The corporate segment includes the results of operations and financial condition of AGL Resources' nonoperating business units, including AGL Services Company (AGSC) and AGL Capital Corporation. AGSC is a service company established in accordance with the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (PUHCA). AGL Capital Corporation was established to finance the acquisition of VNG; refinance existing short-term debt; and fund ongoing financing needs of AGL Resources and its subsidiaries through a commercial paper program, the issuance of various debt and hybrid securities, and other financing mechanisms. All the costs associated with AGSC and the financing costs associated with AGL Capital Corporation are allocated to the operating segments, in accordance with PUHCA. The corporate segment also includes intercompany eliminations for transactions between operating business segments.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
For a summary of AGL Resources' accounting policies, please refer to AGL Resources' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2001.
Change in Fiscal Year End
On September 20, 2001, the Board of Directors of AGL Resources Inc. elected to change the Company's fiscal year end from September 30 to December 31 effective immediately, as announced in its current report on Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2001. The three-month period ended December 31, 2001 is the Company's transition period. This Transition Report on Form 10-Q presents the Company's results of operations for the three-month period ended December 31, 2001.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
During July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." Under SFAS 142, goodwill amortization ceases when the new standard is adopted. The new rules also require an initial goodwill impairment assessment in the year of adoption and an annual impairment test thereafter. AGL Resources adopted SFAS No. 142 effective October 1, 2001. As a result, goodwill amortization of approximately $5 million on an annualized basis ceased. No impairment charges have been recognized as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 142.
3. Earnings Per Common Share and Common Stockholders' Equity
Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share reflect the potential dilution that could occur when common share equivalents are added to common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share are calculated quarterly and the number of incremental shares to be included at year-end is the weighted average of each quarterly calculation. AGL Resources' potential common share equivalents are derived from performance units whose future issuance is contingent upon the satisfaction of certain performance criteria and stock options whose exercise prices were less than the average market price of the common shares for the respective periods. Performance units totaling 11,430 and 6,574qualified as common share equivalents as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. An average of 285,534, and 377,207 incremental shares qualified as potential common shares during the three-month periods ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, because the exercise prices of those options were less than the average market price of the common shares for the respective periods.
During the three-month periods ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, AGL Resources issued 491,000 shares and 195,764 shares of common stock out of treasury, respectively, under ResourcesDirect, a direct stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan; the Retirement Savings Plus Plan (RSP Plan); the Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (LTSIP); the Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP); and the Non-Employee Directors Equity Compensation Plan (Directors Plan).
4. Risk Management
AGL Resources is exposed to market risks associated with interest rates and commodity prices. At the direction of the Board of Directors, management has established comprehensive risk management policies to monitor and manage these market risks. AGL Resources' Risk Management Committee is responsible for the overall approval of risk management policies and the delegation of approval and authorization levels. The Risk Management Committee consists of senior executives who monitor market risk positions, corporate exposures, credit exposures and overall results of AGL Resources' risk management activities.
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 138, "Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities," establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. AGL Resources adopted SFAS No. 133 on October 1, 2000. The impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 133 on AGL Resources' consolidated financial statements at October 1, 2000 was immaterial.
On November 30, 2001, AGL Capital Corporation entered into two Interest Rate Swap Transactions (Swaps) in the aggregate amount of $75.0 million as a hedge against the fair value of the AGL Capital Trust II's 8% Trust Preferred Securities due 2041. Pursuant to the Swaps, AGL Capital Corporation will receive future interest rate payments on $75.0 million at an annual 8% interest rate, and pay floating interest rates on $75.0 million. AGL Capital Corporation will pay interest each May 15, August 15, November 15 and February 15 at three-month LIBOR plus 1.315%, with no floor or ceiling. The expiration date of the Swaps is May 15, 2041, unless terminated earlier or called. Each quarter, AGL Capital will record a long-term asset or liability to reflect the assessed change in fair value of the Swaps to AGL Capital Corporation. The fair value is zero at inception, however the fair value changes as interest rates change from the original settlement date. At December 31, 2001, the fair value of thes e Swaps is $2.2 million, which is included as a liability in other deferred credits.
Sequent follows Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 98-10 (EITF 98-10) (Accounting for Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities) in reporting the fair value of its energy contracts and any changes in earnings. EITF 98-10 also provides Sequent factors to consider for purposes of identifying energy trading activities.
Sequent enters into various gas put and/or call agreements as part of its trading activities, which primarily focus on: (1) managing AGL Resources' overall gas costs, (2) generating premium income on options and (3) ensuring adequate gas reserves. The contract terms normally last one calendar month and are designed to protect AGL Resources against the adverse effects that daily gas index fluctuations may have on gas purchases.
During the three months ended December 31, 2001, AGL Resources recorded an unrealized gain of $2.0 million related to derivative instruments as a result of trading activities.
5. Environmental Matters
Before natural gas was widely available in the Southeast, AGLC manufactured gas from coal and other fuels. Those manufacturing operations were known as manufactured gas plants (MGPs), which AGLC ceased operating in the 1950s. Because of recent environmental concerns, AGLC is required to investigate possible environmental contamination at those plants and, if necessary, clean up any contamination.
AGLC has been associated with 10 MGP sites in Georgia and 3 in Florida. Based on investigations to date, AGLC believes that some cleanup is likely at most of the sites. In Georgia, the state Environmental Protection Division (EPD) supervises the investigation and cleanup of MGP sites. In Florida, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has that responsibility.
As of December 31, 2001, AGLC has obtained approval from EPD of corrective action plans for nine Georgia sites. In addition, AGLC, along with other parties, has started an EPA-approved cleanup in St. Augustine, Florida, and expects to receive EPA approval for the first phase of cleanup in Sanford, Florida, within the next few months.
AGLC has historically reported cleanup cost estimates for remediation based on probabilistic models of potential costs. As cleanup options and plans continue to develop and cleanup contracts are entered into, AGLC is increasingly able to provide conventional engineering estimates of the likely costs of many elements of its MGP program. Accordingly, AGLC has updated its MGP cleanup cost estimates, where possible, to reflect these engineering estimates. For those elements of the MGP program where AGLC has engineering cost estimates, AGLC believes that the most likely cost of future actions at its MGP sites will be $163.0 million. This estimate still contains various engineering uncertainties, and could increase as contracts are entered into, perhaps by as much as 50%. For those elements of the MGP program where AGLC still cannot perform engineering cost estimates, there remains considerable variability in available cost estimates. For these elements AGLC believes that the remaining cost of f uture actions at its MGP sites will be within a range of $8.0 million to $25.2 million. AGLC cannot at this time identify any single number within this range as a better estimate of its likely future costs. Consequently, as of December 31, 2001, AGLC has recorded the sum of $163.0 million plus the lower end of the remaining range, $8.0 million, or a total of $171.0 million, as a liability and a corresponding regulatory asset. This figure does not include other potential expenses, such as unasserted property damage, personal injury or natural resource damage claims, legal expenses, or other costs for which AGLC may be held liable, but with respect to which the amount cannot be reasonably forecast.
AGLC has two ways of recovering investigation and cleanup costs. First, the GPSC has approved an environmental response cost recovery rider. It allows the recovery of costs of investigation, testing, cleanup and litigation. Because of that rider, AGLC has recorded a regulatory asset for actual and projected future costs related to investigation and cleanup, to be recovered from the ratepayers in future years. During the three months ended December 31, 2001, AGLC recovered $3.9 million through its environmental response cost recovery rider.
The second way AGLC can recover costs is by exercising the legal rights AGLC believes it has to recover a share of its costs from other potentially responsible parties, typically former owners or operators of the MGP sites. There were no material recoveries during the three months ended December 31, 2001.
6. Segment Information
AGL Resources is organized into three operating segments: