The registrant's revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 were $14,117,000.
The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2003 was $8,500,972.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock as of February 28, 2004 was 17,350,076.
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to shareholders in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 17, 2004 are incorporated by reference into Part III.
Part I
Item 1
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of the words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," " intend," "estimate," "assume," and other similar expression which predict or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters. The Company's actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from our expectations expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements sometimes for reasons that are beyond the Company's control. Such reasons include, without limitation: the existence of other suppliers of optical components and illumination products, who may have greater resources than the Company; the risk that the Company's products may infringe patents held by other parties; the uncertainty that the Company's significant investments in R&D will result in products that achieve market acceptance; the Company's ability to attract and maintain key personnel; whether the Company is able to design products to meet the special needs of its customers; and that market conditions could make it more difficult or expensive for the Company to obtain the necessary capital to finance necessary research and development projects, operations as well as its ability to refinance existing debt. Additional factors that might cause such a difference are discussed in the section entitled "Certain Factors Affecting Future Operating Results" beginning on page 23 of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
StockerYale, Inc. (the Company) is an independent designer and manufacturer of structured light lasers, light emitting diodes, (LEDs), fiber optic, and fluorescent illumination technologies as well as specialty optical fiber, phase masks, and advanced optical sub-components for use in a wide range of markets and industries including the machine vision, telecommunications, aerospace, defense and security, utilities, industrial inspection, and medical markets.
DEVELOPMENTS DURING FISCAL 2003
As outlined as priorities for 2003 in the Company's Fiscal 2002 Form 10-K Management Plan, during Fiscal 2003 management was successful in renegotiating its credit facilities and securing new financing; increasing revenues; reducing both operating expenses and losses; and improving cash flow. The key developments in Fiscal 2003 were:
- Revenues in 2003 increased $1.1 million or 9% compared to 2002. Excluding the printer and recorder product line revenues of $1.1 million in 2002 and $0.2 million in 2003, which was transferred to an outside distributor in the fourth quarter of 2002, revenues increased $2.0 million or 17%.
- Gross margins improved $1.1 million or 61%.
- Operating expenses in 2003 decreased $3.8 million or 22% compared to 2002. Excluding non-cash asset impairment charges of $1.9 million in 2003 and $1.6 million in 2002, operating expenses decreased $4.1 million or 27% from $15.5 million in 2002 to $11.4 million in 2003.
- Increased year-end order backlog $0.5 million or 23% from $2.2 million in 2002 to $2.7 million in 2003.
- Closed a $1.2 million equity and convertible debt placement in the third quarter with several of the Company's institutional investors.
- Closed a $2.5 million convertible note in the third quarter with Laurus Master Funds, LTD.
- StockerYale Ireland received a $0.8 million order for custom designed, light-emitting diode (LED) illuminators from an European OEM customer.
- StockerYale Asia received a $0.4 million order for advanced imaging systems from a large Asian disc drive manufacturer.
3 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part I
Item 1
COMPANY HISTORY
StockerYale, Inc. was incorporated on March 27, 1951 under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts . In December 1995, the Company completed the registration of its Common Stock with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and its stock now trades on the NASDAQ National Market under the trading symbol "STKR".
On May 13, 1998 , the Company acquired StockerYale Canada, Inc., formerly known as Lasiris, Inc., a Canadian manufacturer of industrial lasers and other illumination and photonics products. The acquisition of StockerYale Canada provided the Company with the capability to manufacture laser-based illumination products and phase masks, which are used to manufacture fiber Bragg gratings for telecommunication applications.
The Company acquired StockerYale Canada through Lasiris Holdings, Inc., a newly formed New Brunswick corporation ("LHI") and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. StockerYale Canada is operated as a wholly owned Canadian subsidiary of LHI. In connection with this transaction, the former stockholders of StockerYale Canada received shares of capital stock in LHI, which are exchangeable into shares of the Company's common stock on a one-for-one basis at any time at the option of the holder.
In addition to Lasiris Holdings, Inc., the Company has two active subsidiaries. On June 16, 2000 , the Company acquired StockerYale (IRL) Ltd., formerly known as CorkOpt Ltd, which is a wholly owned Irish subsidiary and StockerYale Asia PTE Ltd., formerly known as Radiant Asiatec Pte, Ltd., a Singapore corporation that was formed in December 1997 and is an 80% owned subsidiary of the Company. The acquisition of StockerYale (IRL) Ltd. provided the Company with the capability to manufacture and sell light-emitting diodes, or LEDs, for industrial applications. StockerYale Asia PTE Ltd. is the entity through which the Company sells its illumination products in Southeast Asia .
As of February 28, 2004, the authorized capital stock of the Company was 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock of which 17,350,076 shares were issued and outstanding. Additionally, 10,329,596 shares of Common Stock were reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding options and warrants to purchase Common Stock and upon the exchange of 84,721 shares of Lasiris Holdings, which are exchangeable into Company Common Stock on a one-for-one basis.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
The Company operates within two segments, namely illumination and optical components. Illumination products include structured light lasers, specialized fiber optic, fluorescent, and light-emitting diode (LED) products for the machine vision, industrial inspection, and defense and security industries. The optical components segment includes communication and sub-component and specialty optical fiber for the telecommunications, aerospace, utility and medical markets.
PRODUCTS
ILLUMINATION PRODUCTS
StockerYale is a leading developer and manufacturer of specialized illumination products for the inspection, machine vision, medical, and military markets and continues to be the only company with design and manufacturing competencies in four illumination disciplines: fiber optic, fluorescent, structured light laser, and light emitting diode (LED) technologies. The Company also differentiates itself from many of its competitors by delivering custom designed lighting solutions that can operate as a stand-alone illumination source or as an integral component of a larger OEM system.
The Company's fiber optic illumination products provide shadow-free, glare-free, cool illumination by way of a halogen light source (i.e., fiber optic illuminator) and the components (i.e., fiber optic light guide) that carry the illumination output to the intended location.
4 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part I
Item 1
StockerYale manufactures high output, 0.66 and 0.55 numerical aperture (N.A.) glass fiber, in addition to polymer clad fused silica (quartz) fiber that is used in its fiber optic components, providing customers with the lighting solution that best fits their application. StockerYale's illumination fiber is internally produced in its Salem drawing facility rather than outsourced. This ensures that a higher quality of light demanded by increasingly sophisticated imaging systems and advanced quality assurance processes is delivered.
StockerYale has over twenty years experience designing and manufacturing high-quality fluorescent illumination products that are primarily used in microscopy and machine vision applications. The Company's fluorescent illuminators provide the critical lighting needs for a diversity of microscopes and cameras that are widely used for inspection in the semiconductor and disk drive manufacturing industries as well as machine vision applications. StockerYale has the most comprehensive line of fluorescent products available and believes that its Model 9 circular fluorescent microscope illuminator (CFMI) is one of the world's leading microscope illuminators. The Company also custom designs fluorescent illumination systems to meet a customer's exact lighting requirements.
For customers looking for a compact, long lasting illumination source, StockerYale offers LED lighting systems. The Company's patented, state-of-the-art, chip-on-board LED units draw less power and are not subject to the influences of oxidation that other lighting technologies endure, resulting in a life span of over 60,000 hours. Furthermore, because of the intrinsic characteristics of LEDs, which can be engineered into virtually any geometric configuration, StockerYale's LED's are ideal for specialized illumination applications within the semiconductor and electronics and also the medical industries that require the properties and benefits that only this lighting technology can deliver.
StockerYale's Lasiris TM brand laser pattern projectors are used in the industrial inspection and 3-D machine vision industries and have most recently been introduced into the medical and military industries for specialized applications. The Company's patented optical lens produces a non-Gaussian (evenly illuminated) distinct laser line or a more complex laser light pattern that maintains a consistent intensity along the length and height of the projection. StockerYale's lasers are electrostatic discharge (ESD) protected, feature interchangeable head patterns, and most meet Class II eye safety ratings. By applying nearly 15 years of electro-optic R&D experience, the Company offers custom designed laser pattern projectors that meet even the most stringent requirements.
Lasers can be useful for contour mapping of parts, surface defect detection, depth measurements, guidelines, edges detection, and alignment. For example, in machine vision applications, structured light lasers may be used on systems recording the gap and flushness between car body components. In industrial inspection applications, these products may draw attention to parts that do not conform to specifications, such as defective parts.
OPTICAL COMPONENTS
StockerYale is an independent designer and manufacturer of specialty optical fiber and phase masks that are primarily used by fiber optic sensor, fiber optic gyroscope and telecommunication equipment manufacturers around the world.
Today, the Company is a leading supplier of phase masks, which are high precision phase diffraction gratings used as both a key enabling technology for the production of fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) and for biomedical applications. FBGs offer a passive fiber-based means of filtering and stabilizing wavelengths to improve the performance of optical components used in various telecommunication and sensor applications. The Company also has the technical expertise and R&D facilities to optimize or custom design a phase mask that supports a special wavelength operation or tailor the mask dimensions to satisfy a customer's specific application.
The phase mask product line is sold by a direct sales force in North America and Europe and through distributor channels in Asia .
StockerYale designs and produces high-quality specialty optical fiber for both industry standard and custom applications.
5 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part I
Item 1
StockerYale's specialty optical fiber fall into five broad categories: rare-earth doped fibers, polarization maintaining fibers, photosensitive fibers, bend insensitive fibers and custom designed fibers. These specialty optical fibers support a diverse range of applications, including erbium-doped fiber amplifiers, (EDFAs), fiber Bragg gratings, (FBGs), high-voltage current sensors, gyroscopes, and other applications related to optical fiber sensors and telecommunications.
The Company is currently marketing six classes of specialty optical fibers: Polarization Maintaining, Bend Insensitive Erbium-doped, Photosensitive, Select Cut-off and Polyimide Coated. Polarization Maintaining Fiber is used in Fiber Optic Gyroscopes, Current Sensors and with Polarization sensitive components, representing some of our biggest markets. The fiber is also used for pig-tailing source lasers in the telecommunications market. Bend Insensitive Fiber is used in devices such as Fiber Optic Hydrophones. Fiber Optic Hydrophones are in large volumes for mapping the ocean floor in both the oil exploration and military markets. Select Cut-off fibers are used for connecting lasers to optical networks and for coupling light into optical devices. Erbium-doped fiber is used to manufacture Erbium-doped fiber amplifiers, a critical component in today's optical networks. Photosensitive fiber is used in the fabrication of FBGs, a filter used in optical networks and sensors to selec t specific wavelengths. Polyimide coated fiber is used in both harsh environments such as oil well monitoring and exploration as well as in medical devices. StockerYale is involved in developing custom designed fibers to meet the needs of its customers; such fibers are specifically tailored to meet stringent requirements of the Company's customers and is often financed by the customer.
Optical fibers can be simply categorized as either long-haul fiber or as specialty optical fiber, which is used to manage the behavior of light waves as they pass through an optical network. Long-haul fibers are low-cost, high-volume products manufactured by Corning , Furukawa (the former Lucent OFS business), and Alcatel. Specialty optical fibers are high-cost, low-volume products made by FiberCore ( England ), 3M, Nufern, and the companies who also make the long-haul fibers.
Since other specialty optical fiber suppliers also compete with their customers in other optical components markets, StockerYale believes that long-term it is uniquely positioned to satisfy the growing market demand for independently produced, high-quality specialized optical fiber. Consistent with this goal, the Company has built specialty optical fiber capacity to fulfill the need for an independent SOF developer and supplier with significant capacity.
The Company has capitalized on its proprietary knowledge of phase masks, used in the manufacture of fiber Bragg gratings, to expand into diffraction gratings, which are used in the military, biomedical, test & measurement, laser, and sensor markets.
SALES DATA
Specialized illumination and optical sub-component products represent 92% and 7%, respectively, of 2003 revenues, 83% and 9%, respectively, in 2002 and 69% and 23%, respectively, in 2001. Printer and recorder product sales represented 1% of revenues in 2003, and 8% in 2002 and 2001.
DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN REVENUE
Sales to unaffiliated customers in foreign countries represented 48%, 40% and 38% of net revenues in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION
The Company's products are sold to over 2,000 customers, primarily in North America , Europe and the Pacific Rim . The Company sells directly to, and works with, a group of approximately 50 distributors and machine vision integrators to sell its specialized illumination products. Optical components are sold directly to OEM customers by the Company's sales organization.
6 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part I
Item 1
COMPETITION AND COMPETITIVE POSITION
The Company competes with a number of firms in the design and manufacture of its specialized illumination, optical fiber and sub-component products. Some competitors have greater resources than the Company, and as a result, may have competitive advantages in the research and development and sales and distribution.
In the industrial fluorescent lighting market, the Company has two primary competitors. MicroLite markets a product similar in appearance to the Company's circular fluorescent microscope illuminator. Techni-Quip Corporation offers industrial fluorescent lighting as part of its product line but as a whole, its lighting product line is limited and represents a small percentage of that company's total business.
The Company has five primary competitors in the fiber optic illumination market. The most established segment of this market relates to illumination for microscopes. Within that market, Volpi Manufacturing USA, Inc. and Dolan-Jenner Industries, Inc. compete directly with the Company's products. Both of these companies have been producing fiber optic products for more than thirty years and offer a complete line of fiber optic illumination systems for microscopy applications. A third company, Cuda Products, Inc., also supplies fiber optic lighting for microscopy; however, its primary market is medical. The value-oriented segment of the microscopy market is dominated by Chiu Technical Corp, which offers an inexpensive, "no-frills", fiber optic lighting system. A newer segment in the fiber optic lighting market relates to automated imaging and inspection equipment for machine vision. Schott-Fostec, Inc. is the leading provider of fiber optic lighting for the machine visi on industry.
The Company has developed the in-house capability to draw its own glass fiber in variable dimensions to suit customer needs. Although some of the above-named competitors also have this capability, the Company believes that its proprietary manufacturing techniques result in fiber that has increased reliability. Since mid-1996, the Company has invested in developing its in-house design and research capabilities, including the hiring of personnel trained in optical, chemical, mechanical and electrical engineering and related disciplines, and the purchase of computers and laboratory equipment necessary to support these personnel. Further, the Company has succeeded in designing and developing a complete line of fiber optic lighting products for both the machine vision and microscopy markets.
Over the last eighteen months, the Company completed a program to expand its specialty optical fiber capability to include specialty optical fibers (SOF) for the defense and security, utility and telecommunication industries. The Company made substantial capital investments in plant and equipment in connection with its development of a complete line of specialty optical fibers (SOF). The Company's major competitors in this area include OFS, formally Lucent's Optical Fiber Solutions division, Corning , and 3M. With OFS (now owned by Furukawa), Corning and 3M consuming the majority of their SOF products internally, the Company believes it is positioned to be a leading independent supplier of SOF.
BACKLOG
The Company maintains an inventory of standard materials and components and generally manufactures standard illumination product configurations within one to five days after receipt of a customer order. The optical components and specialty optical products are generally manufactured to specifications of the customer order with a one to four week turnaround between order and shipment. Although such rapid response is, and historically has been, a selling advantage for the Company, some orders are placed for future delivery. At December 31, 2003 , the Company had a backlog of orders for future delivery of approximately $2.7 million compared to approximately $2.2 million as of December 31, 2002 . The $0.5 million increase in the backlog was the result of a significant improvement in laser back orders during the fourth quarter of 2003.
RAW MATERIALS
The raw materials and components used in the Company's products are purchased from a number of different suppliers and are generally available from several sources.
7 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part I
Item 1
DEPENDENCE ON ONE OR A FEW MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The Company's customer base consists of more than 2,000 customers in various industries worldwide. Sales to the Company's largest single customer represented 8% of the Company's total net sales in fiscal 2003. The Company's top ten customers represented approximately 34% of total net sales in fiscal 2003 and 32% in 2002 and 2001.
PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
The Company holds patents in the United States and Ireland and has filed additional patent applications in the United States , Canada , Europe and Japan . StockerYale (IRL), Ltd holds a patent on a method for attaching semiconductor chips and has applied for two patents in the United States , Canada and Europe on new LED ring light and line light technologies. StockerYale Canada holds exclusive rights to three patents in the United States and one patent in Canada through licensing agreements. A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, Innovative Specialty Optical Fiber Components LLC, has applied for a patent in the United States on a fiber optic technology for depolarizing light. A 49% owned joint venture of the Company, Optune Technologies, Inc. has applied for two patents in the United States on a tunable optical filter for optical communications.
The Company has four patents relating to fundamental technological devices and methodologies used to achieve low-cost fluorescent light dimming; these patents expire on August 18, 2009 , August 24, 2010 , September 6, 2011 and September 13, 2011 . StockerYale Canada 's material patents consist of four patents for lenses, which expire on May 2, 2006 , November 27, 2007 , June 4, 2013 and December 15, 2015 . The Company believes that patents are an effective way of protecting its competitive technological advantages, and considers its patents to be a strong deterrent against unauthorized manufacture, use and sale of its products and key product attributes. There can be no assurance, however, that a patent will be issued with respect to the Company's pending patent applications or whether the Company's patents or license rights will provide meaningful protection for the Company.
The Company also relies upon trade secret protection for its confidential and proprietary information. There can be no assurance that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques, or otherwise gain access to and use or disclose the Company's trade secrets or that the Company can meaningfully protect its trade secrets.
The Company holds rights in certain trademarks to protect its brand name recognition in various markets. Because of the Company's long history and reputation for designing and manufacturing high quality products, trademark protection enhances the Company's position in the market.
Although the Company believes that its products and other proprietary rights do not infringe the proprietary rights of third parties, there can be no guarantee that infringement claims will not be asserted against the Company in the future or that any such claims will not require the Company to enter into royalty arrangements or result in costly litigation.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Company intends to continue to invest significant amounts in research and development for new products and for enhancements to existing products. Research and development expenditures for the Company were $3.7 million or 26% of net revenues in 2003 and $6.2 million or 48% of net revenues in 2002. The $2.5 million or 41% reduction in research and development expenses was the result of reduced research and development activities which resulted in lower salaries and benefits, lower development costs and the elimination of research and development joint venture expenditures.
8 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part I& II
Items 2, 3
COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS
The Company is subject to evolving Federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Compliance with such laws and regulations in the past has had no material effect on the capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position of the Company. The Company believes that it complies in all material respects with existing environmental laws and regulations applicable to it. However, the Company's Salem , New Hampshire headquarters are currently the subject of environmental testing and monitoring relating to soil and groundwater contamination that occurred under prior ownership. The costs incurred to date for such testing and for remediation planning have been paid by third parties. The Company believes that the costs of any required remediation will be covered by an environmental indemnity obtained from the seller, John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company. In addition, it is management's understanding that in April 1996, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection circulated notices to parties identified as "potentially responsible parties" with respect to the Company's Salem , New Hampshire headquarters. The Company did not receive such notice. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations in the future may require additional capital expenditures, and the Company expects that in the foreseeable future such capital expenditures will be financed by cash flow from operations.
EMPLOYEES
As of February 28, 2004 , the Company employed approximately 150 people, of whom 4 were part-time employees. None of the Company's employees are represented by a labor union and the Company believes that it has good relations with its employees.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We maintain a website at www.stockeryale.com We make available through our website free of charge, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file those reports with, or furnish them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. We also similarly make available, free of charge though our website, the reports filed with the SEC by our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders pursuant to Section 16 under the Exchange Act. We are not including the information contained at www.stockeryale.com at any other Internet address as part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company conducts its business at two Company owned facilities and in two leased facilities. The Company's headquarters are located in a 95,000 square foot facility in Salem, New Hampshire, which also houses research and development, manufacturing, sales and distribution functions for the Company's specialized lighting and specialty optical fiber products. In December 2000, the Company purchased a 65,000 square foot building and property located in Dollard-des-Ormeaux, Quebec for research and development, manufacturing, and sales and distribution by its Canadian subsidiary, StockerYale Canada. StockerYale Asia Pte, Ltd. operates out of an approximately 2,733 square foot leased office space in Singapore. StockerYale (IRL), Ltd leases approximately 5,500 square feet in Cork, Ireland.
At the end of 2003, the Company's Salem facility was owned by the Company subject to a mortgage granted to TJJ Corporation, which secured obligations of the Company to such party. As of February 25, 2004 , the Company paid the TJJ mortgage in full including outstanding principal and accrued interest. Also, as of February 25, 2004, Laurus Master Funds, LTD entered into a first mortgage on the Company's Salem facility. The Company's Canadian facility in Dollard-des-Ormeaux is owned by the Company subject to a mortgage granted to the National Bank of Canada , which secures obligations of the Company to such party. See "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS-Liquidity and Capital Resources."
The Company's facilities are generally operated on the basis of one shift per day, five days per week. Management considers the facilities to be in generally good condition, to be adequately maintained and insured, and sufficient to satisfy the Company's needs for the foreseeable future.
9 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Items 3 - 5
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
At times, the Company may be involved in disputes and/or litigation with respect to its products and operations in its normal course of business. The Company does not believe that the ultimate impact of the resolution of such matters would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. The Company is not currently involved in any legal proceedings.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On August 26, 2003 , the Company requested its shareholders to approve a proposal for the Board of Directors to choose either one of three reverse stock split options or none. The proposal was submitted to shareholders to allow the Company to maintain a minimum bid price and continue to be listed on the NASDAQ National Market. The shareholders approved the proposal on October 16, 2003 , however, the Company subsequently regained compliance with the listing requirements in the normal course of trading and no action was taken by the Board of Directors.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol STKR. On February 28, 2004 , there were 2,879 registered holders of record of the Company's common stock. The Company has not paid and does not intend to pay cash dividends on its common stock. The high and low common stock prices per share were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Quarter Ended | | Mar. 31 | | June 30 | | Sept. 30 | | Dec. 31 | | Year |
Fiscal 2002 |
Common stock price per share: |
High | | $ | 11.00 | | $ | 7.65 | | $ | 2.84 | | $ | 3.00 | | $ | 11.00 |
Low | | | 6.42 | | | 2.02 | | | 0.69 | | | 0.53 | | | 0.53 |
Fiscal 2003 |
Common stock price per share: |
High | | $ | 1.64 | | $ | 1.00 | | $ | 1.34 | | $ | 1.44 | | $ | 1.64 |
Low | | | 0.59 | | | .050 | | | 0.62 | | | 0.82 | | | 0.50 |
| | | |
Equity Compensation Plan Information |
Plan Category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 3,552,673 | $5.86 | 5,141 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | None | None | None |
| | | |
Total | 3,552,673 | $5.86 | 5,141 |
10 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Items 6, 7
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data are derived from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements. The data should be read in conjunction with the Company's related financial statements, notes and other information included in this annual report.
In thousands, except earnings per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 |
Statement of Operations Data |
Revenue | | $ | 14,117 | | $ | 12,992 | | $ | 15,581 | | $ | 18,366 | | $ | 11,483 |
Operating loss from continuing operations | | | (10,332) | | | (15,233) | | | (14,156) | | | (1,200) | | | (609) |
Operating loss from discontinued operations | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 43 | | | 6 |
Loss from continuing operations | | | (10,332) | | | (15,508) | | | (13,671) | | | (1,533) | | | (895) |
Loss from discontinued operations | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (191) | | | (1,862) | | | (163) |
Net loss | | | (11,650) | | | (15,508) | | | (13,862) | | | (3,395) | | | (1,058) |
Loss per share from continuing operations--basic and diluted | | | (0.85) | | | (1.22) | | | (1.28) | | | (0.18) | | | (0.12) |
Loss per share from discontinued operations--basic and diluted | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (0.02) | | | (0.21) | | | (0.02) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance Sheet Data |
Total assets | | | 32,689 | | | 41,320 | | | 43,360 | | | 36,981 | | | 16,679 |
Net assets of discontinued operations | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 1,100 | | | 2,092 |
Long-term obligations, net of current portion | | | 3,934 | | | 96 | | | 2,807 | | | 3,708 | | | 4,376 |
Total liabilities | | | 15,458 | | | 16,358 | | | 13,335 | | | 9,082 | | | 12,925 |
Stockholders' equity | | | 17,231 | | | 24,962 | | | 30,025 | | | 27,899 | | | 3,754 |
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR 2003 AND 2002
Management Discussion and Analysis contains statements that are forward-looking. These statements are based on expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially because of factors discussed in "Certain Factors Affecting Future Operating Results." As further discussed in the following Liquidity and Capital Resources section, the Company is experiencing liquidity problems and is in default of its loan agreements.
NET REVENUE
Net revenues in 2003 increased $1.1 million or 9% compared to 2002. Excluding the printer and recorder product line revenue of $1.1 million in 2002 and $0.2 million in 2003, which the Company transferred to an outside distributor in the fourth quarter of 2002, net revenues increased $2.0 million or 17% in 2003. The strong Canadian dollar and Euro relative to the United States dollar represented approximately $0.4 million or 20% of the overall revenue growth.
Net revenues from the Company's specialized illumination products, excluding the printer and recorder product line, increased $2.2 million or 20% led by strong gains in both lasers and LED shipments. Revenues in the second half of 2003 for the structured laser and LED product lines increased 22% over the second half of 2002 and 8% over the first half of 2003, indicating a favorable trend in the demand for custom applications of lighting solutions for OEM customers in the machine vision, military and medical markets.
Revenue from fluorescent and fiber optic illumination products manufactured in the Company's Salem facility increased a modest $0.3 million or 10% as demand for fiber optic applications grew 15% but were partially offset by a 3% decline in shipments of fluorescent products.
11 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
Revenue of laser illumination products manufactured in the Company's Montreal facility increased $0.6 million or 12% to $6.2 million as a result of growth in military applications and new products introduced in the second half of 2003.
Revenues in our Ireland and Singapore subsidiaries increased $1.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively. A large OEM order for a custom designed LED application for a security "ID" application was primarily responsible for the gain in Ireland.
Revenues from the Company's optical fiber and sub-component product line declined $0.2 million or 13% as a $0.3 million decline in phase mask shipments was partially offset by a $0.1 improvements in optical fiber revenues. These product lines continued to be impacted by the two- year economic slump in the telecommunications sector. However, the Company has completed the development of approximately twenty optical fibers during the past year and expects revenues to grow in 2004, particularly in the gyroscope and sensing markets.
Revenues from the printer and recorder product line, which was transferred to an outside distributor in the fourth quarter of 2002, declined from $1.1 million in 2002 to $0.2 million in 2003.
COST OF SALES
Cost of sales in 2003 remained level with 2002 at $11.2 million. Cost of sales is composed of raw materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Raw material costs increased $1.9 million to $6.9 million in 2003 of which higher revenue volume represented approximately $1.0 million. The remaining $0.9 million increase was principally due to inventory write-offs associated with the Company's shift to an OEM model, obsolete inventory related to historical purchases for markets that did not develop as planned and excess inventory of older products replaced by newer products introduced in 2003. Direct labor costs declined $0.2 million as a result of reduced staffing levels in the specialty optical fiber product line. Manufacturing overhead costs declined $1.6 million or 33% principally due to a decrease in overhead salaries related to supporting the telecommunication product lines in both Salem and Montreal .
GROSS PROFIT
Gross Profit increased $1.1 million or 61% from $1.8 million or 14% of revenue in 2002 to $2.9 million or 21% of revenue in 2003. The Company expects gross profits to improve to 30% to 37% in 2004 as a result of manufacturing costs reduction implemented in the second half of 2003.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operating expenses in 2003 decreased $3.8 million or 22% compared to 2002. Excluding non-cash asset impairment charges of $1.9 million in 2003 and $1.6 million in 2002, operating expenses decreased $4.1 million or 27% from $15.5 million in 2002 to $11.4 million in 2003 as all expense categories experienced reduced spending levels. Reduced salaries and fringe benefits, particularly in the specialty fiber optics research and development product line, represented $1.9 million or 45% of the savings.
Selling Expenses
Selling expenses declined $0.6 million or 18% as a $1.0 million reduction in Salem expenses, particularly in the specialty fiber optics product line, were partially offset by higher illumination marketing costs in both Montreal and Ireland. Consolidated salaries and fringe benefits expenses as a result of headcount reductions represented $0.3 million of the savings, while reduced travel and trade shows contributed an additional $0.3 million.
12 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
General and Administrative Expenses
General and Administrative expenses were $1.0 million or 17% lower, largely due to a $0.7 million reduction in Salem expenses. Consolidated salaries and fringe benefits as a result of both reductions in management headcount and compensation represented $0.6 million in savings with reduced legal, travel and maintenance expenses contributing the majority of the additional savings.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and Development expenses declined $2.5 million or 41% as a result of reductions in Salem and Montreal of $2.0 million and $0.5 million, respectively. Salem expenses were reduced in the specialty optical fiber product line and the cessation of funding to the iSOF R & D joint venture. Montreal expenses declined primarily due to the cessation of funding for the Optune R & D joint venture. Consolidated salaries and fringe benefits as a result of headcount reductions declined $1.1 million while joint venture costs dropped an additional $0.5 million. Reduced depreciation costs, as a result of asset impairment charges in recorded in 2002, higher Canadian government development credits and an overall reduction in development expenses accounted for the remaining $0.9 million in savings.
Asset Impairment
The Company recorded assets impairment charges of $1.9 million in 2003. A $0.6 million charge was recorded in the third quarter related to closing its Maryland specialty optical fiber facility and the write-off of equipment deposits for the optical segment of the business. In addition, the Company recorded a $1.3 million charge in the fourth quarter to reduce the carrying value of its Salem headquarters to its fair market value.
Summary
In response to the recession between 2001 and 2003 and the depressed demand in the telecommunications sector, the Company reduced operating expenses $5.1 million or 28% from $18.4 million in 2001 to $13.3 million in 2003. Excluding non-cash asset impairment charges of $1.6 million in 2002 and $1.9 million in 2003, operating expenses decreased $7.0 million or 38% from $18.4 million in 2001 to $11.4 million in 2003. In addition, manufacturing overhead costs, which are included in cost of sales, have been reduced from $4.9 million in 2002 to $3.3 million in 2003. The Company also expects cost reductions implemented in the second half of 2003 will provide an additional $1.0 million of savings on an annualized basis in 2004.
INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSE)
Interest and other income was an expense of $169,000 in 2003 compared to income of $142,000 in 2002. Interest and other income was comprised primarily of foreign exchange costs associated with the weaker US dollar in 2003 compared to $103,000 of interest income for 2002.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense was $1,224,000 in 2003 compared to $417,000 in 2002 as a result of higher interest rates, a higher level of borrowings and debt issuance and warrant amortization costs of $393,000. Interest expenses are expected to be lower in 2004 due to repayment of the Salem mortgage in February 2004 and reduction in overall debt levels as a result of conversion of convertible debt to equity.
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES
The Company has not recorded an income tax benefit during 2003. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets after concluding that it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not be recoverable. The Company recognized $75,000 of income tax benefit related to a tax refund received in Canada which had previously been reserved.
13 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR 2002 AND 2001
NET SALES
Net sales were $13.0 million in 2002 compared to $15.6 million in 2001, a decrease of 17% or $2.6 million.
Net sales from the Company's specialized illumination products were $10.9 million in 2002 compared to $10.8 million in 2001, an increase of $0.1 million or 1%. Sales of fluorescent and fiber optic illumination products manufactured in the Company's Salem facility declined $0.6 million or 14% primarily due to a reduction in demand as a result of a general slow down in the semiconductor, disk drive inspection and electronic assembly markets. Sales of laser illumination products manufactured in the Company's Montreal facility increased $0.7 million or 14% as new products and new applications, especially in the defense industry gained acceptance. Sales from its Irish and Singapore subsidiaries in 2002 were level with 2001. The majority of the Company's sales of specialized illumination products are made for companies in industries who use specialized lighting for industrial inspection and machine vision applications; however, the Company recently made significant inroads in the mi litary and medical markets.
Net sales from the Company's optical fiber and sub-component products were $1.1 million in 2002 compared to $3.6 million in 2001, a decrease of $2.5 million or 67%. A sharp decline in phase masks, which are principally sold to the telecommunications industry, accounted for 95% of the revenue decline in this product line. Revenue from our printer and recorder product line declined from $1.2 million in 2001 to $1.0 million in 2002. A portion of this product line was transferred to an outside distributor on consignment in the fourth quarter of 2002. The Company will be reimbursed beginning in 2003 for inventory transferred to this distributor plus a 5% royalty on future revenues.
COST OF SALES
Cost of sales was $11.2 million in 2002 compared to $11.3 million in 2001, a decrease of 1.3% or $0.1 million. The decrease in cost of sales resulted primarily from a sharp reduction in material cost related to the decline in phase mask revenue, which was offset by higher manufacturing overhead costs and increased obsolete inventory charges related to the printer and recorder product line.
GROSS PROFIT
Approximately $1.2 million of the $2.5 million gross profit decline was a result of the reduced phase mask revenue. The remaining $1.3 million erosion was the result of increased obsolete inventory costs related to the printer and recorder product line and increased depreciation and incremental overhead costs associated with the fiber and optical component product lines in both Salem and Montreal .
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operating expenses decreased $1.3 million from $18.4 million in 2001 to $17.1 million in 2002.
Selling expenses declined $1.0 million or 22% from $4.5 million in 2001 to $3.5 million in 2002. Salaries and fringe benefits remained level despite a 20% reduction in year-end headcount between fiscal 2001 and 2002 as increased staffing in the second half of 2001 was offset by reduced personnel in the second half of 2002. Commission expenses and bad debt expenses declined approximately $0.4 million due to lower revenues and tighter credit controls. Travel and trade show expenses declined approximately $0.2 million as the Company reduced staff and the number of events attended. The remaining $0.4 million in savings was realized through reduced administrative sales support cost, including: postage, telephone, office supplies, and recruiting costs.
Research and development expenses increased $0.7 million or 13% from $5.5 million in 2001 to $6.2 million in 2002. Salaries and fringe benefits increased $0.3 million or 12% as the cost reductions implemented in the second half of 2002 only partially offset the ramp up of staff in the second half of 2001 that continued through the second quarter of 2002. Depreciation expense increased $0.6 million as the equipment investments made in 2001 became operational in 2002.
14 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
General and administrative expenses declined $2.3 million or 30% from $7.8 million in 2001 to $5.5 million in 2002. Salaries and fringe benefit costs declined $0.7 million as a result of reduced headcount and salary reductions for both senior and middle management. Professional fees were reduced $0.5 million as the Company undertook a large portion of services previously outsourced. Travel expenses declined $0.3 million as a result of reduced staff and the use of alternative methods to conduct business with investors, customers, and vendors. Reduced support expenses, including training and recruiting, office supplies, and investor relations materials represented the majority of the remaining savings.
Management reviewed the requirements of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets , which became effective for financial statements issued for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 . Based upon this review and analysis, the Company recorded a $1.6 million asset impairment charge primarily related to a reduction in the carrying value of internal and joint venture research and development projects in Montreal .
The Company terminated further capital expenditures on an internally developed capital project in the second quarter of 2002. At the time, the Company was considering selling the equipment to a third party, based upon the third party receiving funding to purchase the equipment. The Company was informed in the fourth quarter of 2002 that the third party was not successful in obtaining the funding and therefore the Company recorded an impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2002.
The Company ceased funding a joint venture in the second quarter of 2002. At the time, the joint venture was soliciting additional funding from several venture capital firms. The joint venture was informed in the fourth quarter of 2002 that these venture capitalists were not interested in providing additional funding to the joint venture and therefore the Company recorded an impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2002.
INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME
Interest and other income was $142,000 in 2002 compared to $441,000 in 2001. Interest and other income was comprised primarily of $103,000 of interest income for 2002.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense was $417,000 in 2002 compared to $757,000 in 2001 as lower interest rates offset a higher level of borrowings.
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES
The Company has not recorded an income tax benefit during 2002. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets after concluding that it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not be recoverable.
The increase in operating expenses in 2001 versus 2000 was based upon a strategic decision of the Company to invest in the optical component and specialty optical fiber markets.
15 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As discussed in both the previously filed Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2003,June 30, 2003 and September 30, 2003, the Company has raised additional capital to finance operations.
During the second quarter of 2003, the Company completed the refinancing of the Company's Canadian subsidiary's credit facility with the National Bank of Canada and closed a $1.2 million equity and convertible debt placement with several of the Company's institutional investors. The National Bank of Canada credit facility retired the Toronto Dominion (TD) Bank facility. The new facility did provide the Company incremental future financing beyond the levels available under the TD Bank loan agreement. The private placement of $1,200,000 was composed of 1,610,000 shares of common stock at $0.60 per share plus $270,000 of convertible debt at $0.60 per share less issuance expenses.
In the third quarter of 2003, the Company closed a $2.5 million (net proceeds $2.3 million) convertible note with Laurus Master Funds, LTD. The note bears an interest rate of Prime plus 3.5%, but not less than 7.5% and provides Laurus Master Funds with the right to convert the note into common stock at $1.07 per share. In addition, the company established a new $3.5 million credit facility with Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services The Company is currently evaluating various asset disposition options, including both equipment and building sales to reduce debt and improve liquidity.
During the first quarter of 2004, the Company closed an equity private placement of $2.6 million (net proceeds $2.4 million) composed of 2,330,129 shares of common stock at $1.15 per share and a $4.0 million convertible note (net proceeds of $3.7 million) with Laurus Master Funds, LTD. The note bears an interest rate of Prime plus 2% and provides Laurus Master Funds, LTD with the right to convert the note to common stock at $1.30 per share. The combined net proceeds from the private placement and convertible note of $6.1 million were used to retire the TJJ note secured by the Salem facility of $4.4 million and provide additional working capital of $1.7 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2003, cash decreased $2.1 million as net cash used in operations of $5.8 million was partially offset by additional cash from financing activities and asset sales of $3.4 and $0.4 million, respectively. The $5.8 million cash used in operations was the result of a net operating loss of $11.6 million offset by non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization and asset impairment of $2.9 and $1.9 million, respectively. Reduced inventories and other current assets also contributed a combined $1.1 benefit
Net financing activities provided $3.4 million in cash with a private placement of common stock and a convertible note provided $3.3 million cash.
As of December 31, 2003, the Company was not in compliance with the stockholders equity and inventory covenants with the National Bank of Canada.
As of December 31, 2003, the company was in compliance with the additional debt and excess private placement proceeds covenants with Merrill Lynch. However, as a result of the private placement of equity and the Convertible Note discussed in footnote 22 of the financial statements, the Company was not in compliance with the Merrill Lynch covenants during the first quarter of 2004.
The Company subsequently received waivers and/or amendments for both credit agreements, which brought the Company into compliance as of December 31, 2003. The waivers and/or amendments are described in the following section under Borrowing Agreements.
The Company's plans for 2004 are to achieve cash flow breakeven during the second half of the year and to raise sufficient external capital through equity and/or debt financing and asset sales to fund operating losses as necessary. The Company expects to close several of these options during the second quarter of 2004, however, the Company can give no assurances as to the timing and terms of these options. If the Company is unable to raise sufficient funds, the Company may not have adequate capital to sustain operations.
16 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
BORROWING AGREEMENTS
Laurus Master Funds
On September 24, 2003, the Company sold a Convertible Note to Laurus Master Funds, LTD. The $2,500,000 Convertible Note matures on September 24, 2006, bears interest at a rate equal to the Prime Rate plus 3. 5%, but in no event less than 7.5%, and provides the holder with the option to convert the loan to common stock at $1.07 per share subject to certain adjustment features. StockerYale has the right to elect to make the monthly required payments on the convertible note (comprised of principal amortization and interest) in the form of shares of common stock, determined based on the $1.07 conversion price. The Company also issued to the holder seven-year warrants to purchase shares in the following warrant amounts and exercise prices per share of common stock: 225,000 shares at $1.23 per share, 150,000 shares at $1.34 per share and 100,000 shares at $1.44 per share.
The Company can elect to pay monthly principal amortization in cash at 103% of the principal amount. The Company may also elect to pay both principal amortization and interest in common stock, if the market price of the the stock at the time of the payment is 110% of the fixed conversion price. The Company may elect to redeem the principal amount outstanding at 120% within the first year, 115% within the second year and 110% during the third year. The principal amortization payments begin 120 days from the execution of the agreement at a rate of $78,125 per month. As of December 31, 2003, $937,500 has been classified as short-term debt and $1,492,950 has been classified as long-term debt, net of $802,000 related to the debt discount on warrants.
As of December 31, 2003, $2,430,450 was outstanding under the convertible note. The aggregate purchase price of the convertible note and warrants ($2,500,000) was allocated between the note, the common stock conversion option and warrants based upon their relative fair market value. The purchase price assigned to the note, common stock beneficial conversion option and warrants was $1,551,700, $546,650 and $401,650 respectively. The difference between the face amount of the convertible note of $2.5 million and the aggregate purchase price of the convertible note of $1,551,700 was recorded as a debt discount and is being amortized over the life of the convertible note.
TJJ Corporation
On December 27, 2002, the Company entered into a Term Note agreement with TJJ Corporation. The Term Note was a $5,000,000 three-year note due December 26, 2005, secured by the Company's Salem headquarters and bears an interest rate of 8.5%. The Company also issued warrants to purchase shares of the Company's common stock. The warrants can be exercised over a five-year period and each warrant can be exchanged for one share of common stock at a purchase price of $1.35 per share. The aggregate purchase price of the Term Note and the warrants of $5,000,000 was allocated between the Term Note and warrants based upon their relative fair market values. The purchase price assigned to the Term Note and warrants was $4,730,825 and $269,175, respectively. The difference between the face amount of the Term Note and the aggregate purchase price allocated to the Term Note of $4,730,825 was recorded as a debt discount, and is being amortized over the life of the Term Note.
On September 18, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with TJJ Corporation amending the $5,000,000 Term Note maturing on December 26, 2005. The new agreement resulted in loan amortization commencing in October 2003 and a reduction in the stockholders' equity covenant from $22,000,000 to $20,000,000. The new principal amortization beginning in October 2003 was $100,000 per month for three months, $150,000 for the next three months and $200,000 per month for the following eleven months. The maturity was also changed to March 1, 2005. All other terms of the Term Note remained the same. On December 31, 2003, $4,700,000 was outstanding under the Term Note. As of February 25, 2004, the Company paid the note in full including outstanding principal and accrued interest of $4,400,000 and $25,000, respectively, with proceeds from a private placement of equity and a convertible note discussed in footnote 22 of the financial statements.
17 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
Merrill Lynch Financial Services
On September 30, 2003 , the Company entered into an agreement to modify the term of its credit facility with Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services. The new agreement provides a credit facility of $3,450,000 through a term note of $2,450,000 and a line of credit of $1,000,000. The new facility is partially guaranteed (maximum $1,000,000) by an officer of the Company and has a one year maturity and bears an interest rate of one month libor + 5.5%. On December 31, 2003 the interest rate was approximately 6.5%. As of December 31, 2003 , $2,450,000 was outstanding under the term note and approximately $978,000 was outstanding under the line of credit.
The Company's obligations under the credit facility are secured by substantially all the Company's Salem assets, excluding real property. The facility is also subject to various financial covenants, including having a minimum net worth of $10.0 million at all times. The Company is also required to repay amounts under the credit facility using 100% of the net excess proceeds from the sale of its Salem facility; 80% of net proceeds from assets sales and 50% of the net proceeds from equity sales.
On March 25, 2004, the Company entered into an amended agreement with Merrill Lynch. The amended agreement changes the maturity date from October 31, 2004 in the prior agreement to June 30, 2004 in the March 25, 2004 agreement. The amended agreement also increased the interest from libor + 5.5% in the prior agreement to libor + 7.5% in the March 25, 2004 agreement. All other provisions of the September 30, 2003 agreement remained the same.
National Bank of Canada
On May 26, 2003 , the Company entered into a credit agreement with the National Bank of Canada replacing the facility with Toronto Dominion Bank. The new agreement provides total borrowing availability up to $4,050,000 CDN ($3,000,000 US). Initial proceeds were used to pay off the credit agreement with Toronto Dominion Bank.
The credit facility consists of a $2,500,000 CDN ($1,850,000 US) line of credit secured by accounts receivable and inventory bearing a variable interest rate of Canadian prime rate plus 1.5% and a $1,550,000 CDN ($1,150,000 US) ten year term note bearing a variable interest rate of Canadian prime rate plus 2.25%.
On August 23,2003, the Company amended its credit facility with National Bank of Canada reducing the restricted term deposit from C$1,000,000 ($740,000 US) to C$250,000 ($185,000 US) and reducing the term loan from C$2,300,000 ($1,702,000 US) to C$1,550,000 ($1,147,000 US). The net availability of the term loan remained the same. In addition, the bank added Canadian Provincial Government research and development tax credits as additional eligible accounts receivable, which increased the availability of the revolving credit facility by approximately C$300,000 ($222,000 US). All other terms of the credit facility remained the same, including StockerYale, Inc.'s guarantee to fund StockerYale Canada's deficits if requested by the bank.
On November 20, 2003 , the credit facility was amended increasing the interest rate on the line of credit to the Canadian prime rate plus 2.00% and the term note to the Canadian prime rate plus 2.75%.
On March 19, 2004, the Company entered into an amended agreement with the National Bank of Canada. The new agreement includes a line of credit of C$2,500,000 ($1,875,000 US) and a five-year term note of C$1,396,000 ($1,050,000 US). The amended agreement reduced the net worth covenant from C$10,800,000 in the May 26, 2003 agreement to C$8,000,000 in the March 19, 2004 agreement as of December 31, 2003. The amended agreement also requires a C$10,000,000 net worth as of September 30, 2004 and thereafter. The amended agreement also reduced the reduced the inventory component of the line of credit availability from C$750,000 to C$625,000 and requires the Company to achieve specific net profit targets throughout 2004.
As of December 31, 2003 , $1,801,000 CDN ($1,393,000 US) was outstanding under the line of credit and $1,435,000 CDN ($1,110,000 US) was outstanding under the term note. As of December 31, 2003 , the interest rate on the line of credit and the term note were 7.00% and 7.75%, respectively.
18 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
The National Bank of Canada credit facility requires the following financial covenants, including: working capital, net worth, capital expenditures, a financial coverage ratio and maximum inventory levels.
Optune Technologies, Inc.
On October 12, 2000, the Company entered into a joint venture with Dr. Nicolae Miron and formed Optune Technologies, Inc., a Quebec corporation, to develop a new class of tunable optical filters. Under the terms of this joint venture arrangement, the Company owns a 49% equity interest in Optune and the Company initially agreed to contribute an aggregate of $4,000,000 toward all operating costs of the joint venture including salaries, equipment and facility costs. The contributions were to be made over a two-year period pursuant to a fixed milestone schedule. The Company has recorded 100% of the losses associated with the research and development joint venture in the accompanying statement of operations as research and development expense. The Company provided approximately $936,000 CDN ($600,000 USD) through December 31, 2001 and recorded $400,000 USD of research and development expenses related to the joint venture. During 2002, the Company provided $394,000 CDN ($260,000 USD) funding to the joint venture and recorded approximately $287,000 of research and development expenses related to the operating losses.
The Board of Directors of the joint venture, which includes Dr. Nicolae Miron and representatives of StockerYale, (the Joint Venture Board), held four meetings during 2002 to discuss product development progress as well as the market for tunable optical filters in light of the economic conditions that had negatively impacted the telecommunications market.
The Joint Venture Board concluded that although the potential demand for the tunable optical filters was promising, that material product and/or license revenue from the technology in the short term was unlikely. Therefore, the Board on August 8, 2002 unanimously approved an amendment to the original joint venture agreement, whereby StockerYale would cease funding the joint venture and was no longer obligated to fund up to the $4,000,000 as originally contemplated in the joint venture. Both Dr. Miron and StockerYale will continue to own 51% and 49%, respectively of the joint venture.
In the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company determined based upon a lack of funding from the Company and the joint venture's inability to raise additional capital from other sources that the joint venture was impaired. The Company recorded a $474,000 CDN ($308,000 US) asset impairment to write off the Company's remaining investment in the joint venture.
Innovative Specialty Optical Fiber Components LLC
In April 2001, the Company entered into a research and development joint venture agreement to form Innovative Specialty Optical Fiber Components LLC (iSOFC) with Dr. Danny Wong to develop specialty optical fiber products. In exchange for a 60% ownership interest in Innovative Specialty Optical Fiber Components LLC, the Company committed to fund up to $7.0 million over a two-year period to cover all operating costs of the majority owned subsidiary, including salaries, equipment and facility costs. Innovative Specialty Optical Fiber Components LLC has been consolidated by the Company and the Company has recorded 100% of the losses associated with Innovative Specialty Optical Fiber Components LLC as research and development expense in the accompanying income statements. The Company provided approximately $418,000 of funding through December 31, 2001. During the twelve months ending December 31, 2002, the Company has provided $298,000 and recorded $565,000 of research and development expenses relating to the operating losses for the twelve months ending December 31, 2002.
Dr. Wong resigned from iSOFC on May 22, 2002 . In a letter sent to Dr. Wong on August 19, 2002 , iSOFC exercised its right under the Limited Liability Company Agreement to repurchase Dr. Wong's entire equity interest in the joint venture for fair market value. Although he had the right to dispute the repurchase price within ten business days, Dr. Wong did not respond to the exercise notice and the repurchase was effective as of August 29, 2002 . The purchase price for all outstanding shares owned by Dr. Wong was $10,000.
As a result, StockerYale currently owns 100% of iSOFC, which has revised its business plan to operate as a wholly-owned subsidiary of StockerYale funded on a significantly reduced "as needed" basis, and StockerYale is no longer obligated to fund up to the $7,000,000 as originally contemplated in the joint venture.
19 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes the Company's contractual obligations at December 31, 2003 , and the effect such obligations are expected to have on its liquidity and cash flow in future periods:
| Payments due by period |
| Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years |
Debt obligations | $ 13,331 | $ 8,456 | $ 3,669 | $ 1,206 | - |
Capital lease obligations | 64 | 47 | 17 | - | - |
Operating lease obligations | 370 | 185 | 185 | - | - |
| $ 13,765 | $ 8,688 | $ 3,871 | $ 1,206 | - |
(1) Includes approximately $2.4 million of credit lines, which expire during 2004. The Company intends to refinance these credit lines in 2004.
QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ending |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | Q4'03 | | Q3'03 | | Q2'03 | | Q1'03 | | Q4'02 | | Q3'02 | | Q2'02 | | Q1'02 |
Net Revenues | $ 3,277 | | $ 3,670 | | $ 3,586 | | $ 3,584 | | $ 3,105 | | $ 3,456 | | $ 3,523 | | $ 2,908 |
Gross Margin | 263 | | 946 | | 786 | | 949 | | 194 | | 698 | | 616 | | 324 |
Net Loss | ($ 4,657) | | ($ 2,453) | | ($ 2,403) | | ($ 2,137) | | ($ 4,736) | | ($ 2,608) | | ($ 3,669) | | ($ 4,495) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss per share | ($0.32) | | ($0.17) | | ($0.18) | | ($0.17) | | ($0.37) | | ($0.20) | | ($0.29) | | ($0.36) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding basic and diluted | 14,594,659 | | 14,401,330 | | 13,318,737 | | 12,782,070 | | 12,771,524 | | 12,771,524 | | 12,721,153 | | 12,475,382 |
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." This statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity instruments. Implementation of this statement had no material effect on the company's financial statements.
20 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
In January 2003 and December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation for Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46) and its revision, FIN 46-R, respectively. FIN 46 and FIN 46-R address the consolidation of entities whose equity holders have either not provided sufficient equity at risk to allow the entity to finance its own activities or do not possess certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. FIN 46 and FIN 46-R require the consolidation of these entities, known as variable interest entities (VIEs), by the primary beneficiary of the entity. The primary beneficiary is the entity, if any, that is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the VIE's activities, entitled to receive a majority of the VIE's residual returns, or both. FIN 46 and FIN 46-R are applicable for financial statements of public entities that have interests in VIEs or potential VIEs referred to as special purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003, of which the Company had none. Application by public entities for all other types of entities is required in financial statements for periods ending after March 15, 2004. Adoption of FIN 46-R is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
StockerYale's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company's consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States . The preparation of these financial statements requires StockerYale to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, StockerYale evaluates its estimates, including, accounts receivable, inventories, property, plant and equipment and goodwill and intangible assets. StockerYale develops its estimates based on historical experience as well as assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
StockerYale believes the following critical policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The Company reviews the financial condition of new customers prior to granting credit. After completing the credit review, the Company establishes a credit line for each customer. Periodically, the Company reviews the credit line for major customers and adjusts the credit limit based upon an updated financial condition of the customer, historical sales and payment information and expected future sales. The Company has a large number of customers; therefore, material credit risk is limited to only a small number of customers. Sales to the Company's largest customer accounted for 8% of consolidated revenue in 2003. No other customer accounted for more than 6% of revenue in 2003. The Company periodically reviews the collectibility of its accounts receivable. Provisions are established for accounts that are potentially uncollectible. Determining adequate reserves for accounts receivable requires management's judgment. Conditions impacting the collectibility of the Company's receivables could cause actual write-offs to be materially different than the reserved balances as of December 31, 2003.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company recognizes revenue from product sales at the time of shipment and when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, performance of the Company's obligation is complete, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In certain limited situations, customers have the right to return products. Such rights of return have not precluded revenue recognition because the Company has a long history with such returns and accordingly provides a reserve.
21 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
INVENTORY
The Company values inventories at the lower of cost or market using the first in, first-out ("FIFO") method. The Company specifically evaluates historical and forecasted demand of the illumination product line to determine if the carrying value of both finished goods and raw materials is recoverable through future sales. The Company also estimates the impact of increased revenues for new products versus the potential obsolescence of older products on a case-by-case basis. As a result of this analysis, the Company reduced the carrying amount of inventory by approximately $0.7 million in 2003. The Company has not established an inventory reserve for the optical components product line since these products are primarily manufactured based upon a customer order. Actual results could be different from management's estimates and assumptions.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Company's intangible assets consist of goodwill, which is not being amortized commencing in 2002 and beyond and amortizing intangibles, which consist of patents, trademarks and purchased patented technologies, which are being amortized over their useful lives. All intangible assets are subject to impairment tests on a periodic basis.
Note 8 describes the impact of accounting for the adoption of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets , and the annual impairment methodology that the Company will employ on January 1st of each year in calculating the recoverability of goodwill. This same impairment test will be performed at other times during the course of the year should an event occur which suggests that the recoverability of goodwill should be challenged. Amortizing intangibles are currently evaluated for impairment using the methodology set forth in SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of. Recoverability of these assets is assessed only when events have occurred that may give rise to an impairment. When a potential impairment has been identified, forecasted undiscounted cash flows of the operations to which the asset relates are compared to the current carrying value of the long-lived assets present in th at operation. If such cash flows are less than such carrying amounts, long-lived assets, including such intangibles, are written down to their respective fair values. If an impairment loss exists, the amount of the loss will be recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. It is possible that future events or circumstances could cause these estimates to change.
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets, primarily property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. This review is based on the Company's ability to recover the carrying value of the assets from expected undiscounted future cash flows. If an impairment is indicated, the Company measures the loss based on the fair value of the asset using various valuation techniques. If an impairment loss exists, the amount of the loss will be recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. It is possible that future events or circumstances could cause these estimates to change.
INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method. Under this method the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax basis of the assets and liabilities using tax rates expected to be in place when the differences reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
22 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS
Statements, other than historical facts, made herein may constitute forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those, anticipated in such statements. The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results include, without limitation, the Company's ability to, (i) compete with entities that have greater financial, technical and marketing resources than the Company, (ii) develop and market new products in its various business lines, (iii) gain sufficient market acceptance for its fiber products (iv) obtain financing on favorable terms or refinance indebtedness prior to maturity or (v) raise capital through equity or debt to fund anticipated expenditures and (vi) risks inherent with international operations. In addition, general economic conditions worldwide may affect the Company's results.
StockerYale's history of losses and the uncertainty of its future profitability make its Common Stock a highly speculative investment
StockerYale has experienced operating losses during each of the years ending December 31, 2001 , 2002, and 2003, and the Company may continue to incur losses. StockerYale cannot predict the size or duration of any future losses. Even if StockerYale does achieve profitability, the Company may be unable to sustain or increase its profitability in the future.
StockerYale may be unable to fund the initiatives required to achieve its business strategy
In 2002, the Company began to focus its resources on opportunities that would result in near-term revenue and simultaneously reduced its operating expenses by 40% on an annualized basis. In 2003, the Company continued to reduce costs and is currently evaluating the restructuring of its product lines. This restructuring could impact several product lines. While the Company believes these efforts will assist it in improving its financial condition, the Company can give no assurances as to whether its cost reduction and product restructuring efforts will be successful. If StockerYale's cost reduction strategies and efforts to raise additional capital are unsuccessful, the Company may be unable to fund its operations.
The Company has historically experienced operating losses over the last several years and may continue to incur losses. The Company cannot predict the size or duration of any future losses. These operating losses have historically been financed through debt or by the sale of equity in the Company.
The Company's future capital requirements will depend on a number of factors, including its profitability, growth rate, working capital requirements, expenses associated with protection of the Company's patents and other intellectual property, and costs of future research and development activities. Future operating results will depend, in part, on the Company's ability to obtain and manage capital sufficient to finance its business. To the extent that funds currently available or expected to be generated from operations are not sufficient to meet current or planned operating requirements, the Company will seek to obtain additional funds through bank credit facilities, equity or debt financing, collaborative or other arrangements with corporate partners and from other sources. Additional funding may not be available when needed or on acceptable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operatio ns. If adequate funds are not available, the Company may be required to delay or to eliminate certain expenditures; or license or sell a product line or intellectual property; or scale back or cease operations. In addition, in the event that the Company obtains any additional funding, such financing may have a substantially dilutive effect on the holders of the Company's securities.
23 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
An impairment of goodwill and/or long-lived assets could affect net income, as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, as reported by the Company
The Company has goodwill on its balance sheet as a result of business combinations consummated in prior years. The Company has also made a significant investment in long-lived assets. In accordance with applicable accounting standards, the Company periodically assesses the value of both goodwill and long-lived assets in light of current circumstances to determine whether an impairment has occurred. If an impairment should occur, the Company would reduce the carrying amount to its fair market value and record an amount of that reduction as a non-cash charge to income, which could adversely affect the Company's net income reported in that quarter in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company did record a $1,570,000 impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2002. The Company did record impairment charges of $605,000 and $1,300,000 in the third and fourth quarters of 2003. At this time, the Company cannot definitively state whether an impa irment will occur, and if so, the timing or the extent of any such impairment.
StockerYale's ability to continue as a going concern may be dependent on raising additional capital
StockerYale's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis, to comply with the terms and covenants of its financing agreements, to obtain additional financing or refinancing as may be required, and ultimately to operate on a profitable basis. During the third quarter of 2003 the Company issued a Convertible Note in the amount of $2,500,000 to an institutional investor, negotiated new terms and conditions for its credit facility with Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services and amended its credit agreements with National Bank of Canada and TJJ Corporation. During the first quarter of 2004, the Company closed a private placement and a convertible note totaling net proceeds of $6.1 million and retired the outstanding TJJ Corporation term note of $4.4 million. The Company is also pursuing several additional financing options, including: additional equity and/or debt financing and the sale of real estate. There can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in achieving any of its financing options or implementing its restructuring plan.
Failure to comply with credit facility covenants may result in an acceleration of substantial indebtedness
The Company's indebtedness requires it to comply with various financial and other operating covenants, including covenants to make timely payments of principal and interest. Failure to comply with these covenants, without obtaining a waiver from the lender, would permit the lender to accelerate the repayment of all amounts outstanding under the indebtedness. Such an acceleration would have a material adverse effect on the Company's liquidity, financial condition and results of operation.
As of December 31, 2003, the Company was not in compliance with the stockholders equity and inventory covenants with the National Bank of Canada.
As of December 31, 2003, the company was in compliance with the additional debt and excess private placement proceeds covenants with Merrill Lynch. However, as a result of the private placement of equity and the Convertible Note discussed in footnote 22 of the financial statements, the Company was not in compliance with the Merrill Lynch covenants during the first quarter of 2004.
The Company subsequently received waivers and/or amendments for both credit agreements, which brought the Company into compliance as of December 31, 2003. The waivers and/or amendments are described in footnote 13 of the financial statements.
24 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
StockerYale's stock price has been volatile; StockerYale may be subject to litigation due to the volatility of its stock price
StockerYale's stock has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations in recent years. On January 2, 2002 , StockerYale's Common Stock reached $11.10 per share, which was the high in 2002, and, on January 16, 2004 , its Common Stock closed at $1.39 per share. These fluctuations often have no direct relationship to StockerYale's operating performance and there is no assurance that its stock will continue to trade at the current price level. The market price for StockerYale's Common Stock may continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors, some of which are beyond its control.
In the past, some companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been the subject of securities class action litigation. In light of the fluctuations in StockerYale's stock price, it is possible that StockerYale may be the subject of such a securities class action litigation in the future. Such litigation often results in substantial costs and a diversion of management's attention and resources and could harm StockerYale's business, prospects, results of operations, or financial condition.
StockerYale's Common Stock price may be negatively impacted if its trading status on Nasdaq National Market changes
For continued inclusion on the NASDAQ National Market, StockerYale must meet certain tests, including a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share. On September 17, 2003 , the Company received a de-listing notice from NASDAQ stating that if the Company did not meet the $1.00 minimum bid price for ten consecutive days the stock would be de-listed from The Nasdaq National Market as of September 26, 2003 . On September 23, 2003, the Company received notice from The Nasdaq National Market that it had rescinded its letter of September 17, 2003 and that the Company had regained compliance with Marketplace Rule 4450 (a)(5). The Company has remained in compliance with the Nasdaq National Market listing requirements through December 31, 2003 and through the date of filing the Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2003 ; however, there can be no assurances that StockerYale will continue to meet the listing requirements of the Nasdaq National Market in the future.
StockerYale's quarterly results are likely to be volatile
The implementation of StockerYale's business strategy makes prediction of future revenues difficult. StockerYale believes that its ability to accurately forecast revenues from sales of its products is also limited because of the development and sales cycles. This makes it difficult to predict the quarter in which sales will occur.
StockerYale's expense levels are based, in part, on its expectations regarding future revenues, and its expenses are generally fixed, particularly in the short term. StockerYale may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall. Any significant shortfall of revenues in relation to StockerYale's expectations could cause significant declines in the Company's quarterly operating results.
StockerYale's operating results have varied on a quarterly basis during its operating history and are likely to fluctuate significantly in the future. StockerYale's operating results may be below the expectations of its investors as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of the Company's control. Accordingly, StockerYale believes that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of its operating results are not necessarily meaningful. Investors should not rely on the results of one quarter as an indication of StockerYale's future performance.
StockerYale does not plan to pay dividends on the Common Stock
StockerYale has not and does not expect to declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. StockerYale intends to retain all earnings, if any, in order to expand its operations.
25 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 7
StockerYale depends on a limited number of suppliers and may not be able to ship products on time if it is unable to obtain an adequate supply of raw materials and equipment on a timely basis
StockerYale depends on a limited number of suppliers of raw materials and equipment used to manufacture its products. StockerYale typically does not have long-term agreements with its suppliers and, therefore, its suppliers generally may stop supplying materials and equipment to StockerYale at any time. This reliance on a sole or limited number of suppliers could result in delivery problems and reduced control over product pricing and quality.
A small number of affiliated stockholders control a significant portion of StockerYale's stock
As of the date hereof, StockerYale's executive officers and directors as a group beneficially own or control approximately twenty percent (20%) of its Common Stock. Accordingly, these persons will have the ability to significantly influence StockerYale's Board of Directors and, therefore, the business, policies, executive compensation, and affairs of the Company. Furthermore, such influence could preclude any unsolicited acquisition of the Company and, consequently, adversely affect the market price of the Common Stock.
The loss of StockerYale's key personnel or the inability to recruit additional personnel may harm its business
StockerYale is highly dependent on its senior and middle management as well as its technical and research personnel. In particular, the loss of Mark W. Blodgett, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, or other key personnel, could harm the Company significantly. The loss of key management personnel or an inability to attract and retain sufficient numbers of qualified management personnel could materially and adversely affect StockerYale's business, results of operations, financial condition or future prospects.
The Company may not be able to obtain sufficient capital to fund its operating losses.
The Company has historically experienced operating losses over the last several years and may continue to incur losses. The Company cannot predict the size or duration of any future losses. These operating losses have historically been financed through debt or by the sale of equity in the Company.
The Company's future capital requirements will depend on a number of factors, including its profitability, growth rate, working capital requirements, expenses associated with protection of the Company's patents and other intellectual property, and costs of future research and development activities. Future operating results will depend, in part, on the Company's ability to obtain and manage capital sufficient to finance its business. To the extent that funds currently available or expected to be generated from operations are not sufficient to meet current or planned operating requirements, the Company will seek to obtain additional funds through bank credit facilities, equity or debt financing, collaborative or other arrangements with corporate partners and from other sources. Additional funding may not be available when needed or on acceptable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operatio ns. If adequate funds are not available, the Company may be required to delay or to eliminate certain expenditures; or license or sell a product line or intellectual property; or scale back or cease operations. In addition, in the event that the Company obtains any additional funding, such financing may have a substantially dilutive effect on the holders of the Company's securities.
The Company has many competitors in its field and its technologies may not remain competitive.
The Company participates in a rapidly evolving field in which technological developments are expected to continue at a rapid pace. The Company has many competitors in the United States and abroad, including various fiber optic component manufacturers, universities and other private and public research institutions. The Company's success depends upon its ability to develop and maintain a competitive position in the product categories and technologies on which the Company focuses. The introduction of new products incorporating new technologies or the emergence of new industry standards could make it more difficult for the Company's existing products to compete in terms of pricing or functionality. Many of the Company's competitors have greater capabilities, experience and financial resources than the Company. Competition is intense and is expected to increase as new products enter the market and new technologies become available.
26 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Items 7, 7A
The Company's customers are not obligated to buy material amounts of its products and may cancel or defer purchases on short notice.
The Company's customers typically purchase its products under individual purchase orders and may cancel or defer purchases on short notice without significant penalty. Accordingly, sales in a particular period are difficult to predict. Decreases in purchases, cancellations of purchase orders or deferrals of purchases may have a material adverse effect on the Company, particularly if the Company does not anticipate them.
The Company faces risks associated with its international operations.
The Company distributes and sells certain of its products internationally. As a result, the Company is subject to risks associated with operating in a foreign country, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, imposition of limitations on conversion of foreign currencies into dollars or remittance of dividends and other payments by foreign subsidiaries, imposition or increase of withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments on foreign subsidiaries, hyperinflation and imposition or increase of investment and other restrictions by foreign governments. Such risks may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition in the future.
ITEM 7A: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RISK
Management has determined that all of the Company's foreign subsidiaries operate primarily in local currencies that represent the functional currencies of the subsidiaries. All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date, while income and expense accounts are translated at average exchange rates during the year. As such, the Company's operating results are affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar as compared to currencies in foreign countries, as a result of the Company's transactions in these foreign markets. The Company does not operate a hedging program to mitigate the effect of a significant rapid change in the value of the Canadian Dollar or Euro as compared to the U.S. dollar. If such a change did occur, the Company would have to take into account a currency exchange gain or loss in the amount of the change in the U.S. dollar denominated balance of the amounts outstanding at the time of such change. While the Company does not believe such a gain or loss is likely, and would not likely be material, there can be no assurance that such a loss would not have an adverse material effect on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
INTEREST RATE RISK
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, which may adversely affect its financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In seeking to minimize the risks from interest rate fluctuations, the Company manages exposures through its regular operating and financing activities. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through its borrowings under its $1.0 million credit line and $2.5 million term note with Merrill Lynch with an interest rate at 5.5% over the one month LIBOR, a $2,500,000 Convertible Note with Laurus Master Funds with an interest rate of prime plus 3.5% and its $4.0 million CDN credit facility with the National Bank of Canada with interest rates of 2.0% and 2.75% over the Canadian prime rate. As of December 30, 2003 the fair market value of the Company's outstanding debt approximates its carrying value due to the short-term maturities and variable interest rates. A 1% change in interest rates could inc rease or decrease interest expense by approximately $85,000 on an annual basis.
ITEM 8: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The information required by Item 8 is presented on pages 23 through 49 of this Form 10-K.
27 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item | Page |
Independent Auditors' Reports | 28 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 | 30 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2003 , 2002 and 2001 | 31 |
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2003 , 2002 and 2001 | 32 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2003 , 2002, and 2001 | 33 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 34 |
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of StockerYale, Inc.:
Salem, New Hampshire
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of StockerYale, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. Our audits also included the 2003 and 2002 financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a) 2. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits. The consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule for the year ended December 31, 2001, before the inclusion of the goodwill disclosures discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements, were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and stated that such 2001 financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the 2001 basic financial statements taken as a whole, presented fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein, in their report dated February 25, 2002 (except with respect to the matter discussed in Note 18 to the 2001 financial statements, as to which the date was March 8, 2002).
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of StockerYale, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the 2003 and 2002 financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the 2003 and 2002 basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed above, the consolidated financial statements of StockerYale Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2001, were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. As described in Note 8, the 2001 consolidated financial statements have been revised to include the transitional disclosures required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which was adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2002. Our audit procedures with respect to the disclosures in Note 8 with respect to 2001 included (1) comparing the previously reported net loss to the previously issued financial statements and the adjustment to reported net loss representing amortization expense (including any related tax effects) recognized in 2001 related to goodwill to the Company's underlying analysis obtained from management, and (2) testing the mathematical accuracy of the reconciliation of adjusted net loss to reported net loss and the related loss-per-share amounts. In our opinion, the disclosures for 2001 in Note 8 are appropriate. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 consolidated financial statements of the Company other than with respect to such disclosures and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2001 financial statements taken as a whole.
28 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
As discussed in Note 8, in the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill and intangible assets to conform with the provisions of SFAS No. 142.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, at December 31, 2003, the Company's recurring losses from operations, need to obtain additional financing, and its negative working capital position raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston , Massachusetts
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Note:
The following audit report of Arthur Andersen LLP (Andersen) is a copy of the report previously issued by Arthur Andersen on February 25, 2002 (and on March 8, 2002 with respect to other matters) in connection with StockerYale, Inc.'s filing on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. This audit report has not been reissued by Arthur Andersen LLP in connection with this filing on Form 10-K.
To the Directors and Stockholders of StockerYale, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of StockerYale, Inc. (a Massachusetts corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 . These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States . Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of StockerYale, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
/s/ Arthur Andersen LP
Arthur Andersen LLP
Boston , Massachusetts
February 25, 2002
29 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In thousands (except share data) |
Year Ended December 31 | | 2003 | | 2002 |
Assets | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 1,008 | | $ | 3,070 | |
Restricted cash | | | - | | | 2,000 | |
Accounts receivable, less allowances of approximately $103 in 2003 and $155 in 2002 | | | 2,102 | | | 2,200 | |
Inventories | | | 3,799 | | | 4,478 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 188 | | | 747 | |
Total current assets | | | 7,097 | | | 12,495 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | 20,550 | | | 23,650 | |
Goodwill | | | 2,677 | | | 2,677 | |
Acquired intangible assets, net | | | 1,463 | | | 1,785 | |
Officer note receivable | | | 263 | | | 249 | |
Other long-term assets | | | 639 | | | 464 | |
Total assets | | $ | 32,689 | | $ | 41,320 | |
Liabilities and stockholders' equity | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Current portion of long-term debt, net of unamortized discount of $155 in 2003 and $269 in 2002 | | $ | 3,365 | | $ | 5,306 | |
Short-term debt | | | 5,091 | | | 7,446 | |
Accounts payable | | | 2,061 | | | 2,050 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 943 | | | 1,399 | |
Short-term portion of capital lease obligation | | | 47 | | | 61 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 11,507 | | | 16,262 | |
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations net of unamortized discount of $958 in 2003 | | | 3,934 | | | 96 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 17 | | | - | |
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 19) | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity: | | | | | | | |
Common stock, par value $0.001-shares authorized 100,000,000; Shares issued and outstanding 14,791,123 and 12,771,524 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively | | | 15 | | | 13 | |
Paid-in capital | | | 70,948 | | | 68,637 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 1,340 | | | (266) | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (55,072) | | | (43,422) | |
Total stockholders' equity | | | 17,231 | | | 24,962 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 32,689 | | $ | 41,320 | |
See the notes to consolidated financial statements.
30 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
In thousands, except earnings per share |
Year Ended December 31 | | 2003 | | | 2002 | | | 2001 | |
Revenue | | $ | 14,117 | | | $ | 12,992 | | | $ | 15,581 | |
Cost of sales | | | 11,173 | | | | 11,159 | | | | 11,303 | |
Gross profit | | | 2,944 | | | | 1,833 | | | | 4,278 | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling | | | 2,825 | | | | 3,451 | | | | 4,466 | |
General and administrative | | | 4,560 | | | | 5,513 | | | | 7,825 | |
Amortization | | | 322 | | | | 329 | | | | 678 | |
Research and development | | | 3,664 | | | | 6,203 | | | | 5,465 | |
Asset Impairment | | | 1,905 | | | | 1,570 | | | | - | |
Total operating expenses | | | 13,276 | | | | 17,066 | | | | 18,434 | |
Loss from operations | | | (10,332 | ) | | | (15,233 | ) | | | (14,156 | ) |
Interest and other income (expense) | | | (169) | | | | 142 | | | | 441 | |
Interest expense | | | (1,224 | ) | | | (417 | ) | | | (757 | ) |
Loss from continuing operations before income tax (benefit) | | | (11,725 | ) | | | (15,508 | ) | | | (14,472 | ) |
Income tax (benefit) | | | (75) | | | | - | | | | (801 | ) |
Loss from continuing operations | | | (11,650 | ) | | | (15,508 | ) | | | (13,671 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations | | | - | | | | - | | | | (191 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (11,650 | ) | | $ | (15,508 | ) | | $ | (13,862 | ) |
Basic and diluted loss per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss per share from continuing operations | | $ | (0.85 | ) | | $ | (1.22 | ) | | $ | (1.28 | ) |
Loss per share from discontinued operations | | | - | | | | - | | | | (0.02 | ) |
Net loss per share | | $ | (0.85 | ) | | $ | (1.22 | ) | | $ | (1.30 | ) |
Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | | | 13,707 | | | | 12,685 | | | | 10,683 | |
See the notes to consolidated financial statements.
31 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | | $0.001 Par Value | | Paid-in Capital | | Accumulated (Deficit) | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | Total Stockholders' Equity | | Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Balance, December 31, 2000 | 9,386 | | $ | 9 | | $ | 42,071 | | | $ | (14,052 | ) | | $ | (129 | ) | | $ | 27,899 | | | $ | - | |
| Sale of common stock net of issuance costs of $1.4 million | 1,700 | | $ | 2 | | $ | 15,904 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 15,906 | | | $ | - | |
| Issuance of common stock to employees | 306 | | $ | - | | $ | 334 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 334 | | | $ | - | |
| Cumulative translation adjustment | - | | $ | - | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | (252 | ) | | $ | (252 | ) | | $ | (252 | ) |
| Net loss | - | | $ | - | | $ | - | | | $ | (13,862 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (13,862 | ) | | $ | (13,862 | ) |
| Comprehensive net loss for the year ended December 31, 2001 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (14,114 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2001 | 11,392 | | $ | 11 | | $ | 58,309 | | | $ | (27,914 | ) | | $ | (381 | ) | | $ | 30,025 | | | $ | - | |
| Sale of common stock net of issuance costs of $0.11 million | 1,243 | | | 2 | | | 9,534 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 9,536 | | | | - | |
| Issuance of common stock to employees | 103 | | | - | | | 324 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 324 | | | | - | |
| Issuance of common stock for acquisition of CIENA Group | 34 | | | - | | | 200 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 200 | | | | - | |
| Warrants to purchase common stock | - | | | - | | | 270 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 270 | | | | - | |
| Cumulative translation adjustment | - | | | - | | | - | | | | - | | | | 115 | | | | 115 | | | | 115 | |
| Net loss | - | | | - | | | - | | | | (15,508 | ) | | | - | | | | (15,508 | ) | | | (15,508 | ) |
| Comprehensive net loss for the year ended December 31, 2002 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (15,393 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2002 | 12,772 | | $ | 13 | | $ | 68,637 | | | $ | (43,422 | ) | | $ | (266 | ) | | $ | 24,962 | | | | | |
| Sale of common stock net of issuance costs of $0.08 million | 1,610 | | | 2 | | | 891 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 893 | | | | - | |
| Issuance of common stock to employees | 25 | | | - | | | 24 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 24 | | | | - | |
| Issuance of common stock for StockerYale Ireland shareholders | 319 | | | - | | | 380 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 380 | | | | - | |
| Issuance of common stock for Laurus convertible note | 65 | | | - | | | 69 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 69 | | | | - | |
| Warrants to purchase common stock | | | | | | | 947 | | | | | | | | | | | | 947 | | | | | |
| Cumulative translation adjustment | - | | | - | | | - | | | | | | | | 1,606 | | | | 1,606 | | | | 1,606 | |
| Net loss | | | | | | | | | | | (11,650 | ) | | | | | | | (11,650 | ) | | | (11,650 | ) |
| Comprehensive net loss for the year ended December 31, 2003 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (10,044 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2003 | 14,791 | | $ | 15 | | $ | 70,948 | | | $ | (55,072 | ) | | $ | 1,340 | | | $ | 17,231 | | | | | |
See the notes to consolidated financial statements.
32 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS STATEMENTS
In thousands |
Year Ended December 31 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 |
Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (11,650 | ) | | $ | (15,508 | ) | | $ | (13,862 | ) |
Less: net loss on discontinued operations | | | - | | | | - | | | | (191) | |
| | | (11,650 | ) | | | (15,508 | ) | | | (13,671 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 2,945 | | | | 2,695 | | | | 2,066 | |
Deferred income taxes and other charges | | | - | | | | (9 | ) | | | (696 | ) |
Loss on investment in joint venture | | | - | | | | 317 | | | | 380 | |
Asset impairment | | | 1,905 | | | | 933 | | | | - | |
Other changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 98 | | | | (109 | ) | | | 580 | |
Officer note receivable | | | (14 | ) | | | (249 | ) | | | - | |
Inventories | | | 679 | | | | 746 | | | | (28 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 559 | | | | 337 | | | | (216 | ) |
Accounts payable | | | 11 | | | | (1,741 | ) | | | 2,155 | |
Accrued expenses | | | (456 | ) | | | (178 | ) | | | 106 | |
Other Assets and Liabilities | | | 148 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Net cash used in operations | | | (5,775 | ) | | | (12,766 | ) | | | (9,324 | ) |
Financing | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of common stock | | | 917 | | | | 9,860 | | | | 16,240 | |
Borrowings (repayments) of revolving credit facilities | | | (3,466) | | | | 3,459 | | | | 2,688 | |
Net proceeds from issuance of convertible note | | | 2,344 | | | | (1,195 | ) | | | | - |
Proceeds from long-term debt | | | 3,903 | | | | 4,000 | | | | | - |
Principal repayment of long-term debt | | | (2,210 | ) | | | - | | | | - | |
Restricted cash related to Merrill Lynch | | | 2,000 | | | | - | | | | (1,500 | ) |
Debt acquisition costs | | | (136) | | | | (244 | ) | | | - | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 3,352 | | | | 15,880 | | | | 17,428 | |
Investing | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from asset dispositions | | | 504 | | | | - | | | | | |
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | | | (95 | ) | | | (1,509 | ) | | | (18,912 | ) |
Net investment in joint venture | | | - | | | | (330 | ) | | | (600 | ) |
Net proceeds from sale of discontinued operations | | | - | | | | - | | | | 659 | |
Long-term investment | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Proceeds from note receivable | | | - | | | | 104 | | | | 90 | |
Net cash provided (used for) investing | | | 409 | | | | (1,735 | ) | | | (18,763 | ) |
Effect of exchange rates | | | (48 | ) | | | 115 | | | | (252 | ) |
Net change in cash and equivalents | | | (2,062 | ) | | | 1,494 | | | | (10,911 | ) |
Cash and equivalents, beginning of year | | | 3,070 | | | | 1,576 | | | | 12,487 | |
Cash and equivalents, end of year | | $ | 1,008 | | | $ | 3,070 | | | $ | 1,576 | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest paid | | | 1,105 | | | | 417 | | | | 757 | |
Stock issued in CIENA acquisition | | | - | | | | 225 | | | | - | |
Conversion of BES shares | | | 380 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Conversion of Laurus convertible note | | | 69 | | | | - | | | | - | |
See the notes to consolidated financial statements.
33 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2003
(1) ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
StockerYale, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in 1951, and is primarily engaged in the design, manufacture and distribution of structured light lasers, specialized fiber optic and fluorescent illumination products used in a wide range of markets and industries, including: machine vision, telecommunications, aerospace, defense and security, utilities, industrial inspection and medical markets.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the consolidated financial statements, during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company incurred net losses of $11,650,000, $15,508,000 and $13,862,000 respectively, and, as of December 31, 2003, the Company's current liabilities exceeded its current assets by $4,410,000. These factors among others may indicate that the Company will be unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis, to comply with the terms and covenants of its financing agreements, to obtain additional financing or refinancing as may be required, and ultimately to attain successful operations. Management is continuing its efforts to obtain additional funds so that the Company can meet its obligations and sustain operations from sources that are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
(2) MANAGEMENT PLAN
Three years ago the Company made a strategic decision to utilize its optics and manufacturing expertise in phase masks and fiber optic illumination to expand into specialty optical fiber and optical components. This was based on high growth expectations for the telecommunications infrastructure in order to facilitate the rapid growth in Internet traffic. Given management's expectations of the optical component industry's rapid growth and the communications industry's growing demand for advanced telecommunications equipment, the Company over the following three years invested significant equity capital in plant and equipment, research and development and commercialization expenses.
However, as the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in the telecommunication sector continued to curtail purchases in the first half of 2002, the Company realized that while the telecom equipment market still offered long-term growth potential, near-term revenue opportunities for optical components would be adversely affected. This change in market conditions required the Company to significantly modify its expectations for specialty fiber and component revenue in the foreseeable future.
In 2002, the Company began to significantly reduce its overall cost structure, and most importantly, its investment in research and development expenses related to optical components. The Company ceased funding two joint ventures and reduced its headcount in research and development, as well as selling and general and administration expenses.
As the recession and telecommunications slump continued into 2003, the Company focused its sales and research and development efforts on new laser, LED and related products for the machine vision/illumination sector and reduced manufacturing overhead and operating expenses, resulting in a $4.9 million or 32% reduction in its operating loss from $15.2 million in 2002 to $10.3 million in 2003.
The Company was also successful in raising an additional $4.3 million through debt refinancing, private equity placements a convertible debt note and asset sales. During the first quarter of 2004, the Company raised an additional $6.6 million through a private placement of equity and a convertible note of $2.6 million and $4.0 million, respectively. The net proceeds of approximately $6.1 million were used to retire the $4.4 million term note secured by the Salem headquarters with the remainder for general working capital purposes.
34 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
Based upon the Company's current forecast for 2004, the Company plans to increase revenues, reduce costs and pursue various options to raise additional funds to finance operations through the end of 2004. The Company can give no assurances to the timing or terms of such arrangements, assuming it is able to consummate one or more of these options. If the Company is unable to raise sufficient funds through these options by the end of the second quarter of 2004, it will need to implement further cost reduction strategies, and the Company may not have adequate capital to sustain its current operations. Financing options in process or under consideration are the sale of real estate and/or a private placement of equity/debt securities. The Company expects to close several of these financing options by the end of the second quarter of 2004.
(3) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the application of certain significant accounting policies as described in this note and elsewhere in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries, StockerYale (IRL) Ltd, Lasiris Holdings, Inc., which holds all of the outstanding shares of StockerYale Canada, Innovative Specialty Optical Fiber Components LLC and StockerYale Asia PTE Ltd. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The Company has a 49% ownership interest in Optune Technologies, Inc. that has been accounted for under the equity method.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased.
RESTRICTED CASH
The Company maintained certain levels of restricted cash required as collateral under the original borrowing agreement with Merrill Lynch. The agreement required that $2,000,000 be held in escrow as long as there is an outstanding balance under the agreement. The Company maintained the restricted cash in highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. On September 30, 2003, the credit facility with Merrill Lynch was amended and the $2,000,000 restricted cash was applied to reduce the term note outstanding. As of December 31, 2003, there are no funds in the restricted cash account with Merrill Lynch.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The Company reviews the financial condition of new customers prior to granting credit. After completing the credit review, the Company establishes a credit line for each customer. Periodically, the Company reviews the credit line for major customers and adjusts the credit limit based upon an updated financial condition of the customer, historical sales and payment information and expected future sales. The Company has a large number of customers; therefore, material credit risk is limited.
The Company periodically reviews the collectibility of its accounts receivable. Provisions are established for accounts that are potentially uncollectible. Determining adequate reserves for accounts receivable requires management's judgment. Conditions impacting the collectibility of the Company's receivables could change causing actual write-offs to be materially different than the reserved balances.
35 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
INVENTORY
The Company values inventories at the lower of cost or market using the first in, first-out ("FIFO") method. The Company specifically evaluates historical and forecasted demand of the illumination product line to determine if the carrying value of both finished goods and raw materials is recoverable through future sales. The Company also estimates the impact of increased revenues for new products versus the potential obsolescence of older products on a case-by-case basis. As a result of this analysis, the Company reduces the carrying value amount of the inventory. Actual results could be different from management's estimates and assumptions.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Company's intangible assets consist of goodwill, which ceased being amortized in 2002 and amortizing intangibles, which consist of patents, trademarks and purchased patented technologies, which are being amortized over their useful lives. All intangible assets are subject to impairment tests on a periodic basis.
Note 8 describes the impact of accounting for the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, and the annual impairment methodology that the Company will employ on January 1st of each year in calculating the recoverability of goodwill. This same impairment test will be performed at other times during the course of the year should an event occur which suggests that the recoverability of goodwill should be challenged. Amortizing intangibles are evaluated for impairment using the methodology set forth in SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of. Recoverability of these assets is assessed only when events have occurred that may give rise to an impairment. When a potential impairment has been identified, forecasted undiscounted cash flows of the operations to which the asset relates are compared to the current carrying value of the long-lived assets present in that operation. If such cash flows are less than such carrying amounts, long-lived assets, including such intangibles, are written down to their respective fair values.
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets, primarily property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. This review is based on the Company's ability to recover the carrying value of the assets from expected undiscounted future cash flows. If an impairment is indicated, the Company measures the loss based on the fair value of the asset using various valuation techniques. If an impairment loss exists, the amount of the loss will be recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. It is possible that future events or circumstances could cause these estimates to change.
During the third and fourth quarters of 2003, the Company recorded asset impairment charges of $605,000 and $1,300,000 respectively. The third quarter charge related to the closing of the Company's Maryland specialty optical fiber facility and the write-off of equipment deposits for the optical segment of the business. The fourth quarter charge relates to a reduction in the market value of the Salem headquarter facility.
LOSS PER SHARE
Loss per share, basic and diluted, is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, 3,552,673, 3,202,143, 2,309,274 options and 1,259,957, 269,957, and 19,957 warrants, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted shares, as their effects were anti-dilutive.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company recognizes revenue from product sales at the time of shipment and when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, performance of the Company's obligation is complete, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In certain limited situations, customers have the right to return products. Such rights of return have not precluded revenue recognition because the Company has a long history with such returns and accordingly provides a reserve.
36 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment is valued at the lower of cost or estimated carrying values. The Company provides for depreciation on a straight-line basis over the assets estimated useful lives or lease terms, if shorter. The following table summarizes the estimated useful lives by asset classification:
Asset Classification | Estimated Useful Life |
Building and building improvements | 10 to 40 years |
Computer equipment | 3 to 5 years |
Machinery and equipment | 5 to 10 years |
Furniture and fixtures | 3 to 10 years |
Total depreciation expense of property, plant and equipment was approximately $2.6 million in 2003, $2.4 million in 2002, and $1.4 million in 2001. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.
INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method. Under this method the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax basis of the assets and liabilities using tax rates expected to be in place when the differences reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company accounts for employee stock options and share awards under the intrinsic-value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees , (APB 25), with pro-forma disclosures of net earnings and earnings per share, as if the fair value method of accounting defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation , "SFAS No. 123" was used. SFAS No. 123 establishes a fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. Under the fair value method, compensation cost is measured based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period.
Had the Company determined the stock-based compensation expense for the Company's stock options under the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company's net loss and net loss per share based upon the fair value at the grant date for stock options awards in 2002, 2001, and 2000, would have increased the pro-forma amounts as indicated below:
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
(in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |
Net loss | | | | |
As reported | $ (11,650) | $ (15,508) | $ (13,862) | |
Additional compensation expense | (4,602) | (4,877) | (3,848) | |
Pro forma | $ (16,252) | $ (20,385) | $ (17,710) | |
Net loss per share (basic and diluted) | | | | |
As reported | $ (0.85) | $ (1.22) | $ (1.30) | |
Pro forma | $ (1.19) | $ (1.60) | $ (1.66) | |
37 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
TRANSLATION OF FOREIGN CURRENCIES
The balance sheet accounts of non-U.S. operations, exclusive of stockholders' equity, are translated at year-end exchange rates, and income statement accounts are translated at weighted-average rates in effect during the year; any translation adjustments related to the balance sheet accounts are recorded as a component of stockholders' equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recorded in the statements of operations and have not been material.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as net income plus the change in the net assets of a business enterprise during a period from transactions generated from non-owner sources. It includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in the accompanying balance sheets consists of foreign currency translation adjustments.
FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company's financial instruments consist mainly of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, short-term debt, accounts payable and long-term debt. The estimated fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying value due to the short term maturity of certain instruments and the variable interest rates associated with certain instruments which have the effect of repricing such instruments regularly.
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of trade receivables. The risk is limited due to the relatively large number of customers composing the Company's customer base and their dispersion across many industries and geographic areas within the United States , Europe and Asia . The Company also insures approximately 90% of export receivables from its Canadian subsidiary and performs ongoing credit evaluations of existing customers' financial condition. No customer accounted for more than 10% of sales in 2003. One customer accounted for 16% of sales in 2002 and no other customer accounted for more than 10% of sales in 2002 and 2001.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results in the future could vary from the amounts derived from management's estimates and assumptions.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." This statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity instruments. Implementation of this statement had no material effect on the company's financial statements.
38 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
In January 2003 and December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation for Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46) and its revision, FIN 46-R, respectively. FIN 46 and FIN 46-R address the consolidation of entities whose equity holders have either not provided sufficient equity at risk to allow the entity to finance its own activities or do not possess certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. FIN 46 and FIN 46-R require the consolidation of these entities, known as variable interest entities (VIEs), by the primary beneficiary of the entity. The primary beneficiary is the entity, if any, that is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the VIE's activities, entitled to receive a majority of the VIE's residual returns, or both. FIN 46 and FIN 46-R are applicable for financial statements of public entities that have interests in VIEs or potential VIEs referred to as special purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003, of which the Company had none. Application by public entities for all other types of entities is required in financial statements for periods ending after March 15, 2004. Adoption of FIN 46-R is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
RECLASSIFICATION
Certain amounts reported for prior periods have been reclassified to be consistent with the current period presentation.
(4) INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market and include materials, labor and overhead. Inventories are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
(in thousands) | | 2003 | | 2002 |
Finished goods | | $ | 616 | | | $ | 1,028 | |
Work in-process | | | 78 | | | | 101 | |
Raw materials | | | 4,479 | | | | 4,584 | |
Reserve for obsolescence | | | (1,374 | ) | | | (1,235 | ) |
Net inventories | | $ | 3,799 | | | $ | 4,478 | |
Management performs quarterly reviews of inventory and disposes of items not required by their manufacturing plan and reduces the carrying cost of inventory to the lower of cost or market. The Company recorded a charge of $0.7 million in 2003 and $0.4 million in 2002.
(5) OFFICER NOTE RECEIVABLE
On May 31, 2002, Mark W. Blodgett, the chairman and chief executive officer of the Company, issued a promissory note to the Company in the principal amount of $250,000. The note is a full recourse note and is payable upon demand with interest on the unpaid principal accruing at a rate per annum equal to 4.5%. As of December 31, 2003 has received $5,000 in payments and the principal and accrued interest outstanding is $248,750 and $14,000 respectively. The Board of Directors of the Company approved this loan transaction. The Company is not contemplating that its demand rights will be exercised during 2004. Accordingly, the Note has been classified as long-term in the accompanying 2003 Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(6) NOTE RECEIVABLE
On September 19, 2001 , the Company sold its machine components and accessories division for $850,000 in cash and a note receivable of $250,000 from the buyer. The note requiress payment of interest at a rate of 6.25% only for the first six months with interest and principal payable over the following twelve months. The balance due as of December 31, 2003 is $53,334.
39 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
(7) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Major classes of property, plant and equipment were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
(in thousands) | | 2003 | | 2002 |
Land | | $ | 759 | | | $ | 962 | |
Buildings and improvements | | | 11,206 | | | | 11,801 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 15,294 | | | | 15,125 | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 1,709 | | | | 1,557 | |
| | | 28,968 | | | | 29,445 | |
Less: Accumulated depreciation | | | 8,418 | | | | 5,795 | |
| | $ | 20,550 | | | $ | 23,650 | |
(8) GOODWILL
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and other Intangible Assets . SFAS No. 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for goodwill and other intangible assets acquired individually or with a group of other assets at acquisition. The statement also addresses financial accounting and reporting for goodwill and other intangibles subsequent to their acquisition. SFAS No. 142 supercedes APB Opinion No. 17, Intangible Assets. Under SFAS No. 142, the amortization of goodwill ceased beginning January 1, 2002 and the the Company assesses the realizability of this asset annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate they might be impaired. The Company estimates the fair value of its reporting units by using forecasts of discounted cash flows. In applying SFAS No. 142, the Company performed the transitional assessment and impairment test required and determined that there was no impairment of goodwill. The Company completed another test for impairment in the fourth quarter of 2003 and determined that goodwill was not impaired. At December 31, 2003 , the carrying value of goodwill was approximately $2.7 million.
The transitional disclosure for reported loss for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 as adjusted is presented in the table below:
| | | | |
| | 2001 |
Net loss as reported | | $ | (13,862 | ) |
Add back amortization of goodwill, net of tax | | | 326 | |
Adjusted net loss | | $ | (13,536 | ) |
| | | | |
Loss per share, basic and diluted: | | | | |
Net loss as reported | | $ | (1.30 | ) |
Add back amortization of goodwill, net of tax | | | 0.03 | |
Adjusted net loss per share | | $ | (1.27 | ) |
40 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
(9) INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consist of acquired patented technology and trademarks. Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives which range from two to five years. The Company has no intangible assets with indefinite lives. The Company reviews intangible assets when indications of potential impairment exists, such as a significant reduction in cash flows associated with the assets. Intangible assets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 are as follows:
| | December 31, |
(in thousands) | | 2003 | | 2002 |
Acquired patented technology | | $ | 3,078 | | | $ | 3,078 | |
Trademarks | | | 471 | | | | 471 | |
Less: accumulated amortization | | | 2,086 | | | | 1,764 | |
| | $ | 1,463 | | | $ | 1,785 | |
Amortization of intangible assets was $322,000, $329,000 and $358,000, respectively in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001.
The estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets, in thousands, is as follows:
2004 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2008 and thereafter |
$ | 318 | | | $ | 318 | | | $ | 318 | | | $ | 319 | | | $ | 190 | |
(10) ACQUISITIONS
CIENA Acquisition
On May 13, 2002, the Company announced the acquisition of CIENA Corporation's specialty optical fiber (SOF) assets. StockerYale entered into the transaction to take advantage of distressed prices for capital assets, to expand its current product line of specialty optical fibers and become an independent supplier to a major OEM in the telecommunications sector. The acquisition included CIENA's specialty fiber manufacturing equipment and related test and measurement assets, intellectual property related to CIENA's specialty optical fiber technology, a fully developed SOF product line, and a three-year primary supply agreement between CIENA and the Company. The purchase price of $575,000 included $350,000 of cash and 33,613 shares of common stock with an approximate market value of $225,000 of stock which has been allocated to the fiber manufacturing equipment and the related test measurement assets. The Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $266,000 in the third quarter of 2003 related to this asset purchase, which was the result of the Company's decision to not utilize the equipment. The impairment was calculated based upon current market values.
(11) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
During 2000, the Company decided to discontinue its machine components and accessories division ("Stilson Die-Draulic"). On March 6, 2001, the Company signed a letter of intent to sell the net assets of the division for $1.1 million. Accordingly, the Company reported the results of the operations of the machine tool and accessories division and the associated impairment charges as discontinued operations. The net loss from discontinued operations was $1.9 million in fiscal 2000 which includes a $1.2 million charge for impairment, principally related to goodwill and net assets of $0.7 million of $0.4 million, respectively. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the loss from discontinued operations. In September 2001, the Company completed the sale of Stilson Die-Draulic for $1.1 million, which resulted in an additional loss of $191,000, which has been recorded in the accompanying 2001 statement of operations.
41 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
Certain information with respect to discontinued operations is summarized as follows:
| | | |
(in thousands) | Year Ended December 31, 2001 |
|
Statement of Operations: | | | |
Net sales | $ | 1,453 | |
Cost of sales | | 1,284 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 177 | |
Other expense (income) | | (8 | ) |
Cost and expenses | | 1,453 | |
Loss from discontinued operations | | - | |
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations | | (191 | ) |
Net loss from discontinued operations | $ | (191 | ) |
(12) TAXES
The components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | For the Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 |
Current | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
State | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Foreign | | | - | | | | 263 | | | | (186 | ) |
| | | - | | | | 263 | | | | (186 | ) |
Deferred | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
State | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Foreign | | | (75 | ) | | | (263 | ) | | | (615 | ) |
Total | | $ | (75 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (801 | ) |
The following is a reconciliation of the federal income tax (benefit) provision calculated at the statutory rate of 34% to the recorded amount:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | For the Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2003 | | | | 2002 | | | | 2001 | |
Applicable statutory federal income tax benefit | | $ | (3,987 | ) | | $ | (5,273 | ) | | $ | (4,923 | ) |
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit | | | (648 | ) | | | (857 | ) | | | (629 | ) |
Non-deductible amortization and impairment charge | | | - | | | | 177 | | | | 64 | |
Foreign tax rate differential | | | - | | | | 154 | | | | 239 | |
Other, net | | | - | | | | 338 | | | | (19 | ) |
Valuation allowance | | | 4,560 | | | | 5,461 | | | | 4,467 | |
Net federal income tax (benefit) | | $ | (75 | ) | | $ | 0 | | | $ | (801 | ) |
42 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8The significant items comprising the deferred tax asset and liability at December 31, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
in thousands) | | For the Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2003 | | | | 2002 | |
Net operating loss carry forwards | | $ | 15,975 | | | $ | 11,978 | |
Other | | | 306 | | | | (257 | ) |
Valuation allowance | | | (16,281 | ) | | | (11,721 | ) |
| | $ | - | | | $ | | - |
As of December 31, 2003, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards (NOLs) of approximately $39.9 million available to offset future taxable income, if any. These carry forwards expire through 2023 and are subject to review and possible adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company's historical operating losses raise doubt as to the realizability of the deferred tax assets. As a result, management has provided a valuation allowance for the net deferred tax assets that may not be realized. The increase in the valuation allowance during 2003 and 2002 is principally the result of the Company's net loss.
The tax benefits recorded in 2003 and 2001 relates primarily to net operating losses and research and development tax credits being benefited in the Canadian tax jurisdiction. In accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, the deferred tax assets were recognized up to the amount offsetting deferred tax liabilities in the applicable tax jurisdiction.
43 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8(13) DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
As of December 31, 2002 the Company had classified certain debt and capital lease obligations as current due to violation of provisions within the underlying debt agreements. Debt and capital lease obligations consisted of the following:
| | | | |
| December 31, |
(in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 |
Borrowings under Credit Agreement with Merrill Lynch (1) | $ 3,428 | | $ 6,387 | |
Borrowings under Line of Credit Agreement with Toronto Dominion Bank (1) | - | | 877 | |
Borrowings under Term Loans with Toronto Dominion Bank | - | | 374 | |
Borrowings under Line of Credit Agreement with National Bank of Canada (1) | 1,393 | | - | |
Note Payable to TJJ Corporation maturing on December 28, 2005 , with an interest rate of 8.50%, net of unamortized discount of $155 as of December 31, 2003 | 4,544 | | 3,731 | |
Convertible Note Payable to Laurus Master Funds, LTD maturing on September 26, 2006 , with an interest rate of 7.50%, net of unamortized discount of $802 as of December 31, 2003 | 1,628 | | - | |
Borrowings under equipment line of credit | - | | 85 | |
Mortgage notes payable to Toronto Dominion bank, maturing December 2015 and July 2016, with an interest rate of bank's prime plus 0.875%. | - | | 1,181 | |
Mortgage note payable to National Bank of Canada , maturing June 2008 with an interest rate of bank's prime plus 2.25%. | 1,110 | | - | |
Term loan with the Bank of Ireland, maturing on December 31, 2003 , with an interest rate of 6.5% | - | | 2 | |
Revolving line of credit, maturing on demand, payable to the Bank of Ireland, with interest rate of 9.45% | - | | 33 | |
Revolving line of credit, maturing on demand, payable to a Singapore bank, with interest of prime plus 2% (1) | - | | 149 | |
Marshall Wace, debt convertible into common stock May 2004 | 270 | | - | |
Machinery & equipment capital lease obligations, maturing April 8, 2005 | 64 | | 90 | |
Sub-total debt and capital lease obligations | 12,437 | | 12,909 | |
Less -- Short-term (1) | (5,091 | ) | (7,446 | ) |
-- Short-term portion of capital lease obligations | (47 | ) | (61 | ) |
-- Current portion of long-term debt | (3,365 | ) | (5,306 | ) |
Total long-term debt and capital leases | $ 3,934 | | $ 96 | |
BORROWING AGREEMENTS
Debt Compliance
The Company has various debt covenants under its multiple credit facilities. As of December 31, 2003, the Company was in compliance with or has obtained waivers or amendments for all debt covenants.
As of December 31, 2003, the Company was not in compliance with the stockholders equity and inventory covenants with the National Bank of Canada.
As of December 31, 2003, the company was in compliance with the additional debt and excess private placement proceeds covenants with Merrill Lynch. However, as a result of the private placement of equity and the Convertible Note discussed in footnote 22 of the financial statements, the Company was not in compliance with the Merrill Lynch covenants during the first quarter of 2004.
44 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
The Company subsequently received waivers and/or amendments for both credit agreements, which brought the Company into compliance as of December 31, 2003. The waivers and/or amendments are described in the following section under Borrowing Agreements.
Merrill Lynch Financial Services
On September 30, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to modify the terms of its credit facility with Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services. The new agreement provides a credit facility of $3,450,000 through a term note of $2,450,000 and a line of credit of $1,000,000. The new facility matures on October 31, 2004 and bears an interest rate of one month libor + 5.5% and is partially guaranteed (maximum $1,000,000) by an officer of the Company. On December 31, 2003 the interest rate was approximately 6.5%. Outstanding borrowings as of December 31, 2003 were $3,428,162
The Company's obligations under the credit facility are secured by substantially all the Company's Salem assets, excluding real property. The facility is also subject to various financial covenants, including having a minimum net worth of $10.0 million at all times. The Company is also required to repay amounts under the credit facility using 100% of the net excess proceeds from the sale of its Salem facility; 80% of net proceeds from assets sales and 50% of the net proceeds from equity offerings.
On March 25, 2004, the Company entered into an amended agreement with Merrill Lynch. The amended agreement changes the maturity date from October 31, 2004 in the prior agreement to June 30, 2004 in the March 25, 2004 agreement. The amended agreement also increased the interest from LIBOR + 5.5% in the prior agreement to LIBOR + 7.5% in the March 25, 2004 agreement. All other provisions of the September 30, 2003 agreement remained the same.
Laurus Master Funds
On September 24, 2003, the Company sold a Convertible Note to Laurus Master Funds, LTD. The $2,500,000 Convertible Note matures on September 24, 2006, bears interest at a rate equal to the Prime Rate plus 3. 5%, but in no event less than 7.5%, and provides the holder with the option to convert the loan to common stock at $1.07 per share subject to certain adjustment features. StockerYale has the right to elect to make the monthly required payments on the convertible note (comprised of principal amortization and interest) in the form of shares of common stock, determined based on the $1.07 conversion price. The Company also issued to the holder seven-year warrants to purchase shares in the following warrant amounts and exercise prices per share of common stock: 225,000 shares at $1.23 per share, 150,000 shares at $1.34 per share and 100,000 shares at $1.44 per share. The aggregate purchase price of the convertible note and warrants ($2,500,000) was allocated between the note, the common stock conversion option and warrants based upon their relative fair market value. The purchase price assigned to the note, common stock beneficial conversion option and warrants was $1,551,700, $546,650 and $401,650 respectively. The difference between the face amount of the convertible note of $2.5 million and the aggregate purchase price of the convertible note of $1,551,700 was recorded as a debt discount and is being amortized over the life of the convertible note. The Company used the Black-Scholes Model to calculate the fair value of the warrants. The underlying assumptions included in the Black-Scholes Model were: a risk-free interest rate of 2.7%; an expected life of five years; and an expected volatility of 114% with no dividend yield.
The Company can elect to pay monthly principal amortization in cash at 103% of the principal amount. The Company may also elect to pay both principal amortization and interest in common stock, if the market price of the stock at the time of the payment is 110% of the fixed conversion price. The Company may elect to redeem the principal amount outstanding at 120% within the first year, 115% within the second year and 110% during the third year. The principal amortization payments begin 120 days from the execution of the agreement at a rate of $78,125 per month. As of December 31, 2003, $2,430,450 was outstanding under the Convertible Note of which $937,500 has been classified as short-term debt and $1,492,950 has been classified as long-term debt. The obligation has been reported net of $802,000 related to debt discount on warrants.
45 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
Bank of Ireland
On September 24, 2003 , StockerYale, Inc. entered into a guarantee of a Euros125,000 in connection with a credit facility provided by the Bank of Ireland to StockerYale Ireland . The credit facility provides a Euro 50,000 line of credit and a Euro 75,000 overdraft facility. The credit facility is secured by the assets of StockerYale Ireland and StockerYale, Inc.'s guarantee and bears a variable interest rate approximating 9.0%. As of December 31, 2003 , there were no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility.
TJJ Corporation
On December 27, 2002, the Company entered into a Term Note agreement with TJJ Corporation. The Term Note was a $5,000,000 three-year note due December 26, 2005, secured by the Company's Salem headquarters and bears an interest rate of 8.5%. The Company also issued warrants to purchase shares of the Company's common stock. The warrants can be exercised over a five-year period and each warrant can be exchanged for one share of common stock at a purchase price of $1.35 per share. The aggregate purchase price of the Term Note and the warrants of $5,000,000 was allocated between the Term Note and warrants based upon their relative fair market values. The purchase price assigned to the Term Note and warrants was $4,730,825 and $269,175, respectively. The difference between the face amount of the Term Note and the aggregate purchase price allocated to the Term Note of $4,730,825 was recorded as a debt discount, and is being amortized over the life of the Term Note.
On September 18, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with TJJ Corporation amending the $5,000,000 Term Note maturing in December 26, 2005. The new agreement resulted in loan amortization commencing in October 2003 and a reduction in the stockholders' equity covenant from $22,000,000 to $20,000,000. The new principal amortization beginning in October 2003 was $100,000 per month for three months, $150,000 for the next three months and $200,000 per month for the following eleven months. As of December 31, 2003, $4,700,000, excluding debt discount of $155,833, was outstanding under the Term Note. On of February 25, 2004, the Company paid the note in full including outstanding principal and accrued interest of $4,400,000 and $25,000, respectively, with proceeds from a private placement of equity and convertible note discussed in footnote 22 of the financial statements.
National Bank of Canada
On May 26, 2003, the Company entered into a credit agreement with the National Bank of Canada replacing the facility with Toronto Dominion Bank. The new agreement provided total borrowing availability up to C$4,050,000 ($3,000,000 US), including a line of credit of C$2,500,000 ($1,850,000 US) and a ten-year term note of C$1,550,000 ($1,150,000 US). Initial proceeds were used to pay off the credit agreement with Toronto Dominion Bank.
On August 23, 2003, the Company amended its credit facility with National Bank of Canada to reduce the restricted term deposit from C$1,000,000 ($740,000 US) to C$250,000 ($185,000 US) and reduce the term loan from C$2,300,000 ($1,702,000 US) to C$1,550,000 ($1,147,000 US) . The net availability of the term loan remained the same. In addition, the bank added Canadian Provincial Government research and development tax credits as additional eligible accounts receivable, which increased the availability of the revolving credit facility by approximately C$300,000 ($222,000 US). All other terms of the credit facility remained the same, including StockerYale, Inc.'s guarantee to fund StockerYale Canada's deficits if requested by the bank.
On November 20, 2003, the credit facility was amended increasing the interest rate on the line of credit to the Canadian prime rate plus 2.00% and the term note to the Canadian prime rate plus 2.75%.
As of December 31, 2003, C$1,801,000 ($1,393,000 US) was outstanding under the line of credit and C$1,435,000 ($1,110,000 US) was outstanding under the term note. As of December 31, 2003, the interest rate on the line of credit and the term note were 7.00% and 7.75%, respectively. Annual principal payments are C$236,000 ($168,000 US).
The National Bank of Canada credit facility requires the following financial covenants, including working capital, net worth, capital expenditures, a financial coverage ratio and maximum inventory levels.
46 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8
On March 19, 2004, the Company entered into an amended agreement with the National Bank of Canada. The new agreement includes a line of credit of C$2,500,000 ($1,875,000 US) and a five-year term note of C$1,396,000 ($1,050,000 US). The amended agreement reduced the net worth covenant from C$10,800,000 in the May 26, 2003 agreement to C$8,000,000 in the March 19, 2004 agreement as of December 31, 2003. The amended agreement also requires a C$10,000,000 net worth as of September 30, 2004 and thereafter. The amended agreement also reduced the reduced the inventory component of the line of credit availability from C$750,000 to C$625,000 and requires the Company to achieve specific net profit targets throughout 2004.
Scheduled future maturities of debt and capital lease obligations for the next five years.
| | | |
Year Ending December 31, | | (in thousands) | |
2004 | $ | 8,503 | |
2005 | | 3,686 | |
2006 | | 783 | |
2007 | | 229 | |
2008 | | 194 | |
| $ | 13,395 | |
(14) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
On May 31, 2001 , the Company completed a private placement of 1,700,000 shares of its common stock, par value $.001 per share. The Company offered these shares to eighteen purchasers at $10.25 per share. The Company did not engage any underwriters in connection with the private placement, but the Company did enter into an agreement with William Blair & Company to act as exclusive placement agent for the shares. The Company paid a commission of $1,219,750 to William Blair & Company. The private placement resulted in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $16 million. Proceeds were used for facility expansion, capital expenditures and working capital.
On March 8, 2002 , the Company completed a private placement of 1,242,600 common shares at a price of $7.76 per share, which resulted in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $9.7 million. The Company did not engage any underwriters in connection with the private placement.
On June 23, 2003 the Company completed a private placement of 1,610,000 common shares at a price of $ 0.60 per share and $270,000 of notes which resulted in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $1.2 million. The notes are convertible into common stock at $0.60 per share. The Company did not engage any underwriters in connection with the private placement.
As of December 31, 2003, there were 3,557,814 shares reserved for stock options and 1,259,957 shares reserved for warrants.
As of December 31, 2003, there were 19,957 warrants outstanding at a price of $22.50 per share, which expire in 2004; 250,000 warrants outstanding at a price of $1.35 per share, which expire in 2007; 475,000 warrants outstanding at $1.31 per share, which expire in 2010; and 515,000 warrants outstanding at $1.20 per share, which expire in 2006.
In connection with the acquisition of CorkOpt, Ltd. in 2000, the Company assumed the obligation to repay BES shareholders their investment in CorkOpt, Ltd. In 2003. The BES shareholders agreed to convert their outstanding investment into Stockeryale common shares. On November 12, 2003, the BES shareholders converted their StockerYale Ireland 265,500 shares into 319,580 StockerYale, Inc. shares.
47 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
Part II
Item 8(15) STOCK OPTION PLANS
In March 1996, the Company adopted the 1996 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the 1996 Option Plan) for the purpose of issuing both Incentive Options and Nonqualified Options to officers, employees and directors of the Company. A total of 1,200,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under this plan.
Options may be granted under the Option Plan on such terms and at such prices as determined by the Board of Directors, except that the options cannot be granted at less than 100%, or in certain circumstances not less than 110%, of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. Each option will be exercisable after the period or periods specified in the option agreement, but no option may be exercised after the expiration of 10 years from the date of grant.
In May 2000, the Company adopted the 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the 2000 Option Plan) for the purpose of issuing both Incentive Options and Nonqualified Options to officers, employees and directors of the Company. A total of 2,800,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under this plan. Options may be granted under the Option Plan on such terms and at such prices as determined by the Board of Directors, except that the options cannot be granted at less than 100%, or in certain circumstances not less than 110%, of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. Each option will be exercisable after the period or periods specified in the option agreement, but no option may be exercised after the expiration of 10 years from the date of grant.
48 / STKR / | | 2003 Form 10-K |
The following is a summary of the activity for the Company's stock options: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Weighted |
| | Number | | | | Average Exercise |
| | of shares | | Price Range | | Price |
Outstanding at December 31, 2000 | 1,395,900 | | | $ | 0.66 | - | $ | 38.00 | | $ | 4.75 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Granted | 1,273,010 | | | $ | 6.60 | - | $ | 18.13 | | $ | 11.59 |
| Forfeited/cancelled | (68,450 | ) | | $ | 0.84 | - | $ | 32.38 | | $ | 7.67 |
| Exercised | (291,186 | ) | | $ | 0.66 | - | $ | 0.88 | | $ | 0.78 |
Outstanding at December 31, 2001 | 2,309,274 | | | $ | 0.69 | - | $ | 38.00 | | $ | 8.92 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable at December 31, 2001 | 559,464 | | | $ | 0.69 | - | $ | 38.00 | | $ | 2.03 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Granted | 1,356,147 | | | $ | 0.73 | - | $ | 11.06 | | $ | 4.67 |
| Forfeited/cancelled | (385,878 | ) | | $ | 3.78 | - | $ | 28.88 | | $ | 11.38 |
| Exercised | (75,400 | ) | | $ | 0.75 | - | $ | 3.78 | | $ | 2.88 |
Outstanding at December 31, 2002 | 3,204,143 | | | $ | 0.69 | - | $ | 38.00 | | $ | 6.95 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable at December 31, 2002 | 1,183,617 | | | $ | 0.69 | - | $ | 38.00 | | $ | 6.31 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Granted | 631,300 | | | $ | 0.52 | - | $ | 1.30 | | $ | 0.76 |
| Forfeited/cancelled | (276,320 | ) | | $ | 0.63 | - | $ | 15.75 | | $ | 7.00 |
| Exercised | (6,450 | ) | | $ | 0.73 | - | $ | 0.81 | | $ | 0.78 |
Outstanding at December 31, 2003 | 3,552,673 | | | $ | 0.52 | - | $ | 38.00 | | $ | 5.86 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable at December 31, 2003 | 1,714,583 | | | $ | 0.69 | - | $ | 38.00 | | $ | 6.86 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Options Outstanding | | Options Exercisable |
Range of Exercise Prices | | Number Outstanding at December 31, 2003 | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years) | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Number Exercisable at December 31, 2003 | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
| $ | 0.00 | - | $ | 3.80 | | | 1,703,664 | | | | 7.5 | | | $ | 1.22 | | | | 813,489 | | | $ | 1.68 | |
| $ | 3.80 | - | $ | 7.60 | | | 747,065 | | | | 7.9 | | | $ | 6.11 | | | | 231,175 | | | $ | 6.20 | |
| $ | 7.60 | - | $ | 11.40 | | | 33,499 | | | | 3.8 | | | $ | 9.75 | | | | 24,374 | | | $ | 9.68 | |
| $ | 11.40 | - | $ | 15.20 | | | 941,295 | | | | 6.7 | | | $ | 12.12 | | | | 527,245 | | | $ | 12.23 | |
| $ | 15.20 | - | $ | 19.00 | | | 63,875 | | | | 2.8 | | | $ | 16.65 | | | | 59,125 | | | $ | 16.62 | |
| $ | 19.00 | - | $ | 22.80 | | | 47,875 | | | | 3.6 | | | $ | 20.27 | | | | 47,875 | | | $ | 20.27 | |
| $ | 22.80 | - | $ | 26.60 | | | 12,000 | | | | 6.6 | | | $ | 24.96 | | | | 11,000 | | | $ | 24.95 | |
| $ | 26.60 | - | $ | 34.20 | | | 3,200 | | | | 0.4 | | | $ | 28.75 | | | | 3,150 | | | $ | 28.78 | |
| $ | 34.20 | - | $ | 38.00 | | | 200 | | | | 6.8 | | | $ | 38.00 | | | | 150 | | | $ | 38.00 | |
| | | | | | | | 3,552,673 | | | | 7.2 | | | $ | 5.86 | | | | 1,714,583 | | | $ | 6.86 | |
The Company had 74,291 and 431,371 shares available for grant as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
During 2003 and 2002, the weighted average fair value of options granted was $0.76 and $4.67 respectively.
The Company elected to account for its stock-based compensation plan under APB 25. However, the Company has computed, for pro forma disclosure purposes, the value of all options granted during 2002, 2001 and 2000 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as prescribed by SFAS No. 123, using the following weighted-average:
The total value of options granted during 2003, 2002, and 2001 would be amortized on a pro forma basis over the vesting period of the options. Options generally vest equally over two or four years.
In May 2000, the Company adopted the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Stock Purchase Plan"), which permits the eligible employees of the Company and its subsidiaries to purchase shares of the Company's common stock, at a discount, through regular monthly payroll deductions of up to 10% of their pre-tax gross salary. Subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends and similar events, a maximum of 100,000 shares of common stock may be issued under the Stock Purchase Plan. For the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, there were 18,573 and 28,086 shares issued respectively under the Stock Purchase Plan.
On January 17, 1994, the Company established the StockerYale 401(k) Plan (the Plan). Under the Plan, employees are allowed to make pretax retirement contributions. In addition, the Company may make matching contributions, not to exceed 100% of the employee contributions, and profit sharing contributions at its discretion. The Company made matching contributions of $35,000, $62,000, and $57,000 in fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. The Company incurred costs of approximately $2,000, $2,000, and $12,000 in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively, to administer the Plan.
The Company leases facilities and equipment under operating leases. The future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2003 are as follows (in thousands):
Total rent expense for operating leases charged to operations was $308,000 $256,000 and $207,000 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-65714, 333-39082, 333-39080, 333-60717, and 333-14757 of StockerYale, Inc on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-109790, 333-109789, 333-83762, 333-67434, 333-50408, 333-39078 and 333-60721 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 29, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements and supplemental schedules listed in Item 15a(2) of StockerYale, Inc. as of and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphs relating to i) substantial doubt with respect to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, and ii) the change in 2002 in the method of accounting for goodwill and intangible assets and ii) the application of procedures relating to certain disclosures of financial statement amounts related to the 2001 consolidated financial statements that were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and for which we have expressed no opinion or other form of assurance other than with respect to such disclosures) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of StockerYale, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Disbursements and payments shall be made to or collected in equal multiples of $250,000.
The term of this loan expired June 26th 2008.
The MasterCard BusinessCard shall be issued for business development purposes.
The occurrence of one or more of the following events shall constitute a default under this Offer:
For the purposes hereof, the terms and expressions hereinafter listed shall be defined as follows:
The Borrower undertakes to pay the Bank the charges below, as determined by the Bank:
Non-refundable fees of $25,000 shall be payable upon acceptance of this Offer.
This Offer shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Quebec.
We trust that our financial support will contribute to the success of your company.
We declare that we have read clause ________ of this Offer of financing and we accept the terms and conditions.
StockerYale, Inc.
This Letter Agreement will serve to confirm certain agreements of Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services Inc. ("MLBFS") and Stockeryale, Inc. ("Customer") with respect to: (i) that certain WCMA LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT NO. 794-07F01 between MLBFS and Customer (including any previous amendments and extensions thereof) , (ii) that certain TERM LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT between MLBFS and Customer dated as of October 21, 2003, (iii) that certain COLLATERAL INSTALLMENT NOTE between MLBFS and Customer dated as of October 21, 2003, and (iv) that certain UNCONDITIONAL GUARANTY dated as of October 21, 2003 from Mark W. Blodgett and (v) all other agreements between MLBFS and Customer or any party who has guaranteed or provided collateral for Customer's obligations to MLBFS (a
"Guarantor") in connection therewith (collectively, the "Loan Documents"). Capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Loan Documents.
Subject to the terms hereof, effective as of the "Effective Date" (as defined below), the Loan Documents are hereby amended as follows:
(c) "Covenant Waiver Fee" shall mean the fee charged in conjunction with this waiver and amendment. The covenant waiver fee shall be $10,000.00. Customer hereby authorizes and directs MLBFS to charge said amount to WCMA Account No. 794-07F01 on or at any time after the Effective Date.
1. On October 21, 2003, MLBFS entered into an amendment and extension of the Loan Documents with the Customer and Guarantor secured by, among other things, substantially all of the assets of Customer and Guarantor.
2. On October 21, 2003, the Loan Documents Amendment and Extension, together with the Term Loan and Security Agreement, require certain Other Covenants. Among the Other Covenants are certain
terms and conditions that require the Negative Pledge of the property commonly known as 32 Hampshire Road, Salem, NH 03079. Additionally, Other Covenants include certain restrictions and requirements regarding the Application of Proceeds. Finally, there is an additional Other Covenant, No Additional Debt, that restricts borrowings of the Customer without the consent of MLBFS.
3. The Negative Pledge covenant requires that except upon the prior written consent of MLBFS, Customer shall not directly or indirectly cause or permit the assignment, transfer, mortgage, encumbrance or pledge to anyone other than MLBFS of, or the granting of a lien or security interest to anyone other than MLBFS on, any of its assets or property, including the real estate commonly known as 32 Hampshire Road, Salem, NH 03079, whether now owned or existing or hereafter acquired or arising.
4. The Application of Proceeds covenant requires that 50% of the Net Proceeds from Equity Offerings related to the Private Placement of Equity shall be applied first as a permanent debt payment to the Term Loan and then as a permanent debt payment to the Line of Credit.
5. The No Additional Debt covenant requires that except upon the prior written consent of MLBFS, Customer shall not directly or indirectly incur or permit to exist any debt of Customer for borrowed money or the lease under a capital lease or deferred purchase price of real or personal property other than: (i) debt to MLBFS, and (ii) debt existing as of the date of and reflected on the last financial statements of Customer submitted to MLBFS prior to the date hereof and not refinanced by MLBFS.
6. On or about February 26, 2004, MLBFS discovered, without prior notice from Customer, that Customer completed a $6.6 million financing package ("2004 Financing Package"). The 2004 Financing Package consisted of $4 million in convertible notes and $2.6 million of common stock. MLBFS also discovered that the proceeds were used to refinance the mortgage on its Salem, NH property.
7. In March 2004, MLBFS had conversations with the Customer and Guarantor regarding the 2004 Financing Package, the Negative Pledge, the Applications of Proceeds, and the No Additional Debt covenants. During these conversations, Customer requested that MLBFS: (i) forbear from any actions that it is entitled under the Loan Documents with respect to the 2004 Financing Package, the Negative Pledge, the Application of Proceeds, and the No Additional Debt covenants, (ii) provide a waiver of any events of default that may have resulted from the 2004 Financing Package and (ii) permit Customer to fully repay the Obligations over time a short period of time that will enable MLBFS to be paid in full and exit the transactions contemplated by the Loan Documents on or before May 31, 2004 or such later date shall elect in its sole discretion on written notice to Obligors (the "Pay-Off Date").
8. Although MLBFS is under no obligation to do so, MLBFS is willing, on the terms and subject to the conditions contained in this letter agreement, to waive the events of default that may have arisen due to the 2004 Financing Package, and are continuing under the Loan Documents, as set forth in Schedule 1 hereto (collectively, "Existing Defaults"); and to continue to defer the full and immediate collection of all amounts that are outstanding under the Loan Documents until the earlier of the Maturity Date or Pay-Off Date. With respect to covenant compliance, MLBFS consents to waive the Existing Defaults for the periods ending 12/31/03 and 3/31/04 only. MLBFS requires strict compliance of these and all other covenants that pertain to the Loan Agreement between MLBFS and Customer at all times thereafter.
Except as expressly amended hereby, the Loan Documents shall continue in full force and effect upon all of their terms and conditions.
By his execution of this Letter Agreement, the below-named Guarantor hereby consents to the foregoing modifications to the Loan Documents, and hereby agrees that the "Obligations" under his Unconditional Guaranty and/or agreements providing collateral shall extend to and include the Obligations of Customer under the Loan Documents, as amended hereby.
Customer and said Guarantor acknowledge, warrant and agree, as a primary inducement to MLBFS to enter into this Agreement, that: (a) no Default or Event of Default, other that the Existing Defaults, have occurred and is continuing under the Loan Documents; (b) each of the warranties of Customer in the Loan Documents are true and correct as of the date hereof and shall be deemed remade as of the date hereof; (c) neither Customer nor said Guarantor have any claim against MLBFS or any of its affiliates arising out of or in connection with the Loan Documents or any other matter whatsoever; and(d) neither Customer nor said Guarantor have any defense to payment of any amounts owing, or any right of counterclaim for any reason under, the Loan Documents.
MLBFS requests that as soon as feasible Customer furnish to MLBFS the following item (however, the Effective Date of this Letter Agreement is not conditioned upon the receipt of the such item):
Provided that no Event of Default, other that the Existing Defaults, or event which with the giving of notice, passage of time, or both, would constitute an Event of Default, shall then have occurred and be continuing under the terms of the Loan Documents, and the condition specified above shall have been met to our satisfaction, the amendments and agreements in this Letter Agreement will become effective on the date (the "Effective Date") upon which: (a) Customer and the Guarantor shall have executed and returned the duplicate copy of this Letter Agreement enclosed herewith; and (b) an officer of MLBFS shall have reviewed and approved this Letter Agreement as being consistent in all respects with the original internal authorization hereof.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Customer and the Guarantor do not execute and return the duplicate copy of this Letter Agreement within 3 days from the date hereof, or if for any other reason (other than the sole fault of MLBFS) the Effective Date shall not occur within said 3-day period, then all of said amendments and agreements will, at the sole option of MLBFS, be void.
Mark W. Blodgett
Events of Default resulting from Obligors' failure to comply with the terms set forth in the Negative Pledge section of the loan documents.
Events of Default resulting from Obligors' failure to comply with the terms set forth in the Application of Proceeds section of the loan documents.
Events of Default resulting from Obligors' failure to comply with the terms set forth in the No Additional Debt section of the loan documents.