| | |
EXPERIENCE | | Greenwich Street Series Fund Annual Report
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio
Equity Index Portfolio
Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund
Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund |
ANNUAL REPORT
INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED • NO BANK GUARANTEE • MAY LOSE VALUE
| |
| Greenwich Street Series Fund |
| |
| Annual Report • December 31, 2005 |
| | | |
Letter from the Chairman | | I |
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio: | | |
| Manager Overview | | 1 |
| Fund at a Glance | | 9 |
| Fund Performance | | 10 |
| Historical Performance | | 11 |
Equity Index Portfolio: | | |
| Manager Overview | | 12 |
| Fund at a Glance | | 15 |
| Fund Performance | | 16 |
| Historical Performance | | 17 |
Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund: | | |
| Manager Overview | | 18 |
| Fund at a Glance | | 21 |
| Fund Performance | | 22 |
| Historical Performance | | 23 |
Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund: | | |
| Manager Overview | | 24 |
| Fund at a Glance | | 27 |
| Fund Performance | | 28 |
| Historical Performance | | 29 |
Fund Expenses | | 30 |
Schedules of Investments | | 32 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities | | 76 |
Statements of Operations | | 77 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | | 78 |
Financial Highlights | | 82 |
Notes to Financial Statements | | 88 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | 105 |
Board Approval of Management and Subadvisory Agreements | | 106 |
Additional Information | | 117 |
Additional Shareholder Information | | 123 |
Important Tax Information | | 125 |
| |
| Under a licensing agreement between Citigroup and Legg Mason, the names of funds, the names of any classes of shares of funds, and the names of investment advisers of funds, as well as all logos, trademarks and service marks related to Citigroup or any of its affiliates (“Citi Marks”) are licensed for use by Legg Mason. Citi Marks include, but are not limited to, “Smith Barney,” “Salomon Brothers,” “Citi” and “Citigroup Asset Management”. Legg Mason and its affiliates, as well as the Funds’ investment adviser, are not affiliated with Citigroup. |
|
| All Citi Marks are owned by Citigroup, and are licensed for use until no later than one year after the date of the licensing agreement. |
![(Gerken photo)](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y1699902.gif)
R. Jay Gerken, CFA
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
| |
| Dear Shareholder, |
|
| Despite numerous obstacles, including rising short-term interest rates, surging oil prices, a destructive hurricane season, and geopolitical issues, the U.S. economy continued to expand at a healthy pace during the reporting period. After a 3.8% advance in the first quarter of 2005, gross domestic product (“GDP”)i growth was 3.3% during the second quarter and 4.1% in the third quarter. While fourth quarter figures have not yet been released, another slight gain is anticipated. |
| |
| Given the strength of the economy and inflationary pressures, the Federal Reserve Board (“Fed”)ii continued to raise interest rates throughout the period. After raising rates five times from June 2004 through December 2004, the Fed increased its target for the federal funds rateiii in 0.25% increments eight additional times over the reporting period. This represents the longest sustained Fed tightening cycle since the 1970s. All told, the Fed’s thirteen rate hikes have brought the target for the federal funds rate from 1.00% to 4.25%. After the end of the Funds’ reporting period, at its January meeting, the Fed once again raised its target for the federal funds rate by 0.25% to 4.50%. |
| For the one-year period ended December 31, 2005, the U.S. stock market generated positive results, with the S&P 500 Indexiv returning 4.91%. While corporate profits remained strong during the year, they were often overshadowed by rising interest rates and higher oil prices. |
| Looking at the fiscal year as a whole, mid-cap stocks outperformed their large- and small-cap counterparts, with the Russell Midcapv, Russell 1000vi, and Russell 2000vii Indexes returning 12.65%, 6.27%, and 4.55%, respectively. From an investment style perspective, value stocks outperformed growth stocks for the sixth consecutive calendar year, with the Russell 3000 Valueviii and Russell 3000 Growthix Indexes returning 6.85% and 5.17%, respectively, in 2005. |
Greenwich Street Series Fund I
| |
| Within this environment, the Funds performed as follows:1 |
| |
| Performance Snapshot as of December 31, 2005 (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | 6 Months | | 12 Months |
|
|
|
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio | | | 0.61% | | | | 2.56% | |
|
Lehman Brothers U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | | | -0.08% | | | | 2.43% | |
|
Lipper Variable General Bond Funds Category Average | | | 0.64% | | | | 2.03% | |
|
Equity Index Portfolio — Class I Shares | | | 5.56% | | | | 4.52% | |
|
Equity Index Portfolio — Class II Shares | | | 5.42% | | | | 4.25% | |
|
S&P 500 Index | | | 5.76% | | | | 4.91% | |
|
Lipper Variable S&P 500 Index Objective Funds Category Average | | | 5.56% | | | | 4.52% | |
|
Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund | | | 5.56% | | | | 3.63% | |
|
S&P 500 Index | | | 5.76% | | | | 4.91% | |
|
Russell 1000 Index | | | 6.15% | | | | 6.27% | |
|
Lipper Variable Large-Cap Core Funds Category Average | | | 6.56% | | | | 5.77% | |
|
Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund — Class I Shares | | | 12.92% | | | | 9.89% | |
|
Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund — Class II Shares | | | 12.75% | | | | 9.64% | |
|
Russell 3000 Growth Index | | | 7.19% | | | | 5.17% | |
|
Lipper Variable Multi-Cap Growth Funds Category Average | | | 11.23% | | | | 10.80% | |
|
| | |
| The performance shown represents past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results and current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown above. Principal value and investment returns will fluctuate and investors’ shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month-end, please visit our website at www.citigroupam.com. | |
Fund returns assume the reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value and the deduction of all Fund expenses.
Lipper, Inc. is a major independent mutual-fund tracking organization. Returns are based on the period ended December 31, 2005 and include the reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any. Returns were calculated among the 50 funds for the 6-month period and among the 50 funds for the 12-month period in the variable general bond funds category. Returns were calculated among the 55 funds for the 6-month period and among the 55 funds for the 12-month period in the variable S&P 500 Index objective funds category. Returns were calculated among the 223 funds for the 6-month period and among the 220 funds for the 12-month period in the variable large-cap core funds category. Returns were calculated among the 119 funds for the 6-month period and among the 115 funds for the 12-month period in the variable multi-cap growth funds category.
| |
1 | The Funds are underlying investment options of various variable annuity and variable life insurance products. The Funds’ performance returns do not reflect the deduction of initial sales charges and expenses imposed in connection with investing in variable annuity or variable life insurance contracts, such as administrative fees, account charges, and surrender charges, which, if reflected, would reduce the performance of the Funds. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
II Greenwich Street Series Fund
| |
| Please read on for a more detailed look at prevailing economic and market conditions during the Funds’ fiscal year and to learn how these conditions have affected Fund performance. |
| |
| Special Shareholder Notices |
| On or about May 1, 2006, the Greenwich Street Series Fund will be renamed Legg Mason Partners Variable Portfolios II. |
|
| Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio |
| On December 1, 2005, Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”) completed the sale of substantially all of its asset management business, Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”), to Legg Mason, Inc. (“Legg Mason”). As a result, the Fund’s investment adviser (the “Manager”), previously an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup, has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Legg Mason. Completion of the sale caused the Fund’s existing investment advisory contract and sub-advisory contract to terminate. The Fund’s shareholders previously approved a new investment management contract between the Fund and the Manager and a new sub-advisory contract, which became effective on December 1, 2005. |
|
| Equity Index Portfolio |
| On December 1, 2005, Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”) completed the sale of substantially all of its asset management business, Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”), to Legg Mason, Inc. (“Legg Mason”). As a result, the Fund’s investment adviser (the “Manager”), previously an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup, has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Legg Mason. Completion of the sale caused the Fund’s existing investment advisory contract to terminate. The Fund’s shareholders previously approved a new investment management contract between the Fund and the Manager, which became effective on December 1, 2005. |
|
| Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund |
| On December 1, 2005, Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”) completed the sale of substantially all of its asset management business, Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”), to Legg Mason, Inc. (“Legg Mason”). As a result, the Fund’s investment adviser (the “Manager”), previously an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup, has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Legg Mason. Completion of the sale caused the Fund’s existing investment advisory contract to terminate. The Fund’s |
Greenwich Street Series Fund III
| |
| shareholders previously approved a new investment management contract between the Fund and the Manager, which became effective on December 1, 2005. |
|
| Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund |
| On December 1, 2005, Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”) completed the sale of substantially all of its asset management business, Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”), to Legg Mason, Inc. (“Legg Mason”). As a result, the Fund’s investment adviser (the “Manager”), previously an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup, has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Legg Mason. Completion of the sale caused the Fund’s existing investment advisory contract to terminate. The Fund’s shareholders previously approved a new investment management contract between the Fund and the Manager, which became effective on December 1, 2005. |
|
| Information About Your Funds |
| As you may be aware, several issues in the mutual fund industry have recently come under the scrutiny of federal and state regulators. The Funds’ Managers and Adviser and some of its affiliates have received requests for information from various government regulators regarding market timing, late trading, fees, and other mutual fund issues in connection with various investigations. The regulators appear to be examining, among other things, the Funds’ response to market timing and shareholder exchange activity, including compliance with prospectus disclosure related to these subjects. The Funds have been informed that the Managers and Adviser and its affiliates are responding to those information requests, but are not in a position to predict the outcome of these requests and investigations. |
| |
| Important information concerning the Funds and their Managers and Adviser with regard to recent regulatory developments is contained in the Notes to Financial Statements included in this report. |
IV Greenwich Street Series Fund
| |
| As always, thank you for your confidence in our stewardship of your assets. We look forward to helping you continue to meet your financial goals. |
Sincerely,
![-s- R. Jay Gerken](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y1709609.gif)
R. Jay Gerken, CFA
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
February 2, 2006
All index performance reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index.
| | |
i | | Gross domestic product is a market value of goods and services produced by labor and property in a given country. |
ii | | The Federal Reserve Board is responsible for the formulation of a policy designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices, and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments. |
iii | | The federal funds rate is the interest rate that banks with excess reserves at a Federal Reserve district bank charge other banks that need overnight loans. |
iv | | The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of 500 stocks that is generally representative of the performance of larger companies in the U.S. |
v | | The Russell Midcap Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest companies in the Russell 1000 Index whose average market capitalization was approximately $4.7 billion as of 6/24/05. |
vi | | The Russell 1000 Index measures the performance of the 1,000 largest companies in the Russell 3000 Index, which represents approximately 92% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index. |
vii | | The Russell 2000 Index measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000 Index, which represents approximately 8% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index. |
viii | | The Russell 3000 Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 3000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. (A price-to-book ratio is the price of a stock compared to the difference between a company’s assets and liabilities.) |
ix | | The Russell 3000 Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 3000 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. |
Greenwich Street Series Fund V
(This page intentionally left blank.)
Manager Overview
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio
Special Shareholder Notices
Effective October 1, 2005, the administration fee which is calculated daily and payable monthly, was reduced from 0.20% of the Fund’s average daily net assets to a fee calculated in accordance with the following breakpoint schedule:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Funds’ Fee Rate | | Advisory | | Administration | | |
Average Daily Net Assets | | Fee Rate | | Fee Rate | | Total |
|
|
|
First $1 billion | | | 0.450% | | | | 0.200% | | | | 0.650% | |
Next $1 billion | | | 0.450% | | | | 0.175% | | | | 0.625% | |
Next $3 billion | | | 0.450% | | | | 0.150% | | | | 0.600% | |
Next $5 billion | | | 0.450% | | | | 0.125% | | | | 0.575% | |
Over $10 billion | | | 0.450% | | | | 0.100% | | | | 0.550% | |
|
Effective February 1, 2006, Detlev Schlichter and Andres Sanchez-Balcazar, investment officers of Citigroup Asset Management Limited (the “sub-adviser”), the sub-adviser for investments in non-U.S. dollar denominated securities of non-U.S. issuers and currency transactions, assumed portfolio management responsibility for the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio’s investments in these areas.
Mr. Schlichter and Mr. Sanchez-Balcazar are each a portfolio manager of Western Asset Management Company Limited (“Western Asset”), which, like the sub-adviser and Smith Barney Fund Management LLC, the Fund’s investment manager, is a subsidiary of Legg Mason, Inc. Mr. Schlichter joined Western Asset in 2001 and has 16 years of investment experience. Mr. Sanchez-Balcazar joined Western Asset in 2005 and has nine years of investment experience.
Effective February 10, 2006, Smith Barney Fund Management LLC (the “manager”), the Fund’s investment manager has appointed the following individuals as portfolio managers of the Fund: S. Kenneth Leech, Stephen A. Walsh, Carl L. Eichstaedt, Edward A. Moody and Mark Lindbloom.
Each of the new portfolio managers is a portfolio manager of Western Asset Management Company (“Western Asset”), which, like the manager, is a subsidiary of Legg Mason, Inc.
The Fund will be managed by a team of portfolio managers, sector specialists and other investment professionals. The portfolio managers’ focus is on portfolio structure, including sector allocation, duration weighting and term structure decisions.
Mr. Leech, Mr Walsh and Mr. Eichstaedt have been employed as portfolio managers for Western Asset for the past five years. Mr. Lindbloom joined Western Asset in 2006.
On or about May 1, 2006, the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio will be renamed the Legg Mason Partners Variable Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 1
| |
Q. | What were the overall market conditions during the Fund’s reporting period? |
A. Due to the Fund’s allocations across investment grade, high yield and emerging markets debt, please find three separate market overviews for the period included below.
Investment Grade Market Review
During the 12 months ended December 31, 2005, the markets were primarily driven by Federal Reserve Board (“Fed”)i activity, employment and inflation data and rising energy costs, exacerbated by the devastating impact of Hurricane Katrina on the U.S. Gulf Coast. The Fed’s eight “measured” 25-basis-pointii hikes during the period brought the federal fundsiii rate from 2.25% to 4.25% by period end. These measured, consecutive rate hikes exerted upward pressure on short-term bond yields, driving 2-year yields up about 134 basis points during the 12 months. However, in what Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan termed a “conundrum,” yields on the long bond stayed low during the period, declining 29 basis points over the 12 months. This sharp rise in short yields and decline in longer yields resulted in the extensive yield curve flattening seen throughout the period and, near year end, a brief yield curve inversion as 2-year U.S. Treasury yields broke above 10-year yields on stronger-than-expected housing starts.
As the market fully expected each 25-basis-point hike in the federal funds rate during the period — thanks to the Fed’s well-telegraphed intentions to raise rates at a measured pace — investors spent much of the period dissecting language from the Fed for clues on its assessment of the U.S. economy and the pace of rate hikes. The Fed reiterated throughout much of the year that it would increase rates “at a pace that is likely to be measured,” noting that core inflation remained low through the year and long-term inflation expectations were “contained”. However, higher energy costs, exacerbated by the supply disruption following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, augmented already building inflationary pressure. Although the Fed maintained its “measured” language until the very end of the quarter due to continued strong economic growth and manageable inflation, in an important departure from previous accompanying statements, the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”)iv removed its characterization of monetary policy as “accommodative” in its December statement, as well as the signal phrase “at a pace that is likely to be measured”, a key indicator of future rate hikes. The overall tone of the December statement also indicated that monetary policy decisions will become more data dependent as the Fed shifts from its focus on reaching neutral to limiting pricing pressures. The nomination of Ben Bernanke in October as Fed Chairman, Alan Greenspan’s replacement also affected markets, leaving open the question of future policy direction, as Mr. Bernanke’s specific focus and leadership skills are, in part, unknown.
Economic growth remained remarkably resilient during the annual period, particularly in light of the volatility seen in employment indicators and mixed industrial production, retail sales and consumer sentiment during Spring 2005 and in the aftermath of Fall 2005’s Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Although the pace of improvement remained uneven month to month, the U.S. labor market trended broadly positive during the annual period, continuing the upswing in employment that began in early 2004. Unemployment fell through the majority of the period, declining from 5.4% in December 2004 to 4.9% in
2 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
December 2005. While September 2005 saw a 0.2% month-over-month uptick in unemployment to 5.1% as the dislocation in the Gulf region flowed through, the unemployment rate shifted back down the fourth quarter. An exceedingly strong housing market also underlined economic growth during the year, continuing its upward charge through the period despite some softening by year end.
Industrial production and retail sales remained broadly positive through most of the period, despite the volatility in the auto sector as General Motors and Ford were successively downgraded by three major statistical credit rating agencies to below investment grade in Spring 2005. While auto sales dragged headline retail numbers by period end, as reductions in auto production hit the market and the highly successful automotive dealer incentive packages offered through the summer came to an end, overall retail sales (ex-autos) remained reasonably stable. Industrial production declined in September on the impact of the hurricanes but rebounded sharply in October, resuming the strong upswing seen through the majority of the annual period. Consumer confidence, which plummeted through the Fall, ended the year up slightly at 103.6 versus December 2004’s 102.3 reading as gasoline prices fell in the fourth quarter.
Despite the resilience of the U.S. economy during the period, slowing global growth, broadly rising inflation and higher oil prices undoubtedly restrained economic activity during the 12 months. U.S. gross domestic product (“GDP”)v growth declined year-over-year to 3.8% growth in first quarter 2005 (from first quarter 2004’s 4.5% pace) and 3.4% growth in second quarter 2005 (from second quarter 2004’s 3.5%). While economic growth rebounded into the third quarter, gaining 4.1% on an annualized basis, the recovery was at least partially fueled by the massive fiscal stimulus injected into the Gulf region in the wake of the hurricanes. Therefore, although growth remained strong throughout the period, fears of potential slowing, combined with increasing inflation, drove markets. Oil prices, which breached $70 per barrel in late August before drifting back down to the mid-$60s, also cast a pall on growth and consumer spending expectations.
While inflationary pressures from sustained high commodity prices began to creep into the economy, particularly near the end of the year, continued strong growth and limited wage pressures kept long-term inflation expectations relatively “contained” through 2005. Core inflation rates, in particular, remained at moderate levels, with core Consumer Price Index (“CPI”)vi inflation consistently registering below expectations through early Fall despite growing inflationary pressure. Inflation fears tapered off slightly during the last two months of the quarter as energy costs came off their September highs, with headline inflation even surprising on the downside in December. However, despite the apparently moderate pace of inflation through 2005, the Fed remained extremely vigilant, as some inflation pressures began to seep into producer prices and U.S. economic growth continued at its surprisingly strong pace. Consistently high energy prices also began to push up core CPI inflation by December end, stopping its downward month-to-month drift to end the year with a 0.2% month-over-month increase in December, near the upper end of the Fed’s comfort range.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 3
U.S. High Yield Market Review
The high yield market returned 2.08% for the calendar year ending December 31, 2005, as represented by the Citigroup High Yield Market Index.vii Although high yield debt markets ended 2004 on a positive note after an extended end-of-year rally, markets turned generally down through Spring 2005 as rising oil prices, weak equity markets and isolated hawkish comments from the Fed regarding inflation unsettled markets. The steady stream of negative auto sector headlines also contributed to the negative tone, as reduced earnings, production cuts and downgrades to high yield status hit both General Motors and Ford Motor Co., causing spreads to widen dramatically within the auto sector and across fixed income credit markets.
Markets began to recover in mid-May as technicals strengthened and economic news turned generally positive. S&P and Fitch’s long-anticipated downgrades of Ford and GM to non-investment grade in early May improved the market’s tone, as the rating agencies’ actions removed some of the uncertainty in the market surrounding the credits’ ultimate resting places, allowing both high yield and investment grade investors to shore up their positions. Improving technicals, better overall demand and the relative absence of further negative headlines continued to buoy markets through June and July, despite a stronger new issue calendar in June and renewed outflows from high yield mutual funds. Resurgent investor risk appetites on the back of strong U.S. economic news and positive 2Q earnings announcements also contributed to positive performance, allowing markets to outperform despite the July 7th terrorist bombings in London (and the July 21st reprise) and weaker consumer sentiment.
However, markets again turned down in the last few months of the year amid volatility in the auto sector, stronger inflation, continued high energy prices and fears of a potentially slowing economy in the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. In addition, rising interest rates, with the Fed executing its thirteenth consecutive rate hike (8 times in 2005) to 4.25% at the December FOMC meeting, and worsening investor sentiment on the back of increased risk aversion largely offset the surprisingly resilient economic data seen post-Hurricanes. Technicals weakened during 2005 versus the prior few years as the market entered redemption mode in light of the rising rate environment. While total new supply was significantly lighter versus calendar year 2004, with only $103.6 billion coming to market in 2005 versus $142.4 billion in 2004, overall demand also declined. For the year ending December 31, 2005, high yield mutual funds reported outflows of approximately $11.48 billion (according to AMG Data Services).
Finally, while high yield fundamentals remain generally positive (i.e., strong corporate balance sheets, generally high cash levels), third quarter 2005’s high profile airline bankruptcies pushed annual high yield default rates closer to historical averages, at 3.73% by principal amount.viii Increased leveraged buyout activity and stock buybacks also releveraged some corporate balance sheets and put pressure on the market.
Spreads widened 17 basis points during 2005 to close at 359 basis points over U.S. Treasuries. Based on the 7.99% yieldix of the Citigroup High Yield Market Index as of December 31, 2005, high-yield bonds continued to offer competitive yields relative to U.S. Treasury notes.x However, high-yield issues are subject to additional risks, such as the
4 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
increased possibility of default because of their lower credit quality, and yields and prices will fluctuate.
Emerging Markets Debt Review
Emerging markets debt returned 10.73% for the calendar year ending December 31, 2005, as represented by the JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global.xi We believe strong country fundamentals, resurgent commodity prices (particularly in metals, agriculture and oil) and positive market technicals offset the downward pressure exerted by eight “measured” increases in the federal funds rate throughout 2005 and credit contagion from the Auto sector during the volatile Spring of 2005. Continued progress on political and economic reform in many emerging countries, commodity price strength and the generally positive macro environment supported broad credit quality improvements across emerging markets during the year.
Emerging debt trended positive during the first three months of the annual period despite concerns over the path of U.S. interest rates, risks of higher inflation and new bond issuance weighing on the market. However, indications of potentially more aggressive tightening (50-basis-point increments) from the Fed and increasingly prominent inflation worries led the market down in March, broadly in line with the U.S. Treasury market. Markets remained under pressure in early April as the overspill from volatile credit markets, with the highly visible troubles in the Auto sector, worsened technicals.
Nevertheless, markets turned again by mid-April and followed a generally upward trajectory through the remainder of the year as U.S. Treasury market volatility declined, the U.S. equity market recovered and country fundamentals remained broadly supportive. October proved the only negative month of performance in the second half of the annual period, declining as investors became increasingly risk averse on heightened inflation and growth concerns and the negative tone in U.S. equity markets.
Spreads tightened 110 basis points during 2005, closing at 237 basis points over U.S. Treasuries. (Of note, sovereign spreads tightened 67 basis points alone during the month of June 2005 due primarily to index rebalancing with the conclusion of the Argentine bond exchange.)
The outlook for the emerging debt markets is impacted by the strong performance and large degree of spread tightening the market has experienced over the past few years. With spreads at approximately 250 basis points over U.S. Treasuries the scope for substantial additional tightening seems limited. Nonetheless, we do not anticipate the degree of political and economic volatility that could lead to substantial spread widening in 2006.
Performance Update1
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2005, the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio returned 2.56%. In comparison, the Fund’s unmanaged benchmark, the Lehman Brothers
| |
1 | The Fund is an underlying investment option of various variable annuity and variable life insurance products. The Fund’s performance returns do not reflect the deduction of expenses imposed in connection with investing in variable annuity or variable life insurance contracts, such as administrative fees, account charges, and surrender charges, which, if reflected, would reduce the performance of the Fund. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 5
U.S. Aggregate Bond Indexxii returned 2.43% and its Lipper Variable General Bond Funds Category Average(2) increased 2.03% over the same period.
| |
Q. | What were the most significant factors affecting Fund performance? What were the leading contributors to performance? |
| |
| A.The portfolio’s allocation to higher-yielding bonds, specifically emerging markets debt, once again proved beneficial to portfolio performance during the annual period, as emerging debt was the best performer among broad fixed income asset classes during the year, according to the Lehman family of indices. |
| |
| What were the leading detractors from performance? |
| |
| A.Although we outperformed our benchmark, our underweight exposure to agencies slightly detracted from performance in the investment grade section of the portfolio, as agencies outperformed U.S. Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities during the 12 months. |
| |
Q. | Were there any significant changes to the Fund during the reporting period? |
A. Despite the strong performance seen throughout the year, we reduced our overall exposure to emerging markets debt by period end on a relative valuation basis as spreads reached all time tights on persistent strong technicals and fundamentals. We reallocated assets into mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasuries in the latter half of the annual period as both markets underwent significant selloffs during the third and fourth quarter before recovering value near period end.
We maintained our neutral duration position versus the benchmark during the annual period. (Duration is a measure of a portfolio’s price sensitivity to interest rate movements. A shorter duration helps cushion price declines in the event of rising rates.) We believe this neutral stance will benefit the portfolio as the Fed nears the end of its current rate tightening cycle, which should allow possible yield advantage during a period of expected low volatility. We also slightly extended our yield curve positioning versus the benchmark from the beginning of the period. We plan to maintain our current allocation to emerging markets debt and high yield in an effort to provide diversification and achieve greater total return than a pure U.S. investment grade portfolio alone.
| |
2 | Lipper, Inc. is a major independent mutual-fund tracking organization. Returns are based on the 12-month period ended December 31, 2005, including the reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, calculated among the 50 funds in the Fund’s Lipper category, and excluding sales charges. |
6 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Thank you for your investment in the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio. As ever, we appreciate that you have chosen us to manage your assets and we remain focused on seeking to achieve the Fund’s investment goals.
Sincerely,
| | |
![-s- Peter J. Wilby](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y1709636.gif) | | ![-s- Beth A. Semmel](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096semmel.gif) |
Peter J. Wilby | | Beth A. Semmel |
Vice President and Investment Officer | | Vice President and Investment Officer |
![-s- Roger Lavan](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096lavan.gif) | | ![-s- David M Zahn](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096zahn.gif) |
Roger M. Lavan | | David M. Zahn |
Vice President and Investment Officer | | Vice President and Investment Officer |
![-s- Olivier Asselin](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096asselin.gif) | | |
Olivier Asselin | | |
Vice President and Investment Officer | | |
February 2, 2006
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 7
The information provided is not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. Views expressed may differ from those of the firm as a whole.
The mention of sector breakdowns is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell any securities. The information provided regarding such sectors is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. Investors seeking financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies discussed should consult their financial professional. Portfolio holdings are subject to change at any time and may not be representative of the portfolio manager’s current or future investments. The Fund’s top five sector holdings (as a percentage of net assets) as of December 31, 2005 were: Mortgage-Backed Securities (49.7%), Repurchase Agreement (46.6%), Corporate Bonds and Notes (20.7%), U.S. Government Obligations (19.7%) and Sovereign Bonds (5.1%). The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change at any time.
RISKS: Foreign securities are subject to certain risks of overseas investing including currency fluctuations and changes in political and economic conditions, which could result in significant market fluctuations. These risks are magnified in emerging or developing markets. High yield bonds are subject to additional risks such as the increased risk of default and greater volatility because of the lower credit quality of the issues. The Fund may invest in derivatives, such as options and futures, which can be illiquid, may disproportionately increase losses and have a potentially large impact on fund performance. As interest rates rise, bond prices fall, reducing the value of the Fund’s share price. Please see the Fund’s prospectus for more information on these and other risks.
All index performance reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index.
| |
i | The Federal Reserve Board is responsible for the formulation of a policy designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices, and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments. |
| |
ii | A basis point is one one-hundredth (1/100 or 0.01) of one percent. |
|
iii | The federal funds rate is the interest rate that banks with excess reserves at a Federal Reserve district bank charge other banks that need overnight loans. |
|
iv | The FOMC is a policy-making body of the Federal Reserve System responsible for the formulation of a policy designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices, and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments. |
|
v | Gross domestic product is a market value of goods and services produced by labor and property in a given country. |
|
vi | The Consumer Price Index measures the average change in U.S. consumer prices over time in a fixed market basket of goods and services determined by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. |
| |
vii | The Citigroup High Yield Market Index is a broad-based unmanaged index of high yield securities. |
|
viii | Source: Altman High Yield Bond Default ad Return Report, November 2, 2005. |
| |
ix | As measured by the yield on the Citigroup High Yield Market Index as of the period’s close. |
|
x | Yields are subject to change and will fluctuate. |
|
xi | JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global (“EMBI Global”) tracks total returns for U.S. dollar denominated debt instruments issued by emerging market sovereign and quasi-sovereign entities: Brady bonds, loans, Eurobonds, and local market instruments. Countries covered are Algeria, Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Colombia, Cote d’Ivoire, Croatia, Ecuador, Greece, Hungary, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Nigeria, Panama, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Thailand, Turkey and Venezuela. |
| |
xii | The Lehman Brothers U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based bond index comprised of Government, Corporate, Mortgage and Asset-backed issues, rated investment grade or higher, and having at least one year to maturity. |
8 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Fund at a Glance (unaudited)
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio
![(GRAPH)](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y1709640.gif)
| |
* | Position represents less than 0.1%. |
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 9
Fund Performance
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio
| |
| Average Annual Total Returns(1) (unaudited) |
| | | | | |
Twelve Months Ended 12/31/05 | | | 2.56 | % |
| |
Five Years Ended 12/31/05 | | | 5.76 | | |
| |
Ten Years Ended 12/31/05 | | | 5.87 | |
| |
Inception* through 12/31/05 | | | 6.08 | | |
| |
| |
| Cumulative Total Return(1) (unaudited) |
| | | | | |
12/31/95 through 12/31/05 | | | 76.97 | % |
| |
| |
(1) | Assumes reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value. All figures represent past performance and are not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower. |
* | Inception date is October 16, 1991. |
10 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Historical Performance (unaudited)
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio
| |
| Value of $10,000 Invested in the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio vs. Lehman Brothers U.S. Aggregate Bond Index vs. Blended Index (December 1995 - December 2005) |
![(Performance Chart)](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y1709641.gif)
The chart above compares the growth in value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio on December 31, 1995 through December 31, 2005, with that of a similar investment in the Lehman Brothers U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and the Blended Index. Figures for the Lehman Brothers U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, an unmanaged index, are composed of the Lehman Brothers Intermediate Government/ Corporate Bond Index and the Mortgage-Backed Securities Index and include treasury issues, agency issues, corporate bond issues and mortgage-backed securities. The Merrill Lynch GNMA Master Index is a market capitalization weighted index of securities backed by mortgage pools of the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”). The Merrill Lynch Global Bond Index is a broad-based index consisting of fixed-rate, coupon-bearing bonds with an outstanding par greater than or equal to $25 million and a maturity range greater than or equal to one year. This index includes BBB-rated bonds and some bonds that are not rated by the major U.S. rating agencies. The Merrill Lynch High-Yield Master II Index is a market capitalization-weighted index of all domestic and Yankee High-Yield Bonds. Issues included in the index have maturities of at least one year and have a credit rating lower than BBB-Baa3, but are not in default.
Assumes reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value. All figures represent past performance and are not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. The graph does not reflect expenses associated with the separate account such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges which, if reflected, would reduce the total returns. Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 11
Manager Overview
Equity Index Portfolio
Special Shareholder Notices
Effective February 1, 2006, Charles Ko and Michael D. Soares, investment officers of TIMCO Asset Management, Inc., the Fund’s investment advisor (the “advisor”), will assume portfolio management responsibility for the Equity Index Portfolio. Mr. Ko and Mr. Soares are each a portfolio manager of Batterymarch Financial Management, Inc. (“Batterymarch”), which, like the manager, is a subsidiary of Legg Mason, Inc.
Mr. Ko joined Batterymarch in 2000 and has seven years investment experience. Mr. Soares joined Batterymarch in 1996 and has 11 years of investment experience.
On or about May 1, 2006, the Equity Index Portfolio will be renamed the Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Index Portfolio.
| |
Q. | What were the overall market conditions during the Fund’s reporting period? |
A. With oil prices receding from their peaks, the financial markets have turned to other worries, especially the housing market and inflation. The Federal Reserve Board (“Fed”)i has indicated to investors that it will do what is necessary to prevent an acceleration of inflation, which could stifle sustainable economic growth. Currently, the economy is expanding at a healthy pace. In our opinion, with the exception of a wider trade deficit, recent economic data on consumer demand, industrial production, and housing strongly support a sustainable economic growth environment.
A positive sign for sustainable economic growth came from the industrial sector. For the fourth quarter in a row, operating cash flow exceeded what companies spent on capital goods and inventories. The capability of corporations to increase capital spending is substantial, as the expenditures could be more than accommodated by internal funds. Although cash flow has been strong, the corporate sector is making little demand on the capital markets. After spending most of the past few years as the weakest part of the economy, the industrial sector has made a transition to a strong expansion path. Rising demand has provided a potent stimulus for industrial activity. While production has still not recovered to its previous peak level, the upward trend appears to be encouraging.
Performance Update(1)
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2005, Class I shares of the Equity Index Portfolio returned 4.52%. The Fund underperformed its unmanaged benchmark, the S&P 500 Indexii,
| |
1 | The Fund is an underlying investment option of various variable annuity and variable life insurance products. The Fund’s performance returns do not reflect the deduction of initial sales charges and expenses imposed in connection with investing in variable annuity or variable life insurance contracts, such as administrative fees, account charges, and surrender charges, which, if reflected, would reduce the performance of the Fund. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
12 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
which returned 4.91% for the same period. The Fund’s Lipper Variable S&P 500 Index Objective Funds Category Average(2) increased 4.52%.
| |
Q. | What were the most significant factors affecting Fund performance? |
A. Our performance analysis indicated that the energy and financials sectors contributed the most to performance. Conversely, the telecommunication services and consumer discretionary sectors were the biggest detractors from performance.
| | |
| | |
|
| | What were the leading contributors to performance? |
| | A. In the energy sector, our holdings in Exxon Mobil Corp., ConocoPhillips, and Schlumberger Ltd. contributed to performance. Similarly, in the financials sector, our positions in Citigroup Inc., Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. also added to the overall result. |
|
| | |
|
| | What were the leading detractors from performance? |
| | A. In the telecommunication services sector, our holdings in Verizon Communications Inc., Sprint Nextel Corp., and CenturyTel Inc. hurt us. Similarly, we were negatively impacted by positions in eBay Inc., Comcast Corp., and Ford Motor Co. |
| |
Q. | Were there any significant changes to the Fund during the reporting period? |
A. There were no significant changes made to the Fund in the past year.
Thank you for your investment in the Equity Index Portfolio. As ever, we appreciate that you have chosen us to manage your assets and we remain focused on seeking to achieve the Fund’s investment goals.
Sincerely,
The TIMCO Asset Management Inc. Portfolio Management Team
February 2, 2006
| |
2 | Lipper, Inc. is a major independent mutual-fund tracking organization. Returns are based on the 12-month period ended December 31, 2005, including the reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, calculated among the 55 funds in the Fund’s Lipper category, and excluding sales charges. |
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 13
The information provided is not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. Views expressed may differ from those of the firm as a whole.
Portfolio holdings and breakdowns are as of December 31, 2005 and are subject to change and may not be representative of the portfolio manager’s current or future investments. The Fund’s top ten holdings (as a percentage of net assets) as of this date were: General Electric Co. (3.3%), Exxon Mobil Corp. (3.1%), Citigroup Inc. (2.2%), Microsoft Corp. (2.1%), Procter & Gamble Co. (1.7%), Bank of America Corp. (1.6%), Johnson & Johnson (1.6%), American International Group Inc. (1.6%), Pfizer Inc. (1.5%) and Altria Group Inc. (1.4%). Please refer to pages 49 through 65 for a list and percentage breakdown of the Fund’s holdings.
The mention of sector breakdowns is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell any securities. The information provided regarding such sectors is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. Investors seeking financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies discussed should consult their financial professional. Portfolio holdings are subject to change at any time and may not be representative of the portfolio manager’s current or future investments. The Fund’s top five sector holdings (as a percentage of net assets) as of December 31, 2005 were: Financials (21.3%), Information Technology (15.1%), Health Care (13.3%), Industrials (11.4%) and Consumer Discretionary (10.8%). The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change at any time.
RISKS: Derivatives, such as options and futures, can be illiquid and harder to value, especially in declining markets. A small investment in certain derivatives may have a potentially large impact on the fund’s performance. Derivatives can disproportionately increase losses, as stated in the prospectus. Please see the Fund’s prospectus for more information on these and other risks.
All index performance reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index.
| |
i | The Federal Reserve Board is responsible for the formulation of a policy designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices, and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments. |
| |
ii | The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of 500 stocks that is generally representative of the performance of larger companies in the U.S. |
14 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Fund at a Glance (unaudited)
Equity Index Portfolio
![(GRAPH)](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y1709644.gif)
| |
* | Position represents less than 0.1%. |
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 15
Fund Performance
Equity Index Portfolio
| |
| Average Annual Total Returns(1) (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Class I | | Class II | |
| |
| |
| |
Twelve Months Ended 12/31/05 | | | 4.52 | % | | | 4.25 | % |
| |
Five Years Ended 12/31/05 | | | 0.24 | | | | (0.03 | ) | |
| |
Ten Years Ended 12/31/05 | | | 8.66 | | | | N/A | |
| |
Inception* through 12/31/05 | | | 9.99 | | | | 0.47 | | |
| |
| |
| Cumulative Total Returns(1) (unaudited) |
| | | | | |
Class I (12/31/95 through 12/31/05) | | | 129.36 | % |
| |
Class II (Inception* through 12/31/05) | | | 3.22 | | |
| |
| |
(1) | Assumes the reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value. All figures represent past performance and are not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower. |
|
* | Inception dates for Class I and II shares are October 16, 1991 and March 22, 1999, respectively. |
16 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Historical Performance (unaudited)
Equity Index Portfolio
| |
| Value of $10,000 Invested in the Equity Index (Class I Shares) vs. S&P 500 Index (December 1995 - December 2005) |
![Performance Chart](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y1709645.gif)
The chart above compares the growth in value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in Equity Index Portfolio (Class I shares) on December 31, 1995 through December 31, 2005, with that of a similar investment in the S&P 500 Index. The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index composed of 500 widely held common stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange, American Stock Exchange and over-the-counter markets. The performance of the Fund’s other class may be greater or less than the Class I share’s performance indicated on this chart, depending on whether greater or lesser sales charges and fees were incurred by shareholders investing in the other class.
Assumes reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value. All figures represent past performance and are not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. The graph does not reflect expenses associated with the separate account such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges which, if reflected, would reduce the total returns. Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 17
Manager Overview
Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund
Special Shareholder Notice
On or about May 1, 2006, the Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund will be renamed the Legg Mason Partners Variable Growth & Income Fund.
| |
Q. | What were the overall market conditions during the Fund’s reporting period? |
A. The market was led by the energy related (energy and utilities) and the defensive (health care and financials) sectors. Oil and natural gas prices during the period hit all time highs in late August 2005. Supply/demand fundamentals have been tight for energy for the past twenty-four months, but hit a peak in August from the damage done to Gulf of Mexico production facilities by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Energy fundamentals appear balanced to us, with strong demand growth in China and India offset by lower gasoline demand in the U.S. due to higher prices. The U.S. Federal Reserve Board (“Fed”)i raised interest rates 0.25% at each of the last thirteen meetings. We believe that it is likely that the Fed is likely to continue increasing rates until we hit historical normal levels of real interest rates. That would entail further increases into 2006. After the end of the Fund’s reporting period, at its January meeting, the Fed once again raised its target for the federal funds rateii by 0.25% to 4.50%. Defensive stocks outperformed due to fears that higher oil prices and interest rates would slow economic growth.
The Chinese government partly floated its currency vs. the dollar and the Yen starting in late July. Gold prices began to rise coincident with the first floating of the Yuan.
General Motors faced two crises in 2005, first the downgrading of its credit rating to below investment grade and second the bankruptcy of Delphi Automotive, its largest parts supplier and onetime spin off. Currently, the debt markets are pricing in a 30% probability of GM’s own bankruptcy within eighteen months. General Motors and Ford are struggling with high costs, declining market shares and a mix shift away from high profit SUV’s. The portfolio has avoided and will continue to avoid any auto related exposure.
Performance Update(1)
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2005, the Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund returned 3.63%. In comparison, the Fund’s unmanaged benchmarks, the S&P 500 Indexiii and the Russell 1000 Indexiv, returned 4.91% and 6.27%, respectively, for the same period. The Fund’s Lipper Variable Large-Cap Core Funds Category Average(2) increased 5.77%.
| |
1 | The Fund is an underlying investment option of various variable annuity and variable life insurance products. The Fund’s performance returns do not reflect the deduction of initial sales charges and expenses imposed in connection with investing in variable annuity or variable life insurance contracts, such as administrative fees, account charges, and surrender charges, which, if reflected, would reduce the performance of the Fund. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
| |
2 | Lipper, Inc. is a major independent mutual-fund tracking organization. Returns are based on the 12-month period ended December 31, 2005, including the reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, calculated among the 220 funds in the Fund’s Lipper category, and excluding sales charges. |
18 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
Q. | What were the most significant factors affecting Fund performance? |
A. The Fund had strong performance in the health care sector. Returns were helped by over-weights in HMO’s and generic drug stocks, and an underweight in large capitalization pharmaceuticals. We believe that cost pressures and a large number of drugs coming off patent will help HMO and generic drug company earnings and hurt the earnings of the traditional pharmaceutical companies. The consumer discretionary sector returns were helped by positions in Best Buy Co. Inc. and JC Penney Co. Inc., and the absence of any auto related stocks.
The Fund was hurt by poor stock picking in the information technology sector. Information technology appears to be seeing a changing of the guard, and the Fund owned too many of the old guard and not enough of the new. Positions in IBM and Dell Inc. detracted from performance.
| | |
| | What were the leading contributors to performance? |
| | A. The biggest contributors to performance were Boeing Co., Nexen Inc. and Coventry Health Care Inc. The best performing sectors were health care, consumer discretionary and industrials. Boeing was helped by terrific orders of the new 787 plane, which trounced rival Airbus’ A350. Nexen had excellent success in oil exploration and development projects. Coventry delivered better than expected cost savings, and saw favorable medical cost trends. The Fund continued to maintain positions in these securities at the end of the period. |
|
| | What were the leading detractors from performance? |
| | A. The stocks that most hurt performance were OSI Pharmaceuticals, Dell Inc. and Nortel Networks Corp. The worst performing sectors were information technology, consumer staples and utilities. OSI had unfavorable tests of its Tarceva drug, and made, what was in the eyes of Wall Street, a poor acquisition of Eyetech. Dell saw weaker than expected sales. Sales growth at Nortel was insufficient to create earnings leverage. The Fund sold its positions in OSI Pharmaceuticals and Nortel Networks during the period and continued to maintain a position in Dell. |
| |
Q. | Were there any significant changes to the Fund during the reporting period? |
A. The portfolio is higher growth and higher quality than it was coming into 2005. U.S. corporate operating margins are now the highest since the late 1960’s. We believe that companies who derive their growth from revenues (typically growth stocks) will show higher earnings per share growth than companies who derive their earnings growth from operating margin expansion (typically value stocks). Many companies with strong franchises, balance sheets and returns, such as Microsoft, Walmart and Ecolab, which historically have looked expensive to us, now appear to us to trade at attractive levels.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 19
Thank you for your investment in the Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund. As ever, we appreciate that you have chosen us to manage your assets and we remain focused on seeking to achieve the Fund’s investment goals.
Sincerely,
| | |
![-s- Michael A. Kagan](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y1709638.gif) | | ![-s- Kevin Caliendo](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y1709652.gif) |
Michael A. Kagan | | Kevin Caliendo |
Portfolio Management Team Leader | | Vice President and Investment Officer |
January 20, 2006
The information provided is not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. Views expressed may differ from those of the firm as a whole.
Portfolio holdings and breakdowns are as of December 31, 2005 and are subject to change and may not be representative of the portfolio manager’s current or future investments. The Fund’s top ten holdings (as a percentage of net assets) as of this date were: General Electric Co. (3.8%), Microsoft Corp. (3.7%), Boeing Co. (3.1%), Barrick Gold Corp. (2.6%), Wells Fargo & Co. (2.6%), Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (2.5%), Exxon Mobil Corp. (2.4%), Sprint Nextel Corp. (2.3%), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (2.2%) and Total SA, Sponsored ADR (2.1%). Please refer to pages 66 through 70 for a list and percentage breakdown of the Fund’s holdings.
The mention of sector breakdowns is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell any securities. The information provided regarding such sectors is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. Investors seeking financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies discussed should consult their financial professional. Portfolio holdings are subject to change at any time and may not be representative of the portfolio manager’s current or future investments. The Fund’s top five sector holdings (as a percentage of net assets) as of December 31, 2005 were: Financials (20.2%), Information Technology (15.6%), Industrials (11.6%), Health Care (11.3%) and Consumer Staples (10.9%). The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change at any time.
RISKS: High-yield bonds are subject to additional risks such as the increased risk of default and greater volatility because of the lower credit quality of the issues. The Fund may invest in derivatives, such as options and futures, which can be illiquid, may disproportionately increase losses, and have a potentially large impact on fund performance. Investments in small and medium capitalization companies may involve a higher degree of risk and volatility than investments in larger, more established companies. Investments in foreign securities are subject to certain risks of overseas investing including currency fluctuations and changes in political and economic conditions, which could result in significant market fluctuations. Please see the Fund’s prospectus for more information on these and other risks.
All index performance reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index.
| |
i | The Federal Reserve Board is responsible for the formulation of a policy designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices, and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments. |
| |
ii | The federal funds rate is the interest rate that banks with excess reserves at a Federal Reserve district bank charge other banks that need overnight loans. |
iii | The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of 500 stocks that is generally representative of the performance of larger companies in the U.S. |
iv | The Russell 1000 Index measures the performance of the 1,000 largest companies in the Russell 3000 Index, which represents approximately 92% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index. |
20 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Fund at a Glance (unaudited)
Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund
![(GRAPH)](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y1709646.gif)
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 21
Fund Performance
Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund
| |
| Average Annual Total Returns(1) (unaudited) |
| | | | | |
Twelve Months Ended 12/31/05 | | | 3.63 | % |
| |
Five Years Ended 12/31/05 | | | (0.54 | ) | |
| |
Ten Years Ended 12/31/05 | | | 6.37 | |
| |
Inception* through 12/31/05 | | | 7.55 | | |
| |
| |
| Cumulative Total Return(1) (unaudited) |
| | | | | |
12/31/95 through 12/31/05 | | | 85.52 | % |
| |
| |
(1) | Assumes reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value. All figures represent past performance and are not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower. |
* Inception date is October 16, 1991.
22 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Historical Performance (unaudited)
Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund
| |
| Value of $10,000 Invested in the Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund (Class I Shares) vs. Lipper Variable Large-Cap Core Funds Category Average and S&P 500 Index and Russell 1000 Index (December 1995 - December 2005) |
![(Performance Chart)](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y1709647.gif)
The chart above compares the growth in value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund Class I Shares on December 31, 1995 through December 31, 2005, with that of a similar investment in the Lipper Variable Large-Cap Core Funds Category Average, S&P 500 Index and Russell 1000 Index. The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index composed of 500 widely held common stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange, American Stock Exchange and over-the-counter markets. The Russell 1000 Index measures the performance of the 1,000 largest companies in the Russell 3000 Index, which represents approximately 92% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index.
The Lipper Variable Large-Cap Core Funds Category Average is composed of 220 large-cap funds as of December 31, 2005, which underlie variable annuities.
Assumes reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value. All figures represent past performance and are not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. The graph does not reflect expenses associated with the separate account such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges which, if reflected, would reduce the total returns. Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 23
Manager Overview
Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund
Special Shareholder Notice
Effective October 1, 2005, the advisory fee schedule was replaced with the fee schedule described below and the administration fee was reduced from 0.20% of the Fund’s average daily net assets to a fee in accordance with the fee schedule described below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fund’s Fee Rate | | Advisory | | Administration | | |
Average Daily Net Assets | | Fee Rate | | Fee Rate | | Total |
|
|
|
First $1 billion | | | 0.600% | | | | 0.150% | | | | 0.750% | |
Next $1 billion | | | 0.600% | | | | 0.125% | | | | 0.725% | |
Next $3 billion | | | 0.600% | | | | 0.100% | | | | 0.700% | |
Next $5 billion | | | 0.600% | | | | 0.075% | | | | 0.675% | |
Next $10 billion | | | 0.600% | | | | 0.050% | | | | 0.650% | |
|
On or about May 1, 2006, the Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund will be renamed the Legg Mason Partners Variable Aggressive Growth Fund.
| |
Q. | What were the overall market conditions during the Fund’s reporting period? |
A. After a lackluster start to 2005, we saw the market’s mood switch dramatically in April, as investors reached levels of pessimism we had not seen for sometime. These rarely seen extreme levels of bearish sentiment often foreshadow a market recovery and we viewed the shift as a very positive sign for the markets. Following the April lows, the market experienced a healthy rally in the second quarter, but gave back a portion of those gains as investors grew increasingly negative again. By the end of the third quarter, another wave of troubling headlines including the Gulf Coast hurricanes and continued rising short-term interest rates contributed to investor unease. However, we remained bullish. Again, the market rallied strongly in late October and continued on an upswing as several major equity indices reached or neared multi-year highs before they started to plateau to close out the year.
Performance Update1
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2005, Class I shares of the Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund returned 9.89%. These shares outperformed the Fund’s unmanaged benchmark, the Russell 3000 Growth Indexi, which returned 5.17% for the
| |
1 | The Fund is an underlying investment option of various variable annuity and variable life insurance products. The Fund’s performance returns do not reflect the deduction of initial sales charges and expenses imposed in connection with investing in variable annuity or variable life insurance contracts, such as administrative fees, account charges, and surrender charges, which, if reflected, would reduce the performance of the Fund. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
24 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
same period. The Fund’s Lipper Variable Multi-Cap Growth Funds Category Average(2) increased 10.80%.
Q. What were the most significant factors affecting Fund performance?
A. Energy stocks were clearly the biggest winners for the past year, buoyed by crude oil’s temporary spike to over $70 per barrel in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. The Fund’s overweight position in energy, with a focus on oil production services and equipment stocks, was the leading contributor to performance for the period. An underweight position in the information technology sector and the Fund’s overweight position in the financials sector also contributed significantly to performance for the year. The Fund’s overweight position in health care, with a concentration in biotechnology and biopharmaceuticals, along with a significant holding in the managed care industry, also had positive returns. However, positions in the consumer discretionary sector, especially cable TV holdings, and in the industrials sector detracted from performance for the period. In relation to the benchmark index, both stock selection and sector allocation contributed positively to Fund performance for the year, with sector allocation accounting for the majority of outperformance.
| | |
| | What were the leading contributors to performance? |
| | A. The greatest contributors to performance for the period included positions in Anadarko Petroleum Corp., Weatherford International Ltd. and Grant Prideco Inc. in energy, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in financials, and UnitedHealth Group Inc. in health care. All five top contributors were still held by the Fund at the close of the year. |
|
| | What were the leading detractors from performance? |
| | A. The greatest detractors from performance for the period included positions in Biogen Idec Inc. and ImClone Systems Inc. in health care, Comcast Corp. and Time Warner Inc. in consumer discretionary, and Tyco International Ltd. in industrials. All five top detractors were still held by the Fund at the close of the year. |
| |
Q. | Were there any significant changes to the Fund during the reporting period? |
A. While the Fund did experience a historically consistent level of portfolio turnover during the past year, the managers did not make any significant alterations to the portfolio or its sector allocation.
| |
2 | Lipper, Inc. is a major independent mutual-fund tracking organization. Returns are based on the 12-month period ended December 31, 2005, including the reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, calculated among the 115 funds in the Fund’s Lipper category, and excluding sales charges. |
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 25
Thank you for your investment in the Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund. As ever, we appreciate that you have chosen us to manage your assets and we remain focused on seeking to achieve the Fund’s investment goals.
Sincerely,
![-s- Richard A. Freeman](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y1709653.gif)
Richard A. Freeman
Lead Portfolio Manager — Salomon Brothers Asset Management Inc.
January 27, 2006
The information provided is not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. Views expressed may differ from those of the firm as a whole.
Portfolio holdings and breakdowns are as of December 31, 2005 and are subject to change and may not be representative of the portfolio manager’s current or future investments. The Fund’s top ten holdings (as a percentage of net assets) as of this date were: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (5.1%), UnitedHealth Group Inc. (5.1%), Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (5.0%), Forest Laboratories Inc. (4.8%), Amgen Inc. (4.7%), Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. (4.6%), Genzyme Corp. (4.6%), Weatherford International Ltd. (4.4%), Time Warner Inc. (4.1%) and Biogen Idec Inc. (4.1%). Please refer to pages 71 through 74 for a list and percentage breakdown of the Fund’s holdings.
The mention of sector breakdowns is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell any securities. The information provided regarding such sectors is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. Investors seeking financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies discussed should consult their financial professional. Portfolio holdings are subject to change at any time and may not be representative of the portfolio manager’s current or future investments. The Fund’s top five sector holdings (as a percentage of net assets) as of December 31, 2005 were: Health Care (33.6%), Consumer Discretionary (14.7%), Information Technology (14.1%), Energy (11.9%) and Financials (10.7%). The Fund’s portfolio’s composition is subject to change at any time.
RISKS: Investments in small- and medium-capitalization companies may involve a higher degree of risk and volatility than investments in larger, more established companies. Derivatives, such as options and futures, can be illiquid and harder to value, especially in declining markets. A small investment in certain derivatives may have a potentially large impact on the fund’s performance. Derivatives can disproportionately increase losses, as stated in the prospectus. Foreign securities are subject to certain risks of overseas investing including currency fluctuations, and changes in political and economic conditions, which could result in significant market fluctuations. Please see the Fund’s prospectus for more information on these and other risks.
All index performance reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index.
| |
i | The Russell 3000 Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 3000 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. |
26 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Fund at a Glance (unaudited)
Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund
![(GRAPH)](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y1709648.gif)
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 27
Fund Performance
Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund
| |
| Average Annual Total Returns(1) (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Class I | | Class II | |
| |
| |
Twelve Months Ended 12/31/05 | | | 9.89 | % | | | 9.64 | % |
| |
Five Years Ended 12/31/05 | | | 1.38 | | | | N/A | | |
| |
Ten Years Ended 12/31/05 | | | 18.65 | | | | N/A | |
| |
Inception* through 12/31/05 | | | 18.30 | | | | 15.89 | | |
| |
| |
| Cumulative Total Returns(1) (unaudited) |
| | | | | |
Class I (12/31/95 through 12/31/05) | | | 452.87 | % |
| |
Class II (Inception* through 12/31/05) | | | 47.57 | | |
| |
| |
(1) | Assumes reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value. All figures represent past performance and are not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower. |
* Inception dates for Class I and II shares are December 3, 1993 and May 12, 2003, respectively.
28 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Historical Performance (unaudited)
Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund
| |
| Value of $10,000 Invested in the Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund (Class I Shares) vs. Nasdaq Composite Index and Russell 3000 Growth Index (December 1995 - December 2005) |
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y1709649.gif)
The chart above compares the growth in value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund Class I Shares on December 31, 1995 through December 31, 2005, with that of a similar investment in the Nasdaq Composite Index (“Nasdaq”) and Russell 3000 Growth Index. The Nasdaq is a market capitalization price-only index that tracks the performance of domestic common stocks traded on the regular NASDAQ market as well as foreign common stocks and ADRs traded on the National Market System. Russell 3000 Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 3000 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
Assumes reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value. All figures represent past performance and are not a guarantee of future results. Prior to February 10, 2000, the Fund was managed by an advisor not affiliated with the current advisor. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 29
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
Example
As a shareholder of the Funds, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
This example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested on July 1, 2005 and held for the six months ended December 31, 2005.
Actual Expenses
The table below titled “Based on Actual Total Return” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information provided in this table, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. To estimate the expenses you paid on your account, divide your ending account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 ending account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During the Period”.
| |
| Based on Actual Total Return(1) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Beginning | | Ending | | Annualized | | Expenses |
| | Actual Total | | Account | | Account | | Expense | | Paid During |
| | Return(2) | | Value | | Value | | Ratio | | the Period(3) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio | | | 0.61 | % | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,006.10 | | | | 0.76 | % | | $ | 3.84 | |
|
Equity Index Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class I | | | 5.56 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,055.60 | | | | 0.35 | | | | 1.81 | |
| Class II | | | 5.42 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,054.20 | | | | 0.60 | | | | 3.11 | |
|
Salomon Brothers Variable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Growth & Income Fund | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class I | | | 5.56 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,055.60 | | | | 1.22 | | | | 6.32 | |
|
Salomon Brothers Variable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Aggressive Growth Fund | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class I | | | 12.92 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,129.20 | | | | 0.91 | | | | 4.88 | |
| Class II | | | 12.75 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,127.50 | | | | 1.16 | | | | 6.22 | |
|
| |
(1) | For the six months ended December 31, 2005. |
|
(2) | Assumes reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value. Total return is not annualized, as it may not be representative of the total return for the year. Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower. |
|
(3) | Expenses (net of voluntary fee waiver and/or expense reimbursements) are equal to each Funds’ or class’ respective annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, then divided by 365. |
30 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Fund Expenses (unaudited) (continued)
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table below titled “Based on Hypothetical Total Return” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5.00% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use the information provided in this table to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare the 5.00% hypothetical example relating to the Fund with the 5.00% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table below are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| |
| Based on Hypothetical Total Return(1) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Hypothetical | | Beginning | | Ending | | Annualized | | Expenses |
| | Annualized | | Account | | Account | | Expense | | Paid During |
| | Total Return | | Value | | Value | | Ratio | | the Period(2) |
|
|
|
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio | | | 5.00 | % | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,021.37 | | | | 0.76 | % | | $ | 3.87 | |
|
Equity Index Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class I | | | 5.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,023.44 | | | | 0.35 | | | | 1.79 | |
| Class II | | | 5.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,022.18 | | | | 0.60 | | | | 3.06 | |
|
Salomon Brothers Variable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Growth & Income Fund | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class I | | | 5.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,019.05 | | | | 1.22 | | | | 6.21 | |
|
Salomon Brothers Variable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Aggressive Growth Fund | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class I | | | 5.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,020.62 | | | | 0.91 | | | | 4.63 | |
| Class II | | | 5.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,019.36 | | | | 1.16 | | | | 5.90 | |
|
| |
(1) | For the six months ended December 31, 2005. |
|
(2) | Expenses (net of voluntary fee waiver and/or expense reimbursements) are equal to each Funds’ or class’ respective annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, then divided by 365. |
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 31
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) |
DIVERSIFIED STRATEGIC INCOME PORTFOLIO
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
Face | | | | | | |
Amount | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
CORPORATE BONDS & NOTES — 20.7% |
Aerospace & Defense — 0.3% |
| | | | | | L-3 Communications Corp., Senior Subordinated Notes: | | | | |
$ | 25,000 | | | BB+ | | 7.625% due 6/15/12 | | $ | 26,437 | |
| 125,000 | | | BB+ | | 6.375% due 10/15/15 (a) | | | 125,312 | |
| 150,000 | | | BB- | | Sequa Corp., Senior Notes, Series B, 8.875% due 4/1/08 | | | 157,125 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Aerospace & Defense | | | 308,874 | |
|
Airlines — 0.2% |
| | | | | | Continental Airlines Inc., Pass-Through Certificates: | | | | |
| 19,776 | | | B+ | | Series 2000-2, Class C, 8.312% due 4/2/11 | | | 17,705 | |
| 100,000 | | | B | | Series 2001-2, Class D, 7.568% due 12/1/06 | | | 98,594 | |
| | | | | | United Airlines Inc., Pass-Through Certificates: | | | | |
| 23,260 | | | NR | | Series 2000-1, Class B, 8.030% due 7/1/11 (b) | | | 16,992 | |
| 49,094 | | | Caa1 (i) | | Series 2000-2, Class B, 7.811% due 10/1/09 (b) | | | 42,766 | |
| 45,000 | | | NR | | Series 2001-1, Class C, 6.831% due 9/1/08 (b) | | | 31,899 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Airlines | | | 207,956 | |
|
Auto Components — 0.2% |
| 25,000 | | | B | | Arvin Capital I, Capital Securities, 9.500% due 2/1/27 | | | 25,250 | |
| 25,000 | | | B- | | Rexnord Corp., Senior Subordinated Notes, 10.125% due 12/15/12 | | | 27,000 | |
| 134,000 | | | BB- | | TRW Automotive Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 9.375% due 2/15/13 | | | 145,725 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Auto Components | | | 197,975 | |
|
Automobiles — 0.7% |
| 300,000 | | | BBB | | DaimlerChrysler North America Holding Corp., 4.050% due 6/4/08 | | | 292,214 | |
| | | | | | Ford Motor Co.: | | | | |
| | | | | | Debentures: | | | | |
| 50,000 | | | BB+ | | 6.625% due 10/1/28 | | | 32,500 | |
| 25,000 | | | BB+ | | 8.900% due 1/15/32 | | | 18,437 | |
| 250,000 | | | BB+ | | Notes, 7.450% due 7/16/31 | | | 171,250 | |
| | | | | | General Motors Corp., Senior Debentures: | | | | |
| 15,000 | | | B | | 8.250% due 7/15/23 | | | 9,713 | |
| 145,000 | | | B | | 8.375% due 7/15/33 | | | 96,425 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Automobiles | | | 620,539 | |
|
Beverages — 0.0% |
| 40,000 | | | B+ | | Cott Beverages USA Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 8.000% due 12/15/11 | | | 41,200 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
32 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Building Products — 0.1% |
| | | | | | Associated Materials Inc.: | | | | |
$ | 50,000 | | | CCC+ | | | Senior Discount Notes, step bond to yield 9.399% due 3/1/14 | | $ | 24,750 | |
| 20,000 | | | CCC+ | | Senior Subordinated Notes, 9.750% due 4/15/12 | | | 19,400 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Building Products | | | 44,150 | |
|
Capital Markets — 0.1% |
| 65,000 | | | B- | | BCP Crystal U.S. Holdings Corp., Senior Subordinated Notes, 9.625% due 6/15/14 | | | 72,638 | |
|
Chemicals — 1.1% |
| 50,000 | | | BB- | | Arco Chemical Co., Debentures, 9.800% due 2/1/20 | | | 56,375 | |
| 25,000 | | | B- | | Borden U.S. Finance Corp./ Nova Scotia Finance ULC, Second Priority Senior Secured Notes, 9.000% due 7/15/14 (a) | | | 24,875 | |
| 25,000 | | | BBB- | | FMC Corp., Senior Debentures, 7.750% due 7/1/11 | | | 27,044 | |
| 35,000 | | | B | | Huntsman International LLC, Senior Notes, 9.875% due 3/1/09 | | | 37,100 | |
| 50,000 | | | BB- | | ISP Chemco Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, Series B, 10.250% due 7/1/11 | | | 53,500 | |
| 75,000 | | | B+ | | ISP Holdings Inc., Senior Secured Notes, Series B, 10.625% due 12/15/09 | | | 79,125 | |
| 105,000 | | | BB- | | Lyondell Chemical Co., Senior Secured Notes, 11.125% due 7/15/12 | | | 117,994 | |
| 85,000 | | | BBB- | | Methanex Corp., Senior Notes, 8.750% due 8/15/12 | | | 94,987 | |
| 50,000 | | | B- | | OM Group Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 9.250% due 12/15/11 | | | 49,125 | |
| 75,000 | | | B- | | Resolution Performance Products LLC, Senior Subordinated Notes, 13.500% due 11/15/10 | | | 79,688 | |
| 200,000 | | | CCC+ | | Rhodia SA, Senior Notes, 7.625% due 6/1/10 | | | 202,000 | |
| 114,000 | | | BB- | | Westlake Chemical Corp., Senior Notes, 8.750% due 7/15/11 | | | 122,550 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Chemicals | | | 944,363 | |
|
Commercial Banks — 1.2% |
| 550,000 | | | A+ | | Bank of America Corp., Subordinated Notes, 7.400% due 1/15/11 | | | 606,478 | |
| 350,000 | | | A- | | Standard Chartered Bank PLC, Subordinated Notes, 8.000% due 5/30/31 (a) | | | 453,067 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Commercial Banks | | | 1,059,545 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 33
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Commercial Services & Supplies — 0.5% |
$ | 50,000 | | | CCC+ | | Allied Security Escrow Corp., Senior Subordinated Notes, 11.375% due 7/15/11 | | $ | 48,452 | |
| | | | | | Allied Waste North America Inc., Senior Secured Notes, Series B: | | | | |
| 115,000 | | | BB- | | 8.500% due 12/1/08 | | | 121,325 | |
| 50,000 | | | B+ | | 7.375% due 4/15/14 | | | 48,875 | |
| 75,000 | | | CCC+ | | Brand Services Inc., Senior Notes, 12.000% due 10/15/12 | | | 79,125 | |
| 25,000 | | | B- | | Cardtronics Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 9.250% due 8/15/13 (a) | | | 25,000 | |
| 75,000 | | | B+ | | Cenveo Corp., Senior Notes, 9.625% due 3/15/12 | | | 81,375 | |
| 25,000 | | | BB- | | Corrections Corporation of America, Senior Subordinated Notes, 6.250% due 3/15/13 | | | 24,875 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Commercial Services & Supplies | | | 429,027 | |
|
Communications Equipment — 0.1% |
| 75,000 | | | B- | | Nortel Networks Corp., Notes, 6.875% due 9/1/23 | | | 67,500 | |
|
Computers & Peripherals — 0.0% |
| 25,000 | | | B- | | SunGard Data Systems Inc., Senior Notes, 9.125% due 8/15/13 (a) | | | 26,000 | |
|
Containers & Packaging — 0.7% |
| 75,000 | | | B- | | Berry Plastics Corp., Senior Subordinated Notes, 10.750% due 7/15/12 | | | 81,000 | |
| 75,000 | | | B- | | Graphic Packaging International Corp., Senior Subordinated Notes, 9.500% due 8/15/13 | | | 72,000 | |
| 150,000 | | | B- | | JSG Funding PLC, Senior Notes, 9.625% due 10/1/12 | | | 150,750 | |
| 155,000 | | | BB- | | Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 8.875% due 2/15/09 | | | 162,556 | |
| 25,000 | | | B | | Plastipak Holdings Inc., Senior Notes, 8.500% due 12/15/15 (a) | | | 25,375 | |
| | | | | | Pliant Corp.: | | | | |
| 15,000 | | | C | | Senior Secured Second Lien Notes, 11.125% due 9/1/09 (b) | | | 13,425 | |
| 10,000 | | | C | | Senior Subordinated Notes, 13.000% due 6/1/10 (b) | | | 2,000 | |
| 25,000 | | | CCC- | | Radnor Holdings Corp., Senior Notes, 11.000% due 3/15/10 | | | 20,375 | |
| 100,000 | | | CCC+ | | Stone Container Finance Co. of Canada II, Senior Notes, 7.375% due 7/15/14 | | | 91,500 | |
| 35,000 | | | C | | Tekni-Plex Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, Series B, 12.750% due 6/15/10 | | | 19,250 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Containers & Packaging | | | 638,231 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
34 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Diversified Consumer Services — 0.3% |
| | | | | | Service Corp. International: | | | | |
$ | 55,000 | | | BB | | Debentures, 7.875% due 2/1/13 | | $ | 57,887 | |
| 195,000 | | | BB | | Senior Notes, 6.500% due 3/15/08 | | | 197,925 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Diversified Consumer Services | | | 255,812 | |
|
Diversified Financial Services — 1.1% |
| | | | | | Alamosa Delaware Inc.: | | | | |
| 44,000 | | | CCC+ | | | Senior Discount Notes, step bond to yield 11.437% due 7/31/09 | | | 48,345 | |
| 54,000 | | | CCC+ | | Senior Notes, 11.000% due 7/31/10 | | | 61,155 | |
| 20,000 | | | BB- | | Case Credit Corp., Notes, 6.750% due 10/21/07 | | | 20,300 | |
| 300,000 | | | A- | | EnCana Holdings Finance Corp., 5.800% due 5/1/14 | | | 313,225 | |
| | | | | | Ford Motor Credit Co., Notes: | | | | |
| 15,000 | | | BB+ | | 6.625% due 6/16/08 | | | 13,613 | |
| 25,000 | | | BB+ | | 7.875% due 6/15/10 | | | 22,518 | |
| | | | | | General Motors Acceptance Corp., Notes: | | | | |
| 20,000 | | | BB | | 7.250% due 3/2/11 | | | 18,402 | |
| 275,000 | | | BB | | 6.875% due 9/15/11 | | | 251,071 | |
| 150,000 | | | BB | | 6.750% due 12/1/14 | | | 135,160 | |
| 40,000 | | | B- | | Nell AF SARL, Senior Notes, 8.375% due 8/15/15 (a) | | | 39,800 | |
| 75,000 | | | B- | | Sensus Metering Systems Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 8.625% due 12/15/13 | | | 66,750 | |
| 50,000 | | | CCC+ | | Vanguard Health Holdings Co. I LLC, Senior Discount Notes, step bond to yield 9.384% due 10/1/15 | | | 36,750 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Diversified Financial Services | | | 1,027,089 | |
|
Diversified Telecommunication Services — 0.5% |
| 50,000 | | | D | | GT Group Telecom Inc., Senior Discount Notes, step bond to yield 15.233% due 2/1/10 (b)(c)(d) | | | 0 | |
| 25,000 | | | B+ | | Intelsat Bermuda Ltd., Senior Notes, 8.695% due 1/15/12 (a)(e) | | | 25,531 | |
| 75,000 | | | B | | Intelsat Ltd., Senior Discount Notes, step bond to yield 9.207% due 2/1/15 (a) | | | 49,687 | |
| 10,000 | | | B+ | | MCI Inc., Senior Notes, 8.735% due 5/1/14 | | | 11,088 | |
| 50,000 | | | B- | | Northern Telecom Capital Corp., Notes, 7.875% due 6/15/26 | | | 48,625 | |
| 16,000 | | | B+ | | PanAmSat Corp., 9.000% due 8/15/14 | | | 16,840 | |
| | | | | | Qwest Communications International Inc., Senior Notes: | | | | |
| 75,000 | | | B | | 7.500% due 2/15/14 | | | 77,437 | |
| 90,000 | | | B | | 7.500% due 2/15/14 (a) | | | 92,925 | |
| | | | | | Qwest Corp.: | | | | |
| 10,000 | | | BB | | 7.500% due 6/15/23 | | | 9,988 | |
| 135,000 | | | BB | | Debentures, 6.875% due 9/15/33 | | | 127,575 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Diversified Telecommunication Services | | | 459,696 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 35
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 0.6% |
| | | | | | Edison Mission Energy, Senior Notes: | | | | |
$ | 100,000 | | | B+ | | 10.000% due 8/15/08 | | $ | 110,000 | |
| 25,000 | | | B+ | | 7.730% due 6/15/09 | | | 25,938 | |
| 25,000 | | | B+ | | 9.875% due 4/15/11 | | | 29,281 | |
| 25,000 | | | B- | | Inergy L.P./ Inergy Finance Corp., 6.875% due 12/15/14 | | | 22,875 | |
| 90,000 | | | B | | Orion Power Holdings Inc., Senior Notes, 12.000% due 5/1/10 | | | 102,150 | |
| | | | | | Reliant Energy Inc., Senior Secured Notes: | | | | |
| 25,000 | | | B+ | | 9.250% due 7/15/10 | | | 25,125 | |
| 125,000 | | | B+ | | 9.500% due 7/15/13 | | | 125,937 | |
| 75,000 | | | B | | Texas Genco LLC/ Texas Genco Financing Corp., Senior Notes, 6.875% due 12/15/14 (a) | | | 81,563 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Electric Utilities | | | 522,869 | |
|
Electronic Equipment & Instruments — 0.2% |
| | | | | | Muzak LLC/ Muzak Finance Corp.: | | | | |
| 135,000 | | | CCC- | | Senior Notes, 10.000% due 2/15/09 | | | 118,462 | |
| 50,000 | | | CCC- | | Senior Subordinated Notes, 9.875% due 3/15/09 | | | 27,813 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Electronic Equipment & Instruments | | | 146,275 | |
|
Energy Equipment & Services — 0.0% |
| 22,000 | | | B- | | Dresser-Rand Group Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 7.625% due 11/1/14 (a) | | | 22,770 | |
|
Food & Staples Retailing — 0.3% |
| 75,000 | | | B- | | Jean Coutu Group Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 8.500% due 8/1/14 | | | 69,000 | |
| 200,000 | | | BBB- | | Safeway Inc., Senior Debentures, 7.250% due 2/1/31 | | | 216,462 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Food & Staples Retailing | | | 285,462 | |
|
Food Products — 0.6% |
| 45,000 | | | BB- | | Dean Foods Co., Senior Notes, 6.900% due 10/15/17 | | | 45,900 | |
| 25,000 | | | B- | | Doane Pet Care Co., Senior Subordinated Notes, 10.625% due 11/15/15 (a) | | | 26,187 | |
| 75,000 | | | B+ | | Dole Food Co. Inc., Senior Notes, 7.250% due 6/15/10 | | | 73,125 | |
| 355,000 | | | BBB+ | | Kraft Foods Inc., Senior Notes, 5.625% due 11/1/11 | | | 364,679 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Food Products | | | 509,891 | |
|
Health Care Providers & Services — 0.9% |
| 25,000 | | | B | | Community Health Systems Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 6.500% due 12/15/12 | | | 24,469 | |
| 25,000 | | | B | | DaVita Inc., Senior Notes, 6.625% due 3/15/13 | | | 25,563 | |
| 50,000 | | | B+ | | Extendicare Health Services Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 9.500% due 7/1/10 | | | 53,312 | |
| 140,000 | | | BB+ | | HCA Inc., Debentures, 8.360% due 4/15/24 | | | 153,342 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
36 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Health Care Providers & Services — 0.9% (continued) |
$ | 50,000 | | | B- | | IASIS Healthcare LLC/ IASIS Capital Corp., Senior Subordinated Notes, 8.750% due 6/15/14 | | $ | 52,750 | |
| 50,000 | | | CCC+ | | InSight Health Services Corp., Senior Subordinated Notes, Series B, 9.875% due 11/1/11 | | | 38,000 | |
| 50,000 | | | B- | | Psychiatric Solutions Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 7.750% due 7/15/15 | | | 51,875 | |
| | | | | | Tenet Healthcare Corp., Senior Notes: | | | | |
| 75,000 | | | B | | 7.375% due 2/1/13 | | | 69,562 | |
| 25,000 | | | B | | 9.875% due 7/1/14 | | | 25,438 | |
| 300,000 | | | BBB+ | | WellPoint Health Networks Inc., Notes, 6.375% due 1/15/12 | | | 319,057 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Health Care Providers & Services | | | 813,368 | |
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 1.2% |
| 40,000 | | | CCC+ | | AMC Entertainment Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 9.500% due 2/1/11 | | | 39,550 | |
| 75,000 | | | B+ | | Boyd Gaming Corp., Senior Subordinated Notes, 6.750% due 4/15/14 | | | 74,812 | |
| 75,000 | | | BB+ | | Caesars Entertainment Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 8.875% due 9/15/08 | | | 81,281 | |
| 25,000 | | | B- | | Carrols Corp. Senior Subordinated Notes, 9.000% due 1/15/13 | | | 24,438 | |
| 25,000 | | | B- | | Equinox Holdings Inc., Senior Notes, 9.000% due 12/15/09 | | | 26,844 | |
| 75,000 | | | B- | | Gaylord Entertainment Co., Senior Notes, 6.750% due 11/15/14 | | | 73,875 | |
| 75,000 | | | B- | | Herbst Gaming Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 7.000% due 11/15/14 | | | 75,000 | |
| 75,000 | | | CCC- | | Icon Health & Fitness Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 11.250% due 4/1/12 | | | 63,187 | |
| 50,000 | | | B | | Las Vegas Sands Corp., Senior Notes, 6.375% due 2/15/15 | | | 48,375 | |
| 25,000 | | | B- | | Leslie’s Poolmart, Senior Notes, 7.750% due 2/1/13 | | | 25,187 | |
| | | | | | MGM MIRAGE Inc.: | | | | |
| 125,000 | | | BB | | Senior Notes, 6.750% due 9/1/12 | | | 127,344 | |
| 30,000 | | | B+ | | Senior Subordinated Debentures, 7.625% due 7/15/13 | | | 31,275 | |
| 80,000 | | | B+ | | Senior Subordinated Notes, Series B, 10.250% due 8/1/07 | | | 85,700 | |
| 50,000 | | | B+ | | Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, Senior Subordinated Notes, 6.875% due 2/15/15 | | | 50,625 | |
| 75,000 | | | B | | Penn National Gaming Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 6.875% due 12/1/11 | | | 76,125 | |
| 75,000 | | | B- | | Pinnacle Entertainment Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 8.750% due 10/1/13 | | | 80,250 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 37
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 1.2% (continued) |
$ | 25,000 | | | B+ | | Scientific Games Corp., Senior Subordinated Notes, 6.250% due 12/15/12 | | $ | 24,719 | |
| 50,000 | | | B+ | | Turning Stone Casino Resort Enterprise, Senior Notes, 9.125% due 12/15/10 (a) | | | 51,750 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | | | 1,060,337 | |
|
Household Durables — 0.4% |
| 19,000 | | | CCC- | | Applica Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 10.000% due 7/31/08 | | | 18,525 | |
| 50,000 | | | CC | | Home Interiors & Gifts Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 10.125% due 6/1/08 | | | 35,250 | |
| 70,000 | | | BB- | | Schuler Homes Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 10.500% due 7/15/11 | | | 75,600 | |
| 50,000 | | | B- | | Sealy Mattress Co., Senior Subordinated Notes, 8.250% due 6/15/14 | | | 51,750 | |
| 35,000 | | | B+ | | Standard Pacific Corp., Senior Subordinated Notes, 9.250% due 4/15/12 | | | 36,181 | |
| 98,000 | | | B | | Tempur-Pedic Inc./ Tempur Production USA Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 10.250% due 8/15/10 | | | 106,453 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Household Durables | | | 323,759 | |
|
Independent Power Producers & Energy Traders — 0.6% |
| 55,000 | | | B- | | AES Corp., Senior Notes, 9.500% due 6/1/09 | | | 59,675 | |
| 100,000 | | | D | | Calpine Corp., Second Priority Senior Secured Notes, 8.500% due 7/15/10 (a)(b) | | | 82,500 | |
| | | | | | Dynegy Holdings Inc.: | | | | |
| 125,000 | | | B- | | | Second Priority Senior Secured Notes, 10.650% due 7/15/08 (a)(e) | | | 132,656 | |
| | | | | | Senior Debentures: | | | | |
| 125,000 | | | CCC+ | | 7.125% due 5/15/18 | | | 111,875 | |
| 30,000 | | | CCC+ | | 7.625% due 10/15/26 | | | 26,850 | |
| 50,000 | | | B- | | Mirant North America LLC, Senior Notes, 7.375% due 12/31/13 (a) | | | 50,813 | |
| 64,000 | | | B | | NRG Energy Inc., Second Priority Senior Secured Notes, 8.000% due 12/15/13 | | | 71,680 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Independent Power Producers & Energy Traders | | | 536,049 | |
|
Industrial Conglomerates — 0.1% |
| 50,000 | | | NR | | Aqua-Chem Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 11.250% due 7/1/08 (c) | | | 42,000 | |
| 50,000 | | | B | | Koppers Inc., Senior Notes, 9.875% due 10/15/13 | | | 54,500 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Industrial Conglomerates | | | 96,500 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
38 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Insurance — 0.1% |
$ | 65,000 | | | BB | | Markel Capital Trust I, Capital Securities, Series B, 8.710% due 1/1/46 | | $ | 69,967 | |
|
IT Services — 0.2% |
| 200,000 | | | B | | Iron Mountain Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 8.625% due 4/1/13 | | | 209,500 | |
|
Machinery — 0.1% |
| 100,000 | | | B- | | Mueller Holdings Inc., Discount Notes, step bond to yield 12.068% due 4/15/14 | | | 75,750 | |
| 30,000 | | | B+ | | NMHG Holding Co., Senior Notes, 10.000% due 5/15/09 | | | 32,100 | |
| 30,000 | | | CCC+ | | Wolverine Tube Inc., Senior Notes, 10.500% due 4/1/09 | | | 23,400 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Machinery | | | 131,250 | |
|
Media — 3.0% |
| 125,000 | | | B | | Advanstar Communications Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 10.750% due 8/15/10 | | | 137,656 | |
| 65,000 | | | B+ | | Cablevision Systems Corp., Senior Notes, Series B, 8.716% due 4/1/09 (e) | | | 65,975 | |
| 50,000 | | | B | | Cadmus Communications Corp., Senior Subordinated Notes, 8.375% due 6/15/14 | | | 51,625 | |
| 188,212 | | | B- | | CanWest Media Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 8.000% due 9/15/12 | | | 193,153 | |
| | | | | | Charter Communications Holdings LLC: | | | | |
| 175,000 | | | CCC- | | | Senior Accreting Notes, step bond to yield 18.099% due 5/15/14 (a) | | | 98,000 | |
| 189,000 | | | CCC- | | Senior Secured Notes, 11.000% due 10/1/15 (a) | | | 159,705 | |
| 245,000 | | | BBB+ | | Comcast Cable Communications Holdings Inc., Notes, 8.375% due 3/15/13 | | | 283,974 | |
| | | | | | CSC Holdings Inc., Senior Notes: | | | | |
| 50,000 | | | B+ | | 7.000% due 4/15/12 (a) | | | 47,500 | |
| 30,000 | | | B+ | | Series B, 7.625% due 4/1/11 | | | 30,000 | |
| 65,000 | | | B | | Dex Media East LLC/ Dex Media East Finance Co., Senior Notes, Series B, 12.125% due 11/15/12 | | | 76,375 | |
| 100,000 | | | B | | Dex Media West LLC/ Dex Media Finance Co., Senior Notes, Series B, 8.500% due 8/15/10 | | | 105,250 | |
| 81,000 | | | BB- | | DIRECTV Holdings LLC/ DIRECTV Financing Co. Inc., Senior Notes, 8.375% due 3/15/13 | | | 87,480 | |
| 150,000 | | | BB- | | EchoStar DBS Corp., Senior Notes, 6.625% due 10/1/14 | | | 144,562 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 39
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Media — 3.0% (continued) |
$ | 100,000 | | | B- | | Houghton Mifflin Co., Senior Discount Notes, step bond to yield 11.492% due 10/15/13 | | $ | 79,000 | |
| 130,000 | | | CCC+ | | Insight Communications Co. Inc., Senior Discount Notes, step bond to yield 12.269% due 2/15/11 | | | 136,500 | |
| 40,000 | | | B | | Lamar Media Corp. Senior Subordinated Notes, 6.625% due 8/15/15 | | | 40,350 | |
| 175,000 | | | B- | | LodgeNet Entertainment Corp., Senior Subordinated Debentures, 9.500% due 6/15/13 | | | 191,187 | |
| 175,000 | | | B | | Mediacom LLC/ Mediacom Capital Corp., Senior Notes, 9.500% due 1/15/13 | | | 171,719 | |
| 100,000 | | | B+ | | R.H. Donnelley Finance Corp. I, Senior Subordinated Notes, 10.875% due 12/15/12 (a) | | | 113,250 | |
| 25,000 | | | B+ | | R.H. Donnelley Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 10.875% due 12/15/12 | | | 28,313 | |
| 25,000 | | | B | | Rainbow National Services LLC, Senior Subordinated Debentures, 10.375% due 9/1/14 (a) | | | 28,125 | |
| 75,000 | | | B | | Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 8.750% due 12/15/11 | | | 79,312 | |
| 250,000 | | | BBB+ | | Time Warner Inc., Senior Notes, 7.625% due 4/15/31 | | | 279,237 | |
| 33,000 | | | B+ | | Yell Finance BV, Senior Discount Notes, step bond to yield 12.263% due 8/1/11 | | | 34,073 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Media | | | 2,662,321 | |
|
Metals & Mining — 0.3% |
| 75,000 | | | B+ | | Aleris International Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 10.375% due 10/15/10 | | | 82,312 | |
| 75,000 | | | B | | Novelis Inc., Senior Notes, 7.500% due 2/15/15 (a) | | | 70,313 | |
| 75,000 | | | BBB | | Phelps Dodge Corp., Senior Notes, 8.750% due 6/1/11 | | | 86,331 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Metals & Mining | | | 238,956 | |
|
Multi-Utilities — 0.3% |
| 45,000 | | | BB+ | | Avista Corp., Senior Notes, 9.750% due 6/1/08 | | | 49,343 | |
| 200,000 | | | BBB | | Dominion Resources Inc., Senior Notes, 6.300% due 3/15/33 | | | 204,156 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Multi-Utilities | | | 253,499 | |
|
Multiline Retail — 0.0% |
| 25,000 | | | B- | | Neiman Marcus Group Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 10.375% due 10/15/15 (a) | | | 25,531 | |
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 2.0% |
| | | | | | Chesapeake Energy Corp., Senior Notes: | | | | |
| 100,000 | | | BB | | 6.625% due 1/15/16 | | | 101,750 | |
| 50,000 | | | BB | | 6.250% due 1/15/18 | | | 49,250 | |
| 88,000 | | | B+ | | Cimarex Energy Co., Senior Notes, 9.600% due 3/15/12 | | | 95,920 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
40 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 2.0% (continued) |
| | | | | | El Paso Corp., Medium-Term Notes: | | | | |
$ | 50,000 | | | B- | | 7.375% due 12/15/12 | | $ | 50,500 | |
| 350,000 | | | B- | | 7.800% due 8/1/31 | | | 350,875 | |
| 75,000 | | | B | | EXCO Resources Inc., Senior Notes, 7.250% due 1/15/11 | | | 76,500 | |
| 175,000 | | | BB | | Gaz Capital SA, 8.625% due 4/28/34 | | | 222,250 | |
| 25,000 | | | BB- | | Massey Energy Co., Senior Notes, 6.625% due 11/15/10 | | | 25,531 | |
| 35,000 | | | BB- | | SESI LLC, Senior Notes, 8.875% due 5/15/11 | | | 36,838 | |
| 75,000 | | | B- | | Stone Energy Corp., Senior Subordinated Notes, 6.750% due 12/15/14 | | | 71,438 | |
| 105,000 | | | B | | Swift Energy Co., Senior Subordinated Notes, 9.375% due 5/1/12 | | | 113,400 | |
| 275,000 | | | BBB- | | Valero Energy Corp., Notes, 4.750% due 6/15/13 | | | 267,331 | |
| | | | | | Vintage Petroleum Inc.: | | | | |
| 50,000 | | | BB- | | Senior Notes, 8.250% due 5/1/12 | | | 53,875 | |
| 25,000 | | | B | | Senior Subordinated Notes, 7.875% due 5/15/11 | | | 26,250 | |
| | | | | | Williams Cos. Inc.: | | | | |
| 150,000 | | | B+ | | Notes, 7.125% due 9/1/11 | | | 156,562 | |
| 125,000 | | | B+ | | Senior Notes, 7.625% due 7/15/19 | | | 134,687 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | | | 1,832,957 | |
|
Paper & Forest Products — 0.2% |
| 50,000 | | | BB- | | Appleton Papers Inc., Senior Notes, 8.125% due 6/15/11 | | | 48,875 | |
| 75,000 | | | B+ | | Bowater Canada Finance Corp., Notes, 7.950% due 11/15/11 | | | 73,125 | |
| | | | | | Buckeye Technologies Inc.: | | | | |
| 25,000 | | | B+ | | Senior Notes, 8.500% due 10/1/13 | | | 25,125 | |
| 23,000 | | | B | | Senior Subordinated Notes, 9.250% due 9/15/08 | | | 23,115 | |
| 25,000 | | | B+ | | Domtar Inc., Notes, 7.125% due 8/15/15 | | | 21,438 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Paper & Forest Products | | | 191,678 | |
|
Personal Products — 0.0% |
| 50,000 | | | CCC+ | | DEL Laboratories Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 8.000% due 2/1/12 | | | 39,750 | |
|
Pharmaceuticals — 0.1% |
| 75,000 | | | BB- | | Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Senior Notes, 7.000% due 12/15/11 | | | 74,063 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 41
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Real Estate — 0.9% |
$ | 275,000 | | | BBB | | Boston Properties LP, Senior Notes, 6.250% due 1/15/13 | | $ | 288,899 | |
| 130,000 | | | BB- | | Host Marriott LP, Senior Notes, Series I, 9.500% due 1/15/07 | | | 135,200 | |
| 300,000 | | | BBB- | | iStar Financial Inc., Senior Notes, 5.150% due 3/1/12 | | | 290,913 | |
| 75,000 | | | CCC+ | | MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership LP/ MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp., Senior Notes, 10.500% due 6/15/09 | | | 79,406 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Real Estate | | | 794,418 | |
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 0.2% |
| | | | | | Amkor Technology Inc.: | | | | |
| 125,000 | | | CCC+ | | Senior Notes, 7.125% due 3/15/11 | | | 110,625 | |
| 60,000 | | | CCC | | Senior Subordinated Notes, 10.500% due 5/1/09 | | | 55,500 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | | | 166,125 | |
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods — 0.2% |
| 75,000 | | | B- | | Levi Strauss & Co., Senior Notes, 9.750% due 1/15/15 | | | 78,375 | |
| 125,000 | | | B- | | Simmons Co., Senior Discount Notes, step bond to yield 9.955% due 12/15/14 (a) | | | 68,125 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | | | 146,500 | |
|
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance — 0.1% |
| 100,000 | | | CCC- | | Ocwen Capital Trust I, Capital Securities, 10.875% due 8/1/27 | | | 106,000 | |
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services — 1.0% |
| 50,600 | | | CCC | | AirGate PCS Inc., Senior Secured Subordinated Notes, 9.375% due 9/1/09 | | | 53,130 | |
| 225,000 | | | A | | New Cingular Wireless Services Inc., Senior Notes, 8.750% due 3/1/31 | | | 298,972 | |
| 125,000 | | | A- | | Nextel Communications Inc., Senior Notes, Series D, 7.375% due 8/1/15 | | | 132,018 | |
| 49,000 | | | B- | | SBA Communications Corp., Senior Notes, 8.500% due 12/1/12 | | | 54,635 | |
| 250,000 | | | A- | | Sprint Capital Corp., Notes, 8.375% due 3/15/12 | | | 290,098 | |
| 50,000 | | | B- | | UbiquiTel Operating Co., Senior Notes, 9.875% due 3/1/11 | | | 55,625 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Wireless Telecommunication Services | | | 884,478 | |
|
| | | | | | TOTAL CORPORATE BONDS & NOTES (Cost — $18,344,159) | | | 18,544,868 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
42 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES — 1.8% |
Credit Card — 0.5% |
$ | 42,854 | | | B | | First Consumers Master Trust, Series 2001-A, Class A, 4.679% due 9/15/08 (e) | | $ | 42,611 | |
| 423,000 | | | BBB | | Metris Master Trust, Series 2001-2, Class B, 5.450% due 11/20/09 (e) | | | 423,907 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Credit Card | | | 466,518 | |
|
Home Equity — 1.3% |
| 200,000 | | | A | | Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc., Series 2004-R11, Class M5, 5.579% due 11/25/34 (e) | | | 203,533 | |
| | | | | | Bear Stearns Asset-Backed Securities NIM Trust: | | | | |
| 599 | | | BBB | | Series 2003-HE1N, Class N1, 6.500% due 1/25/34 (a) | | | 599 | |
| 27,457 | | | BBB | | Series 2004-FR1N, Class A1, 5.000% due 5/25/34 (a) | | | 27,343 | |
| 40,004 | | | BBB | | Series 2004-HE6N, Class A1, 5.250% due 8/25/34 (a) | | | 39,858 | |
| | | | | | Countrywide Asset-Backed Certificates: | | | | |
| 270,000 | | | AA | | Series 2004-05, Class M4, 5.629% due 6/25/34 (e) | | | 273,992 | |
| 37,138 | | | BBB | | Series 2004-05N, Class N1, 5.500% due 10/25/35 (a) | | | 37,036 | |
| | | | | | Novastar Home Equity Loan: | | | | |
| 90,000 | | | A | | Series 2003-04, Class M2, 6.004% due 2/25/34 (e) | | | 91,581 | |
| 200,000 | | | A+ | | Series 2004-01, Class M4, 5.354% due 6/25/34 (e) | | | 200,901 | |
| | | | | | Sail Net Interest Margin Notes: | | | | |
| 10,224 | | | BBB | | Series 2003-003, Class A, 7.750% due 4/27/33 (a) | | | 10,189 | |
| 24,617 | | | BBB+ | | Series 2004-004A, Class A, 5.000% due 4/27/34 (a) | | | 24,603 | |
| 55,270 | | | BBB | | Series 2004-11A, Class A2, 4.750% due 1/27/35 (a) | | | 54,988 | |
| 60,441 | | | BB+ | | Series 2004-11A, Class B, 7.500% due 1/27/35 (a) | | | 59,337 | |
| 74,865 | | | BBB- | | Series 2004-BN2A, Class A, 5.000% due 12/27/34 (a) | | | 74,741 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Home Equity | | | 1,098,701 | |
|
| | | | | | TOTAL ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES (Cost — $1,510,124) | | | 1,565,219 | |
|
MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES — 49.7% |
FHLMC — 21.7% |
| | | | | | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (FHLMC) Gold: | | | | |
| 142,309 | | | | | 7.000% due 2/1/15-5/1/16 | | | 147,707 | |
| 198,133 | | | | | 6.500% due 9/1/31 | | | 203,520 | |
| 15,100,000 | | | | | 5.000% due 1/12/36 (f)(g) | | | 14,618,688 | |
| 2,000,000 | | | | | 5.500% due 1/12/36 (f)(g) | | | 1,981,876 | |
| 2,500,000 | | | | | 6.000% due 1/12/36 (f)(g) | | | 2,525,000 | |
|
| | | | | | Total FHLMC | | | 19,476,791 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 43
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
FNMA — 27.5% |
| | | | | | Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA): | | | | |
$ | 775,769 | | | | | 6.500% due 3/1/16-3/1/32 | | $ | 797,874 | |
| 1,387,787 | | | | | 6.000% due 8/1/16-4/1/32 | | | 1,406,273 | |
| 164,423 | | | | | 5.500% due 12/1/16 | | | 165,680 | |
| 3,000,000 | | | | | 4.000% due 1/12/21 (f)(g) | | | 2,865,000 | |
| 63,138 | | | | | 7.500% due 2/1/30-7/1/31 | | | 66,169 | |
| 648,299 | | | | | 7.000% due 5/1/30-4/1/32 | | | 676,827 | |
| 2,600,000 | | | | | 4.500% due 1/12/36 (f)(g) | | | 2,448,875 | |
| 1,500,000 | | | | | 5.000% due 1/12/36 (f)(g) | | | 1,453,593 | |
| 9,250,000 | | | | | 5.500% due 1/12/36 (f)(g) | | | 9,160,386 | |
| 5,500,000 | | | | | 6.000% due 1/12/36 (f)(g) | | | 5,551,562 | |
|
| | | | | | Total FNMA | | | 24,592,239 | |
|
GNMA — 0.5% |
| | | | | | Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA): | | | | |
| 77,749 | | | | | 7.000% due 6/15/28-7/15/29 | | | 81,731 | |
| 361,893 | | | | | 6.500% due 9/15/28-2/15/31 | | | 378,814 | |
|
| | | | | | Total GNMA | | | 460,545 | |
|
| | | | | | TOTAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (Cost — $45,152,871) | | | 44,529,575 | |
|
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATION — 0.4% |
| 388,155 | | | AAA | | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2001-J2A, Class A1, 5.447% due 7/16/34 (a) (Cost — $402,332) | | | 392,882 | |
|
U.S. GOVERNMENT & AGENCY OBLIGATIONS — 19.7% |
U.S. Government Obligations — 19.7% |
| | | | | | U.S. Treasury Notes: | | | | |
| 1,000,000 | | | | | 3.625% due 1/15/10 | | | 972,891 | |
| 700,000 | | | | | 4.000% due 3/15/10 | | | 690,184 | |
| 6,400,000 | | | | | 4.000% due 4/15/10 (h) | | | 6,309,005 | |
| 2,500,000 | | | | | 4.125% due 8/15/10 | | | 2,476,173 | |
| 2,100,000 | | | | | 5.000% due 2/15/11 | | | 2,163,575 | |
| 2,500,000 | | | | | 3.875% due 2/15/13 | | | 2,423,928 | |
| 630,000 | | | | | 4.250% due 11/15/14 | | | 622,863 | |
| 2,000,000 | | | | | 4.250% due 8/15/15 (h) | | | 1,974,766 | |
|
| | | | | | TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT & AGENCY OBLIGATIONS (Cost — $17,920,979) | | | 17,633,385 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
44 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Shares | | | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
COMMON STOCKS — 0.4% |
CONSUMER STAPLES — 0.0% |
Food Products — 0.0% |
| 3,630 | | | | | Aurora Foods Inc. (c)(d)* | | $ | 0 | |
|
FINANCIALS — 0.0% |
Diversified Financial Services — 0.0% |
| 369 | | | | | Outsourcing Solutions Inc. (d)* | | | 1,567 | |
|
INDUSTRIALS — 0.0% |
Aerospace & Defense — 0.0% |
| 95 | | | | | Northrop Grumman Corp. | | | 5,710 | |
|
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY — 0.0% |
Communications Equipment — 0.0% |
| 578 | | | | | Motorola Inc. | | | 13,057 | |
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 0.0% |
| 63 | | | | | Freescale Semiconductor Inc., Class B Shares* | | | 1,586 | |
|
| | | | | | TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | | | 14,643 | |
|
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.4% |
Diversified Telecommunication Services — 0.2% |
| 66 | | | | | McLeodUSA Inc., Class A Shares* | | | 1 | |
| 6,485 | | | | | Telewest Global Inc.* | | | 154,472 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Diversified Telecommunication Services | | | 154,473 | |
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services — 0.2% |
| 6,004 | | | | | Alamosa Holdings Inc.* | | | 111,735 | |
| 1,308 | | | | | Crown Castle International Corp.* | | | 35,198 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Wireless Telecommunication Services | | | 146,933 | |
|
| | | | | | TOTAL TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES | | | 301,406 | |
|
| | | | | | TOTAL COMMON STOCKS (Cost — $402,637) | | | 323,326 | |
|
CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCKS — 0.2% |
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.2% |
Wireless Telecommunication Services — 0.2% |
| 125 | | | | | Alamosa Holdings Inc., Series B, 7.500% due 7/31/13 | | | 171,422 | |
| 700 | | | | | Crown Castle International Corp., 6.250% due 8/15/12 | | | 37,100 | |
|
| | | | | | TOTAL CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCKS (Cost — $56,298) | | | 208,522 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 45
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants | | | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
WARRANTS — 0.0% |
| 50 | | | | | American Tower Corp., Class A Shares, Expires 8/1/08 (a)* | | $ | 19,138 | |
| 60 | | | | | Cybernet Internet Services International Inc., Expires 7/1/09 (a)(c)(d)* | | | 0 | |
| 50 | | | | | GT Group Telecom Inc., Class B Shares, Expires 2/1/10 (a)(c)(d)* | | | 0 | |
| 50 | | | | | IWO Holdings Inc., Expires 1/15/11 (a)(c)(d)* | | | 0 | |
| 60 | | | | | Merrill Corp., Class B Shares, Expires 5/1/09 (a)(c)(d)* | | | 0 | |
| 10 | | | | | Pliant Corp., Expires 6/1/10 (a)(c)(d)* | | | 0 | |
| 150 | | | | | RSL Communications Ltd., Class A Shares, Expires 11/15/06 (c)(d)* | | | 0 | |
| 1,000 | | | | | United Mexican States, Series XW10, Expires 10/10/06* | | | 4,250 | |
|
| | | | | | TOTAL WARRANTS (Cost — $26,526) | | | 23,388 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount† | | Rating‡ | | | | |
|
|
|
SOVEREIGN BONDS — 5.1% |
Argentina — 0.2% |
| | | | | | Republic of Argentina: | | | | |
$ | 209,260 | ARS | | B- | | 5.830% due 12/31/33 | | | 75,461 | |
| 70,345 | | | B- | | Discount Notes, 8.280% due 12/31/33 | | | 59,266 | |
| 195,557 | | | NR | | Series GDP, zero coupon, due 12/15/35 (e) | | | 10,365 | |
| 593,471 | ARS | | NR | | Series PGDP, zero coupon, due 12/15/35 (e) | | | 9,315 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Argentina | | | 154,407 | |
|
Brazil — 1.1% |
| | | | | | Federative Republic of Brazil: | | | | |
| 250,000 | | | BB- | | 8.750% due 2/4/25 | | | 276,875 | |
| 485,000 | | | BB- | | Collective Action Securities, 8.000% due 1/15/18 | | | 523,679 | |
| 214,122 | | | BB- | | DCB, Series L, 5.250% due 4/15/12 | | | 211,980 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Brazil | | | 1,012,534 | |
|
Bulgaria — 0.1% |
| 50,000 | | | BBB | | Republic of Bulgaria, 8.250% due 1/15/15 | | | 60,500 | |
|
Colombia — 0.3% |
| | | | | | Republic of Colombia: | | | | |
| 50,000 | | | BB | | 10.000% due 1/23/12 | | | 59,550 | |
| 50,000 | | | BB | | 10.750% due 1/15/13 | | | 62,250 | |
| 125,000 | | | BB | | 8.125% due 5/21/24 | | | 135,313 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Colombia | | | 257,113 | |
|
Ecuador — 0.1% |
| 75,000 | | | CCC+ | | Republic of Ecuador, step bond to yield 11.055% due 8/15/30 | | | 68,438 | |
|
Italy — 0.4% |
| 350,000 | | | AA- | | Region of Lombardy, 5.804% due 10/25/32 | | | 378,702 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
46 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount† | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Mexico — 0.9% |
| | | | | | United Mexican States: | | | | |
$ | 225,000 | | | BBB | | 8.125% due 12/30/19 | | $ | 276,750 | |
| | | | | | Series A, Notes: | | | | |
| 225,000 | | | BBB | | 6.375% due 1/16/13 | | | 239,625 | |
| 275,000 | | | BBB | | 5.875% due 1/15/14 | | | 285,312 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Mexico | | | 801,687 | |
|
Panama — 0.2% |
| | | | | | Republic of Panama: | | | | |
| 50,000 | | | BB | | 7.250% due 3/15/15 | | | 53,325 | |
| 75,000 | | | BB | | 9.375% due 1/16/23 | | | 94,313 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Panama | | | 147,638 | |
|
Peru — 0.2% |
| | | | | | Republic of Peru: | | | | |
| 50,000 | | | BB | | 9.125% due 2/21/12 | | | 57,375 | |
| 73,500 | | | BB | | FLIRB, 5.000% due 3/7/17 | | | 69,090 | |
| 61,500 | | | BB | | PDI, 5.000% due 3/7/17 | | | 58,348 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Peru | | | 184,813 | |
|
Philippines — 0.4% |
| | | | | | Republic of the Philippines: | | | | |
| 50,000 | | | BB- | | 8.375% due 3/12/09 | | | 53,563 | |
| 50,000 | | | BB- | | 8.875% due 3/17/15 | | | 55,437 | |
| 100,000 | | | BB- | | 9.875% due 1/15/19 | | | 118,875 | |
| 75,000 | | | BB- | | 10.625% due 3/16/25 | | | 95,437 | |
| 50,000 | | | BB- | | 9.500% due 2/2/30 | | | 58,875 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Philippines | | | 382,187 | |
|
Russia — 0.4% |
| 250,000 | | | BBB | | Russian Federation, 11.000% due 7/24/18 | | | 369,687 | |
|
South Africa — 0.1% |
| 50,000 | | | BBB+ | | Republic of South Africa, 6.500% due 6/2/14 | | | 54,125 | |
|
Turkey — 0.4% |
| | | | | | Republic of Turkey: | | | | |
| 100,000 | | | BB- | | 9.000% due 6/30/11 | | | 114,250 | |
| 25,000 | | | BB- | | 11.500% due 1/23/12 | | | 31,781 | |
| 75,000 | | | BB- | | 7.375% due 2/5/25 | | | 77,625 | |
| 100,000 | | | BB- | | 11.875% due 1/15/30 | | | 154,000 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Turkey | | | 377,656 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 47
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | | | |
Amount† | | Rating‡ | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Venezuela — 0.3% |
| | | | | | Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Collective Action Security: | | | | |
$ | 150,000 | | | B+ | | 10.750% due 9/19/13 | | $ | 184,875 | |
| 75,000 | | | B+ | | 9.375% due 1/13/34 | | | 89,063 | |
|
| | | | | | Total Venezuela | | | 273,938 | |
|
| | | | | | TOTAL SOVEREIGN BONDS (Cost — $4,266,505) | | | 4,523,425 | |
|
| | | | | | TOTAL INVESTMENTS BEFORE SHORT-TERM INVESTMENT (Cost — $88,082,431) | | | 87,744,590 | |
|
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENT — 46.6% |
Repurchase Agreement — 46.6% |
$ | 41,675,000 | | | | | Interest in $577,312,000 joint tri-party repurchase agreement dated 12/30/05 with Morgan Stanley, 4.250% due 1/3/06; Proceeds at maturity — $41,694,680; (Fully collateralized by various U.S. government agency obligations, 0.000% to 6.300% due 2/5/07 to 10/6/25; Market value — $42,949,861) (Cost — $41,675,000) (h) | | | 41,675,000 | |
|
| | | | | | TOTAL INVESTMENTS — 144.6% (Cost — $129,757,431#) | | | 129,419,590 | |
| | | | | | Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets — (44.6)% | | | (39,898,077) | |
|
| | | | | | TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | | $ | 89,521,513 | |
|
| |
‡ | All ratings are by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Service, unless otherwise footnoted. All ratings are unaudited. |
| |
* | Non-income producing security. |
| |
† | Face amount denominated in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated. |
| |
(a) | Security is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. This security may be resold in transactions that are exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. This security has been deemed liquid pursuant to guidelines approved by the Board of Trustees, unless otherwise noted. |
|
(b) | Security is currently in default. |
|
(c) | Illiquid security. |
|
(d) | Security is valued in good faith at fair value by or under the direction of the Board of Trustees (See Note 1). |
|
(e) | Variable rate security. Interest rate disclosed is that which is in effect at December 31, 2005. |
|
(f) | This security is traded on a “to-be-announced” basis (See Note 1). |
|
(g) | All or a portion of this security is acquired under mortgage dollar roll agreement (See Notes 1 and 3). |
|
(h) | All or a portion of this security is segregated for open futures contracts, TBA’s and mortgage dollar rolls. |
|
(i) | Ratings by Moody’s Investors Service. All ratings are unaudited. |
|
# | Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is $129,774,456. |
See page 75 for definitions of ratings.
| |
| Abbreviations used in this schedule: |
|
| ARS — Argentine Peso |
| DCB — Debt Conversion Bond |
| FLIRB — Front-Loaded Interest Reduction Bonds |
| GDP — Gross Domestic Product |
| NIM — Net Interest Margin |
| PDI — Past Due Interest |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
48 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) |
EQUITY INDEX PORTFOLIO
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
COMMON STOCKS — 100.1% |
CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY — 10.8% |
Auto Components — 0.2% |
| 9,248 | | | Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. | | $ | 141,679 | |
| 22,568 | | | Dana Corp. | | | 162,038 | |
| 26,308 | | | Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.* | | | 457,233 | |
| 28,596 | | | Johnson Controls Inc. | | | 2,084,935 | |
|
| | | | Total Auto Components | | | 2,845,885 | |
|
Automobiles — 0.3% |
| 275,291 | | | Ford Motor Co. | | | 2,125,247 | |
| 84,129 | | | General Motors Corp. | | | 1,633,785 | |
| 40,900 | | | Harley-Davidson Inc. | | | 2,105,941 | |
|
| | | | Total Automobiles | | | 5,864,973 | |
|
Distributors — 0.1% |
| 25,682 | | | Genuine Parts Co. | | | 1,127,953 | |
|
Diversified Consumer Services — 0.1% |
| 21,713 | | | Apollo Group Inc., Class A Shares* | | | 1,312,768 | |
| 47,973 | | | H&R Block Inc. | | | 1,177,737 | |
|
| | | | Total Diversified Consumer Services | | | 2,490,505 | |
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 1.5% |
| 64,126 | | | Carnival Corp. | | | 3,428,817 | |
| 19,771 | | | Darden Restaurants Inc. | | | 768,696 | |
| 27,404 | | | Harrah’s Entertainment Inc. | | | 1,953,631 | |
| 48,952 | | | Hilton Hotels Corp. | | | 1,180,233 | |
| 50,866 | | | International Game Technology | | | 1,565,655 | |
| 25,431 | | | Marriott International Inc., Class A Shares | | | 1,703,114 | |
| 185,973 | | | McDonald’s Corp. | | | 6,271,010 | |
| 114,261 | | | Starbucks Corp.* | | | 3,428,973 | |
| 32,294 | | | Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. | | | 2,062,295 | |
| 17,145 | | | Wendy’s International Inc. | | | 947,433 | |
| 42,338 | | | Yum! Brands Inc. | | | 1,984,805 | |
|
| | | | Total Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | | | 25,294,662 | |
|
Household Durables — 0.7% |
| 12,022 | | | Black & Decker Corp. | | | 1,045,433 | |
| 19,103 | | | Centex Corp. | | | 1,365,674 | |
| 40,588 | | | D.R. Horton Inc. | | | 1,450,209 | |
| 21,687 | | | Fortune Brands Inc. | | | 1,692,020 | |
| 11,607 | | | KB HOME | | | 843,365 | |
| 28,278 | | | Leggett & Platt Inc. | | | 649,263 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 49
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Household Durables — 0.7% (continued) |
| 19,805 | | | Lennar Corp., Class A Shares | | $ | 1,208,501 | |
| 11,698 | | | Maytag Corp. | | | 220,156 | |
| 41,191 | | | Newell Rubbermaid Inc. | | | 979,522 | |
| 31,756 | | | Pulte Homes Inc. | | | 1,249,916 | |
| 8,406 | | | Snap-on Inc. | | | 315,729 | |
| 10,915 | | | Stanley Works | | | 524,357 | |
| 9,959 | | | Whirlpool Corp. | | | 834,166 | |
|
| | | | Total Household Durables | | | 12,378,311 | |
|
Internet & Catalog Retail — 0.6% |
| 45,739 | | | Amazon.com Inc.* | | | 2,156,594 | |
| 170,498 | | | eBay Inc.* | | | 7,374,038 | |
|
| | | | Total Internet & Catalog Retail | | | 9,530,632 | |
|
Leisure Equipment & Products — 0.2% |
| 14,350 | | | Brunswick Corp. | | | 583,471 | |
| 42,487 | | | Eastman Kodak Co. | | | 994,196 | |
| 26,893 | | | Hasbro Inc. | | | 542,701 | |
| 59,939 | | | Mattel Inc. | | | 948,235 | |
|
| | | | Total Leisure Equipment & Products | | | 3,068,603 | |
|
Media — 3.3% |
| 10,047 | | | CCE Spinco Inc.* | | | 131,616 | |
| 80,383 | | | Clear Channel Communications Inc. | | | 2,528,045 | |
| 326,033 | | | Comcast Corp., Class A Shares* | | | 8,463,817 | |
| 8,631 | | | Dow Jones & Co. Inc. | | | 306,314 | |
| 12,841 | | | E.W. Scripps Co., Class A Shares | | | 616,625 | |
| 36,133 | | | Gannett Co. Inc. | | | 2,188,576 | |
| 62,447 | | | Interpublic Group of Cos. Inc.* | | | 602,613 | |
| 10,191 | | | Knight-Ridder Inc. | | | 645,090 | |
| 55,677 | | | McGraw-Hill Cos. Inc. | | | 2,874,603 | |
| 6,282 | | | Meredith Corp. | | | 328,800 | |
| 21,275 | | | New York Times Co., Class A Shares | | | 562,724 | |
| 364,011 | | | News Corp., Class A Shares | | | 5,660,371 | |
| 26,989 | | | Omnicom Group Inc. | | | 2,297,574 | |
| 697,221 | | | Time Warner Inc. | | | 12,159,534 | |
| 39,307 | | | Tribune Co. | | | 1,189,430 | |
| 34,385 | | | Univision Communications Inc., Class A Shares* | | | 1,010,575 | |
| 235,506 | | | Viacom Inc., Class B Shares | | | 7,677,496 | |
| 287,039 | | | Walt Disney Co. | | | 6,880,325 | |
|
| | | | Total Media | | | 56,124,128 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
50 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Multiline Retail — 1.2% |
| 17,052 | | | Big Lots Inc.* | | $ | 204,795 | |
| 9,840 | | | Dillard’s Inc., Class A Shares | | | 244,229 | |
| 48,033 | | | Dollar General Corp. | | | 915,989 | |
| 23,033 | | | Family Dollar Stores Inc. | | | 570,988 | |
| 39,368 | | | Federated Department Stores Inc. | | | 2,611,279 | |
| 37,083 | | | J.C. Penney Co. Inc. | | | 2,061,815 | |
| 51,140 | | | Kohl’s Corp.* | | | 2,485,404 | |
| 32,810 | | | Nordstrom Inc. | | | 1,227,094 | |
| 15,236 | | | Sears Holdings Corp.* | | | 1,760,215 | |
| 131,533 | | | Target Corp. | | | 7,230,369 | |
|
| | | | Total Multiline Retail | | | 19,312,177 | |
|
Specialty Retail — 2.2% |
| 27,162 | | | AutoNation Inc.* | | | 590,230 | |
| 8,326 | | | AutoZone Inc.* | | | 763,911 | |
| 43,878 | | | Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.* | | | 1,586,190 | |
| 60,303 | | | Best Buy Co. Inc. | | | 2,621,975 | |
| 24,073 | | | Circuit City Stores Inc. | | | 543,809 | |
| 86,006 | | | Gap Inc. | | | 1,517,146 | |
| 318,163 | | | Home Depot Inc. | | | 12,879,238 | |
| 52,123 | | | Limited Brands Inc. | | | 1,164,949 | |
| 115,954 | | | Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | | | 7,729,494 | |
| 46,802 | | | Office Depot Inc.* | | | 1,469,583 | |
| 10,320 | | | OfficeMax Inc. | | | 261,715 | |
| 19,979 | | | RadioShack Corp. | | | 420,158 | |
| 17,079 | | | Sherwin-Williams Co. | | | 775,728 | |
| 109,402 | | | Staples Inc. | | | 2,484,519 | |
| 21,331 | | | Tiffany & Co. | | | 816,764 | |
| 69,418 | | | TJX Cos. Inc. | | | 1,612,580 | |
|
| | | | Total Specialty Retail | | | 37,237,989 | |
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods — 0.4% |
| 56,369 | | | Coach Inc.* | | | 1,879,343 | |
| 17,608 | | | Jones Apparel Group Inc. | | | 540,918 | |
| 16,077 | | | Liz Claiborne Inc. | | | 575,878 | |
| 28,323 | | | NIKE Inc., Class B Shares | | | 2,458,153 | |
| 7,954 | | | Reebok International Ltd. | | | 463,161 | |
| 13,324 | | | V.F. Corp. | | | 737,350 | |
|
| | | | Total Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | | | 6,654,803 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY | | | 181,930,621 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 51
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
CONSUMER STAPLES — 9.6% |
Beverages — 2.1% |
| 115,526 | | | Anheuser-Busch Cos. Inc. | | $ | 4,962,997 | |
| 12,410 | | | Brown-Forman Corp., Class B Shares | | | 860,261 | |
| 308,675 | | | Coca-Cola Co. | | | 12,442,689 | |
| 44,557 | | | Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. | | | 854,158 | |
| 29,305 | | | Constellation Brands Inc., Class A Shares* | | | 768,670 | |
| 8,496 | | | Molson Coors Brewing Co., Class B Shares | | | 569,147 | |
| 20,837 | | | Pepsi Bottling Group Inc. | | | 596,147 | |
| 247,992 | | | PepsiCo Inc. | | | 14,651,367 | |
|
| | | | Total Beverages | | | 35,705,436 | |
|
Food & Staples Retailing — 2.4% |
| 54,666 | | | Albertson’s Inc. | | | 1,167,119 | |
| 71,354 | | | Costco Wholesale Corp. | | | 3,529,882 | |
| 120,677 | | | CVS Corp. | | | 3,188,286 | |
| 107,967 | | | Kroger Co.* | | | 2,038,417 | |
| 66,335 | | | Safeway Inc. | | | 1,569,486 | |
| 20,217 | | | SUPERVALU INC | | | 656,648 | |
| 94,006 | | | Sysco Corp. | | | 2,918,886 | |
| 371,003 | | | Wal-Mart Stores Inc. | | | 17,362,941 | |
| 151,766 | | | Walgreen Co. | | | 6,717,163 | |
| 19,617 | | | Whole Foods Market Inc. | | | 1,518,160 | |
|
| | | | Total Food & Staples Retailing | | | 40,666,988 | |
|
Food Products — 1.1% |
| 96,621 | | | Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. | | | 2,382,674 | |
| 27,566 | | | Campbell Soup Co. | | | 820,640 | |
| 77,318 | | | ConAgra Foods Inc. | | | 1,568,009 | |
| 54,497 | | | General Mills Inc. | | | 2,687,792 | |
| 50,454 | | | H.J. Heinz Co. | | | 1,701,309 | |
| 27,408 | | | Hershey Co. | | | 1,514,292 | |
| 38,207 | | | Kellogg Co. | | | 1,651,306 | |
| 19,710 | | | McCormick & Co. Inc., Non Voting Shares | | | 609,433 | |
| 116,384 | | | Sara Lee Corp. | | | 2,199,658 | |
| 37,420 | | | Tyson Foods Inc., Class A Shares | | | 639,882 | |
| 26,720 | | | Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co. | | | 1,776,613 | |
|
| | | | Total Food Products | | | 17,551,608 | |
|
Household Products — 2.3% |
| 22,629 | | | Clorox Co. | | | 1,287,364 | |
| 77,119 | | | Colgate-Palmolive Co. | | | 4,229,977 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
52 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Household Products — 2.3% (continued) |
| 70,664 | | | Kimberly-Clark Corp. | | $ | 4,215,108 | |
| 500,549 | | | Procter & Gamble Co. | | | 28,971,776 | |
|
| | | | Total Household Products | | | 38,704,225 | |
|
Personal Products — 0.2% |
| 11,172 | | | Alberto-Culver Co. | | | 511,119 | |
| 69,836 | | | Avon Products Inc. | | | 1,993,818 | |
|
| | | | Total Personal Products | | | 2,504,937 | |
|
Tobacco — 1.5% |
| 310,876 | | | Altria Group Inc. | | | 23,228,655 | |
| 12,619 | | | Reynolds American Inc. | | | 1,202,969 | |
| 24,600 | | | UST Inc. | | | 1,004,418 | |
|
| | | | Total Tobacco | | | 25,436,042 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL CONSUMER STAPLES | | | 160,569,236 | |
|
ENERGY — 9.3% |
Energy Equipment & Services — 1.7% |
| 50,651 | | | Baker Hughes Inc. | | | 3,078,568 | |
| 48,052 | | | BJ Services Co. | | | 1,762,067 | |
| 75,464 | | | Halliburton Co. | | | 4,675,749 | |
| 23,361 | | | Nabors Industries Ltd.* | | | 1,769,596 | |
| 25,750 | | | National-Oilwell Varco Inc.* | | | 1,614,525 | |
| 20,398 | | | Noble Corp. | | | 1,438,875 | |
| 16,315 | | | Rowan Cos. Inc. | | | 581,467 | |
| 87,374 | | | Schlumberger Ltd. | | | 8,488,384 | |
| 48,942 | | | Transocean Inc.* | | | 3,410,768 | |
| 48,943 | | | Weatherford International Ltd.* | | | 1,771,736 | |
|
| | | | Total Energy Equipment & Services | | | 28,591,735 | |
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 7.6% |
| 11,848 | | | Amerada Hess Corp. | | | 1,502,563 | |
| 35,057 | | | Anadarko Petroleum Corp. | | | 3,321,651 | |
| 48,824 | | | Apache Corp. | | | 3,345,421 | |
| 56,705 | | | Burlington Resources Inc. | | | 4,887,971 | |
| 334,746 | | | Chevron Corp. | | | 19,003,530 | |
| 206,938 | | | ConocoPhillips | | | 12,039,653 | |
| 67,229 | | | Devon Energy Corp. | | | 4,204,502 | |
| 98,348 | | | El Paso Corp. | | | 1,195,912 | |
| 35,575 | | | EOG Resources Inc. | | | 2,610,138 | |
| 929,278 | | | Exxon Mobil Corp. | | | 52,197,545 | |
| 17,140 | | | Kerr-McGee Corp. | | | 1,557,340 | |
| 15,605 | | | Kinder Morgan Inc. | | | 1,434,880 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 53
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 7.6% (continued) |
| 54,364 | | | Marathon Oil Corp. | | $ | 3,314,573 | |
| 24,382 | | | Murphy Oil Corp. | | | 1,316,384 | |
| 59,475 | | | Occidental Petroleum Corp. | | | 4,750,863 | |
| 20,200 | | | Sunoco Inc. | | | 1,583,276 | |
| 90,690 | | | Valero Energy Corp. | | | 4,679,604 | |
| 84,755 | | | Williams Cos. Inc. | | | 1,963,773 | |
| 53,843 | | | XTO Energy Inc. | | | 2,365,861 | |
|
| | | | Total Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | | | 127,275,440 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL ENERGY | | | 155,867,175 | |
|
FINANCIALS — 21.3% |
Capital Markets — 3.1% |
| 115,595 | | | Bank of New York Co. Inc. | | | 3,681,701 | |
| 16,679 | | | Bear Stearns Cos. Inc. | | | 1,926,925 | |
| 154,809 | | | Charles Schwab Corp. | | | 2,271,048 | |
| 60,267 | | | E*TRADE Financial Corp.* | | | 1,257,170 | |
| 12,745 | | | Federated Investors Inc., Class B Shares | | | 472,075 | |
| 22,147 | | | Franklin Resources Inc. | | | 2,082,039 | |
| 69,150 | | | Goldman Sachs Group Inc. | | | 8,831,146 | |
| 33,452 | | | Janus Capital Group Inc. | | | 623,211 | |
| 40,451 | | | Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. | | | 5,184,605 | |
| 62,133 | | | Mellon Financial Corp. | | | 2,128,055 | |
| 137,533 | | | Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. | | | 9,315,110 | |
| 161,283 | | | Morgan Stanley | | | 9,151,197 | |
| 27,695 | | | Northern Trust Corp. | | | 1,435,155 | |
| 49,069 | | | State Street Corp. | | | 2,720,385 | |
| 19,226 | | | T. Rowe Price Group Inc. | | | 1,384,849 | |
|
| | | | Total Capital Markets | | | 52,464,671 | |
|
Commercial Banks — 5.7% |
| 52,076 | | | AmSouth Bancorp | | | 1,364,912 | |
| 597,187 | | | Bank of America Corp. | | | 27,560,180 | |
| 81,367 | | | BB&T Corp. | | | 3,410,091 | |
| 24,802 | | | Comerica Inc. | | | 1,407,762 | |
| 18,572 | | | Compass Bancshares Inc. | | | 896,842 | |
| 82,578 | | | Fifth Third Bancorp | | | 3,114,842 | |
| 18,595 | | | First Horizon National Corp. | | | 714,792 | |
| 34,243 | | | Huntington Bancshares Inc. | | | 813,271 | |
| 60,612 | | | KeyCorp | | | 1,995,953 | |
| 11,990 | | | M&T Bank Corp. | | | 1,307,509 | |
| 30,678 | | | Marshall & Ilsley Corp. | | | 1,320,381 | |
| 84,719 | | | National City Corp. | | | 2,844,017 | |
| 70,792 | | | North Fork Bancorporation Inc. | | | 1,936,869 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
54 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 5.7% (continued) |
| 43,236 | | | PNC Financial Services Group Inc. | | $ | 2,673,282 | |
| 68,324 | | | Regions Financial Corp. | | | 2,333,948 | |
| 53,913 | | | SunTrust Banks Inc. | | | 3,922,710 | |
| 46,264 | | | Synovus Financial Corp. | | | 1,249,591 | |
| 271,326 | | | U.S. Bancorp | | | 8,109,934 | |
| 234,420 | | | Wachovia Corp. | | | 12,391,441 | |
| 250,893 | | | Wells Fargo & Co. | | | 15,763,607 | |
| 15,512 | | | Zions Bancorporation | | | 1,172,087 | |
|
| | | | Total Commercial Banks | | | 96,304,021 | |
|
Consumer Finance — 1.3% |
| 184,537 | | | American Express Co. | | | 9,496,274 | |
| 44,763 | | | Capital One Financial Corp. | | | 3,867,523 | |
| 187,122 | | | MBNA Corp. | | | 5,080,362 | |
| 62,121 | | | SLM Corp. | | | 3,422,246 | |
|
| | | | Total Consumer Finance | | | 21,866,405 | |
|
Diversified Financial Services — 3.9% |
| 36,718 | | | Ameriprise Financial Inc. | | | 1,505,438 | |
| 29,989 | | | CIT Group Inc. | | | 1,552,830 | |
| 755,360 | | | Citigroup Inc. (a) | | | 36,657,621 | |
| 521,962 | | | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | | 20,716,672 | |
| 37,430 | | | Moody’s Corp. | | | 2,298,950 | |
| 41,497 | | | Principal Financial Group Inc. | | | 1,968,203 | |
|
| | | | Total Diversified Financial Services | | | 64,699,714 | |
|
Insurance — 4.9% |
| 46,985 | | | ACE Ltd. | | | 2,510,878 | |
| 74,558 | | | AFLAC Inc. | | | 3,460,982 | |
| 97,680 | | | Allstate Corp. | | | 5,281,558 | |
| 15,991 | | | Ambac Financial Group Inc. | | | 1,232,266 | |
| 387,605 | | | American International Group Inc. | | | 26,446,289 | |
| 47,169 | | | Aon Corp. | | | 1,695,726 | |
| 29,491 | | | Chubb Corp. | | | 2,879,796 | |
| 26,146 | | | Cincinnati Financial Corp. | | | 1,168,203 | |
| 56,059 | | | Genworth Financial Inc., Class A Shares | | | 1,938,520 | |
| 44,541 | | | Hartford Financial Services Group Inc. | | | 3,825,627 | |
| 20,161 | | | Jefferson-Pilot Corp. | | | 1,147,766 | |
| 25,548 | | | Lincoln National Corp. | | | 1,354,810 | |
| 20,144 | | | Loews Corp. | | | 1,910,658 | |
| 79,433 | | | Marsh & McLennan Cos. Inc. | | | 2,522,792 | |
| 20,044 | | | MBIA Inc. | | | 1,205,847 | |
| 112,263 | | | MetLife Inc. | | | 5,500,887 | |
| 29,331 | | | Progressive Corp. | | | 3,425,274 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 55
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Insurance — 4.9% (continued) |
| 76,129 | | | Prudential Financial Inc. | | $ | 5,571,882 | |
| 18,528 | | | SAFECO Corp. | | | 1,046,832 | |
| 100,528 | | | St. Paul Travelers Cos. Inc. | | | 4,490,586 | |
| 15,468 | | | Torchmark Corp. | | | 860,021 | |
| 44,442 | | | UnumProvident Corp. | | | 1,011,056 | |
| 25,836 | | | XL Capital Ltd., Class A Shares | | | 1,740,830 | |
|
| | | | Total Insurance | | | 82,229,086 | |
|
Real Estate — 0.7% |
| 14,092 | | | Apartment Investment and Management Co., Class A Shares | | | 533,664 | |
| 31,525 | | | Archstone-Smith Trust | | | 1,320,582 | |
| 60,940 | | | Equity Office Properties Trust | | | 1,848,310 | |
| 42,779 | | | Equity Residential | | | 1,673,515 | |
| 27,422 | | | Plum Creek Timber Co. Inc. | | | 988,563 | |
| 36,868 | | | ProLogis | | | 1,722,473 | |
| 12,250 | | | Public Storage Inc. | | | 829,570 | |
| 27,231 | | | Simon Property Group Inc. | | | 2,086,712 | |
| 17,500 | | | Vornado Realty Trust | | | 1,460,725 | |
|
| | | | Total Real Estate | | | 12,464,114 | |
|
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance — 1.7% |
| 88,530 | | | Countrywide Financial Corp. | | | 3,026,841 | |
| 143,921 | | | Fannie Mae | | | 7,024,784 | |
| 102,795 | | | Freddie Mac | | | 6,717,653 | |
| 38,077 | | | Golden West Financial Corp. | | | 2,513,082 | |
| 13,931 | | | MGIC Investment Corp. | | | 916,939 | |
| 53,831 | | | Sovereign Bancorp Inc. | | | 1,163,826 | |
| 148,292 | | | Washington Mutual Inc. | | | 6,450,702 | |
|
| | | | Total Thrifts & Mortgage Finance | | | 27,813,827 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL FINANCIALS | | | 357,841,838 | |
|
HEALTH CARE — 13.3% |
Biotechnology — 1.5% |
| 183,274 | | | Amgen Inc.* | | | 14,452,988 | |
| 29,279 | | | Applera Corp.— Applied Biosystems Group | | | 777,650 | |
| 50,429 | | | Biogen Idec Inc.* | | | 2,285,946 | |
| 16,348 | | | Chiron Corp.* | | | 726,832 | |
| 38,100 | | | Genzyme Corp.* | | | 2,696,718 | |
| 67,614 | | | Gilead Sciences Inc.* | | | 3,558,525 | |
| 36,753 | | | MedImmune Inc.* | | | 1,287,090 | |
|
| | | | Total Biotechnology | | | 25,785,749 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
56 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies — 2.2% |
| 7,928 | | | Bausch & Lomb Inc. | | $ | 538,311 | |
| 92,542 | | | Baxter International Inc. | | | 3,484,206 | |
| 37,019 | | | Becton, Dickinson, & Co. | | | 2,224,102 | |
| 36,881 | | | Biomet Inc. | | | 1,348,738 | |
| 87,785 | | | Boston Scientific Corp.* | | | 2,149,855 | |
| 15,545 | | | C.R. Bard Inc. | | | 1,024,726 | |
| 18,106 | | | Fisher Scientific International Inc.* | | | 1,120,037 | |
| 49,155 | | | Guidant Corp. | | | 3,182,786 | |
| 23,618 | | | Hospira Inc.* | | | 1,010,378 | |
| 179,817 | | | Medtronic Inc. | | | 10,352,065 | |
| 7,615 | | | Millipore Corp.* | | | 502,895 | |
| 19,533 | | | PerkinElmer Inc. | | | 460,198 | |
| 54,028 | | | St. Jude Medical Inc.* | | | 2,712,206 | |
| 43,218 | | | Stryker Corp. | | | 1,920,176 | |
| 23,932 | | | Thermo Electron Corp.* | | | 721,071 | |
| 17,228 | | | Waters Corp.* | | | 651,218 | |
| 36,701 | | | Zimmer Holdings Inc.* | | | 2,475,115 | |
|
| | | | Total Health Care Equipment & Supplies | | | 35,878,083 | |
|
Health Care Providers & Services — 3.2% |
| 43,070 | | | Aetna Inc. | | | 4,061,932 | |
| 30,802 | | | AmerisourceBergen Corp. | | | 1,275,203 | |
| 63,411 | | | Cardinal Health Inc. | | | 4,359,506 | |
| 66,781 | | | Caremark Rx Inc.* | | | 3,458,588 | |
| 19,142 | | | CIGNA Corp. | | | 2,138,161 | |
| 23,899 | | | Coventry Health Care Inc.* | | | 1,361,287 | |
| 22,077 | | | Express Scripts Inc.* | | | 1,850,053 | |
| 62,827 | | | HCA Inc. | | | 3,172,763 | |
| 36,791 | | | Health Management Associates Inc., Class A Shares | | | 807,930 | |
| 24,220 | | | Humana Inc.* | | | 1,315,873 | |
| 33,515 | | | IMS Health Inc. | | | 835,194 | |
| 20,009 | | | Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings* | | | 1,077,485 | |
| 11,576 | | | Manor Care Inc. | | | 460,377 | |
| 45,724 | | | McKesson Corp. | | | 2,358,901 | |
| 45,091 | | | Medco Health Solutions Inc.* | | | 2,516,078 | |
| 20,412 | | | Patterson Cos. Inc.* | | | 681,761 | |
| 24,883 | | | Quest Diagnostics Inc. | | | 1,280,977 | |
| 70,628 | | | Tenet Healthcare Corp.* | | | 541,010 | |
| 204,819 | | | UnitedHealth Group Inc. | | | 12,727,453 | |
| 97,404 | | | WellPoint Inc.* | | | 7,771,865 | |
|
| | | | Total Health Care Providers & Services | | | 54,052,397 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 57
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals — 6.4% |
| 230,920 | | | Abbott Laboratories | | $ | 9,105,176 | |
| 19,480 | | | Allergan Inc. | | | 2,103,061 | |
| 290,388 | | | Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | | | 6,673,116 | |
| 168,530 | | | Eli Lilly & Co. | | | 9,537,113 | |
| 50,603 | | | Forest Laboratories Inc.* | | | 2,058,530 | |
| 442,120 | | | Johnson & Johnson | | | 26,571,412 | |
| 36,109 | | | King Pharmaceuticals Inc.* | | | 610,964 | |
| 326,145 | | | Merck & Co. Inc. | | | 10,374,672 | |
| 32,541 | | | Mylan Laboratories Inc. | | | 649,518 | |
| 1,101,041 | | | Pfizer Inc. | | | 25,676,276 | |
| 219,075 | | | Schering-Plough Corp. | | | 4,567,714 | |
| 15,596 | | | Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc.* | | | 507,026 | |
| 199,467 | | | Wyeth | | | 9,189,445 | |
|
| | | | Total Pharmaceuticals | | | 107,624,023 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL HEALTH CARE | | | 223,340,252 | |
|
INDUSTRIALS — 11.4% |
Aerospace & Defense — 2.3% |
| 121,952 | | | Boeing Co. | | | 8,565,908 | |
| 29,803 | | | General Dynamics Corp. | | | 3,399,032 | |
| 17,931 | | | Goodrich Corp. | | | 736,964 | |
| 126,942 | | | Honeywell International Inc. | | | 4,728,590 | |
| 17,720 | | | L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. | | | 1,317,482 | |
| 53,979 | | | Lockheed Martin Corp. | | | 3,434,684 | |
| 53,052 | | | Northrop Grumman Corp. | | | 3,188,956 | |
| 67,156 | | | Raytheon Co. | | | 2,696,313 | |
| 26,278 | | | Rockwell Collins Inc. | | | 1,221,139 | |
| 152,210 | | | United Technologies Corp. | | | 8,510,061 | |
|
| | | | Total Aerospace & Defense | | | 37,799,129 | |
|
Air Freight & Logistics — 1.0% |
| 45,061 | | | FedEx Corp. | | | 4,658,856 | |
| 9,450 | | | Ryder System Inc. | | | 387,639 | |
| 164,639 | | | United Parcel Service Inc., Class B Shares | | | 12,372,621 | |
|
| | | | Total Air Freight & Logistics | | | 17,419,116 | |
|
Airlines — 0.1% |
| 103,405 | | | Southwest Airlines Co. | | | 1,698,944 | |
|
Building Products — 0.2% |
| 27,276 | | | American Standard Cos. Inc. | | | 1,089,676 | |
| 63,999 | | | Masco Corp. | | | 1,932,130 | |
|
| | | | Total Building Products | | | 3,021,806 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
58 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Commercial Services & Supplies — 0.7% |
| 31,750 | | | Allied Waste Industries Inc.* | | $ | 277,495 | |
| 16,481 | | | Avery Dennison Corp. | | | 910,905 | |
| 155,941 | | | Cendant Corp. | | | 2,689,982 | |
| 20,371 | | | Cintas Corp. | | | 838,878 | |
| 19,321 | | | Equifax Inc. | | | 734,584 | |
| 18,217 | | | Monster Worldwide Inc.* | | | 743,618 | |
| 33,990 | | | Pitney Bowes Inc. | | | 1,436,078 | |
| 31,923 | | | R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. | | | 1,092,086 | |
| 25,275 | | | Robert Half International Inc. | | | 957,670 | |
| 83,581 | | | Waste Management Inc. | | | 2,536,683 | |
|
| | | | Total Commercial Services & Supplies | | | 12,217,979 | |
|
Construction & Engineering — 0.1% |
| 12,928 | | | Fluor Corp. | | | 998,817 | |
|
Electrical Equipment — 0.5% |
| 25,188 | | | American Power Conversion Corp. | | | 554,136 | |
| 13,876 | | | Cooper Industries Ltd., Class A Shares | | | 1,012,948 | |
| 61,415 | | | Emerson Electric Co. | | | 4,587,701 | |
| 27,084 | | | Rockwell Automation Inc. | | | 1,602,289 | |
|
| | | | Total Electrical Equipment | | | 7,757,074 | |
|
Industrial Conglomerates — 4.4% |
| 113,692 | | | 3M Co. | | | 8,811,130 | |
| 1,575,122 | | | General Electric Co. | | | 55,208,026 | |
| 19,853 | | | Textron Inc. | | | 1,528,284 | |
| 301,017 | | | Tyco International Ltd. | | | 8,687,351 | |
|
| | | | Total Industrial Conglomerates | | | 74,234,791 | |
|
Machinery — 1.4% |
| 100,640 | | | Caterpillar Inc. | | | 5,813,973 | |
| 6,897 | | | Cummins Inc. | | | 618,868 | |
| 35,454 | | | Danaher Corp. | | | 1,977,624 | |
| 35,798 | | | Deere & Co. | | | 2,438,202 | |
| 30,067 | | | Dover Corp. | | | 1,217,413 | |
| 21,803 | | | Eaton Corp. | | | 1,462,763 | |
| 31,058 | | | Illinois Tool Works Inc. | | | 2,732,793 | |
| 50,090 | | | Ingersoll-Rand Co., Ltd., Class A Shares | | | 2,022,133 | |
| 13,726 | | | ITT Industries Inc. | | | 1,411,307 | |
| 9,148 | | | Navistar International Corp.* | | | 261,816 | |
| 25,534 | | | PACCAR Inc. | | | 1,767,719 | |
| 18,779 | | | Pall Corp. | | | 504,404 | |
| 17,871 | | | Parker Hannifin Corp. | | | 1,178,771 | |
|
| | | | Total Machinery | | | 23,407,786 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 59
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Road & Rail — 0.7% |
| 55,496 | | | Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. | | $ | 3,930,227 | |
| 32,140 | | | CSX Corp. | | | 1,631,748 | |
| 60,261 | | | Norfolk Southern Corp. | | | 2,701,500 | |
| 39,217 | | | Union Pacific Corp. | | | 3,157,361 | |
|
| | | | Total Road & Rail | | | 11,420,836 | |
|
Trading Companies & Distributors — 0.0% |
| 11,369 | | | W. W. Grainger Inc. | | | 808,336 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL INDUSTRIALS | | | 190,784,614 | |
|
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY — 15.1% |
Communications Equipment — 2.7% |
| 17,023 | | | ADC Telecommunications Inc.* | | | 380,294 | |
| 24,848 | | | Andrew Corp.* | | | 266,619 | |
| 62,737 | | | Avaya Inc.* | | | 669,404 | |
| 86,998 | | | Ciena Corp.* | | | 258,384 | |
| 917,511 | | | Cisco Systems Inc.* | | | 15,707,788 | |
| 30,014 | | | Comverse Technology Inc.* | | | 798,072 | |
| 227,367 | | | Corning Inc.* | | | 4,470,035 | |
| 247,313 | | | JDS Uniphase Corp.* | | | 583,659 | |
| 662,783 | | | Lucent Technologies Inc.* | | | 1,763,003 | |
| 366,750 | | | Motorola Inc. | | | 8,284,883 | |
| 242,402 | | | QUALCOMM Inc. | | | 10,442,678 | |
| 22,835 | | | Scientific-Atlanta Inc. | | | 983,503 | |
| 66,900 | | | Tellabs Inc.* | | | 729,210 | |
|
| | | | Total Communications Equipment | | | 45,337,532 | |
|
Computers & Peripherals — 3.7% |
| 125,755 | | | Apple Computer Inc.* | | | 9,040,527 | |
| 356,224 | | | Dell Inc.* | | | 10,683,158 | |
| 358,196 | | | EMC Corp.* | | | 4,878,629 | |
| 37,614 | | | Gateway Inc.* | | | 94,411 | |
| 425,701 | | | Hewlett-Packard Co. | | | 12,187,820 | |
| 237,049 | | | International Business Machines Corp. | | | 19,485,428 | |
| 17,542 | | | Lexmark International Inc., Class A Shares* | | | 786,408 | |
| 27,630 | | | NCR Corp.* | | | 937,762 | |
| 54,821 | | | Network Appliance Inc.* | | | 1,480,167 | |
| 12,105 | | | QLogic Corp.* | | | 393,533 | |
| 508,084 | | | Sun Microsystems Inc.* | | | 2,128,872 | |
|
| | | | Total Computers & Peripherals | | | 62,096,715 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
60 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Electronic Equipment & Instruments — 0.3% |
| 60,864 | | | Agilent Technologies Inc.* | | $ | 2,026,163 | |
| 25,725 | | | Jabil Circuit Inc.* | | | 954,140 | |
| 21,714 | | | Molex Inc. | | | 563,478 | |
| 76,591 | | | Sanmina-SCI Corp.* | | | 326,278 | |
| 136,778 | | | Solectron Corp.* | | | 500,607 | |
| 36,073 | | | Symbol Technologies Inc. | | | 462,456 | |
| 12,547 | | | Tektronix Inc. | | | 353,951 | |
|
| | | | Total Electronic Equipment & Instruments | | | 5,187,073 | |
|
Internet Software & Services — 0.4% |
| 186,149 | | | Yahoo! Inc.* | | | 7,293,318 | |
|
IT Services — 1.1% |
| 18,731 | | | Affiliated Computer Services Inc., Class A Shares* | | | 1,108,501 | |
| 86,356 | | | Automatic Data Processing Inc. | | | 3,962,877 | |
| 27,385 | | | Computer Sciences Corp.* | | | 1,386,777 | |
| 20,916 | | | Convergys Corp.* | | | 331,519 | |
| 76,979 | | | Electronic Data Systems Corp. | | | 1,850,575 | |
| 22 | | | Enterasys Networks Inc.* | | | 292 | |
| 114,636 | | | First Data Corp. | | | 4,930,494 | |
| 27,856 | | | Fiserv Inc.* | | | 1,205,329 | |
| 49,527 | | | Paychex Inc. | | | 1,887,969 | |
| 19,819 | | | Sabre Holdings Corp., Class A Shares | | | 477,836 | |
| 50,070 | | | Unisys Corp.* | | | 291,908 | |
|
| | | | Total IT Services | | | 17,434,077 | |
|
Office Electronics — 0.1% |
| 142,948 | | | Xerox Corp.* | | | 2,094,188 | |
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 3.2% |
| 59,320 | | | Advanced Micro Devices Inc.* | | | 1,815,192 | |
| 55,322 | | | Altera Corp.* | | | 1,025,117 | |
| 55,180 | | | Analog Devices Inc. | | | 1,979,307 | |
| 241,407 | | | Applied Materials Inc. | | | 4,330,842 | |
| 44,372 | | | Applied Micro Circuits Corp.* | | | 114,036 | |
| 42,090 | | | Broadcom Corp., Class A Shares* | | | 1,984,543 | |
| 60,023 | | | Freescale Semiconductor Inc., Class B Shares* | | | 1,510,779 | |
| 905,584 | | | Intel Corp. | | | 22,603,377 | |
| 29,277 | | | KLA-Tencor Corp. | | | 1,444,234 | |
| 45,532 | | | Linear Technology Corp. | | | 1,642,339 | |
| 58,439 | | | LSI Logic Corp.* | | | 467,512 | |
| 48,939 | | | Maxim Integrated Products Inc. | | | 1,773,549 | |
| 91,058 | | | Micron Technology Inc.* | | | 1,211,982 | |
| 50,741 | | | National Semiconductor Corp. | | | 1,318,251 | |
| 20,786 | | | Novellus Systems Inc.* | | | 501,358 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 61
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 3.2% (continued) |
| 24,987 | | | NVIDIA Corp.* | | $ | 913,525 | |
| 26,200 | | | PMC-Sierra Inc.* | | | 202,002 | |
| 28,842 | | | Teradyne Inc.* | | | 420,228 | |
| 241,311 | | | Texas Instruments Inc. | | | 7,738,844 | |
| 52,052 | | | Xilinx Inc. | | | 1,312,231 | |
|
| | | | Total Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | | | 54,309,248 | |
|
Software — 3.6% |
| 88,728 | | | Adobe Systems Inc. | | | 3,279,387 | |
| 34,026 | | | Autodesk Inc. | | | 1,461,417 | |
| 32,679 | | | BMC Software Inc.* | | | 669,593 | |
| 25,262 | | | Citrix Systems Inc.* | | | 727,040 | |
| 68,723 | | | Computer Associates International Inc. | | | 1,937,301 | |
| 57,023 | | | Compuware Corp.* | | | 511,496 | |
| 45,007 | | | Electronic Arts Inc.* | | | 2,354,316 | |
| 26,929 | | | Intuit Inc.* | | | 1,435,316 | |
| 13,121 | | | Mercury Interactive Corp.* | | | 364,633 | |
| 1,369,200 | | | Microsoft Corp. | | | 35,804,580 | |
| 57,366 | | | Novell Inc.* | | | 506,542 | |
| 560,325 | | | Oracle Corp.* | | | 6,841,568 | |
| 41,657 | | | Parametric Technology Corp.* | | | 254,108 | |
| 77,728 | | | Siebel Systems Inc. | | | 822,362 | |
| 160,544 | | | Symantec Corp.* | | | 2,809,520 | |
|
| | | | Total Software | | | 59,779,179 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | | | 253,531,330 | |
|
MATERIALS — 3.0% |
Chemicals — 1.6% |
| 33,057 | | | Air Products & Chemicals Inc. | | | 1,956,644 | |
| 11,151 | | | Ashland Inc. | | | 645,643 | |
| 143,527 | | | Dow Chemical Co. | | | 6,289,353 | |
| 136,413 | | | E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. | | | 5,797,552 | |
| 12,065 | | | Eastman Chemical Co. | | | 622,433 | |
| 27,225 | | | Ecolab Inc. | | | 987,451 | |
| 18,116 | | | Engelhard Corp. | | | 546,197 | |
| 17,474 | | | Hercules Inc.* | | | 197,456 | |
| 12,216 | | | International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. | | | 409,236 | |
| 39,917 | | | Monsanto Co. | | | 3,094,765 | |
| 25,275 | | | PPG Industries Inc. | | | 1,463,423 | |
| 47,900 | | | Praxair Inc. | | | 2,536,784 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
62 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Chemicals — 1.6% (continued) |
| 21,643 | | | Rohm & Haas Co. | | $ | 1,047,954 | |
| 10,123 | | | Sigma-Aldrich Corp. | | | 640,685 | |
|
| | | | Total Chemicals | | | 26,235,576 | |
|
Construction Materials — 0.1% |
| 15,292 | | | Vulcan Materials Co. | | | 1,036,033 | |
|
Containers & Packaging — 0.2% |
| 16,143 | | | Ball Corp. | | | 641,200 | |
| 15,812 | | | Bemis Co. Inc. | | | 440,680 | |
| 22,467 | | | Pactiv Corp.* | | | 494,274 | |
| 12,256 | | | Sealed Air Corp.* | | | 688,420 | |
| 16,937 | | | Temple-Inland Inc. | | | 759,625 | |
|
| | | | Total Containers & Packaging | | | 3,024,199 | |
|
Metals & Mining — 0.8% |
| 129,865 | | | Alcoa Inc. | | | 3,840,108 | |
| 12,501 | | | Allegheny Technologies Inc. | | | 451,036 | |
| 26,306 | | | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc., Class B Shares | | | 1,415,263 | |
| 66,180 | | | Newmont Mining Corp. | | | 3,534,012 | |
| 23,168 | | | Nucor Corp. | | | 1,545,769 | |
| 14,391 | | | Phelps Dodge Corp. | | | 2,070,433 | |
| 17,099 | | | United States Steel Corp. | | | 821,949 | |
|
| | | | Total Metals & Mining | | | 13,678,570 | |
|
Paper & Forest Products — 0.3% |
| 72,883 | | | International Paper Co. | | | 2,449,598 | |
| 16,598 | | | Louisiana-Pacific Corp. | | | 455,947 | |
| 27,365 | | | MeadWestvaco Corp. | | | 767,041 | |
| 36,280 | | | Weyerhaeuser Co. | | | 2,406,815 | |
|
| | | | Total Paper & Forest Products | | | 6,079,401 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL MATERIALS | | | 50,053,779 | |
|
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 3.0% |
Diversified Telecommunication Services — 2.2% |
| 272,113 | | | BellSouth Corp. | | | 7,374,262 | |
| 19,193 | | | CenturyTel Inc. | | | 636,440 | |
| 50,425 | | | Citizens Communications Co. | | | 616,698 | |
| 227,547 | | | Qwest Communications International Inc.* | | | 1,285,640 | |
| 584,100 | | | SBC Communications Inc. | | | 14,304,609 | |
| 411,051 | | | Verizon Communications Inc. | | | 12,380,856 | |
|
| | | | Total Diversified Telecommunication Services | | | 36,598,505 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 63
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services — 0.8% |
| 56,785 | | | ALLTEL Corp. | | $ | 3,583,134 | |
| 435,848 | | | Sprint Nextel Corp. | | | 10,181,409 | |
|
| | | | Total Wireless Telecommunication Services | | | 13,764,543 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES | | | 50,363,048 | |
|
UTILITIES — 3.3% |
Electric Utilities — 1.6% |
| 23,941 | | | Allegheny Energy Inc.* | | | 757,733 | |
| 58,327 | | | American Electric Power Co. Inc. | | | 2,163,348 | |
| 29,637 | | | Cinergy Corp. | | | 1,258,387 | |
| 48,533 | | | Edison International | | | 2,116,524 | |
| 30,761 | | | Entergy Corp. | | | 2,111,743 | |
| 99,642 | | | Exelon Corp. | | | 5,294,976 | |
| 49,111 | | | FirstEnergy Corp. | | | 2,405,948 | |
| 58,361 | | | FPL Group Inc. | | | 2,425,483 | |
| 14,615 | | | Pinnacle West Capital Corp. | | | 604,330 | |
| 56,593 | | | PPL Corp. | | | 1,663,834 | |
| 37,514 | | | Progress Energy Inc. | | | 1,647,615 | |
| 110,850 | | | Southern Co. | | | 3,827,651 | |
|
| | | | Total Electric Utilities | | | 26,277,572 | |
|
Gas Utilities — 0.0% |
| 6,595 | | | Nicor Inc. | | | 259,249 | |
| 5,883 | | | Peoples Energy Corp. | | | 206,317 | |
|
| | | | Total Gas Utilities | | | 465,566 | |
|
Independent Power Producers & Energy Traders — 0.6% |
| 96,657 | | | AES Corp.* | | | 1,530,080 | |
| 82,589 | | | Calpine Corp.* | | | 17,179 | |
| 26,565 | | | Constellation Energy Group Inc. | | | 1,530,144 | |
| 137,513 | | | Duke Energy Corp. | | | 3,774,732 | |
| 46,472 | | | Dynegy Inc., Class A Shares* | | | 224,924 | |
| 71,287 | | | TXU Corp. | | | 3,577,895 | |
|
| | | | Total Independent Power Producers & Energy Traders | | | 10,654,954 | |
|
Multi-Utilities — 1.1% |
| 30,339 | | | Ameren Corp. | | | 1,554,570 | |
| 46,155 | | | CenterPoint Energy Inc. | | | 593,092 | |
| 32,195 | | | CMS Energy Corp.* | | | 467,149 | |
| 36,396 | | | Consolidated Edison Inc. | | | 1,686,227 | |
| 50,604 | | | Dominion Resources Inc. | | | 3,906,629 | |
| 26,233 | | | DTE Energy Co. | | | 1,133,003 | |
| 26,026 | | | KeySpan Corp. | | | 928,868 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
64 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Multi-Utilities — 1.1% (continued) |
| 40,377 | | | NiSource Inc. | | $ | 842,264 | |
| 50,914 | | | PG&E Corp. | | | 1,889,927 | |
| 35,642 | | | Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. | | | 2,315,661 | |
| 38,080 | | | Sempra Energy | | | 1,707,507 | |
| 30,449 | | | TECO Energy Inc. | | | 523,114 | |
| 59,545 | | | Xcel Energy Inc. | | | 1,099,201 | |
|
| | | | Total Multi-Utilities | | | 18,647,212 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL UTILITIES | | | 56,045,304 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL INVESTMENTS BEFORE SHORT-TERM INVESTMENT (Cost — $1,578,763,423) | | | 1,680,327,197 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | |
Amount | | | | |
|
|
|
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENT — 0.0% |
U.S. Government Obligation — 0.0% |
$ | 500,000 | | | U.S. Treasury Bills, 3.820% due 3/16/06 (b) (Cost — $496,115) | | | 496,099 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL INVESTMENTS — 100.1% (Cost — $1,579,259,538#) | | | 1,680,823,296 | |
| | | | Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets — (0.1)% | | | (2,505,751 | ) |
|
| | | | TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | | $ | 1,678,317,545 | |
|
| |
* | Non-income producing security. |
| |
(a) | Citigroup Inc. was the parent company of the Travelers Investment Management Company, the Fund’s investment advisor, as of December 31, 2005. |
|
(b) | Yield to maturity on date of purchase, except in the case of Variable Rate Demand Obligations (“VRDO”), whose yields are determined on the date of the last interest change. |
| |
# | Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is $1,586,514,009. |
| |
| Abbreviation used in this schedule: |
|
| MBIA — Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 65
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) |
SALOMON BROTHERS VARIABLE GROWTH & INCOME FUND
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
COMMON STOCKS — 99.7% |
CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY — 10.1% |
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 2.5% |
| 4,840 | | | McDonald’s Corp. | | $ | 163,205 | |
| 1,700 | | | Station Casinos Inc. | | | 115,260 | |
|
| | | | Total Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | | | 278,465 | |
|
Household Durables — 1.0% |
| 4,650 | | | Newell Rubbermaid Inc. | | | 110,577 | |
|
Media — 3.6% |
| 3,530 | | | EchoStar Communications Corp., Class A Shares* | | | 95,910 | |
| 9,400 | | | News Corp., Class B Shares | | | 156,134 | |
| 8,430 | | | Time Warner Inc. | | | 147,019 | |
|
| | | | Total Media | | | 399,063 | |
|
Specialty Retail — 3.0% |
| 5,180 | | | Best Buy Co. Inc. | | | 225,226 | |
| 4,750 | | | Staples Inc. | | | 107,873 | |
|
| | | | Total Specialty Retail | | | 333,099 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY | | | 1,121,204 | |
|
CONSUMER STAPLES — 10.9% |
Beverages — 2.1% |
| 3,910 | | | PepsiCo Inc. | | | 231,003 | |
|
Food & Staples Retailing — 2.4% |
| 5,850 | | | Wal-Mart Stores Inc. | | | 273,780 | |
|
Food Products — 3.8% |
| 3,550 | | | Kellogg Co. | | | 153,431 | |
| 3,650 | | | McCormick & Co. Inc., Non Voting Shares | | | 112,858 | |
| 8,040 | | | Sara Lee Corp. | | | 151,956 | |
|
| | | | Total Food Products | | | 418,245 | |
|
Household Products — 1.8% |
| 500 | | | Kimberly-Clark Corp. | | | 29,825 | |
| 2,960 | | | Procter & Gamble Co. | | | 171,325 | |
|
| | | | Total Household Products | | | 201,150 | |
|
Tobacco — 0.8% |
| 1,170 | | | Altria Group Inc. | | | 87,422 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL CONSUMER STAPLES | | | 1,211,600 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
66 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
ENERGY — 9.4% |
Energy Equipment & Services — 1.7% |
| 1,890 | | | ENSCO International Inc. | | $ | 83,822 | |
| 2,230 | | | GlobalSantaFe Corp. | | | 107,374 | |
|
| | | | Total Energy Equipment & Services | | | 191,196 | |
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 7.7% |
| 1,470 | | | Burlington Resources Inc. | | | 126,714 | |
| 4,680 | | | Exxon Mobil Corp. | | | 262,876 | |
| 2,950 | | | Nexen Inc. | | | 140,508 | |
| 1,350 | | | Suncor Energy Inc. | | | 85,225 | |
| 1,840 | | | Total SA, Sponsored ADR | | | 232,576 | |
|
| | | | Total Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | | | 847,899 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL ENERGY | | | 1,039,095 | |
|
FINANCIALS — 20.2% |
Capital Markets — 3.6% |
| 1,520 | | | Goldman Sachs Group Inc. | | | 194,119 | |
| 3,020 | | | Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. | | | 204,545 | |
|
| | | | Total Capital Markets | | | 398,664 | |
|
Commercial Banks — 5.7% |
| 4,846 | | | Bank of America Corp. | | | 223,643 | |
| 2,390 | | | Wachovia Corp. | | | 126,335 | |
| 4,550 | | | Wells Fargo & Co. | | | 285,877 | |
|
| | | | Total Commercial Banks | | | 635,855 | |
|
Consumer Finance — 3.1% |
| 3,130 | | | American Express Co. | | | 161,070 | |
| 2,070 | | | Capital One Financial Corp. | | | 178,848 | |
|
| | | | Total Consumer Finance | | | 339,918 | |
|
Diversified Financial Services — 2.2% |
| 6,205 | | | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | | 246,276 | |
|
Insurance — 4.4% |
| 2,420 | | | AFLAC Inc. | | | 112,336 | |
| 2,500 | | | American International Group Inc. | | | 170,575 | |
| 1 | | | Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Class A Shares* | | | 88,620 | |
| 1,180 | | | Chubb Corp. | | | 115,227 | |
|
| | | | Total Insurance | | | 486,758 | |
|
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance — 1.2% |
| 1,950 | | | Golden West Financial Corp. | | | 128,700 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL FINANCIALS | | | 2,236,171 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 67
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
HEALTH CARE — 11.3% |
Biotechnology — 1.6% |
| 2,318 | | | Amgen Inc.* | | $ | 182,798 | |
|
Health Care Providers & Services — 4.5% |
| 2,160 | | | Coventry Health Care Inc.* | | | 123,034 | |
| 3,260 | | | UnitedHealth Group Inc. | | | 202,576 | |
| 2,200 | | | WellPoint Inc.* | | | 175,538 | |
|
| | | | Total Health Care Providers & Services | | | 501,148 | |
|
Pharmaceuticals — 5.2% |
| 2,970 | | | Pfizer Inc. | | | 69,260 | |
| 4,300 | | | Sanofi-Aventis, ADR | | | 188,770 | |
| 1,860 | | | Sepracor Inc.* | | | 95,976 | |
| 5,090 | | | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Sponsored ADR | | | 218,921 | |
|
| | | | Total Pharmaceuticals | | | 572,927 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL HEALTH CARE | | | 1,256,873 | |
|
INDUSTRIALS — 11.6% |
Aerospace & Defense — 4.6% |
| 4,860 | | | Boeing Co. | | | 341,366 | |
| 4,220 | | | Raytheon Co. | | | 169,433 | |
|
| | | | Total Aerospace & Defense | | | 510,799 | |
|
Building Products — 2.3% |
| 2,830 | | | American Standard Cos. Inc. | | | 113,059 | |
| 4,700 | | | Masco Corp. | | | 141,893 | |
|
| | | | Total Building Products | | | 254,952 | |
|
Industrial Conglomerates — 4.7% |
| 11,930 | | | General Electric Co. | | | 418,146 | |
| 1,350 | | | Textron Inc. | | | 103,923 | |
|
| | | | Total Industrial Conglomerates | | | 522,069 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL INDUSTRIALS | | | 1,287,820 | |
|
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY — 15.6% |
Communications Equipment — 1.5% |
| 5,246 | | | ADC Telecommunications Inc.* | | | 117,196 | |
| 2,300 | | | Motorola Inc. | | | 51,957 | |
|
| | | | Total Communications Equipment | | | 169,153 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
68 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Computers & Peripherals — 1.8% |
| 2,330 | | | Dell Inc.* | | $ | 69,877 | |
| 1,590 | | | International Business Machines Corp. | | | 130,698 | |
|
| | | | Total Computers & Peripherals | | | 200,575 | |
|
Electronic Equipment & Instruments — 0.3% |
| 1,670 | | | Dolby Laboratories Inc., Class A Shares* | | | 28,473 | |
|
Internet Software & Services — 1.0% |
| 2,830 | | | Yahoo! Inc.* | | | 110,879 | |
|
IT Services — 1.1% |
| 3,220 | | | Paychex Inc. | | | 122,746 | |
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 3.7% |
| 3,430 | | | Applied Materials Inc. | | | 61,534 | |
| 4,640 | | | ASML Holding NV, NY Registered Shares* | | | 93,171 | |
| 8,090 | | | Intel Corp. | | | 201,927 | |
| 1,600 | | | Texas Instruments Inc. | | | 51,312 | |
|
| | | | Total Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | | | 407,944 | |
|
Software — 6.2% |
| 3,200 | | | Adobe Systems Inc. | | | 118,272 | |
| 1,640 | | | Cognos Inc.* | | | 56,925 | |
| 2,020 | | | Electronic Arts Inc.* | | | 105,666 | |
| 15,680 | | | Microsoft Corp. | | | 410,032 | |
|
| | | | Total Software | | | 690,895 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | | | 1,730,665 | |
|
MATERIALS — 6.0% |
Chemicals — 2.3% |
| 3,180 | | | E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. | | | 135,150 | |
| 3,290 | | | Ecolab Inc. | | | 119,328 | |
|
| | | | Total Chemicals | | | 254,478 | |
|
Metals & Mining — 3.7% |
| 10,390 | | | Barrick Gold Corp. | | | 289,570 | |
| 5,400 | | | Placer Dome Inc. | | | 123,822 | |
|
| | | | Total Metals & Mining | | | 413,392 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL MATERIALS | | | 667,870 | |
|
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 3.4% |
Wireless Telecommunication Services — 3.4% |
| 1,780 | | | ALLTEL Corp. | | | 112,318 | |
| 11,102 | | | Sprint Nextel Corp. | | | 259,343 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES | | | 371,661 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 69
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
UTILITIES — 1.2% | | | | |
Multi-Utilities — 1.2% | | | | |
| 3,020 | | | Sempra Energy | | $ | 135,417 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL INVESTMENTS — 99.7% (Cost — $8,906,238#) | | | 11,058,376 | |
| | | | Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities — 0.3% | | | 37,805 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | | $ | 11,096,181 | |
|
| |
* | Non-income producing security. |
| |
# | Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is $8,990,039. |
| |
| Abbreviation used in this schedule: |
|
| ADR — American Depositary Receipt |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
70 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) |
SALOMON BROTHERS VARIABLE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUND
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
COMMON STOCKS — 94.5% |
CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY — 14.7% |
Media — 14.5% |
| 53,820 | | | Cablevision Systems Corp., New York Group, Class A Shares* | | $ | 1,263,155 | |
| 4,117 | | | Comcast Corp., Class A Shares* | | | 106,877 | |
| 93,525 | | | Comcast Corp., Special Class A Shares* | | | 2,402,657 | |
| 11,540 | | | Discovery Holding Co., Class A Shares* | | | 174,831 | |
| 2,730 | | | Liberty Global Inc., Class A Shares* | | | 61,425 | |
| 2,730 | | | Liberty Global Inc., Series C Shares* | | | 57,876 | |
| 125,400 | | | Liberty Media Corp., Class A Shares* | | | 986,898 | |
| 145,200 | | | Time Warner Inc. | | | 2,532,288 | |
| 9,653 | | | Viacom Inc., Class B Shares | | | 314,688 | |
| 38,000 | | | Walt Disney Co. | | | 910,860 | |
| 5,600 | | | World Wrestling Entertainment Inc. | | | 82,208 | |
|
| | | | Total Media | | | 8,893,763 | |
|
Specialty Retail — 0.2% |
| 9,700 | | | Charming Shoppes, Inc.* | | | 128,040 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY | | | 9,021,803 | |
|
ENERGY — 11.9% |
Energy Equipment & Services — 6.9% |
| 7,600 | | | Core Laboratories NV* | | | 283,936 | |
| 27,650 | | | Grant Prideco Inc.* | | | 1,219,918 | |
| 74,500 | | | Weatherford International Ltd.* | | | 2,696,900 | |
|
| | | | Total Energy Equipment & Services | | | 4,200,754 | |
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 5.0% |
| 32,300 | | | Anadarko Petroleum Corp. | | | 3,060,425 | |
| 255 | | | Bill Barrett Corp.* | | | 9,845 | |
|
| | | | Total Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | | | 3,070,270 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL ENERGY | | | 7,271,024 | |
|
EXCHANGE TRADED FUND — 1.7% |
| 26,600 | | | Nasdaq-100 Index Tracking Stock | | | 1,075,172 | |
|
FINANCIALS — 10.7% |
Capital Markets — 9.8% |
| 3,900 | | | Cohen & Steers Inc. | | | 72,657 | |
| 24,550 | | | Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. | | | 3,146,574 | |
| 41,800 | | | Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. | | | 2,831,114 | |
|
| | | | Total Capital Markets | | | 6,050,345 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 71
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services — 0.4% |
| 4,500 | | | CIT Group Inc. | | $ | 233,010 | |
|
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance — 0.5% |
| 17,849 | | | New York Community Bancorp Inc. | | | 294,865 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL FINANCIALS | | | 6,578,220 | |
|
HEALTH CARE — 33.6% |
Biotechnology — 20.4% |
| 6,420 | | | Alkermes Inc.* | | | 122,750 | |
| 36,900 | | | Amgen Inc.* | | | 2,909,934 | |
| 54,850 | | | Biogen Idec Inc.* | | | 2,486,351 | |
| 2,600 | | | CancerVax Corp.* | | | 3,588 | |
| 48,175 | | | Chiron Corp.* | | | 2,141,861 | |
| 5,300 | | | Genentech Inc.* | | | 490,250 | |
| 39,448 | | | Genzyme Corp.* | | | 2,792,129 | |
| 28,428 | | | ImClone Systems Inc.* | | | 973,375 | |
| 8,200 | | | Isis Pharmaceuticals Inc.* | | | 42,968 | |
| 33,546 | | | Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc.* | | | 325,396 | |
| 4,800 | | | Nabi Biopharmaceuticals* | | | 16,224 | |
| 4,860 | | | Nanogen Inc.* | | | 12,733 | |
| 6,410 | | | Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.* | | | 177,365 | |
| 1,265 | | | ViaCell Inc.* | | | 7,109 | |
|
| | | | Total Biotechnology | | | 12,502,033 | |
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies — 0.3% |
| 3,400 | | | Biosite Inc.* | | | 191,386 | |
|
Health Care Providers & Services — 5.1% |
| 50,520 | | | UnitedHealth Group Inc. | | | 3,139,313 | |
|
Pharmaceuticals — 7.8% |
| 73,080 | | | Forest Laboratories Inc.* | | | 2,972,894 | |
| 13,100 | | | Johnson & Johnson | | | 787,310 | |
| 24,900 | | | King Pharmaceuticals Inc.* | | | 421,308 | |
| 3,500 | | | Pfizer Inc. | | | 81,620 | |
| 6,442 | | | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Sponsored ADR | | | 277,071 | |
| 14,000 | | | Valeant Pharmaceuticals International | | | 253,120 | |
|
| | | | Total Pharmaceuticals | | | 4,793,323 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL HEALTH CARE | | | 20,626,055 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
72 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
INDUSTRIALS — 7.7% |
Aerospace & Defense — 2.9% |
| 23,600 | | | L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. | | $ | 1,754,660 | |
|
Industrial Conglomerates — 3.7% |
| 78,634 | | | Tyco International Ltd. | | | 2,269,377 | |
|
Machinery — 1.1% |
| 25,000 | | | Pall Corp. | | | 671,500 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL INDUSTRIALS | | | 4,695,537 | |
|
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY — 14.1% |
Communications Equipment — 2.5% |
| 14,700 | | | C-COR Inc.* | | | 71,442 | |
| 51,600 | | | Motorola Inc. | | | 1,165,644 | |
| 16,400 | | | Nokia Oyj, Sponsored ADR | | | 300,120 | |
|
| | | | Total Communications Equipment | | | 1,537,206 | |
|
Computers & Peripherals — 2.9% |
| 3,500 | | | LaserCard Corp.* | | | 52,465 | |
| 48,162 | | | Maxtor Corp.* | | | 334,244 | |
| 31,500 | | | Quantum Corp.* | | | 96,075 | |
| 20,100 | | | SanDisk Corp.* | | | 1,262,682 | |
|
| | | | Total Computers & Peripherals | | | 1,745,466 | |
|
Electronic Equipment & Instruments — 0.2% |
| 5,750 | | | Excel Technology Inc.* | | | 136,735 | |
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 7.4% |
| 22,000 | | | Broadcom Corp., Class A Shares* | | | 1,037,300 | |
| 6,500 | | | Cirrus Logic Inc.* | | | 43,420 | |
| 8,400 | | | Cree Inc.* | | | 212,016 | |
| 6,700 | | | DSP Group Inc.* | | | 167,902 | |
| 4,173 | | | Freescale Semiconductor Inc., Class B Shares* | | | 105,035 | |
| 26,725 | | | Intel Corp. | | | 667,056 | |
| 132,555 | | | Micron Technology Inc.* | | | 1,764,307 | |
| 17,700 | | | RF Micro Devices Inc.* | | | 95,757 | |
| 5,400 | | | Standard Microsystems Corp.* | | | 154,926 | |
| 17,600 | | | Teradyne Inc.* | | | 256,432 | |
|
| | | | Total Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | | | 4,504,151 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 73
| |
| Schedule of Investments (December 31, 2005) (continued) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares | | Security | | Value |
|
|
|
Software — 1.1% |
| 5,800 | | | Advent Software Inc.* | | $ | 167,678 | |
| 8,800 | | | Autodesk Inc. | | | 377,960 | |
| 3,800 | | | Microsoft Corp. | | | 99,370 | |
| 4,300 | | | RSA Security Inc.* | | | 48,289 | |
|
| | | | Total Software | | | 693,297 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | | | 8,616,855 | |
|
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.1% |
Diversified Telecommunication Services — 0.1% |
| 2,416 | | | AT&T Inc. | | | 59,168 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL INVESTMENTS BEFORE SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS (Cost — $50,577,045) | | | 57,943,834 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Face | | | | |
Amount | | | | |
|
|
|
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS — 5.6% |
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS — 5.6% |
$ | 1,409,000 | | | Interest in $577,312,000 joint tri-party repurchase agreement dated 12/30/05 with Morgan Stanley, 4.250% due 1/3/06; Proceeds at maturity — $1,409,665; (Fully collateralized by various U.S. government agency obligations, 0.000% to 6.300% due 2/5/07 to 10/6/25; Market Value — $1,452,102) | | | 1,409,000 | |
| 2,000,000 | | | Interest in $599,979,000 joint tri-party repurchase agreement dated 12/30/05 with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 4.250% due 1/3/06; Proceeds at maturity — $2,000,944; (Fully collateralized by various U.S. Treasury obligations, 0.000% to 4.500% due 1/5/06 to 11/15/15; Market value — $2,040,014) | | | 2,000,000 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS (Cost — $3,409,000) | | | 3,409,000 | |
|
| | | | TOTAL INVESTMENTS — 100.1% (Cost — $53,986,045#) | | | 61,352,834 | |
|
| | | | Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets — (0.1)% | | | (48,566 | ) |
|
| | | | TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | | $ | 61,304,268 | |
|
| |
* | Non-income producing security. |
| |
# | Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is $53,989,800. |
| |
| Abbreviation used in this schedule: |
|
| ADR — American Depositary Receipt |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
74 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Bond Ratings (unaudited)
The definitions of the applicable rating symbols are set forth below:
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Service (“Standard & Poor’s”) — Ratings from “AA” to “CCC” may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standings within the major rating categories.
| | | | |
AAA | | — | | Bonds rated “AAA” have the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poor’s. Capacity to pay interest and repay principal is extremely strong. |
AA | | — | | Bonds rated “AA” have a very strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal and differs from the highest rated issue only in a small degree. |
A | | — | | Bonds rated “A” have a strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal although it is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than debt in higher rated categories. |
BBB | | — | | Bonds rated “BBB” are regarded as having an adequate capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Whereas they normally exhibit adequate protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay principal for debt in this category than in higher rated categories. |
BB, B, CCC, CC and C | | — | | Bonds rated “BB” “B”, “CCC”, “CC” and “C” are regarded, on balance, as predominantly speculative with respect to capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligation. “BB” represents the lowest degree of speculation and “C” the highest degree of speculation. While such bonds will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these are outweighed by large uncertainties or major risk exposures to adverse conditions. |
D | | — | | Bonds rated “D” are in default and payment of interest and/or repayment of principal is in arrears. |
Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) — Numerical modifiers 1, 2 and 3 may be applied to each generic rating from “Aa” to “Caa,” where 1 is the highest and 3 the lowest ranking within its generic category. |
Aaa | | — | | Bonds rated “Aaa” are judged to be of the best quality. They carry the smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as “gilt edge.” Interest payments are protected by a large or by an exceptionally stable margin and principal is secure. While the various protective elements are likely to change, such changes as can be visualized are most unlikely to impair the fundamentally strong position of such issues. |
Aa | | — | | Bonds rated “Aa” are judged to be of high quality by all standards. Together with the “Aaa” group they comprise what are generally known as high grade bonds. They are rated lower than the best bonds because margins of protection may not be as large in “Aaa” securities or fluctuation of protective elements may be of greater amplitude or there may be other elements present which make the long-term risks appear somewhat larger than in “Aaa” securities. |
A | | — | | Bonds rated “A” possess many favorable investment attributes and are to be considered as upper medium grade obligations. Factors giving security to principal and interest are considered adequate but elements may be present which suggest a susceptibility to impairment some time in the future. |
Baa | | — | | Bonds rated “Baa” are considered as medium grade obligations, i.e., they are neither highly protected nor poorly secured. Interest payments and principal security appear adequate for the present but certain protective elements may be lacking or may be characteristically unreliable over any great length of time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics and in fact have speculative characteristics as well. |
Ba | | — | | Bonds rated “Ba” are judged to have speculative elements; their future cannot be considered as well assured. Often the protection of interest and principal payments may be very moderate and thereby not well safeguarded during both good and bad times over the future. Uncertainly of position characterizes bonds in this class. |
B | | — | | Bonds that are rated “B” generally lack characteristics of desirable investments. Assurance of interest and principal payments or of maintenance of other terms of the contract over any long period of time may be small. |
Caa | | — | | Bonds rated “Caa” are of poor standing. These issues may be in default, or present elements of danger may exist with respect to principal or interest. |
Ca | | — | | Bonds rated “Ca” represent obligations which are speculative in a high degree. Such Issues are often in default or have other marked short-comings. |
NR | | — | | Indicates that the bond is not rated by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s. |
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 75
| |
| Statements of Assets and Liabilities (December 31, 2005) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Salomon | | Salomon |
| | | | | | Brothers | | Brothers |
| | | | | | Variable | | Variable |
| | Diversified Strategic | | Equity Index | | Growth & | | Aggressive |
| | Income Portfolio | | Portfolio | | Income Fund | | Growth Fund |
|
|
|
ASSETS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investments, at cost | | $ | 88,082,431 | | | $ | 1,579,259,538 | | | $ | 8,906,238 | | | $ | 50,577,045 | |
| Repurchase agreements, at cost | | | 41,675,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,409,000 | |
| Foreign currency, at cost | | | 39,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
|
| Investments, at value | | $ | 87,744,590 | | | $ | 1,680,823,296 | | | $ | 11,058,376 | | | $ | 57,943,834 | |
| Repurchase agreements, at value | | | 41,675,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,409,000 | |
| Foreign currency, at value | | | 34,250 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Cash | | | 134 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 780 | |
| Dividends and interest receivable | | | 833,770 | | | | 2,221,757 | | | | 13,708 | | | | 26,130 | |
| Deposits with brokers for open futures contracts | | | 16,220 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | — | | | | 492,217 | | | | 226 | | | | 14,078 | |
| Receivable for securities sold | | | — | | | | 113,197 | | | | 89,835 | | | | — | |
| Prepaid expenses | | | 15,515 | | | | 23,902 | | | | 757 | | | | 394 | |
|
Total Assets | | | 130,319,479 | | | | 1,683,674,369 | | | | 11,162,902 | | | | 61,394,216 | |
|
LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Payable for securities purchased | | | 40,421,297 | | | | 2,021,108 | | | | 24,642 | | | | — | |
| Payable for Fund shares repurchased | | | 260,397 | | | | 2,270,726 | | | | 10 | | | | 24,788 | |
| Investment advisory fee payable | | | 49,494 | | | | 361,466 | | | | 6,243 | | | | 38,994 | |
| Due to custodian | | | — | | | | 282,743 | | | | 18,471 | | | | — | |
| Distribution fees payable (Notes 2 and 4) | | | — | | | | 26,062 | | | | — | | | | 3,098 | |
| Administration fee payable | | | — | | | | 86,752 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Deferred dollar roll income | | | 13,715 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Payable to broker — variation margin on open futures contracts | | | 4,281 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Deferred compensation payable | | | 2,773 | | | | 3,063 | | | | 2,292 | | | | 1,981 | |
| Transfer agent fees payable | | | 976 | | | | 1,719 | | | | 12 | | | | 137 | |
| Trustees’ fees payable | | | 56 | | | | 26 | | | | — | | | | 116 | |
| Accrued expenses | | | 44,977 | | | | 303,159 | | | | 15,051 | | | | 20,834 | |
|
| Total Liabilities | | | 40,797,966 | | | | 5,356,824 | | | | 66,721 | | | | 89,948 | |
|
Total Net Assets | | $ | 89,521,513 | | | $ | 1,678,317,545 | | | $ | 11,096,181 | | | $ | 61,304,268 | |
|
NET ASSETS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Par value (Note 6) | | $ | 9,931 | | | $ | 55,240 | | | $ | 2,187 | | | $ | 2,641 | |
| Paid-in capital in excess of par value | | | 96,998,514 | | | | 1,591,717,537 | | | | 9,662,321 | | | | 54,518,178 | |
| Undistributed (overdistributed) net investment income | | | (2,773 | ) | | | 114,615 | | | | (2,292 | ) | | | — | |
| Accumulated net investment loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,981 | ) |
| Accumulated net realized loss on investments, futures contracts and foreign currencies | | | (7,159,475 | ) | | | (15,133,605 | ) | | | (718,173 | ) | | | (581,359 | ) |
| Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, futures contracts and foreign currencies | | | (324,684 | ) | | | 101,563,758 | | | | 2,152,138 | | | | 7,366,789 | |
|
Total Net Assets | | $ | 89,521,513 | | | $ | 1,678,317,545 | | | $ | 11,096,181 | | | $ | 61,304,268 | |
|
Shares Outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class I shares | | | 9,931,070 | | | | 47,549,158 | | | | 2,186,650 | | | | 1,423,968 | |
|
| Class II shares | | | — | | | | 7,690,661 | | | | — | | | | 1,216,924 | |
|
Net Asset Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class I shares | | | $9.01 | | | | $30.38 | | | | $5.07 | | | | $23.33 | |
|
| Class II shares | | | — | | | | $30.40 | | | | — | | | | $23.08 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
76 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Statements of Operations (For the year ended December 31, 2005) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Salomon | | Salomon |
| | | | | | Brothers | | Brothers |
| | | | | | Variable | | Variable |
| | Diversified Strategic | | Equity Index | | Growth & | | Aggressive |
| | Income Portfolio | | Portfolio | | Income Fund | | Growth Fund |
|
|
|
INVESTMENT INCOME: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends | | $ | 4,733 | | | $ | 30,095,878 | | | $ | 166,199 | | | $ | 217,755 | |
| Interest | | | 5,357,517 | | | | 543,325 | | | | 5,700 | | | | 123,614 | |
| Less: Foreign taxes withheld | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,251 | ) | | | (1,053 | ) |
|
| Total Investment Income | | | 5,362,250 | | | | 30,639,203 | | | | 169,648 | | | | 340,316 | |
|
EXPENSES: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investment advisory fee (Note 2) | | | 443,690 | | | | 4,125,841 | | | | 52,282 | | | | 312,648 | |
| Administration fees (Note 2) | | | 175,198 | | | | 990,202 | | | | 20,461 | | | | 86,456 | |
| Custody fees | | | 55,376 | | | | 92,649 | | | | 18,706 | | | | 15,855 | |
| Audit and tax | | | 16,218 | | | | 22,567 | | | | 14,105 | | | | 15,330 | |
| Legal fees | | | 13,988 | | | | 6,604 | | | | 8,114 | | | | 15,147 | |
| Shareholder reports (Note 4) | | | 11,210 | | | | 169,402 | | | | 12,216 | | | | 16,080 | |
| Insurance | | | 5,493 | | | | 16,493 | | | | 1,423 | | | | 2,737 | |
| Transfer agent fees (Notes 2 and 4) | | | 5,030 | | | | 10,015 | | | | 728 | | | | 169 | |
| Trustees’ fees | | | 3,172 | | | | 35,820 | | | | 1,665 | | | | 2,546 | |
| Distribution fees (Notes 2 and 4) | | | — | | | | 578,430 | | | | — | | | | 59,904 | |
| License fee | | | — | | | | 165,034 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Miscellaneous expenses | | | 2,355 | | | | 59,669 | | | | 1,099 | | | | 4,203 | |
|
| Total Expenses | | | 731,730 | | | | 6,272,726 | | | | 130,799 | | | | 531,075 | |
|
Net Investment Income (Loss) | | | 4,630,520 | | | | 24,366,477 | | | | 38,849 | | | | (190,759 | ) |
|
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS, FUTURES CONTRACTS AND FOREIGN CURRENCIES (NOTES 1 AND 3): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Realized Gain (Loss) From: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Investments | | | 1,399,450 | | | | 17,788,667 | | | | 371,234 | | | | 18,120 | |
| | Futures contracts | | | (94,986 | ) | | | (585,775 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | Foreign currencies | | | 617,933 | | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | — | |
|
| Net Realized Gain | | | 1,922,397 | | | | 17,202,892 | | | | 371,237 | | | | 18,120 | |
|
| Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation From: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Investments | | | (4,113,649 | ) | | | 32,557,471 | | | | (22,620 | ) | | | 5,564,067 | |
| | Futures contracts | | | (13,228 | ) | | | (671,094 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | Foreign currencies | | | 37,661 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
|
| Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation | | | (4,089,216 | ) | | | 31,886,377 | | | | (22,620 | ) | | | 5,564,067 | |
|
Net Gain (Loss) on Investments, Futures Contracts and Foreign Currencies | | | (2,166,819 | ) | | | 49,089,269 | | | | 348,617 | | | | 5,582,187 | |
|
Increase in Net Assets From Operations | | $ | 2,463,701 | | | $ | 73,455,746 | | | $ | 387,466 | | | $ | 5,391,428 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 77
| |
| Statements of Changes in Net Assets (For the years ended December 31,) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Diversified Strategic |
| | Income Portfolio |
| |
|
| | 2005 | | 2004 |
|
|
|
OPERATIONS: | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | $ | 4,630,520 | | | $ | 5,004,061 | |
| Net realized gain | | | 1,922,397 | | | | 1,766,018 | |
| Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | (4,089,216 | ) | | | (424,571 | ) |
|
| Increase in Net Assets From Operations | | | 2,463,701 | | | | 6,345,508 | |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS FROM (NOTES 1 AND 5): | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | | (5,001,106 | ) | | | (4,799,696 | ) |
|
| Decrease in Net Assets From Distributions to Shareholders | | | (5,001,106 | ) | | | (4,799,696 | ) |
|
FUND SHARE TRANSACTIONS (NOTE 6): | | | | | | | | |
| Net proceeds from sale of shares | | | 5,234,458 | | | | 12,777,163 | |
| Reinvestment of distributions | | | 5,001,106 | | | | 4,799,696 | |
| Cost of shares repurchased | | | (18,480,976 | ) | | | (13,390,612 | ) |
|
| Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Fund Share Transactions | | | (8,245,412 | ) | | | 4,186,247 | |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | | (10,782,817 | ) | | | 5,732,059 | |
NET ASSETS: | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning of year | | | 100,304,330 | | | | 94,572,271 | |
|
| End of year* | | $ | 89,521,513 | | | $ | 100,304,330 | |
|
* Includes overdistributed net investment income of: | | | $(2,773 | ) | | | $(112,788 | ) |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
78 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Statements of Changes in Net Assets (For the years ended December 31,) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Equity Index Portfolio |
| |
|
| | 2005 | | 2004 |
|
|
|
OPERATIONS: | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | $ | 24,366,477 | | | $ | 24,537,742 | |
| Net realized gain | | | 17,202,892 | | | | 7,049,449 | |
| Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | 31,886,377 | | | | 124,448,953 | |
|
| Increase in Net Assets From Operations | | | 73,455,746 | | | | 156,036,144 | |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS FROM (NOTES 1 AND 5): | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | | (24,301,557) | | | | (24,899,544) | |
|
| Decrease in Net Assets From Distributions to Shareholders | | | (24,301,557) | | | | (24,899,544) | |
|
FUND SHARE TRANSACTIONS (NOTE 6): | | | | | | | | |
| Net proceeds from sale of shares | | | 79,504,116 | | | | 219,053,115 | |
| Reinvestment of distributions | | | 24,301,557 | | | | 24,899,544 | |
| Cost of shares repurchased | | | (126,400,333) | | | | (73,428,986) | |
|
| Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Fund Share Transactions | | | (22,594,660) | | | | 170,523,673 | |
|
Increase in Net Assets | | | 26,559,529 | | | | 301,660,273 | |
NET ASSETS: | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning of year | | | 1,651,758,016 | | | | 1,350,097,743 | |
|
| End of year* | | $ | 1,678,317,545 | | | $ | 1,651,758,016 | |
|
* Includes undistributed net investment income of: | | | $114,615 | | | | $47,585 | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 79
| |
| Statements of Changes in Net Assets (For the years ended December 31,) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Salomon Brothers Variable |
| | Growth & Income Fund |
| |
|
| | 2005 | | 2004 |
|
|
|
OPERATIONS: | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | $ | 38,849 | | | $ | 99,926 | |
| Net realized gain | | | 371,237 | | | | 336,947 | |
| Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | (22,620) | | | | 456,349 | |
|
| Increase in Net Assets From Operations | | | 387,466 | | | | 893,222 | |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS FROM (NOTES 1 AND 5): | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | | (40,002) | | | | (101,977) | |
|
| Decrease in Net Assets From Distributions to Shareholders | | | (40,002) | | | | (101,977) | |
|
FUND SHARE TRANSACTIONS (NOTE 6): | | | | | | | | |
| Net proceeds from sale of shares | | | 966,534 | | | | 2,677,330 | |
| Reinvestment of distributions | | | 40,002 | | | | 101,977 | |
| Cost of shares repurchased | | | (2,016,392) | | | | (1,681,850) | |
|
| Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Fund Share Transactions | | | (1,009,856) | | | | 1,097,457 | |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | | (662,392) | | | | 1,888,702 | |
NET ASSETS: | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning of year | | | 11,758,573 | | | | 9,869,871 | |
|
| End of year* | | $ | 11,096,181 | | | $ | 11,758,573 | |
|
* Includes overdistributed net investment income of: | | | $(2,292) | | | | $(1,537) | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
80 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Statements of Changes in Net Assets (For the years ended December 31,) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Salomon Brothers Variable |
| | Aggressive Growth Fund |
| |
|
| | 2005 | | 2004 |
|
|
|
OPERATIONS: | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment loss | | $ | (190,759) | | | $ | (161,918) | |
| Net realized gain | | | 18,120 | | | | 505,017 | |
| Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | 5,564,067 | | | | 2,563,072 | |
|
| Increase in Net Assets From Operations | | | 5,391,428 | | | | 2,906,171 | |
|
FUND SHARE TRANSACTIONS (NOTE 6): | | | | | | | | |
| Net proceeds from sale of shares | | | 17,389,739 | | | | 25,873,371 | |
| Cost of shares repurchased | | | (3,934,857) | | | | (3,424,165) | |
|
| Increase in Net Assets From Fund Share Transactions | | | 13,454,882 | | | | 22,449,206 | |
|
Increase in Net Assets | | | 18,846,310 | | | | 25,355,377 | |
NET ASSETS: | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning of year | | | 42,457,958 | | | | 17,102,581 | |
|
| End of year* | | $ | 61,304,268 | | | $ | 42,457,958 | |
|
* Includes accumulated net investment loss of: | | | $(1,981) | | | | $(1,323) | |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 81
For a share of each class of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diversified Strategic Income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio(1) | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | |
|
|
|
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year | | | $9.30 | | | | $9.15 | | | | $8.69 | | | | $9.13 | | | | $9.70 | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | | 0.46 | | | | 0.48 | | | | 0.52 | | | | 0.53 | | | | 0.65 | | | |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.22 | ) | | | 0.14 | | | | 0.50 | | | | (0.11 | ) | | | (0.36 | ) | | |
|
Total Income From Operations | | | 0.24 | | | | 0.62 | | | | 1.02 | | | | 0.42 | | | | 0.29 | | | |
|
Less Distributions From: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | | (0.53 | ) | | | (0.47 | ) | | | (0.56 | ) | | | (0.86 | ) | | | (0.86 | ) | | |
|
Total Distributions | | | (0.53 | ) | | | (0.47 | ) | | | (0.56 | ) | | | (0.86 | ) | | | (0.86 | ) | | |
|
Net Asset Value, End of Year | | | $9.01 | | | | $9.30 | | | | $9.15 | | | | $8.69 | | | | $9.13 | | | |
|
Total Return(2) | | | 2.56 | % | | | 6.74 | % | | | 11.73 | % | | | 4.84 | % | | | 3.17 | % | | |
|
Net Assets, End of Year (000s) | | | $89,522 | | | | $100,304 | | | | $94,572 | | | | $78,009 | | | | $79,399 | | | |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross expenses | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.87 | % | | | 0.76 | % | | |
| Net expenses | | | 0.77 | | | | 0.76 | (3) | | | 0.76 | | | | 0.87 | | | | 0.76 | | | |
| Net investment income | | | 4.86 | | | | 5.15 | | | | 5.73 | | | | 5.82 | | | | 6.86 | | | |
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | | 83 | %(4) | | | 57 | %(4) | | | 54 | %(4) | | | 149 | % | | | 118 | % | | |
|
| | |
(1) | | Per share amounts have been calculated using the average shares method. |
(2) | | Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would be lower. Total returns do not reflect expenses associated with the separate accounts such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges which, if reflected, would reduce the total return for all periods shown. |
(3) | | The investment adviser voluntarily waived a portion of its fees. |
(4) | | Excluding mortgage dollar roll transactions. If mortgage dollar roll transactions had been included, the portfolio turnover rate would have been 538%, 382% and 256% for the years ended December 31, 2005, December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
82 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Financial Highlights (continued) |
For a share of each class of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity Index Portfolio — Class I Shares(1) | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | |
|
|
|
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year | | | $29.50 | | | | $27.11 | | | | $21.41 | | | | $28.21 | | | | $32.40 | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | | 0.45 | | | | 0.47 | | | | 0.34 | | | | 0.32 | | | | 0.34 | | | |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.89 | | | | 2.38 | | | | 5.68 | | | | (6.57 | ) | | | (4.26 | ) | | |
|
Total Income (Loss) From Operations | | | 1.34 | | | | 2.85 | | | | 6.02 | | | | (6.25 | ) | | | (3.92 | ) | | |
|
Less Distributions From: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | | (0.46 | ) | | | (0.46 | ) | | | (0.32 | ) | | | (0.55 | ) | | | (0.27 | ) | | |
|
Total Distributions | | | (0.46 | ) | | | (0.46 | ) | | | (0.32 | ) | | | (0.55 | ) | | | (0.27 | ) | | |
|
Net Asset Value, End of Year | | | $30.38 | | | | $29.50 | | | | $27.11 | | | | $21.41 | | | | $28.21 | | | |
|
Total Return(2) | | | 4.52 | % | | | 10.52 | % | | | 28.11 | % | | | (22.17 | )% | | | (12.12 | )% | | |
|
Net Assets, End of Year (millions) | | | $1,444 | | | | $1,425 | | | | $1,218 | | | | $831 | | | | $897 | | | |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross expenses | | | 0.34 | % | | | 0.34 | % | | | 0.34 | % | | | 0.31 | % | | | 0.23 | % | | |
| Net expenses | | | 0.34 | | | | 0.34 | (3) | | | 0.34 | | | | 0.31 | | | | 0.23 | | | |
| Net investment income | | | 1.51 | | | | 1.69 | | | | 1.44 | | | | 1.32 | | | | 1.17 | | | |
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | | 7 | % | | | 1 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 2 | % | | |
|
| |
(1) | Per share amounts have been calculated using the average shares method. |
|
(2) | Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would be lower. Total returns do not reflect expenses associated with the separate accounts such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges which, if reflected, would reduce the total return for all periods shown. |
|
(3) | The investment adviser voluntarily waived a portion of its fees. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 83
| |
| Financial Highlights (continued) |
For a share of each class of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity Index Portfolio — Class II Shares(1) | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | |
|
|
|
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year | | | $29.52 | | | | $27.13 | | | | $21.43 | | | | $28.17 | | | | $32.36 | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | | 0.37 | | | | 0.42 | | | | 0.28 | | | | 0.24 | | | | 0.27 | | | |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.89 | | | | 2.36 | | | | 5.66 | | | | (6.54 | ) | | | (4.26 | ) | | |
|
Total Income (Loss) From Operations | | | 1.26 | | | | 2.78 | | | | 5.94 | | | | (6.30 | ) | | | (3.99 | ) | | |
|
Less Distributions From: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | | (0.38 | ) | | | (0.39 | ) | | | (0.24 | ) | | | (0.44 | ) | | | (0.20 | ) | | |
|
Total Distributions | | | (0.38 | ) | | | (0.39 | ) | | | (0.24 | ) | | | (0.44 | ) | | | (0.20 | ) | | |
|
Net Asset Value, End of Year | | | $30.40 | | | | $29.52 | | | | $27.13 | | | | $21.43 | | | | $28.17 | | | |
|
Total Return(2) | | | 4.25 | % | | | 10.24 | % | | | 27.74 | % | | | (22.37 | )% | | | (12.36 | )% | | |
|
Net Assets, End of Year (millions) | | | $234 | | | | $227 | | | | $132 | | | | $86 | | | | $97 | | | |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross expenses | | | 0.60 | % | | | 0.59 | % | | | 0.60 | % | | | 0.56 | % | | | 0.49 | % | | |
| Net expenses | | | 0.60 | | | | 0.59 | (3) | | | 0.60 | | | | 0.56 | | | | 0.49 | | | |
| Net investment income | | | 1.26 | | | | 1.50 | | | | 1.18 | | | | 0.97 | | | | 0.91 | | | |
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | | 7 | % | | | 1 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 2 | % | | |
|
| |
(1) | Per share amounts have been calculated using the average shares method. |
|
(2) | Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would be lower. Total returns do not reflect expenses associated with the separate accounts such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges which, if reflected, would reduce the total return for all periods shown. |
|
(3) | The investment adviser voluntarily waived a portion of its fees. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
84 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Financial Highlights (continued) |
For a share of each class of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund — Class I Shares | | 2005(1) | | 2004(1) | | 2003(1) | | 2002 | | 2001 | | |
|
|
|
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year | | | $4.91 | | | | $4.57 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $4.90 | | | | $7.92 | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | | 0.02 | | | | 0.04 | | | | 0.01 | | | | 0.00 | (2) | | | 0.03 | | | |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.16 | | | | 0.34 | | | | 1.05 | | | | (1.14 | ) | | | (1.04 | ) | | |
|
Total Income (Loss) From Operations | | | 0.18 | | | | 0.38 | | | | 1.06 | | | | (1.14 | ) | | | (1.01 | ) | | |
|
Less Distributions From: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | | (0.02 | ) | | | (0.04 | ) | | | (0.01 | ) | | | (0.02 | ) | | | (0.12 | ) | | |
| Net realized gains | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.22 | ) | | | (1.89 | ) | | |
|
Total Distributions | | | (0.02 | ) | | | (0.04 | ) | | | (0.01 | ) | | | (0.24 | ) | | | (2.01 | ) | | |
|
Net Asset Value, End of Year | | | $5.07 | | | | $4.91 | | | | $4.57 | | | | $3.52 | | | | $4.90 | | | |
|
Total Return(3) | | | 3.63 | % | | | 8.38 | % | | | 30.16 | % | | | (23.35 | )% | | | (13.14 | )% | | |
|
Net Assets, End of Year (000s) | | | $11,096 | | | | $11,759 | | | | $9,870 | | | | $6,777 | | | | $11,087 | | | |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross expenses | | | 1.17 | % | | | 1.09 | % | | | 1.27 | % | | | 1.36 | % | | | 0.94 | % | | |
| Net expenses | | | 1.17 | | | | 1.07 | (4) | | | 1.27 | | | | 1.36 | | | | 0.94 | | | |
| Net investment income | | | 0.35 | | | | 0.95 | | | | 0.36 | | | | 0.04 | | | | 0.31 | | | |
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | | 54 | % | | | 83 | % | | | 63 | % | | | 46 | % | | | 81 | % | | |
|
| |
(1) | Per share amounts have been calculated using the average shares method. |
|
(2) | Amount represents less than $0.01 per share. |
|
(3) | Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would be lower. Total returns do not reflect expenses associated with the separate accounts such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges which, if reflected, would reduce the total return for all periods shown. |
| |
(4) | The investment adviser voluntarily waived a portion of its fees. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 85
| |
| Financial Highlights (continued) |
For a share of each class of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each year ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund — Class I Shares(1) | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001(2) | | |
|
|
|
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year | | | $21.23 | | | | $19.46 | | | | $13.89 | | | | $25.98 | | | | $178.99 | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment loss | | | (0.06 | ) | | | (0.09 | ) | | | (0.19 | ) | | | (0.25 | ) | | | (0.50 | ) | | |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 2.16 | | | | 1.86 | | | | 5.76 | | | | (8.18 | ) | | | (9.85 | ) | | |
|
Total Income (Loss) From Operations | | | 2.10 | | | | 1.77 | | | | 5.57 | | | | (8.43 | ) | | | (10.35 | ) | | |
|
Less Distributions From: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net realized gains | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3.66 | ) | | | (142.66 | ) | | |
|
Total Distributions | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3.66 | ) | | | (142.66 | ) | | |
|
Net Asset Value, End of Year | | | $23.33 | | | | $21.23 | | | | $19.46 | | | | $13.89 | | | | $25.98 | | | |
|
Total Return(3) | | | 9.89 | % | | | 9.10 | % | | | 40.10 | % | | | (32.65 | )% | | | (5.32 | )% | | |
|
Net Assets, End of Year (000s) | | | $33,220 | | | | $21,706 | | | | $11,684 | | | | $5,975 | | | | $12,745 | | | |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross expenses | | | 0.93 | % | | | 1.04 | % | | | 1.56 | % | | | 1.56 | % | | | 1.18 | % | | |
| Net expenses | | | 0.93 | | | | 1.04 | (4) | | | 1.56 | | | | 1.56 | | | | 1.18 | | | |
| Net investment loss | | | (0.26 | ) | | | (0.47 | ) | | | (1.16 | ) | | | (1.25 | ) | | | (0.97 | ) | | |
|
| Portfolio Turnover Rate | | | 0 | % | | | 4 | % | | | 3 | % | | | 4 | % | | | 0 | % | | |
|
| |
(1) | Per share amounts have been calculated using the average shares method. |
|
(2) | Per share amounts have been restated to reflect a 1 for 7 reverse stock split which was effective on September 7, 2001. |
(3) | Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would be lower. Total returns do not reflect expenses associated with the separate accounts such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges which, if reflected, would reduce the total return for all periods shown. |
| |
(4) | The investment adviser voluntarily waived a portion of its fees. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
86 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
| |
| Financial Highlights (continued) |
For a share of each class of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each year ended December 31, unless otherwise noted:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salomon Brothers Variable | | | | | | | | |
Aggressive Growth Fund — Class II Shares(1) | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2003(2) | | |
|
|
|
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year | | | $21.05 | | | | $19.35 | | | | $15.64 | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net investment loss | | | (0.11 | ) | | | (0.14 | ) | | | (0.13 | ) | | |
| Net realized and unrealized gain | | | 2.14 | | | | 1.84 | | | | 3.84 | | | |
|
Total Income From Operations | | | 2.03 | | | | 1.70 | | | | 3.71 | | | |
|
Net Asset Value, End of Year | | | $23.08 | | | | $21.05 | | | | $19.35 | | | |
|
Total Return(3) | | | 9.64 | % | | | 8.79 | % | | | 23.72 | % | | |
|
Net Assets, End of Year (000s) | | | $28,084 | | | | $20,752 | | | | $5,419 | | | |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross expenses | | | 1.18 | % | | | 1.28 | % | | | 1.64 | % (4) | | |
| Net expenses | | | 1.18 | | | | 1.28 | (5) | | | 1.64 | (4) | | |
| Net investment loss | | | (0.51 | ) | | | (0.70 | ) | | | (1.25 | )(4) | | |
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate | | | 0 | % | | | 4 | % | | | 3 | % | | |
|
| |
(1) | Per share amounts have been calculated using the average shares method. |
|
(2) | For the period May 12, 2003 (inception date) to December 31, 2003. |
|
(3) | Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would be lower. Total returns do not reflect expenses associated with the separate accounts such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges which, if reflected, would reduce the total return for all periods shown. Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized. |
| |
(4) | Annualized. |
|
(5) | The investment adviser voluntarily waived a portion of its fees. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 87
Notes to Financial Statements
| |
1. | Organization and Significant Accounting Policies |
The Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio (“Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio”), Equity Index Portfolio (“Equity Index Portfolio”), Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund (“Growth & Income Fund”) and Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund (“Aggressive Growth Fund”) (the “Funds”) are separate diversified investment funds of the Greenwich Street Series Fund (the “Trust”). The Trust, a Massachusetts business trust, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Funds and are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Estimates and assumptions are required to be made regarding assets, liabilities and changes in net assets resulting from operations when financial statements are prepared. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining these estimates could cause actual results to differ.
(a) Investment Valuation. Equity securities for which market quotations are available are valued at the last sale price or official closing price on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. Debt securities are valued at the mean between the bid and asked prices provided by an independent pricing service that are based on transactions in debt obligations, quotations from bond dealers, market transactions in comparable securities and various relationships between securities. When prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded, but before the Funds calculate their net asset value, the Funds may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Funds’ Board of Trustees. Short-term obligations with maturities of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.
(b) Repurchase Agreements. When entering into repurchase agreements, it is the Funds’ policy that their custodian or a third party custodian take possession of the underlying collateral securities, the market value of which at least equals the principal amount of the repurchase transaction, including accrued interest. To the extent that any repurchase transaction exceeds one business day, the value of the collateral is marked-to-market to ensure the adequacy of the collateral. If the seller defaults and the market value of the collateral declines or if bankruptcy proceedings are commenced with respect to the seller of the security, realization of the collateral by the Funds may be delayed or limited.
(c) Financial Futures Contracts. Certain Funds may enter into financial futures contracts typically to hedge a portion of the portfolios. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, the Funds are required to deposit cash or securities as initial margin. Additional securities are also segregated up to the current market value of the financial futures contracts. Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Funds each day, depending on the daily fluctuation in the value of the underlying financial instruments. The Funds recognize an unrealized gain or loss equal to the daily variation margin. When the financial futures contracts are closed, a realized gain or loss is
88 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
recognized equal to the difference between the proceeds from (or cost of) the closing transactions and the Funds’ basis in the contracts.
The risks associated with entering into financial futures contracts include the possibility that a change in the value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in the value of the underlying instruments. In addition, investing in financial futures contracts involves the risk that the Funds could lose more than the original margin deposit and subsequent payments required for a futures transaction. Risks may also arise upon entering into these contracts from the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts.
(d) Forward Foreign Currency Contracts. The Funds may enter into forward foreign currency contracts to hedge against foreign currency exchange rate risk on their non-US dollar denominated securities or to facilitate settlement of foreign currency denominated portfolio transactions. A forward foreign currency contract is an agreement between two parties to buy and sell a currency at a set price on a future date. The contract is marked-to-market daily and the change in value is recorded by the Funds as an unrealized gain or loss. When a forward foreign currency contract is extinguished, through either delivery or offset by entering into another forward foreign currency contract, the Funds record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value of the contract at the time it was extinguished.
Forward foreign currency contracts involve elements of market risk in excess of the amounts reflected in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The Funds bear the risk of an unfavorable change in the foreign exchange rate underlying the forward foreign currency contract. Risks may also arise upon entering into these contracts from the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts.
(e) Securities Traded on a To-Be-Announced Basis. Certain Funds may trade securities on a to-be-announced (“TBA”) basis. In a TBA transaction, the Funds commit to purchasing or selling securities which have not yet been issued by the issuer and for which specific information is not known, such as the face amount and maturity date and the underlying pool of investments in U.S. government agency mortgage pass-through transactions. Securities purchased on a TBA basis are not settled until they are delivered to the Funds, normally 15 to 45 days later. Beginning on the date the Funds enter into a TBA transaction, cash, U.S. government securities or other liquid high-grade debt obligations are segregated in an amount equal in value to the purchase price of the TBA security. These transactions are subject to market fluctuations and their current value is determined in the same manner as for other securities.
(f) Mortgage Dollar Rolls. The Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio enters into dollar rolls in which the Fund sells mortgage-backed securities for delivery in the current month and simultaneously contracts to repurchase substantially similar (same type, coupon and maturity) securities to settle on a specified future date. During the roll period, the Fund forgoes principal and interest paid on the securities. The Fund is compensated by a fee paid by the counterparty, often in the form of a drop in the repurchase price of the securities. Dollar rolls are accounted for as financing arrangements; the fee is accrued into
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 89
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
interest income ratably over the term of the dollar roll and any gain or loss on the roll is deferred and realized upon disposition of the rolled security.
The risk of entering into a mortgage dollar roll is that the market value of the securities the Fund is obligated to repurchase under the agreement may decline below the repurchase price. In the event the buyer of securities under a mortgage dollar roll files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent, the Fund’s use of proceeds of the dollar roll may be restricted pending a determination by the other party, or its trustee or receiver, whether to enforce the Fund’s obligation to repurchase the securities.
(g) Credit and Market Risk. Certain Funds invest in high yield instruments that are subject to certain credit and market risks. The yields of high yield obligations reflect, among other things, perceived credit risk. The Funds’ investment in securities rated below investment grade typically involves risks not associated with higher rated securities including, among others, greater risk related to timely and ultimate payment of interest and principal, greater market price volatility and less liquid secondary market trading.
(h) Security Transactions and Investment Income. Security transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is recorded on the accrual basis. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Foreign dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or as soon as practical after the Funds determine the existence of a dividend declaration after exercising reasonable due diligence. The cost of investments sold is determined by use of the specific identification method. To the extent any issuer defaults on an expected interest payment, the Funds’ policy is to generally halt any additional interest income accruals and consider the realizability of interest accrued up to the date of default.
(i) Foreign Currency Translation. Investment securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts based upon prevailing exchange rates on the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of investment securities and income and expense items denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts based upon prevailing exchange rates on the respective dates of such transactions.
The Funds do not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, including gains and losses on forward foreign currency contracts, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Funds’ books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the fair values of assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, at the date of valuation, resulting from changes in exchange rates.
Foreign security and currency transactions may involve certain considerations and risks not typically associated with those of U.S. dollar denominated transactions as a result of,
90 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
among other factors, the possibility of lower levels of governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets and the possibility of political or economic instability.
(j) REIT Distributions. The character of distributions received from Real Estate Investment Trusts (“REITs”) held by the Funds are generally comprised of net investment income, capital gains, and return of capital. It is the policy of the Funds to estimate the character of distributions received from underlying REITs based on historical data provided by the REITs. After each calendar year end, REITs report the true tax character of these distributions. Differences between the estimated and actual amounts reported by the REITs are reflected in the Funds’ records in the year in which they are reported by the REITs.
(k) Distributions to Shareholders. Distributions from net investment income and distributions of net realized gains, if any, are declared at least annually. Distributions to shareholders of the Funds are recorded on the ex-dividend date and are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(l) Class Accounting. Investment income, common expenses and realized/unrealized gain (loss) on investments are allocated to the various classes of the Funds on the basis of daily net assets of each class. Fees relating to a specific class are charged directly to that class.
(m) Federal and Other Taxes. It is the Funds’ policy to comply with the federal income and excise tax requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, applicable to regulated investment companies. Accordingly, the Funds intend to distribute substantially all of their income and net realized gains on investments, if any, to shareholders each year. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required in the Funds’ financial statements. Under the applicable foreign tax laws, a withholding tax may be imposed on interest, dividends and capital gains at various rates.
(n) Reclassification. GAAP requires that certain components of net assets be adjusted to reflect permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. These
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 91
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
reclassifications have no effect on net assets or net asset values per share. During the current year, the following reclassifications have been made:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Accumulated Net | | | | |
| | | | Investment Loss/ | | | | |
| | | | Undistributed/Overdistributed | | Accumulated Net | | |
Fund | | | | Net Investment Income | | Realized Losses | | Paid-in Capital |
|
|
|
Diversified Strategic Income | | | (a) | | | $ | 11,886 | | | | — | | | $ | (11,886 | ) |
| Portfolio | | | (b) | | | | 468,715 | | | $ | (468,715 | ) | | | — | |
|
Equity Index Portfolio | | | (c) | | | | 2,110 | | | | (2,110 | ) | | | — | |
|
Growth & Income Fund | | | (d) | | | | 395 | | | | — | | | | (395 | ) |
| | | | (e) | | | | 3 | | | | (3 | ) | | | — | |
|
Aggressive Growth Fund | | | (f) | | | | 190,101 | | | | — | | | | (190,101 | ) |
|
| |
(a) | Reclassifications are primarily due to a taxable overdistribution. |
|
(b) | Reclassifications are primarily due to foreign currency transactions treated as ordinary income for tax purposes, income from mortgage backed securities treated as capital gains for tax purposes, book/tax differences in the treatment of consent fees, and book/tax differences in the treatment of passive foreign investment companies. |
| |
(c) | Reclassifications are primarily due to book/tax differences in the treatment of various items. |
| |
(d) | Reclassifications are primarily due to a taxable overdistribution and rounding. |
|
(e) | Reclassifications are primarily due to foreign currency transactions treated as ordinary income for tax purposes. |
| |
(f) | Reclassifications are primarily due to a tax net operating loss. |
| |
2. | Management Agreement and Other Transactions with Affiliates |
On December 1, 2005, Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”) completed the sale of substantially all of its asset management business, Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”), to Legg Mason, Inc. (“Legg Mason”). As a result, the Funds’ investment advisers, Smith Barney Fund Management LLC (“SBFM”), Salomon Brothers Asset Management Inc. (“SBAM”) and TIMCO Asset Management, Inc. (“TIMCO”) (collectively, the “Manager”), and Citigroup Asset Management Ltd. (“CAM Ltd.”), the subadviser to Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio, previously indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of Citigroup, have become wholly-owned subsidiaries of Legg Mason. Completion of the sale caused the Funds’ existing investment advisory contracts to terminate. The Funds’ shareholders approved a new investment management contract (the “Management Agreement”) between the Funds and the Manager, which became effective on December 1, 2005.
Legg Mason, whose principal executive offices are in Baltimore, Maryland, is a financial services holding company.
Prior to the transaction, under each investment advisory agreement, the Funds paid an investment advisory fee calculated at an annual rate of each respective Fund’s average daily
92 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
net assets. These fees were calculated daily and paid monthly. The respective advisers and the annual rates were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Advisory |
| | Adviser | | Fee Rate |
|
|
|
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio | | | SBFM | | | | 0.450 | % |
|
Equity Index Portfolio | | | TIMCO | | | | 0.250 | |
|
Aggressive Growth Fund | | | SBAM | | | | 0.600 | |
|
Growth and Income Fund paid investment advisory fees to SBAM, in accordance with the following breakpoint schedule:
| | | | |
| | Advisory |
Average Daily Net Assets | | Fee Rate |
|
|
|
First $1.0 billion | | | 0.450 | % |
Next $1.0 billion | | | 0.425 | |
Next $1.0 billion | | | 0.400 | |
Next $1.0 billion | | | 0.375 | |
Over $4.0 billion | | | 0.350 | |
|
CAM Ltd. served as sub-investment adviser to the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio and was paid a monthly fee by SBFM calculated at a rate of 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio did not make any direct payments to CAM Ltd.
In addition, under each administration agreement, the Funds paid SBFM an administration fee calculated at an annual rate of each respective Fund’s average daily net assets. These fees were calculated daily and paid monthly. The Equity Index Portfolio paid an administration fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.06% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio, Growth and Income Fund, and Aggressive Growth Fund each paid administration fees, in accordance with the following breakpoint schedules:
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio:
| | | | |
| | Administration |
Average Daily Net Assets | | Fee Rate |
|
|
|
First $1.0 billion | | | 0.200% | |
Next $1.0 billion | | | 0.175 | |
Next $3.0 billion | | | 0.150 | |
Next $5.0 billion | | | 0.125 | |
Over $10.0 billion | | | 0.100 | |
|
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 93
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
Growth & Income Fund:
| | | | |
| | Administration |
Average Daily Net Assets | | Fee Rate |
|
|
|
First $1.0 billion | | | 0.200% | |
Next $1.0 billion | | | 0.175 | |
Next $1.0 billion | | | 0.150 | |
Next $1.0 billion | | | 0.125 | |
Over $4.0 billion | | | 0.100 | |
|
Aggressive Growth Fund:
| | | | |
| | Administration |
Average Daily Net Assets | | Fee Rate |
|
|
|
First $1.0 billion | | | 0.150% | |
Next $1.0 billion | | | 0.125 | |
Next $3.0 billion | | | 0.100 | |
Next $5.0 billion | | | 0.075 | |
Over $10.0 billion | | | 0.050 | |
|
Not withstanding the foregoing, prior to October 1, 2005, the Aggressive Growth Fund paid an investment advisory fee to SBAM, in accordance with the following breakpoint schedule:
| | | | |
| | Advisory |
Average Daily Net Assets | | Fee Rate |
|
|
|
First $5.0 billion | | | 0.600% | |
Next $2.5 billion | | | 0.575 | |
Next $2.5 billion | | | 0.550 | |
Over $10.0 billion | | | 0.500 | |
|
In addition, the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio and the Aggressive Growth Fund paid SBFM an administration fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.20% of their respective average daily net assets.
These fees were calculated daily and paid monthly.
94 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
Under the new Management Agreement, the Funds pay the Manager a management fee for advisory and administrative services in accordance with the following breakpoint schedules:
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio:
| | | | |
| | Management |
Average Daily Net Assets | | Fee Rate |
|
|
|
First $1.0 billion | | | 0.650% | |
Next $1.0 billion | | | 0.625 | |
Next $3.0 billion | | | 0.600 | |
Next $5.0 billion | | | 0.575 | |
Over $10.0 billion | | | 0.550 | |
|
Growth & Income Fund:
| | | | |
| | Management |
Average Daily Net Assets | | Fee Rate |
|
|
|
First $1.0 billion | | | 0.650% | |
Next $1.0 billion | | | 0.600 | |
Next $1.0 billion | | | 0.550 | |
Next $1.0 billion | | | 0.500 | |
Over $4.0 billion | | | 0.450 | |
|
Aggressive Growth Fund:
| | | | |
| | Management |
Average Daily Net Assets | | Fee Rate |
|
|
|
First $1.0 billion | | | 0.750% | |
Next $1.0 billion | | | 0.725 | |
Next $3.0 billion | | | 0.700 | |
Next $5.0 billion | | | 0.675 | |
Over $10.0 billion | | | 0.650 | |
|
The Equity Index Portfolio pays the Manager an advisory fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets and an administration fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.06% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
These fees are calculated daily and paid monthly.
The Funds’ Board has approved PFPC Inc. (“PFPC”) to serve as transfer agent for the Funds, effective January 1, 2006. The principal business office of PFPC is located at 4400 Computer Drive, Westborough, MA 01581. During the period covered by this report, Citicorp Trust Bank, fsb. (“CTB”), a subsidiary of Citigroup, acted as the Funds’ transfer agent. PFPC acted as the Funds’ sub-transfer agent. CTB received account fees and asset-based fees that varied according to the size and type of account. PFPC was responsible for
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 95
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
shareholder recordkeeping and financial processing for all shareholder accounts and was paid by CTB. For the period ended December 31, 2005, the Funds paid transfer agent fees of $13,823 to CTB.
| | | | |
| | Transfer Agent |
|
|
|
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio | | | $4,583 | |
|
Equity Index Portfolio | | | 9,167 | |
|
Growth & Income Fund | | | 35 | |
|
Aggressive Growth Fund | | | 38 | |
|
The Funds’ Board has appointed the Funds’ current distributor, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGM”) and Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC (“LMIS”), a wholly-owned broker-dealer subsidiary of Legg Mason, as co-distributors of the Funds. The Funds’ Board has also approved amended and restated Rule 12b-1 Plans (each, a “Rule 12b-1 Plan”). CGM and other broker-dealers, financial intermediaries and financial institutions (each called a “Service Agent”) that currently offer Fund shares will continue to make the Funds’ shares available to their clients. Additional Service Agents may offer Funds shares in the future.
Effective December 1, 2005, The Trust, on behalf of the Equity Index Portfolio, Growth & Income Fund and Aggressive Growth Fund, adopted an amended shareholder services and distribution plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (“Rule 12b-1 Plan”) under the 1940 Act for the Funds’ Class II shares. The Plan provides that the Trust, on behalf of the Funds, shall pay CGM a fee up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Funds attributable to Class II shares. As of December 31, 2005, Growth & Income Fund had not issued any Class II Shares.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, CGM and its affiliates received brokerage commissions of $50 from Growth & Income Fund and $38 from Aggressive Growth Fund.
The Funds have adopted an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the “Plan”) which allows non-interested trustees (“Independent Trustees”) to defer the receipt of all or a portion of the trustees’ fees earned until a later date specified by the Independent Trustees. The deferred fees earn a return based on notional investments selected by the Independent Trustees. The balance of the deferred fees payable may change depending upon the investment performance. Any gains or losses incurred in the deferred balances are reported in the statement of operations under trustees’ fees. Under the Plan, deferred fees are considered a general obligation of the Funds and any payments made pursuant to the Plan will be made from the Funds’ general assets.
As of December 31, 2005, the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio, Equity Index Portfolio, Growth & Income Fund and Aggressive Growth Fund have accrued $2,773, $3,063, $2,292 and $1,981 as deferred compensation, respectively.
Certain officers and one Trustee of the Trust are employees of Legg Mason or its affiliates and do not receive any compensation from the Trust.
96 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investments (excluding short-term investments and mortgage dollar rolls) were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | U.S. Government & |
| | Investments | | Agency Obligations |
| |
| |
|
| | Purchases | | Sales | | Purchases | | Sales |
|
|
|
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio | | $ | 21,452,646 | | | $ | 46,637,749 | | | $ | 53,454,223 | | | $ | 34,717,503 | |
|
Equity Index Portfolio | | | 155,492,992 | | | | 109,398,527 | | | | — | | | | — | |
|
Growth & Income Fund | | | 5,986,348 | | | | 6,788,169 | | | | — | | | | — | |
|
Aggressive Growth Fund | | | 13,063,121 | | | | 60,988 | | | | — | | | | — | |
|
At December 31, 2005, the aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Gross unrealized | | Gross unrealized | | Net unrealized |
| | appreciation | | depreciation | | appreciation/depreciation |
|
|
|
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio | | $ | 1,485,048 | | | $ | (1,839,914 | ) | | $ | (354,866 | ) |
|
Equity Index Portfolio | | | 321,228,586 | | | | (226,919,299 | ) | | | 94,309,287 | |
|
Growth & Income Fund | | | 2,210,520 | | | | (142,183 | ) | | | 2,068,337 | |
|
Aggressive Growth Fund | | | 11,892,061 | | | | (4,529,027 | ) | | | 7,363,034 | |
|
At December 31, 2005, the Funds had the following open futures contracts:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diversified Strategic | | Number of | | Expiration | | Basis | | Market | | Unrealized |
Income Portfolio | | Contracts | | Date | | Value | | Value | | Gain/Loss |
|
|
|
Contracts to Buy: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury 10 Year Notes | | | 21 | | | | 3/06 | | | $ | 2,278,743 | | | $ | 2,297,531 | | | $ | 18,788 | |
U.S. Treasury 2 Year Notes | | | 11 | | | | 3/06 | | | | 2,255,851 | | | | 2,257,062 | | | | 1,211 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 19,999 | |
|
Contracts to Sell: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury 5 Year Notes | | | 4 | | | | 3/06 | | | $ | 423,329 | | | $ | 425,375 | | | | (2,046 | ) |
|
Net Unrealized Gain on Open Futures Contracts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 17,953 | |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio entered into mortgage dollar roll transactions in the aggregate amount of $412,431,914. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Fund recorded interest income of $699,262
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 97
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
related to such transactions. At December 31, 2005, the Fund had outstanding net contracts to repurchase mortgage-backed securities of $40,407,598 for scheduled settlements on January 12 and 18, 2006.
| |
4. | Class Specific Expenses |
Pursuant to a Rule 12b-1 Plan, the Equity Index Portfolio, Growth & Income Fund and Aggressive Growth Fund each pay a distribution fee with respect to its Class II shares calculated at the annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets attributable to Class II shares. As of December 31, 2005, no Class II shares were issued for Growth & Income Fund. For the year ended December 31, 2005, total Distribution fees, which are accrued daily and paid monthly, were as follows:
| | |
| | Class II |
|
|
|
Equity Index Portfolio | | $578,430 |
|
Aggressive Growth Fund | | 59,904 |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2005, total Transfer Agent fees were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Class I | | Class II |
|
|
|
Equity Index Portfolio | | $ | 5,007 | | | $ | 5,008 | |
|
Aggressive Growth Fund | | | 88 | | | | 81 | |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2005, total Shareholder Reports expenses were as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | Class I | | Class II |
|
|
|
Equity Index Portfolio | | $143,229 | | $ | 26,173 | |
|
Aggressive Growth Fund | | 8,419 | | | 7,661 | |
|
98 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
| |
5. | Distributions to Shareholders by Class |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended | | Year Ended |
| | December 31, 2005 | | December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 5,001,106 | | | $ | 4,799,696 | |
|
Equity Index Portfolio Class I | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 21,430,279 | | | $ | 21,936,892 | |
|
Equity Index Portfolio Class II | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 2,871,278 | | | $ | 2,962,652 | |
|
Growth & Income Fund | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 40,002 | | | $ | 101,977 | |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Aggressive Growth Fund did not make any distributions.
| |
6. | Shares of Beneficial Interest |
At December 31, 2005, the Trust had an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest authorized with a par value of $0.001 per share. The Equity Index Portfolio, Growth & Income Fund and Aggressive Growth Fund have the ability to issue multiple classes of shares. Each share of a class represents an identical interest and has the same rights, except that each class bears certain direct expenses specifically related to the distribution of its shares.
On August 30, 2002, the Aggressive Growth Fund and the Growth & Income Fund created a separate class of shares designated as Class II shares. Prior to that date, these Funds issued one class of shares, which, as of August 30, 2002, has been designated Class I shares. As of December 31, 2005, Growth & Income Fund had not issued any Class II shares.
Transactions in shares of each Fund were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | Year Ended | | Year Ended |
| | December 31, 2005 | | December 31, 2004 |
| |
| |
|
| | Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount |
|
|
|
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 559,692 | | | $ | 5,234,458 | | | | 1,370,414 | | | $ | 12,777,163 | |
Shares issued on reinvestment | | | 552,927 | | | | 5,001,106 | | | | 517,828 | | | | 4,799,696 | |
Shares repurchased | | | (1,970,148 | ) | | | (18,480,976 | ) | | | (1,436,108 | ) | | | (13,390,612 | ) |
|
Net Increase (Decrease) | | | (857,529 | ) | | $ | (8,245,412 | ) | | | 452,134 | | | $ | 4,186,247 | |
|
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 99
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | Year Ended | | Year Ended |
| | December 31, 2005 | | December 31, 2004 |
| |
| |
|
| | Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount |
|
|
|
Equity Index Portfolio Class I | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 1,783,407 | | | $ | 52,469,338 | | | | 4,668,053 | | | $ | 129,139,424 | |
Shares issued on reinvestment | | | 699,911 | | | | 21,430,279 | | | | 743,910 | | | | 21,936,892 | |
Shares repurchased | | | (3,243,069 | ) | | | (96,663,549 | ) | | | (2,029,271 | ) | | | (56,382,704 | ) |
|
Net Increase (Decrease) | | | (759,751 | ) | | $ | (22,763,932 | ) | | | 3,382,692 | | | $ | 94,693,612 | |
|
Equity Index Portfolio Class II | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 917,995 | | | $ | 27,034,778 | | | | 3,314,334 | | | $ | 89,913,691 | |
Shares issued on reinvestment | | | 93,715 | | | | 2,871,278 | | | | 100,387 | | | | 2,962,652 | |
Shares repurchased | | | (1,001,831 | ) | | | (29,736,784 | ) | | | (610,686 | ) | | | (17,046,282 | ) |
|
Net Increase | | | 9,879 | | | $ | 169,272 | | | | 2,804,035 | | | $ | 75,830,061 | |
|
Growth & Income Fund | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 199,677 | | | $ | 966,534 | | | | 578,485 | | | $ | 2,677,330 | |
Shares issued on reinvestment | | | 7,828 | | | | 40,002 | | | | 20,749 | | | | 101,977 | |
Shares repurchased | | | (414,168 | ) | | | (2,016,392 | ) | | | (367,287 | ) | | | (1,681,850 | ) |
|
Net Increase (Decrease) | | | (206,663 | ) | | $ | (1,009,856 | ) | | | 231,947 | | | $ | 1,097,457 | |
|
Aggressive Growth Fund Class I | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 473,718 | | | $ | 10,157,123 | | | | 523,041 | | | $ | 10,418,783 | |
Shares repurchased | | | (72,209 | ) | | | (1,562,217 | ) | | | (101,052 | ) | | | (2,029,612 | ) |
|
Net Increase | | | 401,509 | | | $ | 8,594,906 | | | | 421,989 | | | $ | 8,389,171 | |
|
Aggressive Growth Fund Class II | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 342,024 | | | $ | 7,232,616 | | | | 777,437 | | | $ | 15,454,588 | |
Shares repurchased | | | (110,836 | ) | | | (2,372,640 | ) | | | (71,755 | ) | | | (1,394,553 | ) |
|
Net Increase | | | 231,188 | | | $ | 4,859,976 | | | | 705,682 | | | $ | 14,060,035 | |
|
| |
7. | Income Tax Information and Distributions to Shareholders |
The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Diversified Strategic | | Equity Index | | Growth & |
| | Income Portfolio | | Portfolio | | Income Fund |
|
|
|
Distributions paid from: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Ordinary Income | | $ | 5,001,106 | | | $ | 24,301,557 | | | $ | 40,002 | |
|
The Aggressive Growth Fund did not make any distributions during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
100 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Diversified Strategic | | Equity Index | | Growth & |
| | Income Portfolio | | Portfolio | | Income Fund |
|
|
|
Distributions paid from: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Ordinary Income | | $ | 4,799,696 | | | $ | 24,899,544 | | | $ | 101,977 | |
|
The Aggressive Growth Fund did not make any distributions during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
As of December 31, 2005, the components of accumulated earnings (losses) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Diversified | | | | | | |
| | Strategic Income | | Equity Index | | Growth & | | Aggressive |
| | Portfolio | | Portfolio | | Income Fund | | Growth Fund |
|
|
|
Undistributed ordinary income — net | | | — | | | $ | 117,678 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Capital loss carryforward* | | $ | (7,111,968 | ) | | | (7,879,134 | ) | | $ | (625,649 | ) | | $ | (577,590 | ) |
Other book/tax temporary differences | | | (33,255 | )(a) | | | (3,063 | )(c) | | | (11,015 | ) (e) | | | (1,995 | )(e) |
Unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | (341,709 | )(b) | | | 94,309,287 | (d) | | | 2,068,337 | (f) | | | 7,363,034 | (g) |
|
Total accumulated earnings/(losses) — net | | $ | (7,486,932 | ) | | $ | 86,544,768 | | | $ | 1,431,673 | | | $ | 6,783,449 | |
|
| |
* | During the taxable year ended December 31, 2005, Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio utilized $1,332,611, Equity Index Portfolio utilized $22,423,970, Growth & Income Fund utilized $264,015, and Aggressive Growth Fund utilized $18,134, of each of their respective capital loss carryovers available from prior years. As of December 31, 2005, the Funds had the following net capital loss carryforwards remaining: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Diversified | | | | | | |
| | Strategic Income | | Equity Index | | Growth & | | Aggressive |
| | Portfolio | | Portfolio | | Income Fund | | Growth Fund |
Years of Expiration | |
| |
| |
| |
|
12/31/2008 | | $ | (449,197 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
12/31/2009 | | | (4,543,816 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
12/31/2010 | | | (2,118,955 | ) | | $ | (7,879,134 | ) | | | — | | | $ | (577,590 | ) |
12/31/2011 | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | (625,649 | ) | | | — | |
|
| | $ | (7,111,968 | ) | | $ | (7,879,134 | ) | | $ | (625,649 | ) | | $ | (577,590 | ) |
| |
|
| |
| These amounts will be available to offset any future taxable gains. |
| |
(a) | Other book/tax temporary differences are attributable primarily to the realization for tax purposes of unrealized gains on certain futures contracts, the deferral of post- October capital losses for tax purposes, and differences in the book/tax treatment of various items. |
|
(b) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales and book/tax differences in the treatment of consent fees. |
| |
(c) | Other book/tax temporary differences are attributable primarily to differences in the book/tax treatment of various items. |
| |
(d) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales, the difference between the book and tax cost basis of investments in real estate investment trusts, and other book/tax basis of adjustments. |
|
(e) | Other book/tax temporary differences are attributable primarily to the deferral of post-October capital losses for tax purposes and differences in the book/tax treatment of various items. |
| |
(f) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales. |
| |
(g) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is attributable primarily to other book/tax basis adjustments. |
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 101
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
On May 31, 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued an order in connection with the settlement of an administrative proceeding against SBFM and CGM relating to the appointment of an affiliated transfer agent for the Smith Barney family of mutual funds (the “Funds”).
The SEC order finds that SBFM and CGM willfully violated Section 206(1) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”). Specifically, the order finds that SBFM and CGM knowingly or recklessly failed to disclose to the boards of the Funds in 1999 when proposing a new transfer agent arrangement with an affiliated transfer agent that: First Data Investors Services Group (“First Data”), the Funds’ then-existing transfer agent, had offered to continue as transfer agent and do the same work for substantially less money than before; and that Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”), the Citigroup business unit that, at the time, included the Funds’ investment manager and other investment advisory companies, had entered into a side letter with First Data under which CAM agreed to recommend the appointment of First Data as sub-transfer agent to the affiliated transfer agent in exchange for, among other things, a guarantee by First Data of specified amounts of asset management and investment banking fees to CAM and CGM. The order also finds that SBFM and CGM willfully violated Section 206(2) of the Advisers Act by virtue of the omissions discussed above and other misrepresentations and omissions in the materials provided to the Funds’ boards, including the failure to make clear that the affiliated transfer agent would earn a high profit for performing limited functions while First Data continued to perform almost all of the transfer agent functions, and the suggestion that the proposed arrangement was in the Funds’ best interests and that no viable alternatives existed. SBFM and CGM do not admit or deny any wrongdoing or liability. The settlement does not establish wrongdoing or liability for purposes of any other proceeding.
The SEC censured SBFM and CGM and ordered them to cease and desist from violations of Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Advisers Act. The order requires Citigroup to pay $208.1 million, including $109 million in disgorgement of profits, $19.1 million in interest, and a civil money penalty of $80 million. Approximately $24.4 million has already been paid to the Funds, primarily through fee waivers. The remaining $183.7 million, including the penalty, has been paid to the U.S. Treasury and will be distributed pursuant to a plan prepared and submitted for approval by the SEC. The order also requires that transfer agency fees received from the Funds since December 1, 2004 less certain expenses be placed in escrow and provides that a portion of such fees may be subsequently distributed in accordance with the terms of the order.
The order required SBFM to recommend a new transfer agent contract to the Fund boards within 180 days of the entry of the order; if a Citigroup affiliate submitted a proposal to serve as transfer agent or sub-transfer agent, SBFM and CGM would have been required, at their expense, to engage an independent monitor to oversee a competitive bidding process. On November 21, 2005, and within the specified timeframe, the Funds’ Board selected a new transfer agent for the Funds. No Citigroup affiliate submitted a
102 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
proposal to serve as transfer agent. Under the order, SBFM also must comply with an amended version of a vendor policy that Citigroup instituted in August 2004.
At this time, there is no certainty as to how the proceeds of the settlement will be distributed, to whom such distributions will be made, the methodology by which such distributions will be allocated, and when such distributions will be made. Although there can be no assurance, SBFM does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Funds.
On December 1, 2005, Citigroup completed the sale of substantially all of its global asset management business, including SBFM, to Legg Mason Inc.
Beginning in August 2005, five class action lawsuits alleging violations of federal securities laws and state law were filed against CGM and SBFM, (collectively, the “Defendants”) based on the May 31, 2005 settlement order issued against the Defendants by the SEC described in Note 8. The complaints seek injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, removal of SBFM as the advisor for the Smith Barney family of funds, rescission of the Funds’ management and other contracts with SBFM, recovery of all fees paid to SBFM pursuant to such contracts, and an award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses.
On October 5, 2005, a motion to consolidate the five actions and any subsequently-filed, related action was filed. That motion contemplates that a consolidated amended complaint alleging substantially similar causes of action will be filed in the future.
As of the date of this report, the Funds’ investment manager believes that resolution of the pending lawsuit will not have a material effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Funds or the ability of the Funds’ investment manager and its affiliates to continue to render services to the Funds under their respective contracts.
* * *
Beginning in June 2004, class action lawsuits alleging violations of the federal securities laws were filed against CGM (the “Distributor”) and a number of its affiliates, including SBFM and Salomon Brothers Asset Management Inc (the “Advisers”), substantially all of the mutual funds managed by the Advisers, including the Funds (the “Funds”), and directors or trustees of the Funds (collectively, the “Defendants”). The complaints alleged, among other things, that CGM created various undisclosed incentives for its brokers to sell Smith Barney and Salomon Brothers funds. In addition, according to the complaints, the Advisers caused the Funds to pay excessive brokerage commissions to CGM for steering clients towards proprietary funds. The complaints also alleged that the defendants breached their fiduciary duty to the Funds by improperly charging Rule l2b-1 fees and by drawing on fund assets to make undisclosed payments of soft dollars and excessive brokerage commissions. The complaints also alleged that the Funds failed to adequately disclose certain of the allegedly wrongful conduct. The complaints sought injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, rescission of the Funds’ contracts with the Advisers, recovery of all fees paid to the Advisers pursuant to such contracts and an award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 103
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
On December 15, 2004, a consolidated amended complaint (the “Complaint”) was filed alleging substantially similar causes of action. While the lawsuit is in its earliest stages, to the extent that the Complaint purports to state causes of action against the Funds, the Funds’ investment manager believes the Funds have significant defenses to such allegations, which the Funds intend to vigorously assert in responding to the Complaint.
Additional lawsuits arising out of these circumstances and presenting similar allegations and requests for relief may be filed against the Defendants in the future.
As of the date of this report, the Funds’ investment manager and the Funds believe that the resolution of the pending lawsuit will not have a material effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Funds or the ability of the Advisers and their affiliates to continue to render services to the Funds under their respective contracts.
The Defendants have moved to dismiss the Complaint. Those motions are pending before the court.
On September 16, 2005, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) informed SBFM and Salomon Brothers Asset Management Inc (“SBAM”) that the staff is considering recommending that the Commission institute administrative proceedings against SBFM and SBAM for alleged violations of Section 19(a) and 34(b) of the Investment Company Act (and related Rule 19a-1). The notification is a result of an industry wide inspection by the Commission and is based upon alleged deficiencies in disclosures regarding dividends and distributions paid to shareholders of certain funds. Section 19(a) and related Rule 19a-1 of the Investment Company Act generally require funds that are making dividend and distribution payments to provide shareholders with a written statement disclosing the source of the dividends and distributions, and, in particular, the portion of the payments made from each of net investment income, undistributed net profits and/ or paid-in capital. In connection with the contemplated proceedings, the staff may seek a cease and desist order and/or monetary damages from SBFM or SBAM.
Although there can be no assurance, SBFM and SBAM believes that this matter is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Funds or SBFM and SBAM’s ability to perform investment management services relating to the Funds.
104 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Shareholders and Board of Trustees
Greenwich Street Series Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the schedules of investments, of Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio, Equity Index Portfolio, Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund and Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund (formerly Salomon Brothers Variable Emerging Growth Fund), each a series of Greenwich Street Series Fund, as of December 31, 2005, and the related statements of operations for the year then ended, statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2005, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers or by other appropriate auditing procedures. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio, Equity Index Portfolio, Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund and Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund as of December 31, 2005, and the results of their operations for the year then ended, the changes in their net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
![-S- KPMG LLP](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096kpmgsig.gif)
New York, New York
February 22, 2006
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 105
Board Approval of Management and Subadvisory Agreements (unaudited)
Greenwich Street Series Fund
At separate meetings of the Trust’s Board of Trustees, the Board considered the re-approval for an annual period of the Trust’s investment advisory agreements pursuant to which Smith Barney Fund Management LLC (“SBFM”) provides the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio, TIMCO Asset Management, Inc. (“TIMCO”) provides the Equity Index Portfolio, and Salomon Brothers Asset Management Inc. (“SBAM”) provides the Growth & Income Fund and the Aggressive Growth Fund with investment advisory services. The Trust’s Board also considered the re-approval for an annual period of the sub-investment advisory agreement between SBFM and Citigroup Asset Management Limited (“CAM Ltd.”) pursuant to which CAM Ltd. provides the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio with sub-investment advisory services, and the Trust’s administration agreement pursuant to which SBFM provides each Fund with administrative services. The investment advisory agreements, sub-investment advisory agreement and administration agreement are collectively referred to as the (“Agreement”). SBFM, TIMCO, SBAM and CAM Ltd. were each wholly-owned subsidiaries of Citigroup, Inc. (“Citigroup”) and are referred to as the (“Manager”). The Board members who are not “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Independent Trustees”)) of the Trust were assisted in their review by Fund counsel and independent legal counsel and met with independent legal counsel in executive sessions separate from representatives of the Manager. The Independent Trustees requested and received information from the Manager they deemed reasonably necessary for their review of the Agreement and the Manager’s performance. This information was initially reviewed by a special committee of the Independent Trustees and then by the full Board. Prior to the Board’s deliberations, Citigroup had announced an agreement to sell the Manager to Legg Mason, which, subject to certain approvals, was expected to be effective later in the year. Consequently, representatives of Legg Mason discussed with the Board Legg Mason’s intentions regarding the preservation and strengthening of the Manager’s business. The Independent Trustees also requested and received certain assurances from senior management of Legg Mason regarding the continuation of the level of services provided to the Funds and their shareholders should the sale of the Manager be consummated. At subsequent Board meetings, representatives of Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”) and Legg Mason made additional presentations to and responded to further questions from the Board regarding Legg Mason’s acquisition of CAM, which includes the Manager. After considering these presentations and reviewing additional written materials provided by CAM and Legg Mason, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, approved, subject to shareholder approval, a new Agreement permitting the Manager to continue to provide its services to the Funds after consummation of the sale of the Manager to Legg Mason. (Shareholders approved the new Agreement and the sale of CAM to Legg Mason was consummated as of December 1, 2005.)
In voting to approve the Agreement, the Independent Trustees considered whether the approval of the Agreement would be in the best interests of the respective Funds and their shareholders, an evaluation based on several factors including those discussed below.
106 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Board Approval of Management and Subadvisory Agreements (unaudited) (continued)
Analysis of the Nature, Extent and Quality of the Services
provided to each Fund
The Board received a presentation from representatives of the Manager regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to each Fund and other funds in the CAM fund complex. In addition, the Independent Trustees received and considered other information regarding the services provided to the respective Fund by the Manager under the Agreement during the past year, including a description of the administrative and other services rendered to the Funds and their shareholders by SBFM. The Board noted information received at regular meetings throughout the year related to the services rendered by the Manager about the management of the respective Fund’s affairs and SBFM’s role in coordinating the activities of the Trust’s other service providers. The Board’s evaluation of the services provided by the Manager took into account the Board’s knowledge and familiarity gained as Board members of funds in the CAM fund complex, including the scope and quality of the Manager’s investment management and other capabilities and the quality of SBFM’s administrative and other services. The Board observed that the scope of services provided by the Manager had expanded over time as a result of regulatory and other developments, including maintaining and monitoring its own and the Trust’s expanded compliance programs. The Board also considered the Manager’s response to recent regulatory compliance issues affecting the Manager and the CAM fund complex. The Board reviewed information received from the Manager and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer regarding the implementation to date of the Trust’s compliance policies and procedures established pursuant to Rule 38a-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
The Board reviewed the qualifications, backgrounds and responsibilities of each Fund’s senior personnel and the portfolio management team primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Fund. The Board also considered the willingness of the Manager to consider and implement organizational changes to improve investment results and the services provided to the CAM fund complex. The Board noted that the Manager’s Office of the Chief Investment Officer, comprised of the senior officers of the investment teams managing the funds in the CAM complex, participates in reporting to the Board on investment matters. The Board also considered, based on its knowledge of the Manager and its affiliates, the financial resources available to CAM and its parent organization, Citigroup.
The Board also considered the Manager’s brokerage policies and practices, the standards applied in seeking best execution, the Manager’s policies and practices regarding soft dollars, the use of a broker affiliated with the Manager and the existence of quality controls applicable to brokerage allocation procedures. In addition, management also reported to the Board on, among other things, its business plans, recent organizational changes and portfolio manager compensation plan.
The Board concluded that, overall, it was satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) under the Agreement by the Manager.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 107
Board Approval of Management and Subadvisory Agreements (unaudited) (continued)
Fund Performance
The Board received and reviewed performance information for each Fund and for a group of comparable funds (the “Performance Universe”) selected by Lipper Inc., an independent provider of investment company data. The Board was provided with a description of the methodology Lipper used to determine the similarity of the relevant Fund with the funds included in the Performance Universe. The Board also was provided with information comparing each Fund’s performance to the Lipper category averages over various time periods. The Board members noted that they had also received and discussed with management information throughout the year at periodic intervals comparing each Fund’s performance against its benchmark index.
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio — The information comparing the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio’s performance to that of its Performance Universe, consisting of all underlying variable insurance portfolios classified as “general bond funds” by Lipper, was for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended March 31, 2005. The Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio performed at the median for the one-year period, but its performance for the three-, five- and ten-year periods was below the median. The Board also reviewed performance information provided by the Manager for periods ended June 2005, which showed that the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio’s performance continued to be competitive compared to the Lipper category average during the second quarter. The Board noted that in July 2002 there had been a change in the portfolio management team managing the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio’s investments and took into account reports throughout the year demonstrating that the Fund’s performance was improving. Based on its review, the Board generally was satisfied with the Manager’s efforts to improve Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio’s performance, but concluded that it was necessary to closely monitor the performance of the Fund and its portfolio management team.
Equity Index Portfolio — The information comparing the Equity Index Portfolio’s performance to that of its Performance Universe, consisting of all underlying variable insurance portfolios classified as “S&P 500 index funds” by Lipper, was for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended March 31, 2005. The Equity Index Portfolio performed at the median for the one-year period, better than the median for the three- and five-year periods and below the median for the ten-year period. The Board also reviewed performance information provided by the Manager for periods ended June 2005, which showed the Fund’s performance continued to be competitive during the second quarter compared to the Lipper category average. Based on its review, the Board generally was satisfied with the Equity Index Portfolio’s performance.
Aggressive Growth Fund — The information comparing the Aggressive Growth Fund’s performance to that of its Performance Universe, consisting of all underlying variable insurance portfolios classified as “multi-cap growth funds” by Lipper, was for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended March 31, 2005. The Aggressive Growth Fund performed below the median for the one-year period and better than the median for the
108 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Board Approval of Management and Subadvisory Agreements (unaudited) (continued)
three-, five- and ten-year periods. In fact, the Aggressive Growth Fund’s performance for the five- and ten-year periods ranked in the 1st quintile of the Performance Universe. The Board also reviewed performance information provided by the Manager for periods ended June 2005, which showed the Fund outperformed the Lipper category average during the second quarter. The Board discussed with representatives of the Manager the reasons for the Fund’s underperformance compared to the Lipper category average for the one-year period ended March 31, 2005. The Board members noted that the portfolio manager is very experienced with a superior long-term performance record, and expressed their confidence in the portfolio management team. Based on its review, the Board generally was satisfied with the Aggressive Growth Fund’s performance.
Growth & Income Fund — The information comparing the Growth & Income Fund’s performance to that of its Performance Universe, consisting of all underlying variable insurance portfolios classified as “large-cap core funds” by Lipper, was for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended March 31, 2005. The Growth & Income Fund performed below the median for the one- and ten-year periods and slightly below the median for the three-year period. The Fund’s performance for the five-year period was better than the median. The Board also reviewed performance information provided by the Manager for periods ended June 2005, which showed that the Fund performed slightly better than the Lipper category average during the second quarter. The Board discussed with representatives of the Manager the Fund’s investment strategy and the Manager’s efforts to improve the Growth & Income Fund’s performance. Based on its review, the Board generally was satisfied with the Manager’s efforts to improve Growth & Income Fund’s performance, but concluded that it was necessary to continue to closely monitor the performance of the Fund and its portfolio management team.
Management Fees and Expense Ratios
The Board reviewed and considered the contractual management fee (the “Contractual Management Fee”) payable by each Fund to the Manager for investment advisory services and to SBFM for administrative services in light of the nature, extent and quality of the management services provided by the Manager and SBFM. The Board noted that SBFM, and not the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio, pays the sub-investment advisory fee to CAM Ltd. and, accordingly, that the retention of CAM Ltd. as sub-investment adviser to the Fund does not increase the fees and expenses incurred by the Fund.
Additionally, the Board received and considered information comparing the Contractual Management Fee and each Fund’s overall expense ratio with those of funds in both the relevant expense group (the “Expense Group”) and a broader group of funds, each selected and provided by Lipper. The Board also reviewed information regarding the fees the Manager charged its other U.S. clients investing primarily in asset classes similar to those of the Funds including, where applicable, separate accounts. The Manager reviewed with the Board the significant differences in the scope of services provided to the Funds and to these other clients, noting that the Trust is provided with regulatory compliance and administrative services, office facilities and fund officers (including the Trust’s chief
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 109
Board Approval of Management and Subadvisory Agreements (unaudited) (continued)
executive, chief financial and chief compliance officers), and that the Manager coordinates and oversees the provision of services to the Funds by other fund providers. The Board considered the fee comparisons in light of the differences required to manage these different types of accounts. The Board received an analysis of complex-wide management fees provided by the Manager, which, among other things, set out a proposed framework of fees based on asset classes.
Management also discussed with the Board the Funds’ distribution arrangements. The Board was provided with information concerning revenues received by and certain expenses incurred by the Trust’s affiliated distributors and how the amounts received by the distributors are expended.
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio — The information comparing the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio’s Contractual Management Fee as well as its actual total expense ratio to its Expense Group, consisting of 10 underlying variable insurance portfolios (including the Fund) classified as “general bond funds” by Lipper, showed that the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio’s Contractual Management Fee was slightly higher than the median of management fees paid by the other funds in the Expense Group. The Board noted that the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio’s actual total expense ratio was slightly lower than the median of total expense ratios of the other funds in the Expense Group. After discussion with the Board, the Manager offered to institute fee breakpoints effective October 1, 2005, acknowledging that Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio did not yet have enough assets to realize the benefits of the new fee schedule. The Board noted that breakpoints will help reduce the management fee of Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio to the extent Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio’s assets increase to a level at which the breakpoints are triggered.
Equity Index Portfolio — The information comparing the Equity Index Portfolio’s Contractual Management Fee as well as its actual total expense ratio to its Expense Group, consisting of 12 underlying variable insurance portfolios (including the Fund) classified as “S&P 500 index funds” by Lipper, showed that the Equity Index Portfolio’s Contractual Management Fee was higher than the median of management fees paid by the other funds in the Expense Group. The Board noted that the Equity Index Portfolio’s actual total expense ratio also was higher than the median of total expense ratios of the other funds in the Expense Group.
Aggressive Growth Fund — The information comparing the Aggressive Growth Fund’s Contractual Management Fee as well as its actual total expense ratio to its Expense Group, consisting of 10 underlying variable insurance portfolios (including the Fund) classified as “multi-cap growth funds” by Lipper, showed that the Aggressive Growth Fund’s Contractual Management Fee was lower than the median of management fees paid by the other funds in the Expense Group. The Board noted that the Aggressive Growth Fund’s actual total expense ratio was higher than the median of total expense ratios of the other funds in the Expense Group. The Board noted that commencing August 1, 2004, the Manager reduced its Contractual Management Fee and implemented breakpoints and that the full benefit of this adjustment was not reflected in the Lipper Report. After a discussion
110 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Board Approval of Management and Subadvisory Agreements (unaudited) (continued)
with the Board, the Manager offered an additional reduction to the Contractual Management Fee and to institute revised fee breakpoints effective October 1, 2005, acknowledging that Aggressive Growth Fund did not yet have enough assets to realize the benefits of the new fee schedule. The Board noted that breakpoints will help reduce the management fee of Aggressive Growth Fund to the extent Aggressive Growth Fund’s assets increase to a level at which the breakpoints are triggered.
Growth & Income Fund — The information comparing the Growth & Income Fund’s Contractual Management Fee as well as its actual total expense ratio to its Expense Group, consisting of 12 underlying variable insurance portfolios (including the Fund) classified as “large-cap core funds” by Lipper, showed that the Growth & Income Fund’s Contractual Management Fee was lower than the median of management fees paid by the other funds in the Expense Group. The Board noted that the Growth & Income Fund’s actual total expense ratio was higher than the median of total expense ratios of the other funds in the Expense Group. The Board noted that commencing August 1, 2004, breakpoints were added to Growth & Income Fund’s Contractual Management Fee, acknowledging that Growth & Income Fund did not yet have enough assets to realize the benefit of the breakpoint schedule.
Taking all of the above into consideration, the Board determined that the management fee payable with respect to each Fund was reasonable in light of the comparative performance and expense information and the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Fund under the respective Agreement.
Manager Profitability
The Board received and considered a profitability analysis of the Manager and its affiliates in providing services to the Funds. The Board also received profitability information with respect to the CAM fund complex as a whole. In addition, the Board received information with respect to the Manager’s allocation methodologies used in preparing this profitability data as well as a report from an outside consultant that had reviewed the Manager’s methodology. The Board also noted the profitability percentage ranges determined by appropriate court cases to be reasonable given the services rendered to investment companies. With respect to each Fund, the Board determined that the Manager’s profitability was not excessive in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to each Fund.
Economies of Scale
The Board received and considered information regarding whether there have been economies of scale with respect to the management of each Fund, whether the Fund has appropriately benefited from any economies of scale, and whether there is potential for realization of any further economies of scale. The Board considered whether economies of scale in the provision of services to each Fund were being passed along to the shareholders. The Board also considered whether alternative fee structures (such as with breakpoints for those management fees without breakpoints or with additional breakpoints at lower asset
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 111
Board Approval of Management and Subadvisory Agreements (unaudited) (continued)
levels for those management fees with breakpoints) would be more appropriate or reasonable taking into consideration economies of scale or other efficiencies.
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio — The Board noted that the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio had not yet reached the specified asset level at which a breakpoint to its new Contractual Management Fee would be triggered. The Board noted, however, that the new Contractual Management Fee increases the potential for sharing economies of scale with shareholders as the Fund’s assets grow than if no breakpoints were in place. The Board also noted that as the Fund’s assets increase over time, the Fund and its shareholders should realize other economies of scale as certain expenses, such as fixed Fund fees, become a smaller percentage of overall assets. The Board noted that it appeared that the benefits of any economies of scale also would be appropriately shared with shareholders through increased investment in fund management and administration resources.
Equity Index Portfolio — The Board noted that as the Equity Index Portfolio’s assets increased over time, the Fund and its shareholders realized economies of scale as certain expenses, such as fixed Fund fees, became a smaller percentage of overall assets. The Board noted that it appeared that the benefits of any economics of scale also were appropriately shared with shareholders through increased investment in fund management and administration resources.
Aggressive Growth Fund — The Board noted that the Aggressive Growth Fund had not yet reached the specified asset level at which a breakpoint to its Contractual Management Fee would be triggered. The Board noted, however, that the Contractual Management Fee increases the potential for sharing economies of scale with shareholders as the Fund’s assets grow than if no breakpoints were in place. The Board also noted that as the Fund’s assets increase over time, the Fund and its shareholders should realize other economies of scale as certain expenses, such as fixed Fund fees, become a smaller percentage of overall assets. The Board noted that it appeared that the benefits of any economies of scale also would be appropriately shared with shareholders through increased investment in fund management and administration resources.
Growth & Income Fund — The Board noted that the Growth & Income Fund had not yet reached the specified asset level at which a breakpoint to its Contractual Management Fee would be triggered. The Board noted, however, that the Contractual Management Fee increases the potential for sharing economies of scale with shareholders as the Fund’s assets grow than if no breakpoints were in place. The Board also noted that as the Fund’s assets increase over time, the Fund and its shareholders should realize other economies of scale as certain expenses, such as fixed Fund fees, become a smaller percentage of overall assets. The Board noted that it appeared that the benefits of any economies of scale also would be appropriately shared with shareholders through increased investment in fund management and administration resources.
Other Benefits to the Manager
The Board considered other benefits received by the Manager and its affiliates as a result of the Manager’s relationship with the Funds, including any soft dollar arrangements, receipt
112 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Board Approval of Management and Subadvisory Agreements (unaudited) (continued)
of brokerage commissions and the opportunity to offer additional products and services to each Fund’s shareholders.
In light of the costs of providing investment management and other services to the Fund and the Manager’s ongoing commitment to the Funds, the profits and other ancillary benefits that the Manager and its affiliates received were considered reasonable.
Based on their discussions and considerations, including those described above, the Board members approved the Agreement to continue for another year.
No single factor reviewed by the Board was identified by the Board as the principal factor in determining whether to approve the Agreement.
Additional Information
On June 23, 2005, Citigroup Inc. entered into a definitive agreement (the “Transaction Agreement”) with Legg Mason, Inc. under which Citigroup agreed to sell substantially all of its asset management business, CAM, which includes the Adviser of Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio, Equity Index Portfolio, Aggressive Growth Fund and Growth & Income Fund and the subadviser of Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio, to Legg Mason in exchange for the broker-dealer and investment banking businesses of Legg Mason and certain other considerations (the “Transaction”). The Transaction closed on December 1, 2005.
The consummation of the Transaction resulted in the automatic termination of the Fund’s current advisory agreement of Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio, Equity Index Portfolio, Aggressive Growth Fund and Growth & Income Fund and subadvisory agreement of Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio in accordance with the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). Prior to the closing of the Transaction, the Trusts’ Board approved a new management agreement between Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio, Aggressive Growth Fund and Growth & Income Fund and the Adviser and a new advisory agreement between Equity Index Portfolio and the Adviser (the “New Management Agreement”) and a new subadvisory agreement between the Adviser and Citigroup Asset Management Limited, the Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio’s subadviser (the “Subadviser”) (the “New Subadvisory Agreement”) and authorized the Trusts’ officers to submit the New Management Agreement and the New Subadvisory Agreement to shareholders for their approval.
On July 11, 2005, members of the Board discussed with CAM management and certain Legg Mason representatives the Transaction and Legg Mason’s general plans and intentions regarding CAM’s business and its combination with Legg Mason’s business. The Board Members also inquired about the plans for and anticipated roles and responsibilities of certain CAM employees and officers after the Transaction.
At a meeting held on August 1, 2005, the Trust’s Board, including a majority of the Board Members who are not “interested persons” of the Trust or the Adviser as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Board Members”), approved the New Management Agreement and the New Subadvisory Agreement. To assist the Board in its consideration of the New Management Agreement, Legg Mason provided materials and information about
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 113
Board Approval of Management and Subadvisory Agreements (unaudited) (continued)
Legg Mason, including its financial condition, asset management capabilities and organization, and CAM provided materials and information about the Transaction between Legg Mason and Citigroup. To assist the Board in its consideration of the New Subadvisory Agreement, the Board received in advance of their meeting certain materials and information. Representatives of CAM and Legg Mason also made presentations to and responded to questions from the Board. The Independent Board Members, through their independent legal counsel, also requested and received additional information from CAM and Legg Mason in connection with their consideration of the New Management Agreement [and the New Subadvisory Agreement. The additional information was provided in advance of and at the August meeting. After the presentations and after reviewing the written materials provided, the Independent Board Members met in executive session with their counsel to consider the New Management Agreement and the New Subadvisory Agreement. The Independent Board Members also conferred separately and with their counsel about the Transaction on a number of occasions, including in connection with the July and August meetings.
In their deliberations concerning the New Management Agreement, among other things, the Board Members considered:
| |
| (i) the reputation, financial strength and resources of Legg Mason and its investment advisory subsidiaries; |
| (ii) that, following the Transaction, CAM will be part of an organization focused on the asset management business; |
| (iii) that Legg Mason is an experienced and respected asset management firm, and that Legg Mason has advised the Board Members that (a) it may wish to combine certain CAM operations with those of certain Legg Mason subsidiaries; (b) it is expected that these combination processes will result in changes to portfolio managers or portfolio management teams for a number of the CAM funds, subject to Board oversight and appropriate notice to shareholders, and that, in other cases, the current portfolio managers or portfolio management teams will remain in place; and (c) in the future, it may recommend that Legg Mason subsidiaries be appointed as the adviser or subadviser to some or all of the CAM funds, subject to applicable regulatory requirements; |
| (iv) that Legg Mason and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Western Asset Management Company and its affiliates (“Western Asset”), are experienced and respected asset management firms, and that Legg Mason has advised the Board Members that (a) it intends to combine the fixed income investment operations (including money market fund operations) of CAM with those of Western Asset and may also wish to combine other CAM operations with those of other Legg Mason subsidiaries; (b) after the closing of the Transaction, it will take steps to combine the investment management operations of Western Asset with the fixed income operations of the Adviser, which, among other things, may involve Western Asset and the Adviser sharing common systems and procedures, employees (including portfolio managers), investment and trading platforms, and other resources; (c) it is expected |
114 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Board Approval of Management and Subadvisory Agreements (unaudited) (continued)
| |
| that these combination processes will result in changes to portfolio managers or portfolio management teams for a number of the CAM funds, subject to Board oversight and appropriate notice to shareholders, and that, in other cases, the current portfolio managers or portfolio management teams will remain in place; and (d) in the future, it may recommend that Western Asset or other Legg Mason subsidiaries be appointed as the adviser or subadviser to some or all of the CAM funds, subject to applicable regulatory requirements; |
| (v) that CAM management had advised the Board that a number of portfolio managers and other key CAM personnel would be retained after the closing of the Transaction; |
| (vi) that CAM management and Legg Mason have advised the Board that following the Transaction, there is not expected to be any diminution in the nature, quality and extent of services provided to the Funds and their shareholders by the Adviser, including compliance services; |
| (vii) that under the Transaction Agreement, Citigroup and Legg Mason have agreed not to take any action that is not contemplated by the Transaction or fail to take any action that to their respective knowledge would cause any “undue burden” on each Fund’s shareholders under applicable provisions of the 1940 Act; |
| (viii) the assurances from Citigroup and Legg Mason that, for a three-year period following the closing of the Transaction, Citigroup-affiliated broker-dealers will continue to offer the Funds as an investment product, and the potential benefits to each Fund’s shareholders from this and other third-party distribution access; |
| (ix) the division of responsibilities between the Adviser and the Subadviser and the services provided by each of them, and the cost to the Adviser of obtaining those services; |
| (x) the potential benefits to each Fund’s shareholders from being part of a combined fund family with Legg Mason-sponsored funds; |
| (xi) that Citigroup and Legg Mason would derive benefits from the Transaction and that, as a result, they have a financial interest in the matters that were being considered; |
| (xii) the potential effects of regulatory restrictions on the Funds if Citigroup-affiliated broker-dealers remain principal underwriters of the Funds’ after the closing of the Transaction; |
| (xiii) the fact that the Funds’ total advisory and administrative fees will not increase by virtue of the New Management Agreement, but will remain the same; |
| (xiv) the terms and conditions of the New Management Agreement, including the differences from the current advisory agreement, and the benefits of a single, uniform form of agreement covering these services; |
| (xv) that the Funds would not bear the costs of obtaining shareholder approval of the New Management Agreement; |
| (xvi) that the Funds would avail themselves of permissions granted under certain licensing arrangements between Citigroup and Legg Mason that would permit |
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 115
Board Approval of Management and Subadvisory Agreements (unaudited) (continued)
| |
| the Funds (including any share classes thereof) to maintain their current name, as well as all logos, trademarks and service marks, related to Citigroup or any of its affiliates for some agreed upon time period after the closing of the Transaction; and |
| (xvii) that, as discussed in detail above, within the past year the Board had performed a full annual review of the current advisory agreement as required by the 1940 Act. In that regard, the Board, in its deliberations concerning the New Management Agreement, considered the same factors regarding the nature, quality and extent of services provided, costs of services provided, profitability, fall-out benefits, fees and economies of scale and investment performance as it did when it renewed the current advisory agreement, and reached substantially the same conclusions. |
In their deliberations concerning the New Subadvisory Agreement, among other things, the Board Members considered:
| |
| (i) the current responsibilities of the Subadviser and the services currently provided by it; |
| (ii) Legg Mason’s combination plans, as described above; |
| (iii) that CAM management and Legg Mason have advised the Board that following the Transaction, there is not expected to be any diminution in the nature, quality and extent of services provided to the Fund and its shareholders by the Subadviser, including compliance services; |
| (iv) the fact that the fees paid to the Subadviser (which are paid by the Adviser and not the Fund) will not increase by virtue of the New Subadvisory Agreement, but will remain the same; |
| (v) the terms and conditions of the New Subadvisory Agreement, and, the benefits of a single, uniform form of agreement covering these services; |
| (vi) that, as discussed in greater detail above, within the past year the Board had performed a full annual review of the current subadvisory agreement as required by the 1940 Act. In that regard, the Board, in its deliberations concerning the New Subadvisory Agreement, considered the same factors regarding the nature, quality and extent of services provided, costs of services provided, fees and economies of scale and investment performance as it did when it renewed the current subadvisory agreement, and reached substantially the same conclusions. |
| (vii) that the Fund would not bear the costs of obtaining shareholder approval of the New Subadvisory Agreement; and |
| (viii) the factors enumerated and/or discussed above in connection with the approval of the New Management Agreement, to the extent relevant. |
116 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Additional Information (unaudited)
Information about Trustees and Officers
The business and affairs of the Greenwich Street Series Fund (“Trust”) are managed under the direction of the Board of Trustees. Information pertaining to the Trustees and Officers of the Trust is set forth below. Each Trustee and Officer holds office for his or her lifetime, unless that individual resigns, retires or is otherwise removed. The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request by calling Shareholder Services at 1-800-451-2010.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Number of | | |
| | | | Term of | | | | Portfolios | | |
| | | | Office* and | | Principal | | in Fund | | |
| | Position(s) | | Length of | | Occupation(s) | | Complex | | Other Board |
| | Held with | | Time | | During Past | | Overseen by | | Memberships Held |
Name, Address and Birth Year | | Trust | | Served | | 5 Years | | Trustee | | by Trustee |
|
|
|
Non-Interested Trustees: |
Dwight B. Crane Harvard Business School Soldiers Field Morgan Hall #375 Boston, MA 02163 Birth Year: 1937 | | | Trustee | | | Since 1995 | | Professor, Harvard Business School | | | 49 | | | None |
|
Burt N. Dorsett 201 East 62nd Street New York, NY 10021 Birth Year: 1930 | | | Trustee | | | Since 1991 | | President of Dorsett McCabe Capital Management Inc.; Chief Investment Officer of Leeb Capital Management, Inc. (since 1999) | | | 27 | | | None |
|
Elliot S. Jaffe The Dress Barn, Inc. Executive Office 30 Dunnigan Drive Suffern, NY 10901 Birth Year: 1926 | | | Trustee | | | Since 1991 | | Chairman of the Board of The Dress Barn, Inc. | | | 27 | | | The Dress Barn, Inc. |
|
|
Stephen E. Kaufman Stephen E. Kaufman PC 277 Park Avenue, 47th Floor New York, NY 10172 Birth Year: 1932 | | | Trustee | | | Since 1995 | | Attorney | | | 55 | | | None |
|
|
Cornelius C. Rose, Jr. Meadowbrook Village Building 1, Apt. 6 West Lebanon, NH 03784 Birth Year: 1932 | | | Trustee | | | Since 1991 | | Chief Executive Officer of Performance Learning Systems | | | 27 | | | None |
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 117
Additional Information (unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Number of | | |
| | | | Term of | | | | Portfolios | | |
| | | | Office* and | | Principal | | in Fund | | |
| | Position(s) | | Length of | | Occupation(s) | | Complex | | Other Board |
| | Held with | | Time | | During Past | | Overseen by | | Memberships Held |
Name, Address and Birth Year | | Trust | | Served | | 5 Years | | Trustee | | by Trustee |
|
|
|
|
Interested Trustee: | | | | | | | | |
R. Jay Gerken** CAM 399 Park Avenue Mezzanine New York, NY 10022 Birth Year: 1951 | | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | | Since 2002 | | Managing Director of CAM; Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Smith Barney Fund Management LLC (“SBFM”), and Citi Fund Management Inc. (“CFM”); President and Chief Executive Officer of certain mutual funds associated with CAM; Formerly Portfolio Manager of Smith Barney Allocation Series Inc. (from 1996 to 2001) and Smith Barney Growth and Income Fund (from 1996 to 2000); Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Travelers Investment Adviser, Inc. (“TIA”) (from 2002 to 2005) | | | 183 | | | None |
118 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Additional Information (unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Number of | | |
| | | | Term of | | | | Portfolios | | |
| | | | Office* and | | Principal | | in Fund | | |
| | Position(s) | | Length of | | Occupation(s) | | Complex | | Other Board |
| | Held with | | Time | | During Past | | Overseen by | | Memberships Held |
Name, Address and Birth Year | | Trust | | Served | | 5 Years | | Trustee | | by Trustee |
|
|
|
|
Officers: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Andrew B. Shoup CAM 125 Broad Street 11th Floor New York, NY 10004 Birth Year: 1956 | | Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer | | Since 2003 | | Director of CAM; Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of certain mutual funds associated with CAM; Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of certain mutual funds associated with CAM; Head of International Funds Administration of CAM (from 2001 to 2003); Director of Global Funds to Administration of CAM (from 2000 to 2001); Head of U.S. Citibank Funds Administration of CAM (from 1998 to 2000) | | | N/A | | | N/A |
|
Kaprel Ozsolak CAM 125 Broad Street 11th Floor New York, NY 10004 Birth Year: 1965 | | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | | Since 2004 | | Director of CAM; Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of certain mutual funds associated with Citigroup; Controller of certain funds associated with Citigroup (from 2002 to 2004) | | | N/A | | | N/A |
|
Olivier Asselin Citigroup Asset Management Limited (“CAM Ltd”) Citigroup Centre Canada Square Canary Wharf, London E14 5LB Birth Year: 1963 | | Vice President and Investment Officer | | Since 2002 | | Investment Officer of CAM Ltd. | | | N/A | | | N/A |
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 119
Additional Information (unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Number of | | |
| | | | Term of | | | | Portfolios | | |
| | | | Office* and | | Principal | | in Fund | | |
| | Position(s) | | Length of | | Occupation(s) | | Complex | | Other Board |
| | Held with | | Time | | During Past | | Overseen by | | Memberships Held |
Name, Address and Birth Year | | Trust | | Served | | 5 Years | | Trustee | | by Trustee |
|
|
|
|
Kevin Caliendo CAM 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 Birth Year: 1970 | | Vice President and Investment Officer | | Since 2002 | | Managing Director of CAM Investment Officer of Salomon Brothers Assets Management Inc. (“SBAM”) | | | N/A | | | N/A |
|
|
Richard A. Freeman CAM 399 Park Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 Birth Year: 1953 | | Vice President and Investment Officer | | Since 2004 | | Managing Director of CAM and Investment Officer of SBAM | | | N/A | | | N/A |
|
|
John G. Goode CAM One Sansome Street 36th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Birth Year: 1944 | | Vice President and Investment Officer | | Since 1993 | | Managing Director of CAM; Investment Officer of SBFM | | | N/A | | | N/A |
|
|
Martin R. Hanley CAM 399 Park Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 Birth Year: 1965 | | Vice President and Investment Officer | | Since 2001 | | Managing Director of CAM; Investment Officer of SBFM | | | N/A | | | N/A |
|
|
Michael A. Kagan CAM 399 Park Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 Birth Year: 1960 | | Vice President and Investment Officer | | Since 2000 | | Managing Director of CAM; Investment Officer of SBFM | | | N/A | | | N/A |
|
|
John Lau TIMCO 100 First Stamford Place 7th Floor Stamford CT 06902 Birth Year: 1965 | | Vice President and Investment Officer | | Since 2000 | | Investment Officer of TIMCO Asset Management, Inc. (“TIMCO”) | | | N/A | | | N/A |
Daniel Willey TIMCO 100 First Stamford Place 7th Floor Stamford, CT 06902 Birth Year: 1955 | | Vice President and Investment Officer | | Since 1994 | | Investment Officer of TIMCO | | | N/A | | | N/A |
|
|
Alex Romeo TIMCO 100 First Stamford Place 7th Floor Stamford, CT 06902 Birth Year: 1964 | | Vice President and Investment Officer | | Since 1998 | | Investment Officer of TIMCO | | | N/A | | | N/A |
120 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Additional Information (unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Number of | | |
| | | | Term of | | | | Portfolios | | |
| | | | Office* and | | Principal | | in Fund | | |
| | Position(s) | | Length of | | Occupation(s) | | Complex | | Other Board |
| | Held with | | Time | | During Past | | Overseen by | | Memberships Held |
Name, Address and Birth Year | | Trust | | Served | | 5 Years | | Trustee | | by Trustee |
|
|
|
|
Louis Scott TIMCO 100 First Stamford Place 7th Floor Stamford, CT 06902 Birth Year: 1962 | | Vice President and Investment Officer | | Since 1999 | | Investment Officer of TIMCO | | | N/A | | | N/A |
|
|
Roger M. Lavan CAM 399 Park Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 Birth Year: 1963 | | Vice President and Investment Officer | | Since 2002 | | Managing Director of CAM; Investment Officer of SBAM | | | N/A | | | N/A |
|
|
Beth A. Semmel, CFA CAM 399 Park Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 Birth Year: 1960 | | Vice President and Investment Officer | | Since 2002 | | Managing Director of CAM; Investment Officer of SBAM | | | N/A | | | N/A |
|
|
Peter J. Wilby, CFA CAM 399 Park Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 Birth Year: 1958 | | Vice President and Investment Officer | | Since 2002 | | Managing Director of CAM; Chief Investment Officer of SBAM | | | N/A | | | N/A |
|
|
David M. Zahn CAM Ltd Citigroup Centre Canada Square 7th Floor Canary Wharf, London E14 5LB Birth Year: 1970 | | Vice President and Investment Officer | | Since 2002 | | Investment Officer of CAM Ltd | | | N/A | | | N/A |
|
|
John Chiota CAM 100 First Stamford Place 5th Floor Stamford, CT 06902 Birth Year: 1968 | | Chief Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of CAM (since 2004); Chief Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer with certain mutual funds associated with CAM (since 2006); prior to August 2004, Chief AML Compliance Officer with TD Waterhouse. | | | N/A | | | N/A |
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 121
Additional Information (unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Number of | | |
| | | | Term of | | | | Portfolios | | |
| | | | Office* and | | Principal | | in Fund | | |
| | Position(s) | | Length of | | Occupation(s) | | Complex | | Other Board |
| | Held with | | Time | | During Past | | Overseen by | | Memberships Held |
Name, Address and Birth Year | | Trust | | Served | | 5 Years | | Trustee | | by Trustee |
|
|
|
|
Ted P. Becker CAM 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 Birth Year: 1951 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2006 | | Managing Director of Compliance at Legg Mason & Co., LLC, (2005- Present); Chief Compliance Officer with certain mutual funds associated with CAM (since 2006); Managing Director of Compliance at Citigroup Asset Management (2002-2005). Prior to 2002, Managing Director-Internal Audit & Risk Review at Citigroup Inc. | | | N/A | | | N/A |
Steven Frank CAM 125 Broad Street New York, NY 10004 Birth Year: 1967 | | | Controller | | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of CAM (since 2002); Controller of certain mutual funds associated with Citigroup; Assistant Controller of CAM (from 2001 to 2005). | | | N/A | | | N/A |
|
Robert I. Frenkel CAM 300 First Stamford Place 4th Floor Stamford, CT 06902 Birth Year: 1954 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
Secretary | | Since 2003 | | Managing Director and General Counsel of Global Mutual Funds for CAM and its predecessor (since 1994); Secretary and Chief Legal Officer of certain mutual funds associated with CAM | | | N/A | | | N/A |
| | |
*
| | Each Trustee and Officer serves until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified. |
|
**
| | Mr. Gerken is an “interested person” of the Trust as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, because Mr. Gerken is an officer of SBFM and certain of its affiliates. |
122 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Additional Shareholder Information (unaudited)
On November 15, 2005, a Special Meeting of Shareholders was held to elect Trustees. The following table provides the number of votes cast for, authority withheld as well as the number of abstentions.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Authority | | |
Election of Trustees1 | | Votes For | | Withheld | | Abstentions |
|
|
|
Nominees: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dwight B. Crane | | | 143,577,643.247 | | | | 5,339,555.080 | | | | 0.000 | |
Burt N. Dorsett | | | 143,517,903.371 | | | | 5,399,294.956 | | | | 0.000 | |
Elliot S. Jaffe | | | 143,458,316.975 | | | | 5,458,881.352 | | | | 0.000 | |
Stephen E. Kaufman | | | 143,448,491.617 | | | | 5,468,706.710 | | | | 0.000 | |
Cornelius C. Rose, Jr. | | | 143,482,573.616 | | | | 5,434,624.711 | | | | 0.000 | |
R. Jay Gerken | | | 143,426,673.737 | | | | 5,490,524.590 | | | | 0.000 | |
|
Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio
Results of a Special Meeting of Shareholders
On November 15, 2005, a Special Meeting of Shareholders was held for the following purposes: 1) to approve a new management agreement and 2) to approve a new subadvisory agreement. The following table provides the number of votes cast for, against or withheld, as well as the number of abstentions and broker non-votes as to each matter voted on at the Special Meeting of Shareholders.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Votes | | | | Broker |
Item Voted On | | Votes For | | Against | | Abstentions | | Non-Votes |
|
|
|
New Management Agreement | | | 9,225,960.911 | | | | 307,849.153 | | | | 395,829.466 | | | | 0.000 | |
New Subadvisory Agreement | | | 9,215,603.171 | | | | 304,908.753 | | | | 409,127.606 | | | | 0.000 | |
|
Equity Index Portfolio
Results of a Special Meeting of Shareholders
On November 15, 2005, a Special Meeting of Shareholders was held for the following purposes: 1) to approve a new management agreement. The following table provides the number of votes cast for, against or withheld, as well as the number of abstentions and broker non-votes as to each matter voted on at the Special Meeting of Shareholders.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Votes | | | | Broker |
Item Voted On | | Votes For | | Against | | Abstentions | | Non-Votes |
|
|
|
New Advisory Agreement | | | 51,616,707.923 | | | | 1,916,002.153 | | | | 2,291,391.535 | | | | 0.000 | |
|
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 123
Additional Shareholder Information (unaudited) (continued)
Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund
Results of a Special Meeting of Shareholders
On November 15, 2005, a Special Meeting of Shareholders was held for the following purposes: 1) to approve a new management agreement. The following table provides the number of votes cast for, against or withheld, as well as the number of abstentions and broker non-votes as to each matter voted on at the Special Meeting of Shareholders.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Votes | | | | Broker |
Item Voted On | | Votes For | | Against | | Abstentions | | Non-Votes |
|
|
|
New Management Agreement | | | 1,134,516.500 | | | | 28,857.866 | | | | 76,759.267 | | | | 0.000 | |
|
Salomon Brother Variable Aggressive Growth Fund
Results of a Special Meeting of Shareholders
On November 15, 2005, a Special Meeting of Shareholders was held for the following purposes: 1) to approve a new management agreement. The following table provides the number of votes cast for, against or withheld, as well as the number of abstentions and broker non-votes as to each matter voted on at the Special Meeting of Shareholders.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Votes | | | | Broker |
Item Voted On | | Votes For | | Against | | Abstentions | | Non-Votes |
|
|
|
New Management Agreement | | | 1,819,836.540 | | | | 9,047.655 | | | | 11,477.008 | | | | 0.000 | |
|
124 Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report
Important Tax Information (unaudited)
The following information is provided with respect to the distributions paid during the taxable year ended December 31, 2005:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | Equity Index Portfolio | | Growth & Income Fund |
|
|
|
Record Date: | | | 8/18/2005 | | | 12/27/2005 | | | 12/27/2005 | |
Payable Date: | | | 8/19/2005 | | | 12/28/2005 | | | 12/28/2005 | |
Dividends Qualifying for the Dividends Received Deduction for Corporations | | | 100.00% | | | 100.00% | | | 100.00% | |
Please retain this information for your records.
Greenwich Street Series Fund 2005 Annual Report 125
| |
| Greenwich Street Series Fund |
|
TRUSTEES |
Dwight B. Crane Burt N. Dorsett R. Jay Gerken, CFA Chairman Elliot S. Jaffe Stephen E. Kaufman Cornelius C. Rose, Jr. |
|
OFFICERS |
R. Jay Gerken, CFA President and Chief Executive Officer
Andrew B. Shoup Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer Kaprel Ozsolak Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Oliver Asselin Vice President and Investment Officer Kevin Caliendo Vice President and Investment Officer Richard A. Freeman Vice President and Investment Officer Martin R. Hanley Vice President and Investment Officer Michael A. Kagan Vice President and Investment Officer John Lau Vice President and Investment Officer Roger M. Lavan Vice President and Investment Officer |
OFFICERS (Cont’d.) |
Alex A. Romeo Vice President and Investment Officer Beth A. Semmel, CFA Vice President and Investment Officer Louis Scott Vice President and Investment Officer Peter J. Wilby, CFA Vice President and Investment Officer Daniel Willey Vice President and Investment Officer David M. Zahn Vice President and Investment Officer Ted P. Becker Chief Compliance Officer John Chiota Chief Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer Steven Frank Controller Robert I. Frenkel Secretary and Chief Legal Officer |
|
INVESTMENT MANAGERS |
Smith Barney Fund Management LLC |
Salomon Brothers Asset Management Inc |
TIMCO Asset Management, Inc. |
|
ADMINISTRATOR |
Smith Barney Fund Management LLC |
|
DISTRIBUTORS |
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC |
|
CUSTODIAN |
State Street Bank and Trust Company |
|
TRANSFER AGENT |
PFPC Inc. 4400 Computer Drive Westborough, Massachusetts 01581 |
|
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
KPMG LLP 345 Park Avenue New York, New York 10154 |
| | |
This report is submitted for the general information of shareholders of the Greenwich Street Series Fund, but it may also be used as sales literature when proceeded or accompanied by the current prospectus. This report must be preceded or accompanied by a free prospectus. Investors should consider the Funds’ investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about the Funds. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. www.citigroupam.com ©2005 Legg Mason Investors Services, LLC, Member NASD, SIPC
S-6223P (2/06) 06-9665
![(Citigroup Logo)](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-14/0001193125-06-223689/g58442y17096y17096.gif) | | Greenwich Street Series Fund Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio Equity Index Portfolio Salomon Brothers Variable Growth & Income Fund Salomon Brothers Variable Aggressive Growth Fund
The Funds are separate investment funds of the Greenwich Street Series Fund, a Massachusetts business trust.
The Funds file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Funds’ Forms N-Q are available on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. The Funds’ Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington D.C., and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. To obtain information on Form N-Q from the Funds, shareholders can call 1-800-451-2010.
Information on how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 and a description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-451-2010, (2) on the Funds’ website at www.citigroupam.com and (3) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. |