UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
Certified Shareholder Report of
Registered Management Investment Companies
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-08576
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (213) 486-9200
Date of fiscal year end: July 31
Date of reporting period: July 31, 2012
Courtney R. Taylor
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
Copies to:
Michael Glazer
Bingham McCutchen LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 4400
Los Angeles, California 90071
(Counsel for the Registrant)
ITEM 1 – Reports to Stockholders
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund®
[photo of the underside of a highway overpass under construction]
Special feature
Shining a light: investing in today’s municipal bond market
u See page 6
Annual report for the year ended July 31, 2012
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund seeks to provide a high level of current income exempt from regular federal income tax.
This fund is one of more than 40 offered by American Funds, which is one of the nation’s largest mutual fund families. For more than 80 years, Capital Research and Management Company,SM the American Funds adviser, has invested with a long-term focus based on thorough research and attention to risk.
Fund results shown in this report, unless otherwise indicated, are for Class A shares at net asset value. If a sales charge (maximum 3.75%) had been deducted, the results would have been lower. Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. Investing for short periods makes losses more likely. Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Here are the average annual total returns on a $1,000 investment with all distributions reinvested for periods ended June 30, 2012 (the most recent calendar quarter-end): | ||||||||||||
Class A shares | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | |||||||||
Reflecting 3.75% maximum sales charge | 9.93 | % | 3.29 | % | 4.22 | % |
The total annual fund operating expense ratio is 0.68% for Class A shares as of the prospectus dated October 1, 2012 (unaudited).
Investment results assume all distributions are reinvested and reflect applicable fees and expenses. When applicable, investment results reflect fee waivers, without which results would have been lower. Visit americanfunds.com for more information.
The fund’s 30-day yield for Class A shares as of August 31, 2012, calculated in accordance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) formula, was 3.18%. (For investors in the 35% tax bracket, this is equivalent to a taxable yield of 4.89%.) The fund’s distribution rate for Class A shares as of that date was 4.17%. Both reflect the 3.75% maximum sales charge. The SEC yield reflects the rate at which the fund is earning income on its current portfolio of securities while the distribution rate reflects the fund’s past dividends paid to shareholders. Accordingly, the fund’s SEC yield and distribution rate may differ.
Results for other share classes can be found on page 4.
The return of principal for bond funds and for funds with significant underlying bond holdings is not guaranteed. Fund shares are subject to the same interest rate, inflation and credit risks associated with the underlying bond holdings. Bond ratings, which typically range from Aaa/AAA (highest) to D (lowest), are assigned by credit rating agencies such as Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s and/or Fitch as an indication of an issuer’s creditworthiness. High-yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal than investment-grade bonds. Income may be subject to state or local income taxes and/or federal alternative minimum taxes. Certain other income, as well as capital gain distributions, may be taxable. Refer to the fund prospectus and the Risk Factors section of this report for more information on these and other risks associated with investing in the fund.
Fellow investors:
During American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund’s most recent fiscal year, total returns for municipal bonds were exceptional. Investors who reinvested monthly dividends totaling 66 cents a share realized a total return of 14.98% for the 12 months ended July 31, 2012. Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond Index (a proxy for the high-yield municipal market) returned 14.99%, and Barclays Municipal Bond Index (a proxy for the broader investment-grade municipal market) returned 10.51%. The market indexes are unmanaged and their results do not include expenses. Meanwhile, the fund’s peer group, as measured by the Lipper High Yield Municipal Debt Funds Average, posted a 14.88% return.
Over the period, the fund’s share price increased from $13.78 to $15.13. Those investors who took dividends in cash realized an income return of 4.82%. The average annual returns achieved over periods of five years and longer (shown in the table on page 2) underscore just how unusual the 12-month result was. While we are very pleased by this most recent outcome, it should be remembered that the fund’s investment horizon is longer term, targeting municipal bonds that offer the potential for consistent relatively high total returns over several years. The fund has a proven track record of producing total returns that compare favorably with those of its peer group over longer time frames.
Municipal market overview
Concerns about the financial woes of some state and local governments that had roiled bond markets in early 2011 began to recede in the months leading up to the fund’s fiscal-year start on August 1, 2011. Yields (which move inversely to prices) among municipal bonds declined for much of the subsequent 12 months, helping them to become one of the highest returning bond sectors over the period.
In stark contrast to the controversial “doomsday” predictions of a few high-profile market commentators, defaults were consistent with historical trends. The market’s breadth and depth meant that recent municipal defaults and bankruptcies did not have a significant impact. To learn more about the market and the unique investment challenges and opportunities it presents, we invite you to read the feature article, “Shining a light: investing in today’s municipal bond market,” beginning on page 6.
Against a backdrop of worries about sluggish economic growth and the European sovereign debt crisis, investors appeared to view municipal bonds as a relatively safe haven, as well as a source of yield. Most weeks, municipal bond mutual funds experienced net inflows of investor money.
[photo of the underside of a highway overpass under construction]
[Begin Sidebar]
[Begin Sidebar]
In this report | |
Special feature | |
6 | Shining a light: investing in today’s municipal bond market |
Media coverage of municipal bonds often centers on the fiscal woes of some local and state governments, but there’s a lot more to this vast and complex market. Here, we survey the market and talk to some of the fund’s investment professionals. Despite the challenging investment environment, they are continuing to find attractive opportunities among higher yielding bonds. | |
Contents | |
1 | Letter to investors |
5 | The value of a long-term perspective |
12 | Summary investment portfolio |
17 | Financial statements |
31 | Board of trustees and other officers |
[End Sidebar]
[photo of a highway overpass under construction]
Meanwhile, much of the recent municipal bond issuance was actually refinancing, which didn’t add to the net supply of bonds. Combined with increased demand, the relative scarcity of municipal bonds — particularly in terms of higher yielding issuance — helped support prices. Returns for below investment-grade bonds (rated Ba/BB and below) generally led those of their investment-grade counterparts, and returns for revenue bonds (the vast majority of the fund’s investments) eclipsed those of general obligation (G.O.) bonds.
Revenue bonds are typically backed by dedicated income streams, such as charges for airport gate rentals, tolls on roads or hospital revenues. The viability of the projects being financed by revenue bonds and — by consequence — the financial outcome for investors in these bonds, has little to do with the budget challenges of state and local governments. Strong returns were evident across all major sectors. Total returns for longer term bonds — which account for most of the fund’s investments — significantly led those of shorter maturities.
Inside the portfolio
As of July 31, 2012, some of the fund’s larger investments were among revenue bonds supporting critical local enterprises including hospitals (15.0%) and continuing care retirement communities (13.0%). These were complemented by significant holdings in other sectors that might be less familiar to some of the fund’s investors — for instance, tax-assessment bonds that are typically issued to fund public infrastructure for real estate development, airport bonds and airline bonds. We believe that our investments in revenue bonds demonstrate the value of fundamental credit research — something that the fund’s investment professionals have much experience in.
[Begin Sidebar]
Results at a glance | ||||||||||||||||
For periods ended July 31, 2012, with all distributions reinvested | ||||||||||||||||
Total returns | Average annual total returns | |||||||||||||||
1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Lifetime | |||||||||||||
(since 9/26/94) | ||||||||||||||||
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund | ||||||||||||||||
(Class A shares) | 14.98 | % | 4.47 | % | 4.74 | % | 5.76 | % | ||||||||
Barclays Municipal Bond Index* | 10.51 | 6.12 | 5.31 | 6.09 | ||||||||||||
Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond Index* | 14.99 | 4.11 | 6.36 | — | † | |||||||||||
Lipper High Yield Municipal | ||||||||||||||||
Debt Funds Average | 14.88 | 3.54 | 4.69 | 5.33 | ||||||||||||
*These indexes are unmanaged and, therefore, have no expenses. | ||||||||||||||||
†This index did not exist prior to September 30, 1995. |
[End Sidebar]
Consistent with the market’s broad rally, positive contributions to the fund’s 12-month result were spread among a variety of sectors, with bonds issued by hospital facilities and continuing care retirement communities leading the pack.
Within several sectors we sought opportunities to invest in higher yielding bonds by selling higher rated bonds and buying lower rated ones that we feel may provide attractive returns, given the risk involved. By way of example, over the fiscal year holdings of bonds rated Baa/BBB (the lowest category of investment-grade ratings) increased from 25.2% to 31.2%.
Looking forward
Many municipalities continue to grapple with severe financial problems. As the federal government’s fiscal stimulus for state and local governments runs its course, these challenges could become more severe and investor sentiment could sour. The direction of tax and fiscal policy following November’s election is uncertain, and investor confidence could be shaken by the possible “fiscal cliff” — lapses in federal tax-relief provisions and tax cuts, as well as deficit-reducing spending cuts — that could occur at the end of 2012 and start of 2013. We remain alert to the possibility of increased duress among municipal credits, and while we believe that the exceptional absolute returns offered by municipal bonds cannot continue indefinitely, we continue to see municipal bonds offering potentially attractive returns for tax-sensitive investors.
As the feature article on page 6 explains, however, the market is large and complex. In our view, it continues to offer attractive potential investment opportunities for experienced, research-driven investors; over the longer term, municipal bonds have also been able to add stability to a broader investment portfolio that includes stocks.
We’re grateful for this chance to discuss the fund and hope it has been insightful for the thousands of new investors who have bolstered our ranks in the last year, as well as longer established ones. Thank you for your continued support. We look forward to reporting to you again in six months.
Cordially,
/s/ Karl J. Zeile
Karl J. Zeile
President
September 13, 2012
For current information about the fund, visit americanfunds.com.
[Begin Sidebar]
Tax-exempt yields vs. taxable yields
Find your estimated 2012 taxable income below to determine your federal tax rate,* then look in the right-hand column to see what you would have had to earn from a taxable investment to equal the fund’s 4.23% tax-exempt distribution rate† as of July 31, 2012. For example, investors in the highest tax bracket (35%) would need a taxable distribution rate of 6.51% to match the fund’s distribution rate.
The fund’s tax-exempt | ||||||||||||||
If your taxable income is … | distribution rate | |||||||||||||
… then your federal | of 4.23% is equivalent | |||||||||||||
Single | Joint | tax rate is … | to a taxable rate of … | |||||||||||
$ | 0 – 8,700 | $ | 0 – 17,400 | 10.0 | % | 4.70 | % | |||||||
8,701 – 35,350 | 17,401 – 70,700 | 15.0 | 4.98 | |||||||||||
35,351 – 85,650 | 70,701 – 142,700 | 25.0 | 5.64 | |||||||||||
85,651 – 178,650 | 142,701 – 217,450 | 28.0 | 5.88 | |||||||||||
178,651 – 388,350 | 217,451 – 388,350 | 33.0 | 6.31 | |||||||||||
Over 388,350 | Over 388,350 | 35.0 | 6.51 |
*Based on 2012 federal tax rates. The federal rates do not include an adjustment for the loss of personal exemptions and the phase-out of itemized deductions that are applicable to certain taxable income levels. |
†The distribution rate is based on dividends paid over the last 12 months divided by the maximum offering price as of July 31, 2012. Capital gain distributions, if any, are added back at the maximum offering price to determine the rate. |
[End Sidebar]
Other share class results
unaudited
Classes B, C and F
Fund results shown are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Average annual total returns for periods ended June 30, 2012 (the most recent calendar quarter-end): | ||||||||||||
10 years/ | ||||||||||||
1 year | 5 years | Life of class1 | ||||||||||
Class B shares2 | ||||||||||||
Reflecting applicable contingent deferred sales charge | ||||||||||||
(CDSC), maximum of 5%, payable only if shares | ||||||||||||
are sold within six years of purchase | 8.35 | % | 2.98 | % | 4.03 | % | ||||||
Not reflecting CDSC | 13.35 | 3.32 | 4.03 | |||||||||
Class C shares | ||||||||||||
Reflecting CDSC, maximum of 1%, payable only | ||||||||||||
if shares are sold within one year of purchase | 12.30 | 3.27 | 3.80 | |||||||||
Not reflecting CDSC | 13.30 | 3.27 | 3.80 | |||||||||
Class F-1 shares3 | ||||||||||||
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged | ||||||||||||
by sponsoring firm | 14.09 | 4.01 | 4.54 | |||||||||
Class F-2 shares3 — first sold 8/12/08 | ||||||||||||
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged | ||||||||||||
by sponsoring firm | 14.41 | — | 6.40 |
1Applicable to Class F-2 shares only. All other share classes reflect 10-year results. |
2These shares are not available for purchase. |
3These shares are sold without any initial or contingent deferred sales charge. |
Investment results assume all distributions are reinvested and reflect applicable fees and expenses. When applicable, investment results reflect fee waivers, without which results would have been lower. Visit americanfunds.com for more information.
For information regarding the differences among the various share classes, refer to the fund prospectus.
The value of a long-term perspective
How a $10,000 investment has grown (for the period September 26, 1994, to July 31, 2012, with dividends reinvested)
There have always been reasons not to invest. If you look beyond the negative headlines, however, you will find that, despite occasional stumbles, financial markets have tended to reward investors over the long term. Active management — bolstered by experience and careful research — can add even more value. As the chart below shows, over its lifetime, American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund has done better than the Lipper High Yield Municipal Debt Funds Average.
Fund results shown are for Class A shares and, unless otherwise indicated, reflect deduction of the maximum sales charge of 3.75% on the $10,000 investment.1 Thus, the net amount invested was $9,625.2 Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
[begin mountain chart]
The fund at net asset value (without any sales charge) | The fund at maximum offering price (with 3.75% sales charge deducted)1 | Barclays Municipal Bond Index3 | Lipper High Yield Municipal Debt Funds Average4 | |||||||||||||
9/26/1994 | 10,000 | 9,623 | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||||||
10/31/1994 | 9,886 | 9,513 | 9,822 | 9,849 | ||||||||||||
1/31/1995 | 10,287 | 9,899 | 10,139 | 10,138 | ||||||||||||
4/30/1995 | 10,760 | 10,354 | 10,566 | 10,542 | ||||||||||||
7/31/1995 | 11,162 | 10,741 | 10,910 | 10,820 | ||||||||||||
10/31/1995 | 11,534 | 11,099 | 11,280 | 11,151 | ||||||||||||
1/31/1996 | 11,904 | 11,455 | 11,665 | 11,540 | ||||||||||||
4/30/1996 | 11,692 | 11,251 | 11,406 | 11,283 | ||||||||||||
7/31/1996 | 12,108 | 11,652 | 11,630 | 11,489 | ||||||||||||
10/31/1996 | 12,452 | 11,983 | 11,923 | 11,784 | ||||||||||||
1/31/1997 | 12,687 | 12,208 | 12,113 | 11,980 | ||||||||||||
4/30/1997 | 12,863 | 12,378 | 12,162 | 12,073 | ||||||||||||
7/31/1997 | 13,484 | 12,975 | 12,822 | 12,660 | ||||||||||||
10/31/1997 | 13,714 | 13,197 | 12,936 | 12,852 | ||||||||||||
1/31/1998 | 14,123 | 13,590 | 13,338 | 13,259 | ||||||||||||
4/30/1998 | 14,181 | 13,646 | 13,293 | 13,279 | ||||||||||||
7/31/1998 | 14,435 | 13,890 | 13,591 | 13,533 | ||||||||||||
10/31/1998 | 14,645 | 14,093 | 13,973 | 13,788 | ||||||||||||
1/31/1999 | 14,758 | 14,201 | 14,224 | 13,972 | ||||||||||||
4/30/1999 | 14,827 | 14,267 | 14,217 | 14,003 | ||||||||||||
7/31/1999 | 14,669 | 14,116 | 13,982 | 13,806 | ||||||||||||
10/31/1999 | 14,375 | 13,833 | 13,725 | 13,418 | ||||||||||||
1/31/2000 | 14,191 | 13,656 | 13,708 | 13,208 | ||||||||||||
4/30/2000 | 14,524 | 13,976 | 14,087 | 13,473 | ||||||||||||
7/31/2000 | 14,905 | 14,343 | 14,585 | 13,757 | ||||||||||||
10/31/2000 | 15,142 | 14,571 | 14,893 | 13,974 | ||||||||||||
1/31/2001 | 15,455 | 14,873 | 15,529 | 14,242 | ||||||||||||
4/30/2001 | 15,730 | 15,137 | 15,548 | 14,332 | ||||||||||||
7/31/2001 | 16,268 | 15,654 | 16,055 | 14,799 | ||||||||||||
10/31/2001 | 16,482 | 15,861 | 16,458 | 15,010 | ||||||||||||
1/31/2002 | 16,439 | 15,819 | 16,445 | 14,952 | ||||||||||||
4/30/2002 | 16,686 | 16,056 | 16,636 | 15,122 | ||||||||||||
7/31/2002 | 17,098 | 16,453 | 17,132 | 15,441 | ||||||||||||
10/31/2002 | 17,124 | 16,479 | 17,424 | 15,334 | ||||||||||||
1/31/2003 | 17,298 | 16,645 | 17,673 | 15,510 | ||||||||||||
4/30/2003 | 17,644 | 16,978 | 18,049 | 15,762 | ||||||||||||
7/31/2003 | 17,621 | 16,956 | 17,749 | 15,858 | ||||||||||||
10/31/2003 | 18,116 | 17,433 | 18,315 | 16,370 | ||||||||||||
1/31/2004 | 18,576 | 17,875 | 18,766 | 16,874 | ||||||||||||
4/30/2004 | 18,556 | 17,857 | 18,532 | 16,789 | ||||||||||||
7/31/2004 | 18,757 | 18,049 | 18,776 | 16,965 | ||||||||||||
10/31/2004 | 19,313 | 18,585 | 19,420 | 17,522 | ||||||||||||
1/31/2005 | 19,598 | 18,859 | 19,677 | 17,991 | ||||||||||||
4/30/2005 | 19,785 | 19,039 | 19,795 | 18,293 | ||||||||||||
7/31/2005 | 20,076 | 19,319 | 19,968 | 18,689 | ||||||||||||
10/31/2005 | 20,114 | 19,356 | 19,912 | 18,653 | ||||||||||||
1/31/2006 | 20,451 | 19,680 | 20,234 | 19,036 | ||||||||||||
4/30/2006 | 20,637 | 19,859 | 20,223 | 19,244 | ||||||||||||
7/31/2006 | 20,968 | 20,178 | 20,477 | 19,585 | ||||||||||||
10/31/2006 | 21,531 | 20,719 | 21,056 | 20,161 | ||||||||||||
1/31/2007 | 21,689 | 20,871 | 21,103 | 20,340 | ||||||||||||
4/30/2007 | 21,968 | 21,140 | 21,391 | 20,601 | ||||||||||||
7/31/2007 | 21,832 | 21,009 | 21,351 | 20,462 | ||||||||||||
10/31/2007 | 21,787 | 20,966 | 21,669 | 20,330 | ||||||||||||
1/31/2008 | 21,746 | 20,926 | 22,144 | 20,173 | ||||||||||||
4/30/2008 | 21,183 | 20,384 | 21,988 | 19,608 | ||||||||||||
7/31/2008 | 20,943 | 20,153 | 21,955 | 19,397 | ||||||||||||
10/31/2008 | 18,553 | 17,853 | 20,954 | 16,834 | ||||||||||||
1/31/2009 | 18,169 | 17,484 | 22,108 | 16,291 | ||||||||||||
4/30/2009 | 18,805 | 18,096 | 22,672 | 17,058 | ||||||||||||
7/31/2009 | 19,751 | 19,006 | 23,077 | 18,067 | ||||||||||||
10/31/2009 | 21,328 | 20,524 | 23,803 | 19,822 | ||||||||||||
1/31/2010 | 21,780 | 20,959 | 24,206 | 20,272 | ||||||||||||
4/30/2010 | 22,367 | 21,524 | 24,679 | 20,902 | ||||||||||||
7/31/2010 | 22,812 | 21,952 | 25,189 | 21,287 | ||||||||||||
10/31/2010 | 23,440 | 22,556 | 25,654 | 22,006 | ||||||||||||
1/31/2011 | 22,136 | 21,302 | 24,472 | 20,429 | ||||||||||||
4/30/2011 | 22,682 | 21,827 | 25,223 | 20,937 | ||||||||||||
7/31/2011 | 23,627 | 22,736 | 26,006 | 22,011 | ||||||||||||
10/31/2011 | 24,145 | 23,235 | 26,625 | 22,500 | ||||||||||||
1/31/2012 | 25,448 | 24,488 | 27,923 | 23,751 | ||||||||||||
4/30/2012 | 26,145 | 25,159 | 28,089 | 24,358 | ||||||||||||
7/31/2012 | 27,165 | 26,141 | 28,740 | 25,240 |
1As outlined in the prospectus, the sales charge is reduced for accounts (and aggregated investments) of $100,000 or more and is eliminated for purchases of $1 million or more. There is no sales charge on dividends or capital gain distributions that are reinvested in additional shares. |
2The maximum initial sales charge was 4.75% prior to January 10, 2000. |
3The index is unmanaged and, therefore, has no expenses. |
4Results of the Lipper High Yield Municipal Debt Funds Average do not reflect any sales charges. |
5From September 26, 1994. |
The results shown are before taxes on fund distributions and sale of fund shares.
Average annual total returns based on a $1,000 investment (for periods ended July 31, 2012)* | ||||||||||||
1 year | 5 years | 10 years | ||||||||||
Class A shares | 10.64 | % | 3.67 | % | 4.34 | % | ||||||
*Assumes reinvestment of all distributions and payment of the maximum 3.75% sales charge. |
Investment results assume all distributions are reinvested and reflect applicable fees and expenses. When applicable, investment results reflect fee waivers, without which results would have been lower. Visit americanfunds.com for more information.
Shining a light:
investing in today’s municipal bond market
Media coverage of municipal bonds often centers on the fiscal woes of some local and state governments, but there’s a lot more to this vast and complex market. Here, we survey the market and talk to some of the fund’s investment professionals. Despite the challenging investment environment, they continue to find attractive opportunities among higher yielding bonds.
Crisis. Meltdown. Even “Munigeddon.” These are a few of the nouns that appeared quite frequently in media coverage of municipal bonds a year or two ago. To say that municipal bonds came in for some terrible press would be verging on understatement. Contentious “doomsday” predictions of widespread defaults, as well as deteriorating finances among some local and state governments, cast a shadow over the market. Investor confidence was shaken. Markets were roiled.
Fast-forward to the present, and recent history paints a very different picture. Even given continued fiscal challenges, municipal bonds have generated among the highest total returns of any fixed-income sector. Over American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund’s fiscal year ended July 31, 2012, investment-grade municipal bonds (rated Baa/BBB and above) were up 10.51%, while their below investment-grade counterparts rose 14.99% — as measured by the Barclays Municipal Bond Index and Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond Index, respectively. Meanwhile, the fund generated one of its best ever annual returns, 14.98% — continuing its track record of delivering a high level of income in a relatively less volatile way (see charts on pages 8 and 9). “Recent problems among a relatively small number of municipal issuers have not had a broad impact. This market is vast and diverse,” says Karl Zeile, the fund’s president and one of its portfolio counselors. Diversity and size help explain why, despite a handful of significant municipal bankruptcies, predictions of a wave of bond defaults — amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars, according to one analyst — failed to materialize.
Vast, complex and diverse
Just how big is the market? Recent estimates suggest that there are about 60,000 issuers and put the total number of municipal bonds outstanding at about 1 million. These bonds, in turn, have a total face value equivalent to approximately $3.7 trillion. On a typical weekday, about $11.4 billion worth of bonds are bought and sold.
Revenue bonds account for about two-thirds of municipal issuance, and they comprise a large majority of the fund’s investments. The viability of the projects being financed by revenue bonds and — by consequence — the financial outcome for bond investors, has very little to do with how full local and state coffers are. Revenue bonds are typically issued to finance a specific project that is then supported by income from that project or a related business enterprise.
[Begin Photo Caption]
[photo of Karl Zeile]
Karl Zeile, fund president and portfolio counselor
“Though there have been some positive developments, credit strains among municipal issuers are certainly not over. Nevertheless, for experienced research-driven high-yield investors, there continue to be compelling, diverse opportunities.”
[End Photo Caption]
[photo of construction cranes]
“In bond investing, you receive yield in compensation for taking risk. So among municipal issuers of higher yielding bonds, there are going to be some that ultimately don’t fare so well,” says portfolio counselor Neil Langberg. “Our job is to use our experience and research to navigate this vast market and do our best to avoid problems — seeking investments that will help the fund achieve its goal of providing higher tax-exempt income over the longer term.”
Investing in a diversified portfolio of bonds, rather than a few individual issues, can also help neutralize the effect of fluctuating returns. “We are acutely alert to the possibility of duress among credits, but no single issuer represents more than a small fraction of fund investments. The portfolio is also well-diversified in terms of types of credit risks,” emphasizes Chad Rach, who joined the fund’s roster of portfolio counselors in 2011.
Irrespective of the market environment, research and diversification are clearly vital — but what is the reality behind those unsettling stories about municipal defaults? The truth about the scale of defaults experienced might surprise you. For example, according to a study by Moody’s Investors Service of longer term bonds it had rated, there were just 71 U.S. municipal bond defaults between 1970 and 2011. Of these, 11 occurred in the final two years of that period. To put this in context, over the same 31-year period, the U.S. corporate bond market (which is about twice the size of the municipal market) experienced about 25 times as many defaults.
Looking past headline risk
Negative headlines — factual or speculative — can have a dramatic effect on municipal bond prices. The reason that market confidence can prove so fragile is that most municipal bonds are owned by individual investors. With little or no access to research and a potentially significant proportion of their wealth tied up in perhaps just a few bonds, such skittishness is understandable.
Research helps an investor to look past the headlines, enabling the actual investment risk of a bond to be assessed. Importantly, it also helps an investor to make an informed judgment on whether the potential returns adequately compensate for the risk of owning such a bond over the longer term. The fund’s investment in California redevelopment bonds offers a case in point.
In early 2011, Governor Jerry Brown announced his intention to abolish the state’s redevelopment agencies. These agencies issued bonds secured by property taxes from specific development zones. In a bid to raise new funds for planned redevelopment projects before the proposed legislation eliminated this option, many agencies rushed to the bond market.
At a time when quite a few investors were sitting on the sidelines, research gave the fund’s investment professionals the confidence to take action. They bought high-quality bonds with extremely attractive yields and later augmented their investment, taking advantage of renewed market jitters in the interim. “Higher yields suggested that the market had a skeptical view of bonds in this market segment. However, our research led us to conclude that a variety of securities offered a favorable risk-return profile,” says Chad. “Despite the closure of the agencies, coupon payments have continued intact. In our view, the pledge of tax revenue that secures these bonds is sound, and the total return potential over the longer term is quite attractive.”
[Begin Sidebar]
Your fund has a proven track record of delivering a high level of income
The fund has delivered a high level of income free of federal taxes. This chart shows the fund’s income return for each fiscal year and also displays its taxable yield equivalent for the highest tax bracket of the given year. The income return is based on dividend income, assuming reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, paid over the fiscal year, divided by the initial investment value at the start of each year.
[begin bar chart]
1995 | * | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income returns | 5.48 | 6.06 | 5.82 | 5.39 | 5.19 | 5.48 | 5.73 | 5.53 | 5.09 | 4.80 | 4.51 | 4.50 | 4.57 | 4.67 | 4.92 | 5.32 | 4.90 | 4.93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable equivalent | 9.07 | 10.03 | 9.64 | 8.92 | 8.59 | 9.07 | 9.41 | 9.01 | 7.83 | 7.38 | 6.94 | 6.92 | 7.03 | 7.18 | 7.57 | 8.18 | 7.54 | 7.58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maximum tax-rate | 39.6 | % | 39.6 | % | 39.6 | % | 39.6 | % | 39.6 | % | 39.6 | % | 39.1 | % | 38.6 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % |
[end bar chart]
*Period from 9/26/94–7/31/95.
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Photo Caption]
[photo of Neil Langberg]
Neil Langberg, portfolio counselor
“Our job is to use our experience and research to navigate this vast market and do our best to avoid problems — seeking investments that will help the fund achieve its goal of providing higher tax-exempt income over the longer term.”
[End Photo Caption]
[Begin Photo Caption]
[photo of Chad Rach]
Chad Rach, portfolio counselor
“We are acutely alert to the possibility of duress among credits, but no single issuer represents more than a small fraction of fund investments. The portfolio is also well-diversified in terms of types of credit risks.”
[End Photo Caption]
Munis can even help you fly
A recent investment in a sector far removed from traditional municipal finance offers another example of how research has steeled the portfolio counselors to take a bold view. The sector in question is airlines. Though airlines might appear an unlikely municipal bond sector, public authorities have issued many bonds on behalf of airlines, helping them to finance upgrades to facilities.
Anyone who has followed the ups and downs of the airline industry knows it is no stranger to bankruptcy. Likewise, experienced investors in higher yielding bonds regard default as an unpleasant occupational hazard. So, although the timing was somewhat unexpected, the fund’s investment professionals weren’t exactly shocked when American Airlines filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in November 2011. The possibility of default was something that they had been weighing for quite some time. Reflecting the commitment to managing a highly diversified portfolio, the fund’s investment in the troubled airline’s bonds at the time of filing was relatively small. Still, following the filing, as bond prices plummeted, a plan of action was needed. Unlike some other tax-exempt investors, the fund has an integrated approach to research. This, according to analyst Jerry Solomon, was crucial for rapid and informed decision making in the wake of the filing.
[Begin Sidebar]
Munis can add stability to a broader investment portfolio
A well-diversified portfolio invested in stocks and bonds can help smooth overall returns. Rather than mirroring moves in other markets, ups and downs in the municipal bond market often march to the beat of their own drum. Municipal bonds can therefore add diversification to a broader investment mix. Correlation — the mathematical concept used to describe how closely changes in the returns of different asset classes mirror each other — helps assess this potential benefit. The degree of closeness is measured on a scale running from –1 to +1. A correlation of –1 would indicate that the two returns tend to move by equal but opposite amounts (for example, if the correlation between Asset X and Asset Y is –1, then when X rises by 10%, Y will tend to fall by a similar percentage). Conversely, a correlation of +1 would indicate that the two assets’ returns tended to move up or down in lockstep. Finally, a correlation of zero would indicate no relationship between the returns of each asset class.
[spectrum from negatively correlated with muni bonds to positively correlated with muni bonds]
Correlation between municipal bonds and other assets (for the 10-year period through July 31, 2012) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash | Commodities | U.S stocks | Non-U.S. stocks | Gold | U.S. government bonds | |||||||||||||||||
−0.12 | −0.02 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.46 | |||||||||||||||||
Negatively correlated | Uncorrelated | Positively correlated | ||||||||||||||||||||
with muni bonds | with muni bonds | h muni bonds | ||||||||||||||||||||
Source: Morningstar Direct. |
For each asset class listed, the underlying index is as follows: Barclays Municipal Bond Index (U.S. municipal bonds); U.S. 3-month Treasury bills (cash); S&P GSCI Index (commodities); S&P 500 Composite Index (U.S. stocks); MSCI EAFE Index (non-U.S. stocks); S&P GSCI Gold Spot (gold); and Barclays U.S. Government Bond Index (U.S. government bonds). The indexes are unmanaged and, therefore, have no expenses.
[End Sidebar]
[photo of the side of an office building]
[Begin Sidebar]
Taking health care’s pulse
When it comes to prompting controversial predictions, the topic of health care could certainly give municipalities a run for their money. Given the wide-ranging nature of reform emanating from Capitol Hill and the fact that hospital facilities and continuing care retirement community (CCRC) bonds account for the portfolio’s largest sector weights, health care is a particular focus of research among the fund’s investment professionals. Over the past fiscal year, hospital bonds have continued to offer relatively high yields when compared to other similarly rated revenue bonds.
“Regardless of how the industry is reshaped, revenues that come from the government via programs like Medicare and Medicaid, as well as revenues from insurers and other private payers will likely continue to be pressured,” says analyst Jerry Solomon. “Rising costs and pressured revenue growth are among the reasons we expect to see a continuation of the consolidation among not-for-profit hospitals that is currently underway.” When deciding which health care organizations to invest in, the fund’s investment professionals look closely at management teams, market positions (due to specializations, reputation and patient demographics), and strategic vision (perhaps demonstrated by investments in upgrades or new facilities). As always, on-site visits are an important part of research and can often lead to telling insights. Following a research trip with analyst Aaron Applebaum at the end of 2011 that involved visiting the management of a high-risk start-up CCRC, portfolio counselor Chad Rach decided to accelerate moves to reduce credit risk in the fund’s CCRC investments. “To me, the management team didn’t appear appropriately concerned about recognizing and dealing with key business risks. I admired their self-confidence, but that was too much of a red flag. I felt that fund investors’ capital would best be invested in lower risk CCRC opportunities.”
[End Sidebar]
Jerry immediately began to work with Tara Torrens, an airline research analyst from the taxable bond team. “Although the airline was facing some critical challenges, a near-term shortage of cash was not one of them,” Jerry says. Tara and Jerry’s knowledge of past airline bankruptcies — as well as time spent poring over financial statements and brainstorming future scenarios — led to a surprising conclusion: Immediately after the bankruptcy, the price of the bonds appeared low given the company’s fundamentals. At those valuations, they concluded, the bonds were trading at prices below what the recovery value could be following the company’s restructuring. The fund’s investment professionals therefore not only decided to hold on to existing investments in American Airlines bonds, but also added to these investments. As of July 31, 2012, the airline’s unsecured bonds had appreciated materially from the depths witnessed following the bankruptcy filing. The fund’s investment professionals continue to cautiously monitor the situation and will make further adjustments as warranted by circumstances.
Negative news about airlines has, by association, tended to cloud some investors’ thinking around another nontraditional municipal bond sector: airports. Over the 12 months ended July 31, 2012, the fund’s investments in airport bonds have increased from 5.7% of the portfolio to 8.0%. “Our research suggests that the pricing of some airport bonds reflects what is, in our view, an overestimation of their riskiness by the market,” says Karl.
“Contrary to received wisdom, the airport business model is not unlike a utility company, with many generating quite stable revenues. As a bond investor seeking income, that stability can be attractive,” observes analyst Courtney Koester. In recent years, Courtney has racked up a massive number of frequent-flyer miles visiting runway realignments, terminal expansions and other construction projects that are financed using municipal bonds.
The nuanced tax treatment of many airport bonds means that they offer relatively high yields to compensate those investors who may be unable to benefit from the bonds’ tax-exempt status. “Airport bonds typically offer additional yield of up to half-a-percent relative to similarly rated bonds in other sectors, simply because they are subject to the alternative minimum tax. That’s very welcome in the present low-yield environment,” says Chad. “Also, as they typically carry investment-grade ratings, the bonds tend to be easier to buy and sell than those below investment grade. That’s useful if, for example, we want to invest elsewhere or increase our holding in cash.”
Changing times, compelling opportunities
A quick glance at the fund’s summary portfolio starting on page 12 illustrates how the market’s diverse nature is well reflected in the portfolio. At fiscal year-end, hospitals and continuing care retirement communities accounted for the portfolio’s two largest sector weights (see “Taking health care’s pulse,” on page 10).
These were complemented by significant holdings in other sectors that might be less familiar to some fund investors: tax-assessment (often used to finance infrastructure for residential developments), tribal gaming (Native American organizations that own and operate casino and resort facilities), and tobacco (backed by tobacco lawsuit settlement payments that the industry agreed to pay to most states).
The present-day market includes sizable sectors that were practically unheard of a decade or so ago. This is but one of a number of dramatic changes. Once common, municipal bond insurance is now a rarity, meaning that bond yields more accurately reflect the credit risk entailed. Meanwhile, individuals are increasingly opting to invest through mutual funds, rather than in municipal bonds directly.
In these changing times, municipal bonds could play a crucial role in investors’ overall investment mix. During some of the worst U.S. stock market declines of recent decades, returns generated by the municipal bond market have tended to hold up relatively well. In an era when many investments seem to rise and fall in tandem, municipal bonds have tended not to follow suit. They could, therefore, prove useful in helping you to diversify investment risk associated with stocks and other types of assets (see “Munis can add stability to a broader investment portfolio,” on page 9). “Though there have been some positive developments, credit strains among municipal issuers are certainly not over,” says Karl. “Nevertheless, for experienced research-driven high-yield investors, there continue to be compelling, diverse opportunities.” n
[Begin Sidebar]
A track record of delivering favorable returns with less volatility
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (for the five-year period ended 7/31/12)
[begin scatter chart]
Volatility | Average annual total return | |||||||
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund | 7.96 | % | 4.47 | % | ||||
Lipper High Yield Municipal Debt Funds Index | 10.49 | 3.25 | ||||||
Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond Index | 10.06 | 4.11 |
[end scatter chart]
Returns (Class A shares) include reinvestment of all distributions. Volatility is calculated at net asset value by Lipper using annualized standard deviation (based on monthly returns), a measure of how returns have varied from the mean; a lower number signifies lower volatility. The indexes are unmanaged and, therefore, have no expenses.
Fund result shown is for Class A shares at net asset value. If a sales charge (maximum 3.75%) had been deducted, the result would have been lower. Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
[End Sidebar]
Summary investment portfolio July 31, 2012
The following summary investment portfolio is designed to streamline the report and help investors better focus on the fund’s principal holdings. See the inside back cover for details on how to obtain a complete schedule of portfolio holdings.
[begin pie charts]
Quality ratings* | ||||||
Aaa/AAA | 0.7 | % | ||||
Aa/AA | 6.5 | |||||
A/A | 20.8 | |||||
Baa/BBB | 31.2 | |||||
Ba/BB | 6.8 | |||||
B | 6.2 | |||||
Caa/CCC or less | 0.8 | |||||
Unrated | 21.3 | |||||
Short-term securities & other assets less liabilities | 5.7 | |||||
*Bond ratings which typically range from Aaa/AAA (highest) to D (lowest), are assigned by credit rating agencies such as Moody's, Standard & Poor's and/or Fitch as an indication of an issuer's creditworthiness. If agency ratings differ, securities are placed in the lowest-rated category. Securities in the "unrated" category (at left) have not been rated by a rating agency; however, the investment adviser performs its own credit analysis and assigns comparable ratings that are used for compliance with fund's investment policies. The ratings are not covered by the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
[end pie charts]
Principal | Percent | |||||||||||
amount | Value | of net | ||||||||||
Bonds & notes - 94.29% | (000 | ) | (000 | ) | assets | |||||||
Arizona - 3.38% | ||||||||||||
Industrial Dev. of the City of Phoenix, Lease Rev. Bonds (Rowan University Project), Series 2012, 5.00% 2042 | $ | 10,410 | $ | 11,122 | .41 | % | ||||||
Industrial Dev. Auth. of the County of Pima, Water and Wastewater Rev. Bonds (Global Water Resources, LLC Project), Series 2007, AMT, 6.55% 2037 | 17,000 | 17,794 | ||||||||||
Industrial Dev. Auth. of the County of Pima, Water and Wastewater Rev. Bonds (Global Water Resources, LLC Project), Series 2008, AMT, 7.50% 2038 | 10,000 | 10,962 | 1.04 | |||||||||
Other securities | 53,390 | 1.93 | ||||||||||
93,268 | 3.38 | |||||||||||
California - 13.26% | ||||||||||||
Veterans G.O. Bonds, Series CD, AMT, 4.60% 2032 | 9,750 | 9,930 | .36 | |||||||||
Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Enterprise Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2008-B, 6.50% 2028 | 8,250 | 8,617 | .31 | |||||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Azusa Pacific University Project), Series 2011-B, 8.00% 2041 (1) | 7,500 | 8,778 | .32 | |||||||||
City of San Buenaventura, Rev. Bonds (Community Memorial Health System), Series 2011, 7.50% 2041 | 12,750 | 15,475 | .56 | |||||||||
Tobacco Securitization Auth. of Southern California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-backed Rev. Ref. Bonds (San Diego County Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.), Series 2006-A, 5.125% 2046 | 13,935 | 10,995 | .40 | |||||||||
Other securities | 312,608 | 11.31 | ||||||||||
366,403 | 13.26 | |||||||||||
Colorado - 4.69% | ||||||||||||
City and County of Denver, Dept. of Aviation, Special Facs. Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds (United Air Lines Project), Series 2007-A, AMT, 5.25% 2032 | 18,000 | 17,965 | ||||||||||
City and County of Denver, Dept. of Aviation, Special Facs. Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds (United Air Lines Project), Series 2007-A, AMT, 5.75% 2032 | 2,905 | 2,969 | .76 | |||||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Health Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society Project), Series 2012, 5.00% 2042 | 10,845 | 11,524 | .42 | |||||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc.), Series 2005, 5.00% 2035 | 13,500 | 13,563 | .49 | |||||||||
Regional Transportation Dist., Tax-Exempt Private Activity Bonds (Denver Transit Partners Eagle P3 Project), Series 2010, 6.00% 2041 | 14,800 | 16,870 | .61 | |||||||||
Other securities | 66,715 | 2.41 | ||||||||||
129,606 | 4.69 | |||||||||||
Florida - 9.39% | ||||||||||||
Citizens Property Insurance Corp., Personal Lines Account/Commercial Lines Account Secured Bonds, Series 2012-A-1, 5.00% 2021 | 8,500 | 9,824 | .35 | |||||||||
Lee County Industrial Dev. Auth., Healthcare Facs. Rev. Bonds (Shell Point/Alliance Obligated Group, Shell Point Village Project), Series 2006, 5.00% 2032 | 3,000 | 2,996 | ||||||||||
Lee County Industrial Dev. Auth., Healthcare Facs. Rev. Bonds (Shell Point/Alliance Obligated Group, Shell Point Village Project), Series 2006, 5.125% 2036 | 2,250 | 2,250 | ||||||||||
Lee County Industrial Dev. Auth., Healthcare Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Shell Point/Alliance Obligated Group, Shell Point Project), Series 2011-B, 6.50% 2031 | 2,600 | 2,895 | ||||||||||
Lee County Industrial Dev. Auth., Healthcare Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Shell Point/Alliance Obligated Group, Shell Point Village/Alliance Community Project), Series 2007, 5.00% 2016 | 3,455 | 3,743 | ||||||||||
Lee County Industrial Dev. Auth., Healthcare Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Shell Point/Alliance Obligated Group, Shell Point Village/Alliance Community Project), Series 2007, 5.00% 2022 | 3,000 | 3,111 | ||||||||||
Lee County Industrial Dev. Auth., Healthcare Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Shell Point/Alliance Obligated Group, Shell Point Village/Alliance Community Project), Series 2007, 5.00% 2029 | 13,425 | 13,503 | 1.03 | |||||||||
Lee County, Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-A, AMT, 5.375% 2032 | 9,935 | 10,959 | .40 | |||||||||
Seminole Tribe of Florida, Series A, 5.25% 2027 (1) | 11,650 | 11,884 | .43 | |||||||||
Other securities | 198,294 | 7.18 | ||||||||||
259,459 | 9.39 | |||||||||||
Illinois - 7.22% | ||||||||||||
City of Chicago, O'Hare International Airport, Special Fac. Rev. Ref. Bonds (American Airlines, Inc. Project), Series 2007, 5.50% 2030 (2) | 17,500 | 11,419 | .41 | |||||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Franciscan Communities, Inc.), Series 2007-A, 5.50% 2027 | 8,550 | 8,679 | .31 | |||||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (OSF Healthcare System), Series 2010-A, 6.00% 2039 | 9,055 | 10,436 | .38 | |||||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Provena Health), Series 2009-A, 7.75% 2034 | 9,800 | 12,630 | .46 | |||||||||
Fin. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Ref. Bonds (CHF-DeKalb II, L.L.C. - Northern Illinois University Project), Series 2011, 6.875% 2043 | 11,500 | 13,666 | .49 | |||||||||
Other securities | 142,746 | 5.17 | ||||||||||
199,576 | 7.22 | |||||||||||
Indiana - 2.39% | ||||||||||||
Fin. Auth., Midwestern Disaster Relief Rev. Bonds (Ohio Valley Electric Corp. Project), Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2039 | 8,175 | 8,516 | .31 | |||||||||
Indianapolis Airport Auth., Special Fac. Rev. Bonds (United Air Lines, Inc., Indianapolis Maintenance Center Project), Series 1995-A, AMT, 6.50% 2031 (2) | 3,500 | 44 | .00 | |||||||||
Other securities | 57,407 | 2.08 | ||||||||||
65,967 | 2.39 | |||||||||||
Louisiana - 2.19% | ||||||||||||
Local Government Environmental Facs. and Community Dev. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Westlake Chemical Corp. Projects), Series 2007, 6.75% 2032 | 9,500 | 10,697 | .39 | |||||||||
Tobacco Settlement Auth., Asset-backed Bonds, Series 2001-B, 5.50% 2030 | 9,760 | 9,955 | .36 | |||||||||
Other securities | 39,777 | 1.44 | ||||||||||
60,429 | 2.19 | |||||||||||
Michigan - 4.85% | ||||||||||||
City of Detroit, Water Supply System Rev. Bonds, Series 2011-A, 5.25% 2041 | 12,650 | 13,297 | .48 | |||||||||
Tobacco Settlement Fin. Auth., Tobacco Settlement Asset-backed Bonds, Current Interest Bonds, Series 2007-A, 6.00% 2048 | 23,355 | 19,211 | .70 | |||||||||
Wayne County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Bonds (Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport), Series 2005, AMT, National insured, 5.00% 2034 | 9,000 | 9,150 | .33 | |||||||||
Other securities | 92,425 | 3.34 | ||||||||||
134,083 | 4.85 | |||||||||||
Minnesota - 0.49% | ||||||||||||
Tobacco Securitization Auth., Tobacco Settlement Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-B, 5.25% 2031 | 8,500 | 9,580 | .34 | |||||||||
Other securities | 4,092 | .15 | ||||||||||
13,672 | .49 | |||||||||||
Missouri - 2.04% | ||||||||||||
State Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Auth., Water Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Missouri-American Water Co. Project), Series 2006, AMT, AMBAC insured, 4.60% 2036 | 10,000 | 9,947 | .36 | |||||||||
Other securities | 46,391 | 1.68 | ||||||||||
56,338 | 2.04 | |||||||||||
New Jersey - 3.13% | ||||||||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth., Energy Fac. Rev. Bonds (ACR Energy Partners, LLC Project), Series 2011-A, AMT, 10.50% 2032 (1) | 13,000 | 14,384 | .52 | |||||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth., Special Fac. Rev. Bonds (Continental Airlines, Inc. Project), Series 1999, AMT, 6.25% 2019 | 3,000 | 3,012 | ||||||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth., Special Fac. Rev. Bonds (Continental Airlines, Inc. Project), Series 1999, AMT, 6.25% 2029 | 15,350 | 15,412 | ||||||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth., Special Fac. Rev. Bonds (Continental Airlines, Inc. Project), Series 1999, AMT, 6.40% 2023 | 2,000 | 2,008 | .74 | |||||||||
Tobacco Settlement Fncg. Corp., Tobacco Settlement Asset-backed Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2007-1-A, 5.00% 2041 | 17,250 | 14,089 | .51 | |||||||||
Other securities | 37,439 | 1.36 | ||||||||||
86,344 | 3.13 | |||||||||||
New York - 3.20% | ||||||||||||
Liberty Dev. Corp., Liberty Rev. Ref. Bonds (Bank of America Tower at One Bryant Park Project), Series 2010, 6.375% 2049 | 12,500 | 14,292 | .52 | |||||||||
New York City Industrial Dev. Agcy., Special Fac. Rev. Bonds (American Airlines, Inc. John F. Kennedy International Airport Project), Series 2005, AMT, 7.625% 2025 (2) | 8,700 | 9,185 | ||||||||||
New York City Industrial Dev. Agcy., Special Fac. Rev. Bonds (American Airlines, Inc. John F. Kennedy International Airport Project), Series 2005, AMT, 8.00% 2028 (2) | 2,000 | 2,133 | .41 | |||||||||
Other securities | 62,796 | 2.27 | ||||||||||
88,406 | 3.20 | |||||||||||
Ohio - 3.61% | ||||||||||||
Air Quality Dev. Auth., Pollution Control Rev. Ref. Bonds (FirstEnergy Generation Corp. Project), Series 2009-C, 5.625% 2018 | 8,580 | 9,975 | .36 | |||||||||
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Fncg. Auth., Tobacco Settlement Asset-backed Bonds, Current Interest Bonds, Series 2007-A-2, 5.875% 2030 | 18,170 | 15,088 | .55 | |||||||||
County of Gallia, Hospital Facs. Rev. Ref. and Improvement Bonds (Holzer Health System Obligated Group Project), Series 2012-A, 8.00% 2042 | 11,000 | 12,311 | .44 | |||||||||
Other securities | 62,471 | 2.26 | ||||||||||
99,845 | 3.61 | |||||||||||
Pennsylvania - 4.35% | ||||||||||||
Hospitals and Higher Education Facs. Auth. of Philadelphia, Hospital Rev. Bonds (Temple University Health System Obligated Group), Series 2012-A, 5.625% 2042 | 12,295 | 12,885 | .47 | |||||||||
Other securities | 107,213 | 3.88 | ||||||||||
120,098 | 4.35 | |||||||||||
Texas - 7.21% | ||||||||||||
Brazos River Harbor Navigation Dist. of Brazoria County, Environmental Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Dow Chemical Co. Project), Series 2002-A-4, AMT, 5.95% 2033 | 13,220 | 14,779 | .54 | |||||||||
Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Fac. Improvement Corp., American Airlines, Inc. Rev. Bonds, Series 1999, AMT, 6.375% 2035 (2) | 22,250 | 10,377 | ||||||||||
Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Fac. Improvement Corp., American Airlines, Inc. Rev. Bonds, Series 2002, AMT, 8.25% 2036 (2) | 1,580 | 1,030 | .41 | |||||||||
City of Houston, Airport System Special Facs. Rev. Bonds (Continental Airlines, Inc. Terminal E Project), Series 2001, AMT, 6.75% 2021 | 3,000 | 3,011 | ||||||||||
City of Houston, Airport System Special Facs. Rev. Bonds (Continental Airlines, Inc. Terminal E Project), Series 2001, AMT, 6.75% 2029 | 13,100 | 13,153 | ||||||||||
City of Houston, Airport System Special Facs. Rev. Bonds (Continental Airlines, Inc. Terminal Improvement Projects), Series 2011, AMT, 6.50% 2030 | 9,300 | 10,247 | ||||||||||
City of Houston, Airport System Special Facs. Rev. Bonds (Continental Airlines, Inc. Terminal Improvement Projects), Series 2011, AMT, 6.625% 2038 | 3,000 | 3,287 | 1.07 | |||||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Current Interest Bonds, Series 2008-A, 5.625% 2033 | 2,000 | 2,235 | ||||||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Current Interest Bonds, Series 2008-A, 6.00% 2021 | 1,000 | 1,196 | ||||||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Insured Capital Appreciation Bonds, Series 2008-D, Assured Guaranty insured, 0% 2028 | 920 | 478 | ||||||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2008-F, 5.75% 2033 | 4,000 | 4,427 | ||||||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2008-F, 5.75% 2038 | 6,000 | 6,597 | ||||||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2009-A, 6.00% 2028 | 3,000 | 3,548 | ||||||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010, 6.00% 2034 | 1,500 | 1,792 | ||||||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-B, 5.00% 2042 | 7,000 | 7,598 | 1.01 | |||||||||
Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., Rev. Bonds (LBJ Infrastructure Group LLC IH-635 Managed Lanes Project), Series 2010, 7.00% 2040 | 7,250 | 8,873 | .32 | |||||||||
Other securities | 106,713 | 3.86 | ||||||||||
199,341 | 7.21 | |||||||||||
Virginia - 1.60% | ||||||||||||
Small Business Fncg. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Elizabeth River Crossings Opco, LLC Project), Series 2012, AMT, 5.50% 2042 | 15,000 | 16,581 | .60 | |||||||||
Other securities | 27,591 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
44,172 | 1.60 | |||||||||||
Washington - 0.54% | ||||||||||||
Health Care Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Virginia Mason Medical Center), Series 2007-A, 6.125% 2037 | 8,000 | 8,698 | .32 | |||||||||
Other securities | 6,155 | .22 | ||||||||||
14,853 | .54 | |||||||||||
Other states & U.S. territories - 20.75% | ||||||||||||
Other securities | 573,278 | 20.75 | ||||||||||
Total bonds & notes (cost: $2,441,620,000) | 2,605,138 | 94.29 | ||||||||||
Principal | Percent | |||||||||||
amount | Value | of net | ||||||||||
Short-term securities - 5.64% | (000 | ) | (000 | ) | assets | |||||||
State of Colorado, General Fund Tax and Rev. Anticipation Notes, Series 2012-A, 2.00% 6/27/2013 | 6,000 | 6,100 | ||||||||||
State of Colorado, General Fund Tax and Rev. Anticipation Notes, Series 2012-A, 2.50% 6/27/2013 | 4,000 | 4,085 | .37 | |||||||||
State of Oregon, Full Faith and Credit Tax Anticipation Notes, Series 2012-A, 2.00% 6/28/2013 | 10,000 | 10,169 | .37 | |||||||||
Public Building Auth. of the County of Montgomery, Pooled Fncg. Rev. Bonds (Tennessee County Loan Pool), Series 2002, Bank of America LOC, 0.26% 2032 (3) | 1,855 | 1,855 | ||||||||||
Public Building Auth. of the County of Montgomery, Pooled Fncg. Rev. Bonds (Tennessee County Loan Pool), Series 2008, Bank of America LOC, 0.26% 2038 (3) | 9,560 | 9,560 | .41 | |||||||||
City of Houston, Texas, Tax and Rev. Anticipation Notes, Series 2012, 2.00% 6/28/2013 | 10,000 | 10,169 | .37 | |||||||||
State of Texas, Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 2011-A, 2.50% 8/30/2012 | 9,900 | 9,919 | .36 | |||||||||
Other securities | 103,930 | 3.76 | ||||||||||
Total short-term securities (cost: $155,775,000) | 155,787 | 5.64 | ||||||||||
Total investment securities (cost: $2,597,395,000) | 2,760,925 | 99.93 | ||||||||||
Other assets less liabilities | 1,896 | .07 | ||||||||||
Net assets | $ | 2,762,821 | 100.00 | % |
“Other securities” includes all issues that are not disclosed separately in the summary investment portfolio, including securities which were valued under fair value procedures adopted by authority of the board of trustees. The total value of all such securities was $6,216,000, which represented .22% of the net assets of the fund. | |||
(1) Acquired in a transaction exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. May be resold in the U.S. in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. The total value of all such securities, including those in "Other securities," was $87,211,000, which represented 3.16% of the net assets of the fund. | |||
(2) Scheduled interest and/or principal payment was not received. | |||
(3) Coupon rate may change periodically. For short-term securities, the date of the next scheduled coupon rate change is considered to be the maturity date. | |||
Key to abbreviations | |||
Agcy. = Agency | |||
AMT = Alternative Minimum Tax | |||
Auth. = Authority | |||
Certs. of Part. = Certificates of Participation | |||
Dept. = Department | |||
Dev. = Development | |||
Dist. = District | |||
Econ. = Economic | |||
Fac. = Facility | |||
Facs. = Facilities | |||
Fin. = Finance | |||
Fncg. = Financing | |||
G.O. = General Obligation | |||
LOC = Letter of Credit | |||
Preref. = Prerefunded | |||
Redev. = Redevelopment | |||
Ref. = Refunding | |||
Rev. = Revenue | |||
TECP = Tax-Exempt Commercial Paper | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements |
Financial statements
Statement of assets and liabilities | ||||||||
at July 31, 2012 | (dollars in thousands) | |||||||
Assets: | ||||||||
Investment securities, at value (cost: $2,597,395) | $ | 2,760,925 | ||||||
Cash | 99 | |||||||
Receivables for: | ||||||||
Sales of fund's shares | $ | 9,037 | ||||||
Interest | 30,809 | 39,846 | ||||||
2,800,870 | ||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||
Payables for: | ||||||||
Purchases of investments | 30,831 | |||||||
Repurchases of fund's shares | 4,414 | |||||||
Dividends on fund's shares | 1,038 | |||||||
Investment advisory services | 740 | |||||||
Services provided by related parties | 921 | |||||||
Trustees' deferred compensation | 85 | |||||||
Other | 20 | 38,049 | ||||||
Net assets at July 31, 2012 | $ | 2,762,821 | ||||||
Net assets consist of: | ||||||||
Capital paid in on shares of beneficial interest | $ | 2,760,390 | ||||||
Undistributed net investment income | 2,822 | |||||||
Accumulated net realized loss | (163,921 | ) | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation | 163,530 | |||||||
Net assets at July 31, 2012 | $ | 2,762,821 |
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per-share amounts) | ||||||||||||
Shares of beneficial interest issued and outstanding (no stated par value) - | ||||||||||||
unlimited shares authorized (182,561 total shares outstanding) | ||||||||||||
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share | ||||||||||
Class A | $ | 2,286,211 | 151,068 | $ | 15.13 | |||||||
Class B | 15,760 | 1,041 | 15.13 | |||||||||
Class C | 169,995 | 11,233 | 15.13 | |||||||||
Class F-1 | 190,998 | 12,621 | 15.13 | |||||||||
Class F-2 | 86,655 | 5,726 | 15.13 | |||||||||
Class R-6 | 13,202 | 872 | 15.13 | |||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements |
Statement of operations | ||||||||
for the year ended July 31, 2012 | (dollars in thousands) | |||||||
Investment income: | ||||||||
Income: | ||||||||
Interest | $ | 128,286 | ||||||
Fees and expenses*: | ||||||||
Investment advisory services | $ | 8,099 | ||||||
Distribution services | 7,362 | |||||||
Transfer agent services | 1,238 | |||||||
Administrative services | 306 | |||||||
Reports to shareholders | 143 | |||||||
Registration statement and prospectus | 138 | |||||||
Trustees' compensation | 19 | |||||||
Auditing and legal | 71 | |||||||
Custodian | 6 | |||||||
Federal and state income taxes | 311 | |||||||
Other state and local taxes | 22 | |||||||
Other | 60 | 17,775 | ||||||
Net investment income | 110,511 | |||||||
Net realized loss and unrealized appreciation on investments | ||||||||
Net realized loss on investments | (24,384 | ) | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 252,459 | |||||||
Net realized loss and unrealized appreciation on investments | 228,075 | |||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | $ | 338,586 | ||||||
*Additional information related to class-specific fees and expenses is included in the Notes to Financial Statements. | ||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements | ||||||||
Statements of changes in net assets | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Year ended July 31 | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Operations: | ||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 110,511 | $ | 111,789 | ||||
Net realized loss on investments | (24,384 | ) | (33,593 | ) | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 252,459 | (7,609 | ) | |||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | 338,586 | 70,587 | ||||||
Dividends paid or accrued to shareholders from net investment income | (110,000 | ) | (112,272 | ) | ||||
Net capital share transactions | 323,576 | (286,346 | ) | |||||
Total increase (decrease) in net assets | 552,162 | (328,031 | ) | |||||
Net assets: | ||||||||
Beginning of year | 2,210,659 | 2,538,690 | ||||||
End of year (including undistributed net investment income: $2,822 and $2,757, respectively) | $ | 2,762,821 | $ | 2,210,659 | ||||
See Notes to Financial Statements |
Notes to financial statements
1. | Organization |
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (the "fund") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end, diversified management investment company. The fund seeks to provide a high level of current income exempt from regular federal income tax.
The fund has six share classes consisting of five retail share classes (Classes A, B and C, as well as two F share classes, F-1 and F-2) and one share class that is only available to the American Funds Portfolio Series (Class R-6). Some share classes are only available to limited categories of investors. The fund’s share classes are further described below:
Share class | Initial sales charge | Contingent deferred sales charge upon redemption | Conversion feature |
Class A | Up to 3.75% | None (except 1% for certain redemptions within one year of purchase without an initial sales charge) | None |
Class B* | None | Declines from 5% to 0% for redemptions within six years of purchase | Class B converts to Class A after eight years |
Class C | None | 1% for redemptions within one year of purchase | Class C converts to Class F-1 after 10 years |
Classes F-1 and F-2 | None | None | None |
Class R-6 | None | None | None |
*Class B shares of the fund are not available for purchase.
Holders of all share classes have equal pro rata rights to assets, dividends and liquidation proceeds. Each share class has identical voting rights, except for the exclusive right to vote on matters affecting only its class. Share classes have different fees and expenses ("class-specific fees and expenses"), primarily due to different arrangements for distribution, administrative and shareholder services. Differences in class-specific fees and expenses will result in differences in net investment income and, therefore, the payment of different per-share dividends by each class.
2. | Significant accounting policies |
The financial statements have been prepared to comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The fund follows the significant accounting policies described below, as well as the valuation policies described in the next section on valuation.
Security transactions and related investment income – Security transactions are recorded by the fund as of the date the trades are executed with brokers. Realized gains and losses from security transactions are determined based on the specific identified cost of the securities. In the event a security is purchased with a delayed payment date, the fund will segregate liquid assets sufficient to meet its payment obligations. Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. Market discounts, premiums and original issue discounts on fixed-income securities are amortized daily over the expected life of the security.
Class allocations – Income, fees and expenses (other than class-specific fees and expenses) are allocated daily among the various share classes based on the relative value of their settled shares. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily among the various share classes based on their relative net assets. Class-specific fees and expenses, such as distribution, administrative and shareholder services, are charged directly to the respective share class.
Dividends and distributions to shareholders – Dividends paid to shareholders are declared daily after the determination of the fund’s net investment income and are paid to shareholders monthly. Distributions paid to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
3. | Valuation |
Capital Research and Management Company (“CRMC”), the fund’s investment adviser, values the fund’s investments at fair value as defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The net asset value of each share class of the fund is generally determined as of approximately 4:00 p.m. New York time each day the New York Stock Exchange is open.
Methods and inputs – The fund’s investment adviser uses the following methods and inputs to establish the fair value of the fund’s assets and liabilities. Use of particular methods and inputs may vary over time based on availability and relevance as market and economic conditions evolve.
Fixed-income securities, including short-term securities purchased with more than 60 days left to maturity, are generally valued at prices obtained from one or more pricing vendors. Vendors value such securities based on one or more of the following inputs: benchmark yields, transactions, bids, offers, quotations from dealers and trading systems, new issues, spreads and other relationships observed in the markets among comparable securities; and proprietary pricing models such as yield measures calculated using factors such as cash flows, financial or collateral performance and other reference data. For certain distressed securities, valuations may include cash flows or liquidation values using a net present value calculation based on inputs that include, but are not limited to, financial statements and debt contracts.
When the fund’s investment adviser deems it appropriate to do so (such as when vendor prices are unavailable or not deemed to be representative), fixed-income securities will be valued in good faith at the mean quoted bid and ask prices that are reasonably and timely available (or bid prices, if ask prices are not available) or at prices for securities of comparable maturity, quality and type.
Short-term securities purchased within 60 days to maturity are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. The value of short-term securities originally purchased with maturities greater than 60 days is determined based on an amortized value to par when they reach 60 days.
Securities and other assets for which representative market quotations are not readily available or are considered unreliable by the fund’s investment adviser are fair valued as determined in good faith under fair value guidelines adopted by authority of the fund’s board of trustees as further described below. The investment adviser follows fair valuation guidelines, consistent with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules and guidance, to consider relevant principles and factors when making fair value determinations. The investment adviser considers relevant indications of value that are reasonably and timely available to it in determining the fair value to be assigned to a particular security, such as the type and cost of the security; contractual or legal restrictions on resale of the security; relevant financial or business developments of the issuer; actively traded similar or related securities; conversion or exchange rights on the security; related corporate actions; significant events occurring after the close of trading in the security; and changes in overall market conditions. Fair valuations and valuations of investments that are not actively trading involve judgment and may differ materially from valuations that would have been used had greater market activity occurred.
Processes and structure– The fund’s board of trustees has delegated authority to the fund’s investment adviser to make fair value determinations, subject to board oversight. The investment adviser has established a Joint Fair Valuation Committee (the “Fair Valuation Committee”) to administer, implement and oversee the fair valuation process, and to make fair value decisions. The Fair Valuation Committee regularly reviews its own fair value decisions, as well as decisions made under its standing instructions to the investment adviser’s valuation teams. The Fair Valuation Committee reviews changes in fair value measurements from period to period and may, as deemed appropriate, update the fair valuation guidelines to better reflect the results of back testing and address new or evolving issues. The Fair Valuation Committee reports any changes to the fair valuation guidelines to the board of trustees with supplemental information to support the changes. The fund’s board and audit committee also regularly review reports that describe fair value determinations and methods.
The fund’s investment adviser has also established a Fixed-Income Pricing Review Group to administer and oversee the fixed-income valuation process, including the use of fixed-income pricing vendors. This group regularly reviews pricing vendor information and market data. Pricing decisions, processes and controls over security valuation are also subject to additional internal reviews, including an annual control self-evaluation program facilitated by the investment adviser’s compliance group.
Classifications – The fund’s investment adviser classifies the fund’s assets and liabilities into three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities. Level 1 values are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 values are based on significant observable market inputs, such as quoted prices for similar securities and quoted prices in inactive markets. Level 3 values are based on significant unobservable inputs that reflect the investment adviser’s determination of assumptions that market participants might reasonably use in valuing the securities. The valuation levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with the underlying investment. For example, U.S. government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market. The following table presents the fund’s valuation levels as of July 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
Investment securities | |||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||||
Bonds & notes: | |||||||||||||||||
California | $ | - | $ | 366,403 | $ | - | $ | 366,403 | |||||||||
Florida | - | 255,004 | 4,455 | 259,459 | |||||||||||||
Illinois | - | 199,576 | - | 199,576 | |||||||||||||
Texas | - | 199,341 | - | 199,341 | |||||||||||||
Michigan | - | 134,083 | - | 134,083 | |||||||||||||
Colorado | - | 129,606 | - | 129,606 | |||||||||||||
Pennsylvania | - | 120,098 | - | 120,098 | |||||||||||||
Ohio | - | 99,845 | - | 99,845 | |||||||||||||
Arizona | - | 93,268 | - | 93,268 | |||||||||||||
New York | - | 88,406 | - | 88,406 | |||||||||||||
Other states & U.S. territories | - | 913,292 | 1,761 | 915,053 | |||||||||||||
Short-term securities | - | 155,787 | - | 155,787 | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | - | $ | 2,754,709 | $ | 6,216 | $ | 2,760,925 |
4. | Risk factors |
Investing in the fund may involve certain risks including, but not limited to, those described below.
Market conditions — The prices of, and the income generated by, the securities held by the fund may decline due to market conditions and other factors, including those directly involving the issuers of securities held by the fund.
Investing in bonds — Rising interest rates will generally cause the prices of bonds and other debt securities to fall. Longer maturity debt securities may be subject to greater price fluctuations than shorter maturity debt securities. In addition, falling interest rates may cause an issuer to redeem, call or refinance a security before its stated maturity, which may result in the fund having to reinvest the proceeds in lower yielding securities.
Bonds and other debt securities are subject to credit risk, which is the possibility that the credit strength of an issuer will weaken and/or an issuer of a debt security will fail to make timely payments of principal or interest and the security will go into default.
Thinly traded securities — There may be little trading in the secondary market for particular bonds or other debt securities, which may make them more difficult to value, acquire or sell.
Credit and liquidity support — Changes in the credit quality of banks and financial institutions providing credit and liquidity support features with respect to securities held by the fund could cause the values of these securities to decline.
Investing in lower rated bonds — Lower rated bonds and other lower rated debt securities generally have higher rates of interest and involve greater risk of default or price declines due to changes in the issuer’s creditworthiness than those of higher quality debt securities. The market prices of these securities may fluctuate more than the prices of higher quality debt securities and may decline significantly in periods of general economic difficulty. These risks may be increased with respect to investments in junk bonds.
Investing in similar municipal bonds — Investing significantly in municipal obligations of issuers in the same state or backed by revenues of similar types of projects or industries may make the fund more susceptible to certain economic, political or regulatory occurrences. As a result, the potential for fluctuations in the fund’s share price may increase.
Management — The investment adviser to the fund actively manages the fund’s investments. Consequently, the fund is subject to the risk that the methods and analyses employed by the investment adviser in this process may not produce the desired results. This could cause the fund to lose value or its investment results to lag relevant benchmarks or other funds with similar objectives.
5. | Taxation and distributions |
Federal income taxation – The fund complies with the requirements under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to mutual funds and intends to distribute substantially all of its net income and net capital gains each year. The fund is not subject to income taxes to the extent taxable income and net capital gains are distributed. Generally, income earned by the fund is exempt from federal income taxes; however, the fund may earn taxable income from certain investments.
As of and during the period ended July 31, 2012, the fund did not have a liability for any unrecognized tax benefits. The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the statement of operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
The fund is not subject to examination by U.S. federal tax authorities for tax years before 2008 and by state tax authorities for tax years before 2007.
Distributions – Distributions paid to shareholders are based on net investment income and net realized gains determined on a tax basis, which may differ from net investment income and net realized gains for financial reporting purposes. These differences are due primarily to different treatment for items such as short-term capital gains and losses; capital losses related to sales of certain securities within 30 days of purchase; deferred expenses; cost of investments sold; net capital losses; amortization of discounts; and income on certain investments. The fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the year in which the net investment income and net realized gains are recorded by the fund for financial reporting purposes.
During the year ended July 31, 2012, the fund reclassified $909,000 from accumulated net realized loss to undistributed net investment income, $1,355,000 from undistributed net investment income to capital paid in on shares of beneficial interest and $17,001,000 from capital paid in on shares of beneficial interest to accumulated net realized loss to align financial reporting with tax reporting.
Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”), net capital losses recognized after July 31, 2011, may be carried forward indefinitely, and their character is retained as short-term and/or long-term losses. Previously, net capital losses were carried forward for eight years and treated as short-term losses. As a transition rule, the Act requires that post-enactment net capital losses be used before pre-enactment net capital losses.
As of July 31, 2012, the tax basis components of distributable earnings, unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and cost of investment securities were as follows:
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Undistributed tax-exempt income | $ | 1,039 | ||||||
Capital loss carryforward*: | ||||||||
No expiration | $ | (48,976 | ) | |||||
Expiring 2013 | (3,652 | ) | ||||||
Expiring 2017 | (14,384 | ) | ||||||
Expiring 2018 | (69,969 | ) | ||||||
Expiring 2019 | (24,408 | ) | (161,389 | ) | ||||
Gross unrealized appreciation on investment securities | 225,290 | |||||||
Gross unrealized depreciation on investment securities | (58,712 | ) | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation on investment securities | 166,578 | |||||||
Cost of investment securities | 2,594,347 | |||||||
*Reflects the expiration of capital loss carryforward of $17,001,000. The capital loss carryforward will be used to offset any capital gains realized by the fund in future years through the expiration dates. The fund will not make distributions from capital gains while a capital loss carryforward remains. |
Tax-exempt income distributions paid or accrued to shareholders were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year ended July 31 | ||||||||
Share class | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Class A | $ | 92,406 | $ | 94,777 | ||||
Class B | 724 | 1,164 | ||||||
Class C | 5,748 | 5,987 | ||||||
Class F-1 | 7,482 | 7,466 | ||||||
Class F-2 | 3,554 | 2,878 | ||||||
Class R-6* | 86 | - | ||||||
Total | $ | 110,000 | $ | 112,272 | ||||
*Class R-6 shares were offered beginning May 11, 2012. |
6. | Fees and transactions with related parties |
CRMC, the fund’s investment adviser, is the parent company of American Funds Distributors,® Inc. ("AFD"), the principal underwriter of the fund’s shares, and American Funds Service Company® ("AFS"), the fund’s transfer agent.
Investment advisory services – The fund has an investment advisory and service agreement with CRMC that provides for monthly fees accrued daily. These fees are based on a series of decreasing annual rates beginning with 0.30% on the first $60 million of daily net assets and decreasing to 0.15% on such assets in excess of $3 billion. The agreement also provides for monthly fees, accrued daily, of 3.00% on the first $3,333,333 of the fund's monthly gross income and 2.50% on such income in excess of $3,333,333. For the year ended July 31, 2012, the investment advisory services fee was $8,099,000, which was equivalent to an annualized rate of 0.336% of average daily net assets.
Class-specific fees and expenses – Expenses that are specific to individual share classes are accrued directly to the respective share class. The principal class-specific fees and expenses are described below:
Distribution services – The fund has plans of distribution for all share classes, except Class F-2 and R-6 shares. Under the plans, the board of trustees approves certain categories of expenses that are used to finance activities primarily intended to sell fund shares and service existing accounts. The plans provide for payments, based on an annualized percentage of average daily net assets, ranging from 0.30% to 1.00% as noted below. In some cases, the board of trustees has limited the amounts that may be paid to less than the maximum allowed by the plans. All share classes with a plan may use up to 0.25% of average daily net assets to pay service fees, or to compensate AFD for paying service fees, to firms that have entered into agreements with AFD to provide certain shareholder services. The remaining amounts available to be paid under each plan are paid to dealers to compensate them for their sales activities.
For Class A shares, distribution-related expenses include the reimbursement of dealer and wholesaler commissions paid by AFD for certain shares sold without a sales charge. This share class reimburses AFD for amounts billed within the prior 15 months but only to the extent that the overall annual expense limit of 0.30% is not exceeded. As of July 31, 2012, there were no unreimbursed expenses subject to reimbursement for Class A shares.
Share class | Currently approved limits | Plan limits |
Class A | 0.30% | 0.30% |
Class B | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Class C | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Class F-1 | 0.25 | 0.50 |
Transfer agent services – The fund has a shareholder services agreement with AFS under which the fund compensates AFS for providing transfer agent services to each of the fund’s share classes. These services include recordkeeping, shareholder communications and transaction processing. In addition, the fund reimburses AFS for amounts paid to third parties for performing transfer agent services on behalf of fund shareholders.
During the period August 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011, only Class A and B shares were subject to the shareholder services agreement with AFS. During this period, AFS and other third parties were compensated for providing transfer agent services to Class C and F shares through the fees paid by the fund to CRMC under the fund’s administrative services agreement with CRMC as described in the administrative services section below; CRMC paid for any transfer agent services expenses in excess of 0.10% of the respective average daily net assets of each of such share classes.
Effective January 1, 2012, the shareholder services agreement with AFS was modified to include Class C and F shares and payment for transfer agent services for such classes under the administrative services agreement terminated. Under this structure, transfer agent services expenses for some classes may exceed 0.10% of average daily net assets, resulting in an increase in expenses paid by some share classes.
For the year ended July 31, 2012, the total transfer agent services fee paid under these agreements was $1,238,000, of which $1,142,000 was paid by the fund to AFS and $96,000 was paid by the fund to CRMC through its administrative services agreement with the fund. Amounts paid to CRMC by the fund were then paid by CRMC to AFS and other third parties.
Administrative services – The fund has an administrative services agreement with CRMC under which the fund compensates CRMC for providing administrative services to Class A, C, F and R shares. These services include, but are not limited to, coordinating, monitoring, assisting and overseeing third parties that provide services to fund shareholders.
During the period August 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011, the agreement applied only to Class C and F shares. The agreement also required CRMC to arrange for the provision of transfer agent services for such share classes, which paid CRMC annual fees up to 0.15% of their respective average daily net assets. During this period, up to 0.05% of these fees were used to compensate CRMC for performing administrative services; all other amounts paid under this agreement were used to compensate AFS and other third parties for transfer agent services.
Effective January 1, 2012, the administrative services agreement with CRMC was modified to include Class A shares. Under the revised agreement, Class A shares pay an annual fee of 0.01% and Class C and F shares pay an annual fee of 0.05% of their respective average daily net assets to CRMC for administrative services. Fees for transfer agent services are no longer included as part of the administrative services fee paid by the fund to CRMC. Effective April 1, 2012, the administrative services agreement was amended to include Class R shares. Class R shares pay an annual fee of 0.05% of their respective average daily net assets to CRMC for administrative services.
For the year ended July 31, 2012, total fees paid to CRMC for performing administrative services were $306,000.
Class-specific expenses under the agreements described above for the year ended July 31, 2012, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Share class | Distribution services | Transfer agent services | Administrative services | |||||||||
Class A | $ | 5,269 | $ | 948 | $ | 121 | ||||||
Class B | 184 | 9 | Not applicable | |||||||||
Class C | 1,497 | 71 | 71 | |||||||||
Class F-1 | 412 | 152 | 79 | |||||||||
Class F-2 | Not applicable | 58 | 34 | |||||||||
Class R-6* | Not applicable | - | 1 | |||||||||
Total class-specific expenses | $ | 7,362 | $ | 1,238 | $ | 306 | ||||||
*Class R-6 shares were offered beginning May 11, 2012. |
Trustees’ deferred compensation – Trustees who are unaffiliated with CRMC may elect to defer the cash payment of part or all of their compensation. These deferred amounts, which remain as liabilities of the fund, are treated as if invested in shares of the fund or other American Funds. These amounts represent general, unsecured liabilities of the fund and vary according to the total returns of the selected funds. Trustees’ compensation of $19,000, shown on the accompanying financial statements, includes $18,000 in current fees (either paid in cash or deferred) and a net increase of $1,000 in the value of the deferred amounts.
Affiliated officers and trustees – Officers and certain trustees of the fund are or may be considered to be affiliated with CRMC, AFS and AFD. No affiliated officers or trustees received any compensation directly from the fund.
7. | Capital share transactions |
Capital share transactions in the fund were as follows (dollars and shares in thousands):
Sales* | Reinvestments of dividends | Repurchases* | Net increase (decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share class | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended July 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 509,689 | 35,236 | $ | 82,858 | 5,750 | $ | (344,207 | ) | (24,044 | ) | $ | 248,340 | 16,942 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class B | 2,931 | 203 | 643 | 45 | (10,779 | ) | (750 | ) | (7,205 | ) | (502 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Class C | 50,802 | 3,512 | 5,127 | 356 | (36,751 | ) | (2,545 | ) | 19,178 | 1,323 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class F-1 | 67,402 | 4,664 | 7,320 | 508 | (45,845 | ) | (3,175 | ) | 28,877 | 1,997 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class F-2 | 49,208 | 3,425 | 3,064 | 212 | (30,888 | ) | (2,116 | ) | 21,384 | 1,521 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R-6† | 12,916 | 867 | 86 | 5 | - | - | 13,002 | 872 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(decrease) | $ | 692,948 | 47,907 | $ | 99,098 | 6,876 | $ | (468,470 | ) | (32,630 | ) | $ | 323,576 | 22,153 | ||||||||||||||||||
Year ended July 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 334,828 | 24,284 | $ | 81,211 | 5,930 | $ | (641,545 | ) | (47,031 | ) | $ | (225,506 | ) | (16,817 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | 2,611 | 189 | 992 | 72 | (17,946 | ) | (1,313 | ) | (14,343 | ) | (1,052 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Class C | 28,886 | 2,095 | 5,015 | 366 | (57,372 | ) | (4,215 | ) | (23,471 | ) | (1,754 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Class F-1 | 37,769 | 2,763 | 6,780 | 495 | (76,434 | ) | (5,598 | ) | (31,885 | ) | (2,340 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Class F-2 | 32,180 | 2,355 | 2,077 | 152 | (25,398 | ) | (1,870 | ) | 8,859 | 637 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(decrease) | $ | 436,274 | 31,686 | $ | 96,075 | 7,015 | $ | (818,695 | ) | (60,027 | ) | $ | (286,346 | ) | (21,326 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
*Includes exchanges between share classes of the fund. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
†Class R-6 shares were offered beginning May 11, 2012. |
8. | Investment transactions |
The fund made purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities and U.S. government obligations, if any, of $755,985,000 and $464,694,000, respectively, during the year ended July 31, 2012.
Financial highlights
Income (loss) from investment operations(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | Net investment income | Net gains (losses) on securities (both realized and unrealized) | Total from investment operations | Dividends (from net investment income) | Net asset value, end of period | Total return(2) (3) | Net assets, end of period (in millions) | Ratio of expenses to average net assets before waivers | Ratio of expenses to average net assets after waivers(3) | Ratio of net income to average net assets(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2012 | $ | 13.78 | $ | .66 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 2.01 | $ | (.66 | ) | $ | 15.13 | 14.98 | % | $ | 2,286 | .68 | % | .68 | % | 4.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2011 | 13.97 | .67 | (.19 | ) | .48 | (.67 | ) | 13.78 | 3.57 | 1,849 | .64 | .64 | 4.86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2010 | 12.69 | .66 | 1.28 | 1.94 | (.66 | ) | 13.97 | 15.50 | 2,109 | .68 | .68 | 4.82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2009 | 14.21 | .68 | (1.52 | ) | (.84 | ) | (.68 | ) | 12.69 | (5.69 | ) | 1,738 | .72 | .70 | 5.43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2008 | 15.54 | .72 | (1.34 | ) | (.62 | ) | (.71 | ) | 14.21 | (4.07 | ) | 1,851 | .69 | .65 | 4.83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2012 | 13.78 | .56 | 1.35 | 1.91 | (.56 | ) | 15.13 | 14.14 | 16 | 1.42 | 1.42 | 3.96 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2011 | 13.97 | .56 | (.19 | ) | .37 | (.56 | ) | 13.78 | 2.78 | 21 | 1.41 | 1.41 | 4.07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2010 | 12.69 | .56 | 1.28 | 1.84 | (.56 | ) | 13.97 | 14.67 | 36 | 1.42 | 1.42 | 4.11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2009 | 14.21 | .59 | (1.52 | ) | (.93 | ) | (.59 | ) | 12.69 | (6.39 | ) | 43 | 1.46 | 1.45 | 4.70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2008 | 15.54 | .61 | (1.34 | ) | (.73 | ) | (.60 | ) | 14.21 | (4.76 | ) | 54 | 1.41 | 1.37 | 4.11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class C: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2012 | 13.78 | .55 | 1.35 | 1.90 | (.55 | ) | 15.13 | 14.09 | 170 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 3.86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2011 | 13.97 | .56 | (.19 | ) | .37 | (.56 | ) | 13.78 | 2.73 | 137 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 4.03 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2010 | 12.69 | .55 | 1.28 | 1.83 | (.55 | ) | 13.97 | 14.60 | 163 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 4.03 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2009 | 14.21 | .58 | (1.52 | ) | (.94 | ) | (.58 | ) | 12.69 | (6.44 | ) | 126 | 1.51 | 1.50 | 4.63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2008 | 15.54 | .61 | (1.34 | ) | (.73 | ) | (.60 | ) | 14.21 | (4.80 | ) | 120 | 1.45 | 1.42 | 4.06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class F-1: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2012 | 13.78 | .65 | 1.35 | 2.00 | (.65 | ) | 15.13 | 14.89 | 191 | .76 | .76 | 4.56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2011 | 13.97 | .65 | (.19 | ) | .46 | (.65 | ) | 13.78 | 3.45 | 146 | .76 | .76 | 4.73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2010 | 12.69 | .65 | 1.28 | 1.93 | (.65 | ) | 13.97 | 15.42 | 181 | .75 | .75 | 4.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2009 | 14.21 | .67 | (1.52 | ) | (.85 | ) | (.67 | ) | 12.69 | (5.77 | ) | 156 | .80 | .78 | 5.35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2008 | 15.54 | .71 | (1.34 | ) | (.63 | ) | (.70 | ) | 14.21 | (4.12 | ) | 168 | .74 | .70 | 4.77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class F-2: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2012 | 13.78 | .69 | 1.35 | 2.04 | (.69 | ) | 15.13 | 15.20 | 87 | .49 | .49 | 4.81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2011 | 13.97 | .69 | (.19 | ) | .50 | (.69 | ) | 13.78 | 3.74 | 58 | .48 | .48 | 5.03 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 7/31/2010 | 12.69 | .68 | 1.28 | 1.96 | (.68 | ) | 13.97 | 15.72 | 50 | .48 | .48 | 5.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period from 8/12/2008 to 7/31/2009(4) | 14.28 | .66 | (1.58 | ) | (.92 | ) | (.67 | ) | 12.69 | (6.19 | ) | 32 | .53 | (5) | .53 | (5) | 5.50 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R-6: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period from 5/11/2012 to 7/31/2012(4) | 14.86 | .14 | .28 | .42 | (.15 | ) | 15.13 | 2.85 | 13 | .08 | .08 | 1.00 |
Year ended July 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate for all share classes | 20 | % | 18 | % | 15 | % | 29 | % | 27 | % |
(1)Based on average shares outstanding. | |||||||||||
(2)Total returns exclude any applicable sales charges, including contingent deferred sales charges. | |||||||||||
(3)This column reflects the impact, if any, of certain waivers from CRMC. During some of the periods shown, CRMC reduced fees for investment advisory services. | |||||||||||
(4)Based on operations for the period shown and, accordingly, is not representative of a full year. | |||||||||||
(5)Annualized. | |||||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the summary investment portfolio, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (the "Fund") at July 31, 2012, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as "financial statements") are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at July 31, 2012, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
September 13, 2012
Expense example
unaudited
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as initial sales charges on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions (loads), and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund so you can compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire six-month period (February 1, 2012, through July 31, 2012).
Actual expenses:
The first line of each share class in the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled "Expenses paid during period" to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes:
The second line of each share class in the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio for the share class and an assumed rate of return of 5.00% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of the share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5.00% hypothetical example with the 5.00% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Notes:
There are some account fees that are charged to certain types of accounts, such as individual retirement accounts (generally, a $10 fee is charged to set up the account and an additional $10 fee is charged to the account annually), that would increase the amount of expenses paid on your account. In addition, Class F-1 and F-2 shareholders may be subject to fees charged by financial intermediaries, typically ranging from 0.75% to 1.50% of assets annually depending on services offered. You can estimate the impact of these fees by adding the amount of the fees to the total estimated expenses you paid on your account during the period as calculated above. In addition, your ending account value would be lower by the amount of these fees.
Note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line of each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning account value 2/1/2012 | Ending account value 7/31/2012 | Expenses paid during period* | Annualized expense ratio | |||||||||||||
Class A -- actual return | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,067.51 | $ | 3.50 | .68 | % | ||||||||
Class A -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,021.48 | 3.42 | .68 | ||||||||||||
Class B -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,063.74 | 7.18 | 1.40 | ||||||||||||
Class B -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,017.90 | 7.02 | 1.40 | ||||||||||||
Class C -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,063.47 | 7.39 | 1.44 | ||||||||||||
Class C -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,017.70 | 7.22 | 1.44 | ||||||||||||
Class F-1 -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,067.22 | 3.75 | .73 | ||||||||||||
Class F-1 -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,021.23 | 3.67 | .73 | ||||||||||||
Class F-2 -- actual return | 1,000.00 | 1,068.56 | 2.47 | .48 | ||||||||||||
Class F-2 -- assumed 5% return | 1,000.00 | 1,022.48 | 2.41 | .48 | ||||||||||||
Class R-6 -- actual return† | 1,000.00 | 1,028.54 | .85 | .38 | ||||||||||||
Class R-6 -- assumed 5% return† | 1,000.00 | 1,022.97 | 1.91 | .38 | ||||||||||||
*The “expenses paid during period” are equal to the “annualized expense ratio,” multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, and divided by 366 (to reflect the one-half year period). | ||||||||||||||||
†The period for the “annualized expense ratio” and “actual return” line is based on the number of days since the initial sale of the share class on May 11, 2012. The "assumed 5% return" line is based on 182 days. |
Approval of Investment Advisory and Service Agreement
The fund’s board has approved the fund’s Investment Advisory and Service Agreement (the “agreement”) with Capital Research and Management Company (“CRMC”) for an additional one-year term through March 31, 2013. The board approved the agreement following the recommendation of the fund’s Contracts Committee (the “committee”), which is composed of all of the fund’s independent board members. The board and the committee determined that the fund’s advisory fee structure was fair and reasonable in relation to the services provided and that approving the agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
In reaching this decision, the board and the committee took into account information furnished to them throughout the year, as well as information prepared specifically in connection with their review of the agreement, and were advised by their independent counsel. They considered the factors discussed below, among others, but did not identify any single issue or particular piece of information that, in isolation, was the controlling factor.
1. Nature, extent and quality of services
The board and the committee considered the depth and quality of CRMC’s investment management process, including its global research capabilities; the experience, capability and integrity of its senior management and other personnel; the low turnover rates of its key personnel; the overall financial strength and stability of its organization; and the ongoing evolution of CRMC’s organizational structure designed to maintain and strengthen these qualities. The board and the committee also considered the nature, extent and quality of administrative, compliance and shareholder services provided by CRMC to the fund under the agreement and other agreements as well as the benefits to fund shareholders from investing in a fund that is part of a large family of funds. The board and the committee concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by CRMC have benefited and should continue to benefit the fund and its shareholders.
2. Investment results
The board and the committee considered the investment results of the fund in light of its objective of providing high current income exempt from regular federal income tax. They compared the fund’s total returns with those of other relevant funds (including the other funds that are the basis of the Lipper index for the category in which the fund is included) and market data such as relevant market indices, in each case as available at the time of the related board and committee meetings. This report, including the letter to shareholders and related disclosures, contains certain information about the fund’s investment results. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s results have been satisfactory and that CRMC’s record in managing the fund indicated that its continued management should benefit the fund and its shareholders.
3. Advisory fees and total expenses
The board and the committee compared the advisory fees and total expense levels of the fund to those of other relevant funds. They observed that the fund’s advisory fees and expenses remain significantly below those of most other relevant funds. The board and the committee also noted the breakpoint discounts in the fund’s advisory fee structure that reduce the level of fees charged by CRMC to the fund as fund assets increase. In addition, they reviewed information regarding the advisory fees paid by clients of an affiliate of CRMC. They noted that, to the extent there were differences between the advisory fees paid by the fund and the advisory fees paid by those clients, the differences appropriately reflected the investment, operational and regulatory differences between advising the fund and the other clients. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s cost structure was fair and reasonable in relation to the services provided, and that the shareholders receive reasonable value in return for the advisory fees and other amounts paid to CRMC by the fund.
4. Ancillary benefits
The board and the committee considered a variety of other benefits received by CRMC and its affiliates as a result of CRMC’s relationship with the fund and the other American Funds, including fees for administrative services provided to certain share classes; fees paid to CRMC’s affiliated transfer agent; sales charges and distribution fees received and retained by the fund’s principal underwriter, an affiliate of CRMC; and possible ancillary benefits to CRMC’s institutional management affiliates. The board and the committee reviewed CRMC’s portfolio trading practices, noting that while CRMC receives the benefit of research provided by broker-dealers executing portfolio transactions on behalf of the fund, it does not obtain third-party research or other services in return for allocating brokerage to such broker-dealers. The board and the committee took these ancillary benefits into account in evaluating the reasonableness of the advisory fees and other amounts paid to CRMC by the fund.
5. Adviser financial information
The board and the committee reviewed information regarding CRMC’s costs of providing services to the American Funds, including personnel, systems and resources of investment, compliance, trading, accounting and other administrative operations. They considered CRMC’s costs and willingness to invest in technology, infrastructure and staff to maintain and expand services and capabilities, respond to industry and regulatory developments, and attract and retain qualified personnel. They noted information regarding the compensation structure for CRMC’s investment professionals. The board and the committee also compared CRMC’s profitability to the reported results of several large, publicly held investment management companies. The board and the committee noted the competitiveness and cyclicality of both the mutual fund industry and the capital markets, and the importance in that environment of CRMC’s long-term profitability for maintaining its independence, company culture and management continuity. They further considered the breakpoint discounts in the fund’s advisory fee structure. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s advisory fee structure reflected a reasonable sharing of benefits between CRMC and the fund’s shareholders.
Tax information
unaudited
We are required to advise you of the federal tax status of certain distributions received by shareholders during the fiscal year. The fund hereby designates the following amount for the fund’s fiscal year ended
July 31, 2012:
Exempt interest dividends | 100 | % |
Individual shareholders should refer to their Form 1099 or other tax information, which will be mailed in January 2013, to determine the calendar year amounts to be included on their 2012 tax returns. Shareholders should consult their tax advisers.
Board of trustees and other officers
“Independent” trustees1 | ||
Year first | ||
elected a | ||
trustee of | ||
Name and age | the fund2 | Principal occupation(s) during past five years |
William H. Baribault, 67 | 2010 | Chairman of the Board and CEO, Oakwood |
Enterprises (private investment and consulting) | ||
James G. Ellis, 65 | 2006 | Dean and Professor of Marketing, Marshall School of |
Business, University of Southern California | ||
Leonard R. Fuller, 66 | 1994 | President and CEO, Fuller Consulting (financial |
management consulting firm) | ||
W. Scott Hedrick, 67 | 2010 | Founding General Partner, InterWest Partners |
(venture capital firm) | ||
R. Clark Hooper, 66 | 2005 | Private investor |
Chairman of the Board | ||
(Independent and Non-Executive) | ||
Merit E. Janow, 54 | 2010 | Professor, Columbia University, School of |
International and Public Affairs; former Member, | ||
World Trade Organization Appellate Body | ||
Laurel B. Mitchell, Ph.D., 57 | 2010 | Clinical Professor and Director, Accounting Program, |
University of Redlands | ||
Frank M. Sanchez, 68 | 1999 | Principal, The Sanchez Family Corporation dba |
McDonald’s Restaurants (McDonald’s licensee) | ||
Margaret Spellings, 54 | 2010 | President and CEO, Margaret Spellings & Company |
(public policy and strategic consulting); President, | ||
U.S. Forum for Policy Innovation and Senior Advisor | ||
to the President and CEO, U.S. Chamber of | ||
Commerce; former United States Secretary of | ||
Education, United States Department of Education | ||
Steadman Upham, Ph.D., 63 | 2007 | President Emeritus and University Professor, |
The University of Tulsa | ||
“Independent” trustees1 | ||
Number of | ||
portfolios | ||
in fund | ||
complex3 | ||
overseen by | ||
Name and age | trustee | Other directorships4 held by trustee |
William H. Baribault, 67 | 58 | None |
James G. Ellis, 65 | 62 | Quiksilver, Inc. |
Leonard R. Fuller, 66 | 62 | None |
W. Scott Hedrick, 67 | 58 | Hot Topic, Inc.; Office Depot, Inc. |
R. Clark Hooper, 66 | 64 | JPMorgan Value Opportunities Fund, Inc.; |
Chairman of the Board | The Swiss Helvetia Fund, Inc. | |
(Independent and Non-Executive) | ||
Merit E. Janow, 54 | 61 | The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; |
Trimble Navigation Limited | ||
Laurel B. Mitchell, Ph.D., 57 | 58 | None |
Frank M. Sanchez, 68 | 58 | None |
Margaret Spellings, 54 | 61 | None |
Steadman Upham, Ph.D., 63 | 61 | None |
Lee A. Ault III, a trustee of the fund since 2010, and Martin Fenton, a trustee of the fund since 1994, have retired from the board. The trustees thank Mr. Ault and Mr. Fenton for their dedication and service to the fund.
“Interested” trustee5 | ||
Year first | ||
elected a | ||
trustee or | Principal occupation(s) during past five years | |
Name, age and | officer of | and positions held with affiliated entities or the |
position with fund | the fund2 | principal underwriter of the fund |
Karl J. Zeile, 45 | 2008 | Senior Vice President — Fixed Income, Capital |
President | Research and Management Company; Vice | |
President, Capital Guardian Trust Company6 | ||
“Interested” trustee5 | ||
Number of | ||
portfolios in | ||
fund complex3 | ||
Name, age and | overseen | |
position with fund | by trustee | Other directorships4 held by trustee |
Karl J. Zeile, 45 | 6 | None |
President |
The fund’s statement of additional information includes further details about fund trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling American Funds Service Company at 800/421-4225 or by visiting the American Funds website at americanfunds.com. The address for all trustees and officers of the fund is 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071, Attention: Secretary.
See page 32 for footnotes.
Other officers | ||
Year first | ||
elected | Principal occupation(s) during past five years | |
Name, age and | an officer | and positions held with affiliated entities or the |
position with fund | of the fund2 | principal underwriter of the fund |
Neil L. Langberg, 59 | 1994 | Senior Vice President — Fixed Income, Capital |
Senior Vice President | Research and Management Company; Vice President, Capital Guardian Trust Company6 | |
Kristine M. Nishiyama, 42 | 2003 | Senior Vice President and Senior Counsel — Fund |
Senior Vice President | Business Management Group, Capital Research and | |
Management Company; Vice President and Senior | ||
Counsel, Capital Bank and Trust Company6 | ||
Brenda S. Ellerin, 49 | 2001 | Senior Vice President — Fixed Income, Capital |
Vice President | Research and Management Company | |
Courtney R. Taylor, 37 | 2006 | Assistant Vice President — Fund Business |
Secretary | Management Group, Capital Research and | |
Management Company | ||
Dori Laskin, 61 | 2010 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Treasurer | Group, Capital Research and Management Company | |
Steven I. Koszalka, 48 | 2010 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Assistant Secretary | Group, Capital Research and Management Company | |
Karl C. Grauman, 44 | 2012 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Assistant Treasurer | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
1The term “independent” trustee refers to a trustee who is not an “interested person” of the fund within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940. |
2Trustees and officers of the fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement. |
3Capital Research and Management Company manages the American Funds. Capital Research and Management Company also manages American Funds Insurance Series,® which is composed of 19 funds and serves as the underlying investment vehicle for certain variable insurance contracts; American Funds Target Date Retirement Series,® which is composed of 10 funds and is available through tax-deferred retirement plans and IRAs; American Funds Portfolio Series,SM which is composed of eight funds; and American Funds College Target Date Series,SM which is composed of seven funds. |
4This includes all directorships (other than those in the American Funds or other funds managed by Capital Research and Management Company) that are held by each trustee as a trustee or director of a public company or a registered investment company. |
5“Interested persons” within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, on the basis of their affiliation with the fund’s investment adviser, Capital Research and Management Company, or affiliated entities (including the fund’s principal underwriter). |
6Company affiliated with Capital Research and Management Company. |
Offices
Offices of the fund and of the investment adviser
Capital Research and Management Company
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
6455 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA 92618
Transfer agent for shareholder accounts
American Funds Service Company
(Write to the address near you.)
P.O. Box 6007
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6007
P.O. Box 2280
Norfolk, VA 23501-2280
Custodian of assets
JPMorgan Chase Bank
270 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017-2070
Counsel
Bingham McCutchen LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 4400
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3106
Independent registered public accounting firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
350 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2889
Principal underwriter
American Funds Distributors, Inc.
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the fund prospectus and summary prospectus, which can be obtained from your financial professional and should be read carefully before investing. You may also call American Funds Service Company (AFS) at 800/421-4225 or visit the American Funds website at americanfunds.com.
“American Funds Proxy Voting Procedures and Principles” — which describes how we vote proxies relating to portfolio securities — is available on the American Funds website or upon request by calling AFS. The fund files its proxy voting record with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the 12 months ended June 30 by August 31. The proxy voting record is available free of charge on the SEC website at sec.gov and on the American Funds website.
A complete July 31, 2012, portfolio of American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund’s investments is available free of charge by calling AFS or visiting the SEC website (where it is part of Form N-CSR).
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund files a complete list of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. This filing is available free of charge on the SEC website. You may also review or, for a fee, copy this filing at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Additional information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy at 800/SEC-0330. Additionally, the list of portfolio holdings is available by calling AFS.
This report is for the information of shareholders of American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund, but it also may be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus or summary prospectus, which gives details about charges, expenses, investment objectives and operating policies of the fund. If used as sales material after September 30, 2012, this report must be accompanied by an American Funds statistical update for the most recently completed calendar quarter.
The American Funds difference
Since 1931, American Funds has helped investors pursue long-term investment success. Our consistent approach — in combination with a proven system — has resulted in a superior long-term track record.
Consistent approach
We base our decisions on a long-term perspective because we believe it is the best way to achieve superior long-term investment results. Our portfolio counselors average 25 years of investment experience, including 21 years at our company, reflecting a career commitment to our long-term approach.1
Proven system
Our system combines individual accountability with teamwork. Each fund is divided into portions that are managed by investment professionals with varied backgrounds, ages and investment styles. An extensive global research effort is the backbone of our system.
Superior long-term track record
Our equity funds have beaten their Lipper peer indexes in 91% of 10-year periods and 96% of 20-year periods. Our fixed-income funds have beaten their Lipper indexes in 60% of 10-year periods and 67% of 20-year periods.2 Our fund management fees have been among the lowest in the industry.3
1As of 12/31/11. |
2Based on Class A share results for periods through 12/31/11. Periods covered are the shorter of the fund’s lifetime or since the comparable Lipper index inception date. |
3Based on management fees for the 20-year period ended 12/31/11 versus comparable Lipper categories, excluding funds of funds. |
American Funds span a range of investment objectives
•Growth funds |
AMCAP Fund® |
EuroPacific Growth Fund® |
The Growth Fund of America® |
The New Economy Fund® |
New Perspective Fund® |
New World Fund® |
SMALLCAP World Fund® |
•Growth-and-income funds |
American Mutual Fund® |
Capital World Growth and Income Fund® |
Fundamental InvestorsSM |
International Growth and Income FundSM |
The Investment Company of America® |
Washington Mutual Investors FundSM |
•Equity-income funds |
Capital Income Builder® |
The Income Fund of America® |
•Balanced funds |
American Balanced Fund® |
American Funds Global Balanced FundSM |
•Bond funds |
American Funds Mortgage Fund® |
American High-Income Trust® |
The Bond Fund of America® |
Capital World Bond Fund® |
Intermediate Bond Fund of America® |
Short-Term Bond Fund of America®
U.S. Government Securities Fund® |
•Tax-exempt bond funds |
American Funds Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund® |
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund® |
Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America® |
The Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America® |
State-specific tax-exempt funds |
American Funds Tax-Exempt Fund of New York® |
The Tax-Exempt Fund of California® |
The Tax-Exempt Fund of Maryland® |
The Tax-Exempt Fund of Virginia® |
•Money market fund |
American Funds Money Market Fund®
•American Funds Portfolio SeriesSM |
American Funds Global Growth PortfolioSM
American Funds Growth PortfolioSM |
American Funds Growth and Income PortfolioSM |
American Funds Balanced PortfolioSM |
American Funds Income PortfolioSM |
American Funds Tax-Advantaged Income PortfolioSM |
American Funds Preservation PortfolioSM |
American Funds Tax-Exempt Preservation PortfolioSM |
•American Funds Target Date Retirement Series® |
•American Funds College Target Date SeriesSM |
The Capital Group Companies
American Funds Capital Research and Management Capital International Capital Guardian Capital Bank and Trust
Lit No. MFGEAR-940-0912P
Litho in USA WG/L/6376-S33535
Printed on paper containing 10% post-consumer waste
Printed with inks containing soy and/or vegetable oil
ITEM 2 – Code of Ethics
The Registrant has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. The Registrant undertakes to provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of the Code of Ethics. Such request can be made to American Funds Service Company at 800/421-0180 or to the Secretary of the Registrant, 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California 90071.
ITEM 3 – Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Registrant’s board has determined that Laurel B. Mitchell, a member of the Registrant’s audit committee, is an “audit committee financial expert” and "independent," as such terms are defined in this Item. This designation will not increase the designee’s duties, obligations or liability as compared to his or her duties, obligations and liability as a member of the audit committee and of the board, nor will it reduce the responsibility of the other audit committee members. There may be other individuals who, through education or experience, would qualify as "audit committee financial experts" if the board had designated them as such. Most importantly, the board believes each member of the audit committee contributes significantly to the effective oversight of the Registrant’s financial statements and condition.
ITEM 4 – Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Registrant: | ||||
a) Audit Fees: | ||||
2011 | $50,000 | |||
2012 | $53,000 | |||
b) Audit-Related Fees: | ||||
2011 | None | |||
2012 | None | |||
c) Tax Fees: | ||||
2011 | $7,000 | |||
2012 | $7,000 | |||
The tax fees consist of professional services relating to the preparation of the Registrant’s tax returns. | ||||
d) All Other Fees: | ||||
2011 | None | |||
2012 | None | |||
Adviser and affiliates (includes only fees for non-audit services billed to the adviser and affiliates for engagements that relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant and were subject to the pre-approval policies described below): | ||||
a) Audit Fees: | ||||
Not Applicable | ||||
b) Audit-Related Fees: | ||||
2011 | None | |||
2012 | None | |||
c) Tax Fees: | ||||
2011 | $14,000 | |||
2012 | $45,000 | |||
The tax fees consist of consulting services relating to the Registrant’s investments. | ||||
d) All Other Fees: | ||||
2011 | $2,000 | |||
2012 | $2,000 | |||
The other fees consist of subscription services related to an accounting research tool. |
All audit and permissible non-audit services that the Registrant’s audit committee considers compatible with maintaining the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence are required to be pre-approved by the committee. The pre-approval requirement will extend to all non-audit services provided to the Registrant, the investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant. The committee will not delegate its responsibility to pre-approve these services to the investment adviser. The committee may delegate to one or more committee members the authority to review and pre-approve audit and permissible non-audit services. Actions taken under any such delegation will be reported to the full committee at its next meeting. The pre-approval requirement is waived with respect to non-audit services if certain conditions are met. The pre-approval requirement was not waived for any of the non-audit services listed above provided to the Registrant, adviser and affiliates.
Aggregate non-audit fees paid to the Registrant’s auditors, including fees for all services billed to the Registrant, adviser and affiliates that provide ongoing services to the Registrant, were $22,000 for fiscal year 2011 and $54,000 for fiscal year 2012. The non-audit services represented by these amounts were brought to the attention of the committee and considered to be compatible with maintaining the auditors’ independence.
ITEM 5 – Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable to this Registrant, insofar as the Registrant is not a listed issuer as defined in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
ITEM 6 – Schedule of Investments
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund®
Investment portfolio
July 31, 2012
Bonds & notes — 94.29% | Principal amount (000) | Value (000) | ||||||
ALABAMA — 0.18% | ||||||||
Industrial Dev. Board of the City of Phenix City, Environmental Improvement Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(MeadWestvaco-Mead Coated Board Project), Series 2002-A, AMT, 6.35% 2035 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 1,515 | ||||
Special Care Facs. Fncg. Auth. of the City of Pell City, Rev. Ref. Bonds (Noland Health Services, Inc.), | ||||||||
Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2039 | 3,300 | 3,532 | ||||||
5,047 | ||||||||
ALASKA — 0.01% | ||||||||
Housing Fin. Corp., Home Mortgage Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-C, AMT, National insured, 5.50% 2037 | 345 | 353 | ||||||
ARIZONA — 3.38% | ||||||||
Certs. of Part., Series 2010-A, Assured Guaranty Municipal insured, 5.25% 2025 | 2,500 | 2,926 | ||||||
Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facs. Dist. (City of Goodyear), Special Assessment Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Montecito Assessment Dist.), Series 2007, 5.70% 2027 | 456 | 448 | ||||||
Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facs. Dist. (City of Goodyear), Special Assessment Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Montecito Assessment Dist.), Series 2007, 5.80% 2032 | 966 | 931 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Health Care Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Beatitudes Campus Project), Series 2006, 5.10% 20221 | 2,000 | 1,920 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Health Care Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Beatitudes Campus Project), Series 2006, 5.20% 20371 | 6,000 | 5,153 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Hospital Rev. Bonds (Phoenix Children’s Hospital), Series 2007-A, 1.15% 2042 (put 2015)2 | 1,000 | 970 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Hospital Rev. Bonds (Phoenix Children’s Hospital), Series 2007-B, 1.00% 2042 (put 2015)2 | 5,000 | 4,866 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Banner Health), Series 2007-B, 1.119% 20372 | 5,000 | 3,631 | ||||||
City of Phoenix Civic Improvement Corp., Airport Rev. Bonds, Series 2008-B, AMT, 5.25% 2019 | 2,000 | 2,325 | ||||||
City of Phoenix Civic Improvement Corp., Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2008-D, AMT, 5.00% 2020 | 2,000 | 2,272 | ||||||
Industrial Dev. Auth. of the City of Phoenix and the County of Pima, Single-family Mortgage Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2006-3A, AMT, 5.25% 2038 | 1,695 | 1,781 | ||||||
Industrial Dev. of the City of Phoenix, Lease Rev. Bonds (Rowan University Project), Series 2012, 5.00% 2042 | 10,410 | 11,122 | ||||||
Industrial Dev. of the City of Phoenix, Lease Rev. Bonds (Rowan University Project), Series 2012, 5.25% 2034 | 5,000 | 5,514 | ||||||
Industrial Dev. Auth. of the County of Pima, Water and Wastewater Rev. Bonds (Global Water Resources, LLC Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007, AMT, 6.55% 2037 | 17,000 | 17,794 | ||||||
Industrial Dev. Auth. of the County of Pima, Water and Wastewater Rev. Bonds (Global Water Resources, LLC Project), | ||||||||
Series 2008, AMT, 7.50% 2038 | 10,000 | 10,962 | ||||||
Industrial Dev. Authorities of the County of Pima and the City of Tucson, Joint Single-family Mortgage Rev. Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2007-A-1, AMT, 5.10% 2038 | 1,105 | 1,177 | ||||||
Quail Creek Community Facs. Dist. (Sahuarita), G.O. Bonds, Series 2006, 5.55% 2030 | 4,520 | 4,232 | ||||||
Town of Queen Creek, Improvement Dist. No. 001, Improvement Bonds, 5.00% 2032 | 3,000 | 3,021 | ||||||
School Facs. Board, State School Trust Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2007, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2017 | 2,500 | 2,797 | ||||||
Industrial Dev. Auth. of the City of Scottsdale, Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Scottsdale Healthcare), | ||||||||
Series 2006-C, Assured Guaranty Municipal insured, 5.00% 2035 | 1,250 | 1,383 | ||||||
State Lottery Rev. Bonds, Series 2010-A, Assured Guaranty Municipal insured, 5.00% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,151 | ||||||
Industrial Dev. Auth. of the City of Tempe, Rev. Ref. Bonds (Friendship Village of Tempe), Series 2012-A, 6.25% 2046 | 1,600 | 1,727 | ||||||
University Medical Center Corp. (Tucson), Hospital Rev. Bonds, Series 2009, 6.50% 2039 | 1,000 | 1,161 | ||||||
Vistancia Community Facs. Dist. (Peoria), G.O. Bonds, Series 2006, 4.55% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,033 | ||||||
Westpark Community Facs. Dist., Dist. G.O. Bonds (Town of Buckeye), Series 2006, 5.25% 2031 | 725 | 658 | ||||||
Industrial Dev. Auth. of the County of Yavapai, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. Bonds (Waste Management, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2003-A-1, AMT, 4.90% 2028 | 2,200 | 2,313 | ||||||
93,268 | ||||||||
CALIFORNIA — 13.26% | ||||||||
City of Alhambra, Rev. Bonds (Atherton Baptist Homes Project), Series 2010-A, 7.50% 2030 | 2,615 | 2,913 | ||||||
City of Alhambra, Rev. Bonds (Atherton Baptist Homes Project), Series 2010-A, 7.625% 2040 | 1,685 | 1,871 | ||||||
Antelope Valley Healthcare Dist., Rev. Bonds, Series 2002-A, 5.25% 2017 | 3,500 | 3,573 | ||||||
City of Azusa, Community Facs. Dist. No. 2005-1 (Rosedale), Improvement Area No. 1, Special Tax Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.00% 2020 | 985 | 1,004 | ||||||
City of Azusa, Community Facs. Dist. No. 2005-1 (Rosedale), Improvement Area No. 1, Special Tax Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.00% 2037 | 3,920 | 3,503 | ||||||
Assn. of Bay Area Governments, Fin. Auth. for Nonprofit Corps., Insured Rev. Ref. Bonds (Casa de las Campanas, Inc.), | ||||||||
Series 2010, 6.00% 2037 | 500 | 569 | ||||||
Assn. of Bay Area Governments, Fin. Auth. for Nonprofit Corps., Insured Rev. Ref. Bonds (Channing House), | ||||||||
Series 2010, 6.00% 2030 | 1,000 | 1,122 | ||||||
Assn. of Bay Area Governments, Fin. Auth. for Nonprofit Corps., Rev. Bonds (San Diego Hospital Assn.), | ||||||||
Series 2003-C, 5.375% 2021 | 1,500 | 1,581 | ||||||
Assn. of Bay Area Governments, Fin. Auth. for Nonprofit Corps., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Episcopal Senior Communities), | ||||||||
Series 2011, 6.00% 2031 | 1,250 | 1,406 | ||||||
Assn. of Bay Area Governments, Fin. Auth. for Nonprofit Corps., Southern California Presbyterian Homes Obligated Group, | ||||||||
Rev. Ref. Bonds (Redwood Senior Homes and Services), Series 2002, 6.125% 2032 | 1,000 | 1,013 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Senior Living Rev. Ref. Bonds (Southern California Presbyterian Homes), | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, 4.875% 2036 | 1,000 | 1,001 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Senior Living Rev. Ref. Bonds (Southern California Presbyterian Homes), | ||||||||
Series 2009, 7.00% 2029 | 1,500 | 1,715 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Senior Living Rev. Ref. Bonds (Southern California Presbyterian Homes), | ||||||||
Series 2009, 7.25% 2041 | 4,500 | 5,137 | ||||||
Bonita Canyon Public Facs. Fncg. Auth., Community Facs. Dist. No. 98-1, Special Tax Bonds, Series 2012, 4.25% 2023 | 1,000 | 1,030 | ||||||
Bonita Canyon Public Facs. Fncg. Auth., Community Facs. Dist. No. 98-1, Special Tax Bonds, Series 2012, 5.00% 2028 | 1,000 | 1,031 | ||||||
California County Tobacco Securitization Agcy., Tobacco Settlement Asset-backed Bonds | ||||||||
(Alameda County Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.), Series 2002, 4.75% 2019 | 135 | 135 | ||||||
Cathedral City Public Fncg. Auth., Tax Allocation Rev. Bonds (Cathedral City 2006 Merged Redev. Project Area), | ||||||||
Series 2007-C, 5.00% 2025 | 1,165 | 974 | ||||||
Cerritos Community College Dist. (Los Angeles County), Election of 2004, G.O. Bonds, Series 2012-D, 0% 2035 | 1,000 | 321 | ||||||
Cerritos Community College Dist. (Los Angeles County), Election of 2004, G.O. Bonds, Series 2012-D, 0% 2036 | 1,200 | 365 | ||||||
Cerritos Public Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Los Coyotes Redev. Project Loan), Series A, AMBAC insured, 6.50% 2023 | 955 | 1,112 | ||||||
Cerritos Public Fin. Auth., Tax Allocation Rev. Bonds (Cerritos Redev. Projects), | ||||||||
Series 2002-A, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2020 | 4,165 | 4,550 | ||||||
Cerritos Public Fin. Auth., Tax Allocation Rev. Bonds (Cerritos Redev. Projects), | ||||||||
Series 2002-A, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2021 | 1,000 | 1,084 | ||||||
Cerritos Public Fncg. Auth., 2002 Tax Allocation Rev. Bonds (Cerritos Redev. Agcy.), | ||||||||
Series A, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2022 | 2,000 | 2,153 | ||||||
Certs. of Part., Palomar Pomerado Health, 6.00% 2030 | 2,500 | 2,726 | ||||||
Certs. of Part., Palomar Pomerado Health, 6.00% 2041 | 2,290 | 2,457 | ||||||
Certs. of Part., Palomar Pomerado Health, 6.75% 2039 | 1,500 | 1,679 | ||||||
City of Chula Vista, Industrial Dev. Rev. Ref. Bonds (San Diego Gas & Electric Co.), Series 2004-C, 5.875% 2034 | 1,100 | 1,293 | ||||||
Community Facs. Dist. No. 2002-1, City of Corona (Dos Lagos), Special Tax Bonds (Improvement Area No. 1), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.00% 2037 | 500 | 453 | ||||||
Community Facs. Dist. No. 2002-1, City of Corona (Dos Lagos), Special Tax Bonds, Series 2005-A, 4.90% 2025 | 1,195 | 1,173 | ||||||
Del Mar Race Track Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2005, 5.00% 2015 | 995 | 1,057 | ||||||
Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (University of San Francisco), Series 2011, 6.125% 2036 | 1,000 | 1,226 | ||||||
County of El Dorado, Community Facs. Dist. No. 1992-1 (El Dorado Hills Dev.), Special Tax Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 1999, 6.125% 2016 | 745 | 747 | ||||||
Various Purpose G.O. Bonds, 5.00% 2041 | 1,500 | 1,639 | ||||||
Various Purpose G.O. Bonds, 5.00% 2041 | 3,750 | 4,100 | ||||||
Various Purpose G.O. Ref. Bonds, 5.00% 2031 | 2,000 | 2,274 | ||||||
Various Purpose G.O. Ref. Bonds, 5.00% 2032 | 2,000 | 2,267 | ||||||
Various Purpose G.O. Ref. Bonds, 5.00% 2038 | 2,000 | 2,197 | ||||||
Veterans G.O. Bonds, Series CD, AMT, 4.60% 2032 | 9,750 | 9,930 | ||||||
Health Facs. Fncg. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Episcopal Home), Series 2002-B, 6.00% 2032 | 1,000 | 1,128 | ||||||
Health Facs. Fncg. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Sutter Health), Series 2011-D, 5.25% 2031 | 1,000 | 1,150 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Sutter Health), Series 2011-A, 6.00% 2042 | 1,500 | 1,804 | ||||||
West Hollywood Community Dev. Commission, Tax Allocation Bonds (East Side Redev. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2011-A, 7.50% 2042 | 1,950 | 2,235 | ||||||
City of Irvine, Impt Bd Act 1915 Dist. No. 11-1, Limited Obligation Reassessment, 4.875% 2025 | 1,025 | 1,057 | ||||||
City of Irvine, Impt Bd Act 1915 Dist. No. 11-1, Limited Obligation Reassessment, 5.00% 2026 | 1,075 | 1,108 | ||||||
Irvine Public Facs. and Infrastructure Auth., Assessment Rev. Bonds, Series 2012-A, 4.50% 2025 | 650 | 670 | ||||||
City of La Verne, Rev. Certs. of Part. (Brethren Hillcrest Homes), Series 2003-A, ACA insured, 5.60% 2033 | 1,750 | 1,762 | ||||||
City of La Verne, Rev. Certs. of Part. (Brethren Hillcrest Homes), Series 2003-B, 6.625% 2025 | 2,185 | 2,226 | ||||||
Lee Lake Water Dist., Community Facs. Dist. No. 1 (Sycamore Creek), Special Tax Bonds, Series 2003, 6.00% 2033 | 1,000 | 1,032 | ||||||
City of Long Beach, Harbor Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 1998-A, AMT, FGIC-National insured, 6.00% 2019 | 3,600 | 4,537 | ||||||
Dept. of Airports of the City of Los Angeles, Ontario International Airport, Rev. Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, AMT, National insured, 5.00% 2023 | 2,430 | 2,653 | ||||||
M-S-R Energy Auth., Gas Rev. Bonds, Series 2009-B, 6.50% 2039 | 5,900 | 7,477 | ||||||
City of Moorpark, Community Facs. Dist. No 2004-1, Special Tax Bonds (Moorpark Highlands), Series 2006, 5.25% 2026 | 670 | 689 | ||||||
City of Moorpark, Community Facs. Dist. No 2004-1, Special Tax Bonds (Moorpark Highlands), Series 2006, 5.30% 2038 | 1,865 | 1,882 | ||||||
Community Facs. Dist. No. 2004-6, Moreno Valley Unified School Dist., Special Tax Bonds, Series 2005, 5.20% 2036 | 2,850 | 2,888 | ||||||
Community Redev. Agcy. of the City of Moreno Valley, Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2007-A, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2038 | 6,270 | 6,357 | ||||||
Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Enterprise Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2008-B, 5.50% 2018 | 3,505 | 3,558 | ||||||
Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Enterprise Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2008-B, 6.50% 2028 | 8,250 | 8,617 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Certs. of Part. (Community Hospitals of Central California Obligated Group), 5.00% 2020 | 1,500 | 1,661 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Certs. of Part. (Community Hospitals of Central California Obligated Group), 5.00% 2021 | 1,500 | 1,630 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Certs. of Part. (Community Hospitals of Central California Obligated Group), 5.25% 2037 | 2,000 | 2,065 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Education Rev. Ref. Bonds (American Heritage Education Foundation Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, 5.25% 2036 | 2,100 | 1,897 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Educational Fac. Rev. Bonds (High Tech High Projects, Chula Vista), Series 2008-B, 6.00% 20281 | 845 | 868 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Educational Fac. Rev. Bonds (High Tech High Projects, Chula Vista), Series 2008-B, 6.125% 20381 | 750 | 766 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Educational Fac. Rev. Bonds (High Tech High Projects, Chula Vista), Series 2008-B, 6.125% 20481 | 1,000 | 1,017 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Harbor Regional Center Project), Series 2009, 8.00% 2029 | 1,420 | 1,700 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Harbor Regional Center Project), Series 2009, 8.50% 2039 | 2,000 | 2,416 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (University of La Verne), Series 2010-A, 6.25% 2040 | 1,000 | 1,125 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (University Students’ Cooperative Assn.), Series 2007, 4.75% 2027 | 1,600 | 1,627 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (University Students’ Cooperative Assn.), Series 2007, 5.00% 2037 | 1,000 | 1,013 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Azusa Pacific University Project), Series 2011-B, 8.00% 20411 | 7,500 | 8,778 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Biola University), Series 2008-A, 5.80% 2028 | 500 | 547 | ||||||
Municipal Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Biola University), Series 2008-A, 5.875% 2034 | 1,500 | 1,622 | ||||||
Murrieta Public Fncg. Auth., Special Tax Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012, 4.00% 2034 | 1,465 | 1,410 | ||||||
Murrieta Public Fncg. Auth., Special Tax Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012, 5.00% 2031 | 800 | 865 | ||||||
Newport-Mesa Unified School Dist. (County of Orange), G.O. Bonds, Election of 2005, Series 2011, 0% 2038 | 4,000 | 1,227 | ||||||
City of Norco, Community Facs. Dist. No. 2001-1 (Norco Ridge Ranch), Special Tax Ref. Bonds, Issue of 2006, | ||||||||
AMBAC insured, 4.875% 2033 | 7,000 | 6,763 | ||||||
Port of Oakland, Rev. Bonds, Series M, AMT, FGIC-National insured, 5.375% 2027 | 1,775 | 1,789 | ||||||
Port of Oakland, Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-O, AMT, 5.00% 2029 | 2,000 | 2,149 | ||||||
Port of Oakland, Rev. Bonds, Series M, AMT, FGIC-National insured, 5.375% 2027 (preref. 2012) | 225 | 228 | ||||||
Community Facs. Dist. No. 3 (Seabridge at Mandalay Bay) of the City of Oxnard, Special Tax Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2005, 5.00% 2035 | 1,550 | 1,569 | ||||||
Community Facs. Dist. No. 3 (Seabridge at Mandalay Bay) of the City of Oxnard, Special Tax Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2005, 5.125% 2025 | 2,515 | 2,568 | ||||||
City of Palm Desert, Section 29 Assessment Dist. (No. 2004-02), Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.05% 2027 | 2,000 | 1,798 | ||||||
City of Pasadena, Certs. of Part. (Conference Center Project, Capital Appreciation Certificates), | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, AMBAC insured, 0% 2020 | 4,815 | 3,864 | ||||||
City of Pasadena, Certs. of Part. (Conference Center Project, Capital Appreciation Certificates), | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, AMBAC insured, 0% 2021 | 4,145 | 3,193 | ||||||
Perris Union High School Dist., Fncg. Auth., Rev. Bonds, Series 2011, 6.125% 2041 | 1,000 | 1,031 | ||||||
Pollution Control Fncg. Auth., Pollution Control Rev. Ref. Bonds (Pacific Gas and Electric Co.), | ||||||||
Series 2004-A, AMT, FGIC insured, 4.75% 2023 | 1,500 | 1,634 | ||||||
Pollution Control Fncg. Auth., Pollution Control Rev. Ref. Bonds (Pacific Gas and Electric Co.), | ||||||||
Series 2004-C, AMT, AMBAC-FGIC insured, 4.75% 2023 | 1,000 | 1,089 | ||||||
Poway Unified School Dist., Capital Appreciation School Facs. Improvement, G.O., 0% 2046 | 5,000 | 896 | ||||||
Poway Unified School Dist., Public Fncg. Auth., Special Tax Rev. Ref. Bonds, 5.25% 2029 | 2,315 | 2,387 | ||||||
Poway Unified School Dist., Public Fncg. Auth., Special Tax Rev. Ref. Bonds, 5.50% 2033 | 1,500 | 1,547 | ||||||
Public Works Board, Lease Rev. Bonds (Trustees of the California State University, J. Paul Leonard & Sutro Library), | ||||||||
Series 2009-J, 6.00% 2034 | 1,500 | 1,785 | ||||||
Public Works Board, Lease Rev. Bonds (Trustees of the California State University, | ||||||||
Various California State University Projects), Series 2011-B, 5.00% 2031 | 1,200 | 1,298 | ||||||
Public Works Board, Lease Rev. Bonds (Various Capital Projects), Series 2009-I-1, 6.125% 2029 | 6,000 | 7,194 | ||||||
Public Works Board, Lease Rev. Bonds (Various Capital Projects), Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2033 | 1,500 | 1,640 | ||||||
Public Works Board, Lease Rev. Bonds (Various Capital Projects), Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2037 | 2,500 | 2,708 | ||||||
Community Facs. Dist. No. 15 (Mission Ranch) of Riverside Unified School Dist., Special Tax Bonds | ||||||||
(Improvement Area No. 2), Series 2005-A, 5.25% 2035 | 1,200 | 1,219 | ||||||
County of Riverside Community Facs. Dist. No. 04-2 (Lake Hills Crest), Special Tax Bonds, Series 2005, 5.00% 2025 | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||||||
Sacramento County Water Fncg. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Sacramento County Water Agcy. Zones 40 and 41 | ||||||||
2007 Water System Project), Series 2007-B, FGIC-National insured, 0.863% 20342 | 5,000 | 3,561 | ||||||
County of San Bernardino, Certs. of Part. (Arrowhead Ref. Project), Series 2009-A, 5.00% 2022 | 1,000 | 1,085 | ||||||
County of San Bernardino, Certs. of Part. (Arrowhead Ref. Project), Series 2009-A, 5.125% 2024 | 3,000 | 3,221 | ||||||
San Bernardino Joint Powers Fncg. Auth., 2002 Tax Allocation Rev. Ref. Bonds, 6.625% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,018 | ||||||
City of San Buenaventura, Rev. Bonds (Community Memorial Health System), Series 2011, 7.50% 2041 | 12,750 | 15,475 | ||||||
Airport Commission, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco International Airport, Second Series Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2009-E, 5.25% 2032 | 3,500 | 4,016 | ||||||
Airport Commission, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco International Airport, | ||||||||
Second Series Rev. Ref. Bonds, AMT, 5.00% 2029 | 2,000 | 2,222 | ||||||
Airport Commission, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco International Airport, | ||||||||
Second Series Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2009-A, 4.90% 2029 | 3,000 | 3,432 | ||||||
City and County of San Francisco Redev. Fin. Auth., Tax Allocation Rev. Bonds (Mission Bay North Redev. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2009-C, 6.50% 2039 | 1,450 | 1,686 | ||||||
City and County of San Francisco Redev. Fin. Auth., Tax Allocation Rev. Bonds (Mission Bay North Redev. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2011-C, 6.75% 2041 | 900 | 1,053 | ||||||
City and County of San Francisco Redev. Fin. Auth., Tax Allocation Rev. Bonds (Mission Bay South Redev. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2009-D, 6.625% 2039 | 2,500 | 2,757 | ||||||
City and County of San Francisco Redev. Fin. Auth., Tax Allocation Rev. Bonds (Mission Bay South Redev. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2011-D, 7.00% 2041 | 2,000 | 2,286 | ||||||
City and County of San Francisco, Certs. of Part. (Multiple Capital Improvement Projects), Series 2009-A, 5.00% 2025 | 2,500 | 2,854 | ||||||
City of San Jose, Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-A-1, AMT, 5.75% 2034 | 6,925 | 7,974 | ||||||
City of San Jose, Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-A-1, AMT, 6.25% 2034 | 1,750 | 2,079 | ||||||
Redev. Agcy. of the City of San Jose, Housing Set-Aside Tax Allocation Bonds (Merged Area Redev. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2010-A-1, 5.00% 2022 | 1,600 | 1,647 | ||||||
Redev. Agcy. of the City of San Jose, Housing Set-Aside Tax Allocation Bonds (Merged Area Redev. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2010-A-1, 5.50% 2035 | 1,000 | 1,014 | ||||||
Redev. Agcy. of the City of San Jose, Tax Allocation Bonds (Merged Area Redev. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2003, FGIC-National insured, 4.90% 2033 | 2,000 | 1,971 | ||||||
Redev. Agcy. of the City of San Jose, Tax Allocation Ref. Bonds (Merged Area Redev. Project), | �� | |||||||
Series 2006-C, National insured, 3.75% 2028 | 4,450 | 3,914 | ||||||
San Mateo County Community College Dist. (County of San Mateo), Election of 2005 G.O. Bonds | ||||||||
(Capital Appreciation Bonds), Series 2006-B, National insured, 0% 2035 | 5,000 | 1,694 | ||||||
Community Redev. Agcy. of the City of Santa Ana, Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2011-A, 6.25% 2024 | 1,500 | 1,752 | ||||||
Community Redev. Agcy. of the City of Santa Ana, Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2011-A, 6.75% 2028 | 810 | 950 | ||||||
Redev. Agcy. of the City of Santa Clara, 2011 Tax Allocation Bonds (Bayshore North Project), 0% 2024 | 6,070 | 2,951 | ||||||
Redev. Agcy. of the City of Santa Clara, 2011 Tax Allocation Bonds (Bayshore North Project), 0% 2025 | 6,000 | 2,648 | ||||||
Santa Clara County, Mountain View Shoreline Regional Park Community, Rev. Bonds, Series 2011-A, 5.75% 2040 | 3,000 | 3,349 | ||||||
Community Facs. Dist. No. 99-1 (Talega), Santa Margarita Water Dist., Special Tax Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2011-A, 5.00% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,031 | ||||||
Community Facs. Dist. No. 99-1 (Talega), Santa Margarita Water Dist., Special Tax Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2011-A, 5.00% 2027 | 500 | 515 | ||||||
Community Facs. Dist. No. 99-1 (Talega), Santa Margarita Water Dist., Special Tax Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2011-B, 5.875% 2038 | 650 | 670 | ||||||
Redev. Agcy. of the City of Santa Monica, 2011 Tax Allocation Bonds (Earthquake Recovery Redev. Project), 5.00% 2042 | 1,125 | 1,246 | ||||||
Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe, Enterprise Rev. Bonds (Federally Tax Exempt), Series 2006, 4.875% 20161 | 4,295 | 4,492 | ||||||
Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe, Enterprise Rev. Bonds (Federally Tax Exempt), Series 2006, 5.00% 20201 | 6,700 | 6,864 | ||||||
Community Facs. Dist. No. 2 (Santaluz), Improvement Area No. 1, Special Tax Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-A, 5.10% 2030 | 465 | 499 | ||||||
Community Facs. Dist. No. 2002-1, Saugus Union School Dist., Special Tax Bonds, Series 2003, 6.00% 2033 | 1,000 | 1,011 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Certs. of Part. (Internext Group), 5.375% 2017 | 660 | 662 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Front Porch Communities and Services Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 5.125% 20371 | 3,000 | 3,086 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Childrens Hospital Los Angeles), Series 2007, 5.00% 2047 | 4,000 | 4,079 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Inland Regional Center Project), Series 2007, 5.25% 2027 | 3,000 | 3,094 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Inland Regional Center Project), Series 2007, 5.375% 2037 | 1,000 | 1,019 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Kaiser Permanente), Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2042 | 7,000 | 7,683 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (American Baptist Homes of the West), Series 2010, 6.00% 2029 | 2,000 | 2,204 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (American Baptist Homes of the West), Series 2010, 6.25% 2039 | 2,500 | 2,720 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Catholic Healthcare West), Series 2008-B, 5.50% 2030 | 985 | 1,095 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Catholic Healthcare West), Series 2008-D, 5.50% 2031 | 1,675 | 1,861 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Daughters of Charity Health System), Series 2005-H, 5.25% 2025 | 1,025 | 1,073 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Bonds (CHF-Irvine, LLC-UCI East Campus Apartments, Phase II), | ||||||||
Series 2008, 6.00% 2040 | 2,250 | 2,425 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(CHF-Irvine, LLC-UCI East Campus Apartments, Phase I), Series 2011, 5.125% 2031 | 2,000 | 2,138 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(CHF-Irvine, LLC-UCI East Campus Apartments, Phase I), Series 2011, 5.375% 2038 | 1,000 | 1,069 | ||||||
Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(CHF-Irvine, LLC-UCI East Campus Apartments, Phase II), Series 2006, 5.00% 2019 | 2,830 | 3,067 | ||||||
Stockton Public Fncg. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Redev. Projects), Series 2006-A, RADIAN insured, 5.00% 2020 | 2,640 | 2,323 | ||||||
City of Temecula, Public Fncg. Auth., Community Facs. Dist. No. 03-03 (Wolf Creek), Special Tax Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2003, 5.90% 2034 | 1,500 | 1,537 | ||||||
Thousand Oaks Community Facs. Dist., Ref. Bonds (Marketplace Mall), 5.00% 2022 | 1,035 | 1,040 | ||||||
Thousand Oaks Community Facs. Dist., Ref. Bonds (Marketplace Mall), 5.375% 2031 | 1,750 | 1,753 | ||||||
Tobacco Securitization Auth. of Southern California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-backed Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(San Diego County Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.), Series 2006-A, 5.125% 2046 | 13,935 | 10,995 | ||||||
Tuolumne Wind Project Auth., Rev. Bonds (Tuolumne Co. Project), Series 2009-A, 5.625% 2029 | 3,100 | 3,627 | ||||||
City of Turlock, Health Fac. Rev. Certs. of Part. (Emanuel Medical Center, Inc.), Series 2004-A, 5.375% 2034 | 2,500 | 2,530 | ||||||
Tustin Community Redev. Agcy., Tax Allocation Bonds (MCAS-Tustin Redev. Project Area), Series 2010, 5.00% 2024 | 1,165 | 1,260 | ||||||
Tustin Community Redev. Agcy., Tax Allocation Bonds (MCAS-Tustin Redev. Project Area), Series 2010, 5.00% 2028 | 700 | 751 | ||||||
Tustin Community Redev. Agcy., Tax Allocation Bonds (MCAS-Tustin Redev. Project Area), Series 2010, 5.00% 2035 | 1,000 | 1,042 | ||||||
Tustin Community Redev. Agcy., Tax Allocation Bonds (MCAS-Tustin Redev. Project Area), Series 2010, 5.00% 2040 | 450 | 466 | ||||||
Washington Township Health Care Dist., Rev. and Ref. Bonds, Series 2007-A, 5.00% 2037 | 70 | 73 | ||||||
366,403 | ||||||||
COLORADO — 4.69% | ||||||||
Baptist Road Rural Transportation Auth. (Town of Monument and Unincorporated El Paso County), | ||||||||
Sales and Use Tax Rev. Bonds, Series 2007, 4.80% 2017 | 1,115 | 1,035 | ||||||
Baptist Road Rural Transportation Auth. (Town of Monument and Unincorporated El Paso County), | ||||||||
Sales and Use Tax Rev. Bonds, Series 2007, 4.95% 2022 | 3,240 | 2,661 | ||||||
Baptist Road Rural Transportation Auth. (Town of Monument and Unincorporated El Paso County), | ||||||||
Sales and Use Tax Rev. Bonds, Series 2007, 5.00% 2026 | 1,980 | 1,509 | ||||||
Compark Business Campus Metropolitan Dist., Douglas County, G.O. Ref. and Improvement Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, RADIAN insured, 5.60% 2034 | 3,610 | 3,395 | ||||||
Cross Creek Metropolitan Dist. No. 2 (City of Aurora), Limited Tax G.O. Ref. Bonds, Series 2006, 3.50% 20372 | 2,000 | 1,550 | ||||||
City and County of Denver, Dept. of Aviation, Special Facs. Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds (United Air Lines Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, AMT, 5.25% 2032 | 18,000 | 17,965 | ||||||
City and County of Denver, Dept. of Aviation, Special Facs. Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds (United Air Lines Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, AMT, 5.75% 2032 | 2,905 | 2,969 | ||||||
Denver Health and Hospital Auth., Healthcare Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2007-B, 1.412% 20332 | 4,785 | 3,613 | ||||||
Educational and Cultural Facs. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Ref. Bonds (Campus Village Apartments Project), | ||||||||
Series 2008, 5.375% 2028 | 1,000 | 1,087 | ||||||
Educational and Cultural Facs. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Ref. Bonds (Campus Village Apartments Project), | ||||||||
Series 2008, 5.50% 2038 | 1,000 | 1,071 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Health Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society Project), | ||||||||
Series 2002, 5.90% 2027 (preref. 2012) | 1,830 | 1,847 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Health Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.25% 2024 | 3,880 | 4,123 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Health Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society Project), | ||||||||
Series 2012, 5.00% 2042 | �� | 10,845 | 11,524 | |||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc.), Series 2002-B, 6.125% 2033 | 1,000 | 1,025 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc.), Series 2005, 5.00% 2014 | 1,320 | 1,380 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc.), Series 2005, 5.00% 2015 | 1,150 | 1,218 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc.), Series 2005, 5.00% 2017 | 1,485 | 1,574 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc.), Series 2005, 5.00% 2018 | 2,095 | 2,207 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc.), Series 2005, 5.00% 2035 | 13,500 | 13,563 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Senior Residences Project), Series 2012, 7.00% 2042 | 2,500 | 2,668 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Senior Residences Project), Series 2012, 7.125% 2047 | 4,000 | 4,294 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Total Longterm Care National Obligated Group Project), Series 2011, 6.00% 2040 | 1,250 | 1,396 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Total Longterm Care National Obligated Group Project), Series 2010-A, 6.00% 2030 | 350 | 394 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Total Longterm Care National Obligated Group Project), Series 2010-A, 6.25% 2040 | 975 | 1,093 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Christian Living Communities Project), Series 2006-A, 5.75% 2037 | 1,000 | 1,025 | ||||||
City of Lakewood, Plaza Metropolitan Dist. No. 1, Public Improvement Fee/Tax Increment Supported Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2003, 8.00% 2025 | 7,500 | 7,786 | ||||||
Prairie Center Metropolitan Dist. No. 3 (City of Brighton, Adams County), | ||||||||
Limited Property Tax Supported Primary Improvements Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-A, 5.40% 2031 | 4,200 | 4,175 | ||||||
Public Auth. for Colorado Energy, Natural Gas Purchase Rev. Bonds, Series 2008, 6.25% 2028 | 2,000 | 2,407 | ||||||
Regional Transportation Dist., Tax-Exempt Private Activity Bonds (Denver Transit Partners Eagle P3 Project), | ||||||||
Series 2010, 6.00% 2034 | 1,700 | 1,958 | ||||||
Regional Transportation Dist., Tax-Exempt Private Activity Bonds (Denver Transit Partners Eagle P3 Project), | ||||||||
Series 2010, 6.00% 2041 | 14,800 | 16,870 | ||||||
Southlands Metropolitan Dist. No. 1 (City of Aurora), G.O. Ref. and Improvement Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2007, RADIAN insured, 5.25% 2034 | 430 | 415 | ||||||
Tallgrass Metropolitan Dist., Arapahoe County, G.O. (Limited Tax Convertible to Unlimited Tax) | ||||||||
Ref. and Improvement Bonds, Series 2007, 5.25% 2037 | 2,250 | 2,176 | ||||||
Tallyn’s Reach Metropolitan Dist. No. 3 (City of Aurora), Limited Tax G.O. Bonds (Convertible to Unlimited Tax), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.20% 2036 | 3,225 | 3,260 | ||||||
Traditions Metropolitan Dist. No. 2 (City of Aurora), G.O. (Limited Tax Convertible to Unlimited Tax) Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.75% 2036 | 1,190 | 1,145 | ||||||
Vista Ridge Metropolitan Dist. (Weld County), Limited Tax G.O. Improvement and Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, RADIAN insured, 5.00% 2036 | 1,980 | 1,721 | ||||||
Vista Ridge Metropolitan Dist. (Weld County), Limited Tax G.O. Ref. Bonds, Series 2006-B, 6.625% 2040 | 2,220 | 1,507 | ||||||
129,606 | ||||||||
CONNECTICUT — 1.12% | ||||||||
Dev. Auth., Pollution Control Rev. Ref. Bonds (Connecticut Light and Power Co. Project), | ||||||||
Series 1993-B, AMT, 5.95% 2028 | 1,500 | 1,512 | ||||||
Town of Hamden, Rev. Bonds (Whitney Center Project), Series 2009-A, 7.625% 2030 | 1,250 | 1,388 | ||||||
Town of Hamden, Rev. Bonds (Whitney Center Project), Series 2009-A, 7.75% 2043 | 4,500 | 4,960 | ||||||
Town of Hamden, Rev. Bonds (Whitney Center Project), Series 2009-B, 6.125% 2014 | 1,345 | 1,347 | ||||||
Mohegan Tribe of Indians, Gaming Auth. Priority Distribution Payment, Public Improvement Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2003, 5.125% 2023 | 3,350 | 3,301 | ||||||
Mohegan Tribe of Indians, Gaming Auth. Priority Distribution Payment, Public Improvement Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2003, 5.25% 2033 | 8,500 | 7,935 | ||||||
Mohegan Tribe of Indians, Gaming Auth. Priority Distribution Payment, Public Improvement Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2003, 5.50% 2013 | 380 | 381 | ||||||
Mohegan Tribe of Indians, Gaming Auth. Priority Distribution Payment, Public Improvement Rev. Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2001, 6.00% 2016 | 5,070 | 5,076 | ||||||
Mohegan Tribe of Indians, Gaming Auth. Priority Distribution Payment, Public Improvement Rev. Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2001, 6.25% 2021 | 3,000 | 3,003 | ||||||
Mohegan Tribe of Indians, Gaming Auth. Priority Distribution Payment, Public Improvement Rev. Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2001, 6.25% 2031 | 2,000 | 2,001 | ||||||
30,904 | ||||||||
DELAWARE — 0.03% | ||||||||
Housing Auth., Single-family Mortgage Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2009-A-1, 5.45% 2040 | 815 | 866 | ||||||
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA — 0.56% | ||||||||
Dist. of Columbia, Rev. Ref. Bonds (Catholic University of America Issue), Series 2007, National insured, 5.00% 2029 | 1,000 | 1,073 | ||||||
Dulles Toll Road, Rev. Bonds (Dulles Metrorail and Capital Improvement Projects), Convertible Capital Appreciation Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2010-B, 0%/6.50% 20443 | 5,000 | 4,257 | ||||||
Metropolitan Washington Airports Auth., Airport System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-A, AMT, 5.00% 2023 | 5,000 | 6,017 | ||||||
Metropolitan Washington Airports Auth., Airport System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-A, AMT, 5.00% 2029 | 2,500 | 2,891 | ||||||
Dist. of Columbia, Tax Increment Rev. Bonds (City Market at O Street Project), Series 2011, 5.125% 2041 | 1,175 | 1,268 | ||||||
15,506 | ||||||||
FLORIDA — 9.39% | ||||||||
Alachua County Health Facs. Auth., Health Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Shands HealthCare Project), | ||||||||
Series 2008-D-2, 6.75% 2030 | 900 | 1,053 | ||||||
Alachua County, Industrial Dev. Rev. Ref. Bonds (North Florida Retirement Village, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 5.75% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,005 | ||||||
Bartram Park Community Dev. Dist. (Jacksonville), Special Assessment Bonds, Series 2005, 4.875% 2015 | 700 | 713 | ||||||
Bartram Park Community Dev. Dist. (Jacksonville), Special Assessment Bonds, Series 2005, 5.30% 2035 | 1,715 | 1,693 | ||||||
Broward County, Airport System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-P-1, AMT, 5.00% 2023 | 4,000 | 4,583 | ||||||
Championsgate Community Dev. Dist., Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 1998-A, 6.25% 2020 | 2,475 | 2,414 | ||||||
Citizens Property Insurance Corp., High-Risk Account Secured Bonds, Series 2009-A-1, 6.00% 2017 | 7,000 | 8,255 | ||||||
Citizens Property Insurance Corp., Personal Lines Account/Commercial Lines Account Secured Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2012-A-1, 5.00% 2020 | 2,500 | 2,882 | ||||||
Citizens Property Insurance Corp., Personal Lines Account/Commercial Lines Account Secured Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2012-A-1, 5.00% 2021 | 8,500 | 9,824 | ||||||
Escambia County Health Facs. Auth., Health Care Facs. Rev. Bonds (Baptist Hospital, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2010-A, 5.75% 2029 | 5,250 | 5,855 | ||||||
Escambia County Housing Fin. Auth., Single-family Mortgage Rev. Bonds (Multi-County Program), | ||||||||
Series 2007-B, AMT, 4.70% 2039 | 1,885 | 1,914 | ||||||
Escambia County Housing Fin. Auth., Single-family Mortgage Rev. Ref. Bonds (Multi-County Program), | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, AMT, 4.80% 2038 | 3,855 | 3,953 | ||||||
Escambia County, Environmental Improvement Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2006-B, AMT, 5.00% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,003 | ||||||
Crossings at Fleming Island Community Dev. Dist. (Clay County), Special Assessment Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2000-C, 7.10% 2030 | 7,355 | 7,266 | ||||||
Gramercy Farms Community Dev. Dist. (St. Cloud), Special Assessment Bonds, Series 2007-B, 5.10% 20144 | 10,260 | — | ||||||
Gramercy Farms Community Dev. Dist. (St. Cloud), Special Assessment Ref. Bonds, Series 2011, 0% 2039 | 40,185 | 6,027 | ||||||
Greater Orlando Aviation Auth., Airport Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2009-C, 5.00% 2027 | 1,000 | 1,124 | ||||||
Greater Orlando Aviation Auth., Airport Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-A, AMT, 5.00% 2021 | 2,220 | 2,617 | ||||||
Greater Orlando Aviation Auth., Airport Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-A, AMT, 5.00% 2030 | 1,235 | 1,373 | ||||||
Greater Orlando Aviation Auth., Airport Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-A, AMT, 5.00% 2031 | 1,320 | 1,462 | ||||||
Harbor Bay Community Dev. Dist. (Hillsborough County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 2002, 6.75% 2034 | 3,995 | 3,802 | ||||||
Heritage Harbour Market Place Community Dev. Dist. (Manatee County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2005, 5.60% 2036 | 1,145 | 1,068 | ||||||
Higher Educational Facs. Fin. Auth., Educational Facs. Rev. and Ref. Bonds (Nova Southeastern University Project), | ||||||||
Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2032 | 1,000 | 1,077 | ||||||
Highlands County Health Facs. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Adventist Health System/Sunbelt Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2005-B, 5.00% 2018 (preref. 2015) | 250 | 287 | ||||||
Highlands County Health Facs. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Adventist Health System/Sunbelt Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2006-G, 5.125% 2018 (preref. 2016) | 100 | 119 | ||||||
Highlands County Health Facs. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Adventist Health System/Sunbelt Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2006-G, 5.125% 2023 (preref. 2016) | 70 | 83 | ||||||
Highlands County Health Facs. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Adventist Health System/Sunbelt Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2006-G, 5.125% 2023 | 930 | 1,022 | ||||||
Jacksonville Aviation Auth., Rev. Bonds, Series 2006, AMT, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2020 | 3,485 | 3,794 | ||||||
Jacksonville Aviation Auth., Rev. Bonds, Series 2006, AMT, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2022 | 1,940 | 2,083 | ||||||
Jacksonville Aviation Auth., Rev. Bonds, Series 2006, AMT, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2023 | 2,000 | 2,131 | ||||||
Jacksonville Econ. Dev. Commission, Health Care Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Proton Therapy Institute Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 6.25% 20271 | 4,565 | 5,060 | ||||||
Lake Ashton Community Dev. Dist. (City of Lake Wales, Polk County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2001-A, 7.40% 2032 | 650 | 641 | ||||||
Lake Ashton Community Dev. Dist. (City of Lake Wales, Polk County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2001-B, 6.40% 20114 | 110 | 82 | ||||||
Lake Ashton Community Dev. Dist. (City of Lake Wales, Polk County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2005-A, 5.60% 20374,5 | 875 | 580 | ||||||
Lake Ashton Community Dev. Dist. (City of Lake Wales, Polk County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2005-B, 4.875% 20104,5 | 2,585 | 1,713 | ||||||
Lake Ashton II Community Dev. Dist. (Polk County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 2005-A, 4.875% 20104,5 | 755 | 477 | ||||||
Lake Ashton II Community Dev. Dist. (Polk County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 2005-A, 5.375% 20364,5 | 2,190 | 1,685 | ||||||
Lake Ashton II Community Dev. Dist. (Polk County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-A, 5.30% 20384 | 1,970 | 674 | ||||||
Lake Ashton II Community Dev. Dist. (Polk County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-B, 5.00% 20114 | 7,420 | 2,536 | ||||||
Lakewood Ranch Stewardship Dist., Special Assessment Rev. Bonds (Country Club East Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.40% 2037 | 900 | 788 | ||||||
Lakewood Ranch Stewardship Dist., Special Assessment Rev. Bonds (Lake Club Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.50% 2036 | 2,995 | 2,391 | ||||||
Lakewood Ranch Stewardship Dist., Special Assessment Rev. Bonds (Lake Club Project), Series 2006-B, 6.77% 2020 | 2,880 | 2,790 | ||||||
Lee County Industrial Dev. Auth., Healthcare Facs. Rev. Bonds (Cypress Cove at Healthpark Florida, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 1997-A, 6.25% 2017 | 2,115 | 1,977 | ||||||
Lee County Industrial Dev. Auth., Healthcare Facs. Rev. Bonds (Shell Point/Alliance Obligated Group, | ||||||||
Shell Point Village Project), Series 2006, 5.00% 2032 | 3,000 | 2,996 | ||||||
Lee County Industrial Dev. Auth., Healthcare Facs. Rev. Bonds (Shell Point/Alliance Obligated Group, | ||||||||
Shell Point Village Project), Series 2006, 5.125% 2036 | 2,250 | 2,250 | ||||||
Lee County Industrial Dev. Auth., Healthcare Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Shell Point/Alliance Obligated Group, | ||||||||
Shell Point Project), Series 2011-B, 6.50% 2031 | 2,600 | 2,895 | ||||||
Lee County Industrial Dev. Auth., Healthcare Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Shell Point/Alliance Obligated Group, | ||||||||
Shell Point Village/Alliance Community Project), Series 2007, 5.00% 2016 | 3,455 | 3,743 | ||||||
Lee County Industrial Dev. Auth., Healthcare Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Shell Point/Alliance Obligated Group, | ||||||||
Shell Point Village/Alliance Community Project), Series 2007, 5.00% 2022 | 3,000 | 3,111 | ||||||
Lee County Industrial Dev. Auth., Healthcare Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Shell Point/Alliance Obligated Group, | ||||||||
Shell Point Village/Alliance Community Project), Series 2007, 5.00% 2029 | 13,425 | 13,503 | ||||||
Lee County, Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-A, AMT, Assured Guaranty insured, 5.00% 2022 | 1,860 | 2,099 | ||||||
Lee County, Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-A, AMT, 5.375% 2032 | 9,935 | 10,959 | ||||||
Lee County, Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-A, AMT, Assured Guaranty Municipal insured, 5.00% 2028 | 1,000 | 1,100 | ||||||
Lee County, Solid Waste System Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-A, AMT, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2016 | 4,535 | 4,998 | ||||||
Magnolia Creek Community Dev. Dist. (City of Freeport), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 2007-B, 5.60% 20144 | 4,255 | 1,703 | ||||||
Dept. of Management Services, Certs. of Part., Series 2009-A, 5.00% 2023 | 3,090 | 3,551 | ||||||
Marion County Hospital Dist., Health System Rev. Ref. and Improvement Bonds (Munroe Regional Health System), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.00% 2022 | 2,110 | 2,288 | ||||||
Marshall Creek Community Dev. Dist. (St. Johns County), Special Assessment Bonds, Series 2000-A, 7.65% 2032 | 2,635 | 2,637 | ||||||
Marshall Creek Community Dev. Dist. (St. Johns County), Special Assessment Bonds, Series 2002, 6.625% 2032 | 4,340 | 4,006 | ||||||
Martin County Health Facs. Auth., Hospital Rev. Bonds (Martin Memorial Medical Center), Series 2012, 5.50% 2042 | 6,000 | 6,558 | ||||||
Meadow Pointe IV, Community Dev. Dist. (Pasco County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 2004-A, 6.00% 20364 | 1,035 | — | ||||||
Meadow Pointe IV, Community Dev. Dist. (Pasco County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2012-A-1, 0%/6.00% 20363 | 160 | 128 | ||||||
Meadow Pointe IV, Community Dev. Dist. (Pasco County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2012-A-2, 0%/6.25% 20383 | 305 | 235 | ||||||
Meadow Pointe IV, Community Dev. Dist. (Pasco County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2012-B, 0%/6.81% 20203 | 405 | 350 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (University of Miami Issue), | ||||||||
Series 2007-B, AMBAC insured, 5.25% 2024 | 1,000 | 1,226 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County Expressway Auth., Toll System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-A, 5.00% 2040 | 2,000 | 2,179 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County, Miami International Airport (Hub of the Americas), Aviation Rev. Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2003-E, AMT, National insured, 5.375% 2017 | 1,000 | 1,159 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County, Miami International Airport (Hub of the Americas), Aviation Rev. Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2005-B, AMT, XLCA insured, 5.00% 2018 | 2,000 | 2,154 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County, Miami International Airport (Hub of the Americas), Aviation Rev. Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2005-B, AMT, XLCA insured, 5.00% 2021 | 4,445 | 4,715 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County, Miami International Airport (Hub of the Americas), Aviation Rev. Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2009-A, 5.50% 2036 | 2,000 | 2,295 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County, Transit System Sales Surtax Rev. Bonds, Series 2012, 5.00% 2042 | 2,800 | 3,148 | ||||||
Municipal Power Agcy., All-Requirements Power Supply Project Rev. Bonds, Series 2009-A, 5.50% 2024 | 1,000 | 1,188 | ||||||
North Springs Improvement Dist. (Broward County), Special Assessment Bonds (Heron Bay Project), | ||||||||
Series 1997, 7.00% 2019 | 1,525 | 1,526 | ||||||
North Springs Improvement Dist. (Broward County), Special Assessment Bonds | ||||||||
(Parkland Golf and Country Club Assessment Area), Series 2005-A-1, 5.45% 2026 | 2,415 | 2,349 | ||||||
Orange County Health Facs. Auth., Health Care Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Mayflower Retirement Center, Inc. Project), 5.00% 2036 | 250 | 255 | ||||||
Orlando-Orange County Expressway Auth., Rev. Bonds, Series 2010-A, 5.00% 2040 | 2,000 | 2,236 | ||||||
Palm Beach County Health Facs. Auth., Retirement Communities Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(ACTS Retirement — Life Communities, Inc. Obligated Group), Series 2010, 5.50% 2033 | 1,500 | 1,638 | ||||||
Palm Beach County Health Facs. Auth., Retirement Communities Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(ACTS Retirement — Life Communities, Inc. Obligated Group), Series 2006-B, 5.00% 2020 | 3,085 | 3,311 | ||||||
Palm Coast Park Community Dev. Dist. (City of Palm Coast, Flagler County), Special Assessment Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.70% 2037 | 3,500 | 2,389 | ||||||
Parklands Lee Community Dev. Dist., Special Assessment Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-A, 5.80% 2035 | 485 | 490 | ||||||
Paseo Community Dev. Dist., Fort Myers, Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 2005-B, 4.875% 20104 | 920 | — | ||||||
Paseo Community Dev. Dist., Fort Myers, Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 2006, 5.00% 20114 | 1,385 | — | ||||||
Paseo Community Dev. Dist., Fort Myers, Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 2011-A-1, 5.40% 2036 | 405 | 420 | ||||||
Paseo Community Dev. Dist., Fort Myers, Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 2011-A-2, 0% 2036 | 5,590 | 1,622 | ||||||
Pine Air Lakes Community Dev. Dist. (Collier County), Special Assessment Rev. Bonds, Series 2002, 7.25% 2033 | 1,955 | 1,972 | ||||||
Ports Fncg. Commission, Rev. Ref. Bonds (State Transportation Trust Fund — Intermodal Program), | ||||||||
Series 2011-B, AMT, 5.375% 2029 | 1,000 | 1,157 | ||||||
Ports Fncg. Commission, Rev. Ref. Bonds (State Transportation Trust Fund), Series 2011-B, AMT, 5.125% 2027 | 2,000 | 2,305 | ||||||
City of St. Cloud, Stevens Plantation Community Dev. Dist., Special Assessment Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2003-B, 6.375% 2013 | 1,320 | 930 | ||||||
St. Johns County Industrial Dev. Auth., First Mortgage Rev. Bonds (Presbyterian Retirement Communities Project), | ||||||||
Series 2004-A, 5.625% 2034 | 2,500 | 2,593 | ||||||
St. Johns County Industrial Dev. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Presbyterian Retirement Communities Project), | ||||||||
Series 2010-A, 5.875% 2040 | 3,625 | 3,991 | ||||||
St. Johns County Industrial Dev. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Presbyterian Retirement Communities Project), | ||||||||
Series 2010-A, 6.00% 2045 | 1,600 | 1,784 | ||||||
St. Johns County Industrial Dev. Auth., Health Care Rev. Ref. Bonds (Vicar’s Landing Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.00% 2017 | 1,540 | 1,603 | ||||||
St. Johns County Industrial Dev. Auth., Health Care Rev. Ref. Bonds (Vicar’s Landing Project), Series 2007, 5.00% 2027 | 4,230 | 4,329 | ||||||
Seminole Tribe of Florida, Series A, 5.25% 20271 | 11,650 | 11,884 | ||||||
Seminole Tribe of Florida, Series A, 5.50% 20241 | 1,500 | 1,582 | ||||||
Seminole Tribe of Florida, Series A, 5.75% 20221 | 1,130 | 1,216 | ||||||
Stevens Plantation Improvement Project Dependent Special Dist., Rev. Bonds, Series 2003, 6.375% 2013 | 2,035 | 1,433 | ||||||
City of Tampa, Capital Improvement Hospital Rev. Bonds (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Project), | ||||||||
Series 1999-A, 5.75% 2029 | 1,000 | 1,001 | ||||||
Tolomato Community Dev. Dist. (St. Johns County), Special Assessment Bonds, Series 2006, 5.40% 2037 | 1,370 | 1,217 | ||||||
Town Center at Palm Coast Community Dev. Dist. (City of Palm Coast, Flagler County), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2005, 6.00% 2036 | 2,740 | 2,104 | ||||||
Tuscany Reserve Community Dev. Dist., Collier County, Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 2005-A, 5.55% 2036 | 5,520 | 3,853 | ||||||
Tuscany Reserve Community Dev. Dist., Collier County, Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 2005-B, 5.25% 2016 | 1,135 | 1,047 | ||||||
Urban Orlando Community Dev. Dist. (City of Orlando), Capital Improvement Rev. Bonds, Series 2004, 6.00% 2020 | 750 | 750 | ||||||
Waterset North Community Dev. Dist. (Hillsborough County), Special Assessment Rev. Bonds, Series 2007-A, 6.60% 2039 | 1,620 | 1,348 | ||||||
Waterset North Community Dev. Dist. (Hillsborough County), Special Assessment Rev. Bonds, Series 2007-B, 6.55% 2015 | 3,910 | 3,220 | ||||||
West Villages Improvement Dist. (North Port), Special Assessment Bonds (Unit of Dev. No. 2), Series 2005, 5.80% 2036 | 5,940 | 2,854 | ||||||
259,459 | ||||||||
GEORGIA — 3.42% | ||||||||
Atlanta Dev. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Bonds (ADA/CAU Partners, Inc. Project at Clark Atlanta University), | ||||||||
Series 2004-A, ACA insured, 6.25% 2024 | 2,240 | 1,613 | ||||||
City of Atlanta, Airport General Rev. Bonds, Series 2012-C, AMT, 5.00% 2037 | 1,000 | 1,094 | ||||||
City of Atlanta, Airport General Rev. Bonds, Series 2012-C, AMT, 5.00% 2042 | 2,000 | 2,189 | ||||||
City of Atlanta, Airport General Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-B, AMT, 5.00% 2027 | 2,000 | 2,230 | ||||||
City of Atlanta, Tax Allocation Bonds (Beltline Project), Series 2008-B, 7.375% 2031 | 5,000 | 5,718 | ||||||
City of Atlanta, Water and Wastewater Rev. Bonds, Series 2001-A, National insured, 5.50% 2027 | 3,500 | 4,344 | ||||||
Dev. Auth. of Burke County, Pollution Control Rev. Bonds (Oglethorpe Power Corp. Vogtle Project), | ||||||||
Series 2008-E, 7.00% 2023 | 2,000 | 2,403 | ||||||
Dev. Auth. of Burke County, Pollution Control Rev. Ref. Bonds (Oglethorpe Power Corp. Vogtle Project), | ||||||||
Series 2008-C, 5.70% 2043 | 3,000 | 3,272 | ||||||
Clayton County, Tax Allocation Bonds (Ellenwood Project), Series 2008, 7.50% 2033 | 3,200 | 3,323 | ||||||
Dev. Auth. of Clayton County, Special Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Delta Air Lines, Inc. Project), Series 2009-A, 8.75% 2029 | 5,000 | 6,162 | ||||||
Dev. Auth. of Clayton County, Special Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Delta Air Lines, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2009-B, AMT, 9.00% 2035 | 6,000 | 6,608 | ||||||
DeKalb County Hospital Auth., Rev. Ref. Anticipation Certificates (DeKalb Medical Center, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2010, 6.00% 2030 | 5,250 | 5,928 | ||||||
DeKalb County Hospital Auth., Rev. Ref. Anticipation Certificates (DeKalb Medical Center, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2010, 6.125% 2040 | 2,750 | 3,096 | ||||||
Joint Dev. Auth. of DeKalb County, Newton County and Gwinnett County, Rev. Bonds (GGC Foundation, LLC Project), | ||||||||
Series 2009, 6.00% 2029 | 1,850 | 2,165 | ||||||
Joint Dev. Auth. of DeKalb County, Newton County and Gwinnett County, Rev. Bonds (GGC Foundation, LLC Project), | ||||||||
Series 2009, 6.125% 2040 | 5,000 | 5,822 | ||||||
Dev. Auth. of Fulton County, Rev. Bonds (TUFF CAUB LLC Project), Series 2007-A, 5.25% 2028 | 4,250 | 3,876 | ||||||
Gainesville and Hall County Dev. Auth., Retirement Community Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(ACTS Retirement — Life Communities, Inc. Obligated Group), Series 2009-A-2, 6.375% 2029 | 710 | 815 | ||||||
Gainesville and Hall County Dev. Auth., Retirement Community Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(ACTS Retirement — Life Communities, Inc. Obligated Group), Series 2009-A-2, 6.625% 2039 | 1,350 | 1,539 | ||||||
Gainesville Redev. Auth., Educational Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Riverside Military Academy Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.00% 2018 | 1,500 | 1,502 | ||||||
Gainesville Redev. Auth., Educational Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Riverside Military Academy Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.125% 2027 | 2,000 | 1,906 | ||||||
Gainesville Redev. Auth., Educational Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Riverside Military Academy Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.125% 2037 | 2,500 | 2,218 | ||||||
Hospital Auth. of Hall County and City of Gainesville, Rev. Anticipation Certificates | ||||||||
(Northeast Georgia Health System, Inc. Project), Series 2010-A, 5.00% 2030 | 2,000 | 2,177 | ||||||
Higher Education Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (USG Real Estate Foundation I, LLC Project), Series 2008, 6.00% 2034 | 6,500 | 7,391 | ||||||
Higher Education Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (USG Real Estate Foundation II, LLC Project), Series 2009-A, 5.50% 2039 | 3,500 | 3,918 | ||||||
Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev. Bonds, Series 2007-A, 5.50% 2023 | 2,000 | 2,203 | ||||||
Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev. Bonds, Series 2007-A, 5.50% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,111 | ||||||
Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev. Bonds, Series 2007-A, 5.50% 2028 | 1,395 | 1,541 | ||||||
Medical Center Hospital Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Spring Harbor at Green Island Project), Series 2007, 5.25% 2027 | 2,750 | 2,783 | ||||||
Medical Center Hospital Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Spring Harbor at Green Island Project), Series 2007, 5.25% 2037 | 1,375 | 1,359 | ||||||
Dev. Auth. of the City of Milledgeville and Baldwin County, Student Housing Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Georgia College & State University Foundation Property V, LLC Project), Series 2007, AMBAC insured, 0.959% 20332 | 3,000 | 2,043 | ||||||
Dev. Auth. of Richmond County, Environmental Improvement Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2002-A, AMT, 6.00% 2025 | 2,000 | 2,027 | ||||||
94,376 | ||||||||
GUAM — 0.20% | ||||||||
Education Fncg. Foundation, Certs. of Part. (Public School Facs. Project), Series 2006-A, 5.00% 2023 | 1,000 | 1,012 | ||||||
Government of Guam, Business Privilege Tax Bonds, Series 2011-A, 5.00% 2031 | 500 | 563 | ||||||
Government of Guam, Business Privilege Tax Bonds, Series 2012-B-1, 5.00% 2032 | 2,000 | 2,236 | ||||||
Government of Guam, Hotel Occupancy Tax Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-A, 6.125% 2031 | 1,000 | 1,159 | ||||||
Power Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-A, 5.50% 2030 | 625 | 662 | ||||||
5,632 | ||||||||
HAWAII — 0.23% | ||||||||
Dept. of Budget and Fin., Special Purpose Senior Living Rev. Bonds (15 Craigside Project), Series A, 8.75% 2029 | 1,000 | 1,217 | ||||||
Dept. of Budget and Fin., Special Purpose Senior Living Rev. Bonds (15 Craigside Project), Series A, 9.00% 2044 | 3,250 | 3,953 | ||||||
Pacific Health Obligated Group, Special Purpose Rev. Bonds (Dept. of Budget and Fin.), Series 2010-B, 5.75% 2040 | 1,000 | 1,117 | ||||||
6,287 | ||||||||
IDAHO — 0.19% | ||||||||
Housing and Fin. Assn., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 1999-B-2, AMT, 5.00% 2013 | 25 | 25 | ||||||
Housing and Fin. Assn., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2001-E, Class III, AMT, 5.40% 2021 | 80 | 80 | ||||||
Housing and Fin. Assn., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2002-E, Class III, AMT, 5.30% 2022 | 345 | 354 | ||||||
Housing and Fin. Assn., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2003-B, Class III, AMT, 5.10% 2023 | 440 | 443 | ||||||
Housing and Fin. Assn., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2003-C, Class III, AMT, 4.50% 2023 | 395 | 399 | ||||||
Housing and Fin. Assn., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2003-E, Class III, AMT, 5.15% 2023 | 685 | 696 | ||||||
Housing and Fin. Assn., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2004-A, Class III, AMT, 4.75% 2024 | 560 | 570 | ||||||
Housing and Fin. Assn., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2005-C, Class III, AMT, 4.80% 2026 | 585 | 600 | ||||||
Housing and Fin. Assn., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2007-C, Class III, AMT, 4.75% 2028 | 1,295 | 1,333 | ||||||
Housing and Fin. Assn., Single-family Mortgage Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 1999-D-3, AMT, 5.15% 2013 | 25 | 25 | ||||||
Housing and Fin. Assn., Single-family Mortgage Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 1999-G, AMT, 5.75% 2014 | 25 | 25 | ||||||
Housing and Fin. Assn., Single-family Mortgage Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2001-B, Class III, AMT, 5.75% 2020 | 415 | 422 | ||||||
Housing and Fin. Assn., Single-family Mortgage Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2002-C, Class III, AMT, 5.50% 2021 | 405 | 410 | ||||||
5,382 | ||||||||
ILLINOIS — 7.22% | ||||||||
Village of Bolingbrook, Will and DuPage Counties, Special Service Area No. 2005-1, Special Tax Bonds (Forest City Project), | ||||||||
Series 2005, 5.90% 2027 | 6,000 | 5,510 | ||||||
Build Bonds (Sales Tax Rev. Bonds), Series 2009-B, 5.00% 2024 | 2,000 | 2,334 | ||||||
Build Bonds (Sales Tax Rev. Bonds), Series 2009-B, 5.25% 2034 | 2,500 | 2,844 | ||||||
Village of Cary, McHenry County, Special Service Area Number Two, Special Tax Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2006, RADIAN insured, 4.40% 2016 | 515 | 513 | ||||||
Chicago Transit Auth., Sales Tax Receipts Rev. Bonds, Series 2011, 5.25% 2040 | 2,000 | 2,286 | ||||||
City of Chicago, O’Hare International Airport, General Airport Rev. Bonds, Series 2011-A, 5.75% 2039 | 3,000 | 3,542 | ||||||
City of Chicago, O’Hare International Airport, Special Fac. Rev. Ref. Bonds (American Airlines, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.50% 20304 | 17,500 | 11,419 | ||||||
Chicago Housing Auth., Capital Program Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2006, Assured Guaranty Municipal insured, 5.00% 2023 | 5,000 | 5,637 | ||||||
County of Cook, G.O. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-A, 5.25% 2022 | 1,250 | 1,499 | ||||||
Regional Transportation Auth. of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will Counties, G.O. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2004-A, Assured Guaranty Municipal insured, 5.50% 2022 | 2,500 | 3,143 | ||||||
County of DuPage, Special Service Area Number 31, Special Tax Bonds (Monarch Landing Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.40% 2016 | 432 | 437 | ||||||
County of DuPage, Special Service Area Number 31, Special Tax Bonds (Monarch Landing Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.625% 2036 | 4,900 | 4,852 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Charter School Project and Rev. Ref. Bonds (Chicago Charter School Foundation Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 5.00% 2021 | 1,750 | 1,847 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Charter School Project and Rev. Ref. Bonds (Chicago Charter School Foundation Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 5.00% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,030 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Charter School Project and Rev. Ref. Bonds (Chicago Charter School Foundation Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 5.00% 2036 | 4,000 | 4,073 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Recovery Zone Fac. Rev. Bonds (Navistar International Corp. Project), Series 2010, 6.50% 2040 | 1,500 | 1,555 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Admiral at the Lake Project), Series 2010-D-3, 6.00% 2017 | 1,500 | 1,501 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare), Series 2008-A, 5.625% 2037 | 6,000 | 6,421 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare), Series 2002, 6.25% 2017 | 1,665 | 1,745 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Sedgebrook, Inc. Fac.), Series 2007-A, 6.00% 20424 | 1,457 | — | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Three Crowns Park Project), Series 2006-A, 5.875% 2038 | 2,000 | 2,054 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Clare at Water Tower), Series 2010-A-6, 6.00% 20284 | 1,575 | 351 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Clare at Water Tower), Series 2010-A-7, 6.125% 20414 | 3,325 | 742 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Clare at Water Tower), Series 2010-B, 0% 2050 | 2,100 | 397 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Franciscan Communities, Inc.), Series 2007-A, 5.50% 2027 | 8,550 | 8,679 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Franciscan Communities, Inc.), Series 2007-A, 5.50% 2037 | 5,775 | 5,784 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Franciscan Communities, Inc. — Marian Village Project), Series 2003-E-3, 6.375% 2037 | 955 | 955 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Lutheran Hillside Village), Series 2006, 5.00% 2017 | 1,020 | 1,089 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Lutheran Hillside Village), Series 2006, 5.125% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,021 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Northwestern Memorial Hospital), Series 2009-A, 6.00% 2039 | 6,000 | 7,066 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (OSF Healthcare System), Series 2007-A, 5.75% 2033 | 1,500 | 1,654 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (OSF Healthcare System), Series 2007-A, 5.75% 2037 | 1,000 | 1,095 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (OSF Healthcare System), Series 2010-A, 6.00% 2039 | 9,055 | 10,436 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Provena Health), Series 2009-A, 7.75% 2034 | 9,800 | 12,630 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Provena Health), Series 2010-A, 6.00% 2028 | 2,250 | 2,572 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Riverside Health System), Series 2006-C, 4.50% 2026 | 1,500 | 1,522 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Sherman Health Systems), Series 2007-A, 5.50% 2037 | 4,200 | 4,529 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (University of Chicago Medical Center), Series 2009-B, 5.00% 2025 | 3,000 | 3,420 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Bonds (CHF-Normal, L.L.C. — Illinois State University Project), | ||||||||
Series 2011, 7.00% 2043 | 6,765 | 7,856 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Ref. Bonds (CHF-DeKalb II, L.L.C. — Northern Illinois University Project), | ||||||||
Series 2011, 6.875% 2043 | 11,500 | 13,666 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Ref. Bonds, Educational Advancement Fund, Inc. (University Center), | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, 5.25% 2034 | 2,970 | 3,128 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Ref. Bonds, Educational Advancement Fund, Inc. (University Center), | ||||||||
Series 2006-B, 5.00% 2025 | 5,000 | 5,261 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Ref. Bonds, Educational Advancement Fund, Inc. (University Center), | ||||||||
Series 2006-B, 5.25% 2019 | 2,875 | 3,171 | ||||||
G.O. Bonds, Series of March 2012, 5.00% 2025 | 2,000 | 2,236 | ||||||
G.O. Bonds, Series of March 2012, 5.00% 2037 | 1,500 | 1,625 | ||||||
G.O. Ref. Bonds, Series of May 2012, 5.00% 2021 | 3,000 | 3,446 | ||||||
G.O. Ref. Bonds, Series of May 2012, 5.00% 2024 | 1,500 | 1,697 | ||||||
G.O. Ref. Bonds, Series of May 2012, 5.00% 2025 | 1,500 | 1,684 | ||||||
Village of Hampshire (Kane County), Special Service Area Number 13, Special Tax Bonds (Tuscany Woods Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.75% 20374 | 4,966 | 2,556 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Riverside Health System), Series 2002, 5.75% 2022 (preref. 2012) | 1,000 | 1,016 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Centegra Health System), Series 1998, 5.25% 2014 | 1,500 | 1,504 | ||||||
Health Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Centegra Health System), Series 1998, 5.25% 2018 | 500 | 501 | ||||||
Housing Dev. Auth., Housing Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series G, 4.20% 2015 | 845 | 881 | ||||||
Housing Dev. Auth., Housing Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series G, 4.80% 2032 | 1,000 | 1,036 | ||||||
Village of Lakemoor, McHenry and Lake Counties, Special Service Area Number 97-1, Special Tax Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2006, RADIAN insured, 4.55% 2016 | 664 | 657 | ||||||
Village of Lincolnshire, Special Service Area No. 1, Special Tax Bonds (Sedgebrook Project), Series 2004, 6.25% 2034 | 1,804 | 1,828 | ||||||
Village of Manhattan (Will County), Special Service Area Number 2007-6, Special Tax Bonds | ||||||||
(Groebe Farm-Stonegate Project), Series 2007, 5.75% 20224 | 1,900 | 323 | ||||||
Village of Manhattan (Will County), Special Service Area Number 2007-6, Special Tax Bonds | ||||||||
(Groebe Farm-Stonegate Project), Series 2007, 6.125% 20404 | 5,000 | 850 | ||||||
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Auth., McCormick Place Expansion Project Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-B-1, | ||||||||
Assured Guaranty Municipal insured, 0% 2043 | 15,000 | 3,193 | ||||||
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Auth., McCormick Place Expansion Project Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-B-1, | ||||||||
Assured Guaranty Municipal insured, 0% 2044 | 7,000 | 1,408 | ||||||
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Auth., McCormick Place Expansion Project Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-B-1, | ||||||||
Assured Guaranty Municipal insured, 0% 2046 | 10,000 | 1,795 | ||||||
Village of Montgomery, Kane and Kendall Counties, Special Assessment Improvement Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Lakewood Creek Project), Series 2006, RADIAN insured, 4.70% 2030 | 879 | 846 | ||||||
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Auth., Tobacco Settlement Rev. Bonds, Series 2010, 5.50% 2023 | 5,000 | 5,845 | ||||||
State Toll Highway Auth., Toll Highway Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-A-1, 5.00% 2028 | 3,000 | 3,383 | ||||||
199,576 | ||||||||
INDIANA — 2.39% | ||||||||
City of Anderson, Econ. Dev. Rev. Ref. and Improvement Bonds (Anderson University Project), Series 2007, 5.00% 2028 | 2,055 | 1,655 | ||||||
City of Anderson, Econ. Dev. Rev. Ref. and Improvement Bonds (Anderson University Project), Series 2007, 5.00% 2032 | 1,000 | 773 | ||||||
Hospital Auth. of Delaware County, Hospital Rev. Bonds (Cardinal Health System Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.00% 2024 | 440 | 473 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Environmental Rev. Ref. Bonds (Duke Energy Indiana, Inc. Project), Series 2009-B, 6.00% 2039 | 7,000 | 8,185 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Indiana University Health Obligated Group), Series 2011-N, 5.00% 2031 | 4,000 | 4,347 | ||||||
Health and Educational Fac. Fncg. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Clarian Health Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2006-B, 5.00% 2023 | 1,000 | 1,097 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Midwestern Disaster Relief Rev. Bonds (Ohio Valley Electric Corp. Project), Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2032 | 3,800 | 4,056 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Midwestern Disaster Relief Rev. Bonds (Ohio Valley Electric Corp. Project), Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2039 | 8,175 | 8,516 | ||||||
Health and Educational Fac. Fncg. Auth., Hospital Rev. Bonds (Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana | ||||||||
Obligated Group), Series 2007, 5.50% 2027 | 4,000 | 4,246 | ||||||
Health and Educational Fac. Fncg. Auth., Hospital Rev. Bonds (Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana | ||||||||
Obligated Group), Series 2007, 5.50% 2037 | 7,750 | 8,118 | ||||||
Health Fac. Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Ascension Health Credit Group), Series 2002-F, 5.50% 2015 (preref. 2012) | 140 | 143 | ||||||
Indianapolis Airport Auth., Special Fac. Rev. Bonds (United Air Lines, Inc., Indianapolis Maintenance Center Project), | ||||||||
Series 1995-A, AMT, 6.50% 20314 | 3,500 | 44 | ||||||
Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank Bonds (Indianapolis Airport Auth. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006-F, AMT, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2019 | 2,250 | 2,498 | ||||||
Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank Bonds (Indianapolis Airport Auth. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006-F, AMT, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2022 | 2,500 | 2,714 | ||||||
Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank Bonds (Indianapolis Airport Auth. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006-F, AMT, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2023 | 7,500 | 8,101 | ||||||
Jasper County, Demand Pollution Control Rev. Ref. Bonds (Northern Indiana Public Service Co. Project), | ||||||||
Series 1988-C, National insured, 5.60% 2016 | 1,000 | 1,140 | ||||||
Jasper County, Demand Pollution Control Rev. Ref. Bonds (Northern Indiana Public Service Co. Project), | ||||||||
Series 1988-C, National insured, 5.85% 2019 | 1,000 | 1,183 | ||||||
Vanderburgh County Redev. Dist., Tax Increment Rev. Bonds of 2006, 5.00% 2021 | 1,375 | 1,457 | ||||||
Hospital Auth. of Vigo County, Hospital Rev. Bonds (Union Hospital, Inc.), Series 2007, 5.70% 2037 | 6,000 | 6,191 | ||||||
Hospital Auth. of Vigo County, Hospital Rev. Bonds (Union Hospital, Inc.), Series 2007, 5.75% 2042 | 1,000 | 1,030 | ||||||
65,967 | ||||||||
IOWA — 0.28% | ||||||||
Fin. Auth., Retirement Community Rev. Bonds (Edgewater, A Wesley Active Life Community, LLC Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 6.75% 2037 | 2,500 | 2,513 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Retirement Community Rev. Bonds (Edgewater, A Wesley Active Life Community, LLC Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 6.75% 2042 | 5,000 | 5,021 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2006-E, AMT, 5.50% 2036 | 180 | 187 | ||||||
7,721 | ||||||||
KANSAS — 0.52% | ||||||||
Dev. Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Lifespace Communities, Inc.), Series 2010-S, 5.00% 2030 | 1,920 | 2,043 | ||||||
City of Lenexa, Health Care Fac. Rev. Bonds (Lakeview Village, Inc. Project), Series 2009, 7.125% 2029 | 250 | 283 | ||||||
City of Lenexa, Health Care Fac. Rev. Bonds (Lakeview Village, Inc. Project), Series 2009, 7.25% 2039 | 750 | 841 | ||||||
City of Lenexa, Health Care Fac. Rev. Ref. and Improvement Bonds (Lakeview Village, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.125% 2017 | 1,200 | 1,282 | ||||||
City of Lenexa, Health Care Fac. Rev. Ref. and Improvement Bonds (Lakeview Village, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.50% 2039 | 6,250 | 6,352 | ||||||
City of Overland Park, Transportation Dev. Dist. Special Assessment Bonds (Tallgrass Creek Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.125% 2028 | 2,562 | 2,326 | ||||||
Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Transportation Dev. Dist. Sales Tax Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Legends at Village West Project), Series 2006, 4.60% 2016 | 1,130 | 1,155 | ||||||
14,282 | ||||||||
KENTUCKY — 0.87% | ||||||||
Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Baptist Healthcare System Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2009-A, 5.375% 2024 | 2,000 | 2,279 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Baptist Healthcare System Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2009-A, 5.625% 2027 | 2,000 | 2,273 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth., Hospital System Rev. Ref. and Improvement Bonds (Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 1997, 5.80% 2012 | 1,000 | 1,002 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth., Hospital System Rev. Ref. and Improvement Bonds (Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 1997, 5.85% 2017 | 7,000 | 7,008 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth., Hospital System Rev. Ref. and Improvement Bonds (Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 1997, 5.875% 2022 | 2,375 | 2,377 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth., Louisville Arena Project Rev. Bonds (Louisville Arena Auth., Inc.), | ||||||||
Series 2008-A-1, Assured Guaranty insured, 5.75% 2028 | 2,500 | 2,799 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth., Louisville Arena Project Rev. Bonds (Louisville Arena Auth., Inc.), | ||||||||
Series 2008-A-1, Assured Guaranty insured, 6.00% 2033 | 1,000 | 1,115 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth., Louisville Arena Project Rev. Bonds (Louisville Arena Auth., Inc.), | ||||||||
Series 2008-A-1, Assured Guaranty insured, 6.00% 2042 | 2,000 | 2,199 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Masonic Home Independent Living), 5.25% 2017 | 500 | 504 | ||||||
Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Health Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Jewish Hospital & St. Mary’s HealthCare, Inc. Project), Series 2008, 6.125% 2037 (preref. 2018) | 2,005 | 2,561 | ||||||
24,117 | ||||||||
LOUISIANA — 2.19% | ||||||||
Citizens Property Insurance Corp., Assessment Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-B, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2020 | 3,000 | 3,339 | ||||||
Jefferson Parish Hospital Dist. No. 1, Parish of Jefferson, Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (West Jefferson Medical Center), | ||||||||
Series 2011-A, 6.00% 2039 | 2,000 | 2,246 | ||||||
Local Government Environmental Facs. and Community Dev. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Westlake Chemical Corp. Projects), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 6.75% 2032 | 9,500 | 10,697 | ||||||
Local Government Environmental Facs. and Community Dev. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Westlake Chemical Corp. Projects), | ||||||||
Series 2009-A, 6.50% 2029 | 4,400 | 5,176 | ||||||
Local Government Environmental Facs. and Community Dev. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Westlake Chemical Corp. Projects), | ||||||||
Series 2010-A-1, 6.50% 2035 | 5,500 | 6,388 | ||||||
Local Government Environmental Facs. and Community Dev. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Westlake Chemical Corp. Projects), | ||||||||
Series 2010-A-2, 6.50% 2035 | 3,500 | 4,065 | ||||||
Public Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Ochsner Clinic Foundation Project), Series 2007-A, 5.25% 2038 | 3,000 | 3,106 | ||||||
Public Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Ochsner Clinic Foundation Project), Series 2007-A, 5.375% 2043 | 500 | 517 | ||||||
Public Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (CHRISTUS Health), Series 2009-A, 6.00% 2029 | 2,000 | 2,320 | ||||||
Parish of St. Charles, Gulf Opportunity Zone Rev. Bonds (Valero Project), Series 2010, 4.00% 2040 (put 2022) | 5,500 | 5,838 | ||||||
Parish of St. John the Baptist, Rev. Bonds (Marathon Oil Corp. Project), Series 2007-A, 5.125% 2037 | 6,375 | 6,782 | ||||||
Tobacco Settlement Auth., Asset-backed Bonds, Series 2001-B, 5.50% 2030 | 9,760 | 9,955 | ||||||
60,429 | ||||||||
MAINE — 0.46% | ||||||||
Health and Higher Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (MaineGeneral Medical Center Issue), 6.75% 2036 | 4,000 | 4,715 | ||||||
Health and Higher Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (MaineGeneral Medical Center Issue), 6.75% 2041 | 5,350 | 6,254 | ||||||
Health and Higher Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (MaineGeneral Medical Center Issue), 7.00% 2041 | 1,500 | 1,784 | ||||||
12,753 | ||||||||
MARYLAND — 1.35% | ||||||||
City of Annapolis, Special Obligation Bonds (Park Place Project), Series 2005-A, 5.35% 2034 | 2,616 | 2,638 | ||||||
City of Annapolis, Special Obligation Bonds (Park Place Project), Series 2005-B, 4.75% 2034 | 1,171 | 1,176 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Corp., Student Housing Rev. Bonds (Frostburg State University Project), Series 2002-A, 6.00% 2024 | 5,000 | 5,045 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Corp., Student Housing Rev. Bonds (Frostburg State University Project), Series 2002-A, 6.25% 2033 | 5,000 | 5,042 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Corp., Student Housing Rev. Bonds (Towson University Project), Series 2007-A, 5.25% 2037 | 500 | 520 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Corp., Student Housing Rev. Bonds (University of Maryland, College Park Projects), Series 2008, 5.80% 2038 | 1,000 | 1,080 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Corp., Student Housing Rev. Bonds (University of Maryland, College Park Projects), Series 2008, 5.875% 2043 | 1,000 | 1,081 | ||||||
Frederick County, Special Obligation Bonds (Urbana Community Dev. Auth.), Series 2010-A, 5.00% 2030 | 3,335 | 3,677 | ||||||
City of Gaithersburg, Econ. Dev. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Asbury Maryland Obligated Group), Series 2006-A, 5.125% 2036 | 7,000 | 7,050 | ||||||
Prince George’s County, Special Obligation Bonds (National Harbor Project), Series 2004, 4.70% 2015 | 1,450 | 1,510 | ||||||
Prince George’s County, Special Obligation Bonds (National Harbor Project), Series 2004, 5.20% 2034 | 7,250 | 7,424 | ||||||
Prince George’s County, Special Tax Dist. Bonds (Victoria Falls Project), Series 2005, 5.25% 2035 | 1,000 | 1,002 | ||||||
37,245 | ||||||||
MASSACHUSETTS — 1.26% | ||||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy, Rev. Ref. Bonds (Tufts Medical Center Issue), Series 2011-I, 6.75% 2036 | 3,190 | 3,763 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Tufts Medical Center Issue), Series 2011-I, 6.875% 2041 | 3,000 | 3,572 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Rev. Bonds (Berkshire Health Systems Issue), Series 2012-G, 5.00% 2029 | 1,000 | 1,115 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Rev. Bonds (Berkshire Health Systems Issue), Series 2012-G, 5.00% 2031 | 500 | 557 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Rev. Bonds (Curry College Issue), Series 2006-A, ACA insured, 5.25% 2026 | 1,400 | 1,456 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Rev. Bonds (Eastern Nazarene College Issue), Tax-Exempt Series 1999, 5.625% 2019 | 720 | 720 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Rev. Bonds (Eastern Nazarene College Issue), Tax-Exempt Series 1999, 5.625% 2029 | 4,150 | 4,151 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Rev. Bonds (Linden Ponds, Inc. Fac.), Series 2011-A-1, 6.25% 2021 | 712 | 625 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Rev. Bonds (Linden Ponds, Inc. Fac.), Series 2011-A-1, 6.25% 2031 | 1,760 | 1,383 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Rev. Bonds (Linden Ponds, Inc. Fac.), Series 2011-A-1, 6.25% 2039 | 2,115 | 1,581 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Rev. Bonds (Linden Ponds, Inc. Fac.), Series 2011-A-1, 6.25% 2046 | 1,418 | 1,036 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Rev. Bonds (Linden Ponds, Inc. Fac.), Series 2011-A-2, 5.50% 2046 | 320 | 200 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Rev. Bonds (Linden Ponds, Inc. Fac.), Series 2011-B, 0% 2056 | 1,591 | 8 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Rev. Bonds (Partners HealthCare System Issue), Series 2012-L, 5.00% 2041 | 1,000 | 1,121 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Emerson College Issue), Series 2010-A, 5.00% 2040 | 3,265 | 3,425 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Senior Living Fac. Rev. Bonds (Groves in Lincoln Issue), Series 2009-A, 7.75% 20395 | 2,000 | 1,047 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Senior Living Fac. Rev. Bonds (Groves in Lincoln Issue), Series 2009-A, 7.875% 20445 | 1,000 | 523 | ||||||
Dev. Fin. Agcy., Senior Living Fac. Rev. Bonds (Groves in Lincoln Issue), Series 2009-B-2, 6.25% 20145 | 290 | 191 | ||||||
Educational Fncg. Auth., Education Loan Rev. Bonds, Issue E, Series 2007, AMT, AMBAC insured, 4.70% 2027 | 1,250 | 1,285 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Northeastern University Issue), Series 2010-A, 5.00% 2035 | 1,800 | 2,017 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Suffolk University Issue), Series 2009-A, 5.75% 2039 | 1,000 | 1,115 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Suffolk University Issue), Series 2009-A, 6.00% 2024 | 1,500 | 1,778 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Suffolk University Issue), Series 2009-A, 6.25% 2030 | 1,000 | 1,165 | ||||||
Port Auth., Rev. Bonds, Series 2012-A, AMT, 5.00% 2037 | 1,000 | 1,109 | ||||||
34,943 | ||||||||
MICHIGAN — 4.85% | ||||||||
Econ. Dev. Corp. of the City of Dearborn, Limited Obligation Rev. Ref. Bonds (Henry Ford Village, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2008, 7.00% 2038 | 2,500 | 2,608 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Corp. of the City of Dearborn, Limited Obligation Rev. Ref. Bonds (Henry Ford Village, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2008, 7.125% 2043 | 5,000 | 5,233 | ||||||
City of Detroit, Water and Sewerage Dept. Sewage Disposal System Rev. and Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-A, 5.25% 2039 | 4,100 | 4,332 | ||||||
City of Detroit, Water Supply System Rev. Bonds, Series 2011-A, 5.25% 2041 | 12,650 | 13,297 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (School Dist. of the City of Detroit), Series 2011, 5.50% 2021 | 1,000 | 1,163 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (School Dist. of the City of Detroit), Series 2012, 5.00% 2019 | 900 | 1,027 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (School Dist. of the City of Detroit), Series 2012, 5.00% 2020 | 1,450 | 1,658 | ||||||
School Dist. of the City of Detroit (Wayne County), School Building and Site Improvement Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Unlimited Tax G.O.), Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2025 | 1,415 | 1,653 | ||||||
School Dist. of the City of Detroit (Wayne County), School Building and Site Improvement Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Unlimited Tax G.O.), Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,159 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Corp. of the City of Kentwood, Limited Obligation Rev. Ref. Bonds (Holland Home Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2012, 5.125% 2032 | 1,000 | 1,005 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Corp. of the City of Kentwood, Limited Obligation Rev. Ref. Bonds (Holland Home Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2012, 5.375% 2041 | 1,250 | 1,256 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Corp. of the City of Kentwood, Limited Obligation Rev. Ref. Bonds (Holland Home Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2012, 5.625% 2041 | 4,000 | 4,121 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Trinity Health Credit Group), Series 2011, 5.00% 2039 | 1,250 | 1,387 | ||||||
Fin. Auth., Hospital Rev. and Ref. Bonds (Oakwood Obligated Group), Series 2012, 5.00% 2027 | 1,090 | 1,233 | ||||||
City of Flint, Hospital Building Auth., Rev. Ref. Rental Bonds (Hurley Medical Center), Series 2010, 6.00% 2020 | 3,935 | 4,016 | ||||||
City of Flint, Hospital Building Auth., Rev. Rental Bonds (Hurley Medical Center), Series 1998-B, 5.375% 2018 | 985 | 987 | ||||||
City of Flint, Hospital Building Auth., Rev. Rental Bonds (Hurley Medical Center), Series 1998-B, 5.375% 2028 | 2,750 | 2,752 | ||||||
City of Flint, Hospital Building Auth., Rev. Rental Bonds (Hurley Medical Center), Series 2010, 7.375% 2035 | 1,500 | 1,754 | ||||||
City of Flint, Hospital Building Auth., Rev. Rental Bonds (Hurley Medical Center), Series 2010, 7.50% 2039 | 1,750 | 2,053 | ||||||
Higher Education Student Loan Auth., Student Loan Rev. Bonds, Series XVII-P, AMT, AMBAC insured, 4.50% 2017 | 5,000 | 5,285 | ||||||
Higher Education Student Loan Auth., Student Loan Rev. Bonds, Series XVII-Q, AMT, AMBAC insured, 4.75% 2017 | 2,000 | 2,168 | ||||||
Higher Education Student Loan Auth., Student Loan Rev. Bonds, Series XVII-Q, AMT, AMBAC insured, 4.95% 2026 | 2,500 | 2,581 | ||||||
Hospital Fin. Auth., Hospital Rev. Bonds (MidMichigan Obligated Group), Series 2006-A, 5.00% 2036 | 3,000 | 3,105 | ||||||
Hospital Fin. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Henry Ford Health System), Series 2006-A, 5.25% 2046 | 500 | 528 | ||||||
Hospital Fin. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Henry Ford Health System), Series 2009, 5.75% 2039 | 5,500 | 6,190 | ||||||
Hospital Fin. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Trinity Health Credit Group), Series 2002-C, 5.375% 2023 (preref. 2012) | 1,500 | 1,526 | ||||||
Kent Hospital Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Spectrum Health System), Series 2011-A, 5.00% 2029 | 1,000 | 1,135 | ||||||
County of Monroe Hospital Fin. Auth., Hospital Rev. and Ref. Bonds (Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp. Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.375% 2026 | 1,250 | 1,323 | ||||||
County of Monroe Hospital Fin. Auth., Hospital Rev. and Ref. Bonds (Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp. Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.50% 2035 | 995 | 1,035 | ||||||
City of Royal Oak Hospital Fin. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (William Beaumont Hospital Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2009-V, 8.25% 2039 | 4,000 | 5,169 | ||||||
City of Saginaw Hospital Fin. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Covenant Medical Center, Inc.), | ||||||||
Series 2010-H, 5.00% 2030 | 2,700 | 2,864 | ||||||
State Building Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Facs. Program), Series 2008-I, 6.00% 2038 | 1,000 | 1,158 | ||||||
Strategic Fund, Limited Obligation Rev. Ref. Bonds (Detroit Edison Co. Exempt Facs. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2008-KT, 5.625% 2020 | 1,800 | 2,172 | ||||||
Tobacco Settlement Fin. Auth., Tobacco Settlement Asset-backed Bonds, Current Interest Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 6.00% 2048 | 23,355 | 19,211 | ||||||
Tobacco Settlement Fin. Auth., Tobacco Settlement Asset-backed Rev. Ref. Bonds, Current Interest Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2008-A, 6.875% 2042 | 5,440 | 5,451 | ||||||
Wayne County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Bonds (Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport), | ||||||||
Series 2005, AMT, National insured, 5.00% 2034 | 9,000 | 9,150 | ||||||
Wayne County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Bonds (Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport), | ||||||||
Series 2007, AMT, FGIC-National insured, 5.00% 2018 | 1,000 | 1,109 | ||||||
Wayne County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds (Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport), | ||||||||
Series 2010-A, AMT, 5.00% 2018 | 2,000 | 2,269 | ||||||
Wayne County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds (Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport), | ||||||||
Series 2011-A, AMT, 5.00% 2020 | 5,000 | 5,714 | ||||||
Wayne County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds (Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport), | ||||||||
Series 2011-A, AMT, 5.00% 2022 | 2,000 | 2,246 | ||||||
134,083 | ||||||||
MINNESOTA — 0.49% | ||||||||
Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission, Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2009-B, AMT, 5.00% 2022 | 2,000 | 2,271 | ||||||
Tobacco Securitization Auth., Tobacco Settlement Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-B, 5.25% 2031 | 8,500 | 9,580 | ||||||
City of Wayzata, Senior Housing Entrance Deposit Rev. Bonds (Folkestone Senior Living Community), | ||||||||
Series 2012-B, 4.875% 2019 | 1,800 | 1,821 | ||||||
13,672 | ||||||||
MISSISSIPPI — 0.53% | ||||||||
Hospital Equipment and Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Baptist Memorial Health Care), Series 2004-B-1, 5.00% 2024 | 1,500 | 1,569 | ||||||
Hospital Equipment and Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Mississippi Baptist Health Systems, Inc.), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 5.00% 2026 | 4,500 | 4,761 | ||||||
Warren County, Gulf Opportunity Zone Bonds (International Paper Co. Project), Series 2011-A, 5.375% 2035 | 7,600 | 8,290 | ||||||
14,620 | ||||||||
MISSOURI — 2.04% | ||||||||
Industrial Dev. Auth. of the County of Cape Girardeau, Health Facs. Rev. Bonds (Southeast Missouri Hospital Assn.), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.00% 2019 | 1,885 | 2,020 | ||||||
City of Fenton, Tax Increment Rev. Ref. Bonds (Gravois Bluffs Redev. Project), Series 2006, 4.50% 2021 | 1,000 | 1,026 | ||||||
Hawk Ridge Transportation Dev. Dist. (Lake St. Louis), Transportation Sales Tax Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-A, 4.65% 2017 | 1,395 | 1,265 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Senior Living Facs. Rev. Bonds (Lutheran Senior Services Projects), | ||||||||
Series 2010, 5.50% 2042 | 2,000 | 2,128 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Senior Living Facs. Rev. Bonds (Lutheran Senior Services Projects), | ||||||||
Series 2011, 6.00% 2041 | 1,000 | 1,123 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Senior Living Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Lutheran Senior Services), | ||||||||
Series 2007-B, 4.875% 2038 | 3,000 | 3,024 | ||||||
Industrial Dev. Auth. of the City of Lee’s Summit, Senior Living Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(John Knox Village Obligated Group), Series 2007-A, 5.125% 2026 | 7,950 | 7,997 | ||||||
Industrial Dev. Auth. of the City of Lee’s Summit, Senior Living Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (John Knox Village Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 5.125% 2032 | 3,500 | 3,508 | ||||||
City of St. Louis, Airport Rev. Bonds (Lambert-St. Louis International Airport), Series 2009-A-1, 6.25% 2029 | 2,000 | 2,332 | ||||||
City of St. Louis, Airport Rev. Bonds (Lambert-St. Louis International Airport), Series 2009-A-1, 6.625% 2034 | 4,000 | 4,731 | ||||||
City of St. Louis, Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds (Lambert-St. Louis International Airport), | ||||||||
Series 2005, National insured, 5.50% 2027 | 3,275 | 3,894 | ||||||
City of St. Louis, Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds (Lambert-St. Louis International Airport), | ||||||||
Series 2005, National insured, 5.50% 2028 | 1,000 | 1,184 | ||||||
City of St. Louis, Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds (Lambert-St. Louis International Airport), | ||||||||
Series 2005, National insured, 5.50% 2029 | 1,000 | 1,182 | ||||||
City of St. Louis, Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds (Lambert-St. Louis International Airport), | ||||||||
Series 2007-B, AMT, Assured Guaranty Municipal insured, 5.00% 2027 | 5,490 | 5,858 | ||||||
City of St. Louis, Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds (Lambert-St. Louis International Airport), Series 2012, AMT, 5.00% 2032 | 1,685 | 1,793 | ||||||
State Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Auth., Water Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Missouri-American Water Co. Project), Series 2006, AMT, AMBAC insured, 4.60% 2036 | 10,000 | 9,947 | ||||||
Transportation Dev. Dist. (Hazelwood, St. Louis County), Transportation Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Missouri Bottom Road/Taussig Road), Series 2002, 7.20% 2033 | 3,300 | 3,326 | ||||||
56,338 | ||||||||
MONTANA — 0.27% | ||||||||
Fac. Fin. Auth., Senior Living Rev. Ref. Bonds (St. John’s Lutheran Ministries Project), Series 2006-A, 6.00% 2025 | 2,250 | 2,349 | ||||||
Fac. Fin. Auth., Senior Living Rev. Ref. Bonds (St. John’s Lutheran Ministries Project), Series 2006-A, 6.125% 2036 | 4,850 | 5,005 | ||||||
7,354 | ||||||||
NEBRASKA — 0.31% | ||||||||
Central Plains Energy Project, Gas Project Rev. Bonds (Project No. 3), Series 2012, 5.00% 2042 | 4,250 | 4,378 | ||||||
Hospital Auth. No. 3 of Douglas County, Health Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Methodist Health System), | ||||||||
Series 2008, 5.75% 2028 | 3,500 | 3,869 | ||||||
Investment Fin. Auth., Single-family Housing Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-C, AMT, 5.50% 2036 | 265 | 267 | ||||||
8,514 | ||||||||
NEVADA — 3.04% | ||||||||
Clark County, Airport System Rev. Bonds, Series 2007-A-1, AMT, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2027 | 4,000 | 4,222 | ||||||
Clark County, Airport System Rev. Bonds, Series 2011-A-1, AMT, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2026 | 2,000 | 2,121 | ||||||
Clark County, Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport, Passenger Fac. Charge Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2007-A-1, AMT, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2023 | 6,000 | 6,479 | ||||||
Clark County, Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport, Passenger Fac. Charge Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2007-A-1, AMT, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2024 | 1,000 | 1,070 | ||||||
Clark County, Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport, Passenger Fac. Charge Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2007-A-1, AMT, AMBAC insured, 5.00% 2025 | 2,000 | 2,128 | ||||||
Clark County, Highway Rev. (Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax) Improvement and Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-B, 5.00% 2028 | 6,300 | 7,147 | ||||||
Clark County, Highway Rev. (Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax) Ref. Bonds, Series 2011, 5.00% 2022 | 3,000 | 3,710 | ||||||
Clark County, Special Improvement Dist. No. 121 (Southern Highlands Area), Local Improvement Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2006-B, 5.30% 2029 | 1,000 | 892 | ||||||
Clark County, Special Improvement Dist. No. 132 (Summerlin South Area (Villages 15A and 18)), | ||||||||
Local Improvement Bonds, Series 2001, 6.40% 2014 | 1,090 | 1,101 | ||||||
Clark County, Special Improvement Dist. No. 132 (Summerlin South Area (Villages 15A and 18)), | ||||||||
Local Improvement Bonds, Series 2001, 6.50% 2015 | 850 | 859 | ||||||
Clark County, Special Improvement Dist. No. 132 (Summerlin South Area (Villages 15A and 18)), | ||||||||
Local Improvement Bonds, Series 2001, 6.875% 2021 | 2,210 | 2,232 | ||||||
Clark County, Special Improvement Dist. No. 142 (Mountain’s Edge), Local Improvement Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2003, 6.375% 2023 | 3,080 | 3,172 | ||||||
Clark County, Special Improvement Dist. No. 142 (Mountain’s Edge), Local Improvement Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2012, 5.00% 2020 | 1,560 | 1,694 | ||||||
Clark County, Special Improvement Dist. No. 142 (Mountain’s Edge), Local Improvement Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2012, 5.00% 2021 | 1,675 | 1,812 | ||||||
City of Henderson, Health Fac. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Catholic Healthcare West), Series 2007-B, 5.25% 2031 | 2,000 | 2,130 | ||||||
City of Henderson, Local Improvement Dist. No. T-16 (Falls at Lake Las Vegas), | ||||||||
Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds, 5.00% 2018 | 1,115 | 988 | ||||||
City of Henderson, Local Improvement Dist. No. T-16 (Falls at Lake Las Vegas), | ||||||||
Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds, 5.00% 2019 | 1,395 | 1,208 | ||||||
City of Henderson, Local Improvement Dist. No. T-16 (Falls at Lake Las Vegas), | ||||||||
Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds, 5.125% 2025 | 3,475 | 2,743 | ||||||
City of Henderson, Local Improvement Dist. No. T-17 (Madeira Canyon), | ||||||||
Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds, 5.00% 2014 | 695 | 717 | ||||||
City of Henderson, Local Improvement Dist. No. T-17 (Madeira Canyon), | ||||||||
Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds, 5.00% 2017 | 960 | 989 | ||||||
City of Henderson, Local Improvement Dist. No. T-18 (Inspirada), Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds, 5.00% 2015 | 2,285 | 1,860 | ||||||
City of Henderson, Local Improvement Dist. No. T-18 (Inspirada), Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds, 5.00% 2016 | 1,295 | 1,000 | ||||||
City of Henderson, Local Improvement Dist. No. T-18 (Inspirada), Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds, 5.25% 2026 | 2,490 | 1,394 | ||||||
City of Henderson, Local Improvement Dist. No. T-18 (Inspirada), Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds, 5.30% 2035 | 8,450 | 4,682 | ||||||
City of Henderson, Local Improvement Dist. No. T-4C (Green Valley Properties), Limited Obligation Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 1999-A, 5.75% 2013 | 875 | 881 | ||||||
City of Henderson, Local Improvement Dist. No. T-4C (Green Valley Properties), Limited Obligation Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 1999-A, 5.90% 2018 | 945 | 948 | ||||||
City of Las Vegas Redev. Agcy., Tax Increment Rev. Bonds, Series 2009-A, 8.00% 2030 | 6,000 | 6,692 | ||||||
City of Las Vegas, Special Improvement Dist. No. 607 (Providence), Local Improvement Bonds, Series 2004, 5.75% 2016 | 2,070 | 2,137 | ||||||
Las Vegas Valley Water Dist., G.O. (Limited Tax) Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-B, 5.00% 2042 | 1,000 | 1,134 | ||||||
Las Vegas Valley Water Dist., G.O. (Limited Tax) Water and Ref. Bonds, Series 2009-D, 5.00% 2027 | 3,395 | 3,862 | ||||||
City of Reno, Hospital Rev. Bonds (Renown Regional Medical Center Project), Series 2007-A, 5.25% 2037 | 5,000 | 5,253 | ||||||
Redev. Agcy. of the City of Reno, Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2007-B, 5.00% 2027 | 2,000 | 1,114 | ||||||
Redev. Agcy. of the City of Reno, Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2007-C, 5.40% 2027 | 2,375 | 950 | ||||||
Rural Housing Auth., Single-family Mortgage Rev. Bonds (Mortgage-backed Securities Program), | ||||||||
Series 2007-B, AMT, 5.70% 2041 | 1,790 | 1,865 | ||||||
City of Sparks, Local Improvement Dist. No. 3 (Legends at Sparks Marina), | ||||||||
Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds, 6.50% 2020 | 1,735 | 1,843 | ||||||
City of Sparks, Local Improvement Dist. No. 3 (Legends at Sparks Marina), | ||||||||
Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds, 6.75% 2027 | 1,000 | 1,037 | ||||||
84,066 | ||||||||
NEW HAMPSHIRE — 0.43% | ||||||||
Business Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Elliot Hospital Obligated Group Issue), Series 2009-A, 6.125% 2039 | 2,445 | 2,707 | ||||||
Health and Education Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Rivermead Issue), Series 2011-A, 6.875% 2041 | 2,625 | 2,958 | ||||||
Health and Education Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Southern New Hampshire Medical Center Issue), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 5.25% 2028 | 2,000 | 2,148 | ||||||
Health and Education Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Southern New Hampshire University Issue), | ||||||||
Series 2012, 5.00% 2042 | 2,000 | 2,113 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Healthcare System Rev. Bonds (Covenant Health Systems Obligated Group Issue), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 5.00% 2027 | 1,715 | 1,836 | ||||||
11,762 | ||||||||
NEW JERSEY — 3.13% | ||||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth., Energy Fac. Rev. Bonds (ACR Energy Partners, LLC Project), Series 2011-A, AMT, 10.50% 20321 | 13,000 | 14,384 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth., Retirement Community Rev. Ref. Bonds (Seabrook Village, Inc. Fac.), Series 2006, 5.25% 2026 | 4,060 | 4,165 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth., Retirement Community Rev. Ref. Bonds (Seabrook Village, Inc. Fac.), Series 2006, 5.25% 2036 | 500 | 505 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Provident Group — Montclair Properties LLC — | ||||||||
Montclair State University Student Housing Project), Series 2010-A, 5.875% 2042 | 2,500 | 2,775 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Crane’s Mill Project), Series 2005-A, 5.00% 2015 | 310 | 323 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth., School Facs. Construction Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-GG, 5.00% 2022 | 2,500 | 3,006 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth., Special Fac. Rev. Bonds (Continental Airlines, Inc. Project), Series 1999, AMT, 6.25% 2019 | 3,000 | 3,012 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth., Special Fac. Rev. Bonds (Continental Airlines, Inc. Project), Series 1999, AMT, 6.25% 2029 | 15,350 | 15,412 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth., Special Fac. Rev. Bonds (Continental Airlines, Inc. Project), Series 1999, AMT, 6.40% 2023 | 2,000 | 2,008 | ||||||
Health Care Facs. Fncg. Auth., Rev. and Ref. Bonds (Barnabas Health Issue), Series 2011-A, 5.625% 2032 | 500 | 550 | ||||||
Health Care Facs. Fncg. Auth., Rev. and Ref. Bonds (Barnabas Health Issue), Series 2011-A, 5.625% 2037 | 1,000 | 1,091 | ||||||
Health Care Facs. Fncg. Auth., Rev. and Ref. Bonds (Kennedy Health System Obligated Group Issue), | ||||||||
Series 2012, 5.00% 2037 | 500 | 543 | ||||||
Health Care Facs. Fncg. Auth., Rev. and Ref. Bonds (Kennedy Health System Obligated Group Issue), | ||||||||
Series 2012, 5.00% 2042 | 1,500 | 1,631 | ||||||
Health Care Facs. Fncg. Auth., Rev. Bonds (AHS Hospital Corp. Issue), Series 2011, 6.00% 2041 | 1,000 | 1,207 | ||||||
Health Care Facs. Fncg. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (St. Peter’s University Hospital), 6.00% 2026 | 2,000 | 2,303 | ||||||
Health Care Facs. Fncg. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (St. Peter’s University Hospital), 6.25% 2035 | 3,000 | 3,462 | ||||||
Higher Education Student Assistance Auth., Student Loan Rev. Bonds, Series 2011-A-1, AMT, 0.767% 20202 | 3,015 | 3,010 | ||||||
North Hudson Sewerage Auth., Gross Rev. Ref. Lease Certificates, Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2042 | 2,000 | 2,245 | ||||||
Tobacco Settlement Fncg. Corp., Tobacco Settlement Asset-backed Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2007-1-A, 4.625% 2026 | 2,000 | 1,821 | ||||||
Tobacco Settlement Fncg. Corp., Tobacco Settlement Asset-backed Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2007-1-A, 5.00% 2041 | 17,250 | 14,089 | ||||||
Transportation Trust Fund Auth., Transportation System Bonds (Capital Appreciation Bonds), Series 2010-A, 0% 2030 | 10,000 | 4,564 | ||||||
Transportation Trust Fund Auth., Transportation System Bonds (Capital Appreciation Bonds), Series 2010-A, 0% 2040 | 7,000 | 1,800 | ||||||
Transportation Trust Fund Auth., Transportation System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-D, 5.00% 2024 | 2,000 | 2,438 | ||||||
86,344 | ||||||||
NEW MEXICO — 0.42% | ||||||||
Dona Ana County, Improvement Dist. Bonds (Santa Teresa Improvement Dist.-Airport Road Business Center, Phase III), | ||||||||
Series 2001-A, 8.375% 2021 | 1,525 | 1,542 | ||||||
Dona Ana County, Improvement Dist. Bonds (Santa Teresa Improvement Dist.-Border Industrial Park, Phase I & II), | ||||||||
Series 2001-B, 8.875% 2021 | 3,890 | 3,951 | ||||||
Mortgage Fin. Auth., Single-family Mortgage Program Bonds, Series 2008-C, Class I, AMT, 6.95% 2039 | 1,055 | 1,097 | ||||||
Mortgage Fin. Auth., Single-family Mortgage Program Bonds, Series 2009-D, Class I, 5.35% 2040 | 475 | 510 | ||||||
Mortgage Fin. Auth., Single-family Mortgage Program Bonds, Series 2010-A, Class I, 4.625% 2025 | 550 | 579 | ||||||
Sandoval County, Incentive Payment Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2005, 5.00% 2020 | 3,500 | 3,801 | ||||||
11,480 | ||||||||
NEW YORK — 3.20% | ||||||||
County of Chautauqua Industrial Dev. Agcy., Exempt Fac. Rev. Bonds (NRG Dunkirk Power Project), | ||||||||
Series 2009, 5.875% 2042 | 600 | 676 | ||||||
Dormitory Auth. of the State of New York, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Obligated Group, Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2009-C, 5.00% 2039 | 2,060 | 2,252 | ||||||
Dormitory Auth. of the State of New York, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Obligated Group, Rev. Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2011-A, 5.00% 2032 | 4,500 | 5,050 | ||||||
Dormitory Auth., Mental Health Services Facs. Improvement Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-A, 5.00% 2024 | 1,590 | 1,892 | ||||||
Dormitory Auth., Orange Regional Medical Center Obligated Group Rev. Bonds, Series 2008, 6.25% 2037 | 1,120 | 1,233 | ||||||
Energy Research and Dev. Auth., Pollution Control Rev. Ref. Bonds (Electric & Gas Corp. Project), | ||||||||
Series 1994-B, 3.00% 2029 (put 2013) | 1,000 | 1,013 | ||||||
Environmental Facs. Corp., Solid Waste Disposal Rev. Ref. Bonds (Waste Management, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2012, AMT, 0.70% 2030 (put 2012)2 | 1,500 | 1,500 | ||||||
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., Rev. Bonds, Fiscal 2012 Series A, 5.25% 2047 | 2,500 | 2,812 | ||||||
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., Rev. Bonds, Fiscal 2012 Series A, 5.75% 2047 | 5,500 | 6,457 | ||||||
Liberty Dev. Corp., Liberty Rev. Ref. Bonds (4 World Trade Center Project), Series 2011, 5.00% 2044 | 3,250 | 3,616 | ||||||
Liberty Dev. Corp., Liberty Rev. Ref. Bonds (4 World Trade Center Project), Series 2011, 5.75% 2051 | 1,000 | 1,185 | ||||||
Liberty Dev. Corp., Liberty Rev. Ref. Bonds (Bank of America Tower at One Bryant Park Project), | ||||||||
Series 2010, 6.375% 2049 | 12,500 | 14,292 | ||||||
New York Liberty Dev. Corp., Liberty Rev. Ref. Bonds (7 World Trade Center Project), Series 2012, 5.00% 2043 | 3,000 | 3,317 | ||||||
New York City Housing Dev. Corp., Multi-family Housing Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-C, AMT, 5.00% 2026 | 1,250 | 1,306 | ||||||
New York City Housing Dev. Corp., Multi-family Housing Rev. Bonds, Series 2007-B-1, AMT, 5.05% 2022 | 1,500 | 1,616 | ||||||
New York City Housing Dev. Corp., Multi-family Housing Rev. Bonds, Series 2007-B-1, AMT, 5.125% 2032 | 1,000 | 1,053 | ||||||
New York City Housing Dev. Corp., Multi-family Housing Rev. Bonds, Series 2007-B-1, AMT, 5.15% 2037 | 500 | 524 | ||||||
New York City Industrial Dev. Agcy., Special Fac. Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(American Airlines, Inc. John F. Kennedy International Airport Project), Series 2005, AMT, 7.625% 20254 | 8,700 | 9,185 | ||||||
New York City Industrial Dev. Agcy., Special Fac. Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(American Airlines, Inc. John F. Kennedy International Airport Project), Series 2005, AMT, 8.00% 20284 | 2,000 | 2,133 | ||||||
New York City Industrial Dev. Agcy., Special Fac. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Terminal One Group Assn., LP Project), | ||||||||
Series 2005, AMT, 5.50% 2020 | 2,000 | 2,165 | ||||||
New York City Transitional Fin. Auth., Building Aid Rev. Bonds, Fiscal 2012 Series S-1-A, 5.00% 2032 | 750 | 866 | ||||||
New York City Transitional Fin. Auth., Future Tax Secured Bonds, Fiscal 2011 Series C, 5.00% 2039 | 1,000 | 1,142 | ||||||
Niagara County Industrial Dev. Agcy., Solid Waste Disposal Fac. Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(American Ref-Fuel Co. of Niagara, L.P. Fac.), Series 2001-D, 5.55% 2024 (put 2015) | 1,000 | 1,014 | ||||||
Port Auth., Special Project Bonds (JFK International Air Terminal LLC Project), Series 8, 6.00% 2036 | 1,605 | 1,829 | ||||||
Port Auth., Special Project Bonds (JFK International Air Terminal LLC Project), Series 8, 6.00% 2042 | 5,500 | 6,246 | ||||||
Seneca Nation of Indians, Rev. Bonds, Series A, 5.00% 20231 | 1,685 | 1,714 | ||||||
Seneca Nation of Indians, Rev. Bonds, Series A, 5.25% 20161 | 2,875 | 2,954 | ||||||
Suffolk County Industrial Dev. Agcy., Industrial Dev. Rev. Bonds (KeySpan-Port Jefferson Energy Center, LLC Project), | ||||||||
Series 2003-A, AMT, 5.25% 2027 | 8,220 | 8,477 | ||||||
TSASC, Inc., Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2006-1, 5.125% 2042 | 1,225 | 887 | ||||||
88,406 | ||||||||
NORTH CAROLINA — 0.16% | ||||||||
Eastern Municipal Power Agcy., Power System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 1993-B, 6.00% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,351 | ||||||
Medical Care Commission, Hospital Rev. Bonds (Maria Parham Medical Center), | ||||||||
Series 2003, RADIAN insured, 5.50% 2017 (preref. 2013) | 700 | 739 | ||||||
Medical Care Commission, Retirement Facs. First Mortgage Rev. Bonds (Carolina Village Project), | ||||||||
Series 2008-A, 6.00% 2038 | 2,230 | 2,342 | ||||||
4,432 | ||||||||
OHIO — 3.61% | ||||||||
Air Quality Dev. Auth., Air Quality Dev. Rev. Bonds (FirstEnergy Generation Corp. Project), Series 2009-A, 5.70% 2020 | 2,500 | 2,930 | ||||||
Air Quality Dev. Auth., Pollution Control Rev. Ref. Bonds (FirstEnergy Generation Corp. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2009-C, 5.625% 2018 | 8,580 | 9,975 | ||||||
Air Quality Dev. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Ohio Power Co. Project), Series 2010-A, 3.25% 2041 (put 2014) | 1,500 | 1,541 | ||||||
Akron, Bath and Copley Joint Township Hospital Dist., Hospital Facs. Rev. Bonds (Akron General Health System), | ||||||||
Series 2012, 5.00% 2031 | 4,000 | 4,223 | ||||||
County of Allen, Hospital Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Catholic Healthcare Partners), Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2033 | 3,315 | 3,712 | ||||||
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Fncg. Auth., Tobacco Settlement Asset-backed Bonds, Current Interest Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2007-A-2, 5.875% 2030 | 18,170 | 15,088 | ||||||
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Fncg. Auth., Tobacco Settlement Asset-backed Bonds, Current Interest Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2007-A-2, 5.875% 2047 | 8,710 | 7,075 | ||||||
County of Butler, Hospital Facs. Rev. Bonds (UC Health), Series 2010, 5.50% 2040 | 3,750 | 4,083 | ||||||
County of Butler, Hospital Facs. Rev. Bonds (UC Health), Series 2010, 5.75% 2040 | 1,000 | 1,112 | ||||||
City of Centerville, Health Care Rev. Ref. Bonds (Bethany Lutheran Village Continuing Care Fac. Expansion Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 6.00% 2038 | 1,000 | 1,037 | ||||||
City of Cleveland, Airport System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-A, 5.00% 2020 | 3,535 | 4,051 | ||||||
City of Cleveland, Airport System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2025 | 1,095 | 1,249 | ||||||
City of Cleveland, Airport System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,128 | ||||||
City of Cleveland, Airport System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2027 | 2,300 | 2,581 | ||||||
City of Cleveland, Airport System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2030 | 1,000 | 1,107 | ||||||
City of Cleveland, Airport System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2031 | 1,000 | 1,095 | ||||||
County of Cuyahoga, Health Care Facs. Rev. Bonds (Franciscan Communities, Inc.- Mount Alverna Project), | ||||||||
Series 2004-D, 6.50% 2034 | 1,315 | 1,373 | ||||||
County of Franklin, Health Care Facs. Improvement Rev. Bonds (Presbyterian Retirement Services Project), | ||||||||
Series 2010-A, 5.625% 2026 | 1,600 | 1,772 | ||||||
County of Gallia, Hospital Facs. Rev. Ref. and Improvement Bonds (Holzer Health System Obligated Group Project), | ||||||||
Series 2012-A, 8.00% 2042 | 11,000 | 12,311 | ||||||
County of Hamilton, Healthcare Facs. Rev. Bonds (The Christ Hospital Project), Series 2012, 5.00% 2042 | 2,500 | 2,622 | ||||||
County of Hamilton, Healthcare Rev. Bonds (Life Enriching Communities Project), Series 2011-A, 6.625% 2046 | 1,000 | 1,122 | ||||||
County of Hamilton, Healthcare Rev. Ref. Bonds (Life Enriching Communities Project), Series 2006-A, 5.00% 2016 | 1,685 | 1,820 | ||||||
County of Hamilton, Healthcare Rev. Ref. Bonds (Life Enriching Communities Project), Series 2006-A, 5.00% 2037 | 4,370 | 4,396 | ||||||
County of Hamilton, Hospital Facs. Rev. Bonds (Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center), | ||||||||
Series 2004-J, FGIC-National insured, 5.25% 2034 | 2,250 | 2,295 | ||||||
Hospital Rev. Bonds (University Hospitals Health System, Inc. Project), Series 2007-A, 4.50% 2031 | 2,000 | 2,055 | ||||||
Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Cleveland Clinic Health System Obligated Group), Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2038 | 1,000 | 1,116 | ||||||
Housing Fin. Agcy., Residential Mortgage Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-E, AMT, 5.375% 2037 | 635 | 669 | ||||||
Housing Fin. Agcy., Residential Mortgage Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2005-A, AMT, 4.30% 2015 | 750 | 782 | ||||||
County of Lake, Hospital Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Lake Hospital System, Inc.), Series 2008-C, 5.625% 2029 | 2,000 | 2,138 | ||||||
Southeastern Ohio Port Auth., Hospital Facs. Rev. Ref. and Improvement Bonds | ||||||||
(Memorial Health System Obligated Group Project), Series 2012, 6.00% 2042 | 3,200 | 3,387 | ||||||
99,845 | ||||||||
OKLAHOMA — 0.37% | ||||||||
Fort Sill Apache Ok Tribe Gaming Enterprise, Econ. Dev. Auth., Series 2011-A, 8.50% 20261 | 6,500 | 6,933 | ||||||
Housing Fin. Agcy., Single-family Mortgage Rev. Bonds (Homeownership Loan Program), | ||||||||
Series 2008-A, AMT, 6.80% 2038 | 1,230 | 1,340 | ||||||
Langston Econ. Dev. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Langston University Student Housing/LDF Student Housing, LLC Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, ACA insured, 4.75% 2021 | 500 | 520 | ||||||
Tulsa Industrial Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (University of Tulsa), Series 2009, 6.00% 2027 | 1,285 | 1,504 | ||||||
10,297 | ||||||||
OREGON — 0.49% | ||||||||
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, Tax-Exempt Tax Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-C, 5.625% 2026 | 8,165 | 7,511 | ||||||
Oregon Facs. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Bonds (CHF-Ashland, L.L.C. — Southern Oregon University Project), | ||||||||
Series 2012, Assured Guaranty insured, 5.00% 2044 | 1,500 | 1,613 | ||||||
Port of Portland, Portland International Airport Rev. Bonds, Subseries 20-C, AMT, 5.00% 2028 | 4,000 | 4,543 | ||||||
13,667 | ||||||||
PENNSYLVANIA — 4.35% | ||||||||
Allegheny County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Bonds, Series 2012-A-1, AMT, 5.00% 2025 | 2,705 | 3,066 | ||||||
Allegheny County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Bonds, Series 2012-A-1, AMT, 5.00% 2026 | 2,000 | 2,243 | ||||||
Allegheny County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Bonds, Series 2012-A-1, AMT, 5.00% 2028 | 500 | 553 | ||||||
Allegheny County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds (Pittsburgh International Airport), | ||||||||
Series 2002-B, AMT, FGIC insured, 5.00% 2017 | 2,500 | 2,809 | ||||||
Allegheny County Hospital Dev. Auth., Health System Rev. Ref. Bonds (West Penn Allegheny Health System), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 5.00% 2028 | 5,500 | 4,649 | ||||||
Allegheny County Hospital Dev. Auth., Health System Rev. Ref. Bonds (West Penn Allegheny Health System), | ||||||||
Series 2007-A, 5.375% 2040 | 5,500 | 4,515 | ||||||
Bucks County Industrial Dev. Auth., Retirement Community Rev. Bonds (Ann’s Choice, Inc. Fac.), | ||||||||
Series 2005-A, 5.20% 2013 | 330 | 332 | ||||||
Bucks County Industrial Dev. Auth., Retirement Community Rev. Bonds (Ann’s Choice, Inc. Fac.), | ||||||||
Series 2005-A, 5.30% 2014 | 275 | 279 | ||||||
Bucks County Industrial Dev. Auth., Retirement Community Rev. Bonds (Ann’s Choice, Inc. Fac.), | ||||||||
Series 2005-A, 6.125% 2025 | 6,315 | 6,409 | ||||||
Bucks County Industrial Dev. Auth., Retirement Community Rev. Bonds (Ann’s Choice, Inc. Fac.), | ||||||||
Series 2005-A, 6.25% 2035 | 6,850 | 6,934 | ||||||
Dauphin County General Auth., Health System Rev. Bonds (Pinnacle Health System Project), | ||||||||
Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2042 | 3,000 | 3,241 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Fncg. Auth., Exempt Facs. Rev. Bonds (Allegheny Energy Supply Co., LLC Project), | ||||||||
Series 2009, 7.00% 2039 | 5,500 | 6,526 | ||||||
Higher Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Edinboro University Foundation Student Housing Project), | ||||||||
Series 2008, 5.75% 2028 | 2,500 | 2,730 | ||||||
Higher Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Edinboro University Foundation Student Housing Project), | ||||||||
Series 2008, 5.875% 2038 | 3,200 | 3,492 | ||||||
Higher Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Edinboro University Foundation Student Housing Project), | ||||||||
Series 2008, 6.00% 2042 | 1,000 | 1,097 | ||||||
Higher Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Edinboro University Foundation Student Housing Project), | ||||||||
Series 2010, 6.00% 2043 | 3,500 | 3,933 | ||||||
Higher Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Foundation for Indiana University of Pennsylvania Student Housing Project | ||||||||
at Indiana University of Pennsylvania), Series 2007-A, XLCA insured, 0.959% 20392 | 2,000 | 1,137 | ||||||
Higher Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Foundation for Indiana University of Pennsylvania Student Housing | ||||||||
Project at Indiana University of Pennsylvania), Series 2012-B, 5.00% 2041 | 2,200 | 2,304 | ||||||
Higher Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Shippensburg University Student Services, Inc. Student Housing Project | ||||||||
at Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania), Series 2011, 6.25% 2043 | 4,000 | 4,482 | ||||||
Higher Educational Facs. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Bonds (University Properties, Inc. Student Housing Project | ||||||||
at East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania), Series 2010, 5.00% 2031 | 2,370 | 2,501 | ||||||
Higher Educational Facs. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Bonds (University Properties, Inc. Student Housing Project | ||||||||
at East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania), Series 2010, 5.00% 2042 | 5,890 | 6,128 | ||||||
Higher Educational Facs. Auth., University of Pennsylvania Health System, Rev. Bonds, Series 2011-A, 5.75% 2041 | 1,500 | 1,763 | ||||||
Housing Fin. Agcy., Single-family Mortgage Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-93-A, AMT, 5.75% 2037 | 310 | 321 | ||||||
Lycoming County Auth., Health System Rev. Bonds (Susquehanna Health System Project), Series 2009-A, 5.75% 2039 | 1,500 | 1,651 | ||||||
Monroeville Fin. Auth. (Allegheny County), UPMC Rev. Bonds, Series 2012, 5.00% 2042 | 2,000 | 2,214 | ||||||
Montgomery County Industrial Dev. Auth., Mortgage Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Whitemarsh Continuing Care Retirement Community Project), Series 2005, 6.00% 2021 | 1,000 | 1,025 | ||||||
Montgomery County Industrial Dev. Auth., Mortgage Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Whitemarsh Continuing Care Retirement Community Project), Series 2005, 6.125% 2028 | 2,000 | 2,042 | ||||||
Montgomery County Industrial Dev. Auth., Mortgage Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Whitemarsh Continuing Care Retirement Community Project), Series 2005, 6.25% 2035 | 2,000 | 2,036 | ||||||
Montgomery County Industrial Dev. Auth., Mortgage Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Whitemarsh Continuing Care Retirement Community Project), Series 2008, 7.00% 2036 | 2,000 | 2,140 | ||||||
Montgomery County Industrial Dev. Auth., Retirement Communities Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(ACTS Retirement — Life Communities, Inc. Obligated Group), Series 2009-A-1, 6.25% 2029 | 725 | 843 | ||||||
Montgomery County Industrial Dev. Auth., Retirement Communities Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(ACTS Retirement — Life Communities, Inc. Obligated Group), Series 2006-B, 5.00% 2022 | 2,610 | 2,793 | ||||||
Montgomery County Industrial Dev. Auth., Retirement Communities Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(ACTS Retirement — Life Communities, Inc. Obligated Group), Series 2012, 5.00% 2025 | 700 | 776 | ||||||
Montgomery County Industrial Dev. Auth., Retirement Communities Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(ACTS Retirement — Life Communities, Inc. Obligated Group), Series 2012, 5.00% 2027 | 4,200 | 4,586 | ||||||
Montgomery County Industrial Dev. Auth., Retirement Communities Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(ACTS Retirement — Life Communities, Inc. Obligated Group), Series 2012, 5.00% 2028 | 1,950 | 2,121 | ||||||
Hospitals and Higher Education Facs. Auth. of Philadelphia, Hospital Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Temple University Health System Obligated Group), Series 2012-A, 5.625% 2042 | 12,295 | 12,885 | ||||||
Hospitals and Higher Education Facs. Auth. of Philadelphia, Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Temple University Health System Obligated Group), Series 2007-A, 5.00% 2034 | 1,000 | 1,003 | ||||||
Hospitals and Higher Education Facs. Auth. of Philadelphia, Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Temple University Hospital), Series 2007-B, 5.00% 2017 | 4,000 | 4,252 | ||||||
Redev. Auth. of the County of Washington, Redev. Bonds (Victory Centre Project — Tanger Outlet Dev.), | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, 5.45% 2035 | 5,460 | 5,599 | ||||||
Westmoreland County Industrial Dev. Auth., Retirement Community Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare Obligated Group), Series 2005-A, 5.50% 2015 | 1,200 | 1,255 | ||||||
Westmoreland County Industrial Dev. Auth., Retirement Community Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare Obligated Group), Series 2005-A, 5.875% 2032 | 1,400 | 1,433 | ||||||
120,098 | ||||||||
PUERTO RICO — 0.64% | ||||||||
Aqueduct and Sewer Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-A, 5.125% 2037 | 2,400 | 2,437 | ||||||
Aqueduct and Sewer Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-A, 5.25% 2042 | 3,500 | 3,588 | ||||||
Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Control Facs. Fncg. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Hospital Auxilio Mutuo Obligated Group Project), Series 2011-A, 6.00% 2033 | 4,150 | 4,719 | ||||||
Public Fin. Corp., Commonwealth Appropriation Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-B, 5.50% 2031 | 1,500 | 1,643 | ||||||
Public Improvement Ref. Bonds (G.O. Bonds), Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2041 | 2,000 | 2,024 | ||||||
Public Improvement Ref. Bonds (G.O. Bonds), Series 2012-A, 5.50% 2039 | 500 | 528 | ||||||
Sales Tax Fncg. Corp., Sales Tax Rev. Bonds, Series 2010-A, 0% 2033 | 1,000 | 329 | ||||||
Sales Tax Fncg. Corp., Sales Tax Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2007-A, FGIC-National insured, 0% 2040 | 5,000 | 1,088 | ||||||
Sales Tax Fncg. Corp., Sales Tax Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2007-A, National insured, 0% 2044 | 8,000 | 1,382 | ||||||
17,738 | ||||||||
RHODE ISLAND — 0.03% | ||||||||
Health and Educational Building Corp., Hospital Fncg. Rev. Bonds (Lifespan Obligated Group Issue), | ||||||||
Series 2002, 6.375% 2021 (preref. 2012) | 870 | 872 | ||||||
SOUTH CAROLINA — 0.76% | ||||||||
Jobs-Econ. Dev. Auth., First Mortgage Health Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Wesley Commons Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.00% 2016 | 1,850 | 1,920 | ||||||
Jobs-Econ. Dev. Auth., First Mortgage Health Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Wesley Commons Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.125% 2026 | 2,000 | 2,004 | ||||||
Jobs-Econ. Dev. Auth., First Mortgage Health Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Wesley Commons Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.30% 2036 | 2,015 | 1,971 | ||||||
Jobs-Econ. Dev. Auth., Student Housing Rev. Bonds (Coastal Housing Foundation, LLC Project), | ||||||||
Series 2009-A, 6.50% 2042 | 6,000 | 6,702 | ||||||
City of Myrtle Beach, Tax Increment Bonds (Myrtle Beach Air Force Base Redev. Project Area), | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, 5.25% 2026 | 1,865 | 1,688 | ||||||
City of Myrtle Beach, Tax Increment Bonds (Myrtle Beach Air Force Base Redev. Project Area), | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, 5.30% 2035 | 4,000 | 3,442 | ||||||
Richland County, Environmental Improvement Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series A, AMT, 6.10% 2023 | 960 | 997 | ||||||
SCAGO Educational Facs. Corp. for Union School Dist., Installment Purchase Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(School Dist. of Union County Project), Series 2006, RADIAN insured, 5.00% 2021 | 2,000 | 2,137 | ||||||
20,861 | ||||||||
TENNESSEE — 0.90% | ||||||||
Health, Educational and Housing Fac. Board of the City of Chattanooga, Rev. Ref. Bonds (CDFI Phase I, LLC Project), | ||||||||
Series 2005-A, 5.00% 2015 | 1,535 | 1,613 | ||||||
Natural Gas Acquisition Corp. of the City of Clarksville, Gas Rev. Bonds, Series 2006, 5.00% 2016 | 2,500 | 2,689 | ||||||
Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Project Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-C, 5.00% 2016 | 5,000 | 5,383 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Board of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, | ||||||||
Rev. Ref. and Improvement Bonds (The Blakeford at Green Hills), Series 2012, 5.00% 2032 | 1,350 | 1,435 | ||||||
Memphis-Shelby County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-B, AMT, 5.375% 2018 | 2,000 | 2,349 | ||||||
Memphis-Shelby County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-B, AMT, 5.50% 2019 | 2,500 | 2,990 | ||||||
Memphis-Shelby County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-B, AMT, 5.625% 2020 | 1,685 | 2,046 | ||||||
Memphis-Shelby County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-B, AMT, 5.75% 2024 | 1,000 | 1,171 | ||||||
Memphis-Shelby County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-B, AMT, 5.75% 2025 | 1,000 | 1,164 | ||||||
Memphis-Shelby County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-A-1, AMT, 6.00% 2021 | 1,495 | 1,864 | ||||||
Memphis-Shelby County Airport Auth., Airport Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2011-A-1, AMT, 6.00% 2022 | 1,000 | 1,237 | ||||||
Health, Educational and Housing Facs. Board of the County of Sullivan, Hospital Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Wellmont Health System Project), Series 2002, 6.25% 2022 (preref. 2012) | 625 | 634 | ||||||
Health, Educational and Housing Facs. Board of the County of Sullivan, Hospital Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Wellmont Health System Project), Series 2002, 6.25% 2022 (preref. 2012) | 375 | 381 | ||||||
24,956 | ||||||||
TEXAS — 7.21% | ||||||||
Brazos River Harbor Navigation Dist. of Brazoria County, Environmental Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Dow Chemical Co. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2002-A-3, AMT, 5.125% 2033 | 5,000 | 5,231 | ||||||
Brazos River Harbor Navigation Dist. of Brazoria County, Environmental Facs. Rev. Ref. Bonds (Dow Chemical Co. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2002-A-4, AMT, 5.95% 2033 | 13,220 | 14,779 | ||||||
Central Texas Regional Mobility Auth., Rev. Bonds, Series 2011, 6.00% 2041 | 3,000 | 3,481 | ||||||
Central Texas Regional Mobility Auth., Rev. Bonds, Series 2011, 6.25% 2046 | 2,200 | 2,558 | ||||||
Central Texas Regional Mobility Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010, 5.75% 2025 | 2,500 | 2,880 | ||||||
HFDC of Central Texas, Inc., Retirement Fac. Rev. Bonds (Legacy at Willow Bend Project), Series 2006-A, 5.625% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,015 | ||||||
HFDC of Central Texas, Inc., Retirement Fac. Rev. Bonds (Village at Gleannloch Farms, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, 5.50% 2027 | 1,150 | 1,048 | ||||||
HFDC of Central Texas, Inc., Retirement Fac. Rev. Bonds (Village at Gleannloch Farms, Inc. Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, 5.50% 2037 | 1,850 | 1,563 | ||||||
Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Joint Rev. Improvement Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2012-D, AMT, 5.00% 2042 | 6,500 | 7,016 | ||||||
Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Fac. Improvement Corp., American Airlines, Inc. Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 1999, AMT, 6.375% 20354 | 22,250 | 10,377 | ||||||
Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Fac. Improvement Corp., American Airlines, Inc. Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2002, AMT, 8.25% 20364 | 1,580 | 1,030 | ||||||
Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Auth., Solid Waste Disposal Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Waste Management of Texas, Inc. Travis County Project), Series 2003-C, AMT, 5.20% 2028 | 1,500 | 1,601 | ||||||
Harris County Health Facs. Dev. Corp., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Memorial Hermann Healthcare System), | ||||||||
Series 2008-B, 7.25% 2035 | 3,500 | 4,258 | ||||||
Harris County Industrial Dev. Corp., Solid Waste Disposal Rev. Bonds (Deer Park Refining Limited Partnership Project), | ||||||||
Series 2006, 5.00% 2023 | 3,500 | 3,854 | ||||||
Hidalgo County Health Services Corp., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Mission Hospital, Inc. Project), Series 2008, 5.00% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,031 | ||||||
Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs, Residential Mortgage Rev. Bonds, Series 2009-A, 5.375% 2039 | 855 | 888 | ||||||
City of Houston, Airport System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-A, AMT, 5.00% 2032 | 3,000 | 3,320 | ||||||
City of Houston, Airport System Special Facs. Rev. Bonds (Continental Airlines, Inc. Terminal E Project), | ||||||||
Series 2001, AMT, 6.75% 2021 | 3,000 | 3,011 | ||||||
City of Houston, Airport System Special Facs. Rev. Bonds (Continental Airlines, Inc. Terminal E Project), | ||||||||
Series 2001, AMT, 6.75% 2029 | 13,100 | 13,153 | ||||||
City of Houston, Airport System Special Facs. Rev. Bonds (Continental Airlines, Inc. Terminal Improvement Projects), | ||||||||
Series 2011, AMT, 6.50% 2030 | 9,300 | 10,247 | ||||||
City of Houston, Airport System Special Facs. Rev. Bonds (Continental Airlines, Inc. Terminal Improvement Projects), | ||||||||
Series 2011, AMT, 6.625% 2038 | �� | 3,000 | 3,287 | |||||
La Vernia Higher Education Fin. Corp., Education Rev. Bonds (KIPP, Inc.), Series 2009-A, 6.375% 2044 | 1,000 | 1,170 | ||||||
Love Field Airport Modernization Corp., Special Facs. Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Southwest Airlines Co. — Love Field Modernization Program Project), Series 2010, 5.25% 2040 | 3,750 | 4,057 | ||||||
Lubbock Educational Facs. Auth., Inc., Rev. Ref. and Improvement Bonds (Lubbock Christian University), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.125% 2027 | 2,500 | 2,611 | ||||||
Lubbock Educational Facs. Auth., Inc., Rev. Ref. and Improvement Bonds (Lubbock Christian University), | ||||||||
Series 2007, 5.25% 2037 | 1,000 | 1,030 | ||||||
Matagorda County Navigation Dist. Number One, Rev. Ref. Bonds (Houston Lighting & Power Co. Project), | ||||||||
Series 1997, AMT, AMBAC insured, 5.125% 2028 | 2,800 | 3,191 | ||||||
Midlothian Dev. Auth., Tax Increment Contract Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2007-B, 5.125% 2026 | 815 | 818 | ||||||
Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corp. I, Gas Supply Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-A, 5.00% 2016 | 1,000 | 1,076 | ||||||
Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corp. I, Gas Supply Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-A, 5.25% 2017 | 2,500 | 2,720 | ||||||
Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corp. I, Gas Supply Rev. Bonds, Series 2006-A, 5.25% 2018 | 2,000 | 2,189 | ||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Current Interest Bonds, Series 2008-A, 5.625% 2033 | 2,000 | 2,235 | ||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Current Interest Bonds, Series 2008-A, 6.00% 2021 | 1,000 | 1,196 | ||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Insured Capital Appreciation Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2008-D, Assured Guaranty insured, 0% 2028 | 920 | 478 | ||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2008-F, 5.75% 2033 | 4,000 | 4,427 | ||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2008-F, 5.75% 2038 | 6,000 | 6,597 | ||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2009-A, 6.00% 2028 | 3,000 | 3,548 | ||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010, 6.00% 2034 | 1,500 | 1,792 | ||||||
North Texas Tollway Auth., System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2012-B, 5.00% 2042 | 7,000 | 7,598 | ||||||
Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., Rev. Bonds (LBJ Infrastructure Group LLC IH-635 | ||||||||
Managed Lanes Project), Series 2010, 7.00% 2040 | 7,250 | 8,873 | ||||||
Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., Rev. Bonds (NTE Mobility Partners LLC North Tarrant Express | ||||||||
Managed Lanes Project), Series 2009, 6.875% 2039 | 7,000 | 8,425 | ||||||
SA Energy Acquisition Public Fac. Corp., Gas Supply Rev. Bonds, Series 2007, 5.50% 2019 | 3,000 | 3,386 | ||||||
SA Energy Acquisition Public Fac. Corp., Gas Supply Rev. Bonds, Series 2007, 5.50% 2020 | 1,000 | 1,137 | ||||||
SA Energy Acquisition Public Fac. Corp., Gas Supply Rev. Bonds, Series 2007, 5.50% 2025 | 2,000 | 2,238 | ||||||
SA Energy Acquisition Public Fac. Corp., Gas Supply Rev. Bonds, Series 2007, 5.50% 2027 | 1,360 | 1,508 | ||||||
Sam Rayburn Municipal Power Agcy., Power Supply System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2002, 6.00% 2021 | 750 | 754 | ||||||
Sam Rayburn Municipal Power Agcy., Power Supply System Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2002, RADIAN insured, 5.125% 2017 | 2,000 | 2,010 | ||||||
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facs. Fin. Corp., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Scott and White Memorial Hospital and Scott, | ||||||||
Sherwood and Brindley Foundation Project), Series 2008-A, 5.00% 2019 | 1,370 | 1,583 | ||||||
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facs. Fin. Corp., Retirement Fac. Rev. Bonds (Stayton at Museum Way Project), | ||||||||
Series 2009-A, 8.00% 2028 | 1,000 | 1,128 | ||||||
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facs. Fin. Corp., Retirement Fac. Rev. Bonds (Stayton at Museum Way Project), | ||||||||
Series 2009-A, 8.25% 2044 | 7,100 | 7,978 | ||||||
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facs. Fin. Corp., Retirement Fac. Rev. Bonds (Stayton at Museum Way Project), | ||||||||
Series 2009-C-2, 6.50% 2014 | 565 | 566 | ||||||
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facs. Fin. Corp., Retirement Fac. Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Buckner Retirement Services, Inc. Project), Series 2007, 5.25% 2022 | 1,855 | 2,004 | ||||||
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facs. Fin. Corp., Retirement Fac. Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Buckner Retirement Services, Inc. Project), Series 2007, 5.25% 2027 | 1,000 | 1,049 | ||||||
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facs. Fin. Corp., Retirement Fac. Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Northwest Senior Housing Corp. — Edgemere Project), Series 2006-A, 6.00% 2026 | 2,200 | 2,340 | ||||||
Tomball Hospital Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2005, 5.00% 2020 (preref. 2015) | 1,660 | 1,882 | ||||||
Travis County Health Facs. Dev. Corp., Retirement Fac. Rev. Bonds (Querencia at Barton Creek Project), | ||||||||
Series 2005-A, 5.50% 2025 | 145 | 147 | ||||||
Travis County Health Facs. Dev. Corp., Retirement Fac. Rev. Bonds (Querencia at Barton Creek Project), | ||||||||
Series 2005-A, 5.65% 2035 | 2,000 | 2,012 | ||||||
Travis County Health Facs. Dev. Corp., Rev. Bonds (Westminster Manor Project), Series 2010, 7.00% 2030 | 3,000 | 3,555 | ||||||
Travis County Health Facs. Dev. Corp., Rev. Bonds (Westminster Manor Project), Series 2010, 7.125% 2040 | 3,750 | 4,405 | ||||||
199,341 | ||||||||
UTAH — 0.28% | ||||||||
Housing Corp., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2001-E-1, Class III, AMT, 5.20% 2018 | 500 | 502 | ||||||
Housing Corp., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2001-F-1, Class III, AMT, 4.95% 2018 | 540 | 546 | ||||||
Housing Corp., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2002-A-1, Class III, AMT, 5.30% 2018 | 245 | 247 | ||||||
Housing Corp., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2002-C-2, Class III, AMT, 5.25% 2018 | 875 | 887 | ||||||
Housing Corp., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2002-D-2, Class III, AMT, 5.00% 2018 | 400 | 401 | ||||||
Housing Corp., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2002-F-1, Class III, AMT, 4.625% 2019 | 455 | 459 | ||||||
Housing Corp., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2002-G-2, Class III, AMT, 4.875% 2019 | 485 | 496 | ||||||
Housing Corp., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2003-B-2, Class III, AMT, 4.85% 2024 | 635 | 638 | ||||||
Housing Corp., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2003-C, Class III, AMT, 5.00% 2025 | 385 | 387 | ||||||
Housing Corp., Single-family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2007-B-1, Class III, AMT, 4.85% 2027 | 900 | 934 | ||||||
Housing Corp., Single-family Mortgage Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2002-E-2, Class III, AMT, 4.95% 2019 | 400 | 401 | ||||||
Housing Corp., Single-family Mortgage Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2004-H-1, Class III, AMT, 4.75% 2027 | 490 | 499 | ||||||
Salt Lake County, College Rev. Ref. Bonds (Westminster College Project), Series 2007, 5.00% 2024 | 1,150 | 1,210 | ||||||
7,607 | ||||||||
VIRGINIA — 1.60% | ||||||||
Celebrate Virginia South Community Dev. Auth., City of Fredericksburg, Special Assessment Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Celebrate Virginia South Project), Series 2006, 6.25% 2037 | 4,582 | 2,843 | ||||||
Fairfax County Econ. Dev. Auth., Retirement Community Rev. Ref. Bonds (Greenspring Village, Inc. Fac.), | ||||||||
Series 2006-A, 4.75% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,046 | ||||||
Mosaic Dist. Community Dev. Auth. (Fairfax County), Rev. Bonds, Series 2011-A, 6.875% 2036 | 1,000 | 1,118 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth. of Henrico County, Residential Care Fac. Mortgage Rev. Bonds (United Methodist Homes), 5.00% 2025 | 385 | 411 | ||||||
Heritage Hunt Commercial Community Dev. Auth. (Prince William County), Special Assessment Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 1999-B, 7.00% 2029 | 645 | 646 | ||||||
Community Dev. Auth. of Loudoun County, Special Assessment Bonds (Dulles Town Center Project), | ||||||||
Series 1998, 6.25% 2026 | 3,520 | 3,524 | ||||||
Peninsula Town Center Community Dev. Auth., Special Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 6.45% 2037 | 3,550 | 3,770 | ||||||
Small Business Fncg. Auth., Rev. Bonds (95 Express Lanes LLC Project), Series 2012, AMT, 5.00% 2034 | 1,000 | 1,065 | ||||||
Small Business Fncg. Auth., Rev. Bonds (95 Express Lanes LLC Project), Series 2012, AMT, 5.00% 2040 | 3,000 | 3,171 | ||||||
Small Business Fncg. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Elizabeth River Crossings Opco, LLC Project), Series 2012, AMT, 5.25% 2032 | 3,500 | 3,799 | ||||||
Small Business Fncg. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Elizabeth River Crossings Opco, LLC Project), Series 2012, AMT, 5.50% 2042 | 15,000 | 16,581 | ||||||
Small Business Fncg. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Elizabeth River Crossings Opco, LLC Project), Series 2012, AMT, 6.00% 2037 | 2,000 | 2,291 | ||||||
Small Business Fncg. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Hampton Roads Proton Beam Therapy Institute at Hampton University, | ||||||||
LLC Project), Series 2009, 9.00% 2039 | 3,600 | 3,907 | ||||||
44,172 | ||||||||
VIRGIN ISLANDS — 0.52% | ||||||||
Public Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Matching Fund Loan Note — Diageo Project), Series 2009-A, 6.625% 2029 | 2,500 | 2,946 | ||||||
Public Fin. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Matching Fund Loan Note), Series 2010-A, 5.00% 2029 | 500 | 547 | ||||||
Public Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Matching Fund Loan Notes), Series 2009-B, 5.00% 2018 | 2,000 | 2,247 | ||||||
Public Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Matching Fund Loan Notes), Series 2009-B, 5.00% 2025 | 2,250 | 2,474 | ||||||
Public Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Matching Fund Loan Notes), Series 2009-C, 5.00% 2015 | 2,000 | 2,159 | ||||||
Public Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Matching Fund Loan Notes), Series 2009-C, 5.00% 2022 | 3,530 | 3,892 | ||||||
14,265 | ||||||||
WASHINGTON — 0.54% | ||||||||
Health Care Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Virginia Mason Medical Center), Series 2007-A, 6.125% 2037 | 8,000 | 8,698 | ||||||
Housing Fin. Commission, Single-family Program Bonds, Series 2007-2A, AMT, 4.50% 2021 | 4,730 | 4,998 | ||||||
Port of Seattle, Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2010-C, AMT, 5.00% 2024 | 1,000 | 1,157 | ||||||
14,853 | ||||||||
WEST VIRGINIA — 0.21% | ||||||||
County Commission of Harrison County, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Allegheny Energy Supply Co., LLC Harrison Station Project), Series 2007-D, AMT, 5.50% 2037 | 5,000 | 5,251 | ||||||
West Virginia Econ. Dev. Auth., Solid Waste Disposal Facs. Rev. Bonds (Appalachian Power Co. — Amos Project), | ||||||||
Series 2011-A, AMT, 2.25% 2041 (put 2016) | 625 | 625 | ||||||
5,876 | ||||||||
WISCONSIN — 0.40% | ||||||||
General Fund Annual Appropriation Rev. Ref. Bonds, Series 2009-A, 6.00% 2036 | 1,500 | 1,867 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Aurora Health Care, Inc.), Series 2012-A, 5.00% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,120 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Froedtert & Community Health Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2001, 5.625% 2013 | 90 | 91 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Gundersen Lutheran), Series 2011-A, 5.25% 2039 | 2,000 | 2,201 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Milwaukee Catholic Home, Inc.), Series 2006, 5.00% 2026 | 1,000 | 1,039 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Saint John’s Communities, Inc.), Series 2009-A, 7.25% 2029 | 1,000 | 1,152 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Saint John’s Communities, Inc.), Series 2009-A, 7.625% 2039 | 3,000 | 3,487 | ||||||
10,957 | ||||||||
MULTI-STATE — 0.31% | ||||||||
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary, LLC, Series A-2, AMT, 4.90% cumulative preferred (undated)1 | 4,000 | 3,360 | ||||||
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary, LLC, Series A-3, AMT, 4.95% cumulative preferred (undated)1 | 4,000 | 3,480 | ||||||
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary, LLC, Series A-4, AMT, 5.125% cumulative preferred (undated)1 | 2,000 | 1,700 | ||||||
8,540 | ||||||||
Total bonds & notes (cost: $2,441,620,000) | 2,605,138 | |||||||
Short-term securities — 5.64% | ||||||||
California Statewide Communities Dev. Auth., Multi-family Housing Rev. Bonds (IAC Project), | ||||||||
Series 2001-W-1, AMT, Wells Fargo Bank LOC, 0.17% 20342 | 1,100 | 1,100 | ||||||
California Infrastructure and Econ. Dev. Bank, Rev. Ref. Bonds (J. Paul Getty Trust), Series 2007-A-2, 0.13% 20472 | 1,765 | 1,765 | ||||||
State of California, Pollution Control Fncg. Auth., Pollution Control Rev. Ref. Bonds (Pacific Gas and Electric Co.), | ||||||||
Series 1997-B, AMT, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.20% 20262 | 3,300 | 3,300 | ||||||
Colorado Educational and Cultural Facs. Auth., Demand Rev. Bonds (National Jewish Federation Bond Program), | ||||||||
Series C-5, U.S. Bank LOC, 0.17% 20372 | 425 | 425 | ||||||
Colorado Educational and Cultural Facs. Auth., Demand Rev. Ref. Bonds (National Jewish Federation Bond Program), | ||||||||
Series D-1, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.17% 20362 | 7,110 | 7,110 | ||||||
Colorado Educational and Cultural Facs. Auth., Demand Rev. Bonds (National Jewish Federation Bond Program), | ||||||||
Series D-5, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.17% 20382 | 5,400 | 5,400 | ||||||
State of Colorado, General Fund Tax and Rev. Anticipation Notes, Series 2012-A, 2.00% 6/27/2013 | 6,000 | 6,100 | ||||||
State of Colorado, General Fund Tax and Rev. Anticipation Notes, Series 2012-A, 2.50% 6/27/2013 | 4,000 | 4,085 | ||||||
State of Connecticut Health and Educational Facs. Auth., Rev. Bonds (Yale-New Haven Hospital Issue), | ||||||||
Series K-1, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.15% 20252 | 2,975 | 2,975 | ||||||
State of Florida, Broward County Educational Facs. Auth., Educational Facs. Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Nova Southeastern University Project), Series 2008-A, Bank of America LOC, 0.19% 20382 | 1,850 | 1,850 | ||||||
State of Florida, Jacksonville Health Facs. Auth., Hospital Rev. Bonds (Baptist Medical Center Project), | ||||||||
Series 2007-B, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.17% 20332 | 3,550 | 3,550 | ||||||
School Board of Orange County, Florida, Certs. of Part., Series 2008-E, Wells Fargo Bank LOC, 0.18% 20222 | 1,650 | 1,650 | ||||||
Sarasota County, Florida, Public Hospital Dist., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Sarasota Memorial Hospital Project), | ||||||||
Series 2009-B, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.17% 20372 | 4,000 | 4,000 | ||||||
City of Chicago, Illinois, G.O. Ref. Bonds, Series 2007-F, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.17% 20422 | 5,600 | 5,600 | ||||||
Illinois Fin. Auth., Demand Rev. Ref. Bonds (Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare), | ||||||||
Series 2008-B, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.17% 20482 | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||||||
Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Illinois, Unlimited Tax G.O. Ref. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2009-B, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.17% 20312 | 6,035 | 6,035 | ||||||
Illinois Fin. Auth., Demand Rev. Bonds (Provena Health), Series 2010-C, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.17% 20452 | 4,845 | 4,845 | ||||||
Iowa Fin. Auth., Demand Health Facs. Rev. Bonds (Iowa Health System), | ||||||||
Series 2009-B, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.17% 20352 | 2,700 | 2,700 | ||||||
Iowa Fin. Auth., Health Facs. Rev. Bonds (Iowa Health System), Series 2009-A, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.17% 20352 | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||||||
County of Breckinridge, Kentucky, Assn. of Counties Leasing Trust, Lease Program Rev. Bonds, | ||||||||
Series 2002-A, U.S. Bank LOC, 0.17% 20322 | 1,050 | 1,050 | ||||||
Kentucky Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth., Demand Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (Baptist Healthcare System Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2009-B-1, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.17% 20382 | 3,100 | 3,100 | ||||||
Parish of St. Bernard, Louisiana, Exempt Fac. Rev. Bonds (Mobil Oil Corp. Project), Series 1996, AMT, 0.16% 20262 | 3,800 | 3,800 | ||||||
Washington Suburban Sanitary Dist., Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties, | ||||||||
Maryland, G.O. Multi-Modal Bond Anticipation Notes, Series 2006-A, 0.21% 20232 | 1,200 | 1,200 | ||||||
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, G.O. Demand Bonds, Consolidated Loan of 2006, Series B, 0.17% 20262 | 5,240 | 5,240 | ||||||
Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, General Rev. Bonds, Series 2000-A, 0.15% 20302 | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||||||
Mississippi Business Fin. Corporation, Gulf Opportunity Zone Industrial Dev. Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Project), 0.15% 20302 | 1,700 | 1,700 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth. of the State of Missouri, Demand Educational Facs. Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Washington University), Series 1996-A, 0.17% 20302 | 1,200 | 1,200 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth. of the State of Missouri, Demand Educational Facs. Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Washington University), Series 2004-A, 0.17% 20342 | 1,880 | 1,880 | ||||||
Health and Educational Facs. Auth. of the State of Missouri, Demand Educational Facs. Rev. Bonds | ||||||||
(Washington University), Series 2004-B, 0.15% 20342 | 4,200 | 4,200 | ||||||
Montana Fac. Fin. Auth., Demand Rev. Bonds (Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health System), | ||||||||
Series 2003, 0.17% 20252 | 4,125 | 4,125 | ||||||
Nebraska Educational Fin. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Creighton University Projects), | ||||||||
Series 2008, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.17% 20352 | 1,905 | 1,905 | ||||||
New Hampshire Health and Education Facs. Auth., Rev. Ref. Bonds (Dartmouth College Issue), | ||||||||
Series 2007-B, 0.14% 20412 | 2,100 | 2,100 | ||||||
Dormitory Auth. of the State of New York, Rev. Bonds (St. John’s University), | ||||||||
Series 2008-A, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.16% 20302 | 3,010 | 3,010 | ||||||
State of Oregon, Full Faith and Credit Tax Anticipation Notes, Series 2012-A, 2.00% 6/28/2013 | 10,000 | 10,169 | ||||||
Public Building Auth. of the County of Montgomery, Pooled Fncg. Rev. Bonds (Tennessee County Loan Pool), | ||||||||
Series 2002, Bank of America LOC, 0.26% 20322 | 1,855 | 1,855 | ||||||
Public Building Auth. of the County of Montgomery, Pooled Fncg. Rev. Bonds (Tennessee County Loan Pool), | ||||||||
Series 2008, Bank of America LOC, 0.26% 20382 | 9,560 | 9,560 | ||||||
State of Texas, Dallas Performing Arts Cultural Facs. Corp., Cultural Fac. Rev. Ref. Bonds | ||||||||
(Dallas Center for the Performing Arts Foundation, Inc. Project), Series 2008-A, Bank of America LOC, 0.19% 20412 | 2,300 | 2,300 | ||||||
City of Houston, Texas, Tax and Rev. Anticipation Notes, Series 2012, 2.00% 6/28/2013 | 10,000 | 10,169 | ||||||
State of Texas, Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 2011-A, 2.50% 8/30/2012 | 9,900 | 9,919 | ||||||
Econ. Dev. Auth. of Albemarle County, Virginia, Hospital Rev. Bonds (Martha Jefferson Hospital), | ||||||||
Series 2008-D, Wells Fargo Bank LOC, 0.15% 20482 | 1,700 | 1,700 | ||||||
Virginia College Building Auth., Educational Facs. Rev. Bonds (21st Century College and Equipment Programs), | ||||||||
Series 2006-B, 0.18% 20262 | 385 | 385 | ||||||
Virginia College Building Auth., Educational Facs. Rev. Bonds (21st Century College and Equipment Programs), | ||||||||
Series 2006-C, 0.18% 20262 | 1,280 | 1,280 | ||||||
West Virginia Hospital Fin. Auth., Hospital Rev. Ref. Bonds (West Virginia United Health System Obligated Group), | ||||||||
Series 2008-B, JPMorgan Chase LOC, 0.17% 20412 | 3,450 | 3,450 | ||||||
Total short-term securities (cost: $155,775,000) | 155,787 | |||||||
Total investment securities (cost: $2,597,395,000) | $ | 2,760,925 | ||||||
Other assets less liabilities | 1,896 | |||||||
Net assets | $ | 2,762,821 |
1Acquired in a transaction exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. May be resold in the U.S. in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. The total value of all such securities was $87,211,000, which represented 3.16% of the net assets of the fund. |
2Coupon rate may change periodically. For short-term securities, the date of the next scheduled coupon rate change is considered to be the maturity date. |
3Step bond; coupon rate will increase at a later date. |
4Scheduled interest and/or principal payment was not received. |
5Valued under fair value procedures adopted by authority of the board of trustees. The total value of all such securities was $6,216,000, which represented .22% of the net assets of the fund. |
Key to abbreviations
Agcy. = Agency
AMT = Alternative Minimum Tax
Auth. = Authority
Certs. of Part. = Certificates of Participation
Dept. = Department
Dev. = Development
Dist. = District
Econ. = Economic
Fac. = Facility
Facs. = Facilities
Fin. = Finance
Fncg. = Financing
G.O. = General Obligation
LOC = Letter of Credit
Preref. = Prerefunded
Redev. = Redevelopment
Ref. = Refunding
Rev. = Revenue
TECP = Tax-Exempt Commercial Paper
Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value.
Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the fund prospectus and summary prospectus, which can be obtained from your financial professional and should be read carefully before investing. You may also call American Funds Service Company (AFS) at 800/421-4225 or visit the American Funds website at americanfunds.com.
MFGEFP-940-0912O-S32884
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
We have audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the financial statements of American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (the “Fund”) as of July 31, 2012, and for the year then ended and have issued our unqualified report thereon dated September 13, 2012 (which report and financial statements are included in item 1 of this Certified Shareholder Report on Form N-CSR). Our audit included an audit of the Fund’s investment portfolio (the “Portfolio”) as of July 31, 2012 appearing in item 6 of this Form N-CSR. The Portfolio is the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Portfolio based on our audit.
In our opinion, the Portfolio referred to above, when read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Fund referred to above, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
September 13, 2012
ITEM 7 – Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable to this Registrant, insofar as the Registrant is not a closed-end management investment company.
ITEM 8 – Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable to this Registrant, insofar as the Registrant is not a closed-end management investment company.
ITEM 9 – Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers
Not applicable to this Registrant, insofar as the Registrant is not a closed-end management investment company.
ITEM 10 – Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant’s board of trustees since the Registrant last submitted a proxy statement to its shareholders. The procedures are as follows. The Registrant has a nominating and governance committee comprised solely of persons who are not considered ‘‘interested persons’’ of the Registrant within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The committee periodically reviews such issues as the board’s composition, responsibilities, committees, compensation and other relevant issues, and recommends any appropriate changes to the full board of trustees. While the committee normally is able to identify from its own resources an ample number of qualified candidates, it will consider shareholder suggestions of persons to be considered as nominees to fill future vacancies on the board. Such suggestions must be sent in writing to the nominating and governance committee of the Registrant, c/o the Registrant’s Secretary, and must be accompanied by complete biographical and occupational data on the prospective nominee, along with a written consent of the prospective nominee for consideration of his or her name by the nominating and governance committee.
ITEM 11 – Controls and Procedures
(a) | The Registrant’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 30a-3 under the Investment Company Act of 1940), that such controls and procedures are adequate and reasonably designed to achieve the purposes described in paragraph (c) of such rule. |
(b) | There were no changes in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) that occurred during the Registrant’s second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
ITEM 12 – Exhibits
(a)(1) | The Code of Ethics that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2 is attached as an exhibit hereto. |
(a)(2) | The certifications required by Rule 30a-2 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are attached as exhibits hereto. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AMERICAN HIGH-INCOME MUNICIPAL BOND FUND | |
By /s/ Karl J. Zeile | |
Karl J. Zeile, President and Principal Executive Officer | |
Date: September 28, 2012 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By /s/ Karl J. Zeile |
Karl J. Zeile, President and Principal Executive Officer |
Date: September 28, 2012 |
By /s/ Dori Laskin |
Dori Laskin, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer |
Date: September 28, 2012 |