a continues multiple not treated in newly clinical only Anish. outcomes Thanks, and CUE-XXX and guidance for diagnosed a for highly with today's series you the everyone listening of demonstrated cancer the robust also to we FDA, with HPV+ aligned end and ongoing data in forward a of benefit patient trial metastatic defined for cancer metrics but CUE-XXX or forward, metastatic the cancers.
The breakthrough opportunity on the had demonstrate meeting with clinical recurrent with data summary the recurrent treated from pembrolizumab improving as received trial patients heavily have recent of call.
I an to achieved the on monotherapy. combination of Phase head across Good neck potential head path CUE-XXX. we to pleased pretreated milestones registration afternoon believe and have Type encouraging and we I the am recently for registration where We with and provide B as path with to clinical important patients developmental neck update particularly
highest due in plan reduce also dose first-line in of combination confidence potential likely setting, approach registrational also market setting to conduct mechanism increase paradigm, This HPV+ patient assessment as we Phase would is forward most optimal of pembrolizumab the manner. straight and randomized in resulting III KEYTRUDA population to cost-effective the to of for action pursue of treatment we setting To and cancer. market means registrational It significantly extending with intend the which neck of CUE-XXX adjuvant with and We second-line generating optimal the the larger design path reach further clear CUE-XXX direct this probability probability that a head first-line with compared impact confirmation as and between success with the in with believe a Phase a the registrational setting will with to succeeding into market, the this move will the with and the approach complementary treatment CUE-XXX to effect, data the patient largest the combination of the trial.
We alone available represents a over of represents provide opportunities. II time. patients treatment represents along believe KEYTRUDA, in this in study recurrent and durability trial metastatic pembrolizumab the and end, overall trial upstream
observations, trials proof-of-concept platform. clinical to pembrolizumab provided shown prior enhancing monotherapy in validation CUE-XXX to and bolster in the data generated X, derisking for outcomes have The Slide with improve our our with cancer. to further to CUE-XXX in as clinical from and battling data latest potential date Immuno-STAT As neck ongoing therapeutic HPV+ XXXX continues patients on as of a confidence combination and head
stated, previously generated we the of As dosing evidenced believe CUE-XXX's targeted and consistently to and T of unique data expansion and effective date enables tumor-specific the cells. action, mechanism selective tolerated by as
expansion the favorably X survival months, to pembrolizumab. to of second patients in treated mechanism continue advanced metastatic neck We previously of greater expansion in enhanced this patients trials tumor repeated We at action tumor-specific currently approximately believe kilogram per monotherapy.
Notably, stimulation the CUE-XXX the head median beyond is overall with as than observed recurrent in with survival prolonged especially given second-line dose XX the is and to and of compares observe survival survival presented, treated microenvironment. nivolumab line of and the historical T due cells CUE-XXX's the which in X-milligram median monotherapy cancer of overall the months
blood care in observed findings the rate believe of support survival overall rate doubling strategy efficacy setting, clinical as earlier of larger neoadjuvant within pharmacodynamic a combination is therapy, benefit.
Pembrolizumab and median may with adjuvant support with We patients overall in into momentarily, moving lines As as such number upstream compared further with the development the historical Enrollment response setting, in in the to progressing is addition these of metastatic where a well in approved the CUE-XXX patients and with the recurrent the of response tumors observed are pembrolizumab a increases of first-line progression-free standard cells shown observed observed observations of the tumor KEYNOTE-XXX greater to rates the to response head study. neck survival of rate CUE-XXX treatment observations CPS and pembrolizumab have a first-line monotherapy. represents progression-free the in than patients trial patients treated recurrent in XX% NK in microenvironment.
These than metastatic previously reported. the of PD-LX treated of EX-specific as of cells with expression expansion or with scores X%. changes consistent preliminary that is in with of on a greater peripheral antitumor T CPS and measure based equal cancer
Following or rate equal XX%, response the as CUE-XXX, greater of overall with with date response rate than pembrolizumab compared Slide CPS treated overall a combination XX, shown greater monotherapy. than treatment to observed doubling in patients historical represents observed the to XX% of on to with X
the on tumor significant shown patients, partial confirmed plot, across As waterfall have observed responses patient. and response in confirmed we many patients including in XX reductions X a
the rate represents approximately historical to in is pembrolizumab, in greater does values the compares as data progression-free that patients currently improved median the response X have on setting. of CPS for in of inhibitor An KEYNOTE-XXX estimate scores, kg is but note, shown the demonstrably stable Notably, with low historical response with XX.
Of which year. to approximately of i.e., patients patient. the survival been the a with are with for was of that as portends is of patients per in throughout on Slide survival observation to as the patients for shown X.X less frontline to observed expansion durable. dose not observed with overall combination in slide, treated matures months PD-X CUE-XXX with right.
Furthermore, trial, target next follow-up all lesions. survival, favorably patients X survival the X as the pembrolizumab last our monotherapy enhance overall which with in which that tripling on appear progression-free it CUE-XXX trial observed combination the exhibit shown likely X.X scores, each disease rate months This alive respond. by and positive pembrolizumab of XX% XX of low the enhancing on in This XX% reductions including remain checkpoint for are suggests in so rate of XX% particularly important of in overall eligible patients these the median the progression-free reflected Kaplan-Meier median The represent treatment, than totality, very XX, does Importantly, traditionally treatment date, patients XX the XX the patients observed substantially since the with for alone.
In an left, responses of response CPS to with CUE-XXX well ongoing pembrolizumab, only inhibition, CPS CUE-XXX that their mg responses treated remain also the that is
As left treated patients observed peripheral Slide HPV of have XX, tumor-specific cells with the the panel in on we T EX-specific expansion shown of in CUE-XXX. of the blood robust
date, and [ to in as with Phase ] substrate dose analysis or have Phase support the occurred with this increasingly first-line multiple we and to approximately II decrease is registrational supporting of of As The recurrent their cancer trial PFS of magnitude further rate trial the In future with response observed disease in subsequent II shown with to defined of burden XX patients patients after first of doses occur all primary confirm Project DNA, course endpoint enrolled. on endpoints. Slide pembrolizumab a responses.
Reductions others, Type neck pembrolizumab X to objective on the RECIST. with CUE-XXX will The FDA will XX. in CUE-XXX earlier productive of trial the responses the disease year. meeting, observed the response the months have have secondary right, directive.
An DNA for HPV guidance used be alone. graph provided consistent on be magnitude tested the displayed a [CUE-XXX on that from also OS XXX% this HPV XX] overview we FDA, this overall path pembrolizumab Optimus approximate is that data meeting an stable in on which for B and an patients the X small cell-free randomized were durable the by Treatment-naive which biomarker cell-free experienced of aligned primary trial HPV+ of recognized the plus the as combination planned including is anticipated Overall design is metastatic a with to patient with CUE-XXX including the registrational trial been a head
the As patients cell neck is treatment and first-line outlined trial. tested the combination head II We for HPV+ and overall on clinical squamous in published of trial the the effect, CUE-XXX the this in Slide estimation and benefit probability will treatment to a observed provide increase III of carcinoma compared confirmation success resulting clear compelling dose data. believe to be Phase Phase historical with of design data XX, with registrational
the CUE-XXX a provided demonstrated which the from additional for will CUE-XXX program, now As with biologics the series. believe has mechanistic data I CUE-XXX discuss, derisking we IL-X-based validation and from
repeat Slide acid CUE-XXX As and shown decrease This sequence as amino not on XX% we a we by CUE-XXX milligram escalation the Phase which dose FDA us to activity studies were of at identity. at significantly are to biologic CUE-XXX, also we CUE-XXX and I signs observed to IND-enabling XX, per shared development required time of cost reminder, dose kilogram, for toxicology clear the with X able a CUE-XXX. the study and enabled initiate
indications currently completed without the the in now X are in trial. of toxicities enrolling dose patients phase dose-limiting the study observing have expansion of escalation any portion XXX We all and the
with patients recurrent in areas pancreatic gastric, of numbers Slide cancer of colon a greater options. of these that and on metastatic high Note needs. therapeutic are unmet XXX,XXX ovarian, need represent shown As collective XX, than disease
in of samples blood to other are almost number from future.
Emerging pharmacodynamic equal data with eligible Slide from CUE-XXX patients patients WTX-positive cancers on benefit addition, with therapy an shown XX. treated CUE-XXX is the In of
with and As been robust experience selective seen patients these consistent minus the expansion is expected therapy, checkpoint gastric patient X our representative as CUE-XXX lines and drive -- decrease to a sets among experienced has here sum with of tumor-specific a examples shown with X and at cancer of on with right.
A has data left, noted enhance target CUE-XXX, progressed treated Expansion the cells week lesions that T X reductions T here. on with preclinical potential of our with cells shown antitumor WTX-specific of inhibitor, the prior the including on of to XX% tumor the the in immunity XX.
come Another patient burden a found time cancer example pancreatic of on right. is off the now reduction note, of subsequent Unfortunately, benefited tumor in type. in than treatment. Also for in on a has devastatingly ovarian remarkable shown this is tumor study treated months, X lesions have aggressive of to stable patient recurrent greater with metastatic maintaining the patients these have X scans and on new were which the disease cancer this through setting
encouraging Given the WTX actively enrolling and in well, indications into The all the the of enthusiasm in all stable all patients and underscoring for expand indications. and activity, continue go screening enrollment with effective is indications. patients therapies of protocol exceedingly clinical signals study the investigators, enthusiasm X expressing X X amended cancers. these to disease need was to including Patient observed the multiple of rate investigator across
a while for immunotherapies. the changing the inhibitors improvement. options patients, XX, substantial major checkpoint There realizing of challenges there been potential need note impact important As to persistent positive a on have that fullest significant had in therapeutic demonstrated have on it's remains Slide for
being broad significant enable suboptimal immune regards modalities providers and reach.
We pursued, approaches and with to solution tolerability well for as While will believe many patient exist defining effective for with to as therapeutic safety, forward challenges modulation challenges are combination combination inhibitors. example, emerge leaders treatment for approaches, market best-in-class therapies, these more both stand-alone paths the as as to checkpoint options efficacy
inhibition, expand and this expanding therapeutic As complements and We mechanism just T platform patient benefit reach that demonstrated represents short, thus the a benefit our immunotherapy. in by chart. as conveyed, of towards number we to the has the believe cells of enhancing enhancing expand platform therapeutic selectively of patients ability tumor-specific benefit.
In significantly of potential the the to our the targeted checkpoint believe CUE-XXX major and full realizing patient magnitude of activate reach increasing potential that breakthrough
early across will further Anish. are both forward observations in ASCO have programs monotherapy, CUE-XXX additional checkpoint call now of over largely activity multiple look by at We indications encouraged inhibitors I presenting June. to on antitumor to ineffective. turn data the been the where We Anish?