Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-511
COBRA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
DELAWARE | | 36-2479991 |
(State of Incorporation) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
6500 WEST CORTLAND STREET | | |
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS | | 60707 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (773) 889-8870
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer o |
| | |
Non-accelerated filer o | | Smaller reporting company x |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO x
Number of shares of Common Stock of Registrant outstanding as of May 7, 2010: 6,471,280
Table of Contents
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Cobra Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations - Unaudited
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Net sales | | $ | 21,083 | | $ | 19,085 | |
Cost of sales | | 15,233 | | 14,023 | |
Gross profit | | 5,850 | | 5,062 | |
Selling, general and administrative expense | | 6,886 | | 7,056 | |
Loss from operations | | (1,036 | ) | (1,994 | ) |
Interest expense | | (263 | ) | (150 | ) |
Other expense | | (25 | ) | (257 | ) |
Loss before income taxes | | (1,324 | ) | (2,401 | ) |
Tax benefit | | (7 | ) | (786 | ) |
Net loss | | (1,317 | ) | (1,615 | ) |
Less: net earnings attributable to non-controlling interest | | — | | 1 | |
Net loss attributable to Cobra | | $ | (1,317 | ) | $ | (1,616 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net loss per common share attributable to Cobra shareholders: | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) |
Diluted | | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) |
| | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | |
Basic | | 6,471 | | 6,471 | |
Diluted | | 6,471 | | 6,471 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Cobra Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets - Unaudited
(In Thousands)
| | March 31, | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
ASSETS | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 955 | | $ | 1,405 | |
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $106 in 2010 and $103 in 2009 | | 17,056 | | 22,095 | |
Inventories, primarily finished goods, net | | 26,000 | | 26,198 | |
Other current assets | | 4,205 | | 3,961 | |
Total current assets | | 48,216 | | 53,659 | |
Property, plant and equipment, at cost: | | | | | |
Buildings and improvements | | 5,904 | | 5,707 | |
Tooling and equipment | | 17,826 | | 17,746 | |
| | 23,730 | | 23,453 | |
Accumulated depreciation | | (18,821 | ) | (18,318 | ) |
Land | | 230 | | 230 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | 5,139 | | 5,365 | |
Other assets: | | | | | |
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies | | 4,254 | | 4,051 | |
Deferred income taxes, non-current | | 1,379 | | 1,717 | |
Intangible assets | | 10,041 | | 10,769 | |
Other assets | | 199 | | 142 | |
Total other assets | | 15,873 | | 16,679 | |
Total assets | | $ | 69,228 | | $ | 75,703 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Cobra Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets - Unaudited
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
| | March 31, | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | |
Current maturities of long-term bank debt | | $ | 12,840 | | $ | 16,549 | |
Accounts payable | | 7,850 | | 7,427 | |
Accrued salaries and commissions | | 944 | | 902 | |
Accrued advertising and sales promotion costs | | 996 | | 1,392 | |
Accrued product warranty costs | | 704 | | 857 | |
Accrued income taxes | | 146 | | 73 | |
Deferred income taxes, current | | 1,385 | | 1,728 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | 2,457 | | 2,524 | |
Total current liabilities | | 27,322 | | 31,452 | |
Non-current liabilities: | | | | | |
Long-term bank debt, net of current maturities | | 880 | | 1,320 | |
Deferred compensation | | 6,989 | | 6,772 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 1,771 | | 1,935 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | 951 | | 961 | |
Total non-current liabilities | | 10,591 | | 10,988 | |
Total liabilities | | 37,913 | | 42,440 | |
Commitments and contingencies | | — | | — | |
Shareholders’ equity: | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $1 par value 1,000,000 shares authorized None issued and outstanding | | — | | — | |
Common stock, $.33 1/3 par value 12,000,000 shares authorized 7,039,100 shares issued 6,471,280 shares outstanding | | 2,345 | | 2,345 | |
Paid-in capital | | 20,640 | | 20,583 | |
Retained earnings | | 14,716 | | 16,033 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (2,576 | ) | (1,889 | ) |
| | 35,125 | | 37,072 | |
Treasury stock, at cost (567,820 shares) | | (3,837 | ) | (3,837 | ) |
Total shareholders’ equity - Cobra | | 31,288 | | 33,235 | |
Non-controlling interest | | 27 | | 28 | |
Total equity | | 31,315 | | 33,263 | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 69,228 | | $ | 75,703 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Cobra Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows - Unaudited
(In Thousands)
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Net loss attributable to Cobra | | $ | (1,317 | ) | $ | (1,616 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 950 | | 978 | |
Deferred income taxes | | (67 | ) | (1,040 | ) |
(Gain) loss on cash surrender value (CSV) of life insurance | | (69 | ) | 279 | |
Stock-based compensation | | 56 | | 59 | |
Non-controlling interest | | — | | 1 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
Receivables | | 4,841 | | 3,791 | |
Inventories | | (275 | ) | (620 | ) |
Other assets | | (460 | ) | (617 | ) |
Accounts payable | | 597 | | 1,042 | |
Accrued income taxes | | 73 | | (10 | ) |
Accrued liabilities | | (447 | ) | (1,328 | ) |
Deferred compensation | | 217 | | 168 | |
Deferred income | | (35 | ) | (12 | ) |
Other long-term liabilities | | (15 | ) | 98 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | 4,049 | | 1,173 | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment | | (172 | ) | (231 | ) |
Premiums on CSV life insurance | | (135 | ) | — | |
Intangible assets | | (131 | ) | (140 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (438 | ) | (371 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
Bank borrowings | | (4,149 | ) | (874 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | (4,149 | ) | (874 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | 88 | | (573 | ) |
Net decrease in cash | | (450 | ) | (645 | ) |
Cash at beginning of period | | 1,405 | | 1,985 | |
Cash at end of period | | $ | 955 | | $ | 1,340 | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 268 | | $ | 139 | |
Income taxes, net of refunds | | $ | 1 | | $ | 87 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
Cobra Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Cobra Electronics Corporation (the “Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures contained herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet as of that date. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. In the opinion of management, the information contained herein reflects all adjustments necessary to make the results of operations for the interim period a fair statement of such operations. Due to the seasonality of the Company’s business, the results of operations of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a fiscal year.
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Business — Cobra designs and markets consumer electronics products, which it sells primarily under the Cobra brand name principally in the United States, Canada and Europe. Effective October 20, 2006, the Company acquired Performance Products Limited (“PPL”) which sells its products under the Snooper tradename, principally in the United Kingdom, as well as elsewhere in Europe. A majority of the Company’s products are purchased from overseas suppliers, primarily in China, Hong Kong and South Korea. The consumer electronics market is characterized by rapidly changing technology and certain products may have limited life cycles. Management believes that it maintains strong relationships with its current suppliers and that, if necessary, other suppliers could be found. The extent to which a change in a supplier would have an adverse effect on the Company’s business depends on the timing of the change, the product or products that the supplier produces for the Company and the volume of that production. The Company also maintains insurance coverage that would, in certain limited circumstances, reimburse the Company for lost profits resulting from a supplier’s inability to fulfill its commitments to the Company.
Principles of Consolidation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. The consolidated entities are collectively referred to as the “Company”. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
7
Table of Contents
(2) SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company operates in two business segments (1) Cobra Consumer Electronics (“Cobra”) and (2) Performance Products Limited (“PPL”). The Cobra segment is comprised of Cobra Electronics Corporation, Cobra Hong Kong Limited (“CHK”) and Cobra Electronics Europe Limited (“CEEL”). The Company has separate sales departments and distribution channels for each segment, which provide segment exclusive product lines to all customers for that segment. Currently, there are no intersegment sales.
The financial information by business segment for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | COBRA | | PPL | | TOTAL | | COBRA | | PPL | | TOTAL | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Net sales | | $ | 17,555 | | $ | 3,528 | | $ | 21,083 | | $ | 17,248 | | $ | 1,837 | | $ | 19,085 | |
Cost of sales | | 12,963 | | 2,270 | | 15,233 | | 12,987 | | 1,036 | | 14,023 | |
Gross profit | | 4,592 | | 1,258 | | 5,850 | | 4,261 | | 801 | | 5,062 | |
Selling, general and administrative expense | | 5,801 | | 1,085 | | 6,886 | | 6,077 | | 979 | | 7,056 | |
(Loss) earnings from operations | | (1,209 | ) | 173 | | (1,036 | ) | (1,816 | ) | (178 | ) | (1,994 | ) |
Interest expense | | (263 | ) | — | | (263 | ) | (150 | ) | — | | (150 | ) |
Other income (expense) | | 33 | | (58 | ) | (25 | ) | (234 | ) | (23 | ) | (257 | ) |
(Loss) earnings before income taxes | | (1,439 | ) | 115 | | (1,324 | ) | (2,200 | ) | (201 | ) | (2,401 | ) |
Tax provision (benefit) | | 35 | | (42 | ) | (7 | ) | (713 | ) | (73 | ) | (786 | ) |
Net (loss) earnings | | (1,474 | ) | 157 | | (1,317 | ) | (1,487 | ) | (128 | ) | (1,615 | ) |
Less: net earnings attributable to non-controlling interest | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 1 | | 1 | |
Net (loss) earnings attributable to Cobra | | $ | (1,474 | ) | $ | 157 | | $ | (1,317 | ) | $ | (1,487 | ) | $ | (129 | ) | $ | (1,616 | ) |
There have been no differences in the basis of segmentation or the basis of measurement.
(3) INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes are determined based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities given the enacted tax laws for each applicable tax jurisdiction. The deferred income tax provisions and benefits are based on changes to the assets or liabilities from year to year. Valuation allowances related to deferred taxes are recorded based on the more likely than not realization criteria. The Company reviews the need for a valuation allowance on a quarterly basis for each of its tax jurisdictions. When evaluating the recoverability of future tax benefits, the Company considers the historic operating results, projected operating results and available tax planning strategies, if any.
Due to the operating results for 2009, the expected continuation of a global recession and the absence of tax planning strategies to generate a sufficient level of taxable income, management concluded the full realization of the deferred tax assets within a reasonable time horizon did not satisfy the more likely than not realization criteria. Accordingly, the Company established a $9.6 million deferred tax valuation allowance for its U.S. operation in the second quarter of 2009. The valuation allowance is a non-cash charge that does not preclude the Company from fully realizing the net deferred tax assets in the future. The deferred tax valuation allowance totaled $8.4 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
The Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009, enacted November 6, 2009, allows eligible businesses a one-time election to carry back net operating losses (“NOL”) from 2008 or 2009 (but not both) for three, four or five years rather than the standard two years. As result of this one-time opportunity, the Company carried back $4.3 million of 2009’s NOL to prior periods and generated a significant portion of the expected federal tax refund approximating $1.0 million. The available NOL carryforward for the 2008 tax year totals $1.2 million.
8
Table of Contents
The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 consists of:
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Current provision: | | | | | |
U.S. | | $ | 45 | | $ | 227 | |
Foreign | | 117 | | 28 | |
| | 162 | | 255 | |
Deferred benefit: | | | | | |
U.S. | | — | | (940 | ) |
Foreign | | (169 | ) | (101 | ) |
| | (169 | ) | (1,041 | ) |
Total benefit | | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (786 | ) |
A reconciliation of the deferred tax amounts to the Consolidated Balance sheet follows:
| | March 31, | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
| | | | | |
Future tax benefit - U.S. | | $ | 2,142 | | $ | 2,114 | |
Valuation allowance - U.S. | | (2,142 | ) | (2,114 | ) |
Current deferred tax asset | | — | | — | |
| | | | | |
Future tax benefit - U.S. | | 6,267 | | 6,320 | |
Valuation allowance - U.S. | | (4,888 | ) | (4,603 | ) |
Non-current deferred tax asset | | 1,379 | | 1,717 | |
| | | | | |
Future tax liability - Foreign | | (6 | ) | (11 | ) |
Valuation allowance - U.S. | | (1,379 | ) | (1,717 | ) |
Current deferred tax liability | | (1,385 | ) | (1,728 | ) |
| | | | | |
Non-current deferred tax liability - Foreign | | (1,771 | ) | (1,935 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net deferred tax liability | | $ | (1,777 | ) | $ | (1,946 | ) |
(4) FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
On February 15, 2008, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (as amended, the “Loan Agreement”) with The PrivateBank and Trust Company, as lender and agent, and RBS Citizens, N.A., as lender, for a $5.7 million term loan facility and a $40 million revolving credit facility, both of which mature on October 19, 2011. Borrowings under the term loan were used to pay off the balance and close the term loan from the Company’s previous credit agreement. Borrowings under the new revolving credit facility were used to pay off and close the previous revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes. The Loan Agreement replaced the Company’s previous credit agreement.
On August 13, 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to the Loan Agreement. Pursuant to the amendment, the lenders waived the failure of the Company to comply as of June 30, 2009 with the financial covenants set forth in the Loan Agreement relating to Total Debt to EBITDA Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement) and Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement). In addition, the amendment decreased the maximum principal amount available to be borrowed by the Company pursuant to the revolving credit facility under the Loan Agreement from $40 million to $28 million. The Company paid an amendment fee of $159,150, as well as certain fees and expenses, in connection with the execution of the amendment. The amendment also amended the covenants set forth in the Loan Agreement to provide for the following financial covenants: minimum fixed charge coverage at revised levels from those contained in the Loan Agreement; minimum cumulative EBITDA; and minimum tangible net worth. Due to the continued impact of the global economic downturn and the preference of retail and distribution customers to defer third quarter purchases to the fourth quarter, the Company did not satisfy the financial covenants under the Loan
9
Table of Contents
Agreement for the third quarter of 2009. On November 2, 2009, the Company and the lenders under the Loan Agreement entered into an amendment to the Loan Agreement. Pursuant to the amendment, which was effective as of October 24, 2009, the lenders waived the covenant violations. The Company paid an amendment fee of $50,000, as well as certain fees and expenses of the lenders, in connection with execution of the amendment. As a result of three key accounts deferring sales to early 2010, the Company violated the minimum cumulative EBITDA loan covenant for the fourth quarter of 2009 but was in compliance with the fixed charge coverage and tangible net worth covenants. On March 12, 2010, the Company and the lenders under the Loan Agreement entered into an amendment to the Loan Agreement. Pursuant to the amendment, which was effective as of March 9, 2010, the lenders waived the covenant violation. The Company paid an amendment fee of $50,000, as well as certain fees and expenses of the lenders, in connection with execution of the amendment. The amendment also decreased the maximum principal amount available to be borrowed by the Company pursuant to the revolving credit facility under the Loan Agreement from $28 million to $23 million and eliminated the minimum cumulative EBITDA covenant. Commencing December 31, 2010, the loan commitment will be further reduced to $20 million. The amendment provides for two financial covenants, fixed charge coverage and tangible net worth. The fixed charge coverage covenant requires that the Company maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of 1.0 for the three quarter period ending March 31, 2010 and for the four quarter period ending June 30, 2010 and a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of 1.1 for each rolling four quarter period thereafter. As of March 31, 2010, the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio for the nine-month period ending on that date was 1.54. The tangible net worth covenant requires the Company to maintain tangible net worth as of the end of each quarter to $13.4 million, an amount based on 90 percent of the Company’s tangible net worth as of June 30, 2009, plus 50 percent of consolidated net income (but with no reduction for net losses) for each quarter that preceded that quarter being measured, excluding any gains or losses associated with the cash surrender value of life insurance. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had tangible net worth of $15.6 million as compared to a minimum requirement of $14.3 million. The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants as of March 31, 2010.
As amended, the Loan Agreement requires lockbox agreements, which provide for all Company receipts to be swept daily to reduce borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility. These agreements, combined with the existence of a material adverse change (“MAC”) clause in the Loan Agreement, result in the revolving credit facility being classified as a current liability. The Company does not expect to repay, or be required to repay, within one year, the balance of its revolving credit facility, which has a final expiration date of October 19, 2011. The MAC clause, which is a common requirement in commercial credit agreements, allows the lender to require the loan to become due if there has been a material adverse change in the Company’s financial condition, operations or other status.
Interest on amounts borrowed under the Loan Agreement is based on the prime rate plus an applicable margin, or LIBOR plus an applicable margin, with the applicable margin being determined based on the Total Debt to EBITDA Ratio for the prior four quarters, with the further requirement that qualifying for a reduction from the currently stipulated applicable margin requires that the Company achieve the designated Total Debt to EBITDA Ratio for two consecutive quarters. The applicable margin based on the Total Debt to EBITDA Ratio of the Company as of March 31, 2010 was 2.0 percent for prime rate loans and 4.5 percent for LIBOR loans. Availability under the revolving credit facility is calculated based on a borrowing base formula that includes 75 percent of eligible accounts receivable, the lesser of 60 percent of lower of cost or market value of eligible inventory or 85 percent of the appraised orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory, and 60 percent of commercial letters of credit issued for the purchase of inventory, subject to certain limitations and to reserves established at the lenders’ discretion, including but not limited to an availability reserve of $2.5 million through September 30, 2009, $3.0 million through April 21, 2010 and $2.5 million thereafter. The Loan Agreement requires an inventory appraisal, when deemed necessary by the lender, the results of which could lead to a reduction in the credit availability based on inventory. The inventory appraisal conducted as of June 30, 2009 did not affect credit availability. The revolving credit facility continues to be subject to an unused line fee of 0.5 percent and the term loan under the Loan Agreement is subject to quarterly principal payments by the Company of $310,000 for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 and $440,000 for each quarter thereafter through September 30, 2011. The term of the Loan Agreement continues to extend until October 19, 2011. Borrowings under the Loan Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company, including 65.0 percent of the equity in the non-U.S. subsidiaries.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had interest bearing debt outstanding of $13.7 million, consisting of the $2.6 million term loan and $11.1 million borrowed under the revolving credit facility. As of March 31, 2010, credit availability was approximately $2.7 million under the revolving credit facility, based on the borrowing base formula in effect at that time. The weighted average interest rate for the three months ending March 31, 2010 and 2009 were 6.9 percent and 3.5 percent, respectively. The Company entered into an interest rate swap on March 31, 2009, which fixed the interest rate on the term loan and a portion of the revolving credit facility at 3.47 percent.
10
Table of Contents
(5) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company’s financial instruments include cash, cash surrender value (“CSV”) of life insurance policies, accounts receivable, accounts payable, short-term debt, long-term debt and letters of credit. The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amounts of the Company’s bank borrowings under its Loan Agreement approximate fair value because the interest rates are reset periodically to reflect current market rates. The letters of credit approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of the instrument. The contract value/fair value of the letters of credit was $3.3 million at March 31, 2010 and $2.7 million at December 31, 2009. The carrying value of the CSV for the life insurance approximates fair value and is based on the market value of the underlying investments, which may increase or decrease due to fluctuations in the overall financial markets.
The Company has a derivative contract for an interest rate swap that is valued on a recurring basis using quoted market prices. This financial instrument is exchange-traded and is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because the exchange is not deemed to be an active market. The derivative was classified as a long-term liability on the balance sheet. Refer to Note 6, Derivatives, for additional information.
The following table provides the fair value information for the Company’s interest rate swap as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
| | March 31, 2010 | | December 31, 2009 | |
| | | | Fair Value | | | | Fair Value | |
| | | | | | Significant | | | | | | Significant | |
| | | | | | Other Observable | | | | | | Other Observable | |
| | Carrying | | Total | | Inputs | | Carrying | | Total | | Inputs | |
Liabilities | | Amount | | Fair Value | | (Level 2) | | Amount | | Fair Value | | (Level 2) | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Interest rate swap | | $ | 408 | | $ | 408 | | $ | 408 | | $ | 420 | | $ | 420 | | $ | 420 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(6) DERIVATIVES
The Company transacts business globally with various manufacturing and distribution facilities. The Company may reduce its exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates by creating offsetting positions through derivative financial instruments. The Company currently does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company regularly monitors foreign exchange exposures and ensures hedge contract amounts do not exceed the amounts of the underlying exposures.
The Company’s current hedging activity is limited to foreign currency purchases and an interest rate swap. The purpose of the foreign currency hedging activities is to protect the Company from the risk that eventual settlement of foreign currency transactions will be adversely affected by changes in exchange rates. The purpose of the interest rate swap is to fix the interest rate for the term of the revolving credit facility and term loan, thereby protecting the Company from future interest rate increases. The interest rate swap represents a cash flow hedge and is recorded at fair value and classified as a non-current liability. Changes in the recorded fair value of the interest rate swap are recorded to other comprehensive income. At March 31, 2009, the existing contract applicable to the term loan with a value of $250,000 was terminated and replaced with a contract applicable to the term loan and a portion of the revolving loan valued at $377,000. The $250,000 value of the terminated liability will be amortized through September 30, 2011.
The Company hedges foreign exchange exposures by entering into various short-term forward foreign exchange contracts. The instruments are carried at fair value in its Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of current liabilities. Changes in the fair value of foreign exchange forward contracts that meet the applicable hedging criteria are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of foreign exchange forward contracts that do not meet the applicable hedging criteria are recorded currently in income as cost of sales. Hedging activities did not have a material impact on results of operations or financial condition during the three month periods ending March 31, 2010 and 2009.
11
Table of Contents
At March 31, 2010, the Company did not have any open foreign exchange contracts. The carrying value of the interest rate swap totaled $408,000 at March 31, 2010 and $420,000 at December 31, 2009.
The fair value of outstanding derivative contracts designated as hedging instruments recorded as liabilities in the accompanying balance sheet were as follows:
| | | | March 31, | | December 31, | |
Liability Derivative | | Balance Sheet Location | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | (In thousands) | |
Interest rate swap | | Non-current liability | | $ | 408 | | $ | 420 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The effective portion of the gain (loss) on outstanding derivatives recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”) for the three-month periods ending March 31, 2010 and 2009 follows:
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Interest rate swap | | $ | 12 | | $ | (201 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
The effective portion of the gain reclassified from Accumulated Comprehensive Other Income into Income during the three months ending Mach 31, 2010 and 2009 follows:
Income Statement Location | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Interest expense | | $ | 33 | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | |
12
Table of Contents
(7) (LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings (loss) per share excludes any dilution and is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock resulted in the issuance of common stock. If the common stock equivalents have an anti-dilutive effect, they are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share. The loss per share for the three months ending March 31, 2010 and 2009 follows:
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | (In Thousands, Except Share Data) | |
Basic loss per share: | | | | | |
Net loss available to Cobra shareholders | | $ | (1,317 | ) | $ | (1,616 | ) |
Weighted-average shares outstanding | | 6,471,280 | | 6,471,280 | |
| | | | | |
Basic loss per share | | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) |
| | | | | |
Weighted-average shares outstanding | | 6,471,280 | | 6,471,280 | |
Dilutive shares issuable in connection with stock option plans (a) | | — | | — | |
Less: shares purchasable with option proceeds | | — | | — | |
Total | | 6,471,280 | | 6,471,280 | |
| | | | | |
Diluted loss per share | | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) |
(a) | Stock options to purchase 447,780 shares for the three months ending March 31, 2010 and 509,296 shares for the three months ending March 31, 2009 were not included in the calculation for the dilutive loss per share since the exercise price was above market price |
(8) COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise from transactions and other events from non-owner sources. Comprehensive income (loss) includes net earnings (loss) and other non-owner changes in equity that bypass the statement of operations and are reported in a separate component of equity. For the three months ending March 31, 2010 and 2009, other comprehensive income (loss) includes the foreign currency translation adjustment and an interest rate swap. The cumulative balance of the comprehensive loss at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 follows:
| | March 31, | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | $ | (2,284 | ) | $ | (1,585 | ) |
Interest rate swap - gross | | (292 | ) | (304 | ) |
Total | | $ | (2,576 | ) | $ | (1,889 | ) |
13
Table of Contents
A summary of the Comprehensive Loss for the three-month periods ending March 31, 2010 and 2009 follows:
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Net loss attributable to Cobra | | $ | (1,317 | ) | $ | (1,616 | ) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment (no tax effect) | | (699 | ) | (383 | ) |
Interest rate swap and foreign exchange (net of applicable tax) | | 12 | | (201 | ) |
Total comprehensive loss | | $ | (2,004 | ) | $ | (2,200 | ) |
(9) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company is subject to various unresolved legal actions which arise in the normal course of its business. None of these matters are expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. However, the ultimate resolution of these matters can not be determined at this time.
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding inventory purchase orders with suppliers totaling approximately $19.9 million and $17.7 million, respectively.
(10) OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
The following table summarizes the components of other current assets at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
| | March 31, | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Prepaid assets | | $ | 1,592 | | $ | 1,523 | |
Tax refunds and receivables | | 1,068 | | 1,060 | |
Vendor and miscellaneous receivables | | 1,545 | | 1,378 | |
| | $ | 4,205 | | $ | 3,961 | |
14
Table of Contents
(11) PRODUCT WARRANTY COSTS AND INVENTORY VALUATION RESERVES
The Company warrants to the consumer who purchases its products that it will repair or replace, without charge, defective products within a specified time period, generally one year. The Company also has a return policy for its customers that allows customers to return to the Company products returned to them by their customers for full or partial credit based on when the Company’s customer last purchased these products. Consequently, it maintains a warranty reserve, which reflects historical warranty return rates by product category multiplied by the most recent six months of unit sales of that model and the unit standard cost of the model. A roll-forward of the warranty reserve follows:
| | Three Months | | Year | |
| | Ended | | Ended | |
| | March 31, | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Accrued product warranty costs, beginning of period | | $ | 857 | | $ | 897 | |
Warranty provision | | 423 | | 2,459 | |
Warranty expenditures | | (576 | ) | (2,499 | ) |
Accrued product warranty costs, end of period | | $ | 704 | | $ | 857 | |
The Company maintains a liquidation reserve representing the write-down of returned product from its customers to its net realizable value. Returned inventory is either sold to various liquidators or returned to vendors for partial credit against similar, new models. The decision to sell or return products to vendors depends upon the estimated future demand for the models. Judgments are made as to whether various models are to be liquidated or returned to the vendor, taking into consideration the liquidation prices expected to be received and the amount of the vendor credit. The amount of the reserve is determined by comparing the cost of each unit returned to the estimated amount to be realized upon each unit’s disposition, either from returning the unit to the vendor for partial credit towards the cost of new, similar product or liquidating the unit. This reserve can fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter depending upon quantities of returned inventory on-hand and the estimated liquidation price or vendor credit per unit. A roll-forward of the liquidation reserve follows:
| | Three Months | | Year | |
| | Ended | | Ended | |
| | March 31, | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Liquidation reserve, beginning of period | | $ | 648 | | $ | 623 | |
Liquidation provision | | 371 | | 2,650 | |
Liquidation of models | | (319 | ) | (2,625 | ) |
Liquidation reserve, end of period | | $ | 700 | | $ | 648 | |
15
Table of Contents
The Company maintains a net realizable value (“NRV”) reserve to write-down, as necessary, certain finished goods, except for those goods covered by the previously discussed liquidation reserve, below cost. The reserve includes models where it is determined that the estimated realizable value is less than cost. Thus, judgments must be made about which slow-moving, excess or non-current models are to be included in the reserve and the NRV of such models. The estimated NRV of each model is the per unit price that is estimated to be received if the model were sold in the marketplace. This reserve will vary depending upon the specific models selected, the estimated NRV for each model and quantities of each model that are determined will be sold below cost from quarter to quarter. A roll-forward of the NRV reserve follows:
| | Three Months | | Year | |
| | Ended | | Ended | |
| | March 31, | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Net realizable reserve, beginning of period | | $ | 238 | | $ | 109 | |
NRV provision | | 77 | | 427 | |
NRV write-offs | | (81 | ) | (298 | ) |
Net realizable reserve, end of period | | $ | 234 | | $ | 238 | |
(12) OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
The following table shows the components of other income (expense) for the three-month periods ending March 31, 2010 and 2009:
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Interest income | | $ | — | | $ | 4 | |
CSV income (loss) | | 69 | | (279 | ) |
Exchange loss | | (49 | ) | (26 | ) |
Other (loss) income | | (45 | ) | 44 | |
| | $ | (25 | ) | $ | (257 | ) |
16
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Executive Summary
Pre-tax loss for the first quarter of 2010 totaled $1.3 million compared to the pre-tax loss of $2.4 million for the year ago period. Key factors contributing to the pre-tax loss were:
· Net sales increased $2.0 million, or 10.5 percent, principally due to Citizens Band radios, marine radios and satellite navigation sales.
· Gross profit increased by $788,000 due to higher sales. Gross margin increased by 1.2 percent to 27.7 percent due to favorable product mix.
· Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $170,000, or 2.4 percent, due to management’s effort to reduce spending and lower fixed costs.
· Interest expense increased by $113,000 due to higher interest rates.
· Other expenses decreased by $232,000 mainly due to cash surrender value (CSV) of life insurance income.
The combined impact of the foregoing factors was a $1.1 million decrease in the pre-tax loss in the first quarter of 2010 from the first quarter of 2009.
The effective tax rate for first quarter of 2010 was 0.5 percent compared to 32.7 percent for the first quarter of 2009. The lower effective tax rate for 2010 as compared to 2009 is due to the continuing impact of the U.S. deferred tax valuation allowance initiated in 2009.
Outlook
The Company anticipates returning to profitability in 2010, as it drives the business forward with new products, new distribution and new marketing channels. The improvement in the Company’s results for the first quarter of 2010 was built on this strategic thrust. Due to the tenuous nature of the economic recovery, particularly in Europe, the Company will maintain its focus on containing expenses and managing working capital.
17
Table of Contents
EBITDA
The following table shows the reconciliation of net loss to EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined for three months ending March 31, 2010 and 2009:
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Net loss | | $ | (1,317 | ) | $ | (1,616 | ) |
Depreciation/amortization | | 950 | | 978 | |
Interest expense | | 263 | | 150 | |
Income tax provision | | (7 | ) | (786 | ) |
EBITDA | | (111 | ) | (1,274 | ) |
Stock option expense | | 56 | | 59 | |
CSV (income) loss | | (69 | ) | 279 | |
Non-controlling interest | | — | | 1 | |
Other non-cash items | | 569 | | 53 | |
EBITDA As Defined | | $ | 445 | | $ | (882 | ) |
EBITDA represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA As Defined represents EBITDA plus the applicable adjustments required to agree with the EBITDA measurement for compliance with the financial covenants of the Company’s lenders. The Company believes EBITDA is a useful performance indicator and is frequently used by management, securities analysts and investors to judge operating performance between time periods and among other companies. The Company uses EBITDA As Defined to assess operating performance and ensure compliance with financial covenants.
EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined are non-GAAP performance indicators that should be used in conjunction with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) performance measurements such as net sales, operating profit and net income to evaluate the Company’s operating performance. EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined are not alternatives to net income or cash flow from operations determined in accordance with GAAP. Furthermore, EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined may not be comparable to the calculation of similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
18
Table of Contents
First Quarter 2010 Compared to First Quarter 2009
The following table contains sales and pre-tax loss after eliminating intercompany accounts by business segment for the quarter ending March 31, 2010 and 2009:
| | | | | | | | | | 2010 vs. 2009 | |
| | 2010 | | 2009 | | Increase | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
| | Net | | Pre-tax | | Net | | Pre-tax | | Net | | Pre-tax | |
Business Segment | | Sales | | Profit (Loss) | | Sales | | Loss | | Sales | | Profit | |
Cobra | | $ | 17,555 | | $ | (1,439 | ) | $ | 17,248 | | $ | (2,200 | ) | $ | 307 | | $ | 761 | |
PPL | | 3,528 | | 115 | | 1,837 | | (201 | ) | 1,691 | | 316 | |
Total Company | | $ | 21,083 | | $ | (1,324 | ) | $ | 19,085 | | $ | (2,401 | ) | $ | 1,998 | | $ | 1,077 | |
Cobra Business Segment
Cobra net sales increased $307,000, or 1.8 percent, in the first quarter of 2010 to $17.6 million compared to $17.3 million in the first quarter of 2009. Higher sales of Citizens Band and two-way radios and sales of the mobile navigation product for the professional driver, introduced in the second half of 2009, more than offset lower detection sales. The increase in Citizens Band radio sales reflected a pick up in buying by professional drivers as they benefitted from a gradual improvement in truck shipment tonnage. Two-way radio sales were higher because of an exclusive supply agreement with a major retailer that began in the second quarter of 2009 as well as increased promotional activities at certain major retailers that helped drive sales. The lower detection sales were due to load-in shipments in the prior year’s quarter for two major retailers, one of which was a new detection customer at the beginning of 2009 while the other switched over to new models in the first quarter of 2009.
Gross profit increased $331,000 to $4.6 million for the first quarter of 2010 while gross margin increased to 26.2 percent from 24.7 percent in the prior year’s quarter. The improved gross margin was due to a more favorable product mix as consumers, particularly professional drivers, began increasing purchases, including purchases of higher margin products. Also contributing to the gross margin improvement were reductions in the costs of certain models without corresponding declines in selling prices and lower sales of older products that would require price concessions to accelerate sell-through.
Selling, general and administrative expenses declined $276,000, or 4.5 percent, to $5.8 million in the current quarter from $6.1 million in the first quarter of 2009, and as a percentage of net sales was 33.0 percent and 35.2 percent, respectively. The decline was due to a decrease in fixed selling, general and administrative costs that more than offset the increase in variable selling costs, which increased $135,000 or 12.7 percent, primarily due to higher domestic sales volume. Fixed costs decreased $411,000, or 8.2 percent due to cost savings measures implemented by management, including headcount reductions.
Interest expense increased by $113,000 to $263,000 in the first quarter of 2010 due to higher interest rates for the first three months of 2010 as compared to 2009. Other income was $33,000 for the first quarter of 2010 compared to other expense of $234,000 in the prior year’s quarter. This favorable swing was primarily due to $69,000 of CSV income for the first quarter of 2010 compared to $279,000 of CSV expense for the first quarter of 2009. The CSV of life insurance policies is affected by the market value of the underlying investments and adverse market conditions may result in a non-cash expense.
As a result of the above, the Cobra segment had a pre-tax loss of $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to pre-tax loss of $2.2 million in the first quarter of 2009.
19
Table of Contents
Performance Products Limited (“PPL”) Business Segment
PPL’s net sales increased $1.7 million or 92.1 percent, to $3.5 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to $1.8 million reported for the year ago quarter. Most of the increase was due to higher sales of satellite navigation products, mostly due to strong demand for the Truckmate™ personal navigation device with dedicated routing within the UK and Europe for trucks, buses, motor homes and other large vehicles. Also contributing to the sales increase were strong sales of outdoor leisure GPS products.
Gross profit was $1.3 million in the current quarter compared to $801,000 in the prior year’s quarter, while gross margin was 35.7 percent and 43.6 percent, respectively. The decline in gross margin was mainly due to an unfavorable sales mix and more sales to PPL’s expanding distribution channels outside of its core UK market where separate fees are not charged for downloads.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $106,000, or 10.8 percent, higher than the first quarter of 2009 and due mainly to foreign exchange, as local currency spending increased by only 2.1 percent. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 30.8 percent in 2010 from 53.3 percent in the first quarter of 2009 due to the effect of higher sales in 2010 as compared to the first quarter of 2009.
PPL had other expense of $58,000 in the first quarter of 2010 compared to other expense of $23,000 in the prior year’s quarter. The decrease was mainly due to a higher foreign exchange loss in the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the first quarter of 2009.
As a result of the above, the PPL segment had pre-tax income of $115,000 for the first quarter of 2010 compared to $201,000 of pre-tax loss for the first quarter of 2009.
20
Table of Contents
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At March 31, 2010, the Company had interest bearing debt outstanding of $13.7 million, consisting of the $2.6 million term loan and $11.1 million borrowed under the revolving credit facility. As of March 31, 2010, credit availability was approximately $2.7 million under the revolving credit facility, based on the borrowing base formula in effect at that time. The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants as of March 31, 2010.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, net cash flows provided by operating activities totaled $4.0 million. Significant net cash inflows from operations and non-cash add-backs included a decrease in accounts receivable of $4.8 million, non-cash depreciation and amortization of $950,000 and an increase in accounts payable of $597,000. The decrease in accounts receivable was primarily due to collections on sales from the fourth quarter of 2009. The increase in accounts payable was mainly due to inventory and capital expenditures. Partially offsetting these inflows was the net loss of $1.3 million, a decrease in accrued liabilities, mainly lower promotional and warranty costs due to the sales decline from the prior quarter, totaling $447,000, and an increase of $460,000 in other assets, mainly prepayments and vendor receivables.
Working capital requirements are seasonal, with demand for working capital being higher later in the year as customers begin purchasing for the holiday selling season. The Company believes that cash generated from operations and from borrowings under its Loan Agreement will be sufficient in 2010 to fund its working capital needs.
Net cash used in investing activities for the first three months of 2010 totaled $438,000. $131,000 was due to an increase in intangible assets, $172,000 was used for PP&E expenditures, primarily tooling and machinery and equipment, and $135,000 was due to the premiums payments for life insurance.
Net cash used by financing activities in the first three months of 2010 totaled $4.1 million and was used to reduce bank debt. The Company is not expected to pay a dividend in 2010. The cash used in 2010 for financing activities will most likely be limited to debt reduction.
A failure to comply, absent a waiver from lenders, with the covenants contained in the Loan Agreement in future periods could result in any outstanding indebtedness under the Loan Agreement becoming immediately due and payable and in the inability to borrow additional funds under the Loan Agreement. The Company believes that for the foreseeable future, it will be able to continue to fund its operations and seasonal working capital requirements with cash generated from operations and borrowings under the Loan Agreement or similar future credit agreement.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Critical accounting policies and estimates generally consist of those that reflect significant judgments and uncertainties and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions. For a description of the Company’s critical accounting polices and estimates refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The application of certain of these policies requires significant judgments or a historical based estimation process that can affect the results of operations and financial position of the Company as well as the related footnote disclosures. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that it believes are reasonable. If actual amounts ultimately differ from previous estimates, the revisions are included in the Company’s results of operations for the period in which the actual amounts become known.
21
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of that term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 found at Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Additional written or oral forward-looking statements may be made by the Company from time to time in filings with the SEC, press releases, or otherwise. Statements contained in this report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, projections of revenue, income or loss and capital expenditures, statements regarding future operations, anticipated financing needs, compliance with financial covenants in loan agreements, liquidity, plans for acquisitions or sales of assets or businesses, plans relating to products or services, assessments of materiality, expansion into international markets, growth trends in the consumer electronics business, technological and market developments in the consumer electronics business, the availability of new consumer electronics products and predictions of future events, as well as assumptions relating to these statements. In addition, when used in this report, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “should,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans” and variations thereof and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified based on current expectations. Consequently, future events and actual results could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by or underlying the forward-looking statements contained in this report or in other Company filings, press releases, or otherwise. Factors that could contribute to or cause such differences include, but are not limited to, unanticipated developments in any one or more of the following areas:
· global economic and market conditions, including continuation of or changes in the current economic environment;
· ability of the Company to introduce new products to meet consumer needs, including timely introductions as new consumer technologies are introduced, and customer and consumer acceptance of these new product introductions;
· pressure for the Company to reduce prices for older products as newer technologies are introduced;
· significant competition in the consumer electronics business, including introduction of new products and changes in pricing;
· factors related to foreign manufacturing, sourcing and sales (including foreign government regulation, trade and importation, and health and safety concerns, and effects of fluctuation in exchange rates);
· ability of the Company to maintain adequate financing, to bear the interest cost of such financing and to remain in compliance with financing covenants;
· impairment of intangible assets due to market conditions and/or the Company’s operating results;
· changes in law;
· ability to successfully integrate acquisitions;
· and other risk factors, which may be detailed from time to time in the Company’s SEC filings.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements contained in this report, which speak only as of the date set forth on the signature page hereto. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after such date or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
22
Table of Contents
Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange risks and interest rates are inherent to the Company’s operations. Changes to these factors could cause fluctuations in the Company’s net earnings, cash flows and the fair values of financial instruments subject to market risks. The Company identifies these risks and mitigates the financial impact with hedging and interest rate swaps.
There have been no material changes in the Company’s market risk since December 31, 2009.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures have also been designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of March 31, 2010.
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the first three months of 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
23
Table of Contents
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed under Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 5. Other Information
On May 11, 2010, the Company held an annual meeting of its shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”). Of the 6,471,280 shares of the Company’s common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, 5,487,942 shares were present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, which constituted a quorum. Set forth below are the matters acted upon by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting and the final voting results of each such matter.
Proposal One — Election of Directors. In accordance with the voting results listed below, each nominee to serve as a Class III director was elected for a three-year term expiring at the 2013 Annual Meeting.
Nominee | | Votes For | | Votes Withheld | | Broker Non-Votes | |
John S. Lupo | | 3,436,975 | | 279,643 | | 1,771,324 | |
Ian R. Miller | | 2,851,006 | | 865,612 | | 1,771,324 | |
Proposal Two — Ratification of the Appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as Independent Registered Public Accountants for the Year Ending December 31, 2010. In accordance with the voting results listed below, the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP to serve the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2010 was ratified.
Votes For | | Votes Against | | Abstentions | | Broker Non-Votes | |
5,278,376 | | 75,701 | | 133,864 | | 0 | |
Proposal Three — Approval of the Cobra Electronics Corporation 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. In accordance with the voting results listed below, the Cobra Electronics Corporation 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was approved.
Votes For | | Votes Against | | Abstentions | | Broker Non-Votes | |
2,507,236 | | 1,182,607 | | 26,773 | | 1,771,324 | |
The Plan became effective on May 11, 2010 and will terminate on the date of the first annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders to occur on or after May 11, 2020, unless terminated earlier by the Board of Directors. The Plan replaces the 2000 Stock Option Plan (which expired March 31, 2010) and the 2002 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan.
All officers, employees and non-employee directors of the Company and its subsidiaries and persons expected to become officers, employees or non-employee directors of the Company and its subsidiaries are eligible to receive awards under the Plan. There are approximately 150 employees of the Company who are currently eligible to participate under the Plan. There are also five non-employee directors of the Company who are currently eligible to participate under the Plan.
Awards under the Plan include non-qualified and incentive stock options, stock-settled stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, unrestricted stock, restricted stock units and performance units, any or all of which may be made contingent upon the achievement of performance criteria. Subject to adjustment for stock splits and other changes in capitalization, (i) the maximum number of shares available under the Plan for restricted stock, unrestricted stock, restricted stock unit awards and performance unit awards settled with stock (i.e., all awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights) is 800,000; (ii) the maximum number of shares with respect to which options or stock appreciation rights or a combination thereof may be granted during any fiscal year to any person is 300,000; (iii) the maximum number of shares with respect to which performance-based restricted stock or restricted stock units may be granted during any fiscal year to any person is 100,000; and (iv) the maximum amount that may be payable with respect to performance units granted during any fiscal year of the Company to any person is $1,000,000.
24
Table of Contents
The Stock Option Plan Committee, which is made up entirely of independent directors, is responsible for interpreting, construing and administering the Plan. The Stock Option Plan Committee has the authority to determine the participants in the Plan, the form, amount and timing of any awards (subject to Plan limits), the performance goals, if any, and all other terms and conditions pertaining to any award.
The foregoing description of the Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Plan document, which is filed as Exhibit 10.2 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and incorporated herein.
Item 6. Exhibits
a) | Exhibit 10.1 2010 Executive Incentive Payment Plan. |
| |
b) | Exhibit 10.2 Cobra Electronics Corporation 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. |
| |
c) | Exhibit 10.3 Fifth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement and Waiver, effective April 9, 2010, among Cobra Electronics Corporation, The PrivateBank and Trust Company as lender and administrative agent for itself and other lenders and RBS Citizens, N.A., as lender. |
| |
d) | Exhibit 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. |
| |
e) | Exhibit 31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |
| |
f) | Exhibit 32.1 Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. |
| |
g) | Exhibit 32.2 Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |
25
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | COBRA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION |
| | | |
| | By | /s/ Michael Smith |
| | | |
| | | Michael Smith |
| | | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| | | (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
Dated: May 14, 2010
26
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit | | |
Number | | Description of Document |
| | |
10.1 | | 2010 Executive Incentive Payment Plan. |
| | |
10.2 | | Cobra Electronics Corporation 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. |
| | |
10.3 | | Fifth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement and Waiver, effective April 9, 2010, among Cobra Electronics Corporation, The PrivateBank and Trust Company as lender and administrative agent for itself and other lenders and RBS Citizens, N.A., as lender. |
| | |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. |
| | |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |
| | |
32.1 | | Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. |
| | |
32.2 | | Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |
27