UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORMN-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number811-08572
Bishop Street Funds
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
SEI Investments
One Freedom Valley Drive
Oaks, PA 19456
(Address of principal executive offices)
c/o SEI Investments
One Freedom Valley Drive
Oaks, PA 19456
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:1-800-262-9565
Date of fiscal year end: December 31, 2018
Date of reporting period: December 31, 2018
Item 1. | Reports to Stockholders. |
A copy of the report transmitted to stockholders pursuant to Rule30e-1 under the Investment Company Act or 1940, as amended (the “Act”) (17 CFR §270.30e-1), is attached hereto.
The Funds file their complete schedules of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on FormN-Q within sixty days after the end of the period. The Funds’ FormsN-Q are available on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling1-800-SEC-0330.
A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to determine how to vote proxies (if any) relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, by calling1-800-262-9565 or by visiting the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge, by calling1-800-262-9565 or by visiting the Funds’ website at http://www.bishopstreetfunds.com or the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
BISHOP STREET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FUNDS
2 | ||||
Definitions of Comparative Indices | 4 | |||
Dividend Value Fund | ||||
6 | ||||
10 | ||||
High Grade Income Fund | ||||
14 | ||||
17 | ||||
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund | ||||
25 | ||||
29 | ||||
38 | ||||
39 | ||||
40 | ||||
42 | ||||
46 | ||||
59 | ||||
60 | ||||
62 | ||||
64 |
1
![]() | Dear Shareholder:
2018 Market Review
After a tumultuous fourth quarter, the S&P 500 ended 2018 with a negative total return(-4.4%), the first down year since the financial crisis in 2008. The month of December was particularly harsh, with the S&P 500 declining about-9.0% and volatility rising sharply. |
Slowing global growth and the gradual removal of monetary policy accommodation were the key issues impacting markets, but trade friction with China (which is beginning to impact growth), lower oil prices, and the Federal government shutdown also affected investor confidence.
From a factor perspective, Growth beat Value in 2018 but both investment styles posted declines for the year (Russell 1000 Growth:-1.5%; Russell 1000 Value:-8.3%). Similarly, Large capitalization stocks outperformed Small capitalization stocks as the S&P 500 declined-4.4% while the Russell 2000 fell-11.0% over the last 12 months. A key characteristic of equity markets in 2018 was higher volatility as the S&P 500 gained/lost more than 1% in a day 10 times in December alone; in the entire year of 2017 this occurred only eight times. As a result, the VIX (a measure of implied volatility) ended the year at 25.4% which was up sharply from 11.0% in 2017.
The Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index was basically flat for the year (0.01%) as Treasuries (0.9%), Agencies (1.3%), and Mortgages (1.0%) outperformed investment grade Corporates(-2.1%) as risk appetite faded and worries mounted over rising corporate leverage. Because of this, High yield bonds also declined(-1.8%) in 2018, as lower quality credits (A rated:-2.5%; BAA rated:-2.8%) dragged on returns. Inflation was mostly kept in check for the year resulting in TIPS posting a negative return(-1.3%)1. Lastly, Municipal Bonds posted a positive return (1.3%) despite the elimination of advance refunding bonds that reduced supply. The provider of the data is Bloomberg Barclays.
In Hawaii, the local economy remains healthy but the rate of expansion has slowed, as expected. Economic growth is forecasted to continue at a gradual pace. The labor market remains tight with the unemployment rate at 2.6% in November. Despite the tight labor market, real wage and income gains remain lackluster. Visitor arrivals rose 4.5% and spending was virtually flat at 0.1% year over year in November1. Notwithstanding multiple natural disasters in 2018, the visitor industry is on pace for its seventh year in a row of record visitor numbers.
Bishop Street Funds |
2
Investment Outlook
With the uncertain economic environment, downside risks have risen but at the same time equities have become more attractively valued. In fixed income, the taxable yield curve continues to flatten with certain parts of the curve inverted. While an inverted yield curve (the difference between2-year and10-year yields) may signal a recession, it is not an infallible indicator. More importantly, recent comments from the Fed indicate they are not on autopilot and will adjust monetary policy depending on how the data develops. As a result, it is possible that a “soft landing” would allow the recovery to continue longer than generally expected.
Under these circumstances, we believe that portfolio diversification remains prudent and we are confident the Bishop Street Fund family will provide you with the strategies to help you build and maintain a diversified investment portfolio.
As always, thank you for your continued trust and confidence.
Sincerely,
Ken Miller, CFA
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer
Bishop Street Capital Management
February 7, 2019
1- State of Hawaii: Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism.
The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Index returns are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual Fund performance. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index.
Investing involves risk including possible loss of principal. Diversification does not protect against market loss.
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
3
BISHOP STREET
DEFINITIONS OF COMPARATIVE INDICES
FUNDS
Definitions of Comparative Indices
US Aggregate Bond Indexis the most common index used to track the performance of investment grade bonds in the U.S.
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Government/Credit Indexis a widely-recognized, market value weighted index of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government agency obligations, corporate debt backed by the U.S. government and fixed-ratenon-convertible corporate debt securities issued or guaranteed by foreign governments and agencies. All securities in the Index are rated investment grade (BBB) or higher, with maturities of at least one year.
Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Indexis a widely-recognized index of municipal bonds with maturities of at least one year.
Lipper Corporate A – Rated Debt Funds Objective – Funds that invest primarily in corporate debt issues rated “A” or better or government issues.
LipperLarge-Cap Core Funds Classification– Funds that, by portfolio practice, invest at least 75% of their equity assets in companies with market capitalizations (on a three-year weighted basis) above Lipper’s USDElarge-cap floor.Large-cap core funds have more latitude in the companies in which they invest. These funds typically have an averageprice-to-earnings ratio,price-to-book ratio, and three-yearsales-per-share growth value, compared to the S&P 500 Index.
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Objective– Funds that invest in municipal debt issues with dollar-weighted average maturities of five to ten years and are exempt from taxation on a specified city or state basis.
The Russell 1000 Growth Indexmeasures the performance of thelarge-cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 Index companies with higherprice-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The Russell 1000 Growth Index is constructed to provide a comprehensive and unbiased barometer for the large cap growth segment. The Russell 1000 Growth Index is completely reconstituted annually to ensure new and growing equities are included and that the represented companies continue to reflect growth characteristics.
The Russell 1000 Value Index measures the performance of thelarge-cap value segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 companies with lowerprice-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values. The Russell 1000 Value Index is constructed to
Bishop Street Funds |
4
provide a comprehensive and unbiased barometer for thelarge-cap value segment. The Index is completely reconstituted annually to ensure new and growing equities are included and that the represented companies continue to reflect value characteristics.
The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (S&P 500 Index)is an unmanaged list of common stocks which includes 500 large companies.
The Russell 1000® Index measures the performance of thelarge-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. It is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index and includes approximately 1,000 of the largest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. The Russell 1000 represents approximately 92% of the Russell 3000 Index. The Russell 1000 Index is constructed to provide a comprehensive and unbiased barometer for thelarge-cap segment and is completely reconstituted annually to ensure new and growing equities are reflected.
The Russell 2000® Index measures the performance of thesmall-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell 2000 Index is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index representing approximately 8% of the total market capitalization of that index. It includes approximately 2,000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. The Russell 2000 is constructed to provide a comprehensive and unbiasedsmall-cap barometer and is completely reconstituted annually to ensure larger stocks do not distort the performance and characteristics of the truesmall-cap opportunity set.
The ICE BofAML1-22 Year U.S. Municipal Securities Index is a subset of the ICE BofAML U.S. Municipal Securities Index including all securities with a remaining term to final maturity greater than or equal to 1 years and less than 22 years.
Ratings are measured on a scale that generally ranges from AAA (highest) to D (lowest).
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
5
Dividend Value Fund
Market overview
By most economic measures, 2018 will go down as a year of solid growth, rising job opportunities, bigger paychecks, ample credit and solid manufacturing data.
• | U.S. gross domestic product continued to advance at a rate in line with its long-term average: 3.2% in the third quarter; fourth-quarter data points to a solid year end. |
• | The labor markets added an average of 250,000 new jobs monthly during the fourth quarter, a figure that is more than ample to absorb new workers. |
• | Wages expanded by approximately 3.0% in 2018, well above the estimated rate of inflation. |
• | U.S. manufacturing conditions remained solid, but activity softened in December, and new orders were particularly disappointing. |
Despite these mostly positive factors, the financial markets were overwhelmed by global concerns in the fourth quarter, and asell-off in stocks and other risky assets left very few sectors untouched. Cooling global growth, protracted tariff disputes and lackluster Chinese economic data all contributed to investor pessimism as 2018 came to a close. The S&P 500 Index, a broad measure of U.S. stock market performance, lost-13.52% in the fourth quarter and ended the year down-4.38%, with dividends reinvested. Only two index sectors delivered positive returns: health care and utilities. Energy, materials and communication services recorded sharp losses.
In December, the Federal Reserve raised the range on its key short-term interest rate, the federal funds rate, to 2.25% — 2.50%, citing continued strong job growth and inflation in line with its 2.0% target. Fed Chairman Powell cut the estimate for 2019 rate hikes from three to two.
Bishop Street Funds |
6
Contributors and detractors
On a sector basis, energy, financials and health care were the best performers relative to the index. The strategy’s overweight in technology and positioning in communication services detracted from relative results.
• | In the energy sector, which was an overall poor performer for the quarter, we did well to underweight the sector and avoid energy equipment names as well as riskier exploration and production stocks. Our emphasis on cash flow steered us clear ofoil-levered names, which aided relative performance, as oil prices fell during the period. |
• | Within financials, where the strategy was overweight relative to the index, stock selection aided relative performance. An overweight position in CME Group produced positive performance for the portfolio. The company is one of two major players in the global futures and derivatives trading market. CME has a dominant position in rate-related trades, and there are high barriers to entry in its business. Overweight positions in Chubb and Marsh & McLennan, both insurance companies, also aided relative performance, as they lost less than the sector’s overall return in the index. The strategy had no exposure to Citigroup, whose shares fell sharply. |
• | In the technology sector, an overweight detracted from relative results, as the sector was an underperformer. Anout-of-index position in Apple significantly hampered returns, as its share price dropped sharply. |
• | In communication services, the strategy had positive relative results from Comcast and Disney, but these results were more than offset by lack of exposure to Verizon, which enjoyed solid positive performance. |
Outlook
Regardless of the market, which we cannot predict, we maintain a disciplined process that focuses on cash flow and quality, the latter of which we believe is more important now than it has been in some time. We seek companies with strong balance sheets and easy access to capital, a strategy that we believe has the potential to deliver solid performance over the long term.
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
7
BISHOP STREET
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION
FUNDS
The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost and current performance may be higher or lower than the performance quoted. For performance data current to the most recent month end, please visit www.bishopstreetfunds.com or call1-800-262-9565.
Index returns are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual Fund performance. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index.
This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding the funds or any security in particular.
Investing involves risk including possible loss of principal. Diversification does not protect against market loss.
A company may reduce or eliminate its dividend, causing losses to the fund.
Bishop Street Funds |
8
Dividend Value Fund |
Performance Comparison
Comparison of Change in the Value of a $1,000,000 Investment in
the Dividend Value Fund, Class I, versus the Russell 1000 Value Index
and the LipperLarge-Cap Core Funds Classification.
# Account value if you reinvested income and capital gains.
‡ Performance begins on April 30, 2006.
(1) See pages 4 - 5 for definitions of comparative indices.
Average Annual Total Returns† | ||||||||||||||||
One Year Return | Annualized 3 Year Return | Annualized 5 Year Return | Annualized 10 Year Return | |||||||||||||
(5.05 | )% | 8.98 | % | 7.82 | % | 12.67 | % | Dividend Value Fund, Class I* | ||||||||
(8.27 | )% | 6.95 | % | 5.95 | % | 11.18 | % | Russell 1000 Value Index | ||||||||
(5.66 | )% | 7.91 | % | 6.93 | % | 11.97 | % | LipperLarge-Cap Core Funds Classification |
* | Commenced operations on May 3, 2006. |
† | Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Fee waivers are in effect; if they had not been in effect, performance would have been lower. |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
9
Dividend Value Fund |
Top Ten Equity Holdings (Unaudited)†
Percentage of Investments | ||||||||
| ||||||||
1. | Johnson & Johnson | 4.3% | ||||||
| ||||||||
2. | JPMorgan Chase | 3.7% | ||||||
| ||||||||
3. | Microsoft | 3.7% | ||||||
| ||||||||
4. | Apple | 3.1% | ||||||
| ||||||||
5. | Cisco Systems | 3.0% | ||||||
| ||||||||
6. | Merck | 3.0% | ||||||
| ||||||||
7. | Pfizer | 2.7% | ||||||
| ||||||||
8. | Union Pacific | 2.3% | ||||||
| ||||||||
9. | Intel | 2.3% | ||||||
| ||||||||
10. | Comcast Cl A | 2.2% |
† | Percentages based on total investments. Top ten holdings do not include short-term investments. |
Schedule of Investments
Shares | Value (000) | |||||||
COMMON STOCK — 98.5% | ||||||||
Communication Services — 4.0% | ||||||||
10,723 | AT&T | $ | 306 | |||||
21,766 | Comcast Cl A | 741 | ||||||
2,899 | Walt Disney | 318 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,365 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Consumer Discretionary — 3.9% | ||||||||
5,154 | General Motors | 172 | ||||||
3,722 | Home Depot | 639 | ||||||
2,201 | McDonald’s | 391 |
Bishop Street Funds |
10
Dividend Value Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Shares | Value (000) | |||||||
Consumer Discretionary — (continued) | ||||||||
3,500 | TJX | $ | 157 | |||||
|
| |||||||
1,359 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Consumer Staples — 9.3% | ||||||||
7,579 | Altria Group | 374 | ||||||
1,603 | Hershey | 172 | ||||||
7,037 | Kellogg | 401 | ||||||
1,981 | Kimberly-Clark | 226 | ||||||
5,472 | PepsiCo | 604 | ||||||
8,022 | Philip Morris International | 536 | ||||||
4,136 | Procter & Gamble | 380 | ||||||
5,363 | Walmart | 500 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
3,193 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Energy — 6.8% | ||||||||
6,580 | Chevron | 716 | ||||||
7,404 | ConocoPhillips | 462 | ||||||
9,617 | Exxon Mobil | 656 | ||||||
8,125 | Suncor Energy | 227 | ||||||
3,833 | Valero Energy | 287 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,348 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Financials — 17.6% | ||||||||
19,328 | Bank of America | 476 | ||||||
7,228 | Bank of New York Mellon | 340 | ||||||
8,973 | BB&T | 389 | ||||||
763 | BlackRock | 300 | ||||||
4,591 | Chubb | 593 | ||||||
2,226 | CME Group | 419 | ||||||
13,177 | JPMorgan Chase | 1,286 | ||||||
7,203 | Marsh & McLennan | 574 | ||||||
3,804 | PNC Financial Services Group | 445 | ||||||
4,046 | Principal Financial Group | 179 | ||||||
2,179 | T Rowe Price Group | 201 | ||||||
8,624 | US Bancorp | 394 | ||||||
9,756 | Wells Fargo | 450 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
6,046 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Health Care — 14.5% | ||||||||
3,990 | Baxter International | 263 | ||||||
5,235 | Bristol-Myers Squibb | 272 | ||||||
3,335 | Eli Lilly | 386 | ||||||
2,442 | Gilead Sciences | 153 |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
11
Dividend Value Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Shares | Value (000) | |||||||
Health Care — (continued) | ||||||||
11,351 | Johnson & Johnson | $ | 1,465 | |||||
3,078 | Medtronic PLC | 280 | ||||||
13,391 | Merck | 1,023 | ||||||
21,477 | Pfizer | 937 | ||||||
773 | UnitedHealth Group | 192 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4,971 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Industrials — 13.4% | ||||||||
2,283 | 3M | 435 | ||||||
1,062 | Boeing | 343 | ||||||
1,548 | Cummins | 207 | ||||||
3,247 | General Dynamics | 510 | ||||||
5,379 | Honeywell International | 711 | ||||||
3,270 | Ingersoll-Rand PLC | 298 | ||||||
2,635 | Lockheed Martin | 690 | ||||||
1,687 | Parker-Hannifin | 252 | ||||||
5,702 | Union Pacific | 788 | ||||||
4,420 | Waste Management | 393 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4,627 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Information Technology — 18.3% | ||||||||
1,495 | Accenture PLC CL A | 211 | ||||||
6,756 | Apple | 1,066 | ||||||
2,704 | Automatic Data Processing | 355 | ||||||
1,243 | Broadcom | 316 | ||||||
23,950 | Cisco Systems | 1,038 | ||||||
16,627 | Intel | 780 | ||||||
2,873 | International Business Machines | 326 | ||||||
2,310 | Kla-Tencor | 207 | ||||||
1,185 | Lam Research | 161 | ||||||
12,518 | Microsoft | 1,272 | ||||||
5,940 | Texas Instruments | 561 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
6,293 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Materials — 2.4% | ||||||||
5,710 | DowDuPont | 306 | ||||||
2,469 | LyondellBasell Industries NV CL A | 205 | ||||||
976 | Packaging Corp of America | 81 | ||||||
4,305 | Sonoco Products | 229 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
821 | ||||||||
|
|
Bishop Street Funds |
12
Dividend Value Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(concluded)
Shares | Value (000) | |||||||
Real Estate — 2.1% | ||||||||
1,726 | Crown Castle International ‡ | $ | 187 | |||||
2,242 | Digital Realty Trust ‡ | 239 | ||||||
1,424 | Public Storage ‡ | 288 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
714 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Utilities — 6.2% | ||||||||
4,378 | Ameren | 286 | ||||||
4,086 | American Electric Power | 306 | ||||||
5,219 | CMS Energy | 259 | ||||||
2,285 | Dominion Resources | 163 | ||||||
4,172 | Eversource Energy | 271 | ||||||
1,678 | NextEra Energy | 292 | ||||||
4,594 | WEC Energy Group | 318 | ||||||
4,609 | Xcel Energy | 227 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,122 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCK (Cost $24,739) | 33,859 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
CASH EQUIVALENT — 1.5% | ||||||||
521,299 | BlackRock FedFund, Institutional Shares, 2.310% (A) (Cost $521) | 521 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS (Cost $25,260) — 100.0% | $ | 34,380 | ||||||
|
|
Percentages are based on Net Assets of $34,396 (000).
‡ | Real Estate Investment Trust |
(A) | The rate reported is the7-day effective yield as of December 31, 2018. |
Cl | — Class |
PLC | — Public Limited Company |
Cost | figures are shown in thousands. |
As of December 31, 2018, all of the Funds’ investments in securities were considered Level 1, in accordance with the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements and disclosure under U.S. GAAP.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, there have been no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 assets and liabilities. Transfers, if any, between levels are considered to have occurred at the end of the period.
There were no Level 3 investments during the year ended December 31, 2018.
For more information on valuation inputs, see Note 2 in the Notes to Financial Statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
13
High Grade Income Fund
In 2018, the U.S. economy continued its steady growth, supported by strong employment data, increasing wages, and stable inflation. As a result, the U.S. Federal Reserve continued to increase its short term interest rate, raising it 1.00%. Short-term interest rates now sit at 2.25%, the highest they have been in 10 years.
During the year, interest rates across all maturities increased greater than market expectations and credit (implied risk) spreads did as well. This resulted in modestly negatively returns for bond portfolios for the majority of the year. In December, we saw a reversal of this trend as the broad stock market experienced a sharp decrease of over 15%. During this period investors rotated into higher quality assets, specifically bonds. This resulted in positive returns in the last month of the year, helping to mitigate losses from earlier in 2018.
On a sector related basis, higher quality sectors, such as U.S. Treasuries and Mortgages, outperformed riskier sectors such as Corporate Bonds. Along the same lines, higher rated securities outperformed lower rated securities (ex. AA versus BBB). Lastly, longer maturity bonds underperformed shorter maturity bonds due to their greater sensitivity to the increase in interest rates.
For the calendar year, the Bishop High Grade Income Fund Class I posted a return of-1.21% and underperformed the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Government/Credit Index which finished the year down-0.42%. One positive driver of performance for the Fund included its allocation to high coupon securities while one negative driver was an overweight positioning in corporate credit.
Bishop Street Funds |
14
The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost and current performance may be higher or lower than the performance quoted. For performance data current to the most recent month end, please visit www.bishopstreetfunds.com or call1-800-262-9565.
Index returns are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual Fund performance. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index.
This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding the funds or any security in particular.
Investing involves risk including possible loss of principal. Diversification does not protect against market loss.
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
15
High Grade Income Fund |
Performance Comparison
Comparison of Change in the Value of a $1,000,000 Investment in the High Grade Income Fund, Class I, versus the Bloomberg Barclays Capital U.S. Government/Credit Index and the Lipper CorporateA-Rated Debt Funds Objective.
# Account value if you reinvested income and capital gains.
(1) See pages 4 - 5 for definitions of comparative indices.
Average Annual Total Returns† | ||||||||||||||||
One Year Return | Annualized 3 Year Return | Annualized 5 Year Return | Annualized 10 Year Return | |||||||||||||
(1.21 | )% | 1.25 | % | 1.96 | % | 3.27 | % | High Grade Income Fund, Class I | ||||||||
(0.42 | )% | 2.19 | % | 2.53 | % | 3.46 | % | Bloomberg Barclays Capital U.S. Government/ Credit Index | ||||||||
(1.80 | )% | 2.77 | % | 3.01 | % | 4.72 | % | Lipper CorporateA-Rated Debt Funds Objective |
† | Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Fee waivers are in effect; if they had not been in effect, performance would have been lower. |
Bishop Street Funds |
16
High Grade Income Fund |
Top Ten Holdings (Unaudited)†
Coupon Rate | Maturity Date | Percentage of Investments | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
1. | U.S. Treasury Bond | 4.375% | 05/15/41 | 2.9% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
2. | U.S. Treasury Bond | 6.000% | 02/15/26 | 2.7% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
3. | U.S. Treasury Bond | 3.125% | 05/15/48 | 2.6% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
4. | Amazon.com | 4.800% | 12/05/34 | 1.9% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
5. | GNMA,Ser 2012-91, Cl QL | 2.000% | 09/20/41 | 1.9% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
6. | FHLMC MTN | 1.500% | 08/25/21 | 1.8% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
7. | FHLMC MTN | 1.600% | 09/30/21 | 1.7% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
8. | U.S. Treasury Bond | 2.250% | 08/15/46 | 1.6% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
9. | FFCB | 2.000% | 06/01/21 | 1.6% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
10. | Apache Corp | 7.750% | 12/15/29 | 1.6% |
† | Percentages based on total investments. Top ten holdings do not include short-term investments. |
Schedule of Investments
Face | Value (000) | |||||||
CORPORATE OBLIGATIONS — 49.9% | ||||||||
Communication Services — 4.6% | ||||||||
Ameritech Capital Funding | ||||||||
$ | 300 | 6.875%, 10/15/27 | $ | 321 | ||||
CBS | ||||||||
175 | 3.500%, 01/15/25 | 167 | ||||||
Comcast | ||||||||
300 | 3.150%, 03/01/26 | 287 | ||||||
Verizon Communications | ||||||||
280 | 4.329%, 09/21/28 | 281 | ||||||
Walt Disney MTN | ||||||||
430 | 4.125%, 06/01/44 | 426 | ||||||
225 | 1.850%, 07/30/26 | 199 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,681 | ||||||||
|
|
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
17
High Grade Income Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Face | Value (000) | |||||||
Consumer Discretionary — 5.1% | ||||||||
Amazon.com | ||||||||
$ | 650 | 4.800%, 12/05/34 | $ | 696 | ||||
George Washington University | ||||||||
225 | 4.363%, 09/15/43 | 232 | ||||||
Home Depot | ||||||||
450 | 5.875%, 12/16/36 | 541 | ||||||
McDonald’s MTN | ||||||||
200 | 4.600%, 05/26/45 | 195 | ||||||
Starbucks | ||||||||
225 | 2.450%, 06/15/26 | 202 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,866 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Consumer Staples — 1.2% | ||||||||
Campbell Soup | ||||||||
125 | 4.250%, 04/15/21 | 127 | ||||||
Coca-Cola | ||||||||
200 | 2.450%, 11/01/20 | 199 | ||||||
Hershey | ||||||||
125 | 2.625%, 05/01/23 | 122 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
448 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Energy — 5.6% | ||||||||
Apache Corp | ||||||||
475 | 7.750%, 12/15/29 | 571 | ||||||
BP Capital Markets PLC | ||||||||
300 | 3.814%, 02/10/24 | 303 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP | ||||||||
150 | 4.300%, 05/01/24 | 150 | ||||||
Occidental Petroleum | ||||||||
390 | 2.700%, 02/15/23 | 378 | ||||||
Schlumberger Investment SA | ||||||||
400 | 3.650%, 12/01/23 | 402 | ||||||
Shell International Finance BV | ||||||||
250 | 1.875%, 05/10/21 | 243 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,047 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Financials — 14.6% | ||||||||
Aflac | ||||||||
450 | 3.625%, 11/15/24 | 450 | ||||||
Bank of America MTN | ||||||||
365 | 5.625%, 07/01/20 | 377 | ||||||
450 | 4.000%, 04/01/24 | 453 |
Bishop Street Funds |
18
High Grade Income Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Face | Value (000) | |||||||
Financials — (continued) | ||||||||
Bank of New York Mellon MTN | ||||||||
$ | 500 | 4.150%, 02/01/21 | $ | 510 | ||||
Capital One Financial | ||||||||
175 | 3.750%, 03/09/27 | 163 | ||||||
Citigroup | ||||||||
100 | 3.875%, 10/25/23 | 100 | ||||||
Discover Bank | ||||||||
200 | 4.200%, 08/08/23 | 200 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group MTN | ||||||||
250 | 3.977%, VAR ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month+1.300% 11/23/24 | 249 | ||||||
400 | 3.000%, 09/24/19 | 399 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase | ||||||||
500 | 2.250%, 01/23/20 | 495 | ||||||
MetLife | ||||||||
250 | 3.048%, 12/15/22 | 246 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley MTN | ||||||||
400 | 3.875%, 01/27/26 | 390 | ||||||
Prudential Financial MTN | ||||||||
305 | 7.375%, 06/15/19 | 311 | ||||||
Royal Bank of Canada MTN | ||||||||
280 | 2.150%, 03/06/20 | 278 | ||||||
US Bancorp MTN | ||||||||
450 | 3.000%, 03/15/22 | 447 | ||||||
Wells Fargo | ||||||||
300 | 2.150%, 01/15/19 | 300 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
5,368 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Health Care — 4.8% | ||||||||
AbbVie | ||||||||
500 | 2.900%, 11/06/22 | 486 | ||||||
Amgen | ||||||||
350 | 5.700%, 02/01/19 | 351 | ||||||
Celgene | ||||||||
250 | 3.875%, 08/15/25 | 241 | ||||||
CVS Health | ||||||||
250 | 2.875%, 06/01/26 | 228 | ||||||
Gilead Sciences | ||||||||
450 | 4.500%, 04/01/21 | 463 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,769 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Industrials — 2.6% | ||||||||
FedEx | ||||||||
125 | 2.625%, 08/01/22 | 122 |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
19
High Grade Income Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Face | Value (000) | |||||||
Industrials — (continued) | ||||||||
Norfolk Southern | ||||||||
$ | 150 | 2.900%, 06/15/26 | $ | 142 | ||||
Raytheon | ||||||||
260 | 2.500%, 12/15/22 | 253 | ||||||
United Technologies | ||||||||
450 | 3.100%, 06/01/22 | 441 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
958 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Information Technology — 7.0% | ||||||||
Apple | ||||||||
450 | 4.650%, 02/23/46 | 476 | ||||||
Applied Materials | ||||||||
400 | 3.900%, 10/01/25 | 403 | ||||||
200 | 3.300%, 04/01/27 | 192 | ||||||
Intel | ||||||||
500 | 3.300%, 10/01/21 | 505 | ||||||
International Business Machines | ||||||||
350 | 8.375%, 11/01/19 | 365 | ||||||
KLA-Tencor | ||||||||
200 | 4.650%, 11/01/24 | 205 | ||||||
Microsoft | ||||||||
250 | 3.625%, 12/15/23 | 257 | ||||||
NetApp | ||||||||
150 | 3.375%, 06/15/21 | 150 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,553 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Materials — 0.4% | ||||||||
Sherwin-Williams | ||||||||
140 | 3.125%, 06/01/24 | 134 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Transportation — 1.0% | ||||||||
Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC | ||||||||
345 | 4.450%, 03/15/43 | 351 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Utilities — 3.0% | ||||||||
Berkshire Hathaway Energy | ||||||||
400 | 6.125%, 04/01/36 | 479 | ||||||
Duke Energy Florida LLC | ||||||||
325 | 3.100%, 08/15/21 | 325 | ||||||
Xcel Energy | ||||||||
300 | 3.300%, 06/01/25 | 293 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,097 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
TOTAL CORPORATE OBLIGATIONS (Cost $18,517) | 18,272 | |||||||
|
|
Bishop Street Funds |
20
High Grade Income Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Face | Value (000) | |||||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY OBLIGATIONS — 17.1% | ||||||||
FFCB | ||||||||
$ | 350 | 3.220%, 12/10/25 | $ | 356 | ||||
300 | 2.670%, 04/18/24 | 298 | ||||||
600 | 2.000%, 06/01/21 | 592 | ||||||
300 | 1.750%, 08/01/22 | 291 | ||||||
500 | 1.240%, 11/29/19 | 493 | ||||||
FHLB | ||||||||
475 | 4.750%, 03/10/23 | 515 | ||||||
500 | 3.125%, 06/13/25 | 506 | ||||||
500 | 3.000%, 03/10/28 | 496 | ||||||
550 | 2.500%, 03/11/22 | 549 | ||||||
FHLMC MTN | ||||||||
350 | 3.000%, 12/18/20 | 350 | ||||||
550 | 2.050%, 08/26/22 | 538 | ||||||
650 | 1.600%, 09/30/21 | 632 | ||||||
675 | 1.500%, 1.625%, 08/25/19, 08/25/21 (A) | 660 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY OBLIGATIONS (Cost $6,330) | 6,276 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS — 17.1% | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bond | ||||||||
800 | 6.000%, 02/15/26 | 976 | ||||||
350 | 5.375%, 02/15/31 | 445 | ||||||
350 | 4.750%, 02/15/37 | 446 | ||||||
300 | 4.500%, 08/15/39 | 374 | ||||||
875 | 4.375%, 05/15/41 | 1,077 | ||||||
950 | 3.125%, 05/15/48 | 968 | ||||||
100 | 3.000%, 08/15/48 | 100 | ||||||
700 | 2.250%, 08/15/46 | 598 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Note | ||||||||
170 | 3.125%, 11/15/28 | 176 | ||||||
365 | 2.875%, 10/31/20 | 367 | ||||||
350 | 2.125%, 08/31/20 | 348 | ||||||
400 | 2.000%, 11/15/26 | 382 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
TOTAL U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS (Cost $6,344) | 6,257 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
MUNICIPAL BONDS — 9.0% | ||||||||
California State, GO | ||||||||
260 | 6.509%, 04/01/39 | 282 | ||||||
City of Seattle Washington, Ser B, GO | ||||||||
425 | 3.500%, 12/01/31 | 421 |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
21
High Grade Income Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Face | Value (000) | |||||||
MUNICIPAL BONDS — (continued) | ||||||||
Evansville Redevelopment Authority, GO | ||||||||
$ | 500 | 7.210%, 02/01/39 | $ | 532 | ||||
Gwinnett County, Development Authority, RB | ||||||||
375 | 4.180%, 09/01/47 | 377 | ||||||
Houston, Independent School District, GO | ||||||||
250 | 6.125%, 02/15/28 | 251 | ||||||
Hudson County, Improvement Authority, RB, AGM Insured | ||||||||
475 | 7.400%, 12/01/25 | 534 | ||||||
Stockton, Public Financing Authority,Sub-Ser, RB, BAM Insured | ||||||||
500 | 7.942%, 10/01/19,Pre-Refunded @ 100 (B) | 518 | ||||||
Texas State, GO | ||||||||
385 | 3.621%, 10/01/30 | 385 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (Cost $3,306) | 3,300 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY MORTGAGE-BACKED OBLIGATIONS — 4.9% | ||||||||
FHLMC, Ser 2015-4425, Cl BY | ||||||||
597 | 2.000%, 01/15/45 | 484 | ||||||
FHLMC, Ser G12710 | ||||||||
42 | 5.500%, 07/01/22 | 44 | ||||||
FNMA,Ser 2003-58, Cl D | ||||||||
35 | 3.500%, 07/25/33 | 35 | ||||||
FNMA,Ser 2012-84, Cl JB | ||||||||
217 | 3.000%, 05/25/42 | 205 | ||||||
FNMA,Ser 2013-92, Cl MT | ||||||||
41 | 4.000%, 07/25/41 | 43 | ||||||
FNMA, Ser 889958 | ||||||||
21 | 5.000%, 10/01/23 | 21 | ||||||
GNMA,Ser 2011-112, Cl JP | ||||||||
73 | 2.000%, 02/20/40 | 72 | ||||||
GNMA,Ser 2012-91, Cl QL | ||||||||
765 | 2.000%, 09/20/41 | 693 | ||||||
GNMA,Ser 2013-4, Cl CN | ||||||||
220 | 2.000%, 10/16/42 | 209 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT MORTGAGE-BACKED OBLIGATIONS (Cost $1,795) | 1,806 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
NON-AGENCY MORTGAGE-BACKED OBLIGATION — 0.9% | ||||||||
GSR Mortgage Loan Trust,Ser 2004-4, Cl 3A2 | ||||||||
341 | 3.510%, VAR US Treas Yield Curve Rate T Note Const Mat 1 Yr+1.750%, 04/25/32 (Cost $315) | 326 | ||||||
|
|
Bishop Street Funds |
22
High Grade Income Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Shares | Value (000) | |||||||
CASH EQUIVALENT — 1.4% | ||||||||
516,970 | BlackRock FedFund, Institutional Shares, 2.310% (C) (Cost $517) | $ | 517 | |||||
|
| |||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS (Cost $37,124) — 100.3% | $ | 36,754 | ||||||
|
|
Percentages are based on Net Assets of $36,638 (000).
(A) | Step Bonds — Represents the current rate, the step rate, the step date and the final maturity date. |
(B) | Pre-Refunded Security — The maturity date shown is thepre-refunded date. |
(C) | The rate reported is the7-day effective yield as of December 31, 2018. |
AGM — Assured Guaranty Municipal
BAM — Build America Mutual
Cl — Class
FFCB — Federal Farm Credit Bank
FHLB — Federal Home Loan Bank
FHLMC — Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FNMA — Federal National Mortgage Association
GNMA — Government National Mortgage Association
GO — General Obligation
ICE — Intercontinental Exchange
LIBOR — London Interbank Offered Rate
LLC — Limited Liability Corporation
MTN — Medium Term Note
PLC — Public Limited Company
RB — Revenue Bond
Ser — Series
USD — United States Dollar
VAR — Variable Rate
Cost | figures are shown in thousands. |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
23
High Grade Income Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(concluded)
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2018, in valuing the Fund’s investments carried at value (000):
High Grade Income Fund | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Corporate Obligations | $ | — | $ | 18,272 | $ | — | $ | 18,272 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agency Obligations | — | 6,276 | — | 6,276 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Obligations | — | 6,257 | — | 6,257 | ||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 3,300 | — | 3,300 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government Agency Mortgage-Backed Obligations | — | 1,806 | — | 1,806 | ||||||||||||
Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Obligation | — | 326 | — | 326 | ||||||||||||
Cash Equivalent | 517 | — | — | 517 | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | 517 | $ | 36,237 | $ | — | $ | 36,754 | ||||||||
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2018, there have been no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 assets and liabilities. Transfers, if any, between levels are considered to have occurred at the end of the period.
There were no Level 3 investments during the year ended December 31, 2018.
Amounts designated as “—” are $0.
For more information on valuation inputs, see Note in the Notes to Financial Statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Bishop Street Funds |
24
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund
Tax reform and the Federal Reserve continuing to tighten monetary policy weighed heavy on the municipal bond market for much of 2018. In the fourth quarter, demand rose amidst market volatility and a rapid decline in the equity market. This allowed the ICE BofAML1-22 Year US Municipal Securities Index to post a return of 1.35% for the year. Although declining in the fourth quarter, interest rates closed higher for the year. Interest rates on bonds due in two years increased 22 basis points while the yield on the 30 year bond increased 48 basis points. Unlike the Treasury curve which flattened in 2018, the municipal yield curve steepened as the long end of the curve underperformed for the year. The yield on the30-year bond closed the year a fraction higher than the yield on the30-year Treasury bond providing investors with attractive tax equivalent yields.
Hawaii’s economy remains strong with low unemployment, a stable real estate market, and a thriving tourist industry. While funded ratios on pension and OPEB (Other Post-Employment Benefits) continue to be a challenge, many reforms have been made to improve the sustainability of the State’s Employee Retirement System. These include an adjustment to the discount rate and increasing required contributions.
For the year, the Bishop Street Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund (Class I) returned 0.66% and underperformed the ICE BofAML1-22 Year US Municipal Securities Index which posted a 1.36% return. The Fund’s benchmark was changed from the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index to the ICE BofAML1-22 Year US Municipal Securities Index in May 2018. Positive drivers to performance were our allocation to revenue bonds and our shorter duration relative to the benchmark. Negative drivers include our under allocation to BBB rated credits and our under allocation to the intermediate part of the yield curve.
One basis point is 1/100 of one percent.
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
25
BISHOP STREET
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION
FUNDS
The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost and current performance may be higher or lower than the performance quoted. For performance data current to the most recent month end, please visit www.bishopstreetfunds.com or call1-800-262-9565.
Index returns are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual Fund performance. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index.
This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding the funds or any security in particular.
Investing involves risk including possible loss of principal. Diversification does not protect against market loss.
Bishop Street Funds |
26
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund |
Performance Comparison
Comparison of Change in the Value of a $1,000,000 Investment in the Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund, Class I*, versus the ICE BofAML1-22 Year US Municipal Securities Index, the Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Objective and the Bloomberg Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index.
# Account value if you reinvested income and capital gains.
(1) See pages 4 - 5 for definitions of comparative indices.
* | The graph is based on only Class I Shares; performance for Class A would be different due to differences in fee structures. |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
27
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund |
Average Annual Total Returns† | ||||||||||||||||
One Year Return | Annualized 3 Year Return | Annualized 5 Year Return | Annualized 10 Year Return | |||||||||||||
0.66 | % | 1.35 | % | 2.58 | % | 3.50 | % | Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund, Class I | ||||||||
0.34 | % | 1.06 | % | 2.31 | % | 3.24 | % | Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund, Class A | ||||||||
(2.69 | )% | 0.06 | % | 1.68 | % | 2.92 | % | Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund, Class A, with load** | ||||||||
1.36 | % | 2.03 | % | 3.30 | % | 4.33 | % | ICE BofAML1-22 Year US Municipal Securities Index | ||||||||
0.68 | % | 1.50 | % | 3.34 | % | 4.34 | % | Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Objective | ||||||||
1.28 | % | 2.30 | % | 3.82 | % | 4.85 | % | Bloomberg Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index |
** | Reflects 3.00% sales charge. |
† | Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Fee waivers are in effect; if they had not been in effect, performance would have been lower. |
Bishop Street Funds |
28
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund |
Top Ten Holdings (Unaudited)†
Coupon Rate | Maturity Date | Percentage of Investments | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
1. | Hawaii State, Department of Budget & Finance, Ser 2009 | 6.500% | 07/01/39 | 3.5% | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
2. | Hawaii State, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Lease Revenue, AMT | 5.000% | 08/01/27 | 3.2% | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
3. | Hawaii State, Department of Budget & Finance, Ser A | 5.000% | 07/01/35 | 2.7% | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
4. | Hawaii State, Airports System Authority, Ser A | 5.000% | 07/01/45 | 2.6% | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
5. | University of Hawaii, Ser F | 5.000% | 10/01/35 | 2.2% | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
6. | Hawaii State, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Lease Revenue, AMT | 5.000% | 08/01/21 | 2.2% | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
7. | Honolulu Hawaii City & County, Ser A | 5.000% | 09/01/41 | 2.1% | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
8. | Hawaii State, Airports System Authority, Ser A | 5.250% | 07/01/27 | 2.1% | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
9. | Hawaii State, Ser FK | 5.000% | 05/01/29 | 1.9% | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
10. | Hawaii State, Airports System Revenue, Ser A, AMT | 5.000% | 07/01/41 | 1.8% | ||||||||||||
|
† | Percentages based on total investments. Top ten holdings do not include short-term investments. |
Schedule of Investments
Face | Value (000) | |||||||
MUNICIPAL BONDS — 98.1% | ||||||||
Alaska — 0.5% | ||||||||
Alaska State, Ser A, GO | ||||||||
$ | 525 | 5.000%, 08/01/34 | $ | 592 | ||||
|
| |||||||
California — 3.2% | ||||||||
California State, GO | ||||||||
700 | 5.000%, 09/01/31 | 816 |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
29
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Face | Value (000) | |||||||
California — (continued) | ||||||||
Orange County, Water District, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
$ | 1,000 | 5.000%, 08/15/31 | $ | 1,127 | ||||
Sacramento City, Unified School District, GO | ||||||||
500 | 5.000%, 07/01/23 | 569 | ||||||
Sonoma County, Junior College District, GO | ||||||||
500 | 5.000%, 08/01/27 | 566 | ||||||
University of California, Ser AF, RB | ||||||||
215 | 5.000%, 05/15/23,Pre-Refunded @ 100 (A) | 245 | ||||||
785 | 5.000%, 05/15/36 | 866 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4,189 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Florida — 0.1% | ||||||||
Miami-Dade County, School Board, Ser D, COP | ||||||||
150 | 5.000%, 02/01/27 | 173 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Hawaii — 89.2% | ||||||||
Hawaii County, Ser A, GO | ||||||||
500 | 5.000%, 09/01/20 | 526 | ||||||
250 | 5.000%, 09/01/22 (B) | 277 | ||||||
300 | 5.000%, 09/01/26 | 354 | ||||||
1,500 | 4.000%, 09/01/35 | 1,581 | ||||||
Hawaii County, Ser B, GO | ||||||||
200 | 5.000%, 09/01/22 | 221 | ||||||
Hawaii County, Ser D, GO | ||||||||
450 | 5.000%, 09/01/25 | 529 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Airports System Authority, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
250 | 5.250%, 07/01/23 | 262 | ||||||
2,500 | 5.250%, 07/01/27 | 2,609 | ||||||
1,000 | 5.250%, 07/01/28 | 1,043 | ||||||
900 | 5.250%, 07/01/30 | 937 | ||||||
420 | 5.000%, 07/01/39 | 435 | ||||||
3,000 | 5.000%, 07/01/45 | 3,283 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Airports System Authority, RB, AMT | ||||||||
2,000 | 5.000%, 07/01/24 | 2,125 | ||||||
1,000 | 4.125%, 07/01/24 | 1,034 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Airports System Revenue, Ser A, RB, AMT | ||||||||
1,000 | 5.000%, 07/01/38 | 1,123 | ||||||
2,000 | 5.000%, 07/01/41 | 2,194 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Airports System Revenue, COP, AMT | ||||||||
500 | 5.250%, 08/01/25 | 554 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Department of Budget & Finance, Mid Pacific Institute, RB, AGC Insured | ||||||||
835 | 5.000%, 01/01/26 | 837 |
Bishop Street Funds |
30
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Face | Value (000) | |||||||
Hawaii — (continued) | ||||||||
Hawaii State, Department of Budget & Finance, Pacific Health Project, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
$ | 425 | 6.000%, 07/01/33 | $ | 485 | ||||
Hawaii State, Department of Budget & Finance, RB | ||||||||
325 | 5.125%, 07/01/31 | 357 | ||||||
275 | 5.000%, 07/01/20 | 287 | ||||||
350 | 3.250%, 01/01/25 | 350 | ||||||
500 | 3.100%, 05/01/26 | 492 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Department of Budget & Finance, Ser 2009, RB | ||||||||
4,260 | 6.500%, 07/01/39 | 4,346 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Department of Budget & Finance, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
205 | 5.000%, 07/01/22 | 225 | ||||||
575 | 5.000%, 07/01/26 | 638 | ||||||
800 | 5.000%, 07/01/27 | 916 | ||||||
755 | 5.000%, 07/01/30 | 854 | ||||||
3,000 | 5.000%, 07/01/35 | 3,333 | ||||||
1,000 | 4.000%, 07/01/40 | 1,018 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Department of Budget & Finance, Ser B, RB | ||||||||
775 | 5.000%, 07/01/28 | 855 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, Kapolie Office Facilities, Ser A, COP | ||||||||
500 | 5.000%, 11/01/26 | 593 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, RB | ||||||||
500 | 5.000%, 04/01/27 | 592 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Lease Revenue, COP, AMT | ||||||||
2,525 | 5.000%, 08/01/21 | 2,699 | ||||||
3,675 | 5.000%, 08/01/27 | 4,007 | ||||||
1,000 | 5.000%, 08/01/28 | 1,087 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Harbor System Revenue, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
2,000 | 5.625%, 07/01/40 | 2,100 | ||||||
220 | 5.000%, 07/01/25 | 229 | ||||||
1,125 | 4.250%, 07/01/21 | 1,161 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Highway Authority, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
700 | 5.000%, 01/01/23 | 779 | ||||||
1,450 | 5.000%, 01/01/30 | 1,641 | ||||||
1,000 | 5.000%, 01/01/33 | 1,124 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Highway Fund State, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
200 | 4.000%, 01/01/26 | 222 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Housing Finance & Development, Kuhio Park Terrace Multi-Family Housing, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
200 | 3.900%, 04/01/22 | 207 | ||||||
115 | 3.750%, 04/01/21 | 119 | ||||||
180 | 3.500%, 04/01/20 | 183 |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
31
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Face | Value (000) | |||||||
Hawaii — (continued) | ||||||||
Hawaii State, Housing Finance & Development, Rental Housing System, Ser B, RB, AGM Insured | ||||||||
$ | 2,000 | 6.500%, 07/01/33 | $ | 2,031 | ||||
Hawaii State, Housing Finance & Development, Single-Family Housing, Ser B, RB, GNMA/FNMA/FHLMC Insured | ||||||||
345 | 3.450%, 01/01/22 | 352 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Housing Finance & Development, Wilikina Apartments Project, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
1,000 | 5.000%, 05/01/34 | 1,012 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Pacific Health, Pacific Health Project, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
710 | 4.625%, 07/01/20,Pre-Refunded @ 100 (A) | 739 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Ser DT, GO | ||||||||
270 | 5.000%, 11/01/19 | 277 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Ser DZ, GO | ||||||||
1,795 | 5.000%, 12/01/21,Pre-Refunded @ 100 (A) | 1,953 | ||||||
200 | 4.000%, 12/01/31 | 208 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Ser EA, GO | ||||||||
935 | 5.000%, 12/01/21 | 1,018 | ||||||
1,700 | 5.000%, 12/01/22 | 1,848 | ||||||
Hawaii State,Ser EE-2017, GO | ||||||||
400 | 5.000%, 11/01/22,Pre-Refunded @ 100 (A) | 446 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Ser EF, GO | ||||||||
300 | 5.000%, 11/01/23 | 333 | ||||||
500 | 5.000%, 11/01/24 | 555 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Ser EH, GO | ||||||||
200 | 5.000%, 08/01/23 (B) | 226 | ||||||
605 | 5.000%, 08/01/23,Pre-Refunded @ 100 (A) | 684 | ||||||
125 | 5.000%, 08/01/24 | 141 | ||||||
300 | 5.000%, 08/01/29 | 335 | ||||||
295 | 5.000%, 08/01/30 | 329 | ||||||
95 | 5.000%, 08/01/32 | 106 | ||||||
Hawaii State,Ser EH-2017, GO, | ||||||||
85 | 5.000%, 08/01/23 (B) | 96 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Ser EO, GO | ||||||||
1,000 | 5.000%, 08/01/29 | 1,136 | ||||||
1,000 | 5.000%, 08/01/30 | 1,132 | ||||||
1,000 | 5.000%, 08/01/33 | 1,125 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Ser EP, GO | ||||||||
1,000 | 5.000%, 08/01/22 | 1,107 | ||||||
500 | 5.000%, 08/01/25 | 575 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Ser EY, GO | ||||||||
500 | 5.000%, 10/01/27 | 585 |
Bishop Street Funds |
32
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Face | Value (000) | |||||||
Hawaii — (continued) | ||||||||
Hawaii State, Ser FG, GO | ||||||||
$ | 880 | 5.000%, 10/01/30 | $ | 1,031 | ||||
200 | 5.000%, 10/01/31 | 233 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Ser FK, GO | ||||||||
2,000 | 5.000%, 05/01/29 | 2,374 | ||||||
Hawaii State,Ser FN-REF, GO | ||||||||
85 | 5.000%, 10/01/30 | 101 | ||||||
Hawaii State, Ser FT, GO | ||||||||
1,000 | 5.000%, 01/01/31 | 1,189 | ||||||
250 | 3.375%, 01/01/36 | 249 | ||||||
Honolulu Hawaii City & County, Board of Water Supply, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
1,050 | 5.000%, 07/01/19 | 1,067 | ||||||
600 | 5.000%, 07/01/23 | 661 | ||||||
400 | 5.000%, 07/01/24 | 460 | ||||||
600 | 5.000%, 07/01/27 | 684 | ||||||
Honolulu Hawaii City & County, Ser A, GO | ||||||||
275 | 5.250%, 08/01/21,Pre-Refunded @ 100 (A) | 298 | ||||||
400 | 5.000%, 11/01/21 | 434 | ||||||
500 | 5.000%, 11/01/22 (B) | 557 | ||||||
500 | 5.000%, 11/01/22,Pre-Refunded @ 100 (A) | 557 | ||||||
1,000 | 5.000%, 10/01/23 | 1,135 | ||||||
1,000 | 5.000%, 10/01/27 | 1,168 | ||||||
800 | 5.000%, 10/01/31 | 917 | ||||||
1,075 | 5.000%, 09/01/38 | 1,252 | ||||||
2,300 | 5.000%, 09/01/41 | 2,630 | ||||||
700 | 4.000%, 11/01/19 | 713 | ||||||
325 | 4.000%, 08/01/21,Pre-Refunded @ 100 (A) | 343 | ||||||
1,075 | 4.000%, 09/01/36 | 1,136 | ||||||
425 | 4.000%, 09/01/38 | 444 | ||||||
Honolulu Hawaii City & County, Ser B, GO | ||||||||
120 | 5.000%, 12/01/20 | 127 | ||||||
375 | 5.000%, 08/01/21 | 405 | ||||||
350 | 5.000%, 08/01/22 | 377 | ||||||
200 | 5.000%, 11/01/24 | 222 | ||||||
300 | 5.000%, 08/01/26 | 322 | ||||||
500 | 5.000%, 10/01/26 | 586 | ||||||
Honolulu Hawaii City & County, Ser C, GO | ||||||||
500 | 5.000%, 10/01/23 | 567 | ||||||
1,430 | 5.000%, 10/01/28 | 1,662 | ||||||
Honolulu Hawaii City & County, Ser Junior A, RB | ||||||||
450 | 4.000%, 07/01/25 | 461 |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
33
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Face | Value (000) | |||||||
Hawaii — (continued) | ||||||||
Honolulu Hawaii City & County, Wastewater System Authority, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
$ | 750 | 5.000%, 07/01/21,Pre-Refunded @ 100 (A) | $ | 808 | ||||
100 | 5.000%, 07/01/22,Pre-Refunded @ 100 (A) | 111 | ||||||
Honolulu Hawaii City & County, Wastewater System Authority, Ser B, RB | ||||||||
1,575 | 5.000%, 07/01/23 | 1,776 | ||||||
Honolulu Hawaii City & County, Wastewater System Revenue, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
255 | 5.000%, 07/01/21 | 274 | ||||||
150 | 5.000%, 07/01/22 | 166 | ||||||
500 | 5.000%, 07/01/36 | 568 | ||||||
1,200 | 4.000%, 07/01/38 | 1,252 | ||||||
Honolulu Hawaii City & County, Wastewater System Revenue, Ser B, RB | ||||||||
325 | 4.000%, 07/01/33 | 344 | ||||||
Kauai County, GO | ||||||||
250 | 5.000%, 08/01/37 | 288 | ||||||
Kauai County, Ser A, GO | ||||||||
250 | 5.000%, 08/01/21 | 270 | ||||||
500 | 5.000%, 08/01/23 | 552 | ||||||
250 | 4.000%, 08/01/24 | 267 | ||||||
250 | 3.250%, 08/01/23 | 258 | ||||||
Kauai County, Ser A, GO, NATL FGIC Insured | ||||||||
415 | 5.000%, 08/01/21 | 416 | ||||||
Maui County, GO | ||||||||
250 | 5.000%, 06/01/20 | 261 | ||||||
150 | 5.000%, 06/01/21 | 161 | ||||||
2,000 | 3.250%, 09/01/36 | 1,953 | ||||||
Maui County, Ser B, GO | ||||||||
500 | 4.000%, 06/01/21 | 515 | ||||||
University of Hawaii, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
100 | 6.000%, 10/01/19,Pre-Refunded @ 100 (A) | 103 | ||||||
University of Hawaii, Ser B, RB | ||||||||
1,500 | 5.000%, 10/01/34 | 1,715 | ||||||
1,000 | 4.000%, 10/01/23 | 1,085 | ||||||
University of Hawaii, Ser E, RB | ||||||||
1,485 | 5.000%, 10/01/25 | 1,738 | ||||||
1,350 | 5.000%, 10/01/32 | 1,556 | ||||||
University of Hawaii, Ser F, RB | ||||||||
2,425 | 5.000%, 10/01/35 | 2,798 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
112,769 | ||||||||
|
|
Bishop Street Funds |
34
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Face | Value (000) | |||||||
Indiana — 0.5% | ||||||||
Fort Wayne Community School Building, ST Intercept, RB | ||||||||
$ | 500 | 5.000%, 07/15/25 | $ | 553 | ||||
Indiana State, Housing & Community Development Authority, Ser C, RB, GNMA/FNMA/FHLMC Insured | ||||||||
70 | 4.100%, 06/01/27 | 72 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
625 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Kentucky — 0.9% | ||||||||
Kentucky State, COP | ||||||||
1,000 | 5.000%, 04/15/38 | 1,108 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
New York — 1.2% | ||||||||
New York & New Jersey, Port Authority, RB | ||||||||
350 | 5.000%, 11/15/47 | 397 | ||||||
New York City, Trust for Cultural Resources, Ser S, RB | ||||||||
1,000 | 5.000%, 07/01/41 | 1,118 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,515 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Oklahoma — 0.1% | ||||||||
Oklahoma City, Water Utilities Trust, RB | ||||||||
125 | 5.000%, 07/01/40 | 134 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Tennessee — 0.5% | ||||||||
Memphis, Ser A, GO | ||||||||
500 | 5.000%, 04/01/26 | 583 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Texas — 0.9% | ||||||||
Clifton, Higher Education Finance, Ser 2014, RB,PSF-GTD Insured | ||||||||
500 | 5.000%, 08/15/26 | 570 | ||||||
Midland County, Fresh Water Supply District No. 1, Ser A, RB (B) | ||||||||
1,000 | 4.789%, 09/15/37 (C) | 455 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,025 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Washington — 1.0% | ||||||||
Port of Seattle Washington, Ser A, RB | ||||||||
750 | 5.000%, 08/01/26 | 824 | ||||||
Washington State, Housing Finance Commission, RB, FANNIE MAE Insured | ||||||||
300 | 4.750%, 07/15/29 | 319 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,143 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (Cost $124,428) | 123,856 | |||||||
|
|
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
35
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(continued)
Shares | Value (000) | |||||||
CASH EQUIVALENT — 0.9% | ||||||||
1,185,578 | BlackRock FedFund, Institutional Shares, 2.310% (D) (Cost $1,186) | $ | 1,186 | |||||
|
| |||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS (Cost $125,614) — 99.0% | $ | 125,042 | ||||||
|
|
Percentages are based on Net Assets of $126,260 (000).
(A) | Pre-Refunded Security — The maturity date shown is thepre-refunded date. |
(B) | Security is escrowed to maturity. |
(C) | Zero coupon security. The rate reported on the Schedule of Investments is the effective yield at time of purchase. |
(D) | The rate reported is the7-day effective yield as of December 31, 2018. |
AGC — American Guarantee Corporation
AGM — Assured Guaranty Municipal
AMT — Alternative Minimum Tax
COP — Certificate of Participation
FGIC — Financial Guarantee Insurance Corporation
FHLMC — Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FNMA — Federal National Mortgage Association
GNMA — Government National Mortgage Association
GO — General Obligation
NATL — National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation
PSF-GTD — Guaranteed by Permanent School Fund
RB — Revenue Bond
Ser — Series
ST Intercept — State Intercept
Cost figures are shown in thousands.
Bishop Street Funds |
36
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund |
Schedule of Investments
(concluded)
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2018, in valuing the Fund’s investments carried at value (000):
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in Securities | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | $ | — | $ | 123,856 | $ | — | $ | 123,856 | ||||||||
Cash Equivalent | 1,186 | — | — | 1,186 | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | 1,186 | $ | 123,856 | $ | — | $ | 125,042 | ||||||||
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2018, there have been no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 assets and liabilities. Transfers, if any, between levels are considered to have occurred at the end of the period.
There were no Level 3 investments during the year ended December 31, 2018.
Amounts designated as “—” are $0.
For more information on valuation inputs, see Note 2 in the Notes to Financial Statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
37
Bishop Street Funds |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities (000)
December 31, 2018
Dividend Value Fund | High Grade Income Fund | Hawaii Bond | ||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||
Investments, at Cost | $ | 25,260 | $ | 37,124 | $ | 125,614 | ||||||
| ||||||||||||
Investments, at Value | $ | 34,380 | $ | 36,754 | $ | 125,042 | ||||||
Cash | 2 | — | — | |||||||||
Dividends and Interest Receivable | 60 | 311 | 2,120 | |||||||||
Reclaim Receivable | 1 | 1 | — | |||||||||
Receivable for Fund Shares Sold | — | — | 11 | |||||||||
Prepaid Expenses | 2 | 1 | 9 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Total Assets | 34,445 | 37,067 | 127,182 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Advisory Fees Payable | 15 | 6 | 5 | |||||||||
Administrative Fees Payable | 4 | 5 | 10 | |||||||||
Shareholder Servicing Fees Payable | 3 | 3 | 11 | |||||||||
Payable for Fund Shares Redeemed | 2 | 2 | 50 | |||||||||
Chief Compliance Officer Fees Payable | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Payable for Investment Securities Purchased | — | 356 | 556 | |||||||||
Income Distribution Payable | — | 26 | 207 | |||||||||
Trustees Fees Payable | — | — | 1 | |||||||||
Distribution Fees Payable, Class A | — | — | 4 | |||||||||
Other Accrued Expenses Payable | 24 | 30 | 76 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 49 | 429 | 922 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 34,396 | $ | 36,638 | $ | 126,260 | ||||||
| ||||||||||||
Paid-in Capital | $ | 24,752 | $ | 37,434 | $ | 127,150 | ||||||
Total distributable earnings/(loss) | 9,644 | (796 | ) | (890 | ) | |||||||
| ||||||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 34,396 | $ | 36,638 | $ | 126,260 | ||||||
| ||||||||||||
Class I Shares: | ||||||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 34,396 | $ | 36,638 | $ | 109,130 | ||||||
Outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest | 2,585 | 3,944 | 10,506 | |||||||||
Net Asset Value, Offering and Redemption Price Per Share — Class I (Net Assets / Shares Outstanding) | $ | 13.30 | * | $ | 9.29 | $ | 10.39 | |||||
| ||||||||||||
Class A Shares: | ||||||||||||
Net Assets | N/A | N/A | $ | 17,130 | ||||||||
Outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest | N/A | N/A | 1,648 | |||||||||
Net Asset Value, Offering and Redemption Price Per Share — Class A (Net Assets / Shares Outstanding) | N/A | N/A | $ | 10.39 | ||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Maximum Offering Price Per Shares — Class A ($10.39/97.00%) | N/A | N/A | $ | 10.71 | ||||||||
|
* | Net Assets divided by Shares do not calculate to the stated NAV because Net Assets are shown rounded. |
N/A – Not Applicable. Share class currently not offered.
Amounts designated as “—” are either $0 or have been rounded to $0.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Bishop Street Funds |
38
Bishop Street Funds |
Statements of Operations (000)
For the year ended December 31, 2018
Dividend Value Fund | High Grade Income Fund | Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund | ||||||||||
Investment Income: | ||||||||||||
Dividend Income | $ | 1,061 | $ | 12 | $ | 14 | ||||||
Interest Income | — | 1,350 | 4,019 | |||||||||
Less: Foreign Taxes Withheld | (1 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Total Investment Income | 1,060 | 1,362 | 4,033 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||
Investment Adviser Fees | 295 | 236 | 468 | |||||||||
Shareholder Servicing Fees | 100 | 107 | 334 | |||||||||
Administrative Fees | 80 | 86 | 268 | |||||||||
Chief Compliance Officer Fees | 2 | 2 | 7 | |||||||||
Distribution Fees, Class A | — | — | 46 | |||||||||
Transfer Agent Fees | 46 | 47 | 110 | |||||||||
Audit Fees | 15 | 15 | 50 | |||||||||
Printing Fees | 14 | 15 | 48 | |||||||||
Legal Fees | 13 | 15 | 46 | |||||||||
Trustees’ Fees | 8 | 9 | 26 | |||||||||
Custody Fees | 5 | 5 | 7 | |||||||||
Registration Fees | 2 | 19 | 13 | |||||||||
Pricing Fees | 1 | 10 | 27 | |||||||||
Miscellaneous Expenses | 8 | 8 | 26 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Total Expenses | 589 | 574 | 1,476 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Less Waivers: | ||||||||||||
Investment Adviser Fees | (85 | ) | (157 | ) | (340 | ) | ||||||
Shareholder Servicing Fees | (60 | ) | (64 | ) | (201 | ) | ||||||
Administrative Fees | (26 | ) | (28 | ) | (154 | ) | ||||||
| ||||||||||||
Total Waivers | (171 | ) | (249 | ) | (695 | ) | ||||||
| ||||||||||||
Total Net Expenses | 418 | 325 | 781 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | 642 | 1,037 | 3,252 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Net Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 3,900 | (438 | ) | (403 | ) | |||||||
Net Change in Unrealized Depreciation on Investments | (6,365 | ) | (1,349 | ) | (2,246 | ) | ||||||
| ||||||||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Loss on Investments | (2,465 | ) | (1,787 | ) | (2,649 | ) | ||||||
| ||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | (1,823 | ) | $ | (750 | ) | $ | 603 | ||||
|
Amounts designated as “—” are either $0 or have been rounded to $0.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
39
Bishop Street Funds |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (000)
For the years ended December 31,
Dividend Value Fund | High Grade Income Fund | |||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||
Investment Activities from Operations: | ||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 642 | $ | 645 | $ | 1,037 | $ | 1,314 | ||||||||
Net Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 3,900 | 2,805 | (438 | ) | 566 | |||||||||||
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Investments | (6,365 | ) | 4,259 | (1,349 | ) | 161 | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | (1,823 | ) | 7,709 | (750 | ) | 2,041 | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Distributions:(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Class I Shares | (4,809 | ) | (4,068 | ) | (1,056 | ) | (1,973 | ) | ||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Distributions | (4,809 | ) | (4,068 | ) | (1,056 | ) | (1,973 | ) | ||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from Shares Issued | 1,758 | 740 | 2,643 | 2,889 | ||||||||||||
Reinvestments of Cash Distributions | 2,805 | 2,425 | 712 | 1,278 | ||||||||||||
Cost of Shares Redeemed | (5,731 | ) | (4,252 | ) | (15,604 | ) | (14,746 | ) | ||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets from Capital Share Transactions | (1,168 | ) | (1,087 | ) | (12,249 | ) | (10,579 | ) | ||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | (7,800 | ) | 2,554 | (14,055 | ) | (10,511 | ) | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Beginning of Year | 42,196 | 39,642 | 50,693 | 61,204 | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
End of Year(2) | $ | 34,396 | $ | 42,196 | $ | 36,638 | $ | 50,693 | ||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Share Transactions: | ||||||||||||||||
Shares Issued | 111 | 48 | 283 | 297 | ||||||||||||
Shares Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 201 | 153 | 77 | 131 | ||||||||||||
Shares Redeemed | (357 | ) | (268 | ) | (1,673 | ) | (1,512 | ) | ||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Decrease in Shares Outstanding from Share Transactions | (45 | ) | (67 | ) | (1,313 | ) | (1,084 | ) | ||||||||
|
(1) | Current year presentation of distributions conforms withS-X Disclosure Simplification. Prior year distributions have been consolidated to conform withS-X Disclosure Simplification (See Note 11). |
(2) | Includes Dividend Value Fund and High Grade Income Fund undistributed net investment income of $5 and $1, respectively, in 2017. The SEC eliminated the requirement to disclose undistributed net investment income in 2018. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Bishop Street Funds |
40
Bishop Street Funds |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (000)
For the years ended December 31,
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund | ||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Investment Activities from Operations: | ||||||||
Net Investment Income | $ | 3,252 | $ | 3,297 | ||||
Net Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments | (403 | ) | 133 | |||||
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Investments | (2,246 | ) | 1,756 | |||||
| ||||||||
Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 603 | 5,186 | ||||||
| ||||||||
Distributions:(1) | ||||||||
Class I Shares | (2,845 | ) | (2,899 | ) | ||||
Class A Shares | (400 | ) | (460 | ) | ||||
| ||||||||
Total Distributions | (3,245 | ) | (3,359 | ) | ||||
| ||||||||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||||||
Class I Shares: | ||||||||
Proceeds from Shares Issued | 14,721 | 8,926 | ||||||
Reinvestments of Cash Distributions | 416 | 427 | ||||||
Cost of Shares Redeemed | (21,024 | ) | (14,503 | ) | ||||
| ||||||||
Total Class I Capital Share Transactions | (5,887 | ) | (5,150 | ) | ||||
| ||||||||
Class A Shares: | ||||||||
Proceeds from Shares Issued | 210 | 775 | ||||||
Reinvestments of Cash Distributions | 281 | 326 | ||||||
Cost of Shares Redeemed | (3,322 | ) | (3,426 | ) | ||||
| ||||||||
Total Class A Capital Share Transactions | (2,831 | ) | (2,325 | ) | ||||
| ||||||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets from Capital Share Transactions | (8,718 | ) | (7,475 | ) | ||||
| ||||||||
Total Decrease in Net Assets | (11,360 | ) | (5,648 | ) | ||||
| ||||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||
Beginning of Year | 137,620 | 143,268 | ||||||
| ||||||||
End of Year(2) | $ | 126,260 | $ | 137,620 | ||||
| ||||||||
Share Transactions: | ||||||||
Class I Shares: | ||||||||
Shares Issued | 1,418 | 841 | ||||||
Shares Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 40 | 40 | ||||||
Shares Redeemed | (2,032 | ) | (1,368 | ) | ||||
| ||||||||
Total Class I Transactions | (574 | ) | (487 | ) | ||||
| ||||||||
Class A Shares: | ||||||||
Shares Issued | 20 | 73 | ||||||
Shares Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 27 | 31 | ||||||
Shares Redeemed | (320 | ) | (324 | ) | ||||
| ||||||||
Total Class A Transactions | (273 | ) | (220 | ) | ||||
| ||||||||
Net Decrease in Shares Outstanding from Share Transactions | (847 | ) | (707 | ) | ||||
|
(1) | Current year presentation of distributions conforms withS-X Disclosure Simplification. Prior year distributions have been consolidated to conform withS-X Disclosure Simplification (See Note 11). |
(2) | Includes undistributed net investment income of $68 in 2017. The SEC eliminated the requirement to disclose undistributed net investment income in 2018. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
41
Bishop Street Funds |
Financial Highlights
For a share outstanding throughout the period ended December 31,
Investment Activities | Total Investment Activities from Operations | Dividends and Distributions from | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | Net Investment Income (Loss)(1) | Net Realized and Unrealized Gain(Loss) on Investments | Net Investment Income | Capital Gains | Total Dividends and Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DIVIDEND VALUE FUND |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class I Shares: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | $ | 16.05 | $ | 0.26 | $ | (1.04 | ) | $ | (0.78 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (1.71 | ) | $ | (1.97 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
2017 | 14.70 | 0.24 | 2.69 | 2.93 | (0.24 | ) | (1.34 | ) | (1.58 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 13.45 | 0.24 | 1.52 | 1.76 | (0.25 | ) | (0.26 | ) | (0.51 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 13.62 | 0.22 | (0.17 | ) | 0.05 | (0.22 | ) | — | (0.22 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 12.43 | 0.29 | 1.20 | 1.49 | (0.30 | ) | — | (0.30 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HIGH GRADE INCOME FUND |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class I Shares: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | $ | 9.64 | $ | 0.23 | $ | (0.35 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.22 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
2017 | 9.65 | 0.22 | 0.12 | 0.34 | (0.22 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.35 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 9.80 | 0.22 | (0.07 | ) | 0.15 | (0.22 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.30 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 10.05 | 0.23 | (0.19 | ) | 0.04 | (0.23 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.29 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 9.78 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.56 | (0.23 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.29 | ) |
(1) | Per share net investment income calculated using average shares. |
† | Total return is for the period indicated and has not been annualized. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Fee waivers are in effect; if they had not been in effect, performance would have been lower. |
Amounts designated as “—” are either $0 or have been rounded to $0.
Bishop Street Funds |
42
Net Asset Value, End of Period | Total Return† | Net Assets End of Period (000) | Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets | Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (Excluding Waivers) | Ratio of Net Investments Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | Portfolio Turnover Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 13.30 | (5.05 | )% | $ | 34,396 | 1.05 | % | 1.48 | % | 1.61 | % | 17 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
16.05 | 20.47 | 42,196 | 1.05 | 1.46 | 1.55 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14.70 | 13.16 | 39,642 | 1.05 | 1.43 | 1.70 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.45 | 0.44 | 46,246 | 1.05 | 1.38 | 1.62 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.62 | 12.08 | 55,665 | 1.05 | 1.37 | 2.27 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 9.29 | (1.21 | )% | $ | 36,638 | 0.76 | % | 1.34 | % | 2.42 | % | 22 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
9.64 | 3.56 | 50,693 | 0.76 | 1.29 | 2.30 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9.65 | 1.47 | 61,204 | 0.76 | 1.25 | 2.20 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9.80 | 0.37 | 72,251 | 0.76 | 1.21 | 2.31 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10.05 | 5.77 | 74,642 | 0.76 | 1.20 | 2.32 | 28 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
43
Bishop Street Funds |
Financial Highlights
For a share outstanding throughout the period ended December 31,
Investment Activities | Total Investment Activities from Operations | Dividends and Distributions from | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | Net Investment Income (Loss)(1) | Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | Net Investment Income | Capital Gains | Total Dividends and Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HAWAII MUNICIPAL BOND FUND |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class I Shares: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | $ | 10.58 | $ | 0.26 | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.07 | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | — | ^ | $ | (0.26 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
2017 | 10.45 | 0.25 | 0.14 | 0.39 | (0.25 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 10.80 | 0.27 | (0.30 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.26 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.32 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 10.88 | 0.29 | (0.01 | ) | 0.28 | (0.29 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.36 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 10.52 | 0.29 | 0.38 | 0.67 | (0.29 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.31 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A Shares: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | $ | 10.58 | $ | 0.23 | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | 0.03 | $ | (0.22 | ) | $ | — | ^ | $ | (0.22 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
2017 | 10.45 | 0.23 | 0.13 | 0.36 | (0.22 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.23 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 10.80 | 0.24 | (0.29 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.24 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.30 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 10.88 | 0.26 | (0.01 | ) | 0.25 | (0.26 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.33 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 10.52 | 0.26 | 0.38 | 0.64 | (0.26 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.28 | ) |
(1) | Per share net investment income calculated using average shares. |
† | Total return is for the period indicated and has not been annualized. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Fee waivers are in effect; if they had not been in effect, performance would have been lower. |
^ | Amount is less than 0.005. |
Amounts designated as “—” are either $0 or have been rounded to $0.
Bishop Street Funds |
44
Net Asset Value, End of Period | Total Return† | Net Assets End of Period (000) | Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets | Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (Excluding Waivers) | Ratio of Net Investments Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | Portfolio Turnover Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 10.39 | 0.66 | % | $ | 109,130 | 0.55 | % | 1.07 | % | 2.47 | % | 21 | % | |||||||||||||
10.58 | 3.74 | 117,285 | 0.55 | 1.04 | 2.39 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.45 | (0.32 | ) | 120,894 | 0.55 | 1.02 | 2.45 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||
10.80 | 2.61 | 127,712 | 0.55 | 0.98 | 2.64 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.88 | 6.36 | 132,540 | 0.55 | 0.99 | 2.66 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 10.39 | 0.34 | % | $ | 17,130 | 0.80 | % | 1.32 | % | 2.21 | % | 21 | % | |||||||||||||
10.58 | 3.46 | 20,335 | 0.80 | 1.29 | 2.14 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.45 | (0.57 | ) | 22,374 | 0.80 | 1.27 | 2.20 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||
10.80 | 2.36 | 22,959 | 0.80 | 1.23 | 2.39 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.88 | 6.10 | 22,324 | 0.80 | 1.24 | 2.41 | 27 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
45
Bishop Street Funds |
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2018
The amounts included in the Notes to Financial Statements are in thousands unless otherwise noted.
1. | ORGANIZATION |
The Bishop Street Funds (the “Trust”) are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as anopen-end, management investment company. The Bishop Street Funds consist of a series of three funds (each a Fund, collectively the “Funds”) which includes Dividend Value Fund, High Grade Income Fund, and the Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund. Each Fund is diversified, with the exception of Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund, which isnon-diversified. Class A Shares of the Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund are subject to a sales load as disclosed in the prospectus. The assets of each Fund are segregated, and a shareholder’s interest is limited to the Fund in which shares are held. The Funds’ prospectus provides a description of each Fund’s investment objectives, policies and strategies.
2. | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
The following are significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Funds. The Funds are investment companies that apply the accounting and reporting guidance issued in Topic 946 by the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”).
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the fair value of assets, the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences could be material.
Security Valuation
The Funds’ investments in equity securities listed on a securities exchange, market or automated quotation system for which quotations are readily available (except for securities traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market (the “NASDAQ”)) including securities traded over the counter, are valued at the last quoted sale price on an exchange or market (foreign or domestic) on which they are traded on valuation date (or at approximately 4:00 pm ET if a security’s primary exchange is normally open at that time), or, if there is no such reported sale on the valuation date, at the most recent quoted bid price. For securities traded on NASDAQ, the NASDAQ Official Closing Price will be used. Debt securities are priced based upon valuations provided by independent, third-party pricing agents, if available.
Bishop Street Funds |
46
Such values generally reflect the last reported sales price in the most advantageous market, if the security is actively traded. The third-party pricing agents may also value debt securities at an evaluated bid price by employing methodologies that utilize actual market transactions, broker-supplied valuations, or other methodologies designed to identify the fair value for such securities. Such methodologies typically include matrix systems which reflect such factors as security prices, yields, maturities and ratings. Debt obligations with remaining maturities of sixty days or less may be valued at their amortized cost, which approximates market value provided that it is determined the amortized cost continues to approximate fair value. Should existing credit, liquidity or interest rate conditions in the relevant markets and issuer specific circumstances suggest that amortized cost does not approximate fair value, then the amortized cost method may not be used. Prices for most securities held in the Funds are provided daily by recognized independent pricing agents.
If a security price cannot be obtained from an independent, third-party pricing agent, the Funds seek to obtain a bid price from at least one independent broker.
Securities for which market prices are not “readily available” are valued in accordance with Fair Value Procedures established by the Funds’ Board of Trustees (the “Board”). The Funds’ Fair Value Procedures are implemented through a Fair Value Pricing Committee (the “Committee”) designated by the Funds’ Board. Some of the more common reasons that may necessitate that a security be valued using Fair Value Procedures include: the security’s trading has been halted or suspended; the security has been delisted from a national exchange; the security’s primary trading market is temporarily closed at a time when under normal conditions it would be open; or the security’s primary pricing source is not able or willing to provide a price. When a security is valued in accordance with the Fair Value Procedures, the Committee will determine the value after taking into consideration relevant information reasonably available to the Committee.
In accordance with the authoritative guidance on fair value measurement under U.S. GAAP, the Funds disclose fair value of their investments in a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure the fair value. The objective of a fair value measurement is to determine the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). Accordingly, the fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
• | Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities that the Funds have the ability to access at the measurement date; |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
47
Bishop Street Funds |
• | Level 2 — Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, referenced indices, quoted prices in inactive markets, adjusted quoted prices in active markets, etc.); and |
• | Level 3 — Prices, inputs or exotic modeling techniques which are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity). |
Investments are classified within the level of the lowest significant input considered in determining fair value. Investments classified within Level 3 whose fair value measurement considers several inputs may include Level 1 or Level 2 inputs as components of the overall fair value measurement.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, there have been no changes to the Funds’ fair value methodologies.
Federal Income Taxes
It is each Fund’s intention to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company for Federal income tax purposes by complying with the appropriate provisions ofSub-chapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and to distribute substantially all of its income to shareholders. Accordingly, no provision for Federal income taxes has been made in the financial statements.
The Funds evaluate tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Funds’ tax returns to determine whether it is “more-likely-than- not” (i.e., greater than50-percent) that each tax position will be sustained upon examination by a taxing authority based on the technical merits of the position. Tax positions not deemed to meet themore-likely-than-not threshold are recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. The Funds did not record any tax provision in the current period. However, management’s conclusions regarding tax positions taken may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, examination by tax authorities (i.e., the last 3 open tax year ends, as applicable),on-going analysis of and changes to tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof.
Security Transactions and Investment Income
Security transactions are accounted for on trade date. Costs used in determining net realized capital gains and losses on the sale of securities are on the basis of specific identification. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis from settlement date and dividend income is recorded onex-dividend date.
Discounts and premiums are accreted or amortized using the effective interest method over the life of each security and are recorded as interest income. Realized gains (losses) on paydowns of mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are recorded as an adjustment to interest income.
Bishop Street Funds |
48
Classes
Class-specific expenses are borne by the applicable class of shares. Income, realized and unrealized gains/losses andnon-class-specific expenses are allocated to the respective class on the basis of relative daily net assets. Distribution fees are the only class-specific expense.
Expenses
Expenses that are directly related to one of the Funds are charged directly to that Fund. Other operating expenses of the Trust are prorated to each of the Funds on the basis of relative net assets.
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders
The Dividend Value Fund declares and pays dividends from net investment income, if available, on a quarterly basis. Dividends from net investment income are declared daily and paid on a monthly basis for the High Grade Income and Hawaii Municipal Bond. Any net realized capital gains will be distributed at least annually for all Funds. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on theex-dividend date.
Front-End Sales Commission
Front-end sales commissions (the “sales charges”) are not recorded as expenses of the Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund. Sales charges are deducted from proceeds from the sales of Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund shares prior to investment in Class A shares.
Cash Overdraft Charges
Per the terms of the agreement with MUFG Union Bank, N.A., the custodian of the Funds (the “Custodian”), if a Fund has a cash overdraft on a given day, it will be assessed an overdraft charge of the Prime Rate plus 4.00%. Cash overdraft charges are included in miscellaneous expenses on the Statements of Operations. For the year ended December 31, 2018, there were no cash overdraft charges.
3. | INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT |
Investment advisory services are provided to the Funds by Bishop Street Capital Management (the “Adviser”), a registered adviser and wholly owned subsidiary of First Hawaiian Bank. First Hawaiian Bank is a subsidiary of BancWest Corporation, itself a subsidiary of BNP Paribas. The Adviser is entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.74% of the average daily net assets of the Dividend Value Fund, 0.55% of the average daily net assets of the High Grade Income Fund, and 0.35% of the average daily net assets of the Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund. The Adviser has contractually agreed, through April 30, 2019, to waive a portion of its advisory fee (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, and extraordinary expenses (collectively,
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
49
Bishop Street Funds |
excluded expenses) to the extent necessary to keep operating expenses at or below certain percentages of the respective average daily net assets. The contractual expense limitations are as follows:
Dividend Value Fund, Class I Shares | 1.05 | % | ||
High Grade Income Fund, Class I Shares | 0.76 | % | ||
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund, Class I Shares | 0.55 | % | ||
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund, Class A Shares | 0.80 | % |
If at any point it becomes unnecessary for the Adviser to reduce fees and make expense reimbursements, the Board may permit the Adviser to retain the difference between the Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses and contractual expense limitations to recapture all or a portion of its prior expense reductions or reimbursements made during the preceding three year period during which this agreement was in place. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Adviser did not recapture any previously waived fees.
As of December 31, 2018, fees which were previously waived by the Investment Manager which may be subject to possible future reimbursement to the Adviser were as follows:
Dividend | High Grade Income Fund | Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund | Total | Expires | ||||||||||||||
73 | 191 | 319 | 583 | 12/31/2019 | ||||||||||||||
87 | 186 | 338 | 611 | 12/31/2020 | ||||||||||||||
85 | 157 | 340 | 582 | 12/31/2021 |
Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC (“Columbia”) serves as the investmentsub-adviser for the Dividend Value Fund, pursuant to asub-adviser agreement. Columbia is entitled to receive from the Adviser a fee, computed daily and paid monthly, at the annual rate based on the average daily net assets of the Dividend Value Fund, under the following fee schedule: 0.360% on the first $75 million; 0.350% on the next $75 million; 0.325% on the next $100 million; 0.300% on the next $250 million; and 0.250% on assets over $500 million.
4. | ADMINISTRATIVE, CUSTODIAN, TRANSFER AGENT, DISTRIBUTION AND SHAREHOLDER SERVICES |
The Funds and the Administrator are parties to an Administration Agreement under which the Administrator provides administrative services to the Funds. For these services, the Administrator is paid an asset based fee which will vary depending on the number of share classes and the average daily net assets of the Funds. The Administrator
Bishop Street Funds |
50
has voluntarily agreed to waive 0.08% of its administrative fee on each of the Funds’ average daily net assets excluding the Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund for which the Administrator is waiving 0.13% of its fee. These fee waivers are voluntary and may be discontinued at any time. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Funds were charged as follows for these services: $80 in the Dividend Value Fund, $86 in the High Grade Income Fund, and $268 in the Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Funds waived as follows for these services: $26 in the Dividend Value Fund, $28 in the High Grade Income Fund, and $154 in the Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund. These fees and waivers are labeled as “Administrative Fees/Waivers” on the Statement of Operations.
The Custodian plays no role in determining the investment policies of the Funds or which securities are to be purchased or sold by the Funds. These fees are labeled on the Statement of Operations as “Custody Fees.”
DST Systems, Inc. (“DST”) acts as the Transfer Agent of the Funds. As such, DST provides transfer agency, dividend disbursing and shareholder services to the Funds. These fees are disclosed on the Statement of Operations as “Transfer Agent Fees.”
SEI Investments Distribution Co. (“SIDCO”), the “Distributer” a wholly owned subsidiary of SEI Investments Company, acts as the Trust’s Distributor pursuant to the distribution agreement. The Funds have adopted a Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) on behalf of Class A Shares pursuant to Rule12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The Plan provides that Class A Shares will bear the cost of their distribution expenses. SIDCO, as compensation for its services under the Plan, receives a distribution fee, computed daily and payable monthly, of 0.25% of the average daily net assets attributable to each Fund’s Class A Shares. This fee is disclosed as “Distribution Fees, Class A” on the Statement of Operations.
The Trust has adopted and entered into a shareholder service plan and agreement with SIDCO. Each Fund pays to SIDCO a shareholder servicing fee not to exceed an annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net asset value of all shares of each fund, which is computed daily and paid monthly. Under the shareholder service plan, SIDCO may perform, or may compensate other service providers for performing various shareholder and administrative services. SIDCO may also retain as profit any difference between the fee it receives and amount it pays to third parties. For the year, SIDCO paid the entire amount of fees received under the shareholder service plan to First Hawaiian Bank, the Parent Company of Bishop Street Capital Management, for shareholder services performed by First Hawaiian Bank on behalf of SIDCO for the benefit of certain shareholders to the Funds. SIDCO has voluntarily agreed to waive 0.15% of its shareholder servicing fee to the extent necessary to keep operating expenses at or below certain percentages of the respective average daily net assets. These fees and waivers are represented as “Shareholder Servicing Fees/Waivers” on the Statement of Operations.
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
51
Bishop Street Funds |
5. | TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES |
Certain officers of the Trust are also officers of SEI Investments Global Funds Services (the “Administrator”), a wholly owned subsidiary of SEI Investments Company, and/or SIDCO. Such officers are paid no fees by the Trust other than the Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) as described below, for serving as officers of the Trust.
A portion of the services provided by the CCO and his staff, who are employees of the Administrator, are paid for by the Trust as incurred. The services include regulatory oversight of the Trust’s Advisers and service providers as required by SEC regulations. The CCO’s services and expenses have been approved by and are reviewed by the Board. These fees are disclosed on the Statement of Operations as “Chief Compliance Officer Fees.”
6. | INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS |
The cost of security purchases and the proceeds from the sale and maturities of securities, other than short-term investments, for the year ended December 31, 2018 are presented below for the Funds.
Dividend Value Fund | High Grade Income Fund | Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund | ||||||||||
Purchases | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government Securities | $ | — | $ | 4,437 | $ | — | ||||||
Other | 6,775 | 4,609 | 27,653 | |||||||||
Sales and Maturities | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government Securities | $ | — | $ | 5,887 | $ | — | ||||||
Other | 10,937 | 13,742 | 34,320 |
7. | FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION |
The timing and characterization of certain income and capital gains distributions are determined annually in accordance with Federal tax regulations which may differ from U.S. GAAP.
As a result, net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions for the reporting period may differ from distributions during such period. These book/tax differences may be temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent, they are charged or credited topaid-in capital and undistributed earnings, in the period that the differences arise. The permanent differences are primarily attributed to investments in paydown gains and losses, and REIT adjustments.
Bishop Street Funds |
52
The tax character of dividends and distributions declared during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Tax Exempt Income | Long Term Capital Gain | Total | |||||||||||||
Dividend Value Fund |
| |||||||||||||||
2018 | $ | 666 | $ | — | $ | 4,143 | $ | 4,809 | ||||||||
2017 | 676 | — | 3,392 | 4,068 | ||||||||||||
High Grade Income Fund |
| |||||||||||||||
2018 | $ | 1,029 | $ | — | $ | 27 | $ | 1,056 | ||||||||
2017 | 1,314 | — | 659 | 1,973 | ||||||||||||
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund |
| |||||||||||||||
2018 | $ | 13 | $ | 3,221 | $ | 11 | $ | 3,245 | ||||||||
2017 | 1 | 3,277 | 81 | 3,359 |
As of December 31, 2018, the components of Distributable Earnings (Accumulated Losses) on a tax basis were as follows:
Dividend Value Fund | High Grade Income Fund | Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund | ||||||||||
Undistributed Ordinary Income | $ | 37 | $ | 2 | $ | 4 | ||||||
Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gain | 505 | — | — | |||||||||
Capital Loss Carryforwards | — | (340 | ) | (363 | ) | |||||||
Post October Losses | — | (89 | ) | (41 | ) | |||||||
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | 9,102 | (370 | ) | (491 | ) | |||||||
Other Temporary Differences | — | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Distributable Earnings (Accumulated Losses) | $ | 9,644 | $ | (796 | ) | $ | (890 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-October losses represent losses realized on investment transactions from November 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 that, in accordance with Federal income tax regulations, the Funds may defer and treat as having arisen in the following fiscal year.
For Federal income tax purposes, capital losses incurred may be carried forward and applied against future capital gains. Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, Funds are permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an unlimited period. Additionally, post enactment capital losses that are carried forward will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered all short-term as under previous law.
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
53
Bishop Street Funds |
Capital loss carryforwards, all of which are not subject to expiration are as follows:
Short-Term Loss | Long-Term Loss | Total | ||||||||||
High Grade Income Fund | $ | 58 | $ | 282 | $ | 340 | ||||||
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund | 93 | 270 | 363 |
For Federal income tax purposes, the cost of securities owned at December 31, 2018, and the net realized gains or losses on securities sold for the period were not materially different from amounts reported for financial reporting purposes. These differences are primarily due to wash sales which cannot be used for Federal income tax purposes in the current year and have been deferred for use in future years. The Federal tax cost and aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation for the investments (including foreign currency and derivatives, if applicable) held by the Funds at December 31, 2018, were as follows:
Dividend Value Fund | High Grade Income Fund | Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund | ||||||||||
Federal Tax Cost | $ | 25,278 | $ | 37,124 | $ | 125,533 | ||||||
Gross Unrealized Appreciation | 9,908 | 402 | 976 | |||||||||
Gross Unrealized Depreciation | (806 | ) | (772 | ) | (1,467 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | $ | 9,102 | $ | (370 | ) | $ | (491 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. | RISKS |
The Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund invests primarily in debt instruments in the state of Hawaii. The issuers’ ability to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in that state. In addition, the High Grade Income and Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund’s investments in debt securities are subject to “credit risk,” which is the risk that an issuer will be unable, or will be perceived to be unable, to repay its obligations at maturity and “interest rate risk” which is the potential for fluctuations in bond prices due to changing interest rates. Funds that invest primarily in high quality debt securities generally are subject to less credit risk than funds that invest in lower quality debt securities.
Certain debt securities are backed by credit enhancements from various financial institutions and financial guarantee assurance agencies. These credit enhancements reinforce the credit quality of the individual securities; however, if any of the financial institutions or financial guarantee assurance agencies’ credit quality should deteriorate, it could cause the individual security’s credit quality to change. Additionally, if any of the Funds concentrate their credit enhancements in any one financial institution, the risk of credit quality deterioration increases. The following tables provide detail on the approximate percentage of High Grade Income Fund’s and Hawaii Municipal Bond
Bishop Street Funds |
54
Fund’s investments in securities with these types of enhancements, as well as the name of the entity providing the largest proportion of enhancements in the Funds.
High Grade Income Fund | ||
% of investments in securities with credit enhancements or liquidity enhancements | 2.86% | |
Largest % of investments in securities with credit enhancements or liquidity enhancements from a single institution | 1.45% (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation) |
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund | ||
% of investments in securities with credit enhancements or liquidity enhancements | 3.86% | |
Largest % of investments in securities with credit enhancements or liquidity enhancements from a single institution | 1.62% (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation) |
The value of asset-backed securities may be affected by the credit risk of the servicing agent for the pool, the originator of the loans or receivables, or the financial institution(s) providing the credit support. In addition to credit risk, asset-backed securities and other securities with early redemption features are subject topre-payment risk. During periods of declining interest rates, prepayment of loans underlying asset-backed securities can be expected to accelerate or an issuer may retire an outstanding bond early to reduce interest costs. A Fund’s ability to maintain positions in such securities will be affected by reductions in the principal amount of such securities resulting from prepayments, and its ability to reinvest the returns of principal at comparable yields is subject to the general prevailing interest rates at that time.
The market value of the Funds’ investments in fixed income securities may change in response to interest rate changes and other factors. During periods of falling interest rates, the values of fixed income securities generally rise. Conversely, during periods of rising interest rates, the values of such securities generally decline. Changes by recognized rating agencies in the ratings of any fixed income security and in the ability of an issuer to make payments of interest and principal may also affect the value of these investments.
In the normal course of business, the Funds enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Funds and, therefore, cannot be established; however, based on experience, the risk of loss from such claims is considered remote.
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
55
Bishop Street Funds |
Dividend Value Fund invests solely in equity securities. Purchases of equity securities are subject to the risk that stock prices will fall over short or extended periods of time. Historically, the equity markets have moved in cycles, and the value of the Fund’s equity securities may fluctuate drastically from day to day. Individual companies may report poor results or be negatively affected by industry and/or economic trends and developments. The prices of securities issued by such companies may suffer a decline in response. These factors contribute to price volatility, which is the principal risk of investing in the Fund.
9. | LINE OF CREDIT |
Through December 31, 2018, the Funds, which are not jointly liable, had entered into an agreement which enabled them to participate in a $5 million unsecured committed revolving line of credit on a first come, first served basis, with MUFG Union Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”). The proceeds from the borrowings were used to finance the Funds’ short term general working capital requirements, including the funding of shareholder redemptions.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Funds had the following borrowings under the line of credit:
Fund | Daily Average Borrowings | Borrowing Costs | Number of Days Outstanding | Weighted Average Interest Rate | ||||||||||||
Dividend Value Fund | Less than $ | 1 | Less than $ | 1 | 1 | 4.75 | % | |||||||||
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund | Less than $ | 1 | Less than $ | 1 | 3 | 4.75 | % |
10. | OTHER |
At December 31, 2018, the percentage of total shares outstanding held by shareholders owning 10% or greater of total shares outstanding of each Fund, which comprised omnibus accounts that were held on behalf of several individual shareholders, was as follows:
Number of Shareholders | % of Outstanding Shares | |||||||
Dividend Value Fund, Class I Shares | 2 | 99.20 | ||||||
High Grade Income Fund, Class I Shares* | 2 | 90.26 | ||||||
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund, Class I Shares | 1 | 79.08 | ||||||
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund, Class A Shares | — | — |
* | Includes one unaffiliated shareholder, all other shareholders in the above table are affiliated. |
Bishop Street Funds |
56
11. | REGULATORY MATTERS |
On August 17, 2018, the SEC adopted amendments to RegulationS-X. These changes are effective for periods after November 5, 2018. The updates to registered investment companies were mainly focused on the presentation of distributable earnings, eliminating the need to present the components of distributable earnings on a book basis in the financial statements. The update also impacted the presentation of undistributed net investment income and distribution to shareholders on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets. The amounts presented in the current Statement of Changes in Net Assets represent the aggregated total distributions of net investment income and realized capital gains, except for distributions classified as return of capital which are still presented separately. The disaggregated amounts from the prior fiscal year are broken out below if there were both distributions from net investment income and realized capital gains. Otherwise, the amount on the current Statement of Changes for the prior fiscal year end represents distributions of net investment income:
Dividend Value Fund | High Grade Income Fund | Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund | ||||||||||
Net Investment Income: | ||||||||||||
Class I Shares | $ | (646 | ) | $ | (1,292 | ) | $ | (2,830 | ) | |||
Class A Shares | — | — | (448 | ) | ||||||||
Capital Gains: | ||||||||||||
Class I Shares | (3,422 | ) | (681 | ) | (69 | ) | ||||||
Class A Shares | — | — | (12 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Distributions | $ | (4,068 | ) | $ | (1,973 | ) | $ | (3,359 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. | NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS |
In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an Accounting Standards Update, ASU2017-08, Receivables — Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic310-20), Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities (the “ASU”) which amends the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium, shortening such period to the earliest call date. The ASU does not require any accounting change for debt securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of these changes on the financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820). The new guidance includes additions and modifications to disclosures requirements for fair value measurements. For public entities, the
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
57
Bishop Street Funds |
amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. At this time, management is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the financial statements and disclosures.
13. | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
The Funds have evaluated the need for additional disclosures and/or adjustments resulting from subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, no additional disclosures and/or adjustments were required to the financial statements.
Bishop Street Funds |
58
Bishop Street Funds |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Trustees of Bishop Street Funds and Shareholders of Dividend Value Fund, High Grade Income Fund, and Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund
Opinions on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the schedules of investments, of Dividend Value Fund, High Grade Income Fund, and Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund (constituting Bishop Street Funds, hereafter collectively referred to as the “Funds”) as of December 31, 2018, the related statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2018, including the related notes, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2018 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of each of the Funds as of December 31, 2018, the results of each of their operations for the year then ended, the changes in each of their net assets for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2018 and each of the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinions
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Funds’ financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Funds in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2018 by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agent and brokers; when replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 28, 2019
We have served as the auditor of one or more investment companies in Bishop Street Capital Management since 1998.
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
59
Bishop Street Funds |
Disclosure of Fund Expenses
All mutual funds have operating expenses. As a shareholder of a mutual fund you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including applicable sales charges (loads); and (2) ongoing costs, which include (among others) costs for portfolio management, administrative services, distribution and service(12b-1), shareholder service fees, and shareholder reports like this one. It is important for you to understand the impact of these costs on your investment returns.
Operating expenses such as these are deducted from a mutual fund’s gross income and directly reduce its final investment return. These expenses are expressed as a percentage of the mutual fund’s average net assets; this percentage is known as the mutual fund’s expense ratio.
The following examples use the expense ratio and are intended to help you understand the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and to compare these costs with those of other mutual funds. The examples are based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period shown and held for the entire period from July 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018.
The table on the next page illustrates your Fund’s costs in two ways:
• | Actual Fund Return. This section helps you to estimate the actual expenses after fee waivers that your Fund incurred over the period. The “Expenses Paid During Period” column shows the actual dollar expense cost incurred by a $1,000 investment in the Fund, and the “Ending Account Value” number is derived from deducting that expense cost from the Fund’s gross investment return. |
You can use this information, together with the actual amount you invested in the Fund, to estimate the expenses you paid over that period. Simply divide your actual account value by $1,000 to arrive at a ratio (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply that ratio by the number shown for your Fund under “Expenses Paid During Period.”
• | Hypothetical 5% Return. This section helps you compare your Fund’s costs with those of other mutual funds. It assumes that the Fund had an annual 5% return before expenses during the year, but that the expense ratio (Column 3) for the period is unchanged. This example is useful in making comparisons because the Securities and Exchange Commission requires all mutual funds to make this 5% calculation. You can assess your Fund’s comparative cost by comparing the hypothetical result for your Fund in the “Expenses Paid During Period” column with those that appear in the same charts in the shareholder reports for other funds. |
Note: Because the return is set at 5% for comparison purposes — NOT your Fund’s actual return — the account values shown may not apply to your specific investment.
Bishop Street Funds |
60
(Unaudited) |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/18 | Ending Account Value 12/31/18 | Annualized Expense Ratios | Expenses Paid During Period* | |||||||||||||
Dividend Value Fund — Class I |
| |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Actual Fund Return | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 966.00 | 1.05 | % | $ | 5.20 | ||||||||
Hypothetical 5% Return | 1,000.00 | 1,019.91 | 1.05 | 5.35 | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
High Grade Income Fund — Class I |
| |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Actual Fund Return | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,011.90 | 0.76 | % | $ | 3.86 | ||||||||
Hypothetical 5% Return | 1,000.00 | 1,021.37 | 0.76 | 3.88 | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund — Class I |
| |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Actual Fund Return | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,012.60 | 0.55 | % | $ | 2.79 | ||||||||
Hypothetical 5% Return | 1,000.00 | 1,022.43 | 0.55 | 2.80 | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund — Class A |
| |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Actual Fund Return | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,010.00 | 0.80 | % | $ | 4.05 | ||||||||
Hypothetical 5% Return | 1,000.00 | 1,021.17 | 0.80 | 4.08 | ||||||||||||
|
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect theone-half year period). |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
61
Bishop Street Funds |
Notice to Shareholders of Bishop Street Funds
For shareholders that do not have a December 31, 2018 taxable year end, this notice is for informational purposes only. For shareholders with a December 31, 2018 tax year end, please consult your tax adviser as to the pertinence of this notice.
Fund | (A)* Long Term Capital Gains Distributions (Tax Basis) | (B)* Ordinary Income Distributions (Tax Basis) | (C)* Tax Exempt Interest | (A+B+C) (D) Total Distributions (Tax Basis) | ||||||||||||
Dividend Value Fund | 86.15 | % | 13.85 | % | 0.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
High Grade Income Fund | 2.60 | % | 97.40 | % | 0.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund(6) | 0.34 | % | 0.40 | % | 99.26 | % | 100.00 | % |
* | Items (A), (B) and (C) are based on the percentage of each fund’s total distribution. |
(1) | Qualifying dividends represent dividends which qualify for the corporate dividends received deduction and is reflected as a percentage of ordinary income distributions (the total of short-term capital gain and net investment income distributions). |
(2) | The percentage in this column represents the amount of “Qualifying Dividend Income” as created by the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 and is reflected as a percentage of “Ordinary Income Distributions” (the total of short term capital gain and net investment income distributions). It is the intention of the Fund to designate the maximum amount permitted by the law. |
(3) | “U.S. Government Interest” represents the amount of interest that was derived from direct U.S. Government Obligations and distributed during the fiscal year. This amount is reflected as a percentage of total ordinary income distributions (the total of short term capital gain and net investment income distributions). Generally, interest from direct U.S. Government Obligations is exempt from state income tax. However, for residents of California, Connecticut and New York, the statutory threshold requirements were not satisfied to permit exemption of these amounts from state income. |
Bishop Street Funds |
62
(Unaudited) |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, each fund has designated the following items with regard to distributions paid during the year.
Qualifying for Corporate Dividends Receivable Deduction(1) | Qualifying Dividend Income(2) | U.S. Government Interest(3) | Interest Related Dividends(4) | Short-Term Capital Gain Dividends(5) | ||||||||||||||
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 100.00 | % | |||||||||
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 19.31 | % | 98.03 | % | 100.00 | % | |||||||||
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % |
(4) | The percentage in this column represents the amount of “Interest Related Dividends” as created by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and is reflected as a percentage of net investment income distributions that is exempt from U.S. withholding tax when paid to foreign investors. |
(5) | The percentage in this column represents the amount of “Short-Term Capital Gain Dividends” as created by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and is reflected as a percentage of short-term capital gain distributions that is exempt from U.S. withholding tax when paid to foreign investors. |
(6) | For California income tax purposes, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, the Hawaii Municipal Bond Fund designated 4.19% of their distributions paid from net investment income as exempt interest dividends under Section 17145 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
63
Bishop Street Funds |
Board of Trustees and Officers
Set forth below are the names, years of birth, position with the Trust and length of time served, and the principal occupations and other directorships held during at least the last five years of each of the persons currently serving as a Trustee. Trustees who are deemed not to be “interested persons” of the Trust are referred to as “Independent Board Members.” Messrs. Nesher and Klauder are Trustees who may be deemed to be “interested” persons of the
Name and Year of Birth | Position with Trust and Length of Time Served1 | Principal Occupations in the Past 5 Years | ||
INTERESTED TRUSTEES3,4 | ||||
ROBERT NESHER (Born: 1946) | Chairman of the Board of Trustees (Since 1998) | SEI employee 1974 to present; currently performs various services on behalf of SEI Investments for which Mr. Nesher is compensated. Vice Chairman of The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund III, Gallery Trust, Schroder Series Trust and Schroder Global Series Trust. President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee of SEI Daily Income Trust, SEI Tax Exempt Trust, SEI Institutional Managed Trust, SEI Institutional International Trust, SEI Institutional Investments Trust, SEI Asset Allocation Trust, Adviser Managed Trust, New Covenant Funds, SEI Insurance Products Trust and SEI Catholic Values Trust. President and Director of SEI Structured Credit Fund, LP. President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of SEI Alpha Strategy Portfolios, LP, 2007 to 2013. President and Director of SEI Opportunity Fund, L.P. to 2010. Vice Chairman of O’Connor EQUUS(closed-end investment company) to 2016. President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee of SEI Liquid Asset Trust to 2016. Vice Chairman of Winton Series Trust to 2017. Vice Chairman of Winton Diversified Opportunities Fund(closed-end investment company) to 2018. | ||
N. JEFFREY KLAUDER (Born: 1952) | Trustee (Since 2018) | Executive Vice President and General Counsel of SEI Investments since 2004. | ||
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES4 | ||||
JOSEPH T. GRAUSE, JR. (Born: 1952) | Trustee (Since 2011) | Self-Employed Consultant since 2012. Director of Endowments and Foundations, Morningstar Investment Management, Morningstar, Inc., 2010 to 2011. Director of International Consulting and Chief Executive Officer of Morningstar Associates Europe Limited, Morningstar, Inc., 2007 to 2010. Country Manager — Morningstar UK Limited, Morningstar, Inc., 2005 to 2007. |
1 | Each Trustee shall hold office during the lifetime of this trust until the election and qualification of his or her successor, or until he or she sooner dies, resigns, or is removed in accordance with the Trust’s Declaration of Trust. |
2 | Directorships of Companies required to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i.e. “public companies”) or other investment companies under the 1940 Act. |
3 | Denotes Trustees who may be deemed to be “interested” persons of the Fund as that term is defined in the 1940 Act by virtue of their affiliation with the Distributor and/or its affiliates |
4 | Trustees oversee 3 funds in the Bishop Street Funds. |
Bishop Street Funds |
64
(Unaudited) |
Trust as that term is defined in the 1940 Act by virtue of their affiliation with the Trust’s Distributor. The Trust’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) includes additional information about the Trustees and Officers. The SAI may be obtained without charge by calling1-800-262-9565. The following chart lists Trustees and Officers as of December 31, 2018.
Other Directorships Held in the Past 5 Years2 |
Current Directorships: Trustee of The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund II, Bishop Street Funds, The KP Funds, SEI Daily Income Trust, SEI Institutional International Trust, SEI Institutional Investments Trust, SEI Institutional Managed Trust, SEI Asset Allocation Trust, SEI Tax Exempt Trust, Adviser Managed Trust, New Covenant Funds, SEI Insurance Products Trust and SEI Catholic Values Trust. Director of SEI Structured Credit Fund, LP, SEI Global Master Fund plc, SEI Global Assets Fund plc, SEI Global Investments Fund plc, SEI Investments — Global Funds Services, Limited, SEI Investments Global, Limited, SEI Investments (Europe) Ltd., SEI Investments — Unit Trust Management (UK) Limited, SEI Multi-Strategy Funds PLC and SEI Global Nominee Ltd.
Former Directorships: Director of SEI Opportunity Fund, L.P. to 2010. Director of SEI Alpha Strategy Portfolios, LP to 2013. Trustee of SEI Liquid Asset Trust to 2016. |
Current Directorships: Trustee of The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund II, Bishop Street Funds and The KP Funds. Director of SEI Private Trust Company; SEI Investments Management Corporation; SEI Trust Company; SEI Investments (South Africa), Limited; SEI Investments (Canada) Company; SEI Global Fund Services Ltd.; SEI Investments Global Limited; SEI Global Master Fund; SEI Global Investments Fund; and SEI Global Assets Fund. |
Current Directorships: Trustee of The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund II, Bishop Street Funds and The KP Funds. Director of The Korea Fund, Inc. |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
65
Bishop Street Funds |
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) Held and Length of Time Served1 | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years | ||
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES3 (continued) | ||||
MITCHELL A. JOHNSON (Born: 1942) | Trustee (Since 2006) | Retired. Private Investor since 1994. | ||
BETTY L. KRIKORIAN (Born: 1943) | Trustee (Since 2006) | Vice President, Compliance, AARP Financial Inc., from 2008 to 2010. Self-Employed Legal and Financial Services Consultant since 2003. Counsel(in-house) for State Street Bank from 1995 to 2003. | ||
BRUCE R. SPECA (Born: 1956) | Trustee (Since 2011) | Global Head of Asset Allocation, Manulife Asset Management (subsidiary of Manulife Financial), 2010 to 2011. Executive Vice President — Investment Management Services, John Hancock Financial Services (subsidiary of Manulife Financial), 2003 to 2010. | ||
GEORGE J. SULLIVAN, JR. (Born: 1942) | Retired since 2012.Self-Employed Consultant, Newfound Consultants Inc., 1997 to 2011. | Retired since 2012. Self-Employed Consultant, Newfound Consultants Inc., 1997 to 2011. |
1 | Each Trustee shall hold office during the lifetime of this trust until the election and qualification of his or her successor, or until he or she sooner dies, resigns, or is removed in accordance with the Trust’s Declaration of Trust. |
2 | Directorships of Companies required to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i.e. “public companies”) or other investment companies under the 1940 Act. |
3 | Trustees oversee 3 funds in the Bishop Street Funds. |
Bishop Street Funds |
66
(Unaudited) |
Other Directorships Held in the Past 5 Years2 |
Current Directorships: Trustee of The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund II, Bishop Street Funds, The KP Funds, SEI Asset Allocation Trust, SEI Daily Income Trust, SEI Institutional International Trust, SEI Institutional Managed Trust, SEI Institutional Investments Trust, SEI Tax Exempt Trust, Adviser Managed Trust, New Covenant Funds, SEI Insurance Products Trust and SEI Catholic Values Trust. Director of Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (Farmer Mac) since 1997.
Former Directorships: Director of SEI Alpha Strategy Portfolios, LP to 2013. Trustee of SEI Liquid Asset Trust to 2016 |
Current Directorships: Trustee of The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund II, Bishop Street Funds and The KP Funds. |
Current Directorships: Trustee of The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund II, Bishop Street Funds and The KP Funds. Director of Stone Harbor Investments Funds, Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund(closed-end fund) and Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Total Income Fund(closed-end fund). |
Current Directorships: Trustee/Director of The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund II, Bishop Street Funds, The KP Funds, SEI Structured Credit Fund, LP, SEI Daily Income Trust, SEI Institutional International Trust, SEI Institutional Investments Trust, SEI Institutional Managed Trust, SEI Asset Allocation Trust, SEI Tax Exempt Trust, Adviser Managed Trust, New Covenant Funds, SEI Insurance Products Trust and SEI Catholic Values Trust.
Former Directorships: Director of SEI Opportunity Fund, L.P. to 2010. Director of SEI Alpha Strategy Portfolios, LP to 2013. Trustee of SEI Liquid Asset Trust to 2016. Trustee/ Director of State Street Navigator Securities Lending Trust to 2017. Member of the independent review committee for SEI’s Canadian-registered mutual funds to 2017. |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
67
Bishop Street Funds |
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) Held with the Trust and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years | ||
OFFICERS | ||||
MICHAEL BEATTIE (Born: 1965) | President (Since 2011) | Director of Client Service, SEI Investments, since 2004. | ||
JOHN BOURGEOIS (Born: 1973) | Assistant Treasurer (since 2017) | Fund Accounting Manager, SEI Investments, since 2000. | ||
STEPHEN CONNORS (Born: 1984) | Treasurer, Controller and Chief Financial Officer (since 2015) | Director, SEI Investments, Fund Accounting since 2014. Audit Manager, Deloitte & Touche LLP, from 2011 to 2014. | ||
DIANNE M. DESCOTEAUX (Born: 1977) | Vice President and Secretary (Since 2011) | Counsel at SEI Investments since 2010. Associate at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, from 2006 to 2010. | ||
RUSSELL EMERY (Born: 1962) | Chief Compliance Officer (since 2006) | Chief Compliance Officer of SEI Structured Credit Fund, LP since 2007. Chief Compliance Officer of SEI Alpha Strategy Portfolios, LP from 2007 to 2013. Chief Compliance Officer of The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund II, Bishop Street Funds, The KP Funds, The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund III, Gallery Trust, Schroder Series Trust, Schroder Global Series Trust, SEI Institutional Managed Trust, SEI Asset Allocation Trust, SEI Institutional International Trust, SEI Institutional Investments Trust, SEI Daily Income Trust, SEI Tax Exempt Trust, Adviser Managed Trust, New Covenant Funds, SEI Insurance Products Trust and SEI Catholic Values Trust. Chief Compliance Officer of SEI Opportunity Fund, L.P. to 2010. Chief Compliance Officer of O’Connor EQUUS(closed-end investment company) to 2016. Chief Compliance Officer of SEI Liquid Asset Trust to 2016. Chief Compliance Officer of Winton Series Trust to 2017. Chief Compliance Officer of Winton Diversified Opportunities Fund(closed-end investment company) to 2018. |
Bishop Street Funds |
68
(Unaudited) |
Other Directorships Held in the Past 5 Years |
None. |
None. |
None. |
None. |
None. |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
69
Bishop Street Funds |
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) Held and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years | ||
OFFICERS (continued) | ||||
ROBERT MORROW (Born: 1968) | Vice President (since 2017) | Account Manager, SEI Investments, since 2007. | ||
BRIDGET E. SUDALL (Born: 1980) | Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer and Privacy Officer (since 2015) | Senior Associate and AML Officer, Morgan Stanley Alternative Investment Partners, from 2011 to 2015. Investor Services Team Lead, Morgan Stanley Alternative Investment Partners, from 2007 to 2011. | ||
JAMES BERNSTEIN (Born: 1962) | Vice President and Assistant Secretary (since 2017) | Attorney, SEI Investments, since 2017. Prior Positions: Self-employed consultant, 2017. Associate General Counsel & Vice President, Nationwide Funds Group and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, from 2002 to 2016. Assistant General Counsel & Vice President, Market Street Funds and Provident Mutual Insurance Company, from 1999 to 2002. | ||
MATTHEW M. MAHER (Born: 1975) | Vice President and Assistant Secretary (since 2018) | Counsel at SEI Investments since 2018. Attorney, Blank Rome LLP, from 2015 to 2018. Assistant Counsel & Vice President, Bank of New York Mellon, from 2013 to 2014. Attorney, Dilworth Paxson LLP, from 2006 to 2013. |
Bishop Street Funds |
70
(Unaudited) |
Other Directorships Held in the Past 5 Years |
None. |
None. |
None. |
None. |
December 31, 2018 | www.bishopstreetfunds.com |
71
INVESTMENT ADVISER
BISHOP STREET CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
HONOLULU, HI 96813
ADMINISTRATOR
SEI INVESTMENTS GLOBAL FUNDS SERVICES
ONE FREEDOM VALLEY DRIVE
OAKS, PA 19456
DISTRIBUTOR
SEI INVESTMENTS DISTRIBUTION CO.
ONE FREEDOM VALLEY DRIVE
OAKS, PA 19456
TRANSFER AGENT
DST SYSTEMS, INC.
KANSAS CITY, MO 64121
CUSTODIAN
MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94101
LEGAL COUNSEL
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
FORMOREINFORMATIONABOUT BISHOP STREET FUNDS,CALL1-800-262-9565
ORYOUR INVESTMENT SPECIALIST
VISITUSONLINEATWWW.BISHOPSTREETFUNDS.COM
![]() | BISHOP STREET FUNDS P.O. BOX 219721 KANSAS CITY, MO 64121-9721 |
THISREPORTANDTHEFINANCIALSTATEMENTSCONTAINEDHEREINARESUBMITTEDFORTHEGENERALINFORMATIONOF BISHOP STREET FUNDS’SHAREHOLDERS. THISREPORTISNOTAUTHORIZEDFORDISTRIBUTIONTOPROSPECTIVEINVESTORSUNLESSPRECEDEDORACCOMPANIEDBYANEFFECTIVEPROSPECTUS.
SHARESOF BISHOP STREET FUNDSARE NOTDEPOSITSOROBLIGATIONSOF,ORGUARANTEEDBY FIRST HAWAIIAN BANKORANYOFITSAFFILIATES. SUCHSHARESAREALSO NOTFEDERALLYINSUREDBYTHE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD,ORANYOTHERAGENCY. INVESTMENTINSHARESOFMUTUALFUNDSINVOLVESRISK,INCLUDINGTHEPOSSIBLELOSSOFPRINCIPAL. THE BISHOP STREET FUNDSAREDISTRIBUTEDBY SEI INVESTMENTS DISTRIBUTION CO.,WHICHIS NOTAFFILIATEDWITH FIRST HAWAIIAN BANK, BANKOFTHE WESTOR BANCWEST CORPORATION. BANCWEST CORPORATIONISAWHOLLY-OWNEDSUBSIDIARYOF BNP PARIBAS.
BSF-AR-006-2400
Item 2. | Code of Ethics. |
The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller or principal accounting officer, and any person who performs a similar function. There have been no amendments to or waivers granted to this code of ethics during the past fiscal year.
Item 3. | Audit Committee Financial Expert. |
(a)(1) The registrant’s board of trustees has determined that the registrant has at least one audit committee financial expert serving on the audit committee.
(a) (2) The audit committee financial expert is George Sullivan, and is independent as defined in FormN-CSR Item 3 (a) (2).
Item 4. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services. |
Fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC LLP) Related to the Trust
PwC LLP billed the Trust aggregate fees for services rendered to the Trust for the last two fiscal years as follows:
2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||
All fees and that were | All fees and that were | All other fees and pre-approval | All fees and that were | All fees and that were | All other fees pre-approval | |||||||||
(a) | Audit Fees(1) | $80,500 | N/A | N/A | $78,200 | N/A | N/A | |||||||
(b) | Audit-Related Fees | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||
(c) | Tax Fees | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||
(d) | All Other Fees | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Notes:
(1) | Audit fees include amounts related to the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. |
(e)(1) The Trust’s Audit Committee has adopted and the Board of Trustees has ratified an Audit andNon-Audit ServicesPre-Approval Policy (the “Policy”), which sets forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which services proposed to be performed by the independent auditor of the Funds may bepre-approved.
The Policy provides that all requests or applications for proposed services to be provided by the independent auditor must be submitted to the Registrant’s Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and must include a detailed description of the services proposed to be rendered. The CFO will determine whether such services:
(1) require specificpre-approval; (2) are included within the list of services that have received the generalpre-approval of the Audit Committee pursuant to the Policy; or (3) have been previouslypre-approved in connection with the independent auditor’s annual engagement letter for the applicable year or otherwise. In any instance where services requirepre-approval, the Audit Committee will consider whether such services are consistent with SEC’s rules and whether the provision of such services would impair the auditor’s independence.
Requests or applications to provide services that require specificpre-approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Audit Committee by the CFO. The Audit Committee will be informed by the CFO on a quarterly basis of all services rendered by the independent auditor. The Audit Committee has delegated specificpre-approval authority to either the Audit Committee Chair or financial expert, provided that the estimated fee for any such proposedpre-approved service does not exceed $100,000 and anypre-approval decisions are reported to the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
Services that have received the generalpre-approval of the Audit Committee are identified and described in the Policy. In addition, the Policy sets forth a maximum fee per engagement with respect to each identified service that has received generalpre-approval.
All services to be provided by the independent auditor shall be provided pursuant to a signed written engagement letter with the Registrant, the investment advisor or applicable control affiliate (except that matters as to which an engagement letter would be impractical because of timing issues or because the matter is small may not be the subject of an engagement letter) that sets forth both the services to be provided by the independent auditor and the total fees to be paid to the independent auditor for those services.
In addition, the Audit Committee has determined to take additional measures on an annual basis to meet its responsibility to oversee the work of the independent auditor and to assure the auditor’s independence from the Registrant, such as reviewing a formal written statement from the independent auditor delineating all relationships between the independent auditor and the Registrant, and discussing with the independent auditor its methods and procedures for ensuring independence.
(e)(2) Percentage of fees billed applicable tonon-audit services approved pursuant to the “de minimis” exception of Rule2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) were as follows:
2018 | 2017 | |||
Audit-Related Fees | N/A | N/A |
Tax Fees | N/A | N/A | ||
All Other Fees | N/A | N/A |
(f) Not applicable.
(g) The aggregatenon-audit fees and services billed by PwC for services rendered to the Registrant, and rendered to the Registrant’s investment adviser (not including anysub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant for the last two fiscal years were $0 and $0 for 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(h) During the past fiscal year, allnon-audit services provided by Registrant’s principal accountant to either Registrant’s investment adviser or to any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with Registrant’s investment adviser that provides ongoing services to Registrant werepre-approved by the audit committee of Registrant’s Board of Trustees. Included in the audit committee’spre-approval was the review and consideration as to whether the provision of thesenon-audit services is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
Item 5. | Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. |
Not applicable toopen-end management investment companies.
Item 6. | Schedule of Investments |
Schedule of Investments is included as part of the Report to Shareholders filed
under Item 1 of this form.
Item 7. | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures forClosed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not applicable toopen-end management investment companies.
Item 8. | Portfolio Managers ofClosed-End Management Investment Companies |
Not applicable. Effective forclosed-end management investment companies for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2005.
Item 9. | Purchases of Equity Securities byClosed-End Management Company and Affiliated Purchasers. |
Not applicable toopen-end management investment companies.
Item 10. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
Not applicable.
Item 11. | Controls and Procedures. |
(a) The Registrant’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions have concluded that the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule30a-3(c) under the Act (17 CFR270.30a-3(c)) as of a date within 90 days of the
filing date of the report, are effective based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule30a-3(b) under the Act (17 CFR270.30a-3(b)) and Rules13a-15(b) or15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR270.30a-15(b)) or240.15d-15(b)).
(b) There has been no change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule30a-3(d) under the Act (17CFR270.3a-3(d)) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Items 12. | Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities forClosed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not applicable.
Items 13. | Exhibits. |
(a)(1) Code of Ethics attached hereto.
(a)(2) A separate certification for the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (17 CFR270.30a-2(a)), is filed herewith.
(b) Officer certifications as required by Rule30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (17 CFR270.30a-2(b)) also accompany this filing as an exhibit.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) | Bishop Street Funds | |||||||
By | (Signature and Title)* | /s/ Michael Beattie | ||||||
Michael Beattie, President |
Dated: March 11, 2019
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By | (Signature and Title)* | /s/ Michael Beattie | ||||||
Michael Beattie, President |
Dated: March 11, 2019
By | (Signature and Title)* | /s/ Stephen Connors | ||||||
Stephen Connors, Treasurer, Controller & CFO |
Dated: March 11, 2019
* | Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature. |