UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 | |
FORM 10-Q | |
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ________________ to ________________ | |
Commission File Number: 1-768 | |
CATERPILLAR INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) | |
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | 37-0602744 (IRS Employer I.D. No.) |
100 NE Adams Street, Peoria, Illinois (Address of principal executive offices) | 61629 (Zip Code) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (309) 675-1000 | |
At September 30, 2004, 341,235,956 shares of common stock of the Registrant were outstanding. |
Page 1
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Caterpillar Inc. Consolidated Statement of Results of Operations (Unaudited) (Dollars in millions except per share data) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Sales and revenues: | ||||||||
Sales of Machinery and Engines | $ | 7,175 | $ | 5,112 | ||||
Revenues of Financial Products | 474 | 433 | ||||||
Total sales and revenues | 7,649 | 5,545 | ||||||
Operating costs: | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 5,728 | 4,143 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 734 | 627 | ||||||
Research and development expenses | 240 | 173 | ||||||
Interest expense of Financial Products | 129 | 116 | ||||||
Other operating expenses | 140 | 101 | ||||||
Total operating costs | 6,971 | 5,160 | ||||||
Operating profit | 678 | 385 | ||||||
Interest expense excluding Financial Products | 60 | 61 | ||||||
Other income (expense) | 45 | (40 | ) | |||||
Consolidated profit before taxes | 663 | 284 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | 182 | 69 | ||||||
Profit of consolidated companies | 481 | 215 | ||||||
Equity in profit (loss) of unconsolidated affiliated companies | 17 | 7 | ||||||
Profit | $ | 498 | $ | 222 | ||||
Profit per common share | $ | 1.45 | $ | 0.64 | ||||
Profit per common share - diluted1 | $ | 1.41 | $ | 0.62 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (millions) | ||||||||
- Basic | 341.8 | 346.3 | ||||||
- Diluted1 | 353.0 | 356.1 | ||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
1 Diluted by assumed exercise of stock options, using the treasury stock method. | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | ||||||||
Page 2
Caterpillar Inc. Consolidated Statement of Results of Operations (Unaudited) (Dollars in millions except per share data) | |||||||||
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||
September 30, | |||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
Sales and revenues: | |||||||||
Sales of Machinery and Engines | $ | 20,277 | $ | 15,037 | |||||
Revenues of Financial Products | 1,403 | 1,261 | |||||||
Total sales and revenues | 21,680 | 16,298 | |||||||
Operating costs: | |||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 15,952 | 12,102 | |||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 2,223 | 1,801 | |||||||
Research and development expenses | 685 | 494 | |||||||
Interest expense of Financial Products | 367 | 354 | |||||||
Other operating expenses | 416 | 358 | |||||||
Total operating costs | 19,643 | 15,109 | |||||||
Operating profit | 2,037 | 1,189 | |||||||
Interest expense excluding Financial Products | 176 | 192 | |||||||
Other income (expense) | 135 | 15 | |||||||
Consolidated profit before taxes | 1,996 | 1,012 | |||||||
Provision for income taxes | 549 | 273 | |||||||
Profit of consolidated companies | 1,447 | 739 | |||||||
Equity in profit (loss) of unconsolidated affiliated companies | 37 | 11 | |||||||
Profit | $ | 1,484 | $ | 750 | |||||
Profit per common share | $ | 4.34 | $ | 2.17 | |||||
Profit per common share - diluted1 | $ | 4.19 | $ | 2.15 | |||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (millions) | |||||||||
- Basic | 342.3 | 345.1 | |||||||
- Diluted1 | 354.2 | 349.0 | |||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | .78 | $ | .70 | |||||
1 Diluted by assumed exercise of stock options, using the treasury stock method. | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | |||||||||
Page 3
Caterpillar Inc. Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity For the Nine Months Ended (Unaudited) (Millions of dollars) | |||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2004 | September 30, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Common stock: | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 1, 059 | $ | 1,034 | |||||||||||||
Common shares issued from treasury stock | 73 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period | 1,132 | 1,036 | |||||||||||||||
Treasury stock: | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | (2,914 | ) | (2,669 | ) | |||||||||||||
Shares issued: 2004 - 2,770,916; 2003 - 2,985,265 | 76 | 98 | |||||||||||||||
Shares repurchased: 2004 - 5,297,000 | (400 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period | (3,238 | ) | (2,571 | ) | |||||||||||||
Profit employed in the business: | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | 8,450 | 7,849 | |||||||||||||||
Profit | 1,484 | $ | 1,484 | 750 | $ | 750 | |||||||||||
Dividends declared | (267 | ) | (242 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance at end of period | 9,667 | 8,357 | |||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment: | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | 348 | 86 | |||||||||||||||
Aggregate adjustment for period | 5 | 5 | 149 | 149 | |||||||||||||
Balance at end of period | 353 | 235 | |||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment - consolidated companies: | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period (net of tax of: 2004-$460; 2003-$383) | (934 | ) | (771 | ) | |||||||||||||
Aggregate adjustment for period | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||
Balance at end of period (net of tax of: 2004-$460; 2003-$383) | (934 | ) | (771 | ) | |||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment - unconsolidated companies: | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | (48 | ) | (37 | ) | |||||||||||||
Aggregate adjustment for period | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||
Balance at end of period | (49 | ) | (38 | ) | |||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments: | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period (net of tax of: 2004-$54; 2003-$5) | 104 | 11 | |||||||||||||||
Gains/(losses) deferred during period (net of tax of: 2004-$4; 2003-$5) | 8 | 8 | (11 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||||||
(Gains)/losses reclassified to earnings during period (net of tax of: 2004-$17; 2003-$19) | (33 | ) | (33 | ) | 39 | 39 | |||||||||||
Balance at end of period (net of tax of: 2004-$41; 2003-$19) | 79 | 39 | |||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period (net of tax of: 2004-$7; 2003-$17) | 13 | (31 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Gains/(losses) deferred during period (net of tax of: 2004-$1; 2003-$6) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 31 | 31 | |||||||||||
(Gains)/losses reclassified to earnings during period (net of tax of 2004-$0; 2003-$9) | - | - | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||
Balance at end of period (net of tax of: 2004-$6; 2003-$2) | 11 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive income | (540 | ) | (530 | ) | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 1,461 | $ | 962 | |||||||||||||
Stockholders' equity at end of period | $ | 7,021 | $ | 6,292 | |||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | |||||||||||||||||
Page 4
Caterpillar Inc. Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (Unaudited) (Millions of dollars) | |||||||||||
September 30, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||
Current assets: | |||||||||||
Cash and short-term investments | $ | 417 | $ | 342 | |||||||
Receivables - trade and other | 3,790 | 3,666 | |||||||||
Receivables - finance | 8,951 | 7,605 | |||||||||
Deferred and refundable income taxes | 619 | 707 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses | 1,350 | 1,424 | |||||||||
Inventories | 4,509 | 3,047 | |||||||||
Total current assets | 19,636 | 16,791 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment - net | 7,303 | 7,290 | |||||||||
Long-term receivables - trade and other | 268 | 82 | |||||||||
Long-term receivables - finance | 8,326 | 7,822 | |||||||||
Investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies | 839 | 800 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 516 | 616 | |||||||||
Intangible assets | 361 | 239 | |||||||||
Goodwill | 1,450 | 1,398 | |||||||||
Other assets | 1,695 | 1,427 | |||||||||
Total assets | $ | 40,394 | $ | 36,465 | |||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||||||
Short-term borrowings: | |||||||||||
Machinery and Engines | 336 | 72 | |||||||||
Financial Products | 2,582 | 2,685 | |||||||||
Accounts payable | 3,934 | 3,100 | |||||||||
Accrued expenses | 1,793 | 1,638 | |||||||||
Accrued wages, salaries and employee benefits | 1,345 | 1,802 | |||||||||
Dividends payable | - | 127 | |||||||||
Deferred and current income taxes payable | 235 | 216 | |||||||||
Long-term debt due within one year: | |||||||||||
Machinery and Engines | 6 | 32 | |||||||||
Financial Products | 3,595 | 2,949 | |||||||||
Total current liabilities | 13,826 | 12,621 | |||||||||
Long-term debt due after one year: | |||||||||||
Machinery and Engines | 3,642 | 3,367 | |||||||||
Financial Products | 12,112 | 10,711 | |||||||||
Liability for postemployment benefits | 3,234 | 3,172 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes and other liabilities | 559 | 516 | |||||||||
Total liabilities | 33,373 | 30,387 | |||||||||
Stockholders' equity | |||||||||||
Common stock of $1.00 par: | |||||||||||
Authorized shares: 900,000,000 Issued shares: (09/30/04 and 12/31/03 - 407,447,312) at paid in amount | 1,132 | 1,059 | |||||||||
Treasury stock (09/30/04 - 66,211,356; 12/31/03 - 63,685,272) at cost | (3,238 | ) | (2,914 | ) | |||||||
Profit employed in the business | 9,667 | 8,450 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | (540 | ) | (517 | ) | |||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 7,021 | 6,078 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 40,394 | $ | 36,465 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | |||||||||||
Page 5
Caterpillar Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow (Unaudited) (Millions of dollars) | |||||||||
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||
September 30, | |||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
Cash flow from operating activities: | |||||||||
Profit | $ | 1,484 | $ | 750 | |||||
Adjustments for non-cash items: | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,055 | 1,008 | |||||||
Other | (120 | ) | 46 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||||||
Receivables - trade and other | (461 | ) | (220 | ) | |||||
Inventories | (1,225 | ) | (294 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 815 | 108 | |||||||
Other - net | (13 | ) | 9 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,535 | 1,407 | |||||||
Cash flow from investing activities: | |||||||||
Capital expenditures - excluding equipment leased to others | (519 | ) | (352 | ) | |||||
Expenditures for equipment leased to others | (827 | ) | (781 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from disposals of property,plant and equipment | 531 | 451 | |||||||
Additions to finance receivables | (16,493 | ) | (12,245 | ) | |||||
Collections of finance receivables | 13,010 | 10,044 | |||||||
Proceeds from the sale of finance receivables | 1,434 | 1,472 | |||||||
Investments and acquisitions (net of cash acquired) | (284 | ) | (26 | ) | |||||
Other - net | (193 | ) | (55 | ) | |||||
Net cash used for investing activities | (3,341 | ) | (1,492 | ) | |||||
Cash flow from financing activities: | |||||||||
Dividends paid | (395 | ) | (361 | ) | |||||
Common stock issued, including treasury shares reissued | 137 | 81 | |||||||
Treasury shares purchased | (400 | ) | - | ||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt issued | 4,532 | 4,233 | |||||||
Payments on long-term debt | (2,615 | ) | (2,992 | ) | |||||
Short-term borrowings - net | 563 | (788 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 1,822 | 173 | |||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | 59 | - | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and short-term investments | 75 | 88 | |||||||
Cash and short-term investments at beginning of period | 342 | 309 | |||||||
Cash and short-term investments at end of period | $ | 417 | $ | 397 | |||||
All short-term investments, which consist primarily of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, are considered to be cash equivalents. | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | |||||||||
Page 6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. A. Financial Statement Presentation
In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of (a) the consolidated results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, (b) the changes in stockholders' equity for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, (c) the consolidated financial position at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, and (d) the consolidated statement of cash flow for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, have been made. Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation.
The December 31, 2003 balance sheet data included herein is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
B. Nature of Operations
We operate in three principal lines of business:
(1) | Machinery - A principal line of business which includes the design, manufacture and marketing of construction, mining, and forestry machinery - track and wheel tractors, track and wheel loaders, pipelayers, motor graders, wheel tractor-scrapers, track and wheel excavators, backhoe loaders, mining shovels, log skidders, log loaders, off-highway trucks, articulated trucks, paving products, telescopic handlers, skid steer loaders and related parts. Also includes logistics services for other companies. |
(2) | Engines - A principal line of business including the design, manufacture and marketing of engines for Caterpillar machinery, electric power generation systems; on-highway vehicles and locomotives; marine, petroleum, construction, industrial, agricultural and other applications; and related parts. Reciprocating engines meet power needs ranging from 5 to over 22,000 horsepower (4 to over 16 200 kilowatts). Turbines range from 1,600 to 19,500 horsepower (1 000 to 14 500 kilowatts). |
(3) | Financial Products - A principal line of business consisting primarily of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (Cat Financial), Caterpillar Insurance Holdings, Inc. (Cat Insurance), Caterpillar Power Ventures Corporation (Cat Power Ventures) and their subsidiaries. Cat Financial provides a wide range of financing alternatives for Caterpillar machinery and engines, Solar gas turbines, as well as other equipment and marine vessels. Cat Financial also extends loans to customers and dealers. Cat Insurance provides various forms of insurance to customers and dealers to help support the purchase and lease of our equipment. Cat Power Ventures is an active investor in independent power projects using Caterpillar power generation equipment an d services. |
Our Machinery and Engines operations are highly integrated. Throughout the Notes, Machinery and Engines represents the aggregate total of these principal lines of business.
C. Stock-Based Compensation
We use the intrinsic value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." Therefore, no compensation expense is recognized in association with our options.
Employee stock options granted in years prior to 2004 vest at the rate of one-third per year over the three year period following the date of grant. On June 8, 2004, approximately 8,900,000 stock options were granted to officers and other key employees. In anticipation of delaying vesting until three years after the grant date for future grants, the 2004 grant will vest on December 31, 2004.
The fair value of the options granted in 2004 was estimated using the binomial option-pricing model. We believe this model more accurately reflects the value of the options than using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Previous years grants continue to be valued using the Black-Scholes model.
Page 7
Pro forma net profit and profit per share using the binomial option-pricing model for the 2004 grant and the Black-Scholes option- pricing model for 2003 and previous grants were:
Three Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||
(Dollars in millions except per share data) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Profit, as reported | $ | 498 | $ | 222 | |||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects | (58 | ) | (19 | ) | |||||
Pro forma profit | $ | 440 | $ | 203 | |||||
Profit per share of common stock: | |||||||||
As reported: | |||||||||
Basic | $ | 1.45 | $ | 0.64 | |||||
Diluted | $ | 1.41 | $ | 0.62 | |||||
Pro forma: | |||||||||
Basic | $ | 1.29 | $ | 0.59 | |||||
Diluted | $ | 1.25 | $ | 0.57 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||
(Dollars in millions except per share data) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Profit, as reported | $ | 1,484 | $ | 750 | |||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects | (103 | ) | (50 | ) | |||||
Pro forma profit | $ | 1,381 | $ | 700 | |||||
Profit per share of common stock: | |||||||||
As reported: | |||||||||
Basic | $ | 4.34 | $ | 2.17 | |||||
Diluted | $ | 4.19 | $ | 2.15 | |||||
Pro forma: | |||||||||
Basic | $ | 4.03 | $ | 2.03 | |||||
Diluted | $ | 3.90 | $ | 2.00 | |||||
Pro forma net profit and profit per share for the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2004 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model would have been:
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
(Dollars in millions except per share data) | 2004 | 2004 | |||||||
Profit, as reported | $ | 498 | $ | 1,484 | |||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects | (76 | ) | (127 | ) | |||||
Pro forma profit | $ | 422 | $ | 1,357 | |||||
Profit per share of common stock: | |||||||||
Pro forma: | |||||||||
Basic | $ | 1.23 | $ | 3.97 | |||||
Diluted | $ | 1.20 | $ | 3.83 | |||||
Page 8
2.The results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year 2004.
3. Environmental and Legal Matters
The company is regulated by federal, state, and international environmental laws governing our use of substances and control of emissions in all our operations. Compliance with these existing laws has not had a material impact on our capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position.
We are cleaning up hazardous waste at a number of locations, often with other companies, pursuant to federal and state laws. When it is likely we will pay clean-up costs at a site and those costs can be estimated, the costs are charged against our earnings. In doing that estimate, we do not consider amounts expected to be recovered from insurance companies and others.
The amount accrued for environmental clean-up is not material and is included in "Accrued expenses" in the Statement of Financial Position. If a range of liability estimates is available on a particular site, we accrue at the lower end of that range.
We cannot estimate costs on sites in the very early stages of clean-up. Currently, we have five sites in the very early stages of clean-up, and there is no more than a remote chance that a material amount for clean-up will be required.
Pursuant to a consent decree Caterpillar entered with the EPA, the company was required to meet certain emission standards by October 2002. The decree provides that if engine manufacturers were unable to meet the standards at that time, they would be required to pay a Non-Conformance Penalty (NCP) on each engine sold that did not meet the standard. The amount of the NCP would be based on how close to meeting the standard the engine came - the more out of compliance the higher the penalty. The company began introduction of fully compliant ACERT engines in 2003 and by the end of 2003 Caterpillar was only producing fully compliant engine models. As a result, NCPs are not payable for any engines built in 2004. The company’s operating profit was favorably impacted in the third quarter 2004 and year to date 2004 by $36 million an d $132 million, respectively, due to the absence of NCPs that were recorded in those periods in 2003.
In addition, the consent decree required Caterpillar to pay a fine of $25 million, which was expensed in 1998 and to make investments totaling $35 million in environmental-related products by July 7, 2007. Total qualifying investments to date for these projects are $33 million, of which $2 million was made in the first nine months of 2004. A future benefit is expected to be realized from these environmental projects related to Caterpillar's ability to capitalize on the technologies it developed in complying with its environmental project obligations. In short, Caterpillar expects to receive a positive net return on the environmental projects by being able to market the technology it developed.
We are a party to litigation matters and claims that are normal in the course of our operations, and, while the results of such litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes, based on the advice of counsel, the final outcome of such matters will not have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated financial position.
On January 16, 2002, Caterpillar commenced an action in the Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Illinois in Peoria, Illinois, against Navistar International Transportation Corporation and International Truck and Engine Corporation (collectively Navistar). The lawsuit arises out of a long-term purchase contract between Caterpillar and Navistar effective May 31, 1988, as amended from time to time (the Purchase Agreement). The pending complaint alleges that Navistar breached its contractual obligations by: (i) paying Caterpillar $8.08 less per fuel injector than the agreed upon price for new unit injectors delivered by Caterpillar; (ii) refusing to pay contractually agreed upon surcharges owed as a result of Navistar ordering less than planned volumes of replacement unit injectors; and (iii) refusing to pay contractually agreed upon interest stemming from Navistar’s late payments. At September 30, 2004, the past due receivable from Navistar regarding the foregoing was $139 million. The pending complaint also has claims alleging that Franklin Power Products, Inc., Newstream Enterprises, and Navistar, collectively and individually, failed to pay the applicable price for shipments of unit injectors to Franklin and Newstream. At September 30, 2004, the past due receivables for the foregoing totaled $12 million. The pending complaint further alleges that Sturman Industries, Inc., and Sturman Engine Systems, Inc., colluded with Navistar to utilize technology that Sturman Industries, Inc., misappropriated from Caterpillar to help Navistar develop its G2 fuel system, and tortiously interfered with the Purchase Agreement and Caterpillar’s prospective economic relationship with Navistar. The pending complaint further alleges that the two parties’ collusion led Navistar to select Sturman Engine Systems , Inc. and another company, instead of Caterpillar, to develop and manufacture the G2 fuel system.
Page 9
On May 7, 2002, International Truck and Engine Corporation (International) commenced an action against Caterpillar in the Circuit Court of DuPage County, Illinois that alleges Caterpillar breached various aspects of a long-term agreement term sheet. In its fourth amended complaint, International seeks a declaration from the court that the term sheet constitutes a legally binding contract for the sale of heavy-duty engines at specified prices through the end of 2006, alleges that Caterpillar breached the term sheet by raising certain prices effective October 1, 2002, and also alleges that Caterpillar breached an obligation to negotiate a comprehensive long-term agreement referenced in the term sheet. International further claims that Caterpillar improperly restricted the supply of heavy-duty engines to Internati onal from June through September 2002, and claims that Caterpillar made certain fraudulent misrepresentations with respect to the availability of engines during this time period. International seeks damages "in an amount to be determined at trial" and injunctive relief. Caterpillar filed an answer denying International's claims and has filed a counterclaim seeking a declaration that the term sheet has been effectively terminated. Caterpillar denies International's claims and will vigorously contest them. On September 24, 2003, the Appellate Court of Illinois, ruling on an interlocutory appeal, issued an order consistent with Caterpillar's position that, even if the court subsequently determines that the term sheet is a binding contract, it is indefinite in duration and was therefore terminable at will by Caterpillar after a reasonable period. Caterpillar anticipates that a trial currently scheduled to begin in the first quarter of 2005 will address all remaining issues in this matter. This matter is not related to the breach of contract action brought by Caterpillar against Navistar currently pending in the Circuit Court of Peoria County, Illinois.
The EU is imposing retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. origin goods as a result of a WTO decision that found the extraterritorial income exclusion (ETI) provisions of the FSC Repeal and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act of 2000 constituted a prohibited export subsidy. These tariffs, which began in March of 2004 at 5 percent, have increased 1 percentage point per month and would increase to 17 percent after one year. Given the makeup of the final retaliation list, some Caterpillar parts and components are subject to these tariffs. We do not believe these tariffs will materially impact our fi nancial results. The company has production facilities in the EU, Russia, Asia, and South America. Products sold into the EU from these plants are not affected by this retaliatory tariff. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (Act), enacted on October 22, 2004, phases-out the ETI provisions. As a result, the EU announced that it plans to end the retaliatory sanctions pending the outcome of a WTO review to determine whether certain provisions of the Act are compliant with the ruling against the FSC/ETI regime. The sanctions are not expected to be lifted officially until January 1, 2005.
4. Inventories
Inventories (principally "last-in, first-out" method) comprise the following:
(Millions of dollars) | September 30, | December 31, | |||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||
Raw materials | $ | 1,493 | $ | 1,105 | |||
Work-in-process | 691 | 377 | |||||
Finished goods | 2,131 | 1,381 | |||||
Supplies | 194 | 184 | |||||
Total inventories | $ | 4,509 | $ | 3,047 | |||
5. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
A. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are comprised of the following:
(Millions of dollars) | September 30, | December 31, | |||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||
Intellectual property | $ | 203 | $ | 126 | |||
Pension-related | 157 | 157 | |||||
Other | 73 | - | |||||
Total intangible assets - gross | 433 | 283 | |||||
Less: Accumulated amortization of finite lived intangible assets | (72 | ) | (44 | ) | |||
Intangible assets - net | $ | 361 | $ | 239 | |||
Page 10
During the third quarter of 2004 we acquired finite lived intangible assets of $130 million. (See Note 13 for details on the acquisition of these assets.) Amortization expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $5 million and $16 million, respectively. Amortization expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 was $6 million and $10 million, respectively. Amortization expense related to intangible assets is expected to be:
(Millions of dollars) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 21 | $ | 20 | $ | 19 | $ | 16 | $ | 14 | $ | 128 | |||||||||||
B. Goodwill
During the third quarter of 2004 we acquired assets with related goodwill of $55 million. (See Note 13 for details on the acquisition of these assets.) No goodwill was impaired or disposed of during the three or nine month periods ended September 30, 2004. No goodwill was acquired or impaired during the three or nine month periods ended September 30, 2003. During the third quarter of 2003 we disposed of assets with related goodwill of $3 million.
6. Unconsolidated Affiliated Companies
Our investment in affiliated companies accounted for by the equity method consists primarily of a 50 percent interest in Shin Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd. (SCM) in Japan. Combined financial information of the unconsolidated affiliated companies accounted for using the equity method (generally on a three month lag, e.g., SCM results reflect the periods ending June 30) was as follows:
Results of Operations | Results of Operations | ||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Sales | $ | 986 | $ | 805 | $ | 2,699 | $ | 2,261 | |||||||
Cost of sales | 743 | 624 | 2,070 | 1,765 | |||||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 243 | $ | 181 | $ | 629 | $ | 496 | |||||||
Profit (loss) | $ | 35 | $ | 17 | $ | 81 | $ | 27 | |||||||
Caterpillar's profit (loss) | $ | 17 | $ | 7 | $ | 37 | $ | 11 | |||||||
Financial Position | ||||||||
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(Millions of dollars) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||
Assets: | ||||||||
Current assets | $ | 1,623 | $ | 1,494 | ||||
Property, plant and equipment - net | 1,036 | 961 | ||||||
Other assets | 187 | 202 | ||||||
2,846 | 2,657 | |||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||
Current liabilities | 1,402 | 1,247 | ||||||
Long-term debt due after one year | 286 | 343 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 222 | 257 | ||||||
1,910 | 1,847 | |||||||
Ownership | $ | 936 | $ | 810 | ||||
Caterpillar's investment in unconsolidated affiliated companies | ||||||||
Investment in equity method companies | $ | 470 | $ | 432 | ||||
Plus: Investment in cost method companies | 369 | 368 | ||||||
Total investment in unconsolidated affiliated companies | $ | 839 | $ | 800 | ||||
Page 11
7.Segment Information
Caterpillar is organized based on a decentralized structure that has established accountabilities to continually improve business focus and increase our ability to react quickly to changes in both the global business cycle and competitors' actions. Our current structure uses a product, geographic matrix organization comprised of multiple profit center and service center divisions.
We have developed an internal measurement system, which is not based on generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), that is intended to motivate desired behavior and drive performance rather than measure a division's contribution to enterprise results. It is the comparison of actual results to budgeted results that makes our internal reporting valuable to management. Consequently, we believe that segment disclosure based on Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 (SFAS 131) "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" has limited value to our external readers. As a result, in addition to the required SFAS 131 compliant segment information presented below, we are continuing to disclose GAAP-based financial results for our three lines of business (Machinery, Engines, and Financial Products ) in our Management's Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 24.
We made several changes to our segment reporting methodologies in the first quarter of 2004. Most notable are a change in the current cost methodology used to value inventory and cost of sales and a change in the manner that interest expense is charged to profit centers. In addition, certain corporate costs that were charged to segments in prior years are now reported as reconciling items. Prior year amounts have been restated to conform to the new methodology.
Business Segments Three Months Ended September 30, (Millions of dollars) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Machinery and Engines | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | Asia/Pacific Marketing | Construction & Mining Products | EAME Marketing | Latin America Marketing | Power Products | North America Marketing | All Other | Total | Financing & Insurance Services | Consolidated Total | |||||||||||||||||
External sales and revenues | $ | 486 | $ | 143 | $ | 956 | $ | 499 | $ | 2,344 | $ | 2,289 | $ | 399 | $ | 7,116 | $ | 568 | $ | 7,684 | |||||||
Intersegment sales& revenues | 191 | 3,062 | 823 | 210 | 2,265 | 105 | 676 | 7,332 | - | 7,332 | |||||||||||||||||
Total sales and revenues | $ | 677 | $ | 3,205 | $ | 1,779 | $ | 709 | $ | 4,609 | $ | 2,394 | $ | 1,075 | $ | 14,448 | $ | 568 | $ | 15,016 | |||||||
Accountable profit (loss) | $ | 20 | $ | 252 | $ | 62 | $ | 45 | $ | 111 | $ | 113 | $ | 185 | $ | 788 | $ | 125 | $ | 913 | |||||||
Accountable assets at September 30, 2004 | $ | 587 | $ | 2,584 | $ | 1,203 | $ | 720 | $ | 3,855 | $ | 32 | $ | 3,331 | $ | 12,312 | $ | 22,639 | $ | 34,951 | |||||||
2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External sales and revenues | $ | 344 | $ | 68 | $ | 747 | $ | 290 | $ | 1,711 | $ | 1,612 | $ | 281 | $ | 5,053 | $ | 512 | $ | 5,565 | |||||||
Intersegment sales & revenues | 105 | 2,163 | 559 | 142 | 1,668 | 60 | 659 | 5,356 | 1 | 5,357 | |||||||||||||||||
Total sales and revenues | $ | 449 | $ | 2,231 | $ | 1,306 | $ | 432 | $ | 3,379 | $ | 1,672 | $ | 940 | $ | 10,409 | $ | 513 | $ | 10,922 | |||||||
Accountable profit (loss) | $ | 21 | $ | 62 | $ | 25 | $ | 22 | $ | 19 | $ | 82 | $ | 94 | $ | 325 | $ | 98 | $ | 423 | |||||||
Accountable assets at December 31, 2003 | $ | 627 | $ | 2,190 | $ | 1,018 | $ | 692 | $ | 3,710 | $ | 293 | $ | 2,537 | $ | 11,067 | $ | 20,235 | $ | 31,302 | |||||||
Business Segments Nine Months Ended September 30, (Millions of dollars) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Machinery and Engines | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | Asia/Pacific Marketing | Construction & Mining Products | EAME Marketing | Latin America Marketing | Power Products | North America Marketing | All Other | Total | Financing & Insurance Services | Consolidated Total | |||||||||||||||||
External sales and revenues | $ | 1,584 | $ | 438 | $ | 2,843 | $ | 1,265 | $ | 6,211 | $ | 6,722 | $ | 1,076 | $ | 20,139 | $ | 1,745 | $ | 21,884 | |||||||
Intersegment sales & revenues | 445 | 8,993 | 2,606 | 661 | 6,269 | 282 | 1,922 | 21,178 | 1 | 21,179 | |||||||||||||||||
Total sales and revenues | $ | 2,029 | $ | 9,431 | $ | 5,449 | $ | 1,926 | $ | 12,480 | $ | 7,004 | $ | 2,998 | $ | 41,317 | $ | 1,746 | $ | 43,063 | |||||||
Accountable profit (loss) | $ | 107 | $ | 885 | $ | 289 | $ | 142 | $ | 215 | $ | 345 | $ | 503 | $ | 2,486 | $ | 344 | $ | 2,830 | |||||||
Accountable assets at September 30, 2004 | $ | 587 | $ | 2,584 | $ | 1,203 | $ | 720 | $ | 3,855 | $ | 32 | $ | 3,331 | $ | 12,312 | $ | 22,639 | $ | 34,951 | |||||||
2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External sales and revenues | $ | 1,134 | $ | 179 | $ | 2,349 | $ | 808 | $ | 4,804 | $ | 4,822 | $ | 799 | $ | 14,895 | $ | 1,490 | $ | 16,385 | |||||||
Intersegment sales & revenues | 271 | 6,557 | 1,746 | 380 | 4,699 | 173 | 1,886 | 15,712 | 1 | 15,713 | |||||||||||||||||
Total sales and revenues | $ | 1,405 | $ | 6,736 | $ | 4,095 | $ | 1,188 | $ | 9,503 | $ | 4,995 | $ | 2,685 | $ | 30,607 | $ | 1,491 | $ | 32,098 | |||||||
Accountable profit (loss) | $ | 95 | $ | 348 | $ | 177 | $ | 59 | $ | (30) | $ | 203 | $ | 275 | $ | 1,127 | $ | 258 | $ | 1,385 | |||||||
Accountable assets at December 31, 2003 | $ | 627 | $ | 2,190 | $ | 1,018 | 692 | $ | 3,710 | $ | 293 | $ | 2,537 | $ | 11,067 | $ | 20,235 | $ | 31,302 |
Page 12
Reconciliation of Sales & Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | Machinery and Engines | Financing & Insurance Services | Consolidating Adjustments | Consolidated Total | |||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004: | |||||||||||||||
Total external sales and revenues from business segments | $ | 7,116 | $ | 568 | $ | - | $ | 7,684 | |||||||
Other | 59 | (142 | ) | 48 | 1 | (35 | ) | ||||||||
Total sales and revenues | $ | 7,175 | $ | 426 | $ | 48 | $ | 7,649 | |||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2003: | |||||||||||||||
Total external sales and revenues from business segments | $ | 5,053 | $ | 512 | $ | - | $ | 5,565 | |||||||
Other | 59 | (33 | ) | (46 | )1 | (20 | ) | ||||||||
Total sales and revenues | $ | 5,112 | $ | 479 | $ | (46 | ) | $ | 5,545 | ||||||
1 Elimination of Financial Products revenues from Machinery and Engines | |||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Sales & Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | Machinery and Engines | Financing & Insurance Services | Consolidating Adjustments | Consolidated Total | |||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004: | |||||||||||||||
Total external sales and revenues from business segments | $ | 20,139 | $ | 1,745 | $ | - | $ | 21,884 | |||||||
Other | 138 | (204 | ) | (138 | )1 | (204 | ) | ||||||||
Total sales and revenues | $ | 20,277 | $ | 1,541 | $ | (138 | ) | $ | 21,680 | ||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003: | |||||||||||||||
Total external sales and revenues from business segments | $ | 14,895 | $ | 1,490 | $ | - | $ | 16,385 | |||||||
Other | 142 | (96 | ) | (133 | )1 | (87 | ) | ||||||||
Total sales and revenues | $ | 15,037 | $ | 1,394 | $ | (133 | ) | $ | 16,298 | ||||||
1 Elimination of Financial Products revenues from Machinery and Engines | |||||||||||||||
Page 13
Reconciliation of Profit Before Taxes: | ||||||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | Machinery and Engines | Financing & Insurance Services | Consolidated Total | |||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004: | ||||||||||||
Total accountable profit from business segments | $ | 788 | $ | 125 | $ | 913 | ||||||
Corporate costs | (141 | ) | - | (141 | ) | |||||||
Timing | (24 | ) | - | (24 | ) | |||||||
Methodology differences: | ||||||||||||
Inventory/cost of sales | - | - | - | |||||||||
Postretirement benefit expense | (62 | ) | - | (62 | ) | |||||||
Financing costs | 9 | - | 9 | |||||||||
Equity in profit of unconsolidated affiliated companies | (17 | ) | - | (17 | ) | |||||||
Currency | (6 | ) | - | (6 | ) | |||||||
Other methodology differences | (21 | ) | 19 | (2 | ) | |||||||
Other | (7 | ) | - | (7 | ) | |||||||
Total profit before taxes | $ | 519 | $ | 144 | $ | 663 | ||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2003: | ||||||||||||
Total accountable profit from business segments | $ | 325 | $ | 98 | $ | 423 | ||||||
Corporate costs | (163 | ) | - | (163 | ) | |||||||
Timing | 41 | - | 41 | |||||||||
Methodology differences: | ||||||||||||
Inventory/cost of sales | 8 | - | 8 | |||||||||
Postretirement benefit expense | (36 | ) | - | (36 | ) | |||||||
Financing costs | 11 | - | 11 | |||||||||
Equity in profit of unconsolidated affiliated companies | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||
Currency | (6 | ) | - | (6 | ) | |||||||
Other methodology differences | (7 | ) | 7 | - | ||||||||
Other | 13 | - | 13 | |||||||||
Total profit before taxes | $ | 181 | $ | 103 | $ | 284 | ||||||
Reconciliation of Profit Before Taxes: | ||||||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | Machinery and Engines | Financing & Insurance Services | Consolidated Total | |||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004: | ||||||||||||
Total accountable profit from business segments | $ | 2,486 | $ | 344 | $ | 2,830 | ||||||
Corporate costs | (404 | ) | - | (404 | ) | |||||||
Timing | (113 | ) | - | (113 | ) | |||||||
Methodology differences: | ||||||||||||
Inventory/cost of sales | (54 | ) | - | (54 | ) | |||||||
Postretirement benefit expense | (209 | ) | - | (209 | ) | |||||||
Financing costs | 35 | - | 35 | |||||||||
Equity in profit of unconsolidated affiliated companies | (35 | ) | (2 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||||
Currency | (39 | ) | - | (39 | ) | |||||||
Other methodology differences | (63 | ) | 35 | (28 | ) | |||||||
Other | 15 | - | 15 | |||||||||
Total profit before taxes | $ | 1,619 | $ | 377 | $ | 1,996 | ||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003: | ||||||||||||
Total accountable profit from business segments | $ | 1,127 | $ | 258 | $ | 1,385 | ||||||
Corporate costs | (346 | ) | - | (346 | ) | |||||||
Timing | 28 | - | 28 | |||||||||
Methodology differences: | ||||||||||||
Inventory/cost of sales | (3 | ) | - | (3 | ) | |||||||
Postretirement benefit expense | (122 | ) | - | (122 | ) | |||||||
Financing costs | 55 | - | 55 | |||||||||
Equity in profit of unconsolidated affiliated companies | (7 | ) | (4 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||
Currency | (7 | ) | - | (7 | ) | |||||||
Other methodology differences | (16 | ) | 27 | 11 | ||||||||
Other | 22 | - | 22 | |||||||||
Total profit before taxes | $ | 731 | $ | 281 | $ | 1,012 | ||||||
Page 14
Reconciliation of Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | Machinery and Engines | Financing & Insurance Services | Consolidating Adjustments | Consolidated Total | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2004: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total accountable assets from business segments | $ | 12,312 | $ | 22,639 | $ | - | $ | 34,951 | ||||||||||||
Items not included in segment assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and short-term investments | 241 | 176 | - | 417 | ||||||||||||||||
Intercompany trade receivables | 360 | 181 | (553 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Investment in affiliated companies | 334 | - | (1 | ) | 333 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in Financial Products | 2,809 | - | (2,809 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes and prepaids | 2,452 | 87 | (242 | ) | 2,297 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible assets and other assets | 1,937 | - | - | 1,937 | ||||||||||||||||
Service center assets | 925 | - | - | 925 | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities included in segment assets | 1,147 | - | - | 1,147 | ||||||||||||||||
Inventory methodology differences | (2,168 | ) | - | - | (2,168 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other | 602 | - | (35 | ) | 567 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 20,951 | $ | 23,083 | $ | (3,640 | ) | $ | 40,394 | |||||||||||
December 31, 2003: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total accountable assets from business segments | $ | 11,067 | $ | 20,235 | $ | - | $ | 31,302 | ||||||||||||
Items not included in segment assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and short-term investments | 220 | 122 | - | 342 | ||||||||||||||||
Intercompany trade receivables | 572 | 397 | (969 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||
Investment in affiliated companies | 325 | - | - | 325 | ||||||||||||||||
Investment in Financial Products | 2,547 | - | (2,547 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes and prepaids | 2,736 | 77 | (228 | ) | 2,585 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible assets and other assets | 1,874 | - | - | 1,874 | ||||||||||||||||
Service center assets | 895 | - | - | 895 | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities included in segment assets | 925 | - | - | 925 | ||||||||||||||||
Inventory methodology differences | (2,035 | ) | - | - | (2,035 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other | 84 | 168 | - | 252 | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 19,210 | $ | 20,999 | $ | (3,744 | ) | $ | 36,465 | |||||||||||
8. Available-For-Sale Securities
Caterpillar Insurance and Caterpillar Investment Management, Ltd. had investments in certain debt and equity securities at September 30, 2004 that have been classified as available-for-sale in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115 (SFAS 115) and recorded at fair value based upon quoted market prices. These fair values are included in "Other Assets" in the Statement of Financial Position. Unrealized gains and losses arising from the revaluation of available-for-sale securities are included, net of applicable deferred income taxes, in equity ("Accumulated other comprehensive income" in the Statement of Financial Position). Realized gains and losses on sales of investments are determined using the specific identification method for debt instruments and the FIFO method for equity securities. Realized ga ins and losses are included in "Other income (expense)" in the Statement of Results of Operations.
September 30, 2004 | |||||||||||
Unrealized | |||||||||||
Pretax Net | |||||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | Cost Basis | Gains (Losses) | Fair Value | ||||||||
Government debt | $ | 233 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 232 | ||||
Corporate bonds | 331 | 1 | 332 | ||||||||
Equity securities | 206 | 10 | 216 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 770 | $ | 10 | $ | 780 | |||||
Page 15
December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | Cost Basis | Unrealized Pretax Net Gains (Losses) | Fair Value | ||||||||
Government debt | $ | 102 | $ | - | $ | 102 | |||||
Corporate bonds | 288 | 3 | 291 | ||||||||
Equity securities | 191 | 21 | 212 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 581 | $ | 24 | $ | 605 | |||||
Investments in an unrealized loss position that are not other-than-temporarily impaired: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months(1) | More than 12 months(1) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | |||||||||||||||||
Government debt | $ | 124 | $ | 1 | $ | 8 | $ | - | $ | 132 | $ | 1 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 132 | 1 | 34 | 2 | 166 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 79 | 3 | - | - | �� | 79 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 335 | $ | 5 | $ | 42 | $ | 2 | $ | 377 | $ | 7 | |||||||||||
(1)Indicates length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
The fair value of the available-for-sale debt securities at September 30, 2004, by contractual maturity, is shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay and creditors may have the right to call obligations.
(Millions of dollars) | Fair Value | |||
Due in one year or less | $ | 19 | ||
Due after one year through five years | $ | 265 | ||
Due after five years through ten years | $ | 36 | ||
Due after ten years | $ | 244 | ||
Proceeds from sales of investments in debt and equity securities during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $208 million and $343 million, respectively. Proceeds were $201 million and $280 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively. Gross gains of $2 million and $5 million and gross losses of $2 million and $5 million were included in current earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively. Gross gains of $3 million and gross losses of $1 million were included in current earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively.
In accordance with the application of SFAS 115, we recognized pretax charges of $8 million and $32 million for "other than temporary" declines in the market value of securities in the Cat Insurance investment portfolio for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively. These charges were accounted for as realized losses and were included in "Other income (expense)" in the Statement of Results of Operations. The cost basis of the impacted securities were adjusted to reflect these charges. No such charges were recognized through the first nine months of 2004.
9. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Our earnings and cash flow are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. Our "Risk Management Policy" (policy) allows for the use of derivative financial instruments to prudently manage foreign currency exchange rate, interest rate and commodity price exposure. Our derivative activities are subject to the management, direction and control of our Financial Officers. Risk management practices, including the use of financial derivative instruments, are presented to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors at least annually.
Page 16
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Foreign currency exchange rate movements create a degree of risk by affecting the U.S. dollar value of sales made and costs incurred in foreign currencies. Movements in foreign currency rates also affect our competitive position as these changes may affect business practices and/or pricing strategies of non-U.S. based competitors. Additionally, we have balance sheet positions denominated in foreign currency thereby creating exposure to movements in exchange rates.
Our Machinery and Engines operations purchase, manufacture and sell products in many locations around the world. As we have a diversified revenue and cost base, we manage our future foreign currency cash flow exposure on a net basis. We use foreign currency forward and option contracts to manage unmatched foreign currency cash inflow and outflow. Our objective is to minimize the risk of exchange rate movements that would reduce the U.S. dollar value of our foreign currency cash flow. Our policy allows for managing anticipated foreign currency cash flow for up to four years.
We generally designate as cash flow hedges at inception of the contract any Australian dollar, Brazilian real, British pound, Canadian dollar, euro, Japanese yen, Mexican peso or Singapore dollar forward or option contracts that exceed 90 days in duration. Designation is performed on a specific exposure basis to support hedge accounting. The remainder of Machinery and Engines foreign currency contracts are undesignated. As of September 30, 2004, $62 million of deferred net gains included in equity (“Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the Statement of Financial Position) are expected to be reclassified to current earnings (“Other income (expense)”) over the next twelve months when earnings are negatively affected by the hedged transactions. As of September 30, 2003, this projected reclassification was a gain of $23 million. These amounts are based on September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003 exchange rates, respectively. The actual amount recorded in other income/expense will vary based on exchange rates at the time the hedged transactions impact earnings. There were no circumstances where hedge treatment was discontinued during the three or nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 or 2003.
In managing foreign currency risk for our Financial Products operations, our objective is to minimize earnings volatility resulting from conversion and the remeasurement of net foreign currency balance sheet positions. Our policy allows the use of foreign currency forward contracts to offset the risk of currency mismatch between our receivables and debt. All such foreign currency forward contracts are undesignated.
Gains / (losses) included in current earnings [Other income (expense)] on undesignated contracts: | ||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||
Machinery and Engines: | ||||||||
On undesignated contracts | $ | - | $ | 1 | ||||
Financial Products: | ||||||||
On undesignated contracts | $ | 2 | $ | (21 | ) |
Gains / (losses) included in current earnings [Other income (expense)] on undesignated contracts: | ||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||
Machinery and Engines: | ||||||||
On undesignated contracts | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 5 | |||
Financial Products: | ||||||||
On undesignated contracts | $ | 19 | $ | (71 | ) | |||
Gains and losses on the Financial Products contracts above are substantially offset by balance sheet remeasurement and conversion gains and losses.
Page 17
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate movements create a degree of risk by affecting the amount of our interest payments and the value of our fixed rate debt. Our policy is to use interest rate swap agreements and forward rate agreements to manage our exposure to interest rate changes and lower the cost of borrowed funds.
Machinery and Engines operations generally use fixed rate debt as a source of funding. Our objective is to minimize the cost of borrowed funds. Our policy allows us to enter into fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps and forward rate agreements to meet that objective with the intent to designate as fair value hedges at inception of the contract all fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps. Designation as a hedge of the fair value of our fixed rate debt is performed to support hedge accounting. During 2001, our Machinery and Engines operations liquidated all fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps. Deferred gains on liquidated fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps, which were previously designated as fair value hedges, are being amortized to earnings ratably over the remaining life of the hedged debt. We designate as cash flow hedges at inception of the contract all forward rate agreements. Designation as a hedge of the anticipated issuance of debt is performed to support hedge accounting. Machinery and Engines forward rate agreements are 100 percent effective.
Financial Products operations have a "match funding" objective whereby, within specified boundaries, the interest rate profile (fixed rate or floating rate) of their debt portfolio matches the interest rate profile of their receivables. In connection with that objective, we use interest rate derivative instruments to modify the debt structure to match the receivable portfolio. This "match funding" reduces the volatility of margins between interest-bearing assets and interest-bearing liabilities, regardless of which direction interest rates move. We also use these instruments to gain an economic and/or competitive advantage through lower cost of borrowed funds. This is accomplished by changing the characteristics of existing debt instruments or entering into new agreements in combination with the issuance of new debt.
Our policy allows us to use floating-to-fixed, fixed-to-floating, and floating-to-floating interest rate swaps to meet the "match funding" objective. To support hedge accounting, we designate fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps as fair value hedges of the fair value of our fixed rate debt at inception of the contract. Financial Products policy is to designate most floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of the variability of future cash flows at inception of the contract. During 2002, our Financial Products operations liquidated four fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps. As a result, the fair value adjustment of the original debt is being amortized to earnings ratably over the remaining life of the hedged debt.
Gains / (losses) included in current earnings [Other income (expense)]: | |||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps | |||||||||
Machinery and Engines: | |||||||||
Gain/(loss) on liquidated swaps | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | |||||
Financial Products: | |||||||||
Gain/(loss) on designated interest rate derivatives | 42 | 1 | |||||||
Gain/(loss) on hedged debt | (42 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||
$ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||||
Page 18
Gains / (losses) included in current earnings [Other income (expense)]: | |||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps | |||||||||
Machinery and Engines: | |||||||||
Gain/(loss) on liquidated swaps | $ | 3 | $ | 5 | |||||
Financial Products: | |||||||||
Gain/(loss) on designated interest rate derivatives | 3 | 9 | |||||||
Gain/(loss) on hedged debt | (3 | ) | (9 | ) | |||||
Gain/(loss) on liquidated swaps - included in interest expense | 1 | 1 | |||||||
$ | 4 | $ | 6 | ||||||
As of September 30, 2004 and 2003, $10 million and $21 million, respectively, of deferred net losses included in equity (“Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the Statement of Financial Position), related to Financial Products floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps, is expected to be reclassified to current earnings (“Interest expense of Financial Products”) over the next twelve months.
The reclassification of the remaining deferred amount to current earnings ("Other income (expense)") will occur over a maximum of 27 years. There were no circumstances where hedge treatment was discontinued during the three or nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 or 2003.
Commodity Price Risk
Commodity price movements create a degree of risk by affecting the price we must pay for certain raw material. Our policy is to use commodity forward and option contracts to manage the commodity risk and reduce the cost of purchased materials.
Our Machinery and Engines operations purchase aluminum, copper and nickel embedded in the components we purchase from suppliers. Our suppliers pass on to us price changes in the commodity portion of the component cost.
Our objective is to minimize volatility in the price of these commodities. Our policy allows us to enter commodity forward and option contracts to lock in the purchase price of the commodities within a four-year horizon. All such commodity forward and option contracts are undesignated. Gains on the undesignated contracts of $6 million and $11 million were recorded in current earnings ("Other income (expense)") for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004. Gains on the undesignated contracts of $7 million and $8 million were recorded in current earnings ("Other income (expense)") for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003.
10. Guarantees and product warranty
We have guaranteed to repurchase loans of certain Caterpillar dealers from the Dealer Capital Asset Trust (DCAT) in the event of default. These guarantees arose in conjunction with Cat Financial's relationship with third party dealers who sell Caterpillar equipment. These guarantees have terms ranging from one to four years and are secured primarily by dealer assets. At September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 amounts outstanding under these guarantees were $364 million and $380 million, respectively. The related book value was $10 million and $5 million at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
Our product warranty liability is determined by applying historical claim rate experience to the current field population and dealer inventory. Effective in the third quarter 2004, we revised our process to utilize more detailed claim rates by product. This provides more comprehensive information for management. This change did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
(Millions of dollars) | 2004 | ||
Warranty liability, January 1 | $ | 622 | |
Payments | (389 | ) | |
Provision for warranty | 497 | ||
Other | 25 | 1 | |
Warranty liability, September 30 | $ | 755 | |
1 Additions due to acquisitions | |||
Page 19
(Millions of dollars) | 2003 | ||
Warranty liability, January 1 | $ | 693 | |
Payments | (484 | ) | |
Provision for warranty | 413 | ||
Warranty liability, December 31 | $ | 622 | |
11. Computations of Profit Per Share
Three Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||
(Dollars in millions except per share data) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||
I. | Profit for the period (A): | $ | 498 | $ | 222 | ||||
II. | Determination of shares (millions): | ||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (B) | 341.8 | 346.3 | |||||||
Shares issuable on exercise of stock options, net of shares assumed to be purchased out of proceeds at average market price | 11.2 | 9.8 | |||||||
Average common shares outstanding for fully diluted computation (C) | 353.0 | 356.1 | |||||||
III. | Profit per share of common stock: | ||||||||
Assuming no dilution (A/B) | $ | 1.45 | $ | 0.64 | |||||
Assuming full dilution (A/C) | $ | 1.41 | $ | 0.62 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||
(Dollars in millions except per share data) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||
I. | Profit for the period (A): | $ | 1,484 | $ | 750 | ||||
II. | Determination of shares (millions): | ||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (B) | 342.3 | 345.1 | |||||||
Shares issuable on exercise of stock options, net of shares assumed to be purchased out of proceeds at average market price | 11.9 | 3.9 | |||||||
Average common shares outstanding for fully diluted computation (C) | 354.2 | 349.0 | |||||||
III. | Profit per share of common stock: | ||||||||
Assuming no dilution (A/B) | $ | 4.34 | $ | 2.17 | |||||
Assuming full dilution (A/C) | $ | 4.19 | $ | 2.15 | |||||
Stock options to purchase 8,973,264 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $77.28 were outstanding as of September 30, 2004, but were not included in the computation of diluted profit per share because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares on September 30, 2004. In 2003, all stock options were included in the computation of diluted profit per share.
Page 20
12. Postretirement Benefits
A. Pension and postretirement benefit costs
(Millions of Dollars) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Pension Benefits | Non-U.S. Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||
For the three months ended: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 36 | $ | 30 | $ | 12 | $ | 11 | $ | 15 | $ | 17 | |||||||||||||
Interest cost | 137 | 139 | 22 | 21 | 58 | 75 | |||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (178 | ) | (174 | ) | (24 | ) | (24 | ) | (19 | ) | (22 | ) | |||||||||||||
Amortization of: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset existing at adoption of SFAS 87 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (1) | 11 | 12 | 2 | 1 | (12 | ) | (12 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss (gain) | 35 | 7 | 9 | 4 | (3 | ) | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total cost (benefit) included in results of operations | $ | 41 | $ | 14 | $ | 22 | $ | 14 | $ | 39 | $ | 67 | |||||||||||||
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net cost: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate | 6.2 | % | 7.0 | % | 5.1 | % | 5.4 | % | 6.2 | % | 7.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | 9.0 | % | 9.0 | % | 7.4 | % | 7.1 | % | 9.0 | % | 9.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 3.2 | % | 3.3 | % | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | |||||||||||||
(1) Prior service costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the average remaining service period to the full retirement eligibility date of employees expected to receive benefits from the plan amendment. |
(Millions of Dollars) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Pension Benefits | Non-U.S. Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||
For the nine months ended: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 108 | $ | 90 | $ | 36 | $ | 32 | $ | 49 | $ | 51 | |||||||||||||
Interest cost | 411 | 417 | 66 | 62 | 200 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (519 | ) | (504 | ) | (72 | ) | (71 | ) | (55 | ) | (66 | ) | |||||||||||||
Amortization of: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset existing at adoption of SFAS 87 | - | - | 3 | 3 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (1) | 33 | 36 | 6 | 3 | (36 | ) | (35 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss (gain) | 105 | 21 | 27 | 11 | 35 | 27 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total cost (benefit) included in results of operations | $ | 138 | $ | 60 | $ | 66 | $ | 40 | $ | 193 | $ | 202 | |||||||||||||
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net cost: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate | 6.2 | % | 7.0 | % | 5.1 | % | 5.4 | % | 6.2 | % | 7.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | 9.0 | % | 9.0 | % | 7.4 | % | 7.1 | % | 9.0 | % | 9.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 3.2 | % | 3.3 | % | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | |||||||||||||
(1) Prior service costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the average remaining service period to the full retirement eligibility date of employees expected to receive benefits from the plan amendment. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Page 21
Our U.S. postretirement health care plans provide for prescription drug benefits. On December 8, 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act) was signed into law. The Act introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare (Medicare Part D) as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. In January 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 106-1 (FSP 106-1), Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. As permitted by FSP 106-1, we made a one-time election to defer accounting for the effects of the Act pending further guidance from the FASB.
In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 106-2 (FSP 106-2), which superseded FSP 106-1. FSP 106-2 provides accounting guidance to employers that have determined that prescription drug benefits available under their retiree health care benefit plans are at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. The FSP requires that the benefit attributable to past service be accounted for as an actuarial gain and the benefit related to current service be reported as a reduction in service cost.
We have determined that most of our U.S. retiree health care plans are at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D and will qualify for the federal subsidy. In the third quarter of 2004, we adopted FSP 106-2 retroactive to December 31, 2003 (the period end that includes the date of the Act’s enactment) as permitted by the FSP. The impact was a reduction in our accumulated postretirement benefit obligation of $284 million related to benefits attributed to past service. Because the federal subsidy is tax exempt, no tax was provided for the benefit in the provision for income taxes. This lowered our estimated annual tax rate approximately one-half of a percent. The reduction in the components of 2004 net periodic postretirement benefits expense was as follows:
2004 | |||||||||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | First Quarter | Second Quarter | Third Quarter | Nine Months Ended Sept 30 | |||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 3 | |||||||
Interest cost | 3 | 5 | 5 | 13 | |||||||||||
Amortization of actuarial gain | 4 | 8 | 9 | 21 | |||||||||||
Total reduction in net periodic postretirement benefit cost | $ | 8 | $ | 14 | $ | 15 | $ | 37 | |||||||
B. Defined contribution benefit costs
Total company costs related to U.S. and non-U.S. defined contribution plans were the following:
Three Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
(Millions of dollars) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||
U.S. Plans | $ | 21 | $ | 26 | |||
Non-U.S. Plans | 3 | 3 | |||||
$ | 24 | $ | 29 | ||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
(Millions of dollars) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||
U.S. Plans | $ | 74 | $ | 75 | |||
Non-U.S. Plans | 9 | 9 | |||||
$ | 83 | $ | 84 | ||||
Page 22
13. Acquisitions
Parts and Accessories Distribution Business of MG Rover Ltd.
In August 2004, we acquired the global parts and accessories business of U.K. auto manufacturer MG Rover, a wholly owned subsidiary of Phoenix Venture Holdings Limited, for $178 million, including $169 million at closing (subject to certain post-closing adjustments) and a $9 million promissory note to be paid in 2006. The business acquired includes the sourcing, marketing, distribution and sale of automotive service parts and accessories to MG Rover dealers, distributors, importers and other related customers worldwide.
The transaction, which was financed with available cash and commercial paper borrowings, was accounted for by the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the results of the acquired business for the period from the acquisition date are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and reported in the “All Other” segment. Net tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed of$73 million were recorded at their fair values. Finite-lived intangible assets acquired of $87 million relate primarily to technology and trademark rights, and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 and 20 years, respectively. Goodwill of $18 million represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net tangible and finite-lived intangible assets acquired. Assuming this transaction had been made at January 1, 2004, the consolidated pro forma results for the third quarter and year-to-date would not be materially different from reported results.
Williams Technologies, Inc.
In September 2004, we acquired Williams Technologies, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Remy International, Inc., for $105 million, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. Williams Technologies, Inc. is a leading remanufacturer of automatic transmissions, torque converters and engines for automotive and medium and heavy-duty truck applications. This acquisition represents an expansion of our remanufacturing operations into the automotive powertrain remanufacturing business.
The transaction, which was financed with available cash and commercial paper borrowings, was accounted for by the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the results of the acquired business for the period from the acquisition date are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and reported in the “All Other” segment. Net tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed of $25 million were recorded at their fair values. Finite-lived intangible assets acquired of $43 million relate primarily to customer relationships, and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years. Goodwill of $37 million represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net tangible and finite-lived intangible assets acquired. Assuming this transaction had been made at January 1, 2004, the consolidated pro forma results for the third quarter and year to date would not be materially different from reported results.
Page 23
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
A.Overview
We reported record sales and revenues of $7.65 billion for the third quarter and record third-quarter profit of $498 million, or $1.41 per share. Results for the nine months ended September 30 are the best in company history with sales and revenues of $21.68 billion and profit of $1.48 billion, or $4.19 per share.
The year-to-date results reflect our unwavering focus on serving Caterpillar customers in a year that has continued to gain strength and momentum. Our entire value chain is responding to the strongest recovery we’ve ever seen across the broad spectrum of markets we serve. We will deliver record sales and profit this year.
Third-quarter sales and revenues were $7.65 billion, up $2.10 billion or 38 percent compared to $5.55 billion in the third quarter one year ago. The increase in sales and revenues was driven by $1.83 billion of higherMachinery and Engines volume, $136 million of increasedPrice Realization, a $102 million favorable impact ofCurrency on sales due primarily to the strengthening euro and British pound and $41 million of higherFinancial Products revenues.
Profit of $498 million or $1.41 per share was up $276 million or 124 percent compared to $222 million or $0.62 per share in the third quarter of 2003. The main contributors to the profit increase were higherSales Volume of $543 million, higher price realization of $136 million and the absence of a $55 million non-recurring bond retirement charge recorded in the third quarter of 2003. Partially offsetting these favorable items were $371 million of higherCore Operating Costs.
We are encouraged by the improved operating profit generated from each of our major lines of business this quarter.Machinery profit was up 78 percent,Engines was up 96 percent and Financial Products was up 40 percent.
While we’re pleased with the profit improvement delivered this quarter, higher material costs and inefficiencies related to supply chain bottlenecks affecting our global industry limited the profit pull-through we would expect to see with this strong sales growth. Looking forward, continued global economic growth will likely sustain external cost pressures in the near term, but we are aggressively managing this upturn with a determination to improve our cost structure.
We are drawing on the power of an engaged workforce and6 Sigma process improvements to drive almost a 40 percent increase in our machinery and engines physical production. This exemplifies the extraordinary efforts our team is making to satisfy customer demand and maintain our industry leadership position.
We expect 2004 sales and revenues to be up about 30 percent and profit per share to be up 80 to 85 percent compared to 2003. This outlook is in line with the projection issued on September 28, 2004.
While global economic growth in 2005 is expected to slow slightly from the robust levels we’ve experienced this year, the key sectors we serve should continue to show solid growth next year. Our products are instrumental in increasing capacity in the mining, oil and gas, North American on-highway truck and bus, and infrastructure development sectors.
Based on our preliminary outlook, we expect 2005 sales and revenues to be up about 10 percent from 2004 with record profit per share.
Note: Glossary of terms included on pages 38-39; first occurrence of terms shown in bold italics.
Page 24
B.Consolidated Results of Operations
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 COMPARED WITH THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
SALES AND REVENUES
The chart above graphically illustrates reasons for the change in Consolidated Sales and Revenues between third quarter 2003 (at left) and third quarter 2004 (at right). Items favorably impacting sales and revenues appear as upward stair steps with the corresponding dollar amounts above each bar. Caterpillar management utilizes these charts internally to visually communicate with its Board and employees. |
Sales and Revenues (Millions of dollars) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | North America | EAME | Latin America | Asia/ Pacific | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Machinery | $ | 4,699 | $ | 2,597 | $ | 1,106 | $ | 422 | $ | 574 | ||||||||||
Engines* | 2,476 | 1,100 | 747 | 214 | 415 | |||||||||||||||
Financial Products** | 474 | 336 | 81 | 25 | 32 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 7,649 | $ | 4,033 | $ | 1,934 | $ | 661 | $ | 1,021 | |||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Machinery | $ | 3,250 | $ | 1,760 | $ | 842 | $ | 230 | $ | 418 | ||||||||||
Engines* | 1,862 | 808 | 576 | 232 | 246 | |||||||||||||||
Financial Products** | 433 | 308 | 78 | 25 | 22 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 5,545 | $ | 2,876 | $ | 1,496 | $ | 487 | $ | 686 | |||||||||||
* Does not include internal engine transfers of $471 million and $341 million in third quarter 2004 and third quarter 2003, respectively. Internal engine transfers are valued at prices comparable to those for unrelated parties. | ||||||||||||||||||||
** Does not include revenues earned from Machinery and Engines of ($48) million and $46 million in third quarter 2004 and third quarter 2003, respectively. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Refer to table on page 28 for reconciliation of Machinery and Engine Sales by Geographic Region to External Sales by Marketing Segment. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Page 25
Machinery sales were $4.70 billion, 45 percent or $1.45 billion higher than in third quarter 2003. Sales volume increased 40 percent, improved price realization accounted for about 3 percent and the favorable impact of currency added the remaining 2 percent. Volume increased primarily due to a 23 percent increase in dealer deliveries to end users and an associated increase in dealer inventories. As dealers respond to higher demand, their inventories typically increase since more machines are in transit to dealers and their customers. The shipping pattern this quarter, with a concentration in the last half, further increased such inventories since dealers did not have sufficient time to fully convert late-quarter shipments into deliveries. Even with those temporary increases, dealer inventories relative to deliveries were almost a half month lower than a year earlier. In North America, sales increased 48 percent from third quarter 2003, 43 percent due to higher volume and the remainder due to improved price realization. The volume gain resulted from a 32 percent increase in dealer deliveries and a comparable increase in dealer inventories. Low interest rates continued to benefit construction and higher coal prices caused the recovery in coal production to accelerate. Sales inEAME increased 31 percent, with volume contributing about 24 percent, the favorable currency impact of a stronger euro accounting for about 5 percent and the remainder due to improved price realization. The volume increase was concentrated late in the quarter, so its initial impact was to significantl y increase dealer inventories rather than deliveries. The economic environment was favorable; construction improved in Europe, and many countries in both Africa/Middle East and the CIS continued to benefit from higher energy and metals prices. InLatin America, sales surged 83 percent above third quarter 2003 sales, 78 percent due to higher volume and the remainder due to improved price realization. Dealers increased deliveries 64 percent and their inventories increased in line with deliveries. As in the prior quarter, higher metals and coal prices led to large gains in dealer deliveries into mining, and a strengthening of the economic recovery boosted construction. Sales in Asia/Pacific increased 37 percent, largely due to volume. Dealers increased deliveries to end users 23 percent, requiring some increase in their inventories. Deliver ies in China were well below last year’s third quarter because the government limited development projects. That decline was more than offset by much higher deliveries into mining in both Indonesia and Australia.
Engines sales were $2.48 billion, an increase of $614 million or 33 percent from third quarter 2003. Sales volume was up about 29 percent, the favorable impact of currency accounted for about 3 percent and improved price realization added about 1 percent.
Engine sales increased in North America, EAME and Asia/Pacific, and decreased in Latin America. The North America engine sales gain of 36 percent was heavily impacted by a 57 percent increase in sales of on-highway truck engines, as improved industry health drove a continuation of fleet expansion and replacement. Sales of engines to the electric power sector increased 34 percent compared to last year’s third quarter benefiting from increased focus on high quality power for communication and data systems, as well as growth in non-residential construction. Sales of engines to the industrial sector rose 56 percent, with increases in demand for nearly all types of industrial original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) products and increased preference for Caterpillar engines. Sales of petroleum engines rose 17 percent as deliveries of reciprocating engines for gas compression increased, along with renewed demand to maximize production of existing wells. Sales of engines to the marine sector increased 19 percent due to continued demand for pleasure craft engines. Engine sales rose 30 percent in EAME with strong increases in all sectors. Sales of engines into the electric power sector increased 36 percent due to stronger demand for prime and cogeneration systems, Middle Eastern demand for large engines and power modules, and favorable currency versus euro-based competition. Sales of engines to the petroleum sector increased 42 percent, due primarily to increased sales of turbines and turbine-related services to support increases in petroleum investment. Engine sales in Latin America decreased 8 percent, primarily due to the absence of a large turbine electric power project that occurred during third quarter 2003. Widespread economic growth in Asia/Pacific contributed to the 69 percent engine sales increase. Sales of engines into the ele ctric power sector more than doubled with gains in large prime and continuous power installations, rental fleet investments, and sales to support ongoing demand in China driven by transmission constraints. Sales of petroleum engines increased 76 percent as exploration and production increased in China, Indonesia and other areas. Marine engines sales increased 11 percent due to increased demand for dredge equipment in support of construction growth, as well as offshore supply boats and pleasure craft.
Financial Products revenues were $474 million, an increase of $41 million or 9 percent from third quarter 2003. The increase was due primarily to the favorable impact of $52 million from continued growth ofEarning Assets, partially offset by a $14 million impact of lower interest rates on new and existing finance receivables at Cat Financial.
Page 26
OPERATING PROFIT
The chart above graphically illustrates reasons for the change in Consolidated Operating Profit between third quarter 2003 (at left) and third quarter 2004 (at right). Items favorably impacting operating profit appear as upward stair steps with the corresponding dollar amounts above each bar, while items negatively impacting operating profit appear as downward stair steps with dollar amounts reflected in parentheses above each bar. Caterpillar management utilizes these charts internally to visually communicate with its Board and employees. |
Higher sales volume in all regions and most industries resulted in a favorable operating profit impact of $543 million. Operating profit was also favorably impacted by improved price realization of $136 million, improved profitability at Financial Products of $37 million and the absence of $36 million ofNon-Conformance Penalties (NCPs)that were recorded in the third quarter 2003.
Partially offsetting the favorable items were $371 million in higher core operating costs, a $56 million unfavorable impact of currency on operating profit due primarily to the weakening of the dollar compared with the British pound and the Japanese yen and $24 million of higherRetirement Benefits.
We continued to meet unprecedented customer demand and satisfy our customers in the third quarter, despite incurring additional core operating costs to respond to the steep market upturn. The additional core operating costs reflect increases in manufacturing costs to satisfy customer requirements and higher general support costs to meet demand. The incremental costs associated with higher material costs resulting from steel surcharges and commodity price increases, higher freight and expediting costs to ensure timely delivery of materials, manufacturing inefficiencies due to the steep ramp-up of production, and premiums due to supplier capacity restraints totaled roughly $150 million. The remainder of the core operating cost increase is largely attributable to increased warranty expense as well as planned spendin g on product development and general support programs. These unfavorable items were partially offset by ongoing cost reductions resulting from hundreds of 6 Sigma projects.
Operating Profit (Loss) (Millions of Dollars) | |||||||
Three months ended September 30, | |||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||
Machinery1 | $ | 426 | $ | 239 | |||
Engines1 | 157 | 80 | |||||
Financial Products | 129 | 92 | |||||
Consolidating Adjustments2 | (34 | ) | (26 | ) | |||
$ | 678 | $ | 385 | ||||
1 Caterpillar operations are highly integrated; therefore, the company uses a number of allocations to determine lines of business operating profit for Machinery and Engines. | |||||||
2 Consolidating adjustments consist of eliminations of transactions between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products. | |||||||
Machinery operating profit of $426 million was up $187 million, or 78 percent, from third quarter 2003. The favorable impact of higher sales volume and improved price realization was partially offset by higher core operating costs (as outlined above), the unfavorable impact of currency and higher retirement benefits.
Engines operating profit of $157 million was up $77 million, or 96 percent, from third quarter 2003. The favorable impact of higher sales volume, the absence of NCPs and improved price realization were partially offset by higher core operating costs (as outlined above).
Financial Products operating profitof $129 million was up $37 million, or 40 percent, from third quarter 2003. The increase was primarily due to a favorable impact from the growth of earning assets at Cat Financial and a favorable reserve adjustment at Cat Insurance.
Page 27
Reconciliation of Machinery and Engine Sales by Geographic Region to External Sales by Marketing Segment | |||||||
Three months ended September 30, | |||||||
(Millions of Dollars) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||
North American Geographic Region | $ | 3,697 | $ | 2,568 | |||
Engine sales included in the Power Products segment | (1,100 | ) | (808 | ) | |||
Company owned dealer sales included in the All Other segment | (137 | ) | (97 | ) | |||
Other* | (171 | ) | (51 | ) | |||
North American Marketing external sales | $ | 2,289 | $ | 1,612 | |||
EAME Geographic Region | $ | 1,853 | $ | 1,418 | |||
Power Products sales not included in the EAME Marketing segment | (738 | ) | (446 | ) | |||
Other* | (159 | ) | (225 | ) | |||
EAME Marketing external sales | $ | 956 | $ | 747 | |||
Latin America Geographic Region | $ | 636 | $ | 462 | |||
Power Products sales not included in the Latin America Marketing segment | (214 | ) | (210 | ) | |||
Other* | 77 | 38 | |||||
Latin America Marketing external sales | $ | 499 | $ | 290 | |||
Asia/Pacific Geographic Region | $ | 989 | $ | 664 | |||
Power Products sales not included in the Asia/Pacific Marketing segment | (292 | ) | (247 | ) | |||
Other* | (211 | ) | (73 | ) | |||
Asia/Pacific Marketing external sales | $ | 486 | $ | 344 | |||
* Represents primarily external sales of the Construction and Mining Products and the All Other segments. | |||||||
Page 28
OTHER PROFIT/LOSS ITEMS
Other income/expensewasincome of $45 million compared with expense of $40 million in third quarter 2003 for a favorable impact of $85 million. The favorable change was due mainly to the absence of a $55 million non-recurring bond retirement charge recorded in the third quarter of 2003.
Also, Caterpillar’s profit and cash flows are subject to fluctuation due to changes in foreign exchange rates. The company uses currency forward and option contracts to reduce the impact of exchange rate changes. The result of this activity in the third quarter on Machinery and Engines other income/expense was favorable $31 million. This reduced the net unfavorable impact of currency on profit before tax to $25 million compared to third quarter 2003.
The provision for income taxes in the third quarter reflects an estimated annual tax rate of 27.5 percent for 2004. We are anticipating a 27.5 percent rate for the full year compared to 27 percent in 2003 primarily due to a change in our geographic mix of profits, partially offset by the change in retirement benefits discussed on page 42. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (Act) was enacted on October 22, 2004. Among other things, the Act repeals an export tax incentive provided under the FSC Repeal and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act of 2000 beginning in 2005, creates a new deduction for qualified domestic production activities, and provides for a temporary incentive to repatriate accumulated income earned abroad. It is unclear under FAS 109 whether the new deduction for production activities will require a decrease in the enacted tax rate used to value a significant portion of our U.S. based deferred tax assets. Guidance from the FASB on this issue is expected in the fourth quarter of 2004. If the deduction is treated as a U.S. tax rate reduction, we expect a significant increase in our 2004 provision for income taxes. While we are also currently studying the impact of the one-time favorable foreign dividend provisions, as of September 30, 2004 and based on the tax laws in effect at that time, we had not changed our intentions to indefinitely reinvest our undistributed foreign earnings and, accordingly, no additional deferred tax liability has been recorded as a result of this legislation.
The equity in profit/loss of unconsolidated affiliated companies favorably impacted profit by$10 million over third quarter a year ago, primarily driven by increased profitability at Shin Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd.
EMPLOYMENT
At the end of third quarter 2004, Caterpillar's worldwide employment was 75,530 compared with 68,006 one year ago. The increase is primarily due to hourly labor additions to support increased volume and the addition of approximately 2,500 employees from acquisitions and growing Caterpillar Logistics operations.
OTHER MATTERS
Environmental and Legal Matters
The company is regulated by federal, state, and international environmental laws governing our use of substances and control of emissions in all our operations. Compliance with these existing laws has not had a material impact on our capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position.
We are cleaning up hazardous waste at a number of locations, often with other companies, pursuant to federal and state laws. When it is likely we will pay clean-up costs at a site and those costs can be estimated, the costs are charged against our earnings. In doing that estimate, we do not consider amounts expected to be recovered from insurance companies and others.
The amount accrued for environmental clean-up is not material and is included in "Accrued expenses" in the Statement of Financial Position. If a range of liability estimates is available on a particular site, we accrue at the lower end of that range.
We cannot estimate costs on sites in the very early stages of clean-up. Currently, we have five sites in the very early stages of clean-up, and there is no more than a remote chance that a material amount for clean-up will be required.
Pursuant to a consent decree Caterpillar entered with the EPA, the company was required to meet certain emission standards by October 2002. The decree provides that if engine manufacturers were unable to meet the standards at that time, they would be required to pay a Non-Conformance Penalty (NCP) on each engine sold that did not meet the standard. The amount of the NCP would be based on how close to meeting the standard the engine came - the more out of compliance the higher the penalty. The company began introduction of fully compliant ACERT engines in 2003 and by the end of 2003 Caterpillar was only producing fully compliant engine models. As a result, NCPs are not payable for any engines built in 2004. The company’s operating profit was favorably impacted in the third quarter 2004 and year to date 2004 b y $36 million and $132 million, respectively, due to the absence of NCPs that were recorded in those periods in 2003.
Page 29
In addition, the consent decree required Caterpillar to pay a fine of $25 million, which was expensed in 1998 and to make investments totaling $35 million in environmental-related products by July 7, 2007. Total qualifying investments to date for these projects are $33 million, of which $2 million was made in the first nine months of 2004. A future benefit is expected to be realized from these environmental projects related to Caterpillar's ability to capitalize on the technologies it developed in complying with its environmental project obligations. In short, Caterpillar expects to receive a positive net return on the environmental projects by being able to market the technology it developed.
We are a party to litigation matters and claims that are normal in the course of its operations, and, while the results of such litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes, based on the advice of counsel, the final outcome of such matters will not have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated financial position.
On January 16, 2002, Caterpillar commenced an action in the Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Illinois in Peoria, Illinois, against Navistar International Transportation Corporation and International Truck and Engine Corporation (collectively Navistar). The lawsuit arises out of a long-term purchase contract between Caterpillar and Navistar effective May 31, 1988, as amended from time to time (the Purchase Agreement). The pending complaint alleges that Navistar breached its contractual obligations by: (i) paying Caterpillar $8.08 less per fuel injector than the agreed upon price for new unit injectors delivered by Caterpillar; (ii) refusing to pay contractually agreed upon surcharges owed as a result of Navistar ordering less than planned volumes of replacement unit injectors; and (iii) refusing to pay contractually agreed upon interest stemming from Navistar’s late payments. At September 30, 2004, the past due receivable from Navistar regarding the foregoing was $139 million. The pending complaint also has claims alleging that Franklin Power Products, Inc., Newstream Enterprises, and Navistar, collectively and individually, failed to pay the applicable price for shipments of unit injectors to Franklin and Newstream. At September 30, 2004, the past due receivables for the foregoing totaled $12 million. The pending complaint further alleges that Sturman Industries, Inc., and Sturman Engine Systems, Inc., colluded with Navistar to utilize technology that Sturman Industries, Inc., misappropriated from Caterpillar to help Navistar develop its G2 fuel system, and tortiously interfered with the Purchase Agreement and Caterpillar’s prospective economic relationship with Navistar. The pending complaint further alleges that the two parties’ collusion led Navistar to select Sturman Engine Sy stems, Inc. and another company, instead of Caterpillar, to develop and manufacture the G2 fuel system.
On May 7, 2002, International Truck and Engine Corporation (International) commenced an action against Caterpillar in the Circuit Court of DuPage County, Illinois that alleges Caterpillar breached various aspects of a long-term agreement term sheet. In its fourth amended complaint, International seeks a declaration from the court that the term sheet constitutes a legally binding contract for the sale of heavy-duty engines at specified prices through the end of 2006, alleges that Caterpillar breached the term sheet by raising certain prices effective October 1, 2002, and also alleges that Caterpillar breached an obligation to negotiate a comprehensive long-term agreement referenced in the term sheet. International further claims that Caterpillar improperly restricted the supply of heavy-duty engines to Internati onal from June through September 2002, and claims that Caterpillar made certain fraudulent misrepresentations with respect to the availability of engines during this time period. International seeks damages "in an amount to be determined at trial" and injunctive relief. Caterpillar filed an answer denying International's claims and has filed a counterclaim seeking a declaration that the term sheet has been effectively terminated. Caterpillar denies International's claims and will vigorously contest them. On September 24, 2003, the Appellate Court of Illinois, ruling on an interlocutory appeal, issued an order consistent with Caterpillar's position that, even if the court subsequently determines that the term sheet is a binding contract, it is indefinite in duration and was therefore terminable at will by Caterpillar after a reasonable period. Caterpillar anticipates that a trial currently scheduled to begin in the first quarter of 2005 will address all remaining issues in this matter. This matter is not related to the breach of contract action brought by Caterpillar against Navistar currently pending in the Circuit Court of Peoria County, Illinois.
The EU is imposing retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. origin goods as a result of a WTO decision that found the extraterritorial income exclusion (ETI) provisions of the FSC Repeal and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act of 2000 constituted a prohibited export subsidy. These tariffs, which began in March of 2004 at 5 percent, have increased 1 percentage point per month and would increase to 17 percent after one year. Given the makeup of the final retaliation list, some Caterpillar parts and components are subject to these tariffs. We do not believe these tariffs will materially impact our fi nancial results. The company has production facilities in the EU, Russia, Asia, and South America. Products sold into the EU from these plants are not affected by this retaliatory tariff. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (Act), enacted on October 22, 2004, phases-out the ETI provisions. As a result, the EU announced that it plans to end the retaliatory sanctions pending the outcome of a WTO review to determine whether certain provisions of the Act are compliant with the ruling against the FSC/ETI regime. The sanctions are not expected to be lifted officially until January 1, 2005.
Page 30
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 COMPARED WITH NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
SALES AND REVENUES
The chart above graphically illustrates reasons for the change in Consolidated Sales and Revenues between 2003 (at left) and 2004 (at right). Items favorably impacting sales and revenues appear as upward stair steps with the corresponding dollar amounts above each bar. Caterpillar management utilizes these charts internally to visually communicate with its Board and employees. |
Sales and revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $21.68 billion, $5.38 billion or 33 percent higher than the first nine months of 2003. The increase was due to higher Machinery and Engines volume of $4.51 billion, the favorable impact of currency on sales of $394 million due primarily to the strengthening euro, improved price realization of $341 million, and higher Financial Products revenues of $142 million.
Sales and Revenues (Millions of dollars) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | North America | EAME | Latin America | Asia/ Pacific | ||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Machinery | $ | 13,687 | $ | 7,554 | $ | 3,232 | $ | 1,063 | $ | 1,838 | ||||||||||
Engines* | 6,590 | 2,971 | 2,039 | 586 | 994 | |||||||||||||||
Financial Products** | 1,403 | 986 | 243 | 85 | 89 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 21,680 | $ | 11,511 | $ | 5,514 | $ | 1,734 | $ | 2,921 | |||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Machinery | $ | 9,851 | $ | 5,222 | $ | 2,657 | $ | 637 | $ | 1,335 | ||||||||||
Engines* | 5,186 | 2,346 | 1,653 | 493 | 694 | |||||||||||||||
Financial Products** | 1,261 | 906 | 224 | 71 | 60 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 16,298 | $ | 8,474 | $ | 4,534 | $ | 1,201 | $ | 2,089 | |||||||||||
* Does not include internal engine transfers of $1,261 million and $996 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. Internal engine transfers are valued at prices comparable to those for unrelated parties. | ||||||||||||||||||||
** Does not include revenues earned from Machinery and Engines of $138 million and $133 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Refer to table on page 34 for reconciliation of Machinery and Engine Sales by Geographic Region to External Sales by Marketing Segment. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Page 31
Machinery sales were $13.69 billion, 39 percent or $3.84 billion higher than 2003. Sales volume increased 34 percent, improved price realization accounted for about 3 percent and the favorable impact of currency added the remaining 2 percent. Most of the volume gain resulted from a 27 percent increase in dealer deliveries to end users. Strength was widespread, with deliveries up in all regions and into nearly all industries. Volume also benefited from an increase in dealer inventories required to support higher deliveries. Despite that increase, dealer inventories relative to deliveries were about a half month lower than a year earlier. In North America, sales increased 45 percent from 2003, 41 percent due to higher volume and the remainde r due to improved price realization. The volume gain came from a 35 percent increase in dealer deliveries and a similar increase in dealer inventories. Deliveries into construction benefited from low interest rates and good corporate cash flows. Mining deliveries increased 70 percent due to higher prices of both coal and metals. Sales in EAME increased 22 percent, with volume contributing about 16 percent and the remainder due mostly to the favorable currency impact of a stronger euro. The increase in volume was split between Europe, where construction showed some signs of recovery, and Africa/Middle East, where higher metals and energy prices led to higher deliveries into mining and construction. In Latin America, sales surged 67 percent above 2003 sales, about 60 percent due to higher volume and the remainder due mostly to improve d price realization. Volume increased because of a 62 percent increase in dealer deliveries and the growth in inventories required to support higher delivery rates. Higher metals and coal prices contributed to a doubling of deliveries into mining and faster economic growth in many countries boosted deliveries into construction. Sales in Asia/Pacific increased 38 percent, about 31 percent due to volume, 4 percent due to currency and the remainder due to price realization. Most of the volume increase occurred in Australia and Indonesia, where deliveries into mining boomed. The Chinese government’s administrative actions to slow inflation caused deliveries into that country to decline.
Engines sales were $6.59 billion, an increase of $1.40 billion or 27 percent from 2003. Sales volume was up about 23 percent, the favorable impact of currency accounted for about 3 percent and improved price realization added about 1 percent.
Engine sales increased in all regions. The North America engine sales gain of 27 percent was heavily impacted by a 46 percent increase in sales of on-highway truck engines, as improved industry health drove a continuation of fleet expansion and replacement. Sales of engines to the electric power sector increased 33 percent compared to year-to-date 2003, benefiting from increased focus on high quality power for communication and data systems as well as growth in non-residential construction. Sales of engines to the industrial sector rose 54 percent, with increases in demand for nearly all types of industrial OEM products and increased preference for Caterpillar engines. Sales of engines to the marine sector increased 19 percent due to continued demand for pleasure craft engines. Sales of petroleum engines decreased 11 percent as sales of turbines and turbine services decreased with the completion of various pipeline build cycles, partially offset by strong demand for reciprocating engines for gas compression and maximization of well production. Engine sales rose 23 percent in EAME with strong increases in most sectors. Sales of engines into the electric power sector increased 39 percent due to stronger demand for prime and cogeneration systems, as well as Middle Eastern demand for large engines and power modules. Sales of engines to the petroleum sector increased 43 percent, due primarily to increased sales of turbines and turbine-related services to support increases in petroleum investment. Engine sales in Latin America increased 19 percent, with increases in most sectors due to economic strengthening and reinstatement of investment activity that was delayed during 2003. Widespread economic growth in Asia/Pacific contributed to the 43 percent engine sales increase. Sales of engines into the electric power sector more than doubled with gains in large prime and continuous power installations, rental fleet investments, and sales to support ongoing demand in China driven by transmission constraints. Sales of petroleum engines increased 14 percent as exploration and production increased in China, Indonesia and other areas. Marine engines sales increased 28 percent due to increased demand for oceangoing vessels, dredge equipment in support of construction growth, as well as offshore supply boats and pleasure craft.
Financial Products revenueswere $1.40 billion, an increase of $142 million or 11 percent from the first nine months of 2003. The increase was due primarily to the favorable impact of $163 million from continued growth of Earning Assets, partially offset by a $62 million impact of lower interest rates on new and existing finance receivables at Cat Financial. Also, there was a $20 million increase in electric plant revenue at Cat Power Ventures and a $15 million increase in earned premiums at Cat Insurance.
Page 32
OPERATING PROFIT
The chart above graphically illustrates reasons for the change in Consolidated Operating Profit between 2003 (at left) and 2004 (at right). Items favorably impacting operating profit appear as upward stair steps with the corresponding dollar amounts above each bar, while items negatively impacting operating profit appear as downward stair steps with dollar amounts reflected in parentheses above each bar. Caterpillar management utilizes these charts internally to visually communicate with its Board and employees. |
Higher sales volume in all regions resulted in a favorable operating profit impact of $1.30 billion. Operating profit was also favorably impacted by improved price realization of $341 million, the absence of $132 million of Non-Conformance Penalties (NCPs) that were recorded in 2003 and improved profitability at Financial Products of $74 million.
Partially offsetting the favorable items were $702 million in higher core operating costs, a $186 million unfavorable impact of currency on operating profit due primarily to the weakening of the dollar compared with the British pound and the Japanese yen and $94 million of higher Retirement Benefits.
Our main focus has been meeting unprecedented customer demand and satisfying our customers in the first nine months of 2004, despite incurring additional core operating costs to respond to the steep market upturn. The additional core operating costs reflect increases in manufacturing costs to satisfy customer requirements and higher general support costs to meet demand. These additional manufacturing costs included higher material costs resulting from steel surcharges and commodity price increases and higher freight and expediting costs to ensure timely delivery of material. Manufacturing inefficiencies due to the steep ramp up of production and premiums due to supplier capacity constraints also contributed to this increase in manufacturing costs. The remainder of the core operating cost increase is largely attri butable to planned spending on product development and general support programs, higher incentive compensation costs due to our increased outlook as well as increased warranty expense. These unfavorable items were partially offset by ongoing cost reductions resulting from hundreds of 6 Sigma projects.
Page 33
Operating Profit (Loss) (Millions of Dollars) | |||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||
Machinery1 | $ | 1,441 | $ | 879 | |||
Engines1 | 351 | 118 | |||||
Financial Products | 332 | 258 | |||||
Consolidating Adjustments2 | (87 | ) | (66 | ) | |||
$ | 2,037 | $ | 1,189 | ||||
1Caterpillar operations are highly integrated; therefore, the company uses a number of allocations to determine lines of business operating profit for Machinery and Engines. | |||||||
2Consolidating adjustments consist of eliminations of transactions between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products. | |||||||
Machinery operating profit of $1.44 billion was up $562 million, or 64 percent, from the first nine months of 2003. The favorable impact of higher sales volume and improved price realization was partially offset by higher core operating costs (as outlined above), the unfavorable impact of currency and higher retirement benefits.
Engines operating profit of $351 million was up $233 million, or 197 percent, from the first nine months of 2003. The favorable impact of higher sales volume, the absence of NCPs and improved price realization were partially offset by higher core operating costs (as outlined above), higher retirement benefits and the unfavorable impact of currency.
Financial Products operating profitof $332 million was up $74 million, or 29 percent, from the first nine months of 2003.The increase was primarily due to a $67 million impact from the growth of earning assets and an $11 million improvement in gain/loss on sale of used equipment at Cat Financial and a $33 million increase in underwriting income at Cat Insurance. These favorable items were partially offset by a $32 million increase in o perating expenses at Cat Financial primarily related to increased labor costs and investment in technology to support growth in earning assets and a $16 million impact of lower interest rates.
Reconciliation of Machinery and Engine Sales by Geographic Region to External Sales by Marketing Segment | |||||||
Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||
(Millions of Dollars) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||
North American Geographic Region | $ | 10,525 | $ | 7,568 | |||
Engine sales included in the Power Products segment | (2,971 | ) | (2,346 | ) | |||
Company owned dealer sales included in the All Other segment | (393 | ) | (264 | ) | |||
Other* | (439 | ) | (136 | ) | |||
North American Marketing external sales | $ | 6,722 | $ | 4,822 | |||
EAME Geographic Region | $ | 5,271 | $ | 4,310 | |||
Power Products sales not included in the EAME Marketing segment | (1,987 | ) | (1,345 | ) | |||
Other* | (441 | ) | (616 | ) | |||
EAME Marketing external sales | $ | 2,843 | $ | 2,349 | |||
Latin America Geographic Region | $ | 1,649 | $ | 1,130 | |||
Power Products sales not included in the Latin America Marketing segment | (570 | ) | (421 | ) | |||
Other* | 186 | 99 | |||||
Latin America Marketing external sales | $ | 1,265 | $ | 808 | |||
Asia/Pacific Geographic Region | $ | 2,832 | $ | 2,029 | |||
Power Products sales not included in the Asia/Pacific Marketing segment | (683 | ) | (692 | ) | |||
Other* | (565 | ) | (203 | ) | |||
Asia/Pacific Marketing external sales | $ | 1,584 | $ | 1,134 | |||
| |||||||
* Represents primarily external sales of the Construction and Mining Products and the All Other segments. | |||||||
Page 34
OTHER PROFIT/LOSS ITEMS
Other income/expensewasincome of $135 million compared with income of $15 million in 2003 for a favorable impact of $120 million. The favorable change was primarily due to the absence of a $55 million non-recurring bond retirement charge recorded in the third quarter 2003, the favorable impact of Machinery and Engines currency gains of $48 million and the absence of investment impairments at Cat Insurance of $27 million. Partially offsetting these favorable items was a lower gain onSecuritized Finance Receivables at Cat Financial ($13 million gain in 2004 compared with $22 million gain in 2003).
Caterpillar’s profit and cash flows are subject to fluctuation due to changes in foreign exchange rates. The company uses currency forward and option contracts to reduce the impact of exchange rate changes. The result of this activity in 2004 on Machinery and Engines other income/expense was favorable $48 million. This reduced the net unfavorable impact of currency on profit before tax to $138 million compared to 2003.
The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 reflects an estimated annual tax rate of 27.5 percent. We are anticipating a 27.5 percent rate for the full year compared to 27 percent in 2003 primarily due to a change in our geographic mix of profits, partially offset by the change in retirement benefits discussed on page 42.
The equity in profit/loss of unconsolidated affiliated companies favorably impacted profit by$26 million over 2003, primarily driven by increased profitability at Shin Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd. Approximately one-third of the improvement was due to a gain on the sale of land.
SALES AND REVENUES OUTLOOK
We project company sales and revenues will increase about 30 percent in 2004. Machinery and Engines volume is expected to increase about 25 percent, the favorable impact of currency is expected to contribute about 2 percent and the remainder will come from improved price realization and Financial Products revenues.
Central Bankers have discussed moving to neutral interest rates, but we expect such moves will be cautious and limited. There is no urgent problem to address - inflation is generally close to Central Bank targets, and both moderate economic growth and surplus labor will keep inflation low. Continued low interest rates should support recoveries in business investment and allow the world economy to grow more than 4 percent this year.
In most countries, industrial production is growing faster than the overall economy, raising demand for raw materials. Production of many commodities has not kept up with demand and inventories are depleted. As a result, we expect coal and metals prices to remain relatively high for the rest of this year, prolonging the mining recovery.
Demand for oil is increasing at the fastest rate in years, and production increased more than 5 percent in the first half. That growth has utilized nearly all of the world’s productive capacity, and fears of a supply disruption have boosted prices sharply, creating concerns about the world economy. So long as it is demand and not supply disruptions causing higher prices, most economies should be able to manage. High prices are also benefiting the oil producing countries, which have been increasing construction spending.
North America (United States and Canada)
Data revisions to second quarter economic growth plus signs of much stronger consumer spending in the third quarter helped relieve recent concerns about the U. S. economy. Overall economic growth this year should be more than 4 percent, and the manufacturing sector should grow even faster. Canada’s economy improved in response to recent interest rate cuts and should grow about 3 percent this year.
The Fed raised interest rates three times since June 30, 2004, and we believe at least one more increase is likely this year. Despite those increases, interest rates do not threaten construction. Mortgage interest rates actually declined, which, along with a near-record backlog of building permits issued but not used, should insure robust housing construction for the rest of this year. Non-residential construction has just started a recovery from a severe slump; near-record corporate profits and rising demand should keep this sector growing rapidly.
The recovery in coal mining accelerated in the third quarter, and metals mining production has started to recover. Much higher prices should persist, keeping these sectors strong. We estimate that Machinery and Engines sales will increase about 45 percent in 2004.
Page 35
EAME
Euro-zone economies remain sluggish, with exports accounting for much of the growth. Slow growth and an absence of a severe inflation problem should keep interest rates on hold for the rest of the year. Other European countries, especially in Central Europe, will continue somewhat stronger recoveries. Overall European growth should average 2 percent for the year, which, along with low interest rates, should boost construction spending.
Both Africa/Middle East (AME) and the CIS are benefiting from the commodity boom; we expect economic growth to approach 5 percent in AME and 7 percent in the CIS. Increased incomes, resulting from higher commodity production and prices, should allow many countries to fund more construction. We estimate that Machinery and Engines sales in EAME should rise about 15 percent in 2004.
Latin America
Latin American countries significantly reduced inflation the past few years, which is leading to lower interest rates and increased investment inflows. We expect economic growth of more than 4.5 percent this year - the best since 2000. Low interest rates and an improving economy should further boost construction, and favorable energy and metals prices likely will support further investments in those sectors. As a result, we project that sales of Machinery and Engines should be up about 30 percent in 2004.
Asia/Pacific
We expect the Chinese government to continue curbs on selected development projects for the rest of the year. While these actions have notslowed overall economic growth much, they have contributed to a sharp decline in construction machinery deliveries. That decline, partially offset by deliveries of engines to support electric power and petroleum exploration and production, is expected to continue for the rest of this year.
Fortunately, prospects in the rest of the region are more favorable, particularly in Indonesia and Australia. Both countries have large mining sectors, which are booming in response to higher prices. In other countries, low interest rates and big gains in exports are supporting further increases in construction. Overall, we expect sales of Machinery and Engines to increase around 15 percent in 2004.
Financial Products
We expect continued growth in Financial Products for the remainder of 2004, with full-year revenues expected to increase approximately 11 percent versus 2003 primarily due to higher average earning assets in 2004.
PROFIT OUTLOOK
We expect profit per share to be up 80 to 85 percent from 2003 despite continued pressure on core operating costs associated with supporting higher than anticipated volumes, increased product development costs as we invest in our future and increased retirement benefits of about $125 million. Our outlook factors in continued improvement in price realization and uninterrupted production at our facilities worldwide.
PRELIMINARY 2005 SALES AND REVENUES OUTLOOK
Factors that benefited sales this year should largely continue in 2005. We expect most Central Banks to raise interest rates further but with a goal of keeping economic growth near trend levels. World economic growth should slow from more than 4 percent in 2004 to slightly above 3.5 percent. Sectors important to our sales should fare better. Industrial production will continue growing faster than the overall economy, keeping pressure on commodity prices and prolonging the recovery in mining. Construction spending will benefit from low interest rates, good business profits and a backlog of work deferred in the past.
We expect the world machinery industry to increase 3 to 8 percent in 2005, down from about 15 percent growth this year. The industry is likely to show little growth in Asia/Pacific due to continuing weakness in China. Machinery industries in other regions are expected to increase 5 to 10 percent. The world engine industry, benefiting from another strong year in the truck and bus sector, should be up 10 to 13 percent. Financial Products revenues are expected to be up about 15 percent in 2005. As a result, our preliminary outlook for 2005 company sales and revenues is about a 10 percent increase over 2004.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
We are providing supplemental information including deliveries to users and dealer inventory levels. We sell the majority of our machines and engines to independently owned and operated dealers and OEMs to meet the demands of their customers, the end users. Due to time lags between our sales and the deliveries to end users we believe this information will help readers better understand our business and the industries we serve. All information provided in the supplemental section is calculated inConstant Dollars.
Page 36
Dealer New Machine Deliveries
Worldwide dealer deliveries of new machines to end users increased 23 percent from third quarter 2003 and were a record for a third quarter. The seasonal decline in deliveries that historically has occurred between the second and third quarters was less than normal, another indication of the strength in deliveries. Deliveries into coal and metals mining doubled this year, a reflection of much higher prices and efforts to increase output. Continued strong housing construction and recoveries in business investment boosted deliveries into construction and construction-related activities.
Dealers inNorth America had a record third quarter, delivering 32 percent more machines than last year. Higher metals and coal prices, plus a favorable investment environment, led to increased deliveries into all major industries. Deliveries to rental fleets increased slightly faster than deliveries to end users.
Deliveries into North American coal mining nearly tripled and those into metals mining more than tripled compared to the third quarter last year. The Appalachian spot coal price rose over 80 percent in the third quarter, and the recovery in coal output accelerated. Higher metals prices, ranging from 10 to 80 percent higher than in third quarter 2003, and a recovery in production caused the increase in deliveries into metals mining. Dealer deliveries into general construction were up 31 percent from last year. Lower mortgage interest rates and increased personal incomes boosted housing starts and nonresidential construction completed a second quarter of recovery. Near-record corporate profits encouraged businesses to rebuild capacity hit by a 24 percent decline in investment since 2000. Dealer deliveries into heavy construction w ere up 27 percent compared to the third quarter last year. Contributing to that gain were increases in highway construction, site development and sewer and water construction. Highway construction benefited from past increases in Federal highway funding and both site development and sewer and water construction increased due to more residential and commercial development. Increases in residential and other construction led to both higher production and prices for quarry products and aggregates; dealer deliveries into that industry rose 20 percent. Much higher lumber prices, the result of increased housing construction, contributed to a 14 percent increase in dealer deliveries into forestry over third quarter 2003.
In EAME, dealer deliveries of new machines were 4 percent lower than in the third quarter of 2003, partly because deliveries last year benefited from a large mining project in the CIS. Shipments to dealers increased sharply in the last month of the quarter, temporarily causing a large increase in dealer inventories because dealers did not have enough time to fully convert those shipments into deliveries.
Latin American dealers, having their best quarter since early 1998, delivered 64 percent more new machines than in third quarter 2003. Higher prices for mine products, as well as increased production, resulted in much higher deliveries into mining. Low interest rates, more investment inflows and increased exports have initiated recoveries in most economies. As a result, deliveries into construction and construction-related activities increased.
Dealers in Asia/Pacific delivered 23 percent more machines to end users than in the third quarter last year. Deliveries into China fell well below last year as a result of government actions to limit some development projects. However, this decline was more than offset by large gains in Australia and Indonesia. In both those countries, deliveries into mining increased in response to better output prices.
Dealer Inventories of New Machines
Worldwide dealer inventories at the end of third quarter 2004 were higher than a year earlier in all regions. These increases reflect dealer efforts to accommodate stronger demand, requiring a larger volume of machines in transit to dealers or in preparation for customer delivery. Overall, dealer inventories relative to deliveries were lower than a year earlier in all regions and, on a worldwide basis, were almost a half month lower than one year ago.
Engine Deliveries to End Users and OEMs
In North America, engine deliveries to end users and OEMs were up 25 percent from third quarter 2003. Engine deliveries into the on-highway truck, industrial and petroleum sectors increased, more than offsetting decreases to the marine and electric power sectors. Engines delivered to North American truck and bus manufacturers rose 42 percent over the third quarter of 2003, driven by growing industry expansion and replacement purchases. Engine deliveries to end users and OEMs in the industrial sector increased 40 percent compared to the third quarter last year from stronger industry demand driven by high levels of business investment. Third quarter deliveries of engines into the petroleum sector rose 7 percent over last year as gas compression and workover rig sales experienced increased deliveries. Deliveries of engines into the electric power sector decreased 7 percent in the third quarter versus 2003. Third quarter deliveries of engines to the marine sector decreased 16 percent compared to a year ago due to low levels of workboat investment, partially offset by growth in deliveries to the pleasure craft market.
Page 37
In EAME, overall engine deliveries to end users and OEMs rose 33 percent over last year’s third quarter with increases to all sectors. Electric Power deliveries rose 44 percent over the third quarter of 2003, benefiting from increased sales against euro-based competitors and increased demand for combined heat and power self generation. Third-quarter petroleum deliveries rose 39 percent over a year ago, supported by increased investments from higher energy prices. Deliveries into the marine sector rose 39 percent, while industrial deliveries increased by 12 percent compared to the third quarter of 2003.
Deliveries to end users and OEMs in Latin America decreased 27 percent compared to third quarter 2003. The year over year reduction was primarily influenced by the absence of a large turbine electric power project sold during third quarter 2003.
Deliveries to end users and OEMs in Asia/Pacific were up 49 percent compared to third quarter 2003. Engine deliveries into the petroleum sector nearly doubled driven by increases in exploration and production in China, Indonesia and other areas. Asia/Pacific deliveries of generator sets were up 44 percent over third quarter 2003 from continued strong economic growth and regional transmission shortages. Deliveries into the marine sector increased as competitive shipyard rates drove demand for ocean-going vessels, and deliveries increased for Taiwan-based pleasure craft manufacturers.
Dealer Inventories of Engines
Worldwide dealer engine inventories at the end of the third quarter were approximately 25 percent above last year, slightly below selling rate increases and were at normal levels compared to selling rates. North America inventory remained constant relative to selling rates. Asia/Pacific dealer inventories increased slightly faster than selling rates, primarily due to some delays in China electric power demand. EAME dealer inventories increased slightly less than selling rates due to strong demand for electric power and petroleum products driven by sustained higher energy prices.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
1. Consolidating Adjustments - Eliminations of transactions between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products.
2. Constant Dollars- The dollar value of machine and engine deliveries adjusted for changes in price and currency.
3. Core Operating Costs - Machinery and Engines operating cost change adjusted for volume. It excludes the impact of currency, Non-Conformance Penalties and retirement benefits.
4. Currency - With respect to sales and revenues, currency represents the translation impact on sales resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar. With respect to operating profit, currency represents the net translation impact on sales and operating costs resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar. With respect to profit before tax, currency represents the net translation impact on sales, operating costs and other income/expense resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar. Also included in the currency impact on profit before tax is the effect ofcurrency forward and option contracts entered into by the company to reduce the risk of fluctuations in exchange rates.Currency includes the impacts on sales and operating profit for the Machinery and Engines lines of business only; currency impacts on the Financial Products line of business are included in the Financial Products portions of the respective analyses.
5. EAME - Geographic region including Europe, Africa, the Middle East and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).
6. Earning Assets - These assets consist primarily of total net finance receivables plus equipment on operating leases, less accumulated depreciation at Cat Financial. Net finance receivables represent the gross receivables amount less unearned income and the allowance for credit losses.
7. Engines- A principal line of business including the design, manufacture and marketing of engines for Caterpillar machinery, electric power generation systems; on-highway vehicles and locomotives; marine, petroleum, construction, industrial, agricultural and other applications; and related parts. Reciprocating engines meet power needs ranging from 5 to over 22,000 horsepower (4 to over 16 200 kilowatts). Turbines range from 1,600 to 19,500 horsepower (1 000 to 14 500 kilowatts).
8. Financial Products - A principal line of business consisting primarily of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (Cat Financial), Caterpillar Insurance Holdings, Inc. (Cat Insurance), Caterpillar Power Ventures Corporation (Cat Power Ventures) and their subsidiaries. Cat Financial provides a wide range of financing alternatives for Caterpillar machinery and engines, Solar gas turbines, as well as other equipment and marine vessels. Cat Financial also extends loans to customers and dealers. Cat Insurance provides various forms of insurance to customers and dealers to help support the purchase and lease of our equip ment. Cat Power Ventures is an active investor in independent power projects using Caterpillar power generation equipment and services.
Page 38
9. Latin America - Geographic region including the Central and South American countries and Mexico.
10. Machinery - A principal line of business which includes the design, manufacture and marketing of construction, mining and forestry machinery - track and wheel tractors, track and wheel loaders, pipelayers, motor graders, wheel tractor-scrapers, track and wheel excavators, backhoe loaders, mining shovels, log skidders, log loaders, off-highway trucks, articulated trucks, paving products, telescopic handlers, skid steer loaders and related parts. Also includes logistics services for other companies.
11. Machinery and Engines- Due to the highly integrated nature of operations, represents the aggregate total of the Machinery and Engines lines of business and includes primarily our manufacturing, marketing and parts distribution operations.
12. Non-Conformance Penalties (NCPs) - Pursuant to a consent decree Caterpillar and other engine manufacturers entered into with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the company was required to meet certain emission standards by October 2002 for engines manufactured for on-highway use. Under the consent decree, an engine manufacturer was required to pay a non-conformance penalty (NCP) to the EPA for each engine manufactured after October 1, 2002 that did not meet the standards. The amount of the NCP was based on how close to meeting the standards the engine came - the more the engine was out of compliance, the higher the penalty per engine.
13. Price Realization - The impact of net price changes excluding currency.
14. Retirement Benefits- Cost of defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution plans and retirement healthcare and life insurance.
15. Sales Volume - With respect to sales and revenues, sales volume represents the impact of changes in the quantities sold for machines, engines and parts. With respect to operating profit, sales volume represents the impact of changes in the quantities sold for machines, engines and parts combined with the net operating profit impact of changes in the relative weighting of machines, engines and parts sales with respect to total sales.
16. Securitized Finance Receivables - Cat Financial sells retail installment sale contracts and finance leases into public asset-backed securitization facilities. Gains/losses on the securitization of finance receivables represent the difference between the carrying value and fair value of the receivables.
17. 6 Sigma - On a technical level, 6 Sigma represents a measure of variation that achieves 3.4 defects per million opportunities. At Caterpillar, 6 Sigma represents a much broader cultural philosophy to drive continuous improvement throughout the value chain. It is a fact-based, data-driven methodology that we are using to improve processes, enhance quality, cut costs, grow our business and deliver greater value to our customers through Black Belt-led project teams. At Caterpillar, 6 Sigma goes beyond mere process improvement; it has become the way we work as teams to process business information, solve problems a nd manage our business successfully.
C.Liquidity & Capital Resources
Sources of funds
We generate our capital resources primarily through operations. Consolidated operating cash flow was $1.54 billion through the third quarter of 2004, compared with $1.41 billion through the third quarter of 2003. The increase is primarily the result of higher profitability in 2004 as compared to 2003, largely offset by an increase in working capital requirements. We anticipate that the majority of future capital resource requirements will be funded by operating cash flow, which is largely sourced from profits. See our Outlook on page 35.
Total debt as of September 30, 2004 was $22.3 billion, an increase of $2.5 billion from year-end 2003. Debt related to Machinery and Engines increased $513 million, as cash used for capital expenditures, the stock repurchase program, payment of dividends, and acquisitions more than offset cash provided by operations.
Page 39
Debt related to Financial Products increased $1.9 billion due to growth at Cat Financial. We have two global credit facilities with a syndicate of banks totaling $5.0 billion available in the aggregate to both Machinery and Engines and Financial Products to support commercial paper programs. Based on management’s allocation decision, which can be revised at any time, the portion of the facility available to Cat Financial at September 30, 2004 was $4.4 billion. The five-year facility of $2.5 billion expires in September 2009. The 364-day facility of $2.5 billion expires in September 2005. The facility expiring in September 2005 has a provision that allows Caterpillar or Cat Financial to obtain a one-year loan in September 2005 that would mature in September 2006. Our total credit commitments as of September 30, 2004 were:
(Millions of dollars) | ||||||||||||
Machinery | Financial | |||||||||||
Consolidated | and Engines | Products | ||||||||||
Credit lines available: | ||||||||||||
Global credit facility | $ | 5,000 | $ | 600 | $ | 4,400 | ||||||
Other external | 2,133 | 927 | 1,206 | |||||||||
Total credit lines available | 7,133 | 1,527 | 5,606 | |||||||||
Less: Global credit facility supporting commercial paper | 4,419 | 550 | 3,869 | |||||||||
Less: Utilized credit | 404 | 87 | 317 | |||||||||
Available credit | $ | 2,310 | $ | 890 | $ | 1,420 | ||||||
We also generate funding through the securitization of receivables. Through the third quarter of 2004, we generated $787 million of capital resources from the securitization of trade receivables and $659 million from the securitization of finance receivables. During the second and third quarters of 2004, Cat Financial sold retail finance leases and installment sale contracts through syndications where the investors have no recourse to Cat Financial. Proceeds of $8 million were recognized from the sale of such contracts.
We do not generate material funding through structured finance transactions.
Machinery and Engines
Operating cash flow was $758 million through the third quarter 2004, compared with $787 million for the same period a year ago. Although profit was up significantly through the first three quarters of 2004, this increase was more than offset by an increase in inventory to support higher sales volume. The surge in volume has also resulted in key component shortages, which have resulted in delayed production driving additional inventory increases. The inventory growth was partially offset by an increase in accounts payable.
Pursuant to the share repurchase program authorized by the Board of Directors in October 2003, $400 million was spent to repurchase 5.3 million shares during the first three quarters of 2004. There were 341.2 million shares outstanding at the end of the third quarter 2004. The goal of the share repurchase program, which expires in October 2008, is to reduce the company’s outstanding shares to 320 million.
Capital expenditures, excluding equipment leased to others, during the first three quarters of 2004 were $460 million, an increase of $125 million from the same period a year ago to support growth and new product initiatives. Acquisitions resulted in a decrease to cash of $284 million primarily from the acquisitions of the MG Rover Ltd. parts distribution business and Williams Technologies, Inc.
Financial Products
Operating cash flow was $777 million through the third quarter 2004, compared with $603 million for the same period a year ago. The increase is primarily the result of an increase in profit in 2004 as compared to the same period a year ago. Cash used to purchase equipment leased to others was $825 million during the first three quarters of 2004 compared to $771 million for the first three quarters of 2003. In addition, net cash used for finance receivables was $2.0 billion for the first three quarters of 2004, compared to $729 million for the first three quarters of 2003 due to growth at Cat Financial.
Financial Products total borrowings were $18.29 billion at September 30, 2004, an increase of $1.9 billion from December 31, 2003 due to financing a higher amount of assets. Debt repayment in Financial Products depends primarily on timely repayment and collectibility of the receivables portfolio. At September 30, 2004, finance receivables past due over 30 days were 2.3 percent, compared with 2.5 percent at December 31, 2003. The allowance for credit losses was 1.42 percent of finance receivables, net of unearned income, at September 30, 2004, compared to 1.49 percent at December 31, 2003. Receivables written off due to uncollectibility, net of recoveries on receivables previously written off, were $47 million and $57 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, respectively.
Financial Products was in compliance with all debt covenants at September 30, 2004.
Page 40
D.Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts. The more significant estimates include: residual values for leased assets, fair market values for goodwill impairment tests, and reserves for warranty, product liability and insurance losses, postretirement benefits, post-sale discounts, credit losses and income taxes. Following are the methods and assumptions used in determining our estimates and indication of the risks inherent in each:
Residual values for leased assets -Determined based on the product, specifications, application and hours of usage. Each product has its own model for evaluation that includes market value cycles and forecasts. Consideration is also given to the number of assets that will be returned from lease during a given time frame. Residual values could decline due to economic factors, obsolescence or other adverse circumstances.
Fair market values for goodwill impairment tests -Determined for each reporting unit by discounting projected cash flow for five years and adding a year-five residual value based upon a market Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) multiple. The estimated fair value could be impacted by changes in interest rates, growth rates, costs, capital expenditures and market conditions.
Warranty reserve -Determined by applying historical claim rate experience to the current field population and dealer inventory. Effective in the third quarter 2004, we revised our process to utilize more detailed claim rates by product. This provides more comprehensive information for management. This change did not have a material impact on our financial statements. Warranty payments may differ from those estimated if actual claim rates are higher or lower than our historical rates.
Product liability and insurance loss reserves -Determined based upon reported claims in process of settlement and actuarial estimates for losses incurred but not reported. Loss reserves, including incurred but not reported reserves, are based on estimates, and ultimate settlements may vary significantly from such estimates due to increased claims frequency or severity over historical levels.
Postemployment benefits- Primary actuarial assumptions were determined as follows:
- The U.S. expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on our estimate of long-term passive returns for equities and fixed income securities weighted by the allocation of our plan assets. Based on historical performance, we increase the passive returns due to our active management of the plan assets. A similar process is used to determine this rate for our non-U.S. pension plans. This rate is impacted by changes in general market conditions, but because it represents a long-term rate, it is not significantly impacted by short-term market swings. Changes in our allocation of plan assets would also impact this rate. For example, a shift to more fixed income securities would lower the rate. A decrease in the rate would increase our expense.
- The assumed discount rate is used to discount future benefit obligations back to today's dollars. The U.S. discount rate is based on the Moody's Aa bond yield as of our measurement date, November 30. A similar process is used to determine the assumed discount rate for our non-U.S. plans. This rate is sensitive to changes in interest rates. A decrease in the discount rate would increase our obligation and future expense.
- The expected rate of compensation increase is used to develop benefit obligations using projected pay at retirement. It represents average long-term salary increases. This rate is influenced by our long-term compensation policies. An increase in the rate would increase our obligation and expense.
- The assumed health care trend rate represents the rate at which health care costs are assumed to increase and is based on historical and expected experience. Changes in our projections of future health care costs due to general economic conditions and those specific to health care (e.g. technology driven cost changes) will impact this trend rate. An increase in the trend rate would increase our obligation and expense.
Post-sale discount reserve- The company extends numerous merchandising programs that provide discounts to dealers as products are sold to end users. The reserve is determined based on historical data adjusted for known changes in merchandising programs. Discounts paid may differ from those estimated if actual program usage is higher or lower than our historical or expected rates.
Page 41
Credit loss reserve- The allowance for credit losses is evaluated on a regular basis and adjusted based upon management’s best estimate of probable losses inherent in our finance receivables. In estimating probable losses, we review accounts that are past due, non-performing, or in bankruptcy. We also review accounts that may be at risk using information available about the customer, such as financial statements, news reports, and published credit ratings. We also use general information regarding industry trends and the general economic environment. Using an estimate of current fair market value of collateral and factoring in credit enhancements, such as additional collateral and third party guarantees, we arrive at an estimated los s for specific accounts and estimate an additional amount for the remainder of the finance receivables based upon historical trends. Adverse economic conditions or other factors that might cause deterioration of the financial health of our customers could change the timing and level of payments received and thus necessitate a change in our estimated losses.
Income tax reserve- Despite our belief that our tax return positions are consistent with applicable tax law, we believe that certain positions are likely to be challenged by taxing authorities. Settlement of any challenge can result in no change, a complete disallowance, or some partial adjustment reached through negotiations or litigation. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax reserves. Our reserves are adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of our tax audits. Our income tax expense includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that we consider appropriate, as well as related interest. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue would require use of our cash. Favorable resolution would be recognized as a reduction to income tax expense at the time of resolution.
We have incorporated many years of data into the determination of each of these estimates and we have not historically experienced significant adjustments.
E.Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
We recognizedpension expense of $63 million and $204 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, as compared to $28 million and $100 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003.The increase in expense was primarily a result of the amortization of actuarial losses resulting from a declining discount rate and poor performance of the equity markets in 2002 and 2001. SFAS 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” requires companies to discount future benefi t obligations back to today’s dollars using a discount rate that is based on high-quality fixed-income investments. A decrease in the discount rate increases the pension benefit obligation. This increase is amortized into earnings as an actuarial loss. SFAS 87 also requires companies to use an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for computing current year pension expense. Differences between the actual and expected asset returns are amortized into earnings as actuarial gains and losses.
We recognized other postretirement benefit expense of $39 million and $193 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, as compared to $67 million and $202 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003. The decrease in expense is the result of recognition of anticipated benefits from the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (see further discussion of the Act below), partially offset by an increase in expense due to the amortization of actuarial losses resulting from a declining discount rate, higher than expected benefit costs, and an increase in expected health care inflation.
Our U.S. postretirement health care plans provide for prescription drug benefits. On December 8, 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act) was signed into law. The Act introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare (Medicare Part D) as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. In January 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 106-1 (FSP 106-1), Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. As permitted by FSP 106-1, we made a one-time election to defer accounting for the effects of the Act pending further guidance from the FASB.
In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 106-2 (FSP 106-2), which superseded FSP 106-1. FSP 106-2 provides accounting guidance to employers that have determined that prescription drug benefits available under their retiree health care benefit plans are at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. The FSP requires that the benefit attributable to past service be accounted for as an actuarial gain and the benefit related to current service be reported as a reduction in service cost.
We have determined that most of our U.S. retiree health care plans are at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D and will qualify for the federal subsidy. In the third quarter of 2004, we adopted FSP 106-2 retroactive to December 31, 2003 (the period end that includes the date of the Act’s enactment) as permitted by the FSP. The impact was a reduction in our accumulated postretirement benefit obligation of $284 million related to benefits attributed to past service. Because the federal subsidy is tax exempt, no tax was provided for the benefit in the provision for income taxes. This lowered our estimated annual tax rate approximately one-half of a percent. The reduction in the components of 2004 net periodic postretirement benefits expense was as follows:
Page 42
2004 | |||||||||||||||
First Quarter | Second Quarter | Third Quarter | Nine Months Ended Sept 30 | ||||||||||||
(Millions of dollars) | |||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 3 | |||||||
Interest cost | 3 | 5 | 5 | 13 | |||||||||||
Amortization of actuarial gain | 4 | 8 | 9 | 21 | |||||||||||
Total reduction in net periodic postretirement benefit cost | $ | 8 | $ | 14 | $ | 15 | $ | 37 | |||||||
At the end of 2003, unrecognized actuarial losses related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans were $3.20 billion and $1.38 billion, respectively. The unrecognized actuarial losses for both pensions and other postretirement benefits will be impacted in future periods by actual asset returns, actual health care inflation, discount rate changes and other factors that impact these expenses. These losses are currently being amortized into earnings on a straight-line basis over the remaining service period of active employees expected to receive benefits under the benefit plans.
SFAS 87 requires the recognition of an Additional Minimum Liability if the market value of plan assets is less than the accumulated benefit obligation as of the measurement date.Due to the continued decline in the discount rate, the funded status of our pension plans has declined during 2004. Based on quarter-end plan asset values, we would be required to increase the Additional Minimum Liability by approximately $1.9 billion at December 31, 2004. Included within this amount is an offset to the $1.0 billion prepaid asset for certain U.S. plans. This adjustment would result in a decrease in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (a component of Shareholders' Equity on the St atement of Financial Position) of approximately $1.2 billion after-tax. Final determination will only be known on the measurement date, which is November 30, 2004.
Although we have no ERISA funding requirements in 2004, on April 8, 2004, we made a voluntary cash contribution of $494 million to fund our U.S. pension plans.We also made contributions of approximately $90 million to certain non-U.S. pension plans during the first nine months of 2004, and anticipate additional contributions of approximately $20 million throughout the remainder of the year. The company has adequate liquidity resources to fund plans, as it deems necessary.
F.Supplemental Consolidating Data
We are providing supplemental consolidating data for the purpose of additional analysis. The data has been grouped as follows:
Consolidated - Caterpillar Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Machinery and Engines -The Machinery and Engines data contained in the schedules on pages 44 to 51 are “non-GAAP financial measures” as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission in Regulation G. These non-GAAP financial measures have no standardized meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP, and therefore, are unlikely to be comparable with the calculation of similar measures for other companies. Management does not intend these items to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the related GAAP measures. Caterpillar defines Machinery and Engines as it is presented in the supplemental data as Caterpillar Inc. and its subsidiaries with Financial Products accounted for on the equity basis. Machinery and Engines information r elates to the design, manufacture, marketing of our products. Financial Products information relates to the financing to customers and dealers for the purchase and lease of Caterpillar and other equipment. The nature of these businesses is different especially with regard to the financial position and cash flow items. Caterpillar management utilizes this presentation internally to highlight these differences. We also believe this presentation will assist readers in understanding our business.
Financial Products - our finance and insurance subsidiaries, primarily Cat Financial and Cat Insurance.
Consolidating Adjustments - eliminations of transactions between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products.
Pages 44 to 51 reconcile Machinery and Engines with Financial Products on the Equity Basis to Caterpillar Inc. Consolidated financial information.
Page 43
Caterpillar Inc. Supplemental Data for Results of Operations For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 (Unaudited) (Millions of dollars) | ||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Consolidating Data | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Machinery and Engines1 | Financial Products | Consolidating Adjustments | |||||||||||||
Sales and revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Sales of Machinery and Engines | $ | 7,175 | $ | 7,175 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Revenues of Financial Products | 474 | - | 426 | 48 | 2 | |||||||||||
Total sales and revenues | 7,649 | 7,175 | 426 | 48 | ||||||||||||
Operating costs: | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 5,728 | 5,728 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 734 | 622 | 27 | 85 | 3 | |||||||||||
Research and development expenses | 240 | 240 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Interest expense of Financial Products | 129 | - | 132 | (3 | )4 | |||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 140 | 2 | 138 | - | ||||||||||||
Total operating costs | 6,971 | 6,592 | 297 | 82 | ||||||||||||
Operating profit | 678 | 583 | 129 | (34 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest expense excluding Financial Products | 60 | 62 | - | (2 | )4 | |||||||||||
Other income (expense) | 45 | (2 | ) | 15 | 32 | 5 | ||||||||||
Consolidated profit before taxes | 663 | 519 | 144 | - | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 182 | 141 | 41 | - | ||||||||||||
Profit of consolidated companies | 481 | 378 | 103 | - | ||||||||||||
Equity in profit (loss) of unconsolidated affiliated companies | 17 | 17 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Equity in profit of Financial Products' subsidiaries | - | 103 | - | (103 | )6 | |||||||||||
Profit | $ | 498 | $ | 498 | $ | 103 | $ | (103 | ) | |||||||
1 Represents Caterpillar Inc. and its subsidiaries with Financial Products accounted for on the equity basis. | ||||||||||||||||
2 Elimination of Financial Products revenues earned from Machinery and Engines. | ||||||||||||||||
3 Elimination of expenses recorded by Machinery and Engines paid to Financial Products. | ||||||||||||||||
4 Elimination of interest expense recorded between Financial Products and Machinery and Engines. | ||||||||||||||||
5 Elimination of discount recorded by Machinery and Engines on receivables sold to Financial Products and of interest earned between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products. | ||||||||||||||||
6 Elimination of Financial Products profit due to equity method of accounting. | ||||||||||||||||
Page 44
Caterpillar Inc. Supplemental Data for Results of Operations For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 (Unaudited) (Millions of dollars) | |||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Consolidating Data | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Machinery and Engines1 | Financial Products | Consolidating Adjustments | ||||||||||||||
Sales and revenues: | |||||||||||||||||
Sales of Machinery and Engines | $ | 5,112 | $ | 5,112 | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||
Revenues of Financial Products | 433 | - | 479 | (46 | )2 | ||||||||||||
Total sales and revenues | 5,545 | 5,112 | 479 | (46 | ) | ||||||||||||
Operating costs: | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 4,143 | 4,143 | - | - | |||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 627 | 505 | 139 | (17 | )3 | ||||||||||||
Research and development expenses | 173 | 173 | - | - | |||||||||||||
Interest expense of Financial Products | 116 | - | 119 | (3 | )4 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 101 | (28 | ) | 129 | - | ||||||||||||
Total operating costs | 5,160 | 4,793 | 387 | (20 | ) | ||||||||||||
Operating profit | 385 | 319 | 92 | (26 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest expense excluding Financial Products | 61 | 70 | - | (9 | )4 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense) | (40 | ) | (68 | ) | 11 | 17 | 5 | ||||||||||
Consolidated profit before taxes | 284 | 181 | 103 | - | |||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 69 | 33 | 36 | - | |||||||||||||
Profit of consolidated companies | 215 | 148 | 67 | - | |||||||||||||
Equity in profit (loss) of unconsolidated affiliated companies | 7 | 5 | 2 | - | |||||||||||||
Equity in profit of Financial Products' subsidiaries | - | 69 | - | (69 | )6 | ||||||||||||
Profit | $ | 222 | $ | 222 | $ | 69 | $ | (69 | ) | ||||||||
1 Represents Caterpillar Inc. and its subsidiaries with Financial Products accounted for on the equity basis. | |||||||||||||||||
2 Elimination of Financial Products revenues earned from Machinery and Engines. | |||||||||||||||||
3 Elimination of expenses recorded by Machinery and Engines paid to Financial Products. | |||||||||||||||||
4 Elimination of interest expense recorded between Financial Products and Machinery and Engines. | |||||||||||||||||
5 Elimination of discount recorded by Machinery and Engines on receivables sold to Financial Products and of interest earned between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products. | |||||||||||||||||
6 Elimination of Financial Products profit due to equity method of accounting. | |||||||||||||||||
Page 45
Caterpillar Inc. Supplemental Data for Results of Operations For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 (Unaudited) (Millions of dollars) | ||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Consolidating Data | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Machinery and Engines1 | Financial Products | Consolidating Adjustments | |||||||||||||
Sales and revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Sales of Machinery and Engines | $ | 20,277 | $ | 20,277 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Revenues of Financial Products | 1,403 | - | 1,541 | (138 | )2 | |||||||||||
Total sales and revenues | 21,680 | 20,277 | 1,541 | (138 | ) | |||||||||||
Operating costs: | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 15,952 | 15,952 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 2,223 | 1,846 | 420 | (43 | )3 | |||||||||||
Research and development expenses | 685 | 685 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Interest expense of Financial Products | 367 | - | 375 | (8 | )4 | |||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 416 | 2 | 414 | - | ||||||||||||
Total operating costs | 19,643 | 18,485 | 1,209 | (51 | ) | |||||||||||
Operating profit | 2,037 | 1,792 | 332 | (87 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest expense excluding Financial Products | 176 | 180 | - | (4 | )4 | |||||||||||
Other income (expense) | 135 | 7 | 45 | 83 | 5 | |||||||||||
Consolidated profit before taxes | 1,996 | 1,619 | 377 | - | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 549 | 428 | 121 | - | ||||||||||||
Profit of consolidated companies | 1,447 | 1,191 | 256 | - | ||||||||||||
Equity in profit (loss) of unconsolidated affiliated companies | 37 | 35 | 2 | - | ||||||||||||
Equity in profit of Financial Products' subsidiaries | - | 258 | - | (258 | )6 | |||||||||||
Profit | $ | 1,484 | $ | 1,484 | $ | 258 | $ | (258 | ) | |||||||
1 Represents Caterpillar Inc. and its subsidiaries with Financial Products accounted for on the equity basis. | ||||||||||||||||
2 Elimination of Financial Products revenues earned from Machinery and Engines. | ||||||||||||||||
3 Elimination of expenses recorded by Machinery and Engines paid to Financial Products. | ||||||||||||||||
4 Elimination of interest expense recorded between Financial Products and Machinery and Engines. | ||||||||||||||||
5 Elimination of discount recorded by Machinery and Engines on receivables sold to Financial Products and of interest earned between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products. | ||||||||||||||||
6 Elimination of Financial Products profit due to equity method of accounting. | ||||||||||||||||
Page 46
Caterpillar Inc. Supplemental Data for Results of Operations For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 (Unaudited) (Millions of dollars) | ||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Consolidating Data | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Machinery and Engines1 | Financial Products | Consolidating Adjustments | |||||||||||||
Sales and revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Sales of Machinery and Engines | $ | 15,037 | $ | 15,037 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Revenues of Financial Products | 1,261 | - | 1,394 | (133 | )2 | |||||||||||
Total sales and revenues | 16,298 | 15,037 | 1,394 | (133 | ) | |||||||||||
Operating costs: | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 12,102 | 12,102 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 1,801 | 1,470 | 387 | (56 | )3 | |||||||||||
Research and development expenses | 494 | 494 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Interest expense of Financial Products | 354 | - | 365 | (11 | )4 | |||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 358 | (26 | ) | 384 | - | |||||||||||
Total operating costs | 15,109 | 14,040 | 1,136 | (67 | ) | |||||||||||
Operating profit | 1,189 | 997 | 258 | (66 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest expense excluding Financial Products | 192 | 201 | - | (9 | )4 | |||||||||||
Other income (expense) | 15 | (65 | ) | 23 | 57 | 5 | ||||||||||
Consolidated profit before taxes | 1,012 | 731 | 281 | - | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 273 | 174 | 99 | - | ||||||||||||
Profit of consolidated companies | 739 | 557 | 182 | - | ||||||||||||
Equity in profit (loss) of unconsolidated affiliated companies | 11 | 7 | 4 | - | ||||||||||||
Equity in profit of Financial Products' subsidiaries | - | 186 | - | (186 | )6 | |||||||||||
Profit�� | $ | 750 | $ | 750 | $ | 186 | $ | (186 | ) | |||||||
1 Represents Caterpillar Inc. and its subsidiaries with Financial Products accounted for on the equity basis. | ||||||||||||||||
2 Elimination of Financial Products revenues earned from Machinery and Engines. | ||||||||||||||||
3 Elimination of expenses recorded by Machinery and Engines paid to Financial Products. | ||||||||||||||||
4 Elimination of interest expense recorded between Financial Products and Machinery and Engines. | ||||||||||||||||
5 Elimination of discount recorded by Machinery and Engines on receivables sold to Financial Products and of interest earned between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products. | ||||||||||||||||
6 Elimination of Financial Products profit due to equity method of accounting. | ||||||||||||||||
Page 47
Caterpillar Inc. Supplemental Data for Financial Position At September 30, 2004 (Unaudited) (Millions of dollars) | |||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Consolidating Data | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Machinery and Engines1 | Financial Products | Consolidating Adjustments | ||||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||||
Current assets: | |||||||||||||||||
Cash and short-term investments | $ | 417 | $ | 241 | $ | 176 | $ | - | |||||||||
Receivables - trade and other | 3,790 | 2,838 | 1,505 | (553 | )2 | ||||||||||||
Receivables - finance | 8,951 | - | 8,951 | - | |||||||||||||
Deferred and refundable income taxes | 619 | 548 | 71 | - | |||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses | 1,350 | 1,335 | 14 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Inventories | 4,509 | 4,509 | - | - | |||||||||||||
Total current assets | 19,636 | 9,471 | 10,717 | (552 | ) | ||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment - net | 7,303 | 4,607 | 2,696 | - | |||||||||||||
Long-term receivables - trade and other | 268 | 262 | 41 | (35 | )2 | ||||||||||||
Long-term receivables - finance | 8,326 | - | 8,326 | - | |||||||||||||
Investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies | 839 | 466 | 374 | (1 | )10 | ||||||||||||
Investments in Financial Products subsidiaries | - | 2,809 | - | (2,809 | )4 | ||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 516 | 743 | 16 | (243 | )5 | ||||||||||||
Intangible assets | 361 | 353 | 8 | - | |||||||||||||
Goodwill | 1,450 | 1,450 | - | - | |||||||||||||
Other assets | 1,695 | 790 | 905 | - | |||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 40,394 | $ | 20,951 | $ | 23,083 | $ | (3,640 | ) | ||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 2,918 | 385 | 2,847 | (314 | )6 | ||||||||||||
Accounts payable | 3,934 | 3,683 | 185 | 66 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Accrued expenses | 1,793 | 992 | 807 | (6 | )8 | ||||||||||||
Accrued wages, salaries and employee benefits | 1,345 | 1,336 | 9 | - | |||||||||||||
Dividends payable | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||
Deferred and current income taxes payable | 235 | 128 | 107 | - | |||||||||||||
Deferred liability | - | - | 299 | (299 | )9 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt due within one year | 3,601 | 6 | 3,595 | - | |||||||||||||
Total current liabilities | 13,826 | 6,530 | 7,849 | (553 | ) | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt due after one year | 15,754 | 3,677 | 12,112 | (35 | )6 | ||||||||||||
Liability for postemployment benefits | 3,234 | 3,234 | - | - | |||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes and other liabilities | 559 | 489 | 313 | (243 | )5 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities | 33,373 | 13,930 | 20,274 | (831 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stockholders' equity | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock | 1,132 | 1,132 | 890 | (890 | )4 | ||||||||||||
Treasury stock | (3,238 | ) | (3,238 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||
Profit employed in the business | 9,667 | 9,667 | 1,753 | (1,753 | )4 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | (540 | ) | (540 | ) | 166 | (166 | )4 | ||||||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 7,021 | 7,021 | 2,809 | (2,809 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 40,394 | $ | 20,951 | $ | 23,083 | $ | (3,640 | ) | ||||||||
1 Represents Caterpillar Inc. and its subsidiaries with Financial Products accounted for on the equity basis. | |||||||||||||||||
2 Elimination of receivables between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products. | |||||||||||||||||
3 Elimination of Machinery and Engines insurance premiums which are prepaid to Financial Products. | |||||||||||||||||
4 Elimination of Financial Products equity which is accounted for on Machinery and Engines on the equity basis. | |||||||||||||||||
5 Reclassification of Financial Products deferred tax liability to a deferred tax asset on a consolidated basis. | |||||||||||||||||
6 Elimination of debt between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products. | |||||||||||||||||
7 Elimination of payables between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products. | |||||||||||||||||
8 Elimination of prepaid insurance in Financial Products' accrued expenses. | |||||||||||||||||
9 Elimination of Financial Products deferred liabilities with Machinery and Engines. | |||||||||||||||||
10 Elimination of Machinery and Engines investment in Financial Products subsidiary. | |||||||||||||||||
Page 48
Caterpillar Inc. Supplemental Data for Financial Position At December 31, 2003 (Unaudited) (Millions of dollars) | |||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Consolidating Data | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Machinery and Engines1 | Financial Products | Consolidating Adjustments | ||||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||||
Current assets: | |||||||||||||||||
Cash and short-term investments | $ | 342 | $ | 220 | $ | 122 | $ | - | |||||||||
Receivables - trade and other | 3,666 | 2,993 | 1,642 | (969 | )2 | ||||||||||||
Receivables - finance | 7,605 | - | 7,605 | - | |||||||||||||
Deferred and refundable income taxes | 707 | 645 | 62 | - | |||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses | 1,424 | 1,403 | 27 | (6 | )3 | ||||||||||||
Inventories | 3,047 | 3,047 | - | - | |||||||||||||
Total current assets | 16,791 | 8,308 | 9,458 | (975 | ) | ||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment - net | 7,290 | 4,682 | 2,608 | - | |||||||||||||
Long-term receivables - trade and other | 82 | 81 | 1 | - | |||||||||||||
Long-term receivables - finance | 7,822 | - | 7,822 | - | |||||||||||||
Investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies | 800 | 426 | 374 | - | |||||||||||||
Investments in Financial Products subsidiaries | - | 2,547 | - | (2,547 | )4 | ||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 616 | 819 | 19 | (222 | )5 | ||||||||||||
Intangible assets | 239 | 230 | 9 | - | |||||||||||||
Goodwill | 1,398 | 1,398 | - | - | |||||||||||||
Other assets | 1,427 | 719 | 708 | - | |||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 36,465 | $ | 19,210 | $ | 20,999 | $ | (3,744 | ) | ||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 2,757 | 72 | 3,160 | (475 | )6 | ||||||||||||
Accounts payable | 3,100 | 3,078 | 243 | (221 | )7 | ||||||||||||
Accrued expenses | 1,638 | 857 | 802 | (21 | )8 | ||||||||||||
Accrued wages, salaries and employee benefits | 1,802 | 1,788 | 14 | - | |||||||||||||
Dividends payable | 127 | 127 | - | - | |||||||||||||
Deferred and current income taxes payable | 216 | 166 | 50 | - | |||||||||||||
Deferred liability | - | - | 259 | (259 | )9 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt due within one year | 2,981 | 32 | 2,949 | - | |||||||||||||
Total current liabilities | 12,621 | 6,120 | 7,477 | (976 | ) | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt due after one year | 14,078 | 3,367 | 10,711 | - | |||||||||||||
Liability for postemployment benefits | 3,172 | 3,172 | - | - | |||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes and other liabilities | 516 | 473 | 264 | (221 | )5 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities | 30,387 | 13,132 | 18,452 | (1,197 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stockholders' equity | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock | 1,059 | 1,059 | 890 | (890 | )4 | ||||||||||||
Treasury stock | (2,914 | ) | (2,914 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||
Profit employed in the business | 8,450 | 8,450 | 1,495 | (1,495 | )4 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | (517 | ) | (517 | ) | 162 | (162 | )4 | ||||||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 6,078 | 6,078 | 2,547 | (2,547 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 36,465 | $ | 19,210 | $ | 20,999 | $ | (3,744 | ) | ||||||||
1 Represents Caterpillar Inc. and its subsidiaries with Financial Products accounted for on the equity basis. | |||||||||||||||||
2 Elimination of receivables between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products. | |||||||||||||||||
3 Elimination of Machinery and Engines insurance premiums which are prepaid to Financial Products. | |||||||||||||||||
4 Elimination of Financial Products equity which is accounted for on Machinery and Engines on the equity basis. | |||||||||||||||||
5 Reclassification of Financial Products deferred tax liability to a deferred tax asset on a consolidated basis. | |||||||||||||||||
6 Elimination of Financial Products short-term borrowings from Machinery and Engines. | |||||||||||||||||
7 Elimination of payables between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products. | |||||||||||||||||
8 Elimination of prepaid insurance in Financial Products' accrued expenses. | |||||||||||||||||
9 Elimination of Financial Products deferred liabilities with Machinery and Engines. | |||||||||||||||||
Page 49
Caterpillar Inc. Supplemental Data for Cash Flow For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 (Unaudited) (Millions of dollars) | |||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Consolidating Data | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Machinery and Engines1 | Financial Products | Consolidating Adjustments | ||||||||||||||
Cash flow from operating activities: | |||||||||||||||||
Profit | $ | 1,484 | $ | 1,484 | $ | 258 | $ | (258 | )2 | ||||||||
Adjustments for non-cash items: | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,055 | 612 | 443 | - | |||||||||||||
Undistributed profit of Financial Products | - | (258 | ) | - | 258 | 3 | |||||||||||
Other | (120 | ) | (103 | ) | 24 | (41 | )4 | ||||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||
Receivables - trade and other | (461 | ) | (284 | ) | (34 | ) | (143 | )4 | |||||||||
Inventories | (1,225 | ) | (1,225 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 815 | 657 | (33 | ) | 191 | 4 | |||||||||||
Other - net | (13 | ) | (125 | ) | 119 | (7 | )4 | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,535 | 758 | 777 | - | |||||||||||||
Cash flow from investing activities: | |||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures - excluding equipment leased to others | (519 | ) | (460 | ) | (59 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Expenditures for equipment leased to others | (827 | ) | (2 | ) | (825 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment | 531 | 19 | 512 | - | |||||||||||||
Additions to finance receivables | (16,493 | ) | - | (16,493 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Collection of finance receivables | 13,010 | - | 13,010 | - | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of financereceivables | 1,434 | - | 1,434 | - | |||||||||||||
Net intercompany borrowings | - | 203 | 30 | (233 | )5 | ||||||||||||
Investments and acquisitions (net of cashacquired) | (284 | ) | (284 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||
Other - net | (193 | ) | (94 | ) | (99 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Net cash used for investing activities | (3,341 | ) | (618 | ) | (2,490 | ) | (233 | ) | |||||||||
Cash flow from financing activities: | |||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid | (395 | ) | (395 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||
Common stock issued, including treasury shares reissued | 137 | 137 | - | - | |||||||||||||
Treasury shares purchased �� | (400 | ) | (400 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||
Net intercompany borrowings | - | (30 | ) | (203 | ) | 233 | 5 | ||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt issued | 4,532 | 263 | 4,269 | - | |||||||||||||
Payments on long-term debt | (2,615 | ) | (28 | ) | (2,587 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Short-term borrowings - net | 563 | 264 | 299 | - | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities | 1,822 | (189 | ) | 1,778 | 233 | ||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | 59 | 70 | (11 | ) | - | ||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and short-term investments | 75 | 21 | 54 | - | |||||||||||||
Cash and short-term investments at beginning of period | 342 | 220 | 122 | - | |||||||||||||
Cash and short-term investments at end of period | $ | 417 | $ | 241 | $ | 176 | $ | - | |||||||||
1 Represents Caterpillar Inc. and its subsidiaries with Financial Products accounted for on the equity basis. | |||||||||||||||||
2 Elimination of Financial Products profit after tax due to equity method of accounting. | |||||||||||||||||
3 Non-cash adjustment for the undistributed earnings from Financial Products. | |||||||||||||||||
4 Elimination of non-cash adjustments and changes in assets and liabilities related to consolidated reporting. | |||||||||||||||||
5 Net proceeds and payments to/from Machinery and Engines and Financial Products. | |||||||||||||||||
Page 50
Caterpillar Inc. Supplemental Data for Cash Flow For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 (Unaudited) (Millions of dollars) | |||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Consolidating Data | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Machinery and Engines 1 | Financial Products | Consolidating Adjustments | ||||||||||||||
Cash flow from operating activities: | |||||||||||||||||
Profit | $ | 750 | $ | 750 | $ | 186 | $ | (186 | )2 | ||||||||
Adjustments for non-cash items: | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,008 | 611 | 397 | - | |||||||||||||
Undistributed profit of Financial Products | - | (186 | ) | - | 186 | 3 | |||||||||||
Other | 46 | 39 | 12 | (5 | )4 | ||||||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||
Receivables - trade and other | (220 | ) | (140 | ) | (120 | ) | 40 | 4 | |||||||||
Inventories | (294 | ) | (294 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 108 | 87 | 21 | - | |||||||||||||
Other - net | 9 | (80 | ) | 107 | (18 | )4 | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,407 | 787 | 603 | 17 | |||||||||||||
Cash flow from investing activities: | |||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures - excluding equipment leased to others | (352 | ) | (335 | ) | (17 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Expenditures for equipment leased to others | (781 | ) | (10 | ) | (771 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment | 451 | - | 451 | - | |||||||||||||
Additions to finance receivables | (12,245 | ) | - | (12,245 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Collection of finance receivables | 10,044 | - | 10,044 | - | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of financereceivables | 1,472 | - | 1,472 | - | |||||||||||||
Net intercompany borrowings | - | 391 | 2 | (393 | )5 | ||||||||||||
Investments and acquisitions (net of cashacquired) | (26 | ) | (17 | ) | (9 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Other - net | (55 | ) | (6 | ) | (82 | ) | 33 | 6 | |||||||||
Net cash used for investing activities | (1,492 | ) | 23 | (1,155 | ) | (360 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash flow from financing activities: | |||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid | (361 | ) | (361 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||
Common stock issued, including treasury shares reissued | 81 | 81 | 33 | (33 | )6 | ||||||||||||
Net intercompany borrowings | - | - | (391 | ) | 391 | 5 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt issued | 4,233 | 83 | 4,150 | - | |||||||||||||
Payments on long-term debt | (2,992 | ) | (500 | ) | (2,492 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Short-term borrowings - net | (788 | ) | (2 | ) | (786 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities | 173 | (699 | ) | 514 | 358 | ||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | - | 6 | 9 | (15 | )7 | ||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and short-term investments | 88 | 117 | (29 | ) | - | ||||||||||||
Cash and short-term investments at beginning of period | 309 | 146 | 163 | - | |||||||||||||
Cash and short-term investments at end of period | $ | 397 | $ | 263 | $ | 134 | $ | - | |||||||||
1 Represents Caterpillar Inc. and its subsidiaries with Financial Products accounted for on the equity basis. | |||||||||||||||||
2 Elimination of Financial Products profit after tax due to equity method of accounting. | |||||||||||||||||
3 Non-cash adjustment for the undistributed earnings from Financial Products. | |||||||||||||||||
4 Elimination of non-cash adjustments and changes in assets and liabilities related to consolidated reporting. | |||||||||||||||||
5 Net proceeds and payments to/from Machinery and Engines and Financial Products. | |||||||||||||||||
6 Change in investment and common stock related to Financial Products. | |||||||||||||||||
7 Elimination of the effect of exchange on intercompany balances. | |||||||||||||||||
Page 51
G. Safe Harbor Statement under the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Certain statements contained in our third-quarter 2004 Form 10-Q are forward-looking and involve uncertainties that could significantly impact results. The words "believes," "expects," "estimates," "anticipates," "will be", "should" and similar words or expressions identify forward-looking statements made on behalf of Caterpillar. Uncertainties include factors that affect international businesses, as well as matters specific to the company and the markets it serves.
World Economic Factors
The world economy is experiencing the fastest growth in years and inflation remains well behaved. Our outlook assumes that inflation will remain under control and that central bankers will raise interest rates cautiously. Continued low interest rates should allow the world economy to grow between 3.5 and 4 percent throughout the forecast period, prolonging recoveries in business investment and mining. Should inflation worsen, or central banks raise interest rates aggressively, both the world economic recovery and our machinery and engines sales likely would be weaker.
Recent economic data suggest the U. S. economy improved to about a 4 percent growth rate in the third quarter. Our outlook assumes that moderate inflation will encourage the Fed to raise interest rates gradually, allowing the recovery to continue. This recovery, combined with good business profits and favorable metals and coal prices, will support further growth in construction and mining. If, however, the U. S. economy falters or business finances deteriorate, expected improvements in machinery and engines sales likely would not occur.
The EAME region has experienced the slowest recovery among the regions, primarily due to a weak recovery in Europe. Economies in both Africa/Middle East (AME) and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) have been more robust due to higher metals and energy prices. Our outlook assumes that a low interest rate environment will lead to better growth in Europe and that favorable commodity prices will extend healthy recoveries in both AME and the CIS. Should those expectations not materialize, our results likely will be lower than projected.
Increased capital inflows, low domestic interest rates and favorable commodity prices have combined to produce the best economic growth in Latin America in years. Our outlook assumes those factors will remain in place throughout the forecast period. Adverse changes, such as lower capital inflows, much higher interest rates or a collapse in commodity prices, would harm the recovery and our sales of machinery and engines.
The Chinese government’s curbs on selected development projects caused machinery sales to decline. So far, mining booms and some growth in construction in other countries offset lower sales in China. Our forecast assumes a similar balance will continue in the future. Should the decline in China worsen, or the mining boom weaken, machinery and engines sales would be lower than projected.
Commodity Prices
Commodities represent a significant sales opportunity, with prices and production as key drivers. Prices have improved sharply over the past year and our outlook assumes continued growth in the world economy will cause metals prices to hold at or above recent prices in 2004. Any unexpected weakening in world industrial production, however, could cause prices to drop sharply to the detriment of our results.
Coal production and prices have improved this year and our sales have benefited. We expect these trends to continue. Should coal prices soften, due to a slowing in world economic growth, the ongoing sales recovery would be vulnerable.
Oil and natural gas prices have continued fairly high into 2004 due to strong demand and tight inventories. We do not yet view higher energy prices as a threat to economies since it is strong demand that is boosting prices and world production is still increasing. However, should significant supply cuts occur, such as from OPEC production cuts or political unrest in a major producing country, the resulting oil shortages and price spikes likely would slow economies, potentially with a depressing impact on our sales.
Monetary and Fiscal Policies
For most companies operating in a global economy, monetary and fiscal policies implemented in the United States and abroad could have a significant impact on economic growth, and accordingly, demand for a product. In general, higher than expected interest rates, reductions in government spending, higher taxes, significant currency devaluations, and uncertainty over key policies are some factors likely to lead to slower economic growth and lower industry demand.
With economic data looking more favorable, Central Banks in developed countries have started raising interest rates from the lowest rates in decades. Our outlook assumes that Central Banks will take great care to ensure that economic recoveries continue and that interest rates will remain low throughout the forecast period. Should Central Banks raise interest rates too aggressively, both economic growth and our sales could suffer.
Budget deficits in many countries have increased, which has limited the ability of governments to boost economies with tax cuts and more spending. Our outlook assumes that governments will not aggressively raise taxes and slash spending to deal with their budget imbalances. Such actions could disrupt growth and negatively affect sales to public construction.
Page 52
Political Factors
Political factors in the United States and abroad have a major impact on global companies. Our outlook assumes that the outcome of the upcoming national election will not materially impact the United States or global economy. Should this prove incorrect and a new administration materially changes the current economic policies, our results could be negatively impacted.
Our outlook assumes that there will be no major wars in either North Korea or the Middle East in the forecast period. Such military conflicts could severely disrupt sales into countries affected, as well as nearby countries.
Our outlook also assumes that there will be no major terrorist attacks. If there is a major terrorist attack, confidence could be undermined, potentially causing a sharp drop in economic activities and our sales. Attacks in major developed economies would be the most disruptive.
Our outlook assumes that efforts by countries to increase their exports will not result in retaliatory countermeasures by other countries to block such exports, particularly in the Asia/Pacific region. In addition, our outlook assumes the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, or any other tax law changes, will not negatively impact our provision for income taxes.
Currency Fluctuations
The company has costs and revenues in many currencies and is therefore exposed to risks arising from currency fluctuations. Many currency positions are fairly closely balanced, which, along with the diversity of currency positions, helps diminish exchange rate risks. Our outlook assumes that currency movements are in line with historical volatilities. Should currency markets become unstable, government actions to cope with unfavorable currency fluctuations could disrupt world trade and growth, negatively impacting our results.
The company's largest manufacturing presence is in the United States. So any unexpected strengthening of the dollar tends to raise the foreign currency value of costs and reduce our global competitiveness.
The stronger euro had a favorable impact on translating European sales into U. S. dollars in the third quarter. The outlook assumes similar benefits in the future. Should the euro collapse, our results could be negatively impacted.
Dealer Practices
The company sells primarily through an independent dealer network. Dealers carry inventories of both new and rental equipment and adjust those inventories based on their assessments of future needs. Such adjustments can impact our results either positively or negatively. The current outlook assumes dealers will increase inventories in line with higher deliveries. Should dealers control inventories more tightly, our sales would be lower.
Other Factors
The rate of infrastructure spending, housing starts, commercial construction and mining play a significant role in the company's results. Our products are an integral component of these activities and as these activities increase or decrease in the United States or abroad, demand for our products may be significantly impacted.
Projected cost savings or synergies from alliances with new partners could also be negatively impacted by a variety of factors. These factors could include, among other things, higher than expected wages, energy and/or material costs, and/or higher than expected financing costs due to unforeseen changes in tax, trade, environmental, labor, safety, payroll or pension policies in any of the jurisdictions where the alliances conduct their operations.
Our outlook assumes that there will be no significant work stoppages at any of our facilities worldwide. On August 15, 2004, employee members of the United Auto Workers (UAW) voted to reject the company's last, best and final contract proposal for a new 6-year labor agreement. The Company’s last, best and final offer remains as our current offer. The previous labor agreement expired April 1, 2004, and was extended during collective bargaining negotiations until April 25, 2004. Although the previous agreement is expired, our employees are continuing to work under its terms. Operations continue as normal. If for whatever reason, a prolonged labor disruption were to happen, our sales and revenues and profit results would likely be negatively impacted, particularly in the event of a subsequent union employee work stoppage.
Results may be impacted positively or negatively by changes in the sales mix. Our outlook assumes a certain geographic mix of sales as well as a product mix of sales. If actual results vary from this projected geographic and product mix of sales, our results could be negatively impacted.
The company operates in a highly competitive environment and our outlook depends on a forecast of the company's share of industry sales. An unexpected reduction in that share could result from pricing or product strategies pursued by competitors, unanticipated product or manufacturing difficulties, a failure to price the product competitively, or an unexpected buildup in competitors' new machine or dealer owned rental fleets, leading to severe downward pressure on machine rental rates and/or used equipment prices.
Page 53
The environment remains competitive from a pricing standpoint. Our 2004 outlook assumes that the company is successful in implementing worldwide machine price increases communicated to dealers with an effective date of July 1, 2004. If the price actions are not accepted in the marketplace, our results will be negatively impacted. Moreover, additional price discounting could result in lower than anticipated realization. Our preliminary 2005 sales outlook assumes that the company is successful in implementing worldwide machine price increases communicated to dealers with an effective date of January 2005. While we expect that the environment will absorb these price actions, delays in the marketplace acceptance would negatively impact our results. Moreover, additional price discounting to maintain our competitiv e position could result in lower than anticipated realization.
Inherent in the operation of the Financial Products Division is the credit risk associated with its customers. The creditworthiness of each customer, and the rate of delinquencies, repossessions and net losses on customer obligations are directly impacted by several factors, including, but not limited to, relevant industry and economic conditions, the availability of capital, the experience and expertise of the customer's management team, commodity prices, political events, and the sustained value of the underlying collateral. Additionally, interest rate movements create a degree of risk to our operations by affecting the amount of our interest payments and the value of our fixed rate debt. Our match funding policy manages interest rate risk by matching the interest rate profile (fixed rate or floating rate) of our debt portfolio with the interest rate profile of our receivables portfolio within certain parameters. To achieve our match funding objectives, we issue debt with similar interest rate profile to our receivables and also use interest rate swap agreements to manage our interest rate risk exposure to interest rate changes and in some cases to lower our cost of borrowed funds. If interest rates move upward more sharply than anticipated, our financial results could be negatively impacted. With respect to our insurance and investment management operations, changes in the equity and bond markets could cause an impairment of the value of our investment portfolio, thus requiring a negative adjustment to earnings.
In general, our results are sensitive to changes in economic growth, particularly those originating in construction, mining and energy. Developments reducing such activities also tend to lower our sales. In addition to the factors mentioned above, our results could be negatively impacted by any of the following:
§ | Any sudden drop in consumer or business confidence |
§ | Delays in legislation needed to fund public construction |
§ | Regulatory or legislative changes that slow activity in key industries; and/or |
§ | Unexpected collapses in stock markets. |
This discussion of uncertainties is by no means exhaustive but is designed to highlight important factors that may impact our outlook. Obvious factors such as general economic conditions throughout the world do not warrant further discussion, but are noted to further emphasize the myriad of contingencies that may cause the company's actual results to differ from those currently anticipated.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on that evaluation, the company's management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. During the most recent fiscal quarte r, there have been no significant changes in the company's internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting. Although the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote, management's evaluation provided reasonable assurance that these controls will be effective.
Page 54
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
The disclosure regarding legal proceedings contained in Part II - Item 1 "Legal Proceedings" of our Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 is updated by the following disclosure:
On January 16, 2002, Caterpillar commenced an action in the Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Illinois in Peoria, Illinois, against Navistar International Transportation Corporation and International Truck and Engine Corporation (collectively Navistar). The lawsuit arises out of a long-term purchase contract between Caterpillar and Navistar effective May 31, 1988, as amended from time to time (the Purchase Agreement). The pending complaint alleges that Navistar breached its contractual obligations by: (i) paying Caterpillar $8.08 less per fuel injector than the agreed upon price for new unit injectors delivered by Caterpillar; (ii) refusing to pay contractually agreed upon surcharges owed as a result of Navistar ordering less than planned volumes of replacement unit injectors; and (iii) refusing to pay contractually agreed upon interest stemming from Navistar’s late payments. At September 30, 2004, the past due receivable from Navistar regarding the foregoing was $139 million. The pending complaint also has claims alleging that Franklin Power Products, Inc., Newstream Enterprises, and Navistar, collectively and individually, failed to pay the applicable price for shipments of unit injectors to Franklin and Newstream. At September 30, 2004, the past due receivables for the foregoing totaled $12 million. The pending complaint further alleges that Sturman Industries, Inc., and Sturman Engine Systems, Inc., colluded with Navistar to utilize technology that Sturman Industries, Inc., misappropriated from Caterpillar to help Navistar develop its G2 fuel system, and tortiously interfered with the Purchase Agreement and Caterpillar’s prospective economic relationship with Navistar. The pending complaint further alleges that the two parties’ collusion led Navistar to select Sturman Engine Sy stems, Inc. and another company, instead of Caterpillar, to develop and manufacture the G2 fuel system.
On May 7, 2002, International Truck and Engine Corporation (International) commenced an action against Caterpillar in the Circuit Court of DuPage County, Illinois that alleges Caterpillar breached various aspects of a long-term agreement term sheet. In its fourth amended complaint, International seeks a declaration from the court that the term sheet constitutes a legally binding contract for the sale of heavy-duty engines at specified prices through the end of 2006, alleges that Caterpillar breached the term sheet by raising certain prices effective October 1, 2002, and also alleges that Caterpillar breached an obligation to negotiate a comprehensive long-term agreement referenced in the term sheet. International further claims that Caterpillar improperly restricted the supply of heavy-duty engines to Internati onal from June through September 2002, and claims that Caterpillar made certain fraudulent misrepresentations with respect to the availability of engines during this time period. International seeks damages "in an amount to be determined at trial" and injunctive relief. Caterpillar filed an answer denying International's claims and has filed a counterclaim seeking a declaration that the term sheet has been effectively terminated. Caterpillar denies International's claims and will vigorously contest them. On September 24, 2003, the Appellate Court of Illinois, ruling on an interlocutory appeal, issued an order consistent with Caterpillar's position that, even if the court subsequently determines that the term sheet is a binding contract, it is indefinite in duration and was therefore terminable at will by Caterpillar after a reasonable period. Caterpillar anticipates that a trial currently scheduled to begin in the first quarter of 2005 will address all remaining issues in this matter. This matter is not related to the breach of contract action brought by Caterpillar against Navistar currently pending in the Circuit Court of Peoria County, Illinois.
The EU is imposing retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. origin goods as a result of a WTO decision that found the extraterritorial income exclusion (ETI) provisions of the FSC Repeal and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act of 2000 constituted a prohibited export subsidy. These tariffs, which began in March of 2004 at 5 percent, have increased 1 percentage point per month and would increase to 17 percent after one year. Given the makeup of the final retaliation list, some Caterpillar parts and components are subject to these tariffs. We do not believe these tariffs will materially impact our fi nancial results. The company has production facilities in the EU, Russia, Asia, and South America. Products sold into the EU from these plants are not affected by this retaliatory tariff. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (Act), enacted on October 22, 2004, phases-out the ETI provisions. As a result, the EU announced that it plans to end the retaliatory sanctions pending the outcome of a WTO review to determine whether certain provisions of the Act are compliant with the ruling against the FSC/ETI regime. The sanctions are not expected to be lifted officially until January 1, 2005.
Page 55
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period | Total number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased Under the Program | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program1 | |||||||||
July 1-31, 2004 | 550,000 | $ | 72.61 | 550,000 | 22,373,269 | ||||||||
August 1-31, 2004 | 1,537,000 | 71.53 | 1,537,000 | 20,927,879 | |||||||||
September 1-30, 2004 | - | - | - | 21,235,956 | |||||||||
Total | 2,087,000 | $ | 71.81 | 2,087,000 | |||||||||
1 On October 8, 2003, the board of directors approved an extension of the share repurchase program (through October 2008) with the goal of reducing the company's outstanding shares to 320,000,000. Amount represents the shares outstanding at the end of the period less 320,000,000. | |||||||||||||
Non-U.S. Employee Stock Purchase Plans
We have 27 employee stock purchase plans administered outside the United States for our foreign employees. As of September 30, 2004, those plans had approximately 8,165 participants in the aggregate. During the third quarter of 2004, approximately 54,500 shares of Caterpillar common stock or foreign denominated equivalents were distributed under the plans. Participants in some foreign plans have the option of receiving non-U.S. share certificates (foreign-denominated equivalents) in lieu of U.S. shares of Caterpillar Inc. common stock upon withdrawal from the plan. These equivalent certificates are tradable only on the local stock market and are included in our determination of shares outstanding.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | |||||
(a) | Exhibits: | ||||
10.1 | Caterpillar Inc. 1996 Stock Option and Long-Term Incentive Plan, amended and restated effective January 1, 2004. | ||||
31.1 | Certification of James W. Owens, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Caterpillar Inc., as required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||||
31.2 | Certification of F. Lynn McPheeters, Chief Financial Officer of Caterpillar Inc., as required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||||
32 | Certification of James W. Owens, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Caterpillar Inc. and F. Lynn McPheeters, Chief Financial Officer of Caterpillar Inc., as required pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||||
(b) | During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, reports on Form 8-K were filed as follows: | ||||
Date | Item # | ||||
September 28, 2004 | Item 2.02 | ||||
September 29, 2004 | Item 2.03 | ||||
July 22, 2004 | Item 5 | ||||
August 18, 2004 | Item 5 | ||||
July 12, 2004 | Item 9 | ||||
July 22, 2004 | Item 12 | ||||
Additional reports on Form 8-K were filed as follows: | |||||
Date | Item # | ||||
October 13, 2004 (3 reports) | Item 5.02 | ||||
October 21, 2004 | Items 2.02, 7.01, and 9.01 | ||||
October 21, 2004 | Item 7.01 |
Page 56
SIGNATURES | |||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. | |||
CATERPILLAR INC. | |||
November 8, 2004 | /s/ James W. Owens | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | |
November 8, 2004 | /s/ F. Lynn McPheeters | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
November 8, 2004 | /s/ David B. Burritt | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer | |
November 8, 2004 | /s/ James B. Buda | Secretary | |
Page 57