The right choice for the long term®
Fundamental Investors
The path we have traveled and the road ahead
[photo of Bow River and a Canadian Pacific train on Morant's Curve in Lake Louise, Alberta, Canada]
Annual report for the year ended December 31, 2008
Fundamental InvestorsSM seeks long-term growth of capital and income primarily through investments in common stocks.
This fund is one of the 31 American Funds. American Funds is one of the nation’s largest mutual fund families. For more than 75 years, Capital Research and Management Company,SM the American Funds adviser, has invested with a long-term focus based on thorough research and attention to risk.
Fund results shown in this report, unless otherwise indicated, are for Class A shares at net asset value. If a sales charge (maximum 5.75%) had been deducted, the results would have been lower. Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. Investing for short periods makes losses more likely. Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Here are the average annual total returns on a $1,000 investment with all distributions reinvested for periods ended December 31, 2008:
Class A shares | | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | 10 years | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting 5.75% maximum sales charge | | | –43.16 | % | | | –0.42 | % | | | 2.30 | % |
The total annual fund operating expense ratio was 0.63% for Class A shares as of the most recent fiscal year-end. This figure does not reflect the fee waiver described below. Therefore, the actual expense ratio for the period was lower.
Investment results assume all distributions are reinvested and reflect applicable fees and expenses. The fund’s investment adviser waived a portion of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through December 31, 2008. Respective fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. Please see the Financial Highlights table on pages 23 and 24 for details.
The fund’s 30-day yield for Class A shares as of January 31, 2009, calculated in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission formula, was 1.99%. The fund’s distribution rate for Class A shares as of that date was 2.33%. Both reflect the 5.75% maximum sales charge. The SEC yield reflects the rate at which the fund is earning income on its current portfolio of securities while the distribution rate reflects the fund’s past dividends paid to shareholders. Accordingly, the fund’s SEC yield and distribution rate may differ.
Results for other share classes can be found on page 30.
Investing outside the United States may be subject to additional risks, such as currency fluctuations and political instability, which are detailed in the fund’s prospectus.
Fellow shareholders:
Fundamental Investors’ 2008 results speak to the unusually difficult conditions experienced by the global economy and capital markets. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2008, the fund suffered a 39.7% loss for those shareholders who reinvested quarterly dividends totaling 58 cents a share and the 26-cent February 2008 capital gain distribution.
This trailed the returns of the fund’s two main benchmarks, the unmanaged Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index (a broad measure of the U.S. stock market), which fell 37.0%, and the Lipper Growth and Income Funds Index, a gauge of the fund’s category peers, which dropped 37.5%.
The MSCI World Index, a measure of stocks in 23 developed countries, fell further than the fund and its benchmarks, finishing down 40.3%. Though not a primary benchmark, the index is offered for reference, as Fundamental Investors is able to invest up to 30% of assets outside the United States and Canada.
While the fund’s five- and 10-year figures were considerably diminished by the past year’s decline, they nonetheless exceed the returns recorded by the S&P 500 and the Lipper index for those periods, as shown in the table below. Fundamental Investors’ average annual lifetime return of 11.8% — which encompasses the 30 years the fund has been managed by Capital Research and Management Company — has surpassed its benchmarks as well.
[Begin Sidebar]
Results at a glance | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(For periods ended December 31, 2008, with all distributions reinvested) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total returns | | | Average annual total returns | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | 10 years | | | Lifetime* | |
Fundamental Investors | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Class A shares) | | | –39.7 | % | | | 0.8 | % | | | 2.9 | % | | | 11.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index† | | | –37.0 | | | | –2.2 | | | | –1.4 | | | | 10.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lipper Growth and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Funds Index | | | –37.5 | | | | –2.1 | | | | –0.2 | | | | 10.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MSCI World Index† | | | –40.3 | | | | 0.0 | | | | –0.2 | | | | 9.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
*Since Capital Research and Management Company began managing the fund on August 1, 1978. | | | | | | | | | |
†Unmanaged. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
[End Sidebar]
[photo of a Canadian Pacific train on Morant's Curve in Lake Louise, Alberta, Canada]
[Begin Sidebar]
In this report | |
| |
| Special feature |
| |
6 | The path we have traveled |
| and the road ahead |
| |
| The fund’s portfolio counselors |
| reflect on a difficult investment |
| environment and the opportunities |
| that may emerge from it. |
| |
| Contents |
| |
1 | Letter to shareholders |
| |
4 | Results of a $10,000 investment |
| in Fundamental Investors |
| |
12 | Summary investment |
| portfolio |
| |
15 | Financial statements |
| |
31 | Board of directors and |
| other officers |
[End Sidebar]
Income remains important
Providing shareholders with regular quarterly income remains one of Fundamental Investors’ primary objectives. Though its share price declined during the period, the fund nonetheless delivered on its income goal. Despite many companies reducing or eliminating their payouts, the fund provided a 12-month dividend yield of 2.30% — a figure that takes into account a 10-cent special dividend paid in December 2008.
A pervasive and intense downturn
The subprime mortgage troubles that periodically unsettled financial markets in 2007 grew into a full-fledged crisis that defined the 2008 investment environment. As hundreds of billions in mortgage securities went bad, the balance sheets of many financial institutions became suspect. Lending among these institutions — an activity critical to their successful functioning — virtually ceased. As the credit freeze deepened, consumers and businesses found it difficult to borrow and economic activity slowed significantly.
Governments and central banks around the world undertook extraordinary measures and coordinated their efforts to keep the crisis from deepening. However, a steady stream of bad news, mounting layoffs and gloomy economic indicators darkened investor sentiment and sparked further volatility.
Weakness in many sectors
Naturally, the financial sector was hit hardest. The fund entered the tumultuous period with a relatively low concentration among these companies, but some we held were at the center of the storm. Among our investments were Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Washington Mutual, all of which incurred significant losses before we liquidated our positions.
Many energy and materials investments — key contributors to Fundamental Investors’ results over the past several years — saw their share prices plunge as the economic slowdown sharply curtailed demand for commodities. The stock prices for commodity suppliers generally move in tandem with the prices of the commodities themselves. Thus, the fund lagged its benchmarks the most during the third quarter, when declines in commodity prices accelerated.
The effect of this trend was perhaps most evident in the share value of Suncor Energy (–64.2%), which for several years had been our largest holding but slipped to second place. Among other significant investments in the energy sector, Tenaris (–53.1%), EnCana (–31.3%) and Occidental Petroleum (–22.1%) all were down.
These particular areas were trouble spots, but results for the fund’s top 10 holdings — a group representing several industries — reveal the breadth and global nature of the situation. Mobile telephone equipment giant Nokia (–59.5%), now the fund’s largest holding; Merck (–47.7%); Microsoft (–45.4%); network hardware supplier Cisco Systems (–39.8%); AT&T (–31.4%); and software producer Oracle (–21.5%) all fell sharply. Drug producer Roche (–11.1%) and home improvement retailer Lowe’s (–4.9%) recorded more modest declines.
McDonald’s (+5.6%), the lone top 10 position to record a gain, benefited from a tendency among consumers to seek out lower priced goods during tough economic times. This same effect had a positive impact on shares of Wal-Mart Stores (+18.0%), a sizable fund investment. They were two of only six companies out of more than 200 held for the full 12 months to post a gain.
Also helping results were the fund’s sizable investments in pharmaceuticals. This sector has typically held up better than the broader market during economic downturns and did so again this past year. That said, it did, on the whole, decline. While food, beverage and tobacco holdings were a relatively small portion of fund assets, they too aided results.
A weakening U.S. dollar had been a tailwind in the past few years, but its effect on the 23.0% of the fund’s portfolio invested in companies based outside the U.S. was mixed in 2008. (When the dollar weakens against a particular currency, U.S. investors in companies denominated in that currency benefit as the investment becomes worth more when translated back into U.S. dollars.) The U.S. currency strengthened against the euro, the British pound and the Canadian dollar while weakening against the yen and the Swiss franc.
Looking ahead
When it comes to identifying investment opportunities in the present environment, market volatility and economic uncertainty make separating the wheat from the chaff especially challenging. Based on traditional valuation measures, many companies appear to be attractively priced. Yet this was true throughout much of 2008, and in some cases we did invest only to see a company’s stock decline further.
[Begin Sidebar]
Fundamental Investors’ total return year by year (ending December 31) | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Capital return | | | Income return | | | Total return | |
| | | | | | | | | |
1999 | | | 23.2 | % | | | 1.4 | % | | | 24.6 | % |
2000 | | | 3.1 | | | | 1.2 | | | | 4.3 | |
2001 | | | –10.9 | | | | 1.3 | | | | –9.6 | |
2002 | | | –19.1 | | | | 1.8 | | | | –17.3 | |
2003 | | | 30.2 | | | | 1.8 | | | | 32.0 | |
2004 | | | 11.9 | | | | 2.0 | | | | 13.9 | |
2005 | | | 9.9 | | | | 1.8 | | | | 11.7 | |
2006 | | | 17.6 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 19.2 | |
2007 | | | 11.2 | | | | 2.4 | | | | 13.6 | |
2008 | | | –41.1 | | | | 1.4 | | | | –39.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
10-year average annual total return | | | | | | | | | | | 2.9 | % |
10-year cumulative total return | | | | | | | | | | | 33.1 | |
Lifetime cumulative total return (since 8/1/78) | | | | | | | | | | | 2,916.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return measures both capital results (changes in net asset value) and income return (from dividends). | | | | | | | | | | | | |
All returns assume reinvestment of all dividends and capital gain distributions. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
[End Sidebar]
Nonetheless, with caution as our watchword, we remain focused on finding companies we believe can reward shareholders over the long term. The sweeping nature of the recent market downturn may have left some questioning the importance of fundamental research. But we will continue to follow the bottom-up, company-by-company approach that has historically served the fund well. We believe that it is crucial to understanding this highly complex environment and identifying promising investment opportunities.
As these opportunities present themselves, we have the resources to act; as of December 31, 2008, nearly 12% of the fund’s assets were held in cash and short-term securities.
For more of our thoughts on the period we’ve come through and how we are positioning the fund for the future, please turn to the feature article that begins on page 6.
Staying the course
It’s often been said that no one rings a bell when the market reaches its high, just as no one signals when stocks have hit their nadir. Staying the course is crucial, and we are doing our best to position Fundamental Investors for better market days — whenever they arrive.
In these difficult times, we are more thankful than ever for your commitment to long-term investing.
Sincerely,
/s/ James F. Rothenberg
James F. Rothenberg
Vice Chairman
/s/ Dina N. Perry
Dina N. Perry
President
February 6, 2009
For current information about the fund, visit americanfunds.com.
Results of a $10,000 investment in Fundamental Investors
How a $10,000 investment has grown
The chart and the table below it illustrate how a $10,000 investment in the fund grew between August 1, 1978 — when Capital Research and Management Company became Fundamental Investors’ investment adviser — and December 31, 2008. The chart also shows how Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index and the Lipper Growth and Income Funds Index fared over this same period, and what happened to inflation (as measured by the Consumer Price Index).
Fund results shown are for Class A shares and reflect deduction of the maximum sales charge of 5.75% on the $10,000 investment.1 Thus, the net amount invested was $9,425.2 Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Average annual total returns based on a $1,000 investment (for periods ended December 31, 2008)* | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | 10 years | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Class A shares | | | –43.16 | % | | | –0.42 | % | | | 2.30 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
*Assumes reinvestment of all distributions and payment of the maximum 5.75% sales charge. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The total annual fund operating expense ratio was 0.63% for Class A shares as of the most recent fiscal year-end. This figure does not reflect the fee waiver described below. Therefore, the actual expense ratio for the period was lower.
Investment results assume all distributions are reinvested and reflect applicable fees and expenses. The fund’s investment adviser waived a portion of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through December 31, 2008. Respective fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. Please see the Financial Highlights table on pages 23 and 24 for details.
[begin mountain chart]
| | | Fundamental Investors with dividends reinvested1,3 | | | Fundamental Investors not including dividends1,5 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Initial Investment | 7/31/1978 | | $ | 9,425 | | | $ | 9,425 | |
High | 11-Sep-78 | | | 10,000 | | | | 9,919 | |
Low | 14-Nov-78 | | | 8,667 | | | | 8,596 | |
Close | 29-Dec-78 | | | 9,155 | | | | 8,947 | |
Low | 27-Feb-79 | | | 9,086 | | | | 8,880 | |
High | 5-Oct-79 | | | 10,823 | | | | 10,310 | |
Close | 31-Dec-79 | | | 10,556 | | | | 9,892 | |
Low | 21-Apr-80 | | | 9,625 | | | | 8,907 | |
High | 20-Nov-80 | | | 13,131 | | | | 11,876 | |
Close | 31-Dec-80 | | | 12,807 | | | | 11,390 | |
High | 27-Apr-81 | | | 13,986 | | | | 12,308 | |
Low | 25-Sep-81 | | | 11,906 | | | | 10,243 | |
Close | 31-Dec-81 | | | 12,654 | | | | 10,688 | |
Low | 22-Jan-82 | | | 10,593 | | | | 8,947 | |
High | 7-Dec-82 | | | 17,346 | | | | 13,833 | |
Close | 31-Dec-82 | | | 16,957 | | | | 13,522 | |
Low | 3-Jan-83 | | | 16,636 | | | | 13,266 | |
High | 10-Oct-83 | | | 21,599 | | | | 16,721 | |
Close | 30-Dec-83 | | | 21,389 | | | | 16,424 | |
High | 9-Jan-84 | | | 22,004 | | | | 16,896 | |
Low | 24-Jul-84 | | | 18,549 | | | | 13,980 | |
Close | 31-Dec-84 | | | 22,621 | | | | 16,759 | |
Low | 1-May-85 | | | 22,882 | | | | 16,819 | |
High | 16-Dec-85 | | | 29,736 | | | | 21,355 | |
Close | 31-Dec-85 | | | 29,448 | | | | 21,148 | |
Low | 14-Feb-86 | | | 31,766 | | | | 22,665 | |
High | 4-Sep-86 | | | 36,571 | | | | 25,757 | |
Close | 31-Dec-86 | | | 35,941 | | | | 25,151 | |
High | 25-Aug-87 | | | 50,132 | | | | 34,478 | |
Low | 4-Dec-87 | | | 33,691 | | | | 23,002 | |
Close | 31-Dec-87 | | | 37,295 | | | | 25,463 | |
Low | 20-Jan-88 | | | 36,464 | | | | 24,895 | |
High | 5-Jul-88 | | | 43,076 | | | | 28,988 | |
Close | 30-Dec-88 | | | 43,246 | | | | 28,561 | |
Low | 3-Jan-89 | | | 43,068 | | | | 28,443 | |
High | 9-Oct-89 | | | 58,786 | | | | 38,138 | |
Close | 29-Dec-89 | | | 55,597 | | | | 35,438 | |
High | 4-Jun-90 | | | 60,265 | | | | 37,947 | |
Low | 11-Oct-90 | | | 46,988 | | | | 29,390 | |
Close | 31-Dec-90 | | | 52,130 | | | | 32,180 | |
Low | 9-Jan-91 | | | 50,201 | | | | 30,989 | |
High | 31-Dec-91 | | | 67,947 | | | | 40,940 | |
Close | 31-Dec-91 | | | 67,947 | | | | 40,940 | |
Low | 8-Apr-92 | | | 66,472 | | | | 39,828 | |
High | 12-Nov-92 | | | 72,487 | | | | 42,938 | |
Close | 31-Dec-92 | | | 74,871 | | | | 44,059 | |
Low | 8-Jan-93 | | | 74,615 | | | | 43,908 | |
High | 2-Nov-93 | | | 88,379 | | | | 51,169 | |
Close | 31-Dec-93 | | | 88,466 | | | | 50,884 | |
High | 2-Feb-94 | | | 91,634 | | | | 52,706 | |
Low | 8-Dec-94 | | | 86,773 | | | | 48,708 | |
Close | 30-Dec-94 | | | 89,641 | | | | 50,319 | |
Low | 3-Jan-95 | | | 89,539 | | | | 50,261 | |
High | 29-Nov-95 | | | 119,498 | | | | 66,056 | |
Close | 29-Dec-95 | | | 120,306 | | | | 66,210 | |
Low | 10-Jan-96 | | | 117,715 | | | | 64,784 | |
High | 26-Nov-96 | | | 145,602 | | | | 79,119 | |
Close | 31-Dec-96 | | | 144,352 | | | | 78,143 | |
Low | 11-Apr-97 | | | 144,443 | | | | 77,891 | |
High | 7-Oct-97 | | | 189,427 | | | | 101,423 | |
Close | 31-Dec-97 | | | 182,855 | | | | 97,513 | |
High | 17-Jul-98 | | | 212,584 | | | | 112,606 | |
Low | 8-Oct-98 | | | 173,534 | | | | 91,600 | |
Close | 31-Dec-98 | | | 213,421 | | | | 112,292 | |
Low | 14-Jan-99 | | | 211,060 | | | | 111,050 | |
High | 10-Dec-99 | | | 258,554 | | | | 134,742 | |
Close | 31-Dec-99 | | | 265,882 | | | | 138,151 | |
High | 1-Sep-00 | | | 293,957 | | | | 151,363 | |
Low | 21-Dec-00 | | | 266,380 | | | | 136,743 | |
Close | 29-Dec-00 | | | 277,235 | | | | 142,315 | |
High | 1-Feb-01 | | | 287,822 | | | | 147,750 | |
Low | 21-Sep-01 | | | 211,970 | | | | 107,718 | |
Close | 31-Dec-01 | | | 250,761 | | | | 126,959 | |
High | 19-Mar-02 | | | 260,698 | | | | 131,491 | |
Low | 9-Oct-02 | | | 182,355 | | | | 91,253 | |
Close | 31-Dec-02 | | | 207,271 | | | | 102,816 | |
Low | 12-Mar-03 | | | 186,058 | | | | 91,854 | |
High | 31-Dec-03 | | | 273,523 | | | | 133,434 | |
Close | 31-Dec-03 | | | 273,523 | | | | 133,434 | |
Low | 17-May-04 | | | 264,555 | | | | 128,624 | |
High | 30-Dec-04 | | | 311,756 | | | | 149,252 | |
Close | 31-Dec-04 | | | 311,563 | | | | 149,159 | |
Low | 28-Apr-05 | | | 297,315 | | | | 141,898 | |
High | 14-Dec-05 | | | 352,458 | | | | 167,197 | |
Close | 30-Dec-05 | | | 347,960 | | | | 163,728 | |
Low | 13-Jun-06 | | | 354,244 | | | | 165,717 | |
High | 14-Dec-06 | | | 416,828 | | | | 194,392 | |
Close | 29-Dec-06 | | | 414,904 | | | | 192,480 | |
Low | 5-Mar-07 | | | 406,016 | | | | 187,812 | |
High | 31-Oct-07 | | | 490,222 | | | | 225,499 | |
Close | 31-Dec-07 | | | 471,134 | | | | 213,905 | |
Low | 20-Nov-08 | | | 236,224 | | | | 106,274 | |
High | 19-May-08 | | | 477,753 | | | | 216,251 | |
Close | 31-Dec-08 | | | 284,112 | | | | 126,717 | |
| | | S&P 500 with dividends reinvested | |
| | | | | |
| | | $ | 10,000 | |
High | 12-Sep-78 | | | 10,670 | |
Low | 14-Nov-78 | | | 9,306 | |
Close | 29-Dec-78 | | | 9,762 | |
Low | 27-Feb-79 | | | 9,807 | |
High | 5-Oct-79 | | | 11,769 | |
Close | 31-Dec-79 | | | 11,579 | |
Low | 27-Mar-80 | | | 10,627 | |
High | 28-Nov-80 | | | 15,813 | |
Close | 31-Dec-80 | | | 15,336 | |
High | 6-Jan-81 | | | 15,603 | |
Low | 25-Sep-81 | | | 13,172 | |
Close | 31-Dec-81 | | | 14,581 | |
Low | 12-Aug-82 | | | 12,625 | |
High | 9-Nov-82 | | | 17,877 | |
Close | 31-Dec-82 | | | 17,723 | |
Low | 3-Jan-83 | | | 17,433 | |
High | 10-Oct-83 | | | 22,491 | |
Close | 30-Dec-83 | | | 21,721 | |
Low | 24-Jul-84 | | | 19,933 | |
High | 6-Nov-84 | | | 23,337 | |
Close | 31-Dec-84 | | | 23,083 | |
Low | 4-Jan-85 | | | 22,592 | |
High | 16-Dec-85 | | | 30,417 | |
Close | 31-Dec-85 | | | 30,407 | |
Low | 22-Jan-86 | | | 29,286 | |
High | 2-Dec-86 | | | 37,737 | |
Close | 31-Dec-86 | | | 36,082 | |
High | 25-Aug-87 | | | 51,060 | |
Low | 4-Dec-87 | | | 34,314 | |
Close | 31-Dec-87 | | | 37,977 | |
Low | 20-Jan-88 | | | 37,293 | |
High | 21-Oct-88 | | | 44,800 | |
Close | 30-Dec-88 | | | 44,267 | |
Low | 3-Jan-89 | | | 43,883 | |
High | 9-Oct-89 | | | 58,837 | |
Close | 29-Dec-89 | | | 58,269 | |
High | 16-Jul-90 | | | 61,897 | |
Low | 11-Oct-90 | | | 50,026 | |
Close | 31-Dec-90 | | | 56,457 | |
Low | 9-Jan-91 | | | 53,255 | |
High | 31-Dec-91 | | | 73,620 | |
Close | 31-Dec-91 | | | 73,620 | |
Low | 8-Apr-92 | | | 70,130 | |
High | 18-Dec-92 | | | 80,063 | |
Close | 31-Dec-92 | | | 79,222 | |
Low | 8-Jan-93 | | | 78,011 | |
High | 28-Dec-93 | | | 87,854 | |
Close | 31-Dec-93 | | | 87,189 | |
High | 2-Feb-94 | | | 90,223 | |
Low | 4-Apr-94 | | | 82,600 | |
Close | 30-Dec-94 | | | 88,336 | |
Low | 3-Jan-95 | | | 88,305 | |
High | 13-Dec-95 | | | 122,408 | |
Close | 29-Dec-95 | | | 121,491 | |
Low | 10-Jan-96 | | | 118,049 | |
High | 25-Nov-96 | | | 152,084 | |
Close | 31-Dec-96 | | | 149,367 | |
Low | 2-Jan-97 | | | 148,615 | |
High | 5-Dec-97 | | | 201,641 | |
Close | 31-Dec-97 | | | 199,183 | |
Low | 9-Jan-98 | | | 190,410 | |
High | 29-Dec-98 | | | 258,425 | |
Close | 31-Dec-98 | | | 256,100 | |
Low | 14-Jan-99 | | | 252,550 | |
High | 31-Dec-99 | | | 309,980 | |
Close | 31-Dec-99 | | | 309,980 | |
High | 24-Mar-00 | | | 322,882 | |
Low | 20-Dec-00 | | | 269,684 | |
Close | 29-Dec-00 | | | 281,766 | |
High | 30-Jan-01 | | | 293,173 | |
Low | 21-Sep-01 | | | 207,919 | |
Close | 31-Dec-01 | | | 248,303 | |
High | 4-Jan-02 | | | 253,587 | |
Low | 9-Oct-02 | | | 169,983 | |
Close | 31-Dec-02 | | | 193,447 | |
Low | 11-Mar-03 | | | 176,642 | |
High | 31-Dec-03 | | | 248,903 | |
Close | 31-Dec-03 | | | 248,903 | |
Low | 12-Aug-04 | | | 240,252 | |
High | 30-Dec-04 | | | 275,924 | |
Close | 31-Dec-04 | | | 275,970 | |
Low | 20-Apr-05 | | | 260,187 | |
High | 14-Dec-05 | | | 294,796 | |
Close | 30-Dec-05 | | | 289,511 | |
Low | 13-Jun-06 | | | 286,100 | |
High | 15-Dec-06 | | | 336,807 | |
Close | 29-Dec-06 | | | 335,199 | |
Low | 5-Mar-07 | | | 325,873 | |
High | 9-Oct-07 | | | 374,990 | |
Close | 31-Dec-07 | | | 353,601 | |
Low | 20-Nov-08 | | | 184,490 | |
High | 2-Jan-08 | | | 348,496 | |
Close | 31-Dec-08 | | | 222,801 | |
| | | Lipper Growth and Income Funds Index with dividends reinvested4 | |
| | | | |
| | | $ | 10,000 | |
High | 31-Aug-78 | | | 10,369 | |
Low | 31-Oct-78 | | | 9,237 | |
Close | 29-Dec-78 | | | 9,684 | |
Low | 28-Feb-79 | | | 9,822 | |
High | 31-Dec-79 | | | 11,995 | |
Close | 31-Dec-79 | | | 11,995 | |
Low | 31-Mar-80 | | | 11,317 | |
High | 30-Nov-80 | | | 15,695 | |
Close | 31-Dec-80 | | | 15,386 | |
High | 31-May-81 | | | 15,965 | |
Low | 30-Sep-81 | | | 14,172 | |
Close | 31-Dec-81 | | | 15,172 | |
Low | 31-Jul-82 | | | 14,274 | |
High | 31-Dec-82 | | | 18,839 | |
Close | 31-Dec-82 | | | 18,839 | |
Low | 31-Jan-83 | | | 19,378 | |
High | 30-Nov-83 | | | 23,277 | |
Close | 30-Dec-83 | | | 23,127 | |
Low | 31-May-84 | | | 21,038 | |
High | 31-Dec-84 | | | 24,119 | |
Close | 31-Dec-84 | | | 24,119 | |
Low | 31-Jan-85 | | | 25,851 | |
High | 31-Dec-85 | | | 31,006 | |
Close | 31-Dec-85 | | | 31,006 | |
Low | 31-Jan-86 | | | 31,537 | |
High | 31-Aug-86 | | | 37,352 | |
Close | 31-Dec-86 | | | 36,472 | |
High | 31-Aug-87 | | | 47,533 | |
Low | 30-Nov-87 | | | 35,112 | |
Close | 31-Dec-87 | | | 37,434 | |
Low | 31-Jan-88 | | | 39,236 | |
High | 30-Dec-88 | | | 44,304 | |
Close | 30-Dec-88 | | | 44,304 | |
Low | 28-Feb-89 | | | 46,392 | |
High | 31-Aug-89 | | | 55,358 | |
Close | 29-Dec-89 | | | 54,819 | |
High | 31-May-90 | | | 55,785 | |
Low | 31-Oct-90 | | | 47,212 | |
Close | 31-Dec-90 | | | 51,534 | |
Low | 31-Jan-91 | | | 54,196 | |
High | 31-Dec-91 | | | 65,836 | |
Close | 31-Dec-91 | | | 65,836 | |
Low | 31-Jan-92 | | | 65,763 | |
High | 31-Dec-92 | | | 72,177 | |
Close | 31-Dec-92 | | | 72,177 | |
Low | 31-Jan-93 | | | 73,298 | |
High | 31-Dec-93 | | | 82,730 | |
Close | 31-Dec-93 | | | 82,730 | |
Low | 20-Apr-94 | | | 79,545 | |
High | 31-Aug-94 | | | 85,813 | |
Close | 30-Dec-94 | | | 82,387 | |
Low | 3-Jan-95 | | | 82,387 | |
High | 6-Dec-95 | | | 108,087 | |
Close | 29-Dec-95 | | | 108,042 | |
Low | 10-Jan-96 | | | 105,553 | |
High | 27-Dec-96 | | | 131,831 | |
Close | 31-Dec-96 | | | 130,379 | |
Low | 2-Jan-97 | | | 129,511 | |
High | 8-Oct-97 | | | 167,437 | |
Close | 31-Dec-97 | | | 165,420 | |
High | 17-Jul-98 | | | 190,194 | |
Low | 8-Oct-98 | | | 152,689 | |
Close | 31-Dec-98 | | | 187,884 | |
Low | 17-Feb-99 | | | 183,318 | |
High | 16-Jul-99 | | | 214,455 | |
Close | 31-Dec-99 | | | 210,168 | |
Low | 25-Feb-00 | | | 191,317 | |
High | 1-Sep-00 | | | 221,351 | |
Close | 29-Dec-00 | | | 210,997 | |
High | 21-May-01 | | | 216,930 | |
Low | 21-Sep-01 | | | 166,373 | |
Close | 31-Dec-01 | | | 195,336 | |
High | 19-Mar-02 | | | 201,690 | |
Low | 9-Oct-02 | | | 140,313 | |
Close | 31-Dec-02 | | | 160,381 | |
Low | 11-Mar-03 | | | 145,989 | |
High | 31-Dec-03 | | | 204,175 | |
Close | 31-Dec-03 | | | 204,175 | |
Low | 12-Aug-04 | | | 199,152 | |
High | 30-Dec-04 | | | 228,446 | |
Close | 31-Dec-04 | | | 228,113 | |
Low | 20-Apr-05 | | | 218,372 | |
High | 14-Dec-05 | | | 246,907 | |
Close | 30-Dec-05 | | | 243,681 | |
Low | 13-Jun-06 | | | 242,646 | |
High | 15-Dec-06 | | | 283,196 | |
Close | 29-Dec-06 | | | 281,615 | |
Low | 5-Mar-07 | | | 275,075 | |
High | 13-Jul-07 | | | 312,492 | |
Close | 31-Dec-07 | | | 293,656 | |
Low | 20-Nov-08 | | | 151,582 | |
High | 3-Jan-08 | | | 289,857 | |
Close | 31-Dec-08 | | | 183,429 | |
| | | Consumer Price Index (inflation)7 | |
| | | | | |
| | | $ | 10,000 | |
Low | 31-Jul-78 | | | 10,000 | |
High | 29-Dec-78 | | | 10,304 | |
Close | 29-Dec-78 | | | 10,304 | |
Low | 31-Jan-79 | | | 10,396 | |
High | 31-Dec-79 | | | 11,674 | |
Close | 31-Dec-79 | | | 11,674 | |
Low | 31-Jan-80 | | | 11,842 | |
High | 31-Dec-80 | | | 13,135 | |
Close | 31-Dec-80 | | | 13,135 | |
Low | 31-Jan-81 | | | 13,242 | |
High | 31-Dec-81 | | | 14,307 | |
Close | 31-Dec-81 | | | 14,307 | |
Low | 31-Jan-82 | | | 14,353 | |
High | 31-Oct-82 | | | 14,947 | |
Close | 31-Dec-82 | | | 14,855 | |
Low | 31-Jan-83 | | | 14,886 | |
High | 30-Dec-83 | | | 15,419 | |
Close | 30-Dec-83 | | | 15,419 | |
Low | 31-Jan-84 | | | 15,510 | |
High | 31-Oct-84 | | | 16,027 | |
Close | 31-Dec-84 | | | 16,027 | |
Low | 31-Jan-85 | | | 16,058 | |
High | 31-Dec-85 | | | 16,636 | |
Close | 31-Dec-85 | | | 16,636 | |
Low | 30-Apr-86 | | | 16,530 | |
High | 31-Dec-86 | | | 16,819 | |
Close | 31-Dec-86 | | | 16,819 | |
Low | 31-Jan-87 | | | 16,925 | |
High | 30-Nov-87 | | | 17,565 | |
Close | 31-Dec-87 | | | 17,565 | |
Low | 31-Jan-88 | | | 17,610 | |
High | 30-Dec-88 | | | 18,341 | |
Close | 30-Dec-88 | | | 18,341 | |
Low | 31-Jan-89 | | | 18,432 | |
High | 29-Dec-89 | | | 19,193 | |
Close | 29-Dec-89 | | | 19,193 | |
Low | 31-Jan-90 | | | 19,391 | |
High | 30-Nov-90 | | | 20,365 | |
Close | 31-Dec-90 | | | 20,365 | |
Low | 31-Jan-91 | | | 20,487 | |
High | 31-Dec-91 | | | 20,989 | |
Close | 31-Dec-91 | | | 20,989 | |
Low | 31-Jan-92 | | | 21,020 | |
High | 30-Nov-92 | | | 21,613 | |
Close | 31-Dec-92 | | | 21,598 | |
Low | 31-Jan-93 | | | 21,705 | |
High | 30-Nov-93 | | | 22,192 | |
Close | 31-Dec-93 | | | 22,192 | |
Low | 31-Jan-94 | | | 22,253 | |
High | 30-Nov-94 | | | 22,785 | |
Close | 30-Dec-94 | | | 22,785 | |
Low | 31-Jan-95 | | | 22,877 | |
High | 31-Oct-95 | | | 23,394 | |
Close | 29-Dec-95 | | | 23,364 | |
Low | 31-Jan-96 | | | 23,501 | |
High | 30-Nov-96 | | | 24,140 | |
Close | 31-Dec-96 | | | 24,140 | |
Low | 31-Jan-97 | | | 24,216 | |
High | 31-Oct-97 | | | 24,597 | |
Close | 31-Dec-97 | | | 24,551 | |
Low | 31-Jan-98 | | | 24,597 | |
High | 31-Oct-98 | | | 24,962 | |
Close | 31-Dec-98 | | | 24,947 | |
Low | 31-Jan-99 | | | 25,008 | |
High | 30-Nov-99 | | | 25,616 | |
Close | 31-Dec-99 | | | 25,616 | |
Low | 31-Jan-00 | | | 25,693 | |
High | 30-Nov-00 | | | 26,499 | |
Close | 29-Dec-00 | | | 26,484 | |
Low | 31-Jan-01 | | | 26,651 | |
High | 30-Sep-01 | | | 27,139 | |
Close | 31-Dec-01 | | | 26,895 | |
Low | 31-Jan-02 | | | 26,956 | |
High | 31-Oct-02 | | | 27,595 | |
Close | 31-Dec-02 | | | 27,534 | |
Low | 31-Jan-03 | | | 27,656 | |
High | 30-Sep-03 | | | 28,189 | |
Close | 31-Dec-03 | | | 28,052 | |
Low | 31-Jan-04 | | | 28,189 | |
High | 30-Nov-04 | | | 29,072 | |
Close | 31-Dec-04 | | | 28,965 | |
Low | 31-Jan-05 | | | 29,026 | |
High | 31-Oct-05 | | | 30,320 | |
Close | 30-Dec-05 | | | 29,954 | |
Low | 31-Jan-06 | | | 30,183 | |
High | 31-Aug-06 | | | 31,035 | |
Close | 29-Dec-06 | | | 30,715 | |
Low | 31-Jan-07 | | | 30,809 | |
High | 30-Nov-07 | | | 31,990 | |
Close | 31-Dec-07 | | | 31,969 | |
Low | 31-Dec-08 | | | 31,998 | |
High | 31-Jul-08 | | | 33,480 | |
Close | 31-Dec-08 | | | 31,998 | |
[end mountain chart]
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31 | | | 1978 | 6 | | 1979 | | | 1980 | | | 1981 | | | 1982 | | | 1983 | | | 1984 | | | 1985 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends in cash | | $ | 216 | | | | 405 | | | | 553 | | | | 580 | | | | 634 | | | | 594 | | | | 556 | | | | 582 | |
Value at year-end1 | | $ | 8,947 | | | | 9,892 | | | | 11,390 | | | | 10,688 | | | | 13,522 | | | | 16,424 | | | | 16,759 | | | | 21,148 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends reinvested | | $ | 217 | | | | 421 | | | | 603 | | | | 665 | | | | 768 | | | | 755 | | | | 734 | | | | 795 | |
Value at year-end1 | | $ | 9,155 | | | | 10,556 | | | | 12,807 | | | | 12,654 | | | | 16,957 | | | | 21,389 | | | | 22,621 | | | | 29,448 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return | | | (8.4 | )% | | | 15.3 | | | | 21.3 | | | | (1.2 | ) | | | 34.0 | | | | 26.1 | | | | 5.8 | | | | 30.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31 | | 1986 | | | 1987 | | | 1988 | | | 1989 | | | 1990 | | | 1991 | | | 1992 | | | 1993 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends in cash | | | 636 | | | | 717 | | | | 895 | | | | 1,225 | | | | 1,058 | | | | 904 | | | | 988 | | | | 1,084 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 25,151 | | | | 25,463 | | | | 28,561 | | | | 35,438 | | | | 32,180 | | | | 40,940 | | | | 44,059 | | | | 50,884 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | 894 | | | | 1,034 | | | | 1,328 | | | | 1,877 | | | | 1,679 | | | | 1,478 | | | | 1,655 | | | | 1,858 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 35,941 | | | | 37,295 | | | | 43,246 | | | | 55,597 | | | | 52,130 | | | | 67,947 | | | | 74,871 | | | | 88,466 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return | | | 22.0 | | | | 3.8 | | | | 16.0 | | | | 28.6 | | | | (6.2 | ) | | | 30.3 | | | | 10.2 | | | | 18.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31 | | 1994 | | | 1995 | | | 1996 | | | 1997 | | | 1998 | | | 1999 | | | 2000 | | | 2001 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends in cash | | | 1,238 | | | | 1,160 | | | | 1,196 | | | | 1,351 | | | | 1,428 | | | | 1,578 | | | | 1,716 | | | | 1,844 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 50,319 | | | | 66,210 | | | | 78,143 | | | | 97,513 | | | | 112,292 | | | | 138,151 | | | | 142,315 | | | | 126,959 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | 2,171 | | | | 2,082 | | | | 2,187 | | | | 2,511 | | | | 2,691 | | | | 3,013 | | | | 3,319 | | | | 3,611 | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 89,641 | | | | 120,306 | | | | 144,352 | | | | 182,855 | | | | 213,421 | | | | 265,882 | | | | 277,235 | | | | 250,761 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return | | | 1.3 | | | | 34.2 | | | | 20.0 | | | | 26.7 | | | | 16.7 | | | | 24.6 | | | | 4.3 | | | | (9.6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31 | | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2008 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends in cash | | | 2,289 | | | | 1,850 | | | | 2,590 | | | | 2,729 | | | | 2,590 | | | | 4,572 | | | | 2,938 | | | | | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 102,816 | | | | 133,434 | | | | 149,159 | | | | 163,728 | | | | 192,480 | | | | 213,905 | | | | 126,717 | 5 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends reinvested | | | 4,553 | | | | 3,755 | | | | 5,345 | | | | 5,735 | | | | 5,534 | | | | 9,917 | | | | 6,506 | | | | | |
Value at year-end1 | | | 207,271 | | | | 273,523 | | | | 311,563 | | | | 347,960 | | | | 414,904 | | | | 471,134 | | | | 284,112 | 3 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return | | | (17.3 | ) | | | 32.0 | | | | 13.9 | | | | 11.7 | | | | 19.2 | | | | 13.6 | | | | (39.7 | ) | | | | |
Average annual total return 11.6%1
| 1As outlined in the prospectus, the sales charge is reduced for accounts of $25,000 or more and is eliminated for purchases of $1 million or more. There is no sales charge on dividends or capital gain distributions that are reinvested in additional shares. |
| 2The maximum initial sales charge was 8.50% prior to July 1, 1988. |
| 3Includes reinvested dividends of $79,693 and reinvested capital gain distributions of $170,881. |
| 4Results of the Lipper Growth and Income Funds Index reflect fund expenses but do not reflect any applicable front-end sales charges. If any applicable front-end sales charges were included, results of the index would be lower. |
| 5Includes reinvested capital gain distributions of $91,556 but does not reflect income dividends of $42,697 taken in cash. |
| 6For the period August 1, 1978 (when Capital Research and Management Company became investment adviser), through December 31, 1978. |
| 7Computed from data supplied by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. |
The results shown are before taxes on fund distributions and sale of fund shares.
The Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index is unmanaged, and includes reinvested distributions but does not reflect the effect of sales charges, commissions or expenses.
The path we have traveled and the road ahead
After outpacing its benchmark indexes for six straight years and posting double-digit annual gains for half a decade, Fundamental Investors finished deep in negative territory for 2008. The fund’s downturn mirrored the huge selloff in global equity markets brought on by the seizing up of credit markets, the precariousness or outright failure of a number of preeminent financial institutions and a major economic slowdown. The unrelenting bad news made for exceptionally difficult market conditions, and investors had few places to hide.
Such an environment tests the confidence of investors and the mettle of those who manage their investments. That was certainly the case during the past year when assets many had earmarked for goals like retirement and children’s college expenses lost significant value. Furthermore, the foreseeable future offers little in the way of consolation. The magnitude of global economic problems suggests that the current period of uncertainty and volatility could stretch well into 2009.
In the following pages, Dina Perry, president and portfolio counselor for Fundamental Investors, and her fellow counselors — Jim Drasdo, Ron Morrow, Mike Kerr and Brady Enright — look back on a year of daunting challenges. They explain how experience and fundamental research continue to play a vital role both in maintaining a measured perspective and navigating ongoing market volatility. Lastly, they discuss how the present challenges might lead to future investment opportunities and offer a compelling case for continuing to make Fundamental Investors a component of your diversified portfolio.
Dina: The last year was extremely challenging and quite different from other market and economic environments that most of us have experienced. I am much more used to markets that key off economic and business cycles, but this crisis was unusual as it originated in housing. We knew housing was a bubble and that some mortgages should not have been issued — and we avoided certain holdings in those areas. However, we did not anticipate nor did our experience prepare us for a crisis of this magnitude.
Ron: The velocity of the downturn was very surprising and, ultimately, there was no place to hide. That is rather unusual. For example, during the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s, I was a consumer products analyst, and the companies I covered held up quite well. And during the tech bubble, the trouble was by and large contained within a handful of sectors and Fundamental Investors steered clear of many of those areas. This time, however, there were a great many bullets to dodge and we weren’t as fortunate. I know we all feel terrible about that.
Mike: I agree. We wish we would have had more success at protecting our shareholders during the decline. Some of the strategies we had in place to preserve capital didn’t work.
Dina: Holdings in energy and materials that had been key drivers of fund returns over the past few years suffered sharp drops as the broad economic downturn caused commodity prices to decline. We had trimmed these positions somewhat, but still maintained sizable concentrations.
Jim: Things that I thought would have helped, like companies that stood to benefit from healthy demand by consumers in emerging Asian countries who weren’t affected by the U.S. recession or real estate troubles, did not.
Trouble on a global scale
Ron: The global scope of the repercussions has been a real surprise. Many had thought that certain economies had decoupled — that is to say, economies in China, India and the Far East might have been insulated from trouble in the United States. But the old adage that when the U.S. sneezes the world catches cold turned out to be true.
[Begin Pull Quote]
“The last year was extremely challenging and quite different from other market and economic environments that most of us have experienced.”
— Dina Perry, president and portfolio counselor
[End Pull Quote]
[Begin Photo Caption]
31 years of investment experience
17 years with American Funds
[photo of Dina Perry]
[End Photo Caption]
[Begin Sidebar]
[photo of a person in snowshoes walking between snow covered mountains]
Enduring difficult markets can be challenging for even the most seasoned investment professionals. Experience and a rigorous approach to research can help identify investment opportunities that may benefit shareholders as conditions improve.
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Sidebar]
When volatile markets make valuing companies difficult, it’s important to take the long view when analyzing the prospects of potential investments.
[photo of a telescope pointed towards snow covered mountains]
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Photo Caption]
[photo of Jim Drasdo]
37 years of investment experience
32 years with American Funds
[End Photo Caption]
[Begin Pull Quote]
“Despite the extreme difficulty we’ve experienced, certain things are unchanged. People in developing nations like China and India still aspire to live middle class lives, which should help the global economy continue to grow.”
— Jim Drasdo, portfolio counselor
[End Pull Quote]
Brady: Naturally, we ask ourselves “What should we have done differently? What did we miss?” As Dina mentioned, we foresaw troubles in the subprime mortgage market but it was difficult to imagine that blue chip companies totally unrelated to the financial or housing industries would, consequently, be unable to finance their operations. Yet that’s what happened.
Dina: What we did not fully comprehend was the effect that these sliced and diced mortgage securities — which were distributed globally — would have on credit markets.
Jim: This situation really reinforced to me the extent to which the world works on credit. Autos are a good example: Most people who buy a car take out a loan. Beyond that, the dealer with merchandise in the showroom and the parts supplier sending products to Detroit need financing too. It all works on credit, but when lending grinds to a halt as it did in this case, it creates substantial systemic problems.
Dina: The good news is that there has been a massive global response by governments and central banks. In the U.S., the Federal Reserve’s actions were truly unprecedented. Not only did the Fed lower interest rates, it bought up bad instruments, put liquidity into the banks and took control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as institutions like AIG.
Another Great Depression? Key differences
Ron: The coordinated global response among governments and central banks represents a key difference between what’s happening now and what happened in the Great Depression. We’re not seeing the trade restrictions and other misguided measures that ultimately fostered ultra-high unemployment back then. Consequently, we still have an economy that can recover.
Jim: And the fact remains that despite the extreme difficulty we’ve experienced, certain things are unchanged. People in developing nations like China and India still aspire to live middle class lives, which should help the global economy continue to grow. I also believe that innovation in America is alive and well.
Mike: That said, we do have concerns. The scale of the response has been huge and it’s not exactly clear what the combined impact of all these policies will be. That’s why, as we think about positioning Fundamental Investors’ portfolio, it’s important to own companies that we believe are financially solid and have the ability to endure a very difficult economic stretch. Likewise it’s crucial to create a portfolio of companies that can participate in an economic recovery if one takes hold.
[Begin Sidebar]
No place to hide | | | |
| | | |
All market downturns are different. Some declines are brought on by negative results in a handful of sectors while others are attributable to broad based market weakness. The 2008 decline was widespread, as evident in the steep downturn in each of the 10 sectors that make up the unmanaged Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index, a broad measure of U.S. stocks. As you can see in the table below, even consumer staples, traditionally something of a safe haven during uncertain, recessionary times, posted a return of –15.4%. | |
| | | |
Benchmark: S&P 500 | | | |
| | | |
Economic sector* | | 2008 | |
| | | |
Energy | | | –34.9 | % |
Materials | | | –45.7 | |
Industrials | | | –39.9 | |
Consumer discretionary | | | –33.5 | |
Consumer staples | | | –15.4 | |
Health care | | | –22.8 | |
Financials | | | –55.3 | |
Information technology | | | –43.1 | |
Telecommunications services | | | –30.5 | |
Utilities | | | –29.0 | |
Total | | | –37.0 | |
| | | | |
*Source: Morningstar (with dividends reinvested). | | | | |
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Pull Quote]
“Our analysts are traveling more than ever and their reports, combined with the nature of the broader market environment, reveal some compelling possibilities.”
— Ron Morrow, portfolio counselor
[End Pull Quote]
[Begin Photo Caption]
41 years of investment experience
12 years with American Funds
[photo of Ron Morrow]
[End Photo Caption]
[Begin Sidebar]
[photo of snow covered railroad tracks - train cars in the background]
Whether conditions are calm or turbulent, no two investment professionals share the same outlook on markets and the economy. A system that enables each to invest according to his or her highest conviction ideas is central to the fund’s approach.
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Pull Quote]
“At a time when others may be cutting back on travel and other research expenses, our goal is to keep our investment resources intact and engaged as we seek opportunities for our shareholders.”
— Mike Kerr, portfolio counselor
[End Pull Quote]
[Begin Photo Caption]
[photo of Mike Kerr]
26 years of investment experience
24 years with American Funds
[End Photo Caption]
[Begin Sidebar]
[photo of a man looking in a ice chest]
For investment professionals, field research can be especially important during trying economic times, when the scene on the ground can be difficult to grasp from afar.
[End Sidebar]
What’s the right price?
Jim: Valuing things when investors are fearful is tough. When I joined Capital, the Japanese market was the highest flying in the world. It was selling at 80 to 90 times earnings, and people were rationalizing those figures. Yet recently I heard an analyst talking about a very good Japanese company with a track record of 15% annual growth and two-thirds of its market value in cash that is now selling at eight to nine times earnings. Yet the analyst was saying “I think I’m going to wait until it’s cheaper.” In extreme market conditions, it becomes difficult to ascertain fair prices for stocks.
Mike: I agree and think that right now most of us are focusing on some very basic things. A starting point is companies with strong balance sheets — ones that have considerable cash and don’t look as if they will have to borrow money over the next few years, because the cost of borrowing right now is just extraordinary.
Brady: As we seek to understand the obstacles businesses are facing, we’re doing a great deal of fundamental research. And we’re being especially careful not to engage only with senior managers, as there can often be considerable distance between them and their company’s day-to-day operations. Instead we may seek out a sales manager or someone closer to the frontlines as they often provide meaningful insights.
Mike: We have always been deeply committed to a research-intense approach and we remain so today. At a time when others may be cutting back on travel and other research expenses, our goal is to keep our investment resources intact and engaged as we seek opportunities for our shareholders.
Ron: Our analysts are traveling more than ever and their reports, combined with the nature of the broader market environment, reveal some compelling possibilities.
Unprecedented valuations
Brady: Most of the time we are faced with the dilemma of investing in a top-tier company at a premium price or buying a second- or third-tier company at a discount. But right now I feel that many great companies are available at what I think will prove to be attractive valuations. There are companies that fit this description in every industry.
Mike: One company I looked at, for example, has a strong order backlog, and a significant part of its business comes from defense spending, which is somewhat recession-proof. Yet it faces near-term headwinds because credit market troubles make it difficult for customers to finance purchases. But the fact is, in three years’ time I believe demand for its products will be strong. So if you look longer term, its earnings power is probably fairly good and its valuation has never been this depressed.
Dina: A long-term investment approach is essential because the near-term outlook is murky. But as the global economy eventually gets back on surer footing, many of our holdings may stand to benefit. Another thing we’re paying attention to is the potential impact that increased domestic infrastructure spending could have if it becomes part of the upcoming stimulus package. We believe that companies in the energy, materials and machinery sectors may benefit and, as a result, represent investment opportunities.
The flexibility to act
Ron: One advantage we enjoy is the breadth of Fundamental Investors’ mandate. We are able to invest in domestic and overseas companies. We seek to provide regular quarterly income, but not every company in which we invest must pay a dividend. We’re able to make investments in value and growth companies, as well as those that fall in the middle of the spectrum. In an environment like the present — where investment opportunities are coming in all shapes and sizes — that can be a big advantage.
Dina: Opportunities do indeed come in all shapes and sizes, which generally means that none of the fund’s portfolio counselors have exactly the same idea about which are best. Thankfully this diversity of opinions is well served by our multiple portfolio counselor system — the investment approach we use to manage the fund. It gives each of us responsibility for a portion of the fund’s assets that we then invest according to our highest conviction ideas. Our experience and viewpoints guide us in different directions. For example, some of my fellow counselors are currently choosing to hold significant amounts of cash, while I have chosen to invest virtually the full amount of assets allocated to me.
Brady: One final point I believe is extremely significant to make: Fundamental Investors is an important investment for me personally, not simply some abstract project that I work on. It’s real money to me, just as I know it represents the savings and hopes of our shareholders. We feel everything that has happened over the last year on a personal level, and we understand how trying this period has been for our shareholders. We remain laser-focused on making the fund’s results as good as they can be given the fund’s objectives.
[Begin Sidebar]
Being able to invest in a wide variety of companies — including those headquartered abroad — allows investment professionals, operating within fund guidelines, to chart their own course as they pursue Fundamental Investors’ growth-and-income mandate.
[photo of a man sitting on a mountain top looking at a map]
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Photo Caption]
17 years of investment experience
12 years with American Funds
[photo of Brady Enright]
[End Photo Caption]
[Begin Pull Quote]
“Fundamental Investors is an important investment for me personally, not simply some abstract project that I work on. It’s real money to me, just as I know it represents the savings and hopes of our shareholders.”
— Brady Enright, portfolio counselor
[End Pull Quote]
The following summary investment portfolio is designed to streamline the report and help investors better focus on a fund’s principal holdings. For details on how to obtain a complete schedule of portfolio holdings, please see the inside back cover.