The right choice for the long term®
Fundamental Investors
[close-up photo of water running over rocks in a stream]
A consistent approach amid changing markets
Annual report for the year ended December 31, 2009
Fundamental InvestorsSM seeks long-term growth of capital and income primarily through investments in common stocks.
This fund is one of the 30 American Funds. American Funds is one of the nation’s largest mutual fund families. For nearly 80 years, Capital Research and Management Company,SM the American Funds adviser, has invested with a long-term focus based on thorough research and attention to risk.
Fund results shown in this report, unless otherwise indicated, are for Class A shares at net asset value. If a sales charge (maximum 5.75%) had been deducted, the results would have been lower. Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. Investing for short periods makes losses more likely. Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Investment results assume all distributions are reinvested and reflect applicable fees and expenses. The fund’s investment adviser waived a portion of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through December 31, 2008. Fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. See the Financial Highlights table on pages 26 and 27 for details.
The fund’s 30-day yield for Class A shares as of January 31, 2010, calculated in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission formula, was 1.38%. The fund’s distribution rate for Class A shares as of that date was 1.44%. Both reflect the 5.75% maximum sales charge. The SEC yield reflects the rate at which the fund is earning income on its current portfolio of securities while the distribution rate reflects the fund’s past dividends paid to shareholders. Accordingly, the fund’s SEC yield and distribution rate may differ.
Results for other share classes can be found on page 29.
Equity investments are subject to market fluctuations. Investing outside the United States involves additional risks, such as currency fluctuations, periods of illiquidity and price volatility, as more fully described in the prospectus. These risks may be heightened in connection with investments in developing countries. See the prospectus and the Risk Factors section of this report for more information on these and other risks associated with investing in the fund.
Fellow shareholders:
[close-up photo of water running over rocks in a stream]
During its recently concluded fiscal year, Fundamental Investors overcame the extremely difficult economic and market conditions that marked the beginning of the period to post a sizable gain. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2009, the fund rose 33.4% for shareholders who reinvested quarterly dividends totaling 48 cents a share.
The fund’s results topped the 26.5% gain of its primary benchmark, the unmanaged Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index, a broad measure of U.S. stocks. In addition, the fund’s results surpassed those of its peer group as measured by the Lipper Growth and Income Funds Index, which advanced 29.1%.
Fundamental Investors also registered a larger increase than the MSCI World Index, a measure of stocks in 23 developed nations, which climbed 30.8%. While this is not one of the fund’s key benchmark indexes, because Fundamental Investors is able to invest up to 30% of its assets outside the United States and Canada, we think it provides context on the broader global market environment.
As most fund shareholders invest for long-term objectives, we encourage you to take a long-term perspective on evaluating fund results. As you can see in the table below, Fundamental Investors has posted higher returns than its key benchmarks for all the time periods shown.
[Begin Sidebar]
Results at a glance | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For periods ended December 31, 2009, with all distributions reinvested | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total returns | | | Average annual returns | |
| | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | 10 years | | | Lifetime1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fundamental Investors | | | 33.4 | % | | | 4.0 | % | | | 3.6 | % | | | 12.5 | % |
(Class A shares) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Standard & Poor’s | | | 26.5 | | | | 0.4 | | | | –0.9 | | | | 11.2 | |
500 Composite Index2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lipper Growth and | | | 29.1 | | | | 0.8 | | | | 1.2 | | | | 10.6 | |
Income Funds Index3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MSCI World Index2 | | | 30.8 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 10.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Since Capital Research and Management Company began managing the fund on August 1, 1978. | | | | | | | | | |
2 The indexes are unmanaged and their results do not reflect the effect of sales charges, commissions or expenses. | | | | | |
3 The Lipper index does not reflect the effect of sales charges. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In this report | |
| |
| Special feature |
| |
6 | A consistent approach amid changing markets |
| |
| How research, a value orientation and a long-term perspective help the fund navigate diverse |
| investment climates. |
| |
| Contents |
| |
1 | Letter to shareholders |
| |
4 | Results of a $10,000 investment in Fundamental Investors |
| |
12 | Summary investment portfolio |
| |
16 | Financial statements |
| |
35 | Board of directors and other officers |
Maintaining the dividend
We were pleased to be able to hold the line on the fund’s dividend amid a very challenging climate in which many historically high yielding areas of the market, included but not limited to financial companies, markedly reduced or eliminated their payouts.
Surging returns follow slow start
The 12 months ended December 31, 2009 began in the throes of a deeply uncertain financial and market environment in which a full-scale global economic collapse seemed a real possibility. Investors faced a rising tide of bad news as trade fell, industrial production and consumer spending flagged, GDP contracted and unemployment rose.
In March however, investors returned to the market, lured by low valuations and an increasing belief that the coordinated global efforts of central bankers and governments had warded off financial calamity. They ignited a run-up that saw the S&P 500 rise a total of more than 30% during the second and third quarters. A combination of low interest rates and slightly improving economic indicators helped sustain the rally through the end of the year.
The U.S. dollar weakened against all major currencies except the Japanese yen. This helped boost returns for most of the fund’s investments in companies headquartered beyond our shores. As of year-end, 23% of fund assets were invested in companies located abroad, a figure virtually unchanged from the end of 2008.
China takes up the slack
Fund results were bolstered by rising stock prices in several areas that have been meaningful contributors in recent years. Specifically, energy, metals and mining, and chemical companies notched very strong returns.
Many of these companies had suffered mightily in 2008, when the global economic slowdown caused significant demand contraction. But in the throes of the downturn, many countries in the developing world, principally China, drew on sizable reserves and initiated projects to stimulate economies. The resulting increase in demand for energy and materials helped offset sagging consumption in the developed world, and stock prices rallied.
Among energy companies, Suncor, the fund’s largest holding, gained 86.4%, while Tenaris (103.3%), Petrobras (94.7%), Diamond Offshore Drilling (67.0%) and Occidental Petroleum (35.6%) also surged.
Mining companies Rio Tinto (146.3%), Xstrata (87.0%) and BHP Billiton (78.2%) were major contributors. The steep run-up in many metals and mining holdings presented an opportunity to trim some positions and realize the profits, which we did.
Among chemical stocks, DuPont gained 33.1%, but the highest returns came from companies more tightly focused on agriculture. These included fertilizer producers Mosaic (72.6%) and Potash (48.2%), and seed manufacturer Syngenta (45.4%).
Widespread portfolio strength
Beyond these areas, broad market strength translated into widespread portfolio strength, as over 80% of the companies held for the full 12 months notched price gains.
The fund’s 10 largest positions, which reflect the diversity of the broader portfolio, all finished in positive territory. In addition to Suncor, Microsoft (56.8%), Cisco Systems (46.9%), Medtronic (40.0%), Oracle (38.4%), JPMorgan Chase (32.2%), Coca-Cola (25.9%) and Merck (20.2%) all turned in sizable increases. Roche (11.1%) recorded a more modest gain while McDonald’s (0.4%) finished with only a slight uptick.
Among larger holdings that detracted from results were Citigroup (–50.7%), Eli Lilly (–11.3%) and General Electric (–6.6%).
[Begin Sidebar]
Fundamental Investors’ total return year by year (ending December 31) | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Capital return | | | Income return | | | Total return | |
| | | | | | | | | |
2000 | | | 3.1 | % | | | 1.2 | % | | | 4.3 | % |
2001 | | | –10.9 | | | | 1.3 | | | | –9.6 | |
2002 | | | –19.1 | | | | 1.8 | | | | –17.3 | |
2003 | | | 30.2 | | | | 1.8 | | | | 32.0 | |
2004 | | | 11.9 | | | | 2.0 | | | | 13.9 | |
2005 | | | 9.9 | | | | 1.8 | | | | 11.7 | |
2006 | | | 17.6 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 19.2 | |
2007 | | | 11.2 | | | | 2.4 | | | | 13.6 | |
2008 | | | –41.1 | | | | 1.4 | | | | –39.7 | |
2009 | | | 31.5 | | | | 1.9 | | | | 33.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
10-year average annual total return | | | | | | | | | | | 3.6 | % |
10-year cumulative total return | | | | | | | | | | | 42.5 | |
Lifetime cumulative total return (since 8/1/78) | | | | | | | | | | | 3,922.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return measures both capital results (changes in net asset value) and income return (from dividends). | | | | | |
All returns assume reinvestment of all dividends and capital gain distributions. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
[End Sidebar]
Despite strong results, uncertainty
To some degree, the robust results of the past year do not speak to the level of turbulence and uncertainty that remains in the market. Our hope, of course, is for a sustained recovery, and we are keeping a close eye on economic indicators such as consumer spending and capital investment which help us gauge its strength.
We believe the fund’s portfolio is well positioned to benefit should the global economy mount a comeback. Yet we do not build a one-dimensional portfolio designed to thrive only in certain market conditions. Instead, as we discuss in the feature article that begins on page 6, we conduct thorough research in order to identify companies that we believe can do well over extended periods of time amid a variety of market environments.
We thank you for your commitment to long-term investing.
Sincerely,
/s/ James F. Rothenberg
James F. Rothenberg
Vice Chairman
/s/ Dina N. Perry
Dina N. Perry
President
February 8, 2010
Results of a $10,000 investment in Fundamental Investors
How a $10,000 investment has grown
The chart and the table below it illustrate how a $10,000 investment in the fund grew between August 1, 1978 — when Capital Research and Management Company became Fundamental Investors’ investment adviser — and December 31, 2009. The chart also shows how Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index and the Lipper Growth and Income Funds Index fared over this same period, and what happened to inflation (as measured by the Consumer Price Index).
Average annual total returns based on a $1,000 investment (for periods ended December 31, 2009)* | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | 10 years | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Class A shares | | | 25.71 | % | | | 2.77 | % | | | 2.99 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
*Assumes reinvestment of all distributions and payment of the maximum 5.75% sales charge. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The total annual fund operating expense ratio was 0.69% for Class A shares as of December 31, 2009.
Investment results assume all distributions are reinvested and reflect applicable fees and expenses. The fund’s investment adviser waived a portion of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through December 31, 2008. Fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. See the Financial Highlights table on pages 26 and 27 for details.
Fund results shown are for Class A shares and reflect deduction of the maximum sales charge of 5.75% on the $10,000 investment.1 Thus, the net amount invested was $9,425.2 Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
[begin mountain chart]
| | | | | Fundamental Investors with dividends reinvested1,3 | | | Fundamental Investors not including dividends1,6 | | | | | S&P 500 with dividends reinvested4 | | | | | Lipper Growth and Income Funds Index with dividends reinvested5 | | | | | Consumer Price Index (inflation)7 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Initial Investment | 7/31/1978 | | $ | 9,425 | | | $ | 9,425 | | | | | $ | 10,000 | | | | | $ | 10,000 | | | | | $ | 10,000 | |
| 1978 | 8 | High | 11-Sep-78 | | | 10,000 | | | | 9,919 | | High | 12-Sep-78 | | | 10,670 | | High | 31-Aug-78 | | | 10,369 | | Low | 31-Jul-78 | | | 10,000 | |
| | | Low | 14-Nov-78 | | | 8,667 | | | | 8,596 | | Low | 14-Nov-78 | | | 9,306 | | Low | 31-Oct-78 | | | 9,237 | | High | 29-Dec-78 | | | 10,304 | |
| | | Close | 29-Dec-78 | | | 9,155 | | | | 8,947 | | Close | 29-Dec-78 | | | 9,762 | | Close | 29-Dec-78 | | | 9,684 | | Close | 29-Dec-78 | | | 10,304 | |
| 1979 | | Low | 27-Feb-79 | | | 9,086 | | | | 8,880 | | Low | 27-Feb-79 | | | 9,807 | | Low | 28-Feb-79 | | | 9,822 | | Low | 31-Jan-79 | | | 10,396 | |
| | | High | 5-Oct-79 | | | 10,823 | | | | 10,310 | | High | 5-Oct-79 | | | 11,769 | | High | 31-Dec-79 | | | 11,995 | | High | 31-Dec-79 | | | 11,674 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-79 | | | 10,556 | | | | 9,892 | | Close | 31-Dec-79 | | | 11,579 | | Close | 31-Dec-79 | | | 11,995 | | Close | 31-Dec-79 | | | 11,674 | |
| 1980 | | Low | 21-Apr-80 | | | 9,625 | | | | 8,907 | | Low | 27-Mar-80 | | | 10,627 | | Low | 31-Mar-80 | | | 11,317 | | Low | 31-Jan-80 | | | 11,842 | |
| | | High | 20-Nov-80 | | | 13,131 | | | | 11,876 | | High | 28-Nov-80 | | | 15,813 | | High | 30-Nov-80 | | | 15,695 | | High | 31-Dec-80 | | | 13,135 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-80 | | | 12,807 | | | | 11,390 | | Close | 31-Dec-80 | | | 15,336 | | Close | 31-Dec-80 | | | 15,386 | | Close | 31-Dec-80 | | | 13,135 | |
| 1981 | | High | 27-Apr-81 | | | 13,986 | | | | 12,308 | | High | 6-Jan-81 | | | 15,603 | | High | 31-May-81 | | | 15,965 | | Low | 31-Jan-81 | | | 13,242 | |
| | | Low | 25-Sep-81 | | | 11,906 | | | | 10,243 | | Low | 25-Sep-81 | | | 13,172 | | Low | 30-Sep-81 | | | 14,172 | | High | 31-Dec-81 | | | 14,307 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-81 | | | 12,654 | | | | 10,688 | | Close | 31-Dec-81 | | | 14,581 | | Close | 31-Dec-81 | | | 15,172 | | Close | 31-Dec-81 | | | 14,307 | |
| 1982 | | Low | 22-Jan-82 | | | 10,593 | | | | 8,947 | | Low | 12-Aug-82 | | | 12,625 | | Low | 31-Jul-82 | | | 14,274 | | Low | 31-Jan-82 | | | 14,353 | |
| | | High | 7-Dec-82 | | | 17,346 | | | | 13,833 | | High | 9-Nov-82 | | | 17,877 | | High | 31-Dec-82 | | | 18,839 | | High | 31-Oct-82 | | | 14,947 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-82 | | | 16,957 | | | | 13,522 | | Close | 31-Dec-82 | | | 17,723 | | Close | 31-Dec-82 | | | 18,839 | | Close | 31-Dec-82 | | | 14,855 | |
| 1983 | | Low | 3-Jan-83 | | | 16,636 | | | | 13,266 | | Low | 3-Jan-83 | | | 17,433 | | Low | 31-Jan-83 | | | 19,378 | | Low | 31-Jan-83 | | | 14,886 | |
| | | High | 10-Oct-83 | | | 21,599 | | | | 16,721 | | High | 10-Oct-83 | | | 22,491 | | High | 30-Nov-83 | | | 23,277 | | High | 30-Dec-83 | | | 15,419 | |
| | | Close | 30-Dec-83 | | | 21,389 | | | | 16,424 | | Close | 30-Dec-83 | | | 21,721 | | Close | 30-Dec-83 | | | 23,127 | | Close | 30-Dec-83 | | | 15,419 | |
| 1984 | | High | 9-Jan-84 | | | 22,004 | | | | 16,896 | | Low | 24-Jul-84 | | | 19,933 | | Low | 31-May-84 | | | 21,038 | | Low | 31-Jan-84 | | | 15,510 | |
| | | Low | 24-Jul-84 | | | 18,549 | | | | 13,980 | | High | 6-Nov-84 | | | 23,337 | | High | 31-Dec-84 | | | 24,119 | | High | 31-Oct-84 | | | 16,027 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-84 | | | 22,621 | | | | 16,759 | | Close | 31-Dec-84 | | | 23,083 | | Close | 31-Dec-84 | | | 24,119 | | Close | 31-Dec-84 | | | 16,027 | |
| 1985 | | Low | 1-May-85 | | | 22,882 | | | | 16,819 | | Low | 4-Jan-85 | | | 22,592 | | Low | 31-Jan-85 | | | 25,851 | | Low | 31-Jan-85 | | | 16,058 | |
| | | High | 16-Dec-85 | | | 29,736 | | | | 21,355 | | High | 16-Dec-85 | | | 30,417 | | High | 31-Dec-85 | | | 31,006 | | High | 31-Dec-85 | | | 16,636 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-85 | | | 29,448 | | | | 21,148 | | Close | 31-Dec-85 | | | 30,407 | | Close | 31-Dec-85 | | | 31,006 | | Close | 31-Dec-85 | | | 16,636 | |
| 1986 | | Low | 14-Feb-86 | | | 31,766 | | | | 22,665 | | Low | 22-Jan-86 | | | 29,286 | | Low | 31-Jan-86 | | | 31,537 | | Low | 30-Apr-86 | | | 16,530 | |
| | | High | 4-Sep-86 | | | 36,571 | | | | 25,757 | | High | 2-Dec-86 | | | 37,737 | | High | 31-Aug-86 | | | 37,352 | | High | 31-Dec-86 | | | 16,819 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-86 | | | 35,941 | | | | 25,151 | | Close | 31-Dec-86 | | | 36,082 | | Close | 31-Dec-86 | | | 36,472 | | Close | 31-Dec-86 | | | 16,819 | |
| 1987 | | High | 25-Aug-87 | | | 50,132 | | | | 34,478 | | High | 25-Aug-87 | | | 51,060 | | High | 31-Aug-87 | | | 47,533 | | Low | 31-Jan-87 | | | 16,925 | |
| | | Low | 4-Dec-87 | | | 33,691 | | | | 23,002 | | Low | 4-Dec-87 | | | 34,314 | | Low | 30-Nov-87 | | | 35,112 | | High | 30-Nov-87 | | | 17,565 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-87 | | | 37,295 | | | | 25,463 | | Close | 31-Dec-87 | | | 37,977 | | Close | 31-Dec-87 | | | 37,434 | | Close | 31-Dec-87 | | | 17,565 | |
| 1988 | | Low | 20-Jan-88 | | | 36,464 | | | | 24,895 | | Low | 20-Jan-88 | | | 37,293 | | Low | 31-Jan-88 | | | 39,236 | | Low | 31-Jan-88 | | | 17,610 | |
| | | High | 5-Jul-88 | | | 43,076 | | | | 28,988 | | High | 21-Oct-88 | | | 44,800 | | High | 30-Dec-88 | | | 44,304 | | High | 30-Dec-88 | | | 18,341 | |
| | | Close | 30-Dec-88 | | | 43,246 | | | | 28,561 | | Close | 30-Dec-88 | | | 44,267 | | Close | 30-Dec-88 | | | 44,304 | | Close | 30-Dec-88 | | | 18,341 | |
| 1989 | | Low | 3-Jan-89 | | | 43,068 | | | | 28,443 | | Low | 3-Jan-89 | | | 43,883 | | Low | 28-Feb-89 | | | 46,392 | | Low | 31-Jan-89 | | | 18,432 | |
| | | High | 9-Oct-89 | | | 58,786 | | | | 38,138 | | High | 9-Oct-89 | | | 58,837 | | High | 31-Aug-89 | | | 55,358 | | High | 29-Dec-89 | | | 19,193 | |
| | | Close | 29-Dec-89 | | | 55,597 | | | | 35,438 | | Close | 29-Dec-89 | | | 58,269 | | Close | 29-Dec-89 | | | 54,819 | | Close | 29-Dec-89 | | | 19,193 | |
| 1990 | | High | 4-Jun-90 | | | 60,265 | | | | 37,947 | | High | 16-Jul-90 | | | 61,897 | | High | 31-May-90 | | | 55,785 | | Low | 31-Jan-90 | | | 19,391 | |
| | | Low | 11-Oct-90 | | | 46,988 | | | | 29,390 | | Low | 11-Oct-90 | | | 50,026 | | Low | 31-Oct-90 | | | 47,212 | | High | 30-Nov-90 | | | 20,365 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-90 | | | 52,130 | | | | 32,180 | | Close | 31-Dec-90 | | | 56,457 | | Close | 31-Dec-90 | | | 51,534 | | Close | 31-Dec-90 | | | 20,365 | |
| 1991 | | Low | 9-Jan-91 | | | 50,201 | | | | 30,989 | | Low | 9-Jan-91 | | | 53,255 | | Low | 31-Jan-91 | | | 54,196 | | Low | 31-Jan-91 | | | 20,487 | |
| | | High | 31-Dec-91 | | | 67,947 | | | | 40,940 | | High | 31-Dec-91 | | | 73,620 | | High | 31-Dec-91 | | | 65,836 | | High | 31-Dec-91 | | | 20,989 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-91 | | | 67,947 | | | | 40,940 | | Close | 31-Dec-91 | | | 73,620 | | Close | 31-Dec-91 | | | 65,836 | | Close | 31-Dec-91 | | | 20,989 | |
| 1992 | | Low | 8-Apr-92 | | | 66,472 | | | | 39,828 | | Low | 8-Apr-92 | | | 70,130 | | Low | 31-Jan-92 | | | 65,763 | | Low | 31-Jan-92 | | | 21,020 | |
| | | High | 12-Nov-92 | | | 72,487 | | | | 42,938 | | High | 18-Dec-92 | | | 80,063 | | High | 31-Dec-92 | | | 72,177 | | High | 30-Nov-92 | | | 21,613 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-92 | | | 74,871 | | | | 44,059 | | Close | 31-Dec-92 | | | 79,222 | | Close | 31-Dec-92 | | | 72,177 | | Close | 31-Dec-92 | | | 21,598 | |
| 1993 | | Low | 8-Jan-93 | | | 74,615 | | | | 43,908 | | Low | 8-Jan-93 | | | 78,011 | | Low | 31-Jan-93 | | | 73,298 | | Low | 31-Jan-93 | | | 21,705 | |
| | | High | 2-Nov-93 | | | 88,379 | | | | 51,169 | | High | 28-Dec-93 | | | 87,854 | | High | 31-Dec-93 | | | 82,730 | | High | 30-Nov-93 | | | 22,192 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-93 | | | 88,466 | | | | 50,884 | | Close | 31-Dec-93 | | | 87,189 | | Close | 31-Dec-93 | | | 82,730 | | Close | 31-Dec-93 | | | 22,192 | |
| 1994 | | High | 2-Feb-94 | | | 91,634 | | | | 52,706 | | High | 2-Feb-94 | | | 90,223 | | Low | 20-Apr-94 | | | 79,545 | | Low | 31-Jan-94 | | | 22,253 | |
| | | Low | 8-Dec-94 | | | 86,773 | | | | 48,708 | | Low | 4-Apr-94 | | | 82,600 | | High | 31-Aug-94 | | | 85,813 | | High | 30-Nov-94 | | | 22,785 | |
| | | Close | 30-Dec-94 | | | 89,641 | | | | 50,319 | | Close | 30-Dec-94 | | | 88,336 | | Close | 30-Dec-94 | | | 82,387 | | Close | 30-Dec-94 | | | 22,785 | |
| 1995 | | Low | 3-Jan-95 | | | 89,539 | | | | 50,261 | | Low | 3-Jan-95 | | | 88,305 | | Low | 3-Jan-95 | | | 82,387 | | Low | 31-Jan-95 | | | 22,877 | |
| | | High | 29-Nov-95 | | | 119,498 | | | | 66,056 | | High | 13-Dec-95 | | | 122,408 | | High | 6-Dec-95 | | | 108,087 | | High | 31-Oct-95 | | | 23,394 | |
| | | Close | 29-Dec-95 | | | 120,306 | | | | 66,210 | | Close | 29-Dec-95 | | | 121,491 | | Close | 29-Dec-95 | | | 108,042 | | Close | 29-Dec-95 | | | 23,364 | |
| 1996 | | Low | 10-Jan-96 | | | 117,715 | | | | 64,784 | | Low | 10-Jan-96 | | | 118,049 | | Low | 10-Jan-96 | | | 105,553 | | Low | 31-Jan-96 | | | 23,501 | |
| | | High | 26-Nov-96 | | | 145,602 | | | | 79,119 | | High | 25-Nov-96 | | | 152,084 | | High | 27-Dec-96 | | | 131,831 | | High | 30-Nov-96 | | | 24,140 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-96 | | | 144,352 | | | | 78,143 | | Close | 31-Dec-96 | | | 149,367 | | Close | 31-Dec-96 | | | 130,379 | | Close | 31-Dec-96 | | | 24,140 | |
| 1997 | | Low | 11-Apr-97 | | | 144,443 | | | | 77,891 | | Low | 2-Jan-97 | | | 148,615 | | Low | 2-Jan-97 | | | 129,511 | | Low | 31-Jan-97 | | | 24,216 | |
| | | High | 7-Oct-97 | | | 189,427 | | | | 101,423 | | High | 5-Dec-97 | | | 201,641 | | High | 8-Oct-97 | | | 167,437 | | High | 31-Oct-97 | | | 24,597 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-97 | | | 182,855 | | | | 97,513 | | Close | 31-Dec-97 | | | 199,183 | | Close | 31-Dec-97 | | | 165,420 | | Close | 31-Dec-97 | | | 24,551 | |
| 1998 | | High | 17-Jul-98 | | | 212,584 | | | | 112,606 | | Low | 9-Jan-98 | | | 190,410 | | High | 17-Jul-98 | | | 190,194 | | Low | 31-Jan-98 | | | 24,597 | |
| | | Low | 8-Oct-98 | | | 173,534 | | | | 91,600 | | High | 29-Dec-98 | | | 258,425 | | Low | 8-Oct-98 | | | 152,689 | | High | 31-Oct-98 | | | 24,962 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-98 | | | 213,421 | | | | 112,292 | | Close | 31-Dec-98 | | | 256,100 | | Close | 31-Dec-98 | | | 187,884 | | Close | 31-Dec-98 | | | 24,947 | |
| 1999 | | Low | 14-Jan-99 | | | 211,060 | | | | 111,050 | | Low | 14-Jan-99 | | | 252,550 | | Low | 17-Feb-99 | | | 183,318 | | Low | 31-Jan-99 | | | 25,008 | |
| | | High | 10-Dec-99 | | | 258,554 | | | | 134,742 | | High | 31-Dec-99 | | | 309,980 | | High | 16-Jul-99 | | | 214,455 | | High | 30-Nov-99 | | | 25,616 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-99 | | | 265,882 | | | | 138,151 | | Close | 31-Dec-99 | | | 309,980 | | Close | 31-Dec-99 | | | 210,168 | | Close | 31-Dec-99 | | | 25,616 | |
| 2000 | | High | 1-Sep-00 | | | 293,957 | | | | 151,363 | | High | 24-Mar-00 | | | 322,882 | | Low | 25-Feb-00 | | | 191,317 | | Low | 31-Jan-00 | | | 25,693 | |
| | | Low | 21-Dec-00 | | | 266,380 | | | | 136,743 | | Low | 20-Dec-00 | | | 269,684 | | High | 1-Sep-00 | | | 221,351 | | High | 30-Nov-00 | | | 26,499 | |
| | | Close | 29-Dec-00 | | | 277,235 | | | | 142,315 | | Close | 29-Dec-00 | | | 281,766 | | Close | 29-Dec-00 | | | 210,997 | | Close | 29-Dec-00 | | | 26,484 | |
| 2001 | | High | 1-Feb-01 | | | 287,822 | | | | 147,750 | | High | 30-Jan-01 | | | 293,173 | | High | 21-May-01 | | | 216,930 | | Low | 31-Jan-01 | | | 26,651 | |
| | | Low | 21-Sep-01 | | | 211,970 | | | | 107,718 | | Low | 21-Sep-01 | | | 207,919 | | Low | 21-Sep-01 | | | 166,373 | | High | 30-Sep-01 | | | 27,139 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-01 | | | 250,761 | | | | 126,959 | | Close | 31-Dec-01 | | | 248,303 | | Close | 31-Dec-01 | | | 195,336 | | Close | 31-Dec-01 | | | 26,895 | |
| 2002 | | High | 19-Mar-02 | | | 260,698 | | | | 131,491 | | High | 4-Jan-02 | | | 253,587 | | High | 19-Mar-02 | | | 201,690 | | Low | 31-Jan-02 | | | 26,956 | |
| | | Low | 9-Oct-02 | | | 182,355 | | | | 91,253 | | Low | 9-Oct-02 | | | 169,983 | | Low | 9-Oct-02 | | | 140,313 | | High | 31-Oct-02 | | | 27,595 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-02 | | | 207,271 | | | | 102,816 | | Close | 31-Dec-02 | | | 193,447 | | Close | 31-Dec-02 | | | 160,381 | | Close | 31-Dec-02 | | | 27,534 | |
| 2003 | | Low | 12-Mar-03 | | | 186,058 | | | | 91,854 | | Low | 11-Mar-03 | | | 176,642 | | Low | 11-Mar-03 | | | 145,989 | | Low | 31-Jan-03 | | | 27,656 | |
| | | High | 31-Dec-03 | | | 273,523 | | | | 133,434 | | High | 31-Dec-03 | | | 248,903 | | High | 31-Dec-03 | | | 204,175 | | High | 30-Sep-03 | | | 28,189 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-03 | | | 273,523 | | | | 133,434 | | Close | 31-Dec-03 | | | 248,903 | | Close | 31-Dec-03 | | | 204,175 | | Close | 31-Dec-03 | | | 28,052 | |
| 2004 | | Low | 17-May-04 | | | 264,555 | | | | 128,624 | | Low | 12-Aug-04 | | | 240,252 | | Low | 12-Aug-04 | | | 199,152 | | Low | 31-Jan-04 | | | 28,189 | |
| | | High | 30-Dec-04 | | | 311,756 | | | | 149,252 | | High | 30-Dec-04 | | | 275,924 | | High | 30-Dec-04 | | | 228,446 | | High | 30-Nov-04 | | | 29,072 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-04 | | | 311,563 | | | | 149,159 | | Close | 31-Dec-04 | | | 275,970 | | Close | 31-Dec-04 | | | 228,113 | | Close | 31-Dec-04 | | | 28,965 | |
| 2005 | | Low | 28-Apr-05 | | | 297,315 | | | | 141,898 | | Low | 20-Apr-05 | | | 260,187 | | Low | 20-Apr-05 | | | 218,372 | | Low | 31-Jan-05 | | | 29,026 | |
| | | High | 14-Dec-05 | | | 352,458 | | | | 167,197 | | High | 14-Dec-05 | | | 294,796 | | High | 14-Dec-05 | | | 246,907 | | High | 31-Oct-05 | | | 30,320 | |
| | | Close | 30-Dec-05 | | | 347,960 | | | | 163,728 | | Close | 30-Dec-05 | | | 289,511 | | Close | 30-Dec-05 | | | 243,681 | | Close | 30-Dec-05 | | | 29,954 | |
| 2006 | | Low | 13-Jun-06 | | | 354,244 | | | | 165,717 | | Low | 13-Jun-06 | | | 286,100 | | Low | 13-Jun-06 | | | 242,646 | | Low | 31-Jan-06 | | | 30,183 | |
| | | High | 14-Dec-06 | | | 416,828 | | | | 194,392 | | High | 15-Dec-06 | | | 336,807 | | High | 15-Dec-06 | | | 283,196 | | High | 31-Aug-06 | | | 31,035 | |
| | | Close | 29-Dec-06 | | | 414,904 | | | | 192,480 | | Close | 29-Dec-06 | | | 335,199 | | Close | 29-Dec-06 | | | 281,615 | | Close | 29-Dec-06 | | | 30,715 | |
| 2007 | | Low | 5-Mar-07 | | | 406,016 | | | | 187,812 | | Low | 5-Mar-07 | | | 325,873 | | Low | 5-Mar-07 | | | 275,075 | | Low | 31-Jan-07 | | | 30,809 | |
| | | High | 31-Oct-07 | | | 490,222 | | | | 225,499 | | High | 9-Oct-07 | | | 374,990 | | High | 13-Jul-07 | | | 312,492 | | High | 30-Nov-07 | | | 31,990 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-07 | | | 471,134 | | | | 213,905 | | Close | 31-Dec-07 | | | 353,601 | | Close | 31-Dec-07 | | | 293,656 | | Close | 31-Dec-07 | | | 31,969 | |
| 2008 | | Low | 20-Nov-08 | | | 236,224 | | | | 106,274 | | Low | 20-Nov-08 | | | 184,490 | | Low | 20-Nov-08 | | | 151,582 | | Low | 31-Dec-08 | | | 31,998 | |
| | | High | 19-May-08 | | | 477,753 | | | | 216,251 | | High | 2-Jan-08 | | | 348,496 | | High | 3-Jan-08 | | | 289,857 | | High | 31-Jul-08 | | | 33,480 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-08 | | | 284,112 | | | | 126,717 | | Close | 31-Dec-08 | | | 222,801 | | Close | 31-Dec-08 | | | 183,429 | | Close | 31-Dec-08 | | | 31,998 | |
| 2009 | | Low | 9-Mar-09 | | | 228,825 | | | | 101,506 | | Low | 9-Mar-09 | | | 167,859 | | Low | 9-Mar-09 | | | 139,956 | | Low | 31-Jan-09 | | | 32,137 | |
| | | High | 28-Dec-09 | | | 382,823 | | | | 167,756 | | High | 28-Dec-09 | | | 284,556 | | High | 28-Dec-09 | | | 238,932 | | High | 30-Nov-09 | | | 32,927 | |
| | | Close | 31-Dec-09 | | | 378,888 | | | | 166,031 | | Close | 31-Dec-09 | | | 281,781 | | Close | 31-Dec-09 | | | 236,804 | | Close | 31-Dec-09 | | | 32,869 | |
[end mountain chart]
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31 | | | 1978 | 8 | | | 1979 | | | | 1980 | | | | 1981 | | | | 1982 | | | | 1983 | | | | 1984 | | | | 1985 | |
Capital value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends in cash | | $ | 216 | | | | 405 | | | | 553 | | | | 580 | | | | 634 | | | | 594 | | | | 556 | | | | 582 | |
Value at year-end1 | | $ | 8,947 | | | | 9,892 | | | | 11,390 | | | | 10,688 | | | | 13,522 | | | | 16,424 | | | | 16,759 | | | | 21,148 | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends reinvested | | $ | 217 | | | | 421 | | | | 603 | | | | 665 | | | | 768 | | | | 755 | | | | 734 | | | | 795 | |
Value at year-end1 | | $ | 9,155 | | | | 10,556 | | | | 12,807 | | | | 12,654 | | | | 16,957 | | | | 21,389 | | | | 22,621 | | | | 29,448 | |
Total return | | | (8.4 | )% | | | 15.3 | | | | 21.3 | | | | (1.2 | ) | | | 34.0 | | | | 26.1 | | | | 5.8 | | | | 30.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31 | | | 1986 | | | | 1987 | | | | 1988 | | | | 1989 | | | | 1990 | | | | 1991 | | | | 1992 | | | | 1993 | |
Capital value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends in cash | | | 636 | | | | 717 | | | | 895 | | | | 1,225 | | | | 1,058 | | | | 904 | | | | 988 | | | | 1,084 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 25,151 | | | | 25,463 | | | | 28,561 | | | | 35,438 | | | | 32,180 | | | | 40,940 | | | | 44,059 | | | | 50,884 | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | 894 | | | | 1,034 | | | | 1,328 | | | | 1,877 | | | | 1,679 | | | | 1,478 | | | | 1,655 | | | | 1,858 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 35,941 | | | | 37,295 | | | | 43,246 | | | | 55,597 | | | | 52,130 | | | | 67,947 | | | | 74,871 | | | | 88,466 | |
Total return | | | 22.0 | | | | 3.8 | | | | 16.0 | | | | 28.6 | | | | (6.2 | ) | | | 30.3 | | | | 10.2 | | | | 18.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31 | | | 1994 | | | | 1995 | | | | 1996 | | | | 1997 | | | | 1998 | | | | 1999 | | | | 2000 | | | | 2001 | |
Capital value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends in cash | | | 1,238 | | | | 1,160 | | | | 1,196 | | | | 1,351 | | | | 1,428 | | | | 1,578 | | | | 1,716 | | | | 1,844 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 50,319 | | | | 66,210 | | | | 78,143 | | | | 97,513 | | | | 112,292 | | | | 138,151 | | | | 142,315 | | | | 126,959 | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | 2,171 | | | | 2,082 | | | | 2,187 | | | | 2,511 | | | | 2,691 | | | | 3,013 | | | | 3,319 | | | | 3,611 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 89,641 | | | | 120,306 | | | | 144,352 | | | | 182,855 | | | | 213,421 | | | | 265,882 | | | | 277,235 | | | | 250,761 | |
Total return | | | 1.3 | | | | 34.2 | | | | 20.0 | | | | 26.7 | | | | 16.7 | | | | 24.6 | | | | 4.3 | | | | (9.6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31 | | | 2002 | | | | 2003 | | | | 2004 | | | | 2005 | | | | 2006 | | | | 2007 | | | | 2008 | | | | 2009 | |
Capital value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends in cash | | | 2,289 | | | | 1,850 | | | | 2,590 | | | | 2,729 | | | | 2,590 | | | | 4,572 | | | | 2,938 | | | | 2,435 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 102,816 | | | | 133,434 | | | | 149,159 | | | | 163,728 | | | | 192,480 | | | | 213,905 | | | | 126,717 | | | | 166,031 | 6 |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | 4,553 | | | | 3,755 | | | | 5,345 | | | | 5,735 | | | | 5,534 | | | | 9,917 | | | | 6,506 | | | | 5,500 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 207,271 | | | | 273,523 | | | | 311,563 | | | | 347,960 | | | | 414,904 | | | | 471,134 | | | | 284,112 | | | | 378,888 | 3 |
Total return | | | (17.3 | ) | | | 32.0 | | | | 13.9 | | | | 11.7 | | | | 19.2 | | | | 13.6 | | | | (39.7 | ) | | | 33.4 | |
Average annual total return 12.3%1
| ¹As outlined in the prospectus, the sales charge is reduced for accounts of $25,000 or more and is eliminated for purchases of $1 million of more. There is no sales charge on dividends or capital gain distributions that are reinvested in additional shares. |
| ²The maximum initial sales charge was 8.50% prior to July 1, 1988. |
| ³Includes reinvested dividends of $85,192 and reinvested capital gain distributions of $170,881. |
| 4Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index is unmanaged, and includes reinvested distributions but does not reflect the effect of sales charges, commissions or expenses. |
| 5Results of the Lipper Growth and Income Funds Index reflect fund expenses but do not reflect any applicable front-end sales charges. If any applicable front-end sales charges were included, results of the index would be lower. |
| 6Includes reinvested capital gain distributions of $91,556 but does not reflect dividends of $45,132 taken in cash. |
| 7Computed from data supplied by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. |
| 8For the period August 1, 1978 (when Capital Research and Management Company became investment adviser), through December 31, 1978. |
The results shown are before taxes on fund distributions and sale of fund shares.
[photo of a stream - a forest in the background]
A consistent approach amid changing markets
In 2008, the S&P 500 Composite Index, a key barometer of U.S. stocks, was down 37%. In 2009, it leapt 26%. While the contrast is stark, it doesn’t fully speak to the highly volatile conditions that characterized the two-year stretch. Precipitous market drops were followed by a swift run-up; economic indicators swung wildly, valuations were elusive and uncertainty always seemed close at hand.
These conditions were extreme, but for the men and women who manage your fund, investing amid dynamic market environments is the norm. And given the fund’s growth and income objectives, it’s also a key challenge — one that necessitates charting a prudent course when stocks are skyrocketing and balancing caution with opportunism when markets are in retreat.
Such shifting conditions might seem to call for an ever-changing mix of strategies and tactics, but we have always believed that navigating varied market and economic environments actually requires a consistent approach. In the following pages, we take a closer look at some of the key principles we apply as we seek to meet Fundamental Investors’ objectives and the long-term investing goals of its shareholders.
Relying on research
“We faced extremely challenging economic and market conditions these last two years. But amid the volatility of 2008 and early 2009, as well as during the recent recovery, we have stayed true to our process and approach,” emphasizes Dina Perry, Fundamental Investors’ president and one of its portfolio counselors. “At the center of that process in any environment is fundamental research aimed at identifying companies we believe will reward investors over time.”
“If you were to look at how I allocated my time during the downturn of 2008 and early 2009, it wouldn’t have looked much different from how I have spent it during more bullish periods,” explains portfolio counselor Brady Enright. “I continued to make sure I was meeting with companies and working to understand them better. During that period I was particularly interested in whether a company’s management was strengthening its business or taking measures that might jeopardize its long-term value. In steadier markets, my research would be emphasizing other things. But research is the common denominator in all conditions.”
“We benefit from a vast global research organization,” says portfolio counselor Mike Kerr. “We have people on the ground all over the world. They are visiting companies, meeting with senior managers and gathering data. This is shared daily through the investment notes, conference calls and one-on-one conversations that are the lifeblood of our investment process.”
This kind of timely firsthand information proved highly important during the latest downturn, when many of the traditional methods used to value companies became elusive and unreliable.
“During relatively stable periods, investors have metrics like price-to-earnings ratios that help in evaluating both existing and potential investments,” explains Brady. “But when markets are in free-fall and the economy contracts very quickly, revenues and profits can evaporate, which makes it difficult to have faith in those metrics. An in-depth understanding of companies and, in many cases, longstanding relationships with their senior managers, helps us tune out the short-term market noise and allows us to make judgments on the real value of the investments we’ve made and those we’re considering.”
Providing the insight needed to act
Market downturns are perilous, but they also present opportunity for well-prepared investors.
“During difficult periods, it’s particularly beneficial to have done your homework up front so that you can take advantage of market dips,” explains media analyst Mark Casey. “And because of our significant research resources, we’re able to maintain detailed coverage on lots of companies and can act quickly when opportunities arise. This is important as, generally speaking, attractive companies aren’t undervalued for long periods of time.”
Software and computer hardware analyst Paul Benjamin continues, “In downturns, we may be transacting more frequently, but it’s not panic selling. Rather, it’s opportunistic selling: We’ll trim holdings in companies we like in order to invest in companies we love that may have come into attractive valuation ranges. We view it as an opportunity to upgrade the portfolio.”
[photo of water flowing over moss-covered rocks]
Staying focused on value
Research also plays a key role during rising market environments. “During the dot-com bubble, our research led us to conclude that certain areas of the market such as technology, media and telecom were significantly overvalued,” notes Dina. “Rather than getting caught up in that frenzy and investing in companies with very high valuations but little-to-no earnings, we focused on the merits of the underlying companies. Sticking to our value criteria meant we steered clear of many of the firms that suffered worst when the bubble burst.”
“In any environment, we continually ask ourselves, ‘Based on our research, is the stock price attractive given my level of conviction in the company?’” says energy analyst Frank Hu. “The reality is that even great companies are not always great investments. If we believe they are fully valued, their investment upside may be limited. So whether we’re choosing to make an initial investment or hold our ground, the price has to be right.”
“Importantly, being able to ground our decisions in research helps take some of the emotion out of the process. That’s critical because it’s easy, for example, to get attached to an investment that has done very well,” admits Mark. “Regularly revisiting the premise that sparked our investment helps us to determine whether we think a given holding remains attractive or if it might be time to trim or sell the position to invest in a higher conviction idea.”
A long-term approach
Of course the benefits of research can be mitigated during a broad market collapse like the one we recently experienced, when solid companies suffered alongside more troubled ones. But the fund’s long-term orientation helps investment professionals stay focused on the big picture.
“We believe buying and holding solid companies is the best formula for delivering on the fund’s growth and income objectives,” says Mark. “That’s why we seek out those firms we believe can weather some of the economic and market challenges that invariably arise.”
[Begin Sidebar]
An in-depth understanding of companies and, in many cases, longstanding relationships with their senior managers helps investment professionals tune out the short-term market noise and allows them to make judgments on the real value of the investments they’ve made and those they’re considering.
[End Sidebar]
Indeed, portfolio counselors and analysts describe a kind of symbiosis between the fund’s emphasis on research and its long-term orientation.
“When you know you’re expected to take a longer term view and, importantly, you are evaluated based on your results over the longer term, it reinforces your commitment to getting to know a company inside and out,” says Mike. “And if you’ve selected companies that present real value, chances are you’re going to hold them longer.”
“In addition, a long-term approach lessens the need to time the market, which is extremely difficult to do,” notes Brady. “Take this past year as an example. If I only planned on holding an investment for a short time, whether I invested last January versus whether I invested last March would have made a huge difference. But that difference is less pronounced if I intend to remain invested for three or four years.”
Nonetheless, the fund’s portfolio counselors recognize that a three-to-four-year time horizon means fund holdings will likely be exposed to the different phases of an economic cycle — the multi-year expansion-recession-recovery pattern that economies typically follow. Historically, certain types of companies do better during different phases of the cycle. For example, oil and gas companies would be expected to do well during the recovery and expansion phases when energy use is robust. Conversely, consumer staples companies, which sell products people need regardless of economic conditions, might hold up well during the recession phase.
[Begin Sidebar]
The best teacher | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Fundamental Investors’ five portfolio counselors average over 31 years of investment experience. As they pursue the fund’s growth-and-income objectives and seek to manage the risks inherent in investing, they draw on insights gained over a wide variety of market conditions. | |
| | | | | | |
Portfolio counselor | | Years of investment experience | | | Years with American Funds | |
| | | | | | |
Jim Drasdo | | | 38 | | | | 33 | |
Brady Enright | | | 18 | | | | 13 | |
Mike Kerr | | | 27 | | | | 25 | |
Ron Morrow | | | 42 | | | | 13 | |
Dina Perry | | | 32 | | | | 18 | |
[End Sidebar]
“We know that certain types of companies generally do better at different points in the cycle, and this influences when we invest in them as well as when we choose to sell them,” says Dina. “That being said, both market and economic cycles can be unpredictable so we try to seek out companies we believe can weather a variety of market conditions to produce a strong total return.”
A firm like Suncor Energy, for many years one of the fund’s largest holdings, helps illustrate the fund’s investment process. “As the economy fell into recession in 2008, energy stocks including Suncor declined sharply as the global economy contracted and oil prices plunged,” explains Frank. “Rather than selling when prices were low, we looked to our research which suggested that, in light of the long-term global supply and demand trends for oil, the market was pricing the company’s stock far below its value. As a result, we maintained our investment in Suncor.”
“During volatile periods, it’s hard not to think short term. But the culture of our investment organization continually reinforces the need to look out several years and see the big picture,” continues Frank. “During the past couple of years it’s a principle that was continually emphasized by my more experienced colleagues. It kept me focused on the next four years rather than the next four months.”
Flexible when necessary
“It’s important to note that we don’t hold for the long-term simply on principle. Rather, an investment professional will remain invested only if he or she believes that a given holding still provides opportunity to help meet the fund’s objectives,” explains Brady.
For example, sometimes an investment rises very quickly and reaches a price range that it had been expected to achieve only over a longer period of time. In those cases, investment professionals are often content to trim or sell the holding. The same holds true on the downside — sometimes portfolio counselors and analysts obtain new information that undermines their belief in the long-term value of an investment, and they sell before they had expected to.
Income: A consistent objective
As a growth-and-income fund, Fundamental Investors is committed to providing shareholders with regular quarterly income. To do so, the fund invests mostly in dividend-paying companies and does so whether or not dividends happen to be in fashion.
“The ability to pay a dividend may be a sign that a company has real earnings and also can serve as an indicator of its health and strength,” explains portfolio counselor Ron Morrow. “Moreover, an ongoing commitment to pay dividends can help ensure that company managers remain good stewards of cash.”
A portfolio filled with these types of companies not only offers the potential for added stability, it provides real return regardless of market conditions. This has historically made a significant contribution to an investor’s total return.
Interestingly, the fund’s unwavering focus on income played a significant role in helping it largely steer clear of the high-flying stocks that characterized the dot-com bubble, as most of those companies paid no dividends.
“Emphasizing dividends has been a key part of our approach to investing in all market conditions,” notes Dina. “Together with our long-term perspective, value orientation and focus on research, it has been instrumental in helping many Fundamental Investors’ shareholders reach their investing objectives.” n
[photo of moss-covered rocks in a stream]
Measuring results over meaningful periods of time
Funds with a history of weathering diverse economic and market conditions can help investors reach their long-term goals. Looking at results for 10-year periods, which generally encompass a variety of investment environments, is one way to evaluate a fund’s historical ability to meet those needs.
The table to the right shows annualized results for 22 different 10-year periods. As you can see, Fundamental Investors outpaced the unmanaged Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index in 17 of the 22 time frames shown. And in every period, the fund outpaced the Lipper Growth and Income Funds Index, a measure of its category peers.
It’s also interesting to note that, unlike the benchmarks, the fund delivered a positive average annual return during every period shown.
Fund results shown are for Class A shares at net asset value with all distributions reinvested. If a sales charge had been deducted, the results would have been lower. Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
| | Average annual total returns for | |
| 10-year periods ended December 31 |
| | Fundamental Investors | | | S&P 500 | | | Lipper Growth and Income Funds Index | |
| | | | | | | | | |
1988 | | | 16.8 | % | | | 16.3 | % | | | 16.4 | % |
1989 | | | 18.1 | | | | 17.5 | | | | 16.4 | |
1990 | | | 15.1 | | | | 13.9 | | | | 12.8 | |
1991 | | | 18.3 | | | | 17.6 | | | | 15.8 | |
1992 | | | 16.0 | | | | 16.2 | | | | 14.4 | |
1993 | | | 15.3 | | | | 14.9 | | | | 13.6 | |
1994 | | | 14.8 | | | | 14.4 | | | | 13.1 | |
1995 | | | 15.1 | | | | 14.9 | | | | 13.3 | |
1996 | | | 14.9 | | | | 15.3 | | | | 13.6 | |
1997 | | | 17.2 | | | | 18.0 | | | | 16.0 | |
1998 | | | 17.3 | | | | 19.2 | | | | 15.5 | |
1999 | | | 16.9 | | | | 18.2 | | | | 14.4 | |
2000 | | | 18.2 | | | | 17.4 | | | | 15.1 | |
2001 | | | 13.9 | | | | 12.9 | | | | 11.5 | |
2002 | | | 10.7 | | | | 9.3 | | | | 8.3 | |
2003 | | | 11.9 | | | | 11.1 | | | | 9.5 | |
2004 | | | 13.3 | | | | 12.1 | | | | 10.7 | |
2005 | | | 11.2 | | | | 9.1 | | | | 8.5 | |
2006 | | | 11.1 | | | | 8.4 | | | | 8.0 | |
2007 | | | 9.9 | | | | 5.9 | | | | 5.9 | |
2008 | | | 2.9 | | | | –1.4 | | | | –0.2 | |
2009 | | | 3.6 | | | | –0.9 | | | | 1.2 | |
[Begin Sidebar]
During volatile periods, it’s hard not to think short term. But the culture of the fund’s investment organization continually reinforces the need to look out several years and see the bigger picture.
[End Sidebar]
Approval of Investment Advisory and Service Agreement
The fund’s board has approved the fund’s Investment Advisory and Service Agreement (the “agreement”) with Capital Research and Management Company (“CRMC”) for an additional one-year term through August 31, 2010. The board approved the agreement following the recommendation of the fund’s Contracts Committee (the “committee”), which is composed of all of the fund’s independent board members. The board and the committee determined that the fund’s advisory fee structure was fair and reasonable in relation to the services provided and that approving the agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
In reaching this decision, the board and the committee took into account information furnished to them throughout the year, as well as information prepared specifically in connection with their review of the agreement, and were advised by their independent counsel. They considered the factors discussed below, among others, but did not identify any single issue or particular piece of information that, in isolation, was the controlling factor.
1. Nature, extent and quality of services
The board and the committee considered the depth and quality of CRMC’s investment management process, including its global research capabilities; the experience, capability and integrity of its senior management and other personnel; the low turnover rates of its key personnel; the overall financial strength and stability of its organization; and the ongoing evolution of CRMC’s organizational structure designed to maintain and strengthen these qualities. The board and the committee considered, among other things, the impact of current market conditions on the fund and CRMC. The board and the committee also considered the nature, extent and quality of administrative, compliance and shareholder services provided by CRMC to the fund under the agreement and other agreements as well as the benefits to fund shareholders from investing in a fund that is part of a large family of funds. The board and the committee concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by CRMC have benefited and should continue to benefit the fund and its shareholders.
2. Investment results
The board and the committee considered the investment results of the fund in light of its objective of providing long-term growth of capital and income. They compared the fund’s total returns with those of other relevant funds (including the other funds that are the basis of the Lipper index for the category in which the fund is included) and market data such as relevant market indices, in each case as available at the time of the related meetings. In addition to the information reviewed by the board and the committee, this report, including the letter to shareholders and related disclosures, contains certain information about the fund’s investment results. The board and the committee concluded that although the fund’s net asset value per share had declined during the one-year period ended December 31, 2008, its long-term results have been satisfactory and that CRMC’s record in managing the fund indicated that its continued management should benefit the fund and its shareholders.
3. Advisory fees and total expenses
The board and the committee compared the advisory fees and total expense levels of the fund to those of other relevant funds. They observed that the fund’s advisory fees and expenses remain significantly below those of most other relevant funds. The board and the committee also noted the breakpoint discounts in the fund’s advisory fee structure that reduce the level of fees charged by CRMC to the fund as fund assets increase. In addition, they reviewed information regarding the advisory fees paid by institutional clients of an affiliate of CRMC with investment mandates similar to those of the fund. They noted that, although the fees paid by those clients generally were lower than those paid by the fund, the differences appropriately reflected the significant investment, operational and regulatory differences between advising mutual funds and institutional clients. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s cost structure was fair and reasonable in relation to the services provided, and that the shareholders receive reasonable value in return for the advisory fees and other amounts paid to CRMC by the fund.
4. Ancillary benefits
The board and the committee considered a variety of other benefits received by CRMC and its affiliates as a result of CRMC’s relationship with the fund and the other American Funds, including fees for administrative services provided to certain share classes; fees paid to CRMC’s affiliated transfer agent; sales charges and distribution fees received and retained by the fund’s principal underwriter, an affiliate of CRMC; and possible ancillary benefits to CRMC’s institutional management affiliates. The board and the committee reviewed CRMC’s portfolio trading practices, noting that while CRMC receives the benefit of research provided by broker-dealers executing portfolio transactions on behalf of the fund, it does not obtain third-party research or other services in return for allocating brokerage to such broker-dealers. The board and the committee took these ancillary benefits into account in evaluating the reasonableness of the advisory fees and other amounts paid to CRMC by the fund.
5. Adviser financial information
The board and the committee reviewed information regarding CRMC’s costs of providing services to the American Funds, including personnel, systems and resources of investment, compliance, trading, accounting and other administrative operations. They considered CRMC’s costs and willingness to invest in technology, infrastructure and staff to maintain and expand services and capabilities, respond to industry and regulatory developments, and attract and retain qualified personnel. They noted information previously received regarding the compensation structure for CRMC’s investment professionals. The board and the committee also compared CRMC’s profitability to the reported results of several large, publicly held investment management companies. The board and the committee noted the competitiveness and cyclicality of both the mutual fund industry and the capital markets, and the importance in that environment of CRMC’s long-term profitability for maintaining its independence, company culture and management continuity. They further considered the breakpoint discounts in the fund’s advisory fee structure and the termination of CRMC’s 10% advisory fee waiver effective December 31, 2008. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s advisory fee structure reflected a reasonable sharing of benefits between CRMC and the fund’s shareholders.
Results of meeting of shareholders held November 24, 2009
Shares outstanding (all classes) | | | | |
on record date (August 28, 2009): | | | 1,380,208,908 | | |
Total shares voting on November 24, 2009: | | | 883,462,712 | | 64.0% (of shares outstanding) |
Election of board members | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Director* | | Votes for | | | Percent of shares voting for | | | Votes withheld | | | Percent of shares withheld | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald P. Badie | | | 850,844,903 | | | | 96.3 | % | | | 32,617,809 | | | | 3.7 | % |
Joseph C. Berenato | | | 850,852,674 | | | | 96.3 | | | | 32,610,038 | | | | 3.7 | |
Louise H. Bryson | | | 850,934,706 | | | | 96.3 | | | | 32,528,006 | | | | 3.7 | |
Robert J. Denison | | | 850,867,885 | | | | 96.3 | | | | 32,594,827 | | | | 3.7 | |
Mary Anne Dolan | | | 850,872,317 | | | | 96.3 | | | | 32,590,395 | | | | 3.7 | |
Robert A. Fox | | | 850,743,412 | | | | 96.3 | | | | 32,719,300 | | | | 3.7 | |
John G. Freund | | | 850,790,833 | | | | 96.3 | | | | 32,671,879 | | | | 3.7 | |
Leonade D. Jones | | | 850,813,104 | | | | 96.3 | | | | 32,649,608 | | | | 3.7 | |
William H. Kling | | | 850,601,094 | | | | 96.3 | | | | 32,861,618 | | | | 3.7 | |
John G. McDonald | | | 850,665,315 | | | | 96.3 | | | | 32,797,397 | | | | 3.7 | |
Dina N. Perry | | | 850,905,418 | | | | 96.3 | | | | 32,557,294 | | | | 3.7 | |
James F. Rothenberg | | | 850,907,296 | | | | 96.3 | | | | 32,555,416 | | | | 3.7 | |
Christopher E. Stone | | | 850,886,977 | | | | 96.3 | | | | 32,575,735 | | | | 3.7 | |
| | Votes for | | | Percent of outstanding shares voting for | | | Votes against | | | Percent of outstanding shares voting against | | | Votes abstaining | | | Percent of outstanding shares abstaining | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To approve an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization | | | 702,463,282 | | | | 50.9 | % | | | 17,899,751 | | | | 1.3 | % | | | 163,099,679 | † | | | 11.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Votes for | | | Percent of outstanding shares voting for | | | Votes against | | | Percent of outstanding shares voting against | | | Votes abstaining | | | Percent of outstanding shares abstaining | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To update the fund’s fundamental investment policies regarding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Borrowing | | | 694,625,218 | | | | 78.6 | % | | | 25,911,668 | | | | 3.0 | % | | | 162,925,826 | † | | | 18.4 | % |
Issuance of senior securities | | | 695,160,917 | | | | 78.7 | | | | 24,747,085 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 163,554,710 | † | | | 18.5 | |
Underwriting | | 695,551,788 | | | | 78.7 | | | | 24,232,421 | | | | 2.7 | | | | 163,678,503 | † | | | 18.6 | |
Investments in real estate or commodities | | 693,397,638 | | | | 78.5 | | | | 26,973,967 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 163,091,107 | † | | | 18.5 | |
Lending | | 692,774,991 | | | | 78.4 | | | | 27,433,837 | | | | 3.1 | | | | 163,253,884 | † | | | 18.5 | |
Industry concentration | | 695,579,897 | | | | 78.7 | | | | 24,350,285 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 163,532,530 | † | | | 18.5 | |
Elimination of certain polices | | 692,571,825 | | | | 78.4 | | | | 26,227,569 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 164,663,318 | † | | | 18.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To approve a policy allowing CRMC to appoint subsidiary advisers for the fund’s day-to-day investment management without additional shareholder approval | | | 688,230,988 | | | | 77.9 | | | | 26,587,579 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 168,644,145 | † | | | 19.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To approve amendments to the fund’s Investment Advisory and Service Agreement with CRMC | | | 690,800,021 | | | | 78.2 | | | | 23,102,979 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 169,559,712 | † | | | 19.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To approve a form of Subsidiary Agreement and appointment of one or more subsidiary advisers for the fund | | | 688,868,241 | | | | 78.0 | | | | 25,179,244 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 169,415,227 | † | | | 19.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To consider a shareholder proposal regarding genocide-free investing | | | 81,858,292 | | | | 11.0 | | | | 618,308,319 | | | | 83.4 | | | | 41,293,579 | | | | 5.6 | |
(broker non-votes = | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 142,002,522 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| *Gail L. Neale and Henry E. Riggs did not stand for election at the Meeting of Shareholders because they plan to retire in December 2010. |
| †Includes broker non-votes. |
Board of directors and other officers
“Independent” directors | | |
| | |
| Year first | |
| elected a | |
| director of | |
Name and age | the fund1 | Principal occupation(s) during past five years |
| | |
Ronald P. Badie, 67 | 2008 | Retired; former Vice Chairman, Deutsche Bank |
| | Alex. Brown |
| | |
Joseph C. Berenato, 63 | 2003 | Chairman and CEO, Ducommun Incorporated |
Chairman of the Board | | (aerospace components manufacturer) |
(Independent and | | |
Non-Executive) | | |
| | |
Louise H. Bryson, 65 | 2008 | Chair of the Board of Trustees, J. Paul Getty Trust; |
| | former President, Distribution, Lifetime Entertainment |
| | Network; former Executive Vice President and |
| | General Manager, Lifetime Movie Network |
| | |
Robert J. Denison, 68 | 2005 | Chair, First Security Management (private investment) |
| | |
Mary Anne Dolan,4 62 | 2010 | Founder and President, MAD Ink (communications |
| | company); former Editor-in-Chief, The Los Angeles |
| | Herald Examiner |
| | |
Robert A. Fox, 72 | 1998 | Managing General Partner, Fox Investments LP; |
| | corporate director; retired President and CEO, Foster |
| | Farms (poultry producer) |
| | |
John G. Freund,4 56 | 2010 | Founder and Managing Director, Skyline Ventures |
| | (venture capital investor in health care companies) |
| | |
Leonade D. Jones, 62 | 1998 | Co-founder, VentureThink LLC (developed and |
| | managed e-commerce businesses) and Versura Inc. |
| | (education loan exchange); former Treasurer, The |
| | Washington Post Company |
| | |
William H. Kling,4 67 | 2010 | President and CEO, American Public Media Group |
| | |
John G. McDonald, 72 | 1998 | Stanford Investors Professor, Graduate School of |
| | Business, Stanford University |
| | |
Gail L. Neale, 75 | 1985 | President, The Lovejoy Consulting Group, Inc. |
| | (a pro bono consulting group advising nonprofit |
| | organizations) |
| | |
Henry E. Riggs, 75 | 1989 | President Emeritus, Keck Graduate Institute of |
| | Applied Life Sciences |
| | |
Christopher E. Stone,4 53 | 2010 | Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Professor of the |
| | Practice of Criminal Justice, John F. Kennedy School |
| | of Government, Harvard University |
| | |
| | |
“Independent” directors | | |
| | |
| Number of | |
| portfolios | |
| in fund | |
| complex2 | |
| overseen by | |
Name and age | director | Other directorships3 held by director |
| | |
Ronald P. Badie, 67 | 4 | Amphenol Corporation; Merisel, Inc.; Nautilus, Inc.; Obagi Medical Products, Inc. |
| | |
Joseph C. Berenato, 63 | 6 | None |
Chairman of the Board | | |
(Independent and | | |
Non-Executive) | | |
| | |
Louise H. Bryson, 65 | 6 | None |
| | |
Robert J. Denison, 68 | 7 | None |
| | |
Mary Anne Dolan,4 62 | 9 | None |
| | |
Robert A. Fox, 72 | 9 | None |
| | |
John G. Freund,4 56 | 3 | Hansen Medical, Inc.; Mako Surgical Corporation; |
| | MAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; XenoPort, Inc. |
| | |
Leonade D. Jones, 62 | 9 | None |
| | |
William H. Kling,4 67 | 9 | None |
| | |
John G. McDonald, 72 | 12 | iStar Financial, Inc.; Plum Creek Timber Co.; |
| | Scholastic Corporation; Varian, Inc. |
| | |
Gail L. Neale, 75 | 5 | None |
| | |
Henry E. Riggs, 75 | 5 | None |
| | |
Christopher E. Stone,4 53 | 6 | None |
Patricia K. Woolf retired from the board in December 2009. The directors thank Dr. Woolf for her dedication and long service to the fund.
The fund’s statement of additional information includes additional information about fund directors and is available without charge upon request by calling American Funds Service Company at 800/421-0180. The address for all directors and officers of the fund is 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071, Attention: Secretary.
See page 36 for footnotes.
“Interested” directors5 | | |
| | |
| Year first | |
| elected a | |
| director or | Principal occupation(s) during past five years and |
Name, age and | officer of | positions held with affiliated entities or the |
position with fund | the fund1 | principal underwriter of the fund |
| | |
James F. Rothenberg, 63 | 1998 | Chairman of the Board, Capital Research and |
Vice Chairman of the Board | | Management Company; Director and Non-Executive Chair, American Funds Distributors, Inc.;6 Director and Non-Executive Chair, The Capital Group Companies, Inc.6 |
| | |
Dina N. Perry, 64 | 1994 | Senior Vice President — Capital World Investors, |
President | | Capital Research and Management Company; Director, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
| | |
“Interested” directors5 | | |
| | |
| Number of | |
| portfolios | |
| in fund | |
| complex2 | |
Name, age and | overseen by | |
position with fund | director | Other directorships3 held by director |
| | |
James F. Rothenberg, 63 | 2 | None |
Vice Chairman of the Board | | |
| | |
| | |
Dina N. Perry, 64 | 1 | None |
President | | |
Other officers7 | | |
| | |
| Year first | |
| elected | Principal occupation(s) during past five years |
Name, age and | an officer | and positions held with affiliated entities or the |
position with fund | of the fund1 | principal underwriter of the fund |
| | |
Paul G. Haaga, Jr., 61 | | |
Executive Vice President | 1994 | Vice Chairman of the Board, Capital Research and |
| | Management Company; Senior Vice President — |
| | Fixed Income, Capital Research and Management |
| | Company |
Michael T. Kerr, 50 | | |
Senior Vice President | 1995 | Senior Vice President — Capital World Investors, |
| | Capital Research and Management Company; |
| | Director, Capital Research and Management |
| | Company |
Martin Romo,7 42 | | |
Senior Vice President | 1999 | Senior Vice President — Capital World Investors, |
| | Capital Research Company;6 Director and |
| | Co-President, Capital Research Company;6 |
| | Director, The Capital Group Companies, Inc.6 |
| | |
Mark L. Casey,7 39 | 2008 | Senior Vice President — Capital World Investors, |
Vice President | | Capital Research Company;6 Director, |
| | Capital Research Company6 |
| | |
Ronald B. Morrow, 64 | 2004 | Senior Vice President — Capital World Investors, |
Vice President | | Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Donald H. Rolfe, 37 | 2007 | Associate Counsel — Fund Business Management |
Vice President | | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Patrick F. Quan, 51 | 1989–1998 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Secretary | 2000 | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Jeffrey P. Regal, 38 | 2006 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Treasurer | | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Gregory F. Niland, 38 | 2009 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Assistant Treasurer | | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| 1Directors and officers of the fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement. |
| 2Capital Research and Management Company manages the American Funds, consisting of 30 funds. Capital Research and Management Company also manages American Funds Insurance Series,® which is composed of 16 funds and serves as the underlying investment vehicle for certain variable insurance contracts; American Funds Target Date Retirement Series,® Inc., which is composed of 10 funds and is available through tax-deferred retirement plans and IRAs; and Endowments, which is available to certain nonprofit organizations. |
| 3This includes all directorships (other than those in the American Funds or other funds managed by Capital Research and Management Company) that are held by each director as a director of a public company or a registered investment company. |
| 4Mary Anne Dolan, John G. Freund, William H. Kling and Christopher E. Stone were newly elected to the board by the fund’s shareholders effective January 1, 2010. |
| 5“Interested persons” within the meaning of the 1940 Act, as amended, on the basis of their affiliation with the fund’s investment adviser, Capital Research and Management Company, or affiliated entities (including the fund’s principal underwriter). |
| 6Company affiliated with Capital Research and Management Company. |
| 7 All of the officers listed, except Martin Romo and Mark L. Casey, are officers and/or directors/trustees of one or more of the other funds for which Capital Research and Management Company serves as investment adviser. |
Office of the fund
One Market
Steuart Tower, Suite 1800
Mailing address: P.O. Box 7650
San Francisco, CA 94120-7650
Investment adviser
Capital Research and Management Company
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
6455 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA 92618
Transfer agent for shareholder accounts
American Funds Service Company
(Write to the address near you.)
P.O. Box 6007
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6007
P.O. Box 2280
Norfolk, VA 23501-2280
Custodian of assets
State Street Bank and Trust Company
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111
Counsel
K&L Gates LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111-5994
Independent registered public accounting firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
695 Town Center Drive
Suite 1200
Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7188
Principal underwriter
American Funds Distributors, Inc.
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the American Funds. This and other important information is contained in the fund’s summary prospectus and prospectus, which can be obtained from your financial professional and should be read carefully before investing. You may also call American Funds Service Company (AFS) at 800/421-0180 or visit the American Funds website at americanfunds.com.
“American Funds Proxy Voting Procedures and Principles” — which describes how we vote proxies relating to portfolio securities — is available on the American Funds website or upon request by calling AFS. The fund files its proxy voting record with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the 12 months ended June 30 by August 31. The proxy voting record is available free of charge on the SEC website at sec.gov and on the American Funds website.
A complete December 31, 2009, portfolio of Fundamental Investors’ investments is available free of charge by calling AFS or visiting the SEC website (where it is part of Form N-CSR).
Fundamental Investors files a complete list of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. This filing is available free of charge on the SEC website. You may also review or, for a fee, copy this filing at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Additional information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy at 800/SEC-0330. Additionally, the list of portfolio holdings is available by calling AFS.
This report is for the information of shareholders of Fundamental Investors, but it also may be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current summary prospectus or prospectus, which gives details about charges, expenses, investment objectives and operating policies of the fund. If used as sales material after March 31, 2010, this report must be accompanied by an American Funds statistical update for the most recently completed calendar quarter.
[logo - American Funds®]
The right choice for the long term®
What makes American Funds different?
For nearly 80 years, we have followed a consistent philosophy to benefit our investors. Our 30 carefully conceived, broadly diversified funds, in addition to the target date retirement series, offer opportunities that have attracted over 50 million shareholder accounts.
Our unique combination of strengths includes these five factors:
| •A long-term, value-oriented approach |
| We seek to buy securities at reasonable prices relative to their prospects and hold them for the long term. |
| •An extensive global research effort |
| Our investment professionals travel the world to find the best investment opportunities and gain a comprehensive understanding of companies and markets. |
| •The multiple portfolio counselor system |
| Our unique approach to portfolio management, developed 50 years ago, blends teamwork with individual accountability and has provided American Funds with a sustainable method of achieving fund objectives. |
| •Experienced investment professionals |
| American Funds portfolio counselors have an average of 25 years of investment experience, providing a depth of knowledge and broad perspective that few organizations have. |
| •A commitment to low management fees |
| The American Funds provide exceptional value for shareholders, with management fees that are among the lowest in the mutual fund industry. |
American Funds span a range of investment objectives
| Emphasis on long-term growth through stocks |
| The Growth Fund of America® |
| Emphasis on long-term growth and dividends through stocks |
| Capital World Growth and Income FundSM |
| International Growth and Income FundSM |
| The Investment Company of America® |
| Washington Mutual Investors FundSM |
| Emphasis on above-average income and growth through stocks and/or bonds |
| The Income Fund of America® |
| Emphasis on long-term growth and current income through stocks and bonds |
| Emphasis on current income through bonds |
| American High-Income TrustSM |
| The Bond Fund of AmericaSM |
| Intermediate Bond Fund of America® |
| Short-Term Bond Fund of AmericaSM |
| U.S. Government Securities FundSM |
| Emphasis on tax-exempt current income through municipal bonds |
| American Funds Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond FundSM |
| American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund® |
| Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of AmericaSM |
| The Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America® |
| State-specific tax-exempt funds |
| The Tax-Exempt Fund of California® |
| The Tax-Exempt Fund of Maryland® |
| The Tax-Exempt Fund of Virginia® |
| American Funds Money Market FundSM |
| •American Funds Target Date Retirement Series® |
The Capital Group Companies
American Funds Capital Research and Management Capital International Capital Guardian Capital Bank and Trust
Lit. No. MFGEAR-910-0210P
Litho in USA KBDA/RRD/8056-S20668
Printed on paper containing 10% post-consumer waste
Printed with inks containing soy and/or vegetable oil
ITEM 2 – Code of Ethics