Gables’ executive compensation program is intended to attract, retain and reward experienced, highly motivated executives who contribute to Gables’ ability to produce total returns to shareholders that exceed the NAREIT Apartment Index. The members of the Compensation Committee during 2004 were Dr. Miles, as Chair, Mr. McIntyre and Mr. Motta. In January 2005, Ms. Martin replaced Dr. Miles as Chair in connection with Dr. Miles’ resignation from the Board of Trustees. The Compensation Committee is responsible for implementing and developing Gables’ compensation policies and plans, including:
The fundamental principles of Gables executive compensation program during 2004 were as follows:
The executive compensation program was designed to motivate Gables’ executive officers and to better align the incentives of the executive officers with the interests of Gables’ shareholders.
As noted above, in administering the executive compensation program during 2004, the Compensation Committee determined that Gables would be best served if executive base salaries were maintained at amounts approximating median levels prevailing within the industry. The Compensation Committee, in its efforts to ensure the foregoing and maintain a competitive compensation structure, reviews on an annual basis data regarding the compensation structure of other REITs within Gables’ industry, and compares them with Gables’ existing compensation structure. Base salaries were increased by 4% effective July 1, 2002 to the following levels: $365,581 for Mr. Wheeler; $253,094 for Mr. Banks; and $253,094 for Mr. Hefley. Mr. Fitch was hired as Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer in August 2002 at a base salary of $280,000. These base salary levels were not increased in 2003. Base salaries were increased by approximately 4% effective July 1, 2004 to the following levels:
$380,200 for Mr. Wheeler; $264,550 for Mr. Banks; and $263,300 for Mr. Hefley. On July 1, 2004, the base salary for Mr. Fitch was increased to $325,000 in connection with his promotion to President.
Each of these executive officers has an employment agreement with Gables. See “Compensation of Trustees and Executive Officers – Employment and Severance Agreements.” While such employment agreements automatically renew for additional one-year terms unless a notice to the contrary effect is given by either party, the employment agreements do not provide for annual automatic increases in base salary.
Cash Bonuses
Under the Incentive Compensation Plan, cash bonuses for executive officers were determined based on an evaluation of each executive officer’s individual performance as judged against specific goals based on his own business function, as well as his role in discharging company-wide responsibilities and achieving company-wide goals. In determining an executive officer’s bonus, consideration was also given to the performance of companies in the industry sector in which Gables competes, specifically with respect to such executive officer’s equivalent business functions. Based on these evaluations, in January 2005, the Compensation Committee awarded the cash bonuses described in “Compensation of Trustees and Executive Officers – Summary Compensation Table.”
Equity-based Awards
The Compensation Committee continues to believe that the possibility to earn grants of common shares rather than cash serves as a motivating award and an effective tool for retaining experienced and talented executives in the long-term, and also serves to better align the incentives of management with the interests of shareholders. The Compensation Committee’s philosophy is that the long-term component of executives’ incentive compensation should be determined on the basis of the annual total return to Gables’ shareholders relative to the annual total return to shareholders for Gables’ competitors in its industry sector, as measured by the NAREIT Apartment Index. The Compensation Committee’s reliance on the NAREIT Apartment Index as the benchmark against which to judge Gables’ executives in terms of annual total return to shareholders is based in part on the fact that the NAREIT indices are widely used by the investment community to determine the relative performance, and therefore the compensation, of investment portfolio managers.
The precise methodology used by the Compensation Committee involves ranking the annual total return to Gables’ shareholders for a particular year against the statistical distribution of annual total returns for all companies included in the NAREIT Apartment Index for the particular year. The number of common shares awarded to executive officers is equal to the mid-point of the range of each executive officer’s potential number of common share awards if Gables’ performance is in line with the NAREIT Apartment Index. The executive officers will receive the maximum potential award level if Gables outperforms 75% of the companies in the index and will receive no award at all if 75% of the companies in the index outperform Gables. As a result, the number of common shares awarded will increase up toward the maximum potential award, if, and to the extent that, Gables’ performance is better than the index, and will decrease down toward no award at all if, and to the extent that, Gables’ performance is worse than the index. In calculating annual total returns, the Compensation Committee compares the ten-day year-end average total return of Gables to the ten-day year-end average total return for all companies in the NAREIT Apartment Index.
In January 2005, the Compensation Committee compared Gables’ total return to shareholders for 2004 (using the ten-day year-end average) of 9.5% to the total return to shareholders for all companies included in the NAREIT Apartment Index for 2004 (using the ten-day year-end average) of 33.7%. Based on this performance of Gables as compared to the index, factoring in the statistical distribution of the apartment REITs included in the index and applying the formula for calculating actual awards relative to the range of potential awards, executive officers were entitled to an award level of 0% of the maximum potential that the executive officers could have achieved. As a result, there were no common shares awarded to Messrs. Wheeler, Fitch, Banks and Hefley for 2004.
Compensation of Chief Executive Officer
In determining the compensation of Chris Wheeler, as Chief Executive Officer during 2004, the Compensation Committee applied the same philosophy and procedures as applied to the other executive officers. As discussed above, in accordance with its annual reviews of executive compensation, the Compensation Committee set the base salary for the Chief Executive Officer position at $365,581 effective July 1, 2002, which represented a 4% increase
19
over the previous salary level. This base salary level was not increased in 2003. On July 1, 2004, this base salary level was increased by 4% to $380,200.
In accordance with the incentive criteria established in the Incentive Compensation Plan described above, for his service as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer during 2004, the Committee awarded Mr. Wheeler a cash bonus of $361,190.
Policy with Respect to the $1 Million Deduction Limit
The SEC requires that this report comment upon Gables’ policy with respect to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which limits the deductibility on Gables’ tax return of compensation over $1 million to any of the named executive officers unless the compensation is paid pursuant to a plan which is performance-related, non-discretionary and has been approved by Gables’ shareholders. Gables did not pay any compensation during 2004 that would be subject to Section 162(m). Gables believes that, because it qualifies as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and therefore is not subject to federal income taxes on its income to the extent distributed, the payment of compensation that does not satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) will not generally affect Gables’ net income, although to the extent that compensation does not qualify for deduction under Section 162(m), a larger portion of shareholder distributions may be subject to federal income taxation as dividend income rather than return of capital. Gables does not believe that Section 162(m) will materially affect the taxability of shareholder distributions, although no assurance can be given in this regard due to the variety of factors that affect the tax position of each shareholder. For these reasons, the Compensation Committee’s compensation policy and practices are not directly governed by Section 162(m).
The foregoing report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Acts, except to the extent that Gables specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
Respectfully Submitted by the Compensation Committee:
Lauralee E. Martin, Chair
John W. McIntyre
James D. Motta
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of the Compensation Committee has served as an officer of Gables or has any other business relationship or affiliation with Gables, except his or her service as a trustee.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The members of the Audit Committee during 2004 were Mr. McIntyre, as Chair, Mr. Bromley, Ms. Martin and Mr. Stroup (effective with his nomination to the Board of Trustees in May 2004). Effective January 2005, in connection with the reconstitution of the committees resulting from Dr. Miles’ resignation from the Board of Trustees, the Audit Committee is comprised of Mr. Stroup, as Chair, Mr. Bromley and Mr. McIntyre. Each member satisfies the independence, financial literacy and expertise requirements contained in the listing standards of the NYSE and the independence requirements under the rules promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Trustees, which was revised effective March 4, 2004 in order to comply with the recently adopted NYSE requirements.
The Audit Committee, among other things, assists the Board of Trustees in fulfilling its oversight of (1) the integrity of Gables’ financial statements; (2) Gables’ compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (3) the qualifications, independence and performance of Gables’ independent auditors; and (4) the performance of Gables’ internal audit function. The Audit Committee has sole authority to appoint, retain, oversee and, when appropriate, terminate Gables’ independent auditors. The Audit Committee reviews Gables’ quarterly financial statements and internal accounting procedures and controls with management and reviews the scope and results of the audit engagement with the independent auditors.
20
In respect of the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004, the Audit Committee (1) reviewed and discussed the financial statements with Gables’ management and the independent auditors; (2) discussed with Gables’ independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by SAS No. 61, “Communication with Audit Committees”; and (3) discussed with the auditors their independence and received from the auditors the written disclosures and letter required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, “Independence Discussions with Audit Committees” regarding their independence. Based on the reviews and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Trustees that the audited financial statements be included in Gables’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, for filing with the SEC.
The foregoing report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Acts, except to the extent that Gables specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
Respectfully Submitted by the Audit Committee:
Chris C. Stroup, Chair
Marcus E. Bromley
John W. McIntyre
PRINCIPAL AND MANAGEMENT SHAREHOLDERS
Beneficial Ownership Table
On February 1, 2005, there were 29,557,350 common shares and 4,002,071 common units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“common units”) outstanding (other than the common units held by Gables Residential Trust). Each common unit is redeemable for one common share if Gables elects to issue common shares rather than pay cash upon such redemption.
The following table shows the amount of common shares and common units beneficially owned as of February 1, 2005 by:
• | | each trustee and named executive officer of Gables; |
• | | each person known by Gables to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding common shares of Gables; and |
• | | the trustees and executive officers of Gables as a group. |
The number of common shares “beneficially owned” by each shareholder is determined under rules issued by the SEC regarding the beneficial ownership of securities. This information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, beneficial ownership of common shares includes (i) any shares as to which the person or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power and (ii) any shares as to which the person or entity has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days after February 1, 2005, including any shares which could be purchased by the exercise of options at or within 60 days after February 1, 2005. For purposes of the following table, we have counted the beneficial ownership of common units as the beneficial ownership of the number of common shares for which such units may be redeemed if Gables elected to issue common shares rather than pay cash upon such redemption. Ownership of these units technically does not constitute beneficial ownership of common shares under the SEC’s Rule 13d-3 because, pursuant to the limited partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, the holders of the common units do not have the right to require Gables to exchange such common units for common shares.
21
Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes, all such interests are owned directly, and the indicated person or entity has sole voting and investment power.
Name and Business Address of Beneficial Owners
| | | | Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned
| | Percent of All Shares(1)
| | Percent of All Shares and Units (2)
|
---|
Trustees and Executive Officers
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Chris D. Wheeler(3) | | | | | 788,382 | | | | 2.6 | % | | | 2.3 | % |
David D. Fitch(4) | | | | | 18,840 | | | | * | | | | * | |
Marvin R. Banks, Jr.(5) | | | | | 252,436 | | | | * | | | | * | |
Douglas G. Chesnut(6) | | | | | 6,851 | | | | * | | | | * | |
Michael M. Hefley(7) | | | | | 194,257 | | | | * | | | | * | |
Marcus E. Bromley(8) | | | | | 168,277 | | | | * | | | | * | |
Lauralee E. Martin(9) | | | | | 35,509 | | | | * | | | | * | |
John W. McIntyre(10) | | | | | 37,519 | | | | * | | | | * | |
James D. Motta(11) | | | | | 10,250 | | | | * | | | | * | |
Chris C. Stroup(12) | | | | | 0 | | | | * | | | | * | |
All trustees and executive officers | | | | | 1,619,065 | | | | 5.3 | % | | | 4.8 | % |
as a group (14 persons) c/o Gables Residential Trust 777 Yamato Road, Suite 510 Boca Raton, Florida 33431
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5% Holders
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc.(13) 757 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017
| | | | | 4,809,757 | | | | 16.3 | % | | | 14.3 | % |
Deutsche Bank AG(14) Taunusanlage 12, D-60325 Frankfurt am Main Federal Republic of Germany
| | | | | 2,078,200 | | | | 7.0 | % | | | 6.2 | % |
Clarion CRA Securities, LP(15) 259 N. Radnor Chester Rd. Suite 205 Radnor, PA 19087
| | | | | 1,792,950 | | | | 6.1 | % | | | 5.3 | % |
Barclays Global Investors, NA(16) 45 Fremont St. San Francisco, CA 94105
| | | | | 1,679,561 | | | | 5.7 | % | | | 5.0 | % |
(1) | | Assumes that all common units held by the person are exchanged for common shares. The total number of shares outstanding used in calculating this percentage assumes that none of the common units held by other persons are exchanged for common shares. |
(2) | | Assumes that all common units held by the person are exchanged for common shares. In addition, the total number of shares used in calculating this percentage assumes that all of the common units outstanding held by all persons other than Gables are exchanged for common shares. |
(3) | | Includes 70,159 common shares (including 10,890 restricted shares), 561,923 common units, and options to purchase 156,300 common shares that are currently exercisable. |
22
(4) | | Includes 17,840 common shares (including 9,780 restricted shares) and 1,000 shares held in an IRA account in Mr. Fitch’s spouse’s name. |
(5) | | Includes 94,769 common shares (including 7,260 restricted shares), 42,667 common units, and options to purchase 115,000 common shares that are currently exercisable. |
(6) | | Includes 6,408 common shares (including 2,784 restricted shares) and 443 common shares held in the Gables Residential Trust Stock Fund investment option of Gables’ profit sharing plan. |
(7) | | Includes 45,939 common shares (including 7,260 restricted shares), 142,018 common units, and options to purchase 6,300 common shares that are currently exercisable. |
(8) | | Includes 9,148 common shares, 155,009 common units, 2,650 common shares owned by Mr. Bromley’s spouse, with respect to which common shares Mr. Bromley disclaims beneficial ownership, and 1,470 common shares owned by Mr. Bromley’s minor children, with respect to which common shares Mr. Bromley disclaims beneficial ownership. |
(9) | | Includes 15,509 common shares and options to purchase 20,000 common shares that are currently exercisable. |
(10) | | Includes 37,519 common shares. Does not include the approximate 10,543 common shares that have been credited to Mr. McIntyre’s deferral account pursuant to Gables’ deferred compensation program for non-employee trustees. |
(11) | | Includes 2,750 common shares and options to purchase 7,500 common shares that are currently exercisable. |
(12) | | Does not include the approximate 1,315 common shares that have been credited to Mr. Stroup’s deferral account pursuant to Gables’ deferred compensation program for non-employee trustees. |
(13) | | The indicated ownership is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005. The Schedule 13G indicates that this entity has sole voting power with respect to 4,753,700 of the shares reported and has sole dispositive power with respect to 4,806,500 of the shares reported. |
(14) | | The indicated ownership is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 8, 2005. |
(15) | | The indicated ownership is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on March 2, 2005. The Schedule 13G indicates that this entity has sole voting power with respect to 1,720,450 of the shares reported and has sole dispositive power with respect to all of the shares reported. |
(16) | | The indicated ownership is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005. The Schedule 13G indicates that this entity has sole voting power with respect to 1,590,517 of the shares reported and has sole dispositive power with respect to all of the shares reported. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires Gables’ executive officers and trustees, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of Gables’ equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. Officers, trustees and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish Gables with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To Gables’ knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to Gables and written representations that no other reports were required during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to Gables’ executive officers, trustees and greater than 10% beneficial owners were satisfied, except that Mr. Chesnut inadvertently failed to file a Form 4 Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership of Securities, relating to the acquisition of 728 common shares, on a timely basis.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Certain Business Relationships and Transactions with Management
From time to time, Gables associates travel on an airplane operated by a limited liability company (“LLC”) which is 100% owned by Mr. Wheeler. During 2004, Gables paid fees of approximately $138,465 to the LLC in connection with business travel by Mr. Wheeler and other Gables associates. The fees paid are equal to (i) 100% of the fare for flights that Mr. Wheeler would have been eligible for in accordance with Gables’ travel policy for
23
| | executive officers and (ii) 50% of a full coach fare for any other passengers traveling with him for business. The Audit Committee has reviewed this arrangement and determined that the fees paid to the LLC are reasonable. |
Mr. McIntyre is renting an apartment home in Atlanta from Gables for use as his primary residence. During 2004, Mr. McIntyre paid rent for the apartment home and related storage space to Gables of approximately $60,200. The rent charged Mr. McIntyre is based on an arm’s-length negotiation that transpired upon the execution of the related lease. The Audit Committee has reviewed this arrangement and determined that the rent paid to Gables is reasonable.
No executive officers are indebted to Gables as a result of Company loans.
OTHER MATTERS
Independent Auditors
The accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte & Touche”) has served as Gables’ independent auditor since the fiscal year 2002. A representative of Deloitte & Touche will be present at the annual meeting, will be given the opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Gables incurred the following fees for professional services rendered by its independent auditor, Deloitte & Touche, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:
| | | | 2004
| | 2003
|
---|
Audit fees (a) | | | | $ | 676,552 | | | $ | 343,400 | |
Audit-related fees (b) | | | | | 129,400 | | | | 121,000 | |
Total audit and audit-related fees | | | | | 805,952 | | | | 464,400 | |
Tax fees (c) | | | | | 225,375 | | | | 192,325 | |
All other fees (d), (e) | | | | | 2,250 | | | | 34,500 | |
Total fees | | | | $ | 1,033,577 | | | $ | 691,225 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(a)Detail of audit fees:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Annual audits and quarterly reviews of financial statements | | | | $ | 269,000 | | | $ | 224,000 | |
Audit of internal controls over financial reporting | | | | | 400,000 | | | | 0 | |
Comfort letters, consents, and other services related to SEC filings and related matters | | | | | 7,552 | | | | 119,400 | |
Total audit fees | | | | $ | 676,552 | | | $ | 343,400 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(b)Detail of audit-related fees:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Unconsolidated joint venture annual audits (f) | | | | $ | 100,750 | | | $ | 79,875 | |
Employee benefit plan audits | | | | | 17,400 | | | | 16,000 | |
Subsidiary stand-alone audits | | | | | 11,250 | | | | 13,125 | |
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Section 404 advisory services | | | | | 0 | | | | 12,000 | |
Total audit-related fees | | | | $ | 129,400 | | | $ | 121,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(c)Detail of tax fees:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax compliance services | | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 128,800 | |
Tax advisory services (e) | | | | | 70,125 | | | | 41,275 | |
Unconsolidated joint venture tax compliance services (f) | | | | | 20,250 | | | | 22,250 | |
Total tax fees | | | | $ | 225,375 | | | $ | 192,325 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(d)Represents fees for real estate tax consulting services.
| | | | | | | | | | |
| (e)Percentage of tax advisory services fees and all other fees:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax advisory services fees and all other fees | | | | $ | 72,375 | | | $ | 75,775 | |
Audit and audit-related fees and tax compliance services fees | | | | | 961,202 | | | | 615,450 | |
Percentage | | | | | 7.5 | % | | | 12.3 | % |
(f) | | Such fees are paid by the unconsolidated joint ventures. |
24
In considering the nature of the services provided by the independent auditor, the Audit Committee determined that such services are compatible with the provision of independent audit services. The Audit Committee discussed these services with the independent auditor and Gables’ management to determine that they are permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the SEC to implement the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Under its charter, the Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit and non-audit services to be provided by our independent auditor unless an exception to such pre-approval exists under the Exchange Act or the rules of the SEC. Each year, the Audit Committee approves the retention of the independent auditor to audit Gables’ financial statements, including the associated fee. At this time, the Audit Committee evaluates other known potential engagements of the independent auditor, including the scope of audit-related services, tax services and other services proposed to be performed and the proposed fees, and approves or rejects each service, taking into account whether the services are permissible under applicable law and the possible impact of each non-audit service on the independent auditor’s independence from management. At each subsequent committee meeting, the Audit Committee receives updates on the services actually provided by the independent auditor and the fees associated therewith, and management may present additional services for approval at that time. The Audit Committee has delegated to any one of the committee members the authority to evaluate and approve engagements on behalf of the Audit Committee in the event that a need arises for pre-approval between committee meetings. If an Audit Committee member so approves any such engagements, such member will report that approval to the full committee at the next committee meeting.
Since the May 6, 2003 effective date of the SEC rules stating that an auditor is not independent of an audit client unless the services it provides to the client are appropriately approved, each new engagement of Deloitte & Touche was approved in advance by the Audit Committee.
Expenses of Solicitation
The cost of solicitation of proxies will be borne by Gables. In an effort to have as large a representation at the meeting as possible, special solicitation of proxies may, in certain instances, be made personally or by telephone, telegraph or mail by one or more employees of Gables. Gables may also reimburse brokers, banks, nominees and other fiduciaries for postage and reasonable clerical expenses of forwarding the proxy material to their principals who are beneficial owners of Gables’ common shares.
Shareholder Proposals
Any shareholder proposals submitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 and intended to be presented at Gables’ 2006 annual meeting of shareholders must be received in writing at Gables’ principal executive offices on or before December 2, 2005 to be eligible for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy to be distributed by the Board of Trustees in connection with such meeting. Such proposals must also comply with the requirements as to form and substance established by the SEC if such proposals are to be included in Gables’ proxy statement and form of proxy.
Any shareholder proposals intended to be presented at Gables’ 2006 annual meeting, other than a shareholder proposal submitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8, must be received in writing at Gables’ principal executive offices no later than March 3, 2006 nor prior to November 18, 2005, together with all supporting documentation required by Gables’ bylaws, and such shareholder or his, her or its representative must be present at the 2006 annual meeting of shareholders. Proxies solicited by the Board of Trustees will confer discretionary voting authority with respect to these proposals, subject to SEC rules governing the exercise of this authority.
25
1276-PS-05
GABLES RESIDENTIAL TRUST
C/O EQUISERVE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
P.O. BOX 8694
EDISON, NJ 08818-8694
Gables Residential Trust
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Tuesday, May 17, 2005
Your vote is important. Please vote immediately.
| | | | |
Vote-by-Internet
Log on to the Internet and go to http://www.eproxyvote.com/gbp | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/334d2/334d25c93960ea1a3cc3455d4e1ff911b0e927a2" alt="(GRAPHIC)" | OR | Vote-by-Telephone
Call toll-free 1-877-PRX-VOTE (1-877-779-8683) | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26591/265918fe13578639ef8cb3e23af13f7afd6e71f6" alt="(GRAPHIC)" |
If you vote over the Internet or by telephone, please do not mail your card.
| | |
| DETACH HERE IF YOU ARE RETURNING YOUR PROXY CARD BY MAIL | ZGRD91 |
| | | | | | |
x | Please mark votes as in this example. | | | | | 1276 |
| | | | |
| | | | |
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. If no direction is otherwise made, the undersigned’s common shares will be voted “FOR ALL NOMINEES” on proposal 1. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
The Board of Trustees recommends a vote “FOR ALL NOMINEES” on proposal 1.
| | | | | | | | | |
1. | To elect three Class II Trustees to hold office until the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Class II Nominees:(01) David D. Fitch, (02) John W. McIntyre, (03) Chris D. Wheeler | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | FOR ALL NOMINEES | | | | WITHHELD FROM ALL NOMINEES | | |
| | | | |
| | | FOR ALL NOMINEES EXCEPT AS NOTED ABOVE |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
2. | To consider and act upon any matters incidental to the foregoing or any other matters which may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof. |
| | |
MARK HERE FOR ADDRESS CHANGE AND NOTE AT LEFT | |
| | |
For joint accounts each owner should sign. Executors, administrators, trustees, corporate officers and others acting in a representative capacity should give full title or authority. |
| | | | | | | |
Signature: | | Date: | | Signature: | | Date: | |
Dear Shareholder:
Please take note of the important information enclosed with this proxy.
Your vote is important and you are encouraged to exercise your right to vote your shares.
Please mark the boxes on the reverse side of this proxy card to indicate how your shares will be voted. You need not mark any boxes if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Trustees’ recommendations. The proxies cannot vote your preference unless you sign, date and return this card.
Alternatively, you can vote by proxy over the Internet or by telephone. See the reverse side for instructions.
Sincerely,
Gables Residential Trust
PROXY
Annual Meeting of Shareholders of
GABLES RESIDENTIAL TRUST
777 Yamato Road, Suite 510, Boca Raton, FL 33431
Proxy for Common Shares
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
The undersigned hereby appoints Chris D. Wheeler, David D. Fitch and Marvin R. Banks, Jr., and each of them, as proxies with full power of substitution to represent and vote, for and on behalf of the undersigned, all common shares of beneficial interest which the undersigned would be entitled to vote, if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Gables Residential Trust, to be held at the Vinings Club located in the office building of the Company’s Atlanta corporate offices at 2859 Paces Ferry Road, Atlanta, Georgia, 30339 on Tuesday, May 17, 2005 at 9:00 a.m. local time, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. The undersigned hereby revokes any proxy previously given in connection with such meeting and acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement and the 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders.
| | |
SEE REVERSE SIDE | CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE | SEE REVERSE SIDE |