colombia	B12-13 Bonds	Colombia	CP	6.64%	6.49%		815,445		2,446,336			3,261,781		6,523,562		6,523,562		75,293,598		88,340,722
Foreign	Coelce	Brazil	Itaú 2	Brazil	R$	14.89%	15.08%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Coelce	Brazil	Itaú 1	Brazil	R$	8.90%	8.96%		518,894		1,556,683			2,075,577		26,098,736		-		-		26,098,736
Foreign	Coelce	Brazil	Itaú 2	Brazil	R$	12.69%	12.94%		2,382,249		7,146,747			9,528,996		43,559,996		58,540,347		-		102,100,343
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	S/.	5.44%	5.37%		67,338		4,927,820			4,995,158		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	S/.	6.50%	6.40%		80,216		4,975,353			5,055,569		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Integra	Peru	S/.	6.50%	6.40%		159,793		9,933,071			10,092,864		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Retirement Insurance Fund for Non-commissioned Officers and Specialists - Fosersoe	Peru	S/.	8.75%	8.57%		123,552		370,657			494,209		5,887,936		-		-		5,887,936
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Integra	Peru	S/.	8.16%	8.00%		69,116		207,348			276,464		3,684,001		-		-		3,684,001
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Horizonte	Peru	S/.	7.22%	7.09%		51,004		153,011			204,015		3,160,439		-		-		3,160,439
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Integra	Peru	S/.	8.00%	7.85%		102,391		307,173			409,564		5,592,178		-		-		5,592,178
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	FCR - Macrofondo	Peru	S/.	6.66%	6.55%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Integra	Peru	S/.	5.91%	5.82%		55,631		166,892			222,523		3,834,729		-		-		3,834,729
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Prima	Peru	S/.	6.94%	6.82%		130,531		391,592			522,123		7,869,191		-		-		7,869,191
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Prima	Peru	S/.	6.81%	6.70%		80,145		4,780,838			4,860,983		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Prima	Peru	S/.	7.13%	7.00%		83,817		251,452			335,269		5,203,598		-		-		5,203,598
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Profuturo	Peru	S/.	7.72%	7.58%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Profuturo	Peru	S/.	8.06%	7.91%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Horizonte	Peru	S/.	6.56%	6.46%		91,012		5,602,792			5,693,804		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	S/.	7.06%	6.94%		99,752		299,257			399,009		798,018		5,773,835		-		6,571,853
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Prima	Peru	S/.	6.63%	6.52%		62,441		187,322			249,763		3,843,809		-		-		3,843,809
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Prima	Peru	S/.	7.44%	7.30%		105,041		315,122			420,163		840,325		840,325		6,341,102		8,021,752
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	S/.	6.50%	6.40%		61,265		183,796			245,061		490,123		3,964,772		-		4,454,895
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	FCR - Macrofondo	Peru	S/.	7.03%	6.91%		66,260		198,780			265,040		530,079		530,079		3,782,641		4,842,799
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Interseguro Cia de Seguros	Peru	S/.	6.28%	6.19%		118,575		355,725			474,300		948,600		948,600		9,576,409		11,473,609
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	S/.	6.06%	5.97%		143,077		429,232			572,309		1,144,619		1,144,619		13,049,859		15,339,097
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Essalud Health Insurance	Peru	S/.	7.84%	7.70%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Prima	Peru	S/.	6.84%	6.73%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Mapfre Perú Cia de Seguros	Peru	S/.	6.28%	6.19%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Profuturo	Peru	S/.	8.31%	8.15%		94,494		283,481			377,975		4,778,264		-		-		4,778,264
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Profuturo	Peru	S/.	7.91%	7.76%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Profuturo	Peru	S/.	7.56%	7.42%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	FCR - Macrofondo	Peru	S/.	5.56%	5.49%		131,326		393,977			525,303		1,050,605		1,050,605		11,852,798		13,954,008
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	S/.	5.00%	4.94%		94,484		283,452			377,936		755,871		755,871		10,513,101		12,024,843
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Profuturo	Peru	S/.	5.77%	5.69%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Horizonte	Peru	S/.	6.06%	5.97%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Profuturo	Peru	S/.	6.67%	6.56%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	AFP Profuturo	Peru	S/.	7.97%	7.81%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	S/.	5.00%	4.94%		121,972		365,917			487,889		975,778		975,778		12,864,045		14,815,601
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	S/.	6.75%	6.64%		160,240		480,721			640,961		1,281,922		1,281,922		10,469,655		13,033,499
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	S/.	7.28%	7.15%		122,685		368,055			490,740		981,481		981,481		12,974,185		14,937,147
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	S/.	6.50%	6.40%		160,947		482,841			643,788		1,287,576		1,287,576		10,635,313		13,210,465
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Rimac Internacional Cia de Seguros	Peru	S/.	7.38%	7.24%		217,255		651,766			869,021		1,738,042		1,738,042		22,723,776		26,199,860
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	oeds7	Argentina	Ar$	12.28%	11.75%		-		-	��		-		-		-		-		-
94,271,000-3	Enersis S.A.	Chile	Yankee bonds 2016	USA	US$	7.69%	7.38%		2,529,192		7,587,577			10,116,769		151,478,122		-		-		151,478,122
94,271,000-3	Enersis S.A.	Chile	Yankee bonds 2026	USA	US$	7.76%	7.40%		7,750		23,250			31,000		62,000		62,000		698,913		822,913
94,271,000-3	Enersis S.A.	Chile	Yankee bonds 2014	USA	US$	7.76%	6.60%		185,115,803		-			185,115,803		-		-		-		-
94,271,000-3	Enersis S.A.	Chile	UF 269 bonds	Chile	U.F.	7.02%	5.75%		591,317		4,451,182			5,042,499		9,872,148		9,560,495		15,867,590		35,300,233
91,081,000-6	Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.	Chile	The Bank of New York Mellon - First Issue S-1	USA	US$	7.96%	7.88%		2,217,451		6,652,353			8,869,804		17,739,609		17,739,609		180,634,922		216,114,140
91,081,000-6	Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.	Chile	The Bank of New York Mellon - First Issue S-2	USA	US$	7.40%	7.33%		708,960		2,126,881			2,835,841		5,671,683		5,671,683		68,415,434		79,758,800
91,081,000-6	Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.	Chile	The Bank of New York Mellon - First Issue S-3	USA	US$	8.26%	8.13%		449,981		1,349,943			1,799,924		3,599,848		3,599,848		150,474,683		157,674,379
91,081,000-6	Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.	Chile	The Bank of New York Mellon - 144 - A	USA	US$	8.50%	8.35%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
91,081,000-6	Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.	Chile	The Bank of New York Mellon - 144 - A	USA	US$	8.83%	8.63%		2,362,286		7,086,859			9,449,145		111,406,931		-		-		111,406,931
91,081,000-6	Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.	Chile	Banco Santander Chile - 317 Series-H	Chile	U.F.	7.17%	6.20%		1,528,468		9,275,107			10,803,575		20,402,902		18,797,239		71,006,646		110,206,787
91,081,000-6	Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.	Chile	Banco Santander Chile - 522 Series-M	Chile	U.F.	4.82%	4.75%		3,915,630		11,746,890			15,662,520		31,325,041		31,325,041		323,567,202		386,217,284
91,081,000-6	Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.	Chile	Banco Santander Chile - 318 Series-K	Chile	U.F.	3.86%	3.86%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
91,081,000-6	Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.	Chile	Banco Santander Chile - 264 Series-F	Chile	U.F.	6.44%	6.44%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	A-10 bonds	Colombia	CP	6.89%	6.72%		939,183		2,817,550			3,756,733		57,903,035		-		-		57,903,035
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	A102 bonds	Colombia	CP	6.89%	6.72%		178,890		536,671			715,561		11,029,149		-		-		11,029,149
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	B-103 bonds	Colombia	CP	7.00%	7.00%		734,499		2,203,498			2,937,997		5,875,994		46,856,691		-		52,732,685
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	A5 bonds	Colombia	CP	5.54%	5.43%		13,616,326		-			13,616,326		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	B10 bonds	Colombia	CP	7.64%	7.43%		824,131		2,472,393			3,296,524		6,593,049		6,593,049		44,205,339		57,391,437
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	B15 bonds	Colombia	CP	7.96%	7.73%		297,055		891,166			1,188,221		2,376,444		2,376,444		21,276,616		26,029,504
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	E5-09 bonds	Colombia	CP	9.27%	9.27%		582,915		25,929,967			26,512,882		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	B09-09 bonds	Colombia	CP	7.76%	7.55%		1,153,945		3,461,835			4,615,780		9,231,559		66,821,758		-		76,053,317
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	B12 bonds	Colombia	CP	7.97%	7.74%		485,500		1,456,499			1,941,999		3,883,998		3,883,998		29,449,526		37,217,522
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Foreign bonds	Colombia	CP	10.17%	10.17%		4,486,961		13,460,883			17,947,844		35,895,687		35,895,687		213,793,324		285,584,698
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Quimbo bonds	Colombia	CP	10.17%	10.17%		624,384		1,873,151			2,497,535		4,995,071		4,995,071		29,750,447		39,740,589
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Quimbo B10 bonds	Colombia	CP	5.34%	5.24%		1,100,769		3,302,308			4,403,077		8,806,155		8,806,155		99,436,473		117,048,783
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Quimbo B15 bonds	Colombia	CP	5.46%	5.36%		753,246		2,259,737			3,012,983		6,025,966		6,025,966		81,666,289		93,718,221
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Quimbo B12-13 bonds	Colombia	CP	6.85%	6.68%		1,648,116		4,944,349			6,592,465		13,184,931		13,184,931		143,514,560		169,884,422
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Quimbo B6-13 bonds	Colombia	CP	6.08%	5.95%		616,960		1,850,879			2,467,839		4,935,677		4,935,677		43,453,010		53,324,364
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	B6-13 bonds	Colombia	CP	6.08%	5.95%		199,976		599,927			799,903		1,599,806		1,599,806		14,084,549		17,284,161
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	US$	6.57%	6.47%		82,595		247,784			330,379		660,757		5,613,285		-		6,274,042
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	S/.	6.41%	6.31%		74,183		222,548			296,731		593,463		593,463		5,739,253		6,926,179
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	S/.	6.38%	6.28%		73,816		221,447			295,263		590,525		590,525		4,872,930		6,053,980
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	S/.	6.86%	6.75%		63,459		3,866,320			3,929,779		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	S/.	6.61%	6.50%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	S/.	6.54%	6.44%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	S/.	6.74%	6.63%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	S/.	6.70%	6.59%		5,408,901		-			5,408,901		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	US$	6.44%	6.34%		80,999		242,996			323,995		647,989		647,989		8,198,326		9,494,304
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	US$	9.20%	9.00%		111,697		5,406,082			5,517,779		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	US$	7.93%	7.78%		81,132		243,395			324,527		649,053		649,053		4,318,583		5,616,689
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	US$	7.25%	7.13%		57,826		173,478			231,304		3,359,066		-		-		3,359,066
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	US$	6.74%	6.63%		84,590		253,769			338,359		5,791,110		-		-		5,791,110
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	US$	6.09%	6.00%		76,610		229,829			306,439		5,791,642		-		-		5,791,642
Foreign	Edegel S.A.A	Peru	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	US$	5.87%	5.78%		73,816		221,449			295,265		590,532		590,532		5,772,090		6,953,154
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	US$	6.15%	6.06%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	S/.	6.57%	6.47%		-		-			-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Peru	Banco Continental	Peru	S/.	6.25%	6.16%		4,724,809		-			4,724,809		-		-		-		-
			Total						323.278.458		203.603.475			526.881.933		829.996.345		680,067,487		1,786,185,487		3,296,249,319

December 31, 2012														January 1, 2012
Current						Non-current								Current						Non-current
Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current		Less than 90 days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five years		Total Non- current
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		6,698,731		102,230,946		108,929,677		59.162.266		133.237.309		-		192.399.575
	649,029		1,947,086		2,596,115		18,249,614		14,355,442		-		32,605,056		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	1,306,206		16,457,896		17,764,102		30,303,386		-		-		30,303,386		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	1,563,703		4,691,110		6,254,813		12,509,626		39,253,525		16,499,357		68,262,508		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	486,106		1,458,317		1,944,423		3,888,844		25,374,189		-		29,263,033		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	2,063,384		6,190,152		8,253,536		16,507,071		39,266,574		53,772,545		109,546,190		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	1,578,308		4,734,924		6,313,232		69,271,323		-		-		69,271,323		1,601,595		5,385,582		6,987,177		74.917.478		-		-		74.917.478
	2,233,916		6,701,749		8,935,665		17,871,330		117,176,843		-		135,048,173		2,268,235		7,627,252		9,895,487		18.295.433		139.590.884		-		157.886.317
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		142,540		9,063,816		9,206,356		-		-		-		-
	452,748		24,509,254		24,962,002		-		-		-		-		369,477		1,242,417		1,611,894		24.349.062		-		-		24.349.062
	457,666		21,816,289		22,273,955		-		-		-		-		467,694		1,572,686		2,040,380		22.071.605		-		-		22.071.605
	464,493		1,393,478		1,857,971		3,715,942		3,715,942		23,519,736		30,951,620		469,953		1,580,283		2,050,236		3.790.614		32.393.688		-		36.184.302
	21,879,751		-		21,879,751		-		-		-		-		346,784		1,166,108		1,512,892		21.620.973		-		-		21.620.973
	682,706		2,048,119		2,730,825		5,461,651		39,717,086		-		45,178,737		717,221		2,411,754		3,128,975		5.785.056		46.931.965		-		52.717.021
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	942,362		16,618,350		17,560,712		15,675,987		-		-		15,675,987		2,539,943		23,718,519		26,258,462		43.973.620		34.824.619		-		78.798.239
	563,189		1,689,567		2,252,756		16,501,261		13,122,127		-		29,623,388		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	2,296,178		6,888,534		9,184,712		18,369,423		63,685,490		27,257,611		109,312,524		2,577,076		8,665,772		11,242,848		20.786.524		32.496.725		90.131.132		143.414.381
	65,162		195,487		260,649		4,844,664		-		-		4,844,664		63,823		214,613		278,436		5.077.124		-		-		5.077.124
	78,864		236,592		315,456		4,905,580		-		-		4,905,580		76,203		256,244		332,447		5.180.728		-		-		5.180.728
	157,047		471,140		628,187		9,793,310		-		-		9,793,310		151,944		510,933		662,877		10.342.337		-		-		10.342.337
	122,881		368,642		491,523		6,370,075		-		-		6,370,075		126,147		424,187		550,334		1.017.494		6.418.045		-		7.435.539
	68,809		206,427		275,236		550,471		3,402,611		-		3,953,082		70,593		237,379		307,972		569.399		4.271.435		-		4.840.834
	50,772		152,315		203,087		406,174		2,951,787		-		3,357,961		52,086		175,146		227,232		420.122		3.482.779		-		3.902.901
	101,946		305,837		407,783		815,566		5,175,028		-		5,990,594		104,593		351,709		456,302		843.643		6.430.925		-		7.274.568
	46,822		2,925,647		2,972,469		-		-		-		-		48,033		161,519		209,552		3.034.955		-		-		3.034.955
	55,380		166,139		221,519		4,050,553		-		-		4,050,553		56,814		191,045		247,859		458.259		3.910.505		-		4.368.764
	129,963		389,890		519,853		8,376,812		-		-		8,376,812		133,328		448,335		581,663		1.075.419		8.019.674		-		9.095.093
	79,787		239,362		319,149		4,853,567		-		-		4,853,567		81,845		275,214		357,059		5.284.017		-		-		5.284.017
	83,444		250,333		333,777		667,555		4,860,882		-		5,528,437		85,597		287,833		373,430		690.422		5.790.825		-		6.481.247
	53,186		2,851,853		2,905,039		-		-		-		-		54,563		183,474		238,037		2.962.950		-		-		2.962.950
	108,459		5,777,404		5,885,863		-		-		-		-		111,264		374,141		485,405		6.004.573		-		-		6.004.573
	90,609		271,826		362,435		5,685,232		-		-		5,685,232		92,948		312,552		405,500		6.177.926		-		-		6.177.926
	99,182		297,547		396,729		793,458		6,161,764		-		6,955,222		101,873		342,563		444,436		821.704		6.921.650		-		7.743.354
	62,025		186,076		248,101		4,085,997		-		-		4,085,997		63,749		214,363		278,112		514.191		3.917.515		-		4.431.706
	104,449		313,346		417,795		835,588		835,588		6,746,909		8,418,085		107,277		360,734		468,011		865.289		2.512.167		6.209.886		9.587.342
	60,855		182,566		243,421		486,841		4,221,751		-		4,708,592		62,548		210,325		272,873		504.506		4.816.026		-		5.320.532
	65,829		197,487		263,316		526,631		526,631		4,040,453		5,093,715		68,516		230,393		298,909		552.643		5.457.537		-		6.010.180
	119,124		357,371		476,495		952,989		952,989		9,575,198		11,481,176		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	143,745		431,236		574,981		1,149,961		1,149,961		16,862,736		19,162,658		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	755,962		-		755,962		-		-		-		-		15,147		821,547		836,694		-		-		-		-
	5,664,849		-		5,664,849		-		-		-		-		98,656		6,111,343		6,209,999		-		-		-		-
	3,814,063		-		3,814,063		-		-		-		-		60,381		203,039		263,420		3.893.541		-		-		3.893.541
	94,076		282,228		376,304		5,147,475		-		-		5,147,475		96,506		324,515		421,021		778.412		4.863.685		-		5.642.097
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		51,945		2,662,041		2,713,986		-		-		-		-
	5,669,822		-		5,669,822		-		-		-		-		6,276,791		-		6,276,791		-		-		-		-
	133,594		400,781		534,375		1,068,749		1,068,749		11,881,733		14,019,231		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		3,926,418		-		3,926,418		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		7,975,989		-		7,975,989		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		6,065,488		-		6,065,488		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		4,936,463		-		4,936,463		-		-		-		-
	90,003		270,010		360,013		720,026		720,026		10,360,492		11,800,544		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		116,551		4,100,169		4,216,720		-		-		-		-
	2,297,908		6,893,723		9,191,631		18,383,260		128,761,093		-		147,144,353		2,492,775		8,382,298		10,875,073		20.106.557		158.089.452		-		178.196.009
	7,041		21,124		28,165		56,331		56,331		664,287		776,949		7,638		25,685		33,323		61.611		178.874		660.104		900.589
	3,166,579		9,499,738		12,666,317		168,631,075		-		-		168,631,075		9,552,437		5,637,390		15,189,827		195.829.642		-		-		195.829.642
	669,150		4,474,479		5,143,629		10,049,549		9,701,503		20,334,599		40,085,651		837,156		5,068,678		5,905,834		10.912.682		27.372.736		11.324.847		49.610.265
	1,975,290		5,925,870		7,901,160		15,802,321		15,802,321		171,658,937		203,263,579		703,310		2,364,976		3,068,286		5.672.852		16.469.819		84.974.171		107.116.842
	630,588		1,891,764		2,522,352		5,044,703		5,044,703		78,366,028		88,455,434		2,204,773		7,413,852		9,618,625		17.783.553		51.630.453		177.679.777		247.093.783
	406,804		1,220,413		1,627,217		3,254,435		3,254,435		146,965,217		153,474,087		2,384,734		8,018,994		10,403,728		19.235.104		109.486.718		-		128.721.822
	4,127,302		198,393,750		202,521,052		-		-		-		-		4,635,971		15,589,088		20,225,059		218.659.499		-		-		218.659.499
	2,125,688		6,377,065		8,502,753		109,928,712		-		-		109,928,712		457,603		1,538,753		1,996,356		3.690.997		10.715.959		162.562.141		176.969.097
	1,684,588		9,620,049		11,304,637		21,363,797		19,703,160		79,761,211		120,828,168		2,124,125		11,532,964		13,657,089		24.422.163		58.670.925		66.097.899		149.190.987
	4,117,526		12,352,579		16,470,105		32,940,209		32,940,209		339,022,623		404,903,041		4,973,783		16,725,028		21,698,811		40.118.205		136.748.818		305.217.831		482.084.854
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		1,746,368		5,872,402		7,618,770		14.086.088		40.895.714		145.246.623		200.228.425
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		31,321,953		-		31,321,953		-		-		-		-
	1,102,280		3,306,839		4,409,119		62,006,104		-		-		62,006,104		1,150,327		3,868,134		5,018,461		9.278.465		-		56.536.718		65.815.183
	209,956		629,869		839,825		11,810,678		-		-		11,810,678		216,825		729,104		945,929		1.748.896		10.768.120		-		12.517.016
	894,296		2,682,888		3,577,184		7,154,367		50,204,631		-		57,358,998		1,129,556		3,798,288		4,927,844		9.110.927		-		62.840.794		71.951.721
	223,748		671,245		894,993		13,536,136		-		-		13,536,136		179,093		602,226		781,319		14.001.389		-		-		14.001.389
	946,998		2,840,995		3,787,993		7,575,987		7,575,987		47,759,102		62,911,076		989,794		3,328,320		4,318,114		7.983.617		-		65.971.663		73.955.280
	339,573		1,018,719		1,358,292		2,716,583		2,716,583		23,403,981		28,837,147		354,285		1,191,331		1,545,616		2.857.637		8.296.492		21.943.442		33.097.571
	577,113		1,731,338		2,308,451		26,317,195		-		-		26,317,195		569,828		1,916,126		2,485,954		28.105.888		-		-		28.105.888
	1,325,639		3,976,917		5,302,556		10,605,111		10,605,111		62,175,621		83,385,843		1,328,332		4,466,698		5,795,030		10.714.236		84.115.563		-		94.829.799
	555,900		1,667,701		2,223,601		4,447,203		4,447,203		32,223,666		41,118,072		556,858		1,872,513		2,429,371		4.491.583		13.040.277		28.416.894		45.948.754
	618,169		1,854,506		2,472,675		4,945,349		4,945,349		31,993,565		41,884,263		610,366		2,052,440		2,662,806		4.923.173		-		43.251.722		48.174.895
	4,442,297		13,326,891		17,769,188		35,538,377		35,538,377		229,912,869		300,989,623		4,386,227		14,749,291		19,135,518		35.379.018		-		310.816.486		346.195.504
	1,264,032		3,792,096		5,056,128		10,112,255		10,112,255		106,512,256		126,736,766		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	859,450		2,578,349		3,437,799		6,875,596		6,875,596		88,532,392		102,283,584		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	79,897		239,692		319,589		639,178		639,178		4,814,505		6,092,861		97,652		235,722		333,374		616.363		1.789.469		5.500.435		7.906.267
	73,875		221,624		295,499		590,997		590,997		6,023,737		7,205,731		160,276		-		160,276		-		-		10.819.378		10.819.378
	73,509		220,527		294,036		588,072		588,072		5,159,550		6,335,694		79,552		267,504		347,056		4.950.085		-		-		4.950.085
	63,196		189,587		252,783		3,923,716		-		-		3,923,716		78,051		262,457		340,508		4.868.653		-		-		4.868.653
	4,770,062		-		4,770,062		-		-		-		-		77,676		261,195		338,871		5.051.067		-		-		5.051.067
	75,338		4,744,218		4,819,556		-		-		-		-		73,923		248,577		322,500		5.114.463		-		-		5.114.463
	77,532		4,771,525		4,849,057		-		-		-		-		89,628		301,387		391,015		5.873.636		-		-		5.873.636
	87,352		262,056		349,408		5,400,952		-		-		5,400,952		77,300		259,934		337,234		4.919.966		-		-		4.919.966
	78,353		235,060		313,413		626,827		626,827		7,948,123		9,201,777		83,851		281,959		365,810		2.639.913		-		8.220.849		10.860.762
	108,049		324,147		432,196		5,049,991		-		-		5,049,991		115,630		388,820		504,450		5.903.654		-		-		5.903.654
	78,482		235,446		313,928		627,856		627,856		4,249,866		5,505,578		83,988		282,422		366,410		677.444		6.208.170		-		6.885.614
	55,926		167,777		223,703		3,285,038		-		-		3,285,038		59,850		201,252		261,102		3.783.487		-		-		3.783.487
	81,827		245,481		327,308		654,617		4,978,803		-		5,633,420		87,568		294,460		382,028		706.319		6.190.863		-		6.897.182
	74,108		222,323		296,431		592,861		5,010,196		-		5,603,057		79,307		266,681		345,988		639.685		6.096.813		-		6.736.498
	71,406		214,217		285,623		571,246		571,246		5,573,336		6,715,828		85,503		287,515		373,018		689.660		6.853.252		-		7.542.912
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		75,800		254,886		330,686		611.394		1.775.041		5.728.426		8.114.861
	75,703		4,870,634		4,946,337		-		-		-		-		75,424		253,624		329,048		608.367		6.582.587		-		7.190.954
	72,046		216,138		288,184		4,718,008		-		-		4,718,008		64,842		218,041		282,883		4.267.060		-		-		4.267.060
	96,355,030		449,001,726		545,356,756		911,777,424		749,613,007		1,673,572,241		3,334,962,672		125,993,266		315,961,506		441,954,772		1,102,917,283		1,248,264,073		1,670,151,218		4,021,332,574

F-167

c ) Financial lease obligations

i. Financial lease obligations by company

Taxpayer ID No.   (RUT)	Company	Country	Taxpayer ID No.   (RUT)	Financial Institution	Country	Currency	Nominal   Interest Rate		December 31, 2013
									Current						Non-current
									Less than 90   days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five   years		Total Non-current
91,081,000-6	Endesa S.A. (Chile)	Chile	87.509.100-K	Abengoa Chile	Chile	US$		6.50%		581,073		1,742,183		2,323,256		4,637,718		4,624,689		13,024,032		22,286,439
Foreign	Edegel	Peru	Foreign	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	US$		2.02%		1,486,952		4,421,036		5,907,988		15,369,699		11,585,284		-		26,954,983
Foreign	Edelnor	Peru	Foreign	BBVA	Peru	S/.		6.27%		1,023,566		1,730,562		2,754,128		503,722						503,722
Foreign	Caboblanco	Peru	Foreign	Banco Scotiabank	Peru	US$		5.80%		1,778,978		5,337,073		7,116,051		14,233,269		14,234,979		25,785,333		54,253,581
Foreign	Edesur S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	COMAFI	Argentina	Ar$		25.15%		74,643		105,938		180,581		-		-		-		-
			Total							4,945,212		13,336,792		18,282,004		34,744,408		30,444,952		38,809,365		103,998,725

December 31, 2012														January 1, 2012
Current						Non-current								Current						Non-current
Less than 90   days		More than 90   days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five   years		Total Non-current		Less than 90   days		More than 90 days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five years		More than five   years		Total Non-current
	517,486		1,552,682		2,070,168		4,142,238		4,145,057		13,854,905		22,142,200		567,586		1,900,568		2,468,154		4,556,135		12,220,275		10,867,880		27,644,290
	1,406,430		4,177,025		5,583,455		12,608,401		17,546,542		-		30,154,943		2,137,134		6,953,795		9,090,929		11,858,222		27,292,271		-		39,150,493
	1,230,672		3,009,713		4,240,385		2,238,071		-		-		2,238,071		1,178,706		3,660,137		4,838,843		2,604,306		-		-		2,604,306
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	216,766		313,356		530,122		216,179		-		-		216,179		170,578		411,253		581,831		673,700		-		-		673,700
	3,371,354		9,052,776		12,424,130		19,204,889		21,691,599		13,854,905		54,751,393		4,054,004		12,925,753		16,979,757		19,692,363		39,512,546		10,867,880		70,072,789

d ) Other liabilities

i. Other liabilities by company

Taxpayer ID No. (RUT)	Company	Country	Taxpayer ID   No. (RUT)	Financial Institution	Country	Currency	Nominal   Interest Rate		December 31, 2013
									Current						Non-current
									Less than 90 days		More than 90   days		Total Current		One to three years		Three to five   years		More than five   years		Total Non-current
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Mitsubishi (secured debt)	Argentina	US$		7.42%		72,176,231		-		72,176,231		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Mitsubishi (unsecured debt)	Argentina	US$		7.42%		2,242,057		-		2,242,057		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Endesa Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Other	Argentina	Ar$		17.29%		922,114		2,556,048		3,478,162		1,528,787		-		-		1,528,787
96,827,970-K	Endesa Eco S.A.	Chile	96,601,250-1	Inversiones Centinela S.A.	Chile	US$		6.10%		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Hidroinvest S.A.	Argentina	Foreign	Other	Argentina	US$		2.67%		767		145,344		146,111		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Dock Sud	Argentina	Foreign	YPF Internacional	Argentina	US$		19.79%		48,246		144,738		192,984		1,127,937		-		-		1,127,937
Foreign	Dock Sud	Argentina	Foreign	YPF Argentina	Argentina	US$		5.27%		27,505,551		-		27,505,551		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Dock Sud	Argentina	Foreign	PAN American Energy	Argentina	US$		3.27%		41,263		3,656,181		3,697,444		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Dock Sud	Argentina	Foreign	Repsol International Finance	Argentina	US$		3.91%		11,400		2,065,397		2,076,797		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Ampla Energía E Servicios S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Eletrobrás	Brazil	R$		6.54%		417,902		1,223,454		1,641,356		3,009,621		2,193,266		958,889		6,161,776
Foreign	Ampla Energía E Servicios S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Bndes	Brazil	R$		8.58%		5,428,006		21,946,195		27,374,201		61,033,558		49,465,992		31,860,390		142,359,940
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Eletrobras	Brazil	R$		7.77%		4,024,633		11,802,083		15,826,716		11,961,008		10,483,211		1,206,494		23,650,713
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Banco do Brasil	Brazil	US$		6.26%		898,802		2,638,502		3,537,304		6,553,788		5,415,570		6,647,844		18,617,202
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Banco do Brasil	Brazil	R$		13.73%		941,899		-		941,899		-		-		-		-
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	BNDES	Brazil	R$		4.47%		16,315		83,473		99,788		124,523		124,523		1,791,238		2,040,284
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Banco do Nordeste	Brazil	R$		8.70%		3,748,035		14,210,032		17,958,067		18,239,180		16,216,681		13,738,332		48,194,193
Foreign	Compañía Energética Do Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Foreign	Faelce	Brazil	R$		13.22%		1,482,648		1,470,262		2,952,910		-		-		-		-
			Total							119,905,869		61,941,709		181,847,578		103,578,402		83,899,243		56,203,187		243,680,832

December 31, 2012														January 1, 2012
Current						Non-current								Current						Non-current
Less than 90   days		More than 90   days		Total Current		One to three   years		Three to five   years		More than five   years		Total Non-current		Less than 90   days		More than 90   days		Total Current		One to three   years		Three to five   years		More than five   years		Total Non-   current
	56,264,078		-		56,264,078		-		-		-		-		14,958,554		10,030,787		24,989,341		32,747,272		24,243,194		-		56,990,466
	11,534,186		-		11,534,186		-		-		-		-		2,296,618		67,527		2,364,145		161,976		1,139,597		-		1,301,573
	799,346		5,846,518		6,645,864		6,019,282		-		-		6,019,282		547,198		884,765		1,431,963		-		-		-		-
	2,017,319		-		2,017,319		-		-		-		-		-		3,930,734		3,930,734		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	285,377		965,266		1,250,643		3,045,792		2,592,406		1,861,196		7,499,394		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	4,536,007		13,214,919		17,750,926		31,774,969		27,224,080		14,032,389		73,031,438		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	1,190,648		3,151,597		4,342,245		6,954,127		6,017,081		8,923,825		21,895,033		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	16,441		113,614		130,055		149,411		115,228		1,694,259		1,958,898		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	1,116,763		3,235,164		4,351,927		935,799		-		-		935,799		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	3,934,967		9,755,961		13,690,928		12,079,881		-		-		12,079,881		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	2,267,540		8,719,128		10,986,668		22,974,521		11,730,771		6,498,966		41,204,258		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	121,287		3,117,565		3,238,852		1,498,141		-		-		1,498,141		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	84,083,959		48,119,732		132,203,691		85,431,923		47,679,566		33,010,635		166,122,124		17,802,370		14,913,813		32,716,183		32,909,248		25,382,791		-		58,292,039

F-168

APPENDIX 5 DETAILS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES IN FOREIGN CURRENCY:

This appendix forms an integral part of the Enersis financial statements.

The detail of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies is the following:

ASSETS	Foreign Currency	Functional Currency	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents				243,248,751		4,678,601		19,517,825
	U.S. dollar	Chilean peso		228,296,107		-
	U.S. dollar	Colombian peso		27,448		10,947		5,634
	U.S. dollar	Peruvian nuevo sol		12,971,259		4,233,557		3,201,968
	U.S. dollar	Argentine peso		1,953,937		434,097		16,310,223
Accounts receivable from related companies				28,384,147		14,361,204		20,299,704
	U.S. dollar	Chilean peso		28,384,147		14,361,204		20,299,704
Total current assets other than assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations				271,632,898		19,039,805		39,817,529
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS				271,632,898		19,039,805		39,817,529
Investments accounted for using the equity method				171,750,431		141,911,625		141,911,625
	U.S. dollar	Chilean peso		138,667,415		105,615,031		105,615,031
	Colombian peso	Chilean peso		33,083,016		33,527,186		33,527,186
	Argentine peso	Chilean peso		-		2,769,408		2,769,408
Goodwill				395,020,857		426,209,853		477,068,142
	Brazilian real	Peruvian nuevo sol		8,287,322		8,703,399		10,361,690
	Brazilian real	Chilean peso		242,896,782		272,442,268		313,990,020
	Colombian peso	Chilean peso		11,786,530		11,742,640		11,589,629
	Peruvian nuevo sol	Chilean peso		125,059,831		124,877,836		128,304,143
	Argentine peso	Chilean peso		6,990,392		8,443,710		12,822,660
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS				566,771,288		568,121,478		618,979,767
TOTAL ASSETS				838,404,185		587,161,283		658,797,296

F-169

			12-31-2013							12-31-2012							01-01-2012
			Current Liabilities			Non-current Liabilities				Current Liabilities			Non-current Liabilities				Current Liabilities			Non-current Liabilities
			90 days or     less	91 days to     1 year	Total	More than     1 year to 3     years	More     than 3     years to  5     years	More than     5 years	Total	90 days or     less	91 days to     1 year	Total	More than     1 year to 3     years	More than     3 years to 5     years	More than     5 years	Total	90 days or     less	91 days to     1 year	Total	More than     1 year to 3     years	More than     3 years to 5     years	More than     5 years	Total
	Foreign Currency	Functional     Currency	ThCh$	ThCh$	Current	ThCh$	ThCh$	ThCh$	Non-     current	ThCh$	ThCh$	Current	ThCh$	ThCh$	ThCh$	Non-current	ThCh$	ThCh$	Current	ThCh$	ThCh$	ThCh$	Non-current
LIABILITIES
Other current financial liabilities	U.S. dollar		307,747,217	177,133,879	484,881,096	383,323,064	99,843,837	460,285,486	943,452,387	97,469,345	255,065,083	352,534,428	487,384,775	223,960,388	450,043,533	1,161,388,696	40,083,024	110,007,608	150,090,632	698,191,147	484,059,182	493,795,421	1,676,045,750
	U.S. dollar	Chilean peso	194,815,346	133,412,220	328,227,566	295,488,736	31,697,829	413,247,984	740,434,549	18,090,391	234,307,578	252,397,969	424,225,534	157,063,940	411,509,374	992,798,848	13,719,841	58,161,835	71,881,676	595,227,849	359,668,296	436,744,073	1,391,640,218
	U.S. dollar	Brazilian real	441,332	8,523,199	8,964,531	14,089,112	6,201,875	2,963,170	23,254,157	486,256	7,606,194	8,092,450	16,493,010	9,064,986	3,838,731	29,396,727	644,936	12,599,186	13,244,122	17,532,685	17,877,446	6,352,599	41,762,730
	U.S. dollar	Peruvian     nuevo sol	6,970,851	20,922,911	27,893,762	72,103,844	61,944,133	44,074,332	178,122,309	4,249,373	7,926,216	12,175,589	38,829,516	57,831,462	34,695,428	131,356,406	5,801,056	29,810,106	35,611,162	68,288,019	104,901,377	50,698,749	223,888,145
	U.S. dollar	Argentine peso	105,519,688	14,275,549	119,795,237	1,641,372	-	-	1,641,372	74,643,325	5,225,095	79,868,420	7,836,715	-	-	7,836,715	19,917,191	9,436,481	29,353,672	17,142,594	1,612,063	-	18,754,657
TOTAL LIABILITIES			307,747,217	177,133,879	484,881,096	383,323,064	99,843,837	460,285,486	943,452,387	97,469,345	255,065,083	352,534,428	487,384,775	223,960,388	450,043,533	1,161,388,696	40,083,024	110,007,608	150,090,632	698,191,147	484,059,182	493,795,421	1,676,045,750

F-170

APPENDIX 6 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OFICIO CIRCULAR (OFFICIAL BULLETIN) No. 715 OF FEBRUARY 3, 2012:

This appendix forms an integral part of the Enersis financial statements.

a ) Portfolio stratification

- Trade and other accounts receivable by time in arrears:

Trade and Other Accounts Receivable	Balance at
	12-31-2013
	Up-to-date Portfolio ThCh$		1-30 days in arrears ThCh$		31-60 days in arrears ThCh$		61-90 days in arrears ThCh$		91-120 days in arrears ThCh$		121-150 days in arrears ThCh$		151-180 days in arrears ThCh$		181-210 days in arrears ThCh$		211-250 days in arrears ThCh$		More than 251 days in arrears ThCh$		Total Current ThCh$		Total Non-current ThCh$
Trade receivables, gross		688,559,771		84,451,304		32,613,952		7,862,372		6,501,113		25,830,569		5,393,470		3,855,957		2,669,480		144,514,712		1,002,252,700		181,381,483
Impairment provision		(825,148)		(14,350,566)		(3,978,738)		(2,686,557)		(2,841,657)		(2,050,077)		(2,205,947)		(1,805,495)		(1,276,773)		(115,125,053)		(147,146,011)		-
Other accounts receivable, gross		199,879,449		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		199,879,449		41,664,190
Impairment provision		(9,722,257)		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		(9,722,257)		-
Total		877,891,815		70,100,738		28,635,214		5,175,815		3,659,456		23,780,492		3,187,523		2,050,462		1,392,707		29,389,659		1,045,263,881		223,045,673
Trade and Other Accounts Receivable	Balance at
	31-12-2012
	Up-to-date Portfolio ThCh$		1-30 days in arrears ThCh$		31-60 days in arrears ThCh$		61-90 days in arrears ThCh$		91-120 days in arrears ThCh$		121-150 days in arrears ThCh$		151-180 days in arrears ThCh$		181-210 days in arrears ThCh$		211-250 days in arrears ThCh$		More than 251 days in arrears ThCh$		Total Current ThCh$		Total Non-current ThCh$
Trade receivables, gross		568,603,924		83,059,091		30,146,987		14,208,442		6,950,901		6,285,601		4,593,720		3,939,017		4,078,959		161,254,293		883,120,935		163,265,685
Impairment provision		(1,721,285)		(801,133)		(383,295)		(610,266)		(2,623,541)		(1,822,179)		(1,995,174)		(1,258,369)		(916,660)		(133,909,619)		(146,041,521)		-
Other accounts receivable, gross		121,511,946		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		121,511,946		39,634,657
Impairment provision		(11,800,249)																		-		(11,800,249)		-
Total		676,594,336		82,257,958		29,763,692		13,598,176		4,327,360		4,463,422		2,598,546		2,680,648		3,162,299		27,344,674		846,791,111		202,900,342
Trade and Other Accounts Receivable	Balance at
	01-01-2012
	Up-to-date Portfolio ThCh$		1-30 days in arrears ThCh$		31-60 days in arrears ThCh$		61-90 days in arrears ThCh$		91-120 days in arrears ThCh$		121-150 days in arrears ThCh$		151-180 days in arrears ThCh$		181-210 days in arrears ThCh$		211-250 days in arrears ThCh$		More than 251 days in arrears ThCh$		Total Current ThCh$		Total Non-current ThCh$
Trade receivables, gross		534,607,770		79,940,683		35,672,835		12,874,596		8,896,804		7,584,496		5,471,489		8,895,281		4,139,605		347,989,128		1,046,072,687		182,387,693
Impairment provision		(2,786,319)		(489,464)		(185,027)		(4,711,605)		(3,233,750)		(2,895,859)		(4,921,080)		(5,688,359)		(1,381,095)		(155,804,524)		(182,097,082)		(999,510)
Other accounts receivable, gross		57,740,000		-		-		1,942,424		-		-		790,882		-		-		26,884,891		87,358,197		261,740,309
Impairment provision		(1,326,089)		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		(1,326,089)		-
Total		588,235,362		79,451,219		35,487,808		10,105,415		5,663,054		4,688,637		1,341,291		3,206,922		2,758,510		219,069,495		950,007,713		443,128,492

F-171

- By type of portfolio:

Time in Arrears	Balance at												Balance at												Balance at
	12-31-2013												12-31-2012												01-01-2012
	Non-renegotiated Portfolio				Renegotiated Portfolio				Total Gross Portfolio				Non-renegotiated Portfolio				Renegotiated Portfolio				Total Gross Portfolio				Non-renegotiated Portfolio				Renegotiated Portfolio				Total Gross Portfolio
	Number of Clients		Gross Amount ThCh$		Number of Clients		Gross Amount ThCh$		Number of Clients		Gross Amount ThCh$		Number of Clients		Gross Amount ThCh$		Number of Clients		Gross Amount ThCh$		Number of Clients		Gross Amount ThCh$		Number of Clients		Gross Amount ThCh$		Number of Clients		Gross Amount ThCh$		Number of Clients		Gross Amount ThCh$
Up-to-date		10,181,482		675,688,355		111,812		12,871,416		10,293,294		688,559,771		10,265,337		550,831,089		122,447		17,772,835		10,387,784		568,603,924		7,908,458		513,850,924		92,748		20,756,846		8,001,206		534,607,770
1 to 30 days		2,176,060		78,924,126		89,451		5,527,178		2,265,511		84,451,304		2,063,408		78,172,320		84,147		4,886,771		2,147,555		83,059,091		2,128,913		75,776,992		16,026		4,163,691		2,144,939		79,940,683
31 to 60 days		408,044		30,106,897		28,598		2,507,055		436,642		32,613,952		370,463		27,695,081		26,791		2,451,906		397,254		30,146,987		423,750		28,581,319		49,184		7,091,516		472,934		35,672,835
61 to 90 days		83,717		6,311,465		23,208		1,550,907		106,925		7,862,372		76,346		12,305,773		22,786		1,902,669		99,132		14,208,442		133,395		11,531,589		795		1,343,007		134,190		12,874,596
91 to 120 days		58,782		5,220,020		14,156		1,281,093		72,938		6,501,113		54,817		5,352,744		14,208		1,598,157		69,025		6,950,901		113,101		7,636,149		6,420		1,260,655		119,521		8,896,804
121 to 150 days		47,384		24,672,166		14,022		1,158,403		61,406		25,830,569		43,467		4,856,977		14,030		1,428,624		57,497		6,285,601		98,637		6,367,912		8,836		1,216,584		107,473		7,584,496
151 to 180 days		35,463		4,004,716		9,548		1,388,754		45,011		5,393,470		34,826		3,371,643		9,554		1,222,077		44,380		4,593,720		89,794		3,355,049		8,423		2,116,440		98,217		5,471,489
181 to 210 days		20,473		2,909,044		15,462		946,913		35,935		3,855,957		18,937		2,517,908		15,500		1,421,109		34,437		3,939,017		36,235		7,811,862		3,180		1,083,419		39,415		8,895,281
211 to 250 days		17,899		1,904,948		10,690		764,532		28,589		2,669,480		17,650		3,125,162		10,701		953,797		28,351		4,078,959		24,108		3,162,199		2,565		977,406		26,673		4,139,605
More than 251 days		451,967		117,675,353		19,388		26,839,359		471,355		144,514,712		312,565		151,390,502		20,018		9,863,791		332,583		161,254,293		847,486		312,794,999		43,791		35,194,129		891,277		347,989,128
Total		13,481,271		947,417,090		336,335		54,835,610		13,817,606		1,002,252,700		13,257,816		839,619,199		340,182		43,501,736		13,597,998		883,120,935		11,803,877		970,868,994		231,968		75,203,693		12,035,845		1,046,072,687

b ) Portfolio in default and in legal collection process:

Portfolio in Default and in Legal Collection Process	Balance at		Balance at			Balance at
	12-31-2013		12-31-2012			01-01-2012
	Number of Clients	Amount  ThCh$	Number of Clients	Amount  ThCh$		Number of Clients	Amount  ThCh$
Notes receivable in default	158,928	15,316,981	154,004		19,226,955	50,995	17,482,266
Notes receivable in legal collection process (*)	9,149	10,640,373	11,294		22,616,860	11,033	26,318,280
Total	168,077	25,957,354	165,298		41,843,815	62,028	43,800,546

(*)Legal collections are included in the portfolio in arrears.

F-172

c ) Provisions and write-offs:

Provisions and Write-offs	Balance at
	12-31-2013	12-31-2012
	ThCh$	ThCh$
Provision for non-renegotiated portfolio	19,629,701	25,406,355
Provision for renegotiated portfolio	13,924,936	7,274,539
Write-offs during the period	(18,827,998)	(28,552,888)
Total	14,726,639	4,128,006

d ) Number and amount of operations:

Number and Amount of Operations	Balance at
	12-31-2013		12-31-2012
	Total detail by type of   operation Last  Quarter	Total detail by type of   operation Annual Accumulation	Total detail by type of   operation Last Quarter	Total detail by type   of operation Annual   Accumulation
	ThCh$	ThCh$	ThCh$	ThCh$
Impairment provision and recoveries
Number of operations	1,850,913	2,005,485	1,678,956	1,679,017
Amount of operations, in ThCh$	5,492,566	33,554,637	19,069,326	32,680,894

F-173

APPENDIX 6.1 COMPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON TRADE RECEIVABLES:

This appendix forms an integral part of the Enersis financial statements.

a ) Portfolio stratification

- Trade receivables by time in arrears:

Trade Receivables	Balance at
	12-31-2013
	Up to date		1-30 days in arrears		31-60 days in arrears		61-90 days in arrears		91-120 days in arrears		121-150 days in arrears		151-180 days in arrears		181-210 days in arrears		211-250 days in arrears		More than 251 days in arrears		Total Current		Total Non- current
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Generation and transmission receivables		256,065,253		5,292,261		195,439		265,303		76,876		21,235,768		11,658		17,575		4,983		56,759,576		339,924,692		160,840,485
-Large clients		184,562,721		751,245		157,913		69,022		70,393		21,226,096		1,050		118		845		3,093,213		209,932,616		-
-Institutional clients		43,079,880		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		43,079,880		153,021,560
-Others		28,422,652		4,541,016		37,526		196,281		6,483		9,672		10,608		17,457		4,138		53,666,363		86,912,196		7,818,925
Impairment provision		(317,421)		-		-		(189,965)		-		(55,494)		-		-		-		(54,451,658)		(55,014,538)		-
Non-invoiced services		161,283,323		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		161,283,323		1,510,879
Invoiced services		94,781,930		5,292,261		195,439		265,303		76,876		21,235,768		11,658		17,575		4,983		56,759,576		178,641,369		159,329,606
Distribution receivables		432,494,518		79,159,043		32,418,513		7,597,069		6,424,237		4,594,801		5,381,812		3,838,382		2,664,497		87,755,136		662,328,008		20,540,998
-Mass-market clients		285,898,592		57,949,731		21,036,349		4,852,305		4,482,227		2,946,126		3,130,574		1,967,081		1,403,333		37,968,646		421,634,964		13,849,395
-Large clients		104,697,460		16,582,507		5,598,217		1,435,871		701,981		710,996		988,052		908,593		442,381		27,308,100		159,374,158		2,103,134
-Institutional clients		41,898,466		4,626,805		5,783,947		1,308,893		1,240,029		937,679		1,263,186		962,708		818,783		22,478,390		81,318,886		4,588,469
Impairment provision		(507,727)		(14,350,566)		(3,978,738)		(2,496,592)		(2,841,657)		(1,994,583)		(2,205,947)		(1,805,495)		(1,276,773)		(60,673,395)		(92,131,473)		-
Non-invoiced services		205,202,092		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		205,202,092		699,393
Invoiced services		227,292,426		79,159,043		32,418,513		7,597,069		6,424,237		4,594,801		5,381,812		3,838,382		2,664,497		87,755,136		457,125,916		19,841,605
Total Trade Receivables, Gross		688,559,771		84,451,304		32,613,952		7,862,372		6,501,113		25,830,569		5,393,470		3,855,957		2,669,480		144,514,712		1,002,252,700		181,381,483
Total Impairment Provision		(825,148)		(14,350,566)		(3,978,738)		(2,686,557)		(2,841,657)		(2,050,077)		(2,205,947)		(1,805,495)		(1,276,773)		(115,125,053)		(147,146,011)		-
Total Trade Receivables, Net		687,734,623		70,100,738		28,635,214		5,175,815		3,659,456		23,780,492		3,187,523		2,050,462		1,392,707		29,389,659		855,106,689		181,381,483

Since not all of our commercial databases in our Group’s different subsidiaries distinguish whether the final electricity service consumer is a natural or legal person, the main management segmentation used by all the subsidiaries to monitor and follow up on trade receivables is the following:

- Mass-market clients

- Large clients

- Institutional clients

F-174

Trade Receivables	Balance at
	12-31-2012
	Up to date		1-30 days in arrears		31-60 days in arrears		61-90 days in arrears		91-120 days in arrears		121-150 days in arrears		151-180 days in arrears		181-210 days in arrears		211-250 days in arrears		More than 251 days in arrears		Total Current		Total Non- current
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Generation and transmission receivables		156,758,891		742,503		47,700		4,335,174		308,432		274,643		28,484		-		311		66,123,436		228,619,574		140,323,852
-Large clients		109,763,097		129,281		635		6,290		82,886		272,789		2		-		311		18,340,890		128,596,181		-
-Institutional clients		18,748,525		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		18,748,525		140,323,852
-Others		28,247,269		613,222		47,065		4,328,884		225,546		1,854		28,482		-		-		47,782,546		81,274,868		-
Impairment provision		(260,312)		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		(56,996,601)		(57,256,913)		-
Non-invoiced services		65,705,344		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		65,705,344		-
Invoiced services		91,053,549		742,502		47,700		4,335,174		308,432		274,643		28,484		-		311		66,123,434		162,914,229		140,323,852
Distribution receivables		411,845,033		82,316,588		30,099,287		9,873,268		6,642,469		6,010,958		4,565,236		3,939,017		4,078,648		95,130,857		654,501,361		22,941,833
-Mass-market clients		259,830,210		60,804,653		20,852,068		6,264,287		4,728,733		3,377,404		3,268,952		1,969,631		1,318,356		38,725,572		401,139,866		11,877,739
-Large clients		100,586,755		13,981,623		6,001,473		1,880,278		763,432		864,715		412,233		533,517		636,359		32,626,777		158,287,162		6,095,508
-Institutional clients		51,428,068		7,530,312		3,245,746		1,728,703		1,150,304		1,768,839		884,051		1,435,869		2,123,933		23,778,508		95,074,333		4,968,586
Impairment provision		(1,460,973)		(801,133)		(383,295)		(610,266)		(2,623,541)		(1,822,179)		(1,995,174)		(1,258,369)		(916,660)		(76,913,018)		(88,784,608)		-
Non-invoiced services		207,144,462		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		1,239,251		208,383,713		-
Invoiced services		204,700,571		82,316,587		30,099,287		9,873,268		6,642,469		6,010,958		4,565,236		3,939,017		4,078,648		93,891,605		446,117,646		22,941,833
Total Trade Receivables, Gross		568,603,924		83,059,091		30,146,987		14,208,442		6,950,901		6,285,601		4,593,720		3,939,017		4,078,959		161,254,293		883,120,935		163,265,685
Total Impairment Provision		(1,721,285)		(801,133)		(383,295)		(610,266)		(2,623,541)		(1,822,179)		(1,995,174)		(1,258,369)		(916,660)		(133,909,619)		(146,041,521)		-
Total Trade Receivables, Net		566,882,639		82,257,958		29,763,692		13,598,176		4,327,360		4,463,422		2,598,546		2,680,648		3,162,299		27,344,674		737,079,414		163,265,685

F-175

Trade Receivables	Balance at
	01-01-2012
	Up to date		1-30 days in arrears		31-60 days in arrears		61-90 days in arrears		91-120 days in arrears		121-150 days in arrears		151-180 days in arrears		181-210 days in arrears		211-250 days in arrears		More than 251 days in arrears		Total Current		Total Non- current
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Generation and transmission receivables		276,162,422		2,205,313		84,972		7,284,829		493,005		138,523		1,323,063		-		-		77,148,806		364,840,933		148,953,896
-Large clients		219,872,741		2,205,313		84,972		7,284,829		493,005		138,523		1,323,063		-		-		77,148,806		308,551,252		586,863
-Institutional clients		56,289,681		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		56,289,681		148,367,033
-Others		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Impairment provision		(983,105)		-		-		(4,110,640)		(55,494)		-		-		-		-		(43,766,186)		(48,915,425)		-
Non-invoiced services		108,875,974																				108,875,974		-
Invoiced services		167,286,448		2,205,313		84,972		7,284,829		493,005		138,523		1,323,063		-		-		77,148,806		255,964,959		148,953,896
Distribution receivables		258,445,348		77,735,370		35,587,863		5,589,767		8,403,799		7,445,973		4,148,426		8,895,281		4,139,605		270,840,322		681,231,754		33,433,797
-Mass-market clients		112,922,763		60,157,007		28,341,140		2,984,669		5,486,135		5,666,497		2,738,906		7,186,606		2,699,304		230,163,084		458,346,111		9,995,784
-Large clients		94,208,438		11,240,026		4,312,588		1,311,741		1,519,470		621,819		635,550		776,703		1,015,465		38,272,310		153,914,110		4,622,940
-Institutional clients		51,314,147		6,338,337		2,934,135		1,293,357		1,398,194		1,157,657		773,970		931,972		424,836		2,404,928		68,971,533		18,815,073
Impairment provision		(1,803,214)		(489,464)		(185,027)		(600,965)		(3,178,256)		(2,895,859)		(4,921,080)		(5,688,359)		(1,381,095)		(112,038,338)		(133,181,657)		(999,510)
Non-invoiced services		150,400,140		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		150,400,140		-
Invoiced services		108,045,208		77,735,370		35,587,863		5,589,767		8,403,799		7,445,973		4,148,426		8,895,281		4,139,605		270,840,322		530,831,614		33,433,797
Total Trade Receivables, Gross		534,607,770		79,940,683		35,672,835		12,874,596		8,896,804		7,584,496		5,471,489		8,895,281		4,139,605		347,989,128		1,046,072,687		182,387,693
Total Impairment Provision		(2,786,319)		(489,464)		(185,027)		(4,711,605)		(3,233,750)		(2,895,859)		(4,921,080)		(5,688,359)		(1,381,095)		(155,804,524)		(182,097,082)		(999,510)
Total Trade Receivables, Net		531,821,451		79,451,219		35,487,808		8,162,991		5,663,054		4,688,637		550,409		3,206,922		2,758,510		192,184,604		863,975,605		181,388,183

F-176

-  By type of portfolio:

Type of Portfolio	Balance at
	12-31-2013
	Up to date		1-30 days in arrears		31-60 days in arrears		61-90 days in arrears		91-120 days in arrears		121-150 days in arrears		151-180 days in arrears		181-210 days in arrears		211-250 days in arrears		More than 251 days in arrears		Total Portfolio, Gross
	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION
Non-renegotiated portfolio		249,737,185		5,280,033		157,913		258,987		70,393		21,226,096		1,050		118		845		56,319,709		333,052,329
-Large clients		184,562,721		751,245		157,913		69,022		70,393		21,226,096		1,050		118		845		3,093,213		209,932,616
-Institutional clients		43,079,880		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		43,079,880
-Others		22,094,584		4,528,788		-		189,965		-		-		-		-		-		53,226,496		80,039,833
Renegotiated portfolio		6,328,067		12,228		37,526		6,315		6,483		9,672		10,608		17,457		4,138		439,867		6,872,361
-Large clients		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
-Institutional clients		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
-Others		6,328,067		12,228		37,526		6,315		6,483		9,672		10,608		17,457		4,138		439,867		6,872,361
DISTRIBUTION
Non-renegotiated portfolio		425,951,170		73,644,093		29,948,984		6,052,478		5,149,627		3,446,070		4,003,666		2,908,926		1,904,103		61,355,644		614,364,761
-Mass-market clients		311,636,104		53,508,995		19,066,515		3,774,662		3,565,936		2,138,523		2,465,002		1,390,128		893,718		25,718,451		424,158,034
-Large clients		72,852,582		16,020,452		5,476,620		1,282,142		585,550		596,036		916,028		801,919		393,396		26,640,353		125,565,078
-Institutional clients		41,462,484		4,114,646		5,405,849		995,674		998,141		711,511		622,636		716,879		616,989		8,996,840		64,641,649
Renegotiated portfolio		6,543,349		5,514,950		2,469,529		1,544,592		1,274,610		1,148,731		1,378,146		929,456		760,394		26,399,492		47,963,249
-Mass-market clients		5,776,933		4,440,736		1,969,835		1,077,643		916,293		807,604		665,572		576,953		509,615		12,250,195		28,991,379
-Large clients		330,434		562,054		121,596		153,729		116,431		114,959		72,024		106,674		48,985		667,747		2,294,633
-Institutional clients		435,982		512,160		378,098		313,220		241,886		226,168		640,550		245,829		201,794		13,481,550		16,677,237
Total Portfolio, Gross		688,559,771		84,451,304		32,613,952		7,862,372		6,501,113		25,830,569		5,393,470		3,855,957		2,669,480		144,514,712		1,002,252,700

F-177

Type of Portfolio	Balance at
	12-31-2012
	Up to date ThCh$		1-30 days in arrears ThCh$		31-60 days in arrears ThCh$		61-90 days in arrears ThCh$		91-120 days in arrears ThCh$		121-150 days in arrears ThCh$		151-180 days in arrears ThCh$		181-210 days in arrears ThCh$		211-250 days in arrears ThCh$		More than 251 days in arrears ThCh$		Total Portfolio, Gross ThCh$
GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION
Non-renegotiated portfolio		149,809,130		742,503		47,700		4,311,860		308,432		274,643		4,577		-		311		65,515,191		221,014,347
-Large clients		109,763,097		129,281		635		6,290		82,886		272,789		2		-		311		18,340,890		134,088,055
-Institutional clients		18,748,525		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		18,748,525
-Others		21,297,508		613,222		47,065		4,305,570		225,546		1,854		4,575		-		-		47,174,301		73,669,641
Renegotiated portfolio		6,949,761		-		-		23,314		-		-		23,907		-		-		608,245		7,605,227
-Large clients		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
-Institutional clients		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
-Others		6,949,761		-		-		23,314		-		-		23,907		-		-		608,245		7,605,227
DISTRIBUTION
Non-renegotiated portfolio		401,021,959		77,429,817		27,647,381		7,993,913		5,044,312		4,582,334		3,367,066		2,517,908		3,124,851		85,875,311		618,604,852
-Mass-market clients		251,266,478		57,072,064		19,013,364		4,983,221		3,635,810		2,447,625		2,471,519		1,279,985		728,086		30,917,875		376,860,271
-Large clients		99,871,222		13,443,496		5,862,624		1,745,400		686,275		832,673		378,216		496,147		604,528		32,457,853		162,290,891
-Institutional clients		49,884,259		6,914,257		2,771,393		1,265,292		722,227		1,302,036		517,331		741,776		1,792,237		22,499,583		89,040,006
Renegotiated portfolio		10,823,074		4,886,771		2,451,906		1,879,355		1,598,157		1,428,624		1,198,170		1,421,109		953,797		9,255,546		35,896,509
-Mass-market clients		8,563,870		3,732,736		1,838,663		1,281,086		1,093,058		929,773		797,368		689,639		590,297		7,807,621		27,516,912
-Large clients		715,443		538,049		138,839		134,874		77,077		31,988		34,084		37,435		31,767		168,923		2,750,398
-Institutional clients		1,543,761		615,986		474,404		463,395		428,022		466,863		366,718		694,035		331,733		1,279,002		9,539,359
Total Portfolio, Gross		568,603,924		83,059,091		30,146,987		14,208,442		6,950,901		6,285,601		4,593,720		3,939,017		4,078,959		161,254,293		883,120,935

F-178

Type of Portfolio	Balance at
	01-01-2012
	Up to date ThCh$		1-30 days in arrears ThCh$		31-60 days in arrears ThCh$		61-90 days in arrears ThCh$		91-120 days in arrears ThCh$		121-150 days in arrears ThCh$		151-180 days in arrears ThCh$		181-210 days in arrears ThCh$		211-250 days in arrears ThCh$		More than 251 days in arrears ThCh$		Total Portfolio, Gross ThCh$
GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION
Non-renegotiated portfolio		256,097,955		2,205,313		2,894,669		4,727,650		493,005		-		935,644		-		-		72,143,556		339,497,792
-Large clients		206,702,908		2,205,313		2,894,669		4,727,650		493,005		-		935,644		-		-		72,143,556		290,102,745
-Institutional clients		49,395,047		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		49,395,047
-Others		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Renegotiated portfolio		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
-Large clients		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
-Institutional clients		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
-Others		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
DISTRIBUTION
Non-renegotiated portfolio		257,752,969		73,571,679		25,686,650		6,803,939		7,143,144		6,367,912		2,419,405		7,811,862		3,162,199		240,651,443		631,371,202
-Mass-market clients		116,163,607		56,976,736		19,972,917		4,801,938		5,568,695		5,865,662		1,812,061		7,121,529		2,250,787		205,359,738		425,893,670
-Large clients		93,126,921		11,031,598		3,980,710		1,152,224		1,453,185		490,552		554,707		690,333		911,412		35,291,705		148,683,347
-Institutional clients		48,462,441		5,563,345		1,733,023		849,777		121,264		11,698		52,637		-		-		-		56,794,185
Renegotiated portfolio		20,756,846		4,163,691		7,091,516		1,343,007		1,260,655		1,216,584		2,116,440		1,083,419		977,406		35,194,129		75,203,693
-Mass-market clients		16,403,309		3,111,313		5,410,638		690,352		622,125		532,578		857,606		349,526		267,212		10,304,763		38,549,422
-Large clients		1,131,708		224,970		341,266		167,209		72,709		139,446		86,961		90,179		108,624		3,024,804		5,387,876
-Institutional clients		3,221,829		827,408		1,339,612		485,446		565,821		544,560		1,171,873		643,714		601,570		21,864,562		31,266,395
Total Portfolio, Gross		534,607,770		79,940,683		35,672,835		12,874,596		8,896,804		7,584,496		5,471,489		8,895,281		4,139,605		347,989,128		1,046,072,687

F-179

APPENDIX 7 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, RESTATED:

This appendix forms an integral part of the Enersis financial statements.

ASSETS	12/31/2012 (Restated) ThCh$		12/31/2012 (Issued) ThCh$		Change at 12/312012 ThCh$		1/1/2012 (Restated) ThCh$		1/1/2012 (Issued) ThCh$		Change at 1/1/2012 ThCh$
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents		815,832,061		857,380,018		(41,547,957)		1,187,684,209		1,219,921,268	(32,237,059)
Other current financial assets		194,500,798		194,500,798		-		939,220		939,220	-
Other current non-financial assets		103,376,711		105,919,767		(2,543,056)		69,479,673		72,466,312	(2,986,639)
Trade and other current receivables		846,791,111		869,204,566		(22,413,455)		950,007,713		977,602,388	(27,594,675)
Accounts receivable from related companies		47,570,282		33,028,911		14,541,371		61,912,486		35,282,592	26,629,894
Inventories		76,563,085		83,479,493		(6,916,408)		70,334,841		77,925,544	(7,590,703)
Current tax assets		205,554,882		211,004,880		(5,449,998)		138,365,618		141,827,684	(3,462,066)
Total current assets other than assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		2,290,188,930		2,354,518,433		(64,329,503)		2,478,723,760		2,525,965,008	(47,241,248)
Non-current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-	-
Non-current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-	-
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		2,290,188,930		2,354,518,433		(64,329,503)		2,478,723,760		2,525,965,008	(47,241,248)
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Other non-current financial assets		439,018,106		439,115,917		(97,811)		37,246,770		37,355,061	(108,291)
Other non-current non-financial assets		87,788,359		87,822,131		(33,772)		109,213,012		109,501,108	(288,096)
Non-current receivables		202,900,342		202,977,693		(77,351)		443,128,492		443,328,450	(199,958)
Non-current accounts receivable from related companies		-		-		-		-		-	-
Investments accounted for using the equity method		214,517,345		12,176,684		202,340,661		194,785,717		13,193,262	181,592,455
Intangible assets other than goodwill		1,202,002,511		1,203,135,574		(1,133,063)		1,466,680,979		1,467,398,214	(717,235)
Goodwill		1,391,673,952		1,399,876,589		(8,202,637)		1,468,307,108		1,476,404,126	(8,097,018)
Property, plant, and equipment		7,049,923,571		7,243,620,209		(193,696,638)		7,045,908,847		7,242,731,006	(196,822,159)
Investment property		46,922,970		46,922,970		-		38,055,889		38,055,889	-
Deferred tax assets		321,556,216		327,667,440		(6,111,224)		367,036,508		379,938,628	(12,902,120)
TOTAL DE NON-CURRENT ASSETS		10,956,303,372		10,963,315,207		(7,011,835)		11,170,363,322		11,207,905,744	(37,542,422)
TOTAL ASSETS		13,246,492,302		13,317,833,640		(71,341,338)		13,649,087,082		13,733,870,752	(84,783,670)

F-180

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	12/31/2012 (Restated) ThCh$		12/31/2012 (Issued) ThCh$		Change at 12/312012 ThCh$		1/1/2012 (Restated) ThCh$		1/1/2012 (Issued) ThCh$		Change at 1/1/2012 ThCh$
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other current financial liabilities		658,423,302		670,182,208		(11,758,906)		660,562,558		672,082,338	(11,519,780)
Trade and other current payables		1,194,851,750		1,213,259,735		(18,407,985)		1,213,388,313		1,235,064,459	(21,676,146)
Accounts payable to related companies		150,259,507		146,827,411		3,432,096		160,358,684		157,177,638	3,181,046
Other current provisions		89,730,702		91,130,695		(1,399,993)		99,189,386		99,702,654	(513,268)
Current tax liabilities		169,545,538		173,136,710		(3,591,172)		232,246,173		235,853,242	(3,607,069)
Other current non-financial liabilities		83,919,926		86,575,476		(2,655,550)		56,288,910		60,653,304	(4,364,394)
Total current liabilities other than those associated with current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		2,346,730,725		2,381,112,235		(34,381,510)		2,422,034,024		2,460,533,635	(38,499,611)
Liabilities associated with current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-	-
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES	2,346,730,725		2,381,112,235		(34,381,510)		2,422,034,024		2,460,533,635		(38,499,611)
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other non-current financial liabilities		2,928,119,869		2,928,119,869		-		3,271,355,293		3,271,355,293	-
Other non-current payables		14,257,438		14,257,438		-		14,304,607		14,304,607	-
Other long-term provisions		176,575,035		177,078,989		(503,954)		202,015,839		202,573,641	(557,802)
Deferred tax liabilities		501,127,697		519,026,046		(17,898,349)		482,260,262		508,438,255	(26,177,993)
Non-current provisions for employee benefits		256,161,368		265,067,889		(8,906,521)		269,353,075		277,526,013	(8,172,938)
Other non-current non-financial liabilities		65,313,125		69,402,596		(4,089,471)		96,722,791		102,985,451	(6,262,660)
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES	3,941,554,532		3,972,952,827		(31,398,295)		4,336,011,867		4,377,183,260		(41,171,393)
TOTAL LIABILITIES	6,288,285,257		6,354,065,062		(65,779,805)		6,758,045,891		6,837,716,895		(79,671,004)
EQUITY
Issued capital		2,824,882,835		2,824,882,835		-		2,824,882,835		2,824,882,835	-
Retained earnings		2,421,278,841		2,421,278,841		-		2,232,968,880		2,232,968,880	-
Share premium		158,759,648		158,759,648		-		158,759,648		158,759,648	-
Other reserves		(1,511,122,753)		(1,511,122,753)		-		(1,320,882,757)		(1,320,882,757)	-
Equity attributable to shareholders of Enersis		3,893,798,571		3,893,798,571		-		3,895,728,606		3,895,728,606	-
Non-controlling interests		3,064,408,474		3,069,970,007		(5,561,533)		2,995,312,585		3,000,425,251	(5,112,666)
TOTAL EQUITY	6,958,207,045		6,963,768,578		(5,561,533)		6,891,041,191		6,896,153,857		(5,112,666)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	13,246,492,302		13,317,833,640		(71,341,338)		13,649,087,082		13,733,870,752		(84,783,670)

F-181

STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Profit (loss)	2012 (Restated) ThCh$		2012 (Issued) ThCh$		Change in 2012 ThCh$		2011 (Restated) ThCh$		2011 (Issued) ThCh$		Change in 2011 ThCh$
Sales		6,182,123,698		6,260,309,229		(78,185,531)		6,107,142,811		6,254,252,089	(147,109,278)
Other operating income		313,829,750		317,358,085		(3,528,335)		279,457,083		280,628,255	(1,171,172)
Revenues		6,495,953,448		6,577,667,314		(81,713,866)		6,386,599,894		6,534,880,344	(148,280,450)
Raw materials and consumables used		(3,695,022,919)		(3,717,125,487)		22,102,568		(3,450,163,125)		(3,538,434,729)	88,271,604
Contribution Margin		2,800,930,529		2,860,541,827		(59,611,298)		2,936,436,769		2,996,445,615	(60,008,846)
Other work performed by the entity and capitalized		48,667,382		48,853,687		(186,305)		49,921,196		50,173,112	(251,916)
Employee benefits expenses		(409,179,836)		(416,345,140)		7,165,304		(371,753,777)		(378,552,126)	6,798,349
Depreciation and amortization expense		(434,483,734)		(442,854,723)		8,370,989		(416,864,931)		(424,900,036)	8,035,105
Reversal of impairment loss (impairment loss) recognized in the period’s profit or loss		(42,612,727)		(43,105,193)		492,466		(136,119,203)		(136,157,459)	38,256
Other expenses		(492,558,847)		(510,125,910)		17,567,063		(522,693,103)		(540,698,397)	18,005,294
Operating Income		1,470,762,767		1,496,964,548		(26,201,781)		1,538,926,951		1,566,310,709	(27,383,758)
Other gains (losses)		15,186,412		14,831,474		354,938		(4,731,186)		(4,814,294)	83,108
Financial income		232,129,980		264,709,235		(32,579,255)		194,545,840		233,612,869	(39,067,029)
Financial costs		(419,888,938)		(453,447,437)		33,558,499		(423,128,515)		(465,411,363)	42,282,848
Share of profit (loss) of associates accounted for using the equity method		30,381,936		9,845,902		20,536,034		26,891,233		8,465,904	18,425,329
Foreign currency exchange differences		(16,126,401)		(14,768,878)		(1,357,523)		20,124,044		20,305,690	(181,646)
Profit (loss) from indexed assets and liabilities		(12,756,868)		(12,681,628)		(75,240)		(25,206,927)		(25,092,203)	(114,724)
Net income before tax		1,299,688,888		1,305,453,216		(5,764,328)		1,327,421,440		1,333,377,312	(5,955,872)
Income tax		(406,675,920)		(411,891,234)		5,215,314		(455,469,317)		(460,836,692)	5,367,375
Net income from continuing operations		893,012,968		893,561,982		(549,014)		871,952,123		872,540,620	(588,497)
Net income from discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-	-
NET INCOME		893,012,968		893,561,982		(549,014)		871,952,123		872,540,620	(588,497)
Net income attributable to
Shareholders of Enersis		377,350,521		377,350,521		-		375,471,254		375,471,254	-
Non-controlling interests		515,662,447		516,211,461		(549,014)		496,480,869		497,069,366	(588,497)
NET INCOME		893,012,968		893,561,982		(549,014)		871,952,123		872,540,620	(588,497)
Basic earnings per share
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations		11.56		11.56		-		11.50		11.50	-
Basic earnings per share		11.56		11.56		-		11.50		11.50	-
Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations		11.56		11.56		-		11.50		11.50	-
Diluted earnings per share		11.56		11.56		-		11.50		11.50	-

F-182

	January-December						January-December
Statement of Direct Cash Flow	2012 (Restated) ThCh$		2012 (Issued) ThCh$		Change in 2012 ThCh$		2011 (Restated) ThCh$		2011 (Issued) ThCh$		Change in 2011 ThCh$
Cash flow from (used in) operating activities
Types of collections from operating activities
Collections from the sale of goods and services		7,421,957,070		7,496,002,995		(74,045,925)		7,554,155,043		7,725,639,255		(171,484,212)
Collections from royalties, payments, commissions, and other income from ordinary activities		93,605,931		92,758,277		847,654		86,290,041		86,290,041		-
Collections from premiums and services, annual payments, and other benefits from policies held		5,903,050		5,903,050		-		-				-
Other collections from operating activities		384,127,217		386,071,748		(1,944,531)		251,484,266		256,467,291		(4,983,025)
Types of payments
Payments to suppliers for goods and services		(3,899,057,207)		(3,934,574,455)		35,517,248		(3,804,072,531)		(3,942,239,405)		138,166,874
Payments to and on behalf of employees		(400,061,812)		(409,539,542)		9,477,730		(349,702,202)		(358,459,354)		8,757,152
Payments on premiums and services, annual payments, and other obligations from policies held		(8,066,513)		(9,397,983)		1,331,470		(5,627,373)		(5,742,211)		114,838
Other payments for operating activities		(1,351,575,914)		(1,352,330,115)		754,201		(1,544,218,673)		(1,545,840,676)		1,622,003
Income taxes reimbursed (paid)		(452,305,887)		(457,738,318)		5,432,431		(358,664,017)		(361,092,038)		2,428,021
Other inflows (outflows) of cash		(251,163,500)		(256,517,095)		5,353,595		(156,398,224)		(156,576,437)		178,213
Net cash flows from (used in) operating activities		1,543,362,435		1,560,638,562		(17,276,127)		1,673,246,330		1,698,446,466		(25,200,136)
Cash flows from (used in) investment activities
Cash flows from the loss of control of subsidiaries or other business		-		-		-		12,662,234		12,662,234		-
Cash flows used to obtain control of subsidiaries or other business		(7,140,000)		-		(7,140,000)		(4,058,192)		-		(4,058,192)
Loans to related companies		-		-		-		(1,326,000)		(25,500)		(1,300,500)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment		918,437		918,437		-		6,041,469		6,048,912		(7,443)
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment		(517,233,484)		(527,630,629)		10,397,145		(484,028,401)		(495,958,729)		11,930,328
Proceeds from the sale of intangible assets		-		-		-		8,965,592		8,965,592		-
Purchases of intangible assets		(187,197,935)		(187,490,636)		292,701		(187,551,511)		(187,864,119)		312,608
Proceeds from other long-term assets		-		-		-		-		-		-
Purchases of other long-term assets		(2,859,668)		(2,859,668)		-		(2,183,333)		(2,183,333)		-
Collections from related entities		2,600,730		-		2,600,730		-		-		-
Dividends received		7,539,711		7,539,711		-		4,025,233		4,025,233		-
Interest received		56,681,895		56,687,582		(5,687)		19,611,804		19,611,804		-
Other inflows (outflows) of cash		(674,255)		(674,255)		-		10,748,226		10,748,226		-
Net cash flows from (used in) investment activities		(842,136,080)		(848,280,969)		6,144,889		(616,459,117)		(623,335,918)		6,876,801
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities
Total proceeds from loans		501,199,355		508,817,790		(7,618,435)		643,919,707		646,273,100		(2,353,393)
Proceeds from long-term loans		400,797,521		400,797,521		-		525,077,859		525,077,859		-
Proceeds from short-term loans		100,401,834		108,020,269		(7,618,435)		118,841,848		121,195,241		(2,353,393)
Loans from related companies		-		-		-		18,257,300		9,128,650		9,128,650
Payments on borrowings		(645,675,778)		(651,209,149)		5,533,371		(617,735,935)		(629,404,409)		11,668,474
Payments on financial lease liabilities		(25,491,730)		(25,491,730)		-		(11,478,851)		(11,478,851)		-
Dividends paid		(547,081,888)		(547,081,888)		-		(648,107,205)		(648,107,205)		-
Interest paid		(253,478,855)		(254,327,622)		848,767		(245,683,421)		(248,096,873)		2,413,452
Other inflows (outflows) of cash		(41,745,935)		(42,791,188)		1,045,253		(14,511,368)		(9,743,963)		(4,767,405)
Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities		(1,012,274,831)		(1,012,083,787)		(191,044)		(875,339,773)		(891,429,551)		16,089,778
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents before effect of exchange rate changes		(311,048,476)		(299,726,194)		(11,322,282)		181,447,440		183,680,997		(2,233,557)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(60,803,672)		(62,815,056)		2,011,384		76,040,491		75,518,996		521,495
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(371,852,148)		(362,541,250)		(9,310,898)		257,487,931		259,199,993		(1,712,062)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1,187,684,209		1,219,921,268		(32,237,059)		930,196,278		961,355,037		(31,158,759)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		815,832,061		857,380,018		(41,547,957)		1,187,684,209		1,220,555,030		(32,870,821)

F-183

SCHEDULE I

Rule 5-04 of the Securities and Exchange Commission requires presentation of condensed financial statements of the registrant (parent company) when restricted net asset, defined as assets not to be transferred to the parent company in the form of loans, advance or cash dividends of the subsidiary without the consent of a third party, exceed of the 25% consolidated net assets of the parent and its subsidiaries.

Following are the Enersis separate statements of financial position as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012 and the related statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards.

ENERSIS S.A.

Separate Statement of Financial Position

At December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012

(In thousands of Chilean pesos - ThCh$)

ASSETS	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents		826,858,453		203,350,075	328,709,300
Other current financial assets		516,347,780		-	-
Other current non-financial assets		789,321		591,537	432,477
Trade and other current receivables		2,766,324		3,398,177	5,307,457
Accounts receivable from related companies		376,887,010		197,239,223	45,295,153
Inventories		4,835,163		4,315,433	5,651,622
Current tax assets		17,871,871		20,555,750	10,746,284
Total current assets other than assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		1,746,355,922		429,450,195	396,142,293
Non-current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		-		-	-
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		1,746,355,921		429,450,195	396,142,293
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Other non-current financial assets		34,867,362		27,045,746	20,793,960
Investments in subsidiaries and associates companies		3,531,731,285		2,407,743,084	2,407,743,084
Intangible assets other than goodwill		2,523,750		2,259,343	1,848,204
Property, plant and equipment, net		5,532,446		5,985,062	6,831,258
Deferred tax assets		45,694,767		49,529,306	39,818,448
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS		3,620,349,610		2,492,562,541	2,477,034,954
TOTAL ASSETS		5,366,705,532		2,922,012,736	2,873,177,247

F-184

ENERSIS S.A.

Separate Statement of Financial Position

At December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012

  (In thousands of Chilean pesos - ThCh$)

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	12-31-2013 ThCh$		12-31-2012 ThCh$		01-01-2012 ThCh$
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other current financial liabilities		319,822,107		12,771,891	12,336,371
Trade and other current payables		89,375,522		57,210,948	49,990,132
Accounts payable to related companies		124,190,739		70,185,939	79,076,032
Other current provisions		7,650,343		5,576,621	13,485,579
Current tax liabilities		46,010,216		1,028,454	302,633
Other current non-financial liabilities		183,803		494,441	341,616
Total current liabilities other than those associated with current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		587,232,730		147,268,294	155,532,363
Liabilities associated with current assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations		-		-	-
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		587,232,730		147,268,294	155,532,363
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other non-current financial liabilities		254,771,986		551,669,663	553,642,026
Deferred tax liabilities		-		1,601,425	1,833,765
Non-current provisions for employee benefits		7,271,017		5,877,316	5,359,699
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES		262,043,003		559,148,404	560,835,490
TOTAL LIABILITIES		849,275,733		706,416,698	716,367,853
EQUITY
Issued capital		5,669,280,724		2,824,882,835	2,824,882,835
Retained earnings		608,708,425		534,511,449	486,707,243
Share premium		158,759,648		158,759,648	158,759,648
Other reserves		(1,919,318,998)		(1,302,557,894)	(1,313,540,332)
TOTAL EQUITY		4,517,429,799		2,215,596,038	2,156,809,394
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY		5,366,705,531		2,922,012,736	2,873,177,247

F-185

ENERSIS S.A.

Separate Statement of Comprehensive Income

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

(In thousands of Chilean pesos - ThCh$)

	January - December
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	2013  ThCh$		2012  ThCh$		2011 ThCh$
Dividends from a subsidiaries and Associates		281,225,678		290,475,777	400,034,628
Other operating income		14,395,351		14,867,439	14,504,696
Total Revenues		295,621,029		305,343,216	414,539,324
Raw materials and consumable used		(16,174,205)		(15,745,496)	(14,798,705)
Contribution Margin		279,446,824		289,597,720	399,740,619
Employee benefits expense		(22,688,433)		(19,546,232)	(16,713,154)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(1,154,090)		(1,019,576)	(1,050,299)
Impairment loss recognized in the year’s profit or loss		-		-	(149,027,067)
Other miscellaneous operating expenses		(11,566,388)		(13,861,870)	(12,833,294)
Operating Income		244,037,913		255,170,042	220,116,805
Profit (Loss) on derecognition of available-for-sale financial assets		-		(5,850)	22,793,523
Financial cost		27,989,111		(19,504,727)	(29,348,484)
Foreign currency exchange differences		2,112,807		(5,722,112)	6,580,169
Profit (loss) for indexed assets and liabilities		(11,034,510)		(12,954,832)	(19,881,258)
Net Income Before Tax		263,105,321		216,982,521	200,260,755
Income Tax		(54,650,461)		19,690,401	470,914
Net Income from Continuing Operations		208,454,860		236,672,922	200,731,669
Net Income from discontinued operations		-		-	-
NET INCOME		208,454,860		236,672,922	200,731,669
Components of other comprehensive income, before taxes
Gains (losses) on cash flow hedge		849,555		13,036,981	15,532,787
Actuarial gain (loss) on defined benefit plans		(794,600)		(772,170)	(127,086)
Total components of other comprehensive income, before taxes		54,955		12,264,811	15,405,701
Income tax related to components of other comprehensive income
Income tax related to cash flow hedge		(169,910)		(2,054,542)	(2,640,574)
Income tax related to defined benefit plans		158,920		201,645	21,605
Total income tax		(10,990)		(1,852,897)	(2,618,969)
Total Other Comprehensive Income		43,965		10,411,914	12,786,732
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME		208,498,825		247,084,836	213,518,401

F-186

ENERSIS S.A.

Separate Statement of Changes in Equity

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

(In thousands of Chilean pesos - ThCh$)

Statement of Changes in Equity, Net	Issued capital		Share Premium		Changes in other reserves						Other reserves		Retained earnings		Total Equity
					Reserve of cash flow hedge		Reserve of actuarial gains or losses on defined benefit plans		Other miscellaneous reserves
Equity at beginning of period 01/01/2013		2,824,882,835		158,759,648		(4,313,195)				(1,298,244,698)		(1,302,557,893)		534,511,448		2,215,596,038
Changes in equity
Comprehensive income						679,645		(635,680)				43,965		208,454,860		208,498,825
Net income														208,454,860		208,454,860
Other comprehensive income						679,645		(635,680)				43,965				43,965
Comprehensive Income
Dividends														(273,024,349)		(273,024,349)
Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes		2,844,397,889						635,680		(617,440,750)		(616,805,070)		138,766,466		2,366,359,284
Total changes in equity		2,844,397,889				679,645		-		(617,440,750)		(616,761,105)		74,196,977		2,301,833,761
Equity at end of year 12/31/2013		5,669,280,724		158,759,648		(3,633,550)		-		(1,915,685,448)		(1,919,318,998)		608,708,425		4,517,429,799

Statement of Changes in Equity, Net	Issued capital		Share Premium		Changes in other reserves						Other reserves		Retained earnings		Total Equity
					Reserve of cash flow hedge		Reserve of actuarial gains or losses on defined benefit plans		Other miscellaneous reserves
Equity at beginning of period 01/01/2012		2,824,882,835		158,759,648		(15,427,433)		-		(1,298,112,899)		(1,313,540,332)		486,707,243		2,156,809,394
Changes in equity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Comprehensive income		-		-		10,982,439		(570,525)		-		10,411,914		236,672,922		247,084,836
Net income		-		-		-		-		-		-		236,672,922		236,672,922
Other comprehensive income		-		-		10,982,439		(570,525)		-		10,411,914		-		10,411,914
Comprehensive Income		-		-		-		-		-				-		-
Dividends		-		-		-		-		-				(188,298,192)		(188,298,192)
Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes		-		-		131,799		570,525		(131,799)		570,525		(570,525)		-
Total changes in equity		-		-		11,114,238		-		(131,799)		10,982,439		47,804,205		58,786,644
Equity at end of year 12/31/2012		2,824,882,835		158,759,648		(4,313,195)		-		(1,298,244,698)		(1,302,557,893)		534,511,448		2,215,596,038

Statement of Changes in Equity, Net	Issued capital		Share Premium		Changes in other reserves						Other reserves		Retained earnings		Total Equity
					Reserve of cash flow hedge		Reserve of actuarial gains or losses on defined benefit plans		Other miscellaneous reserves
Equity at beginning of period 01/01/2011		2,824,882,835		158,759,648		(28,319,646)		-		(1,298,112,899)		(1,326,432,545)		495,967,789		2,153,177,727
Changes in equity		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Comprehensive income		-		-		12,892,213		(105,481)		-		12,786,732		200,731,669		213,518,401
Net income		-		-		-		-		-		-		200,731,669		200,731,669
Other comprehensive income		-		-		12,892,213		(105,481)		-		12,786,732		-		12,786,732
Comprehensive Income		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Dividends		-		-		-		-		-		-		(209,886,734)		(209,886,734)
Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes		-		-		-		105,481		-		105,481		(105,481)		-
Total changes in equity		-		-		12,892,213		-		-		12,892,213		(9,260,546)		3,631,667
Equity at end of year 12/31/2011		2,824,882,835		158,759,648		(15,427,433)		-		(1,298,112,899)		(1,313,540,332)		486,707,243		2,156,809,394

F-187

ENERSIS S.A.

Separate Statement of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

(In thousands of Chilean pesos - ThCh$)

	2013		2012		2011
Statement of Direct Cash Flow	ThCh$		ThCh$		ThCh$
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities
Types of collections from operating activities
Collections from the sale of goods and services		16,351,766		15,480,170		24,558,500
Collections from royalties, payments, commissions, and other income from ordinary activities		27,414,839		20,845,453		11,677,458
Other collections from operating activities		29,273		575,444		153,937
Types of payments
Payments to suppliers for goods and services		(19,217,955)		(19,805,947)		(20,151,765)
Payments to and on behalf of employees		(20,103,997)		(16,660,790)		(15,353,879)
Other payments for operating activities		(8,598,358)		(8,861,433)		(21,265,185)
Income tax reimbursed (paid)		(7,976,110)		(2,931,311)		636,356
Other inflows (outflows) of cash		(3,649,202)		(7,033,011)		(10,749,578)
Net cash flows from (used in) operating activities		(15,749,744)		(18,391,425)		(30,494,156)
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities
Proceeds from the sale of Other Financial Assets		-		-		31,486,668
Other cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities		700,458,990		209,417,363		161,163,996
Proceeds from dividends received classified for investing purposes		322,783,054		287,779,731		374,143,660
Other collections from the sale of equity or debt instruments belonging to other entities		687,433,298		-		-
Other payments to acquire equity or debt instruments from other entities		(1,195,960,930)		-		-
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(1,090,529)		(1,266,889)		(700,846)
Payments from future, forward, option, and swap contracts		(2,141,464)		-		-
Loans to related companies		(795,881,487)		(375,042,775)		(2,067,881)
Interest received		53,358,478		18,136,817		9,826,441
Other investment disbursements		(3,733,546)		(7,849,414)		-
Net cash flows from (used in) investing activities		(234,774,136)		131,174,833		573,852,038
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities
Proceeds from share issuance		1,096,356,706		-		-
Proceeds from loans obtained		-		608,503		-
Proceeds from loans from related companies		38,654,300		108,382,598		-
Repayments of borrowings		(2,551,767)		(2,381,601)		(1,943,349)
Payments from loans to related companies		(35,350,048)		(118,364,087)		(7,072,402)
Dividend paid to shareholders		(187,969,872)		(186,207,746)		(242,669,579)
Interest paid		(23,807,987)		(25,089,047)		(25,659,530)
Other inflows (outflows) of cash		(11,960,381)		(12,217,090)		-
Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities		873,370,951		(235,268,470)		(277,344,860)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents before effect of exchange rate changes		622,847,071		(122,485,062)		266,013,022
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		661,305		(2,874,163)		-
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		623,508,376		(125,359,225)		266,013,022
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		203,350,075		328,709,300		62,696,278
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year		826,858,451		203,350,075		328,709,300

F-188

Additional information:

1. Basis of Presentation

Enersis S.A. (“the Parent”) is a holding company that conducts substantially all of its business operations through its subsidiaries. It is important to consider that for purposes of preparing separate financial statements under International Financial Reporting Standards, the Parent records its investments in subsidiaries and associates at its cost. Dividends received from a subsidiary and associate are recognized in profit or loss in the Parent’s separate financial statements when its right to receive such dividend is established. The information described bellow should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Enersis S.A. The basis of presentation and accounting principles used in the preparation of these separate financial statements are described in notes 2 and 3 of the consolidated financial statements except for notes 2.4, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.3, 2.5, 2.6 and 3.c which relates to the consolidation process.

2. Restricted Net Assets

Certain assets of the Parent’s subsidiaries totaling approximately ThCh$ 1,609,940,999 constitute restricted net assets, as there are contractual, legal or regulatory limitations on transferring such assets outside of the countries where the respective assets are located, or because they constitute undistributed earnings of affiliates of the Parent recorded under the equity method of accounting. As of December 31, 2013 all of the restricted net assets of the Parent’s subsidiaries currently exceed 25% of the consolidated net assets of the Parent and its subsidiaries, thus requiring this Schedule I, “Condensed Financial Information of the Registrant.”

F-189