During 2004, the Israeli Government decided to evacuate the Erez Industrial Zone in the Gaza Strip, where part of our operations were located. We owned facilities, leased other facilities and maintained equipment and inventory within this area. In 2005, we moved our “light cut and sew” operation from the Erez Industrial Zone to Sderot and some of our webbing equipment to Nazareth. In August 2005, we evacuated our remaining operations and abandoned the buildings we owned and leased in the Erez Industrial Zone.
The Israeli Government’s decision to evacuate the Gaza Strip was supported by certain resolutions, including the “Evacuation Compensation Law” that was adopted by the Israeli Parliament to compensate the Israeli Gaza Strip settlers as well as business and property owners in the Gaza Strip and in the Erez Industrial Zone. In February 2006, three of our subsidiaries, Export Erez, Mayotex and Achidatex filed claims for compensation pursuant to the Evacuation Compensation Law. In 2005, we recorded a receivable from the Israeli Government of $217,477 related to our direct moving costs and loss on abandoned properties.
In 2006, we were notified that we would receive advance payments in the aggregate amount of $523,000. We applied this payment against the receivable established in 2005 and recorded the excess payment of $240,658, net of taxes, as extraordinary gain.
On February 18, 2008 Export Erez, Mayotex and Achidatex signed definitive agreements with SELA, a government agency, established pursuant to the Evacuation Compensation Law, for compensation of approximately $6.0 million, net of 5% related taxes, receipt of the previous advance payment and the other associated costs. The Company received and recorded gain in the amount of $4,910,541 during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The change in the dollar amount from the amount reported in the first quarter, resulted from the appreciation of the NIS against the U.S. dollar.
Our management views revenues, the sources of our revenues, gross profit margin and the level of inventory compared to revenues as the key performance indicators in assessing our company’s financial condition and results of operations. While our management believes that demand for our products will continue to grow, our business is subject to a high degree of volatility because of the impact of geopolitical events and government budgeting.
In the three months ended June 30, 2008, Achidatex, Export Erez and Owen Mills accounted for $972,549 or 21.7%, $3,180,382 million or 71.1%, and $324,155 or 7.2% of our revenues, respectively. In the three months ended June 30, 2007, Achidatex, Export Erez and Owen Mills accounted for $1,845,721 or 32.7%, $3,575,207 or 63.3%, and $230,050 or 4% of our revenues, respectively.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of sales by segment for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
Gross profit. Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $1.2 million compared to $2.4 million for the same period in 2007. This decrease in gross profit is primarily attributable to the decrease in revenues, resulting in the increased absorption of fixed manufacturing expenses allocated to lower sales during the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. In the three months ended June 30, 2008, Achidatex, Export Erez, and Owen Mills accounted for 45.0%, 46.0% and 9.0%, of our gross profit, respectively. In the three months ended June 30, 2007, Achidatex, Export Erez, and Owen Mills accounted for 33.9%, 61.6% and 4.5%, of our gross profit, respectively.
Our gross profit margin for the three months ended June 30, 2008 declined to 26.3% compared to 41.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2007 primarily due to the decrease in revenues, resulting in a high level of fixed manufacturing expensesallocated to lower sales, and a change in our product mix to products having lower margins. Achidatex’s gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 34.8% compared to 37.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Export Erez’s gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 17.2% compared to 39.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Owen Mills’ gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 33.5% compared to 19.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Selling Expenses. Selling expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 increased to $372,690 from $314,796 for the same period in 2007. The increase in our selling expenses was attributable to the increase in the export sales and to higher commission paid on these sales.Achidatex’s selling expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were $96,551 compared to $32,271 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Export Erez’s selling expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were $270,695 compared to $280,999 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Owen Mills’ selling expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were $5,444 compared to $1,526 for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 decreased to $602,904 from $658,508 for the same period in 2007, mainly as a result of the decreased scope of our operations.
Financial Expenses. We had financial expense, net of $151,243 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to financial income, net of $36,203 for the same period in 2007. The expense is primarily due to the change in the exchange rate of U.S. Dollar versus the NIS, which resulted in a loss of $134,483 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and a gain of $82,743 for the same period in 2007.
Other Income (Expenses), Net. We had other expense, net for the three months ended June 30, 2008 of $56,189 as compared to other income, net of $35,580 for the same period in 2007. Our other expense in 2007 is primarily attributable to loss from sales of highly liquid tradable securities managed by professional broker firms.
Income Tax Expense. Our income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $9,310. Although we had a net loss from operating activities on a consolidated basis, Achidatex had taxable income for which tax expenses were provided, presented net of a tax benefit received by Export Erez. We did not record a tax benefit related to the loss incurred by our U.S. operation due to our deferred tax valuation allowance.
Extraordinary Income.For the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized extraordinary income of $228,703, net of tax. We did not recognized any extraordinary income in the comparable 2007 period. This amount was received by Export Erez, Mayotex and Achidatex, as compensation from the Israeli Government pursuant to the Evacuation Compensation Law.
Minority Interest. Minority interest in the profits and losses of one of our consolidated subsidiaries represents the minority shareholders’ share of the profits or losses in such majority owned subsidiary. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded minority interest’s in profits of $18,042 compared to minority interest’s in profits of $99,157 for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
15
Net Income (Loss). In the three months ended June 30, 2008, we had consolidated net income of $195,087 compared to consolidated net income of $648,316 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Achidatex’s net income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $161,647 compared to net income of $313,997 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Export Erez’s net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $18,106 compared to net income of $407,067 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Owen Mills’ net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $11,336 compared to a net loss of $971 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Defense Industries’ net income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $62,882 compared to a net loss of $71,777 for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
Net Revenues. Net revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased to $7.6 million from $9.6 million in the same period in 2007, a decrease of 20.8%. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease of approximately $2.2 million in our local military market segment and the loss of our customer in the export civilian market which was offset in part by an increase of approximately $1.1 million in our local civilian market. The decreased revenues in our local military market segment is attributable to a general decrease in demand from the Israeli Ministry of Defense.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of sales by segment for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
| Six Months Ended June 30,
|
---|
| 2008
| 2007
|
---|
| | |
---|
| | |
---|
| | |
---|
Local civilian market | | | $ | 2,777,473 | | $ | 1,680,165 | |
Export civilian market | | | | - | | | 538,884 | |
Local military market | | | | 2,784,788 | | | 4,991,271 | |
Export military market | | | | 2,040,127 | | | 2,355,230 | |
|
| |
| |
Total | | | $ | 7,602,388 | | $ | 9,565,550 | |
|
| |
| |
Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $1.9 million compared to $3.7 million for the same period in 2008. This decrease in gross profit is principally attributable to the decrease in revenues resulting in the increased absorption of fixed manufacturing expenses allocated to lower sales, and a product mix with lower margins. In the six months ended June 30, 2008, Achidatex, Export Erez, and Owen Mills accounted for 35.4%, 57.8% and 6.8%, of our gross profit, respectively. In the six months ended June 30, 2007, Achidatex, Export Erez, and Owen Mills accounted for 33.3%, 62.6% and 4.1%, of our gross profit, respectively.
Our gross profit margin for the six months ended June 30, 2008 declined to 25.3% compared to 38.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily due to the decrease in revenues, resulting in a high level of fixed manufacturing expenses allocated to lower sales and a change in our product mix to products having lower margins. Achidatex’s gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 25.2% compared to 31.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Export Erez’s gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 20.6% compared to 35.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Owen Mills’ gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 21.9% compared to 16.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Selling Expenses. Selling expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased to $529,834from $554,561 for the same period in 2007. The decrease in our selling expenses was attributable to lower commissions paid on the export sales.Achidatex’s selling expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $159,065 compared to $108,634 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Export Erez’s selling expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $362,498 compared to $437,458 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Owen Mills’ selling expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $8,271 compared to $8,469 for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
16
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 increased to $1,141,229 from $1,072,401 for the same period in 2007, primarily due to an increase in our provisions to doubtful accounts receivables and costs associated with our compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Financial Expenses. We had financial expenses, net of $266,501 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to financial expenses, net of $48,069 for the same period in 2007. The increase is primarily due to the change in the U.S. Dollar exchange rate versus the NIS, which resulted in a expense of $261,540 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and a gain of $32,176 for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Other Income (Expenses), Net. We had other expense, net for the six months ended June 30, 2008 of $96,669 as compared to other income, net of $77,584 for the same period in 2007. Our other expense in 2008 is attributable to loss from sales of tradable securities.
Income Tax Expense. Our income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $89,004. Although we had a net loss from operating activities on a consolidated basis, Achidatex had taxable income for which tax expenses were provided, presented net of a tax benefit received by Export Erez. We did not record a tax benefit related to the loss incurred by our U.S. operation due to our deferred tax valuation allowance.
Extraordinary Income.For the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized and recorded extraordinary income of $4,910,541, net of tax. This amount was received by our three subsidiaries, Export Erez, Mayotex and Achidatex, as compensation from the Israeli Government pursuant to the Evacuation Compensation Law.
Minority Interest. Minority interest in the profits and losses of one of our consolidated subsidiaries represents the minority shareholders’ share of the profits or losses in such majority owned subsidiary. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized and recorded minority interest in profit of $59,459 compared to minority interest in profit of $122,267 for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Net Income. In the six months ended June 30, 2008, our consolidated net income was $4,647,751 million compared to net income of $1,052,226 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Achidatex’s net income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $397,318 compared to net income of $387,17 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Export Erez’s net income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $4,260,854 million compared to net income of $791,275 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Owen Mills’ net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $91,626 compared to a net loss of $62,742 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Defense Industries’ net income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $81,199 compared to net loss of $63,485 for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2008, we had $1.8 million in cash and cash equivalents, $4.4 million in trading securities, $2.0 million in bank deposits and working capital of $12.5 million as compared to $1.1 million in cash and cash equivalents, $2.9 million in trading securities and working capital of $6.7 million at December 31, 2007. The improvement in our liquidity and capital resources is primarily attributable to the extraordinary income of $4.9 million, net of tax, that we recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2008 when our three subsidiaries, Export Erez, Mayotex and Achidatex, received compensation from the Israeli Government with respect to the evacuation of the Gaza Industrial Zone.
17
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods presented:
| Six months ended
|
---|
| June 30, 2008
| June 30, 2007
|
---|
| | |
---|
| | |
---|
| | |
---|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | | $ | (1,917,075 | ) | $ | 753,997 | |
Cash provided by extraordinary items | | | | 4,910,541 | | | - | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | | (1,995,114 | ) | | (266,197 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | | (309,460 | ) | | (734,003 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | | 728,486 | | | (236,752 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | | 1,120,054 | | | 1,670,912 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | | | 1,848,540 | | | 1,434,160 | |
Net cash used in operating activities was $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $753,997 for the same period in 2007. This was primarily attributable to net loss from operating activities of $262,790, an $1.7 million increase in inventories in order to support future sales, new product lines and also reflects the production of a significant amount of finished and semi finished products that were delivered at the beginning of the third quarter, increase in trading securities of $1.1 million, an increase in other current assets of $152,008, and decrease in accounts payable of $107,757 offset by a decrease in accounts receivable of $511,218, depreciation of $288,893 and an increase in deffered income of $461,013.
Net cash used in investing activities was $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to $266,197 in the six months ended June 30, 2007. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, purchases of fixed assets were $125,682 and $1.9 million comprises bank deposits compared to purchases of fixed assets of $292,762 during the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Net cash used in financing activities was $309,460 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to $734,003 of net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we decreased our short-term debt by $69,361 and we repaid $288,312 of long-term debt.
Most of our large contracts, which are Israeli Governmental contracts, are supported by letters of credit. As a result, we believe that we have limited exposure to doubtful accounts receivables. We have strived to balance our accounts payable and accounts receivable.
Subject to an unexpected growth in inventories as a result of future growth in sales, new product lines and a significant change in raw material prices, we intend to use our cash flow from operations for the acquisition of companies or equipment to expand our capabilities.
We anticipate that our research and development expenses in 2008 will reflect an annualized spending of approximately $100,000per year.
On January 17, 2008 we obtained a short-term credit facility of $250,000 from Bank Leumi USA. The interest rate for such credit facility is Libor + 2%. The credit facility is due November 17, 2008. As of June 30, 2008 the credit facility was utilized in full. On June 2, 2008 we obtained a short-term credit facility of $250,000 from Bank Leumi USA. The interest rate for such credit facility is Libor + 2%. The credit facility is due December 31, 2008. As of June 30, 2008, the credit facility had not been utilized.
We believe that we have sufficient working capital and borrowing capability to sustain our current level of operations for the next twelve months.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We develop products in Israel and sell them in Israel, North and South America, Asia, Africa and several European countries. Our sales in Israel are denominated in NIS while most of our export sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. In addition, our labor expenses are primarily paid in NIS while our expenses for raw materials are paid in U.S. dollars and Euros. As a result, our financial results are affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets.
Our foreign currency exposure is significant due to the depreciation of the U.S. dollar versus the NIS and the Euro. We expect it will continue to be significant, since a significant portion of the prices of our material purchases, as well as part of our sales are denominated in U.S. dollars.
18
In the year ended December 31, 2007, the inflation rate in Israel was 2.9% and the NIS appreciated in relation to the U.S. dollar at a rate of 8.97%, from NIS 4.225 per $1 on December 31, 2006 to NIS 3.846 per $1 on December 31, 2007. In the six month period ended June 30, 2008, the inflation in Israel was 2.34% while the NIS appreciated in relation to the U.S. dollar at a rate of 12.84%. We will be adversely affected if the U.S. dollar, the standard currency used in our export sales, continues to depreciate against the Euro or the NIS, the currencies used for many of our purchases of raw material and labor costs.
We did not enter into any foreign exchange contracts or hedging transactions in the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of June 30, 2008.
| Payments due by Period
|
---|
Contractual Obligations
| Total
| Less than 1 year
| 2 -3 years
| 4 -5 years
| more than 5 years
|
---|
| | | | | |
---|
| | | | | |
---|
| | | | | |
---|
Long-term debt obligations | | | $ | 1,053,931 | | $ | 531,837 | | $ | 463,232 | | $ | 58,863 | | $ | - | |
Estimated interest | | |
payments on long-term debt | | |
obligations | | | | 75,529 | | | 35,981 | | | 33,732 | | | 5,816 | | | - | |
Operating lease obligations | | | | 669,118 | | | 441,029 | | | 201,239 | | | 26,850 | | | - | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | |
---|
Total | | | $ | 1,798,578 | | $ | 1,008,847 | | $ | 698,203 | | $ | 91,529 | | $ | - | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Critical Accounting Policies
A discussion of our critical accounting policies was provided in Item 6 of our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007. There were no significant changes to these policies in the first six months of 2008.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R), (“FAS 158”). This Standard requires recognition of the funded status of a benefit plan in the statement of financial position. The Standard also requires recognition in other comprehensive income certain gains and losses that arise during the period but are deferred under pension accounting rules, as well as modifies the timing of reporting and adds certain disclosures. FAS 158 provides recognition and disclosure elements to be effective as of the end of the fiscal year after December 15, 2006 and measurement elements to be effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. We do not expect the remaining elements of this Statement to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows when adopted.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007) “Business Combinations,” a revision of the original “SFAS No. 141". This statement requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in the Statement. That replaces the original Statement 141, cost-allocation process, which required the cost of an acquisition to be allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. We are required to adopt the revised SFAS No. 141 on January 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of the revised SFAS No. 141 on our consolidated financial statements.
19
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” an amendment of ARB No. 51. This statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and for the deconsolidation of subsidiaries and clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 also required expanded disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent owners and the interests of the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. We are required to adopt SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this Statement on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 161 (“SFAS 161”), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. SFAS 161 requires companies with derivative instruments to disclose information that should enable financial-statement users to understand how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the potential impact that SFAS 161 will have on tour consolidated financial statements.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Not applicable.
Item 4T. | Controls and Procedures |
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures. As of June 30, 2008, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer participated with our management in evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the SEC reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified by the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2008 for the same reasons indicated in our annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
Plan for Remediation of Material Weaknesses
In response to the material weaknesses identified in our Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, our management plans to improve our control environment and to remedy the identified material weaknesses by adding qualified financial personnel and resources to implement, maintain and monitor the required internal controls over the financial reporting process. In addition, we believe this will provide for reasonable and necessary separation of duties to allow for the compilation, review and analysis of complete financial reporting in a timely manner, and for the management to review key performance indicators regularly to identify and investigate significant variances by implementing a reporting package procedure.
In the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, we relied on the support of outside financial service providers in connection with the preparation of our financial reports. In addition, we are currently in the process of hiring a qualified controller. In the next quarter we will start an upgrade program for our ERP system. Such upgrade will allow us to significantly improve our financial reporting process as well as the internal planning and our control over the financial reporting process.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
20
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION:
We are not a party to any pending or to the best of our knowledge, any threatened legal proceedings.
In February 2006, three of our subsidiaries, Export Erez, Mayotex and Achidatex filed claims for compensation pursuant to the Evacuation Compensation Law. In January 2007 we received advanced payments in the amounts of approximately $523,000. On February 18, 2008 our three subsidiaries, Export Erez, Mayotex and Achidatex signed definitive agreements with SELA, a government agency established pursuant to the Evacuation Compensation Law, for compensation of approximately $6 million, net of the $523,000 we received in 2007. The net compensation payments after our payment of approximately $600,000 of expenses was recognized as an extraordinary gain net of the 5% taxes payment on such payment.
There have been no material changes to our “Risk Factors” set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
On March 18, 2008, we issued 123,839 shares of common stock, having a fair value of $40,000 at February 28, 2008, to the former owner of Owen Mills. The shares were issued pursuant to the agreement we signed on February 28, 2005 to acquire the business of Owen Mills. The shares were issued pursuant to the exemption afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
| 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. |
| 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. |
| 32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| 32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
21
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: August 14, 2008 | | DEFENSE INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
By: /s/ Joseph Postbinder —————————————— Joseph Postbinder Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
22