UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-21825
AARP FUNDS
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
601 E. Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)
| | |
(Name and Address of Agent for Service) | | Copy to: |
| |
Larry C. Renfro AARP Funds 650 F Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 | | Jane A. Kanter, Esq. Dechert LLP 1775 I Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006-2401 |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (202) 434-3546
Date of fiscal year end: June 30
Date of reporting period: June 30, 2006
Item 1: Report to Shareholders.
AARP FUNDS
. . .
Annual Report
June 30, 2006
A new vision for the American investor
. . .
AARP Conservative Fund
AARP Moderate Fund
AARP Aggressive Fund
. . .
KEEPING YOU INFORMED
This first annual report for the AARP Funds represents our commitment to providing communications that are clear, concise and informative. One of our highest priorities at AARP Funds is to help you make sense of investment information that is often complex. We hope you find it helpful in evaluating your investment with us.
EXPERTISE AND GUIDANCE WHEN YOU NEED IT
AARP Financial’s investment counselors are ready to help you determine if you are on track financially for retirement and to answer specific questions about AARP Funds. They work on salary, not commission, and are there to help you focus on your goals, take decisive action and feel comfortable with your decisions. Investment counselors are NASD registered representatives through ALPS Distributors, Inc., and are employed by AARP Financial.
Table of Contents
While AARP has licensed the use of its name to AARP Funds and endorses the services provided by AARP Financial Incorporated, AARP cannot recommend that you or any specific individual should purchase shares of a particular fund. AARP is not a registered investment adviser or broker/dealer. Investment counselors are NASD registered representatives through ALPS Distributors, Inc., a registered broker/dealer, and are employed by AARP Financial, a registered investment adviser.
This Annual Report must be preceded or accompanied by the applicable AARP Fund’s prospectus for individuals who are not current AARP Funds shareholders. An investor should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of AARP Funds carefully before investing. To get a prospectus containing this and other information, please call (800) 958-6457. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest.
AARP Funds are distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc.
AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 1
A LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS
Larry C. Renfro
President
AARP Funds
Fellow Shareholder,
In our first annual report, I want to share with you the story of AARP Funds, and why they were created.
It’s actually a story about you. It begins with a simple observation: Many of us aren’t saving enough for retirement. And when we do manage to save, often times we’re not making smart investment choices.
Over the past several years, AARP has gone to great lengths to figure out how investors got into this situation, and what AARP should do to help.
The first thing was to talk with well-known experts. The process included poring over industry and academic studies, looking at key statistics, and talking directly with AARP members.
The findings were telling — many financial products often fall far short of meeting investors’ needs. Many carry large minimum initial investment requirements and impose high fees that eat away returns. Others capitalize on investment fads and clutter the market with a confusing array of choices. And so many products demand too much time and effort, and financial expertise beyond the reach of many investors.
Investing has gotten far more difficult than it needs to be for many of us. And when anything gets difficult, people often stumble and make mistakes that can reduce their returns.
AARP’s conclusion: Americans need a better, more affordable way to invest. And AARP would have to make it happen.
As a nonprofit, nonpartisan membership organization for people age 50 and over, AARP felt uniquely positioned to help Americans achieve retirement readiness.
And so AARP Financial was born. Five fundamental principles drive its investment philosophy: low cost, simple choices, indexing, diversification, and rebalancing. AARP Financial believes these are core investment principles that should stand as the foundation of any prudent retirement investing program, and are the foundation of AARP Funds.
2 A Letter to Shareholders
Low fees
Research indicates that many investors overlook costs when choosing a mutual fund — despite the fact that fees can have a tremendous impact on reducing returns. For example, consider the average U.S. stock fund, which charges 1.13% of an investor’s account balance every year.1 If you invested $100,000 in such a fund and earned 5% a year, those fees would cost you a stunning $53,944 after 20 years. Pick a fund that charges just 0.50% instead, and you would have an extra $28,634 for your retirement, all other things being equal.2
AARP Financial’s solution? Build a low-cost strategy into a new fund family, so that investors could enjoy these potential savings.
Simple choices
American consumers often think the more choices, the better. But that isn’t necessarily true — at least, not when it comes to investing. How can anyone possibly pick from thousands of U.S. mutual funds? Research suggests that too much choice may confuse investors, rather than help them.3 For example, research indicates that the more funds a 401(k) plan offers, the fewer employees participate.4 Faced with a daunting array of options, many investors seem to give up, feel paralyzed or simply take a guess.
AARP Financial concluded that a simpler approach was in order. That’s why the AARP Conservative, Moderate and Aggressive Funds combine both stocks and bonds to provide a complete, diversified portfolio in one purchase.
1 | Investment Company Institute, Research Fundamentals, Fees and Expenses of Mutual Funds, 2005, Vol. 15/No. 4, June 2006. |
2 | These calculations came from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s online tool for comparing the costs of owning mutual funds, The SEC Mutual Fund Cost Calculator. You can find the tool by going to the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov. (Please keep in mind that AARP Funds do not operate, maintain, or have any connections to The SEC Mutual Fund Cost Calculator.) |
3 | Benartzi, Shlomo, and Richard H. Thaler, How Much Is Investor Autonomy Worth?, 2001; Iyengar, Sheena S., Wei Jiang, Gur Huberman, How Much Choice Is Too Much?: Determinants of Individual Contributions in 401(k) Retirement Plans, Draft, March 2003; Thaler, Richard H., and Shlomo Benartzi, Save More Tomorrow: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving, Journal of Political Economy, 2004. |
A Letter to Shareholders 3
Indexing
When you think of a mutual fund, you may picture portfolio managers who spend long hours looking at company research and actively trading stocks and bonds. That style of fund management is very popular. The problem is, it may not always work very well. Studies over the years indicate that active managers have rarely beaten the returns of major market indexes over long periods of time.5
That’s why the AARP Funds use index investing. Index investments are designed to reflect a broader market — such as the stock or bond market — rather than trying to outguess the market and pick individual winners and losers. Index funds may achieve a performance advantage by maintaining low management fees and low turnover (the buying and selling of securities by the fund). Please note that past performance doesn’t guarantee future results.
Diversification
By now, most investors have heard the mantra of diversification: Avoid putting all your eggs in one basket, and spread your investments across different kinds of assets, such as stocks and bonds. None of us can tell which investments will rise in price, but if your investments are diversified enough, you may own investments that rise in value. Just as important, if you are adequately diversified, the impact of investments that lose value will be lessened. Please keep in mind that diversification doesn’t eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses.
From the start, the AARP Conservative, Moderate and Aggressive Funds were designed to provide diversification by investing in a mix of stocks and bonds that seek to track the returns of major market indexes.
Automatic rebalancing
Prudent portfolio management suggests that investors should regularly monitor their investments, and adjust them as needed. That’s because, over time, some investments may rise and others fall, leaving more or less risk than originally intended. To stay on track, investors may need to periodically sell off investments that have risen in value, and buy more of others that have fallen — a process called “rebalancing.” Selling an investment for rebalancing purposes may be subject to taxes.
Many investors may have trouble rebalancing on their own. If so many of us find it difficult to make a single investment decision, how many will commit to making such decisions every month or every year? That is why every AARP Fund is automatically rebalanced by professionals, so that investors don’t have to do it themselves.
5 | Malkiel, Burton G., The Random Walk Guide to Investing, 2003. |
4 A Letter to Shareholders
How it all fits together, especially in today’s markets
The beauty of these five principles is the way they all work together. Whatever the short-term economic and market environment, the AARP Funds are designed for the mid- to long-term investor. By offering a complete, diversified investment program that is closely monitored, our goal is to help you stay on track, as you prepare for and enjoy retirement.
This approach to investing is designed to help investors weather stormy markets. Given the level of uncertainty in the market today, the urge to try to “time the market” — that is, the urge to avoid a market drop or catch an upswing — is a natural one. But market movements are virtually impossible to predict, even if you’re an expert investor. And the penalties for guessing wrong can be very costly. History suggests that market bumps tend to smooth out over time. Staying invested in a well-diversified investment like an AARP Fund may help you keep on course through the inevitable ups and downs in the market.
I am pleased that so many AARP Fund investors like you seem to agree with our no-nonsense approach. We appreciate the trust you have placed in us by investing in our funds, and pledge to continue striving to live up to our mission — giving you an easier, more cost-effective way to invest for retirement. If at any time you should have any questions, please feel free to contact us at (800) 958-6457.
Sincerely,
Larry C. Renfro
President
An investor should consider the investment objective, risks, charges and expenses of AARP Funds carefully before investing. To get a Prospectus containing this and other information, call (800) 958-6457. Read the Prospectus carefully before you invest.
AARP Funds are distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc.
A Letter to Shareholders 5
Market Commentary
After a strong first quarter, which saw stocks rise across the board, volatility returned to the markets in the second quarter of 2006 with increasing uncertainty about inflation and interest rates. During the first quarter, economic growth was strong and many investors believed the Federal Reserve would end its cycle of interest rate hikes, limiting inflation without stalling economic growth. U.S. stocks, as measured by the MSCI U.S. Investable Market 2500 index, returned 5.3% in the quarter ended March 31, 2006, while international stocks, as measured by the MSCI EAFE index, posted a 9.4% gain for the same period. Bonds did not fare as well; the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index recorded a small first-quarter loss of -0.65%.
During the second quarter ended June 30, 2006, the economy continued to grow, but so did inflation and, with it, investor concerns. The inflection point occurred in mid-May when the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank raised the Fed Funds target rate to 5% and stated that additional increases may be necessary to address inflationary concerns. Higher interest rates, higher energy costs and higher housing prices all contributed to concerns that consumer spending and sentiment in the U.S. would be adversely affected, with corresponding implications for economic growth. Indeed, economic growth did begin to slow in the second quarter. Market volatility often accompanies such turning points and this instance proved to be no different. During the second quarter, the Dow Jones Industrial Average experienced numerous days with 100+ point changes. For the second quarter, U.S. stocks recorded a loss of
-1.88%; U.S. bonds posted a marginal loss of -0.08%; and only international stocks managed to eke out a small gain of 0.70% for the quarter.
Nevertheless, for the six months, both U.S. and international stocks remained in positive territory, which is a good example of why it’s important to focus on long-term performance, rather than short term ups and downs. Maintaining a well-diversified mix of stocks and bonds with a long-term perspective is one of the best ways to weather short-term market trends, including the increase in volatility that began in the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
Notification of Change in Portfolio Manager
On July 5, 2006, AARP Financial announced the appointment of Richard M. Hisey as its Chief Investment Officer responsible for investment strategy, portfolio management and performance analysis of the AARP Funds.
Prior to joining AARP Financial, Mr. Hisey served as Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of Cole Management Incorporated. He also spent 15 years at Lexington Global Asset Managers, Inc. (now ING/Reliastar), where he served as the portfolio manager and investment strategist for a Russian equity mutual fund.
6 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT Market Commentary
AARP Funds Overview
The AARP Funds are “funds of funds” because they invest substantially all of their assets in the underlying “Portfolios” of AARP Portfolios, a separately registered investment company. Each AARP Fund invests in all three of the Portfolios, but in different amounts.
| | | | | | | | | |
| | AARP Conservative Fund | | | AARP Moderate Fund | | | AARP Aggressive Fund | |
Investment Objective | | Seeks primarily current income, with some growth of capital | | | Seeks a balance of growth of capital and current income | | | Seeks growth of capital and some current income | |
Investment Allocation | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Bond Market Portfolio | | 75 | % | | 50 | % | | 25 | % |
U.S. Stock Market Portfolio | | 20 | % | | 40 | % | | 60 | % |
International Stock Market Portfolio | | 5 | % | | 10 | % | | 15 | % |
How the Funds Performed
Period ended June 30, 2006 (since commencement of operations on January 1, 2006)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AARP Conservative Fund | | 0.24 | % | | AARP Moderate Fund | | 1.44 | % | | AARP Aggressive Fund | | 2.60 | % |
Conservative Composite Index | | 0.63 | % | | Moderate Composite Index | | 1.98 | % | | Aggressive Composite Index | | 3.32 | % |
Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index® | | –0.72 | % | | MSCI U.S. Investable Market 2500 Index® | | 3.29 | % | | MSCI U.S. Investable Market 2500 Index® | | 3.29 | % |
| | | | | Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index® | | –0.72 | % | | | | | |
Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit www.aarpfunds.com or call (800) 958-6457. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured.
A Word about Benchmarks
A useful tool to measure the performance of AARP Funds
When evaluating how your investment performed, it’s helpful to compare it to an appropriate benchmark. You can think of the benchmark as a handy yardstick for measuring how well the fund did in meeting its investment objectives. In our case, because the AARP Funds are indexed and trying to produce the returns of a mixture of three indexes,
AARP Funds Overview 7
A Word about Benchmarks (continued)
Indexes vs. index funds
Indexes, as opposed to index funds, are a group or list of securities representing a market or part of a market. The returns of the index do not reflect the costs of actually investing in the index and do not include fees, brokerage commissions or other expenses of investing. While you can invest in an index fund - it’s a real investment, you cannot invest directly in an index - it’s just a list.
we believe that the most useful benchmark is one that combines the three indexes in similar amounts to the AARP Funds. When you combine different indexes into one benchmark, it’s called a “composite index.”
We also believe it is useful for you to consider the returns of the overall bond and stock markets when you assess the performance of the AARP Funds. This allows you to see how diversification works in practice. Sometimes the bond and stock markets move in opposite directions, or when the stock market goes down, the bond market doesn’t go quite as far down.
There is one caveat though. Please remember that a benchmark of indexes has a built-in performance advantage over an actual mutual fund. An index is merely a list of securities in a stock or bond market so the returns of indexes do not reflect the real world costs of managing a mutual fund. It is difficult to match the returns of an index because of this difference.
Following is a table that shows the make up of the composite indexes for each AARP Fund:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | AARP Conservative Fund Conservative Composite Index | | | AARP Moderate Fund Moderate Composite Index | | | AARP Aggressive Fund Aggressive Composite Index | |
Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index | | 75 | % | | 50 | % | | 25 | % |
MSCI U.S. Investable Market 2500® Index | | 20 | % | | 40 | % | | 60 | % |
MSCI EAFE® Index | | 5 | % | | 10 | % | | 15 | % |
A description of each index
• | | Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index — The index includes a large variety of U.S. bonds that are investment grade and taxable, covering three major types of bonds: government and corporate bonds, mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities. |
• | | MSCI U.S. Investable Market 2500 Index* — The index includes about 2,500 securities listed on the New York and American Stock Exchanges and the Nasdaq over-the-counter market. The stocks represent companies of all types and sizes. |
• | | MSCI EAFE Index* — The index includes about 1,000 securities that are listed on the stock exchanges of 21 developed countries, excluding the United States and Canada. |
* | Please note that although the AARP Funds seek to track these MSCI indexes, MSCI does not sponsor, endorse, or promote the AARP Funds. For a more detailed description of our relationship with MSCI please see the prospectus and statement of additional information for the AARP Funds. |
8 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT Benchmark
AARP Conservative Fund Overview
Portfolio of investments
June��30, 2006
Mutual funds: 100.2%
| | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Value | |
U.S. Bond Market Portfolio1 | | 509,527 | | $ | 4,942,414 | |
U.S. Stock Market Portfolio1 | | 130,866 | | | 1,319,133 | |
International Stock Market Portfolio1 | | 31,248 | | | 329,039 | |
| | | | | | |
Total investments: 100.2% (Identified cost $6,696,059) | | | | | 6,590,586 | |
| | | | | | |
Other assets and liabilities, net: (0.2)% | | | | | (10,050 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Total net assets: 100.0% | | | | $ | 6,580,536 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Growth of $10,000 as of June 30, 2006
Cumulative total return for the six months ended June 30, 2006
|
This graph illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the AARP Conservative Fund from January 1, 2006 (commencement of operations) through June 30, 2006, compared to the Conservative Composite Index* and the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index.* |
This hypothetical example does not represent the returns of any particular investment.
Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit www.aarpfunds.com or call (800) 958-6457. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured.
* | The fund’s performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The Conservative Composite Index and the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index have been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the indexes. For more information on the Conservative Composite Index and the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index, please see “A Word about Benchmarks” on page 7. |
AARP Conservative Fund Overview AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 9
AARP Conservative Fund
Portfolio construction
Performance commentary
The Conservative Fund seeks primarily current income, with some growth of capital. Its portfolio targets an asset allocation of 20% U.S. stocks, 5% international stocks and 75% bonds.
For the six months ending June 30, 2006, the AARP Conservative Fund returned 0.24%, as compared to the Conservative Composite Index of 0.63% and as compared to the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index, which recorded a loss of -0.72% for the six months. The Fund tracked its composite benchmark index closely, after a brief startup period. Of course, an index fund very rarely matches the performance of its benchmark index exactly, since a fund has operating expenses and an index does not.
While the bond markets declined during this period, the Fund delivered a small positive return, thanks to a diversified portfolio balanced with U.S. and international stocks. Given its large weighting in bonds, the key factor in the fund’s performance during the first six months was the dynamic interest rate environment in the U.S. During this time, the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank continued its policy of raising short term interest rates to address inflationary concerns in the U.S. As interest rates rise, the value of existing bonds tend to decline and for the first six months of 2006, U.S. bonds (as measured by the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index) declined by -0.72%. Compared to its composite index, the primary detractors from performance were: 1) fund expenses — indexes do not have expenses; and, 2) tracking differences (the difference between the performance of the Fund and its comparative index) as the Fund began operations. Compared to the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index, the key contributors to the Fund’s performance were its investments in the U.S. Stock Market Portfolio (which recorded a total return of 1.52% for the period) and the International Stock Market Portfolio (which recorded a total return of 7.10% for the period).
10 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT AARP Conservative Fund
AARP Moderate Fund Overview
Portfolio of investments
June 30, 2006
Mutual funds: 100.0%
| | | | | |
| | Shares | | Value |
U.S. Bond Market Portfolio1 | | 676,693 | | $ | 6,563,921 |
U.S. Stock Market Portfolio1 | | 520,907 | | | 5,250,747 |
International Stock Market Portfolio1 | | 124,614 | | | 1,312,186 |
| | | | | |
Total investments: 100.0% (Identified cost $13,338,038) | | | | | 13,126,854 |
| | | | | |
Other assets and liabilities, net: 0.0% | | | | | 5,799 |
| | | | | |
Total net assets: 100.0% | | | | $ | 13,132,653 |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Growth of $10,000 as of June 30, 2006
Cumulative total return for the six months ended June 30, 2006
|
This graph illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the AARP Moderate Fund from January 1, 2006 (commencement of operations) through June 30, 2006, compared to the Moderate Composite Index, the MSCI U.S. Investable Market 2500 Index*, and the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index.* |
This hypothetical example does not represent the returns of any particular investment.
Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit www.aarpfunds.com or or call (800) 958-6457. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured.
* | The fund’s performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The Moderate Composite Index, the MSCI U.S. Investable Market 2500 Index and the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index have been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the indexes. For more information on the Moderate Composite Index, the MSCI U.S. Investable Market 2500 Index and the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index, please see “A Word about Benchmarks” on page 7. |
AARP Moderate Fund Overview AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 11
AARP Moderate Fund
Portfolio construction
Tracking difference
The difference between the performance of the Fund and its comparative index.
Performance commentary
The AARP Moderate Fund seeks a balance of growth of capital and current income. To pursue this objective, the fund targets an investment of 40% of its portfolio in U.S. stocks, 10% in international stocks and 50% in bonds.
For the six months ending June 30, 2006, the AARP Moderate Fund returned 1.44%, as compared to the Moderate Composite Index of 1.98%, -0.72% for the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index and 3.29% for the MSCI U.S. Investable 2500 Index. The Fund tracked its composite benchmark index closely, after a brief startup period. Of course, an index fund very rarely matches the performance of its benchmark index exactly, since a fund has operating expenses and an index does not.
For the six months, the key factors in the Fund’s performance were the returns generated by the U.S. Bond Market Portfolio and the U.S. Stock Market Portfolio, given their weightings in the Fund. The dynamic interest rate environment in the U.S. was a key detractor for the six months. During this time, the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank continued its policy of raising short-term interest rates to address inflationary concerns in the U.S. As interest rates rise, the value of existing bonds tend to decline and for the first six months of 2006, U.S. bonds (as measured by the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index) declined by -0.72%, negatively impacting the Fund’s performance. The Fund’s position in U.S. stocks was a net contributor to performance during the period. Within the U.S. stock market (as measured by the MSCI U.S. Investable Market 2500 Index), the energy, financial and industrials sectors all contributed to performance. Conversely, the information technology (-6%) and healthcare sectors (-4%) were down for the period. Against the indexes, the Fund’s performance was negatively impacted by Fund expenses (the indexes do not have expenses) and tracking differences as the Fund began operations.
12 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT AARP Moderate Fund
AARP Aggressive Fund Overview
Portfolio of investments
June 30, 2006
Mutual funds: 99.9%
| | | | | |
| | Shares | | Value |
U.S. Bond Market Portfolio1 | | 166,686 | | $ | 1,616,858 |
U.S. Stock Market Portfolio1 | | 383,551 | | | 3,866,199 |
International Stock Market Portfolio1 | | 91,625 | | | 964,812 |
| | | | | |
Total investments: 99.9% (Identified cost $6,536,538) | | | | | 6,447,869 |
| | | | | |
Other assets and liabilities, net: 0.1% | | | | | 5,806 |
| | | | | |
Total net assets: 100.0% | | | | $ | 6,453,675 |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Growth of $10,000 as of June 30, 2006
Cumulative total return for the six months ended June 30, 2006
|
This graph illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the AARP Aggressive Fund from January 1, 2006 (commencement of operations) through June 30, 2006, compared to the Aggressive Composite Index* and the MSCI Investable Market 2500 Index.* |
This hypothetical example does not represent the returns of any particular investment.
Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit www.aarpfunds.com or call (800) 958-6457. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured.
* | The fund’s performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The Aggressive Composite Index and the MSCI U.S. Investable Market 2500 Index have been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the indexes. For more information on the Aggressive Composite Index and the MSCI U.S. Investable Market 2500 Index, please see “A Word about Benchmarks” on page 7. |
AARP Aggressive Fund Overview AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 13
AARP Aggressive Fund
Portfolio construction
Performance commentary
The AARP Aggressive Fund seeks growth of capital and some current income. It targets an asset allocation of 60% U.S. stocks, 15% international stocks and 25% bonds.
For the six months ending June 30, 2006, the AARP Aggressive Fund returned 2.60%, as compared to the Aggressive Composite Index of 3.32% and as compared to the MSCI U.S. Investable Market 2500 Index return of 3.29%. The Fund tracked its benchmark index closely, after a brief startup period. Of course, an index fund very rarely matches the performance of its benchmark index exactly, since a fund has operating expenses and an index does not.
For the six month period, the key contributor to the Fund’s performance was its investment in the U.S. Stock Market Portfolio. Within the U.S. stock market (as measured by the MSCI U.S. Investable Market 2500 Index), the energy, financial and industrials sectors all contributed to performance. In particular, ExxonMobil, the largest stock in the index, added 0.15% to the performance of the benchmark, returning 6.0%, driven by the global demand for oil. Conversely, the information technology (-6%) and healthcare sectors (-4%) were down for the period. Although a lesser weighting, the Fund’s investment in the International Stock Market Portfolio was a net contributor to performance during the period. International stocks, as measured by the MSCI EAFE Index, generated a positive return of 10.16% for the period, with every sector in the index producing a positive return. The major contributors from a sector standpoint were financials, materials and healthcare. Against the indexes, the Fund’s performance was negatively impacted by fund expenses (the indexes do not have expenses) and tracking differences as the Fund began operations.
14 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT AARP Aggressive Fund
Understanding Your Expenses
As a shareholder of a Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including investment advisory fees, distribution (12b-1) fees, shareholder services fees, and other expenses of running a fund. In addition, if you sell shares within 60 days of purchase you may have to pay a redemption fee. As discussed earlier, it’s important to understand exactly how much you pay to purchase and own a fund and to compare the costs of owning different funds because these costs reduce your returns.
The example in the table on the next page is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs in dollars of investing in an AARP Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006.
Actual expenses
The first line for each Fund in the table on the next page, labeled “Actual,” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use this information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the line labeled “Actual” under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The second line for each fund in the table, labeled “Hypothetical,” helps you compare the costs of an AARP Fund to other funds. It provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on a Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not a Fund’s actual return. You should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures help you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in an AARP Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees. Therefore, the line labeled “Hypothetical” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. If these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
In addition to the fees and expenses which the Fund bears directly, the Fund indirectly bears a pro rata share of the fees and expenses of the underlying portfolios in which the Fund invests. Because the underlying funds have varied expenses and fee levels and the Fund may own different proportions of the underlying funds at different times, the amount of fees and expenses incurred indirectly by the Fund may vary in the future. However, AARP Financial has agreed contractually to waive fees and reimburse expenses to keep the net total operating expenses of the AARP Funds, including the indirect fees and expenses of the underlying portfolios, at 0.50% of average daily net assets through November 1, 2007.
Understanding Your Expenses AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 15
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning account value 1/1/06 | | Ending account value 6/30/06 | | Expenses paid during period1 |
AARP Conservative Fund | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | $ | 1,002.40 | | $ | 1.19 |
Hypothetical | | $ | 1,000 | | $ | 1,023.60 | | $ | 1.20 |
(assuming a 5% return before expenses) | | | | | | | | | |
AARP Moderate Fund | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | $ | 1,014.40 | | $ | 1.20 |
Hypothetical | | $ | 1,000 | | $ | 1,023.60 | | $ | 1.20 |
(assuming a 5% return before expenses) | | | | | | | | | |
AARP Aggressive Fund | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | $ | 1,026.00 | | $ | 1.21 |
Hypothetical | | $ | 1,000 | | $ | 1,023.60 | | $ | 1.20 |
(assuming a 5% return before expenses) | | | | | | | | | |
1 | Expenses reflect the fund’s annualized net expense ratios multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The annualized net expense ratios are as follows: AARP Conservative Fund 0.24%, AARP Moderate Fund 0.24%, AARP Aggressive Fund 0.24%. |
The example above is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006.
16 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT Understanding Your Expenses
How to Read Financial Statements
Mutual funds are companies that pool money from many investors and invest that money in stocks, bonds and other securities and assets. Mutual fund financial statements show investors where a fund’s money came from, where it went, where it is and what it is worth as of the close of the fund’s most recent fiscal period. The portfolio of investments shows where the money is as of the close of the fund’s most recent fiscal period. The combined holdings of each AARP Fund as of June 30, 2006 are shown in the individual Fund Overview sections of this annual report. In addition, this section of the annual report contains four additional financial statements:
1. Statements of assets and liabilities.
These statements are the Funds’ balance sheets as of the close of the period (June 30, 2006). They show the value and the cost of what each Fund owned, how much it owed to others and the resulting difference or “net assets”.
• | | Assets are the stocks, bonds, cash, and other financial instruments that a fund owns and has purchased with monies investors pay when they purchase shares. |
• | | Liabilities are the amounts of money that a fund owes. Liabilities include payments due for the purchase of financial investments as well as bills that a fund incurs for services that are needed to run a fund, such as legal services and printing. |
• | | Net assets = total assets – total liabilities. Net assets represent what is left of assets after liabilities are subtracted. This leftover amount belongs to the investors, or shareholders, of the fund. |
2. Statements of operations
These statements provide a summary of the investment income, such as dividends, that a fund has earned as well as gains and losses from its investment activities for the period ended June 30, 2006. Realized gains or losses reflect the difference between purchase price and selling price for transactions that took place during the period. Unrealized gains and losses reflect the difference between purchase price and the value of positions that are still held as of the end of the period. The statements also include specific details of fund expenses.
3. Statements of changes in net assets
These statements describe the increases or decreases in net assets during the period, which result from operations, any distributions of earnings to investors, and any shareholder transactions.
4. Financial highlights
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand a fund’s financial performance for a share outstanding for the entire period ended June 30, 2006.
The Notes to Financial Statements provide additional information to help you better understand the financial statements. They include a description of the most important accounting policies used in portraying the company’s financial condition and results, including how a fund records and values it investments, tax information, as well as additional detail on shareholder and investment transactions.
How to Read Financial Statements AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 17
Financial Statements
Statements of assets and liabilities
June 30, 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | AARP Conservative Fund | | | AARP Moderate Fund | | | AARP Aggressive Fund | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost of $6,696,059, 13,338,038 and 6,536,538, respectively) | | $ | 6,590,586 | | | $ | 13,126,854 | | | $ | 6,447,869 | |
Dividends receivable | | | 65,067 | | | | 108,878 | | | | 43,701 | |
Receivable from advisor | | | 75,112 | | | | 103,245 | | | | 92,408 | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | — | | | | 1,497 | | | | — | |
Receivable for fund shares sold | | | 825 | | | | 8,274 | | | | 1,325 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 6,731,590 | | | $ | 13,348,748 | | | $ | 6,585,303 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payable for investments purchased | | | 65,612 | | | | 117,153 | | | | 45,026 | |
Payable for fund shares redeemed | | | 280 | | | | 1,497 | | | | — | |
Payable for Trustees’ fees | | | 2,483 | | | | 2,483 | | | | 2,483 | |
Payable for portfolio accounting fees (Note 6) | | | 2,865 | | | | 2,899 | | | | 2,975 | |
Payable for administrative services (Note 6) | | | 180 | | | | 356 | | | | 179 | |
Payable for transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses (Note 6) | | | 9,915 | | | | 18,875 | | | | 11,201 | |
Payable for distribution service fees | | | 2,622 | | | | 5,008 | | | | 2,688 | |
Payable for audit fee | | | 12,333 | | | | 12,333 | | | | 12,333 | |
Payable for legal fees | | | 34,035 | | | | 34,035 | | | | 34,035 | |
Payable for printing fees | | | 17,500 | | | | 17,500 | | | | 17,500 | |
Other accrued expenses and liabilities | | | 3,229 | | | | 3,956 | | | | 3,208 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 151,054 | | | $ | 216,095 | | | $ | 131,628 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets | | $ | 6,580,536 | | | $ | 13,132,653 | | | $ | 6,453,675 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets consist of: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | $ | 6,688,926 | | | $ | 13,352,374 | | | $ | 6,549,512 | |
Net unrealized depreciation on investments | | | (105,473 | ) | | | (211,184 | ) | | | (88,669 | ) |
Accumulated net realized loss on investments | | | (2,922 | ) | | | (8,541 | ) | | | (7,172 | ) |
Undistributed net investment income | | | 5 | | | | 4 | | | | 4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets | | $ | 6,580,536 | | | $ | 13,132,653 | | | $ | 6,453,675 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | | | 667,367 | | | | 1,308,498 | | | | 634,546 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value per share | | $ | 9.86 | | | $ | 10.04 | | | $ | 10.17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
18 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements
Financial Statements (continued)
Statements of operations
Period ended June 30, 20061
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | AARP Conservative Fund | | | AARP Moderate Fund | | | AARP Aggressive Fund | |
Investment income: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from affiliated issuers | | $ | 84,547 | | | $ | 138,741 | | | $ | 59,303 | |
| | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee (Note 6) | | | 148 | | | | 280 | | | | 161 | |
Administrative services (Note 6) | | | 518 | | | | 979 | | | | 562 | |
Registration fees | | | 27,782 | | | | 30,265 | | | | 28,396 | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses (Note 6) | | | 30,530 | | | | 56,958 | | | | 47,207 | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 20,233 | | | | 20,233 | | | | 20,233 | |
Auditing fees | | | 16,500 | | | | 16,500 | | | | 16,500 | |
Legal fees | | | 34,035 | | | | 34,035 | | | | 34,035 | |
Portfolio accounting fees (Note 6) | | | 7,872 | | | | 7,899 | | | | 7,975 | |
Distribution service fees | | | 2,958 | | | | 5,594 | | | | 3,210 | |
Printing and postage | | | 17,500 | | | | 17,500 | | | | 17,500 | |
Insurance expense | | | 10,476 | | | | 10,476 | | | | 10,476 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | $ | 171,052 | | | $ | 203,219 | | | $ | 188,755 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Waivers and reimbursements (Note 6): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser | | | (167,401 | ) | | | (196,371 | ) | | | (184,865 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net expenses | | | 3,651 | | | | 6,848 | | | | 3,890 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 80,896 | | | | 131,893 | | | | 55,413 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized loss on affiliated investments | | | (3,063 | ) | | | (8,776 | ) | | | (7,511 | ) |
Net realized gain on nonaffiliated investments | | | 141 | | | | 235 | | | | 339 | |
Net change in unrealized depreciation on investments | | | (105,473 | ) | | | (211,184 | ) | | | (88,669 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss on investments | | | (108,395 | ) | | | (219,725 | ) | | | (95,841 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | | $ | (27,499 | ) | | $ | (87,832 | ) | | $ | (40,428 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | For the period from December 22, 2005 (inception date) through June 30, 2006. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Financial Statements AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 19
Statements of changes in net assets
Period ended June 30, 20061
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | AARP Conservative Fund | | | AARP Moderate Fund | | | AARP Aggressive Fund | |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 80,896 | | | $ | 131,893 | | | $ | 55,413 | |
Net realized loss on investments | | | (2,922 | ) | | | (8,541 | ) | | | (7,172 | ) |
Net change in unrealized depreciation of investments | | | (105,473 | ) | | | (211,184 | ) | | | (88,669 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | | | (27,499 | ) | | | (87,832 | ) | | | (40,428 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | (80,891 | ) | | | (131,889 | ) | | | (55,409 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share transactions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | 6,690,868 | | | | 13,442,261 | | | | 6,547,117 | |
Net asset value of shares issued on reinvestment of dividends | | | 72,536 | | | | 124,549 | | | | 51,294 | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | (107,478 | ) | | | (247,436 | ) | | | (82,899 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in net assets resulting from share transactions | | | 6,655,926 | | | | 13,319,374 | | | | 6,515,512 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in net assets | | | 6,547,536 | | | | 13,099,653 | | | | 6,419,675 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | $ | 33,000 | | | $ | 33,000 | | | $ | 34,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
End of period | | $ | 6,580,536 | | | $ | 13,132,653 | | | $ | 6,453,675 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Undistributed net investment income included in net assets at end of period | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | For the period from December 22, 2005 (fund inception date) through June 30, 2006. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
20 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Statements
Financial Statements (continued)
Financial highlights
Six months ended June 30, 20061 (For a share outstanding throughout the period)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | AARP Conservative Fund | | | AARP Moderate Fund | | | AARP Aggressive Fund | |
Net asset value, beginning of period2 | | $ | 10.00 | | | $ | 10.00 | | | $ | 10.00 | |
| | | |
Income from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | 0.16 | | | | 0.10 | | | | 0.09 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | | (0.14 | ) | | | 0.04 | | | | 0.17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.02 | | | | 0.14 | | | | 0.26 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distributions from net investment income | | | (0.16 | ) | | | (0.10 | ) | | | (0.09 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 9.86 | | | $ | 10.04 | | | $ | 10.17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return3 | | | 0.24 | % | | | 1.44 | % | | | 2.60 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratios to average net assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net expenses4 | | | 0.24 | %5 | | | 0.24 | %5 | | | 0.24 | %5 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | 5.31 | %5 | | | 4.58 | %5 | | | 3.36 | %5 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expense waiver/reimbursement6 | | | (11.00 | )%5 | | | (6.82 | )%5 | | | (11.22 | )%5 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted) | | $ | 6,581 | | | $ | 13,133 | | | $ | 6,454 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 7 | % | | | 5 | % | | | 7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | For the period from January 1, 2006 (commencement of operations) to June 30, 2006. |
2 | As of the Funds’ inception date, December 22, 2005. |
3 | Based on net asset value, which does not reflect the sales charge, redemption fee or contingent deferred sales charge, if applicable. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. |
4 | In addition to the fees and expenses which the funds bear directly, the funds indirectly bear a pro-rata share of the fees and expenses of the underlying portfolios in which the funds invest. The net expense ratio shown does not include these indirect expenses. If included, the net expense ratio for each fund would be 0.50%. |
5 | Computed on an annualized basis. |
6 | This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income (loss) ratios shown above. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Financial Statements AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 21
Notes to Financial Statements
1. Business and Organization
AARP Conservative Fund, AARP Moderate Fund and AARP Aggressive Fund (the “Funds”) are each a series of AARP Funds (the “Trust”). The Trust is organized as a Delaware statutory trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The inception date of the Funds was December 22, 2005; the Funds began operations, including recording income and expenses, on January 1, 2006 (“commencement of operations”). The Funds are “funds of funds” because they invest substantially all of their assets in the underlying series (the “Underlying Portfolios”) of AARP Portfolios, a separately registered investment company. Each Fund invests in all three of the AARP Portfolios, but in different amounts. The investment objective of the AARP Conservative Fund is to seek primarily current income with some growth of capital. The investment objective of the AARP Moderate Fund is to seek a balance of growth of capital and current income. The investment objective of the AARP Aggressive Fund is to seek growth of capital and some current income.
2. Significant accounting policies
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements.
INVESTMENT VALUATION
Because the Funds invest in the three Underlying Portfolios, they value their investments in the Underlying Portfolios daily at the closing net asset value of each Underlying Portfolio.
Securities of the Underlying Portfolios are valued as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) on the valuation date. An independent pricing service generally provides these prices. Stock holdings are valued at the latest quoted sales price or official closing price taken from the primary market in which the stock trades. If a security does not trade during the day, it is valued at the average of the latest quotes for buying and selling the security, the bid and asked prices. Bond holdings are generally valued as reported by an independent pricing service at what is called an “evaluated average price,” which considers such factors as comparable bond prices, yields, maturities and ratings. Short-term investments with a maturity at issuance of 365 days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Foreign securities quoted in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon exchange rates prevailing at the close of trading and as provided by an independent source.
22 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT Notes to Financial Statements
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or whose values have been materially affected by events occurring before the Fund’s pricing time but after the close of the securities’ primary markets (e.g. foreign securities), are valued by methods deemed by the board of trustees of AARP Portfolios to represent fair value.
FEDERAL TAXES
The Funds intend to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies. The Funds plan to distribute substantially all of their investment company taxable income, including any net realized gain on investments not offset by capital loss carryforwards, if any, to shareholders. For these reasons, no federal income or excise tax provision is required.
SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS, DIVIDEND AND INTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSES
Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis, the date the Fund agrees to purchase or sell a security. Interest income, if any, is recorded daily on an accrual basis. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Expenses are accrued daily. Many expenses are directly attributable to one Fund and therefore are charged accordingly. Expenses that are not directly attributable to one or more Funds are allocated among applicable Funds on an equitable and consistent basis considering such things as the nature and type of expenses and the relative net assets of the Funds.
USE OF MANAGEMENT ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported changes in net assets during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
INDEMNIFICATIONS
The Funds’ organizational documents provide current trustees and officers with a limited indemnification against liabilities arising in connection with the performance of their duties to the Funds. In the normal course of business, the Funds may also enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would be dependent on future claims that may be made against the Funds. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
Notes to Financial Statements AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 23
DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS
Dividends and distributions to shareholders, which are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Capital gain distributions, if any, are generally declared and paid annually. Income distributions, if any, are generally declared and paid quarterly for the AARP Conservative Fund and semi-annually for the AARP Moderate Fund and the AARP Aggressive Fund.
INVESTMENTS IN UNDERLYING PORTFOLIOS
In addition to the fees and expenses which the Funds bear directly, the Funds indirectly bear a pro-rata share of the fees and expenses of the Underlying Portfolios in which the Funds invest.
3. Capital share transactions
The Funds have authorized an unlimited number of $0.001 par value shares. Transactions in shares were as follows:
| | | |
AARP Conservative Fund | | | |
Period ended June 30, 20061 | | | |
Shares sold | | 667,421 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | 7,395 | |
Shares Redeemed | | (10,749 | ) |
| | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | 664,067 | |
| | | |
AARP Moderate Fund | | | |
Period ended June 30, 20061 | | | |
Shares sold | | 1,317,120 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | 12,619 | |
Shares Redeemed | | (24,541 | ) |
| | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | 1,305,198 | |
| | | |
AARP Aggressive Fund | | | |
Period ended June 30, 20061 | | | |
Shares sold | | 634,167 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | 5,155 | |
Shares Redeemed | | (8,176 | ) |
| | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | 631,146 | |
| | | |
1 | For the period from December 22, 2005 (Fund inception date) through June 30, 2006. |
4. Purchases and sales of securities
The aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities, other than short-term obligations, for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Fund name | | Purchases | | Sales |
AARP Conservative Fund | | $ | 6,956,033 | | $ | 257,052 |
AARP Moderate Fund | | | 13,700,936 | | | 354,357 |
AARP Aggressive Fund | | | 6,813,666 | | | 269,957 |
24 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT Notes to Financial Statements
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
5. Federal income tax information
Net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) may differ for financial statement and tax purposes. The character of dividends and distributions made during the fiscal year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences are attributable to the differing treatments for the deferral of losses on wash sales. Also, due to timing of dividends and distributions, the fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the fiscal year in which the income or net realized gain was recorded by a Fund. Additionally, short-term capital gains are considered ordinary income for income tax purposes.
The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Distributions paid from: |
Fund name | | Ordinary income | | Long-term capital gains | | Total |
AARP Conservative Fund | | $ | 80,891 | | $ | — | | $ | 80,891 |
AARP Moderate Fund | | | 131,889 | | | — | | | 131,889 |
AARP Aggressive Fund | | | 55,409 | | | — | | | 55,409 |
The table below shows distribution requirements the Funds must satisfy under the income tax regulations. In addition the table shows losses the Funds may be able to offset against income and gains realized in future years as well as unrealized appreciation or depreciation of securities and other investments for federal income tax purposes. Under current tax law, certain capital and net foreign currency losses realized after October 31 within the taxable year may be deferred and treated as occurring on the first day of the following year.
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fund name | | Undistributed net investment income | | Post October Losses Deferred | | Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) based on cost of securities and other investments for federal income tax purposes | |
AARP Conservative Fund | | $ | 211 | | $ | — | | $ | (108,601 | ) |
AARP Moderate Fund | | | 98 | | | — | | | (219,819 | ) |
AARP Aggressive Fund | | | 4 | | | 79 | | | (95,762 | ) |
Notes to Financial Statements AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 25
The aggregate cost of securities and other investments and the composition of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of securities and other investments for federal income tax purposes as of June 30, 2006 are noted below. The primary difference between appreciation or depreciation of securities and other investments as recorded in compliance with tax rules and those same items recorded in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, if applicable, is attributable to the tax deferral of losses or the tax realization of financial statement unrealized gain or loss.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fund name | | Federal tax cost of securities | | Gross unrealized Appreciation | | Gross unrealized Depreciation | | | Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | |
AARP Conservative Fund | | $ | 6,699,187 | | $ | 0 | | $ | (108,601 | ) | | $ | (108,601 | ) |
AARP Moderate Fund | | | 13,346,673 | | | 0 | | | (219,819 | ) | | | (219,819 | ) |
AARP Aggressive Fund | | | 6,543,631 | | | 3,702 | | | (99,464 | ) | | | (95,762 | ) |
6. Fees and other transactions with affiliates
ADVISER AND SUB-ADVISER FEES
The Trust has an investment advisory agreement with AARP Financial Incorporated, “AARP Financial,” which delegates to AARP Financial the responsibility to manage the investment activities of the Funds, including the overall investment program of the Funds. AARP Financial is also responsible for overseeing the Funds’ sub-adviser, SSgA Funds Management, Inc. (“SSgA FM”), which rebalances the Funds under the direction of AARP Financial and manages the day-to-day investments of the Underlying Portfolios’ assets. Each Fund pays to AARP Financial an annual fee of 0.01% of its average daily net assets. AARP Financial pays SSgA FM for its sub-advisory services out of these fees. Through at least November 30, 2007, AARP Financial has contractually agreed to waive its fees and/or reimburse expenses to keep the total annual operating expenses of the Funds and the Underlying Portfolios at 0.50% of average daily net assets. The expense reimbursement amount payable by AARP Financial will be dependent on the actual expenses of the Funds and the Portfolios.
26 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT Notes to Financial Statements
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, AARP Financial contractually waived/reimbursed the following fees:
| | | | | | |
Fund name | | Adviser fee waiver | | Reimbursement of other operating expenses |
AARP Conservative Fund | | $ | 148 | | $ | 167,253 |
AARP Moderate Fund | | | 280 | | | 196,091 |
AARP Aggressive Fund | | | 161 | | | 184,704 |
ADMINISTRATION FEES
As the Funds’ administrator, AARP Financial provides the Funds with general administrative services associated with the day-to-day operations of the Funds and monitors and coordinates the activities of the other service providers to the Funds. For its administrative services, AARP Financial receives an annual fee of .035% of each Fund’s average daily net assets.
SUB-ADMINISTRATION, TRANSFER AGENCY AND CUSTODIAN FEES
State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”) acts as the sub-administrator, transfer agent, custodian and fund accounting agent for the Funds. State Street is a subsidiary of State Street Corporation and an affiliate of SSgA FM. Under the terms of the sub-administration agreement, AARP Financial pays to State Street an annual fee at the rate of 0.0175% of the first $6 billion of the Funds’ average daily net assets and then a decreasing rate for average daily net assets above that level. Under the terms of the transfer agency agreement, each Fund pays to State Street an annual fee at the rate of 0.135% of the first $5 billion of the Funds’ average daily net assets and then a decreasing rate for average daily net assets above that level, plus out-of-pocket expenses. State Street has in turn delegated the provision of transfer agency services to its affili-ate, Boston Financial Data Services, Inc. Under the terms of the custody agreement, each Fund pays to State Street an annual fee of $15,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses.
REDEMPTION FEES
The Funds impose a 2.00% redemption fee to shareholders who redeem shares held for 60 days or less. All redemption fees are recorded by the Funds as additions to paid-in-capital. For the period ended June 30, 2006, the redemption fees for the AARP Conservative Fund, AARP Moderate Fund and AARP Aggressive Fund shares amounted to $1,580, $539 and $31, respectively.
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
The AARP Money Market Fund was introduced on June 30, 2006 and commenced operations on July 1, 2006.
Notes to Financial Statements AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 27
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Trustees and Shareholders of AARP Funds:
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of AARP Conservative Fund, AARP Moderate Fund and AARP Aggressive Fund, each a series of the AARP Funds (collectively the “Funds”), including the portfolios of investments, as of June 30, 2006, and the related statements of operations and the statements of changes in net assets for the period from December 22, 2005 (inception date) to June 30, 2006, and the financial highlights for the period from January 1, 2006 (commencement of operations) to June 30, 3006. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of June 30, 2006 by correspondence with the transfer agent of the underlying portfolios, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AARP Conservative Fund, AARP Moderate Fund and AARP Aggressive Fund, as of June 30, 2006, the results of their operations, and the changes in their net assets for the period from December 22, 2005 to June 30, 2006, and the financial highlights for the period from January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Boston, Massachusetts
August 23, 2006
28 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
AARP Funds—Supplemental Information (unaudited)
2006 U.S. Tax Distribution Information to Shareholders
Corporate Dividends Received Deduction. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, a percentage of dividends distributed by the Funds listed below qualify for the dividends received deduction for corporate shareholders. These percentages are as follows:
| | | |
Fund | | Qualifying Percentages | |
AARP Conservative Fund | | 7.15 | % |
AARP Moderate Fund | | 16.88 | |
AARP Aggressive Fund | | 33.20 | |
Qualified Dividend Income. The amount of dividends distributed by the Funds during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 are considered qualified dividend income, and are eligible for reduced tax rates. These lower rates range from 5% to 15% depending on an individual’s tax bracket. These amounts and corresponding percentage of dividends paid are as follows:
| | | | | | |
Fund | | Percentage of Dividends Paid | | | Amounts |
AARP Conservative Fund | | 13 | % | | $ | 10,488 |
AARP Moderate Fund | | 31 | % | | | 41,115 |
AARP Aggressive Fund | | 58 | % | | | 32,161 |
Proxy voting policies, procedures and record
Both a description of the policies and procedures that AARP Financial uses to determine how to vote proxies on behalf of the Funds and the Underlying Portfolios relating to portfolios securities and information regarding how AARP Financial voted proxies related to portfolio securities during the most recent fiscal year ended June 30 is available on our web site at www.aarpfunds.com and, without charge, upon request, by calling us at (800) 958-6457. Such information for the AARP Funds is also available on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) website at www.sec.gov.
Shareholder statements and reports
When we send financial reports, prospectuses and other regulatory materials to shareholders, we attempt to reduce the volume of mail you receive by sending one copy of these documents to two or more account holders who share the same address. However, if you wish to receive individual copies of materials, please contact us at (800) 958-6457. Once we have received your instructions, we will begin sending individual copies for each account within 30 days.
Statement regarding availability of quarterly fund schedule
The Funds and Underlying Portfolios file complete schedules of investments with the SEC for the quarters ended September 30 and March 31 of each fiscal year (commencing with the quarter ended March 31, 2006) on Form N-Q which will be available on the SEC’s
AARP Funds–Supplemental Information AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 29
website at www.sec.gov. Additionally, the Funds’ and Underlying Portfolios’ Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington DC. For information on the Public Reference Room, call (800) SEC-0330.
Board deliberations regarding the approval of the AARP Funds’ Investment Advisory Agreement and Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement
AARP Funds (“Trust”) has entered into an Investment Advisory Agreement (“Advisory Agreement”) with AARP Financial Incorporated (“AARP Financial”). The Trust and AARP Financial have entered into an Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement (“Sub-Advisory Agreement” and, together with the Advisory Agreement, “Agreements”) with SSgA Funds Management Inc. (“SSgA FM”).
The Board of Trustees of the Trust, including the Trustees of the Trust who are not “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of that term as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“Independent Trustees”), unanimously approved each of the Agreements for an initial term of two years for each of the Funds at an “in person” meeting held on October 14, 2005.
In determining to approve the Agreements, the Trustees reviewed and evaluated all information and factors they believed, in light of legal advice furnished to them by independent legal counsel and through the exercise of their own business judgment, to be relevant and appropriate. Among other information, the Board reviewed: (i) the responses of each of AARP Financial and SSgA FM to requests for information made by counsel to the Independent Trustees and (ii) information regarding the proposed investment advisory and other fees and estimated total expenses of each of the Funds as compared to generally similar funds. The Board’s decision to approve the Agreements was based on a comprehensive consideration of all of the information provided to the Board in connection with the contract approval process and otherwise, and was not based on any single factor. Each member of the Board may have weighed certain factors differently. Some of the more significant considerations of the Board are summarized below.
The nature, extent and quality of the services proposed to be provided by AARP Financial and SSgA FM
In evaluating the nature, extent and quality of AARP Financial’s and SSgA FM’s proposed services, the Trustees considered the types of services to be provided under the Agreements and the capabilities, personnel and other resources of AARP Financial and SSgA FM. They noted that AARP Financial would be responsible for managing the investment activities of the Funds, including providing the overall investment program and asset allocation of the Funds, overseeing SSgA FM, and for assessing whether
30 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT AARP Funds – Supplemental Information
AARP Funds—Supplemental Information (unaudited)
(continued)
the Funds, as designed, meet the needs of shareholders and potential investors. They noted that SSgA FM would be responsible for rebalancing the Funds’ portfolios to meet the target allocations set by AARP Financial. In considering the services to be rendered, the Trustees reviewed the organizational structure and the responsibilities of AARP Financial and SSgA FM, as well as the qualifications of key personnel. The Board considered that AARP Financial was newly created and had no prior investment advisory experience. With respect to SSgA FM, the Trustees reviewed, among other things, information regarding SSgA FM’s approach to making investment decisions, organization and management, and the experience of SSgA FM’s personnel who would be providing advisory services to the Funds. The Board noted, in particular, the team created by AARP Financial to provide investment management services to the Funds and the scale and depth of SSgA FM’s capabilities in managing asset allocation strategies.
In addition to investment management and advisory services, the Board considered the quality of the administrative and other non-advisory services proposed to be provided by AARP Financial, SSgA FM or their affiliates, including administration and shareholder support services proposed to be provided by AARP Financial, the proposed license by AARP of its name and use of its member list to ALPS Distributors, Inc. (which, as the proposed distributor of the Trust’s shares, would use the member list in connection with the distribution of the Funds’ shares and the license to sub-license the use of the AARP name to the Trust), and the custody, transfer agency, sub-administration and accounting services proposed to be provided to the Trust by State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”), an affiliate of SSgA FM.
In evaluating the services, the Trustees also considered AARP Financial’s and SSgA FM’s compliance programs and AARP Financial’s anticipated capability to monitor and assess SSgA FM’s performance and compliance program. Based on their review, the Trustees concluded that, overall, the nature, extent and quality of proposed investment management and sub-advisory services to be provided to the Trust and to each of the Funds under the Agreements supported approval of the Agreements.
Investment performance
The Board noted that the Funds have not commenced operations and so had no investment or performance history. The Board also noted that AARP Financial was a newly created investment adviser with no clients and, therefore, no investment performance with respect to other investment advisory clients. Finally, the Board considered representations by AARP Financial and SSgA FM as to SSgA FM’s prior experience with asset allocation investment strategies. The Board concluded that the lack of any prior investment performance directly apposite of the proposed investment strategy did not preclude approval of the Agreements, given the other factors and considerations.
AARP Funds – Supplemental Information AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 31
The costs of services to be provided and profits to be realized by AARP Financial and SSgA FM from their relationship with the Funds.
In evaluating the investment management and sub-advisory fees and expenses, the Trustees considered the proposed investment management and sub-advisory fee arrangements with respect to each of the Funds and each Fund’s expected expense ratios, keeping in mind that the Funds are intended to invest in series of AARP Portfolios (“Portfolios”) in a funds-of-funds structure. In light of this fact, the Board considered the investment advisory fees of the Funds in combination with those of the series of the Portfolios in which such Funds would invest, since the Board recognized that shareholders of the Funds ultimately would bear the costs of both levels of investment advisory fees. The Board also noted the relative difficulty of evaluating investment advisory fees in the context of funds-of-funds, given the two-tiered nature of the advisory fees.
The Board considered the fees in absolute terms, as well as compared with the fees and expenses of (1) peer groups of funds with similar investment objectives compiled by an independent third party and (2) two lists of funds compiled by AARP Financial that AARP Financial considered to be generally similar to the Funds (i.e., one of funds that are funds-of-funds and one that included funds that are directly managed and had investment advisory fees that more easily could be compared to the combined advisory fees of the Funds and Portfolios). The Board considered that AARP Financial proposed to pay the proposed investment sub-advisory fees to SSgA FM out of its investment management fees.
The Trustees observed that, by virtue of a proposed Fee Waiver and Expense Reimbursement Agreement, AARP Financial proposed to limit the net total annual operating expenses of each of the Funds to 0.50% annually of average daily net assets, including in each case the expenses of the underlying Portfolios in which the Fund would invest. In light of these arrangements, the Board noted that the Funds’, as well as the Funds’ and Portfolios’ combined, total expense ratios would be lower than the average total expense ratios of the peer groups selected by the independent third party and the directly managed funds provided for comparison by AARP Financial. The Trustees also observed the Funds’ advisory fees as compared to the peer groups selected by the independent third party and the funds-of-funds provided for comparison by AARP Financial and determined that the advisory fees to be paid by the Funds, as well as by the Funds and Portfolios combined, compared favorably with the information on fees provided.
The Trustees observed that AARP Financial had no other advisory clients and, therefore, had no other information available on advisory fees
32 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT AARP Funds–Supplemental Information
AARP Funds—Supplemental Information (unaudited)
(continued)
it would charge to comparable clients. The Trustees reviewed certain comparative information on fees provided by SSgA FM. The Trustees also noted the other fees that AARP Financial and affiliates of SSgA FM were proposed to receive for providing other, non-advisory services proposed to be provided to the Portfolios.
Based on these factors and considerations, the Board concluded that the proposed investment management and investment sub-advisory fees seemed reasonable and appropriate in light of the nature of the Funds and services proposed to be provided.
The Trustees noted that, with respect to projected profitability under the Agreements, during the initial two year terms of the Agreements: (1) AARP Financial did not expect to make a profit under the Advisory Agreement (nor did AARP Financial and its affiliates expect to make a profit on the relationship with the Trust as a whole, including with respect to the receipt of administration fees); and (2) SSgA FM had explained that it had been unable to present for Board consideration projected profitability information given that there was no existing relationship upon which to base assumptions. The Trustees also noted AARP Financial’s representation that it was committed to sharing economies of scale with the Funds by lowering fees as the Funds grow in size.
The Trustees noted the other, indirect benefits that may accrue to AARP Financial and SSgA FM and their affiliates as a result of their proposed relationships with the Funds, including AARP Financial’s expectation that AARP Financial or its affiliates might be able to cross-sell other products and services to shareholders in the Funds. The Trustees determined that these potential benefits were not inappropriate in the context of the overall investment advisory arrangements and fees proposed.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow and whether fee levels reflect any such economies of scale
The Trustees noted that the investment advisory fee schedules proposed for the Funds do not currently contain breakpoints that reduce the fee rate paid by the Funds on assets above specified levels. The Trustees also noted AARP Financial’s representation that, although the currently-proposed investment advisory fees do not reflect breakpoints, AARP Financial will be proactive in passing on the benefits of economies of scale to the Funds both with respect to its investment management services and more generally with respect to all services provided to the Funds by or under the supervision of AARP Financial. The Board concluded that AARP Financial’s willingness to commit to passing on the benefits of economies of scale supported approval of the Agreements.
AARP Funds – Supplemental Information AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 33
About the Funds’ Board of Trustees and Officers (unaudited)
The trustees of the AARP Funds oversee the operation and management the Funds.
A number of AARP Funds’ board members are independent, meaning that they are not “interested persons” of AARP Funds for purposes of the Investment Company Act. Put simply, this means that they do not have material affiliations with AARP Funds, AARP Financial or SSgA FM apart from the personal investments they may have made in AARP Funds as private individuals.
Our independent board members bring distinguished backgrounds in business, academia and public service to their task of working with AARP Funds officers to establish policies and oversee the activities of the Funds.
The table below shows information for each trustee and executive officer of AARP Funds. The mailing address of the trustees and officers is AARP Funds, P.O. Box 8035, Boston, MA 02266-8035.
Independent trustees
| | |
PETER C. CLAPMAN c/o AARP Funds Two Highwood Drive, 2nd Floor Tewsksbury MA 01876 Age: 70 Chairman of the Board and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant, governance advisory services (July 2005–present) Head of U.S. operations, Governance for Owners (governance services and consulting) (June 2005–present) Executive Director, Pace Law School (director education) (April 2005–present) Senior Vice President and Chief Counsel TIAA-CREF (financial services, pension and investment products) (1972–July 2005). Other trusteeships held: Director, National Association of Corporate Trustees (non-profit private director education) (January 2005–present) |
| |
RICHARD M. REILLY c/o AARP Funds Two Highwood Drive, 2nd Floor Tewsksbury MA 01876 Age: 68 Trustee since 2006 | | Self-Employed Consultant (November 2002–present) Senior Vice President, Allmerica Financial Corp. (financial services holding company) (November 2001–November 2002) President, Allmerica Financial Services (investments/insurance) (1995–November 2001). Other trusteeships held: Trustee, Allmerica Investment Trust (investment company) (1990–November 2002) Trustee, Allmerica Securities Trust (1990–November 2002) |
34 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT About the Funds’ Board of Trustees and Officers
About the Funds’ Board of Trustees and Officers (continued)
| | |
ELLEN B. SAFIR, CFA c/o AARP Funds Two Highwood Drive, 2nd Floor Tewsksbury MA 01876 Age: 61 Trustee since 2006 | | Chief Executive Officer, New Century Advisors, LLC (registered investment adviser) (2002–present) Managing Director, Fixed Income and Currencies, Howard Hughes Medical Institute (medical research) (1986–2002) |
| |
LYNN E. TURNER c/o AARP Funds Two Highwood Drive, 2nd Floor Tewsksbury MA 01876 Age: 54 Trustee since 2005 | | Managing Director of Research, Glass Lewis & Co. LLC (financial and proxy research) (July 2003–present) Managing Director/Senior Advisor, Kroll Inc. (forensic accounting) (July 2003–present) Professor, Colorado State University (August 2001–June 2003) Chief Accountant, Securities and Exchange Commission (July 1998–August 2001) |
| |
Interested trustee | | |
| |
DAWN M. SWEENEY 650 F Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 Age: 46 Trustee since 2005 | | President, AARP Services, Inc. (August 2002–present) Associate Executive Director, Membership, AARP (December 1999–August 2002) Ms. Sweeney is considered an interested trustee due to her positions as director of AARP Financial and President of AARP Services, Inc., the parent of AARP Financial. |
| |
Officers | | |
| |
LARRY C. RENFRO c/o AARP Financial Incorporated Two Highwood Drive, 2nd Floor Tewksbury MA 01876 Age: 52 President | | President, AARP Financial (October 2005–present) Managing Director, Renfro Associates/Devonshire Group (consulting) (November 2004–August 2005) Chief Executive Officer, NewRiver, Inc. (electronic delivery of compliance documents) (September 1998–October 2004) |
| |
RICHARD M. HISEY, CFA c/o AARP Financial Incorporated Two Highwood Drive, 2nd Floor Tewksbury MA 01876 Age: 47 Treasurer | | Chief Investment Officer, AARP Financial (April 2006–present) Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer, Cole Management, Incorporated (venture capital firm) (2005–2006) Senior Vice President, MFS Investment Management and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, MFS Group of Mutual Funds (2002–2005) Senior Vice President, The Bank of New York (2000–2002) various positions, Lexington Global Asset Managers, Inc. (1986–2000) |
About the Funds’ Board of Trustees and Officers AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 35
| | |
LEILANI SANDERS HALL, CFA 650 F Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 Age: 54 Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer | | Chief Compliance Officer, AARP Financial (November 2005–present) Senior Special Adviser and examiner, U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (October 2003–September 2005) Self-Employed Consultant (January 2002–October 2003) Senior Vice President, The Pioneer Group, Inc. (investment management) (March 1995–January 2002) |
| |
NANCY M. SMITH 650 F Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 Age: 50 Secretary | | Vice President, Investment Services, AARP Financial (October 2005–present) Vice President, Investment Services, AARP Services, Inc. (August 2005–October 2005) Self-Employed Consultant (February 2002–July 2005) Vice President Web Content, FOLIOfn (financial services, broker-dealer) (October 1999–February 2002) |
| |
JULIE TEDESCO State Street Bank and Trust Company 2 Avenue de Lafayette Boston, MA 02111 Age: 48 Assistant Secretary | | Vice President and Senior Counsel of State Street Bank and Trust Company (2000–present) Counsel of First Data Investor Services Group, Inc., (1994–2000) |
| |
THRESA DEWAR State Street Bank and Trust Company 2 Avenue de Lafayette Boston, MA 02111 Age: 51 Assistant Treasurer | | Vice President—Portfolio Administration of State Street Bank and Trust Company (1997–present) |
Additional information about AARP Funds’ trustees is provided in the Statement of Additional Information and is available without charge, upon request, by calling (800) 958-6457.
36 AARP FUNDS 2006 ANNUAL REPORT About the Funds’ Board of Trustees and Officers
How to Contact Us
Telephone
Call (800) 958-6457 weekdays from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm Eastern time, to speak directly with a courteous, knowledgeable representative. The following prompt choices are available when you dial the number above:
• | | Financial Center investment counselors are available to answer investment questions relating to the AARP Funds. |
• | | Shareholder Services representatives can handle any account-related questions or transactions. |
• | | Automated Response System is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week to handle a wide range of account functions (as shown below). |
Financial Center investment counselors
• | | Speak with specially trained representatives to help you identify your goals, determine if you’re on track financially for retirement and decide if an AARP Fund is right for you. |
Shareholder Services representatives or our 24-hour Automated Response System
• | | Receive general account information and service from our Shareholder Services representatives |
• | | Initiate an electronic transfer to buy or sell shares |
• | | Order duplicate statements |
• | | Check your account balance or share prices |
• | | Change your address of record |
(not available via the Automated Response System)
Mail
AARP Funds
P.O. Box 8035
Boston, MA 02266-8035
Overnight delivery
AARP Funds
c/o BFDS
66 Brooks Drive
Braintree, MA 02184
• | | Request to buy, sell or exchange shares in writing |
• | | Change the name on your account |
• | | Add a seasonal mailing address |
• | | Add banking information to your account |
• | | Add or change an Automatic Investment Program |
• | | Add or change payroll deduction |
Website
www.aarpfunds.com
• | | Get a prospectus or fund report |
• | | Buy, sell or exchange shares |
• | | View your account balance and share price |
• | | Change your mailing address |
• | | Order duplicate statements or copies of your tax forms |
• | | Get forms to accomplish a variety of tasks |
How to Contact Us 37
AARP Funds
P.O. Box 8035
Boston, MA 02266-8035
(800) 958-6457
www.aarpfunds.com
©2006 AARP Funds
| | |
| | ARP000187 06/30/2007 ARP-AR-001-0806 |
Item 2: Code of Ethics.
(a) | AARP Funds (the “Registrant”) has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Registrant’s principal executive officer and senior financial officers, including the principal financial officer, controller or principal accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these persons are employed by the Registrant or a third party. |
(b) | No disclosures are required by this Item 2(b). |
(c) | There have been no amendments to the Registrant’s Code of Ethics since its adoption during the reporting period for Form N-CSR. |
(d) | There have been no waivers granted by the Registrant to individuals covered by the Registrant’s Code of Ethics during the reporting period for Form N-CSR. |
(f) | A copy of the Registrant’s Code of Ethics is attached as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. |
Item 3: Audit Committee Financial Expert.
| | | | |
(a) | | (1) | | The Board of Trustees of the Registrant has determined that the Registrant has one member serving on the Registrant’s Audit Committee that possesses the attributes identified in Instruction 2(b) of Item 3 to Form N-CSR to qualify as “audit committee financial expert.” |
| | |
| | (2) | | For the reporting period, the name of the audit committee financial expert was Lynn Turner. Mr. Turner was deemed to be “independent” as that term is defined in Item 3(a)(2) of Form N-CSR. |
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a) | Audit Fees – The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm for the audit of the Registrant’s annual financial statements or services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the fiscal period from the commencement of operations on January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006 were $49,500. |
(b) | Audit-Related Fees – The Registrant was not billed any fees by the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal period from the commencement of operations on January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006 for assurance and related services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm to the registrant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item 4. |
During the fiscal period from the commencement of operations on January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006, no fees for assurance and related services that relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant were billed by the independent registered public accounting firm to the Registrant’s investment adviser or any other entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant.
(c) | Tax Fees – The Registrant was not billed any fees by the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal period from the commencement of operations on January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006 for tax compliance, tax advice, tax planning and tax return preparation for the fiscal period from the commencement of operations on January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006. |
During the fiscal period from the commencement of operations on January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006, no fees for tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning services that relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant were billed by the independent registered public accounting firm to the Registrant’s investment adviser or any other entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant.
(d) | All Other Fees – The aggregate fees billed for other professional services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal period from the commencement of operations on January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006 were $2,400. This was for a consent to the reference of the independent registered public accounting firm in the Statement of Additional Information for a new series of the Registrant, the AARP Money Market Fund. |
During the fiscal period from the commencement of operations on January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006, no fees for other services that relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant were billed by the independent registered public accounting firm to the Registrant’s investment adviser or any other entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant.
(e) | Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures |
It is the general policy of the Audit Committee not to approve non-audit services. In considering whether to approve non-audit services, the Audit Committee will consider the following:
| (a) | whether the service is being performed principally for the Audit Committee; |
| (b) | the effects of the service, if any, on audit effectiveness or on the quality and timeliness of the Funds financial reporting process; |
| (c) | whether the service would be performed by specialists (e.g., technology specialists) who ordinarily also provide recurring audit support; |
| (d) | whether the service would be performed by audit personnel and, if so, whether it will enhance their knowledge of the Funds business and operations; |
| (e) | whether the role of those performing the service would be inconsistent with the Auditor’s role (e.g., a role where neutrality, impartiality and auditor skepticism are likely to be subverted); |
| (f) | whether the audit firm’s personnel would be assuming a management role or creating a mutuality of interest with management; |
| (g) | whether the auditors, in effect, would be auditing their own numbers; |
| (h) | whether the project must be started and completed very quickly and therefore is not a longer term relationship; |
| (i) | whether the audit firm has unique service expertise in the service that cannot be obtained from another service provider; and |
| (j) | the size of the fee(s) for the non-audit service(s). |
(e)(2) | Percentage of Services. |
One hundred percent of the services described in each of paragraphs (b) through (d) of this Item were approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f) | No disclosures are required by this Item 4(f). |
(g) | The independent registered public accounting firm did not bill the Registrant for any other non-audit services for the fiscal period from the commencement of operations on January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006 for the Registrant other than as disclosed above. |
(h) | No disclosures are required by this Item 4(h). |
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments.
Schedule of Investments is included as a part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The Board of Trustees has adopted procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Board. There have been no amendments to such procedures since their adoption during the reporting period for Form N-CSR.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) | The Registrant’s principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded that the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c)) are effective, as of a |
| date within 90 days of the filing date of this Form N-CSR based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(b)) and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or 240.15d-15(b)). |
(b) | There were no changes in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 12. Exhibits.
| | |
(a)(1) | | Code of Ethics is attached hereto. |
| |
(a)(2) | | The certifications required by Rule 30a-2(a) of the 1940 Act are attached hereto. (Ex-99.CERT) |
| |
(a)(3) | | Not applicable. |
| |
(b) | | The certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) of the 1940 Act and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are attached hereto.(Ex-99.906CERT) |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
AARP FUNDS |
| |
By: | | /s/ Larry C. Renfro |
| | Larry C. Renfro |
| | President (principal executive officer) of AARP Funds |
| |
Date: | | August 23, 2006 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | |
By: | | /s/ Larry C. Renfro |
| | Larry C. Renfro |
| | President (principal executive officer) of AARP Funds |
| |
Date: | | August 23, 2006 |
| |
By: | | /s/ Richard M. Hisey |
| | Richard M. Hisey |
| | Treasurer (principal financial officer) of AARP Funds |
| |
Date: | | August 23, 2006 |