UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT
OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-834
Name of Registrant: Vanguard Windsor Funds
Address of Registrant:
P.O. Box 2600
Valley Forge, PA 19482
Name and address of agent for service:
Heidi Stam, Esquire
P.O. Box 876
Valley Forge, PA 19482
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (610) 669-1000
Date of fiscal year end: October 31
Date of reporting period: November 1, 2010 – April 30, 2011
Item 1: Reports to Shareholders
Vanguard Windsor™ Fund | |
Semiannual Report | |
April 30, 2011 | |
> Vanguard Windsor Fund returned more than 17% for the six months ended April 30, 2011, slightly ahead of its benchmark but a bit behind the average return of peer funds.
> The broad stock market recorded strong returns as corporate profits continued to rise.
> Energy and financial stocks were major contributors to the fund’s performance.
Contents | |
Your Fund’s Total Returns. | 1 |
Chairman’s Letter. | 2 |
Advisors’ Report. | 6 |
Fund Profile. | 10 |
Performance Summary. | 11 |
Financial Statements. | 12 |
About Your Fund’s Expenses. | 26 |
Trustees Approve Advisory Agreements. | 28 |
Glossary. | 30 |
Please note: The opinions expressed in this report are just that—informed opinions. They should not be considered promises or advice.
Also, please keep in mind that the information and opinions cover the period through the date on the front of this report. Of course, the risks of investing in your fund are spelled out in the prospectus.
See the Glossary for definitions of investment terms used in this report.
Cover photograph: Jean Maher.
Your Fund’s Total Returns
Six Months Ended April 30, 2011 | |
Total | |
Returns | |
Vanguard Windsor Fund | |
Investor Shares | 17.56% |
Admiral™ Shares | 17.65 |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.29 |
Multi-Cap Value Funds Average | 17.79 |
Multi-Cap Value Funds Average: Derived from data provided by Lipper Inc.
Admiral Shares carry lower expenses and are available to investors who meet certain account-balance requirements.
Your Fund’s Performance at a Glance | ||||
October 31, 2010 , Through April 30, 2011 | ||||
Distributions Per Share | ||||
Starting | Ending | Income | Capital | |
Share Price | Share Price | Dividends | Gains | |
Vanguard Windsor Fund | ||||
Investor Shares | $12.56 | $14.68 | $0.078 | $0.000 |
Admiral Shares | 42.37 | 49.54 | 0.281 | 0.000 |
1
Chairman’s Letter
Dear Shareholder,
The stock market was notably productive and robust during the six months ended April 30, 2011, and Vanguard Windsor Fund benefited from both the favorable investment environment and the talents of its advisors. Windsor’s return of more than 17% for the period was a bit better than that of its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index, but it slightly trailed the average return for multi-capitalization value funds.
The fund saw positive returns in all ten sectors––all but one of them (utilities) double-digits. Energy stocks led the way. The advisors’ stock selections in financials, the fund’s largest sector concentration, were especially distinguished.
Strong returns around the globe
The headlines were dominated by political upheaval, natural and nuclear disaster, and economic distress, but global stock markets produced outstanding returns for the six months ended April 30. The broad U.S. stock market returned more than 17%. Although rising food and gasoline prices put pressure on consumer budgets, corporate earnings growth remained strong and the pace of new job creation bounced back from extremely depressed levels.
Outside the United States, global stock markets produced a smaller but still robust six-month return of more than 12%. For U.S.-based investors, almost half of this
2
increase reflected exchange-rate gains produced largely by strength in the euro and in emerging economies.
As the economy found its footing, rates edged higher
Rising longer-term interest rates put pressure on bond prices, which led to modest bond market returns for the six-month period. The broad taxable U.S. bond market returned about 0%. The broad municipal market returned –1.68%. The rise in rates reflected both confidence that the economic recovery would prove self-sustaining and thus nudge rates higher, and anxiety that higher rates would be necessary to provide some protection from inflation. Even so, inflation expectations remained subdued, as measured by the difference between the yields of inflation-protected and nominal U.S. Treasury bonds.
The return on short-term money market instruments such as the 3-month U.S. Treasury bill remained near 0%, consistent with the Federal Reserve Board’s target for short-term rates.
Energy, financial sectors led broad-based gains
Vanguard Windsor Fund takes a contrarian approach to investment management. When many portfolio managers are selling companies that have fallen out of favor, Windsor’s advisors are sorting through castoffs for bargains. The key to Windsor’s selection process is finding relatively
Market Barometer | |||
Total Returns | |||
Periods Ended April 30, 2011 | |||
Six | One | Five Years | |
Months | Year | (Annualized) | |
Stocks | |||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-caps) | 17.12% | 18.02% | 3.30% |
Russell 2000 Index (Small-caps) | 23.73 | 22.20 | 3.89 |
Dow Jones U.S. Total Stock Market Index | 17.28 | 18.40 | 3.65 |
MSCI All Country World Index ex USA (International) | 12.44 | 19.73 | 3.55 |
Bonds | |||
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (Broad | |||
taxable market) | 0.02% | 5.36% | 6.33% |
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index (Broad | |||
tax-exempt market) | -1.68 | 2.20 | 4.52 |
Citigroup Three-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index | 0.06 | 0.15 | 2.02 |
CPI | |||
Consumer Price Index | 2.83% | 3.16% | 2.22% |
3
inexpensive companies with solid fundamentals and strong potential for long-term growth—in other words, companies that have below-average valuations and average or better prospects. The fund’s stock and sector allocations often look very different from those of its benchmark index; thus, at the end of any given period, it’s not uncommon for fund and benchmark returns to differ markedly. Over time, of course, we expect these differences to work to the advantage of the fund’s shareholders.
Energy was the best-performing sector over the period as oil prices climbed in response to unrest in the Middle East and North Africa. The major oil producers turned in strong gains, but other companies in the sector also received a lift from rising energy prices. Windsor’s energy stocks returned 35%. It may seem silly to find fault with a six-month return of 35%, but it’s worth noting that in this sector the fund did slightly trail its benchmark index. The fund was underweighted in some of the top performers––including Chevron and Occidental Petroleum. To some extent, these shortfalls were offset by Windsor’s commitment to Statoil ASA (not included in the benchmark index), Weatherford, and natural gas and coal producer Consol Energy.
The economic recovery and strong corporate earnings helped consumer discretionary stocks, the fund’s second-best sector. Two of Windsor’s media
Expense Ratios | |||
Your Fund Compared With Its Peer Group | |||
Investor | Admiral | Peer Group | |
Shares | Shares | Average | |
Windsor Fund | 0.33% | 0.22% | 1.28% |
The fund expense ratios shown are from the prospectus dated February 24, 2011, and represent estimated costs for the current fiscal year. For the six months ended April 30, 2011, the fund’s annualized expense ratios were 0.38% for Investor Shares and 0.28% for Admiral Shares. This increase from the estimated expense ratio reflects a performance-based investment advisory fee adjustment. When the performance adjustment is positive, the fund’s expenses increase; when it is negative, expenses decrease. The peer-group expense ratio is derived from data provided by Lipper Inc. and captures information through year-end 2010.
Peer group: Multi-Cap Value Funds.
4
holdings––Comcast and CBS––rose as the price of advertisements on cable and broadcast television increased.
Windsor’s top individual contributor for the period was Arrow Electronics, which returned nearly 54%. However, this success was muted by the poor performance of some of the fund’s other technology holdings––particularly Cisco Systems. Hurt by rising oil prices, industrials holding Delta Air Lines was Windsor’s weakest individual performer.
Compared with the benchmark index, the advisors’ stock selection was most distinguished in the financial sector, where the rising economic tide lifted some boats while setting others adrift. Investment banking giant Goldman Sachs––which posted a negative return––and financial conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway didn’t keep up with others in the sector. Windsor benefited from its light exposure to these big names and from its heavier allocation to firms such as TD Ameritrade, Ameriprise Financial, BlackRock, and Principal Financial Group.
You can find more information about Windsor’s performance and positioning in the Advisors’ Report, which follows this letter.
Look to the long term when building a portfolio
Since the bottom reached by the market in March 2009, Vanguard Windsor Fund, along with the broader stock market, has made an impressive comeback. In April, stocks enjoyed their best month so far this calendar year, with investors focusing on rising corporate profits rather than March’s tragedy in Japan, turmoil in the Middle East, high oil prices, and inflation worries.
The extremes seen in the past few years vividly illustrate the ups and downs that make up the market’s long-term perfor-mance. Nobody can forecast the market’s next movement. While you can’t control the markets, you can control how you react to them and the type of portfolio you construct. This means concentrating on the long term by building a diversified, well-balanced portfolio that is aligned with your goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance.
Patience is one of the foundations upon which Windsor Fund was created more than five decades ago. Its advisors have exercised discipline by focusing on long-term strategy rather than fixating on short-term fluctuations. With its distinctive value approach, seasoned fund managers, and low expenses, Windsor can play an important supporting role in your balanced portfolio.
Thank you for your confidence in Vanguard.
Sincerely,
F. William McNabb III
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2011
5
Advisors’ Report
For the fiscal half-year ended April 30, 2011, the Investor Shares of Vanguard Windsor Fund returned 17.56%, while the lower-cost Admiral Shares returned 17.65%. Your fund is managed by two independent advisors, a strategy that enhances the fund’s diversification by providing exposure to distinct, yet complementary, investment approaches. It is not uncommon for different advisors to have different views about individual securities or the broader investment environment.
The advisors, the percentage and amount of fund assets that each manages, and brief descriptions of their investment strategies are presented in the table below. The advisors have also prepared a discussion of the investment environ-ment that existed during the period and of how the portfolio positioning reflects this assessment. These reports were prepared on May 17, 2011.
Vanguard Windsor Fund Investment Advisors | |||
Fund Assets Managed | |||
Investment Advisor | % | $ Million | Investment Strategy |
Wellington Management | 69 | 9,763 | Seeks to provide long-term total returns above both the |
Company, LLP | S&P 500 and value-oriented indexes over a complete | ||
market cycle through bottom-up, fundamentally driven | |||
stock selection focused on deeply undervalued | |||
securities. | |||
AllianceBernstein L.P. | 29 | 4,204 | A value focus that couples rigorous fundamental |
company research with quantitative risk controls to | |||
capture value opportunities. | |||
Cash Investments | 2 | 312 | These short-term reserves are invested by Vanguard in |
equity index products to simulate investment in stocks. | |||
Each advisor also may maintain a modest cash | |||
position. |
6
Wellington Management Company, LLP
Portfolio Manager:
James N. Mordy, Senior Vice President and Equity Portfolio Manager
Performance has been satisfactory over the past six months as the broad market continued a robust advance fueled by solid corporate earnings growth, decent economic progress, and continued monetary and fiscal stimulus from the U.S. government. With most investors embracing risk, we have had a heightened sensitivity to potential challenges, including surging commodity costs, geopolitical tension, tighter monetary policy in many countries, and the impending conclusion of the Federal Reserve’s second round of quantitative easing (QE2). At the margin, we slightly reduced our exposure to the more cyclical sectors of the market.
We currently have 74% of our portfolio assets invested in these sectors (energy, materials, consumer discretionary, information technology, financials, and industrials), which together account for about 72% of the S&P 500. This spread is four percentage points lower than it was six months ago.
During the period, we had favorable relative results in seven out of the ten industry sectors. Our strongest out-performance came in the information technology sector, which also happened to be our worst-performing sector during the 12 months ended October 31, 2010. The portfolio’s underweighted position in this sector contributed to performance, as did stock selection. Semiconductor distributor Arrow Electronics, our second-largest holding over the period, rose 53%. A much-feared correction in the stock never really materialized as management enhanced earnings power through several acquisitions. The stock remains attractively valued, with significant further upside in our view.
Consumer staples was our next-best sector. We had no exposure to household products companies, whose limited growth prospects and cost inflation challenges make stock valuations problematic. Stock selection in the financial, consumer discretionary, and health care sectors helped the portfolio outperform the index, while selection in industrials led to underperformance in that sector. Delta Air Lines declined more than 25% as the combination of higher oil prices, unrest in the Middle East, and natural disasters in Japan made for a much more challenging environment than anticipated. We sold a significant portion of our holding during the period at prices above current levels. Energy was the strongest sector in the market, and while our stocks kept pace, a slightly underweighted position detracted from relative results.
During the period, in order of significance, we were net buyers in the health care, financial, and telecommunication services sectors. We were net sellers in the industrial, consumer discretionary, consumer staples, and information technology sectors. Among our largest purchases were Statoil ASA (concerns around European gas contract pricing and global oversupply of liquid natural gas seem exaggerated to us); ASML
7
Holding (the company’s strong hold on the lithography segment of the semiconductor equipment industry is underappreciated); and Weyerhaeuser (log and lumber industry conditions should gradually improve as housing recovers and exports to China and Japan increase). Our largest sales were CBS and QUALCOMM, both of which were eliminated from the portfolio at a significant profit.
The most important changes to highlight in sector positioning include a greater underweighting in industrials, a diminished overweighting in consumer discretionary, and increased overweightings in both health care and financials. Our largest overweighted positions compared with the S&P 500 Index are in financials, health care, and materials. Our largest underweighted positions are in consumer staples, industrials, and information technology.
Market psychology seems to be caught in a tug-of-war between positive cyclical forces on one side and potentially negative secular issues on the other. The economy is trying to transition off of government life support to a more sustainable mix of private sector growth. Corporate profit growth continues to impress, and better job growth numbers in recent months have been encouraging. Risks to the pace of recovery are building as QE2 will soon end, U.S. fiscal stimulus will likely be reduced next year and beyond, foreign governments are tightening monetary policy and risking slower growth to combat inflationary pressures, and the United States must ultimately address its debt problem. A very recent correction in several key commodity prices, if sustained, would help alleviate some inflationary pressure in the short-term. Conscious of these challenges, we’ve taken profits in some of the cyclical sectors where we felt good news had been priced in, resulting in a more neutral positioning in these sectors.
We will remain true to our time-tested value investing principles. Based on consensus analyst expectations, our stocks continue to sell at a discount to the price/earnings ratios of both the S&P 500 Index and the Russell 1000 Value Index, and have superior earnings growth prospects over the next five years. It is classic Windsor math to own companies at discounted valuations that have the potential to produce superior returns over the long run.
AllianceBernstein L.P.
Portfolio Managers:
Joseph G. Paul, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Large-Cap Value Equities and North American Value Equities
Gregory L. Powell, Director of Research, U.S. Large-Cap Value Equities
Stocks rose over the past six months amid growing confidence in the sustainability of the U.S. economic recovery and diminished systemic risks. While the weak job market, fragile housing recovery, and rising energy prices have created uncertainties that we are monitoring closely, we continue to see significant opportunities in U.S. equities.
8
With corporate earnings still expanding, stocks remain attractively valued versus their long-term history and fixed-income alternatives. Improving risk appetites also bode well for active strategies. In their intense focus on near-term macroeconomic and geopolitical events, investors have ignored important fundamental differences among companies, even as those differences grow increasingly divergent. This behavior has created significant misvaluations—and ideal conditions for research-based stock-picking.
We see a particularly large opportunity in value stocks, which have borne much of the brunt of the post-crisis investor angst. By our forecasts, the most attractively valued stocks in the market continue to trade at unusually wide discounts to the most expensive stocks. History suggests that the current value recovery is still in the early stages of a multiyear upturn.
Though our portfolio retains a procyclical tilt, our positioning does not reflect a particularly provocative macroeconomic view. Rather, we expect outperformance to come largely from company-specific value opportunities that our research is uncovering across sectors.
One recent purchase, Dow Chemical, exemplifies the critical role of research in our investment process. Petrochemical stocks have been weighed down by worries that because of heavy Middle Eastern government investment in production capacity as a way to use the natural gas that is a by-product of oil production, prices would stay depressed for some time. But several trips by our analysts to the Middle East, along with our extensive research into the region’s energy and chemical industries, revealed natural gas production growth to be much slower than the consensus view, implying a similar slowdown in chemical capacity growth and much higher future chemical prices. Dow was already enjoying a large cost advantage from sourcing low-cost U.S. natural gas. In our view, however, the market had not yet factored in either these significant improvements in polyethylene pricing outlook or the company’s earnings power. For these reasons, we believe that the stock is trading at a considerable discount to the market.
The exceptional value opportunity in cash is another dominant theme in our portfolio. We have targeted our research on finding cash-rich firms that have either a strong history of returning cash to shareholders or a greater-than-average potential to increase cash payouts. We have significant positions in DIRECTV, Time Warner Cable, Gap, and Northrop Grumman. We expect these four companies to return excess cash in the form of share repurchase programs equal to 40% to 50% of their current market capitalizations through 2015, based on their announcements and our cash-flow forecasts.
9
Windsor Fund
Fund Profile
As of April 30, 2011
Share-Class Characteristics | ||
Investor | Admiral | |
Shares | Shares | |
Ticker Symbol | VWNDX | VWNEX |
Expense Ratio1 | 0.33% | 0.22% |
30-Day SEC Yield | 1.19% | 1.29% |
Portfolio Characteristics | |||
Russell | DJ | ||
1000 | U.S. Total | ||
Value | Market | ||
Fund | Index | Index | |
Number of Stocks | 167 | 664 | 3,817 |
Median Market Cap $27.7B | $38.3B | $31.8B | |
Price/Earnings Ratio | 14.6x | 16.1x | 17.7x |
Price/Book Ratio | 1.8x | 1.7x | 2.4x |
Return on Equity | 15.3% | 14.3% | 18.9% |
Earnings Growth Rate | 3.9% | 0.8% | 5.9% |
Dividend Yield | 1.6% | 2.2% | 1.7% |
Foreign Holdings | 14.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Turnover Rate | |||
(Annualized) | 51% | — | — |
Short-Term Reserves | 1.2% | — | — |
Sector Diversification (% of equity exposure) | |||
Russell | DJ | ||
1000 | U.S. Total | ||
Value | Market | ||
Fund | Index | Index | |
Consumer | |||
Discretionary | 14.6% | 8.0% | 11.8% |
Consumer Staples | 6.6 | 9.6 | 9.4 |
Energy | 13.0 | 13.6 | 11.6 |
Financials | 20.4 | 26.3 | 15.8 |
Health Care | 15.8 | 12.9 | 11.1 |
Industrials | 7.7 | 9.3 | 11.6 |
Information | |||
Technology | 12.1 | 5.4 | 18.5 |
Materials | 5.7 | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Telecommunication | |||
Services | 1.9 | 5.0 | 2.6 |
Utilities | 2.2 | 6.7 | 3.1 |
Volatility Measures | ||
Russell | DJ | |
1000 | U.S. Total | |
Value | Market | |
Index | Index | |
R-Squared | 0.96 | 0.98 |
Beta | 1.04 | 1.08 |
These measures show the degree and timing of the fund’s fluctuations compared with the indexes over 36 months.
Ten Largest Holdings (% of total net assets) | ||
Wells Fargo & Co. | Diversified Banks | 2.9% |
Comcast Corp. Class A | Cable & Satellite | 2.5 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | Diversified Financial | |
Services | 2.2 | |
Arrow Electronics Inc. | Technology | |
Distributors | 2.2 | |
Pfizer Inc. | Pharmaceuticals | 2.1 |
ACE Ltd. | Property & Casualty | |
Insurance | 1.9 | |
UnitedHealth Group Inc. | Managed Health | |
Care | 1.8 | |
Ameriprise Financial Inc. | Asset Management | |
& Custody Banks | 1.6 | |
Amgen Inc. | Biotechnology | 1.6 |
Buck Holdings LP Private | General | |
Placement | Merchandise Stores | 1.5 |
Top Ten | 20.3% |
The holdings listed exclude any temporary cash investments and equity index products.
Investment Focus
1 The expense ratios shown are from the prospectus dated February 24, 2011, and represent estimated costs for the current fiscal year. For the six months ended April 30, 2011, the annualized expense ratios were 0.38% for Investor Shares and 0.28% for Admiral Shares. This increase from the estimated expense ratio reflects a performance-based investment advisory fee adjustment. When the performance adjustment is positive, the fund’s expenses increase; when it is negative, expenses decrease.
10
Windsor Fund
Performance Summary
All of the returns in this report represent past performance, which is not a guarantee of future results that may be achieved by the fund. (Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data cited. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit our website at vanguard.com/performance.) Note, too, that both investment returns and principal value can fluctuate widely, so an investor’s shares, when sold, could be worth more or less than their original cost. The returns shown do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or on the sale of fund shares.
Fiscal-Year Total Returns (%): October 31, 2000, Through April 30, 2011
Average Annual Total Returns: Periods Ended March 31, 2011
This table presents returns through the latest calendar quarter—rather than through the end of the fiscal period.
Securities and Exchange Commission rules require that we provide this information.
Inception | One | Five | Ten | |
Date | Year | Years | Years | |
Investor Shares | 10/23/1958 | 14.46% | 1.29% | 4.18% |
Admiral Shares | 11/12/2001 | 14.56 | 1.42 | 4.791 |
1 Return since inception. |
See Financial Highlights for dividend and capital gains information.
11
Windsor Fund
Financial Statements (unaudited)
Statement of Net Assets
As of April 30, 2011
The fund reports a complete list of its holdings in regulatory filings four times in each fiscal year, at the quarter-ends. For the second and fourth fiscal quarters, the lists appear in the fund’s semiannual and annual reports to shareholders. For the first and third fiscal quarters, the fund files the lists with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form N-Q. Shareholders can look up the fund’s Forms N-Q on the SEC’s website at sec.gov. Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room (see the back cover of this report for further information).
Market | |||
Value | |||
Shares | ($000) | ||
Common Stocks (97.5%)1 | |||
Consumer Discretionary (14.2%) | |||
Comcast Corp. Class A | |||
Special Shares | 8,941,200 | 219,506 | |
*,2 | Buck Holdings LP | ||
Private Placement | NA | 212,766 | |
Virgin Media Inc. | 6,603,800 | 199,831 | |
Home Depot Inc. | 4,362,700 | 162,031 | |
Comcast Corp. Class A | 5,253,700 | 137,857 | |
Staples Inc. | 6,320,600 | 133,617 | |
* | Toll Brothers Inc. | 5,720,000 | 120,177 |
3 | MDC Holdings Inc. | 3,337,926 | 97,434 |
TJX Cos. Inc. | 1,669,200 | 89,502 | |
Time Warner Cable Inc. | 873,800 | 68,270 | |
News Corp. Class A | 3,041,200 | 54,194 | |
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 1,835,000 | 48,169 | |
Time Warner Inc. | 1,157,100 | 43,808 | |
Viacom Inc. Class B | 784,140 | 40,117 | |
Ross Stores Inc. | 504,100 | 37,147 | |
Gap Inc. | 1,507,800 | 35,041 | |
Lear Corp. | 628,000 | 32,116 | |
* | DIRECTVClass A | 653,200 | 31,739 |
Limited Brands Inc. | 640,300 | 26,355 | |
* | Ford Motor Co. | 1,612,600 | 24,947 |
Gannett Co. Inc. | 1,632,909 | 24,592 | |
Fortune Brands Inc. | 377,500 | 24,568 | |
* | NVR Inc. | 32,904 | 24,327 |
Macy’s Inc. | 1,004,400 | 24,015 | |
* | TRW Automotive | ||
Holdings Corp. | 418,300 | 23,868 | |
* | Royal Caribbean | ||
Cruises Ltd. | 441,200 | 17,569 | |
Foot Locker Inc. | 750,000 | 16,140 | |
* | OfficeDepot Inc. | 3,038,600 | 13,096 |
* | GameStop Corp. Class A | 481,400 | 12,362 |
* | General Motors Co. | 359,600 | 11,540 |
McGraw-Hill Cos. Inc. | 207,700 | 8,406 | |
*,^ | Garmin Ltd. | 210,044 | 7,190 |
2,022,297 |
Market | |||
Value | |||
Shares | ($000) | ||
Consumer Staples (6.3%) | |||
Japan Tobacco Inc. | 35,498 | 137,956 | |
Molson Coors | |||
Brewing Co. Class B | 2,771,400 | 135,106 | |
Archer-Daniels- | |||
Midland Co. | 2,823,900 | 104,541 | |
SyscoCorp. | 3,226,500 | 93,278 | |
CVS Caremark Corp. | 2,476,700 | 89,756 | |
Kroger Co. | 2,933,700 | 71,318 | |
Procter & Gamble Co. | 1,086,400 | 70,507 | |
Altria Group Inc. | 2,167,300 | 58,170 | |
Bunge Ltd. | 695,400 | 52,461 | |
* | Constellation Brands Inc. | ||
Class A | 1,720,060 | 38,512 | |
* | Smithfield Foods Inc. | 1,150,400 | 27,103 |
BRF–Brasil Foods SA | 1,035,900 | 21,005 | |
Tyson Foods Inc. Class A | 154,500 | 3,075 | |
902,788 | |||
Energy (12.5%) | |||
Apache Corp. | 1,203,400 | 160,497 | |
Statoil ASA ADR | 5,470,100 | 160,329 | |
* | Southwestern Energy Co. | 3,571,800 | 156,659 |
ChevronCorp. | 1,292,800 | 141,484 | |
Inpex Corp. | 15,748 | 121,067 | |
Consol Energy Inc. | 2,089,759 | 113,035 | |
Noble Corp. | 2,491,500 | 107,159 | |
Canadian Natural | |||
Resources Ltd. | 2,244,200 | 105,388 | |
Devon Energy Corp. | 1,105,932 | 100,640 | |
Marathon Oil Corp. | 1,643,500 | 88,815 | |
ConocoPhillips | 1,073,200 | 84,708 | |
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. | 908,000 | 71,677 | |
* | Weatherford | ||
International Ltd. | 3,047,900 | 65,774 | |
Hess Corp. | 561,655 | 48,280 | |
Nexen Inc. | 1,750,000 | 46,252 | |
Ensco plc ADR | 724,700 | 43,207 | |
* | Newfield Exploration Co. | 608,200 | 43,061 |
* | Forest Oil Corp. | 1,154,400 | 41,454 |
12
Windsor Fund
Market | |||
Value | |||
Shares | ($000) | ||
* | Nabors Industries Ltd. | 1,125,000 | 34,470 |
* | McDermott | ||
International Inc. | 952,000 | 21,982 | |
Baker Hughes Inc. | 210,300 | 16,279 | |
* | Tesoro Corp. | 520,600 | 14,119 |
1,786,336 | |||
Exchange-Traded Funds (1.1%) | |||
4 | Vanguard Value ETF | 1,689,100 | 98,644 |
4 | Vanguard Total Stock | ||
Market ETF | 892,000 | 63,064 | |
161,708 | |||
Financials (19.8%) | |||
Wells Fargo & Co. | 14,105,800 | 410,620 | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 6,859,250 | 312,988 | |
ACE Ltd. | 3,936,800 | 264,750 | |
Ameriprise Financial Inc. | 3,705,400 | 229,957 | |
Unum Group | 6,269,900 | 166,027 | |
Bank of America Corp. | 11,600,200 | 142,450 | |
Principal Financial | |||
Group Inc. | 3,692,100 | 124,608 | |
* | UBS AG | ||
(New York Shares) | 5,871,200 | 117,424 | |
Weyerhaeuser Co. | 5,036,200 | 115,883 | |
BlackRock Inc. | 586,300 | 114,880 | |
Invesco Ltd. | 4,411,454 | 109,713 | |
* | Citigroup Inc. | 22,065,200 | 101,279 |
Banco Santander | |||
Brasil SA ADR | 7,600,000 | 88,236 | |
Travelers Cos. Inc. | 1,131,200 | 71,582 | |
EverestRe Group Ltd. | 766,502 | 69,844 | |
SwissReinsurance | |||
Co. Ltd. | 1,000,000 | 59,666 | |
PNC Financial Services | |||
Group Inc. | 797,300 | 49,704 | |
Morgan Stanley | 1,776,800 | 46,463 | |
* | UBS AG | 1,810,700 | 36,237 |
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial | |||
Group Inc. | 7,500,000 | 35,997 | |
Goldman Sachs | |||
Group Inc. | 217,900 | 32,905 | |
TD Ameritrade | |||
Holding Corp. | 1,471,540 | 31,697 | |
* | Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | ||
Class B | 335,700 | 27,964 | |
Moody’s Corp. | 600,000 | 23,484 | |
BB&T Corp. | 826,700 | 22,255 | |
Allstate Corp. | 388,400 | 13,143 | |
2,819,756 | |||
Health Care (15.3%) | |||
Pfizer Inc. | 14,217,900 | 298,007 | |
UnitedHealth Group Inc. | 5,166,600 | 254,352 | |
* | Amgen Inc. | 3,952,100 | 224,677 |
Medtronic Inc. | 4,218,000 | 176,102 | |
CIGNACorp. | 3,614,500 | 169,267 | |
Johnson & Johnson | 2,415,000 | 158,714 |
Market | |||
Value | |||
Shares | ($000) | ||
Merck & Co. Inc. | 3,285,200 | 118,103 | |
McKesson Corp. | 1,403,100 | 116,471 | |
Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd. | 5,796,000 | 113,888 | |
Teva Pharmaceutical | |||
Industries Ltd. ADR | 2,298,000 | 105,088 | |
* | Gilead Sciences Inc. | 2,416,600 | 93,861 |
Covidien plc | 1,602,700 | 89,254 | |
AstraZeneca plc ADR | 1,511,420 | 75,314 | |
Roche Holding AG | 399,438 | 64,837 | |
WellPoint Inc. | 796,500 | 61,163 | |
* | HCA Holdings Inc. | 1,396,900 | 45,818 |
* | Health Net Inc. | 650,000 | 21,645 |
2,186,561 | |||
Industrials (7.3%) | |||
Pentair Inc. | 3,848,800 | 154,568 | |
Dover Corp. | 1,872,600 | 127,412 | |
Textron Inc. | 4,762,400 | 124,299 | |
* | Delta Air Lines Inc. | 11,182,400 | 116,073 |
General Electric Co. | 4,872,600 | 99,645 | |
* | Fiat Industrial SPA | 5,950,000 | 88,393 |
Honeywell | |||
International Inc. | 1,248,900 | 76,470 | |
Northrop Grumman Corp. | 1,076,167 | 68,455 | |
United Parcel Service Inc. | |||
Class B | 717,000 | 53,753 | |
Ingersoll-Rand plc | 1,045,000 | 52,772 | |
Raytheon Co. | 642,300 | 31,184 | |
Parker Hannifin Corp. | 234,900 | 22,156 | |
SPXCorp. | 156,292 | 13,511 | |
Eaton Corp. | 149,200 | 7,987 | |
* | Huntington Ingalls | ||
Industries Inc. | 179,361 | 7,174 | |
1,043,852 | |||
Information Technology (11.6%) | |||
*,3 | Arrow Electronics Inc. | 6,825,250 | 311,163 |
ASML Holding NV ADR | 3,469,300 | 144,878 | |
Cisco Systems Inc. | 8,127,100 | 142,712 | |
Microsoft Corp. | 5,122,600 | 133,290 | |
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 3,055,100 | 123,335 | |
Western Union Co. | 5,645,700 | 119,971 | |
Texas Instruments Inc. | 3,247,600 | 115,387 | |
Avago Technologies Ltd. | 3,303,500 | 110,535 | |
Accenture plc Class A | 1,673,700 | 95,619 | |
* | Lam Research Corp. | 1,480,500 | 71,523 |
* | Cree Inc. | 1,721,400 | 70,130 |
* | Flextronics | ||
International Ltd. | 7,533,700 | 52,510 | |
* | Dell Inc. | 3,263,900 | 50,623 |
* | Motorola Solutions Inc. | 907,000 | 41,613 |
Corning Inc. | 1,602,500 | 33,556 | |
Intel Corp. | 1,142,400 | 26,492 | |
^ | Advanced Semiconductor | ||
Engineering Inc. ADR | 1,729,200 | 10,202 | |
TE Connectivity Ltd. | 3,014 | 108 | |
1,653,647 |
13
Windsor Fund
Market | |||
Value | |||
Shares | ($000) | ||
Materials (5.5%) | |||
* | Owens-IllinoisInc. | 4,074,800 | 120,899 |
Potash Corp. of | |||
Saskatchewan Inc. | 1,895,400 | 106,863 | |
Rexam plc | 13,504,190 | 88,258 | |
^ | HeidelbergCement AG | 1,034,009 | 79,068 |
Agrium Inc. | 863,000 | 78,041 | |
Monsanto Co. | 1,046,145 | 71,180 | |
Dow Chemical Co. | 1,700,000 | 69,683 | |
Incitec Pivot Ltd. | 11,000,000 | 45,526 | |
Alcoa Inc. | 2,676,700 | 45,504 | |
* | LyondellBasell Industries | ||
NV Class A | 556,600 | 24,769 | |
Commercial Metals Co. | 1,400,000 | 23,464 | |
Reliance Steel & | |||
Aluminum Co. | 335,000 | 18,964 | |
Steel Dynamics Inc. | 950,000 | 17,280 | |
789,499 | |||
Telecommunication Services (1.8%) | |||
AT&T Inc. | 4,583,700 | 142,645 | |
* | Sprint Nextel Corp. | 10,525,000 | 54,519 |
CenturyLink Inc. | 884,500 | 36,070 | |
Verizon | |||
Communications Inc. | 630,400 | 23,817 | |
257,051 | |||
Utilities (2.1%) | |||
PG&E Corp. | 2,098,500 | 96,699 | |
Northeast Utilities | 1,527,100 | 54,365 | |
Edison International | 1,015,000 | 39,859 | |
DTEEnergy Co. | 730,000 | 36,887 | |
NiSource Inc. | 1,255,200 | 24,414 | |
UGI Corp. | 711,400 | 23,689 | |
CMSEnergy Corp. | 1,149,000 | 22,750 | |
298,663 | |||
Total Common Stocks | |||
(Cost $11,080,274) | 13,922,158 |
Market | ||||
Value | ||||
Shares | ($000) | |||
Temporary Cash Investments (2.9%)1 | ||||
Money Market Fund (1.6%) | ||||
5,6 | Vanguard Market Liquidity | |||
Fund, 0.179% | 237,923,220 | 237,923 | ||
Face | ||||
Amount | ||||
($000) | ||||
Repurchase Agreement (1.2%) | ||||
Bank of America | ||||
Securities, LLC 0.040%, | ||||
5/2/11 (Dated 4/29/11, | ||||
Repurchase Value | ||||
$166,801,000, | ||||
collateralized by Federal | ||||
Home Loan Mortgage | ||||
Corp. 2.899%–2.970%, | ||||
12/1/40–1/1/41 and | ||||
Federal National Mortgage | ||||
Assn. 3.000%–3.465%, | ||||
12/1/40–1/1/41) | 166,800 | 166,800 | ||
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations (0.1%) | ||||
7,8 | Fannie Mae Discount | |||
Notes, 0.150%, 6/1/11 | 6,600 | 6,599 | ||
7,8 | Federal Home Loan Bank | |||
Discount Notes, | ||||
0.250%, 6/15/11 | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||
7,8 | Freddie Mac Discount | |||
Notes, 0.090%, 7/11/11 | 5,000 | 4,999 | ||
14,598 | ||||
Total Temporary Cash Investments | ||||
(Cost $419,321) | 419,321 | |||
Total Investments (100.4%) | ||||
(Cost $11,499,595) | 14,341,479 | |||
Other Assets and Liabilities (-0.4%) | ||||
Other Assets | 148,163 | |||
Liabilities6 | (210,471) | |||
(62,308) | ||||
Net Assets (100%) | 14,279,171 |
14
Windsor Fund
At April 30, 2011, net assets consisted of: | |
Amount | |
($000) | |
Paid-in Capital | 15,114,621 |
Undistributed Net Investment Income | 28,689 |
Accumulated Net Realized Losses | (3,714,571) |
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
Investment Securities | 2,841,884 |
Futures Contracts | 8,194 |
Forward Currency Contracts | 225 |
Foreign Currencies | 129 |
Net Assets | 14,279,171 |
Investor Shares—Net Assets | |
Applicable to 566,463,231 outstanding | |
$.001 par value shares of beneficial | |
interest (unlimited authorization) | 8,315,083 |
Net Asset Value Per Share— | |
Investor Shares | $14.68 |
Admiral Shares—Net Assets | |
Applicable to 120,393,447 outstanding | |
$.001 par value shares of beneficial | |
interest (unlimited authorization) | 5,964,088 |
Net Asset Value Per Share— | |
Admiral Shares | $49.54 |
See Note A in Notes to Financial Statements.
* Non-income-producing security.
^ Part of security position is on loan to broker-dealers. The total value of securities on loan is $86,178,000.
1 The fund invests a portion of its cash reserves in equity markets through the use of index futures contracts. After giving effect to futures investments, the fund’s effective common stock and temporary cash investment positions represent 98.6% and 1.8%, respectively, of net assets.
2 Restricted security represents 1.5% of net assets. Shares not applicable for this private placement.
3 Considered an affiliated company of the fund as the fund owns more than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of such company.
4 Considered an affiliated company of the fund as the issuer is another member of The Vanguard Group.
5 Affiliated money market fund available only to Vanguard funds and certain trusts and accounts managed by Vanguard. Rate shown is the 7-day yield.
6 Includes $91,159,000 of collateral received for securities on loan.
7 Securities with a value of $12,098,000 have been segregated as initial margin for open futures contracts.
8 The issuer operates under a congressional charter; its securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
ADR—American Depositary Receipt.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
15
Windsor Fund
Statement of Operations | |
SixMonths Ended | |
April 30, 2011 | |
($000) | |
Investment Income | |
Income | |
Dividends1,2 | 105,887 |
Interest2 | 296 |
Security Lending | 535 |
Total Income | 106,718 |
Expenses | |
Investment Advisory Fees—Note B | |
Basic Fee | 8,575 |
Performance Adjustment | 1,570 |
The Vanguard Group—Note C | |
Management and Administrative—Investor Shares | 8,143 |
Management and Administrative—Admiral Shares | 3,047 |
Marketing and Distribution—Investor Shares | 845 |
Marketing and Distribution—Admiral Shares | 469 |
Custodian Fees | 138 |
Shareholders’ Reports—Investor Shares | 66 |
Shareholders’ Reports—Admiral Shares | 18 |
Trustees’ Fees and Expenses | 13 |
Total Expenses | 22,884 |
Expenses Paid Indirectly | (368) |
Net Expenses | 22,516 |
Net Investment Income | 84,202 |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | |
Investment Securities Sold2 | 769,599 |
Futures Contracts | 18,466 |
Foreign Currencies and Forward Currency Contracts | 231 |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | 788,296 |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
Investment Securities | 1,304,671 |
Futures Contracts | 4,105 |
Foreign Currencies and Forward Currency Contracts | 227 |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | 1,309,003 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 2,181,501 |
1 Dividends are net of foreign withholding taxes of $1,404,000.
2 Dividend income, interest income, and realized net gain (loss) from affiliated companies of the fund were $3,262,000, $165,000, and $19,019,000, respectively.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
16
Windsor Fund
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | ||
Six Months Ended | Year Ended | |
April 30, | October 31, | |
2011 | 2010 | |
($000) | ($000) | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||
Operations | ||
Net Investment Income | 84,202 | 205,559 |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | 788,296 | 118,095 |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | 1,309,003 | 1,543,926 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 2,181,501 | 1,867,580 |
Distributions | ||
Net Investment Income | ||
Investor Shares | (45,849) | (126,673) |
Admiral Shares | (33,960) | (75,870) |
Realized Capital Gain | ||
Investor Shares | — | — |
Admiral Shares | — | — |
Total Distributions | (79,809) | (202,543) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Investor Shares | (929,792) | (684,753) |
Admiral Shares | 427,941 | (113,168) |
Net Increase (Decrease) from Capital Share Transactions | (501,851) | (797,921) |
Total Increase (Decrease) | 1,599,841 | 867,116 |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of Period | 12,679,330 | 11,812,214 |
End of Period1 | 14,279,171 | 12,679,330 |
1 Net Assets—End of Period includes undistributed net investment income of $28,689,000 and $24,065,000. |
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
17
Windsor Fund
Financial Highlights
Investor Shares | ||||||
Six Months | ||||||
Ended | ||||||
For a Share Outstanding | April 30, | Year Ended October 31, | ||||
Throughout Each Period | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $12.56 | $10.97 | $9.51 | $19.52 | $19.27 | $17.81 |
Investment Operations | ||||||
Net Investment Income | .083 | .1901 | .197 | .279 | .298 | .277 |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||||||
on Investments | 2.115 | 1.586 | 1.486 | (7.985) | 1.782 | 3.007 |
Total from Investment Operations | 2.198 | 1.776 | 1.683 | (7.706) | 2.080 | 3.284 |
Distributions | ||||||
Dividends from Net Investment Income | (.078) | (.186) | (.223) | (.289) | (.301) | (.265) |
Distributions from Realized Capital Gains | — | — | — | (2.015) | (1.529) | (1.559) |
Total Distributions | (.078) | (.186) | (.223) | (2.304) | (1.830) | (1.824) |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $14.68 | $12.56 | $10.97 | $9.51 | $19.52 | $19.27 |
Total Return2 | 17.56% | 16.31% | 18.22% | -43.88% | 11.24% | 19.72% |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (Millions) | $8,315 | $7,999 | $7,610 | $7,041 | $14,490 | $14,140 |
Ratio of Total Expenses to | ||||||
Average Net Assets3 | 0.38% | 0.33% | 0.33% | 0.30% | 0.31% | 0.36% |
Ratio of Net Investment Income to | ||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.20% | 1.59%1 | 2.03% | 1.91% | 1.50% | 1.50% |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 51% | 50% | 61%4 | 55% | 40% | 38% |
The expense ratio, net income ratio, and turnover rate for the current period have been annualized.
1 Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income to average net assets include $.036 and 0.29%, respectively, resulting from a cash payment received in connection with the merger of Schering-Plough Corp. and Merck & Co. in November 2009.
2 Total returns do not include account service fees that may have applied in the periods shown. Fund prospectuses provide information about any applicable account service fees.
3 Includes performance-based investment advisory fee increases (decreases) of 0.02%, (0.03%), (0.05%), (0.03%), (0.01%), and 0.02%.
4 Excludes the value of portfolio securities received or delivered as a result of in-kind purchases or redemptions of the fund’s capital shares.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
18
Windsor Fund
Financial Highlights
Admiral Shares | ||||||
Six Months | ||||||
Ended | ||||||
For a Share Outstanding | April 30, | Year Ended October 31, | ||||
Throughout Each Period | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $42.37 | $37.01 | $32.08 | $65.90 | $65.04 | $60.12 |
Investment Operations | ||||||
Net Investment Income | .301 | .6851 | .701 | .999 | 1.085 | 1.000 |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||||||
on Investments | 7.150 | 5.348 | 5.020 | (26.974) | 6.019 | 10.150 |
Total from Investment Operations | 7.451 | 6.033 | 5.721 | (25.975) | 7.104 | 11.150 |
Distributions | ||||||
Dividends from Net Investment Income | (.281) | (.673) | (.791) | (1.047) | (1.085) | (.970) |
Distributions from Realized Capital Gains | — | — | — | (6.798) | (5.159) | (5.260) |
Total Distributions | (.281) | (.673) | (.791) | (7.845) | (6.244) | (6.230) |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $49.54 | $42.37 | $37.01 | $32.08 | $65.90 | $65.04 |
Total Return | 17.65% | 16.44% | 18.38% | -43.85% | 11.38% | 19.85% |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (Millions) | $5,964 | $4,680 | $4,203 | $4,723 | $9,770 | $8,987 |
Ratio of Total Expenses to | ||||||
Average Net Assets2 | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.17% | 0.19% | 0.25% |
Ratio of Net Investment Income to | ||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.30% | 1.70%1 | 2.16% | 2.04% | 1.62% | 1.61% |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 51% | 50% | 61%3 | 55% | 40% | 38% |
The expense ratio, net income ratio, and turnover rate for the current period have been annualized.
1 Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income to average net assets include $.120 and 0.29%, respectively, resulting from a cash payment received in connection with the merger of Schering-Plough Corp. and Merck & Co. in November 2009.
2 Includes performance-based investment advisory fee increases (decreases) of 0.02%, (0.03%), (0.05%), (0.03%), (0.01%), and 0.02%.
3 Excludes the value of portfolio securities received or delivered as a result of in-kind purchases or redemptions of the fund’s capital shares.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
19
Windsor Fund
Notes to Financial Statements
Vanguard Windsor Fund is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end investment company, or mutual fund. The fund offers two classes of shares: Investor Shares and Admiral Shares. Investor Shares are available to any investor who meets the fund’s minimum purchase requirements. Admiral Shares are designed for investors who meet certain administrative, service, and account-size criteria.
A. The following significant accounting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles for U.S. mutual funds. The fund consistently follows such policies in preparing its financial statements.
1. Security Valuation: Securities are valued as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m., Eastern time) on the valuation date. Equity securities are valued at the latest quoted sales prices or official closing prices taken from the primary market in which each security trades; such securities not traded on the valuation date are valued at the mean of the latest quoted bid and asked prices. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or whose values have been affected by events occurring before the fund’s pricing time but after the close of the securities’ primary markets, are valued at their fair values calculated according to procedures adopted by the board of trustees. These procedures include obtaining quotations from an independent pricing service, monitoring news to identify significant market- or security-specific events, and evaluating changes in the values of foreign market proxies (for example, ADRs, futures contracts, or exchange-traded funds), between the time the foreign markets close and the fund’s pricing time. When fair-value pricing is employed, the prices of securities used by a fund to calculate its net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same securities. Investments in Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund are valued at that fund’s net asset value. Temporary cash investments acquired over 60 days to maturity are valued using the latest bid prices or using valuations based on a matrix system (which considers such factors as security prices, yields, maturities, and ratings), both as furnished by independent pricing services. Other temporary cash investments are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.
2. Foreign Currency: Securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates obtained from an independent third party as of the fund’s pricing time on the valuation date. Realized gains (losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investment securities include the effects of changes in exchange rates since the securities were purchased, combined with the effects of changes in security prices. Fluctuations in the value of other assets and liabilities resulting from changes in exchange rates are recorded as unrealized foreign currency gains (losses) until the assets or liabilities are settled in cash, at which time they are recorded as realized foreign currency gains (losses).
3. Futures and Forward Currency Contracts: The fund uses index futures contracts to a limited extent, with the objective of maintaining full exposure to the stock market while maintaining liquidity. The fund may purchase or sell futures contracts to achieve a desired level of investment, whether to accommodate portfolio turnover or cash flows from capital share transactions. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are imperfect correlation between changes in market values of stocks held by the fund and the prices of futures contracts, and the possibility of an illiquid market.
The fund also enters into forward currency contracts to protect the value of securities and related receivables and payables against changes in foreign exchange rates. The primary risk associated with the fund’s use of these contracts is that a counterparty will fail to fulfill its obligation to pay gains due to the fund under the contracts.
20
Windsor Fund
Futures contracts are valued at their quoted daily settlement prices. Forward currency contracts are valued at their quoted daily prices obtained from an independent third party, adjusted for currency risk based on the expiration date of each contract. The aggregate principal amounts of the contracts are not recorded in the Statement of Net Assets. Fluctuations in the value of the contracts are recorded in the Statement of Net Assets as an asset (liability) and in the Statement of Operations as unrealized appreciation (depreciation) until the contracts are closed, when they are recorded as realized gains (losses) on futures or forward currency contracts.
4. Repurchase Agreements: The fund invests in repurchase agreements. Securities pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements are held by a custodian bank until the agreements mature. Each agreement requires that the market value of the collateral be sufficient to cover payments of interest and principal; however, in the event of default or bankruptcy by the other party to the agreement, retention of the collateral may be subject to legal proceedings.
5. Federal Income Taxes: The fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income. Management has analyzed the fund’s tax positions taken for all open federal income tax years (October 31, 2007–2010), and for the period ended April 30, 2011, and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in the fund’s financial statements.
6. Distributions: Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
7. Security Lending: The fund may lend its securities to qualified institutional borrowers to earn additional income. Security loans are required to be secured at all times by collateral at least equal to the market value of securities loaned. The fund invests cash collateral received in Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund, and records a liability for the return of the collateral, during the period the securities are on loan. Security lending income represents fees charged to borrowers plus income earned on investing cash collateral, less expenses associated with the loan.
8. Other: Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income includes income distributions received from Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund and is accrued daily. Security transactions are accounted for on the date securities are bought or sold. Costs used to determine realized gains (losses) on the sale of investment securities are those of the specific securities sold.
Each class of shares has equal rights as to assets and earnings, except that each class separately bears certain class-specific expenses related to maintenance of shareholder accounts (included in Management and Administrative expenses) and shareholder reporting. Marketing and distribution expenses are allocated to each class of shares based on a method approved by the board of trustees. Income, other non-class-specific expenses, and gains and losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
B. AllianceBernstein L.P. and Wellington Management Company, LLP, each provide investment advisory services to a portion of the fund for a fee calculated at an annual percentage rate of average net assets managed by the advisor. The basic fees of each advisor are subject to quarterly adjustments based on performance for the preceding three years relative to a designated market index: for AllianceBernstein L.P., the Russell 1000 Value Index; and for Wellington Management Company, LLP, the S&P 500 Index.
The Vanguard Group manages the cash reserves of the fund on an at-cost basis.
For the six months ended April 30, 2011, the aggregate investment advisory fee represented an effective annual basic rate of 0.13% of the fund’s average net assets, before an increase of $1,570,000 (0.02%) based on performance.
21
Windsor Fund
C. The Vanguard Group furnishes at cost corporate management, administrative, marketing, and distribution services. The costs of such services are allocated to the fund under methods approved by the board of trustees. The fund has committed to provide up to 0.40% of its net assets in capital contributions to Vanguard. At April 30, 2011, the fund had contributed capital of $2,264,000 to Vanguard (included in Other Assets), representing 0.02% of the fund’s net assets and 0.91% of Vanguard’s capitalization. The fund’s trustees and officers are also directors and officers of Vanguard.
D. The fund has asked its investment advisors to direct certain security trades, subject to obtaining the best price and execution, to brokers who have agreed to rebate to the fund part of the commissions generated. Such rebates are used solely to reduce the fund’s management and administrative expenses. For the six months ended April 30, 2011, these arrangements reduced the fund’s expenses by $368,000 (an annual rate of 0.01% of average net assets).
E. Various inputs may be used to determine the value of the fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels for financial statement purposes. The inputs or methodologies used to value securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
Level 2—Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—Significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions used to determine the fair value of investments).
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investments | ($000) | ($000) | ($000) |
Common Stocks | 12,838,499 | 870,893 | 212,766 |
Temporary Cash Investments | 237,923 | 181,398 | — |
Futures Contracts—Assets1 | 564 | — | — |
Forward Currency Contracts—Assets | — | 225 | — |
Total | 13,076,986 | 1,052,516 | 212,766 |
1 Represents variation margin on the last day of the reporting period. |
The following table summarizes changes in investments valued based on Level 3 inputs during the six months ended April 30, 2011:
Investments in | |
Common Stocks | |
Amount Valued Based on Level 3 Inputs | ($000) |
Balance as of October 31, 2010 | 206,299 |
Transfers out of Level 3 | (24,847) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | 31,314 |
Balance as of April 30, 2011 | 212,766 |
22
Windsor Fund
F. At April 30, 2011, the fair value of derivatives were reflected in the Statement of Net Assets as follows:
Foreign | |||
Equity | Exchange | ||
Contracts1 | Contracts | Total | |
Statement of Net Assets Caption | ($000) | ($000) | ($000) |
Other Assets | 564 | 225 | 789 |
1 Represents variation margin on the last day of the reporting period. |
Realized net gain (loss) and the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives for the six months ended April 30, 2011, were:
Foreign | |||
Equity | Exchange | ||
Contracts | Contracts | Total | |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) on Derivatives | ($000) | ($000) | ($000) |
Futures Contracts | 18,466 | — | 18,466 |
Forward Currency Contracts | — | — | — |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) on Derivatives | 18,466 | — | 18,466 |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Derivatives | |||
Futures Contracts | 4,105 | — | 4,105 |
Forward Currency Contracts | — | 225 | 225 |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Derivatives | 4,105 | 225 | 4,330 |
At April 30, 2011, the aggregate settlement value of open futures contracts and the related unrealized appreciation (depreciation) were:
($000) | ||||
Aggregate | ||||
Number of | Settlement | Unrealized | ||
Long (Short) | Value | Appreciation | ||
Futures Contracts | Expiration | Contracts | Long (Short) | (Depreciation) |
E-mini S&P 500 Index | June 2011 | 1,100 | 74,784 | 2,650 |
S&P 500 Index | June 2011 | 144 | 48,949 | 2,867 |
S&P MidCap 400 Index | June 2011 | 51 | 25,844 | 2,079 |
E-mini S&P MidCap 400 Index | June 2011 | 80 | 8,108 | 598 |
23
Windsor Fund
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on open futures contracts is required to be treated as realized gain (loss) for tax purposes.
At April 30, 2011, the fund had open forward currency contracts to receive and deliver currencies as follows. Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on open forward currency contracts is treated as realized gain (loss) for tax purposes.
Unrealized | ||||||
Contract | Appreciation | |||||
Settlement | Contract Amount (000) | (Depreciation) | ||||
Counterparty | Date | Receive | Deliver | ($000) | ||
UBS AG | 9/16/11 | USD | 100,224 | JPY | 8,112,500 | 149 |
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. | 9/16/11 | USD | 100,151 | JPY | 8,112,500 | 76 |
JPY—Japanese yen. | ||||||
USD—U.S. dollar. |
G. Distributions are determined on a tax basis and may differ from net investment income and realized capital gains for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statements to reflect their tax character. Temporary differences arise when certain items of income, expense, gain, or loss are recognized in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes; these differences will reverse at some time in the future. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes.
During the six months ended April 30, 2011, the fund realized net foreign currency gains of $231,000, which increased distributable net income for tax purposes; accordingly, such gains have been reclass-ified from accumulated net realized losses to undistributed net investment income.
The fund’s tax-basis capital gains and losses are determined only at the end of each fiscal year. For tax purposes, at October 31, 2010, the fund had available capital loss carryforwards totaling $4,497,216,000 to offset future net capital gains of $2,266,771,000 through October 31, 2016, and $2,230,445,000 through October 31, 2017. The fund will use these capital losses to offset net taxable capital gains, if any, realized during the year ending October 31, 2011; should the fund realize net capital losses for the year, the losses will be added to the loss carryforward balance above.
At April 30, 2011, the cost of investment securities for tax purposes was $11,499,595,000. Net unrealized appreciation of investment securities for tax purposes was $2,841,884,000, consisting of unrealized gains of $3,096,283,000 on securities that had risen in value since their purchase and $254,399,000 in unrealized losses on securities that had fallen in value since their purchase.
H. During the six months ended April 30, 2011, the fund purchased $3,385,906,000 of investment securities and sold $3,997,361,000 of investment securities, other than temporary cash investments.
24
Windsor Fund
I. Capital share transactions for each class of shares were:
Six Months Ended | Year Ended | |||
April 30, 2011 | October 31, 2010 | |||
Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | |
($000) | (000) | ($000) | (000) | |
Investor Shares | ||||
Issued | 352,609 | 25,462 | 749,394 | 62,784 |
Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 44,845 | 3,332 | 123,675 | 10,531 |
Redeemed | (1,327,246) | (99,434) | (1,557,822) | (130,102) |
Net Increase (Decrease)—Investor Shares | (929,792) | (70,640) | (684,753) | (56,787) |
Admiral Shares | ||||
Issued | 704,190 | 15,874 | 419,342 | 10,255 |
Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 30,539 | 673 | 67,848 | 1,713 |
Redeemed | (306,788) | (6,607) | (600,358) | (15,059) |
Net Increase (Decrease)—Admiral Shares | 427,941 | 9,940 | (113,168) | (3,091) |
J. Certain of the fund’s investments are in companies that are considered to be affiliated companies of the fund because the fund owns more than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of the company.
Transactions during the period in securities of these companies were as follows:
Current Period Transactions | |||||
October 31, 2010 | Proceeds from | April 30, 2011 | |||
Market | Purchases | Securities | Dividend | Market | |
Value | at Cost | Sold | Income | Value | |
($000) | ($000) | ($000) | ($000) | ($000) | |
Arrow Electronics Inc. | 231,114 | — | 40,665 | — | 311,163 |
MDC Holdings Inc. | 80,802 | 5,767 | — | 1,569 | 97,434 |
311,916 | 1,569 | 408,597 |
K. In preparing the financial statements as of April 30, 2011, management considered the impact of subsequent events for potential recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.
25
About Your Fund’s Expenses
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur ongoing costs, which include costs for portfolio management, administrative services, and shareholder reports (like this one), among others. Operating expenses, which are deducted from a fund’s gross income, directly reduce the investment return of the fund.
A fund’s expenses are expressed as a percentage of its average net assets. This figure is known as the expense ratio. The following examples are intended to help you understand the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with those of other mutual funds. The examples are based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period shown and held for the entire period.
The accompanying table illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:
• Based on actual fund return. This section helps you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The ”Ending Account Value“ shown is derived from the fund‘s actual return, and the third column shows the dollar amount that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the fund. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.
To do so, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number given for your fund under the heading ”Expenses Paid During Period.“
• Based on hypothetical 5% yearly return. This section is intended to help you compare your fund‘s costs with those of other mutual funds. It assumes that the fund had a yearly return of 5% before expenses, but that the expense ratio is unchanged. In this case—because the return used is not the fund’s actual return—the results do not apply to your investment. The example is useful in making comparisons because the Securities and Exchange Commission requires all mutual funds to calculate expenses based on a 5% return. You can assess your fund’s costs by comparing this hypothetical example with the hypothetical examples that appear in shareholder reports of other funds.
Note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare ongoing costs only and do not reflect transaction costs incurred by the fund for buying and selling securities. Further, the expenses do not include any purchase, redemption, or account service fees described in the fund prospectus. If such fees were applied to your account, your costs would be higher. Your fund does not carry a “sales load.”
The calculations assume no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.
You can find more information about the fund’s expenses, including annual expense ratios, in the Financial Statements section of this report. For additional information on operating expenses and other shareholder costs, please refer to your fund’s current prospectus.
26
Six Months Ended April 30, 2011 | |||
Beginning | Ending | Expenses | |
Account Value | Account Value | Paid During | |
Windsor Fund | 10/31/2010 | 4/30/2011 | Period |
Based on Actual Fund Return | |||
Investor Shares | $1,000.00 | $1,175.56 | $2.05 |
Admiral Shares | 1,000.00 | 1,176.46 | 1.51 |
Based on Hypothetical 5% Yearly Return | |||
Investor Shares | $1,000.00 | $1,022.91 | $1.91 |
Admiral Shares | 1,000.00 | 1,023.41 | 1.40 |
The calculations are based on expenses incurred in the most recent six-month period. The fund’s annualized six-month expense ratios for that period are 0.38% for Investor Shares and 0.28% for Admiral Shares. The dollar amounts shown as “Expenses Paid” are equal to the annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by the number of days in the most recent 12-month period.
27
Trustees Approve Advisory Agreements
The board of trustees of Vanguard Windsor Fund has renewed the fund’s investment advisory agreements with Wellington Management Company, LLP, and AllianceBernstein L.P. The board determined that the retention of the advisors was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
The board based its decision upon an evaluation of each advisor’s investment staff, portfolio management process, and performance. The trustees considered the factors discussed below, among others. However, no single factor determined whether the board approved the agreements. Rather, it was the totality of the circumstances that drove the board’s decision.
Nature, extent, and quality of services
The board considered the quality of the fund’s investment management over both the short and long term, and took into account the organizational depth and stability of each advisor. The board noted the following:
Wellington Management Company, LLP. Founded in 1928, Wellington Management is among the nation’s oldest and most respected institutional investment managers. Using a bottom-up, fundamentally driven approach, Wellington Management invests in out-of-favor stocks that offer the combination of attractive valuations and underappreciated longer-term earnings growth projections. The advisor has the ability to seek undervalued stocks across the capitalization spectrum. The research-intensive approach is supported by the team’s deep and tenured analytical staff, which may also make use of Wellington Management’s extensive industry research capabilities. The firm has advised the fund since its inception in 1958.
AllianceBernstein L.P. AllianceBernstein is a global asset management firm that provides diversified investment management services involving growth and value equities, blend strategies, and fixed income securities to clients worldwide. The investment team employs a bottom-up, research-driven, value-based equity investment philosophy. It relies on substantial investment research resources to identify companies and industries that may be undergoing stress. It seeks to exploit mispricings created by investor overreaction, relying primarily on a proprietary dividend discount model to determine valuations. The resulting portfolio has specific risk and return expectations compared with the Russell 1000 Value Index. AllianceBernstein has managed a portion of the fund since 1999.
The board concluded that each advisor’s experience, stability, depth, and performance, among other factors, warranted continuation of the advisory agreements.
Investment performance
The board considered the short- and long-term performance of the fund, including any periods of outperformance or underperformance of a relevant benchmark and peer group. The board concluded that each advisor has carried out the fund’s investment strategy in disciplined fashion and that performance results have allowed the fund to remain competitive versus its benchmark and its peers. Information about the fund’s most recent performance can be found in the Performance Summary section of this report.
Cost
The board concluded that the fund’s expense ratio was well below the average expense ratio charged by funds in its peer group and that the fund’s advisory fee rate was also well below the peer-group average. Information about the fund’s expenses appears in the About Your Fund’s Expenses section of this report as well as in the Financial Statements section, which also includes information about the advisory fee rate.
28
The board did not consider profitability of Wellington Management and AllianceBernstein in determining whether to approve the advisory fees, because the firms are independent of Vanguard and the advisory fees are the result of arm’s-length negotiations.
The benefit of economies of scale
The board concluded that the fund’s shareholders benefit from economies of scale because of breakpoints in the advisory fee schedules for the advisors. The breakpoints reduce the effective rate of the fees as the fund’s assets managed by each advisor increase.
The board will consider whether to renew the advisory agreements again after a one-year period.
29
Glossary
30-Day SEC Yield. A fund’s 30-day SEC yield is derived using a formula specified by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the formula, data related to the fund’s security holdings in the previous 30 days are used to calculate the fund’s hypothetical net income for that period, which is then annualized and divided by the fund’s estimated average net assets over the calculation period. For the purposes of this calculation, a security’s income is based on its current market yield to maturity (in the case of bonds) or its projected dividend yield (for stocks). Because the SEC yield represents hypothetical annualized income, it will differ—at times significantly—from the fund’s actual experience. As a result, the fund’s income distributions may be higher or lower than implied by the SEC yield.
Beta. A measure of the magnitude of a fund’s past share-price fluctuations in relation to the ups and downs of a given market index. The index is assigned a beta of 1.00. Compared with a given index, a fund with a beta of 1.20 typically would have seen its share price rise or fall by 12% when the index rose or fell by 10%. For this report, beta is based on returns over the past 36 months for both the fund and the index. Note that a fund’s beta should be reviewed in conjunction with its R-squared (see definition). The lower the R-squared, the less correlation there is between the fund and the index, and the less reliable beta is as an indicator of volatility.
Dividend Yield. Dividend income earned by stocks, expressed as a percentage of the aggregate market value (or of net asset value, for a fund). The yield is determined by dividing the amount of the annual dividends by the aggregate value (or net asset value) at the end of the period. For a fund, the dividend yield is based solely on stock holdings and does not include any income produced by other investments.
Earnings Growth Rate. The average annual rate of growth in earnings over the past five years for the stocks now in a fund.
Equity Exposure. A measure that reflects a fund’s investments in stocks and stock futures. Any holdings in short-term reserves are excluded.
Expense Ratio. The percentage of a fund’s average net assets used to pay its annual administrative and advisory expenses. These expenses directly reduce returns to investors.
Foreign Holdings. The percentage of a fund represented by stocks or depositary receipts of companies based outside the United States.
Inception Date. The date on which the assets of a fund (or one of its share classes) are first invested in accordance with the fund’s investment objective. For funds with a subscription period, the inception date is the day after that period ends. Investment performance is measured from the inception date.
Median Market Cap. An indicator of the size of companies in which a fund invests; the midpoint of market capitalization (market price x shares outstanding) of a fund’s stocks, weighted by the proportion of the fund’s assets invested in each stock. Stocks representing half of the fund’s assets have market capitalizations above the median, and the rest are below it.
Price/Book Ratio. The share price of a stock divided by its net worth, or book value, per share. For a fund, the weighted average price/book ratio of the stocks it holds.
30
Price/Earnings Ratio. The ratio of a stock’s current price to its per-share earnings over the past year. For a fund, the weighted average P/E of the stocks it holds. P/E is an indicator of market expectations about corporate prospects; the higher the P/E, the greater the expectations for a company’s future growth.
R-Squared. A measure of how much of a fund’s past returns can be explained by the returns from the market in general, as measured by a given index. If a fund’s total returns were precisely synchronized with an index’s returns, its R-squared would be 1.00. If the fund’s returns bore no relationship to the index’s returns, its R-squared would be 0. For this report, R-squared is based on returns over the past 36 months for both the fund and the index.
Return on Equity. The annual average rate of return generated by a company during the past five years for each dollar of shareholder’s equity (net income divided by shareholder’s equity). For a fund, the weighted average return on equity for the companies whose stocks it holds.
Short-Term Reserves. The percentage of a fund invested in highly liquid, short-term securities that can be readily converted to cash.
Turnover Rate. An indication of the fund’s trading activity. Funds with high turnover rates incur higher transaction costs and may be more likely to distribute capital gains (which may be taxable to investors). The turnover rate excludes in-kind transactions, which have minimal impact on costs.
31
The People Who Govern Your Fund
The trustees of your mutual fund are there to see that the fund is operated and managed in your best interests since, as a shareholder, you are a part owner of the fund. Your fund’s trustees also serve on the board of directors of The Vanguard Group, Inc., which is owned by the Vanguard funds and provides services to them on an at-cost basis.
A majority of Vanguard’s board members are independent, meaning that they have no affiliation with Vanguard or the funds they oversee, apart from the sizable personal investments they have made as private individuals. The independent board members have distinguished backgrounds in business, academia, and public service. Each of the trustees and executive officers oversees 179 Vanguard funds.
The following table provides information for each trustee and executive officer of the fund. More information about the trustees is in the Statement of Additional Information, which can be obtained, without charge, by contacting Vanguard at 800-662-7447, or online at vanguard.com.
Interested Trustee1 | and President (2006–2008) of Rohm and Haas Co. |
(chemicals); Director of Tyco International, Ltd. | |
F. William McNabb III | (diversified manufacturing and services) and Hewlett- |
Born 1957. Trustee Since July 2009. Chairman of the | Packard Co. (electronic computer manufacturing); |
Board. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five | Senior Advisor at New Mountain Capital; Trustee |
Years: Chairman of the Board of The Vanguard Group, | of The Conference Board; Member of the Board of |
Inc., and of each of the investment companies served | Managers of Delphi Automotive LLP (automotive |
by The Vanguard Group, since January 2010; Director | components). |
of The Vanguard Group since 2008; Chief Executive | |
Officer and President of The Vanguard Group and of | Amy Gutmann |
each of the investment companies served by The | Born 1949. Trustee Since June 2006. Principal |
Vanguard Group since 2008; Director of Vanguard | Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: President |
Marketing Corporation; Managing Director of The | of the University of Pennsylvania; Christopher H. |
Vanguard Group (1995–2008). | Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science |
in the School of Arts and Sciences with secondary | |
appointments at the Annenberg School for Commu- | |
Independent Trustees | nication and the Graduate School of Education |
of the University of Pennsylvania; Director of | |
Emerson U. Fullwood | Carnegie Corporation of New York, Schuylkill River |
Born 1948. Trustee Since January 2008. Principal | Development Corporation, and Greater Philadelphia |
Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Executive | Chamber of Commerce; Trustee of the National |
Chief Staff and Marketing Officer for North America | Constitution Center; Chair of the Presidential |
and Corporate Vice President (retired 2008) of Xerox | Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. |
Corporation (document management products and | |
services); Executive in Residence and 2010 | JoAnn Heffernan Heisen |
Distinguished Minett Professor at the Rochester | Born 1950. Trustee Since July 1998. Principal |
Institute of Technology; Director of SPX Corporation | Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Corporate |
(multi-industry manufacturing), the United Way of | Vice President and Chief Global Diversity Officer |
Rochester, Amerigroup Corporation (managed health | (retired 2008) and Member of the Executive |
care), the University of Rochester Medical Center, | Committee (1997–2008) of Johnson & Johnson |
Monroe Community College Foundation, and North | (pharmaceuticals/consumer products); Director of |
Carolina A&T University. | Skytop Lodge Corporation (hotels), the University |
Medical Center at Princeton, the Robert Wood | |
Rajiv L. Gupta | Johnson Foundation, and the Center for Work Life |
Born 1945. Trustee Since December 2001. 2 | Policy; Member of the Advisory Board of the |
Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: | Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (retired 2009) | at Syracuse University. |
F. Joseph Loughrey | Thomas J. Higgins | |
Born 1949. Trustee Since October 2009. Principal | Born 1957. Chief Financial Officer Since September | |
Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: President | 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five | |
and Chief Operating Officer (retired 2009) and Vice | Years: Principal of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Chief | |
Chairman of the Board (2008–2009) of Cummins Inc. | Financial Officer of each of the investment companies | |
(industrial machinery); Director of SKF AB (industrial | served by The Vanguard Group since 2008; Treasurer | |
machinery), Hillenbrand, Inc. (specialized consumer | of each of the investment companies served by The | |
services), the Lumina Foundation for Education, and | Vanguard Group (1998–2008). | |
Oxfam America; Chairman of the Advisory Council | ||
for the College of Arts and Letters and Member | Kathryn J. Hyatt | |
of the Advisory Board to the Kellogg Institute for | Born 1955. Treasurer Since November 2008. Principal | |
International Studies at the University of Notre Dame. | Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Principal | |
of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Treasurer of each of | ||
André F. Perold | the investment companies served by The Vanguard | |
Born 1952. Trustee Since December 2004. Principal | Group since 2008; Assistant Treasurer of each of the | |
Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: George | investment companies served by The Vanguard Group | |
Gund Professor of Finance and Banking at the Harvard | (1988–2008). | |
Business School; Chair of the Investment Committee | ||
of HighVista Strategies LLC (private investment firm). | Heidi Stam | |
Born 1956. Secretary Since July 2005. Principal | ||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Managing | |
Born 1941. Trustee Since January 1993. Principal | Director of The Vanguard Group, Inc., since 2006; | |
Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Chairman, | General Counsel of The Vanguard Group since 2005; | |
President, and Chief Executive Officer of NACCO | Secretary of The Vanguard Group and of each of the | |
Industries, Inc. (forklift trucks/housewares/lignite); | investment companies served by The Vanguard Group | |
Director of Goodrich Corporation (industrial products/ | since 2005; Director and Senior Vice President of | |
aircraft systems and services) and the National | Vanguard Marketing Corporation since 2005; | |
Association of Manufacturers; Chairman of the | Principal of The Vanguard Group (1997–2006). | |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland; Vice Chairman | ||
of University Hospitals of Cleveland; President of | ||
the Board of The Cleveland Museum of Art. | Vanguard Senior Management Team | |
Peter F. Volanakis | R. Gregory Barton | Michael S. Miller |
Born 1955. Trustee Since July 2009. Principal | Mortimer J. Buckley | James M. Norris |
Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: President | Kathleen C. Gubanich | Glenn W. Reed |
and Chief Operating Officer (retired 2010) of Corning | Paul A. Heller | George U. Sauter |
Incorporated (communications equipment); Director of | Martha G. King | |
Corning Incorporated (2000–2010) and Dow Corning | ||
(2001–2010); Overseer of the Amos Tuck School of | ||
Business Administration at Dartmouth College. | Chairman Emeritus and Senior Advisor | |
John J. Brennan | ||
Executive Officers | Chairman, 1996–2009 | |
Chief Executive Officer and President, 1996–2008 | ||
Glenn Booraem | ||
Born 1967. Controller Since July 2010. Principal | ||
Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Principal | Founder | |
of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Controller of each of | ||
the investment companies served by The Vanguard | John C. Bogle | |
Group since 2010; Assistant Controller of each of | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, 1974–1996 | |
the investment companies served by The Vanguard | ||
Group (2001–2010). |
1 Mr. McNabb is considered an “interested person,” as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, because he is an officer of the Vanguard funds.
2 December 2002 for Vanguard Equity Income Fund, Vanguard Growth Equity Fund, the Vanguard Municipal Bond Funds, and the Vanguard State Tax-Exempt Funds.
P.O. Box 2600 | |
Valley Forge, PA 19482-2600 |
Connect with Vanguard® > vanguard.com
Fund Information > 800-662-7447 | |
Direct Investor Account Services > 800-662-2739 | |
Institutional Investor Services > 800-523-1036 | |
Text Telephone for People | |
With Hearing Impairment > 800-749-7273 | |
This material may be used in conjunction | |
with the offering of shares of any Vanguard | |
fund only if preceded or accompanied by | |
the fund’s current prospectus. | |
All comparative mutual fund data are from Lipper Inc. or | |
Morningstar, Inc., unless otherwise noted. | |
You can obtain a free copy of Vanguard’s proxy voting | |
guidelines by visiting vanguard.com/proxyreporting or by | |
calling Vanguard at 800-662-2739. The guidelines are | |
also available from the SEC’s website, sec.gov. In | |
addition, you may obtain a free report on how your fund | |
voted the proxies for securities it owned during the 12 | |
months ended June 30. To get the report, visit either | |
vanguard.com/proxyreporting or sec.gov. | |
You can review and copy information about your fund at | |
the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. To | |
find out more about this public service, call the SEC at | |
202-551-8090. Information about your fund is also | |
available on the SEC’s website, and you can receive | |
copies of this information, for a fee, by sending a | |
request in either of two ways: via e-mail addressed to | |
publicinfo@sec.gov or via regular mail addressed to the | |
Public Reference Section, Securities and Exchange | |
Commission, Washington, DC 20549-1520. | |
© 2011 The Vanguard Group, Inc. | |
All rights reserved. | |
Vanguard Marketing Corporation, Distributor. | |
Q222 062011 |
Vanguard Windsor™ II Fund |
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2011 |
> For the fiscal half-year ended April 30, 2011, Vanguard Windsor II Fund returned nearly 17%, a bit below the result of its benchmark index and just ahead of the average return of large-capitalization value funds.
> More than half of the fund’s gain for the period came from the energy, financial, and industrial sectors.
> The subpar performance of some tech stocks weighed on the fund’s performance compared with that of its benchmark index.
Contents | |
Your Fund’s Total Returns. | 1 |
Chairman’s Letter. | 2 |
Advisors’ Report. | 6 |
Fund Profile. | 11 |
Performance Summary. | 12 |
Financial Statements. | 13 |
About Your Fund’s Expenses. | 27 |
Trustees Approve Advisory Arrangements. | 29 |
Glossary. | 31 |
Please note: The opinions expressed in this report are just that—informed opinions. They should not be considered promises or advice. Also, please keep in mind that the information and opinions cover the period through the date on the front of this report. Of course, the risks of investing in your fund are spelled out in the prospectus.
See the Glossary for definitions of investment terms used in this report.
Cover photograph: Jean Maher.
Your Fund’s Total Returns
Six Months Ended April 30, 2011 | |
Total | |
Returns | |
Vanguard Windsor II Fund | |
Investor Shares | 16.90% |
Admiral™ Shares | 16.91 |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.29 |
Large-Cap Value Funds Average | 16.48 |
Large-Cap Value Funds Average: Derived from data provided by Lipper Inc. | |
Admiral Shares carry lower expenses and are available to investors who meet certain account-balance requirements. |
Your Fund’s Performance at a Glance | ||||
October 31, 2010 , Through April 30, 2011 | ||||
Distributions Per Share | ||||
Starting | Ending | Income | Capital | |
Share Price | Share Price | Dividends | Gains | |
Vanguard Windsor II Fund | ||||
Investor Shares | $24.37 | $28.22 | $0.244 | $0.000 |
Admiral Shares | 43.26 | 50.09 | 0.443 | 0.000 |
1
Chairman’s Letter
Dear Shareholder,
U.S. equity markets posted strong returns despite a few jitters in reaction to political turmoil and natural disasters overseas. For the six months ended April 30, 2011, Vanguard Windsor II Fund returned almost 17%, a bit below the return of its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The fund’s return was slightly ahead of the average return of competing large-cap value funds.
Much of Windsor II’s gains for the six months came from its holdings in the energy, financial, and industrial sectors.
The fund’s performance relative to its benchmark index was largely influenced by its outsized holdings in information technology. For many years, the fund’s advisors have focused on blue chip tech stocks because they have considered them financially sound and attractively priced. During the past six months, however, the advisors’ large stake in IT was out of step with market trends.
Please note that on May 11, Vanguard lowered the minimum investment requirement for the Investor Shares of most Vanguard funds, including Windsor II, to $3,000. This change reflects our efforts to simplify our approach to offering Investor Shares and to increase the accessibility of Vanguard funds.
2
Strong returns around the globe
The headlines were dominated by political upheaval, natural and nuclear disaster, and economic distress, but global stock markets produced outstanding returns for the six months ended April 30. The broad U.S. stock market returned more than 17%. Although rising food and gasoline prices put pressure on consumer budgets, corporate earnings growth remained strong, and the pace of new job creation bounced back from extremely depressed levels.
For U.S.-based investors, international stock markets produced a smaller but still robust six-month return of more than 12%. Almost half of this return reflected exchange-rate gains produced largely by strength in the euro and currencies in emerging economies.
As the economy found its footing, rates edged higher
Rising longer-term interest rates put pressure on bond prices, which led to modest bond market returns for the six-month period. The broad taxable U.S. bond market returned about 0%. The broad municipal market returned –1.68%. The rise in rates reflected both confidence that the economic recovery would prove self-sustaining and thus nudge rates higher, and anxiety that higher rates would be necessary to provide some protection from inflation. Even so, inflation expectations remained subdued, as measured by the difference between the yields of inflation-protected and nominal U.S. Treasury bonds.
Market Barometer | |||
Total Returns | |||
Periods Ended April 30, 2011 | |||
Six | One | Five Years | |
Months | Year | (Annualized) | |
Stocks | |||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-caps) | 17.12% | 18.02% | 3.30% |
Russell 2000 Index (Small-caps) | 23.73 | 22.20 | 3.89 |
Dow Jones U.S. Total Stock Market Index | 17.28 | 18.40 | 3.65 |
MSCI All Country World Index ex USA (International) | 12.44 | 19.73 | 3.55 |
Bonds | |||
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (Broad | |||
taxable market) | 0.02% | 5.36% | 6.33% |
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index (Broad | |||
tax-exempt market) | -1.68 | 2.20 | 4.52 |
Citigroup Three-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index | 0.06 | 0.15 | 2.02 |
CPI | |||
Consumer Price Index | 2.83% | 3.16% | 2.22% |
3
The return on short-term money market instruments such as the 3-month U.S. Treasury bill remained near 0%, consistent with the Federal Reserve Board’s target for short-term rates.
The fund’s IT holdings restrained relative performance
Windsor II’s fiscal six-month performance was supported by signs of a strengthening U.S. economy, improved corporate earnings, and higher commodity prices.
Each of the fund’s ten sectors posted positive returns, with eight recording double-digit gains for the period. Energy, financials, and industrials contributed most.
Energy stocks surged along with crude oil prices following political upheavals in the Middle East and North Africa in January. Increased demand for energy, especially from growing emerging markets, also kept prices high. The fund’s integrated oil and gas stocks, including top-ten holdings ConocoPhillips (34%) and Occidental Petroleum (47%), were among the sector’s best performers.
Financials, the fund’s largest sector holding at about 20% of assets, on average, contributed a similar amount to its six-month result. Credit card companies, commercial banks, and diversified financial services boosted returns. Capital One (47%), the bank and credit card lender,
Expense Ratios | |||
Your Fund Compared With Its Peer Group | |||
Investor | Admiral | Peer Group | |
Shares | Shares | Average | |
Windsor II Fund | 0.35% | 0.27% | 1.27% |
The fund expense ratios shown are from the prospectus dated February 24, 2011, and represent estimated costs for the current fiscal year. For the six months ended April 30, 2011, the fund’s annualized expense ratios were 0.35% for Investor Shares and 0.27% for Admiral Shares. The peer-group expense ratio is derived from data provided by Lipper Inc. and captures information through year-end 2010.
Peer group: Large-Cap Value Funds.
4
was a leading contributor as improvements in the job market and credit trends helped curb credit card defaults.
Industrials also were noteworthy performers. Manufacturers such as Honeywell (32%) benefited from a general pickup in business investment and increased purchases from refiners and other energy-related companies.
Compared with the benchmark index, the fund’s performance was held back by its 15% stake—three times that of the index—and subpar stock selection in information technology. While some segments of the tech sector have done well thanks to consumer enthusiasm for breakthrough products, including smartphones and tablets, others have struggled to keep up. The fund held several companies in the latter camp, including Nokia (–14%) and Microsoft (–2%). The benchmark index did not include Nokia and had significantly less exposure to Microsoft.
Tune out the noise, focus on the long term
The stock market has defied the gloomy mood that dominated the headlines over the past six months. Its strong finish in April is encouraging, considering some of the difficulties encountered during the period.
There will always be unexpected events, such as the recent unrest in the Middle East and North Africa and the tragedy in Japan, that result in periodic jolts to stock markets worldwide. As tempting as it may be, we should not let such events influence the way we invest. While we are concerned for the people and countries involved, we are probably best served as investors by remaining focused on our long-term investment goals.
The key to maintaining this focus is to build a well-balanced, diversified portfolio that includes a mix of stocks, bonds, and short-term investments appropriate for your time horizon, financial objectives, and risk tolerance.
Vanguard Windsor II Fund, with its large-cap, value-oriented stocks, experienced advisors, and low costs, can play an important role as part of such a balanced portfolio.
Thank you for entrusting your assets to Vanguard.
Sincerely,
F. William McNabb III
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
May 11, 2011
5
Advisors’ Report
For the six months ended April 30, 2011, Vanguard Windsor II Fund returned nearly 17%. Your fund is managed by six independent advisors, a strategy that enhances its diversification by providing exposure to distinct, yet complementary, investment approaches. It’s not uncommon for different advisors to have different views about individual securities or the broader investment environment.
The table below lists the advisors, the amount and percentage of fund assets each manages, and brief descriptions of their investment strategies. The advisors have provided the following assessment of the investment environment during the past six months and the notable successes and shortfalls in their portfolios. These comments were prepared on May 17, 2011.
Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investment Advisors | |||
Fund Assets Managed | |||
Investment Advisor | % | $ Million | Investment Strategy |
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & | 61 | 23,182 | Conducts fundamental research on individual stocks |
Strauss, LLC | exhibiting traditional value characteristics: | ||
price/earnings and price/book ratios below the broad | |||
market average and dividend yields above the broad | |||
market average. | |||
Lazard Asset Management LLC | 18 | 6,940 | Employs a relative-value approach that seeks a |
combination of attractive valuation and high financial | |||
productivity. The process is research-driven, relying | |||
upon bottom-up stock analysis performed by the firm’s | |||
global sector analysts. | |||
Sanders Capital, LLC | 9 | 3,379 | Employs a traditional, bottom-up, fundamental research |
approach to identifying securities that are undervalued | |||
relative to their expected total return. | |||
Hotchkis and Wiley Capital | 6 | 2,277 | Uses a disciplined investment approach, focusing on |
Management, LLC | such investment parameters as a company’s tangible | ||
assets, sustainable cash flow, and potential for | |||
improving business performance. | |||
Armstrong Shaw Associates Inc. | 4 | 1,704 | Uses a bottom-up approach, employing fundamental |
and qualitative criteria to identify individual companies | |||
for potential investment. | |||
Vanguard Quantitative Equity | 0 | 141 | Employs a quantitative fundamental management |
Group | approach, using models that assess valuation, market | ||
sentiment, earnings quality and growth, and | |||
management decisions of companies versus their | |||
peers. | |||
Cash Investments | 2 | 727 | These short-term reserves are invested by Vanguard in |
equity index products to simulate investment in stocks. | |||
Each advisor may also maintain a modest cash | |||
position. |
6
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC
Portfolio Manager:
James P. Barrow, Executive Director
Investment environment: Equities produced attractive returns for the first half of the fiscal year, with most benchmarks and the Windsor II Fund returning around 17%. The economy is improving, and earnings are robust and should soon be near record levels. Interest rates are low and inflation is modest, except for commodities. It is the “except for” in the previous statement that is a problem, as it could well signify the end of a speculative bubble in commodities.
Successes: We believe that the consumer credit cycle is improving, and our overweighting in companies that could benefit from this, such as Capital One Financial and SLM Corp., added nicely to performance.
Shortfalls: Our major detractor was the information technology sector. The cannibalization of the PC market by tablet computers affects many of our current holdings, including Hewlett-Packard, Microsoft, and Intel. While we do expect significant growth in tablets, we believe this issue is either overly discounted in the valuations or a temporary concern for these businesses. In addition, technology spending is still being constrained or deferred by industrial America, and this is hurting the multiples of most of the large technology companies, such as Xerox, in our portfolio.
Lazard Asset Management LLC
Portfolio Managers:
Andrew Lacey, Deputy Chairman
Christopher Blake, Managing Director
Investment environment: The U.S. stock market rose during the last six months despite global shocks, including turmoil in the Middle East and North Africa, the earthquake and nuclear crisis in Japan, and ongoing sovereign debt problems in Europe. U.S. companies benefited from strong earnings, share repurchases, and merger activity. In November, the Federal Reserve Board announced a second round of quantitative easing in which it would purchase approximately $600 billion of Treasuries. However, concerns about the economy remain. Standard & Poor’s revised the U.S.’s sovereign credit rating outlook to negative. And first-quarter GDP disappointed as the annualized growth rate declined.
Successes: Our portfolio benefited from stock selection in the consumer discretionary sector. Top contributors were Comcast and Big Lots. Stock selection in energy also helped returns. Standouts here included ConocoPhillips and Valero Energy.
7
Shortfalls: Stock selection in the information technology sector restrained performance. Top detractors included AOL and Cisco. Stock selection and an underweight position in industrials also hurt returns, as Corrections Corp. of America and Raytheon underperformed.
Sanders Capital, LLC
Portfolio Managers:
Lewis A. Sanders, CFA
Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chief Investment Officer
John P. Mahedy, CPA
Director of Research and Co-Chief Investment Officer
Investment environment: Accelerating inflation is taking center stage. Its emergence will eventually prompt a reshaping of monetary policy in the direction of tighter credit. In this setting, bond returns will likely prove disappointing and we remain skeptical that inflation hedges in precious metals will prove effective once short-term interest rates rise. The best returns are expected to come from the equities of companies with strong balance sheets and pricing power.
Successes and shortfalls: Consistent with this view, our largest investments are in oil and gas, health care, and information technology. The first two of these sectors have performed well so far in 2011 and remain highly attractive. Our technology holdings have been mixed, with strong returns for IBM but very weak results for Microsoft. We continue to believe that affordable and highly mobile computing devices, coupled with cloud-based information and entertainment services, will stimulate demand. Our strategy is focused on companies that should benefit from this trend, many of which are valued at very attractive levels.
Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC
Portfolio Managers:
George H. Davis, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
Sheldon J. Lieberman, Principal
Investment environment: U.S. equity markets performed favorably during the period despite multiple conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa and the tragic earthquake in Japan. These incidents have taken a tremendous human toll, but investors do not foresee them derailing the U.S. economic recovery. Improved profitability and strengthened corporate balance sheets continued to spark the market’s positive movement. Three out of four companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index beat consensus earnings expectations for the fourth quarter of 2010 despite upward revisions, and first-quarter earnings have also started strong. The S&P 500 Index returned more than 16% and the Russell 1000 Value Index returned more than 17%. Energy was the big winner as oil prices rose.
8
Successes: Stock selection in the financial and materials sectors helped our performance. Large contributors included Capital One, Celanese, PPG, and oil giants ConocoPhillips and Royal Dutch Shell.
Shortfalls: Stock selection in technology hurt performance, along with an underweight position in energy. Large detractors included Hewlett-Packard and Microsoft.
Armstrong Shaw Associates Inc.
Portfolio Manager:
Jeffrey M. Shaw, Chairman and Chief Investment Officer
Investment environment: Despite challenging events and rising energy and commodity prices, equities rallied sharply over the past six months. The market’s resilience underscored the strength of the global economic recovery and improved corporate fundamentals. We believe the economy will continue to grow, albeit at a more modest pace, and see further evidence of a recovery driven by corporate profits. The portfolio’s overweight position in energy and industrial stocks reflects our belief that many of our holdings in these sectors will benefit from the ongoing global rebound, particularly in emerging markets.
Successes: The portfolio’s performance was driven by a large overweight position in energy, the best-performing sector, and meaningful underweights in utilities and consumer staples, the two worst-performing sectors. Our top sector was energy, followed by consumer discretionary and industrials. Halliburton, our top performer, rallied on higher oil prices, optimism that North American onshore strength will continue, and signs of accelerating international activity. Stock selection in health care also helped performance, led by Covidien and UnitedHealth Group.
Shortfalls: On the downside, an overweight position and weak relative returns in technology detracted. Cisco fell after providing disappointing guidance for product revenue and margins. In contrast, Oracle and IBM rose on strong fundamental results.
Vanguard Quantitative Equity Group
Portfolio Manager:
James D. Troyer, CFA, Principal
Investment environment: In the first half of the fiscal year, strong corporate earnings and job growth helped the U.S. equity market continue its rise from the financial crisis lows of two years ago despite various global economic and political concerns.
Successes: While our overall portfolio performance is affected by the macroeconomic factors described above, our quantitative approach to investing focuses on a diversified mix of specific stock fundamentals. For the period, our stock selection model benefited the most
9
from our valuation signal, which measures the price we pay for earnings and cash flows, as well as our management decisions signal, which looks at the actions taken by company management.
At the individual stock level, the largest contributions came from overweight positions in Limited Brands (55%) and Cimarex Energy (44%). Relative to its benchmark, our portfolio benefited from underweighting or avoiding poor-performing stocks such as Abbott Laboratories (–8%) and Xerox (–13%).
Shortfalls: Unfortunately, we are not able to avoid all laggards. Overweight positions in Motorola Mobility (–21%) and United Continental Holdings (–21%) directly lowered performance. And underweight positions in companies not positively identified by our model, including Covidien (41%) and Chesapeake Energy (56%), hurt our performance relative to the benchmark.
10
Windsor II Fund
Fund Profile
As of April 30, 2011
Share-Class Characteristics | ||
Investor | Admiral | |
Shares | Shares | |
Ticker Symbol | VWNFX | VWNAX |
Expense Ratio1 | 0.35% | 0.27% |
30-Day SEC Yield | 2.00% | 2.08% |
Portfolio Characteristics | |||
Russell | DJ | ||
1000 | U.S. Total | ||
Value | Market | ||
Fund | Index | Index | |
Number of Stocks | 259 | 664 | 3,817 |
Median Market Cap $49.3B | $38.3B | $31.8B | |
Price/Earnings Ratio | 14.5x | 16.1x | 17.7x |
Price/Book Ratio | 2.0x | 1.7x | 2.4x |
Return on Equity | 18.9% | 14.3% | 18.9% |
Earnings Growth Rate | 1.1% | 0.8% | 5.9% |
Dividend Yield | 2.4% | 2.2% | 1.7% |
Foreign Holdings | 6.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Turnover Rate | |||
(Annualized) | 21% | — | — |
Short-Term Reserves | 1.5% | — | — |
Sector Diversification (% of equity exposure) | |||
Russell | DJ | ||
1000 | U.S. Total | ||
Value | Market | ||
Fund | Index | Index | |
Consumer | |||
Discretionary | 7.6% | 8.0% | 11.8% |
Consumer Staples | 11.4 | 9.6 | 9.4 |
Energy | 13.2 | 13.6 | 11.6 |
Financials | 19.2 | 26.3 | 15.8 |
Health Care | 11.8 | 12.9 | 11.1 |
Industrials | 12.8 | 9.3 | 11.6 |
Information | |||
Technology | 14.8 | 5.4 | 18.5 |
Materials | 2.7 | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Telecommunication | |||
Services | 2.4 | 5.0 | 2.6 |
Utilities | 4.1 | 6.7 | 3.1 |
Volatility Measures | ||
Russell | DJ | |
1000 | U.S. Total | |
Value | Market | |
Index | Index | |
R-Squared | 0.98 | 0.98 |
Beta | 0.96 | 0.99 |
These measures show the degree and timing of the fund’s fluctuations compared with the indexes over 36 months.
Ten Largest Holdings (% of total net assets) | ||
ConocoPhillips | Integrated Oil & | |
Gas | 3.6% | |
International Business | IT Consulting & | |
Machines Corp. | Other Services | 3.3 |
Pfizer Inc. | Pharmaceuticals | 3.1 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | Diversified Financial | |
Services | 2.8 | |
Microsoft Corp. | Systems Software | 2.3 |
Philip Morris | ||
International Inc. | Tobacco | 2.3 |
Wells Fargo & Co. | Diversified Banks | 2.3 |
Occidental Petroleum | Integrated Oil & | |
Corp. | Gas | 2.3 |
Spectra Energy Corp. | Oil & Gas Storage & | |
Transportation | 2.1 | |
Intel Corp. | Semiconductors | 2.0 |
Top Ten | 26.1% |
The holdings listed exclude any temporary cash investments and equity index products.
Investment Focus
1 The expense ratios shown are from the prospectus dated February 24, 2011, and represent estimated costs for the current fiscal year. For the six months ended April 30, 2011, the annualized expense ratios were 0.35% for Investor Shares and 0.27% for Admiral Shares.
11
Windsor II Fund
Performance Summary
All of the returns in this report represent past performance, which is not a guarantee of future results that may be achieved by the fund. (Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data cited. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit our website at vanguard.com/performance.) Note, too, that both investment returns and principal value can fluctuate widely, so an investor’s shares, when sold, could be worth more or less than their original cost. The returns shown do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or on the sale of fund shares.
Fiscal-Year Total Returns (%): October 31, 2000, Through April 30, 2011
Average Annual Total Returns: Periods Ended March 31, 2011
This table presents returns through the latest calendar quarter—rather than through the end of the fiscal period.
Securities and Exchange Commission rules require that we provide this information.
Inception | One | Five | Ten | |
Date | Year | Years | Years | |
Investor Shares | 6/24/1985 | 11.24% | 2.03% | 4.53% |
Admiral Shares | 5/14/2001 | 11.29 | 2.13 | 4.031 |
1 Return since inception. |
See Financial Highlights for dividend and capital gains information.
12
Windsor II Fund
Financial Statements (unaudited)
Statement of Net Assets
As of April 30, 2011
The fund reports a complete list of its holdings in regulatory filings four times in each fiscal year, at the quarter-ends. For the second and fourth fiscal quarters, the lists appear in the fund’s semiannual and annual reports to shareholders. For the first and third fiscal quarters, the fund files the lists with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form N-Q. Shareholders can look up the fund’s Forms N-Q on the SEC’s website at sec.gov. Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room (see the back cover of this report for further information).
Market | |||
Value | |||
Shares | ($000) | ||
Common Stocks (97.7%)1 | |||
Consumer Discretionary (7.3%) | |||
Comcast Corp. Class A | |||
Special Shares | 15,230,677 | 373,913 | |
CBS Corp. Class B | 14,448,674 | 364,396 | |
2 | Wyndham Worldwide | ||
Corp. | 9,905,732 | 342,837 | |
Carnival Corp. | 7,733,286 | 294,406 | |
2 | Service Corp. | ||
International | 21,527,536 | 253,379 | |
Gap Inc. | 5,693,948 | 132,327 | |
* | AutoZone Inc. | 467,403 | 131,985 |
Omnicom Group Inc. | 2,299,300 | 113,103 | |
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 4,220,910 | 110,799 | |
Genuine Parts Co. | 1,392,448 | 74,774 | |
Lear Corp. | 1,421,700 | 72,706 | |
Hyundai Motor Co. | 293,600 | 67,719 | |
Newell Rubbermaid Inc. | 3,544,300 | 67,554 | |
JC Penney Co. Inc. | 1,322,000 | 50,831 | |
Stanley Black & Decker | |||
Inc. | 650,800 | 47,281 | |
Darden Restaurants Inc. | 989,300 | 46,467 | |
* | Sirius XM Radio Inc. | 20,492,900 | 40,781 |
Viacom Inc. Class B | 775,900 | 39,695 | |
* | Apollo Group Inc. Class A | 838,300 | 33,557 |
Home Depot Inc. | 778,074 | 28,898 | |
Magna International Inc. | 496,600 | 25,451 | |
Time Warner Cable Inc. | 316,800 | 24,752 | |
Johnson Controls Inc. | 520,700 | 21,349 | |
* | General Motors Co. | 627,200 | 20,127 |
Interpublic Group of Cos. | |||
Inc. | 867,000 | 10,187 | |
Comcast Corp. Class A | 56,400 | 1,480 | |
Limited Brands Inc. | 25,900 | 1,066 | |
* | TRW Automotive Holdings | ||
Corp. | 12,800 | 730 | |
* | Royal Caribbean Cruises | ||
Ltd. | 11,680 | 465 | |
VF Corp. | 4,400 | 442 |
Market | |||
Value | |||
Shares | ($000) | ||
Brinker International Inc. | 16,650 | 401 | |
Walt Disney Co. | 7,912 | 341 | |
Macy’s Inc. | 13,950 | 333 | |
Time Warner Inc. | 3,799 | 144 | |
Foot Locker Inc. | 4,800 | 103 | |
Fortune Brands Inc. | 900 | 59 | |
* | Liberty Media | ||
Corp. - Interactive | 1,300 | 23 | |
2,794,861 | |||
Consumer Staples (11.0%) | |||
Philip Morris International | |||
Inc. | 12,690,953 | 881,260 | |
Imperial Tobacco Group | |||
plc ADR | 10,348,625 | 732,113 | |
Diageo plc ADR | 7,526,520 | 612,433 | |
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. | 7,036,600 | 386,872 | |
Altria Group Inc. | 12,460,907 | 334,451 | |
CVS Caremark Corp. | 8,891,524 | 322,229 | |
Walgreen Co. | 5,997,539 | 256,215 | |
Sysco Corp. | 6,268,119 | 181,211 | |
Molson Coors Brewing | |||
Co. Class B | 2,941,300 | 143,388 | |
Kraft Foods Inc. | 2,346,461 | 78,794 | |
Procter & Gamble Co. | 1,134,820 | 73,650 | |
General Mills Inc. | 1,906,100 | 73,537 | |
* | Energizer Holdings Inc. | 775,800 | 58,596 |
Avon Products Inc. | 1,198,495 | 35,212 | |
PepsiCo Inc. | 351,100 | 24,187 | |
Safeway Inc. | 872,700 | 21,215 | |
Kimberly-Clark Corp. | 172,400 | 11,389 | |
Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. | 32,400 | 921 | |
Sara Lee Corp. | 47,800 | 918 | |
Hormel Foods Corp. | 26,600 | 782 | |
Dr Pepper Snapple Group | |||
Inc. | 17,900 | 702 | |
* | Smithfield Foods Inc. | 22,650 | 534 |
Reynolds American Inc. | 12,700 | 471 | |
Coca-Cola Co. | 4,100 | 277 | |
4,231,357 |
13
Windsor II Fund
Market | |||
Value | |||
Shares | ($000) | ||
Energy (12.7%) | |||
ConocoPhillips | 17,650,289 | 1,393,137 | |
Occidental Petroleum | |||
Corp. | 7,571,257 | 865,319 | |
Spectra Energy Corp. | 27,756,611 | 806,052 | |
Chevron Corp. | 2,605,649 | 285,162 | |
Apache Corp. | 1,891,191 | 252,228 | |
Royal Dutch Shell | |||
plc ADR | 2,211,390 | 173,285 | |
BP plc ADR | 2,948,170 | 136,029 | |
Noble Corp. | 3,121,878 | 134,272 | |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | 1,412,482 | 124,298 | |
Devon Energy Corp. | 1,248,660 | 113,628 | |
Halliburton Co. | 1,964,340 | 99,160 | |
Consol Energy Inc. | 1,738,420 | 94,031 | |
EQT Corp. | 1,611,100 | 84,760 | |
El Paso Corp. | 3,081,450 | 59,811 | |
Marathon Oil Corp. | 1,040,300 | 56,218 | |
* | Cameron International | ||
Corp. | 963,545 | 50,798 | |
* | Transocean Ltd. | 640,797 | 46,618 |
Valero Energy Corp. | 1,154,800 | 32,681 | |
Total SA ADR | 470,400 | 30,214 | |
Gazprom OAO ADR | 1,553,600 | 26,324 | |
* | Cobalt International | ||
Energy Inc. | 1,003,700 | 14,052 | |
Cimarex Energy Co. | 8,230 | 910 | |
National Oilwell Varco Inc. | 1,100 | 84 | |
4,879,071 | |||
Exchange-Traded Funds (1.0%) | |||
3 | Vanguard Total Stock | ||
Market ETF | 3,197,800 | 226,085 | |
^,3 | Vanguard Value ETF | 2,511,200 | 146,654 |
372,739 | |||
Financials (18.8%) | |||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 23,756,309 | 1,084,000 | |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 30,206,973 | 879,325 | |
PNC Financial Services | |||
Group Inc. | 11,670,981 | 727,569 | |
American Express Co. | 14,162,850 | 695,113 | |
Bank of America Corp. | 47,940,755 | 588,712 | |
Capital One Financial | |||
Corp. | 9,527,638 | 521,448 | |
* | Citigroup Inc. | 97,536,602 | 447,693 |
State Street Corp. | 8,827,700 | 410,929 | |
XL Group plc Class A | 12,601,532 | 307,729 | |
* | SLM Corp. | 18,135,452 | 300,867 |
MetLife Inc. | 3,841,242 | 179,732 | |
Travelers Cos. Inc. | 2,426,348 | 153,539 | |
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. | 858,319 | 129,615 | |
Ameriprise Financial Inc. | 1,700,300 | 105,521 | |
Morgan Stanley | 3,588,785 | 93,847 | |
Prudential Financial Inc. | 1,322,000 | 83,841 | |
Allstate Corp. | 2,145,300 | 72,597 |
Market | |||
Value | |||
Shares | ($000) | ||
Lincoln National Corp. | 2,050,261 | 64,030 | |
Barclays plc | 12,249,700 | 58,236 | |
BB&T Corp. | 1,706,500 | 45,939 | |
ACE Ltd. | 677,350 | 45,552 | |
Unum Group | 1,507,500 | 39,919 | |
Chubb Corp. | 563,274 | 36,720 | |
PartnerRe Ltd. | 419,100 | 33,679 | |
* | Genworth Financial Inc. | ||
Class A | 2,564,900 | 31,266 | |
SunTrust Banks Inc. | 744,600 | 20,990 | |
KeyCorp | 1,760,982 | 15,268 | |
Hartford Financial | |||
Services Group Inc. | 446,000 | 12,921 | |
US Bancorp | 62,449 | 1,612 | |
Leucadia National Corp. | 22,300 | 862 | |
Torchmark Corp. | 12,000 | 803 | |
American Financial Group | |||
Inc. | 20,700 | 740 | |
* | NASDAQ OMX Group Inc. | 26,700 | 723 |
Vornado Realty Trust | 7,300 | 706 | |
HCP Inc. | 16,700 | 662 | |
Simon Property Group Inc. | 5,300 | 607 | |
Equity Residential | 9,700 | 579 | |
Ventas Inc. | 9,800 | 548 | |
* | Arch Capital Group Ltd. | 5,200 | 541 |
Kimco Realty Corp. | 26,100 | 510 | |
New York Community | |||
Bancorp Inc. | 29,839 | 495 | |
Axis Capital Holdings Ltd. | 13,600 | 481 | |
Rayonier Inc. | 7,100 | 471 | |
RenaissanceRe Holdings | |||
Ltd. | 6,100 | 429 | |
Aflac Inc. | 6,100 | 343 | |
Loews Corp. | 7,600 | 336 | |
* | Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | ||
Class B | 3,300 | 275 | |
NYSE Euronext | 5,100 | 204 | |
M&T Bank Corp. | 2,300 | 203 | |
Raymond James Financial | |||
Inc. | 4,100 | 154 | |
Validus Holdings Ltd. | 3,800 | 124 | |
Assurant Inc. | 2,200 | 87 | |
Bank of New York Mellon | |||
Corp. | 2,733 | 79 | |
Fifth Third Bancorp | 1,500 | 20 | |
7,199,191 | |||
Health Care (11.4%) | |||
Pfizer Inc. | 57,284,768 | 1,200,689 | |
Baxter International Inc. | 12,662,468 | 720,494 | |
Johnson & Johnson | 8,825,800 | 580,032 | |
WellPoint Inc. | 5,888,699 | 452,193 | |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 13,696,114 | 384,861 | |
Merck & Co. Inc. | 6,129,629 | 220,360 | |
Abbott Laboratories | 2,753,950 | 143,315 | |
Medtronic Inc. | 3,267,100 | 136,401 |
14
Windsor II Fund
Market | |||
Value | |||
Shares | ($000) | ||
UnitedHealth Group Inc. | 2,550,451 | 125,559 | |
* | Amgen Inc. | 1,987,540 | 112,992 |
Covidien plc | 1,429,290 | 79,597 | |
* | Gilead Sciences Inc. | 2,038,700 | 79,183 |
Eli Lilly & Co. | 1,313,800 | 48,624 | |
Novartis AG ADR | 805,300 | 47,650 | |
* | Thermo Fisher Scientific | ||
Inc. | 700,030 | 41,995 | |
CIGNA Corp. | 21,300 | 997 | |
AmerisourceBergen Corp. | |||
Class A | 18,490 | 751 | |
* | Humana Inc. | 9,100 | 693 |
Aetna Inc. | 15,600 | 645 | |
Cardinal Health Inc. | 5,900 | 258 | |
* | Charles River Laboratories | ||
International Inc. | 5,850 | 247 | |
4,377,536 | |||
Industrials (12.4%) | |||
Raytheon Co. | 15,500,461 | 752,547 | |
2 | Cooper Industries plc | 11,105,488 | 732,407 |
Honeywell International | |||
Inc. | 10,983,861 | 672,542 | |
General Electric Co. | 32,839,407 | 671,566 | |
ITT Corp. | 8,813,102 | 509,309 | |
Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 8,237,230 | 481,137 | |
Lockheed Martin Corp. | 1,493,600 | 118,368 | |
* | Corrections Corp. of | ||
America | 3,675,100 | 91,473 | |
Norfolk Southern Corp. | 1,224,700 | 91,461 | |
Dover Corp. | 1,031,800 | 70,204 | |
Northrop Grumman Corp. | 1,031,276 | 65,599 | |
CSX Corp. | 820,820 | 64,590 | |
General Dynamics Corp. | 864,000 | 62,916 | |
United Technologies Corp. 630,570 | 56,486 | ||
Ingersoll-Rand plc | 1,086,320 | 54,859 | |
Emerson Electric Co. | 872,800 | 53,031 | |
United Parcel Service Inc. | |||
Class B | 621,160 | 46,568 | |
FedEx Corp. | 330,500 | 31,619 | |
PACCAR Inc. | 538,200 | 28,584 | |
Rockwell Collins Inc. | 374,210 | 23,613 | |
Tyco International Ltd. | 425,375 | 20,733 | |
Embraer SA ADR | 586,200 | 19,040 | |
Cummins Inc. | 143,600 | 17,258 | |
Boeing Co. | 139,900 | 11,161 | |
* | Huntington Ingalls | ||
Industries Inc. | 92,550 | 3,702 | |
Eaton Corp. | 19,800 | 1,060 | |
Parker Hannifin Corp. | 9,000 | 849 | |
Timken Co. | 15,000 | 846 | |
Rockwell Automation Inc. | 9,515 | 829 |
Market | |||
Value | |||
Shares | ($000) | ||
KBR Inc. | 19,900 | 764 | |
Avery Dennison Corp. | 16,700 | 697 | |
3M Co. | 6,626 | 644 | |
* | United Continental | ||
Holdings Inc. | 12,700 | 290 | |
4,756,752 | |||
Information Technology (14.3%) | |||
International Business | |||
Machines Corp. | 7,419,620 | 1,265,639 | |
Microsoft Corp. | 34,023,540 | 885,293 | |
Intel Corp. | 33,607,890 | 779,367 | |
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 16,894,517 | 682,032 | |
Oracle Corp. | 6,771,240 | 244,103 | |
Xerox Corp. | 23,681,100 | 238,942 | |
Applied Materials Inc. | 14,142,500 | 221,896 | |
^ | Nokia Oyj ADR | 21,263,473 | 196,262 |
Cisco Systems Inc. | 6,460,150 | 113,440 | |
Corning Inc. | 4,673,500 | 97,863 | |
Texas Instruments Inc. | 2,587,700 | 91,941 | |
* | Google Inc. Class A | 144,180 | 78,448 |
* | eBay Inc. | 2,159,957 | 74,303 |
Samsung Electronics Co. | |||
Ltd. | 79,250 | 66,196 | |
* | EMC Corp. | 2,293,700 | 65,003 |
* | Symantec Corp. | 3,276,400 | 64,381 |
Mastercard Inc. Class A | 233,300 | 64,365 | |
CA Inc. | 2,451,228 | 60,276 | |
Lender Processing | |||
Services Inc. | 2,040,600 | 60,055 | |
TE Connectivity Ltd. | 1,084,575 | 38,882 | |
* | Western Digital Corp. | 957,700 | 38,117 |
* | AOL Inc. | 1,630,000 | 33,219 |
* | Dell Inc. | 1,587,900 | 24,628 |
* | Motorola Solutions Inc. | 19,845 | 911 |
* | IAC/InterActiveCorp | 23,000 | 831 |
* | Lam Research Corp. | 14,800 | 715 |
* | Motorola Mobility Holdings | ||
Inc. | 26,375 | 687 | |
* | Novellus Systems Inc. | 20,600 | 661 |
* | Electronic Arts Inc. | 7,300 | 147 |
* | Lexmark International Inc. | ||
Class A | 1,800 | 58 | |
5,488,661 | |||
Materials (2.6%) | |||
EI du Pont de Nemours | |||
& Co. | 7,298,538 | 414,484 | |
Ball Corp. | 3,826,491 | 142,767 | |
Nucor Corp. | 1,868,000 | 87,721 | |
Newmont Mining Corp. | 1,413,700 | 82,857 | |
Dow Chemical Co. | 1,878,900 | 77,016 | |
Monsanto Co. | 1,031,600 | 70,190 |
15
Windsor II Fund
Market | |||
Value• | |||
Shares | ($000) | ||
Praxair Inc. | 389,690 | 41,471 | |
Freeport-McMoRan | |||
Copper & Gold Inc. | 711,000 | 39,126 | |
Celanese Corp. Class A | 346,700 | 17,307 | |
PPG Industries Inc. | 126,300 | 11,957 | |
Walter Energy Inc. | 5,800 | 802 | |
Eastman Chemical Co. | 4,550 | 488 | |
986,186 | |||
Telecommunication Services (2.3%) | |||
Vodafone Group | |||
plc ADR | 13,673,600 | 398,175 | |
Verizon Communications | |||
Inc. | 6,386,509 | 241,282 | |
AT&T Inc. | 7,721,507 | 240,293 | |
* | MetroPCS | ||
Communications Inc. | 17,320 | 292 | |
CenturyLink Inc. | 4,875 | 199 | |
880,241 | |||
Utilities (3.9%) | |||
Dominion Resources Inc. | 11,870,214 | 551,015 | |
2 | CenterPoint Energy Inc. | 25,066,113 | 466,230 |
Entergy Corp. | 2,991,278 | 208,552 | |
Edison International | 2,215,800 | 87,015 | |
Exelon Corp. | 1,592,600 | 67,128 | |
Public Service Enterprise | |||
Group Inc. | 1,647,800 | 53,010 | |
Sempra Energy | 843,700 | 46,488 | |
PPL Corp. | 789,200 | 21,648 | |
Oneok Inc. | 13,300 | 930 | |
Northeast Utilities | 23,900 | 851 | |
CMS Energy Corp. | 38,800 | 768 | |
Ameren Corp. | 24,500 | 718 | |
Pinnacle West Capital | |||
Corp. | 15,100 | 655 | |
Integrys Energy Group Inc. | 12,300 | 644 | |
DTE Energy Co. | 12,500 | 632 | |
Duke Energy Corp. | 30,100 | 561 | |
UGI Corp. | 13,400 | 446 | |
Alliant Energy Corp. | 8,900 | 352 | |
NV Energy Inc. | 12,100 | 184 | |
Consolidated Edison Inc. | 1,600 | 83 | |
1,507,910 | |||
Total Common Stocks | |||
(Cost $29,825,716) | 37,474,505 |
Market | ||||
Value• | ||||
Shares | ($000 | |||
Temporary Cash Investments (3.1%)1 | ||||
Money Market Fund (2.9%) | ||||
4,5 | Vanguard Market | |||
Liquidity Fund, | ||||
0.179% | 1,126,344,775 | 1,126,345 | ||
Face | ||||
Amount | ||||
($000) | ||||
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations (0.2%) | ||||
6,7 | Fannie Mae Discount | |||
Notes, 0.150%, 6/1/11 | 100 | 100 | ||
6,7 | Federal Home Loan | |||
Bank Discount Notes, | ||||
0.130%, 5/20/11 | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||
6,7 | Freddie Mac Discount | |||
Notes, 0.180%, 5/2/11 | 35,000 | 35,000 | ||
6,7 | Freddie Mac Discount | |||
Notes, 0.110%, 8/10/11 | 25,000 | 24,989 | ||
65,089 | ||||
Total Temporary Cash Investments | ||||
(Cost $1,191,436) | 1,191,434 | |||
Total Investments (100.8%) | ||||
(Cost $31,017,152) | 38,665,939 | |||
Other Assets and Liabilities (-0.8%) | ||||
Other Assets | 144,185 | |||
Liabilities5 | (461,203) | |||
(317,018) | ||||
Net Assets (100%) | 38,348,921 | |||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | ||||
Assets | ||||
Investments in Securities, at Value | 38,665,939 | |||
Receivables for Investment | ||||
Securities Sold | 80,870 | |||
Receivables for Capital Shares Issued | 21,515 | |||
Other Assets | 41,800 | |||
Total Assets | 38,810,124 | |||
Liabilities | ||||
Security Lending Collateral Payable | ||||
to Brokers | 207,208 | |||
Payables for Investment Securities | ||||
Purchased | 127,818 | |||
Payables for Capital Shares Redeemed | 30,560 | |||
Other Liabilities | 95,617 | |||
Total Liabilities | 461,203 | |||
Net Assets | 38,348,921 |
16
Windsor II Fund
At April 30, 2011, net assets consisted of: | |
Amount | |
($000) | |
Paid-in Capital | 35,155,189 |
Undistributed Net Investment Income | 164,053 |
Accumulated Net Realized Losses | (4,632,110) |
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
Investment Securities | 7,648,787 |
Futures Contracts | 13,002 |
Net Assets | 38,348,921 |
Investor Shares—Net Assets | |
Applicable to 777,688,026 outstanding | |
$.001 par value shares of beneficial | |
interest (unlimited authorization) | 21,943,743 |
Net Asset Value Per Share— | |
Investor Shares | $28.22 |
Admiral Shares—Net Assets | |
Applicable to 327,511,770 outstanding | |
$.001 par value shares of beneficial | |
interest (unlimited authorization) | 16,405,178 |
Net Asset Value Per Share— | |
Admiral Shares | $50.09 |
See Note A in Notes to Financial Statements.
* Non-income-producing security.
^ Part of security position is on loan to broker-dealers. The total value of securities on loan is $191,515,000.
1 The fund invests a portion of its cash reserves in equity markets through the use of index futures contracts. After giving effect to futures investments, the fund’s effective common stock and temporary cash investment positions represent 98.7% and 2.1%, respectively, of net assets.
2 Considered an affiliated company of the fund as the fund owns more than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of such company.
3 Considered an affiliated company of the fund as the issuer is another member of The Vanguard Group.
4 Affiliated money market fund available only to Vanguard funds and certain trusts and accounts managed by Vanguard. Rate shown is the 7-day yield.
5 Includes $207,208,000 of collateral received for securities on loan.
6 The issuer operates under a congressional charter; its securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
7 Securities with a value of $64,389,000 have been segregated as initial margin for open futures contracts.
ADR—American Depositary Receipt.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
17
Windsor II Fund
Statement of Operations | |
Six Months Ended | |
April 30, 2011 | |
($000) | |
Investment Income | |
Income | |
Dividends1,2 | 404,274 |
Interest2 | 1,007 |
Security Lending | 175 |
Total Income | 405,456 |
Expenses | |
Investment Advisory Fees—Note B | |
Basic Fee | 26,840 |
Performance Adjustment | (2,782) |
The Vanguard Group—Note C | |
Management and Administrative—Investor Shares | 20,297 |
Management and Administrative—Admiral Shares | 8,973 |
Marketing and Distribution—Investor Shares | 2,313 |
Marketing and Distribution—Admiral Shares | 1,478 |
Custodian Fees | 198 |
Shareholders’ Reports—Investor Shares | 99 |
Shareholders’ Reports—Admiral Shares | 67 |
Trustees’ Fees and Expenses | 33 |
Total Expenses | 57,516 |
Expenses Paid Indirectly | (948) |
Net Expenses | 56,568 |
Net Investment Income | 348,888 |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | |
Investment Securities Sold2 | 751,478 |
Futures Contracts | 64,292 |
Foreign Currencies | (177) |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | 815,593 |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
Investment Securities | 4,474,163 |
Futures Contracts | 6,638 |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | 4,480,801 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 5,645,282 |
1 Dividends are net of foreign withholding taxes of $306,000.
2 Dividend income, interest income, and realized net gain (loss) from affiliated companies of the fund were $29,416,000, $940,000, and $51,930,000, respectively.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
18
Windsor II Fund
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | ||
Six Months Ended | Year Ended | |
April 30, | October 31, | |
2011 | 2010 | |
($000) | ($000) | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||
Operations | ||
Net Investment Income | 348,888 | 725,398 |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | 815,593 | (399,047) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | 4,480,801 | 3,508,044 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 5,645,282 | 3,834,395 |
Distributions | ||
Net Investment Income | ||
Investor Shares | (193,956) | (453,946) |
Admiral Shares | (147,080) | (282,936) |
Realized Capital Gain | ||
Investor Shares | — | — |
Admiral Shares | — | — |
Total Distributions | (341,036) | (736,882) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Investor Shares | (2,046,988) | (1,721,406) |
Admiral Shares | 789,795 | 170,368 |
Net Increase (Decrease) from Capital Share Transactions | (1,257,193) | (1,551,038) |
Total Increase (Decrease) | 4,047,053 | 1,546,475 |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of Period | 34,301,868 | 32,755,393 |
End of Period1 | 34,348,921 | 34,301,868 |
1 Net Assets—End of Period includes undistributed net investment income of $164,053,000 and $156,378,000. |
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
19
Windsor II Fund
Financial Highlights
Investor Shares | ||||||
Six Months | ||||||
Ended | ||||||
For a Share Outstanding | April 30, | Year Ended October 31, | ||||
Throughout Each Period | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $24.37 | $22.22 | $20.56 | $37.84 | $35.14 | $31.61 |
Investment Operations | ||||||
Net Investment Income | .252 | .495 | .580 | .777 | .803 | .760 |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||||||
on Investments | 3.842 | 2.151 | 1.750 | (13.804) | 4.145 | 4.368 |
Total from Investment Operations | 4.094 | 2.646 | 2.330 | (13.027) | 4.948 | 5.128 |
Distributions | ||||||
Dividends from Net Investment Income | (.244) | (.496) | (.670) | (.799) | (.790) | (.720) |
Distributions from Realized Capital Gains | — | — | — | (3.454) | (1.458) | (.878) |
Total Distributions | (.244) | (.496) | (.670) | (4.253) | (2.248) | (1.598) |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $28.22 | $24.37 | $22.22 | $20.56 | $37.84 | $35.14 |
Total Return1 | 16.90% | 12.05% | 11.96% | -38.02% | 14.62% | 16.85% |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (Millions) | $21,944 | $20,921 | $20,695 | $19,400 | $33,821 | $30,790 |
Ratio of Total Expenses to | ||||||
Average Net Assets2 | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.33% | 0.34% |
Ratio of Net Investment Income to | ||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.90% | 2.08% | 2.96% | 2.66% | 2.19% | 2.28% |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 21% | 29% | 41% | 37% | 51% | 34% |
The expense ratio, net income ratio, and turnover rate for the current period have been annualized.
1 Total returns do not include account service fees that may have applied in the periods shown. Fund prospectuses provide information about any applicable account service fees.
2 Includes performance-based investment advisory fee increases (decreases) of (0.02%), (0.01%), (0.01%), (0.01%), 0.01%, and 0.01%.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
20
Windsor II Fund
Financial Highlights
Admiral Shares | ||||||
Six Months | ||||||
Ended | ||||||
For a Share Outstanding | April 30, | Year Ended October 31, | ||||
Throughout Each Period | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $43.26 | $39.46 | $36.51 | $67.18 | $62.41 | $56.13 |
Investment Operations | ||||||
Net Investment Income | .464 | .914 | 1.064 | 1.431 | 1.491 | 1.402 |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||||||
on Investments | 6.809 | 3.811 | 3.112 | (24.497) | 7.348 | 7.782 |
Total from Investment Operations | 7.273 | 4.725 | 4.176 | (23.066) | 8.839 | 9.184 |
Distributions | ||||||
Dividends from Net Investment Income | (.443) | (.925) | (1.226) | (1.473) | (1.481) | (1.346) |
Distributions from Realized Capital Gains | — | — | — | (6.131) | (2.588) | (1.558) |
Total Distributions | (.443) | (.925) | (1.226) | (7.604) | (4.069) | (2.904) |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $50.09 | $43.26 | $39.46 | $36.51 | $67.18 | $62.41 |
Total Return | 16.91% | 12.12% | 12.09% | -37.94% | 14.71% | 17.01% |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (Millions) | $16,405 | $13,381 | $12,060 | $11,611 | $20,250 | $15,934 |
Ratio of Total Expenses to | ||||||
Average Net Assets1 | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.22% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
Ratio of Net Investment Income to | ||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.98% | 2.16% | 3.07% | 2.76% | 2.29% | 2.39% |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 21% | 29% | 41% | 37% | 51% | 34% |
The expense ratio, net income ratio, and turnover rate for the current period have been annualized.
1 Includes performance-based investment advisory fee increases (decreases) of (0.02%), (0.01%), (0.01%), (0.01%), 0.01%, and 0.01%.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
21
Windsor II Fund
Notes to Financial Statements
Vanguard Windsor II Fund is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end investment company, or mutual fund. The fund offers two classes of shares: Investor Shares and Admiral Shares. Investor Shares are available to any investor who meets the fund’s minimum purchase requirements. Admiral Shares are designed for investors who meet certain administrative, service, and account-size criteria.
A. The following significant accounting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles for U.S. mutual funds. The fund consistently follows such policies in preparing its financial statements.
1. Security Valuation: Securities are valued as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m., Eastern time) on the valuation date. Equity securities are valued at the latest quoted sales prices or official closing prices taken from the primary market in which each security trades; such securities not traded on the valuation date are valued at the mean of the latest quoted bid and asked prices. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or whose values have been affected by events occurring before the fund’s pricing time but after the close of the securities’ primary markets, are valued at their fair values calculated according to procedures adopted by the board of trustees. These procedures include obtaining quotations from an independent pricing service, monitoring news to identify significant market- or security-specific events, and evaluating changes in the values of foreign market proxies (for example, ADRs, futures contracts, or exchange-traded funds), between the time the foreign markets close and the fund’s pricing time. When fair-value pricing is employed, the prices of securities used by a fund to calculate its net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same securities. Investments in Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund are valued at that fund’s net asset value. Temporary cash investments acquired over 60 days to maturity are valued using the latest bid prices or using valuations based on a matrix system (which considers such factors as security prices, yields, maturities, and ratings), both as furnished by independent pricing services. Other temporary cash investments are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.
2. Futures Contracts: The fund uses index futures contracts to a limited extent, with the objective of maintaining full exposure to the stock market while maintaining liquidity. The fund may purchase or sell futures contracts to achieve a desired level of investment, whether to accommodate portfolio turnover or cash flows from capital share transactions. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are imperfect correlation between changes in market values of stocks held by the fund and the prices of futures contracts, and the possibility of an illiquid market.
Futures contracts are valued at their quoted daily settlement prices. The aggregate principal amounts of the contracts are not recorded in the Statement of Net Assets. Fluctuations in the value of the contracts are recorded in the Statement of Net Assets as an asset (liability) and in the Statement of Operations as unrealized appreciation (depreciation) until the contracts are closed, when they are recorded as realized futures gains (losses).
3. Federal Income Taxes: The fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income. Management has analyzed the fund’s tax positions taken for all open federal income tax years (October 31, 2007—2010), and for the period ended April 30, 2011, and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in the fund’s financial statements. 4. Distributions: Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
5. Security Lending: The fund may lend its securities to qualified institutional borrowers to earn additional income. Security loans are required to be secured at all times by collateral at least equal to the market value of securities loaned. The fund invests cash collateral received in Vanguard Market
22
Windsor II Fund
Liquidity Fund, and records a liability for the return of the collateral, during the period the securities are on loan. Security lending income represents fees charged to borrowers plus income earned on investing cash collateral, less expenses associated with the loan.
6. Other: Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income includes income distributions received from Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund and is accrued daily. Security transactions are accounted for on the date securities are bought or sold. Costs used to determine realized gains (losses) on the sale of investment securities are those of the specific securities sold.
Each class of shares has equal rights as to assets and earnings, except that each class separately bears certain class-specific expenses related to maintenance of shareholder accounts (included in Management and Administrative expenses) and shareholder reporting. Marketing and distribution expenses are allocated to each class of shares based on a method approved by the board of trustees. Income, other non-class-specific expenses, and gains and losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
B. Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC; Lazard Asset Management LLC; Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC; Armstrong Shaw Associates Inc.; and Sanders Capital, LLC, each provide investment advisory services to a portion of the fund for a fee calculated at an annual percentage rate of average net assets managed by the advisor. The basic fee of Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC, is subject to quarterly adjustments based on performance for the preceding three years relative to the MSCI US Prime Market 750 Index. The basic fee of Lazard Asset Management LLC is subject to quarterly adjustments based on performance for the preceding three years relative to the S&P 500 Index. The basic fee of Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC, is subject to quarterly adjustments based on performance for the preceding five years relative to the MSCI US Investable Market 2500 Index. The basic fee of Armstrong Shaw Associates Inc. is subject to quarterly adjustments based on performance since January 31, 2006, relative to the Russell 1000 Value Index. The basic fee of Sanders Capital, LLC, is subject to quarterly adjustments based on performance since January 31, 2010, relative to the Russell 3000 Index.
The Vanguard Group provides investment advisory services to a portion of the fund on an at-cost basis; the fund paid Vanguard advisory fees of $57,000 for the six months ended April 30, 2011.
For the six months ended April 30, 2011, the aggregate investment advisory fee represented an effective annual basic rate of 0.15% of the fund’s average net assets, before a decrease of $2,782,000 (0.02%) based on performance.
C. The Vanguard Group furnishes at cost corporate management, administrative, marketing, and distribution services. The costs of such services are allocated to the fund under methods approved by the board of trustees. The fund has committed to provide up to 0.40% of its net assets in capital contributions to Vanguard. At April 30, 2011, the fund had contributed capital of $6,020,000 to Vanguard (included in Other Assets), representing 0.02% of the fund’s net assets and 2.41% of Vanguard’s capitalization. The fund’s trustees and officers are also directors and officers of Vanguard.
D. The fund has asked its investment advisors to direct certain security trades, subject to obtaining the best price and execution, to brokers who have agreed to rebate to the fund part of the commissions generated. Such rebates are used solely to reduce the fund’s management and administrative expenses. For the six months ended April 30, 2011, these arrangements reduced the fund’s expenses by $948,000 (an annual rate of 0.01% of average net assets).
23
Windsor II Fund
E. Various inputs may be used to determine the value of the fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels for financial statement purposes. The inputs or methodologies used to value securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
Level 2—Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—Significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions used to determine the fair value of investments).
The following table summarizes the fund’s investments as of April 30, 2011, based on the inputs used to value them:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investments | ($000) | ($000) | ($000) |
Common Stocks | 37,256,031 | 218,474 | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 1,126,345 | 65,089 | — |
Futures Contracts—Assets1 | 1,270 | — | — |
Total | 38,383,646 | 283,563 | — |
1 Represents variation margin on the last day of the reporting period. |
F. At April 30, 2011, the aggregate settlement value of open futures contracts and the related unrealized appreciation (depreciation) were:
($000) | ||||
Aggregate | ||||
Number of | Settlement | Unrealized | ||
Long (Short) | Value | Appreciation | ||
Futures Contracts | Expiration | Contracts | Long (Short) | (Depreciation) |
S&P 500 Index | June 2011 | 706 | 239,987 | 9,459 |
E-mini S&P 500 Index | June 2011 | 1,761 | 119,722 | 3,543 |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on open futures contracts is required to be treated as realized gain (loss) for tax purposes.
G. Distributions are determined on a tax basis and may differ from net investment income and realized capital gains for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statements to reflect their tax character. Temporary differences arise when certain items of income, expense, gain, or loss are recognized in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes; these differences will reverse at some time in the future. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes.
During the six months ended April 30, 2011, the fund realized net foreign currency losses of $177,000, which decreased distributable net income for tax purposes; accordingly, such losses have been reclassified from accumulated net realized losses to undistributed net investment income.
The fund’s tax-basis capital gains and losses are determined only at the end of each fiscal year. For tax purposes, at October 31, 2010, the fund had available capital loss carryforwards totaling $5,197,281,000 to offset future net capital gains of $3,383,640,000 through October 31, 2016,
24
Windsor II Fund
$1,639,579,000 through October 31, 2017, and $174,062,000 through October 31, 2018. The fund will use these capital losses to offset net taxable capital gains, if any, realized during the year ending October 31, 2011; should the fund realize net capital losses for the year, the losses will be added to the loss carryforward balance above.
At April 30, 2011, the cost of investment securities for tax purposes was $31,017,152,000. Net unrealized appreciation of investment securities for tax purposes was $7,648,787,000, consisting of unrealized gains of $10,603,357,000 on securities that had risen in value since their purchase and $2,954,570,000 in unrealized losses on securities that had fallen in value since their purchase.
H. During the six months ended April 30, 2011, the fund purchased $3,673,747,000 of investment securities and sold $4,835,979,000 of investment securities, other than temporary cash investments.
I. Capital share transactions for each class of shares were:
Six Months Ended | Year Ended | |||
April 30, 2011 | October 31, 2010 | |||
Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | |
($000) | (000) | ($000) | (000) | |
Investor Shares | ||||
Issued | 861,603 | 32,535 | 2,009,504 | 85,359 |
Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 189,627 | 7,381 | 442,058 | 19,182 |
Redeemed | (3,098,218) | (120,648) | (4,172,968) | (177,358) |
Net Increase (Decrease)—Investor Shares | (2,046,988) | (80,732) | (1,721,406) | (72,817) |
Admiral Shares | ||||
Issued | 2,067,043 | 45,637 | 1,630,761 | 38,483 |
Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 138,149 | 3,030 | 264,736 | 6,476 |
Redeemed | (1,415,397) | (30,478) | (1,725,129) | (41,294) |
Net Increase (Decrease)—Admiral Shares | 789,795 | 18,189 | 170,368 | 3,665 |
25
Windsor II Fund
J. Certain of the fund’s investments are in companies that are considered to be affiliated companies of the fund because the fund owns more than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of the company. Transactions during the period in securities of these companies were as follows:
Current Period Transactions | |||||
October 31, 2010 | Proceeds from | April 30, 2011 | |||
Market | Purchases | Securities | Dividend | Market | |
Value | at Cost | Sold | Income | Value | |
($000) | ($000) | ($000) | ($000) | ($000) | |
CenterPoint Energy Inc. | 385,047 | 39,893 | 8,552 | 9,019 | 466,230 |
Cooper Industries plc | 632,635 | — | 57,177 | 6,552 | 732,407 |
ITT Corp. | 439,950 | — | 25,443 | 4,455 | NA1 |
Quest Diagnostics Inc. | 460,663 | — | 530,770 | 863 | — |
Service Corp. International | 182,129 | — | 3,874 | 1,937 | 253,379 |
Wyndham Worldwide Corp. | 397,614 | — | 115,370 | 2,897 | 342,837 |
2,498,038 | 25,723 | 1,794,853 | |||
1 Not applicable—At April 30, 2011, the security was still held, but the issuer was no longer an affiliated company of the fund. |
K. In preparing the financial statements as of April 30, 2011, management considered the impact of subsequent events for potential recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.
26
About Your Fund’s Expenses
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur ongoing costs, which include costs for portfolio management, administrative services, and shareholder reports (like this one), among others. Operating expenses, which are deducted from a fund’s gross income, directly reduce the investment return of the fund.
A fund’s expenses are expressed as a percentage of its average net assets. This figure is known as the expense ratio. The following examples are intended to help you understand the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with those of other mutual funds. The examples are based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period shown and held for the entire period.
The accompanying table illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:
• Based on actual fund return. This section helps you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The ”Ending Account Value“ shown is derived from the fund‘s actual return, and the third column shows the dollar amount that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the fund. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.
To do so, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number given for your fund under the heading ”Expenses Paid During Period.“
• Based on hypothetical 5% yearly return. This section is intended to help you compare your fund‘s costs with those of other mutual funds. It assumes that the fund had a yearly return of 5% before expenses, but that the expense ratio is unchanged. In this case—because the return used is not the fund’s actual return—the results do not apply to your investment. The example is useful in making comparisons because the Securities and Exchange Commission requires all mutual funds to calculate expenses based on a 5% return. You can assess your fund’s costs by comparing this hypothetical example with the hypothetical examples that appear in shareholder reports of other funds.
Note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare ongoing costs only and do not reflect transaction costs incurred by the fund for buying and selling securities. Further, the expenses do not include any purchase, redemption, or account service fees described in the fund prospectus. If such fees were applied to your account, your costs would be higher. Your fund does not carry a “sales load.”
The calculations assume no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.
You can find more information about the fund’s expenses, including annual expense ratios, in the Financial Statements section of this report. For additional information on operating expenses and other shareholder costs, please refer to your fund’s current prospectus.
27
Six Months Ended April 30, 2011 | |||
Beginning | Ending | Expenses | |
Account Value | Account Value | Paid During | |
Windsor II Fund | 10/31/2010 | 4/30/2011 | Period |
Based on Actual Fund Return | |||
Investor Shares | $1,000.00 | $1,168.98 | $1.88 |
Admiral Shares | 1,000.00 | 1,169.13 | 1.45 |
Based on Hypothetical 5% Yearly Return | |||
Investor Shares | $1,000.00 | $1,023.06 | $1.76 |
Admiral Shares | 1,000.00 | 1,023.46 | 1.35 |
The calculations are based on expenses incurred in the most recent six-month period. The fund’s annualized six-month expense ratios for that period are 0.35% for Investor Shares and 0.27% for Admiral Shares. The dollar amounts shown as “Expenses Paid” are equal to the annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by the number of days in the most recent 12-month period.
28
Trustees Approve Advisory Arrangements
The board of trustees of Vanguard Windsor II Fund has renewed the fund’s investment advisory arrangements with Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC; Lazard Asset Management LLC; Sanders Capital, LLC; Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC; Armstrong Shaw Associates Inc.; and The Vanguard Group, Inc. (through its Quantitative Equity Group). The board determined that the retention of the advisors was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
The board based its decision upon an evaluation of each advisor’s investment staff, portfolio management process, and performance. The trustees considered the factors discussed below, among others. However, no single factor determined whether the board approved the arrangements. Rather, it was the totality of the circumstances that drove the board’s decision.
Nature, extent, and quality of services
The board considered the quality of the fund’s investment management over both the short and long term, and took into account the organizational depth and stability of each advisor. The board noted the following: Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC. Founded in 1979, Barrow Hanley is known for its commitment to value investing. A subsidiary of Old Mutual Asset Managers, Barrow Hanley remains independently managed. The firm has advised the fund since the fund’s inception in 1985.
Using a combination of in-depth fundamental research and valuation forecasts, Barrow Hanley seeks stocks offering strong fundamentals and price appreciation potential, with below-average price/earnings ratios, price/book value ratios, and above-average current yields.
Lazard Asset Management LLC. Lazard provides investment management services for clients around the world in a variety of investment mandates, including international equities, domestic equities, and fixed income securities. Lazard is a subsidiary of Lazard Ltd. and has managed a portion of the fund since 2007.
The investment team at Lazard employs a bottom-up stock-selection process to identify stocks with sustainable financial productivity and attractive valuations. The investment process incorporates three types of research: financial screening, fundamental analysis, and accounting validation.
Sanders Capital, LLC. Founded in 2009, Sanders employs a traditional, bottom-up, fundamental research driven approach to identify securities that are undervalued relative to their expected total return. The firm has managed a portion of the fund since 2010.
Two investment management industry veterans, Lewis A. Sanders, CEO and co-CIO of Sanders Capital, and John P. Mahedy, co-CIO and research director, serve as portfolio managers for the firm’s portion of Windsor II Fund.
Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC. Founded in 1980, Hotchkis and Wiley is a value-oriented firm that manages various large-, mid-, and small-cap portfolios. The firm has managed a portion of the fund since 2003.
Hotchkis and Wiley invests mainly in mid- and large-cap stocks with value-oriented characteristics. The advisor follows a disciplined investment approach, focusing on such investment parameters as a company’s tangible assets, sustainable cash flow, and potential for improving business performance.
29
Armstrong Shaw Associates Inc. Founded in 1984, Armstrong Shaw is an employee-owned firm that manages large-cap value products. The firm has managed a portion of the fund since 2006.
Armstrong Shaw constructs a portfolio of large-cap stocks using a combination of fundamental and qualitative criteria to identify individual companies for potential investment. The firm’s disciplined, absolute value-based approach determines the intrinsic value of a company through analysis of its cash flow or an appraisal of its assets. Candidates for purchase are stocks selling at a substantial discount to their intrinsic value, from companies that have a sound business and capable management team.
The Vanguard Group, Inc. Vanguard has been managing investments for more than three decades. The Quantitative Equity Group adheres to a sound, disciplined investment management process; the team has considerable experience, stability, and depth. Vanguard has managed a portion of the fund since 1991.
The board concluded that each advisor’s experience, stability, depth, and performance, among other factors, warranted approval of the advisory arrangements.
Investment performance
The board considered the short- and long-term performance of the fund, including any periods of outperformance or underperformance of relevant benchmarks and peer groups. The board concluded that each advisor has carried out the fund’s investment strategy in a disciplined fashion, and that performance results have allowed the fund to remain competitive versus its benchmark and its peer group. Information about the fund’s most recent performance can be found in the Performance Summary section of this report.
Cost
The board concluded that the fund’s expense ratio was well below the average expense ratio charged by funds in its peer group and that the fund’s advisory fee rate was also well below the peer-group average. Information about the fund’s expenses appears in the About Your Fund’s Expenses section of this report as well as in the Financial Statements section, which also includes information about the advisory fee rate.
The board did not consider profitability of Barrow Hanley, Lazard, Sanders, Hotchkis and Wiley, and Armstrong Shaw in determining whether to approve the advisory fees, because the firms are independent of Vanguard and the advisory fees are the result of arm’s-length negotiations. The board does not conduct a profitability analysis of Vanguard because of Vanguard’s unique “at-cost” structure. Unlike most other mutual fund management companies, Vanguard is owned by the funds it oversees, and produces “profits” only in the form of reduced expenses for fund shareholders.
The benefit of economies of scale
The board concluded that the fund’s shareholders benefit from economies of scale because of breakpoints in the advisory fee schedules for Barrow Hanley, Lazard, Sanders, Hotchkis and Wiley, and Armstrong Shaw. The breakpoints reduce the effective rate of the fees as the fund’s assets managed by each advisor increase.
The board also concluded that the fund’s low-cost arrangement with Vanguard ensures that the fund will realize economies of scale as it grows, with the cost to shareholders declining as the fund’s assets managed by Vanguard increase.
The board will consider whether to renew the advisory arrangements again after a one-year period.
30
Glossary
30-Day SEC Yield. A fund’s 30-day SEC yield is derived using a formula specified by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the formula, data related to the fund’s security holdings in the previous 30 days are used to calculate the fund’s hypothetical net income for that period, which is then annualized and divided by the fund’s estimated average net assets over the calculation period. For the purposes of this calculation, a security’s income is based on its current market yield to maturity (in the case of bonds) or its projected dividend yield (for stocks). Because the SEC yield represents hypothetical annualized income, it will differ—at times significantly—from the fund’s actual experience. As a result, the fund’s income distributions may be higher or lower than implied by the SEC yield.
Beta. A measure of the magnitude of a fund’s past share-price fluctuations in relation to the ups and downs of a given market index. The index is assigned a beta of 1.00. Compared with a given index, a fund with a beta of 1.20 typically would have seen its share price rise or fall by 12% when the index rose or fell by 10%. For this report, beta is based on returns over the past 36 months for both the fund and the index. Note that a fund’s beta should be reviewed in conjunction with its R-squared (see definition). The lower the R-squared, the less correlation there is between the fund and the index, and the less reliable beta is as an indicator of volatility.
Dividend Yield. Dividend income earned by stocks, expressed as a percentage of the aggregate market value (or of net asset value, for a fund). The yield is determined by dividing the amount of the annual dividends by the aggregate value (or net asset value) at the end of the period. For a fund, the dividend yield is based solely on stock holdings and does not include any income produced by other investments.
Earnings Growth Rate. The average annual rate of growth in earnings over the past five years for the stocks now in a fund.
Equity Exposure. A measure that reflects a fund’s investments in stocks and stock futures. Any holdings in short-term reserves are excluded.
Expense Ratio. The percentage of a fund’s average net assets used to pay its annual administrative and advisory expenses. These expenses directly reduce returns to investors.
Foreign Holdings. The percentage of a fund represented by stocks or depositary receipts of companies based outside the United States.
Inception Date. The date on which the assets of a fund (or one of its share classes) are first invested in accordance with the fund’s investment objective. For funds with a subscription period, the inception date is the day after that period ends. Investment performance is measured from the inception date.
Median Market Cap. An indicator of the size of companies in which a fund invests; the midpoint of market capitalization (market price x shares outstanding) of a fund’s stocks, weighted by the proportion of the fund’s assets invested in each stock. Stocks representing half of the fund’s assets have market capitalizations above the median, and the rest are below it.
Price/Book Ratio. The share price of a stock divided by its net worth, or book value, per share. For a fund, the weighted average price/book ratio of the stocks it holds.
31
Price/Earnings Ratio. The ratio of a stock’s current price to its per-share earnings over the past year. For a fund, the weighted average P/E of the stocks it holds. P/E is an indicator of market expectations about corporate prospects; the higher the P/E, the greater the expectations for a company’s future growth.
R-Squared. A measure of how much of a fund’s past returns can be explained by the returns from the market in general, as measured by a given index. If a fund’s total returns were precisely synchronized with an index’s returns, its R-squared would be 1.00. If the fund’s returns bore no relationship to the index’s returns, its R-squared would be 0. For this report, R-squared is based on returns over the past 36 months for both the fund and the index.
Return on Equity. The annual average rate of return generated by a company during the past five years for each dollar of shareholder’s equity (net income divided by shareholder’s equity). For a fund, the weighted average return on equity for the companies whose stocks it holds.
Short-Term Reserves. The percentage of a fund invested in highly liquid, short-term securities that can be readily converted to cash.
Turnover Rate. An indication of the fund’s trading activity. Funds with high turnover rates incur higher transaction costs and may be more likely to distribute capital gains (which may be taxable to investors). The turnover rate excludes in-kind transactions, which have minimal impact on costs.
32
This page intentionally left blank.
This page intentionally left blank.
This page intentionally left blank.
The People Who Govern Your Fund
The trustees of your mutual fund are there to see that the fund is operated and managed in your best interests since, as a shareholder, you are a part owner of the fund. Your fund’s trustees also serve on the board of directors of The Vanguard Group, Inc., which is owned by the Vanguard funds and provides services to them on an at-cost basis.
A majority of Vanguard’s board members are independent, meaning that they have no affiliation with Vanguard or the funds they oversee, apart from the sizable personal investments they have made as private individuals. The independent board members have distinguished backgrounds in business, academia, and public service. Each of the trustees and executive officers oversees 179 Vanguard funds.
The following table provides information for each trustee and executive officer of the fund. More information about the trustees is in the Statement of Additional Information, which can be obtained, without charge, by contacting Vanguard at 800-662-7447, or online at vanguard.com.
Interested Trustee1 | and President (2006–2008) of Rohm and Haas Co. |
(chemicals); Director of Tyco International, Ltd. | |
F. William McNabb III | (diversified manufacturing and services) and Hewlett- |
Born 1957. Trustee Since July 2009. Chairman of the | Packard Co. (electronic computer manufacturing); |
Board. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five | Senior Advisor at New Mountain Capital; Trustee |
Years: Chairman of the Board of The Vanguard Group, | of The Conference Board; Member of the Board of |
Inc., and of each of the investment companies served | Managers of Delphi Automotive LLP (automotive |
by The Vanguard Group, since January 2010; Director | components). |
of The Vanguard Group since 2008; Chief Executive | |
Officer and President of The Vanguard Group and of | Amy Gutmann |
each of the investment companies served by The | Born 1949. Trustee Since June 2006. Principal |
Vanguard Group since 2008; Director of Vanguard | Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: President |
Marketing Corporation; Managing Director of The | of the University of Pennsylvania; Christopher H. |
Vanguard Group (1995–2008). | Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science |
in the School of Arts and Sciences with secondary | |
appointments at the Annenberg School for Commu- | |
Independent Trustees | nication and the Graduate School of Education |
of the University of Pennsylvania; Director of | |
Emerson U. Fullwood | Carnegie Corporation of New York, Schuylkill River |
Born 1948. Trustee Since January 2008. Principal | Development Corporation, and Greater Philadelphia |
Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Executive | Chamber of Commerce; Trustee of the National |
Chief Staff and Marketing Officer for North America | Constitution Center; Chair of the Presidential |
and Corporate Vice President (retired 2008) of Xerox | Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. |
Corporation (document management products and | |
services); Executive in Residence and 2010 | JoAnn Heffernan Heisen |
Distinguished Minett Professor at the Rochester | Born 1950. Trustee Since July 1998. Principal |
Institute of Technology; Director of SPX Corporation | Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Corporate |
(multi-industry manufacturing), the United Way of | Vice President and Chief Global Diversity Officer |
Rochester, Amerigroup Corporation (managed health | (retired 2008) and Member of the Executive |
care), the University of Rochester Medical Center, | Committee (1997–2008) of Johnson & Johnson |
Monroe Community College Foundation, and North | (pharmaceuticals/consumer products); Director of |
Carolina A&T University. | Skytop Lodge Corporation (hotels), the University |
Medical Center at Princeton, the Robert Wood | |
Rajiv L. Gupta | Johnson Foundation, and the Center for Work Life |
Born 1945. Trustee Since December 2001.2 | Policy; Member of the Advisory Board of the |
Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: | Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (retired 2009) | at Syracuse University. |
F. Joseph Loughrey | Thomas J. Higgins | |
Born 1949. Trustee Since October 2009. Principal | Born 1957. Chief Financial Officer Since September | |
Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: President | 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five | |
and Chief Operating Officer (retired 2009) and Vice | Years: Principal of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Chief | |
Chairman of the Board (2008–2009) of Cummins Inc. | Financial Officer of each of the investment companies | |
(industrial machinery); Director of SKF AB (industrial | served by The Vanguard Group since 2008; Treasurer | |
machinery), Hillenbrand, Inc. (specialized consumer | of each of the investment companies served by The | |
services), the Lumina Foundation for Education, and | Vanguard Group (1998–2008). | |
Oxfam America; Chairman of the Advisory Council | ||
for the College of Arts and Letters and Member | Kathryn J. Hyatt | |
of the Advisory Board to the Kellogg Institute for | Born 1955. Treasurer Since November 2008. Principal | |
International Studies at the University of Notre Dame. | Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Principal | |
of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Treasurer of each of | ||
André F. Perold | the investment companies served by The Vanguard | |
Born 1952. Trustee Since December 2004. Principal | Group since 2008; Assistant Treasurer of each of the | |
Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: George | investment companies served by The Vanguard Group | |
Gund Professor of Finance and Banking at the Harvard | (1988–2008). | |
Business School; Chair of the Investment Committee | ||
of HighVista Strategies LLC (private investment firm). | Heidi Stam | |
Born 1956. Secretary Since July 2005. Principal | ||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Managing | |
Born 1941. Trustee Since January 1993. Principal | Director of The Vanguard Group, Inc., since 2006; | |
Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Chairman, | General Counsel of The Vanguard Group since 2005; | |
President, and Chief Executive Officer of NACCO | Secretary of The Vanguard Group and of each of the | |
Industries, Inc. (forklift trucks/housewares/lignite); | investment companies served by The Vanguard Group | |
Director of Goodrich Corporation (industrial products/ | since 2005; Director and Senior Vice President of | |
aircraft systems and services) and the National | Vanguard Marketing Corporation since 2005; | |
Association of Manufacturers; Chairman of the | Principal of The Vanguard Group (1997–2006). | |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland; Vice Chairman | ||
of University Hospitals of Cleveland; President of | ||
the Board of The Cleveland Museum of Art. | Vanguard Senior Management Team | |
Peter F. Volanakis | R. Gregory Barton | Michael S. Miller |
Born 1955. Trustee Since July 2009. Principal | Mortimer J. Buckley | James M. Norris |
Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: President | Kathleen C. Gubanich | Glenn W. Reed |
and Chief Operating Officer (retired 2010) of Corning | Paul A. Heller | George U. Sauter |
Incorporated (communications equipment); Director of | Martha G. King | |
Corning Incorporated (2000–2010) and Dow Corning | ||
(2001–2010); Overseer of the Amos Tuck School of | ||
Business Administration at Dartmouth College. | Chairman Emeritus and Senior Advisor | |
John J. Brennan | ||
Executive Officers | Chairman, 1996–2009 | |
Chief Executive Officer and President, 1996–2008 | ||
Glenn Booraem | ||
Born 1967. Controller Since July 2010. Principal | ||
Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Principal | Founder | |
of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Controller of each of | ||
the investment companies served by The Vanguard | John C. Bogle | |
Group since 2010; Assistant Controller of each of | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, 1974–1996 | |
the investment companies served by The Vanguard | ||
Group (2001–2010). |
1 Mr. McNabb is considered an “interested person,” as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, because he is an officer of the Vanguard funds.
2 December 2002 for Vanguard Equity Income Fund, Vanguard Growth Equity Fund, the Vanguard Municipal Bond Funds, and the Vanguard State Tax-Exempt Funds.
P.O. Box 2600 | |
Valley Forge, PA 19482-2600 |
Connect with Vanguard® > vanguard.com
Fund Information > 800-662-7447 | CFA® is a trademark owned by CFA Institute. |
Direct Investor Account Services > 800-662-2739 | |
Institutional Investor Services > 800-523-1036 | |
Text Telephone for People | |
With Hearing Impairment > 800-749-7273 | |
This material may be used in conjunction | |
with the offering of shares of any Vanguard | |
fund only if preceded or accompanied by | |
the fund’s current prospectus. | |
All comparative mutual fund data are from Lipper Inc. or | |
Morningstar, Inc., unless otherwise noted. | |
You can obtain a free copy of Vanguard’s proxy voting | |
guidelines by visiting vanguard.com/proxyreporting or by | |
calling Vanguard at 800-662-2739. The guidelines are | |
also available from the SEC’s website, sec.gov. In | |
addition, you may obtain a free report on how your fund | |
voted the proxies for securities it owned during the 12 | |
months ended June 30. To get the report, visit either | |
vanguard.com/proxyreporting or sec.gov. | |
You can review and copy information about your fund at | |
the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. To | |
find out more about this public service, call the SEC at | |
202-551-8090. Information about your fund is also | |
available on the SEC’s website, and you can receive | |
copies of this information, for a fee, by sending a | |
request in either of two ways: via e-mail addressed to | |
publicinfo@sec.gov or via regular mail addressed to the | |
Public Reference Section, Securities and Exchange | |
Commission, Washington, DC 20549-1520. | |
© 2011 The Vanguard Group, Inc. | |
All rights reserved. | |
Vanguard Marketing Corporation, Distributor. | |
Q732 062011 |
Item 2: Code of Ethics.
Not Applicable.
Item 3: Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not Applicable.
Item 4: Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Not Applicable.
Item 5: Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not Applicable.
Item 6: Investments.
Not Applicable.
Item 7: Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not Applicable.
Item 8: Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not Applicable.
Item 9: Purchase of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not Applicable.
Item 10: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not Applicable.
Item 11: Controls and Procedures.
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Principal Executive and Financial Officers concluded that the Registrant's Disclosure Controls and Procedures are effective based on their evaluation of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no significant changes in Registrant’s Internal Control Over Financial Reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect this control subsequent to the date of the evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Item 12: Exhibits.
(a) Certifications.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of
1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
VANGUARD WINDSOR FUNDS | |
By: | /s/ F. WILLIAM MCNABB III* |
F. WILLIAM MCNABB III | |
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | |
Date: June 16, 2011 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
VANGUARD WINDSOR FUNDS | |
By: | /s/ F. WILLIAM MCNABB III* |
F. WILLIAM MCNABB III | |
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | |
Date: June 16, 2011 |
VANGUARD WINDSOR FUNDS | |
By: | /s/ THOMAS J. HIGGINS* |
THOMAS J. HIGGINS | |
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER | |
Date: June 16, 2011 |
* By: /s/ Heidi Stam
Heidi Stam, pursuant to a Power of Attorney filed on April 26, 2010, see file Number 33-53683,
Incorporated by Reference.