Nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2005.
The following table summarizes the combined results of the Predecessor for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and the consolidated results of the Successor for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
Brake product sales decreased $54 million, or 8.6% due mainly to a $47 million decrease in sales volume as a result of weaker retail markets in the first half of 2005. Sales to AutoZone accounted for $17 million in 2004 and therefore resulted in 31% of the decline.
Filtration product sales increased $34 million, or 7.3%, due primarily to strong sales growth in the United States, Canada, and Brazil, along with pricing and foreign currency translation gains.
Chassis product sales were down $4 million due to the discontinuance of our relationship with AutoZone, which accounted for $15 million of sales during the same nine months of 2004. Without the effect of the loss of AutoZone, chassis sales grew by $11 million or 6.2% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2004.
Our distribution and other operations sales increased an aggregate of $26 million, or 7.8%. This increase was due primarily to foreign currency translation gains, along with strong sales growth.
Cost of sales. Our cost of sales increased $25 million or 1.8% to $1,383 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to $1,358 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The gross margin was 15% and 16% for the nine month periods ending September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in cost of sales is primarily due to foreign currency translation adjustments, along with a lower absorption of manufacturing costs as a result of our facility closures and restructuring programs and our aggressive inventory reduction program.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Our selling, general and administrative expenses increased $7 million, or 3.8%, to $190 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 from $183 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 12% and 11% for the nine month periods ending September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. This increase was due to a one time $4 million reduction in worker's compensation expense in the third quarter of 2004 and customer changeovers associated with the procurement of new business in the brake and chassis product lines.
Operating profit. Our operating profit decreased to $24 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 from $75 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The decrease in operating profit was due to $21 million loss on the disposition of Beck Arnley, lower absorption of manufacturing costs as a result of our facility closures due to our restructuring program, higher administrative costs, and customer change over costs associated with the procurement of new business.
Interest expense. Interest expense was $40 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to $2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The increase was due to interest and finance charges from the financing, including the Notes and the senior credit facilities, obtained during the fourth quarter of 2004 to fund the Acquisition.
Income tax provision. Our provision for income taxes decreased by $36 million to a $4 million benefit for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to a provision of $32 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 due primarily to the reduction in pre-tax income. Due to our net loss in the first nine months of 2005, the Company had a tax benefit rate of 36.4% compared to an effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 of 41.6%. The effective tax rate for September 30, 2005 and 2004 was higher than the 35% effective U.S. federal statutory tax rate due principally to higher effective non-U.S. tax rates and, to a lesser extent, inclusion of state and local taxes net of the state and federal tax benefit.
Net income (loss). Net income decreased $53 million, to a net loss of $7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, as a result of the foregoing.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company's primary source of liquidity is cash flow from operations. We also have availability under our revolving credit facility and receivables facility, subject to certain requirements. Our primary liquidity requirements are expected to be for debt servicing, working capital, restructuring obligations and capital spending. Our liquidity requirements are significant, primarily due to debt service requirements and expected capital expenditures.
We are significantly leveraged as a result of the Acquisition. Affinia issued senior subordinated notes, entered into senior credit facilities, consisting of a revolving credit facility and term loan facilities, and initiated a trade accounts receivable securitization program (the "Receivables Facility"). As of September 30, 2005, we had $633 million in aggregate indebtedness, with an additional $117 million of borrowing capacity available under our revolving credit facility, after giving effect to $8 million in outstanding letters of credit, which reduced the amount available thereunder. The aggregate indebtedness decreased $74 million since December 31, 2004, consisting of a $29 million reduction in debt and a $45 million reduction in our Receivables Facility, which qualified for off balance sheet financing as of December 31, 2004. We had nothing outstanding under our Receivables Facility as of September 30, 2005 and $55 million outstanding as of December 31, 2004 of which $45 million qualified for off balance sheet financing. The Receivables Facility provides for a maximum capacity of $100 million. Pursuant to a registration rights agreement, additional interest on the Notes began to
24
accrue as of August 27, 2005 at a rate of 0.25% per annum. On November 2, 2005, additional interest ceased to accrue as we completed the exchange offer pursuant to which the Notes were exchanged for freely tradable notes registered under the Securities Act.
We spent $23 million on capital expenditures during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the Company expects capital expenditures to total between $30 and $32 million during 2005, primarily in connection with capital improvements intended to rationalize our manufacturing programs throughout the Company.
Based on the current level of operations, the Company believes that cash flow from operations and available cash, together with available borrowings under its revolving credit facility, will be adequate to meet liquidity needs and fund planned capital expenditures. The Company may, however, need to refinance all or a portion of the principal amount of the Notes and/or senior credit facility borrowings, on or prior to maturity, to meet liquidity needs. If it is determined that refinancing is necessary, and the Company is unable to secure such financing on acceptable terms, then the Company may have insufficient liquidity to carry on its operations and meet its obligations at such time.
The Company can give no assurance that its business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, which any revenue growth or operating improvements will be realized, or that future borrowings will be available under its revolving credit facilities in an amount sufficient to enable it to service its indebtedness or to fund other liquidity needs. In addition, the Company can give no assurance that it will be able to refinance any of its indebtedness, including its senior credit facilities and the Notes, on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Adjusted EBITDA is used to determine our compliance with many of the covenants contained in our senior credit facilities and in the indenture governing the Notes. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA further adjusted to exclude unusual items and other adjustments permitted in calculating covenant compliance under the indenture and our senior credit facility.
The breach of covenants in our senior credit facilities that are tied to ratios based on Adjusted EBITDA could result in a default under those facilities and the lenders could elect to declare all amounts borrowed due and payable. Any such acceleration would also result in a default under our indenture. Additionally, under our debt facilities, our ability to engage in activities such as incurring additional indebtedness, making investments and paying dividends is also tied to ratios based on Adjusted EBITDA. However, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not recognized terms under GAAP and do not purport to be alternatives to net income as a measure of operating performance. Additionally, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not intended to be measures of free cash flow for management's discretionary use, as they do not consider certain cash requirements such as interest payments, tax payments and debt service requirements.
We believe that the inclusion of supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in presenting Adjusted EBITDA is appropriate to provide additional information to investors to demonstrate compliance with our financing covenants.
25
The following table reconciles net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA (Dollars in Millions):

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Predecessor Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 |  | Successor Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 |  | Predecessor Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 |  | Successor Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 |
|  | (unaudited) |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 16 | |  | $ | 8 | |  | $ | 46 | |  | $ | (7 | ) |
Interest expense |  | | 1 | |  | | 13 | |  | | 2 | |  | | 40 | |
Depreciation and amortization |  | | 11 | |  | | 10 | |  | | 33 | |  | | 33 | |
Income tax |  | | 11 | |  | | 6 | |  | | 32 | |  | | (4 | ) |
EBITDA |  | | 39 | |  | | 37 | |  | | 113 | |  | | 62 | |
Restructuring charges(a) |  | | — | |  | | 2 | |  | | — | |  | | 12 | |
Minority interest(b) |  | | (1 | ) |  | | — | |  | | — | |  | | — | |
Beck Arnley(c) |  | | 2 | |  | | — | |  | | 7 | |  | | 21 | |
Other adjustments(d) |  | | 13 | |  | | — | |  | | 13 | |  | | — | |
Adjusted EBITDA |  | $ | 53 | |  | $ | 39 | |  | $ | 133 | |  | $ | 95 | |
 |
 |  |
(a) | Certain costs such as restructuring, change-over costs and certain other non-recurring charges are allowed to be added back to EBITDA. |
 |  |
(b) | We incurred charges for the minority interest for a number of non-wholly owned subsidiaries, most significantly our Polish subsidiary. EBITDA is adjusted to eliminate the minority interest charge. |
 |  |
(c) | Adjustments for negative EBITDA of Beck Arnley. |
 |  |
(d) | Reflects one time Dana adjustments to the Predecessor financial statements as a result of the sale. |
Our covenant levels and ratios for the four quarters ended September 30, 2005 are as follows:

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Covenant Compliance Level at September 30, 2005 |  | Ratios |
Senior Credit Facilities |  | | | |  | |
Minimum Adjusted EBITDA to cash interest ratio |  | | 2.00x | |  | 2.54x |
Maximum net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio |  | | 5.00x | |  | 4.82x |
Indenture |  | | | |  | |
Minimum Adjusted EBITDA to Consolidated Interest Expense required to incur additional debt pursuant to ratio provisions |  | | 2.00x | |  | 2.54x |
 |
Net cash provided by or used in operating activities
Net cash provided by or used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2005 was a $13 million use of cash and a $90 million source of cash, respectively. The $90 million source of cash from operating activities for the first nine months of 2005 was principally due to a $62 million reduction in inventories and $29 million increase in payables offset by a use of cash in accounts receivables of $11 million.
The increase in accounts receivables and accounts payables was due principally to the timing of cash collections due to the seasonal nature of the industry in which the Company operates. The Company is in the process of implementing a program designed to increase our efficiency in our manufacturing process. As a result of this lean manufacturing program, we are beginning to see the benefits of reduced inventories.
26
Net cash used in investing activities
Historically, net cash used in investing activities has been for capital expenditures, offset by proceeds from the disposition of property, plant and equipment. Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2005 were $31 million and $23 million, respectively. In addition, the Company settled its working capital adjustments with Dana as part of the Acquisition, resulting in an additional $28 million payment to Dana during the second quarter of 2005.
Net cash provided by or used in financing activities
Net cash provided by or used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2005 was a $46 million source of cash and a $74 million use of cash, respectively. The $74 million use of cash was a result of payments on the current and long term debt. Cash was generated for paying down debt by focusing on reducing inventories and the sale of Beck Arnley and Cumsa. Conversely, the prior year includes a $69 million source of cash due to net transactions with the related parties of the Predecessor in connection with the Acquisition.
Impact of the Acquisition and Related Financing Transactions
As a result of the Acquisition, our assets and liabilities were adjusted to their preliminary estimated fair value as of November 30, 2004, the closing date of the Acquisition. Purchase price allocations are subject to adjustment until all pertinent information regarding the Acquisition is obtained and fully evaluated. During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company expects to complete the purchase price allocation related to the Acquisition. As discussed above, we incurred significant indebtedness in connection with the Acquisition. Accordingly, our interest expense is higher than it was prior to the Acquisition. The excess of the total purchase price over the value of our net assets at November 30, 2004, the date of the closing of the Acquisition, was allocated to other intangible assets. These long-lived assets are subject to annual impairment review.
Risk Factors. As a result of the Acquisition we are highly leveraged. This leverage may limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, product development, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes, limit our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to any of our less leveraged competitors. In addition, a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations must be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness and is not available for other purposes, including our operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities. Certain of our borrowings, including borrowings under our senior credit facilities, are at variable rates of interest, exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates. We may be more vulnerable than a less leveraged company to a downturn in general economic conditions or in our business, or we may be unable to carry out capital spending that is important to our growth.
Seller Note. As part of the financing in connection with the Acquisition, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. issued a subordinated pay-in-kind note due 2019 with a face amount of $75 million (collectively, the "Seller Note") to an affiliate of Dana. The Seller Note had an estimated fair value of $50 million upon issuance at November 30, 2004. Affina and the guarantors of its Notes have no obligations with respect to the Seller Note.
27
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to various market risks, which are potential losses arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as currency and interest rate fluctuation. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes
Currency risk
Outside of the United States, we maintain assets and operations in Canada, Europe, Mexico, South America and Asia. The results of operations and financial position of our foreign operations are principally measured in their respective currency and translated into U.S. dollars. As a result, exposure to foreign currency gains and losses exists. The reported income of these subsidiaries will be higher or lower depending on an appreciation or depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the respective foreign currency. Our subsidiaries and affiliates also purchase and sell products and services in various currencies. As a result, we may be exposed to cost increases relative to the local currencies in the markets in which we sell. Because a different percentage of our revenues is in foreign currency than our costs, a change in the relative value of the U.S. dollar could have a disproportionate impact on our revenues as compared to our costs.
A portion of our assets are based in our foreign locations and are translated into U.S. dollars at foreign currency exchange rates in effect as of the end of each period, with the effect of such translation reflected in other comprehensive income (loss). Accordingly, our shareholders' equity will fluctuate depending upon the appreciation or depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the respective foreign currency. Similarly, the revenues and expenses of our foreign operations are transacted at average rates during the period such that exchange rate movements can have a significant impact on our sales trend, and to a lesser extent on our profits.
Our strategy for management of currency risk relies primarily on conducting our operations in a country's respective currency and may, from time to time, involve currency derivatives.
Interest rate risk
As of September 30, 2005, we had $332 million of variable rate debt outstanding. A 1% increase in the average interest rate would increase future interest expense by approximately $3 million per year. We are required by our senior credit facilities, for a period of not less than two years from November 30, 2004, to maintain in effect appropriate interest protection and other hedging arrangements so that at least 40% of our aggregate obligations under the term loan facility, our Notes and any additional senior subordinated notes we might issue will bear interest at a fixed rate. At September 30, 2005, the percentage of fixed rate to total debt of our aggregate obligations under the term loan facility and Notes was approximately 47%.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Earlier in the year management identified a material weakness in the operation of our internal controls and procedures related specifically to the Company's failure to properly reconcile $2 million, net of tax, of intercompany account balances relating to the March 31, 2005 Beck Arnley disposition prior to the preparation of the Company's quarterly financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
To address this control deficiency, the Company adopted a detailed work plan to ensure that inter-company balances are reconciled and adjusted on a timely basis. The Company has implemented the detailed work plan and has properly reconciled and adjusted intercompany account balances for subsequent months. The Company has completed the process to verify the adequacy of the measures taken and ensure that these measures have completely addressed the previously identified concern. We believe that our remediation efforts have been successful and accordingly that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of September 30, 2005.
28
The Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer each concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2005 because management believes its remediation efforts have been successful.
29
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits
 |  |
(a) | Exhibits |
(31) Certifications of Executive Officers pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
(32) Certifications of Executive Officers pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(b)
30
SIGNATURES
The issuer has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | AFFINIA GROUP INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS INC. |
|  | |  | |
|  | By: |  | /s/ Terry R. McCormack |
|  | |  | Terry R. McCormack Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
|  | |  | |
|  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas H. Madden |
|  | |  | Thomas H. Madden Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|  | |  | |
|  | By: |  | /s/ Patrick W. Flanagan |
|  | |  | Patrick W. Flanagan Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
 |
Date: November 14, 2005
31