U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x |
| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
|
|
|
|
| For the quarterly period ended September 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
| OR |
|
|
|
o |
| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
|
|
|
|
| For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number: 1-14556
THE INVENTURE GROUP, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware |
| 86-0786101 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or |
| (I.R.S. Employer |
Organization) |
| Identification No.) |
|
|
|
5050 N. 40th Street, Suite # 300 Phoenix, Arizona |
| 85018 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
| (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (623) 932-6200
Indicate by check whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Large accelerated filer o |
|
| Accelerated filer o |
|
| Non-accelerated filer x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 19,024,187 as of November 1, 2007.
Table of Contents
2
THE INVENTURE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
|
| September 29, |
| December 30, |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 17,593 |
| $ | 8,671,259 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $106,195 in 2007 and $26,452 in 2006 |
| 9,417,440 |
| 6,284,163 |
| ||
Inventories |
| 13,657,439 |
| 3,459,236 |
| ||
Deferred income tax asset |
| 721,811 |
| 1,103,064 |
| ||
Other current assets |
| 602,450 |
| 521,208 |
| ||
Total current assets |
| 24,416,733 |
| 20,038,930 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property and equipment, net |
| 22,943,819 |
| 12,534,444 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Goodwill |
| 12,726,104 |
| 5,986,252 |
| ||
Trademarks |
| 4,207,032 |
| 4,207,032 |
| ||
Other intangibles, net |
| 361,774 |
| 31,606 |
| ||
Other assets |
| 126,141 |
| 14,000 |
| ||
Total assets |
| $ | 64,781,603 |
| $ | 42,812,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
| $ | 5,733,436 |
| $ | 3,440,033 |
|
Line of credit |
| 7,687,707 |
| — |
| ||
Accrued liabilities |
| 5,064,745 |
| 2,975,723 |
| ||
Current portion of long-term debt |
| 1,176,628 |
| 112,113 |
| ||
Current portion of accrued costs related to brand discontinuance and other exit cost accruals |
| 96,058 |
| 98,400 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
| 19,758,574 |
| 6,626,269 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
| 12,733,804 |
| 3,973,461 |
| ||
Non-current portion of accrued costs related to brand discontinuance and other exit cost accruals |
| — |
| 91,428 |
| ||
Deferred income tax liability |
| 2,200,115 |
| 2,200,114 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
| 34,692,493 |
| 12,891,272 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Shareholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Preferred stock, $100 par value; 50,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding |
| — |
| — |
| ||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized 20,130,552 and 20,150,746 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
| 201,305 |
| 201,508 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
| 29,184,230 |
| 28,854,243 |
| ||
Retained earnings |
| 3,189,379 |
| 2,710,662 |
| ||
|
| 32,574,914 |
| 31,766,413 |
| ||
Less: treasury stock, at cost: 1,106,365 shares in 2007 and 818,740 shares in 2006 |
| (2,485,804 | ) | (1,845,421 | ) | ||
Total shareholders’ equity |
| 30,089,110 |
| 29,920,992 |
| ||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
| $ | 64,781,603 |
| $ | 42,812,264 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
THE INVENTURE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited)
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| September 29, |
| September 30, |
| September 29, |
| September 30, |
| ||||
|
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net revenues |
| $ | 25,372,397 |
| $ | 17,576,141 |
| $ | 65,278,389 |
| $ | 53,669,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cost of revenues |
| 20,876,973 |
| 13,929,567 |
| 53,324,358 |
| 43,224,109 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gross profit |
| 4,495,424 |
| 3,646,574 |
| 11,954,031 |
| 10,444,944 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
| 3,959,539 |
| 3,166,404 |
| 10,462,822 |
| 9,053,623 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating income |
| 535,885 |
| 480,170 |
| 1,491,209 |
| 1,391,321 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest income |
| 23,158 |
| 120,258 |
| 197,307 |
| 320,991 |
| ||||
Interest expense |
| (432,014 | ) | (46,902 | ) | (762,128 | ) | (144,038 | ) | ||||
Interest income (expense), net |
| (408,856 | ) | 73,356 |
| (564,821 | ) | 176,953 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income before income tax provision |
| 127,029 |
| 553,526 |
| 926,388 |
| 1,568,274 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income tax provision |
| (85,600 | ) | (224,100 | ) | (447,673 | ) | (627,700 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
| $ | 41,429 |
| $ | 329,426 |
| $ | 478,715 |
| $ | 940,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
| $ | 0.00 |
| $ | 0.02 |
| $ | 0.02 |
| $ | 0.05 |
|
Diluted |
| $ | 0.00 |
| $ | 0.02 |
| $ | 0.02 |
| $ | 0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted average number of common shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
| 19,285,759 |
| 19,505,400 |
| 19,297,135 |
| 19,489,637 |
| ||||
Diluted |
| 19,290,538 |
| 19,625,173 |
| 19,317,235 |
| 19,595,364 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
THE INVENTURE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
|
| Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
| September 29, |
| September 30, |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
| $ | 478,715 |
| $ | 940,574 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation |
| 1,426,408 |
| 937,616 |
| ||
Amortization |
| 51,933 |
| 4,376 |
| ||
Provision for bad debts |
| 79,268 |
| 28,965 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
| 381,253 |
| 538,940 |
| ||
Share-based compensation expense |
| 237,715 |
| 153,992 |
| ||
Amortization of deferred compensation expense |
| 46,240 |
| 45,862 |
| ||
Loss on disposition of equipment |
| (2,760 | ) | 22,056 |
| ||
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from business acquisition: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable |
| (1,157,327 | ) | 459,168 |
| ||
Inventories |
| (4,244,520 | ) | 63,106 |
| ||
Other assets and liabilities |
| (54,912 | ) | (669,881 | ) | ||
Tax benefit from share-based payments |
| — |
| (8,916 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
| (959,288 | ) | (853,037 | ) | ||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
| (3,717,275 | ) | 1,662,821 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisition of Rader Farms, Inc., net of cash acquired |
| (21,051,101 | ) | — |
| ||
Increase in nonqualified deferred comp |
| (30,535 | ) | — |
| ||
Purchase of equipment |
| (1,920,605 | ) | (302,174 | ) | ||
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
| 13,000 |
| 4,500 |
| ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
| (22,989,241 | ) | (297,674 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Line of credit borrowings/payments, net |
| 7,687,707 |
| — |
| ||
Bank overdraft adjustment |
| 1,239,599 |
| — |
| ||
Debt borrowings |
| 10,089,927 |
| — |
| ||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
| 45,829 |
| 159,733 |
| ||
Increase in treasury stock |
| (640,383 | ) | (1,358,461 | ) | ||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
| — |
| 8,916 |
| ||
Payments made on long-term debt |
| (369,829 | ) | (516,845 | ) | ||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
| 18,052,850 |
| (1,706,657 | ) | ||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
| (8,653,666 | ) | (341,510 | ) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
| 8,671,259 |
| 9,695,245 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
| $ | 17,593 |
| $ | 9,353,735 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
|
| Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
| September 29, |
| September 30, |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
| $ | 597,619 |
| $ | 136,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Price Allocation of Rader Farms, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable |
| $ | 1,917,893 |
|
|
| |
Inventory |
| 6,108,633 |
|
|
| ||
Other current assets |
| 14,714 |
|
|
| ||
Fixed assets |
| 9,943,948 |
|
|
| ||
Other assets |
| 97,049 |
|
|
| ||
Intangibles - covenant-not-to compete |
| 235,327 |
|
|
| ||
Deferred financing charges |
| 119,774 |
|
|
| ||
Goodwill |
| 6,766,852 |
|
|
| ||
Long-term debt |
| (104,760 | ) |
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
| (3,758,930 | ) |
|
| ||
Other current liabilities. |
| (289,399 | ) |
|
| ||
Total estimated cost of acquisition |
| $ | 21,051,101 |
| $ | — |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
THE INVENTURE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
The Inventure Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“the Company”), was formed in 1995 as a holding company to acquire a potato chip manufacturing and distribution business, which had been founded by Donald and James Poore in 1986. The Company changed its name from Poore Brothers, Inc. to The Inventure Group, Inc. on April 10, 2006.
In December 1996, the Company completed an initial public offering of its Common Stock. In November 1998, the Company acquired the business and certain assets (including the Bob’s Texas Style® potato chip brand) of Tejas Snacks, L.P. (“Tejas”), a Texas-based potato chip manufacturer. In October 1999, the Company acquired Wabash Foods, LLC (“Wabash”) including the Tato Skins®, O’Boisies®, and Pizzarias® trademarks and the Bluffton, Indiana manufacturing operation and assumed all of Wabash Foods’ liabilities. In June 2000, the Company acquired Boulder Natural Foods, Inc. (“Boulder”) and the Boulder Canyon Natural FoodsTM brand of totally natural potato chips.
In October 2000, the Company launched its T.G.I. Friday’s® brand salted snacks pursuant to a license agreement with TGI Friday’s Inc., which expires in 2014.
In May 2007, the Company acquired Rader Farms, Inc. including the Rader Farms® trademark and the Lynden, Washington frozen fruit processing operation.
The Company continues to introduce line extensions and test market new and innovative snack food products.
Business
The Company is engaged in the development, production, marketing and distribution of innovative snack food products that are sold primarily through grocery retailers, mass merchandisers, club stores, convenience stores and vend distributors across the United States. The Company currently manufactures and sells nationally T.G.I. Friday’s® brand snacks under license from TGI Friday’s Inc. The Company also distributes Braids® and pretzels. The Company also currently (i) manufactures and sells its own brands of snack food products, including Poore Brothers®, Bob’s Texas Style®, and Boulder Canyon Natural FoodsTM brand batch-fried potato chips and Tato Skins® brand potato snacks, (ii) manufactures private label potato chips for grocery retail chains in the Southwest, and (iii) distributes in Arizona snack food products that are manufactured by others. The Company sells its T.G.I. Friday’s® brand snack products to mass merchandisers, grocery, club and drug stores directly and to convenience stores and vend operators through independent distributors. The Company’s other brands are also sold through independent distributors.
In addition, with the acquisition of Rader Farms, the Company grows, processes and markets premium berry blends, raspberries, blueberries, and rhubarb and purchases marionberries, cherries, cranberries and strawberries from a select network of fruit growers for resale. The fruit is processed, frozen and packaged for sale and distribution nationally to wholesale customers under the Rader Farms® brand, as well as through store brands.
The Company’s business strategy is to continue building a diverse portfolio of specialty food brands with annualized revenues of $5 million to $50 million each through licensing, acquisition or development. This represents a broadening of the Company’s strategy beyond snack foods and may include opportunities other than food brands. The goals of our strategy are to (i) capitalize on specialty food brand opportunities, (ii) deliver incremental category growth for retailers, (iii) provide product innovation targeted to a defined consumer segment, (iv) complement, rather than compete directly against, large national competitors with leading national brands, and (v) build relationships with major retailers in all channels of distribution.
7
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Inventure Group, Inc. and all of its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany amounts and transactions have been eliminated. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary in order to make the condensed consolidated financial statements not misleading. A description of the Company’s accounting policies and other financial information is included in the audited financial statements filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006. The results of operations for the quarter and nine months ending September 29, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Exercises of outstanding stock options are assumed to occur for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share for periods in which their effect would not be anti-dilutive. Earnings per common share was computed as follows for the quarters and nine months ending September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006:
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| September 29, |
| September 30, |
| September 29, |
| September 30, |
| ||||
Basic Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
| $ | 41,429 |
| $ | 329,426 |
| $ | 478,715 |
| $ | 940,574 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares |
| 19,285,759 |
| 19,505,400 |
| 19,297,135 |
| 19,489,637 |
| ||||
Earnings per common share |
| $ | 0.00 |
| $ | 0.02 |
| $ | 0.02 |
| $ | 0.05 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Income |
| $ | 41,429 |
| $ | 329,426 |
| $ | 478,715 |
| $ | 940,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted average number of common shares |
| 19,285,759 |
| 19,505,400 |
| 19,297,135 |
| 19,489,637 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Incremental shares from assumed conversions of stock options and non- vested shares of restricted stock |
| 4,779 |
| 119,773 |
| 20,100 |
| 105,727 |
| ||||
Adjusted weighted average number of common shares |
| 19,290,538 |
| 19,625,173 |
| 19,317,235 |
| 19,595,364 |
| ||||
Earnings per common share |
| $ | 0.00 |
| $ | 0.02 |
| $ | 0.02 |
| $ | 0.05 |
|
Stock Options and Stock-Based Compensation
The Company’s 1995 Stock Option Plan (the “1995 Plan”), as amended, provided for the issuance of options to purchase 3,500,000 shares of Common Stock. The options granted pursuant to the 1995 Plan expire over a five-year period and generally vest over three years. In addition to options granted under the 1995 Plan, the Company also issued non-qualified options (non-plan options) to purchase Common Stock to certain Directors and Officers which are exercisable and expire either five or ten years from date of grant. All options are issued at an exercise price of fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and are non-compensatory. The 1995 Plan expired in May 2005 and was replaced by the Inventure Group, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”) as described below.
8
Stock Options and Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
The 2005 Plan expires in May 2015. Awards granted under the 2005 Plan may include: nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance units and stock-reference awards. If any shares of Common Stock subject to awards granted under the 1995 Plan or the 2005 Plan are canceled, those shares will be available for future awards under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. As of September 29, 2007, there were 164,365 shares of Common Stock available for Awards under the 2005 Plan.
During the nine months ending September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006 the total share-based compensation expense from restricted stock recognized in the financial statements was $46,240 and $45,862, respectively and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses. There were no share-based compensation costs which were capitalized. As of September 29, 2007, the total unrecognized costs related to non-vested restricted stock awards granted was $53,364. The Company expects to recognize such costs in the financial statements over a period of generally three years.
During the nine months ended September 29, 2007, the Company recorded $237,715 of share-based compensation expense (and a reduction of income before taxes) related to stock options.
The Company estimated the fair value of stock options issued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following assumptions:
|
| September 29, |
| September 30, |
|
Expected dividend yield |
| 0 | % | 0 | % |
Expected volatility |
| 50 | % | 50 | % |
Risk-free interest rate |
| 4.76 | % | 5.16 | % |
Expected life – Employees Options |
| 2.4 years |
| 2.4 years |
|
Expected life – Board of Directors Options |
| 1.4 years |
| 1.4 years |
|
The expected dividend yield was based on the Company’s expectation of future dividend payouts. The expected volatility assumption was based on historical volatility during the time period that corresponds to the expected life of the option. The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of stock options granted was estimated based on expected vesting on the date the option was granted. The risk-free interest rate assumption was based on the interest rate of U.S. Treasuries on the date the option was granted.
As of September 29, 2007 the amount of unrecognized compensation expense to be recognized in future periods, in accordance with SFAS 123R, is approximately $457,000. This expected compensation expense does not reflect any new awards, or modifications to existing awards, that could occur in the future.
Stock options become exercisable, based on a three year vesting schedule, in annual increments of thirty-three percent beginning one year after grant date and become fully exercisable after three years from the date of grant. Share-based compensation expense related to stock option awards is recognized on the straight-line method over the requisite service period which is approximately three years.
9
The following table summarizes stock option activity during the nine months ended September 29, 2007:
|
| Plan Options |
| Non-Plan Options |
| ||||||
|
| Options |
| Weighted |
| Options |
| Weighted |
| ||
Balances, December 30, 2006 |
| 722,000 |
| $ | 2.80 |
| 52,500 |
| $ | 3.60 |
|
Granted |
| 812,500 |
| $ | 2.69 |
| — |
| — |
| |
Forfeited |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||
Exercised |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||
Balances, March 31, 2007 |
| 1,534,500 |
| $ | 2.74 |
| 52,500 |
| $ | 3.60 |
|
Granted |
| 189,000 |
| $ | 2.96 |
| — |
| — |
| |
Forfeited |
| (84,400 | ) | $ | 2.96 |
| (7,500 | ) | $ | 3.60 |
|
Exercised |
| (2,600 | ) | $ | 2.99 |
| — |
| — |
| |
Balances, June 30, 2007 |
| 1,636,500 |
| $ | 2.76 |
| 45,000 |
| $ | 3.60 |
|
Granted |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||
Forfeited |
| (41,133 | ) | $ | 3.47 |
| — |
| — |
| |
Exercised |
| (17,867 | ) | $ | 2.13 |
| — |
| — |
| |
Balances, September 29, 2007 |
| 1,577,500 |
| $ | 2.75 |
| 45,000 |
| $ | 3.60 |
|
Tax benefits on stock options exercised are recorded as increases to additional paid-in capital and totaled $0 and $8,916 for September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively.
There were no restricted stock awards granted during the nine months ended September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006. All restricted stock awards vest three years from the date of grant. Share-based compensation expense related to restricted stock awards is recognized on the straight-line method over the requisite service period, which is approximately three years, and the related share-based compensation expense is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Deferred Compensation Plan
Effective January 1, 2007 the Company entered into a deferred compensation plan. The assets are vested in mutual funds and are reflected in other current assets and the related obligation is reflected in accrued liabilities in the balance sheet.
2. Acquisition:
Rader Farms, Inc. On May 17, 2007, The Inventure Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (“The Inventure Group” or the Company) completed the acquisition of Rader Farms, Inc. (“Rader Farms”) for an estimated total cost of approximately $20.7 million which was funded by cash of $4.7 million plus $16 million in debt subject to working capital adjustments, direct expenses and assumed certain liabilities of Rader Farms relating to existing business contracts and leases, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities included on Rader Farms’ balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 and incurred in the ordinary course of business since such date. Rader Farms is a Washington corporation located in Whatcom County. The Company grows processes and markets premium berry blends, raspberries, blueberries, and rhubarb and purchases marionberries, cherries, cranberries and strawberries from a select network of fruit growers for resale. The fruit is processed, frozen and packaged for sale and distribution to wholesale customers. We believe the acquisition provides The Inventure Group access to a growing specialty food category with a best-in-class business that generated approximately $27 million in 2006 net revenues.
10
The acquisition will be accounted for as a purchase pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141”), and accordingly, the operating results of Rader Farms will be included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The purchase price was determined through an arms-length negotiation between the parties, and has been initially allocated to the underlying assets based on an estimate of fair values and remaining economic lives. In connection with the Rader Farms acquisition, our preliminary purchase price allocation included $6.4 million of goodwill, $0.3 million of intangible assets which include $0.2 million in a covenant-not-to-compete from the former owners and $0.1 million of deferred financing costs associated with the debt incurred to acquire Rader Farms. Adjustments have been made to the original purchase price allocation to adjust inventory and accounts receivables acquired at the purchase date. The net impact of these adjustments was to increase goodwill $0.4 million at September 29, 2007. The Company has not completely finalized its valuation of intangible assets for the initial purchase price allocation. The Company is working with an independent third party to appraise the intangible assets as of the transaction date and to assist management in its valuation. In addition, the Company is still in the process of obtaining all information necessary to completely finalize the allocation of the purchase price to the individual assets and liabilities. This could result in adjustments to the carrying value of the assets and liabilities acquired, the useful lives of intangible assets and the residual amount allocated to goodwill. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price is based on the best estimates of management and is subject to revision based on the final valuations and estimates of useful lives. The estimated amortization period for the intangibles acquired and valued to date in this transaction consist of the covenant-not-to-compete amortization over 5 years and the estimated weighted average amortization period for the deferred financing costs over 8.5 years.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2007 and 2006 gives effect to the (i) Rader Farms acquisition, and (ii) financing transactions described above which occurred on May 17, 2007, as if each had occurred at the beginning of the periods presented. The pro forma results were determined using estimates and assumptions, which management believes to be reasonable, based upon limited available information. This pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the results of future operations.
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| Sept. 29, |
| Sept. 30, |
| Sept. 29, |
| Sept. 30, |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net revenues |
| $ | 25,372,397 |
| $ | 24,436,045 |
| $ | 78,217,920 |
| $ | 74,248,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
| $ | 41,429 |
| $ | 558,861 |
| $ | 983,679 |
| $ | 1,628,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
| $ | 0.00 |
| $ | 0.03 |
| $ | 0.05 |
| $ | 0.08 |
|
Diluted |
| $ | 0.00 |
| $ | 0.03 |
| $ | 0.05 |
| $ | 0.08 |
|
3. Inventories:
Inventories consisted of the following as of September 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006:
|
| September 29, |
| December 30, |
| ||
Finished goods |
| $ | 3,487,321 |
| $ | 1,833,495 |
|
Raw materials and deferred crop costs |
| 10,170,118 |
| 1,625,741 |
| ||
|
| $ | 13,657,439 |
| $ | 3,459,236 |
|
11
4. Goodwill, Trademarks and Other Intangibles, Net:
Goodwill, trademarks and other intangibles, net consisted of the following as of September 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006:
|
| Estimated |
| September 29, |
| December 30, |
| ||
Goodwill: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
The Inventure Group, Inc. |
|
|
| $ | 5,986,252 |
| $ | 5,986,252 |
|
Rader Farms, Inc. |
|
|
| 6,739,852 |
| — |
| ||
|
|
|
| $ | 12,726,104 |
| $ | 5,986,252 |
|
Trademarks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
The Inventure Group, Inc. |
|
|
| $ | 4,207,032 |
| $ | 4,207,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Covenant-not-to-compete, net - Lyle/Sue Rader |
| 5 years |
| 219,639 |
| — |
| ||
Consolidated deferred financing costs, net |
| 8 ½ -15 years |
| 142,135 |
| 31,606 |
| ||
|
|
|
| $ | 361,774 |
| $ | 31,606 |
|
In the third quarter 2007, we recorded an increase of $0.4 million in Rader Farms goodwill as a result of certain adjustments made to the estimated fair values of the assets and liabilities assumed in the acquisition. These adjustments to the initial purchase accounting related primarily to: receivable balances which were deemed uncollectible after the purchase date and an adjustment to the market value on two inventory items at the purchase date. The final purchase price allocation has not been completed and adjustments may still be made to the carrying value of the assets and liabilities acquired, the useful lives of intangible assets and the residual amount allocated to goodwill.
Amortization expense for the third quarter 2007 and 2006 was $43,875 and $1,458, respectively. As of September 29, 2007, we expect amortization expense over the next five years to be as follows:
2007 |
| $ | 86,044 |
|
2008 |
| $ | 147,500 |
|
2009 |
| $ | 147,500 |
|
2010 |
| $ | 147,500 |
|
2011 |
| $ | 147,500 |
|
2012 |
| $ | 144,112 |
|
Goodwill and trademarks are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently, if impairment indicators arise. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment between the annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that more-likely-than-not reduces the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are required to be tested for impairment between the annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change indicating that the asset might be impaired. The Company believes, at this time, that the carrying values continue to be appropriate.
12
5. Accrued Liabilities:
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of September 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006:
|
| September 29, |
| December 30, |
| ||
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes |
| $ | 1,140,478 |
| $ | 1,300,653 |
|
Accrued royalties and commissions |
| 475,956 |
| 509,157 |
| ||
Accrued advertising and promotion |
| 1,357,447 |
| 838,934 |
| ||
Accrued growers |
| 1,003,817 |
| — |
| ||
Accrued other |
| 1,087,047 |
| 326,979 |
| ||
|
| $ | 5,064,745 |
| $ | 2,975,723 |
|
6. Long-Term Debt:
Long-term debt consisted of the following as of September 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006:
|
| September 29, |
| December 30, |
| ||
|
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||
Mortgage loan due in monthly installments through July, 2012; interest at 9.03%; collateralized by land and building in Goodyear, AZ |
| $ | 1,647,162 |
| $ | 1,685,574 |
|
Mortgage loan due in monthly installments through December, 2016; interest at fixed rate of 6.85%; collateralized by land and building in Bluffton, IN |
| 2,358,638 |
| 2,400,000 |
| ||
Equipment term loan due in monthly installments through May, 2104; interest at LIBOR plus 165 basis points; collateralized by equipment at Rader Farms in Lynden, WA |
| 5,785,714 |
| — |
| ||
Real Estate term loan due in monthly installments through July, 2017; interest at LIBOR plus 165 basis points; secured by a leasehold interest in the real property we are leasing from the former owners of Rader Farms in Lynden, WA |
| 3,962,506 |
| — |
| ||
Vehicle term loan and capital leases due in various monthly installments, the last of which is due in February, 2011; collateralized by vehicles at Rader Farms in Lynden, WA |
| 156,412 |
| — |
| ||
|
| 13,910,432 |
| 4,085,574 |
| ||
Less current portion of long-term debt |
| (1,176,628 | ) | (112,113 | ) | ||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
| $ | 12,733,804 |
| $ | 3,973,461 |
|
Interest Rate Swap
The Company entered into an interest rate swap in 2006 to convert the interest rate of the mortgage to purchase the Bluffton, Indiana plant to a fixed rate of 6.85%. The swap is not accounted for as a cash flow hedge. The swap has a fixed pay-rate of 6.85% and a notional amount of approximately $2.4 million at September 29, 2007 and expires in December, 2016. The value of the swap was not material at September 29, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
13
Long-Term Debt
The Company’s Goodyear, Arizona manufacturing and distribution facility is subject to a $1.6 million mortgage loan from Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York bears interest at 9.03% per annum and is secured by the building and the land on which it is located. The loan matures on July 1, 2012; however monthly principal and interest installments of $16,825 are determined based on a twenty-year amortization period.
The Company’s Bluffton, Indiana manufacturing and distribution facility is subject to a $2.4 million mortgage loan from U.S. Bank National Association, bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.85% and is secured by the building and the land on which it is located. The loan matures in December, 2016; however monthly principal and interest installments of $18,392 are determined based on a twenty-year amortization period.
To fund the acquisition of Rader Farms, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”). Each of our subsidiaries is a guarantor of the Loan Agreement, which is secured by a pledge of all of the assets of our consolidated group. The borrowing capacity available to us under the Loan Agreement consists of notes representing: (i) a $15,000,000 revolving line of credit maturing on June 30, 2011; (ii) an equipment term loan, secured by the equipment acquired, subject to a $5.8 million mortgage loan from U.S. Bank National Association, bears interest at the 30 day LIBOR plus 165 basis points. The loan matures in May, 2014.
Monthly principal installments are $71,429 plus interest and (iii) a real estate term loan, secured by a leasehold interest in the real property we are leasing from the former owners of Rader Farms in connection with the Acquisition, subject to a $4.0 million real estate term loan from U.S. Bank National Association, bears interest at the 30 day LIBOR plus 165 basis points. The loan matures in July, 2017; however monthly principal and interest installments of $36,357 are determined based on a fifteen-year amortization period.
All borrowings under the revolving line of credit will bear interest at either (i) the prime rate of interest announced by U.S. Bank from time to time or (ii) LIBOR, plus the LIBOR Rate Margin (as defined in the revolving credit facility note). The term loan will bear interest at LIBOR, plus the LIBOR Rate Margin (as defined in the term loan note).
As is customary in such financings, U.S. Bank may terminate its commitments and accelerate the repayment of amounts outstanding and exercise other remedies upon the occurrence of an event of default (as defined in the Loan Agreement), subject, in certain instances, to the expiration of an applicable cure period. The agreement requires the Company to maintain compliance with certain financial covenants, including a minimum tangible net worth, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a minimum current ratio. At September 29, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants.
14
7. Brand Discontinuance:
On June 11, 2004, the Company discontinued its Crunch Toons® brand. In connection with the brand discontinuation the Company negotiated amendments to its license agreements with Warner Bros. Consumer Products pursuant to which the Agreements will remain in effect, but will become non-exclusive. Because the Company has ceased using the Crunch Toons® brand, the Company accrued the fair value of remaining royalties in accordance with SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” The Company estimated the fair value of the remaining guaranteed future minimum payments under the agreements by computing the present value of the future cash payments.
The following table summarizes the activity of the accrued costs related to brand discontinuance and other exit costs for the three months ended September 29, 2007:
|
| June 30, 2007 |
| Accreted |
| Sept. 29, 2007 |
| |||
Present value of guaranteed minimum royalty payments |
| $ | 94,886 |
| $ | 1,172 | (2) | $ | 96,058 | (1) |
(1) These amounts are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Current portion of accrued costs related to brand discontinuance and other exit cost accruals.”
(2) In accordance with SFAS No. 146, interest accretion was recorded for the period and future royalty payments will be made in accordance with the amended agreements. Final payment is due March 30, 2008.
8. Litigation:
The Company is periodically a party to various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes, based on discussions with legal counsel, that the resolution of such lawsuits, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
The Inventure Group, Inc. is one of eight companies sued by the Environmental Law Foundation in August, 2006 in the Superior Court for the State of California for the County of Los Angeles by the Attorney General of the State of California for alleged violations of California Proposition 65. California Proposition 65 is a state law that, in part, requires companies to warn California residents if a product contains chemicals listed within the statute. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and penalties but has made no specific demands. We continue to vigorously defend this suit.
9. Business Segments:
The Company’s operations consist of three segments: manufactured snack products, distributed snack products, and processed berry products. The manufactured snack products segment produces potato chips, potato crisps and potato skins, for sale primarily to snack food distributors and retailers. The distributed snack products segment sells snack food products manufactured by other companies to the Company’s Arizona snack food distributors. The processed berry products segment was acquired by the Company in May 2007 through the Rader Farms acquisition. This segment grows, processes and markets premium berry blends, raspberries, blueberries, and rhubarb and purchases marionberries, cherries, cranberries and strawberries from a select network of fruit growers for resale. The fruit is processed, frozen and packaged for sale and distribution nationally to wholesale customers. The Company’s reportable segments offer different products and services. All of the Company’s revenues are attributable to primarily to external customers in the United States and all of its assets are located in the United States.
15
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Note 1 to the audited financial statements filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006 and in subsequent Form 10-Q filings with respect to the acquisition of Rader Farms, Inc. The Company does not allocate assets, selling, general and administrative expenses, income taxes or other income and expense to its segments that impact the reporting of gross profit in the following tables:
|
| Manufactured |
| Distributed |
| Processed |
|
|
| ||||
Quarter ended September 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net revenues from external customers |
| $ | 16,535,722 |
| $ | 668,644 |
| $ | 8,168,031 |
| $ | 25,372,397 |
|
Depreciation and amortization in segment gross profit |
| 225,303 |
| — |
| 228,406 |
| 453,709 |
| ||||
Segment gross profit |
| 2,481,658 |
| 105,200 |
| 1,908,566 |
| 4,495,424 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Quarter ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net revenues from external customers |
| $ | 17,018,387 |
| $ | 557,754 |
| — |
| $ | 17,576,141 |
| |
Depreciation and amortization in segment gross profit |
| 216,923 |
| — |
| — |
| 216,923 |
| ||||
Segment gross profit |
| 3,598,491 |
| 48,083 |
| — |
| 3,646,574 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Nine months ended September 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net revenues from external customers |
| $ | 50,716,443 |
| $ | 2,080,737 |
| $ | 12,481,209 |
| $ | 65,278,389 |
|
Depreciation and amortization in segment gross profit |
| 667,445 |
| — |
| 304,675 |
| 972,120 |
| ||||
Segment gross profit |
| 8,961,716 |
| 305,102 |
| 2,687,213 |
| 11,954,031 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net revenues from external customers |
| $ | 51,403,843 |
| $ | 2,265,210 |
| — |
| $ | 53,669,053 |
| |
Depreciation and amortization in segment gross profit |
| 648,144 |
| — |
| — |
| 648,144 |
| ||||
Segment gross profit |
| 10,185,850 |
| 259,094 |
| — |
| 10,444,944 |
|
The following table reconciles reportable segment gross profit to the Company’s consolidated income before income tax provision.
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| September 29, |
| September 30, |
| September 29, |
| September 29, |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Segment gross profit |
| $ | 4,495,424 |
| $ | 3,646,574 |
| $ | 11,954,031 |
| $ | 10,444,944 |
|
Unallocated amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
| (3,959,539 | ) | (3,166,404 | ) | (10,462,822 | ) | (9,053,623 | ) | ||||
Interest income (expense), net |
| (408,856 | ) | 73,356 |
| (564,821 | ) | 176,953 |
| ||||
Income before income tax provision |
| $ | 127,029 |
| $ | 553,526 |
| $ | 926,388 |
| $ | 1,568,274 |
|
16
10. Shareholders’ Equity:
In August, 2007 the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock re-purchase program whereby up to $3 million of common stock may be purchased from time to time at the discretion of management (the “2007 program”). Since inception of the 2007 program, the Company has repurchased $640,382, leaving $2,395,618 of remaining authorization. The repurchased shares are held as treasury stock and are available for general corporate purposes. Common stock held in the Company’s treasury has been recorded at cost. We continue to evaluate our share repurchase opportunities. The 2007 program expires on August 23, 2008.
A summary of common stock repurchases under the current active 2007 program is set forth in the following table. All shares of common stock were repurchased pursuant to open market transactions.
Period |
| Total Number |
| Weighted |
| Total Number of |
| Maximum that |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
8/2007 Approved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 3,000,000 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
8/31/07 - 9/27/07 |
| 287,625 |
| $ | 2.23 |
| 287,625 |
| 640,382 |
| |
2007 Program Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 2,395,618 |
| |
In May, 2006 the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock re-purchase program whereby up to $3 million of common stock could be purchased from time to time at the discretion of management (the “2006 program). The Company repurchased 600,740 shares at a total cost of $1,358,461, leaving $1,651,539 remaining at September 30, 2006. The repurchased shares are held as treasury stock and are available for general corporate purposes. Common stock held in the Company’s treasury has been recorded at cost. The 2006 program expired on February 14, 2007.
A summary of common stock repurchases under the 2006 program is set forth in the following table. All shares of common stock were repurchased pursuant to open market transactions.
Period |
| Total Number |
| Weighted |
| Total Number of |
| Maximum |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
5/2006 Approved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 3,000,000 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
8/1/06 - 8/22/06 |
| 600,740 |
| $ | 2.26 |
| 600,740 |
| 1,358,461 |
| |
2006 Program remaining at 9/30/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 1,641,539 |
| |
17
11. Income Taxes:
The Company experienced significant net losses in prior fiscal years resulting in a net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward for federal income tax purposes of approximately $2.2 million at December 30, 2006. The Company’s NOL will begin to expire in varying amounts between 2010 and 2018.
Generally accepted accounting principles require that a valuation allowance be established when it is more-likely-than-not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowances from period to period are included in the tax provision in the period of change. In determining whether a valuation allowance is required, the Company takes into account all positive and negative evidence with regard to the utilization of a deferred tax asset including our past earnings history, expected future earnings, the character and jurisdiction of such earnings, unsettled circumstances that, if unfavorably resolved, would adversely affect utilization of a deferred tax asset, carryback and carryforward periods and tax strategies that could potentially enhance the likelihood of realization of a deferred tax asset. The Company provides for income taxes at a rate equal to the combined federal and state effective rates, which approximated 44% under current tax rates.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that the Company recognize in its financial statements the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective as of the beginning of our 2007 fiscal year, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The adoption of FIN 48 on December 31, 2006 (the first day of fiscal year 2007) did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
18
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including all documents incorporated by reference, includes “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and the Company desires to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions thereof. Therefore, the Company is including this statement for the express purpose of availing itself of the protections of the safe harbor with respect to all of such forward-looking statements. In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “will likely result,” “will continue,” “future” and similar terms and expressions identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including specifically the possibility that the Company will need additional financing due to future operating losses or in order to implement the Company’s business strategy, the possible diversion of management resources from the day-to-day operations of the Company as a result of strategic acquisitions, potential difficulties resulting from the integration of acquired businesses with the Company’s business, other acquisition-related risks, lack of consumer acceptance of existing and future products, dependence upon key license agreements, dependence upon major customers, significant competition, risks related to the food products industry, volatility of the market price of the Company’s common stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), the possible de-listing of the Common Stock from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market if the Company fails to satisfy the applicable listing criteria (including a minimum share price) in the future and those other risks and uncertainties discussed herein and in the Company’s other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will in fact transpire or prove to be accurate. Readers are cautioned to consider the specific risk factors described herein and in “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006, and not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained herein, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date hereof. All subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this section.
Significant Trends and Developments in Our Business
Acquisition of Rader Farms, Inc. On May 17, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Rader Farms, Inc. (“Rader Farms”) for an estimated total cost of approximately $20.7 million which was funded by cash of $4.7 million plus $16 million in debt subject to working capital adjustments, direct expenses and assumed certain liabilities of Rader Farms relating to existing business contracts and leases, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities included on Rader Farms’ balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 and incurred in the ordinary course of business since such date. Rader Farms is a Washington corporation located in Whatcom County. The Company grows, processes and markets premium berry blends, raspberries, blueberries, and rhubarb and purchases marionberries, cherries, cranberries and strawberries from a select network of fruit growers for resale. The fruit is processed, frozen and packaged for sale and distribution to wholesale customers. We believe the acquisition provides The Inventure Group access to a growing specialty food category with a best-in-class business that generated approximately $27 million in 2006 net revenues.
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141”), see Note 2 “Acquisition: Rader Farms, Inc.”.
19
Results of Operations
The Rader Farms acquisition significantly impacts the comparability of third quarter 2007 results to third quarter 2006 and nine months ended 2007 results to the nine months ended 2006. The following tables summarize the changes in the various components of gross profit with and without Rader Farms. More detailed explanations of the changes occur in the discussion and analysis following these tables:
Quarter end comparisons through gross profit:
|
| Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| Sept. 29, |
| Sept, 30, |
| $ Change |
| % Change |
| |||
Consolidated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net revenues |
| $ | 25,372,397 |
| $ | 17,576,141 |
| $ | 7,796,256 |
| 44.4 | % |
Cost of revenues |
| 20,876,973 |
| 13,929,567 |
| 6,947,406 |
| 49.9 | % | |||
Gross profit |
| $ | 4,495,424 |
| $ | 3,646,574 |
| $ | 848,850 |
| 23.3 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
The Inventure Group Only: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net revenues |
| $ | 17,204,366 |
| $ | 17,576,141 |
| $ | (371,775 | ) | (2.1 | )% |
Cost of revenues |
| 14,617,508 |
| 13,929,567 |
| 687,941 |
| 4.9 | % | |||
Gross profit |
| $ | 2,586,858 |
| $ | 3,646,574 |
| $ | (1,059,716 | ) | (29.1 | )% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Rader Farms Only: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net revenues |
| $ | 8,168,031 |
| $ | —- |
| $ | 8,168,031 |
| — | % |
Cost of revenues |
| 6,259,465 |
| — |
| 6,259,465 |
| — | % | |||
Gross profit |
| $ | 1,908,566 |
| $ | —- |
| $ | 1,908,566 |
| — | % |
Nine months ended comparisons through gross profit:
|
| Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| Sept. 29, |
| Sept, 30, |
| $ Change |
| % Change |
| |||
Consolidated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net revenues |
| $ | 65,278,389 |
| $ | 53,669,053 |
| $ | 11,609,336 |
| 21.6 | % |
Cost of revenues |
| 53,324,358 |
| 43,224,109 |
| 10,100,249 |
| 23.4 | % | |||
Gross profit |
| $ | 11,954,031 |
| $ | 10,444,944 |
| $ | 1,509,087 |
| 14.4 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
The Inventure Group Only: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net revenues |
| $ | 52,797,180 |
| $ | 53,669,053 |
| $ | (871,873 | ) | (1.6 | )% |
Cost of revenues |
| 43,881,146 |
| 43,224,109 |
| 657,037 |
| 1.5 | % | |||
Gross profit |
| $ | 8,916,034 |
| $ | 10,444,944 |
| $ | (1,528,910 | ) | (14.6 | )% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Rader Farms Only: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net revenues |
| $ | 12,481,209 |
| $ | —- |
| $ | 12,481,209 |
| — | % |
Cost of revenues |
| 9,443,212 |
| — |
| 9,443,212 |
| — | % | |||
Gross profit |
| $ | 3,037,997 |
| $ | —- |
| $ | 3,037,997 |
| — | % |
20
Quarter ended September 29, 2007 compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2006
Net revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 were $25.4 million, 44.4% over last year’s third quarter net revenues of $17.6 million. Total net revenues in the third quarter of 2007 include $8.2 million from Rader Farms. Excluding the impact of the Rader Farms acquisition, net revenues decreased 2.1% compared to third quarter 2006. Total potato chip net revenues were up 26.1% for the quarter, offset by declines in T.G.I. Friday’s® brand net revenues primarily attributable to the change in the trade promotion program year over year.
Gross profit for the quarter ended September 29, 2007 was $4.5 million, representing an increase of $0.9 million compared to July 1, 2006 gross profit of $3.6 million. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues decreased to 17.7% from 20.7% comparing 2007 to 2006. The decrease in percentage is due primarily to the impact of rising industry-wide commodity prices on the manufacturing of our snack products, offset by the Company’s continued focus on lowering trade and promotional allowances, which are deducted from gross revenue, and decreased freight expense as a result of operational efficiencies the Company is enacting.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $0.7 million to $3.9 million in the third quarter of 2007, versus the same period last year, but decreased as a percentage of net revenue going from 18.0% in the third quarter of 2006 to 15.5% of net revenue this year. Increased investments in growth oriented snack food business marketing programs (e.g. sampling programs, racks for convenience stores, market research, tradeshows and demonstrations, etc.) of approximately $0.5 million together with increased organizational investments in Information Technology (“IT”) support services of $0.1 million were the primary factors affecting the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses versus the quarter ended September 30, 2006.
Net interest expense was $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared to net interest income of $.07 million in the third quarter of 2006 due primarily to increased interest expense resulting from the mortgage on the purchase of the Bluffton, Indiana property in December, 2006 and the increased debt and cash used to acquire Rader Farms in May, 2007.
Net income was $0.04 million, or $0.00 per basic and diluted share, compared to net income of $0.3 million, or $0.02 per basic and diluted share last year. Gross profit increased $0.8 million offset by increased investments in growth oriented snack food business marketing programs (e.g. sampling programs, racks for convenience stores, market research, tradeshows and demonstrations, etc.) of approximately $0.5 million, increased organizational investments particularly focused on IT improvements and the impact of the change in net interest expense mentioned above were the primary factors affecting the net income decline versus the quarter ended September 30, 2006.
Nine months ended September 29, 2007 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006
For the nine months ended September 29, 2007 net revenues increased 21.6% to $65.3 million, compared with net revenue of $53.7 million for the nine months of the previous year. Total net revenues for the nine months ended September 29, 2007 include $12.5 million from Rader Farms. Excluding the impact of the Rader Farms acquisition, net revenues decreased slightly by 1.6% compared to the nine months ended 2006. Poore Brothers® and Boulder Canyon Natural FoodsTM net revenues grew by 22.1% and 24.4%, respectively, with potato chip net revenues increasing 18.3% overall. T.G.I. Friday’s® brand products decreased slightly by 6.4%. The nine months ended 2006 included $0.5 million of Cinnabon® product net revenues. Excluding the impact of the Cinnabon® product sales and Rader Farms, total net revenues were relatively flat comparing the first nine months of 2007 with 2006. We plan to continue to test market several new products during the remainder of the year.
Gross profit for the nine months ended September 29, 2007 was $12.0 million, or 18.3% of net revenues, compared to $10.4 million, or 19.5% of net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Consistent with the decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net revenues described above, the decrease in percentage is due primarily to the impact of rising industry-wide commodity prices on the manufacturing of our snack products, offset by the Company’s continued focus on lowering trade and promotional allowances, which are deducted from gross revenue, and decreased freight expense as a result of operational efficiencies the Company is enacting.
21
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $10.5 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2007 from $9.1 million for the nine months ended July 1, 2006, but decreased as a percentage of net revenues from 16.9% of net revenues for the first nine months of 2006 to 16.0% of net revenues for the first nine months of 2007.
Net interest expense was $0.5 million in the first nine months of 2007 compared to net interest income of $0.2 million in the first nine months of 2006 due primarily to increased interest expense resulting from the mortgage on the purchase of the Bluffton, Indiana property in December, 2006 and the increased debt and cash used to acquire Rader Farms in May, 2007.
Net income for the nine months ended September 29, 2007 was $0.5 million, or $0.02 per basic and diluted share, compared with net income of $0.9 million, or $0.05 per basic and diluted share, in the prior-year period. Gross profit increased $1.6 million offset by increased investments in growth oriented snack food business marketing programs (e.g. sampling programs, racks for convenience stores, market research, tradeshows and demonstrations, etc.) of approximately $1.1 million, increased organizational investments particularly focused on IT improvements and the impact of the change in net interest expense mentioned above were the primary factors affecting the net income decline versus the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net working capital was $4.7 million (a current ratio of 1.2:1) at September 29, 2007 and $13.4 million (a current ratio of 3.0:1) at December 30, 2006. For the nine months ended September 29, 2007, the Company used cash flow from operating activities of $3.7 million, invested $1.9 million in equipment, invested $21.1 million to acquire Rader Farms, incurred $10.1 million in long-term debt acquiring Rader Farms, increased line of credit borrowings by $7.7 million, increased bank overdraft borrowings by $1.2 million, made $0.4 million in payments on long-term debt and repurchased $0.6 million of common stock held in treasury. The large decrease in working capital and cash resulted primarily from the actions taken to acquire Rader Farms (see Note 2 Acquisition: Rader Farms, Inc.) and the Company’s change of its treasury management practice to use all available cash, after meeting day-to-day operating expenses, to pay down the line of credit through a sweep account, thereby mitigating interest expense, since the interest rate on the line of credit exceeds interest income that could be earned in the current investment community. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company provided cash flow from operating activities of $1.7 million, invested $0.3 million in equipment, made $0.5 million in payments on long-term debt, repurchased $1.4 million of common stock held in treasury and realized cash flow from common stock option exercises of $0.2 million.
The Company’s Goodyear, Arizona manufacturing and distribution facility is subject to a $1.6 million mortgage loan from Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, bears interest at 9.03% per annum and is secured by the building and the land on which it is located. The loan matures on July 1, 2012; however monthly principal and interest installments of $16,825 are determined based on a twenty-year amortization period.
The Company’s Bluffton, Indiana manufacturing and distribution facility was purchased for $3.0 million in December, 2006. The facility is subject to a $2.4 million mortgage loan from U.S. Bank National Association, bears interest at the 30 day LIBOR plus 165 basis points and is secured by the building and the land on which it is located. The loan matures in December, 2016; however monthly principal and interest installments of $18,392 are determined based on a twenty-year amortization period.
To fund the acquisition of Rader Farms the Company entered into a Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”). Each of our subsidiaries is a guarantor of the Loan Agreement, which is secured by a pledge of all of the assets of our consolidated group. The borrowing capacity available to us under the Loan Agreement consists of notes representing: (i) a $15,000,000 revolving line of credit maturing on June 30, 2011; (ii) an equipment term loan, secured by the equipment acquired, subject to a $5.8 million mortgage loan from U.S. Bank National Association, bears interest at the 30 day LIBOR plus 165 basis points. The loan matures in May, 2014. Monthly principal installments are $71,429 plus interest and (iii) a real estate term loan, secured by a leasehold interest in the real property we are leasing from the former owners of Rader Farms in connection with the Acquisition, subject to a $4.0 million real estate term loan from U.S. Bank National Association, bears interest at the 30 day LIBOR plus 165 basis points. The loan matures in July, 2017; however monthly principal and interest installments of $36,357 are determined based on a fifteen-year amortization period.
22
All borrowings under the revolving line of credit will bear interest at either (i) the prime rate of interest announced by U.S. Bank from time to time or (ii) LIBOR, plus the LIBOR Rate Margin (as defined in the revolving credit facility note). The term loan will bear interest at LIBOR, plus the LIBOR Rate Margin (as defined in the term loan note).
As is customary in such financings, U.S. Bank may terminate its commitments and accelerate the repayment of amounts outstanding and exercise other remedies upon the occurrence of an event of default (as defined in the Loan Agreement), subject, in certain instances, to the expiration of an applicable cure period. The agreement requires the Company to maintain compliance with certain financial covenants, including a minimum tangible net worth, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a debt to equity ratio. At September 29, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants.
In August, 2007 the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock re-purchase program whereby up to $3 million of common stock may be purchased from time to time at the discretion of management (the “2007 program”). Since inception of the 2007 program, the Company has repurchased $640,382, leaving $2,395,618 of remaining authorization. The repurchased shares are held as treasury stock and are available for general corporate purposes. Common stock held in the Company’s treasury has been recorded at cost. We continue to evaluate our share repurchase opportunities. The 2007 program expires on August 23, 2008.
A summary of our common stock repurchases under the current active 2007 program is set forth in the following table. All shares of common stock were repurchased pursuant to open market transactions.
Period |
| Total Number |
| Weighted |
| Total Number of |
| Maximum that |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
8/2007 Approved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 3,000,000 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
8/31/07 - 9/27/07 |
| 287,625 |
| $ | 2.23 |
| 287,625 |
| 640,382 |
| |
2007 Program Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 2,395,618 |
| |
In May, 2006 the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock re-purchase program whereby up to $3 million of common stock could be purchased from time to time at the discretion of management (the “2006 program). The Company repurchased 600,740 shares at a total cost of $1,358,461, leaving $1,651,539 remaining at September 30, 2006. The repurchased shares are held as treasury stock and are available for general corporate purposes. Common stock held in the Company’s treasury has been recorded at cost. The 2006 program expired on February 14, 2007.
A summary of common stock repurchases under the 2006 program is set forth in the following table. All shares of common stock were repurchased pursuant to open market transactions.
Period |
| Total Number |
| Weighted |
| Total Number of |
| Maximum |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
5/2006 Approved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 3,000,000 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
8/1/06 - 8/22/06 |
| 600,740 |
| $ | 2.26 |
| 600,740 |
| 1,358,461 |
| |
2006 Program remaining at 9/30/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 1,641,539 |
| |
23
Interest Rate Swap
The Company entered into an interest rate swap in 2006 to convert the interest rate of the mortgage to purchase the Bluffton, Indiana plant to a fixed rate of 6.85%. The swap is not accounted for as a cash flow hedge. The swap has a fixed pay-rate of 6.85% and a notional amount of $2.4 million at December 30, 2006 and expires in December, 2016. The value of the swap was not material at September 29, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
Contractual Obligations
The Company’s future contractual obligations consist principally of long-term debt, operating leases, minimum commitments regarding third party warehouse operations services and remaining minimum royalty payments due licensors pursuant to brand licensing agreements. Under the amendments to the license agreements with Warner Bros. Consumer Products, the remaining minimum royalty payments will continue to be due throughout the remaining term of the agreements. The Company currently has no material marketing or capital expenditure commitments. As of September 29, 2007 there have been no material changes to the Company’s contractual obligations since its December 30, 2006 fiscal year end, other than those incurred as part of the acquisition of Rader Farms (see Note 2 Acquisition: Rader Farms, Inc.).
Management’s Plans
In connection with the implementation of the Company’s business strategy, the Company may incur operating losses in the future and may require future debt or equity financings (particularly in connection with future strategic acquisitions, new brand introductions or capital expenditures). Expenditures relating to acquisition-related integration costs, market and territory expansion and new product development and introduction may adversely affect promotional and operating expenses and consequently may adversely affect operating and net income. These types of expenditures are expensed for accounting purposes as incurred, while revenue generated from the result of such expansion or new products may benefit future periods. Management believes that the Company will generate positive cash flow from operations during the next twelve months, which, along with its existing working capital and borrowing facilities, will enable the Company to meet its operating cash requirements for the next twelve months. This belief is based on current operating plans and certain assumptions, including those relating to the Company’s future revenue levels and expenditures, industry and general economic conditions and other conditions. If any of these factors change, the Company may require future debt or equity financings to meet its business requirements. There can be no assurance that any required financings will be available or, if available, on terms attractive to the Company.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Securities and Exchange Commission indicated that a “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company believes that the following accounting policies fit this definition:
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Inventories. The Company’s inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. The Company identifies slow moving or obsolete inventories and estimates appropriate loss provisions related thereto. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required. Deferred crop costs are costs generally incurred from July 1 to December 31 relating to the following year’s harvest season. These costs generally include labor and related employee benefits, maintenance of fields and plants, and fixed and variable overhead.
24
Goodwill, Trademarks and Other Intangibles. Goodwill and trademarks are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently, if impairment indicators arise. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment between the annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are required to be tested for impairment between the annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change indicating that the asset might be impaired. The Company believes, at this time, that the carrying values continue to be appropriate. Further discussion of goodwill and trademarks is set forth below:
• The Company’s Bob’s Texas Style® potato chip brand was acquired in 1998 when the business of Tejas Snacks, L.P. was acquired. The Bob’s Texas Style® trademark has a carrying value of approximately $1.2 million.
• The Company’s Tato Skins® potato chip brand was acquired in 1999 when the business of Wabash Foods was acquired. The Wabash - Tato Skins® trademark has a carrying value of approximately $2.1 million.
• The Company’s Boulder CanyonTM potato chip brand was acquired in 2000 when the business of Boulder Natural Foods, Inc. was acquired. The Boulder CanyonTM trademark has a carrying value of $0.9 million.
• The Company’s Rader Farms® brand was acquired in 2007 when the business of Rader Farms, Inc. was acquired. The Company is currently in the process of obtaining an independent valuation of the trademark that was acquired.
• The covenant-not-to-compete was entered into in 2007 when the business of Rader Farms, Inc. was acquired. The agreement is with Lyle and Sue Rader, the former owners of Rader Farms, Inc. The agreement has a carrying value, net of accumulated amortization, of approximately $0.2 million.
In determining that each of the trademarks has an indefinite life, management considered the factors found in paragraph 11 of SFAS No. 142. Management believes that each of the trademarks has the continued ability to generate cash flows indefinitely. Management’s determination that the trademarks have indefinite lives includes an evaluation of historical cash flows and projected cash flows for each of the trademarks. The Company continues making investments to market and promote each of these brands, and management continues to believe that the market opportunities and brand extension opportunities will generate cash flows for an indefinite period of time. In addition, there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, economic or other factors to limit the useful life of these trademarks, and management intends to renew each of these trademarks, which can be accomplished at little cost.
The Company recorded goodwill for each of the four acquisitions noted above. The acquired businesses were fully integrated into and are included in the Company’s Branded Products business segments. Consequently, goodwill is attributable to either the Company’s Manufactured Snack Products or Processed Berry business segments.
25
Advertising and Promotional Expenses and Trade Spending. The Company expenses production costs of advertising the first time the advertising takes place, except for cooperative advertising costs which are expensed when the related sales are recognized. Costs associated with obtaining shelf space (i.e., “slotting fees”) are accounted for as a reduction of revenue in the period in which such costs are incurred by the Company. Anytime the Company offers consideration (cash or credit) as a trade advertising or promotional allowance to a purchaser of products at any point along the distribution chain, the amount is accrued and recorded as a reduction in revenue. Marketing programs that deal directly with the consumer, primarily consisting of in-store demonstrations/samples and a sponsorship with a professional baseball team, are recorded as a marketing expense in selling, general and administrative expenses. Further discussion is set forth below:
• Demonstrations/Samples: The Company periodically arranges in-store product demonstrations with club stores (i.e., Sam’s, Costco or BJ’s) or grocery retailers. Product demonstrations are conducted by independent third party providers designated by the various retailer or club chains. During the in-store demonstrations the consumers in the stores receive small samples of the Company’s products, and consumers are not required to purchase the products in order to receive the samples. The cost of product used in the demonstrations, which is insignificant, and the fee the Company pays to the independent third party providers who conduct the in-store demonstrations are recorded as a sales and marketing expense in selling, general and administrative expenses. When the Company conducts in-store product demonstrations, it does not pay or give any consideration to the club stores or grocery retailers in which the demonstrations occur.
• Sponsorship: The Company has one sponsorship with the Arizona Diamondbacks Major League Baseball team which takes place during their baseball season. The Company does not sell product to the Arizona Diamondbacks, but the sponsorship clearly involves an identifiable benefit as the fans at the stadium see the Company’s name on the main scoreboard during each game and the value is reasonably estimated due to the fact that the team charges a fixed amount per game which the Company records as a sales and marketing expense in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Income Taxes. The Company has been profitable since 1999; however, it experienced significant net losses in prior fiscal years resulting in a net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward for federal income tax purposes at December 30, 2006. Generally accepted accounting principles require that the Company record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset associated with this NOL if it is “more likely than not” that the Company will not be able to utilize it to offset future taxes.
Stock-Based Compensation. On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 123R, “Share-Based Payment”, under the modified prospective method. SFAS 123R requires us to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for stock options granted using the fair value method as of the beginning of 2006. The Company accounts for stock options under the fair value method of accounting using a Black-Scholes valuation model to measure stock option fair values at the date of grant. All stock option grants have a 5-year term. The fair value of stock option grants are expensed over the vesting period, generally three years for employees and one year for the Board of Directors.
The above listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of the Company’s accounting policies. In many cases the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by generally accepted accounting principles, with no need for management’s judgment in their application. See the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006 which contains accounting policies and other disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
26
New Accounting Policies
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that the Company recognize in its financial statements the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective as of the beginning of our 2007 fiscal year, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The adoption of FIN 48 on December 31, 2006 (the first day of fiscal year 2007) did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The principal market risks to which the Company is exposed that may adversely impact the Company’s results of operations and financial position are changes in certain raw material prices and interest rates. The Company has no market risk sensitive instruments held for trading purposes.
Raw materials used by the Company are exposed to the impact of changing commodity prices. The Company’s most significant raw material requirements include potatoes, potato flakes, wheat flour, corn and oil and with the acquisition of Rader Farms, purchased berries to meet customer demands. The Company attempts to minimize the effect of future price fluctuations related to the purchase of raw materials primarily through forward purchasing to cover future manufacturing requirements, generally for periods from one to 12 months. Futures contracts are not used in combination with the forward purchasing of these raw materials. The Company’s procurement practices are intended to reduce the risk of future price increases, but also may potentially limit the ability to benefit from possible price decreases. Inflation and changing prices have not had a material impact on the Company’s net revenues and net income. Increased transportation costs, driven by higher fuel prices, could result in higher commodity costs in the future.
The Company entered into an interest rate swap in 2006 to effectively convert the interest rate of the mortgage to purchase the Bluffton, Indiana plant to a fixed rate of 6.85%. The swap is not accounted for as a cash flow hedge. The swap has a fixed pay-rate of 6.85% and a notional amount of approximately $2.4 million at September 29, 2007 and expires in December, 2016. The value of the swap was not material at September 29, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
The Company’s primary concentration of credit risk is related to certain trade accounts receivable. In the normal course of business, the Company extends unsecured credit to its customers. Substantially all of the Company’s snack product customers are distributors or retailers whose sales are concentrated in the grocery industry throughout the United States and substantially all of our Rader Farms’ subsidiary sales are concentrated in the wholesale industry throughout the United States. The Company investigates a customer’s credit worthiness before extending credit. Three customers (Wal*Mart, Vistar and Costco) accounted for approximately 33% of the Company’s net revenues for the quarter ended September 29, 2007 and for approximately 27% of the Company’s accounts receivable balance at the end of the quarter.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report have been designed and are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
27
(b) Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer do not expect that the Company’s internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of internal controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company is periodically a party to various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes, based on discussions with legal counsel, that the resolution of such lawsuits, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
The Inventure Group, Inc. is one of eight companies sued by the Environmental Law Foundation in August, 2006 in the Superior Court for the State of California for the County of Los Angeles by the Attorney General of the State of California for alleged violations of California Proposition 65. California Proposition 65 is a state law that, in part, requires companies to warn California residents if a product contains chemicals listed within the statute. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and penalties but has made no specific demands. We continue to vigorously defend this suit.
During the quarter ended September 29, 2007, there were no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006 other than those noted below:
The Inventure Group, Inc. is one of eight companies sued by the Environmental Law Foundation in August, 2006 in the Superior Court for the State of California for the County of Los Angeles by the Attorney General of the State of California for alleged violations of California Proposition 65. California Proposition 65 is a state law that, in part, requires companies to warn California residents if a product contains chemicals listed within the statute. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and penalties but has made no specific demands. We continue to vigorously defend this suit.
Risks Related to the Rader Farms Business
Farming is subject to numerous inherent risks including changes in weather conditions or natural disasters that can have an adverse impact on crop production and materially affect our results of operations.
The Company, through its subsidiary Rader Farms, Inc. is subject to the risks that generally relate to the agricultural industry. Change in weather conditions and natural disasters, such as earthquakes, droughts, extreme cold or pestilence, may affect the planting, growing and delivery of crops, reduce sales stock, interrupt distribution, and have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operation. Our competitors may be affected differently by such weather conditions and natural disasters depending on the location of their supplies or operations.
28
Revenues are derived from one brand; the loss or impairment of this brand may have a material adverse effect on operating results.
Rader Farms derives the majority of its revenue from the sales of one brand. The Company’s net revenues are predominantly attributable to the Rader Farms® brand of frozen berries. A decrease in the popularity of frozen berries during any year could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that the Rader Farms® brand will retain its historical level of popularity or increase in popularity. Decreased sales from the Rader Farms® brand of frozen berries would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
The majority of revenues are derived from one predominant customer; the loss of this customer may have a material adverse effect on operating results.
Costco accounted for approximately 58% of Rader Farms’ net revenues for the quarter ended September 29, 2007 with the remainder of Rader Farms’ net revenues being derived from sales to a limited number of additional customers, predominantly to wholesale customers. A decision by Costco to cease or substantially reduce its purchases could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.
The loss of the general manager of Rader Farms could adversely affect our business.
Rader Farms’ success is dependent in large part upon the ability of Rader Farms’ general manager Brad Rader. The inability of Mr. Rader to perform his duties or the inability of Rader Farms to attract and retain other highly qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s business and prospects. Mr. Rader is signed to an employment agreement through May, 2010.
Unavailability of purchased berries, at reasonable prices, could materially adversely affect our operations.
The Company’s manufacturing costs are subject to fluctuations in the prices of certain commodity prices. Berries are not readily available year-round, therefore, the Company uses an individual quick frozen (IQF) technique to freeze the berries harvested for use during the year to meet processing demands. In addition to freezing our own home-grown berries, we also purchase a significant amount of berries from outside suppliers to meet customer demands. The Company is dependent on its suppliers to provide the Company with adequate supply and on a timely basis. The failure of certain suppliers to meet the Company’s performance specifications, quality standards or delivery schedules could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations. In particular, a sudden scarcity, a substantial price increase, or an unavailability of certain types of berries could materially adversely affect the Company’s operations. There can be no assurance that alternative products would be available when needed and on commercially attractive terms, if at all.
We may incur material losses and costs as a result of product liability claims that may be brought against us or any product recalls we have to make.
The sale of food products for human consumption involves the risk of injury to consumers. Such hazards could result from: tampering by unauthorized third parties; product contamination (such as listeria, e-coli, and salmonella) or spoilage; the presence of foreign objects, substances, chemicals, and other agents; residues introduced during the growing, storage, handling or transportation phases; or improperly formulated products. There can be no assurance that the product liability insurance maintained by the Company will be adequate to cover any loss or exposure for product liability, or that such insurance will continue to be available on terms acceptable to the Company. Any product liability claim not fully covered by insurance, as well as any adverse publicity from a product liability claim or product recall, could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
29
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
None.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15(d)-14(a). | |
|
|
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15(d)-14(a). |
|
|
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
30
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: | November 13, 2007 |
| THE INVENTURE GROUP, INC. | |||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| By: | /s/ Eric J. Kufel |
| |||
|
|
| Eric J. Kufel | |||
|
|
| Chief Executive Officer | |||
|
|
| (Principal Executive Officer) | |||
31