OMB APPROVAL |
OMB Number: 3235-0570 |
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSRS
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-08413
Evergreen Equity Trust
_____________________________________________________________
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
_____________________________________________________________
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Michael H. Koonce, Esq.
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
____________________________________________________________
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 210-3200
Date of fiscal year end: | Registrant is making a semi-annual filing for one of its series, Evergreen Diversified Capital Builder Fund, for the six months ended September 30, 2009. This series has March 31 fiscal year end. |
Date of reporting period: September 30, 2009
Item 1 – Reports to Stockholders.
Evergreen Diversified Capital Builder Fund
|
| table of contents |
1 |
| LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS |
4 |
| FUND AT A GLANCE |
7 |
| ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
8 |
| FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS |
12 |
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
19 |
| STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
20 |
| STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
21 |
| STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS |
22 |
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
36 |
| TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS |
This semiannual report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus of the Evergreen fund contained herein. The prospectus contains more complete information, including fees and expenses, and should be read carefully before investing or sending money.
The fund will file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q will be available on the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800.SEC.0330.
A description of the fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, as well as information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available by visiting our Web site at EvergreenInvestments.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov. The fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures are also available without charge, upon request, by calling 800.343.2898.
Mutual Funds:
NOT FDIC INSURED | MAY LOSE VALUE | NOT BANK GUARANTEED |
Evergreen InvestmentsSM is a service mark of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC. Copyright 2009, Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC.
Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC is a subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company and is an affiliate of Wells Fargo & Company’s other Broker Dealer subsidiaries.
Evergreen mutual funds are distributed by Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. 200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS
November 2009
W. Douglas Munn
President and Chief Executive Officer
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to provide the Semiannual Report for Evergreen Diversified Capital Builder Fund for the six-month period ended September 30, 2009 (the “period”).
The period was characterized by a strong equity market rally that spanned the first half of the fiscal year. U.S. and international stocks rallied off their March 9th lows, with international and small cap stocks leading the gains. Signs of stability emerged in the corporate credit markets, as both issuance and performance improved. The price of oil surged in the second quarter of 2009, pulling most commodities higher, as gold gave back earlier gains and the dollar weakened. The period ended with stocks finishing a banner third quarter 2009, as major market indexes, both domestic and international, climbed by approximately 15% and investor sentiment was buoyed by signs of improvement in the economy and corporate earnings. In international markets, equity indexes have doubled in the developing world from their lows of last year, while the market gains in developed economies have been somewhat more muted.
At the end of the period, the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) reiterated its commitment to keeping the benchmark lending rate near zero for an “extended period.” Additionally, the Fed’s statement changed somewhat from the previous meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee, altering text regarding economic activity from “leveling out” to activity that has “picked up.” It should be emphasized, however, that this shift, which might be construed as a signal from the Fed that the recession is over, is followed by a statement that household spending was still being constrained by “job losses, sluggish income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit.” While this data reflects an economy that is managing to climb from the depths reached in March, we question whether the fundamentals are in place for sustainable growth, given that economic reports continue to display data that is simply “less bad” than the previous depths of the recession. Until we see stabilization in home prices and employment, it is unlikely that activity will exceed much beyond what is considered to be “below potential” for any period of time.
Considering falling home prices and rising unemployment, along with oil prices that are 50% below the levels from the same period last year, concerns about inflationary pressures during the period appear to have been overblown. Indeed, at the midpoint in the fiscal year, market interest rates apparently reflect this assessment—despite rising federal outlays—with the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note having fallen below 3.5% at the end of the period. Though market interest rates remain low by
1
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued
historical standards, the spread, or interest rate differential, between the federal funds rate and the 10-year Treasury is among its widest levels in history.
In this challenging environment, the manager of Evergreen Diversified Capital Builder Fund remained focused on the primary goals of seeking both capital appreciation and generous income. Toward the end of this period, the fund’s management increased the fund’s equity holdings while reducing the percentage of assets held in fixed income securities, reflecting their optimism that even a modest recovery in the second half of the year offers the prospect of higher valuations for equities.
We believe the changing conditions in the investment environment over the period have underscored the value of a well-diversified, long-term investment strategy that seeks to help soften the effects of volatility in any one market or asset class. As always, we encourage investors to maintain diversified investment portfolios in pursuit of their long-term investment goals.
Please visit us at EvergreenInvestments.com for more information about our funds and other investment products available to you. Thank you for your continued support of Evergreen Investments.
Sincerely,
W. Douglas Munn
President and Chief Executive Officer
Evergreen Funds
2
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS continued
Notice to Shareholders:
Effective after the close of business on June 30, 2009, Class B shares of the Fund were closed to new accounts and additional purchases by existing shareholders. Existing shareholders of Class B shares of the Fund may continue to exchange their Class B shares for Class B shares of other Evergreen Funds subject to the limitations described in each fund’s prospectus and may also continue to add to their accounts through dividend reinvestment. All other Class B share features and attributes, including, but not limited to, the 12b-1 fee, contingent deferred sales charge and conversion after a number of years to Class A shares, remain unchanged. Shareholders of the Fund may continue to redeem Fund shares in the manner described in the Fund’s prospectus.
3
FUND AT A GLANCE
as of September 30, 2009
MANAGEMENT TEAM
Investment Advisor:
Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC
Portfolio Manager:
Margaret D. Patel
CURRENT INVESTMENT STYLE
Source: Morningstar, Inc.
Morningstar’s style box is based on a portfolio date as of 9/30/2009.
The Equity style box placement is based on 10 growth and valuation measures for each fund holding and the median size of the companies in which the fund invests.
The Fixed Income style box placement is based on a fund’s average effective maturity or duration and the average credit rating of the bond portfolio.
PERFORMANCE AND RETURNS
Portfolio inception date: 9/11/1935
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class I |
Class inception date | 1/20/1998 | 9/11/1935 | 1/22/1998 | 1/26/1998 |
Nasdaq symbol | EKBAX | EKBBX | EKBCX | EKBYX |
6-month return with sales charge | 23.50% | 26.43% | 29.71% | N/A |
6-month return w/o sales charge | 31.18% | 31.43% | 30.71% | 31.24% |
Average annual return* |
|
|
|
|
1-year with sales charge | -8.30% | -7.00% | -4.31% | N/A |
1-year w/o sales charge | -2.77% | -2.97% | -3.51% | -2.56% |
5-year | -2.18% | -1.93% | -1.73% | -0.75% |
10-year | -0.37% | -0.48% | -0.51% | 0.46% |
Maximum sales charge | 5.75% | 5.00% | 1.00% | N/A |
| Front-end | CDSC | CDSC |
|
* | Adjusted for maximum applicable sales charge, unless noted. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The performance quoted represents past performance and current performance may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that investors’ shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end for Classes A, B, C or I, please go to EvergreenInvestments.com/fundperformance. The performance of each class may vary based on differences in loads, fees and expenses paid by the shareholders investing in each class. Performance includes the reinvestment of income dividends and capital gain distributions. Performance shown does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
The fund incurs a 12b-1 fee of 0.25% for Class A and 1.00% for Classes B and C. Class I does not pay a 12b-1 fee.
The returns shown for Class B shares do not reflect the conversion of Class B shares to Class A shares after eight years.
Class B shares are closed to new investments by new and existing shareholders.
Returns reflect expense limits previously in effect, without which returns would have been lower.
4
FUND AT A GLANCE continued
Comparison of a $10,000 investment in the Evergreen Diversified Capital Builder Fund Class A shares versus a similar investment in the Evergreen Diversified Capital Builder Blended Index (EDCBBI), the BofA Merrill Lynch High Yield Master Index† (BofAMLHYMI), the Russell 1000 Index (Russell 1000) and the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
The EDCBBI, the BofAMLHYMI and the Russell 1000 are unmanaged market indexes and do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses or any taxes. The CPI is a commonly used measure of inflation and does not represent an investment return. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
Class I shares are only offered, subject to the minimum initial purchase requirements, in the following manner: (1) to investment advisory clients of EIMC (or its advisory affiliates), (2) to employer- or state-sponsored benefit plans, including but not limited to, retirement plans, defined benefit plans, deferred compensation plans, or savings plans, (3) to fee-based mutual fund wrap accounts, (4) through arrangements entered into on behalf of the Evergreen funds with certain financial services firms, (5) to certain institutional investors, and (6) to persons who owned Class Y shares in registered name in an Evergreen fund on or before December 31, 1994 or who owned shares of any SouthTrust fund in registered name as of March 18, 2005 or who owned shares of Vestaur Securities Fund as of May 20, 2005.
Class I shares are only available to institutional shareholders with a minimum of $1 million investment, which may be waived in certain situations.
The fund’s investment objective may be changed without a vote of the fund’s shareholders.
Foreign investments may contain more risk due to the inherent risks associated with changing political climates, foreign market instability and foreign currency fluctuations.
Small and mid cap securities may be subject to special risks associated with narrower product lines and limited financial resources compared to their large cap counterparts, and, as a result, small and mid cap securities may decline significantly in market downturns and may be more volatile than those of larger companies due to the higher risk of failure.
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities are generally subject to higher prepayment risks than other types of debt securities, which can limit the potential for gain in a declining interest rate environment and increase the potential for loss in a rising interest rate environment. Mortgage-backed securities may also be structured so that they are particularly sensitive to interest rates.
5
FUND AT A GLANCE continued
This section left intentionally blank
Derivatives involve additional risks including interest rate risk, credit risk, the risk of improper valuation and the risk of non-correlation to the relevant instruments they are designed to hedge or to closely track.
High yield, lower-rated bonds may contain more risk due to the increased possibility of default.
The return of principal is not guaranteed due to fluctuation in the fund’s NAV caused by changes in the price of individual bonds held by the fund and the buying and selling of bonds by the fund. Bond funds have the same inflation, interest rate and credit risks as individual bonds. Generally, the value of bond funds rises when prevailing interest rates fall, and falls when interest rates rise.
U.S. government guarantees apply only to certain securities held in the fund’s portfolio and not to the fund’s shares.
The Evergreen Diversified Capital Builder Blended Index is composed of the following indexes: Russell 1000 (75%) and BofAMLHYMI (25%).
† Copyright 2009. BofA Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated. All rights reserved.
All data is as of September 30, 2009, and subject to change.
6
ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES
The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.
Example
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from April 1, 2009 to September 30, 2009.
The example illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:
• Actual expenses
The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
• Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees. Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| Beginning | Ending |
|
| Account Value | Account Value | Expenses Paid |
| 4/1/2009 | 9/30/2009 | During Period* |
Actual |
|
|
|
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,311.77 | $ 6.78 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,314.30 | $11.14 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,307.13 | $11.10 |
Class I | $1,000.00 | $1,312.36 | $ 5.33 |
Hypothetical |
|
|
|
(5% return before expenses) |
|
|
|
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,019.20 | $ 5.92 |
Class B | $1,000.00 | $1,015.44 | $ 9.70 |
Class C | $1,000.00 | $1,015.44 | $ 9.70 |
Class I | $1,000.00 | $1,020.46 | $ 4.66 |
* | For each class of the fund, expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of each class (1.17% for Class A, 1.92% for Class B, 1.92% for Class C and 0.92% for Class I), multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183 / 365 days. |
7
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
CLASS A |
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended March 31, |
| ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| ||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period |
| $ | 4.18 |
| $ | 8.28 |
| $ | 9.35 |
| $ | 8.90 |
| $ | 8.30 |
| $ | 8.20 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Income from investment operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
| 0.03 | 1 |
| 0.11 |
|
| 0.18 |
|
| 0.18 |
|
| 0.18 |
|
| 0.14 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments |
|
| 1.27 |
|
| (3.33 | ) |
| (0.44 | ) |
| 0.43 |
|
| 0.58 |
|
| 0.13 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
| 1.30 |
|
| (3.22 | ) |
| (0.26 | ) |
| 0.61 |
|
| 0.76 |
|
| 0.27 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to shareholders from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
| (0.03 | ) |
| (0.13 | ) |
| (0.18 | ) |
| (0.16 | ) |
| (0.16 | ) |
| (0.17 | ) |
Net realized gains |
|
| 0 |
|
| (0.75 | ) |
| (0.63 | ) |
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to shareholders |
|
| (0.03 | ) |
| (0.88 | ) |
| (0.81 | ) |
| (0.16 | ) |
| (0.16 | ) |
| (0.17 | ) |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period |
| $ | 5.45 |
| $ | 4.18 |
| $ | 8.28 |
| $ | 9.35 |
| $ | 8.90 |
| $ | 8.30 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total return2 |
|
| 31.18 | % |
| (38.57 | )% |
| (3.45 | )% |
| 6.92 | % |
| 9.14 | % |
| 3.29 | % |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Ratios and supplemental data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets, end of period (millions) |
| $ | 452 |
| $ | 366 |
| $ | 742 |
| $ | 900 |
| $ | 986 |
| $ | 592 |
|
Ratios to average net assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses including waivers/reimbursements but excluding expense reductions |
|
| 1.17 | %3 |
| 1.04 | % |
| 0.96 | % |
| 0.99 | % |
| 0.99 | % |
| 1.00 | % |
Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements and expense reductions |
|
| 1.17 | %3 |
| 1.06 | % |
| 1.03 | % |
| 1.02 | % |
| 1.03 | % |
| 1.00 | % |
Net investment income |
|
| 1.27 | %3 |
| 1.74 | % |
| 1.96 | % |
| 2.04 | % |
| 1.91 | % |
| 1.85 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate |
|
| 32 | % |
| 60 | % |
| 91 | % |
| 67 | % |
| 77 | % |
| 103 | % |
|
1 | Per share amount is based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
2 | Excluding applicable sales charges |
3 | Annualized |
See Notes to Financial Statements
8
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
CLASS B |
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended March 31, |
| ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| ||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period |
| $ | 4.19 |
| $ | 8.29 |
| $ | 9.35 |
| $ | 8.90 |
| $ | 8.30 |
| $ | 8.20 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Income from investment operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
| 0.01 | 1 |
| 0.06 | 1 |
| 0.12 | 1 |
| 0.12 | 1 |
| 0.11 | 1 |
| 0.09 | 1 |
Net realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments |
|
| 1.29 |
|
| (3.33 | ) |
| (0.45 | ) |
| 0.42 |
|
| 0.59 |
|
| 0.12 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
| 1.30 |
|
| (3.27 | ) |
| (0.33 | ) |
| 0.54 |
|
| 0.70 |
|
| 0.21 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to shareholders from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
| (0.01 | ) |
| (0.08 | ) |
| (0.10 | ) |
| (0.09 | ) |
| (0.10 | ) |
| (0.11 | ) |
Net realized gains |
|
| 0 |
|
| (0.75 | ) |
| (0.63 | ) |
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to shareholders |
|
| (0.01 | ) |
| (0.83 | ) |
| (0.73 | ) |
| (0.09 | ) |
| (0.10 | ) |
| (0.11 | ) |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period |
| $ | 5.48 |
| $ | 4.19 |
| $ | 8.29 |
| $ | 9.35 |
| $ | 8.90 |
| $ | 8.30 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total return2 |
|
| 31.43 | % |
| (39.13 | )% |
| (4.09 | )% |
| 6.12 | % |
| 8.45 | % |
| 2.55 | % |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Ratios and supplemental data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets, end of period (millions) |
| $ | 18 |
| $ | 18 |
| $ | 53 |
| $ | 104 |
| $ | 190 |
| $ | 77 |
|
Ratios to average net assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses including waivers/reimbursements but excluding expense reductions |
|
| 1.92 | %3 |
| 1.78 | % |
| 1.69 | % |
| 1.69 | % |
| 1.69 | % |
| 1.70 | % |
Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements and expense reductions |
|
| 1.92 | %3 |
| 1.80 | % |
| 1.73 | % |
| 1.72 | % |
| 1.73 | % |
| 1.70 | % |
Net investment income |
|
| 0.53 | %3 |
| 0.96 | % |
| 1.25 | % |
| 1.34 | % |
| 1.22 | % |
| 1.15 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate |
|
| 32 | % |
| 60 | % |
| 91 | % |
| 67 | % |
| 77 | % |
| 103 | % |
|
1 | Per share amount is based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
2 | Excluding applicable sales charges |
3 | Annualized |
See Notes to Financial Statements
9
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
CLASS C |
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended March 31, |
| ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| ||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period |
| $ | 4.18 |
| $ | 8.29 |
| $ | 9.35 |
| $ | 8.90 |
| $ | 8.32 |
| $ | 8.21 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Income from investment operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
| 0.01 |
|
| 0.06 |
|
| 0.11 |
|
| 0.12 |
|
| 0.11 |
|
| 0.09 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments |
|
| 1.27 |
|
| (3.34 | ) |
| (0.43 | ) |
| 0.42 |
|
| 0.57 |
|
| 0.13 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
| 1.28 |
|
| (3.28 | ) |
| (0.32 | ) |
| 0.54 |
|
| 0.68 |
|
| 0.22 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to shareholders from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
| (0.01 | ) |
| (0.08 | ) |
| (0.11 | ) |
| (0.09 | ) |
| (0.10 | ) |
| (0.11 | ) |
Net realized gains |
|
| 0 |
|
| (0.75 | ) |
| (0.63 | ) |
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to shareholders |
|
| (0.01 | ) |
| (0.83 | ) |
| (0.74 | ) |
| (0.09 | ) |
| (0.10 | ) |
| (0.11 | ) |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period |
| $ | 5.45 |
| $ | 4.18 |
| $ | 8.29 |
| $ | 9.35 |
| $ | 8.90 |
| $ | 8.32 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total return1 |
|
| 30.71 | % |
| (39.13 | )% |
| (4.03 | )% |
| 6.16 | % |
| 8.26 | % |
| 2.70 | % |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Ratios and supplemental data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets, end of period (millions) |
| $ | 40 |
| $ | 33 |
| $ | 61 |
| $ | 72 |
| $ | 85 |
| $ | 16 |
|
Ratios to average net assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses including waivers/reimbursements but excluding expense reductions |
|
| 1.92 | %2 |
| 1.80 | % |
| 1.69 | % |
| 1.69 | % |
| 1.69 | % |
| 1.70 | % |
Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements and expense reductions |
|
| 1.92 | %2 |
| 1.82 | % |
| 1.73 | % |
| 1.72 | % |
| 1.73 | % |
| 1.70 | % |
Net investment income |
|
| 0.52 | %2 |
| 1.01 | % |
| 1.22 | % |
| 1.34 | % |
| 1.22 | % |
| 1.16 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate |
|
| 32 | % |
| 60 | % |
| 91 | % |
| 67 | % |
| 77 | % |
| 103 | % |
|
1 | Excluding applicable sales charges |
2 | Annualized |
See Notes to Financial Statements
10
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
CLASS I |
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended March 31, |
| ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| ||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period |
| $ | 4.16 |
| $ | 8.25 |
| $ | 9.31 |
| $ | 8.87 |
| $ | 8.27 |
| $ | 8.16 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Income from investment operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
| 0.03 |
|
| 0.13 |
|
| 0.20 |
|
| 0.21 |
|
| 0.19 |
|
| 0.16 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments |
|
| 1.27 |
|
| (3.32 | ) |
| (0.43 | ) |
| 0.42 |
|
| 0.59 |
|
| 0.14 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
| 1.30 |
|
| (3.19 | ) |
| (0.23 | ) |
| 0.63 |
|
| 0.78 |
|
| 0.30 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to shareholders from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
| (0.04 | ) |
| (0.15 | ) |
| (0.20 | ) |
| (0.19 | ) |
| (0.18 | ) |
| (0.19 | ) |
Net realized gains |
|
| 0 |
|
| (0.75 | ) |
| (0.63 | ) |
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to shareholders |
|
| (0.04 | ) |
| (0.90 | ) |
| (0.83 | ) |
| (0.19 | ) |
| (0.18 | ) |
| (0.19 | ) |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period |
| $ | 5.42 |
| $ | 4.16 |
| $ | 8.25 |
| $ | 9.31 |
| $ | 8.87 |
| $ | 8.27 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total return |
|
| 31.24 | % |
| (38.43 | )% |
| (3.08 | )% |
| 7.15 | % |
| 9.47 | % |
| 3.74 | % |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Ratios and supplemental data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets, end of period (millions) |
| $ | 99 |
| $ | 84 |
| $ | 169 |
| $ | 204 |
| $ | 267 |
| $ | 136 |
|
Ratios to average net assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses including waivers/reimbursements but excluding expense reductions |
|
| 0.92 | %1 |
| 0.79 | % |
| 0.69 | % |
| 0.69 | % |
| 0.69 | % |
| 0.70 | % |
Expenses excluding waivers/reimbursements and expense reductions |
|
| 0.92 | %1 |
| 0.81 | % |
| 0.73 | % |
| 0.72 | % |
| 0.73 | % |
| 0.70 | % |
Net investment income |
|
| 1.52 | %1 |
| 1.99 | % |
| 2.22 | % |
| 2.33 | % |
| 2.21 | % |
| 2.13 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate |
|
| 32 | % |
| 60 | % |
| 91 | % |
| 67 | % |
| 77 | % |
| 103 | % |
|
1 | Annualized |
See Notes to Financial Statements
11
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
September 30, 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
| Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Amount |
|
| Value |
|
| |||||||
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Beach Asset Holdings Corp. NIM Trust, Ser. 2006-2, Class N2, 7.63%, 04/25/2046 • o + 144A |
| $ | 1,000,000 |
| $ | 0 |
|
Telos CLO, Ltd., Ser. 2006-1A, Class E, FRN, 4.76%, 10/11/2021 144A |
|
| 1,000,000 |
|
| 137,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Asset-Backed Securities (cost $1,997,516) |
|
|
|
|
| 137,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED-RATE 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GS Mtge. Securities Corp., Ser. 2007-NIM1, Class N2, 8.00%, 08/25/2046 o + 144A |
|
| 1,340,420 |
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
FLOATING-RATE 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured Adjustable Rate Mtge. Loan Pass-Through Cert., Ser. 2005-9, Class B8, 1.75%, 05/25/2035 |
|
| 1,519,588 |
|
| 16,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $2,803,111) |
|
|
|
|
| 16,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CORPORATE BONDS 11.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIALS 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Finance 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qwest Capital Funding, Inc., 6.50%, 11/15/2018 |
|
| 250,000 |
|
| 206,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
INDUSTRIALS 9.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Equipment 5.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baldor Electric Co., 8.625%, 02/15/2017 |
|
| 19,500,000 |
|
| 19,890,000 |
|
Belden, Inc., 7.00%, 03/15/2017 |
|
| 1,750,000 |
|
| 1,673,438 |
|
General Cable Corp., 7.125%, 04/01/2017 ρ |
|
| 9,000,000 |
|
| 8,865,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 30,428,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Machinery 4.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuant Corp., 6.875%, 06/15/2017 |
|
| 18,450,000 |
|
| 17,250,750 |
|
SPX Corp., 7.625%, 12/15/2014 |
|
| 7,550,000 |
|
| 7,644,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 24,895,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
MATERIALS 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals & Mining 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steel Dynamics, Inc., 8.25%, 04/15/2016 144A |
|
| 4,600,000 |
|
| 4,646,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
UTILITIES 2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities 2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Energy, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.375%, 02/01/2016 |
|
| 11,000,000 |
|
| 10,670,000 |
|
7.375%, 01/15/2017 |
|
| 1,800,000 |
|
| 1,746,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 12,416,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Corporate Bonds (cost $73,099,476) |
|
|
|
|
| 72,592,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
WHOLE LOAN MORTGAGE-BACKED COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED-RATE 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harborview NIM Corp., Ser. 2006-12, Class N2, 8.35%, 12/19/2036 • o + 144A (cost $899,933) |
|
| 899,934 |
|
| 7,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
12
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued
September 30, 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
| Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Amount |
|
| Value |
|
| |||||||
WHOLE LOAN SUBORDINATE COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED-RATE 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banc of America Mtge. Securities, Inc., Ser. 2003-7, Class B-5, 4.75%, 09/25/2018 |
| $ | 96,459 |
| $ | 24,924 |
|
Chase Mtge. Fin. Corp., Ser. 2003-S12: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B-3, 4.89%, 12/25/2018 |
|
| 196,784 |
|
| 21,680 |
|
Class B-4, 4.89%, 12/26/2018 |
|
| 98,392 |
|
| 7,530 |
|
Class B-5, 4.89%, 12/25/2018 |
|
| 197,259 |
|
| 7,415 |
|
Residential Funding Securities Corp., Ser. 2003-RM2, Class B3-2, 6.00%, 05/25/2033 |
|
| 291,983 |
|
| 122,016 |
|
Wells Fargo Mtge. Backed Securities Trust, Ser. 2006-16, Class B4, 5.00%, 11/25/2036 |
|
| 1,436,213 |
|
| 21,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 205,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
FLOATING-RATE 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banc of America Mtge. Securities, Inc., Ser. 2002-E, Class B-4, 3.92%, 06/20/2031 |
|
| 182,043 |
|
| 17,736 |
|
Cendant Mtge. Corp., Ser. 2005, Class B-4, 5.44%, 02/18/2035 |
|
| 170,796 |
|
| 25,736 |
|
Harborview Mtge. Loan Trust, Ser. 2004-7, Class B4, 3.61%, 11/19/2034 |
|
| 567,703 |
|
| 9,992 |
|
MASTR Reperforming Loan Trust, Ser. 2006-2, Class B4, 5.79%, 05/25/2036 |
|
| 249,620 |
|
| 21,590 |
|
Merrill Lynch Mtge. Investors, Inc., Ser. 2003-A2, Class 2B2, 5.06%, 03/25/2033 |
|
| 318,742 |
|
| 44,018 |
|
PHH Mtge. Capital, LLC Mtge. Pass Through Certs.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ser. 2005-4, Class B4, 5.62%, 07/18/2035 |
|
| 253,656 |
|
| 22,020 |
|
Ser. 2005-5, Class B4, 5.53%, 08/18/2035 |
|
| 317,382 |
|
| 43,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 184,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Whole Loan Subordinate Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (cost $3,757,577) |
|
|
|
|
| 390,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
YANKEE OBLIGATIONS – CORPORATE 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIALS 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Term Securities XII, Ltd., FRN, 1.91%, 12/24/2033 + |
|
| 1,000,000 |
|
| 9,090 |
|
Preferred Term Securities XIII, Ltd., FRN, 1.86%, 03/24/2034 + |
|
| 1,000,000 |
|
| 8,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Yankee Obligations – Corporate (cost $1,342,966) |
|
|
|
|
| 17,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
| Shares |
|
| Value |
|
| |||||||
COMMON STOCKS 84.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSUMER STAPLES 2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Household Products 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Church & Dwight Co. |
|
| 155,000 |
|
| 8,794,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Personal Products 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estee Lauder Cos., Class A |
|
| 100,000 |
|
| 3,708,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
13
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued
September 30, 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shares |
|
| Value |
|
| |||||||
COMMON STOCKS continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ENERGY 20.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Equipment & Services 4.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cameron International Corp. * |
|
| 190,000 |
| $ | 7,185,800 |
|
Halliburton Co. |
|
| 50,001 |
|
| 1,356,027 |
|
National Oilwell Varco, Inc. * |
|
| 140,000 |
|
| 6,038,200 |
|
Noble Corp. |
|
| 195,000 |
|
| 7,402,200 |
|
Pride International, Inc. * |
|
| 200,000 |
|
| 6,088,000 |
|
Schlumberger, Ltd. |
|
| 10,000 |
|
| 596,000 |
|
Transocean, Ltd. * |
|
| 5,000 |
|
| 427,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 29,093,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 16.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. * |
|
| 195,120 |
|
| 6,848,712 |
|
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. ρ |
|
| 230,000 |
|
| 14,427,900 |
|
Apache Corp. |
|
| 15,000 |
|
| 1,377,450 |
|
Consol Energy, Inc. |
|
| 160,000 |
|
| 7,217,600 |
|
Devon Energy Corp. |
|
| 30,000 |
|
| 2,019,900 |
|
EnCana Corp. |
|
| 455,000 |
|
| 26,212,550 |
|
EOG Resources, Inc. |
|
| 15,000 |
|
| 1,252,650 |
|
Hess Corp. |
|
| 30,000 |
|
| 1,603,800 |
|
Marathon Oil Corp. |
|
| 5,000 |
|
| 159,500 |
|
Massey Energy Co. |
|
| 130,000 |
|
| 3,625,700 |
|
Occidental Petroleum Corp. |
|
| 190,000 |
|
| 14,896,000 |
|
Patriot Coal Corp. * ρ |
|
| 300,000 |
|
| 3,528,000 |
|
Peabody Energy Corp. |
|
| 200,000 |
|
| 7,444,000 |
|
Suncor Energy, Inc. |
|
| 180,000 |
|
| 6,220,800 |
|
XTO Energy, Inc. |
|
| 40,001 |
|
| 1,652,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 98,487,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
FINANCIALS 14.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets 5.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank of New York Mellon Corp. |
|
| 540,000 |
|
| 15,654,600 |
|
Northern Trust Corp. |
|
| 260,000 |
|
| 15,121,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 30,776,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial Banks 7.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. ρ |
|
| 485,000 |
|
| 23,566,150 |
|
U.S. Bancorp ρ |
|
| 1,130,000 |
|
| 24,701,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 48,267,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Diversified Financial Services 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank of America Corp. |
|
| 550,000 |
|
| 9,306,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saul Centers, Inc. |
|
| 20,000 |
|
| 642,000 |
|
Washington Real Estate Investment Trust |
|
| 40,000 |
|
| 1,152,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,794,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
14
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued
September 30, 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
| Shares |
|
| Value |
|
| |||||||
COMMON STOCKS continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEALTH CARE 14.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biotechnology 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gen-Probe, Inc. * |
|
| 150,000 |
| $ | 6,216,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies 5.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baxter International, Inc. |
|
| 400,000 |
|
| 22,804,000 |
|
St. Jude Medical, Inc. * |
|
| 310,000 |
|
| 12,093,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 34,897,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Health Care Providers & Services 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owens & Minor, Inc. |
|
| 110,000 |
|
| 4,977,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Life Sciences Tools & Services 6.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Class A * |
|
| 92,000 |
|
| 8,452,960 |
|
Covance, Inc. * |
|
| 100,000 |
|
| 5,415,000 |
|
Illumina, Inc. * ρ |
|
| 100,000 |
|
| 4,250,000 |
|
Life Technologies Corp. * |
|
| 10,000 |
|
| 465,500 |
|
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. * |
|
| 517,000 |
|
| 22,577,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 41,160,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
INDUSTRIALS 8.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace & Defense 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Esterline Technologies Corp. * |
|
| 50,000 |
|
| 1,960,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Electrical Equipment 2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ametek, Inc. |
|
| 65,000 |
|
| 2,269,150 |
|
Emerson Electric Co. |
|
| 210,000 |
|
| 8,416,800 |
|
General Cable Corp. * |
|
| 40,000 |
|
| 1,566,000 |
|
Roper Industries, Inc. |
|
| 60,000 |
|
| 3,058,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 15,310,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Machinery 5.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bucyrus International, Inc. |
|
| 40,000 |
|
| 1,424,800 |
|
Donaldson Co., Inc. |
|
| 140,000 |
|
| 4,848,200 |
|
Flowserve Corp. |
|
| 170,000 |
|
| 16,751,800 |
|
IDEX Corp. |
|
| 50,000 |
|
| 1,397,500 |
|
Joy Global, Inc. |
|
| 140,000 |
|
| 6,851,600 |
|
SPX Corp. |
|
| 40,000 |
|
| 2,450,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 33,724,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components 2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amphenol Corp., Class A |
|
| 365,000 |
|
| 13,753,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
MATERIALS 14.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemicals 6.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMC Corp. |
|
| 330,000 |
|
| 18,562,500 |
|
Monsanto Co. |
|
| 230,000 |
|
| 17,802,000 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
15
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued
September 30, 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
| Shares |
|
| Value |
|
| |||||||
COMMON STOCKS continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MATERIALS continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemicals continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Praxair, Inc. |
|
| 55,000 |
| $ | 4,492,950 |
|
Sigma-Aldrich Corp. |
|
| 20,000 |
|
| 1,079,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 41,937,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Containers & Packaging 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greif, Inc., Class A |
|
| 60,000 |
|
| 3,303,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Metals & Mining 6.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barrick Gold Corp. |
|
| 115,000 |
|
| 4,358,500 |
|
Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc. |
|
| 220,000 |
|
| 7,119,200 |
|
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. |
|
| 365,000 |
|
| 25,042,650 |
|
Nucor Corp. |
|
| 65,000 |
|
| 3,055,650 |
|
Steel Dynamics, Inc. |
|
| 170,000 |
|
| 2,607,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 42,183,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES 2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Telecommunication Services 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Crossing, Ltd. * |
|
| 249,700 |
|
| 3,570,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Wireless Telecommunication Services 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Tower Corp., Class A * |
|
| 230,000 |
|
| 8,372,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
UTILITIES 5.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities 2.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Energy, Inc. * |
|
| 600,000 |
|
| 16,914,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Gas Utilities 2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Fuel Gas Co. |
|
| 10,000 |
|
| 458,100 |
|
Questar Corp. |
|
| 360,000 |
|
| 13,521,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 13,979,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Common Stocks (cost $580,763,631) |
|
|
|
|
| 512,488,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
| Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Amount |
|
| Value |
|
| |||||||
CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES 3.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ENERGY 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patriot Coal Corp., 3.25%, 05/31/2013 |
| $ | 6,100,000 |
|
| 4,735,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
INDUSTRIALS 3.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Equipment 3.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Cable Corp., 1.00%, 10/15/2012 |
|
| 22,600,000 |
|
| 19,436,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Convertible Debentures (cost $27,308,518) |
|
|
|
|
| 24,171,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
16
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued
September 30, 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
| Shares |
|
| Value |
|
| |||||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS 9.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MUTUAL FUND SHARES 9.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BGI Prime Money Market Fund, Premium Shares, 0.19% q ρρ |
|
| 4,516 |
| $ | 4,516 |
|
BlackRock Liquidity TempFund, Institutional Class, 0.22% q ρρ |
|
| 13,340,411 |
|
| 13,340,411 |
|
Evergreen Institutional Money Market Fund, Class I, 0.13% q ø ρρ |
|
| 43,777,645 |
|
| 43,777,645 |
|
Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Fund Money Market Portfolio, Institutional Class, 0.16% q ρρ |
|
| 1,990,349 |
|
| 1,990,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Short-Term Investments (cost $59,112,921) |
|
|
|
|
| 59,112,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Investments (cost $751,085,649) 109.7% |
|
|
|
|
| 668,934,747 |
|
Other Assets and Liabilities (9.7%) |
|
|
|
|
| (59,391,160 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Assets 100.0% |
|
|
|
| $ | 609,543,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144A | Security that may be sold to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. This security has been determined to be liquid under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees, unless otherwise noted. |
+ | Security is deemed illiquid. |
o | Security is valued at fair value as determined by the investment advisor in good faith, according to procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
• | Security which has defaulted on payment of interest and/or principal. The Fund has stopped accruing interest on this security. |
ρ | All or a portion of this security is on loan. |
* | Non-income producing security |
q | Rate shown is the 7-day annualized yield at period end. |
ρρ | All or a portion of this security represents investment of cash collateral received from securities on loan. |
ø | Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC is the investment advisor to both the Fund and the money market fund. |
Summary of Abbreviations | |
CLO | Collateralized Loan Obligation |
FRN | Floating Rate Note |
MASTR | Mortgage Asset Securitization Transactions, Inc. |
NIM | Net Interest Margin |
The following table shows portfolio composition as a percent of total investments as of September 30, 2009:
Energy |
| 19.7 | % |
Industrials |
| 18.8 | % |
Materials |
| 13.8 | % |
Financials |
| 13.5 | % |
Health Care |
| 13.0 | % |
Utilities |
| 6.5 | % |
Information Technology |
| 2.1 | % |
Consumer Staples |
| 1.9 | % |
Telecommunication Services |
| 1.8 | % |
Mortgage-Backed Securities |
| 0.1 | % |
Cash Equivalents |
| 8.8 | % |
|
|
| |
|
| 100.0 | % |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
17
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS continued
September 30, 2009 (unaudited)
The following table shows the percent of total bonds by credit quality based on Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s ratings as of September 30, 2009:
AAA |
| 0.1 | % |
BB |
| 43.8 | % |
B |
| 51.2 | % |
NR |
| 4.9 | % |
|
|
| |
|
| 100.0 | % |
|
|
|
The following table shows the percent of total bonds based on effective maturity as of September 30, 2009:
Less than 1 year |
| 0.1 | % |
3 to 5 years |
| 24.9 | % |
5 to 10 years |
| 74.8 | % |
10 to 20 years |
| 0.2 | % |
|
|
| |
|
| 100.0 | % |
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
18
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
September 30, 2009 (unaudited)
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Investments in unaffiliated issuers, at value (cost $707,308,004) including $57,205,862 of securities loaned |
| $ | 625,157,102 |
|
Investments in affiliated issuers, at value (cost $43,777,645) |
|
| 43,777,645 |
|
| ||||
Total investments |
|
| 668,934,747 |
|
Segregated cash |
|
| 11,703 |
|
Principal paydown receivable |
|
| 3,544 |
|
Receivable for Fund shares sold |
|
| 345,279 |
|
Dividends and interest receivable |
|
| 2,280,419 |
|
Receivable for securities lending income |
|
| 6,258 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
| 105,835 |
|
| ||||
Total assets |
|
| 671,687,785 |
|
| ||||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Payable for securities purchased |
|
| 1,615,170 |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed |
|
| 702,642 |
|
Payable for securities on loan |
|
| 59,124,624 |
|
Due to custodian bank |
|
| 437,178 |
|
Advisory fee payable |
|
| 6,912 |
|
Distribution Plan expenses payable |
|
| 4,721 |
|
Due to other related parties |
|
| 3,093 |
|
Trustees’ fees and expenses payable |
|
| 185,139 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
| 64,719 |
|
| ||||
Total liabilities |
|
| 62,144,198 |
|
| ||||
Net assets |
| $ | 609,543,587 |
|
| ||||
Net assets represented by |
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital |
| $ | 873,391,111 |
|
Overdistributed net investment income |
|
| (192,815 | ) |
Accumulated net realized losses on investments |
|
| (181,503,807 | ) |
Net unrealized losses on investments |
|
| (82,150,902 | ) |
| ||||
Total net assets |
| $ | 609,543,587 |
|
| ||||
Net assets consists of |
|
|
|
|
Class A |
| $ | 451,697,829 |
|
Class B |
|
| 18,436,715 |
|
Class C |
|
| 40,354,210 |
|
Class I |
|
| 99,054,833 |
|
| ||||
Total net assets |
| $ | 609,543,587 |
|
| ||||
Shares outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized) |
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
| 82,894,711 |
|
Class B |
|
| 3,367,051 |
|
Class C |
|
| 7,401,722 |
|
Class I |
|
| 18,260,343 |
|
| ||||
Net asset value per share |
|
|
|
|
Class A |
| $ | 5.45 |
|
Class A — Offering price (based on sales charge of 5.75%) |
| $ | 5.78 |
|
Class B |
| $ | 5.48 |
|
Class C |
| $ | 5.45 |
|
Class I |
| $ | 5.42 |
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
19
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 (unaudited)
Investment income |
|
|
|
|
Interest |
| $ | 4,787,306 |
|
Dividends (net of foreign withholding taxes of $24,427) |
|
| 2,020,671 |
|
Securities lending |
|
| 36,073 |
|
Income from affiliated issuers |
|
| 4,869 |
|
| ||||
Total investment income |
|
| 6,848,919 |
|
| ||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
Advisory fee |
|
| 1,191,374 |
|
Distribution Plan expenses |
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
| 517,022 |
|
Class B |
|
| 91,736 |
|
Class C |
|
| 186,956 |
|
Administrative services fee |
|
| 280,322 |
|
Transfer agent fees |
|
| 893,653 |
|
Trustees’ fees and expenses |
|
| 6,205 |
|
Printing and postage expenses |
|
| 85,315 |
|
Custodian and accounting fees |
|
| 72,574 |
|
Registration and filing fees |
|
| 22,906 |
|
Professional fees |
|
| 29,221 |
|
Other |
|
| 8,002 |
|
| ||||
Total expenses |
|
| 3,385,286 |
|
Less: Expense reductions |
|
| (52 | ) |
| ||||
Net expenses |
|
| 3,385,234 |
|
| ||||
Net investment income |
|
| 3,463,685 |
|
| ||||
Net realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments |
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains or losses on: |
|
|
|
|
Securities in unaffiliated issuers |
|
| (41,034,623 | ) |
Foreign currency related transactions |
|
| 52 |
|
| ||||
Net realized losses on investments |
|
| (41,034,571 | ) |
| ||||
Net change in unrealized gains or losses on: |
|
|
|
|
Securities in unaffiliated issuers |
|
| 187,898,722 |
|
Foreign currency related transactions |
|
| 111 |
|
| ||||
Net change in unrealized gains or losses on investments |
|
| 187,898,833 |
|
| ||||
Net realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments |
|
| 146,864,262 |
|
| ||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
| $ | 150,327,947 |
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
20
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| ||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
| $ | 3,463,685 |
|
|
|
| $ | 13,292,417 |
|
Net realized losses on investments |
|
|
|
|
| (41,034,571 | ) |
|
|
|
| (120,515,013 | ) |
Net change in unrealized gains or losses on investments |
|
|
|
|
| 187,898,833 |
|
|
|
|
| (257,170,202 | ) |
| |||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
|
|
|
|
| 150,327,947 |
|
|
|
|
| (364,392,798 | ) |
| |||||||||||||
Distributions to shareholders from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
|
|
| (2,637,466 | ) |
|
|
|
| (11,705,876 | ) |
Class B |
|
|
|
|
| (47,729 | ) |
|
|
|
| (416,902 | ) |
Class C |
|
|
|
|
| (99,052 | ) |
|
|
|
| (647,189 | ) |
Class I |
|
|
|
|
| (677,602 | ) |
|
|
|
| (3,007,083 | ) |
Net realized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
| (60,375,775 | ) |
Class B |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
| (3,301,688 | ) |
Class C |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
| (5,267,261 | ) |
Class I |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
| (14,099,456 | ) |
| |||||||||||||
Total distributions to shareholders |
|
|
|
|
| (3,461,849 | ) |
|
|
|
| (98,821,230 | ) |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
| Shares |
|
|
|
|
| Shares |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Capital share transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
| 569,503 |
|
| 3,091,023 |
|
| 2,674,414 |
|
| 15,601,928 |
|
Class B |
|
| 148,699 |
|
| 786,955 |
|
| 535,739 |
|
| 3,435,033 |
|
Class C |
|
| 291,858 |
|
| 1,421,821 |
|
| 2,586,520 |
|
| 12,751,449 |
|
Class I |
|
| 630,308 |
|
| 3,188,607 |
|
| 1,326,811 |
|
| 7,476,963 |
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| 8,488,406 |
|
|
|
|
| 39,265,373 |
|
| |||||||||||||
Net asset value of shares issued in reinvestment of distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
| 462,091 |
|
| 2,360,861 |
|
| 15,881,763 |
|
| 66,161,672 |
|
Class B |
|
| 8,498 |
|
| 42,883 |
|
| 836,186 |
|
| 3,432,593 |
|
Class C |
|
| 17,157 |
|
| 86,577 |
|
| 1,297,797 |
|
| 5,304,806 |
|
Class I |
|
| 112,242 |
|
| 571,892 |
|
| 3,484,680 |
|
| 14,524,699 |
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| 3,062,213 |
|
|
|
|
| 89,423,770 |
|
| |||||||||||||
Automatic conversion of Class B shares to Class A shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
| 552,436 |
|
| 2,623,533 |
|
| 1,555,401 |
|
| 10,931,287 |
|
Class B |
|
| (552,203 | ) |
| (2,623,533 | ) |
| (1,555,636 | ) |
| (10,931,287 | ) |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
|
| |||||||||||||
Payment for shares redeemed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
| (6,371,247 | ) |
| (30,734,696 | ) |
| (21,967,231 | ) |
| (130,140,289 | ) |
Class B |
|
| (566,189 | ) |
| (2,721,815 | ) |
| (1,861,198 | ) |
| (11,655,730 | ) |
Class C |
|
| (819,329 | ) |
| (3,984,006 | ) |
| (3,338,075 | ) |
| (17,332,826 | ) |
Class I |
|
| (2,684,545 | ) |
| (12,903,391 | ) |
| (5,071,264 | ) |
| (29,183,676 | ) |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| (50,343,908 | ) |
|
|
|
| (188,312,521 | ) |
| |||||||||||||
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital share transactions |
|
|
|
|
| (38,793,289 | ) |
|
|
|
| (59,623,378 | ) |
| |||||||||||||
Total increase (decrease) in net assets |
|
|
|
|
| 108,072,809 |
|
|
|
|
| (522,837,406 | ) |
Net assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
| 501,470,778 |
|
|
|
|
| 1,024,308,184 |
|
| |||||||||||||
End of period |
|
|
|
| $ | 609,543,587 |
|
|
|
| $ | 501,470,778 |
|
| |||||||||||||
Overdistributed net investment income |
|
|
|
| $ | (192,815 | ) |
|
|
| $ | (194,651 | ) |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
21
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
1. ORGANIZATION
Evergreen Diversified Capital Builder Fund (the “Fund”) is a diversified series of Evergreen Equity Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on September 18, 1997. The Trust is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).
The Fund offers Class A, Class B, Class C and Class I shares. Class A shares are sold with a front-end sales charge. However, Class A share investments of $1 million or more are not subject to a front-end sales charge, but are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge of 1.00% upon redemption within 18 months. Effective after the close of business on June 30, 2009, Class B shares were closed to new accounts and additional purchases by existing shareholders. Class B shares are available for purchase only through (i) an exchange transaction in which Class B shares of another Evergreen fund are exchanged or (ii) the Fund’s dividend reinvestment program. Class B shares are sold without a front-end sales charge, but are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge that is payable upon redemption and decreases depending on how long the shares have been held. Class C shares are sold without a front-end sales charge, but are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge that is payable upon redemption within one year. Class I shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge. Each class of shares, except Class I shares, pays an ongoing distribution fee.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported herein. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Management has considered the circumstances under which the Fund should recognize or make disclosures regarding events or transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date through November 24, 2009 which represents the date the financial statements are issued. Adjustments or additional disclosures, if any, have been included in these financial statements.
a. Valuation of investments
Listed equity securities are usually valued at the last sales price or official closing price on the national securities exchange where the securities are principally traded. If there has been no sale, the securities are valued at the mean between bid and asked prices.
Foreign securities traded on an established exchange are valued at the last sales price on the exchange where the security is primarily traded. If there has been no sale, the securities are valued at the mean between bid and asked prices. Foreign securities may be valued at fair value according to procedures approved by the Board of Trustees if the closing price is not reflective of current market values due to trading or events occurring in the foreign markets between the close of the established exchange and the valuation time of the Fund.
22
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) continued
In addition, substantial changes in values in the U.S. markets subsequent to the close of a foreign market may also affect the values of securities traded in the foreign market. The value of foreign securities may be adjusted if such movements in the U.S. market exceed a specified threshold.
Portfolio debt securities acquired with more than 60 days to maturity are fair valued using matrix pricing methods determined by an independent pricing service which takes into consideration such factors as similar security prices, yields, maturities, liquidity and ratings. Securities for which valuations are not readily available from an independent pricing service may be valued by brokers which use prices provided by market makers or estimates of fair market value obtained from yield data relating to investments or securities with similar characteristics.
Short-term securities of sufficient credit quality with remaining maturities of 60 days or less at the time of purchase are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Investments in open-end mutual funds are valued at net asset value. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or not reflective of current fair value are valued at fair value as determined by the investment advisor in good faith, according to procedures approved by the Board of Trustees.
The valuation techniques used by the Fund to measure fair value are consistent with the market approach, income approach and/or cost approach, where applicable, for each security type.
b. Foreign currency translation
All assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts at the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of portfolio securities and income items denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts on the respective dates of such transactions. The Fund does not separately account for that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments and the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments.
c. When-issued and delayed delivery transactions
The Fund records when-issued or delayed delivery securities as of trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked-to-market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.
23
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) continued
d. Securities lending
The Fund may lend its securities to certain qualified brokers in order to earn additional income. The Fund receives compensation in the form of fees or interest earned on the investment of any cash collateral received. The Fund also continues to receive interest and dividends on the securities loaned. The Fund receives collateral in the form of cash or securities with a market value at least equal to the market value of the securities on loan, including accrued interest. In the event of default or bankruptcy by the borrower, the Fund could experience delays and costs in recovering the loaned securities or in gaining access to the collateral. In addition, the investment of any cash collateral received may lose all or part of its value. The Fund has the right under the lending agreement to recover the securities from the borrower on demand.
e. Security transactions and investment income
Security transactions are recorded on trade date. Realized gains and losses are computed using the specific cost of the security sold. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums. To the extent debt obligations are placed on non-accrual status, any related interest income may be reduced by writing off interest receivables when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful based on consistently applied procedures. If the issuer subsequently resumes interest payments or when the collectibility of interest is reasonably assured, the debt obligation is removed from non-accrual status. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or in the case of some foreign securities, on the date when the Fund is made aware of the dividend. Foreign income and capital gains realized on some securities may be subject to foreign taxes, which are accrued as applicable.
f. Federal and other taxes
The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income, including any net capital gains (which have already been offset by available capital loss carryovers). Accordingly, no provision for federal taxes is required. The Fund’s income and excise tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal, Massachusetts and Delaware revenue authorities.
g. Distributions
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Such distributions are determined in conformity with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles.
h. Class allocations
Income, common expenses and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated to the classes based on the relative net assets of each class. Distribution fees, if any, are calculated daily at the class level based on the appropriate net assets of each class and the specific expense rates applicable to each class.
24
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) continued
3. ADVISORY FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (“EIMC”), a subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”), is the investment advisor to the Fund and is paid a fee at an annual rate of 1.50% of the Fund’s gross investment income plus an amount determined by applying percentage rates to the aggregate average daily net assets of the Fund and its variable annuity counterpart, Evergreen VA Diversified Capital Builder Fund, starting at 0.41% and declining to 0.21% as the aggregate average daily net assets increase. For the six months ended September 30, 2009, the advisory fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.43% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
The Fund may invest in money market funds which are advised by EIMC. Income earned on these investments is included in income from affiliated issuers on the Statement of Operations.
EIMC also serves as the administrator to the Fund providing the Fund with facilities, equipment and personnel. EIMC is paid an annual rate determined by applying percentage rates to the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen funds (excluding money market funds) starting at 0.10% and declining to 0.05% as the aggregate average daily net assets of the Evergreen funds (excluding money market funds) increase. For the six months ended September 30, 2009, the administrative services fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.10% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Evergreen Service Company, LLC (“ESC”), an affiliate of EIMC and a subsidiary of Wells Fargo, is the transfer and dividend disbursing agent for the Fund. ESC receives account fees that vary based on the type of account held by the shareholders in the Fund. For the six months ended September 30, 2009, the transfer agent fees were equivalent to an annual rate of 0.32% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Wachovia Bank NA, a subsidiary of Wells Fargo and an affiliate of EIMC, through its securities lending division, Wachovia Global Securities Lending, acts as the securities lending agent for the Fund (see Note 5).
The Fund has placed a portion of its portfolio transactions with brokerage firms that are affiliates of Wells Fargo. During the six months ended September 30, 2009, the Fund paid brokerage commissions of $15,885 to broker-dealers affiliated with Wells Fargo.
4. DISTRIBUTION PLANS
Evergreen Investment Services (“EIS”), an affiliate of EIMC and a subsidiary of Wells Fargo, serves as distributor of the Fund’s shares. The Fund has adopted Distribution Plans, as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act, for each class of shares, except Class I. Under the Distribution Plans, the Fund is permitted to pay distribution fees at an annual rate of up to 0.75% of the average daily net assets for Class A shares and up to 1.00% of the average daily net assets for each of Class B and Class C shares. However, currently the
25
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) continued
distribution fees for Class A shares are limited to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the class.
For the six months ended September 30, 2009, EIS received $3,831 from the sale of Class A shares and $49, $13,139 and $155 in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class A, Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5. INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
Cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities (excluding short-term securities) were $178,202,158 and $176,009,356, respectively, for the six months ended September 30, 2009.
Fair value measurements are determined within a framework that has established a fair value hierarchy based upon the various data inputs utilized in determining the value of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
As of September 30, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Fund���s assets, which are carried at fair value, were as follows:
|
|
|
| Significant |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
| Other |
| Significant |
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
| Observable |
| Unobservable |
|
| ||||||||
|
| Quoted Prices |
| Inputs |
| Inputs |
|
| ||||||||
Investments in Securities |
| (Level 1) |
| (Level 2) |
| (Level 3) |
| Total | ||||||||
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stocks |
| $ | 512,488,991 |
|
| $ | 0 |
|
| $ | 0 |
|
| $ | 512,488,991 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
| 0 |
|
|
| 137,840 |
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
| 137,840 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
| 0 |
|
|
| 406,753 |
|
|
| 7,019 |
|
|
| 413,772 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
| 0 |
|
|
| 96,781,223 |
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
| 96,781,223 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
| 59,112,921 |
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
| 59,112,921 |
|
Total |
| $ | 571,601,912 |
|
| $ | 97,325,816 |
|
| $ | 7,019 |
|
| $ | 668,934,747 |
|
Further details on the major security types listed above can be found in the Schedule of Investments.
26
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) continued
The following is a reconciliation of assets in which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were used in determining fair value:
|
| Mortgage-backed |
| ||
| |||||
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
| $ | 18,629 |
|
|
Realized gains or losses |
|
| 0 |
|
|
Change in unrealized gains or losses |
|
| (11,610 | ) |
|
Net purchases (sales) |
|
| 0 |
|
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
| 0 |
|
|
| |||||
Balance as of September 30, 2009 |
| $ | 7,019 |
|
|
| |||||
Change in unrealized loss included in earnings relating to securities still held at September 30, 2009 |
| $ | (11,610 | ) |
|
|
During the six months ended September 30, 2009, the Fund loaned securities to certain brokers and earned $36,073, net of $4,406 paid to Wachovia Global Securities Lending as the securities lending agent. At September 30, 2009, the value of securities on loan and the total value of collateral received for securities loaned (including segregated cash) amounted to $57,205,862 and $59,124,624 respectively.
On September 30, 2009, the aggregate cost of securities for federal income tax purposes was $751,085,649. The gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation on securities based on tax cost was $28,717,662 and $110,868,564, respectively, with a net unrealized depreciation of $82,150,902.
As of March 31, 2009, the Fund had $29,569,654 in capital loss carryovers for federal income tax purposes with $15,320,915 expiring in 2010, $5,016,277 expiring in 2011 and $9,232,462 expiring in 2017. These losses are subject to certain limitations prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code.
For income tax purposes, capital losses incurred after October 31 within the Fund’s fiscal year are deemed to arise on the first business day of the following fiscal year. As of March 31, 2009, the Fund incurred and elected to defer post-October losses of $110,864,056.
6. INTERFUND LENDING
Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the SEC, the Fund may participate in an interfund lending program with certain funds in the Evergreen fund family. This program allows the Fund to borrow from, or lend money to, other participating funds. During the six months ended September 30, 2009, the Fund did not participate in the interfund lending program.
7. EXPENSE REDUCTIONS
Through expense offset arrangements with ESC and the Fund’s custodian, a portion of fund expenses has been reduced.
27
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) continued
8. DEFERRED TRUSTEES’ FEES
Each Trustee of the Fund may defer any or all compensation related to performance of his or her duties as a Trustee. The Trustees’ deferred balances are allocated to deferral accounts, which are included in the accrued expenses for the Fund. The investment performance of the deferral accounts is based on the investment performance of certain Evergreen funds. Any gains earned or losses incurred in the deferral accounts are reported in the Fund’s Trustees’ fees and expenses. At the election of the Trustees, the deferral account will be paid either in one lump sum or in quarterly installments for up to ten years.
9. FINANCING AGREEMENT
The Fund and certain other Evergreen funds share in a $100 million unsecured revolving credit commitment for temporary and emergency purposes, including the funding of redemptions, as permitted by each participating fund’s borrowing restrictions. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at the higher of the Federal Funds rate plus 1.25% or LIBOR plus 1.25%. Prior to June 26, 2009, the interest rate was 0.50% per annum above the Federal Funds rate. All of the participating funds are charged an annual commitment fee of 0.145% on the unused balance, which is allocated pro rata. Prior to June 26, 2009, the annual commitment fee was 0.09%. During the six months ended September 30, 2009, the Fund had no borrowings.
10. REGULATORY MATTERS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Evergreen funds, EIMC and certain of EIMC’s affiliates are involved in various legal actions, including private litigation and class action lawsuits, and are and may in the future be subject to regulatory inquiries and investigations.
EIMC and EIS have reached final settlements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Securities Division of the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (“Commonwealth”) primarily relating to the liquidation of Evergreen Ultra Short Opportunities Fund (“Ultra Short Fund”). The claims settled include the following: first, that during the period February 2007 through Ultra Short Fund’s liquidation on June 18, 2008, Ultra Short Fund’s former portfolio management team failed to properly take into account readily-available information in valuing certain non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities held by the Ultra Short Fund, resulting in the Ultra Short Fund’s net asset value (“NAV”) being overstated during the period; second, that EIMC and EIS acted inappropriately when, in an effort to explain the decline in Ultra Short Fund’s NAV, certain information regarding the decline was communicated to some, but not all, shareholders and financial intermediaries; third, that the Ultra Short Fund portfolio management team did not adhere to regulatory requirements for affiliated cross trades in executing trades with other Evergreen funds; and finally, that from at least September 2007 to August 2008, EIS did not preserve certain text and instant messages transmitted via personal digital assistant devices. In settling these matters, EIMC and EIS
28
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) continued
have agreed to payments totaling $41,125,000, up to $40,125,000 of which will be distributed to eligible shareholders of Ultra Short Fund pursuant to a methodology and plan approved by the regulators. EIMC and EIS neither admitted nor denied the regulators’ conclusions.
Three purported class actions have also been filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts relating to the same events; defendants include various Evergreen entities, including EIMC and EIS, and Evergreen Fixed Income Trust and its Trustees. The cases generally allege that investors in the Ultra Short Fund suffered losses as a result of (i) misleading statements in Ultra Short Fund’s registration statement and prospectus, (ii) the failure to accurately price securities in the Ultra Short Fund at different points in time and (iii) the failure of the Ultra Short Fund’s risk disclosures and description of its investment strategy to inform investors adequately of the actual risks of the fund.
EIMC does not expect that any of the legal actions, inquiries or settlement of regulatory matters will have a material adverse impact on the financial position or operations of the Fund to which these financial statements relate. Any publicity surrounding or resulting from any legal actions or regulatory inquiries involving EIMC or its affiliates or any of the Evergreen Funds could result in reduced sales or increased redemptions of Evergreen fund shares, which could increase Evergreen fund transaction costs or operating expenses or have other adverse consequences on the Evergreen funds, including the Fund.
29
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited)
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Each year, as required by law, the Fund’s Board of Trustees determines whether to approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreements. At an in person meeting on September 23-24, 2009, the Trustees, including a majority of the Trustees who are not “interested persons” (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund or EIMC (the “independent Trustees”), approved the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreements. (References below to the “Fund” are to Evergreen Diversified Capital Builder Fund; references to the “funds” are to the Evergreen funds generally.)
At the same time, the Trustees considered the continuation of the investment advisory agreements for all of the Evergreen funds. The description below refers in many cases to the Trustees’ process for considering, and conclusions regarding, all of the funds’ agreements. In all of their deliberations, the Board of Trustees and the independent Trustees were advised by independent counsel to the independent Trustees and counsel to the funds.
The review process. In connection with its review of the funds’ investment advisory agreements, the Board of Trustees requests and evaluates, and EIMC and any sub-advisors are required to furnish, such information as the Trustees consider to be reasonably necessary in the circumstances. Over the course of the year preceding their September 2009 meeting, the Trustees regularly reviewed information regarding the investment performance of all of the funds. As part of their ongoing review of investment performance, the Trustees monitored for changes in performance and for the results of any changes in a fund’s investment process or investment team. The Trustees paid particular attention to funds whose performance since September 2008 (when the Trustees completed their 2008 review of the funds’ investment advisory agreements) indicated short-term or longer-term performance issues and to funds that they had identified during their 2008 review process as having short- or longer-term performance issues.
In spring 2009, a committee of the Board of Trustees (the “Committee”), working with EIMC management, determined generally the types of information the Trustees would review as part of the 2009 review process and set a timeline detailing the information required and the dates for its delivery to the Trustees. The Board engaged the independent data provider Keil Fiduciary Strategies LLC (“Keil”) to provide fund-specific and industry-wide data containing information of a nature and in a format generally prescribed by the Committee, and the Committee worked with Keil and EIMC to develop appropriate groups of peer funds for each fund. The Committee also identified a number of expense, performance, and other areas of review and requested specific information as to those areas of review.
The Trustees formed small groups to review individual funds in greater detail. They reviewed, with the assistance of an independent industry consultant that they retained, the
30
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued
information that EIMC and Keil provided. In addition, the Trustees considered information regarding, among other things, the funds’ brokerage practices, the funds’ use of derivatives, analyst and research support available to the portfolio management teams, risk management practices, and certain fall-out benefits received directly and indirectly by EIMC and its affiliates from the funds. The Trustees requested and received additional information following that review.
In December 2008 Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”) acquired Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”), EIMC’s parent company. Wells Fargo and EIMC have taken steps to combine the operations of Wells Fargo’s investment management affiliates and EIMC during the past year and have proposed to the Trustees the combination of the mutual fund families managed by them. During the course of the year, and during their review, the Trustees requested and received information about Wells Fargo and its advisory and broker-dealer operations, the status of efforts to combine the Wells Fargo and Evergreen investment management operations, and the effects on the funds and on the services provided by EIMC and its affiliates to the funds. In their deliberations, the Trustees were mindful that it was possible that the proposed combination of the two fund families might be effected during the coming 12-month period.
The Committee met several times by telephone during the 2009 review process to consider the information provided to it. The Committee then met with representatives of EIMC and its affiliates, including Wells Fargo. In addition, during the course of their review, the Trustees discussed the continuation of the funds’ advisory agreements with representatives of EIMC, and in meetings with independent legal counsel in multiple private sessions at which no personnel of EIMC were present. At a meeting of the full Board of Trustees held on September 23-24, 2009, the Committee reported the results of its discussions with EIMC. The full Board met with representatives of EIMC and its affiliates and engaged in further review of the materials provided to it, after which the independent Trustees and the full Board approved the continuation of each of the advisory and sub-advisory agreements.
The Trustees’ determination to approve the continuation of the advisory and sub-advisory agreements was based on a comprehensive evaluation of all of the information provided to them. In considering the continuation of the agreements, the Trustees did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each Trustee attributed different weights to various factors. The Trustees evaluated information provided to them both in terms of the funds generally and with respect to each fund, including the Fund, specifically as they considered appropriate. Although the Trustees considered the continuation of the agreements for each of the funds as part of the larger process of considering the continuation of the advisory contracts for all of the funds, their determination to continue the advisory agreements for each of the funds was ultimately made on a fund-by-fund basis.
31
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued
This summary describes a number of the most important, but not necessarily all, of the factors considered by the Board and the independent Trustees.
Information reviewed. The Board of Trustees and committees of the Board of Trustees met periodically during the course of the year. EIMC presented a wide variety of information at those meetings regarding the services it provides for the funds, the investment performance of the funds, and other aspects of the business and operations of the funds. At those meetings, and in the process of considering the continuation of the agreements, the Trustees considered information regarding, for example, the funds’ investment results; the portfolio management teams for the funds and the experience of the members of the teams, and any recent changes in the membership of the teams; portfolio trading practices; compliance by the funds and EIMC with applicable laws and regulations and with the funds’ and EIMC’s compliance policies and procedures; risk evaluation and oversight procedures at EIMC; services provided by affiliates of EIMC to the funds and shareholders of the funds; and other information relating to the nature, extent, and quality of services provided by EIMC. The Trustees considered a number of changes in portfolio management personnel at EIMC and its advisory affiliates in the year since September 2008. The Trustees also considered changes in personnel at the funds and EIMC, including the appointment of a new President of the funds, who also serves as President and Chief Operating Officer of EIMC, and a new Chief Investment Officer of EIMC in August of 2008.
The Trustees considered the rates at which the funds pay investment advisory fees, and the efforts generally by EIMC and its affiliates as sponsors of the funds. The data provided by Keil showed the management fees paid by each fund in comparison to the management fees of other peer mutual funds, in addition to data regarding the investment performance of the funds in comparison to other peer mutual funds. The Trustees were assisted by an independent industry consultant in reviewing the information presented to them.
The Trustees noted that, in certain cases, EIMC and/or its affiliates provide advisory services to other clients that are comparable to the advisory services they provide to certain funds. The Trustees considered the information EIMC provided regarding the rates at which those other clients pay advisory fees to EIMC. Fees charged to those other clients were generally lower than those charged to the respective funds. In respect of these other accounts, EIMC noted that the compliance, reporting, and other legal burdens of providing investment advice to mutual funds generally exceed those required to provide advisory services to non-mutual fund clients such as retirement or pension plans.
The Trustees considered the transfer agency fees paid by the funds to an affiliate of EIMC. They reviewed information presented to them showing that the transfer agency fees charged to the funds were generally consistent with industry norms.
32
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued
The Trustees also considered that EIMC serves as administrator to the funds and receives a fee for its services as administrator. In their comparison of fees paid by the funds with those paid by other mutual funds, the Trustees considered administrative fees paid by the funds and those other mutual funds. They considered that EIS, an affiliate of EIMC, would serve as distributor to the funds until January 3, 2010, and that Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, also an affiliate of EIMC, would serve as distributor to the funds beginning on January 4, 2010, and noted that the distributor receives fees from the funds for those services. The Trustees also considered other so-called “fall-out” benefits to EIMC and its affiliates due to their other relationships with the funds, including, for example, soft-dollar services received by EIMC attributable to transactions entered into by EIMC on behalf of the funds and brokerage commissions received by Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC (“Wells Fargo Advisors”) (formerly Wachovia Securities, LLC), an affiliate of EIMC, from transactions effected by it for the funds. The Trustees noted that the funds pay sub-transfer agency fees to various financial institutions, including Wells Fargo Advisors and its affiliates, that hold fund shares in omnibus accounts, and that an affiliate of EIMC receives fees for administering the sub-transfer agency payment program. In reviewing the services provided by an affiliate of EIMC, the Trustees noted that the affiliate of EIMC that provides transfer agency services to the funds had won recognition from Dalbar customer service each year since 1998, and also won recognition from National Quality Review for customer service and for accuracy in processing transactions in 2008. They also considered that Wells Fargo Advisors and its affiliates receive distribution-related fees and shareholder servicing payments (including amounts derived from payments under the funds’ Rule 12b-1 plans) in respect of shares sold or held through them and that an affiliate of EIMC receives compensation for serving as a securities lending agent for a number of the funds.
The Trustees considered regulatory actions taken against EIMC or its affiliates in the past year, and on-going reviews of the operations of EIMC and its affiliates as they might affect the funds. They considered the findings of the regulators, the cooperation of EIMC and its affiliates with those regulators and with the Trustees in respect of those actions and reviews, and the remedial steps EIMC and its affiliates have taken in response. They also considered the scope and nature of on-going reviews being conducted by EIMC and its affiliates, and communications to the Trustees relating to those reviews.
Nature and quality of the services provided. The Trustees considered that EIMC and its affiliates generally provide a comprehensive investment management service to the funds. They noted that EIMC formulates and implements an investment program for the Fund. They noted that EIMC makes its personnel available to serve as officers of the funds, and concluded that the reporting and management functions provided by EIMC with respect to the funds were generally satisfactory. The Trustees considered the investment philosophy of the Fund’s portfolio management team and the in-house research
33
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued
capabilities of EIMC and its affiliates, as well as other resources available to EIMC, including research services available to it from third parties.
The Trustees considered the managerial and financial resources available to EIMC and its affiliates and the commitment that the Evergreen/Wells Fargo organization has made to the funds generally. They considered assurances from representatives of Wells Fargo that the merger of Wells Fargo and Wachovia and the integration of those firms’ advisory and broker-dealer operations was not expected to result in any adverse effect on the funds, on the quality and level of services that EIMC provides to the funds, or on the resources available to the funds and to EIMC, and that Wells Fargo is committed to continue providing the funds with high-quality services.
The Trustees noted the resources EIMC and its affiliates have committed to the regulatory, compliance, accounting, tax and oversight of tax reporting, and shareholder servicing functions, and the number and quality of staff committed to those functions, which they concluded were appropriate and generally in line with EIMC’s responsibilities to the Fund and to the funds generally. The Board and the independent Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the funds’ advisory agreements, that they were generally satisfied with the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by EIMC, including services provided by EIMC under its administrative services agreements with the funds. They determined that the nature and scope of the services provided by EIMC were consistent with EIMC’s duties under the investment advisory agreements and appropriate and consistent with the investment programs and best interests of the funds.
Investment performance. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each fund, both by comparison to other comparable mutual funds and to broad market indices. Although the Trustees considered the performance of all share classes, the Trustees noted that, for the one-, three-, five-, and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2008, the Fund’s Class A shares had underperformed the broad-based securities index against which the Trustees compared the Fund’s performance (a 60%/40% blend of the Russell 1000 Index and the Barclays Capital Aggregate Bond Index), and performed in the fifth quintile of the mutual funds against which the Trustees compared the Fund’s performance. The Trustees noted that the Fund’s portfolio manager had changed in 2007 and that the new portfolio manager had not yet managed the Fund for a sufficiently long period to allow for definitive conclusions about the new portfolio manager’s performance. The Trustees concluded that the remedial measures being undertaken by EIMC in light of the Fund’s relative underperformance were at least sufficient to allow the Trustees to continue the advisory agreement.
The Trustees discussed each fund’s performance with representatives of EIMC. In each instance where a fund experienced a substantial period of underperformance relative to its benchmark index and/or the non-Evergreen fund peers against which the Trustees compared the fund’s performance, the Trustees considered EIMC’s explanation of the
34
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (unaudited) continued
reasons for the relative underperformance and the steps being taken to address the relative underperformance. The Trustees emphasized that the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for a fund should not be taken as any indication that the Trustees did not believe investment performance for any specific fund might not be improved, and they noted that they would continue to monitor closely the investment performance of the funds going forward.
Advisory and administrative fees. The Trustees recognized that EIMC does not seek to provide the lowest cost investment advisory service, but to provide a high quality, full-service investment management product at a reasonable price. They also noted that EIMC has in many cases sought to set its investment advisory fees at levels consistent with industry norms. The Trustees noted that, in certain cases, a fund’s management fees were higher than many or most other mutual funds in the same Keil peer group. However, in each case, the Trustees determined on the basis of the information presented that the level of management fees was not excessive. The Trustees noted that the management fee paid by the Fund was lower than the management fees paid by a majority of the mutual funds against which the Trustees compared the Fund’s management fee, and that the level of profitability realized by EIMC in respect of the fee did not appear excessive.
Economies of scale. The Trustees noted the possibility that economies of scale would be achieved by EIMC in managing the funds as the funds grow. They reviewed the breakpoints in the Fund’s advisory fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the effective management fee rate of the Fund (as a percentage of Fund assets) as the Fund grows in size. They considered that, as a fund shrinks in size, breakpoints result in increasing fee levels. The Trustees noted that they would continue to review the appropriate levels of breakpoints in the future, and concluded that the breakpoints as implemented appeared to be a reasonable step toward the realization of economies of scale by the Fund.
Profitability. The Trustees considered information provided to them regarding the profitability to the EIMC organization of the investment advisory, administration, and transfer agency (with respect to the open-end funds only) fees paid to EIMC and its affiliates by each of the funds. They considered that the information provided to them was necessarily estimated, and that the profitability information provided to them, especially on a fund-by-fund basis, did not necessarily provide a definitive tool for evaluating the appropriateness of each fund’s advisory fee. They noted that the levels of profitability of the funds to EIMC varied widely, depending on, among other things, the size and type of fund. They considered the profitability of the funds in light of such factors as, for example, the information they had received regarding the relation of the fees paid by the funds to those paid by other mutual funds, the investment performance of the funds, and the amount of revenues involved. In light of these factors, the Trustees concluded that the profitability to EIMC of the services provided to any of the funds, individually or in the aggregate, should not prevent the Trustees from approving the continuation of the agreements.
35
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
TRUSTEES1 |
|
Charles A. Austin III | Investment Counselor, Anchor Capital Advisors, LLC. (investment advice); Director, The Andover Companies (insurance); Trustee, Arthritis Foundation of New England; Former Director, The Francis Ouimet Society (scholarship program); Former Director, Executive Vice President and Treasurer, State Street Research & Management Company (investment advice) |
K. Dun Gifford | Chairman and President, Oldways Preservation and Exchange Trust (education); Trustee, Member of the Executive Committee, Former Chairman of the Finance Committee, and Former Treasurer, Cambridge College |
Dr. Leroy Keith, Jr. | Managing Director, Almanac Capital Management (commodities firm); Trustee, Phoenix Fund Complex; Director, Diversapack Co. (packaging company); Former Partner, Stonington Partners, Inc. (private equity fund); Former Director, Obagi Medical Products Co.; Former Director, Lincoln Educational Services |
Carol A. Kosel | Former Consultant to the Evergreen Boards of Trustees; Former Vice President and Senior Vice President, Evergreen Investments, Inc.; Former Treasurer, Evergreen Funds; Former Treasurer, Vestaur Securities Fund |
Gerald M. McDonnell | Former Manager of Commercial Operations, CMC Steel (steel producer) |
Patricia B. Norris | President and Director of Buckleys of Kezar Lake, Inc. (real estate company); Former President and Director of Phillips Pond Homes Association (home community); Former Partner, PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (independent registered public accounting firm) |
William Walt Pettit2 | Partner and Vice President, Kellam & Pettit, P.A. (law firm); Director, Superior Packaging Corp. (packaging company); Member, Superior Land, LLC (real estate holding company), Member, K&P Development, LLC (real estate development); Former Director, National Kidney Foundation of North Carolina, Inc. (non-profit organization) |
David M. Richardson | President, Richardson, Runden LLC (executive recruitment advisory services); Director, J&M Cumming Paper Co. (paper merchandising); Former Trustee, NDI Technologies, LLP (communications); Former Consultant, AESC (The Association of Executive Search Consultants) |
Russell A. Salton III, MD | President/CEO, AccessOne MedCard, Inc. |
36
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS continued
Michael S. Scofield | Retired Attorney, Law Offices of Michael S. Scofield; Former Director and Chairman, Branded Media Corporation (multi-media branding company) |
Richard J. Shima | Independent Consultant; Director, Hartford Hospital; Trustee, Greater Hartford YMCA; Former Director, Trust Company of CT; Former Trustee, Saint Joseph College (CT) |
Richard K. Wagoner, CFA3 | Member and Former President, North Carolina Securities Traders Association; Member, Financial Analysts Society |
OFFICERS |
|
W. Douglas Munn4 | Principal occupations: Chief Operating Officer, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC; President and Chief Operating Officer, Evergreen Investment Company, Inc. |
Jeremy DePalma4 | Principal occupations: Senior Vice President, Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC; Former Vice President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.; Former Assistant Vice President, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. |
Michael H. Koonce4 | Principal occupations: Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Evergreen Investment Services, Inc.; Secretary, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC and Evergreen Service Company, LLC |
Robert Guerin4 | Principal occupations: Chief Compliance Officer, Evergreen Funds and Senior Vice President of Evergreen Investment Company, Inc.; Former Managing Director and Senior Compliance Officer, Babson Capital Management LLC; Former Principal and Director, Compliance and Risk Management, State Street Global Advisors; Former Vice President and Manager, Sales Practice Compliance, Deutsche Asset Management |
1 | Each Trustee serves until a successor is duly elected or qualified or until his or her death, resignation, retirement or removal from office. Each Trustee oversaw 77 Evergreen funds as of December 31, 2008. Correspondence for each Trustee may be sent to Evergreen Board of Trustees, P.O. Box 20083, Charlotte, NC 28202. |
2 | It is possible that Mr. Pettit may be viewed as an “interested person” of the Evergreen funds, as defined in the 1940 Act, because of his law firm’s previous representation of affiliates of Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”), the parent to the Evergreen funds’ investment advisor, EIMC. The Trustees are treating Mr. Pettit as an interested trustee for the time being. |
3 | Mr. Wagoner is an “interested person” of the Evergreen funds because of his ownership of shares in Wells Fargo & Company, the parent to the Evergreen funds’ investment advisor. |
4 | The address of the Officer is 200 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116. |
Additional information about the Fund’s Board of Trustees and Officers can be found in the Statement of Additional Information (SAI) and is available upon request without charge by calling 800.343.2898.
37
568008 rv6 11/2009
Item 2 – Code of Ethics
Not required for this semi-annual filing.
Item 3 – Audit Committee Financial Expert
Not required for this semi-annual filing.
Items 4 – Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Not required for this semi-annual filing.
Items 5 – Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable.
Item 6 – Schedule of Investments
Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 7 – Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8 – Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9 – Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10 – Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant’s board of trustees that have been implemented since the Registrant last provided disclosure in response to the requirements of this Item.
Item 11 – Controls and Procedures
(a) | The Registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely. |
(b) | There has been no changes in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 12 – Exhibits
File the exhibits listed below as part of this Form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated.
(a) | Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the Registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit. |
(b)(1) | Separate certifications for the Registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached as EX99.CERT. |
(b)(2) | Separate certifications for the Registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached as EX99.906CERT. The certifications furnished pursuant to this paragraph are not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certifications are not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates them by reference. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Evergreen Equity Trust |
|
|
| |
By: |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| W. Douglas Munn |
|
|
|
Date: November 27, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| W. Douglas Munn |
|
|
|
Date: November 27, 2009
By: |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| Jeremy DePalma |
|
|
|
Date: November 27, 2009