to data pretreated neck with metrics cancer recurrent newly of ongoing neck diagnosed combination patients heavily benefit continues HPV-positive and head and clinical in with treated pembrolizumab. treated patients encouraging HPV-positive recurrent The and for highly metastatic and head with from clinical the robust Anish. CUE-XXX for trial Thanks metastatic demonstrate monotherapy cancer
combination ongoing pembrolizumab with As trials platform. clinical shown proof-of-concept in of our eight, have data is on monotherapy Immuno-STAT from provided and slide and CUE-XXX derisking with the clinical
to-date and patients support continues The XXXX enhances as battling cancer. latest a further in confidence head CUE-XXX data our and observations prior neck generated potential for therapeutic in HPV-positive to
by in evidenced patient's consistently and disease. effective targeted selective of dose a CUE-XXX's and expansion generated we the date data head incurable enabling cancer believe the Recurrent as stated, provides to positive tolerated T tumor-specific previously ongoing action, cells and tough HPV directly is neck metastatic levels, mechanism of body. As
enhanced continue confidence data patients, have cells in observe control the of the position especially fact, survival Furthermore, enhanced in we microenvironment. within persistent monotherapy CUE-XXX in disease cells The resulting our T trial observed that cancer-specific we given of effect. this monotherapy enhances of mechanism the tumor-specific in due bolsters demonstrable an throughout and is CUE-XXX's and We importantly, our pattern stimulating the nd targeted antitumor these is T survival believe evolving expansion the to to action, trial. tumor
previous in shown low clinical important As supporting kilogram. microenvironment. throughout behaved attenuation with The cells trials nine, on per including and without it pattern any the cycles blood the to review cells well X the data on treatment of is the of CUE-XXX its premise differentiating consistent PK as exposure at and date, like is CUE-XXX, effects pharmacokinetics to very RPXD variability milligrams to that I'd tumor-specific new the of multiple parameters, T there's NK understand of tumor consistent webcast, demonstrates interpatient on and In features the slide mechanistic
relevant evidence of clinically immunogenicity.
CUE-XXX Regarding positive response cells associated also its known antitumor potent treatment or profile, cells cells, PD results sustained NK increase consistently in induce killing. with observed a natural killer NK to are pharmacodynamic an tumor or attribute as in a
one cells. observed Importantly, panel, shown and necrosis. the week as CUE-XXX, cells regarding T slight administration the in as robust intended only patients expansion and tumor-specific biopsies after T the of tumor of as the a observed, i.e., peripheral middle T in transient increase paired tumor-infiltrating regulatory have of in increase of post-treatment also have we demonstrate associated PD activation reacted cells early an tumor-specific and blood we consistently cells targeted in effect, T
this tumor and checkpoint a with invasion well inhibitor. T plays in clinical transforms microenvironment a as into monotherapy cells CUE-XXX when activity observed the of key combined the as believe with role observed the tumor We that
also observing favorable with In spectrum of advanced patients inhibitor described head have PK that prior neck of to we're patterns in a patients just in addition failed the and cancer, benefit HPV-positive and clinical checkpoint treatment. PD,
now efficacy As we of XX, shown are slide with before, have observed clinical on CUE-XXX monotherapy. and patterns various
experienced which shown lasted to a after an therapy. reduction burden the left, in partial year As of the durable cycles first CUE-XXX, response patient approximate evident two on XX% A at weeks on six tumor close one with
reduction cell-free the DNA remained Importantly, of with demonstrated a this on initiation patient that time response HPV significant the undetectable DNA for coincided of the HPV in partial majority treatment. also cell-free and
six. week maintained approximately disappearance Patient the had time. months of XX of patient cell-free The durable for reduction this also who response, disease at Notably, complete a with histopathological i.e., since has and have undetectable week of some the increasingly in present B, pathologic cell-free in potential observed a of who DNA had activity is tumor complete expect at cure blood of HPV XX% resection recognized DNA, suggestive point, patient, completed XX just stable HPV is we treatment may, has lesion burden disease of a the surgical which an this analysis. biomarker
no remained period than where starting tumor Patient greater months experienced by based initially on response with was began resist observed CUE-XXX. objective after a for to reduction months treatment, imaging. and After C on the therapy prolonged tumor has treatment after six on patient the XX approximately shrink drug,
months median current X of per dose treated XX overall in at months. Phase shown observed patients observed X of months is third patients approximately in survival in overall on second-line the the to a The median recommended survival As in is trials and approximately survival the XX, overall pembrolizumab, XX Slide treated of treated eight line trials XX kilogram respectively. second-line the nivolumab patients compared the in the in CheckMate -- beyond of checkpoint when median historical in and the XXX KEYNOTE-XXX observed notable milligrams
has be the any further developed disease more As is the survival third-line as it experienced becomes understand with unstable. treatment expected oncologists to less
premise activity, the recurrent to support to in in continues what expanding that increase positive meet data upon treatment a be the tumor-specific evolving with cells CUE-XXX. resulting to activity head antitumor Our patients single-agent with a meaningful metastatic this we Based for data, appears cancer. plan to durably path by T for strength CUE-XXX advanced with demonstrates and survival HPV neck registration FDA of define with
patients indicated with an ongoing As cancer. is provide approved recurrent now update on neck patients XX, on Slide with Pembrolizumab CUE-XXX for I in trial will of first-line pembrolizumab head in combination the metastatic the equal treatment PD-LX with to measure neck with a that of scores greater than of is expression first-line metastatic tumor. the have and in recurrent head tumors X%, or cancer CPS CPS
CPS to and have approximately greater observed of distribution Slide of CPS expression on XX% values CPS population of X, KEYNOTE-XXX of X PD-LX the shown XX, patients other XX. the the shows As in XX% positive that than study values
KEYNOTE-XXX shown lower with patients response median progression-free than of that patients of with lower XX alone. study at with CPS have the analysis survival compared when overall CPS survival and treated the pembrolizumab has lower greater to rates Subgroup to X overall XX
is clear improve to and outcomes to expand for checkpoint such, CPS reach for a treated low patients As the with patients inhibitors. need therapeutic all there
patients the confirmed XX, patients next first-line earnings observed XX% have observed on Since overall CUE-XXX treated shows of rate additional with pembrolizumab call. Slide current XX two we discussed response June The the with and slide, call, responses. that as the in
which confirming describe As in complete shown the complete had response, momentarily. the plot waterfall scan prior subsequent with has the slide, on I'll the this detail unconfirmed a on response patient
on In pembrolizumab response complete six Partial CUE-XXX treated of reductions at tumor of evaluable that and addition XX% the responses target XX patients RPXD reduction is partial the to patients a XX% response, have greater sum of -- lesions in first greater of with than than now experienced experienced additional the as treatment. confirmed of defined six remain burden or two the have and confirmed. XX% all greater
response overall to-date in equal compares pembrolizumab in rate or in The to patients CUE-XXX historical rate with to than confirmed of pembrolizumab with response the of observed CPS with monotherapy greater KEYNOTE-XXX XX% observed study. one treated with favorably XX%, combination the
patients scores XX% of than of combination with responses four CPS with or pembrolizumab out eight of experienced PD-LX XX% to one is, Notably, the greater objective which the approximately low of expression, XX rate i.e., alone. expected
PD-LX enhance response that patients patients significantly rate the to approximately for of with inhibition, expression, half anti-PD-X the in represents inhibitor which appears a CUE-XXX treatment eligible of such, As the particularly in have low checkpoint setting. frontline
of XX, combination according slide subgroups overall observed treated the slide, KEYNOTE-XXX alone, overall next observed shows values The response the with rates and compared therapy. rates to CPS response pembrolizumab in the CUE-XXX pembrolizumab trial, to with patients in
in of compared than XX with approximately low As of rate CPS with of response shown, pembrolizumab demonstrates greater the response observed an was to XX% that lower CPS scores, tumors scores of rate efficacy specifically, with KEYNOTE-XXX overall XX% was CPS in scores observed an XX, overall study. one to
an with greater with response XX% patients the of of response CPS which was than pembrolizumab CUE-XXX observed alone. than of score XX% is one, rate or equal to represents greater observed doubling overall with rate a all and For pembro historical
with patients response Notably, scores XX% pembro observed pembrolizumab, of CPS observed a response historical rate, and rate and to of for tripling overall XX, than of with one the greater CUE-XXX of XX% which with represents was alone.
increase pembro CPS rate also Furthermore, scores XX% with in response greater pembrolizumab a rate appears of XX% with of overall and CUE-XXX and CUE-XXX alone. rate to XX the response than for for an patients response
PD-X enhancing to in suggests responses likely rate patients is In so, receive the does not patients scores, of i.e., it enhance patients that traditionally important also substantially to demonstrably This does one respond. that inhibition, but data response to by all CPS that that only appear totality, low of our particularly to are less represent with XX% pembrolizumab. since XX approximately eligible are CUE-XXX
the on on evidencing the CR, continued slide clinical shown non-target XX time data response demonstrates confirmed of Additional and in lesions course both with now the target improvement. patient
tongue eight lymph at lymph two a in and target of liver lesion disease the the bone, in non-target the nodes. had nodes of patient The base a centimeters, and burden approximately comprising disease
observed of Partial to findings the complete at have At in normal a weeks complete was lymph in all at followed and nodes, response for the were at size first lymph response XX tonsil observed week was evidence the other was target target they at nodes, the disease response XX, performed of and scan a week addition confirmed observed criteria lesions, six The of on response. weeks. lesion at by XX. was complete i.e., in XX Two a response meets a complete complete XX in response to all radiologic size less which, reduced a in scans millimeters, than the RECIST lesions weeks.
Slide plot, on II XX the remain ongoing dose shows last XX shown as trial treated follow-up at of patients swimmer that of CUE-XXX for the The XX Phase combination date the to patient. alive of each in the recommended
just II we screening. months, beyond lived the additional in pembrolizumab recently study. nine was XXth Phase in remain KEYNOTE-XXX median and the five survival patient note, patients the overall Of treated with alone and update, which patients treated on observed have treatment, four an recommended As in XX patients to at patients date, the have dose
progression-free SITC. at to strengthen meeting data also an Society the combination survival November as on of patients data well The dose The for an the additional swimmer and forward Cancer, emerging in Immunotherapy CUE-XXX at patients the with trend to new Phase extension update treated emerging as plot on first of follow-up cumulative known also pembrolizumab. shows in patients therapy of of the these of recommended continues data at on we II providing XX treated look
and beyond of in demonstration overall the as and XX, recommended based in and median by third CUE-XXX include detailed in patients partial Phase cohort. monotherapy evidence on in follow-up dose survival II line a resist single-agent stable treated third with patients neck observations cancer Slide antitumor survival durable metastatic the response head disease and benefit recurrent efficacy from beyond line Key and
a patients robust The announced, FDA treatment the designation previously Fast on monotherapy define for facilitate the enable will in first with registration the line data and with Track path. activity third both As pembrolizumab, settings. monotherapy granting of Track of the designation CUE-XXX's Fast the combination and in interactions to planned in
these from HPV-EX targeted checkpoint clear with as of and blockade complementary T activity data agent with we cumulative inhibition expansion evidence enhance of and The a efficacy a specific cells with antitumor ongoing for us have believe CUE-XXX provided of checkpoint trials mechanism as patient what will therapy. reach broaden with single
As series for potential has believe we patients. from CUE-XXX IL-X-based from a the breakthrough biologics a CUE-XXX from believe first biologic CUE-XXX. our such, CUE-XXX validation beginning provided the CUE-XXX, and with our data additional therapeutic derisking we therapeutic represents series Furthermore, for mechanistic
reminder, us acid as also for signs are studies a to required As shown at and XX, a and escalation cost of to initiate toxicology milligram biologic we're CUE-XXX. identity. development IND-enabling CUE-XXX clear able on dose repeat the decrease study This amino X by CUE-XXX at observed shared CUE-XXX to we per time CUE-XXX we with XX% not the and activity FDA kilogram, sequence Slide significantly enabled Phase of the which dose X
enrolling or gastric, the to ability the cancers. for and continues indications all monotherapy go observed Slide studies screening study CUE-XXX all design well, pancreatic enrollment being XX. date investigator of in on therapies escalation WTX in effective in of in The rate underscoring us escalation conducting study dose patient in offers This four the in expressing are summarized The evaluated colon, trial. the are is indications. cancers. phase perform We Findings enthusiasm ovarian need to the dose exceedingly actively patients any the expansion to
dose-limiting of cohorts, in activity date tumor in per We're observed. in has milligrams pretreated kilogram kilogram anti-tumor well markers reductions the Evidence been toxicities stable been including patients. several observed reductions heavily disease already currently enrolling CUE-XXX in to target patients and expanding and X at X and with milligram X tolerated has patients, lesions, no per
the that XX% X XX continues seen cancer sum X observed progressed the experienced gastric on activity at lesions with scans prior scans lines of as therapy, with a approximately are per clinical kilogram a minus the kilogram at X of including X patients decrease signs three on weeks particularly of treatment. kilogram inhibitor, patient and pending. on currently and milligram were and X, the dosed dose and has per of a milligrams in These example, are currently patient XX early the and three For per milligram at in encouraging levels they checkpoint target milligrams
where We November. largely to the indications are these have antitumor look forward been of activity SITC inhibitors additional these meeting encouraged by data We checkpoint early monotherapy observations ineffective. in in presenting at
turn now will call I over to the Anish? Anish.