UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM N-CSRS CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES Investment Company Act file number 333-123257 MARKET VECTORS ETF TRUST (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) 335 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) Van Eck Associates Corporation 335 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 10017 (Name and address of agent for service) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 293-2000 Date of fiscal year end: APRIL 30 Date of reporting period: OCTOBER 31, 2010
|
|
Item 1 – | Report to Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARKET VECTORS |
|
| |
MUNICIPAL BOND ETFs |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
High-Yield Municipal Index ETF | (HYD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intermediate Municipal Index ETF | (ITM) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Municipal Index ETF | (MLN) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Refunded Municipal Index ETF | (PRB) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short Municipal Index ETF | (SMB) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARKET VECTORS |
|
| |
INTERNATIONAL BOND ETF |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | (EMLC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Management Discussion |
| 1 |
|
|
|
Performance Record |
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 | |
|
|
|
| 6 | |
|
|
|
| 7 | |
|
|
|
| 8 | |
|
|
|
| 9 | |
|
|
|
| 10 | |
|
|
|
| 11 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 12 | |
|
|
|
| 18 | |
|
|
|
| 31 | |
|
|
|
| 38 | |
|
|
|
| 42 | |
|
|
|
| 49 | |
|
|
|
| 52 | |
|
|
|
| 53 | |
|
|
|
| 54 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 56 | |
|
|
|
| 56 | |
|
|
|
| 57 | |
|
|
|
| 57 | |
|
|
|
| 58 | |
|
|
|
| 58 | |
|
|
|
| 59 | |
|
|
|
| 65 |
|
The information in this report is not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. The information contained herein regarding each index has been provided by the relevant index providers. Also, unless otherwise specifically noted, any discussion of the Funds’ holdings and the Funds’ performance, and the views of Van Eck Global are as of October 31, 2010, and are subject to change. |
|
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this semi-annual report for the fixed income funds of the Market Vectors ETF Trust for the six months ended October 31, 2010.
Overall, the fixed income markets–both U.S. and international–generated solid absolute returns during the semi-annual period. Still, the markets were encumbered by volatility. As the semi-annual period began in May, a coordinated effort to stimulate the global economy was undertaken by the International Monetary Fund (the IMF), the European Central Bank (the ECB), the Bank of England and the U.S. Federal Reserve Board (the Fed). Their decisions were met with decidedly mixed results but did leave the U.S. fixed income market concerned about the possible dampening effect that reduced foreign demand would have upon efforts to revive the U.S. economy. Simultaneously, various U.S. data releases had already begun to shift investor sentiment from excitement about a recovering economy to disappointment that the pace of the recovery was not as robust as many had hoped. As investors lowered their expectations both for economic growth going forward and for the intensity of inflationary pressures–a classic flight to quality took hold and interest rates declined. Expectations that the Fed would soon be buying U.S. Treasuries as part of a second round of quantitative easing also kept yields well supported at low levels.
Against this broad backdrop, Van Eck Global enhanced the array of exchange-traded funds we offer our shareholders. During the semi-annual period, a new fixed income investment opportunity in the Market Vectors ETF family commenced operations—Market Vectors Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF. Meanwhile, each of the five Municipal Bond Funds of the Markets Vectors ETF Trust continued to make headlines given the unique targeted investment opportunities they offer. What follows is a brief review of the segments of the fixed income market in which the fixed income funds of the Market Vectors ETF Trust invest.
Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Market Review
The JPMorgan Government Bond Index–Emerging Markets Global Core Index1 (the “Index”) returned 9.25% during the period from July 22, 2010, the commencement date of the Market Vectors Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF, through October 31, 2010 (the “reporting period”). The Index outperformed the U.S. fixed income market, the global developed markets bond market and the U.S. equity market, as measured by the 2.16%, 6.86% and 8.77% returns of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index2, the Barclays Capital Global Government Bond Index3 and the S&P® 500 Index4, respectively, during the same time frame. The Index also outperformed its U.S.-dollar denominated counterpart, the JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Plus5, which returned 7.30% during the same period.
At a time of unprecedented sovereign debt burdens in the U.S., Japan, the U.K. and the rest of the developed world, the comparatively lower debt-to-GDP (Gross Domestic Product) emerging market nations were attractive to investors. Indeed, as the Fed and the ECB pumped liquidity into the monetary system, a good portion of that liquidity leaked its way into emerging markets debt rather than into domestic stocks or bonds as intended by the monetary policy. Investors in the developed world were also attracted to emerging market local currency debt during the reporting period because of the higher yields it offered compared to the near-zero interest rates of developed bond markets or even the approximately 3% yields on domestic investment grade corporate bonds. Further, when evaluating the risk-reward tradeoff of emerging markets local currency debt, investors took note that 80% of the countries in the Index had investment grade ratings from the major independent credit rating agencies.
Still, the risk of capital controls across emerging markets rose in the last months of the reporting period, as emerging market policy makers grew increasingly concerned about appreciation of their local currencies. As liquidity poured into emerging markets and currencies appreciated versus the U.S. dollar, local governments expressed concerns about their ability to manage domestic and economic policy. In an effort to protect the competitiveness of their export sectors, blunt currency volatility and generally avoid what it saw as “hot money,” or money that is moved from one investment vehicle to another in response to changes in interest rates, Brazil increased its tax on currency transactions from 2% to 4% and then to 6% by end of October. Thailand added a 15% tax on interest income earned by foreigners in a stated attempt to control foreign flows rather than to diminish it. Speculation regarding which country would take similar action next was high at the end of the Reporting period.
1
|
During the reporting period, Hungary, South Africa and Poland were the strongest performing markets in the Index. Most of Hungary’s return was attributable to the strong appreciation of its forint versus the U.S. dollar. Also, Hungary got its investment grade rating reaffirmed by Standard & Poor’s (S&P) after its newly elected government announced a budgetary package that calmed investors. S&P had earlier put Hungary’s credit rating on review for a possible downgrade in the aftermath of the global credit crisis and failed bailout talks between Hungary and the IMF. South Africa’s market achieved double-digit gains on the back of strength in its local bond market, appreciation of the rand, and results of infrastructure spending amidst a successful 2010 FIFA World Cup there. Poland was a top performer as the Polish zloty appreciated strongly versus the U.S. dollar. With a consensus GDP forecast of 3.5%, investors speculated that the National Bank of Poland would be the first central bank in emerging Europe to hike short-term interest rates. With near-zero interest rates in the U.S., interest rate parity suggested a rise in the zloty.
Egypt, Russia and Malaysia were the weakest markets in the Index but still generated flat to modestly positive returns during the Reporting period. Egyptian GDP grew 5.6% during the third quarter of 2010, but the market still faced headwinds from a weakening global economy. Russia’s bond market advanced slightly during the Reporting period, but the ruble depreciated. Malaysia’s weak return was due to both its bond market and its currency.
Chile and the Philippines were added to the Index during the reporting period.
Municipal Bond Market Review
The Barclays Capital Municipal Index6 (the “Index”) returned 3.95% during the six months ended October 31, 2010 (the “semi-annual period”). The high-yield municipal market was stronger, as indicated by the 6.71% return of the Barclays Capital High Yield Municipal Index7 during the same time period.
As the semi-annual period began, a “recalibration” of ratings for municipal bonds had just been launched by Moody’s and Fitch, two of the three major credit rating agencies, based upon the more broadly-recognized global criteria used for corporate debt. The effect of this change was higher credit quality ratings for most municipal bond issuers. However, as the semi-annual period progressed, the notion of “safety” and strong “creditworthiness” in the municipal bond market came under fire from a number of commentators, including Warren Buffett. That said, most current data available suggests that, on an annualized basis, municipal bond credit quality should hold up well. As evidence, some 194 municipal issues on $6.9 billion of bonds were in default status in 2009, whereas 2010 data shows there are expected to be less than 100 issuers falling into default status at a comparatively lesser market value of approximately $4 billion.
From the demand side, a record number of bonds maturing as well as paying their seasonal coupons in June and July contributed both to solid returns and to strong reinvestment activity. Further, near-zero yields offered by money market mutual funds served to entice investors to take on somewhat more interest rate risk and longer durations to achieve higher yields. Anticipation of higher marginal personal income tax rates on the state and local levels and the possibility that the Bush tax cuts on the top two federal tax brackets may expire also served to boost demand for tax-exempt bonds. Although cash flows into municipal bond funds were lower during the semi-annual period than the torrid pace of a year earlier, inflows of $500 to $600 million a week remained a strong underpinning for the municipal bond market.Another factor supporting the municipal bond market’s solid performance during the semi-annual period was the Build America Bond (BAB) program. It is estimated that approximately $130 billion of securities have come to market via this program since legislative enactment authorized them in the first quarter of 2009. These bonds are taxable, high quality and generally with long-term maturities. Although BABs have opened up municipal bond investing to a whole new category of investors, it also has had the effect of taking supply away from the long-term end of the traditional tax-exempt municipal bond market, as issuers have found it more cost efficient to raise capital through these taxable bonds. Therefore, whatever reticence there might have been from municipal bond buyers, who may have pushed prices lower over concerns for credit, economic sluggishness or news coverage of municipalities’ budgetary shortfalls, was clearly offset during the semi-annual period by the BAB phenomenon. (While the BAB program supported the performance of the municipal bond market in general, it should be noted that none of the municipal bond funds of the Market Vectors ETF Trust held any BABs during the semi-annual period.)
Forced lower by the aggressive stance of the Fed to hold rates down for the foreseeable future, lower rates across the tax-exempt bond yield curve, or spectrum of maturities, had the impact of driving investors to look for yield in intermediate- and longer-term municipal bonds. High yield municipal bonds, a reluctant participant during the spring of 2010, contributed strong returns as the semi-annual period progressed as more investors determined that a bottom had been reached in the economy and that a turn toward recovery would boost returns of both taxable and tax-exempt high yield bonds.
2
|
Perhaps the best observation to be made is that both emerging market local currency bond and municipal bond ETFs ended the semi-annual period with their appeal intact as a favorable investment alternative for a wide range of investors. They offered diversification, intraday access and competitive yields. All of these remain key benefits for investors, whatever the current market conditions. Indeed, during the semi-annual period ended October 31, 2010 alone, total assets under management in the six fixed income funds of the Market Vectors ETF Trust grew nearly 55% to more than $774 million.
On the following pages, you will find the performance record of each of the six fixed income funds of the Market Vectors ETF Trust for the period ended October 31, 2010. You will, of course, also find their financial statements and portfolio information.
I want to thank you for your participation in the Market Vectors ETF Trust. Please contact us at 1.888.MKT.VCTR or visit vaneck.com/etf if you have any questions. We value your ongoing confidence in us and look forward to helping you meet your investment goals in the future.
|
|
|
Jan F. van Eck |
Trustee and President |
Market Vectors ETF Trust |
Van Eck Global |
|
November 17, 2010 |
Represents the opinions of the investment adviser. Not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. Current market conditions may not continue.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. Current market conditions may not continue.
Investments in emerging market securities are subject to elevated risks which include, among others, expropriation, confiscatory taxation, issues with repatriation of investment income, limitations of foreign ownership, political instability, armed conflict and social instability. As the Fund may invest in securities denominated in foreign currencies and some of the income received by the Fund will be in foreign currency, changes in currency exchange rates may negatively impact the Fund’s return. Bonds and bond funds will decrease in value as interest rates rise. The Fund may also be subject to credit risk, interest rate risk, sovereign debt risk, tax risk, and risks associated with non-investment grade securities. Investors should be willing to accept a high degree of volatility and the potential of significant loss.
Municipal bonds are subject to risks related to litigation, legislation, political change, conditions in underlying sectors or in local business communities and economies, bankruptcy or other changes in the issuer’s financial condition, and/or the discontinuance of taxes supporting the project or assets or the inability to collect revenues for the project or from the assets. Bonds and bond funds will decrease in value as interest rates rise. Additional risks include credit, interest rate, call, reinvestment, tax, market and lease obligation risk. High-yield municipal bonds are subject to greater risk of loss of income and principal than higher-rated securities, and are likely to be more sensitive to adverse economic changes or individual municipal developments than those of higher-rated securities. Interest and principal payments for pre-refunded bonds are funded from securities in an escrow account. The escrowed securities do not guarantee the price of these bonds. Municipal bonds may be less liquid than taxable bonds. There is no guarantee that the Fund’s income will be
3
|
exempt from federal or state income taxes, and changes in those tax rates or in alternative minimum tax rates or in the tax treatment of municipal bonds may make them less attractive as investments and cause them to lose value. Capital gains, if any, are subject to capital gains tax.
Fund shares are not individually redeemable and will be issued and redeemed at their NAV only through certain authorized broker-dealers in large, specified blocks of shares called “creation units” and otherwise can be bought and sold only through exchange trading. Creation units are issued and redeemed principally in kind. Shares may trade at a premium or discount to their NAV in the secondary market.
Index returns assume the reinvestment of all income and do not reflect any management fees or brokerage expenses associated with Fund returns. Returns for actual Fund investors may differ from what is shown because of differences in timing, the amount invested and fees and expenses. Investors cannot invest directly in an Index.
|
|
1 | JPMorgan Government Bond Index-Emerging Markets Global Core (GBI-EM) Index tracks regularly traded, liquid, fixed-rate, domestic currency debt issues by emerging market governments. |
2 | Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index covers the USD-denominated, investment grade, fixed-rate, taxable bond market. The index comprises government securities, mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities and corporate securities to simulate the universe of bonds in the market. |
3 | Barclays Capital Global Government Bond Index contains bonds that must be rated investment grade (BAA3/BBB-/BBB- or better) by looking to the middle rating of Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch; bonds must have at least one year-to-maturity; securities must be fixed-rate. |
4 | S&P® 500 Index tracks the performance of equities for 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy. |
5 | JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Plus (EMBI+) tracks total returns for USD-denominated debt instruments of the Emerging Markets: Brady bonds, loans, Eurobonds. |
6 | Barclays Capital Municipal Index contains bonds that have at least one year-to-maturity; non-credit enhanced bonds must be rated investment grade (Baa#/BBB-/BBB- or better) by looking to the middle rating of Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch; securities must have an outstanding par value of at least $7 million; and issued as part of a transaction of at least $75 million; bonds with a dated-date of January 1, 1991 and later are eligible. |
7 | Barclays Capital High Yield Municipal Index contains bonds which are rated Ba1 or lower; have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million that are issued as part of a transaction of at least $20 million; and are issued after December 31, 1990 with a remaining maturity date of at least one year. |
4
|
HYD PERFORMANCE |
October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Return |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Share Price |
| NAV |
| INDEX1 |
| |||
Six Months |
| 4.15 | % |
| 4.53 | % |
| 6.30 | % |
|
One Year |
| 7.24 | % |
| 9.03 | % |
| 13.36 | % |
|
Life* (annualized) |
| 19.21 | % |
| 19.23 | % |
| 21.23 | % |
|
Life* (cumulative) |
| 35.68 | % |
| 35.72 | % |
| 39.72 | % |
|
*as of 2/4/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses 0.35%
The Investment Management Agreement between Market Vectors ETF Trust (the “Trust”) and Van Eck Associates Corporation (the “Adviser”) provides that the Adviser will pay all expenses of the Fund, except for the fee payment under the Investment Management Agreement, interest expense, offering costs, trading expenses, taxes and extraordinary expenses.
The price used to calculate market return (SHARE PRICE) is determined by using the closing price listed on the NYSE Arca. Since the shares of the Fund did not trade in the secondary market until several days after the Fund’s commencement, for the period from commencement (2/4/09) to the first day of secondary market trading in shares of the Fund (2/5/09), the NAV of the Fund is used as a proxy for the secondary market trading price to calculate market returns.
Fund shares are not individually redeemable and will be issued and redeemed at their NAV only through certain authorized broker-dealers in large, specified blocks of shares called “creation units” and otherwise can be bought and sold only through exchange trading. Creation units are issued and redeemed principally in kind. Shares may trade at a premium or discount to their NAV in the secondary market.
The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and value of the shares of the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance may be lower or higher than performance data quoted. Performance current to the most recent month-end is available by calling 1.888.MKT.VCTR or by visiting vaneck.com/etf. These returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund dividends and distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.
1Barclays Capital Municipal Custom High Yield Composite Index
The Index is made up of a 25%/75% blend of investment grade triple-B and non-investment grade munis, and draws 75% of its holdings from bonds issued as part of transaction sizes of $100 million or more. To be included in the Index, bonds must have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million for non-investment grade and $7 million for investment grade; 25% of index in investment-grade triple-B bonds issued as part of transaction sizes of at least $100 million in value; 50% of index in non-investment grade bonds issued as part of transaction of at least $100 million; 25% of index in non-investment grade bonds issued as part of transaction of $20-$100 million in size; fixed rate; nominal maturity of greater than one year; dated-date after 12/31/1990. Barclays Capital does not sponsor, endorse, or promote the Fund and bears no liability with respect to any such Fund or security.
5
|
ITM PERFORMANCE |
October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Return |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Share Price |
| NAV |
| INDEX1 |
| |||
Six Months |
| 4.66 | % |
| 4.53 | % |
| 4.89 | % |
|
One Year |
| 8.40 | % |
| 8.32 | % |
| 9.09 | % |
|
Life* (annualized) |
| 5.80 | % |
| 5.71 | % |
| 6.71 | % |
|
Life* (cumulative) |
| 17.82 | % |
| 17.55 | % |
| 20.78 | % |
|
*since 12/4/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses 0.24%
The Investment Management Agreement between Market Vectors ETF Trust (the “Trust”) and Van Eck Associates Corporation (the “Adviser”) provides that the Adviser will pay all expenses of the Fund, except for the fee payment under the Investment Management Agreement, interest expense, offering costs, trading expenses, taxes and extraordinary expenses.
The price used to calculate market return (SHARE PRICE) is determined by using the closing price listed on the NYSE Arca. Since the shares of the Fund did not trade in the secondary market until several days after the Fund’s commencement, for the period from commencement (12/4/07) to the first day of secondary market trading in shares of the Fund (12/6/07), the NAV of the Fund is used as a proxy for the secondary market trading price to calculate market returns.
Fund shares are not individually redeemable and will be issued and redeemed at their NAV only through certain authorized broker-dealers in large, specified blocks of shares called “creation units” and otherwise can be bought and sold only through exchange trading. Creation units are issued and redeemed principally in kind. Shares may trade at a premium or discount to their NAV in the secondary market.
The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and value of the shares of the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance may be lower or higher than performance data quoted. Performance current to the most recent month-end is available by calling 1.888.MKT.VCTR or by visiting vaneck.com/etf. These returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund dividends and distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.
1Barclays Capital AMT-Free Intermediate Continuous Municipal Index
To be included in the index, bonds must be rated investment-grade (Baa3/BBB- or higher) by at least two of the following ratings agencies: Moody’s, S&P, Fitch. If only two of the three agencies rate the security, the lower rating is used to determine index eligibility. If only one of the three agencies rates a security, the rating must be investment-grade. They must have an outstanding par value of at least $7 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $75 million. The bonds must be fixed rate, have a dated-date within the last five years, and must be at least six years but less than seventeen years from their maturity date. Remarketed issues, taxable municipal bonds, AMT municipal bonds, bonds with floating rates, and derivatives, are excluded from the benchmark. Barclays Capital does not sponsor, endorse, or promote the Fund and bears no liability with respect to any such Fund or security.
6
|
MLN PERFORMANCE |
October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Return |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Share Price |
| NAV |
| INDEX1 |
| |||
Six Months |
| 4.46 | % |
| 4.41 | % |
| 4.74 | % |
|
One Year |
| 8.32 | % |
| 8.70 | % |
| 9.79 | % |
|
Life* (annualized) |
| 2.55 | % |
| 2.48 | % |
| 5.06 | % |
|
Life* (cumulative) |
| 7.40 | % |
| 7.17 | % |
| 15.01 | % |
|
*since 1/2/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses 0.24%
The Investment Management Agreement between Market Vectors ETF Trust (the “Trust”) and Van Eck Associates Corporation (the “Adviser”) provides that the Adviser will pay all expenses of the Fund, except for the fee payment under the Investment Management Agreement, interest expense, offering costs, trading expenses, taxes and extraordinary expenses.
The price used to calculate market return (SHARE PRICE) is determined by using the closing price listed on the NYSE Arca. Since the shares of the Fund did not trade in the secondary market until several days after the Fund’s commencement, for the period from commencement (1/2/08) to the first day of secondary market trading in shares of the Fund (1/7/08), the NAV of the Fund is used as a proxy for the secondary market trading price to calculate market returns.
Fund shares are not individually redeemable and will be issued and redeemed at their NAV only through certain authorized broker-dealers in large, specified blocks of shares called “creation units” and otherwise can be bought and sold only through exchange trading. Creation units are issued and redeemed principally in kind. Shares may trade at a premium or discount to their NAV in the secondary market.
The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and value of the shares of the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance may be lower or higher than performance data quoted. Performance current to the most recent month-end is available by calling 1.888.MKT.VCTR or by visiting vaneck.com/etf. These returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund dividends and distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.
1Barclays Capital AMT-Free Long Continuous Municipal Index
To be included in the index, bonds must be rated investment-grade (Baa3/BBB- or higher) by at least two of the following ratings agencies: Moody’s, S&P, Fitch. If only two of the three agencies rate the security, the lower rating is used to determine index eligibility. If only one of the three agencies rates a security, the rating must be investment-grade. They must have an outstanding par value of at least $7 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $75 million. The bonds must be fixed rate, have a dated-date within the last five years, and must be at least seventeen years from their maturity date. Remarketed issues, taxable municipal bonds, AMT municipal bonds, bonds with floating rates, and derivatives, are excluded from the benchmark. Barclays Capital does not sponsor, endorse, or promote the Fund and bears no liability with respect to any such Fund or security.
7
|
PRB PERFORMANCE |
October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Return |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Share Price2 |
| NAV |
| INDEX1 |
| |||
Six Months |
| 2.14 | % |
| 1.85 | % |
| 1.94 | % |
|
One Year |
| 4.07 | % |
| 3.45 | % |
| 3.58 | % |
|
Life* (annualized) |
| 2.63 | % |
| 2.47 | % |
| 2.88 | % |
|
Life* (cumulative) |
| 4.63 | % |
| 4.34 | % |
| 5.08 | % |
|
*as of 2/2/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses 0.24%
The Investment Management Agreement between Market Vectors ETF Trust (the “Trust”) and Van Eck Associates Corporation (the “Adviser”) provides that the Adviser will pay all expenses of the Fund, except for the fee payment under the Investment Management Agreement, interest expense, offering costs, trading expenses, taxes and extraordinary expenses.
The price used to calculate market return (SHARE PRICE) is determined by using the closing price listed on the NYSE Arca. Since the shares of the Fund did not trade in the secondary market until several days after the Fund’s commencement, for the period from commencement (2/2/09) to the first day of secondary market trading in shares of the Fund (2/3/09), the NAV of the Fund is used as a proxy for the secondary market trading price to calculate market returns.
Fund shares are not individually redeemable and will be issued and redeemed at their NAV only through certain authorized broker-dealers in large, specified blocks of shares called “creation units” and otherwise can be bought and sold only through exchange trading. Creation units are issued and redeemed principally in kind. Shares may trade at a premium or discount to their NAV in the secondary market.
The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and value of the shares of the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance may be lower or higher than performance data quoted. Performance current to the most recent month-end is available by calling 1.888.MKT.VCTR or by visiting vaneck.com/etf. These returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund dividends and distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.
1Barclays Capital Municipal Pre-Refunded—Treasury-Escrowed Index
The Index is comprised of pre-refunded and escrowed-to-maturity municipal securities secured by an escrow or trust account containing obligations that are directly issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the U.S. government. The escrowed securities consist solely of U.S. Treasury obligations. To be included in the Index, bonds must have a nominal maturity of 1-30 years; outstanding par value of at least $7 million; issued as part of transaction of at least $75 million in value; fixed rate coupon and denominated in U.S. dollars. Barclays Capital does not sponsor, endorse, or promote the Fund and bears no liability with respect to any such Fund or security.
8
|
SMB PERFORMANCE RECORD |
October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Return |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Share Price |
| NAV |
| INDEX1 |
| |||
Six Months |
| 2.65 | % |
| 2.60 | % |
| 2.73 | % |
|
One Year |
| 4.71 | % |
| 5.09 | % |
| 5.52 | % |
|
Life* (annualized) |
| 4.84 | % |
| 4.76 | % |
| 5.30 | % |
|
Life* (cumulative) |
| 13.56 | % |
| 13.32 | % |
| 14.91 | % |
|
*as of 2/22/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses 0.20%
The Investment Management Agreement between Market Vectors ETF Trust (the “Trust”) and Van Eck Associates Corporation (the “Adviser”) provides that the Adviser will pay all expenses of the Fund, except for the fee payment under the Investment Management Agreement, interest expense, offering costs, trading expenses, taxes and extraordinary expenses.
The price used to calculate market return (SHARE PRICE) is determined by using the closing price listed on the NYSE Arca. Since the shares of the Fund did not trade in the secondary market until several days after the Fund’s commencement, for the period from commencement (2/22/08) to the first day of secondary market trading in shares of the Fund (2/26/08), the NAV of the Fund is used as a proxy for the secondary market trading price to calculate market returns.
Fund shares are not individually redeemable and will be issued and redeemed at their NAV only through certain authorized broker-dealers in large, specified blocks of shares called “creation units” and otherwise can be bought and sold only through exchange trading. Creation units are issued and redeemed principally in kind. Shares may trade at a premium or discount to their NAV in the secondary market.
The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and value of the shares of the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance may be lower or higher than performance data quoted. Performance current to the most recent month-end is available by calling 1.888.MKT.VCTR or by visiting vaneck.com/etf. These returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund dividends and distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.
1Barclays Capital AMT-Free Short Continuous Municipal Index
To be included in the index, bonds must be rated investment-grade (Baa3/BBB- or higher) by at least two of the following ratings agencies: Moody’s, S&P, Fitch. If only two of the three agencies rate the security, the lower rating is used to determine index eligibility. If only one of the three agencies rates a security, the rating must be investment-grade. They must have an outstanding par value of at least $7 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $75 million. The bonds must be fixed rate, have a dated-date within the last five years, and must be at least one year but less than six years from their maturity date. Remarketed issues, taxable municipal bonds, AMT municipal bonds, bonds with floating rates, and derivatives, are excluded from the benchmark. Barclays Capital does not sponsor, endorse, or promote the Fund and bears no liability with respect to any such Fund or security.
9
|
EMLC PERFORMANCE |
October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Return |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Share Price |
| NAV |
| INDEX1 |
| |||
Life since 7/22/10 |
|
| 9.77% |
|
| 8.73% |
|
| 9.25% |
|
Gross Expense Ratio 0.60% / Net Expense Ratio 0.49%
The Adviser has agreed to waive fees and/or pay Fund expenses to the extent necessary to prevent the operating expenses of the Fund (excluding interest expense, offering costs, trading expenses, taxes and extraordinary expenses) from exceeding 0.49% of Fund’s average daily net assets per year at least until September 1, 2011. During such time, the expense limitation is expected to continue until the Fund’s Board of Trustees acts to discontinue all or a portion of such expense limitation.
The price used to calculate market return (SHARE PRICE) is determined by using the closing price listed on the NYSE Arca. Since the shares of the Fund did not trade in the secondary market until several days after the Fund’s commencement, for the period from commencement (7/22/10) to the first day of secondary market trading in shares of the Fund (7/23/10), the NAV of the Fund is used as a proxy for the secondary market trading price to calculate market returns.
Fund shares are not individually redeemable and will be issued and redeemed at their NAV only through certain authorized broker-dealers in large, specified blocks of shares called “creation units” and otherwise can be bought and sold only through exchange trading. Creation units are issued and redeemed principally in kind. Shares may trade at a premium or discount to their NAV in the secondary market.
The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Performance information for the Fund reflects temporary waivers of expenses and/or fees. Had the Fund incurred all expenses, investment returns would have been reduced. Investment return and value of the shares of the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance may be lower or higher than performance data quoted. Performance current to the most recent month-end is available by calling 1.888.MKT.VCTR or by visiting vaneck.com/etf. These returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund dividends and distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.
1J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index—Emerging Markets Global Core
Tracks the performance of bonds issued by emerging market governments and denominated in the local currency of the issuer. Designed to be investible and excludes countries with explicit capital controls, but does not factor in regulatory/tax hurdles in assessing eligibility. Only domestic currency government bonds with greater than 13 months to maturity are eligible for inclusion in the Index. Countries are eligible for inclusion in the Index as long as they are classified as having a low or middle per capita income by the World Bank for at least two consecutive years. The maximum weight to a country in the Index is capped at 10%, the minimum is 3%.
10
|
EXPLANATION OF EXPENSES |
(unaudited) |
As a shareholder of a Fund, you incur operating expenses, including management fees and other Fund expenses. This disclosure is intended to help you understand the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The disclosure is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period, May 1, 2010 to October 31, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The first line in the table below provides information about account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period”.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line in the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as fees on purchase payments. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Beginning |
| Ending |
| Annualized |
| Expenses Paid |
| ||||
High-Yield Municipal Index ETF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
| $1,000.00 |
|
| $1,045.30 |
|
| 0.35% |
|
| $1.80 |
|
Hypothetical** |
|
| 1,000.00 |
|
| 1,023.44 |
|
| 0.35% |
|
| $1.78 |
|
Intermediate Municipal Index ETF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
| 1,000.00 |
|
| 1,045.30 |
|
| 0.24% |
|
| $1.24 |
|
Hypothetical** |
|
| 1,000.00 |
|
| 1,023.99 |
|
| 0.24% |
|
| $1.23 |
|
Long Municipal Index ETF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
| 1,000.00 |
|
| 1,044.10 |
|
| 0.24% |
|
| $1.24 |
|
Hypothetical** |
|
| 1,000.00 |
|
| 1,023.99 |
|
| 0.24% |
|
| $1.23 |
|
Pre-Refunded Municipal Index ETF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
| 1,000.00 |
|
| 1,018.50 |
|
| 0.24% |
|
| $1.22 |
|
Hypothetical** |
|
| 1,000.00 |
|
| 1,023.99 |
|
| 0.24% |
|
| $1.23 |
|
Short Municipal Index ETF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
| 1,000.00 |
|
| 1,026.00 |
|
| 0.20% |
|
| $1.02 |
|
Hypothetical** |
|
| 1,000.00 |
|
| 1,024.19 |
|
| 0.20% |
|
| $1.02 |
|
Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual (including interest expense) |
|
| 1,000.00 |
|
| 1,087.30 |
|
| 0.51% |
|
| $1.48 |
|
Actual (excluding interest expense) |
|
| 1,000.00 |
|
| 1,087.30 |
|
| 0.49% |
|
| $1.40 |
|
Hypothetical (including interest expense)** |
|
| 1,000.00 |
|
| 1,012.55 |
|
| 0.51% |
|
| $1.43 |
|
|
|
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio (for the six months ended October 31, 2010) multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184 and divided by 365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
** | Assumes annual return of 5% before expenses. |
*** | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio (for the period from July 22, 2010 to October 31, 2010) multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 101 and divided by 365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
11
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
MUNICIPAL BONDS: 97.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
Alabama: 0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
$1,500,000 |
| Alabama Industrial Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, Pine City Fiber Company Project (RB) |
| $ | 1,501,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Arizona: 2.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,000,000 |
| Pima County, Arizona Industrial Development Authority, Charter School Projects, Series A (RB) |
|
| 982,420 |
|
1,500,000 |
| Pima County, Arizona Industrial Development Authority, Charter School Projects, Series O (RB) |
|
| 1,292,910 |
|
1,770,000 |
| Pima County, Arizona Industrial Development Authority, Tucson Electric Power Company Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,778,054 |
|
1,500,000 |
| University Medical Center Corp., Arizona Hospital (RB) |
|
| 1,458,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 5,511,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
California: 5.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
750,000 |
| California Statewide Community Development Authority, Educational Facilities - Huntington Park Charter School Project-A (RB) |
|
| 614,010 |
|
500,000 |
| California Statewide Community Development Authority, Educational Facilities - Huntington Park Charter School Project-A (RB) |
|
| 392,760 |
|
1,500,000 |
| California Statewide Community Development Authority, Thomas Jefferson Law School, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,675,290 |
|
3,000,000 |
| California Statewide Community Development Authority, Thomas Jefferson Law School, Series A (RB) |
|
| 3,233,100 |
|
2,530,000 |
| Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., California Tobacco Settlement, Series A-1 (RB) |
|
| 2,290,282 |
|
4,000,000 |
| Inland Empire Tobacco Securitization Authority, California Asset Backed-Turbo, Series A (RB) |
|
| 3,332,440 |
|
1,000,000 |
| San Joaquin Hills, California Transportation Corridor Agency, Senior Lien Toll Road (RB) |
|
| 844,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 12,382,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Colorado: 0.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,500,000 |
| Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Health & Residential, Volunteers of America Care Facilities (RB) |
|
| 1,377,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Connecticut: 0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
$1,000,000 |
| Harbor Point Infrastructure Improvement District, Harbor Point Project, Series A (TA) |
| $ | 1,068,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Delaware: 0.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Delaware Economic Development Authority, Exempt Facility (RB) |
|
| 500,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
District of Columbia: 0.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,500,000 |
| Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, Dulles Toll Road, Second Senior Lien Series B (RB) |
|
| 964,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Florida: 4.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,000,000 |
| Callaway, Florida Capital Improvement Special Capital Improvement Project (RB) (ACA) |
|
| 1,750,840 |
|
2,000,000 |
| Greater Orlando Aviation Authority, JetBlue Airway Corp. Project (RB) |
|
| 1,985,040 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Lee County Industrial Development Authority, Industrial Development, Lee County Community Charter Schools, LLC Projects, Series A (RB) |
|
| 897,470 |
|
335,000 |
| Lee County, Florida Industrial Development Authority Health Care Facilities, Shell Point/Alliance Obligation Group (RB) |
|
| 289,142 |
|
1,235,000 |
| Midtown Miami Community Development District, Infrastructure Project, Series B (SA) |
|
| 1,235,753 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Midtown Miami Community Development District, Parking Garage Project, Series A (SA) |
|
| 985,990 |
|
4,000,000 |
| Six Mile Creek Community Development District, Florida, Capital Improvement (SA) |
|
| 1,300,000 |
|
500,000 |
| Sumter County, Florida Village Community Development District No. 8, Phase II (SA) |
|
| 515,045 |
|
1,525,000 |
| Wentworth Estates Community Development District, Florida, Series B (SA) |
|
| 571,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 9,531,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Georgia: 0.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,600,000 |
| DeKalb County, Georgia Hospital Authority, DeKalb Medical Center, Inc. Project (RB) |
|
| 1,657,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Guam: 3.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2,750,000 |
| Guam Government Department of Education, John F. Kennedy Project, Series A (CP) |
| $ | 2,870,642 |
|
3,250,000 |
| Guam Government Waterworks Authority, Water & Wastewater System (RB) |
|
| 3,308,565 |
|
250,000 |
| Guam Power Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 257,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 6,436,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Illinois: 5.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,000,000 |
| Illinois Finance Authority, Greenfields of Geneva Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,983,700 |
|
2,875,000 |
| Illinois Finance Authority, Park Place of Elmhurst Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 2,832,162 |
|
575,000 |
| Illinois Finance Authority, Resurrection Health Care Corp. (RB) |
|
| 608,833 |
|
4,500,000 |
| Illinois Finance Authority, Sedgebrook, Inc. Facility, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,255,500 |
|
3,945,000 |
| Illinois Finance Authority, Sherman Health System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 3,831,739 |
|
2,070,000 |
| Illinois Finance Authority, Swedish Covenant Hospital, Series A (RB) |
|
| 2,133,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 12,645,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Indiana: 2.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Indiana Finance Authority, King’s Daughters’ Hospital & Health Services (RB) |
|
| 482,230 |
|
3,000,000 |
| Vigo County, Indiana Hospital Authority, Union Hospital, Inc. (RB) |
|
| 2,865,120 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Vigo County, Indiana Hospital Authority, Union Hospital, Inc. (RB) |
|
| 953,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 4,301,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Iowa: 0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,500,000 |
| Iowa Finance Authority, Senior Living Facilities, Deerfield Retirement Community (RB) |
|
| 1,031,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Kentucky: 0.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,700,000 |
| Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Owensboro Medical Health System, Inc. Series B (RB) |
|
| 1,831,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Louisiana: 4.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
4,250,000 |
| Lakeshore Village Master Community Development District (SA) |
|
| 1,912,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Louisiana: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$660,000 |
| Louisiana Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority, Parking Facilities Corp. Garage Project, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
| $ | 656,132 |
|
3,380,000 |
| Louisiana Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority, Westlake Chemical Corp. Project (RB) |
|
| 3,574,384 |
|
500,000 |
| Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority, Westlake Chemical Corp. Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 529,535 |
|
3,000,000 |
| Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Lake Charles Memorial Hospital Project (RB) |
|
| 2,880,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 9,553,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Maryland: 1.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,000,000 |
| Frederick County, Maryland Urbana Community Development Authority, Series B (ST) |
|
| 1,979,620 |
|
2,000,000 |
| Maryland State Economic Development Corp., Chesapeake Bay Area, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,385,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,365,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Massachusetts: 0.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
800,000 |
| Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Saints Memorial Medical Center Issue, Series A (RB) |
|
| 732,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Michigan: 2.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,450,000 |
| Kent Hospital Finance Authority, Metropolitan Hospital Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 2,470,531 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Kent Hospital Finance Authority, Metropolitan Hospital Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 942,610 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Michigan State Strategic Fund, Solid Waste Disposal, Obligated-Waste Management System Project (RB) |
|
| 1,046,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 4,459,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Minnesota: 1.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Saint Paul, Minnesota Housing & Redevelopment Authority, Carondelet Village Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 502,695 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
13
|
HIGH-YIELD MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Minnesota: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Saint Paul, Minnesota Housing & Redevelopment Authority, Carondelet Village Project, Series A (RB) |
| $ | 506,295 |
|
2,000,000 |
| Saint Paul, Minnesota Housing & Redevelopment Authority, HealthEast Project (RB) |
|
| 2,005,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,014,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Missouri: 1.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,000,000 |
| Kansas City Industrial Development Authority, Missouri Health Care Facilities First Mortgage, Series A (RB) |
|
| 2,007,760 |
|
570,000 |
| Saint Louis, Missouri Industrial Development Authority, Confluence Academy Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 475,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,483,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Montana: 0.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,900,000 |
| Montana State Board, Resource Recovery, Yellowstone Energy Project (RB) |
|
| 1,888,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Nebraska: 2.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,500,000 |
| Central Plains Energy Project, Nebraska Gas Project No. 1, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,602,360 |
|
3,510,000 |
| Nebraska Educational Finance Authority, Concordia University Project (RB) |
|
| 3,088,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 4,690,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New Jersey: 5.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
8,150,000 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Gloucester Marine Project A (RB) |
|
| 7,591,317 |
|
3,000,000 |
| New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, St. Joseph’s Healthcare System (RB) |
|
| 3,164,310 |
|
2,000,000 |
| New Jersey State Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. (RB) |
|
| 1,445,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 12,201,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New York: 6.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,055,000 |
| Nassau County, New York Project Individual Development Agency, Continuing Care Retirement Home, Amsterdam at Harborside, Series A (RB) |
|
| 2,081,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
New York: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$1,950,000 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency, American Airlines, Inc. JFK International Airport Project. (RB) |
| $ | 2,102,529 |
|
4,000,000 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility, Bronx Parking Development Company LLC Project (RB) |
|
| 2,710,080 |
|
2,000,000 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility, Vaughn College of Aeronautics & Technology Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,764,960 |
|
1,500,000 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency, Queens Baseball Stadium Project (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 1,381,590 |
|
805,000 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency, Queens Baseball Stadium Project (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 715,412 |
|
2,000,000 |
| New York Liberty Development Corp., Bank of America Tower at One Bryant Park Project, Second Priority Liberty (RB) |
|
| 2,144,220 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New York Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, Southampton Hospital Association Civic Facility, Series B (RB) |
|
| 1,007,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 13,907,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
North Carolina: 0.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,250,000 |
| North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Retirement Facilities, Galloway Ridge Project (RB) |
|
| 1,256,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Ohio: 6.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,605,000 |
| Buckeye Ohio Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (RB) |
|
| 2,187,966 |
|
2,000,000 |
| Buckeye, Ohio Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, Asset-Backed-Senior-Turbo, Series A-2 (RB) |
|
| 1,526,760 |
|
1,250,000 |
| Buckeye, Ohio Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, Asset-Backed-Senior-Turbo, Series A-2 (RB) |
|
| 1,046,500 |
|
2,260,000 |
| Buckeye, Ohio Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, Asset-Backed-Senior-Turbo, Series A-2 (RB) |
|
| 1,804,474 |
|
3,000,000 |
| Cleveland, Ohio Airport, Continental Airlines, Inc. Project (RB) |
|
| 2,571,900 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Ohio: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$2,510,000 |
| Ohio Air Quality Development Authority, Ohio Valley Electric Corp. Project, Series E (RB) |
| $ | 2,746,166 |
|
1,500,000 |
| Ohio State Higher Educational Facility Commission, Ashland University Project (RB) |
|
| 1,575,675 |
|
600,000 |
| Ohio State Solid Waste Disposal, USG Corp. Project (RB) |
|
| 544,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 14,004,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oklahoma: 2.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
3,000,000 |
| Oklahoma Kingfisher Hospital Authority, Hospital & Sales Tax (RB) |
|
| 2,940,420 |
|
2,000,000 |
| Tulsa, Oklahoma Municipal Airport Trust, Series A (RB) |
|
| 2,015,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 4,956,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oregon: 0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
750,000 |
| Oregon State Facilities Authority, Concordia University Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 772,822 |
|
650,000 |
| Oregon State Facilities Authority, Concordia University Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 667,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,439,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pennsylvania: 7.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,000,000 |
| Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Hospital Development Authority, Health System, West Pennsylvania, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,609,520 |
|
3,500,000 |
| Lycoming County Authority, Susquehanna Health System Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 3,647,455 |
|
2,420,000 |
| Pennsylvania Economic Development Finance Authority, Colver Project, Series G (RB) |
|
| 2,461,527 |
|
2,000,000 |
| Pennsylvania Economic Development Finance Authority, Exempt Facilities Reliant Energy Seward LLC, Series A (RB) |
|
| 2,072,880 |
|
1,200,000 |
| Pennsylvania Economic Development Finance Authority, Exempt Facilities Reliant Energy Seward LLC, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,243,728 |
|
705,000 |
| Pennsylvania Economic Development Finance Authority, Exempt Facilities Reliant Energy Seward LLC, Series B (RB) |
|
| 730,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pennsylvania: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$4,020,000 |
| Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, USG Corporation Project (RB) |
| $ | 3,841,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 15,607,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Puerto Rico: 3.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
3,000,000 |
| Puerto Rico Commonwealth Public Improvement, Series A (GO) (NATL) |
|
| 3,319,560 |
|
4,000,000 |
| Puerto Rico Public Financing Corp., Commonwealth Appropriation, Series A (RB) |
|
| 4,142,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 7,461,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
South Carolina: 1.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
4,010,000 |
| South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority, Hospital Improvement, Hampton Regional Medical Center Project (RB) |
|
| 3,488,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
South Dakota: 2.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
4,275,000 |
| Sioux Falls, South Dakota Health Facilities, Dow Rummel Village Project (RB) |
|
| 3,335,868 |
|
1,500,000 |
| Sioux Falls, South Dakota Health Facilities, Dow Rummel Village Project (RB) |
|
| 1,366,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 4,702,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Tennessee: 0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,000,000 |
| Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,063,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Texas: 11.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,655,000 |
| Alliance Airport Authority, Texas Special Facilities, American Airlines (RB) |
|
| 2,657,496 |
|
2,000,000 |
| Austin, Texas Convention Enterprises Inc., First Tier Series A (RB) (XLCA) |
|
| 1,890,740 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Brazoria County, Texas Brazos River Harbor Navigation, Series A-4 (RB) |
|
| 1,036,770 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Hidalgo County, Texas Health Services Corp., Mission Hospital Project (RB) |
|
| 997,760 |
|
705,000 |
| Hidalgo County, Texas Health Services Corp., Mission Hospital Project (RB) |
|
| 755,316 |
|
1,560,000 |
| Red River Authority of Texas, Celanese Project, Series B (RB) |
|
| 1,575,616 |
|
2,800,000 |
| Tarrant County, Texas Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Doctors’ Hospital Project (RB) |
|
| 1,481,228 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
15
|
HIGH-YIELD MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Texas: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$1,500,000 |
| Tarrant County, Texas Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Northwest Senior Housing Corporation-Edgemere Project, Series A (RB) |
| $ | 1,496,040 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Tarrant County, Texas Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Stayton at Museum Way Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,021,180 |
|
2,865,000 |
| Texas Brazos River Authority, Pollution Control, TXU Electric Company Project, Series C (RB) |
|
| 2,727,852 |
|
6,000,000 |
| Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., LBJ Infrastructure Group LLC Project, Senior Lien (RB) |
|
| 6,558,600 |
|
3,000,000 |
| Texas State Public Finance Authority Charter School Finance Corp., Cosmos Foundation, Series A (RB) |
|
| 2,879,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 25,078,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Virgin Islands: 1.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,000,000 |
| Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Virgin Islands Matching Fund Loan Note, Diageo Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,132,230 |
|
2,270,000 |
| Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Virgin Islands Matching Fund Senior Lien, Series B (RB) |
|
| 2,320,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,452,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Virginia: 1.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
$4,000,000 |
| Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Senior Series B-1 (RB) |
| $ | 2,815,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Washington: 2.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
750,000 |
| Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Central Washington Health Services Association (RB) |
|
| 812,993 |
|
3,900,000 |
| Washington State Housing Finance Commission, Skyline at First Hill Project, Series B (RB) |
|
| 3,763,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 4,576,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
West Virginia: 1.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
3,500,000 |
| Ohio County, West Virginia County Commission Special District Excise Tax & Improvement, The Highland Project, Series B (RB) |
|
| 3,340,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Wisconsin: 1.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,670,000 |
| Wisconsin State Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Wheaton Franciscan Services (RB) |
|
| 2,540,612 |
|
500,000 |
| Wisconsin State Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Wheaton Healthcare, Series B (RB) |
|
| 485,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,026,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Municipal Bonds |
|
| 213,311,273 |
| ||
|
|
| ||||
Total Investments: 97.9% |
|
| 213,311,273 |
| ||
Other assets less liabilities: 2.1% |
|
| 4,528,550 |
| ||
|
|
| ||||
NET ASSETS: 100.0% |
| $ | 217,839,823 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
ACA | Credit Agricole SA |
AMBAC | American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. |
CP | Certificate of Participation |
GO | General Obligation |
NATL | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
RB | Revenue Bond |
SA | Special Assessment |
ST | Special Tax |
TA | Tax Allocation |
XLCA | Syncora Guarantee, Inc. |
(a) | Callable Security - the redemption date shown is when the security may be redeemed by the issuer |
(b) | Puttable Security - the redemption date shown is when the security may be redeemed by the investor |
(c) | Convertible Capital Appreciation Bond - the rate shown is the effective yield at purchase date |
* | Non-income producing |
^ | Received a partial payment on the last interest payment date. |
§ | Illiquid Security - the aggregate value of illiquid securities is $3,701,363 which represents 1.7% of net assets. |
144A | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or otherwise restricted. This security may be |
| resold in transactions exempt from registration, unless otherwise noted. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
16
|
Restricted securities held by the Fund are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security |
|
| Acquisition |
| Principal |
| Acquisition |
| Value |
| % of Net Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
California Statewide Community Development Authority, Educational Facilities – Huntington Park Charter School Project-A (RB) 5.25%, 07/01/17 144A(a)§ |
| 06/23/2009 |
| $500,000 |
| $296,250 |
| $392,760 |
| 0.2% | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of Investments By Sector (unaudited) |
| % of |
| Value |
| |||
|
|
| ||||||
Airport |
|
| 3.6 | % |
| $ | 7,622,696 |
|
Development |
|
| 16.1 |
|
|
| 34,336,991 |
|
Education |
|
| 6.1 |
|
|
| 12,922,904 |
|
Facilities |
|
| 3.4 |
|
|
| 7,300,605 |
|
General Obligation |
|
| 5.7 |
|
|
| 12,092,919 |
|
Higher Education |
|
| 4.5 |
|
|
| 9,572,584 |
|
Medical |
|
| 24.4 |
|
|
| 52,027,426 |
|
Nursing Homes |
|
| 8.2 |
|
|
| 17,518,813 |
|
Pollution |
|
| 7.9 |
|
|
| 16,823,099 |
|
Power |
|
| 2.3 |
|
|
| 4,986,841 |
|
Tobacco Settlement |
|
| 7.7 |
|
|
| 16,450,002 |
|
Transportation |
|
| 7.0 |
|
|
| 14,994,628 |
|
Utilities |
|
| 0.7 |
|
|
| 1,602,360 |
|
Water |
|
| 2.4 |
|
|
| 5,059,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| 100.0 | % |
| $ | 213,311,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of October 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Value |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total Municipal Bonds* |
| $ | — |
| $ | 213,311,273 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 213,311,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* See Schedule of Investments for security type and geographic sector breakouts
The following table reconciles the valuation of the Fund’s Level 3 investment securities and related transactions during the period ended October 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of 4/30/10 |
| $ | 1,400,000 |
|
Realized gain (loss) |
|
| — |
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
|
| — |
|
Net purchases (sales) |
|
| — |
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
| (1,400,000 | ) |
|
|
| ||
Balance as of 10/31/10 |
| $ | — |
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
17
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
MUNICIPAL BONDS: 98.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
Alaska: 0.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Alaska Housing Finance Corp., |
| $ | 515,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Arizona: 2.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Series D (RB) |
|
| 279,067 |
|
500,000 |
| Arizona State Certificates of Participation, Department of Administration, Series B (CP) (AGM) |
|
| 539,280 |
|
750,000 |
| Arizona State Transportation Board Excise Tax Revenue, Maricopa County, Regional Area Road Fund (RB) |
|
| 875,655 |
|
500,000 |
| Arizona State Transportation Board, Maricopa County Regional Area Road (RB) |
|
| 567,995 |
|
500,000 |
| Arizona State, Series A (CP) (AGM) |
|
| 564,735 |
|
500,000 |
| Arizona Water Infrastructure Finance Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 568,440 |
|
250,000 |
| Arizona Water Infrastructure Finance Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 291,675 |
|
250,000 |
| Phoenix, Arizona, Civic Improvement Corp., Light Rail Project (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 275,878 |
|
250,000 |
| Phoenix, Arizona, Civic Improvement Corp., Wastewater System (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 276,163 |
|
250,000 |
| Phoenix, Arizona, Civic Improvement Corp., Wastewater System Senior Lien (RB) |
|
| 290,997 |
|
250,000 |
| Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District, Series A (RB) |
|
| 279,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 4,809,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
California: 15.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Bay Area Infrastructure Financing Authority (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 510,600 |
|
500,000 |
| Bay Area Infrastructure Financing Authority (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 534,050 |
|
500,000 |
| Bay Area Toll Authority, Series F (RB) |
|
| 558,590 |
|
1,050,000 |
| California Long Beach Bond Finance Authority, Natural Gas Purchase, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,120,812 |
|
500,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 559,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
California: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$75,000 |
| California State (GO) |
| $ | 85,952 |
|
500,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 558,760 |
|
500,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 501,860 |
|
500,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 559,255 |
|
1,000,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 998,770 |
|
1,000,000 |
| California State Economic Recovery Bonds, Series A (GO) |
|
| 1,089,780 |
|
500,000 |
| California State Public Works Board, Mental Health Department, Series A (RB) |
|
| 527,995 |
|
300,000 |
| California State Public Works Board, Various Capital Project, Series G-1 (RB) |
|
| 310,011 |
|
500,000 |
| California State Public Works Board, Various Capital Project, Series G-1 (RB) |
|
| 554,580 |
|
2,000,000 |
| California State Various Purpose (GO) |
|
| 2,087,160 |
|
1,000,000 |
| California State Various Purpose (GO) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 1,036,220 |
|
500,000 |
| California State Veterans Affairs Department, Home Purchase, Series A (RB) |
|
| 501,560 |
|
500,000 |
| California Water Resources Department Power Supply, Series L (RB) |
|
| 586,435 |
|
250,000 |
| Coast Community College District, California Election 2002- Series B (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 276,887 |
|
250,000 |
| La Quinta, California Financing Authority, Series A (AMBAC) (TA) |
|
| 261,428 |
|
505,000 |
| Los Angeles County, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 603,783 |
|
250,000 |
| Los Angeles Department of Water & Power, Series A-1 (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 281,422 |
|
250,000 |
| Los Angeles Unified School District, Series A-1 (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 259,458 |
|
500,000 |
| Los Angeles Unified School District, Series A-1 (GO) (NATL) |
|
| 506,290 |
|
250,000 |
| Los Angeles Unified School District, Series B (GO) (FGIC) |
|
| 267,103 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
California: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Los Angeles Unified School District, Series E (GO) (AMBAC) |
| $ | 533,085 |
|
500,000 |
| Los Angeles Unified School District, Series E (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 564,135 |
|
750,000 |
| Los Angeles Unified School District, Series H (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 813,975 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Community College District, Election of 2001, Series A (GO) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 1,068,290 |
|
250,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Convention & Exhibition Center, Series A (RB) |
|
| 283,590 |
|
250,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Convention & Exhibition Center, Series A (RB) |
|
| 271,247 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Municipal Improvement Corp., Police Headquarters Facility & Public Works Building, Series A (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 1,081,290 |
|
500,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Municipal Improvement Corp., Police Headquarters Facility & Public Works Building, Series A (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 522,870 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Municipal Improvement Corp., Police Headquarters Facility & Public Works Building, Series A (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 1,096,370 |
|
500,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Unified School District, Series A (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 515,945 |
|
1,500,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Wastewater System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,753,020 |
|
500,000 |
| Sacramento City Financing Authority, Master Lease Program Facilities, Series E (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 527,290 |
|
500,000 |
| Sacramento City Financing Authority, Master Lease Program Facilities, Series E (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 533,385 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Sacramento City Financing Authority, Master Lease Program Facilities, Series E (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 1,078,940 |
|
250,000 |
| San Diego, California Community College District (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 273,442 |
|
500,000 |
| San Diego, California Community College District Election of 2002 (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 541,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
California: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| San Diego, California Community College District Election of 2006 (GO) (AGM) |
| $ | 549,410 |
|
250,000 |
| San Diego, California Community College District Election of 2006 (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 278,697 |
|
500,000 |
| San Diego, California Public Facilities Financing Authority, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 520,290 |
|
500,000 |
| San Francisco, California City & County Airports Commission, Second Series 32G (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 529,500 |
|
1,000,000 |
| San Francisco, California City & County General Hospital Improvement, Series A (GO) |
|
| 1,171,730 |
|
250,000 |
| San Francisco, California City & County Laguna Honda Hospital, Series A (GO) (AMBAC) |
|
| 272,365 |
|
500,000 |
| San Francisco, California City & County Public Utilities Commission, Series B (RB) |
|
| 516,025 |
|
500,000 |
| San Francisco, California City & Country Public Utilities Commission, Series B (RB) |
|
| 521,110 |
|
250,000 |
| San Jose, California Redevelopment Agency, Series D (AMBAC) (TA) |
|
| 266,615 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Southern California Public Power Authority, Canyon Power Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,128,570 |
|
250,000 |
| University of California Limited Project, Series A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 270,288 |
|
600,000 |
| University of California Limited Project, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 632,046 |
|
500,000 |
| University of California, Series F (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 545,660 |
|
500,000 |
| University of California, Series Q (RB) |
|
| 555,800 |
|
500,000 |
| University of California, Series J (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 515,800 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Vernon City, California, Electric System Revenue, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,051,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 35,921,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
19
|
INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Colorado: 0.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
$670,000 |
| Colorado Public Authority, Natural Gas Purchase (RB) |
| $ | 755,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Connecticut: 0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Connecticut State Health & Educational Facility Authority, Series I (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 538,650 |
|
500,000 |
| Connecticut State, Series E (GO) |
|
| 572,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,111,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
District of Columbia: 0.4% |
|
|
| |||
600,000 |
| District of Columbia, Income Tax Secured Revenue, Series A (RB) |
|
| 682,104 |
|
250,000 |
| Washington D.C. Convention Center Authority, Senior Lien, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 255,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 937,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Florida: 6.0% |
|
|
| |||
250,000 |
| Collier County, Florida School Board (CP) (AGM) |
|
| 268,183 |
|
500,000 |
| Florida Citizens Property Insurance Corp., High Risk Account, Senior Secured A-1 (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 536,725 |
|
475,000 |
| Florida Citizens Property Insurance Corp., High Risk Account, Senior Secured A-1 (RB) |
|
| 479,056 |
|
250,000 |
| Florida Citizens Property Insurance Corp., High Risk Account, Senior Secured A-1 (RB) |
|
| 269,993 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Florida Citizens Property Insurance Corp., High Risk Account, Senior Secured A-1 (RB) |
|
| 1,014,470 |
|
500,000 |
| Florida State Board of Education, Capital Outlay, Series B (GO) |
|
| 562,055 |
|
500,000 |
| Florida State Board of Education, Public Education Capital Outlay, Series A (GO) |
|
| 534,040 |
|
1,500,000 |
| Florida State Board of Education, Public Education Capital Outlay, Series C (GO) |
|
| 1,711,980 |
|
500,000 |
| Florida State Board of Education, Public Education Capital Outlay, Series D (GO) |
|
| 568,420 |
|
225,000 |
| Florida State Department of Environmental Protection, Series A (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 246,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Florida: (continued) |
|
|
| |||
$500,000 |
| Florida State Department of Environmental Protection, Series B (RB) (NATL) |
| $ | 538,915 |
|
500,000 |
| Florida State Department of Environmental Protection, Series B (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 535,560 |
|
510,000 |
| Miami-Dade County, Florida Aviation, Series A (RB) |
|
| 529,686 |
|
250,000 |
| Miami-Dade County, Florida Educational Facilities Series B (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 276,705 |
|
500,000 |
| Miami-Dade County, Florida Public Facilities Jackson Health System, Series B (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 533,855 |
|
500,000 |
| Miami-Dade County, Florida School Board Series A (CP) (AMBAC) |
|
| 546,915 |
|
500,000 |
| Miami-Dade County, Florida School Board Series B (CP) (AGO) |
|
| 552,040 |
|
250,000 |
| Miami-Dade County, Florida Special Obligation, Capital Asset Acquisition, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 261,703 |
|
250,000 |
| Orange County, Florida Tourist Development Tax Revenue (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 266,430 |
|
430,000 |
| Orange County, Florida Tourist Development Tax Revenue, Series A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 460,822 |
|
500,000 |
| Orlando, Florida Utilities Commission Utility System (RB) |
|
| 567,990 |
|
250,000 |
| Palm Beach County, Florida School Board, Series A (CP) (AGM) |
|
| 264,568 |
|
250,000 |
| Polk County, Florida School District (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 274,930 |
|
250,000 |
| Port Saint Lucie, Florida Utility System Refunding and Improvement (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 276,767 |
|
250,000 |
| South Miami Health Facilities Authority (RB) |
|
| 276,590 |
|
500,000 |
| Tampa, Florida Sports Authority (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 519,160 |
|
750,000 |
| Volusia County, Florida Educational Facilities Authority, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Inc. (RB) |
|
| 758,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 13,633,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Georgia: 3.1% |
|
|
| |||
$500,000 |
| Cobb County, Georgia Water & Sewerage Improvement (RB) |
| $ | 526,060 |
|
750,000 |
| DeKalb County, Georgia Hospital Authority (RB) |
|
| 783,322 |
|
250,000 |
| Douglas County School District, Georgia (GO) (AGM) (SAW) |
|
| 277,725 |
|
400,000 |
| Fulton County, Georgia Development Authority, Series B (RB) |
|
| 409,508 |
|
500,000 |
| Georgia State, Series B (GO) |
|
| 595,815 |
|
500,000 |
| Georgia State, Series B (GO) |
|
| 575,800 |
|
400,000 |
| Georgia State, Series B (GO) |
|
| 465,076 |
|
500,000 |
| Georgia State, Series B (GO) |
|
| 602,170 |
|
250,000 |
| Georgia State, Series C (GO) |
|
| 288,123 |
|
400,000 |
| Gwinnett County Development Authority, Public Schools Project (CP) (NATL) |
|
| 477,920 |
|
500,000 |
| Gwinnett County School District (GO) |
|
| 592,195 |
|
500,000 |
| Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project, Series B (RB) |
|
| 520,850 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project, Series B (RB) |
|
| 1,057,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 7,171,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Hawaii: 0.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Hawaii State, Series DI (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 556,170 |
|
500,000 |
| Hawaii State, Series DK (GO) |
|
| 556,030 |
|
325,000 |
| Hawaii State, Series DO (GO) |
|
| 386,220 |
|
500,000 |
| Hawaii State, Series DY (GO) |
|
| 591,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,089,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Idaho: 0.3% |
|
|
| |||
500,000 |
| Idaho Housing & Finance Association, Series A (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 590,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Illinois: 7.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Chicago O’Hare International Airport, 3rd Lien, Series A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 529,575 |
|
250,000 |
| Chicago O’Hare International Airport, 3rd Lien, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 268,288 |
|
500,000 |
| Chicago O’Hare International Airport, 3rd Lien, Series B (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 555,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Illinois: (continued) |
|
|
| |||
$500,000 |
| Chicago O’Hare International Airport, 3rd Lien, Series B (RB) (AGM) |
| $ | 548,770 |
|
500,000 |
| Chicago O’Hare International Airport, 3rd Lien, Series B (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 569,230 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Chicago O’Hare International Airport, 3rd Lien, Series B (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 1,124,870 |
|
500,000 |
| Chicago O’Hare International Airport, 3rd Lien, Series C (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 553,585 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Project & Refunding, Series A (GO) (AMBAC) |
|
| 1,111,700 |
|
250,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Project & Refunding, Series A (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 263,328 |
|
500,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Project & Refunding, Series A (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 529,055 |
|
250,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Project & Refunding, Series A (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 265,130 |
|
500,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Project & Refunding, Series A (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 520,760 |
|
450,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Project & Refunding, Series C (GO) (NATL) |
|
| 502,672 |
|
250,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Project & Refunding, Series C (GO) |
|
| 271,235 |
|
500,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Transit Authority, Capital Grant Receipts, Section 5307-A (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 543,900 |
|
750,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Transit Authority, Capital Grant Receipts, Section 5307-A (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 810,742 |
|
250,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Transit Authority, Capital Grant Receipts, Section 5307-A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 278,320 |
|
250,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Transit Authority, Capital Grant Receipts, Section 5309 (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 280,272 |
|
250,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois, Modern School Across Chicago Program, Series B (GO) (AMBAC) |
|
| 273,083 |
|
475,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois, Series A (GO) |
|
| 516,809 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois, Series A (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 1,076,020 |
|
500,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois, Series A (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 535,630 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
21
|
INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
| |||
Illinois: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois, Series A (GO) (AGM) |
| $ | 540,800 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois State (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 532,090 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois State (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 544,670 |
|
250,000 |
| Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, Senior Priority Series A-1 (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 269,095 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 518,815 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Illinois State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 1,099,760 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois State, Series B (GO) |
|
| 555,310 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois State, Series B (GO) |
|
| 544,325 |
|
395,000 |
| Kendall, Kane & Will Counties, Illinois Community Unit School District No. 308, Capital Appreciation School (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 187,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 16,720,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Indiana: 1.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Delaware County, Indiana Hospital, Cardinal Health System Obligation Group (RB) |
|
| 242,013 |
|
750,000 |
| Indiana Finance Authority Highway Revenue, Series A (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 790,305 |
|
250,000 |
| Indiana State Finance Authority Revolving Fund Program, Series A (RB) |
|
| 296,657 |
|
500,000 |
| Indiana State Finance Authority Revolving Fund Program, Series B (RB) |
|
| 569,355 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, Series B-1 (RB) |
|
| 1,133,050 |
|
500,000 |
| Indianapolis, Indiana Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, Waterworks Project (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 588,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,619,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Kentucky: 1.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Kentucky State Property & Buildings Commission, Project No. 89 (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 271,413 |
|
555,000 |
| Kentucky State Property & Buildings Commission, Project No. 90 (RB) |
|
| 624,974 |
|
250,000 |
| Kentucky State Property & Buildings Commission, Project No. 90 (RB) |
|
| 298,155 |
|
500,000 |
| Kentucky State Property & Buildings Commission, Project No. 93 (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 559,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Kentucky: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$1,000,000 |
| Kentucky Turnpike Authority, Economic Development Road Revitalization Projects, Series B (RB) |
| $ | 1,063,690 |
|
750,000 |
| Kentucky Turnpike Authority, Economic Development Road Revitalization Projects, Series B (RB) |
|
| 800,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,618,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Louisiana: 0.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| State of Louisiana, Series B (GO) (CIFG) |
|
| 287,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Maryland: 1.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Maryland State & Local Facilities Loan, First Series (GO) |
|
| 599,490 |
|
250,000 |
| Maryland State & Local Facilities Loan, Second Series A (GO) |
|
| 285,913 |
|
425,000 |
| Maryland State & Local Facilities Loan, Second Series B (GO) |
|
| 457,929 |
|
500,000 |
| Maryland State Department of Transportation (RB) |
|
| 536,225 |
|
250,000 |
| Maryland State Department of Transportation, Second Issue (RB) |
|
| 285,580 |
|
750,000 |
| Maryland, Washington Suburban Sanitary District, Consolidated Public Improvement (GO) |
|
| 814,747 |
|
250,000 |
| Montgomery County, Maryland Construction Public Improvement, Series A (GO) |
|
| 301,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,281,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Massachusetts: 2.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Brandeis University, Series O-2 (RB) |
|
| 539,875 |
|
500,000 |
| Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan, Issue I, Series A (RB) |
|
| 520,720 |
|
500,000 |
| Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan, Issue I, Series A (RB) |
|
| 528,655 |
|
500,000 |
| Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan, Issue I, Series A (RB) |
|
| 544,610 |
|
500,000 |
| Massachusetts School Building Authority, Dedicated Sales Tax, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 531,800 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Massachusetts: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| Massachusetts State Health & Education Facilities Authority, Boston Medical Center, Series B (RB) |
| $ | 248,255 |
|
600,000 |
| Massachusetts State Health & Education Facilities Authority, Harvard University, Series A (RB) |
|
| 686,838 |
|
500,000 |
| Massachusetts State Health & Education Facilities Authority, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Series C (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 511,265 |
|
475,000 |
| Massachusetts State Water Pollution Abatement, Pool Program, Series 12 (RB) |
|
| 503,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 4,615,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Michigan: 1.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
245,000 |
| Dearborn, Michigan School District (GO) (FGIC) (NATL) (Q-SBLF) |
|
| 281,032 |
|
250,000 |
| Detroit City School District, Series A (GO) (AGM) (Q-SBLF) |
|
| 257,597 |
|
250,000 |
| Detroit City School District, Series A (GO) (AGM) (Q-SBLF) |
|
| 258,630 |
|
500,000 |
| Detroit, Michigan Water Supply System, Senior Lien, Series D (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 517,140 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Michigan Municipal Board Authority Clean Water Revolving Fund (RB) |
|
| 1,074,860 |
|
250,000 |
| Michigan Municipal Board Authority Clean Water Revolving Fund (RB) |
|
| 281,915 |
|
250,000 |
| Michigan State Building Authority, Series 1A (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 169,288 |
|
250,000 |
| Michigan State Building Authority, Series 1A (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 180,310 |
|
500,000 |
| Michigan State Strategic Fund Limited, Series A (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 549,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,570,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Minnesota: 0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Minnesota State, Various Purpose Refunding, Series F (GO) |
|
| 564,855 |
|
500,000 |
| Minnesota State, Various Purpose Refunding, Series F (GO) |
|
| 567,955 |
|
500,000 |
| St. Louis Park City, Minnesota Health Care Facilities, Park Nicollet Health Services, Series C (RB) |
|
| 564,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,696,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Missouri: 1.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Jackson County, Missouri Special Obligation, Harry S. Truman Sports Complex (RB) (AMBAC) |
| $ | 532,835 |
|
500,000 |
| Jackson County, Missouri Special Obligation, Harry S. Truman Sports Complex (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 538,460 |
|
250,000 |
| Kansas City, Missouri Municipal Assistance Corp. (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 288,020 |
|
500,000 |
| Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 520,950 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Missouri State Highways and Transportation Commission, Senior Lien (RB) |
|
| 1,146,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,027,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Nebraska: 0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,000,000 |
| Douglas County School District, Nebraska (GO) |
|
| 1,089,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Nevada: 2.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
520,000 |
| Clark County Airport System Subordinate Lien, Series C (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 550,300 |
|
500,000 |
| Clark County Airport System, Senior Series D (RB) |
|
| 541,200 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Clark County School District, Series A (GO) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 1,138,610 |
|
250,000 |
| Clark County School District, Series A (GO) |
|
| 289,542 |
|
500,000 |
| Clark County School District, Series A (GO) |
|
| 563,270 |
|
250,000 |
| Clark County School District, Series B (GO) |
|
| 268,543 |
|
500,000 |
| Clark County School District, Series B (GO) |
|
| 529,410 |
|
250,000 |
| Clark County School District, Series C (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 275,415 |
|
500,000 |
| Clark County School District, Series C (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 545,850 |
|
500,000 |
| Clark County, Nevada, Series A (GO) |
|
| 526,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 5,228,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
23
|
INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey: 4.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Casino Reinvestment Development Authority, Series A (RB) (NATL) |
| $ | 524,825 |
|
500,000 |
| New Jersey State (GO) |
|
| 604,975 |
|
500,000 |
| New Jersey State (GO) |
|
| 522,525 |
|
500,000 |
| New Jersey State (GO) |
|
| 566,630 |
|
500,000 |
| New Jersey State Educational Facilities Authority, Kean University, Series A (RB) |
|
| 539,940 |
|
500,000 |
| New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 576,750 |
|
500,000 |
| New Jersey State Turnpike Authority, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 584,840 |
|
250,000 |
| New Jersey State Turnpike Authority, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 276,947 |
|
300,000 |
| New Jersey State Turnpike Authority, Series H (RB) |
|
| 344,775 |
|
500,000 |
| New Jersey Transit Corp., Series A (CP) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 558,660 |
|
500,000 |
| New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 576,750 |
|
520,000 |
| New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Series A (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 592,098 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,134,510 |
|
250,000 |
| New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Transportation System, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 250,555 |
|
880,000 |
| Newark, New Jersey Qualified General Improvement, Series A (GO) (SAW) |
|
| 902,449 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Senior Series A-1 (RB) |
|
| 938,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 9,495,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New Mexico: 0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,000,000 |
| New Mexico Finance Authority State Transportation, Senior Lien, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,102,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New York: 18.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Erie County New York Industrial Development Agency School Facilities, City School District of Buffalo, Series A (RB) |
|
| 556,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| Erie County New York Industrial Development Agency School Facilities, City School District of Buffalo, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
| $ | 296,757 |
|
250,000 |
| Erie County New York Industrial Development Agency School Facilities, City School District of Buffalo, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 295,797 |
|
500,000 |
| Long Island Power Authority, Electric System, Series E (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 572,800 |
|
400,000 |
| Long Island Power Authority, Series A (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 427,644 |
|
475,000 |
| Nassau County Interim Finance Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 517,826 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Nassau County Interim Finance Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,182,600 |
|
250,000 |
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water and Sewer System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 297,755 |
|
250,000 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Building Aid, Series S-1 (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) (SAW) |
|
| 273,643 |
|
400,000 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Future Tax Secured Subordinate, Series B (RB) |
|
| 461,936 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Future Tax Secured Subordinate, Series D (RB) |
|
| 1,146,380 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Series B (RB) |
|
| 557,050 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Series D (RB) |
|
| 582,540 |
|
600,000 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Series S-1 (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) (SAW) |
|
| 681,576 |
|
275,000 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Series S-3 (RB) (SAW) |
|
| 305,717 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City, Series A-1 (GO) |
|
| 586,945 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City, Series B (GO) |
|
| 586,945 |
|
250,000 |
| New York City, Series C (GO) |
|
| 283,058 |
|
250,000 |
| New York City, Series C (GO) |
|
| 270,223 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
New York: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| New York City, Series D-1 (GO) |
| $ | 281,100 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City, Series E (GO) |
|
| 551,690 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New York City, Series E (GO) |
|
| 1,109,720 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City, Series E (GO) |
|
| 583,960 |
|
375,000 |
| New York City, Series G (GO) |
|
| 416,839 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City, Series G (GO) |
|
| 563,555 |
|
250,000 |
| New York City, Series I-1 (GO) |
|
| 280,368 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City, Series J-1 (GO) |
|
| 564,745 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City, Sub Series C-1 (GO) |
|
| 557,035 |
|
250,000 |
| New York City, Sub Series F-1 (GO) (XLCA) |
|
| 274,193 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City, Sub Series J-1 (GO) |
|
| 568,880 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City, Sub Series L-1 (GO) |
|
| 555,465 |
|
475,000 |
| New York Local Government Assistant Corp., Series A (RB) |
|
| 503,676 |
|
250,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority Non State Supported Debt School, District Financing Program, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 291,827 |
|
1,975,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Consolidated Service Contract, Series A (RB) |
|
| 2,042,189 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Consolidating Service Contract, Series A (RB) |
|
| 554,020 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series A (RB) |
|
| 569,535 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series A (RB) |
|
| 600,500 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series A (RB) |
|
| 591,510 |
|
295,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series A (RB) |
|
| 326,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
New York: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series B (RB) |
| $ | 591,510 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series C (RB) |
|
| 1,124,240 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series D (RB) |
|
| 595,355 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series D (RB) |
|
| 588,025 |
|
250,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series F (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 271,058 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series G (RB) |
|
| 590,550 |
|
250,000 |
| New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., State Clean Water, New York City, Municipal Water Finance Authority Projects, Series A (RB) |
|
| 269,635 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., State Clean Water, New York City, Municipal Water Finance Authority Projects, Series B (RB) |
|
| 547,800 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., State Clean Water, New York City, Municipal Water Finance Authority Projects, Series B (RB) |
|
| 537,540 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Municipal Bond Bank Agency, Series C (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 576,645 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Second General Highway & Bridge Trust Fund, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,114,410 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Second General Highway & Bridges Trust Fund, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 549,335 |
|
250,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Second General Highway & Bridges Trust Fund, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 269,610 |
|
350,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Second General Highway & Bridges Trust Fund, Series A (RB) |
|
| 391,510 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
25
|
INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
New York: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Second General Highway & Bridges Trust Fund, Series A (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
| $ | 289,220 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Second General Highway & Bridges Trust Fund, Series B (RB) |
|
| 1,110,140 |
|
250,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Second General Highway & Bridges Trust Fund, Series B (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 286,802 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Series H (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 560,230 |
|
525,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, State Personal Income Tax (Transportation) Series A (RB) |
|
| 579,101 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, State Personal Income Tax (Transportation) Series A (RB) |
|
| 593,000 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, State Personal Income Tax (Transportation) Series A (RB) |
|
| 574,695 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, State Personal Income Tax (Transportation) Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,124,780 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, State Personal Income Tax (Transportation) Series A (RB) |
|
| 565,020 |
|
510,000 |
| New York State Urban Development Corp., Service Contract, Series D (RB) |
|
| 609,001 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New York State Urban Development Corp., State Personal Income, Economic Development & Housing, Series A-1 (RB) |
|
| 1,190,920 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Urban Development Corp., State Personal Income, Series C (RB) |
|
| 537,605 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Urban Development Corp., State Personal Income, Series C (RB) |
|
| 600,500 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 532,330 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New York State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 1,043,490 |
|
500,000 |
| Oyster Bay, New York Public Improvement (GO) |
|
| 498,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
New York: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Suffolk County, New York Public Improvement Series C (GO) |
| $ | 521,015 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Suffolk County, New York Public Improvement Series C (GO) |
|
| 1,109,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 42,014,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Ohio: 1.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Columbus, Ohio City School District (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 267,960 |
|
450,000 |
| Columbus, Ohio State (GO) |
|
| 480,465 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Hamilton County, Ohio Sales Tax, Subordinate Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 1,091,180 |
|
530,000 |
| Kent State University, Series B (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 583,890 |
|
250,000 |
| Ohio State Major New State Infrastructure Project, Series 2008-1 (RB) |
|
| 308,368 |
|
500,000 |
| Ohio State Water Development Authority Pollution Control (RB) |
|
| 540,965 |
|
450,000 |
| Ohio State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 503,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,776,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oklahoma: 0.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Grand River Dam Authority, Series A (RB) (BHAC) |
|
| 285,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oregon: 2.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,000,000 |
| Marion & Polk Counties, Oregon Salem-Keizer School District No. 24J, Deferred Interest, Series B (GO) (SBG) |
|
| 629,800 |
|
500,000 |
| Oregon Administrative Services, Oregon State Lottery, Series A (RB) |
|
| 566,685 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Oregon Administrative Services, Oregon State Lottery, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,141,390 |
|
250,000 |
| Port Portland, Oregon International Airport, Series 19 (RB) |
|
| 274,933 |
|
500,000 |
| Portland, Oregon Community College District (GO) |
|
| 571,745 |
|
475,000 |
| Portland, Oregon Sewer System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 504,289 |
|
675,000 |
| Portland, Oregon Sewer System, Series B (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 757,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 4,445,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania: 4.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Airport Authority, Series B (RB) (AGM) |
| $ | 523,230 |
|
500,000 |
| Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Hospital Development Authority, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Series A (RB) |
|
| 569,245 |
|
500,000 |
| Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Hospital Development Authority, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Series B (RB) |
|
| 573,010 |
|
250,000 |
| Easton, Pennsylvania Area School District (GO) (AGM) (SAW) |
|
| 303,985 |
|
250,000 |
| Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Health System, Albert Einstein Healthcare, Series A (RB) |
|
| 270,258 |
|
250,000 |
| Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission Registration Fee, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 291,955 |
|
500,000 |
| Pennsylvania State, First Series A (GO) |
|
| 598,770 |
|
250,000 |
| Pennsylvania State, Second Series (GO) |
|
| 299,902 |
|
500,000 |
| Pennsylvania State, Second Series (GO) |
|
| 560,415 |
|
500,000 |
| Pennsylvania State, Second Series (GO) |
|
| 598,750 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Pennsylvania State, Second Series B (GO) |
|
| 1,197,830 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Philadelphia City, Series A (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 1,114,140 |
|
1,500,000 |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania School District, Series C (GO) (SAW) |
|
| 1,678,995 |
|
500,000 |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Water & Wastewater, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 509,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 9,090,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Puerto Rico: 2.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ (RB) |
|
| 559,980 |
|
300,000 |
| Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT (RB) |
|
| 319,722 |
|
500,000 |
| Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT (RB) |
|
| 560,595 |
|
500,000 |
| Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series VV (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 556,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Puerto Rico: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$1,000,000 |
| Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ (RB) |
| $ | 1,074,400 |
|
500,000 |
| Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority, Series N (RB) |
|
| 546,370 |
|
300,000 |
| Puerto Rico Municipal Finance Agency, Series A (GO) |
|
| 311,310 |
|
250,000 |
| Puerto Rico Municipal Finance Agency, Series A (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 261,350 |
|
500,000 |
| Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Government Facilities, Series P (RB) (COMWLTH GTD) |
|
| 561,425 |
|
500,000 |
| University of Puerto Rico, Series P (RB) |
|
| 538,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 5,289,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Rhode Island: 0.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
955,000 |
| Rhode Island Economic Development Corp., Transportation Department, Series A (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 1,110,761 |
|
250,000 |
| Rhode Island State & Providence Plantations, Consolidated Capital Development Loan, Series C (GO) (NATL) |
|
| 270,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,381,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
South Carolina: 1.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
710,000 |
| Greenville County, South Carolina School District (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 765,415 |
|
500,000 |
| Greenville County, South Carolina School District Installment (RB) |
|
| 534,235 |
|
625,000 |
| South Carolina State Economic Development, Series A (GO) |
|
| 535,844 |
|
1,000,000 |
| South Carolina State Economic Development, Series A (GO) |
|
| 1,096,920 |
|
250,000 |
| South Carolina State Public Service Authority, Series B (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 272,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,205,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Tennessee: 1.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County (GO) |
|
| 579,345 |
|
250,000 |
| Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, Series C (GO) |
|
| 290,885 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
|
INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Series A (RB) |
| $ | 263,362 |
|
500,000 |
| Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Series A (RB) |
|
| 535,760 |
|
645,000 |
| Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Series C (RB) |
|
| 672,806 |
|
500,000 |
| Tennessee State, Series B (GO) |
|
| 536,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,878,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Texas: 6.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
| City of Irving, Texas Refunding & Improvement Bonds (GO) |
|
| 1,169,080 |
|
250,000 |
| Cypress-Fairbanks, Texas Independent School District (GO) |
|
| 277,345 |
|
250,000 |
| EL Paso, Texas Hospital District, Series A (GO) (AGO) |
|
| 274,273 |
|
250,000 |
| Houston, Texas Independent School District (GO) |
|
| 277,975 |
|
500,000 |
| Houston, Texas Independent School District, Series B (GO) |
|
| 528,250 |
|
250,000 |
| Houston, Texas Independent School District, Series B (GO) |
|
| 276,918 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Houston, Texas Public Improvement Refunding, Series A (GO) |
|
| 1,130,630 |
|
500,000 |
| Houston, Texas Public Improvement Refunding, Series A (GO) |
|
| 552,230 |
|
250,000 |
| Houston, Texas Public Improvement Refunding, Series E (GO) (AMBAC) |
|
| 276,450 |
|
250,000 |
| Leander Independent School District (GO) |
|
| 140,353 |
|
425,000 |
| Lewisville Independent School District (GO) |
|
| 475,141 |
|
500,000 |
| North East Independent School District (GO) |
|
| 559,615 |
|
250,000 |
| North East Independent School District, Series A (GO) |
|
| 294,675 |
|
750,000 |
| San Antonio, Texas Electric & Gas Systems (RB) |
|
| 826,275 |
|
555,000 |
| San Antonio, Texas Electric & Gas Systems, (RB) |
|
| 605,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$5,000 |
| San Antonio, Texas Electric & Gas Systems, Junior Lien (RB) |
| $ | 5,829 |
|
400,000 |
| San Antonio, Texas Electric & Gas Systems, Series A (RB) |
|
| 433,136 |
|
500,000 |
| San Antonio, Texas Electric & Gas Systems, Series A (RB) |
|
| 577,265 |
|
500,000 |
| San Antonio, Texas Electric & Gas Systems, Series D (RB) |
|
| 593,630 |
|
250,000 |
| Tarrant County, Texas Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp., Texas Health Resources (RB) |
|
| 256,345 |
|
500,000 |
| Tarrant Regional Water District (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 526,115 |
|
500,000 |
| Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp., Gas Supply, Senior Lien Series A (RB) |
|
| 527,380 |
|
225,000 |
| Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp., Gas Supply, Senior Lien Series A (RB) |
|
| 238,397 |
|
250,000 |
| Texas State University System Financing (RB) |
|
| 283,562 |
|
500,000 |
| Texas Transportation Commission, Mobility Fund, Series A (GO) |
|
| 549,045 |
|
250,000 |
| Texas Transportation Commission, State Highway Fund, First Tier (RB) |
|
| 280,662 |
|
250,000 |
| Texas Transportation Commission, State Highway Fund, First Tier, Series A (RB) |
|
| 286,897 |
|
500,000 |
| Texas Water Development Board, Subordinate Lien, Series B (RB) |
|
| 584,380 |
|
500,000 |
| University of Texas, Revenue Financing System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 581,700 |
|
500,000 |
| University of Texas, Revenue Financing System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 574,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 13,963,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Utah: 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
| Utah Transportation Authority Sales Tax Revenue, Series A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 155,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Virginia: 1.1% |
| |||||
500,000 |
| Virginia College Building Authority, 21st Century College & Equipment Programs Educational Facilities, Series A (RB) |
|
| 590,955 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia: (continued) |
|
|
| |||
$250,000 |
| Virginia Resources Authority Clean Water Revolving Fund (RB) |
| $ | 296,763 |
|
250,000 |
| Virginia State Public Building Authority, Public Facilities, Series B (RB) |
|
| 284,075 |
|
500,000 |
| Virginia State Public Building Authority, Public Facilities, Series B (RB) |
|
| 527,125 |
|
200,000 |
| Virginia State Public Building Authority, Public Facilities, Series B (RB) |
|
| 228,572 |
|
500,000 |
| Virginia State Public Building Authority, School Financing, Series B (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 530,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,457,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Washington: 3.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
525,000 |
| Energy Northwest, Washington Electric Revenue Refunding, Columbia State, Series A (RB) |
|
| 581,002 |
|
400,000 |
| King County Washington Highline School District No. 401 (GO) (AGM) (SBG) |
|
| 449,416 |
|
250,000 |
| King County Washington Highline School District No. 411 (GO) (AGM) (SBG) |
|
| 288,342 |
|
500,000 |
| King County, Washington Public Hospital District No. 1, Series A (GO) (AGO) |
|
| 560,965 |
|
500,000 |
| Pierce County, Washington School District, Series A (GO) (AGM) (SBG) |
|
| 573,900 |
|
250,000 |
| Port Seattle, Washington, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 282,673 |
|
500,000 |
| Washington State Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax, Series B (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 560,260 |
|
500,000 |
| Washington State Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax, Series B (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 549,230 |
|
500,000 |
| Washington State Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax, Series B (GO) (AMBAC) |
|
| 559,950 |
|
200,000 |
| Washington State, Series A (GO) (AMBAC) |
|
| 219,742 |
|
500,000 |
| Washington State, Various Purpose, Series A (GO) |
|
| 558,900 |
|
500,000 |
| Washington State, Various Purpose, Series A (GO) |
|
| 573,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Washington: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Washington State, Various Purpose, Series A (GO) (AMBAC) |
| $ | 570,645 |
|
500,000 |
| Washington State, Various Purpose, Series C (GO) |
|
| 555,480 |
|
250,000 |
| Washington State, Various Purpose, Series C (GO) |
|
| 295,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 7,179,862 |
|
|
|
| ||||
West Virginia: 0.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, Charleston Area Medical Center, Hospital Revenue & Improvement, Series A (RB) |
|
| 518,255 |
|
225,000 |
| West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, Charleston Area Medical Center, Hospital Revenue & Improvement, Series A (RB) |
|
| 243,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 761,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Wisconsin: 1.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
400,000 |
| Central Brown County Water Authority (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 430,768 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Milwaukee City, Series N1 (GO) |
|
| 1,180,400 |
|
250,000 |
| Wisconsin State Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Wheaton Franciscan Health Care System (RB) |
|
| 266,110 |
|
25,000 |
| Wisconsin State Transportation, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 29,622 |
|
775,000 |
| Wisconsin State, General Annual Appropriation, Series A (RB) |
|
| 906,293 |
|
250,000 |
| Wisconsin State, Series C (GO) |
|
| 280,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,093,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Municipal Bonds |
|
| 224,868,399 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Number of |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Money Market Fund: 0.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
108,802 |
| Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management Fund - Class B Shares |
|
| 108,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Investments: 98.7% |
|
| 224,977,201 |
| ||
Other assets less liabilities: 1.3% |
|
| 2,855,535 |
| ||
|
|
| ||||
NET ASSETS: 100.0% |
| $ | 227,832,736 |
| ||
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
29
|
INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
AGM | Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. |
AGO | Assured Guaranty Ltd. |
AMBAC | American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. |
BHAC | Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp. |
CIFG | CDC Ixis Financial Guaranty |
COMWLTH GTD | Commonwealth Guaranteed |
CP | Certificate of Participation |
FGIC | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. |
GO | General Obligation |
NATL | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
Q-SBLF | Qualified School Board Loan Fund |
RB | Revenue Bond |
SAW | State Aid Withholding |
SBG | School Board Guaranteed |
TA | Tax Allocation |
XLCA | Syncora Guarantee, Inc. |
|
|
(a) | Callable Security - the redemption date shown is when the security may be redeemed by the issuer |
(b) | Zero Coupon Bond - the rate shown is the effective yield at purchase date |
(c) | Puttable Security - the redemption date shown is when the security may be redeemed by the investor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of Investments By Sector (unaudited) |
|
| % of |
| Value |
| ||
|
|
|
| |||||
Airport |
| 3.2 | % |
| $ | 7,098,421 |
| |
Bond Bank |
| 1.0 |
|
|
| 2,297,835 |
| |
Development |
| 1.0 |
|
|
| 2,285,736 |
| |
Education |
| 5.1 |
|
|
| 11,562,630 |
| |
Facilities |
| 8.3 |
|
|
| 18,587,025 |
| |
General |
| 0.3 |
|
|
| 682,104 |
| |
General Obligation |
| 33.0 |
|
|
| 74,319,876 |
| |
Higher Education |
| 8.1 |
|
|
| 18,309,888 |
| |
Medical |
| 3.0 |
|
|
| 6,663,244 |
| |
Pollution |
| 0.6 |
|
|
| 1,354,975 |
| |
Power |
| 5.5 |
|
|
| 12,240,064 |
| |
School District |
| 8.2 |
|
|
| 18,344,950 |
| |
Single Family Housing |
| 0.4 |
|
|
| 1,017,355 |
| |
Student Loan |
| 0.7 |
|
|
| 1,593,985 |
| |
Tobacco Settlement |
| 0.4 |
|
|
| 938,570 |
| |
Transportation |
| 12.2 |
|
|
| 27,417,411 |
| |
Utilities |
| 3.5 |
|
|
| 7,874,512 |
| |
Water |
| 5.5 |
|
|
| 12,279,818 |
| |
Money Market Fund |
| 0.0 |
|
|
| 108,802 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| 100.0 | % |
| $ | 224,977,201 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
The summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of October 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Value |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Municipal Bonds* |
| $ | — |
| $ | 224,868,399 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 224,868,399 |
|
Money Market Fund |
|
| 108,802 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 108,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total |
| $ | 108,802 |
| $ | 224,868,399 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 224,977,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* See Schedule of Investments for security type and geographic sector breakouts |
See Notes to Financial Statements
30
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MUNICIPAL BONDS: 98.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
Alabama: 0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Birmingham, Alabama Capital Improvement and Refunding, Series A (GO) (AMBAC) |
| $ | 500,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Alaska: 0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Alaska State Housing Corp. General Housing, Series A (RB) (FGIC) |
|
| 254,760 |
|
250,000 |
| Alaska State Housing Corp. Home Mortgage, Series A (RB) |
|
| 260,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 515,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Arizona: 1.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Series D (RB) |
|
| 261,715 |
|
250,000 |
| Mesa, Arizona Industrial Development Authority, Clark County Detention Facility Project (RB) |
|
| 252,428 |
|
250,000 |
| Mesa, Arizona Utility System, Second Series (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 257,087 |
|
250,000 |
| Salt Verde Financial Corp. (RB) |
|
| 242,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,013,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
California: 19.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Anaheim, California Public Financing Authority, Electricity Distribution Facilities (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 503,305 |
|
500,000 |
| Anaheim, California Public Financing Authority, Lease Revenue, Project A-1 (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 497,210 |
|
500,000 |
| Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency, Series A-1 (CP) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 462,605 |
|
250,000 |
| Bay Area Toll Authority, Series F (RB) |
|
| 261,922 |
|
500,000 |
| California Health Facilities Financing Authority (RB) |
|
| 496,355 |
|
250,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 247,768 |
|
1,000,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 974,390 |
|
500,000 |
| California State (GO) (AMBAC) |
|
| 494,545 |
|
250,000 |
| California State Public Works Board (RB) |
|
| 262,250 |
|
500,000 |
| California State University Systemwide, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 515,755 |
|
500,000 |
| California State Various Purpose (GO) |
|
| 529,820 |
|
375,000 |
| California State Various Purpose (GO) |
|
| 409,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| California State Various Purpose (GO) |
| $ | 501,090 |
|
1,000,000 |
| California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 982,490 |
|
500,000 |
| California Statewide Community Development Authority - Health Facilities (RB) |
|
| 496,295 |
|
300,000 |
| Chabot-Los Positas, California Community College (GO) (AMBAC) |
|
| 315,243 |
|
500,000 |
| Desert Community College District, Election of 2004, Series C (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 519,380 |
|
250,000 |
| Eastern Municipal Water District, California Water & Sewer, Series H (CP) |
|
| 263,977 |
|
550,000 |
| Fresno, California Central Unified School District, Election 2008-Series A (GO) (AGO) |
|
| 610,335 |
|
500,000 |
| Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., Series A-1 (RB) |
|
| 359,410 |
|
250,000 |
| Grossmont-Cuyamaca, California Community College District, Election 2002, Series C (GO) (AGO) |
|
| 79,923 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Kern Community College, Safety, Repair & Improvement District (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 313,890 |
|
250,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Community College District, Election of 2001, Series A (GO) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 261,177 |
|
250,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Community College District, Election of 2001, Series E-1 (GO) |
|
| 261,575 |
|
250,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Department of Water & Power System, Sub-Series A-1 (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 258,588 |
|
250,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Unified School District, Series A (GO) (NATL) |
|
| 246,458 |
|
500,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Unified School District, Series B (GO) (AMBAC) |
|
| 482,995 |
|
250,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Unified School District, Series E (GO) (AMBAC) |
|
| 258,053 |
|
350,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Wastewater System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 381,976 |
|
250,000 |
| Sacramento, California Sanitation District Financing Authority (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 259,342 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
31
|
LONG MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
California: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Sacramento, California Sanitation District Financing Authority (RB) (NATL) |
| $ | 518,535 |
|
250,000 |
| San Francisco, California Bay Area Rapid Transportation District, Series A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 260,090 |
|
270,000 |
| San Mateo County, California Transportation, Series A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 272,867 |
|
250,000 |
| Santa Clara Valley, California Water Distribution, Series A (CP) (NATL) |
|
| 261,675 |
|
250,000 |
| Ventura County, California Community College District, Election 2002, Series B (GO) (NATL) |
|
| 263,230 |
|
250,000 |
| West Valley Mission Community College District, Election 2004-A (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 265,602 |
|
250,000 |
| William S. Hart, California High School District, Election 2001, Series B (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 86,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 14,436,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Colorado: 1.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Adams County, Colorado FHA Insured Mortgage-Platte Valley Medical Center (RB) (FHA) (NATL) |
|
| 248,408 |
|
500,000 |
| Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Sister of Charity of Leavenworth Health System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 509,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 758,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
District of Columbia: 2.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
750,000 |
| District of Columbia, Children’s Hospital Obligated Group (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 760,365 |
|
500,000 |
| District of Columbia, National Public Radio, Inc. Issue (RB) |
|
| 528,820 |
|
500,000 |
| District of Columbia, Series A (GO) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 503,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,792,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Florida: 5.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Broward County, Florida Educational Facilities Authority, Nova Southeastern University Project (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 510,425 |
|
250,000 |
| Jacksonville, Florida Better Jacksonville Sales Tax Revenue (RB) |
|
| 264,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Florida: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| Miami-Dade County, Florida Building Better Communities Program, Series A (GO) (AGO) |
| $ | 260,147 |
|
250,000 |
| Miami-Dade County, Florida Expressway Authority (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 254,670 |
|
500,000 |
| Miami-Dade County, Florida Miami International Airport, Series B (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 504,860 |
|
250,000 |
| Miami-Dade County, Florida School Board, Series A (CP) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 248,695 |
|
250,000 |
| Palm Beach County, Florida Public Improvement (RB) |
|
| 261,272 |
|
900,000 |
| Palm Beach County, Florida Public Improvement, Series 2 (RB) |
|
| 996,282 |
|
250,000 |
| University of Central Florida Convocation Corp., Series A (CP) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 246,138 |
|
250,000 |
| University of Northern Florida Financing Corp. (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 257,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,804,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Georgia: 3.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Atlanta, Georgia Water & Wastewater System (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 252,610 |
|
500,000 |
| Carroll City-County Hospital Authority (RB) |
|
| 490,175 |
|
375,000 |
| Columbus Medical Center Hospital Authority, Regional Healthcare System (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 376,406 |
|
500,000 |
| Gainesville City & Hall County, Georgia Hospital Authority, Northeast Georgia Health System, Inc. Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 501,655 |
|
325,000 |
| Gainesville City & Hall County, Georgia Hospital Authority, Northeast Georgia Health System, Inc. Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 328,737 |
|
250,000 |
| Gainesville City & Hall County, Georgia Hospital Authority, Northeast Georgia Health System, Inc. Project, Series B (RB) |
|
| 255,883 |
|
425,000 |
| Georgia Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, Sales Tax, Third Indenture, Series A (RB) |
|
| 451,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,656,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Illinois: 4.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Project and Refunding, Series A (GO) (AGM) |
| $ | 504,065 |
|
500,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Project and Refunding, Series B (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 520,830 |
|
500,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Project and Refunding, Series C (GO) (NATL) |
|
| 528,290 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois Finance Authority, OSF Healthcare System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 517,800 |
|
250,000 |
| Illinois Finance Authority, OSF Healthcare System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 257,415 |
|
500,000 |
| Springfield, Illinois Electric, Senior Lien (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 520,585 |
|
500,000 |
| University of Chicago, Illinois Finance Authority (RB) |
|
| 516,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,365,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Indiana: 2.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Carmel Industrial Redevelopment Authority (RB) |
|
| 264,860 |
|
500,000 |
| Indiana Finance Authority, King’s Daughters’ Hospital & Health Services (RB) |
|
| 482,230 |
|
250,000 |
| Indiana Health & Educational Facility Financing Authority, Senior Series 2006 B-5 (RB) |
|
| 256,270 |
|
350,000 |
| Indiana Health & Educational Facility Financing Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 357,298 |
|
700,000 |
| Indianapolis Local Public Improvement, Waterworks Project, Series A (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 760,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,121,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Kansas: 0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Burlington, Kansas Pollution Control, Project A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 255,868 |
|
250,000 |
| Kansas State Development Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue-Adventist Health System/Sunbelt Obligated Group, Series C (RB) |
|
| 278,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 534,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Kentucky: 0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Kentucky Asset/Liability Commission, University of Kentucky Project Notes, Series B (RB) |
|
| 270,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| Louisville & Jefferson County, Kentucky Metro Government Health, Jewish Hospital & Saint Mary’s Health Care (RB) |
| $ | 267,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 538,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Louisiana: 1.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, 19th Judicial District Court (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 262,617 |
|
400,000 |
| Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Ochsner Clinic Foundation Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 389,208 |
|
250,000 |
| St. John, Louisiana Marathon Oil Corp. Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 248,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 899,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Maryland: 1.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Frederick County, Maryland Urbana Community Development Authority, Series A (ST) |
|
| 504,930 |
|
500,000 |
| Maryland State Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Johns Hopkins University, Series A (RB) |
|
| 545,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,050,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Massachusetts: 3.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 289,380 |
|
500,000 |
| Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Boston College Issue, Series P (RB) |
|
| 523,005 |
|
500,000 |
| Massachusetts State College Building Authority, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 521,185 |
|
150,000 |
| Massachusetts State Consolidated Loan, Series B (GO) |
|
| 165,852 |
|
250,000 |
| Massachusetts State Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Caregroup, Series E-1 (RB) |
|
| 255,957 |
|
500,000 |
| Massachusetts State School Building Authority, Dedicated Sales Tax, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 532,745 |
|
500,000 |
| Massachusetts State Water Resource Authority, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 503,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,791,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
33
|
LONG MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Michigan: 1.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| Detroit, Michigan Water Supply System, Senior Lien, Series C (RB) (AGM) |
| $ | 245,657 |
|
250,000 |
| Michigan State Building Authority (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 94,730 |
|
225,000 |
| Michigan State Building Authority, Series I (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 229,937 |
|
250,000 |
| Michigan State Hospital Financing Authority, Henry Ford Health System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 249,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 820,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Missouri: 1.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
460,000 |
| Missouri State Health & Educational Facilities, Series A (RB) |
|
| 471,081 |
|
250,000 |
| Missouri State Health & Educational Facilities, Series A (RB) |
|
| 254,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 725,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Montana: 0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Montana Facility Finance Authority, Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health System (RB) |
|
| 504,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Nebraska: 0.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Nebraska Public Power District, Series C (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 256,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New Hampshire: 0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| New Hampshire Municipal Bond Bank, Series B (RB) |
|
| 534,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New Jersey: 4.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority - School Facilities, Series U (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 519,890 |
|
750,000 |
| New Jersey Environmental Infrastructure Trust, Series A (RB) |
|
| 775,455 |
|
625,000 |
| New Jersey State (GO) |
|
| 756,219 |
|
500,000 |
| New Jersey State Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. (RB) |
|
| 361,435 |
|
500,000 |
| New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Series A (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 553,345 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 270,910 |
|
915,000 |
| New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 350,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,588,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Mexico: 0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| New Mexico Hospital Equipment Loan Council, Presbyterian Healthcare Services, Series A (RB) |
| $ | 522,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New York: 14.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
125,000 |
| Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp. New York, Series A (RB) |
|
| 124,783 |
|
750,000 |
| Liberty New York Development Corp., Goldman Sachs Headquarters (RB) |
|
| 778,687 |
|
250,000 |
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York Dedicated Tax Fund, Series B (RB) |
|
| 266,063 |
|
250,000 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency - Yankee Stadium (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 250,233 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water & Sewer System, Series DD (RB) |
|
| 511,965 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water & Sewer System, Series FF-2 (RB) |
|
| 528,275 |
|
250,000 |
| New York City Refunding, Series G (GO) |
|
| 264,225 |
|
250,000 |
| New York Convention Center Development Corp., Hotel Unit Fee Secured (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 253,210 |
|
250,000 |
| New York Convention Center Development Corp., Hotel Unit Fee Secured (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 253,548 |
|
750,000 |
| New York Liberty Development Corp., Bank of America Tower at One Bryant Park Project, Second Priority Liberty (RB) |
|
| 756,240 |
|
350,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Columbia University (RB) |
|
| 384,079 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Columbia University, Series A (RB) |
|
| 541,605 |
|
250,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, FIT Student Housing Corp. (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 264,065 |
|
250,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Non State Supported Debt, Hudson Valley Hospital Center (RB) (AGM) (FHA) |
|
| 257,220 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series D (RB) |
|
| 533,705 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
New York: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$470,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series F (RB) |
| $ | 499,671 |
|
325,000 |
| New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., State Clean Water & Drinking Water, Pooled Financing Program (RB) |
|
| 407,660 |
|
375,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Series G (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 398,651 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Urban Development Corp., Series A (RB) |
|
| 545,550 |
|
250,000 |
| New York State Urban Development Corp., Series A (RB) |
|
| 275,753 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Urban Development Corp., Series A (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 525,270 |
|
500,000 |
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, Series 160 (RB) |
|
| 503,490 |
|
795,000 |
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, Series 163 (RB) |
|
| 797,472 |
|
500,000 |
| Troy, New York Capital Resource Corp., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 519,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 10,441,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
North Carolina: 1.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Charlotte, North Carolina NASCAR Hall of Fame Facilities, Series C (CP) |
|
| 261,888 |
|
250,000 |
| Charlotte, North Carolina Water & Sewer System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 267,372 |
|
500,000 |
| North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities, Series A (RB) |
|
| 515,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,044,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oklahoma: 1.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Oklahoma Development Finance Authority, St. John Health System (RB) |
|
| 248,415 |
|
500,000 |
| Tulsa County, Oklahoma Industrial Authority, St. Francis Health System (RB) |
|
| 500,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 748,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oregon: 0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
800,000 |
| Marion & Polk Counties, Oregon Salem-Keizer School District No.24, Series B (GO) (SBG) |
|
| 362,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pennsylvania: 1.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
$325,000 |
| Delaware River Port Authority, Series D (RB) |
| $ | 335,839 |
|
250,000 |
| Pennsylvania State Higher Education (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 251,542 |
|
250,000 |
| Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission, Sub-Series A (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 256,300 |
|
250,000 |
| Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission, Sub-Series B (RB) |
|
| 259,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,103,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Puerto Rico: 1.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Puerto Rico Commonwealth Infrastructure Financing Authority, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 28,958 |
|
250,000 |
| Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series VV (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 271,175 |
|
250,000 |
| Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority, Capital Fund Modernization Program (RB) |
|
| 262,722 |
|
285,000 |
| Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sub-Series A (RB) |
|
| 303,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 865,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
South Carolina: 2.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
350,000 |
| Berkeley County, South Carolina School District, Securing Assets for Education (RB) |
|
| 361,130 |
|
250,000 |
| Kershaw County, South Carolina Public School Foundation (RB) (CIFG) |
|
| 254,445 |
|
500,000 |
| South Carolina Public Service Authority, Series A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 520,240 |
|
500,000 |
| South Carolina Transportation Infrastructure Bank, Series B (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 509,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,645,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Tennessee: 0.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
425,000 |
| Rutherford County, Tennessee Health & Educational Facilities Board, Ascension Health Senior Credit Group, Series C (RB) |
|
| 445,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Texas: 10.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Waco Texas Education Finance Corp., Baylor University, Series C (RB) |
|
| 261,365 |
|
250,000 |
| Alamo, Texas Community College District (GO) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 252,900 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
35
|
LONG MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| Dallas, Texas Area Rapid Transportation, Senior Lien (RB) (AMBAC) |
| $ | 264,468 |
|
250,000 |
| Dallas, Texas Area Rapid Transportation, Senior Lien (RB) |
|
| 266,933 |
|
500,000 |
| Dallas, Texas Waterworks & Sewer System Improvement (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 529,390 |
|
250,000 |
| Denton, Texas Independent School District, School Building (GO) |
|
| 273,245 |
|
250,000 |
| El Paso County, Texas Hospital District, Series A (GO) (AGO) |
|
| 267,427 |
|
500,000 |
| El Paso, Texas Independent School District, School Building (GO) |
|
| 543,025 |
|
250,000 |
| Fort Bend, Texas Independent School District (GO) |
|
| 277,682 |
|
500,000 |
| Harris County, Texas Toll Road-Senior Lien, Series A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 529,795 |
|
500,000 |
| Houston, Texas Combined Utility System, First Lien (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 516,140 |
|
250,000 |
| Houston, Texas Combined Utility System, First Lien Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 272,222 |
|
500,000 |
| Houston, Texas Higher Education Finance Corp., Rice University Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 536,025 |
|
500,000 |
| Houston, Texas Higher Education Finance Corp., Rice University Project, Series B (RB) |
|
| 506,310 |
|
500,000 |
| Houston, Texas Public Improvement Refunding, Series A (GO) |
|
| 541,285 |
|
500,000 |
| North Texas Thruway Authority (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 126,735 |
|
500,000 |
| North Texas Tollway Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 532,815 |
|
250,000 |
| Prosper, Texas Independent School District, School Building (GO) |
|
| 265,038 |
|
250,000 |
| SA Energy Acquisition Public Facility Corp. (RB) |
|
| 271,467 |
|
225,000 |
| Texas A&M University, Permanent University, Series A (RB) |
|
| 267,561 |
|
500,000 |
| Texas Transportation Commission, Mobility Fund, Series A (GO) |
|
| 511,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 7,813,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia: 2.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Senior Series B-1 (RB) |
| $ | 351,980 |
|
195,000 |
| Virginia College Building Authority, Regent University (RB) |
|
| 185,279 |
|
570,000 |
| Virginia College Building Authority, Series A (RB) (SAW) |
|
| 602,906 |
|
500,000 |
| Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, Sentara Health Care Facilities (RB) |
|
| 526,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,666,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Washington: 2.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
300,000 |
| NJB Properties Lease, King County Washington Project, Series A (RB) |
|
| 312,747 |
|
250,000 |
| Port of Seattle, Washington, Series A (RB) |
|
| 274,582 |
|
250,000 |
| Seattle, Washington Solid Waste Revenue & Refunding (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 267,383 |
|
500,000 |
| Seattle, Washington Water System Improvement & Refunding (RB) |
|
| 545,595 |
|
500,000 |
| Snohomish County, Washington Limited Tax, Series A (GO) |
|
| 487,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,887,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Municipal Bonds |
|
| 71,757,267 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Investments: 98.7% |
|
| 71,757,267 |
| ||
Other assets less liabilities: 1.3% |
|
| 970,082 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
NET ASSETS: 100.0% |
| $ | 72,727,349 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
36
|
|
|
|
AGM |
| Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. |
AGO |
| Assured Guaranty Ltd. |
AMBAC |
| American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. |
CIFG |
| CDC Ixis Financial Guaranty |
CP |
| Certificate of Participation |
FGIC |
| Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. |
FHA |
| Federal Housing Association |
GO |
| General Obligation |
NATL |
| National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
RB |
| Revenue Bond |
SAW |
| State Aid Withholding |
SBG |
| School Board Guaranteed |
ST |
| Special Tax |
|
|
(a) | Callable Security - the redemption date shown is when the security may be redeemed by the issuer |
(b) | Zero Coupon Bond - the rate shown is the effective yield at purchase date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of Investments By Sector (unaudited) |
|
| % of |
| Value |
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||||
Airport |
|
| 0.7 | % |
| $ | 504,860 |
| |
Bond Bank |
|
| 1.8 |
|
|
| 1,295,464 |
| |
Development |
|
| 3.6 |
|
|
| 2,556,183 |
| |
Education |
|
| 1.9 |
|
|
| 1,397,745 |
| |
Facilities |
|
| 9.1 |
|
|
| 6,566,900 |
| |
General Obligation |
|
| 20.0 |
|
|
| 14,319,649 |
| |
Higher Education |
| �� | 11.5 |
|
|
| 8,223,264 |
| |
Housing |
|
| 0.3 |
|
|
| 254,760 |
| |
Medical |
|
| 14.8 |
|
|
| 10,634,767 |
| |
Multifamily Housing |
|
| 0.4 |
|
|
| 262,723 |
| |
Nursing Homes |
|
| 1.8 |
|
|
| 1,292,055 |
| |
Pollution |
|
| 2.3 |
|
|
| 1,657,533 |
| |
Power |
|
| 2.9 |
|
|
| 2,071,685 |
| |
School District |
|
| 4.7 |
|
|
| 3,405,621 |
| |
Single Family Housing |
|
| 0.4 |
|
|
| 260,615 |
| |
Tobacco Settlement |
|
| 1.5 |
|
|
| 1,072,825 |
| |
Transportation |
|
| 12.3 |
|
|
| 8,807,914 |
| |
Utilities |
|
| 2.3 |
|
|
| 1,667,499 |
| |
Water |
|
| 7.7 |
|
|
| 5,505,205 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| 100.0 | % |
| $ | 71,757,267 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of October 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Value |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total Municipal Bonds* |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 71,757,267 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 71,757,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* See Schedule of Investments for security type and geographic sector breakouts.
See Notes to Financial Statements
37
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MUNICIPAL BONDS: 98.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
Alabama: 2.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| Birmingham, Alabama Waterworks & Sewer Board, Series B (RB) (NATL) |
| $ | 274,035 |
|
500,000 |
| Birmingham, Alabama, Series B (GO) (AMBAC) |
|
| 546,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 820,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Arizona: 3.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,000,000 |
| Arizona School Facilities Board, Series A (CP) (NATL) |
|
| 1,109,290 |
|
125,000 |
| Arizona School Facilities Board, State School Improvement (RB) |
|
| 135,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,244,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
California: 16.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,550,000 |
| California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bay Area Toll Bridges, First Lien Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 1,906,887 |
|
250,000 |
| California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bay Area Toll Bridges, First Lien Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 265,513 |
|
250,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 261,813 |
|
875,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 995,951 |
|
250,000 |
| California Water Resources Department Power Supply, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 271,235 |
|
350,000 |
| Clovis California Unified School District, Election 2004-Series A (GO) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 277,071 |
|
500,000 |
| Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency California, Senior Lien Series A (RB) |
|
| 387,910 |
|
250,000 |
| Los Angeles Unified School District, Election 2002-Series A (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 280,782 |
|
450,000 |
| Los Angeles Unified School District, Election 2002-Series A (GO) (NATL) |
|
| 506,893 |
|
250,000 |
| Sacramento County, California Sanitation District Financing Authority, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 290,730 |
|
500,000 |
| Southern California Tobacco Securitization Authority, Asset Backed, Series B (RB) |
|
| 543,995 |
|
250,000 |
| University of California, Multiple Purpose Projects, Series Q (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 262,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 6,251,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado: 0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| Colorado Department of Transportation Revenue (RB) |
| $ | 272,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Florida: 1.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Collier County, Florida School Board (CP) (AGM) |
|
| 265,938 |
|
250,000 |
| Orange County, Florida Tourist Development Tax Revenue (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 267,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 533,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Georgia: 2.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Georgia State Series D (GO) |
|
| 261,762 |
|
500,000 |
| Georgia State, Series B (GO) |
|
| 535,635 |
|
250,000 |
| Georgia State, Series D (GO) |
|
| 287,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,084,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Hawaii: 1.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Hawaii State Series CX (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 531,685 |
|
150,000 |
| Hawaii State Series CZ (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 161,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 693,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Illinois: 8.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, Greater Chicago (GO) |
|
| 601,610 |
|
500,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, Series C (GO) |
|
| 550,980 |
|
500,000 |
| Cook County School District, Series B (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 534,190 |
|
750,000 |
| Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, Senior Priority Series A-1 (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 895,545 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, Senior Priority Series A-2 (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 597,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,179,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Kentucky: 0.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Kentucky State Property & Buildings Commission, No. 85 (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 293,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Maryland: 1.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Maryland State & Local Facilities Loan, Capital Improvement, First Series A (GO) |
|
| 583,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Massachusetts: 4.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
650,000 |
| Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 763,893 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| Massachusetts State Consolidated Loan, Series C (GO) |
| $ | 295,330 |
|
500,000 |
| Massachusetts State Water Resources Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 613,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,672,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Michigan: 3.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
450,000 |
| Detroit, Michigan City School District, Wayne County School Building & Site Improvement, Series A (GO) (AGM) (Q-SBLF) |
|
| 482,476 |
|
250,000 |
| Detroit, Michigan Sewer Disposal, Senior Lien Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 278,783 |
|
500,000 |
| Detroit, Michigan Water Supply System Revenue, Second Lien-Series B (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 560,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,321,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Minnesota: 1.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota Health Care System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 276,787 |
|
400,000 |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota Health Care System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 435,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 712,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Nevada: 1.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
410,000 |
| Clark County, Nevada School District, Series D (GO) (NATL) |
|
| 464,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New Jersey: 22.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Garden State Preservation Trust, Open Space & Farmland Preservation, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 284,207 |
|
500,000 |
| Garden State Preservation Trust, Open Space & Farmland Preservation, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 568,415 |
|
350,000 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, School Facilities Construction, Series F (RB) (FGIC) |
|
| 391,895 |
|
375,000 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, School Facilities Construction, Series F (RB) |
|
| 417,979 |
|
585,000 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, School Facilities Construction, Series G (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 657,411 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, School Facilities Construction, Series I (RB) |
|
| 1,164,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Series A (RB) |
| $ | 603,620 |
|
500,000 |
| New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Series C (RB) (FGIC) |
|
| 592,405 |
|
500,000 |
| New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Series C (RB) (FGIC) |
|
| 592,405 |
|
600,000 |
| New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Series D (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 702,684 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Asset Backed (RB) |
|
| 1,089,950 |
|
1,425,000 |
| New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Transportation System, Series A (RB) (FGIC) |
|
| 1,536,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 8,602,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New York: 3.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
525,000 |
| New York City, Series G (GO) |
|
| 573,772 |
|
285,000 |
| New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Dedicated Tax, Series A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 363,056 |
|
250,000 |
| New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Transit Facilities Service Contract, Series 8 (RB) |
|
| 281,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,218,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
North Carolina: 1.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
100,000 |
| Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, North Carolina Health Care, Series A (RB) |
|
| 116,410 |
|
500,000 |
| North Carolina Municipal Power Agency No. 1 (RB) |
|
| 605,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 721,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Ohio: 4.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Cincinnati, Ohio City School District Classroom Facilities Construction & Improvement (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 565,675 |
|
500,000 |
| Cincinnati, Ohio City School District Classroom Facilities Construction & Improvement (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 569,475 |
|
250,000 |
| Cleveland, Ohio Waterworks, Series K (RB) (FGIC) |
|
| 264,060 |
|
185,000 |
| Ohio State Water Development Authority, Fresh Water Improvement (RB) |
|
| 211,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,611,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
39
|
PRE-REFUNDED MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oregon: 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$250,000 |
| Deschutes County, Oregon Hospital Facilities Authority, Cascade Health Services, Inc. (RB) |
| $ | 264,495 |
|
250,000 |
| Oregon State Department Transportation Highway User Tax, Series A (RB) |
|
| 273,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 538,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pennsylvania: 3.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Pennsylvania State Public School Building Authority, Philadelphia School District (RB) (AGM) (SAW) |
|
| 555,780 |
|
500,000 |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania School District, Series B (GO) (FGIC) (SAW) |
|
| 543,990 |
|
250,000 |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Water & Wastewater, Series A (RB) (FGIC) |
|
| 273,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,373,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Puerto Rico: 2.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
955,000 |
| Puerto Rico Commonwealth, Public Improvement, Series A (GO) |
|
| 1,067,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Rhode Island: 1.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Rhode Island Health & Educational Building Corp., Lifespan Obligated Group (RB) |
|
| 551,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
South Carolina: 1.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
325,000 |
| Greenville, South Carolina, Building Equity Sooner For Tomorrow, Installment Purchase (RB) |
|
| 365,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee: 0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| City of Memphis, Tennessee Electric System, Series A (RB) (NATL) |
| $ | 282,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Texas: 1.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Dallas, Texas Waterworks & Sewer System (RB) |
|
| 281,462 |
|
250,000 |
| Harris County, Texas Senior Lien-Toll Road (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 271,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 553,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Utah: 1.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Utah State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 270,053 |
|
250,000 |
| Utah Transit Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, Series B (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 293,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 563,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Wisconsin: 2.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Wisconsin Health & Education Facilities Authority, Wheaton Franciscan Services, Inc. (RB) |
|
| 269,452 |
|
500,000 |
| Wisconsin State Transportation, Series 1 (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 543,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 813,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Municipal Bonds |
|
| 37,390,653 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Investments: 98.6% |
|
| 37,390,653 |
| ||
Other assets less liabilities: 1.4% |
|
| 522,961 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
NET ASSETS: 100.0% |
| $ | 37,913,614 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
AGM | Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. |
AMBAC | American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. |
CP | Certificate of Participation |
FGIC | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. |
GO | General Obligation |
NATL | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
Q-SBLF | Qualified School Board Loan Fund |
RB | Revenue Bond |
SAW | State Aid Withholding |
|
|
(a) | Callable Security - the redemption date shown is when the security may be redeemed by the issuer |
(b) | Zero Coupon Bond - the rate shown is the effective yield at purchase date |
See Notes to Financial Statements
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of Investments By Sector (unaudited) |
| % of |
| Value |
| |||
|
|
| ||||||
Development |
| 2.3 | % |
| $ | 852,622 |
| |
Education |
| 8.4 |
|
|
| 3,132,550 |
| |
Facilities |
| 1.5 |
|
|
| 561,895 |
| |
General Obligation |
| 20.1 |
|
|
| 7,525,554 |
| |
Higher Education |
| 1.0 |
|
|
| 378,633 |
| |
Medical |
| 4.8 |
|
|
| 1,797,343 |
| |
Power |
| 3.1 |
|
|
| 1,159,240 |
| |
School District |
| 16.5 |
|
|
| 6,156,086 |
| |
Tobacco Settlement |
| 4.4 |
|
|
| 1,633,945 |
| |
Transportation |
| 29.8 |
|
|
| 11,144,508 |
| |
Water |
| 8.1 |
|
|
| 3,048,277 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 100.0 | % |
| $ | 37,390,653 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of October 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Value |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total Municipal Bonds* |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 37,390,653 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 37,390,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* See Schedule of Investments for security type and geographic sector breakouts.
See Notes to Financial Statements
41
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
MUNICIPAL BONDS: 98.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
Alabama: 0.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Alabama State Public School & College Authority, Capital Improvement Bond (RB) |
| $ | 588,195 |
|
250,000 |
| Alabama State Public School & College Authority, Capital Improvement Bond (RB) |
|
| 261,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 849,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Arizona: 2.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Arizona State Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District, Series B (RB) |
|
| 561,585 |
|
250,000 |
| Arizona State School Facilities Board, Series A-1 (CP) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 275,943 |
|
750,000 |
| Arizona State Transportation Board Excise Tax Revenue, Maricopa County, Regional Area Road Fund (RB) |
|
| 869,565 |
|
250,000 |
| Arizona State Transportation Board Excise Tax Revenue, Maricopa County, Regional Area Road Fund (RB) |
|
| 284,600 |
|
575,000 |
| Arizona State Water Infrastructure Finance Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 662,756 |
|
305,000 |
| Maricopa County, Arizona Community College District, Series C (GO) |
|
| 337,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,991,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
California: 12.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Alameda, California Corridor Transportation Authority, Sub Lien, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 225,015 |
|
250,000 |
| Bay Area Infrastructure Financing Authority (RB) (XLCA) |
|
| 255,208 |
|
100,000 |
| Bay Area Infrastructure Financing Authority (RB) (XLCA) |
|
| 100,215 |
|
500,000 |
| Bay Area Infrastructure Financing Authority (RB) (XLCA) |
|
| 500,715 |
|
1,000,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 1,144,690 |
|
600,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 667,494 |
|
500,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 571,355 |
|
250,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 281,057 |
|
250,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 277,625 |
|
175,000 |
| California State (GO) |
|
| 200,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
California: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| California State Public Works Board, Series J (RB) (AMBAC) |
| $ | 545,165 |
|
500,000 |
| California State Public Works Board, Series J (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 536,015 |
|
250,000 |
| California State University Systemwide, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 280,215 |
|
1,000,000 |
| California Statewide Communities Development Authority (RB) |
|
| 1,090,810 |
|
500,000 |
| California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 546,520 |
|
250,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Metropolitan Transit Authority Sales Tax Refunding, 2nd Senior Series A (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 268,585 |
|
250,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Public Works Financing Authority, Regional Park & Open Space District, Series A (NATL) (SA) |
|
| 279,385 |
|
710,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Unified School District, Election 2005, Series C (GO) (AMBAC) |
|
| 801,980 |
|
500,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Unified School District, Information Technology Projects, Series A (CP) (AMBAC) |
|
| 560,125 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Los Angeles, California Unified School District, Series B (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 1,163,860 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Oakland Joint Powers Financing Authority, Series A-1 (RB) (AGO) |
|
| 1,151,700 |
|
500,000 |
| Regents of University of California Medical Center, Series D (RB) |
|
| 555,620 |
|
500,000 |
| Riverside County, California State Public Safety Communication Project, Series A (CP) (AMBAC) |
|
| 555,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 12,558,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Connecticut: 6.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,010,000 |
| Connecticut State Economic Recovery, Series A (GO) |
|
| 1,135,725 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Connecticut State Economic Recovery, Series A (GO) |
|
| 1,038,930 |
|
500,000 |
| Connecticut State Economic Recovery, Series A (GO) |
|
| 586,045 |
|
975,000 |
| Connecticut State Economic Recovery, Series A (GO) |
|
| 1,026,548 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Connecticut: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$260,000 |
| Connecticut State Economic Recovery, Series A (GO) |
| $ | 284,053 |
|
500,000 |
| Connecticut State Economic Recovery, Series A (GO) |
|
| 546,720 |
|
400,000 |
| Connecticut State Health & Educational Facility Authority, Yale University, Series A-4 (RB) |
|
| 462,244 |
|
250,000 |
| Connecticut State Special Tax Obligation, Transportation Infrastructure, Series A (NATL) (ST) |
|
| 283,635 |
|
500,000 |
| Connecticut State, Series B (GO) |
|
| 579,800 |
|
250,000 |
| Connecticut State, Series B (GO) |
|
| 283,795 |
|
500,000 |
| Connecticut State, Series C (GO) |
|
| 592,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 6,819,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Delaware: 0.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Delaware State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 282,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
District of Columbia: 0.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Washington D.C. Convention Center Authority Dedicated Tax, Senior Lien, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 266,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Florida: 6.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Citizens Property Insurance Corp., Senior Secured High Risk Account - A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 532,405 |
|
750,000 |
| Citizens Property Insurance Corp., Senior Secured High Risk Account - A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 787,253 |
|
250,000 |
| Citizens Property Insurance Corp., Senior Secured High Risk Account - A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 260,140 |
|
1,050,000 |
| City of Jacksonville, Florida, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,212,046 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp., Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,095,470 |
|
250,000 |
| Florida State Board of Education Lottery, Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 275,080 |
|
475,000 |
| Florida State Board of Education Lottery, Series E (RB) |
|
| 550,900 |
|
250,000 |
| Florida State Board of Education, Public Education Capital Outlay, Series A (GO) |
|
| 288,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Florida: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$975,000 |
| Florida State Board of Education, Public Education Capital Outlay, Series C (GO) |
| $ | 1,114,717 |
|
250,000 |
| Hillsborough County, Florida Community Investment Tax (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 278,095 |
|
250,000 |
| Hillsborough County, Florida Industrial Development (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 260,985 |
|
250,000 |
| Miami-Dade County, Florida School Board, Series A (CP) (AMBAC) |
|
| 264,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 6,919,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Georgia: 1.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Augusta, Georgia Water & Sewerage Refunding (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 278,618 |
|
450,000 |
| Georgia State Road & Tollway Authority (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 520,501 |
|
250,000 |
| Georgia State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 294,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,093,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Hawaii: 1.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
375,000 |
| Hawaii State, Series DJ (GO) (AMBAC) |
|
| 434,640 |
|
750,000 |
| Honolulu, Hawaii City and County, Series B (GO) (FSA) |
|
| 859,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,294,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Illinois: 9.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
100,000 |
| Chicago Housing Authority (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 108,466 |
|
750,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois Transit Authority, Capital Grant Receipts, Section 5309 (RB) |
|
| 823,485 |
|
250,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois, Board of Education, Series D (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 275,583 |
|
250,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois, O’Hare International Airport, 3rd Lien, Series B (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 279,942 |
|
250,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois, O’Hare International Airport, Passenger Facility Charge, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 279,582 |
|
125,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois, O’Hare International Airport, Passenger Facility Charge, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 137,600 |
|
250,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois, Series A (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 276,665 |
|
800,000 |
| Chicago, Illinois, Transportation Authority, Capital Grant (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 863,976 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
43
|
SHORT MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Illinois: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| Dupage County, Illinois, Transportation Revenue (RB) (AGM) |
| $ | 279,547 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois Finance Authority, Resurrection Health Care Corp. (RB) |
|
| 534,865 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois State (GO) |
|
| 541,235 |
|
220,000 |
| Illinois State (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 241,215 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Illinois State (GO) |
|
| 1,100,460 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois State (GO) |
|
| 548,470 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois State (GO) (AGM) |
|
| 548,885 |
|
250,000 |
| Illinois State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 268,683 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 520,545 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 516,030 |
|
250,000 |
| Illinois State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 255,260 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 518,210 |
|
500,000 |
| Illinois State, Series B (GO) |
|
| 548,470 |
|
300,000 |
| Illinois State, Series B (GO) |
|
| 319,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 9,786,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Kentucky: 0.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
100,000 |
| Kentucky State Property & Buildings Commission (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 104,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Louisiana: 0.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
300,000 |
| Louisiana State Citizen’s Property Insurance Corp., Series B (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 327,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Maryland: 1.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Anne Arundel County, Maryland Consolidated General Improvement (GO) |
|
| 566,875 |
|
500,000 |
| Maryland State Transportation Authority (RB) |
|
| 596,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,163,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Massachusetts: 2.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
100,000 |
| Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 116,581 |
|
500,000 |
| Massachusetts School Building Authority, Sales Tax, Series A (RB) |
|
| 581,185 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Massachusetts State Commonwealth, Loan Series A (GO) |
|
| 1,134,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Massachusetts: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| Massachusetts State, Series B (GO) |
| $ | 278,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,110,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Michigan: 2.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Detroit, Michigan City School District, School Building and Site Improvement (GO) (AGM) (Q-SBLF) |
|
| 274,405 |
|
1,145,000 |
| Detroit, Michigan Sewage Disposal System, Senior Lien, Series C (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 1,275,015 |
|
500,000 |
| Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Ascension Health Senior Credit Group, Series B (RB) |
|
| 576,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,125,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Minnesota: 2.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,000,000 |
| Hennepin County, Minneapolis, Series B (GO) |
|
| 1,116,600 |
|
500,000 |
| Minnesota State (GO) |
|
| 517,730 |
|
500,000 |
| Minnesota State, Series F (GO) |
|
| 545,340 |
|
500,000 |
| Minnesota State, Series H (GO) |
|
| 578,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,758,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Mississippi: 0.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
750,000 |
| Madison County, Mississippi Development Bank, Highway Construction Project (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 865,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Missouri: 0.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
300,000 |
| Kansas City Municipal Assistance Corp., H. Roe Bartle Convention Center, Series A (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 338,679 |
|
515,000 |
| Mississippi Highways & Transportation Commission, Series A (RB) |
|
| 538,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 877,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Nebraska: 0.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Central Plains Energy Project, Nebraska Gas Project No. 1, Series A (RB) |
|
| 268,455 |
|
250,000 |
| Nebraska Public Power District, Series B (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 278,965 |
|
250,000 |
| Nebraska Public Power District, Series B (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 271,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 818,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Nevada: 0.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| Clark County, Nevada School District, Series B (GO) |
| $ | 279,750 |
|
250,000 |
| Clark County, Nevada School District, Series B (GO) |
|
| 273,582 |
|
250,000 |
| Henderson, Nevada Health Care Facilities, Catholic Health Care West, Series C (RB) |
|
| 259,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 812,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New Jersey: 5.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,000,000 |
| Hudson County, New Jersey (GO) (CIFG) |
|
| 1,126,100 |
|
600,000 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Cigarette Tax (RB) (FGIC) |
|
| 626,112 |
|
475,000 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, School Facilities Construction, Series O (RB) |
|
| 540,588 |
|
500,000 |
| New Jersey Higher Education Assistance Authority, Student Loan, Series 1A (RB) |
|
| 551,970 |
|
370,000 |
| New Jersey State, Series N (GO) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 414,448 |
|
500,000 |
| New Jersey State, Series O (GO) |
|
| 578,350 |
|
1,085,000 |
| New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Series A (RB) (FGIC) (NATL) |
|
| 1,208,441 |
|
750,000 |
| New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Transportation System, Series A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 853,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 5,899,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New York: 19.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Series A (RB) |
|
| 275,615 |
|
575,000 |
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Series B (RB) |
|
| 639,526 |
|
350,000 |
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Series C-2 (RB) |
|
| 382,970 |
|
240,000 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency, Yankee Stadium (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 258,876 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Sub Series A-1 (RB) |
|
| 556,885 |
|
750,000 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Sub Series A-1 (RB) |
|
| 867,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
| Value |
| ||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Sub Series D (RB) |
| $ | 584,695 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Sub Series D (RB) |
|
| 544,700 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Sub Series E (RB) |
|
| 1,071,620 |
|
250,000 |
| New York City, Series A-1 (GO) |
|
| 264,728 |
|
1,500,000 |
| New York City, Series E (GO) |
|
| 1,732,080 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City, Series E (GO) |
|
| 550,140 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City, Series K (GO) |
|
| 555,585 |
|
500,000 |
| New York City, Series K (GO) |
|
| 550,140 |
|
340,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, City University System, Series A (RB) |
|
| 373,867 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Consolidated Service Contract, Series A (RB) |
|
| 537,510 |
|
250,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series A (RB) |
|
| 283,377 |
|
1,600,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series A (RB) |
|
| 1,685,072 |
|
250,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series B (RB) |
|
| 275,498 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series C (RB) |
|
| 580,240 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series D (RB) |
|
| 556,200 |
|
1,000,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series E (RB) |
|
| 1,153,650 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series G (RB) |
|
| 577,130 |
|
725,000 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Tax, Series C (RB) |
|
| 793,599 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
45
|
SHORT MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$250,000 |
| New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., State Personal Income, Series A (RB) |
| $ | 283,165 |
|
475,000 |
| New York State Local Government Assistance Corp., Senior Lien, Series C (RB) |
|
| 524,348 |
|
250,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, General Revenue, Series H (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 277,485 |
|
250,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, General Revenue, Series H (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 269,923 |
|
250,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Second General Highway & Bridge Trust Fund, Series A (RB) |
|
| 255,965 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Second General Highway & Bridge Trust Fund, Series A (RB) |
|
| 564,925 |
|
125,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Second General Highway & Bridge Trust Fund, Series A (RB) |
|
| 137,670 |
|
200,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Second General Highway & Bridge Trust Fund, Series A (RB) |
|
| 224,298 |
|
450,000 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, State Personal Income Tax, Series A (RB) |
|
| 519,417 |
|
260,000 |
| New York State Urban Development Corp., Service Contract, Series A (RB) |
|
| 289,437 |
|
250,000 |
| New York State Urban Development Corp., State Personal Income Tax, Series A-1 (RB) |
|
| 273,655 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State Urban Development Corp., State Personal Income Tax, Series C (RB) |
|
| 566,330 |
|
500,000 |
| New York State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 535,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 20,373,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
North Carolina: 2.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
325,000 |
| North Carolina State, Series A (GO) 5.00%, 03/01/15 |
|
| 378,872 |
|
810,000 |
| North Carolina, Capital Improvement, Series A (RB) |
|
| 933,914 |
|
450,000 |
| North Carolina, Infrastructure Financing Corp., Series A (CP) |
|
| 507,159 |
|
250,000 |
| North Carolina, Infrastructure Financing Corp., Series A (CP) (AGM) |
|
| 283,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
North Carolina: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Wake County, North Carolina, Series D (GO) |
| $ | 559,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,663,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Ohio: 3.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Columbus, Ohio State, Series D (GO) |
|
| 578,925 |
|
400,000 |
| Hamilton County, Ohio Sales Tax, Subordinate Series A (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 446,412 |
|
250,000 |
| Ohio State Common Schools, Series D (GO) |
|
| 278,940 |
|
750,000 |
| Ohio State Department of Administrative Services, Series A (CP) (NATL) |
|
| 825,465 |
|
300,000 |
| Ohio State Highway Capital Improvement, Series J (GO) |
|
| 330,507 |
|
250,000 |
| Ohio State Major New State Infrastructure Project, Series 2007-1 (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 284,570 |
|
250,000 |
| Ohio State University, Series A (RB) |
|
| 281,370 |
|
250,000 |
| Ohio State, Series C (GO) |
|
| 291,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,317,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pennsylvania: 3.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
400,000 |
| Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Hospital Development Authority, Pittsburgh University Medical Center, Series A (RB) |
|
| 448,588 |
|
400,000 |
| Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Hospital Development Authority, Pittsburgh University Medical Center, Series A (RB) |
|
| 442,484 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Pennsylvania State Commonwealth, First Series (GO) |
|
| 1,163,810 |
|
850,000 |
| Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission, Registration Fee Revenue, Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 970,793 |
|
500,000 |
| Philadelphia Pennsylvania Gas Works, Seventh Series (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 553,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,579,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Puerto Rico: 4.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Puerto Rico Commonwealth Infrastructure Financing Authority, Series C (RB) (AMBAC) |
|
| 272,422 |
|
250,000 |
| Puerto Rico Commonwealth, Government Development, Series B (RB) |
|
| 272,662 |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Puerto Rico: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Puerto Rico Commonwealth, Government Development, Series B (RB) |
| $ | 548,490 |
|
250,000 |
| Puerto Rico Commonwealth, Public Improvement, Series A (GO) |
|
| 287,710 |
|
750,000 |
| Puerto Rico Commonwealth, Public Improvement, Series A (GO) (AGO) |
|
| 831,990 |
|
425,000 |
| Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series QQ (RB) (XLCA) |
|
| 472,404 |
|
200,000 |
| Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series SS (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 220,554 |
|
75,000 |
| Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series UU (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 80,077 |
|
250,000 |
| Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Government Facilities, Series J (RB) (COMWLTH GTD) |
|
| 260,433 |
|
300,000 |
| Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Government Facilities, Series M (RB) (COMWLTH GTD) |
|
| 335,208 |
|
575,000 |
| Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sales Tax, First Sub-Series A (RB) |
|
| 595,033 |
|
250,000 |
| Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sales Tax, First Sub-Series A (RB) |
|
| 272,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 4,449,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Rhode Island: 0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Rhode Island Clean Water Finance Agency, Water Pollution Control, Series A (RB) |
|
| 555,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
South Carolina: 0.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Greenville County, South Carolina School District Installment (RB) |
|
| 261,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Texas: 2.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Houston, Texas Independent School District (GO) |
|
| 282,825 |
|
250,000 |
| Houston, Texas Utility System, Combined 1st Lien Series A (RB) (AGM) |
|
| 290,497 |
|
500,000 |
| Texas A&M University, Revenue Financing System, Series D (RB) |
|
| 534,325 |
|
250,000 |
| Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp., Senior Lien Series A (RB) |
|
| 266,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas: (continued) |
|
|
|
| ||
$500,000 |
| Texas Public Finance Authority, Series A (GO) |
| $ | 586,175 |
|
250,000 |
| Texas Transportation Commission, State Highway Fund, First Tier (RB) |
|
| 283,722 |
|
125,000 |
| Texas Transportation Commission, State Highway Fund, First Tier (RB) |
|
| 135,033 |
|
415,000 |
| Texas Water Development Board, State Revolving Fund, Sub-Series B (RB) |
|
| 484,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,862,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Virginia: 3.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
500,000 |
| Fairfax County, Virginia Public Improvement, Series A (GO) (SAW) |
|
| 569,975 |
|
125,000 |
| Loudoun County, Virginia, Series B (GO) (SAW) |
|
| 141,051 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Virginia Beach Development Authority (RB) |
|
| 1,115,030 |
|
500,000 |
| Virginia Commonwealth Transportation Board, Federal Highway Anticipation Note (RB) |
|
| 558,920 |
|
250,000 |
| Virginia Commonwealth Transportation Board, Federal Highway Anticipation Note (RB) |
|
| 270,870 |
|
500,000 |
| Virginia State, Series A (GO) |
|
| 556,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,212,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Washington: 0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
250,000 |
| Port Seattle, Washington Intermediate Lien, Series A (RB) (NATL) |
|
| 280,142 |
|
250,000 |
| Washington State (GO) |
|
| 273,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 553,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Wisconsin: 0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
525,000 |
| Wisconsin State, Series C (GO) |
|
| 553,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Municipal Bonds |
|
| 103,107,748 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Fund: 0.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
269,316 |
| Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management |
|
| 269,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Investments: 98.7% |
|
| 103,377,064 |
| ||
Other assets less liabilities: 1.3% |
|
| 1,309,948 |
| ||
|
|
| ||||
NET ASSETS: 100.0% |
| $ | 104,687,012 |
| ||
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
47
|
SHORT MUNICIPAL INDEX ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
AGM | Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. |
AGO | Assured Guaranty Ltd. |
AMBAC | American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. |
CIFG | CDC Ixis Financial Guaranty |
COMWLTH GTD | Commonwealth Guaranteed |
CP | Certificate of Participation |
FGIC | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. |
FSA | Financial Security Assurance Inc. |
GO | General Obligation |
NATL | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
Q-SBLF | Qualified School Board Loan Fund |
RB | Revenue Bond |
SA | Special Assessment |
SAW | State Aid Withholding |
ST | Special Tax |
XLCA | Syncora Guarantee, Inc. |
|
|
(a) | Zero Coupon Bond - the rate shown is the effective yield at purchase date |
(b) | Callable Security - the redemption date shown is when the security may be redeemed by the issuer |
(c) | Puttable Security - the redemption date shown is when the security may be redeemed by the investor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of Investments By Sector (unaudited) |
|
| % of |
| Value |
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||||
Airport |
|
| 0.7 | % |
| $ | 697,125 |
| |
Development |
|
| 3.0 |
|
|
| 3,120,764 |
| |
Education |
|
| 3.5 |
|
|
| 3,664,097 |
| |
Facilities |
|
| 9.3 |
|
|
| 9,637,920 |
| |
General Obligation |
|
| 41.0 |
|
|
| 42,423,819 |
| |
Higher Education |
|
| 10.5 |
|
|
| 10,827,800 |
| |
Medical |
|
| 3.8 |
|
|
| 3,898,385 |
| |
Multifamily Housing |
|
| 0.1 |
|
|
| 108,466 |
| |
Pollution |
|
| 0.5 |
|
|
| 539,080 |
| |
Power |
|
| 2.4 |
|
|
| 2,438,505 |
| |
School District |
|
| 5.4 |
|
|
| 5,590,980 |
| |
Transportation |
|
| 15.3 |
|
|
| 15,806,675 |
| |
Utilities |
|
| 0.5 |
|
|
| 534,483 |
| |
Water |
|
| 3.7 |
|
|
| 3,819,649 |
| |
Money Market Fund |
|
| 0.3 |
|
|
| 269,316 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| 100.0 | % |
| $ | 103,377,064 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of October 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Value |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Municipal Bonds* |
| $ | — |
| $ | 103,107,748 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 103,107,748 |
|
Money Market Fund |
|
| 269,316 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 269,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total |
| $ | 269,316 |
| $ | 103,107,748 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 103,377,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
* See Schedule of Investments for security type and geographic sector breakouts |
See Notes to Financial Statements
48
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| ||
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOREIGN DEBT OBLIGATIONS: 97.6% |
|
|
|
| |||
Brazil: 8.3% |
|
|
|
| |||
BRL | 3,267,000 |
| Banco do Brasil S.A. – Grand Cayman Branch |
| $ | 1,965,611 |
|
BRL | 4,761,000 |
| Brazil Letras do Tesouro Nacional |
|
| 2,297,470 |
|
|
|
| Brazil Notas do Tesouro Nacional, Series F |
|
|
|
|
BRL | 1,765,000 |
| 10.00%, 01/01/12 |
|
| 1,024,343 |
|
BRL | 1,840,000 |
| 10.00%, 01/01/13 |
|
| 1,046,921 |
|
BRL | 500,000 |
| 10.00%, 01/01/14 |
|
| 280,338 |
|
BRL | 1,200,000 |
| 10.00%, 01/01/21 |
|
| 624,054 |
|
BRL | 2,950,000 |
| Cia Energetica de Sao Paulo |
|
| 2,213,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 9,452,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Chile: 2.9% |
|
|
|
| |||
CLP | 1,519,500,000 |
| Chile Government International Bond |
|
| 3,294,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Colombia: 3.9% |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| Colombia Government International Bonds |
|
|
|
|
COP | 1,801,000,000 |
| 7.75%, 04/14/21 |
|
| 1,201,041 |
|
COP | 3,438,000,000 |
| 12.00%, 10/22/15 |
|
| 2,539,510 |
|
COP | 805,000,000 |
| Republic of Colombia |
|
| 660,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 4,400,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Egypt: 2.8% |
|
|
|
| |||
EGP | 18,680,000 |
| Egypt Government International Bond |
|
| 3,202,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Germany: 0.1% |
|
|
|
| |||
EUR | 140,000 |
| Kreditanstalt fuer Wiederaufbau |
|
| 82,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Hungary: 4.6% |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| Hungary Government Bonds |
|
|
|
|
HUF | 29,340,000 |
| 5.50%, 02/12/14 |
|
| 145,504 |
|
HUF | 310,210,000 |
| 5.50%, 02/12/16 |
|
| 1,496,410 |
|
HUF | 28,220,000 |
| 6.00%, 10/24/12 |
|
| 144,449 |
|
HUF | 121,080,000 |
| 6.50%, 06/24/19 |
|
| 599,906 |
|
HUF | 41,600,000 |
| 6.75%, 02/12/13 |
|
| 215,115 |
|
HUF | 137,910,000 |
| 6.75%, 02/24/17 |
|
| 700,794 |
|
HUF | 130,100,000 |
| 7.25%, 06/12/12 |
|
| 679,018 |
|
HUF | 92,880,000 |
| 7.50%, 10/24/13 |
|
| 488,228 |
|
HUF | 40,660,000 |
| 7.50%, 11/12/20 |
|
| 215,507 |
|
HUF | 105,000,000 |
| 8.00%, 02/12/15 |
|
| 562,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 5,247,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Indonesia: 7.2% |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| Indonesia Treasury Bonds |
|
|
|
|
IDR | 1,378,000,000 |
| 9.00%, 09/15/13 |
|
| 165,456 |
|
IDR | 6,177,000,000 |
| 9.50%, 07/15/23 |
|
| 785,107 |
|
IDR | 5,269,000,000 |
| 10.00%, 07/15/17 |
|
| 687,817 |
|
IDR | 5,067,000,000 |
| 10.00%, 02/15/28 |
|
| 659,731 |
|
IDR | 4,254,000,000 |
| 10.25%, 07/15/22 |
|
| 568,004 |
|
IDR | 9,962,000,000 |
| 10.25%, 07/15/27 |
|
| 1,312,425 |
|
IDR | 3,135,000,000 |
| 10.50%, 08/15/30 |
|
| 425,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| ||
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||
Indonesia: (continued) |
|
|
|
| |||
IDR | 3,574,000,000 |
| 10.75%, 05/15/16 |
| $ | 475,199 |
|
IDR | 1,562,000,000 |
| 11.00%, 10/15/14 |
|
| 202,746 |
|
IDR | 1,528,000,000 |
| 11.00%, 11/15/20 |
|
| 212,206 |
|
IDR | 7,509,000,000 |
| 11.00%, 09/15/25 |
|
| 1,057,547 |
|
IDR | 2,125,000,000 |
| 11.25%, 05/15/14 |
|
| 274,579 |
|
IDR | 1,686,000,000 |
| 11.50%, 09/15/19 |
|
| 239,113 |
|
IDR | 1,586,000,000 |
| 12.00%, 09/15/26 |
|
| 238,390 |
|
IDR | 2,511,000,000 |
| 12.50%, 03/15/13 |
|
| 320,718 |
|
IDR | 1,737,000,000 |
| 12.80%, 06/15/21 |
|
| 267,356 |
|
IDR | 1,810,000,000 |
| 12.90%, 06/15/22 |
|
| 282,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 8,174,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Malaysia: 9.4% |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| Malaysia Government Bonds |
|
|
|
|
MYR | 1,100,000 |
| 2.51%, 08/27/12 |
|
| 349,896 |
|
MYR | 1,985,000 |
| 3.21%, 05/31/13 |
|
| 637,420 |
|
MYR | 1,515,000 |
| 3.50%, 05/31/27 |
|
| 454,052 |
|
MYR | 4,291,000 |
| 3.70%, 05/15/13 |
|
| 1,394,570 |
|
MYR | 3,673,000 |
| 3.70%, 02/25/13 |
|
| 1,193,731 |
|
MYR | 2,360,000 |
| 3.72%, 06/15/12 |
|
| 766,417 |
|
MYR | 3,979,000 |
| 3.74%, 02/27/15 |
|
| 1,295,002 |
|
MYR | 6,301,000 |
| 4.24%, 02/07/18 |
|
| 2,090,492 |
|
MYR | 616,000 |
| 4.26%, 09/15/16 |
|
| 205,391 |
|
MYR | 1,071,000 |
| 4.38%, 11/29/19 |
|
| 358,673 |
|
MYR | 1,614,000 |
| 4.71%, 09/15/26 |
|
| 559,018 |
|
MYR | 4,198,000 |
| 5.09%, 04/30/14 |
|
| 1,425,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 10,730,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Mexico: 8.9% |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| Mexican Bonds |
|
|
|
|
MXN | 3,500,000 |
| 7.50%, 06/21/12 |
|
| 297,549 |
|
MXN | 2,178,300 |
| 7.50%, 06/03/27 |
|
| 192,690 |
|
MXN | 21,191,200 |
| 7.75%, 12/14/17 |
|
| 1,921,094 |
|
MXN | 2,300,000 |
| 8.00%, 12/19/13 |
|
| 202,374 |
|
MXN | 21,447,900 |
| 8.00%, 06/11/20 |
|
| 1,996,342 |
|
MXN | 10,744,000 |
| 8.50%, 12/13/18 |
|
| 1,018,726 |
|
MXN | 2,000,000 |
| 8.50%, 05/31/29 |
|
| 191,329 |
|
MXN | 14,344,500 |
| 9.00%, 12/20/12 |
|
| 1,264,246 |
|
MXN | 1,885,100 |
| 9.00%, 06/20/13 |
|
| 168,167 |
|
MXN | 17,416,300 |
| 9.50%, 12/18/14 |
|
| 1,633,624 |
|
MXN | 7,233,100 |
| 10.00%, 12/05/24 |
|
| 789,383 |
|
MXN | 3,843,000 |
| 10.00%, 11/20/36 |
|
| 424,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 10,099,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Netherlands: 1.2% |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| Rabobank Nederland NV |
|
|
|
|
EUR | 8,730,000 |
| 9.20%, 09/28/15 |
|
| 777,672 |
|
EUR | 3,800,000 |
| 11.00%, 07/23/12 |
|
| 579,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,357,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Peru: 3.0% |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| Peru Government Bonds |
|
|
|
|
PEN | 1,725,000 |
| 6.90%, 08/12/37 |
|
| 671,527 |
|
PEN | 1,398,000 |
| 6.95%, 08/12/31 |
|
| 537,402 |
|
PEN | 1,768,000 |
| 7.84%, 08/12/20 |
|
| 743,138 |
|
PEN | 2,002,000 |
| 8.20%, 08/12/26 |
|
| 862,770 |
|
PEN | 823,000 |
| 8.60%, 08/12/17 |
|
| 358,760 |
|
PEN | 453,000 |
| 9.91%, 05/05/15 |
|
| 198,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 3,371,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
49
|
EMERGING MARKETS LOCAL CURRENCY BOND ETF |
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| ||
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Philippines: 3.1% |
|
|
|
| |||
PHP | 144,000,000 |
| Philippine Government International Bond |
| $ | 3,565,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Poland: 9.5% |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| Poland Government Bonds |
|
|
|
|
PLN | 1,454,000 |
| 4.41%, 01/25/12 |
|
| 483,460 |
|
PLN | 1,656,000 |
| 4.63%, 07/25/12 |
|
| 536,488 |
|
PLN | 4,052,000 |
| 4.75%, 04/25/12 |
|
| 1,422,624 |
|
PLN | 895,000 |
| 4.78%, 10/25/12 |
|
| 286,040 |
|
PLN | 4,741,000 |
| 5.00%, 10/24/13 |
|
| 1,665,239 |
|
PLN | 1,682,000 |
| 5.25%, 04/25/13 |
|
| 595,911 |
|
PLN | 334,000 |
| 5.25%, 10/25/17 |
|
| 115,786 |
|
PLN | 4,233,000 |
| 5.25%, 10/25/20 |
|
| 1,441,962 |
|
PLN | 802,000 |
| 5.50%, 04/25/15 |
|
| 284,528 |
|
PLN | 1,499,000 |
| 5.50%, 10/25/19 |
|
| 521,918 |
|
PLN | 2,152,000 |
| 5.75%, 04/25/14 |
|
| 771,597 |
|
PLN | 2,078,000 |
| 5.75%, 09/23/22 |
|
| 731,627 |
|
PLN | 5,542,000 |
| 6.25%, 10/24/15 |
|
| 2,024,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 10,882,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Russia: 4.3% |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| Russian Federal Bonds |
|
|
|
|
RUB | 7,522,000 |
| 6.20%, 11/09/11 |
|
| 248,095 |
|
RUB | 14,887,000 |
| 6.85%, 08/01/12 |
|
| 492,821 |
|
RUB | 11,990,000 |
| 6.88%, 07/15/15 |
|
| 388,370 |
|
RUB | 14,766,000 |
| 6.90%, 08/03/16 |
|
| 475,961 |
|
RUB | 21,677,000 |
| 7.15%, 01/23/13 |
|
| 723,206 |
|
RUB | 13,995,000 |
| 8.10%, 11/26/14 |
|
| 480,797 |
|
RUB | 15,375,000 |
| 11.20%, 12/17/14 |
|
| 582,469 |
|
RUB | 2,800,000 |
| 11.30%, 10/17/12 |
|
| 100,541 |
|
RUB | 3,899,000 |
| 11.90%, 01/18/12 |
|
| 137,033 |
|
RUB | 21,344,000 |
| 12.00%, 03/27/13 |
|
| 789,509 |
|
RUB | 12,260,000 |
| 12.00%, 08/20/14 |
|
| 470,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 4,889,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
South Africa: 8.2% |
|
|
|
| |||
ZAR | 2,350,000 |
| Eskom Holdings Ltd. |
|
| 311,571 |
|
|
|
| South Africa Government Bonds |
|
|
|
|
ZAR | 9,150,000 |
| 6.25%, 03/31/36 |
|
| 1,059,149 |
|
ZAR | 1,438,804 |
| 6.75%, 03/31/21 |
|
| 190,201 |
|
ZAR | 4,956,000 |
| 7.00%, 02/28/31 |
|
| 637,606 |
|
ZAR | 1,000,000 |
| 7.25%, 01/15/20 |
|
| 138,381 |
|
ZAR | 1,384,000 |
| 7.50%, 01/15/14 |
|
| 203,871 |
|
ZAR | 4,487,000 |
| 8.00%, 12/21/18 |
|
| 657,123 |
|
ZAR | 1,923,752 |
| 8.25%, 09/15/17 |
|
| 286,427 |
|
ZAR | 2,210,000 |
| 8.75%, 12/21/14 |
|
| 339,191 |
|
ZAR | 4,475,000 |
| 10.50%, 12/21/26 |
|
| 784,626 |
|
ZAR | 5,355,000 |
| 13.50%, 09/15/15 |
|
| 971,760 |
|
|
|
| Transnet Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
ZAR | 3,500,000 |
| 10.50%, 09/17/20 |
|
| 552,047 |
|
ZAR | 19,900,000 |
| 10.80%, 11/06/23 |
|
| 3,196,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 9,328,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Supranational: 3.5% |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| European Bank for Reconstruction & Development |
|
|
|
|
MXN | 6,000,000 |
| 7.30%, 08/20/13 |
|
| 507,094 |
|
BRL | 1,130,000 |
| 9.25%, 09/10/12 |
|
| 680,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
| Value |
| ||
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||
Supranational: (continued) |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| European Investment Bank |
|
|
|
|
HUF | 108,000,000 |
| 6.50%, 01/05/15 |
| $ | 583,019 |
|
ZAR | 8,760,000 |
| 8.00%, 10/21/13 |
|
| 1,308,586 |
|
BRL | 2,300,000 |
| 9.06%, 10/22/19 |
|
| 639,761 |
|
|
|
| International Bank for Reconstruction & Development |
|
|
|
|
MXN | 777,000 |
| 8.25%, 06/24/11 |
|
| 64,522 |
|
BRL | 300,000 |
| 9.50%, 03/02/17 |
|
| 183,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 3,966,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Thailand: 8.4% |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| Thailand Government Bonds |
|
|
|
|
THB | 5,120,000 |
| 3.63%, 05/22/15 |
|
| 176,670 |
|
THB | 11,215,000 |
| 3.63%, 06/16/23 |
|
| 383,425 |
|
THB | 8,160,000 |
| 4.13%, 11/18/16 |
|
| 289,281 |
|
THB | 9,092,000 |
| 4.25%, 03/13/13 |
|
| 316,406 |
|
THB | 20,560,000 |
| 4.75%, 12/20/24 |
|
| 784,611 |
|
THB | 8,395,000 |
| 4.88%, 06/22/29 |
|
| 336,608 |
|
THB | 32,004,000 |
| 5.13%, 03/13/18 |
|
| 1,209,718 |
|
THB | 24,271,000 |
| 5.25%, 07/13/13 |
|
| 868,472 |
|
THB | 66,328,000 |
| 5.25%, 05/12/14 |
|
| 2,406,919 |
|
THB | 11,244,000 |
| 5.40%, 07/27/16 |
|
| 423,044 |
|
THB | 32,705,000 |
| 5.63%, 01/12/19 |
|
| 1,285,278 |
|
THB | 26,678,000 |
| 5.85%, 03/31/21 |
|
| 1,090,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 9,570,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Turkey: 8.3% |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| Turkey Government Bonds |
|
|
|
|
TRY | 176,000 |
| 7.40%, 11/16/11 |
|
| 113,897 |
|
TRY | 2,790,000 |
| 8.28%, 01/25/12 |
|
| 1,777,507 |
|
TRY | 1,475,000 |
| 8.64%, 04/25/12 |
|
| 923,222 |
|
TRY | 1,895,600 |
| 10.00%, 01/09/13 |
|
| 1,390,164 |
|
TRY | 1,698,000 |
| 10.00%, 04/10/13 |
|
| 1,250,290 |
|
TRY | 900,000 |
| 10.00%, 06/17/15 |
|
| 675,243 |
|
TRY | 730,000 |
| 10.50%, 01/15/20 |
|
| 580,121 |
|
TRY | 210,000 |
| 11.00%, 08/06/14 |
|
| 162,768 |
|
TRY | 1,706,400 |
| 14.00%, 09/26/12 |
|
| 1,323,797 |
|
TRY | 1,695,000 |
| 16.00%, 03/07/12 |
|
| 1,311,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 9,508,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Foreign Debt Obligations |
|
| 111,125,487 |
| |||
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| |||
MONEY MARKET FUND: 0.0% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 32,335 |
| Dreyfus Government Cash Management Fund |
|
| 32,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Investments: 97.6% |
|
| 111,157,822 |
| |||
Other assets less liabilities: 2.4% |
|
| 2,724,246 |
| |||
|
|
| |||||
NET ASSETS: 100.0% |
| $ | 113,882,068 |
| |||
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
50
|
|
|
|
Currency Type |
| |
| ||
BRL | Brazilian Real | |
CLP | Chilean Peso | |
COP | Colombian Peso | |
EGP | Egyptian Pound | |
EUR | Euro | |
HUF | Hungarian Forint | |
IDR | Indonesian Rupiah | |
MXN | Mexican Peso | |
MYR | Malaysian Ringgit | |
PEN | Peruvian Nuevo Sol | |
PHP | Philippine Peso | |
PLN | Polish Zloty | |
RUB | Russian Rouble | |
THB | Thai Baht | |
TRY | Turkish Lira | |
ZAR | South African Rand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of Investments By Sector (unaudited) |
|
| % of |
| Value |
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||||
Financial |
|
| 3.1 | % |
| $ | 3,405,376 |
| |
Government |
|
| 91.5 |
|
|
| 101,758,145 |
| |
Industrial |
|
| 3.4 |
|
|
| 3,748,641 |
| |
Utilities |
|
| 2.0 |
|
|
| 2,213,325 |
| |
Money Market Fund |
|
| 0.0 |
|
|
| 32,335 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| 100.0 | % |
| $ | 111,157,822 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The summary of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of October 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Value |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Foreign Debt Obligations* |
| $ | — |
| $ | 111,125,487 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 111,125,487 |
|
Money Market Fund |
|
| 32,335 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 32,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total |
| $ | 32,335 |
| $ | 111,125,487 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 111,157,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*See Schedule of Investments for security type and geographic sector breakouts
See Notes to Financial Statements
51
|
October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| High-Yield |
| Intermediate |
| Long Municipal |
| Pre-Refunded |
| Short |
| Emerging |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Investments, at value (1) |
| $ | 213,311,273 |
| $ | 224,977,201 |
| $ | 71,757,267 |
| $ | 37,390,653 |
| $ | 103,377,064 |
| $ | 111,157,822 |
| |
Cash |
|
| 714,556 |
|
| — |
|
| 512,761 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |
Cash denominated in foreign currency (2) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 813,871 |
| |
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Investment securities sold |
|
| — |
|
| 2,245,952 |
|
| — |
|
| 483,722 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |
Shares sold |
|
| — |
|
| 4,420,008 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |
Dividends and interest |
|
| 4,390,080 |
|
| 3,068,587 |
|
| 1,011,235 |
|
| 578,006 |
|
| 1,360,129 |
|
| 1,962,053 |
| |
Prepaid expenses |
|
| 24,568 |
|
| 17,595 |
|
| 8,233 |
|
| 819 |
|
| 11,099 |
|
| 14,608 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total assets |
|
| 218,440,477 |
|
| 234,729,343 |
|
| 73,289,496 |
|
| 38,453,200 |
|
| 104,748,292 |
|
| 113,948,354 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Payables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Investment securities purchased |
|
| 489,205 |
|
| 6,806,260 |
|
| 489,205 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |
Due to Adviser |
|
| 63,260 |
|
| 45,063 |
|
| 14,328 |
|
| 7,550 |
|
| 17,403 |
|
| 28,168 |
| |
Due to custodian |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 487,057 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |
Deferred trustee fees |
|
| 4,036 |
|
| 3,847 |
|
| 1,859 |
|
| 1,065 |
|
| 2,038 |
|
| 78 |
| |
Accrued expenses |
|
| 44,153 |
|
| 41,437 |
|
| 56,755 |
|
| 43,914 |
|
| 41,839 |
|
| 38,040 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
|
| 600,654 |
|
| 6,896,607 |
|
| 562,147 |
|
| 539,586 |
|
| 61,280 |
|
| 66,286 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
NET ASSETS |
| $ | 217,839,823 |
| $ | 227,832,736 |
| $ | 72,727,349 |
| $ | 37,913,614 |
| $ | 104,687,012 |
| $ | 113,882,068 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Shares outstanding |
|
| 7,000,000 |
|
| 10,300,000 |
|
| 3,850,000 |
|
| 1,500,000 |
|
| 5,950,000 |
|
| 4,200,000 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net asset value, redemption and offering price per share |
| $ | 31.12 |
| $ | 22.12 |
| $ | 18.89 |
| $ | 25.28 |
| $ | 17.59 |
| $ | 27.11 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net assets consist of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Aggregate paid in capital |
| $ | 198,292,150 |
| $ | 219,401,613 |
| $ | 71,116,190 |
| $ | 37,044,529 |
| $ | 101,820,916 |
| $ | 110,025,666 |
| |
Net unrealized appreciation |
|
| 15,464,243 |
|
| 7,445,260 |
|
| 3,510,714 |
|
| 742,722 |
|
| 2,306,678 |
|
| 3,365,361 |
| |
Undistributed net investment income |
|
| 2,752,225 |
|
| 697,362 |
|
| 338,821 |
|
| 45,395 |
|
| 213,408 |
|
| 407,989 |
| |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) |
|
| 1,331,205 |
|
| 288,501 |
|
| (2,238,376 | ) |
| 80,968 |
|
| 346,010 |
|
| 83,052 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| $ | 217,839,823 |
| $ | 227,832,736 |
| $ | 72,727,349 |
| $ | 37,913,614 |
| $ | 104,687,012 |
| $ | 113,882,068 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
(1) | Cost of Investments |
| $ | 197,847,030 |
| $ | 217,531,941 |
| $ | 68,246,553 |
| $ | 36,647,931 |
| $ | 101,070,386 |
| $ | 107,815,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
(2) | Cost of cash denominated in foreign currency |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 819,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
52
|
For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| High-Yield |
| Intermediate |
| Long Municipal |
| Pre-Refunded |
| Short |
| Emerging |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
| $ | 6,090,605 |
| $ | 3,522,508 |
| $ | 1,441,261 |
| $ | 297,392 |
| $ | 1,097,578 |
| $ | 1,020,123 |
|
Foreign taxes withheld |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (50,762 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total income |
|
| 6,090,605 |
|
| 3,522,508 |
|
| 1,441,261 |
|
| 297,392 |
|
| 1,097,578 |
|
| 969,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees |
|
| 408,501 |
|
| 232,893 |
|
| 74,307 |
|
| 46,579 |
|
| 111,612 |
|
| 60,449 |
|
Professional fees |
|
| 42,056 |
|
| 34,703 |
|
| 25,072 |
|
| 22,180 |
|
| 24,742 |
|
| 13,209 |
|
Insurance |
|
| 1,612 |
|
| 1,130 |
|
| 716 |
|
| 656 |
|
| 851 |
|
| — |
|
Trustees’ fees and expenses |
|
| 448 |
|
| 315 |
|
| 143 |
|
| 128 |
|
| 310 |
|
| 405 |
|
Reports to shareholders |
|
| 8,484 |
|
| 13,305 |
|
| 1,726 |
|
| 11,551 |
|
| 4,366 |
|
| 3,493 |
|
Indicative optimized portfolio value fee |
|
| 5,450 |
|
| 14,250 |
|
| 16,618 |
|
| 6,375 |
|
| 13,046 |
|
| 7,736 |
|
Custodian fees |
|
| 2,524 |
|
| 2,569 |
|
| 4,050 |
|
| 1,196 |
|
| 2,821 |
|
| 4,627 |
|
Registration fees |
|
| 5,441 |
|
| 1,582 |
|
| 3,714 |
|
| 3,272 |
|
| 4,037 |
|
| 1,718 |
|
Transfer agent fees |
|
| 331 |
|
| 2,202 |
|
| 2,713 |
|
| 297 |
|
| 1,971 |
|
| 734 |
|
Fund accounting fees |
|
| 3,987 |
|
| 7,584 |
|
| 14,557 |
|
| 3,649 |
|
| 16,491 |
|
| 9,200 |
|
Interest |
|
| 552 |
|
| 782 |
|
| 183 |
|
| 116 |
|
| 377 |
|
| 4,744 |
|
Other |
|
| 3,529 |
|
| 15,043 |
|
| 13,525 |
|
| 3,419 |
|
| 7,222 |
|
| 2,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total expenses |
|
| 482,915 |
|
| 326,358 |
|
| 157,324 |
|
| 99,418 |
|
| 187,846 |
|
| 109,250 |
|
Waiver of management fees |
|
| (160,203 | ) |
| (98,543 | ) |
| (46,925 | ) |
| (32,029 | ) |
| (78,047 | ) |
| (19,878 | ) |
Expenses assumed by the Adviser |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (37,786 | ) |
| (21,976 | ) |
| (13,419 | ) |
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Net expenses |
|
| 322,712 |
|
| 227,815 |
|
| 72,613 |
|
| 45,413 |
|
| 96,380 |
|
| 89,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Net investment income |
|
| 5,767,893 |
|
| 3,294,693 |
|
| 1,368,648 |
|
| 251,979 |
|
| 1,001,198 |
|
| 879,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain (loss) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| 324,027 |
|
| 252,566 |
|
| (80,196 | ) |
| 77,915 |
|
| 254,821 |
|
| 29,139 |
|
Forward foreign currency contracts and foreign currency transactions |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 53,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) |
|
| 324,027 |
|
| 252,566 |
|
| (80,196 | ) |
| 77,915 |
|
| 254,821 |
|
| 83,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| 2,246,119 |
|
| 4,168,472 |
|
| 1,221,225 |
|
| 367,086 |
|
| 1,132,780 |
|
| 3,342,707 |
|
Forward foreign currency contracts and foreign denominated assets and liabilities |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 22,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Change in net unrealized appreciation |
|
| 2,246,119 |
|
| 4,168,472 |
|
| 1,221,225 |
|
| 367,086 |
|
| 1,132,780 |
|
| 3,365,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
| $ | 8,338,039 |
| $ | 7,715,731 |
| $ | 2,509,677 |
| $ | 696,980 |
| $ | 2,388,799 |
| $ | 4,328,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* For the period July 22, 2010 (commencement of operations) through October 31, 2010.
See Notes to Financial Statements
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| High-Yield Municipal Index ETF |
| Intermediate Municipal Index ETF |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| For the Six Months |
| For the Year |
| For the Six Months |
| For the Year |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
| (unaudited) |
|
|
|
| |||||
Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net investment income |
|
| $ | 5,767,893 |
|
| $ | 7,969,707 |
|
| $ | 3,294,693 |
|
| $ | 3,469,479 |
|
Net realized gain (loss) |
|
|
| 324,027 |
|
|
| 973,497 |
|
|
| 252,566 |
|
|
| 38,649 |
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation |
|
|
| 2,246,119 |
|
|
| 11,517,677 |
|
|
| 4,168,472 |
|
|
| 2,753,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
|
|
| 8,338,039 |
|
|
| 20,460,881 |
|
|
| 7,715,731 |
|
|
| 6,261,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and Distributions to shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from net investment income |
|
|
| (5,082,600 | ) |
|
| (6,451,700 | ) |
|
| (3,075,400 | ) |
|
| (3,174,300 | ) |
Distributions from net realized capital gains |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| (19,600 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total dividends and distributions |
|
|
| (5,082,600 | ) |
|
| (6,451,700 | ) |
|
| (3,075,400 | ) |
|
| (3,193,900 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share transactions:** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of shares |
|
|
| 55,374,038 |
|
|
| 66,550,431 |
|
|
| 64,013,760 |
|
|
| 106,265,147 |
|
Cost of shares redeemed |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| (2,070,263 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from share transactions |
|
|
| 55,374,038 |
|
|
| 66,550,431 |
|
|
| 64,013,760 |
|
|
| 104,194,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total increase (decrease) in net assets |
|
|
| 58,629,477 |
|
|
| 80,559,612 |
|
|
| 68,654,091 |
|
|
| 107,262,937 |
|
Net Assets, beginning of period |
|
|
| 159,210,346 |
|
|
| 78,650,734 |
|
|
| 159,178,645 |
|
|
| 51,915,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Net Assets, end of period† |
|
| $ | 217,839,823 |
|
| $ | 159,210,346 |
|
| $ | 227,832,736 |
|
| $ | 159,178,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
† Including undistributed net investment income |
|
| $ | 2,752,225 |
|
| $ | 2,066,932 |
|
| $ | 697,362 |
|
| $ | 478,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
** Shares of Common Stock Issued (no par value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares sold |
|
|
| 1,800,000 |
|
|
| 2,200,000 |
|
|
| 2,900,000 |
|
|
| 5,000,000 |
|
Shares redeemed |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| (100,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) |
|
|
| 1,800,000 |
|
|
| 2,200,000 |
|
|
| 2,900,000 |
|
|
| 4,900,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Commencement of operations |
See Notes to Financial Statements
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Long Municipal Index ETF |
| Pre-Refunded Municipal Index ETF |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| For the Six Months |
| For the Year |
| For the Six Months |
| For the Year |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| (unaudited) |
|
|
|
| (unaudited) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net investment income |
|
| $ | 1,368,648 |
|
| $ | 1,866,542 |
|
| $ | 251,979 |
|
| $ | 452,433 |
|
Net realized gain (loss) |
|
|
| (80,196 | ) |
|
| (301,116 | ) |
|
| 77,915 |
|
|
| 3,053 |
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation |
|
|
| 1,221,225 |
|
|
| 2,779,809 |
|
|
| 367,086 |
|
|
| 306,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
|
|
| 2,509,677 |
|
|
| 4,345,235 |
|
|
| 696,980 |
|
|
| 761,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and Distributions to shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from net investment income |
|
|
| (1,272,150 | ) |
|
| (1,800,225 | ) |
|
| (255,400 | ) |
|
| (419,300 | ) |
Distributions from net realized capital gains |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total dividends and distributions |
|
|
| (1,272,150 | ) |
|
| (1,800,225 | ) |
|
| (255,400 | ) |
|
| (419,300 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share transactions:** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of shares |
|
|
| 18,779,158 |
|
|
| 23,544,272 |
|
|
| 2,529,844 |
|
|
| 19,837,071 |
|
Cost of shares redeemed |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| (3,626,037 | ) |
|
| (5,022,388 | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from share transactions |
|
|
| 18,779,158 |
|
|
| 19,918,235 |
|
|
| (2,492,544 | ) |
|
| 19,837,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total increase (decrease) in net assets |
|
|
| 20,016,685 |
|
|
| 22,463,245 |
|
|
| (2,050,964 | ) |
|
| 20,179,430 |
|
Net Assets, beginning of period |
|
|
| 52,710,664 |
|
|
| 30,247,419 |
|
|
| 39,964,578 |
|
|
| 19,785,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Net Assets, end of period† |
|
| $ | 72,727,349 |
|
| $ | 52,710,664 |
|
| $ | 37,913,614 |
|
| $ | 39,964,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
† Including undistributed net investment income |
|
| $ | 338,821 |
|
| $ | 242,323 |
|
| $ | 45,395 |
|
| $ | 48,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** Shares of Common Stock Issued (no par value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares sold |
|
|
| 1,000,000 |
|
|
| 1,300,000 |
|
|
| 100,000 |
|
|
| 800,000 |
|
Shares redeemed |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| (200,000 | ) |
|
| (200,000 | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) |
|
|
| 1,000,000 |
|
|
| 1,100,000 |
|
|
| (100,000 | ) |
|
| 800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Short Municipal Index ETF |
| Emerging Markets Local |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| For the Six Months |
| For the Year |
| For the Period |
| ||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| (unaudited) |
|
|
| (unaudited) |
| ||||||
Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net investment income |
|
| $ | 1,001,198 |
|
| $ | 1,244,427 |
|
| $ | 879,989 |
|
Net realized gain (loss) |
|
|
| 254,821 |
|
|
| 96,585 |
|
|
| 83,052 |
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation |
|
|
| 1,132,780 |
|
|
| 837,301 |
|
|
| 3,365,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
|
|
| 2,388,799 |
|
|
| 2,178,313 |
|
|
| 4,328,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and Distributions to shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from net investment income |
|
|
| (958,000 | ) |
|
| (1,124,900 | ) |
|
| (472,000 | ) |
Distributions from net realized capital gains |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total dividends and distributions |
|
|
| (958,000 | ) |
|
| (1,124,900 | ) |
|
| (472,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share transactions:** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of shares |
|
|
| 14,034,691 |
|
|
| 63,625,564 |
|
|
| 115,171,814 |
|
Cost of shares redeemed |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| (5,146,148 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from share transactions |
|
|
| 14,034,691 |
|
|
| 63,625,564 |
|
|
| 110,025,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total increase (decrease) in net assets |
|
|
| 15,465,490 |
|
|
| 64,678,977 |
|
|
| 113,882,068 |
|
Net Assets, beginning of period |
|
|
| 89,221,522 |
|
|
| 24,542,545 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net Assets, end of period† |
|
| $ | 104,687,012 |
|
| $ | 89,221,522 |
|
| $ | 113,882,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| $ | 213,408 |
|
| $ | 170,210 |
|
| $ | 407,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
† Including undistributed net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** Shares of Common Stock Issued (no par value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares sold |
|
|
| 800,000 |
|
|
| 3,700,000 |
|
|
| 4,400,000 |
|
Shares redeemed |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| (200,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net increase (decrease) |
|
|
| 800,000 |
|
|
| 3,700,000 |
|
|
| 4,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
55
|
For a share outstanding throughout the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
| For the |
| For the Year |
| For the Period |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
|
| $ | 30.62 |
|
|
| $ | 26.22 |
|
|
| $ | 25.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Income from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
|
| 0.87 |
|
|
|
| 2.08 |
|
|
|
| 0.54 |
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain on investments |
|
|
| 0.51 |
|
|
|
| 4.17 |
|
|
|
| 0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total from Investment Operations |
|
|
| 1.38 |
|
|
|
| 6.25 |
|
|
|
| 1.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from Net Investment Income |
|
|
| (0.88 | ) |
|
|
| (1.85 | ) |
|
|
| (0.33 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total Dividends |
|
|
| (0.88 | ) |
|
|
| (1.85 | ) |
|
|
| (0.33 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
|
| $ | 31.12 |
|
|
| $ | 30.62 |
|
|
| $ | 26.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total Return (d) |
|
|
| 4.53 | %(e) |
|
|
| 24.47 | % |
|
|
| 4.32 | %(e) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
|
| $ | 217,840 |
|
|
| $ | 159,210 |
|
|
| $ | 78,651 |
|
|
Ratio of Gross Expenses to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.52 | %(f) |
|
|
| 0.65 | % |
|
|
| 0.71 | %(f) |
|
Ratio of Net Expenses to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.35 | %(f) |
|
|
| 0.35 | % |
|
|
| 0.35 | %(f) |
|
Ratio of Net Expenses, Excluding Interest Expense, to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.35 | %(f) |
|
|
| 0.35 | % |
|
|
| 0.35 | %(f) |
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 6.25 | %(f) |
|
|
| 7.45 | % |
|
|
| 9.11 | %(f) |
|
Portfolio turnover rate |
|
|
| 19 | %(e) |
|
|
| 19 | % |
|
|
| 0 | %(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
| For the |
| For the Year |
| For the Year |
| For the Period |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
|
| $ | 21.51 |
|
|
| $ | 20.77 |
|
|
| $ | 20.63 |
|
|
| $ | 20.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
|
| 0.37 |
|
|
|
| 0.75 |
|
|
|
| 0.76 |
|
|
|
| 0.29 |
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on investments |
|
|
| 0.61 |
|
|
|
| 0.75 |
|
|
|
| 0.10 |
|
|
|
| (0.20 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total from Investment Operations |
|
|
| 0.98 |
|
|
|
| 1.50 |
|
|
|
| 0.86 |
|
|
|
| 0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from Net Investment Income |
|
|
| (0.37 | ) |
|
|
| (0.76 | ) |
|
|
| (0.72 | ) |
|
|
| (0.26 | ) |
|
Distributions from Net Realized Capital Gains |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| — | (c) |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total Dividends and Distributions |
|
|
| (0.37 | ) |
|
|
| (0.76 | ) |
|
|
| (0.72 | ) |
|
|
| (0.26 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
|
| $ | 22.12 |
|
|
| $ | 21.51 |
|
|
| $ | 20.77 |
|
|
| $ | 20.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total Return (d) |
|
|
| 4.53 | %(e) |
|
|
| 7.35 | % |
|
|
| 4.32 | % |
|
|
| 0.43 | %(e) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
|
| $ | 227,833 |
|
|
| $ | 159,179 |
|
|
| $ | 51,916 |
|
|
| $ | 15,473 |
|
|
Ratio of Gross Expenses to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.34 | %(f) |
|
|
| 0.45 | % |
|
|
| 0.70 | % |
|
|
| 1.60 | %(f) |
|
Ratio of Net Expenses to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.24 | %(f) |
|
|
| 0.23 | % |
|
|
| 0.20 | % |
|
|
| 0.20 | %(f) |
|
Ratio of Net Expenses, Excluding Interest Expense, to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.24 | %(f) |
|
|
| 0.23 | % |
|
|
| 0.20 | % |
|
|
| 0.20 | %(f) |
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 3.48 | %(f) |
|
|
| 3.73 | % |
|
|
| 3.97 | % |
|
|
| 3.53 | %(f) |
|
Portfolio turnover rate |
|
|
| 6 | %(e) |
|
|
| 22 | % |
|
|
| 11 | % |
|
|
| 0 | %(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Commencement of operations | |
(b) | On October 24, 2008, each Fund effected a stock split as described in the Notes to Financial Statements. Per share data prior to this date has been adjusted to give effect to the stock split. | |
(c) | Amount represents less than $0.005 per share | |
(d) | Total return is calculated assuming an initial investment of $10,000 made at the net asset value at the beginning of period, reinvestment of any dividends and distributions at net asset value on the dividend/distributions payment date and a redemption on the last day of the period. The return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund dividends/distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. | |
(e) | Not Annualized | |
(f) | Annualized |
See Notes to Financial Statements
56
|
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS |
For a share outstanding throughout the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
| For the Six |
| For the Year |
| For the Year |
| For the Period |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
|
| $ | 18.49 |
|
|
| $ | 17.28 |
|
|
| $ | 19.31 |
|
|
| $ | 20.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
|
| 0.41 |
|
|
|
| 0.83 |
|
|
|
| 0.86 |
|
|
|
| 0.24 |
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on investments |
|
|
| 0.40 |
|
|
|
| 1.23 |
|
|
|
| (2.07 | ) |
|
|
| (0.72 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total from Investment Operations |
|
|
| 0.81 |
|
|
|
| 2.06 |
|
|
|
| (1.21 | ) |
|
|
| (0.48 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from Net Investment Income |
|
|
| (0.41 | ) |
|
|
| (0.85 | ) |
|
|
| (0.82 | ) |
|
|
| (0.21 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total Dividends |
|
|
| (0.41 | ) |
|
|
| (0.85 | ) |
|
|
| (0.82 | ) |
|
|
| (0.21 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
|
| $ | 18.89 |
|
|
| $ | 18.49 |
|
|
| $ | 17.28 |
|
|
| $ | 19.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total Return (c) |
|
|
| 4.41 | %(d) |
|
|
| 12.20 | % |
|
|
| (6.24 | )% |
|
|
| (2.42 | )%(d) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
|
| $ | 72,727 |
|
|
| $ | 52,711 |
|
|
| $ | 30,247 |
|
|
| $ | 24,142 |
|
|
Ratio of Gross Expenses to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.52 | %(e) |
|
|
| 0.64 | % |
|
|
| 0.78 | % |
|
|
| 1.47 | %(e) |
|
Ratio of Net Expenses to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.24 | %(e) |
|
|
| 0.25 | % |
|
|
| 0.24 | % |
|
|
| 0.24 | %(e) |
|
Ratio of Net Expenses, Excluding Interest Expense, to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.24 | %(e) |
|
|
| 0.24 | % |
|
|
| 0.24 | % |
|
|
| 0.24 | %(e) |
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 4.53 | %(e) |
|
|
| 4.78 | % |
|
|
| 5.15 | % |
|
|
| 4.48 | %(e) |
|
Portfolio turnover rate |
|
|
| 3 | %(d) |
|
|
| 20 | % |
|
|
| 44 | % |
|
|
| 0 | %(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
| For the Six |
| For the Year |
| For the Period |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
|
| $ | 24.98 |
|
|
| $ | 24.73 |
|
|
| $ | 24.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Income from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
|
| 0.17 |
|
|
|
| 0.35 |
|
|
|
| 0.06 |
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on investments |
|
|
| 0.30 |
|
|
|
| 0.24 |
|
|
|
| (0.05 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total from Investment Operations |
|
|
| 0.47 |
|
|
|
| 0.59 |
|
|
|
| 0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from Net Investment Income |
|
|
| (0.17 | ) |
|
|
| (0.34 | ) |
|
|
| (0.04 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total Dividends |
|
|
| (0.17 | ) |
|
|
| (0.34 | ) |
|
|
| (0.04 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
|
| $ | 25.28 |
|
|
| $ | 24.98 |
|
|
| $ | 24.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total Return (c) |
|
|
| 1.85 | %(d) |
|
|
| 2.38 | % |
|
|
| 0.06 | %(d) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
|
| $ | 37,914 |
|
|
| $ | 39,965 |
|
|
| $ | 19,785 |
|
|
Ratio of Gross Expenses to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.53 | %(e) |
|
|
| 0.67 | % |
|
|
| 1.26 | %(e) |
|
Ratio of Net Expenses to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.24 | %(e) |
|
|
| 0.24 | % |
|
|
| 0.24 | %(e) |
|
Ratio of Net Expenses, Excluding Interest Expense, to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.24 | %(e) |
|
|
| 0.24 | % |
|
|
| 0.24 | %(e) |
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 1.34 | %(e) |
|
|
| 1.44 | % |
|
|
| 1.29 | %(e) |
|
Portfolio turnover rate |
|
|
| 19 | %(d) |
|
|
| 8 | % |
|
|
| 0 | %(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Commencement of operations | |
(b) | On October 24, 2008, each Fund effected a stock split as described in the Notes to Financial Statements. Per share data prior to this date has been adjusted to give effect to the stock split. | |
(c) | Total return is calculated assuming an initial investment of $10,000 made at the net asset value at the beginning of period, reinvestment of any dividends and distributions at net asset value on the dividend/distributions payment date and a redemption on the last day of the period. The return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund dividends/distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. | |
(d) | Not Annualized | |
(e) | Annualized |
See Notes to Financial Statements
57
|
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS |
For a share outstanding throughout the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
| For the Six |
| For the Year |
| For the Year |
| For the Period |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
|
| $ | 17.32 |
|
|
| $ | 16.93 |
|
|
| $ | 16.47 |
|
|
| $ | 16.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
|
| 0.18 |
|
|
|
| 0.39 |
|
|
|
| 0.43 |
|
|
|
| 0.08 |
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on investments |
|
|
| 0.27 |
|
|
|
| 0.39 |
|
|
|
| 0.46 |
|
|
|
| (0.07 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total from Investment Operations |
|
|
| 0.45 |
|
|
|
| 0.78 |
|
|
|
| 0.89 |
|
|
|
| 0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from Net Investment Income |
|
|
| (0.18 | ) |
|
|
| (0.39 | ) |
|
|
| (0.43 | ) |
|
|
| (0.07 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total Dividends |
|
|
| (0.18 | ) |
|
|
| (0.39 | ) |
|
|
| (0.43 | ) |
|
|
| (0.07 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
|
| $ | 17.59 |
|
|
| $ | 17.32 |
|
|
| $ | 16.93 |
|
|
| $ | 16.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total Return (c) |
|
|
| 2.60 | %(d) |
|
|
| 4.64 | % |
|
|
| 5.50 | % |
|
|
| 0.07 | %(d) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
|
| $ | 104,687 |
|
|
| $ | 89,222 |
|
|
| $ | 24,543 |
|
|
| $ | 4,942 |
|
|
Ratio of Gross Expenses to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.39 | %(e) |
|
|
| 0.55 | % |
|
|
| 1.11 | % |
|
|
| 5.85 | %(e) |
|
Ratio of Net Expenses to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.20 | %(e) |
|
|
| 0.20 | % |
|
|
| 0.16 | % |
|
|
| 0.16 | %(e) |
|
Ratio of Net Expenses, Excluding Interest Expense, to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.20 | %(e) |
|
|
| 0.19 | % |
|
|
| 0.16 | % |
|
|
| 0.16 | %(e) |
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 2.08 | %(e) |
|
|
| 2.31 | % |
|
|
| 2.88 | % |
|
|
| 2.70 | %(e) |
|
Portfolio turnover rate |
|
|
| 17 | %(d) |
|
|
| 43 | % |
|
|
| 20 | % |
|
|
| 55 | %(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| ||||
|
| July 22, 2010 (a) |
| |||
|
|
| ||||
|
| (unaudited) |
| |||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
|
| $ | 25.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income from Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
|
| 0.29 |
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain on investments |
|
|
| 1.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total from Investment Operations |
|
|
| 2.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from Net Investment Income |
|
|
| (0.19 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Dividends |
|
|
| (0.19 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
|
| $ | 27.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Return (c) |
|
|
| 8.73 | %(d) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
|
| $ | 113,882 |
|
|
Ratio of Gross Expenses to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.62 | %(e) |
|
Ratio of Net Expenses to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.51 | %(e) |
|
Ratio of Net Expenses, Excluding Interest Expense, to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 0.48 | %(e) |
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets |
|
|
| 5.00 | %(e) |
|
Portfolio turnover rate |
|
|
| 2 | %(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Commencement of operations | |
(b) | On October 24, 2008, each Fund effected a stock split as described in the Notes to Financial Statements. Per share data prior to this date has been adjusted to give effect to the stock split. | |
(c) | Total return is calculated assuming an initial investment of $10,000 made at the net asset value at the beginning of period, reinvestment of any dividends and distributions at net asset value on the dividend/distributions payment date and a redemption on the last day of the period. The return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund dividends/distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. | |
(d) | Not Annualized | |
(e) | Annualized |
See Notes to Financial Statements
58
|
October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
Note 1—Fund Organization—Market Vectors ETF Trust (the “Trust”), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company. The Trust was incorporated in Delaware as a statutory trust on March 15, 2001. The Trust operates as a series fund, and as of October 31, 2010, offers twenty eight investment portfolios, each of which represents a separate series of the Trust.
These financial statements relate only to the following investment portfolios: High-Yield Municipal Index ETF (“High-Yield”), Intermediate Municipal Index ETF (“Intermediate”), Long Municipal Index ETF (“Long”), Pre-Refunded Municipal Index ETF (“Pre-Refunded”), Short Municipal Index ETF (“Short”), and Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (“Emerging Markets”), each a “Fund” and collectively the “Funds”. Each Fund’s investment objective is to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of its Index. The Funds expect to use a sampling approach in seeking to achieve their objectives. Sampling means that Van Eck Associates Corporation (the “Adviser”) uses quantitative analysis to select bonds and other securities that represent a sample of securities in the Index in terms of key risk factors, performance attributes and other characteristics. The number of securities in each Fund will be based upon several factors, including asset size of the Fund. The Adviser generally expects each Fund to hold less than the total number of securities in the Index, but reserves the right to hold as many securities as it believes necessary to achieve the Fund’s investment objective.
The Fund’s commencement of operations dates and their respective Indices are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund |
|
| Commencement |
|
| Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
High-Yield |
| February 4, 2009 |
| Barclays Capital Municipal Custom High Yield Composite Index | |||
Intermediate |
| December 4, 2007 |
| Barclays Capital AMT-Free Intermediate Continuous Municipal Index | |||
Long |
| January 2, 2008 |
| Barclays Capital AMT-Free Long Continuous Municipal Index | |||
Pre-Refunded |
| February 2, 2009 |
| Barclays Capital Municipal Pre-Refunded–Treasury-Escrowed Index | |||
Short |
| February 22, 2008 |
| Barclays Capital AMT-Free Short Continuous Municipal Index | |||
Emerging Markets |
| July 22, 2010 |
| JP Morgan Government Bond Index-Emerging Markets Global Core |
Note 2–Significant Accounting Policies–The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Funds.
|
|
A. | Security Valuation–The investment valuation policy of the Funds is to value investments at fair value. Debt securities for which market quotations are readily available are valued on the basis of quotations furnished by an independent pricing service approved by the Board of Trustees or provided by securities dealers. The pricing services may use valuation models or matrix pricing, which consider: (i) yield or price with respect to bonds that are considered comparable in characteristics such as rating, interest rate and maturity date or (ii) quotations from bond dealers to determine current value. Over-the-counter securities for which no sale was reported are valued at the mean of the bid and ask prices. Securities for which market values are not readily available, or whose values have been affected by events occurring before the Funds’ pricing time (4:00 p.m. Eastern Time) but after the close of the securities’ primary market, are valued using methods approved by the Board of Trustees. The Funds may also fair value securities in other situations, for example, when a particular foreign market is closed but the Fund is open. The price which the Funds may realize upon sale of an investment may differ materially from the value presented on the Schedules of Investments. Money market fund investments are valued at net asset value. Short-term obligations purchased with more than sixty days remaining to maturity are valued at market value. Short-term obligations purchased with sixty days or less to maturity are valued at amortized cost, which with accrued interest approximates fair value. Securities for which quotations are not available are stated at fair value as determined by a Pricing Committee of the Adviser appointed by the Board of Trustees. Certain factors such as economic conditions, political events, market trends and security specific information are used to determine the fair value for these securities. |
59
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
(continued) |
|
|
| The Funds utilize various methods to measure the fair value of most of its investments on a recurring basis which includes a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below: |
|
|
| Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. |
|
|
| Level 2 - Significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.). |
|
|
| Level 3 - Significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
|
|
B. | Federal Income Taxes–It is each Fund’s policy to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute all of its taxable income to its shareholders. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. |
|
|
C. | Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders—Dividends to shareholders from net investment income, if any, are declared and paid at least monthly by each Fund. Distributions of net realized capital gains, if any, generally are declared and paid annually. Income dividends and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from such amounts determined in accordance with GAAP. |
|
|
D. | Currency Translation–Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and commitments under forward foreign currency contracts are translated into U.S. dollars at the closing prices of such currencies each business day. Purchases and sales of foreign denominated investments are translated at the exchange rates prevailing when such investments are acquired or sold. Foreign denominated income and expenses are translated at the exchange rates prevailing when accrued. The portion of realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that result from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed. Recognized gains or losses attributable to foreign currency fluctuations on foreign currency denominated assets, other than investments, and liabilities are recorded as net realized gains and losses from foreign currency transactions. |
|
|
E. | Restricted Securities–The Funds may invest in securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and expense, and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. Information regarding restricted securities is included at the end of each Fund’s Schedule of Investments. |
|
|
F. | Use of Derivative Instruments–The Funds may make investments in derivative instruments, including, but not limited to, options, futures, swaps and other derivatives relating to foreign currency transactions. A derivative is an instrument whose value is derived from underlying assets, indices, reference rates or a combination of these factors. Derivative instruments may be privately negotiated contracts (often referred to as over the counter (“OTC”) derivatives) or they may be listed and traded on an exchange. Derivative contracts may involve future commitments to purchase or sell financial instruments at specified terms on a specified date, or to exchange interest payment streams or currencies based on a notional or contractual amount. Derivative instruments may involve a high degree of financial risk. The use of derivatives also involves the risk of loss if the Adviser is incorrect in its expectation of the timing or level of fluctuations in securities prices, interest rates or currency prices. Investments in derivative instruments also include the risk of default by the counterparty, the risk that the investment may not be liquid and the risk that a small movement in the price of the underlying security or benchmark may result in a disproportionately large movement, unfavorable or favorable, in the price of the derivative instrument. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures about the Funds’ derivatives and hedging activities. Details of this disclosure are as follows: The impact of transactions in derivative instruments, during the period ended October 31, 2010, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Foreign exchange risk |
| |||
|
|
| ||||
Emerging Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign currency contracts1 |
|
| $ | 53,913 |
|
|
| |
|
|
1 | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain (loss) on forward foreign currency contracts and foreign currency transactions |
60
|
|
|
| Forward Foreign Currency Contracts–The Funds are subject to foreign currency risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The Funds may buy and sell forward foreign currency contracts to settle purchases and sales of foreign denominated securities to obtain currency exposure, or to hedge foreign denominated assets. Realized gains and losses from forward foreign currency contracts are included in realized gain (loss) on forward foreign currency contracts and foreign currency transactions. The Funds may incur additional risk from investments in forward foreign currency contracts if the counterparty is unable to fulfill its obligation or there are unanticipated movements of the foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar. The Funds did not have any open forward foreign currency contracts as of October 31, 2010. |
|
|
G. | Other–Security transactions are accounted for on trade date. Transactions in certain securities may take longer than the customary settlement cycle to be completed. The counterparty is required to collateralize such trades with cash in excess of the market value of the transaction, which is held at the custodian and marked to market daily. Realized gains and losses are calculated on the identified cost basis. Interest income, including amortization of premiums and discounts, is accrued as earned. |
|
|
Note 3—Investment Management and Other Agreements—The Adviser is the investment adviser to the Funds. The Adviser receives a management fee, calculated daily and payable monthly based on an annual rate of each Fund’s average daily net assets. The management fee rate for Emerging Markets is 0.35% and the Adviser has agreed, at least until September 1, 2011, to voluntarily waive or limit its fees and to assume as its own expense certain expenses otherwise payable so that its total annual operating expenses, excluding interest expense, does not exceed 0.49%. Effective September 1, 2010, High Yield, Intermediate, Long, Pre-Refunded and Short Funds adopted a unitary management fee where the Adviser is responsible for all expenses of the Funds, except the fee payment under the Investment Advisory Agreement, interest expenses, offering costs, trading expenses, taxes and extraordinary expenses. Prior to September 1, 2010, these Funds were responsible for their own operating expenses, including management fees. The management fee rate for these Funds was 0.25%, except for High Yield which had a rate of 0.50%. The Adviser voluntarily waived its fees and assumed certain fund expenses during this period to limit total annual operating expenses to the expense caps listed below. | |
| |
The current unitary management fee/expense caps and the amounts waived/assumed by the Adviser for the period ended October 31, 2010 are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fund |
|
| Unitary Management |
| Management |
| Expenses |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
High-Yield |
| 0.35%* |
|
| $160,203 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| |
Intermediate |
| 0.24%* |
|
| 98,543 |
|
|
| — |
|
| |
Long |
| 0.24%* |
|
| 46,925 |
|
|
| 37,786 |
|
| |
Pre-Refunded |
| 0.24%* |
|
| 32,029 |
|
|
| 21,976 |
|
| |
Short |
| 0.20%* |
|
| 78,047 |
|
|
| 13,419 |
|
| |
Emerging Markets |
| 0.49% |
|
| 19,878 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
* | Represents Fund expense caps for the period prior to the adoption of the unitary management fee. |
In addition, Van Eck Securities Corporation, an affiliate of the Adviser, acts as the Funds’ Distributor. Certain officers and a Trustee of the Trust are officers, directors or stockholders of the Adviser and Distributor.
Note 4–Investments–For the period ended October 31, 2010, the cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investments other than U.S. government obligations and short-term obligations (excluding capital share transactions described in Note 6) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund |
|
| Cost of |
| Proceeds |
| ||
|
|
|
| |||||
| ||||||||
High-Yield |
| $ | 89,689,290 |
| $ | 35,108,661 |
| |
Intermediate |
|
| 74,882,810 |
|
| 10,922,437 |
| |
Long |
|
| 20,363,309 |
|
| 1,489,437 |
| |
Pre-Refunded |
|
| 6,820,146 |
|
| 8,506,286 |
| |
Short |
|
| 30,818,700 |
|
| 15,874,360 |
| |
Emerging Markets |
|
| 102,959,991 |
|
| 1,651,145 |
|
61
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
(continued) |
Note 5–Income Taxes–As of October 31, 2010, for Federal income tax purposes, the identified cost of investments owned, net unrealized appreciation (depreciation), gross unrealized appreciation, and gross unrealized depreciation of investments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund |
|
| Cost of Investments |
| Gross Unrealized |
| Gross Unrealized |
| Net Unrealized |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
High-Yield |
| $ | 196,744,193 |
| $ | 21,798,462 |
| $ | (5,231,382 | ) | $ | 16,567,080 |
| |
Intermediate |
|
| 217,500,608 |
|
| 7,877,683 |
|
| (401,090 | ) |
| 7,476,593 |
| |
Long |
|
| 68,208,266 |
|
| 3,683,870 |
|
| (134,869 | ) |
| 3,549,001 |
| |
Pre-Refunded |
|
| 36,647,887 |
|
| 763,978 |
|
| (21,212 | ) |
| 742,766 |
| |
Short |
|
| 101,058,934 |
|
| 2,386,139 |
|
| (68,009 | ) |
| 2,318,130 |
| |
Emerging Markets |
|
| 107,783,306 |
|
| 3,622,816 |
|
| (248,300 | ) |
| 3,374,516 |
|
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the period ended October 31, 2010 and April 30, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tax-Exempt Dividends |
| Ordinary Income |
| Long-Term |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Fund |
|
| October 31, 2010 |
| April 30, 2010 |
| October 31, 2010 |
| April 30, 2010 |
| April 30, 2010 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
High-Yield |
| $ | 5,082,600 |
| $ | 6,381,569 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 70,131 |
| $ | — |
| |
Intermediate |
|
| 3,075,400 |
|
| 3,174,300 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 19,600 |
| |
Long |
|
| 1,272,150 |
|
| 1,800,225 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |
Pre-Refunded |
|
| 255,400 |
|
| 419,300 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |
Short |
|
| 958,000 |
|
| 1,124,900 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |
Emerging Markets |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 472,000 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
The Funds recognize the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained assuming examination by applicable tax authorities. Management has analyzed the Funds’ tax positions, and has concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns filed for open tax years (tax years ended April 30, 2008, 2009 and 2010), or expected to be taken in the Funds’ current tax year. Therefore, no provision for income tax is required in the Funds’ financial statements.
Note 6—Capital Share Transactions—As of October 31, 2010, there were an unlimited number of capital shares of beneficial interest authorized by the Trust with no par value. Shares are issued and redeemed by the Funds only in Creation Units, consisting of 100,000 shares, except for Emerging Markets which has Creation Units consisting of 200,000 shares, or multiples thereof. The consideration for the purchase or redemption of Creation Units of the Funds generally consists of the in-kind contribution or distribution of securities constituting the Funds’ underlying index plus a small amount of cash. For the period ended October 31, 2010 the Trust had in-kind contributions as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund |
|
| In-Kind Contributions |
| |||
|
|
| |||||
Emerging Markets |
|
|
| $6,575,423 |
|
|
Note 7–Concentration and Other Risks–The investment objective of each Fund is to seek investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of its underlying index, as indicated in the name of each Fund. The Adviser uses a “passive” or index approach to achieve each Fund’s investment objective. The Funds use a sampling approach in which the Adviser uses quantitative analysis to select bonds that represent a sample of securities in the index in terms of key risk factors, performance attributes and other characteristics. Each Fund is classified as a non-diversified fund under the 1940 Act. Non-diversified funds generally hold securities of fewer issuers than diversified funds and may be more susceptible to the risks associated with these particular issuers, or to a single economic, political or regulatory occurrence affecting these issuers. Investments in municipal securities involve risks similar to those of investing in any fund of fixed income securities traded on exchanges, such as market fluctuations caused by factors such as economic and political developments, changes in interest rates and perceived trends in security prices.
High-Yield invests in non-investment grade securities, often referred to as “junk bonds.” Economic downturns may disrupt the high yield market and impair the ability of issuers to repay principal and interest. These high yield securities may involve greater risks and considerations not typically associated with investing in U.S. government bonds and other high quality fixed-income securities. Also, an increase in interest rates would likely have an adverse impact on the value of such obligations. Moreover, high yield securities may be less liquid due to the extent that there is no established retail secondary market and because of a decline in the value of such securities. High-Yield may not be able to sell bonds at desired prices
62
|
and that large purchases or sales of certain high-yield bond issues may cause substantial fluctuations in share price, yield and total return.
Emerging Markets invests in foreign securities. Investments in foreign securities may involve a greater degree of risk than investments in domestic securities due to political, economic or social instability. Foreign investments may also be subject to foreign taxes and settlement delays. Since Emerging Markets may have significant investments in foreign debt securities, it may be subject to greater credit and interest risks and greater currency fluctuations than portfolios with significant investments in domestic debt securities.
In the normal course of business, the Funds enter into contracts that contain a variety of general indemnifications. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Funds that have not yet occurred. However, the Adviser believes the risk of loss under these arrangements to be remote.
Note 8–Trustee Deferred Compensation Plan–The Trust has a Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) for Trustees under which the Trustees can elect to defer receipt of their trustee fees until retirement, disability or termination from the Board of Trustees. The fees otherwise payable to the participating Trustees are deemed invested in shares of the Funds as directed by the Trustees.
The expense for the deferred compensation plan is included in “Trustees fees and expenses” in the Statements of Operations. The liability for the deferred compensation plan is shown as “Deferred Trustee fees” in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
Note 9—Stock Split—On October 10, 2008, the Board of Trustees of the Market Vectors ETF Trust approved a split of the shares for Intermediate, Long, and Short. The stock splits took place for shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 21, 2008, and were payable on October 23, 2008. Fund shares began trading on a split-adjusted basis on October 24, 2008. Intermediate split its shares five-for-one, Long split its shares five-for-one, and Short split its shares three-for-one.
The splits lowered the share price of these Funds by increasing the number of shares outstanding, but did not change the total value of shares outstanding. The expected primary benefit of this action was that lower share prices will make these Funds more accessible to investors.
Note 10–Bank Line of Credit–The Funds may participate in a $20 million committed credit facility (“Facility”) to be utilized for temporary financing until the settlement of sales or purchases of portfolio securities, the repurchase or redemption of shares of the Funds at the request of the shareholders and other temporary or emergency purposes. The Funds have agreed to pay commitment fees, pro rata, based on the unused but available balance. Interest is charged to the Funds at rates based on prevailing market rates in effect at the time of borrowings. During the period ended October 31, 2010, there were no borrowings by the Funds under this Facility.
Note 11—Custodian Fees—The Funds have entered into an expense offset agreement with the custodian wherein they receive a credit toward the reduction of custodian fees whenever there are uninvested cash balances. The Funds could have invested their cash balances elsewhere if they had not agreed to a reduction in fees under the expense offset agreement with the custodian. For the period ended October 31, 2010, the Funds’ did not have any expense offsets to reduce custodian fees.
Note 12—Subsequent Events—The Funds have evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through the date the financial statements were issued.
63
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
(continued) |
|
The following dividends from net investment income were declared and paid subsequent to October 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund |
|
| Ex-Date |
| Record Date |
| Payable Date |
| Per Share |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
High-Yield |
| 11/1/10 |
| 11/3/10 |
| 11/5/10 |
| $ | 0.140 |
| |
Intermediate |
| 11/1/10 |
| 11/3/10 |
| 11/5/10 |
| $ | 0.061 |
| |
Long |
| 11/1/10 |
| 11/3/10 |
| 11/5/10 |
| $ | 0.067 |
| |
Pre-Refunded |
| 11/1/10 |
| 11/3/10 |
| 11/5/10 |
| $ | 0.028 |
| |
Short |
| 11/1/10 |
| 11/3/10 |
| 11/5/10 |
| $ | 0.029 |
| |
Emerging Markets |
| 11/1/10 |
| 11/3/10 |
| 11/5/10 |
| $ | 0.100 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
High-Yield |
| 12/1/10 |
| 12/3/10 |
| 12/7/10 |
| $ | 0.153 |
| |
Intermediate |
| 12/1/10 |
| 12/3/10 |
| 12/7/10 |
| $ | 0.061 |
| |
Long |
| 12/1/10 |
| 12/3/10 |
| 12/7/10 |
| $ | 0.073 |
| |
Pre-Refunded |
| 12/1/10 |
| 12/3/10 |
| 12/7/10 |
| $ | 0.027 |
| |
Short |
| 12/1/10 |
| 12/3/10 |
| 12/7/10 |
| $ | 0.028 |
| |
Emerging Markets |
| 12/1/10 |
| 12/3/10 |
| 12/7/10 |
| $ | 0.105 |
|
64
|
For the Period Ended October 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
At a meeting held on June 25, 2010 (the “Renewal Meeting”), the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, approved an amended and restated investment management agreement between the Trust and the Adviser (the “Municipal Investment Management Agreement”) with respect to the Market Vectors California Long Municipal Index ETF, High-Yield Municipal Index ETF, Intermediate Municipal Index ETF, Long Municipal Index ETF, Massachusetts Municipal Index ETF, New Jersey Municipal Index ETF, New York Long Municipal Index ETF, Ohio Municipal Index ETF, Pennsylvania Municipal Index ETF, Pre-Refunded Municipal Index ETF and Short Municipal Index ETF (the “Municipal Funds”) and the continuation of the investment management agreement between the Trust and the Adviser (the “Fixed Income Investment Management Agreement”) with respect to Market Vectors Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF, Fixed Income I ETF, Fixed Income II ETF and Investment-Grade Floating-Rate Bond ETF (collectively, the “Fixed Income Funds” and together with the Municipal Funds, the “Funds”). The Municipal Investment Management Agreement and the Fixed Income Investment Management Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Investment Management Agreements.”
The Board’s approval of the Investment Management Agreements was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information available to the Trustees and was not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations and how the Trustees considered those factors are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently, giving different weights to various factors.
In preparation for the Renewal Meeting, the Trustees met on June 9, 2010. At that meeting, the Trustees discussed the information the Adviser and Lipper Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent third party data provider, had provided to them in advance. The information provided to the Trustees included, among other things, information about the performance and expenses of the Funds and the Funds’ peer funds, information about the advisory services provided to the Funds, including the personnel providing those services, and the profitability and other benefits enjoyed by the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser’s relationship with the Funds.
The Independent Trustees’ consideration of the Investment Management Agreements was also based on their review of information obtained through discussions with, among others, management of the Funds and the Adviser at the Renewal Meeting and the June 9, 2010 meeting, and information obtained at other meetings of the Trustees among themselves and/or with management, including the background and experience of the portfolio managers and others involved in the management and administration of the Trust.
In evaluating the terms of the Investment Management Agreement relating to the Municipal Funds and the proposal for those Funds to adopt a unitary fee structure, the Trustees considered representations from the Adviser that the services to be provided by the Adviser to the Municipal Funds would not decrease in scope or quality under a unitary fee structure arrangement. The Trustees also considered the risks being assumed by the Adviser under the unitary fee structure arrangement and the potential expense stability that may inure to the benefit of shareholders of the Municipal Funds.
The Trustees considered the terms of, and scope of services that the Adviser provides under, the Investment Management Agreements, including, with respect to the Fixed Income Funds, the Adviser’s commitment to waive certain fees and/or pay expenses of the Fixed Income Funds to the extent necessary to prevent the operating expenses of the Fixed Income Funds from exceeding agreed upon limits until at least September 1, 2011 and, with respect to the Municipal Funds, the Adviser’s agreement to pay all of the direct expenses of the Municipal Funds (excluding interest expense, offering costs, trading expenses, taxes and extraordinary expenses).
The Trustees concluded that the Adviser and its personnel have the requisite expertise and skill to manage the Funds’ portfolios, especially in light of the performance of those Funds that had commenced operations as of the date of the Renewal Meeting (the “Operating Funds”). In evaluating an Operating Fund’s performance, the Trustees assessed the Operating Funds’ performance based on how well the performance of an Operating Fund tracked the performance of its Underlying Index, using a variety of measurements in this regard, and concluded that the investment performance of the Funds was satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered information relating to the financial condition of the Adviser, the current status, as they understood it, of the Adviser’s compliance environment and the Adviser’s analysis of the Trust’s other service providers.
As noted above, the Trustees were also provided various data from Lipper comparing the Funds to other exchange-traded funds with respect to expenses, performance and tracking error. The Trustees noted that the information provided showed that one Fund had an expense ratio greater than the median of its peer group of funds. The Trustees noted, however, that the Fund had a relatively small asset base. The Trustees concluded, in light of this information and the other information
65
|
APPROVAL OF MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT |
(continued) |
available to them, that the fees paid by the Funds were reasonable in light of the quality of services received. The Trustees noted, however, that this comparative data, while generally helpful, was limited in its usefulness in many cases due to the lack of a large number of directly comparable exchange-traded funds.
The Trustees also considered information they received regarding the other benefits received by the Adviser from serving as adviser to the Funds and from providing administrative services to the Funds, and from an affiliate of the Adviser serving as distributor for the Funds.
The Trustees also considered information provided by the Adviser about the overall profitability of the Adviser and its profitability or loss in respect of each Fund that had commenced operations. The Trustees reviewed the information provided by the Adviser as to the extent to which economies of scale are realized as each Fund grows and whether current fee levels reflect economies of scale for the benefit of shareholders. The Trustees reviewed each Fund’s asset size, expense ratio and expense cap, if applicable, and noted that neither of the Investment Management Agreements provides for breakpoints in the advisory fee rates as asset levels in a Fund increase. The Trustees noted that the Funds were still relatively new products, which therefore made it difficult to quantify the potential variability in net assets and thus determine the sustainability of any potential economies of scale which may exist. Based on the foregoing and the other information available to them, the Trustees determined that the advisory fee rate for each Fund is reasonable and appropriate in relation to the current asset size of each Fund and the other factors discussed above and currently reflects an appropriate sharing of any economies of scale which may exist with shareholders. The Trustees also determined that the profits earned by the Adviser in respect of the Funds that were profitable to the Adviser were reasonable in light of the nature and quality of the services received by such Funds.
The Trustees did not consider historical information about the profitability of Market Vectors California Long Municipal Index ETF, Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF, Fixed Income I ETF, Fixed Income II ETF, Investment Grade Floating Rate Bond ETF, Massachusetts Municipal Index ETF, New Jersey Municipal Index ETF, New York Long Municipal Index ETF, Ohio Municipal Index ETF and Pennsylvania Municipal Index ETF to the Adviser because none of those Funds had commenced operations at the time of the Renewal Meeting. However, the Adviser agreed to provide the Trustees with profitability information in connection with future proposed continuances of the Investment Management Agreements relating to those Funds after those Funds had commenced operations. In addition, because none of those Funds had commenced operations, the Trustees were not in a position to consider the historical performance or the quality of services previously provided to each of those Funds although they concluded that the nature, quality, and extent of the services to be provided by the Adviser were appropriate based on the Trustees’ knowledge of the Adviser and its personnel and the operations of the other series of the Trust.
The Independent Trustees were advised by and met in executive session with their independent counsel at the Renewal Meeting and at their June 9, 2010 meeting as part of their consideration of the Investment Management Agreements.
In voting to approve the continuation of the Municipal Investment Management Agreement and the Fixed Income Investment Management Agreement, the Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, concluded that the terms of each Investment Management Agreement are reasonable and fair in light of the services to be performed, the fees paid by certain other funds, expenses to be incurred and such other matters as the Trustees considered relevant in the exercise of their reasonable judgment. The Trustees further concluded that each Investment Management Agreement is in the interest of the Funds and each Fund’s shareholders.
66
|
|
|
|
| This report is intended for the Funds’ shareholders. It may not be distributed to prospective investors unless it is preceded or accompanied by a Market Vectors ETF Trust (the “Trust”) Prospectus and Summary Prospectus, which includes more complete information. An investor should consider the investment objective, risks, and charges and expenses of the Funds carefully before investing. The prospectus and summary prospectus contains this and other information about the investment company. Please read the prospectus and summary prospectus carefully before investing. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Additional information about the Trust’s Board of Trustees/Officers and a description of the policies and procedures the Trust uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities are provided in the Statement of Additional Information. The Statement of Additional Information and information regarding how the Trust voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve month period ending June 30 is available, without charge, by calling 1.888.MKT.VCTR, or by visiting vaneck.com, or on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov. |
| |
|
|
| |
| The Trust files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Trust’s Form N-Qs are available on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1.202.942.8090. The Funds’ complete schedules of portfolio holdings are also available by calling 1.888.MKT.VCTR or by visiting vaneck.com. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Investment Adviser: | ||
| Van Eck Associates Corporation | ||
|
| ||
| Distributor: | ||
| Van Eck Securities Corporation | ||
|
| ||
| Account Assistance: |
Item 2. CODE OF ETHICS. Not applicable. Item 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT. Not applicable. Item 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. Not applicable. Item 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS. Not applicable. Item 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS. Information included in Item 1. Item 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. Not applicable. Item 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGER OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. Not applicable. Item 9. PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS. Not applicable. Item 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. None. Item 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. (a) The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Market Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF, Intermediate Municipal Index ETF, Long Municipal Index ETF, Short Municipal Index ETF, Pre-Refunded Municipal Index ETF and Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act) provide reasonable assurances that material information relating to the Market Vectors ETF Trust is made known to them by the appropriate persons, based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report. (b) There were no significant changes in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls over financial reporting subsequent to the date of our evaluation. Item 12. EXHIBITS. (a)(1) Not applicable. (a)(2) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2 under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2) is attached as Exhibit 99.CERT. (b) Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is furnished as Exhibit 99.906CERT.SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. (Registrant) MARKET VECTORS ETF TRUST By (Signature and Title) /s/ Bruce J. Smith, SVP and CFO ------------------------------- Date January 6, 2011 --------------- Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. By (Signature and Title) /s/ Jan F. van Eck, CEO -------------------------- Date January 6, 2011 --------------- By (Signature and Title) /s/ Bruce J. Smith, CFO --------------------------- Date January 6, 2011 ---------------