UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2010
Or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-33126
CITIZENS FIRST CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Kentucky | 61-0912615 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
1065 Ashley Street, Bowling Green, Kentucky | 42103 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(279) 393-0700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ | ||||
Accelerated filer ¨ | ||||
Non-accelerated filer ¨ | ||||
Smaller reporting company x |
1
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s class of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
1,968,777 shares of Common Stock, no par value, were outstanding at July 30, 2010.
2
CITIZENS FIRST CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||
ITEM 1 | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 4 |
ITEM 2 | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 20 |
ITEM 3 | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | 36 |
ITEM 4 | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 37 |
PART II – | OTHER INFORMATION | |
ITEM 6 | EXHIBITS | 38 |
SIGNATURES | 39 |
3
Part 1. Financial Information |
Item 1. Financial Statements
Citizens First Corporation | |||
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets Dollars in thousands | |||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||
Assets | |||
Cash and due from financial institutions | $5,794 | $6,619 | |
Federal funds sold | 4,439 | 3,137 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | 10,233 | 9,756 | |
Available for sale securities | 41,782 | 41,059 | |
Loans held for sale | 1,127 | 295 | |
Loans, net of allowance of $4,458 and $3,988 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively | 260,929 | 259,934 | |
Premises and equipment, net | 10,584 | 10,846 | |
Bank owned life insurance | 6,907 | 6,760 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost | 2,025 | 2,025 | |
Accrued interest receivable | 2,091 | 2,111 | |
Deferred income taxes | 3,843 | 3,888 | |
Goodwill | 2,575 | 2,575 | |
Core deposit intangible | 1,161 | 1,293 | |
Other assets | 3,668 | 3,689 | |
Total assets | $346,925 | $344,231 | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | |||
Liabilities | |||
Deposits: | |||
Non-interest bearing | $37,056 | $36,586 | |
Savings, NOW and money market | 70,455 | 75,244 | |
Time | 185,125 | 176,690 | |
Total deposits | 292,636 | 288,520 | |
Securities sold under repurchase agreements | 810 | 800 | |
FHLB advances | 8,500 | 11,500 | |
Subordinated debentures | 5,000 | 5,000 | |
Accrued interest payable | 418 | 440 | |
Other liabilities | 1,671 | 1,113 | |
Total liabilities | 309,035 | 307,373 | |
Stockholders' Equity: | |||
6.5% cumulative preferred stock, no par value; authorized 250 shares; liquidation preference of $7,998; issued and outstanding 250 shares at June 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009, respectively | 7,659 | 7,659 | |
5.0% Series A preferred stock; no par value; authorized 250 shares, liquidation preference of $8,779; issued and outstanding 250 shares at June 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009, respectively | 8,555 | 8,523 | |
Common stock, no par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 1,968,777 shares at June 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009, respectively | 27,072 | 27,072 | |
Accumulated deficit | (5,235) | (5,873) | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (161) | (523) | |
Total stockholders' equity | 37,890 | 36,858 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $346,925 | $344,231 | |
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements |
4
Citizens First Corporation Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations Dollars in thousands, except per share data | |||
Three months ended June 30, | |||
2010 | 2009 | ||
Interest and dividend income | |||
Loans | $4,096 | $3,848 | |
Taxable securities | 149 | 196 | |
Non-taxable securities | 183 | 189 | |
Federal funds sold and other | 27 | 24 | |
Total interest and dividend income | 4,455 | 4,257 | |
Interest expense | |||
Deposits | 1,245 | 1,422 | |
FHLB advances | 55 | 169 | |
Subordinated debentures | 25 | 36 | |
Short-term borrowings | 2 | 34 | |
Total interest expense | 1,327 | 1,661 | |
Net interest income | 3,128 | 2,596 | |
Provision for loan losses | 450 | 2,900 | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 2,678 | (304) | |
Non-interest income | |||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 440 | 340 | |
Other service charges and fees | 96 | 101 | |
Gain on sale of mortgage loans | 62 | 83 | |
Lease income | 29 | 38 | |
BOLI income | 73 | 75 | |
Gain on the sale of investments | 0 | 361 | |
Other income | 44 | 34 | |
Total non-interest income | 744 | 1,032 | |
Non-interest expenses | |||
Salaries and employee benefits | 1,121 | 1,460 | |
Net occupancy expense | 324 | 358 | |
Equipment expense | 164 | 197 | |
Advertising and public relations | 86 | 141 | |
Professional fees | 176 | 173 | |
Data processing services | 175 | 186 | |
Franchise shares and deposit tax | 129 | 124 | |
FDIC Insurance | 124 | 260 | |
Core deposit intangible amortization | 66 | 68 | |
Postage and office supplies | 37 | 60 | |
Telephone and other communication | 51 | 46 | |
Other real estate owned expenses | 24 | 27 | |
Other | 150 | 158 | |
Total non-interest expenses | 2,627 | 3,258 | |
Income/(loss) before income taxes | 795 | (2,530) | |
Provision/(benefit) for income taxes | 178 | (953) | |
Net income/(loss) | $ 617 | $(1,577) | |
Dividends declared and accretion on preferred stock | 256 | 256 | |
Net income (loss) available for common stockholders | $ 361 | $(1,833) | |
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ 0.18 | $ (0.93) | |
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements |
5
Citizens First Corporation Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations Dollars in thousands, except per share data | |||
Six months ended June 30, | |||
2010 | 2009 | ||
Interest and dividend income | |||
Loans | $8,065 | $7,866 | |
Taxable securities | 304 | 462 | |
Non-taxable securities | 366 | 377 | |
Federal funds sold and other | 53 | 51 | |
Total interest and dividend income | 8,788 | 8,756 | |
Interest expense | |||
Deposits | 2,489 | 2,998 | |
FHLB advances | 122 | 344 | |
Subordinated debentures | 48 | 74 | |
Short-term borrowings | 5 | 83 | |
Total interest expense | 2,664 | 3,499 | |
Net interest income | 6,124 | 5,257 | |
Provision for loan losses | 850 | 3,200 | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 5,274 | 2,057 | |
Non-interest income | |||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 766 | 641 | |
Other service charges and fees | 174 | 180 | |
Gain on sale of mortgage loans | 100 | 195 | |
Lease income | 67 | 81 | |
BOLI income | 147 | 150 | |
Gain on sale of investments | 0 | 361 | |
Other income | 80 | 65 | |
Total non-interest income | 1,334 | 1,673 | |
Non-interest expenses | |||
Salaries and employee benefits | 2,222 | 2,788 | |
Net occupancy expense | 634 | 674 | |
Equipment expense | 325 | 377 | |
Advertising and public relations | 133 | 227 | |
Professional fees | 292 | 328 | |
Data processing services | 383 | 322 | |
Franchise shares and deposit tax | 234 | 249 | |
FDIC Insurance | 248 | 361 | |
Core deposit intangible amortization | 132 | 138 | |
Postage and office supplies | 76 | 115 | |
Telephone and other communication | 94 | 100 | |
Other real estate owned expenses | 94 | 106 | |
Other | 302 | 334 | |
Total non-interest expenses | 5,169 | 6,119 | |
Income/(loss) before income taxes | 1,439 | (2,389) | |
Provision/(benefit) for income taxes | 291 | (1,018) | |
Net income/(loss) | $1,148 | $(1,371) | |
Dividends declared and accretion on preferred stock | 510 | 508 | |
Net income (loss) available for common stockholders | $ 638 | $(1,879) | |
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ 0.32 | $(0.95) | |
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements |
6
Citizens First Corporation | |||
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity Dollars in thousands | |||
Six months ended June 30, | |||
2010 | 2009 | ||
Balance January 1 | $36,858 | $39,285 | |
Net income/(loss) | 1,148 | (1,371) | |
Stock-based compensation | - | 13 | |
Payment of preferred dividends, $956 and $951 per share for 2010 and 2009 | (478) | (475) | |
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax | 362 | (337) | |
Balance at end of period | $37,890 | $37,115 | |
Citizens First Corporation | |||
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) Dollars in thousands | |||
Three months ended June 30, | |||
2010 | 2009 | ||
Net income/(loss) | $617 | $(1,577) | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | |||
Unrealized gain /(loss) on available for sale securities, net | 180 | (515) | |
Comprehensive income/(loss) | $797 | $(2,092) | |
Citizens First Corporation | |||
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) Dollars in thousands | |||
Six months ended June 30, | |||
2010 | 2009 | ||
Net income/(loss) | $ 1,148 | $ (1,371) | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | |||
Unrealized gain/(loss) on available for sale securities, net | 362 | (337) | |
Comprehensive income/(loss) | $1,510 | $(1,708) | |
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Citizens First Corporation Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Dollars in thousands | |||
Six months ended June 30 | |||
2010 | 2009 | ||
Operating activities: | |||
Net income/(loss) | $1,148 | $(1,371) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||
Depreciation and amortization | 392 | 421 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | - | 13 | |
Provision for loan losses | 850 | 3,200 | |
Amortization of premiums and discounts on securities | 19 | 57 | |
Amortization of core deposit intangible | 132 | 138 | |
Deferred income taxes | 45 | (1,037) | |
Sale of mortgage loans held for sale | 5,600 | 15,151 | |
Origination of mortgage loans for sale | (6,333) | (15,604) | |
Gain on the sale of securities available-for-sale | - | (361) | |
Loss/(Gain) on the sale of property plant and equipment | 10 | (10) | |
Gains on sales of loans | (100) | (195) | |
Net loss on sale of other real estate owned | 81 | 75 | |
Changes in: | |||
Interest receivable | 21 | 315 | |
Other assets | 85 | (85) | |
Interest payable and other liabilities | 350 | - | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 2,300 | 707 | |
Investing activities: | |||
Loan originations and payments, net | (2,268) | 6,849 | |
Purchases of premises and equipment | (141) | (530) | |
Purchase of available-for-sale securities | (16,040) | (18,592) | |
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities | 15,847 | 4,434 | |
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities | - | 12,278 | |
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned | 131 | 792 | |
Proceeds from disposal of property plant and equipment | - | 99 | |
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities | (2,471) | 5,330 | |
Financing activities: | |||
Net change in demand deposits, money market, NOW, and savings accounts | (4,319) | 8,981 | |
Net change in time deposits | 8,435 | (18,157) | |
Proceeds from FHLB advances | 7,800 | 14,000 | |
Repayment of FHLB advances | (10,800) | (13,500) | |
Net change in repurchase agreements | 10 | (4,831) | |
Dividends paid on preferred stock | (478) | (475) | |
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities | 648 | (13,982) | |
Increase/(Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 477 | (7,945) | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 9,756 | 15,331 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of quarter | $10,233 | $7,386 | |
Supplemental Cash Flows Information: | |||
Interest paid | $2,686 | $3,738 | |
Income taxes paid | $ - | $ - | |
Loans transferred to other real estate | $ 423 | $ 225 | |
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements |
8
Citizens First Corporation
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accounting and reporting policies of Citizens First Corporation (the “Company”) and its subsidiary, Citizens First Bank, Inc. (the “Bank”), conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and general practices within the banking industry. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Bank. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements are based on various factors including the current interest rate environment and the general strength of the local economy. Changes in the overall interest rate environment can significantly affect the Company’s net interest income and the value of its recorded assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates used in the prepara tion of the financial statements.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been reflected in the accompanying unaudited financial statements. Those adjustments consist only of normal recurring adjustments. Results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year. The consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of that date.
Note 2 - Reclassifications |
Certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated financial statements of prior periods to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications do not affect net income or total shareholders’ equity as previously reported.
Note 3 - Adoption of New Accounting Standards
ASU No. 2009-16 – Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) – Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. This Standard will require more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. It eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures, primarily relating to an entity’s continuing involvement with financial assets which have been transferred. This
9
Standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, or January 1, 2010, for a calendar year-end entity. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the results of operations or financial position.
ASU No. 2009-17 – Consolidations (Topic 810) – Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. This Statement requires a qualitative approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. This Statement requires ongoing reconsideration of whether (1) an entity is a VIE and (2) an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. It is expected that the amendments will result in more entities consolidating VIEs that previously were not consolidated. This Standard also requires additional d isclosures about an enterprise’s involvement in variable interest entities. This Standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, or January 1, 2010, for a calendar year-end entity. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the results of operations or financial position.
In 2002, the board of directors adopted the employee stock option plan, which became effective upon the approval of the Company’s shareholders at the annual meeting in April 2003. The purpose of the plan is to afford key employees the incentive to remain with the Company and to reward their service by providing the employees the opportunity to share in the Company’s future success. 132,300 shares of Company common stock have been reserved for issuance under the plan. 53,651 shares remain available for future issuance. Options granted expire after ten years, and vest ratably over a three year period.
In 2003, the board of directors adopted the non-employee director stock option plan for non-employee directors, which became effective upon the approval of the Company’s shareholders at the annual meeting in April 2003. The purpose of the plan is to assist the Company in promoting a greater identity of interest between the Company’s non-employee directors and shareholders, and in attracting and retaining non-employee directors by affording them an opportunity to share in the Company’s future successes. 44,100 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the plan. 29,835 shares remain available for future issuance. Options granted expire after ten years, and are immediately vested.
The fair value of options granted is estimated on the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. There were no options granted for the six month period ended June 30, 2010.
ASC718 requires the recognition of stock-based compensation for the number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, employee and non-employee compensation expense was $0 and $13,000. As of June 30, 2010, there is no unrecognized compensation expense associated with stock options.
10
A summary of the status of the plans at June 30, 2010, and changes during the period then ended is presented below:
2010 | |||
Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | ||
Outstanding, beginning of year | 91,260 | $15.22 | |
Granted | - | - | |
Exercised | - | - | |
Forfeited | - | - | |
Expired | - | - | |
Outstanding, end of period | 91,260 | $15.22 | |
Options exercisable, end of period | 91,260 | $15.22 |
The weighted average remaining term for outstanding and exercisable stock options was 4.78 years at June 30, 2010. The aggregate intrinsic value at June 30, 2010 was $0 for both stock options outstanding and exercisable. The intrinsic value for stock options is calculated based on the exercise price of the underlying awards and the market price of the Company’s common stock as of the reporting date.
Note 5 - Available-For-Sale Securities
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of the available for sale investment securities portfolio at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and the corresponding amounts of gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | |
June 30, 2010 | ||||
U. S. government agencies | $19,743 | $101 | $ - | $19,844 |
State and municipal | 18,696 | 554 | (19) | 19,231 |
Agency mortgage-backed securities: residential | 1,725 | 82 | - | 1,807 |
Trust preferred security | 1,862 | - | (962) | 900 |
Total investment securities | $42,026 | $737 | $(981) | $41,782 |
December 31, 2009 | ||||
U. S. government agencies | $19,178 | $14 | $(90) | $19,102 |
State and municipal | 18,809 | 441 | (54) | 19,196 |
Agency mortgage-backed securities: residential | 2,004 | 57 | - | 2,061 |
Trust preferred security | 1,861 | - | (1,161) | 700 |
Total investment securities | $41,852 | $512 | $(1,305) | $41,059 |
11
The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities at June 30, 2010 by contractual maturity were as follows. Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily mortgage-backed securities, are shown separately.
June 30, 2010 (Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
Available for Sale | ||||
Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||
Due in one year or less | $ 381 | $ 383 | ||
Due from one to five years | 8,536 | 8,709 | ||
Due from five to ten years | 20,425 | 20,743 | ||
Due after ten years | 10,959 | 10,140 | ||
Agency mortgage-backed: residential | 1,725 | 1,807 | ||
Total | $42,026 | $41,782 |
The following table summarizes the investment securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in continuous unrealized loss position:
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||
Description of Securities | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
June 30, 2010: | ||||||
State and municipal | $1,565 | $(7) | $ 602 | $ (12) | $2,167 | $ (19) |
Trust preferred security | - | - | 900 | (962) | 900 | (962) |
Total temporarily impaired | $1,565 | $(7) | $1,502 | $(974) | $3,067 | $(981) |
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||
Description of Securities | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
December 31, 2009: | ||||||
U.S. government agencies | $ 9,619 | $ (90) | $ - | $ - | $ 9,619 | $ (90) |
State and municipal | 1,887 | (54) | - | - | 1,887 | (54) |
Trust preferred security | - | - | 700 | (1,161) | 700 | (1,161) |
Total temporarily impaired | $11,506 | $(144) | $700 | $(1,161) | $12,206 | $(1,305) |
Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. Investment securities classified as available for sale are generally evaluated for OTTI under ASC Topic 320, “Investments - Debt and Equity Securities.”
12
In determining OTTI under the ASC Topic 320 model, management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time.
As of June 30, 2010, our securities portfolio consisted of $41.8 million fair value of securities, $3.1 million, or 8 securities, of which were in an unrealized loss position.
Current market conditions have allowed some increase in the fair market value of the investment portfolio at June 30, 2010; however, a full recovery has not yet occurred. No impairment charge is being taken as no loss of principal or interest is anticipated. All principal and interest payments are being received as scheduled. All rated securities are investment grade. For those that are not rated, the financial condition has been evaluated and no adverse conditions were identified related to repayment. Declines in fair value are a function of rates differences in the market and market illiquidity. We do not intend nor are we expected to be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis.
Our unrealized losses relate primarily to an investment in a single trust preferred security. The security is a single-issuer trust preferred that is not rated. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate the creditworthiness of the issuer, a bank holding company with operations in the state of Kentucky. Based on the issuer’s continued profitability and well-capitalized position, we do not deem that there is credit loss. The decline in fair value is primarily attributable to temporary illiquidity and the financial crisis affecting these markets and not to the expected cash flows of the individual security. We have evaluated the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer and expect to fully recover our cost basis. This security continues to pay interest as agreed and futu re payments are expected to be made as agreed. This security is not considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
Note 6 - Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses |
Categories of loans include:
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||
Commercial and agricultural | $74,861 | $74,944 | ||
Commercial real estate | 106,887 | 104,768 | ||
Residential real estate | 72,679 | 73,166 | ||
Consumer | 10,960 | 11,044 | ||
Total loans | 265,387 | 263,922 | ||
Less allowance for loan losses | (4,458) | (3,988) | ||
Net loans | $ 260,929 | $ 259,934 |
13
An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 follows:
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | |||
Balance, beginning of year, | $3,988 | $3,816 | ||
Provision charged to expense | 850 | 3,200 | ||
Loans charged off | (522) | (3,434) | ||
Recoveries | 142 | 75 | ||
Balance, end of period | $ 4,458 | $ 3,657 |
Information about impaired loans is as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||
Principal balance of impaired loans, | $450 | $ 1,230 | ||
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance | 362 | 1,085 | ||
Amount of valuation allowance | 92 | 256 | ||
Impaired loans with no valuation allowance | 88 | 145 | ||
Nonperforming loans were as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||
Loans past due 90 days or more still on accrual | $ 0 | $ 48 | ||
Non-accrual loans | 450 | 1,182 |
Note 7 - Disclosures about Fair Value
ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset orliability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1-Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
14
Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, reflect a company’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions of fair value, and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The fair value of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (level 2 inputs). The Company does not have any Level 1 securities. Level 2 securities include certain U.S. agency bonds, collateralized mortgage and debt obligations, and certain municipal securities.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below.
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2010, Using (Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
June 30, 2010 Carrying value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
Assets: | ||||
Securities available-for-sale | ||||
U. S. government agencies | $19,844 | $19,844 | ||
State and municipal | 19,231 | 19,231 | ||
Agency mortgage-backed securities -residential | 1,807 | 1,807 | ||
Trust preferred security | 900 | 900 | ||
Total investment securities | $41,782 | - | $41,782 | - |
15
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009, Using (Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
December 31, 2009 Carrying value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
Assets: | ||||
Securities available-for-sale | ||||
U. S. government agencies | $19,102 | $19,102 | ||
State and municipal | 19,196 | 19,196 | ||
Agency mortgage-backed securities -residential | 2,061 | 2,061 | ||
Trust preferred security | 700 | 700 | ||
Total investment securities | $41,059 | - | $41,059 | - |
Financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2010, Using (Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
June 30, 2010 Carrying value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
Impaired loans | $284 | $284 | ||
Other real estate owned, net | $1,365 | $1,365 |
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009, Using (Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
December 31, 2009 Carrying value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
Impaired loans | $1,076 | $1,076 | ||
Other real estate owned, net | $1,154 | $1,154 |
Impaired loans which are measured for impairment using the fair value of collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying value of $284,000 at June 30, 2010 with a valuation allowance of $74,000. Impaired loans had a carrying value of $1.1 million at December 31, 2009, with a valuation allowance of $252,000. Provision for loan losses of $32,000 and $54,000 were recognized for the three and six months ended June 30,
16
2010. No provision for loan losses was recognized for the three months ended June 30, 2009, while $104,000 was recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Other real estate owned, which is measured at the lower of carrying or fair value less costs to sell, had a net carrying value of $1.4 million at June 30, 2010 and $1.2 million at December 31, 2009. Total writedowns of other real estate owned year to date June 30, 2010 and 2009, were $80,000 and $51,000, respectively.
Carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments, not previously presented, at period end were as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | |||
Financial Assets | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $10,233 | $10,233 | $9,756 | $9,756 | ||
Loans held for sale | 1,127 | 1,144 | 295 | 295 | ||
Loans, net of allowance | 260,645 | 260,825 | 258,858 | 260,852 | ||
Accrued interest receivable | 2,091 | 2,091 | 2,111 | 2,111 | ||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 2,025 | N/A | 2,025 | N/A |
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | |||
Financial Liabilities | ||||||
Deposits | $292,636 | $294,176 | $288,520 | $288,871 | ||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements | 810 | 810 | 800 | 800 | ||
FHLB advances | 8,500 | 8,911 | 11,500 | 11,824 | ||
Subordinate debentures | 5,000 | 3,094 | 5,000 | 3,094 | ||
Accrued interest payable | 418 | 418 | 440 | 440 |
The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described as follows:
Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, interest bearing deposits, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short-term debt, and variable rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life. Loans are reported net of the allowance for loan losses. Fair value of loans held for sale is based on market quotes. Fair value of debt is based on current rates for similar financing. The fair value of off-balance-sheet items is not considered material. It is not practicable to determine fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.
17
Note 8 - Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share have been computed by dividing net income (loss) available for common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share have been computed the same as basic earnings (loss) per share, and assumes the conversion of outstanding stock options, convertible preferred stock, and warrants if dilutive. The following table reconciles the basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share computations for the quarters and six months ending June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Quarter ended June 30, 2010 | Quarter ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||
Income | Weighted Average Shares | Per Share Amount | Income/ (Loss) | Weighted- Average Shares | Per Share Amount | ||
Basic earnings per share | |||||||
Net income/(loss) | $ 617 | $(1,577) | |||||
Less: Dividends and accretion on preferred stock | (256) | (256) | |||||
Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders | $ 361 | 1,968,777 | $0.18 | $(1,833) | 1,968,777 | $(0.93) | |
Effect of dilutive securities | |||||||
Convertible preferred stock | - | - | - | - | |||
Stock options | - | - | - | - | |||
Warrants | - | 64,743 | - | - | |||
Diluted earnings per share | |||||||
Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders and assumed conversions | $361 | 2,033,520 | $0.18 | $(1,833) | 1,968,777 | $(0.93) | |
Six months ended June 30, 2010 | Six months ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||
Income | Weighted Average Shares | Per Share Amount | Income/ (Loss) | Weighted- Average Shares | Per Share Amount | ||
Basic earnings per share | |||||||
Net income/(loss) | $1,148 | $(1,371) | |||||
Less: Dividends and accretion on preferred stock | (510) | (508) | |||||
Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders | $ 638 | 1,968,777 | $0.32 | $(1,879) | 1,968,777 | $(0.95) | |
Effect of dilutive securities | |||||||
Convertible preferred stock | - | - | - | - | |||
Stock options | - | - | - | - | |||
Warrants | - | 49,420 | - | - | |||
Diluted earnings per share | |||||||
Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders and assumed conversions | $638 | 2,018,197 | $0.32 | $(1,879) | 1,968,777 | $(0.95) | |
18
Stock options for 91,260 and 139,133 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings (loss) per common share for June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, because they are anti-dilutive. Convertible preferred shares are not included because they are anti-dilutive as of June 30, 2010 and 2009. Common stock warrants totaled 254,218 shares, and were dilutive as of June 30, 2010, and included in the diluted earnings per share computation but were anti-dilutive for June 30, 2009, and were excluded from the computation.
19
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
Management’s discussion and analysis of Citizens First Corporation (the “Company”) is included to provide the shareholders with an expanded narrative of our results of operations, changes in financial condition, liquidity and capital adequacy. This narrative should be reviewed in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Forward-Looking Statements
We may from time to time make written or oral statements, including statements contained in this report, which may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The words “may”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “consider”, “plan”, “believe”, “seek”, “should”, “estimate”, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, but other statements may constitute forward-looking statements. These statements should be considered subject to various risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s belief as well as assum ptions made by, and information currently available to, management pursuant to “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. Among the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially are economic conditions generally and in our market areas, a continuation or worsening of the current disruption in credit and other markets, goodwill impairment, overall loan demand, increased competition in the financial services industry which could negatively impact our ability to increase total earning assets, and retention of key personnel. Actions by the Department of the Treasury and federal and state bank regulators in response to changing economic conditions, changes in interest rates, loan prepayments by and the financial healt h of our borrowers, and other factors described in the reports filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission could also impact current expectations.
Results of Operations
For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we reported net income of $617,000 compared to net loss of $(1,577,000) in the second quarter of 2009. Net income available to common shareholders was $361,000 or, $.18 per basic and diluted share this quarter, respectively, compared to a net loss attributable to common shareholders of $(1,833,000), or $(0.93) per basic and diluted common share for the second quarter of 2009. Net income increased as a result of improved net interest income, reduced provision for loan losses, and reduced operating expenses.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company reported net income of $1.1 million, or $.32 per common share. This represents an increase of $2.5 million, or $1.27 per share, from the net loss of ($1.4) million in the previous year. The increase in net income is primarily attributable to a decrease in the provision for loan losses of $2.4 million, an increase in net interest income of $867,000 and a decrease in non-interest expense of $950,000.
20
Our annualized return on average assets was .67% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to (.79)% for the previous year. Our annualized return on average equity was 6.17% for the six months ending June 30, 2010, compared to an annualized return of (6.79%) for the six months ending June 30, 2009. The improvement in the return on average assets and return on average equity is due to the improvement in net income.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, our principal source of earnings, is the difference between the interest income generated by earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the total interest cost of the deposits and borrowings obtained to fund these assets. Factors that influence the level of net interest income include the volume of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, yields earned and rates paid, the level of non-performing loans and non-earning assets, and the amount of non-interest bearing deposits supporting earning assets.
For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, net interest income was $3.1 million, an increase of $532,000, or 20.5%, from net interest income of $2.6 million for the comparable period in 2009. Net interest income increased as a result of lower interest expense on deposits and borrowings. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, net interest income was $6.1 million, an increase of $867,000, or 16.5%, from net interest income of $5.3 million for the comparable period in 2009.
The net interest margin (on a tax-equivalent basis) for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was 4.08%, compared to 3.44% in 2009. This increase of 64 basis points is attributable to the decline in the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Our yield on earning assets (tax equivalent) for the quarter was 5.76%, an increase of 19 basis points from 5.57% in the same period a year ago. The net interest margin(on a tax-equivalent basis) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was 4.06%, compared to 3.45% in 2009. This increase of 61 basis points is attributable to the decline in the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Our yield on earning assets (tax equivalent) for the current year was 5.77%, an increase of 10 basis points from 5.67% in the same period a year ago.
The following tables set forth for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income from average interest-earning assets and interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities and average yields and costs. Such yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented.
21
Average Consolidated Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||
Quarter ended June 30, | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Average Balance | Income/ Expense | Average Rate | Average Balance | Income/ Expense | Average Rate | ||
Earning assets: | |||||||
Federal funds sold | $ 6,167 | $5 | 0.31% | $ 3,381 | $ 1 | 0.12% | |
Available-for-sale securities (1) | |||||||
Taxable | 20,720 | 149 | 2.88% | 23,429 | 196 | 3.32% | |
Nontaxable (1) | 18,767 | 277 | 5.93% | 19,332 | 286 | 5.87% | |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 2,025 | 22 | 4.45% | 2,025 | 23 | 4.51% | |
Loans, net (2) | 269,058 | 4,096 | 6.11% | 262,137 | 3,848 | 5.82% | |
Total interest earning assets | 316,737 | 4,549 | 5.76% | 310,304 | 4,354 | 5.57% | |
Non-interest earning assets | 32,771 | 36,062 | |||||
Total Assets | $ 349,508 | $ 346,366 | |||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | |||||||
Interest-bearing transaction accounts | $ 65,205 | $ 91 | 0.57% | $ 61,018 | $ 96 | 0.62% | |
Savings accounts | 9,701 | 7 | 0.28% | 9,017 | 7 | 0.31% | |
Time deposits | 185,129 | 1,148 | 2.49% | 162,337 | 1,319 | 3.22% | |
Total interest-bearing deposits | 260,035 | 1,246 | 1.92% | 232,372 | 1,422 | 2.43% | |
Short-term borrowings | 34 | 0 | 0.00% | 48 | 0 | 0.00% | |
Securities sold under repurchase agreements | 962 | 1 | 0.94% | 4,731 | 34 | 2.85% | |
FHLB borrowings | 6,808 | 55 | 3.24% | 26,582 | 169 | 2.52% | |
Subordinated debentures | 5,000 | 25 | 1.97% | 5,000 | 36 | 2.86% | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | 272,839 | 1,327 | 1.95% | 268,733 | 1,661 | 2.45% | |
Non-interest bearing deposits | 37,222 | 36,396 | |||||
Other liabilities | 1,682 | 1,723 | |||||
Total liabilities | 311,743 | 306,852 | |||||
Stockholders’ equity | 37,765 | 39,514 | |||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | $ 349,508 | $ 346,366 | |||||
Net interest income | $ 3,222 | $ 2,693 | |||||
Net interest spread (1) | 3.81% | 3.12% | |||||
Net interest margin (1) (3) | 4.08% | 3.44% | |||||
Return on average assets ratio | 0.71% | (1.83%) | |||||
Return on average equity ratio | 6.55% | (16.01%) | |||||
Average equity to assets ratio | 10.81% | 11.41% | |||||
_______________ |
(1) Income and yield stated at a tax equivalent basis for nontaxable securities using the marginal corporate Federal tax rate of 34.0%
(2) Average loans include nonperforming loans. Interest income includes interest and fees on loans, but does not include interest on loans on non-accrual.
(3) Net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
22
Average Consolidated Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||
Six months ended June 30, | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Average Balance | Income/ Expense | Average Rate | Average Balance | Income/ Expense | Average Rate | ||
Earning assets: | |||||||
Federal funds sold | $ 5,219 | $8 | 0.29% | $ 4,764 | $ 5 | 0.21% | |
Available-for-sale securities (1) | |||||||
Taxable | 20,656 | 304 | 2.94% | 23,246 | 462 | 4.01% | |
Nontaxable (1) | 18,787 | 555 | 5.96% | 19,346 | 571 | 5.95% | |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 2,025 | 45 | 4.52% | 2,025 | 46 | 4.58% | |
Loans, net (2) | 266,972 | 8,065 | 6.09% | 269,105 | 7,866 | 5.89% | |
Total interest earning assets | 313,659 | 8,977 | 5.77% | 318,486 | 8,950 | 5.67% | |
Non-interest earning assets | 32,945 | 33,202 | |||||
Total Assets | $346,604 | $351,688 | |||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | |||||||
Interest-bearing transaction accounts | $ 65,220 | $ 181 | 0.57% | $ 60,257 | $ 188 | 0.63% | |
Savings accounts | 9,530 | 13 | 0.28% | 8,735 | 13 | 0.30% | |
Time deposits | 182,528 | 2,295 | 2.54% | 167,292 | 2,797 | 3.37% | |
Total interest-bearing deposits | 257,278 | 2,489 | 1.98% | 236,284 | 2,998 | 2.56% | |
Short-term borrowings | 18 | 0 | 0.00% | 25 | 0 | 0.00% | |
Securities sold under repurchase agreements | 936 | 5 | 0.94% | 5,760 | 83 | 2.91% | |
FHLB borrowings | 7,735 | 122 | 3.19% | 26,575 | 344 | 2.61% | |
Subordinated debentures | 5,000 | 48 | 1.92% | 5,000 | 74 | 2.98% | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | 270,967 | 2,664 | 1.98% | 273,644 | 3,499 | 2.58% | |
Non-interest bearing deposits | 36,427 | 35,457 | |||||
Other liabilities | 1,659 | 1,859 | |||||
Total liabilities | 309,053 | 310,960 | |||||
Stockholders’ equity | 37,551 | 40,728 | |||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | $346,604 | $351,688 | |||||
Net interest income | $ 6,313 | $5,451 | |||||
Net interest spread (1) | 3.79% | 3.09% | |||||
Net interest margin (1) (3) | 4.06% | 3.45% | |||||
Return on average assets ratio | 0.67% | (0.79)% | |||||
Return on average equity ratio | 6.17% | (6.79)% | |||||
Average equity to assets ratio | 10.83% | 11.58% | |||||
_______________ |
(1) Income and yield stated at a tax equivalent basis for nontaxable securities using the marginal corporate Federal tax rate of 34.0%
(2) Average loans include nonperforming loans. Interest income includes interest and fees on loans, but does not include interest on loans on non-accrual.
(3) Net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Information is provided with respect to (1) effects on interest income attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate) and (2) effects on interest income attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). Changes attributable to the combined input of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate.
23
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
2010 Vs. 2009 | ||||||
Increase (Decrease) Due to | ||||||
Rate | Volume | Net | ||||
Interest-earning assets: | ||||||
Federal funds sold | $ 3 | $ - | $ 3 | |||
Available-for-sale-securities: | ||||||
Taxable | (107) | (51) | (158) | |||
Nontaxable (1) | - | (16) | (16) | |||
FHLB stock | (1) | - | (1) | |||
Loans, net | 260 | (61) | 199 | |||
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets | 155 | (128) | 27 | |||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||
Interest-bearing transaction accounts | (22) | 15 | (7) | |||
Savings accounts | (1) | 1 | - | |||
Time deposits | (757) | 255 | (502) | |||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements | (8) | (70) | (78) | |||
Federal funds purchased | - | - | - | |||
FHLB borrowings | 22 | (244) | (222) | |||
Subordinated debentures | (26) | - | (26) | |||
Total net change in expense on nterest-bearing liabilities | (792) | (43) | (835) | |||
Net change in net interest income | $ 947 | $ (85) | $ 862 | |||
Percentage change | 109.86% | (9.86)% | 100.0% |
______________
(1) Income stated at a fully tax equivalent basis using the marginal corporate Federal tax rate of 34.0%.
Provision for Loan Losses
We have established an allowance for loan losses through a provision for loan losses charged as an expense on our statement of operations. We review our loan portfolio periodically to evaluate our outstanding loans and to measure both the performance of the portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Please see the discussion below under “Asset Quality and the Allowance for Loan Losses.”
The provision for loan losses for the second quarter of 2010 was $450,000, or 0.15% of average loans, compared to $2.9 million, or 1.08% of average loans for the second quarter of 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the provision for loan losses was $850,000 and $3.2 million, respectively. The decrease in the provision expense is reflective of the reduced level of charge-offs experienced. Non-performing assets totaled $1.8 million at June 30, 2010, compared to $2.4 million at December 31, 2009, a decrease of $562,000 or 23.6%. The decrease in non-performing assets can be attributed primarily to two loans totaling approximately $570,000 that were liquidated during the quarter, with the proceeds from the sale of assets totaling $390,000 while the remaining $180,000 was charged off.
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, was $744,000 and $1.0 million, a decrease of $288,000, or 27.9%. Included in the second quarter of 2009 was a gain on the sale of investment securities totaling
24
$361,000. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $100,000, or 29.4%, from the prior year.
Non-interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, was $1.3 million and $1.7 million, a decrease of $339,000, or 20.2%. Included in 2009 was a gain on the sale of investment securities totaling $361,000. Gains on the sale of mortgage loans decreased $95,000 or 48.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period for June 30, 2009 as mortgage lending volume declined. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $125,000, or 19.5%, from the prior year.
The following table shows the detailed components of non-interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to June 30, 2009:
( Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | Increase(Decrease) |
Service charges on deposit accounts | $ 766 | $ 641 | $125 |
Other service charges and fees | 174 | 180 | (6) |
Gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale | 100 | 195 | (95) |
Gain on the sale of investment securities | 0 | 361 | (361) |
Lease income | 67 | 81 | (14) |
BOLI income | 147 | 150 | (3) |
Other income | 80 | 65 | 15 |
$1,334 | $1,673 | $ (339) |
Non-Interest Expense
Non-interest expense was $2.6 million in the second quarter of 2010, a decrease of $631,000, or 19.4%, from $3.3 million in the same quarter of 2009. Salaries and benefit expenses decreased $339,000, primarily as a result of management’s reorganizing administrative services and the closing of two branches as announced in the third quarter of 2009. We are evaluating various strategies for the Franklin North building and are continuing to use to Glasgow branch for internal purposes. As a result, the number of full time equivalent employees declined from 106 to 91 over the past twelve months. Data processing services decreased $11,000 from the previous year and FDIC insurance premiums decreased $136,000 from the previous year due to a special assessment of $154,000 recorded in the second quarter of 2 009.
Non-interest expense was $5.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $950,000, or 15.5%, from $6.1 million in the same period of 2009. Salaries and benefit expenses decreased $566,000, primarily as a result of management’s reorganizing administrative services and the closing of two branches as announced in the third quarter of 2009. As a result, the number of full time equivalent employees declined from 106 to 91 over the past twelve months. Data processing services increased $61,000 over the previous year, while every other category of operating expenses decreased from the previous year.
The increases (decreases) in expense by major categories are as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to June 30, 2009:
25
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | Increase (Decrease) |
Salaries and employee benefits | 2,222 | 2,788 | $(566) |
Net occupancy expense | 634 | 674 | (40) |
Equipment expense | 325 | 377 | (52) |
Advertising and public relations | 133 | 227 | (94) |
Professional fees | 292 | 328 | (36) |
Data processing services | 383 | 322 | 61 |
Franchise shares and deposit tax | 234 | 249 | (15) |
FDIC Insurance | 248 | 361 | (113) |
Core deposit intangible amortization | 132 | 138 | (6) |
Postage and office supplies | 76 | 115 | (39) |
Telephone and other communications | 94 | 100 | (6) |
Other real estate expenses | 94 | 106 | (12) |
Other operating expenses | 302 | 334 | (32) |
$5,169 | $6,119 | $(950) |
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was calculated using our expected effective rate for 2010 and 2009. We have recognized deferred tax liabilities and assets to show the tax effects of differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Our statutory federal tax rate was 34.0% in both 2010 and 2009. The effective tax rate for 2010 was 17.5%, compared to (46.1%) for 2009. The difference between the statutory and effective rates are impacted by such factors as income from tax-exempt loans, tax-exempt income on state and municipal securities, and income on bank owned life insurance.
We evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis as warranted. In performing our analysis, we consider all information currently available, both positive and negative, in determining whether the deferred tax asset will be realized. We establish a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that a recorded tax benefit is not expected to be realized. At this time, we have determined that a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets is not considered necessary. We have determined that future taxable income will be available to absorb existing deferred tax assets, so all tax benefits from operating losses in 2009 have been recognized.
We do not have any beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits. We do not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase or decrease in the next twelve months. There were no interest and penalties recorded in the income statement or accrued for the quarter ending June 30, 2010 related to unrecognized tax benefits.
The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return and a Kentucky and Tennessee income tax return. These returns are subject to examination by taxing authorities for all years after 2005.
26
Balance Sheet Review
Overview
Total assets at June 30, 2010 were $346.9 million, up $2.7 million, or 0.8%, from $344.2 million at December 31, 2009. Loans increased $1.5 million, or 0.6%, from $263.9 million at December 31, 2009 to $265.4 million at June 30, 2010. Deposits at June 30, 2010 were $292.6 million, an increase of $4.1 million, or 1.4%, compared to $288.5 million at December 31, 2009.
Loans
At June 30, 2010, gross loans totaled $265.4 million, compared to $263.9 million at December 31, 2009, an increase of $1.5 million, or 0.6%. Total net loans averaged $262.9 million for the first six months of 2010, compared to $261.6 million at December 31, 2009, an increase of $1.3 million, or 0.50%. We experienced an increase in commercial real estate loans during the first six months of the year compared to year-end. The following table presents a summary of the loan portfolio by category:
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
% of Total Loans | % of Total Loans | |||||
Commercial and agricultural | $ 74,861 | 28.21% | $ 74,944 | 28.40% | ||
Commercial real estate | 106,887 | 40.28% | 104,768 | 39.70% | ||
Residential real estate | 72,679 | 27.38% | 73,166 | 27.72% | ||
Consumer | 10,960 | 4.13% | 11,044 | 4.18% | ||
$ 265,387 | 100.00% | $ 263,922 | 100.00% |
Substantially all of our loans are to customers located in Warren, Simpson, Hart and Barren counties in Kentucky. As of June 30, 2010, our twenty largest credit relationships consisted of loans and loan commitments ranging from $2.7 million to $5.2 million. The aggregate amount of these credit relationships was $71.8 million.
Our lending activities are subject to a variety of lending limits imposed by state and federal law. Citizens First Bank’s secured legal lending limit to a single borrower was approximately $10.9 million at June 30, 2010.
As of June 30, 2010, we had $10.5 million of participations in loans purchased from, and $19.9 million of participations in loans sold to, other banks.
27
The following table sets forth the maturity distribution of the loan portfolio as of June 30, 2010. Maturities are based on contractual terms. Our policy is to specifically review and approve all loans renewed; loans are not automatically rolled over.
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||
Loan Maturities as of June 30, 2010 | Within One Year | After One but Within Five Years | After Five Years | Total | ||||
Commercial and agricultural | $35,012 | $28,666 | $11,183 | $74,861 | ||||
Commercial real estate | 25,383 | 41,663 | 39,841 | 106,887 | ||||
Residential real estate | 5,409 | 18,867 | 48,403 | 72,679 | ||||
Consumer | 2,982 | 7,473 | 505 | 10,960 | ||||
Total | $68,786 | $96,669 | $99,932 | $265,387 |
Asset Quality and the Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents management's estimate of probable credit losses incurred in the loan portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change.
The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. At June 30, 2010, the allowance was $4.5 million, compared to $4.0 million at December 31, 2009.
The following table sets forth selected asset quality ratios for the periods indicated:
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||
Non-performing loans | $ 450 | $ 1,230 | ||
Non-performing assets | 1,822 | 2,384 | ||
Allowance for loan losses | 4,458 | 3,988 | ||
Non-performing assets to total assets | 0.53% | 0.69% | ||
Net charge-offs to average total loans | 0.14% | 1.72% | ||
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans | 990.67% | 324.23% | ||
Allowance for loan losses to total loans | 1.68% | 1.51% |
Non-performing loans are defined as non-accrual loans, loans accruing but past due 90 days or more, and restructured loans. Non-performing assets are defined as non-performing loans, other real estate owned, and repossessed assets. The non-performing loans at June 30, 2010 consisted of $450,000 of non-accrual loans and no accruing loans past due 90 days or more. Of the non-accrual loans, $175,000 are loans secured by real estate in the process of collection, $188,000 are loans secured by real estate not in foreclosure, $78,000 are commercial loans, and $9,000 are consumer
28
loans in the process of collection. Other non-performing assets include $1.4 million in other real estate and $7 thousand in repossessed assets.
The non-performing loan total at December 31, 2009 consisted of 22 non-accrual loans totaling $1.2 million, and 7 loans over 90 days past due totaling $48,000. Loans over 90 days past due which are still accruing either have adequate collateral or a definite repayment plan in place. Non-performing assets also included other real estate owned of six commercial properties totaling $1.1 million and one small residential property totaling $45,000.
Loans are placed on a non-accrual basis when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more and the loan is not adequately collateralized and is in the process of collection, or when, in the opinion of management, principal or interest is not likely to be paid in accordance with the terms of the obligation. Non-accrual loans are not reclassified as accruing until principal and interest payments are brought current and future payments appear reasonably certain. Loans are categorized as restructured if the original interest rate, repayment terms, or both were restructured due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. However, restructured loans that demonstrate performance under the restructured terms and that yield a market rate of interest may be removed from restructured status in the year following the restructure. Consumer loans are charged off after 120 days of delinquency unless adequately secured and in the process of collection.
Loans that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review. Where appropriate, allocations for individual loans are included in the allowance calculation based on management’s estimate of the borrower’s ability to repay the loan given the availability of collateral, other sources of cash flow and legal options available to us. Included in the review of individual loans are those that are impaired as provided in ASC Topic 310 “Receivables”. We evaluate the collectability of both principal and interest when assessing the need for a loss accrual. Historical loss rates are applied to other loans not subject to individual allocations. These historical loss rates may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, reflect the im pact of any current conditions on loss recognition. Factors which management considers in the analysis include the effects of the national and local economies, trends in the nature and volume of loans (delinquencies, charge-offs and nonaccrual loans), changes in mix, asset quality trends, risk management and loan administration, changes in internal lending policies and credit standards, and examination results from bank regulatory agencies and our internal credit examiners.
We maintain a modest unallocated amount in the allowance to recognize the imprecision in estimating and measuring losses when evaluating allocations for individual loans or pools of loans. Allocations on individual loans and historical loss rates are reviewed quarterly and adjusted as necessary based on changing borrower and/or collateral conditions and actual collection and charge-off experience.
The following table sets forth an analysis of our allowance for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
29
Summary of Loan Loss Experience
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | |
(Dollars In thousands) | ||
Balance, beginning of year | $3,988 | $3,816 |
Provision for loan losses | 850 | 3,200 |
Amounts charged off: | ||
Commercial | (119) | (2,602) |
Commercial real estate | (167) | (516) |
Residential real estate | (190) | (151) |
Consumer | (46) | (165) |
Total loans charged off: | (522) | (3,434) |
Recoveries of amounts previously charged off: | ||
Commercial | 125 | 59 |
Commercial real estate | 6 | - |
Residential real estate | 8 | 14 |
Consumer | 3 | 2 |
Total recoveries | 142 | 75 |
Net (charge-offs) recoveries | (380) | (3,359) |
Balance, end of period | $4,458 | $3,657 |
The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan category at the dates indicated. This allocation is not intended to suggest how actual losses may occur.
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
Amount | % of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Amount | % of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | |||
Residential real estate loans | $ 798 | 27.38% | $ 805 | 27.72% | ||
Consumer and other loans | 145 | 4.13% | 148 | 4.18% | ||
Commercial and agricultural | 2,567 | 28.21% | 2,085 | 28.40% | ||
Commercial real estate | 831 | 40.28% | 892 | 39.70% | ||
Unallocated | 117 | 0.00% | 58 | 0.00% | ||
Total allowance for loan losses | $ 4,458 | 100.00% | $ 3,988 | 100.00% |
We believe that the allowance for loan losses of $4.5 million at June 30, 2010 is adequate to absorb probable incurred credit losses in the loan portfolio as of that date. That determination is based on the best information available to management, but necessarily involves uncertainties and matters of judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision and could be susceptible to significant change in the future. In addition, bank regulatory authorities, as a part of their periodic examinations, may reach different conclusions about the quality of our loan portfolio and the level of the allowance, which could require us to make additional provisions in the future. We have an unallocated amount within our allowance for loan losses that fluctuates from period to period due to the trends in the lo an portfolio. The change in this amount from year end is consistent with the overall weaker economic conditions and increase in the level of net charge-offs.
30
Securities
The investment securities portfolio is comprised primarily of U.S. Government agency securities, agency mortgage-backed securities, tax-exempt securities of states and political subdivisions, and a trust preferred security. The purchase of nontaxable obligations of states and political subdivisions is a part of managing our effective tax rate. Securities are all classified as available-for-sale, and averaged $39.4 million for the first six months of 2010, compared to $42.6 million for 2009. The table below presents the carrying value of securities by major category.
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies | $19,844 | $19,102 | ||
Agency mortgage-backed securities: residential | 1,807 | 2,061 | ||
Municipal securities | 19,231 | 19,196 | ||
Other securities | 900 | 700 | ||
Total available-for-sale securities | $41,782 | $41,059 |
The table below presents the maturities and yield characteristics of securities as of June 30, 2010. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
June 30, 2010 | (Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||
One Year or Less | Over One Year Through Five Years | Over Five Years Through Ten Years | Over Ten Years | Total Maturities | Fair Value | ||
U.S. Government agencies | $ - | $ 5,997 | $12,725 | $ 1,021 | $ 19,743 | $19,844 | |
Agency mortgage-backed securities: (1) | 32 | 1,693 | - | - | 1,725 | 1,807 | |
Municipal securities | 381 | 2,539 | 7,700 | 8,076 | 18,696 | 19,231 | |
Other Securities | - | - | - | 1,862 | 1,862 | 900 | |
Total available-for-sale securities | $ 413 | $ 10,229 | $20,425 | $ 10,959 | $ 42,026 | $ 41,782 | |
Percent of total | 1.0% | 24.3% | 48.6% | 26.1% | 100.0% | ||
Weighted average yield(2) | 5.62% | 3.05% | 3.52% | 5.59% | 3.98% |
_______________
(1) | Agency mortgage-backed securities (residential) are grouped into average lives based on June 2010 prepayment projections. |
(2) | The weighted average yields are based on amortized cost and municipal securities are calculated on a full tax-equivalent basis. |
Other securities consist of one single issue trust preferred security which has experienced a decline in fair value due to inactivity in the market. No impairment charge is being taken as no loss of principal is anticipated and all principal and interest
31
payments are being received as scheduled. All rated securities are investment grade. For those that are not rated, the financial condition has been evaluated and no adverse conditions were identified related to repayment. Declines in fair value are a function of rate changes in the market and market illiquidity. We do not intend to sell these securities and do not believe we will be required to sell these securities
Deposits
Our primary source of funding for lending and investment activities results from customer and brokered deposits. As of June 30, 2010, total deposits were $292.6 million, compared to total deposits of $288.5 million at December 31, 2009, an increase of $4.1 million or 1.4%. Total deposits averaged $293.7 million during the first six months of 2010, an increase of $22.0 million, or 8.1%, compared to $271.7 million in the first six months of 2009.
We utilize brokered certificates of deposit and will continue to utilize these sources for deposits when they can be cost-effective. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, these brokered deposits totaled $16.1 and $21.4 million, respectively. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, these brokered deposits constituted approximately 5.5% and 7.4% of our total deposits, respectively.
Time deposits of $100,000 or more totaled $78.9 and $78.7 million, at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively. Interest expense on time deposits of $100,000 or more was $1.0 million for the first six months of 2010, compared to $1.3 million for the first six months of 2009. Our cost has decreased as these certificates of deposit matured and were renewed at lower current market rates. The following table shows the maturities of time deposits greater than $100,000 as of June 30, 2010.
(Dollars in Thousands) | |
June 30, 2010 | |
Three months or less | $ 18,438 |
Over three through six months | 19,892 |
Over six through twelve months | 19,334 |
Over one year through three years | 20,019 |
Over three years through five years | 1,225 |
Over five years | - |
Total | $ 78,908 |
Borrowings
FHLB Advances. We obtain advances from the Federal Home Bank of Cincinnati (FHLB) for funding and liability management. These advances are collateralized by a blanket agreement of eligible 1-4 family residential mortgage loans and eligible commercial real estate. Rates vary based on the term to repayment, and are summarized below as of June 30, 2010:
32
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||
Type | Maturity | Rate | Amount | |||
Fixed | August 22, 2012 | 1.09% | 2,000 | |||
Fixed | August 28, 2012 | 4.25% | 500 | |||
Fixed | December 24, 2012 | 3.36% | 2,000 | |||
Fixed | December 24, 2014 | 3.46% | 2,000 | |||
Fixed | February 25, 2015 | 2.85% | 2,000 | |||
$8,500 |
At June 30, 2010, we had available collateral to borrow an additional $19.3 million from the FHLB.
Other Borrowings. At June 30, 2010, we had established Federal Funds lines of credit totaling $20.9 million with four correspondent banks. No amounts were drawn as of June 30, 2010.
Repurchase agreements mature in one business day. The rate paid on these accounts is variable at the Bank’s discretion and is based on a tiered balance calculation. Information regarding federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements as of June 30, 2010, is presented below.
(Dollars in thousands) | |
June 30, 2010 | |
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements: | |
Balance at period end | $810 |
Weighted average rate at period end | 0.94% |
Average balance during the six months ended June 30, 2010 | $936 |
Weighted average rate for the six months ending June 30, 2010 | 0.94% |
Maximum month-end balance | $918 |
We issued $5.0 million in subordinated debentures in October, 2006 in conjunction with the acquisition of Kentucky Banking Centers. These trust preferred securities bear an interest rate, which reprices each calendar quarter, of 165 basis points over 3-month LIBOR (London Inter Bank Offering Rate). The rate as of June 30, 2010 was 1.94%. The subordinated debentures may be included with tier 1 capital (with certain limitations) under current regulatory guidelines.
Liquidity
Our objective for liquidity management is to ensure that we have funds available to meet deposit withdrawals and credit demands without unduly penalizing profitability. In order to maintain a proper level of liquidity, the Bank has several sources of funds available on a daily basis that can be used for liquidity purposes. Those sources of funds include the Bank’s core deposits, cash flow generated by repayment of principal
33
and interest on loans and investment securities; FHLB borrowings; and federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and investment securities are generally a predictable source of funds, deposit outflows and mortgage prepayments are influenced significantly by general interest rates, economic conditions, and competition in our local markets.
Our asset and liability management committee meets monthly and monitors the composition of the balance sheet to ensure comprehensive management of interest rate risk and liquidity. We prepare a monthly cash flow report which forecasts funding needs and availability for the coming months, based on forecasts of loan closings and payoffs, potentially callable securities, and other factors.
Capital
Stockholders’ equity was $37.9 million on June 30, 2010, an increase of $1.0 million or 2.7%, from $36.9 million on December 31, 2009. Retained earnings increased due to the increase in our net income reduced by the payment of preferred dividends. No common dividends have been paid during 2010.
We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken could have a material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under the regulatory accounting practices. Our capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Under quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy, we are required to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and to total assets. We believe we met all capital adequacy requirements as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
34
Our capital ratios (calculated in accordance with regulatory guidelines) were as follows: | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||
Tier 1 leverage ratio | 10.69% | 10.52% | ||
Regulatory minimum | 4.00% | 4.00% | ||
“Well-capitalized” minimum | N/A | N/A | ||
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio | 12.84% | 12.54% | ||
Regulatory minimum | 4.00% | 4.00% | ||
“Well-capitalized” minimum | N/A | N/A | ||
Total risk-based capital ratio | 14.09% | 13.79% | ||
Regulatory minimum | 8.00% | 8.00% | ||
“Well-capitalized” minimum | N/A | N/A |
The Bank’s capital ratios (calculated in accordance with regulatory guidelines) were as follows:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||
Tier 1 leverage ratio | 9.54% | 9.38% | ||
Regulatory minimum | 4.00% | 4.00% | ||
“Well-capitalized” minimum | 5.00% | 5.00% | ||
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio | 11.44% | 11.12% | ||
Regulatory minimum | 4.00% | 4.00% | ||
“Well-capitalized” minimum | 6.00% | 6.00% | ||
Total risk-based capital ratio | 12.69% | 12.37% | ||
Regulatory minimum | 8.00% | 8.00% | ||
“Well-capitalized” minimum | 10.00% | 10.00% |
During the third quarter of 2004, we completed the private placement of 250 shares of Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock at a stated value of $31,992 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $7,998,000. The preferred stock is entitled to quarterly cumulative dividends at an annual fixed rate of 6.5% and is convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion price per share of $14.06.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, 250 shares of Series A preferred stock, at a stated value of $35,116 per share, were issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with the TARP Capital Purchase Program for a purchase price of $8,779,000. The Series A preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes and ranks senior to common stock and pari passu with our cumulative convertible preferred stock. This cumulative preferred stock pays a 5% annual dividend, increasing to 9% after 5 years from the date of issuance.
35
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We use a simulation model as a tool to monitor and evaluate interest rate risk exposure. The model is designed to measure the sensitivity of net interest income and net income to changing interest rates over future time periods. Forecasting net interest income and its sensitivity to changes in interest rates requires us to make assumptions about the volume and characteristics of many attributes, including assumptions relating to the replacement of maturing earning assets and liabilities. Other assumptions include, but are not limited to, projected prepayments, projected new volume, and the predicted relationship between changes in market interest rates and changes in customer account balances. These effects are combined with our estimate of the most likely rate environment to produce a foreca st of net interest income and net income. The forecasted results are then adjusted for the effect of a gradual increase and decrease in market interest rates on our net interest income and net income. Because assumptions are inherently uncertain, the model cannot precisely estimate net interest income or net income or the effect of interest rate changes on net interest income and net income. Actual results could differ significantly from simulated results.
At June 30, 2010, the model indicated that if rates were to increase by 200 basis points during the remainder of the calendar year, then net interest income would increase .05% over the next twelve months. The model indicated that if rates were to decrease by 200 basis points over the same period, then net interest income would increase .60%. Net interest income would increase at a slower pace in the rising rate environment due to the increased cost of liabilities that would reprice during this time period compared to the assets which would not reprice in the same timeframe. The table below notes the projected changes in net interest income as indicated by the model for increases in rates up to 400 basis points and decreases in rates to 300 basis points.
Projections for: Jul 2010 - Jun 2011 | |||
Projected Interest Rate Change | Estimated Value | Net Interest Income $ Change From Base | % Change From Base |
+400 | 13,754,266 | 904,978 | 7.04% |
+300 | 13,291,620 | 442,332 | 3.44% |
+200 | 12,855,747 | 6,458 | 0.05% |
Base | 12,849,289 | 0 | 0.00% |
-200 | 12,926,209 | 76,920 | 0.60% |
-300 | 12,695,776 | -153,513 | -1.19% |
36
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this report, these disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is: (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and (b) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Additionally, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting.
37
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits
EXHIBIT INDEX
3.1 | Restated Articles of Incorporation of Citizens First Corporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-103238)). |
3.2 | Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Citizens First Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3. 3 of the Registrant’s Form 10-QSB dated June 30, 2004). |
3.3 | Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Citizens First Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3. 1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed June 5, 2007). |
3.4 | Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Citizens First Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3. 1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed December 23, 2008). |
3.5 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Citizens First Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed April 27, 2009). |
4.1 | Restated Articles of Incorporation of Citizens First Corporation, as amended (see Exhibit 3.1). |
4.2 | Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Citizens First Corporation (see Exhibits 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4). |
4.3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Citizens First Corporation (see Exhibit 3.5). |
4.4 Copy of Registrants’ Agreement Pursuant to Item 601(b) (4) (iii) (A) of Regulation S-K dated March 30, 2007 with respect to certain debt instruments (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant’s Form 10K-SB dated June 30, 2007). |
4.5 | Warrant to Purchase Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 23, 2008). |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350.
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350. |
38
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CITIZENS FIRST CORPORATION | ||
Date: | July 30, 2010 | /s/ M. Todd Kanipe |
M. Todd Kanipe | ||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
July 30, 2010 | /s/ J. Steven Marcum | |
J. Steven Marcum | ||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||
39