The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the total dollar amount of interest income from average interest-earning assets and the resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates. No tax equivalent adjustments were made.
The Bank recorded no provision for loan losses for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net charge-offs for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 totaled $203,000 compared to $2.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, the Bank sold $6.2 million of one-to-four family and commercial real estate loans and properties which had been foreclosed upon for $4.0 million. The Bank had previously established reserves for losses totaling $2.2 million on this group of assets so no additional loss provisions were necessary as a result of this transaction. The purpose of the loan sale was to reduce the amount of problem assets on the Bank’s books so management could continue to focus on returning the Bank to profitability. The decreased level of charge-offs in 2006 was the result of improved credit quality in our loan portfolio resulting from aggressive efforts in dealing with problem loans in 2005.
The Bank recorded $0 provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to a $385,000 recovery for same period a year ago. The recovery in 2005 was possible due to the Bank receiving payoffs on two loan relationships totaling $1.5 million for which the Bank has previously provided loan loss allowances of $535,000. Asset quality was considered in determining the need for a provision for loan losses. If the level of non-performing assets increases, a provision for loan loss may be needed. No provision in the second quarter of 2006 was needed as the Bank has maintained a low level of charge-offs as compared to previous years and has lowered the level of total non-performing assets. Loans charged off during the six months ended June 30, 2006 were already reserved for in the provision for loan losses as of December 31, 2005. Net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2006 totaled $305,000 compared to $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The decreased level of charge-offs in 2006 was the result of improved credit quality in our loan portfolio resulting from aggressive efforts in dealing with problem loans in 2005.
The following table presents non-performing assets and certain asset quality ratios at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
Provision for Loan Losses, continued
The Bank had 12 non-performing loan relationships as of June 30, 2006 compared to 11 non-performing loan relationships as of December 31, 2005 which is a result of stabilizing credit quality and implementing the credit policies set in place by senior management since September, 2004. The improvement of asset quality remains a priority while management continues to focus on loan growth.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income decreased $41,000 or 4.9%, to $803,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as compared to $844,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Fees and service charges increased to $579,000 from $531,000 for the same period a year ago as the Bank increased its level of bounce protection on customer direct deposit accounts (effective May 1, 2006) which created a $33,000 increase in NSF fees. The remaining increase in fees and service charges compared to the same period a year ago was from a $9,000 increase in fees for certificates of deposit early withdrawal penalties and a $5,000 increase in ATM income. Gain on sale of loans decreased to $92,000 from $123,000 for the same quarter a year ago as mortgage banking activities were reduced compared to the same quarter in 2005 due to lower than expected sales of loans (38 for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 compared to 47 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005) and rising interest rates. Other income decreased $54,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005. This was primarily due to the Bank earning a $56,000 gain on the sale of its Jonesville branch office in June 2005.
Noninterest income decreased $69,000 or 4.2%, to $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Fees and service charges increased to $1.0 million from $997,000 for the same period a year ago due to the reasons mentioned in the preceding paragraph. Gain on sale of loans decreased to $160,000 from $260,000 for the same period a year ago as mortgage banking activities were reduced compared to the same period in 2005 due to lower than expected sales of loans (66 as of June 30, 2006 compared to 92 as of June 30, 2005) due to a lower level of customer refinancing and rising interest rates. Other income decreased $9,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005. Net gains on sales of fixed assets (including the Jonesville branch office) decreased to $0 from $45,000 for the same period a year ago. Net gains on sales of real estate owned were $8,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $19,000 in losses on sales of real estate for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The remaining increases in other income were not significant.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense increased $2,000 or 0.1%, for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Salaries and employee benefits increased $39,000 due to annual salary and wage increases approved the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors for 2006. Occupancy and equipment decreased $28,000 for those same periods due to decreased maintenance costs and depreciation expense. Professional fees decreased $25,000 as accounting, auditing, and legal costs decreased, and data processing expense increased $16,000 due to higher licensing, software and service bureau costs. Foreclosed property expenses increased $59,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. Management recorded $42,000 in writedowns of foreclosed properties in the second quarter of June 2006 compared to $8,000 in writedowns in the second quarter of 2005. The Bank had a $25,000 increase in foreclosed property operating expenses for the same respective periods. Amortization of core deposit intangible decreased $17,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as amortization of this asset continues to slow from year to year. Management expects to see an expense of $23,000 per month for the remainder of 2006 compared to $29,000 for the last three quarters of 2005. Other decreases in noninterest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the same period for 2005 include a $4,000 decrease in Michigan Single Business taxes due to lower taxable income, a $17,000 decrease in office supplies and printing expenses resulting from the reduction of supply inventory levels, and a $17,000 decrease in loan fees related to indirect lending as management has decided to significantly reduce this activity due to the credit risk involved.
Noninterest expense decreased by $356,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of 6.6%. Salaries and employee benefits increased $41,000, occupancy and equipment expense decreased $59,000 and professional fees decreased $41,000 for the same reasons mentioned above. Foreclosed property expenses decreased $195,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. Management recorded a $42,000 in writedowns of foreclosed properties compared to $283,000 in the six month period ending June 2005, and the Bank had a $46,000 increase in foreclosed property operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005. Amortization of core deposit intangible decreased $41,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Other decreases in noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the same period for 2005 include a $20,000 decrease in Michigan Single Business taxes, a $22,000 decrease in office supplies and printing expenses and a $23,000 decrease in loan fees related to indirect lending all of which were for the same reasons mentioned above.
Federal Income Tax Expense
The Company’s provision for federal income taxes increased $10,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was 29.1% of income before tax as compared to 25.5% for the same period in 2005.
11
Federal Income Tax Expense, continued
The Company’s provision for federal income taxes decreased $67,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 due to decreased income before taxes in 2006. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was 24.1% of income before tax as compared to 26.3% for the same period in 2005. The difference between the effective tax rates and the federal corporate income tax rate of 34% is attributable to the low income housing credits available to the Bank from the investment in the limited partnership as well as fluctuation of permanent book and tax differences such as non-taxable income and non-deductible expenses.
LIQUIDITY
The Bank’s liquidity, represented by cash, overnight funds and investments, is a product of our operating, investing, and financing activities. The Bank’s primary sources of funds are deposits, amortization, prepayments and maturities of outstanding loans, and funds provided from operations. While scheduled payments from the amortization of loans are a relatively predictable source of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. The Bank also generates cash through borrowings. The Bank utilizes Federal Home Loan Bank advances to leverage its capital base and provide funds for its lending and investment activities, and to enhance its interest rate risk management.
Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of business management. Excess liquidity is generally invested in short-term investments such as overnight deposits. On a longer-term basis, the Bank maintains a strategy of investing in various investments and lending products. The Bank uses its sources of funds primarily to meet its ongoing commitments, to pay maturing certificates of deposit and savings withdrawals and to fund loan commitments. Certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in one year or less at June 30, 2006 totaled $69.9 million. Management believes that a significant portion of these certificates of deposit will remain with the Bank provided the Bank pays a rate of interest that is competitive both in the local and national markets.
If necessary, additional funding sources include additional deposits and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. Deposits can be obtained in the local market area and from out of market sources; however, this may require the Bank to offer interest rates higher than those of the competition. At June 30, 2006 and based on current collateral levels, the Bank could borrow an additional $20.3 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank at prevailing interest rates. This borrowing capacity can be increased in the future if the Bank pledges additional collateral to the Federal Home Loan Bank. The Company anticipates that it will continue to have sufficient funds, through deposits and borrowings, to meet its current commitments.
The Bank’s total cash and cash equivalents decreased by $1.8 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2006 compared to a $3.6 million increase for the same period in 2005. The primary sources of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were $10.0 million in proceeds from FHLB advances, $7.8 million in proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans, and a $7.0 million increase in deposits compared to $1.0 million in proceeds from FHLB advances, $12.0 million in proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans and a $1.7 million increase in deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Maturities of available for sale securities net of purchases provided $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 whereas the same activity used $4.7 million for the same period in 2005. The primary uses of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were $15.8 million of new loan originations exceeding principal collections, $9.0 million in repayments of FHLB advances and $7.6 million in new loans originated for sale compared to $5.2 million in repayments of FHLB advances and $12.3 million in new loans originated for sale in 2005. Management expects its primary source of funds to be new deposit balances and its primary use of funds to be growth in loan balances.
12
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The Corporation has certain obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts. At June 30, 2006, the aggregate contractual obligations and commitments are:
Contractual Obligations | | Payments Due by Period |
| | | | | | Less than | | | 1-3 | | | 3-5 | | | After |
| | | Total | | | 1 year | | | years | | | years | | | 5 years |
| | (Dollars in Thousands) |
Certificates of deposit | | $ | 102,719 | | $ | 69,914 | | $ | 24,819 | | $ | 7,945 | | $ | 41 |
FHLB advances | | | 60,592 | | | 13,615 | | | 26,299 | | | 7,328 | | | 13,350 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 163,311 | | $ | 83,529 | | $ | 51,118 | | $ | 15,273 | | $ | 13,391 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Commitments | | Amount of commitment expiration per period | |
| | | | Less than | | 1-3 | | 3-5 | | After | |
| | Total | | 1 year | | years | | years | | 5 years | |
| | (Dollars in Thousands) | |
Commitments to grant loans | | $ | 2,842 | | $ | 2,842 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
Unfunded commitments under HELOCs | | | 18,360 | | | 1,341 | | | 4,301 | | | 3,931 | | | 8,787 | |
Unfunded commitments under Commercial LOCs | | | 1,634 | | | 1,494 | | | — | | | 140 | | | — | |
Letters of credit | | | 64 | | | 64 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 22,900 | | $ | 5,741 | | $ | 4,301 | | $ | 4,071 | | $ | 8,787 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commitments to grant loans are governed by the Bank’s credit underwriting standards, as established by the Bank’s Loan Policy. The Bank’s policy is to grant Home Equity Lines of Credits (HELOCs) for periods of up to 15 years.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements. As of June 30, 2006, the Bank met the regulatory standards to be classified as “well capitalized.” The Bank’s regulatory capital ratios as of June 30, 2006 were as follows: Tier 1 leverage ratio 9.98%, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio 13.18%; and total risk-based capital, 14.39%. The regulatory capital requirements to be considered well capitalized are 5.0%, 6.0%, and 10.0%, respectively. Management considers the Bank’s capital to be adequate to support anticipated growth and does not anticipate needing to seek additional capital in the foreseeable future.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The Corporation’s primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk (“IRR”). Interest rate risk refers to the risk that changes in market interest rates might adversely affect the Corporation’s net interest income or the economic value of its portfolio of assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet contracts. Interest rate risk is primarily the result of an imbalance between the price sensitivity of the Corporation’s assets and its liabilities (including off-balance sheet contracts). Such imbalances can be caused by differences in the maturity, repricing and coupon characteristics of assets and liabilities, and options, such as loan prepayment options, interest rate caps and floors, and deposit withdrawal options. These imbalances, in combination with movement in interest rates, will alter the pattern of the Corporation’s cash inflows and outflows, affecting the earnings and economic value of the Corporation.
The Corporation’s primary tool for assessing IRR is a model that uses scenario analysis to evaluate the IRR risk exposure of the Bank by estimating the sensitivity of the Bank’s portfolios of assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet contracts to changes in market interest rates. To measure the sensitivity of the Bank’s NPV to changes in interest rates, the NPV model estimates what would happen to the economic value of each type of asset, liability, and off-balance sheet contract under six different interest rate scenarios. The model estimates the NPV that would result following instantaneous, parallel shifts in the Treasury yield curve of -300, -200, -100, +100, +200, +300 basis points. The levels, from least risk to most risk, are; minimal, moderate, significant, high and imminent threat. Data from the model, as of June 30, 2006, March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 indicates that the Bank’s IRR level remains minimal.
13
An evaluation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of June 30, 2006, was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of the Corporation’s senior management. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures as currently in effect are effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Corporation’s management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2006, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
The Corporation intends to continually review and evaluate the design and effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures and to improve its controls and procedures over time and to correct any deficiencies that it may discover in the future. The goal is to ensure that senior management has timely access to all material financial and non-financial information concerning the Corporation’s business. While the Corporation believes the present design of its disclosure controls and procedures is effective to achieve its goal, future events affecting its business may cause the Corporation to modify its disclosure controls and procedures.
14
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
The Corporation and the Bank are from time-to-time involved in legal proceedings arising out of, and incidental to, their business. Management, based on its review with counsel of all actions and proceedings affecting the Corporation and the Bank, has concluded that the aggregate loss, if any, resulting from the disposition of these proceedings should not be material to the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Corporation. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None
Item 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
Not applicable
Item 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
| 1. | Election of Directors with terms ending in 2009 |
| Stephen M. Ross | For: 2,316,882 | Withheld: 116,453 |
| Martin M. Mitchell | For: 2,330,695 | Withheld: 102,640 | |
| Gordon L. Welch | For: 2,317,282 | Withheld: 116,053 |
| | | | | | |
The following are the names of the directors (and the remaining terms) whose terms continued after the meeting:
| Craig W. Dally | Term Expires: 2007 |
| Donald L. Denney | Term Expires: 2007 | |
| Richard L. Dobbins | Term Expires: 2007 | |
| Harold A. Adamson | Term Expires: 2008 | |
| Lauren L. Bracy | Term Expires: 2008 | |
| James R. Vozar | Term Expires: 2008 | |
| | | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of appointment of Plante & Moran, LLP as independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006: |
| For: 2,294,072 | Against: 132,292 | Abstain: 6,071 |
Not applicable
See the index to exhibits.
15
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| MONARCH COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Date: August 3, 2006 | By: /s/ Donald L. Denney |
| Donald L. Denney |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| |
| |
Date: August 3, 2006 | And: /s/ Ralph A. Micalizzi, Jr. |
| Ralph A. Micalizzi, Jr. |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
| and Treasurer |
16
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. | Description of Exhibit |
10.1 | Management Continuity Agreement with Eric C. Cook (Incorporated by reference from current report on Form 8-K filed April 26, 2006). |
17