UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 |
FORM 10-Q
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 |
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _______ to _________ |
Commission File Number 001-33126
CITIZENS FIRST CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
KENTUCKY | 61-0912615 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1065 Ashley Street | |
Bowling Green, Kentucky | 42103 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(270) 393-0700
(Registrant’s telephone number)
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months ( or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes X No __ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: |
Class | Outstanding at November 5, 2009 |
Common Stock, no par value per share | 1,968,777 shares |
1
CITIZENS FIRST CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||
ITEM 1 | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 3 |
ITEM 2 | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 17 |
ITEM 3 | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | 29 |
ITEM 4 | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 29 |
PART II – FINANCIAL INFORMATION | OTHER INFORMATION | |
ITEM 6 | EXHIBITS | 30 |
SIGNATURES | 31 |
2
Part 1. Financial Information |
Item 1. Financial Statements
Citizens First Corporation | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) | |||
September 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | ||
(Dollars in thousands except share data) | |||
Assets | |||
Cash and due from financial institutions | $6,095 | $9,248 | |
Federal funds sold | 7,260 | 6,083 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | 13,355 | 15,331 | |
Available for sale securities | 38,733 | 39,928 | |
Loans held for sale | 2,877 | 553 | |
Loans, net of allowance of $3,777 and $3,816 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively | 255,631 | 267,929 | |
Premises and equipment, net | 11,213 | 11,315 | |
Bank owned life insurance | 6,685 | 6,457 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost | 2,025 | 2,025 | |
Accrued interest receivable | 2,090 | 2,358 | |
Deferred income taxes | 4,112 | 2,971 | |
Goodwill | 2,575 | 2,575 | |
Core deposit intangible | 1,361 | 1,569 | |
Other assets | 1,083 | 2,114 | |
Total assets | $341,740 | $355,125 | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | |||
Liabilities | |||
Deposits: | |||
Non-interest bearing | $36,858 | $27,247 | |
Savings, NOW and money market | 65,214 | 69,548 | |
Time | 173,702 | 176,220 | |
Total deposits | 275,774 | 273,015 | |
Securities sold under repurchase agreements | 1,517 | 8,258 | |
FHLB advances | 19,500 | 27,500 | |
Subordinated debentures | 5,000 | 5,000 | |
Accrued interest payable | 469 | 683 | |
Other liabilities | 1,502 | 1,384 | |
Total liabilities | 303,762 | 315,840 | |
Stockholders' Equity: | |||
6.5% cumulative preferred stock, no par value; authorized 250 shares; issued and outstanding 250 shares at September 30, 2009 and at December 31, 2008; liquidation preference of $7,659 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 | 7,659 | 7,659 | |
5.0% Series A preferred stock, no par value; authorized 250 shares; issued and outstanding 250 shares at September 30, 2009 and at December 31, 2008; liquidation preference of $8,779 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 | 8,507 | 8,459 | |
Common stock, no par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 1,968,777 shares at September 30, 2009 and at December 31, 2008 | 27,072 | 27,058 | |
Accumulated deficit | (5,036) | (3,228) | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (224) | (663) | |
Total stockholders' equity | 37,978 | 39,285 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $341,740 | $355,125 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
3
Citizens First Corporation | |||
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) | |||
For the three months ended September 30 | 2009 | 2008 | |
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |||
Interest and dividend income | |||
Loans | $3,969 | $4,630 | |
Taxable securities | 146 | 291 | |
Non-taxable securities | 188 | 189 | |
Federal funds sold and other | 27 | 48 | |
Total interest and dividend income | 4,330 | 5,158 | |
Interest expense | |||
Deposits | 1,297 | 2,027 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings | 13 | 82 | |
FHLB advances | 147 | 193 | |
Subordinated debentures | 29 | 57 | |
Total interest expense | 1,486 | 2,359 | |
Net interest income | 2,844 | 2,799 | |
Provision for loan losses | 300 | 575 | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 2,544 | 2,224 | |
Non-interest income | |||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 353 | 453 | |
Net gains on sales of mortgage loans | 63 | 76 | |
Lease income | 38 | 72 | |
Gain on sale of investments | - | - | |
Income from company-owned life insurance | 76 | 77 | |
Other income | 146 | 114 | |
Total non-interest income | 676 | 792 | |
Non-interest expenses | |||
Salaries and employee benefits | 1,304 | 1,327 | |
Net occupancy expense | 336 | 338 | |
Equipment expense | 192 | 189 | |
Advertising and public relations | 113 | 129 | |
Professional fees | 120 | 104 | |
Data processing services | 179 | 166 | |
Franchise shares and deposit tax | 114 | 116 | |
FDIC Insurance | 128 | 54 | |
Core deposit intangible amortization | 69 | 70 | |
Postage and office supplies | 50 | 52 | |
Telephone and other communication | 49 | 62 | |
Other | 208 | 236 | |
Total non-interest expenses | 2,862 | 2,843 | |
Income before income taxes | 358 | 173 | |
Provision for income taxes (benefit) | 31 | (24) | |
Net income | $ 327 | $ 197 | |
Dividends declared and discount accretion on preferred stock | 256 | 130 | |
Net income available for common stockholders | $ 71 | $ 67 | |
Earnings per common share, basic and diluted | $0.03 | $0.03 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
4
Citizens First Corporation | |||
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) | |||
For the nine months ended September 30 | 2009 | 2008 | |
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |||
Interest and dividend income | |||
Loans | $11,835 | $14,134 | |
Taxable securities | 608 | 875 | |
Non-taxable securities | 565 | 550 | |
Federal funds sold and other | 78 | 166 | |
Total interest and dividend income | 13,086 | 15,725 | |
Interest expense | |||
Deposits | 4,295 | 6,600 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings | 96 | 109 | |
FHLB advances | 491 | 549 | |
Subordinated debentures | 103 | 192 | |
Total interest expense | 4,985 | 7,450 | |
Net interest income | 8,101 | 8,275 | |
Provision for loan losses | 3,500 | 852 | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 4,601 | 7,423 | |
Non-interest income | |||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 994 | 1,225 | |
Net gains on sales of mortgage loans | 258 | 214 | |
Lease income | 119 | 177 | |
Gain on sale of investments | 361 | 0 | |
Income from company-owned life insurance | 226 | 224 | |
Other income | 391 | 329 | |
Total non-interest income | 2,349 | 2,169 | |
Non-interest expenses | |||
Salaries and employee benefits | 4,092 | 4,000 | |
Net occupancy expense | 1,010 | 958 | |
Equipment expense | 569 | 577 | |
Advertising and public relations | 340 | 360 | |
Professional fees | 448 | 296 | |
Data processing services | 501 | 546 | |
Franchise shares and deposit tax | 365 | 345 | |
FDIC Insurance | 489 | 145 | |
Core deposit intangible amortization | 207 | 220 | |
Postage and office supplies | 165 | 140 | |
Telephone and other communication | 149 | 193 | |
Other | 646 | 610 | |
Total non-interest expenses | 8,981 | 8,390 | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | (2,031) | 1,202 | |
Provision for income taxes (benefit) | (987) | 167 | |
Net income (loss) | $(1,044) | $ 1,035 | |
Dividends declared and discount accretion on preferred stock | 764 | 389 | |
Net income (loss) available for common stockholders | $(1,808) | $ 646 | |
Earnings (loss) per common share, basic and diluted | $(0.92) | $0.33 | |
Cash dividend per common share | - | $0.05 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
5
Citizens First Corporation | |||
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) For the nine months ended September 30 | |||
2009 | 2008 | ||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||
Balance January 1 | $39,285 | $37,296 | |
Net income (loss) | (1,044) | 1,035 | |
Issuance of common stock | - | 93 | |
Stock-based compensation | 13 | 87 | |
Payment of common dividend, $0.05 per share | - | (99) | |
Payment of preferred dividends, $1,432 and $1,557 per share for 2009 and 2008 | (716) | (389) | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | 440 | (883) | |
Balance at end of period | $37,978 | $37,140 | |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited) For the three months ended September 30 | |||
2009 | 2008 | ||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||
Net income | $327 | $197 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | |||
Unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities, net | 776 | (431) | |
Comprehensive income (loss) | $1,103 | $(234) | |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited) For the nine months ended September 30 | |||
2009 | 2008 | ||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||
Net income (loss) | $(1,044) | $1,035 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | |||
Unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities, net | 440 | (883) | |
Comprehensive income (loss) | $(604) | $152 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Citizens First Corporation | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) | |||
For the nine months ended September 30 | 2009 | 2008 | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |||
Operating activities: | |||
Net income (loss) | $ (1,044) | $1,035 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||
Depreciation and amortization | 636 | 628 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | 13 | 87 | |
Provision for loan losses | 3,500 | 852 | |
Amortization of premiums and discounts on securities | 82 | 46 | |
Amortization of core deposit intangible | 207 | 220 | |
Deferred income taxes | (1,141) | (454) | |
Sale of mortgage loans held for sale | 19,311 | 13,244 | |
Origination of mortgage loans for sale | (21,377) | (12,823) | |
Gain on the sale of securities available for sale | (361) | - | |
Gain on the sale of property plant and equipment | (14) | - | |
Gains on sales of loans | (258) | (214) | |
Net loss on sale of other real estate owned | 92 | 33 | |
FHLB stock dividends received | - | (79) | |
Changes in: | |||
Interest receivable | 268 | 346 | |
Other assets | 406 | (417) | |
Interest payable and other liabilities | (322) | 338 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | (2) | 2,842 | |
Investing activities: | |||
Loan originations and payments, net | 8,313 | (21,447) | |
Purchases of premises and equipment | (623) | (290) | |
Purchase of available-for-sale securities | (22,092) | (10,538) | |
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities | 11,953 | 9,302 | |
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities | 12,278 | - | |
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned | 792 | 860 | |
Proceeds from disposal of property plant and equipment | 103 | - | |
Payment related to purchase of Commonwealth Mortgage and Southern KY Land Title, Inc., net of stock issued | - | (278) | |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 10,724 | (22,391) | |
Financing activities: | |||
Net change in demand deposits, money market, NOW, and savings accounts | 5,277 | (12,714) | |
Net change in time deposits | (2,518) | 12,013 | |
Proceeds from FHLB advances | 21,500 | 17,500 | |
Repayment of FHLB advances | (29,500) | (11,847) | |
Net change in repurchase agreements | (6,741) | 8,852 | |
Dividends paid on preferred stock | (716) | (389) | |
Dividends paid on common stock | - | (99) | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (12,698) | 13,316 | |
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (1,976) | (6,233) | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 15,331 | 13,862 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of quarter | $13,355 | $7,629 | |
Supplemental Cash Flows Information: | |||
Interest paid | $5,199 | $7,658 | |
Income taxes paid | $ - | $ 50 | |
Loans transferred to other real estate | $ 485 | $ 1,047 | |
Stock issued for contingent payment related to purchase of Commonwealth Mortgage and Southern Ky. Land Title, Inc. | $ - | $ 93 | |
Deferred revenue related to a sale leaseback transaction | $ 12 | $ 12 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
7
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(1) Basis of Presentation
The accounting and reporting policies of Citizens First Corporation (the “Company”) and its subsidiary, Citizens First Bank, Inc. (the “Bank”), conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and general practices within the banking industry. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Bank. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements are based on various factors including the current interest rate environment and the general strength of the local economy. Changes in the overall interest rate environment can significantly affect the Company’s net interest income and the value of its recorded assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been reflected in the accompanying unaudited financial statements. Those adjustments consist only of normal recurring adjustments. Results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year. The consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of that date.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior consolidated financial statements to conform to the current presentation.
(2) Adoption of New Accounting Standards
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 805 “Business Combinations” whereby assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies should be recognized at fair value on the acquisition date if fair value can be determined during the measurement period. If fair value cannot be determined, companies should typically account for the acquired contingencies using existing accounting guidance. This ASC is effective for new acquisitions consummated on or after January 1, 2009. Adoption of FASB ASC Topic 805 did not impact the results of operations or financial position but will depend on future acquisitions, if any.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 320 “Investments – Debt and Equity Securities,” which amends existing guidance for determining whether impairment is other-than-temporary for debt securities. The ASC requires an entity to assess whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these criteria is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized in earnings. For securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment recognized in earnings is limited to the amount related to credit losses, while impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. Additionally, the ASC expands and increases the frequency of existing disclosures about other-than-temporary impairments for debt and equity securities. This ASC is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The adoption of this ASC did not have a material effect on the results of operations or financial position.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” This ASC emphasizes that even if there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity, the objective of a fair value measurement remains the same. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants. The ASC provides a number of factors to consider when evaluating whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability in relation to normal market activity. In addition, when transactions or quoted prices are not considered orderly, adjustments to those prices based on the weight of available information may be needed to determine the appropriate fair value. The ASC also requires
8
increased disclosures. This ASC is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Early adoption was permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The adoption of this ASC did not have a material effect on the results of operations or financial position.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 825 “Financial Instruments.” This ASC requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies that were previously only required in annual financial statements. This ASC is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this ASC did not have a material impact on the results of operations or financial position as it only required disclosures which are included in the Footnotes.
In May 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 855 “Subsequent Events.” ASC Topic 855 moves part of the audit literature regarding subsequent events into the accounting standards. The ASC does not change the criteria used when accounting for subsequent events, though the terms are changed to “recognized subsequent events” (previously Type 1) and “nonrecognized subsequent events” (previously Type 2). Although the ASC did not change the recognition principles for subsequent events, it did create some new requirements and disclosures. A public entity is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the “financial statements are issued”. The ASC is effective for interim and annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. For the financial statements related to the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2009 contained herein, we evaluated subsequent events through November 5, 2009, the date these financial statements were filed with the SEC.
In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 105 “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” With the issuance of ASC Topic 105 the FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM (Codification) became the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of this ASC, the Codification superseded all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other nongrandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification became nonauthoritative. This ASC is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this ASC did not have a material effect on the results of operations or financial position.
Recently Issued and Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards:
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statements No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, and No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). Statement No. 166 is currently being processed for inclusion in the Codification and will require more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. It eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures.
Statement No. 167 is currently being processed for inclusion in the Codification and replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with a qualitative approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity (VIE) that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. Statement Nos. 166 and 167 will be effective at the start of a reporting entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009, or January 1, 2010, for a calendar year-end entity. The Company plans to adopt these statements in the first quarter of 2010; however, does not expect the adoption to have a material effect on the results of operations or financial position.
9
In 2002, the board of directors adopted the employee stock option plan, which became effective upon the approval of the Company’s shareholders at the annual meeting in April 2003. The purpose of the plan is to afford key employees the incentive to remain with the Company and to reward their service by providing the employees the opportunity to share in the Company’s future success. 132,300 shares of Company common stock have been reserved for issuance under the plan. 46,186 shares remain available for future issuance. Options granted expire after ten years, and vest ratably over a three year period.
In 2003, the board of directors adopted the non-employee director stock option plan for non-employee directors, which became effective upon the approval of the Company’s shareholders at the annual meeting in April 2003. The purpose of the plan is to assist the Company in promoting a greater identity of interest between the Company’s non-employee directors and shareholders, and in attracting and retaining non-employee directors by affording them an opportunity to share in the Company’s future successes. 43,946 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the plan. 29,835 shares remain available for future issuance. Options granted expire after ten years, and are immediately vested.
The fair value of options granted is estimated on the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. There were no options granted for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009.
The Company accounts for its employee and non-employee stock option plans under the recognition and measurement principles of ASC Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” effective January 1, 2006. ASC Topic 718 requires the recognition of stock-based compensation for the number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, compensation expense was $0 and $29,000. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, compensation expense was $13,000 and $87,000. As of September 30, 2009, there is no unrecognized compensation expense associated with stock options.
A summary of the status of the plans at September 30, 2009, and changes during the period then ended is presented below:
2009 | ||||
Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | |||
Outstanding, beginning of year | 139,133 | $15.16 | ||
Granted | - | - | ||
Exercised | - | - | ||
Forfeited | (40,407) | $14.84 | ||
Expired | - | - | ||
Outstanding, end of period | 98,726 | $15.31 | ||
Options exercisable, end of period | 98,726 | $15.31 |
The weighted average remaining term for outstanding and exercisable stock options was 5.55 years at September 30, 2009. The aggregate intrinsic value at September 30, 2009 was $0 for both stock options outstanding and for stock options exercisable. The intrinsic value for stock options is calculated based on the exercise price of the underlying awards and the market price of the Company’s common stock as of the reporting date.
(4) Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share have been computed by dividing net income available for common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share have been computed the same as basic earnings per share, and assumes the conversion of outstanding vested stock options, warrants, and convertible preferred stock if dilutive. The following table reconciles the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the quarters ending September 30, 2009 and 2008.
10
Dollars in thousands, except per share data
Quarter ended September 30, 2009 | Quarter ended September 30, 2008 | |||||||
Income | Weighted Average Shares | Per Share Amount | Income | Weighted- Average Shares | Per Share Amount | |||
Basic earnings per common share | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ 327 | $ 197 | ||||||
Less: Dividends and accretion on preferred stock | (256) | (130) | ||||||
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ 71 | 1,968,777 | $ 0.03 | $ 67 | 1,968,677 | $0.03 | ||
Effect of dilutive securities | ||||||||
Convertible preferred stock | - | - | - | - | ||||
Stock options | - | - | - | - | ||||
Warrant | - | - | - | - | ||||
Diluted earnings per common share | ||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders and assumed conversions | $ 71 | 1,968,777 | $ 0.03 | $ 67 | 1,968,677 | $0.03 | ||
Dollars in thousands, except per share data | ||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 | Nine months ended September 30, 2008 | |||||||
Income | Weighted Average Shares | Per Share Amount | Income | Weighted- Average Shares | Per Share Amount | |||
Basic earnings per common share | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ (1,044) | $1,035 | ||||||
Less: Dividends and accretion on preferred stock | (764) | (389) | ||||||
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ (1,808) | 1,968,777 | $ (0.92) | $ 646 | 1,963,677 | $0.33 | ||
Effect of dilutive securities | ||||||||
Convertible preferred stock | - | - | - | - | ||||
Stock options | - | - | - | - | ||||
Warrant | - | - | - | - | ||||
Diluted earnings per common share | ||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders and assumed conversions | $ (1,808) | 1,968,777 | $ (0.92) | $ 646 | 1,963,677 | $0.33 |
Stock options for 98,726 and 139,133 shares of common stock, respectively, were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, because they are anti-dilutive. Convertible preferred shares of 568,750 and the common stock warrant of 254,218 shares are not included because they are anti-dilutive as of September 30, 2009 and 2008.
11
(5) Disclosures about Fair Value
ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, reflect a company’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions of fair value, and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The fair value of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (level 2 inputs). The Company does not have any Level 1 securities. Level 2 securities include certain U.S. agency bonds, collateralized mortgage and debt obligations, and certain municipal securities.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below.
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2009, Using (Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
September 30, 2009 | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
Carrying value | ||||
Assets: | ||||
Securities available-for-sale | ||||
U. S. government agencies | $16,042 | $16,042 | ||
State and municipal | $19,785 | $19,785 | ||
Mortgage-backed securities -residential | $2,206 | $2,206 | ||
Trust preferred security | $700 | $700 | ||
Total investment securities | $38,733 | - | $38,733 | - |
12
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008, Using (Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
December 31, 2008 | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
Carrying Value | ||||
Assets: | ||||
Securities available-for-sale | ||||
U. S. government agencies | $4,504 | $4,504 | ||
State and municipal | $19,042 | $19,042 | ||
Mortgage-backed securities -residential | $15,582 | $15,582 | ||
Trust preferred security | $800 | $800 | ||
Total investment securities | $39,928 | - | $39,928 | - |
Assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis at September 30, 2009, consist of impaired loans and other real estate owned. Total impaired loans as of September 30, 2009 were $2.7 million, an increase of $131,000 million from June 30, 2009. Of the impaired loans at September 30, 2009, $2.6 million had specific allocations and were measured for impairment using the fair value of collateral for collateral dependent loans. The carrying value of $2.6 million, with a valuation allowance of $604,000 results in a fair value, net of related allowance, of $2.0 million at September 30, 2009. The change in valuation allowance for impaired loans was an increase of $192,000 and $29,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The carrying value of other real estate owned is $785,000. Total writedowns of other real estate owned during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $16,500 and $68,000, respectively. Impaired loans and other real estate owned were measured at fair value based on independent third-party appraisals of the underlying collateral adjusted for other factors management deemed relevant to arrive at a representative fair value and are considered level 3 inputs.
Total impaired loans at September 30, 2008 were $1.6 million. Of these loans, $1.4 million had specific allocations and were measured for impairment using the fair value of collateral for collateral dependent loans. The carrying value of $1.4 million, with a valuation allowance of $303,000 results in a fair value, net of related allowance, of $1.1 million at September 30, 2008. The change in valuation allowance for impaired loans was a decrease of $75,000 and $203,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. Impaired loans were measured at fair value based on independent third-party appraisals of the underlying collateral and are considered level 3 inputs.
13
Carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments, not previously presented, at September 30, 2009 were as follows:
September 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | |
Financial Assets | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 13,355 | $ 13,355 | $ 15,331 | $ 15,331 |
Loans held for sale | 2,877 | 2,877 | 553 | 553 |
Loans, net of allowance | 253,538 | 252,188 | 265,954 | 270,146 |
Accrued interest receivable | 2,090 | 2,090 | 2,358 | 2,358 |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 2,025 | n/a | 2,025 | n/a |
Financial Liabilities | ||||
Deposits | $ 275,774 | $ 276,567 | $ 273,015 | $ 276,473 |
Securities sold under repurchase agreements | 1,517 | 1,517 | 8,258 | 8,258 |
FHLB advances | 19,500 | 20,099 | 27,500 | 27,477 |
Subordinate debentures | 5,000 | 2,998 | 5,000 | 2,998 |
Accrued interest payable | 469 | 469 | 683 | 683 |
The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described as follows:
Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, interest bearing deposits, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short-term debt, and variable rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. Fair value of loans held for sale is based on market quotes. Fair value of debt is based on current rates for similar financing. The fair value of off-balance-sheet items is not considered material. It is not practicable to determine fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.
(6) | Investment Securities |
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of the available for sale investment securities portfolio at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and the corresponding amounts of gross unrealized gains and losses therein:
Amortized | Gross | Gross | Fair | |
Cost | Unrealized | Unrealized | Value | |
Gains | Losses | |||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
September 30, 2009 | ||||
U. S. government agencies | $ 16,016 | $30 | $ (4) | $16,042 |
State and municipal | 19,065 | 732 | (12) | 19,785 |
Mortgage-backed securities –residential | 2,131 | 75 | - | 2,206 |
Trust preferred security | 1,861 | - | (1,161) | 700 |
Total investment securities | $39,073 | $837 | $(1,177) | $38,733 |
December 31, 2008 | ||||
U. S. government agencies | $4,470 | $34 | $- | $4,504 |
State and municipal | 19,362 | 155 | (475) | 19,042 |
Mortgage-backed securities – residential | 15,241 | 342 | (1) | 15,582 |
Trust preferred security | 1,860 | - | (1,060) | 800 |
Total investment securities | $40,933 | $531 | $(1,536) | $39,928 |
14
The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities at September 30, 2009 by contractual maturity were as follows. Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily mortgage-backed securities, are shown separately.
September 30, 2009 | ||
Available for Sale | ||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||
Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |
Due in one year or less | $ - | $ - |
Due from one to five years | 16,675 | 16,781 |
Due from five to ten years | 9,003 | 9,333 |
Due after ten years | 11,264 | 10,413 |
Mortgage-backed | 2,131 | 2,206 |
Total | $39,073 | $38,733 |
Securities with unrealized losses at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in continuous unrealized loss position, are as follows:
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||
Description of Securities | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||
September 30, 2009 | ||||||
U.S. government agencies | $ 1,994 | $ (4) | $ - | $ - | $ 1,994 | $ (4) |
State and municipal | 603 | (12) | - | - | 603 | (12) |
Trust preferred security | - | - | 700 | (1,161) | 700 | (1,161) |
Total temporarily impaired | $2,597 | $(16) | $700 | $(1,161) | $3,297 | $(1,177) |
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||
Description of Securities | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||
December 31, 2008 | ||||||
State and municipal | $8,964 | $(346) | $2,012 | $(129) | $10,976 | $(475) |
Mortgage-backed securities - residential | - | - | 290 | (1) | 290 | (1) |
Trust preferred security | 800 | (1,060) | - | - | 800 | (1,060) |
Total temporarily impaired | $9,764 | $(1,406) | $2,302 | $(130) | $12,066 | $(1,536) |
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale were $12.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Gross gains of $361,000 were realized on these sales during 2009. No securities were sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
There were no sales of securities available for sale for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
15
Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. Investment securities classified as available for sale are generally evaluated for OTTI under ASC Topic 320, “Investments - Debt and Equity Securities.”
In determining OTTI under the ASC Topic 320 model, management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company’s security portfolio consisted of $38.7 million fair value of securities, $3.3 million of which were in an unrealized loss position. The majority of unrealized losses are related to the Company’s trust preferred securities, as discussed below.
Current market conditions have allowed some increase in the fair market value of the investment portfolio at September 30, 2009; however, a full recovery has not yet occurred. No impairment charge is being taken as no loss of principal or interest is anticipated. All principal and interest payments are being received as scheduled. All rated securities are investment grade. For those that are not rated, the financial condition has been evaluated and no adverse conditions were identified related to repayment. Declines in fair value are a function of rates differences in the market and market illiquidity. The Company does not intend or is not expected to be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis.
The Company’s unrealized losses relate primarily to its investment in a single trust preferred security. The security is a single-issuer trust preferred that is not rated. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate the creditworthiness of the issuer. Based on the issuer’s continued profitability and strong capital position, we do not deem that there is credit loss. The decline in fair value is primarily attributable to temporary illiquidity and the financial crisis affecting these markets and not to the expected cash flows of the individual securities. We have evaluated the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer and expect to fully recover our cost basis. This security is not considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
16
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
Management’s discussion and analysis of Citizens First Corporation (the “Company”) is included to provide the shareholders with an expanded narrative of the Company’s results of operations, changes in financial condition, liquidity and capital adequacy. This narrative should be reviewed in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Forward-Looking Statements
The Company may from time to time make written or oral statements, including statements contained in this report, which may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The words “may”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “consider”, “plan”, “believe”, “seek”, “should”, “estimate”, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, but other statements may constitute forward-looking statements. These statements should be considered subject to various risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s belief as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management pursuant to “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company’s actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. Among the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially are economic conditions generally and in the market areas of the Company, a continuation or worsening of the current disruption in credit and other markets, goodwill impairment, overall loan demand, increased competition in the financial services industry which could negatively impact the Company’s ability to increase total earning assets, and retention of key personnel. Actions by the Department of the Treasury and federal and state bank regulators in response to changing economic conditions, changes in interest rates, loan prepayments by and the financial health of the Company’s borrowers, and other factors described in the reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission could also impact current expectations.
Results of Operations
The Company reported net income before dividends to preferred shareholders for the three months ended September 30, 2009 of $327,000 compared to net income of $197,000 in the third quarter of 2008. Net income available to common shareholders was $71,000 or, $0.03 per basic and diluted share this quarter, compared to net income available to common shareholders of $67,000, or $0.03 per basic and diluted common share for the third quarter of 2008. Net income for the year has been impacted negatively by further compression in the net interest margin, provision expense, and a FDIC insurance special assessment in addition to a normal increase in premiums.
The annualized return on average assets for the Company was (.40)% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to .38% for the previous year. The decline in return on average assets is primarily attributable to an increase in the provision in the second quarter of 2009 by $2.7 million over the second quarter of 2008. The Company’s annualized return on average equity was (3.52)% for the nine months ending September 30, 2009, compared to an annualized return of 3.65% for the nine months ending September 30, 2008.
During the third quarter, the Company completed a comprehensive reevaluation of its branch delivery model, which resulted in the decision to close and consolidate two branch locations and to restructure the Company’s workforce both at the branch level and in the administrative services area. As a result, during October, 2009 two branch closures were announced and seventeen positions were eliminated. The Company expects charges of approximately $425,000 during the fourth quarter of 2009, primarily due to severance payments and fixed asset expenses related to the branch closures. Additionally, the Company expects a reduction in operating expenses in 2010 of approximately $800,000 as a result of these actions.
It is expected that professional fees and other costs and expenses will increase in the fourth quarter as a result of an unsolicited tender offer for the Company’s common stock commenced in the fourth quarter.
17
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, the Company’s principal source of earnings, is the difference between the interest income generated by earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the total interest cost of the deposits and borrowings obtained to fund these assets. Factors that influence the level of net interest income include the volume of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, yields earned and rates paid, the level of non-performing loans and non-earning assets, and the amount of non-interest bearing deposits supporting earning assets.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, net interest income was $2.8 million, consistent with net interest income of $2.8 million for the comparable period in 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net interest income was $8.1 million, a decrease of $200,000 from net interest income of $8.3 million for the comparable period in 2008.
The net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis (“TE”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 3.57%, compared to 3.55% in 2008. The Company’s yield on earning assets (TE) for the current year was 5.69%, a decrease of 95 basis points from 6.64% in the same period a year ago. While the yield declined in most areas of earning assets, loans were the primary contributor, decreasing 95 basis points. A significant amount of loans were tied to the prime rate without a minimum interest rate provision, causing loans to reprice downward. However, we were able to lower the cost of funds in order to maintain the interest margin. The cost of funds for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 2.46%, a decrease of 92 basis points from 3.38% in the same period a year ago.
The following table sets forth for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income from average interest-earning assets and interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities and average yields and costs. Such yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented.
18
Average Consolidated Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||
Nine months ended September 30, | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
Average Balance | Income/ Expense | Average Rate | Average Balance | Income/ Expense | Average Rate | ||
Earning assets: | |||||||
Federal funds sold | $ 4,214 | $ 7 | .22% | $ 4,400 | $ 87 | 2.64% | |
Available-for-sale securities (1) | |||||||
Taxable | 22,683 | 608 | 3.58% | 22,946 | 875 | 5.09% | |
Nontaxable (1) | 19,330 | 857 | 5.93% | 18,808 | 833 | 5.92% | |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 2,025 | 71 | 4.69% | 1,970 | 79 | 5.36% | |
Loans (2) | 266,296 | 11,835 | 5.94% | 273,970 | 14,134 | 6.89% | |
Total interest earning assets | 314,548 | 13,378 | 5.69% | 322,094 | 16,008 | 6.64% | |
Non-interest earning assets | 33,447 | 40,789 | |||||
Total Assets | $ 347,995 | $ 362,883 | |||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | |||||||
Interest-bearing transaction accounts | $ 60,202 | $ 282 | .63% | $ 65,974 | $ 453 | .92% | |
Savings accounts | 8,915 | 20 | .30% | 7,727 | 31 | .54% | |
Time deposits | 166,759 | 3,993 | 3.20% | 192,820 | 6,117 | 4.24% | |
Total interest-bearing deposits | 235,876 | 4,295 | 2.43% | 266,521 | 6,601 | 3.31% | |
Short-term borrowings | 17 | 0 | 0.00% | 353 | 8 | 3.03% | |
Securities sold under repurchase agreements | 4,572 | 96 | 2.81% | 5,330 | 101 | 2.53% | |
FHLB borrowings | 24,993 | 491 | 2.63% | 17,533 | 549 | 4.18% | |
Subordinated debentures | 5,000 | 103 | 2.75% | 5,000 | 191 | 5.10% | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | 270,458 | 4,985 | 2.46% | 294,737 | 7,450 | 3.38% | |
Non-interest bearing deposits | 35,999 | 27,367 | |||||
Other liabilities | 1,867 | 2,856 | |||||
Total liabilities | 308,324 | 324,960 | |||||
Stockholders’ equity | 39,671 | 37,923 | |||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | $ 347,995 | $ 362,883 | |||||
Net interest income | $ 8,393 | $ 8,558 | |||||
Net interest spread (1) | 3.23% | 3.26% | |||||
Net interest margin (1) (3) | 3.57% | 3.55% | |||||
Return on average assets ratio | (.40%) | .38% | |||||
Return on average equity ratio | (3.52%) | 3.65% | |||||
Average equity to assets ratio | 11.40% | 10.45% | |||||
_______________ |
(1) Income and yield stated at a tax equivalent basis for nontaxable securities using the marginal corporate Federal tax rate of 34.0%
(2) Average loans include nonperforming loans. Interest income includes interest and fees on loans, but does not include interest on loans on non-accrual.
(3) Net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
19
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on net interest income of the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Information is provided with respect to (1) effects on interest income attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate) and (2) effects on interest income attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). Changes attributable to the combined input of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate.
Nine Months Ended | ||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | September 30, | |||||
2009 vs. 2008 | ||||||
Variance Attributed to | ||||||
Rate | Volume | Net | ||||
Interest-earning assets: | ||||||
Federal funds sold | $(76) | $ (4) | $ (80) | |||
Available-for-sale-securities: | ||||||
Taxable | (256) | (11) | (267) | |||
Nontaxable (1) | 1 | 23 | 24 | |||
FHLB stock | (9) | 1 | (8) | |||
Loans, net | (1,899) | (400) | (2,299) | |||
Total net change in income on earning assets | (2,239) | (391) | (2,630) | |||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||
Interest-bearing transaction accounts | (131) | (40) | (171) | |||
Savings accounts | (16) | 5 | (11) | |||
Time deposits | (1,298) | (826) | (2,124) | |||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements | 9 | (14) | (5) | |||
FHLB borrowings | (291) | 233 | (58) | |||
Short-term borrowings | 0 | (8) | (8) | |||
Subordinated debentures | (88) | 0 | (88) | |||
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities | (1,815) | (650) | (2,465) | |||
Net change in net interest income | $ (424) | $ 259 | $ (165) | |||
Percentage change | (256.97)% | (156.97)% | 100.0% |
______________
(1) Income stated at a fully tax equivalent basis using the marginal corporate Federal tax rate of 34.0%.
Provision for Loan Losses
We have established an allowance for loan losses through a provision for loan losses charged as an expense on our statement of operations. We review our loan portfolio periodically to evaluate our outstanding loans and to measure both the performance of the portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Please see the discussion below under “Asset Quality and the Allowance for Loan Losses.”
The provision for loan losses for the third quarter of 2009 was $300,000, or 0.11% of average loans, compared to $575,000, or 0.21% of average loans for the third quarter of 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the provision for loan losses was $3.5 million and $852,000, respectively. The increase in the provision expense is reflective of the charge-off of previously classified loans that have experienced further deterioration in the current economic environment. Non-performing assets totaled $3.5 million at September 30, 2009, compared to $3.7 million at December 31, 2008, a decrease of $200,000. The decrease in non-performing assets can be attributed primarily to the sale of other real estate owned since December 31, 2008.
20
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, was $676,000 and $792,000, a decrease of $116,000, or 14.6%. Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $100,000, or 22.1%, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the same period for 2008 due primarily to a decline in NSF fees.
Non-interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, was $2,349,000 and $2,169,000, an increase of $180,000, or 8.3%. Included in non-interest income for the first nine months of 2009 is a decrease in lease income of $58,000, or 32.8%, resulting from the loss of a tenant in the Company’s main office building due to the tenant’s termination of the lease agreement. Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $231,000 for the first nine months of 2009, or 18.9%, as compared to the first nine months of 2008 due primarily to a reduction in NSF fees. Gain on the sale of mortgage loans increased $44,000, or 20.6%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the same period for 2008, as mortgage lending increased primarily as a result of first time home buyer tax credits. With lower mortgage rates, home refinancings have also increased.
The following table shows the detailed components of non-interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to September 30, 2008:
( Dollars in thousands) | September 30, 2009 | September 30, 2008 | Increase (Decrease) |
Service charges on deposit accounts | $994 | $1,225 | $(231) |
Gain on the sale of mortgage loans held for sale | 258 | 214 | 44 |
Lease income | 119 | 177 | (58) |
Gain on the sale of investments | 361 | - | 361 |
BOLI income | 226 | 224 | 2 |
Other income | 391 | 329 | 62 |
$2,349 | $2,169 | $ 180 |
Non-Interest Expense
Non-interest expense was $2.9 million in the third quarter of 2009, up from $2.8 million in the same quarter of 2008, an increase of $19,000, or ..7%. Professional fees increased $16,000, or 15.4%, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008. FDIC insurance increased $74,000 in the third quarter of 2009, or 137.0%, as compared to the same period for 2008. The second quarter of 2009 included a 5 basis point special assessment in addition to the increased premiums implemented in 2009 to replenish the deposit insurance fund.
Non-interest expense was $9.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, up from $8.4 million in the same period of 2008. Occupancy expense increased $52,000 due to a new branch opening in the first quarter of 2009. Professional fees increased $152,000 or 51.4%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the same period for 2009. FDIC insurance increased $344,000 for the first nine months of 2009 as compared to the first nine months of 2008 due to the increased FDIC assessments which were significantly impacted by the special assessment in the second quarter. While not announced, additional FDIC special assessments may be necessary in future periods.
The Company accounts for its employee and non-employee stock option plans under the recognition and measurement principles of ASC Topic 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation.” ASC Topic 718 requires the recognition of stock-based compensation for the number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. For the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, compensation expense recorded was $0 and $29,000, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, compensation expense recorded was $13,000 and $87,000, respectively. Stock option compensation expense ended in the first quarter of 2009 as all options fully vested.
21
The increases (decreases) in expense by major categories are as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to September 30, 2008:
Dollars in thousands | September 30, 2009 | September 30, 2008 | Increase (Decrease) |
Salaries and employee benefits | $4,092 | $4,000 | $92 |
Net occupancy expense | 1,010 | 958 | 52 |
Equipment expense | 569 | 577 | (8) |
Advertising | 340 | 360 | (20) |
Professional fees | 448 | 296 | 152 |
Data processing services | 501 | 546 | (45) |
Franchise shares and deposit tax | 365 | 345 | 20 |
FDIC Insurance | 489 | 145 | 344 |
Core deposit intangible amortization | 207 | 220 | (13) |
Postage and office supplies | 165 | 140 | 25 |
Telephone and other communication | 149 | 193 | (44) |
Other operating expenses | 646 | 610 | 36 |
$8,981 | $8,390 | $591 |
Income Taxes
Income tax expense has been calculated based on the Company’s anticipated effective tax rate for 2009. During the third quarter of 2009, income tax (benefit) expense totaled $31,000, compared to $(24,000) for the same period of 2008. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2009 was 8.7%, compared to (13.9%) for 2008. Income tax (benefit) expense for the first nine months of 2009 was $(987,000), compared to $167,000 for the first nine months of 2008. The effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2009 was (48.6%), compared to 13.9% for 2008. The decrease is related to the pre tax loss, and also impacted by the fact that income on tax-exempt securities and earnings from company-owned life insurance has remained consistent.
We evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis as warranted. In performing our analysis, we consider all information currently available, both positive and negative, in determining whether the deferred tax asset will be realized. We establish a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that a recorded tax benefit is not expected to be realized. At this time, we have determined that a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets is not considered necessary, as we are able to carryback approximately $500,000 of our deferred tax asset and expect to generate taxable income in future years. As a result of the Company’s actions in October to reduce operating expenses, the Company determined that future taxable income will be available to absorb existing deferred tax assets, so all tax benefits from operating losses in 2009 have been recognized.
The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return and a Kentucky franchise and Tennessee income tax return. These returns are subject to examination by taxing authorities for all years after 2004.
Balance Sheet Review
Overview
Total assets at September 30, 2009 were $341.7 million, down from $355.1 million at December 31, 2008, a decrease of $13.4 million, or 3.8%. Loans decreased $12.3 million and federal funds sold increased $1.2 million. Available-for-sale securities decreased $1.2 million. Deposits increased by $2.8 million from the prior year end and FHLB borrowings decreased $8.0 million.
Loans
At September 30, 2009, gross loans totaled $259.4 million, compared to $271.7 million at December 31, 2008, a decrease of $12.3 million, or 4.5%. Total loans, net of the allowance for loan losses, averaged $262.6 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared to $270.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $8.2 million, or 3.0%. The Company experienced loan declines in the first nine months of the year compared to year-end, primarily in commercial, agricultural, and commercial real estate loans. While the Company continues to generate new loan originations, the Company has experienced payoffs on loans whose pricing did not contribute positively to the overall net interest margin. In addition, $2.6 million of participation loans purchased by the
22
Company were bought back due to low loan demand at the originating institutions. The following table presents a summary of the loan portfolio by category:
(Dollars in thousands) | September 30, | % of | December 31, | % of |
2009 | Total Loans | 2008 | Total Loans | |
Commercial and agricultural | $74,539 | 28.74% | $79,248 | 29.16% |
Commercial real estate | 102,502 | 39.51% | 104,043 | 38.29% |
Residential real estate | 70,876 | 27.32% | 74,027 | 27.24% |
Consumer | 11,491 | 4.43% | 14,427 | 5.31% |
$259,408 | 100.00% | $271,745 | 100.00% |
Substantially all of the Company’s loans are to customers located in Warren, Simpson, Hart and Barren counties in Kentucky. As of September 30, 2009, the Company’s 20 largest credit relationships consisted of loans and loan commitments ranging from $1.7 million to $5.2 million. The aggregate amount of these credit relationships was $53.9 million.
The following table sets forth the maturity distribution of the loan portfolio as of September 30, 2009. Maturities are based on contractual terms. The Company’s policy is to specifically review and approve all loans renewed; loans are not automatically rolled over.
Loan Maturities | ||||
September 30, 2009 | Within One Year | After One But Within Five Years | After Five Years | Total |
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||
Commercial and agricultural | $ 33,610 | $29,308 | $11,621 | $ 74,539 |
Commercial real estate | 29,318 | 34,498 | 38,686 | 102,502 |
Residential real estate | 3,918 | 17,354 | 49,604 | 70,876 |
Consumer | 2,860 | 8,214 | 417 | 11,491 |
Total | $69,706 | $89,374 | $100,328 | $259,408 |
Asset Quality and the Allowance for Loan Losses
Asset quality is considered by management to be of primary importance, and the Company employs two full-time internal credit review officers to monitor adherence to the lending policy during the loan review and to take appropriate actions where warranted. The following table sets forth selected asset quality measures and ratios for the periods indicated.
September 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |
(Dollars in thousands) | ||
Non-performing loans | $ 2,698 | $2,550 |
Non-performing assets | 3,482 | 3,733 |
Allowance for loan losses | 3,777 | 3,816 |
Non-performing assets to total loans | 1.34% | 1.37% |
Non-performing assets to total assets | 1.02% | 1.03% |
Net charge-offs to average total loans | 1.36% | .48% |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans | 139.90% | 149.65% |
Allowance for loan losses to total loans | 1.46% | 1.40% |
Non-performing loans are defined as non-accrual loans, loans accruing but past due 90 days or more, and restructured loans. Non-performing assets are defined as non-performing loans, other real estate owned, and repossessed assets. The non-performing loans at September 30, 2009 consisted of $2.4 million of non-accrual loans
23
and $307,000 of loans past due 90 days or more. Of the non-accrual loans, $655,000 are loans secured by real estate in the process of collection, $148,000 are loans secured by real estate not in foreclosure, $1.5 million are commercial loans, and $50,000 are consumer loans in the process of collection. The $307,000 of loans past due 90 days or more include two residential real estate loans totaling $46,000, two commercial loans totaling $234,000, and four consumer loans totaling $26,000. These past due loans are in varying stages of collection and no future losses have been identified at this time. Other non-performing assets include $785,000 in other real estate.
Of the $2.6 million in non-performing loans at December 31, 2008, $1.1 million represented 10 non-accrual loans, and 26 loans over 90 days past due totaling $1.5 million. Loans over 90 days past due which are still accruing either have adequate collateral or a definite repayment plan in place. Non-performing assets also included other real estate owned of one commercial property of $574,000 and four residential real estate properties totaling $608,000.
Loans are placed on a non-accrual basis when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more and the loan is not adequately collateralized and is in the process of collection, or when, in the opinion of management, principal or interest is not likely to be paid in accordance with the terms of the obligation. Non-accrual loans are not reclassified as accruing until principal and interest payments are brought current and future payments appear reasonably certain. Loans are categorized as restructured if the original interest rate, repayment terms, or both were restructured due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. However, restructured loans that demonstrate performance under the restructured terms and that yield a market rate of interest may be removed from restructured status in the year following the restructure. Consumer loans are charged off after 120 days of delinquency unless adequately secured and in the process of collection.
Loans that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review. Where appropriate, reserves are allocated to individual loans based on management’s estimate of the borrower’s ability to repay the loan given the availability of collateral, other sources of cash flow and legal options available to the Company. Included in the review of individual loans are those that are impaired as provided in ASC Topic 310, “Receivables.” The Company evaluates the collectibility of both principal and interest when assessing the need for a loss accrual. Historical loss rates are applied to other loans not subject to reserve allocations. These historical loss rates may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition. Factors which management considers in the analysis include the effects of the national and local economies, trends in the nature and volume of loans (delinquencies, charge-offs and nonaccrual loans), changes in mix, asset quality trends, risk management and loan administration, changes in internal lending policies and credit standards, and examination results from bank regulatory agencies and the Company’s internal credit examiners. Reserves on individual loans and historical loss rates are reviewed quarterly and adjusted as necessary based on changing borrower and/or collateral conditions and actual collection and charge-off experience.
The following table sets forth an analysis of the Company’s allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
Summary of Loan Loss Experience
September 30, 2009 | September 30, 2008 | |
(Dollars In thousands) | ||
Balance, beginning of year | $3,816 | $3,194 |
Provision for loan losses | 3,500 | 852 |
Amounts charged off: | ||
Commercial | (2,612) | (432) |
Commercial real estate | (555) | (16) |
Residential real estate | (151) | (304) |
Consumer | (300) | (90) |
Total loans charged off: | (3,618) | (842) |
Recoveries of amounts previously charged off: | ||
Commercial | 59 | 13 |
Commercial real estate | - | - |
Residential real estate | 17 | 13 |
Consumer | 3 | 16 |
Total recoveries | 79 | 42 |
Net (charge-offs) recoveries | (3,539) | (800) |
Balance, end of period | $3,777 | $3,246 |
24
The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan category at the dates indicated. This allocation is not intended to suggest how actual losses may occur.
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Loss | |||||||
September 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | September 30, 2008 | |||||
Amount | % of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Amount | % of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Amount | % of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | ||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||
Residential real estate | $ 818 | 27.32% | $ 823 | 27.24% | $ 900 | 27.18% | |
Consumer and other loans | 176 | 4.43% | 340 | 5.31% | 228 | 5.29% | |
Commercial and agriculture | 1,781 | 28.74% | 1,641 | 29.16% | 1,162 | 28.98% | |
Commercial real estate | 886 | 39.51% | 830 | 38.29% | 678 | 38.55% | |
Unallocated | 116 | 0.00% | 182 | 0.00% | 278 | 0.00% | |
Total allowance for loan losses | $ 3,777 | 100.00% | $ 3,816 | 100.00% | $ 3,246 | 100.00% |
The Company believes that the allowance for loan losses of $3.8 million at September 30, 2009 is adequate to absorb probable incurred credit losses in the loan portfolio as of that date. That determination is based on the best information available to management, but necessarily involves uncertainties and matters of judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision and could be susceptible to significant change in the future. In addition, bank regulatory authorities, as a part of their periodic examinations, may reach different conclusions about the quality of our loan portfolio and the level of the allowance, which could require us to make additional provisions in the future. The Company has an unallocated amount within our allowance for loan losses that fluctuates from period to period due to the trends in the loan portfolio.
Securities
The investment securities portfolio is comprised primarily of U.S. Government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, and tax-exempt securities of states and political subdivisions. The purchase of nontaxable obligations of states and political subdivisions is a part of managing the Company’s effective tax rate. Securities are all classified as available-for-sale, and averaged $42.0 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared to $41.8 million for 2008. The table below presents the carrying value of securities by major category.
September 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |
(Dollars in thousands) | ||
U.S. Government agencies | $ 16,042 | $ 4,504 |
Mortgage-backed securities | 2,206 | 15,582 |
Municipal securities | 19,785 | 19,042 |
Trust preferred security | 700 | 800 2,000,249 |
Total available-for-sale securities | $ 38,733 | $ 39,928 |
The table below presents the maturities and yield characteristics of securities as of September 30, 2009. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
25
September 30, 2009 | Over | Over | ||||
(Dollars in thousands) | One Year | Five Years | Over | |||
One Year | Through | Through | Ten | Total | Market | |
or Less | Five Years | Ten Years | Years | Maturities | Value | |
U.S. Government agencies | $ - | $ 15,019 | $ 997 | $ - | $ 16,016 | $ 16,042 |
Mortgage-backed securities:(1) | - | 2,131 | - | - | 2,131 | 2,206 |
Municipal securities | - | 1,656 | 8,006 | 9,403 | 19,065 | 19,785 |
Trust preferred security | - | - | - | 1,861 | 1,861 | 700 |
Total available- for sale -securities | $ - | $ 18,806 | $ 9,003 | $ 11,264 | $ 39,073 | $ 38,733 |
Percent of total | 0.0% | 48.1% | 23.1% | 28.8% | 100.0% | |
Weighted average yield(2) | 2.39% | 5.21% | 6.01% | 4.10% |
_______________
(1) Mortgage-backed securities are grouped into average lives based on September 2009 prepayment projections.
(2) The weighted average yields are based on amortized cost and municipal securities are calculated on a fully tax- equivalent basis.
Current market conditions have allowed an increase in the fair market value of the investment portfolio at September 30, 2009. However, the total portfolio has not yet recovered. The primary decline in market value stems from one single issue trust preferred security which has declined due to inactivity in the market. No impairment charge is being taken as no loss of principal is anticipated and all principal and interest payments are being received as scheduled. All rated securities are investment grade. For those that are not rated, the financial condition has been evaluated and no adverse conditions were identified related to repayment. Declines in fair value are a function of rates changes in the market and market illiquidity. The Company does not intend to sell these securities and does not believe it will be required to sell these securities.
Deposits
The Company’s primary source of funding for its lending and investment activities results from customer and brokered deposits. As of September 30, 2009, total deposits were $275.8 million, compared to total deposits of $273.0 million at December 31, 2008, an increase of $2.8 million or 1.0%.
Total deposits averaged $271.9 million during the first nine months of 2009, a decrease of $22.0 million, or 7.5%, compared to $293.9 million in 2008. Time deposits of $100,000 or more averaged $67.2 million and $75.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively. Interest expense on time deposits of $100,000 or more was $1.9 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared to $2.6 million for the first nine months of 2008. The average cost of time deposits greater than $100,000 for the nine months ending September 30, 2009, and 2008, was 3.73% and 4.66%, respectively. The following table shows the maturities of time deposits greater than $100,000 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Maturity of Time Deposits of $100,000 or more | |||
(Dollars in thousands) | September 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |
Three months or less | $9,857 | $9,118 | |
Over three through six months | 10,432 | 20,842 | |
Over six through twelve months | 30,351 | 16,028 | |
Over one year through three years | 21,016 | 20,225 | |
Over three years through 5 years | 4,643 | 10,127 | |
Over five years | - | - | |
Total | $76,299 | $76,340 |
Borrowings
FHLB Advances. We obtain advances from the Federal Home Bank of Cincinnati (FHLB) for funding and liability management. These advances are collateralized by a blanket agreement of eligible 1-4 family residential mortgage
26
loans and eligible commercial real estate. Rates vary based on the term to repayment, and are summarized below as of September 30, 2009:
(Dollars in thousands) | |||
Type | Maturity | Rate | Amount |
Fixed | October 22, 2009 | 4.49% | 2,000 |
Fixed | November 24, 2009 | 0.25% | 6,000 |
Fixed | November 30, 2009 | 4.00% | 3,000 |
Fixed | February 16, 2010 | 5.11% | 2,000 |
Fixed | August 28, 2012 | 4.25% | 500 |
Fixed | December 24, 2012 | 3.36% | 2,000 |
Fixed | December 24, 2014 | 3.46% | 2,000 |
Fixed | February 25, 2015 | 2.85% | 2,000 |
$19,500 |
At September 30, 2009, we had available collateral to borrow an additional $19.1 million from the FHLB.
Other Borrowings.
At September 30, 2009, we had established Federal Funds lines of credit totaling $14.6 million with three correspondent banks. No amounts were drawn as of September 30, 2009.
Repurchase agreements mature in one business day. The rate paid on these accounts is variable at the Bank’s discretion and is based on a tiered balance calculation. During the third quarter of 2008 the Bank was awarded a bid for a public school construction account for $10 million that was included in the repurchase agreement balance at a fixed rate. By September 30, 2009, all of the $10 million public fund repurchase agreement had been withdrawn. Information regarding federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements as of September 30, 2009, is presented below.
(Dollars in thousands) | |
September 30, 2009 | |
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements: | |
Balance at period end | $1,517 |
Weighted average rate at period end | 2.01% |
Average balance during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 | $4,589 |
Weighted average rate for the nine months ending September 30, 2009 during the year | 2.81% |
Maximum month-end balance | $6,878 |
We issued $5.0 million in subordinated debentures in October, 2006 in conjunction with the acquisition of Kentucky Banking Centers. These trust preferred securities bear an interest rate, which reprices each calendar quarter, of 165 basis points over 3-month LIBOR (London Inter Bank Offering Rate). The rate as of September 30, 2009 was 2.25%. The subordinated debentures may be included with tier 1 capital (with certain limitations) under current regulatory guidelines.
Liquidity
To maintain a desired level of liquidity, the Company has several sources of funds available. The Company primarily relies upon net inflows of cash from financing activities, supplemented by net inflows of cash from operating activities, to provide cash used in its investing activities. As is typical of most banking companies, significant financing activities include issuance of common stock, deposit gathering, and the use of short-term borrowing facilities, such as federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements. The Company’s primary investing activities include purchases of securities and loan originations, offset by maturities, prepayments and sales of securities, and loan and dividend payments.
The Company’s objective as it relates to liquidity is to ensure that it has funds available to meet deposit withdrawals and credit demands without unduly penalizing profitability. The Company’s asset and liability management committee meets monthly and monitors the composition of the balance sheet to ensure comprehensive management of interest rate risk and liquidity.
27
Capital Resources
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory – and possibly additional discretionary – actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on the financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under the regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgements by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets and to total average assets. The Company’s capital ratios (calculated in accordance with regulatory guidelines) were as follows:
September 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | Regulatory Minimum | |
Tier I leverage ratio | 11.01% | 11.31% | 4.00% |
Tier I risk-based capital ratio | 13.05% | 13.52% | 4.00% |
Total risk-based capital ratio | 14.30% | 14.77% | 8.00% |
The Bank’s capital ratios (calculated in accordance with regulatory guidelines) were as follows:
September 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | Regulatory Minimum | “Well-capitalized” Minimum | |
Tier I leverage ratio | 9.48% | 9.68% | 4.00% | 5.00% |
Tier I risk-based capital ratio | 11.24% | 11.53% | 4.00% | 6.00% |
Total risk-based capital ratio | 12.49% | 12.78% | 8.00% | 10.00% |
At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company and the Bank were categorized as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. The Company’s capital ratios decreased at September 30, 2009 due to the net loss in the second quarter of 2009 and an increase in the amount of tax credit disallowed for Tier 1 capital purposes.
During the third quarter of 2004, we completed the private placement of 250 shares of Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock at a stated value of $31,992 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $7,998,000. The preferred stock is entitled to quarterly cumulative dividends at an annual fixed rate of 6.5% and is convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion price per share of $14.06.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, 250 shares of Series A preferred stock, at a stated value of $35,116 per share, were issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with the TARP Capital Purchase Program for a purchase price of $8,779,000. The Series A preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes and ranks senior to common stock and pari passu with the Company’s cumulative convertible preferred stock. This cumulative preferred stock pays a 5% annual dividend, increasing to 9% after 5 years.
28
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company uses a simulation model as a tool to monitor and evaluate interest rate risk exposure. The model is designed to measure the sensitivity of net interest income and net income to changing interest rates over future time periods. Forecasting net interest income and its sensitivity to changes in interest rates requires the Company to make assumptions about the volume and characteristics of many attributes, including assumptions relating to the replacement of maturing earning assets and liabilities. Other assumptions include, but are not limited to, projected prepayments, projected new volume, and the predicted relationship between changes in market interest rates and changes in customer account balances. These effects are combined with the Company’s estimate of the most likely rate environment to produce a forecast of net interest income and net income. The forecasted results are then adjusted for the effect of a gradual increase and decrease in market interest rates on the Company’s net interest income and net income. Because assumptions are inherently uncertain, the model cannot precisely estimate net interest income or net income or the effect of interest rate changes on net interest income and net income. Actual results could differ significantly from simulated results.
At September 30, 2009, the model indicated that if rates were to increase by 200 basis points during the remainder of the calendar year, then net interest income would increase 1.35% over the next twelve months. The model indicated that if rates were to decrease by 200 basis points over the same period, then net interest income would increase 3.18%. Net interest income would increase at a slower pace in the rising rate environment due to the increased cost of liabilities that would reprice during this time period compared to the assets which would not reprice in the same timeframe.
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, and have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective in all material respects to ensure that all material information required to be disclosed in this report has been made known to them in a timely fashion.
There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the Chief Executive Officer’s and Chief Financial Officer’s evaluation, nor were there any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the controls which required corrective action.
29
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits
EXHIBIT INDEX
3.1 | Restated Articles of Incorporation of Citizens First Corporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-103238)). |
3.2 | Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Citizens First Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3. 3 of the Registrant’s Form 10-QSB dated June 30, 2004). |
3.3 | Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Citizens First Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3. 1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed June 5, 2007). |
3.4 | Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Citizens First Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3. 1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed December 23, 2008). |
3.5 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Citizens First Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed April 27, 2009). |
4.1 | Restated Articles of Incorporation of Citizens First Corporation, as amended (see Exhibit 3.1). |
4.2 | Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Citizens First Corporation (see Exhibits 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4). |
4.3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Citizens First Corporation (see Exhibit 3.5). |
4.4 | Copy of Registrants’ Agreement Pursuant to Item 601(b) (4) (iii) (A) of Regulation S-K dated March 30, 2007 with respect to certain debt instruments (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant’s Form 10K-SB dated March 31, 2007). |
4.5 | Warrant to Purchase Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 23, 2008). |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350.
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350. |
30
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CITIZENS FIRST CORPORATION | ||
Date: | November 5, 2009 | /s/M. Todd Kanipe |
M. Todd Kanipe | ||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
(Principal Executive Officer) | ||
November 5, 2009 | /s/ Steve Marcum | |
Steve Marcum | ||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||
31