UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT
OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-22649
iShares U.S. ETF Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
c/o: State Street Bank and Trust Company
100 Summer Street, 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02110
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
The Corporation Trust Company
1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE 19801
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (415) 670-2000
Date of fiscal year end: July 31, 2018
Date of reporting period: July 31, 2018
Item 1. | Reports to Stockholders. |
Copies of the annual reports transmitted to shareholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 are attached.
JULY 31, 2018
| | |
2018 ANNUAL REPORT | | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a1b2/6a1b2fea9aa02cc754d94e7d9f7c78e2a5d85f32" alt="LOGO" |
iShares U.S. ETF Trust
iShares Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF | IECS | Cboe BZX
iShares Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF | IEDI | Cboe BZX
iShares Evolved U.S. Financials ETF | IEFN | Cboe BZX
iShares Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF | IEHS | Cboe BZX
iShares Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF | IEIH | Cboe BZX
iShares Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment ETF | IEME | Cboe BZX
iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF | IETC | Cboe BZX
Table of Contents
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
Market Overview
iShares U.S. ETF Trust
Domestic Market Overview
U.S. stocks advanced for the period from March 21, 2018, through July 31, 2018 (“reporting period”). The S&P Total Market Index™, a broad measure of U.S. equity market performance, returned 4.51% for the reporting period.
The most significant factor behind the U.S. equity market’s advance for the reporting period was an improving U.S. economy. After slowing somewhat in late 2017 and early 2018, the economy posted its fastest quarterly growth rate in four years in the second quarter of 2018. Key economic drivers included meaningful increases in consumer spending and manufacturing activity, as well as the lowest unemployment rate since April 2000.
Federal tax reform legislation also benefited stock prices. Passed in December 2017, the legislation included a steep reduction in corporate tax rates and a modest decrease in individual tax rates. Tax reform also incentivized companies to repatriate cash held outside of the U.S., raising expectations for capital spending, acquisitions, dividends, and stock repurchases by U.S. companies.
The combination of a stronger economy and lower corporate taxes contributed to record corporate profit growth across virtually all sectors of the U.S. stock market. Deregulation in selected segments of the economy and a recovery in commodities prices also benefited corporate earnings.
The improving economic environment also led to higher inflation. By the end of the reporting period, the year-over-year inflation rate had reached its highest level in more than six years. A faster inflation rate prompted the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank (“Fed”) to raise short-term interest rates twice in the first half of 2018, lifting its short-term interest rate target to its highest level in a decade. Rising inflation also resulted in broadly higher interest rates, which can lead to higher borrowing costs for companies, consumers, and the government.
Although the U.S. equity market advanced overall for the reporting period, the market faced several bouts of meaningful volatility, much of which was driven by geopolitical developments. In addition to ongoing turmoil in North Korea and the Middle East, the most significant geopolitical issue was a burgeoning trade conflict between the U.S. and several of its international trading partners. In March 2018, the U.S. government announced plans to implement tariffs on steel, aluminum, and selected Chinese products. China responded with tariffs on certain U.S. agricultural products, leading to an escalating series of tariff threats between the two countries. Meanwhile, the steel and aluminum tariffs led to trade clashes between the U.S. and Europe, Canada, and Mexico. The ensuing volatility in the U.S. stock market reflected fears of a broad trade war and corresponding economic disruption.
For the reporting period, small-capitalization stocks outperformed mid- and large-capitalization equities, reflecting an investor shift toward smaller companies with greater exposure to the U.S. economy. Signs of slowing growth in other regions of the globe, improving domestic economic activity, and the potential negative impact of a trade war on large multinational companies provided support for small-capitalization stocks.
Among large- and small-capitalization stocks, growth stocks outpaced value-oriented equities for the reporting period. In contrast, value stocks outperformed growth among mid-capitalization stocks. Overall, growth-oriented information technology companies generally benefited from an ongoing shift toward e-commerce, digital advertising, cloud computing, mobile devices, and streaming services.
| | |
M A R K E T O V E R V I E W | | 5 |
| | |
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2018 | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF |
Investment Objective
The iShares Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF (the “Fund”) seeks to provide access to U.S. companies with consumer staples exposure, as classified using a proprietary classification system. The Fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that does not seek to replicate the performance of a specified index.
Performance
| | |
| | Cumulative Total Returns |
| | Since |
| | Inception |
Fund NAV | | 2.34% |
Fund Market | | 2.38 |
S&P Total Market IndexTM | | 4.51 |
For the fiscal period ended 7/31/18, the Fund did not have six months of performance and therefore line graphs are not presented.
The inception date of the Fund was 3/21/18. The first day of secondary market trading was 3/23/18.
The S&P Total Market IndexTM is an unmanaged index designed to track the broad equity market, including large-, mid-, small-, and micro-cap stocks.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Performance results do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or on the redemption or sale of fund shares. See “About Fund Performance” on page 20 for more information.
Expense Example
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | | Hypothetical 5% Return | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Beginning Account Value (03/21/18)(a) | | Ending Account Value (07/31/18) | | | Expenses Paid During the Period (b) | | | Beginning Account Value (02/01/18) | | | Ending Account Value (07/31/18) | | | Expenses Paid During the Period (b) | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | |
$ 1,000.00 | | $ | 1,023.40 | | | $ | 0.66 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,023.90 | | | $ | 0.90 | | | | 0.18 | % |
| (a) | The beginning of the period (commencement of operations) is March 21, 2018. |
| (b) | Expenses are calculated using the Fund’s annualized expense ratio (as disclosed in the table), multiplied by the average account value for the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period (132 days for actual and 181 days for hypothetical expenses) and divided by the number of days in the year (365 days). See “Shareholder Expenses” on page 20 for more information. |
Portfolio Management Commentary
Consumer staples stocks rose, as U.S. economic growth and consumer spending strengthened during the abbreviated reporting period. However, gains were limited by rising interest rates, which reduced the appeal of higher-yielding staples stocks relative to bonds. Other challenges included competition from online retailers and increased pricing pressures.
In that environment, the Fund rose but underperformed the broader market, as represented by the S&P Total Market Index, for the reporting period. Performance in the staples sector is perhaps best represented by stocks in the beverages industry, such as the Coca-Cola Co. and PepsiCo Inc., which managed modest gains. These companies faced challenges from evolving consumer preferences for healthier food and drinks, particularly as it related to sugar in carbonated drinks. Nevertheless, beverage companies have found success reducing sugar content, diversifying into healthier drinks, and experimenting with new products and packaging. Food products and household products companies, such as Kellogg Co. and the Procter & Gamble Co., faced similar challenges. Such companies generally posted positive performance, though they faced pressure on pricing, changing consumer tastes, and distribution.
On the downside, tobacco companies such as Philip Morris International Inc. declined during the reporting period. Concerns about the slow adoption of smokeless tobacco products, particularly internationally and among the sizable proportion of the smoking population older than 50, weighed on performance. Investors also appeared to be concerned about uneven progress for smokeless tobacco products clearing regulatory hurdles around the globe.
The Fund’s evolved investment process looks beyond traditional sector definitions by applying machine learning and natural language processing to group individual companies with related business activity. During the reporting period, the evolved process identified several consumer staples companies that traditionally have been categorized in sectors other than consumer staples. For example, the process grouped Monsanto Co., which has traditionally been categorized in the materials sector and associated with agricultural chemicals, in the staples sector. During the reporting period, Monsanto performed well and was acquired by a German multinational company at a premium to its stock price.
| | |
6 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2018 | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF |
Portfolio Information
ALLOCATION BY SECTOR
| | |
Sector | | Percent of Total Investments(a) |
Food | | 28.3% |
Beverages | | 27.8 |
Agriculture | | 13.5 |
Retail | | 11.3 |
Cosmetics & Personal Care | | 9.6 |
Household Products & Wares | | 2.3 |
Packaging & Containers | | 1.7 |
Pharmaceuticals | | 1.4 |
Chemicals | | 1.1 |
Other (each representing less than 1%) | | 3.0 |
TEN LARGEST HOLDINGS
| | |
Security | | Percent of Total Investments(a) |
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | | 10.6% |
PepsiCo Inc. | | 9.3 |
Philip Morris International Inc. | | 6.5 |
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | | 6.0 |
Mondelez International Inc., Class A | | 5.4 |
Altria Group Inc. | | 5.0 |
McDonald’s Corp. | | 4.1 |
Kraft Heinz Co. (The) | | 4.0 |
Starbucks Corp. | | 3.3 |
Colgate-Palmolive Co. | | 3.0 |
(a) | Excludes money market funds. | |
| | |
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2018 | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF |
Investment Objective
The iShares Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF (the “Fund”) seeks to provide access to U.S. companies with discretionary spending exposure, as classified using a proprietary classification system. The Fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that does not seek to replicate the performance of a specified index.
Performance
| | |
| | Cumulative Total Returns |
| | Since |
| | Inception |
Fund NAV | | 7.96% |
Fund Market | | 7.92 |
S&P Total Market IndexTM | | 4.51 |
For the fiscal period ended 7/31/18, the Fund did not have six months of performance and therefore line graphs are not presented.
The inception date of the Fund was 3/21/18. The first day of secondary market trading was 3/23/18.
The S&P Total Market IndexTM is an unmanaged index designed to track the broad equity market, including large-, mid-, small-, and micro-cap stocks.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Performance results do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or on the redemption or sale of fund shares. See “About Fund Performance” on page 20 for more information.
Expense Example
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | | Hypothetical 5% Return | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Beginning Account Value (03/21/18)(a) | | Ending Account Value (07/31/18) | | | Expenses Paid During the Period (b) | | | Beginning Account Value (02/01/18) | | | Ending Account Value (07/31/18) | | | Expenses Paid During the Period (b) | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | |
$ 1,000.00 | | $ | 1,079.60 | | | $ | 0.68 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,023.90 | | | $ | 0.90 | | | | 0.18 | % |
| (a) | The beginning of the period (commencement of operations) is March 21, 2018. |
| (b) | Expenses are calculated using the Fund’s annualized expense ratio (as disclosed in the table), multiplied by the average account value for the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period (132 days for actual and 181 days for hypothetical expenses) and divided by the number of days in the year (365 days). See “Shareholder Expenses” on page 20 for more information. |
Portfolio Management Commentary
Stocks tied to discretionary spending benefited from a strengthening economy, as U.S. economic growth was the fastest in almost four years in the second quarter of 2018. Consumer spending, which accounts for more than two-thirds of the economy, drove economic growth as personal spending rose 0.4% in June.
The Fund outperformed the broader market, as represented by the S&P Total Market Index, for the abbreviated reporting period. While improving economic conditions led to more consumer spending, technological changes also affected performance of retail-centered stocks. For example, the ongoing “retail apocalypse” (the evolution away from traditional brick-and-mortar retailers to online shopping) is perhaps most well reflected in the strong advance of online retail giant Amazon.com Inc. Other solid performers included companies addressing specific markets segments, like the Home Depot Inc., which benefited from the ongoing recovery in the housing market. Similarly, select companies with globally recognized brands, such as Nike Inc., also performed well. Finally, off-price retailers were some of the leading performers. This included the TJX Companies Inc., the parent company for discount retailers T.J .Maxx and Marshalls, among others.
On the downside, fast-casual restaurants such as Starbucks Corp. declined during the reporting period. Concerns about intense price competition, as well as changing customer tastes and health concerns, led to weakness in some restaurant chains. Slower-than-expected growth in the U.S. and in international markets such as China, also weighed on a number of restaurant stocks.
The Fund’s evolved investment process looks beyond traditional sector definitions by applying machine learning and natural language processing to group individual companies with related business activity. During the reporting period, the evolved process identified several consumer discretionary companies with similar exposure to others in discretionary spending that traditionally have been categorized in other sectors. For example, the process grouped Costco Wholesale Corp., which has traditionally been categorized in the food and staples retail industry, with the discretionary spending sector. During the reporting period, Costco performed well, benefiting from the strength in consumer spending as its growing digital business and membership model allowed it to succeed in a competitive retail landscape.
| | |
8 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2018 | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF |
Portfolio Information
ALLOCATION BY SECTOR
| | |
Sector | | Percent of Total Investments(a) |
Retail | | 56.4% |
Internet | | 15.0 |
Apparel | | 7.8 |
Cosmetics & Personal Care | | 5.0 |
Lodging | | 3.6 |
Food | | 2.2 |
Real Estate Investment Trusts | | 1.4 |
Distribution & Wholesale | | 1.3 |
Commercial Services | | 1.3 |
Entertainment | | 1.0 |
Other (each representing less than 1%) | | 5.0 |
TEN LARGEST HOLDINGS
| | |
Security | | Percent of Total Investments(a) |
Amazon. com Inc. | | 11.5% |
Home Depot Inc. (The) | | 9.5 |
Walmart Inc. | | 5.8 |
Costco Wholesale Corp. | | 4.2 |
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | | 4.0 |
McDonald’s Corp. | | 3.8 |
NIKE Inc., Class B | | 3.8 |
TJX Companies Inc. (The) | | 3.1 |
Lowe’s Companies Inc. | | 2.9 |
Target Corp. | | 2.3 |
(a) | Excludes money market funds. | |
| | |
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2018 | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Financials ETF |
Investment Objective
The iShares Evolved U.S. Financials ETF (the “Fund”) seeks to provide access to U.S. companies with financials exposure, as classified using a proprietary classification system. The Fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that does not seek to replicate the performance of a specified index.
Performance
| | |
| | Cumulative Total Returns |
| | Since |
| | Inception |
Fund NAV | | (1.40)% |
Fund Market | | (1.44) |
S&P Total Market IndexTM | | 4.51 |
For the fiscal period ended 7/31/18, the Fund did not have six months of performance and therefore line graphs are not presented.
The inception date of the Fund was 3/21/18. The first day of secondary market trading was 3/23/18.
The Fund NAV total return presented in the table for the since inception period differs from the same period return disclosed in the financial highlights. The total return in the financial highlights is calculated in the same manner but differs due to certain adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The S&P Total Market IndexTM is an unmanaged index designed to track the broad equity market, including large-, mid-, small-, and micro-cap stocks.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Performance results do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or on the redemption or sale of fund shares. See “About Fund Performance” on page 20 for more information.
Expense Example
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | | Hypothetical 5% Return | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Beginning Account Value (03/21/18)(a) | | Ending Account Value (07/31/18) | | | Expenses Paid During the Period (b) | | | Beginning Account Value (02/01/18) | | | Ending Account Value (07/31/18) | | | Expenses Paid During the Period (b) | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | |
$ 1,000.00 | | $ | 988.90 | | | $ | 0.65 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,023.90 | | | $ | 0.90 | | | | 0.18 | % |
| (a) | The beginning of the period (commencement of operations) is March 21, 2018. |
| (b) | Expenses are calculated using the Fund’s annualized expense ratio (as disclosed in the table), multiplied by the average account value for the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period (132 days for actual and 181 days for hypothetical expenses) and divided by the number of days in the year (365 days). See “Shareholder Expenses” on page 20 for more information. |
Portfolio Management Commentary
Financials stocks declined during the abbreviated reporting period, even as U.S. economic growth was the fastest in almost four years in the second quarter of 2018. Nevertheless, performance of financials stocks was muted amid concerns about a flattening yield curve and potential disruption to economic activity from a brewing trade war. A flatter yield curve means the difference in yield between short- and long-term securities declines, negatively affecting bank profitability. Investors were also concerned that these yield curve changes signaled slower growth ahead.
In that environment, the Fund declined and underperformed the broader market, as represented by the S&P Total Market Index, for the reporting period. Diversified banks were symptomatic of the general tension around the performance of financials stocks. Companies such as JPMorgan Chase &Co. and Bank of America Corp. posted negative returns in the
Fund, while others, such as Wells Fargo & Co., rose. In addition to facing concerns about a possible slowdown in growth and changes in the shape of the yield curve, these large banks were subject to tests of their financial health by the Fed. While the outcomes of these “stress tests” were generally positive, investors were disappointed that a number of leading banks were forced to scale back or cancel planned increases in dividend payouts. It was a similar story for asset managers and custody banks, such as State Street Corp., and investment bankers and brokerages, including Morgan Stanley and the Goldman Sachs Group Inc., which also faced capital controls from Fed regulators.
The Fund’s evolved investment process looks beyond traditional sector definitions by applying machine learning and natural language processing to group individual companies with related business activity. During the reporting period, the evolved process identified several financial companies that have traditionally been categorized in other sectors. For example, the process grouped Mastercard Inc., which has traditionally been categorized in the software and services industry, in the financials sector. Mastercard performed well, benefiting from strong consumer spending and purchases, as well as the shift away from cash and check to digital payments.
| | |
10 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2018 | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Financials ETF |
Portfolio Information
ALLOCATION BY SECTOR
| | |
Sector | | Percent of Total Investments(a) |
Banks | | 47.1% |
Insurance | | 21.4 |
Diversified Financial Services | | 15.8 |
Commercial Services | | 4.5 |
Health Care - Services | | 3.4 |
Manufacturing | | 2.1 |
Savings & Loans | | 1.7 |
Software | | 1.6 |
Other (each representing less than 1%) | | 2.4 |
TEN LARGEST HOLDINGS
| | |
Security | | Percent of Total Investments(a) |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | 4.8% |
Bank of America Corp. | | 4.8 |
Wells Fargo & Co. | | 4.5 |
U. S. Bancorp | | 3.3 |
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (The) | | 2.9 |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Class B | | 2.5 |
Morgan Stanley | | 2.3 |
General Electric Co. | | 2.1 |
American Express Co. | | 2.1 |
Charles Schwab Corp. (The) | | 2.0 |
(a) | Excludes money market funds. | |
| | |
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2018 | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF |
Investment Objective
The iShares Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF (the “Fund”) seeks to provide access to U.S. companies with healthcare staples exposure, as classified using a proprietary classification system. The Fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that does not seek to replicate the performance of a specified index.
Performance
| | |
| | Cumulative Total Returns |
| | Since |
| | Inception |
Fund NAV | | 10.77% |
Fund Market | | 10.69 |
S&P Total Market IndexTM | | 4.51 |
For the fiscal period ended 7/31/18, the Fund did not have six months of performance and therefore line graphs are not presented.
The inception date of the Fund was 3/21/18. The first day of secondary market trading was 3/23/18.
The S&P Total Market IndexTM is an unmanaged index designed to track the broad equity market, including large-, mid-, small-, and micro-cap stocks.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Performance results do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or on the redemption or sale of fund shares. See “About Fund Performance” on page 20 for more information.
Expense Example
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | | Hypothetical 5% Return | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Beginning Account Value (03/21/18)(a) | | Ending Account Value (07/31/18) | | | Expenses Paid During the Period (b) | | | Beginning Account Value (02/01/18) | | | Ending Account Value (07/31/18) | | | Expenses Paid During the Period (b) | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | |
$ 1,000.00 | | $ | 1,107.70 | | | $ | 0.69 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,023.90 | | | $ | 0.90 | | | | 0.18 | % |
| (a) | The beginning of the period (commencement of operations) is March 21, 2018. |
| (b) | Expenses are calculated using the Fund’s annualized expense ratio (as disclosed in the table), multiplied by the average account value for the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period (132 days for actual and 181 days for hypothetical expenses) and divided by the number of days in the year (365 days). See “Shareholder Expenses” on page 20 for more information. |
Portfolio Management Commentary
U.S. healthcare staples stocks continued to benefit from an aging population, which has led to increased demand for healthcare products and services. Since the first Baby Boomers reached age 65 in early 2011, about 10,000 people per day have turned 65 in the U.S., driving overall spending on healthcare higher.
The Fund outperformed the broader market, as represented by the S&P Total Market Index, for the abbreviated reporting period. The aging population drove strong growth in the Medicare Advantage plans offered by private health insurance companies, which helped support managed care stocks such as UnitedHealth Group Inc. Healthcare equipment companies such as Boston Scientific Corp. and Intuitive Surgical Inc. were also solid performers, benefiting from new technological developments and the delay of a federal excise tax on medical devices. Other noteworthy performers among healthcare staples stocks included life sciences companies such as Illumina Inc. and healthcare facilities operators such as HCA Healthcare Inc. Many life sciences stocks generated stronger-than-expected earnings during the reporting period. Meanwhile, healthcare facilities companies benefited from solid operational performance and a lower corporate tax rate resulting from the 2017 federal tax reform legislation.
On the downside, healthcare distributors such as Cardinal Health Inc. declined during the reporting period. Price reductions in generic drugs led to narrowing profit margins, and concerns about new competitors from outside the industry weighed on the stock prices of healthcare distributors.
The Fund’s evolved investment process looks beyond traditional sector definitions by applying machine learning and natural language processing to group individual companies with related business activity. More specifically, the evolved investment process identified companies with healthcare staples businesses that have traditionally been categorized into other sectors. For example, drug retailers have traditionally been classified as consumer staples stocks, yet have elements in common with other traditionally classified healthcare companies. In addition, many drug retailers have expanded into other healthcare segments, including pharmacy benefits management and health insurance. Drug retailers advanced for the reporting period, as increased prescription volumes drove revenue and earnings growth.
| | |
12 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2018 | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF |
Portfolio Information
ALLOCATION BY SECTOR
| | |
Sector | | Percent of Total Investments(a) |
Health Care - Services | | 39.4% |
Health Care - Products | | 37.2 |
Pharmaceuticals | | 9.2 |
Biotechnology | | 3.5 |
Real Estate Investment Trusts | | 2.8 |
Retail | | 1.8 |
Software | | 1.8 |
Electronics | | 1.4 |
Commercial Services | | 1.2 |
Aerospace & Defense | | 1.0 |
Other (each representing less than 1%) | | 0.7 |
TEN LARGEST HOLDINGS
| | |
Security | | Percent of Total Investments(a) |
UnitedHealth Group Inc. | | 15.2% |
Abbott Laboratories | | 5.1 |
CVS Health Corp. | | 3.8 |
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | | 3.7 |
Anthem Inc. | | 3.7 |
Intuitive Surgical Inc. | | 3.5 |
Aetna Inc. | | 3.4 |
Becton Dickinson and Co. | | 3.2 |
Humana Inc. | | 2.9 |
HCA Healthcare Inc. | | 2.7 |
(a) | Excludes money market funds. | |
| | |
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2018 | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF |
Investment Objective
The iShares Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF (the “Fund”) seeks to provide access to U.S. companies with innovative healthcare exposure, as classified using a proprietary classification system. The Fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that does not seek to replicate the performance of a specified index.
Performance
| | |
| | Cumulative Total Returns |
| | Since |
| | Inception |
Fund NAV | | 4.62% |
Fund Market | | 4.58 |
S&P Total Market IndexTM | | 4.51 |
For the fiscal period ended 7/31/18, the Fund did not have six months of performance and therefore line graphs are not presented.
The inception date of the Fund was 3/21/18. The first day of secondary market trading was 3/23/18.
The S&P Total Market IndexTM is an unmanaged index designed to track the broad equity market, including large-, mid-, small-, and micro-cap stocks.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Performance results do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or on the redemption or sale of fund shares. See “About Fund Performance” on page 20 for more information.
Expense Example
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | | Hypothetical 5% Return | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Beginning Account Value (03/21/18)(a) | | Ending Account Value (07/31/18) | | | Expenses Paid During the Period (b) | | | Beginning Account Value (02/01/18) | | | Ending Account Value (07/31/18) | | | Expenses Paid During the Period (b) | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | |
$ 1,000.00 | | $ | 1,046.20 | | | $ | 0.67 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,023.90 | | | $ | 0.90 | | | | 0.18 | % |
| (a) | The beginning of the period (commencement of operations) is March 21, 2018. |
| (b) | Expenses are calculated using the Fund’s annualized expense ratio (as disclosed in the table), multiplied by the average account value for the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period (132 days for actual and 181 days for hypothetical expenses) and divided by the number of days in the year (365 days). See “Shareholder Expenses” on page 20 for more information. |
Portfolio Management Commentary
U.S. innovative healthcare stocks continued to benefit from an aging population, which has led to increased demand for healthcare products and services. Since the first Baby Boomers reached age 65 in early 2011, about 10,000 people per day have turned 65 in the U.S., driving overall spending on healthcare higher. New technological developments — including robotics, miniaturization, and AI-related analytical tools — have been a source of both innovation and growth for healthcare-related companies.
The Fund slightly outperformed the broader market, as represented by the S&P Total Market Index, for the abbreviated reporting period. The Fund’s evolved investment process looks beyond traditional sector definitions by applying machine learning and natural language processing to group individual companies with related business activity. As of the end of the reporting period, the Fund’s portfolio consisted primarily of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, but also included companies in diverse industries such as medical devices, electronic equipment, and semiconductor manufacturing.
Pharmaceutical stocks such as Eli Lilly & Co., Merck & Co. Inc., and Pfizer Inc. benefited from strong demand for medications from an aging population, including drugs that treat diabetes and various forms of cancer, as well as vaccines to protect the elderly from health problems such as pneumonia and meningitis. In addition, a robust new product development pipeline, with a number of potential blockbuster medications in late-stage clinical trials, helped support pharmaceutical stocks. Biotechnology companies such as Biogen Inc. were also solid performers, benefiting from several new product launches and an increase in mergers and acquisitions. Healthcare equipment makers also advanced, supported by the development of innovative new technologies and the delay of a federal excise tax on medical devices.
On the downside, several pharmaceutical and biotechnology stocks declined meaningfully during the reporting period. For example, biotechnology company AbbVie Inc. weakened amid concerns about potential regulatory changes for biosimilars, or generic biopharmaceuticals, and drug rebates.
| | |
14 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2018 | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF |
Portfolio Information
ALLOCATION BY SECTOR
| | |
Sector | | Percent of Total Investments(a) |
Pharmaceuticals | | 47.7% |
Biotechnology | | 44.2 |
Health Care - Products | | 7.0 |
Other (each representing less than 1%) | | 1.1 |
TEN LARGEST HOLDINGS
| | |
Security | | Percent of Total Investments(a) |
Johnson & Johnson | | 9.6% |
Pfizer Inc. | | 6.8 |
Merck & Co. Inc. | | 5.9 |
Eli Lilly & Co. | | 5.3 |
Amgen Inc. | | 5.2 |
Biogen Inc. | | 4.9 |
Gilead Sciences Inc. | | 4.9 |
Celgene Corp. | | 4.8 |
AbbVie Inc. | | 4.8 |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | | 4.4 |
(a) | Excludes money market funds. | |
| | |
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2018 | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment ETF |
| | |
Investment Objective
The iShares Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment ETF (the “Fund”) seeks to provide access to U.S. companies with media and entertainment exposure, as classified using a proprietary classification system. The Fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that does not seek to replicate the performance of a specified index.
Performance
| | |
| | Cumulative Total Returns |
| | Since |
| | Inception |
Fund NAV | | 5.54% |
Fund Market | | 5.54 |
S&P Total Market IndexTM | | 4.51 |
For the fiscal period ended 7/31/18, the Fund did not have six months of performance and therefore line graphs are not presented.
The inception date of the Fund was 3/21/18. The first day of secondary market trading was 3/23/18.
The S&P Total Market IndexTM is an unmanaged index designed to track the broad equity market, including large-, mid-, small-, and micro-cap stocks.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Performance results do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or on the redemption or sale of fund shares. See “About Fund Performance” on page 20 for more information.
Expense Example
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | | Hypothetical 5% Return | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Beginning Account Value (03/21/18)(a) | | Ending Account Value (07/31/18) | | | Expenses Paid During the Period (b) | | | Beginning Account Value (02/01/18) | | | Ending Account Value (07/31/18) | | | Expenses Paid During the Period (b) | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | |
$ 1,000.00 | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 0.65 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,023.90 | | | $ | 0.90 | | | | 0.18 | % |
| (a) | The beginning of the period (commencement of operations) is March 21, 2018. |
| (b) | Expenses are calculated using the Fund’s annualized expense ratio (as disclosed in the table), multiplied by the average account value for the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period (132 days for actual and 181 days for hypothetical expenses) and divided by the number of days in the year (365 days). See “Shareholder Expenses” on page 20 for more information. |
Portfolio Management Commentary
U.S. media and entertainment stocks advanced amid a rapidly changing landscape. Historically, studios produced content, such as television shows and movies, which was sold to distributors, such as broadcast networks and movie theaters. The distributors would then make the content available to consumers. Today, there are a wider variety of distribution platforms, and many distribution companies are creating and delivering their own content. A spate of recent mergers and acquisitions have further blurred the lines between content providers and distributors, and a number of new players — from technology to telecommunications companies — are establishing a presence in the industry.
The Fund outperformed the broader market, as represented by the S&P Total Market Index, for the reporting period. Merger activity and strong film franchises helped support movie producers such as Twenty-First Century Fox Inc. and the Walt Disney Co. Broadcast network companies such as Discovery Inc. also benefited from industry consolidation, as well as from strong growth in licensing fees for streaming services. Entertainment companies like World Wrestling Entertainment Inc. were strong performers amid new licensing deals with a variety of content distributors.
On the downside, cable and satellite companies such as DISH Network Corp. declined. Increased competition and a continuation of the “cord-cutting”— consumers shifting away from traditional subscription-based cable television to streaming and other content delivery systems — weighed on cable and satellite stocks.
The Fund’s evolved investment process looks beyond traditional sector definitions by applying machine learning and natural language processing to group individual companies with related business activity. More specifically, the evolved investment process identified several companies with media and entertainment businesses that have traditionally been categorized into other sectors. For example, Netflix Inc. has traditionally been considered an internet and direct marketing company in the retail industry. However, Netflix has become a significant content developer and distributor, competing directly with traditional media and entertainment companies. Netflix advanced for the reporting period as strong subscriber additions drove accelerating revenue growth and profitability.
| | |
16 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2018 | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment ETF |
| | |
Portfolio Information
| | |
ALLOCATION BY SECTOR |
Sector | | Percent of Total Investments(a) |
Media | | 65.6% |
Software | | 11.7 |
Internet | | 7.7 |
Entertainment | | 7.6 |
Toys, Games & Hobbies | | 3.3 |
Telecommunications | | 2.5 |
Other (each representing less than 1%) | | 1.6 |
| | |
TEN LARGEST HOLDINGS |
Security | | Percent of Total Investments(a) |
Walt Disney Co. (The) | | 7.0% |
Twenty-First Century Fox Inc., Class B | | 6.0 |
Twenty-First Century Fox Inc., Class A | | 6.0 |
Comcast Corp., Class A | | 5.8 |
Netflix Inc. | | 5.2 |
CBS Corp., Class B | | 5.1 |
Activision Blizzard Inc. | | 5.0 |
Electronic Arts Inc. | | 4.6 |
Charter Communications Inc., Class A | | 4.5 |
Viacom Inc., Class B | | 4.4 |
(a) | Excludes money market funds. | |
| | |
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2018 | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Technology ETF |
| | |
Investment Objective
The iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (the “Fund”) seeks to provide access to U.S. companies with technology exposure, as classified using a proprietary classification system. The Fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that does not seek to replicate the performance of a specified index.
Performance
| | |
| | Cumulative Total Returns |
| | Since |
| | Inception |
Fund NAV | | 6.00% |
Fund Market | | 6.04 |
S&P Total Market IndexTM | | 4.51 |
For the fiscal period ended 7/31/18, the Fund did not have six months of performance and therefore line graphs are not presented.
The inception date of the Fund was 3/21/18. The first day of secondary market trading was 3/23/18.
The S&P Total Market IndexTM is an unmanaged index designed to track the broad equity market, including large-, mid-, small-, and micro-cap stocks.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Performance results do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or on the redemption or sale of fund shares. See “About Fund Performance” on page 20 for more information.
Expense Example
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | | Hypothetical 5% Return | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Beginning Account Value (03/21/18)(a) | | Ending Account Value (07/31/18) | | | Expenses Paid During the Period (b) | | | Beginning Account Value (02/01/18) | | | Ending Account Value (07/31/18) | | | Expenses Paid During the Period (b) | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | |
$ 1,000.00 | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 0.65 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,023.90 | | | $ | 0.90 | | | | 0.18 | % |
| (a) | The beginning of the period (commencement of operations) is March 21, 2018. |
| (b) | Expenses are calculated using the Fund’s annualized expense ratio (as disclosed in the table), multiplied by the average account value for the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period (132 days for actual and 181 days for hypothetical expenses) and divided by the number of days in the year (365 days). See “Shareholder Expenses” on page 20 for more information. |
Portfolio Management Commentary
The increase in capital raised in technology initial public offerings (“IPOs”) reflected a relatively solid environment for U.S. technology stocks. While IPOs grew at a modest pace in 2017, activity increased in the second quarter of 2018 as more companies went public than in any quarter in the previous three years. Online retail, digital advertising, cloud computing, and streaming video continued to drive growth in the technology sector. Investors’ expectations for growth in artificial intelligence (“AI”), blockchain, and connected devices also benefited U.S. technology stocks.
For the reporting period, the Fund outperformed the broader market, as represented by the S&P Total Market Index. Growth in cloud-based services and AI and machine-learning solutions benefited software and services stocks, such as Microsoft Corp. and Alphabet Inc., as businesses implemented software solutions to improve customer service and business efficiency. Consumers continued to spend more time on mobile devices than on television, which led to growth in digital advertising for many software companies. Online shopping also increased the use of digital payments, benefiting companies like Visa Inc.
Technology hardware and equipment stocks, such as Apple Inc., advanced as new smartphone models allayed investors’ concerns about a broader slowdown in smartphone sales. On the downside, International Business Machines Corp. declined for the reporting period. The company struggled to develop innovative and effective technologies after making major investments in AI and machine learning.
The Fund’s evolved investment process looks beyond the traditional sector definitions by applying machine learning and natural language processing to group individual companies with related business activity. During the reporting period, the evolved process identified several technology companies with similar businesses that have traditionally been categorized in other sectors. For example, Amazon.com Inc. is often grouped with traditional retail stores. The company advanced as it continued to leverage AI and machine learning to capture market share from traditional retailers while expanding its cloud-computing services. Amazon.com also gained market share in digital advertising, as retailers boosted spending on digital display ads.
| | |
18 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2018 | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Technology ETF |
| | |
Portfolio Information
| | |
ALLOCATION BY SECTOR |
Sector | | Percent of Total Investments(a) |
Internet | | 29.4% |
Software | | 27.8 |
Computers | | 16.0 |
Semiconductors | | 9.4 |
Diversified Financial Services | | 5.9 |
Commercial Services | | 4.3 |
Telecommunications | | 3.9 |
Other (each representing less than 1%) | | 3.3 |
| | |
TEN LARGEST HOLDINGS |
Security | | Percent of Total Investments(a) |
Microsoft Corp. | | 13.4% |
Apple Inc. | | 10.8 |
Amazon. com Inc. | | 7.9 |
Facebook Inc., Class A | | 6.2 |
Alphabet Inc., Class C | | 5.5 |
Alphabet Inc., Class A | | 5.4 |
Cisco Systems Inc. | | 3.2 |
Oracle Corp. | | 2.8 |
Visa Inc., Class A | | 2.8 |
International Business Machines Corp. | | 2.3 |
(a) | Excludes money market funds. | |
About Fund Performance
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Performance data current to the most recent month-end is available at www.ishares.com. Performance results assume reinvestment of all dividends and capital gain distributions and do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or on the redemption or sale of fund shares. The investment return and principal value of shares will vary with changes in market conditions. Shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when they are redeemed or sold in the market. Performance for certain funds may reflect a waiver of a portion of investment advisory fees. Without such a waiver, performance would have been lower.
Net asset value or “NAV” is the value of one share of a fund as calculated in accordance with the standard formula for valuing mutual fund shares. The price used to calculate market return (“Market Price”) is determined by using the midpoint between the highest bid and the lowest ask on the primary stock exchange on which shares of a fund are listed for trading, as of the time that such fund’s NAV is calculated. Since shares of a fund may not trade in the secondary market until after the fund’s inception, for the period from inception to the first day of secondary market trading in shares of the fund, the NAV of the fund is used as a proxy for the Market Price to calculate market returns. Market and NAV returns assume that dividends and capital gain distributions have been reinvested at Market Price and NAV, respectively.
An index is a statistical composite that tracks a specified financial market or sector. Unlike a fund, an index does not actually hold a portfolio of securities and therefore does not incur the expenses incurred by a fund. These expenses negatively impact fund performance. Also, market returns do not include brokerage commissions that may be payable on secondary market transactions. If brokerage commissions were included, market returns would be lower.
Shareholder Expenses
As a shareholder of your Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including brokerage commissions on purchases and sales of fund shares and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees and other fund expenses. The expense example, which is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period (or from the commencement of operations if less than 6 months) and held through the end of the period, is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars and cents) of investing in your Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other funds.
Actual Expenses – The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. Annualized expense ratios reflect contractual and voluntary fee waivers, if any. To estimate the expenses that you paid on your account over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During the Period.”
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes – The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on your Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as brokerage commissions paid on purchases and sales of fund shares. Therefore, the hypothetical examples are useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| | |
20 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Schedule of Investments | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Advertising — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Omnicom Group Inc. | | | 48 | | | $ | 3,304 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Agriculture — 12.7% | | | | | | | | |
Altria Group Inc. | | | 3,045 | | | | 178,681 | |
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. | | | 1,290 | | | | 62,255 | |
Philip Morris International Inc. | | | 2,682 | | | | 231,457 | |
Universal Corp./VA | | | 63 | | | | 4,353 | |
Vector Group Ltd. | | | 102 | | | | 1,882 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 478,628 | |
| | |
Beverages — 26.3% | | | | | | | | |
Boston Beer Co. Inc. (The), Class A, NVS(a) | | | 18 | | | | 4,949 | |
Brown-Forman Corp., Class A | | | 210 | | | | 11,187 | |
Brown-Forman Corp., Class B, NVS | | | 681 | | | | 36,243 | |
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | | | 8,049 | | | | 375,325 | |
Constellation Brands Inc., Class A | | | 399 | | | | 83,882 | |
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. | | | 654 | | | | 15,703 | |
MGP Ingredients Inc. | | | 33 | | | | 2,708 | |
Molson Coors Brewing Co., Class B | | | 450 | | | | 30,150 | |
Monster Beverage Corp.(a) | | | 1,521 | | | | 91,290 | |
National Beverage Corp.(a) | | | 45 | | | | 4,748 | |
PepsiCo Inc. | | | 2,886 | | | | 331,890 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 988,075 | |
| | |
Biotechnology — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Incyte Corp.(a) | | | 27 | | | | 1,797 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Chemicals — 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Balchem Corp. | | | 33 | | | | 3,309 | |
FMC Corp. | | | 117 | | | | 10,516 | |
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. | | | 147 | | | | 19,516 | |
Sensient Technologies Corp. | | | 72 | | | | 4,994 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 38,335 | |
| | |
Commercial Services — 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
Ecolab Inc. | | | 120 | | | | 16,884 | |
Nutrisystem Inc. | | | 45 | | | | 1,800 | �� |
Weight Watchers International Inc.(a) | | | 27 | | | | 2,417 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 21,101 | |
| | |
Computers — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
HP Inc. | | | 165 | | | | 3,808 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Cosmetics & Personal Care — 9.1% | | | | | | | | |
Colgate-Palmolive Co. | | | 1,593 | | | | 106,747 | |
Coty Inc., Class A | | | 528 | | | | 7,081 | |
Edgewell Personal Care Co.(a) | | | 75 | | | | 4,040 | |
Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (The), Class A | | | 81 | | | | 10,930 | |
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | | | 2,613 | | | | 211,339 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 340,137 | |
| | |
Distribution & Wholesale — 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Core-Mark Holding Co. Inc. | | | 69 | | | | 1,668 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Diversified Financial Services — 0.3% | | | | | |
CME Group Inc. | | | 54 | | | | 8,592 | |
Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | | | 114 | | | | 2,765 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 11,357 | |
| | |
Electric — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Entergy Corp. | | | 111 | | | | 9,022 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Electrical Components & Equipment — 0.1% | | | | | |
Energizer Holdings Inc. | | | 84 | | | | 5,349 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Food — 26.7% | | | | | | | | |
B&G Foods Inc.(b) | | | 231 | | | $ | 7,253 | |
Calavo Growers Inc. | | | 33 | | | | 3,053 | |
Cal-Maine Foods Inc.(a)(b) | | | 60 | | | | 2,700 | |
Campbell Soup Co. | | | 639 | | | | 26,135 | |
Conagra Brands Inc. | | | 1,326 | | | | 48,677 | |
Darling Ingredients Inc.(a) | | | 261 | | | | 5,244 | |
Dean Foods Co. | | | 243 | | | | 2,386 | |
Flowers Foods Inc. | | | 357 | | | | 7,283 | |
General Mills Inc. | | | 2,106 | | | | 97,002 | |
Hain Celestial Group Inc. (The)(a) | | | 312 | | | | 8,873 | |
Hershey Co. (The) | | | 465 | | | | 45,668 | |
Hormel Foods Corp. | | | 723 | | | | 26,006 | |
Hostess Brands Inc.(a) | | | 195 | | | | 2,732 | |
Ingredion Inc. | | | 171 | | | | 17,322 | |
J&J Snack Foods Corp. | | | 39 | | | | 5,653 | |
JM Smucker Co. (The) | | | 375 | | | | 41,670 | |
John B Sanfilippo & Son Inc. | | | 27 | | | | 2,075 | |
Kellogg Co. | | | 987 | | | | 70,107 | |
Kraft Heinz Co. (The) | | | 2,340 | | | | 140,985 | |
Lamb Weston Holdings Inc. | | | 387 | | | | 27,195 | |
Lancaster Colony Corp. | | | 51 | | | | 7,397 | |
McCormick & Co. Inc./MD, NVS | | | 303 | | | | 35,615 | |
Mondelez International Inc., Class A | | | 4,425 | | | | 191,957 | |
Performance Food Group Co.(a) | | | 138 | | | | 4,947 | |
Pilgrim’s Pride Corp.(a) | | | 90 | | | | 1,604 | |
Pinnacle Foods Inc. | | | 351 | | | | 23,313 | |
Post Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 219 | | | | 18,957 | |
Sanderson Farms Inc. | | | 36 | | | | 3,630 | |
Sprouts Farmers Market Inc.(a) | | | 135 | | | | 2,901 | |
Sysco Corp. | | | 822 | | | | 55,247 | |
Tootsie Roll Industries Inc. | | | 42 | | | | 1,256 | |
TreeHouse Foods Inc.(a) | | | 192 | | | | 9,118 | |
Tyson Foods Inc., Class A | | | 828 | | | | 47,734 | |
U.S. Foods Holding Corp.(a) | | | 303 | | | | 10,244 | |
United Natural Foods Inc.(a) | | | 66 | | | | 2,125 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 1,004,064 | |
| |
Holding Companies - Diversified — 0.1% | | | | | |
Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 21 | | | | 1,835 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Home Furnishings — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Whirlpool Corp. | | | 42 | | | | 5,506 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Household Products & Wares — 2.2% | | | | | | | | |
ACCO Brands Corp. | | | 93 | | | | 1,190 | |
Central Garden & Pet Co., Class A, NVS(a) | | | 39 | | | | 1,565 | |
Church & Dwight Co. Inc. | | | 309 | | | | 17,273 | |
Clorox Co. (The) | | | 123 | | | | 16,626 | |
Kimberly-Clark Corp. | | | 387 | | | | 44,064 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 80,718 | |
| | |
Housewares — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. (The) | | | 42 | | | | 3,336 | |
Tupperware Brands Corp. | | | 48 | | | | 1,762 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 5,098 | |
| | |
Machinery — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
AGCO Corp. | | | 69 | | | | 4,348 | |
Middleby Corp. (The)(a) | | | 27 | | | | 2,767 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 7,115 | |
| | |
Manufacturing — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
AptarGroup Inc. | | | 27 | | | | 2,766 | |
| | |
S C H E D U L E O F I N V E S T M E N T S | | 21 |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Manufacturing (continued) | | | | | | | | |
John Bean Technologies Corp. | | | 36 | | | $ | 3,981 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 6,747 | |
| | |
Oil & Gas — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Valero Energy Corp. | | | 78 | | | | 9,231 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Packaging & Containers — 1.6% | | | | | | | | |
Ball Corp. | | | 627 | | | | 24,434 | |
Bemis Co. Inc. | | | 135 | | | | 6,198 | |
Crown Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 246 | | | | 11,136 | |
Owens-Illinois Inc.(a) | | | 234 | | | | 4,371 | |
Packaging Corp. of America | | | 15 | | | | 1,694 | |
Sealed Air Corp. | | | 78 | | | | 3,438 | |
Silgan Holdings Inc. | | | 111 | | | | 3,054 | |
Sonoco Products Co. | | | 126 | | | | 7,033 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 61,358 | |
| | |
Pharmaceuticals — 1.3% | | | | | | | | |
Neogen Corp.(a) | | | 81 | | | | 6,674 | |
Prestige Brands Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 66 | | | | 2,358 | |
Zoetis Inc. | | | 474 | | | | 40,992 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 50,024 | |
| | |
Retail — 10.7% | | | | | | | | |
Casey’s General Stores Inc. | | | 33 | | | | 3,610 | |
Cheesecake Factory Inc. (The) | | | 42 | | | | 2,353 | |
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.(a) | | | 42 | | | | 18,214 | |
Costco Wholesale Corp. | | | 183 | | | | 40,024 | |
Darden Restaurants Inc. | | | 105 | | | | 11,229 | |
Dunkin’ Brands Group Inc. | | | 117 | | | | 8,147 | |
Jack in the Box Inc. | | | 27 | | | | 2,274 | |
McDonald’s Corp. | | | 918 | | | | 144,622 | |
Starbucks Corp. | | | 2,235 | | | | 117,092 | |
Walmart Inc. | | | 150 | | | | 13,384 | |
Wendy’s Co. (The) | | | 90 | | | | 1,501 | |
Wingstop Inc. | | | 27 | | | | 1,332 | |
Yum China Holdings Inc. | | | 330 | | | | 11,906 | |
Yum! Brands Inc. | | | 306 | | | | 24,263 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 399,951 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Software — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Activision Blizzard Inc. | | | 99 | | | $ | 7,269 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Toys, Games & Hobbies — 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Hasbro Inc. | | | 39 | | | | 3,885 | |
Mattel Inc. | | | 357 | | | | 5,665 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 9,550 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total Common Stocks — 94.6% (Cost: $3,533,593) | | | | | | | 3,551,047 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Short-Term Investments | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Money Market Funds — 5.6% | | | | | | | | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Institutional, SL Agency Shares, 2.14%(c)(d)(e) | | | 10,250 | | | | 10,253 | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares, 1.83%(c)(d) | | | 200,121 | | | | 200,121 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 210,374 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments — 5.6% (Cost: $210,374) | | | | | | | 210,374 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total Investments in Securities — 100.2% (Cost: $3,743,967) | | | | | | | 3,761,421 | |
| | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (0.2)% | | | | | | | (6,181 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 3,755,240 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(b) | All or a portion of this security is on loan. |
(c) | Affiliate of the Fund. |
(d) | Annualized 7-day yield as of period-end. |
(e) | All or a portion of this security was purchased with cash collateral received from loaned securities. |
Affiliates
Investments in issuers considered to be affiliates of the Fund during the period ended July 31, 2018, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the 1940 Act, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated Issuer | |
| Shares Held at 03/21/18 | (a) | | | Net Activity | | |
| Shares Held at 07/31/18 | | |
| Value at 07/31/18 | | | | Income | | |
| Net Realized Gain (Loss) | (b) | |
| Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Institutional, SL Agency Shares | | | — | | | | 10,250 | | | | 10,250 | | | $ | 10,253 | | | $ | 8 | (c) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares | | | — | | | | 200,121 | | | | 200,121 | | | | 200,121 | | | | 581 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 210,374 | | | $ | 589 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (a) | The Fund commenced operations on March 21, 2018. |
| (b) | Includes realized capital gain distributions from an affiliated fund, if any. |
| (c) | Includes securities lending income earned from the reinvestment of cash collateral from loaned securities (excluding collateral investment fees), net of fees and other payments to and from borrowers of securities, and less fees paid to BTC as securities lending agent. |
Fair Value Measurements
Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of financial instruments. For description of the input levels and information about the Fund’s policy regarding valuation of financial instruments, refer to the Notes to Financial Statements.
| | |
22 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | |
Fair Value Measurements (continued)
The following table summarizes the value of the Fund’s investments according to the fair value hierarchy as of July 31, 2018. The breakdown of the Fund’s investments into major categories is disclosed in the Schedule of Investments above.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 3,551,047 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,551,047 | |
Money Market Funds | | | 210,374 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 210,374 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 3,761,421 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,761,421 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
S C H E D U L E O F I N V E S T M E N T S | | 23 |
| | |
Schedule of Investments | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Airlines — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Alaska Air Group Inc. | | | 104 | | | $ | 6,535 | |
JetBlue Airways Corp.(a) | | | 276 | | | | 4,968 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 11,503 | |
| | |
Apparel — 7.8% | | | | | | | | |
Carter’s Inc. | | | 140 | | | | 14,676 | |
Columbia Sportswear Co. | | | 72 | | | | 6,263 | |
Crocs Inc.(a) | | | 136 | | | | 2,463 | |
Deckers Outdoor Corp.(a) | | | 84 | | | | 9,478 | |
Hanesbrands Inc. | | | 736 | | | | 16,383 | |
NIKE Inc., Class B | | | 2,644 | | | | 203,350 | |
Oxford Industries Inc. | | | 48 | | | | 4,422 | |
PVH Corp. | | | 204 | | | | 31,318 | |
Ralph Lauren Corp. | | | 140 | | | | 18,897 | |
Skechers U.S.A. Inc., Class A(a) | | | 336 | | | | 9,314 | |
Steven Madden Ltd. | | | 148 | | | | 7,999 | |
Under Armour Inc., Class A(a) | | | 404 | | | | 8,068 | |
Under Armour Inc., Class C, NVS(a) | | | 412 | | | | 7,721 | |
VF Corp. | | | 784 | | | | 72,183 | |
Wolverine World Wide Inc. | | | 124 | | | | 4,387 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 416,922 | |
| | |
Building Materials — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
American Woodmark Corp.(a) | | | 16 | | | | 1,334 | |
Masco Corp. | | | 104 | | | | 4,195 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 5,529 | |
| | |
Chemicals — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Valvoline Inc. | | | 168 | | | | 3,795 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Commercial Services — 1.3% | | | | | | | | |
Aaron’s Inc. | | | 144 | | | | 6,237 | |
Avis Budget Group Inc.(a) | | | 68 | | | | 2,370 | |
Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc.(a) | | | 20 | | | | 2,140 | |
Brink’s Co. (The) | | | 36 | | | | 2,875 | |
Cintas Corp. | | | 72 | | | | 14,722 | |
Euronet Worldwide Inc.(a) | | | 40 | | | | 3,678 | |
Grand Canyon Education Inc.(a) | | | 36 | | | | 4,195 | |
H&R Block Inc. | | | 224 | | | | 5,636 | |
ManpowerGroup Inc. | | | 60 | | | | 5,595 | |
Monro Inc. | | | 68 | | | | 4,586 | |
Rollins Inc. | | | 80 | | | | 4,395 | |
ServiceMaster Global Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 136 | | | | 7,751 | |
Sotheby’s(a) | | | 36 | | | | 1,912 | |
Weight Watchers International Inc.(a) | | | 36 | | | | 3,223 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 69,315 | |
| | |
Computers — 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
Apple Inc. | | | 148 | | | | 28,163 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Cosmetics & Personal Care — 5.0% | | | | | | | | |
Coty Inc., Class A | | | 344 | | | | 4,613 | |
Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (The), Class A | | | 364 | | | | 49,118 | |
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | | | 2,628 | | | | 212,553 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 266,284 | |
| | |
Distribution & Wholesale — 1.3% | | | | | | | | |
Fastenal Co. | | | 380 | | | | 21,633 | |
G-III Apparel Group Ltd.(a) | | | 116 | | | | 5,301 | |
HD Supply Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 124 | | | | 5,454 | |
KAR Auction Services Inc. | | | 96 | | | | 5,707 | |
LKQ Corp.(a) | | | 204 | | | | 6,838 | |
Pool Corp. | | | 44 | | | | 6,743 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Distribution & Wholesale (continued) | | | | | | | | |
SiteOne Landscape Supply Inc.(a) | | | 36 | | | $ | 3,210 | |
WW Grainger Inc. | | | 48 | | | | 16,635 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 71,521 | |
| | |
Diversified Financial Services — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Alliance Data Systems Corp. | | | 36 | | | | 8,096 | |
LendingTree Inc.(a) | | | 4 | | | | 955 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 9,051 | |
| | |
Entertainment — 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Cinemark Holdings Inc. | | | 128 | | | | 4,598 | |
Eldorado Resorts Inc.(a) | | | 80 | | | | 3,428 | |
Live Nation Entertainment Inc.(a) | | | 180 | | | | 8,870 | |
Madison Square Garden Co. (The), Class A(a) | | | 20 | | | | 6,244 | |
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corp. | | | 24 | | | | 2,859 | |
Pinnacle Entertainment Inc.(a) | | | 60 | | | | 1,994 | |
Red Rock Resorts Inc., Class A | | | 116 | | | | 4,099 | |
Scientific Games Corp./DE, Class A(a) | | | 44 | | | | 2,114 | |
Six Flags Entertainment Corp. | | | 68 | | | | 4,417 | |
Vail Resorts Inc. | | | 52 | | | | 14,397 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 53,020 | |
| | |
Food — 2.2% | | | | | | | | |
Flowers Foods Inc. | | | 180 | | | | 3,672 | |
Kroger Co. (The) | | | 2,420 | | | | 70,180 | |
Performance Food Group Co.(a)(b) | | | 128 | | | | 4,589 | |
Sprouts Farmers Market Inc.(a) | | | 252 | | | | 5,415 | |
Sysco Corp. | | | 364 | | | | 24,464 | |
U.S. Foods Holding Corp.(a) | | | 216 | | | | 7,303 | |
United Natural Foods Inc.(a) | | | 68 | | | | 2,190 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 117,813 | |
| | |
Food Service — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Aramark | | | 320 | | | | 12,868 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Hand & Machine Tools — 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Snap-on Inc. | | | 16 | | | | 2,713 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Holding Companies - Diversified — 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc.(a)(b) | | | 16 | | | | 1,398 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Home Builders — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
PulteGroup Inc. | | | 172 | | | | 4,900 | |
Taylor Morrison Home Corp., Class A(a) | | | 80 | | | | 1,563 | |
Toll Brothers Inc. | | | 104 | | | | 3,667 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 10,130 | |
| | |
Home Furnishings — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Sleep Number Corp.(a) | | | 68 | | | | 1,938 | |
Tempur Sealy International Inc.(a)(b) | | | 68 | | | | 3,323 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 5,261 | |
| | |
Household Products & Wares — 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Kimberly-Clark Corp. | | | 128 | | | | 14,574 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Housewares — 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Newell Brands Inc. | | | 432 | | | | 11,314 | |
Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. (The) | | | 32 | | | | 2,542 | |
Tupperware Brands Corp. | | | 44 | | | | 1,615 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 15,471 | |
| | |
Internet — 14.9% | | | | | | | | |
Amazon.com Inc.(a) | | | 344 | | | | 611,440 | |
Booking Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 56 | | | | 113,608 | |
Cars.com Inc.(a) | | | 60 | | | | 1,702 | |
eBay Inc.(a) | | | 332 | | | | 11,106 | |
Etsy Inc.(a) | | | 116 | | | | 4,740 | |
| | |
24 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Internet (continued) | | | | | | | | |
Expedia Group Inc. | | | 52 | | | $ | 6,960 | |
Groupon Inc.(a) | | | 484 | | | | 2,265 | |
GrubHub Inc.(a) | | | 88 | | | | 10,726 | |
Liberty Expedia Holdings Inc., Class A(a) | | | 64 | | | | 3,083 | |
MercadoLibre Inc. | | | 44 | | | | 15,088 | |
Shutterfly Inc.(a) | | | 28 | | | | 2,303 | |
Stamps.com Inc.(a) | | | 12 | | | | 3,132 | |
TripAdvisor Inc.(a) | | | 100 | | | | 5,799 | |
Wayfair Inc., Class A(a) | | | 72 | | | | 7,835 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 799,787 | |
| | |
Leisure Time — 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
Carnival Corp. | | | 556 | | | | 32,937 | |
Planet Fitness Inc., Class A(a) | | | 208 | | | | 9,884 | |
Polaris Industries Inc. | | | 28 | | | | 2,952 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 45,773 | |
| | |
Lodging — 3.6% | | | | | | | | |
Boyd Gaming Corp.(b) | | | 96 | | | | 3,586 | |
Caesars Entertainment Corp.(a)(b) | | | 156 | | | | 1,763 | |
Choice Hotels International Inc. | | | 64 | | | | 4,966 | |
Extended Stay America Inc. | | | 172 | | | | 3,662 | |
Hilton Grand Vacations Inc.(a) | | | 84 | | | | 2,905 | |
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | | | 344 | | | | 27,059 | |
Hyatt Hotels Corp., Class A | | | 64 | | | | 5,007 | |
ILG Inc. | | | 140 | | | | 4,806 | |
Las Vegas Sands Corp. | | | 496 | | | | 35,662 | |
Marriott International Inc./MD, Class A | | | 392 | | | | 50,113 | |
MGM Resorts International | | | 572 | | | | 17,944 | |
Wyndham Destinations Inc. | | | 164 | | | | 7,564 | |
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Inc. | | | 164 | | | | 9,512 | |
Wynn Resorts Ltd. | | | 100 | | | | 16,678 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 191,227 | |
| | |
Machinery — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Middleby Corp. (The)(a) | | | 20 | | | | 2,050 | |
Welbilt Inc.(a) | | | 100 | | | | 2,280 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 4,330 | |
| | |
Office Furnishings — 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Herman Miller Inc. | | | 48 | | | | 1,817 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Oil & Gas — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Murphy USA Inc.(a) | | | 48 | | | | 3,804 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Pharmaceuticals — 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
CVS Health Corp. | | | 292 | | | | 18,939 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Real Estate — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
RE/MAX Holdings Inc., Class A | | | 28 | | | | 1,422 | |
Realogy Holdings Corp. | | | 100 | | | | 2,187 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 3,609 | |
| |
Real Estate Investment Trusts — 1.4% | | | | | |
Apple Hospitality REIT Inc. | | | 168 | | | | 3,022 | |
CorePoint Lodging Inc.(a) | | | 78 | | | | 1,970 | |
Host Hotels & Resorts Inc. | | | 532 | | | | 11,140 | |
Macerich Co. (The) | | | 104 | | | | 6,142 | |
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. | | | 120 | | | | 3,754 | |
Ruth’s Hospitality Group Inc. | | | 72 | | | | 2,084 | |
Ryman Hospitality Properties Inc. | | | 32 | | | | 2,720 | |
Tailored Brands Inc. | | | 140 | | | | 2,823 | |
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers Inc. | | | 120 | | | | 2,862 | |
Tapestry Inc. | | | 740 | | | | 34,869 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| |
Real Estate Investment Trusts (continued) | | | | | |
Taubman Centers Inc. | | | 72 | | | $ | 4,468 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 75,854 | |
| | |
Retail — 56.1% | | | | | | | | |
Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Class A | | | 184 | | | | 4,359 | |
Advance Auto Parts Inc. | | | 168 | | | | 23,727 | |
American Eagle Outfitters Inc. | | | 468 | | | | 11,784 | |
AutoNation Inc.(a) | | | 84 | | | | 4,076 | |
AutoZone Inc.(a) | | | 60 | | | | 42,332 | |
Beacon Roofing Supply Inc.(a) | | | 48 | | | | 2,020 | |
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. | | | 380 | | | | 7,117 | |
Best Buy Co. Inc. | | | 540 | | | | 40,516 | |
Big Lots Inc. | | | 124 | | | | 5,385 | |
BJ’s Restaurants Inc. | | | 36 | | | | 2,277 | |
Bloomin’ Brands Inc. | | | 192 | | | | 3,713 | |
Brinker International Inc. | | | 116 | | | | 5,472 | |
Buckle Inc. (The) | | | 76 | | | | 1,828 | |
Burlington Stores Inc.(a) | | | 196 | | | | 29,951 | |
Caleres Inc. | | | 100 | | | | 3,349 | |
CarMax Inc.(a) | | | 272 | | | | 20,313 | |
Casey’s General Stores Inc. | | | 84 | | | | 9,188 | |
Cheesecake Factory Inc. (The) | | | 84 | | | | 4,707 | |
Chico’s FAS Inc. | | | 384 | | | | 3,341 | |
Children’s Place Inc. (The) | | | 56 | | | | 6,882 | |
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.(a) | | | 44 | | | | 19,081 | |
Copart Inc.(a) | | | 72 | | | | 4,132 | |
Costco Wholesale Corp. | | | 1,016 | | | | 222,209 | |
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Inc. | | | 56 | | | | 8,204 | |
Darden Restaurants Inc. | | | 268 | | | | 28,660 | |
Dave & Buster’s Entertainment Inc.(a) | | | 108 | | | | 5,308 | |
Denny’s Corp.(a) | | | 144 | | | | 2,095 | |
Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc. | | | 208 | | | | 7,101 | |
Dillard’s Inc., Class A(b) | | | 36 | | | | 2,890 | |
Dine Brands Global Inc. | | | 44 | | | | 3,125 | |
Dollar General Corp. | | | 704 | | | | 69,098 | |
Dollar Tree Inc.(a) | | | 704 | | | | 64,261 | |
Domino’s Pizza Inc. | | | 104 | | | | 27,317 | |
DSW Inc., Class A | | | 192 | | | | 5,269 | |
Dunkin’ Brands Group Inc. | | | 100 | | | | 6,963 | |
Express Inc.(a) | | | 240 | | | | 2,311 | |
FirstCash Inc. | | | 76 | | | | 6,171 | |
Five Below Inc.(a) | | | 156 | | | | 15,157 | |
Floor & Decor Holdings Inc., Class A(a) | | | 72 | | | | 3,438 | |
Foot Locker Inc. | | | 256 | | | | 12,495 | |
GameStop Corp., Class A | | | 212 | | | | 3,055 | |
Gap Inc. (The) | | | 696 | | | | 20,998 | |
Genesco Inc.(a) | | | 56 | | | | 2,279 | |
Genuine Parts Co. | | | 124 | | | | 12,067 | |
Guess? Inc. | | | 140 | | | | 3,172 | |
Home Depot Inc. (The) | | | 2,560 | | | | 505,651 | |
Jack in the Box Inc. | | | 64 | | | | 5,391 | |
JC Penney Co. Inc.(a)(b) | | | 548 | | | | 1,343 | |
Kohl’s Corp. | | | 488 | | | | 36,049 | |
L Brands Inc. | | | 760 | | | | 24,069 | |
La-Z-Boy Inc. | | | 72 | | | | 2,196 | |
Lithia Motors Inc., Class A | | | 28 | | | | 2,493 | |
Lowe’s Companies Inc. | | | 1,580 | | | | 156,957 | |
Lululemon Athletica Inc.(a) | | | 284 | | | | 34,066 | |
Macy’s Inc. | | | 672 | | | | 26,699 | |
McDonald’s Corp. | | | 1,296 | | | | 204,172 | |
Michaels Companies Inc. (The)(a) | | | 336 | | | | 6,858 | |
| | |
S C H E D U L E O F I N V E S T M E N T S | | 25 |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Retail (continued) | | | | | | | | |
MSC Industrial Direct Co. Inc., Class A | | | 40 | | | $ | 3,385 | |
Nordstrom Inc. | | | 280 | | | | 14,675 | |
Office Depot Inc. | | | 956 | | | | 2,400 | |
Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 124 | | | | 8,618 | |
O’Reilly Automotive Inc.(a) | | | 200 | | | | 61,200 | |
Papa John’s International Inc. | | | 60 | | | | 2,518 | |
PriceSmart Inc. | | | 56 | | | | 4,578 | |
RH(a)(b) | | | 56 | | | | 7,608 | |
Rite Aid Corp.(a)(b) | | | 1,812 | | | | 3,642 | |
Ross Stores Inc. | | | 1,100 | | | | 96,173 | |
Sally Beauty Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 324 | | | | 5,343 | |
Sonic Corp. | | | 68 | | | | 2,390 | |
Starbucks Corp. | | | 1,880 | | | | 98,493 | |
Target Corp. | | | 1,496 | | | | 120,697 | |
Texas Roadhouse Inc. | | | 144 | | | | 9,049 | |
Tiffany & Co. | | | 256 | | | | 35,215 | |
TJX Companies Inc. (The) | | | 1,708 | | | | 166,120 | |
Tractor Supply Co. | | | 332 | | | | 25,909 | |
Ulta Salon Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc.(a) | | | 160 | | | | 39,102 | |
Urban Outfitters Inc.(a) | | | 200 | | | | 8,880 | |
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. | | | 1,260 | | | | 85,201 | |
Walmart Inc. | | | 3,468 | | | | 309,450 | |
Wendy’s Co. (The) | | | 340 | | | | 5,671 | |
Williams-Sonoma Inc. | | | 228 | | | | 13,336 | |
Wingstop Inc. | | | 48 | | | | 2,369 | |
Yum China Holdings Inc. | | | 764 | | | | 27,565 | |
Yum! Brands Inc. | | | 724 | | | | 57,406 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 3,012,130 | |
| | |
Software — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
CDK Global Inc. | | | 84 | | | | 5,246 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Textiles — 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
UniFirst Corp./MA | | | 16 | | | | 2,994 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| |
Toys, Games & Hobbies — 0.3% | | | | | |
Hasbro Inc. | | | 96 | | | $ | 9,563 | |
Mattel Inc. | | | 312 | | | | 4,951 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 14,514 | |
| | |
Transportation — 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
FedEx Corp. | | | 168 | | | | 41,306 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Common Stocks — 99.4% | | | | | |
(Cost: $4,929,133) | | | | 5,336,661 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
Short-Term Investments | |
|
Money Market Funds — 1.1% | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Institutional, SL Agency Shares, 2.14%(c)(d)(e) | | | 29,994 | | | | 30,003 | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares, 1.83%(c)(d) | | | 28,996 | | | | 28,996 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 58,999 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Short-Term Investments — 1.1% | | | | | |
(Cost: $58,996) | | | | 58,999 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Investments in Securities — 100.5% | | | | | |
(Cost: $4,988,129) | | | | 5,395,660 | |
| |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (0.5)% | | | | (26,780 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | | $ | 5,368,880 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(b) | All or a portion of this security is on loan. |
(c) | Affiliate of the Fund. |
(d) | Annualized 7-day yield as of period-end. |
(e) | All or a portion of this security was purchased with cash collateral received from loaned securities. |
Affiliates
Investments in issuers considered to be affiliates of the Fund during the period ended July 31, 2018, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the 1940 Act, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated Issuer | |
| Shares Held at 03/21/18 |
(a) | | | Net Activity | | |
| Shares Held at 07/31/18 | | |
| Value at 07/31/18 | | | | Income | | |
| Net Realized Gain (Loss) | (b) | |
| Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Institutional, SL Agency Shares | | | — | | | | 29,994 | | | | 29,994 | | | $ | 30,003 | | | $ | 57 | (c) | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 3 | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares | | | — | | | | 28,996 | | | | 28,996 | | | | 28,996 | | | | 178 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 58,999 | | | $ | 235 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (a) | The Fund commenced operations on March 21, 2018. |
| (b) | Includes realized capital gain distributions from an affiliated fund, if any. |
| (c) | Includes securities lending income earned from the reinvestment of cash collateral from loaned securities (excluding collateral investment fees), net of fees and other payments to and from borrowers of securities, and less fees paid to BTC as securities lending agent. |
Fair Value Measurements
Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of financial instruments. For description of the input levels and information about the Fund’s policy regarding valuation of financial instruments, refer to the Notes to Financial Statements.
| | |
26 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | |
Fair Value Measurements (continued)
The following table summarizes the value of the Fund’s investments according to the fair value hierarchy as of July 31, 2018. The breakdown of the Fund’s investments into major categories is disclosed in the Schedule of Investments above.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 5,336,661 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,336,661 | |
Money Market Funds | | | 58,999 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 58,999 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 5,395,660 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,395,660 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
S C H E D U L E O F I N V E S T M E N T S | | 27 |
| | |
Schedule of Investments | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Financials ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Banks — 46.5% | | | | | | | | |
Ameris Bancorp | | | 64 | | | $ | 2,982 | |
Associated Banc-Corp. | | | 347 | | | | 9,369 | |
BancFirst Corp. | | | 46 | | | | 2,857 | |
Bank of America Corp. | | | 7,496 | | | | 231,476 | |
Bank of Hawaii Corp. | | | 94 | | | | 7,566 | |
Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (The) | | | 1,485 | | | | 79,403 | |
Bank OZK | | | 234 | | | | 9,571 | |
BankUnited Inc. | | | 216 | | | | 8,394 | |
Banner Corp. | | | 52 | | | | 3,274 | |
BB&T Corp. | | | 1,462 | | | | 74,284 | |
BOK Financial Corp. | | | 53 | | | | 5,159 | |
Boston Private Financial Holdings Inc. | | | 128 | | | | 1,843 | |
Bryn Mawr Bank Corp. | | | 63 | | | | 3,078 | |
Capital One Financial Corp. | | | 764 | | | | 72,060 | |
Cathay General Bancorp. | | | 180 | | | | 7,486 | |
CenterState Bank Corp. | | | 173 | | | | 4,801 | |
Chemical Financial Corp. | | | 147 | | | | 8,350 | |
CIT Group Inc. | | | 196 | | | | 10,374 | |
Citizens Financial Group Inc. | | | 874 | | | | 34,768 | |
City Holding Co. | | | 40 | | | | 3,219 | |
Columbia Banking System Inc. | | | 153 | | | | 6,262 | |
Comerica Inc. | | | 314 | | | | 30,439 | |
Commerce Bancshares Inc./MO | | | 191 | | | | 12,759 | |
Community Bank System Inc. | | | 114 | | | | 7,211 | |
ConnectOne Bancorp. Inc. | | | 76 | | | | 1,885 | |
Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc. | | | 118 | | | | 13,038 | |
CVB Financial Corp. | | | 244 | | | | 5,836 | |
Eagle Bancorp. Inc.(a) | | | 67 | | | | 3,621 | |
East West Bancorp. Inc. | | | 288 | | | | 18,645 | |
Enterprise Financial Services Corp. | | | 58 | | | | 3,263 | |
FCB Financial Holdings Inc., Class A(a) | | | 84 | | | | 4,284 | |
Fifth Third Bancorp. | | | 1,316 | | | | 38,940 | |
First BanCorp./Puerto Rico(a) | | | 384 | | | | 3,156 | |
First Bancorp./Southern Pines NC | | | 71 | | | | 2,941 | |
First Busey Corp. | | | 112 | | | | 3,553 | |
First Citizens BancShares Inc./NC, Class A | | | 15 | | | | 6,102 | |
First Commonwealth Financial Corp. | | | 268 | | | | 4,521 | |
First Financial Bancorp. | | | 210 | | | | 6,374 | |
First Financial Bankshares Inc. | | | 142 | | | | 8,037 | |
First Hawaiian Inc. | | | 121 | | | | 3,419 | |
First Horizon National Corp. | | | 652 | | | | 11,664 | |
First Interstate BancSystem Inc., Class A | | | 83 | | | | 3,581 | |
First Midwest Bancorp. Inc. | | | 230 | | | | 6,134 | |
FNB Corp./PA | | | 695 | | | | 8,917 | |
Fulton Financial Corp. | | | 382 | | | | 6,628 | |
Glacier Bancorp. Inc. | | | 173 | | | | 7,387 | |
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (The) | | | 603 | | | | 143,170 | |
Great Western Bancorp. Inc. | | | 127 | | | | 5,315 | |
Hancock Whitney Corp. | | | 169 | | | | 8,492 | |
Hanmi Financial Corp. | | | 79 | | | | 1,979 | |
Heartland Financial USA Inc. | | | 71 | | | | 4,171 | |
Heritage Financial Corp./WA | | | 75 | | | | 2,629 | |
Home BancShares Inc./AR | | | 318 | | | | 7,374 | |
Hope Bancorp Inc. | | | 282 | | | | 4,732 | |
Huntington Bancshares Inc./OH | | | 1,901 | | | | 29,351 | |
IBERIABANK Corp. | | | 112 | | | | 9,307 | |
Independent Bank Corp./Rockland MA | | | 58 | | | | 5,127 | |
Independent Bank Group Inc. | | | 43 | | | | 2,885 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Banks (continued) | | | | | | | | |
International Bancshares Corp. | | | 134 | | | $ | 5,956 | |
JPMorgan Chase &Co. | | | 2,018 | | | | 231,969 | |
KeyCorp . | | | 2,018 | | | | 42,116 | |
Lakeland Bancorp. Inc. | | | 132 | | | | 2,561 | |
Lakeland Financial Corp. | | | 67 | | | | 3,249 | |
LegacyTexas Financial Group Inc. | | | 91 | | | | 3,989 | |
M&T Bank Corp. | | | 119 | | | | 20,629 | |
MB Financial Inc. | | | 162 | | | | 7,849 | |
Morgan Stanley | | | 2,184 | | | | 110,423 | |
National Bank Holdings Corp., Class A | | | 71 | | | | 2,810 | |
NBT Bancorp. Inc. | | | 113 | | | | 4,547 | |
Northern Trust Corp. | | | 407 | | | | 44,453 | |
Old National Bancorp./IN | | | 329 | | | | 6,399 | |
PacWest Bancorp. | | | 229 | | | | 11,500 | |
Park National Corp. | | | 33 | | | | 3,614 | |
Pinnacle Financial Partners Inc. | | | 147 | | | | 9,188 | |
Popular Inc. | | | 194 | | | | 9,628 | |
Prosperity Bancshares Inc. | | | 143 | | | | 10,031 | |
Regions Financial Corp. | | | 2,153 | | | | 40,067 | |
Renasant Corp. | | | 114 | | | | 5,094 | |
S&T Bancorp. Inc. | | | 84 | | | | 3,760 | |
Sandy Spring Bancorp. Inc. | | | 78 | | | | 3,051 | |
Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida(a) | | | 99 | | | | 2,902 | |
ServisFirst Bancshares Inc. | | | 94 | | | | 3,972 | |
Simmons First National Corp., Class A | | | 177 | | | | 5,275 | |
South State Corp. | | | 82 | | | | 6,863 | |
Southside Bancshares Inc. | | | 85 | | | | 2,915 | |
State Bank Financial Corp. | | | 96 | | | | 3,019 | |
State Street Corp. | | | 643 | | | | 56,783 | |
SunTrust Banks Inc. | | | 894 | | | | 64,431 | |
SVB Financial Group(a) | | | 95 | | | | 29,249 | |
Synovus Financial Corp. | | | 236 | | | | 11,663 | |
TCF Financial Corp. | | | 260 | | | | 6,529 | |
Texas Capital Bancshares Inc.(a) | | | 54 | | | | 4,903 | |
Tompkins Financial Corp. | | | 38 | | | | 3,256 | |
U.S. Bancorp. | | | 3,007 | | | | 159,401 | |
UMB Financial Corp. | | | 94 | | | | 6,758 | |
Umpqua Holdings Corp. | | | 398 | | | | 8,477 | |
Union Bankshares Corp. | | | 140 | | | | 5,671 | |
United Community Banks Inc./GA | | | 128 | | | | 3,844 | |
Valley National Bancorp. | | | 594 | | | | 6,920 | |
Webster Financial Corp. | | | 186 | | | | 12,003 | |
Wells Fargo &Co. | | | 3,849 | | | | 220,509 | |
WesBanco Inc. | | | 103 | | | | 5,034 | |
Westamerica Bancorp. | | | 61 | | | | 3,661 | |
Western Alliance Bancorp.(a) | | | 152 | | | | 8,621 | |
Wintrust Financial Corp. | | | 116 | | | | 10,177 | |
Zions BanCorp. | | | 385 | | | | 19,905 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 2,289,067 | |
Commercial Services — 4.4% | | | | | | | | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc. | | | 246 | | | | 33,208 | |
CoreLogic Inc./U.S.(a) | | | 64 | | | | 3,117 | |
Equifax Inc. | | | 78 | | | | 9,789 | |
Euronet Worldwide Inc.(a) | | | 25 | | | | 2,299 | |
FleetCor Technologies Inc.(a) | | | 42 | | | | 9,114 | |
Global Payments Inc. | | | 100 | | | | 11,257 | |
Green Dot Corp., Class A(a) | | | 57 | | | | 4,521 | |
H&R Block Inc. | | | 95 | | | | 2,390 | |
HealthEquity Inc.(a) | | | 37 | | | | 2,793 | |
Insperity Inc. | | | 29 | | | | 2,758 | |
| | |
28 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Financials ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
|
Commercial Services (continued) | |
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. | | | 33 | | | $ | 6,394 | |
Moody’s Corp. | | | 161 | | | | 27,550 | |
PayPal Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 41 | | | | 3,368 | |
S&P Global Inc. | | | 175 | | | | 35,077 | |
Service Corp. International/U.S. | | | 111 | | | | 4,368 | |
Total System Services Inc. | | | 164 | | | | 15,013 | |
Verisk Analytics Inc.(a) | | | 127 | | | | 14,049 | |
Western Union Co. (The) | | | 326 | | | | 6,572 | |
WEX Inc.(a) | | | 37 | | | | 7,023 | |
Worldpay Inc., Class A(a) | | | 197 | | | | 16,191 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 216,851 | |
Diversified Financial Services — 15.6% | |
Affiliated Managers Group Inc. | | | 61 | | | | 9,761 | |
Alliance Data Systems Corp. | | | 33 | | | | 7,421 | |
Ally Financial Inc. | | | 740 | | | | 19,802 | |
American Express Co. | | | 1,012 | | | | 100,714 | |
Ameriprise Financial Inc. | | | 210 | | | | 30,591 | |
Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc., Class A | | | 70 | | | | 2,411 | |
BGC Partners Inc., Class A | | | 217 | | | | 2,331 | |
Cboe Global Markets Inc. | | | 101 | | | | 9,810 | |
Charles Schwab Corp. (The) | | | 1,876 | | | | 95,789 | |
CME Group Inc. | | | 236 | | | | 37,552 | |
Credit Acceptance Corp.(a) | | | 23 | | | | 8,823 | |
Discover Financial Services | | | 480 | | | | 34,277 | |
E*TRADE Financial Corp.(a) | | | 435 | | | | 26,017 | |
Eaton Vance Corp., NVS | | | 167 | | | | 8,873 | |
Evercore Inc., Class A | | | 38 | | | | 4,294 | |
Franklin Resources Inc. | | | 455 | | | | 15,616 | |
Hilltop Holdings Inc. | | | 160 | | | | 3,328 | |
Interactive Brokers Group Inc., Class A | | | 71 | | | | 4,250 | |
Intercontinental Exchange Inc. | | | 498 | | | | 36,807 | |
Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | | | 355 | | | | 8,609 | |
Legg Mason Inc. | | | 140 | | | | 4,778 | |
LendingTree Inc.(a) | | | 5 | | | | 1,194 | |
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | | | 116 | | | | 7,690 | |
Mastercard Inc., Class A | | | 461 | | | | 91,278 | |
Moelis & Co., Class A | | | 41 | | | | 2,608 | |
Nasdaq Inc. | | | 105 | | | | 9,597 | |
Navient Corp. | | | 271 | | | | 3,580 | |
OneMain Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 116 | | | | 3,857 | |
Raymond James Financial Inc. | | | 231 | | | | 21,157 | |
Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. | | | 147 | | | | 2,828 | |
SEI Investments Co. | | | 153 | | | | 9,171 | |
SLM Corp.(a) | | | 711 | | | | 8,027 | |
Stifel Financial Corp. | | | 123 | | | | 6,781 | |
Synchrony Financial | | | 969 | | | | 28,043 | |
T Rowe Price Group Inc. | | | 323 | | | | 38,463 | |
TD Ameritrade Holding Corp. | | | 303 | | | | 17,316 | |
Visa Inc., Class A | | | 304 | | | | 41,569 | |
Waddell & Reed Financial Inc., Class A | | | 137 | | | | 2,837 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 767,850 | |
Electric — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Hawaiian Electric Industries Inc. | | | 139 | | | | 4,889 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Forest Products & Paper — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
International Paper Co. | | | 102 | | | | 5,480 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Health Care - Services — 3.4% | | | | | | | | |
Aetna Inc. | | | 193 | | | | 36,359 | |
Anthem Inc. | | | 138 | | | | 34,914 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
|
Health Care - Services (continued) | |
Cigna Corp. | | | 250 | | | $ | 44,855 | |
Molina Healthcare Inc.(a) | | | 33 | | | | 3,435 | |
UnitedHealth Group Inc. | | | 180 | | | | 45,580 | |
WellCare Health Plans Inc.(a) | | | 8 | | | | 2,139 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 167,282 | |
Holding Companies - Diversified — 0.1% | |
Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 23 | | | | 2,009 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Insurance — 21.2% | | | | | | | | |
Aflac Inc. | | | 1,363 | | | | 63,434 | |
Allstate Corp. (The) | | | 587 | | | | 55,835 | |
American Financial Group Inc./OH | | | 139 | | | | 15,664 | |
American International Group Inc. | | | 1,709 | | | | 94,354 | |
American National Insurance Co. | | | 22 | | | | 2,838 | |
AmTrust Financial Services Inc. | | | 201 | | | | 2,911 | |
Arthur J Gallagher &Co. | | | 250 | | | | 17,838 | |
Assurant Inc. | | | 74 | | | | 8,162 | |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Class B(a) | | | 625 | | | | 123,669 | |
Brighthouse Financial Inc.(a) | | | 154 | | | | 6,688 | |
Brown & Brown Inc. | | | 331 | | | | 9,685 | |
Cincinnati Financial Corp. | | | 297 | | | | 22,462 | |
CNA Financial Corp. | | | 66 | | | | 3,088 | |
Employers Holdings Inc. | | | 56 | | | | 2,601 | |
Erie Indemnity Co., Class A, NVS | | | 33 | | | | 4,100 | |
Fidelity National Financial Inc. | | | 344 | | | | 13,932 | |
Genworth Financial Inc., Class A(a) | | | 837 | | | | 3,850 | |
Hanover Insurance Group Inc. (The) | | | 81 | | | | 10,159 | |
Hartford Financial Services Group Inc. (The) | | | 674 | | | | 35,520 | |
Horace Mann Educators Corp. | | | 85 | | | | 3,715 | |
Kemper Corp. | | | 83 | | | | 6,623 | |
Lincoln National Corp. | | | 393 | | | | 26,763 | |
Loews Corp. | | | 240 | | | | 12,187 | |
Markel Corp.(a) | | | 19 | | | | 22,230 | |
Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc. | | | 664 | | | | 55,351 | |
Mercury General Corp. | | | 60 | | | | 3,086 | |
MetLife Inc. | | | 1,487 | | | | 68,015 | |
MGIC Investment Corp.(a) | | | 653 | | | | 8,149 | |
National General Holdings Corp. | | | 118 | | | | 3,254 | |
NMI Holdings Inc., Class A(a) | | | 119 | | | | 2,487 | |
Principal Financial Group Inc. | | | 530 | | | | 30,782 | |
ProAssurance Corp. | | | 105 | | | | 4,337 | |
Progressive Corp. (The) | | | 1,039 | | | | 62,350 | |
Prudential Financial Inc. | | | 778 | | | | 78,508 | |
Radian Group Inc. | | | 374 | | | | 7,162 | |
RLI Corp. | | | 90 | | | | 6,728 | |
Safety Insurance Group Inc. | | | 33 | | | | 3,023 | |
Selective Insurance Group Inc. | | | 112 | | | | 6,698 | |
Torchmark Corp. | | | 220 | | | | 19,375 | |
Travelers Companies Inc. (The) | | | 487 | | | | 63,378 | |
Universal Insurance Holdings Inc. | | | 64 | | | | 2,842 | |
Unum Group | | | 424 | | | | 16,846 | |
Voya Financial Inc. | | | 307 | | | | 15,510 | |
WR Berkley Corp. | | | 189 | | | | 14,328 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 1,040,517 | |
Leisure Time — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Harley-Davidson Inc. | | | 81 | | | | 3,474 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Machinery — 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
Caterpillar Inc. | | | 265 | | | | 38,107 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
S C H E D U L E O F I N V E S T M E N T S | | 29 |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Financials ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Manufacturing — 2.1% | | | | | | | | |
General Electric Co. | | | 7,582 | | | $ | 103,343 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Media — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
FactSet Research Systems Inc. | | | 16 | | | | 3,222 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Pharmaceuticals — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Express Scripts Holding Co.(a) | | | 80 | | | | 6,357 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Real Estate — 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Realogy Holdings Corp. | | | 87 | | | | 1,903 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Real Estate Investment Trusts — 0.9% | | | | | |
AGNC Investment Corp. | | | 213 | | | | 4,147 | |
Annaly Capital Management Inc. | | | 930 | | | | 9,970 | |
Colony Capital Inc. | | | 415 | | | | 2,556 | |
MFA Financial Inc. | | | 382 | | | | 3,075 | |
New Residential Investment Corp. | | | 268 | | | | 4,794 | |
Two Harbors Investment Corp. | | | 150 | | | | 2,325 | |
Weyerhaeuser Co. | | | 492 | | | | 16,817 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 43,684 | |
| | |
Retail — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
FirstCash Inc. | | | 30 | | | | 2,436 | |
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc., Class A | | | 40 | | | | 2,914 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 5,350 | |
| | |
Savings & Loans — 1.7% | | | | | | | | |
Beneficial Bancorp. Inc. | | | 159 | | | | 2,584 | |
Berkshire Hills Bancorp. Inc. | | | 75 | | | | 3,045 | |
BofI Holding Inc.(a) | | | 95 | | | | 3,707 | |
Brookline Bancorp. Inc. | | | 175 | | | | 3,185 | |
Capitol Federal Financial Inc. | | | 292 | | | | 3,816 | |
Investors Bancorp. Inc. | | | 501 | | | | 6,272 | |
Meridian Bancorp. Inc. | | | 113 | | | | 2,068 | |
Meta Financial Group Inc. | | | 19 | | | | 1,700 | |
New York Community Bancorp. Inc. | | | 937 | | | | 10,091 | |
Northwest Bancshares Inc. | | | 224 | | | | 4,036 | |
OceanFirst Financial Corp. | | | 97 | | | | 2,829 | |
Pacific Premier Bancorp. Inc.(a) | | | 95 | | | | 3,515 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Savings & Loans (continued) | | | | | | | | |
People’s United Financial Inc. | | | 759 | | | $ | 13,837 | |
Provident Financial Services Inc. | | | 140 | | | | 3,576 | |
Sterling Bancorp./DE | | | 450 | | | | 9,990 | |
Washington Federal Inc. | | | 174 | | | | 5,838 | |
WSFS Financial Corp. | | | 71 | | | | 4,026 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 84,115 | |
| | |
Software — 1.6% | | | | | | | | |
Black Knight Inc.(a) | | | 48 | | | | 2,479 | |
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. | | | 90 | | | | 10,168 | |
Fidelity National Information Services Inc. | | | 285 | | | | 29,392 | |
First Data Corp., Class A(a) | | | 285 | | | | 6,629 | |
Fiserv Inc.(a) | | | 191 | | | | 14,417 | |
Guidewire Software Inc.(a) | | | 40 | | | | 3,448 | |
MSCI Inc. | | | 47 | | | | 7,811 | |
SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc. | | | 91 | | | | 4,830 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 79,174 | |
| |
Total Common Stocks — 98.9% | | | | | |
(Cost: $4,866,979) | | | | | | | 4,862,674 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
Short-Term Investments | |
| | |
Money Market Funds — 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares, 1.83%(b)(c) | | | 39,373 | | | | 39,373 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Short-Term Investments — 0.8% | | | | | |
(Cost: $39,373) | | | | | | | 39,373 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Investments in Securities — 99.7% | | | | | |
(Cost: $4,906,352) | | | | | | | 4,902,047 | |
| |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 0.3% | | | | 16,906 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | | $ | 4,918,953 | |
| | | | | �� | | | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(b) | Affiliate of the Fund. |
(c) | Annualized 7-day yield as of period-end. |
Affiliates
Investments in issuers considered to be affiliates of the Fund during the period ended July 31, 2018, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the 1940 Act, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated Issuer | |
| Shares Held at 03/21/18 |
(a) | | | Net Activity | | |
| Shares Held at 07/31/18 | | |
| Value at 07/31/18 | | | | Income | | |
| Net Realized Gain (Loss) | (b) | |
| Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares | | | — | | | | 39,373 | | | | 39,373 | | | $ | 39,373 | | | $ | 218 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (a) | The Fund commenced operations on March 21, 2018. |
| (b) | Includes realized capital gain distributions from an affiliated fund, if any. |
Fair Value Measurements
Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of financial instruments. For description of the input levels and information about the Fund’s policy regarding valuation of financial instruments, refer to the Notes to Financial Statements.
| | |
30 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Financials ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | |
Fair Value Measurements (continued)
The following table summarizes the value of the Fund’s investments according to the fair value hierarchy as of July 31, 2018. The breakdown of the Fund’s investments into major categories is disclosed in the Schedule of Investments above.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 4,862,674 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,862,674 | |
Money Market Funds | | | 39,373 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 39,373 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 4,902,047 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,902,047 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
S C H E D U L E O F I N V E S T M E N T S | | 31 |
| | |
Schedule of Investments | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | |
|
Aerospace & Defense — 1.0% | |
Boeing Co. (The) | | | 20 | | | $ | 7,126 | |
Lockheed Martin Corp. | | | 40 | | | | 13,044 | |
Northrop Grumman Corp. | | | 76 | | | | 22,837 | |
Raytheon Co. | | | 52 | | | | 10,298 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 53,305 | |
Biotechnology — 3.5% | |
Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Class A(a) | | | 48 | | | | 14,719 | |
Exact Sciences Corp.(a) | | | 352 | | | | 20,574 | |
Illumina Inc.(a) | | | 440 | | | | 142,719 | |
Myriad Genetics Inc.(a) | | | 192 | | | | 8,400 | |
NeoGenomics Inc.(a) | | | 240 | | | | 3,360 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 189,772 | |
Commercial Services — 1.2% | |
Adtalem Global Education Inc.(a) | | | 116 | | | | 6,328 | |
AMN Healthcare Services Inc.(a) | | | 132 | | | | 7,986 | |
ASGN Inc.(a) | | | 32 | | | | 2,890 | |
Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc.(a) | | | 64 | | | | 6,847 | |
Career Education Corp.(a) | | | 116 | | | | 2,134 | |
Graham Holdings Co., Class B | | | 8 | | | | 4,472 | |
Grand Canyon Education Inc.(a) | | | 76 | | | | 8,856 | |
Healthcare Services Group Inc. | | | 176 | | | | 7,086 | |
HealthEquity Inc.(a) | | | 56 | | | | 4,228 | |
HMS Holdings Corp.(a) | | | 260 | | | | 6,222 | |
Insperity Inc. | | | 40 | | | | 3,804 | |
Strategic Education Inc. | | | 20 | | | | 2,357 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 63,210 | |
Computers — 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Conduent Inc.(a) | | | 240 | | | | 4,310 | |
Leidos Holdings Inc. | | | 136 | | | | 9,305 | |
MAXIMUS Inc. | | | 140 | | | | 9,074 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 22,689 | |
Diversified Financial Services — 0.1% | |
WageWorks Inc.(a) | | | 52 | | | | 2,746 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
Electrical Components & Equipment — 0.0% | |
Novanta Inc.(a) | | | 44 | | | | 2,743 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Electronics — 1.4% | | | | | | | | |
Accelerate Diagnostics Inc.(a) | | | 96 | | | | 2,107 | |
Agilent Technologies Inc. | | | 572 | | | | 37,775 | |
OSI Systems Inc.(a) | | | 36 | | | | 2,871 | |
PerkinElmer Inc. | | | 208 | | | | 16,470 | |
Waters Corp.(a) | | | 96 | | | | 18,938 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 78,161 | |
Engineering & Construction — 0.1% | |
AECOM(a) | | | 84 | | | | 2,819 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
Environmental Control — 0.1% | |
Stericycle Inc.(a) | | | 96 | | | | 6,707 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
Health Care - Products — 36.9% | |
Abaxis Inc. | | | 52 | | | | 4,316 | |
Abbott Laboratories | | | 4,256 | | | | 278,938 | |
ABIOMED Inc.(a) | | | 124 | | | | 43,962 | |
Align Technology Inc.(a) | | | 108 | | | | 38,518 | |
AngioDynamics Inc.(a) | | | 96 | | | | 2,029 | |
AtriCure Inc.(a) | | | 96 | | | | 2,750 | |
Atrion Corp. | | | 4 | | | | 2,752 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
|
Health Care - Products (continued) | |
Avanos Medical Inc.(a) | | | 80 | | | $ | 4,416 | |
AxoGen Inc.(a) | | | 44 | | | | 1,977 | |
Baxter International Inc. | | | 752 | | | | 54,482 | |
Becton Dickinson and Co. | | | 688 | | | | 172,255 | |
Bio-Techne Corp. | | | 56 | | | | 8,996 | |
BioTelemetry Inc.(a) | | | 92 | | | | 4,830 | |
Boston Scientific Corp.(a) | | | 3,816 | | | | 128,256 | |
Bruker Corp. | | | 152 | | | | 4,925 | |
Cantel Medical Corp. | | | 48 | | | | 4,450 | |
Cardiovascular Systems Inc.(a) | | | 84 | | | | 3,186 | |
Cooper Companies Inc. (The) | | | 140 | | | | 36,470 | |
Cutera Inc.(a) | | | 28 | | | | 1,120 | |
Danaher Corp. | | | 1,388 | | | | 142,381 | |
DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc. | | | 372 | | | | 17,897 | |
Edwards Lifesciences Corp.(a) | | | 656 | | | | 93,447 | |
Foundation Medicine Inc.(a) | | | 32 | | | | 4,384 | |
Genomic Health Inc.(a) | | | 48 | | | | 2,577 | |
Globus Medical Inc., Class A(a) | | | 168 | | | | 8,649 | |
Haemonetics Corp.(a) | | | 96 | | | | 9,373 | |
Henry Schein Inc.(a) | | | 400 | | | | 31,764 | |
Hill-Rom Holdings Inc. | | | 160 | | | | 15,072 | |
Hologic Inc.(a) | | | 656 | | | | 28,149 | |
ICU Medical Inc.(a) | | | 40 | | | | 11,472 | |
IDEXX Laboratories Inc.(a) | | | 164 | | | | 40,169 | |
Inogen Inc.(a) | | | 52 | | | | 10,361 | |
Insulet Corp.(a) | | | 132 | | | | 10,977 | |
Integer Holdings Corp.(a) | | | 60 | | | | 4,287 | |
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corp.(a) | | | 168 | | | | 10,472 | |
Intersect ENT Inc.(a) | | | 44 | | | | 1,423 | |
Intuitive Surgical Inc.(a) | | | 380 | | | | 193,112 | |
iRhythm Technologies Inc.(a) | | | 56 | | | | 4,231 | |
K2M Group Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 104 | | | | 2,119 | |
LeMaitre Vascular Inc. | | | 44 | | | | 1,584 | |
Luminex Corp. | | | 92 | | | | 3,115 | |
Masimo Corp.(a) | | | 148 | | | | 14,714 | |
Merit Medical Systems Inc.(a) | | | 136 | | | | 7,385 | |
Natus Medical Inc.(a) | | | 84 | | | | 3,066 | |
Nevro Corp.(a) | | | 64 | | | | 3,601 | |
NuVasive Inc.(a) | | | 144 | | | | 8,359 | |
NxStage Medical Inc.(a) | | | 172 | | | | 4,828 | |
OPKO Health Inc.(a) | | | 628 | | | | 3,529 | |
OraSure Technologies Inc.(a) | | | 156 | | | | 2,619 | |
Patterson Companies Inc. | | | 200 | | | | 4,904 | |
Penumbra Inc.(a) | | | 84 | | | | 11,949 | |
Quidel Corp.(a) | | | 80 | | | | 5,429 | |
ResMed Inc. | | | 408 | | | | 43,158 | |
Stryker Corp. | | | 892 | | | | 145,619 | |
Teleflex Inc. | | | 116 | | | | 31,634 | |
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | | | 864 | | | | 202,634 | |
Varex Imaging Corp.(a) | | | 68 | | | | 2,600 | |
Varian Medical Systems Inc.(a) | | | 184 | | | | 21,243 | |
Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. | | | 524 | | | | 65,773 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 2,028,687 | |
Health Care - Services — 39.0% | |
Acadia Healthcare Co. Inc.(a) | | | 256 | | | | 10,107 | |
Aetna Inc. | | | 980 | | | | 184,622 | |
Amedisys Inc.(a) | | | 120 | | | | 11,236 | |
Anthem Inc. | | | 788 | | | | 199,364 | |
Brookdale Senior Living Inc.(a) | | | 476 | | | | 4,565 | |
Centene Corp.(a) | | | 588 | | | | 76,634 | |
| | |
32 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
|
Health Care - Services (continued) | |
Charles River Laboratories International Inc.(a) | | | 36 | | | $ | 4,475 | |
Chemed Corp. | | | 40 | | | | 12,641 | |
Cigna Corp. | | | 536 | | | | 96,169 | |
Community Health Systems Inc.(a) | | | 388 | | | | 1,296 | |
DaVita Inc.(a) | | | 608 | | | | 42,730 | |
Encompass Health Corp. | | | 388 | | | | 29,344 | |
Ensign Group Inc. (The) | | | 184 | | | | 6,637 | |
Envision Healthcare Corp.(a) | | | 504 | | | | 22,307 | |
HCA Healthcare Inc. | | | 1,180 | | | | 146,591 | |
Humana Inc. | | | 500 | | | | 157,090 | |
IQVIA Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 240 | | | | 29,266 | |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings(a) | | | 328 | | | | 57,512 | |
LHC Group Inc.(a) | | | 115 | | | | 9,899 | |
LifePoint Health Inc.(a) | | | 148 | | | | 9,590 | |
Magellan Health Inc.(a) | | | 76 | | | | 5,529 | |
MEDNAX Inc.(a) | | | 372 | | | | 15,918 | |
Molina Healthcare Inc.(a) | | | 84 | | | | 8,744 | |
National HealthCare Corp. | | | 32 | | | | 2,307 | |
Providence Service Corp. (The)(a) | | | 40 | | | | 2,803 | |
Quest Diagnostics Inc. | | | 452 | | | | 48,689 | |
Select Medical Holdings Corp.(a) | | | 448 | | | | 9,318 | |
Syneos Health Inc.(a) | | | 48 | | | | 2,365 | |
Teladoc Inc.(a) | | | 128 | | | | 7,661 | |
Tenet Healthcare Corp.(a) | | | 356 | | | | 13,396 | |
Tivity Health Inc.(a) | | | 148 | | | | 4,988 | |
U.S. Physical Therapy Inc. | | | 48 | | | | 5,028 | |
UnitedHealth Group Inc. | | | 3,264 | | | | 826,510 | |
Universal Health Services Inc., Class B | | | 320 | | | | 39,072 | |
WellCare Health Plans Inc.(a) | | | 152 | | | | 40,648 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 2,145,051 | |
| | |
Internet — 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
HealthStream Inc. | | | 68 | | | | 1,909 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Pharmaceuticals — 9.1% | | | | | | | | |
Akorn Inc.(a) | | | 100 | | | | 1,852 | |
AmerisourceBergen Corp. | | | 412 | | | | 33,714 | |
Cardinal Health Inc. | | | 840 | | | | 41,958 | |
CVS Health Corp. | | | 3,168 | | | | 205,476 | |
DexCom Inc.(a) | | | 180 | | | | 17,123 | |
Diplomat Pharmacy Inc.(a) | | | 184 | | | | 3,824 | |
Express Scripts Holding Co.(a) | | | 1,520 | | | | 120,779 | |
McKesson Corp. | | | 496 | | | | 62,298 | |
Owens & Minor Inc. | | | 136 | | | | 2,566 | |
PRA Health Sciences Inc.(a) | | | 56 | | | | 5,888 | |
Premier Inc., Class A(a) | | | 188 | | | | 7,031 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 502,509 | |
|
Real Estate Investment Trusts — 2.7% | |
CoreCivic Inc. | | | 184 | | | | 4,718 | |
GEO Group Inc. (The) | | | 208 | | | | 5,383 | |
HCP Inc. | | | 632 | | | | 16,369 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
|
Real Estate Investment Trusts (continued) | |
LTC Properties Inc. | | | 60 | | | $ | 2,530 | |
Medical Properties Trust Inc. | | | 924 | | | | 13,315 | |
National Health Investors Inc. | | | 80 | | | | 5,987 | |
Omega Healthcare Investors Inc. | | | 268 | | | | 7,957 | |
Physicians Realty Trust | | | 328 | | | | 5,169 | |
Sabra Health Care REIT Inc. | | | 320 | | | | 6,915 | |
Ventas Inc. | | | 568 | | | | 32,024 | |
Welltower Inc. | | | 800 | | | | 50,080 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 150,447 | |
Retail — 1.8% | | | | | | | | |
Rite Aid Corp.(a) | | | 2,212 | | | | 4,446 | |
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. | | | 1,400 | | | | 94,668 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 99,114 | |
Software — 1.8% | | | | | | | | |
2U Inc.(a)(b) | | | 56 | | | | 4,237 | |
Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Inc.(a) | | | 536 | | | | 6,561 | |
athenahealth Inc.(a) | | | 76 | | | | 11,454 | |
Cerner Corp.(a) | | | 932 | | | | 57,858 | |
Cotiviti Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 108 | | | | 4,821 | |
Evolent Health Inc., Class A(a) | | | 196 | | | | 3,959 | |
Omnicell Inc.(a) | | | 84 | | | | 4,998 | |
Tabula Rasa HealthCare Inc.(a) | | | 40 | | | | 2,330 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 96,218 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total Common Stocks — 99.1% | | | | | | | | |
(Cost: $4,916,167) | | | | | | | 5,446,087 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Short-Term Investments | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Money Market Funds — 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Institutional, SL Agency Shares, 2.14%(c)(d)(e) | | | 4,308 | | | | 4,310 | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares, 1.83%(c)(d) | | | 46,420 | | | | 46,420 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 50,730 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
Total Short-Term Investments — 0.9% | |
(Cost: $50,729) | | | | | | | 50,730 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
Total Investments in Securities — 100.0% | |
(Cost: $4,966,896) | | | | | | | 5,496,817 | |
| |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (0.0)% | | | | (1,443 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 5,495,374 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(b) | All or a portion of this security is on loan. |
(c) | Affiliate of the Fund. |
(d) | Annualized 7-day yield as of period-end. |
(e) | All or a portion of this security was purchased with cash collateral received from loaned securities. |
| | |
S C H E D U L E O F I N V E S T M E N T S | | 33 |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | |
Affiliates
Investments in issuers considered to be affiliates of the Fund during the period ended July 31, 2018, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the 1940 Act, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated Issuer | |
| Shares Held at 03/21/18 |
(a) | | | Net Activity | | |
| Shares Held at 07/31/18 | | |
| Value at 07/31/18 | | | | Income | | |
| Net Realized Gain (Loss) | (b) | |
| Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Institutional, SL Agency Shares | | | — | | | | 4,308 | | | | 4,308 | | | $ | 4,310 | | | $ | 25 | (c) | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares | | | — | | | | 46,420 | | | | 46,420 | | | | 46,420 | | | | 230 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 50,730 | | | $ | 255 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (a) | The Fund commenced operations on March 21, 2018. |
| (b) | Includes realized capital gain distributions from an affiliated fund, if any. |
| (c) | Includes securities lending income earned from the reinvestment of cash collateral from loaned securities (excluding collateral investment fees), net of fees and other payments to and from borrowers of securities, and less fees paid to BTC as securities lending agent. |
Fair Value Measurements
Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of financial instruments. For description of the input levels and information about the Fund’s policy regarding valuation of financial instruments, refer to the Notes to Financial Statements.
The following table summarizes the value of the Fund’s investments according to the fair value hierarchy as of July 31, 2018. The breakdown of the Fund’s investments into major categories is disclosed in the Schedule of Investments above.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 5,441,703 | | | $ | 4,384 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,446,087 | |
Money Market Funds | | | 50,730 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 50,730 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 5,492,433 | | | $ | 4,384 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,496,817 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
34 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Schedule of Investments | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Biotechnology — 43.8% | | | | | | | | |
Abeona Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 136 | | | $ | 1,965 | |
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 412 | | | | 6,217 | |
Acceleron Pharma Inc.(a) | | | 188 | | | | 8,189 | |
Achillion Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 624 | | | | 1,610 | |
Acorda Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 204 | | | | 5,090 | |
Aduro Biotech Inc.(a) | | | 184 | | | | 1,076 | |
Agenus Inc.(a) | | | 348 | | | | 637 | |
Alder Biopharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 312 | | | | 5,912 | |
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 917 | | | | 121,924 | |
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 496 | | | | 47,120 | |
AMAG Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 128 | | | | 2,822 | |
Amgen Inc. | | | 1,371 | | | | 269,470 | |
Amicus Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 876 | | | | 12,746 | |
AnaptysBio Inc.(a) | | | 68 | | | | 5,326 | |
ANI Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 28 | | | | 1,875 | |
Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 256 | | | | 9,879 | |
ArQule Inc.(a) | | | 498 | | | | 2,480 | |
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 360 | | | | 5,245 | |
Assembly Biosciences Inc.(a) | | | 88 | | | | 3,892 | |
Atara Biotherapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 128 | | | | 4,806 | |
Audentes Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 128 | | | | 4,819 | |
AVEO Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 536 | | | | 1,142 | |
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 428 | | | | 2,525 | |
Biogen Inc.(a) | | | 752 | | | | 251,446 | |
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.(a) | | | 869 | | | | 87,387 | |
Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Class A(a) | | | 8 | | | | 2,453 | |
Bluebird Bio Inc.(a) | | | 284 | | | | 43,992 | |
Blueprint Medicines Corp.(a) | | | 184 | | | | 10,955 | |
Cambrex Corp.(a) | | | 48 | | | | 3,000 | |
Cara Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 144 | | | | 2,582 | |
Celgene Corp.(a) | | | 2,745 | | | | 247,297 | |
Celldex Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 668 | | | | 311 | |
ChemoCentryx Inc.(a) | | | 132 | | | | 1,526 | |
Cymabay Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 319 | | | | 3,570 | |
CytomX Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 156 | | | | 4,109 | |
Deciphera Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 84 | | | | 2,890 | |
Denali Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 344 | | | | 4,331 | |
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 192 | | | | 2,419 | |
Dynavax Technologies Corp.(a) | | | 256 | | | | 3,456 | |
Editas Medicine Inc.(a) | | | 192 | | | | 5,710 | |
Emergent BioSolutions Inc.(a) | | | 128 | | | | 6,957 | |
Epizyme Inc.(a) | | | 240 | | | | 3,096 | |
Esperion Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 124 | | | | 5,573 | |
Exact Sciences Corp.(a) | | | 184 | | | | 10,755 | |
Exelixis Inc.(a) | | | 1,288 | | | | 26,662 | |
Fate Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 220 | | | | 1,965 | |
FibroGen Inc.(a) | | | 312 | | | | 19,687 | |
Five Prime Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 180 | | | | 2,682 | |
Geron Corp.(a)(b) | | | 492 | | | | 1,766 | |
Gilead Sciences Inc. | | | 3,230 | | | | 251,391 | |
GlycoMimetics Inc.(a) | | | 185 | | | | 2,718 | |
Halozyme Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 480 | | | | 8,688 | |
ImmunoGen Inc.(a) | | | 758 | | | | 7,049 | |
Immunomedics Inc.(a) | | | 804 | | | | 19,240 | |
Incyte Corp.(a) | | | 356 | | | | 23,688 | |
Innoviva Inc.(a) | | | 236 | | | | 3,339 | |
Insmed Inc.(a) | | | 360 | | | | 8,953 | |
Intellia Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 136 | | | | 3,620 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Biotechnology (continued) | | | | | | | | |
Intercept Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 88 | | | $ | 8,020 | |
Intrexon Corp.(a)(b) | | | 176 | | | | 2,580 | |
Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a)(b) | | | 580 | | | | 25,334 | |
Iovance Biotherapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 396 | | | | 5,623 | |
Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 224 | | | | 3,983 | |
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 212 | | | | 2,540 | |
Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 96 | | | | 20,960 | |
Loxo Oncology Inc.(a) | | | 137 | | | | 22,960 | |
MacroGenics Inc.(a) | | | 160 | | | | 3,304 | |
Medicines Co. (The)(a) | | | 312 | | | | 12,396 | |
Myriad Genetics Inc.(a) | | | 140 | | | | 6,125 | |
Novavax Inc.(a) | | | 1,288 | | | | 1,636 | |
Omeros Corp.(a) | | | 188 | | | | 3,959 | |
Pieris Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 256 | | | | 1,406 | |
PTC Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 202 | | | | 7,690 | |
Puma Biotechnology Inc.(a) | | | 156 | | | | 7,511 | |
Radius Health Inc.(a) | | | 200 | | | | 4,800 | |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 379 | | | | 139,476 | |
REGENXBIO Inc.(a) | | | 136 | | | | 9,561 | |
Retrophin Inc.(a) | | | 188 | | | | 5,196 | |
Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 716 | | | | 2,019 | |
Sage Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 247 | | | | 35,647 | |
Sangamo Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 396 | | | | 5,405 | |
Seattle Genetics Inc.(a) | | | 516 | | | | 36,326 | |
Solid Biosciences Inc.(a) | | | 65 | | | | 2,613 | |
Spark Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 152 | | | | 11,662 | |
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 468 | | | | 9,964 | |
Stemline Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 148 | | | | 2,279 | |
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.(a) | | | 224 | | | | 17,721 | |
United Therapeutics Corp.(a) | | | 188 | | | | 23,107 | |
Verastem Inc.(a) | | | 403 | | | | 3,103 | |
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 1,266 | | | | 221,613 | |
Viking Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 258 | | | | 2,632 | |
ZIOPHARM Oncology Inc.(a)(b) | | | 608 | | | | 1,575 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 2,282,756 | |
|
Electrical Components & Equipment — 0.1% | |
Universal Display Corp. | | | 56 | | | | 5,393 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Health Care - Products — 6.9% | | | | | |
Abaxis Inc. | | | 24 | | | | 1,992 | |
Abbott Laboratories | | | 1,984 | | | | 130,031 | |
ABIOMED Inc.(a) | | | 60 | | | | 21,272 | |
AxoGen Inc.(a) | | | 56 | | | | 2,516 | |
Baxter International Inc. | | | 604 | | | | 43,760 | |
Bio-Techne Corp. | | | 44 | | | | 7,068 | |
Cooper Companies Inc. (The) | | | 68 | | | | 17,714 | |
Foundation Medicine Inc.(a) | | | 32 | | | | 4,384 | |
Glaukos Corp.(a) | | | 104 | | | | 4,327 | |
Globus Medical Inc., Class A(a) | | | 84 | | | | 4,324 | |
Haemonetics Corp.(a) | | | 52 | | | | 5,077 | |
Hologic Inc.(a) | | | 144 | | | | 6,179 | |
ICU Medical Inc.(a) | | | 20 | | | | 5,736 | |
IDEXX Laboratories Inc.(a) | | | 92 | | | | 22,534 | |
Insulet Corp.(a) | | | 84 | | | | 6,986 | |
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corp.(a) | | | 68 | | | | 4,238 | |
Intersect ENT Inc.(a) | | | 72 | | | | 2,329 | |
Intuitive Surgical Inc.(a) | | | 45 | | | | 22,869 | |
Lantheus Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 112 | | | | 1,618 | |
Merit Medical Systems Inc.(a) | | | 52 | | | | 2,824 | |
Nevro Corp.(a) | | | 56 | | | | 3,151 | |
| | |
S C H E D U L E O F I N V E S T M E N T S | | 35 |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| |
Health Care - Products (continued) | | | | | |
NxStage Medical Inc.(a) | | | 68 | | | $ | 1,909 | |
OPKO Health Inc.(a) | | | 916 | | | | 5,148 | |
Penumbra Inc.(a) | | | 52 | | | | 7,397 | |
Quidel Corp.(a) | | | 40 | | | | 2,714 | |
Repligen Corp.(a) | | | 88 | | | | 4,253 | |
ResMed Inc. | | | 180 | | | | 19,040 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 361,390 | |
Health Care - Services — 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
Catalent Inc.(a) | | | 208 | | | | 8,674 | |
Charles River Laboratories International Inc.(a) | | | 72 | | | | 8,950 | |
IQVIA Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 208 | | | | 25,363 | |
Syneos Health Inc.(a) | | | 112 | | | | 5,519 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 48,506 | |
Pharmaceuticals — 47.4% | | | | | | | | |
AbbVie Inc. | | | 2,671 | | | | 246,346 | |
Achaogen Inc.(a)(b) | | | 152 | | | | 1,082 | |
Aclaris Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 136 | | | | 2,331 | |
Adamas Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 92 | | | | 2,188 | |
Aerie Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 180 | | | | 12,159 | |
Agios Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 228 | | | | 19,702 | |
Aimmune Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 192 | | | | 5,553 | |
Akcea Therapeutics Inc.(a)(b) | | | 52 | | | | 1,644 | |
Akebia Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 200 | | | | 2,060 | |
Akorn Inc.(a) | | | 208 | | | | 3,852 | |
AmerisourceBergen Corp. | | | 56 | | | | 4,583 | |
Amneal Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 1,293 | | | | 24,787 | |
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 132 | | | | 2,303 | |
Anika Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 40 | | | | 1,601 | |
Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 135 | | | | 2,484 | |
Array BioPharma Inc.(a) | | | 944 | | | | 14,528 | |
Athenex Inc.(a) | | | 140 | | | | 2,698 | |
Bausch Health Companies Inc.(a) | | | 888 | | | | 19,305 | |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | | | 3,832 | | | | 225,130 | |
Clovis Oncology Inc.(a) | | | 232 | | | | 10,241 | |
Coherus Biosciences Inc.(a) | | | 196 | | | | 3,734 | |
Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc.(a) | | | 108 | | | | 2,081 | |
Concert Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 96 | | | | 1,535 | |
Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 224 | | | | 1,131 | |
Corcept Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 440 | | | | 5,777 | |
Cytokinetics Inc.(a) | | | 216 | | | | 1,588 | |
Dermira Inc.(a) | | | 276 | | | | 2,688 | |
DexCom Inc.(a) | | | 148 | | | | 14,079 | |
Dova Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 64 | | | | 1,381 | |
Eagle Pharmaceuticals Inc./DE(a) | | | 56 | | | | 4,438 | |
Eli Lilly & Co. | | | 2,782 | | | | 274,889 | |
Enanta Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 68 | | | | 6,631 | |
Flexion Therapeutics Inc.(a)(b) | | | 156 | | | | 3,722 | |
G1 Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 88 | | | | 4,519 | |
Global Blood Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 220 | | | | 9,196 | |
Heron Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 328 | | | | 12,284 | |
Intra-Cellular Therapies Inc.(a) | | | 208 | | | | 4,175 | |
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 600 | | | | 11,568 | |
Johnson & Johnson | | | 3,740 | | | | 495,625 | |
Jounce Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 72 | | | | 508 | |
Keryx Biopharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 492 | | | | 2,086 | |
Kura Oncology Inc.(a) | | | 148 | | | | 3,004 | |
La Jolla Pharmaceutical Co.(a)(b) | | | 92 | | | | 3,042 | |
Lannett Co. Inc.(a) | | | 116 | | | | 1,479 | |
Madrigal Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 16 | | | | 4,113 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Pharmaceuticals (continued) | | | | | | | | |
MediciNova Inc.(a) | | | 164 | | | $ | 1,551 | |
Merck & Co. Inc. | | | 4,656 | | | | 306,691 | |
Mirati Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 155 | | | | 9,517 | |
Momenta Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 324 | | | | 9,590 | |
MyoKardia Inc.(a) | | | 140 | | | | 8,036 | |
Nektar Therapeutics(a) | | | 799 | | | | 42,027 | |
Neurocrine Biosciences Inc.(a) | | | 468 | | | | 47,029 | |
Pacira Pharmaceuticals Inc./DE(a) | | | 152 | | | | 6,110 | |
Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 124 | | | | 1,252 | |
Pfizer Inc. | | | 8,828 | | | | 352,502 | |
Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 356 | | | | 12,745 | |
PRA Health Sciences Inc.(a) | | | 84 | | | | 8,832 | |
Prestige Brands Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 64 | | | | 2,287 | |
Progenics Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 308 | | | | 2,459 | |
Reata Pharmaceuticals Inc. Series A(a) | | | 72 | | | | 5,048 | |
Revance Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 144 | | | | 4,140 | |
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 80 | | | | 2,483 | |
Rocket Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 105 | | | | 2,154 | |
Sarepta Therapeutics Inc.(a)(b) | | | 329 | | | | 38,243 | |
Sorrento Therapeutics Inc.(a)(b) | | | 276 | | | | 1,546 | |
Supernus Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 220 | | | | 11,649 | |
Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a)(b) | | | 1,136 | | | | 1,931 | |
TESARO Inc.(a) | | | 184 | | | | 6,409 | |
TG Therapeutics Inc.(a) | | | 236 | | | | 2,773 | |
TherapeuticsMD Inc.(a)(b) | | | 640 | | | | 3,341 | |
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.(a) | | | 224 | | | | 4,670 | |
Voyager Therapeutics Inc.(a)(b) | | | 128 | | | | 2,414 | |
Xencor Inc.(a) | | | 240 | | | | 8,933 | |
Zoetis Inc. | | | 816 | | | | 70,568 | |
Zogenix Inc.(a) | | | 152 | | | | 8,626 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 2,465,406 | |
Telecommunications — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
InterDigital Inc./PA | | | 36 | | | | 2,968 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Common Stocks — 99.2% (Cost: $4,910,224) | | | | 5,166,419 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Short-Term Investments | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Money Market Funds — 2.6% | | | | | | | | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Institutional, SL Agency Shares, | | | | | | | | |
2.14%(c)(d)(e) | | | 80,074 | | | | 80,097 | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares, 1.83%(c)(d) | | | 53,493 | | | | 53,493 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 133,590 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Short-Term Investments — 2.6% (Cost: $133,582) | | | | 133,590 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Investments in Securities — 101.8% (Cost: $5,043,806) | | | | 5,300,009 | |
| |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (1.8)% | | | | (94,468 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 5,205,541 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(b) | All or a portion of this security is on loan. |
(c) | Affiliate of the Fund. |
(d) | Annualized 7-day yield as of period-end. |
(e) | All or a portion of this security was purchased with cash collateral received from loaned securities. |
| | |
36 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | |
Affiliates
Investments in issuers considered to be affiliates of the Fund during the period ended July 31, 2018, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the 1940 Act, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated Issuer | |
| Shares Held at 03/21/18 | (a) | | | Net Activity | | |
| Shares Held at 07/31/18 | | |
| Value at 07/31/18 | | | | Income | | |
| Net Realized Gain (Loss) | (b) | |
| Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Institutional, SL Agency Shares | | | — | | | | 80,074 | | | | 80,074 | | | $ | 80,097 | | | $ | 172 | (c) | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 8 | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares | | | — | | | | 53,493 | | | | 53,493 | | | | 53,493 | | | | 276 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 133,590 | | | $ | 448 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (a) | The Fund commenced operations on March 21, 2018. |
| (b) | Includes realized capital gain distributions from an affiliated fund, if any. |
| (c) | Includes securities lending income earned from the reinvestment of cash collateral from loaned securities (excluding collateral investment fees), net of fees and other payments to and from borrowers of securities, and less fees paid to BTC as securities lending agent. |
Fair Value Measurements
Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of financial instruments. For description of the input levels and information about the Fund’s policy regarding valuation of financial instruments, refer to the Notes to Financial Statements.
The following table summarizes the value of the Fund’s investments according to the fair value hierarchy as of July 31, 2018. The breakdown of the Fund’s investments into major categories is disclosed in the Schedule of Investments above.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 5,162,035 | | | $ | 4,384 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,166,419 | |
Money Market Funds | | | 133,590 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 133,590 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 5,295,625 | | | $ | 4,384 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,300,009 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
S C H E D U L E O F I N V E S T M E N T S | | 37 |
| | |
Schedule of Investments | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Commercial Services — 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
Graham Holdings Co., Class B | | | 48 | | | $ | 26,832 | |
Viad Corp. | | | 64 | | | | 3,673 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 30,505 | |
Entertainment — 7.3% | | | | | | | | |
AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc., Class A | | | 440 | | | | 7,172 | |
Cinemark Holdings Inc. | | | 1,244 | | | | 44,684 | |
Dolby Laboratories Inc., Class A | | | 564 | | | | 36,350 | |
IMAX Corp.(a)(b) | | | 768 | | | | 16,973 | |
Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., Class A | | | 1,276 | | | | 30,433 | |
Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., Class B, NVS | | | 2,424 | | | | 55,437 | |
Live Nation Entertainment Inc.(a)(b) | | | 1,008 | | | | 49,674 | |
Madison Square Garden Co. (The), Class A(a) | | | 192 | | | | 59,938 | |
National CineMedia Inc. | | | 964 | | | | 7,963 | |
Reading International Inc., Class A, NVS(a) | | | 180 | | | | 2,844 | |
Scientific Games Corp./DE, Class A(a) | | | 324 | | | | 15,568 | |
SeaWorld Entertainment Inc.(a) | | | 476 | | | | 10,139 | |
Six Flags Entertainment Corp. | | | 748 | | | | 48,583 | |
Speedway Motorsports Inc. | | | 148 | | | | 2,612 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 388,370 | |
Internet — 7.5% | | | | | | | | |
IAC/InterActiveCorp.(a) | | | 464 | | | | 68,324 | |
Netflix Inc.(a) | | | 780 | | | | 263,211 | |
New Media Investment Group Inc. | | | 472 | | | | 8,491 | |
Pandora Media Inc.(a) | | | 2,064 | | | | 13,911 | |
Snap Inc., Class A, NVS(a) | | | 2,816 | | | | 35,200 | |
Twitter Inc.(a) | | | 188 | | | | 5,992 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 395,129 | |
Leisure Time — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Liberty TripAdvisor Holdings Inc., Class A(a)(b) | | | 212 | | | | 3,530 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Lodging — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Marcus Corp. (The) | | | 120 | | | | 4,626 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Media — 63.3% | | | | | | | | |
Altice USA Inc., Class A | | | 988 | | | | 16,924 | |
AMC Networks Inc., Class A(a)(b) | | | 864 | | | | 52,091 | |
Cable One Inc. | | | 48 | | | | 34,745 | |
CBS Corp., Class B, NVS | | | 4,932 | | | | 259,768 | |
Charter Communications Inc., Class A(a) | | | 756 | | | | 230,263 | |
Comcast Corp., Class A | | | 8,228 | | | | 294,398 | |
Daily Journal Corp.(a)(b) | | | 8 | | | | 1,878 | |
Discovery Inc., Class A(a) | | | 2,752 | | | | 73,148 | |
Discovery Inc., Class C, NVS(a) | | | 4,864 | | | | 119,411 | |
DISH Network Corp., Class A(a)(b) | | | 2,532 | | | | 79,910 | |
Entercom Communications Corp., Class A | | | 2,648 | | | | 19,992 | |
EW Scripps Co. (The), Class A, NVS | | | 1,376 | | | | 18,026 | |
Gannett Co. Inc. | | | 996 | | | | 10,528 | |
Gray Television Inc.(a) | | | 1,888 | | | | 29,170 | |
Hemisphere Media Group Inc.(a)(b) | | | 412 | | | | 4,944 | |
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Co.(a) | | | 516 | | | | 3,277 | |
Liberty Broadband Corp., Class A(a) | | | 288 | | | | 22,850 | |
Liberty Broadband Corp., Class C, NVS(a) | | | 1,156 | | | | 91,867 | |
Liberty Media Corp.-Liberty SiriusXM, Class A(a) | | | 1,284 | | | | 60,528 | |
Liberty Media Corp.-Liberty SiriusXM, Class C, NVS(a) | | | 2,576 | | | | 121,664 | |
Meredith Corp. | | | 760 | | | | 40,394 | |
MSG Networks Inc., Class A(a) | | | 1,052 | | | | 24,775 | |
New York Times Co. (The), Class A | | | 1,620 | | | | 40,176 | |
News Corp., Class A, NVS | | | 5,396 | | | | 81,318 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Media (continued) | | | | | | | | |
News Corp., Class B | | | 1,728 | | | $ | 26,438 | |
Nexstar Media Group Inc., Class A | | | 1,000 | | | | 74,450 | |
Saga Communications Inc., Class A | | | 108 | | | | 4,088 | |
Scholastic Corp., NVS | | | 216 | | | | 9,020 | |
Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc., Class A | | | 1,720 | | | | 44,376 | |
Sirius XM Holdings Inc.(b) | | | 14,272 | | | | 100,189 | |
TEGNA Inc. | | | 4,292 | | | | 47,341 | |
Tribune Media Co., Class A | | | 1,252 | | | | 42,380 | |
Twenty-First Century Fox Inc., Class A, NVS | | | 6,748 | | | | 303,660 | |
Twenty-First Century Fox Inc., Class B | | | 6,856 | | | | 304,544 | |
Viacom Inc., Class A | | | 220 | | | | 7,568 | |
Viacom Inc., Class B, NVS | | | 7,664 | | | | 222,639 | |
Walt Disney Co. (The) | | | 3,148 | | | | 357,487 | |
World Wrestling Entertainment Inc., Class A(b) | | | 848 | | | | 67,085 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 3,343,310 | |
Real Estate Investment Trusts — 0.8% | | | | | |
Lamar Advertising Co., Class A | | | 460 | | | | 33,870 | |
Ryman Hospitality Properties Inc. | | | 84 | | | | 7,141 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 41,011 | |
Software — 11.3% | | | | | | | | |
Activision Blizzard Inc. | | | 3,448 | | | | 253,152 | |
Electronic Arts Inc.(a) | | | 1,816 | | | | 233,810 | |
Glu Mobile Inc.(a) | | | 804 | | | | 4,285 | |
Take-Two Interactive Software Inc.(a) | | | 672 | | | | 75,950 | |
TiVo Corp. | | | 1,308 | | | | 15,892 | |
Zynga Inc., Class A(a) | | | 3,060 | | | | 11,597 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 594,686 | |
Telecommunications — 2.4% | | | | | | | | |
AT&T Inc. | | | 3,718 | | | | 118,865 | |
Harmonic Inc.(a)(b) | | | 464 | | | | 2,134 | |
Shenandoah Telecommunications Co. | | | 124 | | | | 4,092 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 125,091 | |
Toys, Games & Hobbies — 3.2% | | | | | | | | |
Hasbro Inc. | | | 1,312 | | | | 130,688 | |
Mattel Inc. | | | 2,408 | | | | 38,215 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 168,903 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Common Stocks — 96.6% (Cost: $4,818,270) | | | | 5,095,161 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Short-Term Investments | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Money Market Funds — 10.6% | | | | | | | | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Institutional, SL Agency Shares, | | | | | | | | |
2.14%(c)(d)(e) | | | 381,922 | | | | 382,037 | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares, | | | | | | | | |
1.83%(c)(d) | | | 178,979 | | | | 178,979 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 561,016 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Short-Term Investments — 10.6% (Cost: $560,978) | | | | 561,016 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Investments in Securities — 107.2% (Cost: $5,379,248) | | | | 5,656,177 | |
| |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (7.2)% | | | | (379,379 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 5,276,798 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(b) | All or a portion of this security is on loan. |
| | |
38 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | |
(c) | Affiliate of the Fund. |
(d) | Annualized 7-day yield as of period-end. |
(e) | All or a portion of this security was purchased with cash collateral received from loaned securities. |
Affiliates
Investments in issuers considered to be affiliates of the Fund during the period ended July 31, 2018, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the 1940 Act, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated Issuer | |
| Shares Held at 03/21/18 | (a) | | | Net Activity | | |
| Shares Held at 07/31/18 | | |
| Value at 07/31/18 | | | | Income | | |
| Net Realized Gain (Loss) | (b) | |
| Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Institutional, SL Agency Shares | | | — | | | | 381,922 | | | | 381,922 | | | $ | 382,037 | | | $ | 305 | (c) | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 38 | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares | | | — | | | | 178,979 | | | | 178,979 | | | | 178,979 | | | | 564 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 561,016 | | | $ | 869 | | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 38 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (a) | The Fund commenced operations on March 21, 2018. |
| (b) | Includes realized capital gain distributions from an affiliated fund, if any. |
| (c) | Includes securities lending income earned from the reinvestment of cash collateral from loaned securities (excluding collateral investment fees), net of fees and other payments to and from borrowers of securities, and less fees paid to BTC as securities lending agent. |
Fair Value Measurements
Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of financial instruments. For description of the input levels and information about the Fund’s policy regarding valuation of financial instruments, refer to the Notes to Financial Statements.
The following table summarizes the value of the Fund’s investments according to the fair value hierarchy as of July 31, 2018. The breakdown of the Fund’s investments into major categories is disclosed in the Schedule of Investments above.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 5,095,161 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,095,161 | |
Money Market Funds | | | 561,016 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 561,016 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 5,656,177 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,656,177 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
S C H E D U L E O F I N V E S T M E N T S | | 39 |
| | |
Schedule of Investments | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Technology ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Advertising — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Interpublic Group of Companies Inc. (The) | | | 212 | | | $ | 4,781 | |
Omnicom Group Inc. | | | 116 | | | | 7,984 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 12,765 | |
Aerospace & Defense — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Northrop Grumman Corp. | | | 16 | | | | 4,808 | |
Raytheon Co. | | | 24 | | | | 4,753 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 9,561 | |
Auto Parts & Equiptment — 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Lear Corp. | | | 12 | | | | 2,162 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Banks — 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
JPMorgan Chase &Co. | | | 156 | | | | 17,932 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Biotechnology — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Incyte Corp.(a) | | | 40 | | | | 2,662 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Commercial Services — 4.3% | | | | | | | | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc. | | | 224 | | | | 30,238 | |
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. | | | 60 | | | | 2,836 | |
CoreLogic Inc./U.S.(a) | | | 36 | | | | 1,753 | |
CoStar Group Inc.(a) | | | 16 | | | | 6,654 | |
Deluxe Corp. | | | 28 | | | | 1,650 | |
Equifax Inc. | | | 56 | | | | 7,028 | |
Euronet Worldwide Inc.(a) | | | 20 | | | | 1,839 | |
FleetCor Technologies Inc.(a) | | | 40 | | | | 8,680 | |
Gartner Inc.(a)(b) | | | 64 | | | | 8,668 | |
Global Payments Inc. | | | 76 | | | | 8,555 | |
Korn/Ferry International | | | 32 | | | | 2,111 | |
ManpowerGroup Inc. | | | 28 | | | | 2,611 | |
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. | | | 16 | | | | 3,100 | |
Moody’s Corp. | | | 52 | | | | 8,898 | |
PayPal Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 676 | | | | 55,527 | |
Robert Half International Inc. | | | 44 | | | | 3,334 | |
S&P Global Inc. | | | 96 | | | | 19,242 | |
Sabre Corp. | | | 124 | | | | 3,053 | |
Square Inc., Class A(a) | | | 164 | | | | 10,603 | |
Total System Services Inc. | | | 68 | | | | 6,225 | |
TransUnion | | | 96 | | | | 6,950 | |
Verisk Analytics Inc.(a) | | | 60 | | | | 6,637 | |
Western Union Co. (The) | | | 156 | | | | 3,145 | |
WEX Inc.(a) | | | 16 | | | | 3,037 | |
Worldpay Inc., Class A(a) | | | 152 | | | | 12,493 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 224,867 | |
Computers — 15.8% | | | | | | | | |
Apple Inc. | | | 2,964 | | | | 564,020 | |
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., Class A | | | 400 | | | | 32,600 | |
Conduent Inc.(a) | | | 100 | | | | 1,796 | |
Dell Technologies Inc., Class V(a) | | | 156 | | | | 14,433 | |
EPAM Systems Inc.(a) | | | 32 | | | | 4,167 | |
Fortinet Inc.(a) | | | 128 | | | | 8,052 | |
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. | | | 1,272 | | | | 19,640 | |
HP Inc. | | | 776 | | | | 17,910 | |
International Business Machines Corp. | | | 832 | | | | 120,582 | |
Lumentum Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 24 | | | | 1,254 | |
NCR Corp.(a) | | | 64 | | | | 1,787 | |
NetApp Inc. | | | 240 | | | | 18,605 | |
NetScout Systems Inc.(a) | | | 68 | | | | 1,822 | |
Nutanix Inc., Class A(a)(b) | | | 88 | | | | 4,302 | |
Pure Storage Inc., Class A(a) | | | 88 | | | | 1,906 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Computers (continued) | | | | | | | | |
Qualys Inc.(a) | | | 32 | | | $ | 2,787 | |
Teradata Corp.(a) | | | 96 | | | | 3,676 | |
Western Digital Corp. | | | 192 | | | | 13,469 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 832,808 | |
Distribution & Wholesale — 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
KAR Auction Services Inc. | | | 36 | | | | 2,140 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Diversified Financial Services — 5.9% | | | | | |
Alliance Data Systems Corp. | | | 20 | | | | 4,498 | |
Cboe Global Markets Inc. | | | 40 | | | | 3,885 | |
CME Group Inc. | | | 120 | | | | 19,094 | |
Discover Financial Services | | | 32 | | | | 2,285 | |
Ellie Mae Inc.(a)(b) | | | 28 | | | | 2,778 | |
Interactive Brokers Group Inc., Class A | | | 24 | | | | 1,437 | |
Intercontinental Exchange Inc. | | | 232 | | | | 17,147 | |
Mastercard Inc., Class A | | | 512 | | | | 101,376 | |
Nasdaq Inc. | | | 44 | | | | 4,022 | |
SEI Investments Co. | | | 48 | | | | 2,877 | |
TD Ameritrade Holding Corp. | | | 84 | | | | 4,801 | |
Visa Inc., Class A | | | 1,052 | | | | 143,850 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 308,050 | |
Electronics — 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
Agilent Technologies Inc. | | | 80 | | | | 5,283 | |
Arrow Electronics Inc.(a) | | | 32 | | | | 2,427 | |
Avnet Inc. | | | 60 | | | | 2,631 | |
Coherent Inc.(a) | | | 8 | | | | 1,264 | |
Jabil Inc. | | | 60 | | | | 1,690 | |
Keysight Technologies Inc.(a) | | | 84 | | | | 4,872 | |
Mettler-Toledo International Inc.(a) | | | 4 | | | | 2,370 | |
National Instruments Corp. | | | 76 | | | | 3,330 | |
SYNNEX Corp. | | | 16 | | | | 1,544 | |
Tech Data Corp.(a) | | | 24 | | | | 2,002 | |
Trimble Inc.(a) | | | 104 | | | | 3,671 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 31,084 | |
Health Care - Products — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Align Technology Inc.(a)(b) | | | 28 | | | | 9,986 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Health Care - Services — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
IQVIA Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 44 | | | | 5,365 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Insurance — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc. | | | 108 | | | | 9,003 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Internet — 29.1% | | | | | | | | |
Alphabet Inc., Class A(a) | | | 232 | | | | 284,715 | |
Alphabet Inc., Class C,NVS(a) | | | 236 | | | | 287,273 | |
Amazon.com Inc.(a) | | | 232 | | | | 412,366 | |
Booking Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 20 | | | | 40,574 | |
CDW Corp./DE | | | 88 | | | | 7,400 | |
eBay Inc.(a) | | | 680 | | | | 22,746 | |
Expedia Group Inc. | | | 52 | | | | 6,960 | |
F5 Networks Inc.(a) | | | 52 | | | | 8,912 | |
Facebook Inc., Class A(a) | | | 1,864 | | | | 321,689 | |
FireEye Inc.(a) | | | 124 | | | | 1,926 | |
GoDaddy Inc., Class A(a) | | | 92 | | | | 6,773 | |
GrubHub Inc.(a) | | | 36 | | | | 4,388 | |
IAC/InterActiveCorp.(a) | | | 36 | | | | 5,301 | |
MercadoLibre Inc. | | | 24 | | | | 8,230 | |
Netflix Inc.(a) | | | 96 | | | | 32,395 | |
Okta Inc.(a)(b) | | | 40 | | | | 1,986 | |
Palo Alto Networks Inc.(a) | | | 80 | | | | 15,861 | |
| | |
40 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Technology ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| |
Internet (continued) | | | | | |
Proofpoint Inc.(a) | | | 44 | | | $ | 5,018 | |
RingCentral Inc., Class A(a) | | | 44 | | | | 3,245 | |
Snap Inc., Class A, NVS(a)(b) | | | 268 | | | | 3,350 | |
Stamps.com Inc.(a) | | | 12 | | | | 3,132 | |
Symantec Corp. | | | 396 | | | | 8,007 | |
TripAdvisor Inc.(a)(b) | | | 48 | | | | 2,784 | |
Twilio Inc., Class A(a) | | | 52 | | | | 3,010 | |
Twitter Inc.(a) | | | 496 | | | | 15,808 | |
VeriSign Inc.(a) | | | 56 | | | | 8,133 | |
Wayfair Inc., Class A(a) | | | 24 | | | | 2,612 | |
Yelp Inc.(a) | | | 48 | | | | 1,770 | |
Zendesk Inc.(a) | | | 68 | | | | 3,704 | |
Zillow Group Inc., Class A(a) | | | 28 | | | | 1,578 | |
Zillow Group Inc., Class C, NVS(a) | | | 56 | | | | 3,119 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 1,534,765 | |
Machinery — 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Cognex Corp. | | | 80 | | | | 4,222 | |
Rockwell Automation Inc. | | | 16 | | | | 3,001 | |
Roper Technologies Inc. | | | 16 | | | | 4,831 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 12,054 | |
Media — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
FactSet Research Systems Inc. | | | 20 | | | | 4,027 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Office & Business Equipment — 0.1% | | | | | |
Xerox Corp. | | | 112 | | | | 2,908 | |
Zebra Technologies Corp., Class A(a) | | | 32 | | | | 4,414 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 7,322 | |
Pharmaceuticals — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
McKesson Corp. | | | 28 | | | | 3,517 | |
Zoetis Inc. | | | 36 | | | | 3,113 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 6,630 | |
Real Estate — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. | | | 16 | | | | 2,736 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Real Estate Investment Trusts — 0.3% | | | | | |
Equinix Inc. | | | 32 | | | | 14,057 | |
Iron Mountain Inc. | | | 108 | | | | 3,792 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 17,849 | |
Retail — 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Best Buy Co. Inc. | | | 56 | | | | 4,201 | |
Copart Inc.(a) | | | 48 | | | | 2,755 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 6,956 | |
Semiconductors — 9.3% | | | | | | | | |
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.(a)(b) | | | 680 | | | | 12,464 | |
Analog Devices Inc. | | | 148 | | | | 14,229 | |
Applied Materials Inc. | | | 408 | | | | 19,841 | |
Cypress Semiconductor Corp. | | | 216 | | | | 3,847 | |
Integrated Device Technology Inc.(a) | | | 60 | | | | 2,066 | |
Intel Corp. | | | 2,016 | | | | 96,970 | |
IPG Photonics Corp.(a) | | | 8 | | | | 1,312 | |
KLA-Tencor Corp. | | | 80 | | | | 9,394 | |
Lam Research Corp. | | | 64 | | | | 12,201 | |
Marvell Technology Group Ltd. | | | 104 | | | | 2,216 | |
Maxim Integrated Products Inc. | | | 164 | | | | 10,027 | |
Microchip Technology Inc. | | | 128 | | | | 11,959 | |
Micron Technology Inc.(a) | | | 556 | | | | 29,351 | |
Monolithic Power Systems Inc. | | | 24 | | | | 3,184 | |
NVIDIA Corp. | | | 468 | | | | 114,594 | |
ON Semiconductor Corp.(a) | | | 184 | | | | 4,057 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| |
Semiconductors (continued) | | | | | |
Qorvo Inc.(a) | | | 56 | | | $ | 4,579 | |
QUALCOMM Inc. | | | 872 | | | | 55,886 | |
Silicon Laboratories Inc.(a) | | | 28 | | | | 2,667 | |
Skyworks Solutions Inc. | | | 96 | | | | 9,080 | |
Teradyne Inc. | | | 92 | | | | 3,979 | |
Texas Instruments Inc. | | | 468 | | | | 52,098 | |
Xilinx Inc. | | | 168 | | | | 12,108 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 488,109 | |
Software — 27.6% | | | | | | | | |
2U Inc.(a) | | | 28 | | | | 2,119 | |
ACI Worldwide Inc.(a) | | | 80 | | | | 2,067 | |
Activision Blizzard Inc. | | | 284 | | | | 20,851 | |
Acxiom Corp.(a) | | | 52 | | | | 2,108 | |
Adobe Systems Inc.(a) | | | 392 | | | | 95,915 | |
Akamai Technologies Inc.(a) | | | 120 | | | | 9,031 | |
ANSYS Inc.(a) | | | 56 | | | | 9,457 | |
Aspen Technology Inc.(a) | | | 40 | | | | 3,832 | |
athenahealth Inc.(a) | | | 16 | | | | 2,411 | |
Autodesk Inc.(a) | | | 148 | | | | 19,009 | |
Black Knight Inc.(a) | | | 56 | | | | 2,892 | |
Blackbaud Inc. | | | 36 | | | | 3,593 | |
Box Inc., Class A(a) | | | 108 | | | | 2,588 | |
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. | | | 56 | | | | 6,327 | |
CA Inc. | | | 284 | | | | 12,556 | |
Cadence Design Systems Inc.(a) | | | 196 | | | | 8,642 | |
CDK Global Inc. | | | 76 | | | | 4,746 | |
Cerner Corp.(a) | | | 116 | | | | 7,201 | |
Citrix Systems Inc.(a) | | | 112 | | | | 12,317 | |
Cloudera Inc.(a) | | | 92 | | | | 1,232 | |
CommVault Systems Inc.(a) | | | 36 | | | | 2,336 | |
Cornerstone OnDemand Inc.(a) | | | 48 | | | | 2,371 | |
Dun & Bradstreet Corp. (The) | | | 28 | | | | 3,525 | |
Electronic Arts Inc.(a) | | | 148 | | | | 19,055 | |
Fair Isaac Corp.(a) | | | 20 | | | | 4,029 | |
Fidelity National Information Services Inc. | | | 152 | | | | 15,676 | |
First Data Corp., Class A(a) | | | 220 | | | | 5,117 | |
Fiserv Inc.(a) | | | 244 | | | | 18,417 | |
Guidewire Software Inc.(a) | | | 52 | | | | 4,482 | |
HubSpot Inc.(a) | | | 28 | | | | 3,475 | |
Intuit Inc. | | | 160 | | | | 32,678 | |
j2 Global Inc. | | | 28 | | | | 2,376 | |
Jack Henry & Associates Inc. | | | 48 | | | | 6,466 | |
Manhattan Associates Inc.(a) | | | 52 | | | | 2,502 | |
Medidata Solutions Inc.(a) | | | 40 | | | | 2,972 | |
Microsoft Corp. | | | 6,576 | | | | 697,582 | |
MSCI Inc. | | | 48 | | | | 7,977 | |
New Relic Inc.(a) | | | 36 | | | | 3,517 | |
Nuance Communications Inc.(a) | | | 216 | | | | 3,190 | |
Oracle Corp. | | | 3,020 | | | | 143,994 | |
Paycom Software Inc.(a)(b) | | | 36 | | | | 3,825 | |
Pegasystems Inc. | | | 32 | | | | 1,779 | |
Progress Software Corp. | | | 44 | | | | 1,619 | |
PTC Inc.(a) | | | 96 | | | | 8,823 | |
RealPage Inc.(a) | | | 36 | | | | 1,984 | |
Red Hat Inc.(a) | | | 160 | | | | 22,597 | |
salesforce.com Inc.(a) | | | 627 | | | | 85,993 | |
ServiceNow Inc.(a) | | | 156 | | | | 27,450 | |
Splunk Inc.(a) | | | 124 | | | | 11,916 | |
SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc. | | | 104 | | | | 5,519 | |
Synopsys Inc.(a) | | | 112 | | | | 10,016 | |
| | |
S C H E D U L E O F I N V E S T M E N T S | | 41 |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Technology ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| |
Software (continued) | | | | | |
Tableau Software Inc., Class A(a) | | | 60 | | | $ | 6,184 | |
Take-Two Interactive Software Inc.(a) | | | 52 | | | | 5,877 | |
Tyler Technologies Inc.(a) | | | 24 | | | | 5,400 | |
Ultimate Software Group Inc. (The)(a) | | | 24 | | | | 6,645 | |
Veeva Systems Inc., Class A(a) | | | 88 | | | | 6,656 | |
Verint Systems Inc.(a) | | | 48 | | | | 2,155 | |
VMware Inc., Class A(a) | | | 64 | | | | 9,254 | |
Workday Inc., Class A(a) | | | 128 | | | | 15,875 | |
Zynga Inc., Class A(a) | | | 436 | | | | 1,653 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 1,451,851 | |
Telecommunications — 3.9% | | | | | | | | |
Arista Networks Inc.(a) | | | 48 | | | | 12,275 | |
Ciena Corp.(a) | | | 96 | | | | 2,438 | |
Cisco Systems Inc. | | | 3,900 | | | | 164,931 | |
CommScope Holding Co. Inc.(a) | | | 64 | | | | 2,055 | |
Juniper Networks Inc. | | | 284 | | | | 7,481 | |
LogMeIn Inc. | | | 40 | | | | 3,242 | |
Motorola Solutions Inc. | | | 64 | | | | 7,763 | |
Zayo Group Holdings Inc.(a) | | | 68 | | | | 2,522 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 202,707 | |
Transportation — 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Expeditors International of Washington Inc. | | | 52 | | | | 3,961 | |
FedEx Corp. | | | 20 | | | | 4,917 | |
United Parcel Service Inc., Class B | | | 76 | | | | 9,112 | |
XPO Logistics Inc.(a) | | | 16 | | | | 1,596 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 19,586 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Common Stocks ��� 99.2% (Cost: $4,866,527) | | | | 5,222,977 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | |
| | |
Short-Term Investments | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Money Market Funds — 1.8% | | | | | | | | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Institutional, SL Agency Shares, 2.14%(c)(d)(e) | | | 51,044 | | | $ | 51,059 | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares, 1.83%(c)(d) | | | 43,533 | | | | 43,533 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 94,592 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Short-Term Investments — 1.8% (Cost: $94,589) | | | | 94,592 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Investments in Securities — 101.0% (Cost: $4,961,116) | | | | 5,317,569 | |
| |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (1.0)% | | | | (51,297 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 5,266,272 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(b) | All or a portion of this security is on loan. |
(c) | Affiliate of the Fund. |
(d) | Annualized 7-day yield as of period-end. |
(e) | All or a portion of this security was purchased with cash collateral received from loaned securities. |
Affiliates
Investments in issuers considered to be affiliates of the Fund during the period ended July 31, 2018, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the 1940 Act, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated Issuer | |
| Shares Held at 03/21/18 | (a) | | | Net Activity | | |
| Shares Held at 07/31/18 | | |
| Value at 07/31/18 | | | | Income | | |
| Net Realized Gain (Loss) | (b) | |
| Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Institutional, SL Agency Shares | | | — | | | | 51,044 | | | | 51,044 | | | $ | 51,059 | | | $ | 22 | (c) | | $ | — | | | $ | 3 | |
BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares | | | — | | | | 43,533 | | | | 43,533 | | | | 43,533 | | | | 238 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 94,592 | | | $ | 260 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (a) | The Fund commenced operations on March 21, 2018. |
| (b) | Includes realized capital gain distributions from an affiliated fund, if any. |
| (c) | Includes securities lending income earned from the reinvestment of cash collateral from loaned securities (excluding collateral investment fees), net of fees and other payments to and from borrowers of securities, and less fees paid to BTC as securities lending agent. |
Fair Value Measurements
Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of financial instruments. For description of the input levels and information about the Fund’s policy regarding valuation of financial instruments, refer to the Notes to Financial Statements.
| | |
42 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Schedule of Investments (continued) | | iShares® Evolved U.S. Technology ETF |
July 31, 2018 | | |
Fair Value Measurements (continued)
The following table summarizes the value of the Fund’s investments according to the fair value hierarchy as of July 31, 2018. The breakdown of the Fund’s investments into major categories is disclosed in the Schedule of Investments above.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 5,222,977 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,222,977 | |
Money Market Funds | | | 94,592 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 94,592 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 5,317,569 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,317,569 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
S C H E D U L E O F I N V E S T M E N T S | | 43 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
July 31, 2018
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | iShares Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF | | iShares Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF | | iShares Evolved U.S. Financials ETF | | iShares Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF |
| | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in securities, at value (including securities on loan)(a): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unaffiliated(b) | | | $ | 3,551,047 | | | | $ | 5,336,661 | | | | $ | 4,862,674 | | | | $ | 5,446,087 | |
Affiliated(c) | | | | 210,374 | | | | | 58,999 | | | | | 39,373 | | | | | 50,730 | |
Receivables: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities lending income — Affiliated | | | | 8 | | | | | 36 | | | | | — | | | | | 16 | |
Dividends | | | | 4,649 | | | | | 3,999 | | | | | 3,145 | | | | | 3,680 | |
Other assets | | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 14,501 | | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | | 3,766,078 | | | | | 5,399,695 | | | | | 4,919,693 | | | | | 5,500,513 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collateral on securities loaned, at value | | | | 10,253 | | | | | 29,999 | | | | | — | | | | | 4,309 | |
Payables: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment advisory fees | | | | 585 | | | | | 816 | | | | | 740 | | | | | 830 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | | 10,838 | | | | | 30,815 | | | | | 740 | | | | | 5,139 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
NET ASSETS | | | $ | 3,755,240 | | | | $ | 5,368,880 | | | | $ | 4,918,953 | | | | $ | 5,495,374 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
NET ASSETS CONSIST OF: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | $ | 3,703,772 | | | | $ | 4,956,981 | | | | $ | 4,938,160 | | | | $ | 4,960,601 | |
Undistributed net investment income | | | | 25,529 | | | | | 3,903 | | | | | 6,588 | | | | | 4,865 | |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) | | | | 8,485 | | | | | 465 | | | | | (21,490 | ) | | | | (13 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | | 17,454 | | | | | 407,531 | | | | | (4,305 | ) | | | | 529,921 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET ASSETS | | | $ | 3,755,240 | | | | $ | 5,368,880 | | | | $ | 4,918,953 | | | | $ | 5,495,374 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares outstanding | | | | 150,000 | | | | | 200,000 | | | | | 200,000 | | | | | 200,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value | | | $ | 25.03 | | | | $ | 26.84 | | | | $ | 24.59 | | | | $ | 27.48 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares authorized | | | | Unlimited | | | | | Unlimited | | | | | Unlimited | | | | | Unlimited | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Par value | | | | None | | | | | None | | | | | None | | | | | None | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
(a) Securities loaned, at value | | | $ | 9,953 | | | | $ | 29,529 | | | | $ | — | | | | $ | 4,237 | |
(b) Investments, at cost — Unaffiliated | | | $ | 3,533,593 | | | | $ | 4,929,133 | | | | $ | 4,866,979 | | | | $ | 4,916,167 | |
(c) Investments, at cost — Affiliated | | | $ | 210,374 | | | | $ | 58,996 | | | | $ | 39,373 | | | | $ | 50,729 | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
44 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities (continued)
July 31, 2018
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | iShares Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF | | iShares Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment ETF | | iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF |
| | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in securities, at value (including securities on loan)(a): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unaffiliated(b) | | | $ | 5,166,419 | | | | $ | 5,095,161 | | | | $ | 5,222,977 | |
Affiliated(c) | | | | 133,590 | | | | | 561,016 | | | | | 94,592 | |
Receivables: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments sold | | | | 131,020 | | | | | — | | | | | — | |
Securities lending income — Affiliated | | | | 76 | | | | | 108 | | | | | 17 | |
Dividends | | | | 5,002 | | | | | 3,325 | | | | | 558 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | | 5,436,107 | | | | | 5,659,610 | | | | | 5,318,144 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collateral on securities loaned, at value | | | | 80,086 | | | | | 381,983 | | | | | 51,056 | |
Payables: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments purchased | | | | 149,697 | | | | | — | | | | | — | |
Investment advisory fees | | | | 783 | | | | | 829 | | | | | 816 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | | 230,566 | | | | | 382,812 | | | | | 51,872 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
NET ASSETS | | | $ | 5,205,541 | | | | $ | 5,276,798 | | | | $ | 5,266,272 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
NET ASSETS CONSIST OF: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | $ | 4,918,256 | | | | $ | 4,979,943 | | | | $ | 4,907,809 | |
Undistributed net investment income | | | | 4,177 | | | | | 6,833 | | | | | 1,866 | |
Accumulated net realized gain | | | | 26,905 | | | | | 13,093 | | | | | 144 | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | | 256,203 | | | | | 276,929 | | | | | 356,453 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET ASSETS | | | $ | 5,205,541 | | | | $ | 5,276,798 | | | | $ | 5,266,272 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Shares outstanding | | | | 200,000 | | | | | 200,000 | | | | | 200,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value | | | $ | 26.03 | | | | $ | 26.38 | | | | $ | 26.33 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares authorized | | | | Unlimited | | | | | Unlimited | | | | | Unlimited | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Par value | | | | None | | | | | None | | | | | None | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
(a) Securities loaned, at value | | | $ | 79,272 | | | | $ | 378,408 | | | | $ | 49,646 | |
(b) Investments, at cost — Unaffiliated | | | $ | 4,910,224 | | | | $ | 4,818,270 | | | | $ | 4,866,527 | |
(c) Investments, at cost — Affiliated | | | $ | 133,582 | | | | $ | 560,978 | | | | $ | 94,589 | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S | | 45 |
Statements of Operations
Period Ended July 31, 2018
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | iShares | | | | iShares | | | | iShares | | | | iShares | |
| | | Evolved | | | | Evolved | | | | Evolved | | | | Evolved | |
| | | U.S. Consumer | | | | U.S. Discretionary | | | | U.S. Financials | | | | U.S. Healthcare | |
| | | Staples ETF | (a) | | | Spending ETF | (a) | | | ETF | (a) | | | Staples ETF | (a) |
| |
| | | | |
INVESTMENT INCOME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends — Unaffiliated | | $ | 60,274 | (b) | | $ | 25,645 | | | $ | 31,112 | | | $ | 19,030 | |
Dividends — Affiliated | | | 581 | | | | 178 | | | | 218 | | | | 230 | |
Securities lending income — Affiliated — net | | | 8 | | | | 57 | | | | — | | | | 25 | |
Foreign taxes withheld | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment income | | | 60,863 | | | | 25,880 | | | | 31,326 | | | | 19,285 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment advisory fees | | | 2,911 | | | | 3,261 | | | | 3,081 | | | | 3,292 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 2,911 | | | | 3,261 | | | | 3,081 | | | | 3,292 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 57,952 | | | | 22,619 | | | | 28,245 | | | | 15,993 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments — Unaffiliated | | | 10,971 | | | | 464 | | | | (21,490 | ) | | | (13 | ) |
Investments — Affiliated | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | — | |
In-kind redemptions — Unaffiliated | | | (10,151 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) | | | 820 | | | | 465 | | | | (21,490 | ) | | | (13 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments — Unaffiliated | | | 17,454 | | | | 407,528 | | | | (4,305 | ) | | | 529,920 | |
Investments — Affiliated | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | — | | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | 17,454 | | | | 407,531 | | | | (4,305 | ) | | | 529,921 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 18,274 | | | | 407,996 | | | | (25,795 | ) | | | 529,908 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | | $ | 76,226 | | | $ | 430,615 | | | $ | 2,450 | | | $ | 545,901 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) | For the period from March 21, 2018 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2018. |
(b) | Includes $19,293 related to a special distribution from Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc. |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
46 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Statements of Operations (continued)
Period Ended July 31, 2018
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | iShares | | | | |
| | | iShares | | | | Evolved | | | | iShares | |
| | | Evolved | | | | U.S. Media and | | | | Evolved | |
| | | U.S. Innovative | | | | Entertainment | | | | U.S. Technology | |
| | | Healthcare ETF | (a) | | | ETF | (a) | | | ETF | (a) |
| |
| | | |
INVESTMENT INCOME | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends — Unaffiliated | | $ | 24,235 | | | $ | 21,015 | | | $ | 15,531 | |
Dividends — Affiliated | | | 276 | | | | 564 | | | | 238 | |
Securities lending income — Affiliated — net | | | 172 | | | | 305 | | | | 22 | |
Foreign taxes withheld | | | — | | | | (87 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment income | | | 24,683 | | | | 21,797 | | | | 15,791 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment advisory fees | | | 3,101 | | | | 3,229 | | | | 3,233 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 3,101 | | | | 3,229 | | | | 3,233 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 21,582 | | | | 18,568 | | | | 12,558 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) from: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments — Unaffiliated | | | 26,901 | | | | 13,077 | | | | 144 | |
Investments — Affiliated | | | 4 | | | | 16 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gain | | | 26,905 | | | | 13,093 | | | | 144 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments — Unaffiliated | | | 256,195 | | | | 276,891 | | | | 356,450 | |
Investments — Affiliated | | | 8 | | | | 38 | | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | 256,203 | | | | 276,929 | | | | 356,453 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | | 283,108 | | | | 290,022 | | | | 356,597 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | | $ | 304,690 | | | $ | 308,590 | | | $ | 369,155 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) | For the period from March 21, 2018 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2018. |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S | | 47 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | iShares Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF | | | iShares Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF | | | iShares Evolved U.S. Financials ETF | | | iShares Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Period From | | | Period From | | | Period From | | | Period From | |
| | | 03/21/18 | (a) | | | 03/21/18 | (a) | | | 03/21/18 | (a) | | | 03/21/18 | (a) |
| | | to 07/31/18 | | | | to 07/31/18 | | | | to 07/31/18 | | | | to 07/31/18 | |
| |
| | | | |
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
OPERATIONS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 57,952 | | | $ | 22,619 | | | $ | 28,245 | | | $ | 15,993 | |
Net realized gain (loss) | | | 820 | | | | 465 | | | | (21,490 | ) | | | (13 | ) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | 17,454 | | | | 407,531 | | | | (4,305 | ) | | | 529,921 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | | | 76,226 | | | | 430,615 | | | | 2,450 | | | | 545,901 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | (32,423 | ) | | | (18,716 | ) | | | (21,657 | ) | | | (11,128 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Decrease in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders | | | (32,423 | ) | | | (18,716 | ) | | | (21,657 | ) | | | (11,128 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets derived from capital share transactions | | | 3,711,437 | | | | 4,956,981 | | | | 4,938,160 | | | | 4,960,601 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
NET ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total increase in net assets | | | 3,755,240 | | | | 5,368,880 | | | | 4,918,953 | | | | 5,495,374 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
End of period | | $ | 3,755,240 | | | $ | 5,368,880 | | | $ | 4,918,953 | | | $ | 5,495,374 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Undistributed net investment income included in net assets at end of period | | $ | 25,529 | | | $ | 3,903 | | | $ | 6,588 | | | $ | 4,865 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) | Commencement of operations. |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
48 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | iShares Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF | | | iShares Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment ETF | | | iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Period From | | | | Period From | | | | Period From | |
| | | 03/21/18 | (a) | | | 03/21/18 | (a) | | | 03/21/18 | (a) |
| | | to 07/31/18 | | | | to 07/31/18 | | | | to 07/31/18 | |
| |
| | | |
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
OPERATIONS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 21,582 | | | $ | 18,568 | | | $ | 12,558 | |
Net realized gain | | | 26,905 | | | | 13,093 | | | | 144 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | 256,203 | | | | 276,929 | | | | 356,453 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | | | 304,690 | | | | 308,590 | | | | 369,155 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | (17,405 | ) | | | (11,735 | ) | | | (10,692 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Decrease in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders | | | (17,405 | ) | | | (11,735 | ) | | | (10,692 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets derived from capital share transactions | | | 4,918,256 | | | | 4,979,943 | | | | 4,907,809 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
NET ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total increase in net assets | | | 5,205,541 | | | | 5,276,798 | | | | 5,266,272 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
End of period | | $ | 5,205,541 | | | $ | 5,276,798 | | | $ | 5,266,272 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Undistributed net investment income included in net assets at end of period | | $ | 4,177 | | | $ | 6,833 | | | $ | 1,866 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) | Commencement of operations. |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S | | 49 |
| | |
Financial Highlights | | |
(For a share outstanding throughout the period) | | |
| | | | |
| |
| iShares Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF | |
| | | | |
| | | Period From | |
| | | 03/21/18 | (a) |
| | | to 07/31/18 | |
| |
| | | | |
| |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $ | 24.62 | |
| | | | |
Net investment income(b) | | | 0.31 | (c) |
Net realized and unrealized gain(d) | | | 0.26 | |
| | | | |
Net increase from investment operations | | | 0.57 | |
| | | | |
| |
Distributions(e) | | | | |
From net investment income | | | (0.16 | ) |
| | | | |
Total distributions | | | (0.16 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 25.03 | |
| | | | |
| |
Total Return | | | | |
Based on net asset value | | | 2.34 | %(f) |
| | | | |
| |
Ratios to Average Net Assets | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 0.18 | %(g) |
| | | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.58 | %(c)(g) |
| | | | |
| |
Supplemental Data | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000) | | $ | 3,755 | |
| | | | |
Portfolio turnover rate(h) | | | 0 | %(f) |
| | | | |
(a) | Commencement of operations. |
(b) | Based on average shares outstanding. |
(c) | Includes a special distribution from Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc. Excluding such special distribution, the net investment income would have been $0.21 per share and 2.39% of average net assets. |
(d) | The amount reported for a share outstanding may not accord with the change in aggregate gains and losses in securities for the fiscal period due to the timing of capital share transactions in relation to the fluctuating market values of the Fund’s underlying securities. |
(e) | Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations. |
(h) | Portfolio turnover rate excludes in-kind transactions. |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
50 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Financial Highlights (continued) | | |
(For a share outstanding throughout the period) | | |
| | | | |
| |
| iShares
Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF |
|
| | | | |
| | | Period From | |
| | | 03/21/18 | (a) |
| | | to 07/31/18 | |
| |
| | | | |
| |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $ | 24.95 | |
| | | | |
Net investment income(b) | | | 0.12 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain(c) | | | 1.86 | |
| | | | |
Net increase from investment operations | | | 1.98 | |
| | | | |
| |
Distributions(d) | | | | |
From net investment income | | | (0.09 | ) |
| | | | |
Total distributions | | | (0.09 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 26.84 | |
| | | | |
| |
Total Return | | | | |
Based on net asset value | | | 7.96 | %(e) |
| | | | |
| |
Ratios to Average Net Assets | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 0.18 | %(f) |
| | | | |
Net investment income | | | 1.25 | %(f) |
| | | | |
| |
Supplemental Data | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000) | | $ | 5,369 | |
| | | | |
Portfolio turnover rate(g) | | | 0 | %(e) |
| | | | |
(a) | Commencement of operations. |
(b) | Based on average shares outstanding. |
(c) | The amount reported for a share outstanding may not accord with the change in aggregate gains and losses in securities for the fiscal period due to the timing of capital share transactions in relation to the fluctuating market values of the Fund’s underlying securities. |
(d) | Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations. |
(g) | Portfolio turnover rate excludes in-kind transactions. |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
F I N A N C I A L H I G H L I G H T S | | 51 |
| | |
Financial Highlights (continued) | | |
(For a share outstanding throughout the period) | | |
| | | | |
| |
| iShares Evolved U.S. Financials ETF | |
| | | | |
| | | Period From | |
| | | 03/21/18 | (a) |
| | | to 07/31/18 | |
| |
| | | | |
| |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $ | 24.98 | |
| | | | |
Net investment income(b) | | | 0.15 | |
Net realized and unrealized loss(c) | | | (0.43 | ) |
| | | | |
Net decrease from investment operations | | | (0.28 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Distributions(d) | | | | |
From net investment income | | | (0.11 | ) |
| | | | |
Total distributions | | | (0.11 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 24.59 | |
| | | | |
| |
Total Return | | | | |
Based on net asset value | | | (1.11 | )%(e)(f) |
| | | | |
| |
Ratios to Average Net Assets | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 0.18 | %(g) |
| | | | |
Net investment income | | | 1.65 | %(g) |
| | | | |
| |
Supplemental Data | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000) | | $ | 4,919 | |
| | | | |
Portfolio turnover rate(h) | | | 13 | %(e) |
| | | | |
(a) | Commencement of operations. |
(b) | Based on average shares outstanding. |
(c) | The amount reported for a share outstanding may not accord with the change in aggregate gains and losses in securities for the fiscal period due to the timing of capital share transactions in relation to the fluctuating market values of the Fund’s underlying securities. |
(d) | Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations. |
(f) | Includes payment received from an affiliate, which impacted the Fund’s total return. Excluding the payment from an affiliate, the Fund’s total return would have been -1.40%. |
(h) | Portfolio turnover rate excludes in-kind transactions. |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
52 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
| | |
Financial Highlights (continued) | | |
(For a share outstanding throughout the period) | | |
| | | | |
| |
| iShares Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF | |
| | | | |
| | | Period From | |
| | | 03/21/18 | (a) |
| | | to 07/31/18 | |
| |
| | | | |
| |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $ | 24.86 | |
| | | | |
Net investment income(b) | | | 0.08 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain(c) | | | 2.60 | |
| | | | |
Net increase from investment operations | | | 2.68 | |
| | | | |
| |
Distributions(d) | | | | |
From net investment income | | | (0.06 | ) |
| | | | |
Total distributions | | | (0.06 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 27.48 | |
| | | | |
| |
Total Return | | | | |
Based on net asset value | | | 10.77 | %(e) |
| | | | |
| |
Ratios to Average Net Assets | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 0.18 | %(f) |
| | | | |
Net investment income | | | 0.87 | %(f) |
| | | | |
| |
Supplemental Data | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000) | | $ | 5,495 | |
| | | | |
Portfolio turnover rate(g) | | | 0 | %(e) |
| | | | |
(a) | Commencement of operations. |
(b) | Based on average shares outstanding. |
(c) | The amount reported for a share outstanding may not accord with the change in aggregate gains and losses in securities for the fiscal period due to the timing of capital share transactions in relation to the fluctuating market values of the Fund’s underlying securities. |
(d) | Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations. |
(g) | Portfolio turnover rate excludes in-kind transactions. |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
F I N A N C I A L H I G H L I G H T S | | 53 |
| | |
Financial Highlights (continued) | | |
(For a share outstanding throughout the period) | | |
| | | | |
| |
| iShares Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF | |
| | | | |
| | | Period From | |
| | | 03/21/18 | (a) |
| | | to 07/31/18 | |
| |
| | | | |
| |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $ | 24.97 | |
| | | | |
Net investment income(b) | | | 0.11 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain(c) | | | 1.04 | |
| | | | |
Net increase from investment operations | | | 1.15 | |
| | | | |
| |
Distributions(d) | | | | |
From net investment income | | | (0.09 | ) |
| | | | |
Total distributions | | | (0.09 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 26.03 | |
| | | | |
| |
Total Return | | | | |
Based on net asset value | | | 4.62 | %(e) |
| | | | |
| |
Ratios to Average Net Assets | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 0.18 | %(f) |
| | | | |
Net investment income | | | 1.25 | %(f) |
| | | | |
| |
Supplemental Data | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000) | | $ | 5,206 | |
| | | | |
Portfolio turnover rate(g) | | | 3 | %(e) |
| | | | |
(a) | Commencement of operations. |
(b) | Based on average shares outstanding. |
(c) | The amount reported for a share outstanding may not accord with the change in aggregate gains and losses in securities for the fiscal period due to the timing of capital share transactions in relation to the fluctuating market values of the Fund’s underlying securities. |
(d) | Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations. |
(g) | Portfolio turnover rate excludes in-kind transactions. |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
54 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Financial Highlights (continued)
(For a share outstanding throughout the period)
| | | | |
| |
| iShares Evolved
U.S. Media and Entertainment ETF |
|
| | | | |
| | | Period From | |
| | | 03/21/18 | (a) |
| | | to 07/31/18 | |
| |
| | | | | |
| |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ | 25.05 | |
| | | | | |
Net investment income(b) | | | | 0.10 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain(c) | | | | 1.29 | |
| | | | | |
Net increase from investment operations | | | | 1.39 | |
| | | | | |
| |
Distributions(d) | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | (0.06 | ) |
| | | | | |
Total distributions | | | | (0.06 | ) |
| | | | | |
| |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ | 26.38 | |
| | | | | |
| |
Total Return | | | | | |
Based on net asset value | | | | 5.54 | %(e) |
| | | | | |
| |
Ratios to Average Net Assets | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | | 0.18 | %(f) |
| | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | 1.04 | %(f) |
| | | | | |
| |
Supplemental Data | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000) | | | $ | 5,277 | |
| | | | | |
Portfolio turnover rate(g) | | | | 0 | %(e) |
| | | | | |
(a) | Commencement of operations. |
(b) | Based on average shares outstanding. |
(c) | The amount reported for a share outstanding may not accord with the change in aggregate gains and losses in securities for the fiscal period due to the timing of capital share transactions in relation to the fluctuating market values of the Fund’s underlying securities. |
(d) | Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations. |
(g) | Portfolio turnover rate excludes in-kind transactions. |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
F I N A N C I A L H I G H L I G H T S | | 55 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
(For a share outstanding throughout the period)
| | | | |
| |
| iShares
Evolved U.S. Technology ETF |
|
| | | | |
| | | Period From | |
| | | 03/21/18 | (a) |
| | | to 07/31/18 | |
| |
| | | | | |
| |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ | 24.89 | |
| | | | | |
Net investment income(b) | | | | 0.06 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain(c) | | | | 1.43 | |
| | | | | |
Net increase from investment operations | | | | 1.49 | |
| | | | | |
| |
Distributions(d) | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | (0.05 | ) |
| | | | | |
Total distributions | | | | (0.05 | ) |
| | | | | |
| |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ | 26.33 | |
| | | | | |
| |
Total Return | | | | | |
Based on net asset value | | | | 6.00 | %(e) |
| | | | | |
| |
Ratios to Average Net Assets | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | | 0.18 | %(f) |
| | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | 0.70 | %(f) |
| | | | | |
| |
Supplemental Data | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000) | | | $ | 5,266 | |
| | | | | |
Portfolio turnover rate(g) | | | | 0 | %(e) |
| | | | | |
(a) | Commencement of operations. |
(b) | Based on average shares outstanding. |
(c) | The amount reported for a share outstanding may not accord with the change in aggregate gains and losses in securities for the fiscal period due to the timing of capital share transactions in relation to the fluctuating market values of the Fund’s underlying securities. |
(d) | Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations. |
(g) | Portfolio turnover rate excludes in-kind transactions. |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
56 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Notes to Financial Statements
iShares U.S. ETF Trust (the “Trust”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust is organized as a Delaware statutory trust and is authorized to have multiple series or portfolios.
These financial statements relate only to the following funds (each, a “Fund,” and collectively, the “Funds”):
| | |
iShares ETF | | Diversification Classification |
Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples(a) | | Non-diversified |
Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending(a) | | Non-diversified |
Evolved U.S. Financials(a) | | Non-diversified |
Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples(a) | | Non-diversified |
Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare(a) | | Non-diversified |
Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment(a) | | Non-diversified |
Evolved U.S. Technology(a) | | Non-diversified |
(a) The Fund commenced operations on March 21, 2018.
2. | Significant Accounting Policies |
The following significant accounting policies are consistently followed by each Fund in the preparation of its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Each Fund is considered an investment company under U.S. GAAP and follows the accounting and reporting guidance applicable to investment companies.
Investment Transactions and Income Recognition: Investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Realized gains and losses on investment transactions are determined using the specific identification method. Dividend income and capital gain distributions, if any, are recognized on the ex-dividend date, net of any foreign taxes withheld at source. Any taxes withheld that are reclaimable from foreign tax authorities are reflected in tax reclaims receivable. Distributions received by the Funds may include a return of capital that is estimated by management. Such amounts are recorded as a reduction of the cost of investments or reclassified to capital gains. Upon notification from issuers, some of the dividend income received from a real estate investment trust may be re-designated as a return of capital or capital gain. Non-cash dividends, if any, are recognized on the ex-dividend date and recorded as non-cash dividend income at fair value. Interest income is accrued daily.
Foreign Taxes: The Funds may be subject to foreign taxes (a portion of which may be reclaimable) on income, stock dividends, capital gains on investments, or certain foreign currency transactions. All foreign taxes are recorded in accordance with the applicable foreign tax regulations and rates that exist in the foreign jurisdictions in which each Fund invests. These foreign taxes, if any, are paid by each Fund and are reflected in its statement of operations as follows: foreign taxes withheld at source are presented as a reduction of income, foreign taxes on securities lending income are presented as a reduction of securities lending income, foreign taxes on stock dividends are presented as “other foreign taxes”, and foreign taxes on capital gains from sales of investments and foreign taxes on foreign currency transactions are included in their respective net realized gain (loss) categories. Foreign taxes payable or deferred as of July 31, 2018, if any, are disclosed in the statement of assets and liabilities.
In-kind Redemptions: For financial reporting purposes, in-kind redemptions are treated as sales of securities resulting in realized capital gains or losses to the Funds. Because such gains or losses are not taxable to the Funds and are not distributed to existing Fund shareholders, the gains or losses are reclassified from accumulated net realized gain (loss) to paid-in capital at the end of the Funds’ tax year. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or net asset value per share.
Distributions: Dividends and distributions paid by each Fund are recorded on the ex-dividend dates. Distributions are determined on a tax basis and may differ from net investment income and net realized capital gains for financial reporting purposes. Dividends and distributions are paid in U.S. dollars and cannot be automatically reinvested in additional shares of the Funds.
Indemnifications: In the normal course of business, each Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of representations that provide general indemnification. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown because it involves future potential claims against the Funds, which cannot be predicted with any certainty.
3. | Investment Valuation and Fair Value Measurements |
Investment Valuation Policies: Each Fund’s investments are valued at fair value (also referred to as “market value” within the financial statements) each day that the Fund’s listing exchange is open and, for financial reporting purposes, as of the report date should the reporting period end on a day that the Fund’s listing exchange is not open. U.S. GAAP defines fair value as the price a fund would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A fund determines the fair value of its financial instruments using various independent dealers or pricing services under policies approved by the Board of Trustees of the Trust (the “Board”). The BlackRock Global Valuation Methodologies Committee (the “Global Valuation Committee”) is the committee formed by management to develop global pricing policies and procedures and to oversee the pricing function for all financial instruments.
Fair Value Inputs and Methodologies: The following methods and inputs are used to establish the fair value of each Fund’s assets and liabilities:
| | |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S | | 57 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
| • | | Equity investments traded on a recognized securities exchange are valued at that day’s last traded price or official closing price, as applicable, on the exchange where the stock is primarily traded. Equity investments traded on a recognized exchange for which there were no sales on that day are valued at the last traded price. |
| • | | Investments in open-end U.S. mutual funds (including money market funds) are valued at that day’s published net asset value (“NAV”). |
If events (e.g., a company announcement, market volatility or a natural disaster) occur that are expected to materially affect the value of an investment, or in the event that application of these methods of valuation results in a price for an investment that is deemed not to be representative of the market value of such investment, or if a price is not available, the investment will be valued by the Global Valuation Committee, in accordance with policies approved by the Board as reflecting fair value (“Fair Valued Investments”). The fair valuation approaches that may be used by the Global Valuation Committee include market approach, income approach and the cost approach. Valuation techniques used under these approaches take into consideration inputs that include but are not limited to (i) attributes specific to the investment; (ii) the principal market for the investment; (iii) the customary participants in the principal market for the investment; (iv) data assumptions by market participants for the investment, if reasonably available; (v) quoted prices for similar investments in active markets; and (vi) other inputs, such as future cash flows, interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and/or default rates.
The Global Valuation Committee employs various methods for calibrating valuation approaches for investments where an active market does not exist, including regular due diligence of the Trust’s pricing vendors, regular reviews of key inputs and assumptions, transactional back-testing or disposition analysis to compare unrealized gains and losses to realized gains and losses, reviews of missing or stale prices and large movements in market values, and reviews of any market related activity. The pricing of all Fair Valued Investments is subsequently reported to the Board on a quarterly basis.
Fair Value Hierarchy: Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of financial instruments. These inputs to valuation techniques are categorized into a fair value hierarchy consisting of three broad levels for financial reporting purposes as follows:
| • | | Level 1 – Unadjusted price quotations in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; |
| • | | Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly, including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not considered to be active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs; and |
| • | | Level 3 – Unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available, (including the Global Valuation Committee’s assumptions used in determining the fair value of financial instruments). |
The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). Accordingly, the degree of judgement exercised in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. The inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the fair value hierarchy classification is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The fair value hierarchy for each Fund’s investments is included in its schedule of investments.
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of an assigned level within the hierarchy. In accordance with the Trust’s policy, transfers between different levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to have occurred as of the beginning of the reporting period. The categorization of a value determined for financial instruments is based on the pricing transparency of the financial instruments and is not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities.
4. | Securities and Other Investments |
Securities Lending: Each Fund may lend its securities to approved borrowers, such as brokers, dealers and other financial institutions. The borrower pledges and maintains with the Fund collateral consisting of cash, an irrevocable letter of credit issued by an approved bank, or securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government. The initial collateral received by each Fund is required to have a value of at least 102% of the current market value of the loaned securities for securities traded on U.S. exchanges and a value of at least 105% for all other securities. The collateral is maintained thereafter at a value equal to at least 100% of the current value of the securities on loan. The market value of the loaned securities is determined at the close of each business day of the Fund and any additional required collateral is delivered to the Fund or excess collateral is returned by the Fund, on the next business day. During the term of the loan, each Fund is entitled to all distributions made on or in respect of the loaned securities but does not receive interest income on securities received as collateral. Loans of securities are terminable at any time and the borrower, after notice, is required to return borrowed securities within the standard time period for settlement of securities transactions.
As of July 31, 2018, any securities on loan were collateralized by cash and/or U.S. government obligations. Cash collateral received was invested in money market funds managed by BlackRock Fund Advisors (“BFA”), the Funds’ investment adviser, or its affiliates and is disclosed in the schedules of investments. Any non-cash collateral received cannot be sold, re-invested or pledged by the Fund, except in the event of borrower default. The securities on loan for each Fund, if any, are also disclosed in its schedule of investments. The market value of any securities on loan as of July 31, 2018 and the value of the related cash collateral are disclosed in the statements of assets and liabilities.
Securities lending transactions are entered into by a fund under Master Securities Lending Agreements (each, an “MSLA”) which provide the right, in the event of default (including bankruptcy or insolvency) for the non-defaulting party to liquidate the collateral and calculate a net exposure to the defaulting party or request additional collateral. In the event that a borrower defaults, the fund, as lender, would offset the market value of the collateral received against the market value of the securities loaned. The value of the collateral is typically greater than the market value of the securities loaned, leaving the lender with a net amount payable to the defaulting party. However, bankruptcy or insolvency laws of a particular jurisdiction may impose restrictions on or prohibitions against such a right of offset in the event of an MSLA counterparty’s bankruptcy or insolvency. Under the MSLA, absent an event of default, the borrower can resell or re-pledge the loaned securities, and the fund can reinvest cash collateral received in connection with loaned securities.
| | |
58 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
The following table is a summary of the securities lending agreements by counterparty which are subject to offset under an MSLA as of July 31, 2018:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | Market Value of | | | | Cash Collateral | | | | Non-Cash Collateral | | | | | |
iShares ETF and Counterparty | | | Securities on Loan | | | | Received | (a) | | | Received | | | | Net Amount | |
| |
Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jefferies LLC | | $ | 2,700 | | | $ | 2,700 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
SG Americas Securities LLC | | | 7,253 | | | | 7,253 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 9,953 | | | $ | 9,953 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. | | $ | 390 | | | $ | 390 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC | | | 4,595 | | | | 4,595 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith | | | 5,348 | | | | 5,284 | | | | — | | | | (64 | )(b) |
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (U.S. Equity Securities Lending) | | | 10,931 | | | | 10,931 | | | | — | | | | — | |
RBC Capital Markets LLC | | | 2,890 | | | | 2,890 | | | | — | | | | — | |
SG Americas Securities LLC | | | 4,589 | | | | 4,589 | | | | — | | | | — | |
UBS AG | | | 786 | | | | 786 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 29,529 | | | $ | 29,465 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (64 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. | | $ | 4,237 | | | $ | 4,237 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. | | $ | 38,093 | | | $ | 38,093 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Jefferies LLC | | | 31,402 | | | | 31,402 | | | | — | | | | — | |
SG Americas Securities LLC | | | 9,777 | | | | 9,698 | | | | — | | | | (79 | )(b) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 79,272 | | | $ | 79,193 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (79 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. | | $ | 181,739 | | | $ | 181,739 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Jefferies LLC | | | 196,669 | | | | 196,669 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 378,408 | | | $ | 378,408 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Evolved U.S. Technology | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. | | $ | 14,459 | | | $ | 14,459 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC | | | 7,175 | | | | 7,102 | | | | — | | | | (73 | )(b) |
Jefferies LLC | | | 9,986 | | | | 9,962 | | | | — | | | | (24 | )(b) |
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (U.S. Equity Securities Lending) | | | 5,562 | | | | 5,562 | | | | — | | | | — | |
RBC Capital Markets LLC | | | 12,464 | | | | 12,464 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 49,646 | | | $ | 49,549 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (97 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (a) | Collateral received in excess of the market value of securities on loan is not presented in this table. The total cash collateral received by each Fund is disclosed in the Fund’s statement of assets and liabilities. |
| (b) | Additional collateral is delivered to the Fund on the next business day in accordance with the MSLA. The net amount would be subject to the borrower default indemnity in the event of default by a counterparty. |
The risks of securities lending include the risk that the borrower may not provide additional collateral when required or may not return the securities when due. To mitigate these risks, each Fund benefits from a borrower default indemnity provided by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”). BlackRock’s indemnity allows for full replacement of the securities loaned if the collateral received does not cover the value of the securities loaned in the event of borrower default. Each Fund could incur a loss if the value of an investment purchased with cash collateral falls below the market value of the loaned securities or if the value of an investment purchased with cash collateral falls below the value of the original cash collateral received.
5. | Investment Advisory Agreement and Other Transactions with Affiliates |
Investment Advisory Fees: Pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement with the Trust, BFA manages the investment of each Fund’s assets. BFA is a California corporation indirectly owned by BlackRock. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, BFA is responsible for substantially all expenses of the Funds, except (i) interest and taxes; (ii) brokerage commissions and other expenses connected with the execution of portfolio transactions; (iii) distribution fees; (iv) the advisory fee payable to BFA; and (v) litigation expenses and any extraordinary expenses (in each case as determined by a majority of the independent trustees).
| | |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S | | 59 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
For its investment advisory services to each Fund, BFA is entitled to an annual investment advisory fee, accrued daily and paid monthly by the Funds, based on the average daily net assets of each Fund as follows:
| | | | |
iShares ETF | | Investment Advisory Fee | |
Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples | | | 0.18 | % |
Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending | | | 0.18 | |
Evolved U.S. Financials | | | 0.18 | |
Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples | | | 0.18 | |
Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare | | | 0.18 | |
Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment | | | 0.18 | |
Evolved U.S. Technology | | | 0.18 | |
Distributor: BlackRock Investments, LLC, an affiliate of BFA, is the distributor for each Fund. Pursuant to the distribution agreement, BFA is responsible for any fees or expenses for distribution services provided to the Funds.
Securities Lending: The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has issued an exemptive order which permits BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. (“BTC”),an affiliate of BFA, to serve as securities lending agent for the Funds, subject to applicable conditions. As securities lending agent, BTC bears all operational costs directly related to securities lending. Each Fund is responsible for fees in connection with the investment of cash collateral received for securities on loan in a money market fund managed by BFA, or its affiliates, however, BTC has agreed to reduce the amount of securities lending income it receives in order to effectively limit the collateral investment fees each Fund bears to an annual rate of 0.04% (the “collateral investment fees”). Securities lending income is equal to the total of income earned from the reinvestment of cash collateral (excluding collateral investment fees), net of fees and other payments to and from borrowers of securities. Each Fund retains a portion of securities lending income and remits the remaining portion to BTC as compensation for its services as securities lending agent.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement, each Fund retains 71.5% of securities lending income (which excludes collateral investment fees) and the amount retained can never be less than 65% of the total of securities lending income plus the collateral investment fees.
In addition, commencing the business day following the date that the aggregate securities lending income plus the collateral investment fees generated across all 1940 Act iShares exchange-traded funds (the “iShares ETF Complex”) in a given calendar year exceeds the aggregate securities lending income generated across the iShares ETF Complex in the calendar year 2013, each Fund, pursuant to a securities lending agreement, will retain for the remainder of that calendar year 75% of securities lending income and the amount retained can never be less than 65% of the total of securities lending income plus the collateral investment fees.
The share of securities lending income earned by each Fund is shown as securities lending income – affiliated – net in its statement of operations. For the period ended July 31, 2018, the Funds paid BTC the following amounts for securities lending agent services:
| | | | |
iShares ETF | | Fees Paid to BTC | |
Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples | | $ | 3 | |
Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending | | | 26 | |
Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples | | | 11 | |
Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare | | | 75 | |
Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment | | | 143 | |
Evolved U.S. Technology | | | 10 | |
Officers and Trustees: Certain officers and/or trustees of the Trust are officers and/or trustees of BlackRock or its affiliates.
Other Transactions: The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. is the largest stockholder and an affiliate of BlackRock for 1940 Act purposes.
The iShares Evolved U.S. Financials ETF is expected to receive a payment from BFA to compensate the Fund for an operating error that occurred during the period. The payment is shown as other assets in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
Each Fund may invest its positive cash balances in certain money market funds managed by BFA or an affiliate. The income earned on these temporary cash investments is shown as dividends – affiliated in the statements of operations.
It is possible that, from time to time, BlackRock and/or funds managed by BFA or an affiliate (collectively, “Affiliates”) may purchase and hold shares of a Fund. Affiliates reserve the right, subject to compliance with applicable law, to sell into the market or redeem in Creation Units through an authorized participant at any time some or all of the shares of a Fund acquired for their own accounts. A large sale or redemption of shares of a Fund by Affiliates could significantly reduce the asset size of the Fund, which
| | |
60 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
might have an adverse effect on the Fund. As of July 31, 2018, the number of affiliated accounts that individually represent more than 10% ownership of a Fund’s total shares outstanding and the aggregate percentage of net assets represented by such holdings were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
iShares ETF | | Number of Affiliated Accounts | | | Aggregate Affiliated Ownership Percentage | |
Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples | | | 1 | | | | 91 | % |
Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending | | | 1 | | | | 75 | |
Evolved U.S. Financials | | | 1 | | | | 75 | |
Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples | | | 1 | | | | 75 | |
Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare | | | 1 | | | | 75 | |
Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment | | | 1 | | | | 48 | |
Evolved U.S. Technology | | | 1 | | | | 68 | |
For the period ended July 31, 2018, purchases and sales of investments, excluding in-kind transactions and short-term investments, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
iShares ETF | | Purchases | | | Sales | |
Evolved U.S. Financials | | $ | 569,979 | | | $ | 569,830 | |
Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare | | | 149,698 | | | | 159,796 | |
Evolved U.S. Technology | | | — | | | | 2,157 | |
For the period ended July 31, 2018, in-kind transactions were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
iShares ETF | | In-kind Purchases | | | In-kind Sales | |
Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples | | $ | 4,905,172 | | | $ | 1,167,921 | |
Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending | | | 4,932,179 | | | | — | |
Evolved U.S. Financials | | | 4,908,701 | | | | — | |
Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples | | | 4,929,971 | | | | — | |
Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare | | | 4,893,421 | | | | — | |
Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment | | | 4,944,306 | | | | — | |
Evolved U.S. Technology | | | 4,878,911 | | | | — | |
Each Fund is treated as an entity separate from the Trust’s other funds for federal income tax purposes. It is the policy of each Fund to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions applicable to regulated investment companies, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and to annually distribute substantially all of its ordinary income and any net capital gains (taking into account any capital loss carryforwards) sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income and excise taxes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes is required.
Management has analyzed tax laws and regulations and their application to the Funds as of July 31, 2018, inclusive of the open tax return years, and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability in the Funds’ financial statements.
U.S. GAAP requires that certain components of net assets be adjusted to reflect permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or NAV per share. As of July 31, 2018, the following permanent differences attributable to the use of equalization and realized gains (losses) from in-kind redemptions, were reclassified to the following accounts:
| | | | | | | | |
iShares ETF | | Paid-in Capital | | | Accumulated Net Realized Gain (Loss) | |
Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples | | $ | (7,665) | | | $ | 7,665 | |
The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:
| | | | |
iShares ETF | | Period Ended 07/31/18 | |
Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples Ordinary income | | $ | 32,423 | |
| | | | |
| | |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S | | 61 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
| | | | |
iShares ETF | | Period Ended 07/31/18 | |
Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending Ordinary income | | $ | 18,716 | |
| | | | |
Evolved U.S. Financials Ordinary income | | $ | 21,657 | |
| | | | |
Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples Ordinary income | | $ | 11,128 | |
| | | | |
Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare Ordinary income | | $ | 17,405 | |
| | | | |
Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment Ordinary income | | $ | 11,735 | |
| | | | |
Evolved U.S. Technology Ordinary income | | $ | 10,692 | |
| | | | |
As of July 31, 2018, the tax components of accumulated net earnings (losses) were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Undistributed | | | | Capital Loss | | | | Net Unrealized | | | | | | | |
iShares ETF | | | Ordinary Income | | | | Carryforwards | | | | Gains (Losses) | (a) | | | Total | | | |
Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples | | $ | 34,014 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 17,454 | | | $ | 51,468 | | | |
Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending | | | 4,368 | | | | — | | | | 407,531 | | | | 411,899 | | | |
Evolved U.S. Financials | | | 6,588 | | | | (21,341 | ) | | | (4,454 | ) | | | (19,207 | ) | | |
Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples | | | 4,900 | | | | — | | | | 529,873 | | | | 534,773 | | | |
Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare | | | 31,082 | | | | — | | | | 256,203 | | | | 287,285 | | | |
Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment | | | 19,926 | | | | — | | | | 276,929 | | | | 296,855 | | | |
Evolved U.S. Technology | | | 2,101 | | | | — | | | | 356,362 | | | | 358,463 | | | |
(a) The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized gains (losses) was attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of July 31, 2018, the iShares Evolved U.S. Financials ETF had non-expiring capital loss carryforwards in the amount of $21,341 available to offset future realized capital gains.
As of July 31, 2018, gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation based on cost of investments (including short positions and derivatives, if any) for U.S. federal income tax purposes were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
iShares ETF | | Tax Cost | | | Gross Unrealized Appreciation | | | Gross Unrealized Depreciation | | | Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | | | |
Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples | | $ | 3,743,967 | | | $ | 146,325 | | | | $ (128,871 | ) | | $ | 17,454 | | | |
Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending | | | 4,988,129 | | | | 497,475 | | | | (89,944 | ) | | | 407,531 | | | |
Evolved U.S. Financials | | | 4,906,501 | | | | 119,355 | | | | (123,809 | ) | | | (4,454 | ) | | |
Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples | | | 4,966,944 | | | | 581,421 | | | | (51,548 | ) | | | 529,873 | | | |
Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare | | | 5,043,806 | | | | 466,536 | | | | (210,333 | ) | | | 256,203 | | | |
Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment | | | 5,379,248 | | | | 410,577 | | | | (133,648 | ) | | | 276,929 | | | |
Evolved U.S. Technology | | | 4,961,207 | | | | 433,104 | | | | (76,742 | ) | | | 356,362 | | | |
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was enacted on December 22, 2017. Certain provisions of the Act were effective upon enactment with the remainder becoming effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. Although the Act does not amend any provisions directly related to the qualification or taxation of regulated investment companies (“RICs”), the Act does change the taxation of entities in which some RICs invest, the tax treatment of income derived from those entities and the taxation of RIC shareholders. While management does not anticipate significant impact to the funds or to their shareholders, there is uncertainty in the application of certain provisions in the Act. Specifically, provisions in the Act may increase the amount of or accelerate the recognition of taxable income and may limit the deductibility of certain expenses by RICs. Until full clarity around these provisions is obtained, the impact on the Funds’ financial statements, if any, cannot be fully determined.
In the normal course of business, each Fund invests in securities or other instruments and may enter into certain transactions, and such activities subject the Fund to various risks, including, among others, fluctuations in the market (market risk) or failure of an issuer to meet all of its obligations. The value of securities or other instruments may also be affected by various factors, including, without limitation: (i) the general economy; (ii) the overall market as well as local, regional or global political and/or social instability; (iii) regulation, taxation or international tax treaties between various countries; or (iv) currency, interest rate or price fluctuations. Each Fund’s prospectus provides details of the risks to which the Fund is subject.
| | |
62 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
Market Risk: Market risk arises mainly from uncertainty about future values of financial instruments influenced by price, currency and interest rate movements. It represents the potential loss a fund may suffer through holding market positions in the face of market movements. A fund is exposed to market risk by its investment in equity, fixed income and/or financial derivative instruments or by its investment in underlying funds. The fair value of securities held by a fund may decline due to general market conditions, economic trends or events that are not specifically related to the issuers of the securities including local, regional or global political, social or economic instability or to factors that affect a particular industry or group of industries. The extent of a fund’s exposure to market risk is the market value of the investments held as shown in the fund’s schedule of investments.
Credit Risk: Credit risk is the risk that an issuer or guarantor of debt instruments or the counterparty to a financial transaction, including derivatives contracts, repurchase agreements or loans of portfolio securities, is unable or unwilling to make timely interest and/or principal payments or to otherwise honor its obligations. BFA and its affiliates manage counterparty credit risk by entering into transactions only with counterparties that they believe have the financial resources to honor their obligations and by monitoring the financial stability of those counterparties. Financial assets, which potentially expose a fund to issuer and counterparty credit risks, consist principally of financial instruments and receivables due from counterparties. The extent of a fund’s exposure to credit and counterparty risks with respect to those financial assets is approximated by their value recorded in its statement of assets and liabilities.
Concentration Risk: A diversified portfolio, where this is appropriate and consistent with a fund’s objectives, minimizes the risk that a price change of a particular investment will have a material impact on the NAV of a fund. The investment concentrations within each Fund’s portfolio are disclosed in its schedule of investments.
When a fund concentrates its investments in securities within a single or limited number of market sectors, it assumes the risk that economic, regulatory, political and social conditions affecting such sectors may have a significant impact on the fund and could affect the income from, or the value or liquidity of, the fund’s portfolio.
9. | Capital Share Transactions |
Capital shares are issued and redeemed by each Fund only in aggregations of a specified number of shares or multiples thereof (“Creation Units”) at NAV. Except when aggregated in Creation Units, shares of each Fund are not redeemable.
Transactions in capital shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Period Ended 07/31/18 | |
| | | | |
iShares ETF | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 4,923,212 | |
Shares redeemed | | | (50,000 | ) | | | (1,211,775 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase | | | 150,000 | | | $ | 3,711,437 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 4,956,981 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Evolved U.S. Financials | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 4,938,160 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 4,960,601 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 4,918,256 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 4,979,943 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Evolved U.S. Technology | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 4,907,809 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The consideration for the purchase of Creation Units of a fund in the Trust generally consists of the in-kind deposit of a designated portfolio of securities and a specified amount of cash. Certain funds in the Trust may be offered in Creation Units solely or partially for cash in U.S. dollars. Investors purchasing and redeeming Creation Units may pay a purchase transaction fee and a redemption transaction fee directly to State Street Bank and Trust Company, the Trust’s administrator, to offset transfer and other transaction costs associated with the issuance and redemption of Creation Units, including Creation Units for cash. Investors transacting in Creation Units for cash may also pay an additional variable charge to compensate the relevant fund for certain transaction costs (i.e., stamp taxes, taxes on currency or other financial transactions, and brokerage costs) and market impact expenses relating to investing in portfolio securities. Such variable charges, if any, are included in shares sold in the table above.
On June 16, 2016, investors in certain iShares funds (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF, iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF, iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF, iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF, iShares Select Dividend ETF, iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF, iShares Morningstar Large-Cap ETF, iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF and iShares U.S. Preferred Stock ETF) filed a class action lawsuit against iShares Trust, BlackRock,
| | |
N O T E S T O F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S | | 63 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
Inc. and certain of its advisory affiliates, and certain directors/trustees and officers of the Funds (collectively, “Defendants”) in California State Court. The lawsuit alleges the Defendants violated federal securities laws by failing to adequately disclose in the prospectuses issued by the funds noted above the risks of using stop-loss orders in the event of a ‘flash crash’, such as the one that occurred on May 6, 2010. On September 18, 2017, the court issued a Statement of Decision holding that the Plaintiffs lack standing to assert their claims. On October 11, 2017, the court entered final judgment dismissing all of the Plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs have appealed the court’s decision.
Management has evaluated the impact of all subsequent events on the Funds through the date the financial statements were available to be issued and has determined that there were no subsequent events requiring adjustment or additional disclosure in the financial statements.
| | |
64 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Trustees of iShares U.S. ETF Trust and
Shareholders of iShares Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF,
iShares Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF, iShares Evolved U.S. Financials ETF,
iShares Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF, iShares Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF,
iShares Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment ETF and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF
Opinions on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the schedules of investments, of iShares Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF, iShares Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF, iShares Evolved U.S. Financials ETF, iShares Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF, iShares Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF, iShares Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment ETF and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (seven of the funds constituting iShares U.S. ETF Trust, hereafter collectively referred to as the “Funds”) as of July 31, 2018, the related statements of operations and changes in net assets, including the related notes, and the financial highlights for the period March 21, 2018 (commencement of operations) through July 31, 2018 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of each of the Funds as of July 31, 2018, and the results of each of their operations, changes in each of their net assets, and each of their financial highlights for the period March 21, 2018 (commencement of operations) through July 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinions
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Funds’ financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Funds in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2018 by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agent and brokers; when replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Francisco, California
September 25, 2018
We have served as the auditor of one or more BlackRock investment companies since 2000.
| | | | |
R E P O R T O F I N D E P E N D E N T R E G I S T E R E D P U B L I C A C C O U N T I N G F I R M | | | 65 | |
Important Tax Information (unaudited)
For corporate shareholders, the percentage of dividend income paid during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018 that qualified for the dividends-received deductions were as follows:
| | |
iShares ETF | | Dividends-Received Deduction |
Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples | | 90.70% |
Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending | | 100.00% |
Evolved U.S. Financials | | 100.00% |
Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples | | 100.00% |
Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare | | 49.98% |
Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment | | 62.84% |
Evolved U.S. Technology | | 100.00% |
The following maximum amounts are hereby designated as qualified dividend income for individuals for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018:
| | |
iShares ETF | | Qualified Dividend Income |
Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples | | $ 60,274 |
Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending | | 25,084 |
Evolved U.S. Financials | | 30,258 |
Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples | | 16,396 |
Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare | | 24,235 |
Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment | | 20,500 |
Evolved U.S. Technology | | 15,406 |
| | |
66 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Board Review and Approval of Investment Advisory Contract
I. iShares Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF
Under Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”), including a majority of Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) (the “Independent Trustees”), is required annually to consider and approve the Investment Advisory Contract between the Trust and BFA (the “Advisory Contract”) on behalf of the Fund. The Independent Trustees requested, and BFA provided, such information as the Independent Trustees, with advice from independent counsel, deemed reasonably necessary to evaluate the Advisory Contract. At a meeting on May 11, 2018, a committee composed of all of the Independent Trustees (the “15(c) Committee”), with independent counsel, met with management and reviewed and discussed information provided in response to initial requests of the 15(c) Committee and/or their independent counsel, and requested certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At these meetings, the 15(c) Committee reviewed and discussed information provided in response to the 15(c) Committee’s initial requests, and requested certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At a meeting held on May 24, 2018, management presented additional information to the Board relating to the continuance of the Advisory Contract, including information requested by the 15(c) Committee during its initial meeting. The Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed and discussed such information at length. The Independent Trustees requested from management certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At a meeting held on June 12-14, 2018, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed the additional information provided by management in response to these requests. After extensive discussions, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, approved the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the Fund, based on a review of qualitative and quantitative information provided by BFA. The Board noted its satisfaction with the extent and quality of information provided and its frequent interactions with management, as well as the detailed responses and other information provided by BFA. The Independent Trustees were advised by their independent counsel throughout the process, including about the legal standards applicable to their review. In approving the Advisory Contract for the Fund, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, considered various factors, including: (i) the expenses and performance of the Fund; (ii) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by BFA; (iii) the costs of services provided to the Fund and profits realized by BFA and its affiliates; (iv) economies of scale; (v) the fees and services provided for other comparable funds/accounts managed by BFA and its affiliates; and (vi) other benefits to BFA and/or its affiliates. The material factors, no one of which was controlling, and conclusions that formed the basis for the Board, including the Independent Trustees, to approve the Advisory Contract are discussed below.
Expenses and Performance of the Fund – The Board reviewed statistical information prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of investment company data, regarding the expense ratio components, including gross and net total expenses, fees and expenses of another fund in which the Fund invests (if applicable), and waivers/reimbursements (if applicable) of the Fund in comparison with the same information for other ETFs (including, where applicable, funds sponsored by an “at cost” service provider), objectively selected by Broadridge as comprising the Fund’s applicable peer group pursuant to Broadridge’s proprietary ETF methodology (the “Peer Group”). The Board was provided with a detailed description of the proprietary ETF methodology used by Broadridge to determine the Fund’s Peer Group. The Board further noted that due to the limitations in providing comparable funds in the Peer Group, the statistical information provided in Broadridge’s report may or may not provide meaningful direct comparisons to the Fund in all instances.
The Board also noted that the investment advisory fee rate and overall expenses (net of waivers and reimbursements) for the Fund were lower than the median of the investment advisory fee rates and overall expenses (net of waivers and reimbursements) of the funds in its Peer Group, excluding iShares funds.
Because the Fund had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017, the Board did not review any performance information for the Fund.
Based on this review, the other factors considered at the meeting, and their general knowledge of ETF pricing, the Board concluded that the investment advisory fee rate and expense level and the historical performance of the Fund supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided by BFA – Based on management’s representations, including information about recent and proposed enhancements to the iShares business, including with respect to capital markets support and analysis, technology, portfolio management, product design and quality, compliance and risk management, global public policy and other services, the Board expected that there would be no diminution in the scope of services required of or provided by BFA under the Advisory Contract for the coming year as compared to the scope of services provided by BFA during prior years. In reviewing the scope of these services, the Board considered BFA’s investment philosophy and experience, noting that BFA and its affiliates have committed significant resources over time, including during the past year, to support the iShares funds and their shareholders. The Board also considered BFA’s compliance program and its compliance record with respect to the Fund. In that regard, the Board noted that BFA reports to the Board about portfolio management and compliance matters on a periodic basis in connection with regularly scheduled meetings of the Board, and on other occasions as necessary and appropriate, and has provided information and made relevant officers and other employees of BFA (and its affiliates) available as needed to provide further assistance with these matters. The Board also reviewed the background and experience of the persons responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund, as well as the resources available to them in managing the Fund. In addition to the above considerations, the Board reviewed and considered detailed presentations regarding BFA’s investment performance, investment and risk management processes and strategies provided at the June 12-14, 2018 meeting and throughout the year, and matters related to BFA’s portfolio compliance policies and procedures.
Based on review of this information, and the performance information discussed above, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund under the Advisory Contract supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Costs of Services Provided to the Fund and Profits Realized by BFA and its Affiliates – The Board reviewed information about the profitability of the iShares complex to BlackRock, based on the fees payable to BFA and its affiliates (including fees under the Advisory Contract), and other sources of revenue and expense to BFA and its affiliates from the iShares funds’ operations for the last calendar year. The Board did not consider the profitability of the Fund to BFA and its affiliates since the Fund had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017. The Board reviewed BlackRock’s profitability methodology for the iShares funds, noting that the 15(c) Committee and the Board had focused on the methodology and profitability presentation during their meetings. The Board noted that the 15(c) Committee had focused on the methodology and profitability presentation during its meetings. The Board further noted that it considered the supplemental information the 15(c) Committee requested, which BlackRock provided, regarding the methodology. The Board discussed the sources of direct and ancillary revenue with management, including the revenues to BTC, a BlackRock
| | |
B O A R D R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O F I N V E S T M E N T A D V I S O R Y C O N T R A C T | | 67 |
Board Review and Approval of Investment Advisory Contract (continued)
affiliate, from securities lending by the iShares funds. The Board noted that it expects to receive profitability information from BFA on at least an annual basis following the Fund’s launch and thus be in a position to evaluate whether any new or additional breakpoints or other adjustments in Fund fees would be appropriate.
Economies of Scale – The Board reviewed information regarding potential economies of scale or other efficiencies that may result from increases in the Fund’s assets, noting that the issue of economies of scale had been focused on by the 15(c) Committee and the Board during their meetings and addressed by management. The 15(c) Committee and the Board received information regarding BlackRock’s historical profitability, including BFA’s and its affiliates’ costs in providing services. The cost information distinguished, among other things, between fixed and variable costs, and showed how the level of fixed and variable costs, as well as the nature of such costs, may impact the existence or size of scale benefits. The 15(c) Committee and the Board reviewed information provided by BFA regarding the sharing of scale benefits with the iShares funds through various means, including, as applicable, through relatively low fee rates established at inception, breakpoints, waivers, or other fee reductions, as well as through additional investment in the iShares business and the provision of improved or additional infrastructure and services to the iShares funds and their shareholders. The Board noted that the Advisory Contract for the Fund did not provide for breakpoints in the Fund’s investment advisory fee rate as the assets of the Fund increase. However, the Board noted that a breakpoint structure for the Fund may be appropriate should material economies of scale exist in the future that are not otherwise shared, and that it would continue to monitor the sharing of economies of scale to determine the appropriateness of adding breakpoints in the future.
Based on this review of the sharing of scale benefits, as well as the other factors considered at the meeting, the Board concluded that the information concerning the sharing of scale benefits supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Fees and Services Provided for Other Comparable Funds/Accounts Managed by BFA and its Affiliates – The Board received and considered information regarding the investment advisory/management fee rates for other funds/accounts in the U.S. for which BFA (or its affiliates) provides investment advisory/management services, including open-end funds registered under the 1940 Act (including sub-advised funds), collective trust funds, and institutional separate accounts (collectively, the “Other Accounts”), and acknowledged BFA’s assertion that the iShares funds are fundamentally different investment vehicles from the Other Accounts. The Board noted that BFA and its affiliates do not manage Other Accounts with a similar investment strategy or investment mandate as the Fund. The Board further noted that BFA provided the Board with detailed information regarding how the Other Accounts generally differ from the Fund, including in terms of the different and generally more extensive services provided to the Fund, as well as other significant differences. In that regard, the Board considered that the pricing of services to institutional clients is typically based on a number of factors beyond the nature and extent of the specific services to be provided and often depends on the overall relationship between the client and its affiliates and the adviser and its affiliates. In addition, the Board considered the relative complexity and inherent risks and challenges of managing and providing other services to the Fund, as a publicly traded ETF, as compared to the Other Accounts, particularly those that are institutional clients, in light of differing regulatory requirements and client-imposed mandates. The Board also acknowledged management’s assertion that, for certain iShares funds, and for client segmentation purposes, BlackRock has launched an iShares fund that may provide a similar investment exposure at a lower investment advisory fee rate. The Board also considered the “all-inclusive” nature of the Fund’s advisory fee structure, and the Fund’s expenses borne by BFA under this arrangement. The Board noted that the investment advisory fee rate under the Advisory Contract for the Fund was generally higher than the investment advisory/management fee rates for certain of the Other Accounts (particularly institutional clients) and concluded that the differences appeared to be consistent with the factors discussed.
Other Benefits to BFA and/or its Affiliates – Except as noted below, the Board did not consider the “fallout” benefits or ancillary revenue to be received by BFA and/or its affiliates in connection with the services to be provided to the Fund by BFA, since the Fund has not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017. The Board reviewed the “fallout” benefits or ancillary revenue received by BFA and/or its affiliates in connection with the services provided to other iShares funds by BFA, such as payment of revenue to BTC, the securities lending agent to the iShares funds, for loaning portfolio securities (which was included in the profit margins reviewed by the Board pursuant to BFA’s profitability methodology), and payment of advisory fees and/or administration fees to BFA (or its affiliates) in connection with any investments by the iShares funds in other funds for which BFA (or its affiliates) provides investment advisory services and/or administration services. The Board also noted the revenue received by BFA and/or its affiliates pursuant to an agreement that permits a service provider to use certain portions of BlackRock’s technology platform to service accounts managed by BFA and/or its affiliates, including the iShares funds. The Board noted that BFA generally does not use soft dollars or consider the value of research or other services that may be provided to BFA (including its affiliates) in selecting brokers for portfolio transactions for the iShares funds. The Board further noted that any portfolio transactions on behalf of the iShares funds placed through a BFA affiliate or purchased from an underwriting syndicate in which a BFA affiliate participates (including associated commissions) are reported to the Board pursuant to Rule 17e-1 or Rule 10f-3, as applicable, under the 1940 Act. The Board concluded that any such ancillary benefits would not be disadvantageous to the Fund and thus would not alter the Board’s conclusion with respect to the appropriateness of approving the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Conclusion – Based on a review of the factors described above, as well as such other factors as deemed appropriate by the Board, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, determined that the Fund’s investment advisory fee rate under the Advisory Contract does not constitute a fee that is so disproportionately large as to bear no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and that could not have been the product of arm’s-length bargaining, and concluded to approve the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
II. iShares Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF
Under Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”), including a majority of Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) (the “Independent Trustees”), is required annually to consider and approve the Investment Advisory Contract between the Trust and BFA (the “Advisory Contract”) on behalf of the Fund. The Independent Trustees requested, and BFA provided, such information as the Independent Trustees, with advice from independent counsel, deemed reasonably necessary to evaluate the Advisory Contract. At a meeting on May 11, 2018, a committee composed of all of the Independent Trustees (the “15(c) Committee”), with independent counsel, met with management and reviewed and discussed information provided in response to initial requests of the 15(c) Committee and/or their independent counsel, and requested certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At these meetings, the 15(c) Committee reviewed and discussed information provided in response to the 15(c) Committee’s initial requests, and requested certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At a meeting held on May 24, 2018, management presented additional information to the Board relating to the
| | |
68 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Board Review and Approval of Investment Advisory Contract (continued)
continuance of the Advisory Contract, including information requested by the 15(c) Committee during its initial meeting. The Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed and discussed such information at length. The Independent Trustees requested from management certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At a meeting held on June 12-14, 2018, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed the additional information provided by management in response to these requests. After extensive discussions, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, approved the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the Fund, based on a review of qualitative and quantitative information provided by BFA. The Board noted its satisfaction with the extent and quality of information provided and its frequent interactions with management, as well as the detailed responses and other information provided by BFA. The Independent Trustees were advised by their independent counsel throughout the process, including about the legal standards applicable to their review. In approving the Advisory Contract for the Fund, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, considered various factors, including: (i) the expenses and performance of the Fund; (ii) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by BFA; (iii) the costs of services provided to the Fund and profits realized by BFA and its affiliates; (iv) economies of scale; (v) the fees and services provided for other comparable funds/accounts managed by BFA and its affiliates; and (vi) other benefits to BFA and/or its affiliates. The material factors, no one of which was controlling, and conclusions that formed the basis for the Board, including the Independent Trustees, to approve the Advisory Contract are discussed below.
Expenses and Performance of the Fund – The Board reviewed statistical information prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of investment company data, regarding the expense ratio components, including gross and net total expenses, fees and expenses of another fund in which the Fund invests (if applicable), and waivers/reimbursements (if applicable) of the Fund in comparison with the same information for other ETFs (including, where applicable, funds sponsored by an “at cost” service provider), objectively selected by Broadridge as comprising the Fund’s applicable peer group pursuant to Broadridge’s proprietary ETF methodology (the “Peer Group”). The Board was provided with a detailed description of the proprietary ETF methodology used by Broadridge to determine the Fund’s Peer Group. The Board further noted that due to the limitations in providing comparable funds in the Peer Group, the statistical information provided in Broadridge’s report may or may not provide meaningful direct comparisons to the Fund in all instances.
The Board also noted that the investment advisory fee rate and overall expenses (net of waivers and reimbursements)for the Fund were lower than the median of the investment advisory fee rates and overall expenses (net of waivers and reimbursements) of the funds in its Peer Group, excluding iShares funds.
Because the Fund had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017, the Board did not review any performance information for the Fund.
Based on this review, the other factors considered at the meeting, and their general knowledge of ETF pricing, the Board concluded that the investment advisory fee rate and expense level and the historical performance of the Fund supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided by BFA – Based on management’s representations, including information about recent and proposed enhancements to the iShares business, including with respect to capital markets support and analysis, technology, portfolio management, product design and quality, compliance and risk management, global public policy and other services, the Board expected that there would be no diminution in the scope of services required of or provided by BFA under the Advisory Contract for the coming year as compared to the scope of services provided by BFA during prior years. In reviewing the scope of these services, the Board considered BFA’s investment philosophy and experience, noting that BFA and its affiliates have committed significant resources over time, including during the past year, to support the iShares funds and their shareholders. The Board also considered BFA’s compliance program and its compliance record with respect to the Fund. In that regard, the Board noted that BFA reports to the Board about portfolio management and compliance matters on a periodic basis in connection with regularly scheduled meetings of the Board, and on other occasions as necessary and appropriate, and has provided information and made relevant officers and other employees of BFA (and its affiliates) available as needed to provide further assistance with these matters. The Board also reviewed the background and experience of the persons responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund, as well as the resources available to them in managing the Fund. In addition to the above considerations, the Board reviewed and considered detailed presentations regarding BFA’s investment performance, investment and risk management processes and strategies provided at the June 12-14, 2018 meeting and throughout the year, and matters related to BFA’s portfolio compliance policies and procedures.
Based on review of this information, and the performance information discussed above, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund under the Advisory Contract supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Costs of Services Provided to the Fund and Profits Realized by BFA and its Affiliates – The Board reviewed information about the profitability of the iShares complex to BlackRock, based on the fees payable to BFA and its affiliates (including fees under the Advisory Contract), and other sources of revenue and expense to BFA and its affiliates from the iShares funds’ operations for the last calendar year. The Board did not consider the profitability of the Fund to BFA and its affiliates since the Fund had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017. The Board reviewed BlackRock’s profitability methodology for the iShares funds, noting that the 15(c) Committee and the Board had focused on the methodology and profitability presentation during their meetings. The Board noted that the 15(c) Committee had focused on the methodology and profitability presentation during its meetings. The Board further noted that it considered the supplemental information the 15(c) Committee requested, which BlackRock provided, regarding the methodology. The Board discussed the sources of direct and ancillary revenue with management, including the revenues to BTC, a BlackRock affiliate, from securities lending by the iShares funds. The Board noted that it expects to receive profitability information from BFA on at least an annual basis following the Fund’s launch and thus be in a position to evaluate whether any new or additional breakpoints or other adjustments in Fund fees would be appropriate.
Economies of Scale – The Board reviewed information regarding potential economies of scale or other efficiencies that may result from increases in the Fund’s assets, noting that the issue of economies of scale had been focused on by the 15(c) Committee and the Board during their meetings and addressed by management. The 15(c) Committee and the Board received information regarding BlackRock’s historical profitability, including BFA’s and its affiliates’ costs in providing services. The cost information distinguished, among other things, between fixed and variable costs, and showed how the level of fixed and variable costs, as well as the nature of such costs, may impact the existence or size of scale benefits. The 15(c) Committee and the Board reviewed information provided by BFA regarding the sharing of scale benefits with the iShares funds through various means, including, as applicable, through relatively low fee rates established at inception, breakpoints, waivers, or other fee reductions, as well as through additional investment in the iShares business and the provision of improved or additional infrastructure and services to the iShares funds and their shareholders. The Board noted that the Advisory Contract for the Fund did not provide for breakpoints in the Fund’s investment advisory fee rate as the assets of the Fund
| | |
B O A R D R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O F I N V E S T M E N T A D V I S O R Y C O N T R A C T | | 69 |
Board Review and Approval of Investment Advisory Contract (continued)
increase. However, the Board noted that a breakpoint structure for the Fund may be appropriate should material economies of scale exist in the future that are not otherwise shared, and that it would continue to monitor the sharing of economies of scale to determine the appropriateness of adding breakpoints in the future.
Based on this review of the sharing of scale benefits, as well as the other factors considered at the meeting, the Board concluded that the information concerning the sharing of scale benefits supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Fees and Services Provided for Other Comparable Funds/Accounts Managed by BFA and its Affiliates – The Board received and considered information regarding the investment advisory/management fee rates for other funds/accounts in the U.S. for which BFA (or its affiliates) provides investment advisory/management services, including open-end funds registered under the 1940 Act (including sub-advised funds), collective trust funds, and institutional separate accounts (collectively, the “Other Accounts”), and acknowledged BFA’s assertion that the iShares funds are fundamentally different investment vehicles from the Other Accounts. The Board noted that BFA and its affiliates do not manage Other Accounts with a similar investment strategy or investment mandate as the Fund. The Board further noted that BFA provided the Board with detailed information regarding how the Other Accounts generally differ from the Fund, including in terms of the different and generally more extensive services provided to the Fund, as well as other significant differences. In that regard, the Board considered that the pricing of services to institutional clients is typically based on a number of factors beyond the nature and extent of the specific services to be provided and often depends on the overall relationship between the client and its affiliates and the adviser and its affiliates. In addition, the Board considered the relative complexity and inherent risks and challenges of managing and providing other services to the Fund, as a publicly traded ETF, as compared to the Other Accounts, particularly those that are institutional clients, in light of differing regulatory requirements and client-imposed mandates. The Board also acknowledged management’s assertion that, for certain iShares funds, and for client segmentation purposes, BlackRock has launched an iShares fund that may provide a similar investment exposure at a lower investment advisory fee rate. The Board also considered the “all-inclusive” nature of the Fund’s advisory fee structure, and the Fund’s expenses borne by BFA under this arrangement. The Board noted that the investment advisory fee rate under the Advisory Contract for the Fund was generally higher than the investment advisory/management fee rates for certain of the Other Accounts (particularly institutional clients) and concluded that the differences appeared to be consistent with the factors discussed.
Other Benefits to BFA and/or its Affiliates – Except as noted below, the Board did not consider the “fallout” benefits or ancillary revenue to be received by BFA and/or its affiliates in connection with the services to be provided to the Fund by BFA, since the Fund has not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017. The Board reviewed the “fallout” benefits or ancillary revenue received by BFA and/or its affiliates in connection with the services provided to other iShares funds by BFA, such as payment of revenue to BTC, the securities lending agent to the iShares funds, for loaning portfolio securities (which was included in the profit margins reviewed by the Board pursuant to BFA’s profitability methodology), and payment of advisory fees and/or administration fees to BFA (or its affiliates) in connection with any investments by the iShares funds in other funds for which BFA (or its affiliates) provides investment advisory services and/or administration services. The Board also noted the revenue received by BFA and/or its affiliates pursuant to an agreement that permits a service provider to use certain portions of BlackRock’s technology platform to service accounts managed by BFA and/or its affiliates, including the iShares funds. The Board noted that BFA generally does not use soft dollars or consider the value of research or other services that may be provided to BFA (including its affiliates) in selecting brokers for portfolio transactions for the iShares funds. The Board further noted that any portfolio transactions on behalf of the iShares funds placed through a BFA affiliate or purchased from an underwriting syndicate in which a BFA affiliate participates (including associated commissions) are reported to the Board pursuant to Rule 17e-1 or Rule 10f-3, as applicable, under the 1940 Act. The Board concluded that any such ancillary benefits would not be disadvantageous to the Fund and thus would not alter the Board’s conclusion with respect to the appropriateness of approving the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Conclusion – Based on a review of the factors described above, as well as such other factors as deemed appropriate by the Board, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, determined that the Fund’s investment advisory fee rate under the Advisory Contract does not constitute a fee that is so disproportionately large as to bear no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and that could not have been the product of arm’s-length bargaining, and concluded to approve the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
III. iShares Evolved U.S. Financials ETF
Under Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”), including a majority of Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) (the “Independent Trustees”), is required annually to consider and approve the Investment Advisory Contract between the Trust and BFA (the “Advisory Contract”) on behalf of the Fund. The Independent Trustees requested, and BFA provided, such information as the Independent Trustees, with advice from independent counsel, deemed reasonably necessary to evaluate the Advisory Contract. At a meeting on May 11, 2018, a committee composed of all of the Independent Trustees (the “15(c) Committee”), with independent counsel, met with management and reviewed and discussed information provided in response to initial requests of the 15(c) Committee and/or their independent counsel, and requested certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At these meetings, the 15(c) Committee reviewed and discussed information provided in response to the 15(c) Committee’s initial requests, and requested certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At a meeting held on May 24, 2018, management presented additional information to the Board relating to the continuance of the Advisory Contract, including information requested by the 15(c) Committee during its initial meeting. The Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed and discussed such information at length. The Independent Trustees requested from management certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At a meeting held on June 12-14, 2018, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed the additional information provided by management in response to these requests. After extensive discussions, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, approved the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the Fund, based on a review of qualitative and quantitative information provided by BFA. The Board noted its satisfaction with the extent and quality of information provided and its frequent interactions with management, as well as the detailed responses and other information provided by BFA. The Independent Trustees were advised by their independent counsel throughout the process, including about the legal standards applicable to their review. In approving the Advisory Contract for the Fund, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, considered various factors, including: (i) the expenses and performance of the Fund; (ii) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by BFA; (iii) the costs of services provided to the Fund and profits realized by BFA and its affiliates; (iv) economies of scale; (v) the fees and services provided for other
| | |
70 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Board Review and Approval of Investment Advisory Contract (continued)
comparable funds/accounts managed by BFA and its affiliates; and (vi) other benefits to BFA and/or its affiliates. The material factors, no one of which was controlling, and conclusions that formed the basis for the Board, including the Independent Trustees, to approve the Advisory Contract are discussed below.
Expenses and Performance of the Fund – The Board reviewed statistical information prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of investment company data, regarding the expense ratio components, including gross and net total expenses, fees and expenses of another fund in which the Fund invests (if applicable), and waivers/reimbursements (if applicable) of the Fund in comparison with the same information for other ETFs (including, where applicable, funds sponsored by an “at cost” service provider), objectively selected by Broadridge as comprising the Fund’s applicable peer group pursuant to Broadridge’s proprietary ETF methodology (the “Peer Group”). The Board was provided with a detailed description of the proprietary ETF methodology used by Broadridge to determine the Fund’s Peer Group. The Board further noted that due to the limitations in providing comparable funds in the Peer Group, the statistical information provided in Broadridge’s report may or may not provide meaningful direct comparisons to the Fund in all instances.
The Board also noted that the investment advisory fee rate and overall expenses (net of waivers and reimbursements) for the Fund were lower than the median of the investment advisory fee rates and overall expenses (net of waivers and reimbursements) of the funds in its Peer Group, excluding iShares funds.
Because the Fund had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017, the Board did not review any performance information for the Fund.
Based on this review, the other factors considered at the meeting, and their general knowledge of ETF pricing, the Board concluded that the investment advisory fee rate and expense level and the historical performance of the Fund supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided by BFA – Based on management’s representations, including information about recent and proposed enhancements to the iShares business, including with respect to capital markets support and analysis, technology, portfolio management, product design and quality, compliance and risk management, global public policy and other services, the Board expected that there would be no diminution in the scope of services required of or provided by BFA under the Advisory Contract for the coming year as compared to the scope of services provided by BFA during prior years. In reviewing the scope of these services, the Board considered BFA’s investment philosophy and experience, noting that BFA and its affiliates have committed significant resources over time, including during the past year, to support the iShares funds and their shareholders. The Board also considered BFA’s compliance program and its compliance record with respect to the Fund. In that regard, the Board noted that BFA reports to the Board about portfolio management and compliance matters on a periodic basis in connection with regularly scheduled meetings of the Board, and on other occasions as necessary and appropriate, and has provided information and made relevant officers and other employees of BFA (and its affiliates) available as needed to provide further assistance with these matters. The Board also reviewed the background and experience of the persons responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund, as well as the resources available to them in managing the Fund. In addition to the above considerations, the Board reviewed and considered detailed presentations regarding BFA’s investment performance, investment and risk management processes and strategies provided at the June 12-14, 2018 meeting and throughout the year, and matters related to BFA’s portfolio compliance policies and procedures.
Based on review of this information, and the performance information discussed above, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund under the Advisory Contract supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Costs of Services Provided to the Fund and Profits Realized by BFA and its Affiliates – The Board reviewed information about the profitability of the iShares complex to BlackRock, based on the fees payable to BFA and its affiliates (including fees under the Advisory Contract), and other sources of revenue and expense to BFA and its affiliates from the iShares funds’ operations for the last calendar year. The Board did not consider the profitability of the Fund to BFA and its affiliates since the Fund had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017. The Board reviewed BlackRock’s profitability methodology for the iShares funds, noting that the 15(c) Committee and the Board had focused on the methodology and profitability presentation during their meetings. The Board noted that the 15(c) Committee had focused on the methodology and profitability presentation during its meetings. The Board further noted that it considered the supplemental information the 15(c) Committee requested, which BlackRock provided, regarding the methodology. The Board discussed the sources of direct and ancillary revenue with management, including the revenues to BTC, a BlackRock affiliate, from securities lending by the iShares funds. The Board noted that it expects to receive profitability information from BFA on at least an annual basis following the Fund’s launch and thus be in a position to evaluate whether any new or additional breakpoints or other adjustments in Fund fees would be appropriate.
Economies of Scale – The Board reviewed information regarding potential economies of scale or other efficiencies that may result from increases in the Fund’s assets, noting that the issue of economies of scale had been focused on by the 15(c) Committee and the Board during their meetings and addressed by management. The 15(c) Committee and the Board received information regarding BlackRock’s historical profitability, including BFA’s and its affiliates’ costs in providing services. The cost information distinguished, among other things, between fixed and variable costs, and showed how the level of fixed and variable costs, as well as the nature of such costs, may impact the existence or size of scale benefits. The 15(c) Committee and the Board reviewed information provided by BFA regarding the sharing of scale benefits with the iShares funds through various means, including, as applicable, through relatively low fee rates established at inception, breakpoints, waivers, or other fee reductions, as well as through additional investment in the iShares business and the provision of improved or additional infrastructure and services to the iShares funds and their shareholders. The Board noted that the Advisory Contract for the Fund did not provide for breakpoints in the Fund’s investment advisory fee rate as the assets of the Fund increase. However, the Board noted that a breakpoint structure for the Fund may be appropriate should material economies of scale exist in the future that are not otherwise shared, and that it would continue to monitor the sharing of economies of scale to determine the appropriateness of adding breakpoints in the future.
Based on this review of the sharing of scale benefits, as well as the other factors considered at the meeting, the Board concluded that the information concerning the sharing of scale benefits supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Fees and Services Provided for Other Comparable Funds/Accounts Managed by BFA and its Affiliates – The Board received and considered information regarding the investment advisory/management fee rates for other funds/accounts in the U.S. for which BFA (or its affiliates) provides investment advisory/management services, including open-end funds registered under the 1940 Act (including sub-advised funds), collective trust funds, and institutional separate accounts (collectively, the “Other
| | |
B O A R D R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L OF I N V E S T M E N T A D V I S O R Y C O N T R A C T | | 71 |
Board Review and Approval of Investment Advisory Contract (continued)
Accounts”), and acknowledged BFA’s assertion that the iShares funds are fundamentally different investment vehicles from the Other Accounts. The Board noted that BFA and its affiliates do not manage Other Accounts with a similar investment strategy or investment mandate as the Fund. The Board further noted that BFA provided the Board with detailed information regarding how the Other Accounts generally differ from the Fund, including in terms of the different and generally more extensive services provided to the Fund, as well as other significant differences. In that regard, the Board considered that the pricing of services to institutional clients is typically based on a number of factors beyond the nature and extent of the specific services to be provided and often depends on the overall relationship between the client and its affiliates and the adviser and its affiliates. In addition, the Board considered the relative complexity and inherent risks and challenges of managing and providing other services to the Fund, as a publicly traded ETF, as compared to the Other Accounts, particularly those that are institutional clients, in light of differing regulatory requirements and client-imposed mandates. The Board also acknowledged management’s assertion that, for certain iShares funds, and for client segmentation purposes, BlackRock has launched an iShares fund that may provide a similar investment exposure at a lower investment advisory fee rate. The Board also considered the “all-inclusive” nature of the Fund’s advisory fee structure, and the Fund’s expenses borne by BFA under this arrangement. The Board noted that the investment advisory fee rate under the Advisory Contract for the Fund was generally higher than the investment advisory/management fee rates for certain of the Other Accounts (particularly institutional clients) and concluded that the differences appeared to be consistent with the factors discussed.
Other Benefits to BFA and/or its Affiliates – Except as noted below, the Board did not consider the “fallout” benefits or ancillary revenue to be received by BFA and/or its affiliates in connection with the services to be provided to the Fund by BFA, since the Fund has not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017. The Board reviewed the “fallout” benefits or ancillary revenue received by BFA and/or its affiliates in connection with the services provided to other iShares funds by BFA, such as payment of revenue to BTC, the securities lending agent to the iShares funds, for loaning portfolio securities (which was included in the profit margins reviewed by the Board pursuant to BFA’s profitability methodology), and payment of advisory fees and/or administration fees to BFA (or its affiliates) in connection with any investments by the iShares funds in other funds for which BFA (or its affiliates) provides investment advisory services and/or administration services. The Board also noted the revenue received by BFA and/or its affiliates pursuant to an agreement that permits a service provider to use certain portions of BlackRock’s technology platform to service accounts managed by BFA and/or its affiliates, including the iShares funds. The Board noted that BFA generally does not use soft dollars or consider the value of research or other services that may be provided to BFA (including its affiliates) in selecting brokers for portfolio transactions for the iShares funds. The Board further noted that any portfolio transactions on behalf of the iShares funds placed through a BFA affiliate or purchased from an underwriting syndicate in which a BFA affiliate participates (including associated commissions) are reported to the Board pursuant to Rule 17e-1 or Rule 10f-3, as applicable, under the 1940 Act. The Board concluded that any such ancillary benefits would not be disadvantageous to the Fund and thus would not alter the Board’s conclusion with respect to the appropriateness of approving the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Conclusion – Based on a review of the factors described above, as well as such other factors as deemed appropriate by the Board, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, determined that the Fund’s investment advisory fee rate under the Advisory Contract does not constitute a fee that is so disproportionately large as to bear no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and that could not have been the product of arm’s-length bargaining, and concluded to approve the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
IV. iShares Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF
Under Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”), including a majority of Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) (the “Independent Trustees”), is required annually to consider and approve the Investment Advisory Contract between the Trust and BFA (the “Advisory Contract”) on behalf of the Fund. The Independent Trustees requested, and BFA provided, such information as the Independent Trustees, with advice from independent counsel, deemed reasonably necessary to evaluate the Advisory Contract. At a meeting on May 11, 2018, a committee composed of all of the Independent Trustees (the “15(c) Committee”), with independent counsel, met with management and reviewed and discussed information provided in response to initial requests of the 15(c) Committee and/or their independent counsel, and requested certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At these meetings, the 15(c) Committee reviewed and discussed information provided in response to the 15(c) Committee’s initial requests, and requested certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At a meeting held on May 24, 2018, management presented additional information to the Board relating to the continuance of the Advisory Contract, including information requested by the 15(c) Committee during its initial meeting. The Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed and discussed such information at length. The Independent Trustees requested from management certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At a meeting held on June 12-14, 2018, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed the additional information provided by management in response to these requests. After extensive discussions, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, approved the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the Fund, based on a review of qualitative and quantitative information provided by BFA. The Board noted its satisfaction with the extent and quality of information provided and its frequent interactions with management, as well as the detailed responses and other information provided by BFA. The Independent Trustees were advised by their independent counsel throughout the process, including about the legal standards applicable to their review. In approving the Advisory Contract for the Fund, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, considered various factors, including: (i) the expenses and performance of the Fund; (ii) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by BFA; (iii) the costs of services provided to the Fund and profits realized by BFA and its affiliates; (iv) economies of scale; (v) the fees and services provided for other comparable funds/accounts managed by BFA and its affiliates; and (vi) other benefits to BFA and/or its affiliates. The material factors, no one of which was controlling, and conclusions that formed the basis for the Board, including the Independent Trustees, to approve the Advisory Contract are discussed below.
Expenses and Performance of the Fund – The Board reviewed statistical information prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of investment company data, regarding the expense ratio components, including gross and net total expenses, fees and expenses of another fund in which the Fund invests (if applicable), and waivers/reimbursements (if applicable) of the Fund in comparison with the same information for other ETFs (including, where applicable, funds sponsored by an “at cost” service provider), objectively selected by Broadridge as comprising the Fund’s applicable peer group pursuant to Broadridge’s proprietary ETF methodology (the “Peer Group”). The Board was provided with a detailed description of the proprietary ETF methodology used by Broadridge to determine the Fund’s
| | |
72 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Board Review and Approval of Investment Advisory Contract (continued)
Peer Group. The Board further noted that due to the limitations in providing comparable funds in the Peer Group, the statistical information provided in Broadridge’s report may or may not provide meaningful direct comparisons to the Fund in all instances.
The Board also noted that the investment advisory fee rate and overall expenses (net of waivers and reimbursements) for the Fund were lower than the median of the investment advisory fee rates and overall expenses (net of waivers and reimbursements) of the funds in its Peer Group, excluding iShares funds.
Because the Fund had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017, the Board did not review any performance information for the Fund.
Based on this review, the other factors considered at the meeting, and their general knowledge of ETF pricing, the Board concluded that the investment advisory fee rate and expense level and the historical performance of the Fund supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided by BFA – Based on management’s representations, including information about recent and proposed enhancements to the iShares business, including with respect to capital markets support and analysis, technology, portfolio management, product design and quality, compliance and risk management, global public policy and other services, the Board expected that there would be no diminution in the scope of services required of or provided by BFA under the Advisory Contract for the coming year as compared to the scope of services provided by BFA during prior years. In reviewing the scope of these services, the Board considered BFA’s investment philosophy and experience, noting that BFA and its affiliates have committed significant resources over time, including during the past year, to support the iShares funds and their shareholders. The Board also considered BFA’s compliance program and its compliance record with respect to the Fund. In that regard, the Board noted that BFA reports to the Board about portfolio management and compliance matters on a periodic basis in connection with regularly scheduled meetings of the Board, and on other occasions as necessary and appropriate, and has provided information and made relevant officers and other employees of BFA (and its affiliates) available as needed to provide further assistance with these matters. The Board also reviewed the background and experience of the persons responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund, as well as the resources available to them in managing the Fund. In addition to the above considerations, the Board reviewed and considered detailed presentations regarding BFA’s investment performance, investment and risk management processes and strategies provided at the June 12-14, 2018 meeting and throughout the year, and matters related to BFA’s portfolio compliance policies and procedures.
Based on review of this information, and the performance information discussed above, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund under the Advisory Contract supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Costs of Services Provided to the Fund and Profits Realized by BFA and its Affiliates – The Board reviewed information about the profitability of the iShares complex to BlackRock, based on the fees payable to BFA and its affiliates (including fees under the Advisory Contract), and other sources of revenue and expense to BFA and its affiliates from the iShares funds’ operations for the last calendar year. The Board did not consider the profitability of the Fund to BFA and its affiliates since the Fund had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017. The Board reviewed BlackRock’s profitability methodology for the iShares funds, noting that the 15(c) Committee and the Board had focused on the methodology and profitability presentation during their meetings. The Board noted that the 15(c) Committee had focused on the methodology and profitability presentation during its meetings. The Board further noted that it considered the supplemental information the 15(c) Committee requested, which BlackRock provided, regarding the methodology. The Board discussed the sources of direct and ancillary revenue with management, including the revenues to BTC, a BlackRock affiliate, from securities lending by the iShares funds. The Board noted that it expects to receive profitability information from BFA on at least an annual basis following the Fund’s launch and thus be in a position to evaluate whether any new or additional breakpoints or other adjustments in Fund fees would be appropriate.
Economies of Scale – The Board reviewed information regarding potential economies of scale or other efficiencies that may result from increases in the Fund’s assets, noting that the issue of economies of scale had been focused on by the 15(c) Committee and the Board during their meetings and addressed by management. The 15(c) Committee and the Board received information regarding BlackRock’s historical profitability, including BFA’s and its affiliates’ costs in providing services. The cost information distinguished, among other things, between fixed and variable costs, and showed how the level of fixed and variable costs, as well as the nature of such costs, may impact the existence or size of scale benefits. The 15(c) Committee and the Board reviewed information provided by BFA regarding the sharing of scale benefits with the iShares funds through various means, including, as applicable, through relatively low fee rates established at inception, breakpoints, waivers, or other fee reductions, as well as through additional investment in the iShares business and the provision of improved or additional infrastructure and services to the iShares funds and their shareholders. The Board noted that the Advisory Contract for the Fund did not provide for breakpoints in the Fund’s investment advisory fee rate as the assets of the Fund increase. However, the Board noted that a breakpoint structure for the Fund may be appropriate should material economies of scale exist in the future that are not otherwise shared, and that it would continue to monitor the sharing of economies of scale to determine the appropriateness of adding breakpoints in the future.
Based on this review of the sharing of scale benefits, as well as the other factors considered at the meeting, the Board concluded that the information concerning the sharing of scale benefits supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Fees and Services Provided for Other Comparable Funds/Accounts Managed by BFA and its Affiliates – The Board received and considered information regarding the investment advisory/management fee rates for other funds/accounts in the U.S. for which BFA (or its affiliates) provides investment advisory/management services, including open-end funds registered under the 1940 Act (including sub-advised funds), collective trust funds, and institutional separate accounts (collectively, the “Other Accounts”), and acknowledged BFA’s assertion that the iShares funds are fundamentally different investment vehicles from the Other Accounts. The Board noted that BFA and its affiliates do not manage Other Accounts with a similar investment strategy or investment mandate as the Fund. The Board further noted that BFA provided the Board with detailed information regarding how the Other Accounts generally differ from the Fund, including in terms of the different and generally more extensive services provided to the Fund, as well as other significant differences. In that regard, the Board considered that the pricing of services to institutional clients is typically based on a number of factors beyond the nature and extent of the specific services to be provided and often depends on the overall relationship between the client and its affiliates and the adviser and its affiliates. In addition, the Board considered the relative complexity and inherent risks and challenges of managing and providing other services to the Fund, as a publicly traded ETF, as compared to the Other Accounts, particularly those that are institutional clients, in light of differing regulatory requirements and client-imposed mandates. The Board also acknowledged management’s assertion that, for certain iShares funds, and for client segmentation purposes, BlackRock has launched an
| | |
B O A R D R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L OF I N V E S T M E N T A D V I S O R Y C O N T R A C T | | 73 |
Board Review and Approval of Investment Advisory Contract (continued)
iShares fund that may provide a similar investment exposure at a lower investment advisory fee rate. The Board also considered the “all-inclusive” nature of the Fund’s advisory fee structure, and the Fund’s expenses borne by BFA under this arrangement. The Board noted that the investment advisory fee rate under the Advisory Contract for the Fund was generally higher than the investment advisory/management fee rates for certain of the Other Accounts (particularly institutional clients) and concluded that the differences appeared to be consistent with the factors discussed.
Other Benefits to BFA and/or its Affiliates – Except as noted below, the Board did not consider the “fallout” benefits or ancillary revenue to be received by BFA and/or its affiliates in connection with the services to be provided to the Fund by BFA, since the Fund has not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017. The Board reviewed the “fallout” benefits or ancillary revenue received by BFA and/or its affiliates in connection with the services provided to other iShares funds by BFA, such as payment of revenue to BTC, the securities lending agent to the iShares funds, for loaning portfolio securities (which was included in the profit margins reviewed by the Board pursuant to BFA’s profitability methodology), and payment of advisory fees and/or administration fees to BFA (or its affiliates) in connection with any investments by the iShares funds in other funds for which BFA (or its affiliates) provides investment advisory services and/or administration services. The Board also noted the revenue received by BFA and/or its affiliates pursuant to an agreement that permits a service provider to use certain portions of BlackRock’s technology platform to service accounts managed by BFA and/or its affiliates, including the iShares funds. The Board noted that BFA generally does not use soft dollars or consider the value of research or other services that may be provided to BFA (including its affiliates) in selecting brokers for portfolio transactions for the iShares funds. The Board further noted that any portfolio transactions on behalf of the iShares funds placed through a BFA affiliate or purchased from an underwriting syndicate in which a BFA affiliate participates (including associated commissions) are reported to the Board pursuant to Rule 17e-1 or Rule 10f-3, as applicable, under the 1940 Act. The Board concluded that any such ancillary benefits would not be disadvantageous to the Fund and thus would not alter the Board’s conclusion with respect to the appropriateness of approving the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Conclusion – Based on a review of the factors described above, as well as such other factors as deemed appropriate by the Board, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, determined that the Fund’s investment advisory fee rate under the Advisory Contract does not constitute a fee that is so disproportionately large as to bear no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and that could not have been the product of arm’s-length bargaining, and concluded to approve the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
V. iShares Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF
Under Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”), including a majority of Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) (the “Independent Trustees”), is required annually to consider and approve the Investment Advisory Contract between the Trust and BFA (the “Advisory Contract”) on behalf of the Fund. The Independent Trustees requested, and BFA provided, such information as the Independent Trustees, with advice from independent counsel, deemed reasonably necessary to evaluate the Advisory Contract. At a meeting on May 11, 2018, a committee composed of all of the Independent Trustees (the “15(c) Committee”), with independent counsel, met with management and reviewed and discussed information provided in response to initial requests of the 15(c) Committee and/or their independent counsel, and requested certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At these meetings, the 15(c) Committee reviewed and discussed information provided in response to the 15(c) Committee’s initial requests, and requested certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At a meeting held on May 24, 2018, management presented additional information to the Board relating to the continuance of the Advisory Contract, including information requested by the 15(c) Committee during its initial meeting. The Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed and discussed such information at length. The Independent Trustees requested from management certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At a meeting held on June 12-14, 2018, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed the additional information provided by management in response to these requests. After extensive discussions, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, approved the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the Fund, based on a review of qualitative and quantitative information provided by BFA. The Board noted its satisfaction with the extent and quality of information provided and its frequent interactions with management, as well as the detailed responses and other information provided by BFA. The Independent Trustees were advised by their independent counsel throughout the process, including about the legal standards applicable to their review. In approving the Advisory Contract for the Fund, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, considered various factors, including: (i) the expenses and performance of the Fund; (ii) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by BFA; (iii) the costs of services provided to the Fund and profits realized by BFA and its affiliates; (iv) economies of scale; (v) the fees and services provided for other comparable funds/accounts managed by BFA and its affiliates; and (vi) other benefits to BFA and/or its affiliates. The material factors, no one of which was controlling, and conclusions that formed the basis for the Board, including the Independent Trustees, to approve the Advisory Contract are discussed below.
Expenses and Performance of the Fund – The Board reviewed statistical information prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of investment company data, regarding the expense ratio components, including gross and net total expenses, fees and expenses of another fund in which the Fund invests (if applicable), and waivers/reimbursements (if applicable) of the Fund in comparison with the same information for other ETFs (including, where applicable, funds sponsored by an “at cost” service provider), objectively selected by Broadridge as comprising the Fund’s applicable peer group pursuant to Broadridge’s proprietary ETF methodology (the “Peer Group”). The Board was provided with a detailed description of the proprietary ETF methodology used by Broadridge to determine the Fund’s Peer Group. The Board further noted that due to the limitations in providing comparable funds in the Peer Group, the statistical information provided in Broadridge’s report may or may not provide meaningful direct comparisons to the Fund in all instances.
The Board also noted that the investment advisory fee rate and overall expenses (net of waivers and reimbursements) for the Fund were lower than the median of the investment advisory fee rates and overall expenses (net of waivers and reimbursements) of the funds in its Peer Group, excluding iShares funds.
Because the Fund had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017, the Board did not review any performance information for the Fund.
Based on this review, the other factors considered at the meeting, and their general knowledge of ETF pricing, the Board concluded that the investment advisory fee rate and expense level and the historical performance of the Fund supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
| | |
74 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Board Review and Approval of Investment Advisory Contract (continued)
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided by BFA – Based on management’s representations, including information about recent and proposed enhancements to the iShares business, including with respect to capital markets support and analysis, technology, portfolio management, product design and quality, compliance and risk management, global public policy and other services, the Board expected that there would be no diminution in the scope of services required of or provided by BFA under the Advisory Contract for the coming year as compared to the scope of services provided by BFA during prior years. In reviewing the scope of these services, the Board considered BFA’s investment philosophy and experience, noting that BFA and its affiliates have committed significant resources over time, including during the past year, to support the iShares funds and their shareholders. The Board also considered BFA’s compliance program and its compliance record with respect to the Fund. In that regard, the Board noted that BFA reports to the Board about portfolio management and compliance matters on a periodic basis in connection with regularly scheduled meetings of the Board, and on other occasions as necessary and appropriate, and has provided information and made relevant officers and other employees of BFA (and its affiliates) available as needed to provide further assistance with these matters. The Board also reviewed the background and experience of the persons responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund, as well as the resources available to them in managing the Fund. In addition to the above considerations, the Board reviewed and considered detailed presentations regarding BFA’s investment performance, investment and risk management processes and strategies provided at the June 12-14, 2018 meeting and throughout the year, and matters related to BFA’s portfolio compliance policies and procedures.
Based on review of this information, and the performance information discussed above, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund under the Advisory Contract supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Costs of Services Provided to the Fund and Profits Realized by BFA and its Affiliates – The Board reviewed information about the profitability of the iShares complex to BlackRock, based on the fees payable to BFA and its affiliates (including fees under the Advisory Contract), and other sources of revenue and expense to BFA and its affiliates from the iShares funds’ operations for the last calendar year. The Board did not consider the profitability of the Fund to BFA and its affiliates since the Fund had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017. The Board reviewed BlackRock’s profitability methodology for the iShares funds, noting that the 15(c) Committee and the Board had focused on the methodology and profitability presentation during their meetings. The Board noted that the 15(c) Committee had focused on the methodology and profitability presentation during its meetings. The Board further noted that it considered the supplemental information the 15(c) Committee requested, which BlackRock provided, regarding the methodology. The Board discussed the sources of direct and ancillary revenue with management, including the revenues to BTC, a BlackRock affiliate, from securities lending by the iShares funds. The Board noted that it expects to receive profitability information from BFA on at least an annual basis following the Fund’s launch and thus be in a position to evaluate whether any new or additional breakpoints or other adjustments in Fund fees would be appropriate.
Economies of Scale – The Board reviewed information regarding potential economies of scale or other efficiencies that may result from increases in the Fund’s assets, noting that the issue of economies of scale had been focused on by the 15(c) Committee and the Board during their meetings and addressed by management. The 15(c) Committee and the Board received information regarding BlackRock’s historical profitability, including BFA’s and its affiliates’ costs in providing services. The cost information distinguished, among other things, between fixed and variable costs, and showed how the level of fixed and variable costs, as well as the nature of such costs, may impact the existence or size of scale benefits. The 15(c) Committee and the Board reviewed information provided by BFA regarding the sharing of scale benefits with the iShares funds through various means, including, as applicable, through relatively low fee rates established at inception, breakpoints, waivers, or other fee reductions, as well as through additional investment in the iShares business and the provision of improved or additional infrastructure and services to the iShares funds and their shareholders. The Board noted that the Advisory Contract for the Fund did not provide for breakpoints in the Fund’s investment advisory fee rate as the assets of the Fund increase. However, the Board noted that a breakpoint structure for the Fund may be appropriate should material economies of scale exist in the future that are not otherwise shared, and that it would continue to monitor the sharing of economies of scale to determine the appropriateness of adding breakpoints in the future.
Based on this review of the sharing of scale benefits, as well as the other factors considered at the meeting, the Board concluded that the information concerning the sharing of scale benefits supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Fees and Services Provided for Other Comparable Funds/Accounts Managed by BFA and its Affiliates – The Board received and considered information regarding the investment advisory/management fee rates for other funds/accounts in the U.S. for which BFA (or its affiliates) provides investment advisory/management services, including open-end funds registered under the 1940 Act (including sub-advised funds), collective trust funds, and institutional separate accounts (collectively, the “Other Accounts”), and acknowledged BFA’s assertion that the iShares funds are fundamentally different investment vehicles from the Other Accounts. The Board noted that BFA and its affiliates do not manage Other Accounts with a similar investment strategy or investment mandate as the Fund. The Board further noted that BFA provided the Board with detailed information regarding how the Other Accounts generally differ from the Fund, including in terms of the different and generally more extensive services provided to the Fund, as well as other significant differences. In that regard, the Board considered that the pricing of services to institutional clients is typically based on a number of factors beyond the nature and extent of the specific services to be provided and often depends on the overall relationship between the client and its affiliates and the adviser and its affiliates. In addition, the Board considered the relative complexity and inherent risks and challenges of managing and providing other services to the Fund, as a publicly traded ETF, as compared to the Other Accounts, particularly those that are institutional clients, in light of differing regulatory requirements and client-imposed mandates. The Board also acknowledged management’s assertion that, for certain iShares funds, and for client segmentation purposes, BlackRock has launched an iShares fund that may provide a similar investment exposure at a lower investment advisory fee rate. The Board also considered the “all-inclusive” nature of the Fund’s advisory fee structure, and the Fund’s expenses borne by BFA under this arrangement. The Board noted that the investment advisory fee rate under the Advisory Contract for the Fund was generally higher than the investment advisory/management fee rates for certain of the Other Accounts (particularly institutional clients) and concluded that the differences appeared to be consistent with the factors discussed.
Other Benefits to BFA and/or its Affiliates – Except as noted below, the Board did not consider the “fallout” benefits or ancillary revenue to be received by BFA and/or its affiliates in connection with the services to be provided to the Fund by BFA, since the Fund has not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017. The Board reviewed the “fallout” benefits or ancillary revenue received by BFA and/or its affiliates in connection with the services provided to other iShares funds by BFA, such as payment of revenue to BTC, the securities lending agent to the iShares funds, for loaning portfolio securities (which was included in the profit margins reviewed by the Board pursuant to BFA’s profitability methodology), and payment of advisory fees and/or administration fees to BFA (or its affiliates) in connection with any investments by the iShares funds
| | |
B O A R D R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O F I N V E S T M E N T A D V I S O R Y C O N T R A C T | | 75 |
Board Review and Approval of Investment Advisory Contract (continued)
in other funds for which BFA (or its affiliates) provides investment advisory services and/or administration services. The Board also noted the revenue received by BFA and/or its affiliates pursuant to an agreement that permits a service provider to use certain portions of BlackRock’s technology platform to service accounts managed by BFA and/or its affiliates, including the iShares funds. The Board noted that BFA generally does not use soft dollars or consider the value of research or other services that may be provided to BFA (including its affiliates) in selecting brokers for portfolio transactions for the iShares funds. The Board further noted that any portfolio transactions on behalf of the iShares funds placed through a BFA affiliate or purchased from an underwriting syndicate in which a BFA affiliate participates (including associated commissions) are reported to the Board pursuant to Rule 17e-1 or Rule 10f-3, as applicable, under the 1940 Act. The Board concluded that any such ancillary benefits would not be disadvantageous to the Fund and thus would not alter the Board’s conclusion with respect to the appropriateness of approving the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Conclusion – Based on a review of the factors described above, as well as such other factors as deemed appropriate by the Board, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, determined that the Fund’s investment advisory fee rate under the Advisory Contract does not constitute a fee that is so disproportionately large as to bear no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and that could not have been the product of arm’s-length bargaining, and concluded to approve the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
VI. iShares Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment ETF
Under Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”), including a majority of Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) (the “Independent Trustees”), is required annually to consider and approve the Investment Advisory Contract between the Trust and BFA (the “Advisory Contract”) on behalf of the Fund. The Independent Trustees requested, and BFA provided, such information as the Independent Trustees, with advice from independent counsel, deemed reasonably necessary to evaluate the Advisory Contract. At a meeting on May 11, 2018, a committee composed of all of the Independent Trustees (the “15(c) Committee”), with independent counsel, met with management and reviewed and discussed information provided in response to initial requests of the 15(c) Committee and/or their independent counsel, and requested certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At these meetings, the 15(c) Committee reviewed and discussed information provided in response to the 15(c) Committee’s initial requests, and requested certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At a meeting held on May 24, 2018, management presented additional information to the Board relating to the continuance of the Advisory Contract, including information requested by the 15(c) Committee during its initial meeting. The Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed and discussed such information at length. The Independent Trustees requested from management certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At a meeting held on June 12-14, 2018, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed the additional information provided by management in response to these requests. After extensive discussions, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, approved the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the Fund, based on a review of qualitative and quantitative information provided by BFA. The Board noted its satisfaction with the extent and quality of information provided and its frequent interactions with management, as well as the detailed responses and other information provided by BFA. The Independent Trustees were advised by their independent counsel throughout the process, including about the legal standards applicable to their review. In approving the Advisory Contract for the Fund, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, considered various factors, including: (i) the expenses and performance of the Fund; (ii) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by BFA; (iii) the costs of services provided to the Fund and profits realized by BFA and its affiliates; (iv) economies of scale; (v) the fees and services provided for other comparable funds/accounts managed by BFA and its affiliates; and (vi) other benefits to BFA and/or its affiliates. The material factors, no one of which was controlling, and conclusions that formed the basis for the Board, including the Independent Trustees, to approve the Advisory Contract are discussed below.
Expenses and Performance of the Fund – The Board reviewed statistical information prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of investment company data, regarding the expense ratio components, including gross and net total expenses, fees and expenses of another fund in which the Fund invests (if applicable), and waivers/reimbursements (if applicable) of the Fund in comparison with the same information for other ETFs (including, where applicable, funds sponsored by an “at cost” service provider), objectively selected by Broadridge as comprising the Fund’s applicable peer group pursuant to Broadridge’s proprietary ETF methodology (the “Peer Group”). The Board was provided with a detailed description of the proprietary ETF methodology used by Broadridge to determine the Fund’s Peer Group. The Board further noted that due to the limitations in providing comparable funds in the Peer Group, the statistical information provided in Broadridge’s report may or may not provide meaningful direct comparisons to the Fund in all instances.
The Board also noted that the investment advisory fee rate and overall expenses (net of waivers and reimbursements) for the Fund were lower than the median of the investment advisory fee rates and overall expenses (net of waivers and reimbursements) of the funds in its Peer Group, excluding iShares funds.
Because the Fund had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017, the Board did not review any performance information for the Fund.
Based on this review, the other factors considered at the meeting, and their general knowledge of ETF pricing, the Board concluded that the investment advisory fee rate and expense level and the historical performance of the Fund supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided by BFA – Based on management’s representations, including information about recent and proposed enhancements to the iShares business, including with respect to capital markets support and analysis, technology, portfolio management, product design and quality, compliance and risk management, global public policy and other services, the Board expected that there would be no diminution in the scope of services required of or provided by BFA under the Advisory Contract for the coming year as compared to the scope of services provided by BFA during prior years. In reviewing the scope of these services, the Board considered BFA’s investment philosophy and experience, noting that BFA and its affiliates have committed significant resources over time, including during the past year, to support the iShares funds and their shareholders. The Board also considered BFA’s compliance program and its compliance record with respect to the Fund. In that regard, the Board noted that BFA reports to the Board about portfolio management and compliance matters on a periodic basis in connection with regularly scheduled meetings of the Board, and on other occasions as necessary and appropriate, and has provided information and made relevant officers and other employees of BFA (and its affiliates) available as needed to provide further assistance with these matters. The Board also reviewed the background and experience of the persons responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund, as well as the resources available to them in managing the Fund. In addition to the above considerations, the Board reviewed and
| | |
76 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Board Review and Approval of Investment Advisory Contract (continued)
considered detailed presentations regarding BFA’s investment performance, investment and risk management processes and strategies provided at the June 12-14, 2018 meeting and throughout the year, and matters related to BFA’s portfolio compliance policies and procedures.
Based on review of this information, and the performance information discussed above, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund under the Advisory Contract supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Costs of Services Provided to the Fund and Profits Realized by BFA and its Affiliates – The Board reviewed information about the profitability of the iShares complex to BlackRock, based on the fees payable to BFA and its affiliates (including fees under the Advisory Contract), and other sources of revenue and expense to BFA and its affiliates from the iShares funds’ operations for the last calendar year. The Board did not consider the profitability of the Fund to BFA and its affiliates since the Fund had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017. The Board reviewed BlackRock’s profitability methodology for the iShares funds, noting that the 15(c) Committee and the Board had focused on the methodology and profitability presentation during their meetings. The Board noted that the 15(c) Committee had focused on the methodology and profitability presentation during its meetings. The Board further noted that it considered the supplemental information the 15(c) Committee requested, which BlackRock provided, regarding the methodology. The Board discussed the sources of direct and ancillary revenue with management, including the revenues to BTC, a BlackRock affiliate, from securities lending by the iShares funds. The Board noted that it expects to receive profitability information from BFA on at least an annual basis following the Fund’s launch and thus be in a position to evaluate whether any new or additional breakpoints or other adjustments in Fund fees would be appropriate.
Economies of Scale – The Board reviewed information regarding potential economies of scale or other efficiencies that may result from increases in the Fund’s assets, noting that the issue of economies of scale had been focused on by the 15(c) Committee and the Board during their meetings and addressed by management. The 15(c) Committee and the Board received information regarding BlackRock’s historical profitability, including BFA’s and its affiliates’ costs in providing services. The cost information distinguished, among other things, between fixed and variable costs, and showed how the level of fixed and variable costs, as well as the nature of such costs, may impact the existence or size of scale benefits. The 15(c) Committee and the Board reviewed information provided by BFA regarding the sharing of scale benefits with the iShares funds through various means, including, as applicable, through relatively low fee rates established at inception, breakpoints, waivers, or other fee reductions, as well as through additional investment in the iShares business and the provision of improved or additional infrastructure and services to the iShares funds and their shareholders. The Board noted that the Advisory Contract for the Fund did not provide for breakpoints in the Fund’s investment advisory fee rate as the assets of the Fund increase. However, the Board noted that a breakpoint structure for the Fund may be appropriate should material economies of scale exist in the future that are not otherwise shared, and that it would continue to monitor the sharing of economies of scale to determine the appropriateness of adding breakpoints in the future.
Based on this review of the sharing of scale benefits, as well as the other factors considered at the meeting, the Board concluded that the information concerning the sharing of scale benefits supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Fees and Services Provided for Other Comparable Funds/Accounts Managed by BFA and its Affiliates – The Board received and considered information regarding the investment advisory/management fee rates for other funds/accounts in the U.S. for which BFA (or its affiliates) provides investment advisory/management services, including open-end funds registered under the 1940 Act (including sub-advised funds), collective trust funds, and institutional separate accounts (collectively, the “Other Accounts”), and acknowledged BFA’s assertion that the iShares funds are fundamentally different investment vehicles from the Other Accounts. The Board noted that BFA and its affiliates do not manage Other Accounts with a similar investment strategy or investment mandate as the Fund. The Board further noted that BFA provided the Board with detailed information regarding how the Other Accounts generally differ from the Fund, including in terms of the different and generally more extensive services provided to the Fund, as well as other significant differences. In that regard, the Board considered that the pricing of services to institutional clients is typically based on a number of factors beyond the nature and extent of the specific services to be provided and often depends on the overall relationship between the client and its affiliates and the adviser and its affiliates. In addition, the Board considered the relative complexity and inherent risks and challenges of managing and providing other services to the Fund, as a publicly traded ETF, as compared to the Other Accounts, particularly those that are institutional clients, in light of differing regulatory requirements and client-imposed mandates. The Board also acknowledged management’s assertion that, for certain iShares funds, and for client segmentation purposes, BlackRock has launched an iShares fund that may provide a similar investment exposure at a lower investment advisory fee rate. The Board also considered the “all-inclusive” nature of the Fund’s advisory fee structure, and the Fund’s expenses borne by BFA under this arrangement. The Board noted that the investment advisory fee rate under the Advisory Contract for the Fund was generally higher than the investment advisory/management fee rates for certain of the Other Accounts (particularly institutional clients) and concluded that the differences appeared to be consistent with the factors discussed.
Other Benefits to BFA and/or its Affiliates – Except as noted below, the Board did not consider the “fallout” benefits or ancillary revenue to be received by BFA and/or its affiliates in connection with the services to be provided to the Fund by BFA, since the Fund has not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017. The Board reviewed the “fallout” benefits or ancillary revenue received by BFA and/or its affiliates in connection with the services provided to other iShares funds by BFA, such as payment of revenue to BTC, the securities lending agent to the iShares funds, for loaning portfolio securities (which was included in the profit margins reviewed by the Board pursuant to BFA’s profitability methodology), and payment of advisory fees and/or administration fees to BFA (or its affiliates) in connection with any investments by the iShares funds in other funds for which BFA (or its affiliates) provides investment advisory services and/or administration services. The Board also noted the revenue received by BFA and/or its affiliates pursuant to an agreement that permits a service provider to use certain portions of BlackRock’s technology platform to service accounts managed by BFA and/or its affiliates, including the iShares funds. The Board noted that BFA generally does not use soft dollars or consider the value of research or other services that may be provided to BFA (including its affiliates) in selecting brokers for portfolio transactions for the iShares funds. The Board further noted that any portfolio transactions on behalf of the iShares funds placed through a BFA affiliate or purchased from an underwriting syndicate in which a BFA affiliate participates (including associated commissions) are reported to the Board pursuant to Rule 17e-1 or Rule 10f-3, as applicable, under the 1940 Act. The Board concluded that any such ancillary benefits would not be disadvantageous to the Fund and thus would not alter the Board’s conclusion with respect to the appropriateness of approving the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Conclusion – Based on a review of the factors described above, as well as such other factors as deemed appropriate by the Board, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, determined that the Fund’s investment advisory fee rate under the Advisory Contract does not constitute a fee that is so disproportionately large as
| | |
B O A R D R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L O F I N V E S T M E N T A D V I S O R Y C O N T R A C T | | 77 |
Board Review and Approval of Investment Advisory Contract (continued)
to bear no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and that could not have been the product of arm’s-length bargaining, and concluded to approve the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
VII. iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF
Under Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”), including a majority of Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) (the “Independent Trustees”), is required annually to consider and approve the Investment Advisory Contract between the Trust and BFA (the “Advisory Contract”) on behalf of the Fund. The Independent Trustees requested, and BFA provided, such information as the Independent Trustees, with advice from independent counsel, deemed reasonably necessary to evaluate the Advisory Contract. At a meeting on May 11, 2018, a committee composed of all of the Independent Trustees (the “15(c) Committee”), with independent counsel, met with management and reviewed and discussed information provided in response to initial requests of the 15(c) Committee and/or their independent counsel, and requested certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At these meetings, the 15(c) Committee reviewed and discussed information provided in response to the 15(c) Committee’s initial requests, and requested certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At a meeting held on May 24, 2018, management presented additional information to the Board relating to the continuance of the Advisory Contract, including information requested by the 15(c) Committee during its initial meeting. The Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed and discussed such information at length. The Independent Trustees requested from management certain additional information, which management agreed to provide. At a meeting held on June 12-14, 2018, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, reviewed the additional information provided by management in response to these requests. After extensive discussions, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, approved the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the Fund, based on a review of qualitative and quantitative information provided by BFA. The Board noted its satisfaction with the extent and quality of information provided and its frequent interactions with management, as well as the detailed responses and other information provided by BFA. The Independent Trustees were advised by their independent counsel throughout the process, including about the legal standards applicable to their review. In approving the Advisory Contract for the Fund, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, considered various factors, including: (i) the expenses and performance of the Fund; (ii) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by BFA; (iii) the costs of services provided to the Fund and profits realized by BFA and its affiliates; (iv) economies of scale; (v) the fees and services provided for other comparable funds/accounts managed by BFA and its affiliates; and (vi) other benefits to BFA and/or its affiliates. The material factors, no one of which was controlling, and conclusions that formed the basis for the Board, including the Independent Trustees, to approve the Advisory Contract are discussed below.
Expenses and Performance of the Fund – The Board reviewed statistical information prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of investment company data, regarding the expense ratio components, including gross and net total expenses, fees and expenses of another fund in which the Fund invests (if applicable), and waivers/reimbursements (if applicable) of the Fund in comparison with the same information for other ETFs (including, where applicable, funds sponsored by an “at cost” service provider), objectively selected by Broadridge as comprising the Fund’s applicable peer group pursuant to Broadridge’s proprietary ETF methodology (the “Peer Group”). The Board was provided with a detailed description of the proprietary ETF methodology used by Broadridge to determine the Fund’s Peer Group. The Board further noted that due to the limitations in providing comparable funds in the Peer Group, the statistical information provided in Broadridge’s report may or may not provide meaningful direct comparisons to the Fund in all instances.
The Board also noted that the investment advisory fee rate and overall expenses (net of waivers and reimbursements) for the Fund were lower than the median of the investment advisory fee rates and overall expenses (net of waivers and reimbursements) of the funds in its Peer Group, excluding iShares funds.
Because the Fund had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017, the Board did not review any performance information for the Fund.
Based on this review, the other factors considered at the meeting, and their general knowledge of ETF pricing, the Board concluded that the investment advisory fee rate and expense level and the historical performance of the Fund supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided by BFA – Based on management’s representations, including information about recent and proposed enhancements to the iShares business, including with respect to capital markets support and analysis, technology, portfolio management, product design and quality, compliance and risk management, global public policy and other services, the Board expected that there would be no diminution in the scope of services required of or provided by BFA under the Advisory Contract for the coming year as compared to the scope of services provided by BFA during prior years. In reviewing the scope of these services, the Board considered BFA’s investment philosophy and experience, noting that BFA and its affiliates have committed significant resources over time, including during the past year, to support the iShares funds and their shareholders. The Board also considered BFA’s compliance program and its compliance record with respect to the Fund. In that regard, the Board noted that BFA reports to the Board about portfolio management and compliance matters on a periodic basis in connection with regularly scheduled meetings of the Board, and on other occasions as necessary and appropriate, and has provided information and made relevant officers and other employees of BFA (and its affiliates) available as needed to provide further assistance with these matters. The Board also reviewed the background and experience of the persons responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund, as well as the resources available to them in managing the Fund. In addition to the above considerations, the Board reviewed and considered detailed presentations regarding BFA’s investment performance, investment and risk management processes and strategies provided at the June 12-14, 2018 meeting and throughout the year, and matters related to BFA’s portfolio compliance policies and procedures.
Based on review of this information, and the performance information discussed above, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund under the Advisory Contract supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Costs of Services Provided to the Fund and Profits Realized by BFA and its Affiliates – The Board reviewed information about the profitability of the iShares complex to BlackRock, based on the fees payable to BFA and its affiliates (including fees under the Advisory Contract), and other sources of revenue and expense to BFA and its affiliates from the iShares funds’ operations for the last calendar year. The Board did not consider the profitability of the Fund to BFA and its affiliates since the Fund had not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017. The Board reviewed BlackRock’s profitability methodology for the iShares funds, noting that the 15(c) Committee and the Board had focused on the methodology and profitability presentation during their meetings. The Board noted that the 15(c) Committee had focused on the methodology
| | |
78 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Board Review and Approval of Investment Advisory Contract (continued)
and profitability presentation during its meetings. The Board further noted that it considered the supplemental information the 15(c) Committee requested, which BlackRock provided, regarding the methodology. The Board discussed the sources of direct and ancillary revenue with management, including the revenues to BTC, a BlackRock affiliate, from securities lending by the iShares funds. The Board noted that it expects to receive profitability information from BFA on at least an annual basis following the Fund’s launch and thus be in a position to evaluate whether any new or additional breakpoints or other adjustments in Fund fees would be appropriate.
Economies of Scale – The Board reviewed information regarding potential economies of scale or other efficiencies that may result from increases in the Fund’s assets, noting that the issue of economies of scale had been focused on by the 15(c) Committee and the Board during their meetings and addressed by management. The 15(c) Committee and the Board received information regarding BlackRock’s historical profitability, including BFA’s and its affiliates’ costs in providing services. The cost information distinguished, among other things, between fixed and variable costs, and showed how the level of fixed and variable costs, as well as the nature of such costs, may impact the existence or size of scale benefits. The 15(c) Committee and the Board reviewed information provided by BFA regarding the sharing of scale benefits with the iShares funds through various means, including, as applicable, through relatively low fee rates established at inception, breakpoints, waivers, or other fee reductions, as well as through additional investment in the iShares business and the provision of improved or additional infrastructure and services to the iShares funds and their shareholders. The Board noted that the Advisory Contract for the Fund did not provide for breakpoints in the Fund’s investment advisory fee rate as the assets of the Fund increase. However, the Board noted that a breakpoint structure for the Fund may be appropriate should material economies of scale exist in the future that are not otherwise shared, and that it would continue to monitor the sharing of economies of scale to determine the appropriateness of adding breakpoints in the future.
Based on this review of the sharing of scale benefits, as well as the other factors considered at the meeting, the Board concluded that the information concerning the sharing of scale benefits supported the Board’s approval of the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Fees and Services Provided for Other Comparable Funds/Accounts Managed by BFA and its Affiliates – The Board received and considered information regarding the investment advisory/management fee rates for other funds/accounts in the U.S. for which BFA (or its affiliates) provides investment advisory/management services, including open-end funds registered under the 1940 Act (including sub-advised funds), collective trust funds, and institutional separate accounts (collectively, the “Other Accounts”), and acknowledged BFA’s assertion that the iShares funds are fundamentally different investment vehicles from the Other Accounts. The Board noted that BFA and its affiliates do not manage Other Accounts with a similar investment strategy or investment mandate as the Fund. The Board further noted that BFA provided the Board with detailed information regarding how the Other Accounts generally differ from the Fund, including in terms of the different and generally more extensive services provided to the Fund, as well as other significant differences. In that regard, the Board considered that the pricing of services to institutional clients is typically based on a number of factors beyond the nature and extent of the specific services to be provided and often depends on the overall relationship between the client and its affiliates and the adviser and its affiliates. In addition, the Board considered the relative complexity and inherent risks and challenges of managing and providing other services to the Fund, as a publicly traded ETF, as compared to the Other Accounts, particularly those that are institutional clients, in light of differing regulatory requirements and client-imposed mandates. The Board also acknowledged management’s assertion that, for certain iShares funds, and for client segmentation purposes, BlackRock has launched an iShares fund that may provide a similar investment exposure at a lower investment advisory fee rate. The Board also considered the “all-inclusive” nature of the Fund’s advisory fee structure, and the Fund’s expenses borne by BFA under this arrangement. The Board noted that the investment advisory fee rate under the Advisory Contract for the Fund was generally higher than the investment advisory/management fee rates for certain of the Other Accounts (particularly institutional clients) and concluded that the differences appeared to be consistent with the factors discussed.
Other Benefits to BFA and/or its Affiliates – Except as noted below, the Board did not consider the “fallout” benefits or ancillary revenue to be received by BFA and/or its affiliates in connection with the services to be provided to the Fund by BFA, since the Fund has not commenced operations as of December 31, 2017. The Board reviewed the “fallout” benefits or ancillary revenue received by BFA and/or its affiliates in connection with the services provided to other iShares funds by BFA, such as payment of revenue to BTC, the securities lending agent to the iShares funds, for loaning portfolio securities (which was included in the profit margins reviewed by the Board pursuant to BFA’s profitability methodology), and payment of advisory fees and/or administration fees to BFA (or its affiliates) in connection with any investments by the iShares funds in other funds for which BFA (or its affiliates) provides investment advisory services and/or administration services. The Board also noted the revenue received by BFA and/or its affiliates pursuant to an agreement that permits a service provider to use certain portions of BlackRock’s technology platform to service accounts managed by BFA and/or its affiliates, including the iShares funds. The Board noted that BFA generally does not use soft dollars or consider the value of research or other services that may be provided to BFA (including its affiliates) in selecting brokers for portfolio transactions for the iShares funds. The Board further noted that any portfolio transactions on behalf of the iShares funds placed through a BFA affiliate or purchased from an underwriting syndicate in which a BFA affiliate participates (including associated commissions) are reported to the Board pursuant to Rule 17e-1 or Rule 10f-3, as applicable, under the 1940 Act. The Board concluded that any such ancillary benefits would not be disadvantageous to the Fund and thus would not alter the Board’s conclusion with respect to the appropriateness of approving the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
Conclusion – Based on a review of the factors described above, as well as such other factors as deemed appropriate by the Board, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, determined that the Fund’s investment advisory fee rate under the Advisory Contract does not constitute a fee that is so disproportionately large as to bear no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and that could not have been the product of arm’s-length bargaining, and concluded to approve the continuance of the Advisory Contract for the coming year.
| | |
B O A R D R E V I E W A N D A P P R O V A L OF I N V E S T M E N T A D V I S O R Y C O N T R A C T | | 79 |
Supplemental Information (unaudited)
Premium/Discount Information
The Premium/Discount Information section is intended to present information about the differences between the daily market price on secondary markets for shares of a fund and that fund’s NAV. NAV is the price at which a fund issues and redeems shares. It is calculated in accordance with the standard formula for valuing mutual fund shares. The “Market Price” of a fund generally is determined using the midpoint between the highest bid and the lowest ask on the primary securities exchange on which shares of such fund are listed for trading, as of the time that a fund’s NAV is calculated. A fund’s Market Price may be at, above or below its NAV. The NAV of a fund will fluctuate with changes in the value of its portfolio holdings. The Market Price of a fund will fluctuate in accordance with changes in its NAV, as well as market supply and demand.
Premiums or discounts are the differences (expressed as a percentage) between the NAV and Market Price of a fund on a given day, generally at the time the NAV is calculated. A premium is the amount that a fund is trading above the reported NAV, expressed as a percentage of the NAV. A discount is the amount that a fund is trading below the reported NAV, expressed as a percentage of the NAV.
Premium/discount information for the Funds covering the most recently completed calendar year and the most recently completed calendar quarters since that year (or since the Fund began trading, if shorter) is publicly accessible, free of charge, at www.iShares.com.
The following information shows the frequency of distributions of premiums and discounts for the Funds for the immediately preceding five calendar years (or from the date a Fund began trading on the secondary market, if less than five years) through the date of the most recent calendar quarter-end. Each line in each table shows the number of trading days in which the Fund traded within the premium/discount range indicated. Premium/discount ranges with no trading days are omitted. The number of trading days in each premium/discount range is also shown as a percentage of the total number of trading days in the period covered by each table. All data presented here represents past performance, which cannot be used to predict future results.
iShares Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF
Period Covered: March 23, 2018 through June 30, 2018
| | | | | | | | |
Premium/Discount Range | | Number of Days | | | Percentage of Total Days | |
Greater than 0.0% and Less than 0.5% | | | 61 | | | | 88.40 | % |
At NAV | | | 5 | | | | 7.25 | |
Less than 0.0% and Greater than –0.5% | | | 3 | | | | 4.35 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 69 | | | | 100.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
iShares Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF
Period Covered: March 23, 2018 through June 30, 2018
| | | | | | | | |
Premium/Discount Range | | Number of Days | | | Percentage of Total Days | |
Greater than 0.0% and Less than 0.5% | | | 63 | | | | 91.30 | % |
At NAV | | | 4 | | | | 5.80 | |
Less than 0.0% and Greater than –0.5% | | | 2 | | | | 2.90 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 69 | | | | 100.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
iShares Evolved U.S. Financials ETF
Period Covered: March 23, 2018 through June 30, 2018
| | | | | | | | |
Premium/Discount Range | | Number of Days | | | Percentage of Total Days | |
Greater than 0.0% and Less than 0.5% | | | 63 | | | | 91.30 | % |
At NAV | | | 4 | | | | 5.80 | |
Less than 0.0% and Greater than –0.5% | | | 2 | | | | 2.90 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 69 | | | | 100.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
80 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Supplemental Information (unaudited) (continued)
iShares Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF
Period Covered: March 23, 2018 through June 30, 2018
| | | | | | | | |
Premium/Discount Range | | Number of Days | | | Percentage of Total Days | |
Greater than 0.0% and Less than 0.5% | | | 65 | | | | 94.20 | % |
At NAV | | | 1 | | | | 1.45 | |
Less than 0.0% and Greater than –0.5% | | | 3 | | | | 4.35 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 69 | | | | 100.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
iShares Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF
Period Covered: March 23, 2018 through June 30, 2018
| | | | | | | | |
Premium/Discount Range | | Number of Days | | | Percentage of Total Days | |
Greater than 0.0% and Less than 0.5% | | | 45 | | | | 65.22 | % |
At NAV | | | 14 | | | | 20.29 | |
Less than 0.0% and Greater than –0.5% | | | 10 | | | | 14.49 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 69 | | | | 100.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
iShares Evolved U.S. Media and Entertainment ETF
Period Covered: March 23, 2018 through June 30, 2018
| | | | | | | | |
Premium/Discount Range | | Number of Days | | | Percentage of Total Days | |
Greater than 0.0% and Less than 0.5% | | | 51 | | | | 73.92 | % |
At NAV | | | 8 | | | | 11.59 | |
Less than 0.0% and Greater than –0.5% | | | 10 | | | | 14.49 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 69 | | | | 100.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF
Period Covered: March 23, 2018 through June 30, 2018
| | | | | | | | |
Premium/Discount Range | | Number of Days | | | Percentage of Total Days | |
Greater than 0.0% and Less than 0.5% | | | 46 | | | | 66.66 | % |
At NAV | | | 4 | | | | 5.80 | |
Less than 0.0% and Greater than –0.5% | | | 19 | | | | 27.54 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 69 | | | | 100.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A T I O N | | 81 |
Trustee and Officer Information
The Board of Trustees has responsibility for the overall management and operations of the Funds, including general supervision of the duties performed by BFA and other service providers. Each Trustee serves until he or she resigns, is removed, dies, retires or becomes incapacitated. The President, Chief Compliance Officer, Treasurer and Secretary shall each hold office until their successors are chosen and qualify, and all other officers shall hold office until he or she resigns or is removed. Trustees who are not “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Trust are referred to as independent trustees (“Independent Trustees”).
The registered investment companies advised by BFA or its affiliates (the “BlackRock-advised Funds”) are organized into one complex of closed-end funds, two complexes of open-end funds and one complex of exchange-traded funds (“Exchange-Traded Fund Complex”) (each, a “BlackRock Fund Complex”). Each Fund is included in the BlackRock Fund Complex referred to as the Exchange-Traded Fund Complex. Each Trustee also serves as a Director of iShares, Inc. and a Trustee of iShares Trust, and, as a result, oversees all of the funds within the Exchange-Traded Fund Complex which consists of 358 funds as of July 31, 2018. With the exception of Robert S. Kapito, Mark K. Wiedman, Charles Park, Martin Small and Benjamin Archibald, the address of each Trustee and officer is c/o BlackRock, Inc., 400 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. The address of Mr. Kapito, Mr. Wiedman, Mr. Park, Mr. Small, and Mr. Archibald is c/o BlackRock, Inc., Park Avenue Plaza, 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. The Board has designated Cecilia H. Herbert as its Independent Board Chair. Additional information about the Funds’ Trustees and officers may be found in the Funds’ combined Statement of Additional Information, which is available without charge, upon request, by calling toll-free 1-800-iShares (1-800-474-2737).
Interested Trustees
| | | | | | |
Name (Age) | | Position(s) | | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years | | Other Directorships Held by Trustee |
| | | |
Robert S. Kapito(a) (61) | | Trustee (since 2011). | | President, BlackRock, Inc. (since 2006); Vice Chairman of BlackRock, Inc. and Head of BlackRock’s Portfolio Management Group (since its formation in 1998) and BlackRock, Inc.’s predecessor entities (since 1988); Trustee, University of Pennsylvania (since 2009); President of Board of Directors, Hope & Heroes Children’s Cancer Fund (since 2002). | | Director of BlackRock, Inc. (since 2006); Director of iShares Inc. (since 2009); Trustee of iShares Trust (since 2009). |
| | | |
Mark K. Wiedman(b) (47) | | Trustee (since 2013). | | Senior Managing Director, BlackRock, Inc. (since 2014); Managing Director, BlackRock, Inc. (2007-2014); Global Head of BlackRock’s ETF and Index Investments Business (since 2016); Global Head of iShares (2011-2016); Head of Corporate Strategy, BlackRock, Inc. (2009-2011). | | Director of iShares, Inc. (since 2013); Trustee of iShares Trust (since 2013); Director of PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (since 2008). |
(a) | Robert S. Kapito is deemed to be an “interested person” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Trust due to his affiliations with BlackRock, Inc. and its affiliates. |
(b) | Mark K. Wiedman is deemed to be an “interested person” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Trust due to his affiliations with BlackRock, Inc. and its affiliates. |
Independent Trustees
| | | | | | |
Name (Age) | | Position(s) | | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years | | Other Directorships Held by Trustee |
| | | |
Cecilia H. Herbert (69) | | Trustee (since 2011); Independent Board Chair (since 2016). | | Trustee and Member of the Finance, Technology and Quality Committee of Stanford Health Care (since 2016); Trustee and Member of the Investment Committee, WNET, a New York public media company (since 2011); Chair (1994-2005) and Member (since 1992) of the Investment Committee, Archdiocese of San Francisco; Director (1998-2013) and President (2007-2011) of the Board of Directors, Catholic Charities CYO; Trustee (2002-2011) and Chair of the Finance and Investment Committee (2006-2010) of the Thacher School. | | Director of iShares, Inc. (since 2005); Trustee of iShares Trust (since 2005); Independent Board Chair of iShares Inc. and iShares Trust (since 2016); Trustee of Forward Funds (14 portfolios) (since 2009); Trustee of Salient MF Trust (4 portfolios) (since 2015). |
| | | |
Jane D. Carlin (62) | | Trustee (since 2015); Risk Committee Chair (since 2016). | | Consultant (since 2012); Managing Director and Global Head of Financial Holding Company Governance & Assurance and the Global Head of Operational Risk Management of Morgan Stanley (2006-2012). | | Director of iShares, Inc. (since 2015); Trustee of iShares Trust (since 2015); Director of PHH Corporation (mortgage solutions) (since 2012); Director of The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (since (2016). |
| | | |
Richard L. Fagnani (63) | | Trustee (since 2017); Equity Plus Committee Chair (since 2017). | | Partner, KPMG LLP (2002-2016). | | Director of iShares, Inc. (since 2017); Trustee of iShares Trust (since 2017). |
| | |
82 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Trustee and Officer Information (continued)
Independent Trustees (continued)
| | | | | | |
Name (Age) | | Position(s) | | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years | | Other Directorships Held by Trustee |
| | | |
Charles A. Hurty (74) | | Trustee (since 2011); Audit Committee Chair (since 2011). | | Retired; Partner, KPMG LLP (1968-2001). | | Director of iShares, Inc. (since 2005); Trustee of iShares Trust (since 2005); Director of SkyBridge Alternative Investments Multi-Adviser Hedge Fund Portfolios LLC (2 portfolios) (since 2002). |
| | | |
John E. Kerrigan (63) | | Trustee (since 2011); Securities Lending Committee Chair (since 2016). | | Chief Investment Officer, Santa Clara University (since 2002). | | Director of iShares, Inc. (since 2005); Trustee of iShares Trust (since 2005). |
| | | |
Drew E. Lawton (59) | | Trustee (since 2017); 15(c) Committee Chair (since 2017). | | Senior Managing Director of New York Life Insurance Company (2010- 2015). | | Director of iShares, Inc. (since 2017); Trustee of iShares Trust (since 2017). |
| | | |
John E. Martinez (57) | | Trustee (since 2011); Fixed Income Plus Committee Chair (since 2016). | | Director of Real Estate Equity Exchange, Inc. (since 2005). | | Director of iShares, Inc. (since 2003); Trustee of iShares Trust (since 2003). |
| | | |
Madhav V. Rajan (53) | | Trustee (since 2011); Nominating and Governance Committee Chair (since 2017). | | Dean, and George Pratt Shultz Professor of Accounting, University of Chicago Booth School of Business (since 2017); Robert K. Jaedicke Professor of Accounting, Stanford University Graduate School of Business (2001-2017); Professor of Law (by courtesy), Stanford Law School (2005-2017); Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Head of MBA Program, Stanford University Graduate School of Business (2010-2016). | | Director of iShares, Inc. (since 2011); Trustee of iShares Trust (since 2011). |
Officers
| | | | |
Name (Age) | | Position(s) | | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years |
| | |
Martin Small (43) | | President (since 2016). | | Managing Director, BlackRock, Inc. (since 2010); Head of U.S. iShares (since 2015); Co-Head of the U.S. Financial Markets Advisory Group, BlackRock, Inc. (2008-2014). |
| | |
Jack Gee (58) | | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (since 2011). | | Managing Director, BlackRock, Inc. (since 2009); Senior Director of Fund Administration of Intermediary Investor Business, BGI (2009). |
| | |
Charles Park (50) | | Chief Compliance Officer (since 2011). | | Chief Compliance Officer of BlackRock Advisors, LLC and the BlackRock-advised Funds in the Equity-Bond Complex, the Equity-Liquidity Complex and the Closed-End Complex (since 2014); Chief Compliance Officer of BFA (since 2006). |
| | |
Benjamin Archibald (43) | | Secretary (since 2015). | | Managing Director, BlackRock, Inc. (since 2014); Director, BlackRock, Inc. (2010-2013); Secretary of the BlackRock-advised Mutual Funds (since 2012). |
| | |
Steve Messinger (56) | | Executive Vice President (since 2016). | | Managing Director, BlackRock, Inc. (2007-2014 and since 2016); Managing Director, Beacon Consulting Group (2014-2016). |
| | |
Scott Radell (49) | | Executive Vice President (since 2012). | | Managing Director, BlackRock, Inc. (since 2009); Head of Portfolio Solutions, BlackRock, Inc. (since 2009). |
| | |
Alan Mason (57) | | Executive Vice President (since 2016). | | Managing Director, BlackRock, Inc. (since 2009). |
| | |
T R U S T E E A N D O F F I C E R I N F O R M A T I O N | | 83 |
General Information
Electronic Delivery
Shareholders can sign up for email notifications announcing that the shareholder report or prospectus has been posted on the iShares website at www.iShares.com. Once you have enrolled, you will no longer receive prospectuses and shareholder reports in the mail.
To enroll in electronic delivery
| • | | Go to www.icsdelivery.com. |
| • | | If your brokerage firm is not listed, electronic delivery may not be available. Please contact your broker-dealer or financial advisor. |
Householding
Householding is an option available to certain fund investors. Householding is a method of delivery, based on the preference of the individual investor, in which a single copy of certain shareholder documents can be delivered to investors who share the same address, even if their accounts are registered under different names. Please contact your broker-dealer if you are interested in enrolling in householding and receiving a single copy of prospectuses and other shareholder documents, or if you are currently enrolled in householding and wish to change your householding status.
Availability of Quarterly Schedule of Investments
The iShares Funds file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The iShares Funds’ Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C.Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The iShares Funds also disclose their complete schedule of portfolio holdings on a daily basis on the iShares website at www.iShares.com.
Availability of Proxy Voting Policies and Proxy Voting Records
A description of the policies and procedures that iShares Funds use to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities and information about how the iShares Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ending June 30 is available without charge, upon request (1) by calling toll-free 1-800-474-2737; (2) on the iShares website at www.iShares.com; and (3) on the SEC website at www.sec.gov.
| | |
84 | | 2 0 1 8 I S H A R E S A N N U A L R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S |
Glossary of Terms Used in this Report
Portfolio Abbreviations - Equity
NVS Non-Voting Shares
| | |
G L O S S A R Y O F T E R M S | | 85 |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
For more information visit www.iShares.com or call 1-800-iShares (1-800-474-2737)
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cd59/2cd594c71d2a50d99e9eb7fef0409f60acca03fd" alt="LOGO" | | This report is intended for the Funds’ shareholders. It may not be distributed to prospective investors unless it is preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus. |
| Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. |
| The iShares Funds are distributed by BlackRock Investments, LLC (together with its affiliates, “BlackRock”). |
| ©2018 BlackRock, Inc. All rights reserved. iSHARES and BLACKROCK are registered trademarks of BlackRock, Inc. or its subsidiaries. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. |
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics, as of the end of the period covered by this report, applicable to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. During the period covered by this report, the code of ethics was amended to clarify an inconsistency in to whom persons covered by the code should report suspected violations of the code. The amendment clarifies that such reporting should be made to BlackRock’s General Counsel, and retains the alternative option of anonymous reporting following “whistleblower” policies. Other non-material changes were also made in connection with this amendment. During the period covered by this report, there have been no waivers granted under the code of ethics. The registrant undertakes to provide a copy of the code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling 1-800-474-2737.
Item 3. | Audit Committee Financial Expert. |
The registrant’s Board of Trustees has determined that the registrant has more than one audit committee financial expert, as that term is defined under Item 3(b) and 3(c), serving on its audit committee. The audit committee financial experts serving on the registrant’s audit committee are Charles A. Hurty, Richard L. Fagnani (began serving on the audit committee effective as of June 20, 2017 and was designated as an audit committee financial expert serving on the audit
committee effective as of September 15, 2017), John E. Kerrigan, and Madhav V. Rajan, all of whom are independent, as that term is defined under Item 3(a)(2).
Item 4. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services. |
The principal accountant fees disclosed in items 4(a), 4(b), 4(c), 4(d) and 4(g) are for the seven series of the registrant for which the fiscal year-end is July 31, 2018 (the “Funds”), and whose annual financial statements are reported in Item 1.
| (a) | Audit Fees – The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the Funds’ annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years were N/A for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2017 and $79,800 for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018. |
| (b) | Audit-Related Fees – There were no fees billed for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2017 and July 31, 2018 for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Fund’s financial statements and are not reported under (a) of this Item. |
| (c) | Tax Fees – The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning for the Funds were N/A for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2017 and $26,467 for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018. These services related to the review of the Funds’ tax returns and excise tax calculations. |
| (d) | All Other Fees – There were no other fees billed in each of the fiscal years ended July 31, 2017 and July 31, 2018 for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in (a) through (c) of this Item. |
| (e) | (1) The registrant’s audit committee charter, as amended, provides that the audit committee is responsible for the approval, prior to appointment, of the engagement of the principal accountant to annually audit and provide their opinion on the registrant’s financial statements. The audit committee must also approve, prior to appointment, the engagement of the principal accountant to provide non-audit services to the registrant or to any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the registrant’s investment adviser (“Adviser Affiliate”) that provides ongoing services to the registrant, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant. |
(2) There were no services described in (b) through (d) above that were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
| (f) | None of the hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the Funds’ financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018 were attributable to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees. |
| (g) | The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the registrant’s principal accountant for services rendered to the Funds, and rendered to the registrant’s investment adviser, and any Adviser Affiliate that provides ongoing services to the registrant for the last two fiscal years were N/A for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2017 and $26,467 for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018. |
| (h) | The registrant’s audit committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services rendered to the registrant’s investment adviser and any Adviser Affiliate that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, if any, is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence, and has determined that the provision of these services, if any, does not compromise the principal accountant’s independence. |
Item 5. | Audit Committee of Listed Registrants |
(a) The registrant is a listed issuer as defined in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act of 1934 and has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act of 1934.
The registrant’s audit committee members are Charles A. Hurty, Richard L. Fagnani (began serving on the audit committee effective as of June 20, 2017), John E. Kerrigan, and Madhav V. Rajan.
Item 7. | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not applicable to the registrant.
Item 8. | Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not applicable to the registrant.
Item 9. | Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers. |
Not applicable to the registrant.
Item 10. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s Board of Trustees.
Item 11. | Controls and Procedures. |
(a) The President (the registrant’s Principal Executive Officer) and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (the registrant’s Principal Financial Officer) have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) are effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act of 1934.
(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. | Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not applicable to the registrant.
(a) (1) Code of Ethics is not filed as an exhibit; please refer to Item 2.
(a) (2) Section 302 Certifications are attached.
(a) (3) Not applicable.
(a) (4) Not applicable.
(b) Section 906 Certifications are attached.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
iShares U.S. ETF Trust
| | |
By: /s/ Martin Small |
Martin Small, President (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
Date: September 28, 2018 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | |
By: /s/ Martin Small Martin Small, President (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
Date: September 28, 2018 |
| | |
By: /s/ Jack Gee Jack Gee, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
Date: September 28, 2018 |