Central European Media Enterprises 10K/A 2002 Annual report (amended)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington,D.C.20549

FORM 10-K/A

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FORM 10-K

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2002

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number 0-24796

CENTRAL EUROPEAN MEDIA ENTERPRISES LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

BERMUDA	N/A
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation and organisation)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
Clarendon House, Church Street, Hamilton	HM CX Bermuda
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 441-296-1431

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Class A Common Stock, $0.08 par value

93/8% Notes Due 2004

81/8% Notes Due 2004

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for each shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) Yes [X] No [ ]

The aggregate market value of the voting stock of registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 3, 2003 was approximately $105 million

Number of shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding as of March 3, 2003 : 9,256,884

Number of shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding as of March 3, 2003 : 3,967,368

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Document	Location in Form 10-K in Which Document is Incorporated
Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 22, 2003	Part III

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This amendment to the Central European Media Enterprises Ltd. Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed on March 10, 2003, is being filed to modify Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for the following typographical processing errors and omissions:

To correct the report date of the unqualified Independent Auditors' Report for Super Plus Holding d.d. by Deloitte & Touche for the year ended 31 December 2001 and period ended 31 December 2000.

To amend the wording of the unqualified Independent Auditors' Report for Super Plus Holding d.d. by Deloitte & Touche to include reference to the statement of stockholders' equity.

To correct the report date of the unqualified Independent Auditors' Report for Produkcija Plus d.o.o. by Deloitte & Touche for the years ended 31 December 2000 and 2001.

To amend the wording of the unqualified Independent Auditors' Report for Produkcija Plus d.o.o. by Deloitte & Touche to include reference to the statement of stockholders' equity and to define Produkcija Plus d.o.o. as the "Company".

To include copies of the Independent Auditors' Reports for Slovenská televízna spolocnost, s.r.o. by Arthur Andersen for the years ended 31 December 2001 and 2000.

These are the only modifications that were made to the Form 10-K Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, as filed on March 10, 2003, and they have no impact on the previously reported consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of Central European Media Enterprises Ltd.

Other than as discussed above, we have not updated the Form 10-K to modify other disclosures in the Form 10-K for events occurring subsequent to the original March 10, 2003, filing date. This Form 10-K/A continues to speak as of March 10, 2003.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

(Financial Statements and Supplementary data begin on the following page and end on the page immediately preceding Item 9.)

Page 2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors of Central European Media Enterprises Ltd.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Central European Media Enterprises Ltd. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, prior to the addition of the transitional disclosures discussed in Note 5, were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors expressed in their report dated March 27, 2002 an unqualified opinion on those statements.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2002, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 5, effective January 1, 2002, the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill and intangible assets upon adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”.

As discussed above, the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. As described in Note 5, these consolidated financial statements have been revised to include the transitional disclosures required by FAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. We audited the transitional disclosures in Note 5. In our opinion, the transitional disclosures for 2001 and 2000 in Note 5 are appropriate. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 or 2000 consolidated financial statements of the Company other than in respect of such disclosures and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2001 or 2000 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

Deloitte & Touche

London, United Kingdom

March 10, 2003

Page 3

This is a copy and does not reflect a reissuance of Arthur Andersen’s Audit Report

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Central European Media Enterprises Ltd:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Central European Media Enterprises Ltd. (a Bermuda corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of Produkcija Plus d.o.o. and Super Plus Holding d.d. (acquired on October 11, 2000) which statements reflect total assets of 21 percent and total revenues of 39 percent in 2001, and 18 percent and 31 percent, respectively in 2000, of the related consolidated totals. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for those entities, is based solely on the reports of the other auditors.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of the other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Central European Media Enterprises Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses and in its cash flow projections is relying on cash inflows that are outside the Company management’s direct control. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also discussed in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN

Hamilton, Bermuda

March 27, 2002

Page 4

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Partners of Produkcija Plus d.o.o.

Ljubljana, Slovenia

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Produkcija Plus d.o.o. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 (not presented separately herein). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

Deloitte & Touche

Ljubljana, Slovenia

February 15, 2002

Page 5

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Partners of Super Plus Holding d.d.

Ljubljana, Slovenia

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Super Plus Holding d.d. and its subsidiary (the "Company"), as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2001 and for the period from October 11, 2000 to December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements, referred to in the first paragraph above, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the consolidated results of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2001 and for the period from October 11, 2000 until December 31, 2000 in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has suffered recurring losses and in its cash flow projections is relying on cash inflows that are outside the Company’s management’s control and depend on the Company’s parent company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Deloitte & Touche

Ljubljana, Slovenia

March 27, 2002

Page 6

CENTRAL EUROPEAN MEDIA ENTERPRISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2002 and 2001

(US$ 000’s, except per share data)

		December 31, 2002		December 31, 2001
ASSETS

Current Assets

	Cash and cash equivalents	$	49,644	$	22,053

	Restricted cash		6,168		3,562

	Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $7, 481, $8,219)		21,357		19,451

	Program rights costs		10,997		8,754

	Advances to related parties		3,842		7,346

	Asset held for sale		5,473		8,679

	Other short-term assets		4,141		5,308


Total current assets			101,622		75,153

	Loans to related parties		7,742		7,276

	Investments in/and advances to unconsolidated affiliates		21,637		21,502

	Property, plant and equipment (net of depreciation of $47,244, $41,225)		14,078		16,642

	Program rights costs		6,982		6,497

	License costs and other intangibles (net of amortization of $9,928, $9,867)		2,144		2,119

	Goodwill (net of amortization of $26,801, $26,590)		18,201		16,811

	Other assets		4,286		5,265


Total Assets		$	176,692	$	151,265

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 7

CENTRAL EUROPEAN MEDIA ENTERPRISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

(US$ 000’s, except share and per share data)

		December 31, 2002			December 31, 2001

LIABILITES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Current Liabilities:

	Short term payables to bank	$	-		$	1,576

	Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		36,856			37,582

	Duties and other taxes payable		18,088			21,127

	Income taxes payable		5,181			602

	Current portion of credit facilities and obligations under capital leases		8,440			10,785

	Investments payable		1,256			1,256

	Advances from related parties		1,361			1,155


Total current liabilities			71,182			74,083

NON-CURRENT LIABILITES

	Long-term portion of credit facilities and obligations under capital leases		20,518			707

	$100,000,000 9 3/8% Senior Notes due 2004		99,964			99,942

	Euro 71,581,961 8 1/8% Senior Notes due 2004		75,036			63,621

	Other liabilities		3,849			1,618


Total non-current liabilities			199,367			165,888

	Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries		2,019			90

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 12)

SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT:

Class A Common Stock $0.08 par value:

Authorized: 100,000,000 shares at December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001; issued and outstanding : 9,256,884 at December 31, 2002 and 2001			740			740

Class B Common Stock $0.08 par value:

Authorized: 15,000,000 shares at December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001; issued and outstanding : 3,967,368 at December 31, 2002 and 2001			318			318

	Additional paid-in capital		360,401			355,591

	Accumulated deficit		(452,011	)		(437,827	)

	Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(5,324	)		(7,618	)


Total shareholders' deficit			(95,876	)		(88,796	)

Total liabilities and shareholders' deficit		$	176,692		$	151,265

All Class A and Class B Common Stock has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock splits which occurred on August 16, 2002 and January 10, 2003.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 8

CENTRAL EUROPEAN MEDIA ENTERPRISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(US$ 000’s, except share and per share data)

		For the Years Ended December 31,
		2002			2001			2000
Net revenues		$	92,602		$	73,238		$	76,813
STATION EXPENSES:
	Operating costs and expenses		36,099			36,323			37,160
	Amortization of programming rights		20,205			12,815			15,994
	Depreciation of station fixed assets and other intangibles		7,751			11,331			24,654
	Write down in value of asset held for sale		3,446			-			-

	Total station operating costs and expenses		67,501			60,469			77,808
	Selling, general and administrative expenses		13,183			19,992			19,402
CORPORATE EXPENSES:
	Corporate operating costs and development expenses		11,357			8,548			8,578
	Net arbitration related (proceeds)/costs		(16,602	)		4,509			2,839
	Stock based compensation		3,754			-			-
	Amortization of goodwill		-			1,747			1,670

Operating income/(loss)			13,409			(22,027	)		(33,484	)
Loss on write down of investment			(2,685	)		-			-
Equity in income/(loss) of unconsolidated affiliates			2,861			7,137			(514	)
Net interest and other expense			(13,912	)		(17,759	)		(18,245	)
Change in fair value of derivative			1,108			(1,576	)		-
Gain on sale of subsidiaries			-			1,802			-
Foreign currency exchange gain/(loss), net			(10,231	)		1,651			(2,286	)
Gain on sale of investment			-			-			17,186
Gain on discharge of obligation			-			5,188			-

Income/(loss) before provision for income taxes, minority interest and discontinued operations			(9,450	)		(25,584	)		(37,343	)
Provision for income taxes			(4,135	)		(1,381	)		(96	)

Income/(loss) before minority interest and discontinued operations			(13,585	)		(26,965	)		(37,439	)
Minority interest in (income)/loss of consolidated subsidiaries			(599	)		2,138			(59	)

Net income/(loss) from continuing operations			(14,184	)		(24,827	)		(37,498	)

Discontinued operations: Gain on disposal of discontinued operations (Hungary)			-			2,716			-

Net income/(loss)		$	(14,184	)	$	(22,111	)	$	(37,498	)

PER SHARE DATA:
	Net income/(loss) per share
	Continuing operations - Basic and Diluted	$	(1.07	)	$	(1.88	)	$	(2.84	)
	Discontinued operations - Basic and Diluted		-			0.21			-

	Total	$	(1.07	)	$	(1.67	)	$	(2.84	)

Weighted average common shares used in computing per share amounts:
	Basic and Diluted (‘000s)		13,224			13,224			13,220

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 9

CENTRAL EUROPEAN MEDIA ENTERPRISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT

(US$ 000’s)

	Comprehensive Income/(Loss)	Class A Common Stock	Class B Common Stock	Additional Paid-In Capital	Accumulated Deficit	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)	Total Shareholders' Surplus/ (Deficit)

BALANCE,December 31, 1999		185	79	356,385	(378,218)	(13,667)	(35,236)
Stock Dividends		555	239	(794)			-
Comprehensive income/(loss):
Net income/(loss)	(37,498)				(37,498)		(37,498)
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
Unrealized translation adjustments	6,856					6,856	6,856

Comprehensive income/(loss)	(30,642)

Stock issued:
Capital contributed by shareholders		-	-	-	-	-	-


BALANCE,December 31, 2000		740	318	355,591	(415,716)	(6,811)	(65,878)

Comprehensive income/(loss):
Net income/(loss)	(22,111)				(22,111)
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
Unrealized translation adjustments	(807)					(807)	(807)

Comprehensive income/(loss)	(22,918)

Stock issued:
Capital contributed by shareholders		-	-	-	-	-	-


BALANCE,December 31, 2001		740	318	355,591	(437,827)	(7,618)	(88,796)

Stock Based Compensation				3,754			3,754

Warrants Issued				1,048			1,048
Comprehensive income/(loss):
Net income/(loss)	(14,184)				(14,184)		(14,184)
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
Unrealized translation adjustments	2,294					2,294	2,294
Comprehensive income/(loss)	(11,890)

Stock issued:
Capital contributed by shareholders		-	-	8	-	-	8


BALANCE,December 31, 2002		$ 740	$ 318	$ 360,401	$ (452,011)	$ (5,324)	$ (95,876)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 10

CENTRAL EUROPEAN MEDIA ENTERPRISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (US$ 000’s)

			2002			2001			2000
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income/(loss)			$	(14,184	)	$	(22,111	)	$	(37,498	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
	Equity in income/(loss) of unconsolidated affiliates			(2,861	)		(7,137	)		514
	Depreciation and amortization			29,194			26,674			42,864
	Loss on write down of investment			2,685			-			-
	Loss on write down of assets held for resale			3,446			-			-
	Gain on discharge of obligation			-			(5,188	)		-
	Gain on disposal of investment			-			-			(17,186	)
	Stock based compensation			3,754			-			-
	Minority interest in loss of consolidated subsidiaries			599			(2,138	)		59
	Foreign currency exchange loss/(gain), net			10,231			(1,651	)		2,286
	Net change in:
		Accounts receivable		(826	)		3,819			(7,967	)
		Program rights costs		(23,280	)		(15,647	)		(15,518	)
		Advances from affiliates		163			1,855			10,756
		Other short-term assets		787			7,876			2,238
		Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		1,480			(7,093	)		4,736
		Short term payables to bank		(1,576	)		1,576			-
		Income and other taxes payable		1,472			2,091			(813	)

Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities				11,084			(17,074	)		(15,529	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

	Other investments			(271	)		-			(13,163	)
	Cash proceeds from disposal of discontinued operations			-			-			4,416
	Cash proceeds from disposal of investments			-			-			37,250
	Restricted cash			(2,606	)		(2,110	)		3,161
	Acquisition of fixed assets			(2,690	)		(2,333	)		(617	)
	Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets			536			2,371			-
	Loans and advances to affiliates			3,243			6,892			(8,171	)
	License costs, other assets and intangibles			(584	)		730			(3,360	)

Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities				(2,372	)		5,550			19,516

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Borrowings on credit facilities and payments under capital leases			16,803			(5,899	)		(2,087	)
	Receipts from/(payments to) minority shareholders			1,320			2,070			(311	)
	Capital contributed by shareholders			8			-			-
	Other long-term liabilities			(70	)		-			-

Net cash received from/(used in) financing activities				18,061			(3,829	)		(2,398	)

IMPACT OF EXCHANGE RATE FLUCTUATIONS ON CASH				818			(104	)		(1,069	)

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents				27,591			(15,457	)		520
CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period				22,053			37,510			36,990
CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period			$	49,644		$	22,053		$	37,510


SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for interest			$	14,536		$	15,106		$	16,664
Cash paid for income taxes (net of refunds)			$	326		$	261		$	623
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION OF NON-CASH FINANCING TRANSACTIONS:
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment under capital lease			$	-		$	344		$	195

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 11

CENTRAL EUROPEAN MEDIA ENTERPRISES LTD

1. ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

Central European Media Enterprises Ltd. ("CME"), a Bermuda corporation, was formed in June 1994. CME's assets are held through a series of Dutch and Netherlands Antilles holding companies. CME, together with its Subsidiaries (CME and its Subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the "Company"), invests in, develops, and operates national and regional commercial television stations and networks in Central and Eastern Europe.

Romania

Operating Companies : MPI and Media Vision

The Company's interest in its Romanian operation is governed by a Co-operation Agreement (the "Romanian Agreement") among the Company, Adrian Sarbu and Ion Tiriac, forming Media Pro International S.A. ("MPI"), through which PRO TV, Acasa and PRO TV International are operated. MPI provides programming to and sells advertising for the stations which comprise the PRO TV, Acasa and Pro TV International networks.

Pursuant to the Romanian Agreement, the Company owns 66% of the equity of MPI. Interests in profits of MPI are equal to the partners' equity interests. The Company has the right to appoint three of the five members of the Council of Administration which directs the affairs of MPI. Although the Company has majority voting power in MPI, with respect to certain fundamental financial and corporate matters, the affirmative vote of either Mr. Sarbu or Mr. Tiriac is required.

With specific reference to MPI, the certain financial and corporate matters which require approval of the minority shareholders are in the nature of "protective" rights which are not an impediment to consolidation for accounting purposes.

In addition, in Romania, the Company owns 70% of Media Vision SRL ("Media Vision"), a production and subtitling company. On November 22, 2001 the Company sold its 70% interest in Video Vision International SRL ("Video Vision"), a Romanian post-production company and the gain recognized on this sale was $1.8 million.

License Companies : PRO TV Srl and Media Pro Srl

The Company owns 49% of the equity of PRO TV, Srl which holds 19 of the 22 licenses for the stations which comprise the PRO TV, Acasa and Pro TV International network. Messrs. Sarbu and Tiriac own substantially all of the remainder of PRO TV, Srl. The remaining three licenses for the PRO TV network together with the licenses for the PRO FM and PRO AM radio networks are held by Media Pro Srl, in which the Company holds 44% of the equity. The remainder is owned by Messrs. Sarbu and Tiriac.

Slovenia

Operating Company : Pro Plus

Pro Plus provides programming to and sells advertising for the broadcast licenseholders POP TV d.o.o and Kanal A.d.d. as well as additional affiliates. Following the receipt by Pro Plus of an approval from the Ministry of Culture of Slovenia to own more than 20% of two broadcasters, the Company has restructured its Slovenian operations. As of January 30, 2003 the Company owns 96.85% of the equity in Pro Plus and has a corresponding economic interest. This ownership interest is subject to registration in the Commercial Registry of Slovenia. Prior to January 30, 2003 the Company owned 78% of the equity in Pro Plus and an effective economic interest of 85.5%.

Page 12

In connection with the restructuring of its Slovenian operations, the Company has entered into a put/call arrangement with the general director of Pro Plus, Marijan Jurenec, who owns the remaining 3.15% of Pro Plus. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Jurenec generally has the right to put his interest to CME for a one year period beginning on December 31, 2004 at a price that consists of a fixed component and a variable component. CME has the right to call the interest held by Mr. Jurenec at any time until December 31, 2006 at a price that is the same as the put price until the end of 2005 and is fixed during 2006 after which the call expires.

License Companies : POP TV d.o.o and Kanal A

As of January 30, 2003, Pro Plus owns 100% of the equity of POP TV d.o.o. POP TV holds all of the licenses for the Slovenian operations apart from those effectively held by Kanal A. Pro Plus has entered into an agreement with POP TV, under which Pro Plus provides all programming to POP TV and sells its advertising.

The Company controls the operations, economics and the programming of Kanal A, which is the second leading commercial television broadcaster in Slovenia. 90% of the equity interest in Kanal A is being held by Superplus Holding d.d. (“Superplus”) which is owned by individuals who are holding the share of Superplus in trust for the Company. As of January 30, 2003, Pro Plus owns the remaining 10% of Kanal A. Pro Plus has entered into an agreement with Kanal A, under which Pro Plus provides all programming to Kanal A and sells its advertising.

SlovakRepublic

Operating Company : STS

The Company's interest in Slovenska Televizna Spolocnost, s.r.o.("STS") is governed by a Participants Agreement (the "Slovak Agreement") between the Company and Markiza-Slovakia s.r.o. ("Markiza") forming STS. Pursuant to the Slovak Agreement, the Company is required to fund all of the capital requirements of, and holds a 49% voting interest and a 70% economic interest in, STS. Markiza, which holds the television broadcast license, and STS have entered into a series of agreements under which STS is entitled to conduct television broadcast operations pursuant to the license. On an ongoing basis, the Company is entitled to 70% of the profits of STS, except that the Company's share in STS' profit shall be increased by 3% for every additional $1 million invested in STS by the Company. A Board of Representatives directs the affairs of STS, the composition of which includes two designees of the Company and three designees of Markiza. All significant financial and operational decis ions of the Board of Representatives require a vote of 80% of its members. In addition, certain fundamental corporate matters are reserved for decision by a general meeting of partners and require a 67% affirmative vote of the partners.

License Company : Markiza

On January 18, 2002, the Company entered into an interest participation transfer agreement to acquire a 34% interest in Markiza. As a result of this acquisition, the Company will generally be entitled to 70% of STS' profits as opposed to 80% prior to the acquisition. The Company now has the right to appoint one of three authorized co-signatories of Markiza, which gives CME a blocking control over Markiza's significant activities. The ownership transfer to the Company was approved by the Slovak Republic Media Council at its meeting on February 11, 2002. The transfer was registered with the Slovak Commercial Registry on March 13, 2002.

As a result of the change in the Company’s entitlement to distribution of profits, the Company has charged the Consolidated Statement of Operations with $2,685,000 in the first quarter of 2002, to reflect the reduction in the economic interest based on the Company’s value of the investment as at December 31, 2001.

Page 13

Ukraine

Operating Companies : Innova, IMS

The Studio 1+1 Group consists of several entities in which the Company holds direct or indirect interests. The Company owns a 60% equity interest in each of Innova Film GmbH ("Innova") and International Media Services ("IMS"). Innova holds 100% of Inter-Media, a Ukrainian company, which in turn holds a 30% equity interest in Studio 1+1, the license holding company in Ukraine.

Ukraine Advertising Holding B.V. (“UAH”), where the Company owned a 60% equity interest, was dissolved in June 2002 following the registration of the sale of its shares in Prioritet, the main vehicle for advertising sales up until January 1 2001, where UAH held a 50% interest.

Innova provides programming and production services to Studio 1+1 Ltd, the license holding company. From January 1, 2001, the sale of Studio 1+1 Ltd’s advertising air time has been out-sourced to Video International (“VI”), in which the Company has neither an economic nor a voting interest.

License Company : Studio 1+1

Current Ukrainian legislation limits direct foreign equity holdings in broadcasting companies to 30%. At present the Company’s interest in Studio 1+1 Ltd is, indirectly, 18%. Existing agreements commit all the shareholders of Studio 1+1 to increase the direct holding of the Company, or one of its subsidiaries, when legislation permits this.

All significant decisions of the entities in the Studio 1+1 Group are taken by the shareholders, requiring a majority vote (other than decisions of the shareholders of Studio 1+1 Ltd, the license holding company, which require a 75% vote). Certain fundamental corporate matters of the other entities require 61% shareholder approval.

CzechRepublic

The Company owns a 93.2% voting and economic interest in Ceska nezavisla televizni spolecnost, spol. s.r.o. ("CNTS"). In January 1993, CET 21, spol. s.r.o. ("CET") was awarded a terrestrial television broadcast license in the Czech Republic. On January 31, 2002 the Nova license was extended until 2017. CET was awarded that license with the full knowledge and understanding of the Czech Republic Media Council that CEDC (the Company’s direct predecessor in interest) was a direct participant in the license application. With the involvement of the Czech Republic Media Council, the Company and CET entered into a Memorandum of Association and Investment (the “Memorandum of Association”) that provided for the creation of a company, CNTS, to operate and broadcast the planned television station. An associated agreement further provided that CET did not have the authority to broadcast without the direct participation of CEDC. Between 1993 and August 1999, CNT S performed essentially all of the activities associated with operating and broadcasting Nova TV.

On August 5, 1999, CET pre-empted CNTS's transmission and began broadcasting a substitute signal for Nova TV from a site other than CNTS’s studios. In addition, on the same day, CNTS received notification from CET that CET was withdrawing from the Cooperation Contract. CET has continued to pre-empt all of CNTS’s programming for Nova TV. As a result of this situation, CNTS has been unable to generate revenues and its operations have been suspended. On September 9, 1999, the Company announced the suspension of technical and production operations at CNTS and CNTS has since dismissed a majority of the employees.

The Company and Ronald S. Lauder, the non-executive Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors, have sought remedies in a number of court and arbitration proceedings. The Company is seeking various forms of relief, reinstatement of its status and rights, and of costs incurred and damages sustained during or as a result of this dispute.

It is the Company’s intention to sell its Czech assets during 2003. The sale of these assets will trigger repayment of a loan of $8,304,000 currently not otherwise due until 2005.

Page 14

2. FINANCING OF OPERATING AND CAPITAL NEEDS

The Company had cash of $49,644,000 at December 31, 2002 to enable it to finance its future activities compared to $22,053,000 as at December 31, 2001.

In 2002, cash (including CNTS dividends, inter-company charges, repayment of related party personal loans and net advances) received from the Company's subsidiaries and partners for 2002 was $18,418,000 compared to $17,570,000 for 2001. In addition to this, the Company received an amount of $28,953,000 owed by Dr. Zelezny pursuant to the final order of the ICC Arbitration Tribunal. (See Note 18. “Net Arbitration Related (Proceeds)/Costs”).

The Company's future cash needs, over and above working capital requirements, will depend on the Company's overall financial performance and its future acquisition and development decisions. The Company believes that, taken together, its current cash balances, internally generated cash flow, the sale of Czech Republic assets and local financing of broadcast operations should result in the Company having adequate cash resources to meet its debt service and other financial obligations for the next 12 months.

The Senior Notes in the amount of $175,000,000 mature in August 2004. The Company’s ability to refinance or repay the Senior Notes will depend upon market conditions, pending litigation, renewals of broadcasting licenses, the financial performance of the Company and other factors through August 2004.

Financing arrangement with GoldenTree Asset Management

On July 31, 2002 CME Media Enterprises BV, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, agreed to new additional financing by way of a facility of up to $30 million provided by affiliates of GoldenTree Asset Management LLC. The Company drew down the first $15 million tranche on August 5, 2002 and has an option to draw down an additional tranche of $15 million. The loan matures on June 15, 2004 with the facility of early repayment at the option of the Company. The principal terms of the loan are as follows:-

Compensation is payable in the form of interest, commitment and draw-down fee, and the issuance of warrants on any draw date. Any warrants issued are at an exercise price equal to the average price of Company shares of the last 26 days of trading prior to the closing of the financing.

Interest is applied at 12% per annum to any balances drawn down. A commitment fee of 1.5% on $30 million was paid on signing and a draw down fee of 1.5 % of the borrowed amount was paid on the first draw-down. A 1.5% fee will be payable on any additional draw-down.

On draw down of the first tranche of $15 million, 348,000 new share warrants were issued. In the event of a further $15 million draw down a further 348,000 new warrants will be issued. In the event of early repayment, the Company at its option may make a cash payment or issue additional warrants, to a maximum of 348,000 additional warrants per $15 million of draw down, so that a 40% annual rate of return inclusive of the interest of 12% is achieved. At maturity the Company, to meet its obligation of providing a 40% annual rate of return inclusive of 12% interest, may issue additional warrants up to a maximum of 348,000 additional warrants per $15 million of draw down.

The financing agreement contains negative covenants, including those restricting the Company’s ability to incur additional debt, make new investments, pledge assets or sell assets other than in the normal course of business.

Security has been provided in the form of guarantees and pledges. Guarantees have been provided by the Company and Central European Media Enterprises N.V. Pledges, which are exerciseable in the event of default, secure the shares of CME Media Enterprises B.V., CME Ukraine B.V., CME Slovenia B.V. and CME Romania B.V.

Page 15

The Company has accounted for this financing in compliance with Paragraph 16 of APB 14, Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants (“APB 14”). Under APB 14, the Issuance and Repayment Warrants must be fair valued at the time of commitment. The fair valuation as at the date of completion has been determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair valuation the warrants was $1,048,000.

Dividends from Consolidated Subsidiaries and Unconsolidated Affiliates

The laws under which CME's operating Subsidiaries are organized provide generally that dividends may be declared by the partners or shareholders out of yearly profits subject to the maintenance of registered capital, required reserves and after the recovery of accumulated losses. In the case of the Company's Dutch and Netherlands Antilles Subsidiaries, the Company's voting power is sufficient to compel the making of distributions. In the case of PRO TV, distributions may be paid from the profits of PRO TV subject to a reserve of 5% of annual profits until the aggregate reserves equal 20% of PRO TV's registered capital. A majority vote can compel PRO TV to make distributions. In Slovenia it may be paid from the profits of Pro Plus, subject to a reserve equal to 10% of registered capital being established from accumulated profits. In the case of Markiza TV, distributions may be paid from net profits subject to an initial reserve requirement of 5% of net profits but not more than 10% of re gistered capital. Subsequently, the reserve requirement is equal to 5% of net profits until the reserve fund equals 10% of registered capital. The Company cannot compel the distributions of dividends by Markiza TV. The Company's voting power in the Studio 1+1 Group is sufficient to compel the distribution of dividends. To date, the only Subsidiary to distribute dividends has been CNTS which suspended operations on August 5, 1999.

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The significant accounting policies are summarized as follows:

Principles of Consolidation

The financial statements of entities which are controlled by the Company are consolidated. Entities which are not controlled but over which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence are accounted for using the equity method. Consequently, the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries and the results of the Romanian, Slovenian, and certain entities of the Ukraine operations , and the Czech Republic (the "Consolidated Affiliates"), as consolidated entities and reflect the interests of the minority owners of these entities for the periods presented, as applicable. The results of the Slovak Republic and the license companies in Romania and Slovenia and certain entities of the Ukrainian operations, (the "Unconsolidated Affiliates") in which the Company has, or during the periods presented had, minority or non-controlling ownership interests, are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements using the equity method.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues primarily result from the sale of advertising time and are recognized in the period in which advertising is aired. The Company’s policy is that discounts and agency commission are recognized in the period in which the advertising is aired and are reflected as a reduction in net revenue.

Barter Transactions

Revenue from barter transactions (television advertising time provided in exchange for goods and services) is recognized as income when commercials are broadcast, and programming, merchandise or services received are charged to expense or capitalized as appropriate when received or used in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard (“FAS”) FAS 63.

Page 16

The Company records barter transactions at the estimated fair market value of goods or services received. If merchandise or services are received prior to the broadcast of a commercial, a liability is recorded. Likewise, if a commercial is broadcast by the Company's station prior to receiving the merchandise or services, a receivable is recorded.

The Company has certain related party barter arrangements in place in Romania. Under US GAAP these are accounted for at fair market value. Due to the limited local market for many specialist television services in Romania, and as many of the companies providing these services are related parties, the Company has devised a method to value programs received. This methodology takes into account the average cost per hour of acquired programming to MPI as well as the time at which the bartered programming is shown.

Cash and cash equivalents

All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are classified as cash and cash equivalents. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents approximates the amounts shown on the financial statements. Cash and cash equivalents consist of unrestricted cash and short-term investments.

Impairment of Long-lived assets

The Company periodically evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets in accordance with FAS No 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. The carrying values of long-lived assets are considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flows from such assets are less than their carrying values. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. Fair value is determined using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale are determined in a similar manner, except that fair values are reduced by the cost to dispose of such assets.

Program Rights and Production Costs

Program rights acquired by the Company under license agreements and the related obligations incurred are recorded as assets and liabilities when the program is available and the license period begins. The assets are amortized by 100% on a first showing, apart from certain prime time feature films which are amortized by 90% for the first run and 10% for the second run. The unamortized cost of such rights and liability for future payments under these agreements are included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Amortization estimates for program rights are reviewed periodically and adjusted accordingly.

Payments made for program rights in which the license period has not begun before the year end are classified as prepaid expenses.

Production costs for self-produced programs are expensed when first broadcast.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the Company's excess cost over the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but is assessed for impairment on an annual basis in accordance with FAS No. 142.

Intangible assets include broadcast licenses and license acquisition costs.

Broadcast license costs and license acquisition costs reflect the costs of acquiring licenses to broadcast. The intangible assets are deemed to have an infinite life and are not amortized. However, they are assessed for impairment on an annual basis in accordance with FAS No. 142.

Page 17

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company accounts for the fair value of financial instruments in accordance with FAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”. To meet the reporting requirements of FAS No. 107, the Company calculates the fair value of financial instruments and includes this additional information in the notes to financial statements when the fair value is different from book value of those financial instruments. The Company uses quoted market prices whenever available to calculate these fair values. When quoted market prices are not available, the Company uses standard pricing models for various types of financial instruments which take into account the present value of estimated future cash flows.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method as set forth in FAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts which are more likely than not to be realized.

Foreign Currency

The reporting currency of the Company is the US dollar. The financial statements of the Company’s operations whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar are translated from such functional currency to U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date for assets and liabilities, and at weighted average rates for the period for revenues and expenses, including gains and losses. Translational gains and losses are accumulated within a separated component of shareholders’ equity while transactional gains and losses are recognised in the Statement of Operations.

Where appropriate, the Company may hedge a designated portion of the exposure to foreign exchange gains and losses on the translation of specific foreign operations. Hedging instruments used by the Company can include foreign currency denominated debt, foreign currency swaps and foreign currency forward contracts that are denominated in the same currency as the hedged foreign operations.

Use Of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting year. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Capital Leases

Assets acquired under capital leases, and offsetting capital lease obligations, are stated at the lesser of the present value of the minimum lease payments less executory costs and the asset’s fair value at the inception of the lease term. Minimum lease payments are allocated between capital lease obligation reductions and interest expense so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the obligation.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for its compensatory stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB 25”), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. The Company has issued stock options with exercise prices equal to the market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant. (see Note 11, "Stock Option Plans").

Page 18

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications were made to prior period amounts to conform to current period classifications.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company accounts for the fair value of derivative instruments in accordance with FAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". FAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. FAS No. 133 requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Special accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivative's gains and losses to offset related results on the hedged item in other comprehensive income, and requires that a company must formally document, designate, and assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting.

4. TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLITS

On August 5, 2002 a duly authorized committee of the Board approved a two-for-one stock split by way of the issue of one pari-passu bonus share in respect of each share of Class A or Class B Common Stock. This applied to stockholders as at the record date of August 16, 2002. Payment has been made in full by way of a transfer from the share premium account on August 26, 2002.

On December 16, 2002 a duly authorized committee of the Board approved an additional two-for-one stock split by way of the issue of one pari-passu bonus share in respect of each share of Class A or Class B Common Stock. This applied to stockholders as at the record date of December 30, 2002 and the additional share was distributed on January 10, 2003.

Both of the two-for-one stock splits: (i) had no effect on the par value of the company’s Class A and Class B Common Stock; (ii) increased the value of the authorized share capital of the Company’s Class A Common Stock from $185,138 to $740,552; and (iii) increased the value of the authorized share capital of the Company’s Class B Common Stock from $79,347 to $317,388.

All share and per share information in this Form 10-K has been retroactively adjusted to reflect both two-for-one stock splits.

5. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Effective with the adoption of FAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, on January 1, 2002, goodwill is no longer subject to amortization over its estimated useful life. Goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment of impairment by applying a fair-value-based test. The Company completed its initial assessment of goodwill impairment in the second quarter of 2002, and its annual assessment in the fourth quarter of 2002, which resulted in no impairment charges. The Company assesses goodwill impairment in the fourth quarter of each year.

Goodwill arose on the acquisitions of the Company’s operations in Slovenia and Ukraine. It represents the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets received. The carrying value is reviewed for impairment on an annual basis.

The following transitional pro forma financial information reflects net income and diluted earnings per share as if goodwill and certain intangibles were not subject to amortization for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001 and 2000.

Page 19

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2001		For the Year Ended December 31, 2000

	Net Income/(Loss)	Net Income/(Loss) per	Net Income/(Loss)	Net Income/(Loss) per
	(US$ 000’s)	Share	(US$ 000’s)	Share

Amounts as reported	$ (22,111)	$ (1.88)	$ (37,498)	$ (2.84)
Amortization, net of income taxes	1,747	0.13	1,670	0.13
Total	$ (20,364)	$ (1.75)	$ (35,828)	$ (2.71)

As no amortization expense was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2002, pro forma net loss and pro forma loss per share are equal to reported net loss and loss per share for the year.

The gross amount and accumulated amortization of amortizable intangible assets as at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 was as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2002 (US$ 000’s)
	Gross Amount		Accumulated			Net Amount
			Amortization

License costs and other intangibles:
License acquisition cost	$	5,758	$	(4,252	)	$	1,506
Broadcast license cost		2,203		(2,033	)		170
Software license cost		4,109		(3,641	)		468

Total	$	12,070	$	(9,926	)	$	2,144


Goodwill
Slovenian operations	$	20,146	$	(6,041	)	$	14,105
Ukrainian operations		22,096		(18,000	)		4,096
Other		-		-			-

Total	$	42,242	$	(24,041	)	$	18,201

Page 20

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2001 (US$ 000’s)
	Gross Amount		Accumulated			Net Amount
			Amortization

License costs and other intangibles:
License acquisition cost	$	6,592	$	(5,086	)	$	1,506
Broadcast license cost		3,043		(2,889	)		154
Software license cost		2,352		(1,893	)		459

Total	$	11,987	$	(9,868	)	$	2,119


Goodwill
Slovenian operations	$	18,545	$	(5,830	)	$	12,715
Ukrainian operations		22,096		(18,000	)		4,096

Other		-		-			-

Total	$	40,641	$	(23,830	)	$	16,811

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2000 (US$ 000’s)
	Gross Amount		Accumulated			Net Amount
			Amortization

License costs and other intangibles:
License acquisition cost	$	5,357	$	(4,367	)	$	990
Broadcast license cost		440		(327	)		113
Software license cost		2,970		(1,915	)		1,055

Total	$	8,767	$	(6,609	)	$	2,158


Goodwill
Slovenian operations	$	19,515	$	(3,589	)	$	15,926
Ukrainian operations		22,096		(17,180	)		4,916

Other		8,968		(8,901	)		67

Total	$	50,579	$	(29,670	)	$	20,909

Page 21

6. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. It consists of the following:

			December 31

	Useful Lives		2002			2001

	Years		US$ 000’s			US$ 000’s

Land and buildings		25-50	$	9,949		$	8,903
Station machinery, fixtures and equipment		4-8		47,171			44,587
Other equipment		3-8		3,971			2,216
Construction in progress		-		231			2,161

				61,322			57,867
Less - Accumulated depreciation				(47,244	)		(41,225	)

			$	14,078		$	16,642


Assets held under capital lease
Cost			$	1,048		$	999

Depreciation				(167	)		(96	)

Net Book Value			$	881		$	903

In addition to the above assets, the asset held for sale relates to the Company’s building and other remaining assets in the Czech Republic.

7. OTHER ASSETS

Other assets consist of the following:

		December 31,

		2002		2001

		US$ 000’s		US$ 000’s

Current:
	VAT recoverable	$	118	$	318
	Other		4,023		4,990

		$	4,141	$	5,308


Long term:
	Satellite transponder deposits	$	852	$	773
	(See Note 12, “Commitments and Contingencies”)
	Capitalized debt costs		2,184		2,451
	Other		1,250		2,041

		$	4,286	$	5,265

Capitalized debt costs represent the costs incurred in connection with obtaining debt financing. These costs are amortized over the life of the related debt instrument under the interest method.

Page 22

8. INCOME TAXES PAYABLE

The following is a reconciliation of income taxes, calculated at statutory Netherlands rates, to the income tax provision included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2002:

	For the Year Ended December 31 (US$ 000’s)
	2002

Income taxes at Netherlands Rates (35% for all years)	$	(3,308	)
Difference between Netherlands rates and rates applicable to international subsidiaries		4,378
Income tax credits		-
Change in valuation allowance		65
Other (Netherlands tax settlement)		3,000

Income Tax Provision	$	4,135

The following table shows the significant components included in deferred income taxes as at December 31:

		For the Year Ended December 31, (US$ 000’s)
		2002
Assets:
	Tax benefit of loss carry forwards and other tax credits	$	18,498
	Property, plant and equipment		-

Liabilities:
	Property, plant and equipment		(268	)


Gross deferred income tax assets		$	18,230

Valuation allowance:			(18,230	)


Net deferred income tax assets / (liability):		$	Nil

The Company has a total of nil net deferred income assets, carried for use in future years. The Company has a total of $18,230,000 gross deferred income tax assets that can be carried forwards, which are scheduled to expire between 2003 and 2007.

The Company has provided a valuation allowance on these deferred income tax assets of $18,230,000 as at December 31, 2002 since it has been deemed more likely than not that the benefits associated with these assets will not be realized.

Page 23

9. INVESTMENTS PAYABLE

	December 31

	2002		2001

	US$ 000’s		US$ 000’s

Short Term:

Payable to other	$	1,256	$	1,256

Included in the $1,256,000 are amounts due in respect of investments made in prior periods.

10. LOAN AND OVERDRAFT OBLIGATIONS

Group loan obligations and overdraft facilities consist of the following:

			December 31,

			2002			2001

			US$ 000’s			US$ 000’s

CME B.V.
	GoldenTree Asset Management Facility	(a)	$	14,193		$	-
	Ceska Sporitelna Loan	(b)		8,304			7,028

Romanian Operations
	Long-term loan	(c)		-			989
	Overdraft Facility	(d)		-			2,660
Slovenian Operations
	Long-term loan	(e)		5,643			-
	Capital lease, net of interest, and unsecured short-term loans			582			530
Ukrainian Operations
Capital lease, net of interest, and unsecured short-term loans		(f)		236			285

Less current maturities				(8,440	)		(10,785	)

			$	20,518		$	707

CME B.V.

(a) On July 31, 2002 CME Media Enterprises BV, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, agreed to new additional financing by way of a facility of up to $30 million provided by affiliates of GoldenTree Asset Management LLC. The Company drew down the first $15 million tranche on August 5, 2002 and has an option to drawn down an additional tranche of $15 million. The loan matures on June 15, 2004 has a fixed interest rate of 12% and has a facility of early repayment at the option of the Company. For further details, see Note 2. “Financing of operating and capital needs”.

Page 24

(b) On August 1, 1996, the Company entered into an agreement for the purchase of the 22% economic interest of Ceska Sporitelna Bank ("CS") in CNTS and virtually all of CS's voting rights in CNTS for a purchase price of Kc 1 billion (approximately $33 million). The Company has also entered into a loan agreement with CS to finance 85% of the purchase price which is secured by an assignment of a dividend receivable by the Company from CNTS. The loan which had an outstanding principal balance at December 31, 2002 of Kc 249,764,513 (approximately $8.3 million) and matures November 2005 has been restructured. The agreement provides for the Company paying approximately $150,000 in interest payments each quarter with a balloon payment of the principal in November 2005. This loan bears a variable interest rate of the Prague Inter-Banking Official Rate (“PRIBOR”) plus 3.5%. As at December 31, 2002 a rate of 6.25% applied to this loan. This loan has been classified as a curre nt liability as a consequence of a decision to sell the Czech Republic building in 2003, on which this loan is secured.

Romania

(d) The overdraft facility which was obtained from Tiriac Bank and matured in October 2002 was fully paid.

Slovenia

(e) In December, 2002 Pro Plus entered into a Euro 8,000,000 (approximately $8.4 million) loan agreement with BACA and Nova Ljubljanska banka d.d. which matures in February, 2009. This loan is secured by the real property, fixed assets and receivables of Pro Plus. During the term of the loan, Pro Plus is required to keep EUR 900,000 (approximately $0.9 million) on deposit with BACA. On December 19, 2002, the Company drew down Euro 5 million (approximately $5.3 million). This loan bears a variable interest rate of the European Inter-Banking Official Rate (“EURIBOR”) plus 3%. As at December 31, 2002 a rate of 6% applied to this loan.

Ukraine

(f) In 2001 Innova signed a lease agreement for uplink transmission equipment. The capital lease matures in 2005 and bears interest at a rate 10%.

Total Group

At December 31, 2002, maturities of debt, excluding Senior Notes, are as follows:

	Total US$ 000’s

2003	$	-
2004		14,193
2005		8,304
2006		-
2007		-
2008		-
2009		5,208

Total	$	27,705

Page 25

It is the Company’s intention to sell its remaining Czech assets during 2003. The sale of these assets will trigger repayment of $8,304,000 currently not due until 2005.

Loan Notes payable

On August 20, 1997, the Company issued Senior Notes of $100,000,000 at 9 3/8% and Euro 71,581,961 ($75,349,000) at 8 1/8%, due 2004 (collectively the "Senior Notes"). The Senior Notes are unsecured senior indebtedness of the Company and rank pari passu with all existing and future unsecured unsubordinated indebtedness of the Company and are effectively subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness of the Company's subsidiaries.

The Senior Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at any time on or after August 15, 2003 at the redemption prices set forth below.

	Dollar Note			Euro Note

	Redemption Price			Redemption Price


2003 and thereafter		100	%		100	%

Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on each February 15 and August 15, commencing February 15, 1998. Interest expense on the US dollar denominated Senior Notes and Euro denominated Senior Notes for the year ended December 31, 2001 was $9,375,000 and Euro 5,845,945 (approximately $6.1 million), respectively. The Company made the semi-annual interest payments on the Senior Notes which were due on February 15, 2002, August 15, 2002 and February 15, 2003.

The indentures pursuant to which the Senior Notes were issued contain certain restrictive covenants, which among other things, restrict the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to: (i) incur additional indebtedness, (ii) pay dividends or make certain other distributions, (iii) make certain investments and other restricted payments, (iv) enter into certain transactions with affiliates, (v) create liens, (vi) sell assets and also create restrictions on the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to make certain payments to the Company. Management believes that, as of December 31, 2002, the Company was in compliance with such restrictive covenants.

The fair value of the Senior Notes as at December 31, 2002 was $88,000,000 with regard to the $100,000,000 9 3/8% Senior Notes and Euro 62,276,000 (approximately $65.5 million) with regard to the Euro 71,581,961 8 1/8% Senior Notes. These are approximate values as the market for these bonds is illiquid. The Company does not record these at market value because the Company is obligated to pay the Senior Notes in full in August 2004.

Debt of Unconsolidated Affiliates

In addition to the above, two non-consolidated entities of the Company have loans.

(1) As at December 31, 2002, Studio 1+1, an 18% owned affiliate of the Company and the license holder within the Studio 1+1 Group, had $2.3 million outstanding on loan with Va Bank in Ukraine. This loan matures in November 2003 and bears interest at 16%. By way of security, Inter-Media, one of the consolidated entities of the Studio 1+1 Group, has pledged fixed assets in the amount of $1,100,000 and 4,864 minutes of advertising time (nominal value of $1,000 per minute).

(2) A Slovak bank, Vseobecna uverova banka a.s.,( “VUB”), has lent STS s.r.o., a 49% owned subsidiary of the Company, SKK 150 million (approximately $3,750,000), a facility supported by charges over the assets and receivables of STS s.r.o. This has been partly used by STS to lend cash to the Company and will offset future payments of dividends in the order of SKK 90 million (approximately $2,250,000), thereby improving cashflow to the Company. The facility is provided by way of a loan to STS of up to SKK 100 million (approximately $2,500,000) and by way of an overdraft facility of up to SKK 50 million (approximately $1,250,000). Repayments by STS are due to the lender by way of six-monthly instalments of SKK 5 million (approximately $125,000) commencing on June 25, 2003 and ending on December 20, 2005 on which date an additional balloon payment of SKK 70 million (approximately $1,750,000) is due. Interest is payable monthly and is variable based on a calculation of 1.7% over BRIBOR. A facility fee of SKK 350,000 (approximately $9,000) was paid. The overdraft is available for the period from July 18, 2002 to July 16, 2003 when it is repayable in full. Interest is debited monthly and is variable based on a calculation of 1.7% over BRIBOR. A facility fee of SKK 175,000 (approximately $4,000) is payable.

Page 26

Debt with Unconsolidated Affiliate

STS s.r.o has agreed a loan to the Company for SKK187million (approximately $4.7 million). The first tranche of SKK100 million ($2.5 million) was drawn down on August 2, 2002. A second and third tranche of SKK 20 million (approximately $500,000) each were drawn down on January 27, 2003 and February 24, 2003. The Company has requested a fourth and fifth draw down of SKK 20 million (approximately $500,000) and SKK 27 million (approximately $675,000) in March 2003 and April 2003, respectively.

11. STOCK OPTION PLANS

The Company may award employee stock options under two plans. The Company adopted the 1994 Stock Option Plan approved by the shareholders. When the 1994 plan approached being fully utilized the Company adopted the 1995 Stock Option Plan on August 2 1995 also approved by shareholders. This plan has been amended and restated a number of times, most recently on May 17, 2001 ("Revised and Restated 95 Stock Option Plan"). Under the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the compensation committee is authorized to grant options up to 450,000 shares of Class A Common Stock. Under the Revised and Restated 95 Stock Option Plan the Compensation Committee is authorized to grant options for up to 1,600,000 shares of the Company's Class A or Class B Common Stock. The maximum term of the options granted under both of the Stock Option Plan is ten years. Options granted may be either incentive stock options under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), or non-qualified stock options.&n bsp; Under the 1995 Amended Stock Option Plan, non-affiliated directors are automatically granted each year options to purchase 5,000 shares of Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock. On March 22, 2001, the Board of Directors agreed to increase the number of options automatically granted to non-affiliated directors to 8,000 shares effective from the 2001/2002 AGM period.

Under both the 1994 Stock Option Plan and the Revised and Restated 95 Stock Option Plan the option exercise price is either equal to or greater than the stock's market price on the date of grant. The non-affiliate director A class options are granted at the average price for the ten business days preceding the grant of the option and the B class options are granted at 105% of the A class option price. Options granted under either the 1994 Stock Option Plan or the Revised and Restated 95 Stock Option Plan can have vesting periods of up to five years and expire, at the latest, after ten years.

On September 18, 1998, the Company adopted the Stock Appreciation Rights Plan. This plan allows the Company to grant up to 500,000 Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs). The SARs are subject to the same vesting and other general conditions as options granted under the Revised and Restated 95 Stock Option Plan. When the SARs are exercised the employees will receive in cash the amount by which the Company’s stock price exceeds the exercise price at the time of exercise, if any, rather than purchase the Company’s shares. No SARs were granted in the year ended December 31, 2002; 8,500 SARs were granted in 1998 and are still exercisable. No amount has been charged to the Statement of Operations in respect of these SARs in any year.

A summary of the status of the Company's two stock option plans at December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 and changes during the years 2002, 2001, and 2000 are presented in the table and narrative below. The following table does not include the SARs and no compensation costs were required to be recognized in the current year.

Page 27

		December 31, 2002

	Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price $	Option Price $
Outstanding at start of year	1,037,458	15.12	0.31 – 67.00
Granted	233,000	4.15	3.92 – 4.28
Exercised	(5,000)	1.67	1.67
Forfeited	(13,600)	45.03	40.00 – 46.00

Outstanding at end of year	1,251,858	12.81	0.31 – 67.00

		December 31, 2001

	Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price $	Option Price $
Outstanding at start of year	979,998	18.56	0.40 – 67.00
Granted	124,000	0.34	0.31 – 0.53
Exercised	(3,500)	0.40	0.40
Forfeited	(63,040)	40.38	22.88 – 67.00

Outstanding at end of year	1,037,458	15.12	0.31 – 67.00

		December 31, 2000

	Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price $	Option Price $
Outstanding at start of year	1,237,816	37.16	0.40 – 67.00
Granted	693,000	2.97	2.97
Exercised	-	-	-
Forfeited	(950,818)	31.42	1.67 – 67.00

Outstanding at end of year	979,998	18.56	0.40 – 67.00

At December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 839,158, 581,748 and 398,064 options were exercisable, respectively.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following assumptions used:

Date of Option Grant		Average Risk Free Interest Rate

1 April 2002 – 3 year rate		4.29%
15 May 2002 – 5 year rate		4.59%

Expected dividend yields are assumed to be 0% for each grant; expected lives range from 4 to 9 years; expected stock price volatility of 82%, 94%, and 178.9% for 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. 2002 volatility is calculated on monthly closing prices to reflect the underlying volatility, given the illiquid market.

The weighted average fair value of each option granted in 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $3.08, $0.30 and $2.85, respectively.

The Company accounts for these plans as fixed plans under APB No. 25, under which no compensation cost was recognized for stock options granted to employees with an exercise price at or above the prevailing market price on the date of the grant. Had compensation costs for these plans been determined consistent with the fair value approach required by FAS No. 123, the Company's net loss and net loss per common share would increase to the following pro forma amounts:

Page 28

		Year Ended December 31, (US$ 000’s, except per share data)

			2002		2001		2000


Net Loss from continuing operations	As Reported		(14,184	)	(24,827	)	(37,498	)
	Pro Forma		(14,823	)	(25,500	)	(40,150	)
Net income/(Loss) from discontinued operations	As Reported		-		2,716		-
	Pro Forma		-		2,716		-
Net Loss	As Reported		(14,184	)	(22,111	)	(37,498	)
	Pro Forma		(14,823	)	(22,784	)	(40,150	)
Net Loss Per Common Share from ($)	As Reported		(1.07	)	(1.88	)	(2.84	)
Continuing operations - basic and diluted	Pro Forma		(1.12	)	(1.93	)	(3.04	)
Net Loss Per Common Share from ($)	As Reported		-		(0.21	)	-
Discontinued operations - basic and diluted	Pro Forma		-		(0.21	)	-
Total net Loss Per Common Share ($)	As Reported		(1.07	)	(1.67	)	(2.84	)
Basic and Diluted	Pro Forma		(1.12	)	(1.72	)	(3.04	)

The effects of applying FAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure may not be indicative of future amounts because FAS No. 123 does not apply to stock options granted prior to January 1, 1995 and additional stock option grants are anticipated in future years.

Stock Based Compensation

In March 2000 the Board of Directors, acting without the participation of Fred T. Klinkhammer, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee cancelled all previously granted options to acquire shares of Class A Common Stock, which had been granted under employment agreements. The Compensation Committee then awarded Fred T. Klinkhammer the option to acquire shares of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the market price on that day. The new award was approved by the shareholders at the 2000 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.

This modification resulted in variable accounting for the replacement award for the remainder of the award’s life. The change from a fixed to a variable plan results in a compensation charge to the Statement of Operations reflecting the difference in the market price of the options, at the reporting date, less the option strike price for the number of options vested.

In accordance with FIN 44, the Company has charged $3,754,000 to the Statement of Operations in 2002.

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

CZECH REPUBLIC

The Company owns a 93.2% voting and economic interest in Ceska nezavisla televizni spolecnost, spol. s.r.o. ("CNTS"). In January 1993, CET 21, spol. s.r.o. ("CET") was awarded a terrestrial television broadcast license in the Czech Republic. This license, which was extended in January 2002, expires in January 2017. CET was awarded the license with the full knowledge and understanding of the Council of the Czech Republic for Radio and Television Broadcasting (the “Media Council”) that CEDC (the Company’s direct predecessor in interest) was a direct participant in the license application. With the involvement of the Media Council, the Company and CET entered into a Memorandum of Association and Investment (the “Memorandum of Association”) that provided for the creation of a company, CNTS, to operate and broadcast the planned television station. An associated agreement further provided that CET did not have the authority to broadcast without the direct participation of CEDC. Between 1993 and August 1999, CNTS performed essentially all of the activities associated with operating and broadcasting Nova TV. Nova TV became one of the most successful television stations in Europe.

Page 29

In 1996 and 1997, however, under compulsion resulting from proceedings initiated by the Media Council, the Company and CET amended the Memorandum of Association and entered into other contracts to reflect the change in the Memorandum of Association. One such contract (the “Cooperation Contract”) expressly identified CET as the license holder and the “television broadcasting operator” of TV Nova. Pursuant to the Cooperation Contract CNTS prepared, completed and delivered television programming that was then distributed by CET, which broadcast the Nova TV signal. CNTS also collected all of Nova TV's advertising and other revenues, and retained the balance of those revenues net of Nova TV's operating expenses less Kc 100,000 (US $2,600) per month payable to CET.

On August 5, 1999, CET pre-empted CNTS's transmission and began broadcasting a substitute signal for Nova TV from a site other than CNTS’s studios. In addition, on the same day, CNTS received notification from CET that CET was withdrawing from the Cooperation Contract due to CNTS's alleged failure to supply CET with the daily program log for Nova TV on August 4, 1999. CET representatives also stated publicly that, in future, CET would not use CNTS to provide services for Nova TV. CET has continued to pre-empt all of CNTS’s programming for Nova TV. CET carried out these actions with the active support and encouragement of the Media Council. CNTS believes that CET's withdrawal from the Cooperation Contract was not legally effective since CNTS did not materially breach the Cooperation Contract and that the Cooperation Contract therefore remains in effect.

Exclusivity Case

On August 9, 1999 CNTS filed an action with the Regional Commercial Court in Prague requesting a determination that CET 21’s termination of the Cooperation Contractt with CNTS is invalid and that CET 21 is obliged to co-operate in broadcasting TV NOVA exclusively with CNTS. The Cooperation Contract was the fundamental document establishing since 1997 the exclusive co-operation between CET 21 and CNTS in broadcasting TV NOVA. The Regional Commercial Court issued a favorable ruling on May 4, 2000 which was subsequently reversed by a December 14, 2000 ruling from the High Court. That ruling was then upon the extraordinary appeal of CNTS cancelled by the Supreme Court and the matter was returned to the first instance court for further proceedings, by which the matter was effectively opened fully again. On July 4, 2002 the City Court of Prague refused CNTS’s request saying that the relief sought was not sufficiently specified by CNTS for the Court to rule on it. C NTS filed an appeal on August 5, 2002.

Transfer of CET 21’s Shares in CNTS

On June 30, 1999, CNTS filed an action with the Regional Commercial Court of Prague requesting that the court declare invalid an agreement between CET and another Czech company, Produkce, a.s. under which CET purported to transfer CET's 1% participation interest in CNTS to Produkce, a.s., since that transfer did not comply with the CNTS Memorandum of Association. The Court determined that the transfer was invalid; CET and Produkce have appealed and the appeal was rejected. CET and Produkce have filed an extraordinary appeal.

ICC Arbitration

On April 26, 1999, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company filed an arbitration claim against Dr. Vladimir Zelezny before the International Chamber of Commerce Court of Arbitration in Paris, France (the “ICC Arbitration”). The Company sought the return of US $23,350,000 paid to Dr. Zelezny, plus interest, and other unspecified damages, based on breaches by Dr. Zelezny of a share purchase agreement entered into in 1997 under which the Company purchased from Dr. Zelezny Nova Consulting, a company owned by him whose sole asset was a 5.8% interest in CNTS. The Company also sought the forgiveness of the US $5,188,000 unpaid balance of the purchase price under the 1997 share purchase agreement.

Page 30

As a result of an enforcement of the award in the Czech Republic, CME Media Enterprises B.V. has collected $90,901.52 and CZK 262,139,400 (approximately $8,697,000). Furthermore, on September 22, 2002 CME Media Enterprises BV received an additional $20,240,000 from MEF Media Akciova Spolecnost ("MEF") without specification of the title of such payment ("MEF payment"). On December 13, 2002 CME Media Enterprises BV has returned the Nova Consulting shares to a representative of Dr. Zelezny, which resulted in a reduction of CME’s shareholding in CNTS to 93.2%.

Lauder UNCITRAL Arbitration

On August 23, 1999, Ronald S. Lauder, the non-Executive Chairman of the Company's Board of Directors, instituted arbitration proceedings against the Czech Republic under the 1992 Bilateral Investment Treaty between the United States and the Czech Republic. Mr. Lauder initiated the proceedings in his personal capacity as a U.S. national who owns or controls (by virtue of his voting control over the Company) an investment in the Czech Republic. The claim asserted that the Czech Republic harmed Mr. Lauder's investment in CNTS by, among other things, taking unfair and discriminatory actions by reversing its initial approval of an exclusive relationship between CNTS and CET, and by failing to act to remedy the effects of the improper actions of Dr. Zelezny. Mr. Lauder sought monetary damages arising from harm caused to CNTS by the Czech Republic's actions.

On September 3, 2001, the UNCITRAL Tribunal in Mr. Lauder's arbitration issued a final award, finding that the Czech Republic committed a breach of its obligation under the U.S.-Czech Bilateral Investment Treaty to refrain from arbitrary and discriminatory measures when, in early 1993, the Czech Media Council changed its original position allowing Mr. Lauder to make an equity investment in the television license holder (CET) and insisted that Mr. Lauder's participation could be made only through a joint venture company (CNTS). However, the Tribunal denied Mr. Lauder's claim for a declaration that the Czech Republic committed further breaches of the Treaty and denied all of Mr. Lauder's claims for damages. The Tribunal ordered that each party should bear its own legal costs and that the costs of the arbitration should be borne equally by the parties.

CME UNCITRAL Arbitration

On February 22, 2000, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company instituted arbitration proceedings against the Czech Republic under the 1991 Bilateral Investment Treaty between the Netherlands and the Czech Republic (“CME Uncitral Arbitration”).

On September 13, 2001, the Tribunal in this arbitration issued a final partial award on liability, finding that, by the actions and inactions of the Czech Media Council in 1996 and 1999, the Czech Republic violated several provisions of the Netherlands-Czech Bilateral Investment Treaty, including the obligation not to deprive an investor of its investment. The Tribunal ruled that the Czech Republic is obligated to remedy the injury that the Company suffered as a result of its violations of the Treaty by payment of the fair market value of the Company’s investment as it was before consummation of the Czech Republic’s breach of the Treaty in 1999, in an amount to be determined at a second phase of the arbitration. The Tribunal further ordered the Czech Republic immediately to pay US $1,008,000 to the Company as a refund to the Company of its legal costs and expenditures and of its payments of the Tribunal’s fees and disbursements. The hearings to quantify CME's damage s took place in London between September 2 and September 13, 2002. The evidentiary records have been closed, and all testimony was taken at the September hearing. The closing argument in the Quantum Phase was heard from November 11 to November 14, 2002 in London, and it is expected that a final award will be issued by the Tribunal by the end of the first quarter of 2003.

CME has submitted to the Tribunal evidence claiming US $526.9 million less certain adjustments for residual value arising from the sale of Czech assets and the sale of 5.8% interest in CNTS as a result of the payment of the ICC Award by Zelezny. CME also claims interest at 12% from August 1999.

On March 6, 2003, the Tribunal informed the parties to the Arbitration “that the Arbitrators have finished their deliberations and will render the Final Award shortly”.

Page 31

The Collateral Challenge

The Czech Republic has filed a collateral challenge of the final partial award in the Swedish courts. The Czech Republic alleges in their collateral challenge that their party appointed arbitrator was not allowed to fully participate in the deliberations leading to the Partial Final Award, that Czech law was not given precedence and should have been, and that the entire matter had already been dealt with by the London based tribunal in the Lauder arbitration and should not have been heard again on the basis of the principal of res judicata. The Czech Republic also argues in its pleadings that the Tribunal acted beyond its mandate in a number of ways including by declaring that in the quantum phase of the hearings CME's damages should correspond with the fair market value of the destroyed CNTS investment, instead of just finding the Czech Republic liable and leaving all other questions for this phase. All of these claims are in the Company's opinion incorrect as matters of fact or law an d have been raised by the Czech Republic solely for the purpose of attempting to delay enforcement of any award. The hearing in Stockholm, Sweden commenced on March 3, 2003 and is scheduled to last until April 3, 2003.

UKRAINE

In our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company reported that AITI, a television station in Ukraine, commenced a second court action in Ukraine against the Ukraine Media Council challenging certain aspects of the granting to Studio 1+1 of its television broadcast license in Ukraine. Studio 1+1 was involved in this litigation as a third party acting together with the Ukraine Media Council. The claim was almost identical to one which was previously brought by AITI and was dismissed on April 5, 2001 by the Supreme Arbitration Court of Ukraine.

AITI’s allegations were that Studio 1+1 has, in effect, been granted two licenses by the Ukraine TV Council, entitling it to in excess of 32 hours of broadcast time a day on Ukraine's nationwide Channel N2 (UT-2). Further, AITI alleged that Studio 1+1 never paid the required license fee. On February 1, 2002, the Economic Court of the City of Kiev ruled in AITI's favor. The Ukraine Media Council, Studio 1+1, and the Public Prosecutor’s Office of Kiev, the latter two acting as interested third parties, appealed the Economic Court's decision to the Kiev Economic Court of Appeal.

The Kiev Economic Court of Appeal upheld the Economic Court of Kiev’s decision of February 1, 2002. This decision was appealed to the Court of Cassation, the same court that ruled in favor of Studio 1+1 on April 5, 2001. On November 1, 2002 the Court of Cassation ruled that the decisions taken by the two lower courts had not fully taken into consideration all the facts surrounding the matter before reaching judgment and ordered that the case be returned to the Arbitration Court of Kiev. The first hearing took place on February 5, 2003 and was adjourned until February 18, 2003. The next court hearing is scheduled for March 19, 2003. Studio 1+1, as an interested third party, has filed a request with the Supreme Court of Ukraine to accept an appeal of the Court of Cassation decision. If the appeal is accepted, the Supreme Court will be asked to annul the ruling of the Court of Cassation and to terminate these legal proceedings in favor of Studio 1+1 and the Ukraine Media C ouncil.

The Company believes that the claim brought by AITI is groundless and will assist in the pursuit of the defense of this matter vigorously. If the decision in the Ukraine court system is ultimately unfavorable, it could result in the loss of the broadcast license of Studio 1+1.

ROMANIA

The Company was involved in a dispute with a minority shareholder in MPI, Mr. Tiriac, during 2002. As part of this dispute, Mr. Tiriac and his representatives commenced three court actions against MPI. At the request of Mr. Tiriac’s lawyers all of these cases were suspended toward the end of 2002 and are in the process of being formally withdrawn. The withdrawal of these court actions was part of an overall agreement reached between Mr. Tiriac and Mr. Sarbu under which Mr. Tiriac agreed to sell his shareholdings in MPI and the Romanian license holding companies in exchange for a multi-year series of payments from Mr. Sarbu.

Page 32

SLOVENIA

On November 20, 2002, the Company received notice of a claim filed by Zdenka Meglic, the founder and a former shareholder of MMTV, against MMTV, a subsidiary of CME Slovenia BV. Mrs. Meglic is claiming damages against MMTV in the amount of SIT 190 million (approximately US $ 859,000).

During the period from 1992 to 1994, Mrs. Meglic advanced monies to MMTV. Mrs. Meglic, who was the sole shareholder of MMTV at that time, contends these advances were shareholder loans. In 1995, Mrs. Meglic sold CME a 10% interest in MMTV, which at that time was part of the broadcasting network comprising POP TV. At the end of 1996, CME agreed to terms that effectively resulted in the buyout of the remaining interest in MMTV held by Mrs. Meglic in consideration of US $5,000,000. Prior to the closing of that transaction in the first quarter of 1997, Mrs. Meglic entered into a loan agreement with MMTV, represented by her husband General Director Marijan Meglic, that ostensibly consolidated the advances made from 1992 to 1994 into a single loan. During the summer of 2002, Mrs. Meglic demanded repayment of the advances plus accrued interest. MMTV sought clarification from Mrs. Meglic of the amounts in dispute. Subsequently, Mrs. Meglic filed suit.

In her claim against MMTV, Mrs. Meglic is seeking damages in the amount of SIT 190 million (approximately US $859,000) for repayment of monies advanced to MMTV from 1992 to 1994 (in the amount of approximately SIT 29 million (approximately US $131,000)) plus accrued interest. The Company believes Mrs. Meglic’s claim is without merit and will defend the claim vigorously.

The Company is, from time to time, a party to litigation that arises in the normal course of its business operations. Other than those claims discussed above, the Company is not presently a party to any such litigation which could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on its business or operations.

Financial Commitments — Existing Entities

The Company's existing operations are expected to be self-supporting in terms of funding during 2002, with cash being available through local credit facilities and/or generated from operations.

Satellite Costs

In June 1995 the Company obtained leasehold rights for a 12 year period to a 33 MHz transponder on the Eutelsat Hot Bird 3 satellite ("Hot Bird 3"), which launched in October 1997. The Company has paid a deposit of $350,000 against this operating lease. The annual charge for the lease is Euro 3,443,000 (approximately $3.6 million). Provided that the contract does not terminate before the expiration date (September 2009), the deposit is repayable to the Company by deduction from the final two invoices.

In October 1997, the Company obtained leasehold rights for an approximate 12 year period to a 16.5 MHz transponder on the Eutelsat Hot Bird 5 satellite ("Hot Bird 5"), which launched in November 1998. The Company has paid a deposit of Euro 475,000 (approximately $0.5 million) against this operating lease. The annual charge for the lease is Euro 1,900,000. This contract was due to terminate in October 2010; however, in January 2003, the Company terminated this commitment on payment of Euro 1,900,000 (approximately $2 million).

Licenses

The Company believes that the licenses for the television license companies will be renewed prior to expiry. In Romania, the Slovak Republic and Slovenia local regulations do contain a qualified presumption for extensions of broadcast licenses; however, there can be no assurance that any of the licenses will be renewed upon expiration of their initial term. The failure of any such license to be renewed could adversely affect the results of the Company’s operations. However, to date, licenses have been renewed in the ordinary course of business. Access to the available frequencies is controlled by regulatory bodies in each country in which the Company operates.

Page 33

Currency exchange rate fluctuation

The Company and its subsidiaries generate revenues and incur expenses in a variety of currencies. Fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies may cause U.S. dollar translated amounts to change in comparison with previous periods. Other than as described below under "Foreign Exchange Contracts", the Company has not hedged against fluctuations in foreign currency rates. Due to the number of currencies involved, the constantly changing currency exposures and the fact that all foreign currencies do not fluctuate in the same manner against the U.S. dollar, the Company cannot anticipate the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on its financial condition.

Foreign Exchange Contracts

In limited instances, the Company enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency transactions for periods consistent with its identified exposures. At December 31, 2002, there were no foreign exchange contracts outstanding.

Station Programming Rights Agreements

The Company had programming rights commitments for$5,760,000 in respect of future programming which includes contracts signed with license periods starting after December 31, 2002.

Operating Lease Commitments

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 the Company paid aggregate rent on all facilities of $826,000, $1,250,000, and $1,178,000 respectively. Future minimum operating lease payments at December 31, 2002 for non-cancellable operating leases with remaining terms in excess of one year (net of amounts to be recharged to third parties) are payable as follows:

	At December 31, 2002 (US$ 000’s)

2003	$	1,443
2004		633
2005		633
2006		633
2007		538
2008 and thereafter		2,674

Total	$	6,554

Page 34

13. INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO AFFILIATES

The Company holds the following investments in unconsolidated affiliates.

	CME Voting Interest			As at December 31, 2002(US$ 000’s)		As at December 31, 2001(US$ 000’s)
STS		49	%	$	20,469	$	21,483
CET 21		3.125	%		277		6
Tele 59		10	%		889		-
Other		-			2		13

				$	21,637	$	21,502

14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Related party transactions involve transactions between the Company and its stations, shareholders and partners and transactions between the stations and their shareholders and partners.

	At December 31, (US$ 000’s)
	2002		2001
Consolidated Balance Sheet Items - Current Assets

Advances to related parties
Boris Fuchsmann	$	1,000	$	1,600
Adrian Sarbu		-		170
Affiliates of Media Vision		13		96
Affiliates of Innova and Studio 1+1		1,188		1,004
Affiliates of POP TV		647		700
Affiliates of POP TV d.o.o.		45		-
Other		949		3,776

	$	3,842	$	7,346


Consolidated Balance Sheet Items - Non-Current Assets

Loans to related parties
Boris Fuchsmann	$	2,838	$	2,850
Inter Media s.r.l.		1,302		1,302
Media Pro Pictures		1,347		1,347
Other		2,255		1,777

	$	7,742	$	7,276

Page 35

Consolidated Balance Sheet Items - Current Liabilities

Amounts due from related parties
Tele 59	$	77	$	39
MMTV		-		253
Marijan Jurenec		-		25
Affiliates of MPI		1,022		552
Affiliates of Media Vision		262		286

	$	1,361	$	1,155

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 57 (FAS 57), “Related Party Disclosures”, sets forth the requirements under GAAP concerning transactions with related parties. Item 404 of Regulation S-K requires disclosure of certain relationships and transactions with related parties.The Company complies with this directive.

Notwithstanding that compliance, the Company has considered whether investors would better understand financial statements if the financial statements included descriptions of all material transactions involving related persons or entities. The Company has also considered the need for disclosure about parties that fall outside the definition of "related parties," but with whom the Company or its related parties have a relationship that enables the parties to negotiate terms of material transactions that may not be available from other, more clearly independent, partieson an arm's-length basis.

There is a limited local market for many specialist TV services in the countries in which the Company operates. Therefore, the Company does not feel it is possible to provide an assurance that fair market prices and payment terms are in place for such services, many of which are provided by parties known to be connected to or friendly with the Company’s local partners. The Company continues to review all of these arrangements.

There are a number of agreements between license and service companies for the sale of air time and the purchase of programming. These agreements are disclosed in Note 1, “Organization and Business”. A number of partners have loans from the Company or are shareholders in companies to which loans have been made. (See table above).

Accordingly, the following disclosure is made:

Romania

The Company has a number of transactions and arrangements with companies owned or connected to Adrian Sarbu, one of the local partners and General Director of MPI. The total purchases from companies owned by or connected to Mr Sarbu in 2002 were approximately $4.4 million (2001 : $11.1 million). The total sales to companies owned or connected to Mr Sarbu in 2002 were approximately $1.0 million (2001 : $1.8 million). The company also made sales to companies indirectly connected to Mr Sarbu and as at December 31, 2002 these companies had an outstanding balance due to the Company of $2,687,000 (2001 : 2,807,000).

The shareholders of MPI have unanimously approved resolutions requiring a higher level of review and control over related party transactions. The Board of MPI has reviewed all material services currently contracted with both third parties and related parties and has brought these services in house where cost saving made this appropriate.

Page 36

The Company’s internal control procedures have highlighted that, without the Company’s prior approval, advertising time was bartered to businesses related to our partner Mr. Sarbu. This barter was in exchange for certain programming rights. The Company has now formally notified Mr. Sarbu that such unapproved transactions are outside the terms of the Co-operation Agreement as well as his employment agreement and has taken action to ensure that Mr. Sarbu and local management are aware of the consequences should such transactions be repeated.

Slovenia

There are no material agreements or relationships.

SlovakRepublic

STS, the services company of our investment in Slovak Republic, has a number of contracts with companies connected to Jan Kovacik, a local partner, for the provision of TV programs. Many of these contracts are for programs such as “Millionaire” that require specialist studios and specific broadcast rights. STS also sells advertising time through an advertising agency controlled by Jan Kovacik. The total 2002 sales were $2,145,000 (2001 : $2,386,000), and the total amount due to STS from this agency at December 31, 2002 was $1,819,000 (2001 : $1,720,000).

Ukraine

The Company contracts with Contact Film Studios for the production of certain TV programs. This is a company connected to the minority shareholder and joint Managing Director of Innova Film GmbH, Boris Fuchsmann.

Corporate

The Company from time to time enters into transactions with entities controlled wholly or in part by Ronald S. Lauder, the non-executive Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company’s management believes that these transactions are on a basis which approximates an arm’s-length value.

Consolidated Statements of Operations Items	Year Ended December 31, (US$ 000’s)

	2002	2001	2000


*Corporate Operating Costs and Development Expenses*
Shareholder controlled affiliates	-	-	246

Page 37

15. SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NON-CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

	Markiza TV						Studio 1+1

	At December 31,			At December 31,			At December 31,			At December 31,
	2002			2001			2002			2001

	(US$ 000's)			(US$ 000's)			(US$ 000's)			(US$ 000's)

Current assets	$	15,596		$	14,083		$	5,935		$	4,241
Non-current assets		13,254			10,768			1,033			1,290
Current liabilities		(10,734	)		(12,703	)		(8,218	)		(6,194	)
Non-current liabilities		(2,629	)		(802	)		-			-

Net Assets	$	15,487		$	11,346		$	(1,250	)	$	(663	)

	Markiza TV					Studio 1+1

	For the Years Ended					For the Years Ended

	December 31, 2002		December 31, 2001			December 31, 2002			December 31, 2001

	(US$ 000's)		(US$ 000's)			(US$ 000's)			(US$ 000's)

Net revenues	$	38,397	$	34,696		$	20,491		$	15,865
Operating (loss)/profit		3,842		3,735			(51	)		6,887
Net (loss)/profit		5,956		1,354			(587	)		5,305
Movement in Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)		2,879		(228	)		-			-

The Company's share of the result in Unconsolidated Affiliates (after inter-company eliminations) for 2002 was an income of $5,779,000 for Markiza TV and a loss of $587,000 for certain entities of the Studio 1+1 Group.

Page 38

16. CAPITAL LEASE COMMITMENTS

The Company leases certain of its office and manufacturing facilities as well as machinery and equipment under various leasing arrangements. The future minimum lease payments from continuing operations, by year and in the aggregate, under capital leases and under noncancelable operating leases with initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year, consisted of the following at December 31, 2002:

	At December
	31, 2002

	(US$ 000’s)

2003	$	137
2004		150
2005		110
2006		65
2007		72
2008 and thereafter		284

Total	$	818

17. SEGMENT DATA

The Company manages its business segments primarily on a geographic basis. The Company's reportable segments are comprised of Romania, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Ukraine and the Czech Republic.

The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on segment EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). Costs for programming amortization are included in segment EBITDA. Costs excluded from segment EBITDA primarily consist of interest and foreign exchange gains and losses, corporate expenses and goodwill amortization and equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates and other non-recurring charges for impairment of investments or discontinued operations. The assets and liabilities of the Company are managed centrally and are reported internally in the same manner as the consolidated financial statements, thus no additional information is provided.

"Broadcast cash flow", a broadcasting industry measure of performance, is defined as net revenues, less (i) station operating costs and expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization of acquired programming and of intangible assets), (ii) broadcast selling, general and administrative expenses, and (iii) cash program rights costs. Cash program rights costs are included in the period in which payment is made, which may not necessarily correspond to the timing of program use or amortization. Broadcast cash flow should not be considered as a substitute measure of operating performance or liquidity prepared in accordance with GAAP (see the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements).

Below is a table which reconciles the Company’s segment EBITDA and Broadcast cash flow to its consolidated US-GAAP results for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000:

Page 39

	Segment Financial InformationFor the Years Ended December 31, (US$ 000’s)

	Net Revenues									Segment EBITDA

	2002			2001			2000			2002			2001			2000

Station
Romania	$	33,547		$	32,553		$	39,591		$	6,347		$	(2,007	)	$	1,564
Slovak Republic (Markiza TV)		38,397			34,696			33,155			7,132			6,033			4,368
Slovenia (POP TV and Kanal A)		33,864			28,465			24,168			11,052			8,367			6,024
Ukraine (Studio 1+1 Group)		31,732			23,098			17,164			6,892			4,613			775

Total Combined Operations’ Net Revenues / Segment EBITDA	$	137,540		$	118,812		$	114,078		$	31,423		$	17,006		$	12,731


Reconciliation to Consolidated Statement of Operations:
Consolidated Net Revenues / Operating Income/(Loss)	$	92,602		$	73,238		$	76,813		$	13,409		$	(22,027	)	$	(33,484	)
Other Consolidated Entities:
Czech Republic (CNTS)		(308	)		(1,869	)		(3,257	)		900			(630	)		1,933
Write down of asset held for sale		-			-			-			3,446			-			-
Corporate Expenses		-			-			-			15,111			10,295			10,248
Net Arbitration (Proceeds)/Costs		-			-			-			(16,602	)		4,509			2,839
Unconsolidated Affiliates:
Ukraine (Studio 1+1 Group)		6,849			12,747			7,369			276			7,495			2,144
Slovak Republic (Markiza TV)		38,397			34,696			33,155			7,132			6,033			4,368
Other operations (Hungary)		-			-			(2	)		-			-			29
Station Depreciation		-			-			-			7,751			11,331			24,654

Total Combined Operations’ Net Revenues / Segment EBITDA	$	137,540		$	118,812		$	114,078		$	31,423		$	17,006		$	12,731

Cash paid for programming											(31,080	)		(22,460	)		(23,889	)
Programming Amortization											28,852			21,295			25,199

Broadcast Cash Flow										$	29,195		$	15,841		$	14,041

Broadcast Cash Flow by Segment:
Romania											4,607			(3,522	)		1,584
Slovak Republic (Markiza TV)											7,774			6,922			4,670
Slovenia (POP TV and Kanal A)											11,884			7,932			7,206
Ukraine (Studio 1+1 Group)											4,930			4,509			581

Broadcast Cash Flow										$	29,195		$	15,841		$	14,041

Page 40

18. NET ARBITRATION RELATED (PROCEEDS)/COSTS

On July 25, 2002 the Company received $8,713,002 from CET 21 as payment of the amounts owed by Dr. Zelezny pursuant to the final order of the ICC Arbitration Tribunal on February 9, 2001. On September 20, 2002, a further $20,240,000 was received from MEF Holding on behalf of Dr. Zelezny. The Company has treated the total receipt of $28,953,002 as a credit to the income statement as detailed in the table below. Arbitration Costs include all costs of and relating to the ICC Arbitration Tribunal against Dr Zelezny, and additionally, all costs relating to the arbitration proceedings against the Czech Republic (For further discussion see Part I, Item 3,"Legal Proceedings"). Arbitration Related Costs for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 were previously classified in Corporate operating costs and development expenses.

	For the Years Ended December 31, (US$ 000's)
		2002			2001		2000

Arbitration Related Proceeds	$	(28,953	)	$	-	$	-
Arbitration Related Costs		12,351			4,509		2,839

Net Arbitration Related (Proceeds)/Costs	$	(16,602	)	$	4,509	$	2,839

19. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On February 21, 2000, the Company sold substantially all of its operations in Hungary to SBS. This has resulted in these operations being treated as discontinued operations for all periods described in Results of Operations. The Company’s financial statements have been restated for all periods presented in order to reflect the operations in Hungary as discontinued operations.

20. FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

The Company generates revenues primarily in Czech korunas ("Kc"), Romanian lei ("ROL"), Slovak korunas ("Sk"), Slovenian tolar ("SIT") Ukrainian hryvna ("Hrn"), the Euro (“Euro”) and U.S. dollars (“US$”) and incurs expenses in those currencies as well as British pounds. The Romanian lei, Slovak koruna, Slovenian tolar and Ukrainian hryvna are managed currencies with limited convertibility. The Company incurs operating expenses for acquired programming in U.S. dollars and other foreign currencies. For financial statements where the functional currency is not the US Dollar, balance sheet accounts are translated from foreign currencies into US dollars at the relevant period end exchange rate; statement of operations accounts are translated from foreign currencies into United States dollars at the weighted average exchange rates for the respective periods. The resulting translation adjustments are reflected in a component of shareholders' equity with no effect on the con solidated statements of operations. Transactional gains and losses are recognised in the statement of operations.

Page 41

The exchange rates at the end of and for the periods indicated are shown in the table below.

	Balance Sheet As At December 31,							Income Statement Weighted Average for the years ended December 31,

	2002		2001		% change			2002		2001		% change

Euro equivalent of $1.00		0.95		1.12		15.2	%		1.06		1.12		5.4	%
Czech koruna equivalent of $1.00		30.14		36.27		16.9	%		32.74		38.04		13.9	%
Romanian lei equivalent of $1.00		33,500		31,597		(6.0	)%		33,043		29,032		(13.8	)%
Slovak koruna equivalent of $1.00		40.04		48.47		17.4	%		45.10		48.51		7.0	%
Slovenian tolar equivalent of $1.00		221.07		250.95		11.9	%		240.15		243.99		1.6	%
Ukrainian hryvna equivalent of $1.00		5.33		5.30		(0.6	)%		5.33		5.29		(0.8	)%

In the accompanying notes, $ equivalents of Euro, Kc, ROL, Sk, SIT and Hrn amounts have been included at December 31, 2002, 2001 or historical rates, as applicable, for illustrative purposes only. In limited instances, the Company enters into forward foreign exchange contracts and purchases foreign currency options to hedge foreign currency transactions for periods consistent with its identified exposures. Premiums on foreign currency options are amortized over the option period being hedged.

21. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company accounts for earnings per share pursuant to FAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” Basic net income per common share (“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per common share (“Diluted EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents then outstanding. FAS No. 128 requires the presentation of both Basic EPS and Diluted EPS on the face of the consolidated statement of operations. A reconciliation between the numerator and denominator of Basic EPS and Diluted EPS is as follows:

				For the Years Ended December 31,

	Net Income/(Loss) (US$ 000’s)			Common Shares (US$ 000’s)			Net Income/(Loss) per Common Share

	2002	2001	2000	2002	2001	2000	2002	2001	2000

Basic EPS
Net loss attributable to Common stock	$ (14,184)	$ (22,111)	$ (37,498)	13,224	13,224	13,220	$ (1.07)	$ (1.67)	$ (2.84)
Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Diluted EPS
Net loss attributable to Common stock and Assumed option exercises	$ (14,184)	$ (22,111)	$ (37,498)	13,224	13,224	13,220	$ (1.07)	$ (1.67)	$ (2.84)

Diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 do not include the impacts of the conversion of stock options or warrants then outstanding as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Consequently, 1,599,858, 1,037,458 and 979,998 potential common shares have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earning per share for 2002, 2001 an 2000, respectively.

Page 42

22. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

As at December 31, 2002, the Company had one derivative instrument. The Company held one dual currency deposit with a value of $600,000 which matured on January 13, 2003. This form of deposit is designed to enhance the yield on a given deposit. The Company contracts to a strike rate in an alternative currency at the time of maturity of the deposit. On the day of maturity, if the spot rate is less favorable than the contracted strike rate, the Company will receive its money in the alternative currency. Alternatively, should there be a favorable exchange rate fluctuation between the contract date and the maturity date, the Company would not be in a position to take advantage of this. This form of derivative instrument does not qualify for hedge accounting.

23. SUBSIDIARIES AND INVESTMENTS

The Company’s subsidiaries and investments as at March 10, 2003 are summarized in the table below.

Company Name	CME Voting Interest	Jurisdiction of Organization	Subsidiary / Equity Accounted Affiliate/Investment (1)

Media Pro International S.A.	66%	Romania	Subsidiary
Media Vision S.R.L.	70%	Romania	Subsidiary
MPI Romania B.V	66%	Netherlands	Subsidiary
Media Pro S.R.L	44%	Romania	Equity Accounted Affiliate
Pro TV S.R.L.	49%	Romania	Equity Accounted Affiliate
Media Pro Chisinau S.R.L	39%	Moldovia	Equity Accounted Affiliate

International Media Services Ltd.	60%	Bermuda	Subsidiary
Innova Film GmbH	60%	Germany	Subsidiary
Enterprise "Inter-Media"	60%	Ukraine	Subsidiary
Broadcasting Company "Studio 1+1"	18%	Ukraine	Equity Accounted Affiliate
Gravis	30%	Ukraine	Equity Accounted Affiliate

Ceska Nezavisla Televizni Spolecnost, spol. s.r.o.	93.2%	Czech Republic	Subsidiary
CET 21 spol. S.r.o.	3.125%	Czech Republic	Investment

Slovenska Televizna Spolocnost, spol. s.r.o.	49%	Slovak Republic	Equity Accounted Affiliate
Markiza s.ro. Slovak Republic	8.5%	Slovak Republic	Equity Accounted Affiliate
Gamatex s.r.o.	49%	Slovak Republic	Equity Accounted Affiliate
ADAM (Slovak Republic)	49%	Slovak Republic	Equity Accounted Affiliate

MKTV Rt (Irisz TV)	100%	Hungary	Subsidiary
GammaSat Media Investment Holding Kft	100%	Hungary	Subsidiary


Page 43




MM TV 1, d.o.o.	100%	Slovenia	Subsidiary
Produkcija Plus, d.o.o.	96.85%	Slovenia	Subsidiary
POP TV d.o.o.	96.85%	Slovenia	Subsidiary
Kanal A d.d.	96.85%	Slovenia	Subsidiary
Superplus Holding d.d.	96.85%	Slovenia	Subsidiary
Tele 59, d.o.o.	10%	Slovenia	Equity Accounted Affiliate
MTC Holding, d.o.o.	24%	Slovenia	Equity Accounted Affiliate

CME Media Enterprises B.V.	100%	Netherlands	Subsidiary
CME Czech Republic B.V.	100%	Netherlands	Subsidiary
CME Czech Republic II B.V.	100%	Netherlands	Subsidiary
CME Germany B.V.	100%	Netherlands	Subsidiary
CME Hungary B.V.	100%	Netherlands	Subsidiary
CME Poland B.V.	100%	Netherlands	Subsidiary
CME Romania B.V.	100%	Netherlands	Subsidiary
CME Slovak Republic B.V.	100%	Netherlands	Subsidiary
CME Slovenia B.V.	100%	Netherlands	Subsidiary
CME Ukraine B.V.	100%	Netherlands	Subsidiary

CME Media Enterprises Ltd	100%	UK	Subsidiary
CME Ukraine Holding GmbH	100%	Austria	Subsidiary
CME Germany GmbH	100%	Germany	Subsidiary
CME Development Corporation	100%	USA	Subsidiary
CME Programming Services B.V.	100%	Netherlands	Subsidiary
Central European Media Enterprises N.V.	100%	Netherlands Antilles	Subsidiary

(1) All subsidiaries have been consolidated in the Company’s Financial Statements. All equity accounted Affiliates have been accounted for using the equity method.

Page 44

24. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Two-For–One Stock Split

On December 16, 2002 a duly authorized committee of the Board approved a two-for-one stock split by way of the issue of one pari-passu bonus share in respect of each share of Class A or Class B Common Stock. This applied to stockholders as at the record date of December 30, 2002. Payment has been made in full by way of a transfer from the share premium account on January 10, 2003.

The two-for-one stock split: (i) had no effect on the par value of the company’s Class A and Class B Common Stock; (ii) increased the value of the authorized share capital of the Company’s Class A Common Stock from $370,276 to $740,552; and (iii) increased the value of the authorized share capital of the Company’s Class B Common Stock from $158,694 to $317,388.

Page 45

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Shareholders of Slovenská televízna spolocnost, s.r.o.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Slovenská televízna spolocnost, s.r.o. and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. The consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000 were audited by another auditor whose reports dated February 28, 2002 and 2001, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. The auditor expressed an uncertainty with respect to the adequacy of the valuation of the deferred tax asset held by the Company.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statements’ presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Slovenská televízna spolocnost, s.r.o. and its subsidiary as of 31 December 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Deloitte & Touche, spol. s r.o.

Bratislava, Slovak Republic

February 10, 2003

Page 46

This is a copy and does not reflect a reissuance of Arthur Andersen's Audit Report

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Partners of Slovenská televízna spolocnost, s.r.o.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Slovenská televízna spolocnost, s.r.o. and its subsidiary as of 31 December 31 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and partners' equity for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Slovenská televízna spolocnost, s.r.o. and its subsidiary at December 31, 2001, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

As disclosed in Note 21 to the financial statements, the Company has decided to create a valuation adjustment for the whole amount of the deferred tax asset of USD 2,464 thousand. Due to the long-term nature of the substantial part of this asset, there is uncertainty as to the amount at which this asset will be realized and, therefore, we cannot asses the adequacy of the valuation adjustment created by the Company.

Without further qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to the fact that, as disclosed in note 2 to the financial statements, the General Assembly of the Company has not formally approved, as of the date of this report, the financial statements for the year 2000, 1999 and 1998, prepared in accordance with Slovak law, from which accompanying financial statements have been derived.

Arthur Andersen
Slovensko spol. s.r.o.

Bratislava, Slovak Republic
28 February 2002

Page 47

This is a copy and does not reflect a reissuance of Arthur Andersen's Audit Report

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Slovenská televízna spolocnost, s.r.o.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Slovenská televízna spolocnost, s.r.o. and its subsidiary as of 31 December 31 2000 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and shareholders' deficit for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Slovenská televízna spolocnost, s.r.o. and its subsidiary at December 31, 2000, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to the fact that the accompanying balance sheet as of 31 December 2000 includes a deferred tax asset amounting to USD 723 thousand. The value of this asset is based on the best estimate of the company's management, however, the recoverability of the asset is still uncertain as it depends upon the improved future profitability of the Company.

Arthur Andersen
Slovensko spol. s.r.o.

Bratislava, Slovak Republic
28 February 2001

Page 48

SLOVENSKA TELEVIZNA SPOLOCNOST S.R.O.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2002 and 2001 (US$ 000’s)


		December 31, 2002			December 31, 2001
ASSETS
Current Assets
	Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,887		$	1,437
	Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $1,867, $1,792)		10,105			10,809
	Program rights costs		1,121			978
	Advances to affiliates		101			129
	Income taxes receivable.		230			0
	Other short-term assets		743			730
	Deferred tax asset		409			-

Total current assets			15,596			14,083

Property, plant and equipment (net of depreciation of $17,562, $13,167			9,805			8,882
	Program rights costs		1,682			1,467
	License costs and other intangibles (net of amortization of $1,159, $910)		101			419
	Deferred Tax Assets		1,666			-
Total Assets		$	28,850		$	24,851

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		$	7,893		$	6,664
Duties and other taxes payable			290			799
Current portion of credit facilities and obligations under capital leases			815			1,370
Advances from affiliates			1,715			3,852
Other current liabilities			21			18

Total Current Liabilities		$	10,734		$	12,703

Long term portion of credit facilities and obligations under capital leases			2,629			802

Total Non Current Liabilities			2,629			802
Commitments and contingencies (note 14)
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock			6			6
Additional paid in capital			39,326			39,326
Shareholders’ Loan			(4,694	)		-
Accumulated deficit			(12,080	)		(18,036	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(7,071	)		(9,950	)

Total shareholders’ equity			15,487			11,346

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	28,850		$	24,851

Page 49

SLOVENSKA TELEVIZNA SPOLOCNOST, S.R.O.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the years endedDecember 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

(US$ 000’s)

		For the Years Ended December 31,
		2002		2001			2000
Net revenues		$	38,397	$	34,696		$	33,156
EXPENSES:
	Operating costs and expenses		18,854		16,131			15,882
	Amortization of programming rights		8,429		7,960			8,847
	Depreciation of station fixed assets and other intangibles		1,680		1,549			3,206
	Selling, general and administrative expenses		5,592		5,321			4,809
Goodwill impairment			-		-			1,706
Operating income/(loss)			3,842		3,735			(1,294	)
Other Income/Expense:
Net interest and other expense			770		(702	)		(1,409	)
Income/(loss) before provision for income taxes			4,612		3,033			(2,703	)
Provision for income taxes			1,344		(1,679	)		(480	)

Net income/(loss)		$	5,956	$	1,354		$	(3,183	)

Page 50

SLOVENSKA TELEVIZNA SPOLOCNOST, S.R.O.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

(US$ 000’s)

	Accumulated Deficit	Common Stock	Shareholders’ Loan	Additional Paid in capital	Accumulated Deficit	Accumulated other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)	Total shareholders’ equity

BALANCE,December 31, 1999	-	6	-	39,326	(16,207)	(8,147)	14,978
Comprehensive income/(loss):
Net loss for 2000	(3,183)	-	-	-	(3,183)	-	(3,183)
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
Currency translation adjustment	(1,575)	-	-	-	-	(1,575)	(1,575)

Comprehensive (loss)	(4,758)


BALANCE,December 31, 2000		6	-	39,326	(19,390)	(9,722)	10,220
Comprehensive income:
Net income for 2001	1,354	-	-	-	1,354	-	1,354
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
Currency translation adjustment	(228)	-	-	-	-	(228)	(228)

Comprehensive income	1,126


BALANCE,December 31, 2001		6	-	39,326	(18,036)	(9,950)	11,346

Shareholders’ Loan		-	(4,694)	-	-	-	(4,694)
Comprehensive income
Net income for 2002	5,956	-	-	-	5,956	-	5,956
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
Currency translation adjustment	2,879	-	-	-	-	2,879	2,879
Comprehensive income	8,835


BALANCE,December 31, 2002		6	(4,694)	39,326	(12,080)	(7,071)	15,487

Page 51

SLOVENSKA TELEVIZNA SPOLOCNOST, S.R.O.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW STATEMENTS

For the years endedDecember 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

(US$ 000’s)

			2002			2001			2000
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income/(loss)			$	5,956		$	1,354		$	(3,183	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
	Depreciation and amortization			10,190			9,579			12,166
	Goodwill impairment			-			-			1,706
	Provision for doubtful accounts receivable			(206	)		746			445
	Exchange rate losses/(gains)			-			17			85
	(Gain)/Loss from sales of fixed assets			(2	)		(9	)		(5	)
	Net change in deferred income taxes			(2,075	)		707			251
	Net change in:
		Accounts receivable		2,902			(2,426	)		(1,747	)
		Investments in Program rights		(9,152	)		(7,164	)		(8,388	)
		Other Assets		124			(65	)		241
		Accounts payable		(1,910	)		(1,676	)		(205	)
		Other current liabilities		41			19			9
		Income taxes payable		(846	)		803			634

Net cash provided by operating activities				5,022			1,885			2,009

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Purchase of ADAM a.s			-			-			(1,706	)
	Acquisition of tangible assets			(567	)		(1,185	)		(719	)
	Net purchase of intangible assets			-			(254	)		(107	)
	Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets			10			24			29
	Repayment grants			-			-			428

Net cash used in investing activities				(557	)		(1,415	)		(2,075	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Cash used in short term credit facilities			(749	)		(273	)		(294	)
	Cash provided by long term credit facilities			1,472			-			-
	Distribution to shareholders			(4,168	)		-			-

Net cash used in financing activities				(3,445	)		(273	)		(294	)

Effect of exchange rate differences on cash and cash equivalents..…				430			(29	)		(192	)

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents				1,450			168			(552	)
CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period				1,437			1,269			1,821
CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period			$	2,887		$	1,437		$	1,269


SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for interest				356			288			281
Cash paid for income taxes (net of refunds)				1,504			207			(405	)
Non cash financing activities				-			225			517

Page 52

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000

(Amounts in tables in thousands of US $)

(1) NATURE OF BUSINESS

Slovenská televízna spolocnost, s.r.o. (STS) is a Slovak limited liability company, having its legal seat in Blatné 18, 900 82 Blatné, Slovak Republic. It was founded on September 28, 1995 and incorporated into the Commercial Register on October 9, 1995. The main activities of STS stated in the Commercial Register, are the following:

Providing AUDIOTEX telecommunication service.

Advertising and mediation services.

Retailing and wholesaling under free trade license.

Publishing, binding and other activities associated with the completion of books.

Designing and publishing posters, publishing newspapers.

Publishing magazines and other periodical publications.

Publishing carriers with audio records.

Copying carriers with audio-video records.

Copying carriers with audio records and video records.

Producing, lending and distributing video records.

Organizing advertising games for sales promotion purposes.

Using the results of creative activities with the author’s agreement.

Textile manufacturing.

Real estate agency services.

Market research and public opinion poll.

Press agency activities.

Technical supporting and organizing exhibitions.

STS focuses on:

Broadcasting of programming (own production and acquired).

Sale of advertising to final customers.

Programs produced by STS are broadcast by MARKÍZA - SLOVAKIA, s.r.o. (“MARKÍZA - SLOVAKIA”), in accordance with the license granted to MARKÍZA - SLOVAKIA by The Council of the Slovak Republic for Broadcasting and Television Transmission. The license provides for broadcasting within the territory of the Slovak Republic utilizing terrestrial signals, achieving approximately 80% national coverage. The license is limited for a period of 12 years commencing August 7, 1995.

On October 3, 2001 there was a change in invoicing between STS and MARKÍZA – SLOVAKIA. Based on the contract on ceding exclusive rights concluded between the two parties, MARKÍZA – SLOVAKIA transferred its broadcasting rights to STS. As a result, STS collects all revenues from broadcasting. MARKÍZA – SLOVAKIA has a 51% ownership interest and a 30% economic interest in STS. STS pays MARKÍZA – SLOVAKIA a fixed annual fee of US $50 thousand.

Page 53

For transfer of broadcasting rights, STS is obliged to pay MARKIZA - SLOVAKIA the following:

the amount equal to all costs and expenses incurred in STS in connection with supply of programming service for MARKIZA – SLOVAKIA;

the amount equal to all fees and other payments payable to Slovenské telekomunikácie by MARKIZA - SLOVAKIA for the transmission services;

the aggregate amount of salaries and other employment benefits payable to MARKIZA - SLOVAKIA’ employees exercising MARKIZA - SLOVAKIA’ editorial responsibility;

the amount of all penalties imposed on MARKIZA - SLOVAKIA by the Council with respect to the broadcasting of the programming service by MARKIZA - SLOVAKIA;

all damages payable to third parties arising out of the broadcasting;

all amounts payable by MARKIZA - SLOVAKIA to organizations of collective administration of copyrights and other similar rights;

a margin of US $ 50 thousand annually;

a margin of US $ 12 thousand monthly (equals to margin monthly invoiced by STS to MARKIZA - SLOVAKIA).

STS invoices monthly amounts according to letters a) to f) and 1/12 of amount under letter g); plus relating VAT.

For provision of the programmers and the whole programming service, MARKIZA - SLOVAKIA is obliged to pay STS the following:

the amount equal to all costs and expenses incurred by STS in connection with supply of programming service for MARKIZA - SLOVAKIA;

a margin of US $ 12 thousand per month.

Each month the aggregate amounts invoiced by STS to MARKIZA - SLOVAKIA (receivables) and by MARKIZA - SLOVAKIA to STS (payables) are set-off.

In the accompanying consolidated statement of operation for the year ended December 31, 2002, the statutory revenues and expenses of STS resulting from the above scheme have been netted in selling, general and administrative expenses by US $ 35,379 thousand.

(2) BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Slovenská televízna spolocnost, s.r.o. (STS) and its wholly-owned subsidiary ADAM, a.s. (collectively, STS). All intercompany accounts and transactions between the consolidated entities have been eliminated.

Gamatex has no activities and the intention of the management of STS is to liquidate it in the near future.

Page 54

The Company maintains its accounting records in Slovak crowns and in accordance with Slovak law.

The accompanying financial statements are based on the statutory books of account of the Company with certain adjustments for the purpose of fair presentation in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP).

There were no changes in the main accounting policies, methods of valuation, depreciation and classification applied in the preparation of these financial statements, compared to the previous accounting period.

(3) ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES

a)	*Basis of accounting*

The company maintains its books of accounts and prepares statements for regulatory purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the Slovak Republic. The accompanying financial statements are based on the accounting records of the company and include adjustments and reclassifications, where appropriate, for fair presentation in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”).

The company maintains its books in Slovak crowns (SKK). The accompanying financial statements were translated to US dollars (US $) at the exchange rates ruling at the year-end, except for equity balances, which were translated to US $ at historical exchange rates, and balances in the statement of operations, to which the weighted average exchange rates for the year were applied. The resulting unrealized gain or loss on translation into the reporting currency is included as a separate component of shareholders' equity under Accumulated other comprehensive income /(loss).

b)	*Cash and cash equivalents*

Cash and cash equivalents include unrestricted cash in banks and highly liquid investments with original maturities of less than three months at the date of purchase.

c)	*Program rights and production costs*

Program rights acquired by the company under license agreements and the liabilities arising from these agreements are recorded as assets and liabilities when the license period begins. Assets are amortized using the accelerated method based on the estimated period of usage.Amortization estimates for program rights are reviewed periodically and adjusted, if necessary. Program rights costs are shown net of amortization.

Film licenses are amortized for 90% after the first run and 10% after the second run. Series are amortized for 100% after the first run of the whole series.

Wall of programming reserve-

The acquisition of new licenses is based on specific requirements of free broadcasting time slots (“windows”). The license is purchased for a specific free window in the programming structure. STS does not purchase licenses for stock. If STS is “forced” by the supplier of licenses to purchase a package of licenses, STS tries to manage the structure and starting date of licenses.

The wall of programming reserve is calculated from the database of active licenses (NBV of licenses).

Page 55

Each license of film or series has its particular popularity and quality, which influence the scheduling into the programming structure. According to the position in the programming structure and particular broadcasting window, the license is assigned with a special category. (PA, PB, LA, LB etc. see Categories sheet). The classification in categories is primary important for the calculation of wall of programming reserve. The reserve is calculated from first and second run licenses. The first run licenses classified as "ODPIS" are fully provided. From the second run all the licenses, except the category prime time "PA, PB", are provided too.

Category	Description	Example
PA	Prime Time	Blockbusters
PB	Prime Time	Other prime time
LA	Late Fringe	Sat- Sun 22:00 programs
A	Access	Anything between 17:30 and the News
LB	Late Fringe	Weekdays 22:00 first run series, movies, "B" weekend 22:00 movies
DA	Day-part	Great classic movies (Sat-Sun afternoon)
DB	Day-part	Day-part movies/ series, morning, early afternoon late night
DC	Day-part	Trash, junk
TBA	To be available	Licenses already purchased, but specific condition are not defined yet (package licenses), like: title, price or license period;
NC	Not coded	The licenses can not be classified, insufficient information about the license;
ODPIS	Waste	Licenses fully provided for

All the second run licenses besides PA, PB are provided due to low watch rate of second runs. The provision of those licenses is made up to the 10% of the total value of the license, because 90% were already depreciated after the first run.

Production costs for in-house programs are capitalized and expensed when first broadcast except where they have a potential to generate future revenues. When this is the case, production costs are capitalized and amortized on the same basis as programs obtained from third parties. The amounts of production costs capitalized as at balance sheet dates are insignificant.

d)	*Property, plant and equipment*

Fixed assets are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using both straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the related assets:


	Description	Years

	Buildings and other constructions	25
	Movable items	4 – 8

Maintenance and repairs, which do not improve or extend the useful lives of the respective assets, are expensed as incurred. Disposals are removed from both cost and accumulated depreciation accounts.

e)	*Assets held under capital leases*

Assets held under capital leases are accounted for in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, Accounting for Leases, and recorded in Property, plant and equipment. The related liability is included in Debt - obligations under capital lease.

Page 56

f)	*Intangible assets*

Intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets:


	Description	Years

	Software licenses	4
	Patents, rights, jingles and royalties	4
	Low-value and other intangibles	1

The company periodically evaluates in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) 142, whether events and circumstances have occurred which may affect the estimated useful life or the recoverability of the remaining balance of its long-lived assets. If such events or circumstances were to indicate that the carrying amount of these assets would not be recoverable, the company would recognize an impairment loss.

g)	*Foreign currency transactions*

The company’s functional currency is the Slovak crown, the reporting currency is the United States dollar.

Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are recorded at the exchange rate in effect at the date of the transaction. Outstanding foreign currency obligations and receivables have been translated at the exchange rate in effect as of the balance sheet date. Transaction gains or losses have been charged to the statement of operations.

h)	*Income taxes*

The company accounts for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes are recorded for all differences between the tax bases of assets or liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets are recorded to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not.

i)	*Revenue recognition*

Advertising revenues-

Revenues primarily result from the sale of advertising time and are recognized at the time when the advertisements are broadcast. The Company’s policy is that discounts and agency commission is recognized in the period in which the advertising is aired and is reflected as a reduction in net revenue.

Barter transactions

Barter revenues of US $ 1,416 thousand and expenses of US $ 1,337 thousand were recognized during the year 2002. Barter revenues of US $ 2,007 thousand and expenses of US $ 2,007 thousand were recognized during the year 2001. Barter revenues of US $ 2,255 thousand and expenses of US $ 2,255 thousand were recognized during the year 2000.

Page 57

j)	*Accounting for derivative instruments*

In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The statement establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. The Statement requires that changes in the derivative’s fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Special accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivative’s gains and losses to offset related results on the hedged item in the income statement, and requires that a company must formally document, designate, and assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting.

The company has adopted SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS No. 138, for fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2001. The impact of the adoption was not material.

k)	*Use of estimates*

The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States which require the management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies. While the management has based their assumptions and estimates on the facts and circumstances known at December 31, 2002, actual amounts may differ from estimates. The key estimates include allowance for doubtful accounts, useful lives assigned to property, plant and equipment, program rights and the valuation allowance on deferred taxes.

(4) CASH AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES

Cash and cash equivalents-

The Company had cash of $2,887 at December 31, 2002 to enable it to finance its future activities compared to $1,437 as at December 31, 2001.

Page 58

(5) PROGRAM RIGHTS


	Balance at 31.12.2001			Additions			Write off of excessive programming		Exchange rate impact			Balance at 31.12.2002

Cost
Programming licenses and dubbing		41,363			9,314			-		8,711			59,388
Bartered programs		1,724			-			-		363			2,087
Total cost		43,087			9,314			-		9,074			61,475
Accumulated amortization
Program licenses and dubbing		(37,883	)		(9,807	)		-		(7,978	)		(55,668	)
Bartered programs		(1,724	)		-					(363	)		(2,087	)
Program waste reserve		(1,035	)		-			336		(218	)		(917	)
Total accumulated amortization		(40,642	)		(9,807	)		336		(8,559	)		(58,672	)

Net book value		2,445											2,803

The database of licenses where the licence period has commenced as of December 31, 2002 has been classified as either current (US $ 1,121 thousand) or non-current (US $ 1,682 thousand) portion. The current portion represents licences under which the rights are expected to expire within one year ending December 31, 2003.

The amortization of licences and the release of program waste reserve are included in the program syndication caption of the statement of operations.

(6) OTHER SHORT TERM ASSETS

The breakdown of other short term assets relate mainly to:


	Balance at 31.12.2002		Balance at 31.12.2001


VAT Receivable		203		276

Prepaid expenses and advances
Production & operation		316		241
Licences and dubbing		112		127
Employee advances		12		13

Other current assets
Receivable from Sipox		-		42
Game show winning prizes		37		-
Receivable Markiza-Slovakia		37		-
Receivable Teltex		6		-
Other		20		31

Total		743		730

Page 59

(7) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

The components of Property, plant and equipment during the year ended December 31, 2002 are as follows:


	Balance at 31.12.2001	Additions	Reclasses	Write off	Exchange rate impact	Balance at 31.12.2002

Cost
Land	642	-	-	-	135	777
Buildings	6,844	-	6	-	1,442	8,292
Vehicles under capital lease	849	-	-	(25)	179	1,003
Machinery and equipment	9,976	-	418	-	2,100	12,494
Other equipment	2,009	-	426	(141)	423	2,717
Vehicles	1,631	-	57	(47)	343	1,984
Construction in progress	98	888	(907)	-	20	99
Total acquisition cost	22,049	888	-	(213)	4,642	27,366
Accumulated depreciation
Buildings	(1,076)	(332)	-	-	(226)	(1,634)
Vehicles under capital lease	(415)	(309)	-	25	(88)	(787)
Machinery and equipment	(8,984)	(637)	-	-	(1,892)	(11,513)
Other equipment	(1,725)	(258)	-	141	(363)	(2,205)
Vehicles	(967)	(300)	-	47	(202)	(1,422)
Total accumulated depreciation	(13,167)	(1,836)	-	213	(2,771)	(17,561)

Net book value	8,882					9,805

The components of Property, plant and equipment during the year ended December 31, 2001 are as follows:


	Balance at 31.12.2000	Additions	Reclasses	Write off	Exchange rate impact	Balance at 31.12.2001

Cost
Land	657	-	-	-	(15)	642
Buildings	5,368	-	1,595	-	(119)	6,844
Vehicles under capital lease	854	-	226	(212)	(19)	849
Machinery and equipment	9,581	-	618	(10)	(213)	9,976
Other equipment	1,946	-	231	(125)	(43)	2,009
Vehicles	1,637	-	64	(33)	(37)	1,631
Construction in progress	94	2,740	(2,734)	-	(2)	98
Total acquisition cost	20,137	2,740	-	(380)	(448)	22,049
Accumulated depreciation
Buildings	(855)	(240)	-	-	19	(1,076)
Vehicles under capital lease	(387)	(248)	-	212	8	(415)
Machinery and equipment	(8,685)	(502)	-	10	193	(8,984)
Other equipment	(1,661)	(226)	-	125	37	(1,725)
Vehicles	(784)	(233)	-	33	17	(967)
Total accumulated depreciation	(12,372)	(1,449)	-	380	274	(13,167)

Net book value	7,765					8,882

Page 60

(8) LEASED ASSETS

Commitments under capital leases

The obligations under the capital lease are summarized below:


Leasing	Amount

Payments due in 2003		156
Payments due in 2004		78
Payments due in 2005		113
Total		347
Less: Amounts representing interest		(102	)

Total		245

Assets held under capital leases represent vehicles.

Commitments under operating leases

The company is obligated under operating leases expiring in 2004. Payments for leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable terms in excess of one year are summarized below:


Due	Amount

2003		556
2004		42
2005		-

Total		598

The total rent expense related to these leases was US $ 660 thousand in 2002 and US $ 92 thousand in 2001.

(9) ACQUISITIONS

On June 30, 2000, STS acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of ADAM, a.s. (ADAM) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Gamatex, s.r.o (Gamatex). The purchase price was approximately US $ 1,688 thousand in cash. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, and accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been recorded at their fair value as of the date of acquisition. The excess of purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed was recorded as goodwill.

In respect of this transaction the company recognized as an impairment loss of US $ 1,706 thousand in the statement of operations for the year ending December 31, 2000.

Page 61

(10) INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The components of Intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2002 are as follows:


	Balance at 31.12.2001			Additions			Reclassifications			Exchange rate impact			Balance at 31.12.2002

Cost
Software		746			-			4			157			907
Rights		29			-			17			6			52
Jingles		224			-			-			47			271
Other		88			-			23			18			129
Intangibles not put in use		242			(249	)		(44	)		51			0
Total acquisition cost		1,329			(249	)		-			279			1,359
Total accumulated amortization		(910	)		(157	)		-			(191	)		(1,258	)

Total		419												101

The components of Intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2001 are as follows:


	Balance at 31.12.2000			Additions			Reclassifications			Exchange rate impact			Balance at 31.12.2001

Cost
Software		719			-			43			(16	)		746
Rights		30			-			-			(1	)		29
Jingles		229			-			-			(5	)		224
Other		73			-			17			(2	)		88
Construction in progress		49			254			(60	)		(1	)		242
Total acquisition cost		1,100			254			-			(25	)		1,329
Total accumulated amortization		(741	)		(185	)		-			16			(910	)

Total		359												419

(11) ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

The breakdown of accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 is as follows:


	Balance at 31.12.2002		Balance at 31.12.2001

Program rights payable
Distributors		587		1,418
Dubbing/Subtitling		159		417
Non invoiced programs		1,741		1,022
Accounts payable
Equipment		199		371
Production		1,114		1,192
Operation		1,104		683

Accrued liabilities

Production		998		136

Payroll bonuses		815		334

Operation		449		301

Other		727		790

Total		7,893		6,664

Page 62

(12) DEBT

The components of debt are :


	Balance at 31.12.2002		Balance at 31.12.2001

Obligation under capital lease - current		103		271
Credit facilities - current		712		322
Short-term related party loans		-		777
Current portion of debt		815		1,370
Obligation under capital lease - non-current		142		220
Credit facilities - non-current		2,486		582
Long-term related party loans		-		-
Long-term debt		2,629		802

Total		3,444		2,172

On 24 July 2002 the Company obtained from Vseobecna uverova banka, a.s. a mid-term facility of SKK 100,000 thousand (US $ 2,498 thousand). This facility matures in December 2005 and bears an interest rate of BRIBOR 3 months+1.7%.

On 24 July 2002 the Company obtained from Vseobecna uverova banka, a.s. an overdraft facility of SKK 50,000 thousand (US $ 1,249 thousand). This facility matures in July 2003 and bears an interest rate of BRIBOR 3 months +1.7%. The Company has not utilized the overdraft facility as of December 31, 2002.

Credit facilities further comprises of a supplier loan granted to STS by ZT Slovakia Trading, a.s. in relation to the purchase of the building Fajn Club in 2001. The loan denominated in Slovak Crowns is repayable in 36 monthly installments and bears an interest rate at 13% p.a. Its non-current portion is due as follows:

At December 31, 2002, maturities of debt are as follows:


	VUB credit facilities		ZT Slovakia Trading facilities		Total

2004		250		238		488
2005		1,998		-		1,998

Total		2,248		238		2,486

Guarantees, liens and pledges-

There are no guarantees issued to a third party. The Company has pledge on fixed and current assets based on the loan contract signed with Vseobecna uverova banka, a.s. on 24 July 2002. The nominal value of receivables under pledge according to the contract is US $ 2,498.

According to the loan contract the Company has to comply with specific quantitative and qualitative covenant conditions. Quantitative covenants are: the current ratio higher than 0.7, gearing ratio lower then 65%, interest cover higher than 2 and EBIT can not be lower than 20% compared to the budgeted EBIT. As of December 31, 2002, STS was in compliance with the above mentioned covenants.

Page 63

(13) EQUITY

The structure of the STS shareholders is as follows:


	Ownership in %

MARKIZA-SLOVAKIA, s.r.o.	51
CME	49

	100

(14) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Station program rights-

The company has program rights commitments for US $ 4,104 thousand in respect of future programming. This includes all contracts signed in 2001 and 2002 with the licence periods starting after December 31, 2002. The company has also entered into certain barter agreements continuing through 2002 and beyond, by which advertising is provided in exchange for programs. As the value of this advertising time will be determined at the time of broadcasting, it is not possible to quantify the impact of these agreements.

Legal claims-

STS in the normal course of its business is involved in litigation. Whereas it is difficult to predict the outcome of such litigation, it has however made a provision in the amount of US $ 125 thousand, for cases where the executives of STS understand the lawsuit may have negative consequences for STS. The executives of STS believe that the risks are adequately covered by this accrual.

(15) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Related party balances as of December 31, 2002 are as follows:


	Receivables		Advances granted		Accruals		Loans granted		Payables

Credit Partner⁽³⁾		1,819		-		-		-		-
Tv Tip⁽²⁾		63		-		-		-		26
Forza, a.s.⁽³⁾		3		-		-		-		139
www.markiza.sk⁽²⁾		1		-		-		-		31
Forza music, s.r.o.⁽³⁾		-		-		-		-		3
Axis Media⁽³⁾		1		-		-		-		3
Fajn Production⁽²⁾		2		1		-		-		56
ARJ⁽³⁾		6		-		-		-
Studio L+S⁽²⁾		-		-		-		-		2
Falcon Safety⁽²⁾		-		-		-		-		21
Vyhra⁽²⁾		11		-		-		-		2
Media Invest⁽¹⁾		-		-		-		2,088		-
CME⁽¹⁾		-		-		-		2,606		489
MARKIZA-SLOVAKIA, s.r.o.⁽¹⁾		-		100		37		-		693
CNTS⁽³⁾		-		-		-		-		104

Total		1,906		101		37		4,694		1,569

⁽¹⁾ Shareholder

⁽²⁾ Other related party

⁽³⁾ Related party due to common ultimate shareholder

Page 64

All related party transactions during the year ended December 31, 2002 comprised of:


	Revenues		Expenses

Credit Partner⁽³⁾		2,123		-
Tv Tip⁽²⁾		27		27
Media Invest⁽¹⁾		267		-
Forza, a.s.⁽³⁾		82		358
www.markiza.sk⁽²⁾		52		144
Forza music, s.r.o.		-		15
Axis Media⁽³⁾		22		25
Slovenská Strategická⁽²⁾		-		16
Fajn Production⁽²⁾		13		212
Media Mix		12		23
Studio L+S⁽²⁾		-		10
Falcon Safety⁽²⁾		-		90
Výhra⁽²⁾		47		39
CME⁽¹⁾		96		1,610
MARKIZA-SLOVAKIA, s.r.o.⁽¹⁾		-		35

Total		2,757		2,588

⁽¹⁾ Shareholder

⁽²⁾ Other related party

⁽³⁾ Related party due to common ultimate shareholder

In the table above, the revenues and expenses with MARKIZA – SLOVAKIA are presented net of US $ 35,379 thousand resulting from mutual invoicing .

Out of all related party transactions during the year ended December 31, 2002, presented in the table above, the financial transactions comprised of:


	Revenues	Expenses

Media Invest⁽¹⁾	80	-
CME⁽⁺⁾	96	-

Total	176	-

⁽¹⁾ Shareholder

TV Tip revenues represent revenues from advertising activities. TV Tip expenses represent advertising expenses in a magazine.

Www.markiza.sk revenues represent revenues from advertising activities and expenses represent advertising expenses and administration of the company’s web site.

CME expenses represent charges for network access fee and management fees. In 2002, network access fee amounted to US $ 960 thousand and management fees amounted to US $ 650 thousand.

MARKIZA-SLOVAKIA, s.r.o. expenses represent re-invoicing of monthly expenses incurred such as broadcasting fees, penalties, author royalties, etc.

Fajn Production transactions represent revenues from advertising activities and expenses represent rental of premises and technology.

Forza, a.s. transactions represent revenues from advertising activities and production expenses.

Výhra transactions represent revenues and expenses for advertising activities.

Axis Media transactions represent revenues from advertising activities and expenses incurred for rental of vehicles.

Credit Partner and ARJ transactions represent revenues from advertising activities.

Studio L+S and Slovenská Strategická transactions represent production expenses.

Page 65

FORZA music s.r.o. transactions represent advertising and marketing activities.

Falcon Safety transactions represent expenses related to cleaning services.

Media Invest revenues represent revenues from advertising activities.

Media Mix transactions represent revenues from advertising activities and expenses for advertising in newspapers

All related party transactions during the year ended December 31, 2001 comprised of:


	Revenues		Expenses

Credit Partner⁽³⁾		1,940		-
Tv Tip⁽²⁾		211		25
Mirox⁽²⁾		80		42
Forza, a.s.⁽³⁾		203		228
www.markíza.sk⁽²⁾		60		180
Axis Media⁽³⁾		21		25
Slovenská Strategická⁽²⁾		-		21
Fajn Production⁽²⁾		9		410
ARJ⁽³⁾		4		-
FORZA CZ, s.r.o.⁽³⁾		-		69
Studio L+S⁽²⁾		-		9
Falcon Safety⁽²⁾		-		72
Výhra⁽²⁾		2		11
CME⁽¹⁾		-		750
MARKÍZA-SLOVAKIA, s.r.o.⁽¹⁾		-		858

Total		2,530		2,700

⁽¹⁾ Partner

⁽²⁾ Other related party

⁽³⁾ Related party due to common ultimate shareholder

For the year ended December 31, 2001, CME expenses represent charges for consulting services and management fees. In 2001, consulting fees amounted to US $ 100 thousand and management fees amounted to US $ 650 thousand.

For the year ended December 31, 2001, Mirox transactions represent revenues from advertising activities and expenses for advertising in newspapers.

For the year ended December 31, 2001, FORZA CZ transactions represent marketing research expenses.

All related party transactions during the year ended December 31, 2000 comprised of:


	Revenues		Expenses

CME⁽⁺⁾		-		780
MARKÍZA-SLOVAKIA⁽⁺⁾		-		47
CNTS^(š)		-		3
TV Tip⁽³⁾		25		25
www.markiza.sk^(l)		23		2

Total		48		857

⁽¹⁾ Partner

⁽²⁾ Other related party

⁽³⁾ Related party due to common ultimate shareholder

Page 66

For the year ended December 31, 2000, CME expenses represent charges for consulting services and management fees. In 2000, consulting fees amounted to US $ 130 thousand and management fees amounted to US $ 650 thousand.

For the year ended December 31, 2000, MARKIZA-SLOVAKIA, s.r.o. expenses represent charges for consulting services in amount of US $ 13 thousand and re-invoicing of fines in amount of US $ 34 thousand.

For the year ended December 31, 2000, CNTS (TV Nova) expenses represent operational services. These operational services were charged to expenses during the year 2000.

(16) INCOME TAXES

The provision / benefit for income taxes is comprised of the following:


		2002			2001		2000

Current			731			972		229
	State		731			972		229
Deferred			(2,075	)		707		251

Total			(1,344	)		1,679		480

Significant components of the company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:


	Balance at 31.12.2002			Balance at 31.12.2001

Difference between tax and accounting depreciation of fixed assets		816			853
Reserve for wall of programes		229			259
Unrealized FX losses		22			218
Unrealized FX gains		(133	)		(9	)
Leasing adjustment		15			24
Not paid services		(9	)		166
NOL carried forward		-			-
Difference between tax and accounting depreciation of licences		803			505
Bad debt reserve		467			448
Subtotal		2,210			2,464
Valuation adjustment		(136	)		(2,464	)

Total		2,074			-

Due to the consistent positive performance of the Company over the last years, including the year 2002, the management has reassessed the recoverability of the deferred tax asset and decided to reverse major part of the valuation adjustment, which was created in previous years in respect of the deferred tax asset. The effect of this reversal has been accounted through a decrease of the tax expense for the current period.

In 2003 the income tax rate remain 25%. Deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2002 were calculated using the tax rate of 25%.

A valuation allowance has been provided for deferred tax assets whose recoverability is not more likely than not.

Page 67

The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory income tax rate to income before the provision for income taxes, as follows:


	2002			2001			2000

Income before income taxes		4,612			3,033			(2,703	)
Tax provision at statutory rate (25% in 2002 and 29% in 2001 and 2000)		1,153			880			(784	)
Non deductible write-off of receivables and goodwill		-			-			635
Effect in deferred tax of changes in tax rates		-			394			-
Tax expenses related to prior periods		28			132			-
Change in provision for deferred taxes		(2,362	)		(120	)		389
Other permanent differences incl. the effect of foreign exchange rates used for conversion		(163	)		393			240

Provision for income taxes		(1,344	)		1,679			480

(17) DIVIDED DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION – STATUTORY RESTRICTION

Distribution of dividends has to be approved by the General Assembly. Dividends cannot be distributed from the share capital or legal reserve fund.

In 2002 the company made loans to its shareholders, which under US GAAP have been reflected as distributions.

(18) CONCENTRATION OF CUSTOMERS

Revenues with advertising agencies accounting for more than 5% of the total net revenues and the relating receivables as of December 31, 2002 is as follows:


	Net revenues in 2002		Share on total spot revenues			Receivable as at 31.12.02

The Media Edge		5 511		13.82	%		1 370
Unimedia		5 192		13.01	%		979
Universal McCann Erickson		5 138		12.88	%		1 366
Optimum Media Operation		4 121		10.33	%		647
Credit partner		2 124		5.32	%		1 819


Total		22 086					6 181

Page 68

REVENUES WITH ADVERTISING AGENCIES ACCOUNTING FOR MORE THAN 5% OF THE TOTAL NET REVENUES AND THE RELATING RECEIVABLES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001 IS AS FOLLOWS:


	Net revenues in 2001		Share on total spot revenues			Receivable as at 31.12.01

The Media Edge		4 422		12,37	%		1 506
Unimedia		3 360		9,40	%		889
Pool Media Direction		2 608		7,29	%		133
Media Direction		2 464		6,89	%		899
CIA Slovakia		2 252		6,30	%		374
Universal McCann Erickson		2 241		6,27	%		701
CPM Slovakia		2 005		5,60	%		763
Optimum Media Opeartion		1 998		5,59	%		631
Credit Partner		1 940		5,42	%		1 744

Total		23 290					7 640

REVENUES WITH ADVERTISING AGENCIES ACCOUNTING FOR MORE THAN 5% OF THE TOTAL NET REVENUES AND THE RELATING RECEIVABLES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2000 IS AS FOLLOWS:


	Net revenues in 2000		Share on total spot revenues			Receivable as at 31.12.00

Unimedia		5 163		15,04	%		1 101
The Media Edge		4 618		13,45	%		1 347
Pool Media International		4 216		12,28	%		201
CIA Slovakia		2 078		6,05	%		719
Media Impact		2 028		5,91	%		610
Mediacom Praha s.r.o.		1 805		5,26	%		59

Total		19 908					4 037

(19) INTEREST EXPENSE AND REVENUES


	2002			2001			2000

Interest expense		(356	)		(289	)		(281	)
Tax penalty and interest		-			(258	)		-
Interest revenues		276			105			91
Other financial revenues		-			-			85

Total		(80	)		(442	)		(105	)

/s/ Frantisek Vizvary		/s/ Radka Doehring

Frantisek Vizvary		Radka Doehring

Page 69

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Central European Media Enterprises Ltd.

	By: /s/ Wallace Macmillan Wallace Macmillan Principal Financial Officer

	April 25, 2003

Page 70

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Frederic T. Klinkhammer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Central European Media Enterprises Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




Date: April 25, 2003	By:	/s/ Frederic T. Klinkhammer
		Frederic T. Klinkhammer
		Chief Executive Officer

Page 71

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Wallace Macmillan , certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Central European Media Enterprises Ltd.;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and




Date: April 25, 2003	By:	/s/ Wallace Macmillan
		Wallace Macmillan
		Principal Financial Officer

Page 72

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number	Description

99.01	Sarbanes-Oxley Certification – CEO and CFO, dated April 25, 2003

Page 73

Central European Media Enterprises 10-K/A2002 FY Annual report (amended)