UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2007
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File No. 333-103749
MAINE & MARITIMES CORPORATION
A Maine Corporation
I.R.S. Employer Identification No. 30-0155348
209 STATE STREET, PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04769
(207) 760-2499
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x. No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o. Accelerated filer o. Non-accelerated filer x.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o. No x.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of August 10, 2007
Common Stock, $7.00 par value – 1,677,430 shares
Glossary of Terms |
|
|
|
|
|
AMEX |
| American Stock Exchange |
Ashford |
| Ashford Investments Inc. |
CES |
| Competitive Energy Supplier |
Cornwallis |
| Cornwallis Court Developments Ltd |
DSM |
| Demand-Side Management |
EA |
| Energy Atlantic, LLC |
EBIT |
| Earnings Before Interest and Taxes |
FAME |
| Finance Authority of Maine |
FERC |
| Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
FIN |
| FASB Interpretation Number |
HCI |
| HCI Systems Asset Management, LLC |
MAM |
| Maine & Maritimes Corporation |
MCW |
| MCW Consultants Ltd |
Me&NB |
| Maine & New Brunswick Electrical Power Company, Ltd |
Mecel |
| Mecel Properties Ltd |
MEPCO |
| Maine Electric Power Company, Inc. |
MPS |
| Maine Public Service Company |
MPUC |
| Maine Public Utilities Commission |
MTI |
| Maricor Technologies, Inc. |
MW |
| Megawatt |
MWH |
| Megawatt hour |
NOI |
| Notice of Inquiry |
OATT |
| Open Access Transmission Tariff |
OCI |
| Other Comprehensive Income |
PCB |
| Poly Chlorinated Bi-phenol |
PPA |
| Power Purchase Agreement |
RES |
| RES Engineering, Inc. |
SFAS |
| Statement of Financial Accounting Standards |
SOS |
| Standard Offer Service |
T&D |
| Transmission and distribution |
TMG |
| The Maricor Group |
TMGC |
| The Maricor Group, Canada Ltd |
TMGNE |
| The Maricor Group New England |
WS |
| Wheelabrator-Sherman |
2
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
See the following exhibits: Maine & Maritimes Corporation (“MAM” or the “Company”) and subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements, including (1) an unaudited statement of consolidated operations for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007, and for the corresponding period of the preceding year; (2) an unaudited statement of consolidated cash flows for the period January 1 (beginning of the fiscal year) through June 30, 2007, and for the corresponding period of the preceding year; (3) an unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007; (4) an audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, the end of Maine & Maritimes Corporation’s preceding fiscal year; and (5) an unaudited statement of consolidated common shareholders’ equity for the period January 1 (beginning of the fiscal year) through June 30, 2007.
In the opinion of Management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements present fairly the financial position of the Company and its Subsidiaries at June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006; the results of their operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006; and their cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007, and 2006.
MAM is the parent holding company for the following wholly-owned subsidiaries:
1. Maine Public Service Company (“MPS”) and its wholly-owned inactive Canadian subsidiary Maine & New Brunswick Electrical Power Company, Ltd (“Me&NB”);
2. Energy Atlantic, LLC (“EA”), an inactive subsidiary;
3. The Maricor Group (“TMG”) and its wholly-owned United States subsidiary The Maricor Group New England (“TMGNE”) and TMG’s wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary The Maricor Group, Canada Ltd (“TMGC”), all of which are classified as discontinued operations. As described later in this document, substantially all of the assets of TMGC were sold in June, 2007.
4. Maricor Technologies, Inc. (“MTI”), a wholly-owned United States subsidiary classified as discontinued operations. MAM divested of MTI’s assets and terminated its operations as of April 13, 2007. The corporation was dissolved on June 28, 2007.
In addition to these wholly-owned subsidiaries, MAM is a 50% owner of Maricor Properties Ltd, (“Maricor Properties”), a Canadian company formerly wholly-owned by MAM, and its wholly-owned Canadian subsidiaries Cornwallis Court Developments, Ltd (“Cornwallis”) and Mecel Properties Ltd (“Mecel”). MAM retained 100% of the economic rights and obligations of Mecel when it sold 50% of Maricor Properties. Mecel is presented in these financial statements as discontinued operations, while the other components are reported under the equity method. As of March 21, 2007, MAM also became a 50% owner of Maricor Ashford, an inactive joint venture with Ashford Investments Inc., previously jointly owned by Maricor Properties and Ashford Investments Inc.
Maine & Maritimes Corporation and Subsidiaries
3
* Indicates inactive companies
** Companies classified as Discontinued Operations in these financial statements.
General Descriptions of the Parent Company and its Subsidiaries:
· Maine & Maritimes Corporation is a holding company incorporated in the State of Maine, and is the ultimate parent company for all business segments. MAM maintains investments in a regulated electric transmission and distribution utility operating within the State of Maine, United States of America, classified for financial reporting purposes as continuing operations. MAM also has investments in a mechanical, electrical and plumbing/fire protection engineering company in Boston, and real estate investments in Canada at June 30, 2007. These operations were reclassified for financial reporting purposes to assets held for sale. MAM is headquartered in Presque Isle, Maine.
· Maine Public Service Company is a regulated electric transmission and distribution utility serving all of Aroostook County and a portion of Penobscot County in northern Maine. Since March 1, 2000, the date retail electric competition in Maine commenced, customers in MPS’s service territory have been purchasing energy from suppliers other than MPS. This energy comes from Competitive Electricity Suppliers (“CES”) or, if customers are unable or do not wish to choose a competitive supplier, the Standard Offer Service (“SOS”) provider. SOS providers are determined through a bid process conducted by the Maine Public Utilities Commission (“MPUC”). MPS provides the transportation through its transmission and distribution wires infrastructure. Its service area covers approximately 3,600 square miles, with a population of 72,000. The utility is regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) and the MPUC. MPS is headquartered in Presque Isle, Maine.
Electric sales in the Company’s territory are seasonal, and the Company’s results of operations reflect this seasonal nature. The highest usage occurs during the five heating season months, from November through March, due to heating-related requirements and shorter daylight hours. The rate year is divided into two periods, with higher rates in place in the winter months to encourage conservation. Also, due to the climate in the northern Maine area, the majority of MPS’s construction program is completed during the spring, summer and fall months.
· Maine & New Brunswick Electrical Power Company, Ltd is an inactive Canadian subsidiary of MPS, which, prior to deregulation and generation divestiture, owned MPS’s Canadian electric generation assets. Me&NB was incorporated in 1903 under the laws of the Province of New Brunswick, Canada.
· The Maricor Group is a facilities engineering and solutions company providing mechanical, electrical and plumbing/fire protection engineering consulting design services. TMG operates primarily within the New England region of the United States through its subsidiary The Maricor Group New England (“TMGNE”). TMG was formed in November 2003, and is headquartered in Presque Isle, Maine, with an office in Boston, Massachusetts. MAM has partially divested its TMG operations through sales of substantially all operating assets of its Canadian operations, as part of an overall shift in strategy described more fully in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” of MAM’s 2006 Form 10-K and updated in the first and second quarter 10-Q filings for 2007. As part of this strategy, MAM intends to sell or wind down the operations of TMGNE.
· Maricor Properties Ltd, 50% owned by MAM, is a Canadian real estate development, redevelopment and investment company. Maricor Properties Ltd was organized on May 28, 2004, in Nova Scotia, Canada, and acquired Mecel Properties on June 1, 2004. Maricor Properties purchased a building in Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada, in August 2004, and Cornwallis Court Developments Ltd, a wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary, on October 7, 2005. On June 30, 2006, Maricor Properties issued stock to Ashford Investments Inc. (“Ashford”), resulting in 50% ownership for both MAM and Ashford. Prior to this stock issuance, Maricor Properties was a wholly-owned subsidiary of MAM. Ashford Investments is an Atlantic Canadian real estate development, investment and management firm which provides management services to Maricor Properties and its subsidiaries. As part of the corporate strategy, MAM will seek to divest its 50% share of Maricor Properties.
· Mecel Properties Ltd is a Canadian subsidiary of Maricor Properties Ltd and currently owns an office building in Halifax, Nova Scotia. It was acquired by Maricor Properties on June 1, 2004, in conjunction with the acquisition by TMGC of its Halifax practice group. Under the terms of the sale of stock of Maricor Properties to Ashford, MAM retained 100% of the economic ownership of this subsidiary, with the expectation that either 50% of Mecel would be purchased by Ashford or that Mecel would be transferred to TMGC at a later date. As of June 30, 2007, the economic ownership of Mecel remained solely owned by MAM. MAM is seeking to divest its ownership of Mecel Properties.
· Maricor Technologies, Inc., formed on February 14, 2005, developed information technology and software products for sustainable governance of facilities, infrastructure and buildings. MAM divested its MTI assets and terminated operations as of April 13, 2007.
· Energy Atlantic, LLC is a licensed, but currently inactive, CES of retail electricity, and is classified as discontinued operations.
4
MAINE & MARITIMES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Statements of Consolidated Operations (Unaudited)
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
(In thousands of dollars except shares and per share amounts) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Regulated Revenues |
| $ | 7,951 |
| $ | 7,414 |
| $ | 18,866 |
| $ | 17,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Regulated Operation & Maintenance |
| 3,168 |
| 3,497 |
| 6,545 |
| 7,241 |
| ||||
Unregulated Operation & Maintenance (1) |
| 355 |
| 179 |
| 847 |
| 616 |
| ||||
Depreciation |
| 697 |
| 730 |
| 1,408 |
| 1,445 |
| ||||
Amortization of Stranded Costs |
| 2,647 |
| 2,568 |
| 5,451 |
| 5,378 |
| ||||
Amortization |
| 61 |
| (50 | ) | 116 |
| 29 |
| ||||
Taxes Other Than Income |
| 441 |
| 437 |
| 885 |
| 937 |
| ||||
Provision for Income Taxes—Regulated |
| 320 |
| 43 |
| 1,637 |
| 793 |
| ||||
Benefit of Income Taxes—Unregulated (1) |
| (181 | ) | (113 | ) | (422 | ) | (316 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total Operating Expenses |
| 7,508 |
| 7,291 |
| 16,467 |
| 16,123 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating Income |
| 443 |
| 123 |
| 2,399 |
| 1,342 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other Income (Deductions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Equity in Income of Associated Companies |
| 39 |
| 199 |
| (33 | ) | 127 |
| ||||
Interest and Dividend Income |
| 6 |
| 2 |
| 13 |
| 8 |
| ||||
Provision for Income Taxes |
| (4 | ) | — |
| (5 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||
Other—Net |
| (18 | ) | (8 | ) | (43 | ) | (48 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
| 23 |
| 193 |
| (68 | ) | 65 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income Before Interest Charges |
| 466 |
| 316 |
| 2,331 |
| 1,407 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Long-Term Debt and Notes Payable |
| 722 |
| 727 |
| 1,483 |
| 1,435 |
| ||||
Less Stranded Costs Carrying Charge |
| (442 | ) | (414 | ) | (898 | ) | (815 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
| 280 |
| 313 |
| 585 |
| 620 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Income from Continuing Operations |
| 186 |
| 3 |
| 1,746 |
| 787 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Estimated Loss on Sales of Discontinued Operations |
| (362 | ) | — |
| (362 | ) | — |
| ||||
Loss from Operations |
| (573 | ) | (541 | ) | (923 | ) | (971 | ) | ||||
Income Tax Benefit |
| 372 |
| 228 |
| 513 |
| 407 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Loss from Discontinued Operations |
| (563 | ) | (313 | ) | (772 | ) | (564 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net (Loss) Income Available for Common Stockholders |
| $ | (377 | ) | $ | (310 | ) | $ | 974 |
| $ | 223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding |
| 1,677,187 |
| 1,637,643 |
| 1,662,005 |
| 1,637,427 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic Earnings Per Share of Common Stock From Continuing Operations |
| $ | 0.11 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1.05 |
| $ | 0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic Loss Per Share of Common Stock From Discontinued Operations |
| (0.33 | ) | (0.19 | ) | (0.46 | ) | (0.34 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic (Loss) Earnings Per Share of Common Stock From Net (Loss) Income |
| $ | (0.22 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.59 |
| $ | 0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share of Common Stock From Continuing Operations |
| $ | 0.11 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1.04 |
| $ | 0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Diluted Loss Per Share of Common Stock From Discontinued Operations |
| (0.33 | ) | (0.19 | ) | (0.46 | ) | (0.34 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share of Common Stock From Net (Loss) Income |
| $ | (0.22 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.58 |
| $ | 0.13 |
|
(1) Unregulated operation and maintenance expense and income tax benefit included in continuing operations is the activity of the holding company, including corporate costs directly associated with unregulated operations and common costs not allocated to the regulated utility.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
MAINE & MARITIMES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
| Six Months Ended |
| ||||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||
Cash Flow From Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Income |
| $ | 974 |
| $ | 223 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operations: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation |
| 1,408 |
| 1,445 |
| ||
Amortization of Intangibles |
| 116 |
| 29 |
| ||
Amortization of Seabrook |
| 555 |
| 555 |
| ||
Amortization of Cancelled Transmission Plant |
| 127 |
| — |
| ||
Deferred Income Taxes—Net |
| 791 |
| 656 |
| ||
Deferred Investment Tax Credits |
| (10 | ) | (12 | ) | ||
Change in Deferred Regulatory and Debt Issuance Costs |
| 2,229 |
| (2,918 | ) | ||
Amortization of W/S Upfront Payment |
| — |
| 725 |
| ||
Change in Benefit Obligations |
| (294 | ) | 280 |
| ||
Gain from Sale of Stock in Subsidiary |
| — |
| (429 | ) | ||
Change in Current Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts Receivable and Unbilled Revenue |
| 592 |
| 1,467 |
| ||
Other Current Assets |
| (359 | ) | 29 |
| ||
Accounts Payable |
| (1,852 | ) | (223 | ) | ||
Other Current Liabilities |
| 512 |
| 797 |
| ||
Other—Net |
| 1,612 |
| 390 |
| ||
Adjustments to Operating Cash Flows from Continuing Operations |
| 6,401 |
| 3,014 |
| ||
Operating Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations |
| (894 | ) | (1,215 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Cash Flow Provided By Operating Activities |
| 5,507 |
| 1,799 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flow From Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Retirements of Long-Term Debt |
| (1,595 | ) | (1,190 | ) | ||
Additions of Long-Term Debt |
| 3,499 |
| — |
| ||
Short-Term Debt (Repayments) Borrowings, Net |
| (4,970 | ) | 745 |
| ||
Short-Term Debt Repayments of Discontinued Operations |
| (1,000 | ) | — |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Cash Flow Used For Financing Activities |
| (4,066 | ) | (445 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flow From Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Paid for Stock Contingencies from Acquisition Agreements |
| (187 | ) | (244 | ) | ||
Gain from Sale of Stock of Subsidiary |
| — |
| 429 |
| ||
Cash Received from Sale of Discontinued Operations |
| 1,821 |
| — |
| ||
Change in Restricted Investments |
| (2 | ) | (3 | ) | ||
Investment in Fixed Assets |
| (2,557 | ) | (1,554 | ) | ||
Stock Redemption from Associated Company |
| — |
| 200 |
| ||
Investing Activities of Discontinued Operations |
| — |
| (248 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Cash Flow Used For Investing Activities |
| (925 | ) | (1,420 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| 516 |
| (66 | ) | ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
| 898 |
| 273 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
| $ | 1,414 |
| $ | 207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Paid During the Period for: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest |
| $ | 1,499 |
| $ | 1,497 |
|
Income Taxes |
| $ | 153 |
| $ | 52 |
|
Non-Cash Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fair Market Value of Stock Issued to Directors |
| $ | 12 |
| $ | 12 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
MAINE & MARITIMES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
| June 30, |
| December 31, |
| ||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||
|
| (Unaudited) |
| (Audited) |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Plant |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Electric Plant in Service |
| $ | 101,910 |
| $ | 101,085 |
|
Non-Utility Plant |
| 3 |
| 3 |
| ||
Less Accumulated Depreciation |
| (43,129 | ) | (41,948 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Plant in Service |
| 58,784 |
| 59,140 |
| ||
Construction Work-in-Progress |
| 1,661 |
| 499 |
| ||
Total |
| 60,445 |
| 59,639 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Investments in Associated Companies |
| 1,207 |
| 1,500 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Plant and Investments in Associated Companies |
| 61,652 |
| 61,139 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| 1,414 |
| 898 |
| ||
Accounts Receivable (less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $116 in 2007 and $114 in 2006) |
| 6,459 |
| 6,709 |
| ||
Accounts Receivable from Associated Companies |
| 327 |
| 281 |
| ||
Unbilled Revenue - Utility |
| 761 |
| 1,150 |
| ||
Inventory |
| 1,116 |
| 646 |
| ||
Prepayments |
| 161 |
| 273 |
| ||
Current Assets of Discontinued Operations |
| 4,921 |
| 8,658 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total |
| 15,159 |
| 18,615 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Regulatory Assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Uncollected Maine Yankee Decommissioning Costs |
| 6,241 |
| 7,743 |
| ||
Recoverable Seabrook Costs |
| 10,004 |
| 10,559 |
| ||
Regulatory Assets—Deferred Income Taxes |
| 5,709 |
| 5,923 |
| ||
Regulatory Assets—Post-Retirement Medical Benefits |
| 2,193 |
| 2,205 |
| ||
Deferred Fuel and Purchased Energy Costs |
| 32,720 |
| 34,689 |
| ||
Cancelled Transmission Plant |
| 381 |
| 508 |
| ||
Unamortized Premium on Early Retirement of Debt |
| 997 |
| 1,100 |
| ||
Deferred Regulatory Costs |
| 1,561 |
| 1,677 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total |
| 59,806 |
| 64,404 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs |
| 408 |
| 502 |
| ||
Restricted Investments (at cost, which approximates market) |
| 2,460 |
| 2,458 |
| ||
Other Assets |
| 1,274 |
| 1,049 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total |
| 4,142 |
| 4,009 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Assets |
| $ | 140,759 |
| $ | 148,167 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
MAINE & MARITIMES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
| June 30, |
| December 31, |
| ||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||
|
| (Unaudited) |
| (Audited) |
| ||
Capitalization (see accompanying statement): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Shareholders’ Equity |
| $ | 42,970 |
| $ | 41,527 |
|
Long-Term Debt |
| 27,733 |
| 27,840 |
| ||
Long-Term Debt of Discontinued Operations |
| 2,072 |
| 2,182 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total |
| 72,775 |
| 71,549 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-Term Debt Due Within One Year |
| 4,696 |
| 2,685 |
| ||
Notes Payable to Banks |
| 6,000 |
| 11,970 |
| ||
Accounts Payable |
| 3,584 |
| 5,018 |
| ||
Accounts Payable—Associated Companies |
| 250 |
| 247 |
| ||
Accrued Employee Benefits |
| 1,003 |
| 1,424 |
| ||
Customer Deposits |
| 144 |
| 149 |
| ||
Taxes Accrued |
| 563 |
| 7 |
| ||
Interest Accrued |
| 229 |
| 246 |
| ||
Other Current Liabilities |
| 7 |
| 30 |
| ||
Current Liabilities of Discontinued Operations |
| 1,014 |
| 3,195 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total |
| 17,490 |
| 24,971 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accrued Removal Obligations |
| 5,497 |
| 5,572 |
| ||
Carrying Value of Interest Rate Hedge |
| 956 |
| 1,636 |
| ||
Uncollected Maine Yankee Decommissioning Costs |
| 6,241 |
| 7,743 |
| ||
Other Regulatory Liabilities |
| 329 |
| 382 |
| ||
Deferred Income Taxes |
| 26,438 |
| 26,360 |
| ||
Accrued Postretirement Benefits and Pension Costs |
| 8,325 |
| 8,631 |
| ||
Investment Tax Credits |
| 72 |
| 81 |
| ||
Miscellaneous |
| 2,636 |
| 1,242 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total |
| 50,494 |
| 51,647 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commitments, Contingencies, and Regulatory Matters (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Capitalization and Liabilities |
| $ | 140,759 |
| $ | 148,167 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
8
MAINE & MARITIMES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Statement of Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
(In thousands of dollars, except share information)
|
|
|
|
|
| Common |
| Preferred |
|
|
| Accumulated |
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
| Shares Issued and |
| Par Value |
|
|
| Par Value |
|
|
|
|
| Other Comprehensive |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| Outstanding |
| Issued |
| Paid-In |
| Issued ($0.01/ |
| Paid-In |
| Retained |
| Income |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| Common |
| Preferred |
| ($7/Share) |
| Capital |
| Share) |
| Capital |
| Earnings |
| (Loss) |
| Total |
| |||||||
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
| 1,638,379 |
| 9,500 |
| $ | 11,469 |
| $ | 1,254 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 950 |
| $ | 28,266 |
| $ | (412 | ) | $ | 41,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Common Stock Issued |
| 730 |
|
|
| 5 |
| 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Conversion of Preferred Shares |
| 38,078 |
| (9,500 | ) | 267 |
| 683 |
|
|
| (950 | ) |
|
|
|
| — |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Stock Contingency from Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (187 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (187 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 974 |
|
|
| 974 |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Changes in Value of Foreign Exchange Translation Loss, Net of Tax Benefit of $160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 239 |
| 239 |
| |||||||
Unrealized Loss on Investments Available for Sale, Net of Tax Benefit of $2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (3 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Hedge, Net of Tax Provision of $272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 408 |
| 408 |
| |||||||
Total Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 644 |
| |||||||
Total Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,618 |
| |||||||
Balance, June 30, 2007 |
| 1,677,187 |
| — |
| $ | 11,741 |
| $ | 1,757 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 29,240 |
| $ | 232 |
| $ | 42,970 |
|
MAM had five million shares of $7 per share common stock authorized, with 1,677,187 and 1,638,379 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, respectively. At December 31, 2006, MAM had 500,000 shares of $0.01 per share preferred stock authorized, with 9,500 shares issued and outstanding. There were no preferred shares issued or outstanding at June 30, 2007 as these shares were converted to common.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
9
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Maine & Maritimes Corporation and the following wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliates:
1. Maine Public Service Company and its wholly-owned inactive Canadian subsidiary Maine & New Brunswick Electrical Power Company, Ltd (“Me&NB”);
2. The Maricor Group and its wholly-owned United States subsidiary The Maricor Group New England and wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary The Maricor Group, Canada Ltd, classified as discontinued operations. As described later in this document, substantially all of the assets of TMGC were sold in June, 2007.
3. Maricor Technologies, Inc., a wholly-owned United States subsidiary, classified as discontinued operations. MAM divested of MTI’s assets and terminated its operations as of April 13, 2007; and
4. Energy Atlantic, LLC, an inactive subsidiary.
MAM is also a 50% owner of Maricor Properties Ltd, a Canadian company formerly wholly-owned by MAM, and its wholly-owned Canadian subsidiaries, Cornwallis Court Developments Ltd and Mecel Properties Ltd. MAM retained 100% “economic ownership” of Mecel with the sale of 50% of the rest of Maricor Properties in June 2006. MAM is a 50% owner of Maricor Ashford Ltd, a joint venture with Ashford Investments Inc. MAM is not the primary beneficiary of Maricor Properties under FIN 46(R), and, therefore, its investment in Maricor Properties, excluding Mecel, is accounted for under the equity method in these financial statements. Because MAM remained primary beneficiary of Mecel, this entity is consolidated in these financial statements.
MAM, a utility holding company organized effective June 30, 2003, owns all of the common stock of the above primary subsidiaries. Primary subsidiaries, including MPS, TMG, and Maricor Properties Ltd own all the common stock of their secondary subsidiaries. MAM is listed on the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) under the symbol “MAM.”
All inter-company transactions between MAM and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation.
Accounting Policies
The Company’s accounting policies are those disclosed in its 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K and its March 31, 2007 Form 10-Q, which are hereby incorporated by this reference.
Reclassifications
The reclassification of the unregulated engineering services segment and the operations of Mecel from continuing operations to discontinued operations have been made to the 2006 financial statement amounts in order to conform to the 2007 presentation. Further, the unregulated real estate segment reported in the 2006 financial statements, excluding Mecel, has been reclassified to the equity method, instead of consolidated, also to conform to the 2007 presentation.
2. INCOME TAXES
A summary of Federal, Canadian and State income taxes charged (credited) to income is presented below. For accounting and ratemaking purposes, income tax provisions (benefits) included in “Operating Expenses” reflect taxes applicable to revenues and expenses allowable for ratemaking purposes on MPS regulated activities and unregulated activities for MAM, TMG, Mecel and MTI. The tax effect of items not included in rate base or normal operating activities is allocated as “Other Income (Deductions).”
The foreign income taxes include only the Canadian income taxes for the Canadian operations of TMG, Maine & New Brunswick and Mecel.
10
|
| For the Quarter Ended June 30, |
| For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| ||||||||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Current income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Federal |
| $ | — |
| $ | (273 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | (45 | ) |
State |
| — |
| (95 | ) | — |
| (44 | ) | ||||
Foreign |
| 4 |
| 123 |
| 8 |
| 42 |
| ||||
Total current income taxes |
| 4 |
| (245 | ) | 8 |
| (47 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Federal |
| (281 | ) | (54 | ) | 366 |
| 126 |
| ||||
State |
| 53 |
| 7 |
| 343 |
| 25 |
| ||||
Total deferred income taxes |
| (228 | ) | (47 | ) | 709 |
| 151 |
| ||||
Investment credits, net |
| (5 | ) | (6 | ) | (10 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
Total income taxes |
| $ | (229 | ) | $ | (298 | ) | $ | 707 |
| $ | 92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Allocated to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
- Regulated |
| $ | 320 |
| $ | 43 |
| $ | 1,637 |
| $ | 793 |
|
- Unregulated |
| (181 | ) | (113 | ) | (422 | ) | (316 | ) | ||||
Subtotal |
| 139 |
| (70 | ) | 1,215 |
| 477 |
| ||||
Discontinued Operations |
| (372 | ) | (228 | ) | (513 | ) | (407 | ) | ||||
Total Operating |
| (233 | ) | (298 | ) | 702 |
| 70 |
| ||||
Other income |
| 4 |
| — |
| 5 |
| 22 |
| ||||
Total |
| $ | (229 | ) | $ | (298 | ) | $ | 707 |
| $ | 92 |
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2007, and 2006, the effective income tax rates were 42.1% and 29.1%, respectively. The principal reasons for the effective tax rates differing from the US federal income tax rate are equity earnings in joint venture companies and investment tax credit amortization.
The Company has not accrued U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of ME&NB, as the withholding taxes due on the distribution of any remaining amount would be principally offset by foreign tax credits. No dividends were received from ME&NB in the first six months of 2007 or 2006.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109.” This statement clarifies the criteria that an individual tax position must satisfy for some or all of the benefits of that position to be recognized in a company’s financial statements. FIN 48 requires a tax position to be more likely than not in order for the position to be recognized in the financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48. There were no adjustments required to the reported tax benefits at January 1, or June 30, 2007, from the adoption of this standard. Further, the Company does not expect that the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly in the next twelve months. As of January 1, and June 30, 2007, the Company has accrued no interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
The Company is currently subject to audit by the Internal Revenue Service, Canadian Revenue Authority and certain State income tax authorities for the calendar years 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006.
As required by SFAS No. 109 and FIN 48, Management of the Company has evaluated the positive and negative evidence bearing upon the realizability of the Company’s deferred tax assets, which consist principally of the estimated losses on the divestiture of unregulated operations, pension and post-retirement benefits and accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”) — interest rate hedge. For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, and the year ended December 31, 2006, Management evaluated the deferred tax asset valuation allowance and determined that no adjustment was needed.
The following summarizes accumulated deferred income tax (assets) and liabilities established on temporary differences under SFAS 109 as of June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006:
11
(In thousands of dollars) |
| June 30, 2007 |
| December 31, 2006 |
| ||
Seabrook |
| $ | 5,430 |
| $ | 5,737 |
|
Property |
| 9,597 |
| 9,526 |
| ||
Flexible pricing revenue |
| 500 |
| 596 |
| ||
Deferred fuel |
| 13,054 |
| 13,839 |
| ||
Pension and post-retirement benefits |
| (1,935 | ) | (1,992 | ) | ||
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards of Continuing Operations |
| — |
| (1,055 | ) | ||
Other Comprehensive Income |
| (327 | ) | (602 | ) | ||
Other |
| 119 |
| 311 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Liability from Continuing Operations |
| $ | 26,438 |
| $ | 26,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Goodwill Impairment Loss |
| (1,018 | ) | (1,018 | ) | ||
Estimated Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations |
| (2,085 | ) | (2,485 | ) | ||
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards of Discontinued Operations |
| (1,356 | ) | (1,204 | ) | ||
Amortization of Goodwill |
| 375 |
| 375 |
| ||
Other Comprehensive Income |
| 436 |
| 287 |
| ||
Other |
| (17 | ) | (14 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Asset from Discontinued Operations |
| $ | (3,665 | ) | $ | (4,059 | ) |
Net Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Liability |
| $ | 22,773 |
| $ | 22,301 |
|
3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The Maricor Group
As described in the MAM 2006 Form 10-K, the Company has embarked on a new strategic course expected to result in the divestiture of substantially all of the assets reported as the Unregulated Engineering Services operating segment within 2007. As a result, the operations for this segment have been reclassified to discontinued operations. During the second quarter of 2007, MAM divested substantially all of the assets and liabilities of The Maricor Group, Canada Ltd. Refer to Note 10 for more information regarding this sale.
The net loss for unregulated engineering services is composed of the following:
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| |||||||||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Loss From Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating Revenue |
| $ | 625 |
| $ | 1,425 |
| $ | 2,292 |
| $ | 2,773 |
|
Third Party Expenses |
| (937 | ) | (1,643 | ) | (2,684 | ) | (3,175 | ) | ||||
Intercompany Expenses |
| (29 | ) | (34 | ) | (62 | ) | (68 | ) | ||||
Loss from Operations |
| (341 | ) | (252 | ) | (454 | ) | (470 | ) | ||||
Additional Loss from Sale of Assets |
| (362 | ) | — |
| (362 | ) | — |
| ||||
Benefit of Income Taxes |
| 287 |
| 129 |
| 352 |
| 239 |
| ||||
Net Loss — Unregulated Engineering Services |
| $ | (416 | ) | $ | (123 | ) | $ | (464 | ) | $ | (231 | ) |
12
The unregulated engineering services balance sheets as of June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, were as follows:
| June 30, |
| December 31, |
| |||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
| $ | — |
| $ | 202 |
|
Accounts Receivable, Net |
| 401 |
| 1,715 |
| ||
Unbilled Contract Revenue |
| 96 |
| 1,155 |
| ||
Other Current Assets |
| 10 |
| 72 |
| ||
Current Assets |
| 507 |
| 3,144 |
| ||
Fixed Assets, Net of Depreciation |
| 49 |
| 226 |
| ||
Intangible Assets and Goodwill |
| — |
| 162 |
| ||
Income Taxes Receivable |
| 1,359 |
| 875 |
| ||
Deferred Tax Assets |
| 2,312 |
| 2,495 |
| ||
Long-Term and Other Assets |
| 3,720 |
| 3,758 |
| ||
Total Assets |
| $ | 4,227 |
| $ | 6,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Shareholder’s Equity and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Shareholder’s (Deficit) Equity |
| $ | (4,952 | ) | $ | (4,646 | ) |
Notes Payable to Banks |
| — |
| 1,000 |
| ||
Accounts Payable and Accrued Employee Benefits |
| 768 |
| 1,596 |
| ||
Intercompany Accounts Payable |
| 3,008 |
| 1,673 |
| ||
Unearned Revenue |
| 20 |
| 139 |
| ||
Other Current Liabilities |
| 86 |
| 50 |
| ||
Current Liabilities |
| 3,882 |
| 4,458 |
| ||
Intercompany Notes Payable |
| 3,097 |
| 4,890 |
| ||
Long-Term Debt |
| 2,200 |
| 2,200 |
| ||
Long-Term and Other Liabilities |
| 5,297 |
| 7,090 |
| ||
Total Shareholder’s Equity and Liabilities |
| $ | 4,227 |
| $ | 6,902 |
|
On July 9, 2007, $750,000 was paid to Katahdin Trust Company on the $2.2 million TMG term note from the majority of the proceeds of the sale of the Moncton Division of The Maricor Group, Canada Ltd.
Maricor Technologies, Inc.
As described more fully in Note 10, as of April 13, 2007, MAM has divested substantially all of the assets reported as Unregulated Software Technology. Consistent with the classification at December 31, 2006, the operations for this segment have been reclassified to discontinued operations.
The operating revenue and net loss for unregulated software technology for the second quarters and year-to-date 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| |||||||||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Loss From Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating Revenue |
| $ | 21 |
| $ | 82 |
| $ | 135 |
| $ | 120 |
|
Expenses |
| (224 | ) | (348 | ) | (546 | ) | (566 | ) | ||||
Loss from Operations |
| (203 | ) | (266 | ) | (411 | ) | (446 | ) | ||||
Benefit of Income Taxes |
| 86 |
| 104 |
| 164 |
| 173 |
| ||||
Net Loss — Unregulated Software Technology |
| $ | (117 | ) | $ | (162 | ) | $ | (247 | ) | $ | (273 | ) |
13
Mecel Properties
Consistent with its other unregulated operations, MAM has committed to a plan to divest Mecel Properties, and the results for Mecel have been reported as discontinued operations within “Other” for segment presentations.
The operating results for Mecel for the second quarters and year-to-date 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| |||||||||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Income From Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Intercompany Operating Revenue |
| $ | 29 |
| $ | 34 |
| $ | 62 |
| $ | 68 |
|
Third Party Operating Revenue |
| 3 |
| — |
| 3 |
| — |
| ||||
Expenses |
| (29 | ) | (24 | ) | (58 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||
Income From Operations |
| 3 |
| 10 |
| 7 |
| 12 |
| ||||
Provision for Income Taxes |
| (1 | ) | (5 | ) | (3 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Net Income — Other |
| $ | 2 |
| $ | 5 |
| $ | 4 |
| $ | 6 |
|
Mecel’s operating revenues through June 12, 2007, were derived from its lease of space to The Maricor Group, Canada Ltd, and have been eliminated in consolidation. TMGC assigned the lease to M&R Engineering following the sale of assets on June 12, 2007.
Mecel’s balance sheets at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, were as follows:
| June 30, |
| December 31, |
| |||
|
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| $ | 42 |
| $ | 8 |
|
Accounts Receivable from Associated Companies |
| 101 |
| 83 |
| ||
Other Current Assets |
| 5 |
| 4 |
| ||
Current Assets |
| 148 |
| 95 |
| ||
Fixed Assets, Net of Depreciation |
| 547 |
| 507 |
| ||
Total Assets |
| $ | 695 |
| $ | 602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Shareholder’s Equity and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Shareholder’s (Deficit) Equity |
| $ | 52 |
| $ | 45 |
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Employee Benefits |
| 10 |
| 17 |
| ||
Other Current Liabilities |
| 3 |
| — |
| ||
Intercompany Accounts Payable |
| 99 |
| 54 |
| ||
Current Liabilities |
| 112 |
| 71 |
| ||
Intercompany Notes Payable |
| 531 |
| 486 |
| ||
Total Shareholder’s Equity and Liabilities |
| $ | 695 |
| $ | 602 |
|
4. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company is organized based on products and services. Management monitors the operations of the Company in the following operating segments:
· Regulated electric utility: MPS and its inactive wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary, Me&NB;
· Unregulated engineering services: The Maricor Group and all of its subsidiaries and product and service lines, classified as discontinued operations;
· Unregulated software technology: Maricor Technologies, Inc., classified as discontinued operations;
· Unregulated energy marketing: EA, an inactive subsidiary classified as discontinued operations; and
14
· Other: Corporate costs directly associated with the unregulated subsidiaries, common costs not allocated to the regulated utility, and inter-company eliminations classified as continuing operations and the operations of Mecel Properties classified as discontinued operations.
The segment information for 2006 has been reclassified to conform to the 2007 presentation.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” MAM provides certain administrative support services to MPS, TMG, and MTI and their subsidiaries. The cost of services provided to MPS is billed to MPS based on a combination of direct charges and allocations. The cost of corporate services provided to the other unregulated entities remains at the holding company, and is not allocated or charged to the various subsidiaries. MPS also provides services to MAM and other affiliates. These services are billed to MAM and its affiliates at cost through inter-company transactions.
|
|
| (In thousands of dollars) |
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| Regulated |
| Unregulated |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| Electric |
| Engineering |
| Software |
| Energy |
| Other |
| Total |
| ||||||
Revenue from External Customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Regulated Operating Revenue |
| $ | 7,951 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 7,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Regulated Operation & Maintenance |
| 3,168 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 3,168 |
| ||||||
Unregulated Operation & Maintenance |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 355 |
| 355 |
| ||||||
Depreciation |
| 697 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 697 |
| ||||||
Amortization of Stranded Costs |
| 2,647 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,647 |
| ||||||
Amortization |
| 61 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 61 |
| ||||||
Taxes Other than Income |
| 440 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1 |
| 441 |
| ||||||
Income Taxes |
| 320 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (181 | ) | 139 |
| ||||||
Total Operating Expenses |
| 7,333 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 175 |
| 7,508 |
| ||||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
| 618 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (175 | ) | 443 |
| ||||||
Other Income (Deductions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Equity in Income of Associated Companies |
| 40 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (1 | ) | 39 |
| ||||||
Interest and Dividend Income |
| 17 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (11 | ) | 6 |
| ||||||
Other Income (Deductions) |
| (22 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (22 | ) | ||||||
Total Other Income (Deductions) |
| 35 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (12 | ) | 23 |
| ||||||
Income (Loss) Before Interest Charges |
| 653 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (187 | ) | 466 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest Charges |
| 197 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 83 |
| 280 |
| ||||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations |
| 456 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (270 | ) | 186 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Loss from Discontinued Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Estimated Loss on Sales of Discontinued Operations |
| — |
| (362 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (362 | ) | ||||||
Loss From Operations |
| — |
| (341 | ) | (203 | ) | — |
| (29 | ) | (573 | ) | ||||||
Benefit of (Provision for) Income Taxes |
| — |
| 287 |
| 86 |
| — |
| (1 | ) | 372 |
| ||||||
Loss from Discontinued Operations |
| — |
| (416 | ) | (117 | ) | — |
| (30 | ) | (563 | ) | ||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
| $ | 456 |
| $ | (416 | ) | $ | (117 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | (300 | ) | $ | (377 | ) |
15
|
|
|
| (In thousands of dollars) |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| Regulated |
| Unregulated |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| Electric |
| Engineering |
| Software |
| Energy |
| Other |
| Total |
| ||||||
Revenue from External Customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Regulated Operating Revenue |
| $ | 7,414 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 7,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Regulated Operation & Maintenance |
| 3,497 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 3,497 |
| ||||||
Unregulated Operation & Maintenance |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 179 |
| 179 |
| ||||||
Depreciation |
| 730 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 730 |
| ||||||
Amortization of Stranded Costs |
| 2,568 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,568 |
| ||||||
Amortization |
| (50 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (50 | ) | ||||||
Taxes Other than Income |
| 431 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 6 |
| 437 |
| ||||||
Income Taxes |
| 43 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (113 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||||
Total Operating Expenses |
| 7,219 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 72 |
| 7,291 |
| ||||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
| 195 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (72 | ) | 123 |
| ||||||
Other Income (Deductions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Equity in Income of Associated Companies |
| 49 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 150 |
| 199 |
| ||||||
Interest and Dividend Income |
| 18 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (16 | ) | 2 |
| ||||||
Other Income (Deductions) |
| (12 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| 4 |
| (8 | ) | ||||||
Total Other Income (Deductions) |
| 55 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 138 |
| 193 |
| ||||||
Income Before Interest Charges |
| 250 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 66 |
| 316 |
| ||||||
Interest Charges |
| 237 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 76 |
| 313 |
| ||||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations |
| 13 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (10 | ) | 3 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Loss from Discontinued Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
(Loss) Income From Operations |
| — |
| (252 | ) | (266 | ) | 2 |
| (25 | ) | (541 | ) | ||||||
Benefit of (Provision for) Income Taxes |
| — |
| 129 |
| 104 |
| — |
| (5 | ) | 228 |
| ||||||
(Loss) Income from Discontinued Operations |
| — |
| (123 | ) | (162 | ) | 2 |
| (30 | ) | (313 | ) | ||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
| $ | 13 |
| $ | (123 | ) | $ | (162 | ) | $ | 2 |
| $ | (40 | ) | $ | (310 | ) |
16
|
|
|
| (In thousands of dollars) |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| Regulated |
| Unregulated |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| Electric |
| Engineering |
| Software |
| Energy |
| Other |
| Total |
| ||||||
Revenue from External Customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Regulated Operating Revenue |
| $ | 18,866 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 18,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Regulated Operation & Maintenance |
| 6,545 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 6,545 |
| ||||||
Unregulated Operation & Maintenance |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 847 |
| 847 |
| ||||||
Depreciation |
| 1,408 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,408 |
| ||||||
Amortization of Stranded Costs |
| 5,451 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 5,451 |
| ||||||
Amortization |
| 116 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 116 |
| ||||||
Taxes Other than Income |
| 881 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 4 |
| 885 |
| ||||||
Income Taxes |
| 1,637 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (422 | ) | 1,215 |
| ||||||
Total Operating Expenses |
| 16,038 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 429 |
| 16,467 |
| ||||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
| 2,828 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (429 | ) | 2,399 |
| ||||||
Other Income (Deductions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Equity in Income of Associated Companies |
| 2 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (35 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||
Interest and Dividend Income |
| 34 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (21 | ) | 13 |
| ||||||
Other Income (Deductions) |
| (42 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (6 | ) | (48 | ) | ||||||
Total Other Income (Deductions) |
| (6 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (62 | ) | (68 | ) | ||||||
Income (Loss) Before Interest Charges |
| 2,822 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (491 | ) | 2,331 |
| ||||||
Interest Charges |
| 411 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 174 |
| 585 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations |
| 2,411 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (665 | ) | 1,746 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Loss from Discontinued Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Estimated Loss on Sales of Discontinued Operations |
| — |
| (362 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (362 | ) | ||||||
Loss From Operations |
| — |
| (454 | ) | (411 | ) | — |
| (58 | ) | (923 | ) | ||||||
Benefit of (Provision for) Income Taxes |
| — |
| 352 |
| 164 |
| — |
| (3 | ) | 513 |
| ||||||
Loss from Discontinued Operations |
| — |
| (464 | ) | (247 | ) | — |
| (61 | ) | (772 | ) | ||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
| $ | 2,411 |
| $ | (464 | ) | $ | (247 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | (726 | ) | $ | 974 |
|
Total Assets |
| $ | 134,509 |
| $ | 4,229 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 334 |
| $ | 1,687 |
| $ | 140,759 |
|
17
|
|
|
| (In thousands of dollars) |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| Regulated |
| Unregulated |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| Electric |
| Engineering |
| Software |
| Energy |
| Other |
| Total |
| ||||||
Revenue from External Customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Regulated Operating Revenue |
| $ | 17,465 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 17,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Regulated Operation & Maintenance |
| 7,241 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 7,241 |
| ||||||
Unregulated Operation & Maintenance |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 616 |
| 616 |
| ||||||
Depreciation |
| 1,445 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,445 |
| ||||||
Amortization of Stranded Costs |
| 5,378 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 5,378 |
| ||||||
Amortization |
| 29 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 29 |
| ||||||
Taxes Other than Income |
| 916 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 21 |
| 937 |
| ||||||
Income Taxes |
| 793 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (316 | ) | 477 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total Operating Expenses |
| 15,802 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 321 |
| 16,123 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
| 1,663 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (321 | ) | 1,342 |
| ||||||
Other Income (Deductions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Equity in Income of Associated Companies |
| 96 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 31 |
| 127 |
| ||||||
Interest and Dividend Income |
| 23 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (15 | ) | 8 |
| ||||||
Other Income (Deductions) |
| (72 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| 2 |
| (70 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total Other Income (Deductions) |
| 47 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 18 |
| 65 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Income (Loss) Before Interest Charges |
| 1,710 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (303 | ) | 1,407 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest Charges |
| 493 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 127 |
| 620 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations |
| 1,217 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (430 | ) | 787 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Loss from Discontinued Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
(Loss) Income From Operations |
| — |
| (470 | ) | (446 | ) | 2 |
| (57 | ) | (971 | ) | ||||||
Benefit of (Provision for) Income Taxes |
| — |
| 239 |
| 173 |
| — |
| (5 | ) | 407 |
| ||||||
Loss from Discontinued Operations |
| — |
| (231 | ) | (273 | ) | 2 |
| (62 | ) | (564 | ) | ||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
| $ | 1,217 |
| $ | (231 | ) | $ | (273 | ) | $ | 2 |
| $ | (492 | ) | $ | 223 |
|
Total Assets |
| $ | 130,558 |
| $ | 12,103 |
| $ | 1,935 |
| $ | 232 |
| $ | 398 |
| $ | 145,226 |
|
18
5. INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATED COMPANIES
Maricor Properties Ltd
On June 30, 2006, Maricor Properties sold one share of stock representing a 50% ownership interest to Ashford Investments Inc. This sale specifically excluded the economic ownership of Mecel, with MAM retaining 100% of the economic ownership of Mecel. Management reviewed the characteristics of Maricor Properties subsequent to this transaction in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB 51,” and determined that MAM remained the primary beneficiary of Mecel, but is not the primary beneficiary of Maricor Properties, including the Vaughan Harvey building and Cornwallis, as of the date of this transaction. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of Mecel remain consolidated in these financial statements, while the assets and liabilities of the other components of Maricor Properties are no longer consolidated. MAM’s investment in Maricor Properties is reported within “Investments in Associated Companies,” and receivables from Maricor Properties and its subsidiaries payable to MAM and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are presented within the line “Accounts Receivable from Associated Companies.”
Condensed financial information, as of June 30, 2007, for the components of Maricor Properties not consolidated in these financial statements is as follows (in thousands of dollars):
Total Assets |
| $ | 8,074 |
|
Less: |
|
|
| |
Long-term Debt |
| 6,022 |
| |
Short-term Debt |
| 1,732 |
| |
Other Liabilities |
| 120 |
| |
Net Assets |
| $ | 200 |
|
|
|
|
| |
MAM’s Equity in Net Assets |
| $ | 100 |
|
MAM recorded equity in the income of Maricor Properties, excluding Mecel, of $9,000 in the second quarter of 2007 and $2,000 year-to-date.
Maricor Ashford Ltd
As of March 21, 2007, MAM became an equal partner in Maricor Ashford Ltd, an inactive real estate development and redevelopment joint venture with Ashford Investments Inc., an unaffiliated real estate management company. Prior to this date, Maricor Properties was an equal partner in this joint venture with Ashford Investments Inc. Maricor Ashford Ltd is based in Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada. Management reviewed the characteristics of this joint venture in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB 51”, and determined that MAM is not the primary beneficiary of this joint venture. Accordingly, the activity of Maricor Ashford Ltd has been recorded in these financial statements under the equity method, and Maricor Ashford Ltd is not consolidated with these financial statements. MAM’s investment in the joint venture totaled $58,000 at June 30, 2007, with no impact on earnings during 2007.
Maine Yankee and MEPCO
MPS owns 5% of the common stock of Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (“Maine Yankee”), a jointly-owned nuclear electric power company, and 7.49% of the common stock of MEPCO, a jointly-owned electric transmission company. Although MPS’s ownership percentage of these entities is relatively low, it does have influence over the operating and financial decisions of these companies through board representation, and therefore, MPS records its’ investment in MEPCO and Maine Yankee using the equity method. This is consistent with industry practice for similar joint-owned units.
Substantially all earnings of Maine Yankee and MEPCO are distributed to investor companies. MPS’s portion of dividends declared, dividends received in cash, and stock redemptions declared and received in cash are presented in the following table:
19
| Quarter Ending June 30, |
| Six Months Ending June 30, |
| |||||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
|
Maine Yankee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends Declared |
| — |
| — |
| 20 |
| — |
|
Dividends Received in Cash |
| 20 |
| — |
| 20 |
| 41 |
|
Stock Redemptions Declared |
| 250 |
| 400 |
| 250 |
| 600 |
|
Stock Redemptions Received in Cash |
| — |
| 200 |
| 250 |
| 200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEPCO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends Declared |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| 4 |
| 4 |
|
Dividends Received in Cash |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| 4 |
| 171 |
|
6. STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN
Upon approval by MPS’s shareholders in June 2002, MPS adopted the 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan was subsequently adopted by MAM after its formation. The Plan is administered by the members of the Performance and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, who are not employees of the Company or its subsidiaries. The Company may grant options to its employees for up to 150,000 shares of common stock, provided that the maximum aggregate number of shares which may be issued under the Plan pursuant to incentive stock options shall be 120,000 shares. The exercise price for shares to be issued under any incentive stock option shall not be less than one-hundred percent (100%) of the fair market value of such shares on the date the option is granted. An option’s maximum term is ten years.
As of June 30, 2007, the former CEO has been the only employee to receive stock options, with 3,932 options outstanding for the remainder of the original ten-year term of these options.
The Company accounts for the fair value of its grants under the Plan in accordance with the expense provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.”
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for the grants:
Year of Issuance |
| 2003 |
| 2002 |
|
Number of Options Granted |
| 1,966 |
| 1,966 |
|
Vesting Period |
| 3 years |
| 3 years |
|
Number of Options Vested and Exercisable |
| 1,966 |
| 1,966 |
|
Dividend Yield |
| 4.60 | % | 4.70 | % |
Volatility |
| 20.00 | % | 20.00 | % |
Risk-Free Interest Rate |
| 3.00 | % | 4.60 | % |
Expected Life |
| 7 years |
| 7 years |
|
A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plan as of June 30, 2007, and changes during the year then ended is presented below:
| Shares |
| Average Exercise Price |
| |||
Options |
| 2007 |
| 2007 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
| 3,932 |
| $ | 30.28 |
| |
Granted |
| — |
| — |
| ||
Exercised |
| — |
| — |
| ||
Expired |
| — |
| — |
| ||
Forfeited |
| — |
| — |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Outstanding at June 30, 2007 |
| 3,932 |
| $ | 30.28 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Options exercisable at June 30, 2007 |
| 3,932 |
| $ | 30.28 |
| |
Weighted-average fair value of options granted |
| $ | 4.17 |
|
|
| |
The following table summarizes information about fixed stock options outstanding at June 30, 2007:
20
|
| Options Outstanding |
| Options Exercisable |
| ||||||||
Range of Exercise |
| Number |
| Weighted- |
| Weighted- |
| Number |
| Weighted- |
| ||
$30.10 - $30.45 |
| 3,932 |
| 5.42 yrs |
| $ | 30.28 |
| 3,932 |
| $ | 30.28 |
|
Dilutive earnings per share impact of outstanding stock options:
|
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Net (Loss) Income (in thousands) |
| $ | (377 | ) | $ | (310 | ) | $ | 974 |
| $ | 223 |
|
Shares Used in Computation of Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding in Computation of Basic Earnings per Share |
| 1,677,187 |
| 1,637,643 |
| 1,662,005 |
| 1,637,427 |
| ||||
Dilutive Effect of Common Stock Options |
| — |
| — |
| 3,932 |
| 23,625 |
| ||||
Dilutive Effect of Preferred Shares |
| — |
| — |
| 17,039 |
| 9,500 |
| ||||
Shares Used in Computation of Earnings per Common Share Assuming Dilution |
| 1,677,187 |
| 1,637,643 |
| 1,682,976 |
| 1,670,552 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net (Loss) Income per Share (Basic) |
| $ | (0.22 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.59 |
| $ | 0.14 |
|
Net (Loss) Income per Share (Diluted) |
| $ | (0.22 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.58 |
| $ | 0.13 |
|
The common stock options and preferred shares were anti-dilutive during the quarters ended June 30, 2007, and 2006, and are therefore omitted from the calculation of Diluted Earnings per Share. The weighted-average number of potentially dilutive shares outstanding during those periods were:
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| |||
|
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
|
Common Stock Options |
| 3,932 |
| 23,625 |
|
Preferred Shares |
| 17,039 |
| 9,500 |
|
Potentially Dilutive Shares |
| 20,971 |
| 33,125 |
|
7. BENEFIT PROGRAMS
The Company provides certain pension, post-retirement and welfare benefit programs to its employees. Benefit programs are an integral part of the Company’s commitment to hiring and retaining employees, providing market-based compensation that rewards individual and corporate performance. The Company offers welfare benefit plans to all employees, consisting of healthcare, life insurance, long-term disability, and accidental disability insurance. The Company also offers a retirement savings program to employees in the form of a 401(k) plan. This plan allows voluntary contributions by the employee and a contribution by the Company.
U. S. Defined Benefit Pension Plan
The Company has a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering Maine Public Service and certain former MAM employees. No employees of other unregulated businesses are eligible for this benefit plan. Benefits under the plan are based on employees’ years of service and compensation prior to retirement. New employees hired on or after January 1, 2006, are not eligible for the pension plan.
On December 31, 2006, future salary and service accruals for current participants in the plan ceased. In conjunction with this pension freeze, MPS recorded a one-time curtailment expense of approximately $98,000 in the fourth quarter of 2006. The Company agreed to additional employer contributions to the Retirement Savings Plan to compensate employees in part or in full, depending on their number of years of service, for this lost benefit. This additional contribution ranges from 5% to 25% of each eligible employee’s gross base pay, and is immediately fully vested.
The Company’s policy has been to fund pension costs accrued. In accordance with that policy, the Company plans to contribute approximately $824,000 to the pension plan for 2006 in 2007, prior to the filing of its 2006 corporate income tax return. The Company also expects to contribute approximately $250,000 per quarter during 2007 for 2007 estimated payments.
The following table sets forth the plan’s net periodic benefit cost:
21
| Pension Benefits |
| |||||||||||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Service cost |
| $ | — |
| $ | 140 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 281 |
|
Interest cost |
| 265 |
| 290 |
| 530 |
| 580 |
| ||||
Expected return on plan assets |
| (290 | ) | (272 | ) | (580 | ) | (544 | ) | ||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
| — |
| 23 |
| — |
| 46 |
| ||||
Recognized net actuarial (gain) |
| 16 |
| 44 |
| 32 |
| 87 |
| ||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
| $ | (9 | ) | $ | 225 |
| $ | (18 | ) | $ | 450 |
|
Health Care Benefits
The Company provides certain health care benefits to eligible employees. Eligible employees share in the cost of their medical benefits, in addition to plan deductibles and coinsurance payments. The plan also covers retiree medical coverage for employees of Maine Public Service Company, the regulated utility. In 2005, certain amendments were made to the plan, including the following: employees hired on or after October 1, 2005, are not eligible for post-retirement medical coverage. Effective January 1, 2006, certain retiree co-pays were increased, and spousal contributions commenced.
The following table sets forth the plan’s net periodic benefit cost:
| Health Care Benefits |
| |||||||||||
|
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| ||||||||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Service cost |
| $ | 45 |
| $ | 46 |
| $ | 90 |
| $ | 92 |
|
Interest cost |
| 124 |
| 126 |
| 248 |
| 252 |
| ||||
Expected return on plan assets |
| (53 | ) | (54 | ) | (106 | ) | (108 | ) | ||||
Amortization of transition obligation |
| 18 |
| 36 |
| 36 |
| 72 |
| ||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
| (15 | ) | (15 | ) | (30 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||
Recognized net actuarial (gain) |
| 45 |
| 43 |
| 90 |
| 86 |
| ||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
| $ | 164 |
| $ | 182 |
| $ | 328 |
| $ | 364 |
|
8. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND REGULATORY MATTERS
Legal Proceedings
Surplec, Inc.
On April 30, 2007, Surplec, Inc., (“Surplec”), the supplier of a transformer for a substation constructed by MPS in connection with a 42 MW wind project owned by Evergreen Wind Power, LLC, brought suit against MPS, UPC Wind Management LLC, and Evergreen Wind Power, LLC, (collectively “Defendants”) in the United States District Court District of Maine, (located in Bangor, Maine) seeking collection of approximately $227,795 it claims is still owed for the transformer, plus interest, attorney fees and punitive damages in a stated amount. MPS had contracted with Surplec to purchase a 30/40/50 MVA Transformer (“the Transformer”). Surplec alleged that MPS breached the contract and comitted fraud by failing to pay Surplec the third and final installment and shipping charges for the Transformer and Defendants’ use of the Transformer constitutes conversion. MPS has denied these allegations.
On June 21, 2007, MPS filed a Counterclaim against Surplec seeking an award of $199,000 (the amount MPS has already paid for the Transformer) as well as consequential and incidental damages. MPS alleged that Surplec failed to deliver the Transformer by the date indicated in the Contract and that the Transformer delivered was defective and nonconforming.
MPS has previously collected from Evergreen approximately $200,000 that would have been paid to Surplec had Surplec complied with its contractual obligations. MPS will continue to hold this amount pending the outcome of this litigation. MPS has recorded this amount under “Miscellaneous Liabilities” pending the outcome of this litigation. MPS believes that the claims for attorney fees and punitive damages are without merit under Maine law, and in any event such damages are not susceptible to estimation. MPS will vigorously defend against the claims made by Surplec and will continue to pursue its counter claims against
22
the supplier. MPS cannot predict the outcome of this litigation but is reasonably confident that it will prevail. To this end, MPS anticipates seeking dismissal of Surplec’s claims for attorney fees and punitive damages.
Regulatory Matters
Notice of Inquiry Regarding Allowance of Electric Utilities in Maine to Reenter Energy Supply Business
On July 25, 2007, the Maine Public Utilities Commission issued a Notice of Inquiry (“NOI”) regarding the reentry of electric utilities into the energy supply business. The NOI was issued based on a State of Maine Legislative Resolve that directs the MPUC to undertake a review of the issues involved with transmission and distribution (“T&D”) utilities entering the energy supply business. The Resolve specifies that for purposes of the review, “energy supply business” includes owning, operating or having an interest in electric generation facilities, load management activities or demand-side management activities. The Resolve requires that the MPUC submit a report containing its findings and recommendations for further action and legislation to implement its recommendations to the Joint Standing Committee on Utilities and Energy no later than January 15, 2008. The MPUC initiated this Inquiry to obtain information, viewpoints and recommendations from interested persons on the issues raised in the Resolve. MPS will actively participate in the NOI process.
MPUC Approves the Pass-Through of Retail Transmission Rates to MPS Retail Jurisdictional Customers, and the Increase to DSM Mil Rate, MPUC Docket No. 2003-516
Per agreement with the Maine Public Utilities Commission, the new transmission rates for retail customers were put into retail rates on July 1, 2007. These rates were approved by the MPUC on June 27, 2007. Per this filing, the DSM mil rate was increased by 16.7%, or approximately $110,000, and the retail transmission rate was increased by 10.2%, or approximately $345,000.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 2007 Open Access Transmission Tariff Formula Rate Filing
On May 21, 2007, MPS filed its updated rates under the 2007 Open Access Transmission Tariff (“OATT”) formula pursuant to Docket ER00-1053 for both wholesale and retail customers. The revenue increases were approximately $54,000 and $345,000, respectively. These new transmission rates are subject to a customer refund that may occur as a result of the proceeding and potential settlement negotiations.
Stakeholder Initiative Regarding the Competitiveness and Reliability of the Northern Maine Power Grid
In November 2006, the MPUC issued an Order in the Docket opened for the purpose of selecting a new standard offer provider for the Company’s service territory for the period beginning January 1, 2007. The then-existing Standard Offer arrangement was due to expire on December 31, 2006. The MPUC’s November 16, 2006, Order stated that it had received two bids from a single supplier. Based on this, the MPUC concluded that northern Maine lacked a competitive power market and directed the Company to furnish default Standard Offer Service for the fourteen-month period beginning January 1, 2007. On December 18, 2006, the MPUC granted reconsideration of its November 16, 2006, Order and awarded the Standard Offer contract to WPS Energy, Inc. (now known as Integrys Energy Services, Inc.), the incumbent supplier.
As a result of the MPUC’s determination regarding the absence of a competitive power market, and also in an effort to deal with the system reliability issues raised by the Company’s unsuccessful bid to secure a certificate for the construction of a new transmission line, the MPUC held a three-day stakeholders conference in mid-December 2006, in an attempt to resolve, on a collaborative basis, the issues raised in these cases. As a result of this effort, two parallel initiatives have been launched:
(a) the stakeholders were asked to develop a protocol allowing for the possibility of generation suppliers obtaining long-term power delivery commitments through the Standard Offer process and not through the Company. This could encourage the construction of new generation in the Company’s service territory, and/or secure the availability of existing on-system generating sources on a long-term (multi-year) basis. The Company cannot at this time predict whether all of the stakeholders will reach agreement on any such protocol initiative, or whether it will be finalized and accepted by the MPUC;
(b) the stakeholders were asked to address the feasibility of one or more proposals for transmission projects interconnecting the northern Maine grid with the ISO New England grid, possibly by means of a tap into the MEPCO 345 kV transmission line that connects the high voltage systems of Maine and New Brunswick, Canada.
The Company, in early 2007, announced that it has joined with Central Maine Power Company in an effort to determine the
23
feasibility of such a line.
Wheelabrator-Sherman
MPS was ordered into a Power Purchase Agreement (“PPA”) with Wheelabrator-Sherman (“WS”) in 1986, which required the purchase of the entire output (up to 126,582 MWH per year) of a 17.6 MW biomass plant through December 31, 2006. Total stranded costs included as regulatory assets under the caption “Deferred Fuel and Purchased Energy Costs” in the accompanying balance sheet related to this contract are $32.72 million and $34.69 million at June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, respectively.
Poly Chlorinated Bi-Phenol Transformers
In response to a Maine environmental regulation to phase out Poly Chlorinated Bi-phenol (“PCB”) transformers, MPS has implemented a program to eliminate transformers on its system that do not meet the State environmental guidelines. The Company is in the process of inspecting almost 13,000 distribution transformers over a ten-year period. MPS is currently in its sixth year of this ten-year program. Approximately 35% of the transformers inspected require “in service” PCB oil sampling. In addition, transformers that pass the inspection criteria will be refitted with new lightning arrestors and animal guards, where necessary. The current total estimated cost of the project is $2.6 million; as of June 30, 2007, $2.0 million of this total has been spent on this effort. The remaining cost of the project has been accrued on the Balance Sheet as “Accrued Removal Obligations.”
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Maricor Ashford Ltd joint venture and Maricor Properties, excluding Mecel, are variable interest entities, as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” (“FIN 46”) promulgated on January 17, 2003. Management has determined that Maricor Ashford and Maricor Properties should not be consolidated with these financial statements, as Ashford, not MAM, is the primary beneficiary of these companies.
The Company has several operating leases for office and field equipment, vehicles and office space, accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” (“SFAS 13”). The following summarizes payments for leases for a period in excess of one year:
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| |||||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||
Equipment |
| $ | 9 |
| $ | 10 |
|
Building |
| 120 |
| 110 |
| ||
Vehicles |
| 14 |
| 11 |
| ||
Rights of Way |
| 38 |
| 1 |
| ||
Field Equipment |
| 5 |
| 21 |
| ||
Total |
| $ | 186 |
| $ | 153 |
|
The future minimum lease payments for the items listed above for the next five years are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
Future Minimum Lease Payments by Year for All Items
Years |
| Minimum Lease |
|
2007 |
| 28 |
|
2008 |
| 221 |
|
2009 |
| 185 |
|
2010 |
| 107 |
|
2011 |
| 37 |
|
Financial Information System Hosting Agreement
In December 2003, the Company entered into a ten-year agreement with Delinea Corporation (now OneNeck IT Services) to host and provide technical and functional support for the integrated Oracle Financial Information System. The base hosting fees were $450,000 for 2004, $510,000 for 2005, and $575,000 per year for years 2006 through 2013. This contract was
24
re-negotiated effective January 1, 2007. The annual fee was reduced to $537,500 per year from 2007 through 2013, plus reimbursement for travel costs. Further, based on certain service quality targets, contingent payments of $8,000 per quarter could also be earned by OneNeck.
9. CAPITAL LEASES
MPS financed certain of its 2006 and 2007 vehicle and computer equipment purchases through capital leases totaling $544,000. The remaining liability as of June 30, 2007, for these capital lease arrangements is approximately $464,000, and is recorded within Miscellaneous Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Future minimum lease payments in thousands of dollars are:
Years |
| Minimum Lease Payments |
| |
2007 |
| $ | 63 |
|
2008 |
| $ | 133 |
|
2009 |
| $ | 121 |
|
2010 |
| $ | 100 |
|
2011 |
| $ | 47 |
|
10. DIVESTITURE OF UNREGULATED OPERATIONS
Divestiture of Maricor Technologies, Inc. Assets and Termination of Segment Operations
In conjunction with the Company’s return to a utility and utility-related strategy, described more fully in the MAM 2006 Form 10-K, the majority of the operations of MTI were terminated on March 23, 2007. On April 13, 2007, Maine & Maritimes Corporation sold substantially all of the assets of Maricor Technologies, Inc. to HCI Systems Asset Management, LLC. MAM originally acquired these assets from HCI on February 15, 2005, in exchange for a combination of cash, preferred stock, and certain options, including a put option for the preferred stock worth $200,000. Under the terms of the sale, HCI released all of its rights under an Option Agreement with MAM dated February 15, 2005, including this put option. HCI converted its Series A-2 Preferred Stock into 26,000 shares of MAM common stock on April 13, 2007. The Series A-1 Preferred Stock was converted to 12,078 shares of common stock in the first quarter of 2007. Further, HCI will be eligible to receive additional shares of MAM common stock on March 31, 2008, if the trading price of MAM’s stock is less than $25 per share on that date. See Note 3, Discontinued Operations, for the net loss and earnings per share impact of MTI.
Divestiture of Engineering Divisions in Canada
On June 19, 2007, Maine & Maritimes Corporation sold substantially all of the operating assets and liabilities of the Moncton & St. John divisions of TMGC to MCW Consultants Ltd. headquartered in Toronto, Canada. Similarly, on June 12, 2007, substantially all of the operating assets and liabilities of the Halifax division of TMGC were sold to M&R Engineering Ltd., which is owned and operated by the former president of that division. The sales of these assets yielded approximately $2 million. The proceeds from the sales of these engineering segment divisions were used to repay loans borrowed by The Maricor Group parent company in connection with the original acquisitions of the engineering businesses. There will be some on-going costs related to the shut-down of these divisions, including insurance and legal costs. The total estimated loss recorded on these sales and the anticipated divestiture of TMGNE was $5.08 million.
25
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This filing contains certain “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, related to the expected future performance of our plans and objectives, such as forecasts and projections of expected future performance or statements of Management’s plans and objectives. These forward-looking statements may be contained in filings with the SEC and in press releases and oral statements. We use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. These statements are based on the current expectations, estimates or projections of Management and are not guarantees of future performance. Some or all of these forward-looking statements may not turn out to be what the Company expected. Actual results will differ, and some of the differences may be material.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our projections include, among other matters, strategic risk, liquidity and capital formation risk, interest rate and debt covenant risk, attraction and retention of qualified employees, equity price risk, legislation and regulation, divestiture of unregulated segments, general economic conditions, collections risk, information technology risks, economy of the region, environmental risks, aging infrastructure and reliability, weather, vandalism, terrorism and other illegal acts, alternative generation options, foreign operations, franchises and competition, professional liability and technological obsolescence. Therefore, no assurances can be given that the outcomes stated in such forward-looking statements and estimates will be achieved.
Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are disclosed in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K and its first quarter 2007 Form 10-Q.
Executive Overview
As more fully described in our Annual Report filed in March 2007, and the first quarter 10-Q filed in May 2007, the Company is transitioning away from unrelated business segments in favor of focusing on our core competencies in and related to the regulated utility. To that end, we have classified our utility business and the holding company as “Continuing Operations” and the segments we are divesting as “Discontinued Operations.”
Net income from Continuing Operations was strong again in the second quarter, providing net income of $186,000, compared to the prior year quarter’s net income of $3,000. Year-to-date net income from Continuing Operations was $1.75 million in 2007, more than doubling the amount of $787,000 in 2006. Maine Public Service, the regulated electric utility continues to outpace prior year’s earnings as a result of strong kilowatt hour sales volumes year-to-date, the distribution rate increase effective July 15, 2006, reduced operations and maintenance expenditures and higher-than-projected revenues from transmission wheeling.
Net losses from Discontinued Operations negatively impacted the quarter by $563,000 compared with the prior year quarterly net loss of $313,000. Year-to-date net losses were $772,000 compared with prior year losses of $564,000. The chief causes of these results were (a) additional losses on operations before the sales of two of our divisions, and (b) a revision to the loss from these sales, previously shown in the Company’s financial statements, in the amount of $362,000. We have made considerable progress in the divestiture of our Discontinued Operations in the second quarter with the closing of three transactions.
On June 19, 2007, Maine & Maritimes Corporation sold substantially all of the assets of The Maricor Group, Canada Ltd Moncton & St. John divisions to MCW Consultants Ltd. headquartered in Toronto, Canada. Similarly, on June 12, 2007, substantially all of the assets of The Maricor Group, Canada Halifax division were sold to M&R Engineering Ltd., which is owned and operated by the former president of that division. The sales of these assets yielded approximately $2 million. The proceeds from the sales of these engineering segment divisions were used to repay loans borrowed by The Maricor Group parent company in connection with the original acquisitions of the engineering businesses.
On April 13, 2007, Maine & Maritimes Corporation sold substantially all of the assets of Maricor Technologies, Inc. to HCI Systems Asset Management, LLC. Under the terms of the sale, HCI released all of its rights under an Option Agreement dated February 15, 2005, including a put option worth $200,000. In connection with the sale, HCI converted its Series A-2 Preferred Stock into 26,000 shares of MAM common stock on April 13, 2007. HCI will be eligible to receive additional shares of MAM common stock on March 31, 2008, if the trading price of MAM’s stock is less than $25 per share on that date.
26
Following these sales, The Maricor Group New England, Inc., in Boston, Massachusetts, is the only remaining division of the engineering segment. Management is in the process of winding down this operation by completing or transferring existing contracts, and simultaneously pursuing a sale of the company. In addition, we plan to sell the remainder of our investments in commercial real estate in Atlantic Canada. We expect that the divestiture of our remaining unregulated operations will be completed during 2007.
In addition to the sales of our unregulated businesses, we are making steady progress in our efforts to grow our regulated utility operations. We continue to meet with stakeholders regarding the interconnection of Maine Public Service Company with the ISO New England transmission system. We are also facilitating the development of additional generation in our service territory, including a plan to develop up to 800 MW of wind generation in Aroostook County. These two initiatives could ultimately serve to connect a resource-rich region (northern Maine) with a resource-deficient region (southern New England) which has a growing demand for renewable energy. As we previously announced on March 1, 2007, MPS is actively working with Central Maine Power to explore the development of a transmission line connecting our two systems, as well as long-term contracts with existing and new generators who will use the line. Management believes these types of projects will allow us to continue to provide safe, reliable, and cost effective transmission and distribution services to our customers, as well as increase shareholder value in the long-term.
Overall Results of Operations—Consolidated
Net Income and Earnings Per Share
| Quarters Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| |||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands Except per Share Amounts) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Income from Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Regulated Electric Utility |
| $ | 456 |
| $ | 13 |
| $ | 2,411 |
| $ | 1,217 |
|
Other* |
| (270 | ) | (10 | ) | (665 | ) | (430 | ) | ||||
Income from Continuing Operations |
| 186 |
| 3 |
| 1,746 |
| 787 |
| ||||
Loss from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Unregulated Engineering Services |
| (416 | ) | (123 | ) | (464 | ) | (231 | ) | ||||
Unregulated Software Technology |
| (117 | ) | (162 | ) | (247 | ) | (273 | ) | ||||
Other* |
| (30 | ) | (28 | ) | (61 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||
Loss from Discontinued Operations |
| (563 | ) | (313 | ) | (772 | ) | (564 | ) | ||||
Net Income (Loss) |
| $ | (377 | ) | $ | (310 | ) | $ | 974 |
| $ | 223 |
|
Basic Income (Loss) Per Share |
| $ | (0.22 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.59 |
| $ | 0.14 |
|
*The “Other” line in continuing operations includes corporate costs directly associated with the unregulated subsidiaries, common costs not allocated to the regulated utility and inter-company eliminations. In discontinued operations, the “Other” line represents the net loss of Mecel Properties, less inter-company eliminations.
Net income above is derived from the segments as presented in Note 4, “Segment Information,” of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The results by segment are explained more fully in the following sections.
The financial results of the continuing operations have improved in the second quarter of 2007 from the second quarter of 2006. However, increased earnings from the regulated electric utility were more than offset by the increased losses of the unregulated engineering services discontinued operation. This has led to an overall increase in basic net loss of $0.03 per share of common stock, from $(0.19) for the second quarter of 2006 to $(0.22) in the second quarter of 2007. For the year-to-date, there has been an increase in basic net income per share of $0.45, with the net income per share for the period ended June 30, 2007, of $0.59 per share compared to $0.14 per share for the same period in 2006.
Interest Expense
Net interest charges for continuing operations in the second quarter of 2007 were lower than the second quarter of 2006, decreasing from $313,000 to $280,000, mostly due to the increase in offsetting stranded cost carrying charges as a result of the higher deferred fuel balance. Similarly, year-to-date net interest charges were reduced from $620,000 in 2006 to $585,000 in 2007.
Income Tax Expense / Benefit
The regulated provision for income taxes increased from the regulated business to $320,000, from $43,000 in the second quarter of 2007, as compared with 2006, as a result of the increase in earnings. The benefit from income taxes from continuing unregulated operations increased from $113,000 for the second quarter of 2006 to $181,000 for the second quarter of 2007.
27
Similarly, year-to-date, the provision for regulated income taxes has increased from $793,000 in 2006 to $1,637,000 in 2007. The benefit from income taxes from continuing unregulated operations increased from $316,000 year-to-date in 2006 to $422,000 year-to-date in 2007.
Taxes Other Than Income
Taxes other than income are primarily payroll and property taxes. These taxes increased slightly from $437,000 for the second quarter of 2006 to $441,000 for the same period in 2007. Year-to-date, these expenses are lower in 2007 than for the same period in 2006, the amounts being $885,000 and $937,000, respectively. The primary reasons for the year-to-date decrease are the reduction of payroll taxes, due to reductions in work force that commenced in late 2006.
Regulated Operations
The following tables and discussion include the operations of MPS and Me&NB, the Company’s regulated subsidiary and inactive unregulated Canadian subsidiary:
| Quarter Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| |||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Net Income — Regulated Electric Utility (In thousands) |
| $ | 456 |
| $ | 13 |
| $ | 2,411 |
| $ | 1,217 |
|
Earnings Per Share from Regulated Electric Utilities |
| $ | 0.27 |
| $ | 0.01 |
| $ | 1.45 |
| $ | 0.74 |
|
Regulated Operating Revenue
Consolidated revenues and Megawatt Hours (“MWH”) for the quarters ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and for year-to-date, are as follows:
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||||||||||
|
| Dollars |
| MWH |
| Dollars |
| MWH |
| Dollars |
| MWH |
| Dollars |
| MWH |
| ||||
Residential |
| $ | 3,582 |
| 42,126 |
| $ | 3,263 |
| 41,537 |
| $ | 7,919 |
| 94,123 |
| $ | 7,198 |
| 91,843 |
|
Large Commercial |
| 1,034 |
| 43,682 |
| 1,019 |
| 42,746 |
| 2,517 |
| 86,415 |
| 2,624 |
| 86,720 |
| ||||
Medium Commercial |
| 1,047 |
| 25,456 |
| 1,005 |
| 24,687 |
| 2,995 |
| 53,290 |
| 2,820 |
| 51,215 |
| ||||
Small Commercial |
| 1,413 |
| 21,742 |
| 1,305 |
| 21,444 |
| 3,929 |
| 48,297 |
| 3,590 |
| 46,939 |
| ||||
Other Retail |
| 228 |
| 847 |
| 205 |
| 839 |
| 456 |
| 1,694 |
| 413 |
| 1,693 |
| ||||
Total Regulated Retail Revenue |
| 7,304 |
| 133,853 |
| 6,797 |
| 131,253 |
| 17,816 |
| 283,819 |
| 16,645 |
| 278,410 |
| ||||
Other Revenue |
| 647 |
|
|
| 617 |
|
|
| 1,050 |
|
|
| 820 |
|
|
| ||||
Total Regulated Revenue |
| $ | 7,951 |
|
|
| $ | 7,414 |
|
|
| $ | 18,866 |
|
|
| $ | 17,465 |
|
|
|
Total regulated revenue increased $537,000 or 7.2% in the second quarter of 2007 from the second quarter of 2006. Residential customer revenue accounted for approximately $319,000 of this increase, a combination of the 1.4% or 589 MWH increase in volume and the impact of the rate increase effective July 15, 2006. Medium and small commercial customer revenue also increased $150,000 or 6.5%, for the same reasons. Sales volume for these classes increased 1,067 MWH or 2.3%. The volume increase accounted for $49,000 of the $150,000 increase, and increased rates accounted for $101,000 of the increase.
Large commercial customer revenue increased $15,000 or 1.5% in the second quarter of 2007 from the second quarter of 2006. This increase was partly volume driven, with total sales up 936 MWH or 2.2% from the prior year. The increase in volume accounted for the most of the $15,000 increase in revenue.
Other regulated operating revenue of $647,000 exceeded that of the prior year by $30,000, due to increased transmission wheeling revenue. MPS’s transmission rates are based on the revenue requirement (transmission expenses plus the allowed return on assets) less the wheeling revenue earned. The rates go into effect on July 1 each year, and are calculated from the financial results of the previous calendar year. The additional wheeling revenue earned during 2007 will offset the revenue requirement in the establishment of the rates that will go into effect on July 1, 2008.
Total regulated revenue for the first six months of 2007 increased $1.4 million or 8% over the same period in 2006. Other revenue is up by $230,000, also due to increased transmission wheeling revenue. Sales volumes for the first six months of 2007
28
increased 5,409 MWH or 1.9%, compared to the same period in 2006. The increase in volume accounted for $388,000 of the $1.4 million increase in revenue, with the rate increase accounting for $783,000.
For more information on regulatory orders approving the most recent rate increases, see Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings” of this Form 10-Q, and Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” of the Company’s 2006 Form 10-K.
Regulated Utility Expenses
For the quarters ended June 30, 2007, and 2006 and for year-to-date, regulated operation and maintenance expenses and stranded costs are as follows:
|
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| ||||||||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Regulated Operation and Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Labor |
| $ | 1,132 |
| $ | 1,207 |
| $ | 2,251 |
| $ | 2,494 |
|
Benefits |
| 267 |
| 516 |
| 713 |
| 1,067 |
| ||||
Outside Services |
| 242 |
| 160 |
| 441 |
| 371 |
| ||||
Holding Company Management Costs |
| 526 |
| 540 |
| 962 |
| 1,141 |
| ||||
Insurance |
| 131 |
| 135 |
| 273 |
| 259 |
| ||||
Regulatory and Licensing |
| 247 |
| 214 |
| 500 |
| 423 |
| ||||
Transportation |
| 174 |
| 244 |
| 489 |
| 448 |
| ||||
Other |
| 449 |
| 481 |
| 916 |
| 1,038 |
| ||||
Total Regulated Operation and Maintenance |
| $ | 3,168 |
| $ | 3,497 |
| $ | 6,545 |
| $ | 7,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Stranded Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Wheelabrator-Sherman |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,749 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 3,867 |
|
Maine Yankee |
| 721 |
| 633 |
| 1,441 |
| 1,407 |
| ||||
Seabrook |
| 384 |
| 385 |
| 768 |
| 769 |
| ||||
Amortization of Wheelabrator-Sherman Restructuring Pmt. |
| — |
| 362 |
| — |
| 725 |
| ||||
Deferred Fuel |
| 1,345 |
| (631 | ) | 2,849 |
| (1,530 | ) | ||||
Cost Incentive Refund |
| 62 |
| — |
| 125 |
| — |
| ||||
Cancelled Transmission Plant |
| 65 |
| — |
| 128 |
| — |
| ||||
Special Discounts |
| 70 |
| 70 |
| 140 |
| 140 |
| ||||
Total Stranded Costs |
| $ | 2,647 |
| $ | 2,568 |
| $ | 5,451 |
| $ | 5,378 |
|
Overall regulated operation and maintenance expense decreased $329,000 or 9.4% in the second quarter of 2007 from the second quarter of 2006. The decreases were as follows:
· Labor expenses decreased $75,000, with a $44,000 reduction in expense due to a shift in labor from maintenance to capital and billable construction work. The remaining decrease is due to reduced non-productive labor expenses, offset by an increase in overtime labor.
· Benefits expense decreased $249,000 in 2007 from 2006, due to a $24,000 reduction in workers compensation expense, and a $261,000 decrease in pension expense as a results of the freeze of future service accruals under the MPS pension plan. These decreases were partly offset by a $72,000 increase in other benefit expenses, mainly the Company’s contributions to the employees’ 401(k) plan.
· Holding company management costs were reduced by $14,000, due to the combination of a decrease in total costs, and the reduction of the percentage of these costs allocated to MPS.
These decreases were partly offset by an increase in regulatory and licensing expenses of approximately $33,000, and an increase in outside legal and consulting services expenses of $82,000.
Overall regulated operation and maintenance expense decreased $696,000 or 9.6% in the first six months of 2007 from the same period in 2006. The decreases were as follows:
· Labor expenses decreased $243,000, with a $65,000 reduction in expense due to a shift in labor from maintenance to capital and billable construction work. The remaining decrease is due to reduced non-productive labor expenses, offset by an $8,000 increase in overtime labor.
29
· Benefits expense decreased $354,000 in 2007 from 2006, due to a $77,000 reduction in workers compensation expense, and a $431,000 decrease in pension expense. These decreases were partly offset by a $154,000 increase in other benefit expenses, mainly the Company’s contributions to the employees’ 401(k) plan.
· Holding company management costs were reduced by $179,000, due to the combination of a decrease in total costs, and the reduction of the percentage of these costs allocated to MPS.
These decreases were partly offset by an increase in insurance and regulatory expenses of approximately $91,000, and an increase in outside legal and consulting services expenses of $70,000.
Stranded cost expenses in 2007 reflect the impact of the stranded cost rate case, MPUC Docket No. 2006-506, and the expiration of MPS’s purchase power agreement with Wheelabrator-Sherman. The expenses reported for 2006 are based on the stranded costs rates established in MPUC Docket No. 2003-666.
The Wheelabrator-Sherman expenses reported in 2006 were the payments for purchased power, offset by the receipts from the sale of that energy. With the expiration of this contract December 31, 2006, no additional energy has been purchased. The offsets to expense of $631,000 in the second quarter, and $1,530,000 year-to-date, are the deferral of the net expense of the purchased power contract beyond the total expense allowed for recovery in Docket No. 2003-666. MPS is now recovering its deferred fuel costs. The amortization of the deferred fuel stranded costs, a non-cash expense, was $1.3 million in the second quarter of 2007, and $2.8 million year-to-date.
Under Docket No. 2003-666, MPS was also allowed recovery of a new stranded cost, the cost incentive refund, amortization of which began January 2007.
In September 2006, MPS began amortization of its cancelled transmission plant, in accordance with the settlement of the 2006 OATT. This amortization totaled $65,000 in the second quarter of 2007.
Other Continuing Operations
| Quarter Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| |||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Net Loss — Other Continuing Operations (in thousands) |
| $ | (270 | ) | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (665 | ) | $ | (430 | ) |
Loss Per Share from Other Continuing Operations |
| $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.40 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) |
Other continuing operations represent the common costs of MAM that cannot be allocated to MPS, the corporate costs of MAM directly associated with the unregulated businesses and inter-company eliminations. The divestitures to date and additional plans to divest the unregulated operations may reduce the costs included in this segment; however, some of these costs are expected to continue subsequent to the divestiture of the unregulated operations without other cost reduction or recovery efforts.
The operating expenses, net of tax, of this segment increased from $179,000 in the second quarter of 2006 to $355,000 in the second quarter of 2007. Similarly, operating expenses year-to-date increased from $616,000 in 2006 to $847,000 in 2007. The majority of this increase is a result of the reduction in the percentage of common costs allocated to MPS and the allocation of one-third of the Oracle financial system hosting fees to MAM.
Unregulated Engineering Services – Discontinued Operations
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| |||||||||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Net Loss — Unregulated Engineering Services |
| $ | (416 | ) | $ | (123 | ) | $ | (464 | ) | $ | (231 | ) |
Basic Loss Per Share from Unregulated Engineering Services |
| $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | (0.28 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) |
The net loss of the unregulated engineering services segment has increased from $123,000 in the second quarter of 2006 to $416,000 in the second quarter of 2007. The first quarter of 2007 had been better than the first quarter of 2006 as a result of the combination of higher revenue and the reduction of certain expenses. In the second quarter of 2007, a true-up of estimated losses from the sales of the Canadian engineering divisions in the amount of $362,000 was recorded in the second quarter of 2007. Included in this loss is a write-off of the remaining goodwill of $283,000, before taxes.
Unregulated engineering services revenues for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2007, and 2006:
30
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| |||||||||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
The Maricor Group New England |
| $ | 172 |
| $ | 425 |
| $ | 549 |
| $ | 895 |
|
The Maricor Group, Canada Ltd |
| 453 |
| 1,000 |
| 1,743 |
| 1,878 |
| ||||
Total Unregulated Engineering Operating Revenue |
| $ | 625 |
| $ | 1,425 |
| $ | 2,292 |
| $ | 2,773 |
|
Total revenue for the segment decreased approximately $481,000 or 17.3% in total over prior year. The major decrease was in the U.S. operations, with a $346,000 decrease from 2006, as these operations are winding down.
Unregulated engineering services expenses for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2007, and 2006 were as follows:
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| |||||||||
(In thousands of dollars) |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Unregulated Operation & Maintenance |
| $ | 889 |
| $ | 1,563 |
| $ | 2,578 |
| $ | 3,026 |
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
| 2 |
| 35 |
| 6 |
| 61 |
| ||||
Taxes Other than Income |
| 1 |
| 15 |
| 10 |
| 35 |
| ||||
Interest |
| 74 |
| 64 |
| 152 |
| 121 |
| ||||
Loss on Sale of Engineering Divisions |
| 362 |
| — |
| 362 |
| — |
| ||||
Total Unregulated Engineering Expenses |
| $ | 1,328 |
| $ | 1,677 |
| $ | 3,108 |
| $ | 3,243 |
|
Unregulated engineering services expenses decreased as a result of the sales of The Maricor Group, Canada Ltd divisions, despite additional write-offs of goodwill of 283,000 in the second quarter and a true-up of the estimated loss on sales of these divisions in the amount of $79,000.
Unregulated Software Technology- Discontinued Operations
The following section details the operations of the unregulated software technology segment:
| Quarter Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| |||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2006 |
| ||||
Net Loss — Unregulated Software Technology (In thousands) |
| $ | (117 | ) | $ | (162 | ) | $ | (247 | ) | $ | (273 | ) |
Loss Per Share from Unregulated Software Technology |
| $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) |
The assets of Maricor Technologies, Inc. were sold on April 13, 2007. The net loss above represents revenues from the completion of software and consulting sales less expenses to complete these projects, and otherwise close operations.
Income Taxes
Please refer to the Note 2 of the financial statements for a discussion of the effects of income taxes.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Financial Information System Hosting Agreement
Please refer to Note 8 of the financial statements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
MAM’s current liabilities of $17.5 million as of June 30, 2007, exceed its current assets of $15.2 million by $2.3 million, exposing MAM to liquidity concerns and the risk of being unable to fulfill its obligations in 2007. Of these current liabilities, $6.0 million represents short-term borrowings, including the MPS line of credit with Bank of America. MAM has taken steps to mitigate this short-term risk, including identification of options to reduce or defer costs. Based on these steps and current financial projections, MAM has sufficient cash flow for the foreseeable future.
In the long term, Management expects MAM’s cash flow to improve, with MPS’s recovery of deferred fuel costs. Until 2007, the cash expenditures for deferred fuel exceeded the recovery of stranded costs. With the expiration of the Wheelabrator-Sherman contract in December 2006, this position has reversed, and recovery of stranded costs is exceeding the cash outflows. These stranded cost free cash flows are being used, in part, to retire debt and pay for capital expenditures.
31
The Company’s cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2007, were $1.4 million, up from $715,000 at March 31, 2007. The “Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows” of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements as presented in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q, reflects the Company’s sources and uses of capital.
Net cash flow from operating activities for the first six months of 2007 was $5.51 million, compared to $1.80 million in the first six months of 2006. The change in deferred regulatory and debt issuance costs was the largest increase in operating cash flow, as a result of the expiration of the Wheelabrator-Sherman contract in December 2006.
Cash flow used for investing activities decreased cash by approximately $925,000 in the first six months of 2007. The largest use of cash for investing in 2007 were fixed asset investments of $2.56 million, with another $187,000 used for settlement of the stock contingencies associated with acquisitions of engineering firms in 2003 and 2004. For the first six months of 2006, cash flow used for investing activity totaled $1.42 million, of which $1.55 million was invested in fixed assets for continuing operations and $248,000 was invested in the activities of the discontinued operations. Approximately $244,000 was used in the first quarter of 2006 for settlement of the stock contingencies associated with acquisitions in 2003 and 2004, offset by $429,000 from the sale of stock of Maricor Properties.
Cash flow used for financing included the repayment of short- and long-term debt totaling $4.07 million the first six months of 2007. On June 15, 2007, Maine & Maritimes Corporation paid off the $1 million TMG Line of Credit with Katahdin Trust Company with the proceeds of the sale of the Halifax Division of The Maricor Group, Canada Ltd. On July 9, 2007, $750,000 was paid down on the TMG $2.2 million term note with Katahdin Trust Company with a substantial portion of the proceeds from the sale of the Moncton Division of The Maricor Group, Canada Ltd. The terms of the remaining $1.45 million note were amended at that time, whereby the repayment schedule was adjusted to include five months of interest only beginning July 29, 2007, with 36 payments of principal and interest in the amount of $37,500 each with the first payment beginning December 31, 2007, and one final payment of all unpaid principal, accrued interest and any unpaid late charges due on December 29, 2010. Cash flow used for financing activities for the first six months of 2006 totaled $445,000, as long-term debt was reduced by $1.19 million and short-term debt was increased by $745,000.
The Maricor Group and its subsidiaries incurred equity price risk when it bought the stock of certain of its subsidiaries. Part of the consideration was MAM stock. In the event that the price of MAM common stock was below a specified price when the seller wished to dispose of it, The Maricor Group (or the applicable subsidiary) agreed to pay the difference. There were 12,603 shares outstanding pursuant to this kind of agreement at June 30, 2007. At a market price of $26.85 per share at June 30, 2007, the total exposure is approximately $180,000. A $1 increase in MAM’s share price would decrease this exposure by approximately $13,000. A $1 decrease in MAM’s share price would increase this exposure by $13,000.
In accordance with rate stipulations approved by the MPUC, for ratemaking purposes, MPS is required to maintain a capital structure not to include more than 51% common equity for the determination of delivery rates. Also, in the order approving the reorganization of MPS and the formation of Maine & Maritimes Corporation, the parties stipulated to several restrictions on the capital structure of MPS and MPS’s ability to make dividend payments to MAM. As of June 30, 2007, MPS is in compliance with these conditions.
As part of the refinancing of short-term borrowings during 2005, MAM and certain of its subsidiaries agreed to certain financial and other covenants, such as debt service coverage and earnings before interest and taxes (“EBIT”) ratios. In the event of a default, the various lenders could require immediate repayment of the debt. A default could also trigger increases in interest rates, difficulty obtaining other sources of financings and cross-default provisions within the debt agreements. A default on the MPS line of credit with Bank of America is a cross-default on the MAM line of credit with Bank of America. In addition, MAM has guaranteed a TMG facility with Katahdin Trust Company, and a Maricor Properties term loan with Royal Bank of Canada. MAM is in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2007.
Regulatory Proceedings
For regulatory proceedings, see Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings,” which is incorporated in this section by this reference.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The following represents Maine & Maritimes Corporation’s more significant market risks. While every effort is made to describe the character of the organization’s risks, it cannot warrant that this list is all inclusive. The Company, where possible, does take steps in each of the following areas to attempt to mitigate such risks.
(a) MAM and its subsidiaries are faced with interest rate risk on the MAM $4.0 million Bank of America line of credit, the TMG $1.45 million term note with Katahdin Trust Company, and the MPS $10 million line of credit and unsecured $6 million, seven-year term loan.
32
MPS fixed interest rates on three variable rate debt issues on September 9, 2003, with a derivative interest rate swap transaction. These interest rate swaps effectively fixed through maturity the rates on the 1996 Series due in 2021 and the 2000 Series due in 2025 at 4.42% and 4.53%, respectively. The rate on the 1998 Notes due in 2008 was also fixed at 2.79% through maturity. As of June 30, 2007, the 1996 and 2000 Series and the 1998 FAME Notes had outstanding balances of $13.6 million, $9.0 million and $2.175 million, respectively. The fixed rates are higher than the previous floating rates and continue to be as of the date of this filing. Although incurring no up-front cost to execute the swaps, MPS is currently incurring increased interest expenses. However, Management believes that the fixing of interest rates over the terms of the debt will serve to protect both shareholders and consumers from what it believes to be upward variable interest rate pressures.
MPS also purchased a 7% interest rate cap, which expires in 2008, for MPS’s Taxable Electric Rate Stabilization Revenue Notes issued in 1998 on its behalf by the Finance Authority of Maine (“FAME”). Further discussion on these debt issues and the associated interest rate caps is contained in Item 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Long-Term Debt” of MAM’s 2006 Form 10-K, and is hereby incorporated by this reference.
(b) Transactions with Me&NB, and MAM’s investment in Maricor Properties Ltd are subject to foreign currency translation risk. Income and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange for the period of time the income is earned or the expenses are incurred. Assets and liabilities are translated at period-end exchange rates.
(c) The Maricor Group and its subsidiaries incurred equity price risk when it bought the stock of certain of its subsidiaries. Part of the consideration was MAM stock. In the event that the price of MAM common stock was below a specified price when the seller wished to dispose of it, The Maricor Group (or the applicable subsidiary) agreed to pay the difference. There were 12,603 shares outstanding pursuant to this kind of agreement at June 30, 2007. At a market price of $26.85 per share at June 30, 2007, the total exposure is approximately $180,000. A $1 increase in MAM’s share price would decrease this exposure by approximately $13,000. A $1 decrease in MAM’s share price would increase this exposure by $13,000.
Market price protection of a different sort was given by Maricor Technologies, Inc. under the terms of the sale of the MTI assets to HCI on April 13, 2007. Under this agreement, HCI converted its remaining 6,500 preferred shares to 26,000 common shares on that date. If MAM’s stock price is less than $25 on March 31, 2008, HCI is entitled to additional shares of common stock.
(d) The Company’s unregulated real estate development and investment subsidiary, Maricor Properties Ltd, and its subsidiaries, Cornwallis Court Developments Ltd and Mecel Properties Ltd, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties including, but not necessarily limited to interest rate risks associated with variable interest rates, shifts in local real estate market conditions; market-based competition; the inability to fully lease rental properties; facility performance related to unforeseen or unknown structural, mechanical and/or electrical systems failures; unexpected increases in property rehabilitation costs; new government regulations; and tenant credit and default risks.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
1. Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
The Company’s Management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the Company and its subsidiaries. Management has designed such controls and procedures to (a) give reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and (b) ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to Management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on the evaluation, the aforementioned officers concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are working effectively.
2. Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter.
As a non-accelerated filer, the Company is evaluating actions necessary to comply with Section 404 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act with respect to its internal control over financial reporting.
33
The Company continues to assess the internal control environment, control designs and operating effectiveness, to ensure no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses exist. The Company also continues to monitor the potential changes to the requirements of the Act for non-accelerated filers.
34
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Legal Proceedings
Surplec, Inc.
On April 30, 2007, Surplec, Inc., (“Surplec”), the supplier of a transformer for a substation constructed by MPS in connection with a 42 MW wind project owned by Evergreen Wind Power, LLC, brought suit against MPS, UPC Wind Management LLC, and Evergreen Wind Power, LLC, (collectively “Defendants”) in the United States District Court District of Maine, (located in Bangor, Maine) seeking collection of approximately $227,795 it claims is still owed for the transformer, plus interest, attorney fees and punitive damages in a stated amount. MPS had contracted with Surplec to purchase a 30/40/50 MVA Transformer (“the Transformer”). Surplec alleged that MPS breached the contract and comitted fraud by failing to pay Surplec the third and final installment and shipping charges for the Transformer and Defendants’ use of the Transformer constitutes conversion. MPS has denied these allegations.
On June 21, 2007, MPS filed a Counterclaim against Surplec seeking an award of $199,000 (the amount MPS has already paid for the Transformer) as well as consequential and incidental damages. MPS alleged that Surplec failed to deliver the Transformer by the date indicated in the Contract and that the Transformer delivered was defective and nonconforming.
MPS has previously collected from Evergreen approximately $200,000 that would have been paid to Surplec had Surplec complied with its contractual obligations. MPS will continue to hold this amount pending the outcome of this litigation. MPS has recorded this amount under “Miscellaneous Liabilities” pending the outcome of this litigation. MPS believes that the claims for attorney fees and punitive damages are without merit under Maine law, and in any event such damages are not susceptible to estimation. MPS will vigorously defend against the claims made by Surplec and will continue to pursue its counter claims against the supplier. MPS cannot predict the outcome of this litigation but is reasonably confident that it will prevail. To this end, MPS anticipates seeking dismissal of Surplec’s claims for attorney fees and punitive damages.
Regulatory Matters
Notice of Inquiry Regarding Allowance of Electric Utilities in Maine to Reenter Energy Supply Business
On July 25, 2007, the Maine Public Utilities Commission issued a Notice of Inquiry (“NOI”) regarding the reentry of electric utilities into the energy supply business. The NOI was issued based on a State of Maine Legislative Resolve that directs the MPUC to undertake a review of the issues involved with transmission and distribution (“T&D”) utilities entering the energy supply business. The Resolve specifies that for purposes of the review, “energy supply business” includes owning, operating or having an interest in electric generation facilities, load management activities or demand-side management activities. The Resolve requires that the MPUC submit a report containing its findings and recommendations for further action and legislation to implement its recommendations to the Joint Standing Committee on Utilities and Energy no later than January 15, 2008. The MPUC initiated this Inquiry to obtain information, viewpoints and recommendations from interested persons on the issues raised in the Resolve. MPS will actively participate in the NOI process.
MPUC Approves the Pass-Through of Retail Transmission Rates to MPS Retail Jurisdictional Customers, and the Increase to DSM Mil Rate, MPUC Docket No. 2003-516
Per agreement with the Maine Public Utilities Commission, the new transmission rates for retail customers were put into retail rates on July 1, 2007. These rates were approved by the MPUC on June 27, 2007. Per this filing, the DSM mil rate was increased by 16.7%, or approximately $110,000, and the retail transmission rate was increased by 10.2%, or approximately $345,000.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 2007 Open Access Transmission Tariff Formula Rate Filing
On May 21, 2007, MPS filed its updated rates under the 2007 Open Access Transmission Tariff (“OATT”) formula pursuant to Docket ER00-1053 for both wholesale and retail customers. The revenue increases were approximately $54,000 and $345,000, respectively. These new transmission rates are subject to a customer refund that may occur as a result of the proceeding and potential settlement negotiations.
35
Stakeholder Initiative Regarding the Competitiveness and Reliability of the Northern Maine Power Grid
In November 2006, the MPUC issued an Order in the Docket opened for the purpose of selecting a new standard offer provider for the Company’s service territory for the period beginning January 1, 2007. The then-existing Standard Offer arrangement was due to expire on December 31, 2006. The MPUC’s November 16, 2006, Order stated that it had received two bids from a single supplier. Based on this, the MPUC concluded that northern Maine lacked a competitive power market and directed the Company to furnish default Standard Offer Service for the fourteen-month period beginning January 1, 2007. On December 18, 2006, the MPUC granted reconsideration of its November 16, 2006, Order and awarded the Standard Offer contract to WPS Energy, Inc. (now known as Integrys Energy Services, Inc.), the incumbent supplier.
As a result of the MPUC’s determination regarding the absence of a competitive power market, and also in an effort to deal with the system reliability issues raised by the Company’s unsuccessful bid to secure a certificate for the construction of a new transmission line, the MPUC held a three-day stakeholders conference in mid-December 2006, in an attempt to resolve, on a collaborative basis, the issues raised in these cases. As a result of this effort, two parallel initiatives have been launched:
(a) the stakeholders were asked to develop a protocol allowing for the possibility of generation suppliers obtaining long-term power delivery commitments through the Standard Offer process and not through the Company. This could encourage the construction of new generation in the Company’s service territory, and/or secure the availability of existing on-system generating sources on a long-term (multi-year) basis. The Company cannot at this time predict whether all of the stakeholders will reach agreement on any such protocol initiative, or whether it will be finalized and accepted by the MPUC;
(b) the stakeholders were asked to address the feasibility of one or more proposals for transmission projects interconnecting the northern Maine grid with the ISO New England grid, possibly by means of a tap into the MEPCO 345 kV transmission line that connects the high voltage systems of Maine and New Brunswick, Canada.
The Company, in early 2007, announced that it has joined with Central Maine Power Company in an effort to determine the feasibility of such a line.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Risk Factors identified in Item 1A. of MAM’s 2006 Form 10-K are incorporated herein by reference. The following risk factors include new risk factors identified during the quarter, as well as risk factors that have changed materially since year-end.
Liquidity and Capital Formation Risk
MAM’s current liabilities of $17.5 million as of June 30, 2007, exceed its current assets of $15.2 million by $2.3 million, exposing MAM to liquidity concerns in the upcoming year. Of these current liabilities, $6.0 million represents short-term borrowings, including the MPS line of credit with Bank of America. MAM has taken steps to mitigate this short-term risk before and after year-end, including identification of options to reduce or defer costs. Based on these steps and current financial projections, MAM has sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations for the foreseeable future.
In the mid-to-long-term, Management expects MAM’s cash flow to significantly improve, with MPS’s recovery of deferred fuel costs currently deferred by MPS. Until 2007, the cash expenditures for deferred fuel exceeded the recovery of stranded costs. With the expiration of the Wheelabrator-Sherman contract in December 2006, this position has reversed, and recovery of stranded costs is exceeding the cash outflows. These stranded cost free cash flows are being used, in part, to retire debt and pay for capital expenditures.
Equity Price Risk
The Maricor Group and its subsidiaries incurred equity price risk when it bought the stock of certain of its subsidiaries. Part of the consideration was MAM stock. In the event that the price of MAM common stock was below a specified price when the seller wished to dispose of it, The Maricor Group (or the applicable subsidiary) agreed to pay the difference. There were 12,603 shares outstanding pursuant to this kind of agreement at June 30, 2007. At a market price of $26.85 per share at June 30, 2007, the total exposure is approximately $180,000. A $1 increase in MAM’s share price would decrease this exposure by approximately $13,000. A $1 decrease in MAM’s share price would increase this exposure by $13,000.
Divestiture of The Maricor Group New England, Inc.
The Maricor Group New England, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of The Maricor Group, is currently being held for sale as well as transitioning longer term contracts to other providers. During this process, transitions of some contracts may
36
require additional payments to accommodate their transition. In addition, costs associated with terminating obligations or transitioning contracts in progress may require additional loss accruals. MAM is taking every precaution to facilitate smooth contract transitions for customers, while minimizing our legal liabilities.
Divestiture of Maricor Technologies, Inc.
With the divestiture of substantially all of the assets of MTI, the franchise and competition risks associated with unregulated software technology disclosed in MAM’s 2006 Form 10-K are eliminated. The risks associated with technological obsolescence are also significantly reduced as a result of this divestiture.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At the 2007 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of Maine & Maritimes Corporation held on May 8, 2007, two matters were voted upon.
First was the uncontested election of the following directors for terms ending in 2010, with the following result:
|
|
|
|
| Total Shares |
| |
|
| For |
| Withheld |
| Voted |
|
Richard G. Daigle |
| 1,332,205 |
| 75,170 |
| 1,407,375 |
|
David N. Felch |
| 1,339,111 |
| 68,264 |
| 1,407,375 |
|
Brian N. Hamel |
| 1,339,180 |
| 68,195 |
| 1,407,375 |
|
Second, shareholders were asked to approve the ratification of the appointment of Vitale, Caturano & Company as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, as appointed by the Board of Directors.
| Ratification of |
| |
|
| Vitale, Caturano & Company |
|
For |
| 1,343,148 |
|
Against |
| 23,900 |
|
Abstentions |
| 40,327 |
|
Total Shares Voted |
| 1,407,375 |
|
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are attached:
· Exhibit 31 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
· Exhibit 32 Certification of Financial Reports Pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350
37
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
MAINE & MARITIMES CORPORATION
(Registrant)
Date: August 10, 2007
/s/ Randi J. Arthurs |
|
Randi J. Arthurs | |
Vice President and Controller |
38