As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on 7/09/2009
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-10405
Alpine Series Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
615 East Michigan Street
3rd Floor
Milwaukee, WI 53202
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Samuel A. Lieber
Alpine Woods Capital Investors, LLC
2500 Westchester Avenue, Suite 215
Purchase, NY 10577
(Name and address of agent for service)
1-888-785-5578
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
Date of fiscal year end: 10/31/2009
Date of reporting period: 4/30/2009
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
EQUITY & INCOME FUNDS
Semi-Annual Report
April 30, 2009
Alpine Dynamic Innovators Fund
Alpine Dynamic Transformations Fund
Alpine Dynamic Balance Fund
Alpine Accelerating Dividend Fund
Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund
Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund
Alpine Dynamic Financial Services Fund
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund
|
|
TABLEOF CONTENTS | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 21 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 27 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 33 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 37 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 58 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 61 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 64 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 65 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 73 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 82 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alpine’s Investment Outlook |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this semi-annual update for the period ending April 30, 2009. The past six months have challenged both investors and investment managers with unparalleled complexity, uncertainty and velocity. The nearly unprecedented disruption of the capital markets from September through March reflects the structural problems afflicting global finance and the resulting impact on employment and production. Excessive financial leverage accumulated over the previous three years may have set the stage for the economic unraveling which occurred in the wake of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy. In response, Central Banks around the world have taken extreme measures to maintain liquid short-term monetary functions. This appears to have stabilized the financial system. While the pendulum of financial liquidity has swung from excess to drought and now towards equilibrium, many pressures and imbalances persist. These may require fresh approaches to capital allocation and global interaction, which implies more rigorous regulation before sustained long-term growth can be achieved in the U.S. and Europe. Nonetheless, there are pockets of economic vigor which have been increasingly visible as the public equity and debt markets are currently the principal suppliers of fresh capital for commerce.
EQUITY PERFORMANCE RECALIBRATES
It is ironic that some of 2008’s most penalized stock markets and currencies have, in fact, been able to decouple during this crisis from the historical economic dominance of the U.S. and Europe, which together account for roughly 48% of global gross domestic product (GDP). In a number of countries, the sustainability of domestic consumption and fixed investment to develop modern infrastructure, efficient agriculture and higher education appears to have partially offset the declining demand for exports. With a broad recovery in commodity prices and related stocks, the so-called BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries, among other emerging markets, have experienced the strongest equity returns in 2009 in anticipation of superior growth prospects.
In contrast, the more constrained economies of the U.S., Europe and Japan have been most impacted by their banks and financial structures, which face capital reallocation pressures as informal or private market activities are reigned in. This so called ‘Shadow Banking’ system has been contracting rapidly, requiring massive capital injections from Central Banks to offset this erosion of wealth. Since this was a huge provider of cheap capital, it was a major driver of our economic growth over the past 5-10 years. Until the debt capital markets can be fully reconstituted, new lending limits and high government borrowings may reduce recovery prospects over the next three to five years.
Having just returned from India and China, as we supplement our regular dialogue with local market participants around the world, it is clear that these economies have maintained solid growth rates by enhancing domestic demand with Government stimulus packages until the broader global recovery begins. High household savings and currency reserves may sustain this capacity for several years. This has been reflected in superior stock market performances for 2009 to date. Even though a visible recovery in the U.S., Europe or Japan has not yet begun, their stock indices are higher because pricing during October through March likely anticipated far greater economic distress than we have to date experienced. Meanwhile, the recent run-up in long-term U.S. Government Treasury bond yields has been attributed to fears that a potential economic recovery in combination with current stimulation of monetary policy will lead to excess inflation. This has steepened the yield curve beyond historic norms given the still low money market yields, however, the spread between 10-year Treasury bills and similar maturity Treasury inflation protected securities (T.I.P.S.) is below 2%, suggesting little long term concern among investors. As with the recent rebound of equities from overly pessimistic levels, we suspect that this adjustment in Treasury yields reflects diminished risk aversion from an extreme level to more traditional expectations. In both cases, developed market debt and equity markets may be overshooting as they adjust from previously oversold conditions. It is clear that the Federal Reserve
1
and the world’s other central banks are not focused on these anticipatory price swings, and will likely maintain easy monetary conditions through stimulative policies until a durable recovery is evident.
BUSINESS PROSPECTS
Alpine’s view is that the U.S. economy may see a recovery in the second half of this year, which continues into 2010. However, its durability may be suspect. The pace of unemployment increases may slow this summer and could top out either later this year or early next. However, a near-term catalyst for new job formation and income growth is difficult to see. The household savings rate has improved from nil to over 5%, but is still well below the near 15% peak experienced in 1975. During the 1970’s, household debt represented roughly 60% of income, whereas it represented almost 120% of income by 2007. This suggests that the current deleveraging of household balance sheets will likely continue even if it does not go to the peak levels of the 1970’s. In this context, cautious consumption may continue to permeate the American psyche in ways that we cannot as yet measure, so stabilization is hard to forecast. Given this level of uncertainty over domestic demand drivers, it is not clear whether less volatile capital markets will have a dramatic impact on new fixed investment in upgrading the productive capacity of business, or even into research and development expenditures. Meanwhile, the de facto forced deleveraging of our economy through rising home foreclosures, and individual loan and credit card defaults may continue to limit our economic growth over the next 12 or so months. In aggregate, the combination of personal wealth erosion, diminished buying power and reduced business investment may be greater than the Obama stimulus package can offset. Thus, cheap and plentiful dollars may be needed to buttress the financial system for potentially the next few years until job creation resumes. Meanwhile, the ‘output gap’, or excess productive capacity of our economy should help to mitigate any inflationary inputs from ‘printing money’ or perhaps a weak dollar.
While low interest rates can be supportive of earnings multiples, investors will likely focus on stocks where earnings have the potential to grow faster than the broader economy. This is not to say that so-called “growth stocks” will be in favor because many are now ex-growth. Rather, we are keen to focus on companies which have the potential to grow revenues or margins as a result of either innovative products, enhanced profitability or other factors which might transform their business prospects. Naturally, we will continue to
focus on companies which should benefit from sectors or countries where companies have ‘the wind at their backs’, providing favorable conditions for growth. Major sectors which will likely receive stimulus for growth include infrastructure, alternative energy, agriculture, environmental sciences and select technologies related to defense spending, medical services and the pharmaceutical space. Investment themes may also influence long-term opportunities and include population growth among different age cohorts, expanding urbanization, health and retirement savings prospects, as well as the broad restructuring of the financial markets. Countries whose long-term outlook Alpine favors include Brazil, China, India and several smaller emerging markets. An overarching theme will be a world in transition. Understanding the geopolitical, socioeconomic and demographic forces influencing these changes, be they global or local, may prove critical over the next few years.
NEW OPPORTUNITIES
We believe the old adage that change creates opportunity for those who prepare. Our analysts and portfolio managers have been actively examining industries and companies’ abilities to manage potential transitions. We have weighed the prospects of distinct sectors or companies with special attributes rather than choosing a basket or index of stocks derived simply from statistical dissection of the investment universe by market cap or investment style. Accordingly, Alpine has sought to provide investment vehicles which actively focus on meaningful opportunities created by a world in transition.
In this context, we are pleased to present in this report three new funds in Alpine’s line-up which began operation last November.
The Alpine Accelerating Dividend Fund builds on an area in which Alpine has long experience, namely equity dividends. This Fund is designed to invest in companies with histories of and continued potential for increased dividend payouts. Currently, many companies are cutting dividends. Nevertheless, a number of companies have continued to reward shareholders with dividend growth, which in many cases have been sustained by low relative pay-out ratios, high cash generating businesses, and modest medium term capital requirements. We believe such stocks, in which this Fund is designed to invest, could outperform over the long term and offer attractive total return prospects.
We launched the Alpine Emerging Markets Real Estate Fund last year in the face of an extreme sell-off of
2
emerging markets as fear gripped global investors who questioned the potential of decoupled economic activity. To the contrary, we believe the broadening domestic consumption of key emerging market countries may augment the superior economic growth rates fueled by rising populations, expanding urbanization and continued global competitiveness. Over time, this capacity should benefit from the growth of nascent consumer finance structures. As we have witnessed in many developed countries over the past 50 years, a growing middle class has been a primary driver of real estate activity. Rising demand for both quantity and quality should fuel the value creation process.
The Alpine Global Infrastructure Fund was created in response to our recognition that established economies must rebuild existing infrastructure and emerging markets must add new infrastructure. The scale of many projects will require increased use of joint public/private ownership enterprises which will either augment or, more likely, replace government infrastructure development. We have based our portfolio design and investment universe on the projected spending for different subsectors of infrastructure on a global basis. Segments include transportation, power generation and distribution, water and waste treatment, pipelines, communication networks, and related services. We expect that this sector may grow in overall importance to equity markets as the public capital market’s role expands. Because the development and operation of many infrastructure projects share long-term income producing characteristics of both real estate and utility companies, Alpine expects pension and retirement funds could focus on this sector.
An existing Alpine strategy which has received significant interest from investors over this past year is the Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund. This Fund has sought to provide limited volatility with higher tax adjusted yields than typical cash management investment options provide. This short duration, highly liquid Fund offers Alpine’s investors another meaningful way to structure their investment portfolios with desired levels of income, volatility and potential opportunity.
While we are early in the transition to a new business cycle, many opportunistic investments have already generated positive returns in this period. With a three to five year investment horizon, we are confident that investors should likely benefit significantly from equity investments. Nonetheless, Alpine anticipates continued challenges over the next twelve months as the pattern of recovery unfolds. We look forward to reporting on the progress of the Alpine Funds over the course of the year and continue to appreciate your interest in our endeavors. As investors in all of our Funds, we are working on all of our behalf. Thus, our focus remains on finding opportunities offering fundamental value today and strong growth potential for tomorrow.
Sincerely,
Samuel A. Lieber
President, Alpine Mutual Funds
|
Mutual fund investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible. |
|
The letter and those that follow represent the opinion of Alpine Funds management and are subject to change, are not guaranteed, and should not be considered recommendations to buy or sell any security. |
|
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. |
|
Please refer to the schedule of investments for fund holding information. Fund holdings and sector allocations are subject to change and should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk. |
|
The fund’s (Alpine Emerging Markets Real Estate Fund and Alpine Global Infrastructure Fund) investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses must be considered carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the investment company, and it may be obtained by calling 1-888-785-5578, or visiting www.alpinefunds.com. Read it carefully before investing. |
3
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
|
|
| Alpine Dynamic Balance Fund |
|
|
| Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund |
|
|
| Alpine Dynamic Financial Services Fund |
|
|
| Alpine Dynamic Innovators Fund |
|
|
| Alpine Dynamic Transformations Fund |
|
|
| Alpine Accelerating Dividend Fund |
|
|
Value of a $10,000 Investment
Alpine Dynamic Balance Fund
S&P 500 Index
$18,000
$17,000
$16,000
$15,000
$14,000
$13,000
$12,000
$11,000
$10,000
$9,000
$8,000
$7,000
$11,156
$7,928
Jun 7
01
Apr 30
02
Apr 30
03
Apr 30
04
Apr 30
05
Apr 30
06
Apr 30
07
Apr 30
08
Apr 30
09
This chart represents a comparison of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark. The graph and the table do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Investment performance reflects the waiver and recovery of certain fees. Without the waiver and recovery of fees, the Fund’s total return would have differed.
Performance data quoted represents past performance and is not predictive of future results. Investment return and principal value of the Fund fluctuate, so that the shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance current to the most recent month end may be lower or higher than performance quoted and may be obtained by calling 1-888-785-5578. Performance data shown does not reflect the 1.00% redemption fee imposed on shares held for fewer than 2 months. If it did, total returns would be reduced.
The S&P 500 Index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. The Lipper Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Funds Average is an average of Funds that, by portfolio practice, maintain a mix of between 60%–80% equity securities, with the remainder invested in bonds, cash, and cash equivalents. Lipper Rankings for the periods shown are based on Fund total returns with dividends and distributions reinvested and do not reflect sales charges. The S&P 500 Index and the Lipper Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Funds Average are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment adviser fees. The performance for the Dynamic Balance Fund reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot directly invest in an index.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Comparative Annualized Returns as of 4/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 6 Months (1) |
| 1 Year |
| 3 Years |
| 5 Years |
| Since Inception |
| ||
Alpine Dynamic Balance Fund |
| -0.22 |
|
| -29.97 |
| -11.42 |
| -2.03 |
| 1.40 |
|
|
S&P 500 Index |
| -8.53 |
|
| -35.31 |
| -10.76 |
| -2.70 |
| -2.90 |
|
|
Lipper Mixed Asset Target Allocation Growth |
| -1.74 |
|
| -27.07 |
| -7.16 |
| -0.58 |
| -0.29 |
|
|
Lipper Mixed Asset Target Allocation Growth |
| — |
|
| 497/677 |
| 497/539 |
| 366/445 |
| 42/293 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Not annualized. FINRA does not recognize rankings for less than one year. |
6
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Balance Fund | |
Portfolio Distributions* (Unaudited)
U.S. Govt Obligations 21.1%
Utilities 4.6%
Cash & Cash Equivalents 13.7%
Consumer Discretionary 7.5%
Consumer Staples 5.6%
Energy 2.0%
Financial 18.6%
Health Care 5.2%
Industrials 13.6%
Information Technology 0.2%
Materials 7.9%
|
|
|
|
1. | U.S. Treasury Bond, |
|
|
| 5.250%, 11/15/2028 | 9.17% |
|
2. | U.S. Treasury Bond, |
|
|
| 6.000%, 02/15/2026 | 7.42% |
|
3. | U.S. Treasury Note, |
|
|
| 5.000%, 08/15/2011 | 4.34% |
|
4. | CONSOL Energy, Inc. | 3.36% |
|
5. | Johnson & Johnson | 2.81% |
|
6. | Eagle Materials, Inc. | 2.72% |
|
7. | Allegheny Energy, Inc. | 2.63% |
|
8. | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 2.62% |
|
9. | CVS Caremark Corp. | 2.53% |
|
10. | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 2.30% |
|
|
|
* | Portfolio holdings and sector distributions are as of 4/30/09 and are subject to change. Portfolio holdings are not recommendations to buy or sell any securities. Top 10 Holdings do not include short-term investments. Portfolio Distributions percentages are based on total investments and Top 10 Holdings percentages are based on total net assets. |
|
Commentary |
Dear Investor:
The Alpine Dynamic Balance Fund provided a total return of -0.22% in the first half of our fiscal year, ending April 30, 2009. This compares with the decline of 8.53% for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and 9.37% for the Dow Jones Industrial Average. These six months were generally an adverse period for equity values. The Fund had an offset to these declines in its significant position in United States government obligations and, at end of the fiscal period, in cash equivalents. At April 30 these defensive holdings totaled 35.8% of the portfolio value.
The period under review was, from the point of view of investment management, among the most challenging of recent decades. It began with a widespread conviction that an economic crisis was in progress. Equity prices, as measured by the Dow Jones Industrial Average, fell sharply until a bottom was reached on November 21, 2008. Then, many equities snapped back, with substantial percentage gains until January 6, 2009. This rally was supported by new optimism that the change of United States Administration and Congress would facilitate necessary economic stimulation. It was supported by the continued easing of interest rates. In January, initial expectations of new economic policies were not immediately met and attention shifted to the deteriorating industrial, employment and credit situations. Initial proposals by the Secretary of the Treasury for new banking support were met with disappointment. The corporate earnings reports for the
period ended December 31 led to further disappointment and apprehension in January and February. Then, on March 6 new policy declarations from the Administration led to a renewal of interest in equities. From March 6 to April 30, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Average increased 28%. Many stocks rose 50% or more from their severely depressed levels. The fixed income market, led by U.S. Treasuries, reached its peak in mid-March and slowly declined thereafter. We believe this recital of the record is relevant because it explains the challenges met by the Fund and the degree to which, in our view, volatile conditions were not reflecting the longer term values on which the Fund’s portfolio selection is based.
To demonstrate the investment volatility during this six-month period, we compared the 10 top performers with the 10 bottom performers. The following were the 10 top equity performers:
|
|
|
|
Temple-Inland Corp. |
| +112.5 | % |
Fidelity National Financial Corp. |
| +105.3 | % |
Darden Restaurants Inc. |
| +68.9 | % |
Eagle Materials Inc. |
| +58.5 | % |
Forestar Group Inc. |
| +46.8 | % |
Student Loan Corp. |
| +42.2 | % |
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. |
| +30.8 | % |
Wesco International |
| +30.8 | % |
J.C. Penney |
| +26.5 | % |
Diamond Rock Hospitality |
| +25.3 | % |
Each of these companies had come under severe pressure in 2008 and then rebounded with the March through April recovery.
7
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Balance Fund | |
Turning to the bottom performers, we see a less diversified group of holdings, led primarily by financial institutions. The bottom 10 were as follows:
|
|
|
Webster Financial Corp. of Connecticut | -71.6% |
|
Guaranty Financial Group | -70.5% |
|
Developers Diversified Realty Corp. | -66.2% |
|
Ambac Financial Group Inc. | -65.5% |
|
Bank of America Corp. | -62.1% |
|
PennVirginia Corp. | -61.9% |
|
MBIA Inc. | -51.9% |
|
Bank of Florida | -47.5% |
|
Wells Fargo & Co. | -39.4% |
|
Norfolk Southern Corp. | -39.1% |
|
Viewing these disparate results, it is quite clear that the financial related group remained under significant pressure while diversified, commercial and industrial companies began a meaningful recovery.
The traditionally defensive equity holdings in healthcare and utilities did not participate significantly in the market recovery trends, although many were under pressure in the 2008 fall. Thus, some of the Fund’s major holdings in healthcare, like Johnson & Johnson, Becton Dickinson, CVS and Walgreen remained in a narrow range.
A variety of moves were made to potentially enhance the portfolio. Illustratively, General Electric Company shares were bought on a scale down once the shares broke the traditional value range and especially after the dividend was cut by 50%. In November we purchased General Electric shares at $16.61, on March 9, at $7.44. Among banks, we added to our J.P. MorganChase position when it had fallen to $21.21 in January (April 30 it was selling at $35.00). We began
buying State Street Corp. at $39.70 on December 31 and bought it down to $31.50 on February 20 (at this writing $48.70). Several issues were held for only a short time, such as Deere & Co. purchased at $27.46 on March 4 and sold on March19 at $31.73. Considerable profits were taken in U.S. Treasury obligations ranging up to a 20% gain on $2 million of United States Treasury 6% bonds of 2026 originally bought in August of 2006 and sold on March 19. In total, realized gains during this six month period ending April 30, 2009 were $1,171,000 long term and short term losses were $176,733.
The portfolio strategies employed in this period were a combination of seeking defensive, protective investment with longer term potential and being reactive to changing fundamentals in the short-term environment. Buying the shares of General Electric after an unprecedented decline, or adding to the shares of a top quality consumer products company such as Colgate Palmolive after a modest price break, or establishing a new policy of selling call options to add to assets, all took advantage of volatility in a prudent manner. Looking ahead, we have positioned the portfolio to potentially benefit by seeking companies likely to outperform in an economy of modest recovery, while providing income and basic long-term growth prospects.
We appreciate the continuing support of our investors.
Sincerely,
Stephen A. Lieber
Samuel A. Lieber
Co-Portfolio Managers
Please refer to the schedule of portfolio investments for fund holdings information. Fund holdings and sector allocations are subject to change and should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.
Investing in this fund involves special risks, including but not limited to, options and futures transactions. Please refer to the prospectus for further details. Investments in debt securities typically decrease in value when interest rates rise. This risk is usually greater for longer-term debt securities.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is an unmanaged index of common stocks comprised of major industrial companies and assumes reinvestment of dividends. The S&P 500 Index is a broad based unmanaged index of 500 stocks, which is widely recognized as representative of the equity market in general. You cannot invest directly in an index.
8
|
|
Value of a $10,000 Investment
Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund
S&P 500 Index
$9,925
$9,539
$22,000
$21,000
$20,000
$19,000
$18,000
$17,000
$16,000
$15,000
$14,000
$13,000
$12,000
$11,000
$10,000
$9,000
Sep 22
03
Oct 31
03
Apr 30
04
Oct 31
04
Apr 30
05
Oct 31
05
Apr 30
06
Oct 31
06
Apr 30
07
Oct 31
07
Apr 30
08
Oct 31
08
Apr 30
09
Performance data quoted represents past performance and is not predictive of future results. Investment return and principal value of the Fund fluctuate, so that the shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance current to the most recent month end may be lower or higher than performance quoted and may be obtained by calling 1-888-785-5578. Performance data shown does not reflect the 1.00% redemption fee imposed on shares held for fewer than 2 months. If it did, total returns would be reduced.
The S&P 500 Index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. The Lipper Equity Income Funds Average is an average of funds that seek relatively high current income and income growth through investing 60% or more of their respective portfolios in equities. Lipper Rankings for the periods shown are based on Fund total returns with dividends and distributions reinvested and do not reflect sales charges. The S&P 500 Index and the Lipper Equity Income Funds Average are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment adviser fees. The performance for the Dynamic Dividend Fund reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot directly invest in an index.
| |
| |
Comparative Annualized Returns as of 4/30/09 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 Months (1) |
| 1 Year |
| 3 Years |
| 5 Years |
| Since Inception | |
Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund |
| -9.66 |
|
| -46.68 |
| -16.99 |
| -4.26 |
| -0.13% |
S&P 500 Index |
| -8.53 |
|
| -35.31 |
| -10.76 |
| -2.70 |
| -0.84% |
Lipper Equity Income Fund Average |
| -9.06 |
|
| -34.17 |
| -10.20 |
| -1.66 |
| 0.60% |
Lipper Equity Income Fund Ranking |
| — |
|
| 291/294 |
| 222/233 |
| 151/180 |
| 113/160 |
|
|
|
(1) | Not annualized. FINRA does not recognize rankings for less than one year. |
9
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund | |
Portfolio Distributions* (Unaudited)
Information Technology 9.2%
Materials 11.5%
Telecommunication 7.7%
Utilities 9.2%
Cash & Cash Equivalents 7.5%
Consumer Discretionary 9.8%
Consumer Staples 16.8%
Energy 9.0%
Financial 6.3%
Health Care 8.1%
Industrials 4.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
| Deutsche Telekom AG |
| 2.68% |
|
2. |
| Monsanto Co. |
| 2.52% |
|
3. |
| Endesa SA |
| 2.23% |
|
4. |
| ITC Holdings Corp. |
| 2.21% |
|
5. |
| Molson Coors Brewing Co. |
| 2.18% |
|
6. |
| K&S AG |
| 2.18% |
|
7. |
| Microchip Technology, Inc. |
| 2.13% |
|
8. |
| Avon Products, Inc |
| 2.03% |
|
9. |
| Regal Entertainment Group - |
| 1.96% |
|
10. |
| Carrefour SA |
| 1.87% |
|
|
|
* | Portfolio holdings and sector distributions are as of 4/30/09 and are subject to change.Portfolio holdings are not recommendations to buy or sell any securities. Top 10 Holdings do not include short-term investments. Portfolio Distributions percentages are based on total investments and Top 10 Holdings percentages are based on total net assets. |
|
|
Commentary | |
ADVDX provided an attractive dividend yield in a very challenging dividend environment
The Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund (ADVDX) completed a challenging first half fiscal 2009 by achieving its primary objective of distributing attractive dividend income. Falling short of our objective of strong capital appreciation, ADVDX has been operating in a period of severe volatility and decreases in global equity markets throughout fiscal 2009. The dividends which we have sought to accumulate for the shareholders of this Fund are now fewer in number and in many cases the size of their dividends have been reduced. In recognition of this situation, we reduced the payout for the monthly dividend beginning in March, after considerable analysis to determine what we believe to be an achievable level going forward. We have intensified the dividend capture process during seasonal peak payment periods which naturally affects the holding periods surrounding the ex-dividend dates. A notable side effect could be the potential inability of the Fund to maintain the tax effectiveness of future Fund distributions since we no longer maintain a 61-day minimum investment period before rotating into a new dividend paying stock.
For the six months ended April 30, 2009, ADVDX’s NAV declined by 9.66% including dividend reinvestment versus an 8.53% decline in the S&P 500 Index and a 9.06% decline for the Lipper Equity Income Fund average for the same time period. ADVDX’s performance was impacted by a sharp decline in the
value of some of its smaller capitalization holdings and extreme volatility in its international markets as the global equity indices made new lows in March 2009.
Within this very challenging environment, we are pleased that we have continued to achieve our primary objective of providing a high level of dividend income for our investors. For the six months ended April 30, 2009, ADVDX paid a total dividend of $1.43 per share which was 100% earned dividend income. Based on a closing price of ADVDX of $4.51 on 4/30/09, the $1.43 dividend payout represents a substantial trailing twelve-month dividend yield. For the six months ended April 30, 2009, ADVDX paid a total of $0.65 in dividends per share which represents a trailing six month dividend yield of 14.4%. Since inception, investors in ADVDX have received a total of $8.44 per share in earned dividend income. These dividends paid need to be added back to NAV when looking at historical total return calculations.
We have just come through the third worst bear market on record in the US, with a 57% decline for the S&P 500 Index from its peak in early October 2007 through the recent lows on March 9, 2009. Only the 1930s recorded worse equity market performance than what we have experienced in the past 17 months. The first half of fiscal 2009 brought the worst economic recession since the 1980’s and a near collapse of the global financial system, so it is not surprising that we have also seen an unprecedented amount of dividend cuts.
10
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund | |
Companies across the globe have either cut or eliminated dividends in order to conserve cash amidst declining earnings and still tight capital markets. Some of the most well-known companies in the US across different sectors have slashed their dividends, including GE, Pfizer, Dow, JPMorgan, Macy’s and CBS. Internationally, we have experienced even more severe dividend cuts than we have seen in the U.S. Our internal study completed in May 2009 analyzed a universe of liquid, high yielding companies outside of the US and found that on average these companies cut their dividends by over 40%, with the weakest markets being Italy, France and Norway.
Throughout first half fiscal 2009, we have strived to balance our portfolio to weather this economic storm. With the tides and undercurrents changing rapidly, it has been an extremely difficult environment to be a long-only dividend investor that has to have a significant portion of assets invested at all times in order to generate our high dividend yield. However, we have worked to reposition the portfolio to be more diversified and more balanced to handle the turbulence with a barbell approach. By this we mean that we have kept our cyclical names where we feel the stocks offer tremendous value and are positioned to potentially benefit from a better outlook for growth in late 2009 and beyond. We have also maintained our more defensive positions in sectors like healthcare, consumer staples, utilities, and telecom which should perform well if global growth continues to be weak. We will discuss this more in our 2009 Outlook below.
ADVDX has paid a regular monthly minimum dividend of $0.07 per share. In addition, in the third month of each quarter the Fund distributes excess dividend income that has been earned and accumulated during the quarter. Due to the difficult dividend markets, we were faced with a decline in the amount of the excess dividend that we were able to earn for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. This resulted in a reduction in our March 2009 excess dividend payment to $0.05 per share from the $0.18 per share that we were able to pay in December 2008. Excluding our excess dividend payments, our regular $0.07 per share per month dividend represents an annualized dividend of payment of $0.84 which is still a very attractive yield based on ADVDX’s closing price of $4.51 on 4/30/09.
If we continue to see these depressed levels of dividend payments globally, it may be increasingly difficult to generate any excess dividend payment until market conditions become more favorable. In response to current market conditions, we have needed to increase the velocity of our dividend capture program in order to maintain our current $0.07 per share per month
dividend payout. This has resulted in the reduction of our average holding period and therefore decreasing the percentage of our dividend income which may be qualified for the reduced US Federal tax rates. We are actively monitoring the dividend environment and we will continue to work hard to find in our view the best dividend opportunities in these difficult markets.
International equity markets have been challenging, but we have continued to find dividend yields that are much higher than the US averages plus attractive potential growth opportunities
Despite significant dividend cuts around the globe, we have continued to find attractive growth opportunities and significantly larger dividend payouts overseas than we see in the U.S. ADVDX has a relatively larger exposure to overseas markets in comparison to the S&P 500 Index and our equity income peers. In addition to our multi-strategy and multi-cap approach, we invest on average approximately 25-35% of ADVDX’s assets in international equities. We do not actively manage our country weightings - we pick our holdings on a stock by stock basis based on dividend potential and total return. We search for attractive value opportunities in the U.S., Europe, Latin America, and Asia. This bottoms-up approach had taken a large portion of our international holdings to the Euro region, as the dividend payout ratios remain higher than any other region including the U.S.
As of April 30, 2009, ADVDX had invested 31.4% of net assets in international companies and 64.0% of its value in domestic US based companies, with the remaining 4.6% in cash and equivalents. However, we are continuously doing our homework and we have the flexibility in ADVDX to move our investments to where we see the greatest combination of value, growth, and dividends. For example, Europe has recently joined the US in more aggressive fiscal and monetary stimulus which has supported a rebound in European equities from the March lows. And we recently bought a basket of Chinese stocks listed in Hong Kong where we have found attractive yield and growth opportunities.
ADVDX is currently invested in equities based in 17 different countries, the majority of which would be considered mature countries. However we do have a small exposure to some emerging market economies and we continue to look for interesting dividend and capital appreciation opportunities in countries like Brazil and South Africa. Following the United States, our current top countries are Germany, France, Norway, Spain, and Israel. The average dividend yield for the major indices in these five countries is currently 5.22%versus the yield on the S&P 500 Index of 3.28%.
11
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund | |
Our investment approach combines three sub-strategies: Dividend Capture, Value, and Growth
Our number one priority continues to be to provide our investors with a very attractive dividend yield and to improve and grow our capital returns. We believe ADVDX offers a unique and balanced approach to achieving both dividend income and long-term growth of capital while offering investors diversification through international equity exposure. We scan the globe looking for what we feel are the best dividend opportunities for our investors, employing a multi-cap, multi-sector, and multi-style investment approach. The Fund combines three research-driven investment strategies — Dividend Capture, Value, and Growth — to maximize the amount of earned dividend income and to identify companies globally with the potential for dividend increases and capital appreciation.
Our “Dividend Capture Strategy” seeks to enhance the dividend income generated by the Fund
We run a portion of our portfolio with a dividend capture strategy, where we invest in typically high dividend yielding stocks or in special situations where large cash balances are being returned to shareholders as one-time special dividends. We enhance the dividend return of this portfolio by electively rotating a portion of our high yielding holdings after the 61-day ownership period required to obtain the reduced 15% dividend tax rate.
One of our top holdings as of April 30, 2009 announced a special dividend payment associated with a restructuring and we believe there is additional upside value to be realized following their dividend payment. Endesa SA (ELE SM) is one of Spain’s largest utilities that generates and distributes electricity throughout countries in Europe and Latin America. A controlling stake in Endesa was sold to Italy’s biggest utility company, Enel, in February 2009. As part of the sale, shareholders of Endesa received a $5.89 special dividend, or approximately 30% of the equity value of the company.
In our dividend capture, our largest holding at the end of fiscal first half 2009 was Deutsche Telekom (DTE GR) with a 10% annual dividend yield. Deutsche Telekom is the incumbent telecommunications provider in Germany with leading market positions in both fixed-line and mobile services. The company also has a broad international exposure with operations in the US, UK, Austria, Netherlands and the Czech Republic. The stock has been dragged down by the weak performance of its T-Mobile unit and by weak European economic outlook and we have significantly reduced our exposure following the receipt of our dividends.
Another large dividend capture holding included the French company Carrefour. Carrefour SA (CA FP) is the world’s second largest food retailer by revenue with an attractive annual dividend yield of 3.7%. Carrefour has operations in Europe, Latin America and Asia. They offer an appealing combination of a historically stable and strong cash flow from their core businesses in the developed economies plus exposure to emerging market growth which has currently generated about 20% of sales.
Our “Value/Restructuring Strategy” looks for attractively valued or restructuring dividend payers
Our second major strategy is what we call “value with a catalyst or restructuring strategy”, where our internal research points to under-valued or mis-priced equity opportunities for companies with attractive dividend yields. We also look for turnaround situations or depressed earnings where we believe there is a catalyst for an earnings recovery or a restructuring or major corporate action that is expected to add value. The key characteristic for this strategy is low valuations relative to historical averages and above average dividend yields for a combined objective of capital appreciation and high dividend income. We would categorize three of our top holdings in this strategy; Molson Coors Brewing, Regal Entertainment and Avon Products.
Molson Coors Brewing (TAP), based in Colorado, was formed through the merger of Coors Brewing & Molson Inc in early 2005. TAP is the world’s fifth-largest global brewer, with a leading market share in Canada and the UK and is the No. 3 player in the US. We believe TAP is well positioned for strong earnings growth based on solid organic growth, more aggressive pricing discipline, industry share gains, moderating input costs, and rising cash flows. Beer fundamentals look positive as economic concerns are resulting in market share gains versus wines and spirits. Also, drinkers have been trading down to domestic premium beers where TAP has a high market share. In addition, its 2008 sales and distribution joint venture with SABMiller in the US is expected to generate $500 million in cost synergies which begin to be realized in 2009. In May 2009, TAP raised its annual dividend by 20% at a time when a record number of companies where reducing and eliminating dividends due to the economic downturn. This follows on a 25% increase in the dividend in 2008. TAP offers a 2.2% current yield and we would expect additional dividend increases and capital appreciation potential going forward as merger synergies and fundamentals continues to improve.
12
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund | |
Regal Entertainment (RGC), based in Tennessee, with a 5.7% dividend yield is the largest theater owner in the U.S., generating 20% of total U.S. box office revenue. It is currently enjoying a rebound in theater attendance based on what has been perceived as higher quality movie selections. We expect the continued large-scale rollout of enhanced 3-D technology to theaters in 2009 and 2010 to act as a catalyst for an additional increase in movie attendance and an enhanced margin opportunity for Regal as 3-D movies command premium ticket prices.
Avon Products (AVP), based in New York City, manufactures and sells beauty, fashion, and home products directly to consumers worldwide through its workforce of independent sales representatives. Avon has been able to aggressively grow its representative and distribution network in the US and other mature markets as the high unemployment rate attracts workers to the flexible Avon network. There is a strong correlation with representative growth at Avon and future earnings growth. They also have attractive exposure to the emerging market consumers with approximately three quarters of their profits being generated from emerging economies such as Brazil and Russia. In addition, they have recruited over 1 million representatives in China in just the last three years and Avon has been able to operate unrestricted in that market. They have also been a strong cash flow generator and have an attractive 3.3% dividend yield.
Our “Growth and Income Strategy” targets capital appreciation in addition to yield
Our third strategy identifies core growth and income stocks that may have slightly lower but still attractive current dividend yields plus an outlook for strong and predictable earnings streams that should support additional future dividend increases. We would categorize four of our top ten holdings as industry leaders with strong growth in their categories; Monsanto, ITC Holdings, K&S AG, and Microchip Technology.
Two of our top growth and income holdings are in one of our favorite secular investment themes and that is agriculture where we still see structural imbalances between demand and supply created by emerging market consumers. Monsanto (MON), based in Missouri, is a global producer of agricultural products used by farmers to improve productivity and enhance crop yields. The company has pioneered the development of genetically modified seeds for corn, soy, cotton, fruits and vegetables and is best known for its innovative agricultural technology and rich R&D pipeline. As a global leader in agriculture biotech, Monsanto provides
investors a play on secular trends in favor of increasing farm productivity while curtailing consumption of energy, water, herbicides, and insecticides. We expect strong earnings growth for Monsanto for the next several years. Management raised its dividend by 10% in January 2009 at a time when other companies were cutting and MON now has a 5 year dividend growth rate of over 30% pa (per annum).
K+S AG (SDF GR), based in Germany, is a global supplier of specialty and standard fertilizers, plant care and salt products. The urbanization of emerging markets has increased demand for agricultural products thus stimulating demand for fertilizers like potash, which drives 70% of earnings for K+S. Management is committed to returning cash to shareholders with a current attractive annual dividend yield of 4.9% and a 5 year dividend growth rate of over 50% pa.
ITC Holdings (ITC), based in Michigan, is the largest independent electric transmission company in the US. ITC’s 15,000 circuit miles of transmission lines cover an 80,000 square mile service territory spanning 5 midwestern states. The company is also developing new transmission opportunities in Kansas and Oklahoma, and has recently proposed the 3,000 mile Green Power Express transmission project to bring wind resources from the Dakotas, Minnesota, and Iowa to the midwest. We believe that ITC is very well positioned to participate in the upgrade and build-out of the nation’s electric transmission grid, a key priority for the Obama administration. A more robust grid is needed to tap the nation’s clean energy resources such as wind, solar, and natural gas. ITC is expected to deliver several years of above average EPS growth thanks to favorable regulatory treatment of electric transmission and its ambitious capital spending plans. We view the current share price as attractive for longer-term oriented investors seeking both long term growth and a current 2.8% dividend yield.
Microchip Technology (MCHP), based in Arizona, designs, manufactures and markets microcontrollers for high-volume embedded control applications used in a variety of industries, including appliances, automotive, utility, lighting and medical. The company is the market share leader in its core product category (8 bit microcontrollers) and expanding into adjacent markets (16 bit and 32 bit microcontrollers), which should translate into very attractive annual earnings growth over the long term. In addition, we are attracted to the business’ strong free cash flow generation, which has enabled management to maintain one of the highest dividend yields in the technology sector at 6.1%.
13
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund | |
Outlook for Second Half 2009: We Remain Optimistic as Positive Catalysts Should Support Additional Equity Market Appreciation
Looking to the second half of 2009, we remain encouraged about the outlook for the equity markets and for ADVDX’s investment strategy. This is based on our view that the global economic data should continue to improve, albeit in a potentially choppy manner, from the current depressed levels. Granted, the S&P 500 Index has rebounded by an astounding 40% from the March 2009 lows, so some of the future improvement in economic conditions is likely already priced in to current equity values. So we may be entering a period of consolidation or more muted increases particularly through the low volume summer months, but we continue to see potential opportunities for our investors.
We see several positive catalysts for the global economies and the equity markets in the second fiscal half of 2009. One near term stimulus is the expected rebound in the auto industry. Auto production in the US is estimated to grow by close to 50% from current severely depressed levels through the end of the third quarter 2009. This should drive demand for products across a spectrum of industries, most notably in materials, energy and industrials. For example, in the railroad industry it is estimated that one carload of finished autos creates about seven carloads of inputs that go into autos, like sand for glass, chemicals for plastics, coal for steel and steel finished products to name just a few. In addition, the “cash for clunkers” stimulus program being worked on in Congress will likely be implemented by the fourth quarter of 2009 which should provide incentives for consumers to replace older cars with new, more fuel efficient cars. Similar programs have already been employed in countries like China, Germany, India and Brazil and they have created strong auto demand.
Another short-term catalyst we are currently experiencing is the restocking of depleted global inventories across a variety of sectors. Following the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008 and the ensuing “economic Pearl Harbor” to quote Warren Buffet, companies across the globe faced constraints on short term liquidity that supported inventory growth. In addition, the sharp and sudden decline in economic activity drove companies to rapidly curtail production and work off existing inventory levels. Global industrial production was slashed by record amount from September 2008 through February of 2009. Now that we have seen the stabilization in many of the world economies, companies are beginning to rebuild their slim inventories and global industrial production has started to improve in March 2009.
A longer term catalyst is the impact of the massive fiscal stimulus programs that have been enacted around the world. Countries across the globe are quickly implementing consumer incentive programs and huge government spending programs to promote end user demand and ultimately job growth in their countries. Interestingly, the Obama administration has started to provide weekly reports on the amount of stimulus funds that are being paid out to recipients. This currently stands at $44 billion at the end of May 2009 and is expected to rise to over $250 billion by the end of 2010.
Another longer term catalyst is the large amount of coordinated easing of interest rates by global central banks. This increases money supply and supports economic growth but it traditionally takes 12 to 24 months to see the impact of low short term rates in the economy. But we know that these efforts have helped to stabilize global credit markets and we have started to see an increase in the willingness of banks to make consumer loans, which has a 70% correlation with consumer spending. The result of all these stimulus efforts is that we have started to see a rebound in economic data globally and particularly in many of the emerging market economies.
On the other side of the very powerful catalysts that we have outlined above, there are also identifiable risks that need to be balanced and monitored. One risk to a recovery in the housing market has been the recent rise in the long end of the interest rate curve, which has resulted in an increase in mortgage rates from their very low levels. For example, the Freddie Mac National Mortgage 30 year fixed rate is 5.38% on 6/17/09 which is still at relatively low levels versus the 6.46% at the beginning of fiscal 2009, but it is off the very attractive lows of 4.78% set on 4/30/09. Early in an economic recovery it is traditional for long-term rates to rise as money comes out of treasuries and into higher risk alternatives. Plus, a positive yield curve has been a very strong predictor of future economic recoveries and we are currently seeing one of the steepest yield curves on record.
Another negative for a strong global recovery has been the recent rise in energy prices. Crude began our fiscal year at $102.12 on 11/4/08 and then declined 63.3% to a low of $37.47 on 2/12/09 in response to the abrupt global slowdown. But prices have risen 89.5% from those lows as the outlook for economic recovery has improved and supply has been taken out of the market. Crude now stands above $71 as of 6/18/09 and this rise in input and operating costs acts like a tax on the economy for already constrained businesses and consumers.
Other fundamental drags for a consumer-led recovery include still high levels of unemployment and the
14
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund | |
ongoing de-leveraging cycle. The US posted its highest continuing jobless claims on record on 5/29/09 at 6.83 million people. However, unemployment is typically a lagging indicator and the equity markets traditionally will bottom well before unemployment starts to decline. And we are likely going to continue to see the hangover of households de-levering after binging for years on easy credit lines and home equity withdrawals. The personal savings rate in the US rose to 5.7% in April 2009 which is the highest level since 1995 and will likely be a negative for near term personal consumption. The US government has made tremendous efforts to avert a financial meltdown, but in the end, the key to revitalizing household cash flows and driving sustainable economic growth must be centered on solutions for housing and unemployment.
The Financial Sector Continues to be a Challenging Investment and Dividend Environment
At this time, the financial sector remains a challenge to us not only because the fundamental outlook remains tough, but because they have dramatically reduced or fully eliminated their dividends. Surviving financial leaders such as Citigoup and Fannie Mae have eliminated dividends and companies like Bank of America, JPMorgan and Wells Fargo have slashed their dividends by over 50% and as much as 98% since 2007. These groups of companies were averaging well over 4% dividends yields in 2007 and the global financial sector had traditionally been one of our largest in our dividend capture and U.S. pair trading strategies. Fundamentally, financial companies will likely continue to face write-downs on mortgage-related assets, plus we have the rising risk of defaults on commercial loans and consumer-related credit cards and auto loans. In addition the need to recapitalize balance sheets and the outlook for a reduction in high margin business opportunities may continue to dampen earnings outlooks beyond more write-downs.
Throughout the first half of fiscal 2009, we made what we believe was the correct investment decision to underweight the financial sector stocks because of their rapidly deteriorating fundamentals and the threat of nationalization that took us to the March 2009 market lows. The financials actually surpassed the 83% decline in the technology bust from 2000-2002 by declining 84.6% from the intra-day peak on the S&P 500 Financial Select Sector Index (IXM) on 5/23/07 to the low on 3/6/09. However, thanks to the aggressive policy actions taken by governments around the world, the financials have since rallied a dramatic 86% off their March lows to the close of the fiscal first half on 4/30/09. What is remarkable is that despite this rally, the financial sector
was actually still down 14% for the year to date 2009 through 4/30/09.
Our strategy during the financial markets turmoil has been to add to the higher quality stocks on dips where we believe valuation have become attractive and dividend opportunities exist. So within the financial sector, we have tried to be creative and look for opportunities for investors for our combination of attractive dividends and total returns. For example, we have added some global asset managers which still pay attractive dividends and should benefit from a rebound in asset values, money inflows, and performance fees. We recently bought a basket of Chinese banks with yields averaging over 3% to participate in their economic rebound and we continue to hold the high quality U.S. industry leaders, like JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley. So while we may have put in a floor on the bottom of the financial sector equity prices, now with so many of these companies having dramatically cut or eliminated their dividends it may be difficult for ADVDX to fully participate in further financial rallies.
We Will Maintain Our Balanced Approach In 2009
The volatility over the past 18 months in global equity markets has provided challenges and opportunities. Our goal is to keep our portfolio balanced and maintain our “barbell” approach to our stock selections. What we mean is that a portion of the portfolio will continue to be invested in more defensive companies with what we feel are strong and sustainable earnings and cash flow growth with the potential for increasing dividends. These are companies in sectors like healthcare, consumer staples, telecom, and utilities where earnings and dividend growth should be more resilient in economic downturns. On the other end of the barbell, we are searching for attractive value opportunities in some strong companies in the more cyclical sectors like energy, materials, consumer discretionary and industrials whose prices have been overly punished and where we believe long term growth prospects are still attractive.
While we do expect additional headline risks particularly in the financial sector for the remainder of 2009, we are optimistic that global economic growth should continue to improve in the second half of 2009 and into 2010. In addition, we are hopeful that the second half of 2009 will be a better environment for ADVDX’s investment strategy as fundamental investors focus on high quality and attractive dividend payers. With global interest rates approaching zero, we would expect capital to search for sustainable yield opportunities in equities which was the case coming out of the bear market in the mid-70’s.
15
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund | |
In summary, we see both catalysts and risks in second half 2009. Our approach during these uncertain times is to remain broadly diversified within the dividend-paying universe while actively scanning the globe for undervalued opportunities and high quality cash flow generators. We are confident that we should be able to continue to distribute attractive dividend payouts by capitalizing on our research driven approach to identifying value opportunities as well as through our active management of the portfolio. We are hopeful that we will be able to experience a better equity environment in the second half of 2009 and we will be
able to return ADVDX to its history of strong capital appreciation and total return.
Thank you for your support of ADVDX and we look forward to a better and more prosperous year in 2009 and beyond.
Sincerely,
Jill K. Evans and Kevin Shacknofsky
Co-Portfolio Managers
|
Please refer to the schedule of portfolio investments for fund holding information. Fund holdings and sector allocations are subject to change and should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. |
Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.
Neither the Fund nor any of its representatives may give tax advice. Investors should consult their tax advisor for information concerning their particular situation.
Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in a declining market.
Investing in small and mid cap stocks involves additional risks such as limited liquidity and greater volatility as compared to large cap stocks. Investing in foreign securities tends to involve greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks and differences in accounting methods.
Free cash flow: Cash not required for operations or for reinvestment. Often defined as earnings before interest (often obtained from the operating income line on the income statement) less capital expenditures less the change in working capital.
Earnings Growth is a measure of a company’s net income over a specific period, generally one year, is a key indicator for measuring a company’s success, and the driving force behind stock price appreciation.
Dividend Yield: The yield a company pays out to its shareholders in the form of dividends. It is calculated by taking the amount of dividends paid per share over a specific period of time and dividing by the stock’s price.
The S&P 500 Index is a broad based unmanaged index of 500 stocks, which is widely recognized as representative of the equity market in general.
Lipper Averages are compiled by Lipper, Inc., an independent mutual fund research and rating service. Each Lipper average represents a universe of funds with similar investment objectives.
Lipper rankings are based on total return and do not include the effect of a sales charge. Rankings are only for the classes listed. Rankings of other classes will vary.
The S&P 500 Financial Select Sector Index (IXM) is a modified cap-weighted index that is intended to track the movements of companies that are components of the S&P 500 and are involved in the development or production of financial products. This index serves as the benchmark for the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund XLF.
One cannot invest directly in an index.
16
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Financial Services Fund
NASDAQ 100 Financial Index
PHLX/KBW Bank Index
S&P 500 Index
$8,056
$7,818
$6,038
$3,787
$15,000
$13,000
$11,000
$9,000
$7,000
$5,000
$3,000
Nov 1
05
Jan 31
06
Apr 30
06
Jul 31
06
Oct 31
06
Jan 31
07
Apr 30
07
Jul 31
07
Oct 31
07
Jan 31
08
Apr 30
08
Jul 31
08
Oct 31
08
Jan 31
09
Apr 30
09
Value of a $10,000 Investment
Performance data quoted represents past performance and is not predictive of future results. Investment return and principal value of the Fund fluctuate, so that the shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance current to the most recent month end may be lower or higher than performance quoted and may be obtained by calling 1-888-785-5578. Performance data shown does not reflect the 1.00% redemption fee imposed on shares held for fewer than 2 months. If it did, total returns would be reduced.
The NASDAQ 100 Financial Index is a capitalization-weighted index of the 100 largest financial companies, as well as foreign issues, including American Depository Receipts (ADRs), traded on the NASDAQ National Market System (NASDAQ/NMS) and SmallCap Market. The PHLX/KBW Bank Index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed and National Market System stocks, representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. The S&P 500 Index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. The Lipper Financial Services Funds Average is an average of funds whose primary objective is to invest primarily in equity securities of companies engaged in providing financial services. Lipper Rankings for the periods shown are based on Fund total returns with dividends and distributions reinvested and do not reflect sales charges. The NASDAQ 100 Financial Index, the PHLX/KBW Bank Index, the S&P 500 Index and the Lipper Financial Services Funds Average are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment adviser fees. The performance for the Dynamic Financial Services Fund reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot directly invest in an index.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Comparative Annualized Returns as of 4/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| 6 Months (1) |
| 1 Year |
| 3 Years |
| Since Inception |
| ||||
Alpine Dynamic Financial Services Fund |
| -7.34 | % |
| -38.56 | % |
| -11.15 | % |
| -6.00 | % |
|
NASDAQ 100 Financial Index |
| -22.25 | % |
| -35.08 | % |
| -17.12 | % |
| -13.45 | % |
|
PHLX/KBW Bank Index |
| -42.83 | % |
| -58.60 | % |
| -31.14 | % |
| -24.27 | % |
|
S&P 500 Index |
| -8.53 | % |
| -35.31 | % |
| -10.76 | % |
| -6.80 | % |
|
Lipper Financial Services Funds Average |
| -21.43 | % |
| -45.76 | % |
| -23.23 | % |
| -8.29 | % |
|
Lipper Financial Services Fund Ranking |
| — |
|
| 28/86 |
|
| 8/66 |
|
| 15/62 |
|
|
|
|
(1) | Not annualized. FINRA does not recognize rankings for less than one year. |
17
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Financial Services Fund | |
|
|
Portfolio Distributions* (Unaudited) | Top 10 Holdings* (Unaudited) |
Insurance 3.9%
IT Services 5.2%
Investment Companies 2.2%
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance 10.3%
Transportation Infrastructure 0.8%
Capital Markets 28.2%
Cash & Cash Equivalents 1.5%
Commercial Banks 25.0%
Commercial Services & Supplies 0.4%
Diversified Financial Services 20.9%
Industrial Conglomerates 1.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
| IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. |
| 6.67% |
|
2. |
|
| Alliance Bancorp, Inc. |
| 5.33% |
|
3. |
|
| Banco do Estado do Rio Grande |
| 4.32% |
|
4. |
|
| JMP Group, Inc. |
| 3.95% |
|
5. |
|
| Goldleaf Financial Solutions, Inc. |
| 3.55% |
|
6. |
|
| Blackstone Group LP |
| 3.45% |
|
7. |
|
| The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
| 3.40% |
|
8. |
|
| Sanders Morris Harris Group, Inc. |
| 3.07% |
|
9. |
|
| MF Global, Ltd. |
| 2.70% |
|
10. |
|
| CME Group, Inc. |
| 2.60% |
|
|
|
|
| ||
* | Portfolio holdings and sector distributions are as of 4/30/09 and are subject to change. Portfolio holdings are not recommendations to buy or sell any securities. Top 10 Holdings do not include short-term investments. Portfolio Distributions percentages are based on total investments and Top 10 Holdings percentages are based on total net assets. |
|
Commentary |
|
Dear Investor: |
The Alpine Dynamic Financial Services Fund reported a -7.34% total return during the six months ended April 30, 2009. This compares favorably to returns for the NASDAQ 100 Financial Index of -22.25% and the PHLX/KBW Bank Index of -42.83% during the same period.
The fiscal year started off with the financial industry entering the worst storm since the Great Depression. Conditions were dark and bleak. The failure of Lehman Brothers and the Government takeover of AIG caused the capital markets to seize-up. Only through a concerted worldwide effort among Governments and their central bankers was the flow of much needed liquidity sustained. Consumer sentiment and public trust of the banking industry was at its lowest point. As we progressed through the first half of the fiscal year, business conditions remained challenging. The holiday season proved to be a disappointment, the labor market weakened further, the only source of capital for banks was the Government, the bailout of the auto industry was not going well, the credibility of the new US Treasury Secretary was in question, and politicians attracted media attention by talking openly about the potential need to nationalize some large banks. But a glimmer of hope began to appear as we neared the end of this period. The market, as measured by the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, rallied off a March 9 closing low on
news of an internal letter from Citigroup’s CEO stating the company was having the best quarter since late summer 2007. This was followed by comments from the CEO of Bank of America stating that the bank was profitable in the first two months of the year and he expected a profit for the full year. The rally brought a change in investor sentiment. Instead of seeing the “economic glass” as half empty, investors started to focus on any positive trend in the data being reported. Then in early May, an overhanging uncertainty for the large banks was taken away with the reported results of the Government’s stress test. This disclosure opened the door to the capital markets for banks wanting to raise capital and repay government TARP money. Tens of billions of dollars have been raised by banks and insurance companies since early May. This flow of private capital into the sector along with an improved credit market has eliminated the fear of bank nationalization and greatly reduced the negative rhetoric coming out of Washington. This in turn has given a boost to financial stocks.
Although market conditions for financial stocks have improved since the beginning of the fiscal year, business conditions still remain challenging. Two areas of investor concern are capital and asset quality. As we just discussed, financial institutions are addressing their capital needs but asset quality is tied to the credit cycle which moves in a slow methodical manner. Our
18
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Financial Services Fund | |
discussions with bank managements lead us to conclude that nonperforming assets and charge-offs will likely remain at elevated levels into 2010. These conditions will negatively affect net interest margins, loan loss provisions, and other noninterest expenses. We expect little to no balance sheet growth this year. Part is due to the banks’ desire to let problem assets run-off and to build their capital ratios and part is due to a reduction in loan demand. Contrary to press reports, banks are looking to lend to good borrowers. What has changed is the lax loan underwriting of the boom times has been replaced with more traditional conservative underwriting. Debt coverage, loan to value ratios and projections appear more realistic. With the aggressive Wall Street conduits gone, loans now appear to be priced to their appropriate risk level. In the long run this should help the net interest margin. Mortgage banking operations did well in the first quarter of calendar 2009 due to a strong level of refinancing but with the recent back-up in interest rates this trend has reversed in the second quarter. During this difficult operating environment, companies are focused on cost control. A number of financial companies have announced headcount reduction programs. Discretionary capital expenditures are also being scrutinized. Partially offsetting these cost savings are expected increases in FDIC deposit insurance premiums and the cost of working through problem assets.
In an effort to preserve capital, many financial institutions have cut their cash dividends and cancelled their stock buyback programs. We expect these initiatives will remain in place until the level of problem assets begins to decline. We also expect the pace of healthy bank mergers to remain slow until asset quality trends improve. In the interim, we believe industry consolidation will center on FDIC assisted failed bank transactions. We also believe there could be some merger of equal transactions among small community banks as a means of reaching scale to be profitable and increasing their legal lending limit to one borrower.
Based on our outlook for the financial industry, we still prefer companies with little or no credit exposure. At the top of our list are the futures exchanges, CME Group and Intercontinental Exchange. We feel these exchanges should benefit from the U.S. Treasury’s desire to increase transparency of the derivatives market, which includes interest rate and credit default swaps, by moving more of these transactions from the private over-the-counter market to an open centralized electronic platform like the exchanges. We also like the
emerging markets exchanges, such as, BM&F Bovespa in Brazil, Bolsa Mexicana, and the Hong Kong Exchange. We believe some of the better hedge fund managers, who closed down their funds due to adverse market conditions and are taking the summer off, may look at raising money later this year. If these high transaction investors re-emerge it should increase the trading volume on the equity exchanges like NASDAQ OMX Group and NYSE Euronext.
Another area we like are companies that provide trading services. These firms do not have exposure to the more volatile investment banking operations. Instead they depend on the trading volume of their customers. If the current stock market continues to trend upward we would anticipate that the retail investors may return and trade more frequently. Companies that would potentially benefit from this trend are Interactive Brokers Group, OptionsXpress Holdings, and TradeStation.
Although we remain cautious on the banking sector, we believe the small community bank stocks currently offer the best potential long-term return. These stocks have not increased as dramatically as the large-cap bank stocks have in the last three months. We suppose that much of the buying in bank stocks during this period was by large mutual funds looking for very liquid stocks to deploy their cash quickly. As for micro-cap bank stocks, the investor base tends to be dedicated financial services funds along with individual investors. We would expect when money flows back into these specialty funds that part of that money could be invested in community bank stocks. One such bank that we like is California United Bank. The Bank was founded in May 2005 in the town of Encino. It is one of the most successful start-up banks. In less than four years the Bank has grown to $412 million in assets with three branches and one loan production office. As of the writing of this letter, the Bank has yet to report their first nonperforming loan. Part of the Bank’s success is due to the fact that the senior management team had worked together at another local bank, which they sold near the top of the bank stock market in 1999. Management has successfully reassembled some of their best bankers and attracted many of their clients from the previous institution.
During this uncertain economic time we attempt to reduce the overall risk of the portfolio without jeopardizing potential return. This is done by constructing a diversified portfolio which includes stocks
19
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Financial Services Fund | |
we believe should outperform near term, like the exchange stocks, along with stocks we believe may provide stability near term but potentially outperform long term, like California United. We wish to thank our investors for your continued support in our endeavor.
Sincerely,
Peter J. Kovalski
Portfolio Manager
|
|
| |
The fund primarily invests in equity securities of financial services companies and will be affected by risk factors particular to this industry such as regulation, monetary and fiscal policies and interest rates, as well as general market risks. The fund invests in smaller companies, which involve additional risks such as liquidity and greater volatility. The fund invests in foreign securities which involve greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks and differences in accounting methods. |
There is no assurance the fund will achieve its investment objective.
References to other mutual funds should not be interpreted as an offer of those securities.
Please refer to the schedule of portfolio investments for fund holding information. Fund holdings and/or sector allocations are subject to change at any time and are not recommendations to buy or sell any security. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.
Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in a declining market.
20
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
$3,000
$5,000
$9,000
$7,000
$11,000
$13,000
$15,000
Alpine Dynamic Innovators Fund
Russell 2000 Total Return Growth Index
$7,478
$6,017
Value of a $10,000 Investment
Jul 11
06
Aug 31
06
Oct 31
06
Dec 31
06
Feb 28
07
Apr 30
07
Jun 30
07
Aug 31
07
Oct 31
07
Dec 31
07
Feb 29
08
Apr 30
08
Jun 30
08
Aug 31
08
Oct 31
08
Dec 31
08
Feb 28
09
Apr 30
09
This chart represents a comparison of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark. The graph and the table do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Investment performance reflects the waiver and recovery of certain fees. Without the waiver and recovery of fees, the Fund’s total return would have differed.
Performance data quoted represents past performance and is not predictive of future results. Investment return and principal value of the Fund fluctuate, so that the shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance current to the most recent month end may be lower or higher than performance quoted and may be obtained by calling 1-888-785-5578. Performance data shown does not reflect the 1.00% redemption fee imposed on shares held for fewer than 2 months. If it did, total returns would be reduced.
The S&P 500 Index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. The S&P 500 Index is unmanaged and does not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment advisory fees.
The Russell 2000 Total Return Growth Index is constructed to provide a comprehensive and unbiased barometer of the small-cap growth market. Based on ongoing empirical research of investment manager behavior, the methodology used to determine growth probability approximates the aggregate small-cap growth manager’s opportunity set. The Lipper Small-Cap Growth Funds Average is an average of Funds that, by portfolio practice, invest at least 75% of their equity assets in companies with market capitalizations (on a three year weighted basis) less than 250% of the dollar-weighted median of the smallest 500 of the middle 1,000 securities of the S&P SuperComposite 1500 Index. Lipper Rankings for the periods shown are based on Fund total returns with dividends and distributions reinvested and do not reflect sales charges. The Russell 2000 Total Return Growth Index and the Lipper Small-Cap Growth Funds Average are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment adviser fees. The performance for the Dynamic Innovators Fund reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot directly invest in an index.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Comparative Annualized Returns as of 4/30/09 | ||||||||||
|
| 6 Months (1) |
| 1 Year |
| Since Inception |
| |||
Alpine Dynamic Innovators Fund |
| -16.40 | % |
| -53.61 | % |
| -16.58 | % |
|
Russell 2000 Total Return Growth Index |
| -3.77 | % |
| -30.36 | % |
| -9.85 | % |
|
Lipper Small-Cap Growth Funds Average |
| -3.25 | % |
| - 33.04 | % |
| -10.31 | % |
|
Lipper Small-Cap Growth Fund Ranking |
| — |
|
| 587/587 |
|
| 477/509 |
|
|
(1) Not annualized. FINRA does not recognize rankings for less than one year.
21
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Innovators Fund | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Distributions* (Unaudited) |
| Top 10 Holdings* (Unaudited) | |||||
Information Technology 28.4% Materials 5.5% Consumer Discretionary 9.3% Energy 0.6% Financials 3.5% Health Care 35.9% Industrials 16.8% |
| 1. |
| Itron, Inc. |
| 6.93 | % |
2. |
| FLIR Systems, Inc. |
| 5.40 | % | ||
3. |
| Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. |
| 5.35 | % | ||
4. |
| Ansys, Inc. |
| 5.25 | % | ||
5. |
| Logitech International SA |
| 5.10 | % | ||
6. |
| Intuitive Surgical, Inc. |
| 4.67 | % | ||
7. |
| Priceline.com, Inc. |
| 4.50 | % | ||
8. |
| Life Time Fitness, Inc. |
| 4.35 | % | ||
9. |
| Life Technologies Corp. |
| 4.32 | % | ||
10. |
| Alcon, Inc. |
| 4.27 | % | ||
* Portfolio holdings and sector distributions are as of 4/30/09 and are subject to change. Portfolio holdings are not recommendations to buy or sell any securities. Top 10 Holdings do not include short-term investments. Portfolio Distributions percentages are based on total investments and Top 10 Holdings percentages are based on total net assets. |
|
Commentary |
Dear Investor:
The Alpine Dynamic Innovators Fund experienced a total return decline of-16.40% in the first half of our fiscal year, ended April 30, 2009. This compares with the decline of -8.53% for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Averages and -9.37% for the Dow Jones Industrial Averages. These six months were generally an adverse period for equity values and proved especially negative for the shares of smaller capitalization companies with generally volatile earnings. The Dynamic Innovators Fund concentrates significantly in such companies. The long-term record demonstrates that this is an area that has historically provided attractive returns on investment. But, in the adverse environment of the six months period from November 1, 2008 to April 30, 2009 stock issues in this category proved to be unappreciated and even unwanted. A significant reversal of these adverse trends began subsequent to March 6th and continued through May and to this writing in early June.
The role of innovative, usually smaller companies in the economy and the markets presented challenging contradictions in the period under review. Innovation was often faced with a deteriorating demand situation, and consequent losses in production and productivity as the economy slipped into acute recession. Ironically, many such companies are potentially the vehicles which would help to reaccelerate the economy in emerging from recession. Their innovations should be capable of providing new stimulus in demand and profit generation. In the recent nervous market environment, such holdings were often regarded by investors as marginal
commitments rather than high potential opportunities. They were frequently eliminated from portfolios as the economic crisis atmosphere surged. We made many sales of issues considered vulnerable to further declines.
We made purchases of issues which seemed to us to be strikingly undervalued in terms of their innovative growth potentials. We were encouraged to take positive action by the historical record of major sharp market declines in recessionary periods, where smaller-capitalization, less well-known companies shares were often simply abandoned and then became profits leaders in the subsequent recovery. We hope to see similar trends as recovery develops.
A few investments led the portfolio with significant gains even in this adverse market environment. The top ten produced gains ranging from +14.5% to +91.1% in the six month period. They are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Allscripts-Mysis Healthcare Solutions |
|
| +91.1 | % |
Priceline Co. |
|
| +84.5 | % |
Life Technologies |
|
| +29.6 | % |
Hologic Inc. |
|
| +21.5 | % |
HMS Holdings Corp. |
|
| +21.0 | % |
Mocon Inc. |
|
| +20.5 | % |
Flowserve Corp. |
|
| +20.5 | % |
Inventive Health Inc. |
|
| +17.1 | % |
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. |
|
| +15.3 | % |
Westport Innovations, Inc. |
|
| +14.5 | % |
Significantly, half of these leading issues are participants in the healthcare industry, and a leader in a phase of the technologies which should be significantly benefited by the focus of the Obama Administration’s stimulus program.
22
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Innovators Fund | |
Ironically, the bottom ten performers, which fell from - -27.8% to
-79.9%, also include healthcare innovators. But, those which were most severely affected, Sequenom Inc., Arthrocare Corp. and Abiomed Corp., each disclosed disappointing trends with their major innovative products. Sequenom, which had been the Fund’s outstanding performer in a move from original purchase at $7.77 in October, 2006 fell from a high of $29.00 in September, 2008 to just over $3.00 when it was disclosed that their most innovative product was marred with questioned data.
Following the trends which had begun after March 6, and anticipating more stabilized markets, we believe the Fund is well positioned. Our confidence is high that the fundamentals of innovative businesses in the United States remain promising. With venture capital funding
declining and leveraged buyouts minimal, we expect more attention to be paid to established businesses with high growth potential through their innovative products or services. Our goal is to increase the Fund’s participation in such companies and continue to take advantage of emerging new opportunities.
We thank our shareholders for their confidence in this thesis and our management in the difficult period just passed.
Sincerely,
Stephen A. Lieber
Samuel A. Lieber
Co-Portfolio Managers
|
Please refer to the schedule of portfolio investments for fund holding information. Fund holdings and sector allocations are subject to change and should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.
The Fund may invest in smaller and medium size companies, which involve additional risks such as limited liquidity and greater volatility. The Fund may also invest in micro-cap company stocks which are more volatile than those of larger companies and tend to perform poorly during times of economic stress. The Fund may invest in foreign securities which involve greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks and differences in accounting methods. The Fund may invest in debt securities which typically decrease in value when interest rates rise. This risk is usually greater for longer-term debt securities. The Fund portfolio will involve short positions, which involves unlimited risk including the possibility that losses may exceed the original amount invested. The fund may also use options and future contracts, which have risks associated with unlimited losses of the underlying holdings due to unanticipated market movements and failure to correctly predict the direction of securities prices, interest rates and currency exchange rates. However, a mutual fund investor’s risk is limited to one’s amount of investment in a mutual fund.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is an unmanaged index of common stocks comprised of major industrial companies and assumes reinvestment of dividends. The S&P 500 Index is a broad based unmanaged index of 500 stocks, which is widely recognized as representative of the equity market in general. You cannot invest directly in an index.
23
|
|
Value of a $10,000 Investment
$11,000
$10,000
$9,000
$8,000
$7,000
$6,000
$5,000
$4,000
Dec 31
07
Feb 29
08
Apr 30
08
Jun 30
08
Aug 31
08
Oct 31
08
Dec 31
08
Feb 28
09
Apr 30
09
$6,143
$5,883
Alpine Dynamic Transformations Fund
S&P 500 Index
This chart represents a comparison of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark. The graph and the table do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Investment performance reflects the waiver and recovery of certain fees. Without the waiver and recovery of fees, the Fund’s total return would have differed.
Performance data quoted represents past performance and is not predictive of future results. Investment return and principal value of the Fund fluctuate, so that the shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance current to the most recent month end may be lower or higher than performance quoted and may be obtained by calling 1-888-785-5578. Performance data shown does not reflect the 1.00% redemption fee imposed on shares held for fewer than 2 months. If it did, total returns would be reduced.
The S&P 500 Index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. The Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds Average is an average of funds that invest at least 75% of their equity assets in companies with market capitalizations below Lipper’s USDE large cap floor. Lipper Rankings for the periods shown are based on Fund total returns with dividends and distributions reinvested and do not reflect sales charges. The S&P 500 Index and the Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds Average are unmanaged and do not reflect fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment adviser fees. The performance for the Dynamic Transformations Fund reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot directly invest in an index.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Comparative Annualized Returns as of 4/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 Months (1) |
| 1 Year |
| Since Inception |
| |||
Alpine Dynamic Transformations Fund |
| 1.60 | % |
| -41.70 | % |
| -32.87 | % |
|
S&P 500 Index |
| -8.53 | % |
| -35.31 | % |
| -30.65 | % |
|
Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds Average |
| -1.87 | % |
| -33.98 | % |
| -29.07 | % |
|
Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds Ranking |
| — |
|
| 344/380 |
|
| 293/375 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Not annualized. FINRA does not recognize rankings for less than one year. |
24
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Transformations Fund | |
|
|
Portfolio Distributions* (Unaudited) | Top 10 Holdings* (Unaudited) |
|
|
Information Technology 10.6%
Materials 6.6%
Cash & Cash Equivalents 5.6%
Consumer Discretionary 30.6%
Financials 8.0%
Health Care 12.6%
Industrials 26.0%
|
|
|
|
1. | Pall Corp. | 10.00% |
|
2. | Ingersoll-Rand Co., Ltd. | 6.02% |
|
3. | Autoliv, Inc. | 5.60% |
|
4. | Priceline.com, Inc. | 5.51% |
|
5. | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | 5.44% |
|
6. | Starbucks Corp. | 4.38% |
|
7. | CME Group, Inc. | 4.19% |
|
8. | FLIR Systems, Inc. | 4.15% |
|
9. | Hewlett-Packard Co. | 4.09% |
|
10. | Emergency Medical Services Corp. | 3.96% |
|
|
|
* | Portfolio holdings and sector distributions are as of 4/30/09 and are subject to change. |
|
Commentary |
Dear Investor:
The Alpine Dynamic Transformations Fund investment performance in the first half of its fiscal year, the six months ended April 30, 2009 produced a total return of 1.60%. This contrasted with declines of -8.53% for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and -9.37% for the Dow Jones Industrial Average. It is encouraging to note that as of this writing, June 11, 2009, it appears that the Fund has emerged from an extremely challenging economic and market environment. Please refer to the preceding page for our standardized performance.
Notwithstanding highly adverse conditions for equities, a number of portfolio holdings which are transformative in nature outperformed the market’s environment in the period under review. Illustrative are the top five performers during this period, as follows:
Ingersoll-Rand Corp. shares advanced 20.6% in the period ended April 30. This classically old line, heavy industry company, has been in the process of significant refocus of its products and even its base of operations. The company sold their small tractor operations and purchased a major producer of ventilation and cooling systems, Trane Company. It also moved its base of operations to Bermuda, providing international tax advantages.
During the six month period of this report, Autoliv Inc. gained 18.9%. This leading producer of automotive safety equipment, seat belts and airbags, has begun an important transformation into night vision driving
systems. Recently it has contracted with Texas Instruments Corp. for processors for night vision systems. Pressed by the adversities in the automotive industry which it serves, it appears to be leading in the recovery with its new product potentials.
Exide Technologies shares were up 14.3% for the same period. It seeks to move its dependence on the traditional automotive battery to a position in the hybrid battery powered field.
Ryland Group shares were up 10.6% in the six months period. This important home builder has reshaped its operations through reducing dependence on land inventory, writing down assets and converting them into cash.
Starbucks Corp. shares were up 10.1%. Starbucks is aiming to revitalize its position as a major coffee shop operator with new blends, new marketing policies and closure of underperforming units.
While the transformation oriented companies led through the entire six month period, there are others which were purchased during the period and produced strong results. Notably, PNC Financial shares rose 77.0% from purchase on February 20, 2009, CME Group was up 26.6% from purchase on January 21, 2009, and Snap-On Tools Inc. was up 20.6% from March 25, 2009. Each was regarded as a transformative opportunity. PNC had acquired a key Ohio banking franchise, CME Group (a derivatives exchange) that appeared likely to benefit from new regulation and trading opportunities of credit
25
|
|
Alpine Dynamic Transformations Fund | |
default swaps, and Snap-On Inc. is broadening its product base beyond its traditional dependence upon automotive maintenance and repair.
The bottom five performers during the six month period were companies which had slow downs in their transformative growth during this period. The most adverse was Flotek Industries Inc., down 89.0% as its oil and gas related exploration products saw a sharp fall off in demand with the declining prices of oil and gas. Most recently the company has received a significant capital infusion. Abiomed, Inc. shares were down 55.0% as their new heart assistance devices did not reach expected sales levels prior to new clinical trials. Walter Energy was down 25.5% reflecting declining coal demand for export. Wells Fargo shares were originally purchased as Wachovia stock. Under severe pressure at the height of the banking crisis, the shares fell 39.4% during this period. Priceline.com Inc. shares were down 39.3% in the six month period, but have since recovered by more than 20% to within 5% of our original March 2008 purchase price.
Considerable portfolio restructuring took place during the six month period. Most notable was the reduction of a significant segment of investments from the oil and gas development industries. These resulted in losses being recorded for holdings such as Helix Energy
Solutions Group, Plains Exploration and Production Co., Tidewater Inc., and Chesapeake Energy Corp. Among financials, the most significant loss was in the shares of Federal National Mortgage Association, which was sold in recognition of the change in their status, dictated by the U.S. Treasury, into the ambiguous state of “conservatorship”. Efforts were made to offset these significant losses in the financials with new commitments and profit taking in the shares of State Street Corp., PNC Financial and Direxion Financial ETFs.
We believe that this still early stage Fund has gone through a challenging initial period which has already demonstrated that the focus on companies with significant transformation which are well managed and well positioned have the potential to prove highly rewarding. The results thus far in 2009 encourage us in this belief. We believe that as the economy emerges from a recession it should be increasingly apparent that corporate transformations may be a leading source of capital appreciation.
Sincerely,
Stephen A. Lieber
Sarah Hunt
Co-Portfolio Managers
|
The Fund may invest in smaller and medium size companies, which involve additional risks such as limited liquidity and greater volatility. The Fund may also invest in micro-cap company stocks which are more volatile than those of larger companies and tend to perform poorly during times of economic stress. The Fund may invest in foreign securities which involve greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks and differences in accounting methods. The Fund may invest in debt securities which typically decrease in value when interest rates rise. This risk is usually greater for longer-term debt securities. |
|
Please refer to the schedule of portfolio investments for fund holding information. Fund holdings and sector allocations are subject to change and should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk. |
|
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is an unmanaged index of common stocks comprised of major industrial companies and assumes reinvestment of dividends. You cannot invest directly in an index. |
26
|
|
Value of a $10,000 Investment
Alpine Accelerating Dividend Fund
S&P 500 Index
Dow Jones Industrial Average
$11,000
$10,000
$9,000
$8,000
$7,000
Nov 05
08
Nov 30
08
Dec 31
08
Jan 31
09
Feb 28
09
Mar 31
09
Apr 30
09
$9,860
$9,295
$9,095
This chart represents a comparison of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark. The graph and the table do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Investment performance reflects the waiver and recovery of certain fees. Without the waiver and recovery of fees, the Fund’s total return would have differed.
Performance data quoted represents past performance and is not predictive of future results. Investment return and principal value of the Fund fluctuate, so that the shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance current to the most recent month end may be lower or higher than performance quoted and may be obtained by calling 1-888-785-5578. Performance data shown does not reflect the 1.00% redemption fee imposed on shares held for fewer than 2 months. If it did, total returns would be reduced.
The S&P 500 Index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a price weighted average of 30 actively traded shares of large cap U.S. industrial corporations. The S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones Industrial Average are unmanaged and do not reflect fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment adviser fees. The performance for the Accelerating Dividend Fund reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot directly invest in an index.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Comparative Annualized Returns as of 4/30/09 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| 1 Month (1) |
| 3 Months (1) |
| Since Inception |
| ||||||||||||
Alpine Accelerating Dividend Fund |
| 3.46 | % |
| -2.18 | % |
| -1.40 | % |
| |||||||||
S&P 500 Index |
| 9.57 | % |
| 6.48 | % |
| -7.05 | % |
| |||||||||
Dow Jones Industrial Average |
| 7.56 | % |
| 3.05 | % |
| -9.05 | % |
| |||||||||
(1) Not annualized. FINRA does not recognize rankings for less than one year.
27
|
|
Alpine Accelerating Dividend Fund | |
Portfolio Distributions* (Unaudited)
Industrials 13.9%
Information Technology 5.2%
Materials 8.2%
Telecommunication Services 2.0%
Utilities 8.3%
Cash & Cash Equivalents 24.4%
Consumer Discretionary 4.6%
Consumer Staples 16.3%
Energy 4.3%
Financials 3.0%
Health Care 9.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
| Sigma-Aldrich Corp. |
| 3.50% |
|
2. |
| Chevron Corp. |
| 3.29% |
|
3. |
| Colgate-Palmolive Co. |
| 3.23% |
|
4. |
| Alcon, Inc. |
| 3.21% |
|
5. |
| General Mills, Inc. |
| 3.16% |
|
6. |
| Chubb Corp. |
| 3.11% |
|
7. |
| General Dynamics Corp. |
| 3.09% |
|
8. |
| Sonoco Products Co. |
| 3.04% |
|
9. |
| L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. |
| 3.04% |
|
10. |
| Wisconsin Energy Corp. |
| 2.99% |
|
|
|
* | Portfolio holdings and sector distributions are as of 4/30/09 and are subject to change. Portfolio holdings are not recommendations to buy or sell any securities. Top 10 Holdings do not include short-term investments. Portfolio Distributions percentages are based on total investments and Top 10 Holdings percentages are based on total net assets. |
|
Commentary |
Dear Investor:
On November 5, 2008 we launched the Alpine Accelerating Dividend Fund. In its first 6 months of operation, ending on April 30, 2009, the Fund experienced a total decline of 1.40%. This compares favorably with the decline of 7.05% for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and a decline of 11.26% for the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the same period.
The objective of the Accelerating Dividend Fund is to invest in companies with a history of rising dividends where the dividend increase is currently accelerating on an annual basis, or has the potential to accelerate in the future based on our analysis. The aim of the Alpine Accelerating Dividend Fund is to achieve a strong stream of income flow and capital appreciation by concentrating investment in companies which have not only had a history of increasing their dividends but have done so at an accelerating rate. Meeting this standard is a test of financial quality and capability. We believe acceleration is best sustained by companies with consistent sales or service growth, with liquid and growing financial assets. Our aim is to generate income for our investors by selecting what we believe are high quality companies with very solid financial profiles.
Illustrative of companies that have been capable of meeting the standards of our accelerating dividend program are the top performing holdings in the brief history of this still incubating Fund. The following are the top performers from the funds inception through the period ending April 30, 2009: J&J Snack Foods +32%, Monsanto +26%, McGrath Rentcorp +19%, Sigma Aldrich +15% and L-3 Communications +10%. Significantly, these companies are not concentrated in
any one particular area, but conversely represent a broad cross-section of numerous industries including consumer products, agricultural, bio-chemicals, modular office rental, and defense. It is our intention to continue to look for investments that meet our criteria without assuming excessive risk by overly concentrating in one particular sector.
While a limited universe of companies have provided increasing dividends for a sustained period of time, even fewer have demonstrated sustained dividend acceleration. We use a selective screening process to identify companies with this potential. We feel that in the long-run, these companies should provide better risk-adjusted returns for investors while simultaneously providing a buffer against dramatic declines in the stock market and excessive volatility. It is important to recognize that these companies may not outperform the broader market in all environments. For example, when markets rebound off their troughs, more speculative, higher-beta stocks tend to outperform as companies with riskier financial profiles that possessed a higher probability of financial distress recover off their dramatically low valuations. However, when viewed over a longer investment horizon and through a full economic cycle, we feel that companies with more conservative balance sheets and credit profiles should ultimately outperform, especially on a risk-adjusted basis.
Growing, or even sustaining, dividends in the current environment is extremely difficult, as evidenced by a record number of dividend cuts experienced from companies across various sectors. Even dividend stalwarts such as General Electric, Pfizer and US
28
|
|
Alpine Accelerating Dividend Fund | |
Bancorp, who have a long and proud history of dividend increases were forced to cut their dividends significantly earlier this year. The challenge of sustaining the dividend is further exemplified by BB&T, a large US regional bank headquartered in North Carolina. Having previously increased its dividend 37 consecutive years, this former member of the S&P Dividend Aristocrats was forced to cut their dividend by almost 70% earlier this year. Kelly King, Chairman and CEO of BB&T, said that the decision to cut the dividend marked “the worst day in my 37-year career.”
By deploying a three-pronged approach, we aim to be selective in identifying companies that we feel are best positioned to maintain their historical dividend trajectories. First, we look for companies that internally generate enough free cash flow from their core operations to support their dividends and fund share repurchases. Second, we monitor the ratio of cash flow to adjusted net income to indentify companies whose core earnings (adjusted for depreciation and amortization) are running in-line with the amount of cash flow from operations. Third, we favor companies with stronger liquidity and debt-servicing capabilities. We believe that companies with more unencumbered balance sheets retain flexibility in recessions which enables them to avoid franchise-destroying actions that other companies are forced to pursue to maintain their debt loads. On the contrary, these companies are better positioned to take advantage of market opportunities and enhance their franchise at the expense of competitors by acquiring assets at the bottom, rather than the top, of the cycle.
Despite the recent rebound in the equity markets and evidence of macro-economic “green-shoots,” we remain
cautious on the economy and prospects for a sustained and rapid recovery. The leverage in our system has only modestly declined since the start of the credit crisis and remains very elevated relative to historical standards across a number of measures, including consumer debt / disposable income, consumer debt / gross domestic product (GDP) and financial-system debt / GDP. Furthermore, unemployment continues to increase at a rapid pace with little evidence of abating given persistently high initial unemployment claims above the 600,000 threshold. Lastly, higher regulatory capital requirements for financial institutions, and new accounting regulations that will disallow gain-on-sale accounting and virtually eliminate off-balance sheet securitizations, will materially restrict consumer credit availability going forward. These forces, coupled with an increasing consumer savings rate, will remain a headwind to a potential recovery in the near-term. Given the logic of a cautious macro-economic stance, we remain optimistic that companies which meet the high standards of dividend growth and strong liquidity, basic to this strategy, should withstand potential additional down-side shocks and a protracted difficult recovery phase.
We firmly believe that our strategy should provide investors with above average risk-adjusted returns through the cycle, and thank our shareholders for their confidence in our management during these unprecedented and highly volatile market conditions.
Sincerely,
Stephen A. Lieber
David Burg
Co-Portfolio Managers
Please refer to the schedule of portfolio investments for fund holding information. Fund holdings and/or sector allocations are subject to change at any time and are not recommendations to buy or sell any security. Current and future holdings are subject to risk.
Investing in small and mid cap stocks involves additional risks such as limited liquidity and greater volatility as compared to large cap stocks. Investing in foreign securities tends to involve greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks and differences in accounting methods.
The S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (index) consists of the members of the S&P 500 Index which have consistently increased their dividend for the past 25 years. The index is weighted equally and rebalanced every December (or if a member company is removed from the S&P 500 during the calendar year). One cannot invest in an index.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is an unmanaged index of common stocks comprised of major industrial companies and assumes reinvestment of dividends. The S&P 500 Index is a broad based unmanaged index of 500 stocks, which is widely recognized as representative of the equity market in general. You cannot invest directly in an index.
The S&P 500 Index is a broad based unmanaged index of 500 stocks, which is widely recognized as representative of the equity market in general.
Free cash flow: Cash not required for operations or for reinvestment. Often defined as earnings before interest (often obtained from the operating income line on the income statement) less capital expenditures less the change in working capital. Beta measures the volatility of the fund, as compared to that of the overall market. The Market’s beta is set at 1.00; a beta higher than 1.00 is considered to be more volatile than the market, while a beta lower than 1.00 is considered to be less volatile.
29
|
|
| Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund |
|
|
| Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund |
30
|
|
Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund vs. Peer Performance (Unaudited)
3.80
3.60
3.40
3.20
3.00
2.80
2.60
2.40
2.20
2.00
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
0.00
1.10%
0.45%
1.19%
0.77%
0.56%
2.44%
2.18%
1.72%
3.39%
3.14%
2.76%
3.65%
3.14%
3.00%
2.36%
1.57%
0.34%
0.09%
Calendar Year
2003
Calendar Year
2004*
Calendar Year
2005
Calendar Year
2006
Calendar Year
2007**
Calendar Year
2008
2009 thru
4/30/09
PERIOD
Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund – Investor Class
Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund – Adviser Class
Lipper Tax-Exempt Money Market Funds Average
|
|
* | The Adviser Class return for 2004 is from 3/30/04 (inception)–12/31/04. |
|
|
** | The Adviser Class return for 2007 is from 1/01/07–12/05/07 (class ceased operations) |
The graph and the table do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Investment performance reflects the waiver of certain fees. Without the waiver of fees, the Fund’s total return would have been lower.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio Distributions* (Unaudited) | Top 10 Holdings* (Unaudited) |
Cash and Other Assets 6.4%
Municipal Bonds 0.1%
General Market Notes 3.1%
Variable Rate Demand Notes 90.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
| Port Corpus Christi Authority Nueces County |
| 4.98% |
|
2. |
| SEI Tax Exempt Trust - Institutional Tax Free |
| 3.94% |
|
3. |
| State Student Assistance Variable Education |
| 3.37% |
|
4. |
| Citizens Property Insurance Corp., High Risk |
| 3.07% |
|
5. |
| Geauga County Revenue, South Franklin |
| 3.07% |
|
6. |
| Austin Hotel Occupancy Tax Revenue, |
| 2.88% |
|
7. |
| Gainesville Utilities System Revenue - |
| 2.45% |
|
8. |
| Miami-Dade County School Board |
| 2.42% |
|
9. |
| BlackRock Liquidity Fund MuniCash Portfolio |
| 2.30% |
|
10. |
| Highlands County Health Facilities Authority, |
| 2.30% |
|
|
|
* | Portfolio holdings and sector distributions are as of 4/30/09 and are subject to change. Portfolio holdings are not recommendations to buy or sell any securities. Portfolio Distributions percentages are based on total investments and Top 10 Holdings percentages are based on total net assets. |
31
|
|
Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Comparative Annualized Returns as of 4/30/09 |
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Joint Return |
| Single Return |
| Marginal |
| Your Tax-Exempt Effective Yield |
| ||
| $ | 67,901 - 137,050 |
| $ | 33,950 - 82,250 |
| 25% |
| 1.37% |
|
| $ | 137,051 - 208,850 |
| $ | 82,251 - 171,550 |
| 28% |
| 1.43% |
|
| $ | 208,851 - 372,950 |
| $ | 171,551 - 372,950 |
| 33% |
| 1.54% |
|
| Over $372,950 |
| Over $372,950 |
| 35% |
| 1.58% |
| ||
The chart reflects projected 2009 marginal federal tax rates before limitations and phaseouts. Individuals with adjusted gross income in excess of $142,700 should consult a tax professional to determine their actual 2008 marginal tax rate.
Performance data quoted represents past performance and is not predictive of future results. Investment return and principal value of the Fund fluctuate, so that the shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance current to the most recent month end may be lower or higher than the performance quoted and may be obtained by calling 1-888-785-5578.
The Lipper Tax-Exempt Money Market Funds Average is an average of funds that invest in high quality municipal obligations with dollar-weighted average maturities of less than 90 days. The Lipper Tax-Exempt Money Market Funds Average is unmanaged and does not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment adviser fees. Lipper Rankings for the periods shown are based on Fund total returns with dividends and distributions reinvested and do not reflect sales charges. The performance for the Municipal Money Market Fund reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot directly invest in an index.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comparative Annualized Returns as of 4/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 Months (1) |
| 1 Year |
| 3 Years |
| 5 Years |
| Since Inception |
|
| Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund — Investor Class |
| 0.65% |
| 2.07% |
| 3.01% |
| 2.68% |
| 2.33% |
|
| Lipper Tax-Exempt Money Market Funds Average |
| 0.22% |
| 1.14% |
| 2.27% |
| 1.98% |
| 1.68% |
|
| Lipper Tax-Exempt Money Market Fund Rank — Investor Class |
| — |
| 1/102 |
| 1/91 |
| 1/81 |
| 1/73 |
|
| Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund — Investor Class, 7-day effective yield (as of 4/30/09): 1.03% |
| ||||||||||
|
|
(1) Not annualized. FINRA does not recognize rankings for less than one year. |
32
|
|
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund vs. Peer Performance (Unaudited)
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
Calendar Year
2003
Calendar Year
2004*
Calendar Year
2005
Calendar Year
2006
Calendar Year
2007
Calendar Year
2008
Calendar Year
2009 thru 4/30/09
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund – Investor Class
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund – Adviser Class
Lipper Short Municipal Debt Funds Average
4.26%
4.08%
4.01%
3.27%
4.14%
3.87%
3.11%
3.58%
3.34%
2.05%
1.74%
0.59%
1.02%
2.15%
2.21%
1.42%
0.12%
1.33%
1.15%
2.41%
|
|
* The Adviser Class return for 2004 is from 3/30/04 (inception)–12/31/04. | |
|
|
The graph and the table do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Investment performance reflects the waiver of certain fees. Without the waiver of fees, the Fund’s total return would have been lower. |
Performance data quoted represents past performance and is not predictive of future results. Investment return and principal value of the Fund fluctuate, so that the shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance current to the most recent month end may be lower or higher than performance quoted and may be obtained by calling 1-888-785-5578. Performance data shown does not reflect the 0.25% redemption fee imposed on shares held for fewer than one month. If it did, total returns would be reduced. Effective 10/12/07, Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Fund Adviser Class began imposing a maximum sales charge of 0.50% on purchases. Performance data shown for time period beginning with dates after 10/12/07 reflect the sales charge.
The Barclays Capital 1 Year Municipal Bond Index is the 1-year (1-2) component of the Municipal Bond Index. The Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index is a rules-based, market-value weighted index engineered for the long-term, tax-exempt bond market. Lipper Short Municipal Debt Funds Average is an unmanaged index that tracks funds that invest in municipal debt issues with dollar-weighted average maturities of less than three years. Lipper Rankings for the periods shown are based on Fund total returns with dividends and distributions reinvested and do not reflect sales charges. The Barclays Capital 1 Year Municipal Bond Index and the Lipper Short Municipal Debt Funds Average are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment adviser fees. The performance for the Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund reflects the deduction of fees for these value-added services. Investors cannot directly invest in an index.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |||||||||||||
| Comparative Annualized Returns as of 4/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6 Months (1) |
| 1 Year |
| 3 Years |
| 5 Years |
| Since Inception (2) |
| |
| Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund—Investor Class |
| 1.92% |
| 3.96% |
| 3.94% |
| 3.34% |
| 3.42% |
| |
| Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund—Investor Class |
| 1.90% |
| 3.90% |
| 3.72% |
| 3.04% |
| 3.08% |
| |
| Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund—Investor Class |
| 1.83% |
| 3.87% |
| 3.73% |
| 3.08% |
| 3.08% |
| |
| Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund—Adviser Class |
| 1.80% |
| 3.71% |
| 3.72% |
| 3.16% |
| 2.98% |
| |
| Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund—Adviser Class |
| 1.78% |
| 3.65% |
| 3.51% |
| 2.89% |
| 2.70% |
| |
| Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund—Adviser Class |
| 1.71% |
| 3.62% |
| 3.51% |
| 2.91% |
| 2.75% |
| |
| Barclays Capital 1 Year Municipal Bond Index |
| 2.97% |
| 4.41% |
| 4.37% |
| 3.18% |
| 2.88% |
| |
| Lipper Short Municipal Debt Funds Average |
| 2.12% |
| 1.51% |
| 2.49% |
| 2.22% |
| 2.11% |
| |
| Lipper Short Municipal Debt Fund Rank—Investor Class |
| — |
| 12/66 |
| 10/56 |
| 2/54 |
| 1/45 |
| |
|
|
(1) | Not annualized. FINRA does not recognize rankings for less than one year. |
|
|
(2) | Adviser Class shares commenced on March 30, 2004 and Investor Class shares commenced on December 6, 2002. Returns for indices are since December 6, 2002. |
33
|
|
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund | |
|
|
Portfolio Distributions* (Unaudited) | Top 10 Holdings* (Unaudited) |
Put Bonds 13.1%
Cash/Cash Equivalents(1) 0.0%
Auction Rate Notes 2.0%
Variable Rate
Demand Notes 75.6%
General Market Note 3.1%
Municipal Bonds 6.2%
(1) Less than 0.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
| Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority, |
| 3.79% |
|
2. |
|
| New York City Revenue, Subseries E4, |
| 3.79% |
|
3. |
|
| Jea Electrical Systems Revenue - Series |
| 3.67% |
|
4. |
|
| West Baton Rouge Parish Industrial Revenue, |
| 3.67% |
|
5. |
|
| Souderton Area School District, High School |
| 3.63% |
|
6. |
|
| Vernon Natural Gas Financing Agency, |
| 3.13% |
|
7. |
|
| Rockford Revenue, Wesley Willows |
| 3.07% |
|
8. |
|
| Plaquemines La Port Harbor & Terminal |
| 2.95% |
|
9. |
|
| Charlotte Airport Revenue, Series A, 7.500%, |
| 2.76% |
|
10. |
|
| Chicago Board of Education Revenue, |
| 2.67% |
|
|
|
|
| ||
* | Portfolio holdings and sector distributions are as of 4/30/09 and are subject to change. Portfolio holdings are not recommendations to buy or sell any securities. Portfolio Distributions percentages are based on total investments and Top 10 Holdings percentages are based on total net assets. |
|
Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund / Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund—Commentary |
We are pleased to bring you the semi-annual report for the Alpine Income Trust for the period ending April 30, 2009. The Income Trust includes both the Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund and the Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund.
Performance Summary
According to Lipper Analytical Services, the total return for the Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund was 1.92% and 0.65% for the Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund for the six month period ending April 30, 2009. The Lipper average was 2.12% and 0.22% for the Short Municipal Debt and Tax Exempt Money Market Fund Averages for the same period.
Market Overview
An intensifying credit crisis and severe recession roiled most financial markets, including municipal bonds, during the reporting period. Slumping home values, rising unemployment and plunging consumer confidence contributed to one of the worst recessions since the Great Depression, putting pressure on the fiscal conditions of most states and municipalities. Meanwhile, an ongoing credit crunch escalated into a global financial crisis that punished a number of large financial institutions, including major bond insurers and dealers.
Municipal bonds were adversely affected by widespread selling pressure, causing yield differences between municipal bonds and comparable U.S. Treasury securities to move towards historically wide levels. Volatility was particularly severe over the fourth quarter of 2008, when the bankruptcy of investment bank Lehman Brothers sent shockwaves through the global banking system. Municipal bonds regained a portion of their previous losses during the first quarter of 2009, when monetary and government authorities staged massive interventions to shore up the credit markets, a federal economic stimulus program sent billions in aid to the states, and investors took advantage of attractive values among bonds from fundamentally sound issuers. The short-intermediate segment of the municipal bond market rebounded more strongly than other maturity ranges as investors shifted assets from low yielding money market funds to municipal bonds with two to five year maturities.
Demand from retail investors for municipal securities has picked up markedly in recent months. However interest from retail alone was unable to support the market in the face of substantial unwinding of leveraged trades involving municipal bonds, selling related to margin calls, and a diminished list of broker-dealers willing to provide liquidity for tax free bonds. Given the continuing credit market stress, short and intermediate-term and AAA rated municipal securities
34
|
|
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund | |
had greatest appeal rather than long term and lower-quality issues.
Sector performance during the past six months was mixed. As expected, prerefunded and escrowed-to-maturity bonds were the segments that produced the most gains. Insured, education, transportation, and housing revenue bonds were mixed depending on the specific credits. Higher yielding bonds in the industrial revenue/pollution control revenue, tobacco, and life-care sectors were hammered as investors shunned lower quality credits.
The municipal supply in 2008 totaled $390 billion, according to The Bond Buyer. Most of this supply came during the first three quarters of the year, before credit markets seized up immediately following the collapse of Lehman Brothers in mid-September. With the national economy likely to be in a recession until at least midyear and with a significant stimulus package that will provide some direct capital spending to the states, we anticipate aggregate new borrowing in 2009 could be lower than in 2008.
Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund
Since our last letter to shareholders, markets have been severely tested, with the money markets at the epicenter of the turmoil. The flow of credit begins in the money markets, where lending all but shut down last fall. The aftershocks of this credit crunch continued to disrupt all financial markets. Investors fleeing falling markets have pushed demand for what they perceive to be the safe haven of money funds to record levels, while high quality investable supply has been sharply curtailed. The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy and the deepening credit problems facing banks have created an environment in which liquidity is of paramount concern. The forced merger of Bank of America with Merrill Lynch and Wells Fargo with Wachovia further reduced potential trading counterparties. These events and plunging equity markets provided the backdrop for extreme volatility in money market rates.
In many ways, municipal money markets have fared better than their taxable counterparts during these troubled times. Among other factors, the structure of municipal debt, such as variable rate demand notes with their mandatory tender feature, has enabled municipal money funds to maintain both liquidity and stability lacking in the taxable market. Nevertheless, municipal rates moved across a wide range in the past six months before ending the reporting period at the lowest levels of the year.
Our focus on managing your fund remains on stability of principal through proprietary credit research and on liquidity by maintaining a significant percentage of the portfolio in high quality variable rate demand notes. The remaining portion of the portfolio was invested in other tax exempt cash equivalent vehicles and select municipal securities. This has resulted in the average maturity of the fund ending the reporting period at seven days which continues to be shorter than the industry average. Fortunately, yield differences remained relatively narrow along the market’s maturity range, so this conservative positioning did not detract materially from the fund’s yield.
Looking ahead at the next six months, we anticipate challenges as credit markets sort themselves out. The Federal Reserve will likely remain on hold through most, if not all, of 2009. Money market rates should remain low and could continue to fall further as credit concerns ease. We intend to maintain the fund’s conservative credit selection strategy and weighted average maturity until we are confident that the volatility in the money market arena has passed.
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund
During the past six months, we continued the same strategy that we have been utilizing for the past year now. As a result, we positioned the fund with the following goals in mind: 1) to keep volatility low while still providing a competitive return, 2) to take advantage of the current interest rate environment while being mindful that interest rates are likely to eventually rise and 3) to be defensive in the face of declining credit quality in the municipal sector in light of a slowing economy while seeking to take advantage of the historically wide difference in yields between bonds of differing credit quality and maturities.
In this regard, the fund had an overweight in variable rate demand notes (VRDN) during our reporting period which provided the fund with a yield that approached, or exceeded the yield on municipal bonds farther out on the yield curve. Furthermore, we took advantage of several special situations in which we purchased specific high yielding VRDN’s prior to the securities either being refunded by longer-term deals or getting restructured with alternative credit enhancements. These opportunities proved to be especially rewarding as they not only provided the fund with an above average yield but also minimized any NAV fluctuation.
We rounded out the above mentioned purchases with select investments in tax exempt commercial paper and short maturity municipal bonds in the one-to three-year range. While we have been reluctant to extend further
35
|
|
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund | |
out on the yield curve, we felt that these purchases would provide a balance to our large position of VRDN’s.
While the municipal bond market has rallied during most of 2009, we have remained hesitant in selling our longer-term securities despite the paper gains that have been generated for several reasons. It is our goal to try to minimize capital gains if possible and maximize income, and selling these higher yielding investments would not be consistent with these two objectives.
Outlook
The national recession will reduce the tax revenues collected by state and local municipalities, contributing
to worries about a general decline in the overall credit quality of the municipal market. In addition, the credit environment for the municipal market is likely to remain challenging for some time. Nevertheless, many municipal issuers are making the difficult but necessary decisions to raise taxes, lower spending, or a combination of the two as they adjust to the economic downturn.
We believe the municipal market offers good long-term value, especially considering that tax rates are likely to rise in the next few years. As always, we will continue to scour the marketplace for attractive potential opportunities and adjust our strategies accordingly.
|
An investment in the Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund is neither insured nor guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the Funds seek to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Funds. |
|
Investing in these funds involves special risks, including but not limited to, investing in municipal obligations and derivative securities, mortgage-related and asset-backed investments. Please refer to the prospectus for further details. Investments in debt securities typically decrease in value when interest rates rise. This risk is usually greater for longer-term debt securities. Income from tax-exempt funds may be subject to state and local taxes and a portion of income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for certain investors. |
|
Please refer to the Schedule of Portfolio Investments for fund holding information. Fund holdings and sector allocations are subject to change and should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk. |
|
Lipper Analytical Services, Inc. is an independent mutual fund research and rating service. Each Lipper average represents a universe of Funds with similar invest objectives. Rankings for the periods shown include dividends and distributions reinvested and do not reflect sales charges. |
|
The federal government guarantees interest payments from government securities, such as U.S. Treasury bills, while dividend payments carry no such guarantee. Government securities, if held to maturity, guarantee the timely payment of principal and interest. |
36
|
Alpine Dynamic Balance Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
Common Stocks—64.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
Aerospace & Defense—1.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
15,000 |
| Honeywell International, Inc. |
| $ | 468,150 |
|
6,000 |
| L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. |
|
| 456,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 925,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Auto Components—1.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
30,500 |
| Autoliv, Inc. |
|
| 752,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Capital Markets—4.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
9,000 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (b) |
|
| 1,156,500 |
|
25,900 |
| State Street Corp. |
|
| 883,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,040,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Chemicals—1.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
3,200 |
| Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. |
|
| 210,880 |
|
5,000 |
| PPG Industries, Inc. |
|
| 220,250 |
|
25,000 |
| RPM International, Inc. |
|
| 345,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 776,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial Banks—1.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
18,000 |
| Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. |
|
| 333,180 |
|
6,000 |
| Bank of Florida Corp. (a) |
|
| 19,200 |
|
7,138 |
| Southside Bancshares, Inc. |
|
| 152,037 |
|
34,501 |
| Webster Financial Corp. |
|
| 180,440 |
|
10,432 |
| Wells Fargo & Company |
|
| 208,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 893,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial Services & Supplies—1.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
27,500 |
| McGrath RentCorp |
|
| 581,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Construction Materials—2.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
49,199 |
| Eagle Materials, Inc. |
|
| 1,367,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Consumer Finance—0.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
5,800 |
| The Student Loan Corp. |
|
| 279,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Containers & Packaging—0.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
10,000 |
| Temple-Inland, Inc. |
|
| 119,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Diversified Financial Services—3.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
43,041 |
| Bank of America Corp. |
|
| 384,356 |
|
40,000 |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
|
| 1,320,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,704,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Electric Utilities—3.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
51,000 |
| Allegheny Energy, Inc. |
|
| 1,321,920 |
|
6,900 |
| American Electric Power Co., Inc. |
|
| 182,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,503,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Electrical Equipment—2.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
30,000 |
| AMETEK, Inc. (b) |
|
| 966,300 |
|
15,000 |
| Emerson Electric Co. (b) |
|
| 510,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,476,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Food & Staples Retailing—4.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
200 |
| Arden Group, Inc. |
|
| 23,400 |
|
40,000 |
| CVS Caremark Corp. (b) |
|
| 1,271,200 |
|
20,000 |
| Sysco Corp. |
|
| 466,600 |
|
10,000 |
| Walgreen Co. |
|
| 314,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,075,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Food Products—1.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
12,000 |
| Kellogg Co. |
|
| 505,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies—1.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
8,600 |
| Becton, Dickinson & Co. |
|
| 520,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Health Care Providers & Services—0.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
13,000 |
| MEDNAX, Inc. (a) |
|
| 466,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
Common Stocks—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure—0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
10,000 |
| Darden Restaurants, Inc. |
| $ | 369,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Household Durables—2.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
20,000 |
| Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. |
|
| 269,000 |
|
20,000 |
| Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.— |
|
| 55,400 |
|
28,000 |
| Lennar Corp.—Class A |
|
| 272,720 |
|
30,000 |
| Pulte Homes, Inc. |
|
| 345,300 |
|
32,000 |
| Standard Pacific Corp. (a) |
|
| 59,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,002,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Household Products—0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
4,000 |
| Colgate-Palmolive Co. |
|
| 236,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Industrial Conglomerates—3.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
10,000 |
| 3M Co. |
|
| 576,000 |
|
74,600 |
| General Electric Co. |
|
| 943,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,519,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Insurance—1.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
20,000 |
| Ambac Financial Group, Inc. |
|
| 18,200 |
|
5,000 |
| Chubb Corp. |
|
| 194,750 |
|
12,227 |
| Fidelity National Financial, Inc.— |
|
| 221,676 |
|
13,100 |
| MBIA, Inc. (a) |
|
| 61,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 496,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
IT Services—0.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
5,374 |
| Fidelity National Information |
|
| 95,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Machinery—3.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
10,000 |
| Caterpillar, Inc. (b) |
|
| 355,800 |
|
15,200 |
| Ingersoll-Rand Co., Ltd. |
|
| 330,904 |
|
14,800 |
| Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. |
|
| 659,044 |
|
12,000 |
| PACCAR Inc. |
|
| 425,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,771,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Media—0.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
15,000 |
| The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. |
|
| 452,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Multiline Retail—1.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
25,000 |
| J.C. Penney Co., Inc. (b) |
|
| 767,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels—5.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
54,000 |
| CONSOL Energy, Inc. |
|
| 1,689,120 |
|
13,000 |
| Hess Corp. (b) |
|
| 712,270 |
|
20,000 |
| Penn Virginia Corp. |
|
| 281,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,682,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pharmaceuticals—3.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
4,000 |
| Abbott Laboratories |
|
| 167,400 |
|
27,000 |
| Johnson & Johnson |
|
| 1,413,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,581,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—6.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
20,000 |
| Annaly Capital Management, Inc. |
|
| 281,400 |
|
15,000 |
| Boston Properties, Inc. |
|
| 741,300 |
|
13,287 |
| Developers Diversified Realty Corp. |
|
| 54,877 |
|
45,000 |
| DiamondRock Hospitality Co. |
|
| 292,050 |
|
10,000 |
| Mack-Cali Realty Corp. |
|
| 268,600 |
|
12,700 |
| ProLogis |
|
| 115,697 |
|
13,307 |
| Simon Property Group, Inc. |
|
| 686,641 |
|
42,271 |
| Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. |
|
| 223,614 |
|
5,000 |
| Ventas, Inc. |
|
| 143,200 |
|
30,000 |
| Weingarten Realty Investors |
|
| 466,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,273,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
37
|
Alpine Dynamic Balance Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
Common Stocks—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Real Estate Management & Development—0.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
8,433 |
| Forestar Group, Inc. (a) |
| $ | 108,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Road & Rail—1.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
15,000 |
| Norfolk Southern Corp. (b) |
|
| 535,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance—0.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
75,600 |
| Fannie Mae |
|
| 58,968 |
|
8,433 |
| Guaranty Financial Group, Inc. (a) |
|
| 4,976 |
|
31,500 |
| New York Community Bancorp, Inc. |
|
| 356,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 420,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Trading Companies & Distributors—0.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
15,000 |
| WESCO International, Inc. (a) |
|
| 390,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Water Utilities—1.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
31,200 |
| SJW Corp. |
|
| 786,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Common Stocks |
|
| 32,477,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Investment Companies—0.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
7,406 |
| Medallion Financial Corp. |
|
| 54,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Investment Companies |
|
| 54,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
Bonds and Notes—20.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
U.S. Treasury Bonds—16.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
$ 3,000,000 |
| 6.000%, 02/15/2026 |
| $ | 3,731,253 |
|
4,000,000 |
| 5.250%, 11/15/2028 |
|
| 4,613,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 8,345,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
U.S. Treasury Notes—4.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,000,000 |
| 5.000%, 08/15/2011 |
|
| 2,182,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Bonds and Notes |
|
| 10,527,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Short-Term Investments—13.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
6,828,703 |
| Federated Treasury |
|
| 6,828,703 |
|
|
| Total Short-Term Investments |
|
| 6,828,703 |
|
|
| Total Investments |
|
| 49,887,911 |
|
|
| Other Assets in Excess of |
|
| 406,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| TOTAL NET ASSETS—100.0% |
| $ | 50,294,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Written Option Contracts | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
| Value |
| |
|
|
|
| |||
Call Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
| AMETEK, Inc. |
| $ | 3,735 |
|
100 |
| Caterpillar, Inc. |
|
| 41,000 |
|
200 |
| CVS Caremark Corp. |
|
| 44,000 |
|
75 |
| Emerson Electric Co. |
|
| 9,375 |
|
50 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
|
| 32,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
| Value |
| |
|
|
|
| |||
80 |
| Hess Corp. |
| $ | 5,200 |
|
250 |
| J.C. Penney Co., Inc. |
|
| 207,500 |
|
100 |
| Norfolk Southern Corp. |
|
| 2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Written Option Contracts |
| $ | 345,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages are stated as a percent of net assets. | |
|
|
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
|
|
(b) | All or a portion of the shares have been committed as collateral for written option contracts. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
38
|
Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
| Security |
|
| Value |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Common Stocks—95.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
Banks—0.4% |
|
|
|
|
| |
118,782 |
| Svenska Handelsbanken |
| $ | 2,093,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Capital Goods—2.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
112,800 |
| Raytheon Co. |
|
| 5,101,944 |
|
116,000 |
| Schneider Electric SA |
|
| 8,888,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 13,989,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial & Professional Services—0.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
2 |
| De La Rue |
|
| 29 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial Services & Supplies—1.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
225,070 |
| Healthcare Services Group, Inc. |
|
| 4,024,252 |
|
134,400 |
| Waste Management, Inc. |
|
| 3,584,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 7,608,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Consumer Durables & Apparel—2.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
48,500 |
| Nike, Inc. |
|
| 2,544,795 |
|
78,629 |
| VF Corp. |
|
| 4,660,341 |
|
90,800 |
| Whirlpool Corp. |
|
| 4,100,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 11,305,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Consumer Services—1.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
162,900 |
| McDonald’s Corp. |
|
| 8,680,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Diversified Financials—4.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,500,000 |
| Anglo Irish Bank Corp. PLC (a) |
|
| 0 |
|
36,300 |
| BlackRock, Inc. |
|
| 5,318,676 |
|
9,900 |
| CME Group, Inc. |
|
| 2,191,365 |
|
234,100 |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
|
| 7,725,300 |
|
349,900 |
| Morgan Stanley |
|
| 8,271,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 23,506,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Energy—9.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,700 |
| Chevron Corp. |
|
| 8,176,570 |
|
24,900 |
| CONSOL Energy, Inc. |
|
| 778,872 |
|
40,100 |
| Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. |
|
| 2,903,641 |
|
212,500 |
| ENI SPA |
|
| 4,625,066 |
|
166,900 |
| Hess Corp. |
|
| 9,144,451 |
|
147,500 |
| Petroleo Brasileiro SA—ADR |
|
| 4,951,575 |
|
37,500 |
| Schlumberger, Ltd. |
|
| 1,837,125 |
|
632,700 |
| SeaDrill, Ltd. |
|
| 6,900,167 |
|
328,687 |
| Statoil ASA |
|
| 6,248,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 45,565,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Food & Staples Retailing—6.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
224,000 |
| Carrefour SA |
|
| 9,155,015 |
|
152,300 |
| CVS Caremark Corp. |
|
| 4,840,094 |
|
224,800 |
| Koninklijke Ahold NV |
|
| 2,478,213 |
|
350,000 |
| The Kroger Co. |
|
| 7,567,000 |
|
145,000 |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
|
| 7,308,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 31,348,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Food Beverage & Tobacco—6.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
503,419 |
| B&G Foods, Inc. |
|
| 3,080,924 |
|
113,500 |
| Groupe Danone |
|
| 5,426,466 |
|
172,400 |
| The J.M. Smucker Co. |
|
| 6,792,560 |
|
279,500 |
| Molson Coors Brewing Co. |
|
| 10,690,875 |
|
102,900 |
| PepsiCo, Inc. |
|
| 5,120,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 31,111,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Health Care Equipment & Services—6.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
68,000 |
| Alcon, Inc. |
|
| 6,256,680 |
|
175,500 |
| Baxter International, Inc. |
|
| 8,511,750 |
|
132,600 |
| Becton, Dickinson & Co. |
|
| 8,019,648 |
|
432,325 |
| Meridian Bioscience, Inc. |
|
| 7,513,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 30,301,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
| Security |
|
| Value |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Common Stocks—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Household & Personal Products—4.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
436,246 |
| Avon Products, Inc. |
| $ | 9,928,959 |
|
110,800 |
| Beiersdorf AG |
|
| 4,568,044 |
|
94,900 |
| Colgate-Palmolive Co. |
|
| 5,599,100 |
|
44,500 |
| The Procter & Gamble Co. |
|
| 2,200,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 22,296,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Insurance—1.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
155,700 |
| Chubb Corp. |
|
| 6,064,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Materials—11.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
17,300 |
| Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. |
|
| 1,140,070 |
|
50,500 |
| Akzo Nobel NV |
|
| 2,131,450 |
|
238,161 |
| Antofagasta |
|
| 2,078,716 |
|
161,400 |
| Arcelormittal Sa |
|
| 3,805,812 |
|
109,300 |
| BASF SE |
|
| 4,124,723 |
|
49,500 |
| BHP Billiton, Ltd.—ADR |
|
| 2,382,930 |
|
1,054,255 |
| Israel Chemicals, Ltd. |
|
| 8,836,479 |
|
177,000 |
| K&S AG |
|
| 10,667,306 |
|
145,700 |
| Monsanto Co. |
|
| 12,368,473 |
|
87,000 |
| Nucor Corp. |
|
| 3,540,030 |
|
15,000 |
| Praxair, Inc. |
|
| 1,119,150 |
|
103,300 |
| Sonoco Products Co. |
|
| 2,521,553 |
|
287,800 |
| Steel Dynamics, Inc. |
|
| 3,583,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 58,299,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Media—3.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,500 |
| Lagardere S.C.A. |
|
| 5,171,299 |
|
735,258 |
| Regal Entertainment Group— |
|
| 9,602,469 |
|
78,901 |
| Time Warner Cable, Inc. (a) |
|
| 2,542,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 17,316,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology—1.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
105,200 |
| Abbott Laboratories |
|
| 4,402,620 |
|
42,700 |
| Johnson & Johnson |
|
| 2,235,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 6,638,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Retailing—2.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
56,500 |
| Abercrombie & Fitch Co.— |
|
| 1,528,890 |
|
98,500 |
| Hennes & Mauritz AB—Class B |
|
| 4,438,674 |
|
297,900 |
| Lowe’s Companies, Inc. |
|
| 6,404,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 12,372,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor |
|
|
|
| ||
420,500 |
| Intel Corp. |
|
| 6,635,490 |
|
453,100 |
| Microchip Technology, Inc. |
|
| 10,421,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 17,056,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Software & Services—2.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
126,000 |
| Cap Gemini SA |
|
| 4,735,419 |
|
348,600 |
| Microsoft Corp. (c) |
|
| 7,062,636 |
|
37,900 |
| Oracle Corp. (a) |
|
| 732,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 12,531,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Technology Hardware & Equipment—3.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
195,000 |
| Hewlett-Packard Co. |
|
| 7,016,100 |
|
62,800 |
| International Business |
|
| 6,481,588 |
|
83,800 |
| Qualcomm, Inc. |
|
| 3,546,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 17,044,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
39
|
Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Telecommunication Services—7.9% |
|
|
| |||
298,600 |
| AT&T, Inc. |
| $ | 7,650,132 |
|
222,500 |
| CenturyTel, Inc. |
|
| 6,040,875 |
|
1,088,100 |
| Deutsche Telekom AG |
|
| 13,158,552 |
|
36,400 |
| Mobistar SA |
|
| 2,187,468 |
|
10,061,900 |
| PCCW Ltd. |
|
| 4,583,004 |
|
406,388 |
| Telkom SA Ltd. (b) |
|
| 5,147,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 38,767,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Transportation—1.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
88,700 |
| CSX Corp. |
|
| 2,624,633 |
|
83,600 |
| Norfolk Southern Corp. |
|
| 2,982,848 |
|
28,800 |
| Union Pacific Corp. |
|
| 1,415,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 7,022,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Utilities—9.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,100 |
| Allegheny Energy, Inc. |
|
| 1,117,152 |
|
165,300 |
| E.ON AG |
|
| 5,607,690 |
|
505,500 |
| Endesa SA |
|
| 10,948,710 |
|
159,000 |
| FPL Group, Inc. |
|
| 8,552,610 |
|
59,000 |
| GDF Suez |
|
| 2,118,941 |
|
248,800 |
| ITC Holdings Corp. |
|
| 10,830,264 |
|
350,100 |
| Northeast Utilities |
|
| 7,359,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 46,534,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Common Stocks |
|
| 467,456,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
| Security |
|
| Value |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Short-Term Investments—7.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
984 |
| Alpine Municipal Money |
| $ | 984 |
|
37,744,953 |
| Federated Treasury Obligations |
|
| 37,744,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Short-Term Investments |
|
| 37,745,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Investments |
|
| 505,202,686 |
|
|
| Liabilities in Excess of Other |
|
| (15,043,573) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| TOTAL NET ASSETS—100.0% |
| $ | 490,159,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages are stated as a percent of net assets. | |
| |
ADR—American Depository Receipt | |
| |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
|
|
(b) | All or a portion of the shares have been committed as collateral for swap contracts. |
|
|
(c) | All or a portion of the shares have been committed as collateral for forward currency contracts. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
40
|
Alpine Dynamic Financial Services Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
| Security |
|
| Value |
|
|
|
| ||||
| ||||||
Common Stocks—91.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
Capital Markets—26.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
30,850 |
| BGC Partners, Inc. |
| $ | 79,902 |
|
20,000 |
| Blackstone Group LP |
|
| 195,800 |
|
19,700 |
| Cowen Group, Inc. (a) |
|
| 113,669 |
|
10,400 |
| FCStone Group, Inc. (a) |
|
| 32,136 |
|
18,500 |
| GFI Group, Inc. |
|
| 75,480 |
|
1,500 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
|
| 192,750 |
|
2,000 |
| Investment Technology Group, |
|
| 45,560 |
|
41,500 |
| JMP Group, Inc. |
|
| 223,685 |
|
1,000 |
| Legg Mason, Inc. |
|
| 20,070 |
|
25,100 |
| MF Global Ltd. (a) |
|
| 153,110 |
|
2,000 |
| Och-Ziff Capital Management |
|
| 14,880 |
|
7,500 |
| OptionsXpress Holdings, Inc. |
|
| 123,450 |
|
38,489 |
| Sanders Morris Harris Group, Inc. |
|
| 173,970 |
|
6,900 |
| Thomas Weisel Partners Group, |
|
| 31,188 |
|
4,000 |
| TradeStation Group, Inc. (a) |
|
| 32,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,508,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial Banks—24.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
3,100 |
| American Community |
|
| 24,894 |
|
75,000 |
| Banco do Estado do Rio Grande |
|
| 244,980 |
|
26,600 |
| Banco Panamericano SA |
|
| 45,084 |
|
1,000 |
| Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. |
|
| 18,510 |
|
12,400 |
| Bank of Florida Corp. (a) |
|
| 39,680 |
|
2,428 |
| Barclays PLC |
|
| 10,111 |
|
15,000 |
| California United Bank (a) |
|
| 142,125 |
|
4,000 |
| Cardinal Financial Corp. |
|
| 31,400 |
|
21,194 |
| Citizens First Corp. |
|
| 123,985 |
|
4,700 |
| Community National Bank of |
|
| 17,625 |
|
4,000 |
| First Business Financial |
|
| 50,280 |
|
1,260 |
| First Community Bank Corp. of |
|
| 5,166 |
|
500 |
| ICICI Bank Ltd.—ADR |
|
| 10,315 |
|
10,000 |
| KeyCorp |
|
| 61,500 |
|
930 |
| MB Financial, Inc. |
|
| 12,676 |
|
10,200 |
| New Centry Bancorp, Inc. (a) |
|
| 55,080 |
|
2,000 |
| North Valley Bancorp |
|
| 9,660 |
|
2,375 |
| Old Point Financial Corp. |
|
| 44,745 |
|
12,042 |
| Pacific Mercantile Bancorp (a) |
|
| 40,702 |
|
568 |
| PNC Financial Services Group |
|
| 22,549 |
|
3,120 |
| Rurban Financial Corp. |
|
| 26,208 |
|
2,388 |
| The South Financial Group, Inc. |
|
| 3,964 |
|
13,750 |
| Southern National Bancorp of |
|
| 89,375 |
|
5,000 |
| State Bancorp, Inc. |
|
| 41,200 |
|
2,500 |
| Sterling Bancorp |
|
| 28,600 |
|
7,500 |
| Sterling Bancshares, Inc. |
|
| 49,875 |
|
6,000 |
| Summit State Bank |
|
| 39,840 |
|
500 |
| Superior Bancorp (a) |
|
| 2,115 |
|
1,200 |
| Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (a) |
|
| 16,800 |
|
15,000 |
| Tidelands Bancshares, Inc. (a) |
|
| 56,100 |
|
2,315 |
| Valley Community Bancorp (a) |
|
| 18,983 |
|
1,000 |
| Wintrust Financial Corp. |
|
| 17,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,401,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
|
| |||
| ||||||
Common Stocks—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial Services & Supplies—0.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
3,500 |
| Experian Group, Ltd. |
| $ | 23,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Diversified Financial Services—18.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
7,124 |
| BM&F Bovespa SA |
|
| 28,868 |
|
125,000 |
| Bolsa Mexicana de Valores SA |
|
| 97,421 |
|
20,000 |
| CIT Group, Inc. |
|
| 44,400 |
|
665 |
| CME Group, Inc. |
|
| 147,198 |
|
3,000 |
| Hong Kong Exchanges and |
|
| 34,993 |
|
5,173 |
| Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (a) |
|
| 76,302 |
|
4,315 |
| IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (a) |
|
| 377,994 |
|
7,000 |
| The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. (a) |
|
| 134,610 |
|
4,000 |
| NYSE Euronext |
|
| 92,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1,034,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Industrial Conglomerates—1.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
7,000 |
| General Electric Co. |
|
| 88,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Insurance—3.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
500 |
| China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.—ADR |
|
| 26,475 |
|
8,000 |
| CRM Holdings, Ltd. (a) |
|
| 8,000 |
|
5,000 |
| Lincoln National Corp. |
|
| 56,200 |
|
4,700 |
| Tower Group, Inc. |
|
| 127,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 218,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Internet Software & Services—4.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,000 |
| Bankrate, Inc. (a) |
|
| 25,000 |
|
275,618 |
| Goldleaf Financial Solutions, |
|
| 201,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 226,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
IT Services—1.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
15,000 |
| Online Resources Corp. (a) |
|
| 64,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance—10.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
36,400 |
| Alliance Bancorp, Inc. |
|
| 302,120 |
|
1,700 |
| Astoria Financial Corp. |
|
| 14,042 |
|
5,000 |
| Central Federal Corp. |
|
| 16,250 |
|
2,144 | �� | Fidelity Bancorp, Inc. |
|
| 18,835 |
|
10,000 |
| First Keystone Financial, Inc. (a) |
|
| 75,900 |
|
5,895 |
| First Pactrust Bancorp, Inc. |
|
| 47,160 |
|
1,100 |
| Parkvale Financial Corp. |
|
| 11,671 |
|
10,000 |
| United Western Bancorp, Inc. |
|
| 92,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 578,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Transportation Infrastructure—0.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
13,000 |
| CAI International, Inc. (a) |
|
| 47,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Common Stocks |
|
| 5,190,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Companies—6.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
30,000 |
| Allied Capital Corp. |
|
| 73,800 |
|
9,500 |
| Direxion Daily Financial Bear |
|
| 79,135 |
|
1,000 |
| Direxion Daily Large Cap Bear |
|
| 44,600 |
|
2,500 |
| ProShares Ultra Financials |
|
| 141,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Investment Companies |
|
| 338,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
41
|
Alpine Dynamic Financial Services Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
| ||||||
Short-Term Investments—1.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
83,868 |
| Federated Treasury |
| $ | 83,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Short-Term Investments |
|
| 83,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Investments |
|
| 5,613,413 |
|
|
| Other Assets in Excess of |
|
| 54,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| TOTAL NET ASSETS—100.0% |
| $ | 5,667,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages are stated as a percent of net assets. |
|
ADR—American Depository Receipt |
|
(a) Non-income producing security. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
42
|
Alpine Dynamic Innovators Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shares |
| Security |
|
| Value |
|
|
|
| |||||
| |||||||
Common Stocks—116.2% |
|
|
|
| |||
Aerospace & Defense—5.2% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 8,000 |
| Aerovironment, Inc. (a) |
| $ | 189,280 |
|
| 15,000 |
| BE Aerospace, Inc. (a) |
|
| 161,850 |
|
| 10,000 |
| Hexcel Corp. (a) |
|
| 95,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 447,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Auto Components—1.9% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 32,857 |
| Westport Innovations, |
|
| 165,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Chemicals—0.7% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 30,000 |
| Flotek Industrials, Inc. (a) |
|
| 62,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial Services & Supplies—5.4% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 7,000 |
| Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. |
|
| 461,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Communications Equipment—3.6% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 40,000 |
| Alvarion, Ltd. (a) |
|
| 125,200 |
|
| 10,000 |
| Polycom, Inc. (a) |
|
| 186,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 311,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Computers & Peripherals—10.0% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 5,000 |
| Hewlett-Packard Co. |
|
| 179,900 |
|
| 33,000 |
| Logitech International SA (a) |
|
| 439,560 |
|
| 26,000 |
| Stratasys, Inc. (a) |
|
| 243,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 862,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Diversified Financial Services—6.0% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 1,000 |
| CME Group, Inc. |
|
| 221,350 |
|
| 8,500 |
| Portfolio Recovery Associates, |
|
| 297,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 518,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Electrical Equipment—5.0% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 35,000 |
| LSI Industries, Inc. |
|
| 196,350 |
|
| 57,000 |
| PowerSecure International, Inc. (a) |
|
| 235,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 432,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & |
|
|
|
| |||
| 21,000 |
| FLIR Systems, Inc. (a) |
|
| 465,780 |
|
| 13,000 |
| Itron, Inc. (a) |
|
| 598,000 |
|
| 12,975 |
| MOCON, Inc. |
|
| 126,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,190,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Energy Equipment & Services—0.7% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 25,000 |
| ION Geophysical Corp. (a) |
|
| 62,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies—20.5% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 15,000 |
| Abiomed, Inc. (a) |
|
| 100,050 |
|
| 4,000 |
| Alcon, Inc. |
|
| 368,040 |
|
| 16,000 |
| ArthroCare Corp. (a) |
|
| 128,800 |
|
| 10,000 |
| Hologic, Inc. (a) |
|
| 148,600 |
|
| 2,800 |
| Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (a) | . |
| 402,444 |
|
| 10,000 |
| Medtronic, Inc. |
|
| 320,000 |
|
| 19,846 |
| Synovis Life Technologies, Inc. (a) |
|
| 301,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,769,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shares |
| Security |
|
| Value |
|
|
|
| |||||
| |||||||
Common Stocks—continued |
|
|
|
| |||
Health Care Providers & Services—9.9% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 3,300 |
| CardioNet, Inc. (a) |
| $ | 68,475 |
|
| 5,000 |
| HMS Holdings Corp. (a) |
|
| 149,900 |
|
| 28,000 |
| inVentiv Health, Inc. (a) |
|
| 310,520 |
|
| 8,000 |
| MEDNAX, Inc. (a) |
|
| 287,200 |
|
| 10,000 |
| NightHawk Radiology Holdings, |
|
| 35,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 851,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Health Care Technology—1.4% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 10,000 |
| Allscripts Healthcare |
|
| 124,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure—4.3% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 20,000 |
| Life Time Fitness, Inc. (a) |
|
| 375,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Internet & Catalog Retail—4.5% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 4,000 |
| Priceline.com, Inc. (a) |
|
| 388,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
IT Services—1.5% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 5,000 |
| Redecard SA—ADR (b) |
|
| 127,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Life Sciences Tools & Services—9.9% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 10,000 |
| Charles River Laboratories |
|
| 276,500 |
|
| 10,000 |
| Life Technologies Corp. (a) |
|
| 373,000 |
|
| 55,216 |
| Sequenom, Inc. (a) |
|
| 199,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 849,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Machinery—5.9% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 4,000 |
| Flowserve Corp. |
|
| 271,600 |
|
| 5,391 |
| Middleby Corp. (a) |
|
| 235,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 507,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Metals & Mining—0.4% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 125,000 |
| Imdex Ltd. |
|
| 30,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Software—5.6% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 16,400 |
| Ansys, Inc. (a) |
|
| 452,968 |
|
| 13,000 |
| Scientific Learning Corp. (a) |
|
| 28,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 481,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Total Common Stocks |
|
| 10,019,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Short-Term Investments—0.0% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 928 |
| Federated Treasury |
|
| 928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Total Short-Term Investments |
|
| 928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Total Investments (Cost $18,829,002)—116.2% |
|
| 10,020,134 |
|
|
|
| Liabilities in Excess of Other |
|
| (1,393,956 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| TOTAL NET ASSETS—100.0% |
| $ | 8,626,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages are stated as a percent of net assets.
ADR—American Depository Receipt
|
|
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
|
|
(b) | Restricted under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. These securities have been determined to be liquid under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees. Securities restricted under Rule 144A comprised 1.5% of the Fund’s net assets. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
43
|
Alpine Dynamic Transformations Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
| Security |
| Value |
| ||
|
|
| |||||
| |||||||
Common Stocks—89.0% |
|
|
|
| |||
Aerospace & Defense—4.3% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 3,000 |
| Aerovironment, Inc. (a) |
| $ | 70,980 |
|
| 4,000 |
| BE Aerospace, Inc. (a) |
|
| 43,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 114,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Auto Components—7.7% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 6,000 |
| Autoliv, Inc. |
|
| 148,020 |
|
| 10,000 |
| Exide Technologies (a) |
|
| 54,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 202,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Chemicals—3.8% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 10,000 |
| Flotek Industries, Inc. (a) |
|
| 20,700 |
|
| 2,000 |
| Mosaic Co. |
|
| 80,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 101,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial Banks—3.0% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 1,000 |
| PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. |
|
| 39,700 |
|
| 1,991 |
| Wells Fargo & Co. |
|
| 39,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 79,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Computers & Peripherals—5.9% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 3,000 |
| Hewlett-Packard Co. |
|
| 107,940 |
|
| 5,000 |
| Stratasys, Inc. (a) |
|
| 46,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 154,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Diversified Financial Services—4.2% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 500 |
| CME Group, Inc. |
|
| 110,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & |
|
|
|
| |||
| Components—4.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
| 4,940 |
| FLIR Systems, Inc. (a) |
|
| 109,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies—8.0% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 10,000 |
| Abiomed, Inc. (a) |
|
| 66,700 |
|
| 1,000 |
| Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (a) |
|
| 143,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 210,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Health Care Providers & Services—4.0% |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3,000 |
| Emergency Medical Services |
|
| 104,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure—4.4% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 8,000 |
| Starbucks Corp. (a) |
|
| 115,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
| Security |
| Value |
| ||
|
|
| |||||
| |||||||
Common Stocks—continued |
|
|
|
| |||
Household Durables—11.3% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 200 |
| NVR, Inc. (a) |
| $ | 101,074 |
|
| 3,000 |
| Pulte Homes, Inc. |
|
| 34,530 |
|
| 3,000 |
| Ryland Group, Inc. |
|
| 62,130 |
|
| 3,000 |
| Snap-On, Inc. |
|
| 101,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 299,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Industrial Conglomerates—1.6% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 3,300 |
| General Electric Co. |
|
| 41,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Internet & Catalog Retail—5.5% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 1,500 |
| Priceline.com, Inc. (a) |
|
| 145,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Machinery—16.0% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 7,300 |
| Ingersoll-Rand Company, Ltd. |
|
| 158,921 |
|
| 10,000 |
| Pall Corp. |
|
| 264,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 423,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels—4.9% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 2,000 |
| CONSOL Energy, Inc. |
|
| 62,560 |
|
| 3,000 |
| Walter Energy, Inc. |
|
| 68,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 130,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—0.3% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 1,095 |
| Walter Investment Management |
|
| 8,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Total Common Stocks |
|
| 2,352,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Short-Term Investments—5.3% |
|
|
|
| |||
| 139,328 |
| Federated Treasury |
|
| 139,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Total Short-Term Investments |
|
| 139,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Total Investments |
|
| 2,492,157 |
|
|
|
| Other Assets in Excess of |
|
| 149,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| TOTAL NET ASSETS—100.0% |
| $ | 2,641,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages are stated as a percent of net assets.
|
|
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
44
|
Alpine Accelerating Dividend Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common Stocks—78.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
Aerospace & Defense—6.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
600 |
| General Dynamics Corp. |
| $ | 31,002 |
|
400 |
| L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. |
|
| 30,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 61,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Chemicals—3.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
800 |
| Sigma-Aldrich Corp. |
|
| 35,072 |
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial Services & Supplies—5.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,400 |
| McGrath RentCorp. |
|
| 29,596 |
|
1,100 |
| Waste Management, Inc. |
|
| 29,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 58,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Communications Equipment—2.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
800 |
| Harris Corp. |
|
| 24,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Containers & Packaging—5.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
800 |
| Bemis Co. |
|
| 19,232 |
|
1,250 |
| Sonoco Products Co. |
|
| 30,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 49,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Diversified Consumer Services—2.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,200 |
| Hillenbrand, Inc. |
|
| 21,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Diversified Telecommunication Services—2.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
800 |
| AT&T, Inc. |
|
| 20,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Electric Utilities—2.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
900 |
| NSTAR |
|
| 28,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Food & Staples Retailing—2.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,250 |
| Sysco Corp. |
|
| 29,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food Products—6.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,150 |
| Campbell Soup Co. |
|
| 29,578 |
|
625 |
| General Mills, Inc. |
|
| 31,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 61,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Gas Utilities—2.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
900 |
| WGL Holdings, Inc. |
|
| 28,026 |
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies—8.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
350 |
| Alcon, Inc. |
|
| 32,203 |
|
400 |
| Becton, Dickinson & Co. |
|
| 24,192 |
|
1,000 |
| Dentsply International, Inc. |
|
| 28,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 85,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common Stocks—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Household Products—7.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
550 |
| Colgate-Palmolive Co. |
| $ | 32,450 |
|
550 |
| Kimberly-Clark Corp. |
|
| 27,027 |
|
700 |
| WD-40 Co. |
|
| 18,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 78,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Insurance—3.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
800 |
| Chubb Corp. |
|
| 31,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
IT Services—2.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
400 |
| Accenture Ltd. |
|
| 11,772 |
|
500 |
| Automatic Data Processing, Inc. |
|
| 17,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 29,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Media—2.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
750 |
| John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
|
| 25,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Multi-Utilities—3.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
750 |
| Wisconsin Energy Corp. |
|
| 29,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels—4.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
500 |
| Chevron Corp. |
|
| 33,050 |
|
200 |
| Occidental Petroleum Corp. |
|
| 11,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 44,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pharmaceuticals—1.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
400 |
| Abbott Laboratories |
|
| 16,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Transportation—2.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
350 |
| Burlington Northern Santa Fe |
|
| 23,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Common Stocks |
|
| 782,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Short-Term Investments—25.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
253,445 |
| Federated Treasury |
|
| 253,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Short-Term Investments |
|
| 253,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Investments |
|
| 1,036,177 |
|
|
| Liabilities in Excess of Other |
|
| (33,013 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| TOTAL NET ASSETS—100.0% |
| $ | 1,003,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages are stated as a percent of net assets. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
45
|
Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds—88.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
Alabama—1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,500,000 |
| Muscle Shoals Industrial |
| $ | 4,500,000 |
|
5,550,000 |
| Prichard/University of Mobile |
|
| 5,550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 10,050,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Alaska—0.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
675,000 |
| Industrial Development & Export |
|
| 675,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Arizona—0.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,074,000 |
| Phoenix Industrial Development |
|
| 2,074,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Colorado—1.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,360,000 |
| Housing & Finance Authority |
|
| 2,360,000 |
|
6,500,000 |
| Housing & Finance Authority |
|
| 6,500,000 |
|
1,475,000 |
| Housing & Finance Authority |
|
| 1,475,000 |
|
1,847,000 |
| Jefferson County Industrial |
|
| 1,847,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 12,182,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Florida—15.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
20,000,000 |
| Citizens Property Insurance Corp., |
|
| 20,016,423 |
|
16,000,000 |
| Gainesville Utilities System |
|
| 16,000,000 |
|
15,000,000 |
| Highlands County Health Facilities |
|
| 15,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Florida—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
7,995,000 |
| Hillsborough County Aviation |
| $ | 7,995,000 |
|
9,000,000 |
| Kissimmee Utilities Authority |
|
| 9,000,000 |
|
2,800,000 |
| Miami-Dade County Industrial |
|
| 2,800,000 |
|
15,800,000 |
| Miami-Dade County School Board |
|
| 15,800,000 |
|
4,240,000 |
| St. Johns County Housing Finance |
|
| 4,240,000 |
|
7,000,000 |
| Sunshine State Governmental |
|
| 7,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 97,851,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Georgia—1.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
4,000,000 |
| Fulton County Development |
|
| 4,000,000 |
|
2,200,000 |
| State Ports Authority Revenue, |
|
| 2,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 6,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Illinois—6.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
410,000 |
| Carol Stream Industrial |
|
| 410,000 |
|
11,000,000 |
| Chicago Board of Education School |
|
| 11,000,000 |
|
4,550,000 |
| Chicago Industrial Development |
|
| 4,550,000 |
|
4,300,000 |
| Chicago Industrial Development |
|
| 4,300,000 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
46
|
Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Illinois—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
400,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
| $ | 400,000 |
|
655,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
|
| 655,000 |
|
1,500,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
|
| 1,500,000 |
|
2,125,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
|
| 2,125,000 |
|
440,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
|
| 440,000 |
|
2,500,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
|
| 2,500,000 |
|
1,140,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
|
| 1,140,000 |
|
3,000,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
|
| 3,000,000 |
|
2,800,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
|
| 2,800,000 |
|
1,005,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
|
| 1,005,000 |
|
1,250,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
|
| 1,250,000 |
|
4,000,000 |
| Phoenix Realty Special Account— |
|
| 4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Illinois—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
2,940,000 |
| Woodridge Du Page Will & Cook |
| $ | 2,940,000 |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| 44,015,000 |
| ||
|
|
| ||||
Indiana—3.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,700,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
|
| 1,700,000 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Hammond Economic Development |
|
| 1,000,000 |
|
3,385,000 |
| Hobart Economic Development |
|
| 3,385,000 |
|
6,800,000 |
| Huntington Economic Development |
|
| 6,800,000 |
|
10,000,000 |
| Indianapolis Local Public |
|
| 10,000,000 |
|
67,000 |
| Noblesville Economic Development |
|
| 67,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 22,952,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Iowa—2.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
4,475,000 |
| Lakes Trust Finance Authority |
|
| 4,475,000 |
|
4,590,000 |
| Lakes Trust Finance Authority |
|
| 4,590,000 |
|
4,870,000 |
| Sargeant Bluff Industrial |
|
| 4,870,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 13,935,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Kansas—0.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,110,000 |
| State Development Finance |
|
| 1,110,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Kentucky—2.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
300,000 |
| Bardstown Industrial Development |
|
| 300,000 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
47
|
Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Kentucky—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
640,000 |
| Hancock County Industrial |
| $ | 640,000 |
|
6,900,000 |
| Hopkins County Industrial Building |
|
| 6,900,000 |
|
6,000,000 |
| Minor Lane Heights Solid Waste |
|
| 6,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 13,840,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Michigan—1.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
7,600,000 |
| Strategic Fund Limited Obligation |
|
| 7,600,000 |
|
1,200,000 |
| Strategic Fund Limited Obligation |
|
| 1,200,000 |
|
500,000 |
| Strategic Fund Limited Obligation |
|
| 500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 9,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Minnesota—0.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,570,000 |
| Blooming Prairie Industrial |
|
| 1,570,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Mississippi—2.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
4,000,000 |
| Business Finance Corporation, |
|
| 4,000,000 |
|
10,000,000 |
| Business Finance Corporation, |
|
| 10,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 14,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Missouri—1.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,500,000 |
| Greene County Industrial |
|
| 1,500,000 |
|
3,350,000 |
| Springfield Industrial Development |
|
| 3,350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Missouri—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
1,790,000 |
| St. Charles County Industrial |
| $ | 1,790,000 |
|
2,000,000 |
| St. Joseph Industrial Development |
|
| 2,000,000 |
|
800,000 |
| State Environmental Improvement |
|
| 800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 9,440,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Nevada—0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
4,300,000 |
| Winnemucca Economic |
|
| 4,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New Mexico—0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,305,000 |
| Albuquerque Industrial |
|
| 1,305,000 |
|
1,930,000 |
| Las Cruces Industrial Development |
|
| 1,930,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,235,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New York—6.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
14,850,000 |
| Metropolitan Transportation |
|
| 14,850,000 |
|
7,000,000 |
| Metropolitan Transportation |
|
| 7,000,000 |
|
430,000 |
| New York City Industrial |
|
| 430,000 |
|
5,000,000 |
| New York City Revenue, |
|
| 5,000,000 |
|
13,550,000 |
| State Energy Research & |
|
| 13,550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 40,830,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
48
|
Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
North Dakota—0.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
790,000 |
| Fargo Improvement General |
| $ | 790,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Ohio—3.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,235,000 |
| Fairfield Industrial Development |
|
| 2,235,000 |
|
20,000,000 |
| Geauga County Revenue, |
|
| 20,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 22,235,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oklahoma—2.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
8,800,000 |
| Development Finance Authority |
|
| 8,800,000 |
|
3,300,000 |
| Guymon Utilities Authority |
|
| 3,300,000 |
|
5,000,000 |
| Pittsburgh County Economic |
|
| 5,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 17,100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oregon—1.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,200,000 |
| State Economic Development |
|
| 2,200,000 |
|
300,000 |
| State Economic Development |
|
| 300,000 |
|
6,070,000 |
| State Economic Development |
|
| 6,070,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 8,570,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pennsylvania—6.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
9,915,000 |
| Delaware County Industrial |
|
| 9,915,000 |
|
3,295,000 |
| Fayette County Hospital Authority |
|
| 3,295,000 |
|
11,000,000 |
| Penn State Higher Education |
|
| 11,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Pennsylvania—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
5,695,000 |
| Philadelphia Gas Works Revenue, |
| $ | 5,695,000 |
|
10,225,000 |
| Washington County Industrial |
|
| 10,225,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 40,130,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
South Carolina—0.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
4,380,000 |
| State Jobs—Economic Development |
|
| 4,380,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
South Dakota—0.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,050,000 |
| Brookings Industrial Development |
|
| 1,050,000 |
|
1,450,000 |
| Economic Development Finance |
|
| 1,450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 2,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Tennessee—5.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,660,000 |
| Brownsville Industrial Development |
|
| 2,660,000 |
|
3,310,000 |
| Franklin County Industrial |
|
| 3,310,000 |
|
1,400,000 |
| Huntingdon Industrial Development |
|
| 1,400,000 |
|
15,000,000 |
| Lewisburg Industrial Development |
|
| 15,000,000 |
|
5,035,000 |
| Metropolitan Government Nashville |
|
| 5,035,000 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
49
|
Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Tennessee—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
3,415,000 |
| Metropolitan Government Nashville |
| $ | 3,415,000 |
|
6,355,000 |
| Shelby County Health Educational |
|
| 6,355,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 37,175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Texas—9.7% |
|
|
|
| ||
18,780,000 |
| Austin Hotel Occupancy Tax |
|
| 18,780,000 |
|
12,000,000 |
| Port Arthur Navigation District |
|
| 12,000,000 |
|
32,500,000 |
| Port Corpus Christi Authority |
|
| 32,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 63,280,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Vermont—5.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
12,800,000 |
| Housing Finance Agency—Series A |
|
| 12,800,000 |
|
22,000,000 |
| State Student Assistance Education |
|
| 22,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 34,800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Virginia—0.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,000,000 |
| Brunswick County Industrial |
|
| 1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Washington—3.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,745,000 |
| Economic Development Finance |
|
| 2,745,000 |
|
6,125,000 |
| Port Bellingham Industrial |
|
| 6,125,000 |
|
3,140,000 |
| Port Bellingham Industrial |
|
| 3,140,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Washington—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
11,500,000 |
| Seattle Housing Authority |
| $ | 11,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 23,510,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
West Virginia—0.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
4,000,000 |
| Economic Development Authority |
|
| 4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Wisconsin—0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
300,000 |
| Elkhorn Industrial Development |
|
| 300,000 |
|
1,750,000 |
| Franklin Industrial Development |
|
| 1,750,000 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Mequon Industrial Development |
|
| 1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,050,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Wyoming—1.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
8,000,000 |
| Sweetwater County Environment |
|
| 8,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Municipal Bonds |
|
| 578,079,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Money Market Funds—6.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
15,000,000 |
| BlackRock Liquidity Fund |
|
| 15,000,000 |
|
25,721,567 |
| SEI Tax Exempt Trust— |
|
| 25,721,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Money Market Funds |
|
| 40,721,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Investments |
|
| 618,800,990 |
|
|
| Other Assets in Excess of |
|
| 33,256,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| TOTAL NET ASSETS—100.0% |
| $ | 652,057,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
50
|
Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
Percentages are stated as a percent of net assets. |
|
(a) Variable Rate Security—The rate reported is the rate in effect as of April 30, 2009. The date shown is the next reset date. |
|
(b) Maturity date represents first available put date. |
|
CS—Credit Support |
|
LIQ—Liquidity Facility |
|
LOC—Letter of Credit |
|
SPA—Standby Purchase Agreement |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
51
|
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Municipal Bonds—98.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
Alabama—3.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,500,000 |
| Chatom Industrial Development |
| $ | 1,500,015 |
|
5,795,000 |
| Health Care Authority for Baptist— |
|
| 5,814,645 |
|
10,150,000 |
| Health Care Authority for Baptist, |
|
| 10,150,000 |
|
6,500,000 |
| Housing Finance Authority, |
|
| 6,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 23,964,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Arizona—1.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
8,500,000 |
| Cochise County Pollution Control |
|
| 8,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Arkansas—1.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
9,000,000 |
| Independence County Industrial |
|
| 9,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
California—5.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
14,985,000 |
| California State General Obligation— |
|
| 14,985,000 |
|
900,000 |
| Loma Linda Hospital Revenue, |
|
| 897,858 |
|
2,000,000 |
| Municipal Finance Authority Solid |
|
| 2,004,540 |
|
21,305,000 |
| Vernon Natural Gas Financing |
|
| 21,305,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 39,192,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Colorado—1.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
8,300,000 |
| City of Arvada Water Enterprise |
|
| 8,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Colorado—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
1,000,000 |
| Denver City & County Airport |
| $ | 1,017,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 9,317,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Connecticut—0.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
6,000,000 |
| State Development Authority |
|
| 6,055,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Florida—8.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
600,000 |
| Citizens Property Insurance Corp., |
|
| 607,692 |
|
3,950,000 |
| Citizens Property Insurance Corp., |
|
| 3,953,871 |
|
11,590,000 |
| Hillsborough County School |
|
| 11,590,000 |
|
25,000,000 |
| Jea Electrical Systems Revenue— |
|
| 25,000,000 |
|
8,500,000 |
| Kissimmee Utility Authority |
|
| 8,500,000 |
|
3,500,000 |
| Okeechobee County Solid Waste |
|
| 3,488,625 |
|
1,100,000 |
| St. Johns County Industrial |
|
| 1,100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 54,240,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Georgia—1.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,000,000 |
| Burke County Development |
|
| 2,059,760 |
|
4,110,000 |
| Cobb County Development |
|
| 4,110,000 |
|
400,000 |
| Douglas County Development |
|
| 400,000 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
52
|
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
|
| Value |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Georgia—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
2,660,000 |
| Manchester Development Authority |
| $ | 2,660,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 9,229,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Illinois—8.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
18,200,000 |
| Chicago Board of Education |
|
| 18,200,000 |
|
5,700,000 |
| Chicago Board of Education |
|
| 5,700,000 |
|
700,000 |
| Des Plaines Industrial Development |
|
| 700,000 |
|
4,710,000 |
| Educational Facilities Authority |
|
| 4,710,000 |
|
300,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
|
| 300,000 |
|
1,780,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
|
| 1,780,000 |
|
4,055,000 |
| Granite City Solid Waste Revenue, |
|
| 4,060,636 |
|
20,900,000 |
| Rockford Revenue, Wesley Willows |
|
| 20,900,000 |
|
4,375,000 |
| Springfield Airport Authority |
|
| 4,375,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 60,725,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Indiana—3.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,480,000 |
| Clay Community Schools |
|
| 1,486,852 |
|
14,395,000 |
| Indianapolis Local Public |
|
| 14,395,000 |
|
500,000 |
| Seymour Economic Development |
|
| 500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
|
| Value |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Indiana—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
10,000,000 |
| Valparaiso Economic Development |
| $ | 10,000,000 | �� |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 26,381,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Iowa—0.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,215,000 |
| Sergeant Bluff Industrial |
|
| 2,215,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Kentucky—2.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
800,000 |
| Bardstown Industrial Development |
|
| 800,000 |
|
905,000 |
| Florence Industrial Building |
|
| 912,801 |
|
2,510,000 |
| Fort Mitchell Industrial Building |
|
| 2,510,000 |
|
510,000 |
| Hancock County Industrial |
|
| 510,000 |
|
4,300,000 |
| Kenton County Industrial Building |
|
| 4,300,000 |
|
2,030,000 |
| Newport Industrial Building |
|
| 2,030,000 |
|
4,050,000 |
| Pulaski County Solid Waste |
|
| 4,050,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 15,112,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Louisiana—8.3% |
|
|
|
| ||
3,185,000 |
| Caddo-Bossier Parishes Port |
|
| 3,185,000 |
|
4,600,000 |
| Jefferson Parish Industrial |
|
| 4,600,000 |
|
1,600,000 |
| Local Government Environmental |
|
| 1,600,000 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
53
|
|
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund | |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Louisiana—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
2,315,000 |
| North Webster Parish Industrial |
| $ | 2,315,000 |
|
20,000,000 |
| Plaquemines Port Harbor & |
|
| 20,126,600 |
|
25,000,000 |
| West Baton Rouge Parish Industrial |
|
| 25,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 56,826,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Maine—0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,780,000 |
| Finance Authority Industrial |
|
| 4,780,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Massachusetts—1.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
600,000 |
| Municipal Wholesale Electric Co., |
|
| 602,496 |
|
575,000 |
| State Development Finance Agency, |
|
| 577,128 |
|
2,700,000 |
| State Health & Educational Facilities |
|
| 2,700,000 |
|
3,500,000 |
| State Health & Educational |
|
| 3,499,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 7,379,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Michigan—9.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000,000 |
| Detroit Revenue Anticipation Notes |
|
| 6,050,220 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Detroit Sewer Disposal Revenue— |
|
| 1,003,330 |
|
15,000,000 |
| Detroit Sewer Disposal Revenue— |
|
| 15,000,000 |
|
26,500,000 |
| Royal Oak Hospital Finance |
|
| 26,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Michigan—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
400,000 |
| State Strategic Fund Limited |
| $ | 400,000 |
|
300,000 |
| State Strategic Fund Limited |
|
| 300,000 |
|
590,000 |
| State Strategic Fund Limited |
|
| 590,000 |
|
600,000 |
| State Strategic Fund Limited |
|
| 600,000 |
|
900,000 |
| State Strategic Fund Limited |
|
| 900,000 |
|
800,000 |
| State Strategic Fund Limited |
|
| 800,000 |
|
1,000,000 |
| State Strategic Fund Limited |
|
| 1,000,000 |
|
2,200,000 |
| State Strategic Fund Limited |
|
| 2,213,068 |
|
300,000 |
| State Strategic Fund Limited |
|
| 300,000 |
|
400,000 |
| Sterling Heights Economic |
|
| 400,000 |
|
6,500,000 |
| Wayne County Airport Authority |
|
| 6,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 62,556,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Minnesota—0.5% |
|
|
|
|
| |
3,465,000 |
| Ramsey Industrial Development |
|
| 3,465,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
54
|
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
| ||||||
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Missouri—0.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
550,000 |
| Bi-State Development Agency of |
| $ | 556,232 |
|
|
|
| ||||
Montana—0.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,100,000 |
| Forsyth Pollution Control Revenue— |
|
| 1,100,000 |
|
|
|
| ||||
Multistate—0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
4,700,000 |
| Theop LLC |
|
| 3,525,000 |
|
|
|
| ||||
Nevada—2.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
12,000,000 |
| Clark County Airport Improvement |
|
| 12,000,000 |
|
1,500,000 |
| Clark County Passenger Facilities |
|
| 1,548,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 13,548,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New Hampshire—0.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,000,000 |
| State Business Finance Authority |
|
| 1,011,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New Jersey—0.5% |
|
|
|
| ||
230,000 |
| Health Care Facilities Finance |
|
| 218,546 |
|
2,000,000 |
| Newark Tax Appeal Notes—Series H |
|
| 2,033,440 |
|
955,000 |
| Tobacco Settlement Financing |
|
| 1,034,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 3,286,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New Mexico—0.2% |
|
|
|
|
| |
1,285,000 |
| Las Cruces Industrial Development |
|
| 1,285,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New York—6.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,000,000 |
| New York City Industrial |
|
| 2,034,880 |
|
2,000,000 |
| New York City Municipal Water |
|
| 2,000,000 |
|
25,850,000 |
| New York City Revenue, |
|
| 25,850,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
| ||||||
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
New York—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
590,000 |
| Seneca County Industrial |
| $ | 589,876 |
|
3,000,000 |
| State Energy Research & |
|
| 3,000,000 |
|
4,500,000 |
| State Environmental Facilities |
|
| 4,494,105 |
|
500,000 |
| Westchester Tobacco Asset |
|
| 361,990 |
|
9,000,000 |
| Yonkers Revenue Anticipation |
|
| 9,021,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 47,352,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
North Carolina—2.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
18,785,000 |
| Charlotte Airport Revenue, |
|
| 18,785,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Ohio—2.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
6,800,000 |
| Geauga County Revenue, South |
|
| 6,800,000 |
|
1,350,000 |
| Sandusky County Industrial |
|
| 1,350,000 |
|
3,090,000 |
| Sharonville Industrial Development |
|
| 3,090,000 |
|
5,000,000 |
| State Air Quality Development |
|
| 5,063,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 16,303,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oklahoma—0.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
600,000 |
| Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma |
|
| 573,996 |
|
5,000,000 |
| Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust |
|
| 5,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 5,573,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
55
|
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
| ||||||
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Oregon—0.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
400,000 |
| Gilliam County Solid Waste Disposal |
| $ | 400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pennsylvania—7.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
9,000,000 |
| Penn State Higher Education |
|
| 9,000,000 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Philadelphia Airport Revenue— |
|
| 1,002,470 |
|
16,000,000 |
| Philadelphia Water & Wastewater |
|
| 16,000,000 |
|
24,700,000 |
| Souderton Area School District |
|
| 24,700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 50,702,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Puerto Rico—0.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,745,000 |
| Electric Power Authority—Series S |
|
| 2,763,995 |
|
1,590,000 |
| Municipal Finance Agency—Series A |
|
| 1,595,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 4,359,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
South Carolina—1.6% |
|
|
|
| ||
5,885,000 |
| State Jobs Economic Development |
|
| 5,885,000 |
|
5,000,000 |
| York County Pollution Control |
|
| 5,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 10,885,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Tennessee—2.8% |
|
|
|
| ||
14,915,000 |
| Memphis—Shelby County Airport |
|
| 14,941,549 |
|
4,365,000 |
| Metropolitan Government |
|
| 4,365,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 19,306,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
| ||||||
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Texas—5.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,260,000 |
| Austin Hotel Occupancy Tax |
| $ | 6,260,000 |
|
2,100,000 |
| Dallam County Industrial |
|
| 2,100,000 |
|
2,600,000 |
| Dallam County Industrial |
|
| 2,600,000 |
|
6,000,000 |
| Gulf Coast Industrial Development |
|
| 6,000,000 |
|
1,825,000 |
| Harris County Health Facilities |
|
| 1,827,628 |
|
2,000,000 |
| Houston Airport Systems Revenue, |
|
| 2,000,200 |
|
2,500,000 |
| Montgomery County Unlimited |
|
| 2,504,700 |
|
2,000,000 |
| Municipal Gas Acquisition & |
|
| 1,915,940 |
|
2,500,000 |
| North Tollway Authority Revenue— |
|
| 2,558,475 |
|
2,035,000 |
| Port of Houston Authority |
|
| 2,044,198 |
|
1,000,000 |
| Sabine River Industrial |
|
| 1,000,160 |
|
5,000,000 |
| State Transportation Commission, |
|
| 5,019,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 35,830,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Utah—1.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,500,000 |
| Associated Municipal Power |
|
| 2,507,000 |
|
4,000,000 |
| Transit Authority Sales Tax |
|
| 4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 6,507,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
56
|
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund |
Schedule of Portfolio Investments—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
| ||||||
Municipal Bonds—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
Vermont—1.1% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,535,000 |
| Housing Finance Agency, Single |
| $ | 1,535,000 |
|
6,275,000 |
| Housing Finance Agency, Single |
|
| 6,275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 7,810,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Washington—0.2% |
|
|
|
| ||
1,110,000 |
| Economic Development Finance |
|
| 1,110,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
West Virginia—0.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
3,000,000 |
| Economic Development Authority |
|
| 3,003,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Wisconsin—2.9% |
|
|
|
| ||
16,000,000 |
| Ladysmith Solid Waste Disposal |
|
| 16,000,000 |
|
1,175,000 |
| Rhinelander Industrial Development |
|
| 1,175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
| Security |
| Value |
| |
|
|
| ||||
| ||||||
Wisconsin—continued |
|
|
|
| ||
2,585,000 |
| State Health & Educational Facilities |
| $ | 2,585,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 19,760,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Wyoming—0.4% |
|
|
|
| ||
2,855,000 |
| Gillette Environmental |
|
| 2,855,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Municipal Bonds |
|
| 673,799,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Money Market Funds—0.0% |
|
|
|
| ||
62,018 |
| SEI Tax Exempt Trust— |
|
| 62,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Money Market Funds |
|
| 62,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Total Investments |
|
| 673,861,832 |
|
|
| Other Assets in Excess of |
|
| 7,337,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| TOTAL NET ASSETS—100.0% |
| $ | 681,199,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages are stated as a percent of net assets. | |
|
|
(a) | Variable Rate Security—The rate reported is the rate in effect as of April 30, 2009. The date shown is the next reset date. |
|
|
(b) | Maturity date represents first available put date. |
|
|
(c) | Put Bond |
|
|
(d) | Auction Rate Note |
|
|
(e) | Security fair valued in accordance with procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. These securities comprised 0.5% of the Fund’s net assets. |
|
|
(f) | Restricted under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. These securities have been determined to be liquid under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees. Liquid securities restricted under Rule 144A comprised 0.1% of the Fund’s net assets. |
|
|
(g) | Restricted under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. These securities have been determined to be illiquid under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees. Illiquid securities restricted under Rule 144A comprised 0.5% of the Fund’s net assets. |
|
CS—Credit Support |
|
LIQ—Liquidity Facility |
|
LOC—Letter of Credit |
|
SPA—Standby Purchase Agreement |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
57
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| |||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments, at value (1) |
| $ | 49,887,911 |
| $ | 505,202,686 |
| $ | 5,613,413 |
|
Cash |
|
| — |
|
| 887,102 |
|
| — |
|
Receivable for capital shares issued |
|
| 260 |
|
| 645,958 |
|
| 5,000 |
|
Receivable for investment securities sold |
|
| 626,184 |
|
| 93,063,691 |
|
| 289,205 |
|
Receivable for forwards currency contracts |
|
| — |
|
| 43,546,192 |
|
| — |
|
Receivable for swap contracts |
|
| — |
|
| 215,765 |
|
| — |
|
Due from Adviser |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 2,567 |
|
Dividends and interest receivable |
|
| 180,314 |
|
| 12,489,676 |
|
| 3,409 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
| 14,844 |
|
| 26,017 |
|
| 23,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total assets |
|
| 50,709,513 |
|
| 656,077,087 |
|
| 5,936,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written option contracts, at value (2) |
|
| 345,060 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Payable for capital shares redeemed |
|
| — |
|
| 854,065 |
|
| 1,673 |
|
Payable for investment securities purchased |
|
| — |
|
| 120,101,582 |
|
| 250,000 |
|
Payable for forward currency contracts |
|
| — |
|
| 44,008,686 |
|
| — |
|
Payable for swap contracts |
|
| — |
|
| 191,321 |
|
| — |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees |
|
| 39,808 |
|
| 400,176 |
|
| — |
|
Line of credit |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Other |
|
| 30,200 |
|
| 362,144 |
|
| 17,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total liabilities |
|
| 415,068 |
|
| 165,917,974 |
|
| 269,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net Assets |
| $ | 50,294,445 |
| $ | 490,159,113 |
| $ | 5,667,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets represented by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock |
| $ | 67,096,843 |
| $ | 1,466,852,922 |
| $ | 13,049,478 |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income |
|
| 4,208 |
|
| 21,297,889 |
|
| 22,593 |
|
Accumulated net realized gains (losses) on investments, written option contracts expired or closed, foreign currency translation, and swap contracts |
|
| 450,814 |
|
| (938,684,972 | ) |
| (950,798 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| (17,077,202 | ) |
| (58,985,994 | ) |
| (6,453,100 | ) |
Written option contracts |
|
| (180,218 | ) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
| — |
|
| 117,318 |
|
| (631 | ) |
Forward currency contracts |
|
| — |
|
| (462,494 | ) |
| — |
|
Swap contracts |
|
| — |
|
| 24,444 |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total Net Assets |
| $ | 50,294,445 |
| $ | 490,159,113 |
| $ | 5,667,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
| $ | 50,294,445 |
| $ | 490,159,113 |
| $ | 5,667,542 |
|
Shares of beneficial interest issued and outstanding |
|
| 6,255,912 |
|
| 108,630,681 |
|
| 1,088,698 |
|
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per share |
| $ | 8.04 |
| $ | 4.51 |
| $ | 5.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
(1) Cost of investments |
| $ | 66,965,113 |
| $ | 564,188,680 |
| $ | 12,066,513 |
|
(2) Premiums received |
| $ | 164,842 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
58
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Accelerating |
| |||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments, at value (1) |
| $ | 10,020,134 |
| $ | 2,492,157 |
| $ | 1,036,177 |
|
Receivable for capital shares issued |
|
| 3,027 |
|
| — |
|
| 2,500 |
|
Receivable for investment securities sold |
|
| 325,524 |
|
| 140,021 |
|
| 13,722 |
|
Due from Adviser |
|
| — |
|
| 10,177 |
|
| 17,004 |
|
Dividends and interest receivable |
|
| 5,668 |
|
| 1,453 |
|
| 2,208 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
| 6,750 |
|
| 11,690 |
|
| 9,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total assets |
|
| 10,361,103 |
|
| 2,655,498 |
|
| 1,080,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable for investment securities purchased |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 70,347 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees |
|
| 7,995 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Line of credit |
|
| 1,703,000 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Other |
|
| 23,930 |
|
| 13,535 |
|
| 7,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total liabilities |
|
| 1,734,925 |
|
| 13,535 |
|
| 77,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net Assets |
| $ | 8,626,178 |
| $ | 2,641,963 |
| $ | 1,003,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets represented by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock |
| $ | 27,761,150 |
| $ | 4,564,824 |
| $ | 1,017,111 |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income (loss) |
|
| (40,457 | ) |
| 4,202 |
|
| 1,863 |
|
Accumulated net realized gains (losses) on investments and foreign currency translation |
|
| (10,285,647 | ) |
| (744,020 | ) |
| 6,643 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| (8,808,868 | ) |
| (1,183,043 | ) |
| (22,453 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total Net Assets |
| $ | 8,626,178 |
| $ | 2,641,963 |
| $ | 1,003,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
| $ | 8,626,178 |
| $ | 2,641,963 |
| $ | 1,003,164 |
|
Shares of beneficial interest issued and outstanding |
|
| 1,512,206 |
|
| 451,841 |
|
| 101,751 |
|
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per share |
| $ | 5.70 |
| $ | 5.85 |
| $ | 9.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
(1) Cost of investments |
| $ | 18,829,002 |
| $ | 3,675,200 |
| $ | 1,058,630 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
59
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Municipal |
| Ultra Short |
| ||
|
|
|
| ||||
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments, at value (1) |
| $ | 618,800,990 |
| $ | 673,861,832 |
|
Receivable for capital shares issued |
|
| 11,997,036 |
|
| 7,913,212 |
|
Receivable for investment securities sold |
|
| 20,433,000 |
|
| — |
|
Interest receivable |
|
| 2,205,488 |
|
| 5,161,580 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
| 146,481 |
|
| 52,399 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total assets |
|
| 653,582,995 |
|
| 686,989,023 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable for capital shares redeemed |
|
| 1,106,778 |
|
| 1,080,951 |
|
Payable for investment securities purchased |
|
| — |
|
| 3,900,000 |
|
Payable to custodian |
|
| 114,314 |
|
| 476,003 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees |
|
| 236,391 |
|
| 268,138 |
|
Distribution fees |
|
| — |
|
| 8,797 |
|
Other |
|
| 68,111 |
|
| 55,691 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total liabilities |
|
| 1,525,594 |
|
| 5,789,580 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Assets |
| $ | 652,057,401 |
| $ | 681,199,443 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets represented by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock |
| $ | 652,057,401 |
| $ | 681,916,601 |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income |
|
| — |
|
| 68,993 |
|
Accumulated net realized losses on investments sold |
|
| — |
|
| (54,595 | ) |
Net unrealized depreciation on investments |
|
| — |
|
| (731,556 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Total Net Assets |
| $ | 652,057,401 |
| $ | 681,199,443 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adviser Class Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
|
|
|
| $ | 46,597,799 |
|
Shares of beneficial interest issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
| 4,625,724 |
|
Net asset value and redemption price per share |
|
|
|
| $ | 10.07 |
|
Maximum offering price per share (net asset value plus sales charge of 0.50%) |
|
|
|
| $ | 10.12 |
|
Investor Class Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
| $ | 652,057,401 |
| $ | 634,601,644 |
|
Shares of beneficial interest issued and outstanding |
|
| 652,057,289 |
|
| 63,349,522 |
|
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per share |
| $ | 1.00 |
| $ | 10.02 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(1) Cost of investments |
| $ | 618,800,990 |
| $ | 674,593,388 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
60
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Statements of Operations
For the six months ended April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| |||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
| $ | 325,735 |
| $ | 26,892 |
| $ | 5 |
|
Dividend income* |
|
| 564,971 |
|
| 92,778,643 |
|
| 82,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total investment income |
|
| 890,706 |
|
| 92,805,535 |
|
| 82,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees |
|
| 241,283 |
|
| 2,516,376 |
|
| 25,537 |
|
Administration fees |
|
| 11,207 |
|
| 92,952 |
|
| 1,206 |
|
Fund accounting fees |
|
| 7,228 |
|
| 59,946 |
|
| 773 |
|
Audit and tax fees |
|
| 9,855 |
|
| 9,270 |
|
| 10,650 |
|
Custodian fees |
|
| 2,478 |
|
| 19,830 |
|
| 280 |
|
Legal fees |
|
| 3,029 |
|
| 22,260 |
|
| 1,237 |
|
Registration and filing fees |
|
| 10,736 |
|
| 21,537 |
|
| 9,797 |
|
Printing and mailing fees |
|
| 2,723 |
|
| 135,579 |
|
| 3,303 |
|
Transfer agent fees |
|
| 11,204 |
|
| 92,950 |
|
| 1,204 |
|
Trustee fees |
|
| 415 |
|
| 3,732 |
|
| 54 |
|
Interest expense |
|
| 1,804 |
|
| 15,507 |
|
| 1,783 |
|
Other fees |
|
| 1,707 |
|
| 15,118 |
|
| 191 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total expenses before expense waiver by Adviser |
|
| 303,669 |
|
| 3,005,057 |
|
| 56,015 |
|
Expense waiver by Adviser (Note 6) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (19,735 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net expenses |
|
| 303,669 |
|
| 3,005,057 |
|
| 36,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net investment income |
|
| 587,037 |
|
| 89,800,478 |
|
| 46,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| 773,690 |
|
| (332,593,773 | ) |
| (684,072 | ) |
Written option contracts expired or closed |
|
| 85,200 |
|
| 672,620 |
|
| — |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
| — |
|
| (3,562,095 | ) |
| 667 |
|
Swap contracts |
|
| — |
|
| 2,239,675 |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) |
|
| 858,890 |
|
| (333,243,573 | ) |
| (683,405 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| (1,473,764 | ) |
| 183,624,106 |
|
| 63,077 |
|
Written option contracts |
|
| (180,218 | ) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
| — |
|
| 327,012 |
|
| (22 | ) |
Forward currency contracts |
|
| — |
|
| (462,494 | ) |
| — |
|
Swap contracts |
|
| — |
|
| 24,444 |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
|
| (1,653,982 | ) |
| 183,513,068 |
|
| 63,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net realized and unrealized loss on investments |
|
| (795,092 | ) |
| (149,730,505 | ) |
| (620,350 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations |
| $ | (208,055 | ) | $ | (59,930,027 | ) | $ | (574,293 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Net of foreign taxes withheld |
| $ | — |
| $ | 4,955,590 |
| $ | 1,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
61
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Statements of Operations—Continued
For the six months ended April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Accelerating |
| |||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
| $ | — |
| $ | 305 |
| $ | 682 |
|
Dividend income* |
|
| 30,752 |
|
| 21,621 |
|
| 7,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total investment income |
|
| 30,752 |
|
| 21,926 |
|
| 8,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees |
|
| 45,959 |
|
| 11,280 |
|
| 4,769 |
|
Administration fees |
|
| 1,976 |
|
| 470 |
|
| 207 |
|
Fund accounting fees |
|
| 1,275 |
|
| 308 |
|
| 136 |
|
Audit and tax fees |
|
| 9,720 |
|
| 9,440 |
|
| 12,369 |
|
Custodian fees |
|
| 440 |
|
| 103 |
|
| 48 |
|
Legal fees |
|
| 1,104 |
|
| 658 |
|
| 7,274 |
|
Registration and filing fees |
|
| 11,619 |
|
| 9,225 |
|
| 2,923 |
|
Printing and mailing fees |
|
| 6,554 |
|
| 200 |
|
| 198 |
|
Transfer agent fees |
|
| 1,977 |
|
| 476 |
|
| 210 |
|
Trustee fees |
|
| 81 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 6 |
|
Interest expense |
|
| 9,140 |
|
| 86 |
|
| — |
|
Other fees |
|
| 317 |
|
| 67 |
|
| 71 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total expenses before expense waiver by Adviser |
|
| 90,162 |
|
| 32,327 |
|
| 28,211 |
|
Expense waiver by Adviser (Note 6) |
|
| (18,953 | ) |
| (17,014 | ) |
| (21,773 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net expenses |
|
| 71,209 |
|
| 15,313 |
|
| 6,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
|
| (40,457 | ) |
| 6,613 |
|
| 1,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| (3,767,607 | ) |
| (603,776 | ) |
| 6,643 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
| 85 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) |
|
| (3,767,522 | ) |
| (603,776 | ) |
| 6,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| 1,622,777 |
|
| 627,390 |
|
| (22,453 | ) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
| (49 | ) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
|
| 1,622,728 |
|
| 627,390 |
|
| (22,453 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net realized and unrealized income (loss) on investments |
|
| (2,144,794 | ) |
| 23,614 |
|
| (15,810 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations |
| $ | (2,185,251 | ) | $ | 30,227 |
| $ | (13,947 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Net of foreign taxes withheld |
| $ | 152 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Fund commenced operations on November 5, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
62
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Statements of Operations—Continued
For the six months ended April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Municipal |
| Ultra Short |
| ||
|
|
|
| ||||
INVESTMENT INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
| $ | 5,959,253 |
| $ | 9,141,291 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total investment income |
|
| 5,959,253 |
|
| 9,141,291 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees |
|
| 1,449,929 |
|
| 1,575,394 |
|
Administration fees |
|
| 9,786 |
|
| 6,312 |
|
Distribution fees - Adviser Class |
|
| — |
|
| 28,507 |
|
Fund accounting fees |
|
| 8,155 |
|
| 5,261 |
|
Audit and tax fees |
|
| 8,028 |
|
| 8,524 |
|
Custodian fees |
|
| 4,893 |
|
| 3,161 |
|
Legal fees |
|
| 44,138 |
|
| 4,076 |
|
Registration and filing fees |
|
| 48,241 |
|
| 47,675 |
|
Printing and mailing fees |
|
| 10,463 |
|
| 17,855 |
|
Transfer agent fees |
|
| 9,786 |
|
| 6,311 |
|
Trustee fees |
|
| 5,591 |
|
| 2,155 |
|
Other fees |
|
| 160,633 |
|
| 5,831 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total expenses before expense waiver by Adviser |
|
| 1,759,643 |
|
| 1,711,062 |
|
Expense waiver by Adviser (Note 6) |
|
| (9,413 | ) |
| (422,241 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Net expenses |
|
| 1,750,230 |
|
| 1,288,821 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net investment income |
|
| 4,209,023 |
|
| 7,852,470 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN ON INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain on investments |
|
| — |
|
| 94 |
|
Change in unrealized appreciation on investments |
|
| — |
|
| 228,450 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments |
|
| — |
|
| 228,544 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations |
| $ | 4,209,023 |
| $ | 8,081,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
63
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Statement of Cash Flows
For the six months ended April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic |
| |
|
|
| ||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
Change in net assets resulting from operations |
| $ | (2,185,251 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments |
|
| (1,163,526 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of investments |
|
| 5,058,948 |
|
Decrease in dividends and interest receivable |
|
| 2,517 |
|
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
| 17,674 |
|
Decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
| (5,154 | ) |
Net realized loss on investments |
|
| 3,767,607 |
|
Unrealized appreciation on investments |
|
| (1,622,777 | ) |
|
|
| ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
| 3,870,038 |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in line of credit |
|
| (2,296,000 | ) |
Proceeds from shares sold |
|
| 3,888,567 |
|
Payment on shares redeemed |
|
| (5,462,605 | ) |
|
|
| ||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
| (3,870,038 | ) |
|
|
| ||
Net change in cash |
| $ | — |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
CASH: |
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance |
|
| — |
|
|
|
| ||
Ending Balance |
| $ | — |
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
During the six months ended April 30, 2009, the Dynamic Innovators Fund paid cash of $19,085 in interest.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
64
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic Balance Fund |
| ||||
|
|
| |||||
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| ||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
| $ | 587,037 |
| $ | 1,768,731 |
|
Net realized gain (loss) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| 773,690 |
|
| (1,238,791 | ) |
Written option contracts expired or closed |
|
| 85,200 |
|
| 695,713 |
|
Change in unrealized depreciation on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| (1,473,764 | ) |
| (29,296,828 | ) |
Written option contracts |
|
| (180,218 | ) |
| — |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations |
|
| (208,055 | ) |
| (28,071,175 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
| (556,117 | ) |
| (1,629,117 | ) |
From net realized gain on investments |
|
| — |
|
| (6,116,765 | ) |
From tax return on capital |
|
| — |
|
| (102,670 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders |
|
| (556,117 | ) |
| (7,848,552 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares sold |
|
| 170,968 |
|
| 579,192 |
|
Dividends reinvested |
|
| 530,530 |
|
| 7,231,038 |
|
Redemption fees |
|
| 10 |
|
| 1,353 |
|
Cost of shares redeemed |
|
| (2,740,354 | ) |
| (11,154,144 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets from capital share transactions |
|
| (2,038,846 | ) |
| (3,342,561 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Total change in net assets |
|
| (2,803,018 | ) |
| (39,262,288 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
NET ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
| 53,097,463 |
|
| 92,359,751 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
End of period* |
| $ | 50,294,445 |
| $ | 53,097,463 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Including accumulated undistributed net investment income (loss) of: |
| $ | 4,208 |
| $ | (26,712 | ) |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
65
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
|
Statements of Changes in Net Assets—Continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic Dividend Fund |
| ||||
|
|
| |||||
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| ||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
| $ | 89,800,478 |
| $ | 184,237,212 |
|
Net realized gain (loss) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| (332,593,773 | ) |
| (544,541,420 | ) |
Written option contracts expired or closed |
|
| 672,620 |
|
| — |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
| (3,562,095 | ) |
| (11,931,318 | ) |
Forward currency contracts |
|
| — |
|
| (11,434,127 | ) |
Swap contracts |
|
| 2,239,675 |
|
| 20,730 |
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| 183,624,106 |
|
| (322,575,911 | ) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
| 327,012 |
|
| (604,332 | ) |
Forward currency contracts |
|
| (462,494 | ) |
| — |
|
Swap contracts |
|
| 24,444 |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations |
|
| (59,930,027 | ) |
| (706,829,166 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
| (68,502,589 | ) |
| (188,534,882 | ) |
From tax return on capital |
|
| — |
|
| (5,952,906 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders |
|
| (68,502,589 | ) |
| (194,487,788 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares sold |
|
| 89,312,985 |
|
| 563,036,031 |
|
Dividends reinvested |
|
| 47,210,626 |
|
| 139,704,564 |
|
Redemption fees |
|
| 96,854 |
|
| 517,263 |
|
Cost of shares redeemed |
|
| (116,787,282 | ) |
| (703,254,544 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets from capital share transactions |
|
| 19,833,183 |
|
| 3,314 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total change in net assets |
|
| (108,599,433 | ) |
| (901,313,640 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
NET ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
| 598,758,546 |
|
| 1,500,072,186 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
End of period* |
| $ | 490,159,113 |
| $ | 598,758,546 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Including accumulated undistributed net investment income of: |
| $ | 21,297,889 |
| $ | — |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
66
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
|
Statements of Changes in Net Assets—Continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic Financial Services Fund |
| ||||
|
|
| |||||
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| ||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
| $ | 46,057 |
| $ | 130,723 |
|
Net realized gain (loss) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| (684,072 | ) |
| 310,493 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
| 667 |
|
| (51,301 | ) |
Swap contracts |
|
| — |
|
| 929 |
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| 63,077 |
|
| (5,081,969 | ) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
| (22 | ) |
| (65,035 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations |
|
| (574,293 | ) |
| (4,756,160 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
| (103,511 | ) |
| — |
|
From net realized gain on investments |
|
| (419,999 | ) |
| (2,663,086 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders |
|
| (523,510 | ) |
| (2,663,086 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares sold |
|
| 776,164 |
|
| 6,472,426 |
|
Dividends reinvested |
|
| 473,302 |
|
| 2,103,627 |
|
Redemption fees |
|
| 182 |
|
| 10,070 |
|
Cost of shares redeemed |
|
| (1,160,814 | ) |
| (5,310,381 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets from capital share transactions |
|
| 88,834 |
|
| 3,275,742 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total change in net assets |
|
| (1,008,969 | ) |
| (4,143,504 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
NET ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
| 6,676,511 |
|
| 10,820,015 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
End of period* |
| $ | 5,667,542 |
| $ | 6,676,511 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Including accumulated undistributed net investment income of: |
| $ | 22,593 |
| $ | 80,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
67
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
|
Statements of Changes in Net Assets—Continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic Innovators Fund |
| ||||
|
|
| |||||
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| ||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment loss |
| $ | (40,457 | ) | $ | (74,231 | ) |
Net realized gain (loss) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| (3,767,607 | ) |
| (6,519,886 | ) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
| 85 |
|
| (65,509 | ) |
Swap contracts |
|
| — |
|
| 113 |
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
| 1,622,777 |
|
| (13,405,862 | ) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
| (49 | ) |
| 49 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations |
|
| (2,185,251 | ) |
| (20,065,326 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
| — |
|
| (99,263 | ) |
From net realized gain on investments |
|
| — |
|
| (1,905,602 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders |
|
| — |
|
| (2,004,865 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares sold |
|
| 891,494 |
|
| 45,945,955 |
|
Dividends reinvested |
|
| — |
|
| 1,654,158 |
|
Redemption fees |
|
| 973 |
|
| 117,477 |
|
Cost of shares redeemed |
|
| (5,463,578 | ) |
| (58,619,588 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets from capital share transactions |
|
| (4,571,111 | ) |
| (10,901,998 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Total change in net assets |
|
| (6,756,362 | ) |
| (32,972,189 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
| 15,382,540 |
|
| 48,354,729 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
End of period* |
| $ | 8,626,178 |
| $ | 15,382,540 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Including accumulated undistributed net investment loss of: |
| $ | (40,457 | ) | $ | — |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
68
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
|
Statements of Changes in Net Assets—Continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic Transformations Fund |
| ||||
|
|
| |||||
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| ||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
| $ | 6,613 |
| $ | 14,717 |
|
Net realized loss on investments |
|
| (603,776 | ) |
| (140,244 | ) |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
|
| 627,390 |
|
| (1,810,433 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations |
|
| 30,227 |
|
| (1,935,960 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
| (17,128 | ) |
| — |
|
From net realized gain on investments |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders |
|
| (17,128 | ) |
| — |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares sold |
|
| 8,150 |
|
| 4,630,875 |
|
Dividends reinvested |
|
| 17,115 |
|
| — |
|
Redemption fees |
|
| 1 |
|
| 22 |
|
Cost of shares redeemed |
|
| (45,900 | ) |
| (45,439 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets from capital share transactions |
|
| (20,634 | ) |
| 4,585,458 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total change in net assets |
|
| (7,535 | ) |
| 2,649,498 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
| 2,649,498 |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
End of period* |
| $ | 2,641,963 |
| $ | 2,649,498 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Including accumulated undistributed net investment income of: |
| $ | 4,202 |
| $ | 14,717 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Fund commenced operations on December 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
69
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
|
Statements of Changes in Net Assets—Continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accelerating Dividend Fund |
| |||
|
| ||||
| Period Ended |
| |||
|
| ||||
| (Unaudited) |
| |||
OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
| $ | 1,863 |
|
|
Net realized income on investments |
|
| 6,643 |
|
|
Change in unrealized depreciation on investments |
|
| (22,453 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Change in net assets resulting from operations |
|
| (13,947 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
| — |
|
|
From net realized gain on investments |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares sold |
|
| 1,017,111 |
|
|
Dividends reinvested |
|
| — |
|
|
Redemption fees |
|
| — |
|
|
Cost of shares redeemed |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Change in net assets from capital share transactions |
|
| 1,017,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total change in net assets |
|
| 1,003,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
End of period* |
| $ | 1,003,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Including accumulated undistributed net investment income of: |
| $ | 1,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Fund commenced operations on November 5, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
70
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
|
Statements of Changes in Net Assets—Continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Municipal Money Market Fund |
| ||||
|
|
| |||||
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| ||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
| $ | 4,209,023 |
| $ | 22,134,818 |
|
Net realized gain on investments |
|
| — |
|
| 10,588 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations |
|
| 4,209,023 |
|
| 22,145,406 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to Adviser Class Shareholders (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
| — |
|
| (1,159 | ) |
Distributions to Investor Class Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
| (4,209,023 | ) |
| (22,133,659 | ) |
From net realized gain on investments |
|
| — |
|
| (10,588 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders |
|
| (4,209,023 | ) |
| (22,145,406 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares sold |
|
| 467,227,986 |
|
| 5,315,613,045 |
|
Dividends reinvested |
|
| 3,472,957 |
|
| 18,013,012 |
|
Cost of shares redeemed |
|
| (483,044,076 | ) |
| (5,784,755,674 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets from capital share transactions |
|
| (12,343,133 | ) |
| (451,129,617 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Total change in net assets |
|
| (12,343,133 | ) |
| (451,129,617 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
| 664,400,534 |
|
| 1,115,530,151 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
End of period |
| $ | 652,057,401 |
| $ | 664,400,534 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The Municipal Money Market Fund - Adviser Class ceased operations on December 5, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
71
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
|
Statements of Changes in Net Assets—Continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ultra Short |
| ||||
|
|
| |||||
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| ||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
| $ | 7,852,470 |
| $ | 6,238,586 |
|
Net realized gain on investments |
|
| 94 |
|
| 2,783 |
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
|
| 228,450 |
|
| (1,051,084 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations |
|
| 8,081,014 |
|
| 5,190,285 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to Adviser Class Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
| (419,354 | ) |
| (222,769 | ) |
Distributions to Investor Class Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
| (7,386,243 | ) |
| (6,001,676 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders |
|
| (7,805,597 | ) |
| (6,224,445 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares sold |
|
| 529,142,932 |
|
| 265,275,500 |
|
Dividends reinvested |
|
| 6,342,631 |
|
| 5,659,596 |
|
Redemption fees |
|
| 21,728 |
|
| 16,542 |
|
Cost of shares redeemed |
|
| (97,830,320 | ) |
| (86,950,657 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in net assets from capital share transactions |
|
| 437,676,971 |
|
| 184,000,981 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total change in net assets |
|
| 437,952,388 |
|
| 182,966,821 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
| 243,247,055 |
|
| 60,280,234 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
End of period* |
| $ | 681,199,443 |
| $ | 243,247,055 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Including accumulated undistributed net investment income of: |
| $ | 68,993 |
| $ | 22,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
72
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Financial Highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Dynamic Balance Fund |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| Six Months |
| Year Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Per Share Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net asset value per share, beginning of period |
|
| $ | 8.15 |
|
| $ | 13.55 |
| $ | 13.72 |
| $ | 12.67 |
| $ | 12.44 |
| $ | 11.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Income from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
| 0.09 |
|
|
| 0.26 |
|
| 0.26 |
|
| 0.21 |
|
| 0.19 |
|
| 0.19 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
| (0.11 | ) |
|
| (4.47 | ) |
| 0.28 |
|
| 1.26 |
|
| 0.85 |
|
| 1.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
|
| (0.02 | ) |
|
| (4.21 | ) |
| 0.54 |
|
| 1.47 |
|
| 1.04 |
|
| 1.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Redemption fees |
|
|
| 0.00 | (a) |
|
| 0.00 | (a) |
| 0.00 | (a) |
| 0.00 | (a) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
Less Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
|
| (0.09 | ) |
|
| (0.25 | ) |
| (0.24 | ) |
| (0.20 | ) |
| (0.19 | ) |
| (0.20 | ) |
From net realized gains on investments |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| (0.93 | ) |
| (0.47 | ) |
| (0.22 | ) |
| (0.62 | ) |
| — |
|
From tax return on capital |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| (0.01 | ) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total distributions |
|
|
| (0.09 | ) |
|
| (1.19 | ) |
| (0.71 | ) |
| (0.42 | ) |
| (0.81 | ) |
| (0.20 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Net asset value per share, end of period |
|
| $ | 8.04 |
|
| $ | 8.15 |
| $ | 13.55 |
| $ | 13.72 |
| $ | 12.67 |
| $ | 12.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total return |
|
|
| –0.22 | %(b) |
|
| –33.63 | % |
| 4.03 | % |
| 11.79 | % |
| 8.46 | % |
| 14.19 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets at end of period (000) |
|
| $ | 50,294 |
|
| $ | 53,097 |
| $ | 92,360 |
| $ | 98,162 |
| $ | 97,471 |
| $ | 70,705 |
|
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.26 | %(c) |
|
| 1.24 | % |
| 1.16 | % |
| 1.19 | % |
| 1.21 | % |
| 1.27 | % |
After waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.26 | %(c) |
|
| 1.24 | % |
| 1.16 | % |
| 1.19 | % |
| 1.31 | % |
| 1.35 | % |
Ratio of interest expense to average net assets |
|
|
| 0.01 | %(c) |
|
| 0.90 | % |
| 0.00 | %(a) |
| 0.00 | % |
| 0.00 | %(a) |
| 0.00 | %(a) |
Ratio of expenses to average net asset excluding interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.25 | %(c) |
|
| 1.15 | % |
| 1.16 | % |
| 1.19 | % |
| 1.21 | % |
| 1.27 | % |
After waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.25 | %(c) |
|
| 1.15 | % |
| 1.16 | % |
| 1.19 | % |
| 1.31 | % |
| 1.35 | % |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets |
|
|
| 2.43 | %(c) |
|
| 2.35 | % |
| 1.87 | % |
| 1.60 | % |
| 1.60 | % |
| 1.78 | % |
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
| 20 | % |
|
| 34 | % |
| 28 | % |
| 22 | % |
| 36 | % |
| 56 | % |
|
|
(a) | The amount is less than $0.005 per share or 0.005%. |
|
|
(b) | Not annualized. |
|
|
(c) | Annualized. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
73
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Financial Highlights—Continued
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Dynamic Dividend Fund |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| Six Months |
| Year Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Per Share Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net asset value per share, beginning of period |
|
| $ | 5.72 |
|
| $ | 13.32 |
| $ | 12.52 |
| $ | 11.98 |
| $ | 12.34 |
| $ | 10.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Income from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
| 0.85 |
|
|
| 1.33 |
|
| 1.95 |
|
| 1.61 |
|
| 1.57 |
|
| 1.09 | (a) |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
| (1.41 | ) |
|
| (7.29 | ) |
| 0.61 |
|
| 0.51 |
|
| (0.14 | ) |
| 1.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
|
| (0.56 | ) |
|
| (5.96 | ) |
| 2.56 |
|
| 2.12 |
|
| 1.43 |
|
| 2.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Redemption fees |
|
|
| 0.00 | (b) |
|
| 0.00 | (b) |
| 0.00 | (b) |
| 0.00 | (b) |
| 0.00 | (b) |
| 0.00 | (b) |
Less Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
|
| (0.65 | ) |
|
| (1.58 | ) |
| (1.76 | ) |
| (1.58 | ) |
| (1.51 | ) |
| (0.95 | ) |
From net realized gains on investments |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (0.28 | ) |
| — |
|
From tax return on capital |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| (0.06 | ) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total distributions |
|
|
| (0.65 | ) |
|
| (1.64 | ) |
| (1.76 | ) |
| (1.58 | ) |
| (1.79 | ) |
| (0.95 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Net asset value per share, end of period |
|
| $ | 4.51 |
|
| $ | 5.72 |
| $ | 13.32 |
| $ | 12.52 |
| $ | 11.98 |
| $ | 12.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total return |
|
|
| –9.66 | %(c) |
|
| –49.05 | % |
| 21.66 | % |
| 18.68 | % |
| 11.85 | % |
| 24.90 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets at end of period (000) |
|
| $ | 490,159 |
|
| $ | 598,759 |
| $ | 1,500,072 |
| $ | 633,264 |
| $ | 311,335 |
| $ | 43,530 |
|
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.19 | %(d) |
|
| 1.18 | % |
| 1.15 | % |
| 1.18 | % |
| 1.20 | % |
| 1.56 | % |
After waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.19 | %(d) |
|
| 1.18 | % |
| 1.15 | % |
| 1.18 | % |
| 1.23 | % |
| 1.35 | % |
Ratio of interest expense to average net assets |
|
|
| 0.01 | %(d) |
|
| 0.02 | % |
| 0.00 | %(b) |
| 0.00 | %(b) |
| 0.00 | % |
| 0.00 | % |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets excluding interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.18 | %(d) |
|
| 1.16 | % |
| 1.15 | % |
| 1.18 | % |
| 1.20 | % |
| 1.56 | % |
After waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.18 | %(d) |
|
| 1.16 | % |
| 1.15 | % |
| 1.18 | % |
| 1.23 | % |
| 1.35 | % |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets |
|
|
| 35.69 | %(d) |
|
| 15.32 | % |
| 15.65 | % |
| 14.04 | % |
| 14.22 | % |
| 9.08 | % |
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
| 298 | % |
|
| 323 | % |
| 216 | % |
| 192 | % |
| 216 | % |
| 194 | % |
|
|
(a) | Net investment income is calculated using average shares outstanding during period. |
|
|
(b) | The amount is less than $0.005 per share or 0.005%. |
|
|
(c) | Not annualized. |
|
|
(d) | Annualized. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
74
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Financial Highlights—Continued
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| Dynamic Financial Services Fund |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| Six Months |
| Year Ended |
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
| Period Ended |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Per Share Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net asset value per share, beginning of period |
|
| $ | 6.24 |
|
| $ | 13.89 |
| $ | 12.13 |
|
| $ | 10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Income from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
| 0.05 |
|
|
| 0.07 |
|
| (0.02 | ) |
|
| 0.02 |
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
| (0.57 | ) |
|
| (4.40 | ) |
| 2.54 |
|
|
| 2.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
|
| (0.52 | ) |
|
| (4.33 | ) |
| 2.52 |
|
|
| 2.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Redemption fees |
|
|
| 0.00 | (b) |
|
| 0.01 |
|
| 0.00 | (b) |
|
| 0.00 | (b) |
|
Less Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
|
| (0.10 | ) |
|
| — |
|
| (0.01 | ) |
|
| (0.01 | ) |
|
From net realized gains on investments |
|
|
| (0.41 | ) |
|
| (3.33 | ) |
| (0.75 | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total distributions |
|
|
| (0.51 | ) |
|
| (3.33 | ) |
| (0.76 | ) |
|
| (0.01 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Net asset value per share, end of period |
|
| $ | 5.21 |
|
| $ | 6.24 |
| $ | 13.89 |
|
| $ | 12.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total return |
|
|
| –7.34 | %(c) |
|
| –41.16 | % |
| 21.64 | % |
|
| 21.47 | % |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets at end of period (000) |
|
| $ | 5,668 |
|
| $ | 6,677 |
| $ | 10,820 |
|
| $ | 7,544 |
|
|
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 2.19 | %(d) |
|
| 1.94 | % |
| 2.61 | % |
|
| 2.53 | % |
|
After waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.42 | %(d) |
|
| 1.35 | % |
| 1.35 | % |
|
| 1.35 | % |
|
Ratio of interest expense to average net assets |
|
|
| 0.07 | %(d) |
|
| 0.37 | % |
| 1.02 | % |
|
| 0.01 | % |
|
Ratio of expenses to average net assets excluding interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 2.12 | %(d) |
|
| 1.57 | % |
| 1.59 | % |
|
| 2.52 | % |
|
After waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.35 | %(d) |
|
| 0.98 | % |
| 0.33 | % |
|
| 1.34 | % |
|
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets |
|
|
| 1.80 | %(d) |
|
| 1.32 | % |
| (0.16 | )% |
|
| 0.15 | % |
|
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
| 132 | % |
|
| 455 | % |
| 397 | % |
|
| 106 | % |
|
|
|
(a) | For the period from November 1, 2005 (inception of fund) to October 31, 2006. |
|
|
(b) | The amount is less than $0.005 per share or 0.005%. |
|
|
(c) | Not annualized. |
|
|
(d) | Annualized. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
75
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Financial Highlights—Continued
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| Dynamic Innovators Fund |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| Six Months |
| Year Ended |
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
| Period Ended |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Per Share Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net asset value per share, beginning of period |
|
| $ | 6.83 |
|
| $ | 14.08 |
| $ | 10.31 |
|
| $ | 10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Income from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
| (0.03 | ) |
|
| (0.01 | ) |
| 0.07 |
|
|
| 0.09 |
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
| (1.10 | ) |
|
| (6.84 | ) |
| 3.91 |
|
|
| 0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
|
| (1.13 | ) |
|
| (6.85 | ) |
| 3.98 |
|
|
| 0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Redemption fees |
|
|
| 0.00 | (b) |
|
| 0.03 |
|
| 0.01 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
Less Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| (0.02 | ) |
| (0.14 | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
From net realized gains on investments |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| (0.41 | ) |
| (0.08 | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total distributions |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| (0.43 | ) |
| (0.22 | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Net asset value per share, end of period |
|
| $ | 5.70 |
|
| $ | 6.83 |
| $ | 14.08 |
|
| $ | 10.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total return |
|
|
| –16.40 | %(c) |
|
| –49.95 | % |
| 39.47 | % |
|
| 3.10 | %(c) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets at end of period (000) |
|
| $ | 8,626 |
|
| $ | 15,383 |
| $ | 48,355 |
|
| $ | 5,073 |
|
|
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.96 | %(d) |
|
| 1.31 | % |
| 1.53 | % |
|
| 4.25 | %(d) |
|
After waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.55 | %(d) |
|
| 1.35 | % |
| 1.33 | % |
|
| 1.35 | %(d) |
|
Ratio of interest expense to average net assets |
|
|
| 0.20 | %(d) |
|
| 0.04 | % |
| 0.00 | % |
|
| 0.00 | % |
|
Ratio of expenses to average net assets excluding interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.76 | %(d) |
|
| 1.27 | % |
| 1.53 | % |
|
| 4.25 | %(d) |
|
After waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.35 | %(d) |
|
| 1.31 | % |
| 1.33 | % |
|
| 1.35 | %(d) |
|
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets |
|
|
| (0.88 | )%(d) |
|
| (0.18 | )% |
| 1.08 | % |
|
| 3.18 | %(d) |
|
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
| 10 | % |
|
| 76 | % |
| 135 | % |
|
| 3 | % |
|
|
|
(a) | For the period from July 11, 2006 (commencement of operations) to October 31, 2006. |
|
|
(b) | The amount is less than $0.005 per Share. |
|
|
(c) | Not annualized. |
|
|
(d) | Annualized. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
76
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Financial Highlights—Continued
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| Dynamic |
| ||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| Six Months |
| Period Ended |
| ||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||||||
Per Share Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net asset value per share, beginning of period |
|
| $ | 5.79 |
|
|
| $ | 10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
| 0.01 |
|
|
|
| 0.03 |
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
| 0.09 |
|
|
|
| (4.24 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total from investment operations |
|
|
| 0.10 |
|
|
|
| (4.21 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Redemption fees |
|
|
| 0.00 | (b) |
|
|
| 0.00 | (b) |
|
Less Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
|
| (0.04 | ) |
|
|
| — |
|
|
From net realized gains on investments |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total distributions |
|
|
| (0.04 | ) |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net asset value per share, end of period |
|
| $ | 5.85 |
|
|
| $ | 5.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total return |
|
|
| 1.60 | %(c) |
|
|
| –42.10 | %(c) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets at end of period (000) |
|
| $ | 2,642 |
|
|
| $ | 2,649 |
|
|
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 2.87 | %(d) |
|
|
| 2.95 | %(d) |
|
After waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.36 | %(d) |
|
|
| 1.35 | %(d) |
|
Ratio of interest expense to average net assets |
|
|
| 0.01 | %(d) |
|
|
| 0.00 | %(d) |
|
Ratio of expenses to average net assets excluding interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 2.86 | %(d) |
|
|
| 2.95 | %(d) |
|
After waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.35 | %(d) |
|
|
| 1.35 | %(d) |
|
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets |
|
|
| 0.59 | %(d) |
|
|
| 0.44 | %(d) |
|
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
| 46 | % |
|
|
| 108 | % |
|
|
|
(a) | For the period from December 31, 2007 (inception of fund) to October 31, 2008. |
|
|
(b) | The amount is less than $0.005 per share. |
|
|
(c) | Not annualized. |
|
|
(d) | Annualized. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
77
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Financial Highlights—Continued
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Accelerating |
| |||
|
|
| ||||
|
| Period Ended |
| |||
|
|
| ||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
| |||
Per Share Data: |
|
|
|
| ||
Net asset value per share, beginning of period |
|
| $ | 10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
| 0.02 |
|
|
Net realized and unrealized losses on investments |
|
|
| (0.16 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total from investment operations |
|
|
| (0.14 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Less Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
|
| — |
|
|
From net realized gains on investments |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total distributions |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net asset value per share, end of period |
|
| $ | 9.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total return |
|
|
| –1.40 | %(b) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets at end of period (000) |
|
| $ | 1,003 |
|
|
Ratio of expenses to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 5.92 | %(c) |
|
After waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.35 | %(c) |
|
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets |
|
|
| 0.39 | %(c) |
|
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
| 38 | % |
|
|
|
(a) | For the period from November 5, 2008 (inception of fund) to April 30, 2009. |
|
|
(b) | Not annualized. |
|
|
(c) | Annualized. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
78
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Financial Highlights—Continued
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| Municipal Money Market Fund |
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| Six Months |
| Year Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Per Share Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net asset value per share, beginning of period |
|
| $ | 1.00 |
|
| $ | 1.00 |
| $ | 1.00 |
| $ | 1.00 |
| $ | 1.00 |
| $ | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Income from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
| 0.01 |
|
|
| 0.03 |
|
| 0.04 |
|
| 0.03 |
|
| 0.02 |
|
| 0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
|
| 0.01 |
|
|
| 0.03 |
|
| 0.04 |
|
| 0.03 |
|
| 0.02 |
|
| 0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Less Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
|
| (0.01 | ) |
|
| (0.03 | ) |
| (0.04 | ) |
| (0.03 | ) |
| (0.02 | ) |
| (0.01 | ) |
Total distributions |
|
|
| (0.01 | ) |
|
| (0.03 | ) |
| (0.04 | ) |
| (0.03 | ) |
| (0.02 | ) |
| (0.01 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Net asset value per share, end of period |
|
| $ | 1.00 |
|
| $ | 1.00 |
| $ | 1.00 |
| $ | 1.00 |
| $ | 1.00 |
| $ | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total return |
|
|
| 0.65 | % |
|
| 2.94 | % |
| 3.68 | % |
| 3.33 | % |
| 2.24 | % |
| 1.09 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets at end of period (000) |
|
| $ | 652,057 |
|
| $ | 664,401 |
| $ | 1,115,100 |
| $ | 365,840 |
| $ | 204,689 |
| $ | 130,147 |
|
Ratio of expenses to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 0.55 | % |
|
| 0.49 | % |
| 0.49 | % |
| 0.53 | % |
| 0.53 | % |
| 0.70 | % |
After waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 0.54 | % |
|
| 0.35 | % |
| 0.26 | % |
| 0.30 | % |
| 0.27 | % |
| 0.34 | % |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets |
|
|
| 1.31 | % |
|
| 2.93 | % |
| 3.37 | % |
| 3.31 | % |
| 2.26 | % |
| 1.10 | % |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
79
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
|
Financial Highlights—Continued
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
| Six Months |
| Year Ended |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Period Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Adviser Class Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net asset value per share, beginning of period |
|
| $ | 10.05 |
|
| $ | 10.10 |
| $ | 10.10 |
| $ | 10.03 |
| $ | 10.15 |
|
| $ | 10.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Income from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
| 0.16 |
|
|
| 0.38 |
|
| 0.38 |
|
| 0.31 |
|
| 0.28 |
|
|
| 0.16 | (b) |
|
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
| 0.02 |
|
|
| (0.04 | ) |
| 0.00 |
|
| 0.09 |
|
| (0.12 | ) |
|
| (0.11 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
|
| 0.18 |
|
|
| 0.34 |
|
| 0.38 |
|
| 0.40 |
|
| 0.16 |
|
|
| 0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Less Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
|
| (0.16 | ) |
|
| (0.39 | ) |
| (0.38 | ) |
| (0.33 | ) |
| (0.28 | ) |
|
| (0.16 | ) |
|
From net realized gains on investments |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (0.00 | )(c) |
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total distributions |
|
|
| (0.16 | ) |
|
| (0.39 | ) |
| (0.38 | ) |
| (0.33 | ) |
| (0.28 | ) |
|
| (0.16 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Net asset value per share, end of period |
|
| $ | 10.07 |
|
| $ | 10.05 |
| $ | 10.10 |
| $ | 10.10 |
| $ | 10.03 |
|
| $ | 10.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total return |
|
|
| 1.80 | %(d) |
|
| 3.39 | % |
| 3.82 | % |
| 4.01 | % |
| 1.60 | % |
|
| 0.55 | %(d) |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets at end of period (000) |
|
| $ | 46,598 |
|
| $ | 11,568 |
| $ | 871,630 |
| $ | 408,535 |
| $ | 112,454 |
|
| $ | 22,159 |
|
|
Ratio of expenses to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 1.05 | %(e) |
|
| 1.08 | % |
| 1.14 | % |
| 1.16 | % |
| 1.15 | % |
|
| 1.25 | %(e) |
|
After waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 0.85 | %(e) |
|
| 0.85 | % |
| 0.85 | % |
| 0.85 | % |
| 0.85 | % |
|
| 0.85 | %(e) |
|
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets |
|
|
| 3.50 | %(e) |
|
| 4.12 | % |
| 3.82 | % |
| 3.33 | % |
| 2.73 | % |
|
| 2.41 | %(e) |
|
Portfolio turnover (f) |
|
|
| 10 | % |
|
| 129 | % |
| 171 | % |
| 96 | % |
| 97 | % |
|
| 55 | % |
|
|
|
(a) | For the period from March 30, 2004 (inception of fund) to October 31, 2004. |
|
|
(b) | Net investment income per share is calculated using ending balances prior to consideration of adjustment for permanent book and tax differences. |
|
|
(c) | The amount is less than $0.005 per share. |
|
|
(d) | Not annualized. |
|
|
(e) | Annualized. |
|
|
(f) | Portfolio turnover is calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole, without distinguishing between classes of shares issued. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
80
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Financial Highlights—Continued
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| Six Months |
| Year Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Investor Class Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net asset value per share, beginning of period |
|
| $ | 10.00 |
|
| $ | 10.04 |
| $ | 10.05 |
| $ | 10.03 |
| $ | 10.15 |
| $ | 10.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Income from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
| 0.17 |
|
|
| 0.41 |
|
| 0.40 |
|
| 0.36 |
|
| 0.30 |
|
| 0.27 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
| 0.02 |
|
|
| (0.04 | ) |
| (0.01 | ) |
| 0.02 |
|
| (0.12 | ) |
| (0.02 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
|
| 0.19 |
|
|
| 0.37 |
|
| 0.39 |
|
| 0.38 |
|
| 0.18 |
|
| 0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Less Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income |
|
|
| (0.17 | ) |
|
| (0.41 | ) |
| (0.40 | ) |
| (0.36 | ) |
| (0.30 | ) |
| (0.27 | ) |
From net realized gains on investments |
|
|
| 0.00 |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (0.00 | )(a) |
| — |
|
| (0.01 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total distributions |
|
|
| (0.17 | ) |
|
| (0.41 | ) |
| (0.40 | ) |
| (0.36 | ) |
| (0.30 | ) |
| (0.28 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Net asset value per share, end of period |
|
| $ | 10.02 |
|
| $ | 10.00 |
| $ | 10.04 |
| $ | 10.05 |
| $ | 10.03 |
| $ | 10.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total return |
|
|
| 1.92 | %(b) |
|
| 3.75 | % |
| 3.97 | % |
| 3.88 | % |
| 1.84 | % |
| 2.42 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets at end of period (000) |
|
| $ | 634,602 |
|
| $ | 231,679 |
| $ | 59,409 |
| $ | 45,260 |
| $ | 45,691 |
| $ | 51,302 |
|
Ratio of expenses to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 0.80 | %(c) |
|
| 0.83 | % |
| 0.89 | % |
| 0.91 | % |
| 0.90 | % |
| 1.04 | % |
After waivers, reimbursements, and recoveries |
|
|
| 0.60 | %(c) |
|
| 0.60 | % |
| 0.60 | % |
| 0.60 | % |
| 0.60 | % |
| 0.60 | % |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets |
|
|
| 3.75 | %(c) |
|
| 4.37 | % |
| 4.07 | % |
| 3.58 | % |
| 2.98 | % |
| 2.62 | % |
Portfolio turnover (d) |
|
|
| 10 | % |
|
| 129 | % |
| 171 | % |
| 96 | % |
| 97 | % |
| 55 | % |
|
|
(a) | The amount is less than $0.005 per share. |
|
|
(b) | Not annualized. |
|
|
(c) | Annualized. |
|
|
(d) | Portfolio turnover is calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole, without distinguishing between classes of shares issued. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
81
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Notes to Financial Statements
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
1. | Organization: |
|
|
| Alpine Series Trust (the “Series Trust”) was organized in 2001 as a Delaware business trust, and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-ended management investment company. Alpine Income Trust (the “Income Trust”) was organized in 2002 as a Delaware business trust, and is registered under the 1940 Act, as an open-ended management investment company. The Alpine Dynamic Balance Fund, Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund, Alpine Dynamic Financial Services Fund, Alpine Dynamic Innovators Fund, Alpine Dynamic Transformations Fund and Alpine Accelerating Dividend Fund are six separate funds of the Series Trust. The Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund and Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund are two separate funds of the Income Trust. Effective September 24, 2007, the Alpine Tax Optimized Fund changed its name to Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund. The Alpine Dynamic Balance Fund, Alpine Dynamic Dividend Fund, Alpine Dynamic Financial Services Fund, Alpine Dynamic Innovators Fund, Alpine Dynamic Transformations Fund, Alpine Accelerating Dividend Fund, Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund, and Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund (individually referred to as a “Fund” and collectively, “the Funds”) are diversified funds. Alpine Woods Capital Investors, LLC (the “Adviser”) is a Delaware limited liability company and serves as the investment manager to the Funds. The Board of Trustees approved the closing of the Adviser Class of the Alpine Municipal Money Market Fund on September 24, 2007. The final day of operation for this class was December 4, 2007. The Alpine Accelerating Dividend Fund commenced operations on November 5, 2008. |
|
|
2. | Significant Accounting Policies: |
|
|
| The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported herein. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
|
| A. Valuation of Securities: |
|
|
| The Dynamic Balance Fund, Dynamic Dividend Fund, Dynamic Financial Services Fund, Dynamic Innovators Fund, Dynamic Transformations Fund, Accelerating Dividend Fund and Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund value securities for which the primary market is on a domestic or foreign exchange and over-the-counter admitted to trading on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation Market System (“NASDAQ”) at the last quoted sales price at the end of each business day or, if no sale, at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices. Over-the-counter securities are valued at the last quoted sales price at the end of each business day or, if no sale, at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the close of U.S. markets but after the close of the securities’ primary markets, are valued at fair value as determined in good faith according to procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
|
|
| For example, fair value pricing may be used where: (i) a security is illiquid (restricted securities and repurchase agreements maturing in more than seven days); (ii) the market or exchange for a security is closed on an ordinary trading day and no other market prices are available; (iii) the security is so thinly traded that there have been no transactions in the stock over an extended period; or (iv) the validity of a market quotation received is questionable. In addition, fair value pricing will be used if emergency or unusual situations have occurred, such as when trading of a security on an exchange is suspended; or when an event occurs after the close of the exchange on which the security is principally traded that is likely to have changed the value of the security before the NAV is calculated (applicable to foreign securities). |
|
|
| Among those factors that may be considered when fair valuing a security are: fundamental analytical data relating to the investment in the security; evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the security is purchased and sold; type of security or asset; financial statements of issuer; special reports prepared by analysts or the Adviser; information as to any transactions or offers with respect to the security; and the historical tendency of the security’s price to track or respond to general and specific market movements (in terms of indices, sectors, or other market measurements). |
|
|
| As of April 30, 2009, the Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund held securities that are fair valued, which comprised 0.5% of the Fund’s net assets. |
82
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Notes to Financial Statements—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
| The valuation of certain debt securities are valued at the evaluated mean price based upon current market prices of securities which are comparable in coupon, rating, and maturity or an appropriate matrix utilizing similar factors. | |
|
|
|
| The Municipal Money Market Fund values its investments at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Pursuant to Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, amortized cost, as defined, is a method of valuing securities at acquisition cost, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount rather than at their value based on current market factors. | |
|
|
|
| The Funds adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“FAS 157”), effective November 1, 2008. In accordance with FAS 157, fair value is defined as the price that the Funds would receive upon selling an investment in a timely transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market of the investment. FAS 157 established a three-tier hierarchy to maximize the use of observable market data and minimize the use of unobservable inputs and to establish classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk, for example, the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique used to measure fair value including such a pricing model and/or the risk inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. Inputs may be observable or unobservable. Observable inputs are inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. | |
|
|
|
| Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds’ investments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below: | |
|
|
|
|
| Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. |
|
|
|
|
| Level 2 — Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.). |
|
|
|
|
| Level 3 — Significant unobservable inputs (including the Funds’ own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the Funds’ net assets as of April 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic Balance Fund |
| Dynamic Dividend Fund |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| Description |
| Investments |
| Written Option |
| Investments |
| Other Financial |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Level 1 – Quoted prices |
| $ | 39,360,404 |
| $ | 345,060 |
| $ | 498,302,519 |
| $ | (438,050 | ) |
| Level 2 – Other significant observable inputs |
|
| 10,527,507 |
|
| — |
|
| 6,900,167 |
|
| — |
|
| Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Total |
| $ | 49,887,911 |
| $ | 345,060 |
| $ | 505,202,686 |
| $ | (438,050 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Accelerating |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Description |
| Investments |
| Investments |
| Investments |
| Investments |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Level 1 – Quoted prices |
| $ | 4,843,753 |
| $ | 10,020,134 |
| $ | 2,492,157 |
| $ | 1,036,177 |
|
| Level 2 – Other significant observable inputs |
|
| 769,660 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Total |
| $ | 5,613,413 |
| $ | 10,020,134 |
| $ | 2,492,157 |
| $ | 1,036,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Notes to Financial Statements—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Municipal |
| Ultra Short |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Description |
| Investments |
| Investments |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Level 1 – Quoted prices |
| $ | 40,721,567 |
| $ | 62,018 |
|
| Level 2 – Other significant observable inputs |
|
| 578,079,423 |
|
| 670,274,814 |
|
| Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs |
|
| — |
|
| 3,525,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Total |
| $ | 618,800,990 |
| $ | 673,861,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| * | Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in the Schedule of Portfolio Investments, such as forward currency contracts and swap contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the instrument. Other financial instruments include unrealized deprecation of $462,494 for forward currency contracts and unrealized appreciation of $24,444 for swap contracts. |
|
|
|
| Following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic |
| Ultra Short |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Description |
| Investments |
| Investments |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Balance as of 10/31/08 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 4,080,000 |
|
| Accrued discounts / premiums |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| Realized gain (loss) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
|
| (278,282 | ) |
| (455,000 | ) |
| Net purchases (sales) |
|
| — |
|
| (100,000 | ) |
| Transfers in and / out of Level 3 |
|
| 278,282 |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Balance as of 4/30/09 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 3,525,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B. Security Transactions and Investment Income: |
|
|
| Security transactions are recorded on the date a security is purchased or sold (i.e. on the trade date). Realized gains and losses are computed on the identified cost basis. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums, where applicable. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or in the case of some foreign securities, on the date thereafter when the Funds are made aware of the dividend. Foreign income may be subject to foreign withholding taxes, which are accrued as applicable. Capital gains realized on some foreign securities are subject to foreign taxes, which are accrued as applicable. |
|
|
| Dividends and interest from non-U.S. sources received by the Funds are generally subject to non-U.S. withholding taxes at rates ranging up to 30%. Such withholding taxes may be reduced or eliminated under the terms of applicable U.S. income tax treaties, and the Funds intend to undertake any procedural steps required to claim the benefits of such treaties. |
|
|
| C. Short Sale Transactions: |
|
|
| The Dynamic Balance Fund, Dynamic Dividend Fund, Dynamic Financial Services Fund, Dynamic Innovators Fund, Dynamic Transformations Fund and Accelerating Dividend Fund are authorized to engage in short selling. Short sales are transactions in which a Fund sells a security it does not own in anticipation of a decline in the market value of that security. To complete such a transaction, a Fund must borrow the security to deliver to the buyer when affecting a short sale. The Fund is then obligated to replace the security borrowed by purchasing it in the open market at some later date. When a Fund sells a security short, an amount equal to the sales proceeds is included in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities as an asset and an equal amount as a liability. The amount of the liability is subsequently marked-to-market to reflect the current value of the short position. A Fund will incur a loss, which could be substantial and potentially unlimited, if the market price of the security increases between the date of the short sale and the date on which the Fund replaces the borrowed security. A Fund will realize a gain if |
84
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Notes to Financial Statements—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
| the security declines in value between those dates. A Fund is also at risk of incurring dividend expense if the issuer of the security that has been sold short declares a dividend. A Fund must pay the dividend to the lender of the security. Dividends on short positions are recorded as an expense on the ex-dividend date. |
|
|
| All short sales must be fully collateralized. Accordingly, each Fund maintains collateral in a segregated account with its custodian, consisting of cash and/or liquid securities sufficient to collateralize its obligations on short positions. |
|
|
| D. Written Option Contracts |
|
|
| The Funds may write (sell) put and call options. When the Funds write (sell) an option, an amount equal to the premium received by the Funds is included in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as an asset and an equivalent liability. The amount of the liability is subsequently market-to-market to reflect the current value of an option written. By writing an option, the Funds may become obligated during the term of the option to deliver (with respect to a call option) or purchase (with respect to a put option) the securities underlying the option at the exercise price if the option is exercised. When an option expires on its stipulated expiration date, the Funds realize a gain. When the Funds enter into a closing purchase transaction, the Funds realize a gain or loss if the cost of the closing purchase transaction differs from the premium received when the option was sold without regard to any unrealized gain or loss on the underlying security, and the liability related to such option is eliminated. If a call option written by a Fund is exercised, the proceeds of the sale of the underlying security will be increased by the premium originally received and the Fund will realize a gain or loss on the sale of the security. If a put option written by a Fund is exercised, the Fund’s basis in the underlying security will be reduced by the premium originally received. |
|
|
| The premium amount and the number of written option contracts during the six months ended April 30, 2009 were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic Balance Fund |
| Dynamic Dividend Fund |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
| Number of |
| Premium |
| Number of |
| Premium |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Options outstanding at October 31, 2008 |
|
| — |
| $ | — |
|
| — |
| $ | — |
|
| Options written |
|
| 1,621 |
|
| 318,442 |
|
| 2,720 |
|
| 672,620 |
|
| Options closed |
|
| (100 | ) |
| (49,700 | ) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| Options exercised |
|
| (200 | ) |
| (43,100 | ) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| Options expired |
|
| (300 | ) |
| (60,800 | ) |
| (2,720 | ) |
| (672,620 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Options outstanding at April 30, 2009 |
|
| 1,021 |
| $ | 164,842 |
|
| — |
| $ | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| E. Swap Contracts |
|
|
| The Dynamic Dividend Fund has entered into a long equity swap contract with Goldman Sachs Corp. A long equity swap contract entitles the Fund to receive from the counterparty any appreciation and dividends paid on an individual security, while obligating the Fund to pay the counterparty any depreciation on the security as well as interest on the notional amount of the contract at a rate equal to 80 basis points. |
|
|
| Fluctuations in the value of an open contract are recorded daily as a net unrealized gain or loss. The Fund will realize a gain or loss upon termination or reset of the contract. Either party, under certain conditions, may terminate the contract prior to the contract’s expiration date. |
|
|
| Credit risk may arise as a result of the failure of the counterparty to comply with the terms of the contract. The Fund considers the creditworthiness of each counterparty to a contract in evaluating potential credit risk quarterly. The counterparty risk to the Fund is limited to the net unrealized gain, if any, on the contract, along with dividends receivable on long equity contracts. Additionally, risk may arise from unanticipated movements in interest rates or in the value of the underlying securities. At April 30, 2009, the Dynamic Dividend Fund had the following open equity swap contract: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Termination |
| Security |
| Notional |
| Unrealized |
| Counterparty |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 4/20/10 |
| Telkom SA Ltd. |
| $4,085,768 |
| $24,444 |
| Goldman Sachs Corp. |
|
85
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Notes to Financial Statements—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
| F. Line of Credit: |
|
|
| Each Fund has a line of credit with U.S. Bank N.A. Loans in aggregate, whether to cover overdrafts or for investment purposes, may not exceed the maximum amount that is permitted under the 1940 Act. For the six months ended April 30, 2009, the average interest rate paid on outstanding borrowings under the line of credit was 0.85%, 1.01%, 1.10%, 1.13% and 1.51% for the Dynamic Balance Fund, Dynamic Dividend Fund, Dynamic Financial Services Fund, Dynamic Innovators Fund and Dynamic Transformations Fund, respectively. The Funds also incur interest expense on custody overdraft charges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total line of credit amount available |
| $ | 16,903,171 |
| $ | 218,692,362 |
| $ | 1,978,969 |
| $ | 3,453,701 |
|
Line of credit outstanding at April 30, 2009 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 1,703,000 |
|
Line of credit amount unused at April 30, 2009 |
|
| 16,903,171 |
|
| 218,692,362 |
|
| 1,978,969 |
|
| 1,750,701 |
|
Average balance outstanding during the period |
|
| 393,304 |
|
| 2,951,215 |
|
| 316,193 |
|
| 1,584,392 |
|
Interest expense incurred on line of credit during the period |
|
| 1,788 |
|
| 14,678 |
|
| 1,763 |
|
| 9,136 |
|
Interest expense incurred on custody overdrafts during the period |
|
| 16 |
|
| 829 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic |
| Accelerating |
| Municipal |
| Ultra Short |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total line of credit amount available |
| $ | 885,166 |
| $ | 360,313 |
| $ | 217,860,998 |
| $ | 228,996,341 |
|
Line of credit outstanding at April 30, 2009 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Line of credit amount unused at April 30, 2009 |
|
| 885,166 |
|
| 360,313 |
|
| 217,860,998 |
|
| 228,996,341 |
|
Average balance outstanding during the period |
|
| 16,227 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Interest expense incurred on line of credit during the period |
|
| 86 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Interest expense incurred on custody overdrafts during the period |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
| G. Income Taxes: |
|
|
| It is each Fund’s policy to comply with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute timely, all of its investment company taxable income and net realized capital gains to shareholders. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is recorded. |
|
|
| Under applicable foreign tax laws, a withholding tax may be imposed on interest, dividends, and capital gains earned on foreign investments. Where available, the Funds will file for claims on foreign taxes withheld. |
|
|
| H. Dividends and Distributions: |
|
|
| Each of the Dynamic Balance, Dynamic Dividend, Dynamic Financial Services, Dynamic Innovators, Dynamic Transformations, Accelerating Dividend Fund and Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Funds intends to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, throughout the year to its shareholders in the form of dividends. The Municipal Money Market Fund declares and accrues dividends daily on each business day based upon the Fund’s net income, and pays dividends monthly. Distributions to shareholders are recorded at the close of business on the ex-dividend date. All dividends are automatically reinvested in full and fractional shares of the Fund at net asset value per share, unless otherwise requested. |
|
|
| The amounts of dividends from net investment income and of distributions from net realized gains are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. These differences are either considered temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences do not require reclassification. In the event dividends and distributions to shareholders exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes they are reported as returns of capital. |
86
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Notes to Financial Statements—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
| I. Class Allocations: |
|
|
| Income, expenses (other than class specific expenses) and realized and unrealized gains and losses of the Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund are allocated among the classes of the Fund based on the relative net assets of each class. Class specific expenses are allocated to the class to which they relate. Currently, class specific expenses are limited to those incurred under the Distribution Plan for Adviser Class shares. |
|
|
| J. Foreign Currency Translation Transactions: |
|
|
| Each of the Dynamic Balance, Dynamic Dividend, Dynamic Financial Services, Dynamic Innovators, Dynamic Transformations and Accelerating Dividend Funds may invest up to 15%, 100%, 100%, 20%, 100% and 100%, respectively, of the value of its total assets in foreign securities. The books and records of each Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Non-U.S. denominated amounts are translated into U.S. dollars as follows, with the resultant translation gains and losses recorded in the Statements of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
| i) | market value of investment securities and other assets and liabilities at the exchange rate on the valuation date, |
|
|
|
|
|
| ii) | purchases and sales of investment securities, income and expenses at the exchange rate prevailing on the respective date of such transactions. |
|
|
| K. Risk Associated With Foreign Securities and Currencies: |
|
|
| Investments in securities of foreign issuers carry certain risks not ordinarily associated with investments in securities of domestic issuers. Such risks include future political and economic developments and the possible imposition of exchange controls or other foreign governmental laws and restrictions. In addition, with respect to certain countries, there is a possibility of expropriation of assets, confiscatory taxation, political or social instability or diplomatic developments, which could adversely affect investments in those countries. |
|
|
| Certain countries may also impose substantial restrictions on investments in their capital markets by foreign entities, including restrictions on investments in issuers or industries deemed sensitive to relevant national interests. These factors may limit the investment opportunities available to the Funds or result in a lack of liquidity and high price volatility with respect to securities of issuers from developing countries. |
|
|
| L. Equity-Linked Structured Notes |
|
|
| Certain Funds may invest in equity-linked structured notes. Equity-linked structured notes are derivative securities which are specially designed to combine the characteristics of one or more underlying securities and their equity derivatives in a single note form. The return and/or yield or income component may be based on the performance of the underlying equity securities, and equity index, and/or option positions. Equity-linked structured notes are typically offered in limited transactions by financial institutions in either registered or non-registered form. An investment in equity-linked structured notes creates exposure to the credit risk of the issuing financial institution, as well as to the market risk of the underlying securities. There is no guaranteed return of principal with these securities and the appreciation potential of these securities may be limited by a maximum payment or call right. In certain cases, equity-linked structured notes may be more volatile and less liquid than less complex securities or other types of fixed-income securities. Such securities may exhibit price behavior that does not correlate with other fixed-income securities. |
|
|
| M. Forward Currency Contracts: |
|
|
| A forward currency contract (“forward”) is an agreement between two parties to buy and sell a currency at a set price on a future date. The market value of the forward contract fluctuates with changes in forward currency exchange rates. The forward contract is marked-to-market daily and the change in market value is recorded by each Fund as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. When the forward contract is closed, a Fund records a realized gain or loss equal to the fluctuation in value during the period the forward contract was open. A Fund could be exposed to risk if a counterparty is unable to meet the terms of a forward or if the value of the currency changes unfavorably. |
|
|
| At April 30, 2009, the Dynamic Dividend Fund had entered into forward currency contracts with Goldman Sachs Corp. The net unrealized depreciation of $462,494 is included in the net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) section of the accompanying financial statements. The terms of the open forward contracts are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement |
| Currency to |
| U.S. $ Value |
| Currency to |
| U.S. $ Value |
| |||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
7/1/09 |
|
| 25,000,000 Euros |
| $ | 33,068,302 |
| U.S. Dollars |
| $ | 32,985,520 |
|
7/1/09 |
|
| 72,000,000 Norwegian Krone |
|
| 10,940,384 |
| U.S. Dollars |
|
| 10,560,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| $ | 44,008,686 |
|
|
| $ | 43,546,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Notes to Financial Statements—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
| N. New Accounting Pronouncements | |
|
|
|
| In March 2008, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 161”) was issued and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. SFAS 161 is intended to improve financial reporting for derivative instruments by requiring enhanced disclosure that enables investors to understand how and why an entity uses derivatives, how derivatives are accounted for, and how derivative instruments affect an entity’s results of operations and financial position. As of April 30, 2009, management does not believe the adoption of SFAS 161 will impact the financial statement amounts; however, additional footnote disclosures may be required about the use of derivative instruments and hedge items. | |
|
|
|
| O. Temporary Guarantee Program for Money Market Funds | |
|
|
|
| The Municipal Money Market Fund elected to participate in the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s (the “Treasury”) Temporary Guarantee Program for Money Market Funds (“Program”) that was set to expire on April 30, 2009, unless extended by the Treasury. On March 31, 2009, the Treasury announced the extension of the Program until September 18, 2009 and the Municipal Money Market Fund applied for continued participation in the Program. | |
|
|
|
| Additional information about the Program is available at http://www.ustreas.gov. | |
|
|
|
| 3. | Capital Share Transactions |
|
|
|
| The Funds have an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest, with $0.0001 par value, authorized. Transactions in shares and dollars of the Funds were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic Balance Fund |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| Shares |
| Amount |
| Shares |
| Amount |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Shares sold |
| 22,255 |
| $ | 170,968 |
| 49,518 |
| $ | 579,192 |
|
| Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends |
| 68,395 |
|
| 530,530 |
| 622,616 |
|
| 7,231,038 |
|
| Redemption fees |
| — |
|
| 10 |
| — |
|
| 1,353 |
|
| Shares redeemed |
| (349,898 | ) |
| (2,740,354 | ) | (972,223 | ) |
| (11,154,144 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Total net change |
| (259,248 | ) | $ | (2,038,846 | ) | (300,089 | ) | $ | (3,342,561 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic Dividend Fund |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| Shares |
| Amount |
| Shares |
| Amount |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Shares sold |
| 18,543,585 |
| $ | 89,312,985 |
| 53,657,887 |
| $ | 563,036,031 |
|
| Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends |
| 10,035,113 |
|
| 47,210,626 |
| 14,596,014 |
|
| 139,704,564 |
|
| Redemption fees |
| — |
|
| 96,854 |
| — |
|
| 517,263 |
|
| Shares redeemed |
| (24,693,819 | ) |
| (116,787,282 | ) | (76,116,507 | ) |
| (703,254,544 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Total net change |
| 3,884,879 |
| $ | 19,833,183 |
| (7,862,606 | ) | $ | 3,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic Financial Services Fund |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| Shares |
| Amount |
| Shares |
| Amount |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Shares sold |
| 163,017 |
| $ | 776,164 |
| 697,809 |
| $ | 6,472,426 |
|
| Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends |
| 94,660 |
|
| 473,302 |
| 201,690 |
|
| 2,103,627 |
|
| Redemption fees |
| — |
|
| 182 |
| — |
|
| 10,070 |
|
| Shares redeemed |
| (239,099 | ) |
| (1,160,814 | ) | (608,435 | ) |
| (5,310,381 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Total net change |
| 18,578 |
| $ | 88,834 |
| 291,064 |
| $ | 3,275,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Notes to Financial Statements—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic Innovators Fund |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| Shares |
| Amount |
| Shares |
| Amount |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Shares sold |
| 158,746 |
| $ | 891,494 |
| 3,672,630 |
| $ | 45,945,955 |
|
| Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends |
| — |
|
| — |
| 121,184 |
|
| 1,654,158 |
|
| Redemption fees |
| — |
|
| 973 |
| — |
|
| 117,477 |
|
| Shares redeemed |
| (900,143 | ) |
| (5,463,578 | ) | (4,975,251 | ) |
| (58,619,588 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Total net change |
| (741,399 | ) | $ | (4,571,111 | ) | (1,181,437 | ) | $ | (10,901,998 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic Transformations Fund |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Period Ended |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| Shares |
| Amount |
| Shares |
| Amount |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Shares sold |
| 1,648 |
| $ | 8,150 |
| 463,465 |
| $ | 4,630,875 |
|
| Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends |
| 3,343 |
|
| 17,115 |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| Redemption fees |
| — |
|
| 1 |
| — |
|
| 22 |
|
| Shares redeemed |
| (10,871 | ) |
| (45,900 | ) | (5,744 | ) |
| (45,439 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Total net change |
| (5,880 | ) | $ | (20,634 | ) | 457,721 |
| $ | 4,585,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) Fund commenced operations on December 31, 2007. | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Accelerating Dividend Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Period Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| Shares |
| Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Shares sold |
| 101,751 |
| $ | 1,017,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends |
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Redemption fees |
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shares redeemed |
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Total net change |
| 101,751 |
| $ | 1,017,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) Fund commenced operations on November 5, 2008. | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Municipal Money Market Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| Shares |
| Amount |
| Shares |
| Amount |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Adviser Class (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shares sold |
| — |
| $ | — |
| — |
| $ | — |
|
| Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends |
| — |
|
| — |
| 1,124 |
|
| 1,124 |
|
| Shares redeemed |
| — |
|
| — |
| (430,895 | ) |
| (430,895 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Total net change |
| — |
| $ | — |
| (429,771 | ) | $ | (429,771 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Investor Class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shares sold |
| 467,227,986 |
| $ | 467,227,986 |
| 5,315,613,045 |
| $ | 5,315,613,045 |
|
| Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends |
| 3,472,957 |
|
| 3,472,957 |
| 18,011,888 |
|
| 18,011,888 |
|
| Shares redeemed |
| (483,044,076 | ) |
| (483,044,076 | ) | (5,784,324,779 | ) |
| (5,784,324,779 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Total net change |
| (12,343,133 | ) | $ | (12,343,133 | ) | (450,699,846 | ) | $ | (450,699,846 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) The Municipal Money Market Fund - Adviser Class ceased operations on December 5, 2007. |
89
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Notes to Financial Statements—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
| Shares |
| Amount |
| Shares |
| Amount |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Adviser Class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shares sold |
|
| 3,879,287 |
| $ | 39,109,959 |
|
| 1,276,848 |
| $ | 12,879,474 |
|
| Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends |
|
| 31,843 |
|
| 320,594 |
|
| 18,092 |
|
| 182,093 |
|
| Redemption fees |
|
| — |
|
| 451 |
|
| — |
|
| 212 |
|
| Shares redeemed |
|
| (436,028 | ) |
| (4,395,101 | ) |
| (230,618 | ) |
| (2,323,435 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Total net change |
|
| 3,475,102 |
| $ | 35,035,903 |
|
| 1,064,322 |
| $ | 10,738,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Investor Class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shares sold |
|
| 48,896,661 |
| $ | 490,032,973 |
|
| 25,157,257 |
| $ | 252,396,026 |
|
| Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends |
|
| 601,564 |
|
| 6,022,037 |
|
| 546,879 |
|
| 5,477,503 |
|
| Redemption fees |
|
| — |
|
| 21,277 |
|
| — |
|
| 16,330 |
|
| Shares redeemed |
|
| (9,322,949 | ) |
| (93,435,219 | ) |
| (8,444,341 | ) |
| (84,627,222 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Total net change |
|
| 40,175,276 |
| $ | 402,641,068 |
|
| 17,259,795 |
| $ | 173,262,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. | Purchases and Sales of Securities: |
|
|
| Purchases and sales of securities (excluding short-term securities) for the six months ended April 30, 2009 are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-U.S. Government |
| U.S. Government |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
| Purchases |
| Sales |
| Purchases |
| Sales |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Dynamic Balance Fund |
| $ | 5,545,693 |
| $ | 3,276,800 |
| $ | 3,795,938 |
| $ | 11,545,684 |
|
| Dynamic Dividend Fund |
|
| 1,528,085,599 |
|
| 1,471,998,759 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| Dynamic Financial Services Fund |
|
| 7,356,571 |
|
| 7,824,131 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| Dynamic Innovators Fund |
|
| 1,140,595 |
|
| 3,883,281 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| Dynamic Transformations Fund |
|
| 1,149,549 |
|
| 967,687 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| Accelerating Dividend Fund |
|
| 977,356 |
|
| 178,712 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund |
|
| 61,209,266 |
|
| 3,620,000 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
5. | Distribution Plans: |
|
|
| Quasar Distributors, LLC (“Quasar”) serves as each Fund’s distributor. The Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund has adopted a distribution and servicing plan (the “Plan”) for its Adviser Class shares as allowed by Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Plan authorizes payments by the Fund in connection with the distribution and servicing of its shares at an annual rate, as determined from time to time by the Board of Trustees, of up to 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. Amounts paid under the Plan by the Fund may be spent by the Fund on any activities or expenses primarily intended to result in the sale of shares of the Fund, including but not limited to advertising, compensation for sales and marketing activities of financial institutions and others such as dealers and distributors, shareholder account servicing, the printing and mailing of prospectuses to other than current shareholders and the printing and mailing of sales literature. The Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund incurred $28,507 pursuant to the Plan for the six months ended April 30, 2009. |
|
|
| The Plan for the Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund may be terminated at any time by vote of the Trustees of the Income Trust who are not “interested persons”, as defined by the 1940 Act, of the Income Trust, or by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting shares of the respective class. |
90
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Notes to Financial Statements—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
6. | Investment Advisory Agreement and Other Affiliated Transactions: |
|
|
| Alpine Woods Capital Investors, LLC (“the Adviser”) provides investment advisory services to each of the Funds. Pursuant to the advisory agreements with the Funds, the Adviser is entitled to an annual fee based on 1.00% of each Fund’s average daily net assets for the Dynamic Balance Fund, Dynamic Dividend Fund, Dynamic Financial Services Fund, Dynamic Innovators Fund, Dynamic Transformations Fund and Accelerating Dividend Fund. The Adviser is entitled to an annual fee based on 0.45% of the Municipal Money Market Fund’s average daily net assets and an annual fee based on 0.75% of the Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund’s average daily net assets. |
|
|
| Waived expenses subject to potential recovery by year of expiration are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Year of Expiration |
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Municipal |
| Ultra Short |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| 10/31/09 |
| $ | 42,595 |
| $ | 24,393 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
| 10/31/10 |
|
| 26,625 |
|
| 22,424 |
|
| — |
|
| 1,718,243 |
|
| 148,724 |
|
| 10/31/11 |
|
| 22,153 |
|
| — |
|
| 53,829 |
|
| 1,007,557 |
|
| 322,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| At April 30, 2009, the Dynamic Dividend Fund had $984 invested in the Municipal Money Market Fund. |
91
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Notes to Financial Statements—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
7. | Federal Income Tax Information: |
|
|
| At October 31, 2008, the components of accumulated earnings (losses) on a tax basis were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Municipal |
| Ultra Short Tax |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of investments |
| $ | 68,450,799 |
| $ | 812,901,827 |
| $ | 13,402,185 |
| $ | 25,449,535 |
| $ | 4,740,417 |
| $ | 653,146,424 |
| $ | 218,567,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Gross unrealized appreciation |
| $ | 4,546,476 |
| $ | 11,378,357 |
| $ | 43,449 |
| $ | 991,516 |
| $ | 44,330 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 135,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
| (20,176,626 | ) |
| (264,940,073 | ) |
| (6,807,870 | ) |
| (11,533,604 | ) |
| (1,854,763 | ) |
| — |
|
| (1,095,515 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Net unrealized depreciation |
| $ | (15,630,150 | ) | $ | (253,561,716 | ) | $ | (6,764,421 | ) | $ | (10,542,088 | ) | $ | (1,810,433 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | (960,006 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Undistributed ordinary income |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 480,897 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 14,717 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 22,120 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Undistributed long-term capital gain |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Total distributable earnings |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 480,897 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 14,717 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 22,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Other accumulated losses |
| $ | (408,076 | ) | $ | (594,699,477 | ) | $ | (609 | ) | $ | (6,407,633 | ) | $ | (140,244 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | (54,689 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Total accumulated losses |
| $ | (16,038,226 | ) | $ | (848,261,193 | ) | $ | (6,284,133 | ) | $ | (16,949,721 | ) | $ | (1,935,960 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | (992,575 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The tax basis of investments for tax and financial reporting purposes differs principally due to the deferral of losses on wash sales, REIT tax adjustments, and mark-to-market cost basis adjustments for investments in passive foreign investment companies (PFICs) for tax purposes. |
|
|
| The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended October 31, 2008 and 2007 were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Dynamic Balance Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ordinary income |
| $ | 2,209,394 |
| $ | 2,193,895 |
|
| Long-term capital gain |
|
| 5,536,488 |
|
| 2,767,519 |
|
| Return of capital |
|
| 102,670 |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| 7,848,552 |
|
| 4,961,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| ||||||||
| Dynamic Dividend Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ordinary income |
| $ | 188,534,882 |
| $ | 151,334,543 |
|
| Long-term capital gain |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| Return of capital |
|
| 5,952,906 |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| $ | 194,487,788 |
| $ | 151,334,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Notes to Financial Statements—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dynamic Financial Services Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ordinary income |
| $ | 2,663,086 |
| $ | 540,721 |
|
| Long-term capital gain |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| $ | 2,663,086 |
| $ | 540,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| ||||||||
| Dynamic Innovators Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ordinary income |
| $ | 1,950,065 |
| $ | 109,960 |
|
| Long-term capital gain |
|
| 54,800 |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| $ | 2,004,865 |
| $ | 109,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| ||||||||
| Dynamic Transformations Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ordinary income |
| $ | — |
|
|
|
|
| Long-term capital gain |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| ||||||||
| Municipal Money Market Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Exempt interest dividends |
| $ | 22,003,941 |
| $ | 27,398,638 |
|
| Ordinary income |
|
| 141,465 |
|
| 185 |
|
| Long-term capital gain |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| $ | 22,145,406 |
| $ | 27,398,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| ||||||||
| Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ordinary income |
| $ | 297,298 |
| $ | 674,305 |
|
| Exempt interest dividends |
|
| 5,927,147 |
|
| 1,413,327 |
|
| Long-term capital gain |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| $ | 6,224,445 |
| $ | 2,087,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital loss carryovers as of October 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Expiration Date |
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Dynamic |
| Ultra Short |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| 10/31/2013 |
|
| — |
| $ | 4,335,047 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 10/31/2014 |
|
| — |
| $ | 15,084,034 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| $ | 52,577 |
|
| 10/31/2015 |
|
| — |
| $ | 37,200,325 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| $ | 2,112 |
|
| 10/31/2016 |
| $ | 455,326 |
| $ | 536,971,822 |
| $ | 6,407,682 |
| $ | 140,244 |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
| ||
| * | Capital gain distributions will resume in the future to the extent gains are realized in excess of the available capital loss carryovers. |
|
|
|
| For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008, the Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund utilized $2,783 of capital loss carryovers. | |
|
|
|
| Effective April 30, 2008, the Funds adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken on previously filed tax returns or expected to be taken on future returns. These positions must meet a “more-likely-than-not” standard that, based on the technical merits, have a more than fifty percent likelihood of being sustained upon examination. In evaluating whether a tax position has met the recognition threshold, the Funds must presume that the position will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. Tax positions not deemed to meet the “more-likely-than-not” threshold are recorded as a tax expense in the current year. |
93
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Notes to Financial Statements—Continued
April 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
| FIN 48 requires the Funds to analyze all open tax years, as defined by the Statute of Limitations, for all major jurisdictions. Open tax years are those that are open for exam by taxing authorities. Major jurisdictions for the Funds included Federal and the state of New York. As of October 31, 2008, open Federal and New York tax years include the tax years ended October 31, 2005 through 2008. The Funds have no examination in progress. |
|
|
| The Funds have reviewed all open tax years and major jurisdictions and concluded that the adoption of FIN 48 resulted in no effect to any Fund’s financial position or results of operations. There is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits relating to uncertain income tax positions taken or expected to be taken on the tax return for the fiscal year-end October 31, 2008. Also, the Funds have recognized no interest and penalties related to uncertain tax benefits. The Funds are also not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next six months. |
94
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Additional Information (Unaudited)
Expense Examples
April 30, 2009
As a shareholder of the Dynamic Balance Fund, Dynamic Dividend Fund, Dynamic Financial Services Fund, Dynamic Innovators Fund, Dynamic Transformations Fund, Accelerating Dividend Fund and Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund – Adviser and Investor Class, you will incur two types of costs: (1) redemption fees and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and/or service fees; and other Fund expenses. As a shareholder of the Municipal Money Market Fund, you will incur ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and/or service fee; and other Fund expenses. The examples below are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The examples are based on an investment of $1,000 for the period 11/1/2008-4/30/2009.
Actual Expenses
The first line of the tables below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. The Funds charge no sales load (except the Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund-Adviser Class, which charges a sales load of 0.50% on purchases) or transaction fees, but do assess shareholders for outgoing wire transfers, returned checks and stop payment orders at prevailing rates charged by U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, the Funds’ transfer agent. If you request a redemption by wire transfer, currently a $15.00 fee is charged by the Funds’ transfer agent. Shareholders in the Dynamic Balance Fund, Dynamic Dividend Fund, Dynamic Financial Services Fund, Dynamic Innovators Fund, Dynamic Transformations Fund and Accelerating Dividend Fund will be charged a redemption fee equal to 1.00% of the net amount of the redemption if they redeem their shares less than 2 months after purchase. Shareholders in the Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund – Adviser and Investor Class will be charged a redemption fee equal to 0.25% of the net amount of the redemption if they redeem their shares less than one month after purchase. IRA accounts will be charged a $15.00 annual maintenance fee. To the extent the Funds invest in shares of other investment companies as a part of their investment strategies, you will indirectly bear your proportionate share of any fees and expenses charged by the underlying funds in which the Funds invest in addition to the expenses of the Fund. These expenses are not included in the example below. The example below includes, but is not limited to, management fees, shareholder servicing fees, fund accounting, custody and transfer agent fees. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during the period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Funds’ actual expense ratios and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which does not represent the Funds’ actual returns. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Funds and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds. Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as redemption fees. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
95
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Additional Information (Unaudited)—Continued
Expense Examples
April 30, 2009
Dynamic Balance Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Beginning |
| Ending |
| Expenses Paid |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Actual (1) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 997.80 |
|
|
| $ | 6.24 |
|
|
Hypothetical (2) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 1,018.55 |
|
|
| $ | 6.31 |
|
|
|
|
(1) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a –0.22% return. The return is considered after expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
(2) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a 5.00% annual return. The return is considered before expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
(3) | Excluding interest expense of 0.01%, the actual and hypothetical expenses paid during the period were $6.19 and $6.26, respectively. |
|
|
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.26%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Dynamic Dividend Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Beginning |
| Ending |
| Expenses Paid |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Actual (1) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 903.40 |
|
|
| $ | 5.62 |
|
|
Hypothetical (2) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 1,018.89 |
|
|
| $ | 5.96 |
|
|
|
|
(1) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a –9.66% return. The return is considered after expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
(2) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a 5.00% annual return. The return is considered before expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
(3) | Excluding interest expense of 0.01%, the actual and hypothetical expenses paid during the period were $5.57 and $5.91, respectively. |
|
|
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.19%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Dynamic Financial Services Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Beginning |
| Ending |
| Expenses Paid |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Actual (1) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 926.60 |
|
|
| $ | 6.78 |
|
|
Hypothetical (2) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 1,017.75 |
|
|
| $ | 7.10 |
|
|
|
|
(1) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a –7.34% return. The return is considered after expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
(2) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a 5.00% annual return. The return is considered before expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
(3) | Excluding interest expense of 0.07%, the actual and hypothetical expenses paid during the period were $6.45 and $6.76, respectively. |
|
|
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.42%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
96
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Additional Information (Unaudited)—Continued
Expense Examples
April 30, 2009
Dynamic Innovators Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Beginning |
| Ending |
| Expenses Paid |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Actual (1) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 836.00 |
|
|
| $ | 7.06 |
|
|
Hypothetical (2) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 1,017.11 |
|
|
| $ | 7.75 |
|
|
|
|
(1) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a –16.40% return. The return is considered after expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
(2) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a 5.00% annual return. The return is considered before expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
(3) | Excluding interest expense of 0.20%, the actual and hypothetical expenses paid during the period were $6.15 and $6.76, respectively. |
|
|
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.55%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Dynamic Transformations Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Beginning |
| Ending |
| Expenses Paid |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Actual (1) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 1,016.00 |
|
|
| $ | 6.80 |
|
|
Hypothetical (2) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 1,018.05 |
|
|
| $ | 6.80 |
|
|
|
|
(1) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a 1.60% return. The return is considered after expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
(2) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a 5.00% annual return. The return is considered before expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
(3) | Excluding interest expense of 0.01%, the actual and hypothetical expenses paid during the period were $6.75 and $6.76, respectively. |
|
|
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.36%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Accelerating Dividend Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Beginning |
| Ending |
| Expenses Paid |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Actual (1) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 986.00 |
|
|
| $ | 6.46 |
|
|
Hypothetical (2) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 1,018.10 |
|
|
| $ | 6.76 |
|
|
|
|
(1) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a –1.40% return. The return is considered after expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
(2) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a 5.00% annual return. The return is considered before expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
* | Actual expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.35%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 176/365 (to reflect the period November 5, 2008-April 30, 2009, the Fund’s commencement of operations date to the end of the period). Hypothetical expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.35%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
97
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
Additional Information (Unaudited)—Continued
Expense Examples
April 30, 2009
Municipal Money Market Fund
Investor Class Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Beginning |
| Ending |
| Expenses Paid |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Actual (1) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 1,006.50 |
|
|
| $ | 2.69 |
|
|
Hypothetical (2) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 1,022.12 |
|
|
| $ | 2.71 |
|
|
|
|
(1) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a 0.65% return. The return is considered after expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
(2) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a 5.00% annual return. The return is considered before expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.54%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund
Adviser Class Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Beginning |
| Ending |
| Expenses Paid |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Actual (1) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 1,018.00 |
|
|
| $ | 4.25 |
|
|
Hypothetical (2) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 1,020.58 |
|
|
| $ | 4.26 |
|
|
|
|
(1) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a 1.80% return. The return is considered after expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
(2) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a 5.00% annual return. The return is considered before expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.85%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund
Investor Class Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Beginning |
| Ending |
| Expenses Paid |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Actual (1) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 1,019.20 |
|
|
| $ | 3.00 |
|
|
Hypothetical (2) |
|
| $ | 1,000.00 |
|
|
| $ | 1,021.82 |
|
|
| $ | 3.01 |
|
|
|
|
(1) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a 1.92% return. The return is considered after expenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
(2) | Ending account values and expenses paid during period based on a 5.00% annual return. The return is considered beforeexpenses are deducted from the Fund. |
|
|
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.60%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
98
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
|
Additional Information (Unaudited)—Continued |
Investment Advisor and Advisory Contract
On December 15, 2008, at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval, the Boards of Trustees, including all of the Trustees who are not parties to the Advisory Contracts or interested persons of any such party (the non-interested Trustees), approved the continuance of the Advisory Contracts for the Funds. In so doing, the Board Members studied materials specifically relating to the Advisory Contracts provided by the Adviser, the Funds’ counsel and the Funds’ administrator (“USBFS”). The Board Members considered a variety of factors, including the following:
The Board Members considered the expected nature, quality and scope of the management and investment advisory services and personnel provided to each Fund by the Adviser; the rate of investment advisory fees payable to the Adviser and a comparison of the fees paid by comparable funds; the compensation (in addition to the investment advisory fees) and other benefits received by the Adviser and its respective affiliates; the Adviser’s costs in providing services; the economies of scale realized by the Adviser; the annual operating expenses of each Fund; and the policies and practices of the Adviser with respect to portfolio transactions for each Fund.
After reviewing the diligence materials provided by USBFS, the Adviser and Fund Counsel, the Board began a discussion to assess the overall quality of services. The Board considered the Adviser’s specific responsibilities in all aspects of day-to-day management of each Fund managed by the Adviser, as well as the qualifications, experience and responsibilities of the portfolio managers and other key personnel at the Advisor involved in the day-to-day activities of each Fund. The Board also considered, with regard to each Fund, the prior relationship between the Adviser and the Fund, as well as the Board’s knowledge of the Adviser’s operations. The Trustees also considered the Adviser’s marketing activity and commitment to Fund growth. The Trustees also considered the structure and effectiveness of the Adviser’s compliance procedures and the Adviser’s record of willingness to meet in person with the Trustees to discuss various performance, marketing and compliance issues. The Trustees also noted any services that extended beyond portfolio management, and they considered the trading capability of the Adviser.
The Board Members also evaluated the investment performance of the Funds on an absolute basis, relative to their respective benchmark indices over the last year, three years, five years, ten years and since inception (as applicable) and in comparison to their relative peer groups.
The Board Members also reviewed Lipper analytical data relating to average expenses and advisory fees for comparable funds. Based on the information provided, the Board Members determined that each Fund’s fee structure is competitive with funds having similar investment goals and strategies.
The Board Members considered each Fund’s total expense ratios and contractual investment advisory fees compared to its respective industry average by quartile, within the appropriate Lipper benchmark category and Lipper category range. The Board Members also considered the amount and nature of fees paid by shareholders.
The Trustees also considered the overall profitability of the Adviser, reviewing certain financial information and noting in particular whether the Adviser had subsidized a Fund’s operations in its early years and whether it had recouped the amount of these subsidies. The Trustees considered both the direct and indirect benefits to the Adviser from advising the Funds. The Trustees also examined the level of profits that could be expected to accrue to the Adviser from the fees payable under the Agreements and any expense subsidization undertaken by the Adviser, as well as each Fund’s brokerage and commissions. The Board Members considered the fact that the Adviser has contractually agreed to waive a portion of its fees for the Dynamic Balance Fund, the Dynamic Dividend Fund, the Dynamic Financial Services Fund, the Dynamic Innovators Fund, the Dynamic Transformations Fund, the Accelerating Dividend Fund and the Ultra Short Tax Optimized Income Fund for a period of one year, to be reviewed again at the next Advisory Contract renewal. It was noted that each Fund’s management fee and expense ratio are within the average range compared to its peer funds.
Based on the Board Members’ review and consultation with the Funds’ independent counsel, of the material aspects of the Advisory Contracts, including the foregoing factors and such other information believed to be reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the Advisory Contracts, the Board Members, including all of the non-interested Trustees voting separately, concluded that the continuation of the Advisory Contracts would be in the best interest of the Funds’ shareholders, and determined that the compensation to the Adviser provided for in the Advisory Contracts is fair and equitable.
99
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
|
Additional Information (Unaudited)—Continued |
April 30, 2009 |
Information about Trustees and Officers
The business and affairs of the Funds are managed under the direction of Trusts’ Board of Trustees. Information pertaining to the Trustees and Officers of the Funds is set forth below. The SAI includes additional information about the Funds’ Trustees and Officers and is available, without charge, upon request by calling 1-888-785-5578.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Trustees | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Age |
| Position(s) |
| Term of Office |
| Principal Occupation During |
| # of |
| Other Directorships |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Laurence B. Ashkin (80) |
| Independent Trustee |
| Indefinite, since the Trust’s inception |
| Real estate developer since 1980; Founder and President of Centrum Properties, Inc. since 1980. |
| 16 |
| Board of Trustees Chairman, Perspective Charter Schools, Chicago, IL; Director, Chicago Public Radio; Trustee of each of the Alpine Trusts.* |
H. Guy Leibler (54) |
| Independent Trustee |
| Indefinite, since the Trust’s inception |
| Private investor, since 2007; Vice Chair and Chief Operating Officer of L&L Acquisitions, LLC (2004-2007); President, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP (2001–2004). |
| 16 |
| Chairman Emeritus, White Plains Hospital Center; Trustee of each of the Alpine Trusts. |
Jeffrey E. Wacksman (48) |
| Independent Trustee |
| Indefinite, since 2004 |
| Partner, Loeb, Block & Partners LLP since 1994. |
| 16 |
| Director, International Succession Planning Association; Trustee, Larchmont Manor Park Society; Director, Bondi Icebergs Inc. (Women’s Sportswear); Director, MH Properties, Inc.; Trustee, each of the Alpine Trusts.* |
|
|
* | The term “Fund Complex” refers to the Funds in the Alpine Equity Trust, Alpine Series Trust, and Alpine Income Trust, and Alpine Global Dynamic Dividend Fund, Alpine Total Dynamic Dividend Fund, and Alpine Global Premier Properties Fund (the “Alpine Trusts”). |
100
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
|
Additional Information (Unaudited)—Continued |
April 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interested Trustees & Officers | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Age |
| Position(s) |
| Term of Office |
| Principal Occupation During |
| # of |
| Other Directorships |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Samuel A. Lieber* (52) |
| Interested Trustee, President and Portfolio Manager |
| Indefinite, since the Trust’s inception |
| CEO of Alpine Woods Capital Investors, LLC since November 1997. President of Alpine Trusts since 1998. |
| 16 |
| Trustee, each of the Alpine Trusts. |
Stephen A. Lieber*** (83) |
| Vice President and Portfolio Manager |
| Indefinite, since the Trust’s inception |
| Chief Investment Officer, Alpine Woods Capital Investors, LLC since 2003; Chairman and Senior Portfolio Manager, Saxon Woods Advisors, LLC since 1999. |
| N/A |
| None |
Robert W. Gadsden (51) |
| Vice President and Portfolio Manager |
| Indefinite, since 1999 |
| Portfolio Manager and Senior Real Estate Analyst of Alpine Woods Capital Investors, LLC since 1999. Formerly Vice President, Prudential Realty Group (1990-1999). |
| N/A |
| None |
John Megyesi (48) |
| Chief Compliance Officer |
| Indefinite, since January 2009 |
| Chief Compliance Officer, Alpine Woods Capital Investors, LLC since January 2009; Vice President and Manager, Trade Surveillance, Credit Suisse Asset Management, LLC (2006-2009); Manager, Trading and Surveillance, Allianz Global Investors (2004-2006). |
| N/A |
| None |
Victor Chan (37) |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| Indefinite, since April 2009 |
| Chief Financial Officer, Alpine Woods Capital Investors, LLC since April 2009; Audit Manager, RSM McGladrey & Pullen LLP (2004-2009). |
| N/A |
| None |
Meimei Li (45) |
| Treasurer |
| Indefinite, since March 2009 |
| Controller, Alpine Woods Capital Investors, LLC since February 2007; Senior Accountant, Pinnacle Group (2005-2007); Senior Auditor, Eisner & Lubin LLP (2001-2005). |
| N/A |
| None |
Andrew Pappert (29) |
| Secretary |
| Indefinite, since March 2009 |
| Director of Fund Operations, Alpine Woods Capital Investors, LLC since September 2008; Assistant Vice President, Mutual Fund Operations, Credit Suisse Asset Management, LLC (2003-2008). |
| N/A |
| None |
|
|
* | Denotes Trustees who are “interested persons” of the Trust or Fund under the 1940 Act. |
|
|
** | The term “Fund Complex” refers to the Funds in the Alpine Equity Trust, Alpine Series Trust, and Alpine Income Trust, and Alpine Global Dynamic Dividend Fund, Alpine Total Dynamic Dividend Fund, and Alpine Global Premier Properties Fund (the “Alpine Trust”). |
|
|
*** | Stephen A. Lieber is the father of Samuel A. Lieber. |
Tax Information
The Funds designated the following percentages of dividends declared from net investment income for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008 as qualified dividend income under the Jobs & Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
Dynamic Balance Fund |
|
| 66 | % |
Dynamic Dividend Fund |
|
| 57 | % |
Dynamic Financial Services Fund |
|
| 4 | % |
Dynamic Innovators Fund |
|
| 1 | % |
Dynamic Transformations Fund |
|
| 0 | % |
101
|
Alpine Mutual Funds |
|
Additional Information (Unaudited)—Continued |
April 30, 2009 |
The Funds designated the following percentages of dividends declared during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008 as dividends qualifying for the dividends received deduction available to corporate shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
Dynamic Balance Fund |
|
| 50 | % |
Dynamic Dividend Fund |
|
| 26 | % |
Dynamic Financial Services Fund |
|
| 0 | % |
Dynamic Innovators Fund |
|
| 0 | % |
Dynamic Transformations Fund |
|
| 0 | % |
Availability of Proxy Voting Information
Information regarding how each Fund votes proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge upon request by calling toll-free at 1-888-785-5578 and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Information regarding how each Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve month period ended June 30 is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or by calling the toll-free number listed above.
Availability of Quarterly Portfolio Schedule
Beginning with each Fund’s fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2004, each Fund filed its complete schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC. Going forward, each Fund will file Form N-Q for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Each Fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-202-551-8090.
102
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
|
|
| TRUSTEES |
| Samuel A. Lieber |
| Laurence B. Ashkin |
| H. Guy Leibler |
| Jeffrey E. Wacksman |
|
|
| CUSTODIAN |
| U.S. Bank, N.A. |
| 1555 N. Rivercenter Dr. Suite 302 |
| Milwaukee, WI 53212 |
|
|
| SUB-CUSTODIAN |
| The Bank of New York Mellon |
| One Wall Street |
| New York, NY 10286 |
|
|
| INDEPENDENT REGISTERED |
| PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
Deloitte & Touche LLP | |
555 East Wells Street | |
Milwaukee, WI 53202 | |
| |
SHAREHOLDER | INVESTOR INFORMATION | FUND COUNSEL |
1(888)785.5578 | Blank Rome LLP |
www.alpinefunds.com | The Chrysler Building |
| 405 Lexington Avenue |
| New York, NY 10174 |
|
|
| DISTRIBUTOR |
| Quasar Distributors, LLC |
| 615 East Michigan Street |
| Milwaukee, WI 53202 |
|
|
| INVESTMENT ADVISER |
| Alpine Woods Capital Investors, LLC |
| 2500 Westchester Ave., Suite 215 |
| Purchase, NY 10577 |
|
|
| TRANSFER AGENT & |
| ADMINISTRATOR |
| US Bancorp Fund Services, LLC |
This material must be preceded | 615 East Michigan Street |
Milwaukee, WI 53202 |
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable to registrants who are not listed issuers (as defined in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Item 6. Investments.
Schedule of Investments is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable to open-end investment companies.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable to open-end investment companies.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable to open-end investment companies.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s board of trustees. The registrant’s Nominating Committee policy states that any shareholder of a Fund may submit the name of a candidate by consideration by the Nominating Committee by submitting a written nomination to the Fund’s secretary in accordance with the provisions of the Fund’s Agreement and Declaration of the
2
Fund, as may be amended from time to time. The secretary will forward any such nomination to the Nominating Committee promptly upon receipt.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) | The Registrant’s President and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”)) as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this report, as required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the Act and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on their review, such officers have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in this report is appropriately recorded, processed, summarized and reported and made known to them by others within the Registrant and by the Registrant’s service provider. |
(b) | There were no changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a) | (1) Any code of ethics or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy Item 2 requirements through filing an exhibit. Not applicable. |
(2) A separate certification for each principal executive and principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. | |
(3) Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the Act sent or given during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the registrant to 10 or more persons. Not applicable to open-end investment companies. | |
(b) | Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Furnished herewith. |
3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) | Alpine Series Trust | ||
By (Signature and Title)* | /s/ Samuel A. Lieber | ||
Samuel A. Lieber, President | |||
Date 7/06/2009 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title)* | /s/ Samuel A. Lieber | ||
Samuel A. Lieber, President | |||
Date 7/06/2009 | |||
By (Signature and Title)* | /s/ Victor Chan | ||
Victor Chan, Chief Financial Officer | |||
Date 7/06/2009 |
* Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.
4