Fundamental InvestorsSM
[photo of a photo lens in a person's hand]
Special feature
Opportunity up close
See page 6
Annual report for the year ended December 31, 2011
Fundamental Investors seeks long-term growth of capital and income.
This fund is one of the 33 American Funds. American Funds is one of the nation’s largest mutual fund families. For more than 80 years, Capital Research and Management Company,SM the American Funds adviser, has invested with a long-term focus based on thorough research and attention to risk.
Fund results shown in this report, unless otherwise indicated, are for Class A shares at net asset value. If a sales charge (maximum 5.75%) had been deducted, the results would have been lower. Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. Investing for short periods makes losses more likely. Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
See page 4 for Class A share results with relevant sales charges deducted. Results for other share classes can be found on page 34.
Investment results assume all distributions are reinvested and reflect applicable fees and expenses. The fund’s investment adviser waived a portion of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through December 31, 2008. Applicable fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. See the Financial Highlights table on pages 27 and 28 for details.
The fund’s 30-day yield for Class A shares as of January 31, 2012, calculated in accordance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission formula, was 1.57%. The fund’s distribution rate for Class A shares as of that date was 1.56%. Both reflect the 5.75% maximum sales charge. The SEC yield reflects the rate at which the fund is earning income on its current portfolio of securities while the distribution rate reflects the fund’s past dividends paid to shareholders. Accordingly, the fund’s SEC yield and distribution rate may differ.
Investing outside the United States may be subject to risks, such as currency fluctuations, periods of illiquidity and price volatility. These risks may be heightened in connection with investments in developing countries. See the prospectus and the Risk Factors section of this report for more information on these and other risks associated with investing in the fund.
Fellow investors:
A year notable for its many challenges saw Fundamental Investors register a decline of 1.9% for those who reinvested dividends totaling 62 cents a share.
The fund’s results trailed the 2.1% return of its primary benchmark, the unmanaged Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index, a broad measure of the U.S. stock market.
However, the fund outpaced the 5.0% drop of the unmanaged MSCI World Index, a gauge of markets in more than 20 developed countries. We cite results for this index because the fund is able to invest up to 35% of its assets in companies domiciled outside the U.S. Though in 2011 non-U.S. holdings fell well short of this limit, companies headquartered abroad nonetheless proved a drag on results. So too did currency translation, as most major currencies weakened against the U.S. dollar — reducing returns for those whose investments are denominated in the dollar.
Though as a group non-U.S. investments did not support results, it’s important to point out that having the flexibility to invest in what we believe are the best companies wherever they are located has been instrumental to pursuing our long-term growth and income objectives.
The successful pursuit of these objectives is evident in the table below, which reveals that the fund has outpaced the S&P 500, the MSCI World Index and its Lipper peers for all the longer time periods shown.
[Begin Sidebar]
Results at a glance | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For periods ended December 31, 2011, with all distributions reinvested | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total returns | | | Average annual total returns | |
| | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | 10 years | | | Lifetime* | |
Fundamental Investors | | | –1.9 | % | | | 0.4 | % | | | 5.4 | % | | | 12.1 | % |
(Class A shares) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Standard & Poor’s | | | 2.1 | | | | –0.2 | | | | 2.9 | | | | 11.0 | |
500 Composite Index† | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lipper Growth and | | | –1.8 | | | | –1.2 | | | | 3.1 | | | | 10.3 | |
Income Funds Index | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MSCI World Index† | | | –5.0 | | | | –1.8 | | | | 4.2 | | | | 10.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
*Since Capital Research and Management Company began managing the fund on August 1, 1978. | | | | | | | | | |
†The indexes are unmanaged and, therefore, have no expenses. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
[End Sidebar]
[photo of a photo lens in a person's hand]
[Begin Sidebar]
In this report | |
| |
| Special feature |
| |
6 | Opportunity up close: |
| A look at some of Fundamental Investors’ holdings offers room for optimism. |
| |
| |
| Contents |
| |
1 | Letter to investors |
| |
4 | Results of a $10,000 investment in Fundamental Investors |
| |
12 | Summary investment portfolio |
| |
16 | Financial statements |
| |
35 | Board of trustees and other officers |
[End Sidebar]
A volatile year
The rising stock market of 2010 continued into early 2011 as strong corporate earnings and indications of economic recovery continued to lift equity prices. By late spring, however, the increasingly tenuous financial condition of a number of European nations weighed heavily on global markets — which were also feeling the impact of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami.
Adding to the European debt woes was Standard & Poor’s downgrading of the U.S. credit rating, which sent indexes sharply lower throughout the summer and into early fall. Third quarter returns were the worst they had been since the onset of the 2008 financial crisis. However, the final months of the year saw growing investor optimism, with indexes driven higher by improving economic data in the U.S. as well as increasing conviction that European leaders were getting more serious about addressing the region’s challenges.
Sector returns reflect broader concerns
Returns for certain sectors reflected the volatile conditions and investor wariness that characterized the period. Broadly speaking, defensive areas such as health care, utilities and consumer staples posted higher returns than industries such as energy, materials and industrials that generally respond favorably to a clearer and brighter economic outlook.
Similarities and differences
Results for several of Fundamental Investors’ larger holdings mirrored the market’s pattern. For example, Bristol-Myers Squibb (33.1%), Verizon Communications (12.1%) and Philip Morris International (34.1%), all of which could be considered more defensive investments, recorded sharp gains, while the more economically sensitive Dow Chemical (–15.8%) lagged.
Yet among the 10 largest holdings were several reminders that companies can buck the broader forces at work in the investment environment. For example, Home Depot (19.9%) posted excellent returns despite the sluggish economy and continued housing weakness. Similarly, Apple (25.6%) outpaced the relatively flat results turned in by the information technology sector as a whole. (For a closer look at some other companies that investment professionals believe have the potential to fare well even if investing conditions remain turbulent, please turn to the feature article on page 6.)
Other top 10 holdings posting gains were railroad operator Union Pacific (14.3%) and energy giant Royal Dutch Shell (10.2%), both of which bested the fairly lackluster returns of their respective sectors. Drug maker Merck (4.6%) likewise rose.
Naturally, not all fund investments thrived. Top 10 holding Microsoft (–7.0%) finished in the red, while Wells Fargo (–11.1%), Texas Instruments (–10.4%) and longtime holding Suncor Energy (–25.1%) were among top 20 holdings that fell.
Given the continuing challenges facing the banking system, it’s not surprising that stocks of financial firms experienced some of the worst drops. Goldman Sachs (–46.2%), Citigroup (–44.4%) and SunTrust Banks (–40.0%) recorded some of the biggest losses. However, it’s important to note that financial companies make up a smaller proportion of the fund than is found in the S&P 500.
Tangible return is welcome
Many of the firms and sectors that held up well during the period have something in common beyond being somewhat defensive in nature: a healthy dividend yield. Amid uncertainty, investors often gravitate to the tangible return offered by companies that pay regular quarterly dividends. This was the case during the 12 months when high-yielding companies led the market.
[Begin Sidebar]
Fundamental Investors’ total return year by year (ending December 31) | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Capital return | | | Income return | | | Total return | |
2002 | | | –19.1 | % | | | 1.8 | % | | | –17.3 | % |
2003 | | | 30.2 | | | | 1.8 | | | | 32.0 | |
2004 | | | 11.9 | | | | 2.0 | | | | 13.9 | |
2005 | | | 9.9 | | | | 1.8 | | | | 11.7 | |
2006 | | | 17.6 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 19.2 | |
2007 | | | 11.2 | | | | 2.4 | | | | 13.6 | |
2008 | | | –41.1 | | | | 1.4 | | | | –39.7 | |
2009 | | | 31.5 | | | | 1.9 | | | | 33.4 | |
2010 | | | 12.2 | | | | 1.8 | | | | 14.0 | |
2011 | | | –3.6 | | | | 1.7 | | | | –1.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
10-year average annual total return | | | | | | | | | | | 5.4 | % |
10-year cumulative total return | | | | | | | | | | | 69.1 | |
Lifetime cumulative total return (since 8/1/78) | | | | | | | | | | | 4,400.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return measures both capital results (changes in net asset value) and income return (from dividends). | | | | | | | | | | | | |
All returns assume reinvestment of all dividends and capital gain distributions. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
[End Sidebar]
The dividends paid by Fundamental Investors have always represented a meaningful share of the fund’s overall return, and we remain committed to this aspect of the fund’s mission. This year the fund increased its quarterly payout and paid a special dividend of 12.5 cents a share in December.
A careful eye on the horizon
Looking ahead, we are paying careful attention to Europe and believe that increased stability there could translate into better results for some of the cyclical companies that have been solid contributors to results over the past few years.
In evaluating potential investments there and elsewhere, we will aim to strike a balance between seizing opportunity and managing the uncertainty that has always been part of equity investing.
We thank you for your commitment to Fundamental Investors.
Sincerely,
/s/ James F. Rothenberg
James F. Rothenberg
Vice Chairman
/s/ Dina N. Perry
Dina N. Perry
President
February 8, 2012
For current information about the fund, visit americanfunds.com.
[Begin Sidebar]
We are deeply saddened by the loss of Jon B. Lovelace Jr., chairman emeritus and former portfolio counselor of Capital Research and Management Company, and former chairman of The Capital Group Companies, Inc.
Nearly every aspect of the Capital Group bears some stamp of Jon’s leadership and service from 1951 until 2005. He was one of the principal architects of our Multiple Portfolio Counselor System, an early proponent of international investing, the founder of New Perspective Fund and Capital Income Builder, and a standard-bearer of the Capital Group’s mission to serve investors.
Though he never sought the spotlight, his accomplishments in life, work and philanthropy will long be remembered.
[End Sidebar]
Results of a $10,000 investment in Fundamental Investors
How a $10,000 investment has grown
The chart and the table below it illustrate how a $10,000 investment in the fund grew between August 1, 1978 — when Capital Research and Management Company became Fundamental Investors’ investment adviser — and December 31, 2011. The chart also shows how the unmanaged Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index and the Lipper Growth and Income Funds Index fared over this same period, and what happened to inflation (as measured by the Consumer Price Index).
Average annual total returns based on a $1,000 investment (for periods ended December 31, 2011)* | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | 10 years | |
Class A shares | | | –7.54 | % | | | –0.75 | % | | | 4.77 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
*Assumes reinvestment of all distributions and payment of the maximum 5.75% sales charge. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The total annual fund operating expense ratio is 0.63% for Class A shares as of the prospectus dated March 1, 2012 (unaudited).
Investment results assume all distributions are reinvested and reflect applicable fees and expenses. The fund’s investment adviser waived a portion of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through December 31, 2008. Applicable fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. See the Financial Highlights table on pages 27 and 28 for details.
Fund results shown are for Class A shares and reflect deduction of the maximum sales charge of 5.75% on the $10,000 investment.1 Thus, the net amount invested was $9,425.2 Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
[begin mountain chart]
| | | Fundamental Investors with dividends reinvested1,3 | | Fundamental Investors not including dividends1,6 | | | | S&P 500 Index with dividends reinvested4 | | | | Lipper Growth and Income Funds Index with dividends reinvested5 | | Consumer Price Index (inflation)7 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Initial Investment | 7/31/1978 | $9,425 | | $9,425 | | | | $10,000 | | | | $ 10,000 | | | | $10,000 |
19784 | High | 11-Sep-78 | 10,000 | | 9,919 | | High | 12-Sep-78 | 10,670 | | High | 31-Aug-78 | 10,369 | | High | 29-Dec-78 | 10,304 |
| Low | 14-Nov-78 | 8,667 | | 8,596 | | Low | 14-Nov-78 | 9,306 | | Low | 31-Oct-78 | 9,237 | | Low | 31-Jul-78 | 10,000 |
| Close | 29-Dec-78 | 9,155 | | 8,947 | | Close | 29-Dec-78 | 9,762 | | Close | 29-Dec-78 | 9,684 | | Close | 29-Dec-78 | 10,304 |
1979 | High | 5-Oct-79 | 10,823 | | 10,310 | | High | 5-Oct-79 | 11,769 | | High | 31-Dec-79 | 11,995 | | High | 31-Dec-79 | 11,674 |
| Low | 27-Feb-79 | 9,086 | | 8,880 | | Low | 27-Feb-79 | 9,807 | | Low | 28-Feb-79 | 9,822 | | Low | 31-Jan-79 | 10,396 |
| Close | 31-Dec-79 | 10,556 | | 9,892 | | Close | 31-Dec-79 | 11,579 | | Close | 31-Dec-79 | 11,995 | | Close | 31-Dec-79 | 11,674 |
1980 | High | 20-Nov-80 | 13,131 | | 11,876 | | High | 28-Nov-80 | 15,813 | | High | 30-Nov-80 | 15,695 | | High | 31-Dec-80 | 13,135 |
| Low | 21-Apr-80 | 9,625 | | 8,907 | | Low | 27-Mar-80 | 10,627 | | Low | 31-Mar-80 | 11,317 | | Low | 31-Jan-80 | 11,842 |
| Close | 31-Dec-80 | 12,807 | | 11,390 | | Close | 31-Dec-80 | 15,336 | | Close | 31-Dec-80 | 15,386 | | Close | 31-Dec-80 | 13,135 |
1981 | High | 27-Apr-81 | 13,986 | | 12,308 | | High | 6-Jan-81 | 15,603 | | High | 31-May-81 | 15,965 | | High | 31-Dec-81 | 14,307 |
| Low | 25-Sep-81 | 11,906 | | 10,243 | | Low | 25-Sep-81 | 13,172 | | Low | 30-Sep-81 | 14,172 | | Low | 31-Jan-81 | 13,242 |
| Close | 31-Dec-81 | 12,654 | | 10,688 | | Close | 31-Dec-81 | 14,581 | | Close | 31-Dec-81 | 15,172 | | Close | 31-Dec-81 | 14,307 |
1982 | High | 7-Dec-82 | 17,346 | | 13,833 | | High | 9-Nov-82 | 17,877 | | High | 31-Dec-82 | 18,839 | | High | 31-Oct-82 | 14,947 |
| Low | 22-Jan-82 | 10,593 | | 8,947 | | Low | 12-Aug-82 | 12,625 | | Low | 31-Jul-82 | 14,274 | | Low | 31-Jan-82 | 14,353 |
| Close | 31-Dec-82 | 16,957 | | 13,522 | | Close | 31-Dec-82 | 17,723 | | Close | 31-Dec-82 | 18,839 | | Close | 31-Dec-82 | 14,855 |
1983 | High | 10-Oct-83 | 21,599 | | 16,721 | | High | 10-Oct-83 | 22,491 | | High | 30-Nov-83 | 23,277 | | High | 30-Dec-83 | 15,419 |
| Low | 3-Jan-83 | 16,636 | | 13,266 | | Low | 3-Jan-83 | 17,433 | | Low | 31-Jan-83 | 19,378 | | Low | 31-Jan-83 | 14,886 |
| Close | 30-Dec-83 | 21,389 | | 16,424 | | Close | 30-Dec-83 | 21,721 | | Close | 30-Dec-83 | 23,127 | | Close | 30-Dec-83 | 15,419 |
1984 | High | 9-Jan-84 | 22,004 | | 16,896 | | High | 6-Nov-84 | 23,337 | | High | 31-Dec-84 | 24,119 | | High | 31-Oct-84 | 16,027 |
| Low | 24-Jul-84 | 18,549 | | 13,980 | | Low | 24-Jul-84 | 19,933 | | Low | 31-May-84 | 21,038 | | Low | 31-Jan-84 | 15,510 |
| Close | 31-Dec-84 | 22,621 | | 16,759 | | Close | 31-Dec-84 | 23,083 | | Close | 31-Dec-84 | 24,119 | | Close | 31-Dec-84 | 16,027 |
1985 | High | 16-Dec-85 | 29,736 | | 21,355 | | High | 16-Dec-85 | 30,417 | | High | 31-Dec-85 | 31,006 | | High | 31-Dec-85 | 16,636 |
| Low | 1-May-85 | 22,882 | | 16,819 | | Low | 4-Jan-85 | 22,592 | | Low | 31-Jan-85 | 25,851 | | Low | 31-Jan-85 | 16,058 |
| Close | 31-Dec-85 | 29,448 | | 21,148 | | Close | 31-Dec-85 | 30,407 | | Close | 31-Dec-85 | 31,006 | | Close | 31-Dec-85 | 16,636 |
1986 | High | 4-Sep-86 | 36,571 | | 25,757 | | High | 2-Dec-86 | 37,737 | | High | 31-Aug-86 | 37,352 | | High | 31-Dec-86 | 16,819 |
| Low | 14-Feb-86 | 31,766 | | 22,665 | | Low | 22-Jan-86 | 29,286 | | Low | 31-Jan-86 | 31,537 | | Low | 30-Apr-86 | 16,530 |
| Close | 31-Dec-86 | 35,941 | | 25,151 | | Close | 31-Dec-86 | 36,082 | | Close | 31-Dec-86 | 36,472 | | Close | 31-Dec-86 | 16,819 |
1987 | High | 25-Aug-87 | 50,132 | | 34,478 | | High | 25-Aug-87 | 51,060 | | High | 31-Aug-87 | 47,533 | | High | 30-Nov-87 | 17,565 |
| Low | 4-Dec-87 | 33,691 | | 23,002 | | Low | 4-Dec-87 | 34,314 | | Low | 30-Nov-87 | 35,112 | | Low | 31-Jan-87 | 16,925 |
| Close | 31-Dec-87 | 37,295 | | 25,463 | | Close | 31-Dec-87 | 37,977 | | Close | 31-Dec-87 | 37,434 | | Close | 31-Dec-87 | 17,565 |
1988 | High | 5-Jul-88 | 43,076 | | 28,988 | | High | 21-Oct-88 | 44,800 | | High | 30-Dec-88 | 44,304 | | High | 30-Dec-88 | 18,341 |
| Low | 20-Jan-88 | 36,464 | | 24,895 | | Low | 20-Jan-88 | 37,293 | | Low | 31-Jan-88 | 39,236 | | Low | 31-Jan-88 | 17,610 |
| Close | 30-Dec-88 | 43,246 | | 28,561 | | Close | 30-Dec-88 | 44,267 | | Close | 30-Dec-88 | 44,304 | | Close | 30-Dec-88 | 18,341 |
1989 | High | 9-Oct-89 | 58,786 | | 38,138 | | High | 9-Oct-89 | 58,837 | | High | 31-Aug-89 | 55,358 | | High | 29-Dec-89 | 19,193 |
| Low | 3-Jan-89 | 43,068 | | 28,443 | | Low | 3-Jan-89 | 43,883 | | Low | 28-Feb-89 | 46,392 | | Low | 31-Jan-89 | 18,432 |
| Close | 29-Dec-89 | 55,597 | | 35,438 | | Close | 29-Dec-89 | 58,269 | | Close | 29-Dec-89 | 54,819 | | Close | 29-Dec-89 | 19,193 |
1990 | High | 4-Jun-90 | 60,265 | | 37,947 | | High | 16-Jul-90 | 61,897 | | High | 31-May-90 | 55,785 | | High | 30-Nov-90 | 20,365 |
| Low | 11-Oct-90 | 46,988 | | 29,390 | | Low | 11-Oct-90 | 50,026 | | Low | 31-Oct-90 | 47,212 | | Low | 31-Jan-90 | 19,391 |
| Close | 31-Dec-90 | 52,130 | | 32,180 | | Close | 31-Dec-90 | 56,457 | | Close | 31-Dec-90 | 51,534 | | Close | 31-Dec-90 | 20,365 |
1991 | High | 31-Dec-91 | 67,947 | | 40,940 | | High | 31-Dec-91 | 73,620 | | High | 31-Dec-91 | 65,836 | | High | 31-Dec-91 | 20,989 |
| Low | 9-Jan-91 | 50,201 | | 30,989 | | Low | 9-Jan-91 | 53,255 | | Low | 31-Jan-91 | 54,196 | | Low | 31-Jan-91 | 20,487 |
| Close | 31-Dec-91 | 67,947 | | 40,940 | | Close | 31-Dec-91 | 73,620 | | Close | 31-Dec-91 | 65,836 | | Close | 31-Dec-91 | 20,989 |
1992 | High | 12-Nov-92 | 72,487 | | 42,938 | | High | 18-Dec-92 | 80,063 | | High | 31-Dec-92 | 72,177 | | High | 30-Nov-92 | 21,613 |
| Low | 8-Apr-92 | 66,472 | | 39,828 | | Low | 8-Apr-92 | 70,130 | | Low | 31-Jan-92 | 65,763 | | Low | 31-Jan-92 | 21,020 |
| Close | 31-Dec-92 | 74,871 | | 44,059 | | Close | 31-Dec-92 | 79,222 | | Close | 31-Dec-92 | 72,177 | | Close | 31-Dec-92 | 21,598 |
1993 | High | 2-Nov-93 | 88,379 | | 51,169 | | High | 28-Dec-93 | 87,854 | | High | 31-Dec-93 | 82,730 | | High | 30-Nov-93 | 22,192 |
| Low | 8-Jan-93 | 74,615 | | 43,908 | | Low | 8-Jan-93 | 78,011 | | Low | 31-Jan-93 | 73,298 | | Low | 31-Jan-93 | 21,705 |
| Close | 31-Dec-93 | 88,466 | | 50,884 | | Close | 31-Dec-93 | 87,189 | | Close | 31-Dec-93 | 82,730 | | Close | 31-Dec-93 | 22,192 |
1994 | High | 2-Feb-94 | 91,634 | | 52,706 | | High | 2-Feb-94 | 90,223 | | High | 31-Aug-94 | 85,813 | | High | 30-Nov-94 | 22,785 |
| Low | 8-Dec-94 | 86,773 | | 48,708 | | Low | 4-Apr-94 | 82,600 | | Low | 20-Apr-94 | 79,545 | | Low | 31-Jan-94 | 22,253 |
| Close | 30-Dec-94 | 89,641 | | 50,319 | | Close | 30-Dec-94 | 88,336 | | Close | 30-Dec-94 | 82,387 | | Close | 30-Dec-94 | 22,785 |
1995 | High | 29-Nov-95 | 119,498 | | 66,056 | | High | 13-Dec-95 | 122,408 | | High | 6-Dec-95 | 108,087 | | High | 31-Oct-95 | 23,394 |
| Low | 3-Jan-95 | 89,539 | | 50,261 | | Low | 3-Jan-95 | 88,305 | | Low | 3-Jan-95 | 82,387 | | Low | 31-Jan-95 | 22,877 |
| Close | 29-Dec-95 | 120,306 | | 66,210 | | Close | 29-Dec-95 | 121,491 | | Close | 29-Dec-95 | 108,042 | | Close | 29-Dec-95 | 23,364 |
1996 | High | 26-Nov-96 | 145,602 | | 79,119 | | High | 25-Nov-96 | 152,084 | | High | 27-Dec-96 | 131,831 | | High | 30-Nov-96 | 24,140 |
| Low | 10-Jan-96 | 117,715 | | 64,784 | | Low | 10-Jan-96 | 118,049 | | Low | 10-Jan-96 | 105,553 | | Low | 31-Jan-96 | 23,501 |
| Close | 31-Dec-96 | 144,352 | | 78,143 | | Close | 31-Dec-96 | 149,367 | | Close | 31-Dec-96 | 130,379 | | Close | 31-Dec-96 | 24,140 |
1997 | High | 7-Oct-97 | 189,427 | | 101,423 | | High | 5-Dec-97 | 201,641 | | High | 8-Oct-97 | 167,437 | | High | 31-Oct-97 | 24,597 |
| Low | 11-Apr-97 | 144,443 | | 77,891 | | Low | 2-Jan-97 | 148,615 | | Low | 2-Jan-97 | 129,511 | | Low | 31-Jan-97 | 24,216 |
| Close | 31-Dec-97 | 182,855 | | 97,513 | | Close | 31-Dec-97 | 199,183 | | Close | 31-Dec-97 | 165,420 | | Close | 31-Dec-97 | 24,551 |
1998 | High | 17-Jul-98 | 212,584 | | 112,606 | | High | 29-Dec-98 | 258,425 | | High | 17-Jul-98 | 190,194 | | High | 31-Oct-98 | 24,962 |
| Low | 8-Oct-98 | 173,534 | | 91,600 | | Low | 9-Jan-98 | 190,410 | | Low | 8-Oct-98 | 152,689 | | Low | 31-Jan-98 | 24,597 |
| Close | 31-Dec-98 | 213,421 | | 112,292 | | Close | 31-Dec-98 | 256,100 | | Close | 31-Dec-98 | 187,884 | | Close | 31-Dec-98 | 24,947 |
1999 | High | 10-Dec-99 | 258,554 | | 134,742 | | High | 31-Dec-99 | 309,980 | | High | 16-Jul-99 | 214,455 | | High | 30-Nov-99 | 25,616 |
| Low | 14-Jan-99 | 211,060 | | 111,050 | | Low | 14-Jan-99 | 252,550 | | Low | 17-Feb-99 | 183,318 | | Low | 31-Jan-99 | 25,008 |
| Close | 31-Dec-99 | 265,882 | | 138,151 | | Close | 31-Dec-99 | 309,980 | | Close | 31-Dec-99 | 210,168 | | Close | 31-Dec-99 | 25,616 |
2000 | High | 1-Sep-00 | 293,957 | | 151,363 | | High | 24-Mar-00 | 322,882 | | High | 1-Sep-00 | 221,351 | | High | 30-Nov-00 | 26,499 |
| Low | 21-Dec-00 | 266,380 | | 136,743 | | Low | 20-Dec-00 | 269,684 | | Low | 25-Feb-00 | 191,317 | | Low | 31-Jan-00 | 25,693 |
| Close | 29-Dec-00 | 277,235 | | 142,315 | | Close | 29-Dec-00 | 281,766 | | Close | 29-Dec-00 | 210,997 | | Close | 29-Dec-00 | 26,484 |
2001 | High | 1-Feb-01 | 287,822 | | 147,750 | | High | 30-Jan-01 | 293,173 | | High | 21-May-01 | 216,930 | | High | 30-Sep-01 | 27,139 |
| Low | 21-Sep-01 | 211,970 | | 107,718 | | Low | 21-Sep-01 | 207,919 | | Low | 21-Sep-01 | 166,373 | | Low | 31-Jan-01 | 26,651 |
| Close | 31-Dec-01 | 250,761 | | 126,959 | | Close | 31-Dec-01 | 248,303 | | Close | 31-Dec-01 | 195,336 | | Close | 31-Dec-01 | 26,895 |
2002 | High | 19-Mar-02 | 260,698 | | 131,491 | | High | 4-Jan-02 | 253,587 | | High | 19-Mar-02 | 201,690 | | High | 31-Oct-02 | 27,595 |
| Low | 9-Oct-02 | 182,355 | | 91,253 | | Low | 9-Oct-02 | 169,983 | | Low | 9-Oct-02 | 140,313 | | Low | 31-Jan-02 | 26,956 |
| Close | 31-Dec-02 | 207,271 | | 102,816 | | Close | 31-Dec-02 | 193,447 | | Close | 31-Dec-02 | 160,381 | | Close | 31-Dec-02 | 27,534 |
2003 | High | 31-Dec-03 | 273,523 | | 133,434 | | High | 31-Dec-03 | 248,903 | | High | 31-Dec-03 | 204,175 | | High | 30-Sep-03 | 28,189 |
| Low | 12-Mar-03 | 186,058 | | 91,854 | | Low | 11-Mar-03 | 176,642 | | Low | 11-Mar-03 | 145,989 | | Low | 31-Jan-03 | 27,656 |
| Close | 31-Dec-03 | 273,523 | | 133,434 | | Close | 31-Dec-03 | 248,903 | | Close | 31-Dec-03 | 204,175 | | Close | 31-Dec-03 | 28,052 |
2004 | High | 30-Dec-04 | 311,756 | | 149,252 | | High | 30-Dec-04 | 275,924 | | High | 30-Dec-04 | 228,446 | | High | 30-Nov-04 | 29,072 |
| Low | 17-May-04 | 264,555 | | 128,624 | | Low | 12-Aug-04 | 240,252 | | Low | 12-Aug-04 | 199,152 | | Low | 31-Jan-04 | 28,189 |
| Close | 31-Dec-04 | 311,563 | | 149,159 | | Close | 31-Dec-04 | 275,970 | | Close | 31-Dec-04 | 228,113 | | Close | 31-Dec-04 | 28,965 |
2005 | High | 14-Dec-05 | 352,458 | | 167,197 | | High | 14-Dec-05 | 294,796 | | High | 14-Dec-05 | 246,907 | | High | 31-Oct-05 | 30,320 |
| Low | 28-Apr-05 | 297,315 | | 141,898 | | Low | 20-Apr-05 | 260,187 | | Low | 20-Apr-05 | 218,372 | | Low | 31-Jan-05 | 29,026 |
| Close | 30-Dec-05 | 347,960 | | 163,728 | | Close | 30-Dec-05 | 289,511 | | Close | 30-Dec-05 | 243,681 | | Close | 30-Dec-05 | 29,954 |
2006 | High | 14-Dec-06 | 416,828 | | 194,392 | | High | 15-Dec-06 | 336,807 | | High | 15-Dec-06 | 283,196 | | High | 31-Aug-06 | 31,035 |
| Low | 13-Jun-06 | 354,244 | | 165,717 | | Low | 13-Jun-06 | 286,100 | | Low | 13-Jun-06 | 242,646 | | Low | 31-Jan-06 | 30,183 |
| Close | 29-Dec-06 | 414,904 | | 192,480 | | Close | 29-Dec-06 | 335,199 | | Close | 29-Dec-06 | 281,615 | | Close | 29-Dec-06 | 30,715 |
2007 | High | 31-Oct-07 | 490,222 | | 225,499 | | High | 9-Oct-07 | 374,990 | | High | 13-Jul-07 | 312,492 | | High | 30-Nov-07 | 31,990 |
| Low | 5-Mar-07 | 406,016 | | 187,812 | | Low | 5-Mar-07 | 325,873 | | Low | 5-Mar-07 | 275,075 | | Low | 31-Jan-07 | 30,809 |
| Close | 31-Dec-07 | 471,134 | | 213,905 | | Close | 31-Dec-07 | 353,601 | | Close | 31-Dec-07 | 293,656 | | Close | 31-Dec-07 | 31,969 |
| High | 19-May-08 | 477,753 | | 216,251 | | High | 2-Jan-08 | 348,496 | | High | 3-Jan-08 | 289,857 | | High | 31-Jul-08 | 33,480 |
2008 | Low | 20-Nov-08 | 236,224 | | 106,274 | | Low | 20-Nov-08 | 184,490 | | Low | 20-Nov-08 | 151,582 | | Low | 31-Dec-08 | 31,998 |
| Close | 31-Dec-08 | 284,112 | | 126,717 | | Close | 31-Dec-08 | 222,801 | | Close | 31-Dec-08 | 183,429 | | Close | 31-Dec-08 | 31,998 |
2009 | High | 28-Dec-09 | 382,823 | | 167,756 | | High | 28-Dec-09 | 284,556 | | High | 28-Dec-09 | 238,932 | | High | 30-Nov-09 | 32,927 |
| Low | 9-Mar-09 | 228,825 | | 101,506 | | Low | 9-Mar-09 | 167,859 | | Low | 9-Mar-09 | 139,956 | | Low | 31-Jan-09 | 32,137 |
| Close | 31-Dec-09 | 378,888 | | 166,031 | | Close | 31-Dec-09 | 281,781 | | Close | 31-Dec-09 | 236,804 | | Close | 31-Dec-09 | 32,869 |
2010 | High | 29-Dec-10 | 432,713 | | 186,423 | | High | 29-Dec-10 | 324,377 | | High | 29-Dec-10 | 270,610 | | High | 31-Dec-10 | 33,361 |
| Low | 2-Jul-10 | 348,630 | | 151,624 | | Low | 2-Jul-10 | 260,998 | | Low | 2-Jul-10 | 219,504 | | Low | 31-Jan-10 | 32,981 |
| Close | 31-Dec-10 | 432,124 | | 186,170 | | Close | 31-Dec-10 | 324,287 | | Close | 31-Dec-10 | 270,484 | | Close | 31-Dec-10 | 33,361 |
2011 | High | 29-Apr-11 | 474,328 | | 203,721 | | High | 29-Apr-11 | 353,633 | | High | 29-Apr-11 | 293,997 | | High | 30-Sep-11 | 34,534 |
| Low | 3-Oct-11 | 369,485 | | 157,610 | | Low | 3-Oct-11 | 287,688 | | Low | 3-Oct-11 | 234,480 | | Low | 31-Jan-11 | 33,519 |
| Close | 31-Dec-11 | 423,946 | | 179,524 | | Close | 31-Dec-11 | 331,054 | | Close | 31-Dec-11 | 265,561 | | Close | 31-Dec-11 | 34,349 |
[end mountain chart]
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31 | | | 1978 | 8 | | | 1979 | | | | 1980 | | | | 1981 | | | | 1982 | | | | 1983 | | | | 1984 | | | | 1985 | |
Capital value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends in cash | | $ | 216 | | | | 405 | | | | 553 | | | | 580 | | | | 634 | | | | 594 | | | | 556 | | | | 582 | |
Value at year-end1 | | $ | 8,947 | | | | 9,892 | | | | 11,390 | | | | 10,688 | | | | 13,522 | | | | 16,424 | | | | 16,759 | | | | 21,148 | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends reinvested | | $ | 217 | | | | 421 | | | | 603 | | | | 665 | | | | 768 | | | | 755 | | | | 734 | | | | 795 | |
Value at year-end1 | | $ | 9,155 | | | | 10,556 | | | | 12,807 | | | | 12,654 | | | | 16,957 | | | | 21,389 | | | | 22,621 | | | | 29,448 | |
Total return | | | (8.4 | )% | | | 15.3 | | | | 21.3 | | | | (1.2 | ) | | | 34.0 | | | | 26.1 | | | | 5.8 | | | | 30.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31 | | | 1986 | | | | 1987 | | | | 1988 | | | | 1989 | | | | 1990 | | | | 1991 | | | | 1992 | | | | 1993 | |
Capital value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends in cash | | | 636 | | | | 717 | | | | 895 | | | | 1,225 | | | | 1,058 | | | | 904 | | | | 988 | | | | 1,084 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 25,151 | | | | 25,463 | | | | 28,561 | | | | 35,438 | | | | 32,180 | | | | 40,940 | | | | 44,059 | | | | 50,884 | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | 894 | | | | 1,034 | | | | 1,328 | | | | 1,877 | | | | 1,679 | | | | 1,478 | | | | 1,655 | | | | 1,858 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 35,941 | | | | 37,295 | | | | 43,246 | | | | 55,597 | | | | 52,130 | | | | 67,947 | | | | 74,871 | | | | 88,466 | |
Total return | | | 22.0 | | | | 3.8 | | | | 16.0 | | | | 28.6 | | | | (6.2 | ) | | | 30.3 | | | | 10.2 | | | | 18.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31 | | | 1994 | | | | 1995 | | | | 1996 | | | | 1997 | | | | 1998 | | | | 1999 | | | | 2000 | | | | 2001 | |
Capital value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends in cash | | | 1,238 | | | | 1,160 | | | | 1,196 | | | | 1,351 | | | | 1,428 | | | | 1,578 | | | | 1,716 | | | | 1,844 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 50,319 | | | | 66,210 | | | | 78,143 | | | | 97,513 | | | | 112,292 | | | | 138,151 | | | | 142,315 | | | | 126,959 | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | 2,171 | | | | 2,082 | | | | 2,187 | | | | 2,511 | | | | 2,691 | | | | 3,013 | | | | 3,319 | | | | 3,611 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 89,641 | | | | 120,306 | | | | 144,352 | | | | 182,855 | | | | 213,421 | | | | 265,882 | | | | 277,235 | | | | 250,761 | |
Total return | | | 1.3 | | | | 34.2 | | | | 20.0 | | | | 26.7 | | | | 16.7 | | | | 24.6 | | | | 4.3 | | | | (9.6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31 | | | 2002 | | | | 2003 | | | | 2004 | | | | 2005 | | | | 2006 | | | | 2007 | | | | 2008 | | | | 2009 | |
Capital value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends in cash | | | 2,289 | | | | 1,850 | | | | 2,590 | | | | 2,729 | | | | 2,590 | | | | 4,572 | | | | 2,938 | | | | 2,435 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 102,816 | | | | 133,434 | | | | 149,159 | | | | 163,728 | | | | 192,480 | | | | 213,905 | | | | 126,717 | | | | 166,031 | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | 4,553 | | | | 3,755 | | | | 5,345 | | | | 5,735 | | | | 5,534 | | | | 9,917 | | | | 6,506 | | | | 5,500 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 207,271 | | | | 273,523 | | | | 311,563 | | | | 347,960 | | | | 414,904 | | | | 471,134 | | | | 284,112 | | | | 378,888 | |
Total return | | | (17.3 | ) | | | 32.0 | | | | 13.9 | | | | 11.7 | | | | 19.2 | | | | 13.6 | | | | (39.7 | ) | | | 33.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31 | | | 2010 | | | | 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends in cash | | | 2,891 | | | | 3,120 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 186,170 | | | | 179,524 | 6 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | 6,641 | | | | 7,284 | | | Average annual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 432,124 | | | | 423,946 | 3 | | total return | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return | | | 14.0 | | | | (1.9 | ) | | | 11.9 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1As outlined in the prospectus, the sales charge is reduced for accounts (and aggregated investments) of $25,000 or more and is eliminated for purchases of $1 million or more. |
| 2The maximum initial sales charge was 8.50% prior to July 1, 1988. |
| 3Includes reinvested dividends of $99,118 and reinvested capital gains of $170,881. |
| 4The S&P 500 Index is unmanaged and, therefore, has no expenses. |
| 5Results of the Lipper Growth and Income Funds Index do not reflect any sales charges. |
| 6Includes reinvested capital gain distributions of $91,556 but does not reflect income dividends of $51,143 taken in cash. |
| 7Computed from data supplied by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. |
| 8For the period August 1, 1978 (when Capital Research and Management Company became investment adviser) through December 31, 1978. |
The results shown are before taxes on fund distributions and sale of fund shares.
Opportunity up close:
A look at some of Fundamental Investors’ holdings offers room for optimism
[photo of a person holding binoculars standing in a field]
On the heels of a year in which headlines and economic indicators offered a running reminder of the challenges facing the global economy, investors might wonder if investing opportunities exist in an environment seemingly rife with uncertainty.
The good news is, they do, but spotting them often requires a shift in focus — away from the broader macroeconomic backdrop and onto individual companies. Studying them closely often reveals possibilities and potential that those fixated on uncertainty might overlook.
Uncovering opportunity at the company level has always been at the center of Fundamental Investors’ approach regardless of market conditions. And in the following pages, the men and women who manage the fund highlight a number of holdings they believe have the potential to fare well in the coming years even if some of the current headwinds continue to blow.
Home improvement retailing?
Given that excesses in the housing market helped precipitate the current global economic downturn, one might not expect to find opportunity in a company closely linked to the housing sector. However, Home Depot, one of the fund’s largest holdings, offers a lesson in how the fortunes of a company can diverge from those of the economy, the market and its industry group.
“Many businesses and industries with links to the housing market suffered when the real estate market collapsed,” explains portfolio counselor Mike Kerr. “Naturally, home improvement retailers were one such area. Yet in the face of the downturn, Home Depot has been improving, continuing the turnaround set in motion several years ago by a new management team.”
Better logistics and supply-chain management, a renewed commitment to customer service and improved merchandising have enabled the company to become more profitable even as sales have remained relatively flat.
Several years ago, investment analyst Anne-Marie Peterson, a 15-year veteran of the retailing sector, started picking up signs that the retailer was on the mend and began building an investment case in early 2009. Regular meetings with company management fostered her conviction in the firm. “Each year I traveled to Home Depot’s headquarters in Atlanta to meet with senior managers, and each year I asked the same questions. The answers I got were consistent, as was the company’s ability to reach the goals and milestones they had articulated the year before.”
[Begin Sidebar]
Uncovering opportunity at the company level has always been at the center of Fundamental Investors’ approach regardless of market conditions.
[End Sidebar]
[photo of a flower in the middle of a patch of grass]
Despite a difficult backdrop, Home Depot shares were up sharply in 2011. And Anne-Marie and Mike both believe that should the housing market stabilize and home-improvement spending begin to climb, the company has the potential to benefit. In the meantime, it continues to return cash to shareholders thanks to its dividend yield of nearly 3%.
Must-have products
When downturns hit, consumer spending patterns change. Facing stagnant wages and concerns over job security, people often pare discretionary spending; industries offering “nice-to-have” products can suffer. Conversely, companies that provide essential products or services can hold up relatively well. One such example is Gilead Pharmaceuticals, in which portfolio counselor Ron Morrow maintains an investment.
“Gilead helped transform the treatment of HIV. Thanks in part to the firm’s technology, medication regimens that once required patients to take multiple pills and do so at different times throughout the day, now often involve a single daily pill,” explains Ron. “Though of course HIV remains a huge global problem, for many it’s become a chronic disease rather than a fatal one.”
Ron’s investment is also about the company’s efforts relating to another growing health problem: hepatitis C. Current hepatitis C treatments are lengthy, have numerous side effects and offer limited cure rates. For those in the worst condition, transplants are sometimes the only way to prolong life.
Gilead believes its recent acquisition of Pharmasset can help it revolutionize the treatment of a disease that affects more than 170 million worldwide.
Ron’s evaluation of the company benefits from the input of biotechnology analyst Jay Markowitz, whose experience with HIV and hepatitis C dates back to his medical training and previous career as a transplant surgeon. “I saw how Gilead revolutionized HIV treatment, and thanks in part to the acquisition of Pharmasset’s medicines, I believe it has the potential to make similar progress against hepatitis C, the leading cause of end-stage liver disease and liver cancer.”
Ron and Jay both believe that the kind of advances that Gilead is hoping for have the potential to benefit investors regardless of the market backdrop. In Jay’s words, “I’ve found that drug companies with transformative therapies generally have offered returns regardless of what the broader market is doing.”
[Begin Sidebar]
Many eggs, many baskets
The five companies highlighted here are part of Fundamental Investors’ broadly diversified portfolio of over 200 holdings. Drawn from multiple industries and consisting of firms from over 15 countries, the portfolio cuts a broad swath across the global economy. Yet the fund’s diversification is not the result of top-down planning but rather is an organic byproduct of an investment method developed over 50 years ago with the goal of incorporating multiple investing perspectives into a single portfolio.
Known as the Multiple Portfolio Counselor System® (MPCS), this approach divides fund assets into portions, each of which is independently managed — according to fund objectives — by one of Fundamental Investors’ six portfolio counselors. A seventh portion is managed by the fund’s investment analysts. Unlike a committee system that requires consensus, the MPCS accommodates the differing perspectives of the individual counselors, allowing each to invest according to his or her experience, background and preferences. Counselors with a penchant for low-valuation, out-of-favor companies may choose to focus on those while a colleague interested in higher valuation, growth-oriented firms can emphasize them.
And, importantly, given how uncertainty in the current environment creates the potential for a wide range of outcomes, counselors can also make decisions based on their individual outlooks on the economy and markets. For example, a counselor with a more optimistic perspective may favor companies that stand to benefit from an improving economy, while a colleague with a less sanguine view may prefer more defensive investments.
A portfolio that reflects the varied and often divergent worldviews of multiple individuals offers the potential to mitigate some of the hazards that can come with a portfolio built according to a single perspective that requires a specific market or economic outcome to be successful.
[End Sidebar]
Boosting possibilities
Hear the word “turbocharger” and thoughts may turn to luxury car manufacturers looking to boost performance in high-end vehicles. But turbochargers can play an important role in generating more horsepower from less gasoline, enabling automakers to better meet the increasingly stringent fuel economy standards being imposed by governments. Demand for turbochargers is projected to grow 20% annually over the next five years, and this trend is partly behind portfolio counselor Brady Enright’s investment in a company familiar to many, Honeywell International.
“To many people Honeywell may best be known as a company involved in the technology and aerospace areas, but it has a significant automotive business and is a worldwide leader in turbocharger production,” says Brady. “Honeywell combines several attributes that I like to see in companies in which I invest, including a leading position in growth markets, a strong balance sheet and excellent cash generation.”
And while some might see Honeywell as the kind of industrial conglomerate whose well-being is dependent on a robust global economy, industrials analyst Martin Jacobs offers a different point of view. “I believe Honeywell is less dependent on economic expansion to meet its long-term growth and profit goals than some of its competitors. And the automotive business is just one of the reasons for this.”
In particular he cites the integrated energy services, and automation and controls division. Together these businesses seek to help owners of buildings such as hospitals, schools and hotels reduce what is often their biggest operational cost: energy. Honeywell also has a commercial aerospace division that produces equipment used in aviation, another potential growth area as more jetliners come on line to serve the world’s increasingly mobile population.
As costs change, so does outlook
Dow Chemical might not seem like the most obvious candidate to prosper amid difficult market conditions. After all, materials producers are among the most economically sensitive companies, and it’s often assumed that they can only prosper when the broader economy does. Yet portfolio counselor Martin Romo, who covered Dow for nearly a dozen years as an analyst, sees considerable room for optimism thanks in large part to what laymen might regard as an unrelated development: advances in the field of natural gas exploration.
“Dow’s principal business is producing plastics, and natural gas is the primary ingredient in its products,” he explains. “As a result, the company’s profitability is strongly linked to natural gas prices. In recent years, advances in the techniques used to extract natural gas have radically improved the long-term supply picture. This is particularly true in the United States where Dow has most of its manufacturing. It completely alters the company’s cost structure and gives it a competitive advantage it hasn’t enjoyed in nearly 20 years.”
The company has also improved its balance sheet and begun working to restore the dividend it slashed after nearly entering bankruptcy in 2009. And though the stock declined in price last year, Martin Romo’s belief in the company as a solid long-term investment has not diminished.
[photo of a butterfly on a blade of grass]
[Begin Sidebar]
While the stock market is busy worrying about a company’s next quarter, Fundamental Investors’ investment professionals are trying to figure out what returns over the next several years could be.
[End Sidebar]
It’s a position shared by his colleague, chemicals analyst Peter Eliot, who takes care to point out how the fund’s long-term approach to investing helps him look beyond the immediate challenges. “Funds with a short-term orientation generally won’t hold a stock if the three-month outlook is cloudy — there’s simply too much risk. Yet ironically, low stock prices resulting from uncertainty often create long-term investing opportunities. Dow is benefiting from a tectonic shift in the global cost curve for plastics. Cheap U.S. natural gas has dramatically enhanced the company’s competitive position. So while the stock market is busy worrying about Dow’s next quarter, we are trying to figure out what returns over the next several years could be.”
We are hearing them now
For Dina Perry, one of Fundamental Investors’ portfolio counselors as well as its president, Verizon Communications is the kind of investment that can help the fund deliver on its twofold objective: long-term growth of capital and income.
“I view Verizon as a utility with growth potential,” states Dina. “The growth potential stems from its status as the country’s premier wireless provider that, thanks to excellent assets and execution, continues to take market share. And the company fits the profile of a utility in one key respect — its dividend.”
Indeed with a dividend yield of more than 5.0%, Verizon has the potential to provide significant tangible return for the foreseeable future — reassuring given the challenges facing the global economy. And while the dividend is a big part of the company’s appeal, Dina and telecommunications analyst Andrei Muresianu point to several initiatives and competitive advantages that add to their belief that the share price can appreciate as well. “In recent years, Verizon’s initiatives on a number of fronts have steadily reshaped it into a growth company,” says Andrei. “The engine of that growth has been in the wireless area where Verizon is regarded as having the best network.”
That network will be increasingly important — and potentially lucrative — in the coming years as more consumers convert to smartphones that require robust capacity to transmit the large amounts of data these devices draw. With this goal in mind, the company recently purchased considerable spectrum to help increase its capacity.
And though the boom in cellular phone use has triggered a decline in landline customers, Verizon has taken advantage of its existing home phone infrastructure to deploy its increasingly successful FiOS cable and Internet service.
“With dividend support and an appealing portfolio of growing businesses, I believe Verizon is the kind of company that has the potential to do well in almost any market,” explains Dina. “We’ve thoroughly researched it, gotten to know its managers and worked to ascertain its risk-reward profile. This holds true for all the fund’s holdings, and it’s our unwavering commitment to this approach that gives me confidence as we seek to navigate the challenges ahead.” n
American Funds Fundamental Investors (the "trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end, diversified management investment company and has initially issued one series of shares, Fundamental Investors (the "fund"). The fund seeks long-term growth of capital and income.
The fund has 16 share classes consisting of five retail share classes, five 529 college savings plan share classes and six retirement plan share classes. The 529 college savings plan share classes (529-A, 529-B, 529-C, 529-E and 529-F-1) can be used to save for college education. The six retirement plan share classes (R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5 and R-6) are generally offered only through eligible employer-sponsored retirement plans. The fund’s share classes are described below:
Share class | Initial sales charge | Contingent deferred sales charge upon redemption | Conversion feature |
Classes A and 529-A | Up to 5.75% | None (except 1% for certain redemptions within one year of purchase without an initial sales charge) | None |
Classes B and 529-B* | None | Declines from 5% to 0% for redemptions within six years of purchase | Classes B and 529-B convert to Classes A and 529-A, respectively, after eight years |
Class C | None | 1% for redemptions within one year of purchase | Class C converts to Class F-1 after 10 years |
Class 529-C | None | 1% for redemptions within one year of purchase | None |
Class 529-E | None | None | None |
Classes F-1, F-2 and 529-F-1 | None | None | None |
Classes R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5 and R-6 | None | None | None |
*Class B and 529-B shares of the fund are not available for purchase.
Holders of all share classes have equal pro rata rights to assets, dividends and liquidation proceeds. Each share class has identical voting rights, except for the exclusive right to vote on matters affecting only its class. Share classes have different fees and expenses ("class-specific fees and expenses"), primarily due to different arrangements for distribution, administrative and shareholder services. Differences in class-specific fees and expenses will result in differences in net investment income and, therefore, the payment of different per-share dividends by each class.
2. | Significant accounting policies |
The financial statements have been prepared to comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The fund follows the significant accounting policies described on the following page, as well as the valuation policies described in the next section on valuation.
Security transactions and related investment income – Security transactions are recorded by the fund as of the date the trades are executed with brokers. Realized gains and losses from security transactions are determined based on the specific identified cost of the securities. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. Market discounts, premiums and original issue discounts on fixed-income securities are amortized daily over the expected life of the security.
Class allocations – Income, fees and expenses (other than class-specific fees and expenses) and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily among the various share classes based on their relative net assets. Class-specific fees and expenses, such as distribution, administrative and shareholder services, are charged directly to the respective share class.
Dividends and distributions to shareholders – Dividends and distributions paid to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Currency translation – Assets and liabilities, including investment securities, denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the valuation date. Purchases and sales of investment securities and income and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates on the dates of such transactions. On the accompanying financial statements, the effects of changes in exchange rates on investment securities are included with the net realized gain or loss and net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments. The realized gain or loss and unrealized appreciation or depreciation resulting from all other transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are disclosed separately.
The fund’s investments are reported at fair value as defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The fund generally determines the net asset value of each share class as of approximately 4:00 p.m. New York time each day the New York Stock Exchange is open.
Methods and inputs – The fund uses the following methods and inputs to establish the fair value of its assets and liabilities. Use of particular methods and inputs may vary over time based on availability and relevance as market and economic conditions evolve.
Equity securities are generally valued at the official closing price of, or the last reported sale price on, the exchange or market on which such securities are traded, as of the close of business on the day the securities are being valued or, lacking any sales, at the last available bid price. Prices for each security are taken from the principal exchange or market on which the security trades.
Fixed-income securities, including short-term securities purchased with more than 60 days left to maturity, are generally valued at prices obtained from one or more pricing vendors. Vendors value such securities based on one or more of the inputs described in the following table. The table provides examples of inputs that are commonly relevant for valuing particular classes of fixed-income securities in which the fund is authorized to invest. However, these classifications are not exclusive, and any of the inputs may be used to value any other class of fixed-income security.
Fixed-income class | Examples of standard inputs |
All | Benchmark yields, transactions, bids, offers, quotations from dealers and trading systems, new issues, spreads and other relationships observed in the markets among comparable securities; and proprietary pricing models such as yield measures calculated using factors such as cash flows, financial or collateral performance and other reference data (collectively referred to as “standard inputs”) |
Corporate bonds & notes; convertible securities | Standard inputs and underlying equity of the issuer |
Bonds & notes of governments & government agencies | Standard inputs and interest rate volatilities |
Mortgage-backed; asset-backed obligations | Standard inputs and cash flows, prepayment information, default rates, delinquency and loss assumptions, collateral characteristics, credit enhancements and specific deal information |
Where the investment adviser deems it appropriate to do so (such as when vendor prices are unavailable or not deemed to be representative), fixed-income securities will be valued in good faith at the mean quoted bid and asked prices that are reasonably and timely available (or bid prices, if asked prices are not available) or at prices for securities of comparable maturity, quality and type.
Securities with both fixed-income and equity characteristics, or equity securities traded principally among fixed-income dealers, are generally valued in the manner described above for either equity or fixed-income securities, depending on which method is deemed most appropriate by the investment adviser. Short-term securities purchased within 60 days to maturity are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. The value of short-term securities originally purchased with maturities greater than 60 days is determined based on an amortized value to par when they reach 60 days.
Securities and other assets for which representative market quotations are not readily available or are considered unreliable by the investment adviser are fair valued as determined in good faith under guidelines adopted by authority of the fund's board of trustees. Market quotations may be considered unreliable if events occur that materially affect the value of securities (particularly equity securities trading outside the U.S.) between the close of trading in those securities and the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Various inputs may be reviewed in order to make a good faith determination of a security’s fair value. These inputs include, but are not limited to, the type and cost of the security; contractual or legal restrictions on resale of the security; relevant financial or business developments of the issuer; actively traded similar or related securities; conversion or exchange rights on the security; related corporate actions; significant events occurring after the close of trading in the security; and changes in overall market conditions. Fair valuations and valuations of investments that are not actively trading involve judgment and may differ materially from valuations that would have been used had greater market activity occurred.
Classifications – The fund classifies its assets and liabilities into three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities. Level 1 values are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 values are based on significant observable market inputs, such as quoted prices for similar securities and quoted prices in inactive markets. Certain securities trading outside the U.S. may transfer between Level 1 and Level 2 due to valuation adjustments resulting from significant market movements following the close of local trading. Level 3 values are based on significant unobservable inputs that reflect the fund’s determination of assumptions that market participants might reasonably use in valuing the securities. The valuation levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with the underlying investment. For example, U.S. government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market. The following table presents the fund’s valuation levels as of December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
Investment securities: | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Common stocks: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Information technology | | $ | 6,665,651 | | | $ | 447,730 | * | | $ | - | | | $ | 7,113,381 | |
Energy | | | 5,973,651 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 5,973,651 | |
Industrials | | | 5,835,185 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 5,835,185 | |
Consumer discretionary | | | 5,581,078 | | | | 79,751 | * | | | - | | | | 5,660,829 | |
Health care | | | 4,974,464 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,974,464 | |
Financials | | | 4,271,891 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,271,891 | |
Materials | | | 3,613,453 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,613,453 | |
Consumer staples | | | 3,147,730 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,147,730 | |
Telecommunication services | | | 1,688,248 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,688,248 | |
Utilities | | | 1,281,908 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,281,908 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 737,372 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 737,372 | |
Convertible securities | | | - | | | | 14,960 | | | | - | | | | 14,960 | |
Bonds & notes | | | | | | | 4,898 | | | | - | | | | 4,898 | |
Short-term securities | | | - | | | | 2,585,051 | | | | - | | | | 2,585,051 | |
Total | | $ | 43,770,631 | | | $ | 3,132,390 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 46,903,021 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(*) Includes certain securities trading outside the U.S. whose values were adjusted as a result of significant market movements following the close of local trading; therefore, $527,481,000 of investment securities were classified as Level 2 instead of Level 1. |
Investing in the fund may involve certain risks including, but not limited to, those described below.
Market conditions — The prices of, and the income generated by, the common stocks and other securities held by the fund may decline due to market conditions and other factors, including those directly involving the issuers of securities held by the fund.
Investing in growth-oriented stocks — Growth-oriented stocks may involve larger price swings and greater potential for loss than other types of investments.
Investing in income-oriented stocks — Income provided by the fund may be reduced by changes in the dividend policies of, and the capital resources available at, the companies in which the fund invests.
Investing outside the U.S. — Securities of issuers domiciled outside the U.S., or with significant operations outside the U.S., may lose value because of political, social, economic or market developments or instability in the countries or regions in which the issuer operates. These securities may also lose value due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar and/or currencies of other countries. Securities markets in certain countries may be more volatile and/or less liquid than those in the U.S. Investments outside the U.S. may also be subject to different settlement and accounting practices and different regulatory, legal and reporting standards, and may be more difficult to value, than those in the U.S. The risks of investing outside the .S. may be heightened in connection with investments in emerging and developing countries.
Management — The investment adviser to the fund actively manages the fund’s investments. Consequently, the fund is subject to the risk that the methods and analyses employed by the investment adviser in this process may not produce the desired results. This could cause the fund to lose value or its investment results to lag relevant benchmarks or other funds with similar objectives.
5. | Taxation and distributions |
Federal income taxation – The fund complies with the requirements under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to mutual funds and intends to distribute substantially all of its net taxable income and net capital gains each year. The fund is not subject to income taxes to the extent such distributions are made. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required.
As of and during the period ended December 31, 2011, the fund did not have a liability for any unrecognized tax benefits. The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the statement of operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
The fund is not subject to examination by U.S. federal tax authorities for tax years before 2008, by state tax authorities for tax years before 2007 and by tax authorities outside the U.S. for tax years before 2005.
Non-U.S. taxation – Dividend income is recorded net of non-U.S. taxes paid. Gains realized by the fund on the sale of securities in certain countries are subject to non-U.S. taxes. The fund records a liability based on unrealized gains to provide for potential non-U.S. taxes payable upon the sale of these securities.
Distributions – Distributions paid to shareholders are based on net investment income and net realized gains determined on a tax basis, which may differ from net investment income and net realized gains for financial reporting purposes. These differences are due primarily to different treatment for items such as currency gains and losses; short-term capital gains and losses; capital losses related to sales of certain securities within 30 days of purchase; deferred expenses; and net capital losses. The fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the year in which the net investment income and net realized gains are recorded by the fund for financial reporting purposes.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the fund reclassified $694,000 from undistributed net investment income to accumulated net realized loss and $214,000 from undistributed net investment income to capital paid in on shares of beneficial interest to align financial reporting with tax reporting.
Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”), net capital losses recognized after December 31, 2010, may be carried forward indefinitely, and their character is retained as short-term and/or long-term losses. Previously, net capital losses were carried forward for eight years and treated as short-term losses. As a transition rule, the Act requires that post-enactment net capital losses be used before pre-enactment net capital losses.
As of December 31, 2011, the tax basis components of distributable earnings, unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and cost of investment securities were as follows:
| | (dollars in thousands) | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | | | $ | 213,030 | | |
Capital loss carryforward*: | | | | | | | |
Expiring 2016 | | $ | (689,800 | ) | | | | |
Expiring 2017 | | | (3,190,744 | ) | | (3,880,544 | ) | |
Post-October capital loss deferral† | | | | | | (37,363 | ) | |
Gross unrealized appreciation on investment securities | | | | | | 10,185,560 | |
Gross unrealized depreciation on investment securities | | | | | | (2,772,282 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investment securities | | | | | | 7,413,278 | |
Cost of investment securities | | | | | | 39,489,743 | |
| | |
*Reflects the utilization of capital loss carryforward of $823,129,000. The capital loss carryforward will be used to offset any capital gains realized by the fund in future years through the expiration dates. The fund will not make distributions from capital gains while a capital loss carryforward remains. |
†This deferral is considered incurred in the subsequent year. | | | | | | | | |
Tax-basis distributions paid to shareholders from ordinary income were as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | Year ended December 31 | |
Share class | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Class A | | $ | 536,252 | | | $ | 522,129 | |
Class B | | | 5,513 | | | | 6,978 | |
Class C | | | 16,898 | | | | 17,623 | |
Class F-1 | | | 74,047 | | | | 66,841 | |
Class F-2 | | | 17,995 | | | | 14,478 | |
Class 529-A | | | 15,775 | | | | 13,222 | |
Class 529-B | | | 420 | | | | 531 | |
Class 529-C | | | 2,269 | | | | 2,047 | |
Class 529-E | | | 577 | | | | 485 | |
Class 529-F-1 | | | 733 | | | | 595 | |
Class R-1 | | | 1,316 | | | | 1,147 | |
Class R-2 | | | 5,655 | | | | 5,371 | |
Class R-3 | | | 30,098 | | | | 26,995 | |
Class R-4 | | | 36,531 | | | | 29,941 | |
Class R-5 | | | 27,595 | | | | 26,478 | |
Class R-6 | | | 26,189 | | | | 15,526 | |
Total | | $ | 797,863 | | | $ | 750,387 | |
6. | Fees and transactions with related parties |
Capital Research and Management Company ("CRMC"), the fund’s investment adviser, is the parent company of American Funds Distributors,® Inc. ("AFD"), the principal underwriter of the fund’s shares, and American Funds Service Company® ("AFS"), the fund’s transfer agent.
Investment advisory services – The fund has an investment advisory and service agreement with CRMC that provides for monthly fees accrued daily. These fees are based on a series of decreasing annual rates beginning with 0.390% on the first $1 billion of daily net assets and decreasing to 0.232% on such assets in excess of $55 billion. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the investment advisory services fee was $125,668,000, which was equivalent to an annualized rate of 0.252% of average daily net assets.
Class-specific fees and expenses – Expenses that are specific to individual share classes are accrued directly to the respective share class. The principal class-specific fees and expenses are described below:
Distribution services – The fund has plans of distribution for all share classes, except Classes F-2, R-5 and R-6. Under the plans, the board of trustees approves certain categories of expenses that are used to finance activities primarily intended to sell fund shares and service existing accounts. The plans provide for payments, based on an annualized percentage of average daily net assets, ranging from 0.25% to 1.00% as noted below. In some cases, the board of trustees has limited the amounts that may be paid to less than the maximum allowed by the plans. All share classes with a plan may use up to 0.25% of average daily net assets to pay service fees, or to compensate AFD for paying service fees, to firms that have entered into agreements with AFD to provide certain shareholder services. The remaining amounts available to be paid under each plan are paid to dealers to compensate them for their sales activities.
For Classes A and 529-A, distribution-related expenses include the reimbursement of dealer and wholesaler commissions paid by AFD for certain shares sold without a sales charge. These classes reimburse AFD for amounts billed within the prior 15 months but only to the extent that the overall annual expense limit of 0.25% is not exceeded. As of December 31, 2011, there were no unreimbursed expenses subject to reimbursement for Class A.
Share class | Currently approved limits | Plan limits |
Class A | 0.25% | 0.25% |
Class 529-A | 0.25 | 0.50 |
Classes B and 529-B | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Classes C, 529-C and R-1 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Class R-2 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
Classes 529-E and R-3 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
Classes F-1, 529-F-1 and R-4 | 0.25 | 0.50 |
Transfer agent services – The fund has a transfer agent agreement with AFS for Classes A and B. Under this agreement, these share classes compensate AFS for transfer agent services including shareholder recordkeeping, communications and transaction processing. AFS is also compensated for certain transfer agent services provided to all other share classes from the administrative services fees paid to CRMC as described in the administrative services paragraph below.
On December 1, 2011, the board of trustees approved an amended shareholder services agreement with AFS effective January 1, 2012. The amended agreement covers the transfer agent services described above and is applicable to all share classes. AFS may use these fees to compensate third parties for performing these services. Beginning January 1, 2012, transfer agent services previously provided to share classes other than Classes A and B will no longer be paid to CRMC, and passed through to AFS and other third parties, through the administrative services agreement described in the administrative services paragraph below.
Administrative services – The fund has an administrative services agreement with CRMC for all share classes, except Classes A and B, to provide administrative services that include, but are not limited to, coordinating, monitoring, assisting and overseeing third parties that provide services to fund shareholders. The current agreement also provides for certain transfer agent and recordkeeping services. Each relevant share class pays CRMC annual fees up to 0.15% (0.10% for Class R-5 and 0.05% for Class R-6) based on its respective average daily net assets. Each relevant share class also pays AFS additional amounts for certain transfer agent services. CRMC and AFS may use these fees to compensate third parties for performing these services.
On December 1, 2011, the board of trustees approved an amended administrative services agreement with CRMC effective January 1, 2012. The amended agreement covers the administrative services described on the previous page and calls for each share class, except Class B, to pay CRMC annual fees of 0.05% (0.01% for Class A) based on its respective average daily net assets to compensate CRMC for administrative services. Transfer agent and recordkeeping services previously provided to share classes other than Classes A and B will no longer be paid to CRMC, and passed through to AFS and other third parties, through the administrative services agreement. Beginning January 1, 2012, transfer agent and recordkeeping services for all share classes will be paid to AFS through the shareholder services agreement described in the transfer agent services section on the previous page.
Each 529 share class is subject to an additional administrative services fee payable to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the maintenance of the 529 college savings plan. The quarterly fee is based on a series of decreasing annual rates beginning with 0.10% on the first $30 billion of the net assets invested in Class 529 shares of the American Funds and decreasing to 0.06% on such assets between $120 billion and $150 billion. The fee for any given calendar quarter is accrued and calculated on the basis of the average net assets of Class 529 shares of the American Funds for the last month of the prior calendar quarter. Although these amounts are included with administrative services fees on the accompanying financial statements, the Commonwealth of Virginia is not considered a related party.
Expenses under the agreements described above for the year ended December 31, 2011, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | Administrative services | |
Share class | | Distribution services | | | Transfer agent services | | | CRMC administrative services | | | Transfer agent services | | | Commonwealth of Virginia administrative services | |
Class A | | $ | 76,050 | | | $ | 42,977 | | | Not applicable | | | Not applicable | | | Not applicable | |
Class B | | | 6,539 | | | | 859 | | | Not applicable | | | Not applicable | | | Not applicable | |
Class C | | | 20,087 | | | Included in administrative services | | | $ | 3,015 | | | $ | 444 | | | Not applicable | |
Class F-1 | | | 11,170 | | | | | | | | 6,609 | | | | 276 | | | Not applicable | |
Class F-2 | | Not applicable | | | | | 1,397 | | | | 38 | | | Not applicable | |
Class 529-A | | | 2,041 | | | | | | | | 1,125 | | | | 166 | | | $ | 969 | |
Class 529-B | | | 568 | | | | | | | | 65 | | | | 19 | | | | 57 | |
Class 529-C | | | 2,760 | | | | | | | | 320 | | | | 75 | | | | 276 | |
Class 529-E | | | 214 | | | | | | | | 41 | | | | 7 | | | | 43 | |
Class 529-F-1 | | | - | | | | | | | | 46 | | | | 7 | | | | 40 | |
Class R-1 | | | 1,460 | | | | | | | | 209 | | | | 29 | | | Not applicable | |
Class R-2 | | | 4,725 | | | | | | | | 932 | | | | 1,567 | | | Not applicable | |
Class R-3 | | | 11,149 | | | | | | | | 3,311 | | | | 1,096 | | | Not applicable | |
Class R-4 | | | 5,525 | | | | | | | | 3,300 | | | | 49 | | | Not applicable | |
Class R-5 | | Not applicable | | | | | 1,418 | | | | 16 | | | Not applicable | |
Class R-6 | | Not applicable | | | | | 619 | | | | 8 | | | Not applicable | |
Total | | $ | 142,288 | | | $ | 43,836 | | | $ | 22,407 | | | $ | 3,797 | | | $ | 1,385 | |
Trustees’ deferred compensation – Trustees who are unaffiliated with CRMC may elect to defer the cash payment of part or all of their compensation. These deferred amounts, which remain as liabilities of the fund, are treated as if invested in shares of the fund or other American Funds. These amounts represent general, unsecured liabilities of the fund and vary according to the total returns of the selected funds. Trustees’ compensation of $516,000, shown on the accompanying financial statements, includes $416,000 in current fees (either paid in cash or deferred) and a net increase of $100,000 in the value of the deferred amounts.
Affiliated officers and trustees – Officers and certain trustees of the fund are or may be considered to be affiliated with CRMC, AFS and AFD. No affiliated officers or trustees received any compensation directly from the fund.
7. | Capital share transactions |
Capital share transactions in the fund were as follows (dollars and shares in thousands):
| | Sales(*) | | | Reinvestments of dividends | | | Repurchases(*) | | | Net (decrease) increase | |
Share class | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | |
Year ended December 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 3,392,073 | | | | 91,758 | | | $ | 520,075 | | | | 14,599 | | | $ | (5,677,711 | ) | | | (155,320 | ) | | $ | (1,765,563 | ) | | | (48,963 | ) |
Class B | | | 32,613 | | | | 874 | | | | 5,458 | | | | 155 | | | | (217,857 | ) | | | (5,953 | ) | | | (179,786 | ) | | | (4,924 | ) |
Class C | | | 281,376 | | | | 7,592 | | | | 16,389 | | | | 467 | | | | (503,457 | ) | | | (13,829 | ) | | | (205,692 | ) | | | (5,770 | ) |
Class F-1 | | | 1,330,230 | | | | 36,472 | | | | 71,899 | | | | 2,024 | | | | (1,281,303 | ) | | | (35,390 | ) | | | 120,826 | | | | 3,106 | |
Class F-2 | | | 334,821 | | | | 9,069 | | | | 15,306 | | | | 430 | | | | (284,649 | ) | | | (7,845 | ) | | | 65,478 | | | | 1,654 | |
Class 529-A | | | 181,896 | | | | 4,948 | | | | 15,772 | | | | 444 | | | | (99,997 | ) | | | (2,745 | ) | | | 97,671 | | | | 2,647 | |
Class 529-B | | | 2,972 | | | | 80 | | | | 420 | | | | 12 | | | | (17,040 | ) | | | (467 | ) | | | (13,648 | ) | | | (375 | ) |
Class 529-C | | | 51,372 | | | | 1,398 | | | | 2,269 | | | | 65 | | | | (35,520 | ) | | | (977 | ) | | | 18,121 | | | | 486 | |
Class 529-E | | | 7,960 | | | | 217 | | | | 577 | | | | 16 | | | | (5,556 | ) | | | (153 | ) | | | 2,981 | | | | 80 | |
Class 529-F-1 | | | 11,461 | | | | 309 | | | | 733 | | | | 21 | | | | (7,219 | ) | | | (198 | ) | | | 4,975 | | | | 132 | |
Class R-1 | | | 40,549 | | | | 1,102 | | | | 1,313 | | | | 38 | | | | (32,388 | ) | | | (890 | ) | | | 9,474 | | | | 250 | |
Class R-2 | | | 178,515 | | | | 4,861 | | | | 5,649 | | | | 161 | | | | (203,444 | ) | | | (5,569 | ) | | | (19,280 | ) | | | (547 | ) |
Class R-3 | | | 602,532 | | | | 16,398 | | | | 30,079 | | | | 850 | | | | (582,412 | ) | | | (15,920 | ) | | | 50,199 | | | | 1,328 | |
Class R-4 | | | 799,484 | | | | 21,675 | | | | 36,518 | | | | 1,028 | | | | (672,841 | ) | | | (18,555 | ) | | | 163,161 | | | | 4,148 | |
Class R-5 | | | 436,104 | | | | 12,043 | | | | 27,512 | | | | 772 | | | | (435,283 | ) | | | (12,089 | ) | | | 28,333 | | | | 726 | |
Class R-6 | | | 646,485 | | | | 17,551 | | | | 26,179 | | | | 738 | | | | (148,792 | ) | | | (4,016 | ) | | | 523,872 | | | | 14,273 | |
Total net increase | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(decrease) | | $ | 8,330,443 | | | | 226,347 | | | $ | 776,148 | | | | 21,820 | | | $ | (10,205,469 | ) | | | (279,916 | ) | | $ | (1,098,878 | ) | | | (31,749 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended December 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 3,363,931 | | | | 100,692 | | | $ | 502,448 | | | | 15,020 | | | $ | (5,287,374 | ) | | | (159,761 | ) | | $ | (1,420,995 | ) | | | (44,049 | ) |
Class B | | | 33,827 | | | | 1,016 | | | | 6,834 | | | | 203 | | | | (276,082 | ) | | | (8,334 | ) | | | (235,421 | ) | | | (7,115 | ) |
Class C | | | 298,138 | | | | 8,974 | | | | 16,968 | | | | 504 | | | | (381,354 | ) | | | (11,579 | ) | | | (66,248 | ) | | | (2,101 | ) |
Class F-1 | | | 1,239,671 | | | | 37,371 | | | | 63,906 | | | | 1,912 | | | | (1,301,972 | ) | | | (39,467 | ) | | | 1,605 | | | | (184 | ) |
Class F-2 | | | 366,241 | | | | 10,977 | | | | 11,752 | | | | 351 | | | | (222,407 | ) | | | (6,699 | ) | | | 155,586 | | | | 4,629 | |
Class 529-A | | | 157,006 | | | | 4,699 | | | | 13,220 | | | | 395 | | | | (73,466 | ) | | | (2,219 | ) | | | 96,760 | | | | 2,875 | |
Class 529-B | | | 2,618 | | | | 78 | | | | 530 | | | | 16 | | | | (17,463 | ) | | | (523 | ) | | | (14,315 | ) | | | (429 | ) |
Class 529-C | | | 45,797 | | | | 1,371 | | | | 2,047 | | | | 61 | | | | (25,887 | ) | | | (781 | ) | | | 21,957 | | | | 651 | |
Class 529-E | | | 7,077 | | | | 211 | | | | 485 | | | | 14 | | | | (3,288 | ) | | | (99 | ) | | | 4,274 | | | | 126 | |
Class 529-F-1 | | | 9,722 | | | | 292 | | | | 595 | | | | 18 | | | | (4,787 | ) | | | (142 | ) | | | 5,530 | | | | 168 | |
Class R-1 | | | 50,584 | | | | 1,528 | | | | 1,142 | | | | 34 | | | | (25,889 | ) | | | (784 | ) | | | 25,837 | | | | 778 | |
Class R-2 | | | 176,158 | | | | 5,322 | | | | 5,364 | | | | 159 | | | | (168,070 | ) | | | (5,082 | ) | | | 13,452 | | | | 399 | |
Class R-3 | | | 708,464 | | | | 21,359 | | | | 26,982 | | | | 804 | | | | (495,947 | ) | | | (14,982 | ) | | | 239,499 | | | | 7,181 | |
Class R-4 | | | 683,852 | | | | 20,549 | | | | 29,929 | | | | 894 | | | | (418,514 | ) | | | (12,755 | ) | | | 295,267 | | | | 8,688 | |
Class R-5 | | | 365,246 | | | | 11,013 | | | | 26,411 | | | | 789 | | | | (400,796 | ) | | | (11,927 | ) | | | (9,139 | ) | | | (125 | ) |
Class R-6 | | | 330,441 | | | | 10,094 | | | | 15,526 | | | | 464 | | | | (94,419 | ) | | | (2,889 | ) | | | 251,548 | | | | 7,669 | |
Total net increase | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(decrease) | | $ | 7,838,773 | | | | 235,546 | | | $ | 724,139 | | | | 21,638 | | | $ | (9,197,715 | ) | | | (278,023 | ) | | $ | (634,803 | ) | | | (20,839 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
* Includes exchanges between share classes of the fund. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
8. | Investment transactions |
The fund made purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities and U.S. government obligations, if any, of $13,123,169,000 and $13,792,864,000, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2011.
Financial highlights
| | | | | (Loss) income from investment operations(1) | | | Dividends and distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Net asset value, beginning of period | | | Net investment income(2)(3) | | | Net (losses) gains on securities (both realized and unrealized) | | | Total from investment operations | | | Dividends (from net investment income) | | | Distributions (from capital gains) | | | Total dividends and distributions | | | Net asset value, end of period | | | Total return(4) (5) | | | Net assets, end of period (in millions) | | | Ratio of expenses to average net assets before reimbursements/ waivers | | | Ratio of expenses to average net assets after reimbursements/ waivers(5) | | | Ratio of net income to average net assets(2)(3)(5) | |
Class A: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | $ | 36.70 | | | $ | .60 | | | $ | (1.29 | ) | | $ | (.69 | ) | | $ | (.62 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (.62 | ) | | $ | 35.39 | | | | (1.89 | )% | | $ | 30,176 | | | | .63 | % | | | .63 | % | | | 1.62 | % |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.73 | | | | .59 | | | | 3.95 | | | | 4.54 | | | | (.57 | ) | | | - | | | | (.57 | ) | | | 36.70 | | | | 14.05 | | | | 33,089 | | | | .64 | | | | .64 | | | | 1.78 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.98 | | | | .44 | | | | 7.79 | | | | 8.23 | | | | (.48 | ) | | | - | | | | (.48 | ) | | | 32.73 | | | | 33.36 | | | | 30,954 | | | | .69 | | | | .69 | | | | 1.60 | |
Year ended 12/31/2008 | | | 42.45 | | | | .60 | | | | (17.23 | ) | | | (16.63 | ) | | | (.58 | ) | | | (.26 | ) | | | (.84 | ) | | | 24.98 | | | | (39.70 | ) | | | 24,443 | | | | .63 | | | | .61 | | | | 1.70 | |
Year ended 12/31/2007 | | | 40.05 | | | | 1.03 | | | | 4.39 | | | | 5.42 | | | | (.95 | ) | | | (2.07 | ) | | | (3.02 | ) | | | 42.45 | | | | 13.55 | | | | 38,877 | | | | .60 | | | | .57 | | | | 2.40 | |
Class B: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | | 36.60 | | | | .31 | | | | (1.28 | ) | | | (.97 | ) | | | (.33 | ) | | | - | | | | (.33 | ) | | | 35.30 | | | | (2.64 | ) | | | 545 | | | | 1.40 | | | | 1.40 | | | | .85 | |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.64 | | | | .33 | | | | 3.94 | | | | 4.27 | | | | (.31 | ) | | | - | | | | (.31 | ) | | | 36.60 | | | | 13.18 | | | | 746 | | | | 1.41 | | | | 1.41 | | | | 1.01 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.92 | | | | .23 | | | | 7.76 | | | | 7.99 | | | | (.27 | ) | | | - | | | | (.27 | ) | | | 32.64 | | | | 32.30 | | | | 897 | | | | 1.46 | | | | 1.46 | | | | .85 | |
Year ended 12/31/2008 | | | 42.35 | | | | .34 | | | | (17.20 | ) | | | (16.86 | ) | | | (.31 | ) | | | (.26 | ) | | | (.57 | ) | | | 24.92 | | | | (40.14 | ) | | | 924 | | | | 1.39 | | | | 1.37 | | | | .94 | |
Year ended 12/31/2007 | | | 39.96 | | | | .70 | | | | 4.38 | | | | 5.08 | | | | (.62 | ) | | | (2.07 | ) | | | (2.69 | ) | | | 42.35 | | | | 12.70 | | | | 1,667 | | | | 1.36 | | | | 1.33 | | | | 1.63 | |
Class C: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | | 36.56 | | | | .30 | | | | (1.28 | ) | | | (.98 | ) | | | (.32 | ) | | | - | | | | (.32 | ) | | | 35.26 | | | | (2.67 | ) | | | 1,804 | | | | 1.44 | | | | 1.44 | | | | .82 | |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.61 | | | | .32 | | | | 3.94 | | | | 4.26 | | | | (.31 | ) | | | - | | | | (.31 | ) | | | 36.56 | | | | 13.13 | | | | 2,081 | | | | 1.44 | | | | 1.44 | | | | .98 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.90 | | | | .22 | | | | 7.75 | | | | 7.97 | | | | (.26 | ) | | | - | | | | (.26 | ) | | | 32.61 | | | | 32.26 | | | | 1,925 | | | | 1.48 | | | | 1.48 | | | | .81 | |
Year ended 12/31/2008 | | | 42.31 | | | | .32 | | | | (17.17 | ) | | | (16.85 | ) | | | (.30 | ) | | | (.26 | ) | | | (.56 | ) | | | 24.90 | | | | (40.16 | ) | | | 1,468 | | | | 1.43 | | | | 1.41 | | | | .90 | |
Year ended 12/31/2007 | | | 39.92 | | | | .70 | | | | 4.36 | | | | 5.06 | | | | (.60 | ) | | | (2.07 | ) | | | (2.67 | ) | | | 42.31 | | | | 12.65 | | | | 2,053 | | | | 1.41 | | | | 1.38 | | | | 1.62 | |
Class F-1: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | | 36.68 | | | | .59 | | | | (1.29 | ) | | | (.70 | ) | | | (.61 | ) | | | - | | | | (.61 | ) | | | 35.37 | | | | (1.92 | ) | | | 4,285 | | | | .67 | | | | .67 | | | | 1.60 | |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.72 | | | | .59 | | | | 3.93 | | | | 4.52 | | | | (.56 | ) | | | - | | | | (.56 | ) | | | 36.68 | | | | 14.01 | | | | 4,330 | | | | .66 | | | | .66 | | | | 1.77 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.97 | | | | .45 | | | | 7.79 | | | | 8.24 | | | | (.49 | ) | | | - | | | | (.49 | ) | | | 32.72 | | | | 33.40 | | | | 3,868 | | | | .67 | | | | .67 | | | | 1.61 | |
Year ended 12/31/2008 | | | 42.43 | | | | .60 | | | | (17.22 | ) | | | (16.62 | ) | | | (.58 | ) | | | (.26 | ) | | | (.84 | ) | | | 24.97 | | | | (39.69 | ) | | | 2,932 | | | | .62 | | | | .60 | | | | 1.72 | |
Year ended 12/31/2007 | | | 40.03 | | | | 1.06 | | | | 4.36 | | | | 5.42 | | | | (.95 | ) | | | (2.07 | ) | | | (3.02 | ) | | | 42.43 | | | | 13.55 | | | | 3,235 | | | | .61 | | | | .58 | | | | 2.45 | |
Class F-2: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | | 36.70 | | | | .68 | | | | (1.29 | ) | | | (.61 | ) | | | (.70 | ) | | | - | | | | (.70 | ) | | | 35.39 | | | | (1.67 | ) | | | 915 | | | | .42 | | | | .42 | | | | 1.85 | |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.73 | | | | .67 | | | | 3.95 | | | | 4.62 | | | | (.65 | ) | | | - | | | | (.65 | ) | | | 36.70 | | | | 14.32 | | | | 888 | | | | .40 | | | | .40 | | | | 2.03 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.98 | | | | .49 | | | | 7.81 | | | | 8.30 | | | | (.55 | ) | | | - | | | | (.55 | ) | | | 32.73 | | | | 33.72 | | | | 641 | | | | .43 | | | | .43 | | | | 1.69 | |
Period from 8/1/2008 to 12/31/2008(6) | | | 37.09 | | | | .23 | | | | (11.97 | ) | | | (11.74 | ) | | | (.37 | ) | | | - | | | | (.37 | ) | | | 24.98 | | | | (31.78 | ) | | | 92 | | | | .17 | | | | .16 | | | | .88 | |
Class 529-A: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | | 36.67 | | | | .57 | | | | (1.29 | ) | | | (.72 | ) | | | (.59 | ) | | | - | | | | (.59 | ) | | | 35.36 | | | | (1.97 | ) | | | 977 | | | | .71 | | | | .71 | | | | 1.55 | |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.71 | | | | .58 | | | | 3.93 | | | | 4.51 | | | | (.55 | ) | | | - | | | | (.55 | ) | | | 36.67 | | | | 13.98 | | | | 916 | | | | .69 | | | | .69 | | | | 1.74 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.97 | | | | .43 | | | | 7.78 | | | | 8.21 | | | | (.47 | ) | | | - | | | | (.47 | ) | | | 32.71 | | | | 33.30 | | | | 723 | | | | .73 | | | | .73 | | | | 1.55 | |
Year ended 12/31/2008 | | | 42.42 | | | | .58 | | | | (17.21 | ) | | | (16.63 | ) | | | (.56 | ) | | | (.26 | ) | | | (.82 | ) | | | 24.97 | | | | (39.71 | ) | | | 485 | | | | .68 | | | | .65 | | | | 1.66 | |
Year ended 12/31/2007 | | | 40.02 | | | | 1.03 | | | | 4.36 | | | | 5.39 | | | | (.92 | ) | | | (2.07 | ) | | | (2.99 | ) | | | 42.42 | | | | 13.49 | | | | 643 | | | | .66 | | | | .64 | | | | 2.37 | |
Class 529-B: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | | 36.66 | | | | .27 | | | | (1.28 | ) | | | (1.01 | ) | | | (.29 | ) | | | - | | | | (.29 | ) | | | 35.36 | | | | (2.74 | ) | | | 48 | | | | 1.51 | | | | 1.51 | | | | .74 | |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.69 | | | | .30 | | | | 3.95 | | | | 4.25 | | | | (.28 | ) | | | - | | | | (.28 | ) | | | 36.66 | | | | 13.09 | | | | 63 | | | | 1.50 | | | | 1.50 | | | | .92 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.96 | | | | .20 | | | | 7.77 | | | | 7.97 | | | | (.24 | ) | | | - | | | | (.24 | ) | | | 32.69 | | | | 32.16 | | | | 71 | | | | 1.55 | | | | 1.55 | | | | .74 | |
Year ended 12/31/2008 | | | 42.41 | | | | .30 | | | | (17.22 | ) | | | (16.92 | ) | | | (.27 | ) | | | (.26 | ) | | | (.53 | ) | | | 24.96 | | | | (40.20 | ) | | | 54 | | | | 1.50 | | | | 1.47 | | | | .84 | |
Year ended 12/31/2007 | | | 40.01 | | | | .66 | | | | 4.38 | | | | 5.04 | | | | (.57 | ) | | | (2.07 | ) | | | (2.64 | ) | | | 42.41 | | | | 12.57 | | | | 80 | | | | 1.48 | | | | 1.46 | | | | 1.53 | |
Class 529-C: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | | 36.64 | | | | .28 | | | | (1.28 | ) | | | (1.00 | ) | | | (.30 | ) | | | - | | | | (.30 | ) | | | 35.34 | | | | (2.72 | ) | | | 273 | | | | 1.51 | | | | 1.51 | | | | .76 | |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.69 | | | | .31 | | | | 3.93 | | | | 4.24 | | | | (.29 | ) | | | - | | | | (.29 | ) | | | 36.64 | | | | 13.05 | | | | 265 | | | | 1.49 | | | | 1.49 | | | | .94 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.95 | | | | .20 | | | | 7.78 | | | | 7.98 | | | | (.24 | ) | | | - | | | | (.24 | ) | | | 32.69 | | | | 32.22 | | | | 215 | | | | 1.55 | | | | 1.55 | | | | .74 | |
Year ended 12/31/2008 | | | 42.40 | | | | .30 | | | | (17.22 | ) | | | (16.92 | ) | | | (.27 | ) | | | (.26 | ) | | | (.53 | ) | | | 24.95 | | | | (40.21 | ) | | | 147 | | | | 1.49 | | | | 1.47 | | | | .85 | |
Year ended 12/31/2007 | | | 40.00 | | | | .67 | | | | 4.37 | | | | 5.04 | | | | (.57 | ) | | | (2.07 | ) | | | (2.64 | ) | | | 42.40 | | | | 12.58 | | | | 195 | | | | 1.48 | | | | 1.45 | | | | 1.56 | |
Class 529-E: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | | 36.65 | | | | .47 | | | | (1.29 | ) | | | (.82 | ) | | | (.49 | ) | | | - | | | | (.49 | ) | | | 35.34 | | | | (2.23 | ) | | | 42 | | | | .98 | | | | .98 | | | | 1.29 | |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.69 | | | | .48 | | | | 3.94 | | | | 4.42 | | | | (.46 | ) | | | - | | | | (.46 | ) | | | 36.65 | | | | 13.66 | | | | 41 | | | | .98 | | | | .98 | | | | 1.45 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.95 | | | | .34 | | | | 7.78 | | | | 8.12 | | | | (.38 | ) | | | - | | | | (.38 | ) | | | 32.69 | | | | 32.89 | | | | 32 | | | | 1.04 | | | | 1.04 | | | | 1.24 | |
Year ended 12/31/2008 | | | 42.40 | | | | .48 | | | | (17.21 | ) | | | (16.73 | ) | | | (.46 | ) | | | (.26 | ) | | | (.72 | ) | | | 24.95 | | | | (39.90 | ) | | | 21 | | | | .98 | | | | .96 | | | | 1.36 | |
Year ended 12/31/2007 | | | 40.00 | | | | .88 | | | | 4.38 | | | | 5.26 | | | | (.79 | ) | | | (2.07 | ) | | | (2.86 | ) | | | 42.40 | | | | 13.14 | | | | 29 | | | | .97 | | | | .95 | | | | 2.05 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-F-1: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | $ | 36.65 | | | $ | .65 | | | $ | (1.30 | ) | | $ | (.65 | ) | | $ | (.67 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (.67 | ) | | $ | 35.33 | | | | (1.75 | )% | | $ | 40 | | | | .50 | % | | | .50 | % | | | 1.77 | % |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.69 | | | | .65 | | | | 3.93 | | | | 4.58 | | | | (.62 | ) | | | - | | | | (.62 | ) | | | 36.65 | | | | 14.22 | | | | 37 | | | | .48 | | | | .48 | | | | 1.95 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.95 | | | | .48 | | | | 7.78 | | | | 8.26 | | | | (.52 | ) | | | - | | | | (.52 | ) | | | 32.69 | | | | 33.56 | | | | 27 | | | | .54 | | | | .54 | | | | 1.74 | |
Year ended 12/31/2008 | | | 42.39 | | | | .64 | | | | 17.19 | ) | | | (16.55 | ) | | | (.63 | ) | | | (.26 | ) | | | (.89 | ) | | | 24.95 | | | | (39.59 | ) | | | 20 | | | | .48 | | | | .46 | | | | 1.84 | |
Year ended 12/31/2007 | | | 40.00 | | | | 1.13 | | | | 4.33 | | | | 5.46 | | | | 1.00 | ) | | | (2.07 | ) | | | (3.07 | ) | | | 42.39 | | | | 13.69 | | | | 20 | | | | .47 | | | | .45 | | | | 2.62 | |
Class R-1: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | | 36.56 | | | | .31 | | | | (1.28 | ) | | | (.97 | ) | | | (.33 | ) | | | - | | | | (.33 | ) | | | 35.26 | | | | (2.65 | ) | | | 142 | | | | 1.43 | | | | 1.43 | | | | .84 | |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.62 | | | | .33 | | | | 3.93 | | | | 4.26 | | | | (.32 | ) | | | - | | | | (.32 | ) | | | 36.56 | | | | 13.13 | | | | 138 | | | | 1.43 | | | | 1.43 | | | | 1.01 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.90 | | | | .22 | | | | 7.76 | | | | 7.98 | | | | (.26 | ) | | | - | | | | (.26 | ) | | | 32.62 | | | | 32.30 | | | | 98 | | | | 1.47 | | | | 1.47 | | | | .80 | |
Year ended 12/31/2008 | | | 42.31 | | | | .32 | | | | (17.18 | ) | | | (16.86 | ) | | | (.29 | ) | | | (.26 | ) | | | (.55 | ) | | | 24.90 | | | | (40.16 | ) | | | 61 | | | | 1.43 | | | | 1.41 | | | | .91 | |
Year ended 12/31/2007 | | | 39.93 | | | | .72 | | | | 4.33 | | | | 5.05 | | | | (.60 | ) | | | (2.07 | ) | | | (2.67 | ) | | | 42.31 | | | | 12.62 | | | | 57 | | | | 1.44 | | | | 1.42 | | | | 1.67 | |
Class R-2: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | | 36.56 | | | | .31 | | | | (1.28 | ) | | | (.97 | ) | | | (.33 | ) | | | - | | | | (.33 | ) | | | 35.26 | | | | (2.64 | ) | | | 589 | | | | 1.41 | | | | 1.41 | | | | .85 | |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.61 | | | | .33 | | | | 3.93 | | | | 4.26 | | | | (.31 | ) | | | - | | | | (.31 | ) | | | 36.56 | | | | 13.15 | | | | 631 | | | | 1.42 | | | | 1.42 | | | | 1.00 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.89 | | | | .21 | | | | 7.76 | | | | 7.97 | | | | (.25 | ) | | | - | | | | (.25 | ) | | | 32.61 | | | | 32.22 | | | | 550 | | | | 1.52 | | | | 1.52 | | | | .77 | |
Year ended 12/31/2008 | | | 42.30 | | | | .30 | | | | (17.17 | ) | | | (16.87 | ) | | | (.28 | ) | | | (.26 | ) | | | (.54 | ) | | | 24.89 | | | | (40.19 | ) | | | 366 | | | | 1.49 | | | | 1.47 | | | | .85 | |
Year ended 12/31/2007 | | | 39.92 | | | | .70 | | | | 4.34 | | | | 5.04 | | | | (.59 | ) | | | (2.07 | ) | | | (2.66 | ) | | | 42.30 | | | | 12.61 | | | | 471 | | | | 1.46 | | | | 1.40 | | | | 1.62 | |
Class R-3: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | | 36.63 | | | | .48 | | | | (1.29 | ) | | | (.81 | ) | | | (.50 | ) | | | - | | | | (.50 | ) | | | 35.32 | | | | (2.22 | ) | | | 2,146 | | | | .96 | | | | .96 | | | | 1.30 | |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.67 | | | | .49 | | | | 3.94 | | | | 4.43 | | | | (.47 | ) | | | - | | | | (.47 | ) | | | 36.63 | | | | 13.69 | | | | 2,177 | | | | .96 | | | | .96 | | | | 1.47 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.94 | | | | .36 | | | | 7.77 | | | | 8.13 | | | | (.40 | ) | | | - | | | | (.40 | ) | | | 32.67 | | | | 32.93 | | | | 1,707 | | | | .99 | | | | .99 | | | | 1.29 | |
Year ended 12/31/2008 | | | 42.38 | | | | .48 | | | | (17.20 | ) | | | (16.72 | ) | | | (.46 | ) | | | (.26 | ) | | | (.72 | ) | | | 24.94 | | | | (39.89 | ) | | | 1,058 | | | | .98 | | | | .95 | | | | 1.37 | |
Year ended 12/31/2007 | | | 39.98 | | | | .92 | | | | 4.34 | | | | 5.26 | | | | (.79 | ) | | | (2.07 | ) | | | (2.86 | ) | | | 42.38 | | | | 13.17 | | | | 1,157 | | | | .97 | | | | .94 | | | | 2.12 | |
Class R-4: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | | 36.64 | | | | .59 | | | | (1.30 | ) | | | (.71 | ) | | | (.60 | ) | | | - | | | | (.60 | ) | | | 35.33 | | | | (1.92 | ) | | | 2,123 | | | | .66 | | | | .66 | | | | 1.60 | |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.68 | | | | .59 | | | | 3.93 | | | | 4.52 | | | | (.56 | ) | | | - | | | | (.56 | ) | | | 36.64 | | | | 14.02 | | | | 2,050 | | | | .66 | | | | .66 | | | | 1.77 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.95 | | | | .44 | | | | 7.77 | | | | 8.21 | | | | (.48 | ) | | | - | | | | (.48 | ) | | | 32.68 | | | | 33.31 | | | | 1,545 | | | | .69 | | | | .69 | | | | 1.58 | |
Year ended 12/31/2008 | | | 42.39 | | | | .58 | | | | (17.19 | ) | | | (16.61 | ) | | | (.57 | ) | | | (.26 | ) | | | (.83 | ) | | | 24.95 | | | | (39.70 | ) | | | 942 | | | | .67 | | | | .65 | | | | 1.68 | |
Year ended 12/31/2007 | | | 39.99 | | | | 1.05 | | | | 4.34 | | | | 5.39 | | | | (.92 | ) | | | (2.07 | ) | | | (2.99 | ) | | | 42.39 | | | | 13.51 | | | | 879 | | | | .66 | | | | .64 | | | | 2.42 | |
Class R-5: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | | 36.71 | | | | .70 | | | | (1.30 | ) | | | (.60 | ) | | | (.71 | ) | | | - | | | | (.71 | ) | | | 35.40 | | | | (1.62 | ) | | | 1,394 | | | | .36 | | | | .36 | | | | 1.89 | |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.74 | | | | .69 | | | | 3.94 | | | | 4.63 | | | | (.66 | ) | | | - | | | | (.66 | ) | | | 36.71 | | | | 14.37 | | | | 1,419 | | | | .36 | | | | .36 | | | | 2.06 | |
Year ended 12/31/2009 | | | 24.99 | | | | .52 | | | | 7.79 | | | | 8.31 | | | | (.56 | ) | | | - | | | | (.56 | ) | | | 32.74 | | | | 33.75 | | | | 1,269 | | | | .39 | | | | .39 | | | | 1.92 | |
Year ended 12/31/2008 | | | 42.46 | | | | .69 | | | | (17.23 | ) | | | (16.54 | ) | | | (.67 | ) | | | (.26 | ) | | | (.93 | ) | | | 24.99 | | | | (39.53 | ) | | | 1,077 | | | | .37 | | | | .35 | | | | 1.98 | |
Year ended 12/31/2007 | | | 40.06 | | | | 1.18 | | | | 4.34 | | | | 5.52 | | | | (1.05 | ) | | | (2.07 | ) | | | (3.12 | ) | | | 42.46 | | | | 13.81 | | | | 1,014 | | | | .37 | | | | .34 | | | | 2.73 | |
Class R-6: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 12/31/2011 | | | 36.70 | | | | .72 | | | | (1.30 | ) | | | (.58 | ) | | | (.73 | ) | | | - | | | | (.73 | ) | | | 35.39 | | | | (1.57 | ) | | | 1,421 | | | | .31 | | | | .31 | | | | 1.97 | |
Year ended 12/31/2010 | | | 32.74 | | | | .71 | | | | 3.93 | | | | 4.64 | | | | (.68 | ) | | | - | | | | (.68 | ) | | | 36.70 | | | | 14.39 | | | | 950 | | | | .32 | | | | .32 | | | | 2.13 | |
Period from 5/1/2009 to 12/31/2009(6) | | | 25.63 | | | | .37 | | | | 7.17 | | | | 7.54 | | | | (.43 | ) | | | - | | | | (.43 | ) | | | 32.74 | | | | 29.60 | | | | 596 | | | | .35 | (7) | | | .35 | (7) | | | 1.87 | (7) |
Expense example
unaudited
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as initial sales charges on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions (loads), and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund so you can compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire six-month period (July 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011).
Actual expenses:
The first line of each share class in the table on the next page provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled "Expenses paid during period" to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes:
The second line of each share class in the table on the next page provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio for the share class and an assumed rate of return of 5.00% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of the share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5.00% hypothetical example with the 5.00% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Notes:
There are some account fees that are charged to certain types of accounts, such as individual retirement accounts and 529 college savings plan accounts (generally, a $10 fee is charged to set up the account and an additional $10 fee is charged to the account annually), that would increase the amount of expenses paid on your account. In addition, retirement plan participants may be subject to certain fees charged by the plan sponsor, and Class F-1, F-2 and 529-F-1 shareholders may be subject to fees charged by financial intermediaries, typically ranging from 0.75% to 1.50% of assets annually depending on services offered. You can estimate the impact of these fees by adding the amount of the fees to the total estimated expenses you paid on your account during the period as calculated above. In addition, your ending account value would be lower by the amount of these fees.
Note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line of each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| | Beginning account value 7/1/2011 | | | Ending account value 12/31/2011 | | | Expenses paid during period* | | | Annualized expense ratio | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A -- actual return | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 924.32 | | | $ | 3.10 | | | | .64 | % |
Class A -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,021.98 | | | | 3.26 | | | | .64 | |
Class B -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 920.45 | | | | 6.83 | | | | 1.41 | |
Class B -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,018.10 | | | | 7.17 | | | | 1.41 | |
Class C -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 920.46 | | | | 6.97 | | | | 1.44 | |
Class C -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,017.95 | | | | 7.32 | | | | 1.44 | |
Class F-1 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 924.15 | | | | 3.30 | | | | .68 | |
Class F-1 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,021.78 | | | | 3.47 | | | | .68 | |
Class F-2 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 925.41 | | | | 2.04 | | | | .42 | |
Class F-2 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,023.09 | | | | 2.14 | | | | .42 | |
Class 529-A -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 923.85 | | | | 3.54 | | | | .73 | |
Class 529-A -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,021.53 | | | | 3.72 | | | | .73 | |
Class 529-B -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 920.24 | | | | 7.41 | | | | 1.53 | |
Class 529-B -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,017.49 | | | | 7.78 | | | | 1.53 | |
Class 529-C -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 920.25 | | | | 7.41 | | | | 1.53 | |
Class 529-C -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,017.49 | | | | 7.78 | | | | 1.53 | |
Class 529-E -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 922.66 | | | | 4.75 | | | | .98 | |
Class 529-E -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,020.27 | | | | 4.99 | | | | .98 | |
Class 529-F-1 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 924.85 | | | | 2.52 | | | | .52 | |
Class 529-F-1 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,022.58 | | | | 2.65 | | | | .52 | |
Class R-1 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 920.57 | | | | 6.92 | | | | 1.43 | |
Class R-1 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,018.00 | | | | 7.27 | | | | 1.43 | |
Class R-2 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 920.57 | | | | 6.92 | | | | 1.43 | |
Class R-2 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,018.00 | | | | 7.27 | | | | 1.43 | |
Class R-3 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 922.63 | | | | 4.65 | | | | .96 | |
Class R-3 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,020.37 | | | | 4.89 | | | | .96 | |
Class R-4 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 924.09 | | | | 3.25 | | | | .67 | |
Class R-4 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,021.83 | | | | 3.41 | | | | .67 | |
Class R-5 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 925.43 | | | | 1.80 | | | | .37 | |
Class R-5 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,023.34 | | | | 1.89 | | | | .37 | |
Class R-6 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 925.66 | | | | 1.55 | | | | .32 | |
Class R-6 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,023.59 | | | | 1.63 | | | | .32 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
*The “expenses paid during period” are equal to the “annualized expense ratio,” multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, and divided by 365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Tax information
unaudited
We are required to advise you of the federal tax status of certain distributions received by shareholders during the fiscal year. The fund hereby designates the following amounts for the fund’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2011:
Qualified dividend income | | | 100 | % |
Corporate dividends received deduction | | $ | 743,629,000 | |
U.S. government income that may be exempt from state taxation | | $ | 731,000 | |
Individual shareholders should refer to their Form 1099 or other tax information, which will be mailed in January 2012, to determine the calendar year amounts to be included on their 2011 tax returns. Shareholders should consult their tax advisers.
Approval of Investment Advisory and Service Agreement
The fund’s board has approved the fund’s Investment Advisory and Service Agreement (the “agreement”) with Capital Research and Management Company (“CRMC”) for an additional one-year term through November 30, 2012. The board approved the agreement following the recommendation of the fund’s Contracts Committee (the “committee”), which is composed of all of the fund’s independent board members. The board and the committee determined that the fund’s advisory fee structure was fair and reasonable in relation to the services provided and that approving the agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
In reaching this decision, the board and the committee took into account information furnished to them throughout the year, as well as information prepared specifically in connection with their review of the agreement, and were advised by their independent counsel. They considered the factors discussed below, among others, but did not identify any single issue or particular piece of information that, in isolation, was the controlling factor.
1. Nature, extent and quality of services
The board and the committee considered the depth and quality of CRMC’s investment management process, including its global research capabilities; the experience, capability and integrity of its senior management and other personnel; the low turnover rates of its key personnel; the overall financial strength and stability of its organization; and the ongoing evolution of CRMC’s organizational structure designed to maintain and strengthen these qualities. The board and the committee also considered the nature, extent and quality of administrative, compliance and shareholder services provided by CRMC to the fund under the agreement and other agreements as well as the benefits to fund shareholders from investing in a fund that is part of a large family of funds. The board and the committee concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by CRMC have benefited and should continue to benefit the fund and its shareholders.
2. Investment results
The board and the committee considered the investment results of the fund in light of its objective of providing long-term growth of capital and income. They compared the fund’s total returns with those of other relevant funds (including the other funds that are the basis of the Lipper index for the category in which the fund is included) and market data such as relevant market indices, in each case as available at the time of the related board and committee meetings. This report, including the letter to shareholders and related disclosures, contains certain information about the fund’s investment results. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s long-term results have been satisfactory and that CRMC’s record in managing the fund indicated that its continued management should benefit the fund and its shareholders.
3. Advisory fees and total expenses
The board and the committee compared the advisory fees and total expense levels of the fund to those of other relevant funds. They observed that the fund’s advisory fees and expenses remain significantly below those of most other relevant funds. The board and the committee also noted the breakpoint discounts in the fund’s advisory fee structure that reduce the level of fees charged by CRMC to the fund as fund assets increase. In addition, they reviewed information regarding the advisory fees paid by clients of an affiliate of CRMC. They noted that, to the extent there were differences between the advisory fees paid by the fund and the advisory fees paid by those clients, the differences appropriately reflected the investment, operational and regulatory differences between advising the fund and the other clients. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s cost structure was fair and reasonable in relation to the services provided, and that the shareholders receive reasonable value in return for the advisory fees and other amounts paid to CRMC by the fund.
4. Ancillary benefits
The board and the committee considered a variety of other benefits received by CRMC and its affiliates as a result of CRMC’s relationship with the fund and the other American Funds, including fees for administrative services provided to certain share classes; fees paid to CRMC’s affiliated transfer agent; sales charges and distribution fees received and retained by the fund’s principal underwriter, an affiliate of CRMC; and possible ancillary benefits to CRMC’s institutional management affiliates. The board and the committee reviewed CRMC’s portfolio trading practices, noting that while CRMC receives the benefit of research provided by broker-dealers executing portfolio transactions on behalf of the fund, it does not obtain third-party research or other services in return for allocating brokerage to such broker-dealers. The board and the committee took these ancillary benefits into account in evaluating the reasonableness of the advisory fees and other amounts paid to CRMC by the fund.
5. Adviser financial information
The board and the committee reviewed information regarding CRMC’s costs of providing services to the American Funds, including personnel, systems and resources of investment, compliance, trading, accounting and other administrative operations. They considered CRMC’s costs and willingness to invest in technology, infrastructure and staff to maintain and expand services and capabilities, respond to industry and regulatory developments, and attract and retain qualified personnel. They noted information regarding the compensation structure for CRMC’s investment professionals. The board and the committee also compared CRMC’s profitability to the reported results of several large, publicly held investment management companies. The board and the committee noted the competitiveness and cyclicality of both the mutual fund industry and the capital markets, and the importance in that environment of CRMC’s long-term profitability for maintaining its independence, company culture and management continuity. They further considered the breakpoint discounts in the fund’s advisory fee structure. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s advisory fee structure reflected a reasonable sharing of benefits between CRMC and the fund’s shareholders.
Other share class results
unaudited
Classes B, C, F and 529
Fund results shown are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Average annual total returns for periods ended December 31, 2011: | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | 10 years1/ | |
| | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | Life of class | |
Class B shares2 | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting applicable contingent deferred sales charge | | | | | | | | | |
(CDSC), maximum of 5%, payable only if shares are | | | | | | | | | |
sold within six years of purchase | | | –7.46 | % | | | –0.69 | % | | | 4.75 | % |
Not reflecting CDSC | | | –2.64 | | | | –0.33 | | | | 4.75 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C shares | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting CDSC, maximum of 1%, payable only | | | | | | | | | | | | |
if shares are sold within one year of purchase | | | –3.64 | | | | –0.37 | | | | 4.53 | |
Not reflecting CDSC | | | –2.67 | | | | –0.37 | | | | 4.53 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class F-1 shares3 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged | | | | | | | | | | | | |
by sponsoring firm | | | –1.92 | | | | 0.43 | | | | 5.37 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class F-2 shares3 — first sold 8/1/08 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged | | | | | | | | | | | | |
by sponsoring firm | | | –1.67 | | | | — | | | | 0.74 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-A shares4 — first sold 2/15/02 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting 5.75% maximum sales charge | | | –7.61 | | | | –0.80 | | | | 5.05 | |
Not reflecting maximum sales charge | | | –1.97 | | | | 0.38 | | | | 5.69 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-B shares2,4 — first sold 2/19/02 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting applicable CDSC, maximum of 5%, payable | | | | | | | | | | | | |
only if shares are sold within six years of purchase | | | –7.57 | | | | –0.79 | | | | 5.15 | |
Not reflecting CDSC | | | –2.74 | | | | –0.43 | | | | 5.15 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-C shares4 — first sold 2/15/02 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting CDSC, maximum of 1%, payable only | | | | | | | | | | | | |
if shares are sold within one year of purchase | | | –3.69 | | | | –0.43 | | | | 4.82 | |
Not reflecting CDSC | | | –2.72 | | | | –0.43 | | | | 4.82 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-E shares3,4 — first sold 3/7/02 | | | –2.23 | | | | 0.08 | | | | 4.79 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-F-1 shares3,4 — first sold 9/23/02 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged | | | | | | | | | | | | |
by sponsoring firm | | | –1.75 | | | | 0.58 | | | | 8.73 | |
| 1Applicable to Classes B, C and F-1 shares only. All other share classes reflect results for the life of the class. |
| 2These shares are not available for purchase. |
| 3These shares are sold without any initial or contingent deferred sales charge. |
| 4Results shown do not reflect the $10 account setup fee and an annual $10 account maintenance fee. |
Investment results assume all distributions are reinvested and reflect applicable fees and expenses. The fund’s investment adviser waived a portion of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through December 31, 2008. Applicable fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. See the Financial Highlights table on pages 27 and 28 for details that include expense ratios for all share classes.
For information regarding the differences among the various share classes, refer to the fund’s prospectus.
Board of trustees and other officers
“Independent” trustees1 | | |
| Year first | |
| elected a | |
| trustee of | |
Name and age | the fund2 | Principal occupation(s) during past five years |
| | |
Ronald P. Badie, 69 | 2008 | Retired; former Vice Chairman, Deutsche Bank |
| | Alex. Brown |
| | |
Joseph C. Berenato, 65 | 2003 | Chairman, Ducommun Incorporated |
Chairman of the Board | | (aerospace components manufacturer); |
(Independent and | | former CEO, Ducommun Incorporated |
Non-Executive) | | |
| | |
Louise H. Bryson, 67 | 2008 | Chair Emerita of the Board of Trustees, J. Paul Getty |
| | Trust; former President, Distribution, Lifetime |
| | Entertainment Network; former Executive Vice |
| | President and General Manager, Lifetime Movie |
| | Network |
| | |
Robert J. Denison, 70 | 2005 | Chair, First Security Management (private investment) |
| | |
Mary Anne Dolan, 64 | 2010 | Founder and President, MAD Ink (communications |
| | company) |
| | |
Robert A. Fox, 74 | 1998 | Managing General Partner, Fox Investments LP; |
| | corporate director |
| | |
John G. Freund, 58 | 2010 | Founder and Managing Director, Skyline Ventures |
| | (venture capital investor in health care companies) |
| | |
Leonade D. Jones, 64 | 1998 | Retired; former Treasurer, The Washington |
| | Post Company |
| | |
William H. Kling, 69 | 2010 | President Emeritus, American Public Media |
| | |
John G. McDonald, 74 | 1998 | Stanford Investors Professor, Graduate School |
| | of Business, Stanford University |
| | |
Christopher E. Stone, 55 | 2010 | Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Professor of the |
| | Practice of Criminal Justice, John F. Kennedy School |
| | of Government, Harvard University |
| | |
| | |
“Independent” trustees1 | | |
| Number of | |
| portfolios | |
| in fund | |
| complex3 | |
| overseen by | |
Name and age | trustee | Other directorships4 held by trustee |
| | |
Ronald P. Badie, 69 | 3 | Amphenol Corporation; Nautilus, Inc.; |
| | Obagi Medical Products, Inc. |
| | |
Joseph C. Berenato, 65 | 6 | None |
Chairman of the Board | | |
(Independent and | | |
Non-Executive) | | |
| | |
Louise H. Bryson, 67 | 7 | None |
| | |
Robert J. Denison, 70 | 6 | None |
| | |
Mary Anne Dolan, 64 | 10 | None |
| | |
Robert A. Fox, 74 | 9 | None |
| | |
John G. Freund, 58 | 3 | Mako Surgical Corporation; XenoPort, Inc. |
| | |
Leonade D. Jones, 64 | 9 | None |
| | |
William H. Kling, 69 | 10 | None |
| | |
John G. McDonald, 74 | 13 | iStar Financial, Inc.; Plum Creek Timber Co.; |
| | QuinStreet, Inc.; Scholastic Corporation |
| | |
Christopher E. Stone, 55 | 6 | None |
“Interested” trustees5 | | |
| Year first | |
| elected a | |
| trustee or | Principal occupation(s) during past five years and |
Name, age and | officer of | positions held with affiliated entities or the |
position with fund | the fund2 | principal underwriter of the fund |
| | |
James F. Rothenberg, 65 | 1998 | Vice Chairman of the Board, Capital Research and |
Vice Chairman | | Management Company; Director and |
of the Board | | Non-Executive Chair, American Funds Distributors, |
| | Inc.;6 Director and Non-Executive Chair, The Capital |
| | Group Companies, Inc.6 |
| | |
Dina N. Perry, 66 | 1994 | Senior Vice President — Capital World Investors, |
President | | Capital Research and Management Company; |
| | Director, Capital Research and Management |
| | Company |
| | |
| | |
“Interested” trustees5 | | |
| Number of | |
| portfolios | |
| in fund | |
| complex3 | |
Name, age and | overseen by | |
position with fund | trustee | Other directorships4 held by trustee |
| | |
James F. Rothenberg, 65 | 2 | None |
Vice Chairman | | |
of the Board | | |
| | |
Dina N. Perry, 66 | 1 | None |
President | | |
The fund’s statement of additional information includes further details about fund trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling American Funds Service Company at 800/421-4225 or by visiting the American Funds website at americanfunds.com. The address for all trustees and officers of the fund is 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071, Attention: Secretary.
See page 36 for footnotes.
Other officers7 | | |
| Year first | |
| elected | Principal occupation(s) during past five years |
Name, age and | an officer | and positions held with affiliated entities or the |
position with fund | of the fund2 | principal underwriter of the fund |
| | |
Paul G. Haaga, Jr., 63 | 1994 | Chairman of the Board, Capital Research and |
Executive Vice President | | Management Company; Senior Vice President — |
| | Fixed Income, Capital Research and Management |
| | Company |
| | |
Michael T. Kerr, 52 | 1995 | Senior Vice President — Capital World Investors, |
Senior Vice President | | Capital Research and Management Company; |
| | Director, Capital Research and Management |
| | Company |
| | |
Martin Romo, 44 | 1999 | Director, Capital Research and Management |
Senior Vice President | | Company; Senior Vice President — Capital World |
| | Investors, Capital Research Company;6 Director and |
| | Co-President, Capital Research Company6 |
| | |
Walter R. Burkley, 45 | 2010 | Senior Vice President and Senior Counsel — Fund |
Vice President | | Business Management Group, Capital Research and |
| | Management Company |
| | |
Mark L. Casey, 41 | 2008 | Senior Vice President — Capital World Investors, |
Vice President | | Capital Research Company;6 Director, Capital |
| | Research Company6 |
| | |
Ronald B. Morrow, 66 | 2004 | Senior Vice President — Capital World Investors, |
Vice President | | Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Patrick F. Quan, 53 | 1989–1998 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Secretary | 2000 | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Jeffrey P. Regal, 40 | 2006 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Treasurer | | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Julie E. Lawton, 38 | 2010 | Assistant Vice President — Fund Business |
Assistant Secretary | | Management Group, Capital Research and |
| | Management Company |
| | |
Dori Laskin, 60 | 2011 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Assistant Treasurer | | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Neal F. Wellons, 40 | 2010 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Assistant Treasurer | | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| 1The term “independent” trustee refers to a trustee who is not an “interested person” of the fund within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940. |
| 2Trustees and officers of the fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement. |
| 3Capital Research and Management Company manages the American Funds, consisting of 33 funds. Capital Research and Management Company also manages American Funds Insurance Series,® which is composed of 18 funds and serves as the underlying investment vehicle for certain variable insurance contracts; and American Funds Target Date Retirement Series,® which is composed of 10 funds and is available through tax-deferred retirement plans and IRAs. |
| 4This includes all directorships (other than those in the American Funds or other funds managed by Capital Research and Management Company) that are held by each trustee as a trustee or director of a public company or a registered investment company. |
| 5“Interested persons” within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, on the basis of their affiliation with the fund’s investment adviser, Capital Research and Management Company, or affiliated entities (including the fund’s principal underwriter). |
| 6Company affiliated with Capital Research and Management Company. |
| 7All of the officers listed, except Mark L. Casey, are officers and/or directors/trustees of one or more of the other funds for which Capital Research and Management Company serves as investment adviser. |
Office of the fund
One Market
Steuart Tower, Suite 2000
Mailing address: P.O. Box 7650
San Francisco, CA 94120-7650
Investment adviser
Capital Research and Management Company
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
6455 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA 92618
Transfer agent for shareholder accounts
American Funds Service Company
(Write to the address near you.)
P.O. Box 6007
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6007
P.O. Box 2280
Norfolk, VA 23501-2280
Custodian of assets
State Street Bank and Trust Company
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111
Counsel
K&L Gates LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111-5994
Independent registered public accounting firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
695 Town Center Drive
Suite 1200
Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7188
Principal underwriter
American Funds Distributors, Inc.
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the American Funds. This and other important information is contained in the fund’s prospectus and summary prospectus, which can be obtained from your financial professional and should be read carefully before investing. You may also call American Funds Service Company (AFS) at 800/421-4225 or visit the American Funds website at americanfunds.com.
“American Funds Proxy Voting Procedures and Principles” — which describes how we vote proxies relating to portfolio securities — is available on the American Funds website or upon request by calling AFS. The fund files its proxy voting record with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the 12 months ended June 30 by August 31. The proxy voting record is available free of charge on the SEC website at sec.gov and on the American Funds website.
A complete December 31, 2011, portfolio of Fundamental Investors’ investments is available free of charge by calling AFS or visiting the SEC website (where it is part of Form N-CSR).
Fundamental Investors files a complete list of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. This filing is available free of charge on the SEC website. You may also review or, for a fee, copy this filing at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Additional information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy at 800/SEC-0330. Additionally, the list of portfolio holdings is available by calling AFS.
This report is for the information of shareholders of Fundamental Investors, but it also may be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus or summary prospectus, which gives details about charges, expenses, investment objectives and operating policies of the fund. If used as sales material after March 31, 2012, this report must be accompanied by an American Funds statistical update for the most recently completed calendar quarter.
The American Funds difference
Since 1931, American Funds has helped investors pursue long-term investment success. Our consistent approach — in combination with a proven system — has resulted in a superior long-term track record.
Consistent approach
We base our decisions on a long-term perspective because we believe it is the best way to achieve superior long-term investment results. Our portfolio counselors average 25 years of investment experience, including 21 years at our company, reflecting a career commitment to our long-term approach.1
Proven system
Our system combines individual accountability with teamwork. Each fund is divided into portions that are managed by investment professionals with varied backgrounds, ages and investment styles. An extensive global research effort is the backbone of our system.
Superior long-term track record
Our equity funds have beaten their Lipper peer indexes in 91% of 10-year periods and 96% of 20-year periods. Our fixed-income funds have beaten their Lipper indexes in 60% of 10-year periods and 67% of 20-year periods.2 Our fund management fees have generally been among the lowest in the industry.3
| 2 Based on Class A share results for periods through 12/31/11. Periods covered are the shorter of the fund’s lifetime or since the comparable Lipper index inception date. |
| 3 Based on management fees for the 20-year period ended 12/31/11 versus comparable Lipper categories, excluding funds of funds. |
American Funds span a range of investment objectives
| Emphasis on long-term growth through stocks |
| The Growth Fund of America® |
| Emphasis on long-term growth and dividends through stocks |
| Capital World Growth and Income Fund® |
| International Growth and Income FundSM |
| The Investment Company of America® |
| Washington Mutual Investors FundSM |
| Emphasis on above-average income and growth through stocks and/or bonds |
| The Income Fund of America® |
| Emphasis on long-term growth and current income through stocks and bonds |
| American Funds Global Balanced FundSM |
| Emphasis on current income through bonds |
| American Funds Mortgage Fund® |
| American High-Income TrustSM |
| The Bond Fund of AmericaSM |
| Intermediate Bond Fund of America® |
| Short-Term Bond Fund of AmericaSM |
| U.S. Government Securities FundSM |
| Emphasis on tax-exempt current income through municipal bonds |
| American Funds Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond FundSM |
| American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund® |
| Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of AmericaSM |
| The Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America® |
| State-specific tax-exempt funds |
| American Funds Tax-Exempt Fund of New YorkSM |
| The Tax-Exempt Fund of California® |
| The Tax-Exempt Fund of Maryland® |
| The Tax-Exempt Fund of Virginia® |
| American Funds Money Market Fund® |
| •American Funds Target Date Retirement Series® |
The Capital Group Companies
American Funds Capital Research and Management Capital International Capital Guardian Capital Bank and Trust
Lit. No. MFGEAR-910-0212P
Litho in USA KBDA/Q/8056-S28695
Printed on paper containing 10% post-consumer waste
Printed with inks containing soy and/or vegetable oil
ITEM 2 – Code of Ethics