UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) |
| | |
ý | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | |
| | For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 |
| | |
| | OR |
| | |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-50689
BH/RE, L.L.C.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
NEVADA | | 84-1622334 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction | | (I.R.S. Employer |
of Incorporation or Organization) | | Identification Number) |
| | |
3667 Las Vegas Boulevard South | | |
Las Vegas, Nevada | | 89109 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(702) 785-5555
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. (See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer o | | Non-accelerated filer ý |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
BH/RE, L.L.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Index
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BH/RE, L.L.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(amounts in thousands)
| | March 31, | | December 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
ASSETS | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 47,475 | | $ | 41,419 | |
Receivables, net | | 16,969 | | 19,793 | |
Inventories | | 1,822 | | 2,165 | |
Prepaid expenses | | 5,144 | | 4,913 | |
Deposits and other current assets | | 2,105 | | 3,058 | |
Total current assets | | 73,515 | | 71,348 | |
| | | | | |
Property and equipment, net | | 487,543 | | 485,746 | |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | | 81,682 | | 87,787 | |
Other assets, net | | 8,824 | | 9,614 | |
Total assets | | $ | 651,564 | | $ | 654,495 | |
| | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | |
Current portion of long-term debt | | $ | 3,962 | | $ | 2,671 | |
Accounts payable | | 2,993 | | 3,359 | |
Accrued payroll and related | | 11,158 | | 13,373 | |
Accrued interest payable | | 8,172 | | 6,896 | |
Accrued taxes | | 3,127 | | 2,994 | |
Accrued expenses | | 5,317 | | 6,183 | |
Deposits | | 5,030 | | 4,563 | |
Other current liabilities | | 6,016 | | 6,159 | |
Due to affiliates | | 2,023 | | 1,591 | |
Total current liabilities | | 47,798 | | 47,789 | |
| | | | | |
Long-term debt, less current portion | | 608,371 | | 604,877 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | 4,224 | | 4,229 | |
Total liabilities | | 660,393 | | 656,895 | |
| | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Minority interest | | 12,892 | | 13,863 | |
| | | | | |
Members’ equity (deficit): | | | | | |
Member’s equity | | 21,500 | | 21,500 | |
Accumulated deficit | | (43,221 | ) | (37,763 | ) |
Total members’ equity (deficit) | | (21,721 | ) | (16,263 | ) |
Total liabilities and members’ equity (deficit) | | $ | 651,564 | | $ | 654,495 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
BH/RE, L.L.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(amounts in thousands)
| | Three Months Ended | | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, 2006 | | March 31, 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Operating revenues: | | | | | |
Casino | | $ | 29,825 | | $ | 32,913 | |
Hotel | | 29,194 | | 29,237 | |
Food and beverage | | 16,651 | | 19,319 | |
Other | | 4,144 | | 4,393 | |
Gross revenues | | 79,814 | | 85,862 | |
Promotional allowances | | (6,333 | ) | (6,643 | ) |
Net revenues | | 73,481 | | 79,219 | |
| | | | | |
Operating costs and expenses: | | | | | |
Casino | | 17,887 | | 17,458 | |
Hotel | | 9,915 | | 9,056 | |
Food and beverage | | 11,806 | | 12,939 | |
Other | | 2,324 | | 2,342 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 17,645 | | 17,500 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 5,691 | | 5,870 | |
| | 65,268 | | 65,165 | |
| | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | 8,213 | | 14,054 | |
| | | | | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | | (14,646 | ) | (13,635 | ) |
Minority interest in income (loss) | | 971 | | (63 | ) |
Loss on warrant valuation | | 4 | | — | |
| | (13,671 | ) | (13,698 | ) |
| | | | | |
Pre-tax income (loss) | | (5,458 | ) | 356 | |
Provision for income taxes | | — | | — | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (5,458 | ) | $ | 356 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
BH/RE, L.L.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(amounts in thousands)
| | Three Months Ended | | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, 2006 | | March 31, 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (5,458 | ) | $ | 356 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 5,691 | | 5,870 | |
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs | | 1,695 | | 1,727 | |
Minority interest in income (loss) | | (971 | ) | 63 | |
Change in value of warrants | | 102 | | (168 | ) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
Receivables, net | | 2,824 | | (1,613 | ) |
Inventories and prepaid expenses | | 112 | | 79 | |
Other assets | | 1,097 | | (174 | ) |
Accounts payable | | (365 | ) | 188 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | (916 | ) | 5,900 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | 3,811 | | 12,228 | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
Purchases of property and equipment | | (7,213 | ) | (2,013 | ) |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | | 6,105 | | 1,657 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (1,108 | ) | (356 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
Payable-in-kind interest added to debt principal | | 4,084 | | — | |
Payments under CUP financing | | (337 | ) | (403 | ) |
Payments under bank facility | | (394 | ) | — | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 3,353 | | (403 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents: | | | | | |
Increase in cash and cash equivalents | | 6,056 | | 11,469 | |
Balance, beginning of period | | 41,419 | | 37,016 | |
Balance, end of period | | $ | 47,475 | | $ | 48,485 | |
| | | | | |
Supplemental cash flow disclosures: | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest | | $ | 7,907 | | $ | 7,448 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
BH/RE, L.L.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Organization
BH/RE, L.L.C. (“BH/RE” or “the Company”) is a holding company that owns 85% of EquityCo, L.L.C. (“EquityCo”). The remaining 15% of EquityCo is owned by a subsidiary of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. (“Starwood”). MezzCo, L.L.C. (“MezzCo”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of EquityCo, and OpBiz, L.L.C. (“OpBiz”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of MezzCo. 50% of BH/RE’s voting membership interests are held by each of Robert Earl and Douglas P. Teitelbaum, and BH/RE’s equity membership interests are held 40.75% by BH Casino and Hospitality LLC I (“BHCH I”), 18.50% by BH Casino and Hospitality LLC II (“BHCH II”) (collectively “BHCH”) and 40.75% by OCS Consultants, Inc. (“OCS”).
BH/RE and its subsidiaries were formed to acquire, operate and renovate the Aladdin Resort and Casino (the “Aladdin”) located in Las Vegas, Nevada. OpBiz, an indirect subsidiary of BH/RE, completed the acquisition of the Aladdin on September 1, 2004 and has begun a renovation project which, when complete, will transform the Aladdin into the Planet Hollywood Resort and Casino (the “PH Resort”). In connection with the renovation of the Aladdin, OpBiz has entered into an agreement with Planet Hollywood International, Inc. (“Planet Hollywood”) and certain of its subsidiaries to, among other things, license Planet Hollywood’s trademarks, memorabilia and other intellectual property. OpBiz has also entered into an agreement with Sheraton Operating Corporation (“Sheraton”), a subsidiary of Starwood, pursuant to which Sheraton provides hotel management, marketing and reservation services for the hotel (the “Hotel”) that comprises a portion of the PH Resort.
BH/RE is a Nevada limited liability company and was organized on March 31, 2003. BH/RE was formed by BHCH and OCS. BHCH is controlled by Douglas P. Teitelbaum, a managing principal of Bay Harbour Management, L.C. (“Bay Harbour Management”). BHCH was formed by Mr. Teitelbaum for the purpose of holding investments in BH/RE by funds managed by Bay Harbour Management. Bay Harbour Management is an investment management firm. OCS is wholly owned and controlled by Robert Earl and holds Mr. Earl’s investment in BH/RE. Mr. Earl is the founder, chairman and chief executive officer of Planet Hollywood and Mr. Teitelbaum is a director of Planet Hollywood. Collectively, Mr. Earl, a trust for the benefit of Mr. Earl’s children and affiliates of Bay Harbour Management, own substantially all of the equity of Planet Hollywood. Mr. Earl disclaims beneficial ownership of any equity of Planet Hollywood owned by the trust.
Acquisition of the Aladdin
Aladdin Gaming, L.L.C. (“Aladdin Gaming”), which was a debtor-in-possession under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, commenced its bankruptcy case in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada, Southern Division on September 28, 2001. On April 23, 2003, OpBiz and Aladdin Gaming entered into a purchase agreement pursuant to which OpBiz agreed to acquire the Aladdin. Under the purchase agreement and pursuant to an order of the Bankruptcy Court, Aladdin Gaming conducted an auction to sell the Aladdin. On June 20, 2003, the Bankruptcy Court declared OpBiz the winner of that auction and, on August 29, 2003, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming Aladdin Gaming’s plan of reorganization and authorizing Aladdin Gaming to complete the sale of the Aladdin to OpBiz under the purchase agreement. On September 1, 2004, OpBiz acquired substantially all of the real and personal property owned or used by Aladdin Gaming to operate the Aladdin, and received $15 million of working capital from Aladdin Gaming, including $25.7 million of cash. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and, accordingly, the purchase price and working capital adjustments have been allocated to the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The working capital adjustment was determined based on the closing balance sheet on August 31, 2004. OpBiz paid the purchase price for the Aladdin by issuing new secured notes to Aladdin Gaming’s secured creditors and assumed various contracts and leases entered into by Aladdin Gaming in connection with its operation of the Aladdin and certain of Aladdin Gaming’s liabilities, including Aladdin Gaming’s energy service obligation to the third party owner of the central utility plant that supplies hot and cold water and emergency power to the Aladdin. At the time of purchase, the energy service obligation was $34.0 million. Upon the completion of the Aladdin acquisition, OpBiz issued $510 million of new secured notes to Aladdin Gaming’s secured creditors under an Amended and Restated Loan and Facilities Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a group of lenders and The Bank of New York, Asset Solutions Division, as administrative and collateral agent. OpBiz also simultaneously made a $14 million cash payment to those secured creditors, which reduced the principal amount of the notes to $496 million and obtained a release of the lien on a four-acre parcel of undeveloped property that OpBiz also acquired from Aladdin Gaming (the “Timeshare Land”). On December 10, 2004, OpBiz entered into a Timeshare Purchase Agreement with Westgate Resorts, LTD. (“Westgate”), whereby OpBiz agreed to sell approximately four acres of the Timeshare Land to Westgate, who plans to develop, market, manage and sell timeshare units on the land. The Credit Agreement also requires that OpBiz provide either cash or a letter of credit in the aggregate amount of $90 million to fund the costs of the planned renovations to the Aladdin. In August 2004, MezzCo issued $87 million of senior secured notes to a group of purchasers. The net proceeds of this financing were used to make the $14 million payment described above, to pay certain costs and expenses of BH/RE and its subsidiaries and affiliates related to the acquisition of the Aladdin, and to provide OpBiz with a
6
portion of the funds necessary to meet its obligations regarding the planned renovations to the Aladdin.
The purchase agreement also provided that OpBiz assume substantially all of Aladdin Gaming’s pre-petition contracts and leases and any post-petition contracts or leases to which OpBiz does not object. In addition, the purchase agreement provided that OpBiz offer employment to all of Aladdin Gaming’s employees, other than executive management, on terms and conditions substantially similar to their previous employment terms and conditions.
Plan of Operations
OpBiz is currently conducting a renovation project which, when complete, will transform the Aladdin into the PH Resort. In connection with the renovation of the Aladdin, OpBiz has entered into an agreement with Planet Hollywood and certain of its subsidiaries to, among other things, license Planet Hollywood’s trademarks, memorabilia and other intellectual property. OpBiz has also entered into an agreement with Sheraton, a subsidiary of Starwood, pursuant to which Sheraton provides hotel management, marketing and reservation services for the Hotel that comprises a portion of the PH Resort.
Interim Financial Statements (unaudited)
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the management of BH/RE, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. BH/RE believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods have been made. The results for the three months ended March 31, 2006, are not indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2005, included in BH/RE’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2006.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates
The condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain policies, including the determination of bad debt reserves, the estimated useful lives assigned to assets, asset impairment, insurance reserves and the calculation of liabilities, require that management apply significant judgment in defining the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Management’s judgments are based on historical experience, terms of existing contracts, observance of trends in the gaming industry and information available from other outside sources. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from our estimates. To provide an understanding of the methodology management applies, BH/RE’s significant accounting policies and basis of presentation are discussed below, as well as in the management’s discussion and analysis.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, as well as short-term investments with original maturities not in excess of 90 days.
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents
Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist of approximately $81.7 million and $87.8 million as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, the majority of which will be applied toward the remaining cash commitments for the planned renovations to the Aladdin.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable, including casino and hotel receivables, are typically non-interest bearing and are initially recorded at cost. An estimated allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained to reduce the receivables to their carrying amount, which approximates fair value. BH/RE estimates the allowance for doubtful accounts by applying standard reserve percentages to aged account balances under a specific dollar amount and specifically analyzes the collectibility of each account with a balance over the specified dollar amount, based on the age of the account, the customer’s financial condition, collection history and any other known information.
7
Inventories
Inventories consist of food and beverage, retail merchandise and operating supplies, and are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out and specific identification methods.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Recurring repairs and maintenance costs, including items that are replaced routinely in the casino, hotel and food and beverage departments which do not meet the Company’s capitalization policy of $10,000, are expensed as incurred. The Company has established its capital expense policy to be reflective of its individual ongoing repairs and maintenance programs. Gains or losses on dispositions of property and equipment are included in the determination of income. Property and equipment are generally depreciated over the following estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis:
Buildings | | 40 years | |
Building improvements | | 15 to 40 years | |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | | 3 to 7 years | |
Property and equipment and other long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” For assets to be disposed of, the asset to be sold is recognized at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs of disposal. Fair value for assets to be disposed of is estimated based on comparable asset sales, solicited offers or a discounted cash flow model.
Property and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist. If an indicator of impairment exists, the estimated future cash flows of the asset, on an undiscounted basis, are compared to the carrying value of the asset. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying value, no impairment is indicated. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, then impairment is measured based on fair value compared to carrying value, with fair value typically based on a discounted cash flow model.
The property and equipment and other long-lived assets that BH/RE obtained in the acquisition of the Aladdin were appraised by an independent third party. Property and equipment and the related accumulated depreciation amounts, as well as certain intangible assets recorded in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, are based on the independent third party appraisal.
Debt Issuance Costs
Debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the issuance of long-term debt are capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the expected terms of the related debt agreements using the effective interest method and are included in other assets on BH/RE’s consolidated balance sheets. Debt issuance costs, net of the related amortization, approximated $6.7 million and $7.0 million as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
Intangible Assets
In connection with the purchase of the Aladdin and as a result of an independent appraisal of the assets purchased, BH/RE recorded intangible assets, which consist of a customer list and trade name. The customer list was valued at approximately $2.7 million at the time of purchase and at March 31, 2006, had a net book value of approximately $1.6 million. The trade name was valued at approximately $1.0 million at the time of purchase and was fully amortized at March 31, 2006. The customer list is being amortized using the straight-line method over a useful life of 4 years.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
As further consideration to the lenders under the Credit Agreement, BH/RE has issued warrants to purchase membership interests held by BH/RE in EquityCo. BH/RE accounts for the outstanding warrants in EquityCo as embedded derivative instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.”
In conjunction with the Mezzanine Financing, MezzCo issued warrants to purchase membership interests in the fully diluted equity of MezzCo which contain a net cash settlement, and therefore are accounted for in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock”. Both SFAS No. 133 and EITF 00-19 require that the warrants be recognized as liabilities, with changes in fair value affecting net income.
8
Revenue Recognition and Promotional Allowances
Casino revenues are recognized as the net win from gaming activities, which is the difference between gaming wins and losses. Hotel revenue recognition criteria are generally met at the time of occupancy. Food and beverage revenue recognition criteria are generally met at the time of service. Deposits for future hotel occupancy or food and beverage services are recorded as deferred income until revenue recognition criteria are met. Cancellation fees for hotel and food and beverage services are recognized upon cancellation by the customer as defined by a written contract entered into with the customer. All other revenues are recognized as the service is provided. Revenues include the retail value of food, beverage, rooms, entertainment and merchandise provided on a complimentary basis to customers. Such complimentary amounts are then deducted from revenues as promotional allowances on BH/RE’s consolidated statements of operations. The estimated departmental costs of providing such promotional allowances are included in casino costs and expenses and consist of the following (amounts in thousands).:
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Rooms | | $ | 982 | | $ | 857 | |
Food and Beverage | | 2,525 | | 2,463 | |
Other | | 337 | | 186 | |
Total cost of promotional allowances | | $ | 3,844 | | $ | 3,506 | |
Slot Club Program
The Aladdin’s slot club members earn points based on gaming activity, which can be redeemed for cash. A liability is recorded for the estimated cost of the outstanding points accrued under the slot club program. The accrued slot club point liability was approximately $1.4 million and $1.7 million as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and included in selling, general and administrative costs and expenses. Advertising costs totaled approximately $1.2 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Income Taxes
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the operations of BH/RE and its controlled subsidiaries: EquityCo, MezzCo, and OpBiz. BH/RE and EquityCo are limited liability companies and are taxed as partnerships for federal income tax purposes. MezzCo has elected to be taxed as a corporation for federal income tax purposes. OpBiz, a wholly owned subsidiary of MezzCo, will be treated as a division of MezzCo for federal income tax purposes, and accordingly, will also be subject to federal income taxes.
MezzCo and OpBiz account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. SFAS 109 requires the recognition of deferred income tax assets, net of applicable reserves, related to net operating loss carryforwards and certain temporary differences. The standard requires recognition of future tax benefits to the extent that realization of such benefits are more likely than not. Otherwise, a valuation allowance is applied.
Membership Interests
As of March 31, 2006, BH/RE’s membership interests had not been unitized and BH/RE’s members do not presently intend to unitize these membership interests. Accordingly, management of BH/RE has excluded earnings per share data required pursuant to SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” because management believes that such disclosures would not be meaningful to the financial statement presentation.
The Company has entered into various employment agreements, as amended, with several executives. The employment agreements have initial terms of two to five years. The employment agreements provide that the executives will receive a base salary with either mandatory increases or annual adjustments and annual bonus payments. In addition, depending on the terms of the employment agreements, these executives are entitiled to options to purchase between 0.2% and 5% of the equity of MezzCo.
9
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
SFAS No. 123(R)
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), which is a revision to SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB No. 25”) and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” Among other items, SFAS No. 123(R) requires the recognition of compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments, including employee stock options and restricted stock, granted to employees.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using the “modified prospective” method, in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date (a) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date.
SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow. This requirement reduced net operating cash flows and increased net financing cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Accounting for stock-based compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) requiring that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the operating expenses. The cost is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity award). Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for share-based compensation to employees in accordance with APB No. 25, and related interpretations. The Company also followed the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure.” The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method and, accordingly, financial statement amounts for prior periods presented in this Form 10-Q have not been restated to reflect the fair value method of recognizing compensation cost relating to non-qualified stock options.
There was $0.1 million of compensation cost related to non-qualified stock options recognized in operating results (included in selling, general and administrative expenses) for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility trends as well as implied future volatility observations as determined by independent third parties. In determining the expected life of the option grants, the Company used historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination behavior. The expected term represents an estimate of the time options are expected to remain outstanding. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The following table sets forth the assumptions used to determine compensation cost for the Company’s non-qualified stock options consistent with the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R).
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 | |
Weighted-average assumptions: | | | |
Expected stock price volatility | | 36 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | | 3.76 | % |
Expected option life (years) | | 7 | |
Expected annual dividend yield | | — | % |
Under APB No. 25 there was no compensation cost recognized for the Company’s non-qualified stock options awarded in the three months ended March 31, 2005 as these non-qualified stock options had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying stock at the grant date. The following table sets forth pro forma information as if compensation cost had been determined consistent with the requirements of SFAS No. 123:
10
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 | |
| | (Amounts in thousands) | |
Net income: | | | |
As reported | | $ | 356 | |
Deduct: compensation expense under fair value-based method (net of tax) | | (45 | ) |
Pro forma | | $ | 311 | |
The following sets forth fair value per share information, including related assumptions, used to determine compensation cost consistent with the requirements of SFAS No. 123:
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 | |
| | | |
Weighted-average fair value per share of options granted during the period (estimated on grant date using Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model) | | $ | 235.28 | |
| | | |
Weighted-average assumptions: | | | |
Expected stock price volatility | | 36 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | | 3.76 | % |
Expected option life (years) | | 7 | |
Expected annual dividend yield | | - | % |
| | | | |
At March 31, 2006, there was $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested non-qualified stock option awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of two years. The total fair value of options vested during the three months ended March 31, 2006 was $0.1 million.
3. RECEIVABLES
Accounts receivable consist of the following (in thousands):
| | March 31 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | |
Casino | | $ | 9,775 | | $ | 12,173 | |
Hotel | | 9,843 | | 8,470 | |
Other | | 2,290 | | 3,593 | |
| | 21,908 | | 24,236 | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | | (4,939 | ) | (4,443 | ) |
Receivables, net | | $ | 16,969 | | $ | 19,793 | |
4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment and the related accumulated depreciation consist of the following (in thousands):
| | March 31, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | |
Land | | $ | 97,979 | | $ | 97,979 | |
Building and improvements | | 367,234 | | 367,234 | |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | | 34,431 | | 34,194 | |
Construction in progress | | 21,661 | | 14,685 | |
| | 521,305 | | 514,092 | |
Accumulated depreciation | | (33,762 | ) | (28,346 | ) |
Property and equipment, net | | $ | 487,543 | | $ | 485,746 | |
The $98 million land value includes $29.5 million allocated to the Timeshare Land.
Depreciation expense was approximately $5.7 million and $5.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
11
respectively.
5. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
| | March 31, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | |
Term Loan A - $500 million senior notes, net of unamortized discount of $24,305 and $25,632 | | $ | 461,225 | | $ | 460,293 | |
Term Loan B - $10 million senior notes | | 11,220 | | 10,985 | |
Mezzanine senior secured subordinated notes, net of unamortized discount of $3,774 and $3,880 | | 107,911 | | 103,956 | |
Northwind Aladdin obligation under capital lease | | 31,977 | | 32,314 | |
Total long-term debt | | 612,333 | | 607,548 | |
Current portion of long-term debt | | (3,962 | ) | (2,671 | ) |
Total long-term debt, net | | $ | 608,371 | | $ | 604,877 | |
Credit Agreement
The Aladdin acquisition and the planned renovations were funded by the issuance of $510 million of secured notes to Aladdin Gaming’s secured creditors pursuant to a Credit Agreement. OpBiz’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by liens on all of its assets, including a mortgage on its real property, the Hotel, the Casino and the Theater for the Performing Arts (“TPA”), and security interests in its accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and intangible assets, excluding the Timeshare Land. The Credit Agreement is guaranteed by MezzCo and MezzCo secured its guarantee by pledging its membership interests in OpBiz to the lenders. The Credit Agreement matures on August 31, 2010.
The loans under the Credit Agreement are evidenced by $500 million of Term Loan A notes and $10 million of Term Loan B notes. Upon issuance of the notes, BH/RE simultaneously made a $14 million cash payment to the holders of the Term Loan A notes to reduce the principal amount of the Term Loan A notes to $486 million and obtained a release of the lien on the Timeshare Land.
The scheduled principal payments on the Term Loan A notes are as follows:
• $1.25 million on the first day of each fiscal quarter during the period beginning on August 31, 2006 and ending on August 31, 2007;
• $3.75 million on the first day of each fiscal quarter during the period beginning on August 31, 2007 and ending on August 31, 2008;
• $5.0 million on the first day of each fiscal quarter during the period beginning on August 31, 2008 and ending on August 31, 2009;
• $6.25 million on the first day of each fiscal quarter during the period beginning on August 31, 2009 and ending on August 31, 2010;
• the then unpaid balance amount of Term Loan A notes on August 31, 2010.
OpBiz pays interest on the outstanding Term Loan A notes quarterly, in cash, at the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin that increases over time. Until the earlier of August 31, 2007 or OpBiz’s accumulation of certain permitted cash reserves, OpBiz’s interest payment will not exceed its quarterly earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), reduced by certain permitted reductions (as defined in the Credit Agreement), divided by a factor of 1.20. Interest on the Term Loan B notes will accrue at a rate of LIBOR plus 4% and will be added quarterly to the outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan B notes and will be paid when OpBiz pays off the Term Loan B notes. OpBiz is also required to pay an annual administrative fee and certain other fees and expenses of the lender under the Credit Agreement.
OpBiz is required to prepay amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement:
• with excess cash flow (as defined in the Credit Agreement) after certain permitted cash reserves are accumulated;
• in scheduled quarterly amounts beginning after August, 31, 2006;
• with certain amounts received in connection with the development of the Timeshare Land adjacent to the Desert Passage (as defined in the underlying agreement);
• with an amount equal to the difference between what should have been spent on renovation capital expenditures and what was
12
actually spent thereon if (i) an aggregate amount of $72.0 million is not spent on renovation capital expenditures by August 31, 2006, or (ii) an aggregate amount of $81.0 million is not spent on renovation capital expenditures by February 28, 2007 or (iii) an aggregate amount of $90.0 million is not spent on renovation capital expenditures by August 31, 2007; and
• with the proceeds of certain asset sales.
In particular, after OpBiz accumulates certain permitted cash reserves, OpBiz is required to pay 100% of its excess cash flow (as defined in the Credit Agreement) from operations to the lenders under the Credit Agreement. That percentage decreases to 75%, then 50%, if OpBiz meets certain targeted ratios of total debt to EBITDA, or certain leverage ratios, for any two consecutive fiscal quarters.
The Credit Agreement includes covenants that, among other things, restrict OpBiz’s ability to sell assets, make distributions to its owners, other than distributions for taxes, incur or prepay additional indebtedness, enter into transactions with affiliates, incur liens, make investments, make capital expenditures, develop the Timeshare Land adjacent to the Desert Passage and enter into material contracts. In addition, OpBiz is required to maintain certain levels of EBITDA that increase over time and, beginning August 31, 2007, maintain certain ratios of EBITDA to interest expense that increase over time and maintain certain leverage ratios that decrease over time.
The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, including a change of control of OpBiz, the occurrence of a default under the terms of any indebtedness of MezzCo, a default by OpBiz under the Hotel management contract or termination of Sheraton as the manager of the Hotel (unless OpBiz replaces Sheraton with another approved manager within 30 days of such termination), a default or termination of the Planet Hollywood license agreement and certain defaults under the agreements with Boulevard Invest or Northwind Aladdin.
BH/RE has issued warrants to purchase 2.94% of its ownership interest in EquityCo to the lenders under the Credit Agreement. The warrants can only be exercised upon the occurrence of (i) a liquidity event or distribution (such as through the sale of the hotel/casino); (ii) a public sale of equity securities of EquityCo, MezzCo or OpBiz; or (iii) payment in full of the obligations under the Credit Agreement. The warrants can either be settled in cash or in other membership interests upon exercise. The estimated fair value of the warrants was approximately $0.1 million as of March 31, 2006. These warrants are recorded separately from the related debt within other long-term liabilities.
Mezzanine Financing
In August 2004, MezzCo entered into a mezzanine financing transaction (the “Mezzanine Financing”) with a group of purchasers. Pursuant to the Mezzanine Financing, MezzCo issued $87 million of 16% Senior Secured Subordinated Notes and warrants to purchase 17,500 of its units representing membership interests equal to 17.5% of the fully diluted equity of MezzCo. The gross offering proceeds of the Mezzanine Financing were deposited into an escrow account and, in conjunction with the closing of the Aladdin acquisition, were used to (i) pay approximately $16.1 million of fees and expenses related to the acquisition of the Aladdin, (ii) fund the $14 million lien release payment required under the Credit Agreement, and (iii) fund a portion of the planned renovations to the Aladdin. The notes mature in August 2011 and accrue interest at a rate of 16% per annum. Interest on the notes is payable-in-kind or, at the option of MezzCo, in cash. The warrants are exercisable at any time, subject to the approval of the Nevada gaming authorities, at a purchase price of $0.01 per unit. Subject to the approval of the Nevada gaming authorities, the warrants may be exercised to purchase either voting or non-voting membership interests of MezzCo or a combination thereof. Currently, all of MezzCo’s voting membership interests are represented by units owned by EquityCo. In addition to customary anti-dilution protections, the number of units representing MezzCo membership interests issuable upon exercise of the warrants may be increased from time to time upon the occurrence of certain events as described in the warrants. The maximum aggregate increase is 24%, following which the warrants would represent rights to purchase 41.5% of the units representing the fully diluted equity of MezzCo. Holders of the warrants and any securities issued upon exercise of the warrants may require MezzCo to redeem such securities commencing in August 2011 at a redemption price based upon a formula set forth in the warrants. Starting in August 2008, in the event the Company fails to achieve certain operational thresholds, the holders of the MezzCo warrants, and securities issued upon exercise thereof, have the right to assume control of MezzCo and OpBiz and conduct a sale of the equity of, or all or substantially all of the assets of, either MezzCo or OpBiz provided that all Control Conditions (as defined in the Investor Rights Agreement) are met. These rights are subject to (i) repayment in full of all indebtedness that is senior to the notes (including all indebtedness of OpBiz under the Credit Agreement), (ii) certain covenants related to OpBiz’s ability to achieve targeted levels of EBITDA and (iii) the prior approval of the Nevada gaming authorities. These rights expire upon completion of a public offering by MezzCo or OpBiz. In connection with the Mezzanine Financing, OpBiz’s obligation to make expenditures on renovations to the Aladdin was increased from $90 million, as required under the Credit Agreement, to $100 million.
As of March 31, 2006, the MezzCo financing was recorded net of the unamortized balance of the put warrants of approximately $3.8 million. The estimated fair value of the warrants was approximately $4.1 million at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and is recorded separately from the related debt within other long-term liabilities.
13
Energy Services Agreement
Northwind Aladdin (“Northwind”), a third party, owns and operates a central utility plant on land leased from OpBiz. The plant supplies hot and cold water and emergency power to the Aladdin under a contract between Aladdin Gaming and Northwind. OpBiz has assumed the energy service agreement, which expires in 2020. Under the agreement, OpBiz is required to pay Northwind a monthly consumption charge, a monthly operational charge, a monthly debt service payment and a monthly return on equity payment. Payments under the Northwind agreement total approximately $0.5 million per month.
6. MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS
The non-voting interests in BH/RE are owned 40.75% by BHCH I, 18.50% by BHCH II and 40.75% by OCS and the voting interests are owned 50% by Douglas P. Teitelbaum and 50% by Robert Earl. BHCH is controlled by Mr. Teitelbaum, managing principal of Bay Harbour Management, an investment management firm. BHCH was formed by Mr. Teitelbaum for the purpose of holding investments in BH/RE by funds managed by Bay Harbour Management. OCS is wholly-owned and controlled by Mr. Earl and holds Mr. Earl’s investment in BH/RE. Mr. Earl is the founder, chairman and chief executive officer of Planet Hollywood and Mr. Teitelbaum is a director of Planet Hollywood. Collectively, Mr. Earl, a trust for the benefit of Mr. Earl’s children and affiliates of Bay Harbour Management, own substantially all of the equity of Planet Hollywood.
BH/RE owns 85% of the membership interests in EquityCo and Starwood owns 15%. MezzCo is a wholly owned subsidiary of EquityCo, and OpBiz is a wholly owned subsidiary of MezzCo. BH/RE and Starwood made total equity contributions of $20 million each in EquityCo to fund the costs of the planned renovations to the Aladdin. Starwood’s equity interest in EquityCo is reflected as minority interest in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. BH/RE recorded minority interest income (loss) related to the Starwood interests of approximately $1.0 million and $(0.1) million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
BH/RE has the option to purchase all of Starwood’s membership interests in EquityCo if OpBiz is entitled to terminate the hotel management contract between OpBiz and Sheraton as a result of a breach by Sheraton. Starwood can require EquityCo to purchase all of its membership interests in EquityCo if the hotel management contract is terminated for any reason other than in accordance with its terms or as the result of a breach by Sheraton. In addition, BH/RE and Starwood entered into a registration rights agreement with respect to their membership interests in EquityCo.
7. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Mr. Jess Ravich
Jess Ravich, a Manager of OpBiz, is CEO and indirect controlling shareholder of Libra Securities, LLC, an investment banking firm (“Libra Securities”). Libra Securities acted as placement agent for MezzCo, L.L.C. in the placement of the Mezzanine Financing and was paid a placement fee of $4,350,000.
Mr. Ravich holds a note convertible into 25% of the equity in PDS Gaming, a leasing and finance company specializing in gaming equipment. Conversion of the note is subject to approval of appropriate gaming regulators in the jurisdictions in which PDS Gaming does business. PDS Gaming entered into a gaming equipment lease with OpBiz on December 22, 2004, for a 48-month term with payments of approximately $137,500 per month. Libra Securities raised financing for PDS Gaming to allow it to purchase the equipment underlying the lease and received a placement fee for its services.
Planet Hollywood Licensing Agreement
OpBiz, Planet Hollywood and certain of Planet Hollywood’s subsidiaries have entered into a licensing agreement pursuant to which OpBiz received a non-exclusive, irrevocable license to use various “Planet Hollywood” trademarks and service marks. Under the licensing agreement, OpBiz also has the right, but not the obligation, to open a Planet Hollywood restaurant and one or more Planet Hollywood retail shops under a separate restaurant agreement with Planet Hollywood. OpBiz will pay Planet Hollywood a quarterly licensing fee of 1.75% of OpBiz’s non-casino revenues. If OpBiz opens an attraction with paid admission using the Planet Hollywood marks or memorabilia prior to beginning operations as the PH Resort, it will pay Planet Hollywood a quarterly licensing fee of 1.75% of the revenues of the attraction until OpBiz begins operating as the PH Resort. The initial term of the licensing agreement will expire in 2028. OpBiz can renew the licensing agreement for three successive 10-year terms.
In addition to being a manager of BH/RE, Mr. Earl is the chief executive officer and chairman of the board of directors of Planet Hollywood. Similarly, Mr. Teitelbaum is a manager of BH/RE and a director of Planet Hollywood. Collectively, Mr. Earl, a trust for the benefit of Mr. Earl’s children and affiliates of Bay Harbour Management, own substantially all of the equity of Planet Hollywood. Mr. Earl disclaims beneficial ownership of any equity of Planet Hollywood owned by the trust.
14
Sheraton Hotel Management Contract
OpBiz and Sheraton have entered into a management contract pursuant to which Sheraton provides hotel management services to the Hotel, assists OpBiz in the management, operation and promotion of the Hotel and permits OpBiz to use the Sheraton brand and trademarks in the promotion of the Hotel. OpBiz pays Sheraton a monthly fee of 4% of gross Hotel revenue and certain food and beverage outlet revenues and 2% of rental income from third-party leases in the Hotel. The management contract has a 20-year term that commenced on the completion of the Aladdin acquisition and is subject to certain termination provisions by either OpBiz or Sheraton. Sheraton is a wholly owned subsidiary of Starwood, which has a 15% equity interest in EquityCo and has the right to appoint two members to the EquityCo board of managers. Starwood management fees totaled approximately $2.6 million and $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 respectively.
8. INCOME TAXES
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the operations of BH/RE and its controlled subsidiaries: EquityCo, MezzCo, and OpBiz. BH/RE and EquityCo are limited liability companies and are taxed as partnerships for federal income tax purposes. MezzCo has elected to be taxed as a corporation for federal income tax purposes. OpBiz, a wholly owned subsidiary of MezzCo, will be treated as a division of MezzCo for federal income tax purposes, and accordingly, will also be subject to federal income taxes.
MezzCo and OpBiz account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. SFAS 109 requires the recognition of deferred income tax assets, net of applicable reserves, related to net operating loss carryforwards and certain temporary differences. The standard requires recognition of future tax benefits to the extent that realization of such benefits are more likely than not. Otherwise, a valuation allowance is applied.
Management believes it is more likely than not that its net deferred tax asset will not be realized and has therefore recorded a valuation allowance against this net deferred tax asset.
The payable in-kind interest associated with the Mezzanine Financing is subject to the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 163(e)(5) as a high yield debt obligation with disqualified OID. As a result, a portion of the interest expense associated with the Mezzanine Financing is permanently non-deductible for tax purposes and the balance of the interest expense is only deductible when paid in cash. The deferred tax asset associated with the Mezzanine Financing remains fully reserved.
At December 31, 2005, OpBiz had a general business credit carryforward of approximately $0.7 million that expires in 2025 and a minimum tax credit carryforward of approximately $0.1 million. MezzCo and OpBiz have a valuation allowance at December 31, 2005 and 2004 recorded against tax benefits that are more likely than not unrealizable. The current tax receivable of $134,000 at March 31, 2006 represents recoverable taxes paid in a carryback period.
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
BH/RE is not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.
Employment Agreements
The Company has entered into various employment agreements, as amended, with several executives. The employment agreements have initial terms of two to five years. The employment agreements provide that the executives will receive a base salary with either mandatory increases or annual adjustments and annual bonus payments. In addition, depending on the terms of the employment agreements, these executives are entitiled to options to purchase between 0.2% and 5% of the equity of MezzCo.
Timeshare Purchase Agreement
On December 10, 2004, OpBiz entered into a Timeshare Purchase Agreement with Westgate Resorts, LTD. (“Westgate”), a Florida limited partnership, whereby OpBiz has agreed to sell approximately 4 acres of land adjacent to the Aladdin to Westgate, who plans to develop, market, manage and sell timeshare units on the land. Under the Timeshare Purchase Agreement, OpBiz will receive fees each year based on sales of timeshare units until the timeshare units are one hundred percent sold out.
Theater Lease
On December 16, 2004, OpBiz entered into a long-term lease agreement whereby CC Entertainment Theatrical-LV, LLC, succesor-in-interest to SFX Entertainment, Inc. pursuant to an assignment dated September 26, 2005 (“CCE”) will be renovating and leasing certain theaters and related areas located at the Aladdin. CCE will have the exclusive right to use, reconfigure, adapt, change
15
and operate the leased premises.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Set forth below is a discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of BH/RE and its subsidiaries for the periods covered in this report. The discussion of operations herein focuses on events and the revenues and expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2005.
The following management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements of BH/RE included in BH/RE’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2006, and the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes hereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain policies, including the determination of bad debt reserves, the estimated useful lives assigned to assets, asset impairment, insurance reserves and the calculation of liabilities, require that we apply significant judgment in defining the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Our judgments are based on historical experience, terms of existing contracts, observance of trends in the gaming industry and information available from other outside sources. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from our estimates. To provide an understanding of the methodology we apply, our significant accounting policies and basis of presentation are discussed below, as well as, where appropriate, in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Recurring repairs and maintenance costs, including items that are replaced routinely in the casino, hotel and food and beverage departments which do not meet our capitalization policy of $10,000, are expensed as incurred. We have established our capital expense policy to be reflective of our individual ongoing repairs and maintenance programs. Gains or losses on dispositions of property and equipment are included in the determination of income. Property and equipment are generally depreciated over the following estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis:
Buildings | | 40 years | |
Building improvements | | 15 to 40 years | |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | | 3 to 7 years | |
Property and equipment and other long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” For assets to be disposed of, the asset to be sold is recognized at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs of disposal. Fair value for assets to be disposed of is estimated based on comparable asset sales, solicited offers or a discounted cash flow model.
Property and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist. If an indicator of impairment exists, the estimated future cash flows of the asset, on an undiscounted basis, are compared to the carrying value of the asset. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying value, no impairment is indicated. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, then impairment is measured based on fair value compared to carrying value, with fair value typically based on a discounted cash flow model.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
BH/RE has issued warrants to provide further consideration to the holders of the Senior Notes and Mezzanine Financing. BH/RE accounts for the senior note warrants in EquityCo as embedded derivative instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”. The warrants issued in conjunction with the Mezzanine Financing contain a
16
net cash settlement, and therefore are accounted for in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock”. Both SFAS No. 133 and EITF 00-19 require that the warrants be recognized as liabilities, with changes in fair value affecting net income.
Revenue Recognition and Promotional Allowances
Casino revenues are recognized as the net win from gaming activities, which is the difference between gaming wins and losses. All other revenues are recognized as the service is provided. Revenues include the retail value of food, beverage, rooms, entertainment and merchandise provided on a complimentary basis to customers. Such complimentary amounts are then deducted from revenues as promotional allowances on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. The estimated departmental costs of providing such promotional allowances are included in casino costs and expenses.
Hotel revenue recognition criteria are generally met at the time of occupancy. Food and beverage revenue recognition criteria are generally met at the time of service. Deposits for future hotel occupancy or food and beverage services are recorded as deferred income until revenue recognition criteria are met. Cancellation fees for hotel and food and beverage services are recognized upon cancellation by the customer as defined by a written contract entered into with the customer.
Income Taxes
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the operations of BH/RE and its controlled subsidiaries: EquityCo, MezzCo, and OpBiz. BH/RE and EquityCo are limited liability companies and are taxed as partnerships for federal income tax purposes. MezzCo has elected to be taxed as a corporation for federal income tax purposes. OpBiz, a wholly owned subsidiary of MezzCo, will be treated as a division of MezzCo for federal income tax purposes, and accordingly, will also be subject to federal income taxes.
MezzCo and OpBiz account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. SFAS 109 requires the recognition of deferred income tax assets, net of applicable reserves, related to net operating loss carryforwards and certain temporary differences. The standard requires recognition of future tax benefits to the extent that realization of such benefits are more likely than not. Otherwise, a valuation allowance is applied.
Membership Interests
As of March 31, 2006, our membership interests had not been unitized and our members do not presently intend to unitize these membership interests. Accordingly, we have excluded earnings per membership unit data required pursuant to SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” because we believe that such disclosures would not be meaningful to the financial statement presentation.
The Company has entered into various employment agreements, as amended, with several executives. The employment agreements have initial terms of two to five years. The employment agreements provide that the executives will receive a base salary with either mandatory increases or annual adjustments and annual bonus payments. In addition, depending on the terms of the employment agreements, these executives are entitiled to options to purchase between 0.2% and 5% of the equity of MezzCo.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
SFAS No. 123(R)
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), which is a revision to SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB No. 25”) and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” Among other items, SFAS No. 123(R) requires the recognition of compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments, including employee stock options and restricted stock, granted to employees.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using the “modified prospective” method, in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date (a) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date.
17
SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow. This requirement reduced net operating cash flows and increased net financing cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Accounting for stock-based compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) requiring that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in operating expenses. The cost is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity award). Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for share-based compensation to employees in accordance with APB No. 25, and related interpretations. The Company also followed the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure.” The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method and, accordingly, financial statement amounts for prior periods presented in this Form 10-Q have not been restated to reflect the fair value method of recognizing compensation cost relating to non-qualified stock options.
There was $0.1 million of compensation cost related to non-qualified stock options recognized in operating results (included in selling, general and administrative expenses) for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility trends as well as implied future volatility observations as determined by independent third parties. In determining the expected life of the option grants, the Company used historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination behavior. The expected term represents an estimate of the time options are expected to remain outstanding. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The following table sets forth the assumptions used to determine compensation cost for the Company’s non-qualified stock options consistent with the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R):
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 | |
Weighted-average assumptions: | | | |
Expected stock price volatility | | 36 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | | 3.79 | % |
Expected option life (years) | | 7 | |
Expected annual dividend yield | | — | % |
Under APB No. 25 there was no compensation cost recognized for the Company’s non-qualified stock options awarded in the three months ended March 31, 2005 as these non-qualified stock options had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying stock at the grant date. The following table sets forth pro forma information as if compensation cost had been determined consistent with the requirements of SFAS No. 123.
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 | |
| | (Amounts in thousands) | |
Net income: | | | |
As reported | | $ | 356 | |
Deduct: compensation expense under fair value-based method (net of tax) | | (45 | ) |
Pro forma | | $ | 311 | |
The following sets forth fair value per share information, including related assumptions, used to determine compensation cost consistent with the requirements of SFAS No. 123:
18
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 | |
| | | |
Weighted-average fair value per share of options granted during the period (estimated on grant date using Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model) | | $ | 235.28 | |
| | | |
Weighted-average assumptions: | | | |
Expected stock price volatility | | 36 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | | 3.79 | % |
Expected option life (years) | | 7 | |
Expected annual dividend yield | | — | % |
| | | | |
At March 31, 2006, there was $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested non-qualified stock option awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of two years. The total fair value of options vested during the three months ended March 31, 2006 was $0.1 million.
Results of Operations
The following table highlights the results of operations of the Aladdin for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively (dollars in thousands, unaudited).
| | Three months ended March 31, | | Percent | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | Change | |
| | | | | | | |
Net revenues | | $ | 73,481 | | $ | 79,219 | | (7.2 | )% |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | |
Casino | | 17,887 | | 17,458 | | 2.5 | % |
Hotel | | 9,915 | | 9,056 | | 9.5 | % |
Food and beverage | | 11,806 | | 12,939 | | 8.8 | % |
Other | | 2,324 | | 2,342 | | (0.8 | )% |
Selling, general and administrative | | 17,645 | | 17,500 | | 0.8 | % |
Depreciation and amortization | | 5,691 | | 5,870 | | (3.0 | )% |
Operating income | | $ | 8,213 | | $ | 14,054 | | (41.6 | )% |
Net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006 declined when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2005. The renovation project, which is currently underway, was the primary reason for the decline in revenues throughout the property. Operating income and operating margin also declined as a result of the renovation project due to the level of disruption we are experiencing while the structural phase of the construction is underway.
The following table highlights the various sources of our revenues and expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively (dollars in thousands, unaudited).
19
| | Three months ended March 31, | | Percent | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | Change | |
| | | | | | | |
Casino revenues | | $ | 29,825 | | $ | 32,913 | | (9.4 | )% |
Casino expenses | | 17,887 | | 17,458 | | 2.5 | % |
Margin | | 40.0 | % | 47.0 | % | | |
| | | | | | | |
Hotel revenues | | $ | 29,194 | | $ | 29,237 | | (0.1 | )% |
Hotel expenses | | 9,915 | | 9,056 | | 9.5 | % |
Margin | | 66.0 | % | 69.0 | % | | |
| | | | | | | |
Food and beverage revenues | | $ | 16,651 | | $ | 19,319 | | (13.8 | )% |
Food and beverage expenses | | 11,806 | | 12,939 | | (8.8 | )% |
Margin | | 29.1 | % | 33.0 | % | | |
| | | | | | | |
Other revenues | | $ | 4,144 | | $ | 4,393 | | (5.7 | )% |
Other expenses | | 2,324 | | 2,342 | | (0.8 | )% |
Margin | | 43.9 | % | 46.7 | % | | |
| | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | $ | 17,645 | | $ | 17,500 | | 0.8 | % |
Percent of net revenues | | 24.0 | % | 22.1 | % | | |
Casino
Casino revenue is derived primarily from patrons wagering on slot machines, table games and other gaming activities. Table games generally include blackjack or twenty one, craps, baccarat and roulette. Other gaming activities include the race and sports books, poker and keno. Casino revenue is defined as the win from gaming activities, computed as the difference between gaming wins and losses.
Casino revenues vary from time-to-time due to general economic conditions, competition, popularity of entertainment offerings, table game hold, slot machine hold and occupancy percentages in the Hotel. Casino revenues also vary depending upon the amount of gaming activity, as well as variations in the odds for different games of chance. Casino revenue is recognized at the end of each gaming day.
Casino revenues decreased 9.4% to $29.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to $32.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Table games revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2006, decreased by approximately $1.5 million as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2005. The number of operational table units decreased 11% in connection with the renovation project with a resulting decrease in drop of 6%. Overall win percentage was comparable to prior year. Slot revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2006 decreased approximately $0.3 million when compared to the same three month period in prior year. Number of slot units on the floor decreased 19% with a resulting decrease in slot handle of 14%. Win per unit increased 19% offsetting the decrease in handle and resulting in an overall decrease in revenue of 1.5%. Combined revenues from the race and sports book, poker and keno decreased by $0.9 million or 44% when compared to the three month period ended March 31, 2005 primarily due to a decrease in race and sports book revenue driven by losses on the NFL finals and a decrease in revenue from the Superbowl when compared to previous year.
Casino expenses increased 2.5% to $17.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to $17.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Operating margin declined 7% when comparing the same three month periods. The increase in casino expenses and decline in operating margin were mainly attributable to the addition of promotional offers and events intended to maintain revenue during the renovation period. We expect that continued focus on events and promotional offers will help us drive traffic throughout the renovation and that we will experience a resulting decline in operating margin when compared to prior year.
Hotel
Hotel revenue is derived from rooms and suites rented to guests. “average daily rate” is an industry specific term used to define the average amount of revenue per rented room per day. “occupancy percentage” defines the total percentage of rooms occupied and is computed by dividing the number of rooms occupied by the total number of rooms available. Hotel revenue is recognized at the time the room is provided to the guest.
Hotel revenues of $29.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 were comparable to the three months ended March 31, 2005. Hotel occupancy increased 1.6% to 95.7% when compared to the same three month period in prior year. An offsetting decline in average daily rate to $131 compared to $133 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 resulted in consistent revenues. We were able to maintain hotel revenues during the renovation period due to continued strong demand for rooms in the Las Vegas market and the improved marketing channels of Starwood.
20
Hotel expenses increased 9.5% to $9.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to $9.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Operating margin declined 3% for the three month period ended March 31, 2006 when compared to the same three month period in previous year. The increase in expenses and resulting decline in operating margin were mainly attributable to an increase in payroll and benefit costs due to the implementation of the culinary union contract in October 2005.
Food and Beverage
Food and beverage revenues are derived from food and beverage sales in the restaurants, bars, room service, banquets and entertainment outlets. Food and beverage revenue is recognized at the time the food and/or beverage is provided to the guest.
Food and beverage revenues decreased 13.8% to $16.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to $19.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The decline in food revenue was the result of cover declines in all outlets due to construction disruption. Beverage revenue declines were directly attributed the closing of outlets for the construction. Those closed beverage outlets were replaced by portable casino bars that did not pick up the lost revenue.
Food and beverage expenses decreased 8.8% to $11.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to $12.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Operating margin declined 4% when compared to the same three month period in previous year. Food and beverage payroll expenses were also impacted by the addition of the culinary union contract in October 2005 but expense increases were more than offset by expense control measures including flexible staffing based on cover and revenue reductions during the renovation period.
Other
Other revenue includes entertainment sales, retail sales, telephone and other miscellaneous income and is recognized at the time the goods or services are provided to the guest.
Other revenues decreased 5.7% to $4.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to $4.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The decline in other revenue is primarily due to the loss of revenue from the showroom that was fully operational during the three months ended March 31, 2005. The showroom was closed for renovation in April 2005.
Other expenses remained consistent when comparing the same three month periods resulting in a decline in operating margin of 2.7%. Expenses related to the operation of a temporary casino lounge including a nightly band were absorbed to offset the loss of entertainment due to the showroom closing.
Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”)
SG&A expenses were consistent for the three months ended March 31, 2006, when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2005 at $17.6 million and $17.5 million respectively. As a percentage of net revenue, SG&A expenses increased to 24% for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as compared to 22% for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The increase in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenue was mainly due to maintenance of marketing and fixed administrative expenses on a greater than anticipated reduction in revenue. In reaction to the additional reduction in revenue, we have taken steps to reduce the level of marketing and fixed admin expenses for the remainder of 2006.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense of $5.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 declined when compared to $5.9 million in expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Asset additions resulting from the renovation project will not begin depreciating until construction is complete and they are placed in service.
Net Interest Expense
Net interest expense increased to $14.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to $13.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The increase in net interest expense is directly attributed to the increase in LIBOR for the comparable three month periods, which is used to calculate interest expense on the Credit Facility.
21
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following liquidity and capital resources discussion contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to our business, financial condition, results of operations, dispositions, acquisitions, expansion projects and our subsidiaries, which involve risks and uncertainties that cannot be predicted or quantified, and consequently, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied herein. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, financial market risks, the ability to maintain existing management, integration of acquisitions, competition within the gaming industry, the cyclical nature of the hotel business and gaming business, economic conditions, regulatory matters and litigation and other risks described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and projections about future events.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we generated cash flows from operating activities of approximately $3.8 million. We also had restricted cash and cash equivalents of approximately $81.7 million, which is designated to be used for costs associated with the renovation and retheming of the Aladdin into the PH Resort.
Our primary cash requirements for the remainder of 2006 are expected to include (i) up to approximately $81.7 million in capital expenditures related to the renovation project, (ii) approximately $16.5 million for maintenance capital expenditures and (iii) up to approximately $30.6 million in interest payments on our debt.
We believe that cash generated from operations, the capital invested in OpBiz in connection with our acquisition of the Aladdin and available working capital, including the cash that we acquired from Aladdin Gaming under the purchase agreement, will be adequate to meet the anticipated working capital, capital expenditure, renovation and debt service obligations of OpBiz for at least the next 12 months of operations. We may have other liquidity needs, such as tax distributions to the members of EquityCo and BH/RE, and we believe that we will have adequate cash to meet these needs if they should arise. The Credit Agreement allows OpBiz to make tax distributions.
There can be no assurance that we have accurately estimated our liquidity needs, or that we will not experience unforeseen events that may materially increase our need for liquidity to fund our operations or capital expenditure programs or decrease the amount of cash generated from our operations. We expect to experience a reduction in cash generated by our operations during our planned renovations to the Aladdin and have negotiated the terms of the Credit Agreement to address those anticipated reductions. For example, the covenant in the Credit Agreement requiring OpBiz to achieve specified levels of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) during the first two years of the Credit Agreement is significantly below the Aladdin’s current EBITDA levels. Also, the interest rate during the first three years of the term of the Credit Agreement is lower than the interest rate in the last three years.
Description of Certain Indebtedness
Credit Agreement
The Aladdin acquisition and the planned renovations were funded by the issuance of $510 million of secured notes to Aladdin Gaming’s secured creditors pursuant to a Credit Agreement. OpBiz’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by liens on all of its assets, including a mortgage on its real property, the Hotel, the Casino and the TPA, and security interests in our accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and intangible assets, excluding the Timeshare Land. The Credit Agreement is guaranteed by MezzCo and MezzCo secured its guarantee by pledging its membership interests in OpBiz to the lenders. The Credit Agreement matures on August 31, 2010.
The loans under the Credit Agreement are evidenced by $500 million of Term Loan A notes and $10 million of Term Loan B notes. Upon issuance of the notes, BH/RE simultaneously made a $14 million cash payment to the holders of the Term Loan A notes to reduce the principal amount of the Term Loan A notes to $486 million and obtained a release of their lien on the Timeshare Land.
The scheduled principal payments on the Term Loan A notes are as follows:
• $1.25 million on the first day of each fiscal quarter during the period beginning on August 31, 2006 and ending on August 31, 2007;
• $3.75 million on the first day of each fiscal quarter during the period beginning on August 31, 2007 and ending on August 31, 2008;
• $5.0 million on the first day of each fiscal quarter during the period beginning on August 31, 2008 and ending on August 31, 2009;
• $6.25 million on the first day of each fiscal quarter during the period beginning on August 31, 2009 and ending on August 31, 2010;
• the then unpaid balance amount of Term Loan A notes on August 31, 2010.
OpBiz pays interest on the outstanding Term Loan A notes quarterly, in cash, at the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR,
22
plus an applicable margin that increases over time. Until the earlier of August 31, 2007 or OpBiz’s accumulation of certain permitted cash reserves, OpBiz’s interest payment will not exceed its quarterly EBITDA, reduced by certain permitted deductions (as defined in the Credit Agreement), divided by a factor of 1.20. Interest on the Term Loan B notes will accrue at a rate of LIBOR plus 4% and will be added quarterly to the outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan B notes and will be paid when OpBiz pays off the Term Loan B notes. OpBiz is also required to pay an annual administrative fee and certain other fees and expenses of the lender under the Credit Agreement.
OpBiz is required to prepay amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement:
• with excess cash flow (as defined in the Credit Agreement) after certain permitted cash reserves are accumulated;
• in scheduled quarterly amounts beginning after August, 31, 2006;
• with certain amounts received in connection with the development of the Timeshare Land adjacent to the Desert Passage (as defined in the underlying agreement);
• with an amount equal to the difference between what should have been spent on renovation capital expenditures and what was actually spent thereon if (i) an aggregate amount of $72.0 million is not spent on renovation capital expenditures by August 31, 2006, or (ii) an aggregate amount of $81.0 million is not spent on renovation capital expenditures by February 28, 2007 or (iii) an aggregate amount of $90.0 million is not spent on renovation capital expenditures by August 31, 2007; and
• with the proceeds of certain asset sales.
In particular, after OpBiz accumulates certain permitted cash reserves, OpBiz is required to pay 100% of its excess cash flow (as defined in the Credit Agreement) from operations to the lenders under the Credit Agreement. That percentage decreases to 75%, then 50%, if OpBiz meets certain targeted ratios of total debt to EBITDA, or certain leverage ratios, for any two consecutive fiscal quarters.
The Credit Agreement includes covenants that, among other things, restrict OpBiz’s ability to sell assets, make distributions to its owners, other than distributions for taxes, incur or prepay additional indebtedness, enter into transactions with affiliates, incur liens, make investments, make capital expenditures, develop the Timeshare Land adjacent to the Desert Passage and enter into material contracts. In addition, OpBiz is required to maintain certain levels of EBITDA that increase over time and, beginning August 31, 2007, maintain certain ratios of EBITDA to interest expense that increase over time and maintain certain leverage ratios that decrease over time.
The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, including a change of control of OpBiz, the occurrence of a default under the terms of any indebtedness of MezzCo, a default by OpBiz under the Hotel management contract or termination of Sheraton as the manager of the Hotel (unless OpBiz replaces Sheraton with another approved manager within 30 days of such termination), a default or termination of the Planet Hollywood license agreement and certain defaults under the agreements with Boulevard Invest or Northwind Aladdin.
BH/RE has issued warrants to purchase 2.94% of its ownership interest in EquityCo to the lenders under the Credit Agreement. The warrants can only be exercised upon the occurrence of a (i) liquidity event or distribution (such as through the sale of the hotel/casino); (ii) a public sale of equity securities of EquityCo, MezzCo or OpBiz; or (iii) payment in full of the obligations under the Credit Agreement. The warrants can either be settled in cash or in other membership interests upon exercise. The estimated fair value of the warrants was approximately $0.1 million as of March 31, 2006. These warrants are recorded separately from the related debt within other long-term liabilities.
Mezzanine Financing
In August 2004, MezzCo entered into the Mezzanine Financing with a group of purchasers. Pursuant to the Mezzanine Financing, MezzCo issued $87 million of 16% Senior Secured Subordinated Notes and warrants to purchase 17,500 of its units representing membership interests equal to 17.5% of the fully diluted equity of MezzCo. The gross offering proceeds of the Mezzanine Financing were deposited into an escrow account and, in conjunction with the closing of the Aladdin acquisition, were used to (i) pay approximately $16.1 million of fees and expenses related to the acquisition of the Aladdin, (ii) fund the $14 million lien release payment required under the Credit Agreement, and (iii) fund a portion of the planned renovations to the Aladdin. The notes mature in August 2011 and accrue interest at a rate of 16% per annum. Interest on the notes is payable-in-kind or, at the option of MezzCo, in cash.
The warrants are exercisable at any time, subject to the approval of the Nevada gaming authorities, at a purchase price of $0.01 per unit. Subject to the approval of the Nevada gaming authorities, the warrants may be exercised to purchase either voting or non-voting membership interests of MezzCo or a combination thereof. Currently, all of MezzCo’s voting membership interests are represented by units owned by EquityCo. In addition to customary anti-dilution protections, the number of units representing MezzCo membership interests issuable upon exercise of the warrants may be increased from time-to-time upon the occurrence of certain events
23
as described in the warrants. The maximum aggregate increase is 24%, following which the warrants would represent rights to purchase 41.5% of the units representing the fully diluted equity of MezzCo. Holders of the warrants and any securities issued upon exercise of the warrants may require MezzCo to redeem such securities commencing in August 2011 at a redemption price based upon a formula set forth in the warrants. Starting in August 2008, in the event the Company fails to achieve certain operational thresholds, the holders of the MezzCo warrants, and securities issued upon exercise thereof, have the right to assume control of MezzCo and OpBiz and conduct a sale of the equity of, or all or substantially all of the assets of, either MezzCo or OpBiz provided that all Control Conditions (as defined in the Investor Rights Agreement) are met. These rights are subject to (i) repayment in full of all indebtedness that is senior to the notes (including all indebtedness of OpBiz under the Credit Agreement), (ii) certain covenants related to OpBiz’s ability to achieve targeted levels of EBITDA and (iii) the prior approval of the Nevada gaming authorities. These rights expire upon completion of a public offering by MezzCo or OpBiz. In connection with the Mezzanine Financing, our obligation to make expenditures on renovations to the Aladdin was increased from $90 million, as required under the Credit Agreement, to $100 million.
As of March 31, 2006, the MezzCo financing was recorded net of the unamortized balance of the warrants of approximately $3.8 million. The estimated fair value of the warrants was approximately $4.1 million at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and is recorded separately from the related debt within other long-term liabilities.
Energy Services Agreement
Northwind owns and operates a central utility plant on land leased from us. The plant supplies hot and cold water and emergency power to the Aladdin under a contract between Aladdin Gaming and Northwind. We have assumed the energy service agreement, which expires in 2020. Under the agreement, we are required to pay Northwind a monthly consumption charge, a monthly operational charge, a monthly debt service payment and a monthly return on equity payment. Payments under the Northwind agreement total approximately $0.5 million per month.
Forward Looking Statements
When used in this report and elsewhere by management from time-to-time, the words “believes”, “anticipates” and “expects” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements with respect to our financial condition, results of operations and our business including our expansion, legal proceedings and employee matters. Certain important factors, including but not limited to, competition from other gaming operations, factors affecting our ability to complete acquisitions and dispositions of gaming properties, leverage, construction risks, the inherent uncertainty and costs associated with litigation and governmental and regulatory investigations, and licensing and other regulatory risks, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. Further information on potential factors which could affect our financial condition, results of operations and business including, without limitation, the expansion, development and acquisition projects, legal proceedings and employee matters are included in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Please refer to the discussion of Risk Factors in Item 1A of BH/RE’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2006. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date thereof. We undertake no obligation to update information contained in forward-looking statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our long-term debt. We pay interest on the outstanding Term Loan A notes quarterly, in cash, at the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin that increases over time. Interest on the Term Loan B notes will accrue at a rate of LIBOR plus 4% and will be added quarterly to the outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan B notes and will be paid when we pay off the Term Loan B notes. An increase of one percentage point in the average interest rate applicable to the variable rate debt outstanding at March 31, 2006, would increase our annual interest expense for the remainder of 2006 by approximately $3.8 million.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of March 31, 2006. Based on their evaluation, our principal executive and principal financial officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2006.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15-d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during our fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
24
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
31.1 | | Certification pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Michael V. Mecca. |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Donna Lehmann. |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Michael V. Mecca. |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Donna Lehmann. |
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| BH/RE, L.L.C. |
| |
| |
May 15, 2006 | By: | /S/ Donna Lehmann | |
| Donna Lehmann |
| Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
26
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | | Description |
31.1 | | Certification pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Michael V. Mecca. |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Donna Lehmann. |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Michael V. Mecca. |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Donna Lehmann. |
27