| 1 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| | 7 |
| | A. | Directors and Senior Management | 7 |
| | B. | Advisers | 7 |
| | C. | Auditors | 7 |
| | 7 |
| | 7
|
| | A. | [Reserved] | 7
|
| | B. | | 7
|
| | C. | | 7
|
| | D. | | 7
|
| | 23 |
| | A. | | 23 |
| | B. | | 32 |
| | C. | | 35 |
| | D. | | 36 |
| | 37 |
| | A. | | 38 |
| | B. | | 41 |
| | C. | | 42 |
| | D. | | 42 |
| | E. | | 42 |
| | 43 |
| | A. | | 43 |
| | B. | | 46 |
| | C. | | 52 |
| | D. | | 54 |
| | E. | | 54 |
| | 55 |
| | A. | | 55 |
| | B. | | 56 |
| | C. | | 56 |
| | 56 |
| | A. | | 56 |
| | B. | | 56 |
| | 56 |
| | A. | | 57 |
| | B. | | 57 |
| | C. | | 57 |
| | D. | | 57 |
| | E. | | 57 |
| | F. | | 57 |
| | 57 |
| | A. | | 57 |
| | B. | | 57 |
| | C. | | 68 |
| | D. | | 69 |
| | E. | | 69 |
| | F. | | 77 |
| | G. | | 77 |
| | H. | | 77 |
| | I. | | 78 |
| | 78 |
| | 78 |
| | A. | | 78 |
| | B. | | 78 |
| | C. | | 78 |
| | D. | | 78 |
| 80 |
| | 80 |
| | 80 |
| | 80 |
| | 81 |
| | 81 |
| | 81 |
| | 81 |
| | 81 |
| | 81 |
| | 82 |
| | 82 |
| | 82 |
| 83 |
| | 83 |
| | 83 |
| | 84 |
ioneer Ltd (“ioneer” or the “Company”) is the operator and 100% owner of the Rhyolite Ridge Lithium-Boron Project (“Rhyolite Ridge” or “the Project”) located in Nevada, the only known lithium-boron deposit in North America and one of only two known such deposits in the world. Rhyolite Ridge is expected to become a globally significant, long-life, cost-effective source of lithium and boron vital to a sustainable future.
Rhyolite Ridge’s unique mineralogy allows lithium and boron to be extracted in a low-cost and environmentally sustainable manner. The Project’s commercial viability is made possible by having both lithium and boron revenue streams.
On April 30, 2020, we completed a definitive feasibility study (the “DFS”) which demonstrated that the Project can operate at scale, over a long life and with the potential to be a low-cost and globally significant producer of both lithium and boron. Following the completion of all technical studies and all necessary permitting activities, we may undertake mining and processing activities to become a U.S. source of lithium and boron. As of June 30, 2022, we had invested A$171.8 million in the Rhyolite Ridge Project.
On September 16, 2021, we reached an agreement to enter into a strategic placement (the “Sibanye-Stillwater Placement”) and a joint venture (the “Joint Venture” and, together with the Sibanye-Stillwater Placement, the “Strategic Partnership”) with Sibanye-Stillwater Limited (“Sibanye-Stillwater”), one of the world’s largest precious metals mining companies, to develop the Rhyolite Ridge Project. Under the terms of the Sibanye-Stillwater Placement, Sibanye-Stillwater subscribed for a strategic placement of US$70 million of ioneer’s ordinary shares. On October 21, 2021, our shareholders approved the Sibanye-Stillwater Placement at an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders. We closed the Sibanye-Stillwater Placement in October 2021 by issuing Sibanye-Stillwater approximately 145.9 million ordinary shares of ioneer at a price of A$0.655 per share.
Under the terms of the Joint Venture, subject to certain closing conditions set forth in the agreement, Sibanye-Stillwater will contribute US$490 million to acquire a 50% interest in the Project, with ioneer operating the Project and retaining a 50% interest in the Project. We expect the transactions encompassing the Joint Venture to close in the first half of calendar year 2023, subject to the satisfaction of the closing conditions, including us making a final investment decision (“FID”) regarding the Project, obtaining necessary project permits, and securing debt financing for the Project.
The subscription agreement providing for the Joint Venture is included as an exhibit to this annual report on Form 20-F.
Location of the Rhyolite Ridge Project in Nevada
Our U.S. office is located at 9460 Double R. Blvd, Suite 200, Reno, Nevada 89521. Our corporate office is located at Suite 5.03, Level 5, 140 Arthur Street North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia. The telephone number of our U.S. office is +1 (775) 382-4800 and the telephone number of our corporate office is +61 (2) 9922-5800.
Our ordinary shares are publicly traded on the Australian Securities Exchange, or ASX, under the symbol “INR”.
Our American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”), each representing 40 of our ordinary shares, are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) under the symbol “IONR”. The Bank of New York Mellon acts as depositary for the ADSs.
We also maintain a website at www.ioneer.com and a project website at therhyoliteridgeproject.com. The information contained on our website or available through our website is not incorporated by reference into and should not be considered a part of this annual report on Form 20-F, and the reference to our website in this annual report on Form 20-F is an inactive textual reference only.
Unless otherwise indicated or the context implies otherwise, any reference in this annual report on Form 20-F to:
• | “ioneer” refers to ioneer Ltd, unless otherwise indicated; |
• | “the Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our” refer to ioneer Ltd and its consolidated subsidiaries, through which it conducts its business, unless otherwise indicated; |
• | “shares” or “ordinary shares” refers to our ordinary shares; |
• | “ADS” refers to the American depositary shares; and |
• | “ASX” refers to the Australian Securities Exchange. |
Unless otherwise indicated, all references to “A$” are to Australian dollars, and all references to “US$” are to United States dollars. Our reporting and functional currency is the Australian dollar, although our U.S. subsidiaries use U.S. dollars as their reporting and functional currency. This annual report on Form 20-F contains references to U.S. dollars where the underlying transaction or event was denominated in U.S. dollars. This annual report on Form 20-F contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” This annual report on Form 20-F also includes statistical data, market data and other industry data and forecasts, which we obtained from market research, publicly available information and independent industry publications and reports that we believe to be reliable sources.
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO UNITED STATES INVESTORS
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the applicable U.S. and Australian securities laws, and as a result we report our mineral reserves and mineral resources as required by both of these standards. As an Australian listed public company, we are required to report estimates of mineral resources and ore reserves in terms of “Measured, Indicated and Inferred” Mineral Resources and “Proved and Probable” Ore Reserves in compliance with the JORC 2012, Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the “JORC Code”). The JORC Code was prepared by the Joint Ore Reserves Committee of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia. These defined terms contained within the JORC Code differ in some respects from the definitions under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), including in Regulation S-K, Subpart 1300 (“Subpart 1300”).
Information about mineral reserves and resources contained in this annual report on Form 20-F is also presented in compliance with Subpart 1300. While guidelines for reporting mineral resources, including subcategories of measured, indicated and inferred resources, are largely similar between JORC Code and Subpart 1300 standards, information contained herein that describes our mineral deposits may not be directly comparable to similar information made public by other U.S. companies under the SEC’s old reporting standard, Industry Guide 7, or to similar information published by other ASX-listed companies. Investors are cautioned that public disclosure by us of such mineral resources in Australia in accordance with ASX Listing Rules do not form a part of this annual report on Form 20-F.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain information included or incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form 20-F may be deemed to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Such forward-looking statements concern our anticipated results and progress of our operations in future periods, planned exploration and, if warranted, development of our properties, plans related to our business and other matters that may occur in the future. These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking, and the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “estimate”, “may”, “will”, “could”, “leading”, “intend”, “contemplate”, “shall” and similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this annual report on Form 20-F include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to:
• | risks related to our limited operating history in the lithium and boron industry; |
• | risks related to our status as a development stage company; |
• | risks related to our ability to identify mineralization and achieve commercial mining at the Project; |
• | risks related to mining, exploration and mine construction, if warranted, on our properties; |
• | risks related to our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and to develop positive cash flow from our mining activities; |
• | risks related to investment risk and operational costs associated with our exploration activities; |
• | risks related to our ability to access capital and the financial markets; |
• | risks related to compliance with government regulations; |
• | risks related to our ability to acquire necessary mining licenses, permits or access rights; |
• | risks related to environmental liabilities and reclamation costs; |
• | risks related to volatility in lithium or boron prices or demand for lithium or boron; |
• | risks related to stock price and trading volume volatility; |
• | risks relating to the development of an active trading market for the ADSs; |
• | risks related to ADS holders not having certain shareholder rights; |
• | risks related to ADS holders not receiving certain distributions; and |
• | risks related to our status as a foreign private issuer and emerging growth company. |
All forward-looking statements reflect our beliefs and assumptions based on information available at the time the assumption was made. These forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but rather on management’s expectations regarding future activities, results of operations, performance, future capital and other expenditures (including the amount, nature and sources of funding thereof), competitive advantages, business prospects and opportunities. By its nature, forward-looking information involves numerous assumptions, inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, known and unknown, that contribute to the possibility that the predictions, forecasts, projections or other forward-looking statements will not occur. Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated or expected. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Except as otherwise required by the securities laws of the United States and Australia, we disclaim any obligation to subsequently revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events. We qualify all the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report on Form 20-F by the foregoing cautionary statements.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Unless otherwise indicated, the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this annual report on Form 20-F have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) and interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, (the “IASB”) which differ in certain significant respects from Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and thus may not be comparable to financial statements of United States companies. Because the SEC has adopted rules to accept financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB without reconciliation to U.S. GAAP for foreign private issuers such as us, we will not be providing a description of the principal differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS.
Our fiscal year ends on June 30. We designate our fiscal year by the year in which that fiscal year ends – for example, “fiscal 2022” refers to our fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.
COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT
As required by Australian securities laws and the ASX Listing Rules, we hereby notify Australian investors that the information in this annual report that relates to mineral resources and ore reserves is based on estimates included in the report dated February 28, 2022, by Golder Associates Inc. entitled “Technical Report Summary of the Rhyolite Ridge Lithium-Boron Project” (the “TRS”), which is filed as an exhibit to this annual report on Form 20-F.
We confirm to Australian investors that: a) we are not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original ASX announcement or the Golder report; b) all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Mineral Resource Statement and Parameters and Ore Reserve Statement and Parameters included in the original ASX announcements continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this report have not been materially modified from the original ASX announcement or the Golder report.
ITEM 1. | IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS |
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. | OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE |
Not applicable.
B. | Capitalization and Indebtedness |
Not applicable.
C. | Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds |
Not applicable.
You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information in this annual report on Form 20-F. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be seriously harmed and you could lose all or part of your investment. Further, if we fail to meet the expectations of the public market in any given period, the market price of the ADSs could decline. We operate in a competitive environment that involves significant risks and uncertainties, some of which are outside of our control. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business and financial condition could suffer and the price of the ADSs could decline.
Business Risks
Our operations may be further disrupted, and our financial results may be adversely affected by the novel coronavirus pandemic.
The novel strain of coronavirus causing a contagious respiratory disease known as COVID-19, which was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020, poses a material risk to our business and operations. If a significant portion of our workforce or the consultants we have engaged to perform certain studies regarding our proposed operations becomes unable to work or travel to our operations due to illness or state or federal government restrictions (including regional and international travel restrictions and “shelter-in-place” and similar orders restricting certain activities that may be issued or extended by authorities), this could adversely affect our ability to meet our contractual obligations and forecast activities which may force us to reduce or suspend our exploration and development activities. Conversely, we also are exposed to counterparty risks that our customers or suppliers may fail to fulfill their contractual obligations. This risk may be heightened as a result of COVID-19 and may cause the Company's financial performance and business to be impacted where its customers or suppliers experience financial difficulties, reduce or discontinue operations or default on obligations owed to the Company. We continue to monitor legislative initiatives in the U.S. to provide relief to businesses impacted by COVID-19, such as the U.S. Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act, to determine their potential impacts or benefits (if any) to our business.
It is not possible at this time to estimate the full impact that the COVID-19 pandemic, the continued spread of COVID-19, and any additional measures taken by governments, health officials or by us in response to such spread, could have on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The COVID-19 pandemic and mitigation measures have also negatively impacted global economic conditions, which, in turn, have adversely affected our business, including by delaying the completion of our DFS. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic continues to impact our business will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new government actions or restrictions, new information that may emerge concerning the severity, longevity and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on economic activity.
To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business and financial results, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section. As at June 30, 2022 these impacts have not had a significant effect on our financial results or operations. However, because of the highly uncertain and dynamic nature of events relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is not currently possible to estimate the impact of the pandemic on our business in the future. These effects could have a material impact on our operations, and we will continue to monitor the COVID-19 situation closely.
We will need additional funds to develop the Project.
We estimate that development of the Project will require approximately US$785 million. We expect to fund this from the following sources: US$490 million of equity contributions from Sibanye-Stillwater to the Joint Venture, debt and existing cash on hand. Sibanye-Stillwater’s obligation to provide its equity contributions is subject to various conditions, including us making an FID regarding the Project, obtaining necessary project permits, and securing debt financing for the Project.
We cannot assure you that we will have, or will be able to raise on favorable terms or at all, sufficient cash to fully develop the Project and also to maintain adequate liquidity to satisfy future working capital requirements. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financing, we may not have the necessary cash resources to finance our business plan. If we are able to raise additional funds, these funds may be on less favorable terms than anticipated, which may adversely affect our future profitability and financial flexibility.
Funding terms may also place restrictions on the manner in which we conduct our business and impose limitations on our ability to execute on our business plan and growth strategies.
Our future performance is difficult to evaluate because we have a limited operating history.
We are a development stage company and have not realized any revenues to date from the sale of lithium or boron. Our immediate operating cash flow needs are expected to be significant and to be financed primarily through issuances of our ordinary shares and not through cash flows derived from our operations. As a result, we have little historical financial and operating information available to help you evaluate our performance.
We cannot guarantee that our properties will result in the commercial extraction of mineral deposits.
We are engaged in the business of developing mineral properties with the intention of locating economic deposits of minerals. Our Rhyolite Ridge property interest is at the development stage. Accordingly, it is unlikely that we will realize profits in the short term, and we cannot assure you that we will realize profits in the medium to long term. Any profitability in the future from our business will be dependent upon development of mineral deposits and further exploration and development of other economic deposits of minerals, each of which is subject to numerous risk factors. Further, we cannot assure you that, even to the extent mineral deposits have been located, any of our property interests can be commercially mined. The exploration and development of mineral deposits involves a high degree of financial risk over a significant period of time which a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge of management may not eliminate. While discovery of additional ore-bearing deposits may result in substantial rewards, few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to construct mining and processing facilities. It is impossible to ensure that our current development and exploration programs will result in profitable commercial mining operations. The profitability of our operations will be, in part, directly related to the cost and success of our development and exploration programs which may be affected by a number of factors. Additional expenditures are required to commercially mine and to construct, complete and install mining and processing facilities in those properties that are actually mined and developed.
In addition, development stage projects like ours have no operating history upon which to base estimates of future operating costs and capital requirements. Estimates of reserves, ore recoveries and cash operating costs are to a large extent based upon the interpretation of geologic data, obtained from a limited number of drill holes and other sampling techniques, and feasibility studies. Actual operating costs and economic returns of any and all projects may materially differ from estimated costs and returns, and accordingly, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be negatively affected.
We face risks related to mining, exploration and mine construction on our properties.
Our level of profitability, if any, in future years will depend to a great degree on lithium and boron prices and whether our properties can be brought into production. Whether it will be economically feasible to extract ore deposits depends on a number of factors, including, but not limited to: the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure; sale prices; mining, processing and transportation costs; the willingness of lenders and investors to provide project financing; labor costs and possible labor strikes; and governmental regulations, including, without limitation, regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting materials, foreign exchange, environmental protection, employment, worker safety, transportation, and reclamation and closure obligations. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in us receiving an inadequate return on invested capital. In addition, we are subject to the risks normally encountered in the mining industry, such as:
• | the discovery of unusual or unexpected geological formations; |
• | accidental fires, floods, earthquakes or other natural disasters; |
• | unplanned power outages and water shortages; |
• | controlling water and other similar mining hazards; |
• | operating labor disruptions and labor disputes; |
• | the ability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment, or labor; |
• | our liability for pollution or other hazards; and |
• | other known and unknown risks involved in the conduct of exploration and operation of mines. |
The nature of these risks is such that liabilities could exceed any applicable insurance policy limits or could be excluded from coverage. There are also risks against which we cannot insure or against which we may elect not to insure. The potential costs which could be associated with any liabilities not covered by insurance, or in excess of insurance coverage, or compliance with applicable laws and regulations may cause substantial delays and require significant capital outlays, adversely affecting our future earnings and competitive position and, potentially our financial viability.
Our long-term success will depend ultimately on our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and to develop positive cash flow from our mining activities.
Our long-term success, including the recoverability of the carrying values of our assets, our ability to acquire additional projects, and continuing with development, exploration and commissioning and mining activities on our existing projects, will depend ultimately on our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and to develop positive cash flow from our operations by establishing ore bodies that contain commercially recoverable deposits and develop profitable mining activities. The economic viability of our mining activities has many risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to:
• | a significant, prolonged decrease in the market prices of lithium or boron; |
• | difficulty in marketing and/or selling lithium or boron; |
• | significantly higher than expected capital costs to construct our mine; |
• | significantly higher than expected extraction costs; |
• | significantly lower than expected ore extraction; |
• | significantly lower than expected recoveries; |
• | significant delays, reductions or stoppages of ore extraction activities; |
• | significant delays in achieving commercial operations; and |
• | the introduction of significantly more stringent regulatory laws and regulations. |
Our future mining activities may change as a result of any one or more of these risks and uncertainties, and we cannot assure you that any ore body that we extract mineralized materials from will result in achieving and maintaining profitability and developing positive cash flow.
We depend on our ability to successfully access the capital and financial markets. Any inability to access the capital or financial markets may limit our ability to execute our business plan or pursue investments that we may rely on for future growth.
We rely on access to long-term capital markets as a source of liquidity for our capital and operating requirements. We will require additional capital to establish any future mining operations, which would require funds for construction and working capital. We cannot assure you that such additional funding will be available to us on satisfactory terms, or at all, or that we will be successful in commencing commercial lithium extraction, or that our sales projections will be realized.
In order to finance our future capital needs, we expect to raise additional funds through the issuance of additional equity or debt securities. Depending on the type and the terms of any financing we pursue, shareholders’ rights and the value of their investment in our ordinary shares or the ADSs could be reduced. Any additional equity financing will dilute shareholdings, and new or additional debt financing, if available, may involve restrictions on financing and operating activities. In addition, if we issue secured debt securities, the holders of the debt would have a claim to our assets that would be prior to the rights of shareholders until the debt is paid. Interest on such debt securities would increase costs and negatively impact operating results. If the issuance of new securities results in diminished rights to holders of our ordinary shares or the ADSs, the market price of the ADSs could be negatively impacted.
If we are unable to obtain additional financing, as needed, at competitive rates, our ability to implement our business plan and strategy may be affected, and we may be required to reduce the scope of our operations and scale back our exploration, development and mining programs. There is, however, no guarantee that we will be able to secure any additional funding or be able to secure funding which will provide us with sufficient funds to meet our objectives, which may adversely affect our business and financial position.
Certain market disruptions may increase our cost of borrowing or affect our ability to access one or more financial markets. Such market disruptions could result from:
• | adverse economic conditions; |
• | adverse general capital market conditions; |
• | poor performance and health of the lithium or mining industries in general; |
• | bankruptcy or financial distress of unrelated lithium companies or marketers; |
• | significant decrease in the demand for lithium; or |
• | adverse regulatory actions that affect our exploration and construction plans or the use of lithium generally. |
Our efforts to grow may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Future growth may place strains on our financial, technical, operational and administrative resources and cause us to rely more on project partners and independent contractors, potentially adversely affecting our financial position and results of operations. Our ability to grow will depend on a number of factors, including:
• | our ability to develop existing properties; |
• | our ability to obtain leases or options on properties; |
• | our ability to identify and acquire new exploratory prospects; |
• | our ability to continue to retain and attract skilled personnel; |
• | our ability to maintain or enter into new relationships with project partners and independent contractors; |
• | the results of our development and exploration programs; |
• | the market prices for our production; |
• | our access to capital; and |
• | our ability to enter into sales arrangements. |
We may not be successful in upgrading our technical, operational and administrative resources or increasing our internal resources sufficiently to provide certain of the services currently provided by third parties, and we may not be able to maintain or enter into new relationships with project partners and independent contractors on financially attractive terms, if at all. Our inability to achieve or manage growth may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our failure to successfully consummate, manage and integrate our Joint Venture with Sibanye-Stillwater, or any other strategic partnerships we may enter into, could have an adverse effect on us.
We believe that the Joint Venture with Sibanye-Stillwater will give us additional capital to fund our growth and expand our operational capabilities. However, our failure to successfully manage and integrate the Joint Venture or any future strategic partnerships we enter into could have adverse consequences on us. Additionally, at this time we cannot predict what effect, if any, the Joint Venture or an investment by any potential future strategic partners will have on the trading price of our ordinary shares or the ADSs.
We expect the transactions encompassing the Joint Venture to close in the first half of calendar year 2023. However, the closing of such transactions is subject to various conditions precedent, including us making an FID regarding the Rhyolite Ridge Project, obtaining necessary project permits, and securing adequate debt financing. We cannot guarantee that these conditions precedent will be satisfied or that the Joint Venture transactions will be consummated successfully or at all, or according to our anticipated timeline. If for any reason the Joint Venture is not consummated successfully or at all, or according to our anticipated timeline, the trading price of our ordinary shares or the ADSs may be adversely affected and we may need to seek a new strategic partnership or other sources of capital in order to fund our growth, which we cannot guarantee we will successfully obtain.
We are dependent upon key management employees.
The responsibility of overseeing the day-to-day operations and the strategic management of our business depends substantially on our senior management and our key personnel. Loss of such personnel may have an adverse effect on our performance. The success of our operations will depend upon numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including our ability to attract and retain additional key personnel in sales, marketing, technical support and finance. We currently depend upon a relatively small number of key persons to seek out and form strategic alliances and find and retain additional employees. Certain areas in which we operate are highly competitive regions and competition for qualified personnel is intense. We may be unable to hire suitable field personnel for our technical team or there may be periods of time where a particular position remains vacant while a suitable replacement is identified and appointed. We may not be successful in attracting and retaining the personnel required to grow and operate our business profitably.
Our growth will require new personnel, which we will be required to recruit, hire, train and retain.
Members of our management team possess significant experience and have previously carried out or been exposed to exploration and production activities including development of greenfield lithium projects into commercial production. However, we have limited operating history with respect to lithium projects and our ability to achieve our objectives depends on the ability of our directors, officers and management to implement current plans and respond to any unforeseen circumstances that require changes to those plans. The execution of our exploration and development plans will place demands on us and our management. Our ability to recruit and assimilate new personnel will be critical to our performance. We will be required to recruit additional personnel and to train, motivate and manage employees, which may adversely affect our plans.
Lawsuits against us or affecting our interests in the Rhyolite Ridge Project may be filed, and an adverse ruling in any such lawsuit may adversely affect our business, financial condition or liquidity or the market price of the ADSs.
In the normal course of our business, we may become involved in, named as a party to, or be the subject of, various legal proceedings, including regulatory proceedings, tax proceedings and legal actions, relating to personal injuries, property damage, property taxes, land rights, endangered species, the environment and contract disputes, or our interests may be indirectly affected by such legal proceedings. The outcome of outstanding, pending or future proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty and may be determined adversely to us and as a result, could have a material adverse effect on our assets, liabilities, business, financial condition or results of operations. Even if we prevail in any such legal proceeding, the proceedings could be costly and time-consuming and may divert the attention of management and key personnel from our business operations, which could adversely affect our financial condition.
While such lawsuits and regulatory proceedings have not impacted our permitting or development activities, future legal challenges by third parties, such as environmental advocacy groups, could materially adversely affect our operations.
Government regulations relating to mineral rights tenure, permission to disturb areas and the right to operate have the potential to materially adversely affect us.
The Project is located on federal lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management (the “BLM”) under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (“FLPMA”). Proposed BLM actions require review under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), and we are currently seeking NEPA review and BLM approval under FLPMA to mine our properties at Rhyolite Ridge. The process for permitting applications is often complex and time-consuming, requiring a significant amount of time and other resources. The duration and success of efforts to obtain permits are contingent upon many variables outside of the Company’s control. Any amendments to our development, mining or production plans would need to be approved by relevant regulatory authorities. There is no certainty that any future permitting changes will be approved.
Certain key federal and other state permits are required for the Rhyolite Ridge Project to proceed. These include air quality, water pollution control, and reclamation permits and approvals of the Company’s use of water under the water rights certificates and permits the Company holds. Applications have been submitted for many of the necessary permits and rights. The Company has received a Water Pollution Control Permit and Class II Air Quality Permit from the State of Nevada. The Company believes its applications are compliant with applicable laws and regulations and that the regulatory authorities will approve them. There can be no assurance that all necessary approvals and permits will be obtained for either of the Company’s projects, projected timelines for agency permitting decisions will be met, or the projected costs of permitting will prove accurate. In addition, most major permitting authorizations are subject to appeals or administrative protests, resulting in the potential for litigation that could lead to administrative reconsiderations or reversals of permitting decisions. Appeals and similar litigation processes can cause lengthy delays, with uncertain outcomes. Such issues could impact the expected development timelines of the Company’s projects and have a material adverse effect on our business.
Endangered or threatened species protections may impact the development of the project by subjecting it to time delays, restrictions or mitigation measures. For example, the Center for Biodiversity petitioned both the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services (“FWS”) and the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (“NDCNR”) to require additional protection for Tiehm’s buckwheat, a plant found along the western margin of the Company’s Rhyolite Ridge ore deposit. On June 4, 2021, FWS made a 12 month finding that listing Tiehm's buckwheat under the Endangered Species Act ("ESA") was warranted, and on October 7, 2021, FWS proposed a rule to list Tiehm's buckwheat as an endangered species under the ESA. At that time, FWS indicated that it intended to make a final decision whether to list Tiehm's buckwheat under the ESA within one year. Additionally, FWS announced on February 2, 2022 that it had proposed critical habitat to accompany its proposal to list Tiehm's buckwheat as an endangered species under the ESA. We expect that FWS will issue its final decision regarding Tiehm's buckwheat listing and critical habitat in the near term. The Secretary of Interior can designate critical habitat after taking into consideration the economic impact, the impact on national security and any other relevant impacts. Should Tiehm’s buckwheat be ESA listed, BLM would be obligated to complete an ESA Section 7 Consultation with FWS and obtain a determination from FWS that the proposed mine plan of operations is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of Tiehm’s buckwheat, or cause the destruction or adverse modification of any designated critical habitat for Tiehm’s buckwheat, before BLM could grant its approval. The ESA would also authorize FWS to propose “reasonable and prudent measures” to minimize impact on the plant, which would become conditions of BLM’s approval. The NDCNR process is ongoing.
There is a risk that these and any other habitat protections for endangered and threatened species could compromise the economic viability of future development of the Rhyolite Ridge Project. The Company is currently working with State and Federal regulators on protection and conservation efforts, including submitting a revised mine plan of operations in July 2022 that 1) avoids all direct impact to Tiehm’s buckwheat, 2) minimizes and mitigates indirect impacts using standard operating measures and 3) minimizes disturbances within designated critical habitat.
Our mineral properties consist of unpatented mining claims that may carry certain risks and uncertainties.
Our mineral properties consist of unpatented mining claims which are located on lands administered by the BLM. The United States retains and manages the surface of these lands and the Company holds only possessory title to the minerals and the right to use the surface to extract and process the minerals. Title to unpatented mining claims is subject to inherent uncertainties. These uncertainties relate to such things as the sufficiency of the Company’s discovery of a deposit of valuable minerals as required under the Mining Law of 1972, proper location and posting and marking of boundaries, and possible conflicts with other claims which are not determinable from descriptions of record. The Company has undertaken investigations of the unpatented mining claims that it acquired from third parties and which it located, and is confident that its unpatented mining claims are compliant with federal and state laws. Substantial mineral exploration, development and mining in the western United States occurs on unpatented mining claims, and these uncertainties are inherent in the mining industry.
The present status of our unpatented mining claims located on public lands allows us the right to mine and remove valuable minerals, including lithium and other metals, from the claims conditioned upon applicable environmental reviews and permitting programs. We also are generally allowed to use the surface of the land solely for purposes related to mining and processing the mineral-bearing ores. Legal ownership of the land remains with the United States. We remain at risk that the mining claims may be forfeited either to the United States or to rival private claimants if we fail to comply with statutory requirements, including payment of the federal annual mining claim maintenance fees which presently are US$165.00 for each unpatented mining claim.
Before 1994, a mining claim locator who was able to prove the discovery of valuable, locatable minerals on an unpatented mining claim, and to meet all other applicable federal and state requirements and procedures pertaining to the location and maintenance of the unpatented mining claim, had the right to prosecute a patent application to secure fee title to the mining claim from the federal government. The right to pursue a patent, however, has been subject to a moratorium since October 1994, through federal legislation restricting the BLM from accepting any new mineral patent applications. If we do not obtain fee title to our unpatented mining claims, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to obtain compensation in connection with an action by BLM to contest or condemn our claims.
Legislation has been proposed periodically that could, if enacted, significantly affect the cost of our operations on our unpatented mining claims or the amount of net proceeds of mineral tax we will pay to the State of Nevada on the commencement of production of minerals from the Rhyolite Ridge Project.
Members of the U.S. Congress have periodically introduced bills which would supplant or alter the provisions of the Mining Law of 1872. Such bills have proposed, among other things, to impose a federal royalty on production from unpatented mining claims. Such proposed legislation could change the cost of holding unpatented mining claims and could significantly impact our ability to develop mineralized material on unpatented mining claims. Our mining claims are unpatented claims. Although we cannot predict what legislated royalties might be, the enactment of these proposed bills could adversely affect the potential for development of our unpatented mining claims and the economics of our existing operating mines on federal unpatented mining claims. Passage of such legislation could adversely affect our financial performance and results of operations.
We are subject to net proceeds of mineral tax payable to the State of Nevada on up to 5% of net proceeds generated the Rhyolite Ridge Project. Net proceeds are calculated as the excess of gross yield over certain direct costs. Gross yield is determined as the value received when minerals are sold, exchanged for anything of value or removed from the state. Direct costs generally include the costs to develop, extract, produce, transport and refine minerals. From time to time Nevada legislators introduce bills which aim to increase the amount of net proceeds of minerals tax which Nevada mining companies pay.
Regulatory and Industry Risks
The Project will be subject to significant governmental regulations, including the U.S. Federal Mine Safety and Health Act and the Endangered Species Act.
Mining activities in the United States are generally subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations governing environmental and endangered species protection, natural resources, prospecting, development, production, post-closure reclamation, taxes, labor standards and occupational health and safety laws and regulations, including mine safety, toxic substances and other matters. The costs associated with compliance with such laws and regulations are substantial. In addition, changes in such laws and regulations, or more restrictive interpretations of current laws and regulations by governmental authorities, could result in unanticipated capital expenditures, expenses or restrictions on or suspensions of our operations and delays in the development of our properties.
We must obtain and renew governmental permits in order to develop our mining operations, a process which is often costly and time-consuming.
We are required to obtain and renew the licenses, permits, rights-of-way and regulatory consents necessary for our development and exploration activities. Obtaining and renewing these licenses, permits, rights-of-way and regulatory consents is a complex and time-consuming process. The timeliness and success of permitting efforts are contingent upon many variables not within our control, including the interpretation of approval requirements administered by the applicable authority. We may not be able to obtain or renew licenses, permits and regulatory consents that are necessary to our planned operations or the cost and time required to obtain or renew such licenses, permits and regulatory consents may exceed our expectations. Further, we may not be able to maintains our existing licenses, permits and regulatory consents in full force and effect without modification or revocation adverse to our interests. Any unexpected delays or costs associated with the permitting process could delay the development, exploration or operation of our properties, which in turn could materially adversely affect our future revenues and profitability. In addition, key licenses, permits and regulatory consents may be revoked or suspended or may be changed in a manner that adversely affects our activities.
Private parties, such as environmental activists, frequently attempt to intervene in the approval process and to persuade regulators to deny necessary licenses, permits and regulatory consents or seek to overturn those that have been issued. Obtaining the necessary governmental licenses, permits and regulatory consents involves numerous jurisdictions, public hearings and possibly costly undertakings. These third-party actions can materially increase the costs and cause delays in the process and could cause us to not proceed with the development or operation of a property. In addition, our ability to successfully obtain key permits and approvals to develop, explore, operate and expand operations will likely depend on our ability to undertake such activities in a manner consistent with the creation of social and economic benefits in the surrounding communities, which may or may not be required by law. Our ability to obtain permits and approvals and to successfully operate in particular communities may be adversely affected by real or perceived detrimental events associated with our activities.
Compliance with environmental regulations and litigation based on environmental regulations could require significant expenditures, and the physical effects of climate change could have an adverse effect on our operations.
Environmental regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, land development and land reclamation, and set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner that may require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for mining companies and their officers, directors and employees. New environmental laws and regulations or changes in existing environmental laws and regulations could have a negative effect on exploration activities, operations, production levels and methods of production. In connection with our current exploration and development activities or in connection with our prior mining operations, we may incur environmental costs that could have a material adverse effect on financial condition and results of operations. Any failure to remedy an environmental problem could require us to suspend operations or enter into interim compliance measures pending completion of the required remedy.
Moreover, governmental authorities and private parties may bring lawsuits based upon damage to property and injury to persons resulting from the environmental, health and safety impacts of prior and current operations. These lawsuits could lead to the imposition of substantial fines, remediation costs, penalties and other civil and criminal sanctions. We cannot assure you that any such law, regulation, enforcement or private claim would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Mining companies may also be held responsible for the costs of addressing contamination at the site of current or former activities or at third party sites. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and its state law equivalents, present or past owners of a property may be held jointly and severally liable for cleanup costs or forced to undertake remedial actions in response to unpermitted releases of hazardous substances at such property, in addition to, among other potential consequences, potential liability to governmental entities for the cost of damages to natural resources, which may be substantial.
Environmental regulations require us to obtain various operating permits, approvals and licenses and also impose standards and controls relating to development and production activities—see above. For example, FWS may designate critical habitat areas it believes are necessary for survival of a threatened or endangered species. FWS announced on February 2, 2022 that it had proposed critical habitat to accompany its proposal to list Tiehm's buckwheat as an endangered species under the ESA. A critical habitat designation could result in further material restrictions to land use and may materially delay or prohibit land access for our development. Failure to obtain necessary permits or authorizations required under environmental regulations could also result in delays in beginning or expanding operations, incurring additional costs for investigation or cleanup of hazardous substances, litigation, payment of penalties for non-compliance or discharge of pollutants, and post-mining closure, reclamation and bonding, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our financial performance, results of operations and liquidity.
We cannot predict at this time what changes, if any, to federal laws or regulations may be adopted or imposed by Congress and the new Biden Administration. We cannot provide any assurance that future changes in environmental laws and regulations will not adversely affect our current operations or future projects. Any changes to these laws and regulations could have an adverse impact on our financial performance and results of operations by, for example, requiring changes to operating constraints, technical criteria, fees or financial assurance requirements.
Congress has from time to time considered adopting legislation to reduce emissions of greenhouse gas emissions (“GHGs”), and a number of state and regional efforts have emerged that are aimed at tracking and/or reducing GHG emissions by means of cap and trade programs. Cap and trade programs typically require major sources of GHG emissions to acquire and surrender emission allowances in return for emitting those GHGs. Further, the United States has rejoined the Paris Agreement and has committed to reduce U.S. GHG emissions by up to 52% by 2030. Various states and local governments such as Nevada’s have also vowed to continue to enact regulations to satisfy their proportionate obligations under the Paris Agreement. The adoption of legislation or regulatory programs or other government action to reduce emissions of GHGs could require us to incur increased operating costs. Finally, some scientists have concluded that increasing concentrations of GHGs in the earth’s atmosphere may produce climate changes that could have significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, droughts, and floods and other climatic events; if such effects were to occur, they could have an adverse impact on our operations.
Lithium and boron prices are subject to unpredictable fluctuations.
We currently expect to derive revenues, if any, principally from the sale of refined lithium and boron compounds. The price of these materials may fluctuate widely and is affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including international, economic and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency exchange fluctuations, interest rates, global or regional consumptive patterns, speculative activities, increased production due to new extraction developments and improved extraction and production methods and technological changes in the markets for the end products. The effect of these factors on prices, and therefore the economic viability of any of our properties, cannot accurately be predicted.
Changes in technology or other developments could result in preferences for substitute products.
Lithium, boron and their derivatives are preferred raw materials for certain industrial applications, such as lithium-ion batteries. Many materials and technologies are being researched and developed with the goal of making batteries lighter, more efficient, faster charging and less expensive. Some of these technologies could be successful and could adversely affect demand for lithium batteries in personal electronics, electric and hybrid vehicles and other applications. We cannot predict which new technologies may ultimately prove to be commercially viable and on what time horizon. In addition, alternatives to such products may become more economically attractive as global commodity prices shift. Any of these events could adversely affect demand for and market prices of lithium, thereby resulting in a material adverse effect on the economic feasibility of extracting any mineralization we discover and reducing or eliminating any reserves we identify.
New production of lithium from current or new competitors in the lithium markets could adversely affect prices.
In recent years, new and existing competitors have increased the supply of lithium, which has affected its price. Further production increases could negatively affect prices. There is limited information on the status of new lithium production capacity expansion projects being developed by current and potential competitors and, as such, we cannot make accurate projections regarding the capacities of possible new entrants into the market and the dates on which they could become operational. If these potential projects are completed in the short term, they could adversely affect market lithium prices, thereby resulting in a material adverse effect on the economic feasibility of extracting any mineralization we discover and reducing or eliminating any reserves we identify.
Risks Related to an Investment in the ADSs
ADSs holders may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to claims arising under the deposit agreement, which could result in less favorable outcomes to the plaintiffs in any such action.
The deposit agreement governing the ADSs provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, ADS holders waive the right to a jury trial of any claim they may have against us or the depositary arising out of or relating to our ordinary shares, the ADSs or the deposit agreement, including any claim under the U.S. federal securities laws. The waiver of jury trial provision applies to all holders of ADSs, including purchasers who acquire ADSs on the open market. If we or the depositary opposed a jury trial demand based on the waiver, the court would determine whether the waiver was enforceable based on the facts and circumstances of that case in accordance with the applicable state and federal law. To our knowledge, the enforceability of a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver in connection with claims arising under the federal securities laws has not been finally adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court. However, we believe that a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision is generally enforceable, including under the laws of the State of New York, which govern the deposit agreement, by a federal or state court in the City of New York, which has non-exclusive jurisdiction over matters arising under the deposit agreement. In determining whether to enforce a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision, courts will generally consider whether a party knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to a jury trial. We believe that this is the case with respect to the deposit agreement and the ADSs. In addition, New York courts will not enforce a jury trial waiver provision in order to bar a viable setoff or counterclaim sounding in fraud or one which is based upon a creditor’s negligence in failing to liquidate collateral upon a guarantor’s demand, or in the case of an intentional tort claim (as opposed to a contract dispute), none of which we believe are applicable in the case of the deposit agreement or the ADSs. It is advisable that you consult legal counsel regarding the jury waiver provision before entering obtaining ADSs.
If you or any other holder of ADSs bring a claim against us or the depositary in connection with matters arising under the deposit agreement or the ADSs, including claims under federal securities laws, you or such other holder may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to such claims, which may have the effect of limiting and discouraging lawsuits against us and/or the depositary. If a lawsuit is brought against us or the depositary under the deposit agreement, it may be heard only by a judge of the applicable trial court, which would be conducted according to different civil procedures and may result in different outcomes than a trial by jury would have had, including results that could be less favorable to the plaintiffs in any such action.
Nevertheless, if this jury trial waiver provision is not permitted by applicable law, an action could proceed under the terms of the deposit agreement with a jury trial.
Limitations in the deposit agreement may not be effective to waive claims against the Company based on compliance with the federal securities laws.
Although the deposit agreement provides a waiver of jury trial as described above, we have been advised that no condition, stipulation or provision of the deposit agreement or ADSs can serve as a waiver by any owner or holder of ADSs or by us or the depositary of compliance with any substantive provision of the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Accordingly, we expect to be subject to a jury trial in actions based on such laws, rules and regulations.
The market price and trading volume of the ADSs may be volatile and may be affected by economic conditions beyond our control.
The market price of the ADSs may be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume of the ADSs may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. If the market price of the ADSs declines significantly, you may be unable to resell the ADSs at or above the purchase price, if at all. We cannot assure you that the market price of the ADSs will not fluctuate or significantly decline in the future.
Some specific factors that could negatively affect the price of the ADSs or result in fluctuations in their price and trading volume include:
• | changes or delays in development or exploration activities; |
• | actual or expected fluctuations in our prospects or operating results; |
• | changes in the demand for, or market prices of, lithium or boron; |
• | additions to or departures of our key personnel; |
• | fluctuations of exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Australian dollar; |
• | changes or proposed changes in laws and regulations; |
• | changes in trading volume of ADSs on Nasdaq and of our ordinary shares on the ASX; |
• | sales or perceived potential sales of the ADSs or ordinary shares by us, our directors, senior management or our shareholders in the future; |
• | announcement or expectation of additional financing efforts; and |
• | conditions in the U.S. or Australian financial markets or changes in general economic conditions. |
An active trading market for the ADSs may not be maintained, and the trading price for our ordinary shares may fluctuate significantly.
We listed our ADSs on Nasdaq in June 2022, and we cannot assure you that an active public market for the ADSs will be maintained. If an active public market for the ADSs is not maintained, the market price and liquidity of the ADSs may be adversely affected, and you may experience a decrease in the value of the ADSs regardless of our operating performance. We are aware that following past periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, shareholders of those companies have often instituted securities class action litigations. If we were to become involved in a class action suit, it could divert the attention of senior management and, if adversely determined, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
ADS holders are not our shareholders and do not have shareholder rights.
The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary, registers and delivers the ADSs. ADS holders are not treated as our shareholders and do not have shareholders rights. The depositary is the holder of our ordinary shares underlying the ADSs. Holders of ADSs have ADS holder rights. A deposit agreement among us, the depositary, ADS holders, and the beneficial owners of ADSs, sets out ADS holder rights as well as the rights and obligations of the depositary. New York law governs the deposit agreement and the ADSs. We and the depositary may amend or terminate the deposit agreement without the ADS holders’ consent in a manner that could prejudice ADS holders. For a description of ADS holder rights, see “Additional Information—Constitutional Documents—Description of Share Capital—American Depositary Shares.” Our shareholders have shareholder rights. Australian law and our Constitution govern shareholder rights.
ADS holders do not have the same voting rights as our shareholders. Shareholders are entitled to receive our notices of general meetings and to attend and vote at our general meetings of shareholders. At a general meeting, every shareholder present (in person or by proxy, attorney or representative) and entitled to vote has one vote on a show of hands. Every shareholder present (in person or by proxy, attorney or representative) and entitled to vote has one vote per fully paid ordinary share on a poll. This is subject to any other rights or restrictions that may be attached to any shares. ADS holders may instruct the depositary to vote the ordinary shares underlying their ADSs. ADS holders will not be entitled to attend and vote at a general meeting unless they surrender their ADSs and withdraw the ordinary shares. However, ADS holders may not have sufficient advance notice about the meeting to surrender their ADSs and withdraw the shares. If we ask for ADS holders’ instructions, the depositary will notify ADS holders of the upcoming vote and arrange to deliver our voting materials and form of notice to them. If we ask the depositary to solicit voting instructions, the depositary will try, as far as practical, subject to Australian law and the provisions of the depositary agreement, to vote the shares as ADS holders instruct. The depositary will not vote or attempt to exercise the right to vote other than in accordance with the instructions of ADS holders. We cannot assure ADS holders that they will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that they can instruct the depositary to vote their shares. In addition, there may be other circumstances in which ADS holders may not be able to exercise voting rights.
ADS holders do not have the same rights to receive dividends or other distributions as our shareholders. Subject to any special rights or restrictions attached to any shares, the directors may determine that a dividend will be payable on our ordinary shares and fix the amount, the time for payment and the method for payment (although we have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our ordinary shares and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future). Dividends may be paid on our ordinary shares of one class but not another and at different rates for different classes. Dividends and other distributions payable to our shareholders with respect to our ordinary shares generally will be payable directly to them. Any dividends or distributions payable with respect to ordinary shares represented by ADSs will be paid to the depositary, which has agreed to pay to ADS holders the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on shares or other deposited securities, after deducting its fees and expenses. Before the depositary makes a distribution to you in respect of your ADSs, any withholding taxes that must be paid will be deducted. Additionally, if the exchange rate fluctuates during a time when the ADS depositary cannot convert the foreign currency, you may lose some or all of the value of the distribution. ADS holders will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of ordinary shares their ADSs represent. In addition, there may be certain circumstances in which the depositary may not pay to ADS holders amounts distributed by us as a dividend or distribution.
There are circumstances where it may be unlawful or impractical to make distributions to the holders of the ADSs.
The deposit agreement requires the depositary to convert foreign currency distributions it receives on deposited ordinary shares into U.S. dollars and distribute the net U.S. dollars to ADS holders if it can do so on a reasonable basis and transfer the money to the United States. If it cannot make that conversion and transfer, the deposit agreement allows the depositary to distribute the foreign currency only to those ADS holders to whom it is possible to do so. If a distribution is payable by us in Australian dollars, the depositary will hold the foreign currency it cannot convert for the account of ADS holders who have not been paid. It will not invest the foreign currency and it will not be liable for any interest. If the exchange rates fluctuate during a time when the depositary cannot convert the foreign currency, ADS holders may lose some of the value of the distribution. The depositary is not responsible if it decides that it is unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to any ADS holders. This means that ADS holders may not receive the distributions we make on our ordinary shares or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical for us to make them available to them.
Rights as a holder of ordinary shares are governed by Australian law and our Constitution and differ from the rights of shareholders under U.S. law. Holders of the ADSs may have difficulty in effecting service of process in the United States or enforcing judgments obtained in the United States.
We are a public company incorporated under the laws of Australia. Therefore, the rights of holders of our ordinary shares are governed by Australian law and our Constitution. These rights differ from the typical rights of shareholders in U.S. corporations. The rights of holders of ADSs are affected by Australian law and our Constitution but are governed by U.S. law. Circumstances that under U.S. law may entitle a shareholder in a U.S. company to claim damages may also give rise to a cause of action under Australian law entitling a shareholder in an Australian company to claim damages. However, this will not always be the case.
Holders of the ADSs may have difficulties enforcing, in actions brought in courts in jurisdictions located outside the United States, liabilities under U.S. securities laws. In particular, if such a holder sought to bring proceedings in Australia based on U.S. securities laws, the Australian court might consider whether:
• | it did not have jurisdiction; |
• | it was not an appropriate forum for such proceedings; |
• | applying Australian conflict of laws rule, U.S. law (including U.S. securities laws) did not apply to the relationship between holders of our ordinary shares or ADSs and us or our directors and officers; or |
• | the U.S. securities laws were of a public or penal nature and should not be enforced by the Australian court. |
Certain of our directors and executive officers are residents of countries other than the United States. Furthermore, a portion of our and their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for a holder of our ordinary shares or ADSs to:
• | effect service of process within the United States upon certain directors and executive officers or on us; |
• | enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained against any of our directors and executive officers or us in the U.S. courts in any action, including actions under the civil liability provisions of U.S. securities laws; |
• | enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained against any of our directors and senior management or us in courts of jurisdictions outside the United States in any action, including actions under the civil liability provisions of U.S. securities laws; or |
• | bring an original action in an Australian court to enforce liabilities against any of our directors and executive officers or us based upon U.S. securities laws. |
Holders of our ordinary shares and the ADSs may also have difficulties enforcing in courts outside the U.S. judgments obtained in the U.S. courts against any of our directors and executive officers or us, including actions under the civil liability provisions of the U.S. securities laws.
The dual listing of our ordinary shares and the ADSs may adversely affect the liquidity and value of the ADSs.
Our ordinary shares are listed on the ASX. We cannot predict how the dual listing of our ordinary shares on ASX and our ADSs on Nasdaq will effect the value of these securities. Dual listing may dilute the liquidity in one or both markets and may adversely affect the development of an active trading market for the ADSs in the United States.
Currency fluctuations may adversely affect the price of the ADSs relative to the price of our ordinary shares.
The price of our ordinary shares is quoted in Australian dollars and the price of the ADSs is quoted in U.S. dollars. Movements in the Australian dollar/U.S. dollar exchange rate may adversely affect the U.S. dollar price of the ADSs and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the price of our ordinary shares. If the Australian dollar weakens against the U.S. dollar, the U.S. dollar price of the ADSs could decline, even if the price of our ordinary shares in Australian dollars increases or remains unchanged. If we pay dividends, we will likely calculate and pay any cash dividends in Australian dollars and, as a result, exchange rate movements will affect the U.S. dollar amount of any dividends holders of the ADSs will receive from the depositary.
As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted and expect to follow certain home country corporate governance practices in lieu of certain Nasdaq requirements applicable to domestic issuers.
As a foreign private issuer listed on Nasdaq, we will be permitted to, and intend to, follow certain home country corporate governance practices in lieu of certain Nasdaq practices. In particular, we follow home country law instead of Nasdaq practice regarding: (i) the requirement that a majority of the board of directors be independent; (ii) the establishment of independent committees to oversee compensation matters and director nominations; (iii) the requirement that we obtain shareholder approval for certain dilutive events, such as an issuance that may result in a change of control of the company, certain transactions other than a public offering involving issuances of a 20% or more interest in the company and certain acquisitions of the stock or assets of another company; and (iv) the requirement to have at least annual meetings of independent directors in executive sessions. See “Item 16G. Corporate Governance” for additional information with respect to these differences.
As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to file less information with the SEC than a company that files as a domestic issuer.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from certain rules under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that impose disclosure requirements as well as procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as a company that files as a domestic issuer whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act, nor are we generally required to comply with the SEC’s Regulation FD, which restricts the selective disclosure of material non-public information.
Under Australian law, we prepare financial statements on an annual and semi-annual basis, we are not required to prepare or file quarterly financial information other than quarterly updates. Our quarterly updates have consisted of a brief review of operations for the quarter together with a statement of cash expenditure during the quarter, the cash and cash equivalents balance as at the end of the quarter and estimated cash outflows for the following quarter.
For as long as we are a “foreign private issuer,” we intend to file our annual financial statements on Form 20-F and furnish our semi-annual financial statements and quarterly updates on Form 6-K to the SEC as long as we are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. However, the information we file or furnish is not the same as the information that is required in annual and quarterly reports on Form 10-K or Form 10-Q for U.S. domestic issuers. Accordingly, there may be less information publicly available concerning us than there is for a company that files as a U.S. issuer.
We may lose our foreign private issuer status, which would then require us to comply with the Exchange Act’s domestic reporting regime and cause us to incur additional legal, accounting and other expenses.
We are required to determine our status as a foreign private issuer on an annual basis at the end of our second fiscal quarter. We would cease to be a foreign private issuer at such time as more than 50% of our outstanding voting securities are held by U.S. residents and any of the following three circumstances applies: (1) the majority of our executive officers or directors are U.S. citizens or residents; (2) more than 50% of our assets are located in the United States; or (3) our business is administered principally in the United States. Since more than 50% of our assets are located in the United States, we will lose our status as a foreign private issuer if more than 50% of our outstanding voting securities are held by U.S. residents as of the last day of our second fiscal quarter in any year. If we lost this status, we would be required to comply with the Exchange Act reporting and other requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, which are more detailed and extensive than the requirements for foreign private issuers. We may also be required to make changes in our corporate governance practices and to comply with United States generally accepted accounting principles, as opposed to IFRS. The regulatory and compliance costs to us under U.S. securities laws if we are required to comply with the reporting requirements applicable to a U.S. domestic issuer may be higher than the cost we would incur as a foreign private issuer. As a result, we expect that a loss of foreign private issuer status would increase our legal and financial compliance costs.
We are an emerging growth company, and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make the ADSs less attractive to investors and, as a result, adversely affect the price of the ADSs and result in a less active trading market for the ADSs.
We are an emerging growth company as defined in the U.S. Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. For example, we have elected to rely on an exemption from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act relating to internal control over financial reporting, and we will not provide such an attestation from our auditors.
We may avail ourselves of these disclosure exemptions until we are no longer an emerging growth company. We cannot predict whether investors will find the ADSs less attractive because of our reliance on some or all of these exemptions. If investors find the ADSs less attractive, it may adversely affect the price of the ADSs and there may be a less active trading market for the ADSs.
We will cease to be an emerging growth company upon the earliest of:
• | the last day of the fiscal year during which we have total annual gross revenues of US$1,235,000,000 (as such amount is indexed for inflation every five years by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC) or more; |
• | the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our first sale of common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act; |
• | the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than US$1,000,000,000 in non-convertible debt; or |
• | the date on which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer”, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, which would occur in future fiscal years if the market value of our ordinary shares and ADSs that are held by non-affiliates exceeds US$700,000,000 as of the last day of our most recently-completed second fiscal quarter. |
We will incur significant increased costs as a result of operating as a company whose ADSs are publicly traded in the United States, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.
As a company whose ADSs will be publicly traded in the United States, we will incur significant legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses that we did not previously incur. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and related rules implemented by the SEC, have imposed various requirements on public companies including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and internal controls. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives, and we will need to add additional personnel and build our internal compliance infrastructure. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. These laws and regulations could also make it more difficult and expensive for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as our senior management. Furthermore, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations as a public company in the United States, we could be subject to delisting of the ADSs, fines, sanctions and other regulatory action and potentially civil litigation.
We do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.
We do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance the development of our business. Dividends, if any, on our outstanding ordinary shares will be declared by and subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors on the basis of our earnings, financial requirements and other relevant factors, and subject to Australian law. As a result, a return on your investment will only occur if the ADS price appreciates. We cannot assure you that the ADSs will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which you purchase the ADSs. You may not realize a return on your investment in the ADSs and you may even lose your entire investment in the ADSs.
If U.S. securities or industry analysts do not publish research reports about our business, or if they issue an adverse opinion about our business, the market price and trading volume of our ordinary shares or ADSs could decline.
The trading market for our ordinary shares and ADSs will be influenced by the research and reports that U.S. securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. Securities and industry analysts may discontinue research on us, to the extent such coverage currently exists, or in other cases, may never publish research on us. If no or too few U.S. securities or industry analysts commence coverage of our Company, the trading price for the ADSs would likely be negatively affected. In the event securities or industry analysts initiate coverage, if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade the ADSs or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the market price of the ADSs would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for the ADSs could decrease, which might cause our price and trading volume to decline. In addition, research and reports that Australian securities or industry analysts publish about us, our business or our ordinary shares may impact the market price of the ADSs.
You may be subject to limitations on transfers of the ADSs.
The ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its transfer books at any time or from time to time when it deems expedient in connection with the performance of its duties. In addition, the depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of ADSs generally when our books or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary deems it advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason.
Our Constitution and Australian laws and regulations applicable to us may adversely affect our ability to take actions that could be beneficial to our shareholders.
As an Australian company we are subject to different corporate requirements than a corporation organized under the laws of the United States. Our Constitution, as well as the Australian Corporations Act, set forth various rights and obligations that are unique to us as an Australian company. These requirements may operate differently than those of many U.S. companies. You should carefully review the summary of these matters set forth under the section entitled “Additional Information—Share Capital” as well as our Constitution, which is included as an exhibit to this registration on Form 20-F, prior to investing in the ADSs.
If we fail to maintain proper internal controls, our ability to produce accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.
We are subject to the reporting obligations under the U.S. securities laws. The SEC, as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, has adopted rules requiring a public company to include a report of management on the effectiveness of such company’s internal control over financial reporting in its annual report on Form 20-F. In addition, once we cease to be an “emerging growth company,” as such term is defined in the JOBS Act, an independent registered public accounting firm for a public company must issue an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If in the future we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting or our independent auditors are unwilling or unable to provide us with an unqualified report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, investors may lose confidence in our operating results, the price of the ADSs could decline and we may be subject to litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. In addition, if we are unable to meet the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we may not be able to remain listed on Nasdaq.
We believe that we were a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes for the taxable year ended June 30, 2022, and we expect to be a passive foreign investment company for the taxable year ending June 30, 2023, which could have adverse tax consequences for our investors.
The rules governing PFICs can have adverse consequences for U.S. investors for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), we will be a PFIC for any taxable year in which, after the application of certain “look-through” rules with respect to our subsidiaries, either (i) 75% or more of our gross income consists of “passive income,” or (ii) 50% or more of the average quarterly value of our assets consist of assets that produce, or are held for the production of, “passive income.” Passive income generally includes interest, dividends, rents, certain non-active royalties and capital gains. As discussed in “Taxation—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Certain Tax Consequences If We Are a PFIC,” we believe that we were a PFIC for the taxable year ended June 30, 2022 because we did not have active business income in that taxable year, and we expect to be a PFIC for the current taxable year ending June 30, 2023 because we do not expect to begin active business operations in the current taxable year.
If we are characterized as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder (as defined in “Taxation—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations”) holds ADSs or ordinary shares, we generally would continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to that U.S. Holder for all succeeding years during which the U.S. Holder holds ADSs or ordinary shares, even if we ceased to meet the threshold requirements for PFIC status. Such a U.S. Holder may suffer adverse tax consequences, including ineligibility for any preferential tax rates on capital gains or on actual or deemed dividends, interest charges on certain taxes treated as deferred and additional reporting requirements under U.S. federal income tax laws and regulations. A U.S. Holder may, in certain circumstances, make a timely qualified electing fund (“QEF”) election or a mark-to-market election to avoid or minimize the adverse tax consequences described above. We do not, however, expect to provide the information regarding our income that would be necessary in order for a U.S. Holder to make a QEF election. Potential investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding all aspects of the application of the PFIC rules to the ADSs and ordinary shares.
Our internal controls over financial reporting do not currently meet all of the standards contemplated by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 could have a material adverse effect on our business and the price of our ordinary shares.
We are not currently required to comply with the rules of the SEC implementing Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and therefore we and our independent registered public accounting firm were not required to, and did not, make a formal assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for that purpose. We will not be required to make our first annual assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 until the year following our first annual report required to be filed with the SEC, being the annual report for the year ended June 30, 2023. As an emerging growth company, our independent registered public accounting firm will generally not be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 until we are no longer an emerging growth company (but in no case earlier than the year following our first annual report required to be filed with the SEC). If we cease to be an emerging growth company, we will be required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which will require management to certify financial and other information in our SEC reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of control over financial reporting. If we are unable to complete our initial assessment of internal controls and otherwise implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, our independent registered public accounting firm may not be able to certify as to the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting. Our management has not completed an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and our independent registered public accounting firm has not conducted an audit of our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 4. | INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY |
A. | History and Development of the Company |
Overview
ioneer Ltd’s primary business is developing a lithium-boron mine and processing facility, known as the Rhyolite Ridge Project, in Esmeralda County, Nevada, United States. The Project is located on public land administered by the BLM of the U.S. Department of Interior. ioneer Ltd. currently holds a 100% interest in the project; however, under the terms of the Joint Venture with Sibanye-Stillwater, if certain conditions are met and Sibanye-Stillwater makes its US$490 million equity contribution, ioneer will operate and hold a 50% interest in the Project.
The SEC maintains an internet site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
History
Several previous drilling and exploration projects have occurred at or near the project site, with the earliest known boron exploration beginning in the 1890s. Major exploration activities at the site have included:
• | Stauffer Chemicals drilling boreholes in the vicinity more than 50 years ago. |
• | U.S. Borax drilled 16 holes on the Cave Spring property between 1987 and 1992 and excavated and sampled numerous trenches. U.S. Borax held claims until sometime after 2000, at which time the property was released by U.S. Borax and acquired by Gold Summit Corp. |
• | In 2003, our predecessor, Global Geoscience Limited, began exploratory operations in Nevada under the leadership of our current Managing Director, Bernard Rowe. |
• | In 2010 and 2011, JOGMEC-American Lithium, after acquiring the property from Gold Summit, resampled existing trenches and drilled a total of 21 diamond core HQ-sized core holes (approximately 16,850 feet) as well as 15 reverse circulation (RC) rotary percussion holes (approximately 12,000 feet) in the South Basin, for a total of nearly 29,000 feet of drilling. |
• | In 2015, Boundary Peak Minerals acquired mineral rights to the property prior to its transfer to us in 2016. |
ioneer’s history at Rhyolite Ridge has included:
• | In 2016, we acquired our initial interest in the Rhyolite Ridge Project under a Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with Boundary Peak Minerals dated June 3, 2016. We exercised our option to purchase and acquired title to the unpatented mining claims. |
• | During 2016 and 2017, we drilled an additional 28 RC holes (17,330 feet) and 3 diamond HQ core holes (about 2,800 feet) at the property, for a total of over 20,000 feet of drilling. |
• | During 2017 and 2018, we performed all payment obligations under the mining lease. |
• | In October 2018, we completed a Prefeasibility Study (PFS). |
• | During 2018 and 2019, we commissioned additional infill drilling to further define the lithium-boron resource at the site, collecting and testing approximately 29,000 feet of additional core and installing one test well, three monitoring wells, and five vibrating wire piezometers. In addition, we signed our first binding offtake agreement for boron. |
• | In 2020, we completed a definitive feasibility study which affirmed the Project’s scale, long life and potential to become a low-cost and globally significant producer of both lithium and boron products. |
• | During 2021, we announced our first lithium offtake agreement and continued to advance engineering, funding discussions and project permitting. |
• | In September 2021, we agreed to enter into the Strategic Partnership with Sibanye-Stillwater to develop the Rhyolite Ridge Project. Under the terms of the agreement, subject to the satisfaction of conditions precedent, Sibanye-Stillwater will contribute US$490 million for a 50% interest in the Joint Venture holding the project, with ioneer maintaining a 50% interest and retaining operatorship. |
• | In October 2021, the Company completed a US$70 million strategic investment by Sibanye-Stillwater. |
• | In February 2022, we announced that EcoPro Group, a major Korean battery manufacturer had increased its 3-year lithium offtake volume to 7,000 tpa. |
• | In June 2022, our ADSs were listed and commenced trading on Nasdaq. |
• | In July 2022, we agreed a binding 5-year offtake agreement with the Ford Motor Company for 7,000 tpa of lithium carbonate. |
• | In August 2022, we announced a binding 5-year offtake agreement with Prime Planet Energy & Solutions, Inc. (“PPES”), a joint venture between Toyota Motor Corporation and Panasonic Corporation, for 4,000 tpa of lithium carbonate. |
Following the completion of all permitting activities, pre-construction engineering works, offtake agreements for lithium and boron and funding discussions, we intend to undertake mining and processing activities to become a U.S. source of lithium and boron.
Location of the Rhyolite Ridge Project in Nevada
Our U.S. office is located at 9460 Double R. Blvd, Suite 200, Reno, Nevada 89521. Our corporate office is located at Suite 5.03, Level 5, 140 Arthur Street North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia. The telephone number of our U.S. office is +1 (775) 382-4800 and the telephone number of our corporate office is +61 (2) 9922-5800.
Our ordinary shares are publicly traded on the Australian Securities Exchange, or ASX, under the symbol “INR”.
Our ADSs, each representing 40 of our ordinary shares, are listed on Nasdaq under the symbol “IONR”. The Bank of New York Mellon acts as depositary for the ADSs.
We also maintain a web site at www.ioneer.com and therhyoliteridgeproject.com. The information contained on our website or available through our website is not incorporated by reference into and should not be considered a part of this annual report on Form 20-F, and the reference to our website in this annual report on Form 20-F is an inactive textual reference only.
We were originally incorporated on October 26, 2001 as Paradigm Geoscience Pty Ltd. The Company changed its name to Global Geoscience Pty Limited on September 21, 2007 and was listed on the Australian Stock exchange as a public company on December 19, 2007. On October 31, 2018, the Company changed its name to ioneer Ltd.
Strengths
We believe that we are well-positioned to successfully execute our business strategies because of the following competitive strengths:
• | Demonstrated potential to become a world-class lithium-boron producer |
• | DFS confirms plans for a large, long life, low cost operation |
• | Strategically advantageous location in a tier-one mining jurisdiction with easy access to key US and Asian markets |
• | Set to produce two materials essential in a modern world and well-positioned to capitalize on expected electric vehicle demand boom in 2023 and beyond |
• | Completed offtake strategy for both boron and lithium production, and obtained significant equity financing, subject to the satisfaction of conditions precedent, via the Strategic Partnership with Sibanye-Stillwater |
• | Highly experienced board and management with necessary skills to develop, build and operate a world-class lithium-boron mine |
• | Engaged top-tier mining, engineering, processing and environmental partners in Fluor, Golder, Veolia, and SNC Lavalin. |
Development Plans
Subject to market conditions and the ability to define an economically viable project, our business plan for the Project is to become a low-cost and globally significant producer of both lithium and boron products. We plan to effect our business plan by:
• | Complete required permitting and zoning activities. Though we must obtain several permits, there are three key permits necessary before we can begin construction at Rhyolite Ridge, namely: |
| • | a Class II Air Quality Permit from the Nevada State Government (Received in June 2021), |
| • | a Water Pollution Control Permit from the Nevada State Government (Received July 2021); and |
| • | completion of an environmental review and final decision by the federal government authorizing the use of federal land under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). |
• | Undertake discussions with potential offtake parties for future sales of lithium and boron products. |
| • | Lithium – We announced our first lithium offtake agreement on June 30, 2021 with EcoPro, a large Korean battery manufacturer. On February 16, 2022 we announced that EcoPro had exercised an option under the agreement to increase the annual supply volume. Under the agreement, we will deliver 7,000 tonnes per annum (tpa) of lithium carbonate to EcoPro over a three-year term, which we estimate will represent approximately one-third of our projected lithium carbonate production over that period. On July 22, 2022 we announced a five-year binding offtake agreement with the Ford Motor Company for the supply of 7,000 tpa of technical grade lithium carbonate. On August 1, 2022 we announced the signing of a further five-year binding offtake agreement with PPES, a joint venture battery company between Toyota Motor Corporation and Panasonic Corporation. The agreement is for a total of 4,000 tonnes per annum of lithium carbonate from ioneer’s Rhyolite Ridge Lithium-Boron operation in Nevada and represents approximately 19% of annual output in the first five years of production. In total, the three binding offtake agreements account for approximately 87% of our expected first three years of production of lithium carbonate. |
| • | Boron – On December 18, 2019, we announced our first binding offtake agreement for the sale of boric acid to Dalian Jinma Boron Technology Group Co. Ltd (“Jinma”) for 105,000 tpa of boric acid which included a distribution agreement for the territories of China and Taiwan. On May 21, 2020, we announced that we had secured two separate boric acid Distribution and Sales Agreements for the supply of boric acid to Kintamani Resources Pte Limited and Boron Bazar Limited. In aggregate, the volume commitments and minimum volume targets in these agreements place 100% of our first year of projected boric acid production, and more than 85% of boric acid production in years two and three. As with our lithium carbonate agreements, we anticipate entering into offtake and other sales agreements with a variety of partners to build a diversified customer base for our boric acid production. We anticipate that our boric acid production will account for approximately 30% of the Project’s revenue. |
• | Complete pre-construction engineering. This workstream includes progressing engineering from the DFS phase to the start of the Full Notice to Proceed (“FNTP”) phase; also known as the Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Management (“EPCM”) phase. The key aim of ongoing activities is to be construction ready to support construction mobilization following FNTP award. The FNTP award will be dependent on the receipt of all permitting. |
• | Complete required financing activities. The DFS estimated the capital spend to develop the Rhyolite Ridge Project as being US$785 million. We expect to fund this from the following sources: US$490 million of equity contributions from Sibanye-Stillwater to the Joint Venture, debt and existing cash on hand. Sibanye-Stillwater’s obligation to provide its equity contributions is subject to various conditions, including us making an FID regarding the Project, obtaining necessary project permits, and securing debt financing for the Project. The Company has engaged a global investment bank to assist with each of our funding workstreams and is advancing discussions in each area. The Strategic Partnership was announced in September 2021. Debt finance will be dependent on the progress of permitting and offtake discussions, but is advancing. Equity will be sized once the debt discussions are near final. |
• | Complete Construction at the Rhyolite Ridge Project. We will commence construction as soon as all permitting is received, funding is in place and the Company makes an FID to construct the Project. Our best current estimate for starting construction is in the first half of calendar year 2023, the construction period is anticipated to be 24 months, meaning we expect to complete the construction of the mine by the first half of calendar year 2025. |
• | First production by first half of calendar year 2025. We aim to have our first production by the first half of calendar year 2025 (assuming an FID is taken in the first half of calendar year 2023). We anticipate a 6-month period of ramp-up. At this stage we anticipate producing 20,600 tonnes per annum (tpa) of lithium carbonate in the first 3 years of production and 174,400 tpa of boric acid. In year 3, we anticipate installing a lithium hydroxide plant and producing 22,000 tpa of lithium hydroxide from year 4 onwards and 174,400 tpa of boric acid. |
• | Continue our exploration program. Our development of the Rhyolite Ridge Project is situated in the southern basin (the “South Basin”) and all resource and reserve estimates are for the South Basin. Pursuant to our mine plan of operations, we intend to conduct further activities to define additional reserves and resources in the South Basin. We are also currently undertaking technical studies to assess the additional economic potential of the northern basin of Rhyolite Ridge (the “North Basin”) and defining additional reserves and resources. |
Summary Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Data
We are required by ASX Listing Rules to report ore reserves and mineral resources in Australia in compliance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code 2012 Edition) prepared by the Joint Ore Reserves Committee of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia (JORC). In contrast, the SEC generally requires disclosure of mining reserves in accordance with Regulation S-K, Subpart 1300.
The information included in the tables below regarding estimated quantities and quality of our resources and reserves is based on estimates included in the TRS, which is filed as an exhibit to this annual report on Form 20-F.
Mineral Resource Estimate – South Basin Rhyolite Ridge (January 2020)
| Group | | | Classification | | | Short Tons (Mt) | | | Li Grade (ppm) | | | B Grade (ppm) | | | Li2CO3 (wt. %) | | | H3BO3 (wt. %) | | | Li2CO3 (kt) | | | H3BO3 (kt) | |
| Upper Zone M5 Unit | | | Measured | | | 0.5 | | | 2,450 | | | 5,450 | | | 1.3 | | | 3.1 | | | 10 | | | 20 | |
| Indicated | | | 2.0 | | | 1,600 | | | 6,550 | | | 0.9 | | | 3.7 | | | 20 | | | 70 | |
| Inferred | | | 0.0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0.0 | | | 0.0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Total | | | 2.5 | | | 1,750 | | | 6,350 | | | 0.9 | | | 3.6 | | | 30 | | | 90 | |
| Upper Zone B5 Unit | | | Measured | | | 0.0 | | | 1,900 | | | 18,050 | | | 1.0 | | | 10.3 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Indicated | | | 21.0 | | | 1,750 | | | 17,250 | | | 0.9 | | | 9.9 | | | 200 | | | 2,070 | |
| Inferred | | | 9.0 | | | 1,950 | | | 15,000 | | | 1.0 | | | 8.6 | | | 90 | | | 770 | |
| Total | | | 30.0 | | | 1,800 | | | 16,600 | | | 1.0 | | | 9.5 | | | 290 | | | 2,840 | |
| Upper Zone Total | | | Measured | | | 0.5 | | | 1,900 | | | 17,800 | | | 1.0 | | | 10.2 | | | 10 | | | 50 | |
| Indicated | | | 23.0 | | | 1,750 | | | 16,850 | | | 0.9 | | | 9.6 | | | 210 | | | 2,220 | |
| Inferred | | | 9.0 | | | 1,950 | | | 15,000 | | | 1.0 | | | 8.6 | | | 90 | | | 770 | |
| Total | | | 32.5 | | | 1,800 | | | 16,350 | | | 1.0 | | | 9.4 | | | 310 | | | 3,040 | |
| Lower Zone L6 Unit | | | Measured | | | 13.0 | | | 1,350 | | | 7,700 | | | 0.7 | | | 4.4 | | | 90 | | | 570 | |
| Indicated | | | 40.5 | | | 1,400 | | | 11,600 | | | 0.7 | | | 6.6 | | | 300 | | | 2,690 | |
| Inferred | | | 12.5 | | | 1,350 | | | 12,900 | | | 0.7 | | | 7.4 | | | 90 | | | 920 | |
| Total | | | 66.0 | | | 1,400 | | | 11,100 | | | 0.7 | | | 6.3 | | | 480 | | | 4,180 | |
| Total (all zones) | | | Measured | | | 13.5 | | | 1,700 | | | 14,550 | | | 0.9 | | | 8.3 | | | 100 | | | 590 | |
| Indicated | | | 63.5 | | | 1,550 | | | 14,150 | | | 0.8 | | | 8.1 | | | 520 | | | 4,830 | |
| Inferred | | | 21.5 | | | 1,600 | | | 13,800 | | | 0.9 | | | 7.9 | | | 180 | | | 1,690 | |
| Grand Total | | | 98.5 | | | 1,600 | | | 14,150 | | | 0.8 | | | 8.1 | | | 800 | | | 7,110 | |
Notes:
1. | Mineral Resources are reported on a dry in-situ basis and are exclusive of Mineral Reserves. Lithium is converted to lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) using a conversion factor of 5.3228 and boron is converted to boric acid (H3BO3) using a conversion factor of 5.7194. |
2. | The statement of estimates of Mineral Resources has been compiled by Mr. Jerry DeWolfe, who is a full-time employee of Golder Associates (Golder) and a Professional Geologist (P.Geo.) with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (APEGA). Mr. DeWolfe has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that he has undertaken to qualify as a QP as defined in S-K 1300. |
3. | All Mineral Resources figures reported in the table above represent estimates at January 20, 2020. Mineral Resource estimates are not precise calculations, being dependent on the interpretation of limited information on the location, shape and continuity of the occurrence and on the available sampling results. The totals contained in the above table have been rounded to reflect the relative uncertainty of the estimate. Rounding may cause some computational discrepancies. |
4. | Mineral Resources are reported in accordance with Regulation S-K, Subpart 1300. |
5. | The reported Mineral Resource estimate was constrained by a conceptual Mineral Resource optimized quarry shell for the purpose of establishing reasonable prospects of economic extraction based on potential mining, metallurgical and processing grade parameters identified by mining, metallurgical and processing studies performed to date in the previously prepared PFS report on the project. Key inputs in developing the Mineral Resource quarry shell included a 5,000 ppm boron cut-off grade, Mining cost of US$2.42/short ton plus $0.00163/short ton-vertical foot of haulage plant feed processing and grade control costs of US$41.23/short ton of plant feed boron and lithium recovery of 83.5% and 81.8%, respectively; boric acid sales price of US$635/short ton; lithium carbonate sales price of US$9,072/short ton; and sales/transport costs of US$145/short ton of product. |
The Mineral Resource estimates presented in this section are based on the factors related to the geological and grade models presented in section 11.2 of the TRS, and the criteria for reasonable prospects of economic extraction are described in Section 11.3 of the TRS. The Mineral Resource estimates may be affected positively or negatively by additional exploration that expands the geological database and models of lithium-boron mineralization on the project. The Mineral Resource estimates could also be materially affected by any significant changes in the assumptions regarding forecast product prices, mining, and process recoveries, or production costs. If the price assumptions are decreased or the assumed production costs increased significantly, then the cut-off grade must be increased and, if so, the potential impacts on the Mineral Resource estimates would likely be material and need to be re-evaluated.
The Mineral Resource estimates are also based on assumptions that a mining project may be developed, permitted, constructed, and operated at the project. Any material changes in these assumptions would materially and adversely affect the Mineral Resource estimates for the project; potentially reducing to zero. Examples of such material changes include extraordinary time required to complete or perform any required activities, or unexpected and excessive taxation, or regulation of mining activities that become applicable to a proposed mining project on the project. Except as described in this section, the Golder QP does not know of environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, political, or other relevant factors that could materially affect the Mineral Resource estimates.
Mineral Reserve Estimate – Rhyolite Ridge Project
| Area | | | Classification | | | Short Tons2 (Mt) | | | Li Grade3 (ppm) | | | B Grade3 (ppm) | | | Equivalent Grade4 | | | Equivalent Contained Short Tons5 | |
| Li2CO3 (%) | | | H3BO3 (%) | | | Li2CO3 (kt) | | | H3BO3 (kt) | |
| Stage 1 Quarry | | | Proved | | | 12.0 | | | 2,050 | | | 14,950 | | | 1.1 | | | 8.5 | | | 130 | | | 1,030 | |
| Probable | | | 0.0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0.0 | | | 0.0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Total | | | 12.0 | | | 2,050 | | | 14,950 | | | 1.1 | | | 8.5 | | | 130 | | | 1,030 | |
| Stage 2 Quarry | | | Proved | | | 20.0 | | | 1,800 | | | 17,100 | | | 1.0 | | | 9.8 | | | 190 | | | 1,950 | |
| Probable | | | 34.5 | | | 1,700 | | | 14,650 | | | 0.9 | | | 8.4 | | | 310 | | | 2,880 | |
| Total | | | 54.5 | | | 1,750 | | | 15,550 | | | 0.9 | | | 8.9 | | | 500 | | | 4,830 | |
| Stage 1 + 2 Quarry | | | Proved | | | 32.0 | | | 1,900 | | | 16,250 | | | 1.0 | | | 9.3 | | | 320 | | | 2,970 | |
| Probable | | | 34.5 | | | 1,700 | | | 14,650 | | | 0.9 | | | 8.4 | | | 310 | | | 2,880 | |
| Total | | | 66.5 | | | 1,800 | | | 15,400 | | | 1.0 | | | 8.8 | | | 630 | | | 5,850 | |
Notes:
1. | Mt = million short tons; Li = Lithium; B = Boron; ppm = parts per million; Li2CO3 = Lithium Carbonate; H3BO3 = boric acid; kt = thousand tonnes. |
2. | Proven and Probable Reserve Tons have been rounded to the nearest 0.5 Mt. Total Mineral Reserve Tons have been calculated from the unrounded tonnages and rounded to the nearest 0.5Mt. |
3. | Lithium (Li) and Boron (B) grades have been rounded to the nearest 50 parts per million (ppm). |
4. | Equivalent Lithium Carbonate (Li2CO3) and Boric Acid (H3BO3) grades have been rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent. |
5. | Equivalent Contained Lithium Carbonate (Li2CO3) and Boric Acid (H3BO3) tonnages for the Proven and Probable Reserve classifications have been rounded to the nearest 10,000 short tons. Total Contained Tons have been calculated from the unrounded tonnages and rounded to the nearest 10,000 short tons. |
6. | Mineral Reserves reported on a dry basis delivered to the processing plant stockpile. Lithium is converted to equivalent contained tons of lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) using a stochiometric conversion factor of 5.3228, and boron is converted to equivalent contained tons of boric acid (H3BO3) using a stochiometric conversion factor of 5.7194. Equivalent stochiometric conversion factors are derived from the molecular weights of the individual elements which make up Li2CO3 and H3BO3. |
7. | The statement of estimates of Mineral Reserves has been compiled by Mr. Terry Kremmel, who is a full-time employee of Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) and a certified Professional Engineer (PE) in the US and a registered member of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy, & Exploration (SME). Mr. Kremmel has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that he has undertaken to qualify as a QP as defined in Regulation S-K Subpart 1300. |
8. | All Mineral Reserve figures reported in the table above represent estimates at 17 March 2020. The Mineral Reserve estimate is not a precise calculation, being dependent on the interpretation of limited information on the location, shape and continuity of the occurrence and on the available sampling results. The totals contained in the above table have been rounded to reflect the relative uncertainty of the estimate. Mineral Reserves are reported in accordance with the US SEC Regulation S-K Subpart 1300. |
9. | The reported Mineral Reserve estimate was constrained by two designed quarries, referred to as the Stage 1 Quarry and Stage 2 Quarry, and includes diluting materials and allowances for losses. All Proven Reserves were derived from the Measured Mineral Resource classification, and all Probable Reserves were derived from the Indicated Mineral Resource classification only. The results of the Mineral Reserve estimate are supported by the outcomes of an economic analysis completed in support of the April 2020 DFS. The QP is satisfied that the stated Mineral Reserves classification of the deposit appropriately reflects the outcome of the technical and economic studies. |
10. | Key inputs included a 5,000 ppm boron cut-off grade, Mining cost of US$2.07/short ton plus $0.00163/short ton-vertical foot of haulage plant feed processing and grade control costs of US$41.23/ short ton of plant feed boron and lithium recovery of 83.5% and 81.8%, respectively; boric acid sales price of US$635/short ton; lithium carbonate sales price of US$9,072/short ton; and sales/transport costs of US$145/short ton of product. |
U.S. Regulations
We are an “emerging growth company” under the U.S. Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, and will continue to qualify as an “emerging growth company” until the earliest to occur of:
• | the last day of the fiscal year during which we have total annual gross revenues of US$1,235,000,000 (as such amount is indexed for inflation every five years by the SEC) or more; |
• | the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our first sale of common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act; |
• | the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than US$1,000,000,000 in non-convertible debt; or |
• | the date on which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer”, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, which would occur in future fiscal years if the market value of our ordinary shares and ADSs that are held by non-affiliates exceeds US$700,000,000 as of the last day of our most recently-completed second fiscal quarter. |
An emerging growth company may take advantage of specified exemptions from various requirements that are otherwise applicable to public companies in the United States. Generally, a company that registers any class of its securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act is required to include in the second and all subsequent annual reports filed by it under the Exchange Act, a management report on internal control over financial reporting and an auditor attestation report on management’s assessment of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. However, for so long as we continue to qualify as an emerging growth company, we will be exempt from the requirement to include an auditor attestation report in our annual reports filed under the Exchange Act. In addition, Section 103(a)(3) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, has been amended by the JOBS Act, to provide that, among other things, auditors of an emerging growth company are exempt from any rules of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board minimum mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report in which the auditor would be required to provide additional information about the audit and the financial statements of the company.
We are also considered a “foreign private issuer” pursuant to Rule 405 under the Securities Act. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from certain rules under the Exchange Act that impose certain disclosure obligations and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our ordinary shares or ADSs. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as United States companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required to comply with Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure), which restricts the selective disclosure of material information.
Under Australian law, we prepare financial statements on an annual and semi-annual basis, and we are not required to prepare or file quarterly financial information other than quarterly updates. Our quarterly updates consist of a brief review of operations for the quarter together with a statement of cash expenditure during the quarter, the cash and cash equivalents balance as at the end of the quarter and estimated cash outflows for the following quarter.
For as long as we are a “foreign private issuer” we intend to file our annual financial statements on Form 20-F and furnish our semi-annual financial statements and quarterly updates on Form 6-K to the SEC for so long as we are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. However, the information we file or furnish is not the same as the information that is required in annual and quarterly reports on Form 10-K or Form 10-Q for U.S. domestic issuers. Accordingly, there may be less information publicly available concerning us than there is for a company that files as a domestic issuer.
We may take advantage of these exemptions until such time as we are no longer a foreign private issuer. We are required to determine our status as a foreign private issuer on an annual basis at the end of our second fiscal quarter. We would cease to be a foreign private issuer at such time as more than 50% of our outstanding voting securities are held by U.S. residents and any of the following three circumstances applies: (1) the majority of our executive officers or directors are U.S. citizens or residents; (2) more than 50% of our assets are located in the United States; or (3) our business is administered principally in the United States. Since more than 50% of our assets are located in the United States, we will lose our status as a foreign private issuer if more than 50% of our outstanding voting securities are held by U.S. residents as of the last day of our second fiscal quarter in any year. See “Risk Factors— We may lose our foreign private issuer status, which would then require us to comply with the Exchange Act’s domestic reporting regime and cause us to incur additional legal, accounting and other expenses.”
Capital Expenditures
Our capital expenditures for fiscal 2022, 2021 and 2020 amounted to A$46.5 million, A$27.8 million, A$44.4 million, respectively.
Our capital expenditures have historically consisted principally of expenditures on exploration drilling, permitting, PFS engineering, the Rhyolite Ridge pilot plant (the “Pilot Plant”), DFS, vendor engineering and post DFS engineering. We financed these expenditures principally through the issue of new ordinary shares in the Company.
Pilot Plant
The Pilot Plant was constructed and operated in 2019 at Kemetco Research, Inc. (Vancouver, Canada) with additional work continuing in 2020 and 2021. Ioneer spent approximately $6 million on the Pilot Plant project.
The Pilot Plant established all process input and output parameters for the process facility, including but not limited to phase chemistry, throughputs, recovery results, reagent consumption and process equipment forecast efficiencies. The results helped to validate the proposed flow sheet by testing accuracy of the process technology selections, producing technical grade lithium carbonate and producing boric acid. One additional work process included converting lithium carbonate produced at the Pilot Plant into battery grade lithium hydroxide. After consultation with expert consultants and project equipment vendors, we built each separate unit operation to the scale we believed necessary to increase confidence in our ability to operate at a commercial scale.
The Pilot Plant project also was intended to help potential strategic financing partners and customers learn more about us.
Our metallurgical and processing team, along with our broader engineering team, worked with our consultants to incorporate results from the Pilot Plant project into our DFS published in April 2020.
Overview
ioneer Ltd’s primary business is to develop a lithium-boron mine and processing facility, known as the Rhyolite Ridge Project, in Esmeralda County, Nevada, United States. The project is located on public land administered by the BLM of the U.S. Department of Interior. ioneer Ltd. currently holds a 100% interest in the project. Under the terms of the Joint Venture with Sibanye-Stillwater, if certain conditions are met and Sibanye-Stillwater makes its US$490 million equity contribution, Sibanye-Stillwater will acquire a 50% ownership interest in the Joint Venture and ioneer will operate and retain a 50% interest in the Joint Venture.
Marketing
Because we are a development stage company, we do not currently have any marketing or distribution channels or sales agreements. We expect to develop a marketing and sales strategy as we continue our development plan for the Project. We are currently engaged in discussions with multiple potential sales partners and ultimately anticipate that we will have a diverse customer base for the lithium and boron produced at Rhyolite Ridge. To date, we have entered into a lithium binding offtake agreement with a strategic partner that places approximately one-third of our anticipated annual lithium carbonate production over three years. For boric acid, we have entered into one binding offtake and two sales and distribution agreements with committed and minimum target volumes totaling 100% of our expected first year and more than 85% of our expected boric acid production for years two and three. All of the aforementioned agreements are subject to conditions precedent, including the taking of an FID. We expect to enter into additional agreements of the same type in the near term and from time to time. The primary agreements we have entered into as of the date hereof include:
• | Binding lithium offtake supply agreement between the Company and EcoPro Innovation Co. Ltd, a three-year agreement for a total of 7,000 tpa of lithium carbonate, upon commencement of production. |
• | Binding lithium offtake supply agreement between the Company and the Ford Motor Company, a five-year agreement for a total of 7,000 tpa of lithium carbonate, upon commencement of production. |
• | Binding lithium offtake supply agreement between the Company and PPES, a joint venture between Toyota Motor Corporation and Panasonic Corporation, a five-year agreement for a total of 4,000 tpa of lithium carbonate, upon commencement of production. |
• | Binding boric acid offtake agreement between the Company and Dalian Jinma Boron Technology, a five-year agreement for 105,000 tpa of boric acid, upon commencement of production. |
• | Three-year boric acid distribution and sales agreement with Kintamani Resources Pte Limited for certain minimum sales volume targets of boric acid, upon commencement of production. |
• | Three-year boric acid distribution and sales agreement with Boron Bazar Limited for certain minimum sales volume targets of boric acid, upon commencement of production. |
Permitting
We currently have permits authorizing the exploration drilling activities we have conducted with respect to the Project. We are required to obtain governmental permits for our exploration activities and may be required to renew the permits we already have. Prior to developing or mining any mineralization that we discover, we will be required to obtain new governmental permits authorizing, among other things, any mine development activities and mine operating activities. We have obtained two key permits: a Class II Air Quality Permit from the Nevada State Government (Received in June 2021), and a Water Pollution Control Permit from the Nevada State Government (received July 2021). Obtaining and renewing governmental permits is a complex and time-consuming process and involves numerous jurisdictions, public hearings and possibly costly undertakings. The timeliness and success of permitting efforts are contingent upon many variables not within our control, including the interpretation of permit approval requirements administered by the applicable permitting authority. We may not be able to obtain or renew permits that are necessary to our planned operations or the cost and time required to obtain or renew such permits may exceed our expectations. Any unexpected delays or costs associated with the permitting process could delay the exploration, development or operation of our properties.
See “Risk Factors—We must obtain and renew governmental permits in order to develop our mining operations, a process which is often costly and time-consuming.” Please also refer to the Executive Summary of the DFS, available on our website at https://www.ioneer.com/rhyolite-ridge/dfs-summary, for a full list of the permits that are required for us to mine, refine and produce lithium and boron products at Rhyolite Ridge.
Specialized Skills and Knowledge
We rely on specialized skills and knowledge to gather, interpret and process geological and geophysical data, successfully permit and then design, build and operate extraction facilities and numerous additional activities required to extract lithium and boron. We expect to employ a strategy of contracting consultants and other service providers to supplement the skills and knowledge of our permanent staff in order to provide the specialized skills and knowledge to undertake our lithium operations effectively.
Competition
We compete with other mining companies, many of which possess greater financial resources and technical facilities than we do, in connection with the acquisition of suitable exploration properties and in connection with the engagement of qualified personnel. The mining development and exploration industry is fragmented, and we are a very small participant in this sector. Many of our competitors explore for a variety of minerals and control many different properties around the world. Many of them have been in business longer than we have and have established more strategic partnerships and relationships and have greater financial accessibility than we have.
While we compete with other exploration companies in acquiring suitable properties, we believe that there would be readily available purchasers of lithium, boron and other minerals if they were to be produced from any of our leased properties. The price of minerals can be affected by a number of factors beyond our control, including:
• | fluctuations in the market prices for lithium or boron; |
• | fluctuating supplies of lithium or boron; |
• | changes in the demand for, or market prices of, lithium or boron; and |
• | mining activities of others. |
Government Regulations
Overview
Our exploration operations at the Project are subject to extensive laws and regulations, which are overseen and enforced by multiple U.S. federal, state and local authorities. These laws govern exploration, development, production, exports, various taxes, labor standards, occupational health and safety, waste disposal, protection and remediation of the environment, protection of endangered and protected species and other matters. Mineral exploration operations are also subject to U.S. federal and state laws and regulations that seek to maintain health and safety standards by regulating the design and use of drilling methods and equipment. Various permits from government bodies are required for drilling operations to be conducted, and we cannot assure you such permits will be received. Environmental laws and regulations also may:
• | require notice to stakeholders of proposed and ongoing operations; |
• | require the installation of pollution control equipment; |
• | restrict the types, quantities and concentration of various substances that can be released into the environment in connection with mining or drilling activities; |
• | limit or prohibit mining or drilling activities on lands located within wetlands, areas inhabited by endangered species and other protected areas, or otherwise restrict or prohibit activities that could impact the environment, including scarce water resources; |
• | impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from current or former operations on or for any preexisting environmental impacts at the Project site; and |
• | require preparation of an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement. |
As of the date hereof, other than with respect to the acquisition of the Project and related permitting activities, we have not been required to spend material amounts on compliance with environmental regulations. However, compliance with these laws and regulations may impose substantial costs on us, subject us to significant potential liabilities, and have an adverse effect upon our capital expenditures, results of operations or competitive position. Violations and liabilities with respect to these laws and regulations could result in significant administrative, civil, or criminal penalties, remedial clean-ups, natural resource damages, permit modifications or revocations, operational interruptions or shutdowns and other liabilities. The costs of remedying such conditions may be significant, and remediation obligations could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, Congress and federal and state agencies frequently revise environmental laws and regulations, and any changes in these regulations could require us to expend significant resources to comply with new laws or regulations or changes to current requirements and could have a material adverse effect on our business operations.
U.S. Legal Framework
The Project will be required to comply with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations and licensing and permitting requirements. The material environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that we may need to comply with include, among others, the following United States federal laws and regulations:
• | NEPA, which requires evaluation of the environmental impacts of mining operations that require federal approvals; |
• | Clean Air Act, or CAA, and its amendments, which governs air emissions; |
• | Clean Water Act, or CWA, which governs discharges to and excavations within the waters of the United States; |
• | Safe Drinking Water Act, or SDWA, which governs the underground injection and disposal of wastewater; |
• | FLPMA, which governs BLM’s management of the federal public lands; |
• | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, which governs the management of solid waste; |
• | Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, or CERCLA, which imposes liability where hazardous substances have been released into the environment (commonly known as Superfund); and |
• | Federal Mine Safety and Health Act, which established the primary safety and health standards regarding working conditions of employees engaged in mining, related operations, and preparation and milling of the minerals extracted, as well as the Occupational Safety and Health Act, which regulates the protection of the health and safety of workers to the extent such protection is not already addressed by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act. |
In addition, the ESA restricts activities that may affect endangered and threatened species or their habitats. Some of our operations may be located in areas that are designated as habitats for endangered or threatened species. In February 2016, FWS published a final policy which alters how it identifies critical habitat for endangered and threatened species. A critical habitat designation could result in further material restrictions to federal and private land use and could delay or prohibit land access or development. Moreover, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service continues its effort to make listing decisions and critical habitat designations where necessary for over 250 species, as required under a 2011 settlement approved by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and many hundreds of additional anticipated listing decisions have already been identified beyond those recognized in the 2011 settlement. The designation of previously unprotected species as being endangered or threatened could cause us to incur additional costs or become subject to operating restrictions in areas where the species are known to exist. On October 7, 2021, FWS proposed a rule to list Tiehm's buckwheat as an endangered species under the ESA. At that time, FWS indicated that it intended to make a final decision whether to list Tiehm's buckwheat under the ESA within one year. Additionally, FWS announced on February 2, 2022 that it had proposed critical habitat to accompany its proposal to list Tiehm's buckwheat as an endangered species under the ESA. We expect that FWS will issue its final decision regarding Tiehm's buckwheat listing and critical habitat in the near term.
Our operations are also subject to certain analogous and other state environmental law and regulations, including laws and regulations related to the reclamation of mined lands, which require the Company to provide financial assurances to secure reclamation permits before the commencement of mining operations.
Compliance with these and other federal and state laws and regulations could result in delays in obtaining, or failure to obtain, government permits and approvals, delays in beginning or expanding operations, limitations on production levels, incurring additional costs for investigation or cleanup of hazardous substances, payment of fines, penalties or remediation costs for non-compliance, and post-mining closure, reclamation and bonding. We cannot presently predict which federal laws and regulations may be amended by Congress and the new Biden Administration, respectively.
C. | Organizational Structure |
ioneer Limited is principally a holding company with a number of subsidiaries. Through these subsidiaries ioneer Limited owns 100% of the Project.
ioneer Limited owns all of the voting common stock issued by ioneer Holdings Nevada Inc. (a Nevada corporation) which in turn wholly owns ioneer USA Corporation (a Nevada corporation) and ioneer Minerals Corporation (a Nevada corporation). ioneer Limited wholly owns ioneer Canada ULC (a Canadian unlimited liability company) which in turn wholly owns ioneer Holdings USA Inc. (a Nevada corporation). ioneer Holdings USA Inc. owns all of the nonvoting preferred stock issued by ioneer Holdings Nevada Inc. (a Nevada corporation).
ioneer USA Corporation and Ioneer Minerals Corporation wholly own ioneer Rhyolite Ridge Holdings LLC (a Nevada limited liability company), which wholly owns ioneer Rhyolite Ridge MidCo LLC (a Nevada limited liability company), which wholly owns Ioneer Rhyolite Ridge LLC (a Nevada limited liability company), which wholly owns Ioneer Rhyolite SLP LLC. Ioneer Rhyolite Ridge LLC and Ioneer Rhyolite SLP LLC own the Project assets.
As of September 30, 2022, we hold our 100% interest in the Project through the foregoing described entities. Upon the completion of the transactions encompassing the Joint Venture, which we expect to close in the first half of calendar year 2023 subject to various conditions precedent, our interests in the Project will be held through ioneer Rhyolite Ridge Holdings LLC, which will be 50% owned by us and 50% owned by an entity or entities affiliated with Sibanye-Stillwater.
In addition to its ownership interest in ioneer Rhyolite Ridge Holdings LLC, ioneer USA Corporation wholly owns Gerlach Gold LLC (a Nevada limited liability company), which owns certain mining claims which are not part of the Project, and Paradigm AZ LLC (an Arizona limited liability company), an inactive entity which has no assets.
D. Property, Plant and Equipment
Description of the Property
Our principal asset is the Rhyolite Ridge Lithium-Boron project in Nevada, USA.
Location and Coordinates
The property is located in the west-central portion of Nevada’s Esmeralda County on public land administered by the BLM within the Silver Peak Range. Rhyolite Ridge is approximately 13 miles northeast from Dyer, Nevada (nearest town); 65 miles southwest of Tonopah, Nevada (closest city); 215 miles from Reno (third largest city in Nevada); and 255 miles from Las Vegas (largest city in Nevada) (all driving distances). Surface elevations at the Project site range from 5,535 to 6,010 feet (1,687 to 1,832 meters) above sea level. The South Basin, where our development of the Project is currently situated, measures 4 miles by 1 mile and covers an area of just under 2,000 acres. Rhyolite Ridge South Basin extends from approximately UTM 14,232,000 N to 14,246,000 N, and from 2,830,000 E to 2,842,000 E (NVSPW 1983, feet). Total surface area for the Rhyolite Ridge South Basin Project is approximately 7,861 acres. The Project site is located 15 miles west of Albermarle’s Silver Peak Lithium Mine (Figure 3.1), currently the only producing Lithium mine in the US. The coordinate system is presented in imperial units using the using the Nevada State Plane Coordinate System of 1983, West Zone (NVSPW 1983) projection, and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88).
No private surface rights are required for the project as the project is located on BLM ground including the access road which ioneer will have a right of way. Groundwater surface rights will be transferred from existing Fish Lake Valley (FLV) basin water rights holders to ioneer, as FLV is a closed basin such that it is closed to new groundwater rights. ioneer currently has sufficient lease options in place with landowners to cover all construction and operational water needs. Groundwater change applications will then need to be submitted to NDWR to officially transfer point of diversion and place of use for all Project groundwater rights. The groundwater change process will include NDWR review as well as a public comment period. Surface water rights will be required for the three Project ponds; and will be acquired through new surface water right applications from NDWR. These applications are in preparation and will be submitted at a later date. ioneer has agreements in place securing the necessary water rights for the Project. There are no known encumbrances to the Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves on the Property. See sections 3 and 15 of the TRS for additional information about the Project’s location and coordinates.
Infrastructure
The Project area is readily serviced by sealed highways (Hwy 95 or Hwy 6 and Hwy 264) and an unimproved gravel county road. The Project site may be reached from the towns of Tonopah or Dyer. Regular airline access to the Project area is available via international airports in Las Vegas 240 miles by road) or Reno (225 miles by road). ioneer is working with Esmeralda County officials in developing a traffic management plan that will integrate new access roads to the facility with the existing county roads in the area. Consideration will be given to make certain that the safety of all users of county roads is not compromised through development of the Project. The Project is near a region of active Lithium brine extraction and open-pit gold mining. The nearest operations are the Mineral Ridge Gold Mine, which has been in operation since 2011, and the Silver Peak Lithium Mine, which has been in operation since the 1960s. There are paved roads, powerlines and small towns that have a history of servicing the mining industry in the area. Nevada is considered one of the world’s most favorable and stable mining jurisdictions, and there is a high degree of experienced, qualified, and skilled personnel available to meet workforce requirements for the Project. Housing options near the site are limited and there are not currently any plans to construct a workforce camp. Ioneer plans to contribute to individual housing support, which is included in the operating costs estimate, and may also invest in local housing infrastructure. The Rhyolite Ridge Project is designed to operate separate from the Nevada power grid. Power will be produced onsite using a steam turbine generator. Steam will be produced from the waste heat boiler in the Sulphuric Acid Plant, to supply the steam turbine generator. Fresh water will be supplied by wells that are approximately 1.5-miles from site near the quarry perimeter. The line will supply the site’s domestic and firewater needs, as well as the process make-up water. Water derived from sources of groundwater will be integrated into the water supply and distribution system using pipelines to provide water to meet site needs (i.e., make-up process water, dust control, fire suppression, potable needs). There is sufficient water available to meet processing and dust control requirements, with water recycling and reuse systems in place where possible. See sections 4 and 15 of the TRS for additional information about the Project’s infrastructure.
Mining Claims
The mineral tenement and land tenure for the Project comprises a total of 386 unpatented lode mining claims (totaling approximately 7,861 acres). in three claim groups, held by two wholly owned subsidiaries of ioneer. Most of the claims, 366 (7,448 acres), are held by ioneer Minerals Corporation, with the remaining 20 claims (413 acres) held by ioneer USA Corporation. The three claim groups include, South Lithium Basin (SLB), Solid Leasable Mineral (SLM), and Rhyolite Ridge (RR). The 386 claims are shown in Figure 3.2. Each claim is subject to a yearly maintenance fee of $165.00, totaling $63,690 for the 386 claims.
Please see Figures 3.1 and 3.2 in the TRS, which is filed as an exhibit to this annual report on Form 20-F, for maps showing the boundaries of the Project and the lode mining claims.
Development Plans
We continue to work towards securing all necessary permits and approvals required for the construction and operation of the Project. In addition, other key remaining workstreams include debt funding for the Project, securing additional lithium offtake agreements and completing detail engineering and vendor engineer to ensure we are construction ready. We may also elect to undertake additional exploration and evaluation drilling, and optimization works. See “A. History and Development of the Company” for more information about our development plans.
ITEM 4A. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. | OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F, particularly those in the section of this annual report on Form 20-F entitled “Risk Factors.” The consolidated general purpose financial statements of the consolidated group have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB.
Material accounting policies adopted in the preparation of this financial report are presented below and have been consistently applied unless otherwise stated.
Our annual consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2022, 2021 and 2020 are presented in Australian dollars and have been prepared in accordance with IFRS.
Business Strategy
Subject to market conditions and the ability to define an economically viable project, our business plan for the Project is to become a low-cost and globally significant producer of both lithium and boron products. We plan to effect our business plan as described in “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—Development Plans.”
Summary
The following table sets forth our selected financial information for the periods indicated:
Consolidated Statement of Profit and Loss and Other Comprehensive Income (in thousands) | | Fiscal 2022 | | | Fiscal 2021 | | | Fiscal 2020 | |
| |
| A$’000 | | | | A$’000 | | | | A$’000 | |
Exploration expenditure written off | | | (24 | ) | | | (48 | ) | | | (81 | ) |
Other income | | | — | | | | — | | | | 138 | |
Employee benefits expensed | | | (6,658 | ) | | | (5,899 | ) | | | (5,063 | ) |
Other expenses | | | (9,877 | ) | | | (3,008 | ) | | | (3,250 | ) |
Loss from operating activities | | | (16,559 | ) | | | (8,955 | ) | | | (8,256 | ) |
Finance income | | | 4,000 | | | | 97 | | | | 2,838 | |
Finance costs | | | (24 | ) | | | (1,468 | ) | | | (28 | ) |
Net finance income / (costs) | | | 3,976 | | | | (1,371 | ) | | | 2,810 | |
Loss before tax | | | (12,583 | ) | | | (10,326 | ) | | | (5,446 | ) |
Income tax expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Loss for the year | | | (12,583 | ) | | | (10,326 | ) | | | (5,446 | ) |
Loss attributable to equity holders of the company | | | (12,583 | ) | | | (10,326 | ) | | | (5,446 | ) |
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (in thousands) | | Fiscal 2022 | | | Fiscal 2021 | |
| |
| A$’000 | | | | A$’000 | |
Current assets | | | | | | | | |
Cash assets | | | 136,568 | | | | 83,078 | |
Receivables | | | 213 | | | | 359 | |
Total current assets | | | 136,781 | | | | 83,437 | |
Non-current assets | | | | | | | | |
Receivables | | | 282 | | | | 266 | |
Plant and equipment | | | — | | | | 3 | |
Right of use asset | | | 356 | | | | 309 | |
Exploration and evaluation expenditure | | | 171,819 | | | | 114,375 | |
Total non-current assets | | | 172,457 | | | | 114,953 | |
Total assets | | | 309,238 | | | | 198,390 | |
Current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Payables | | | 12,752 | | | | 6,630 | |
Lease liabilities | | | 243 | | | | 251 | |
Provisions | | | 721 | | | | 375 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 13,716 | | | | 7,256 | |
Non-current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Lease liabilities – non-current | | | 126 | | | | 79 | |
Total non-current liabilities | | | 126 | | | | 79 | |
Total liabilities | | | 13,842 | | | | 7,335 | |
Net assets | | | 295,396 | | | | 191,055 | |
Equity | | | | | | | | |
Contributed equity | | | 337,494 | | | | 230,730 | |
Reserves | | | 13,892 | | | | 3,732 | |
Accumulated losses | | | (55,990 | ) | | | (43,407 | ) |
Total equity | | | 295,396 | | | | 191,055 | |
Revenues
We are a development stage company and have had no revenue from sales. Other income for fiscal 2022 was A$0, which is in line with fiscal 2021 but A$138,000 lower than fiscal 2020, which included the re-recognition of reclamation bonds previously written off. Finance income for fiscal 2022 was A$4,000,000, which is A$3,903,00 higher than fiscal 2021 primarily due to net foreign exchange gains of $3,847,000. Finance income for fiscal 2021 was A$96,649, which is A$2,837,502 lower than fiscal 2020 principally as a result of a realized net foreign exchange gain in fiscal 2020.
Expenses
Expenses incurred (in thousands) | | Fiscal 2022 | | | Fiscal 2021 | | | Fiscal 2020 | |
Exploration expenditure written off | | | (24 | ) | | | (48 | ) | | | (81 | ) |
Employee benefits expensed | | | (6,658 | ) | | | (5,899 | ) | | | (5,063 | ) |
Other expenses | | | (9,877 | ) | | | (3,008 | ) | | | (3,250 | ) |
Finance costs | | | (24 | ) | | | (1,468 | ) | | | (28 | ) |
Exploration expenditure written off. Exploration expenditure written off includes permitting costs for non-core assets. Exploration expenditure written off decreased A$24,000, or 50% from fiscal 2021 to 2022 and decreased A$33,000, or 41%, from fiscal 2020 to fiscal 2021. These decreases have occurred as ioneer has reduced the number of non-core permits it holds year on year.
Employee benefits expensed. Employee benefits expensed includes Non-executive Director fees, Executive director fees, employee benefits and share based payments expenses. Employee benefits expensed increased A$759,000 or 13% from fiscal 2021 to fiscal 2022 and increased A$836,000, or 17%, from fiscal 2020 to fiscal 2021. These increases have been driven by an increase in the number of directors and employees year on year, increases to underlying salaries and the award of share-based payments.
Other expenses. Other expenses includes general and administrative expenses, consulting and professional costs and depreciation and amortization. Other expenses increased A$6,869,000, or 228%, from fiscal 2021 to fiscal 2022 largely as a result of consulting and professional fees for the Sibanye-Stillwater joint venture agreement, the Nasdaq listing and the Department of Energy Loans Program Office due diligence process. Other expenses decreased A$242,000, or 7%, from fiscal 2020 to fiscal 2021 as a result of lower consulting and professional costs being partly offset by higher general and administration fees.
Finance costs. Finance costs includes bank charges, net foreign exchange losses and lease interest expenses. Finance costs decreased by A$1,444,000, or 98%, from fiscal 2021 to fiscal 2022, driven largely by a net foreign exchange loss in fiscal 2021 of A$1,436,000. Finance costs increased A$1,440,000, or 5143%, from fiscal 2020 to fiscal 2021. as a result of the same net foreign exchange loss of A$1,436,000.
Comparison of the fiscal years 2022 and 2021
Our net loss for fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2021 was A$12,583,000 and A$10,326,000, respectively. Significant items contributing to the current year loss and the differences from the previous financial year include:
• | Employee benefits expense increased A$759,000; |
• | Other expenses increased A$6,869,000; |
• | Finance income increased A$3,903,000; and |
• | Finance costs decreased A$1,444,000. |
Comparison of the fiscal years 2021 and 2020
Our net loss for fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2020 was A$10,326,000 and A$5,446,000, respectively. Significant items contributing to the fiscal 2021 loss and the differences from fiscal 2020 include:
• | Employee benefits expense increased A$836,000; |
• | Finance income decreased A$2,741,000; and |
• | Finance costs increased A$1,440,000. |
Historical Sources and Uses of Cash
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (in thousands) | | Fiscal 2022 | | | Fiscal 2021 | | | Fiscal 2020 | |
| |
| A$’000 | | |
| A$’000 | | | | A$’000 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payment to suppliers and employees | | | (15,089 | ) | | | (6,487 | ) | | | (6,745 | ) |
Interest and other finance costs paid | | | (7 | ) | | | — | | | | (28 | ) |
Net cash flows used in operating activities | | | (15,096 | ) | | | (6,487 | ) | | | (6,773 | ) |
Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenditure on mining exploration | | | (36,384 | ) | | | (23,677 | ) | | | (45,080 | ) |
Purchase of equipment | | | (4 | ) | | | (6 | ) | | | (21 | ) |
Interest received | | | 69 | | | | 39 | | | | 747 | |
Net cash flows used in investing activities | | | (36,319 | ) | | | (23,644 | ) | | | (44,354 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from the issue of shares | | | 95,584 | | | | 80,000 | | | | 40,000 | |
Proceeds from exercise of options | | | 7,900 | | | | — | | | | 578 | |
Equity raising expenses | | | (2,697 | ) | | | (3,515 | ) | | | (1,799 | ) |
Payments of lease liability | | | (228 | ) | | | (107 | ) | | | (103 | ) |
Net cash flows received from financing activities | | | 100,559 | | | | 76,378 | | | | 38,676 | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash held | | | 49,144 | | | | 46,247 | | | | (12,451 | ) |
Cash at the beginning of the financial year | | | 83,078 | | | | 38,268 | | | | 48,604 | |
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on balances of cash held in USD | | | 4,346 | | | | (1,437 | ) | | | 2,115 | |
Closing cash carried forward | | | 136,568 | | | | 83,078 | | | | 38,268 | |
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities of A$15,096,000 in fiscal 2022 increased by A$8,609,000 compared to fiscal 2021 and was driven primarily by increased payments to suppliers and employees. Net cash used in operating activities of A$6,487,000 in fiscal 2021 decreased A$286,000 compared to fiscal 2020 and was driven primarily by reduced expenditures due to Covid-19.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities of A$36,319,000 in fiscal 2022 increased by A$12,675,000 compared to fiscal 2021 and was driven primarily by increased Project engineering work. Net cash used in investing activities of A$23,644,000 in fiscal 2021 decreased A$20,710,000 compared to fiscal 2020 and was driven primarily by a significant reduction in Project engineering work.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities of A$100,559,000 in fiscal 2022 increased by A$24,181,000 compared to fiscal 2021 and was driven primarily by the Sibanye-Stillwater placement of A$95,584,000 and the exercise of unlisted options of A$12,517,000, offset by share issue costs. Net cash provided by financing activities of A$76,378,000 in fiscal 2021 increased A$37,702,000 compared to fiscal 2020 and was driven by an A$80 million placement of ordinary shares in ioneer Limited.
B. | Liquidity and Capital Resources |
In fiscal 2022, 2021 and 2020, we incurred a loss of A$12.583 million, A$10.326 million and A$5.446 million, respectively, and had accumulated losses of A$55.990 million as of June 30, 2022. We have not yet commenced commercial production at any of our properties and expect to continue to incur losses during the exploration, evaluation, and development of the Project.
Our operations have been financed primarily by proceeds from issuances of ordinary shares. Our cash and cash equivalent position at June 30, 2022 was A$136.568 million, compared to A$83.078 million as at June 30, 2021 and A$38.268 million as at June 30, 2020.
In fiscal 2022, we announced a placement of 145.9 million shares at an issue price of A$0.6553 per share to Sibanye-Stillwater. Proceeds from the placement will be used to fund working capital, the costs necessary to advance the Project to commencement of construction and long-lead items and other capital costs. The placement was approved by shareholders at an Extraordinary General Meeting held on October 21, 2021 and we subsequently issued 145.9 million ordinary shares to Sibanye-Stillwater.
Capital Expenditures and Requirements
Our capital expenditures for fiscal 2022, 2021 and 2020 amounted to A$46.5 million, A$27.8 million and A$44.4 million, respectively. Our capital expenditures for fiscal 2022, 2021, and 2020 related primarily to the Definitive Feasibility Study, the Pilot Plant, permitting expenditures, land option and water rights payments, ongoing detail engineering and vendor engineering. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Capital Expenditures—Pilot Plant” for additional discussion of our Pilot Plant.
We estimated in April 2020 that development of the Project would require approximately US$785 million. If we ultimately make an FID to develop the Project, we will need to secure substantial additional funds to complete development. We expect to obtain a US$490 million equity contribution from Sibanye-Stillwater as part of the Strategic Partnership, subject to the satisfaction of conditions precedent. One condition is that debt financing for the Project will be secured. Even if the conditions precedent are met and Sibanye-Stillwater makes a US$490 million equity contribution, we may need to secure substantial additional funds, through future debt or equity financings, to complete development of the Project.
We also may decide to pursue additional debt or equity financing activities to facilitate further exploration, evaluation and development activities.
If we decide to raise capital by issuing equity securities, the issuance of additional ordinary shares or ADSs would result in dilution to our existing shareholders. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in completing any financings or that any such debt or equity financing will be available to us if and when required or on satisfactory terms.
C. | Research and Development, Patents and Licenses |
Not Applicable.
Not applicable, as the Company is in development stage and therefore has no material trends in production, sales or inventory.
E. | Critical Accounting Estimates |
The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with IFRS has required management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions which impact the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. These estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical knowledge and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable in the circumstance. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed regularly and revisions to accounting estimates are reviewed in the period in which the estimate is revised. The most significant estimates and assumptions which have a significant risk of causing material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year relate to:
Reserve Estimates
Reserves are estimates of the amount of product that can be economically and legally extracted, processed and sold from our properties under current and foreseeable economic conditions. We determine and report reserves under the standards incorporated in the Australian Code for Reporting Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, 2012 edition (the JORC code).
The determination of ore reserves includes estimates and assumptions about a range of geological, technical and economic factors including quantities, grades, production techniques, recovery rates, commodity prices and exchange rates. Changes in ore reserve impact the assessment of recoverability of exploration and evaluation assets.
Estimating the quantity and/or grade of reserves requires the size, shape and depth of ore to be determined by analyzing geological data. This process may require complex and difficult judgements to interpret the data. We use expert consultants to prepare and review our ore reserve estimates.
The information in this annual report that relates to mineral resources and ore reserves is based on estimates included in the TRS, which is filed as an exhibit to this annual report on Form 20-F.
Exploration and Evaluation Assets
Our policy for exploration and evaluation expenditure is set out in note 4.5 of our Financial Statements as of June 30, 2022. The application of this policy requires certain judgements, estimates and assumptions as to the future events and circumstances, in particular the assessment of whether economic quantities of reserves will be found. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after capitalization of expenditure under the policy, it is concluded that the capitalized expenditure will not be recovered by future exploitation or sale, then the relevant amount will be written off in the statement of profit or loss. Changes in assumptions may result in a material adjustment to the carrying amount of exploration and evaluation assets.
Share-based Payment Transactions
We measure the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity investments at the date on which they are granted. Additional information is set out in note 7.3, Share-based payments.
ITEM 6. | DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES |
A. | Directors and Senior Management |
The following discussion sets forth information regarding our directors and executive officers as of September 30, 2022. In accordance with the ASX Listing Rules, a Director (other than the Managing Director) must not hold office, without re-election, past the third annual general meeting following the Director's appointment or three years, whichever is longer. In addition, under our Constitution, at every annual general meeting, one-third of the Directors (other than the Managing Director), are required to retire from office. Such Directors are entitled to submit for re-election. The following table lists the names of our directors and executive officers. The business address for each director and member of senior management is c/o Suite 5.03, Level 5, 140 Arthur Street, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia.
Name | | Age | | Position |
James D. Calaway | | 64 | | Executive Chairman |
Bernard Rowe | | 55 | | Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer |
Alan Davies | | 51 | | Independent Non-executive Director |
Stephen Gardiner | | 64 | | Independent Non-executive Director |
Rose McKinney-James | | 70 | | Independent Non-executive Director |
Margaret Walker | | 70 | | Independent Non-executive Director |
Ian Bucknell | | 52 | | Chief Financial Officer & Company Secretary |
Ken Coon | | 61 | | Vice President of Human Resources |
Yoshio Nagai | | 61 | | Vice President Commercial Sales & Marketing |
Matt Weaver | | 56 | | Senior Vice President of Engineering and Operations |
James D. Calaway (64 years of age) – Executive Chairman
James Calaway has considerable experience and success in building young companies into successful commercial enterprises. He was the non-executive chairman Orocobre Ltd from May 2009 to July 2016, helping lead the company from its earliest development to becoming a significant producer of lithium carbonate and a member of the ASX 300. He joined the board of ioneer as a non-executive director in April 2017, has served as Chairman since June 2017 and was appointed Executive Chairman in July 2020.
James is currently Chairman of Distributed Power Partners Inc, a US international distributed power development company which is a leader in clustered distributed solar power development. He has also been a chair of several other U.S. corporate boards including the Centre for Houston’s Future, and the Houston Independent School District Foundation.
Bernard Rowe (55 years of age) – Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
Bernard was appointed managing director and Chief Executive Officer in August 2007. He has more than 30 years’ international experience in mineral exploration and mine development. His diverse mineral industry experience includes gold, copper, zinc, diamond, lithium and boron exploration in Australia, Europe, Africa, North America and South America. He led the Company’s listing on the ASX in 2007 with a focus on gold and copper exploration in Nevada and Peru. In early 2016 Bernard visited a little-known lithium-boron deposit in southern Nevada – later to be renamed Rhyolite Ridge. He realised the potential opportunity and quickly secured a 12-month option over the Project to give the Company sufficient time to fully assess and evaluate the unique and poorly understood deposit. Bernard is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists, the Society of Economic Geologist and the Geological Society of Nevada.
Alan Davies (51 years of age) – Independent Non-executive Director
Alan joined the board as a non-executive director in May 2017. He has expertise in running and leading mining businesses with Rio Tinto, most recently as chief executive, Energy & Minerals. Former roles include chief executive, Diamonds & Minerals and chief financial officer of Rio Tinto Iron Ore. Alan held management positions in Australia, London and the US for Rio Tinto’s Iron Ore and Energy businesses, and has run and managed operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe and North and South America. He is also a former director of Rolls Royce Holdings plc. He is currently the chief executive officer of the Moxico Resources PLC a Zambian copper and zinc explorer and developer. He is also Chairman of Trigem DMCC, a vertically integrated diamond and coloured stone service provider. Alan is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.
Stephen Gardiner (64 years of age) – Independent Non-executive Director
Stephen joined the board as a non-executive director in August 2022. He has over 40 years of corporate finance experience at major international companies listed on the ASX, culminating in 17 years at Oil Search Limited including eight years as Chief Financial Officer. Stephen has covered a range of executive responsibilities including corporate finance and control, treasury, tax, audit and assurance, risk management, investor relations and communications, ICT and sustainability. He also served as Group Secretary for ten years while performing his finance roles. Prior to Oil Search, he held senior corporate finance roles at major multinational companies including CSR Limited and Pioneer International Limited, including being based in the US for a period. He currently serves as a non-executive director of Central Petroleum Limited (appointed July 2021). He holds a Bachelor of Economics from Sydney University and is a fellow of CPA Australia.
Rose McKinney-James (70 years of age) – Independent Non-executive Director
Rose is an experienced and accomplished public company director, clean energy advocate, and small business leader with a broad history in public service, private sector corporate sustainability, social impact, and non-profit volunteerism. She is the former President and CEO of the Corporation for Solar Technology and Renewable Resources (“CSTRR”), and former Commissioner with the Nevada Public Service Commission, she also served as Nevada’s first Director of the Department of Business and Industry. She is currently the Managing Principal of Energy Works LLC and McKinney-James & Associates, which provides business-consulting services and advocacy in public affairs, energy policy, strategy and economic and sustainable development. She is also a Non-Executive Director of MGM Resorts International, CLEAResult, and NACD Pacific Southwest and Board chair for the Energy Foundation. Rose holds a Juris Doctorate from Antioch School of Law and a BA in Liberal Arts from Olivet College. She has been honoured by the American Solar Energy Society (“SOLAR NV”) as the Advocate of the Year. She is the recipient of the inaugural GreenBiz Verge VANGUARD Award and the DirectWomen Sandra Day O’Connor Award for Board Excellence.
Margaret R. Walker (70 years of age) – Independent Non-executive Director
Margaret brings over 40 years’ experience and leadership in large-scale chemical engineering, project management and organisational development gained through a career as a chemical engineer with The Dow Chemical Company (“Dow Chemical”). From 2004 until her retirement in December 2010, Mrs. Walker was Vice President of Engineering & Technology for Dow Chemical. Prior to this, Margaret held other senior positions with Dow Chemical including Senior Leader in Manufacturing & Engineering and Business Director of Contract Manufacturing. Dow Chemical provides chemical, plastic and agricultural products and services. She is currently a Non-Executive Director of Methanex Corp., the world’s largest producer and supplier of methanol, where she is a member of the Responsible Care Committee and Human Resources Committee. Margaret holds a Bachelor of Chemical Engineering from Texas Tech University, and in 2018 became a National Association of Corporate Directors Board Leadership Fellow.
Ian Bucknell (52 years of age) – Chief Financial Officer & Company Secretary
Ian joined ioneer in November 2018 as Chief Financial Officer and became Company Secretary in April 2019. Ian is responsible for the finance, investor relations, IT and company secretarial functions of the Company. He has more than 20 years of international resource sector experience, most recently as Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary of AWE Limited and previously held the position of Chief Financial Officer of Drillsearch Energy Limited.
Ken Coon (61 years of age) – Vice President of Human Resources
Ken Coon is responsible for the human resource function of the Company. He has more than 30 years of human resources experience holding international and regional leadership roles with Royal Dutch Shell’s downstream refining and chemicals organization and Entergy, a large US Gulf Coast utility company.
Yoshio Nagai (61 years of age) – Vice President Commercial Sales & Marketing
Yoshio Nagai is responsible for the sales and marketing function of the Company. He has more than 20 years chemical and mining industry sales and marketing experience, most recently as Sales Vice President at the Rio Tinto Group Company accountable for borates, salt and talc products, in Asia and the USA.
Matt Weaver (56 years of age) – Senior Vice President of Engineering and Operations
Matt Weaver is responsible for all engineering and operational aspects of the Rhyolite Ridge lithium-boron Project in Nevada and for delivering the Project through the Definitive Feasibility Study and project execution and into full commercial production. He has 30 years international mining, having worked with BHP, Rio Tinto and Newmont, and several junior mining companies.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships between any members of our executive management and our directors.
Arrangements for Election of Directors and Members of Management
There are no contracts or other arrangements pursuant to which directors have been or must be selected.
Overview
Our remuneration policy for our key management personnel (“KMP”) has been developed by our Board taking into account our size, the size of our management team, the nature and stage of development of our current operations, and market conditions and comparable salary levels for companies of a similar size and operating in similar sectors.
In addition to considering the above general factors, the Board has also placed emphasis on the following specific issues in determining the remuneration policy for KMP:
• | we are currently focused on undertaking exploration, appraisal and development activities; |
• | risks associated with developing resource companies whilst exploring and developing projects; and |
• | other than profit which may be generated from asset sales, we do not expect to be undertaking profitable operations until sometime after the commencement of commercial production on any of our projects. |
Executive Remuneration
Our remuneration framework and executive reward strategy provides a mix of fixed and variable remuneration with a blend of short and long-term incentives. The key elements of the remuneration packages are as follows:
• | Fixed: Annual base salary. |
• | Variable short-term incentive: annual cash bonus. |
• | Variable equity: performance rights granted under shareholder approved equity incentive plans |
• | Post-employment benefits: superannuation contributions and similar retirement benefits savings for non-Australian executives. |
We believe our executive compensation strategy provides for fair, competitive remuneration that aligns potential rewards with the Company’s objectives while being transparent to shareholders. Key remuneration elements are reviewed annually to determine appropriate awards based upon factors such as individual performance, Company results and competitive benchmark survey data.
Fixed
Base salaries are reviewed annually and adjusted based upon individual performance and competitive benchmarks that may be reviewed from time to time to ensure competitiveness.
Variable short-term incentive
Annual (short-term) cash bonuses are reviewed annually with awards granted based upon individual performance and Company results. Bonus targets are benchmarked from time to time to ensure competitiveness. Bonuses may range from 0 to 200% of target. The Board reserves the right to grant bonuses larger than 200% for exceptional contributions to Company objectives.
Variable equity
Equity (long-term) grants are reviewed annually with a portion of the grants being performance based and a portion restricted time based. The Board has a current practice of granting a ratio of 60% performance-based equity rights and 40% restricted time-based equity rights. Typically, equity grants awarded as part of the Company’s annual review cycle will vest over a 3-year period. Vesting of performance-based grants are reviewed with the time-based grants at the time of vesting with the size of the vested award to be based upon the degree to which pre-established objectives were achieved, and the overall value of the vested award determined by market share price. Performance based equity grants may range between 0 and 200% at time of vesting based upon achievement of pre-established business targets. Equity targets are benchmarked from time to time to ensure competitiveness.
Post-employment benefits
Superannuation funds are accessible by Australian employees after retirement, as mandated by Australian law. Similar retirement benefits savings for non-Australian executives are accessible after retirement.
Non-Executive Director Remuneration
Total remuneration for all non-executive directors, last voted upon by shareholders at the 2017 Annual General Meeting of the Company, is not to exceed A$1,000,000 per annum, inclusive of superannuation (excluding special exertion fees).
This total pool enables the Company in the future, if required, to provide for:
• | Adequate financial incentives, commensurate with the market to attract and retain suitably qualified and experienced directors to replace existing non-executive directors; |
• | Appropriate arrangements to be put in place to ensure a smooth transition on replacement of directors, including a period of overlap if required; and |
• | Increases in non-executive directors in the future should it be considered appropriate. |